Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-04-06 Council PacketCOUNCIL PACKETS 1993 APRIL Kenai City Council Meeting Packet April 6, 1983 W .. AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING APRIL 69 1983 - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD C. PUBLIC HEARINGS Rcaclution 83-37 - Requesting 13th Legislature of State of Alaska to Defeat SO 154 entitled "An Act Repealing the Municipal Exemption Option to Public Employment Relations Act." 6-1. Resolution 83-38 - Transfer $1,720 to Purchase a Chlorinator in Well House #1. 3. Resolution 83-39 - Setting a Date of Public Hearing on Proposed Wesbet Circle Assessment District. 4. Resolution 83-40 - Transfer $2,750 to Hire Employee to Renovate Concession Stands and Little League and Softball Fields. (jam 5. Resolution 83-41 - Special Election for Purpose of mending Section 7-3 of Charter - Deleting Limitation of Special Assessment Levies to 25% of Fair Cash Market Value of Property. ". Resolution 83-42 - Supporting Concept of a Sheltered Workshop and Living Quarters Facility for Handicapped in Central Peninsula Area and Request for Legislative Funding. �Q 7. Resolution 83-43 - Establishing Regulations, Rental Rates and Cleaning Deposit Amounts for Main Room and Kitchen of Fort Kenay. 8. Resolution 83-44 -Transfer $11,334 to Award a Contract to Alaska Fence Company for New Fencing and Rehabilitating tie Old Fence. Resolution 83-45 - Awarding the Bid for 4,440 C.Y. of Gravel to Better Concrete Products - $19,980. ,� . Resolution ofAirportSecur6AwardingContract toConstruction ityFencing-1983toAlaskaFenceCompany- L/(� $1579497.70. ,)11. Resolution 83-47 - Request to Legislature to Defeat SO 115 and HB 200 re: Rights of Peace Officers. , 42. Resolution 83-48 - Accepting a Deed of Release from FAA for Parcel of Land Lying Within SW 1/4 of Sec. 33. Resolution 83-49 - Transfer $800 for Membership Dues and Other Misc. Expenses for City Manager. 1 ■ Agenda - April 6, 1983 Meeting 14. Resolution 83-50 - Transfer $45,252 for Metal Siding on Yr Existing Airport Terminal Building. Is. Change Order #3 - Airport Renovation - Metal Siding $57,097.00. II. Change Order # 3 - Airport Renovation - Exterior Painting $7,491.00. D. MINUTES 1. Proposed Jail Facility, March 3, 1983. 2. Regular Meeting, March 16, 1983 3. Partial Translation, Regular Meeting, March 16, 1983. E. CORRESPONDENCE F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $19000 3. Ordinance 848-83 - Increasing rev/appne in Jail Special Revenue Fund by $69500 as a result of Contract Increase from State of Alaska. 4. Ordinance 849-83 - Increasing rev/sppns by $270 as a Result of Donation for a Combination Stretcher Chair for Kenai Fire Department Ambulance. 5. Ordinance 850-83 - Increasing rev/appns $12,950 and Transferring Additional $21,265 in Senior Center Capital Project Fund for Paving of Parking Lot. 6. Ordinance 851-83 - Dedicating the Use of Tract B, Park ` + View Subdivision, for Purpose of Constructing a Shelter for Battered Women. 1 7. Ordinance 852-83 - Creating a New Commission Entitled J. "Advisory Library Commission" By Enacting a New Title 24 to the Kenai Municipal Code. 6. Discussion - HEM and LACK Projects - DEC Funding. n 9. Discussion TAMS - Small Boat Harbor - Financial Analysis and Outline Design - $135,600. 10. Change Order #5 - North Kenai Spur Water and Sanitary Sewer. e6p11. Inspection Engineering Contract (Winco-Corthell-Bryson) -' LACK Project. s 12. Approval of Single Audit. 13. Assignment of Lease - Roth/Pitts. �J14. Inspection Engineering Contract (Mike Tauriainen) HEM } •Project. [ z3 � 1 2 1 x 7W w Agenda - April 6, 1983 Meeting r H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney — T-e ?\sa &. Q�„kw, \s,0 r a 3. Mayor -- �.o-,.+vw1 "1'ti,. / +� ^-Q y fir, .e 4. City Clerk - U S. finance Director 6. Planning do Zoning 7. Harbor Commission S. Recreation Commission , l I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD P ADJOURNMENT W 3 i I I COUNCIL MEETING OF OF e% I OEM JL7ti170■� 17�I �Li��I Wo/7■fin r�►�rr���►io�ir r�o►�o� �■�� common BROBBROMM �.�iui�i��r�i�r�iir°i'iiiii COUNCIL MEETING OF 2(y,.-c� xp C-/ Suggested by: City Council / CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA REQUESTING THE THIRTEENTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TO DEFEAT S8 154 ENTITLED "AN ACT REPEALING THE MUNICIPAL EXEMPTION OPTION TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT" AS BEING SPECIAL INTEREST LEGISLATION AND NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC OR THE STATE OF ALASKA. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai, through its duly elected Mayor and City Council did opt out of the Alaska Public Employees Relations Act in 1972 and reiterated in 1974 their action taken in 1972 and while on both occasions the public including the municipal employees had an opportunity at public hearings on both of those occasions to make their desires and interests known, and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on SO 154 on the 10th day of March in Juneau, the Governor's representative indicated that labor relations activities are more effectively maintained at the local level, and WHEREAS, municipal officials have been given the power to govern and administrate by the local electorate having expressed confidence by the ballot in their local elected officials that they will act in a responsible and frugal manner in behalf of the electorate, and WHEREAS, any additional costs borne by local government would have to come from the local tax base in the form of increased taxes to carry out the mandates of SB 154 at the local level, and WHEREAS, some supporters of SO 154 are employees of the Municipality of Fairbanks where there exists a local problem they are trying to resolve by state legislation, and ' WHEREAS, the chief supporters of SO 154 are the unions of the State of Alaska who see an opportunity to bolster their shrinking membership roles and fill their depleted campaign coffers through their PAC (Political Action Committees) to wield yet more power - - in the political arena and whose sole purpose is the welfare of their membership and not the health or welfare of the state, and � 1 t' WHEREAS, the paosage of SO 154 will create an awesome burden on the state and local municipalities in the form of additional personnel to administer the act and additional red -tape for both branches of government that will cause delays, confusion and in some cases adversary relationships where there now exists compatibility and tranquility as a result of years of mutual relationships on behalf of the constituency involved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that said Council go on record urging the Thirteenth Legislature of the State of Alaska to defeat SB 154 on the basis that it appears not to be in the best interests of the citizens of the state of Alaska but is in fact an enhancement of the private interests within this state at the expense of the state's constituency at large, and further than immediately after the adoption of this resolution, the Clerk of the City of Kenai shall mail copies thereof to Governor William J. Sheffield, the Chairman and Vice -Chairman of the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee; Senators Elisson and Rodey, the Chairman and Vice -Chairman of the House Labor and Commerce Committees; Representatives Walt Furnace and Rich Uehling and in addition, copies to Senators Don Gilman, Paul Fischer, Representatives Hugh Malone, Milo Fritz, Bette Cato and further that copies be sent to the officers of the Alaska Municipal League. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk Ronald a s on, eyor 2 C.2. f� Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-38 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1982-83 WATER AND SEWER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGET: Froms Water -Contingency <$1,720> To: Water -Machinery do Equipment $1,720 This transfer provides monies to purchase a chlorinator in Well House #1. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. _ Ronald A. Malston, Mayor r- J ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk i Approved by Finance: I` i t WJ C-3 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SETTING A DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED WESBET CIRCLE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City has been petitioned to establish an assessment district for water, sewer, and gravel road improvements in Wesbet Circle in Wesbet Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the City must hold a public hearing to allow comment on the proposed assessment district beT4"-v+oeeediWjw1iW-the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that a public hearing be +field on May 18, 1983 at the regular Council meeting of the City of Kenai for the purpose of discussion of a proposed assessment district in Wesbet Circle in Wesbet Subdivision. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald A. Malston, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: e2 Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-40 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. From: Construction 2 0> To: Salaries $2,620 Workmen's Comp. Insurance 130 This transfer provides monies to hire an employee to renovate concession stands at little league and softball fields. This is in lieu of contracting the work to independent contractors. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day r . of April, 1983. Ronald A. Malston, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances �i i March 17, 1983 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESBET CIRCLE, WESBET SUBDIVISION Approx. Project Lot s . ft. Lot Value Cost/Lot 5 9,065 $ 11,800 $ 3,196 6 9,000 11,700 3,173 7 9,230 12,000 3,254 8 9,600 12,500 3,384 9 11,650 15,000 4,107 10 12,000 15,500 4,230 11 10,370 13,500 3,656 70® LMI.0.00 25 000 Owners: Wesley E. and Elizabeth E. Warren P. 0. Box 116 Kenai, Alaska 99611 25% Limit - Proposed Assessment $ 2,950 2,925 3,000 3,125 3,750 3,875 3,375 23 000 ia a 000580 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION N0. 83-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA PRO- VIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY OF KENAI AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON — , 1983, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE QUESTION OF AMENDIN - OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA BY DELETING A LIMITATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIES TO TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE FAIR CASH MARKET VALUE OF THE PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the City has experienced difficulty in equitably apportioning the costs of local improvements financed in part by the City because of the provision contained in Section 7-3 of the City Charter which limits the amount of the assessment on a parcel to twenty-five percent of the fair cash market value of the property after giving effect to the benefit accruing thereto from the work or action for which assessed, and WHEREAS, the above limitation places a burden upon the taxpayers of the City by forcing them to absorb the portion of any assess- ments that exceed the twenty-five percent limitation, and WHEREAS, this provision has resulted in the City's reluctance to form new assessment districts. WHEREAS, it would be most equitable to have benefited property pay the total cost of local improvements on a pro rate basis to the extent of benefits conferred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, as Follows: Section 1: That the Council hereby calls a special election which sh� awe held , 1 r�, for the sole purpose of the submission of the propos tion set out in Section 2 hereunder. Section 2: That the following proposition shall be sub- mitted to he qualified voters of the City of Kenai at the special election called herein above in substantially the same form as is set out hereinafter: 1 1, PROPOSITION The last sentence of Section 7-3 of the Charter of the City of Kenai reads as follows: "No special assessment shall be levied by the city government against any property in excess of twenty-five percent of the fair cash market value of the property after giving effect to the benefit accruing thereto from the work or action for which assessedvf Shall such sentence be deleted so as to allow for assessment of 100% of all costs of improvements to be levied against benefited properties? PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald A. Ralston, Mayor ATTEST: enet Whelan, City Clerk i (� Approved by Finances Coi c=6 Suggested by: Councilwoman Glick CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF A SHELTERED WORKSHOP AND LIVING QUARTERS FACILITY FOR THE HANDICAPPED IN THE CENTRAL PENINSULA AREA AND A REQULST FOR LEGISLATIVE FUNDING. WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough has approximately 1200 students enrolled in special services programs, 60 of which are in the high schools and the State of Alaska, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation has 190 disabled clients who could use this service, and WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has expended hundreds of thousands of dollars for the education of our handicapped through high school stage, and WHEREAS, there are no facilities located in the Kenai Peninsula Borough which can continue to provide for and meet the needs of the handicapped after they can no longer participate in the school system, and WHEREAS, the vast majority of our handicapped are capable of becoming employable, productive members of our society, riot a continued financial burden, and WHEREAS, by becoming an employed productive member of society their feelings of self-worth and esteem are greatly increased, and WHEREAS, existing facilities in the State have long waiting lists and since it is always in the best interest of the handicapped and their families to remain in the same general area for mutual support, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that their is a sufficient need for a sheltered workshop and living quarters facility here in the central peninsula area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that the City of Kenai supports the concept of a sheltered workshop and living quarters facility in the central 1 Peninsula area and the request for legislative funding and be it further resolved that upon the passage of this resolution the Clerk of the City of Kenai is requested to send copies thereof to Governor William !. Sheffield, Senators Donald Gilman and Paul Fischer and Representatives Hugh Malone, Milo Fritz, Bette Cato, Robert Smith, Commissioner of Health, Education and Social Services and Mark Lewis, Commissioner of Community and Regional ; Affairs. ! PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day i April, 1963. Ronald A. Malston, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk PROGRAM NARRATIVE•: 7 The primary focus of this project is to develop a Sheltered workshop and Residential Care Facility for the Handicapped Residents of Alaska. The proposed program would employ 60 people and provide residential care for 12 severely handicapped individuals. This effort will ulti- mately lead to unsubsidized employment, restore dignity and a self- supporting workshop. The impetus behind this project is a group of desperate parents* of the handicapped. They have attempted for years to develop an opportunity for their children to become productive and happy .nr•mlxcrs of our. erjm- munity. Several families have put their children on two-year waitinq lists...others have given up and refusre to have their children subjected to more frustration. This project is the answer to many of the needs of the handicapped residents of the Kenai Peninsula. In our research and assessment of the problem facing the handicapped, we found the following: 1. There is no sheltered workshop or residential care facility within 170 miles of Kenai. 2. The existing Residential Care Facilities (in Alaska) have two - three year waiting lists...handicapped people have been put in nursing homes because of the shortage of facilities. 3. Parents of Handicapped have moved from the Kenai Peninsula (and state) to find residential care. A. There are 1200 Kenai Peninsula Borough students enrolled in Special Services Programs; including 6"; presently r nrolled in high school. 5. There are 200 clients of the Division of Vocati,,nal Re- habilitation residing in the Kenai Peninsula. ti. There are no severely handicapped people employed ,n the entire 25,000 square miles of the Kenai P,!ninsula. *The children of these parente are 3rlu't:, rnnuiril; i•i fr ,rr 1P t fir,. I'VOGRAM NAIWAT1Vl: -snit : ' p.rtp, 2 7. Brunt- of tlrc• p:irc,nt:, of thy ::c•v,•rely handicapped are in their 50's - 70':; and arc oppt,,achinq the age where they will not care for their children. H. The unomploym' tit r,rty in the Yenai area is 21.2%... much higher for the handicapped. 9. There iFi no po:t- ecoridary training opportunities for the severely handicapped, on the Kenai. Peninsula. 10. Clients fortunate enough to be placed in residential care are miles from from their families. 11. Limited recreational and social facilities. The objective of this project is to provide a Residential Care Facility (RCF) for 12 severely handicapped people, create a Sheltered Workshop for 52 low and high functioning handicapped people and ultimately develop unsubsidized jobs and self-supporting workshop for our clients. The participants of the RCF and Sheltered Workshop will be referred by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Central Peninsula Mental Health Clinic, the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District, Parents Groups and other agencies and community organizations. The final selec- tion of the participants will be by People Count, Inc. Advisory Board consisting of representatives from the previously mentioned groups. The program director and staff will be employees of People Count, Inc. (PCI) and will he hired on recommendation of the Advisory Board. The program director will be directly responsible to the Executive Director and Operations Hanager pf PCI. The remainder of the staff will be directly supervised by the program director. A comprehensive network of volunteers and supporting agencies will be developed by PCI and the project staff. The RCF and the Sheltered Workshop will meet the needs of the handi- capped and will also provide many benefits to the Kenai Peninsula (and 'safts pig • i• PROJECT NARRATIVE cont: page 3 � 1 Alaska). Some of the benefits include: 1. Employment for 60 residents of [.he Kenai Peninsula. 3 2. Much needed residential care for 12 severely handicapped individuals. i 3. pnsubsidized jobs for the handicapped. 4. A permanent, self-supporting workshop. t 5. A cost effective program. 6. Restored dignity to clients and family. 7. Community awarness of the problems and needs of the handicapped. @. Relevant survival and vocational training and counseling. 9. Opportunities for clients to obtain independent living skills. 10. Clients could be placed near their hones ... thus receiving much needed support. 4 Perhaps the greatest benefit of the project is a restored hope for these clients parents, of a productive and happy future for their children • who have suffered for so many years. The underlying philosophy of this project is L-or per, the staff and volunteers to become a surrogate family to our clients. The clients k need of residential care, employment, vocational training, counseling, learning survival (independent living skills) and a 'sense of belonging (and love) will be met by this program. i 1 i I I 1 I `t I i 1 f� r Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS, RENTAL RATES AND CLEANING DEPOSIT AMOUNTS FOR THE MAIN ROOM AND KITCHEN OF FORT KENAY. WHEREAS, the Senior Citizens have vacated Fort Keney by moving into their new facility and thereby creating a greater opportunity for use of the Old Fort for public purposes, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council of the City of Kenai to permit greater public use of that facility and necessitating a new set of rules and regulations governing the use thereof, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to make the Fort as self-sufficient as possible, and WHEREAS, the Senior Citizens' director will be responsible for administering the use of Fort Kenay. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA as follows: Section 1: Resolution Nos. 78-114 and 81-80 are hereby rescinds- in their entirety. Section 2: Rental areass (a) The main room (ground floor) is available for use by the general public. (b) The kitchen may be rented, provided the main room is also rented. Section 3s Rental rates. Fort Kenay shall be rented on a reservation basis only. (a) Main Room Rent (meetings 1/2 day) 5.00 (meetings full day) 10.00 Cleaning fee 20.00 Damage A key deposit 50.00 1 j W Main Room Rent (parties) 25.00 Cleaning fee 45.00 Damage do key deposit 100.00 W Kitchen Rent 10.00 Cleaning fee 35.00 Damage do key deposit 100.00 Section 4: Under no cir umstances shall there be served on We poses of Fort Ken any a oholic beverage3, and damage and key deposits m at be aid in advance of renting the facilities at Fort Ke y. eposits minus the rental fee G 40 will be returned to the re a by mail following return of the issued key provided the ort is left in an orderly state and provided that no provis n of this resolution has been violated as may be determ a by the Senior Citizens director. No refund of dep it will be made until so authorized by the Senior Citiz ns director. In the event that the Senior Citize direct r determines the Fort has not been left in satisfac ory manner, the deposit will be forfeited by the nter in th amount necessary for the City to have the Fo repaired. Section 5: Exceptions to provisions of this resolution. oopart�y shall be exempt from any provision of this resolution except by formal application for such exemption —� to the - v�nc�n tar (a) Permitted use. Use of any area of the Fort other than the main room and kitchen to which the renter is issued a key is strictly prohibited. Anyone violating any provision of this resolution shall be barred from future use of the Fort and their deposit will be forfeited. - PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald A. Holston, Flayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk FA -- -- - --- -- i I n 1 1 MEMO TO: Kenai City Council t FROM: Charles A. Brown j SUBJECT: Resolution # 83-43 (C-7 in 4-6-83 packet) .. I DATE: April 5, 1983 1 i Please amend Section 4 of the Resolution by making the first two sentences read as follows: Section 4: Under no circumstances shall there be served on the premises of Fort Kenay any alcoholic beverages, and all rents, fees, and deposits must be paid in advance of renting the facilities at Fort Kenay. Deposits will be n h returned to the renter by mail following return of the issued key provided the Fort is left in an orderly state and provided that no provision of this resolution has been ` violated as may be determined by the Senior Citizens director.. t a j■ J r Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-44 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1982-83 AIRPORT LAND SYSTEM BUDGET: From: M & 0 - FBO Fencing <$11 To: M & 0 - Improvements Other than Buildings $ 4,130 M & 0 - Repair & Maintenance 7,204 51139 This transfer provides sufficient monies for the City to award a contract to Alaska Fence Company for rehabilitation and in- stallation of fencing on the Airport. The monies provided above are in addition to ADAP grant monies previously budgeted. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald a s on, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: Le� Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA AWARDING THE BID FOR 4,440 C.Y. OF GRAVEL TO BETTER CONCRETE PRODUCTS AT $4.50/C.Y. FOR A TOTAL BID OF $19,980. WHEREAS, the Public Works Department solicited bids for 4,000 c.y. of gravel for repairs and maintenance of City streets, and WHEREAS, the following bids were received, Unit 49000 C.Y. Bidder Price Fill Better Concrete Products $4.50 180000 Jackson Construction 4.90 19,600 Norris do Sons, Contractors 6.34 25,360 Central Alaska Construction 6.20 24,800 R. L. Borgen & Sons 6.95 279800 and WHEREAS, Better Concrete Products' bid is the lowest responsible bid, and WHEREAS, there is $20,000 budgeted from Federal Revenue Sharing for gravel and the City is badly in need of gravel, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai and Better Concrete Products mutually agree to increase the quantity to 4,440 c.y. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that Better Concrete Products be awarded the contract to furnish and deliver 4,440 c.y. of gravel at $4.50/c.y. to the City Shop area for a Total Bid Price of $19,980. 1 PASSED 9Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald a s on, mayor ATTESTs i -Janet Whelan, City Clerk i Approved by Finances N I i - 2 C -/o Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SECURITY FENCING - 1983 TO ALASKA FENCE COMPANY, INC. FOR THE AMOUNT OF $157,497.70. • J WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received the following bids: Sch. A Sch. 8 Sch. C AA 01 AA #2 Alaska Fence Co., Inc. $54,128.80 $26,165.40 $529924.50 $17,012.00 $7,267.00 Peninsula Fence Co. 58,303.60 22,412.80 53,637.50 17,300.00 79353.00 WHEREAS, Schedule A is to construct new fencing around the FBO area south of the terminal; Schedule B is to construct new fencing, relocate and reconstruct fencing around the FBO area north of the terminal; and Schedule C, AA 01 and AA 02 is to restore existing fence from the tower area to the extreme north. WHEREAS, the Public Works Department and Airport Manager recommends awarding all schedules and additive alternates. WHEREAS, this resolution is contingent upon Federal Aviation Administration approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that a contract be awarded for construction of Kenai Municipal Airport Security Fencing - 1983 to Alas Fence Company, Inc. in the amount of $157,497.70.P-90 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald A. Malston, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances ral Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA1, ALASKA REQUESTING THE THIRTEENTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TO DEFEAT SB 115 AND HB 200 ENTITLED "AN ACT RELATING TO INDIVIDUAL 1 RIGHTS OF PEACE OFFICER" WHICH IS DESIGNED TO SET UP SEPARATE PERSONNEL REGULATIONS AS OPPOSED TO ALL OTHER GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES. WHEREAS, all governmental employees, including peace officers work under a personnel code designed and adopted by the governing agency for which these employees work, and WHEREAS, SB 115 and HB 200 carry with them the implication peace officers are entitled to separate rights than other fellow governmental employees and even superior rights over the constituency for whom he is employed, and WHEREAS, peace officers under the law already have the some rights as any other individual in the State of Alaska, with the specific exception as provided for in AS 23.10.037 (b), and WHEREAS, the City Council of Kenai believes that peace officers i should be treated no differently than any other governmental j employee who has responsibility to perform honestly, competently i and adequately for their employer, i.e., the citizens of each governing agency of a particular entity, and WHEREAS, SB 115 and HB 200 provide rights that are superior to any other governmental worker or workers in private industry for which there has been no legal justification other than providing for equality of treatment with other government and private industry employees under AS 23.10.37. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that said Council go on record urging the Thirteenth Legislature of the State of Alaska to defeat SB '15 and HS 200 on the basis that it will create a special type of relationship between employee and employer for a single group of employees that will not result in any benefits to the health or welfare of the cities of the State of Alaska, and further resolve 1 that upon defeat of these bills that the issue of separate a. ttelLme.n-t- -of--employed peace officers under AS 23.10.037 (b) be f 1 _re-examined for necessity versus fairness and equality to this -employ-ee-grOupo--and further that immediately after the adoption of this resolution, the Clerk of the City of Kenai shall mail copies thereof to Governor William J. Sheffield, Senators Rodey, Kelly, Ray, Sturgulewski and Kerttula and Senate State Affairs Committee members Senators Vic Fischer, Bill Ray and Tim Kelly, Senate Judiciary Committee members Senators Bill Ray, Joe r Josephson, Richard Eliaeon, Fritz Pettyjohn and Robert Ziegler. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald A. Malston, Mayor ATTEST: Janet a a.^., i y er (7) 2 i F Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, ACCEPTING A DEED OF RELEASE FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN- ISTRATION FOR A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 33, T6N, R11W, S.M. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has requested the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to release an area hereinafter described from all'conditions, reservations, and restrictions contained in said Quitclaim Deed to permit the sale or long-term lease for non -airport purposes of said land, and WHEREAS, in accordance with Kenai Municipal Code 7.30.030, the City has obligated itself to devote the proceeds from the sale or long-term lease for non -airport purposes of said property exclusively for the development, improvement, operation, or maintenance of the Kenai Municipal Airport, and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has determined that said land no longer serves the purpose for which it was transferred, and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has determined that such property can be used, leased, sold, salvaged, or disposed of by the City of Kenai for other than airport purposes without materially and adversely affecting the development, improvement, operation, or maintenance of the Kenai Municipal Airport. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA as follows: Section 1: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Dead of Release accepting from the Federal Aviation Admin- istration all that portion of the S 1/2 S 1/2 SW 1/4 lying south of the Kenai Spur Highway, within Section 33, T6N, R11W, S.M. Section 2: The City of Kenai will devote the proceeds from the sale or long-term lease for the development, improvement, operation, or maintenance of the Kenai Municipal Airport in accordance with Kenai Municipal Code 7.30.030. 1 .I PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day ^, of April, 1983. ! Ronald alston, ayor ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk 2 i i TR. B [ _ I Suggested by: Administration CITY Of KENAI , RESOLUTION NO. 83-49 I BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT j THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE GENERAL FUND i BUDGET: From: Other - Contingency 0800 Tos _ City Manager - Miscellaneous $800 This transfer provides monies for membership dues and other miscellaneous expenses. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. ona A. a s on, Mayor ATTESTS i Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances G' Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-50 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE AIRPORT TERMINAL RENOVATION CAPITAL PROJECT FUND: From: Contingency <$45,252) To: Construction $45,252 This transfer provides monies for metal siding on the existing Airport Terminal Building. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 6th day of April, 1983. Ronald a s on, Mayor ATTESTS Janet Whelan, My Clerg Approved by Finance: __.IeL 1 i i i 1 r CHANGE Di,lnhulion lu: ` '_`��? '- ORDER OWNER C+ 7 ARC.IIITrCT AIA DOCUNIENT Ci01 CONTRACTOR C1* —49 (�= p . � " FIELD. OTIIER PROJECT: Kenai Municipal Airport Terminal (name,address) Expansion & Renovation TO (Contractor): Kenai, Alaska r H. Halvorson, Inc. P.O. Box 11308 Spokane, WA 99211 �S'j . v C R NUMBER: 3 INITIATION DATE: April 7th, 1983 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT FOR: Construction L J CONTRACT DATE: August 5th, 1982 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Install 18 ga metal siding over the existing building, including the second story and chimney. Material -to be the same as supplied under the existing Contract. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 3 COST........................................$57,097.00 Nat valid until ,ignml by laNh the Omwe anti Ardotrct. Signature of the Contractor indicate, his agreomnnl fit -re -with, including any adju%lownt in the Camract Sum or Contracl Timo. The original (Contract Sum) was ........................... $ 1,597,600.00 , Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ 33,65488 , The (Contract Sumi N'xna+.tnteeci•lrMxirnun►Ee►se►prior to this Change Order was .......... $ 1,631,254:88 The (Contract Sumr will be (increased) (deeren+caH (wm+mngmII by this Change Order......................................................... $ 57,097.00- The, new (Contract Sum►including this Change Order will be ... $ 1,688,35188 1, . The Contract Time will he fillereased) kleefe"ouldt (unchanged) by Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the (late of this Change Order therefore is unchanged. Authorized: Carmen V. Gintoli H. Halvorson, Inc. _City of Kenai All %V 4625 `" 8`sV Tf T08 'Y8x 580 AtidmRenai , AK 99611 �`I`Spokane, WA 99211 A`Id`E: nai , AK 99611 KY V� tIY ,� / y V.-B Y DATE 0 VE r-� ` DATE__ AIA DOCVME T C.761 • CHAUA ORE)ER • APkIE 197H WIW ' • At•%" • •. 14714 THE AMERIC %% IMPFIMTE Of AkCHITECTS, 173E .%ItN FORA %%E . % A.. 1% \,111%1.10% n C .10100, G701 — 1978 CHANGE l)istriltlllltln �--�� ORDER OWNER CI AIIfECI' aJn DocuMrrvr r,701 CONTRACTOR C FIELD OTIIEK vi 41.1 PROJECT: Kenai Municipal Airport Terminal CH r, 9 UMBER: 3 (name, address) Expansion & Renovation Kenai, Alaska INITIATION DATE: April 7th, 1983 TO (Contractor): 1 --1 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: i H. Halvorson, Inc. CONTRACT FOR- construction P.O. Box 11308 Spokane, WA 99211 L J CONTRACT DATE: August 5th, 1982 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Prepare existing stucco walls to receive: i coat stain killer 2 coats of Fuller O'Brien acrylic paint Patch large holes and cracks CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 3 COST......................................$7,491.00 1 ►i Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architet I. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agmement herewith, Including any adlusbnem in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (Fi m"ieed-MMeirrKlnrer t) was ........................... $ 1,597,600.00 - , - Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ 33,65488 1 The (Contract Sum) 0mranteed-MaxirmnrrEe prior to this Change Order was .......... $ 1,631,254:88 The (Contract Sum) 10trarameed- Mmimtltn%1st1 will be (increased) (TI1ee MSW) 1011031T ed) • by this Change Order......................................................... $ 7,491 00 The new (Contract Sumi including this Change Order will be ... $ 1,638,745.881( The Contract Time will he awdemed) (dimwawdi (unchanged) by ( ---)Days, -- The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is unchanged. Authorized: Carmen V. Gintoli H. Halvorson, Inc. City of Kenai ;. owN AKCH ECm, n(: r 308 �oxT 4625�xlox 580 Address Address Address l Itan 11 -AK 996 Spokane, W 9921 Kenai, AK 99611 ... �, BY Ry &d NY DATE 3 3 16 DATE DATE I AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRit 19;8 EDITION • AIN4 • ri 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITFCTS, 173S NEW YORK AVE., v W . %VA%H1%(;to%, U C 2(016 G701-1978 carmen vincent gintoli, architect box 44625 professional building suite 110 kenai, alaska 99611 907 283.7732 March 31, 1983 City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, AK 99611 Attention: Keith Kornelis, Director Department of Public Works Re: Change Order #3 Airport Terminal Renovation & Expansion Project Dear Keith; Attached please find two separate editions of Change Order #3. Since Council requested a cost for either painting the existing structure or siding it with the same type material as the addition is to receive, we prepared two Change Orders. Council can choose either. We have reviewed both Proposals in depth. And we have verified the quantities and costs submitted. Both are reasonable. Should you require further information, please call. Sincerely, do& carm n vincent gintoli, architect COp� �vN�f •, 6q �qti.le V, �, �� • COI.f'��fawc Carmen V. Gintol i CVG: sdt i�% enclosures _ eats i PIIHLIC HEARING„ PROP05ED JAIL FACILITY, STATE OF ALASKA MARCH 3, 1903, 100 PM KENAI CITY ADMINISTRATION RUILDING CITY MANAGER HILLIAM BRIGHTON PRESIDING ~ 1. City Mnnagor Brighton reviewed the ground rules rand guidelines. He then introduced Roqor Endell, Director of the Division of Corrections. It. STATE DIV. OF CORRECTIONS Mr. Endell introduced Kevin Bruce, Special Anot. to the Governor, Corrections. He explained this was his 60th day on the job, he was at UA in Juneau, Anchorage 6 Engle River Corrections. The correction area is a problem every- where. Alaska does not have masuive correction centers, all are small In Alaska. The State intends to keep them that way. He hoe been meeting with people all over Southcontral Alaska regarding this subject. the facilities are over- crowded. The public has demanded the State be tougher on crime. This has been done, now we need more facilities. The Legislature does not want to spend more money there. He is tryinq to travel all around the State to find the beat place. They will coat 64 to E5 Million each, we will have to build one every year from now on, of 60 bed ... _..,... ... �,-...�.i?r� �•:: facilities. We do not have to do things as they do out - aide. A took force woo formed loot December, they made 35 recommendations to the Governor. The Yildwood site was one potential site that could be remodeled for this •,,,ry-e,,,�6 purpose. There is a program report of the facility. It would be a medium security institution, a double security fence topped by some type of wire, observers on the roof, possibly guard dogs. It would put the Kenai jell out of business, you will have more police on the road. It simplifies dealings with the Court. Medium security prisoners are between 1 6 5 years. There are half -way houses in Fairbanks and Anchorage. 29 felons in jail are from the Kenai area, 150 from the Peninsula. There is always an objection to a jail facility. They have to be someplace. There are facilities all over the State. It has to be close to services. They have found neigh- borhoods build up around the facilities. There are 1-1/2 million people in jail right now, there are very few instances of escape. Those stick in our minds. There are 1500 Alaskans in jail right now. Most things people fear do not happen, but it does happen occasionally. The prisoners do some work in the facility in Palmer, they ' worked on heavy duty equipment. There are some positive sides. It will cost about 63 Million to get ready. He estimated about 71 people on staff. it will hold 200-220 inmates. Average salary will be $40,000 It would have 5 nurses, they would use the school system and other '�'�""""'�"a"'d'%'"�'•'""�-^�•n facilities. 1/2 of the employees would be experienced em- ployees. we would need contractors to start the work, the inmates would complete the work. The employees have to live in the area. They will need medical, dental, food services. The inmate pypulation should go to work. They do not deserve special services. We should teach them good work habits. We need to work with the commun- ity to ensure it will work. Correction operations are complex, training in difficult, incidents are minor and , few. There are advantages - it a stable industry, is a good business industry. Ha has heard that the site ael- action is cut and dried. That to not true. if there is strong oppnsition, we will leave. There are many sites available. -arire�erfs,e II Gl33 I � I Public Heerirq - Propnsad .fail Facility March 3, 1903 Page 2 III. PUBLIC TESTIMONY 1. Waldo Coy" He hen lived in Kenai for 35 years. He as Itvs in communities with prison work camps. No- body objected. He aeon no objection to the Wildwood facility. It may help Kenai Native Aeon, and will be an asset to the community. 2. Carol frean She lives in N. Kenai, is Executive 3—ec—y-.-T-o'-RVA and has knowledge of management of property. She would like more troopers available in remote areas. We have problems in the area now. We should give the authorities a chance to correct the problems in correctional facilities. She has material in support of the facility. 3. Mal Cole He has lived here 40 years. He wee gre`eEed-by 400 fine people (Natives) when he arrived. It will be a benefit and asset to the Natives and the people. A treaty in the 18001s returned this lend to the Natives. 4. Gene Collins He is President of the Kenai Chamber 0 o—iZ�'mmerce. He had a resolution supporting the facility. i. John Nine He to neither pro or con. The public needs to now the proposal. It should be available. There should be social contact between the State and the community. He cannot support the project without a contract. 6. Tom Wagoner He to a 14 yr. resident. Wildwood close down one year after he moved here. There was panic in Konal. Nobody wanted it till George Hiller went to Gov. Egan and asked for it. They have been an economic force in the community and have not been given much credit. KNA will benefit, but so will the surrounding community. The money is turned over 7 to 11 times. Council reviewed a new jell facility for 40 beds at the loot meeting, so there is a problem. He has lived in 2 jail towns, in most towns there is not a high level of awareness. He is in support of the facility. 7. Dave Carey He Is a 23 year resident of Kenai. e o�sed to the facility. The Borough Assembly repealed their ordinance of support. The only justification to money. The State is trying to buy off the community. It should not be a business like Safeway. With unemployment at 20% +, we should stress local hire. Also, why is there little mention of cost? How much will pay for the escapees harming? Who will pay for lower land values? Why not put it in an isolated area? Now many people have escaped from McLaughlin? How many maximum security people will be temporarily placed in this facility? 8. _Bob _r en �He lives north of the City limits near W,,AH . He is opposed to the facility. We will never own the land. will rent it. We will spend millions to fix it. Why not buy the lend to use? He liven near Wildwood and in not concerned about that. Mr. fndell hen done a good job of telling what we want to hear. 50 2 .. P"1 r i u n - m. Public Hearinq - Proposed Jail Facility March 5, 1983 Page 3 9. Bob Roth He lives in Kenai. He has 250 names on a petition objecting to the facility. He heard on the radio that the State people had made up their minds to have it at Mildwood. 10. Ro at "asks He has lived in Kenai since 1952. He can oympalWize with Mr. Bergen regarding the closeness. He didn't think there is as much concern, but there in cause for worry. Mildwood is the cheapest area in the State for a prison. He worked on the building, it is solid reinforced concrete and steel. You can't go on dollars and cents only. He hoe heard about the crowded,jollo in Alaska, drunken drivers and let offenders have been taken to Anchorage. We have to do something, $20 Million is conservative, it could be $50 Million. It would be $10 Million to do Mildwood. It would help the economy, we have very high unemploy- mental. An isolated area would mean starting at square one. We would need water A sewer, fire, etc. We are unnecessarily alarmed about escapees. He hoe a petition of 21 in favor. 11. At Willie Representing the Kenai Peninsula Fire Me—Kesociatlon. He hoe a resolution in favor. 12. Charlotte Korpinen She is in favor of the facility. 13. Keith Laurie He hoe a statement against the TOW riiey. — 14. Jack Hatcher He has heard a rosy picture. We have a pro em w th crime In America. The number of years would be one criteria for minimum security. We have a corrupt situation. He didn't see why we had to bring this into one of the finest arose in Alaska. 15.Don Erwin He read a statement opposing the facility. e e ed, he hoe lived near various facilities, he didn't want to do it again. He will fight to keep it out. 16. Bernie Doyle He lives 2 miles from Mildwood. He is oppose o he facility. we should not have anything lose then a mL.-Imum security in Kenai if we are going to build. A 40 bed facility in Kenai has nothing to do with this. He asked about the Reach case, he escaped from a facility and killed 4 people. 17. John Carter He is against the facility. 10. Gary Davis He hoe been employed by Mildwood, he vas n ommson. He has no fears of the facility in Mildwood. 19. Jim Arnees Jr. He has been an accountant in the area or years, hoe spent his life in Kenai, 40 People will mean new schools, police, facilities. It would not help us. This is a political thing. Mr. fndetl may be qone in the next administration. The facility could he changed to a maximum security. Re- gardinq Mr. Mooch, he was not being jailed, but under supervision of the State. If anything happened to his 2 girls, someone would he responsible. :Ott:`�:i:..•y'r'''..�...^'-fr�r�••e �' ?:.'>tK'; Public Hearing - Proposed Jail Facility March 3, 1983 Page 4 20. Cue Rodeo There has been no information except oar or and against. Thin is a perfect example of bureaucratic pettifogging, it would put small criminals with hardened criminals. Many escapees have done much damage. Most of our criminals are out of State. Mr. Endell has not presented enough facto. 21. Tom Gregrory He is a resident of Kenai. It would be w se o see an operating plan and have another meet- ing. He feels uncomfortable with a prison because he to a parent. He questioned the impact on rents in Kenai. About 1/2 of the employees would go to rentals, rents would go up. He agrees with John Wise. 22. Harold Dale He has been here since 1940. He has many kids a d grand kids. He went out to Wildwood and saw the security proposals. He agrees with Tom Gregory. Most people who have lived near jails have no problems. Maybe we should not push against but for a properly managed one. 23. Connie Keeuil She is in favor of the facility. We can ask for stricter enforcement and not a jail, that to hypocritical. 24. Wilma Hempson She is against the facility. She had -12Ua gna urea in a short time. She asked Mr. Endell to look further into the feelings of the people. 25. Rick Ross Police Chief Cit of Kenai He grew up n ens one as c ange e o rime is here now. He will not speak just about Wildwood. This is the 3rd largest population in the State, and the largest judicial area. Many areas are handling Kenai people. We would only be able to handle about 15 Day inmates _because of being crowded. This court serves the area across the Inlet as well as here. The medium facility would be 150 people from the Kenai area. Eventually we are going to have a prison, we are fortunate that we can pick our place. This type of hearing has never been done to his knowledge. 26. RubyCo lee She is a resident of Kenai, she came here in TWU—. Let us take care of our own crime and not send them someplace else. You cannot put the facility in an isolated area, you need services. If you build a new facility, it will raise taxes. If we have criminals in our area, It is our responsibility to take care of them. We are all for libraries, educa- tional facilities, etc., but not for the ones wbo go wrong. Maybe we can do something for those. She worked at Wildwood for 14 years, they have carpenter shop, plumbing shop to train people. It housed 220 military people, it cannot be too bad. The mesa hall, cooking facilities are all right there. When we turned Wildwood over to KNA, the citizens wondered how we were going to get along losing 400 people. We don't own Wildwood, the Native people do. They can do as they went to with it. 27. Ken Cuoak Attorne He lived in Soldotno 7 years, an grew up to .nc orage. He is to favor of the facility. Regarding the statement that the State is. holding money out to entice the building of the prison, r i t tt I I � �..•..sr�rwrpoi��r,;rs�rxsmi..no!!rA Public Hearinq - Proposed Jail Facility March 3, 1983 Page 5 we object to monies spent badly, here is a chance to spend it right. The prisoners have to be transferred from Anchorage for Court at great cost. There to a risk in jail facility, but oil companies are too. We should be willing to take the chance. 28. Kenn Ste hens He has been in Alaska since 1963, in ens a nce 967, is on the Borough Assembly. Some people feel the Kenai Natives are trying to bail themselves out and make money. The State has held out the carrot of money before contacting the people. It was railroaded through. Let the State post bond that anyone who to hurt will be paid. He is against the facility. 29. Brenda Ste hens She lives in Soldotne. She is age ne he acility, it will affect the whole community. She objected to businesses being con- tacted first. It was a "PR" campaign. Unemploy- ment is over 20%, she would like them to look at local hire. 30. John �Dou lamas He to on the Borough Assembly, the area e�esents includes Kenai. Some of hie friends are for, some against. Equating a prison in a community ouch as ours is like comparing a meat house to a slaughter house. The Kenai Peninsula has always been a place that looked positively at development. Most of the people he has talked to have been against the facility, one was for. The City jail to not a place to reside prisoners for a long time. They are on their way someplace else. That gives him a feeling of satisfaction. Also, we have a Senior Citizen home in Wildwood. He didn't think when they build the home there, they thought they would be near a prison. Old people have an insecure feeling anyhow, that would give them more. We have no assurance after Mr. Endell's term is over if we would have a maximum security prison. fie might have pressure himself. A facility like that would demand other facilities. It to out of the City. It would present a tax burden on fire services. We need to get crime off the streets and need tougher court systems. But an ex -judge who got tough woo criticized. He thought it was more a criticism against the system than the judge. 31. William PUl�li a He is a resident of Kenai. He is no n avoe ova medium security facility, but is in favor of a maximum security. The new Federal peni- tentiary has had only one escape in many years. The economy rests on oil and fishing in the area. Oil production in the area is decreasing. This to a recession -proof business. Instead of moving 70 families in, why not set up a training program for locals to be employed? Iv. STATE RESPONSE Mr. Endell said he would reply to statements made first. Historically, Corrections facilities showed up at the door- step without notification to the residents. He decided not to do it that way. He has subjected himself to a lot of abuse. 60 days ago he was not a bureaucrat, now he is. There have been citizens advisory boards, he will have that Public Hearing - Proposed Jail Facility March 3, 1963 Page 6 N „• if the facility is built. This gives the people something to Day about it. He has the power to appoint such a board. Regarding the hiring list, they will probably need 50% ' experienced correctional officers, in upper level manage- ment. The rest will be local. Regarding distribution of the proposed program. He gave one to Councilman Wise, he would like the media to have copies. Regarding the statement that this is a pay-off, that the State came in f promising money. He did not invite himself to any meetings, he has been asked. Why is it near a community? We have to have services, the law requires it. Regarding the statement that the State has made up its mind. There is nothing written to that effect. No radio announcements have been authorized by him. Regarding Mr. Meech. He wee a mental Patient, not under - -- -- - incarceration. Nobody wants that kind of activity. It is unfair to suggest we would went it. am Regarding dangling a carrot. He hoe tried to point out the Positive and negative aspects. He feels the positive out- weighs the negative. ' Regarding a lack of publicity. He has been coming for 30 days. He has met with many people of the community and the media. He hoe tried to make himself avallobIa. Regarding high rents. That is important. It is bad to send people into an area where they will be gouged. He hoe asked the City Manager to prepare for this. He Is not willing to put in a facility without protection of the employees 8190, that two _ goes ways. Regarding positive and negative economic activity. Fishing and oil are positive, crime is negative. Crime is on the Peninsula now. Further development means further crime. If unemployment goes up, crimes go up. V. QUESTIONS 1. Men. On page 3 of the recommendations of the Task Force, the recommended Mat . - -Su Borough and Kenai Peninsula Borough for maximum security. it would -" seem the recommendations go against what he said. Mr. Endell replied, that is a different issue. The State has no facility for maximum security. it will cost $45 Million, it will employ 150. have 300-400 inmates. It will be new construction. He added, In the States the new Federal Penitentiary had 3 Inmates that almost got out. One was an Alaskan. They are looking at several communities that are looking at this. Han. There could be 2 facilitiee in the area? Mr. Endell replied yes. i .....-�:•: sue•.- �.�.'.'L: �:;:ji:;�':.».'�.-'.�.� � vetiMY.$d6w Public Heertnq - Proposed Jail Facility March 3, 1983 Page 7 2. Lady. She wanted to state that KNA sent the proposal to Mr. Endell, he did not come to KNA. Mr. Endell added, there are people begging for a facility now. Years ago no one wanted them, now we have requests from all over Alaska. 3. Lady. Is there a possibility of 2 facilities so you could move from one to the other? Mr. Endell replied, no. That is not a good arrangement. Usually they move to another area. Lady. Would you have conjugal visits? Mr Endell replied., the State does not address this. If an inmate is near the point of release, he has a furlough. It is possible, but not now. Lady. Will there be males or females? Mr. Endell said the melee for sentencing, the females prior to sentencing. The State has 30 women serving time in Alaska. They cannot house women near their communities. They must be housed in one area to serve their needs. One is in Anchorage. 4. Men. Will there be work release programs? Vr. Endell replied, in the Task force report, they suggested community entry program for each inmate before going beck to the street, within 3 months of release. He noted we must decide if we went them better or bitter. It may be possible at a later date, but none at this time. Man. That makes security out of the question. Mr. Endell replied, these are people who are going out anyway. it is for those that are getting ready to leave. Man. Regarding plea bargaining. We may have hardened criminals on the streets if they use that. Mr. Endell replied, there is no plea bargaining in Alaska. That Is a result of the Chiefs of Police request. 5. Man. He questions the feasibility of the site in 2 or 3 years. He lives 75' from Building 10. Will this still be viable in later years? Why not use this facility for a temporary and build a better facility? How long will thin he satisfactory? Mr. Endell replied, Corrections cannot spend much money on less than a long-term facility. But it is wiee to look at adjacent ground. Man. He is lookinq at the welfare of KNA. Down the road, when this will be confronted, who wants a used Jail? Mr. Endell replied, we have $7 Million to build a 50 bed facility in Bethel, $5-1/2 Million in Nome, $45 Million for a maximum security. We need to re- place 2 jails in Anchorage. We will need $118 Million to bring the system to Consitutional standards. It is expensive. 6. Lady. What is the decision -making process? Mr. Endell replied, he will have a great deal to nay. His rer.o- mendations will be important. I I' t� I I Public Hearing - Proposed Jail facility March 3, 1983 Page 8 Lady. Who would the recommendations go to? Mr. Endell ; replied, he has had a technical evaluation on the coats to build. He has had staff to look at safety. He hoe looked at real estate value. He hoe looked at ` the bottom line and estimated staff. It goes to the Governor and to the Legislature. Unfortunately, it " can become a political football. Lady. Will it go to the Legislature? Mr. Endell replied, this case is a little different. We have some money. It will allow us to do some renovations and start the lease. ?. Man. Regardinq the location in the community. Chiniek is regarded ae a potential site, but it to not near a Community. Mr. Endell replied Chintak is 49 miles from Kodiak. That to a different type of service area. It serves Kodiak, the Aleutians and BrLstol Bey. Bristol Bay has a crisis situation in their jails. Lady. Why didn't he leave material at the City Clerk's office for those who could not attend the meeting? Mr. Endell replied, it was made clear to people that asked that It wee being prepared. It was finished yesterday. (March 2, 1983) Lady. She hoe great respect for this public hearing. The lest one she went to 15 years ego, the moderator !^1 sold it was just for form. She was interested in the material. Why wee the hearing done before the report was done? Mr. Endell explained, this report is not for the public hearing. It is done for architects, eng- ineere, etc. It is a technical document. 1 Lady. Were there any public Information documents available? Mr. Endell replied, no. Lady. Are there any other ways we can speak on this 1 other than the Legislature? Mr. Endell replied, he has had similar problems in his residency. There is a i� point where you don't go to police and courts and tell them what to do. Operating correctional facilities to 4 a highly technical job. We have an obligation to the ► public to do this. There hoe been much publicity on this. ' 9. Man. What is the escape rate on medium security? Mr. �x`tilPe Endell replied, they do not keep statistics on this. It to infinitesimal with the rate of those incarcer- ated. i Man. What Is medium security? Mr. Endell reviewed the definition used at the beginning of his report. Man. It is like an Army stockade, they escape from those. Mr. Endell replied, that to not true. Man. They will be mainly felons. Medium security is �I lees than 10 years? Mr. Endell replied, most are one to i years, 10 is maximum security. f t I Men. These will not be violent people or those with past histories? Mr. Endell replied he had never heard I 1 that. I� i I i i � 1 i� - �-�e,x*�.rrasr�.w..!.�oa•:,c+!'rt�rys+ta 1 I 1 i Public Henrinq - Proposed Jail Facility March 3, 1983 Page 9 Man. Will they be run-of-the-mill violent prisoners? Mr. Endell replied, 1 to 5 years of primarily property related and not violent offences against persona. Man. Will someone with 15 years and 10 years suo- pended be eligible? Mr. Endell replied, yes, but other factors are considered - his past record, the person, etc. Man. We would have the name chance as Eagle River. Mr. Endell replied, you would be fortunate to get, they are medium security. If It was maximum security and not medium security, it would be his head. Man. The prison guards are worse then the prisoners. Mr. Endell replied, the State has high standards and the guards are not like that. Man. The prisoners could escape. Mr. Endell said, with security, it not likely. Man. Now did the man in Anchorage get loose? Mr. Endell replied, the most hazardoue are those in your local jail. Anchorage and Eagle River now have double fencing. 30. Man. He suggested putting the information in the library. Mr. Endell replied he will give it to the media. Man. He thought Mr. Endell had done a good job in presenting this. 11. Ruby Coyle. Regarding taxes, Wildwood facility is a taxable entity. They pay taxes to the Borough. 12. Man. Regarding the lease, is it 20 to 30 year? Mr. Endell replied, he would prefer a long term lease with option. To protect as so our interests are not destroyed. 13. Man. What is the statistical figure on security? Mr. Endell replied, it is hard to get out of double fences. The beat fences are people. Fences are to slow them down. There to visibility around the compound, it is lighted at night. 14. Roland Lynn. Is It a reqular fence or buried? Mr. Endell replied, the statement that it is un-climbable is not true, but with 2 fences, it cuts down. With 45" arms going out, 4 ft. with wire or razor ribbon. 15. Lady. If this Is medium, will they go to minimum aacurity lot or be released to this area? Mr. Endell replied no, they would go to a minimum security facility and half way house. Lady. So they would not be put out here? Mr. Endell replied, not at this time. They could in the future, but it is not likely. i Public Hearing - Proposed Jail Far•ility March 3, 1993 Page 10 16. Men. Would families of the inmates go to the wvss'. community? Mr. Endell explained, they describe them as "camp followers." They do not have them in Alaska. Relatives will visit or come for a vaca- tion, but not move there. Many times he gate a "Dear John" letter. :r. 17. Herold fencl. He wanted to noted misdemeanors are `= 30 to 60 days, they would be released to the commun- ity. Mr. Endell replied, the question was not on misdemeanors, and agreed they are released here now. 18. City Manager Brighton. He asked about the statement regarding Borough support of the facility that was withdrawn. Dove Carey said, they could not withdraw, but they did quantify. 19. Lady. Where dose it go from here? Mr. Endell replied, :;;:c MA:•;y M;1 %_.; he had to review all the material. How do you evol- uate public opinion? He did not know. He has to depend a great deal on community leaders. Lady. How can you do this when the Borough has sent a resolution without a public hearing? Mr. Endell replied, Is it the some as people sending a petition - without information.He has documents that are in _ support and in opposition. Now do you evaluate a r _ community? Government offices, Chamber of Commerce, and business leaders support it. a 20. John Douglas. The Borough resolution was gust to support the State looking at a site. There wee e 2nd resolution asking that if the State was inter- ` ested in Wildwood, they would hold public hearings. 21. Bob Bergen. Has he taken Into consideration those ` in favor have special interests and own pieces of land? Mr. Endell replied, yes. As for financial Interests, he doesn't care who the owners are. He �,• has to make a determination if it is a viable site and see from the community if we can be good neighbors. Mr. Bergen. A lot of people had vested interests. Mr. Endell replied, that is not his affair. He has to act -, responsibly for all Alaska. Who owns It not his �.G. affair. Mr. Bergen said it would if he went by yea ve no vote. 22. Howard Wilson. He asked, how do you know whether the petitione are actual signore or not. Mr. Endell replied, he agreed. It is difficult to gauge public - - - opinion. Usually people who come to a hearing are those opposed or who want to know. t 23. Lady. All 200 of her signatures are signed by them. `i 24. Man. He asked Mr. Endell if he said there were no serious incidents on escapees? Mr. Endell replied, no, just very rare. Men. What are the disadvantages of a farility? Mr. f Endell replied, looking at an ugly fenre. That is his perspective. Also, people having sears of the i institution. � � ....raj . M:... ._✓r." .... ,.� , .,¢.n1 i f 1 i Public Hearing - Propound Jail Facility Hatch 3, 1993 Page 11 25. Lady. Not everyone is Wildwoed to an owner. Has he addrennod renter problems in the area? Hr. Endell replied there are 126 rontora, and various facilities. He didn't one any problem with working with them. The foncea may be clean in name, areas and may not he esthetic. That to up to the land owners. Lady. To he aware of any lieno? Mr. Endell replied, that to for the legal dopt. to handle. 26. Hon. What would it take it they proved the majority did not wont the facility? Mr. Endell asked, why polarize the community? We need to get togother and work thin out. We con get along very well. He would Insist the superintendent got involved with the community and that we hove s community odvioory board. That has boon done in Eagle River for n number of yoarg. It started with a problem, but has worked very well. He added, someone told him during break that he had been incarcerated and woo changed afterwards. Mr. Endell said they do not intend to warehouse them, but to change them. They have n 66% oucc000 rate. Their objective is to make law-abiding citizens out of them. Nan. Con we put a price on hurting one of our citizens? Mr. Endell replied, he would encourage him to call the citizens of the 10 arena where there are Institutions. Ask them. He has a daughter and a son, and a wife. He to no different than they are. No has knowledge how corrections ahould operate. He needs trust, cooperation and he will guarantee output. 27. Lady. Ne had said the people for and the people against balance, and that would create polarization. It is meet likely It will go in because he to the one who will push for it. Government, business went it. Could it ever be a veto of the community? Mr. Endell replied no. 28. Non. Could Hr. Endell give them o dote? Mr. Endell said, if he decided tonight, it would be several weeks befora he could start. So there to much time for further testimony. There could not be another hoarinq, he does not have time. 29. Hon. Where do you write to give opinions. Hr. Endeii replied, Pouch H03, Juneau. 30. Tom Wagoner. He hag 2 daughters. He just came beck from Hawaii. No would feel onfer with o facility than in the areas he woo in loot year. When you nooses what could happen to women in the area, there is a lot more danger from people in the community than from people in prison. Every parent lives with that, day to day. - .-;ir,r.,--tom• __- . t, Publin 1faorin•.1 - Propaaod nail facility March 3, 178' Page 12 IV. A07011RNMCNI City Manager Brighton thanked all who contributod and conolrotulated them for their courtooy. He added, thin Le t not o City hooting, but State. No have juot provided the E recilitiea. Meotinq adjourned of 10#55 PM. ! v Jonet Whelan City Clerk, City of Kenai t I Sr�a"ia.dllJf � , . i I •.r.:ao_�r, r�?;F+w�y�.�ri/i�sag1'rti��in,�4 1 9 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING MARCH 16, 1983 - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 846-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Relocation of Security Fencing - $379500 2. Ordinance 847-83 - Repealing and Re -Enacting Kenai Municipal Code - Borough Provisions for Levy and Collection of Sales Tax 3. Resolution 83-22 - Transfer of Funds - Maintenance Agreement - Word Processurs - 4. Resolution 83-25 -Award of Contract - Install Carpet in Ft. Kenay - 4-0 Interiors 5. Resolution 83-26 - Transfer of Funds - Additional Utility Costs - $1,700 6. Resolution 83-27 - Request to Legislature Regarding Transfer of Powers from Borough to City 7. Resolution 83-28 - Awarding of Contract - Airport Vehicle Parking Lot Paving - Professional Design Assoc. - $18,348 B. Resolution 83-29 - Award of Contract - Engineering Airport Terminal Apron Extension - Mike Taurisinen - $19,400 9. Resolution 83-30 - Award of Contract - Engineering Standard, Richfield, Thompson Place - Wince, Corthell, Bryson - $16,000 10. Resolution 83-31 - Street Name Changes 11. Resolution 83-32 - to Legislators, Regarding Utilities Relocation, S8- 67 12. Resolution 83-33 - To Legislators, Regarding Sales Tax Exemptions, HB-132 A 13. Resolution 83-34 - To Legislators, Regarding Registration of Lobbyists, SS-137 14. Resolution 83-35 - To Legislators, Reqarding Supplemental Municipal Assistance, SB-17, HB-136 15. Change Order #8 - Blazy Const. - Gym a. Resolution 83-36 - Transfer of Funds - Gym - Change Order #8 - Blazy Const. D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, March 2, 1983 2. Bd. of Adjustment, March 7, 1983 E. CORRESPONDENCE F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. ' Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Discussion - Replacing Floors in Old Racquetball Courts 4. Discussion - Formation of Library Commission 5. Discussion - Appointments to P&Z 6. Discussion - Utilization of Airport Lands - Bob Bielefeld Request H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission S. Recreation Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT :cso�wwMiaGP W KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES MARCH 16, 1983 - 7sOO PM KENAI CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAYOR RONALD A. MALSTON PRESIDING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL A-1 Agenda Approval Agenda approved as submitted. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 847-83 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Relocation of Security Fencinq - $37,500 MOTIONs Councilmen Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to adopt the ordinance. There was no public comment. Councilman Ackerly asked, whet fence is being relocated and for whet reason? City Manager Brighton explained, the original ADAP application went in front of Willow St., this will include those inside the airport. Public Works Director Kornelie explained, this is only a email portion, the rest Is ADAP. We may be able to get this from FAA•if the bide are Is" enough. All the Iota are north of Willow. Motion passed unanimously by roll cell vote. C-2 Ordinance 847-83 - Repealing and Re -Enacting Kenai Municipal Code - Borough Revisions for Levy and Collection of Sales Tax MOTIONS Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilwomen Bailie, to adopt the ordinance. There woe no public comment. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-3 Resolution 83-22 - Transfer of Funds - Maintenance Agreement - Word Processors MOTION: Councilmen Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilmen Ackerly, to adopt the ordinance. There wee no public comment. Councilmen Waqonor asked if this was a 12 month contract to the next fiscal year or just the remainder of the year? Accountant Parnell explained, when we appropriated federal revenue money, we approved for one year, the contract is 1 t s through Feb. 19R4. Councilman Wagoner said we made a mistake on appropriating that amount for federal revenue sharing pant July 1. It is not need fiscal management. He added, City Manager Brighton will have to work out a budget for the balance of the year to June 30. We should correct now instead of later. What would happen if we just provided service to June 30? Mr. Brighton replied we would go ahead and budget for the fiscal year, anticipating Council would appropriate for the next year. He added, he did not know if they would contract for a 3 month period or not. He spoke to Finance Director Brown who felt that this was appropriate. Mayor Holston asked if we have previously used Federal Revenue sharing for this. Accountant Parnell replied yes, for the computer. Mayor Holston noted in past years we have tried to stay away from Federal Revenue funds for ongoing expenses. It should be in the regular operating budget. Accountant Parnell replied, normally they are. But usually they take it out of Federal Revenue the let year on new equipment, then the departments take it out of their budget. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman Wise, to amend the amount in each category to $350 which should cover the quarter plus 4 days. City Manager Brighton noted if we are required to pay 12 months in advance, the amendment prohibits us from doing that. Councilman Wagoner said there is no requirement to pay 12 months in advance on any maintenance contracts. We elect to. Councilwoman Bailie asked, this is a one-shot deal? Are the loot 3 months included in the budget? Accountant Parnell replied, yea, this to not good financial budgeting, but Finance Director Brown did not write the opera. City Manager Brighton explained, by d91nq it this way we can have continuity with the 12 month contracts. VOTE, Amendment (Failed)s Voss Wagoner, Wise Nos Ackerly, Bailie, Click, Measles, Holston VOTE, Main Notion (Passed): Vest Ackerly, Railie, Glicu, Measles, Wise, Malstun Not Wagoner C-4 Resolution 83-25 - Award o1 Contract - Install Carpet in Ft. Kenny - 4-0 Interiors MOTIONs Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Public Works Director Kornelis explained this has been up 2 times, but there are changes. The lot time he had anticipated using City crews, but now the crews are too busy. He added, 4 people picked up the specs, but only one bid. Mayor Holston explained, this is for the museum, but we did not vote because we did not know what would happen to the Fort. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 2 • �.x>:TN►1'.e:'Ji•AN5(P.r..+;LW,•+.•:: ��ul-rt%� s� C-S Resolution R3-26 - Transfer of Funds - Additional Utility Costs - $1,700 MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-6 Resolution 83-27 - Request to Leglalature Regarding Transfer of Powers from Borough to City MOTIONS Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Councilwoman Glick explained that one of the negative comments against this was that the Borough could take back the powers. State statutes will have to be changed. A new Administration could take the powers back after giving them to a municipality. Councilman Wagoner said it is rather facetious of us to consider this resolution right after we have sent a resolution to the Borough saying we are not Interested. This will also make the 3rd qo-around. Mayor Holston sugqeated if this was passed, maybe Council would be interested in peening the other resolution. Councilman Wagoner said there wee more than one reason for not pegging the lot one. VOTE (Poseed)s Yeas Ackerly, Bailie, Glick, Measles, Wise, Malston Not Wagoner C-7 Resolution 83-28 - Awarding of Contract - Airport Vehicle Parking Lot Paving - Professional Design Assoc. - $18,348 MOTIONS Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Public Worke Director Kornelis noted Airport Manager Swelley's letter, that he did not recommend doing the ramp In front of the terminal. It is Included in the resolution. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to amend the amount from $18,348 to $16,600 and delete the 4th paragraph. Councilwoman Glick asked, won't the ramp make access better? Councilmen Wagoner said some of the Council didn't think it was that much of a problem. We should not spend that money. Councilwoman Glick said we paid to have a good ramp put in, but the ramp is not Good. It Is temporary. If this is not adjusted, we will have to come back later, how much will it coat us? Councilman Wagoner sold the ennerete has nothing 3 -Mr�grll�r,fA�P:i�1:ALClcy� pry'%- :�;A•c.� .'�:r�.. � r � .�i.: to do with the street. The only thing missing in the wire. It is not in the elements and will not hurt up. Council- woman Glick said it should be done now. When the parkinq lot was done we were supposed to do it right. Puhlic Works Director Kornelio said the origtnal drawing called for a building with a ramp. The only change was, the romp comes to the curb and has a quard rail with stairs. Mr. Swalley thought the ramp was steep, he asked Architect Gintoii to get prices for stairs. Mr. Gintoli did not like this and wanted to hrinq the road up, he come back with 2 prices. Mr. Kornelis had a question with the portion of romp that was cut out, the elevation would have to be chocked. We may have trouble with ponding with the slope of the romp. He asked Mr. Gintoll if it could be done at a later date. Also, a portion of the ramp area will be covered. We had neglected to include engineerinq on this proposal. Council told us to include this. Enqineer LeShot had looked at the situation and he agrees that if this ramp does not work out we can change and it would not hinder the project. Council- man Wagoner said Council discussed the reasons it woe left out and the coats of breakinq out. Councilman Wise sold the idea was to put it as temporary till is put in paving. Councilmen Wagoner said we did not know if there would be a problem with anow and ice. That way we could pull it out and replace or go with pavement. It was not meant to be temporary. The reason for taking out the wire to if we had to change it would be easier. Councilwoman Sallie said it le not just ramp access. There is another area that is completely flat that will be used 90% of the time. The possible danger area is very smell. Councilwoman Glick said she is surprised that was not checked out before the concrete wee laid. Are we getting a rebate for the difference between the temporary and good slab? Mr. Kornelie replied the money wee traded off for railings. Councilmen Wise said it bothers him that the slope was raised to Council as a problem, now it is not. Mr. Kornelie said Mr. Swailey was in favor of steps alongside the terminal building. Mr. Kornelie did not realize we had both. VOTE, Amendment (Passed)s Yeas Ackerly, Bailie, Measles, Wagoner, Holston Not Glick, Wise VOTE, Main Notion as Amended (Passed): Yeas Bailie, Measles, Wagoner, Wise, Malston Not Ackerly, Glick C-8 Resolution 83-29 - Award of Contract - Engineering Airport Terminal Apron Extension - Mike Teuriainen-$19,400 MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Councilwoman Bailie asked about the extra plugs and the aircraft tie downs. Public Works Director Kornelie replied these would be imbedded in cement. Councilman Wise asked if this included the divider fence. Mr. Teuriainen replied he did not know. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 4 -4 C-9 Rsao Wt ion 83-30 - Award of Contract - Enginearinq Standard, Rich Field, Thompson Place - Wince, Corthell,Bryson - $16,000 MOTIONt IN Cound'ilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilmen Waqoner, to adopts•the resolution. Therd-wao no public comment. Councilmen Wise said he had no problem with the design study but ften it comes to fundinq this, he cannot support Rich Field. There is no one living on it. There are people who M ve on streets who need this more then land owners and specuilators. Motidh passed unanimously by roll cell vote. C-10 RdWolittion 83-31 - Street Name Chanqes NOTION s10•. Coundilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the resolution. Theret was no public comment. Councilman Wise asked to see this on a map. Public Works Director Kornelis reviewed the names. He explained a lot of theset are the result of recent 2 projects that will have wetetw 6 sewer. There were a lot of subdivisions being built). Watergate Way was a result of a request by Council. Plantffng 6 Zoning meeting of Jan. 26 had a resolution for this t' MUTE (P&ddd)s YessY,Ackerly, Bailie, Glick, Measles, Wagoner, Malston Not •-Wise C-11 Reeollution 83-32 - To Legislators, Regarding Utilities Relodbtion, 50-67 MOTION: n•:- CounEilman Hegales moved, seconded by Councilmen Ackerly, to adopt the resolution. Therd was no public comment. Coundilman Wise asked, where is the utility ordinance that thi9•should relate to? Public Works Director Kornelis replired, there wee a meeting of the utility companies, it to in draft form. There will be one more meeting. Because of other. -public works projects, this has been set aside. Coundilman Wagoner said he thought it sees important to have it before them so they do not have the problems they had lent 'year. Councilmen Wise said Glacier State identified dead 'lines and missed some on Helibouty Rd., necessitating tearing out 3/4 of the cables. This is a major problem that is not in the resolution, it should be pointed out to the Legislators. Atty. Roqers explained this resolution attempts to be a scaffold rather than a shot qun. Administration did not want to net Into an argument with the utilities. That would be better related to APUC hearings. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. S r 1 resivacas�.$atrrar�F+a.frr„1��:arirtd I • C-12-Resolution 83-33 - To Legislators, Regarding Sales Tax Exemptions, HB-132 MOTION t Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-13 Resolution 83-34 - To Legislators, Regarding Registration of Lobbyists, SS-137 MOTION: Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-14 Resolution 83-35 - To Legislators, Regarding Supplemental Municipal Assistance, 58-17, HB-136 MOTION: Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. /* t i Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-15 Change Order 08 - Blazy Conat. - Gym a. Resolution 83-36 - Transfer of funds - Gym - Change Order 08 - Blazy Conet. MOTIONS Councilmen Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to approve the change order. Councilman Wagoner asked, why do we need the extra floor socket? Public Works Director Kornelis replied, he talked to the builders regarding this to put it behind the back board. Then there would be an area for spectators. The original bid did not have an extra socket and pole. He has already ordered this, the cost is reasonable. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-15a: MOTION r Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion passed by unanimous consent. 6 RE D. MINUTES 0-1 Requlor Meeting, March 2, 1983 Minutes were approved as submitted, 0-2 Bd. of Adjustment, March 7, 1983 Minutes were approved no submitted. E. CORRESPONDENCE None F. OLD BUSINESS None G. NEW BUSINESS G-1 Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTIONS Councilwomen Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, to approve the bills as submitted. Notion passed by unanimous consent. G-2 Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 MOTIONS Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to approve the requisitions as submitted-. Motion passed by unanimous consent. G-3 Discussion - Replacinq floors in Old Racquetball Courts Public Works Director KornelLe explained, the wood in the existing courts is separating. He contacted Mr. Blazy, since he is putting in the floor in the new portion. This Is his quote. He had no recommendation. Atty. Roqers asked that Council defer a decision on this. He felt that if no notice was sent to Hallman Courts, there wag a one year warranty. There may not be an extended warranty, it was not signed. Nollmon may be willing to do something about it. It was his understanding time was not critical. Mr. Kornelis said Mr. Blazy wants to ship the flooring with the other shipment, but it is not critical. Atty. Rogers said it woo his understanding Hallman was notified, but only verbal. MOTIONS Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, that Council take no further action till the attorney has exhausted all tonal aspects to repair at no cost to the City. Councilwoman Glick said we have talked about the defect for a year. With constant the constant use they are gettinn, it Puts weer and teat on the floors. How great is our liability if somethinq should happen? Atty. Roqero said the courts do not constitute a danger. Something will have ty be done within a year. Councilman Wagoner asked if we would have to replace the floors. Atty Rogers replied there in an alternative, we could top nail and fill with putty. Mr. 7 T i a. r-mrr�r�sar,�rAf t'•1 I (I 1 t Kornolin Wild the man who is inotaliinq t,bo now flonrn recemmsndod taking the nxintinq floor and proouro and Install It flea floor over the old one, He added, thin La hooch inntead maple. It in n clip system, no other manufacturer hag it. It in tonqun and groove on the top of otyrefoom material. Cassnel lman Wagoner said we are making a Presumption the fluor to tint repairable, He may he better Off repairing. Ceuncilmon Hine naked if we had funds for thin. Recreation Director McGillivray said we have in the original ennotruction funds 519,400. He have costs on the hot tub system, we can trade the wooden ones for the fiberglass. He have all the figures exeopt eloctrielty, we have a rough antimoto on that. Thera La 69,600 available that could he used for thin, VOTE, Pootpnnements Notion panned unanimously by rail call vote. G-4 Dlacuoalon - Formation of Library Commission City Manager Brighton explained he attended a Library Board meeting, they suggested eliminating the Board In lieu of Council adopting an ordinance to provide for a commiasion like the Recreation, Harbor, ate. What they went to an opportunity to meet with repreoentatives of the Council to put together on ardinonce that both aides can agree on, If their board Le conotrueted an the other eommiesiono ore, they will have more influence. That is a legitimate concern, He suggested staggering of flea hoard members, That way they will have continuity. Councilman Hine oold there is no neceeoity to eittinq down. There are ordinanceo that are pro formo. He could mark up one, oubmit it in draft form and pass by Council. Mr. Brighton explained they were concerned that they wanted something they hod input In and wanted to have Council input. With a mooting there would be nothing that woo controveroiai, Councilman Measles said we should have done thin a long time sqo, Mr. Brighton cold he will be diacuooinq a work oosoion in his report and requested waiting till then. Council agreed to the request, G-3 Olocuaolon - Appointments to Phi Mayor Moloton said there are openingo on Borouqh and City P&Z, and asked if this could he discussed at the oame time. Council agreed to the request. Atty. Rogers reviewed the memo. He explained, the problem that exioto now is whether Mr. Costimore in still a member Of PhZ. Hio deciolon is he in not since he has missed 3 conoocutive meetings. None of his aboanceo were oxcueed. Further proof - memoo and Mayor O'Reilly'o thank you letter (written in past tonso). Mr. Contimore had said he would be absent. Mayer O'Reilly treated it that any in nominating a replacement. Council confirmed 4, not 3, At►,y, Rogers did not feel Council has to confirm , He wished to air thin in front of Council so there would he no more quentlono. APPOINTMENT TO CITY PLANNING h ZONIl7P.s 61 e 0 *ra4Y - , J .. t fill 11104 f Caft off, l l n+,il1 aaryflat' r mtivaIf, waronflood fly l aft too, l l nait UPitr l ff, 1.if fit nf i rm If 111 /tihnk far I If it lift/ Can+m 1 tin 1 tit+ fie pit onrr+matoo lift f,y Mayor M@lataa, Cnane11mati Hasfaanr a;if►iotanrf tlsn rnnnan to I,n Iffin nnant rant i tin hunk fornund and #still kitnwl atoaa of wisaf, pIr/ doul ff with, Ile hap aloo n,lprnnisarl fill tntftrnn6, Motinn poafaid by ftntiafmnuft nonnnnt, Clerk "Ionian Olga naked to nnl.iry Mr, /ahnk, flayar Malotoa rotiuntitad CalofnflI If #hay hnnr Or fitly Intarentad pnnpin to #live thrrlr nnm►tot in film Of Clerk Nhnlno flip art hnvn pilot+lip to oak, NI)if01ff ff Vh1 llF.PlIP rN1A110i Mayer MnI"toil aalfo, Wlt,h ColfnnII approval, too waft Id IIIto to nuhmlt the I Raman or) iintad an the 16m146 to the pankat, Couaailmnn Hnfoonor amid thin Joint point" nut why Ile Roar! Oar oalf p41, Why aholfld on hnvn to aalnef, I pnnpin on the ftorough Mayor, who live@ outaido the City appntlltO a member, Counallwomnn 4link paid that to ;he lea, Nnt,tl tie take all powora, It in their" Ivy etatlotn, MU 1111N Councilwoman Moak moved, annnnfond by enonefiman Meooleo, to aubrnit to tote Haroufoh the 3 nafneo angryanted fly the Mayor for dntoetioa an (farough heonfrrtrn f lanfllnti to Znninq not the City raprnnnotat,ivn, V91E ( Panned )t Yen Aokerly, llnitin, Iltiok, Meanlaa, HLen, Naigtotl NO Haypnor t3-6 Wouuaainn . lit i l irat ion of Airport, I nadn a (into 11f of ofoid Regaeot City Mnnnryor Nrifohton rovioaell the memo from Airport Mnoatfar liwetlay, No geld too fold fiat nannnuarlty aforao with, blot thorn Oro foaaationo the rent of COunail tihalold he aware nf, Ito Aid not fofaaryran With the rofouant, he hag ordered an appraIgot , I:afolnllooman (Slink affknrl if on load of Oonaepk Inane oppllaation nuhmittnd, Mr, Ilrltthtaa ropliod no, Cnuaallaoman Click Wald fa the pent, When on have find raryuento dealla(l with IMN nabdlvinlon Illation, it Ilan mfido to Vht, they name hank with a Ooneopt loann opptinat.inn and Note approved by W , M►, Nrifoostan replied hip agrand, hat tit Lose lent L'olorratl mentlnry ton @tin dirod'asf to font an approinol for tiff#), Caaaatiaematl (Slick. aakod,attV.What) Mr, Ninlnrnld came to the City -wag ton net dfrontod to ph/ 1ot9 Afoot title /info» an Opeek alth farkod t,oatlun, He try to mnnaurnfoa huofaoen bill Wlrnn an ntitabilobod euot,nmmr namoa in wa rnaka It diffinult, NaforanOe fo modo to tha hank lot of fobrfn Contnr flat atilltod, Hhna that Imago mfia foivan, that wnlo 1.10 ton trio Iatonatlrn 1, F&palr t►f afrrrroff. offfo In wet t►rflaft tit, I l i sod, An far Muoan i f too mist," nnmmotft o l i Irn that onto rat try to nananonflato an Ifit. ernrftfill party, it hntltarfi her, We hnvn find to ennnept lanna oppllnr,tlne, an afhrtrti, wo nnnfo fa Iota morn ronnleten►,, Mrtyar Mnl,ifnn tinfoil it won hfo unrhsf s►t,fnrl t aq Nlooffa I I Inflow Woo 114,141) I„silk horoann 1► +1101 oaf. sin eh,►nto with f ton enaf•ept I s,ngn, 1•nnnr 1 ( women f,I iel, onfsl when on titarfOld fhrnaaf, witft thot frrnaessbira, oe t,od ,f U 0 onspf Pittnrn fn all Ihnt Worn flat in rompllonen nor) (it forked pror.edurna to tako them beak. Mr, NrLillotnn rrmplainnrl, Admlsplot►nliall ntnrted prnnondlogo nfld dlnnnvarod I Won lisp rff►rl our Ineon nspd woo not it rrnndition of tl►n lonnn fit) they did not. Inlia" thrnagh, ';am" fir t.loe lnnnna rla not hove them. C000nfiwomnn think agknd, i►ben "n dfonoverod that, dirt wn not go hnnk to Ph/ minspton to ono "fiat their intent wan? then we annld fifty they ghagld eontinric and lion no a Inveror)e, Mr, R►ightnn Inpllfrrl lift dnoht.nd if we 00111d, Cnrinaftwgmnn 1711nk gold rogardU►g Mr, gwollnyfo fingotionn, Nr, Rieln/old loan tnNlied halorm, fingnrdinq the taviony, thin nhnold have been diftoanand linfore, Mr, Rlolorold wan wllllnq to poy aome of tho norvoy noota, Shin if) Harm Mr, Rifttofold ban roafiona why the other Into are not amnnohlo, Mr, firigliton onld it will depend off kiln npprgiool which way Mr. Riolnfeld will f;o, lln g►►bmlttod thin to Connell for review, Cnrineilman Naganor Hold we should font. no into the bifelnnao for tuition haoin000 man what they want, P,o+lnnilmon Ilion onld he objecte to the lotto, of) to whnt.her it in approvad by Ailmonlatratlnn, Ile not a nr►mbor of itamo that are nddroaofld to the City Manager with no commont, Ho hasp to anoumn tba City Nanonor opprovea, On "meld like to have cnmmnnt,q, Mt, Rrighton nail he tried to explain with thin memo, Na to trying to he no fair no pooffiblm "itbout onnrpinq Cofineil, Coonaflwnmon Glink naked Mr, Weinfeld it hn won eatir►flftd, Mr, Rialefold replied yam, I1, RPPQRtff 110-1 Pity Manager i "' "'"� +f'fa"r*'�� s►� City Nanngnr Brighton apoko, to Re line talked with reproaontotiveo of Municipal 1.804100 regarding !3R•i44, P1010110 Rmploynge Rolatlena Act, ., eliminating all local onvaritmont who noted oat of the Public Rolationa Oct, The City of Ke001 opted oat becnage it was o nnlon-t pe aitontlon, Thin pate them hook in the pr,ition of having to reeognixe and deal with them, They hnvn had nnn poblie hearing, 1 foirlonnko, Anctafago, lrloona opoko aga/net, The over- wholming number worn for it, were onion repreeen• totiveo, There in o hearing in Anchorage at Leglglq- tivo information Rfrlao 3-19-03, Ile intended to eppear against tlolq with Cnunnit approval, too hem talked with Mammr b ,inward City Monagato, finidotno Mayor, Palmer ` City Nonngor, Ho oagganted a reeolution oppoainn title, fharn will qn a ot,ot.n.wlde tolenonforanan 3-22.03 to Sioldotnn, He would urge any that non go to Anabornge of go to 601 dotnn to toottry, No felt if it In paoead it won't moon amploynon will get more money, but it will chanja the relotionohip with amployeen from that time on, dmininttvtian lion - dean rnnolilt,ione on the + yin +r err, +rrsu.v„ other 3 and written Inttorn on oupplemental Iii.C, .not your "heft wo got a hill on 1014 rmtaiftnge fee on all eontraato, it Como from a problem in fnirbanke that the City noftift not get fined, in tbay hlonkotnd the otato, ' fhiq le the name thing with rnflloonkrs find the Police Not, it in tragic they all molar, of►rfor for a local prnb lam , ~ 2, Tim 141nninwoki I►nr► nohmitted o reganaf, for $0,1110 for ot.ort.op monny prior to a hodgat ►ngarrot Inr i2',,f10q for noxt yen,, Mr, Ilrighknn will gelid it t,o the I fdor.,entinn Cawmirf,31nn firet, r '� 10 I , • �,rr!•„.•fir •./,J„�. ., ,.. ,e � Y►'N, lip, 4, I, 1'aunell hall a Intter from Ihn Nnmen'o Renourno Tenter, ►f" tIII nkn It rl((norvnn n work (sonoinn, Iho bu1111of, nhaulA he to rn(Inrll by the lot or 210 weak. In April to ot.ort (orhorlulino work oennlnno, MnitnNt Councilman Nognnor moved, onennded by Councilman Mannino, to direct the City Mnngnr To draft a ronnlution regardinq W-154 nbJaetlnq to thn eontent of th" hill, Nation ponond by unnnlmoun connant, 11-2 City Attorney Atty, Rngnrn (spoke, 1, CIA will he oubmittin" a written plan of bankruptay, It it) not the final any, 2, R"gnrding the linlehok land owap, Mr. tiolchok'o land in ennumbored. Atty, Rogarn told him nothinq will be done till it to Ion-oneumberod, bn am workinq an loan" litination. We or" ankle" the Court n reinetato on by veldinq the Inane no wo will hnvo o recordable don(Imanh , 3. Rogn►dine 159-69. Caunail ban a latter regardinq thin, M" Opoke to Nikki Gilman no to why we are not gettinq netteno, Ohn void theio urn none. No apoko to finny Chitwood, Municipal League. She did not teotify, lie onkod for o phone nail t ( night before if neceoofiry. If we qot any notice, it will he real ohort, M-1 City Monnger'o Report, Addition City Manager Rrlghton geld he had one more Item for the work onnoian, We hove naked FAA to roloean lando an the north aide of Lowton to permit reoidential huilding Iota, They are in the procono of rolooning t,hene, Aloo the went aide Of NalkOr Lane, On would auggoot we move the gre"n tan" hack 150 ft, to permit reoidential eonatruetion thorn, Theoo would make about 40 additional Iota available. Mayor Malct"n naked that it be neat to V67., Councilman 11too naked i1 they could nand no-huittn for water $ newer, Mr. Brighton replied thorn are no atub-onto an that aide of the atroot, 11-2 City Attorney Report, Contd, 4. Councilman Ankarly naked, in thorn anythinq now on Cable TV, Atty. Ro"arn replied, he hoo not heard a word clean the monting with Mr. Habitat, hia attorney find chief onginoor at the airport, Atty. Rogaro told them hin fonlings and offered to hear their fealingn no to any kind of incentivoo. They oaid they would he beck with Ougq"atnd alharnativeo to hin ouggoations. /thin won a percentage of the gr000j, They did not 111to that. They have had much timn #,a nomn up with alternatives, M" told theta he would recommend we not enter into any ogroomant with them, rouneilmon Meaolao oald he, Mayor Moloton, and City Manogor firightan have been Invited to come up March 203, Councilman Ackorly naked, don't they hove one year to do aom"thlnq? Atty. Rngero replied, ha did flat recall, They have been boving orobloma In Anehorogn, Counellwnman ►flick "aid Council ghsuld remember Cgr►nrli took a pnnitlon which company they prefnprod, prodlrntad on ar,tinno in Anebornrla. we did not ouppnrt them at the hoarinq, Atty, Rooms gaid 11 , I F 1 he one apprnarhad by Atty, 5orinky abnut ioldntna. Atty. Reaers nuggentad that oinno they wore the name company and enminq off the name alto, we ohould share. A concerted front wnuld bit cnndualve to a hotter anrooment, Counell dinasnoad invitlnq the Pablo TV people to the March 20 work oonoien. Atty. Rogero noted he ban ,joined a ouh-nommittea of municipal attorneys regardinq cable TV on he hen oceons to Information, Council agrand to invite the Cable TV people to the April h, 1903 Council mootinq no it could be recorded. hRRK SKSfi [ ON 1 Council oqrnod to achad►►le a work aeoaion for March 28 at 7sOO PM with the i ltomo dinaunned, Clark Whelan won naked to achodulo the work 0000lon. 11-1 Mayor None 0-4 City Clark Clerk Whelan noted oho will be attendinq a Clorklo Seminar In Anahoraqe March 20 throuqh April 1. H-S finance Director None H-b Plnnnlnq h Inninq None 14-7 Harbor Commloolon None H-A Recreation Comm/anion None t. PERSONS PRESENT NOT ICHEO11tED TO BE HEARD 1. Puhile Worka Director Kornelie. On item C-R, aircraft parking. There to a barrier fence In the propoeal. He agr000 it to a bad pooltlon for onow removal and llmitinq to aircraft, He will inform the contractor next week. Ito purp000 woo to provide a barrier for email pianoo an one aide and largo aircraft necurity. Councilmen Wognnor naked, how many can they park now? City Hanngor Rriqhton replied. in the oummor there are an many no 14 or 15, HOrtONs Councilman Hnqnnor moved, onronded by Couneilwamon 4/irk, to direct, Adminiukra►ion to inform the anginaer to eliminate the fence, Motion penned by unaoimnuo con.►ant. 12 2. Councilwoman flick nail regardinq 5R-154, Oinny Ch►twood did tentify. 3. Councilwoman Glick nnkod, havo we Purchanod the land for the gym? City Manager Brighton replied, it won our intent to purchano but we did not have onnugh money. We hope we can purchooel lot. We may be able to buy j two. We are purchaoinq no much an we can. 4. City Mananor Brighton oeid regarding the gym, tying in the qym to the preeent roe center. Adminintration Moo naked to review. glory Conot. hoo vent Public Worko Director Kornelia a memo regarding thin. Councilman ' Wagoner oeid we do not have enough money for oil these thingo. S. Councilman Wagoner onked if o committee woe formed for the 25th anniveroory celebration. We ohould consider thin at a future date. Councilman Wine oeid the $25,000 for promotion of the City could be uoed. ADJOURNMENT ' Mooting adjourned at MOO PM. �'�; r�'rJ. l.�i.�.�r••••..'.7•"s.S:..1,; •'• ••,. • �9.��,• IN IT/�<�G�iv. Janet Whalen City Clerk i 13 ' f t L� KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING MARCH 16, 1983 PARTIAL TRANSLATION H-2 Attorney's Report Councilman Ackerly asked is there anything new on Cable TV. Atty. Rogers replied, he has not heard a word since the meeting with Mr. Uchitel, his attorney and chief engineer at the airport. Atty. Rogers told them his feelings and offered to hear their feelings as to any kind of incentives. They said they would be back with suggested alternatives to his suggestions (his was a percentage of the gross). They did not like that. They have had much time to come up with alternatives. He told them he would recommend we not enter into any agreement with them. Councilman Measles said he, Mayor Malston, and City Manager Brighton have been invited to come up March 28. Councilman Ackerly asked, don't they have one year to do something? Atty. Rogers replied, he did not recall. They have been having problems in Anchorage. Councilwoman Glick said Council should remember Council took a position which company they preferred, predicated on actions in Anchorage. We did not support them at the hearing. Atty. Rogers said he was approached by Atty. Serisky about Soldotna. Atty. Rogers suggested that since they were the some company and coming off the some site, we should -share. A concerted front would be conducive to a better agreement. Council discussed inviting the Cable TV people to the March 28 work session. Atty. Rogers noted he has joined a sub -committee of municipal attorneys regarding cable TV so he has access to information. Council agreed to invite the Cable TV people to the April 6, 1983 Council meeting so it could be recorded. la-, - Jenet Whelan City Clerk }11 Ig UH 4-6-83 &r PAYMENTS OF $1,000.00 OR MORE FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL RATIFICATION VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROJECT/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT CHARGE. AMOUNT Poo FOR APPROVALS ? Blasy Construction Gym Construction CP-Gym Construction 47,020.00 Doyle's Excavating Final Payment CP-Section 36 W 6 S Construction 11,655.12 Nelson 6 Assoc. Engineering Services CP-1st 6 2nd Ste. Engineering 9,465.00 s TAMS professional Services CP-Port Facil. Engineering 18,765.04 Professional Services CP-Port Pacii. Engineering 20,166.20 Professional Services CP-Harbor Study Engineering 3,129.60 Walters 6 Olson Equipment Policy Non-Dopartmental Insurance 1,631.00 ' Wince. Corthall 6 Bryson i Engineering CP-Candlelight 6 Lin. Engineering 2,575.00 FOR RATIFICATIONS A.M.E.F.C.U. March Credit Union W/H Various Liability 17,013.00 Blue Cross April Medical Insurance Various Health Insurance 14,601.81 Glacier State Telephone March Phone Service Various Communications 2,146.70 KUSCO March Natural Gas Usage Various Utilities 4,113.23 f` Marathon Oil CO. February Natural Gas Trust 6 Agency In Trust 9,567.23 National Bank of AK March Federal W/H General Fund Liability 41,965.03 Union Oil February Natural Gas Trust 6 Agency In Trust 9,569.92 National Bank of Alaska Treasury Bill 3/20/83 Central Treasury Central Treasury 1,040,000.00 t First Federal Savings REPO 3/16/83 Central Treasury Central Treasury 1,000,000.00 i 7.75X Int. l� REQUISITIONS OVER $1,000.00 WHICH NEED C01INCIL APPROVAL 4/6/83 VENDOR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT AMOUNT Alyeaka Sales Summer Tlres Shop Repair 6 Maint. .Supplies I,0w.60 Anderson's Sweeping Sweeping Kenai City Streets Streets Repair 6 Maintenance 6,Son. On J.C. Bookey Excavating Lower Lawton Dr, Lift Station PR -Sewer Construction 2,400.00 Craig Taylor Equip. Poethole Auger, Log Splitter, Brush PR -Parke Machinery 6 Equipment 2,534.70 Cutter for Tractor Ron's Rentall Riding Mower w/ Catcher FR-Parke Machinery 6 Equipment 2,095.00 Totem Tile 6 Tope Materials 6 Installation for walls CP-Youth Center Construction 3,478.00 and floor in Spa Room Totem Tile 6 Tops Turbo Hot Tube less trade in on CP-Youth Center Construction 3,478.00 wooden not tube. Includes chlorinator Vanco Recreation Inc. 6- 15 ft. Aluminum Benches CP-Mist. Park Improv. Machinery 6 Equipment 1,314.00 Vidio Service Center VCR Film Purchased with State Jail Small Toole 6 Minor Equip. 3,843.50 Water Systems of AK Chlorinator for Wellhouse 01 Water Machinery 6 Equipment 1,690.00 White's Plumbing Labor 6 Materials for Drain Hook-up CP-Youth Center Construction 1,660.00 6 Installation for Hot Tube Young 6 Young'uns Hustler Pool Table CP-Sui,ior Center Machinery 6 Equipment 1,945.00 Kelly Electric Electrical Work for Hot Tube CP-Youth Center Construction 2,350.00 s '. Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 848-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE JAIL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BY $6,500 AS A RESULT OF A CONTRACT INCREASE i FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA. WHEREAS, the Kenai Jail facility has experienced overcrowding caused by the Division of Correction's inability to accept i prisoners because of lack of bed space, and WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has recognized the cost associated with this condition by increasing its contract with the City by $69500. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: ` Jail Fund %tease Estimated Revenues: ! State Jail Contract $6,500 Increase Appropriations: Operating Supplies $6,500 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of April, 1983. { RONA D A. MALS ON, MAYOR ATTEST: •Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Reading: April 6, 1983 Second Reading: April 20, 1983 Effective Date: April 20, 1983 Approved by Finance: Q 1 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 849-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1982-83 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $270 AS A RESULT OF A DONATION FOR A COMBINATION STRETCHER CHAIR. WHEREAS, the City has received a donation of $270 from Mr. & Mrs. Leighton Mishau for the purchase of a combination stretcher chair to be used in the Kenai Fire Department ambulance, and WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appro- priations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenuess Miscellaneous Donations $270 Increase Appropriations: Fire -Small Tools & Minor Equipment $270 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of April, 1983. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk APPROVED BY FINANCE: 4Aa RONALD A. IMALSTON, MAYOR First Reading: April 6, 1983 Second Reading: April 20, 1983 Effective Date: April 20, 1983 G-s ��������,+►r,e,! bys Adminifitration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0, 050-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA IN- CREASING, ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE SENIOR CENTER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND BY $12,990, AND TRANSFERRING AN ADDITIONAL $21,265 WITHIN THE FUND, FOR PAVING OF THE NARKING LOT. WHEREAS, the City hen received a proponal for a cshange-ordor to the Senior Center project to pave the parking lot at a coot of $3492159 and WHEREAS, $21,Z65 may be provided by tranoforring monioo from the Land account and the Contingency account, and the balance of the required monioo may be provided by the General Fund Capital Improvement Reoervo, and WHEREAS, the City dooireo that thin project include the paving of the parking lot. WHEREAS, proper accounting practices roquiro that all appropria- tiono of City monioo be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA Chats Section 1s The following incronolto in antimeted revenuflo and appr— o- pr ia'iono be modes General Fund ncreaae atimated Revonueos Appropriation of R000rvo for Capital Improvemonto lu `( Increaao Appreprintionos Non-Departmental-Tranofvro out Sonior Center Capital Project Fund ncroaaa totliantoa Novoistioas Tranofor from General Fund Increaae Appropriationos Construction, Soet,inn 21 The following trannforn hit modi►s aonior cooker CH 1is - trsl _Pro• Lint b tind Frow Land $14t000 Continganey 7 269 Tot i Ccsncstr�tr�tign �2/,fig PA0SKE3 BY TEEI; COUNCIL OF POK PITY OF KFNAI, ALASKA, thio 20th day of April, 1903, ATTE;01s efle , o1 an, y er Approvod by F1noncos_Cqj_ First Readings April 6, 1963 Second Readings April 20, 1963 Cffoativo Moo April 20, 1983 2 a'.//or1,o A91Y APO" SW v1►invd op� o.L .9/6, 54 E 0 wow wvcv 1✓0 9 vi✓N#V;;p 9 /Y1oyOY NO Nrfdl WV 9yi1AVAIW 4f rYWja 9/YIW7'v/ 10,N.d -jeO JWPWOv/0 ww/a l t RAwoe °G S'Oyn� a��,� sn Ya► .� gaatsaQ aauasr►e /+ WILWO p21 TOM pasalwgns 6ttnpoudeag do Ilona so" word zvsoa 001 MI $ sa;�n8 9 gsnaZ 000£059Z $ Su�evd •pun Ova av goalp 99vulvsp ago puv Ktemple aqa 3o pun ago ueux3aq aPIn �J91 Puv 'zsodsea aqa av app �OZ el 6vAaelsp eqy •Suldlsae ago pun 'atvgdev 3o ,,Z 'taeesS 1-0 30 „Z 'ual3vandesd axle jo paevq el asngl; elgb •not Sulnsvd euaz1310 solueS aqa anvd oa valid Aw el Sulmollo3 'ncA Aq pagetusna uvtd ante papoa sotoa aqa 3o poevg i •uawsv0 sea([ £ 11966 exeatd 'leuag SZ91 xoS'0'd 1103UTO auaaulA uawsv0 !oy C961 `tZ gvsvW %: • left-999 INONd Bldj� i 69966 WlIOVIV 'rN1O01Q9 , .-V 0116 XOa OA uVitinspuQ liltu� i „_ NIOTIC PLEASE DISREGARD PREVIOUS IMAGE, DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REFILMED ON FOLLOWING FRAME, ..::Ulu. lnu� C�an�t�rur#�n►n r� f , P. O. BOX 914 r. S 100TNA, ALASKA 99669 :1PHONE 262-4631 frovJ011111 March 21, 198: To; Carmen Vincent Gintoli P.O.Box 4625 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Carmen. Based of the color coded site plan furnished by you, following is my price to pave the Senior Citizens parking lot. This figure is based of site preperation, 2" of D-1 gravel, 2" of asphalt, and the striping. The driveway is 20' wide at i the carport, and 16k' wide between the end of the sidewalk and the drainage ditch at each end. Paving $ 26503.00 2'curb S gutter $ 7712.00 TOTAL $ 34,215.00 PROM THQ DESK OP Respectfully submitted, Keith Kosuelis yy//8j 'ev, 150 13 Zr W W-40,40 ReliITE /Lawrence Derleth T�e,4NSFCR Fa*/QS T Ave TE LD/mm Div ,owee oc ;wes meo owsac /s q D/46itof#rf O/-' TAW ANAV 6 LoT. /T rWgCo o? .Weere d& FOB¢ Ae�o, 0I0.C• AI _ Ndx ?' Lod vGI c 0sEQr/4/* �eo40x -____—._—�_-__.e...._._._. .—_ I 0 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 851-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA DED- ICATING THE USE OF TRACT B, PARK VIEW SUBDIVISION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A SHELTER FOR BATTERED WOMEN. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai, Alaska'received Patent No. 523 from the State of Alaska which authorized the conveyance of Tract B, Park View Subdivision (being a portion of Government Lots 128 and 156), and WHEREAS, City of Kenai Resolution 67-38 dedicated the afore- mentioned lands to -park and recreational use, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has reserved additional lands for parks and recreational use in lieu of the described property, and WHEREAS, Kenai Municipal Code 22.05.050 requires that land to be dedicated to a different public use shall be determined by -the City Council by ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Kenai acknowledges the need for a shelter to accommodate battered women and their children in a secured facility, and WHEREAS, the Kenai-Soldotno Women's Resource and Crisis Center is motivated to construct such a facility within the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, the development of the proposed facility would address a social service need in the area as well as contribute to the economic well-being of the City, and WHEREAS, Tract B, Park View Subdivision is deemed to be a desirable location for the shelter for battered women. i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i KENAI, ALASKA that Tract B, Park View Subdivision is dedicated for use of constructing a shelter for battered women. — i 4� 11 . PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of April, 1983. , MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clark First Reading: April 6, 1983 Second Reading: April 20, 1983 Effective Date: May 209 1983 2 i r� KQ..s:�SPV� ia1wY Al PARK VIEW SUED/ VISIOA LOCATED W/TN/N B.L. A/. LOTS /28, 8 /52-/97o (ALL WHIN ME NEPW SEC.6 , T. J N.,R.//W.,am.., C/TYOFKE. 4452 AC. TOTAL ARE A oo R"`` 6� 30 `iiY a 1i Li . I O I y �0 kOlb S.89°•Sfi.4VE. �tS� 374 • S4 �. . 10 utll. eostement .� 1 a. / TR.4Vr "6" .a N t . go y• 1.333 AC. Blutt line I ry n N 89g4cJ E 69.12 In 30lot 1 _ I se/ of=cop i CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSMIP I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE I : OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN F AND THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS ' 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE CIT DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE, AND TH " UTILITIES, THE STREETS, ANO Ei CITY MANAGER SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED TO BEFC { PUBLIC, THIS dt2s.'''DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES PLAT APPROVAL THIS PLAT, HAVING BEEN APP ? BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSIC MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF_ IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED AN[; SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL CON ORDINANCES AND LAW APPERTAI Aw KENAI SPUR Ar THIS PROP. VICINITY MAP POR 5.6. T S N.. R I I W. i =800• I 100) Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 852-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA CREATING A NEW COMMISSION ENTITLED "ADVISORY LIBRARY COMMISSION", BY ENACTING A NEW TITLE 24 TO THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Kenai, Alaska in Article 2, Section 2-4 Council Powers, Item No. 2, permits the Council to enact legislation relating to any or all subjects and matters not prohibited by law or this charter,:and WHEREAS, the present library board is a self-perpetuating entity and performs no legal function under the charter or the codes of the City of Kenai, Alaska, and therefore performs no quasi - legislative function in relationship to the City Council or to the funding or operation of the Kenai Municipal Library, and WHEREAS, the -Kenai City Council and the Library Board both agree that the City, through the Mayor, should appoint an advisory board to be confirmed by the City Council and thereby creating an Advisory Library Commission responsible to the Mayor and the legislative body. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that there is hereby created an Advisory Library Commission described as follows: Title 24 ADVISORY LIBRARY COMMISSION 24.05.010 Creation: There is hereby created a Kenai t Advisory Library- ommTssion which shall consist of seven members who shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. A Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson of the commission shall be selected annually and shall be elected frort and by the - appointive members. The Mayor and one Council member elected by the Council as ex-officio members of the commission and as ----- consultants may attend all meetings but they shall have no vote. 24.05.020 Duties and Powers: (a) The Commission shall be required to do the following: (1) Develop, adopt, alter or revise subject to approval by the City Council, a master plan for the physical development of library facilities for the City. (2) Submit annually to the City Manager and Council a list of recommended capital and other improvements in regards to the library. (3) Make recommendations regarding any matter related to library service. (4) Serve as the liaison between the public and the City Council in regards to library service. (5) Work closely with the Kenai Community Library Board for the betterment of the Kenai Community Library. (6) Shall act in an advisory.capacity in the selection of the City Librarian. 24.05.030 Terms and Appointments to Vacancies: (a) The term of seven appointed members of the commission shall be three years except initial appointments shall be abbreviated terms so that terms in three years shall be staggered. (1) Two members shall be appointed for one year, two members.shall be appointed for two years, three members shall be appointed for three years. After the expiration of the initial appointments of all seven members, all re- appointments or new appointees shall be appointed for three year terms. (b) Terms shall commence on July 1 of each year: Vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor and confirmation of the City Council. 24.05.040 Qualifications of Commission Members: A member of the Kenai Advisory Library commission must e a resident of the City of Kenai and cannot be an officer or employee of the City of Kenai; if any member shall have three consecutive unexcused absences from regular meetings of the commission, move his residence from the corporate limits of the City of Kenai, or be elected or appointed as an officer or employee of the City of Kenai, then the service of such member shall automatically terminate. .'� 24.05.050 Proceedings of Commission: The commission shall -- establish rules of procedure provided there shall be regularly scheduled monthly meetings of the commission which shall be open to the public. Permanent records or minutes shall be kept of the commissions proceedings and such minutes shall record the vote of each member upon every question. Every decision or finding shall immediately be filed in the office of the City Clerk and shall be a public record open to inspection by any person. 24.05.060 Library Regulations: The Library Regulations shall be as listed under the regu ations section in the Kenai Code, Supplement #18 adopted on September 20, 1982 and all future updates. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of April, 1983. Ronald a a on, Mayor ATTEST: JaneE Whelang city clerk First Readings April 6, 1983 Second Reading: April 20, 1983 Effective Date: May 20, 1983 3 DEPT. OF 821MRONMEMAL CONSEt VXnON 1 Mr. Keith Kornel i s $TATC Director of Public Works ''"""'�""`"'°'�""'�^ P.O. Box 580 ' Kenai, Alaska 99611 ! ; 1 BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR 437 E Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907) 274.2533 RECEIVFD PuDlcla�Y'o�,Dept RE: Letter of Eligibility Haller, Evergreen, McKinley, 3rd, 4th, 27th and 32nd 1983 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Street Improvements Dear Mr. Kornelis: Your grant application for the referenced project has been reviewed and found eligible for grant funding. The nature of the project is the construction of sanitary sewer, water and street improvements on Haller, Evergreen and McKinley Streets and 4th, 3rd, 27th and 32nd Avenues. The pipe quantities needed are 1,975 linear feet of 12 inch and 11,776 linear feet of 8 inch ductile iron sanitary pipe and some 1,981 linear feet of 10 inch, 2,598 linear feet of 8 inch and 10,359 linear feet of 6 inch ductile iron water main and their related appurtenances. As you know, ADEC grant funds are temporarily depleted. Therefore, no grant offer can be made at this time for this project. Grant funds are likely to be available after the 1983 Legislature session. However, the amount of such funding is unknown. Vie cannot, therefore, assure you that this project will receive ADEC grant funding. This project is on the Department's statewide priority list for FY 84. If grant funds become available, the amount of the grant offer will be adjusted downward from the $1,012,141 requested. This adjustment accounts for the ineligible portion of the mobilization cost attributed to the street or other non -water and sewer improvements. The adjustment will result in a total eligible costs amount of $2,010,178. If a grant offer is made, the State grant offer will be in the amount of $1,005,089, one half of these grant eligible costs. See the attachment for adjustments of eligible costs line items. It is important to point out that any cost incurred more than 120 day prior to the date of the grant offer are not eligible for 50 percent reimbursement under the grant. Since we cannot predict the date of the grant offer, you shoo,ld be prepared to fund 100 percent of all the costs Mr. Keith Kornelis March 25, 1983 Page 2 incurred until the grant offer is made. It appears at this time that portions of the engineering design costs may become ineligible if grant offer is en which means all costs The wouldworst havecase towould borne eno solelyE by funding Cat a ity ll gof given r Tha►ik you for submitting the signed contract with Mike Tauriainen, P.E. for the design of the referenced project. The Department concurs with the award of the contract in the amount of (not to exceed) $67,200. However, only $48,283 is eligible for reimbursement if the costs are incurred within the 120 day rule. The design contract is approved for matters of concern to this dinspection Department. Please contractsend whencopy available.signed construction adminis- being tration anrheesandorresponse will be givenon or before April d uspecifications t referenced project currently 41983. reviewed Please do not hesitate to call or write this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Greg rage Construction Grants Engineer -- ; GM/djf Attachment cc: Mike Tauriainen y/ 1s 3 ....... to -- 1 i HALLER, EVERGREEN, McKINLEY, 3rd, 4th, 27th and 32nd 1983 SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS The pipe quantities needed are 1,975 linear feet of 12 inch and 11,776 linear feet of 8 inch ductile iron sanitary pipe and some 1,981 linear feet of 10 inch, 2,598 linear feet of 8 inch and 10,359 linear feet of 6 inch ductile iron water main and their related appurtenances. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Original ADEC Grant Appl. Revised ELIGIBLE COSTS Estimates Estimates 1. Administration $ - 0 - $ - 0 - �� 2. Legal Expenses - 0 - - 0 - 3. Engineering Design Fees 48,283* 48,283* 4. Project Inspection and Surveying 237,000 235,427 5, Construction 1,580,774 1,569,516 6. Equipment - 0 - - 0 - 7. Other Costs - 0 - - 0 - 8. Project Contingencies 158,226 156,952 TOTAL $2,024,283 $2,010,178 STATE GRANT OFFER AMOUNT $2,010,178 x 0.50 - $1,005,089 * Eligible portion of NTE $67,200 signed contract. 3 t 4 Cv t�C�'a �`� r ; , � � ! j �^•1 ,�r.: %��( ';�; BILL 51111P IELD, pQVI.' MOM fir'`` DICVT. or 2XVI t0XXXXTA1. CI►XNEItYM711i11 % 437 a weer, Guile 200 Anchorage, NOW 00501 / (007) 2144033 March 26, 1983 ,A tor. Keith Kornelis Director of Public Works I Srq -" P.O. Box 580 ' Kenai, Alaska 99611 , 1 RE: i r' 040 �C,Y p cll. ubll a lyofk0,� Revised Letter of Eligibility �• ' Candlelight, Linwood, Lawton, Aurora', Kaknu, Kiana Streets - Water, Sewer and Street Improvements 1983 Dear Nr. Kornelis: Your revised grant application for the referenced project has been reviewed and found eligible for increased grant funding. This project now includes possibly five schedules of water, sewer and road const1ruction work for Candle- light, Linwood, Aurora, Kaknu and Kiana Streets and 260 Avenue H.E. in Kenai, Alaska. The total water and sewer work amounts to 110083 linear feet of 8 and 12 inch DIP sanitary sewer and 10,656 linear feet of 6, 8 and 12 inch DIP water main plus related appurtenances. The road construction work is ineligible for ADEC grant reimbursement. 4 As you know, ADEC grant funds are temporarily depleted. Therefore, no grant offer can be made at this time for this project. Grant funds are likely to be available after the 1983 Legislature session. However, the amount of such funding is unknown. We cannot, therefore, assure you that this project will receive ADEC grant funding. if grant funds become available, the amount of the grant offer will be adjusted downward from the $714,127 requested. This requested amount is $187,477 more I than the adjusted grant eligible amount of $526,650 determined from our review of the original grant application of June 8, 1982. t that time, the Dcosts, meat did not have grant funds to finance 50 percent of the project costs. This department has been out of water and sewer construction grant funds since December 1981. Presently a statewide priority list has been developed to fund ^ , eligible projects up the extent funds become available. This project is on the -- priority list for fY 84. An ad ustment was made to the engineering design cost. It is assumed that all eligi�Ie costs for the design contract of Narch 19, 1981 will have been incurred before the 120 day period preceding any possible grant offer date. Thus, these costs are ineligible. The design contract of October 7, 1982 may have the same consequences but those incurred costs may yet be within the 120 day rule if a grant offer is awarded early summer 1983. Therefore, the eligible portion Mr, K. Kornelis March 24, 1903 Pago 2 of $28,766 out of $51,500 will be the oni,y amount included in the Engineering Design fee entry, The adjustment will result in a total eligible costs amount of U A09,35A, if a grant offer is made, the State grant offer will be in the amount of $704,677, ono half of these grant eligible costa, See the attachment for computations. it is important to point out again that any costs incurred more than 120 days prior to the date of the grant offer are not eligible for 50 percent reimburse- ment under the grant, Since we cannot predict the date of the grant offer, you should be prepared to fund 100 percent of all the costs being incurred until the grant offer is made. Thank you for submitting the latest signed contract with Winco, CortheiI, Bryson Bryson for the design of the referenced project, The Department concurs with the award of the contract in the amount of (not to exceed) $51,500. However, as mentioned above, only $20,780 is eligible for reimbursement if those costs are incurred within the 120 day rule. The design contract is approved for matters of concern to this Department. Please send a copy of the signed con- struction administration and inspection contract when available, A limited, amount of in-house force account labor and equipment ($1,000) will be used to administer the various contracts associated with the referenced project, As stated on the grant assistance application form, administration costs are not eligible for grant reimbursement if performed by existing staff working normally scheduled hours, An exception to this policy has been made when a grantee uses staff engineers or technicians to perform technical duties to protect the grantee's interests under engineering or construction contracts. Examples of those duties may include, but are not necessarily limited to, technical review of contracts, technical review of contractor's or consultant's work and reviews of plan and specifications, to keeping with the above, in- house force account labor and equipment is approved for technical and engineer- ing assistance with contract administration, The plans and specifications for the' referenced project are currently being reviewed and our response will be given on or before April It. 1983. Please do not hesitate to call or write this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, .l Grog Nagoe Construction Grants Engineer Attachment cc: Wince, Corthell, Oryoon ors-::,;�;,.�a.! tl�.... .... A/i.... ....... ::_.i f CANDLELIGHT, LINWOOD, LAWTON, AURORA, KAKNU, KIANA STREETS - WATER, SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1983 The project includes possibly five schedules of water, sewer and road construction work in Kenai, Alaska. The total water and (fewer work amounts to 11,083 linear feet of Q and 12 inch DIP sanitary sewer and 10,656 linear feet of 6, 0 and 12 inch DIP water main plus related appurtenances. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Original AOEC Grant App1. Revised ELIGIBLE COSTS Estim tao Estimates 1. Administration $ 10,000 2, Legal Expenses - 0 - - 0 - 3, Engineering Design Fees 47,600* 28,700" = 4. Project inspection and Surveying 165,640 166,548 5, Construction 1,103,663 1,103,653 6. Equipment - 0 - - 0 - i 7, Other Costs - 0 - - 0 - S. Project Contingencies 110,366 110 t365 r TOTAL $1,428,254 $1,409,354 4 I - STATE GRANT OFFER AMOUNT -- $1,409,354 x 0.50 a $704,677 Eligible portion of the March 19, 1991 and October 7, 1982 signed contracts. Revised eligible portion, E 1 c: SS� ! t; ooA� AU14o� ",e C- � //jo lr�r� /) Aga- AW 0' oOQ:7Voee.4 doc ticiP z) ViG Fes• .44 ,Aew 06o7 WnA osc. &71 *00,*a jaosov j&40..ca 4womara. #," 4mazim .00 Wela ArA�r - /4. " e 444,z� 1UW A -44V Ay 011 low 7.) ISO olafe4mo-oow ha er poe AIX pea 'Itow Pas 7wjgo, "moo 8p• *,*W O�+.c� AG''C ji�0� ess / w'''�v —•o� �cl�e c do/ , !� �3 "� � �3 �' Y3 �•s• <5os7- 4F7S* T. ,C$c e. Pao,--ec - - ,r o yAT11F3 C. ANY cows lNeexa0r� 124 eo A 7`-o 0,4 rram occ' No T EL/ G elfilG E' Dec, /, 7f�e 9// 7-0 rAL. al 7S4% G a 7,0 -el a!o 9/ // I7�1.-ceps AtCr72 & • 7 -oV.a 0v Sao C1 frs January 1983 February 1983 March 1983 April 1983 May 1983 S M TW T F 8 S M TW T F S 8 M TW T F 8 S M TW T F S S M TW T F 8 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 8 2 3 4 8 8 7 8 6 7 0 9101112 8 7 8 9101112 3 4 S 8 1 9 8 91011121314 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 1011 12 13 B 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 . 18 17 iB 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 2 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 34 28 26 27 28 29 2728 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 30 31 June 1963 July 1983 August 1983 September 1983 8M TW T F S S M TW T F S S M TW T F S S M TW T F S 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 81 6 6 7 8 910114 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 7 8 910 13I 4 5 6 7 8 910 12 1314 15 16 17 18' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 1S 18 11 ttt999999 11t1119 20 ' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 1983 November 1983 December 1983 S M TW T F S 8 M TW T F S S M TW T F 8 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9101112 4 5 8 7 8 910 9 1011 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 W, �-9 HARBOR STUDY Appropriation in Engineering $411,672 Contract - TAMS <131,392> Contract - CH2M Hill < 65 000> Balance Available 2 ,280 Proposed TAMS Contract <135,600> Balance (if contract approved) 79�_80 Scope of Proposed Contract (TAMS): 1. Demand analysis and facility inventory 2. Analysis of functional requirements 3. Environmental review 4. Formulation of conceptual harbor alternatives 5. Selection of a preferred alternative 6. Financial benefit analysis Scope of Existing Contract (TAMS): 1. Literature and data search 2. Field investigation (bluff erosion) 3. Analyze operational characteristics of alternative harbor forms 4. Mathematical model of hydraulic and sediment regime, test alternative harbor forms and configurations 5. Prepare report on remedial measures to ameliorate or eliminate erosion of bluff area 6. Final analysis, recommendations and report Scope of closed contract (CH2M Hill): I. Scope of Site A (Roper's leases) evaluation and conceptual layout a. Identification of hydraulic and coastal conditions b. Identification of environmental issues c. Identification of utilities d. Evaluation of site access e. Soil investigation f. Preparation of conceptual design layouts PORT FACILITIES GRANT Appropriation in Engineering $150,000 Contract - TAMS < 83 150> Balance Available 6 B 0 Scope I. Re-establish corners of Kenai Boat Ramp plat 2. Prepare a rendering of that portion owned by Coyles and locate existing improvements 3. Prepare an as -built survey of existing Kenai Boat Ramp 4. Prepare plans, specs and a coat estimate for the followings a. Sheltered eating area b. On -site water and sewer facilities c. Showers - - d. Expansion/repair of existing boat ramp e. Tent camping area f. Dock fueling facilities - g. Locate future parking h. One boat repair grid - 50 foot boat r i i i iA(1 1 W TAMS TIPPETTS -ABBETT - MC CARTHY- STRATTON A PROWNSIOYAL fW101MOV F.\GI\F.FRS February 15, 1983 Mr. William J. Brighton, City Manager City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, AK 99611 Subject: Small Boat Harbor Financial Analysis and Outline Design Dear Bill: We are pleased to submit herewith our proposal for the financial analysis and outline design phase of the small boat harbor project. The study as proposed will consist of an analysis of the commercial and recreational demand for a harbor in Kenai; development of design alternatives and selection of a preferred alternative; and a detailed analysis of construction and • operating costs as well as potential economic benefits. A separate environmental review will identify potential impacts created by the harbor, and will be the first step of an ongoing process of consultation and cooperation with concerned state and federal regulatory agencies. The summary report will be distributed to interested citizens as well as the state officials who will determine funding. The total estimated cost of the study is $135,600. Our staff is available to commence work immediately after notification to proceed, and based on the enclosed schedule can complete the proposed work by late August of this year. This will allow . time for final design and permit acquisition prior to the 1984 r construction season. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our proposal and look forward to continuing our service to the City of Kenai. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, TIPPETTS-ABBETT-MCCARTHY-STRATTON ' I _ Philip Perdichizzi, P.E. President :r 4791 BUSINESS PARR BOULEVARD. SUITE ONE - ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 - TELEPHONE (907) 562-2822 r 1. INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH During the past year TAMS has worked closely with the City of Kenai throughout the bluff erosion and river sedimentation studies and the design of interim small boat harbor facilities. To continue to move toward the goal of developing a modern, cost-effective small boat harbor in Kenai, allocation of state funds must be justified. Therefore, we propose to undertake for the City a study to determine the potential demand and the financial feasibility of the project, and to prepare alterna- tive conceptual designs leading to selection of a preferred harbor plan. The proposed study consists of the following major tasks; A. Demand Analysis and Facility Inventory. B. Harbor Functional Requirements. C. Environmental Review. `j D. Formulation of Conceptual Harbor Alternatives. E. Selection of a Preferred Alternative. F. Financial/Benefit Analysis. The study approach will involve close cooperation with state and federal regulatory agencies which will facilitate permit acquisition and funding. We have also found it to be useful to hold public meetings in order to enlist comments and support from local citizens. To this end, we propose an inception meeting during the fourth week of the study to allow those interested to become involved at the outset. As well, another public hearing will be scheduled toward the end of the fourth month to review and critique alternative designs. We will publish working papers following major tasks which will serve as chapters in a draft report, Then, after a five week review period, a final report and executive summary will be prepared which takes into account comments from the public and the Harbor Commission. The following pages describe our proposed study methodology, staffing and scheduling, and estimated cost of services. We are pleased to have the opportunity to submit this proposal and hope to continue our service to the City of Kenai. 2. METHODOLOGY r i � The overall project flow chart, which indicates the timing and interrelationship between tasks, is shown in the accompanying figure. Each of these tasks is discussed in greater detail below. A. Demand Analysis Commercial fishing boats will be the principal users of the proposed small boat harbor facility. Some additional usage by recreational craft may also occur. in order to specify the mix, number and size of slips, separate demand analyses will be undertaken for these two classes of vessels. . The demand for moorage and upland facilities by commercial vessels will be projected using the following three step i process. First, the Cook inlet fishery resource will be examined and likely future developments noted, which will includes • Analysis of historical trends of harvests, landings and kvalue to fishermen. - • Analysis of likely annual harvests in Cook inlet. • Evaluation of the biological state of the resources as --- .--... indicated by optimal yield (OY), maximum sustained yield : and the like. • Evaluation of probable enhancement projects. KENAI SMALL BOAT HARBOR PROJECT FLOW CHART Program Objectives •— --� Demand Analysis and i Fuel Float Sedimentation, Inventory of Regional Tide Grid and ~ Study Facilities i Launch Ramp Improvements i L, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .j L------------- J Harbor Functional Environmental Conceptual Design Requirements Review Alternates' Preliminary Cost Estimates Selection of Financial / Benefit Preferred Analysis Alternative Financial Analysis and Outline Design Report - PART 1 I This step establishes the fishery resource base available to commercial fishermen wishing to moor in Kenai. The next step is to project the number and type of vessels required to harvest and land these fish, achieved by: e analyzing historical trends of fleet size and composi- tion by home port. e assessment of constraints imposed by the limited entry program. e evaluation of likely future vessel trends. This step establishes the details of the moorage market in Cook Inlet. The final step includes projecting the market share likely to be captured by the Kenai Harbor, as indicated by: e proximity to fishery resource ' e proximity to processing equipment e proximity to distribution networks Ie competition from other harbors. Discussions with fishermen and local and state officials and professional judgment will guide our efforts. The end product of this step will be a projection of the number of slips at the Iproposed harbor for each type of vessel in five year incre- ments. Demand for recreational moorage is controlled by the quality and safety of the adjacent waters, slip rates per lineal foot, i proximity to the population base, demographic and income Icharacteristics of the market population and other factors. �- The projected number of recreational users will be established as follows: . First, Cook Inlet recreational boating market trends will be specified by econometrically correlating the growth of recrea- tional vessels with socioeconomic variables in the study area. The demand for wet and dry moorage requirements will be speci- fied by analysis of the existing mix of wet and dry moorage as adjusted for future trends. Next, Kenai's potential market share will be estimated by considering the existing and planned capacity of competing boat harbors, their rate structures, proximity to the population base and the percRived quality of the recreational experience. The end product will be an estimate of recreational vessels likely to require wet or dry moorage in Kenai for each five year period through the turn of the century. B. Harbor Functional Requirements The analysis of functional requirements is necessary to deter- mine the facilities and services needed to accommodate the anticipated fleet. Primary design considerations include minimum operating draft, slip size, number of slips and berth configuration, onshore parking and access, and the provision of support facilities. Such facilities might include: s boat lift system I• fish unloading dock, cargo hoist • ice machine e dockside utilities • oil/bilge water and sanitary waste disposal -) a tidal repair grid • launch ramp .l e fuel float e onshore facilities (restrooms, office building, conces- sions, motor repair shop, net yard, etc.). The review of facility requirements will be based on TAMS' extensive experience in designing boat harbors throughout Alaska as well as comments received during the proposed public hearings to be held in Kenai. The result of the analysis will be a list of the necessary and desirable harbor elements to be included in the preparation of the conceptual design alter- natives. ! C. Environmental Review The development of the proposed harbor site will entail some disruption of the local environment. To ensure that the disturbances are minimized, and to develop a suitable working relationship with the affected regulatory agencies (Corps of Engineers, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, etc.), an environmental analyst will conduct a site inspection and introduce the project to the various state and federal organizations. We have been successful on previous projects in obtaining the necessary permits and approvals in a timely and orderly manner by working closely with interested agencies from the beginning of a project. By identifying potential sources of environmen- tal concern at an early stage of the project the harbor design can be readily modified to minimize the negative impacts. D. Formulation of Conceptual Harbor Alternatives Based on the results of the sedimentation analysis and the definition of functional requirements, several conceptual designs for the harbor will be developed. The alternatives will consider varying basin and berthing configurations, onshore access, and support facilities, to determine the most efficient, attractive and cost-effective harbor plan. A major consideration in planning the harbor will be the evaluation of the harbor entrance channel. Alternatives to be reviewed include: • full tide entry • sedimentation sill (half-tide entry) • lock system Final conclusions from the sediment study, along with a review of the construction and operating costs associated with each alternative, will be used to determine the most appropriate harbor entrance. Sediment deposition will significantly influence the design of the boat basin as well. The study will use the computer model of the river, developed under our existing contract, to analyze various basin configurations and other means of reducing sediment deposition. As the boat harbor will be frozen during the winter, marine f. structures such as piling and floats must be protected against ice damage. Kenai is in a transition zone between the rela- tively ice -free waters of Homer and the significant icing problems of the Anchorage area. Some local installations have had no major ice problems, while others have suffered damage. _ Typical concerns include ice -induced stresses on cross -bracing and timber piles, as well as ice buildup on pilings and dock - . structures. In northern harbors the following systems have been employed to prevent ice damage to marine structures: t r r�_ • removal of floats (and timber piles) each winter a permanent, sheet pile systems t f Recently a number of float manufacturers have suggested 4 that systems using floats designed to be pushed vertically by upwards thermal ice forces may be left in place during the winter months. We will examine this design concept and its relevancy to the proposed harbor. Methods to prevent ice damage will be evaluated for long term reliability, initial cost, annual operating and maintenance expense, and convenience for harbor users. s E. Selection of a Preferred Alternative Criteria involved in the selection process will include but not be limited tos suitability of ground conditions, potential for Iexpansion, cost of site preparation and development, operations ' and maintenance costs, revenue potential, environmental accept- ability, onshore access and conflict with adjacent property i owners. Based on comments received from the Harbor Commission and E members of the community, a preferred harbor plan will be selected. During the second public hearing, the conceptual harbor designs and recommended alternative will be presented. ! Suggestions received at the meeting for modifications or _. additions to that plan will be carefully considered. The completed p plan will then serve as the basis for final design efforts, and will be used to initiate the permit acquisition process. F. Financial/Benefit Analysis ' The boat harbor will be evaluated with regard to its expected financial performance as well as to the additional benefits } r that may accrue to local and state residents as follows: f 1 t fI i I a t' { i {l F First the cash flow from expected revenues and coats will be evaluated. Potential revenue sources include moorage rates, fees, leases and the like. Capital costs will be affected by the source of financing, since the amortization schedule depends upon whether financing comes in whole or in part from grants, revenue bonds, general obligation bonds, or private preferential use agreements. Preferred methods of finance will be recommended. Since operations and maintenance costs are likewise sensitive to organizational structures and contractural agreements, an analysis of cost structures resulting from different regimens will also be undertaken. Several options are possible. The City could choose to own and operate the facility or lease or sell the complete operation or any component (i.e., repair facilities, concessions, etc.). Attention will be given to the manpower, equipment, administrative and other variable costs associated with each type of organization and contract. In addition, harbor configurations will be examined to minimize (� maintenance dredging which is particularly important given �# possible future user charges associated with Corps of Engineers projects. That system which provides the least cost/highest return, has the greatest probability of success and best meets client needs will be recommended. 1 The estimated annual revenue will be compared to annual opera- tion and maintenance expenses and capital cost debt retirement to determine financial feasibility, as indicated by net present : value, internal rate of return and payback period. i r Financial feasibility alone, however, is not always a true i indication of the feasibility or true worth of a project of )� this nature. Therefore, we will also examine additional E economic benefits and costs that may occur as result of con- struction and operation of the harbor facilities, such as: 1r jr • additional employment opportunities • reductions of transportation costs to major distribution networks • reductions of waiting time by fishermen and consequent improved quality of product • provision of safe harbor facilities. In sum, our economic analysis will consider both direct and indirect benefits and costs, and.the related trade offs, that may develop as a result of the construction of the proposed facility. 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATE I Protect Schedule Completion of the study is anticipated by the 25th week after project commencement. This schedule allows a six week review period between presentation of draft and final reports. The work program is illustrated on the following page and includes dates for submittal of reports and public hearings. Cost Estimate The total estimated cost of both the financial and outline design studies is'$1350600. The cost breakdown indicated in the accompanying table includes all professional services, �- travel to and from the project location and out of pocket expenses directly attributable to the work. Task Estimated Cost 1. Demand Analysis and Facility Inventory $18,700 2. Harbor Functional Requirements 8,000 3. Environmental Review 11,000 4. Conceptual Design Alternatives 36,600 5. Preliminary Cost Estimate 81500 6. Pinancial/Benefit Analysis 20,100 7. Analysis of Preferred Alternative 15,400 S. Report Production 17,300 Total Project Cost $135,600 We are able to perform the work either under a lump sum con- tract or on a "cost not to exceed basis" whichever may be more convenient to the City. , KENAI SMALL BOAT HARBOR FINANCIAL AND OUTLINE DESIGN { PROPOSED SCHEDULE WE K TASK I 2 314 516 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25,26127128 Demand Analysis and '' "'" ' ''s" Facility Inventory Harbor Functional Requirements ""`'' O Environmental Review ,;;;� ;,,, :.•, O Conceptual Design 0 Alternatives Preliminary Cost Estimates Financial/Benefit Analysis Kom Analysis of Preferred Alternative Report Production ® .1 •;..: ='t .• Submittals: Q Draft Report 0 Working Paper 0 Final Report A Public Hearing , 1 CHANCE ORDER NO 5 North Kenai Spur Water and Sanitary Sewer This change order by mutual consent of the City of Kenai and Doyle Construction Company modifies the North Kenai Spur Water and Sanitary Sewer Construction Contract dated April 6, 1981 as follows: UE tyd 4r s- ► C3 �Y CITY Cr KENAI ❑ aT/.'�':A��Z. ..e .. _ .. f....... k f OL 1 I 6 r I AMM TRANS•ALASKA ENGINEERING BOX 797 SEWAitD. ALASKA 99864 19071 224.3312 January 25, 1983 City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai AK 99611 RE: Section 36, Water & Sewer Attn: Jack LaShot OUR FILE: 80.122 Dear Jack; This submittal is the closeout change order No. 5 and recommendation for final payment on subject project. Attached spread sheet, exhibit 1, illustrates actual versus estimated line item pay quantities, including the changes resulting from previous change orders. The bottom line actual construction is $1,306.94 less than authorized by contract. Two major points should be noted. First, the contractor has requested a revised measurement on the sewer trench excavation and backf Ill. Original pay requests by the contractor were based on an average depth between manholes. The contractor has recently requested that the measurement be made foot by foot. Both methods are standard and acceptable. The difference between the mea- surement methods would result in an additional $1,570.00 owed the con- tractor if the contractors request is honored. In fact, the contractor has requested an additional $3,389.00. Our calculations justify only $1,570.00. The City is in a position to disallow the $1,570.00 addi- tional, but I feel that the request is not unreasonable. Exhibit 2 illustrates specific line item differences. Second, the City is due a $3,000.00 credit for a lift station signal transmitter which was deleted by mutual agreement of the contractor and City staff. If the City agrees to the pay request, then $11,655.12 is due and payable to the contractor. Very Truly Yours, 6 Dick Lowman, P.E. Principal DL/dl EXHIBIT 1 BID CO#1 CON2 CO#3 COA IA MOB 5,000.00 i 2A CLEAR 14,700.00 3A CLEAR 14,700.00 4A CLEAR 6,800.00 5A DISPOSAL 37,500.00 75,000.00 72,500.00 i8 X/BK 1,880.00 8,600.00 10,536.00 X/BK 30,200.00 33,375.00 I2B 43B X/BK 29,538.00 15,648.00 12,744.00 4B X/BK 500.00 5B F61S" 811dip 8,640.430 6B F&I 10" 55,592.72 75 F6I 12" 166,052.98 98 F41 GV 8" 2,950.00 9B F61 GV 10" 3,825.00 Io8 F41 GV 12" 10,944.00 119 F41 HYD 39,328.00 • 1120 COMPACT 10,270.00 4,950.00 1138 F&I CASING 14,400.00 146 F&I CASING 6,300.00 15B P61 15" CMP 2,160.00 .16B 18" ,CMP 1,866.24 17B 24" CMP 6,477.00 186 SWR ENCASE 1,000.00 I .;198 i R&R ASPHALT 57,420.00 38,550.60 20B SEEDING 9,150.00 21B MOVE PHONE 0 10,000.00 ACTUAL DIFFERENCE 5,000.00 14,700.00 14,700.00 6,800.00 67,270.00 - 5,230.00 11,092.00 + 556.00 36,860.00 + 3,485.00 8,502.00 - 4,242.00 450.00 - 50.00 9,300.00 + 660.00 55,562.50 - 30.22 168,234.88 + 2,181.90 2,950.00 3,825.00 10,032.00 - 912.00 39,328.00 5,402.00 + 452.00 �. 14,400.00 { 6,300.00 2,160.00 t 1,944.00 + 77.76 t 7,275.83 + 798.83 500.00 - 500.00 42,055.20 + 3,504.60 r 9,150.00 i 10,000.00 i f �. DID C01J1 C0#2 CO#3 22B LABOR 0 11,798.53 238 ROAD CONST. 0 ` iC X/BK 2,340.00 2,400.00 2C X/BK 4,750.00 5,900.00 3C X/BK 4,494.00 10,800.00 a4C X/BK 13,601.00 15,498.00 5C X/BK 26,336.00 15,328.00 6C X/BK 14,900.00 12,990.00 7C F&I 8" Dip 1,682.64 8C F&I 10" Dip 6,634.25 9C F&I 16" Dip 223,294.50 10C MH 50,400.00 11C ADDL DEPTH 18,750.00 12C Fai CASING 14,400.00 13C COMPACTION 5,320.00 628.00 14C SEEDING 6,750.00 15C FaI 21" CMP 1,748.80 . 16C ROR ASPH 3,029.40 17C BV SLIDE 400.00 i 18C CONNECT MH 1,000.00 19C SPECIAL MH 2,550.00 20C 161' CL50 SWR 4,835.75 1D FaI LIFT STA 40,000.00 ORIGINAL BIT TQTAL 977,024.53 CHANGE ORDER #1 + 30,000.00 CHANGE ORDER #2 - 2,626.25 CHANGE ORDER #3 - 538.87 CHANCE ORDER #4 NFT CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION r 'TO DATE . CON4 ACTUAL DUIFFERENCE - 11 ,798.53 7, 52,9.15 7,529.15 2,600.00 + 200.00 7,860.00 + 1,960.00 11,130.00 + 330.00 12,670.00 - 2,828.00 14,968.00 - 360.00 13,550.00 + 560.00 2,056.56 + 373.92 8,500.00 + 1,865.75 221,956.02 - 1,338.48 50,400.00 18,450.00 - 300.00 14,400.00 1,106.00 + 478.00 6,750.00 1,748.80 3,029.40 400.00 1,000.00 2,550.00 4,835.75 37,000.00 — 3,000.00 +7,529.15 1,011,388.56 1 /• ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ' NET CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT AT CLOSEOUT C AMOUNT PAID TO DATE E AMOUNT DUE I ... E 1,010,081.62 998,426.50 11,655.12 - 1,306.94 wo" EXHIBIT 2 r, CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 North Kenai Spur Water and Sanitary Sewer Changed Changed Net item ill Description of Item Quantity Quantity Cost Cost Change 1C Trench Excavation & Backfill 0'-10' 1217 LF 65OLF 4868.00i 2600.00 - 2268.00 i 2C Trench Excavation & Backfill 01- 22' 1174 LF 1572LF 5870.00 , 7860.00 + 1990.00 3C Trench Excavation & Backfill 0'-14' 2429 LF 1855LF 14574.00 11 130.00 -3444.00 4C Trench Excavation & Backfill 0'-16' 822 LF 1810LF 5754.00, 12.670.00 +6916.00 5C Trench Excavation & Backfill 0'-18' 2154 LF 1871LF 17232.00 a 14 968.00 -2264.00 6C Trench Excavation & Backfill 0'-20' 1291 LF 1355LF 12910.00 - 13,550.00 + 640.00 Totals 61,208.00 62,778.00 +1,570.00� - i Changed Changed Net Item Description of Item Quantity Quantity Cost Cost dhange r 1D Furnish & Install Sanitary Lump Sum No change 40,000.00 37;000.00 -3,000. Lift Station • M 1 i i i 1 • I CIIANGE ORDER. NO. 5 p'1 North Kenai Spur Water and Sanitary Sewer This change order is as stated in attached letter (including Exhibit 1&2) to the City of Kenai dated January 25, 1983. Waiver of Claims The acceptance of final payment by the contractor constitutes an explicit waiver of all claims which the contractor might assert against the owner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to these presents have modified this con- tract in six (6) counterparts, each of which shall be deamed an original, in the year and day first mentioned above. This modification reflects full and final settlement of any additional work caused by conditions resulting in change order No. 5 as described in the January 25, 1983 letter to the City of Kenai, copy attached. (Seal) ATTESTs City Clerk 0 (Witness) CITY OF KENAI (Owner) By Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager STATE OF 1.70 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this -7; day of 19A a, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally came t'nTlt►ck T. arYlr Prc� and- gU_ 0r*e C A,e , Ce . , known to me and to me known to be the persons whose names appear hereinabove and who executed the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged to me that they signed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein stated. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ....,.__ s A AtAa�cA . ..•�� CNRIBTOPHSA JuKE`L, Lq Mr Commr n "off" >7 Notary"Publibi in and for Sm tf Am/nzi! My commission expires: ;2-7-7k' J CONTRACTOR'S RELEASE. I 1 Pursuant to the.terms of Contract No. 4-046 (n,a,^ gr n_f,_n 1 , for construction of North Kena) Spjir inleCand Sanitary Sewr_r r and in consideration of the sum of 1.010.081.6 ' Dollars (Total of amounts payed and payable) which has been or is to be paid under the said contract to-nyle C.onstruc.tion Company , hereinafter called the Contractor or to its assignees, if any, the Contractor, upon payment of the said sum by the City of Kenai, hereinafter called the Owner, does remise, release, and discharge the Owner, its officers, agents, and employees, of, and from all lia- bilities, obligations, claims, and demands whatsoever under or arising from the said contract except: 1. Specified claims in stated amounts or in estimated amounts where the amounts are not susceptible of exact statement by the Contractor, as follows: NONE If none, so state. The Contractor further agrees that it will comply with all of the provisions of the said contract, including warranty or guarantee provisions as contained in the contract specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the release has been executed this 22nd day of March , 1983 . Contwktor or Corporate name T1T E: Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, on this day personally appeared tjA.1►[ t( t( .s A. t�.L I;K , , known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Contractor's Release, who being duly sworn, did say that i i is the f I,t-L O (oH'm p u i l y-" Company, a corporation, and acknowledged to me that 0z executed said release as N.free act and deed in JI said capacities, and the free act and deed of said corporation, for the purposes stated therein. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this ,),P1 day of (` (IW I t' 19 t., = 1r U: a << ril l i is :�•f 1 Notary Public in and for Alaska ,� �,4AA�- My commission expiress t.►'a•i( jt 1 �� ( [ ` 1 It I WINCE • CORTHEII • BRYSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS r o Ie. 1041 907•2I3-4672 KINA1, AIASKA 99611 Keith Kornelis Director of Public Works City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Zl0,e /*.s.dG'-c T/on% ,em000. CO�/T�AcT March 29, 1983 3 a >7 g3 ^Ic 1 � I + 1 , 1 Subjects 1983 Water,Sewer, and Road Improvements Lawton Drive, Aurora Ave, Kiana Lane, Kaknu Way, Candlelight Drive, Linwood Lane Dear Keiths In accordance with your verbal request, we herewith submit this proposal for full time Inspection Services with regard to the subject project. We propose to provide inspection personnel and testing services for the above construction activities generally in accordance with your standard inspection requirements,exeluding construction surveying and layout. We would, throughout the course of the project work with, and schedule, the surveying firm selected by the City. We propose to provide our services within a single not -to -exceed amount based on the total of actual work awarded to the contractor, as tabulated hereon. SCHEDULE INSPECTION PEE A $106,275 B $4,475 C $6,575 D $10,600 E 010,700 We have based our estimate upon time allowed the Contractor for construction activities. (200 calendar days) We would request that our not to exceed limitations for field inspection also be contained within that period (excluding winter shutdowns). It is our intent to utilize the services of Northern Testlab for testing services, at their prevailing charges, copy enclosed. If you have any questions, please contact our office at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours,/a��3 �..:";•f_�..:;_-;I.~... r_,..1 WINCE-CORTHELL-BRYSON = r• %'f • • " : ` x �� Je Philip W. B�r`y3son, P.E. I -- - — _ . �� . ......_ _ Enclosures Schedule of Rates & Charges, Materials Testing Philip 1M Br/son P I Aloe N Corrholl ► I Fronk W Wins• P I SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING RATE PER HOUR Civil Engineer I 52.00 Civil Engineer II 44.50 Civil Engineer III 40.50 Technician 40.00 Draftsman 25.00 Typist (Reports and specifications Only) 26.00 ' ADDITIONAL CHARGES 1. Automobile milage at the rate of $0.35 per mile traveled. 2. Actual cost of airline, charter, train, bus or cab fare or auto rental. 3. Actual cost of subsistence and lodging. 4. Actual cost of long-distance telephone calls, telegrams, freight and express charges, and postage other than ordinary first-clz:ss. 5. Actual cost of special test, borings, and services for special consultants �- and/or survey services 6. Printing (plan sheets, 24" x 36"), $0.25 per square foot. 7. Printing, specifications, actual cost +10%. S. Printing, mylar reproducible sheets, $3.00 per Square Foot. To the total amount of Items 2 through 5 above, an amount of ten percent (10%) shall be added for administrative and overhead costs. � on 0 0019 927 g0L,007Nn. ae4-.c4 rrirnn CONSULTING ENGINEER r7n-" -02 40a4 Mike .E e April 1, 1983 I '` N�/'r J9 •r Keith Kornelis Nb/jr f+•n�k�G +' Director, Public Works nW City of Kenai :�:• p� Box S80 ' Kenai, Alaska 99669 Subject: Haller Evergreen, 1983 Street Improvements Proposal for Construction Management Keith: In accordance with your recent request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for construction management services. We propose to provide all construction management, inspection, computation of quantities and testing services. We will perform all required services on a time and expense basis in accordance with the City of Kenai standard contract "Project Management, Coordination, and Engineering Inspection Services", and attached fee schedules and Project Fee Summary. We have not included surveying services in this proposal. Our project staff will perform miscellaneous surveying as appropriate to avoid calling out a survey crew for small items. As discussed, we will submit a separate proposal for surveying. We have based our proposal on a project schedule of 200 calendar days, working approximately 50 hours/week. Testing will be performed by Northern Test Lab. Depending on the contractor's schedule and number of crews working, we have allowed back-up inspector time, however, we expect that one inspector will be able to perform most required inspections. The proposal is broken into separate estimated costs for each part of the works Basic Bid, Alternate 1 and Alternate 2. This approach provides a flexible framework for construction administration costs which would depend on the amount of work actually awarded by the City. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. We are available at your convenience to discuss this proposal in detail. JSincerely, Mike Tauriainen MT/dd Attachments Engineer I 15 hours @ 067 $11,005 Engineer II 25 hours @ $57 1,425 secretary 20 hours @ $28 560 Inspector 8 hours @ $42 336 Half size drawings 10 sets @ $25/set 250 Elam Full Time Inspector 158 days x 9 hours/day x $42✓hr 59,724 Backup Inspector if 2 crews, 158 x 1/2 x 9 hours/day x $35/hr 24,885 Project Engineer (Eli) 342 hours @ $57/hour 19,494 Engineer I 11 hours @ $67/hour 7,370 Secretary 100 hours @ $28 2,800 Vehicle 237 days @ $25/day 5,925 Miscellaneous Notebooks, film, etc. 300 mmCim Proctors 3 @ 0265 795 Nash Gradation 12 @ 060 720 Hydrometer 2 @ $130 260 Density Test 20 @ $45 900 2nd Tests 20 @ $35 700 Mobilization 20 @ 030 600 20% Contingency ago ravieLim Engineer I 10 hours @ $65 670 Engineer II 40 hours @ 057 2,280 Inspector 40 hours @ $35 1,400 (Computer) Tech II 50 hours @ $42 2,100 Draftsman 160 hours @ 035 2,100 Secretary 15 hours @ 028 420 Basis Bid Total Fee Not to Exceed Alternate 1 Add Alternate 2 Add S 3,576 120,498 4,770 8,970 137,814 14,600 24,600 d: m P� 009037 fl0"3 PYA.AL1WAAf"1n11 CONSULTING ENGINEER 4007s1{u8-4nae Mike tauriainen.7P-E PE UMIRM FEE SCMMI1LE Effective January 1, 2983 Prafewdowl Principal Engineer 078/hr. Engineer I 67/hr. Engineer II 57/hr- Engineer III 50/hr. Engineer IV 45/hr- Technician I 50/hr. Technician II 42/hr- Technician III 35/hr. Technician IV 27/hr- Draftsman I 35/hr. Draftsman II 27/hr- Secretary I 28/hr. Secretary II 22/hr- Camputer $/hr. Travel in company vehicles at $ .45/mile Field vehicle daily rate 035/day plus 8 .25/mile Job incurred expenses will be billed at 1.1 times the actual ' expenses and include but are not limited tot reproduction subsistence cormercial transportation toll calls materials Unless previous arrangements have been made. all statement amounts are due and payable within 30 days. Outstanding accounts after 30 days from the date of original billing will be charged interest at the rate of 1 1/2% per month and will be retroactive to the date of the original billing. Box 937 SOLOOTNA, ALAS A 99889 (90tLa 62-4624 NUrtnern b Materials and Quality Control Testing FEE SCH®ULE Effective January 1. 1983 Mid Bc&jgm Rdt Eric mil Sieve Analysis ASTM C136 $50.00 Wash Sieve Analysis ASTM C117 60.00 Moisture Content ASTM C566 12.00 Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregate ASIM C127 50.00 Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate ASTM C228 70.00 Combined Sieve & Hydrometer Analysis AS1M D422 130.00 Moisture -Density Relations of Soils (Proctor) ASTM D1557 265.00 Density of Soil in Place ASTM D2167 45.00 Atterberg Limits ASZM D424 75.00 Liquid Limit Only AS3M D423 60.00 Classification of Soils A= D2487 12.00 Percent Fractured Particles (04) Alaska T4 35.00 oft Field Control Tests (Slump. Air. Cast 3 Cylinders) ASTM C31 60.00 Cast Extra Cylinder ASTM C31 15.00 Extra Slump Test ASTM C143 15.00 Extra Air Content AS1M C231 20.00 Compressive Strength of Cylinder ANN C39 22.00 Unit Weight ASRM C138 17.00 Coring On Request Extractionand Gradation AS1M D2172 140.00 Coring and Density On Request Additional tests are available on request- - Mobilization cost per trip is $30. - Minimum charge per field trip is $45. - Standby time in excess of 15 minutes between tests may be charged according to Personnel Fee Schedule- - Field tests farther than 15 miles from the Lab will be charged mileage and travel time according to Personnel Fee Schedule. MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director SUBJECT: Single Audit, FY 82-83 DATE: March 24, 1983 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company has proposed to perform a single audit of the City of Kenai for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1983 for $5,000 (see attached proposal). This is iq,addition to the regular audit fee of $18,700. The FY 82-83 year will be the last of the three years for which we have accepted their regular audit proposal. The single audit is required by the Office of Management and Budget. Essentially, the audit is of federally financed projects. We had this audit performed for the first time last year by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company for a fee of $10,000. Additional work was required last year due to prior year costa on open Capital Projects. In addition, we were the first Municipality in the State to have such an audit performed, so additional time was required in negotiating with the Department of Transportation. The budget for this expense is properly in the 1983-84 fiscal year, and has been included in the budget request for that year which you will be receiving soon. I ask for Council's acceptance of the proposal. RPe-at.,Marw1dcM1tche11&Ca January 3, 1983 Certified Public Accountants Alaska Mutual Bank Building 601 West Sth Avenue. Suite 700 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Mr. Charles A. Brown Finance Director City of Kenai P. 0. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mr. Brown: You have requested that we provide the City of Kenai with an estimate of our fees to perform a single audit as of and for the year ending June 30, 1983 in accordance with the U. S. Office of Management and Budget, Circular A-102, Attachment P. The single audit now required by the U. S. Office of Management and Budget will replace requirements for audits of Federal grants, loan programs and Federal revenue sharing. Accordingly, if the single audit is performed, the City will not be required to incur the cost of separate audits on Federal programs. As you are aware, the single audit concept requires that the City and its auditors reach agreement with a cognizant agency, i.e. the Department of Transportation, as to which specific tests of compliance with grant provisions and which other auditing procedures are to be performed. We have identified all significant compliance features in conjunction with the June 30, 1983 single audit and do not anticipate that the negotiation process will require significant effort on the part of local government personnel or the auditors. However, the amount of time required to reach an agreement is dependent upon U. S. Department of Transportation personnel and hence the audit fee is diffi- cult to estimate. We estimate our fees for performing the single audit for the City's fiscal ,,year_ead ng JUpe 30, 1983, in addition to fees for the regular audit,( will not exceed_ $5,0^04,­) However, because of the uncertainty as to time required to� reach an agreement with the U. S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Inspector General, we suggest at the time such an agreement is reached, we bill the City of Kenai for our services through that date and provide an up- dated fee estimate to -complete the single audit. If the updated estimate Indistes fees of_o�n_ r1 or less than $5,000, bur fees will be adjusted accord- ingl R-at.mamick.MitcheII&Cd Mr. Charles A. Brown Finance Director City of Kenai January 3, 1983 3 Our fee estimate is based on the same degree and quality of assistance from your staff as has been received in the past. You will appreciate that if additional time is required by us which was not contemplated (i.e., special consultation, assistance to your staff or preparation of schedules customarily prepared by your staff), this will be billed separately at our normal rates after having made appropriate billing arrangements in advance for such addi- tional work. For your convenience in confirming the arrangements, we are enclosing a copy of this agreement, which we request you sign and return in the enclosed, self- addressed stamped envelope. Very truly yours, PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL S CO. %GDgz'/04� N. John Schaedler, Partner NJS:BM Enc. 2 (copy to be returned) ACCEPTED BY: Mr. Charles A. Brown, Finance Director Date G-i3 ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE THIS ASSIGNMENT, entered into between ROBERT C. ROTH. of Post Office Box 2939. Kenai, Alaska. hereinafter referred to as the Assignor; and DAN 0. PITTS. of Post Office Box 1916, Soldotna, Alaska, hereinafter referred to as the Asignee. A:signor does hereby assign and transfer all of his interest in the leasehold estate as evidenced by that certain Lease Agreement with the CITY OF KENAI as Lessor, recorded the 29th day of April. 1982, in Book 186 at Page 843 through 867, Kenai Recording District. and covering the following - described real proporty: Lot One (1). Two (2). and Three (3), Block One (1) FBO Subdivision TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same from the date hereof, for and during all of the remainder yet to come of the term of said Lease Agreement. Assignee agrees to comply fully with all the terms and provisions of the Lease, and to hold the Assignor harmless from any liability arising thereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Assignor has hereunto set his hand and seal this /r7 day of ,rt47e , 1983. � r RD ERT C. RO H, Assignor DAN 0. PITTS, Assignee STATE OF ALASKA ) 1 ss. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska. duly commissioned and sworn as such, personally appeared ROBERT C. ROTH, known to me and to me known to be the identical individual named in and who executed the Page One, ASS: , -'?E'IT above and foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this /P r" day of 1983. Ir� /ram rt s . NOTAR PUBLIC FOR ALASKA My Commission Expires: G-2b-C'- STATE OF ALASKA ss. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRIC THIS IS TO CERTIFY that before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly connissioned and sworn as such, personally appeared DAN 0. PITTS. known to me and to me known to be the identical individual named in and who executed the above and foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal. this 'day of 4,Wt1,4 1983. �^ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR ALASKA My Commission Expires: Page Two, ASSIG'NE10 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT The Assignment of Lease entered into between ROBERT C. ROTH, as Assignor; and DAN 0. PITTS, as Assignee, dated the day of 1983, and covering the following - described real i property: i Lot One (1). Two (2). and Three (3). Block One (1) FBO Subdivision Is hereby ACKNOWLEDGED AND APPROVED, the subject to the same terms and conditions as contained in the original Lease above described. This Consent is given by the CITY OF KENAI without waiving any right or action, or releasing the Assignor from any liability or responsibility under the aforementioned Lease, and does not relieve the Assignee from the condition requiring City Approval for any subsequent sublease or assignment. CITY OF KENAI By: WILLIAM J. BRIGHTON City Manager STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ss. THIS IS TO CERTIFY that before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly commsssioned and sworn as such, personally appeared WILLIAM J. BRIGHTON. known to me to be the person who executed the above instrument, and acknowledged that he had the authority to sogn the same, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned .and set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this day of 1983. } i 1 , f NOTARY PUBLIC FOR ALASKA } My ConrAssion Expires: Page Three. ASSIGNMENT Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 853-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA IN- CREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN A NEW CAPITAL PROJECT FUND ENTITLED "WALKER EXTENSION" BY $719000. WHEREAS, a private developer is planning to install water, sewer, and street improvements on Portlock Street from Tern Avenue to Walker Lane in Central Heights Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the City desires to extend Walker Lane to Portlock Street to complete a loop formed by the streets, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is the property owner along the west side of this Walker Lane extension and would benefit by having water, sewer and road access to this property, and WHEREAS, the developer will design and inspect the project, including the portion constructed by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that estimated revenuez and appropriations be increased as followss General Fund ncrease Estimated Revenuess Appropriation of Reserve for Capital Improvements 7 000 Increase Appropriationss Non -Departmental -Transfers out 1 000 Walker Extension Capital Project Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfers from General Fund SZ140go Increase Appropriationss Administration $ 1,000 Construction 70,000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of April, 1983. RONALD A. M LS ON, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: First Readings April 6, 1983 Second Readings April 20, 1983 Effective Dates April 20, 1983 i �I nnonve suav6Vi 09914" iu/Agv10,ON IUA MC SCweR V I / - HAROLD H. GALLIETT, JR, srjaea; Affal"enso Civil. C1481#866n 740 I M991 AIJCHORAOR, ALAOKA 00E00 272,9212 25 March 1983 •'"'r••,..�, 070.9aae 4 Mr. Keith Kornel i s �Y, Director of Public Works City of Kenai j 7 CX Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Installation Agreement, Subdivision Improvements, Central Heights Subdivision - First Addition Dear Mr. Kornelis: Inclosed please find the proposed subdivision installation agreement for Central Heights Subdivision -First Addition. We would like to space fire hydrants 600 feet or less apart, so that no house will be more than 300' from a fire hydrant. This spacing is appropriate for a low -density, residential area, and conforms to what the City has provided on tlalker Lane, for example. We suggest that a special, drop -inlet be constructed on Manhole S601, and that the very limited drainage which will be collected by Walker Lane between about Station 61+00 and 68+00, be carried east and west in shallow, drainage swales across Walker Lane to this drop inlet. The street paving leading to these swales from the north and from the south would have a 1.0 percent downgrade for 40 feet. The drop inlet as proposed would use a special, large -diameter frame and an intake consisting of heavy, bridge grating. The effective opening would be much larger than the ordinary, cast-iron, top -intake drop - inlet. We think this approach would save most of the first cost and future maintenance of two, side -inlet catch basins and two, 120 connecting pipes. i ! I h I Please review our proposed subdivision agreement as soon as possible. Very truly yours, jfvt� �� Harold H. Galliett, Jr., Registered Civil Engineer HG:mg Inclosure: Letter to City Manager dated 24 March 1983 Copies To: T. A. HcKeever E. 0. Springer REPORTS SYRViTs 99510111 SUPIERVIYION HAROW H. GALLIETT, JR. RLOIsTaR[4 CIVIL ENOINSLR 28 March 1983 745 I STRLLT AKCHORAO6,ALASKA 09501 27R.9312 279.3226 Mr. William J. Brighton, City Manager City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Proposed Subdivision Agreement Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith please find a proposed subdivision agreement needed for the development of the Central Heights Subdivision -First Addition. Please review this proposed agreement. I will telephone late this week to ask if we may proceed to obtain the bond and deliver signed copies of the agreement for your signature. Very truly yours,tm�. 4 1 *=U�I) Harold H. Galliett, Jr., Registered Civil Engineer HG:mg H & S Development Company 2024 Loussac Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99503 24 March 1983 Mr. William J. Brighton City Manager City of Kenai Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subject: Installation Agreement, Subdivision Improvements, Central Heights Subdivision - First Addition Dear fir. Brighton: This letter is the proposed agreement between the City of Kenai, Box 580, Kenai, Alaska 99611, Telephone (907) 283-7535, hereinafter called the "City," and M & S Development Company, a partnership of T. A. McKeever and E. D. Stringer, domiciled at 2024 Loussac Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, Telephone (907) 248-1080 or (907) 272-9212, hereinafter called the "Developer;" for the installation by the Developer of subdivision improvements required by the ordinances of the City of Kenai in connection with the development of the Central Heights Subdivision -First Addition, said Central Heights Subdivision - First Addition being hereinafter called the "Subdivision," and such improvements to be installed by the Developer being hereinafter called the "Improvements;" and for the extensions by the City of water, sewer and storm drainage utilities and street improvements southerly along Walker Lane to Portlock Street of the Subdivision, said extensions by the City being hereinafter called the "Extensions." The Improvements shall consist of water and sewer utilities, complete with individual water and sewer services to the Portlock Street frontage of each lot of the Subdivision and fire hydrants; surface storm drainage; street construction and 2-inch x 24-foot, asphalt -concrete, strip paving of Portlock Street from Tern Avenue to Walker Lane, together with pavement removal, street reconstruction and repaving as may be required to make utility connections and installations in Portlock Street at and near Tern. Avenue; and connections to the water utility and street paving of the Extensions; all within the right-of-way of Portlock Street. 1 no The Extensions shall consist of extension of a 6-inch, ductile - iron, waterer southerly along Walker Lane to Station 61+27 and easterly 42 feet to the easterly right-of-way tine of Walker Lane at Portlock Street of the Subdivision; modification of Storm Drain Manhole S601 from a curb -inlet to a special, top -inlet manhole;-"�' removal of existing curved curb and gutter south of about Station 63+45 on Walker Lane and replacement with curb -and -gutter returns tangent to both the remaining curved curbs and gutters and the extended alignment of straight curbs and gutters of Walker La ension f,_.. Z street construction, Ravin , curbs, gutters and a s outherly ' a ong a er Lane to ttat4-dn 1+ and easterly with standard 30-foot radius curb returns to Portlock Street of the Subdivision; construction of a reflectorized, automobile and truck barricade across the entire right-of-way width of Walker Lane at about Station 61+42; and extension of 10-inch, ductile -iron, sanitary sewer southerly along Walker Lane to Station 61+27. 0 The Developer shall make and pay for the Improvements, and the City shall make and pay for the Extensions. In order to coordinate the work and the progress of the Improvements V1 % and the Extensions, the Developer shall employ a professional engineer, registered to practice in the a e o ascT a ann acceptable to the City of Kenai, hereinafter called the "Engineer," who shall design, prepare bidding and contract documents, advertise for separate, competitive -bid, construction contracts for the Improvements and for the Extensions, assist the Developer and the City in awarding construction contracts to the lowest, responsible bidders, inspect the po p construction for conformity with the contract documents, review and J r certify requests by the Contractors for payment, certify completion of construction, prepare as -built plans, obtain Developer, City and rl �t 4 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation approval of proposed Q Oap 0 bidding,contract and as -built documents, and deliver approved as -built N. g documents to the City. wThe Engineer shall be paid 10 percent of the cost of construction w under the construction contracts for the professional engineering Q M services set forth above. The Develo er shall pay -the Engineer monthly b in separate partial payments or t e professional a Weer ng services t set forth above and rendered in connection with the Improvements and % 3 in connection with the Extensions. Partial payments to the Engineer J shall be based on approved percentages of completion of the professional 3 1 engineering services of the Engineer. �. The Developer shall be reimbursed by the City for amounts paid to the Engineer for the professional engineering services rendered in connection with the Extensions. The Improvements s approved by the , unless an ex 2 me for completion .01 In order to guarantee the performance of the obligations of the Developer under this contract and in conformity with the ordinances of the City, the Developer shall deliver to the City, before the execution of this contract by the City. a Performance Bond in an amount equal to 100 percent of the estimated construction cost of the improvements. The performance bond shall be written on the attached form of Performance Bond, hereinafter called the "Bond.". The estimated construction costs of the improvements and of the Extensions are attached hereto and made a part hereof. For and in consideration of the receipt of the Bond and the execution of this Installation Agreement, the City shall approve and execute the final plat of the Central Heights Subdivision -First Addition. If this proposed contract is approved by the City, please sign and enter the date in the spaces provided below and return two, signed copies for our records. Attachments: Bond form Improvements - Estimated Construction Cost By Competitive -Bid, Construction Contract For Construction During 1983 Extensions - Estimated Construction Cost By Competitive -Bid, Construction Contract For Construction During 1983 Proposed Plat of Central Heights Subdivision -First Addition Copies To: T. A. McKeever E. D. Springer Director of Public Works For the Developer M A S Development Company T. "A:��ciCeever, Oate Partner & Attorney -in -fact For E. D. Springer For The City of Kenai Date 3 i -IT, E— PERFORMANCE 13OND if/pC I f two ro oM.), KNOW ALL \11'*N lil' 't'I IIr.SI-r 140"Sl NTS: that Coowca SBT xwor of LON *VA oria a �_ '_._. —' . _ INIm,• of LOnlr•141W�'" IAd•pnN ur GunlraGfOrl a _ hereinafter called Principal, and (C0,00r41'an Pnriners".0 Of Ma-v'duab I:IdmO of SurMYf (Address at Swell) hereinafter called Soren, are held and firml% hound unit) IMame of ownerI (Addle%%of OWr'erl hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of . Dollars, S( 1 in lawful money of the, United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves. successors, and assigns, joint)} and severally. firmly by these presents. TILE CONDITION OF TIIIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the principal entered into a certain contract with the OWNER. dated the day of 1e3 . a copy of which is hereto attached and made it part hereof for the construction of: NOW. T111:RI:FORE, if the Principal shall well. truly and faithfully perform its duties. all the undertakings. covenants. teams, conditions, and agreements of said contract dur- ing the original term thereof, and any extensions thereof which may be. granted by the OWNER. with or without notice to the; Surety and during the one year guaranty period, and if he shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred under such contract, and shall fully indemnify and save, harmless the; OWNER from all costs and damages which it may suffer by reason of failure to do so, and shall reimburse and repay the OWN! all outlay and agpense: which the OWNER may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void: otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTPUCTION OF FEOERALLV ASSISTED WATER AND SEWER PROJECTS D"Ument No. 7 performance 80M. Page t of 2 i PROVIDED, NIJR'1'I IER, Ihal 111e said surely, bw va11111 recisivlsll herehy ,stipulates and agrees that nit change, exh-n0 m (if Iiuut, allecatic►n fir addilifili le) Ihes 1411,11ifs of the con. s tract or to WORK to Ito performed Illoresund►ir or the SPECIFICATIONS accompanying the same shall in any wise affect its obligation fill this BOND. and it duets hetredry wstive notice of any such change, exlensifin (if time, alleralifin or addiliuu lit the forms of file contract or to the WORK for to the 8I11a:INICATION5, f PROVIDED, FURT1111,I4, that no final setttleuuant botween the OWNER and the► CON- TRACTOR shall abridge the right fif any bawficiary hereunder, whose claim may Ito unsatisfied. IN WITNESS W11BRE011, this instrument its execccted in cfiunlerparts, each one of which shall Ito deemed an original, this the —_ _,_ __ day of 1U ATTEST: I+,,nuusi Iwnupsr BeaNNY -� By .— - _ -- al (SEAL) 1WANM N f0 f+inGplll •.�.�-�•�•,... _ - Isdd/eM1 ATTEST: (SEAL ) 0"6189fl Ifalaw risaara/ Offe"*0f0Noefo - fly IAdd/�NI 6LC. �. �L•cj': IRddleNl�' �z NUTI;: pate+, of BOND must net be prior to date of (;fintract, If CONTRAC'IM is Partnership, ail pariners should execute BOND, 1IMP014TANT: Surety companies executing HONDS must appear oil the 'Treasury Ike. partmeni's most current list (Circular :9711 as amended) and he autltc►riied la Irallmom business in the slalr, where the; PROJECT its Ificaled. Documsel N9 f oseamsme 06M ease ? U 2 � ! M1�It{iVl;f11;l�7`i Ftttit�iated Construction CofA 13y Competitive?-10d, Cwtruction Contraest - For Con4tract1on During 1963 Water Utility ` 6" ductile -iron water main 1,143 LF 0 $20AF $22,860 " O gate: valve awmbl ie § VEsch 0 $8100/Fach goo Ago Trenching, 0.8' depth 1,143 LF 0 $8,40AF 9,fi91 i Connection to exioting 6" Cl fitting 1 Each 0 $1,260/Each`fi( 1,260 Connection to exioting fill of main 1 Each 0 $625100 fi26 Special backfill compaction 1,143 LF 0 $2.20/LF M Subtotal, Water Utility —?-folk $37,651 ©� Sewer Utilit y 8" ductile -iron tsewer main 1,048 LF 0 $19/LF $19,912 Pipe inoulation, 2" polyctyrene x 4' blade 1,600 OF 0 $1.85/SF 2,960 Sanitary 9evter manholes, 0-8' depth r 5 Each 0 $2,600/Each 12,500 i Additional depth, sanitary 4evier manhole 6 LF 0 $166/LF 990 `-- - Trenching, 0-81 depth 1,048 LF 0 $9.60/LF 9,956 —� - - Connection to ex i 5t i rso A" AC AAbout 1 Each 0 $950/Cacti 950 Special backfill Coillpa tiorl 1,040 LF 0 $2.20/LF 2,Aw Subtotal, Sewer Utility � f 1 C 1 r i f loidividual Water Services Furnish & In+itall 3/411 Type K Coppor Wire Service 29 Each 0 $1,100/Each IVY $31,900 Special backfill crnnpnrtiorn 600 LF 0 $2, 20/LF � 1.276 Subtotal, Individual Water Servieas 33,1'lli d Ae Individual Sevier ServicQfl Furnish S Inotall 411 DI sewer service 29 Each 9 $6501Each `Dyp fdp/ elf0 Pipo insulation, 2" polyotyreno x 4' wide 1,600 OF 9 $1,116/BF 21960 Special backfill compaction 680 LF 9 $2, 20/LF -JAM, Subtotal, fadividuel Sewer Services Fir Hydrants Ldbaoe fire hydrant 3 Each 9 $3,300/Each sof $9,900 Spacial backfill compaction 39 LF 0 $2,20/LF 06 Guard posts 6 Each ® $285/Each 3S0 ..1 r%Ui Subtotal, Fire flydraiM 40K <EE:> 2 r 4C� f } �I � t i i I � 0 Street Construction Clearing 6 grubbing 1,25 Acres 0 $2,500/Acre $ 31125 Unclassified excavation, removal A `rot disposal, down to sand 40500 CY 0 $2.50/CY 3sV e� ! S 7$ Sand fi 11 ` I?��OI/1�M _,�A;000 3 1,500 CY 0 $4,50/CY4 Ap 0"o06,750 Gravel base 11650 CY 0 $i3,2S/CY q% 9% Remove & dispose of AC pavement 400 SY 0 53,00/SY 11200 Protect existing underground power, gas A telephone utilities 1 Job 0 $2,00e/Job 21000 ✓ Relocate existing electrical distribution near Walker 6 Portlock i Job 0 $10,000/Job ; ¢in�00A Subtotal, Street Construction Street Paves. Level in course 3,420 SY 0 $1,80/5Y AC pavifig, 2" Vw 3,240 SY 0 $7, 60/SY Subtotal, Street Paving3 K i Street Marking R S_,ic ns Street centerline, 4" 1,170 LF @ $2.00AF $2,340 Street sign supports 3 Each @ $100/Each 300 Street name signs 1 Each @ $100/Each 100 Traffic signs 3 Each @ $50/Each 150 Subtotal, Street Marking & Signs Total, Estimated Construction d Cost of Improvements, 1983 5-9/ 113 O I B n ,f I EXTENSIONS Estimated Construction Cost By Competitive -Bid, Construction Contract For Construction During 1983 Water Utility 6" ductile -iron water main 240 LF @ $20/LF 6" gate valve assemblies 61ach @ $800/Each Trenching, 0-8' depth 240 LF @ $8.40/LF Connection to existing 6" CI fitting 1 Each @ $1,250/Each Connection to existing 6" DI main 1 Each @ $625/Each Special backfill compaction 240 LF @ $2.20/LF Subtotal, Water Utility Sewer Utility 10" ductile -iron sewer main 198 LF @ $24/LF Connection to existing manhole 1 Job 0 $1,500/Job Trenching, 0-8' depth 198 LF @ $9.50/LF Pipe insulation 1,584 BF @ $1.85/BF Special backfill compaction 198 LF @ S2.20/LF Subtotal, Sewer Utility 1 I ._ tc: $4,800 1,600 2,016 1,250 625 528 $10,819 � $4 , 752 1.500 1,881 2,930 436 11,499 �^ Modification of Storm Drain ttanhole S601 To A Special, Bridge_ ratiii mop -In et, Storm Dra-i n Manhole Modify Manhole S601 1 Job @ $3,000/Job $3,000 Subtotal, Storm Drain Manhole 5601 C3,000D 4 /< Street Construction Remove & dispose of curved concrete curb & gutter 60 LF @ $4.00/LF $ 240 Excavate, remove & dispose of AC pavement 10 SY @ $5/SY 50 Protect & move existing utilities 1 Job @ $3,000/Job 3,000 Unclassified excavation, removal & disposal, down to sand 1,062 CY @ $2. 50/CY 3� �p 371, Sand fill 354 CY @ $4.50/CY 1,593 Gravel base p p 390 CY @ $8.25/CY Q� J-230I40 Relocate existing electrical distribution near Walker & Portlock 1 Job @ $5,000/Job _52000 Subtotal, Street Construction fir' ED K 9 L- 1,11A, - - --- - -- Street A Sidewalk Pavinq Leveling course S� 922 SY @ $1.80/SY 2 66� AC paving, 2" (Street) e 787 SY 0 $7. 60/SY 'P /o, l0 9� � r5,�9Bi� AC paving, laz (Sidewalk)��__//��,,.. 93 SY @ $7.00/SY /�'d t�`� ba°° �61� �J 7 3Pi Concrete curb 6 gutter ID m00% 422 LF @ $8.50/LF Subtotal, paving Street tlarking, Signs & Barricade Street centerline, 4" 230 LF @ $2.00/LF $ 460 Street sign supports 3 Each @ $100/Each 300 i Street name sign 1 Each @ $100/Each 100 Traffic signs 3 Each @ $50/Each 150 Reflectorized barricade 63 LF @ $50/LF 3,150 Subtotal, Traffic Devices Total, Extensions _$tom, 71 a7o 701340 + *,o %' 73,s 39'6 5A Y 7p, O O 0 C."sr / 0 0 0 4 PON I �J 3 741000 ■..is�i��:,.��N.-.�..�..........,w.._ -- -- _ - - - �,'.- - - �.._ - -- -- - -- -�_..'��...�.,�/;„,;.�_-._,...�=.ems �) k ....i�r V� P ....w:.i: '•,� f•. � : -_.. :..wn ..:.:.rw_ .i" .. ., _ ...-r.•i r' ,+..^.:'i.�'-�'?:M�,..isiw.i:..°�'»'S•�!!�.R:I..i.`'.'.�•i:�:!'�M_Ir�'tG. Ilk t ROW. A wiww• ..•-.^. {••'.:1. is .r .�• �i,. • .r ......— ', 4f.'::......� rrr+�w •4 fri.srMF.Y•.ir..w �' �A. .:::_-^--..-�r-�ir� �-sit:�i:r'� ..�: ..- •w ..r � •r •ram... '•-�M..•7: �-•'. _+rvK.....r':::_".,. „y,.M•rr.•rt+w ^.• •'�r�. -. ....... , -.. .. ..:. , , , wns+'.t".-''.i^•".'. y...+.•.naiY wn.r�ninifi+,td.•.vr..... BATESVILLE CASKET COMPANY, INC. s :►:i§�iA� Highway 46 Batesville, IN 47006 - Rebecca J. Riley . Batesville Lloyd U. Fleddermen Toucan de"nd onus. 812-934.7139/934.7553 CITY OF KENAI MARCH 10,1983 THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE REQUESTS THE AMOUNT OF $5300.00 M BE USED FOR SALARIES ,EQUIPIMENT AND SUPPLIES UNTIL THE PROPOSED 19g3-1984 BEAUTIFICATION .; BUDGET OF $25.000.00 IS APPROVED ITS OBVIOUS THAT JULY WILL BE TOO LATE A DATE TO BEDI: ANY :MAJOR PLANTING, LANDSCAPING AND LITTER REDUCTION EFFORTS. THANK YOU. TIN WISNIEWSKI CHAIRMAN' 3-PERSONS APPROX. $10111 $6.00 PFR HR. FOR 6miics. FROM MAY 14T4 TO JULY 1. $ 4300:00 ' $1,000.00 SEED. FERTILIZER, EZUIPIMENT ECT. " i • SEATTLE CSC Mike Avgeres 206.463.2466 Please call collect when placing an order. .-riU Fo t t preliminary Commitment for Titla h Isurance r.lr' Ile ,►.I' { r_!�J Ity;�1a agent for PICIPMER WATl(li'IAL TITLE INISURAHM CUf,1PANY �� II. •,t"Pop l" i" City of Kenai Box 409 9-29075 Kenai, Alanka 99611 NO Ontn:Attns Dana Pobruary 7, 1983 at 8 s 00 a.m. A ennsa),•9dnd statnm,•Irf Id as Chnt;iny and n(ivarrr,Qs In Con nnction nnh 91110 utddr MI! bo droyidid at efusmy, { 11)wnrrr'n sldnrlmd rnvotdp'+ 1 1 Pureh,t,.1'�iutenrfn^+cnvuraga Atnrnrur, Prrot.••.m 6150 , 00 I 1 Al0rpf.tti44 L++rnd„nl Cuventry9 7,,0 ( f Mottq rQae's ALTA rnvatafiq i XX LITIGATION REPORT Renew tlatinnat T,6v inraualMe Colnperty nlitrnry fi�i}{XlXifiY•if$%.X%iORnStSiY.%Y.Y.StSS%YH.X•rsftY,MiSY.1C3SSSY,K71S630SSLS 7tylslt:tfLkliitx%xft7htX%$�tftiCiti!Y.3::tY.fClSAStY.SKSfYtilfGissGft7tfixStkStS•.ttSEYf%#Y.tiiSY.f4N%StY,f total r.;;, to Ir•e yropm{v duscrrbed herein to vrtuted on lhu date shown abovo in RONALD DOLCHOK, a single man 04blecl only to the ot,,. ,,iron nrrtein anti to till) Pit"% rontLSlun , and aRenptlnns ooniav,vo its iwi 1•, 'A;v loins. This report and commitfnont shall have no force o► elloot e plat r at b F1 cnvorege epec{I{ed heroin) BY Chri�/('J. Koller., noty, DESCRIPTION: 'Dice President U.S. Government Lot Three (3)1 the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/41 the Northweat 1/4, of the Southwent 1/41 411 within Section 1, Township 5 North, Range 11 West, Seward tleridiant EXCEPTING THEREFROM thetfo tracts of land as conveyed by these certain deer) and conveyances listed heroin: (1) Warranty Deed dated October 15, 1960, from Alec Dolchok to Wilma P. Thompson and J.W. Thomp.jon, recorded in Book 17 of Deeds at Page 274, Kenai Racording District, (2) Statutory Warranty Dttntl dated Jun,? 12, 1968, iron Alec Dolchok to Keith L. flutchina and .lanic�s 1. i(utchins;, recorded in Boor. St of Deeds at Payrt 248, Kenai P.ecordir;g District, (3) Statutory Warranty DUrsd Crcatinq Tenancy by the Entirety dated Decesabor 24, 1964, from Alrsc fxPlrsho. to Dottgina L. Colyer and Lava r, Colyctr., recorded in Book 71 of Deeds at Pay,i 44, Krtrfsii Recording District. (4) Warranty freed by thrt Kntire-1.7 Iatcd Junrt 15, 19ti9, from Alec Dolr_hok. to Hoy Van Antw,;r;, ar,rl Ka♦, :Ir•„A Van hntwor-, recorded in book. 56 of Doudo at Paryrt pi, Kenrsl i>esording District. (5) Warranty {,Cr.rJ dated April d9, 1%3, fr•itt A1•'r I)vI'" /. to •r'illiam P. trvi,ia and f;,,rirelth :;trui,!,t, rvi,ss t•r.; i;s Book 51 of Ircad;; nt Pagr; 53, i':tnai P„rr�relitc,i (6) otatutary :•Lrtrjnf y l+,+s•rl duf. "•S '4:Ir .t 11, frr;n Ai!•,s Lolchok, to hr,s llip ul l::oa .I,t I Fi,,r;I cor.'.ri in borer. sr; rat I,•. -•s:; •.t Ns p: 5,4, F"••n,r: ^ot':sr, i Disstr ict. (7) ::irr.y:,ty L•., istr_: .,•:r;,,..t,..+. i. 19,7 to .[,,rrir. ;r•Iil AL ;ricn 'IndBoo? 49 of 'eed3 at ..•�• ,•;, ;i's• :, rc.. ..•s r, Pa•fe Zia, Y!•Adi incgrGar .strict, I •••e••.! y�rrrsr4t�t5.L1•1l�+ril%+d•r,!re;llta 1t� 1r1,1" I,,,l" fn,6 r,,.l., , ,t', (11) fif.al ,lI ttl-% i'i•,t t,l it •/ 11111111 1I'lI I " I ii, 11, l r'if,bN l PI, 196/, I01h) ItIWf bolr'llr,k 01 1lwafit, PniI r,11'I 11 ,/Ir'nr, 1111t,f, rf- nfw I (i In fook,, 4sf ',f In,,•,1t5 dl I"s, 144, {!„nqf Pn^ttr,fin'1 ill n I rl at , (9I PHI# a Ilbf y It,tl„ I Ity I I'll fall t 114 ,lul t„1 fHrytl "rnir'•t' i N, 19L7 I'mirl Altrrf bl'1'fluh lit ,),il, '1'11101.{,C al q1„1 Vll l,we I', 11'11tr141'tfnn, r(sut,rtiv'1 In neNtk 01 let bl'r'dn 'tl, 1'mpt 14/,, iani,tl InTl;ul'tifn') binl.rfut, (10) V1arr,tlif y Infoal it, #feel Prot,irt'1;y tlal.ltg Nrsy /,11, 1967, /.rtdrl l+lrru I0n1 rtirr,V, rr, •lr,Ilk Vil 11 i P,trri naQ drtyrtn td, Nf 11,1 Y,rrrr! Car'leer" In 15uuk 45 Of fAo01n Ill, Pa!pt '0411 Pinaf Pe1•' rtlin') ItinWiff., (11) Vlarru►cIe "trued Ity l.f,'• Gp1.irr,f7 ,lafn'l 14rel/,(i, 1'Jr,'/ from A1nes bolut,!,k let (alarrpt P,rN roan linfl Prann,rn ,1, i'ognraetn, rnn(tralnl In Irb'ik Z, It bnugts 0, pall,' S"07, Filial Pucoralrul bllstrlut, (12) Vlarrrinty bnud it,/ #.fire lintf.r(rGy ]nttlg May /,lr, 19/rh, S're,m Al tia baluhftk #,f, 1',a )arlt* It, IN I I ursssnn ,lag ISnnit i ff If , 7utt"Wirrn, rrmemin4 In Wpk %Q nr INpon at Ptrltr $35, Vernal P.auarding blat=riut, (13) Vlarranty tine] (1afrld ,11117 P), 1969, I'mm /Meru bttlanop to Quierinl .Y,11. inliatdl, rnuu►,'dn 1 In N(tnY, 17 /it; Pallet 104, 941nai P1100rd1sell Writriet, (14) 131.atutser•// VNJrranky bnrfg gate] January l,2, 1�f,/,, firm Meru btelut;nY, trt Viard (', 13haaall.rrr, Jr„ rucurdud in liook 2b of beredts at Pala 332, Ylrat,i 14+111trrttirit; bifsf.rJak, (lop ukatubory V mility belt##{ rr't,►tfn'l '1'vnant^/ by Oaf Mir= data," ,YHly 2, 11fl,, re.few ltltTrs INtlerhni err 114rr7 /tdiS1 r►a ab] 131.0 In 11, Ailk l im, rieuttrebul It, fs(NtY, 40 "t beech at PaTe Me iatl,nl Pnunr1ltt'1 bintrl(rb, (lr,) Vlar.rant7 bent" e;rnatlny 'rnnantfy 1// ►1Nt f3ntlrrrty dated April 10 1964, trim Alum' be,lrlbrok #,ri f4aefiaon ""AA, and ,Yndt E ( hh, rriueJr]b(I In hook ;) etr bnn]n af. Page 298, 9111101 Pefunr,]in1 tif.rst,rftsl , (17) braf;atvey Vlar.ranty lured elafwl fm., nb(tr '$/ Wirt, Cr.,;rrt Alnt; buluhnk I" ygrl f tsten (1nbi,, rnurtr,10 let ts,Ntr. 44 p1 Imadri at WO 42, What. kamordint) blutriut, (10) Warranty title] sielt.erQ Hr,vreraiN+r Isi, 1964, from Aron bulub" " /'hur inn A, ha t l f.a and On t l y M . ha l t i re, rnaur]nel In hwh 30 Of DeRM at Parpt 2 P, Yeaps#1 P,ommltng lifatriot, (19) f5takt0,rjr7 Vlarranty ttev,g gal.,.q ,lunn,ry /19hJ, firers Mew Ilpluhth,, trt lir,aglafs t;(,17rrr a1111 V1.11,1 is, (;n1 ye,r, relf'nrgnq it/ Week /,9 eit tiuert)fs at Vuq,+ °ilJ, Y.teH'l i 1"usttr'lim) Ili of r tort , (20) OVAcit."ry Wismunt,y bt.ng gn►„g {tnr;t•I,rl,t•r St, 1.942, frnfti Abel's llhl(lhVk trt 1,'rrsll,t 11, 'Puylul ,,u'1 13nf,Iny is, '1'Ayktr, moor]nd in hwo Al u, brr„'la err. tuupr 291, Qm; lvltsttrrlln'I niatrft'l,, (21) ,3te,rnf.rrry Ylnr'r"aty la,rr,l 'LIH•u /:n.Jvr:f '/,"S, I'Ir,:; 1►';•+ Aln's bnlei,'ik fit Prue/, /„ 1.1,1'I'll' 4n'1 III1'1'-'1„r'1 A, 3111•pl' rett;,,►]tf'J In IlwA, ',4 of I ...... ts5 ul biutrlut, W) Wrtrr,rttty tu,trrl by f I,,, 1Ss,I i r' f •/ •S•rt "•I 11srr,• treA;, Mw: II,,I'U,�iY, 1.0 'i,t1u i„1 •1 ;; t : ;, h ,f,•i ril,,ri•1 1, .1111.1tlfstu,ts, t,r,;,,r.j„'1 It, 15','h. ',6 •,t ,,, n,t , .,f Y'ala1 I'tre;,,r'Sltl') bi•:frfr;f, (2%) Worrijimy b„n'l I,./ f I,,, Y,111 i 1' r y 'I,te „'t /:,r'Jy':l /7, I p,'), •,,,fmv,�ac r:+frrgry��rrfm"w/a4r{lt,wl) I I ,•'t15/l11#"/A+!lfyf9�►>rF++iNsv. lir+iMq!l�l!'ah1 • �E•. 1,1'PI,;/,+'frill rLPt,l„I• i, , loll! �', luf i „►,,,',' 1'lliln Al„ I"il+'I,fiM If, .1t,r.,•ph W, ji,l i,l i,{,l ruf:/,Idn,l la IL4„Y. 'rli of U,u,dl> oil Vn,p, /.44, rf,u,ll Ih,n„l,lfl„1 ("ifs[ oral., (%4) wal,solot % 4bu►,laf't Ifia„1 lsnul 1i,n,r,y' 111IIfsli",a ,ll14 'Niffltl+,l 11,11 '/, 111 I 1 ft11t,a f of Yl+iyil lividf r"aA f,till"I I1,1 11"Wol11, I"ll"lAt,d 1n" r"rltdi,rh 1,, l,lgf,, fh Isw)k 41 f,f Pmaks it V/iflo, 114, Y.nmll lit wi,l•"1II„) bitsll'I+11, (%'f► VilrIIjoIr ►f%1'ifV'1'(l:If '1'HI;VI;1'1'1/14 nl 1 cif larll"fs hark 1111,- lf!'iftslafl Aanarff,n,l II$ shnf a„rlisih plaf of lltirvity Y-14ri11 HpprUvrrll Jgly !7, O(isf mnl rwif,rfif"I N,Ntnudnrl' 30, 19(19, (%Gj Nnrrnpl.y 111"nl by fist+ Raiirtlt.y 4fili'll Al,l•11 f3, 194'1, froilo Alto! boilifililk I!i Ivd,",11 t', 1"fflup 1111,1 Va#/A V, f: bNlnll, rlifif,rfifill ill ifl,f,'Ili off IP,it,ill ill. I+Nf),t fllf foal Of4, 07) Vlllrrnuiy I"hill fv 41?Vi'y li, Thr,mimf,a nail Ift,r•fil by 'fh+imptsr,h r[ust,l,tbrll 1u Isrn,h /,/, for hungss ,N hrtry+o 244, (2h) Vitir.rilnty liffial to Vrtlnz Villi►fiff, r1r1t10(kid lnnunrI, 26, 19M it) IOWA fsl. fit, Pa%(4 97(,, Y.rllltl) Vrntfir4)n1) bI1)1.rIeft,, (29) VlOrrgnf.% b(1"14 Coo Nnld,tr It, l.Inr;f/rl nw1 r;ny R, hfnrsun, r1aor4afl in lfrink 1.27 0 V/1g10 •[roil, 11I/fial ►IftrrirAfnfl bilsrr.lat,, (30) warrijilfy Wood Of Yrnil'/, h, V l nflfjlf WA 11) 111'r+lili•4 A, Vlt1"11, rrrrtrfl.r1g11 (1111r11n"r I-, VM Is) IOWA 00 /if; Pairs W) f!rfrlfil. V"rftor.9in11 bfJff.rfl/t, (3i1 Tritiss;tsll 1100,4 frf V,lilf ftli,sf.un, riftlarflitfi ha,ilfttf 3U, 197,J, its 1101/k 1,47, Vngil L37, K,Innl Vrl1/yglllnlJ birst:clr/t., WIPTI 14 Y,Y,l:Y,V'1'1171I TIM1<IfYI'IN4 eha fill trio/ifigt 1, A1.1 ,of ffirs 140i40 ,llf f,i,l ri I.lif, bfdundeirloiis of Min Vint, of "Wilt VIMIOff 0AY11, ff0{fbfblfflrlH", If,l, 7ri-sli, Krlsilif Vilfffirditiq bfisf,rlat, %, All. f1f its" If"Ah wit.iiill slit, brwhdi►rlirn rif "IsAIM; flfKVi fNllfl"1'1101011 fill, 1", VI•tif Ilrt, 77-0, Y.i,hisl 1111111"rAihry IIfisfriaf, 3, All r,L ifia Inrtdts 9/11hin flfa f01IM4401140 1tf "011AMiT TVA/7f MJI1 Jf1111,,loll ", Vl/ll, flf", 7(,. i4, Prowl V,amordlilff If 1 Is tr fir, b, V1114T111d! ii ,,1:114IT 1Yl VINIUV"d4 f bAt f.""1 ll"il i uy f 1, '[bolt• pnrffllL" t,( Lsfilff propffrf, 11111,1 ,ills,14to cli11 #01MIAIIrllrts of "1f1 a'lYV IAdllf 1"("hl"'", Yif,itli Vlr,tf"i41u) hissfrPA, 2, That: pfirt I,"f, f,l ss,"fA 1,1a4 iyfh,i (r+,►f,%1 th" ffrrlin,lry- flafffrni bJ,jh11,iltN !!blr% 41 "1Lt•,i,/t!I' f•Irr"li;", Yfr11,11 Viat1"r41liq 111fsfri"fI, 1111104Y/"i' '1'r,s 1-• T4%,49 41111 nS>iJ,fS3SslSJ,af y, if shy, ,till? t:►ifl L,7/.I A') ,l•IS i,,,r i f.y f 1,f1 f r,,if tr1j, T/N'.Ifl'1 Ali lot rI I yt Y+,ani V„rains>,,In I,,,,tit",p, hrJLc ft'fif ftff of I"o, )fi f rrint-wi I;'3l fist fir If•rl1 ft„ll ifta :I n,' ' , :,,,ill "Ill"4pw f1+I bi,l,ffb+' ( III+,f: n,;rfit,% I,,$ q f, t'• ,•'•, f.f, lao Ill !' f s r' JLnt,l (rl'fd'u :3„i: !fy bw%n "„!,',if', ,Ir,ri lL,• rf'li•1 ,,, "41 �,,,r ,",i,r•17 ,fad I r+om wi,1';1, 'n,as:f 1 f it ," rr'►,n,:,• l f •! Pis CIA fill t3a1 f1 1"r-r.i u,• :t 111fC/O in•r 51 ILIptY,/Vn'I"' L "f/ I L s tfrilaf,"rj Ili L I!r f,•"f If j,•r•1 / : ,.' t..'. , I f i,ilr J J,", !a f „/I I .f3 ,i, .,p,,„1 li„:.,,;,�,J,l, li,t .• 1,L,,,, ,r,••,,, ,,i•, 't: :4: •'! 1,1'1'sfSh';fill; FfT(WT y. ,/.f1gy', Ilnlf'hnt, f'•f 1, I fill) 3. An W l Imil f;ur, Le,assfl n1 1 f,fcf.J s1.1 f l„, 1,1, u11 r;1 ts, 11"I ff 111 lsl of nfi, „v6,0Ijtrtft ' I,y Jowl bolim"ifil Ifafr I,nl'f.lfr4 flftfn111 lialm,I, If'r Iflt. I1,II41 nfifl llform Itin t_(arinfs, nnvnnnllfs wO 'wild II.)fair; 1lf.,i"111 Inn4l,lr,,1, tsatnd 1 PI.17 14, 1971 rstursor s Alf,rr W) rlurk bfnswin s flnfrlll I)II I'11ny,nn7 ill' rrllffnrnin .sllfl Ma;ulfsan Mf . i,f/%qL .: �r,.f✓�'•,.•.. .. ,,, .I f�fllbf all{y r'n�r/r4r1� s Mny 2 L, 1971 lsnok/Vn�p+ s 71/4'/,', r•M4r , 'L'rsrrntt s tun lLU) yayrn Affrsatf+ s ftUfrjnrf, prvpurty r A0151 it11414V ' of thrt IMMitnsls f1.rs1r;irmtnt Its unifl }nnrsl, .1 rssn�atnd 4nrnLhun 1l1ni b/ t fs 1In t;nrl,uratlor► TO s tiniflff.f: Lifq,f:fmI ft,ass f,nvnlul,nwnl, A4tud I Al,rlL 10, f979 Pnffordrrfl s distal 21, 1.979 (look/pagil s i44/331 4. A ctlainl o£ linn t.7 this t,miatit nr. Alarskn for tilr, rmlljunt tsriruin fttfltrrd end any other aiwomito dwit, Dnvartmnnt of s Pnvnnfsrt Ayainnt s twnisi4 T. Unlrslsnk. a Amount s 02, Mi. Ur► Most f Oetnbrrr. 14, L902 vilo tin, S. Juily►wint, fnr thn amonnt hornl.n tstutrrd and for an,/ o►.hnr niNiUntn duo undor tllo coeditloria thvrnln. crrAtkor f I-M, 1109111; d/b/11 Midflniryht Craning Onrvica ntys�fr; ,. Dobtor f Pr,n tiol�'hUk Amount s 439, 226. ft7 Datod s ,J,inf- 2, 19111 ' c4unc tin, s 3Y,10-41-210 s:li eourt/Difstriat s stuf,rtrior/ThICIJ ftncordrsd s ,Jfsns, 4, L981 110oP,/Daqu s L7 r /722 Att,grunt' for �:rrstlf,ti�r s Carl A, r,arfson G, Juilfixwrsk for t.bn aeriuslt hlrrrtfn tsl%It1•R . iod fnr fan/ mbar amounts dun ti1ndor this ponditir0110 fJOrrrtlr), Crodttor s Alauka "0A Pf04rsr,11 1:rrffl i t Melon 0101rikor s Prn P1.4 110A Af1ft lint s t 2, 9I L,1sU I,Llus 1n1,1trnar, ftn,l 14hnCryfrss 08"11 s Marr;h 29, 1,97tJ CalJffn tir,, f 77w}/,L7 isiurt/fiistrl.l;t s Df.fsf:Cl.cr,/ThiCd P_csanr4od s Jsmw 9, 1976 aryl Mnrfals 26, L981) tfor/i:/Pft1tg s 126/214 anti 1M/439 s�irlflhll ;paw Att!lrnn7 fnr 4'rn4ft,or s Y,rsrOwLI Y., 1t„r7fsl.) co/gt, Mareh Ll, 19t33 0 Bill Sheffield, Governor k�CFI;/�d DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �6 i83 and PUBLIC FACILITIES C&MILIALAI 4111 AVIATION POUCH 69ag CENTRAL REGION PLANNING & PROGRAMMING ANCHORAGE 99S 2 �TE EX 2g�1851 April 5, 1983 The Honorable Ronald A. Malston Mayor, City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subjects Notice of Request for Public Comments on Proposed Time Zone Changes. Dear Mayor Malstont The Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has been asked to obtain public comments on the proposed changes to the time zones. Written comments are being sought from your community. Comments must be received by April 15, 1983. Your cooperation is requested in informing your community about the opportunity to comment on the proposed time zone changes. Please post the enclosed information packet in a public place. Persons may submit written comments tot TIME ZONE CHANCES Mr. David Ilaugen Deputy Commissioner Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Pouch 6900 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 We regret the limited time available to comment on this matter and would appreciate any assistance you could provide in informing your com- munity's residents of the available information. If you have any questions, please contact Greg Brown at 266-1462. Sincerely, A. Reed Gibby Regional Planning Manage Schmidt Transportation Planner Attachments ARGtRN/dm TIME ZONE. CHANGES Alaska currently has four time zones, which puts its eastern and western reaches hours apart. Governor Sheffield has proposed the unification of Alaska into two time zones. As proposed, the four existing time zones -- Pacific, Yukon, Alaska, and Bering -- would be reduced to two time zones, Yukon and Alaska Standard. In essence, everyone in the State will be affected by the proposed change. The three areas of the State currently in the Pacific, Yukon, and Alaska Standard zones would be placed in the Yukon Time Zone. The area of the State currently in the Bering Time Zone would be shifted to the Alaska Standard Time Zone. The two maps on the attached sheet better show the difference between the existing and proposed time zones. Alaska is the only state that spans four time zones. The time differences between the communities in Alaska create an artificial barrier that impairs efforts to improve communications among the widely scattered population centers of the State. The elimination of the time differential between the State capital and the other centers of finance, trade, and commerce in Alaska would bring State government closer to all the people of the State. The transfer of most of Alaska to the Yukon Standard Time Zone would place most Alaskans on an identical time schedule that would avoid inconvenience to the traveler, the transportation industry, and other commercial enterprises. Governor Sheffield would like to know how you feel you would be affected by the proposed change; whether it would help or hinder your communication with friends, relatives, and business associates. Would the proposed change improve or hinder your trade or travel arrangements? In general, how would your daily living patterns be affected? The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, in cooperation with the Alaska Department of Commerce and Economic Development, has been asked to obtain public comments on this proposed time zone change. The U.S. Department of Transportation is the agency the State would have to petition if it is decided the change is acceptable to the people of the State. Please mail written comments to: Mr. David Haugen Deputy Commissioner Central Region Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Pouch 6900 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 We will keep the hearing record open through April 15, 1983 for your written comments. Any comments received by then will be included in the record. �a MI I -to I I Tim I T Alaska Sean Time E ea� F t s Time Zones _ P=,sent 7 Alaska Stand 6 N-:) 0 Bering Stan and itsTime Coo • OerMnu• 9 and Time ,�, r• Paci is Standard Time W 0 �• IM �J� 8 � 0 Yukon Standard Time e Zones — Proposed 8 Oerwe.Ms 9 Yukon Standard Time a Paci c Standard d' Time A �a•ow +r CITY OF KENAI „Oil ealadal 4 41ad"" F. O. IOX M NOW, ALASKA 99611 M:6/NONN 243 • 7536 April 5, 1983 TO: Council FROM: Janet Whelan City Clerk RE: Appointments -to Commissions and Committees Please note attached memo from me to Mayor Malston. Available for Personnel Arbitration Boards Mrs. Cheryl Carson Richard Freer Art McComsey ram- Mrs. Pat Nault Dale Sandahl y-vA. --U,-t,� Available for Alarm System Committees User of the alarm system. Available for Energy Committees Mrs. Cheryl Carson Dick Freer Art McComsey Mrs. Pat Nault Dale Sandahl Mrs. Shannon Turner jw . - -E I CITY OF KENAI „Oil 6;ard- l 4 414d4a" I. O. BOX NO KENAI. ALAEKA NEI I TEIEPNONE 2E3 • 7El6 March 250 1983 TOs Ron Malston FROM: Janet Whelan RE: Commissions & Committees 1. Personnel Arbitration Board Need one more appointment Confirm: Mike Baxter, Roger Noll 2. Alarm System Committee - Need one more appointment 3. Energy Committee - Need one more appointment 4. Council Standing Committees Need City Operations Chairman Need Public Works appointment 5. Ex-Officio - Council - Nee Recreation Commission appointment 0 t1.6 KENAI PLANNING b ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, March 23, 1963 I Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman 1, ROLL CALL Phil Bryson, Ozzie Osborne, Bob Roth, Hal Smalley, Present: Lee Lewis, Bill Zubeck Absent: Chris Monfor, unexcused 2, PUBLIC HEARING a• Conditional Block Orisinal Kenai Toon Lot '� wnsite, Daniel Hakkinen Mr. Hakkinen introduced his concept to the Commission describing his enterprise as being beneficial to the neighborhood and the commuunity in that the building would be aesthieally Pleasing. originally been'for apartments, however he felt that the location would warrant more people being able to enjoy it. Commissioner Bryson asked if the drainage problem had been addressed, Mr.• Hakkinen stated that the drainage would be taken care of by flow to the street rather than to the bluff to protect the bluff. Chairman Lewis asked how close the building would sit to the bluff, Mr. Hakkinen stated that it would sit 15' from the point where the s• Every precaution would be taken to protect the bluff, bluff breakCommissioner Bryson asked if the bluff was as this is tender area. stablehbelow athe crest, MT bufferefortthedhigherthat ibiuff,and that he felt was a sort nt had been Commdministration, secretary answered tthat en there has been received ' by a he ing Mr. Bo Jehrig came forward too theaarea inequestion andsubjecttfurthertstated was a property owner close t that he had looked at the property for the same purpose a few years d ben to14 that thot was too small ago and that at that time Ua htcems from erosions lHe further stated and that the bluff presents pobl --- that there is a drainage ditch that runs alongside the lot and that the land on the lot is eroding both from the ditch and the normal ng fill eroding from the bluff. la Both he and the City had been p on that lot over a period of years just to keep it stable. Mr. Jehrig i ! i `r F KENAI PLANNING b ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 Page 2 feels that there is room in the city for more than one nice restaurant and will continue with his plans to build one on his lot which is now zoned commercial. Mr. George Bradford caste forward to speak stated that he owns the Kaknu and Seaview Manor and would welcome anything that would upgrade the old town area. ' Mr. Frank Lee stated that when he came to town in May he approached a real estate agent who told him that the property in question at the present time was not zoned for a restaurant and if it was feasible more land would be needed to accomodate the parking. Mr. Lee still plans on establishing a restaurant along with Mr. Jehrig. MOTIONS Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ83-9, Conditional Use Permit for Restaurant -Office space, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. Commissioner Bryson asked for comments from administration, Mr. Labahn stated that the Commission should refer to his memo which outlines the guidelines, explaining that the zone does not permit for outright use but does as a conditional use and that the other consideration would be does this concept meet with the three criteria for a conditional use permit. The parking requirements appear to be satisfied per zoning code and the only additional concern the Commission may want to address Is the drainage problem and consider the submission of a plan or approach to dealing with the drainage particularly in view of this being a bluff lot. The Commission reviewed the surrounding zoning briefly. Commissioner Roth asked as a point of interest how much the proposed project would cost, Mr. Hakkinen stated it would be approximately half million dollars and at a cost like that he would certainly take precautions that the building would not sit precariously on the bluff or be washing away from drainage problems. MOTION AMENDMENTS Commissioner Bryson moved that the proposed use is similar to the existing uses in the zone. The Commission had trouble with the wording, this amendment was changed to read belows "Found that the proposed use is similar to existing uses of zone in question in that there is a mixed commercial and residential" Seconded by Commissioner Roth. Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. W r r PLANNING 6 ZONING COMISSION Page 3 Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 Commissioner Bryson asked Jeff Labahn to help clarify the wording of that amendment, Mr. Labahn asked if the amendment was in response to one of the criteria pertaining to the harmony of the zones and i the intent was to point that out, the answer was yes. In looking at the proposed resolution he felt that the Commission has addressed all the points that they need to address. VOTE ON MAIN MOTION: Motion passed with unanimous roll call vote. 3. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTIONS Commissioner Bryson moved to approve the agenda, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. There were no objections. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 9, 1983 Commissioner Bryson asked that under the vote for PZ83-2 he be shown as abstaining. The minutes were approved unanimously with correction 5. OLD BUSINESS a. U.S. Survey 104 - Oral Report from Jeff Labahn Mr. Labahn stated that there were some questions on the plat and through j research he is able to answer those questions. The first question j dealt with a ROW through the plat. Mr. Labahn found that Old Beaver Loop Road runs through the plat and there is no record that the ROW was ever deleted or changed. Mr. Labahn recommended that the surveyor show the old Beaver Loop xoad on the plat with the proper width and location unless he can verify to the city and borough that is has been properly vacated. Salamatof has formally vacated that old road but not through this property. The second concern was why the plat was before the Commission. The owner wishes to divide land for lease hold interest for long term leases by virtue of a plat. The third question was on the location of the existing buildings. Mr. Labahn has reason to believe the plat is dated and there is one building in the upper left hand corner which is not there plus there is a building on the Daubenspeck property to the south which has a slight encroachment. Commissioner Bryson asked if Mr. Labahn was referring to the house and plant on a previous Daubenspeck plat, Mr. Labahn stated that he did • ri r- KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 4 Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 not do a walkaround look at the property and was not sure. There was further discussion of locations of landmarks on the plat, Mr. Labahn pointed out that the main purpose of the plat was to divide out those improvements from the rest of the property and there should not be a particular problem with it. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to bring PZ83-119 U.S. Survey 104 off the table, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. Mr. Labahn stated that his formal recommendation would be to amend the resolution to require old Beaver Loop Road ROW be indicated as such on the plat unless it can be verified to the city and borough that it has been vacated. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Bryson moved that Old Beaver Loop right-of-way be so designated on the plat unless it can be demonstrated to the city and borough that it has been vacated, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. Commissioner Bryson and Commissioner Smalley asked if the encroachment of buildings need to be addressed and should the surveyor be asked to place them on the plat, Mr. Labahn stated that he could make that an Informal request. VOTE: Both main motion and amendment passed unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-13, Spur Subdivision No. 6 (Replat of Lot 2 Sour Subdivision No. 2, leased by Mr. Ed. Lowry Mr. Labahn introduced the plat explaining that this plat was of city owned lands that is currently under lease by Mr. Lowry who came before the Commission last year and obtained a lease for this lot. The proposal now is to subdivide the lot into four separate lots for the purpose of development. Within the 200 utility easement going through lot 3 and 4 is the sewer and the water line is off the Spur or north of lots 1 and 2. There is a question of getting the utility lines .., KBNAI PLANNING & ZONING COMNLSS10N Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 Page 5 to all lots and there appears to be no one to speak to it. Commissioner Bryson asked about the lease, if the application had been modified to reflect the changes of the lots, Mr. Labahn stated that his lease application describes the development as it was when it came before the Commission a year ago and that if he wishes to change the proposal a lease modification would have to drawn up and come before both the Commission and the Council. If Mr. Lowry intends to place the same building proposals on the subdivided lots, he would not be able to either sublease the lots or sell them according to Howard Hackney. He would need to have utility access to all four lots. Mr. George Bradford was in the audience, however no mention was made by Mr. Lowry of what he proposed to do with the lots or the lease. Commissioner Bryson stated that he would have no problem with the subdivision o:: addressing the water & sewer by easement, however he feels that it would be appropriate to know what is proposed for the facility which is part of the lease. Mr. Labahn stated that approval could be made contingent upon the submittal of a site plan. Commissioner Bryson asked to go on record as not opposing what Mr. Lowry is proposing as long as it is compatible with his lease. MOTION., Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ83-13 as a preliminary plat with the provision that the plat be brought back to the Planning Commission with approval of a site plan. Commissioner Bryson stated that the intent was not to approve a plat should it prove that the proposal is incompatible with the city's desire for the property. Mr. Labahn suggested that the plat could not administratively approve the plat until the Commission's concerns on the site plan be satisfied. Commissioner Smalley stated that he felt uncomfortable with approving the plat before seeing the site plan in that once the plat is out of the Commission's hands it could be too late, once it is approved it is approved. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to table PZ83-13 and that it be brought back at the next reguiarly scheduled meeting and prior to this meeting that the leases be contacted to the degree that he will be bringing in an updated lease showing use and site plan, seconded by Commissioner Roth. Mr. Bradford stated that he was confused and asked for clarification, could not Mr. Lowry simply place his proposed building on the four lots. Commissioner Bryson explained that Mi. Lowry was in effect under contract with the city with specific conditions that are to be conformed to, he KENAI PLANNING S ZONING COMMISSION Page 6 Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 has on file his site plan which the Commission and Council have approved and it appears he wishes to change this. Commissioner Smalley stated that there is no objection with the concept, the Council just needs to know what he is planning to do as far as the lease is concerned. Councilman Wise stated that the lease has to be approved by both the Commission and Council who will address the same questions as with the plat. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously b. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-14, Clifford Subdivision MOTION: Commissioner Osborne moved for adoption of PZ83-14, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. Chairman Lewis stated that there are three buildings on each section of the lot and asked that they be shown. It was pointed out that it was not a requirement, however the city has a prerogative to request that buildings be placed on plats. A question arose over the names of the streets and it was agreed that the surveyor would check on the names. The Commission asked that item 10 be added to the resolution which would read, "any existing structures be shown". MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Bryson moved to add item 10 to PZ83-14, "any existing structures be shown on plat so that no encroachments exist on zoning requirements", seconded by Commissioner Smalley. There were no objections to both motion and amendment. C. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-15, Schurr Subdivision Mr. Labahn pointed out that the plat was done upsidedown with north facing downward. In addition the city would request that Aliak be dedicated to a 50• width and Linwood be dedicated to a 33' width to be consistent with the roadway and utility easement designated by the patent on this particular lot. The second consideration would be the enroachment of the building on that lot. It appears that the building Is a vacant structure with broken windows and junk in the yard. At any rate, this person is in violation of the setback ordinance and also they are witnin the ROW and utility reservation indicated on the State patent and the building would have to be moved. KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 7 Kegular Meeting, March 23, 1983 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Smalley to approve PZ83-15 with correction of negative findings 10 and that East Aliak ROW be dedicated to 50' Linwood Lane ROW be dedicated to 33' in conformance with the.original patent. Commissioner felt that there was no problem with the building in that It had been there for several years. Motion passed unanimously. d. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-16, Basin View Subdivision MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved, seconded by Commissioner Bryson to approve PZ83-16, Basin View Subdivision. Jeff Labahn explained that this is a result of the Dolchok - Kenai land exchange and further that the exchange is on hold due to encumbrances on a portion of the property that is being offered for exchange by Mr. Dolchok and until that question is resolved that plat will not be filed. There is no problem granting preliminary approval but it should definitly be stipulated that it should not be filed prior to problems being cleared. The other two considerations would be to show any existing buildings and to show the boundary of block 5 which is unclear. MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Roth moved that as item 10, this plat not be filed prior to Dolchok - Kenai exchange be approved and also that the plat show any existing buildings, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. The Commission further discussed the plat with the only other question being over the ROW that appears on the plat. The City Engineer has Indicated an agreement for use of the ROW. Motions passed unanimously d-I Preliminary Plat: P283-17, Beachside Estates *This plat left off agenda and added at this point with unanimous consent. MOTION: Commissioner Roth moved to approve PZ83-179 seconded by Commissioner Smalley. L KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 Page 8 A question arose over ROW's shown, the names and locations,(the line shown at the west did not indicate if that was a ROW, second the name Seine Drive/Baleen). Mr. Labahn stated that in light of the fact that they are subdivided under the 40,000 square foot requirement for RR that before the plat is final the city and borough there is a letter in hand from DEC stating that the proposed community water system meets DEC requirements. The code states "public water and sewer" and this is a "community" system with each lot having on site sewer. This question is not being substantiated as to how this is going to be substantiated. MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Bryson moved to amend PZ83-17 that DEC approval to the proposed plat be recieved prior to receiving final approval at the Borough, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. There were no objections Howard Hackney stated that due to what appeared to be a greenstip there would be no access to lots 5 & 6, and also that a 10' easement for the utilities as indicated would not be enough. MOTIONS Commissioner Zubeck moved to table PZ83-17 until the developer could be reached to explain some of the questions. (no second) Motion passed unanimously e. Discussion: Spur Subdivision No. 1, Lot 1 Mr. Labahn stated that it was suggested by the City Manager that the Commission and next week the Council will address this at a work session, and at that time they will assess the possibility of replatting Spur Subdivision No. 1, lots 1 & 2 to accomodate potentially development of residential lots along the west side of Walker Lane. Originally lot 1 was dedicated as a buffer street at 120' for the purpose of acting as a buffer between the residential area along Walker and the potential commercial development of lots 2 & 3 which are city owned. There are limitations and restrictions that need to be looked at. Administration suggested that lot 1 be pushed back into lot 2 by 100 - 120' to allow building lots along the west side of Walker and would involve rezoning and replatted. One of the problems is city sewer and water, the road is paved and curb & gutters are in so that to put in any development those utilities would have to be disturbed plus REA has two underground feeder lines and two above v- KENAI PLANNING & ZONINC COMMISSION Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 Page 9 ground feeder lines, the overhead lines is a 33,000 volt transmission line and it has not been their policy in the past nor does technology allowed a line of that voltage to be buried, this is a major transmission line which services the airport and other parts of the city. The Council is asking for some sort of recommendation or input so that they can deal with this at the work session next Monday. The Commission viewed the plat and discussed the alternatives. It appeared that, according to Commissioner Zubeck, that no development could take place on lot 1 unless and until the power lines could be moved and Commissioner Smalley stated that no building could be allowed so near those power lines. Councilman Wise suggested that the Commission consider how viable the project is compared'to the cost of breaking up the pavement and curbs and the power lines. f. Mr. Steve Cervantes, Kenai Peninsula Borough, Senior Planner Mr. Cervantes expressed his wish for being a resource person for the cities and being available to both commissioners and administration. Mr. Cervantes stated that he had ordered some books for the commissioners that would prove helpful, these books being specifically for planning commissioners. Mr. Cervantes then addressed the comprehensive plan, what it is to other cities and what it is to the City of Kenai. The Title 29 directly addresses the comprehensive plan and Kenai's is in need of updating. Mr. Cervantes asks that the planning commission take a look at the document and if there is a need for change, make suggestions for those changes and use the document as a tool when making planning decisions. The Borough is asking for $50,000 for the communities in the Kenai Peninsula so that all plans can be upgraded. The Borough has spent many hours and has finally come up with a new zoning map for the City of Kenai. The old map was last done in about 1971 and is a rag as is the one formerly hanging in Kenai City Hall. Since that time there has been no officially adopted zoning map so the one presented could be viewed and approved and adopted as the official city map for the city. The Borough is also indexing a history of the subdivisions in the City limits, in other words It will take a subdivision from inception through any new updates or resubdivisions or rezoning. J KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page LO Regular Heating, March 23, 1983 7. PLANNING Work session to be held after regular meeting on Townhouse Ordinances & Sign Codes. S. OTHER BUSINESS a. Citv Council Revort Councilman John Wise reported that the Council approved a resolution to the legislature regarding return of zoning powers to the city, several contracts were awarded for airport projects, the resolution for street name changes within the city was passed and 3 names were submitted to the Borough mayor for consideration for the Borough liaisons. b. Borough Planning Report None until liaison is selected by Borough mayor. C. City Administration Revort Jeff Labahn reported that Commissioner Monfor had voiced concern about the "used car lots" specifically the ones at Beaver Loop and Spur Highway and the cars in close proximity to the Union 76 station on Willow and Spur. The cars at the corner of Willow and Spur have been moved back from the corner by the police department. The lot is zoned commercial so the cars are not in zoning violation. At the corner of Spur and Beaver Loop, that lot is also zoned commercial. Commissioner Smalley asked if those care were not encroaching on the State ROW, Mr. Labahn stated that it would probably so close it would have to be measured. A question was voiced at the last meeting concerning asking surveyors to place buildings on plats, Mr. Labahn states that the Borough is willing to back up the city on locating buildings, however they cannot be required to as it is not written in the code. Since the buildings do not have to be exact and it is not an as -built that is being required, there should be no problem in asking the developers/surveyors to put buildings on plats in approximately locations and it is a protection for both city and borough not to approve encroachments. 9. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SuREDUL0 To BE NEAKD None __ram ..:. =.Y�•� __ _ _ KENAI PLANNING & 'CONING COMISSION Page 11 Regular Meeting, March 23, 1983 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting will be Wednesday, April 13, 1983. Respectfully submitted$ I Tav#t Loper, Pla n ng Secretary t CITY OF KENAI M, ►. O. EOX 660 KENAI, ALA6XA 69611 " 11WHONE Ila • 7696 April 6, 1983 TOs Kenai City Council VMS Kenai Parks & Recreation Commission SUBJECTS Beautification Committee Budget and Tract B Park View Subdivision At the regular meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission on Tuesday April 5. 1983, the Commission discussed two issues, the first brought to the Commission by Mr. Tim Wisniewski, Chairman of the Beautification Committee, Mr. Wisniewski explained that the budget for the Committee will not be available until the fiscal year begins in July which is half way through the summer months when the projects Should begin in early, May to be effective. Finance Director Charles Frown informed Mr. Wisniewski that approximately $5,300 is available for use by the Committee from now until June. The following motion was made by the Commission to support the Beautification Committee's request for that moneys MOTIONS Commissioner Hanson moved to recommend to the Kenai City Council to advance $5,300 to the Beautification Committee to assist in getting summer projects started, seconded by Commission Siebert. Motion passed with unanimous roll call vote. The second issue dealt with the land that been brought to the attention of the Commission by Land Manager Jeff Labahn described above. The following motion was made as a result of that discussions MOTIONS Commissioner Hanson moved to recommend to the Kenai City Council that the Parks & Recreation Commission indicate Tract B Park View Subdivision would be appropriate for construction of the Battered Women's Shelter, seconded by Commissioner Siekawitch. Motion passed with unanimous roil call vote L a i-» - . .TAIAD CITY OF KENAI " Od cap" 4 44w"„ I. O. BOX 660 KI M, MA6KA 99611 MIP04010.9 993 - 76l6 March 219 1983 Ms. Jetret S. Petersen, Secretary Kenai Historical Society, Inc. P. 0. Box 1348 Kensi, Alaska 99611 Dear Jetties In response to your February 89 1983 letter requesting an official written reply to your letter dated November 139 1982, which expressed the decision of the society to terminate as of Jsnuary 1; 1983 your agreement with the City of Kenai to manage acid operate the Fort Kenay Museum and Visitors Center, consider this letter as that official reply to your request. The City Council has accepted the responsibility to operate the Fort Kenay Museum and Visitors Center as per your request. I hasten to apologize to you because it has taken so long to respond, but nevertheless, you will have some record of the transaction on the basis of this letter. The City agrees with the Kenai Historical Society that the museum is a valued asset to the City of Kenai and is entitled to the considered maintenance and operation by the City of Kenai. I agree with your opinion that the establishment of a Museum Commission or Board of Directors would help to promote and ensure the safe and continuous operation of the Fort.Kenay Museum Complex and will make that presentation to We City Council for their consideration. Sincerely, " &A f A Wm. W Bri?Nton - City Manager W38/dg cc: Ms. Roxana Adams, Curator of Field Services Alaska State Museum Pouch FM, Juneau, Alaska 99811 TO: William Brighton, City Manager FROM: Richard Ross, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Annual Report 1982 DATE: March 15, 1983 Attached is the annual report for calendar year 1982 on Police Activities. Incorporated in the report is data on reported criminal offences, arrest activity and traffic activity in the,City of Kenai. Ri aKAL, RAR/lo Police Annual Report - 1982 As reflected on the following pages total overall demands on police services have increased significantly during 1982. During this period citizen initiated requests for services have increased by 17% over those reported for 1981. The serious crime category, the Part 1 crimes, registered a 10% increase during this same period. Part 11 crimes registered a very high 36% increase in 1982. Some of the conditions which effect the value and type of crime that occur, and the total demands on police Service within the City of Kenai are briefly outlined as follows. 1. Density and size of community population and the total area of which it is a part. 2. Composition of the population with reference particularly to age and sex. 3. Stability of the population, including commuters, seasonal and other transient types. 4. Climate, including seasonal weather and natural light conditions. 5. Effective strength and area covered by the police force. 6. Administrative and investigative efficiency of law enforcement and training provided for the police officers. 7. Policies of the prosecuting officials and attitudes and policies of the court and corrections. �1 For purposes of this annual report 1982 activity was compared with the two previous years. Based on projected area growth and the above factors it is anticipated that the trends reflected will continue for the next several years. REQUESTS FOR POLICE SERVICES/INVESTIGATION During 1982 there was a 17% increase in requests for police services that required officer response and/or followup and investigation. These do not include reporting of police initiated traffic and other minor offence contacts that are disposed of at scene. Of the 4038 logged service requests/departmental initiated investigations, 1453, or 36%,were Part I and Part II criminal offence investigations. This is a very high ratio of criminal investigation versus other police service activities. Service Requests/Investigations 1980 1981 1982 3100 3446 4038 PART I OFFENCES Part I crimes are the more serious crimes dealt with by a police agency. They do not include traffic arrests, vice crimes, and misdemeanor crimes - with the exception of larceny. Each crime.reported in this category represents from several hours to hundreds of man hours of police investigation and court time. Part I crimes represent approximately 10% of the departments total requests for services. However, they represent a very significant investment of the departments available man hours in their investigation and subsequent court proceedings. During 1982 the Part I crime rate increase was 10% over that reflected in 1981 and 18% increase since 1980. Since 1980 the primary area of increase has been in the "Person Crimes" categories of Part I offences. Primarily assaults. This is generally reflective of increasing popu- lations. As property crimes are possibly more reflective of economy this possibly accounts for the lack of apparent trend over this same period. ( See attached table of criminal offences). During 1982 the department resolved a very high 31% of reported Part I offences. This was accounted for because of the high rate of "Person Crimes" (Rape, Robbery, Assault) of which 70% were resolved. The property crimes category (Burglary, Larceny, Motor Vehicle Theft) where witnesses are generally not available had a much lower 21% resolu- tion rate. This corresponds to a statewide average 25% resolution rate for these same crimes and 53% and 22% respectively for the "Person Crimes" and property crimes reported. PART II OFFENCES Part II offences consist of most of the misdemeanor offences and several of the non- violent felony offences. In 1982 this category reflected a 36% increase since 1982. Driving While Intoxicated, was by far the most significant offence increase reported in this category. Total reported offences increased by in excess of 100% in 1982 over 1981. DWI offences now account for 5% of the departments total calls$ 15% of the re- ported criminal activity and 30% of the arrests. Another category of significant in- crease was in the area of reported drug offences, possession and sales. In this category . also the reported offences more than doubled. On the following page is a table showing the criminal offences investigated. The numbers reported do not include those determined to be unfounded or those determined to be civil in nature, although many man hours are often involved before this finding is made. ARRESTS Following the table of criminal offences investigated is a reporting of arrests. In 1982 there was a 49% increase in criminal arrests over 1981. This is a cumulative 105% increase since 1980. Of the 493 non traffic and non warrant arrests in 1982 22€ involved arrests of juveniles. Arrest data is provided as a matter of interest. For many reasons (i.e. one arrest could clear multiple offences, multiple arrests could clear one offence) it cannot be used as a productivity or efficiency measure. They do however contribute to work loading, overall activity, and court time uses of man hours. ,,.. - CRIMINAL. .'Lit SES ('Truffle nut, i.m-Inc1ud) I PART 1 1.980 1981 1982 IWMICIDE 1 0 0 HAPb: 0 1 3 IIOI BLItY 0 1. 3 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 42 50 82 BURGLARY 59 72 71 LARCENY 210 208 220 MOTOR VI:IIICLE TlIEFT 26 33 21 7'U'fA1........... 338 .........365 .........400 PA HT II O'1'Illslt ASSAULTS 8 10 20 ARSON 1 1 1 j VURGERY 5 1.0 11. j VRAUO/ClIE-CKS 29 22 38 } 1"•IBI?'LL1.DIENT 1 2 1 VANDALISM 120 1.43 F 120 WEAPONS 12 35 38 SEX OF1'I?NSE103SCENE CALLS 20 60 52 DRUG ABUSE 30 40 96 t 11l l.'l ABUSE 3 3 4 DRIVING WHILE INTOX1CATI-0) 74 105 214 DISURDGRLY CONDUCT 65 197 194 ;} O'I'I0t MISCELLAIIEMS 49 105 180 ii 1.1411jult LAWN 40 43 84 TOTAl........... 447 ......... 776 .......1053 TOTAL. PART 1 t. 2..... 7ts5 ........1.141 , o.....1453 OF ARRESTS 1980 1981 1982 F ADULT JUVE. TOTAL ADULT JUVE. TOTAL ADULT JUVE. TOTAL RAPS; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ROBBERY 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 AG. ASSAULT 9 2 11 21 1 22 34 1 35 BURGLARY 6 4 10 2 9 11 3 7 10 LARCENY 22 27 49 14 19 33 25 15 40 MV/THEFT 4 0 4 6 3 9 3 1 4 OTHER ASSAULTS 0 0 0 8 0 8 2 0 2 FORGERY 0 0 0 3 1 4 2 1 3 FRAUD 0 0 0 3 0 3 5 0 5 STOLEN PROPERTY 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 i VANDALISM 3 5 8 8 10 18 6 4 10 i WEAPONS 3 0 3 3 0 3 2 0 2 r SEX OFFENSE 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 ; DRUGS 11 11 22 5 14 19 21 14 35 GAMBLING 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 DWI 65 6 71 103 2 105 208 5 213 LIQUOR LAWS 19 24 43 20 24 44 27 49 76 DISORDERLY 8 1 9 22 0 22 35 0 35 OTHER CRIMINAL 9 6 15 17 2 19 13 6 19 i TOTAL ...... 167....... 86...... 253 233.......85......318 387......106......493 � f1 f H&R/RECKLESS/ MEG DRIVING/ TRAFFIC..................23 ...................33 ..................59 ` WARRANTS/FUGITIVES/ i CUSTODY ..................67 ..................115 .................152 TOTAL 1980.....343 TOTAL 1981......471 TOTAL 1982....704 _ t r j TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 1980 1981 1982 .$ CHANGE - Verbal Warnings 1788 2293 2703 + 18 Citations 961 1030 1404 + 36 2749 3323 4107 + 24 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 1980 1981 1982 CHANGE DWI 71 105 213 + 02% Hit & Run, Reckless, Neg 23 33 59 + 79% 94 138 272 + 97% TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED 1980 1981 1982 MVA Investigated 162 190 183 Hit & Run MVA's 53 60 44 Injuries 44 52 64 Fatalities 0 2 0 Economic Damage (vehicles)222,135 338,135 406,278 During 1982 a total of 237 accidents were reported to the Kenai Police Department. Fifty three (53) of these occurred in parking lots, this includes 24 of the reported hit and run accidents. Approximately 23% of th6 accidents reported were not investi- gated by the department. These were minor accidents (total property damage estimated under $1,000), non injury accidents, and accidents where both vehicles left scene prior to contacting police. Ten intersections in Kenai accounted for 71 of the investigated accidents (38% of those investigated). The following intersections were the leading accident inter- sections in Kenai: _. 1980 1961 1982 1. Willow Street and Kenai Spur 13 9 11 2. Bridge Access and Kenai Spur (Katmai) 9 12 10 3. Forest Drive and Kenai Spur 8 7 10 4. Main Street and Kenai Spur 11 12 8 5. Broad Street and Kenai Spur 3 4 7 - 6. Wildwood Drive and Kenai Spur 6 9 5 7. Main Street and Peninsula Street 9 6 4 8. Bridge Access and Beaver Loop 0 3 4 9. Kalifonsky Beach and Bridge Access 1 3 4 10 Walker Lane and Kenai Spur 5 5 3 i Ij i I i{i iiiliiwiii"p•"F" - TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED (continued) Heavy traffic volumes and operator impatience have kept the top four intersections as the high accident areas over the last several years. They will continue to be kept under close review during the next year. As the public becomes more aware of some of the alternative routes paved last fall, it may relieve some of the congest- ion presently experienced at these major intersections. Reconstruction of the inter- section at Bridge Access and the Kenai Spur may also assist in this regard. ON 7 CITY OF KENAI FOR COUNCIL INFORMATION Transfers of Funds under $1,000 under KMC 7.25.020 (a) Date Department Amount From To Explanation .t 3-12-83 Jail $ 75.00 Rep. & Maint. Rentals Rental of carpet cleaning equipment 3-24-83 Clerk 240.00 Off. Supp. Sm. Tools Purchase of table not budgeted 3-24-83 Apt. Admin. 140.00 Misc. Sm. Tools Replace broken desk calculator 3-28-83 Comm. 250.00 Rep. & Maint. Misc. Purchase of uniform for new employee 3-29-83 PW/Streets 999.99 R & M Supp. R & M Provide funds for street sweeping �. 3-30-83 Comm. 250.00 Rep. & Maint. Mach/Equip.Purchase Simplex time clock I H y 1, ur. wrro.r�. COY OF Kt►ai •trw .ua%=.rrr m nr I =7AVFO TBBQfINATI4�4f_LBA29 TOt JOHN STOEHNER and KRISTINE STOEHNER KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS .nat certain Lease by and between the CITY OF KENAI, Lessor, and JOHN STOEHNER AND KRISTINP. STOEHNER, Lennee, dated April 22, 1902, and recorded April 29, 1982, at Miscellaneous Book 186, Page 818, in the Kenai Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, covering the following described coal propertys Lot 9, Block 1, Etolin Subdivision No. 3 Is hereby forever terminated, and notice of such termination has been duly communicated to the Lessee and his assigns of record. The premises above -described were re-entered and possession thereof assumed by the CITY OF KEHAI, on the day of Dig J_e.. _ , 198a. Vg CITY OF KENAI _ By` • -= 4 _41- WIllift.1t. Brig t n City Man gee STATE OF ALASKA ) )se TBIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) TOIS IS TO CERTIPY that on this �= day of , 1982, WILLIAM J. BRIGHTON, City Managec of the City of Kenai, Alaska, being personally known to me or having produced satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before me and acknoQ edged the voluntary and authorized execution of the foregoing Instrument on behalf of said C ty. b� r Notary Public for Alaskq My Commission .. �ti �r�n+w r_sTEn,�yi•+.�'Asscss r-sr,�:s. ,� :.,yea:.-� fr. r.;�iafihuv�usnir�:: M�••sv. 0 af. •now. Cm OF wu+ . 9 0- W .F.w AtAS" W.1 msnr TAIFO COUGE'OL-TOMMLIATIOLM—Lf88B Notice of the foregoing Termination of Lease has been duly received, and consent to ouch Termination is hereby given, and all claims arising out of said Lease are hereby waived. n Stoeh r in dQ 9 stine 8toehner STATE Of ALASKA lea THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this J& day of , 1982, JOHN STOENNER, being personally known to me or bbaviftgg produced satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before as and acknowledged the voluntary execution of the foregoing instrument. otasy PuAic for Alaska my Commission Expires:� STATE OF ALASKA ) )ss THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this jd— day of a.._.�nc , 1902, 9818TIME STOEHNER, being personally known o me or aving produced satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before me and -acknowledged the voluntary execution of the foregoing Instrument. W Notary Public for Alaska my Commission Expires :MdArig .. TERMiHnTiON ce L� Page 2 March 29, 1983 MEMORANDUM S/llF� CITY OF KENAI %Od ea,a" of 4"„ I.O. 60X NO 111"AI. ALASKA 9%11 f arm)"I 969 •7386 TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager 01 FROM: Dana Gerstlauer, Administrative AssistanO REs 1983 Redetermination of Leased Lands Following is a summary of the lands being redetermined for lease rates this year. I have listed both the old value (from the 1978 appraisal) and the current appraised value. OLD NEW LESSEE/LOCATION APPRAISAL APPRAISAL Ackerly do O'Connell Tract B, Kenai Spur Property $1980000 $337,500 B do C Supply Lot 79 Etolin 2nd Addition 33,277 122,067 James Carter Lot 10, Block 2, Fidelgo Sub. 20,262 77,932 *Kimbrell do Diamond Lot 1, Block 4, Gen. Aviation Apron 25,200 38,212 *Tapestry, Ltd. Lot 109 Part 21 Aleyeska Sub. 27,900 69,155 * denotes that the 50% cap provision applies to this lease. /dg o INFO CITY OF KENAI %Od G;dp" 4 4"„ I. O. SOX HO NtNAI. AtAfKA 99611 MIPNONE 203 • 7535 March 21, 1983 Joe Langston & Steve Langston Apache Enterprises, Inc., dba City Cab Co. Box 3722 Kenai, Alaska 99611 REs Request for increase in cab fares t Gentlemen: - J At the request of the Chairman of the Public Vehicles Commissioq, Mr. Jesse Wade, I am sending you copies of the cab fares for the only cities responding, Kodiak and Fairbanks plus the minutes of the meeting for your review. ` It is the wish of Chairman Wade that should you wish to pursue your request that you again initiate contact with the City Clerk's office and the Commission can review your proposal. Sincerely yours, Janet Loper, Secretary Public Vehicles Commission t y1.lFiN r IN --- cc: Chairman Wade Commissioner Wisniewski Commissioner Garnett i City Council p, I f I i t t t' 20330aTa aAT3noax3 van suosaod -H sse0 6 4101aouTS •Touanor s,uemiagsTa vjsvjV aq3 03 uoT3dTaasgns JvaA auo a ao; paTTosua aq Mot no4 'uoT3ngTa3uoo anoA ;0 3dyaaaa uoda •uTvgv not 3luugy •3uam8sT33anpe•pagov338 aq3 03 aeTTwTs jauanor s,uewaagsTA 8nsejv aqa ;o sanssT aagma3deS pub gojuW aqa uT pagsTtgnd aq IMA 29TT 3sgy •saa3aoddno van ;o aaganu SuTMoaS aga oa pappu aq TTTM 3unOme uoT3ngTa3uo2 anof. gain ameu anox -no4 -)luug3 --- van aq3 ;o sdnoa3 3uT3on pus saagmem TenpTATpuT aqy •sanssT SoTaagsT; apTMa3e3s uo 3uoa; pa3Tun a 3uasead ueo Aog3 3ey3 os saT3Tunmmoo SuTgsT; aq3 o3 Aaessaoau uoT3e3uasa2daa pue mnao; aqa opTeoad o3 anuT3uoo ueo ban aqa 'sano6 s8 sans saT37unmmoo SuTgsT; moa; 3aoddne g3TM •uoT3ngTa3uoo a van puss uagj •91voil 3uasald sluoT3ezTueBao aqa m9Te9a pue van aqa ;o s3uamgsTTdm000s 39ed TTe301 oa 3u8mom 8 a*483 asvOIJ •sn ;o Tje ao; luamuoa -Tnua v1souooa AgiTeaq a sueam L13snpuT SuTgsT; Agzluaq a lAx3snpuT 3sasaeT puoose 9,a3e3s ano sy •jjan su not 83T;auaq A13aaaTp uamaagsT; apTnoad am aaTnlas aq3 3eg3 Auap 3ouuea nob 'anssT ue uo uoT3Tsod van aq3 g3Tn paalBssTp ttior. uagot somT3 useq an8q Aum aaag3 aTTgLi •3uam3Tmmoa TeTaueuT; 3eaas a pue s41oA Su;mnsuoo amT3 amos aejonuT. o3 SuTog ale s3oarold aq3 leas ueo no4 sv •e3ep SuT303taem ;0 3uomdojanap (S pue :s9nT3euaa3je SuT394a8m pue SuTssaaoad ;o aoT3omosd pus goseaaaA (q !meaSoad neoT 31m=ad aq3 ;o 2uTzn3anx3sas (£ :uoT3aaTToa e3ep pus goasasea se;iagsT; Suypuedxa (Z ;seas gSTq aq3 uo suoT3daa1a3uT aomtes (T :apnjouT aeT; asagy •,(3TTTge go3eo pus $uTKem-.Cauom s,uemlagsT; gaea 3oa;;e f.T3oaayp pus paejoeuT amooaq ueo van aq3 azagA seale majgoad so(em aeT; pay;T3u9pT paeog van aqa aeog sTgy •spuaTs; Pus ssagmamAsio •uamaagsT; 93T sapTaoad ygn aq3 saaynlas aag3o aq3 pus 'uoTssas aaTUTSTSaT 3xau aq3 uT do SuTmoo aq TTyA 3eg3 sonssy aq3 panaTeaa &T3u323a sl03a91yQ 3o paeog s,eXsejy ;o uamsagsTa pa3Tua aq3 ozook ;o amy3 sTg3 Tenon sT sy :uamaagsTA aq3 ;o puaTag 189Q 11966 BIseTV 'Teuag OSS XeS •0 •d TTounon AM Teuag £861 'gDJVN <� ozsaes Los tom vAmv 'nv3Nnr 1S NnxNvtld Minos Lot 30Idd0 9 SS3tl00v ONnivw i VNSd"ld :1O N3 VYU3 HSI=l 03.LI Nn �N! joloajlp emnoex3 suos,ed -W 9900 f. I Cass M. Parsons Executive Director I NFO UNITED FISHERMEN OF ALASKA MAILING ADDRESS 8 OFFICE 197 SOUTH FRANKLIN ST. JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 907 586.2820 March, 1983 Kenai City Council P. O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Friend of the Fishermen: As is usual this time of year, the United Fishermen of Alaska's Board of Directors recently reviewed the issues that will be coming up in the next legislative session, and the other services the UFA provides its fishermen, crewmembers and friends. This year the UFA Board identified five major problem areas where the UFA can become involved and directly affect each fisherman's money -making and catch ability. These five include: 1) salmon Interceptions on the high seas; 2) expanding fisheries research and data collection; 3) restructuring of the permit loan program; 4) research and promotion of processing and marketing alternatives; and 5) development of marketing data. As you can see, the projects are going to involve some time consuming work and a great financial commitment. While there may have been times when you disagreed with the UFA position on an issue, you cannot deny that the service we provide fishermen directly benefits you as well. As our state's second largest industry, a healthy fishing industry means a healthy economic envi- ronment for all of us. Please take a moment to recall past accomplishments of the UFA and review the organizationts present goals. Then send UFA a contribution. With support from fishing communities such as yours, the UFA can continue to provide the forum and representation necessary to the fishing communities so that they can present a united front on statewide fisheries issues. The individual members and voting groups of the UFA --- thank you. Your name with your contribution amount will be added to the growing number of UFA supporters: That list will be published in the March and September issues of the Alaska Fisherman's Journal similar to the attached. advertisement. Thank you again. Upon receipt of your contribution, you will be enrolled for a one year subscription to the Alaska Fisherman's Journal. Sincerely, L c.• •J� t C �•.P►..'1 Cass M. Parsons 9, etv r, ,p UFA Executive Director c*'O�•"-"•7 Fr*lmendsthb..L .mIs rmen The United Fishermen of Alaska would like to salute the businesses and individuals who contributed to the activities of Alaska's leading advocate for ' commercial fishermen during the UFA's 1981-82 membership year. They helped support the UFA to ensure that you had someone to. speak out in your behalf; they deserve your support . and business during the coming year. Contributions of $300 Contributions of $75 Tony McDonald Alasko.Commerclal Fishing and Agriculture Bonk • Alaska Airlines, Inc. Robert E. Allen, Cheno Fisheries, Inc. Joseph A. Mead Contributions of $200 r. • ' Marlin B. Andersen -Arctic Sea, Inc.. Sam Meyers Bob Moss, Moss Brothers Seafood, Inc. Comono Crul;ers, Inc. Chlsum Flying Service • Big Three llncoln, Aloska, Inc. Munz Northern Airlines, Inc. NC Machinery Contributions of $100 Michael C. Berlilch Cascade Machinery & Electric Nichols Bros, Boot Builders, Inc. Alaska Power Services, Inc.' Chevron U.S.A., Inc: Anne CAllgon Joy Noel E.C. Phillips lk.Sons, Inc. Atasko Ship Brokers John S. Constantine Daniel, Hewko & SChamber, CPA. Gene Souse & Company Stephan B. Sawyer Cook Inlet Aviation, Inc. Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc. Clifford L Davidson Sieve Duggan SHANN•SEET, Inc. HOF Propeller Company Ingraham 011 Co., Inc. Aaron Evich R. Barry Fisher Jeff Stephan , Tacoma Morino Supply, Inc, National Bank of Alasko Red 6 Don's Propeller & Welding Fqulds, Inc. Hansen Boat Company Christina Topley Trons•PocIfIc Trading, Inc. , Reluctant Fisherman Motol Sheryl Hastings Valdez Fisheries Development Association, Inc. W 1 C t Pr elter•Servlce -Hough Marine & Machine Cathy Hueslls es oos op Wischer Enterprises - • Jercran, Inc. Michael Johnson ' Contributions of $50 ' Ketchlkon Marine & Supply Perry Coburn Kenneth McHugh Marco Seattle Contributions. of •$25 Friends of the Fishermen al Works, Char Buifln �Cc, s he1H. Inc. They deserve.your supportl Joseph Thompson Sony Taylor i 0 INFO Tuesday, March 22, 1983 2:00 - 4:00 p.m. Teleconference, Soldotne Testimony on SB 154 After sitting here and listening to this testimony for approximately 2 hours, it appears to me that there are two groups of people testifying. One is a group of municipal officials, either elected councilmen or appointed officials on one side and on the other side, individuals and/or union representatives from business agents, organizers or presidents of unions. I think one of the tremendous differences between those testifying is 1) the first group is representing a constituency and they are representing that constituency on the basis that they either were elected or appointed by elected officials and their testimony and concern appears to be about what their interpretation of their constituencies wishes are. They're not expressing their own personal opinion, they are expressing the opinion they feel their constituency wants them to express. 2) the individuals who are testifying for themselves or who are union representatives are testifying for themselves, for their own personal interest without necessarily any concern for the good of the public. As an example, a union's basic responsibility, perhaps even its sole responsibility, is to represent the best interests of their membership and that is without concern for the population at large. The elected and appointed officials appear not to be representing their personal interests, but the interests of their constituency as they perceive the opinion of that constituency. There is a great deal of difference between serving these two interests. I've heard several times during this testimony from individuals who refer to themselves as second-class citizens because they do not belong to a union and have not had the ability to negotiate with their employer. Well, I can only say to them, they have finally joined the majority of the work force in the state of Alaska. Less than 20% of the labor force in the state of Alaska are union members, so if 800 of us are second- class citizens, then I guess we have lots of company. I think one of the single -most important aspects of SB 154 is that the sponsors and promoters of the bill have apparently convinced some the people that their rights have been infringed upon because they don't have the right to join a union, nor do they have the right to negotiate a contract. There is nothing further from the truth. There is nothing in existing law in the state of Alaska that says an individual cannot join a union There is nothing in the law in the state of Alaska as it exists today that says they cannot collectively bargain with their employer. 1 �sJ The real crux of this bill is that the labor unions want the state of Alaska through legislation to give them a red carpet to swing wide the doors and under the color of law approach all unorganized municipal employees to wholesale take them into the union to then demand that the municipalities must negotiate with their employee's representative regardless of what union it is and force that municipality to negotiate. Negotiation is exchanging free will and a meeting of the minds insofar as employer -employee relationships are concerned. That situation is permitted now under existing law and we don't need to pass SB 154 to force meetings of the minds, to force collective bargaining, to force negotiations. The unions are wanting to operate under forced law without exerting any effort on their part to take in all of the unorganized individuals to increase their membership roles, to increase their campaign coffers under the guise of P.A.C. groups (Political Action Committees) to wield more political muscle and more political influence than they can presently wield. The unions today, without SB 154 have the right and the ability to take employees of municipalities into their membership. They also have a right to attempt to collectively bargain with municipalities. That's going to be a lot of work without SB 154 and they don't want to get off their duffs and do the work that's necessary in order to accomplish what they are trying to accomplish in one fell swoop by one single piece of legislation. One of the reasons it is difficult to collectively bargain locally is because the elected officials are convinced that their constituencies are opposed to collective bargaining and therefore resist being put into that situation. It is for these very reasons that the City Council in the City of Kenai is opposed to SS 154 and urges the Legislature to defeat that measure on the basis they are convinced that it is special interest legislation designed for personal individual gain in direct conflict and/or opposition to the health and welfare of the state of Alaska. If the unions want to negotiate with municipal officials, what they first of all have to do is change the attitude of the constituencies of local government and that's goinq to take a lot of work on their part. They may have to spend some money and may have to spend a lot of hours in order to do it. The road is open to organized labor under existing law to organize the unorganized. The real problem is that it is going to take a lot of work on their part and therefore the necessity or the reason for them going to the legislature and asking them to pass legislation that will force upon the constituency what the unions' went. CONSULTINGENGINEERSWm. J Nelson& Associates STRUCTURAL/CIVIL P.O. BOX 4625 KENAI, ALASKA 99511 SUITE 115 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 907 283- 5S3 p ! March 31, 1983 Co.fv �a� �/9 yoo, 00 �J /rIf 081 < 2, -Z o% 97 % Keith Kornelis, Director Department of Public Works City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 —�— Kenai, Alaska 99611 Re: #8304 - Mommsen Subdivision - First and Second Street improvements STATEMENT Professional Services March 1-31, 1983 Engineer 77 hours @ $60.00%hr. _ 0#1 Draftsperson 161.5 hrs @ $30.00/hr. Balance Due Alf, 4* 7 /or, N90 oe. Ao 9f` i ! - APP00vm OY arr o? wai OPU UL Cxoy To 04,620.00 4,845.00 $9,465.00 �i y •• V.IL i .a.y 7 � S ON- TIPPETTS -ABBETT -Mc CARTHY= STR A PROF88St0NAL CORF ORMOIN ,'� ehan s 1. Il1,W 1903 4 ck Publlul; City of Kenai Post Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attentions Mr. William Brighton City Manager M r CY CITY C I'.' f • , March 11, 1983 Invoice 144-4 Engineering Services - Design of Small Boat Harbor Facilities - Per Agreement dated September 14, 1982. EMBER 1982 Technical Salaries Name Discipline Hours Rate Cost R. Fenton Civil 63 15.966 p� 1,005.86 M. Horton Proj. Mgr. 8.5 20.117 171.00 M. Raymond Civil 56 17.562 983.47 E. Lopez Structural 144 17.882 2,575.01 �• K. Warren Drafter 104.5 11.496 1,201.33 Salaries $5,936.67 1000, Overhead @ 30% 1,781.00 Payroll 7,717.67 A, Multiplier @ 2.45/ 18,908.29 $18,908.29 Expensess Travel: R. Fenton, Trip to / Anch-Kenai, 12-6/10 $884.12 M. Horton, Trip to / Kenai, 11/17 61.80 M. Raymond, Trip to Kenai, 12-8 99.65 / Phone 38.90 Printing 41.44 4791 BUSINESS PARE BOULEVARD. SUITE ONE ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503 • TELEPHONE (907) 562-2822 TAM S Mr. William Brighton - 2 - Invoice 144-4 carried forward $18,908.29 Expenses (continued) Publication 5.00 Secretary Services 12.64 $1,143.55 Service Charge @ 10$/ 114.36 $1,257.91 $ 1,257.91 Total This Invoice . . . . . . $20,166.20 TIPPETTS-ABBETT-McCARTHY-STRATTON A Professional Corporation ORMINAL COPY TO Attachment - Summary L-I'Ll - - - ---- - --- - i SUMMARY OF ACCOUNT Design of Small Boat Harbor Facilities Kenai, Alaska • Invoice 144-4 Periods December 1982 1 i Total Allowable Previous Total Total Remaining Compensation Billings This Month To Date Amount $830150.00 '000, $32,909.72 -"0' 020,166.20 0-' $53,074.92 $30,075.08 ,er r rA NIS IN'F TIPPETTS-AFaETT - Mc CARTHY. ,STRATTON A PROWS MONAL CORAOAATMON _ MCI,YUM fl City of Kenai �C Post Office Box 580 4G% BY CITY AOMINIRTRATION Kenai, Alaska 99611 �•� �7ti L CITY V I Attentions Mr. William Brighton March 21, 1983 City Manager Invoice 144-5 Engineering Services - Design of Small Boat Harbor Facilities - Per Agreement dated September 14, 1982. �Jt1ARY 1983 Technical Salaries Name Discipline Hours Rate Cost PIK R. Fenton Civil 18.5 16.000 296.00 � M. Horton Proj. Mgr. 8 20.160 161.28 � C. Jenkins Word Processor 1 9.120 9.12 M. Mercier Drafter 20 9.152 183.04,** H. Vu Drafter 9 9.152 82.37 -1 K. Warren Drafter 108 11.520 1,244.16 E. Lopez Structural 148.5 17.920 2*661.12 M. Raymond Civil 52.5 17.600 924.00 -0 G. Schneider Anch. Mgr. 6 19.84 119.04 -- Salaries 5,680.13tY Overhead @ 30% 1,704.04 � Payroll 7, 384. 77 Multiplier @ 2.45 / 18,091.22 $18,091.22 Expenses Printing 60.00 Phone 10.61 J Field Equipment 60.32 Travels M. Raymond, 1/19 trip to Kenai 123.77 ✓ E. Lopez, 1/19 trip / to Kenai 80.80 ✓ .J 4791 BUSINESS PARK BOULEVARD. SUITE ONE • ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503 - TELEPHONE (907) 562.2822 �oY. 4/9aoo. r ♦ M TAM 5 Mr. William Brighton - 2 - Invoice 144-5 Expenses (continued): G. Schneider, 1/25 trip to Kenai 73.25 I M. Horton, 12/9 trip - � to Anchorage 203.81 612.56 Ar Service Charge @ 10e 61.26 $673.82 $ 673.82 -0' ty Total This Invoice ``$18,765.04 ` TIPPETTS-ABBETT-MaCARTHY-STRATTON A Professional Corporation Attachment - Summary "t i Y MANAGER p�t,eLIC t+1CZS:S...�....�.f�.»._.»... O f:it0�:'•:Ll( .» ' *cjT7 cunt. r...-.»» ».. -- —.--. O '. 0=114AL COPY TO y ,AMA - - --- — i TAMS t SUMMARY OF ACCOUNT Design of Small Boat Harbor Facilities Kenai, Alaska Invoice 144-5 Period: January 1983 Total Allowable Previous Total Total Remaining Compensation Billings This Month To Date Amount $83,150.00 -"' $53,074.92-** $18,765.04 -'0' $71,839.9600' $11,310.04 VX 044 r, Alc :2 v3, y 90 0 0, 9 /A(r 'VIVNI5 TIPPETTS -ABBETT-Mc CARTHY-STRATTON RCCEI'v�l� A PROFESSIO.Y.IL OONWAVON 141983 Ef1CL�.EFJt4 •�'�•� ••'': . a ,�' OY CITY ADMINIfiTRAT10 4101 �9p 9City of 'f al Post OfficeKenai Box 580 rN brr� 6� s Kenai, Alaska 99611 • �,'�•, 1; �� Attentions Mr. William Brighton March 10, 1983 City Manager Invoice 143-6 Engineering Services - Kenai River Sedimentation study - Per Agreement dated May 11, 1982 and letter dated March 1, 1983 from the City of Kenai. Period of Invoices December 1983 Task 1 - Literature and Data Search - $8,982.001-11, 10016 Complete $8,982.00 Less Previous Billings 143-1 & 2 8,982.00 $ 0 Ile Task 2 - Field Investigations - Estimate $68,125.00 .01 r4,i Technical Salaries $0 Expenses s >y6 2� 903. oo Oh Phone 3.27 00" 7-e.j* / ' Service Charge @ 10% .33 t9Q 3.60 Task 3 - Analyzes Operational Characteristics of Alternative Harbor Forms - $8,916.00-,' 70% Complete Less Previous Billings 143-1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 0 $6,241.0000, $ 3.60 5,350.001" 891.00 $ 891.00 rift >'rEVAXrSUITE-acf--XNC[IORACE: ALASKA 99503 • TELEPHONE (9071 562-2822 TAM S City of Kenai _ 2 _ March 10, 1983 Task 4 - Mathematical Modeling of Hydraulic & Sediment Regime, Test Alternative Harbor Forms and Configurations - $22,350.00 70% Complete $15,645.00 -*' Less Previous Billings 143-1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 13,410.00/ 2,235.00 $ 2,235.00 Task 5 - Prepare Report on Remedial Measures to Amerliorate or Eliminate Erosion of Bluff Area - $8.,816.00-o' 90% Complete $7,934.00 � Less Previous Billings 143-1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 7_93344.00/ mod, Task 6 - Final Analysis, Recommendations and Report - $14,203.00 -- 30% Complete $4,261.00 Less Previous Billings 143-4 & 5 2,8, 41.00 of $1,420.00 $ Total This Invoice 40 TIPPETTS-ABBETT-McCARTHY-STRATTOM A Professional Corporation Attachment - Summary of Account GOw/31 394.00 of to datc. < 9b� t7 9, oo > so 72 TAMS SUMMARY Kenai River Sedimentation study Invoice 243-6 Total Total Code Item Budget To Date This Period Task 1 Lit. & Data Search $ 8,982.00 $8,982.00 $ 0 Task 2 Field Investigations 68,125.00 62,906.60 $ 3.60 Task 3 Alternatative Harbor Forms 8,916.00 6,241.00 $ I 891.00 Task 4 Math. Mod., Test & Config. 22,350.00 15,645.00 $ 2,235.00 y f Task 5 Remedial Measures 8,816.00 7,934.00 $ r 0 i 1 Task 6 Final Analysis 14,203.00 4,261.00 $ 1,420.00 ! !� $131,392.00 $105#969.60 $ 4,549.60 r E a i E i e I { I n J A/c 71o. y 9 vo v, kv pr- WINCE • CORTHELL • BRYSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS March 29, 1983 to son loa 907,283.4672 KINAI. ALASKA 82-33 99611 v y o 9 y y City of Kenai iG B Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 1 ! Ll Attentions Keith Kornelis i Subjects Linwood,Candlelight,Lawton 1983 hater, Sewer,and Street Improvements Final Payment Dear Keiths Please consider thi Final invoice for payment of retained portions of amounts earned on the subject project. Amount Due $2575.00 plus in erest) _. Me-o I hereby certify that the above charges are correct and no payment has been 1 received therefor. Very truly yours, WINCE-CORTHELL-BRYSON Wa Philip Bryson, P.E. Philip W lrpgen P t Alan M Corthell P[ /rent W Wine* c 1 "'/, , , w• CITY OF KENAI P. O. BOX 500 • KENAI. ALAI3KA 99611 • PHONE 203.7535 7 TO F DATE t - suBJEO/T� .. _. 4000'Z14 n¢t r 4 His` OAr %r�ir�/ /J.��� T%►e•r . C"Gw fi�`cy� -rC'C. 6, Cerolb .--fr J•s64 p4 v� / �h' % .... sl�Gn a%h ITT yM _14ay', 9-t a-1/-e.j AWd,d tio7g Aer , �/�•,i .%�cf. yT/�dre/fog¢/� f�L✓ �✓AJ _. i+v�_ . _ . fr•wG r0%�'3rhSfG. _.k/iif/ �ywtT ��e�tf J O�f �j4J (r 3✓f%r'k �vS� ..s,�r'.. ye77 -04A, /w�P•dJ/ J TD!e .Qa J�IC� ._.�HO.�r1�J .. ti.i'%�ii�Ll�• -----... .�.�. . DATE 9IONED Fw.fteIIf IDMG—.IttY�.� Toy l:f' •_L.« INYTAYCTIONf T7 St�O[u: .IYSTPVCT:ON/ TO PECCIVCM I. Kte#T[L\OM COOT. S. SLND NNI•t AN* P,%K CCP.Lp W:TM CAGCON I%TAC• �. %QITt ACP:T. S. CC -ACM SfL9. K/LP P.tiK COPT 9t•YAN TiNITT CCPV TO SthOtfL L. Q'APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA 00CUMINT G702 PAGF ON-F (IF 2 TO (Owner): City of Kenai PROJECT: Kenai,Revrewtion Center APPLICATION NO: 5 Oistrrhtilion to; P.O. Box 580 Gympgtium Addition L1 OWNER Kenai, AK 99611 PERIOD FROM: 3/1/83 n ARr.1117Er,T L7 ''! TO: 4/1/83 n CONTRACTOR ` `~ !`ice �:;•' %' ARCHITECT'S (� ATTENTION: CONTRACT FOR si `H sPROIF.CT NO: CONTRACT DATF: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY _ Change Orders approved ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS in previous months by Owner TOTAL . 10721/82 2. 11/4/82 3. 1/4/83 99000.00' 5,516.00- 625,00' npp►rwed Ibis xu nIh Numher Date Approved 4. 1/4/83 2,870.00' 5. 1/31/83 47,975.00' 6. 1/21/83 1,500.00" ' 1,165.4 75,301.00 � *dxAE3 8. 3 4 83 Net change by Chan a Orders The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. --- --- -— :I_ Date BY%',l IPA Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached, The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....... . ........... . . . . 5 699,200 Net change by Change Orders .....................5 75,301 � CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ..................... . . . S 774.8501 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ........... S 385,620 (Column G on G703) RETAINAGE % . ......................5 or total in Column 1 on G703 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. S 385,620 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ....... S Iski /e0) CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......................... S 479020 Z' State of: County of: Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,19 Notary Public - My Commission expires: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ., T AMOUNT CERTIFIED ............................. S (Attach explanation it amount certified differs from the amount applied fnr.l In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -me obser• ARCHITECT: vations and the data comprising The above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, By: Date: the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu• This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contrartor ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without pre,udirn to any CERTIFIED. rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCU G707 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • APRIL 1970 EDITION —AIA@ • 0 1970 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 10006 GM — 1978 ' CONTINUATION SHEET AIA 0000MF.NT C,703 n . M J AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing �� ' ,: r ;; Contractur's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. 48 i-. �! Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply.. r APPLICATION NUMBER: 5 APPLICATION PATE: PERIOD FROM: 3/1/83 TO: 4/1/83 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A 0 C D E f G II i ITEM DESCRIPTION Of WORK SCIIE71UL WORK COMPLETED TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED % BALANCE TO FINISH RETAINAC;E This Application pplication No. VALUE Previous Applications TO DATE ID+E+rI IG': CI IC—Gi Work in Place Stored Materials Inert in D or EI 1 General Requirements 70,000 - 70,000, 0 0 70,000" 100% 0 2 Site Work 75,000- 15,000 - 0 0 15,000' 20% 60,000 3 Concrete 30,000- 10,000- 10,000 - 0 20,000 - 66% 10,000 4 Masonry 201000 - 19,000. 0 0 19,000, 95% 1,000 5 Metals 5,000- 51000- 0 0 5,000, 100% 0 6 Carpentry 120,000 - 72,000, 0 0 72,000, 60% 48,000 7 Thermal & Moisture 30,000' 30,000- 0 0 30,000, 100% 0 8 Doors & Windows 20,000- 2,000 0 0 2,000, 10% 18,000 9 Finishes 32,000- - 0 0 0 0 -�500 0% 32,000 3,500 10 Specialties 7,000 3,500 - 0 0 35,000 50% 11 Equipment 50,000 - 5,000, 0 0 510001, 10% 45,000 15 Mechanical & Plumbing 175,200 87,600- 17,520 ' 0 105,1W 60% 70,080 16 Electrical 65,000 - 19,500, 19,500 - 0 39,000 ' 60% 26,000 17 Change Orders 75,301 - 0 - 0 0 0 0% 75,301 774,5011 338,600� 47,020 385,620 IN 388,881 I11A OOWMENT G703 • CONIINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1976 EDITION • AIAe - O 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, O.C. 200M t f G703 --1 1, / r M/ //VFO , 1st. '# 60., ypope, 8-0gk- _ _..... ►[RIOOIC [ITIMATI FOR PARTIAL PA1114i"I �age sN 6e410+0e0 of passage lerth Ksnsi Spur watur 6 Sanitary Suworr Kun.aL. Alaska ...� /Ie{ se0 aMstff Or ter fnNi0w •�- ... ..-..�. �- �.-...� ..._�. Osyte construction company .. Data / t2tSq GStiRG saeNMtss+,r•rsWe- LO -pas scale, -Juno 29, 198; to March 28, 1983 I. COST OP WOaxCOMPLIT90 TO DATE UMOCR ORIGINAL CONTRACT ONLY 9M0;o muss Lp 16410J Lr sorb &04 ewb 9 Wall" rho nr.a.su1 r.r,ua. r ..IV. • f LrOA aed Nct dNa unJer ahanp of f#tq is to tw thsan ,n 11eN S s1 rho. Cetemee (Ilslrf *$% 411; Falco data dmm" bs ..slum#. 1- 4 1. M Atoll,) rs.Pr.o orlt, up Funs VWIII p""" by C+aussw. Gwmee (61 {ud (7). camplesed to Jars under ori{inal .•aurae. Cdema J$1. ►wet she di/leoeaee besve#a #notice in columns (3) cad ('). Column In ♦Slide penerll ratio Ol column 471 to column (SL ees+saC+ eorsi4+m +o oars eater stepaaeeMrtldl or moor YMCeeK{f{O terra s era+. coat sea te+ar set,#One e.r. Ya.+ 1 .. - too off Nr rn err Ir1 Us rs► Hcotbit:1sstion b Daaobit. ua► $33000. 1880:' 1 5000.000 44 qq ys000.p000 r 121 S 1100 Ciiarcin� :$ ac 1838.'00 4:9aa o 18 444AAA 34 clear ! olsposal of Unsuitable or 4 so :9000 2000. 2.50 6800.00' 72500.00 3.4aa 6800.00 n 26908 67270.00 to is surplus Hateriai Tcaneh Lxeavatioa 6 ey' , 34'- 4.00 10536 ,00 oy. 2773 11092.00 too 2s Saektill (0' 10, TranchkF�vast on��.) t[- 75 5.00 , 33375.00 it 72 36060.0.0 H17 100 �s aennae6h ii sci s4 6.00' 1_2744:00 8502.00 100 49 io'i u'1 • " Trench excavation 4 Sackett it o L[ L0.00 - $00.00 1r 45 19 450.00 . too 'is rttsssn0 blinstall err D.I.P. 5 6 L 15.00 8640.00 t 0 9300.00 '.'0 too 6s Cass 2 v'Appuo atianeed Furn 6 Iasut LO•' o1V _ 1 17.78 55592.72 3125 53562.50 0 too •too 79 clus 52 v/Appurtefm=os furnish b tostall 12" DIP It 7991 20.78 166052.9e t[ 8096 168234.88 0 ss Civa 32 w/Appurtenancos Furnish 6 Install 8" CV 1[ sa $90.00 2950.00' 1[ S a. 2950.00 0 too 96 6 ve with Hacker Se l vtih MSs1Nil loll Cv, eo 765.00 3825.00 5 ea. 3825.80 O 900 108 ►urelsh b Inacatl 13" Cv' 12 as 912.00 10944.00' it ea L0032.00 0 too 11S b IN with Harker ' Furnish b tnbtall Vice Hy- f6 e& 458.00 39328.00' 16 e. 39326.00 0 too 8 drant Aseebbly, sla. pump Neehaaleat Compaction c L3519 2.00 t0270.00' 2701 $402.00 - 0 100 17a Furnish 6, Install 15" steel 160 90.00 14400.00 160 14400.00 - 0 too 149 casing St. weight l�J�scaoLIJ16 Steel Furr��jlhnb iL 0 lL 90.0o O30u.0U rl 1[ 6)00.00 O 100 S8 1551 turn15" CHP 120 tt 18.00 2160.00 110 2160.00 0 l00 166 ginstall rarnhs6 Iniseil IS" CMP 96 LL 19.44 ldhb.?4' Jun 1944.00 0 too lie Fusylh 6 Install 24" CMP Ga.tog 3111Q 21.59' 6477.00 )?i 7275.83 O l00 19B Sanitaryy Srvcr t:ne40$- wnt Br.•rnoba b il�rptaste tirl/SLLOG Asplus on. 1974. 5011.00 19.80 1001) 1UT' JHS50:60 1 .•a. 500.00 0 2124 42055.20 0 100 too 2AB t urtacin8 Sa dLnS 30S 30.nn 91;u.nbb n15n.lh► e 1p0 LC Trench excavaclon 9 600 4.00' s4uu.uu' 1217 4608.00 -1 Y 2C eas:l.il l l 0' -Ia.) Trench fxcay.seion 6 t L 1180 S.Ob) 5900.40 I L L17: 5010.00 0 l00 3C BAch(Llt (0'-12') Trench L/cavatiun 6 1L I8U0 6.111, 108110.01l tt I 2:2'I• 14574.01/ -' 0 too tic BerltlLIL (0'-14') TrdfAh�bcavactun b If 22t4 1.un 04•Ir1.Un' tt 1 0 BSl 5)S4.00 �� t00 5C sockeill (0•-16') Trench O/Cavot�i'� b 11 1gt6 ll B.0), 1S3I►s.n.b it 1 2155• 17212.00 0 It 900 6C BarktttL (11 - Itl �) Trench L'/cavatton (o' t✓) 12`9t9 10.01 1J/91) .uo 122.111, L2910.00 � 0 I00 _ `?� r' H 2� 'a,' 7c :ussglah b Install 8" D.I.P 168 15.058 1682.6: 112' 2036.56 0 l00 - ' SC Class SO w/App. Turn/sb b Install loll O.I.P. It 90.25 17.00� 66t4.:S 19' $00 8500.00 V O 100 Class 50/v/Appurcan3n.e It tL 1 ,� t, �.1 1 11 I I I EIZ! AM PERIODIC ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT NAME Alto 4004gos or cool joj*C 10. Doyle constniction (4111111doly Route 1, BOX 1225 4 Alnst­ 0F."loofe zIv1u4vV a*. 10 un� 29..198j, on @,..Qo �L ;L ow a -, ,, March 8, lP.P3 1. COST OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE UNDER ORIGINAL CONTRACT ONLY Pit ... *9 must be limited III work And Carlo, under the original contract only. 4111ded and tare J-A -in-Ire vhinrr• oravt% is to bv .10 pm# " W dli, I columns it I theuvsh (51 I*nIer Jac& -1-0 In column. 1, An.1 -I. ro.%pv,e#wIy,.jn purm M, I I pl@pArcd by Contractor. Columns (6)aojt7L Show oII*Orkc0"I#,cd to JAI@ under oriltin4l canoo.on. Column (8). Enter the diltatew between entries in columns (5) and lam (ft Show percent ratio of column (?)to column (S1 ITEM colo"ACT C011106.111110 To 0419 NO. 04SCRI"1011 Of IT96 0404"T. COO? 094 To"I.. COST ova"'. ?oval. cost Cos, or UNCOMPLETED goex coup 1-9 pl U-0. 7 ado YNII 01 le/ IN 9C Infial) 16p.11 D.I., Furni $611111 IF p 8675 25.74 223294.50 8623 221956.02 0 100 OC Install Manhole 46" Dia. 28ca 1800.0C 50400.00 280a. $0400.00 0 1" 0,12 Stan. Dept IC Additional Depth to Man. 125 ISO- *187SO.00 123 18450.00 0 0 100 2C Furnish 6 Install 2010 Steel 1.60 90.0 14400.00 160 14400. 0 Casing St. Weight V 3C Mechanical Compaction 2660 2,0 01 S320.00 553 1106.0 0 4C SC Seeding 225 30.0 6750.00 225 67SO. 0 100 Furnish 4 Install 2111 Steel 80 21.8 1748.00 go 1740.8 0 100 It 6C Remove 6 Replace Existing Asphalt Surfacing 153 By 19.8( 3029.40 153 3029.4f- 0 100 7C Constuct Beave Slide 2 es 200.0( 400.00 sy 2 as 400.01- 0 too SC Connect to existing sanctarl Sever Manhole 2 ea SW.O( 1000.00 2 as 1600.0(-0 0 100 0 NPleb 6 Install Sanitary tusPe 0000.0( 40000.00 37000.00 0 100 Torat. Or COST COL ."S pCM(OYL( OP CONIRACICNAN(,E ORDERS aC�rrr.M1y r 1N1 •.. I. •" •• .•lu r r r.. Ira.: rl• .-. 1.•.• rr yy•. ...n ,.r u. 7/el .•�tl, G-M1 tr. _•Pnr.•L Ca7Y:'. �aV{ . nf•!.•Ny rw'nnh l.•Ir. .r f••'r.. :•r-• tYCY JYfNaCr tJ. 4►:rfr- 71 C"• (r Crar, ',r If {r:r,Y C MaV.•t r`wC1w . o .tf Vi CV r.i1..iL ref. Y. •CI`f f• nr Dl .n.r•r.•♦M1 [Mantra! O.PLN •r1U:./CD On`{ni M1r Ca,r I r 11 '',, 1 4-6 61ieiat (fChaingesalhiwldti areas tls byy new f1uantities under original Contract on Page 1) 2 7-9 �tem e1�B Me�hanlcil Compaction 5321� $OIL tome 3 Mee anica Compaction 469 0 ItemAj9E fSper�Lal Manhole 2550 00 2550 00 tom A.0 ep aced 2 t. of 1611 C1S0 Sower Pipe 8 Assoc. Work 4835. 75 4835 75 3 8-6 Item 2111 love Phone Lines (lump sum) 10000 00 10000 00 Item 22B Extra Labor 8 E2q1p due to chpngcd cpt� dittion, STA 97-07.5 to Sta. l01091, 1 mP Sum) 11798 53 11798 53 4 9-10 Road Construct. R1Ldem oub235tAdeLtlonal 7529 1S 7529 1S 5 4-6 Items FC, �E, 3C, 4C, SC. 6C adjusted 1 e44 1570 00 1570 00 .0 q.f4 • TOTALS 38283 43 38283 43 10012 00 •.., 7. ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE 41$g$Y,687,13 J dal (lrisilMl const"s 4ono In, free. a • I,mI.•r Iha• Iurw1 fbl PIV.$ W illon• fCh, jukd m .olumfl Mawr ;{g1 tor, Ix sirs Ila•Jli.'umf aeh. dYl-d In r•rlue.n (Iabate 1 1d1 1JIa-r..l coofrxf an.aum ap doll. s(Al2.9 s. ANALYSIS OF WORK PERFORMED .41 a e-t .t NIe M11 •'IMtrJ•/ -W► i fl.rmt J 11. dale fCYI. y • Irene Pr thf, lam) 971,798.19 off ,!.1L%sr•-ore►prrtYrfnrIroJml fr.,.AIYY.rI �r 3$•2$3••i3 f.I1"1.l.J11 of -Left Pfr/rrn.rd IYJate 1,010,081.62 2: (1) Less. Amount retained in accordance rah contract terms else, lam Poorest sad soft., w"nq— (e/ xet amount earn If on carlfraee sock to date 1.010.0$1.62 ' 1 Ill Adds Materials stored at close of this 0 penal Grace etruf.d .cA.drb) � - fe/fvbsmsl of ft/and ff/ 1 0101 010 0� _ (III Lesst Amount of purl- P.Inwfs. 99$•4'6.50 , lit BALANCE DUE THO PAYMENT S 11.653.12 f% L CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR - �• Ateordinp to the beet of my knowlydes c and belief, I certify that all itemand amounts shown an she bee M this Periodic Estimaa la Partial Payment are .mitt$ that all work has Men performed and/or material supplied so full accordance sigh file aquiremonts of the crkr"ofl Contract, and or duly aulhorard dtrsartms, substtrurema, sbtiations, utd er additions, that the iotteome is a free and r-erect afsfinem of she ronfracf account up to and Meludfne the Ise$ day of the period c fweted by this PersodN Estpestai 1 that no pall of Ill* rrltalaMa glut, lb.e Ir.lriNal•• has btaa f.c.frrd. and that the wndre..snod and his wbrontrattua hsrr•fCresa .P1.•..ctfr t,,,aa ` a. Cr Complied snit silahe labs prors0uns of .siJ contract. b. `- CasPIN4 wish all Iha• labs rywraiom of said cml,&cc cue -Ft in shoat instances -hair an Metal dispute esins with re- .pac1 10 said labor prori.lms. Ito to) N .h.ea.d, deacrlbr is .for aafurt of d .w.N.J rt Mr .•rl Ifyap671M Avnn ! I.I J 111 Too. -. "fir t/"��Y t:r _4 _2 . {. CERTIFICATION Of ARCHITECT OR (NGIN(ER I . H. • ''� • i 1•andr ohm IW..Ifr4,1n,J..tMu•lit. d•rye a.Ji..rf..n,fl••.uJ..I.unur e.e l•m,q l4.mire. Ihwi f...kr IV •I YI ay ' .n1•. M .f(. Ind (+In 1 .I r• . IIN In l • NI.. I •I.II nu nl r•1 r .r► e, rIr•mr .l .I.J Ih.1 all .M w..N / ul • Yiy-11• •1 h• •It, • rMMI1.l ay. -.y►Ina +mare rut u.. Irr.J mrhr. l•. roar.. 1•nn.m bar• fyrr. rn,µ.N •1 b. to n•l nr eyro .Im• /Yln.wfnJ n r•••. elate, of MI. Ih's a I,— 1... N 1• Nu,w. 1 ­1 .I .YC1.1..1 •r• fan ... .y.l.n. r +Nil I. yn wr- M+ .1 r1. r. 1. it a.. a.Vrrr..1..ftJ •�N� '••• . 1•tnr•M .I..nI.1 ,n.11•gw .o.l 1•. SIP ..+NIa .,. •. rll.m..1 .n .L. 1. .•r r.•►I. N•rnr J. . N a111e• - '�,', •/ ,11 •YyrINJ Ire JIIe, r• Jt r.'a, � Q �e� �'/I A 3 •00"Ot:0 -Y _•Y Cis K£NAJ - — - - —' :red:; , ", :.•' /�•a�����•/ Wj ! .,rlN .} �6..lftdad✓ -.n i : t ... ... .E .. i w rM h _. . - • r.... .ryrr 1/ r �� I tYV .. _•.Er ... .... ._. .......... 2 .3-28-6i.t' _-s ; j +- •- • T. PREPAYMENT C9I1iIFICA1100 BY FIELD ENGINEER ;•rat { . 1 W.. , . 'i ♦ii Wy .. ri �, r�q • •. - csn.•.r•..f ore. •..nr .r, .ears• ..—.., _ ._.. .� `� 1 ill., . In.►. t fly.. Ian .r. ar •.n.• r r a. r. .r.f. . r An .rY. f,.r 1 .,.rr... • 1'..• n, n,., •rI n.1• . . • r. 1•.ae• .•• w. I•n. �I 1. 6 rn•p . • •rr• .1 11.; y,•r .. . •r.. .,. . .r I •. • r .. . r . , •r . u...• • Ir . nu Vl IAI• .. area we N } - y1•r.. -..r I. rl ...r, •. r... . r , nr• -I .0 ..•r.•r,, 1. on, •. 1 •. n...,„... ..r ,.l 1 } pt V:i• Ih11 •.• • Ira. ray .l.r yr. . .... :* Ira. /1 . ..vrl 1. - . il•• .1 If.. rl m1w111 • .. .. .... ... .r. ... . .. r. f r. ... .. .. .. .. . r. r, t. r r.. .ri�l r/,sV .1 1 � � 1 1 I i � MW A1,19ful COMMITTEES d •' ANCHORAGE OIL & OAS —(CO-CHAIR) ATE OF AFFAIRS—IVICE•CHAIRI h P.O. BOX T01843 LABOR & COMMERCE ANCHORAGE. AK MI f 1907► 344.00N RESOURCES pollee of 14pftsclii,'IwUTs JUNEAU POUCH V goof REPRESENTATIVE JUNEAU. AK 99511 JOHN J. COWDERY (465.9505007) 17 March 11, 1983 DISTRICT EIGHT Kenai City Council `y P. 0. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Kenai Council Members: On behalf of the many contractors who enter into the competitive bidding process for municipal projects, I wish to voice a strong complaint in regards to a practice commonly used by Alaskan municipalities when putting jobs up for bid. Every bid has an engineer's estimate for the basic bids and the alternate schedules and the municipality has a fixed amount of money known prior to the letting of the bids. Yet, when it is obvious the municipality does not have sufficient funds to complete it, the whole project is put out to bid. This is terribly unfair to the bidder, who might be figuring some costs for alternate A that only apply to the entire bid. Thus while being the overall low bidder he may lose out when only alternates A and B are awarded by not being low bidder on them as he was on the entire project -- however, it being possible for him to simply have put that schedule in the final bid rather than in alternate A or B. Thousands of dollars go into preparing such bids and some consideration should be given to this problem. I would urge you in the future to adopt a policy of not putting out to bid more than your engineer's estimate shows you have funds to pay for. Thank you for your attention to this matter of great concern to many of MY constituents. SF y John J. Cowdery Representative, District 8 l BILL SHEFFIELO i aovell�aw W OPiice or ?HE GOVERNOR J 1: Y IS A 11 March 28, 1983 INFO The Honorable Ronald Malston ' Mayor, City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mayor Malston: Governor Bill Sheffield has appointed Hydaburg resident Percy Frisby; Jim Kelly, Charles Elder, Jewel Jones, and H. Bruce Cooper of Anchorage; Sarah Scanlan, Joseph Fields, and B. B. Allen of Fairbanks; Barrow resident Abel Akpik; Marion Soule of Kodiak; John J. Williams_of Kenai; and John Shay, Jr., of Ketch kan to fill the vacancies on the � State Job Training Coordinating Council. The public announcement will have been made by the time•you r receive this letter; however, the Governor wanted me to inform you•of his decision by this personal letter. It was not easy for the Governor to select individuals from the many outstanding candidates. Sincerely, Carol A. Derfne ' Special Staff Assistant to the Governor i i i I --J p� �:tv a :�pK • P •'NMlTYi%r • . . .. �• few ;�.�•.I�� NNNAI PENINSULA BOROUGH •' • REGULAR ASSENOLV HINTING .. " APRIL S. 1981; ?;so P.H. BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILOING " SOLOOTNA. ALA56A ' • A NMDA •_. M ''.iiA A. CALL TO ORDER Assembly S. PL90GI O/ ALLEOIANCR sewn - Ssephnr { C. INVOCATION; Rev. Howard fafrely, arse• Irethr*n Anns � 0. ROLL CALL Church.•Eoaoi Corey Corr I. Vacancy, segigaation or $ating of Asseab. Cra=tt*l P. APPROVAL O/ NINUTEE Of North IS. loss OGimmick a. COIMIMI REPORTS Jose allele (a) Finance (Crawford. Corr, Carey, Gimmick. Ling Sewall) NClride "' (b) LOeal A/teiro/gd (Joan, Glick. Douglas. NCCIOud pone. NeWhan) NeWhsn ((e) public Works (Aroesa. Masride, Stephens. Ring) (d) Log fstotive Altair$ (Dimmick) i• Land Disposal (Corr, Crapuchottes, Glick) H. AGENDA APPROVAL .:). •.• 1. ORDINANCS HEARINGS (�) 1• "Asonding LPI S.tO.OSOA(T to Provide fsoir eg option proved By Resolution of the Assembly grog the Ilaqulrownt that purchase Orders lot Equlpmrmt Lists Should so Issued Within St months Alter the School facility Has seen turned over foo Snot/vial Occupancy. and Clarifying the Requirement" (Mayor) (b) "Ratosisg Lot Is. Ilk 13 Original CommmmercialDistrict. (Mayor) POSTPO09 Seward NEDPAOLimited1•T J. INTRODUCTION Of ORDINANCES (a) Ot0 d�Apprepr/sting the Total Amount of the School • r ct get gild A?pYYrortetiaB 19.065.197 for SCAMOI Purpose@ seed fI5,S00 for the Annual School District Audit for /V 03-14" (Mayor) ••,r •, - -•.. . (b) 05 dt a4'RedwtengOthe he Number um er Of Itgular,NootIngo Assembly g par Tear" (servo) (s1Ord, 01-11 "Dosegalifts to the city of House the owe o rovide losing Regulations within the City and Repealing sp/ 11.11-Npo 11.60 Inclusivo"(Mayor) S. CONSIDERAt10N 00 RESOLUTIONS (a) as "Req .also$ the State Department of ran�poor at108 to Designate the Awns of 1100.000 for epe peeiRn and planning of a scenic sacyele Rout* from the Cayt•id COO { 5189* g*ertatiom Area to the Soldotas fT (sills) (b) 120,13.61 " Negotiated Authorities a Land Sale NerTrfa n Borough patented Lands to Vlrgia/a L. Nilson" (Mayor pOSTPOMID /ISM S•15 (c) Res._11.12 Approving Construction Documents for the 096ISS5112 3CnOOB Addition 1 Renovation prolate • Authortting NcGlothlia Islivet Co, to proceed with the sldd/n1 Pharo" I RECEIVED ! : _ 1983 tw Nsrtv C�taK - 4` c:r► ar IctJu1 {j �' "•sea . ,. .. i - .r t �•,r:.. « .. a.7.ir•:.••..;' i; ___. __.._—__ _. w►•+•-nw. err-•.�.-..�. �. ••w .«��...• - __... ...�_.. r (d) M�0!� "Autaerltln{ s Contract for the Construction • uatum•�e tam. School Add. t Renovation project to (Meyer) (e) "}.__/!�tll "A ptovinS the School Board-s Selection o/ �« ec a gregrae /re)ect was{tonne services for the proVVosed Major /roJeess to be IRCIud•f en a geed -• %• �• proposel at gas Regular sor•uth election in o•t..1991" (1) • g •f A�revle[ Construction Documents for the ou en eau t 110•p//tal atoll Addition t Renovation rrotec! a Authoasin Mild$ John a 1/Sdon Architects to recaef With the eiddsn{�{ophq��a��ls IMgor� (t) or•s Vyet t In/ttpQwrterihtaiassi� for thsheltered Honda Honda - capped le the C•mlral taninsuis Area and the legislative 40400st far funding" (Glick) (h), "Retuestlof the Governor of Alaska t the r ren NS elsturo to Appropriate funds for the "design to Modero Stanford$ and the Replacement to Modern standard$ el /ridge$ end Celvo►es and previdiag Other good "M$tSp t "pair an ate YillieYsport/ p"ug• sway good" plMotC•hen, (!) xSiT2D"frov Afasafor tpinselas toSKosberAmending l the Alan" Soil Conservatism Board a" secludingwater Conservation Within tee Jurledietiom onf go.ftelas Jurasdtetionsl seunUries• (Corr) ()) Apprevist Increase to publicataem of the e or• ad$ to the goeU peetsouls from 10.000 C�eadi frdi 11bO0oo toidll�0� (Maio nor dyawrtjrleed (b) got. g)•00 Meoee "Ink Coadept Design Approvol(Mater) (1) • g -creating ■e ta$emtet lot public Access y Resonance Across terough Lends Within t. 9 TIM.tIlY.#S.M. t Left of Coke* Loop Road" (Ibrer� ' (m) Aueherlt/a`` Ararc of Ceetrtses to four a r•ore. t. tuehet(era floor Corerta$ and HMSO Cerptts for Carpet Re leefant as various School$ end eke "panditurt of to °e gas of Maintenance Contract Service$ Monies to Fees tot Wort" (Mayor) (o) M• R•gwstieS the State LgUteture to ropose • COn$tta0tions$ Asendeent and to Asend t A6teq Saws•$ to Gfmst losing love to School Districts" (MCG•hes) (01 g • $ false Otis Thilefoath e t. Islaeura o1 W• • • of A ask. to Acted AS 29.23.050 ae Allor Lossl Option In Methods of fit/lag a vacancy an the Assembly and to Comply With AS 29.21.021(d) fro - habitant Appelsemese of so Assembly Moabor BY and from a City Council" (MCGIboa) '(p) a ""twa Approval Sat the RA9"ditur•e ■ s• n rogue for [Cuip.eet naCemeary for the tlflclest aw."Sims of the oil tme•seecr Spate." (Mayor) (4) Re�•_d}•1¢ "Anedln{ the Allocattom of Mwiclost Rid" Wee iunfe provided In b$ewtion 03•11 y Transfefrims $100.000 from Nestor Laos. Mrettl Strtebarry and Leepl/{tit geed projects to the C/Daffy, goad Project" (Mayor) (to too. t "Trensforris the 8100,000 AYshor/ud toed, Masi 1 ipryerl of projeato to Lasptight as, Ron roc o"IfavlCofisir**be e•ad t0 el a COAt0•;1 Car)the (t) "eu 09 rtsoonpof Seward Alrste (MMccCloud)• Maalerm L. PENDING LEGISLATION (a) Ord. IS-19 "Inarming Estimated Romm, Proceeds frog Bond gelss in the Amount of 133410.000, end Increasing �•• Appropriations brr 117 140,000 for the Construction. Imams.►ng, and Lqu/ p1,n eh° public School projects iuscumama, Sgo"I.E. Nor Aallformky �••4..'L:r, it..n ri �.:• Beech Elesentory School. ntral Nigh. Nov Moasr Nlgh and Seldov/a" (Ibchoo NOVr► ''^:"'.-•:1!i";''^ s-19 He ^• (b) Ord. g3•f0 "Hiking an Appropriation to eh° Cep/sal Projecgs Pad in the amount of fltlsfd from She Proemade of the sale • • - - oI General Obligation Bonds for eh* Central peninsula Nospttel 9erten rtce Area for the Coptl (aprovoate of the Cants, Peninsula Mosplcal" (Naror) Moor 41-19 •..,.. '. Ste (c) Ord. 13•I1 "Providlog for a Local Nlr* Bidding Preference for Public Works Contracts within the gene► peninsula gorough•• •• (Iklmo/King/Oougles/Corr 1 Stephens) Near 4-19 (d) Ord. 83.9 "Providing for the Acquisition of powers Macassar, go Outsidelde Citiesdtoeito (undid tin State Aid eo Municipaliii: for Roods" (Ditemick get. L.A. 1 I.M. Mtn, 4•13) N. ►ORNAL IAMNITATIONS WITH ►RIOL NOTICE Upon MATTERS NOT ON THE MILTING AGENDA (a) Gr•er•Ietlsr Loop Road. Moser Area . Ingels/osenehy N. MATOR'S REPORT (a) Status of Court Cases In which the Borough is Involved. I (Ts be placed as desk) 1 0. OTNIN BUSINESS '. •.'. _ (a) Ord. g1.tl (lubstitupl "Provldlag for a torus paymane to Co°nstrutt/°e°Contnats wring l� . ; : ).: ,:. •• Works within the peninsula Borough• (Public leek* Coop) (h) QehooishiOlf and Iqulpment Lists for Nlkiski and NeNell Canyon j P. ASSEMBLY AND MATOR'B COMMENTS Q CONTAINS NTOOR1ASSSINLv*atAA6GENDDAIona UPON NATTERS NOT t R. INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS (a) pate/•gasilof Soil Cohmarvatioa Sub•Oistr►ct _ 1912 Annual Report (h) CorrasPomdtgao frog Legislators. S. MOTICI OF NEXT MEETING 1 AOJOUPMM (April It. 1903). , t4,�; y;r• ►glpr ENGINEER/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT STP Expansion CH2M Mill Section 36 Water 6 Sewer PDA Drainage Study Quedra Spruce Street Road Improvements WCB Third and Second Avenues Street Improvements WCS Main at. Loop/Barnacle Water, Sewer 6 Street Imp. WCB Lawton/Tinker/Welker/Rogers Street Improvements MT first, Birch, Fourth AVG. Street Improvements WCB Forest Dr. Ent. 6 Gilt Street Street Improvements WCB Second Avenue (Forest -Evergreen) Water, Sever 6 Street Imp. PDA 4 i • ` s r CITY OF KENAI ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (PEBRUARY 1983) MAJOR PROJECTS COSTS EST. COMP. Rv,Q' COMP, BID DATE CONTRACTOR CONST. 008T CONST. BUD./OTHER BUD DATE DATE FUND sub. comp. Brown $ 3,716,775/3,802,000/ 742,140 9/26/81 604 sub. comp. Doyle 1,050,536/ 72,600/ 607 sub. comp. 87,000/ 87,338/ 609 12/17/81 Quality 95,818/ 9S,818/ 21,150 7/15/02 702 12/17/81 Quality 130,800/ 137,147/ 26,248 11/16/82 704 r 8/31/81 Doyle 1,219,823/ 777,881/ 102,799 10/14/82 714 8/25/81 Quality 1,280,249/1,275,957/ 148,902 713 12/16/81 Quality 1,230,845/1,234,262/ 174,392 11/15/82 11/15/82 703 12/18/81 342,763/ 342,763/ 76,704 8/31/82 8/31/82 712 10/l/82 Doyle 184,890/ 225,000/ 51,000 1/12/82 716 1 ' ,'•lint ii', - .. �. biLiLi. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENGINPP.O/ ARCIIITECT BID DATE OONTRACTOR COSTS COSST. r1JST COSTT. BUD./OTHER BUD EST. POMP. RF.Q. COMP. � I Renovation 6 Expansion of DATE DATE FUND Municipal Airport Terminal Gintoli 7/29/82 H. Halvorson $ 1,619,804/1,645,000/ 35%000 7/20/83 ffi Kenai Recreation Center - Design 7/20/83 302 Gymnasium Addition Build 10/5/82 elazy 766,686/ 768,161/ 35,289 9/9/89 Senior Citizen's Community fOS Center Gintoli 7/14/82 Cordova 831."0/ 848,820/ 151.180 3/21/83 Harbor Study - C1121f Hill Fees. 6 201 TANS Sedimentation Study 6 Bag. ' 1980 Municipal Grant TANS / 500,000 20S Port Facility - Fueling, Docks, etc., State Bond Funds TANS 750,000/ 200,000/ 515,000 Boat Ramp - 1982 Municipal Grant TAMS 204 Wstev 6 Saver Improvement Study Trans-Ak.(PDA) / 125.000/ 608 Candlelight, Linwood, Lawton Ext. Kaknu. Aurora, Kiana Street, Water 6 Sewer HCS 4/15/83 /1,885,114/ 308.000 Heller, McKinley, evergreen, 710 3rd, 4th, 27th Water, Sewer 6 Road imp. Taurisinen 4/14/82 /1.560,000/ 201,080 ? Mosmsen Subdivision 731 f First 6 second street • Paving Nelson / 20,000(LSR6T) 718 } Aliak, NeCollua, Cinderella, Fox f Princess, Linwood Extension Gravel McLane / 28,288(UR6T) 719 2 i '`!' `" i ENGINEER/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT BtD DATE CONTRACTOR COSTS EST. COMP. COSST. COST COSTT. BUD./OTHER BUD DATE REQ. COMP. DATE FUND Standard, Richfield, Thompson P1. Gravel WCB $ / 18,000(L8Ra) 712 Airport Vehcile Parking Lot Paving PDA / 37,800 308 Airport Terminal Apron Reconstruction (Ramp Overlay) Tauriainen / 30,000 307 Airport S. Transient Parking Apron Extension (itinerant Pk.) Tauriainen / 24,000 306 Extend Main Apron - Airport Lake, Marine, Granite Point, 6 P.B.O. - Paving Spruce, Second, and Third Paving Thompson Park Gravel Jail Expansion (Schemstki)Gintoli / 6,000 022 3 r = MATERIALS AND IN-HOUSE. ENGINEER/ COSTS EST. COMP. REQ. COMP. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT •BID DATE CONTRACTOR CONTT. cos -WC -Om. BUD./OTHER BUD DATE. DATE FUND Airport Fencing - ADAP JL 3/30/83 Alaska Fence $ 1579497 Fort Kanay, Carpet RH 3/8/83 4D Interiors 5/20/83 Eire Hydrant Ext. JL 10/1/82 Doyle 10,000/ 5/15/83 Parke 6 Rees Concrete Courts JL Concession Stand Renov. JL New Restroome 6 Concessions JL Fitness Trail/Ryan Creek Park JL / "'S00/ 5,500 209 Port Kenay Restoration KK/HH In-house / 52,000 111 Library Expansion / 5,000 202 New Alarm System JL/KK 55,000 Lower Lift Stations JL 6,000 Paint Melt House Tanks JL 16,400 Platbed Truck RE 25,000 Street Sweeper JI, 4/27/83 95,000 Gravel KK 3/30/83 Better Concrete 20 000 4 ,:� , PUBLIC WORKS LIST GOALS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Copies KK JI, Date HH Res . Rec'd. Description KH KK Develop system for utility coordination on projects KK/TR Develop utility location corridor ordinance KK Renumber City vehicles - Ernie KK/JL Inspection report form KK/JL/KH/Dave Reorganize office and clean up HH Fort Kenay Carpet Rebid Completion Date - May 20, 1983 KK 4 Easements on LACK project HH Gym Inspection HH Building Maintenance - City Hall Entrance - ice problem JL FAA Fencing Project - March 30, Bid Date JL Valve Study KK/JL Develop new standard set of: a. Bidding Document Generals b. General Conditions c. Technical Construction Specs d. Standard Details Hold Street acceptance form, also water & sewer acceptance from to length, width, surface, u t by KH/Dave Locate, catagorize, and update all City mylars for City streets, water, sewer, storm drainage, buildings, etc. 1 Date Res . Rec'd. Description JL/Dave Update or compile the 0 6 M manuals and maintenance records for: 2 well houses 6 lift stations 1 underground pump house KK/JL Using technical construction specs develop a complete review and approval procedure for subdivision development - preliminary plat/engineer design of improvements/construction/final plat approval. Possibly include subdivision agreements. TR Right of way and land disposal - Spur Frontage Road: a. Sell a lot to Hansen next to Benco b. Sell a lot to Alaska State Bank TR/KK Review and revise the Septage Dumping Ordinance when new STP is on the line. JL/WJB Investigate possible gravel pits: a. VIP area b. Beaver Loop area C. Thompson Park area for either City owned land or purchase d. Area behind woodland - Al Poore JL Design & bid set up 1. Restroome at Softball fields 2. All purpose courts (3) Old Town - 4th Street - Beaver Creek 3. Enclose ramp area at Recreation Bldg. Kayo Contract with Leonard Efta for renovation of concession stands at Little League Baseball area and at the adult softball fields. JL Ryans Creek area for fitness trail KK Emergency Generator Van - Ernie JL Fire hydrant repair project 2 F - Reap. KK KK/JL KK JL KK JL KK/JL JL JL Lf� KK Date RecId. Description Develop or update a project check lists grant application/application/allocation: grant offer and agreement/resolution accepting grant/advertising for A/E/award A/E/right of way problems/review design plans and specs/work with utility companies/construction ad/pre-bid/bid/ pre-construction/approval to award from State and Federal/resolution awarding construction/issue award/notice to proceed/sign contract/process pay estimate/review and process change orders/ get approval from Council, State, Federal for any change orders or force account problems Federal Revenue Funds: Flatbed Truck Street Sweeper - Bid 4/27 2s00 Gravel - Bid 3/30 2s00 Paint Water Tanks Warning System Lower Lift Stations Library Security System Draw up list of concrete repairs - curbs and gutters, sidewalks, retaining walls for bidding - P,O, work on new or changes in ordinances concernings a, Proper placement of utilities in right of way b. Water & sewer line laterals off of mains c. Think about one contractor doing all water & sewer service lines, d. Look at controlling equipment on City streets - something to require them to clean up street, repair broken items, patching pavements, etc. e. Look into better control of fire hydrant use. 3 l' Date Res . Rec'd. Description KK/JL/HH update or revise method of water & sewer service line hook ups - require three survey ties for curb stops, water & sewer service line as -built filing system water and sewer permitting KK Set up generator maintenance contract and schedule for service - budget Mark Finish work on beach foot bridge - anchor line in? JLB Title search for easements on Gov. lots KK Stevens vs. City case (snowmachine at Airport) Check on maintenance agreement on street lights. Energy grant high pressure sodium (yellow) agreement with Soldotna. KK/JW Order and install new mike in Chambers. KH Status Report List for Current Projects/ Materials & In -House Lists KK Take pictures of City for Research Design KH Apply to DEC for oiling permit KK/JL Harbor Improvements - Boat Ramp . KK Review Redoubt Terrace $4 Plans & Specs 4 i April 6, 1983 City Council Mayor City Manager City of Kenais E�tY?..jt'h/ �t r• urn rc;.r�� i I have a prospective buyer wishing to make an offer to purchase and as required by Title 22, chapter 5 we are requesting that the City negotiate a sale of a parcel of land commonly known as Section 36 (containing approximately 300 acres) as perscribed in 22.05.040. We do not believe that any competitive interest to purchase the entire tract exists. I also wish to register myself as a "real estate agent" as referred to in 22.05.040 M and in the event my applicant purchases the tract, ERA Property World will be entitled to a 10% commission and in the event the property is sold at public sale to someone other than the applicant ERA Property World will be entitled to a 5% commission. Sincerely, ?rr6-,YUt C. Andrews, ERA Property World _ � --~— �� y\