The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-04-27 Council Packet - Special MeetingKenai City Council Special Council Meeting April 27, 1982 Candlelight & Paving, Water Linwood & Sewer CITY OF KENAI 40d Cap" 4 4" F. 0. XOX UD MINAS, ALASKA 99611 TILIINOXI 2103 • 7636 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING There will be a special meeting of the Kenai City Council on Tuesday, April 27, 1982 at 600 PM at the City Administration building. Subject will bes Candlelight & Linwood, Paving, Water & Sewer ,,'Janet Whelan City Clerk w F P 1 0 1 o` �s 5 COUNCIL MEETING O COUNCIL MEETING OF CANDLELIGHT PROJECT CERTIFIED PARCEL LAND IMPROVEMENT SQUARE ASSESSMENT _90. NO. VALUE VALUE FT. COST 844772 v.t�045-140-2500 7,500 96,000 22,082 $1,454 844773 'r 045-140-2400 5,350 49,400 12,922 851 844774 +045-150-8900 5,750 19,844 1,307 � w, y� y�`�,� 844775 ✓4�y 045-150-9000 5,750 19,844 1,307 4N � 844775 Vp�%1045-150-0700 11,000 11,600 49,500 3,260 844776 ✓'h 045-150-3600 7,200 20,450 19,872 1,309 844777�/�.�r� 045-150-3700 7,200 19,872 1,309 r �,1 �844778 ✓oj�'�' 045-150-7700 5,800 20,163 1,328 844778 ✓'�,1�,� 045-150-7800 5,800 23,300 20,163 1,328 k 844779 ✓0/30 045-150-2300 11,000 91500 49,500 3,260 844780 ✓ 045-150-2400 11,000 73,800 45,000 2,964 844884 V/ 045-150-3150 49,500 3,260 OWNER John J & Sharon L. Williams Box 13:5, Kenai y p6 p 'Lot 1, Sharon L. Dan V. Dacus Box 3319, Kenai Lot 2, Sharon L. Donna M. Roper Box 48, Kenai Lot 1, Roper Subdv. Frank R & Charlene Getty Box 3863, Kenai Lot 2, Roper Subdv. Frank R & Charlene Getty Box 3863, Kenai .3 7 K a -7 Lot 134 Florine McCollum Box 3293 Lots 3 & 6 Roper Subdv. Glen R McCollum Drawer 3293, Kenai ?:ate i Lots 4 & 5 Roper Subdv. Roy & Claudine Wright Box 95, Kenai Candlelight Subdv., Lot 1 Roy & Claudine Wright 3 �4r a Box 95, Kenai Candlelight Subdv:, Lot 4 Robert & Barbara McMillian Box 8, Kenai Lot 161 Arthur & Patricia McComsey Box 1319, Kenai Lot 160 Cook Inlet Region 2525 C Street, Anchorage Lot 172 r CANDLELIGHT PROJECT CERTIFIED PARCEL LAND IMPROVEMENT SQUARE ASSESSMENT i NO. NO. VALUE VALUE FT. COST OWNER 844091 ✓�,{045-080-0600 2,500 15,350 1,375 $ 91 Roy L. & Avis M. Hayes. Route 3, Kenai j ,Govt Lot 43 844092 ✓ 045-100-0300 5,600 12,200 16,645 1,096 Robert C. & Carol F. Dolan Box 419, Kenai Govt. Lot 51-N 165 of E 165 844093 045-100-0720 99,000 6,519 State of Alaska Pouch C, Juneau SEhSEkNW4 844094 ✓ 045-100-0400 6,000 14,900 21,780 1,434 James H. Doyle Box 582, Kenai ; ✓ Govt. Lot 51-SE 165 of E 165 844765 045-100-0600 15,000 6,000 42,000 2,766 Myrtle May Black Route 1, Coleman OK 73432 ; 1 Govt. Lot 61 844766 ✓�D 045-120-2200 8,850 11,700 19,204 1,265 Raymond Wade & Lila A. Pace Box'306, Kenai Pace Subdv.#1, Lot 2 844093,/ 045-120-0320 49,500 3,260 State of Alaska Pouch C, Juneau NEhNEhNEkSWh (5 ac) ; 844767045-120-2300 5,800 16,000 20,020 1,318 Tommy Messer ' P.O. Box 1775, Kenai 844768 ✓i4045-120-0500 5,850 20,750 20,944 1,379 Pace Subdv. # 1, Lot 3 i Frank D. & Judith A. Peters P t i Box 1743, Kenai i '�� 'v045-120-0600 N 165 of E 165, Govt Lot 90 844769 9,800 21,300 1,403 Gerald L. Ekman 7405 49th Av. E. Tacoma WA q� Govt Lot 90 844770.,r1'e�'045-140-0400 11,000 49,500 3,260 Wm & Jill Burnett Box 1022, Kenai � % Lot 109 844770 ✓�'•�'045-140-0500 11,000 82,000 49,500 3,260 Wm. & Jill Burnett Box 1022, Kenai 644771 ✓ 045-140-0900 11,000 7,000 49,500 3,260 Lot 108 Gordon & Rosalie Beeks Box 3026, Kenai 3`�(07% Lot 118 J CANDLELIGHT PROJECT I CERTIFIED PARCEL LAND IMPROVEMENT SQUARE ASSESSMENT i NO. NO. VALUE VALUE FT. COST OWNER 844885 �p'��,;�'� 045-150-3200 11,000 32,700 49,500 $3, 200 Dale Neether Box 4345, Kenai Lot 173 iy i 0 .ti�au�.%• -�-��..r...,,..��..i�+-_ --1+a11'- -�-aa:�.. .J4.• - - .a.nna.�..rr�.-.��.� I..r._•'-_`��=_,,,ir" El LINWOOD PROJECT CERTIFIED PARCEL LAND IMPROVEMENT SQUARE ASSESSMENT NO. NO. VALUE VALUE FT. COST OW14ER h eI/ ✓t�%045-150-3000 23,800 49,500 Anderson 844887 �' 11,000 $3,281 Ronald & Delores Box 3069, Kenai Govt. Lot 171 844888✓ 045-150-2900 11,000 77,300 49,500 3,281 Wilford & Betty Mattfield Box 269, Kenai :?; y b 7 Govt. Lot 170 844318045-150-2100 11,000 15,500 45,000 2,983 Roy E. Hoyt, III Box 1521, Soldotna i� 844887✓�,\-1045-150-2200 11,000 49,500 3,281 Lot 163 Ronald & Delores Anderson '�?i� Box 3069, Kenai ✓ Lot 162 844320 045-150-4600 5,100 30,000 13,231 877 Terry Messer Box 4403, Kenai Lot 1, Helen Jones 844321 ✓ 045-150-4700 5,100 13,241 878 Robert & Dorothy Gregory Box 19, Kenai Lot 2, Helen Jones �1r ;�''" 844321 \045-150-4800 5,100 36,300 13,326 877 Robert & Dorothy Gregory s Box 19, Kenai 3-70 (o Lot 3, Helen Jones 844322 045-150-7000 6,400 31,400 15,900 1,054 Dale Coreson Box 112, Soldotna Hood $2, Lot 3 844323 ✓ 045-150-7100 6,300 18,300 15,000 994 W. L. Hood Box 873, Kenai Hood #2, Lot 2 844324✓ 045-150-7200 6,250 53,850 14,100 935 Wm. Hood Box 873, Kenai Hood #2, Lot 1 844325JD Qt4"645-150-6400 7,600 66,400 22,500 1,491 John & Roxie Jackson 3, Route 2, Kenai Jackson, Lot 1 be - Routt--3ry-Kensi- & Connie 844327✓�1,.j�045-150-0500 15,000 21,500 49,500 3,281 Wayne Wilson Box 20, Kenai Lot 136 3 K 33 i I, p , April 16, 1982 TO : FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF KENAI %Od (?aja" 4 4" I.O. 80X $10 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TILIPNON! 493 • MI C'U 5 T W ry` G I; it 6 .; C' I- .- ,} r.J'A, ; t,• ec 5 r rr ,'r >r 1 Sa •, - Z e c a rn,e ,Z'Arif :%' l.:•ef. 4 /IdE•' Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works Candlelight/Linwood, Water and Sewer Cost Alternatives If the Council decides to do.any water or sewer on Candlelight or Linwood then the City should.star —all over on the road project. Candlelight and Linwood Road estimate , .el' 434,000 .,CANDLELIGHT ALTERNATIVES Water: (Attachment,) A) Spur to E. -Allak4ii6�' y 36' 960 - t; B) E. Aliak to Kiana more 36, 960 C) E. Aliak to ,Kaknu 4whW' i�l��i� 73,976 1., D) E. Aliak to MulhollandONNOW+110 ,992 E) E. Aliak to Fiddler �146,608 F) E. Aliak to Linwood 183,624 G) 100a 00*=00"' 220,584 Sewer: A) B) �n C) D) E) (Attachment C) Candlelight 4 E. Aliak,i.. 47 334 Candlelight & Kaknu son. 88,690 Mulholland to Fiddler.,.. 43,071 (dead) Mulholland to Tinker 147,920 100% ($211,729 +• 72,21S) 283,944 TOTAL 'l► L q4 tJ? 07 J N. i Demo to Wm. J. Brighton Page 2 April 16, 1982 LINWOOD ALTERNATIVES Water: (Attachment D) A) Kaknu to Aurora N.0mm. $ 45,609 B) Kaknu to Terminus man/m 89,493 CI, yL Q 1004.r...MM 180,849 Sewer: (Attachment B) A) Aurora to Kaknu s.rmu` 36 79S 0 B) Aurora to Terminus (dead) &==P 38 , ll 5 a Q Aurora T,#v & to Lawton ,mar 110,330 D) 1001 147,125 TOTAL 61P 7 0� H i �i%i'L:►'GFi LA�R►'GtQ 2Oa�i.- CY ( s �X tsT�n/G Ca Ai D ITI ONS ._ tiVATart y F LsfWYvN F IDA t 104 KM L) i a ,i k� r CANOLEL/GfiT V.Propt ' 0 39391.E o �n &o&m Fsr a Onpl.L p 1 r klm NA fflR KN c1 �j f i � v► 4,4W7'bN i `-RA �I .,_ C A ND zxv aHT Seweg L - "3a 1 1- F vo 6900.6o Fs r � s 4 9c F i� uo � ao (� O E AG /109 k If �Iz A-WKvW 3� 4/�/a" .o'eAOk-A -, r L�NO WATEi2 o%6ot / LF i f R v No 41 a� 2� c: V � � � /Jfip'1� i � •" f 1 a ` � �g1t3S6 M j 46. fiG /109 k -- `, 4—'— � y/rs�/au ii - SWIM* (o 75 Rove-o esr= $1 rslcr ------ W-irrot —.—.Scwcp. v( 4111$16" A4,01CMICA11— i CITY OF KENAI %Od eap" 4 4" F. O. SOX UO KENAI. ALASKA 99611 ME/NONE 283 ^ 7635 March 12, 1982 e TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager FROM: Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Water and Sewer - Candlelight and Linwood As you directed, I have included Linwood" "in this cost analysis since a major portion of Linwood's-lines would have to be constructed in order to provide_servAce to Candlelight. The contractor has given me the following figures that we requested in our meeting with him;on March.9,,-1982. ,dam •, `. '' ,Cost,,to purchase the*contract back from . tjhe contractor: $201004 -.Buy contract 24,000 -'Purchase his culvert $44,000 - .Total t•;t"'' Additional cost over and •above" -the, bid•pr ce. if the f' contractor was to leave out items ;that would be done by a different contractor installing the later and sewer: -- $15,200 (Cost '138,200 for a bid cost of $123,000) J i L' ,1# If we were to buy back the contract and rebid the project and include water and sewer, I am sure we would receive at least 40 percent higher unit prices. This project was bid September 14, 1981, and the contractor did some of the pit work right away. The low bidder was P R & S at $295,760 with the next bidder, Quality Asphalt Paving, at $336,885 ($41,125 higher). This second bidder was 14 percent higher. The next round•)of projects went out for bid in December, 1981, and - we received 20 percent higher unit prices. That is 20 percent higher in three months and during the winter shutdown period. The construction contractors in Alaska are going to be extremely busy next season. I understand that there are six major projects I u W II 1 1 i 1 . 1 t f 1 i i r Mr: Wm. J. Brighton Page 2 March 12, 1982 being bid next week from DOT alone. The Municipality of Anchorage, Mat -Su Borough, and the Kenai Peninsula Borough all have many road projects being bid also. The contractors can pick and choose the projects, bid high prices with high profits, and if they don't gec the job go for the next one. I think that we will see prices skyrocketing. We were way ahead of most everyone with bidding our projects. The City Council had our projects already engineered so that we could go out for bid immediately after receiving the State Legislative funding. The contractors bid on our projects first while everyone else was still working on engineer designs. COST OF WATER AND SEWER Wince, Corthell, Bryson has come up with the following estimate. Linwood: Water - $181,198 for 2621 LF + appurt. _ $69/LF Sewer - $146,111 for 2665 LF + appurt. - $S5/LF Candlelight: Water - $219,029 for 3939 LF + appurt. _ $56/LF Sewer - $210,106 for 4321 LF + appurt_. _ $49/LF TOTAL COST - $756,444 7 TOTAL LENGTH 13,546 LF AVE. UNIT COST - $S6/LF 5/.0 These prices do not include regrading, finishing, and salvaging gravel - merely the water and sewer lines. WHERE CAN WE GET THE ADDITIONAL FUNDS? We have appropriated all of the State Legislative funds that we received to projects. All of the road projects have been bid, and we only allocated a 5 percent contingency. This contingency is down to almost nothing on the projects since the surveying costs came in so much higher (Union surveying from now on). We will probably be receiving State Legislative money in the future, but we do not know how much or when. Chances are that it will be too late to do much work during the construction season which will leave this area in the mud another year. If we do choose to use this money, then our priorities have changed and something else on the CIP list will have to be dropped. Projects amounting to $894,744 would have to be dropped. ADEC has no funding available to help pay for any projects. r. Itv.1w:.. . /A• fan - - Tf 5• n Mr. Wm, J. Brighton Page 3 March 12, 1982 WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER PROJECTS? A. Water line down N. Lupine, N. Dogwood B. Water and sewer on Second, Third, and Spruce C. Water and sewer on Aliak, McCollum, Cinderella, Fox, Princess, and Linwood Extended D. Water in Thompson Park Subdivision E. Water and Sewer on Evergreen, Haller, McKinley F. Water on Standard, Richfield, Thompson Place G. Other water and sewer lines requested by citizens and on list that is attached COST ANALYSIS Road Improvements Present Contract Cost: $295,760 Benefit: Candlelight and Linwood would have good year-round, passable roads by August 1, 1982 Road, Water, and Sewer Improvements uwk alb Cost: Road Work Estimate $ 295,760 lee e) + 40% cost increase since September 118,300 Buy Old Road Contract 20,000 Install Water & Sewer 756,444 TOTAL $1,190,504 V'p'�jG G Benefit: Candlelight and Linwood would have good year-round, passable roads by mid -summer 1983 and approximately 16 residences would have the opportunity to hook up to Water and Sewer. The additional cost for Water and Sewer per resident would be $47,278 per resident. past' b �'�c'• �/ 7 G P�s`a Foi � M - WATER UT.1061101,1* EST, isRT 1FWkD )i PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEWER LENGTH INSPECTION COUBTRUCTTON UNIN. (1011116. T(WAL t COST (177..) U)ST 00%) COST • Nalco Chemical W 40A0' $ 27,200 $ 169,000 $ 500 $ 1(i,000 $ 203,700 _- S 4600' 49-L6/1q 292.000 500 29.Z1�0 371.340 76,840 452,000 1000 45,200 575,040 *Grace Brethren Church W 990, 9,180 54,000 500 5,400 69,080k (McCollum 6 Spur) McCollum Street W 1340' 11,560 68,000 500 6,800 86,860 (to Aliak) Alink Drive W 1000, 6,800 40,000 250 4,000 51,050 (McCollum to Spur) 0 1000' 7.650 45.000 250 4.500 57.400 14,450 85,000 500 8,500 108,450 Cinderella, Prineees, Monk W 4600' 31,280 184,000 500 18,400 234,180 (in between) S 4600' 35.190 201.000 500 20.700 263.390 66,470 391,000 1000 39,100 497,570 *First Assembly of God W 400' (Princess Lane) S 400' 5,780 34,000 500 3,400 43,680* East Kenai Church of God W 800' 5,440 32,000 250 3,200 40,890 Naar Spur - between 8 800` 6,120 3 250 3,600 45,970 E. Aliak and Spur 11,560 68,000 500 6,800 86,860 Sever Crossing at 1111amna 8 90, 3,060 18,000 250 1,800 23,110 Water to Dust Bowl W 2800' 19,040 112,000 500 11,200 142,740 (Between Airport Way b Princess) .1,r _ -_- _ _ _ _ - ..- _ _ _ __ I .-_- _ ---_ _ _ _--r-lb�_• l 1 , 1 • I , WATER EST. ENGINEER EST. LrBTIMATBD 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEWER LENGTH INSPECTION CONSTRUCTION ADMIN. CONTG. 'TOTAL . ! COST (17%) COST (10%) COST i Aurora Street W 500, $ 3,400 $ 20,000 $ 250 2,000 i $ 25,650 (Off Linwood) S 500' 3t,825 22,500 250 2.25Q 2�25 7,225 42,500 S00 �4,250 54,475 Candlelight & Linwood W 3900' 26,520 156.000 500 13,600 jy,;y„ 198,620 S 3900' 29,835 175,500 500 17,550 223.385 /s6 3 70 56,355 331,500 1000 33,150 ��io� �,�� 22,00 i Valhalla 11ts. (N. Dogwood W 8700 59,160 348,000 1000 34,800 442,960 N. Lupine, Phillips, Standard, Richfield) Thompson Park (Firewood, " Togiak, Eioonhower, Iowa. Nevada, Wildrose, Dogwood W 11400' 77,520 456,000 1000 45,600 580,120 r Primrose, Forget-me-not, . Fern, Lupine) Evergreen, Haller, W 9400' 63,920 376,000 500 37,600 478,020 I McKinley, & 4th. S 9400' 7_1 910 423,000 500 42,300 537.710 135,830 799,000 1000 79,900 1,015,730 u s; { Spruce, 2nd, 6 3rd f (Spruce - 4th to Spur, W 3000' 20,400 120,000 250 12,000 152,650 2nd & 3rd - Spruce S 3000' 22,950 135,000 250 13,500 171,700 to Birch) 43,350 255,000 1000 25,500 324,850 *Not needed if associated streets are done i i I I I J� 1 1 I ifs ! 1 i KE.NAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING APRIL 21, 1982 '.. Partial Tranulation P-2 Water a Bower, Candlelight i Linwood :% �r/1,' :ai.�•..'w .,_:r :� u•�- ' Councilman Wine said he questions the numbers, The rM.•rr�sr•'...�....� ;•n sewer on Linwood in a duplicate of the sewer on �•r',5��--��•••• Candlelight. Public works Director Kornolis explained « ouch individual portion was taken separately, ila had attempted to show all alternatives so if they have a cost he can give them alternatives, Councilman Wise yw s..:,,�..••..;«..: 7 suggested if we put in water i sower with water to Fiddler or Lawton, and put in dead sewer lines, the cost would be 0527,000. Then if we ran water i sewer across to Tinker, we would have an additional $233,000. The whole project would be $760,000. if we left Fiddler to Tinker water i nowor undone at this time we could eliminate the cost by $233,000. It is desirable to loop water but does not have to be done. Also regarding the sower, because we are putting in road, if we put in sower but did not connact,it would be a dead lino but would be in. Next year, when DEC funds are available we could activate the lines. Councilman Wagoner said Council need to address the % fact that there is a contract to do roads only. it would be expensive to enter into negotiations with y: �,••.a-,,.. ; the contractor or you are going to have 2 contractors •njy.�.;r r! :'' "! ...•r on the job at the servo time. That or you will have to stop the project and ro-bid the job. Alternatives area ' 1. You can go on as is. 2. Buy the contractor off, create water 1, sower district and start over ' r-� : {:•,,,; ,.�� , ...... 3. Stop the project and do it with City funds .!%' '�"' •.; • Public W rks Director Kornolia said he would recommend a �= -'Pr'' • Causal, cano 1 ho road pro act and start over. '•�,.rlr,../J 1w. (�47 �M I� i i tyayM :. MOTIONS Councilwoman Click moved, seconded by Councilman _,_ . ;nrw ;,„,,:•, ; Mueller, that at this Point in time we cancel our current road project contract and ra-bid the project ". in its entirety, including water i sower and roads. At which time we would also hold those funds in aboyanco in a special account. } Councilman Wagoner said we should not spend the funds, �.-�:,•;•;,,•�, the people need roads fixed. They should be hold and "':;;.'• .,, specifically earmarked for road improvements. They y; should not be shorted. Councilman Wise asked, was r.'•-" .. 1 the road contract for both Candlelight and Linwood? Kr, Kornelis replied both. We have 0295,000 with 5% in contingency. If we went out to bid they would be 40% higher. We would have to come up with additional - .. money. VOTES Motion passed, with Mayor O'Reilly voting no. Public Works Director Kornolis asked, is he to got &hold of the engineer and go out to bid prior to - — allocation of funds? Councilwoman Glick noted, we have design work done, do we have to go through the - - process again? Could the City do it? Mr. Kornolis replied, we could, but It would take considerable amount of time, With Council approval, he will contact Wince, Cortholl & Bryson and have them combined. Council- man Nalfiton asked if he had a ball park figure. Mr, Kornelis replied, loss than 110,000. Councilman Wise . noted there are no DEC funds available at this time, tie would like to consider separating sewer on Lawton/ Fiddler, putting in dead lines and delaying one year. r r3re`•1.. KM 4 KENAI CITY COUKCI4 Partial Translation, April 21, 1982 Page 2 Perhaps DEC funds will be available. That is $500,000 in itself. We are looking at an additional $650,Oo0 of City funds. Councilman Wagoner said he feels we need to take a good long look at the project. This is not the only area we are improving that needs water i sewer. We have talked about assessment districts for 3 years. The City would be spending $650,000 to develop this property. Th(�npson Park also has contaminated wells. Council should take a look at putting water b sewer in one area and not another. He would feel com- fortable with assessment districts, some of the people have already been assessed. City Manager Brighton noted they will not be assessed for the other side. Council- woman Glick said this was an oversight that water a sewer was not included in the project. We did do engineering on this and during discussion of Capital Improvement Projects, Council agreed they did not need this. The people thought it was included. We have had considerable testimony regarding water in this area. We have heard considerable development was available if they had water i sewer. Maybe we should start dealing with section after section. Councilman Wise said we really got active in this issue recently. We were told it would cost $300,000, now we hear it will cost $750,000. We thought DEC funds were available, now they are not. A need has been demonstrated, there is a pollution problem. He would like to see the project moved but only where there is a need. He would suggest we ask for State fund- ing. We can at least try. Also, submit a grant applica- tion for connecting links for future funding. We have to put in a request well in advance. Councilman Mueller asked, are the stub -outs to property included? Mr. Kornelis replied, no, that is the responsibility of the property owners. Councilman Mueller asked, if it is not done when the road is built, it would have to be torn up again? Mr. Kornelis replied yes. Councilwoman Glick asked, given the nature of the area and high water table, would it not be advantageous to do it in one fell swoop and not be done over again? She would like to have some consideration for stub -outs be put in. MOTION, Reconsiderations Councilman Wagoner moved for notice of reconsideration at the next meeting. Councilman Wagoner explained we have not considered the repercussions of this action. $126,000 additional is a negative impact on the project. For $126,000 we could negotiate water i sewer in there a lot cheaper than rebidding the road work again. Mr. Kornelis said negotiation could not be done for water s sewer. We'd be tripling the cost of the road. The public would complain. Councilman Wagoner noted, the public has a right to complain if the City makes a $126,000 mistake. Councilwoman Glick said we postponed this from the last meeting. If we continue another 2 weeks we are getting further from construction. Our Capital Im- provement Projects have emphasized roads, water and sewer. we have monies coming to us on July 1, 1982. If this holds up, we would not be jeopardizing additional jobs. She asked City Manager Brighton if he had any recommendations. Mr. Brighton said it is obvious at this point there are all sorts of ways we can go, vie cannot advertise the contract till we have money appropriated. If Council decides it is necessary, we will have to do as proposed and wait till July 1, 1982 for money from the State. Then we can petition on the basis of safety and sanitation to do this instead of the gym and other projects. He noted we will have to eat considerable amount of money KENAI CITY COUNCIL Partial Translation, April 21, 1982 Page 3 if we re -bid this project. His most important emphasis is that we not deplete present fund balances but use State funds. He asked Mr. Kornelis, could this be done if we receive money from Juneau after July? Mr. Kornelis replied, no, if Juneau took the same amount of time they did last year, we cannot do it this year. Mr. Brighton said $250 per capita will be distributed immediately this year. Mr. Kornelis said the contractor would like to start in one week. He has 4 months to do the road. If we wait till July and add water i sewer we would have to go into next year. it also depends on the weather. We could use City money and go out to bid right away. Councilman Wagoner said in that case maybe we should go down to 410 on the priority list and move that forward, take care of it this year and insert Candlelight/Linwood at that level and it should take care of itself. #14 will probably be cut off this year. He didn't think anyone wants to go through a road project 1/2 done. Councilwoman Glick said she does propose to deplete available funds, but there are some funds available that we could make some adjust- ments. As to the $250 per capita, that was appropriated last year, but was not to be distributed till July 1. Last year it was a new appropriation, this year they will be better prepared. Councilman Wise said as to funds available, we have Federal Revenue sharing that is a legitimate use. The City has between estimated fund balance in water i sewer capital reserve fund, over $1.1 Million. Add to that funds from Federal Revenue Sharing, you have more than enough to complete the project. If we don't operate soon, we will not do the project. Funds are not sacred when public health is at stake. Money is not more important than public health and safety. Councilman Wagoner said; regarding the quality of water. He had not heard that wells were contaminated, just that they smelled and looked bad. If public health had established a hazard, we might be able to go for special funding. Frank Getty. He will have a report on contamination Apr 1 2 . He cannot understand Council cancelling the contract. He asked Mr. Kornelis if the City can sub- contract. Mr. Kornelis replied yes. Mr. Getty asked, can the City have another contractor come in at the same time and do water i sewer? Mr. Kornelis replied, there is nothing in the contract, but we turn the road over to the contractor when work is being done. We are leaving ourselves open to lawsuits. Mr. Getty asked, how much will it cost to run water to his house? Mr. uornelis replied, about $56 a foot. Mr. Getty said, the Council is talking about this thing and then run water out to Section 36 to develop. It has been out there for one year and you have not sold any land. He paid for his portion of that. We have to boil water to use and cannot develop the property across the street. He would like to pay for his own water line. John Williams. At the time of the Capital Improve- ment projects, Candlelight/Linwood was #1 project on the 80-81 grant. Last year it was tl. This has been I waiting for some time without water s sewer. The people d in the area have determined a need for water & sewer. 3 In the 82 82 apital Improvement project, lst s 2nd f Street pavPnq is listed. They are not that well traveled. Lupine, Fern, Togiak paving is listed. Water & Sewer in high density should be given higher priority. VIP project is a relatively new subdivision. ` But Candlelight is an old area and we have had to walk E home during Break -Up. He doubt other areas have had r M •.:vim„^::t. •�.��."..'U.'.-1: �� .M..:r •.. `.....:..r� .1� vas.- �« ��+�*=:sr�:,.• KENAI CITY COUNCIL Partial Translation, April 21, 1982 Page 4 to walk home. Perhaps the paving projects could be put aside for water a sewer in these areas. Councilwoman Glick referred to Councilman Wagoner's motion of last meeting, the City Manager was directed to bring back a proposal for a plan for water i sewer in affected areas, funding, delaying the gym, 2 year phasing, and use of capital improvement funds this year. Mr. Brighton replied, the proposals were made so Council could make the decision which way they will go. Mr. Kornelis said the information was passed out at the work session last niqht (4-20-82). The City will have to dip into capital reserve funds. To do it this year we would have to cut the size of the project or cancel other projects. He noted with Councilman Wise's proposal, we are still up to $900,000. Councilwoman Glick asked, do we have monies in Water & Sewer? We have a variety of funds we could take money from without depleting balances. Finance Director Brown reviewed his report to Council. The bottom line is $1.3 Million available. Mr. Kornelis' project is $1.26 Million. Mr. Kornelis said, as to walking in at Break -Up. We can go ahead with the project for $295,000. If water i sewer is desired, it could be done at a later date. He added, we had a super price on the road. Councilwoman Glick said water i sewer was deleted from the project and we made an error. Whether we like it or not, we have identified a necessity. Are the other projects cast in concrete and cannot be changed? Atty. Delahay said the posture the City is in right now, the con- tractor wants a decision right now. The reconsider- ation would move it forward 2 weeks. If the contractor moves equipment in and we cancel, it will cost us far more than $120,000. Mr. Brighton said, had we known then what we know now, we would not be in this position. There were numerous public hearings. Council make a decision based on information avail- able. Now we find ourselves in a dilemma. He noted the Finance Director has given us figures that say we can do the project but we will deplete present funds. Municipal Aid are monies that are undesignated and will come July 1, 1982. Councilman Wagoner asked, how would that affect present funds? Mr. Brighton replied, interest is lost on funds drawing interest but we draw interest till we expend funds. The loss will be minimal. Finance Director Brown said the money available after July 1 can be used for large projects. Council would have to use some kind of restraint, we would have to expend capital improvement money over 5 year period on capital projects. MOTION, Immediate Reconsziderations Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, for immediate reconsideration and withdrew his request for reconsideration at next meeting. Councilman Wagoner said we could have people at every meeting asking us to change our Capital Im- provement Projects. VOTE, Reconsiderations Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Wiae moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, to delete the portion relating to'Lawton KENAI CITY COUNCIL Partial Translation, April 21, 1982 Pago 5 to Fiddler, roduuo the project cost from 0760,000 .:�>........�_��. :..._ ,:.;� to $527,000 on the water 1. newer portion. Councilman wise explained, the reanon for deletion is, if we delay, it will not affect the basic project - 71 and will be available for DEC funds. Now the road work is planned in that area. fie would prefer we do otter areas rather than go back and do it over. Councilwoman Glick asked, would he conslder it as an alternative? Councilman wise replied, the reason is it would come out of the hip pocket of the City. It would lower the cost about 6230,000. VOTE, Amendments Notion passed, with Councilman wagoner voting no. VOTE, Hain Motion with Amendments Notion passed, with Councilman wagoner voting no. Councilwoman Glick asked that Adminiatration prepare tho necessary appropriating ordinance for introduction 1 `""'='�� ,•,,: at the next Council meeting. Councilman Wiso asked the a grant application be prepared from DEC. The - - grant request was for additional completion phase F of the project. Councilman Mueller said he would like to see proof of contamination in the letter to DEC. John Williams. He would like to cover the contamina- tion and m nerai content In the tests. All the residents could got their samples together and submit them to the laboratory in Anchorage. Mr. Kornolis agreed and added this could be done in the area. Councilman Measles asked, is he State cortified? Mr. Kornolis replied yes. of Whelan, city C or s J