The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-03-03 Council PacketA" COUNCIL PACKETS 1982 MARCH Kenai City Council Meeting Packet March 3, 1982 ..-�.._....�.,__._•__- AMENDED -AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING, MARCH 3, 1982 - 700 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL �•-.+.rc'r..-.etr�r...<-: : ,•,:-i 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 4-4 C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Resolution 82-23 - Awarding Contract for -• Drainage Study - Quadra Engineering ��. ^ ; ;. `• D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, Feb. 17, 1982 2. Verbatim Translation, Jan. 20, 1982 E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Kenai Utility, to Kenai Peninsula Borougl, - --- Utility Location Problems in Public Rights of Way ' 2. Marla Adkins, Cordova - Latouche island F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Carmen Gintoli - Library Renovation ✓j 2. Purchase of Coyle's Property 3. Lease of Stoehner Property .._-A—_, Proposals from Appraisers for Redetermination of Airport Lands G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Ordinance 757-82 - increasing Rev/Appns - Prep, of Plans s Specs - Parking Lots, AirpoLt Terminal - $30,500 4. Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Preliminary Engrg, i Prep. - Float Plane r j Basin - Ordinancee 759759- 82 - increasing Rev/Appns - Drainage Study - $87,338 lox k_ 6. Settlement Offer - Rate Renegotiation on Leases to Southeentral Air, Inc. i Dave Diamond 7. Proposal for Kenai Boat Ramp H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning a Zoning 7. Harbor Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT 1 Nis — r c3 __ COUNCIL MEETING OF AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING MARCH 1, 1982 - 700 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval S. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Kenai Mall Merchants - Mall Parking Lot C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Resolution 82-23 - Awarding Contract for Drainage Study - Quadra Engineering D. MINUTES 1. Regular Moeting, Feb. 17, 1982 2. Verbatim Translation, Jan. 20, 1982 E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Kenai Utility, to Kenai Peninsula Borough - Utility Location Problems in Public Rights of Way 2. Marla Adkins, Cordova - Latouche Island P. OLD BUSINESS 1. Carmen Gintoli - Library Renovation 2. Purchase of Coyle's Property 3. Lease of Stoohner Property 0. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Prep. of Plans i Specs - Parking Lots, Airport Terminal - $30,500 4. Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Preliminary Engrg, i Prep. - Float Plane Basin - $5,300 5. Ordinance 759-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Drainage Study - $87,338 6. Settlement Offer - Rate Renegotiation on Leases to Southcentral Air, Inc. i Dave Diamond 7. Proposal for Kenai Boat Ramp H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 70, S. Finance Director 6. Planning i Zoning 7. Harbor Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT q ') 1 f 1 CITY 01: KENAI J RESOLUTION NO. 82-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PREPARATION OF A DRAINAGE STUDY OF SELECTED AREAS OF THE CITY TO QUADRA ENGINEERING, INC. WHEREAS, the following proposals of services for preparation of the study were submitted: Quadra Engineering, Inc. $ 78,392 Ott Water Engineers 199,643 S & S Engineers, Inc. --Hanson & Co. 128,040 WHEREAS, the proposals cover Priority Areas 1, 2, and 3 and include all costs for the preparation of the study of those areas, and WHEREAS, after thorough review of the proposals, it is the recommendation of the Public Works Committee and the Public Works Administration to award the contract for preparation of the Drainage Study to Quadra Engineering, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that a contract be awarded to Quadra Engineering, Inc. for —,preparation of the Drainage Study in the amount of $78,392. J PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day bf March, 1982. VINCENT OTREILLY, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, ity Clerk Approved by Finance: AMENDED AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 1982 - 7:00 PM /f PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Mr. & Mrs. John Stoehner - Change of Leases Rejected by Planning & Zoning Commission 2. Atty. Ted Carson - Small Boat Harbor 3. Joe Langston, City Cab Co. - Definition of City Licensing Structures 4. Jackie Russell - Coyles's Property C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda at Council Meetings 2. Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300 3. Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - Provide Monies for Alaska 1984 Participation 4. Resolution 82-22 - Transfer of Funds - Airport - Term. Renovation & Expansion - $55,388 5. Water & Sewer Rates 6. Transfer of Liquor License - Sam Pan Restaurant & Lounge D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1982 . E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title 29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning & { Land Use Regulations 2. DEC - Smoking in Public Places F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar & Harborview Restaurant 2. Library Renovation ,I E G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be hatified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Preparation of Plans & Specs for Airport Parking Lots - $30,500 4. Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing R(.,v/Appns - Preliminary Engineering & Preparation - Float Plane Basin - $5,300 5. Re -Evaluation of Latouche Island Resolution 82-3 6. Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill & City of Kenai Sludge Disposal 7. Discussion - Proposal for Re -Appraisal of Twenty City -Owned Lots H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17, 1982 - 700 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ••M1• w.pl'R1, •. v•�'_f, ,.�I [•)1W•M .'. A. ROLL CALL • -•�• •� irICxMM!:brsrlvawai 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Mr. i Mrs. John Stoehner - Change of Leases Rejected by Planning i Zoning Commission 2. Atty. Ted Carson - Small Scat Harbor _ ... 3. Joe Langston, City Cab Co. - Definition of City Licensing Structures C. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify Requirements for Adding Items to Agenda at Council Meetings 2. Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300 3. Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - Provide 't Monies for Alaska 1984 Participation �• _ �:;{^, . , s r'"`'-.:' 4. Resolution 82-22 - Transfer er of Funds - Airport �. Term. Renovation i Expansion - $55, 388 5. Water i Sewer Rates 6. Transfer of Liquor License - Sam Pan Restaurant - i Lounge • -{� D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1982 "' E. CORRESPONDENCE f• 1. Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title 29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning 6 „ Land Use Regulations 2. DEC - Smoking in Public Places F. OLD BUSINESS - :` ;,•• 1. Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar i Harborview Restaurant _ 2. Library Renovation G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Preparation of Plans 6 Specs for Airport Parking Lots - $30,500 4. Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Preliminary Engineering a Preparation - Float Plane Basin - $5,300 5. Re -Evaluation of Latouche Island Resolution 82-3 6. Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill 6 City of Kenai Sludge Disposal 7. Discussion - Proposal for Re -Appraisal of Twenty City -Owned Lots J H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk S. Finance Director 6. Planning s Zoning 7. Harbor Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO SE HEARD ADJOURNMENT KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES FEBRUARY 17, 1982, 7s00 PM KENAI CITY ADM INr:9TRA9•r0;4 uttIunria, MAYOR VINCENT O'REILLY PRESIDING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE _ A. ROLL CALL �r�• �a „N� Presents Dick Mueller, Tom Wagoner, John Wino, ncorit O'Reilly, Dotty Glick, Ron Malaton, Ray Measles Absonts None A-1 Agenda Approval 1. Mayor O'Reilly noted the amended agenda, adding item 8-4, Jackie Russell, Coylos's Property 2. Mayor O'Reilly asked that the PO for $4,550 for the Dale Carnegie course be added under item G-2, Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 Council approved the agenda as amonduu. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD B-1 Mr. i Mrs. John Stoohner - Change of Leases Rejected -^ by Planning i Zoning Commission �jeisr�hifa�rar bw John Stoohner spoke. They have 3 lots on airport land, one is used for tie down at the airport. They had Jrequested altering the lease on Lot 1, Block 3 to put a building on the lot. The building will be a 1, J opair shop, they will be doing work not presently done in Alaska. Permission was denied by PiZ. Councilman Wagoner said this industry is related to the airport by shipping. One of the most integral parts of the airport is the fishing industry. Council- man Wise asked Mr. Stoohner, how many tie downs did he have? Mr. Stoehner replied, 33 total, 15 are leased out. Councilman Wiso asked, why don't we have more tie downs? Mr. Stoohnor replied, they have either gone to other areas in the airport or to the Soldotna airport. Soldotna maintains a transient i parking area and is lower than Kenai tie downs. Mayor O'Reilly asked Mr. Stoohner, did he fool all procedures by Pit were adequate? Mr. Stoohnor replied, they went through proper procedures. He felt he did not empha- size enough the amount moved by air. It is paramount that he be stationed adjacent to the airport. Mr. Stoohnor referred to Atty. Dolahay's statement at ""°"'•"� P&Z that the leases are in contention and arrears. Ho was not prepared at that time to reply. From statements Atty. Dolahay trade, it was suggested they were not current, that is not true. They have not paid the increased rates on Lots 1 & 2, Block 2. They will be rectifying that and have asked for an extension till their attorney returns. Also, Lot 1, Block. 3 comes up for renewal and re -appraisal this year. Mayor O'Reilly nuked if they had looked at an alternate site near the airport that conforms to their use. Mr. Stoohner replied, the only one they have looked at, he thought had not been surveyed. This would be fairly convenient, but does not look at the problem of non -productive lands they have under lease now. They would be able to unload aircraft at the door if they had Lot 1, Block 3. Councilman Mueller asked, has he determined how he would use the building? tor. Stoohner replied, it would be split evenly between the 2 services. Mrs. Stoohner said the engine overhaul would be year round, the i UD K19`JAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 2 fish industry would only be used in the summer. Councilman Wagoner said the City needs to take a look at why people are leaving Kenai from general aviation. Public Works Director Kornolis spoke. Regarding industrial sites in the City and wastes. There is a possibility of a problem. We have never had a problem before. On the clamming process plant, we do not have much knowledge regarding this. Some times we can go from domestic to industrial waste but the torts may have to be changed. questions involved aros 1. volume of discharge 2, organic loading 3. Amount of suspended solids coming out of the plant PiZ suggested putting in a sand trap, this should be reviewed very closely. Councilman Wagoner said we might term this as industrial waste, but it is non- toxic and biodegradable. Every cannery on the Inlet has a permit to dump after some processing directly into the Inlet. MOTIONS Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller, to direct the City Manager to draw up a loans modification for Stoehners for Lot 1, Block 3. MOTION, Changes Councilman wagoner moved, with consent of second, to amend the motion to draw up a new lease and delete "lease modification." Councilman Wise said he would like to see a new lease rather than get into next year rate renewal. Atty. Delahay said an amendment can take that into consider- ation. Councilman Wise explained, this was set at the tie down rate, if set now, it would be considerably higher. MOTION, Amendments Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Malaton, to amend the motion to remand this back to Planning i Zoning for reconsideration for several items$ 1. Traffic generated. Do they have enough park- ing for employees? It should be considered as to zoning. 2. In the past Council has been critical of some leases that have been lot for non -aircraft re- lated uses. If we are going to do this, we should give guidelines to PLZ. 3. When PSZ considered this, Ergineer LaShot had discussed it with Stoehners, but did not have any information. This was just received tonight. Councilman Measles asked, what would 4 week's delay do to their work plans. Mrs. Stoehner replied it is extremely critical. They are 45 days from pro- cessing, work. period is April 1 to the end of Sept. They will not get a permit without the new plant. She added, regarding parking, most of their people are across the Inlet. 4 weeks is too long to wait. Councilman Mueller asked, how many people would be employed at the plant at one time? Mrs. Stoehner /0-- j KENAI CITY COUNCIL. FEB. 17, 1982 Page 3 ~._ replied, about 30. Councilman Malston asked Atty. Dolahay if he felt comfortable with the lease rates, .»....--..•,•.,�•..�--.• etc. Atty. Delahay replied he would feel comfor- table with the Stoohner proposal if they had asked in 1980 when the first letter was sent. They have . ..; . • ..., ,.... , ., never replied to the letters. He would not recommend any dealings until they come into compliance. He added, there is a question on airport related uses: 1. FAA says it must be public airport related uses. We should apply to FAA for any uses other than airport related. 2. Council has act policy that lands west of Willow and north of Main St. Loop be for airport uses. MOTION, Amendment to Amendments Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman chick, to draft a now lease to be brought to PaZ with additional questions and Administration contact FAA for release for this purpose and it be brought back to Council at the next meeting. Councilman Wise asked, what if we don't got an answer from FAA? Councilman Measles replied if we don't get an answer, we cannot do anything. �rXs+srrtao�f:tsr�s VOTE, Amendment to Amendments Motion passed, with Councilman Wine voting no. VOTE, Amendments Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. VOTE, Main Motion as Amondeds Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. B-2 Atty. Ted Carson - Small Boat Harbor Atty. Carson did not appear. B-3 Joe Langston, City Cab Co. - Definition of City Licensing Sturctures Joe Langston explained he bought the Cab Co, in Sept. He has been getting flak from the drivers regarding an unscheduled van in town. Till July 1980 this was governed by ATC. Since then they have given up all control. He has to live by the rules of the City of Kenai, he thinks they should also. He is requesting this be recommended to the Public Vehicle Commission or have a work session to review. Mayor O'Reilly noted the Public Vehicle Commission has limited powers for this and ATC has releaued control. There are no regulations regarding picking up and delivering people. Mr. Langston replied just local laws regarding where they could pick up. He felt they should also be put under the Public Vehicle Commission ordinance. There are people running schedule out to Phillips and to Carr's Mall. They have been observed picking up at the bars and other Places. Atty. Delahay noted there is no ordinance to cover this. Council will have to pass an ordinance to regulate this. If this is a private contractor, there is no reason why they can't. If it is scheduled run as a limousine, they have to stop at specified places. Police Chief Ross said he has not had a change to review this. He would like to have Atty. KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 4 Delahay, City Manager Brighton and himself review this before going to Public Vehicle Commission. «- r.w. -...., - .' r....... ... MOTION: Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman - Malston, to remand this to City Manager Brighton, Atty. Delahay, and Chief Ross to review and make recommendations of our current ordinance and what could be done to expedite these regulations. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. _ 0-4 Jackie Russell - Coyle's Property Ms. Russell distributed material relating to the discussion and explained a letter was delivered to _ City Manager Brighton and a meeting was held with -. the City Manager asking for right of lot refusal from the City. She noted this has been reviewed for about 20 years. The Coyles had hoped to make - a small boat harbor there, that is why the Coyles '; �:-: •::- : _. asked for City first right of refusal. The land has all the public facilities and has all easements. The owner reserves the right to all mines i minerals. In 1970 the preliminary plat was approved, it is still valid. They felt $15,000 an acre was a good price. The Coyle's value is at the low end of the scale. - She asked that the Mayor sign the letter, and they will hold on any sale for 30 days. Ccuncilman Wagoner suggested this go to Planning i Zoning and Harbor Commission and be returned for the Council meeting of March 3, 1982. Councilman Malston asked that the City Manager make a recommendation. Council agreed to the suggestion. MOTION: Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to authorize Mayor O'Reilly to sign the letter. Motion passed, with Councilman Mueller abstaining. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 755-82 - Amending KMC to Modify Require- ments for Adding Items to Agenda at Council Meetings .r; .i.fi,►+t ..-.. �r : �7! MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, to adopt the substitute ordinance. There was no public comment. MOTION, Amendment: Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to delete the paragraph after "Section 1:" and add, 1.15.040 Agenda: A draft agenda shall be prepared by the City Clerk under the supervision of the City Manager. Such draft agenda shall be distributed with supporting data to the Council and local media at the close of business on the Friday preceding the scheduled public formal Council meeting. On the next Monday the Council shall meet as a Committee of the Whole to, by concensus, establish the formal agenda for the scheduled public meeting. No further items shall be added to the agenda except by unanimous t�jif =�✓, consent of the Council present at the public meeting. r KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 5 Councilman Wise explained one Of the problems he has always had is that the agenda is a variety of inputs and hits Council on Friday without discussion of the issues. We have gone into prolonged debate over numerous items that Council has to act on. Amend- ments are added after the public has had public hearing. We should have a concensus of what we are going to have on the agenda. The Committee of the Whole would be round table, the media would be in- vited. Councilman Wagoner said he has trouble with any other night. He is not prepared to give up another night. Councilwoman Glick said she did not agree with 2 new meetings but she agreed any resolutions or ord- inances with substantial changes should be added to the next meeting. Vice Mayor Glick took the chair. MOTION, Amendment to Amendment: Mayor O'Reilly moved, seconded by Councilman Malston, to amend the motion to read, Section 1, line 3, the words "City Manager" be changed to read "Mayor." Mayor O'Reilly said he has discussed this with the Clerk, it is a question of practices and procedures that have grown up. The Clerk takes in items, discusses them with Administration and Council. The main thrust is any mayor gets alot of information from citizens, Administration and Council. Under the limited powers Of the Mayor, he is to keep matters of importance as he sees them to be put before Council. We have had a close agreement with the City Manager as to what should be on the agenda, but it should be up to the Mayor for final say-so. VOTE, Amendments ' Motion failed, with Councilman Wise voting yes. VOTE, Amendment to Amendment: Motion passed, with Councilman Wise voting no. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Wise, to amend the motion to read, Section 1, line 3, the word "Mayor" be changed to read "Mayor and City Manager." Motion passed with Councilman Wise voting no. MOTION, Amendment: Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Malston, to add Section II to the ordinance to read, "Any ordinance or resolution substituting amendments at public hearing may not be adopted at that meeting, but be held over for the next Council meeting for adoption." Councilman Mueller asked, what constitutes a sub- stantial change? That is an indefinite term. Council- woman Glick replied minor or grammatical changes or a dollar figure if incorrect, or adding a few: words. Councilman Measles said Council can determine by majority vote if it should be held over. KENAI CITY COO?ICIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 6 VOTE, Amendments Motion failed, with Councilmen Wise, Malston, Council- woman Glick voting yesi Councilmen Mueller, Wagoner, Measles, Mayor O'Reilly voting no. >..�•:•-tee VOTE, Main Motion as Amended: Motion passed, with Councilman Wise voting no. Mayor O'Reilly resumed the chair. C-2 Ordinance 756-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Overtime for Fire Dept. - $18,300 MOTIONS Councilman Mueller moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the ordinance. There was no public comment. Councilman wise said he would vote no, the reason was not that additional funding was riot needed, but he is unwilling to tap fund balance just because we are unable or unwilling to get it from the budget. Councilman Measles noted, this is based on call -out - procedures now in effect. were there call -out pro- cedures in effect at budget time? City Manager Brighton reFliud yes. Fire Chief Winston explained, irirja'±b^SZfii� e>a�41i3�7w we are dealing with an unknown. We usually base on the last 5 years, the lot 6 months of this year have been extremely heavy. Councilman Wagoner asked, what percentage of calls of people called out are ambulance as to fire? Chief Winston replied, 3 times as many ambulance as to fire. Councilman Wagoner noted, maybe we should become involved with area wide service area. Motion passed, with Councilmen Mueller, Wagoner, Malston, Measles, Mayor O'Reilly voting yes; Councilman Wise, Councilwoman Glick voting no. C-3 Resolution 82-21 - Transfer of Funds - Prcvide Monies for Alaska 1984 Participation Mayor O'Reilly said there was a meeting Feb. 18, 1982 of the Task Force. There was a small attendance. The lot meeting of the Task Force was enthusiastic, they decided to have a local celebration and not get too involved with the Statewide celebration. After the House action on pulling all funding, the committee decided to wait and see how the dust will settle. Council took no action on the resolution. C-4 Resolution 82-22 - Transfer of Funds - Airport Term. Renovation i Expansion - $55,388 MOTIONS �. Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller, to adopt the resolution. Councilman Malston asked, what is the $55,000 for? Finance Director Brown explained, the amendment to ,:he contract made on Jan. 20, 1982 meeting was to .extend as additional services. Councilman Malston safd he thought the figure discussed was $20,000. �- KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 7 MOTION: Councilman Malston moved to postpone action till the next meeting (3-3-82) for additional information and justification of the additional $50,000. Motion failed for lack of a second. City Manager Brighton said there was a •_ontract drafted in which these figures were in it, Council has agreed to the contract. Atty. Delahay said we are bound to pay this. Councilwoman Glick noted Councilman Malston was not at the meeting where this was adopted. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-5 water i Sewer Rates Finance Director Brown explained this was before Council at the Feb. 3, 1982 meeting. He was directed to advertise, this was dune. He noted one change on page 7, cesspool pumper charge. Councilman Wise said he felt it was necessary to pursue this in view - of the letters from the Borough regarding septage waste. He had asked Administration to review the document from CH2M Hill as to why they did not identify waste. He asked if Administration had heard from them. Public Works Director Kornelis replied yes, the letter was passed out this date (2-17-82). Councilman wise said he cannot see anyplace where they discussed charging for septage. He thought $10 was inadequate. Public Works Director Kornelis said in most places they are charging $20 for resident, $50 for non-resident. He noted over 75% of waste is handled in land fills. Our cesspool ordinance drastically needs changing. in the new plant it can be handled. MOTION: Councilman Mueller moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to approve the water a sewer rates as presented. Councilman Wise asked if these rates provide for the ability of the water i sewer fund to develop a re- serve for future capital needs? He added the capacity of the sewer plant exceeds the capacity of the water supply. City Manager Brighton replied the new sewer treatment plant at present is only using about 1/3 of capacity. we are using about 70% of water capacity at tFe present time. The facilities on line will accomodate for the next 7 or 8 years. Councilman Wise said he understood well i2 will need rehabilitation soon. If it means major use of funds, there is no money reserved for that. Government funds are no longer available. Public Works Director Kornelis said the well has been in operation for about 4 years, it is about time to pull the well and look at it. He had planned to put that in the budget. Councilman wagoner said he didn't think we are talk- ing about an item that is that big. MOTION, Amendment: Councilman Mueller moved, with consent of second, to add regulations to rates as presented. •.t:zu:s�.rr,.aue�cirr%saLsr,�e�riter�+Miririip 1 KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 8 Motion passed with councilman wise voting no. C-6 Transfer of Liquor License - Sam Pan Restaurant b Lounge Clerk Whelan explained the Sam Pan has requested renewal of their liquor license, Council had filed an objection because they owed approximately $12,000 to $15,000 in back taxes. This is a request for transfer of liquor license. Taxes still have not been paid, they have not filed for June through Dec. Atty. Delahay suggested Council send a 2nd letter of objection stating taxes are due and the transfer should be subject to payment of taxes. MOTION: Councilwoman Click moved, seconded by Councilman Malston, to send a letter of objection till all taxes are paid current. Motion passed, with Councilman Mueller voting no. D. MINUTES D-1 Regular Meeting, Feb. 5, 1982 Clerk Whelan asked that page 2, line 4, the name "Malston" be changed to "Baxter." Councilman Measles asked that page 4, item F-1, the motion be changed to read ft. instead of sq. ft. in lines 3,4 b 5. Councilman Mueller asked that page 11, last line, the word "changes" be corrected to read "charges." Minutes were approved as changed and corrected. E. CORRESPONDENCE E-1 Rep. O'Connell - Kenai Resolution 82-2 - Title 29 Amendments Regarding Platting, Planning b Land Use Regulations Council took no action. E-2 DEC - Smoking in Public Places Atty. Delahay said this does not apply to cities. F. OLD BUSINESS F-1 Liquor License Application - Rainbow Bar b Harborviow Restaurant Mike Baxter, Rainbow Bar, spoke. He noted last week he asked Council to rescind their protest on the basis that he was current in current taxes. He found out this date (2-17-82) that he had not paid one pay- ment. He wished to withdraw his request and thank the Council. He added he is concerned about several thousand businesses that are delinquent and h'_s type of business is the only one being made public and closed. Atty. Delahay said Mr. Baxter's withdrawal makes the question moot. Ile added, in addition to not being current, he owes about $11,000 he owed from one year ago. lie. made 2 payments and stopped. The Borough intends to maintain their objection. He felt the City should back up the Borough and maintain their objection. Councilman wagoner said is he comes r- 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL PER. 17, 1982 Page 9 up and pays current taxes he didn't see why we should object. The judgement on the note has nothing to do with his being able to operate his business if he pays up current. Atty. Delahay explained one of the conditions of the note was that if the note was not paid, the Borough would object again. The judge- ment was given for failure to pay taxes. Councilman Wise said the point raised by Mr. Baxter that they •are the only businesses that are put up to public scrutiny when not paying their taxes is a concern. He suggested the City press the Borough to inform us of those in non-conformance with taxes so we can publicize them. Councilman Wagoner said he agreed and we should ask the Borough what they are doing about this. Councilwoman Glick said we have asked the Borough about this every year. They said the print out would help but it has not. Atty. Delahay explained they just put the sales tax into the com- puter. There may also be a problem with revealing because of Borough ordinances as to confidentiality. No further action was taken. '7- P-2 Library Renovation Carmen Gintoli was not in attendance, so the matter was postponed to the March 3, 1982 meeting. G. NEW BUSINESS G-1 Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, to approve the bills as submitted. Councilman Wise asked if this was poisonous urethane in the Pine Arts bu!'ding. Public Works Director Kornelis replied he was sure the inspector would not lot it be anything bad. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. G-2 Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 MOTIONS Councilman Malston moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller, to approve the requisitions and include bill for the Dale Carnegie course. Motion passed, with Councilmen Mueller, Wise, Malsron, Measles, Mayor O'Reilly :•oting yes; Councilman Wagoner, Councilwoman Glick voting no. G-3 Ordinance 757-82 - Increasing Rev/Appno - Prepar- ation of Plans & Specs for Airport Parking Lots - $30,500 City Manager Brighton said Council is providing funds for projects we may not have funds for the next 2 or 3 years. Our policy has been to provide for items we may have in the relatively near future. This is #16 on the list. To make appropriations is too soon and we have in-house people to do the work. He suggested Council not appropriate this and the float plane basin. We have requests from ADAP for over $5 Million. We have asked the State for capital improvement funds in addition for $8 Million. rf - .si�fAtarwilllt!!_AYAL�.RS!:MyLWrwtlt� %��jry�4rtr�'�l�:isf{).� �So.^�ij✓y*r A� KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 10 If we adopt these resolutions, we are totally changing the Capital Improvment Project and reyuestinq over $10 Million to ADAP. MOTIONt Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to refer the resolution to the Airport Committee and see if we can do it in-house. Councilman Wise said this is more than he anticipated. The City is programming $2 Million for the terminal and has a lousy parking lot. The City hes about $400,000 in 2 airport funds in unappropriated fund balance. We should do what we can to improve the airport. VOTEt Motion passed, with Mayor O'Reilly voting no. G-4 Ordinance 758-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Prelimin- ary Engineering t Preparation - Float Plana Basin - $5,300 Council agreed to refer this to Airport Committee also. G-5 Re -Evaluation of Latouche Island Resolution 82-3 Mayor O'Reilly explained while he and City Manager Brighton were in Juneau, they had a discussion with Sen. Dankworth, he said he would send additional information. Mayor O'Reilly said he thought Council would like to re-evaluate on the basis of the addit- ional information. Councilman Mueller said this is building a recreation spot for the wealthy. Council- man Wagoner said Prince William Sound is not the place for little boats. If he is looking for a place to open for small boats, he is doing a disservice. Vice Mayor Glick took the chair. Mayor O'Reilly said he had no comments pro or con on Points raised by Sen. Dankworth or Councilman Wagoner. But he believes we are missing the point. We have a policy that we don't comment on capital improvement projects of other cities in our district. Here we are commenting on something from another district. It is fine to comment personally but by having a resolution we are putting the city credibility on the line. That is a privilege a Council person cannot enjoy. It is evident there is waste in the capital improvement projects the State goes through. We are entitled to object, but he doesn't think we can sit as Council and cause damage to the City's interest. The reverse will be somewhere someone else will start passing judgement on our proposals. He didn't think we would welcome criticism in that regard. Sen. Dankworth has been cooperative on our capital improvement projects and our thoughts on revenue sharing. This does not create an atmosphere where our beat interests are being expressed. Council- man Wagoner said this is not in Sen. Dankworth's district either, we were asked by the people of that district to make a statement. Maybe we should start making a comment on pork barrel. Maybe Sen. Dankworth will cut us off at the pockets, but it is not his either. There were no public hearings on this, it was not requested by the constituency. Councilman Wise said we should let the matter die as is. It will be more -an ■ M KENAI CITY COUN71L !i FEB. 17, 1982 Page 11 demeaning to rescind now. But if we submit to black- mail, that is unpalatable to him. Mayor O'Reilly said he was not saying blackmail. lie didn't think we lose anything by changing our minds. Sen. Dank - worth assured us it would not have a tangible effect on funding. But our job is not to stand in judgement ion State matters. Why should we pass judgement on our capital improvement projects and at the same time passinqhcould runncilmanat couldrightfully cometo theCity. Councilman Wagoner said he hopes that our capital improvement projects can come up to scrutiny better than Latouche project. City Manager Brighton said he hopes none of his remarks will be detrimental to what may come from the State. This is a part of the process. Council at last budget sersion spent large amounts of monies for lobbying. This was used for trips to Juneau to convince the legislators that what we were asking was legitimate and acceptable by the public. Our capital i improvement projects will be a result of conference committees. To offend, for whatever reason, any in- dividual that has power to cut us off at the pass is totally illogical and not too responsible to the people you represent. If you as individuals want to make points, there is nothing wrong, but when you express it as a City Council member and it may be damaging to our City, it is foolhardy. If his friends need our $7 Million, that could be the case. He assured the Mayor our position would not be an influence on his decisions, but he thought it was tongue in cheek. If we appropriate money for lobbying what we have done on Latouche could undo all we have done. MOTION: Mayor O'Reilly moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller, to rescind Resolution 82-03. ^ Councilman Wagoner said this is not a personal attack cf his, he proposed the resolution. We were asked by Cordova and that was why he made the resolution. Councilwoman Glick said all we are asking for is reconsideration, that is not too much to ask for that much money. Mayor O'Reilly resumed the chair. I ; VOTES Motion failed, with Councilman Mueller, Mayor O'Reilly, voting yes; Councilmen Wagoner, Wise, Malston, Measlev, Councilwoman Glick voting tea.- ,v) O G-6 Discussion - Kenai Peninsula Landfill 6 City of Kenai Sludge Disposal City Manager Brighton eyplained this was a series of communications. Since we have a new product to dispose of, we have not had this in the past. At the present time we have no place to dispose of it. We asked the Borough to dispose of it. In the interim a letter was sent out protesting the 5 year renewal of the landfill. The Borough Mayor wrote back, this letter is in the packet. we do not have permission to dispose of our sludge in the landfill and the Borough does not have permission to dispose of septic waste in our sewer treatment plant. Councilman Wise asked if we got a reply from DEC on our protest. City Manager Brighton replied no. Councilman Wise J` ,' - , •; �:• j= said the Borough has assumed landfill Borough wide. FP '. ■ I KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Pale 12 They are not in accordance with the law by not tak- inq sludge. Councilman Wagoner asked, how much sludge per month? Public works Director Kornelis replied ••�*�— about 1 truck load per week. Councilman Wagoner noted it could be burned. Mr. Kornolis said it to good fertilizer. It looks like coffee grounds. He didn't think there would be any problem disposing of it as fertilizer. Mayor O'Reilly asked, they can accommodate? Mr. Kornelis replied, they can take it, but it is a political matter now. Mayor O'Reilly asked if wp have tried to deliver a load. Mr. Kornelis replied they have to make preparation, we have not. Councilman Wagoner said before we do that, we should press with DEC for compliance. Councilman wise suggested we set up a system of rebate for residents of the City for septic tanks. City Manager Brighton ;:. said the letter from CH2M Hill said the amount was based on septage within the City only. It was not designed to handle that kind of septage. The attorney has to determine if the Borough has the right to refuse us. Councilman Wagoner said he is not in - favor of taking from outside the City without an ord- inance saying we will not take from outside the City if we do not have the capacity, so the Borough does not ask us to increase our capacity. Councilman Measles said he didn't think it will handle the City and outside the City. Mr. Kornelis said outside dumpers have not used our facilities for 2 or 3 years. . we will have to see whether we can handle our own residents. City Manager Brighton asked, how much do we have on hand to dispose of? Mr. Kornelis replied, one truckload a week. we are putting it in a small holding area. Councilman Wise said the situations ignored are: 1. The City is taking outside :caste water now. We are providing a facility now, that is ignored. 2. when this was proposed, the City was willing to • enlarge their receiving tank provided the extra cost was borne by the Borough. The Borough agreed. we were to be guaranteed to cover the cost if there was a shortfall. He thinks the Borough Administration was willing to proceed but were shot down by the pumper dumpers. The problem is the Borough's, not the City's. City Manager Brighton noted Council cannot take action till the Atty. makes a determination. Also, - Administration will have to go to DEC to make a determination on us dumping there or if they can legally prohibit us. Then we will have to make a decision. r 7 Discussion - Proposal for Ito -Appraisal of acnty City -Owned Lots City Manager Brighton said there are 20 leases that are up for renegotiation. We got proposals from 5 appraisers, and received 2 replies. Before Council takes action, they should know, we have spent 4 years dealing with FAA on disposing of lands. Vie have had 5 requests for purchase of land in the last 8 weeke. The appraisals have increased so much that they have turned us down. Mr. Brighton cited some examples. He added, if appraisals come in at those rates, we will have lease holders on our door. The market value is wrong if none of the lots sell. Councilman Meuller said there have been real inconsistencies in appraisals in both directions. It appears the appraisers are leading the market rather than following it. Mr. Brighton said Council should be ready for irate leaseholders when they get their ■ KENAI CITY COUNCIL FEB. 17, 1982 Page 13 reappraisal. Councilman Mueller said there is practi- cally no land in the private sector to compete with the City. The way things are going, they could go out Kalifonsky or North Road for much less. Council- man Malstcn suggested a work session regarding this. He added Council should ask 2 appraisers to the session and other realtors and land developers. It should be done within the next 30 flays. Councilman Mueller suggested Council ask - appraisers from Anchorage to sit in to lend their information. H. REPORTS H-1 City Manager None H-2 City Attorney None H-3 Mayor Mayor O'Reilly spoke. 1. There are vacancies on some commissions. He suggested: Planning i Zoning - Hal Smalley Harbor Commission - Tommy Thompson (M.W.) Recreation Commission - Roger Seibert Debbie Town (student rep.) MOTIONs Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, for approval of the nominees as submitted. Motion passed by unanimous consent. Mayor O'Reilly asked Clerk Whelan to notify the nominees. 2. Mayor O'Reilly had a talk with Rep. O'Connell this date (2-17-82). They discussed the capital improvement projects. He is well aware of Kenai's interests on CIP. The municipal sharing attitude is good, it will be at fairly full levels. 3. By Code, the Mayor is required to appoint the acting -acting City Clerk. Mayor O'Reilly suggested Janet Loper. MOTION: Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Mueller to approve the nomination. Motion passed by unanimous consent. Clerk Whelan was asked to notify Mrs. Loper. H-4 City Clerk None H-5 Finance Director None r � � 4 w KENAI CITY COUNCIL, 1 FEB. 17, 1782 Page 14 H-6 Planning & Zoning Councilwoman Glick had no report. Mayor O'Reilly asked about action at the Borough regarding planning i zoning powers. Councilwoman Glick replied an ordinance was passed for zoning only if we choose to do this. She will bring it to the next City P&Z meeting. H-7 Harbor Commission Councilman wagoner said they had a meeting with Norlek and will meet with. TAM Feb. 23, 1982 and bring a report back to Council. They are now looking at the set net fishermen. I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Councilman wagoner spoke. MOTIONS Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to direct City Manager Brighton, in drawing up the budget, to exclude all capital equipment from the budget. Only capital equipment should be that of a replacement nature. Any item should be on a separate list, justification and prioritized and brought to Council. City Manager Brighton asked if the replacement program such as police vehicles are acceptable. Councilman Wagoner replied yes, any new item expanding equipment is separate. Motion passed by unanimous consent. 2. Councilwoman Glick said there will be an all - day meeting on resource development on Feb. 20, 1982. Council is invited. 3. Councilman Wagoner asked Mayor O'Reilly about the letter from Dr. Barton regarding support of the University. Haf will make comments and give them to the Mayor. 4. Councilwoman Glick said the meeting of the Airport/ Real Estate Committee and the Public Worke Committee was on the TO DO list. Council agreed to have the meeting Wednesday, Feb. 24, 1982 upstairs at 700 PM. S. Mayor O'Reilly noted the invitation from InletVisions for Saturday, Feb. 27, 1982. 6. Mayor O'Reilly noted the letter regarding upgrading of Candlelight. He asked Public Works Director Kornelis to bring this to the next meeting. (3-3-82) ADJOURNEMNT Meeting adjourned at lls45 PM. (i r14xt /."-00 net Whelan, City C Clerk KENAI CITY COUNCIL January 20, 1982 Verbatim Translation G-1 - Bills to be Paia, Bills to be Ratified (Peninsula engineering Considered Separately) John Wise - I move for payment of Peninsula Engineering in the amount of $7,274. Ray Measles - Second. Vince O'Reilly - Councilman Wise John Wise - We have a memo dated - a letter dated the 13th on the some six change orders to that particular project tonight. I can't really make - it's in narrative form but no opinions and I just wonder what the Administration feeling is - did the engineer perform in accordance with the contract or were there some significant errors and omissions in view of the quantities and numbers involved? Bill Brighton - Keith, do you want to address that or not? I --- Vince O'Reilly - This is change order #3 you're talking about specifically? John Wise - It appears to be the major:problem. Vince O'Reilly - OK Vince O'Reilly - (inaudible) G-6 (inaudible) Keith Kornelis - Attached to the letter of January 13 is a copy of each one of the change orders with the exception of the two future change orders. Change order #5 and change order 96, coming before Council at a later, crate. These change orders of course are with the contractor and not with Peninsula Engineering. Change order #3 deals with quite a few different items. I imagine the item that John is referring to is the over - excavations - overrun on the excavations, which amounted to 1 1 approximately 10,000 yards. I believe the engineer simply made an arithmetic error in his calculations on the bidding of the thing. That's just my personal guess. He would have put in the total amount of excavation which is approximately 13,000 cubic yards. And in the bid Quality Asphalt Paving would still have been the low bidder. I did - or I should say - Jack did an analysis for us up here using this in blue being the bid that was given - using the estimated quantities of the contractor bid. In other words using 4,000 cubic yards excavating. Quality, of course, was the low bidder at this amount. If we take those quantities with the over -excavation in them, Quality would still be the low bidder. Although as you notice here there's quite a bit of difference between the next bidder and Quality in this case, whereas the gap narrows considerably here. The reason being, I feel, is Quality Asphalt Paving is very thorough on their analysis on the quantities prior to the bidding. It's a game that bidders play. I used to play it quite a bit - you go through your quantities and you figure out where you're going to be - have possible overruns or underruns. And, if you have a possibility of getting an overrun on the project, you try to bid that project higher than you normally would, making up the difference in other items in your bid so that you're still low. If you'd like, I can sorta give you an example of what I'm talking about. Unless you understand it, and I won't do that. Man (Unknown) - Sure. Keith Kornelis - OK. I'll attempt to, I'm not - this is just an example. I did use some of the quantities and unit prices are similar to what we had (inaudible) in the bidding. This upper part above this line here is the bid that was based on the original estimated quantities like when we went out to bid. I just chose four major items of the bid. We had approximately one acre of clearing with a quantity - 4,000 cubic yards of excavation, 28,000 tons of backfill and 17,000 square yards of paving. Now the contractor looks at that and does a thorough analysis of his bidding procedures and he finds that the engineer has - or he feels there's going to be an overrun. As in this case, the excavation. He'll bid that at quite a bit higher than the other items. Now in doing so -he has to be careful that he - . if he bids that higher - that he can still get the job. So he's going to have to lower his bid on other items in his bidding procedure in order to still come out as the low bidder and get 2 the job. In this particular case, Quality bid $8.00 a square yard on that excavation. The next bidder in line was $4.00 a yard, which is half of that amount. So it's pretty apparent Quality caught that mistake. He bid $8.00 a square yard. This is just sort of an example, of what could happen. Here's Bidder A, Bidder B. Bidder A bid 5,000 acre clearing, $8.00 a yard excavation, and 4,000 - $3.00 a ton and 28,000 tons of backfill, $8.90 and 17,000 yards of paving. Multiply the figures, 4,000 x 8, 28,000 x 3, you come up with this amount. The total of $272,300. He's the low bidder. Compared to B. B bids $3500 an acre, $2.50 - quite a bit lower, as you can see, which is probably more realistic at that 4,000 yards for $10,800. He bids higher, of course, again, on the backfill and the paving because this gentleman over here - he has to cut back somewhere. He's cut back, a little bit on these other items. So, anyway, Bidder B comes out higher than Bidder A. Now when you get down to the actual construction, and supposing Bidder A is correct - you come out with actual quantities - 13,000 square yards. Just assuming the other quantities stay the same. Here's where he makes his killing - $8.00 a square yard multiplied times 13,000 cubic yards, you get $104,000. Bidder B, his $4.00 a yard times 13,000 is only 35,100. You add these totals up - same unit prices, of course, just a larger unit here. Lo and behold, Contractor B comes out as the lower bidder but he didn't get the job. What he's done - what's happened here is Quality looked at the quantities, found the error, and took advantage of it. Now, in this particular case though, after doing an analysis we find that Quality still would have been low. They went so low on their original bid they left a lot on the table. And so there's quite a bit of a buffer there. And they still came out low in the actual quantities. Again, they had to go back to the other items and cut back. Now where they made - where Quality made quite a bit of money was that they sub -contracted out their excavation and I understand that their excavating sub -contractor was paid like $4.00 a yard which was in line with all the other bidders and Quality possibly was making $4.00 a yard just handling the paperwork. Anyhow, no matter what happened, even if there was a mistake, we would have had to pay for that extra excavation. The question is, how much did it amount to on this. Nobody will ever know that factor except for Quality themselves, because they're the ones that shuffled the bid. They balanced - they moved the quantities around. It would be a very - an extremely hard thing to do to try to prove how much money, if any, it cost the City because of that (inaudible). Vince O'Reilly - And that's due to any engineering making a rather gross error? Keith Kornelis - Right. I can't say that professionally he made an error. I mean, professionally meaning his design work. I think he just slipped - just made an arithmetic error, you know, like somebody was adding or subtracting their checkbook. I don't think that - and I'm sure he doesn't feel that there was a mistake somewhere in the way it was figured. I mean the way we figure cubic yards on the excavation or something. He just - I think - I'm sure he just feels there was just an arithmetic error. Professionally -wise I don't think I have a problem (inaudible). He just slipped up. That's just my opinion. I don't want to go on record saying that that's exactly what happened. Vince O'Reilly - All right. Keith Kornelis - We went over this change order though. Again, all these change orders have been approved so this is the second time around on them. Because this is the final bill for Peninsula Engineering I - that's why - and John requested this. Vince O'Reilly - Councilman Wagoner. Tom Wagoner - I myself, I'm not an engineer, but I think he made a professional mistake. I don't see how anybody could engineer a project like that and have to go in and re -engineer it because of the elevation that he came up with the initial time that created the amount of drainage problems that we're going to have with the water out behind the Post Office in some of these areas. I think he made a gross error. John Wise - That's the other part of that same change order (inaudible). Tom Wagoner - That's right. I think he did make a very large error and I think it was grossly made and I don't think we should pay him another nickle. Keith Kornelis - I was referring to the excavation. 4 0 Tom Wagoner - Yeah, I realize that (inaudible). Keith Kornelis - Now, a couple of other things - maybe I should point out - if it's relevant or not. He was relieved of the duties of inspection on the project and although he was not relieved of some of the testing and surveying, so he continued on with that portion of it. We had to - as everybody knows - we had to hire an inspector to complete the project, because statement #7 here included in the package shows that he went over - besides the 7,000, which is the retainage that we keep, $11,145 and I don't recommend paying that at all. That's (inaudible). He does have an outstanding bill to McLane and Associates, although McLane and Associates has a check in their possession, but they're going to hold it till they got final payment - till Peninsula Engineering got final payment from the City. That was an agreement that he had with McLane. The way I understand it. Betty Glick - (inaudible) John Wise - You mean it's rubber right now. Keith Kornelis - OK. Pardon? John Wise - You mean it's rubber right now. Keith Kornelis - Probably. Normally, in most cases in construction projects we call for a release of claims (inaudible) liens. In this particular case because I knew we were - according to the construction contractor - in this particular case because I knew we were having some financial problems with the project - I knew he was having some financial problems with the project - I should say - I contacted some of the sub -contractors - the testing outfits, McLane and that. Actually McLane also has been contacting me. And there's a good portion of that amount of money that was owed that Peninsula Engineering owes - like McLane Surveying. And before we would release the money to him I wanted to make sure that his sub -contractors were paid. So I required an engineer's release, which is in here. And the only way, of course, that he would give me that was to make some kind of arrangements with McLane saying that his bill would be paid. And I think probably what John is saying is probably correct. The check is waiting - it's probably waiting - J :I -------- - - - rM the account is waiting for our funds to go into Peninsula Engineering's account (inaudible) so that the check is good. Vince O'Reilly - And with that, Council? Councilman Wise, we have a motion before us. John Wise - I did not get into the grade change. Councilman Wagoner and the rest of Council were here at the time. I am concerned - and I don't necessarily disagree, but I just wasn't here and I don't know the details. I am concerned over the excavating over on - and not wishing to make a big point of it - but I think professionalism requires good arithmetic. And I - if an arithmetic error was made that's certainly a professional reflection on someone who's doing this type of work. I have a great deal of difficulty in accepting the magnitude of that particular change order. Even though it appears that there wasn't a (inaudible) review of the other bids that the City didn't particularly get hurt. But I have a great deal of difficulty in paying a professional for what I consider non-professional work. And therefore I cannot support the payment that has been requested here. Tom Wagoner - Call for the question. Vince O'Reilly - What happens if we don't pay this bill? Anybody know? What happens if we don't pay this bill? Betty Glick - He doesn't get his money. Vince u'Reilly - I don't know - I have no idea. Councilwoman Glick. Betty Glick - well, I have trouble accepting all this too. And I am not a professional engineer, but it just seems to me that there were a number of other items in this whole engineering process on this particular project that leaves a whole lot to be desired. And another item that of course was, I think, a matter of a change order was the fact that the City Hall facility was already designed and showed - I believe a 2" water line from the City Hall facility out to the main and when the Fidalgo Subdivision project was designed it was only showing a 3/4" hook- up to the City Hall facility and I think that ended up costing us extra money, didn't it? 6 Keith Kornelis - We installed it ourselves (inaudible). Betty Glick - But --- John Wise - (inaudible) Betty Glick - The contractor would have done it, there were several thousands of dollars involved there, was there not? Keith Kornelis - Yeah, he submitted a cost estimate that I thought was excessive and we went in and aid it ourselves. I don't know - I can't remember exactly. We were thinking about hooking in over at the other way, weren't we Carmen? Carmen Gintoli - I think you're talking abut the Recreation (inaudible) Betty Glick - Ho --- Carmen Gintoli - We did - the City did install it (inaudible) ourselves but there was also similar problems at the Recreation (inaudible). ,11 Betty Glick - OR. Keith Kornelis - Maybe that is (inaudible). Betty Glick - Well, that could be but wasn't there a difference in the design of the water line? �I Carmen Gintoli - (inaudible) the City (inaudible). Betty Glick - OR. And also there was the problem at the Recreation facilities. So there are a number of things here that, as I stated early on, that to me leaves a whole lot to be desired. Vince O'Reilly - We have a motion before us. Further discussion. The question's been called for. Clerk, call the roll. Motion failed, with Councilman Mueller voting yes; Councilman Malston absent; Councilmen Measles, Wagoner, Wise, Mayor O'Reilly, Councilwoman Glick voting no. PlIet Whelan, City Clerk Fi ■ ■ February 24, 19H2 Mr. :.'am Best, Plat:r.ing Director Kenai Peninsula Borough Pose 9 SO Solaotaa, Alaska 99659 Dear Mr. Lazt, This is fu rezrohse to your request that the local utility COmpar.ias nrov"e emvr,3nts and suggestions its coarection with utility location: problems in public right s•-of-.ray. Our own axperiouce i:. this area has been reasonably rood iss recent years. iAWfzVor, for Nur cci,zic:zxation, ',•:± afc�r t' C f01-13Iijig comAentsr 1. ;;e ,enarally attempt to locate our plant installations accordis.,? to r:•I., atanaards proposed t-•1 the Borou;h in 1971. Occasioltallf ,:e will fine: Lis:.t anotller utility ir:stallation has alrim!y hem made ir& our assigncu lacstiou. Triz is gmarall•, -, ra4ui= of as. c•xistiu•, ob3trscs.<:. zc:c a3 a buried lc7 gi:a IeEr by the •!m21c,7,;r -7 :Ii_• cor. tractor. irr.ilari. , ;Jz :rrsy ba ►curd it. tau space allocates to us, forcir:q us to ct.,rr.ya our location or null Of! t a ;ob. ZI, .si:her w's3 t :s r sull: is that me or more utility installations ar•i i:o* iIs the zpecifieJ iocj�cion. We are I.0 ! 1:arri'llar c. ' c•:_rr:i:tom ..•:.z.3ivisions bat a fir.: r quire•rent i::aurinq "clo-au" rignta-of-way woull be of great banafit jr. 2. Tie sug?ertion loads iI. vrur 7ebruary 22 meatil.a t.,j t the rich►;-of-r%+.q widths s1louIC. "c� ir.creas..: is a va1J :.::. additirral 10 :ear _ of cleared right-of-way would be of value it. raducil.g _t•.e cor. gestior. I.o+ 6. x ;tracts. T,•^ic31 .:rcaA Iectt Ira'+. 3 ^.at on .taper Lut fiala co..ditions co ..ot 31.caya !::rtri- ;trice ' 4 '• 1.11 '••:it I7 ;'permit zysten" 1:3 t:o+: the solution to rroblem3 within the FUSCO S•?-':ico aroa, ^articular:{ airica c:io City . e r2.{uirazt u3 +.o obtain a 1—Mmit prior to :naki"q ar:y installation. There is it li:ai* as to wit it may reasonably r•9 jxpected of a utility in tha wzy of accountability to •i. s : ,I ious kcal f1�; •:,• :1 agRncias. r:•: r, Ar., «, 19A2 �. Xr. aam Best, Planning Director. Psge 4. A very - for concern at nresent ir the advent of cable television, aervice to ti* o � %ai/Caleotr a are.a. In our opinion the i,.itallatior, ct facilit•ine to provide this service will nncompacs a «ramendous anouat of work to be performed withir, a ahorr ti.r.:e frame .rid has the likely effect cF creat•in.7 zariouc; orithii, the already crowded riches -of -way. This tsudsrtmkina is inninant as evidenced '.-v the Certifivatior, tiE:.r:t,g.s acceduic:: ::y the Uasf-a rL]ic r't•ilitias Commission to co=ence on March 2, 1982. It is our belief that the notetitial for serious conflict with exictir,g utility it.stallat•.ions may not be receiving appropriate attn_r Lion from ri:c aR.ancf.e4 having jurisdiction over our ri-hts-of-Dray. If we are in error in this feelira it is }:ecause •:e h ve heard or no plats for resolving aucn conflicts or for rev{.;ir.., �,•or'cah? !c «.+^T,a "cr t•':� tas*. allaf_iou of Tae remarks made herein are not intenuled to he in any way critical of anyones involsnf, in :%tility pIart location ',uf %re off -red in a sincere attem. t ro tninirtize sane of the orohlems inherent in the operation of - ut•ili'.,v %lart •otrleir cur comnunit!. ^',!a k you for the aoportanity f.•A '7'7 ant. ram_ c'pry tr•ily �-ours, 7?3" I U IL:.-l' SLRVIC : Oscar L. Th�7as, vice-Fra;irien* •• OtOT/r l%-? cr,: Ma ror J. Vincent 0' P.eilly City of Kenai r r - AlACCAJEAN dDKINS 2 19-82 BOX 461, Cdva y9574 Gentlemen s ; ;Z 2, . 2 2MY . I am assumeing Kenai is coaching uncMYjr tfie�ba}ae « " regarding LaTouche Island. presEure I can only say...."fly out to the Sound rn*Jan, book at Latouche....look at the Bay on Lvans WslanJ across the ' c e?•i—Compare." Walk down the street and talk to the man on the street and ask his views of dropping that kind of $, for that place, for a aandfull. It is pREJSATLn. t does not serve 000,000 but a handful of the population. I would fully endorse, in the future when needed, a harbor development at the "right location". Even if Chugach Natives parent co selects land....then it is in Conflict with Chenega Corp, one of its groups, which s "rebuilding" across on Evans Island, in a sheltered, natural, deep water harbor" and again years away before the kind of dollars would be justified. 43,000,000 was the orig. appropriation. Now we hear w 05,000,000 and $10,000,000 the possible fitures.... plus, hydro, airport funds, N.AILTAtJf3JME, '.IAGI.;, I2JSURAJICE on and on. with Cordova gettiu,; $6,Op0,00p in 19dl.....and Latouehe (with 2 people year around) getting :;3,000,000....ard waat did Kenai, other places get? Is this fair....? At a time when Alaska must $'slash and cut".... r Q• t h7 ueTe n tail" and justify this? , ,, ceXours, ��1 J.ns 1� Q 0 - /�;1 � pot I 'a G . ♦7-�7 r.u. ram u / sir}��.�_^�!.�..�.I�• i�sv—�• jr 2i �.♦}�}r� � • • : :. .'- '-:•'�'. .._...•j t r: _. .. j � • • � .': r+�.+ 4j71�`.-?iN r'•'�+lq`.%s�'.�a!'cn ' _•',tnL'�'�'�,�..,_,,�yy�� y��j%:��..��r� •i/.:.-,�.. F M PS....and frankly....I don't like to have to bu,7 the Isoabel Pass Camp from our of our own State flaps, when he should be down there helping us. I am not saying anything at all is improper .... it just sits wrong. When a Judge takes office, his business is put in trLat, Whon a man takes office, he automatically "gains" just thru public image and contact.., and when he says "he is concerned he is loosing out because of his position".:...perhaps he ibc needs to end his State position and ' concentrate on making money. 40� biQi��s�iNiK .r '�4s::�s5 ': ••f«-• °�;�.iti,+.:r:: ,."�'., s'�•-'.{:.:. ... _ '. sfi,'?ir.i '.:i•..' �,�V " .� ,'��i/•(��tA'!' , ii• y..; .rl.; s l. .. i efj•Y; aN" :'.1 :1: •i•kt�� +•�i!�P�'%Hri1I= '. �J _ 1k:1:�'. tL:w�J..' � .. _ . . • ...,... � . � t:7t 7�...�i+. "''••i�ft�"ii.i /� `IC@6TT �! A /.. ^..., �iA•��,/ ;r ., y: 'P'J � JY�)r .,;, ,f yp+ ,r /!y •J "'^"{�,�T�� fr'�:'Y';,t ,• � r. p_ irs,•(,"t.,i .a;. ,��. j:'• s ,yy�� ,r,,�.�, ,�• '�0! ,tG�'�'rr'•1.,•. Lr'. , •i.r i, j:r'%,�. i'di',i'. `'r.'ry•'+I • ,�..�•,'.. .QCr:'tj�• S?11w r • (»!� J•/, /�; `y.' �„ :' 1; tlAiyH;Y '`!�' la�.r a,� .'f .ri�,"1:'ll,t:�''; / ... �;y ' ;r, � A 'I f: s' :t�1+�' L,,ct�;' /'� 1),.(,/S" a}1/t" r'"•,,,rlJr• .J,,. ,�+X i'i,;r �" ' . ,y!.,,;1 y,. .�•• �I'. ra w' dr� � . i:• !,fib' 1'� �,,r•. ,�•.dr�Nli; a:��.r /:; �i'..a''�'• � •1'.i f '�•. •{,!i k;�„'. y i��n s � •G•r. 1.•L�•1'r •7,, {..',h,;'"'T, .- •.L•*. 2�v.. r•V5•,y ;!��tJ;�X' .. r'"'1 Nh, r(zrJ' ,i ix�r,'1A!i'0 {�'/ y.'n• ..i i ' 1 '}.' le o.1"�,.�s • , i ,J •,r•:`d'1,'��[' / ; ��i y�•�i,'t y 1�••. pn�� rJ! r. ;fjr �;",fi'i'•tirrP r apt <} w� S .tr�g7r{ �lll�JG ` )�WJ _AC G.. 4-T !iN.,,spti: ,.K * �'7,ir ✓, � D 4tionjicrVf aierreri er .d ;�•g�(n ��.�ti,:�r4it'.,y�, •J:M�t:`,{�1,.• I .., ..YS,•'i .i ... •,, •t...• .. ypJ f•)L ��'• i. .,:'�1', ,�!/• `S:I '(' �h �•,�Bii J; ri .1�{'i.,�,.✓ (�tfl,r 7•�,,, ;'h`..`'J} . - %M", 1•t efF'•'.,�'br '�Fd�••r• / /„•�:'' to ��l oii,: l�:"ply �Ris,, vAll •./L[ Ups VJ 1i,Q� th LVVY��W.��., t$1/ELt?P IT 'dua;T0.� uv,-•-loaat, ,Fv=. Eimict1r?orrAL'LOI DITZOII�i�`+�i��tdticke4`' '�"►' ��`��''' ' land ,''�t e8:it'u»reasibLe to conoti'uct a harbor r r J)t, , q all'-P.�! n:.aadiAt • ., :;�,• .: lji,••/ j••j �,l R;��: 11-4.,t./L�c 'C •Ff, A, ,J. i. J �' fn,J I •y 'J•1 I'��,'{. ��- �� Y.,� `•` Y �'u➢ t J!'�r ��. �.��G �',,., ;j �' a , ,r".i • .�{� (;�.•'i f� y� 'S! .,,, � ��C L; '* l�v , ��'% Tt�1l� ;ataeep�w4„C':•, I'821BZtev 64'Area �'�`•'�' b8ts�iq;.b�# ;be go:'eoCt=-.1 y not. .,. •Not, td mention it .� ,. ...�_ - �-'•--....-..., ,...,...,�._,�b�i.r.__.._ ., . ,i- i.'� P,.��a,.�'.+&�: ` Est: "• f{ �..�%' <�j'",,j�e. .;i IR r;,��/ • .i!!";'s • .'1r''• l.. di/`jr��J��: rrl.t..:. , ,;� . . . 1 1i�h%iPfil�ti � v•' K✓;'ij��`•iy,.;?�..{�_ti_ r y, �,. is o�'�'••tr , . �• .�.. OFMA ,T I • On this day of February, 1982, at Cordova, Alaska We, the undersigned, having personal experience with Prince William Sound do hereby oppose the appropriation • and any further State -Federal appropriation of monies for 1 harbor development, construction of a harbor -breakwater or marina at LaTouche Island. Reasons against harbor construct LaTouche , In full light of the fat r - .. . Island is not the place -nstruct a Ten Million Dollar harbor ►ecause of its location within Prince William Sound in accordance with the environmental ,.•, conditions in that area have full impact • ;,,,;;� �•:• -on LaTouche Island r!t. Address s Signatures ,.;; ,•�;ry.. •. IJ/.t ,':.,l. Y'..a '1•tJi7,3.�1•D'''r �, .• ;-- e� �L�,%-,�s�,i'�:•':. :r. -1 .• • .-,•.•.'-.-;rt. .c.'.i:.,.. 's `SiJ•.iaZ:4�Sl :x''�{ �1 f' ,, - � ,.. y..� bra• ir',, "'v•� : � . - •, •'- • .,�::,. ;• :.., �-• ,;':R •��w1 ` f ' u ' I',f�'lSii'..il-Rh',s>�,' '�s- t � •�i�.+�---T-- '•'' ',t'�.y.s.t.... ii ti �,• r net>�i�%�`(7.1r'�Y,i:i^...ri;.n;r•+v•• �Ir•ryr•--�•— -�•�,• ,t, 1;4 -.f -.0 Randy Barnes Box 1304 Cordova, Alaska 2-17-82 Lt Oov Terry Miller Pouch AA Juneau#'Alaska Dear3*ov )tillers 1. I am enclosing herewith cOPJr Of an original petition being seit to Corp of Engineers. 3 PS-DIC-Ion is "Only the first Page". A number of fishermen and myself around Alaska have decided "If the State isn't willing to open its ears". P8rh&PS if enough people Come forth it will listen. Being a fisherman and knowing the Sound#eecostsp p weather other wti . neat factg000esthe idea of building a costlyeboat harbor, marina, FR214TW= In the WRONO LOGATIONP is stupid. • With other more important projects being slashed,..,with Alaska 4jjntj�j- out its budgOti the '008t'of $3,,0000000 originally toy NOT TO'RWZON the now costs given of $40 goo,, 0,approlftato 0.00 to $100000*000000":,�,, which 9 9,not include maintance'. liability in 9a, On top of Ali 'thiss'YOu h&VG a "natural,, deep water, sheltered hwbiiv sitting right agross the bay in Sawmill Bay on Evans Island -long been established.':The originaf%�vcst of Latouche in eAr3.w a Ocost2jrw -snd!,-,'b oft,:by an active HiniWCorp. Once it became� will notice it was "left set,,* m�,, Other landowners never develo At &4 U, costsf We&theI!*9tG# -Now some 11hotshot" wants to benefit nuplan4 d8*61 rot Not with nV,,tax,dollars .... otherwise letz; ask for an.. -—I all Alaska for 4_44*4,10 Ww" Ong Wit!, 5, i*��Prat Sincerely Yours, P01itics, Politics and more politics By By MARLA AAKINS This week I find I am un popular in every hitch .. , not winning any popularity contest. Last week as some well meaning Alaskan was raving un and on about "what a super job I was do• ing," and to keep up the good work. I lit into him like a light bulb! I suggested that instead of sit- ting around in his rocking chair. swigging coffee for beer), maybe he ought to get off his duff and voice his own opinions, take the time to speak up and quit asking As a citizen, each and every one of us should clean up our own backyard and do our jobs or not complain or expect our Juneau Leople to clean up theirs. n ... Some environmental agen• ties have tied up the Susitna hydropower project and itc "earmarked" MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS? I applaud this action until we can find out just why, how and what for the dollars will be spent. if we are going to cut c%ts ... 2t least we should look it over carefully. . That the Anchorage Times reports a certain senator -hope to ring the death knell for the Alaska Energy Center?" .. That the same senator who Sponsored the Susitna hydro pro. - feet also sponsored the BOON. DOGGLE LATOUCIIE fiasco? I am told more dollars may be needed for this Latouche project. That while Canada may get a gas line route there is still strong rumor that a spur may come into Prince William Sound? That the Fisheries Enhancement Loan Fund monies were supposedly slashed from t25 to $8 million last yexr . and while several sound, stable pro• grams were slashed, it was out of the same big pot other appropria- lions were made for less wor- hwhile causes? John Q. Public wonders to is handling the millions ap• ropriated and the bookkeeping for the Seward area shipbuilding project• I have contended for a number of years that we needed such a taellit). However. I am not UP On costs. justification orany of the vital information on a project of this magnitude. That small communities with hospitals such as Cordova, Glennallen. Valdez, and Seaward are balls• in need of cquipmert and upgrading and yet we put. monies elsewhere! I have always worried about a major disaster t striking, with weather making it impoesibie to get to Anchorage. I what we would do to take care of the injured. That supposedly, Alaska is to retain only a limited numberof large Coast Guard vessels due to the recent cutbacks? Often our Coast Guard is the lifeline for many during the busy fishing seasons or for foreign problems. That quite often many Alaskans -miss out" on voicing their opinions because we are not aware of a certain issue or teleconference in our area? I can and would like to thank Lt. Gov. Terry Miller and Rep. Bette Cato for recently making information available to me that will insure I don't run into this problem as much in the future. With a parting shot and at the risk of repeating ... I just want to see ALL (W L'S **clean up our act" a little where our beloved state is xnncerneu. It is most em- harassing to travel outside and abroad and have fun poked at you for our vast wealth. our careless use of it and our incomPetancy at both the local and Mate govern. ment levels. I got Vghting ma., , .. but I guess one has to sum it all up by saying, that's politics folks. Marla Adkins is a lo.year Prince Wililam Sound resident who rwnv Ives In Cordova.) Wheeler-dealers Juneau, we know there are other good ones among you. Voting Dear Editor, . time b rolling srotmd. Maybe a d KW7* histrah, hurrah for the clean house will clean it up if •Aachorage Times and its 000*4 eha dm• s 1. ediforld somm on - sahmuy, Jag "Wbetikrdeak=.» " $heron so on • Zharoff Good work. All of m know what Cordova di bul this Put our yeilr4ppending spree OW the exem deds are enottgb. Juneau "totgets" that people ' vote loodstors in office and it is us theY must appease, not each followi>g as I applaud Rep. Fannbtg'a gutsy a to Driver truth but the poor man will pro- bably suffer pressures and slap• w d li co ate yrN, on Pod hands in the motley ap. Propriation areas he needs for his a vie nt n ca ter.ua my f th up oa were community. It: w^rof#ftfth .1b ltnddodiQ► shin ells And L don'{ tam you fo*,not � man will sp,.a •.t• r ..nse on �MMM an average don PeNectic Iw+c:.. ■ ■ No • � 1 T.ur wyn.e' +dtsn,:t;:: S1.eem t add ,up �n Juneau �.;Ij��Ft , ti'• r ,%.3`}'i,'Wt>vl-';si r+�N' !r' Y/.�.t;}% �, (.( rf; . ;f,I .T(1. xnRk..• . •f''dRy.�`-.b�7, },f•,�; •Y.-..•:t'•,h .r,• :�•`.. �. •�.�i.,�tu•1%: •!: �+'!• <i =.• ,"f 71y E wf!!J� we Ow. It90 tttatsarsij. r s�. ' „ Ili.,heeds toa, some 70 Jaflas at ma lan. The price of uU caild be cut ?? in two yip „• la,'. Jai` �!. i 1 wG. C•'• gtc 'a� M iiMrAy/.Gtlllc bM. a , : = , r .1,}�} s :o: ,<4. .,i 1 fhe state. and it wouldn't matter: half of an unbeDavabl•, t , w lfaih t00 pi of �: , p: �. a t� ppf�R spent more than ' fortune 1a atU an unbelievable fortune. ;41 Ea Y' �011:, .% ,! it!tof f'o, 'to air one W t - What's golnr. n^ in J au I don't pretend toi1fAd I^•understand. 6r Whst's going on fn Juneau ~t� •ssjt"�.` r,q fi �i `-were golr� on 1 ,I.w. I still wouldn't under'; t<•�ctton of of • ws efita' .: .;I�X., , j,';' falkir to mtml7etf� I'm a stand It. t 4 like io say the politicians ors, simply . .t::t:de Arid, ((aaaaliy )0 [prays, bdo It sQld t pdabody Is adding bewildered. but it has been my experience gat: he bt.kx� pd Ong* I ' . } ap whit am while often confusing• legislators are seldom - 1 wvK :Tgrpe4 Ip' .:pf, `` '; �;; '� l 1`�i s '` Confused. Therefore. one must conclude there is ' ! truri q b�that asme a method to their mathematical me&". They ' .+ 3� w w mqe k.;go n f%�l aRS tokMp'bdh art confusing us for a purpose. They are adding i •' Yon' �tpa' b a fairly r, - prspgfd•two two and two, getting sts, and acting like it's the t... R ! ad <�ffe10 isM oF: 'ielf�,Nfo to r: f' strostnormalthJngintheworld. ledger ' .. ?s ° tAeo 1wIS What could they possibly want4 They've trot a, Pg� ptb hide of the UMS4> WIM ''bluitf" r MWdw dnmu per diem. They've got travel expenses. Tbey vs t ij{er; ojt4i q, bofh,the'. On,�(}� of we nr -Led with i Y• ;at large paid staffs. ' 'afAl i/ tjgla bamd did' Bge�nn F.(t soy have about t3 why! T t'• •Iw! They want a raiset They want s` u �! at aM •i1roronn' ((oopprr��aa�iias 91!J • .blUiasC �• give or take a few hund�ryr sy aft0l��att , >iwre ml. 1 hey want biggerpaychecks. �: r wx • treqvim Me' ArbotL 1111on, ;*JUL to build dams ar'd. ofp•fr t itar )tit :" ebe o@terset Wells:.:..,, why didn't they dust say so. Thty " ti>it'a atidad:•It�tavtt��tsiRl6d"` •d t R go-SOMM d ,•.an give themselves a rat" and at Ow some "istt' "�e and "floatlug tom• 'f oa' '.'Va got a sCgte Doparbrian!'' gave tMni.Y' lime 1Unit the length of the legtalative sealan, ,4z -1L" aa4 !, attd a.pp� j ; of II O ° ' t : lan4 ' of theft' . , w ' we call Uav� i>t+F,s�6f «3g a6t '' tins guaratKeeing they won't ease Ufa money. ; T n ,at ale mskralt Ja . fb'AS 4tkttl�atpeea Ecceusk : r i`; �M 1f�? �.Ffattst'WstM: N. <,ttuelyttteitatecansUordthat •' 1; tLt `to bxtd pa3n1 to nttdar UM any, W ybbam.;• . ,; `> ° rc�;�sl+t'r You understand don't you? It's Jost simple to IdtatiC Ili"? Qitt(t!btiY4obata.'<:•� ; +,Oitr t,ax}j'r►PVe, s hnndfu! ot. ;,� rttt 1tF•: ,St .:,,, a: • } 'j'•3' ♦<tltblltaaties. OAf�t }st r lam! �aat >arour ho }I'Qott M't *Wp9'01130 4 t bulb ew state if sfpl Wri" '�irh0 a� Btlbt rtt ��Qrottimtrlooh a ��IAwaooaatnle•toedeetmaaut. i }' tllaie��a 4tx ihrVn337P!pla Jf!yJ may not p„ET.Na 4S'` ".#�� J '` ,L9< it )>�t-.}""�9r•t!.• R'v {�°jq.. t,'•_ "';�Zi icS,i!;• fi"'•il }r`•'>;�:•••y�'l,f..r,'t;i :rl741 /�i �'bl ��. 'iir, ,�•'! `f d171t.<.'•; :•.�� •�S '' , .t. 'yi,•Y, :'-`gc /r.}�� }:v of i.ta. r( off% a�<$J • ✓,!.'. � ' ..'t,:• t { f`71f. �,.: ; . •i'%I, •.�,y ; .•EpYali�� :%.,,-t„...' - +• .'p 't%�! �t y °� ,rFv j' , F✓... ;� � � - '' • rr .f + - 'fr�.•'f�,� t•�l; '>>:r Y'Y.�: •'f• �,. � '�f � �Yf �6�, •. �.. r. �4. ai„ •tf A, ��; <�' :j;',.` , .�3t•`�+t,i�_�:. ,:/.,,j��y:+•'• Wf:,,.f- _v+a�'rt :,e.:..` }�r.,J' 1- .,, t% _ / (rY • .Tr7 � 41�{<..` ,la, �;'�f.#�1'J•?:�..<;�1..�i,l/-1�14,«i• �if7. t. :A. i YI �i1.1! ' �' �wi. ` ". b ! {,��- f',i . il•' �f •f ,f•„ 1.S .>•. ..; •�''y.' .y'. i; �:y . ft"ait". �Y`. `.',jf�1�p'{1��;is/tj •�#i '✓ �� Y,''�r•'•• Y'•�i7'' X.:^h c '-f Rsi .:` '� •ti 1111111112 . s i , J 4 F F :1 F� 1 v ' i • VZ CITY OF KENAI 110d Oap4W 4 4" ►. O. SOX NO KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 483 • YUS DATE: February 24, 19►82 TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission Per request of the Kenai City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposal for the purchase of the Coyle property and the following is the recommendation: MOTION: The Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission concurs with the Motion Amendment of the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission which reads "The Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission recommends to the Kenai City Council that an offer be made to the Coyles through their appointed agent to purchase the property in question for the appraised value of $5,850 per acre or a total price of $184,275. VOTE: The motion passed with Commissioners Castimore, Lewis, Blanning and Smalley voting yes; Chairman Bryson abstaining. ii I F '-p CITY OF KENAI G'dp" 4 4"„ F. O. 60X 660 KINAI, ALASKA 99611 T1l1/NON1 266 • 7666 DATE: February 23, 1982 TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission Per your request, the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission discussed the purchase of the Coyle property and the following recommendation was made: MOTION: The Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission has no recommendation at this time. MOTION AMENDMENT: The Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission recommends to the Kenai City Council that an offer be made to the Coyles through their appointed agent to purchase the property in question for the appraised value of $5,850 per acre or a total price of $184,275. fi VOTE: The amended motion passed by unanimous roll call vote US Deportment Alaeikan Heginn 701 C Stroet. Box 14 of Trotsportolon Anchorage. Alaska Federal Aviation 935 13 Administrati-7n + r PER 2 31982 GY Clr• ':'•t1111f5T1?Ari j c irY C" 1 Mr. William J. Brighton City Manager of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mr. Brighton: Kenai Municipal Airport, Lot 1, Blk.3 Per your telephone request of February 18, 1982, we have reviewed the proposal to allow the construction of a nonaviation oriented business on Lot l of Block 3, General Aviation Apron No. 1. The transfer documents are specific in that this area is to be utilized by aviation business only. We cannot concur that a clam processing plant is aviation oriented even though the clams are to be flown in to the airport. We suggest a lot further off the apron area, which is classified for non - aviation use, be leased or purchased for this facility. If you have further justification and feel that an additional review would be beneficial, please let us know. Sincerely, Floy6 H. Pattison Chief, Planning & Programing Branch Airports Division C F- y !FVnv, F1 lV LA VIEAIL US Alf IE A�IpIp1�2Ad1� S,�1L Throughout the Kenai Peninsula Box 1413 • Soldotna, Alaska 99669.262-5822 January 26, 1982 ..:.Cc;.iVct7 U 1982 r; r: t••a:N05n,Ar:4N William J. Brighton City Manager City of Kenai P. 0. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 RE: Proposal for Reappraisal of 20 City owned Lots. Dear Mr. Brighton: Please accept the following figure as my bid proposal for the reappraisal of the 20 City owned lots identified in your bid request. My bid for the appraisal of the property on a group basis and in the same format that was provided you for 42 lots March 9, 1981 is as follows: TWELVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,200.00) It is understood that the appraisal will be received -in the City Manager's office not later than March 12, 1982 at 5:00 p.m. Thank you for including Frykholm Appraisal on your list of prospective bidders. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, n FhYKHOLM RFjAL ESTATE APPRAISAL LL__ ,VQ!non L.'jFr Aolm�'I`Jr. Appraiser VLF/bjo r Phone (007) 262.74" a l 5d ZU40 Foal 54044 ,40S4 44 P.O. BOX 315 SOLOOTNA,ALASKA9M9 j-,-7CZiVLZ0 ! ;>, 198Z EY CITY tMUNISTRAT1ON CRY OF' +1 January 26, 1982 City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attn: Wm. Brighton RE: Reappraisals of City of Kenai land Dear Mr. Brighton: Please accept my bid of $1, 900.00 as the total amount for appraising the properties in question. Thank you for the opportunity of being considered in the bidding process. Rasps tfully submitted. art ✓io Edwin S. Warfle, .R.A. Appraiser f� 3 01 THE FOLLOWING CHECKS ARE OVER $1,000.00 WHICH NLED COUNCIL. APPROVAL. OR RATIFICATION 3/3/82 �....,� VENDOR AMOUNT QESCRIPTIU4 PMJY.CT/UEPAR3MEILT ACCOUNT f:IlAHsiP. A1f0UNI' PO 1 FOR APPROVAL: Alaska Travel Cache 1*638,18 Ticket to Crime Prevention Police Travel 821.18 32071 Institute 2 Tickets to Arson School Fire Travel 817.00 31979 Brown Construction 29,584.91 Pay Est.020 CP-STP Construction 29,584.91 CH2M Hill 20,700.00 Pay Eat. 033 CP-STP Arch. Fees 2,760.00 Project Inspections 8,740.00 Pay Est. 134 CP-STP Arch. Fees 4,330.00 Project Inspections 4,870.00 Clean Right Janitorial 2.000.00 Feb. Janitorial Terminal Professional Services 2,000.00 30084 Jackson 6 Garland 1,400.00 Excavate Ditch on Princess St. Streets Repair b Maintenance I,4OO.00 31577 PERS 26,244.31 Feb. Retirement Various Retirement 26.244.31 Tim's Janitorial 1.287.00 Feb. Janitorial Non -Departmental Professional Services 1,287.00 30033 FOR RATIFICATIONS AMEFCU 15,127.00 Feb. Credit Union W/H Various Liability 15,127.00 Bayly, Martin b Fay 5,457.00 Jan. Workmen's Compensation Various Workmen's Compensation 5,457.00 National Bank of AK 39,439.00 Feb. Federal W/H General Fund Liability 39,43•s.00 National Bank of AK 900,000.00 REPO 2/17/82 Central Treasury Central Treasury 900,000.00 14i Int. 800,000.00 REPO 2/22/82 Central Treasury Central Treasury 800,000.00 11.57. Int. 900,000.00 REPO 2/26/82 Central Treasury Central Treasury 900,000.00 11.5% Int. Ii.Eq•JISSIT1GNS, GVER y1,JW0.00 IJiilCli NLI:D COUNCIL tu"iRUVAL 3131882 VENDOR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT InUNT Alaska Industrial Hardware 2 Barrels 111-test Chain Airport M&O Repair 6 Maint. Supplies 2,092.00 ' 850 ft. p;u.: 24 Grab 11,)oks L Computer Palace Texas Instruments Computer PR-LIhrnry Machinery 6 Equipment 2,724.00 v b Printer O'Brien Diviaion 500 ft. of Sewor Jet Hose Sewer Repair 4 Mnint. Supplies 1,5011.00 Conco, Inc. Yukon Office Supply Steel Desk with Right Hand Library Machinery L Equipment 1,312.00 Return 1] ' I 1 � ' I I ---.._ Q ' � � • i 1 I 1 1f . 11 I 1 ,i • G-1 CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 757-82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE•1981-82' AIRPORT TERMINAL FUND BUDGET BY $30,500 FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARKING LOTS AT THE AIRPORT TERMINAL. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai desires to upgrade and expand the parking lots at the Airport Terminal Building, and WHEREAS, the City wishes to retain an engineer for preparation of plans and specifications for such improvements. WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made in the Airport Terminal Fund Budget: Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Retained Earnings 3 Increase Appropriations: Administration $ 500 Engineering 30,000 S30 "= PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of March, 1982. VINCENT O'REILLY,~MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk - First Reading: February 17, 1982 Second Reading: March 3, 1982 Effective Date: March 3, 1982 Approved by Finance: Cr 1 CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 758-82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82 AIRPORT LAND SYSTEM BUDGET BY $5,300 FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND PREPARATION OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A FLOAT PLANE BASIN. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is in need of a float plane basin, and desires to file an application with the Federal Aviation Administration for a grant for its construction, and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain an engineer for preliminary engineering and preparation of the grant application. WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made in the 1981-82 Airport Land System Budgets Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Fund Balance $5300 Increase Appropriations: Airport Administration -Administration $ 300 Airport Administration -Engineering _511 00Q gall= PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of March, 1982. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances `--Z,Z - VINCENT O'REILLY, MAYOR First Reading: February 17, 1982 Second Reading: March 3, 1982 Effective Date: March 3, 1982 .l CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 759-82 .r I AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL 01' THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82 GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $87,338 FOR THE PREPARATION OF A DRAINAGE • STUDY. ��.,d0i at ae'•,. e PrJ ec.r t'y.,d eht:'t1i� "Drn.h�YSG s fN�y,/7/ WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available --in the City's -Cap-i£-aT- Improvements Reserve to fund the project, and WHEREAS, it is desirable.that these services be performed for the benefit of the City, and WhEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations in.. General Fun4-Su4ge4- be increased as follows: • - Zr.crlri�G �fl..n4tod lZF✓lnvei "�".��`"' Of Rejer✓e for �Ar:rQ Z ..'lr"'w. J':• .... .•ir - Zhc .•��iLr�`'wC ✓, 'rw•5::«. NOh-filpg '/•PhP ?•4�+ L /. �j V ....a..:' ^•�• .. -• / r 1/ Try, t/` C.' /I C9� i��i /"YO, Par. _r7. 3n, :.�.r r�i l!i•�• r C�i TQ / l�ro ct 7' ... T►'Gs/f!r T rO.y (/1., Frrr � Fyn � y .f w Oft • �4dh,; r.� r. • ,• .. fhf•�Qav,�J S-ao 7Y 9Yy ' - Con f..•s L'na' r 7 PASSEI) BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI , ALASKA, this 3rd day of ~larch, 1982. ATTEST: First Reading: 'larch 3, 1982 Janet Whelan, City Mr. Seeond Reading: March 3, 1982 Approved by Finance: Effective Date: march 3, 1982 CITY OF KENAI 1 ORDINANCE: NO. 759-82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTI1%WTED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1981-82 GENERAL FUND BUDGET I` THE AMOUNT OF $87,338 FOR THE PREPARATION OF A DRAINAGE • STUDY. WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the City's Capital Improvements Reserve to fund the project, and WHEREAS, it is desirable.that these services be performed for the benefit of the City, and WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations in the 1981-82 General Fund Budget be increased as follows: Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Reserve for Capital Improvements $87,338 Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental --Engineering $78,944 Contingency 7,894 Administration S00 $87,338 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of March, 1982. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: ' N.'`I U L , MAYOR First Reading: %larch 3, 1982 Second Reading: March 3, 1982 Effective Date: March 3, 1982 rM CFJ CITY OF KENAI P. O. SOX $80 KINAI, ALAfKA 99411 TILIPHON! 2S9 • 7635 MEMORANDUM TOs HONORABLE MAYOR & MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL FROMs BEN T. DELAHAY, CITY ATTORNEY -� RE: SETTLEMENT OFFER ON RATE RENEGOTIATION ON LEASES TO SOUTHCENTRAL AIR, INC. AND DAVID DIAMOND DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1982 Just before Christmas I received from Rick Baldwin the letter regarding the proposed settlement in the above -named matter, a copy of which is attached hereto. Due to the pressure of other matters I have been unable until now to make the study of the background of the leases and files necessary to make a recommendation to the Council. For The Council's understanding, it should be pointed out that the lease for Lot 3, Block 1, General Aviation Apron, is for a twenty year term which expires June 30, 1985, with the original Right of Entry and Occupancy authorized on September 15, 1966. The prior rate renegotiation was carried on in 1976 resulting in a rate of 4 cents per square foot, and the current renegotiation (based on an appraisal rate of 6.3 cents per square foot) was begun in the spring of 1981, to be effective July 1, 1981. This lot is the one on which Southcentral has its hangar, shop, offices, and fuel facilities. Lot 1, Block 2, GAA, is also leased to Southcentral under a lease dated August 3, 1977, for a term of 55 years under a current lease rate of 4 cents per square foot and is due for renegotiation or redetermination of rate to be effective July 1, 1982. This lot is just across the,taxiway toward the terminal from Lot 3 in Block 1. The lease to Lot 4, Block 5, GAA, was effective May 1, 1977, for a period of 55 years. This lot is one that fronts on Willow Street, has Fred Braun's Marina on it, and the initial rental rate was 5 cents per square foot. This lot also was brought up - for renegotiation of rate in the spring of 1981, based on an i 1 r= appraisal rate of 10.2 cents per square foot, to be effective July 1, 1981. Lot 3 in Block 1 was leased in 1966, at 2 cents per square foot, but no redetermination of rate was made until 1976, when a new rate was set of 4 cents per square foot. (In the second paragraph of Mr. Baldwin's letter he relates that the City is requesting an increase in rate from 2 cents per square foot to 6 cents per square foot -- this is in error insofar as the rate prior to July 1, 1981, is concerned, which is still being paid by Lessee.) Lot 1 in Block 2. GAA, was leased at the rate of 4 cents per square foot for a passenger waiting room and lounge, pilot lounge, and offices -- I believe that this lot is currently being used only for tie downs. Mr. Baldwin anticipates the City requesting an adjustment of that rate from 4 cents per square foot to 6 cents per square foot to be effective July 31, 1982, based on the limitation contained in the 150% cap provisions; however, since that appraisal would be a year later than the appraisal on Lot 3, Block 1, and since Lot 1 in Block 2 is closer to the terminal and center of activity, it might be appraised at a higher figure. Neither of these leases presently contain the clause providing _ for a 150% cap on renegotiation of rates. As I understand Lessee's offer of settlement (contained in the first paragraph on Page 2 of Mr. Baldwin's letter) it would: 1. Amend the lease on Lot 3, Block 1, GAA, to provide for a 6 cent rental rate effective July 1, 1981; 2, Effective July 1, 1982, amend the lease on Lot 1, Block 2, GAA, to include Lot 3, Block 1, and to set the rate covering both lots at that time at 6 cents per square foots 3. To add to the lease, as above amended, the provision limiting rate increases every 5 years to 150% of the prior �I rate. EThe Council should note that in addition to the benefits recited in the latter part of that Paragraph, this treatment would change i' the expiration date of the lease on Lot 3, Block 1, GAA, from ! 2 t r� 1985 to 2032. and would redetermine the rate on Lot 1, Block 2, GAA, based on a year old appraisal. Since the 150% cap is effective for the first 30 years of a lease, the procedure mentioned would also extend that cap rate on Lot 3, Block 11 to the year 2007, even though the lease on said Lot 3 goes back to 1966, and the purpose for placing the cap on the lots is to enable Lessee to secure financing for improvements which have already been placed on said Lot 3. However, Lessee's offer has much merit in it in that it would decrease the number of adjustments in rates and combine the properties in one lease and would also make possible use of more up-to-date lease terms -- while the renegotiation lease terms in the 1977 lease are better than the terms in the old 1966 lease, I believe that we have still better terms in the current lease form. With respect to those two properties, I would recommend that the Council approve making a counteroffer to Lessee to amend the 1966 lease on Lot 3, Block 1, GAA, to be effective retroactively to July 1, 1981, as follows: 1. Change the term of the lease to 55 years: 2. Change the description to include Lot 1, Block 2, GAA; 3. Change the entire body of the lease to the form currently being used: 4. Include the 150% cap in the lease terms. This amendment would have all of the benefits recited in tor. Baldwin's letter and would extend the lease to the year 2020. However, it would restrict the application of the 150% renegotiation rate cap to the period ending June 30, 1995. It would cost Lessee an additional $1,000 in increased rent on Lot 1, Block 2, for the year beginning July 1, 1981, but it would lock in that rate for 5 years and remove the possibility that the appraisal in 1982 might result in a higher rent for the next five years in the event the Council amends the ordinance to remove the practice of limiting rent increases to 150% of the old rate. It would also protect both of these leases against possible future changes of policy to remove the 150% cap limitation on rental increases. 3 Lessee also offers to acquiesce in the rate increase on Lot 4, Block 5, GAA, providing that the foregoing terms on the other lots are accepted by the City and that the cap rate provision is added to the terms of this lease. I would assume that if agreement is reached as to the above recommended counteroffer, that his offer of acceptance would still be valid. However, on this lot I have a great many reservations about including the 150% cap rate in the lease. This lease was granted for the purpose of "Aircraft tie -downs, aircraft maintenance and machine shop and office building% I believe that this is the lot on which Fred Braun's Marina is established, and that it is not being used for the purposes for which the lease was secured. Not only is it against the policy previously set by Council, but as recently communicated to us regarding the proposed use by Arctic Aviation, the FAA would find its present use in violation of the deed to the City under which use of that land is restricted. At the present time the policy set by Council is to utilize the 150% cap on rate increases where land is on the airport and used for airport -related purposes. Since the use of this lot is not in compliance with the terms of the lease and is apparently not airport -related, I would suggest that it might be subject to cancellation, and the City should certainly not extend the 150% cap rate clause to it. Furthermore, this lease is to a different entity -- the lessee is David Diamond, whereas the lessee of the other two leases is a corporation, Southcentral Air, Inc. Even though Mr. Diamond may own 100% of the stock of that corporation, the City is still dealing with two separate parties. I would recommend that the City not refuse the Commendable goals of settling the matters and joining the first two lots considered above because of differences of opinion over this lot in Block 5, but that the City refuse to put the cap rate into this lease and to insist on its valuation. BTD/md �__ Enclosure C. R. SALDWI N WALLER TAYLOR, III LAW UFFjCr5 BALDWIN & TAYLOR POST Oft _C BOX 4210 KENAI, ALASKA 99C,11 December 14, 1981 AREA CODE 907 283 -7167 City of Kenai P. O. Box 580 Kenai, AK. 99611 Attn: Ben Delahay City Attorney Re: Lease of Lot 3, Block 1, GAA and Lot 4, Block 5, CAA Dear Ben: I have now had an opportunity to confer with my client concerning the dispute as to the proposed lease rate on the above described property. I have been authorized to make an offer of settlement on South Central's behalf. As to Lot 3, Block 1, GAA, the City is requesting an increase of the lease rate from 2 cents per square foot to 6 cents per square foot. As I have argued in the past, utilizing the income approach in appraising the value of the lots, 6 cents per square foot is too high. The cost approach should not be used because no comparable sales exist. The lots are required to be devoted exclusively to aviation related purposes, thereby limiting the market for the lots as well as the uses to which the lots may be put. The appraisals ordered by the City for the lots in the General Aviation Apron Subdivision do not take into account these factors. As you aware, South Central also is leasing a lot adjacent to the subject property: Lot 1, Block 2, General Aviation Apron Subdivision. The anniversary date for renegotiating the lease payment on that lot is July 31, 1982. Unless a drastic change of policy occurs on behalf of the City Council prior to that date, we would anticipate the City requesting 6 cents per square foot on that lot as well, as the present lease rate is 4 cents per square foot. In my client's opinion, a lease rate of six cents per square foot is unreasonably high. Nevertheless, due to other business considerations, my client is willing to pay such a premium, provided certain concerns can be satisfied by the City. RECEIVED DY LCOAL OEM OFw... PAGES CfTY OF KENAI ■ I am authorized by my client to offer to accede to the City's request of 6 cents per square foot on the subject lot, provided that the lease on Lot- 1, Block L, GAA be amended effective July 1,1982 so as to include under its terms Lot 3, Block 1 as well, and to add the City's standard "cap rate" provision to its terms. This would result in several benefits accruinq both to my client and to the City. Primarily it would simplify accounting and payment concerns. It would also obviate the necessity of negotiating on the 1982 anniversary date as my client would be willing to pay the 6 cents per square foot which the Council would no doubt request. Further the lease instrument covering Lot 3, Block 1 is one of the old, poorly drafted lease forms which does not even contain a provision for resolving disputes as to lease values. That old lease could be done away with under my client's offer. Finally, having the lots combined under the 1976 lease would give South Central the opportunity to consolidate its holdings under one comprehensive lease -hold scheme, providing for security of tenure. This would greatly assist my client in his long-range development and financing plans. As to Lot 4, Block 5, GAA, my client is willing to accede to the City's requested 7.5 cents per square foot, J provided that the City's standard "cap rate" provision is added to the terms of that lease and provided further, that all of the other foregoing terms are accepted by the City. Naturally the foregoing offer is made in an effort to resolve the dispute short of litigation, and is not intended to constitute an admission of any fact, nor, is it intended to set forth an opinion as to value. Please consider the foregoing and advise me if you would be willing to recommend such an offer to the Council. Thank you for your attention to this matter. CRB:jr Very truly yours, C. R. BALDWIN Attorney at Law PAGE..f- EX14 A OF.,.... PAGES I -- F i i v &"% CITY 4F KENAI „0d 6;aja %l 4 4" P 1 P. O. SOX 3S0 KENAI, ALASKA $9611 TELE/BONE 289 • ?US DATE: February 24, 1982 TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission MOTION: The Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission recommends to the Kenai City Council that a contract be drawn up for Wince, Corthell, Bryson, and Frease for proposed engineering services as outlined in the attached proposal, the money to come from the Port Facilities fund, the amount not to exceed $32,300.00. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote jal r�' � 0,w ima rt WINCE • CORTHELL • BRYSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS P 0 Mr 1041 907.213-4672 KENAI, ALASKA (' 99611 Feb. 23, 1982 William J. Brighton City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Proposal for 1982 Site Improvements to Kenai Boat Ramp Dear Mr. Brighton In response to a verbal request by John Williams, Chairman of the Kenai Harbor Commission, I attended a regularly scheduled meeting of that body on February 9, 1982. The purpose of my attendance was to become acquainted With the general intent of the Commission concerning proposed improvements to the existing city boat launch facility. The following itemization is my interpretation of the services envisioned by the Commission. Proposed Scope of Engineering Services A, Re-establish property corners of Kenai Most Ramp plat, tracts A,B,C, and D. B Perform a Boundn Survey and prepare a plat of that portion of the NW* of the NEJ of Section 9, TSN, R11W, lying west of the Bridge Access Road and presently owned by Waldo and Ruby Coyle. Locate existing improvements (gas pipeline). C Perform an As -built Survey of the existing Kenai Boat Ramp, floats, fencing, parking area, and access road. Prepare Plans, Specifications and a Cost Estimate for modifications and additions to the Boat Launch Area, consisting of the following items: 1. Sheltered (roofed) eating area 2. On -site water and sewer facilities 3. Showers (mobile units) 4. Expansion/Repair of existing boat ramp 5. Tent camping area 6. Dock fueling facilities (to be operated as a concession) T. Locate future parking areas J8. One boat repair grid - 501 boat Philip W 087rr+ I! Ater N Corthell / E fresh W Wirtmo p 1 Mr. Brighton Page 2 Feb. 23, 1982 Proposed Costs for Engineering and Surveying Services A. Re-establish boundary Kenai Boat Ramp Plat $1,200 B Survey/Plat Coyle Property $4,000 C As -built Survey Kenai Boat Ramp Plans/Specifications/Cost Estimate for new construction $27,100 Total $32,300 Scheduling- Based on Notice to Proceed on our before April 15, 1982. Boundary Surveys and Platting: June 15 Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimates : Oct. 15, 1982 The City has available recently squired soils data,and in addition, as-builts, contour maps, property data and other information that could eliminate duplication of some services. It is assumed that permission to utilize and incorporate pertinant material would be forthcoming. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience. Very truly yours, WINCE-CORTEML -MYSON W Philip W. Bryson, P. E. r 64 /* eea.ot�r. i 1 - _: -.•ram: ,•�+�*+�•wrNr�rcaLrKL+�nf+Ni —r''/ V 041611.. 41.a!111. A...r...IF-- ...w $1, Innis fo•ru Y S. PI PAHe f u1.,T of I.r-ut nr rHPJf L! MO. —•^ - —+- IRLY. IS•In is ONOMIc OL YllO.•ul r,f APNINII/IIA IIr:N Y. 12120 ►JI PERIODIC ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT ca1Thic—ihli —• MA/la AMO LOCATION Of PROJECT rrvtt SiI:'.Urf TPFAT!JfhT PIAVT ryr)-!IIr'u MAY[ AMn AnORest 0/ CON THAC tOR I'1'(Tt'N f. A..S.gMATCS, J.V. Fox 1313 f 11 PeR1001C taTINAT[ MO, - ZQ Io11 P[RIOO Jall 2tJ, of ,.., . TO 1. COST OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE UNDER ORIGINAL CONTRACT ONLY Entries must he limited to work and costs under the original contract only. (Cork and cost data under change orders is to br shown in Part 2 of this form.) Columns (1)1111OUS11 (5)• Enter data shorn in columns 1, 2, 3, Band 9. Eespectiwely, on Form ED•111 prepared by Contractor. Columns (6) and (7). Show all work completed to date under original contract. Column 18). Enter the difference between entries in columns (5) and (7). Column (9). Show percent ratio of column (7) to column IS), IT[N CONTRACT COMPLETIO TO OAT[ '-'• COST Of QUAINT. eOYIIITea �� T Uhl COST a0. OL fCWIPTION OI IT[M WANT. TOTAL COLT YNGOYPLL�LO WORK •T• COMP art tal M) 11) off Nf o) n) to 1 I.robi.tization 84,335.00 84,335.00 roof 2 Pefrotition 18,000.00 18,000.00 loot 3 EdAthve4p. 311,465.00 518,146.00 319.00 99• 4 Intet lunhote 6,075.00 6,075.00 100! 5 Aspl:att Pavement 11,448.00 10,303.20 -1,145.00 90° 6 Fence 16,?00.00 16,200.00 too' 1 Scedilig 2,544.00 ?a544.00 too' 8 Fe4m Septage Facititrr 11,424.00 11,J24.00 f00' 9 Fou Contaot Funding 11,424.00 11,414.00 1000 10 Forrm Paul:att Flume 11, 124.00 11,424.00 100, 11 Pface Septage Facifitg 6,058.00 6,038.00 100' 12 Pface ContAot [mUrfing 6.038.00 6,038.00 100°� 13 Place Pans!uxU Ffure 6,038.00 6,038.00 too° 14 FoilrigeVeA 120,469.00 20,469.00 - fee, 15 Faun Ctwti<ieA e 1 71,242.00 11,24?.00 lool 16 Fo4m Cea,tVim f ? 132,309.00 1321,309.00 17 Fe4m Studge Pwnp Faifriing is,S96.00 45,696.00 18 FOAM Ctlfets 11,4?4.00 11,195.00 - 229.00 oP°i 19 Ptace PigeVeA 63,615.00 63,675.00 - 1C0'! ?0 Pface Cfo i!ic•t + 1 31,556.00 37,656.01 too", ?1 Pface Cfatitiel a 2' S9,031,00 69,934,CS - fool 172 Pface Sfudgc Purl, rui7dir:a ^4,152.00 74,152.10 for, 23 Pfacc Ctlets t,C;4..0 S,oJ7,CC I"f.OL+ at' ^J !,��•n:y ?c,600.cc 2o,soo.cr 1'� :i raj•tir.:trA.'Ict,:<,•^.j• ?^,ifl2,5' �",982.50 iC:' "u ."ru.Jl• Cu:p•erft:r) "O,�SJ,20 "C,084.,^P fee" ^7 Finu,S:: C.t!:rr:t:n 2,19".. 3,18C.^" - 17^ "9 -rrri✓o ^r:T rarq'rr<Irs ,4[.3,�5 ;6,J63.a' 'M ^9 ^rLiidiJpa Lsue'.'tc..: i,.'S9.^0 S,CiB.,'C ice TO C. rr tr'f 1r•srl f.i ti.•r, rt ..: St.,• 41 „9f, ",f �c. w1i 1" - ' iA+ 31 reo-5 and P'iJ:Ar a 9, s.51. ;J 9, t61. �J 1 "•"" TOTAL Of COST COLUaMS sY�.as vrsLss . I MO. 1/1 0ISCA ►110r 0/ Ii[Y 41 G'•••••• OVAM 1. c01I ►�11 lGrAL co.1 YM11 YM11 I[► 111 1o1 •.'LI ILU 10VA11 WPM 1. 107�L [Ot1 N/ I11 UMGOUILL /[O Va., I[1 COMP OF 32 Painting 151,376.no 135,376.00 9811, 33 fit Exchange CiAc. Ptunp 1,120.00 1,120.00 00% 34 Rouen CfAe. Pump 1,078.00 1,078.00 009 35 Waste Activated Pumps 17,211.00 17,211.00 001 36 Pigested Studge Pumps 19,818.00 19,818.00 US 37 Potyme.4 Pwnp6 7,077.00 6,935.00 142.00 981 38 Septage TAan66m Pumps 14,618.00 14,618.00 001 39 Activated Studge Pumps 114,583.00 114,585.00 00t 40 Studge ReeiAc. Pumps 5,877.00 3,871.00 ' 00€ 41 Studge Bett Pae46 95,981.00 92,101.00 - 1,880.00 98? 42 Rotaay ScAeens 32,502.00 32,507.00 ' 000, 43 Secondahy Ct4Ai6ieA 1.feeh 1?9,161.00 129,761.00 - 000, 44 Aenia Lion Equipment 72,692.00 72,692.00 001 45 Studge Heat ExchangeA 16,908.00 16,908.00 CO$ 46 Aeaobie Ri.geeteA StoueA6 70,030.00 10,030.00 00! 47 Wtation Ba6•en Stotoeu 47,254.00 47,754.00 004, 48 Automatic Compo6it Samptea6 8,527.00 8,527.00 001 49 PotymeA Equipment 13,977.00 13,177.00 OOs 50 tabo4ato4y and shop Equip 30,528.00 30•,528.00 001 51 Diesel Engine GeneAatoa Set 12,720.00 12,720.00 M 52 TAuck 6 T4di& 4 159,586.00 159,452.00 - 1,134.00 99% 53 Chton.inati.on System 14,150.00 14,150.00 001 54 Secondwty Ctati,6iea Dome Cou &u 119,278.00 119,278.00 OOt 55 Bett Conveyou 13,050.00 13,050.00 005 56 Undvtgaound Pipe 310,500.00 310,500.00 009 51 Above Ground Pipe 250,131.00 250,131.00 00 58 HVAC System 127,200.00 127,200.00 009 59 Plumbing, Wu Piping 6 $pet 32,400.00 - 32,400.00 009 60 In6a&.Uon 6 Heat TAaeing 19,080.00 19,080.00 00`? 61 AenoUceV geste4 BoateA 15,600.00 15,600.00 000 62 Etecttical 304,319.00 304,000.00 - 319.00 9.91 63 OveA Excavation ?,100.00 2,100.00 40? TOTAL or cosy cOLUYri 3 599,515.0[d YKV_'" //.11•-le r • •--:�wlsr. ss^.+.gw.�>a:�+<',:s�.t�<Jsrb"ni! 7 51 N! I•Ill [ (/! / 9/1: R4C I r1l Arlf.( r 1. ;)1 NS 1 ,.t1., Id.•Ir ur,.t• ,'nr .,"r..'• ,. ,1.., 1. r1<. r 1, .. ,..n •••. w, r+ CN.M4[ LNGIY _— r•/ 1L nr11.(JI YO •IL 1 Excavation, eacht(itf 9 Engi.ne. Oeftpsa- toR change 2 2.-27 16" EmPAgeneq bgpa6s, Aeduee axle gatingg S de.fete 461 3 9-11 Replace Con•tAot Btdg, dnainUne 1freReaee condo,( adze to ba.bdn bfoueA dete.te expansion joints on digester bfom 4 10-28 R"ize gab tine; new fouveR; tOWeh 4" U.S. line riY I II YS ♦I.n/ L aI •-••4• N , rr YS •ir1 r „/n4{ rN/4r,1 LNn, A ,YPI I T[ D r. •In LJ .. .,NU1 ,1I 95,445 32 ' 95,J45. 2 10,204 23 10,204, 3 1, 943.0 1,911 OS ' 1,911. 8 1,601 00 1,601, 0 8,489`531- 8,489. 1,470. TOTALS — )t1,111 16 * t11,111, 6 3,413. 0 T, ANALYSIS Of ADJUSTED COIF rRACI Amou"T TO DATE (el Orlp-I r0.".,$ +Mr A, (C.L I • I, ..... A'. (e,nJ __.___._____` 3 5t99 01 Ibf pfus: Add",Pns .rhrd.led In rnl.mn { .<hme _ _ •5lJ5 (r) 1'u O,dwul s .rhrd.l,d In rnlun.n 6.have --r-- — ._.._L17,Zr' •_1 r61 O IJ) .,I.a.rd r,•n l +honor .,, d4le---- -- -- - .-- -- -314IL 3 113 819 I6-"L. - {. ANALYSIS OF YORKPERFORwEO -- --- - - - - - - �__ —.� 41 Co•1 PI o: r{,a+l runu.at ..rl prr(omeE to d+r< Mer. f • nnnr .I 3 592 226.20 rhr/ r/.,.1 _ _ _ � � (b) Ewe -1, rrd. rnrd I, dig, 1C.f. I .e.111 1 58 6 above). (cl TMsl-t.1.-k prrlramed f. dsfr--_--___________.-_-_ ApY� (J) I—, A.—IetJtned In +rrurd.nrf . uh r...... I I—. r[h,.. 6o IA Prrr.nl rn1 Joll+, +m+nnlJ! : _ 11 JI 1Y.? 51 ref N,t —.nl ru d on ,-",.f .ork t. dar _ _ — _._-- --_._ J,6.9.5a �J-IZ![1 (It AEd: qurnd. awed it rinv NI IM• Prnod un.rA J,un.d +,hrne4) --- _-- . _ -. __ _ -y rrs.bl<rl.ln(a).nd(I)-------_T---- _---- _— 3,695,410.1b1• fh) Iwss1 Amaum of prrrlou• Gf BAhASC.E DUE THIS PAYtftS7____---- 29,584.91 S. CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR Acrpd,nl TP rhe bear of m) It.-Wo..Ad l., Lrl, 1 "I'dy Sha .11 item. lag Pmui P.SPIrrt al,d uvenn .hP•n •m the I- a th,• P• n,.Le Eainetr 'n. .re roaecr th.r .11 ..; hea hren 1-rlurmed and of the fefelen<rd fontreer, End�q duly .u(hpurd den/1.•a1y rta•rrul • w)ri,rG .n lull .rrr!/ncr Nat the wgamrnra •u}snrunon•, lnn,,men,he Irvr end Ict ! [hr cunusrr Ju ount up to end mt!""S -bitno Pell a( the ••Bslsme Ow Th,s Ny,nent" h.. eluuuuns, /odm +.SdalNns, fi..f t /Nrr, o,nA.r,s s t h, bat Jet, of the prl.ud I -,frd b, th,. Penadlc F.stim/Ie; bren f,rrn ed, .nd the( the unhra,{nrd and h,..Nba onuurw• harr-ICA,d anr•,.aer, r,,,.) •. (-�Cumpli,d •ith sit rhr I.bu, morn loll• of u.d rrmrnrr. b. (_ c..plad . ah sit .1, i.b« I__,Ans of _d , re,Irur „roP! m rh......l+rrcr + }sr +n hvnr.r dnrNlc r.,.r• ..rh re- .yr•t.O..'a I.W. Iru,µuM.• III f611. rhr< rd, L.rrIM Inrrlt neruw of dr.Pu j ROD.* CONSTRUCTION 6 ASSOC., J.V. febhuahy_19,— 82 -- In -•�+t:re�r+Iw+i. •rx�s: �. �- .Y�m•a..,t„� ; 6. CERTIFICATION OF ARCNITECT OR FUGIn Er.R •, r ; • I n - III r I ly If," I hea, IY, Lrd +nd a•rdla I ,Irt + and 1 •. 1 nvs P. • r'.I•^+:, LN V. +1 h n rh+r r .}..� < .a vl nT .rkd,r +Ad W"I $S I. [ vur and a uun . f . I IrL-. •1 rr all .�•i an1 'u - r•"st ,r•r:u!.d m ,hu f4 . �I� n. ..n . yr r, .1 ..p rd ,S •, . ,J _.. .r, net t hr !` n • rl.m..: �<! , ..riYL, ,: •,n r1.li ... a t.r,-. r. v ,.r <,5:. nr +e�<. ' I..I •+1 l�+i r..•rt rinmed•+nd ra q.r•,rad rby rFr a .rou. ivr naua my a r.,i vrrd •r,Jrhr !.. rt<..f +•.,: •i. rtr. �n:u�d ran! .n n e l • •,j I(I1.) f rr. re,e, x • 7. Fr E•PAYYF"r f-CN TfFtCA irl)r1 BY FIELD EnGInLCR 1 ,.. , v .,r :. rn1 •., r,I.. a. • .. .. •..,I• , ..f,. . ,. ,. .. I• r ,.., •.s ' I 'r. I.tl .. tl..� ,- ,•1. ram�• I. , f . . ., .. r , , .nl' . .. I V ,f Anchors a Office CH2M Tower Not 1 1582 2550 2550 Denali Street,, Ot Sth floor J� a�� H I LL Anchorage, Alaska 99501 C! CITY CITY CFNlS7R; TtOry engineers plat iners economists scientists Date January 18 1982 Y Project No. K 12720. Z2 City of Kenai client Ref. No. 512 Box 580 Invoice No. 10717 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attn: Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager INVOICE . For professional services from November 25, 1981 through December 211, 1g81 regarding the Sewerage Projects Construction Services. For detail regarding this billingoperiod refer to Progress Report No. 33. Professional Services $ 7,617.31 • Expenses 2,381.70 Fee 1,500.99 AMOUNTDUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11 ,500.00 x 11:e:36 ►AVA6LE ON RECEIPT Of I%VOICE FINANCE CHARGES WILE BE ASSESSED AT t PERCENT RR MOI.TH IOR MAXIMUM IPERMISSABLEI UNDERSTATE LAW) ON ALL ACCOUNTS OVER JD DAYS PAST DUE UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE IIV OUR CONTRACT IffleW thC/S L CH1,2M Aix _�� (I11gim- Ir. pUtiners e( ollonli.tS .ci(rnti.t. January 12, 1982 K12720.Z2 1982 r r C'rr ""!NIS rRAV014 Mr. Bill Brighton, Manager City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mr. Brighton: Re: Kenai Sewerage Projects Progress Report No. 33 The key work items that we accomplished during the December billing period are summarized as follows: o Completed full-time resident inspection at the sewage treatment plant by Jim Maciariello on December 18. o Cordon Nicholson completed process final inspection and assisted with startup of diversion to the new system. o Reviewed and processed Contractors' pay estimates; reviewed Kenai's settlement with Tam Construction.. o Assisted with ADEC approval of Change Order No. u to the sewage treatment plant construction contract. We anticipate that during January we will complete the final inspection, develop the final punch list, and process the near -final pay estimate. Additionally, Dale Richwine will be at the plant January 25-29 to provide startup services and operator training. The record drawings remain to be completed. Anchorage alrK! Denali Towers North, 2550 Denali Street. Sih Floor, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 907/278.2551 r CIS . r, ..."». ... c .mac ....... ......... . . ., . .. � _� Mr. Bill Brighton, Manager January 12, 1982 K12720.Z2 Page 2. The following table summarizes cost data for engineering services through December 24, 1981. The task designations correspond with our engineer- Ing services agreement, as amended through Amendment No. 3. Previously Task Authorized Billed This Bill Total B. Services During , Construction $ 95,514$ 86,102' $ 2,555 $ 88,657 C. Onsite Inspection 192,992 178,372 ' 8,740 187,112 D. 133-8, E-1, 6 Special and Other 81 C157 58,266 ' 205 58,471 Total $369,663 y $322,740 �{ $ 11,500 �� $334,240 1- Sincerely, dr*41-11W AAMAt-- Loren D. Leman, P.E. bja:100:g cc: Keith Kornells Charles Brown AIPO aCEi`J-7:7D CH2M Anchorageoffice Denali Towers North 2550 Denali Street, Bth floor Ji�HILL Anchorage, Alaska99501 r,.rcr`irYIMINIP,TRATIVI engineers plat Iners scientists Date February 15, 1982 Project No. K12720. Z2 City of Kenai Client Ref. No. 512 Box 580 Invoice No. 10757 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attn: Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager INVOICE ? For professional services from December 25, 19-31 through January 24, 1982 regarding the Sewerage Projects Construction Services. For detail regarding this billing period refer to Progress Report No. " � 3Y Professional Services $6,488.09 Expenses 1,528.04 Fee 1,183.87 AMOUNTDUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9,200.00 'Y i' 30)`/W -- =- 4 _ 11:g:62 " r J MAKE ON RECEIPT OF INVOICE. FINANCE CHARGES Will K ASSESSED AT 1 PERCENT PER MONTH NOR MAXIMUM IPERMISSAQLEI UNDER STATE i LAWI ON ALL ACCOUNTS OVER 70 PAYS PAST DUE UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE IN OUR CONTRACT. / I =i I I CH2M j,AHILL engineers pUnners economists scientists February 12, 1982 K12720.Z2 Mr. Bill Brighton, Manager City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mr. Brighton: Re: Kenai Sewerage Projects Progress Report No. 34 The key items that we accomplished during the January billing period are summarized as follows: o Conducted occasional on -site inspection at the sewage treatment plant by Jim Maclariello. o Discussed completion of 06M Manual with Mustafa, Hong and ADEC. o Reviewed and processed Contractors' pay estimate. o Completed final inspection on January 22; prepared punch list for Contractor. Work that remains to be completed includes preparation of record drawings, occasional on -site inspection, preparation of Change Order No. 5, work on warranty Items, and replacement of survey monuments along the inter- ceptor route. The Contractor's schedule required that we provide full-time on -site Inspection through December 18, instead of December 1, as projected In our budget review letter of September 15. This work Is beyond the budgeted scope of work, and work remaining will require an additional budget increase for our services. We will prepare and discuss these costs with you by separate letter. Mtcho ase offs« Denali Towers North. 2550 Denali Street.8th floor, Anchorage, Alaska 9950J 907/278-2551 Mr. Bill Brighton, Manager February 12, 1982 K12720.Z2 Page 2. The following table summarizes cost data for engineering services through January 24, 1982. The task designations correspond with our engineer- ing services agreement, as amended through Amendment No. 3. Previously Task Authorized Billed This Bill Total B. Services During Construction $ 95,514 $ 88,657 ' $ 3,145 $ 91,802 C. Onsite Inspection 192,992 / 187,112 - 4,870 191,982 D. D3-8, E-1, 6 Special and Other 81,157 58,471' 1,185 59,656 Total $369,663 x $334,240•( $ 9,200 Y $343,440 �Siincerely,, 1�.A74I AftlA,' Loren D. Leman, P.E. bja:100:g cc: Keith Kornelis Charles Brown ti� ------.,9, -,. . ,.,...- CITY OF KENAI z4v FOR COUNCIL INFOMMATION Transfers of Funds under $1,000 under KMC 7.25.020 (a) Any Special Date Dept. Amount From To Explanation 2/18/82 Water $840.00 Conting. Oper. Supplies 2/23/82 Library $225.00 8066 8064 2/24/82 Sewer $300.00 2023 2024 *Unless some special explanation is filled in, the reason for necessity or desirability of the transfer can be assumed to be due to the normal condition that expense estimates during the budget process were over estimated in one or more accounts and under estimated in one or more accounts. ■ Aor CITY OF KENAI "D,GI Cap" 4 4Z""jF1 _ /. O. SOX $80 KENAI, A&ASKA 99611 TELEPNONE 313 • 7336 February 26, 1982 TOs Council FROM: Vincent O'Reilly All Mayor I. Telephone Conversation from Dick Angel1,Alaska 1984 Dick wanted to know our situation. I responded, Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and initial Alaska 1984 Task Force favored some type of community l celebration but did not wish to involve with the State wide effort. II. Telephone Conversation with Rep. Pat O'Connell, Feb. 26, 1982 To the Best of My Recollection: i A. Municipal Assistance Funding: Governor's Bill proposing combining of Revenue Sharing and MAP before House Committee, somewhat favors rural areas. Sen. Dankworth's Senate Bill is intro- duced increasing MAP percentage from 10% to 30%. Senate Bill probably will be more favorably considered. Everyone still trying to get clarification on $250 per capita scheduled to be distributed July 1, 1982. Intent of- State Adminstration is to distribute money. Some would like re -endorsing appropriation. TOs Council - 2 - Feb. 26, 1982 B. Capital Improvement Projects: Still in bargain- ing stage, far, far from over. Some State projects may be proposed for State bonding vote. All of City's C.I.P. have been submitted in priority City furnished legislators. Had some casual conversation regarding location of pistol and rifle range at site of gym. VORsjw N KENAI ADVISORY 11A100R COMMISSION Regular Meeting; of February 9, 1982 Kenai City Hall John.Williams, Chairman A. CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:12 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Present: John Williams, Tom Thompson, Leon Quesnel, and Paul Weller C. AGENDA APPROVAL Agenda approved with the following additions: G-2, discussion of budget; 11-4. Coyle Appraisal; H-5, new members D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, January 26, 1982 Minutes approved with no changes, additions, or corrections E. GUEST SPEAKERS None F. C04MUNICATIONS 1. John Williams read a letter from PNWA which would assist in clarifying membership status in PNWA for the Commissioners 2. A copy of the letter written to TAMS, Phillip Perdichizzi was included in the packet and was introduced by Chairman Williams G. REPORTS 1. Budget Report from Bill Brighton A check has been written on account 62, C.F. Port Facilities for $100,000 to Bob Roper, bringing; that account from $250,000 to $150,000. The rest stands the same as presented on the sheets. The balance of the $500,000 from the State grant is not showing, Mr. Brighton will get copies to the Commission. The Coast Zone Management grant is not carried over and not available as it has reverted back to C7.M. Account 01-41950-4531 shows $35,980 but is :actually $21,555 due to this reversion. After some figuring. Mr. Williams pointed out that there should be close to $1,000.000 at present after adding the $615,000 and the grant funds of around $390-400,000. J ■ M KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 2 Meeting of February 9, 1982 Mr. Brighton had included a copy of a letter from CH2M Hill regarding the cancellation of the contract and $650.00 owing on phase one of that contract. MOTION: Paul Weller moved, seconded by Tom Thompson to request the City Manager pay the $650.00 to C112M Hill for Phase I of the now cancelled contract. Motion passed unanimously Chairman Williams pointed out to the Commission that the operating budget contains a transportation fund so that if need arises or it becomes necessary to volunteer to attend a meeting of PNWA or other harbor related business the money is there. John Williams asked Bill Brighton if money that was in the current operating budget could be carried over to the next budget year, Mr. Brighton answered that it could not, that it would revert back to the general fund. John Williams then proposed that the Commission allocate a budget commensurate with the previous budget, inasmuch as the Commission may now take a more active roll. H. OLD BUSINESS Chairman Williams asked thatthe agenda be changed under this heading to allow the smaller, less time consuming items first and take the boat ramp project last. There were no objections. 1. Nortec Conference The Commission met with the Council and Nortec and asked Nortec for some cost estimate for a library search, a new proposal for the sediment study since the old one is a year old, and engineering on erosion control on the bluff. Nortec is to get back to the Commission and Council in the near future. 2. Coyle Appraisal There is no action necessary at this time, a copy of the appraisal is in the packet for information and future consideration. 3. New Members Since Mayor O'Reilly was not at the meeting, the acquisition of new members could not be discussed, however, the Commission members were asked to investigate any future members they might know. Chairman Williams asked that a note be sent to the Mayor regarding this. I i �II rj KF:NAI ADVISORY HARBOR CO."ISSION Meeting of February 9, 1982 Page 3 4. Boat Ramp Project Phil Bryson of Wince. Corthell, Bryson, and Freas was present in the audience to meet with the Commission in a work session to make recommendations. A report will be made: at the next meeting. 5. get Net Leases The Tidelands Ordinance Work Book was passed out to the Commission members for reference and discussion. The Commission discussed the ordinances now in effect and changes that should be made, plus the roll the State now plays in offshore leases and set net permits. John Williams voiced 'his concern over the City getting involved at all since there were only six leases in question. Tom Wagoner suggested the issue be taken care of since it had been suspended for four years. Mr. Brighton asked if the State gave the responsibility or mandated the responsibility of the leases to the City and Mr. Williams responded that, to his understanding when the City accepted the tidelands, it also accepted the responsibility of the leases. Chairman Williams drafted several questions to be written to the City Attorney, Mr. Delahay to assist in making a decision. They are: 1. Is the set net section of ordinance 455.78, page 22, section 5 now in effect or has it been deleted as a part of the overall ordinance; 2. Is there now in effect any set net permit ordinance; 3. Did the State mandate to the City of Kenai upon acceptance of the Kenai City tidelands, the authority to issue set net leases (shore fishery leases); 4. How many shore fisheries leases within the City have expired or are about to expire; 5. Has the City of Kenai had any correspondence from any shore fisheries lease holder since the issuance of ordinance 455.78 1. NEW BUSINESS 1. John Williams asked the City Manager if the money now available in the operating fund under professional services could be expended for preliminary design work on the City owned boat ramp. Mr. Brighton agreed that it could if it were for professional services. It was decided that money from bonding and state appropriations would not be used for the boat ramp project if at all possible. .0 lT KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page k Meeting of February 9, 1982 Chairman Williams proposed a letter to the Corps of Engineers advising them of the purchase of the Roper leases and the fact that the City is contemplating an addition to the existing boat ramp and a repair grid and asking for information regarding the leases that were formerly held by Mr. Roper. A copy of the letter will be in the next packer. J. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD There were none K. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next meeting of the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission will be Tuesday, February 23, 1982. Respectfully submitted: . Janet Loper , Secretary �t d/I Edo .i s PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of February 8, 1982 Mark Necessary, Chairman A. ROLL CALL Present: Mark Necessary, Sally Bailie, Eileen Bryson, and Kayo McGillivrary, Director B. AGENDA APPROVAL Kayo McGillivrary asked that some additions be made to the agenda: F-1, correspondence from the State concerning bike trails H-3, meeting date H-4, Teen Center hours The agenda items were unanimously approved C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 11, 1982 Eileen Bryson asked that on page 4, item I, the words "Beaver Loop" be deleted and the words "Cunningham" be put in its place. Minutes approved with the indicated correction. D. PRESENTATION A desk clock set was presented to Richard Morgan, former Chairman of the Commission in appreciation of his support and tireless efforts on behalf of the City. E. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None F. DIRECTOR'S REPORT 1. The adult basketball is underway with good media coverage from radio and newspaper 2. Racquetball lessons are being offered on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday. So far, there has been good response. The lessons are being offered free. 3. Kayo McGillivrary has put in for the Pepsi Hot Shot Basketball for next year. It will be aimed at boys and girls from 9 - 18 in age and will begin in May. i; s PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Meeting of February 8, 1982 Page 2 4. Mr. McGillivrary informed the Commission that he will be attending the Parks and Recreation Board Meeting in Juneau from February 18th through the 20th and will bring back a report. 5. The fan for the exercise room will be installed soon. Mr. Hackney and Director McGillivrary have made plans to put it on the outside of the building fitting under the stairwell leading to the upper level. The plan is contingent on funds. 6. The Commission discussed the mats for the exercise room with several being considered, however, a decision was made on the mats from Champion Athletic Supply. G. CORRESPONDENCE 1. The letter from the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation was reviewed by the Commission and it was found to be lacking in the type of detailed information needed to make a recommendation as to cost of the bike trail and the specifications and regulations governing its development. 2. The Arco Jesse Owens games will be held in Kenai on June 26th. It is hoped that there will be better publicity coverage this year and a better turnout. H. OLD BUSINESS 1. The bids for the playground equipment leave gone out, with on responding that one being from John Van. The posts that originally went out for bid were changed from the #311 to the #411 due to the fact that #311 posts probably would not withstand the type of heavy use they would be put to. The #311 is more suited to a backyard type of use. 2. It was decided by the Commission to set a work session on the budget for Tuesday, February 16th. 3. The Commission discussed the difficulty of members being able to attend on Monday nights. It was decided unanimously to change the meeting nights from Monday to the first Tuesday of the month, this giving time for any information that needs to go to Council. 4. The employees of the Teen Center felt that since Monday nights were not being attended by the teens, it was suggested that the center close on Mondays, opening on Sundays from 1 p.m. to 8 p.m. in its stead, since there had been input from th teens that this would be a good night for them. It was unanimously agreed by the members that the nights be exchanged with the same number of hours of operation. f=- ' J PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Page 3 Meeting of February 8, 1982 r J. COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS Salley Bailie asked what, if any progress had been made on the date of construction of the gym. Kayo McGillivrary explained some of the financial problems surrounding the proposal and indicated that it would be some time yet before the money would be released to begin construction. When asked about the progress of the Teen Center, Mr. McGillivrary informed the Commission that the machines still were not doing as well as at first anticipated, the problem being from competition in the downtown area and being unable to get the kind of games the kids want. An employee had brought an Intellivision to the Teen Center on more than one occasion to test the response which appeared to be well taken. It was suggested that one be purchased for the Teen Center and a system worked out for use of the equipment. The decision was unanimous to investigate purchase of video equipment, and if r money was available to do go ahead and purchase equipment necessary. J. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be March 2, 1982, Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. The work session will be Tuesday, February 16, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. at the recreation center. Respectfully submitted: Je#et Loper, Secretary f. `r. r=1%` t i� -- 1 J I i i 9 GPslr V��VYV.�/�{`t11f':: - - T-s:�^" :. o .f-'- �•asr�ucsr=:�-,;:'-cir: sae--a-��r. - - � - b 1 .T 7 • KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING - N MARCH 2, 1982t 700 P.M. BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING -. . SOLDOTNA, ALASKA -AGENDA - • A. CALL TO ORDER ssembl : E. PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE Fischer Glanville � :ter;<; „-•'~'� -- �' '�� " C. INVOCATIONi Rev. D. L. Harguess, Church of Christ Ring D. ROLL CALL McBride +.,-•_ ...�� .x. w-.- McCloud ... Z. SEATING Or NEW ASSEMBLYMEMBERS (none) McCahan Schsefermeyer F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Or FEBRUARY 16. 1982 Arness Erandon 0. COMMITTEE REPORTS Corr Crapuchettes (a) Finance (Douglas,. Crawford, Schaefermeyer) (b) Local Affairs (McGahan. Corr, McBride, McCloud) Crawford _ _ .•- (c) Public Works (Brandon. Glanville, Arness) Education/Legislative (Fischer. Dismick Douglas(d) King. Crapuchettes Jean, Dicnick) te) Land Disposal (Crapuchettes, -. Brandon. Corr) tf) Special, Ord. 81-83 (McBride. Crapuchattes, Douglas. McGahan, Davis) (g) Special. Ord. 82-14 (Crapuchettes. Fischer, Jean. Arness) H. AGENDA APPROVAL _Cp ORDINANCE HEARINGS - " - _Code (a) Ord. 82-9 "To Amend Section 20.04.040(A) of the Borough o dinances to Exclude the City of Soldotne _ from the Provisions Which Eliminate the Preparation of Plate for Designated Subdivisions" (Mayor, Req of City) (b) Ord. 82-10 "Amending Section 4.08.030 of the Borough PO - -to - rovide That a Candidate for Borough Mayor Must Receive at Least 40: of the Votes Cast in the Regular Election or a Runoff Election Must Se Held" (McCahan and Brandon) J. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES (a) Ord. 82-18 "Providing for the Acquisition of Municipal owers cessary to Provide Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services and Facilities in the Borough Outside Cities" (Dimick) _ _. _ __may ' -.• '�.;�{'?�'i , w�Z"�%i'-"ao��`•.-4;r=f:=�;�"^��'i' y«.s��"'1��j'�'�`-`r!Yiw'+�F� .��- y ., ' '��1'f!!�i' ■ ,i Y • r (b) Ord. 82-19 "Limiting the Bo augh's Annual Local Share ppr0pr a ion to th-3 Borough School District Budget to 86,500,000" (Douglas) (c) Ord. 82-20 "P orouroviding That Unallocated Surplus avenu g es 5h81L Be Distributed to Residents the 8orou of (Douglas) rough the Issuance of Share Certificates" (d) Ord. 82.21 "Amending Section 5.16.020 of the Borough ^ri%r"-'•`r%w '• •-• '^-' = o e o rovids a Borough Sales Tax of One Percent (Mc0shan and Fischer) K, CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS �± N (a) Res, 82.33 "Approvin the Contract Document phase for .'Sr::r,,;:;:,� HS%•.::SS: •..__r oj,eto t(Mayor)i) Additions 11982 and Renovation .. (b) Res. 2-34 "Awarding a Contract for the Soidotna High c ectrical 84ekboard Winches Project Electric, Inc," (Mayor) to Rays , 82-11 "Authorizing a Change Order to Ability (e) Resils Ad In�gotioa onde the North AnchoLtLonal r (Mayor) River�Rgoad Prodect" do6�M Resolution ama agiciysiMsistcoynes to various Cappital Improvement Projects Within the Borough '• (Mayor) = . (s) Res. 82-37 "Authorizing the Replacement of Existing er •a *war Lines Parallell%gg Fireweed Avenue and the Lins Immediately North of ' tba Central Peninsula Hospital With Equivalent U%derground Facilities" (Mayor, for CPNSA Board) - :. :'� _'-•. (t) Res. 82a-38 "Allocating Read Desiggnn Grant Funds from • • of Alaska in Aecordanee With the Legislative Intone" (Mayor) _ _ = (9) Res, 82-39 "Authorizing the Borough public Works - epascmen and the School District to Conduct a Study Into the Feasibility of Rehabilitating the Collar Room In the Seward Elementary School for a Civil Defense and Storage Facility" (Crspuehettes) (h) Res. 82.40 "Supporting E,tablishmenpt of a Cooperative Admit nist red cThroughT the Alaskaof municipalLeagalLtLes to ues" _ (Dimmick) i ..�' i=li.f t'ii�.¢3 J... `..±.�jt �3ti".��.' •iw`•I �f J!'.? } O' ../� Y t f� ��,.� .G.r�.b � � t,!u"�j,;ifVk..r1�n;��,7�.T1:.+7T.Cr,.�t�•i'P,y �.�»:j ^• . �•7__' . %Z-,82-41 "Supporting Doris =Y;:,�guest of the Twelfth Alaska Lalature Lot for Mncy Loan an ."Ce 0 3.3 MUlLon Dollars for the Operation I,:nd of the Business Known as $0, catch. aleGshan) Rea. 82-42 "2"A-Af- That the Twelfth (j) SISLat "r, 11fth Alaska Second sLon. Hake a Special Appro riation or Grant for the Purchase of Fighting Equipment fire for the Miski fire Service Area" (Mayor, Request of UySA Board) PENDING LEGISLATION (a) Ord. 81-83 (Limits tax to approval by voters) In committee (b) Ord. 81-119 Amended To Provide for the Award Of Contracts and Purchases Su of plies and Equip- ! meat to Local Resident Bidders I the B id is Not More Than five Percent Higher than the Lowest Non_ Resident Bid" (Fischer) In Finance Cate) (a) Ord. 82-11 "An Ordinance of the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska. Providing for the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds of the Borc h I h Allrelate principal n G'Pal Amount Of Not tOug,,,dt a -5 0.000 to Provide funds Ralufted to Refund Certain Outstanding General Ohl the Borough, Fixing Certain Datafftlon Bonds of 9 of Such Bonds and Authorising Their Sale" (Mayor) % (4) Ord. 82-12 "Rezoninga Portion of Tract A, Swirog Subdivision, Cit . Kenai From Rural Residential MR) To a General Commercial (CC) District" (Mayor. Request Of Planning Commission) (a) Ord. 82-13 "Amandin Section 16 12 010 of the Borough Code of Ordinances to f Aprove an Extension Of the Boundaries of the Nikisk Fire Service Area Subject to Ratification By the Voters Within the Proposed Service Area and Calling S a ecial, Election an the Question" (Mayor, Request Of X;SA) M Ord. 82-14 "Incorporating the Ridgeway Fir* Service Area and the Central Peninsula Emergency Medical Service and Ambulance Service Area into & 81 1 Service Area to Provide Fire and fter ancy glic.1 and Ambulance Service. Calling for a 1pecigl Else_ tLon to Elect a Board Of Directors, and Repealing Chapter 16.36 and Chapter 16.40 of the Borough Code of Ordinance*,, (Davis 6 Fischer) ■ f .•tz, :,;� •... •_• (g) Ord. 82-11 "Repesling Section of the boroughCode of gg2.04.020 ion Relating�olthe Blectiod�dltheSPowerrss c� andDu020 tiesJOf the borough Mayor" (Brandon) (h) Res. 82-30 "Eapressia the Approval and Support of the Assembly to the Distribution of the State's Natural Resource Wealth to Alaskans and for the Enactment of House Bill No. 642 in the Twelfth Legislature, Second Session of the State Legis- lature" (Davis) (Defeated v/Reconsideration) - } •.,, ,,_ � (!) Ord. 81-138 Substitute "Enacting a Revised and -- � Comprehensive Zoning Code for chit Portion of the Borough Lying Within the Boundaries of the City of -• Soldotna" (Defeated v/Reconsideration) - N. FORMAL PRESENTATIONS WITH PRIOR NOTICE UPON MATTERS NOT ON THE MEETING ACENDA � N. MAYOR'S REPORT i r (a) McNeil Canyon Soils Investigation (b) Resurrection River Pedestrian bridge O. OTHER BUSINESS (none) P. ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S CMNENIS - - Q. PUBLIC emosNTS AND PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS UPON NATTERS v NOT CONTAINED IN THE ASSEMBLY'S ACENDA FOR THE MEETING R. INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS _.. S. NOTICE OF NEXT METING AND ADJOURNMENT (March 16, 1982) j - � fl � I i .. M . - - ..r.-.a �. �hr+y'1��!:�:�Sfi'JS��-1,�-5.�1'i�:�.'t'�r � �y � ..tsar i.• +fi:G.�;��t��-r.��:.5 n [ ,T�)/J!7�� _fI�= 6 I 1 (its✓,.y.. 4 CITY OF KENAI Gap" aj 4"„ /. O. BOX NO XENAI, ALAWA 99611 TELEPHONE 283 • 7535 March 2, 1982 TO: Council FROM: Vincent O'Reilly Mayor I wish to place Council on notice that I may be involved in a consulting and/or business relationship with one or several of the fish processors, namely Sea Catch and Salamatof, or others. I will be available for any questions in this regard at any time. Thanks. VOR: jw ti TO: William Brighton, City Manager Charles Brown, Finance Director 1. FROM: tichard Ross, Chief of Police V•Lt,, Walter Winston, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Telephone System in Public Safety Building Re: Capital Budget for FY 82-83 DATE: 2/25/82 RE (JEST: $25,000 be appropriated for General Fund Revenues or Federal Revenue Sharing for purchase of a telephone system for the Public Safety Building. Justification In 1983 the City will no longer be able to lease the present system in the Public Safety Building. We will be required to either purchase the present system at a cost of approximately $15,000 or purchase another system. Our existing system is antiquated by present standards and is not recommended for purchase. A system similar to that presently in City Hall would more adequately meet our present and future needs. Sgt. Kalar in his memorandum of 2/18/82 (see attached) outlines the advantages of the newer system as well as a monthly cost savings of $228 a month were we to purchase It in 1982. Cost estimates of the new system and proposal of cost distri- butions are only approximate at this time and are subject to variance when actual costs are known. RAR/lo TO: Chief Ross FROM: Sgt. Kalar SUBJECTS Telephone System DATES 2-18-82 In 1983 Glacier State Telephone will be deregulated and will require us to purchase a telephone system rather than leasing a system as we presently do. The purchase of the present system we have will be approximately $15,000. This system is not adequate for our present needs and I suggest we do not purchase it. A new system similar to the one presently used by City Hall could provide for our need more effectively. The new system has multiple simultaneous voice intercom allowing more people to use the intercom and also alert people to urgent calls. It will indicate that you have a message waiting. It pro- vides for privacy on calls so no one can interrupt your call. Also a do -not - disturb function stops all calls from coming in to allow someone to work un- disturbed. The dispatcher will be able to know what extensions are being used, on hold, and which line was last put on hold. The system also has memory dialing for each station allowing most frequently called numbers to be dialed in less time. Also with this system it will redial on command the last number dialed in case of a busy signal. The system also has multi -line conferencing allowing several people to talk together on different lines. Night transfers are also available in the system. The cost of the new system is approximately $25,000. This would be broken down as follows: COMMUNICATIONS ......$10,000. POLICE ..............$ 6,500. FIRE .................$ 6,500. JAIL................5 2,000. By purchasing the system we would also save approximately $228.00 per month on our current telephone expenses. This is the cost of leasing the current system. These cost estimates were given to me by Glacier State Telephone and quoted on a tie mesitor 2260 system. � - t ranktin ika 99801 5-1325 O d C%o bP� M l v U LE istATWE BWEAiv #32 February 26, 1982 ITEMS OF INTEREST Municipal Assistance Fund Checks: The Department of Revenue has calculated the Municipal Assistance Fund payments for FY 82. On 2/1/82 checks were mailed to municipalities with calendar year fiscal years. The rest will be mailed June 1. The intent of the payment dates is to allow municipalities to use the funds in the following fiscal year from which it was appropriated so that you would know how much to expect when adopting budgets and setting mill levies. Listed are the amounts you can expect. Anchorage $40,531,910 Juneau $4,525,958 Sitka 1,693,375 Bristol Bay 246,887 North Star Bor. 5,524,841 Haines Borough 144,218 Kenai Pen. Bor. 3,116,804 Ketchikan Gateway 800,474 Kodiak Borough 551,837 Mat -Su Borough 2,915,779 North Slope 1,320,031 Akhiok 20,732 Akiachak 86,159 Akutan 37,479 Angoon 90,643 Barrow 487,674 Bethel 765,307 Cordova 483,276 Dillingham 356,240 Fairbanks 6,085.709 Fort Yukon 124,741 Galena 165,563 Haines 220,453 Homer 571,983 Houston 116,527 Kenai 1,004,073 Ketchikan 1,627,606 King Cove 102,925 Kodiak 1,084,266 Kotzebue 477,285 Larsen Bay 32,906 McGrath 70,935 Napakiak 57,309 Nome 651,868 North Pole 214,195 Old Harbor 66,164 Ouzinkie 33,828 Palmer 502,305 Pelican 36,796 Petersburg 634,966 Port Lions 41,908 St. Mary's 83,738 Sand Point 141,782 Saxman 55,510 Seldovia 104,962 Seward 428,482 Skagway 182,956 Soldotna 584,787 Tanana 93,479 Tenakee Springs 27,403 Unalaska 390,542 Valdez 1,014,311 Wasilla 434,428 Whittier 43,209 Wrangell 500,895 Yakutat 97,418 Legislative Bulletin #32 - page 2 IN COMMITTEE HB 66 - Population Determination: On which establishes the U.S. Bureau of th basis for population adjustments that HB 66 has a further referral to Finance. SENATE BILLS INTRODUCED 2/22/82 }rouse CRA passed out this bill e Census "concept of residence" as the are made for revenue sharing purposes. SSSB 613 - Property Tax Relief: A sponsor substitute has been introduced by Kerttula, Dankworth, Collette and Bradley which eliminates the property tax limit contained in the original bill, which was snaking bond market represen- tatives very nervous. The sponsor substitute requires a reduction from what "it would otherwise levy" of about $17.50 per capita - "at least one-half of the amount it received under Sec. 1, Ch 60, SLA 1981 (SB 168) that exceeds one-half of the entitlement of the municipality under that section". Referred to the CRA Committee. SB 797 - State Aid to Municipalities: Prepared by Kelly's Special Committee on Property Taxation, this bill combines the existing revenue sharing and munici- pal assistance programs into one which distributes funding on a per capita basis, with adjustments for cost of living, instead of the formula which in- cludes local tax effort and assessed value. There are no changes in the reve- nue sharing chapters providing funding for road mileage, health facilities, hospitals, etc. The existing municipal assistance fund (AS 43.20.016) is repealed and there is a five year "hold harmless" provision. Referred to CRA, HESS and Finance. HOUSE BILLS INTRODUCED HB 723 - Aid to Unincorporated Communitiess A sponsor substitute has been introduced by Adams and Montgomery which adds an extension of time during which aid to municipalities may be paid under Ch 60, SLA 1981 (SB 168 grants). The original bill extended the time for only unincorporated communities. After hearings on February 17 and 19, House CRA decided to hold the bill for further discussion on a proposed amendment to clarify the state's ability to offer grants to native village governments. The bill has a further referral to Finance. HB 724 - Appropriation for Unincorporated Communities Aid: A sponsor substitute has been introduced by Adams and Montgomery which extends the lapse dates to June 30, 1983 for FY 82 appropriations for grants paid under Ch 60, SLA 1981 (SB 168) to municipalities and unincorporated communities. It is not a new appropriation. Referred to CRA and Finance. HB 873 - State Land Disposal: Introduced by Randolph, this bill amends the state land disposal program by (1) increasing percentage of subdivision homesits parcels from 10% to 30%, (2) prohibiting requirements to connect to existing water and sewer connections and to mandate municipal provisions of services that are not being provided to adjacent areas, and (3) increasing the maximum size of homesite parcels from 5 acres to 10 acres. It has been referred to Resources, Judiciary and Finance. REVENUE S11ARING/MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE Two proposals have been introduced this session to combine the revenue sharing and municipal assistance programs into one. Neither bill makes any changes to the special revenue sharing entitlements for roads, volunteer fire departments, health facilities, hospitals, etc. Following is comparison of the proposals. Municipal Assistance Fund (1O2 or Greater of Corporate Income Tax) Distribution Formula SB716/HB746 Repeals Current Revenue Sharing Formula Minimum Entitlement $100,000 Unincorporated Communities Transferred to Requirements Hold Harmless Future Funding Levels Amount Needed to trigger bill Rural Development Grants Section Spend 5O% on at least 3 basic services Open -Ended Intent to Increase With Inflation b Population $140,851,300* SB 797 Repeals Per Capita Adjusted for Cost of Living $25,000 $25,000 grant None 5-Years No Intent Language $143,100,000* *The difference between the 2 figures represents the amount currently going to unincorporated communities. Excerpts from report prepared by the Department of Community and Regional Affairs. The Department of Community and Regional Affairs has examined state programs to provide financial assistance to localities in Alaska, with particular emphasis on revenue sharing and municipal assistance and finds the following problems: - Revenue sharing emphasizes tax effort and ability to raise taxes while municipal assistance emphasizes population and tax relief. - Municipal assistance is linked to the declining corporate income tax collections. - Localities are growing increasingly dependent on the state for funding of property tax relief and increased service provision at the same time. - The revenue sharing and municipal assistance programs are administered by two different agencies and have different reporting and accountability requirements. In order to address these problems, the Department proposes the following program: - The municipal assistance statute should be repealed and all funds for this purpose should be distributed through the revenue sharing program. - The minimum entitlement for incorporated entities should be $100,000. Unincorporated entities should be deleted from the program and treated separately. - The entire program should be funded at a level no less than the proposed fiscal year 1983 appropriation. This amount should increase each year by the same percentage that the proposed constitutional spending limit allows the state budget to increase. - The existing Rural Development Assistance Program should be expanded to be a program of assistance to unincorporated communities that requires application on a competitive basis for grants up to $100,000 for capital projects, operation and maintenance of capital projects and community services. Excerpts from report of the Special Committee on Property Taxation. Notwithstanding the considerable attention given to municipal aid programs in recent years, many problems and dissatisfactions continue to exist. The passage of SB 524 during the past legislative session, for example, drastically reduced the source of revenue for the municipal assistance program established under AS 43.20.016. Additionally, the expressed desire of many legislators to reduce or eliminate local taxes through the application of surplus state revenues is contrary to the formula approach for local revenue sharing adopted less than two years ago, which may actually penalize local governments for reductions in locally generated taxes. If the basic premise underlying a local assistance program is that all citizens should share more or less equally in the benefits of the state's surplus revenues, a simple per capita based distribution formula should be developed which will award a base entitlement to each municipality that is generally equal to that municipality's share of the statewide population. In order to reflect differences in the cost of providing government services, a regional cost -of -living allowance (COLA) should be applied in addition to the base entitlement. Also, recognizing the fact that small municipalities may experience higher per capita costs due to economies of scale, a minimum entitlement should be provided to guarantee that each local government receives a meaningful allowance to be used to provide municipal services. Is C Council a Aft go MW OW C4xmdj —Lease Of Sicohner WO at 7 94D. WS110056Y lcMyMff.AM46WAW. - POW W' D.NLVBUWM 'plant agalds foam: - —Float basin ASCHWMW PXMN-, W*Ww'q&%m. TATIM , , t, araluage study. gip - and Im mitbams 'cd Ow'SUM.W.M. —Law utdomat with SwAheentalAir boat ramp E. ADUINISTPATION ,!--Purchs" of COYW F.PURUCCO)OMM r i SIP . T� ,� --- -_ _