Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-07-21 Council PacketKenai City Council Meeting Packet July 21, 1971 Kenai, Alaska Welcome to the CiW Council Me.eti.ng The members of the Kenai City Council welcome you to tonight's meeting. Kenai has what is known as the Council-Man,er form of government. The members of the Council are elected by the residents of the City at large, and meet at least twice a month to conduct City business. The City Manager i~ employed by the Council to conduct the business of the City and to administer the Council'~s policies. We wish to encourage participation in the proceedings of the Council and hope that you will feel free to express your thoughts and opinions. If you wish to bring up a matter which does not appear on the agenda at a regular meeting, you may be heard under CITIZEN'S GRIEVANCES AND REQUESTS, at the end of the Council agenda. However, it is preferred that you write the City Manager in advance so that yr~ag subject can be placed on the agenda. (The normal meeting pattern is the 1st and 3rd Wednesday. however, when the amount of business justifies, the Council will me~t at special called meetings. To a~ertain the coming schedule, call the City Manager's office.) Your letter should be in the City Manager's office not later than Wednesday preceding the meeting you wish to attend, and should indue m some detail the nature of the subject on winch you wish to speak. By doing so the Mayor ~nd all msmbers of the Council will be awar~ of your intention to speak before the meeting and will b~ b~tter pr~ to answer questions, on the subject you wish to discuss. We appreciate your interest in coming to this meeting, and hope you will be a regular visitor to ~e meetings of your City Council. Mayor Steinbeck City Manager City Council John Steinbeck, Mayor Hugh Malone Jim Hornaday Bob Norene Tru McGrady Beb Bielefeld Nancy Powers (Jr. Jim D~yle Judi Browning (Jr. c~. ) E. H. Glotfelty Raymond D. Bart city Manager Finance Director James E. Fisher Sharon Sterling City At~rney Acting City Clerk A~ B· C· D~ E· F· G· H· AGENDA .REGULAR MEETING, KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 21, 1971, 8'00 P.M. ROLL CALL PERSONS PRESENT 'SCI. iEDULED TO BE HEARD'. 1. Mr. Halcro - Alaska Parking 2. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting of Jul-y 7, 1971 CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2. REPORTS 1. City Manager a. Capital Improvements - Mayor's Comm'ittee b. Soldotna Sewage Outfall - Meeting Friday July 23, with representatives of the City of Kenai, City of Soldotna, Corps of Engineers, State Department of Hea'lth and Welfare, Department of Enviromental Protection. c. Million Dollar Bond Sale, July 27, 1971 d. Sewer Treatment - Bid Award- July 27, 1.971 2.' City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5.. Finance Director 6. Plan~ing & Zoning 7. Borough Assemblymen 1971 BUSINESS Recommendations Rec ommenda t i on OLD 1. 2. 3. HEA's acceptan"e of Ordinance No. 199- 71 4. Ordinance 200-71 - Street Naming & Numbering NEW BUSINESS 1. 2. · · ~ for hiring a ne~' account an.t and his salary for termination of Alaska Parking Lease Agreeme. nt wit:'~ I.B.M. - Finance Department 'Resolution No. 71-31 - Sale of property, Lot. 8, Part 2, Alyeska S/D - Site for Kenai Professional Building Ord.:inance 202-71 - PrOhibiting consumption of intoxicating beverages on the premises of any school within the City of Kenai Acceptance and final payment of improvements of road between N.B.A, 'a.nd Royal Redoubt Purchase of trucks - Memorandum - City Manager PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: CITIZEN'S GRIEVANCt:S AND REQUESTS 1. 2. 3. THINGS TO DO LIST E-1 E-2 F-2 F-3 G-5 G-6 Sites for Fire Training Programs - Rec ommenda t ions Under consideration Letter to Corps of Engineers requesting public heari-g on Soldotna Outfall Sewer, request.ing presentations from various. Agencies (U. S. Fish & Wildlife, Corps of Engineers, State Fish & Game, Alaska E.nvironmental Quality, Health & Welfare and other interested agencies) Done Draw up suit t° determine powers zoning and reapportionment. and In process I.nform public old name s. they can petition to reserve Done Negotiate with Siddle on accountant salary. Done Negotiate ~ith Alaska P'~rking Company' Done hi~( :'i:~:~17~:'" :': :'~:';i: ""'. .............. 't" i'~ ': ......... '. ": "" 7. .................................... :..~i... "...' .u.'-- .",, ,. ,,,o-t. k,.a~..,...,,"' ,.,,..,.~ ,., ' -., · ' .......... ' :.~.......: .............. , .... . ........ .., c._ k,,...., ~.,,,'" '~"L;r_-..t,.,'.'"."'~_"". ..... ' ...5' .; · ~ t. - .i. 1- L, TH ~~ K July 21, 1971 Edwin H. Glotfelty, City Manager FROM: Raymond D. Butt, Finance Director 0 SUB~TECT: Hiring-. New Accountant .We have discussed several.times 'the..,need. f°r- · .someOne of sufficient accounting horse~er'~t°'.~e'~ · over the day to day.., accounting chores in the~.Cit¥.-~ we have~ established these criteria~ 1. Independent judgement from and training 2-. Ability to work wig. out super~rtsi salary of $1500 to $1800. 3. Ability to-resolve complex problems We have also established that the ~ed~.' ,is and of short duration, The question. of how ~tter of which way do we want to go. I wOUld a ~erson not to exceed three months with a ~x.im~ .. This reco~endation 'ties into a philosPhy .updating our equipment so that ~ere is no~.~ne.ed continual e~ansion of the City..work force records history Raymond D. Butt Finance Director ko/ July 21, 19 71 TO: Edwin H. Glotfelty, City Manager FROM: Raymond D. Burt, Finance Director SUBJECT: Accounting MaChine Lease (IBM) With your ¢oncurrance I have investigated several methods, of eliminating the bottleneck and problems in the financial reporting and administrative control- systems of the City. To state the problems in broad terms: 1. We operate a 3 million dollar business which requires administrative and monitoring data on a daily basis. 2. The projection is for a 50% minimum increase in work load during the next one-to two years- 3. We have a piece of equipment on lease which is operative Only 60% of the time. When working it has only the ability to post., numbers to a ledger. It has no ability to produce statements. We usually wind 'up doing our records by hand or being delayed--from five to eight days. The investigation showed that there are a number of good. systems on the market; some .good, .some no.t. so good, but all expensive. The basic criteria we are. looking for is the ability to update our rec~ords to have access, at random, 'to any balance or data..at any time, to be able to print a statement of ac¢oun-t'-in detail or summary from the data on file, on command, and the ability, once set up, to be operated by any clerical pers'on who has no specialized training, or back- ground. Ail except BUrroughs and IBM have been eliminated for lack of support in maintenance and system operation. Burroughs Corporation has a machine which Would do the job; however, the equipment costs in the vicinity of $45,'000 and must be leased through a commercial invest- ment-leasing firm. I have not been impressed by~, the support nor the reliability of the equipment. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS I am recommending the IBM Corporation's small business- oriented computer, the System 3-6. It has the following physical characteristics. 1. Print speed The recommended print speed is 85 Characters per second, 150/+ characters wide. 2. Computer speed (access time) It is expressed .in micro seconds, and wOuld mean very little except that the computer ability is always waiting for the- printer to catch up. 3. Direct entry The machine comes with a typewriter and adding machine type Keyboard. The entries onto the system are made t.hrough the Keyboard. Although the machine can be equiped with a card imput device we have no .need for i~t. 4, Di rec t i.nqui~ry _. Any operation may be halted and inquiries may be made into the stored data without losing or damaging the on-going operation. 5. Dimc storage Ail information is stored on interchangeable discs with 2% 'million. to 9.8 million characters-on line at any given time. 6. Stored Pr0gr~ · Ail programs are stored in disc so that there is no problem in what program to use when. 7. Field support In my experience with IBM they have always responded within four hours and usually within the hour in machine problems. If the time delay is more than eight hours they make arrange- ments for your work to be done elsewhere. 8. Technical support IBM will not let a system fail because of technical problems. ADVANTAGES 1. After the machine is programmed the operator can be trained in four hours or less. 2. The work load Of the City may expand up to four times with- out increasing the basic machine gear ..or people. It may be desirable a't a later time to add another disc drive. 3. Accounts receivable statements or billing, General ledger statements, Accounts payable statements may be pulled at' any .given point in time, or daily in less than one hour and~ in finished form. 4. The lease is cancellable on 30 days notice. 5. Once operational, the need for the highly .trained, highly skilled specialist is over. From that point in time the skilled clerical force can produce the same results. Only in the case of new applications is there a need for the high priced executive time. DISADVANTAGES 1. Time delay in machine acquisition (6 months). 2. Demands on time and talent during the inception Period. 3. Regimentation of procedure and methods. COST CO~PARI SON ,Mqn,th!,y Cos ts Rental - Hardware So ftware One Time Cos ts Disc 4 @ $175 Freight Program help minimum (maximum $8000) Present Costs Burroughs -lease Repair Contract $1130 60 ~11'9 5 $ 700 300 1000 $200'0' 171.95 136.66 '3'08.61 comp.aris0n Proposed monthly Present monthly $1195 309 Additional $ 884 In the long run ( 12 months ) the equipment would pay for i~,lf. For instance, to close the books and publish a statement is 60 to' 70 hours work for two people of which one must be a qualified accountant. The System 3 is aUtomatically closed and updated at the end of each procedure. Reconciliation of Accounts Receivable and Payable is automatic. Minimum cost now would be somewhere in the vicinity of $600 per month. ko/ CITY 'OF KENAI - RESOLUTION NO. 71-31_ A RESOLUTION AU~THORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO SELL TO KENAI STEEL BUILDINGS, INCORPORATED, KENAI, ALASKA, LOT 8 OF THE ALYESKA SUBD.M SION, PART TWO, ACCORDING TO PLAT NO. K-1421. WHYS, the City of Kena~^ ~s_P~resently leasing Lot 8 of · ~ Alyeska Subdivision to the .gzl~~~s~eel Buildings, Im=o~porated, -~er a Agreement signed by the City of Kenai, August 9, 1965 an4 ~... terms of the Agreement as signed by both parties, indic&re that ~%he Alaska Steel Buildings, Incorporated, has the option to purchase ~~ 8, Alyeska Subdivision, within a period of ten (10) years; and WHEREAS, the Alaska Steel Buildings, Incorporated, has expressed a desire to purchase Lot 8 of the Alyesk& Subdivision; and WHERF~$, the ability of the Alaska Steel Buildings, ~~rporated, to re-finance the present b~ilding of above ~e~tioned ~f~ depends on. the purchase of the lot in question'. -.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF T~ CITY OF ~I, ALASKA, AS FOLLOWS: ., 1. That the Administration be authorize~ a~ to sell to Alaska Steel Buildings, I~orp~rm~d, .'Lot 8, Alyeska Subdivision, as described above for 2. That the monies be deposited in the Airport Build,t~ Land Fund for the City of Ke.~mi, Alaska. day o f ~mly, 1971. PASS.~' ~ APPROVED TH I S A~T ~. sh&r~'h: st~rli'n~, .... Act'ing 'City clef[ l°tS ~n the Business (B) Zone, the Condition of these leases which restricts use to uses of the ~ Business (B) Zone shall be automatically voided and, thereafter, the lot shall b~ subject to normal zoning p~,oc edures. " 9, 1he successful Lessee agrees to commence development .of any lot ~ithin two (2) years of the lease .ale. Conazenc~nt ~ development 'shall donsist of impro.ve- a~nts (site p~eparation and buildin~ construction) of a substantial nature. In the event improvements, as above Aesc~ibed, are not begun in the time specified, the lease may be terminated by the City. '10, Leases. will be offered up to ~a term of fifty-five (55) · ~ears, bidders will be regu~ed to submit an outline plan o'f uae and development at the time of .sale; a detail plan of development must be.sub~,~tted for approval p.~ior to commencement of work. 11. Bidders are advised to familiarize themselves with these ceaditiona, the subd~vision map, the city ZmminA 0~dinance and site conditions. an option to purchase, t.hat ~ot. The option w~ll run for 'a period of ten (10). years from July 1, 19&5 and ending ~une 30, 197~. : 13. · In the event that the option's is exercised within the ten 2ea~ period the lessee and the city will mmtuall2 select a qualified appraiser to dete~nine the true value of the lot; his determination shall be the purchase p~ice of the lot. · In accordance t~ith accepted lease-p.u~, c.hase practices o~edtt will be. ~iven for portions ~ the lease feel paid to date of-purchase; under no ci~cums, tancea will .full credit be ~iven for .lease payments after the first Fear. The City may offer the leases for LOts 9 and 10 with an option to purchase. Special attention is' drawn to the leasing p~actices of the City of Kenai. The leases to be offered, commence With the date 'July 1, 1965 with' the effective date being the date of offer; in the case of .thi.a lease sale tke. effective date will be Au~AIt 2J$, 1~65; in the case of any "over-the-counter" lease, the ~'~ective. date shall be the date on which a lease is offered. Rental payments due for the first year shall be co~;~puted from the effective date in proportion 'of the days remaining until June 30, 1966 divided by 365. The anniversary · date shall therefore be each July 1 with rentals due on or before that anniversary date. . , ~Uld-.."li~e.:to exerC,lLSe the'; Opt~o~..')(~or:-. i::,.'..'-. .of.: ~o.t 8-.o.~ ~e ~:A1yes~ Su~~v!!~on ~..~e', ,lea~. ~n~act. with ~e, ctt . '.' ' ~ .-. ~: "101":'12:.,'. :~::~: ::~e~t~~./i2'"'.O~ : ~e :'tit .-, -~.~. 30, 1975' ha ~~.- as'sess~'' :':.Es~te'. Apprai ,erS., 700' Eigh~ . : . . · '.. :This .c-~t~'. /.... P~ide- ~$38,250 to:;' ~.:the Airport..: Fund ~e l~rai.~rs., · O-. realize ~e lei'ling, price" s0 -,~ .... ..... :....,:: ================================== : OP '966.. Gebhart and Peterson REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS 700 "H" ST.=~T. SU,TZ · ANCHORAGE. A~.ASKA **SOl July 19, 1971 M. G. ~[iHART CHAS. M. PIETIrR$ON Kenai Steel Buildings P.O. Box 340 Kenai, Alaska Attention: Mr. Lucian A. Caro You requee.ted that we give you our opinion as to the land value only of · Lot 8, of the Alye~ Subdivision, Part ~2 according to F/at ~ K-1421. .. In our optnimu, the is value would be TEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS · . report. Details supporting this 'conclusion will be found in the accompanying Very truly yours,. c p/mw July 14~ 1971 TO: Mayor and Council SUBjeCT: Proposed ordinance to prevent consumption or possesolon of alcOholic'beveraaes· on school premises. The Chief of Police, pro.ed by the principal of the '~onai Central High School, has asked if an ordinance couldn*t be passed prohibiting possession of alc°holtc beverages or their consumption on schoo! property. I have reviewed. the various authorities, including Title 11 of Alaska Statutes (related to criminal offenses); Title 4, (related. to regulation of alcohol dispensing activities); and the City Code, Chapters 13 and 19; and have been unable to find a comparable regulatory stltute. One State Stutute, A. S. 11.60.170, relates to gambling or unlicensed liquor traffic being declared, nUisances, and A. S. 11.45.032 relates .to public drunkeness -= which could be difficult to apply ~to consumption or POssession of alcohol on school premises. Ac the tine of forwarding this to you, comments from the followia~ agencies: I hope to have a. Departuent of Law-- (none received 7/14/71) b. AlcohOlic Beverage Control Board -- (torments rec®tved, but not applicable to this situation). .. This ordinance would prevent any' type 'of liquor dispensins activities &n s'chool premises in connection with the. com- munity function of any sort, even though permission of s=hool authorities had been secured. While it is very in'~r.equent that such actions do oCcur, 'it is possible to ine such a situation. JAMES E. PIS~fER ~~tY Attorney CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 202-71 PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OR POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON PREMISES OF ANY' SCHOOL LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY. W~~%S, A. S. 04.15.070 permits municipal regulation of in~t©ating liquors 'within the municipality necessary to the orderly conduct of the business of selling intoxicating liquor' WHEREAS, .complaints have been received regarding the possession and consu~ption of alcoholic beverages on the premises of school or schools .within. the limits of the' City of Kenai, · BE IT ORDAINED 'BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALAS~: Section 1. It is hereby found and' declared that restrictions O~her than those specified in State statutes are. required for the orderly ad~inistration of the sale and regulation of alcotmolic beverages within the City of Kenai, and therefore, a prohibition on the ooaS~ption or possession of alcoholic beverages on the premises of any s~hool or schools within the .city limits is in the public interest and welfare. Section 2'. That the Code of the City of Kenai, 1963, as amended _ _ _ is he~eb~ further a~ended to a~ to Chapter L] the following provisions: Possession of alcoholic ~b~v. erage.s prohibited on. S~hOol' gr~uhd'k. ' S~tion 13-33. No person shall carry or have" ih possession, or under said person's control, or accessible to said person alcoholic liquor or alcoholic beverages on the premises of any school located within the city limits. C~nsumpt.ion of alcohol p_rohibited on school premises. Section 13-34. No person shall consume, ~rink, or' '6%her~ise ingest any alcoholic beverage or alcoholic liquors while in, upon, or passing through any school premises located within the city limits. First reading day of .... , 1971. Second reading day of .... , 1971. PASSED day of _ , 1971. i 1, , [ ~_ 11 i i, ATTEST: JOHN ~ STEkNBECK, Mayor ~har0n sterling, Actihg City' Clerk July 20, 1971 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Edwin H. Glotfelty, City Manager SUBJECT: Project 32C7101 - Acceptance & Payment for Mall ~- Willow Interceptor Street We have made the final inspection on the above named'project and find the contractor has complied With the specifications and performed on his contract. · I. herewith, recommend acceptance of the Project 32C7101 and recommend that paYment be approved with 50% of the 'cost to be billed to the Etolin trust. Edwin H. G City Manager ko/ "July 14, 19~l H. Memo ~ . To: Edwin H. Glotfelty, City Manager From: George L. Jaynes, Special Projects Coordinator Re: Willow Street - Shopping Center Connector Street Final inspection of the Willow Street- .Shopping-Center Connector Street was made on July 14, at 11:30 A. M. In attendance, Mr. Edwin Glotfelty, City Manager, City of Kenai; Mr. George Robinson of Robinson Construction Company, Kenai; Mr.. John C°veyou, Street Superintendent, City of Kenai. After inspecting the road it was decided by all in attendance that the Contractor, Robinson Construction COmpany, had 'filled the obligations re- quired in the· contract .and that the road was constructed as planned and according to the Contract specifications. As ~you recalI the contract agreement was entered into on the 21st day of June ·with completion required within 40 (forty) calendar days. Contract price was $3,453.57. Mr. Robinson 'completed all· documentation and required papor work ac¢ord±n~ to tho ~onoral conditions of tho contract. · . .. Mr. Hugh".Malone,'?Registered. Land Surveyor, City of Kenai, · "~-'di'd the Original ~eng~er line location, cross seCtioning, calculat±ons of quan't±t±es and prepared a map. of this , , project. In addition to-this work he set grade stakes, .. . -2- and computed the final yardage amounts at the con- clusion of the job. A copy of Mr. Malone's estimates have been attached-to this memo. You will note by the last sentence, that no allowance was made for shrinkage or swell. It is reasonable to assume that shrinkage and swell in the amount o.f 10 .or more percent of the final calculations did actually happen. This is nor- mal on all dirt jobs. Assuming the 10% factor as be- ing reasonably accurate then the estimated quant.ity of materials were in fact placed in the road and pay- ment should be made for full quantities. The contract item of 60 feet of 18 inch CMP culvert has been deleted from the contract as it was decided the culvert would serve no useful purpose. It is my recommendation that Robinson Construction be paid the amount of $3,153.57 in full payment for completing the contract as required, payment to be made as soon as poss~...~.~ According'i~.,, I have submitted with this memo ins~n's bill for that amount. Georg~~ .. ~~/ne s ---=- Special Projects Coordinator Enclosure GLJ/pc July 21, 1971 MEMO TO~ Mr. Edwin H. Glotfelty, City Manager FROM: Bruce Massey, Water & Sewer Superintendent RE: Water & Sewer Crossings-Kenai Spur Highway Attached with this memo are the specifications, schedule of quantities, drawings and plans for the ~Kenai Spur Highway Water .and Sewer Crossings. AS you will note, the lines include those crossings which were submitted with the grant application to HUD and EPA. earlier this year. We have received no firm commitments from either organization to defray the cost at. this time; however, the lines must be installed prior to construCtion of the K~nai Urban Section .or the Soldotna-Kenai (F-0-21) project. The alternative to crossing the highway after construction, would involve boring under the Kenai Spur at a cost in excess of $56.00 per linear· foot. Construction now will cost less without boring than could be achieved later even with a 50% grant award. A pre-bid conference will be held on this.project on.July 29th in the Public Works Office of the Airport Terminal~' Building. Bid opening will be AuguSt 3rd with Council award expected on August 4, 1971. "Notice ~to Proceed" will follow immediately. Materials Contracted Labor & Equipment Repair to Aspalt (Linwood only) Total Estimated Costs $13,660.00 23,400.00 ~!, 100.00 Note: Due to "longshoremans [~ortion of this project .will of a materials shortage. Resj~ec tfully, ~ce 'A'~ MasSey Water & Sewer Superintendent Enclosures strike" the Tinker Lane not be. installed because BAM; pc ! I C) CITY OF KENAI - RESOLUTION NO. 71-31 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO SELL TO KENAI STEEL BUILDINGS, INCORPORATED, KENAI, ALASKA, LOT 8 OF THE ALYESKA SUBDIVISION, PART TWO, ACCORDING TO PLAT NO. K-1421. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is presently leasing Lot 8 of the- Alyeska Subdivision to the Kenai Steel Buildings, Incorporated, under an 'Agreement signed by the City of Kenai, August 9, 1965 and the terms of the Agreement as signed by both parties, indicate that the Kenai Steel Buildings, Incorporated, has the option to purchase Lot· 8, Alyeska Subdivision, within a period of ten (10) years; and WHEREAS, the Kenai Steel Buildings, Incorporated, has expressed a de.sire to purchase Lot 8 of the Alyeska Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the ability of the Kenai Steel Buildings, Incorporated, to re-finance the present building of above mentioned land depends on the purchase of the lot in questiOn. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CouNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Administration be authorized and instructed to sell to Kenai Steel Buildings, Incorporated, Lot 8, Alyeska Subdivision, as described above for $13,966. 2. That the monies be deposited in the Airport Building Land Fund for the City of Kenai., Alaska. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF JULY, 1971. ~OHN F. STEINBECK, ~Mayor ATTEST: The undersigned c~.oes hereby c~rt~f~.; .+.hr~? ~.he is a true and c"',:.-~.-: ,~- ' -. :~c~.:~} i'~c~.~:~ of the City Cicy C~ark , 9. lots in the Business (B) Zone, the Condition of these leases which restricts use to uses of the ~ Business (B) Zone shall be automatically voided and, thereafter, the lot shall be subject to normal zoning p~oc edures · ~he successful Lessee .agrees to commence development of any let within two (2) years of the 'lease sale. Commencement e~ development 'shall ~onsiat of impro.ve~ ~ent8 (o~'to p~Opa~ation and 'build~r~ construction) of a- substantial nature. Xn the event improvement, s, aa above Aeac=ibed, a~e nog 1:~~ in ~he time spe¢ified~ the lease may be terminated. ~Y the City. 10, L~aaes will be offered up to ~a telnn of fifty-five (55) ~ears; bidders will be red, tiC'ed to' submit an outline plan of uae' ~d development at .the ti~ of sale; a detail plan of development ~at be subr,~tted for "' .app~~al prior to co~encement of work. 11. Bidders are advised to familiariz· they':selves with thole conditions, the 8ubd~Vision map, the city ZemZr~ O~dinance and ~ite conditions.  ~. he City will offer a lease, on Lot 8 together with .~~ an option to purchas that ~ot. The option will r~n fo~ a' period of ten ~10) ~ears from Jul~ 1, 196~ and en~tn~ ~ 30, 1975. -. - -13. Xn the event that the option is exercised within the ten lear period the lessee and the city will mmtuall2 select a qualified appraise~ to determine the t~e val~ e~ t~ lot; his de~e~ination shall be t~e ~rchaae p~oe of the lot. In accordance ~ith-accepted lease-p~chsse practices o~edtt will ~ ~ven for portio~ ~ the lease fe.e~ .paid to date of ~rchase; ~der no off--stances ~11 ~11 o~edit be ~ven' for lease paints af~~ t~ first ~e Oity may offer the leases for Lots 9 an~ 10 with ~ oPti~ to purchase. l,~l~. Special attention is drawn to the leasin~ practices of 'the' Cit~ of Eenai. The .le~ases_ tO'` be o_~£e..~.d co._.m?ence with the date July 1, 196~ with the erreo.~xve being the date of o'ffe~; in the case of th.ia lease sale tl~ e£fectire date will be l~'~a~ ~$, of ~y' "over-the'co~~er"_ lea~e, the ,e~ctl~e shall be t~ date on vhich a Aeaae ia orz'e~ea. pa~ents ~ue $o~ the first yea~. shall be c'O[~puted the effective date in proporti~ of the days ~ema~lng ~~il ~~e 30, 1966 divided by 36~. ~e a~iversar~ '--date shall therefore be each July 1 with ~entals due on or before ~hag ~niversary ~age. , ~°uld like,?-.' :....~.. exercise. '.'lease contract With the · sUb~-.ect~on -12.. · ~a Per~~:~'~f ten · .~en assessed by --~ppratsers,.. 7.00. :.E . · . :~ '":. :.: .... ;' :' '"~-'is c~PU~~'.':'overa .. othe='' price 'o~. ~t. ::8~ .'Of':r:50 yeari:)..~ld ~, . , .. .... ,..,. , -'.: , .~, - ..: ~ . ... , I'nco~ated, . . . . -. ~4ONE 27 7-422.~4 M. G. Gi='B'HART CHAS. M. PETER$ON Gebhart and Peterson REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS 700 "H" STREET, SUITE: 6 ANCHORAGE:, ALASKA 99501 July 19, 1971 Kenai Steel Buildings P.O. Box 340 Kenai, Alaska Attention- Mr. Luc': tn A. Caro Gentlemen: You reque .... ted t~hat we give you our opinion as to ~he land value only of Lot 8, of the Alyes.~,.a Subdivisions. Part ~2 according, to P'Ja'~ e K-14.21. In our op-n~.on, the is value would be TEN THOUSAND FIVE H[!NDRED DOI~LARS ($zo,soo.oo) report. De~'ails supporting this conclusion wil] be found in the accompanying Very truly yours, Charles M. Peterson CMP/mw JAMES E. FISHER JAMES C. HORNADAY FISHER ~ H NA Y ATTORNIEYS /~LAW ~.~ KIENAI PROFESSIONAL BUILDING - P. O. BOX 397 KENAi~ ALASKA 9961! 25 Ju'i¥ ].97]. TELEPHONE Acting City Clerk Sharon Sterling Box 580 Kenai, ~laska iDear Madam Clerk' This will officially notify the City to the effect that on certain special projects, I am serving as Interim City Attorney during my partner's vacation. Accordingly, I will continue to abstain from voting on matters involving attorneys fees. Please make certain this letter is filed in your :records, for possible future reference. ro U. Ver ly yours ~ JAMES C i'Xr[0RNADAY