The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980-04-10 Council PacketKenai City Council Special Council Meeting April 10, 1980 Ordinance 560-80 - Senior Citizens Project Resolution 80-55 - Senior Citizens Project USKH Bill - Topographic Study Reconsideration - Airport Manager's Office Certification of Election Results Federal Flood Insurance I AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - APRIL 10, 1980 A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA APPROVAL B NEW BUSINESS 11. Ordinance 560-80 - Senior Citizens Project - Amended 2. Resolution 80-55 - Senior Citizens Project - Amended 3. USKH Bill - Topographic Study 4. Reconsideration - Location of Airport Manager's Office (Public Works Committee) 5. Certification of Results of Election of April 9, 1980 6. Letter to Mayor Gilman - Federal Flood Insurance ADJOUANMBNT -? r - r-AwfuL w1mmmmmu www.. 3 GRARARMIRA WON VA SOME --a mmmommommmso MEN J17� �i�17A/7F7■��■■■ WNYWORM.mo7i7m171iCI17vm■■■!o COUNCIL MEETING OF f o - �r CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 560-80 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND ENTITLED "ADDITION TO FORT KENAY" BY 459o, $ sip WHEREAS, the addition to Fort Kenay Capital Project Fund is in need of an additional ¢594 in order to award the construction bid to Timberline Industrie ,gInc., and 90 WHEREAS, there are sufficient monies within the Capital Improvement Special Revenue Fund, which monies have been dedicated by Ordinance No. 341-77 exclusively to capital improvements with a life expectancy of not less than 20 years, to fund this additional appropriation, and WHEREAS, this capital improvement is deemed to be desirable and to meet the criteria as set out by Ordinance No. 341-77, and WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all ap- propriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that estimated revenues and appropriations be increased as follows: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation from Fund Balance $890 Increase Appropriations: Transfer to Capital Projects $890 ADDITION TO FORT KENAY CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfer from Capital Improvement i Fund $890 Increase Appropriations: Construction $890 Ord. 560-80, Page 2 _PASSED BY T= CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 10th day of April, 1980. VINCENT O`REILLY, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: Cg "4j First Reading: April 10, 1980 Second Reading: Apr13 10, 1980 Effective Date: April 10, 1980 is . w r- CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 80-55 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE ADDITION TO FORT KENAY CAPITAL PROJECT FUND: From: Basic Engineering To: Construction $1,100 This transfer is needed to provide monies in the proper line item of expense to award the construction bid to Timberline Industries, Inc. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 10th day of April, 1980. VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk ` Approved by Finance:_ Tom- / J j UNWIN • SCHEBEN • KORYNTA HUETTL - 2515 A STREET ANCHORAGE, AK. 88503 278-4245 1, f 11•1 1(..1 j' f H 1 �)1 :tom{i 4 { . '{ Aeri..J : ha`o 1,27.i s. 1, ' Z ;t�a TERMS: Ifia% per month service charge on all past due accounts. To avoid additional service charge, pay balance due within 15 daye of the data of the billing. ! •please return yellow copy with payment. qa K!!ALICINOF.KSZ 7"FI*jZ't _ 1 V Gn' CLERK } 1 I l • Y . rI I � � 1 )p ' i• '- ,l CITY OF KENAI SPECIAL ELECTION OF APRIL 9, 1980 WE, THE MEMBERS OF THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE RESULTS OF A CANVASS OF THE BALLOTS FOR THE SPECIAL ELECTION OF APRIL 9, 1980. PROPOSITION YES NO SPOILED BALLOTS: ABSENTEE BALLOTS: G% CHALLENGED BALLOTS: ! O TOTAL BALLOTS CAST: ;?Vs LC.[ VIIJCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR COUNCILMAN ED AMBARIAN 2 'COUNCILMAN RAY MEASLES COUNCIL{K MAN RFTTY airwir v tT.0 COUNCILMAN DICK MUELLER ATTEST: t/o, 2/rzT April 10, 1980 Janet Whelan, City Clerk CITY OF KENAI "O�l G't� 01 4" F. O. BOX 500 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 483 • 753S April 4, 1980 Honorable Don Gilman Mayor, Kenai Peninsula Borough P.O. Box 850 Soldohm, AK 99669 Dear Don: Re: Federal Flood Insurance As I understand, the Borough Assembly opted out of participation in the Federal Flood Insurance program taking the cities with that action. I am inquiring on behalf of the City Council as to what options are open to the City and those of its residents who do wish to participate in the i program. 1 Please understand, in addition to Kenai River potential flood hazard, we i experienced some flooding, incidents from Beaver Creek which cost some of our citizens damage. If you, the Assembly or the Planning Department would offer some guidance or point out how we should proceed independently, -we would appreciate. ,v Sincerely, Vin$nt O'Reilly Mayor VOR: jw CITY OF KENAI P. O. SOX 5/0 KENAI. ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 2$3 • 71126 April 10, 1980 M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M TO: Mayor Vincent O'Reilly, Kenai City Council and Department Heads FROM: Kayo McGillivray, Director, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Mini -dome study I would like to invite you .to a.meeting"on Saturday, April 12, 10:00 a.m., at,the Kenai High Scho'al cafeteria. L6t v r The meeting wi.11,give the engineer's A. chance to discuss the proposed mini-domes•in Alaska.-; Kenai is,--isted as a community for a possible site. The legislatJre-pas approved money for a- study. This meetin.g, wil 1. be. par_t_�.o• -, that study, and it will include input `on"feas i bi 1 i ty and whiyj would like to see in- cluded in the structure. r 4 E� �6�� CITY OF KENAI " Od Gap" 4 44,mo4a„ P. O. SOX NO KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TREPNONE 283 . 753S JUNEAU SITUATION April 10, 1980 I. House and Senate Supplemental Appropriations House Appropriations out of committee and passed House. Senate Appropriation out of committee yesterday, to Senate today or tomorrow. House and Senate items have considerable discrepency, will have to be worked out in free conference which may start Friday, April 11 or Monday, April 14th. Overall amount appears to be $418,000,000. Using population as -a factor 1.25, Kenai City'on this basis should receive $5.225,000,,_�. II. City Capital Projects -at latest ;. y In Both Budgets Harbor Studies ! • ' $ 5,00,000 Commercial,Road Grid,/' •12,100,000 Care Center--," t� , • `� : jy'150, 000 Court Building • • • ,' 183,000 Kalifonsky/Bridge Road Int. 200,000 District Attorney Off.'' ,; 80,000 Public Defender : , ' ; .''�• J 1,700 3,214,700 Not In Budget Sewer & water to Sec. 36 $ 750,000 7,s-9 Youth Center & Sat Fire St.;ts-0 600,000 Airport Terminal Renovation 200,000 $1,350,000 8 April 10, 1980 Re: Juneau Situation Page 2 III. In Bond Issue Harbor $4,000,000 (Appears secure) Culture Center 5,100,000 (Probably in deep trouble. Our legislative group does not know how much of Anchorage and Juneau is satisfied with Cash Supplement, if those two areas are satisfied then Kenai will be in bond package with smaller cities and chance of bond passage without Anchorage and Juneau voters is dim.) IV. St. Revenue Sharing Still appears at 100% compared to present 75%. Ti-iis would increase City share from $166,758 to $221,834. V. Municipal Assistance Fund House put it at $11,400,000, should be $13,400,000 BASE and really should be $25,700,000 and then $41,700,000 For City this means: $145,965 at $11,400,000 171,567 at $13,400,000 329,049 at $25,700,000 533,915 at $41,700,000 Lt. Governor Miller said he will give this his personal attention, will talk with Governor and report back to City. Things To Do A. Our Senate District has approximately $22,000,000 allocated to it. (We are about 20% of District, so should receive $4,400,000) 1% 0 c r, April 10, 1980 Re: Juneau Situation Page 3 Included in $22,O00,C00 is $3,820,000 for the Homer Harbor, this project is really of State-wide implica- tions and effort should be made to shift to Governor's budget or indication by him that the $3,820,000 will not be counted against our Senate District allocation. S. Continue to: 1) hold Revenue Sharing at 100% 2) get some settlement on Municipal -- Assistance 1980 and 1980-81 funding and full funding 1981-82 C. On bond issues 1) bring a ton of back-up material to assure Harbor is included in bond issue 1980. Otherwise two years are missed. 2) Keep Kenai Culture Center included under any conditions with Anchorage and Juneau. Vincent O'Reilly Mayor VOR/md ! 11 Ted Forst and Associates Inc. 124 East Seventh Avenue • Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • 1907) 274-9517 P.O. Box 2470 • Soldotne, Alaska 996b9 • (90712624WM April 2, 1980 Mr. Vince O'Reilly, Mayor CITY OF MW P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Kenai Borough Airport Study Dear Mr. O'Reilly; I9e are in receipt of a copy of a letter you sent to Mr. Paul Larson regarding the proposed Kenai Borough Airport Study. There is apparently some confusion regarding the background of the letter we wrote to Mr. Gilman. This letter is written to provide some back- ground information to you and the City Council regarding this proposed Airport Study. By separate letter, (copy enclosed) we have submitted a detailed accounting of the work that we accomplished in the lobbying effort for ADAP grants for the City of Kenai. That subject is covered in detail in that letter, along with a bill for my services for that work. In your letter to Mr. Larson, you stated that there were never any recorded conversations between myself and the City of Kenai regarding a proposed Kenai Airort Systems Study. We had brief conversations with Mr. Charles Brm m on two occasions and one conversation with Mr. Jim Swalley and W. Keith Kornelis regarding this proposed project. These conversations were conducted to determine the city administration's preliminary feelings regarding an Airport Systems Study. Generally something that is of a preliminary nature can best be handled by coordination with the city's administration. S9e did not feel Council approval was required for this preliminary work. In your letter to Mr. Larson you also mentioned that there are a number of transportation and airport planning efforts underway which embrace the Kenai Airport. In our investigations for an airport systems study, it was pointed out to me by officials from the Federal Aviation Admini- stration and the State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - a Mr. Vince O'Reilly April 2, 1980 Page 2 that the detailed systems planning effort required for the Kenai Peninsula ..ould, in all probability, not be included in any proposed or current planning effort. Utilizing this information and advice from these two airport authori- ties, we felt that an airport systems study, specifically studying the Kenai and Soldotna Airports, would be of benefit not only to the Kenai Peninsula Borough, but to the City of Kenai and to the City of Soldotna. Ife sincerely hope that these comments will provide more information to yourself and the City Council on this proposed airport systems study. We are available to answer any additional questions that you or the Council may have on this subject. In closing, we would also like to comment that we feel our efforts in regards to obtaining ADAP grants for the Kenai Airport were somewhat successful. The FAA and the State are well aware of the needs that the Kenai Airport has at this time. Sincerely, TED FORSI AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -`4� - <4y Ted J. Forsi, P.E. Principal TJF;cs Enclosure cc: Paul Larson, FAA 1 1 1 1 1 Ted Forsi and Associa Inc. 124 East Seventh Avenue • Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • 1907) 274-9517 P.O. Box 2470 • Soldotna, Alaska 99669 • (907) 262-5531 April 1, 1980 Mr. Keith Kornelis Director of Public Works City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Final billing and justification report for work done lobbying for airport grants for Kenai Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Kornelis; The following is our final billing and justification report for the work completed in assisting the City of Kenai in obtaining Airport Development Aid program grants for improvements to the Kenai Municipal Airport. Please accept our apology for not submitting a written report sooner on this work. However, as can be seen by the total amount of the bill we did not reach the 10 hour maximum or $450.00 figure required in our contract for a report at this time. We have made several personal contacts with representatives from the Federal Aviation Administration and the State of Alaska Department of Transportation Public Facilities regarding grants for the Kenai Airport. Additionally, we had several conversations with your administration regarding progress on the grants for the Kenai Airport. We feel our efforts were beneficial to the City of Kenai. As you know the City has recently received a $405,000.00 grant for the upgrading of the Airport lighting system. Additionally, the FAA and the State are well aware of the other needs that you have at your airport. Summary of Work Accomplished and Billie Meetings with: Paul Larson, Jim Perham and Steve Kurth from the FAA, and Bill Hueners and Roger Head, State of Alaska DOT/PF Total 8.4 hrs. @ $45/hr. $ 370.00 Engineering • Planning • Surueying L • Mr. Keith Kornelis Page 2 We have sincerely appreciated the opportunity to assist. the City of Kenai with their ADAP program. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions, or would like further information on this billing and report. Sincerely, TED FORSI AND ASSSOOCIATES, INC. Ted J. Forsi, P.E. Principal TJF;cs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AN ju. ALASKAN REGION 701 C STREET BOX 14 ANCHORAGE. ALAS" 9012 A ;O iS Honorable Vincent O'Reilly Mayor, City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Bear Mayor O'Reilly: We want to thank you for your letter of March 20, 1980 concerning your interpretation and understanding of Mr. Ted Forsi's letter of February 19, 1980 to this office. Mr. Forsi's letter, as you know, concerned the merits of an airport system study which would include the airports at Kenai and Soldotna. We have attached a copy of our February 20, 1980 reply to Mr. Forsi's inquiry for your information. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me at 271-5442. Sincerely, PAUL A. LARSON Chief, Planning and Programs Branch Airports Division Enclosure z t c- : : 60 Mr. Ted Fors! Ted Forsi And Associstas, Inc. 124 Fast Seventh, Avenue Anelhorare, Alaska 39501 Airport Systet.w Stucq Incorporatiug Dear F.r. Torsi: the Cities of Kenai and Soldot nit It in tue policy of the Federal Aviation Admiuistration (FdA) to encourd;,_ air transportation pluuting stueLas similar to ti:osa de$criLed In your letter of Fabruar/ 19, 1930. Within fundin3 limitations and eligibility criteria, tito FAA nay also participate financially nrd technically in developing such plans. Ste recognize a reed to define t.:e roles of all o: the air?ort3 am t::e ianai Peninsula, especially Kenai Municipal and Soldotna Municipal air- ports. We are aware of the competitive nature of the airports at ntnai :] Solc otra and, froze a national airport (system port of vias:, it vould he daairabla . to conduct a reLional or system study of the area. We feel that suers a, study would rou3bly enco±Tars the area tdt:,in the xvnat rem. iasula 3orou:;h bouadarl. Ste do not feel that it would be appropriate or useful to include Kodiak In the study as you proposed. :iodf:^3: is more closaly tied to the Alaska Peninsula/Bristol Bay area t%an to Lisa Kenai Feninsuta in tees of aero- nautical activity. The co==nities affected b7 a regional study would have to becowe intimately involved in developing the stud; if any benefit was to be derived frog the resultant product. The input anal concurrence of Kenai and Soldotna s:ould be of particular itiportance. because o` long range implications vitas respect to tits future rolo and development of vie tiro airports and t1*air ralation- ship to each other. If we can be of furti:er service to you, do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, PAUL A. LAY.,SON Chief, Planting b Progrwas :;ranch Airports Division AAL--613:SKurth.sib: 2/27/80 U �—. !� �,� _ f.�,�r�..w._--,_�..__._. „_ — — �; �� __�—_.--t-�----- - i ,� — -- t! �; �! s` 1 ,, ; ;�'' -�-i-- --- -- -- -- -. T -, �� , � � i �I=� i4' � ;I Y- - -- --- -i• - - i ��. ,_ _ _ _� —_ - i' - ' t !!!( _� .„ S - . . ,��. i �. C , -�4_ _ ,` _— � l� 1} L: ;' �I.: {' �; •�81��' � I � , i'S t t .e�=,. i +Tb � t1 � !0 —� i 23.45.030-23.45.060 performance evaluation report completed by each rating officer under his jurisdiction before the report is dis- cussed with the employee. The reviewing officer shall consider the performance evaluations completed by the rating officer in evaluating the rating officer's performance. 23.45.040 Review of Performance Reports: The rating officer shall discuss the performance evaluation report with the employee before the report is made part of the employee's permanent record. If the rating officer plans to recommend the denial of an in -grade salary increment or recommend an extraordinary increment, the report must be discussed with the reviewing officer and the City Manager prior to review with the employee. 23.45.050 Unsatisfactory Evaluation: Employees who receive an overall rating of "unsatisfactory" on their annual evaluation shall not be eligible to receive an in - grade salary increment. Employees who receive two con- secutive overall ratings of "unsatisfactory" shall be subject to dismissal. 23.45.060 Performance Evaluation Appeal Procedure: Employees' performance evaluation reports shall not be subject to the standard grievance procedure. Employees shall have the right to appeal their evaluation in accordance with the following procedure: (a) Step 1, If, after a review of his performance evaluation report with the rating officer, the employee feels that the report is unfair, he may request a meeting with the reviewing officer by checking the appropriate section on the report. The rating officer will then immediately forward the report to the reviewing officer who will arrange to meet with the employee within 5 working days after receiving the report. The reviewing officer will then forward a decision in writing to the employee within 5 working days after the date of their meeting. (b) Step 2, In the event that the employee is dissatisfied with the decision of the reviewing officer, he may within 5 working days of receipt of the decion appeal his performance evaluation report, in writing, to the City Manager. The City Manager shall within 5 working days meet and discuss the report with the employee. The City Manager will, in writing, make a decision within 10 working days from the date of their meeting. The decision of the City Manager will be final. 23-25