HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-02-17 Council PacketCITY OF KENAI
START
OF
ROLL
NON /6
DATES d74q- &
THE MICROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES APPEARING
IN THIS ROLL OF MICROFILM STARTING WITH
RECORD FILE •NOs
ARE ACCURATE RAPYWhUCTIONS OF THE
RECORDS OF �THE/1C�ITY OF KEWAI.
DEFT
1, the undersigned, Janet Whelan, City Clerk of the City of Kenai, AK,
a municipal corporation, in the performance of the functions of say off-
ice, hereby certify that the original camera negative microfilm images
contained on this roil up to the and target, are direct and facsimile
reproductions of the original documents. All documents were filmed com-
plete in their aatisaty.
i certify to the above to the bels of my knowledge and belief.
CERTIFIED EYs DATE: 1% ,Dq_9(
net Whelan, City Clerk
War oR.000./'o. aw
A ' asn.9ooa
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE MICROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES APPEARING ON THIS
ROLL OF MICROFILM ARE ACCURATE REPRODUCTIONS OF THE RECORDS OF THE CITY
OF KENAI AND WERE MICROFILMED IN THE REGULAR COURSE OF BUSINESS PURSUANT
TO ESTABLISHED ROUTINE COMPANY POLICY FOR SYSTEMS UTILIZATION AND ARE
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION OF SUCH RECORDS THROUGH THE STORAGE
OF SUCH MICROFILMS IN PROTECTED LOCATIONS,
IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSES USED FOR MICRO—
FILMING OF THE ABOVE RECORDS WERE ACCOMPLISHED IN A MANNER AND ON MICRO—
FILM WHICH MEETS THE RECOMMENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU
OF STANDARDS FOR PERMANENT MICROPHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTIONS.
CERTIFIED BYs DATEs
A RICHARDS
MICROFILM MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
NOTICE
ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF THESE
DOCUMENTS IS DUE TO THE POOR
QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. THE
FAULT DOES NOT LIE WITH THE
CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR.
Kenai City Council
Meeting Packet
February 17, 1982
AMENDED AGENDA
KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 17, 1982 - 7:00 PM
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
A.
ROLL
CALL
1.
Agenda Approval
B.
PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
1.
Mr. & Mrs. John Stoehner - Change of Leases
Rejected b, Planning & Zoning Commission
2.
Atty. Ted Carson - Small Boat Harbor
3.
Joe Langston, City Cab Co. - Definition of
City Licensing Structures
L,4'.-
Jackie Russell - Coyles's Property
C.
PUB IC HEARINGS
k; ;-
Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify
Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda at
Council Meetings
Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300
r'
3.
Resolution 82-2-1 - Transfer of Funds - Provide
Monies for Alaska 1984 Participation
�.
Resolution 82-22 - Transfer of Funds - Airport
Term. Renovation & Expansion - $55,388
5.
Water & Sewer Rates
6.
Transfer of Liquor Licence - San Pan Riastaurant
& Lounge
D.
MINUTES
1.
Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1982
E.
CORRESPONDENCE
1.,
Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title
29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning &
Land Use Regulations
2.
DEC - Smoking in Public Places
F.
OLD BUSINESS
1.
Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar &
Harborview Restaurant
2.
Library Renovation
G. NEW BUSINESS
1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000
` 3. Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
��^�''' Preparation of Plans & Specs for Airport Parking
Lots - $30,500
` 4. Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
�1�" Preliminary Engineering & Preparation - Float
Plane Basin - $5,300
5. Re -Evaluation of Latouche Island Resolution
82-3
6. Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill & City of
Kenai Sludge Disposal
7. Li3cussion - Proposal for.Re-Appraisal of Twenty.
City -Owned Lots
H. REPORTS
1. City Manager
2. City Attorney
3. Mayor (i�
4. City Clerk Q)
5. Finance Director
6. Planning & Zoning
7. Harbor Commission
I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
ADJOURNMENT
Ij-
--:• . ,_y�.. :�- ram- -- � .. _
1
1
lACLARION"
FEBRUARY.18,1982
Landfill,
waTer, sewer and
,i. Tasks `84 to be discussed
A discussion on the future
of the Boroagh Landfill In
'Kenai,
'landfill on Redoubt Street,
According to a letter from
bees Kenai Kenai will not .gc-
cept septic tank waste from
public hearings on.
water and 9ewer rate
City 4tgineerJack Who
'
noncity residents at the new
changes and liarticipatlon in
to the cityy manager, .the
borough
treatment plant. � LaShot
„
Alaska 1984 top'the agendahesitated
for the Kenai Csty Council
. administration has
about allowing the
disposal because of the City
said,
A public hearing will be
held on a resolution to spend
xhfsweek•
The council meets at 7
CMCU's protest last month
of a five-year permit
$2,000 for- the city's par -
ticipation and planning in
P.M.. Wedrae y in, City
Hall. _ `
renewal on the site issued by
the Alaska,, 1994 statehood
The'Cily to dj$bosb ,
the state Department of
Environmental Con-
celebration. The $2,boo is
. supposed to be'refunded by
Of sludge from its sewage
servation.
Alaska 1984. The council will
treatment plant at the
The borcuSb also hesitated
also hear a report of thelocal
ellAl Comed agenda
Alaska w4committee.
A hearing will also be held
on the
.:
city's revision of
.
water and sewer rates. The
The Kenai City Council
meet: Wednesday "at 71 m.
plication, Rainbow Bar and
Harberview Restaurant. ;
monthly residential water
rate Is scheduled to drop
W City Hall. .M_-'sbreWated
-Libraryrenovation,
from $12 to $7.90.
Bandi►loj1C�
-- --
D. M V BUSINESS
SCHEDULE
—Plans for :airport ,
PRESENTATi6ft
parking,$30,M.
�;iSiai artd ChrL t3Wetmer
..,—PreUminary engineers.
onaAirpaetle3sess * ng for- Oast plane basin.
- -Ted Carson as small
':$SAO
bo�athaebor."
—Reconsideration of
d0e Las Wton on -,,city
resolution oppossing
•,
. '
Latoache Harbor con-
_
B,Py13LiCREAti1N(iS.
WrtaCRlon.
- Discusfson of .'UM&W
-4vmwer, at Ituads 10r.,.4wQdytlgedtspowiL
A1s�ka iei4prtieipatlon. `
—Diseui;slorr o! reap-
•�-Waterandseivaraites ., ;;praisarataity>�,
ADMINiSTRA3'10N
-
- !!nos=Acepse =ap.
F. MDUCC010fENT3
i
_ �.j,_
I
`—
��
�r�
_
i
�,: . a
✓ �,�
� .=
I�
vo
C,
OA)
T�
AGENDA
KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 17, 1982 - 7t00 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A.
ROLL CALL
1.
Agenda Approval
B.
PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
1.
Mr. 6 Mrs. John Stoehner - Change of Leases
Rejected by Planning i Zoning Commission
2.
Atty. Ted Carson - Small Beat Harbor
3.
Joe Langston, City Cab Co. - Definition of
City Licensing Structures
C.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.
Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify
Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda at
Council Meetings
2.
Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300
3.
Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - Provide
Monies for Alaska 1984 Participatior
4.
Resolution 82-22 - Transfer of Funds - Airport
Term. Renovation i Expansion - $55,368
5.
water i Sewer Rates
6.
Transfer of Liquor License - Sam Pan Restaurant
i Lounge
D.
MINUTES
1.
Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1982
E.
CORRESPONDENCE
1.
Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title
29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning i
Land Use Regulations
2.
DEC - Smoking in Public Places
F.
OLD
BUSINESS
1.
Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar i
Harborview Restaurant
2.
Library Renovation
G.
NEW
BUSINESS
1.
Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
2.
Requisitions Exceeding $1,000
3.
Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Preparation of Plans i Specs for Airport Parking
Lots - $30,500
4.
Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Preliminary Engineering a Preparation - Float
Plane Basin - $5,300
S.
Re -Evaluation of Latouche Island Resolution
82-3
6.
Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill 6 City of
Kenai Sludge Disposal
7.
Discussion - Proposal for Re -Appraisal of Twenty
City -owned Lots
J
!
H. REPORTS
1. City Manager
2. City Ap�orney
3. Mayor
+�wr�M+.�a: " ••;:.;,; 4. City Clerk
S. Finance Director
6. Planning i Zoning
7. Harbor Commission
r
I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
ADJOURNMENT
... Viz:.;^ �_: _ -• - .
.-%U'. fz
64,
i
f
Y
1
l
f ,
ti
t '
1
i
e)
q r
l c i c jf Ci ri c
COUNCIL L NW. i, a OF
J
COUNCIL MEETING OF ___�,� / 7 , / Y,pa
NOTICE
PLEASE DISREGARD PREVIOUS IMAGE.
DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REFILMED ON
FOLLOWING FRAME.
a�
' ,,,,.,,may;' .•r'... • ww...y
AGENDA
"• .� ••».--.3•
KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
i! •Cr'� -' ., ,' =�" ::'
FEBRUARY 17, 1982 - 700 00 PM
• ?'" - =� • "K,.-�
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
.-_ '=
- "'' `'
.: • -
A.
ROLL CALL
1.
Agenda Approval
B.
PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
'''' �r
'-.'i
1.
Mr. i Mrs. John Stoehner - Change of Leases
r -�„-:•
Rejected by Planning i Zoning Commission
-�
2.
Atty. Ted Carson - Small Be -at Harbor
3.
Joe Langston, City Cab Co. -Definition of
City Licensing Structures
C.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.
Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify
Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda at
Council Meetings
• -•
2.
Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
overtime for Firc Dept. - $1a,300
.= "•;- -
3.
Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - Provide
Monies for Alaska 1984 Participation
;.;.«+
4.
Resolution 82-22 -Transfer of Funds -Airport
:e...':°'"' ,'.'•
Term. Renovation E Expansion - $55, 388
S.
Water i Sewer Rates
6.
Transfer of Liquor License - Sam Pan Restaurant
i Lounge
D.
MINUTES
�.. 'L`��' ��� '• `-
1.
Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1992
E.
CORRESPONDENCE
•^" :�:,'''- -
1.
Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title
..
29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning i
Land Use Regulations
2.
DEC - Smoking in Public Places
F.
OLD
BUSINESS
�;.
1.
Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar i
Harborview Restaurant
-
2.
Library Renovation
G.
NEW
BUSINESS
1.
Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
2.
Requisitions Exceeding $1,000
3.
Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
- • -
Preparation of Plans i Specs for Airport Parking
Lots - $30,500
4.
Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Preliminary Engineering & Preparation - Float
Plane Basin - $5,300
5.
Re -Evaluation of Latouche island Resolution
82-3
6.
Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill S City of
Kenai Sludge Disposal
7.
Discussion - Proposal for Re -Appraisal of Twenty
City -Owned Lots
H. REPORTS
1. City Manager
2 City At,�orney
3: Mayor ,
4. City Clark 74-
5. Pinance Director
6. Planning & Zoning
7. Harbor Commission
I- PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
ADJOURNMENT
11
In
f.
n, will
e-'
LAM
1: !
COUNCIL ME. . TtNr, nF _ q
/�
RION
M
on
unweenne
mamma
no
.� ..
on
uncommon
MO4M,
F7
VAMME
MEMMEMEMMEMEMEMEME
J
J
COUNCIL MEETING OF 7 PP.?
1
'.i
i
.1,
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 1
Meeting of January 27, 1982
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Request for lease modification from Chris Stoehner/Arctic Aviation
Phil Bryson - the next item for business is a request of a lease modification
from Chris Stoehner Arctic Aviation. Chris and John Stoehnor, John
is here to represent Arctic Aviation. John would you could you go
through your project generally first.
John Stoehner - Mr. Chairman, members of the Planing and 'Zoning Commission.
Arctic Aviation is proposed or has asked for an amendment to its lease
on lot 1 block 3 of the general aviation apron. This, lease property
has been used ever since its development for strictly a tie down for
small general aviation aircraft. We're requesting the change of this
to allow a building to be put on this peice of property and to be
utilized by two lessees one of them being my wife Chris Stoehner with
Northern Lights its a company by the name of Northern Lights Fisheries.
Northern Lights Fisheries has been in existence for about 4 years and
clam processing sounds kind of yukky but ah, its been a viable business
now for four years and what we're trying to do on that is to draw her
in to a closer proximity with the rest of our enterprises here with
Arctic Aviation and Arctic Fuel Services and our other holdings and
interest that we have going. For the past years she has had to lease
facilities from various other canneries namely Doris Lashly from Sea
Catch, Rolland Schwanke with Seafoods of Alaska they're out in Sterling.
This create: last summer quite a few problems for us, she has some
technical equipment that she uses in her processing plant which I am
probably the firemost world authority in the state of Alaska on this
equipment I have been out there numerous times to have to repair it,
it seems to pick the wrong times to break down and unfortunately the
height of her business also happens to be the height of Arctic Aviation's
business and namely during the fish haul season so it draws me away from
the business of Arctic Aviation and the fueling facilities which I am
having to control and monitor here at the Kenai Peninsula Airport and
drive to where ever she is doing her business which last year was
Sterling which involves an hours' drive just to get out there and
back to the airport plus my time involved in working with her problems.
So what we're trying to do here is to centrally locate our concerns,
also the other half of the building we are proposing at this time ah,
myself and my Kent Holland utilizing the additional space in this
building for establishing a machine shop. Now the world is flooded
with machine shops but this particular machine shop will be a specialty,
it will meet a requirement that is not fulfilled inside the state of
Alaska at this time it's a machine shop th.,c will be able to chrome
cyllinders we're talking aircraft cyllinders bore these cyllinders,
weld the cyllinder heads, ah remove and replace valve gu, ah valve
seats and weld crank cases, line bore these cases dater they've been
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 2
Meeting of January 27, 1982
welded (inaudible). At the present time any of this work has to be
sent stateside. This not only creates a delay factor for the consumer
it also creates a increase cost in having to ship these parts outside.
I would say roughly the cost of sending a cyllinder a single cyllinder
out ah, to a repair station outside the state of Alaska at this time
to be roughly one hundred dollars, fifty dollars each way air freight.
And if I specify air freight because these components on an airplane
represent down time for an airplane. The airplane is down it's of
no value to its operator and owner. So, ah, what we are proposing
here is a machine shop that is capable of doing this work inside the
state of Alaska resulting in a, a benefit to roughly all the operators
and aircraft owners in the state. Ah, I'm sorry I didn't get this
paper work in to you in time so you would probably take it home and
read over what we have proposed, ah, I tried to answer as many questions
that 1 could think of at the time with ah, with my, ah, written synopsis
of the proposed operation.
Phil Bryson - do you have more than one lease lot leased right now.
John Stoehner - yes, we have three ah, three lots that are leased on the
airport
Phil Bryson - which
CJohn Stoehner - they're all ajacent to each other
Phil Bryson - lots 1 and 2 of block 1 and block, lot 1 of block 3.
John Stoehner - yes
Phil Bryson - and your proposing a facility on lot 1 block 3
John Stoehner - that's correct
Phil Bryson - and there are no buildings presently on
John Stoehner - there are no building$ on that lot. Now this lot does not,
?i 1 might add, this lot does not adjoin the taxi way and it is a back
lot with ah, this access gained from Beaver Loop. And so the lot, the
building will be situated such ah, I'm sorry I don't believe when
the, drawings gave out there I showed that
(inaudible) Several people talking, presumable describing the drawing
- John Stoehner - (beginning of tape, part of sentence missing) ah, main line of
sewer will be taken this spring. We hope to tie into the water and
sewer with this facility also with this facility at the time (inaudible)
that will preclude us digging up some pavement after they've got it
paved and everything else if we can do this on a timely basis.
{•._ Lee Lewis - you mentioned the fact that you process the ah, you know
processing the clams requires some specific obligations I guess nn
the sewer
r
a
f
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 3
Meeting of January 27, 1982
John Stoehner - oh, ok, on on my ah, synopsis there I did indicate that
we would be using roughly six thousand gallons during an eight- hour
period of processing. Ok, we will install sand traps it will be a
sand trap and a influent trap prior to the ah, sewage going into the
sewer line. Yes, now this will be a pump out trap. Now we've used
this ah, with ah, out at ah, the Brinkly plant we had last summer,
ah that we leased from Rollin Schwanke. We just, we had to pour a
slab with a sunken trap then the water would flow across the top,
sands influence and stuff would settle out into it and then we could
pump this out or bail it out and ah, we had no problems with the
sewer, and there we were using a regular septic system. So we had
no problems with the septic system, that we had out there by using
this ah, this trap.
Wayne Regelin - this trap collect not only the sand and the shells but
the soft tissue of the clam
John Stoehner - soft tissue that would be suspended in the water no. They
they wouldn't be heavy enough to say flow out but there would be very
little of that ah, the way that they are processed the women are working
the people that are doing the cleaning are using the bowls and they're
cleaning right into a bowl. This bowl is then dumped into a different
container and then the container is taken out and dumped separately.
This isn't dumped into the sewer system at all.
Phil Bryson - how many employees do you anticipate
John Stoehner - at one point last summer, my wife had over 200 employees.
This is including the people across the inlet that are doing the ah,
digging for the clams and people that she had hired for the cannery.
Phil Bryson - I'm more interested just the ah, ah, the cleaning operation
at the airport
John Stoehner - ah, I would say roughly fifty. Fifty employees, it would
be on this side rather
Jim Blanning - arn't the PBO lots arn't they restricted to aircraft use,
ah, I thought, are those the lots that the FAA has put the restriction
on
Jim Swalley - my understanding is they are restricted to aeronautical activities
Jim Blanning - where does that leave us, does that preclude a clam processing
plant
John Stoehner - the other thing that I forgot to mention in, is all of this
product is flown. It's brought in across the inlet by aircraft and once
its processed that is going for human consumption it is flown out and
this has, its ah, amounted to quite a bit of money just for the transportation
services of this product, not only for Arctic Aviation who is the primary
C
3
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 4
Meeting of January 27, 1982
John Stoehner - (continued) contractor needless to say but even for the
other ah, FBO's on the airport and aft, they have used Beetlefold,
Southcentral Air, even Kenai Aviation for transportation and ah, a
large percentage of it has gone out on Wein Air, through their air
cargo space and the majority of it has gone into Anchorage so to be
shipped out on Western because they do have ah, ah midnight flight
that makes straight connections to the, ah, where the majority of the
product does go. Ah Oregon. But ah, it is the operation and the way
that it functions, is very much tied in to aviation and and does
require aviation or aircraft
Phil Bryson - the ah, the machine shop isn't addressed in the ah, in your
site, your building floor plan
John Stoehner - its ah, in the written ah, development that 1 wrote up and
submitted, it is addressed ah, its a two page typed
Phil Bryson - ok, yea, I got it
John Stoehner - our ah, the problems that we're running into this, is its
a fairly new venture for Mr. Holland and myself, we've been working
on it now for about a month and ah, what we're waiting for at this
moment is I have written to ah, government publications in Washington
D.C. and have requested some tech orders and millstech publications from
them and I'm waiting on these to be sent to me so that I can write what
is known as an operations manual. This operations manual is needed
by FAA ah, they will have to take it and study it and approve this
manual before we can be certified and issue a repair station license
for doing this work. Unfortunately there are businesses in the state
that do this kind of work and they have their operations manual and
even though FAA has copies of these operations manual, it's still
private property and so it's not a matter of me writting off to FAA
and saying hey, send me electro chome plating's operation manual cause
I want to operate like they do. It's not that easy I have, we have to
write our own manual
Phil Bryson - Jack ah, could you address the impact on the City's sewer
system
Jack LaShot - well, our new sewage plant, well our old one for that matter
too, was not geared for any type of processing facility. I talked to
Mrs. Stoehner just before Christmas about this but I haven't heard
from her since then, but ah, she was the last time I talked to her looking
in to getting some documentation that (inaudible) wouldn't be harmful
and I have talked with a fellow from D.E.C. who said if properly screened
VRRBATIM 'rRANsLAT10N Page 5
Meeting of January 27. 1982
Jack LaShot - (continued) properly. screens were properly maintained, then
it shouldn't be too much of a problem, however, in order to be sure
I think there needs to be some more research done on that. Also,
(inaudible) the load shouldn't be much greater than a typical restraunt
(inaudible)
John Stoehner - its not very', the load is not very much, 6,000 gallons is
not that much
Jack LaShot - over what time period
John Stoehner - in ah, eight hours. And that, 1 think 6,000 is on the high
side. Ah, unlike the fish processing plant, we don't have constantly
running water, ah over the product, with a clam, unfortunately the more
you wash it the less it tastes. It washes all the taste out of one all
you wind up is a piece of rubber and this is one of the problems that
we ran into last year, ah in trying to conform to one department of
agricultures inspectors wishes we ran water over the product continuously
so there was water running across the tables, ah, the people were doing
the work it was running over they're hands and this is not warm tempered
water it was cold water coming right straight out of the well and ah,
we got some: very unfavorable reception to this product, people were
are ultimate consumer was writing back and telling us the stuff was
tasteless and ah, it was washed out, but ah, in researching the regulations
we found out that this was not a requirement that this was one inspectors
personal ah, wish that we did it so we did discontinue that and we have
gone back to just using the bowls and what this is is when the product
is put into these bowls they're filled with water, and so, the product
is submerged but its not a running water and the product is cleaned
in these bowls and then the bowls are of course dumped. Ah after the
product is processed. And ah so, ah, the gal may be working 10 - 15
minutes with this one bowl and the same water so, the water is not
constantly changing over like ah, like with fishing industry down
here where everything is moved by water and, the whole ah, the whole
•"
system is based on this running water. Ours is not.
Phil Bryson - are the people you hire, is this a, is this a skill or is it
more like a herring squeezing; operation is it something
+
John Stoehner - its a skill. Its ah, ah, the cleaners are are using a a
little knife like a paring knife and ah it is a skill cleaning these
little devils, if it came down to the point that I wanted to eat clams
and I had to go over across the inlet dig 'am bring 'am back over here
and clean 'am and then cook, I'd rather pay my wife and go buy it and
pay her price. A lot easier. But ah, some of these some of the gals
paid on a peice meal basis they make upwards to $15 to $18 an hour.
So its not its not ah, a, job that somebody's going; to just, you know
-
try it one time and
Phil Bryson - yea, your not going to pick kids off the street to be doing this.
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 6
Meeting of January 27, 1982
t John Stoehner - she has ah, gals n<,w that have been working for her for
four years. That started out with and they're still
Phil Bryson - Wayne
Wayne Regelin - I'd like Mr. Delahay if all of our discussion is really
necessary if it's illegal
Ben Delahay - I don't think it is, ah, if I may Mr. Chairman
Phil Bryson - go ahead
Ben Delahay a I don't like to be disagreable or or try to throw road blocks
in the way of improvements or development but there are a number of
reasons why I could not recommend this the first being is, as mentioned
it is not within any possible meaning a an airport related activity.
The fact that the clams may be flown in and the product may be flown
out is not ah, controlling. If it were then anything could be airport
related from making shoes to growing hot house tomatoes, ah just the
fact that its going to be on an airplane or it has been on an airplane
does not make it an airport related activity. Ah, the machine shop
itself of course with working on airplane engines would be. And
certainly if its not available in Alaska something like that should be
encouraged ah, if that were all it were and I can sympathize with Mr.
Stoehner's desire to concentrate the activities of his family so that
i it would be more efficient for him but that is not sufficient for this
body or the council to approve something that would be antagonistic not
only to any possible ruling the FAA might make but also as to what the
council has said about holding these properties on the airport for
airport related facilities. I have other opposition however in addition
to that and that is that my office has found Arctic Aviation uncooperative
unresponsive and irrisponsible in the conduct of two of the leases they
have now. In one of them, lot 1 block 1 of GAA, they were written a
Letter on May 20th, 1980 with an amendment to their lease for renegotiation
of the rental rate which was due July first 1980. There was no response
to that letter. There was another letter, this was sent certified mail
there was another dated July 25th 1980 reminding them that the amendment
had not been returned. There was no my file shows no response to that
Letter. In September of 1980 there was ah, letter written from finance
ah, relating to some oral statement that she had received I believe from
Mrs. Stoehner claiming that Mr. Stoehner had made a protest to this ah,
rent increase ah, at some meeting, I believe with the Planning and
Zoning Commission, naw the council
John Stoehner - the city council
Ben Delahay, - ah, the minutes of that city council meeting were examined
and it was found that Mr. Stoehner had ah, asked to be heard but had
not appeared. Ah, and Mrs. Parnell in writing this letter suggested
they make a letter of written protest which of course then would be
J
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 7
Meeting of January 27, 1982
Ben Delahay - (continued) available and would be in the ah, file. There
was no written answer to this letter. March 19, 1981, there was
another letter noting a delinquency in their leases of some 2400
dollars. Ah, and warning of cancellation. Ah, evidently there was
no response to this letter. In May 19, 26th 1981, ah there was
another letter regarding return of amendment ah, on June second 1981,
I wrote a letter ah, because I had heard I'd been shown this letter
of ah, from finance saying that there had been some or made a claim
of some oral protest, I wrote them a letter and asked them either
return the amendment or start to negotiate that is was their respons-
ibility to negotiate if they didn't agree and if they wished to
negotiate that we had hired a an appraiser a registered appraiser
to appraise this property and if they had any objection they should
get an appraiser of their own choosing to appraise it and if there
was a difference we could negotiate the difference. To date I have
_
had no response to this letter which was written in June of last
year. Ah, the rate that Arctic Aviation is paying on that land
is $926.82 a year and anything under $2400 dollars a year is supposed
to be paid in advance on July first. Ah, the rate of the amendement
after an and I don't believe that this has been negotiated since 1966
there has been no change in it. The amendment requested a rate of
-
$2640 starting July first 1980. At the time that the letter was written
about these delinquencies they were delinquent ah, since that time they
�. have brought they have been paying the old rate not the new rate not
J the proposed rate but the old rate they have come in and made monthly
payments until they have caught up with all of their delinquencies
based on their old rates. They have still as far as 1 know made no
negotiations they have made no attempt to talk with me they have
made no appraisals. 0n ah, lot 2 in block 1 it came up for renegotiation
and for July first 1981 this last year there was a certified letter
sent out from the city on March 26,1981 and the that rate had been
previously amended in 197 lets see 197t it must have been to $2,000
! a year. The amendment brought would bring this up to $3,000 a year.
Again there was no response to this letter. There was a city letter
of reminder went out May 26th 81 reminding them that the amendment
had not been returned there was no response to that letter. There
was a another letter went out June second and there was a response
-
to that letter, by Arctic dated June the fifth 81. Ah, there was
'r
also a letter in the first lease dated June fifth 8l ah, I don't know
it didn't refer to which lot but it just it merely said in two brief
paragraphs that they were protesting and something about ah, the city
attorney has acknowledge our oral protest as to new lease rates, this
letter will also serve as written protest, we are joining other leasees
in efforts to determine a fair and just rate. The lease they have
with the city doesn't say anything about joining other lessees they
are to negotiate with the city. And this they have completly failed
"rr
to do. Ah, as long as the leases are not they have two leases that
r it+
� s
M
C.
t
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 8
Meeting of January 27, 1982
Bon Delahay - (continued) are not in good standing with the city. I would
oppose granting any time of modification or any new lease to Arctic
Aviation. i believe that at one time there was also an application
of either Arctic or Mr. and Mrs. Stochner, ah to lease lot 1 and 2
of FBO Subdivision. As L remember it they failed to go through with
that until some other Marty came in with a lease offer on 1 and 2
and then they came in with an attorney and loudly protesting saying
they were first and with the consent of the other party who agreed to
move down, either two or three lots I forget just how many were involved,
ah, they were allowed to come in and make application and their application
was pursued and then when it come came to the final stop of getting a
lease, they never went through with it. The other party got leases
to 1 don't know, 4, 5, and 6 was it and there were no leases on 1.2
and 3. Ah, this scams to be consistent with the conduct of their
business affairs now, I don't know how much of this is related to
economic circumstances. There may be a great deal of it. But that
does not excuse the fact that they have not performed and basically
what is before you now is something that I feel is against city policy,
its against FAA policy in so far as a fish plant a clam processing
plant is concerned and, I do not believe it would be wise for the city
to consider any such modification as long as Arctic Aviation has not
lived up to the terms of their leases on the other two leases to lots
1, and 2 in block onu, in fact if I don't hear from someone pretty
soon about this its going to be a matter of sueing to cancel both
of those leases for failure to perform according to terms of the leases.
Phil Bryson - any other comments
Jim Blanning - I'm a little confused ah, this is called a lease modification
is that that correct is this a lease modification or this is an original
or a reapplication. I went back to some of my old notes and find that
they had applied for lots 1, 2, and 3 in FBO Subdivision in 1979 and
at that time they had asked for it for tie downs of aircraft and
devosloped into a complete seafood processing facility fuel service
warehousing and tie downs. Complete seafood processing facilities
was lined out apparently and I guess he improved it but subsequently
as Mr. Delahay says, in correspondence with their lawyer, the last
word I had on it was, ah, the lawyer says for the foregoing reasons
my client must reject the city's counteroffer and I guess itwas never
I guess the lease was never consumated is that correct
Ben Delahay - that's correct. Now what is proposed here is a modification
of the lease to lot 1 block 3 and this lease, ah incidentaly should
be coming up for renegotiation the first of July of this year 1982.
But the purposes for which the lease is issued are aircraft parking
and storage. So to do anything else they need a modification. Even
VERIIATIM TRANSLATION Page 9
Meeting of January 27, 1982
Ben Delahay - (continued_) for a machine shop.
Phil Bryson - does that clarify your
Jim Blanning - well I guess I guess on our lease application lot description
is blank hero, ah, and it wasn't clear to me just what lots they were
asking for. So apparently its just lot 1
Phil Bryson - lot 1 of block 3, general aviation
Jim Blanning - they're asking for r. modification
Phil Bryson - other comments
John Stoehner - I ah
Phil Bryson - go ahead John
John Stoehner - ok, ah, Mr., your name?
Phil Bryson - Delahay
John Stoehner - yea, Delahay, I'm sorry, definitely done his homework. Ah,
is it correct we did make lease application on lots 1, 2, and 3 ah,
north of the terminal up there. And our initial ah, application we
"did propose putting this ah, processing plant the same as I'm trying
to do right now. And this was rejected by the city, at that time we
didn't have very much knowledge of how much affluence, how much water,
and and things like this we were going to be running through and the
city became concerned that ah, there would be too much for the system
to handle. And so we did amend the lease application and ah, true
enough we were granted this application with our amendment to ah, not
put in the processing plant. We were granted that in January the middle
of the winter, with a lease rate of sixteen hundred dollars a month.
And we were expected to pay this starting in January. Now we went back
and we asked the city to amend thisand allow us then to start the lease
application effective I believe in July at a time of the year when we
could get in and clear the property, get it stabilized and ah, where it
could become productive. Not in the middle of winter paying sixteen
hundred dollars a month as Mr. Delahay pointed out I'm not a rich man
otherwise my ah, leases would not be in arrears, but ah, sixteen hundred
dollars a month was just a little bit too much to try and bite off. And
ah I, at this point I thank the city council for not ah, amending it
and allowing me to take those lots because I would at this point in time
I would definitely be in trouble because our whole economy in this area
especially around the airport has been alot of downhill slide. This
is also one of the reasons why you don't see me trying to expand my
flight department and putting in aircraft sales or ah, or enlarging the
J
VERBATIM TRANSLATION
Meeting of January 27, 1982
Page 10
John Stoehner - (continued) flight school because its not there. I have
come in now tonight and asking for a amendment to this lease to put
in the facilities that I know will work. I know its viable cause I've
been in it four years. Thank you.
Ben Delahay - Mr. Chairman
Phil Bryson - yes
Ben Delahay - on that point Mr. Stoehner's correct, ah, as to that, as I
remember the council did code back and offer to delay starting that
lease and Mrs. Click can correct me if I'm wrong on about March the
first on the grounds that as of that date they could start clearing
that land and there were trees all over it in order to be ready for
construction when it could start in either May or June so that they
could get on the land and start rather than delaying to the first of
July, ah, so the city did offer to meet them half way but.
Phil Bryson - what are the desires of the commission
Jim Blanning - I would think with the the FBO restrictions, ah, right there
would would conclude (inaudible)to a clam processing plant and In
addition to the apparent unresolved difficulties with the city
/ administration I would think we have problems approving the application
`. as submitted
Phil Bryson - are there any lots ah, reasonably adjacent to the airport
that would ah, conform to such an ah clam operation that could be
purchased. We're ah, assuming that the ah, clamming is acceptable
to the ah, operation of the sewer system
Ben Delahay - I would have to review the zoning commission as to zoning,
restrictions I, I'm not sure about industrial ah, zoning lots near
there, ah, I know they're commercial but whether they're industrial
I just don't know. Ah, there arn't any lots ah, in the immediate
vicinity, there may be some in the subdivision available ah, ah, just
east of the airport off of ah, Willow Street, over on Trading Bay
Road or somewhere in that area
Phil Bryson - Cook Inlet Industrial
Ben Delahay - I'm not sure whether all the lots in there are taken or not
and I'm not sure of the zoning of those lots. Jim are you aware
Jim Swalley - the area your talking Trading Bay that is light industrial.
Ah, I have to admit I am remiss, I've got an appointment or semi -
appointment with the Administrative Assistant for the last two days
and due to commitments we couldn't get together to try to explore if
there are other properties available for this type of a ah venture.
r
VERBATIM TRANSLATION
Meeting of January 27, 1982
Page 11
Jim Swalley - (continued) not necessarily on airport lands but, rah. tho
city owns many other lands also. And ah, like I say, we had an
(inaudible) get together either yesterday afternoon or this afternoon
but her time and my time didn't coincidu to do this. But ah, the
city does own other lands, if they are properly zoned in the right
district or suitable of this type venture I don't know. Ah there is
a possibility like Mr. Delahay says that ah, there could ah, be on other
airport lands also. It would take research on this matter
Ben Delahay - its a matter of availability, again I'm relaying on memory
but it appears to me that those lots in there are either sold or
leased or they're pretty well taken up. And ah, but, I, my second
objection the first one of course is the use of the airport for non -
related (change of tape)
Phil Bryson - is snyone prepared to make a motion? Wayne
Wayne Regelin - yes, all motions have to be in a positive manner and 1 make
a motion that we approve the lease, Arctic Aviation, ail, for ah, clam
processing plant on subdivision ah, block 3 lot 1
(parts inaudible due to rustling papers and low voices)
Phil Bryson - its been sec--ded ah discussion, ah, ah. I would request that
ah, some consideration be given to a motion not allowing the clam
processing land but allowing the engine overhaul shop
Wayne Regelin - ah, I would feel ah, I would look very favorably on a, on an
application to ah, have a engine overhaul shop, once you have reached
an agreement with the city, ah, I believe we, would be remiss if we
would allow ah, leases to be modified, in the leases, the, the, current
ah, lease is not being ah, properly handled, but or even if we don't
think so, and apparently are you going to planning to negotiate with
the city on these leases
John Stoehner - yes, what happened on these on all this airport property
when the city hired an appraiser to come in he appraised all of this
property at fair market value and this is what our lease rate is based
on, not that they had a restricted use, for air ah, for aircraft tie
down. and as stated in my ah, my ah, plan there, right now aircraft
tie down is not a profitable business. 1 have 32 available tie down
spaces, I have as of this morning when I wrote this plan I had 16
tie down spaces leased, as of 5:00 this afternoon I only have 15 because
I lost one more customer, because he joined the Civil Air Patrol for
$12.00 a year he gets free tie downs. Or if they go to Kenai or over
to Soldotna and get paved, drive through tie down spaces for two hundred
-
J
u
r
l
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 12
Meeting of January 27, 1982
John Stoehner - (continued) a year. You know, ah tie down spaces ah, rental
is not a profitable business. And obviously, I'm going to have to do
something with this property to make it profitable and this is what I
hope you all take into consideration tonight.
Phil Bryson - further discussion on the motion. Jim
Jim Swalley - I don't have discussion on the motion, I would like to ah,
kind of explain, sort of the background on the situation, ah, both,
ah, in Mr. Stoehner's favor and against Mr. Stoehner. Number one in
past years, by however, whatever thinking of planning and zoning of
council at that time we do have other n?, businesses in that same
subdivision who are not aeronautical related, even though ah, reading
through the case histories and for lease applications that they
supposedly to be in, more aeronautical relat(' in one :sense or another,
ah, I'm referring primarily to soak: businesses along Wil.?aw Street.
Ah, getting back in specific to Mr. Stoehner's case the lot that he's
talking about is an isolated lot, meaning without the lot number block
1 lot 2 right in front of it, on this diagram it appears the Arctic
Aviation primarly lot (inaudible aue to rustling papers) block 1 lot
1 next to it is lot 2 which is by the lease and applied for many years
ago, ah, a tie down lot, or at lease below it is',the lot in question
and that lot by itself has no airport accesfi without going through
block 1 lot 2. They have no taxiway access (inaudible) So these two
lots have got to go together one way or another. Ah, what's happened
is that ah, we're all kind of victims of ah, many years ago, platting
and planning and so forth, and ah, what I'm trying to say is that this
lot without the lot facing the taxiway is not of aeronautical use.
However, we are restricted to maintain the airport in an aeronautical
mode, so ah, no what am I trying to say, we're tied in, locked into
a situation, the Stoehner's are locked into a situation this commission
the city council's locked into a situation for actions that were taken
many many years ago and it's going to take some kind of action or
whatever by starting with this body, and not just this one situation
we have others on the airport like this. But starting with this body
and then to council, we're going to have to remedy alot of these
particular situations that we got ourselves locked into, and when I
say we I mean the city and depending on how far back we want to go
but anyway the city itself is locked in, not just this one situation
!j but many of them, so its just likely something to think about to try
to avoid future problems, such as this.
Ben Delahay - Mr. Chairman
l
Phil Bryson - yes
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 13
^� Meeting of January 27, 1982
' Ben Delahay - if I may be heard, airport related purpose doesn't necessarily
mean you have to taxi an airplane into it, a project such as Mr.
Stoehner has suggested, a machine shop, you can drive up in a truck
and deliver a a parts or buy parts, these are airport related, ah,
and certainly if Mr. Stoehner brings himself into the good graces
of the city by living up to the terms of his other leases, ah, I can
see no reasons why his lease should not be ah, modified for any
airport related activity. The reason that the use given on that lease
was for airport parking and storage was because that's what Arctic
Aviation requested at the time they leased the property. Normally
the city doesn't have any problem modifying the lease as long as the
purposes fall within the those for which the land can be used. And
I'm sure that they wouldn't in this case, and if Mr. Stoehner's unable
ah, to use that land for other purposes, ah, and if it isn't paying
for the ah, use that he has it for, ah, so that he feels that it is
a loss to him and either the price he's paying now or what he might
_ be paying under renegotiation in '82, I would suggest he approach
the city manager for a cancellation, the city has cancelled other
airport leases where ah, people feel that ah, they're they're not
economically sound. And held them for someone who comes along who
does have an economic use for them. Certainly the city is not in a
position to demand that someone pay lease money more than land is
worth for the purpose the only purpose that they can use it for, but
if that is the only one they can use it for and it's not worth it to
them let them cancel it. If they do have another purpose that's
airport related, well then let them request a modification of the lease.
We have another lease not very far from there that brought up the
same argument a while back and, and ah, they had an attorney who
made a very extensive argument that for tie downs it wasn't worth it.
I belive that ah, there was, ultimately an agreement a settlement
of that matter and they're paying, ah, quite a bit more than ah,
Stoehner is now paying on lot 1 block 3.
Phil Bryson - I would, I would say if I ah, looking at the subdivision and
! ah, I would be more inclined to attached that lot 1 block 3 with lot
1 block 2 in not allowing any ah, if those are broken apart, I guess
they are right now in leases, but ah, there's no access, to the street
from lot 2.
John Stoehner - nor is there any taxiway access to lot I
Phil Bryson - thats right, yea
(voices covering each other and inaudible separately)
Phil Bryson - so I, you know, if more than anything else they should be combined
a
A
F
H
M
VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 14
Meeting of January 27, 1982
( Phil Bryson - (continued) rather than broken apart.
Ben Delahay - at least to the same party so at present time they are combined
Phil Bryson - yea, but its -a separate lease
Ben Delahay - separate leases
Phil Bryson - but that's another matter. Ah, further discussion?
Jim Blanning - I feel very comfortable with the engine overhaul shop and ah,
perhaps if these were separated out at a later date and brought back
that way, ah, I'd feel comfortable with the whole project but right
now it says clam processing and the engine overhaul, and I would
have a hard time with the clam processing under the circumstances so
the discussion
John Stoehner - Mr. Chairman. Ah, I'm not a gambler, per say, I don't own
a very good poker face to start off with, ah, one of the reasons why
we have put the clam processing in there is because 1 do know that its a
money maker. I can make money with it. A machine shop, that's a gamble.
But I've got one business in there that I know can carry it. The other
one, I'm willing to gamble on. But, to say to stand here and tell you
than I'm going to a machine shop in that airport and we're going to be
C able to do all this, (inaudible) and to stand here and tell you, yes,
everybody in the state of Alaska is going to send me their engines and
allow me to do their work, there's no way. I'm as big a gambler as the
man that has lot, ah lot number 4 up there with that air freight building
setting on it. He gambled, its been setting empty for over a year.
Why I don't know, maybe his lease is too, maybe his rental on the building
is too much he's asking too much. But, building is setting there and its
empty. I'm not the big of a gambler. Ah, at this point I will have to
say that if the clam processing is turned down then I will have to withdraw
my petition.
Phil Bryson - anything else. Question
Secretary - (called for roll call vote, motion failed unanimously)
t
JAY S. MAMMOND, 9M M00
4371 srHEFr
W COND FLOOR
C.
�r�,
DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERIATIO
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
(907) 2742..633
'
P.O. BOX 616
SOUIHCI-NTHAL H16101VAL OffICF
.1 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
(907) 486.7360
P 0 BOX 1207
2 SOLD07NA, ALASKA 9960
19071 762 5910
December 17. 1981
P.O. BOX 1'09
I VALDEZ", ALASKA 99686
19071 836 4698
P.O. BOX 1064
C WASILLA ALASKA 99687
Christine Stoehner 1907) 376.5038
dba Northern Lights Fisheries
P.O. Box 1406
Kenai, AK 99611
Dear Ms. Stoehner:
In response to your inquiry regarding discharge of wastewater from
your proposed razor clam processing facility to a municipal sewage
system, I offer the following comments:
Optimum water usage for a razor clam operation as you have operated
the past two years, and propose to operate in the future, falls
within a range of 500 to 700 gallons per hour at maximum demand.
The methods used in processing razor clams result in an insignificant
quantity of solids in the discharge, i.e., all viscera and solid
waste are retained for landfill disposal. 1 would recommend installation
of a baffeled trap system similar to a grease trap, located for
convenient daily cleanu-it. to further reduce any level of solids and
to collect any sand contained in the discharge.
The chlorine residual of 2 to 7 ppm, maintained in shellfish processing
water according to good manufacturing practice recommendations,
will cause a reduction in the microbiological load of the discharge.
It is my opinion that the wastewater discharged Lrom the average
restaurant or hotel would constitute a much heavier demand on a
municipal sewage treatment facility than your proposed razor clam
operation.
I suggest that any proposal you submit for review regarding wastewater
discharge to the City of Kenai sewage system include data regarding
the method of processing, together with actual percentages of shell,
meat and viscera weight per animal and daily volumes. This will clarify
the "insignificance" of the discharge, especially in light of the high
chlorine residuals maintained in processing wat r.
I hope I have answered your question to *aur s tisfac on.
*r.
;/
/�e far
S tari n
RWPs j lg =
Kenai
C.
c
C
M,
Register 69. April 1979 1 14VIRONMIXI'At. CONSERVATION 18 AAC 72.020
18 AAC 72.040
conventional sewerage system and a holding
tank is the best practicable method for
collection of wastewater: or
(2) in the case of replacement of a sewerage
system existing on the effective date of this
regulation. February 3, 1977, the lot size is too
small for an approved soil absorption system.
(m) No person may operate or maintain a
holding tank unless the holding tank is regularly
serviced pursuant to a contract with a pumper
permitted tinder sec. 50 of this chapter which
provides for disposal at a lawful site or facility
and for pumping of the holding tank at
sufficient intervals to prevent overflow of the
tank. (Eff. 8/10/73, Reg. 47; am 2/3/77, Reg.
61; am 8/16/78, Reg. 67)
Authority: AS 46.03.020(10)(A)
AS 46.03.02000)(D)
AS 46.03.050
AS 46.03.710
AS 46.03.720
18 AAC 72.023. MINIMUM TREATMENT. (a)
Secondary treatment is required for all publicly
owned treatment works which discharge to
natural surface waters of the state, unless a
modification of the secondary treatment
requirement is granted in accordance with sec.
301(h) of the Clean Water Act of 1977.
(b) The effluent levels from publicly owned
treatment works specified in (:i) of this section
can be modified whenever
(1) alternative percent removal levels for
biochemical oxygen demand and suspended
solids have been established on a case -by -case
basis for treatment works with combined
stormwater and sanitary waste (lows in
accordance with 40 CFR 133.103(a);
(2) the values for biochemical oxygen
demand or suspended solids are increased due to
the influence of an industrial facility connected
to the systems as specified in 40 C17I1
133.103(b): or
(3) in alternative level for the discharge of
suspended solids from a waste stabilization pond
is established in accordance with 40 CFR
133.103(c).
(c) Discharges of sewage not covered by (a) of
this section to the surface waters of the state are
required to have secondary treatment unless the
discharge is in compliance with sec. 312 (marine
sanitation devices) of the Clean Water Act of
1977.
(d) All other wastewater discharges to the
surface waters of the state must employ that
level of effluent reduction required by
applicable provisions of the Clean Water Act of
1977. (Eff. 2/2/79, Reg. 69)
Authority: AS 46.03.020(10)(A)
AS 46.03.070
AS 46.03.080
AS 46.03.710
18 AAC 72.024. IMPLEMENTATION AND
ENFORCEMENT PLAN. The plan for
implementing and enforcing sec. 23 of this
chapter must be based upon achieving the
minimum levels of treatment specified in that
section at the time of construction for new
discharges and as soon as possible but not later
than provided for in sec. 301 of the Clean Water
Act of 1977 for existing dischargers. (Eff.
2/2/79, Reg. 69)
Authority: AS 46.03.020(10)(A)
AS 46.03.060
AS 46.03.070
/ 18 AAC 72.030. PRETREATMENT. Tha
department may require that industrial liquid
waste or other waste which is discharged or
planned to be discharged to public sewerage
systems or treatment works be treated and
equalized in order to prevent overloading or
damaging effects upon the public sewerage
systems, treatment works. or receiving waters.
(Eff. 8/10/73, Reg, 47)
Authority: AS 46.03.020(10)(A)
AS 46.03.020(10)(1))
AS 46.03.020(10)(11)
AS 46.03.100(a)
AS 46.03.710
18 AAC 72.040. SLUDGE DISPOSAL. (a) No
person may deposit. cause the deposit, permit or
allow the deposit of sludge from septic tanks,
holding tanks. cesspools. privies, sewage
treatment works. water treatment works,
industrial or commercial facilities, or sludges
from other wastes to the waters or land without
a waste disposal permit.
18.18.5
COYLE - PROPERTY
Gov. Lot 2. Sec9, T5N, R11W
Schedule of Exhibits
I Location
II Platt Map Subdivision
III Present Values
IV Appraisal January 25, 1982 2 acres
IV -A Jaynes Subdivision Location Map
V Appraisal of Contingent
Property Done (6/19/78) ,
VI Letter Verifying viability of Industrial Subdivision
PROPERTY P.o. sox 156 $�
WORLD, INC. KENAI. ALASKA 99611
PHONE (907) 283-4688
JACKIE (SEWELL) RUSSELL HOMEPHONE
AnooNN BroW Y837379
744
?OR
,GOT S. T.
t r 01V I vS
Pf , �xN/fir .�' ✓�
/ N1 4u:'
• / x r i .of r• +•y J
rz
•� r
979,
O � it I � ,•
/�•' �.. •• } i ' •Cl�`Y ol+•kBalq/ aOAT i
• �/ •' � ; RAM•P r /�•O. W DEO/CATIaN � � �
I
I•...w... tM.X-Bo•ao ;
i
r i , • �1 ,I
• V
Map
• i kenai Peninsula
err% tt 6orovpitf Alaetca
IMOtt Nw M 1
.F}: Q•hl/M7717•••.A I•.,,,•f%wr .. .'. �,.r�t.ri.iiri
i - r
'j
I
0 1
I
I
j:
i
1
iA4
'. ,•..� 4
• MM
,��
• 6•H ••t / /
1 • •' i
W
s
Oft
Ip
u
``AA I
•
........ ....w...
....
,,... ....wlw+w%J .w':
.rww..Mr�1�fk�r•.�MMi�•.IWi
i
1�
:
.KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH
Box 850 Phone 262-4441
i
SOLDOTNA. ALASKA 99669
-
1
STAN rHOMPSON
r
September.5, 1973
MAYOR
Mr. & Mrs. Waldo Coyle
Box 466
_
'Kenai, Alaska 99611
• Us. - -.Kenai •andustrLai-nark subdivision
1
Dear f. & Airs. Coyle
,
Your subdivision plat is ready to go to the recorder's
office, providing all the other requirements have been
i
meta however, in the meantime, the Department of P,nviron-
mental Conservation regulations have come down. We re-
ceived our copy in this office August 17, 1973 and the
regulations were effective August 10, 1973.
Enclosed is a coov of the'reaulations and a copy of the
policy statement of the planning department.
r
It is your decision whether to abide by the State regula-
tions or to request this office to file your plat as it
now stands.
Please advise this office of your decision in writing.
,
Sincerely, -
i
i
�.
S. Best
1
Planning Director .
Enclosures
i
` r
r
F�
:9
M -
i
1�
sse 0• d b Q WIIUAM A. tGAN, GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF IIIGHWATS
CaraI 051W Slop TUXR Im —1. 0. IOX II6!
affion" On
October 3. IM
Yaldo and Ruby Coyle
Box 466
Kenai, Alaska 99611
left Project No. 8-0463 (10)
Kenai River Crossing
Subjs Access Road
Dear Waldo and Ruby,
As per our conversation October 2, 19732 at your house the
Highway Department will not build the road at plan station 104+88 heft.
You will still have access rights at this location as per your
Memorandum of Agreement with the Highway Department dated December 18,
19720 and your referenced Kenai Industr-ial Park Subdivision Preliminary
Plat. •
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely yours,
JACK M. SPAN, P.E.
Central District Engr.
Frank P. Narusch, P.E.
Project Engineer
FPN/MV
U
XOt 1 HOnleY Pasub. #5 4.32 Acres $42,000 / 12-80 No RI&I pi:Ont.
Gov. IA)t 105 East of Nath ya%ai Road Sec. 14 T6N, R12W. 1 Acre
Sold for.$26,000 2-79
9.3 Acres in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sac 34 27N 102W sold for $95,000 in 8-78
A Tudwr.Alaska Sub. 4.93 Acres Sold for $73,950 in 7-79
M .1/4 NE 1/4 Sec.' 34 T7N, M2W sold for $200, 000 in 9-78 No Access.
M 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec 34 T7N R12W POrtim East Of North Road 23.14 acres
Sold for $230,000 In 8-79.
," ' �-�•,.-r ram= ,r;,="-=
KIM , MIT S O tl�44
INC -ki jj,� 4 do,
$fit Ala •+� � .
•- -�• aoww�� wow - �• �, ..- • - - - ' i
t:
4 19 i too
• IM 0 4.91D Aa
a 9 f
• • ••
• �s , 14 TA , s IO&L
�"',�.. �. • � ' • •� rev• rA. L.
Vi
� � .'T: E'� 't . i' • � � /� i' � � .-� 1� aT • ...«r .yl '�!�•. /••dry 1,
o :.
Yi• , ••• . •,. .• /, .•
� : a • j • is LI K'�•;, '•'i•• •,� • ,,,4,,,., . •.. ._
u .L = A' r.. rN+�Y'• . W ► ". • �. ,11 ` �t . iIT
.2.
410b .T •T'•?f�• , i ' •1
•.vwwrri...•H.r
i
{
i
I
1
i !
f
t
f �
r'
V Iat 1 Henley Rssub. #5 4.32 acres $42,000 / 12-80 No Road Front.
I
�y Gay. Lot 105 East of North Mai Road Sec. 14 WN, R121q. 1 Acre
Sold for.$26,000 2-79
9.3 Acres in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec 34 T7N RIN sold for $95,000 in 8-78
Mc. A MxkSr . AL-lWQ Sub. 4.93 Acres Sold for $73, 950 in 7-79
NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec. 34 T7N, RIM sold for $200,000 in 9-78 No Access.
6 M 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec 34 T7N RIN portion East of North Road 23.14 acres
�7J sold for $230,000 in 8-79.
�
/
j
1
�
/
^
^ �
|
�
|
/�pPniral i, to tsurtyl"� giir tTi 1iiut a,it,ntn t'L� iil,o
ad toe FNMA, the appraiser must atisch it •tch or map showing location
,t,t ennrti,inns and lit exterior building &hose •ml••wrmrnIs shu.,.ry
dbaswemsnts l o. Slaies Sq. FL
#19" Is '40'9" , Main 1008
„ �, Basement 6 2
4' _, ' 24'9" , Garage w 396
5161, , 18 + 1♦ 19 , Cov. Deck . 298
eltment orLimitirg Con4rtiont IFNLMC Form 139/FNM orm WBI.
of Subject, lute s, distance from rN east ltiler,,�erc�rtion,,�,Q,,IIy
d.r..&..;:;,rs. Jt �•/�/ a ,/J
ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST — NEW — OF IMPROVEMENTS:
De1e,,,rp Main 1008 .,�, Ft p: 47,00 - :47,376
_Basement 612 ;t,, Ft. o s 16.00 -9,792
Extras Well 6 S_eptic 4,500
J
1f
41 , 8' • , Encl. Entry • 32
Sptxisl Energy Efficient IterM
Porches, Patios, Ste. Deck, Entry, She s •4,400
Gaage/dwj x 396 Sv. Ft. @ $ 15.00
j M ■ -
tat Gross Living Ares Vilat in Market Data Analysis betom 00
-
n Functional a economic lesance•
Site Improvements (driveway, landscaping, olej -
Total Estimated Cost New . . . S
Less Phy'kal Functional i tcoamic
Depreciation s11,500 �f i - s11.500
Depreciated value of improvements . . . . i
i
ESTIMATED LAND VALUE rvZtT-: y-, •
lit feasehotd, show only leasehold valid
j000,
INDICATED VALU 'COST-APPRO >Z a 00
i
i
i
undersigne0 has recited tfvtfolcsnd sties Ot properties most similar and proximate
•n includes a dollar adjustment. reF Ing market reaction to those items of significant
ris in the comparable property Is superior to, or more favorable than, the subject
1m: it a signifiant item in the eompaable is inferior to, or teas favorable than,
f value of the stsbjeaL
to subject and has considered these in the market analysis, The desaip-
variation between the subject and comparobte properties. If a significant
property, s minus 1.1 adjustment is made, thus reducing the indicted value of
the subject property, a plus 141 adjustment is made, thus imreasing the indica-
-
ITEM
Subject Properly
COMPARABLE NO. 1
COMPARABLE NO. 2
COMPARABLE NO.3
wren
000 Unnamed St.
Por Tr2,,jAYNES
000 19th Ave.
L6 8 RYAN SUB.
000 McCullum Rd.
Por.G
000 Walker Lane
„,,t,i t,
2 miles northeast
2 miles northeas
theast
es Prow
e s 68.000
s 76 00
; s 3OQ
u it or
: s 55.92
s 87.96
�s
Inspect/Client
Ins ect Client
Inspect/Client
to of Sale and
ntAdjustment
DE=RIPTION
DESCRIPTION Ad st
nt
DESCRIPTION Aej 11%rit
DESCRIPTION
Aej (lament
1-25-82
9-$l '
6-8
9-81
,roes
Ave _
Similar I
S
1
2ar,-Ind
3 - +
- I +
. and
nc
aco
Similar I
Similar
m a I
16 196
18 1961 + 1,005
8 1971 '- 4 900
95 + 2,500
Fair
Similar I
Superior - 1,500
imilar 1
WIg Ares Roan
tat and Total
-aLiv Arts
Total 18•ans 1 BatM
Total 1 8{rlss a Bath
6 2 - 2,4lFull
768 448 .Ft.
Total . B-rms 1 Baths I
2 t 1+ 600
864 ,Ft. + 3,600
Total a-rms I Bathst
t 1+ 600
804 720 Ft. - 2,100
5 3 1
1008 .Ft.
soment & B=L
i>i>�Ite Room
Prtl 612
6 Fi - S
Full 768 1
25 Fi -0 1
6 I
F 2- - - 5,500
rtl 720 f
5 %Fi I - Ban
'
" lv m
Avera a
Superior '- 1,500
Superior I- 1.500
u erior - 5
tomtits
None
Similar
Similar 1
Similar I
/car Poet
1G 8I 3 6 H
2G A 625 Uf - 00
2G A 6 2 I -
-1.5
F,tio.
s,ow.
Cvd Deck-298
_
Ent-128,lawn
Grnh-64 Porch ' + 700
CvdPorch-36,Sh�d
Deck-140 lawn + 900
toop,lawn ;
e 1 +
�seisl Energy
mt ham
I
/
1
'
_
%list `tc1heast
RO,FH
G/FA
RO,FH,DW ; - -000
G HW BB 1
2BI Fire
RO,FH,DWplaces� - 4,400
G'HW B8 '
O,FH,GD t
F t
ks o r Finsncfrlg
ssion,
1
AHFC-Conv.
1
VA
FC-Conv.
>< .lror
s.Rsoa .Loa
Plus Minus ;s 15,300
[;Fed
Plvs Mi., Is 600
Plus Minus' 18,100
's 83 300
's 6 0
's
onMaltesOsta See attachment
I
- tt� nnn
a
•
r �
' f
O
CAM
1 •
�.�Ti�T. "'� �if.v T�._T. �1t'�i�• a1 i�l�• _s.e,e•,J,..a� _-� � __,�.... _ . ...�_ - . —ems _ _ "'- _�. "-•-_���-_- _
• 3
SaC 3,4, 77SN,
MONA
OA—
eR
• 47
® �t ile
O O 000' •� �
0
..x.do
JAYNES SUB. K7�•3 �!�•
917-44 • 9 :o (�i� �® I
MOTS �j � {!f. i1/ N• re /
• bw
�lj IV
I
I
VVYEWULA IME-Ai i� S1�ATE i��I��i�' IIS� L
�, 1ni ,�i
ThrM-;+yr_,ut the Kenai Peninsula
Kenai Spur Road • Box 1413 • Soldotna; Alaska 99669 o 262-5822
opj�
June 199 1978 �v 10 1,10
Mr. John E. Wise, City Manager
Pi 0y of Box ' 4 a .
• 3
Kenai, Alaska 99611 j
RE: Short Narrative Appraisal of Tract B TY OF KENAI BOAT RAMP and
R.O.N. DEDICATION located a city limits of Kenai, Alaska.
Dear Mr. Wise:
As you requested May 9, 1978, 1 have made an inspection and valuation analysis
of the above property. The following short narrative appraisal contains the
most pertinent information and value conclusions concerning the property.
Emphasis is placed on the valuation with a minimum of detailed description.
This report is designed to assist you in your leasing or sale of city -owned
lands, and should be used in conjunction with existing city information and
materials. For uses beyond this scope, it is understood that a full narrative
report may be necessary.
SUMARY OF PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS
OSTENSIBLE OWNER
City of Kenai
LOCATION
The site is located 1h miles southeast of the Kenai city center between
the east bank of the Kenai River and the southwest corner of Ninth Avenue
S.E. and "K" Street S.E., within the city of Kenai.
PURPOSE AND FUNCTION
To estimate the current Fair market Value of the subject for leasing or
sales purposes.
DEFINITION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE •
11
For the purposes of this report, Fair Market Value is defined as "the
highest price estimated in terms of money which a property will bring if
exposed on the open market allowing a reasonable period of time to find a
Purchaser who buys with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted
and for which it is capable of being used."
TA&if I OF 9
SAL95 TABULATION
Grantor
Cate of
price,
Grantes
Sol#
Toffs
Univar Corp.
Chugisk
3/1/74
$7,600
1lhitney-Fidalgo
Alt Peninsula
cash
State of Alaska
Uganik Bay
10/77
2 200
16% do
Uganik Trdq Co.
Kodiak
10 yrs,
State of Alaska
Ninilchik Spit
3/9/17
21600
Osn Gorroute
Ninilchik
unknown
State of Alaska
Ninilchik Spit
3/9/77
61600
New 9ngtan9
Ninilchik
unknown
Fish Company
Oskolkoff
Ninilchik Rvr
:?/19/77
22,000
vanek
Ninilchik
unknown
Yunain
Boulder Pt
MV76
7 720
Schmidt
N. Kenai
26%
U.S. Gov't
Kenai Rvv
30,000.
MA
Kenai '' '
•
recomD.
con Frederickson
resat oir
f4''aI
!9aso
Rorer
1
Actual
Mse,
1mD.yalue
price
Lam.
Type ground
Use
AFeess
R�mtrkt
Land,
auil�.1."
Sow �
13,61 ac
$563.49/ac
level grass land,
water,
static mkt
unknown
Alaska y1
•0-
sppit, proposed
aircraft
remoto area
of Lands
flto cannery site
1.31 ac
1679.39/se
sbmrgd tidelands
air or
remote,
unknown
Alaska Of-,
10-
existing cannery
water
2 tracts
of Land:
site
,1185 ac
21,000/6c
ievel,sand,spit
water,
Slow mkt
$400
Appraiser•
5160 14,
46.54/sq'
exatnq cannery
road
-0-
self '
.0+ -
,3446 ac
15,760/se
level,sand,spit
water,
stow mkt
$1500
Apesriser.
15tollsq'
36.29/sq'
exstnq cannery
road
-0-
,elf
16636
33,160/ae
level grass small
water,
720s 'bldg
I'M
Multiple
28,908sqq'
se-12,000
,76AV bluff tidal
launch,
road
58-12,000
$4,000
Lstq Svc
$15-21,000/se
boat SPA
3.86
2,000/sc
level,bluff,gully
water,
adjacent
$9600
Seller
&0.
COSAq'
vac=racroational
trail
owne bought
-0-
.60
36,000)
8 333/8e
$,i9/sq'
level built-up
p,0,L.facility
road
rdrt of native tl/A 'Appraisal dor
6ottlement Act for natives a
14.0 ac
7,600/ac
level to river
pond
good gravel
to value of q'
$18,750 Appraiss'
00.
$.17/sq'
deck,cannery
water
gground b
16 ac
done for
frontago
possible
4,822
$22,500189
wetlands -vac.
water
foals
51/sq'
boat repair
.18/8490
$600.683/ac
f:7.79/sq'
M
I j
1) SALES FROM OTHER AREAS AND APPRAISALS
Six (6) sales and,two (2) appraisals were found,, the sales are from the
Alaska Peninsula .to North Keoai and vary in use from recreational to indus-
trial. They range in size from .35 to 13.61 acres and range in price from
$560 to $21,000/acre.
The smaller parcels of good uplands.in Ninilchik sold at from $15,750 to
$21,000/acre in the last year ± and set the upper range of value. The two (2)
remote sales are uplands or tidal lands in the southwest and set the low range
of value at from $560 to $1680/acre. After loosely-adjustinp5-10%/year for
time,.5-800X•for size and 40% for tidelands (discussed later, a closer range
of. value Is. -found -at- from $1,000 to $4,000/acre for uplands with no locational
adjustments.
The two (2) appraisals deal with upland properties in the subject neighborhood.
Comparable Ho.6 ($8,333/acre) is the March 28, 1974 appraisal done for the
Kenai,Native:Association on the 3.6 acre i'.O,L. site,located close to the Kenai
River. -Comparable No.7 .($7,500/acre) is the June 22, 2977 appraisal done for
Mr. Don Frederickson on the 14.0 acre site located on the east bank of the Kenai
•� River, south -of -the city of -.Kenai dock. ••After, loosely •adjust-ing -10%/year for time,
5-70% for size and 20% for non -river location, a, range of -value from $13,800-
$14,100/acre is found for upland'property-with good -access -and ground.
Generally, ground in Kenai is selling 2-3 times or 2.5 times more per acre than
ground in Ninilchik of equal sire and utility. When applied as a locational
adjustment to the Ninilchik sales, it indicates a price of $10,000/acre. The
remote sales were not adjusted for location because of lack of information.
The sales and appraisal information indicates a range of value from $10,000 to
$14,000/acre for uplands.
2) LEASES
• Land lease amounts are typically set, at a certain percent of market value per
Kear.- They represent a rent that the lessor is willing to accept as a return on
is land or investment and that the lessee is willing to pay for use of the
property but generally no interest in the property. The approach and basis of
thought is similar to method 04 which attempts•to separate income derived from
the rental. of improved properties between building and land. Leases can become
very complicated with provisions, restrictions, and leasehold interests, but
they will not be dealt with here because of the broad brush approach that is
being taken. ,
For purposes .of the report, the annual rental amount -is found, it is divided by
the existing or projected annual lease rate and the resultant figure is the -
estimated value of the property at the time of the lease. The lease information
is attached. The rates are those actually used or projected by the appraiser from
similar leases or lease rate trends in the area. Nine (9) leases or, prospective,
leases were found that range in size from 5.28 to 46-acres and range in price from
$714 to 26,100/acre.
rOYDtMOLAt ORAL ESTATE AVMAISAL
4.
VO
1.
J
U
Lease Comparables 1-4 are state leases of large parcels of tidelands along
Cook Inlet in North Kenai. The lease amounts were based on an 11/17/76 appraisal
and the lease rates of .076 were based on City of Kenai rates at the time of
appraisal. The state appraiser of the leases found no comparable tideland
sales to estimate value from as in this report. His approach was to follow the
method of "the Canadian Providence of British Columbia, which is deeply involved
in appraisal and leasing of various classifications of tidelands. They indicate
an upper limit of 50% of surrounding upland value in instances where foreshore
or intertidal areas are filled and utilized." The state appraiser has used 40%
because the North Kenai lease ground has both deep water submerged lands and
intertidal lands.
Lease Comparable 02 ($2,120/ac) was the key lot that all 4 parcels were valued
from. An upland value of $5,300/acre was arrived at -times 40% equaled a tidal
land value of $2,120/acre. ,
Lease Comparable -05 ($26,100/ac) is the lease of 11.5 acres of fully submerged
ground in Seward. The resultant price per acre Was so high that it was not used.
Lease Comparable 06 ($1,875/ac) is the 1970 -lease of 12.121 acres of wetlands
one mile southwest of the subject on the west side of the Kenai River. An access
road and small pad was built on -the -site at time of lease.
Lease Comparable 07 and 08 ($2d20 and $17,400/ac) are the 1974 and 1978 leases
of the developed City of Kenai dock and 11.5 acres of uplands. The first lease
was terminated because of lack of performance, and the second lease was recently
'written.
Lease Comparable 09 ($14,915/ac) involves the 1970 proposed lease of a raw 5.28
acre upland site located one mile north of the subject with 200 feet of frontage
on the Kenai River, good gravel soils and access. It was to be the City of Kenai
boat ramp but was never acted upon. After_ •a •10%/year time -adjustment, a 30% s.i ie
adjustment and a 30% location adjustment, the comparables indicate $4700/acre for
tidelands (North Kenai), $5,000/acre for partially developed wetlands, and
$26,000 to $27,000/acre for developed or good upland ground.
3) MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION
Mr. Don Frederickson, the owner of 321 acres of good gravel base ground south of
Salamatof Seafoods, north of Cherrier and King, west of the new Beaver Loop Road
and having 750f feet frontage on the Kenai River, was contacted as to the status
of his ground. He commented that several .people had shown an interest in buying
the ground along the Kenai River. He, however., wishes to lease only. One in-
dividual is presently negotiating for 1.25 acres of ground with 200 front feet on
the river and road access. The prospective lessee has been talking in the neigh-
borhood -of from $8-15,000 per acre as is. He feels that $15,.000/acre at an
annual lease rate of 8% is reasonable for the 1.25 acres of upland ground.
Adjusted for size, it indicates $10,000/acre for the upland ground.,
I
I S.'Yr.HOLM VEAL [STATE APPVAISAL
0
SUMMARY AND FINAL CORRELATION OF VALUE
Sales and Appraisal Information
Lease Information
Miscellaneous Information
U land Values
410-14,000/acre
$26-27,000/acre
$10,000/acre
11-7 r
betlands Tidelands
-0- -0-
$5,000/acre $4,100/acre
-0- -0-
•The upland values range in value from $10,000 to $27,000 per acre.
The lease information was based on a 1970 unexecuted lease of unimproved ground
and on a recent lease by Salamatof Seafoods that involved a developed site with
dock and access. The other indications of upland values are from $10,000 to
$14,000 per acre. Giving most weight to the sales ($10,000/ac) and the recent
negotiations with Mr. Frederickson ($10,000/ac), $10,000 per acre is indicated for
upland and when applied to the developed indication of $26,500 a figure of $16,500
per acre may represent an acceptable cost per acre to develop. In using the
reasoning of the State of Alaska and British Columbia where a direct relationship
exists between upland values and tidelands, a direct relationship must also exist
between upland values and wetlands. If *foreshore and intertidal lands have a
value that is 50% that of uplands and intertidal and submergible lands have a
value of 40% then wetlands that are above the intertidal flow and are not sub-
merged should have a higher percentage of upland values or 60%. Applied to the
upland value of $10,000/ac, it indicates $6,000/ac for wetlands. The tidelands
($4700/ac) when converted to wetlands using the above figures of-40 and 60%
indicate a value of $7,050 per acre.
The value indications are now $6,000/acre from upland values, $5,000/acre from
partially developed wetlands and $7,050/acre from submergible lands. Emphasis is
placed on the upper range of value. The single lease involving a partially
developed wetland which was within 8 years ago at an arbitrarily figured annual
lease is given little weight when used in conjunction with the other indications
of value. Equal emphasis is given to the two remaining acreage values for an
indicated value of $6,500/acre or
4.822 acres @ $6,500/acre = $31,343
rdd = $31,500.00
As a check against the above figure, a local broker and tax assessor were con-
tacted as to their "feeling" for the value of the property. They indicated a
range of from $9,000 to $12,000/acre which is considered to be optimistic
because of the above information.
If you have any questions about this appraisal, please contact me.
Resp ctfull 'Su itt d,
FRY dOLM TAT 'APPRAISAL
G= l�
:crno L./Frykh lm/ Jr.
Appraise
t Lit 1 ! I.a1 &I -AL [fTAT1` AgWVA1fAL
a
9- i
.. .,
.41
1
State 01 A•aik.t
Arnoss 'er••a'
••
•••,
lj•�jr5ec
2/3 rb»rod •
industrial, dock
water
;
2
State of Alaska
•��•;•
:.,.
•'7b
$83,000
38.lblae,
S2120/sc
1/S intertidal
4/6 sbmrgd,indstrl
Road,
water
158•JO?
419 fendtrs
•e•a�
•;''+
dock,barge loading
3
State of Alaska
!north
a;ae
• '
.016
$86,815
46.482ac
S1910/sc
1/6 intertidal
6/6 sbmrgd
Road,
water
$15,600 j
(76.61)
Union Oil
Wit;)/76
industrial, dock
4
State of Alaska
North
Road
i:.'."�
076
$60,626
$1900/ac
1/6 intertidal
6/6 sbmrgd
Road,
water
S15,6OO
(76.618c)
Union Oil
Kenai
;:/:1/76
31.642ae
industrial .wharf
S
City of Seward
Seward Dock
fit.^.00
f300,000
11.5ac
526,300/ac
sbmrgd
industria ,dock
indu100% trial,
Road,
water
.0. ,
crosser Ind,
Seward
9/21/71
other teases
other le
brelated uses
;
f
•
6
City of Kenai
Kenai
R.
5:818.19
none- 08
$22,700
$1875/Ac
Mal a wet lands
cannery
goaLed#
$16,000
R-Let Seafoods
Kenai
5/6/70
other losses
12.1218c
Road,
8,250
$10-
7
City of Kenai
v,,- a
R.
$1963.20
none-.08
$23,240
11.5
S2020/ac
tidal,wetbuplands
dock
water
"0•
Industrial Oil
Kenai
4/74
other leases
517.400/ae
tidal,wet6upt8nds
Road,
$16,250
8
City of Kenai
%ertf
A.
512,000
none-.OB
leases
$200,000
11.5
dock
water
•0-
Salamstof Sfds
Kenai
3/15/78
other
$78,750
$14,919/8e
aboat
Miter
$18,760
9
Pon Freeman
Kenai
Kenai
R.
$6300
10/l/70
none-.08
other leases
S.28ac
19711city
launching raap-
16ae
City of Kenai
propose0 1
• I
C
ON
:NAI PENINSULA BOROUGH
BOX 850 • SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 09660
PHONK 262.4441
February 17, 1982
Mrs. Ruby Coyle
Box 466
Kenai, Alaska 99611
RE: Kenai Industrial Park Subdivision
STANTHOMPSON
MAYOR
Dear Mrs. Coyle:
This letter is intended to confirm our conversation on this
date.
The preliminary plat of Kenai Industrial Park Subdivision was
granted conditional approval by the Kenai Peninsula Borough
Planning & Zoning Commission on December 7, 1970. This app-
roval was granted under Kenai Peninsula Borough Ordinance
No. 26. The conditions of the preliminary approval were mod-
ified by special consideration of the Commission on February 8,
1971.
Although the preliminary approval remains valid, a time ex-
tension request must be received and granted by the Borough
Planning Commission prior to further action on the plat. You
have the option of requesting final approval under Kenai Pen-
insula Borough Ordinance No. 26 or in accordance with the pre-
sent platting regulations. (Ordinance 78-37/Substitute). In
either case, final approval must be granted by the Borough
Planning Commission prior to filing the plat.
I have provided file information regarding Kenai Industrial.
Park Subdivision for your reference.
44 Sincerely, ,
)Sn
F AHN
ior Planner
(, JL s rl
encl:
0
/;1W
PROPERTY
WORLD, INC.
February 17, 1982
Mayor Vince O'Rielly
Kenai City Council
P 0. BOX 158 �� !/
KENAI. ALASKA 99611
PHONE (907) 283.4888
Res Intent to Sell - Portion Gov. Lot 2,
Sec 9, TSN, R11W, S.M.
This is to inform you that Property World, Inc. has been employed
by Ruby -&,Waldo Coyle, to market the above -described property— in-
cluded in the Listing'is a request -that the City of -Kenai be given
a 30-day Right of First Refusal.
This hand carried letter is our officalsnotification that -the 30
days begin as of our 10s30 AM. -appointment -with you on the Date, .
February 17, 1982.
We have requested time for a presentation to the City Council
Meeting tonight, February 17, 1982 and the adgenda has been amended
to reflect this.
Attached documentation reflects the source of information which
influenced the Coyles•setting the price @-.$15,000 per acre.
Your signature below will certify receipt of-this.notice and the =
beginning of -the Thirty (30) day period of Right of First Refusal.
Received By;
y yor, City of Kenai
Dates
Time:
We request the return of the original and will leave a certified
copy with you for your office files.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
,sincerely,
,Jac ie Russell,
I.Associate Broker
Listing Agent
cc; City Manager, Bill Brighton
■
l
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 755-82
SUBSTITUTE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, TO
AMEND KMC 1.15.040 TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION AND
ADDING ITEMS TO THE AGENDA AT COUNCIL MEETINGS.
WHEREAS, KMC 1.15.040.provides that the agenda for each meeting
of the City Council shall be prepared by the City Clerk after
consultation with the Mayor, and further provides that no items
shall be added to the agenda except by unanimous consent by the
Councilmen present, and
WHEREAS, it would appear unreasonable that an agenda set by the
City Clerk and the Mayor could not be modified except by
unanimous consent of the Councilmen present, and
WHEREAS, since any member of the Council can request the Clerk to
place an item on the agenda, since the Mayor is not always
present for c-onsultation when the agenda is put together, and
since the City Manager has administrative responsibilities for
the City and should be more aware than the Mayor of pending
matters which should be brought before the Council, it would
appear to be more appropriate to require consultation between the
City Clerk and the City Manager before preparation of the agenda.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, as follows:
Section 1: That KMC 1.15.040 is hereby amended as follows:
"1.15.040 aggn&: The agenda for each meeting of
the City Council shall be prepared by the City Clerk
after consultation with the City t4anag" [MAYOR]. Such
agenda shall be distributed by the City Clerk to each
member of the Council at least 24 hours prior to the
meeting, and no further items shall be added to the
agenda except by majality vote [UNANIMOUS CONSENT] of
the Councilmen present at a meeting."
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day
of February, 1982.
ATTEST:
Janet -i7helan, City Clerk
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR
First Reading: February 5, 1982
Second Reading: February 17, 1982
Effective Date: 14arch 17, 1982
M
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 755-82
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, TO
AMEND KMC 1.15.040 TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDING ITEMS TO THE
AGENDA AT COUNCIL MEETINGS.
WHEREAS, KMC 1.15.040 provides that the agenda for each meeting
of the City Council shall be prepared by the City Clerk after
consultation with the Mayor, and further provides that no items
shall be added to the agenda except by unanimous consent by the
Councilmen present, and
WHEREAS, it would appear unreasonable that an agenda set by the
City Clerk and the Mayor could not be modified except by
unanimous consent of the Councilmen present.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, as follows:
Section 1: That KMC 1.15.040 is hereby amended as follows:
"1.15.040 Auk: The agenda for each meeting of
the City Council shall be prepared by the City Clerk
after consultation with the Mayor. Such agenda shall
be distributed by the City Clerk to each member of the
Council at least 24 hours prior to the meeting, and no
further items shall be added to the agenda except by
majority vote IUNANINOUS CONSENT] of the Councilmen
present at a meeting."
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day
of February, 1982.
ATTEST:
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR
First Reading: February 5, 1982
Second Reading: February 17, 1982
Effective Date: March 17, 1982
C-- 'Z
/ CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 756-82
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82
GENERAL FUND BUDGET By $18,300 FOR MORE OVERTIME FOR TIIE FIRE
DEPARTMENT.
WHEREAS, the Fire Department was appropriated $42,500 for
overtime for FY 81-82, and
WHEREAS, through the first six months of the year, overtime costs
have amount6d to $27,403, and if this trend continues, this
account will be overspent by approximately $15,000, and
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief anticipates that, based upon call -out
procedures in effect, this trend will continue.
WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all
appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues
and appropriations be mades
Increase Estimated Revenues:
Appropriation of Fund Balance
Increase Appropriations:
Fire -Overtime $15,000
Fire -FICA 11000
Fire-PERS 1,500
Fire -Work. Comp. Insurance $.QQ
AM
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day
of February, 1982.
VINCENTwO'REILLY,-MAYOR
ATTEST:
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
First Reading: February 5, 1982
Second Reading: February 17, 1982
Effective Date: February 17, 1982
Approved by Finance: -a,W
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 82-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
TRANSFERRING $2,000 IN THE 1981-8,'. GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO -PROVIDE
MONIES FOR THE CITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ALASKA-1984.
WHEREAS, the City is applying for a $2,000 grant from Alaska-1984
for participation and planning involved with Alaska's Silver
Anniversary, and
WHEREAS, it is not yet known when and if such a grant will be
approved by Alaska-1984, and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to begin the planning process as soon as
possible, and therefore desires to use City monies to begin the
process with the belief that such monies will be reimbursed by
the forthcoming grant from Alaska-1984.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the City of
Kenai, Alaska, that the following transfer of monies be made in
the 1981-82 General Fund Budgets
Froms
Other -Contingency j140.1291
J
'
TO:
Other -Salaries $ 895
Other -Work. Comp. Insurance 5
Other -Operating Supplies 200
Other -Communications 70
Other -Printing & Binding 230
Other -Transportation 500
Other-14iscellaneous _lQQ
626=Q
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day
of February, 1982.
ATTEST:
Janet 4Jbelan,_City Clerk
Approved by Finance: -9.!&e
J
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR
Wi
1
C-q
1
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 82-22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THAT
THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE AIRPORT TERMINAL
RENOVATION AND EXPANSION CAPITAL PROJECT FUND:
From:
Contingency (555,388)
TO: !'
Engineering/Inspection $55,388
This transfer provides monies for additional services provided by
the architect on this project per the amendment to the Carmen
Vincent Gintoli contract dated January 7, 1982.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day -
of February, 1982.
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR.
J
ATTEST:
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
Approved by Finance:
a
January 26, 1982
MEMORANDU24
�e
CITY OF KENAI
,.ad eat oi 41,a44d„
►. O. SOX 550 KENAI, ALASKA 99*11' ,
—' TE/EiNONE 265 • 1536
TO: Wir.. J. Brighton, City Manager
FROM: C. A. Brown, Finance Director CO
SUBJECT: Water and Sewer Rates
For distribution at 2-5-82 Council meeting with revised
proposed water and sewer rates.
I have revised the water and sewer rates that were presented
to Council on 1-20-82. This has been done as a result of
comments made by Council and CH2M Hill, as well as the discussion
I had with you last Friday.
CH2.% Hill's main concern was that we were not raising the rates
high enough, and that if we increased them slightly more than
at first presented, then we could hold the rates steady for
at least a year. I believe this was also one of Council's
concerns.
What I have done is to increase the rates as presented on
1-20-82 by 10%. A brief analysis of the revenue and expense
projections for FY82-83 based upon these rates follows:
WATER SEWER
Revenues (see attached) $147,107 $330,080
Expenses:
Per 1981-82 Budget $122,601* $228,199
x 1.1 (101 increase) x 1.1 x 1.1
1 4, 61 $251,019
Additional Utility Costs 0 25,000
Repayment to General Fund 0_ 52,433
$134,861 $328,452
Not (Revenues over Expenses) 12,246
*Excludes Contingency
f
The 1.1 multiplier of 1981-82 budgeted expenses is an attempt
to estimate 1982-83 expenses. 1982-83 estimated expenses do
not include any costs of new personnel, per your direction
to me. Note that the cost of repayment of the "loan" to
General Fund is included.
Based upon these rates, a comparison of residential costs
follows:
OLD RATE
NEW RATE
Residential
Water,
Single Family
$12.00
$ 7.70
Residential
Water,
Apartment
9.00
5.80
Residential
Sewer,
Single Family
10.55
18.00
Residential
Sewer,
Apartment
7.90
13.50
CAB/dc
Attachment
Rq rPr
M oh 7A �HMNQ/
Rg7'0- Rlv.nNG
1 '
riwg/C `9w.:/y
63Y
%%O
ssis�2
1 3
ONE/o•xti
3
7 70
AIS 7 '
`
At It =
sob
Silo
3s�/fl F
i
/3oard,wf Ho"it.,
t
3 PSI
43 /
1
1
tO
,t
'teft, !tiff T,rerhv �i.��,r: >c t c,�i�
So 0
70
y t o 0
is
Th✓craJ� 6�r� lho ,t: tt �c.)
�.�o,
%S-
l '7So. t:
u
C�iwrcl. Lod�ev, C/«Ar
�YSo, '
.. .0k
Y3Z,
`„Z /
7e is
.o;
iYY
1t1
Office Q/afrl��/S'glo7
='
J4plrA.lrrleIf
t
.IX20
/'t /J ti
t9
a4✓r'ftslr�r �Q4gy'v J�iCP. /1tiv/r
__ ('!ft)
sso
l I Mr..
19C[Yl�<i
t�4 i L
::
Jt/F—IYJ G4bAdrly,
_ 3
ft�'t
.3 /tr6 .-
t0i.
?s
�oc7"o.�p.Qnfa�.f
6
!/70 33_
ti
Oftilr MMM.ti�C/ vidff
13
�7f
Yt9
28
Al
19
It
l
ii
1t
75
35
�D
1D
43
y_
c ..• •• ...�• c ...•. �assos owi � •. .•t w�►� •a•
- • ... -
.�•rr w v s..
tar
PPP
�•
f
;
V
aqr�
Rev.nNG
r-.9 /r
6o`j
/$o.
13 / Syy
1
0•,l/exe,
3o
400
400 i
'
Ap
yb'o
/ 3So
77760
6
60Q"dr.tf Alowie.,
f
90o
Syo ..
1
6 Yl t
to
t t
reIfImO re/!
/ b 6:
l/ 6f
23207 t t
u
,cr.,A, lifer, -r-wernI
9 900
t1
.ra ✓er.t/� //9 rJ �� o ,f'i r� 4 a..)
SO.
: / St0
115 0 :l
�•
ti
'1n�D0►' 7AQg�ei
.. .boo, ..
.oS
3 6 o 15 '
�11
Office Q/�fl
90.
zr/S'
716 x ,
'i
.f+rptrw.9rrlrf
2
jrvVO
3 60c^ t:
t9
ag
21
Co,r,Mlrc.a/. G9a�drr
.IS/.60
363r
n
Je/f —Svf Geiy,drrr
30
;t14S--.
_ 76YO
13
klePecs�:D., )"q�c:1�t�,
-,r
24
1��'r:ce-rtal•0�!
, s
�27r..
�36s
Do4t _o t r'
o �xs
16
otytr Mw».sr�c/ (l/ds!
l 3
6 bf
/037 =`
26
6
19
0 O ft'o
331
c
}"
17
i
33
1+
t
f15
--
-- --
--
36
J 37
i
•I
19
i
i
t r•.v a ,o+r•ao�•�w WOf Wte •. sue, •.•ra ro. -
- -
rr�t •� u • w
M'
CITY OF KENAI
PUBLIC UTILITY
REGULATIONS AND RATES
A. Regulations
The following regulations of the City of Kenai, pertaining to the
water and sewer system, have been issued under the authority of Title
17 of the Kenai City Code of Ordinances. Regulations issued prior to
this date are superseded by the regulations that follow:
1. Application for Service: It shall be the responsibility of the
customer to apply for ut1lity service or discontinuance of service by
signing a service order at the City Administration Building, Kenai,
Alaska.
2. Water and Sewer Connections and Extensions:
a. The property owner or his contractor may apply for a water
and sewer permit for a connection and/or extension of service
lines. The entire cost of water or sewer service connection
and extension will be borne by the property owner.
b. At the time the new service is provided, all connections to
existing private systems, wells, septic tanks, cesspools, etc.,
shall be physically disconnected from the City system and their
use discontinued.
C. All water turn-ons and turn-offs and the operations of the
keybox at the property line shall be made by City personnel only.
A fee of $10 will be levied on requests for turn -on and turn-off
(after initial turn -on) during normal duty hours. A fee of $20
will be levied on requests for turn -on during periods other than
normal duty hours, and whenever such action is required due to
delinquent account.
d. All customers shall be required to provide a separate stop
and waste valve, if it does not exist, inside a building being
served. The valve shall be located on the service entering the
1
t
i
building ahead of any branch lines where it is readily accessible
in the event of emergency.
e. Each and every building served by the water utility shall
have a separate outside shut-off. In the event it is impossible
to get a separate outside shut-off within the public right-of-way,
the property owner shall provide the shut-off within private property
and execute, in favor of the City, an easement providing access
for the City personnel to the keybox.
f. The property owner shall be responsible for notifying the
City, and shall sign a disconnect request if a service is to be
abandoned.
3. Deposits for Service: For domestic and commercial customers, a
deposit is required of $20 for.water service and $20 for sewer uervice.
These deposits may be refunded upon request after two years of timely
payment history.
4. ydrants: The use of fire hydrants is prohibited except for
special situations when approval, in writing, has been obtained from
the Fire Department, and upon payment of the use charge. A deposit
of $50 is required to assure careful use of the hydrant and will be
refunded if no maintenance is required when hydrant use is completed.
(There is also a cost for water usage.)
5. Common Connections: There shall be no common connections for
use by several properties or families. No connection will be permitted
across property lines unless assessments or lump sum payment has been
paid.
6. Location of Keybox: It shall be the property owner's responsibility
to know the location of, and have marked, the keybox and thaw wire
on the water service connection. The standard keybox marker shall be
a 4" X 4" wood post, 4 feet in height, painted white with black top and
the word "water" stenciled in black letters no smaller than 2" high.
Property owners who do not use the standard marker should have some
other method of locating their keyboxes or be prepared to stand the
cost of location in time of necessity.
7. Sewer Service Clean -out: No person shall install a sewer extension
to a building without placing in the line near the building and at
every change of direction of the sewer line, a sewer line clean -out of
4" minimum diameter. The property owner shall mark or be familiar with
the location of such clean -outs.
2
8. Rental Properties: In the case of a delinquent water and sewer
bill, the property owner shall be held responsible.
B. Rates
The charges to users of water and sewer systems
within
the City of
Kenai are as follows:
1. SCHEDULE A - GENERAL DOMESTIC SERVICES
RATES
(NON -METERED)
Per Month
Water
Sewer
One or two-family residence,
per family unit
$ 7.70
$ 18.00
Single or double unit apartment,
per family unit
$ 7.70
$ 18.00
Apartment, three or more units
under one roof, per family unit -
Single bill assumed by owner.
$ 5.80
$ 13.50
Separate billing.
$ 7.70
$ 18.00
Trailers, one or two on single
lot or court (each)
$ 7.70
$ 18.00
h
Trailers, three or more on lot
or court, per trailer unit -
single billing
$ 5.80
$ 13.50
:.z
Separate billing
$ 7.70
$ 18.00
Boarding houses, per available room
$ 3.85
$ 9.00
MINIMH CHARGE: One month's service
{s
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The above schedule is
restricted to
service used
` }
exclusive) for general domestic y g purposes,
as distinguished from
commercial or other uses of water or sewer
service.
i
;1
3
'
f>
S
1
F
Per
Month
Water
Sewer
Doctors' and Dentists' offices,
per room or chair
(Psychiatrists & Optometrists,
apply office rate)
$
4.70
$
10.90
Garages, service stations
$
9.50
$
22.75
Hanger, airplane repair
$
9.50
$
22.75
with washing facilities
$
11.00
$
25.00
Hospitals, per bed
$
6.25
$
15.00
Hotels, motels, resorts, per room
$
4.85
$
11.65
Dormitories (Establishment providing
sleeping quarters), per bed
$
2.10
$
5.00
Laundry, self-service, per machine
$
8.85
$21.25
Markets, meat
$
12.10
$27.50
Office buildings where single bill
is assumed by owner, per business
$10.45
$25.15
Office, in multiple office building
.
where individual tenants are billed,
per business
$12.10
$27.50
Restaurants, cafes, lunch counters,
„
1
fountains, taverns and bars (with
kitchens)
For each seat (Note 2)
$
.70
$
1.65
Public office building, per restroom
$
2.75
$
6.65
<Y 11i
(r i.
Recreation facility. per restroom,
sauna or shower, etc.
$
5.25
$12.60
j
Schools, per seating capacity
$
.31
$
.75
5
I
it
3
Per Month
Water Sewer
Shopping centers (depends on stores
included in shopping center, Note 1)
Shops, beauty, per station or chair $ 5.50 $ 12.85
Shops, miscellaneous (including barber
shops), per shop $ 5.50 $ 12.85
Sleeping room, per room (without
facilities for housekeeping) $ 2.10 $ 5.00
Studios, photo or photo lab $ 25.85 $ 60.00
Super markets, (grocery stores)
(Note 1) $ 62.20 $150.00
Theaters:
Indoor, per seat $ .02 $ .05
Outdoor, per stall $ .04 $ .10
Taverns, lounges, bars (without
kitchens), per seat $ .65 $ 1.50
X-Ray or laboratory office $ 15.40 $ 35.85
Note 1: Additional for other
facilities such as restaurant,
beverage dispensary, etc., are at
the applicable use charge for each
such facility.
Note 2: When a restaurant serves liquor
and 1tas no separate bar, no additional
charge for a bar will be applied. 11owever,
when a restaurant has a separate bar, the
bar stools will be charged at the given rate.
MII:f M CHARGE: One month's service.
6
r
0
Special Condition: Where more than one customer is served from
the same service line between the City's water main and the
customer's premises, the City reserves the exclusive right to
determine how the demand charge under this rate schedule shall
be applied and apportioned between said customers.
Cesspool Pumper Charge: Charged per KHC 17.30.040 (5).
3. SCHEDULE C - INDUSTRIAL SERVICE (NON -METERED)
Per month
Water
Concrete mixing plant $100.00
Concrete products $ 50.00
Confectioner $ 33.35
Greenhouse, co.imercial $ 33.35
Ice cream plant $ 50.00
Cold storage plant or lockers $ 23.35
Demand Charge: In addition to the above, the following shall be added
where the water connection is larger that 3/4 inch:
1" service $ 8.0
1 1/4" service $ 12.00
1 1/2" service $ 20.00
;. 2" L larger service must be metered
Minimum Charge: One month's service.
Sewer Charges: Honthly sewer charges shall be 233% of monthly water
charges.
4. SCIEDULE D - Fiia PROTECTION SERVICE.
Fire Protection Service: For autom:aic sprinkler systems:
NO CILIRGE
L•
7
Special Conditions
(a) Water service under this schedule shall be available, at
the option of the City, to "dry type" automatic sprinkler systems
for sire protection• only.
(b) All fire protection lines, sprinklers, pipes, and valves
on private property shall be owned, installed, and maintained
by the owner and/or customer.
(c) All connections between the City's main and privately owned
facilities will be made at the expense of the customer.
(d) At the option of the City, sprinkler service may be metered.
The meter and the installation thereof shall be at the expense
of the customer.
(e) No tap or outlet for use other than fire protection shall
be permitted on fire lines or mains, unless approved by the City.
(f) In times of emergency, the right is reserved by the City to
turn off any fire hydrant and/or sprinkler system at the
discretion of the City Fire Chief or other authorized person.
(g) No drains from fire sprinkler systems shall be directly
connected with the City Sanitary Sewers, and no cross -connection
whatsoever will be permitted between fire protection facilities
connected to the City's system and possible sources of contaminated
water.
5. SCHEDULE E - METERED WATER SERVICE
Per Month Per Thousand Gallons of Water
First 30.000 gallons $ .85
Next 170,000 gallons .60
Next 250,000 gallons .50
Next 550,000 gallons .30
Over 1,000,000 gallons .20
Minimum Charge Per Month: Under size of meter.
8
Water Allowances for
Meter Size Minimum Charge Charge
1" 10,000 gallons $ 8.50
1 1/2" 25,000 gallons 21.25
2" 60,000 gallons 43.50
Over 2" - By special contract.
The City reserves the right to determine the size, type, and manufactor
of the meter to be installed. Meter and remote reading device shall
be purchased and installed by owner and inspected by the City. Meter
repair as necessary shall be made by the City with costs billed to
the owner.
Sewer Charges: Monthly sewer charges shall be 233% of water charges. _
SCHEDULE F - TEMPORARY MISCELLANEOUS WATER SERVICE (Repealed)
SCHEDULE G - WATER SERVICE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
One Time Service Charge
$10 T:
For ground floor area of 2,000 sq. ft. or less $ 10.00 _
For each additional 1,000 sq. ft. (or portion thereof) $ 5.00
Fire hydrant use may be permitted by the Fire Department, and
upon payment to the City of an additional charge of not less than:
Per use day $ 13.35
Per week $ 66.70
i
SCHEDULE H - PERMIT FEES
I
a. Water - $ 50.00
i
b. Sewer - $ 50.00
C. The permit fees set herein are to reimburse the City for the
cost of inspecting connections.
i
9
r
i
-
I
Adopted by City Manager on
February 8, 1982 to become effective on
:,=..
March 1, 1982.
sf
I
William J. Brighton
City Manager
Approved by City Council on
Janet Whelan
City Clerk
'i
g
r
10
t
: l
•
I
ZI
- J�
{
�El
O
DEPARTME
ALCOHOLIC
11 S N /
a IA►' S. HANWNA 60YEANOQ
1T 41F I&D;V1;-N1!R
201 EAST 97H. AVENUE
BEVER40ECONTROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 09501
February 10, 1982
Janet Whelan, Clerk
City of Kenai
P.O. Box 580 `f=
Kenai, AK 99611
Dear Ms. Whelan:
tie are in receipt of the following application(s) for transfer of aliquor
license(s) within the Cit of Kenai You are being
notified as required by AS 04.11.5ZO.
BEVERAGE DISPENSARY (HOTELMOTEL)
SA61 PAN RESTAURANT & LOUNGE; Katmai Motel, Inc.; Pres. Athanasios
Dimitrios Maheras; Sct. Konstantinos-Macheras; Kenai Spur Rd. and
_ Beaver Loop; Mail: P. 0. Box 2840, Kenai, AK 99611. Transferred
from Athanasios 0. 14aheras and Katmai hotel, Inc.; Pres. Brian Peck;
VP Althea Peck; Set/Tress. Nancy Peck; same d/b/a and location.
You may protest the approval of the application pursuant to AS O4.11.480
! by furnishing the board and the applicant with a clear and concise
- written statement of reasons in support of a protest of the application
r within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If you file a protest, the board
-2-
will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbi-
trary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with
AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is
denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to
an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not
satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in
accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING,
YOU MUST COME FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT
OF YOUR PROTEST.
Under AS 04.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for
premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits
the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the
regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) munici-
palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro-
hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages.
If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the
prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of
service upon the applicant.
If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or con-
sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises, and no variance
of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and
provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance, if you
have not previously done so.
PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER
AS 04.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that
in mind in responding to this notice.
Sincerely,
,l /1
Betty L. Calhoon
Records & Licensing Supervisor
(907) 277-8638
BLC:vk
Enc.
AGENDA
KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
-'
FEBRUARY 5, 1982 - 700PM
PLEDGE OF ALLECIANCE
... .--
A.
ROLL CALL
1. Agenda Approval
B.
PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
1. Atty. Ted Carson and Mike Baxter - Protest to
Letter of Objection to ABC on Renewal of
Liquor License - Rainbow Bar
C.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Resolution 82-18 - Transfer of Funds - Seven
Employees Attend Dale Carnegie Course - $4,550
2. Resolution 82-19 - Transfer of Funds - Additional
Electric Costs in Sewer Service Dept. - $1,500
3. Resolution 82-20 - Awarding Contract for Senior
Citizen Center Design t Coast. - C. Gintoli
4. Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - City
Participation in Alaska-1984
a. Approval of Grant Application
D.
MINUTES
1. Regular Meeting, Jan. 20, 1982
a. Verbatim, Jan. 20, 1982
• l
E.
CORRESPONDENCE
P.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Carmen Gintoli - Airport Schematics
2. Carmen Gintoli - Library Schematics
3. Water & Sewer Rates
G.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000
3. Ordinance 755-82 - Amending Kenai Municipal
Code to Modify Requirements for Adding Items
to Agenda at Council Meetings
4. Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns -
Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300
5. Lease Application - Terminal Building -
"
Sea Airmotive
6. Agreement Between Bob Roper and City of Kenai
7. Games of Chance a Skill - American Lesion •20
8. Games of Chance & Skill - Eegles 43525
H.
REPORTS
1. City Manager
2. City Attorney
3. Mayor
4. City Clerk
5. Finance Director
6. Planning & Zoning
7. Harbor Commission
J
I.
PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED :O BE HEARD
ADJOURNMENT
+�wasa+s�r-lntaxzisl
a ,
- - -7
- --- -- -rev- • .-.._..rzss��
F�
s
3
KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES
FEBRUARY 5, 1982, 7sO0 PM
KENAT_ CITY ADMIYISTRAT7ON BUILDING
ACTING MAYOR RON MALSTON PRESIDING
PLEDGE OF ALLECIANCE
A. ROLL CALL
Presents Ray Measles, Dick Mueller, Tom Wagoner,
John WI -se, Ron Malaton
Absents Vincent O'Reilly (excused), Betty Glick
excused)
MOTION:
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Wise, that Council cast a unanimous ballot appointing
Councilman Malston as President Pro Tempore
in the absence of the Mayor and Vice Mayor.
Motion passed by unanimous consent.
A-1 Agenda Approval
Agenda was approved as submitted.
8. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
8-1 Atty. Ted Carson and Mike Baxter - Protest to Letter
of Objection to ABC on Renewal of Liquor License -
Rainbow Bar
Atty. Carson spoke. He was representing Mike Baxter,
owner of the Rainbow Bar. The City has protested
renewal of his Liquor license. The taxes not paid
are not from the current year, Mr. Baxter is current
for this year. The City has protested on information
from the Borough. He feels this information is not
accurate.
Mike Baxter spoke. He asked Council to withdraw the
protest or at least hold off, the letter he received
from the Borough dated Jan. 20, 1982 said he was in
arrears on the note that he signed last summos. Also
it said that he was delinquent in the 4th quarter.
He had till the end of January to make the 4th quarter
payment. He promised two times a month payments, he
made several and could not make more. He discussed
this with Borough Mayor Thompson in Sept. that he
could not make payments but could stay current. The
Mayor said he would get back to Mr. Baxter, but did
not. He is staying current. He has sold an asset
that will go towards the bill. His figure is $11,000,
the City's figure is different. The $16,000 figure
is before he made payments.
Atty. Carson said the note was secured to the Borough
by a deed of trust and a confession of judgement.
There was also an agreement that he would make monthly
payments on the sales tax. He added Mr. Baxter was in
the hospital for some time this Fall. He would ask
that Council investigate thin matter. A delinquency
for a prior year with that amount of surety is at
best heavy handed. Vie have an on-goinq business that
has paid its sales tax this year. President Pro Tempers
Malston asked Clerk Whelan if she has heard from the Borough
since. Clerk Whelan replied yes, Borough Atty. Kashi
had said he would take legal action.
MOTION:
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to rescind their letter of objection regard-
ing Rainbow Bar till Atty. Delahay contacts the
Borough Atty. to find out how much is owed.
?'I
KENAI CITY Comm.
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 2
Councilman Measles asked, has the letter of objection
been sent? Clerk Whelan ropliod yes. President
Pro Tempore Malston asked, if Council withdraws 0 G x Gr
their objection, will that help Mr. Ma"benq
Carson replied yes. He added, perhaps Council should
contact the Borough before they withdraw the letter.
He doesn't know if the Borough has protested,
if Council withdraws, ABC may insuo the license.
Councilman Wise said a letter of objection would call
for a public hearing by the Commission. We don't
want to force a public hearing, what are we faced
with? Atty. Carson replied, a public hearing would
be the middle of the Summer. Councilman Wagoner
said we want a promissory note with the Borough. He
saw no objection to sending a letter of non -objection,
Mr. Baxter is paying current.
MOTION, Amendments
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, to amend the motion to have Atty. Delahay
and the Borough Atty, discuss and verify the statements
of the Rainbow Bar. If correct, a letter should be
sent without further action of Council.
VOTE, Amendments
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
VOTE, Main Motion as Amendeds
Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
Councilman Wise said we need straight action, not
by attorneys. The chief executives should handle it.
It sounds like there is more than meets the eye. President
Pro Tempore Malston suggested City Manager Brighton
discuss this with Borough Mayor Thompson and the
attorneys.
Council agreed to the suggestion.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C-1 Resolution 82-18 - Transfer of Funds - Seven Employees
Attend Dale Carnegie Course - $4,550
NOTIONS
Councilman Mueller moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to adopt the resolution.
There was no public comment.
Councilman Wise said he had no objection to the use
of the funds, but a companion item on the agenda in-
creases overtime for the Fire Dept. out of fund balance.
We are also dipping into fund balance for another
operation. He doesn't like to take from contingency.
We are in the habit of tapping fund balance too often.
They should be found within existing fund balance.
City Manager Brighton suggested Council could amend
the resolution to another fund.
VOTES
Motion passed with Councilman Wagoner voting no.
C-2 Resolution 82-19 - Transfer of Funds - Additional
Electric Costs in Sewer Service Dept. - $1,500
,
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
Feb. 5, 1982
Page 3
MOTIONS
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, to adopt the resolution.
There was no public comment.
Motion passed by unanimous consent.
C-3 Resolution 82-20 - Awarding Contract for senior
Citizen Center Design i Const. - C. Gintoli
MOTIONS
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, to adopt the resolution.
There was no public comment.
Councilman Wagoner asked if this included inspection.
Mr. Gintoli replied yes. Councilman Wiso noted on
the last WHEREAS, the Public Works Committee has not
reviewed it.
MOTION, Amendments
Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller,
to amend the motion to delete the portion of the
resolution after the last WHEREAS.
Councilman Measles said it will not be awarded till
Public Works Committee has reviewed. Councilman Wise
said there are two members of the committee at the
Council meeting, that is a review.
VOTE, Amendments
Motion passed with Councilman Wagoner voting no.
MOTION, Reconsiderations
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, for reconsideration of the amendment.
VOTE, Reconsiderations
Motion failed unanimously by roll call vote.
VOTE, Main Motions
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
C-4 Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - City
Participation in Alaska-1984
Public Comments
Waldo Coyle spoke. He would like clarification on
this. Some fast promoters have gotten $3 Million out
of this. You have a year to make a fair of this. It
cannot be done. He is against it.
MOTION► Tables
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to table this till the next meeting.(2-17-a2)
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
r-
I
M
0,
:n�:rts'�::.a:stejLltatsE �v.Jq�J�
r,
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 4
City Manager Brighton explained, Administration
was asked to appropriate $2,000. We cannot approp-
riate that till we receive it. It is important
that Council note the contract they will have to
bind. That is not the information they wore given
at the time of the meeting. Councilman Wagoner
noted Council was told by the representatives of
Alaska 1984 that we would have the money the next
day.
D. MINUTES
0-1 Regular Meeting, Jan. 20, 1982
a. Verbatim, Jan. 20, 1982
Clerk Whelan said Atty. Delahay had asked that page
18, item H-2, #21 line 2 be changed to read, "the
Kenai Advisory Planning i Zoning approved. They
said one---." Further changes in f2, line 7, the
words "ask to" be added after the 2nd "and."
Minutes were approvedt as changed.
E. CORRESPONDENCE
None
F. OLD BUSINESS
P-1 Carmen Gintoli - Airport Schematics
Mr. Gintoli explained he has incorporated comments
from the last meeting and have had a meeting with
the users group. They have added 10 feet of space
to the baggage area, moved the ticket area, taken
out 10 ft, moved the Airport Manager's office, moved
the security area and added a sliding glass panel to
open when no se^urity is needed. The Telephone Co.
had requested a separate telephone room, this was
.added and they have included some pay phones. Re-
garding closing off the bathrooms, the restaurant
will be open 24 hours a day next summer and the
terminal is open 24 hours a day. They will have a
gate there. Councilman Wise asked if they were
going to put in Arctic doors and electric doors in
both foyers. Mr. Gintoli replied yes. There was
discussion regarding electric and revolving doors,
this will be decided during progress reports.
Wayne Stephens, Wien Air Alaska spoke. He has re-
ceived a letter from Jack Nelson, Vice President
in charge of properties. He recommended the plan
as proposed Jan. 28, 1982. Mr. Stephens added the
Kenai operations also agreed with the plan.
Airport Manager Swalley said at the Jan. 28 meeting
all but one organization was represented, all present
agreed it was the best plan.
MOTION:
Councilman Wagoner moves!, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to see an alt� note onto this expansion
to the north 20-30 ;4 ft. so at bid time w could
add on. 41e c ld have two, one at 20-30 y�ft.,
one at 10 s ft.
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 5
Mr. Gintoli suggested it be done in modules of 15
or 30 sq. ft. Councilman Wagoner explained this
was so we can expand the project without coming
back to Council.
MOTION, Amendments
Councilman Wagoner moved to amard tho amount to
15 to 30 sq. ft.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Councilman Wise said he was not in favor because we
will not have all the carriArs ;►ere next year. Secondly
we will need funds for amenities in the terminal. There
are no monies for amenities. Councilman Measles said
these are added alternates that can go out to bid.
That will happen at the time of contract. Mr. Gintoli
said total cost at this time is $1,663,000.
VOTES
Motion passed with Councilman Wise voting no.
MOTIONS
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Mueller, to direct Mr. Gintoli to proceed with the
schematics and additional working drawings in prep-
aration for bid.
Councilman Wise objected. He said we have talked
with Council and the users, but not with the public.
There should be a public hearing and then adopt the
program. Councilman Wagoner noted it had been ad-
vertised in the media, they have had many meetings.
If we don't get this into the street, there will be
other projects in the street and it will be delayed.
VOTES
Motion passed with Councilman Wise voting no.
Councilman Wise asked for a phasing plan. Mr. Gintoli
reviewed the phases of construction. He noted, any
areas of construction will have no people in them.
Councilman Wagoner asked to compliment Mr. Gintoli
on his work.
F-2 Carmen Gintoli - Library Schematics
Mr. Gintoli introduced Chuck Hauck, co-worker.
Mr. Gintoli said they have reviewed the plans with the
Library Committee. They are proposing basically the
same structure. They are doubling the stacking area.
There will be a larger area for periodicals, reading
area. He suggested the movies area be an added alternate.
With the added alternate, there will be 9,180 sq. ft.
The existing area is 5,100 sq. ft. Basic construction
cost is $805,200, with furniture i equipment $1,035,424,
with added alternates $1,292,496. Operations and
maintenance for 9,180 sq, ft. is $24,717 the first
year. Councilman Wagoner noted the reading room is
3,380 sq. ft., that is more than the entire comminity
college library serves more than 500 students.
R .
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Pogo 6
MOTION:
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to eliminate alternate N1 and the stack
area and ro-work the back. area.
Librarian Deforest explained in order to maintain
uniformity of areas, they should not cross over areas.
With the stack area where it is, the attendants could
could supervise the stack area. They had hoped to
have computer areas put in, with the changes they
will not be able to he used. The reading room is
not being used just for a reading room only. Council-
man Wagoner suggested we should compare to what the
size would be. Thore are other methods to achieve
what they want. Librarian DePorost said much of the
equipment we would not expect to purchase with City
funds. City Manager Brighton asked, what if they
don't get the funds? Librarian DePorost replied they
will have an empty table. Councilman Wine noted they
will have 8-fold the table and coating capacity in
the new reading room. Librarian DoPorost explained
by the time they move the record storage area, eta.
thoro will not be that much room. We should have
82 seats for this size community. Councilman Mueller
asked, what percentage of the prosent seating is being
used now? Librarian DePorost replied in winter - 1/2,
in summer, they are on the floor. Councilman Wise
asked if they could have the conceptual use before
acting on this. Librarian Deforest replied yes.
Councilman Wagoner said he has a problem with the
movie and craft area. We have spent 045,000 for a
01 per year rental to a group that will do arts i
crafts. The reading room could be changed to a
movie area. Librarian DePorost explained that is
why it was an added alternate. Councilman Wise
said some of hose things are being done in the
Arts Center. He would like to see a comprehensive
plan developed that would develop the library, Pt.
Xonay, Senior Citizens Center, Arta Center. Additional
storage and stacks are a must, but if we proceed the
way we are going, we are going to have more facilities
than we have people.
Council agreed that Administration integrate the
library, Senior Citizens Center, etc. to come up
with an overview of how the facilities will overlap.
Councilman Wagoner suggested Mr. Gintoli will not be
able to help without money. City Manager Brighton
said he had a pretty good idea of what we have now.
Mr. Gintoli said he would work with City Manager
Brighton as a City present.
f-1 Carmen Gintoli - Airport schematics (contd)
MOTIONS
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to adopt the guidelines as presented by
Airport Manager Swalley regarding over the counter
freight handling in the terminal.
Airport Manager Swalley explained under the current
situation, all leases expire Juno 30, 1982, with the
exception of the bar i restaurant and FAA, fie in
working for recommendations that will help us in
future problems such as last summer. He added policies
such as these go in an addendums on the leases.
President Pro Temporo Ilalaton asked, will the carriers still
be able to handle small packages? Mr. Swalley replied
I
SP.NAI CITY COUNCII:
Pru. 5, 1982
Page 7
you, 411ya11e larger hau to go to another araa.
Motion paused with Councilman Wine voting no.
P-3 Water i Sower Rates
Pinanco Director Brown explained he has increased
the rates on water & newer by 10%. Water L sower
aystomn will pay for themselves.
NOTIONS
Councilman Wiso moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner,
to have the water i oswor ratan published in full in
a local publication and a public hearing be hold at
the next regular meeting.
Councilman Wise explained we may be exempt by PUC,
but PUC ban to publish their rates. We have soon
some recent announcements that are horrifying, this
City ought not to be afraid to publish their rates.
City Manager Brighton noted when the City got the loan
to make additions to water t sawor, they committed
themselves to cover their expenses. President Pro
Tomporo Molaton said that could be put in the publi-
cation.
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
4. NEW BUSINESS
4-1 Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
NOTIONS
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to approve the billings.
Motion passed unanimously by roll call veto.
4-2 Requisitions Exceeding 01,000
MOTIONS
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, to approve the requisitions.
Motion passed by unanimous consent.
4-3 Ordinance 755-82 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code
to Modify Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda
at Council Meetings
Councilman Wise asked that Council defer action till
Council is in full strength. Councilman Measles
said ho didn't see any problem with introduction.
City Manager Brighton explained the original intent
was to have majority rule instead of unanimous con-
sent. The Attorney, with request of the Clerk, asked
for the amendment as distributed this date (2-5-82)
to amend the mayor to City Manager.
MOTIONS
Councilman Measles moved, noconded by Councilman
Mueller, to introduce the subutltuto ordinance.
M
n
w
KENAI CITY COUNCIL,
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 8
MOTION, Amendments
Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner,
to anend the ordinance to delete majority vote and
reinstate unanimous consent.
VOTE, Amendments
Motion failed, with Councilman Wise voting yes.
Councilman Wise asked, who asked for the amendment?
Councilman Mueller replied he did. Clerk Whelan
said she asked for the 2nd amendment. Councilman
Wise said if the agenda had been amended 24 hours
prior to the meeting, it could have been acted on
without Council action. Anyone can railroad a change
through at 6s00 Wed. night, this is dangerous.
VOTES
Motion passed, with Councilman Wise voting no.
City Manager Brighton said upon passage at the next
meeting, it can be amended. We are not trying to
steamroll the ordinance. Councilman Wise said Title
29 amendments at the Legislature may be amended to
require that following public hearing any substitute
amendment will be barred by law without another public
hearing.
G-4 Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Overtime for
Fire Dept. - $18,300
MOTION:
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to introduce the ordinance.
Councilman Wise said we are increasing estimated
revenues and taking from fund balance. We should
search the budget as it exists and find money that
is there.
VOTES
Motion passed, with Councilman wise voting no.
Councilman Wagoner said he has a problem with the
figures as presented. He would .like a breakdown
of how Administration arrived at this amount. He
comes up with $11,000. Finance r-irector Brown ex-
plained the Fire Chief cannot predict the exact
amount of overtime, and some peo,,la will receive
merit increases.
G-5 Lease Application - Terminal Building - Sea Airmotive
City Manager Brighton explained, some time ago Council
voted to bring this up at this date. (2-5-82) It is
moot now, as it has been handled.
Council took no action.
G-6 Agreement Between Bob Roper and City of Kenai
MOTIOns
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Mueller, to approve the agreement.
j,.
,i
i
- rat.�ir1G�lJ' •..
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 9
Councilman Wise said with 2 members absent, and one
has a pointed view on this, we should wait till next
meeting. Ile added he would abstain from voting.
NOTION:
Councilman wise moved to table action till the
Feb. 17, 1982 meeting.
Motion failed for ldak of a second.
City Manager Brighton said this is a subject that
has been addressed for 2 years at least. It has been
talked to death. If the absence of one or two members
will stymie action, we sould not have meetings without
full attendance. Council will have to face up to
action. The time has come to either do it or forget
it. Councilman Wagoner said there are 2 members absent.
Right down the line it has been a 2-2 vote all the
time. It won't make any difference. Let's get it
over with. Councilman Wise said he would abstain, he
has been involved with the City and Mr. Roper and
would like to abstain. He added he has abstained
prevlousiy. President Pro Tempore Malston accepted
his request for abstention.
VOTES
Motion passed, with President Pro Tempers Malston
voting no and Councilman Wise abstaining.
City Manager Brighton noted Council must authorize
him to make payment.
MOTIONS
Councilman Mueller moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, to authorize funds to be paid for this
contract.
Motion passed, with President Pro Tempore Malston
voting no.
G-7 Games of Chance i Skill - American Legion #20
MOTION:
Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman
Wagoner, for approval of the application.
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
G-8 Games of Chance 6 Skill - Eagles i3525
MOTIONS
Councilman wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Mueller, for approval of the application.
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
H. REPORTS
H-1 City Manager
City Manager Brighton spoke. u
1. He has written a letter of protest to DEC regarding
the Kenai landfill, with a copy to the Borough
Meyor. He has had no reply yet.
Y_'
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 10
2. Regarding the memo from Finance Director
w� Brown in Lhe packet on the 10% pay increase.
" Administration will need Council direction to
—,� proceed. President Pro 'rempore Malston said
V _ they cannot take a vote. Mr. Brighton ropliod,
' d just a concensus, not a vote. After some dis-
cussion, Finance Director Brown explained, based
.i on past budgets, Administration prepares this
on indication of Council. If Council does not
wish to give an indication, Administration will
do as they feel is right. If the likelihood of
change is great, Council might as well let
Administration do it. Councilman Wise said we
have not resolved the FICA problem yot. Till that
is resolved, we cannot make a suggestion. We
should have a work session of Council as a whole.
Councilman Wagoner said the FICA problem is a
separate problem.
Council agreed Administration will do without guidance
from Council.
` 3. City Manager Brighton said the parking lot plan
in the packet was approved by Council some time
ago. This will accomodate 500 cars. Council
noted the rental car arrangement was incorrect.
I ; MOTIONs
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Measles, to refer the matter to the Airport Committee
for further study. If there isn't one, the Mayor can
I appoint one.
Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.
Councilman Wise suggested Administration prepare a
funding ordinance so engineering can be done to plan
completion of the parking lot to coincide with re-
novation of the terminal.
H-2 City Attorney
None
" t H-3 Mayor
None
H-4 City Clerk
,x Clerk Whelan spoke.
1. The American Legion #20 has paid their sales
taxes to the Borough Jan. 29, 1982. The Council
had submitted an objection to renewal of their
liquor license based on non-payment. She asked
Council to submit a letter of non -objection.
MOTIONS
. .J
- -.- Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Wise, to send a letter of non -objection to ABC re-
garding American Legion.
Motion passed by unanimous consent.
2. The Borough notified Clerk Whelan that the
information giver•. to her previously was incorrect.
The Harborview has over $22,000 not paid in taxes.
j
t
-�!'nYAfl�►�yi'{Te'Y1tTa!f�+•.•Pe•r, .-.�r.rNYf�
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 11
Council had submitted a letter of non -objection
to ABC, based on incorrect information.
Council agreed to have Administration check this before
taking any further action.
3. Clark Whelan asked for vacation leave from
March 18 through April 1. There will not be
any Council meetings.
Council agreed to the request.
Clark Whelan said there should be an acting -
acting City Clerk as the acting City Clerk will
be on maternity leave.
MOTIONS
Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman
Wise, to authorize the Clerk to appoint the acting
Clerk.
Motion passed by unanimous consent.
H-5 Finance Director
None
H-6 Planning h Zoning
None
H-7 Harbor Commission
Harbor Commission Chairman Williams spoke. The
Harbor Commission had an investigative meeting with
representatives of NorTek to determine if they had
the capabilities to continue on with the study.
Chairman Williams said he felt we should bring in
2 companies to take a look at this. He would like
to have the concept of one company for the overall
design and engineering. He asked City Manager
Brighton, what is the time frome with Tams Engrg.?
Mr. Brighton replied we have received an answer,
they are interested in having a meeting. Chairman
Williams said he told the engineer we would have
an answer within 30 days.
Chairman Williams said he would set up a meeting and
call City Manager Brighton.
Councilman Wise asked, a letter was sent to CH2M Hill
terminating the contract. Have they acknowledged?
City Manager Brighton replied yes, the letter was
sent Return Receipt Requested, but there has not been
a formal reply. Finance Director Brown said he has
spoken with Mr. Lohman, he discussed it and is aware.
I. PEPSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
1. City Manager Brighton asked Police Chief Ross
to speak on the 911 situation.
Chief Ross said they have had several meetings
since the last report. The $390,000 appropriated
to the Borough has already boon appropriated by
the Borough. The committee is looking at proposals
now. Of the $160,000 to $180,000 expenditure,
the majority is switchboard capability. Annual
operating costs are $95,o0o total, $62,000 is
line aha(�ngas from Glacier State. This will
A_a,{i0,-
KENAI CITY COUNCIL.
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 12
carry us through FY 1984. ono luylalator is
working to got it past that time. It could
become a State function. Whether the State
will continuo after that time is anyone's guess.
About $1.25 per month to each subscriber could
fund the program on the phone hill. President
Pro Temporo Malaton asked if the operating costs
included operators. Chief Rona replied no, Public
Safety will operate at no charge if the balance
Will be used for one personnel for Public Safety.
There is a minor amount for materials. Council-
man Wise asked if there had been any consideration
given to integrate the system with the present
flap over ambulance service. Chief Rose replied
no, but if Council wishes it to be brought up, he
will. Councilman Wise said 911 will support am-
bulance service and should be under consideration.
Also, Administration shoula have some idea of
funding.future is emergency medical Tand ea 911.Futurelfundingation eshould
be considered in case the State pulls out. Chief
Ross said he would bring it up to the committee.
As to future funding, that is policy of the
elected officials. City Manager Brighton noted
the Assembly has appropriated the money. They
are acting as a pass -through agency. The
committee has not submitted a budget to the Assy.
They do not have to. The committee has respons-
ibility
val- Chief Roseaction added hetdid tnlegislative pro-
realizethQ
Assembly had appropriated the money at the last
meeting. Councilman Measles asked, didn't the
State say they would not fund on -going opera-
tional costs? Chief Ross replied the Governor
slashed it in half without explanation. Council-
man Wagoner suggested a delay t£ll•we know any
further information from the committee on funding
after 1984. Chief Ross asked if Council wished
him to ask for involvement in the new service
area when the dust settles. Councilman wagoner
said maybe the City should get involved with
service areas. He noted the platforms are in
Kenai election precinct f3. Maybe we should
annex them for a service area. City Manager
Brighton said that has been asked of the City
Attorney. Chief Ross said there is a meeting
on Feb. 11. Is the Council feeling that the
City reserves any statement on their involvement
at this time? He thought the 911 will go.
City Manager Brighton said he thought the Council
is willing to participate and cooperate with 911
till such time as the citizens of Kenai are asked
to pay 112 of the cost and the City is asking
for the right to withdraw at that time. We can
give the people service without cost. President
Pro Tempore Malaton asked, if it came to that,
how willing would the City be at that time to
Opt out? We have asked Chief Ross to participate
till the time when we can vote to participate
or not. Councilman Wise said he is concerned
about future funding, someone has to have the
power to fund it. Without alternative programs
to fund, this a sword hanging over our head.
Chi -If Ross said we cannot provide 911 to residents
at this time because of the extent of the 283
exchange. We would have done it before if we
could have. WO will participate if this goes.
Council can limit themselves as to funding.
it will be difficult to pull out once we have
come in. At the Feb. 11 meeting the Board of
Directors can go out to bid and start action.
m
, `! :-a*AW-*"0.wy4f Q
•.
i
J
.. Mm
it
1.
j
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
FEB. 5, 1982
Page 13
Councilman Wise asked, who handles the funds?
Chief Ross replied it is a non-profit organiza-
tion. The money was put through as a grant to
the Board. As of Feb. 11, the Board can approp-
riate money. President Pro Tempers Malston
asked, Kenai would be in it, or do we have a
choice? Chief Ross replied, if you say you do
not want in it, you will be saying you wish to
keep the 283 exchange out. Councilman Wagoner
suggested we should continue to pursue till we
come to funding, then let Council decide.
Council agreed to the suggestion.
Council agreed the questions Councilman wise brought
up should be answered.
2. Ruby Coyle spoke. At the last Borough meeting
an ordinance was introduced that the percentage
on the Borough Mayor election be lowered from
50% to 40%. The people should be aware of it.
The Borough Mayor has lots of power, he can
veto and it takes 3/4 vote to override. That
much power should not be electod by 401 of
the Assembly. we could be stuck with a person
for 6 years and he could be a no good person.
March 2 is the hearing date. Anyone with that
much power should have 50% of the vote.
3. Harbor Commission Chairman Williams asked to
compliment Council on the handling of the meeting.
4. Councilman John Wise said the airport pilots and
operators will be having a meeting. He saw FAA
program for the City for the next 15 years. There
are a couple of projects that should be approved
by the City. The pilots are talking about float
plane operations. He suggested Administration
should prepare an ordinance appropriating $5,000
for preliminary engineering of float plane basin
for ADAP or State Grant applications out of
airport land balances.
No action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
fleeting adjourned at 1000 PM.
Q� '7 � o
et Whelan, City Clerk
ROUTE 2. BOX 743
SOLOOTNA, ALASKA 00660
PATRICK M. O'CONNELL -':: 1907 1 sss-ssas
REPRESENTATIVE
DISTRICT 13 Y,�l' WHILE IN JUNEAU
POUCH V
JUNEAU, ALASKA 00811
��v115c of �-IcprYsriltati%r5
08 February 1982
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
City of Kenai
Box 580
Kenai, AK 99611
Dear Ms. Whelan:
I have received Resolution No. 82-2 from the Kenai City Council re-
questing an amendment to Chapter 40 of HB 170.
Although 1 share the concerns of Kenai City Council regarding the policy
of this issue, the House Community and Regional Affairs Committee is
unable to act on any further amendments at this time. The Committee
Substitute for HB 170 was voted out of Committee on January 27 and is
now in the House Rules Committee.
Needless to say, we are very anxious for the passage of CSHB 170 and
CSSS 180. Because of the magnitude of this legislation, and the many
man hours that have been put into the revision, I am hesitant to offer
any amendments on the House floor. 1 fear this could create a blizzard
of explosive issues that we would not want tied to the revision legislation.
However, the subject of Resolution No. 82-2 should be resolved along
with a number of other issues. It is my intention to continue work on
the areas throughout the bill that still need to be resolved and perhaps
included in separate "clean-up" legislation to Title 29.
Once again, I appreciate your concerns and am working toward the ap-
propriate amendments to insure that long term planning and zoning for
cities will not be withdrawn without the city's consent.
Res ctfully,
MR
Patrick M. O'Connell
Representative
PMO/rmc
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 82-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
REQUESTING AMENDING LANGUAGE TO THE PROPOSED TITLE 29 (SB 180),
CHAPTER 40, PLATTING, PLANNING ArID LAND USE REGULATIONS.
WHEREAS, the present language of the proposed revisions of Title
29 contained in SB 180 regarding delegation and revocation of
planning and platting powers to cities placed an undue burden on
the cities; and,
WHEREAS, if the assembly had unlimited power to revoke planning
and zoning cowers, the cities would be severely restricted in
organizing a long term planning and zoning program; and,
WHEREAS, if the City takes on the responsibility and fiscal costs
of planning and zoning powers, the City must have assurances that
those powers will not be withdrawn at will;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that Chapter 40, Section 29.40.010, the second
sentence of Paragraph b of the proposed Title 29 contained in SB
180 should be amended to read:
The Borough assembly, with the consent of the Council of the
„I City, may revoke any power or responsibility delegated under this
section.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon adoption of this resolution,
copies be sent to Senator Don Gilman, Representative Hugh Malone,
Repre entative Patrick O'Connell and men!bers of the Title 29
committee of the House and Senate.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 6th day
of January, 1982.
• VIi:CEilT C' hL•'ILLY (- r AYCR
ATTEST:
Janet :-helar., City Clt�ri:
r
A
• .fir. .. ..1. f
� 1
1
_ .. Sri
JAYE a
E-- 2
JAY s. A94MAPOW sortaraw
L�
465-2653 JVWN0--avKAar�o 1
December 16, 1981 "
j ' VF K!.!•A!
Dear Alaskan:
Enclosed for your information are:
1) a copy of the state regulations regarding "Smoking in Public
Places" which became effective August 29, 1981; and
2) a "fact sheet" which highlights important provisions
of the regulations.
I encourage you to read them carefully to ascertain if any of the pro-
visions (e.g., posting signs or providing a smoking area) apply to any
area or vehicle under your control. I
Please contact any departmental regional or district office for appro-
priate signs or if you have any questions. You may also call me (collect)
at 465-2626.
f' I
Your assistance and cooperation in implementing the regulations is
appreciated.
i
Sincer ,
`a I
oe Cladouhos, Chief -
Environmental Health s
r
r
a_ . .
f.l: VILATION FACT
r
Smok i nr i u banns;. t :
---------------in all roc:nF, hous.na public m1•ut4n,;:. :;punnored by jr,y
r.tate a4tency, rc:Ja.dlusa of whetter the mo,st.ang 1:; it, it
state office buildinh, hotel, rontaursnt, (jr local
assembly ghamber;
---------------in al. J ub:i nuol%., iil.: 3r;c:., muscumn, swiriminy
pools;, or other publicly owned and operated places of
entertainment or recreation;
---------------in all elevators and limousines for hire;
-------------- -in all public areas of hospitals and nursing homes, such
as waiting rooms, restroomn, lobbies, and hallways.
in addition, smoking must be segregated in buses and state -operated
ferries.
Smoking areas must be provided in all public places and vehicles with
the exception of elevators and limousines for hire. Owners of an
affected building are not required to confront individual violators.
Complaints concerning smoking in public places or signs not being posted
may be reported to any regional or district ADEC office. Court action
on complaints may result in a civil fine plus court costs and any
attorney's fees. Violations involving posting of signs may result in a
maximum fine of $100; smoking in prohibited areas may result in a fine
of up to $25 per offense.
Any questions or requests for additional copies of the regulations may
be directed to ADEC's central office or to any ADEC regional office.
ADEC Central Office
Pouch O
Juneau AK 99811
(907) 465-2640
Northern Regional Office Southcentral Regional Office
P.O. Box 1601 437 "E" Street --Second Floor
Fairbanks AK 99707 Anchorage A1: 99501
(907) 452-1714 (907) 274-2533
Southeast Regional Office
P.O. Box 2420
Juneau AK 99803
(907) 789-3151
-i-,-r is
THE FOLLOWING CHECKS ARV, OVER $1.1100.00 WHICH N
COUNCII, APPROVAL Olt KATIFIr,A'II014 L/l//SL
YF,NIVII
AHU Nt
DESr.I1IPTiOq
PROJECT/b 31AR'IIIENT
ACC011ffr 171AROF,
AY.al"oT
i'f)n
FOR APPROVAL:
Air Tok
7,914.00
757 of Electrical Itenovntlnna
Nun-bapnrtmontol
R,•pnir b flalutennn,a
/")14.00
11/a0
of Fine Art Cvntor
Carr's
1,468.45
Wahtebaaketn 6 Cup llnngern
sill
Operntlsg Supplleu
11.57
f18',Z
Camera Film
Jnf1
Oparnting Suppllea
Yarn
Community Services
Operntlne, Suppllea
Pt. it)
1118,7
Point & sup;!f.es
Intl
Repnir b Italnt. Supplies
147.81
11811
Coffee b Paror Towets
Fire
Operating Suppllnn
91.62
s18S6
Light Bulbs
Plre
Repair b Nnint. Supplies
31%1;4
Humidifier
I'll-Finnnce
office SupplLon
142.00
3191Z
Groceries for Jan.
COA-Coug. Hanle
Operating Supplleu
522.86
31405
Groceries for Jan.
COA-lieme Delivery
Operating Suppliers
130.71
31605
Chevron USA
30044,86
Ganoline
Shop
Operating Suppllnn
2,170.83
3181)1
Gasoline
shop
Operating SupplLun
874.03
31778
Chumley's Urethane
2,b70.00
Spray Urethane at Pine Arts
Nr)n-Departmental
Repair b Hnintennnre
2,n70.00
314411
Center
Doyloo Fuel
1,568.39
Stove Oil.
Shnp
Operating Supplleu
1,164.05
32O A
Stove Oil
shop
Operating Supplies
404.14
318/1
Carmen GLnto1L
7,900.0
Arch. Services
CI' -Terminal l(egovation
Engineering/Inspect.
7,900.00
Glacier state
2,161.57
Fub. Phone Service
Various
Communications
2,11)1.57
Homer Eloctric
17.334.67
Jan. Eloctricity
Various
Utilities
17,134.67
marathon 011
11,095.88
Dec. Natural Gas
Trust b Agency
In Trust
11,095.88
Petarkin Dist.
1,335.76
Concession Foods
Recreation
Operating Supplies
29.65
31966
Groceries - Feb.
COA-Cong. Heals
Operating supplion
489.53
31998
Groceries - Feb.
COA-Nome Delivery
Operating Suppliva
122.38
31483
Inmate food
Jail
Operating Supplies
694.20
31791
(,HF,(:Kq OVER $1.000.00
2111182 PAU 7
TVI,NtX)R
A"IUNT
1)F,%(:R I PT 1014
PROJECT/ 11Y.PART1411,HT
ACMUNT CHAMP,
AIRMINT
P(Ift
Ron's Rentall
1,166.90
Wheelo For lit-wer
street"
Its -pair 1, MaInt. Supplien 21.94
31818
.lark 11nmmer Rental
Shop
Rentals
45.()0
311111
Pipe Now
Water
flarUnery 6 Equipment
609.95
11818
Chain SAW
street"
Hnrhinery 6 Equipment
365.80
311jol
Elbow Yor Pump
Shop
Repair 6 Mnint. Supplies 6.30
31913
Rent Jack Hnniner
Building Inspection
Rentalo
48.00
31912
Rent Electric Hammer
Water
Rentals
45.00
31914
Tool Rental
shop
Rental
24.95
31826
Seattle Trust
26,424.55
167 G.O. Honda
'67 Debt Service
Interest
Z6,245.00
Agent Fees
179.55
southcentral, Comm.
1,499.00
Transmitter Repair
police
Repair 1, Maintenance
162.50
31836
Feb. Radio Maintenance
Various
Repair 6 Maintenance
1,262.50
30107
08ttOry ROP14MM011t
Police
"air 6 Maint. Supplies 74.00
320o4
w0awn's Resource
6,109.95
Jan. child Care
Women's Roaource
Accounts RecelV4blO
6,109.95
FOR RATIVICATIONs
Blue Cross
11,802.26
Feb. Medical Insurance
Various
Health Insurance
11,802.26
Clary In*.
8,443.00
Doe, Workmen's Comp,
Various
Workmen's Compenantion
8,443.00
KUSCO
4.460.94
Jan. Gas Usage
Various
Utilities
4,460.94
Union Oil
11,086.42
Dec. Natural Gnu
Trust & Agency
In Trust
11,086.42
first Federal,
1,000,000.00
Cart. Of Deposit 2/2/82
TCD
Central Treasury
1,0()0,000.00
1,000,000.00
Cart. Of Deposit 2/2/82
TCD
Central Treasury
1,000,000.00
National Bank
2,210tOOO.0
REPO 2/1/82
Central Treasury
Central Treasury
2,210,000.00
IlZ Int.
of Alaska
1,210,t)ut).00
REPO 2/2/82
Central Treasury
Central Treasury
1,210,000.00
12Z Int.
950,000.00
REPO 2/11/82
Central Treasury
Central Treasury
950,000.00
122 Int.
f
■
REQUISITIONS OVER 61,000.00 WHICH NERD COUNCIL APPROVAL 2/17/82
VENDOR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Fire Control N.W. 7 - 4.5 Scutt Cylinders FR-Fire Machinery b Equipm,•nt 1,470.00
�.i f �� ^I • '� r Sl./� �r � : /a: "}-•� �. �r� - iC! / y i i/.s-ter.-. � � S
1 - 11'
G3
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 757-82
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82
AIRPORT TERMINAL FUND BUDGET BY $30,500 FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARKING LOTS AT THE AIRPORT TERMINAL.
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai desires to upgrade and expand the
parking lots at the Airport Terminal Building, and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to retain an engineer for preparation of
plans and specifications for such improvements.
WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all
appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues
and appropriations be made in the Airport Terminal Fund Budget:
Increase Estimated Revenues:
Appropriation of Retained Earnings 30.500
Increase Appropriations:
Administration S 500
Engineering 30,000
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day
of March, 1982.
ATTEST:
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
Approved by Finance: Fes_
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR
First Reading: February 17, 1982
Second Reading: March 3, 1982
Effective Date: March 3, 1982
r
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 758-82
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82
AIRPORT LAND SYSTEM BUDGET,BY $5,300 FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
AND PREPARATION OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A FLOAT PLANE
BASIN.
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is in need of a float plane basin, and
desires to file an application with the Federal Aviation
Administration for a grant for its construction, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain an engineer for preliminary
engineering and preparation of the grant application.
WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all
appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues
.and appropriations be made in the 1981-82 Airport Land System
Budgets
Increase Estimated Revenues:
Appropriation of Fund Balance $5,3 0
Increase Appropriations:
Airport Administration -Administration S 300
Airport Administration -Engineering 5,00Q
Q
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day
of March, 1982,
VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR
ATTESTS
Janet Whelan, City Clerk~
First Reading: February 17, 1982
Second Reading: March 3, 1982
Effective Date: March 3, 1982
Approved by Finance: %_
T.�
09MATOR
llf"' M. "EO" OANKWORI'H
RC�R[I
SENATETE DISTRISTRICC
T ti•J
CONMITTC[[
/INANCE. CO•CNAIRMAN
RULES. VIC[.CHAIRMAN
TRANGPORTATION
LEOISuATIVE BUDGET 6 AUDIT
R.
J
moms A6bR[i[
E'25 HIALEAH DRIVE
ANCHORAGE. AL ASKA 00403
HOME PHONEI (007) A77.0683
IN 0[[OION
POUCH V
JUNEAU.ALAOKA 00811
PHONEI (007) 445•3753
Mayor Vince O'Reilly ' `F
�Ahts to j tatc ` Lxgblaturr
r ..ice
**ate
January 29, 1982
City of Kenai
P.O. Box 500
Kenai, Alaska 99G11
Dear Ilayor 0' R i 1 11Vt:1-dly:
I expressed to you on your recent visit to Juneau my disappointment
In the Council passing Resolution #227 opposing State development
of the LaTouche harbor. I remain confident that if the facts were
known to the council they would not oppose the project. It is for
this reason that 1 respectfully request that you present to the
council the attached statement on the need for the project with the
hope that they will consider rescinding their action in adopting the
resolution. I regret that I cannot personally attend the meeting
and present my reasons for developing the Sound for recreation.
Vince, thanks again for the nice visit when you were in Juneau and
be assured of my continued cooperation on matters of interest to
Kenai.
ED/pm
S/c)YO /J
ED DANKUORT11
Senator
t
PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND DEVELOPMENT
Political candidates in Anchorage often have
pointed out the need to develop the recreational potential
of Prince William Sound for Anchorage and other areas
of the State.
From North to South, the traffic is bumper to bumper,
the campgrounds are crowded and the harbors are filled to
capacity with 4 year waiting lists while hundreds of boats
sit dry docked in Anchorage front yards. Existing recrea-
tional facilities in southcentral Alaska, especially the
Kenai Pennisula, are overloaded. The Railbelt needs an
alternative.
As a legislator, I have worked hard to meet my
commitment to Anchorage to open up the Sound in a way that
guarantees access to a majority of Alaskans like myself
with limited budgets and not just to those who own airplanes
and big boats. To date, I have concentrated on projects
which will improve road and rail access to Whittier, increase
the size of the Whittier harbor, provide road access and a
small boat harbor at Shotgun Cove, and expand ferry service
throughout the Sound including a new stop at the San Juan
hatchery in Sawmill Bay.
My latest proposal is a public boat dock and harbor on
the island of Latouche. In my opinion, this project is one
of the most important steps that will be taken in the
development of Prince William Sound. Nevertheless, a
number of legitimate questions have been asked concerning
the desirability or need for a recreational facility at
this location. At first glance it might appear that building
a dock on an island with few inhabitants is not in the
State's best interest. Yet, nothing could be further from
the truth. The people of Anchorage, the Kenai Pennisula
and the Railbelt in general have a tremendous interest in
the present and future development of the recreational
potential of Prince William Sound including Latouche Island.
Latouche Island is centrally located between Whittier
and Seward, 55 miles from each. It sits within 100 yards
of an Alaskan ferry route and is in the middle of some of
the richest fishing grounds in the State. Viewed on a
clear spring day, this Island and its surroundings are
spectacularly beautiful with snow clad peaks, clear
streams and alpine lakes surrounded by blue sea waters.
I-
In the early 1900's large copper ore deposits
were discovered in the northwest portion of the Island.
A townsite was established which eventually served a
population of almost 4 thousand people. At its peak,
the Latouche townsite was a thriving community complete
with city-wide sewer, water and hydro -electric systems.
But by the early 1930's the copper mine closed and the
townsite slowly became a ghost town.
Since 1976 however, Latouche has experienced a
revival. Almost the entire townsite has been subdivided
and offered for sale. Many of the lots already have been
sold. Island developers also plan to construct a recrea-
tional lodge to accomodate visitors who want to spend
the night but can't live on their boats or don't want to
camp out. Other tourist facilities are on the drawing
board. I have been advised that property owners of Latouche
recently organized into community status.
It is anticipated that when the old townsites of
Latouche and Horseshoe Bay are developed, between 300 and
400 families will be living there at least for portions of
the year, plus a substantial transient surimer population.
Development of the adjacent Chuglach dative Corporation
lands could increase these estimates.
Critics of state construction of dock facilities on
Latouche Island primarily advance three arguments in op-
position to this project: The State is installing these
facilities in the wrong location - there are other areas
of the Sound better suited for this purpose; development
at Latouche would result in undesirable social and environ-
mental impacts; and a few have attacked the project as a
backroom deal designed to benefit the project developer,
and perhaps Ed Dankworth. A closer look at these arguments
should lead the reader to different conclusions.
" For those who ask "Why a boat harbor at Latouche Island;"
� the answer is that the Latouche townsite was established
50 years ago when it became the only privately owned
property of any size to develop in the Sound. Latouche
is growing again and is well on its way to becoming a
t recreational oasis in the Prince William Sound.
Under these circumstances the State has two choices.
We can ignore Latouche Island and let it turn into another
private country club for a few. Or we can take reasonable
steps to ensure that it develops as an environmentally
safe retreat for a majority of Alaskans. I argued for the
latter.
IPAI
�i
The original plan called for a developer to build
a private dock at the old Latouche townsite. I opposed
this project because I was afraid that if the public did
not control major access to the Island, the little guy
would be left out. The developer saw my point and agreed
to scrap his plans to construct private dock facilities.
Instead, I sought and received funding for a publicly
owned small boat harbor and ferry tie-up on the north -
end of the Island.
These public facilities will provide Railbelt Alaskans
the opportunity to more fully utilize the recreational
potential of the southwestern Prince William Sound. They
will make it easier for us to recreate and reside on one
of the most beautiful islands in the State. Folks tired of
waiting for boat space in Seward and Whittier will have an
alternative.
Boaters in general also will benefit since no fuel or
other service facilities are available in this portion of
j the Sound. This area is already popular for boaters from
Whittier, Seward, Homer, as well as for fishing vessels
based in Valdez, Cordova or other southcentral ports.
And these facilities will benefit a growing tourism
industry. There is great potential for Latouche given its
central location, proximity to the ferry system, natural
beauty and romantic past.
At a recent public hearing on recreational development
in Prince William Sound, individuals representing the Alaska
Railroad, State Parks, the Convention and V4.sitor's Bureau
and West Tours all agreed on the tremendous potential and
need for recreational and tourism facilities in Prince
William Sound. The Latouche facility will help fill that
need and of course provide employment in the process.
Unfortunately, similar arguments are cited by opponents
of the project who contend that it will result in undesirable
social and environmental impacts. Whenever you encourage
new development in an undeveloped area like Latouche
you will find individuals who either fear or resent the
change.
For those living in the area who resent development
of the Sound and Latouche Island, I must remind you that
growth will occur with or without my assistance. Besides,
the recreational resources of this State must be available
to all of our citizens, not just those who happen to get
there first.
-3-
For those who fear adverse environmental impacts,
I have tried to be sensitive to possible impacts by
encouraging growth in an already developed area. Planned
orderly development of a traditional anchorage like
Latouche centralizes development instead of encouraging
small enclaves and undesirable impacts throughout the
entire area.
In addition, I have proposed the construction of
a safe, clean renewable power source for the Island.
If the State doesn't step in, one of these days residents
will start hooking up their generators and hauling fuel.
We all know what happens to communities that must rely
primarily on an inefficient, piece -meal energy system
based on non-renewable resources. There is no good reason
for us to continue making the same mistakes.
During its copper mining days, Latouche was powered by
a hydro -electric facility on Wilson Creek. I proposed that
we upgrade the facility to provide clean, simple and efficient
electrical power sufficient to meet most of the commercial
and residential needs of the Island including the operation
of the small boat harbor. Front end costs would be repaid
to the State through assessment and user fees in a fairly
short period of time. Operations and maintenance costs
would be covered by a healthy monthly cash flow.
Although this project was not funded last session,
I will continue to work for its funding. I am convinced
small. hydro -projects such as the one on Latouche are
overwhelmingly in the State's best interest.
There are a few critics of this project who oppose any
development at any cost. When they can't win on the
merits they move on to attack personalities by suggesting
this is really a profit making scheme which will benefit
j me and/or my friends only. This allegation is false.
I do not own or lease land anywhere in Prince William
(' Sound including Latouche Island, I will not profit from
Latouche development, or any State sponsored projects
I have supported in Prince William Sound. At one time I
did plan to buy a lot on Latouche Island. However, I
decided not to invest to avoid any appearances of impro-
decidy.
--' Nor am I trying to help out a single private developer.
i Along with other leislators, I am trying to help out
' approximately 200,080 Alaskans who have a right to convenient
and affordable access to a fine recreational playground.
-4-
I
M
J�I
Like it or not Latouche is going to grow. As long as
the State maintains a hand in this project we can make sure
the Island is developed equitably and responsibly. Not
everyone can go to Hawaii for two weeks, but when Latouche
is developed we will have more Alaskans enjoying Alaska.
At the same time, the pristine beauty and remote aspects
of the area can be maintained by confining development to
those areas which already have been established.
And by developing an environmentally sensitive renewable
power supply we will nvoi.d one of the most perplexing
problems now facing so many of our small communities in
Alaska at no ultimate cost to the State.
Alaska's political leaders should continue to search
for new ways to open up Prince William Sound in an
environmentally safe manner. Dollar for dollar it's the
best investment going for recreational development for all
Alaskans.
-5-
1A
I
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION 82-03
G _s
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, JOINING
CORDOVA AND OTHERS IN PROTESTING THE STATE OF ALASKA AWARDING A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANT OF $3,000,000 FOR HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS
ON LATOUCHE ISLAND IN SOUTHWESTERN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND.
WHEREAS, the City of Cordova, Alaska, through their City Council
has passed a resolution apposing the capital improvement grant to
Latouche Island on the Eiounds it is a recreation area without
permanent residents, and
WHEREAS, requests for capital improvement projects for Port San
Juan on Evans Island have been denied where a permanent community
already exists and is in need of these services, and,
WHEREAS, the grant of $3,000,000 for harbor improvements and a
landing strip on Latouche Island appears not to be in the best
interest of the overall Prince William Sound community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the legislature at its next session
reconsider this capital improvement grant for improvements on
Latouche Island.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 6th day
of January, 1982.
VINCENT 0' REILLY•i -MAYOR
ATTEST: C
22:�VnZY/ I"
JPnet Whelan, City Clerk
CH2M
�_1EN I LL
c;tn};rnc�c�rs
Il,utrurs
VC011 musts
scientists
February 25, 1981
K12720.62
Mr. Keith Kornelis
Director of Public Works
City of Kenai
Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Dear Keith:
MAR
C310 OF Akkk
hQ1r r,,, . N4VP
Re: Septage Loading at the Sewage Treatment Plant
In response to your request of February 4, 1981, we offer the following
clarification regarding septage loading at the expanded sewage treatment
plant:
The new sewage treatment plant was desinned for an average
daily septage flow of 2,000 gallons per day. The strength
characteristics were based upon the study we completed in
August 1979 entitled, 'septage Disposal for the Kenai-Soldotna
Area.' The normal operation of the new plant will be for the
septage to be discharged on a fairly uniform basis to the aerobic
digester.
The selected design flow of 2,000 gallons per day of septage
was based upon the anticipated volume of septage generated
by resider.?s within the city limits of Kenai that are not con-
nected to the sewer system.
Further information regarding septage loading can be found in the report
previously referenced, the August 1979 design definition report, in the
design documents, and in the future operations and maintenance manual.
Please advise me if we can be of further assistance regarding this subject.
Sincerely,
V(�' W�1,F 414,
` Loren D. Leman, P.E.
bja:36:n
Anchoragt oOke
Denali Towers North, 2550 Denali Street, Sth Floor, Anchorage, Alaska 99S01907i27S.2551
■
CITY KENAI
G'j
P. O. SOX SSO KSNAI, MASKA HSI
TSIS/NONS 213 • 763S
January 26, 1982
Mr. Bob Martin
Department of Environmental Conservation
Pouch 0
Juneau, Alaska 99811
Dear Mr. Martin:
The Kenai City Council at its regular meeting on January 20, 1982
directed me to write a letter of protest against the permit for a
five year extension given to the Kenai Peninsula Borough for its
land fill operation in the City of Kenai. Council would not have
objected to a one year or possibly even an 18 month extension for
the Borough's land fill operation in order to give them time to
find a suitable area for the site they are now using.
The prime reason for the City's protest is the fact that the
Borough's land fill site is adjacent to a 450-acre site that the
City is extremely anxious to develop. It is some of the prime
developable land in the City of Kenai. It has been noted that
Vince O'Reilly, Mayor of the City of Kenai, during the hearing
process period made a request of your department to make the
extension as short as possible.
Any reconsideration on your part of the five year extension would
be greatly appreciated by the City of Kenai.
Sincerely,
;ra. J. ghton
City Nana or
S;JB/dc
cc: Honorable Stan Thompson, 14ayor
Kenai Peninsula Borough
.fir. Bob flint, DEC, Anchorage
v
CITY OF KENAI
„ Del edpjcd aj 4""
F. 0. •OK $60 KENAI, ALASKA 99611
TELIPHONE 2E9 • ME
February 12, 1982
TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager
FROM: Jack LaShot, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Sludge Disposal - Borough Landfill
As my -letter dated January 13 indicated, I have requested a
permanent disposal site for the sludge from our new Sewer
Treatment Plant from the Kenai Peninsula Borough. I am told
by the Borough Solid Wastes Engineer, Skip Bambard, that they
can now accommodate this sludge upon their order at the
Redoubt Landfill. However, the Borough Administration is now
expressing hesitation due to the following items:
1. -The letter to DEC from the City of Kenai protesting
the five-year extension of the Borough Landfill on
Redoubt Avenue.
2. The fact that the City of Kenai will not accept septage
from Borough residents outside the City limits.
The Borough has sent a letter to the City outlining these
concerns and some possible solutions. (This letter has not
yet been received in time for inclusion in the packet. It
will be delivered at the Council meeting.)
I must urge Council to consider this situation carefully as the
new Sewer Treatment Plant is producing sludge without a permanent
waste site secured.
JL/jet
,-0
J
CITY OF KENAI �f
F. O. SOX $80 KLNAI, Al ASKA 99611
TUIPHOME 2$3 • 7636
January 13, 1982
Honorable Stan Thompson
Mayor, Kenai Peninsula Borough
Box 850
Soldotna, Alaska 99669
Re: Sludge Disposal
Dear Mayor Thompson:
As the new City of Kenai Sewage Treatment Facility nears
completion, the need for a sludge disposal site has developed.
The design for the plant assumed that the dewatered sludge and
screenings could be accomodated at the Borough Landfill on
Forest Drive. In a phone conversation with Skip Bambard on
January 12, 1983, I was told that we could indeed dispose of
this material in the landfill; however, it may be spring before
a pit and fence can be constructed at the site.
In light of this, I must request a permanent disposal site at
the Forest Drive Landfill. The City appreciates this consideration
and would be very willing to help work out a temporary.solution
until a pit and fence can be constructed.
Your earliest response would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
01
.Jack LaShot
City Engineer
.JL/jet
cc: Skip Bambard
[1
a I
G -�
•� '�,: I PSG', �: i f i 4441
rc- rui:rr lot .01R2
City of Kenai
p.0, Boy: 11F0
F;enzi, Alaslea 99611
ATTN: Wr.. J. Brighton
City tanager
SUB.,ECT: Nenai rndfill
Dear ?,r, Brighton:
We are in receipt of a copy of your letter of January 26, 1982 to
Mr. Bob '-Iartin of the Alaska Dephrtnent of Environmental
Conservation. In your letter, you state,
"The F'enai City Council at its resu?ar meeting on January
20, 1982 directed me to write a letter of protest against
the permit _`or a five year extension given to the Kenai
Peninsula Borough for its landfill operation in the City of
Kenai. Council would not have objected to a one year or
possible even an 18 month extension for the Borough's
landfill operation in order to five then time to find a
suitable area for the site they are now using,"
You further state,
"It has been noted that Vince 0' Reilly, Xa�},rvor of. the City
-,de a request
of your department to make the extension as short as
possible."
On January 1-8, 1962, we received a letter fro-3 teem Citv
Engineer, :r. Jack LaShot, In it he rc.!Fuested permission to
disr^se of accurulating sluege being geno�,.?tr-c; at the City's
a Sewge Treatr..ent PIA -It. Tt is also (•06rfnt "ron the letter end
subsequent conversations with :,r. ?.a`':u1t that tl-e Cfty's propesed
dinpesal of at the Yenai t,�r,r" : 11 :.nulr' be c<�ntinuotis
ad infinitun. It a�pears that both the City End the Borough have
a-,;tual ; rch'_e^; t. at IS c:i: ;c::.al of :i;bte ir. a Ga`e and
CD'✓C'r,i ort . nne r. I :T, ,ure "vr-ryo is f s wh''e o t ie
tromendrusly expensive, t,matif,r.al' ;and t i;;e ccr:s :r^irg problem
N
r
'evolved in 1�1c0-ing or ;'eloca inY! :i t�? Dr'�:�1 tilt[ of Any ;c,.t.
We feel that the: ut i l i r..,t i on of the prr•s.c nt site for as 1, nr As
possible is in the best jr.-t&!•ests of the Ci t ,
-} , the Ro.ough ,.rd
I the to}:paver. ,Therr---fore, we offr--•' the �C+�i:'•wirf; !iS a y^^,C��jpjn
solution to our .,utual disposal probzer.
Since the Kenai Peninsula 37r`rluhh exerclres ?orough wide solid
taste powers, it follows that all Borough taxpayers share equally
in the financial support o; the- Roroi!ghrs lanr'fi??s. S:ibse-
gLcr.tly, the Boroug;l car, not allow r.',e ._`e of the landfill by 7,r,e
taxpayer or group of taxpayers to t1le cxcl,,son of other
taxpayers. The acceptance of sludge fron the'City of Kenai could
seemingly fall into this category in that taxpa.vr-rg not residing
in the City of Kenai would be ..i;jancial1v supporting the d<spcsal
of City sludge while not being Pl:o;;ed to dis ose of their c.4;n.
We feel, however, there --.ay be a way of adec;:ately addressing
this situation.
We are informed that the City's new sewage treatment plant is
capable of handling 2000 gallons of septa.ge per day or 730,000
gallons of septaee per year. Assuming that the average septic
tank is 1000 gallons and is pur..ped every three years, 2190 septic
tanks could be supported by the City's sewage treatment plant.
Since the City has an esti:.,ated 600 septic tanks, it follows that
an additional 1590 septic ranks could be serviced. We propose
that, if the City of Kenai will allow the disposal of septage
from areas outside the City, realizing that a priority usage
would be given to Kenai City septic tank owmers, the Kenai
Peninsula Borough would willingly receive and dispose of all of
the City's sludge at the Kenai Landfill. Naturally, the
concurrence of the Alaska Departnent of Conservation would be
required.
I am sure we can work together and resolve this problem,
therefore, please feel free to get with us so that we can reach
an equitable solution.
Sincerely,
lr,A*- �'7a4-y
Stan Thompson
Mayor
ST:pe
cc: Jack T..-Shot, City Engineer
Bob J•fartin, ADEC
Vince 0' Reilly, ;iayor-City of Kenai
q--1
IT IZY NI I I) IL AA PE A L IE S1Q A&T lid A IV 11)1P Alt 13 A IL
Throughout the Kenai Peninsula
Box 1413 e Soldotna, Alaska 99669 . 262-5822
January 26, 1082 1
!'/ l •:
William J. Brighton
City Manager
City of Kenai
P. 0. Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
K RE: Proposal for Reappraisal of 20 City owned Lots;.
Dear air. Brighton:
Please accept the following figure as my bid proposal for
the reappraisal of the 20 City owned lots identified in
your bid request. My bid for the appraisal of the property
on a group basis and in the same format that was provided
{ you for 42 lots March 9, 1981 is as follows:
TWELVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1, 200. 00 )
h
t� it is understood that the appraisal will be received -in the
City Manager's office not later than March 12, 1982 at 5:00
p.m.
y/ Thank you for including Fr;kholm Appraisal on your list of
prospective bidders. If you need any further assistance,
pl.(ra.;e do not: hesitate to call.
I r�'
Respectfully :submitted,
'.y FRYKIIOLM REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL
/4
Vernon �I.. '/Trylcfir)lm,' •'Jr.
4 's' Appraiser 1
VLF/t�jo
t
a
Phone
(907) 262.7444
;�d ,dial 54414 4#A149&4&
P.O. BOX 315
SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669
.. J a 1�82
BY CICITY Y.
'W41TR' TION
January 26, 1982
City of Kenai
P.O. Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Attn: Wm. Brighton
RE: Reappraisals of City of Kenai land
Dear Mr. Brighton:
Please accept my bid of $1, 900.00 as the total amount for
appraising the properties in question.
Thank you for the opportunity of being considered in the
bidding process.
Respe fully submitted.
Edwin S. Warfle, .R.A.
Appraiser
r1111IIIIIIII
a. nTf I FO
CITY OF KENAI
eapdw 4 4zad" 10,
F. O. SOX NO KENAI. ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 . 7536
February 11, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager 0
FROM: Dana Conley, Administrative Assistant`s
SUBJECT: Appraisal of Airport Lands
As you requested, please find attached a summary of the
appraisals that have taken place during the last 6 weeks.
I have included information about lots that surround the
subject lots, also.
For your further information, please note:
Lot 5, Block 2, Fidalgo is the lot directly across the
street from City gall.
Lots 1, 2 & 3, FBO have a lease application pending from
R & P Enterprises (Bob Roth & Dan Pitts).
Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, CIIAP are currently leased by Jack Estes.
Lot 1, Block 5, CIIAP is currently leased by Kenny Carver.
a
LOT
5, BLOCK 2 FIDALGO - Appraiser: Frykholm - $77,173.25 or $2.75 sq.f.,.
Appraiser: Warfle - $63,500.00 or $2.25 sq.ft.
Comparable
Information - Appraised January, 1980 by Frykholm
Lot
1, Block 2 - $30,200 or $1.35 sq. ft.
Lot
2, Block 2 - $23,400 or $1.25 sq. ft.
Lot
3, Block 2 - $24,600 or $1.25 sq. ft.
Lot
11, Block 2 - $37,200 or $1.35 sq. ft.
Lot
12, Block 2 - $22,700 or $1.25 sq. ft.
Lot
13, Block 2 - $39,900 or $1.35 sq. ft.
LOT
1, 2
& 3 FBO - Appraiser: Warfle - $68,600 or $1.75 sq. ft.
Comparable
Information - Appraised June, 1981 by Frykholm
Lot
1, FBO - $60,760 or $1.55 sq. ft.
Lot
2, FBO - $54,880 or $1.40 sq. ft.
Lot
3, FBO - $54,880 or $1.40 sq. ft.
LOT
2, BLOCK 1 CIIAP - Appraiser: Warfle - $56,045 or $2.50 sq. ft.
LOT
3, BLOCK 1 CIIAP - Appraiser: Warfle - $56,250 or $2.50 sq. ft.
Comparable
Information - Appraised June, 1977 by Frykholm
Lot
2, Block 1 - $22,417 - $1.00 sq. ft.
Lot
3, Block 1 - $22,500 - $1.00 sq. ft.
Lot
4, Block 1 - $22,500 - $1.00 sq. ft.
LOT
1, BLOCK 5 CIIAP - Appraiser: Warfle - $51,750 or $2.25 sq. ft.
Comparable
Information - Appraised February, 1981 by Frykholm
Lot
1, Block 5 - $29,898.70 - $1.30 sq. ft.
Lot
2, Block 5 - $25,935.00 - $1.30 sq. ft.
Lot
3, Block 5 - $25,935.00 - $1.30 sq. ft.
Lot
5, Block 5 - $29,250.00 - $1.30 sq. ft.
Now
/IV FV
1 CITY OF KENAI
�-lod Cap;lai
,
P. O. SOX 660 KENAI, ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 263 • 7636
February 12, 1982
`• MEMORAWDUM
TO: Mayor Vincent O'Reilly and Ken City Council
FROM: Jim Swalley, Airport Manage jam'
Attached is a copy of an article extracted from the
January edition of Airport Services Management magazine.
This article is appropriate to Kenai only in the fact
that it points out certain areas that are often and
very easily overlooked when considering an annual budget.
I found the article well written and informative, and hope
you enjoy it as much as I did.
JS/dc
- = cc: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager
Charles A. Brown, Finance Director
Attachment
a ' �
I
i
J
- - f
p
a
giving youir shopovit
an even bVesk"P
There is a good chance that your public
airport is in better financial shape
than your budget shows. You see, you may
not be getting credit for some revenue .. ,
by Frank Burnham impact studies commissioned by local
goves na►ents for their airports. Itepre•
'1^f f you manage or leatce an airport
owned by your local government,
chances are you're familiar with
the experience of 'tanding before the
city council or the county board of
supervigiom when budget time comes
around anti li•tVning to the politicos
plead poverty,
Then, in the local newspaper,
editorial writers and vociferous
authors of "letters to the editor" earn•
plain that their tax money is tieing
squandered for an airport which exists
for "sealthy piaybots to fly their
toes,"
What we have here is a popular
snetodrarna this! plays annually ►n cite
ies and counties throughout the coup•
try, as the airlsirt manager, whose
budget prujectinn% -how -,till more red
ink our the 12 snoaths- ahead, creeps
hat-m-hand up to the public till.
So far, so familiar.
But %hat utily •nine airport n1;$n•
:ogee --and virtually flip local newspa•
per voliturs or irate i ►t in-ns—realise is
th,st the figures the city is i•s to dieter•
mine the rust of running its ;Isrport
often fad in tell tilt, whale truth alsiut
tine facility', operation!- and Ile►.cilt.e..
One tsf the nation's larger airport
con-ulting firm, retently t:ahul:ated in,
formatiun Irons a niur►ler of ecanuinic
Frnalt Burnham is a Rif er,ide r A
howl free lance miation terrier
sentatives of the firm twhich preferred
to remain unidentified► told AS.if
their anal: sis showed that "very few"
of those studies credited the airlxart
with revenues accruing to the city/
county from nales taxes, taxes an un-
saaeur.•d personal property (aircraft),
and taxes paid on "possessory in•
terest." IThis last is paid by the lessee
tin airport facilities owned by the local
government. Such facilities normally
are considered tax-exempt unless they
are leased out for commercial or husi•
nwis purposes. lit inwo aura% where
the tax is levied, the rate is identical
to tl►e real property lax in that area.I
lit the m ajortty of rises, the firm
concludes, thence three stwrces of air•
part income are vanishing straight
►nto the general Imuk of liwal govern.
n►ents.
I'he impact of this bookkeeping
method tits the apl¢•arance of ass sir•
purl•ei budget varies•, of cuune, from
place to place, Hitt an %diss►e vswcoi- the
result, oier•dtting the mrfield Cur this
"hidden income" c.st► le stastiterng.
A case in point
Hi%ersitle is a Suuthern Citlitorina
comlu+lntty of olne 1 -10JI ► pa•rsonet.
lityer,sde Misitiripil Atrport 1- :a
n1c„b•rn Id4'111ty with own hard.-tstf7te
runwa%%, -its MS. an YAA ('Lass It
cuntroi t-naer, and a Tf-rinnal Volt
All oper,atsoua currenth are geacral•
26 AIRPORT SERVICESMANAtiEiAENT JntiturytptU
aviation oriented, the city haying np
certificated air currier or sc•hedulvd
collimuter service. The nearest facility
offering commercial airline is
30 mile', away,
In 1980 the airport recorelcol jim
over 200,000 operations, including
alinust :1.000 Instrument approaches.
Master planners forecast that b> 1990
annual operations will swell to more
than 300.000 a year and the ntsrnler of
locally haled aircraft (now 223) will
more than double,
Modest expansion is recommended
by the planners—$22 million worth
over the next 20 years, of which
federal and state funding should pro.
vide $1 i million.
Hut whether the city fathers will
accept and implement the master plan
is questionable, since normal taxpayer
resistance has been fueled by the
plan's forecast that the airport will
operate in the red by more than
S100,000 a year at least through 1985,
The way the city finance director
add., it up, that appears likely. U,ing
the most current figures, even airport
director Murray Bywater estsmates
the Ifw% for 1991 to ►e in the neighbor•
h(sid of $70.000, But all of the-e
figur-s are haled on the fad that the
airport dues not get credit for any
rd-%enues accruing to the city a. the
fewilt of rules tax, tax on unsecured
personal property, or tax tin posksso•
ry ►ntert.A.
For three tears an orgarstratltsn
working tin behalf cif the airlsort unit
general aviation interests in the
ltiver,ide urea —the Asrfsiirt Hop -tern,
a thandwr of commere ori•inita•
tints --Its- badgervd the city ithrsough
the airport contintsswn► for figures
reprvvntsng the -sr -oures of income.
The Hsiu-term .ay their reque-ts hate
(seen 1911ored.
0itltbucttng their own mdplamdtent
inye-tiv ation, the lt-io-ter- hayv c onie
up with what they fvel .Iry "relirbic, if
;c.gs^c,
r
lint totally aerurate" figure-4 uxttrae.
tow that m the t by well ins tt-
r« ::t::;.• the, re, n,n,lhlht: for I any
surd require anent nlu,t bc•."
c.1�e, rleltt%•r.cic•Iy nh.r the linen•
m ate
frothe ►tale some, $:,•i,nUn a% its
We'
We' 111— t live ked %tilt the otfee of
I lal (:ICI, about their airport. In Iona
%hart- lit the %Jlo. Ltx tin guod%%obl at
::cilul•rn y,
r a"". In fact, it appwar% to Ill. more ;t
"h11%mess
thv fir{,crt .Ind another 499,titM1 a%the
lit
('alifontta, a hairman of list, Aviation
matter of as usual." Tax
/tty's -hare of the per%or►.II pinps•rty
tax paid by the owner% of aircraft
yul%tl11""lttee of tilt- Hoare Cnnunit•
revenue, from maul:- different types of
public' enterpnxe% trarhtionaliv have
ha,ed at the airport and list, tax on
tee on Public' Works and Tr1n%portar
title,. aulrl.e 1. the s.rmcir l)e•nlnrrrtt
gone Intel the general fund and, no;
possessory ntiorcm lard lily 1.1 airport
tenants,
involved with framing the new AUAII
hr,ltie official% pee•Int nut, that %t-ll play
lc where they belong.
including four FlpO% and the
FAA. IA regional General Aviation
legislation.
blineta's %toff people agreed that it
talking
nhc/a e
District Office and ass A►rwav%
Facility Sector Mice are located ',,It
would not be,:lppropnate to Include In
alwttt11ha, { tiltntthe airport
fund and therefore has never been
Riverside.)
Adding these
the h•gi%l:)tlon any wording that
would require the applicant to provide
credsted to the, airport; it ps%t hasn't
occurred to the re%ptln%dde offirial•c
revenue% to
Ity'w•ater•s 1!IM1 a%ttnlate of $^lll,nnn
a pre fit•eI'd •loss ,t:tement.' The%
feel the prublc•In i% •entnething that
that this pr:o:tue cast% the atrp%,rt in
in direct operating revenues, we get a
total of $3
%hotllll he "corrrc'tly addressed at the
sit unreali%ticalty poor light. Witi-n it
is brought to their attention. they
• .1101). against a%ttnsated
operating costs of only S281,000 for
state level."
The congressman hise,self, however,
are willing to adjust their
the year —a surplus of $ts;p,n(tn. Yet.
using the ruy'% methodology
wa%criucal 'if local governments that
acrountnt►h
g pn,rvdures to reflect the
actual revenues developed from the
and not
counting the tax rryenue%. liywater
has to forecast a S;n,nnn loft%.
do not credit tax revenue% to the air•
tort generating them nor give the tax•
airport,
Mtl%t authorities with whom %e
The mister planners, leas
talMo agaut however, that such an
current stets%tics, forces%t a $10
adjustment probably would b e only on
In%.this year and snnilarin%tee%for the
i i for the
paper, and the money to que%pion will
next four years• As tar as the pul,lic is
concerned, and as officially
Hidden revonues turn
"loss"
continue to go into the general Lund
As long as your budget receives credit.
reported
fly the city through the bocci media,
a $70.000 Into
of course, your ►mmediate problem is
thhe airport ill costing them a signitI-
an $83,000 surplus.
soled, But if you actually want those
cant sum.
funds for airport use, you'll he in,
Since this dilemma afflicts net only
in a totally different hall
Riverside but many cities and coup-
game —one that will demand a lot of
ties across the Uri' ited States, and
since ma%t local governments look to
payer% an accurate picture of the air.
port's drain on or contribution to the
politicking,
Airport managers and those con•
W-"Tlbrlsgton tit provide 90'ci funding
public coffers.
cerned with the future well-being of
for airport projects through the Air.
-Local governments,'• he told
their airports should first do their
homework. Find
Port Development Aid Program
IADAP), we talked to the FAA. We de-
A.Stf. "should realise the value of
their airports, both in
out exactly what
revenues the airport produces. includ•
xcrib ed what appears to he a universal
problens and asked if them: was any
the local
government revenues which are gener•
ated at the airport }ecau%e
tog all tax revenue%, If it is net icing
ingallcredited with some of them, take the
thing the federal government could
(of ►hould) do to ensure that local
and of the
economic growth that an airport
makes possible in that community To
casetetactfullyme o the governing
the
agency. if that dot-%n't work, docu.
governments seeking AUAP grant%
pla$rd fair with the taxpayers.
ignore those revenue% and that ecfi•
Mint your position thoroughly, seek
4110 backing of influential civic group%•
in the first place, FAA spokesmen
noruic %tintulus when making local
decisions in a real disservice to that
and take the story directly to the tax.
sgreed that we had "accurately Ile.
%c•riled the situation." But there is lit.
community."
A nu»der of federal :old %t:►te 1eg•
payers through thv local medin.
()it" partial %ulutiun to the pnthlem
ion
is
tie the federal government c am do,
islators and other government o1fl•
offered fly .lame% {manager of
the Novato Municipal Airport in
they %:lid, Since ADAII is strictly a
"grant activity:" and the applicant'%
vials %av they agree with Mineta, but
we heard little in the way of %ugge•l-
Northern California, who persuaded
flrlanci;ll 1•ondti'lot 'Joe% ot bgure
tlon% about holy to get it' al go'
the Marin Countv comptrill tt•r to pre-
into the eltg{bltity criteria.Theens•
Kling legislation doe•% not require
--I
meats to sutt%c•ritc to what fine Official
termed "truth
Para {flfi,fnlJl yt•:Ifh' %tatenlc lit%>I l w.
ing the airport's "hidden" tax can.
a
profit and -lira% srntement front tire all-
a in finances" agree-
ntent--that i,, to ba tile• laxp•t�ers
trih+tions to rounty coffer%. The
rtinney
plirant• IA I'M, would require, of
course, that all revenue% generated
know exactly what it co%1% to run the
6-al airport
I, licit retrit,%ed 1W the airilt•ld.
but ,it least the %tatement gives Tarr
directly or indirectly i,y an airport Ile
and what list, field pro-
tore%in the form of revenues.
wlmedsing to -chow it) irate cittlens
who reel !us fur{Itiy
oho%n. ►
tw pie king their
"Since information reprehenu
What can you do?
pockets.
lit
In
the proLt loss situation at an sill{'
cant airport is not related to or re.
Nurse of this should loe taken to %ug•
at era %hen airport.—
ecially %mall to tnrdiuns•huvd gen.
ryuittd for n%:Irdtng a grant, we 1.1,uld
not request it." One ,px,ke•rrrin
ge%t that rill- guardian% of local
eral a%tatlun facilitle%—:art- feeling fi-
nan, jai pre..ure trom .111 quarter-, it
,ald.
"This w/tube Ile an unwarranted ►ntru-
government ,Iro»gt%,xe% :err in all
-ern, worflinhile to get the story
% J the atf:IlrA of ll,l" gc
inn Intl al govern-
went. Airports a%uaily are creatures
'Edao,9 not@- wr rYr.r, t,r. (O,Ir enY n/renrr
F-f t.•I.• l""In r.l«..n ee,Iret. .ml AUA1•
straight belwre» tb,,,e %hci are re.
•prin,d,le for managing these• airport*
elf state•: or state %ut,/ilvtnx,n•{ and that
m•m.•pruA,Il•I, «.r,hl, re-or,gHrr hr•.htrm. thu,
n «d..d
And tilt- Iaxpdyer, %flit 1on•Ider tbt•rt,
:In 411w:trf:lrltt•rl I,Ufllen. FM
AIRPORT SERVICESMM,AGEME►iT Ja ucipy 102 27
i
INFORMATIONAL DATA SHEET FOR ORD. 82-15
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTSs Unknown
CITIZENRY EFFECTS
Group Affected: Sales tax paycrs
Nature b Effect on Each GroupsBx exempting
retail sale of food products
gasoline and home heating oil
from Borough sales tax.
i INTRODUCING AUTHORITYs
Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly
Sys Fischer
1
i
1
f
.
i
r,
31J
j
n
_
t
p `
a
4•
t
t
Ivtrodticod try: Fischer ~
Date: Frh. 16, 1982
hearing: liar. 16, 1982
Vote:
Action:
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH
ORDINANCE 82-15
A14ENDING SECTION 5.16.090 OF THE BOROUGH CODE OF ORDINANCES TO
EXEMPT THE RETAII, SALE Or FOOD PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN CONSrJI•IPTIO*1
AND EXEMPTING PURCHASES OF GASOLINE AND 11CME HEATING OIL FROM
BOROUGH SALES TAX.
WHEREAS, the concept of a retail Gales tax has
traditionally been considered as an excise tax upon the sale of
tangible personal property at the retail level; and
WHEREAS, a sales tax on the purchases of food products for
human consumption creates an unreasonable burden upon the
taxpayers within the Borough, who are required to pay a tax on
their daily sustenance; and
WHEREAS, this tax burden falls with direct ir..pact upon the
resident taxpayers of the Borough because nonresident taxpayers
can easily avoid the sales tax by purchasing food products and
other items outside the Borough's boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the recent escalation in the retail vrices of
gasoline and home heating oil has seriously burdened consumers
and has imposed substantial hardships upon numerous Borough
residents; and
WHEPXAS, the Assembly finds that some form of relief to
consumers from the excessive prices of gasoline and home
heating oil is warranted;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIIIED EY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE. KENAI
PENINSULA BOROUGH:
Section I. That KPB 5.16.090 is amended by adding two new
subsections designated as (N) and (0) which read:
"5.16.090 -Exemptions.
(:1) The retail sale of food products for human con-
sursption. "Food products" include nilk and milk
products, cereals, breads, oleomargarine, meat and
:neat products, fish and fish products, eggs and egg
products, vegetables and vegetable products, fruit
and fruit products, spices and salt, sugar and sugar
products other than candy and confectionery, coffee
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Ordinance 82-15
Page 1 of 2 Pages
I' ,
J
and coffee substitutt±s, tea, cocoa and cocoa products
other than candy or confectionery.
"Food products" do not include alcoholic., malt c:
other liquors, sort drinks, sod,i:s, or hoc ,(--rages
arily dispersed at bars and soda fountair-, or Oi( tar••
supplements.
Tho exemption provided for in this aubr;oct ion do,
not ,apply (a) when the fc'--id oroduct3 are a.; pro. -
pared meals on or off the promises of the retai.._r or
(h) wh#.!n the pro0tv-tg are prepared roan:, furnish rr
served for consurp.jnn 1t table.-, chair,, -)r '•U::tt';..
or from trays, alasses, c"Lshes, ^,r other taiSlow4 irks
provided b,-• the retailer or (c) when the Food aroductr
are sold on a "take out" or 'etc, aro" ordr.- %ire': "I're
actually packaged or wrapper? :^d ra::nn `r ter rr-:,.••o�
of the retailer. .
(0) Sales of hone heating oi_ and zair,s aasoline,
excluding :•sarine and aviati- r.
Section 2. ':hat the Mavor is authorized to r-ffectuate
this ordinance, which takes effect cn July 1, 1982.
ENACTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI PENMSULA BCROUGH 01,
THIS DAY OF 1982.
ATTESTS
Borough Clark
John. C. Davis, Assembly President
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Ordinance 82-15
Page 2 of 2 Pages
�
r
I
W
.0 ..
KEINA►1 PENINSULA BOROUGH
p BOX 850 • SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 99669
104,Ss. PHONE 262.4441
I K.1Fo
STAN THOMPSON
MAYOR
February 5, 1982 c~
Ms. Betty Calhoon
Licensing Supervisor
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
201 East Ninth Avenue -
Anchorage, AK 99501
Dear Ms. Calhoon:
Enclosed please find a copy of Assembly Resolution 82-16, by
which the Assembly officially protested the reissuance of
certain liquor licenses located within the Kenai Peninsula
Borough, including within certain cities within the Borough.
Please note that the Borough drops any protest to the
reissuance of liquor licenses for Hope Liquor Store, Sunrise
Inn, Swill's, American Legion (Kenai) and Pioneer Bar (Seward).
Each of these licensees have paid all due and delinquent taxes
and no further basis for protest exists. In addition, the
Borough anticipates making arrangements for repayment with
other licensees but these have not yet been executed. Upon the
execution by the licensee of the necessary instrument providing
for repayment to the Borough of these delinquent taxes, then we
will inform you of that fact and will drop our protest in that
case.
In addition to the licensees named in Resolution 82-16, the
Borough also protests the reissuance of a liquor license for
Seawind, City of Soldotna. We recently received your notice of
the application for renewal of that liquor license and have
ascertained that the sum of $481.11 in sales taxes for the
March, 1981 quarter remains due and owing.
Please consider the following to be the Borough's formal
statement of charges regarding the protest of the licenses
named in Resolution 82-16. It should be understood that in
setting forth the statements of charges, the Borough is acting
as the agent for each of the involved cities.
Outside Cities:
1. Crown Point Trading Post - has failed to file
sales tax returns and make remittances for the
r
Ms. Betty Calhoon
February 5, 1982
Page 2
r-
second, third and fourth quarters of 1981 and
in an addition owes a balance of $41.69 upon
older quarters.
2. Pines Bar & Motel - the sum of $428.00 remains
due and outstanding upon a NFS check previously
sent to the Borough. In addition, no sales tax
filings have been made nor remittances received
for any of the quarters of 1981.
3. Cedars - no sales tax filings nor remittances
have been received for the second, third or
fourth quarters of 1981.
4. Clam Gulch Liquor Store - the Borough has not
received any sales tax returns nor remittances
for the last quarter of 1980, nor for any of the
four quarters of 1981.
5. Sunrise Inn - the sum of $207.78 remains as a
delinquent balance upon old sales tax quarters.
In addition, the Borough has not received any
sales tax returns nor remittances for the third
or fourth quarters of 1981.
r--
6. Wgin's Lodge - the Borough has received no sales
tax filings nor remittances for any of the
quarters of 1981.
7. Homestead Liquor Store - this licensee has
failed to even register for the collection of
sales taxes and we have received no current
sales tax quarterly returns nor remittances.
S. Summit Lake Lodge - this licensee has failed to
file any sales tax returns for the second, third
or fourth quarters of 1981 and has made no
remittances upon it.
City of Homer:
1. Turner's - this licensee owes the Borough,
approximately $4,000 in delinquent sales taxes.
The licensee has been sent a Promissory Note
providing for the installment repayment of these
amounts, but the executed note has not yet been
receive by the Borough. Upon receipt, the
Borough will drop its protest in this instance.
2. Lands End - this licensee has failed to file the
third and fourth quarters of 1981 and delinquent
sales taxes are estimated to exceed $17,000.
r
r'
"i
Ms. Betty Calhoon
February 5, 1982
Page 3
City of Kenai:
1. Harborview Restaurant - approximately $22,000 is
owed by this licensee in delinquent 1981 sales
taxes and the licensee has not yet executed
documents providing for repayment. Upon
execution of such documents, the Borough will
drop its protest.
2. Rainbow Aar - this licensee owes the Borough
approximately $16,750 in delinquent sales taxes
for 1980 and 1981. Further, the licensee has
breached the previous repayment agreement made
with the Borough for collection of these taxes.
The execution of that breached prior agreement
was the basis for the Borough's withdrawal of
its 1980 liquor license protest.
3. Sam Pan Restaurant - this licensee has failed to
file sales tax returns for several quarters of
1981 and has not made remittances upon same.
4. Peninsula Oilers - this licensee has failed to
file any sales tax returns, nor make any
' remittances for any quarters of 1981 and further
owes $365.29 as a prior balance upon old sales
tax quarters.
5. Kenai Joe's Club - this licensee has failed to
file sales tax returns nor make any remittances
for the second, third or fourth quarters of 1981
,v and approximately $6,000 is estimated to be due
and delinquent.
Your cooperation in this matter is very much appreciated and if
you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Yours very uly,
fry
Andrew R. Sarisky,
Boroug Attorney
By:
Joseph L. Kashi, Assistant
Borough Attorney
JLK:pam.
ccs Borough Clerk; Borough Finance Department; Homer City
Clerk; Kenai City Clerk; Seward City Clerk; Soldotna City
Clerk
.Y�
psi
�A
rrvrrrss�
Introduced by: Mayor at
Request of Borough Cl,,,rk
Date: January 19, 1982
vote: Unanimous
Action: Adopted
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH
RESOLUTION 82-16
(Substitute)
PROTESTING THE RENEWAL OF CERTAIN LIQUOR LICENSES FOR
NONPAY14ENT OF TAXES.
WHEREAS, Title 4 of the Alaska Statutes provides that a
municipality may protest the renewal or transfer of a liquor
license until the licensee has paid all due and delinquent
taxes; and
WHEREAS, certain licensees have failed to pay delinquent
sales taxes, real property taxes or personal property taxes;
and
WHEREAS, the Assembly desires to protest the reissuance
of these liquor licenses until such time as all due and
delinquent taxes have been paid in full.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH:
Section 1. That the Assembly protests the renewal or
reissuance of the following liquor licenses:
Outside Cities:
Crown Point Trading Post
Pines Bar and Motel
Cedars
Clam Gulch Liquor Store
Hope Liquor Store
Sunrise Inn
Gwin's Lodge
Homestead Liquor Store
Summit Lake Lodge
Swill's
City of Homer:
Turner's
Land's End
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Resolution 82-16
Page 1 of 2 Pages
a
City of Kenai:
Sarbor-ie! Restaurant
Sam Pan
American Legion
Rainbow Bar
Kenai Joe's Club
Peninsula Oilers
City of Seward:
Pioneer Bar
Section 2. That the Clerk shall serve copies of this
Resolution Lyon The Honorable Patrick Sharrock, Executive
Director, State of Alaska, Alcohol a Beverage Control Board
and upon the Clerk of each respective city.
Section 3. That this Resolution takes effect
-fined ateiy upon its adoption.
ADOPTED BY THE ASSMIBLY OF THE EENAI P..1' ` &, SULA BOROUGH
ON THIS 19th DAY OF January 1982.
ohn Davis, rszeroiv Presiaenr
Donald L. McCloud, Vice Pres.
FITTEST:
sougn C.Lerlc
Ir
u I
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Resolution 82-i6
Page 2 of 2 Pages
d
CITY OF
KENAI
FOR COUNCIL
INFOMMATION
Transfers of
Funds under $1,000
under KPIC
7.25.020 (a)
Any Special
Date Dept.
Amount
From To
Explanation
2/5/82 Rec.
$500.00
4531 4533
2/5/82 Rec.
$900.00
2022 4538
*Unless some special explanation is filled in, the reason for
--- necessity or desirability of the transfer can be assumed to be
due to the normal condition that expense estimates during the
budget process were over estimated in one or more accounts and
under estimated in one or more accounts.
CITY OF KENAI
AD` ENISTILWIVE BUDGET TP;%::SFER
(Mv not exceed $999.99)
Date: 2-5-82
Fund/Department: Recreation
Transfer from: Account Amount
01-4501-2022 $ 900.00
Transfer to: 01-45010-4538 900.00
Justification of need for additional monies in account(s) transferred to:
Carpet cleaning and other repair work will be needed
before the year's end.
Explanation of why excess fund:: exist in account(:;) tran ferred from:
Excess funds exist in operating budget.
i
Ruquested by Department Head: 4
Approved by Finance as to availability of unencumbered bavj,�ces:
Approved by City manar. or C. lork or Cit, Attorney if in their
Department.,):
Transfer No. (supplied by Finance): T-r'Y_ - �.
r
i
CITY OF KENAI
AD` INI5TR.ITIVE BUDGET TfANWER
(May not exceed $999.99)
Date: 2-5-82
Fund/Department: Recreation
Transfer from: Account Amount
01-45020-4531 $500.00
Transfer to: 01-45010-4533 250.00
01-45020-4533 250.00
Justification of need for additional monies in account(s) transferred to:
Additional travel as a member of the Alaska State Parks
and Recreation Board.
Explanation of why excess funds exist in account(s) transferred from:
Park planning originally budgeted for will be done at no
cost.
Requ. mcd by Depart:ent Head:
i
Approved by Finance a3 to availabilit} of unencumbered b/ances:
Approved by City ..ana,cr (o city rk or City Attorney if in their
Department::): bbr �,.
Transfer No. (supplied by Finance): T-r'Y
r
/'Yr_0
carmen vincent gintoli, a- chi eci•
box 4625 professional building suite 110
kenai, alaslca 99611
907 283.7732
Fobru�)ry ;, 111P,'
City of Kenai
Post Office Box 500
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Attention Mr. WiIIiam Brin_hton
City :tanager
PE: Kenai !Municipal aircort Terminal Rr:nov-�tion:
lnvilce for Architectural Service
• INVOICE
Schematic Design Service per amended agreement:
r
Invoice amount a11ot•,a51e $28,537.50
•Previously billed applicable to this,nhase 11,000.00
Billable amount $17,537.50
Additional Services for Schematic S 7,900.00
Tbta l . Due $ 7,900.00
THf'JK YOu
i
1.*JS F>wf MBIAT* COY = -sV.Gi SE��
Poo. •AM Lt1 Or=> , ==zmpwrc �: -�4,-' 7
y"�,!•� 1►rnni •.tiuLtutvta 1��� .
r
i! �uttrvt s lit•�utttrt•.uu1 (:riavtl( t
Feb rulry 5, 11)fi2
Dept. of Comunity h I:e4ional Affairs
225 Cordova, BJd;;, B
Anchoruze, Ak. 995U1
Attn: Day Care Assistant Program
Mello:
Enclosed you will find the paperwork for .January DCAP
reimbercemert, totaling OK
This amount should be forwarded to the City of I:estai,
r
City of Kenai
Box 590
Kenai, Ak. 99611-0580
Attn: Charles Braun
Thanking you,
toncy f�. mstra f�-- S 40- w,; // r 'i l 7-4Te 74,0
DCAP person
.f
HK/nk C`
cc: City of Kenai
J
.< I
I
f
1 ,
/ y
y
I
I
N 9
Xznai Co„:„zutzit y _fAiaz y
A PUDUC LIONANY IN URVICE 81NCE 1949
BOX 157
KENA1, ALASKA 99611
REPORT FOR FY 1980-81
Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books
Fiction 15861 538R 12170
Non-fiction 18710 1679 3030
Total Book Circulation
56838
Films, Phonodiscs, Pamphlets, Periodicals, AV
5846
Total Circulation
62684
Additions Adult Juvenile Easy Books AV
1885 142 320 245
Total Additions 2592
Microfiche 9331"
Remedial and Re -worked Books Adult Juvenile Easy Books
AV Total
776 59 214
103 1152
Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned
Books 527 490 46o
AV 536 322 302
Microfilm 104 69 75
Interlibrary Loans by Our Library 983
Volunteers
Number 25
Total hours 3819
Income
Fines and Sale Books 5456.42
Lost or Damaged Books 795.48
Xerox 2020.95
Donations 1363.50
Miscellaneous 9,25
Total Income for FY 1980-81 $9645.60
XF,11'ai C..'o1111111l12ittJ .L[fWILY
A PUBLIC LIBRARY IN SLRVICL 61NCr. 1949
SOX 157
KENAI. ALASKA 95611
i
Borrower's Cards Issued
,1980-81
Kenai
1255 '
North Kenai
421
Soldotna
Kasilof
53
Hope
3
Sterling
39
Ninilchik
10
Homer
5
Clam Gulch
15
Anchor Point
3
Seward
2
I
Cooper Landing
2
_
Other
5
Total cards issued
2268
i�
Kenai
1255
Non -Kenai
1013
61,
�e
S.
I
f
y f
A,
1
'
t
9
i
1 XE,ai 4forninund y Yie7aLy
- A PUBLIC LIBNARY IN SERVICE SINCE 1949
1j SOX 157
KENAI, ALASKA 99611
1
REPORT FROM JULY THROUGH DECEMBER 1981
Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books
Fiction 8885 2833 6573
Non-fiction 9559 831 1440
Total Book Circulation
30121
Films, Phonodiscs, Pamphlets, Periodicals
3415
Total Circulation
33536
Additions Adult Juvenile Easy Books AV
Total
Gifts 346 17 18 40
421
Purchases 512 51 79 24
666
Total Additions 1087
,- Remedial and Re -worked Books Adult Juvenile
Easy Books AV Total
437 22
19 33 511
Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned
Books 255 164
158
AV 174 194
163
Interlibrary Loans by Our Library
398
i
Volunteers
Number 28
} Total Hours 2957
is
r;
Income
" Fines and Sale Books 2895.76
Lost or Damaged Books 652.60
Xerox 877.75
�i Donations 1695.60
`-- " Donations to Acct. 4534 7.75
- Aefutid to Acct. 8066 30.84
—_ Total Income 616o.30
v
Library Cards Issues from July through December 1981
Kenai 568
North Kenai 151
Soldotna 270
Sterling 26
Kasilof 28
Clam Gulch 15
Wildwood 1
Ninilchik 8
Homer 5
Tyonek 2
Cooper Landing 3
Anchorage
Fairbanks 1
Total Cards Issued 1083
DONATED MA` ERLi- L6
Ac.;,rUAL1.Y 8tm- Lvl,u
1980-1981
n
M. Ahlforu
10.00
Cranat on
I
R. Adana
10.00
Crcozwell
Alaska. Dept. of Fish Game
7.00
way, George
Alaska Fireplace
9.95
Ilykntra, Nettie
Alaska Historical Corimisnion
2.00
Early, John
•
Alaska Native Language Center
10.00
Eastman
Alaska Comm. on Post Sec. Edue.
13.00
Edgren, Al
Alaska Pacific University
4.95
Educational Communications
Alaska State Library
9-353.84
Ernst
Alaska, University of
30.00
Esping
Armstrong, Mary
322.15
Evans, Cheryl
Banks, Iola
5.00
Evans, Inez
Beaudrey, Sharon
31.95
Fvans, Pets
Bell & Howell
2.00
Everman, D.
Boarding Schools
2.00
Exxon
Burch
36.80
Fling, Jim
Calvert
22.50
Franklin, TWila
Bielefeld, Norma
51.95
Friends of the Library
r
Brown, Janet
19.90
Gotebchuet
Brown, Ruth
24.45
Granath, William
"'.
Chapman
31.90
Graves, .James & Alice
t <;
Chittenden, Cecil
151.64
Fiackn-y, Howard
Christian, Michael
31.90
Flagon, J.
Clausen, Ethel
61.35
Hall, J.
- -
Cohoe Library
75.70
Halstead
Cole, John
4.95
Hammond, Jane
--.
n
.1.7 5.35
97.30
12.95
52.71
17.85
8.95
71.75
19.95
10.00
12.93
8.95
62.00
13.00
49.70
15.00
150.00
66.55
81.90
2.50
50.00
34G.18
9.00
8.95
26.94
33.52
10.00
■
M
.
DonnLions 1980
- 1981 page 2.
lianke, Kathryn
33.85
Kipp, Clarice
30.75
Hanson, Mary
27.90
Knackstedt, Dan
206.80
Haviland
1.28
Kovac, Mark
14.95
Haydon, Christi
26.25
Labreque, A.
3.95
Hayes, Beverly
80.70
Laitilin, Kate
13.95
Henderson, Steven
3.95
Lancashire, R.
7.95
Hendricks
17.50
Langston, Faith
11.75
Herrin, Nancy
64.85
Laurie, Keith
18.90
Hidalgo, Kay
8.00
Long, T.
58.95
Hille, Carl
248.78
Lattereell
35.00
Homer Library
32.80
Mccomsey
19.20
Hughes
10.95
McCarten
15.00
Honolulu Publishing
12.95
McGann
16.20
Humanities Forum
3.00
McNair, Linda
5.00
Hursh, Ruth
86.80
Mallory
5.95
Jenny
136.45
Massie, Cliff
1.00
Kesilof Library
132.45
Monfor, Chris
14.95
Keen, Marlene
8.95
Mohn, Kari
24.45
Kenai, City of
199.50
Moody Institute
3.95
Kenai Chamber of Commerce
4.95
Morning, Mindy
9.45
Kenai Historical Society
10.00
Muller, J.
8.00
Kenai Junior High School
8.45
Woio, Dee
37.19
Kenai Peninsula Borough
10.00
Murphy, Linda
12.90
Kenai Peninsula Borough School
Dist. 13.00
Murphy, Ruth
8.95
Kenai Peninsula Community College 180.10
:Jat'l. Marine Fivheries
284.40
National Parks & Recreation
Neel, Cliff & Jeanette
Neilson
Nugent, Candy
O'Connor
Old Library Collection
Olmstead
Oregon State University
Oskolkoff
Parsons, Ruth
Perkins, Janette
Petrov, Janet
Power, Abby
Putnam, Susan
Rockefeller Foundation
Ramsey, Dave
Republic South Africa
Rice, Billy
Roberts, L.E.
Rodale Press
Samtur
Seattle Public Library
Selanoff, P.
Shaw, Dorothy
Sheppard
Sherman, Betty
J Shirnberg, Laura
Donations 1980 - 1981 page 3
4.95
Smalley, Sue
12.90
lo6.05
Smith, B.
10.90
MOO
Soldotna High School
128.74
17.95
Special Services
5.00
161.25
Stallard
3.95
135.57
Stanford, Frida
10.00
5.95
Arthur
12.95
2.50
Senator Ted Stevens
11.35
30.4o
Stiles
3;99
114.70
Stinnett, Gina
2.95
12.95
Stock
8.00
27.37
Strahman
15.90
9.95
Thibodeau
7.95
28.50
Todd Communications
5.00
229.35
Totem Tracers
397.90
294.49
Trustees
10.00
25.00
Turner
69.40
199.45
Tweedy
63.12
6.95
U.S. Government. Dept. Int.
5.00
3.00
U.S. Government. Treasury Dept.16.00
6.95
U.S. Water Resources Council
3.00
30.00
University of Alaska
12.00
24.85
Urantia
34.00
5.95
Van Baggen
15.00
8.95
Wagoner, Tom & Dorothy
124.15
12.95
Walker, Amanda
15.00
81.95
Weaver
5.95
. _ _" 44�i.
Donr%tionn 1980 - 1981 page 4
Wells
71.75
West
233.85
Western Islands
15.95
Wise
8.95
Wiese
70.30
Williamson, Thos.
99.50
Wilson, R.
6.95
Woods
15.50
Yamamoto
26.40
Zimmerman
16.90
Anonymous Donors
214.70
Anonymous Donor
5972.80
Bailie, Neel, Graves
80.00
& DeForest
Neel, Graves & DeForest
73.15
Gale Research
20.00
r
A PUBLIC WnRARY IN Ii!RVICE +SINCE 1949
BOX 157
KENAI. AL.ASKA 99611
REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF January, 1982
Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books
Fiction 1298 241 852
Non-fiction 1721 110 163
Total Book Circulation
4385
Films, Phonodises, Pamphlets, Periodicals
588
Total Circulation
4973
Additions Adult Juvenile Easy Books
14P Total
Gifts 54 3
6 63
Purchases 78 4 14
96
Total Additions 159
Remedial and Re -worked Books Adult Juvenile
Easy Books AV Total
35 3
4 4 46
Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned
Books 38 26 13
AV 25 20 30
Interlibrary Loans by Our Library 82
Volunteers
Number 22
Total Hours 388
Income
Fines and Zale Books 262.93
Lost or Damaged Books 80.38
Xerox 156.75
Donations 359.21
Total Income for January 859.27
Library Cardo Ystuued January, 1982
Kenai 186
Soldotna 46
North Kenai 41
Kasilof 5
Wildwood 6
Clam Gulch 4
Sterling 5
Anchorage 1
Nikiski 1
Total Cards I;wued 295
e _
1
trr
i
Y .
1! PV
•�- ,i.. �; ..ij.�t. ., ....t•YI� •r•....f.•n*►L'r•.•1l"Pf•'""�slt;^'� ti �a!*'"•LiDi lrr!'^:J.�.S." • r.
"•' ' :Yrrr l• • ¢.,.,;�' .;r ; •. .�tr•, � r t `. fir••. . r ,
.�� �l l.. �r lr-". :,Jt , .i •..,,,dlilr�t:.•: ... 1 .�j.,7�,yryrfl.,.�tJ �1,r+pj •���1 �4" (i�'�%.�r ✓:;f•
•.h r•,t. Y .� ' .yy • 1:.. * .r.ir�ira.w�l ��''/ ' &4 A0 4 Y •J•�Ji^
.i 3 .� Yf� •i �1 11
• • i+bv..:s:t.�ew:r&?!t%Ma•c::wrrLs.rh�.i.•a:wrllr:n«iJ.i+..../dIgtrC..sw,ca.r..A.rttr.L�r onupr /rPtaq lr �M ryrlt 9�lett awtIs4. �.�,. Inc. atwiwWOW— t etD ' f
,i Ms•d
t.� .Ni4a+iillrl:s/_�irr' wl,ld.+s:;:.
t•rr
u is
1400
uro
n to
u»
aoo
u rs
,too
U is
t+ n
+t go
nos
++m
for$
as
an
law
[.n
O
[n
soo
[n
$10
[ is
[go
i is
�ttlifTiTlttiffttrl r It f r r f, t t f t; r f T, I t t l+ f I T1 'I rj 7r^ f... + •I.'.: Irrf
fauruery
dillf
ITT
Tr
[:•+'.
S. 1962
Tht Bond Buyer's nl
1 lex 'or ;,J.
stabilized this weak at 13.1?, with � '�{ '"" "�•—jam
the Reven:le ir,fr. rclatf•r•;•
�. 14.0?1, The raunicipil ,iar!•"t 1%..
Cc!taracterized by a very staep yield
c-irve oet•leen short and loi•I-tirm ~�--•-- — - - -
-
F: rates making it advantageous to do
borrowing on a seorter oasts +ls
possible.
Tax-exempt interest rats. near tneir
all-time high. are attracting enoughi,
investment funds !j accx-x+date t'+e
borrowers wno must coma, to market at
these high levels. Timiny of boni
issuance continues to be a critical 1
factor in any borrowing strategy. I
i Fi_��
f iy �' I i j i•�T i
I
1
1
f
I
OA�LONO
ulosx
,
J
I
I
I
OONO
RUY
R'S
INgrx
OF !#UNICIPAL
INTEREST
RATES
_
I
1I
li
Ifrl
11{
f{11 .I11
1L lJll!
Ill.lu
1111
1J 113J1
ll.li
f.
111.: ul
111
11
I111
111
111
llll
.a
is t*
714n
u o0
tin
tl A
t; s
+too
+J ib
't •A
+t n
tt:1
tt Oil
+Uf
+top
to to
logo
IDA
loco
s.is
[go
s:s
too
[n
ago
to
[co
i is
•M1 ..t 4t0 'If mitG ..r IH YY /M rr1 .rr Nt ..rr
..__it,MO" •..-�-'-__�!�
'r
,Ir Kt jV 'f.O ..r rt• rY Irr t11f ,vr
itllt ------
'-'— -r_-
tl..^•Mr•Nro.Yt
tlY•tNM�I0.1 Mu"oCiPAL r•rNM;l 04PAM110I011 —
A C t'.•rwy, JI.H. YtY tlr.PlMt
• OM
Of Q., 0." ," of •.. W,'Pr IMrWM[ rrYKN
YYw,tpr r MMN OrpM•.MI
1��
•rt.
LEAtfIE ..4. . ,r r.^ • r •.^ .•vi ww .v r.,n
rWY _ 'IM.I.w rrM .. ;AI= .�•.�..r
�ru �.� r•
i�. •
.,..,•rr • .,�r11.IM i i� •�
•..
�•i�� t`r ;�.,,.�rr. � .�•w
rMr,7..
•
. • • •,MA.
Y.- • r
•
••�I
• ��.�.•
r�r
.Rw •
Yr.y�l.y � �
•r`�*N
1•
� r ✓e1A'�
• �
�,
•��M/ir N •� •
�-r
y ,�r�.... Y W�'r
� �
•�
M
tm~
it �rrryr, ':�.�.r��r�
•
,n•r.
,. ram.
i,.w ro r•. �~:'.
--C
1:t�i o
4p,rat/le(
KENAI PLANNIN GAND ZONING COliMISSION
Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982
Philip Bryson, Chairman
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Phil Bryson. Jack Castimore, Jim Blanning, Wayne Regelin,
Lee Lewis, Miry Quesnel, Paul Turner, and Ex-Officio Member
Betty Glick.
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Alaska 1984
A Council resolution No. 81-13 requested the Planning and Zoning
Commission review and make recommendations concerning the observance
of the year.
Chairman Bryson opened the meeting to the public for comment. Hearing
none, the issue was brought back to the Commission, with Mayor O'Reilly
making the opening comments.
Mayor O'Reilly informed the Commission that a representative from the
Alaska '84 Committee had appeared before the Council which resulted
in the resolution. $2.000 has been appropriated to Kenai and a
deadline has been set for March 1 for a plan to be presented to the
State legislature and in order to meet that time line, the community
will have their plans ready by February 16th. The Council and Mayor
are asking the Commission to consider the matter and determine if
the plans should go ahead and if so, what direction the plans should
take.
Jim Blanning asked if any imput had come from the Chamber or Senior
Citizens, Mr. O'Reilly answered that there was not. What input that
has been received has ranged from thinking Alaska '84 is a good idea
to "the Alaska '84 Committe is not approaching it in the right way,
too much money is being spent".
Betty Glick commented on celebrations in the past including an idea
of a pageant or exposition depicting past history. Wayne Regelin
suggested tieing it in with Fourth of July celebration in the summer
and staying divorced from Alaska '84, doubting that money will really
be forthcoming from Juneau.
Jack Castimore used Sitka as an example of celebrations where that
City had a summer art festival with local artists displaying their
works, music, Russian dancers. and tours of local interests. Kenai
could have much the same thing with tours of the oil industries, and
using; Kanai's own youngsters as guides, have places such as the
Russian church set up their own displays depicting; Kenai's past, with
each place on the route includin4 their own pictures or items of
inserest utilizing; videos acquired from such places as the college
or high school.
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 2
Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982
Paul Turner expressed the opinion that all mentioned were good ideas,
and that a task force would be necessary to implemPrr nny further
objectives, however, pointed out that he was opposed to spending an
amount such as four million when that amount could well be used in
different, much needed areas. The entire Mental Health budget for
a year is four million. However, if Kenai doesn't use the money,
Anchorage will.
MOTION:
Wayne Regelin moved, seconded by Paul Turner to table the issue of
Alaska '84 until later in the meeting.
Motion passed unanimously.
4. AGENDA APPROVAL
MOTION: ,
Moved by Paul Turner, seconded by Jack Castimore to approve the agenda
without correction or change.
Motion passed unanimously.
C 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 13, 1982.
Phil Bryson asked that on page 3 under reconsideration of Swires
Subdivision, the vote be shown and on page 3 paragraph 4, the word
'water' be deleted to clarify the intent of the statement.
MOTION.
Paul Turner moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to approve the minutes
with the corrections and changes.
Motion passed unanimously.
6. OLD BUSINESS
A. Lease Application: R & P Enterprises, Lots 1, 2, and 3 of FBO
Subdivision
Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts had been asked by the Commission at the last
meeting to draw up a written plan that would outline the phases and
dates of expected completion, these were submitted in writing to the
Commission.
a
i .
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMT SSLON Page 3
Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982
i Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts explained their written proposal and asked
for questions/input. Mr. Swalley, airport manager did not have
{� any comments other than the application with the additions met with
R his approval.
The Commission asked Mr. Pitts and Mr. Roth if the financing still
appeared to be available; the answer was yes. Mr. Turner asked if
they were planning to haul freight also, the answer was yes, they
had their own planes for this. Mr. Bryson and Mr. Turner voiced
their concern regarding landscaping and since there was supposed
to be chain link fencing up, it was decided between the Commission
and Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts that trees would be left along the Willow
frontage outside the fence.
MOTION:
Wayne Regelin moved, seconded by Paul Turner to approve the lease
agreement to R b P Enterprises, FBO Subdivision, lots 1, 2, and 3
and that the development plan be made part of the lease agreement
and that by May 1982, tree removal and site preparation must be
significantly underway, completed by October 1982.
�. Motion passed unanimously.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Request for lease modification from Chris Stoehner/Arctic Aviation
John Stoehner of Arctic Aviation appeared before the Commission on
behalf of Chris Stoehner. Mr. Bryson asked Mr. Stoehner to briefly
explain to the Commission what his application entailed, which is
the combination of clam processing and machine repair and overhaul
r ,
service.
Commissioners asked Mr. Stoehner if any provisions have been made
regarding the clam processing, he answered that traps had been proposed
for the sewer lines and that 6,000 gallons of water during an 8 hour
period would be flowing through the lines. Phil Bryson asked Mr.
Stoehner how many people were employed in the processing business.
t Mr. Stoehner answered that there were over 200 with 50 being located
at the cannery.
' Jim Blanning asked if the FBO lots were restricted to aircraft use only,
if they were not FAA controlled, Jim Swalley answered that they were.
Mr. Stoehner pointed out that transporting the clams would be done by
s..
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 4
i �• Regular Meeting, Janua;:y 27, 1982
airplane, specifically Arctic Aviation planes and later by other
airlines.
Phil Bryson asked Mr. LaShot, City Engineer for input on the issue.
system is not eared for an type
Mr. LaShot felt that the new sewer y g y yp
of processing facility and went on to state that he had talked to
Chris Stoehner who stated she was looking into getting some documentation
that would prove it not harmful, however, Mr. LaShot had talked with
a representative from D.E.C. who said if properly screened and maintained
it may not be too much of a problem and felt that more research needed
to be done on it.
Wayne Regelin asked Attorney Delahay for his opinion, asking specifically
if this operation would be illegal. Mr. Delahay answered that he didn't
believe it was, however, stated that there were a number of reasons why
he could not recommend it, 1) it is not an airport related activity,
the fact that the clams are transported in and out is not a controlling
factor, 2) the machine shop since it would be working on airplane engines
would be airport related and should be encouraged if in fact, it is
not available in Alaska, and the Commission must closely look at the
fact that it would be antagonistic towards the FAA and the Council who
have tried to hold the properties on the airport for airport facilities
only, and 3) the attorney's office has found Arctic Aviation to be
uncooperative, unresponsive, and irresponsible in the conduct of two
of the leases they currently have, and went on to explain the details.
JiWhe
nnin stated that his feelings were that with the FBO restrictions
CviA1 L1� woonclu a approval of the clam processing plant and in addition
f tapparent unresolved problems with the City he would have problems
approving the application.
MOTION:
I
' Wayne Regelin moved to approve the lease modification application of
Arctic Aviation for a clam processing and machine shop facility,
seconded by Paul Turner.
Phil Bryson asked that"some consideration be given to a motion not
allowing the clam processing but allowing the engine overhaul shop".
tj' Wayne Regelin stated that he would look favorably on an engine overhaul
L shop once an agreement was made with the City. Jack Castimore also
- -- went along with this.
i
John Stoehner stated that the viable business would be more the clam
processing than the machine shop and should the clam processing proposal
fails, then he would have to withdraw his petition.
3:
VOTE:
I
Motion failed by unanimous roll call vote
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 5
r Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982
MOTION:
Jim Blanning moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to remove Alaska '84
from the previous tabled motion and bring it back before the Commission.
Motion p•.ssed unan.'mously.
Paul Turner introduced Resolution No. PZ82-1 which recommends participation
! in the celebration and requests the Mayor appoint a task force foc
( planning.
MOTION:
Paul Turner moved to adopt Resolution PZ82-1, seconded by Jim Blanning
i MOTION Amendment:
Wayne Regelin moved to strike item C from the resolution.
Motion failed for lack of second
I
Phil Bryson asked to go on record as saying "I feel the City is being
( (, thrown crumbs to get general support throughout the State and though
I do not approve of the concept either, I also don't approve of their
per capita percentage of the project proposed for planning in the area".
VOTE on original motion:
r
Motion passed with Commissioners Quesnel, Castimore, Lewis, Blanning
and Turner voting yes; Commissioners Bryson and Regelin voting no.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. City Council Report: Betty Glick
w;l The City Council passed a resolution which awarded a contract to complete
a topo project.
{` Carmen Gintoli submitted a redesign or update on the airport schematic
l The Council passed motion to purchase back the leases from Bob Roper,
on recommendation from the Harbor Commission, and Mr. Roper accepted
the offer.
1
J.
f,.
W�
i
19
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting, January 27. 1982
Page 6
B. Borough Planning Report: Betty Glick
For information, a presentation was made by David Stevens from Alaska
Division of Parks on Kenai River Master Plan.
Swires Subdivision rezoning was approved.
Kenai ordinance 81-L2 section 21.01.010 paragraph B had been recommended
for deletion by the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Sam Best
felt that it would be best to leave that wording as stated due to his
interpretation being if the Borough was proposing; to site a new school
and they had chosen an area that did not allow schools then the Borough
would have to petition the cities to rezone and go through the process.
Added: "subject to review and recommendations by the affected munici-
pality and be consistent with land use."
C. City Administration Report: Bill Brighton
The Borough was granted a five year extension for their land fill project
in section 36 and at the direction of the Council the Cite has protested
that extension and asked for consideration from the Department of
Environmental Conservation.
8. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
None
9. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Wayne Regelin asked if The Russian Church had obtained their building
permit and if there had been any followup on the letters Mr. Brighton
had sent out. Mr. Brighton stated that he had not as yet, however,
there would probably be court action pending. A report will be made
at the next meeting.
Wayne Regelin asked if the lease for Kenai Air has terminated or what
was happening on it. Bill Brighton stated that they had set February
as the date for a meeting on the lease. A report will be made at the
next meeting.
Paul Turner offered his support of the City protesting the dump site
extension and if there are issues the Commission could give support on
or lack of support to, the Commission would like to know. Mr. Brighton
expressed the desire to hold off on any action until receipt of a response
■
.i
I
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMI5SIUN Page 7
Rogular Meuting, January 27, 1982
Dr. Turner also wished to voice his support of the enforcement the
City Administration has taken and the effort taken to clean up
the City. And the third cuiamunt would be to ask for input at the
next meeting on what is happening with the non -airport related
businesses along Willow Street as pointed out by .Jim Swalley.
r Mrs. Glick, and Mr. Brighton pointed out that these lands were leased
at a time when the City needed money and when the original leases
were extended, the intent was to be airport related, however, was
not enforced.
Jack LaShot asked the Commission to review plans drawn up related
to the lands surrounding the Senior Citizens Center as requested
by the FAA. Chairman Bryson stated that it would be done after the
meeting.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the next meeting will be February 10,
1982.
' Dr. Turner moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to adjourned.
Motion passed upanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
.ter "/ 2,_, i, • f��
not Lopercretary
rM
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
r-1 Regular Meeting, February 10, 1982
Kenai City Hall
Philip Bryson, Chairman
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Phil Bryson, Jack Castimore, Jim Blanning, Lee Lewis,
Mary Quesnel, and Paul Turner
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
3. AGENDA APPROVAL
MOTION:
Paul Turner moved to approve the agenda with no additions or changes,
seconded by Mary Quesnel.
Motion passed unanimously
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 27, 1982
Jim Blanning asked that a change be made on page 4. paragraph 4.
the word "conclude" be changed to read "preclude".
MOTION:
Paul Turner moved, seconded by Lee Lewis, to approve the minutes with
the change indicated.
"
Motion passed unanimously
S. OLD BUSINESS
�-
A. Election of Chairman
•
fs
i.
i Chairman Bryson opened nominations for Chairman.
Jim Blanning nominated Phil Bryson, seconded by Jack Castimore.
Mr. Bryson accepted, vote was unanimous.
"
Chairman Bryson opened nominations for Vice Chairman.
Jim Blanning nominated Jack Castimore, seconded by Mary Quesnel.
Mr. Castimore accepted, vote was unanimous
(, MOTION:
Jim Blanning moved to close election of Chairman and Vice Chairman,
seconded by Paul Turner.
J Motion passed unanimously
3�
P
r �.
N
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 2
Meeting of February 10, 1982
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Lease Application: Edwin R. Lowry, dba Peninsula Development,
Kenai Spur Subdivision lots 2 block 1
Mr. Ed Lowry introduced his proposal to lease the space in order to
put in a building suitable for office and retail businesses. The
second floor would be mostly the office space. Mr. Lowry stated
that he had some clients that were interested in leasing space in
a commercial plaza and as soon as he had a few more prospects, he
would construct a building this year, providing the market does not
prohibit. The building will be designed in such a way that::a second
story can be added or an addition on the side.
Chairman Bryson called for questions from the Commission. Dr. Turner
noted that the plan calls for clearing and leveling of the entire lot
for future construction and expressed his feeling that should the
entire lot be cleared, it will then be comparable to, as an example,
downtown Lost Angeles where everything is concrete. Mr. Lowry felt
that trees obstruct the visibility and does not enhance the commercial
prospects, but to preserve the existing landscaping would be inferior
to removing it and redoing the landscape. Dr. Turner asked what
his plans were for landscaping and he answered that it would be mostly
shrubs and grass. It was pointed out that just because a business is
in Kenai, the trees don't have to be mowed down just to be visible.
There are not many trees there, but what are there, should be maintained.
There is a movement towards beautification within the city community.
Phil Bryson also expressed his concern with the landscaping as it was
proposed. He suggested leaving 25% of the trees already there, and
some square footage requirement on landscaping within a given time
schedule.
Jim Blanning asked Mr. Lowry if he would mind explaining his financing,
if at this time there was sufficient financing to go ahead with what
he proposed. Mr. Lowry's answer was somewhat inaudible, however,
it was indicated that he needed one or two other prospects before he
could culminate it, also, condition on Alaska Industrial Development
Authority loan.
Jim Blanning commented on the time schedule presented, in that it is
sparse, showing the dates May 1982 to September 1983 with completion
date pf August 1982 to March 1984, and felt he would be more comfortable
with a more specific time line in a phase outline including landscaping.
Dr. Turner asked that, with that point, a definitive time table be
drawn up and Mr. Lowry return. There have been concerns by this body,
the city attorney, and the city council that individuals have tied
up land for long periods of time and what needs to be done is to have
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 3
Meeting of February 10, 1982
a time table the individual would live up to and safeguard the city,
and if the table were not lived up to, the lease could be withdrawn.
Phil Bryson pointed out that four signs were indicated in the site plan,
and asked that the sign code be investigated before moving ahead.
Regarding access to the Spur Highway, it was agreed that there does
now exist a problem with regard to main thoroughfare access. One of
the major expenses for the City were small feeder streets to encourage
businesses on those streets and ease the flow off the Spur Highway.
The veterinary clinic was cited as an example, with the main entrance
not off the secondary street, but to the Spur, creating congestion.
Dr. Turner asked that approval would be granted commesurate with right
of ways being approved by the State. Tesoro was cited as an example
of planning in that the parking lot had been paved right to the curb's
edge, going across the state right of way and making the definition
between parking lot and street unclear.
Phil Bryson asked if the city regulations governing parking were being
met, Mr. Lowry stated that it did, including when the second addition
was completed.
Jack LaShot was asked if there were any adjustments being proposed,
there was one. A frontage road is being planned but will affect the
lot next to it only, making that lot smaller by .7 acre.
MOTION:
Jim Blanning moved, seconded by Paul Turner to table the application
until the next regular meeting.
Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote
7. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no City, Borough, or Administrative reports
S. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
None
9. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Jack Castimore gave a brief report on the meeting of Alaska '84,
expressing his enthusiasm for the kind of support and interest the
community had ahown towards a celebration, not necessarily aimed
at Alaska '84, but surely to promote the community.
.J
KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 4
8 �.
Meeting of February 10, 19 2
10 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the next meeting will be February 24.
MOTION:
Paul Turner moved, seconded by Jim Blanning to adjourn.
Motion passed unanimously
Respectfully submitted:
J et Loper, S er. tary
a. J
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH '• ��
REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING ••.., ,, _
FEBRUARY 16, 19821 700 P.tg. ;.dic�rnK
BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
SOLDOTNA, ALASKA
- A C. E N D A- Ansombly
A. CALL TO ORDER Douglas
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Glanvir
Glanville
Jenn
C. INVOCATIONS Rev. Howard Snively, Grace Brethren King
McBride
D. ROLL CALL McCloud
McOnhan
E. SEATING OF NEW ASSEMBLYMEMBERS (none) Sehnefermayer
Arnean
F. APPROVAL OF 1111H)TES OF FEBRUARY 2.'1982 Brandon
Corr
G. COMMITTEE REPORTS Crapuchettes
Crawford
(a) Finance (Douglas, Crawford, Schaeformeyer) Davis
(b) Local Affairs (McCahan, Corr. McBride, McCloud) Dimmick
(c) Public Works (Brandon, Glanville, Artless)
(d) Education/Legislative (Fischer. King,
Crapuchettes Jonn, Dimmick)
te) Land Disposal (Crnppuchettes. Brandon, Corr)
<[) Special, Ord, 81-8] (McBride, Crapuchertea,
Douglas, McGahan, Davis)
H. AGENDA APPROVAL
I. ORDINANCE HEARINGS
V
(a) Ord, 81-2 "Delegating Municipal Zoning Powers to
McZ'IEtaa of the Borough at the Option of Each
Municipality" (Mayor)
(b) Ord. 81-133 "Amending Section 5.16.090 of the Borough
Coda or dr3inancea to Exempt Senior Citi::nno from tiro
Payment of Sales Taxes" (Douglas)
(c) Ord. 81.136 "Providing for the Rczonfnp, of ,, Fivn Acre
Parcel at the Internection of Strawhr•rry Road and :pur
Highway, City of Kenai from Rural kefadential (RR)
District to Genornl Commercial (CC) Uintriet" (Mayor,
Request of Planning Commission)
(d) Ord. 81.133 Subatituta "F.nactillF a Ruviried and
umpre uni;M on ng Coda for that Port Joe .rf rho
Borough Lying Within the Boundaries of thr• City of
Snldotnn" (Mayor. Request of Planning Cummianion)
I
,Vff.4fW.9u;i:tlQ (a)
Ord. 82-7 "Appruppriatinp State of Alaska Deparr-
Runource Land Disposal urant Funds
muni oi''llsturaI
to Asaiat in the Survey, Development and Land
Diapoeal of Grey Cliff Subdivision" (Mayor)
(f)
Ord, 82.8 "Enacting Section 1,25.01 Enr.ablLshinq
Residing
Vru arencu for Disabled American Veterans
in the Borough" (McBride)
J. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
(a)
Ord. 82-11 "An Ordinance of the Kvnni Peninsula
orougF;�laska, Providing for the Issuance of
Bonds the Borough In the
General Obligation of
Aqgreggato Principal Amount of Not to Excaod
Required to Refund
$16,500,000 to Provide Funds
Curtain Outstanding General Obligation Bonds of
Certain Details of Such Bonds
the Borough, Fixing
and Authorizing Their Sale" .(Mayor)
(b)
Ord. 82-12 "Rezoning a Portion of Tract A. $wires
on, City of Kenai From Rural Residential
u v a
(RR) To a General Commercial (CG) District" (Mayor,
Request of Planning
(c)
Ord.fg�Commission)
roug2-1odo of Ordinances toSection lApproveOanfFxhe
tannion
of the Boundaries of the Nikiaki Fire Service Area
Subject to Ratification By the Voters
ppWithin the
Election
dgof
proposed
te(Mayor, Request NFVA)al
on the Question"
(d)
Ord. 82-14 "Incorporating the Ridgeway Fire Service
Medical
1y�.:;�7•1::::4• ,tArea
an the Cent -fill Peninsula Emoraancy
Service Area Into a Single
Service and Ambulance
Service Area to Provide Fire and Emergency Medical
and Ambulance Service, Calling for a Special Elec-
tion to Elect a Board of Directors, and Repealing
Chapter 16.36 and Chatter 16.40 of the Borough
Coda of Ordinances" (Dovia i Fischer)
(e)
Ord. 82-15 "Amending Section 5.16.090 of the Borough
Retail sale of Food
o a o ) dlnancua to Exempt thu
Products for Human Consumption and Exempting Pur-
ehaaoa of Gasoline and Homo Heating, Oil from Borough
Sales Tax" (Fischer)
(f)
ArTidinancesntoJ5hugh
Provide an ExemptionofMa
Family Automobile from the Borough Personal Property
w
Tax for Senior Citizens" (Fischer)
MW ;
(8) 1 g,_rd� 8j4r7'J'Rupaa ling Section 2.04.020 of the Borough
0 d
nancus and Amundino Section 2.04.
Relating to the Election and the Powers and Duties
of the borough Mayor" (Brandon)
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS
(4)
Rots. 82.28 "Approving the Contract Document Phase
70—r—TWOW—chor
Point School Additions and Ranova-
tiOns (1982) Project" (Mayor)
(b)
Ran, 82-29 "Authorizing Additional Surveying Costs
Tor t9a can Creak Road Project"
(Mayor)
e
20 "Exprointh Approval and Support of
PAR AIMMOL
to the Distribution of the Sc&tets
Natural R63oureq W41th to Alaakunu and for th.
Enactment of House Bill No. 642 in the Twelfth
Logi ture, Second Session of the State Legis-
lature"
lature (Davis)
(d)
Ron. 82-31 "Recommending That the Twelfth Alaska
Legislature, Second
Session, Make a Special
Appropriation or Grant for the Purchase of Fire
Fighting Equipment and Construction of Fire
Fighting Facilities for the Ridgeway Fire Service
ArQs" (Mayor. ROqUOst of RFSA Board)
W
Resolution of Con g tu oUn9yfnd Commendation
pC jgt1
(In appreciMtT r,
3 O5
L.
PENDING
LEGISLATION
(4)
Ord. 81-83 (Limits tax to approval by voters)
In
co=ittea
W
Ord. 81-119 Amended To Provide for the Award
of Contracts and PUrChaOOS Of Supplies and Equip-
ment to LOC41 Raoidont Bidders If the Bid to Not
Moro Than Five Percent Uglier than the Lowest Non-
Rasident Bid" (Fiachar) In Finance Cmta)
(c)
Ord. 81-129 "Amending See. 2.08.070 of'the Borough
Code to Require Legislative Actions of the Assembly
to be Adopted by 4 Majority of the Total Membership
Of the Aonambly and to EatabLLah the Vote on Other
Matters" (McG4han) Enactud w/Reconsidur.ition
W
Ord. 81-132 "Providing Two Appraiser Positions to
the Aa56§Sfn9 Department and Appropriating Funds"
(Mayor) Znnuto4 w/ReconoLderation
j V :
■
f
(e) Ord. 81-134 "Amending Section 16.08.020 and
Section 16.08.030 of tho Borough Code of Ordi.
".""4`�rr�t':�rttd';:�r.�•:ssr,rbA
nances to Provide for an Elected Board for the
Central Peninsula Hospital Service Area..."
(McCahan)
,
Defeated a/Bacon.
•11+%Si,
(f) Ord. 82-3 "Amending Section 20.12.040 of the
Borouxh ode of Ordinances
nAuthorize
i
-
PlanningC CommissiontoEstablishthePlatting
Fee" (Mayor for P.C.) Enacted a/Recon.
(g) Ord. 882-9 "To Amend Section 20.04.040(A) of the
Borouof Soldome fCode romOthenProvisionsto xclude
Eliminhe ate
Which
the Preparation of Plats for Designated Subdi-
visions (Mayor, Req. City) Hearing 3-2-82
(h) Ord. 82-10 "Amending Section 4.08.030 of the
Borough Code of Ordinance to Provide that
-.
Candidatea
Leaste at
Forty Percentg(40Z)oofHust the Votes
-
Cast
Cast in
the Regular Election or a Runoff Election Must.
Be Held" (McCahan i Brandon) Hearing 3-2-82
M.
FORMAL PRESENTATIONS WITH PRIOR NOTICE UPON MATTERS
ON THE MEETING AGENDA NOT
'•
�q
tJ.
MAYOR'S REPORT
=-
(a) Financial Report for January, 1982
^
(b) Liquor License Protests and Res. 82-5
(c) McNeil Canyon Soils Investigation
0.
OTHER BUSINESS (none)
0
P.
ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS UPOtJ MATTERS
NOT CONTAINED IN THE ASSEMBLY'S
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING
-
R.
INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS
S.
NOTICE OF NEXT MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT (March 2, 1982)
t
y
•t�_a::.."'.-:ry`r;. ;��;!!tl�.:e.!':.':'�"...••: �i':::" ^�t'i•"t a12J!�,.::... `-�'".+.r:•. .;Y�'''
"'.,�r: '...::: �w
NUGENS RANCH
SRA BOX 6395
376-4534
February 16, 1982
Ben T. Delahay, City Attorney
City of Kenai
Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Dear Mr. Delahay:
A / _ �I
PALMER, ALASKA
99645
After a year of planning, and the purchase of a site in the Mat-
anuska-Susitna Borough, the first long-term alcoholism treatment
program in the State of Alaska will soon be operational.
NUGENS RANCH, on the old Wasilla-Palmer Highway, will provide a
6 month - 2 years recovery and rehabilitation program for 48 per-
sons from every part of Alaska. The goal of sobriety will be
achieved by following the philosophy and beliefs of Alcoholics
Anonymous. The goal of developing useful life skills will grow
from daily experiences on the RANCH. Each client will maintain
communicatiors with his/her referring community and will be dis-
charged back to that community.
We are presently writing a grant application for 1982 - 1983,
to fund the first full year of operation. As part of the FY83
SOADA application, we need an expression of need and support
from persons and agencies in every part of Alaska. We hope you
will make such a statement for the record.
* Do you feel a long-term alcoholism treatment programs is
needed in Alaska?
* Are there people in your community who could benefit
from referral to long-term care?
* Are there clients known to you whom you would recommend
for immediate in -take at NUGENS RANCH?
* Do you support the plan of close cooperation between re-
ferring agencies and NUGENS RANCH, with the goal of send-
ing a sober resident back to his/her home community?
* Can you suggest community groups who might have an interest
in volunteer support for the long-term alcoholism treat-
ment program at NUGENS RANCH?
We thank you for your attention to the development of NUGENS RANCH.
We hope to hear from you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely , 'CCTV �C
p%,� /ti /j!' efi �7
Leonard tJ : Nugent _/
Executive Director
t Y 1 COAL C"r
1.L-. %,
- •-'•,yam
v-�.
a,i,..,�,,
i
�Ttira
2-/6-�•L�
I
Cg'p tq / Jeloc -
0��•
S»,Prcv, Si•�l�irey.,ce
Fa.,�
�
ParP pJ e
!(l'! �r✓L ReJPr,/4
Q9/9NC G
i
a.
C..
1
3
i I
1
2
3
4
r M
I
< 3'1ro' i
4
1
7/.R
71V
F; ., e 4, tr B/dS
4:6rgr%
; .. i i
<; '
ro o . 6
r'ooli ..
I I
1
i
8
7/7
/NC r
I
9
7A3
644„d)
to
10
�;
a
1t
7�/tt
w �1 =..,�.-o% l �� dy
�
i� s!o 0.0l i
!
I
12
7S-P .
ILL
12
13
14
eta
? ��
I'prFlf G;//
.� 'I "s J �'r o t fI
I IS79167I % (
70 911 i
f 13
1 14
•
is
- 7 ry M a��., 4
I
' o o
� I
i !
to
11
6a/Sate, Z-i6-��
33SS; i 966Y7;
%//3,30. 11
1
-
t9Pam.,
I
19
20
21 7s6
I
20
�. 1HVP. 21
Fir4; 0�7- tPc,9 /1e4r. a-i7-ea I
22'
_
22
23
d'333SS'•" 96SY7
fO9SDOS 23
24
! ! I
I I .24
25
---------—----r-
_ _"
28
i
1 it t
2b
f i
21
it
'
28
�.
I
29
29
31
3t
i
32
3
33
t
?3
34
3s
-- -
35
--------- -- - - - -
_ _ --- - -- - ---
- 3;
35
31
36
:7
38
3i
30 :
39
i
40�
40
I
ALASKA 1984 MEETING
Kenai City Administration Building
Feb. 6, 1982, lOsOO AM
Presents
Marge O'Reilly Shirley Wilson
Coralyn Day Jeweldean Montgomery
Penny Dyer Glenn Jackson
Pat Porter John Monfor
Jack Castimore (chrman) Roger Meeks
Tim Wisniewski Peggy Arness
Ron Malston Cherry Carson
Harold Dale Fr. Targonsky
Roger Siebert
Glenn Jackson: It would be better to celebrate Kenai's
200th anniversary. Get local talent to write a script
on what has happened in the last 200 years.
Jack Castimore: We could use the Ballad of Kenai for a
show.
Penny Dyer: Could we get Alaska 1984 funds for an audi-
torium?
Peggy Arness: Suggest using Alaska 1984 funds as a stepping
stone for a 1991 celebration. Apply for a convention -
type building at the FAA area, similar to the Centennial
bulding in Sitka.
Tim Wisniewski: The PR man from Alaska 1984 in Anchorage
made us feel like we are just helping Anchorage celebrate.
Jack Castimore: Why not let Anchorage do our advertising?
Peggy Arness: The Anchorage Chamber of Commerce has not
taken an active part in Alaska 1984, they are still
watching.
Jack Castimoras Do you want to make this committee a
nucleus of a 200 year celebration? City Engineer
LaShot is preparing a proposal for use of the FAA
area. The Senior Citizens proposed building is
there.
Fr. Targonsky: Suggest we propose to the Legislature
that the money be pro -rated by area.
Glenn Jackson: We could put the show in a tent, like
the old Chatauquas. This would also show the area
we need an auditorium.
Jack Castimore: We should find out how much each community
is allocated and if we can get more. 18 is $38,000.
The Committee agreed the 1991 concept is better. They
agreed the tent idea was good.
Roger Meeks: The area behind the Tesoro station is also
a good location.
Glenn Jacksons We could put up a big sign for tourists
to see.
The Committee agreed that shows to be considered ares
Ballad of Kenai
The Marching Band
Sweet Adelines
Redoubt Chamber Orchestra
Roger Meekss We need a money maker.
Cherry Carsons Soldotna has formed a committee, Mrs. Dane
Clark is chairman. Could we use the Alaska 1984 funds
to put in a parking lot and prepare the grounds for
a convention center concept, then put up the tent?
W'.,
.1. sr...'
S
_2_
Glenn Jackeons We should go after more money and make
this
a co-operative effort with other communities.
The Committee agreed to have Jack Castimore contact Homer
and Sewerd Chambers of Commerce
6!
to see if they have
any funds and how much.
Jack Castimores We should involve the Senior Citizens.
Shirley Wilsons
They are enthused about the program.
Harold Dales We could have
a museum -type exhibit in
the tent also.
John Monfors We could have movie shows of the City.
The Committee agreed to ask for a $38?000 budget.
Roger Meekss ke could contact various Church groups to
see if they have any large tents
i
used for Group
meetings.
Shirley Wilsons Suggest contacting the oil companies if
a blow-up tent
I
was available.
Glenn Jacksons There could be one available.
!
Adjourned 1200 Noon.
..;.^. ..
Janet Whelan
City Clerk
fp .
1
City of Kenai
4
F
i I
7 t
r
i
E
1
i
t
z�
ALASKA 1984 MEETING
j Kenai City Administration Building
Feb. 16, 1982, 7:00 PM
Presents
Vincent O'Reilly John Quinley
Jack Castimore Wayne Regelin
Janet Whelan Tom Wagoner
Committee agreed they.will be called the Kenai
Celebration Task Force
Jack Castimore will write the report for the 2-18-82
meeting in Anchorage.
I
Jack Castimore: The High School students and Historical
Society are enthused about helping with a picture
show. All are enthused if it is in conjunction
with Kenai's 200th year celebration.
Vince O'Reilly: Suggest we prepare a budget but with
! reservations so we don't become listed by the Anchorage
Committee as supportive without Council and community
backing.
' Jack Castimore: He is preparing 2 budgets, one at the
$2,000 figure, one higher if funds are available.
k Wayne Regelin: He is uncomfortable with any involvement
1 - with Alaska 1984. Since we committed ourselves by
Planning & Zoning vote, we will have to go ahead,
but we should proceed slowly.
Vince O'Reilly: July 23, 1982 is the 25th anniversary
of the Swanson River oil discovery. The Borough is
preparing a celebration of that. This will have to
be considered in our plans also.
Wayne Regelin: We can't use Alaska 1984 funds without
getting involved with the politics of Alaska 1984.
's He would rather use City funds for any celebration.
Tom Wagoner: We should stay out of Alaska 1984 in our
a celebration. Alaska 1984 is using us to promote
their program. The majority of the people are against
the celebration if it will cost tax dollars, but not
against the celebration.
Jack Castimore: We will need a coordinator and some base
money to build on.
Tom Wagoner: He doesn't think the 25th year is that im-
portant. If anyone should celebrate, Arco should.
I
I_
1-
7
1 ,
'i
1-
t
ALASKA 1984 MEETING
Feb. 16, 1982
Page 2
Vince O'Reilly: The younq (to age 17) and elderly are the
ones that should be targeted. Those in the middle
years could be involved and it would do them good.
Our growth has been astonishing. It should be shown
to the young people and the old people should get
some recognition. An example is the pipeline. it
was built with a small population and was a tremendous
undertaking. There was more to the oil discovery
than just oil company involvement. All the people
' were involved.
Jack Castimores He is looking at the economic standpoint.
He can't imagine why the motels, restaurants, etc.
aren't beating doors down on this. The oils companies
admit to another 15 years more of production. The
` average American g gets 200 services per year. They
should be available here. We are failing to meet
these services. That means more jobs. If tourists
who fish here would just spend the night here, there
are bucks there.
/ Tom Wagoners Our vacancy rate is very low in the summer.
We should aim at winter.
I
Wayne Regelin: He thought it could be done with local
funds and people. It could be coordinated better
by the Chamber of Commerce than the City or Planning
b Zoning. All the ideas submitted at the first meet-
ing were not asking for money. He doesnt' want to
even ask for the original $2,000. Don't send it back
as a publicity move, it should be done quietly.
Vince O'Reilly: Some communities are going ahead with
great enthusiasm.
Wayne Regelin: They have paid people. Most people are
against using tax dollars, not against the celebration.
It might cost the City a little money and employee
` time, but the celebration should be volunteer.
The Committee agreed to ask for the $2,000 but will emphasize
local volunteer involvement.
I Adjourned 8:00 PM.
i
.7Anet Whelan, City Clerk
40
rankiln
aka 99801
5-1325
UgWATWE BULLETIN #30
February 12, 1982 ` + 1032
ITEMS OF INTEREST
Revenue Sharing Payments: On Monday, the Department of Community and Regional
Affairs expects to have final population figures needed to compute FY 82
revenue sharing payments. Checks should be in the mail by the end of the
month.
FY 83 State Bud:tst: The House Finance Committee accepted all the CRA cuts
recommended by the subcommittee, including reduced revenue sharing from the
Governor's proposed figure of $57,721,300 to $55,707,600, which is exactly the
amount appropriated for FY 82, and eliminating the Office of Coastal
Management.
IN COMMITTEE
HB 146 - Payment Procedures on Public Contracts: House Labor and Commerce
Committee amended RB 146 by adding RB 518 (same as SB 495) which requires
interest to be paid on retainage, with the interest accruing from the date of
approval of a pay estimate until the date of payment. CSHB 146 is in Rules,
awaiting placement on the House calendar.
HB 279 - School Construction Assistance: A Senate Finance Committee substitute
is being drafted that would raise the reimbursement percentage for post 1977
debt from 80Z to 90Z. The two year time lag would remain for all cash payment
reimbursement and for pre 1/1/82 debt. Payments on debt incurred after 1/1/82
would be on a current year basis. Senate Finance will hold a hearing probably
the week of February 22.
HB 618 - State Aid for Capital Projects: House State Affairs Committee held
hearings February 4 on this bill which establishes an entitlement program for
municipal capital projects. Subject to legislative appropriation, the fund
could contain over $300,000,000. A constitutional amendment proposed in HJR 66
would dedicate the funds, eliminating the need for legislative appropriation.
HJR 66 is in Judiciary. State Affairs took no action on HB 618.
i
Legislative Bulletin P30 - page 2
SB 612 - Municipal Assistance Fund: Senate CRA moved out of committee this
bill which raises from 102 to 30% the amount the legislative may appropriate to
the municipal assistance fund from corporate income tax revenue. The effect is
to bring the level up closer to what it would have been without last year's
changes to the oil and gas taxes. SB 612 has a further referral to Finance.
SENATE BILLS INTRODUCED
8B 699 - Business Inventory Exemption: Introduced by Mulcahy, this bill would
authorize municipalities to exempt business inventories from taxation.
Referred to CRA and Finance.
SB 700 - Elevator Safety Standards: Introduced by the Labor and Commerce
Committee, this bill would eliminate inspection by thr- Department of Labor of
elevators within a municipality if that municipality adopted state standards or
standards more stringent. Referred to the Labor and Commerce Committee.
SB 709 - Federal Budget Impact Fund: Introduced by Ferguson and Sackett, this
bill creates an Alaska Federal Budget Impact Fund, for grants to state and
non -state agency programs that have received a reduction or transfer of federal
funds in FY 83. The Governor will authorize the use of the fund, which shall
not exceed $300,000,000. After a hearing on 2/11/82, Senate CRA moved the bill
out with a recommendation to include authorization for a CRA study on the
subject. Further referral to Finance.
SB 716 - Revenue Sharing/Municipal Assistance: Introduced by the Rules
Committee by request of the Governor, this bill combines the revenue sharing
and municipal assistance programs into one, using the revenue sharing formula
for distribution. It increases the minimum entitlement for each municipality
to $100,000 and creates a separate program for unincorporated communities.
Referred to CRA and Finance.
SB 725 - Assembly Composition and Reapportionment: Introduced by the Community
and Regional Affairs Committee, this bill proposes amendments to Title 29
designed to clean up the conflicts that now exist without any major policy
changes. Referred to CRA and Judiciary Committees.
HOUSE BILLS INTRODUCED
HB 702 - Supplemental Housinst Development Grant Fund: Introduced by Duncan and
17 others, this bill would appropriate $16,000,000 to the Department of CRA for
the supplemental housing development grant fund. Referred to CRA and Finance.
HB 706 - Day Care Assistance Program: Introduced by Rogers and 6 others, this
bill would appropriate $1,300,000 to the Department of CRA to finance the day
care assistance program during FY ending June 30, 1982. Referred to CRA and
Finance.
Legislative Bulletin #30 - page 3
HE 723 - Aid to Unincorporated Communities: Introduced by Adams and
Montgomery, this bill extends the time during which aid to unincorporated
communities may be paid under CH 60, SLA 1981 (SB 168 grants) in order to
accoirmodate the legislature splitting the appropriation into two years.
Amendments have been prepared to extend the time for municipalities and to
clarify the grants to native village governments. House CRA will hold a
hearing on the bill on Wednesday, February 17. The bill has a further referral
to Finance.
HB 724 - Appropriation for Unincorporated Communities Aid: Introduced by Adams
and Montgomery, this bill appropriates $24,981,000 for the program in HB 723.
HB 724 apparently is a drafting confusion because there is already an estimated
$7.5 million more in account than is needed to fund all of the unincorporated
communities at $1,000 per capita. Referred to CRA and Finance. House CRA will
also hear this bill on 2/17/82.
HB 736 - Home Rule Municipalities: Introduced by 3turgulewski, Gilman,
Ferguson and Fischer, this bill would allow an unincorporated community to go
directly to a home rule municipality. It also changes the population
requirement from 400 to 600. Referred to CRA.
HB 746 - Revenue Sharing/Municipal Assistance: Introduced at the Request of
the Governor, this bill is the same as SB 716. Referred to the CRA and Finance
Committees.
HB 754 - Business Inventory Exemption: Introduced by Zharoff and Grussendorf,
this bill is the same as SB 699 and has been referred to Labor b Commerce and
Finance.
RESOLUTIONS
SR 21 - Municipal Aid Prosram: Introduced by Ferguson, this resolution
requests 100X funding for FY 82 and FY 83 municipal aid program and calls for
enactment of an area cost differential. It has been referred to the CRA and
Pinance Committees.
SJR 67 - Alaska Railroad: Introduced by the Transportation Committee, this
resolution requests the exemption of the Alaska Railroad from federal
employment ceilings and work force reductions. Referred to the Transportation
Committee.
SJR 69 - Alaska Railroad: Introduced by the Transportation Committee, this
resolution establishes conditions of transfer of ownership of the Alaska
Railroad. Referred to the Transportation Committee.
1e
PENINSULA CLARION
FesRUARtt IZ IM
x4ziR;�i
CITY OF KENAI
PUBLIC NOTICE
The City of Kenai Is proposing to make Changes to the rates that are charged for
providing water and "war service. The proposed rates are embodied In the document
entitled "Public Utility, Regulation and Rates", the next of which follows In full.
These rates are being prepared in an effort to match costs on the Individual water and
sewer systems with revenues derived from the respective systems. Under terms of a grant
received from the sewer system must pay for operation and maintenance of the sewer
system.
Generally, the proposed rates will Increase residential sewer by $7.45 per month (70.6
peroent), and reduce residential water by $4.30 per month (35.8-percent). For more in.
formation, you may contact the City Finance Department at the City Administration
Building, or call283.7M.
A public hearing will be held on these proposed rates at the regular Kenai Council
Meeting of February 17,1982at the Council Chambers of the City Administration Building.
A.Al"arst"
TM following NgWedW of the CRY of 9", pwbktmg 10 tho water and "war SySNm, MW b"n Issued under
M auMNy of TNls 17 of M YAW City Coos Of OrdInwu". PAPUIbrM Nstrtd pmw b this deb an wpwoWes by
MrwOtAs6olNalhatbibrr.
t.Ap lou"I rsommitNobenoresponlaw"YoftMOusbnNrtoa"forudiftysablesordNwnNnum"
ofoervbebyslgnlags a",-ofdwdOoORyAdministration ""Idiom K",ANska
� 2wtwaMsawaCasate6aaaM6araeleaw
a ThepgpMyOwnNahls CMkaObrrsay apply forawtNrwd "lwrptnnN N/aCMMOtbnandltwltMabA
W//wksltn/1�TMMMOatotwaWortNwer"rrke0onneotbnpkeateMbnwW bebanebrtMOroprtr owner.
b. At ell lions M new 940160 ls prov100d. 60 = MOtMM b OslgNg prha/f OyeMmS, wells. "ptb treks,
estSOOOls,ab, /htR aOhrlffeattyQNEafkltord fromthet„Ny tyst4mandtn4ku"dlstaMNttW.
C.ANwsW UNDOlNerd tumoffSwld M opsrstbM of the kffilla At the property ON $MS be MOO by the City
ptfaorswt oMy. A No of $10 will be NNW on rspuest for Wnton snot tuff (aNsr ktNMN tufrion) during 000M duty
hours.A 1"OfItOwINOa NrNdon wbuests fotumonduMp perl0dtothorthal rlormtidutyhouw,and whetswrtuch
anbrtNfOtpAreddwbdeRal)1NrMaCCowlt
d.ANEusbnNrssNObewpulwdlo OMMOS"OMIOslop trdWallis WIN. IfNdo"notexlst,InsidesbulkfNg
Deft to They WM"be baled on M "Nko enbrbg the building ah"d of any branch lines whew It Is
rsaONyttxstsibN InlhaewMofar"rpwly. .
O, F.00lt aW owy building "nod by tic wafter utility $ Nll Mva a "pawls oulsWO obutoff. In ON event It N
NlpooefeM to gat a seperata outelile shutoff within ON pubNo rightoFtrsy, the property owner shoo prork0 ths shut•
off wilStptlwbpftl"andakaWN, in few of tic City. an sawriont providing access for the for the City personnel
bo*ktybOL
LV*pNpOrlyanrlsroWbaweponseto fornotltymg MCNy.W4 SW $40adb0ak1441 eau"t N0"wlda
babfdbWAO ea
a ovefM 1M6erwss: Fordonreetk and commercial customers, 4dp0011I9 MQulr$dOf $20 for wswsertt"and S20
IMSMW SW4MTheeadOMUmagbotawndedupon wallies MWIWOYNMOftkmly palymenthisIM.
4.11*aalw TM use of firs hyWwws N praftlIM weeps for spew sxusl;m when approval. In writing, h" boon
Obrkftd 40m M /Ilw Dtperknlltt,a110 upon paynwntof ale u" Eflelge. A Oep"N of tee N NOuItW b"wN aNfut
tl" of M OydMt and will baakrff010 N noaMNterwlosb ttptdwdwMnfiydrsnt u" b COnIpItNd. Rowe b ai{O a
Coetfdrwtwusapea
S. Comosof Cetawas6wue There MA be no Comm EOMMOON file u" by So" propooll" or bmNNa NoEon-
nooNonwil bopwmRwsEm"pmpw*ww unlsm"sestatMNerlumpstrwpaynlMt h"beMpad.
s. L"0040 K07ssa: K "red be the properly Ownwa rsVorimDSlty to know the loatfon of, and hew friarilW, sire
kqb"andthswwkoanMttaterbrllacorwNetbn.ThsattnotaAfksy00xeorkerfheNbaa4"Sr4"woodP06t4foot In
,Mtg11R, ptrMd wftKe wait Ilrek toparidthe wok "ovate/' #*W NO In black ANlfrs no smOW that 2" high. f Wty
OwMfaM10d0 not (lee fat ttertdad mtAtereheughew /omeolMraNthOO of toatrq nNu keybosa of b pNpsrW
bsumftcOstoflocmin lft*NOfmseeesey.
7.60worstat4seCNtna(rs No ptrsorN thrall Install a "raw OaNmb" too building without pbtibe In tic fi"nNrthe
buif0U1ps110 atarsyElwipsOfdlKnbnOf MtewrbN,asaw4rbN01Mn1gdof 4"mNNaau dNm.w. ThapnopsAy
owrtereAW mwkawtanwNrwxktneloatbnotsuenetOsnouN.
•RwMwMFrYes In tMa"otaONkquwNwaNrands4werbut, thaproptfNyownerrlhrW tNnaa rssponaBN.
RaaM
TMokrgesteusasatwirs�ndeswwsyttamswxnNOMCNyotxwW awastobwa:
L61�E0lIL6A•Ot(11sAAL00Y6aTIcspYlOfaaATEap10M4f8Eaa0)
IlerMsaM
WSW
amm
0"Ortw04offlOr
•$7.70
$/5.00
akldsotdeubbOsaapaNrawikperfaaWyuNt
6730
s11600
AptArawM,tM"ormtow unibuaderorMroof,per tamer unN•
ekgsomaewaNdbyowrNr
$GAD
$13.60 t
Tea OneInglsbtoreourtpaen)
57.70 '"
6t6A0
TNlsrs,fhwapalasoablacaW,perfrseerunR•
6kgebMkg
$$so
$1340
etpraesOSlMlg
$7.70
$law
sow&vh imowgmv"m m
$3/6
$ e.00
a lftmmt wonofwwattn,
11111111110141, C0110m01M1e The Seim /etle" 1s to*W d to "wits ussd OXCIUOwty for Ow" dmwft pw-
pOMS)MOls1111gIMhW fromcpMM1EW aolMrusesotrarraeewerawvka.
6.sG1Es11t6 s•COIMtia{ilaLs61tY1CiM011Y676aa6)
ptYtast
onmd chs" 0'"sc me b kdhidrrd actor"" wI
solar connection b ow Inch or ergot, and Is rated M Now
tlglSraiwtt f kq ties. Tnb u u adetuon to the u"ehrea)
1"lfwsk4
1 M"lforrke
1 N"ter4k4
4" ifwperservkomust b4maNlaO
s+l«r
eSthNaua4• tubaMows44ach
t{ONNngworks,patOONWgmtsehrN
saw""sys,smussntenipar"01016 1)
Griot. wkhcwwash IscNNNo
Grwsah,aubnMk, per(acuity
Grwnk,sw4omko,persWI
CINrch". losses, ck", barque rooms too bw a IasteuNnt
CNalleraswcommmio wwdrNa per fsdllty
0"8 • Inman"" otw"w mowtspuuw
Oeslers' and OM1Nb' Oink", got*= or chair (ptych Wrest
i OpbrslfkNb, spOhollkaNN)
Owges, lfwvkelfNllolM
HarISM, wwwMrsoea
wlthw"hmgfacUNMt
Nallew, tiwtanorapwt with washing faeenMe
NppSallf, pat 010
rsoNN, moNN, rNont, pal roan
war► salver
$ 040
61240
62000
62M
$ 6 t6
$18340
$22,00
$11.00
see so
614as
S .0/
$63.16
s+100
SS6A0
SUM
$61.70
$ $ sot
L4t6.0o
s61A0
$ 2530
SM.00
636.1E
{ 20
6/6ts0
{470
{t090
trig
{7tis
Soso
$ 2210
$1100
snoo
Sets
{ts00
1111eO
S1166
oem "I" ("Mushment providing /N•pms 4MwtL per
bad
:3.t0
t boo
wadrv.t"I•.«No.,perrn.okkM
tape
t21.t6
Mar"S.Mwt
St2t0
tII7d0
ONIa buidloo a! I a*" bill Is assumed by owner, per
ousInoes
t10A6
$26.16
Office, In muxgb olfbebulKing whom Individual lorianb aw
billed,psrbusmaes
$12.10
$27"
n"tww"b, calla, luech cowtten, buntems, WYNN and
+ bantwltl►kbahsns)ForeadbasMploss�
11.70
6 1.0E
Pubacoel4buldmo,wrest100rn
62.7E
$646
x"Mallonfaculty. psrmtro ln.samaorshowN,so.
16.2E
$1240
6olloob,per:a0ncas�aaNy
t Al
$ ,76
611011141111110 cmim OkPWWS No SIONs ketodso In rheppme
MIW. NON 1)
6hoMbasuly.porshidworeMU
66Ao
$12s6
6hdPe.�aOkOMrOYWbanOMaAOpebpershop
t6.60
6126E
Slo"moroan,paroolalwakoutboom" Whmoskoo"
t210
t600
studbs.ohoborphobNb
62&W
$am
svpwrwwkab.(eroom uowa)O#Oiei)
$us
S/60Jx)
Theaters:
InOoor,pers"t
6 .02
S Jx)
ouldoer,porstaN
$.w
$ ,10
TaWfft%Im ",bwslMWAkNOhwlapw"id
6.46
a1d0
x•Rgroroseastotyoffia
N6A0
ss6.36
Msto 1. Addkonal for other faeftittes such as romaurMt,
bf"Npo dlspenaaty, nil" ON Of tic appOtable on chores for
aschauohisowp.
Kale 3: When a w ouNM own upon aW hills no /parals
bat, no additions! Charst for a ben wig be sppllod, ifowwwr,
when a waNwaM half t "pawls ba , the boor slools will be
ChwgidelooghMtm
sma memArmOremonthsawoke.
Spa meftmi ewhewmowthano"cuuORWISaenlfdfew"MOawrw"mk4ar,obatwomo*c /swaw
fMIRO otfMCOMWSpNmb",MORyrater"than:rELWWfightlodelormklshowNNd4msndchwgourgsrthN
""Sdw"$ WbeapplNdmadspppU0ned1f4tw4ar UMCUUWAf .
CoopedPN NpwC%WS30perdWM
asaK6aiuo•fwpuTlMktt6alnrs601o1{4t6TsasO)
hewers►
warn
Conersbmhirrgplsnd 6100.00
CorreNNFNdrlb s60.00
C.onlNetlorlsr Sam
Orstfatows,ecturlsroW 6338E
klfENampNM s60Jx►
Cow wg4PbMOriodrers $23.8
OsaMasCAgsc N a06Nb4 to ins abom, t1M 1oNowNg shag OlfaddW whq Ore used CatrtaeaM N b►Oer titan
Sit int71.
llswvklf $ sJ)0
t K""rvkA 11200
1 N"fetYlEe 620.00
3" i brsaratdrksmtMtbe'tlarrsd.
MrrnwChwss Olwmono+•s rawiu.
6/werCAwt{ttt ktomhy sewer Chrgat shell fIs333 psrearN of raonsly walsrohrpaa
4.iCM=L60•F"PFA wfmmsgom
Fluthe»aM.6wrkbFaau INUMapbtdsnyaswms KOC11ANai
sptriCea�laMe
(s)WSW SOMP aund11'owabt&"owinSV Nebwa:tMo0Hill- MGry.to Qrygpa aulsarlkapAnger
systernslorlka pmYOW noisy.
O)ANfitspmtoctbn1N",sOrk►kWs.pp",trd"herow,pri"pmpewyatra0"owa d ktebfNd,aadSMrlYtsd
bYtheowelerartdbresatoatet
09) AN camann ere OlkswM ea ol" ON" and priwrty owmW f iuun will be node of tin avQwNe of M
CoerONM.
6!)At M option of MCKy,epristw tables sty 0/ aNlsnsO. TM Nnerand MN kNtaflstlon tftOoosf sRaNboM M
4iooOn"oftheetelnler,
(s)lN Np aoutbt fortr"oMs► titers tlooproreUOn /Itaablf pwmklseon 1M IInesamtNa, wwsapprotaot7y M
sty•
(ON tir"40f Mwrgar". Mright is r"wva0 by M CNy b Arm oilany Nov hydr{ntarsinelfprkwwstNtwnat M
dlwMaOcnoltnoGty Fk4GINferONlwarrelOnlatdpwlfan. -
(g) ff0 dooms furs flN sprkMNr ofsrras emu a dwoty cowecNd wNt Sto City sanft y 6/wlfrs, w" no cis"•
ronrwe6onwtlati"Wrveal O/parwYtlsd telwsMfkaproto0tfonNEW WaaoNwO{ptotMCkyssysttmanotpatblt
oouro//otcontrnmatOdwabr.
$$CNEOWS • MEWOM WAT069NM
FW6iaM FsrTMw"eoafbasalwwr
Fksts0A00gaia" 6Jb
Nett 170J100gau" t .60
wil l260m9oft N t .60
►at.1560,0000 1, t .30
Over fftpppgallons t Jo
t4ltsaawchol o►OrMasai:UWerawofmtaw.
owwsw wawAIS s fw
Mbummemw Cftw
1" toxogallns t SAO a
1 K" 13AODosoons t3f2t
t" soAOogaNOns $am
Overt" • syspecblCMkact.
TM Clty w"nves Of Nght b dtltmelee afa ems, Irp4. area mtenYN010►of ale realer jobs kwrtNd. MtNtwW NnNN
owing doNco dole b4 pumha"dwtd NNaNW browner and inspeoNd err tic Car• situ► rspW"n4asssny shou of
tna"by thaClty with costs billed tothoownsr.
HlfalwCMq": MMthy sawwcharpae stf W O/t33pwEM) of whew ehrg".
6.6CN60UL6 F • TOWIIARy tAMMLAMEM WAT[K 66Nv106(KgeWq
T.SGNs0UL6O•wATttaKAVMFCi6sUI o"CONeTRi amm
O"T600sawMechwp
$is
FaeroundlfoastesoltA00W.h often $1000
Foreschamlonoi 1J100 sot it (or pall" Ihawof► S" 00
FIN hydrant 4" nor tic P14Def" by aid SIN 040arNWI. aid ttpar peynM"1 to N4 GOV of M addnkina$ Charge of not
MM then pef usepy 61335 aer wit► S" f0
A SCNSOULS N • FtNMB USE,
awwr•S"A$
asawM•am
t. TMawrwN letlf a44erktrskrN reuaSfrrN IMCNy ter chase" N N"wNtsaMaesNens
aeeFlNsyOsyMshaterMF4aNwyS,l66S1/SeeOnNlfRssNWonMSNhf,fNt. William J.a/Onten
LM
F10.2ml.
z
- 3 -e;t ,
t
a -. a y- V 2 7% 00
a
I
a
J 1
r
Iu1
i
±I
1
l ,
it
C.�
GA
I
.I
i
I
.i