Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-20 Council Packet - Work SessionKenai City Council Work Session July 20, 1983 Relocation of Power Lines Cannery Worker Facilities Parks and Rec - City Growth Section 36 Development ( CITY OF KENAI 'Y d eapda� 4 4ia44a" /. O. SOX HO 11[NAI, MASKA 99611 �sll/NONs 216 • 7"s NOT IC% OF WORK SeGl3IItN There will be a wor orw4—i� Council on Wednesday, July 20, 1983 at 4s0O PM in tho Council Chumboro, To be dioouaaods o, Relocation of Power Linea ° b, Cannery Workers' Paciliti©n Co Perks & Relocation Commiealon - Gonaral Mmeter Plan with Noodu, Population Growth d. Section 36 Developmant I'i 1<� ? not Wholsn City Clerk DATEDs July lip 1903 f , `1 9 Ul' L 0 I - =AtF O ti Kenai Packoru Personal Proportys 1#763,147 x 5.49 millo Real Proportys 2,1780000 x 5.49 millo Sal_ amatof Personal Proportys 1#6119945 x 5.49 millo Real Proportys 940,000 x 5,49 millo Columbia -Wards Personal Proportys 6960295 x 5.49 millo Real Proportys 1,8789000 x 5,49 millo Fisherman's Pocking Poroonal Proportys 704#970 x 5.49 mills Real Property$ 998,000 x 5.49 mills $ 9,679.68 11 957.22 21 $ 8,849.56 52160.60 uiu.10 $ 3,822.66 1�00110.22 y 14 ,13'1.Ul $ 3,876.63 5,479,02 i, 56 ° NOTES 1. The City mill rate of 2.10 would be l000 than 50% 2. Total taxoo paid by oannorys $59#135,61 I 3. Thia dooa not include fiohing boato or fish tax money, 4. The City should have amount they received from firth tax last Your* A. r� a •i 1' I/ i' 4.' P L_ t Y, ti s� . Kenos City Couneil Work 3000ton Soation 36 - Dovolopsoont Gtnndardo The Council diocuooed tho iooue of whether oomprohonnivo deoign and ongineering should bo undertaken by tho City prior to disposal of Section 36 landa. It woo oxproaaod that the Council assume limited involvomont in the diepoonl preoono, yot ootnbiinh minimum standards to enouvo ordorly dovolopmont. In lieu of the recommended comprohonoivo planning approach roforonood abovo, I would advioo tho Council to considor adopting dovolopmont standards for prop000d capital improvomont, Th000 olomonto would includa, but not be limited too - I 1, Rights -of -way — o) Location b) Width c) Travel surface improvomonto (gravol, pavoment, curb ano guttor, eto.) d) Nan -vehicular improvomonto (oidowolke, biko pothn, sto.) 2. Water Dictribution Syotom a) Location and sizing of maino b) Stub -cut provisions i 30 Sanitary Sawor System s) Location and sizing of molno b) Stub -out provisiono 4, Storm Drainage Plan r + a) Alternative dooigno for storm wator monogomont h. Street Lighto a) Intorsoctiono only b) All aloe rat root c, g 6, Provision for othor utilitioo (location, oaoomonto, j; Ste.) oa a) Power - HEA e) Goo - 905CO c) Telophone - Glacior State d) TV - InletVioiano � ., ,....,. � . ... ems. ,. ...,•. , �R•- - -y It is recommended thnt the ootnhlinhod devolopmont atnncinrrfa be J incorporated into the oalo agreement an binding construction requiromenta. Nocenanry plan reviow, approval and inol)uction to I be accompliahod by the City. In conjunction with oatablishod development atandnrdo for improvoments, thorn aro other Innuon the Council may winh to addreoo on conditiono of oalos I A. Zonings Existing toning to Rural Realdontial (RR), Rezoning to Suburban Rooidontial (RS) would require that all construction be nerved by municipal water and nower. The requirements of the RS zone could be modified through optional development ordinances (t©wnhoune, planned unit development, ate.) in effect at the time of construction, Given thin approach, residential dovelopment oervod by on—oite facilities would be prohibited. B. Plattinqs The bluff portion of Section 36 to not platted. If the Council desires to oubdivido the property into approximately four "tracts", It In advionble that necessary rights -of -way be dedicated and "blocko" eatablinhed. The developer would than have the flexibility to plat individual lots to accomodate a particular dooign concopt, C. Phasing of Improvementas Although otandarda for development can be eatabliohod, there to no noouranco that construction will result, A time frame for development could be incorporated no a condition,of solo. for example, a specified percentage of proposed improvoments or construction of a defined numbor of living units could be I required to be accompliahed within a given time achodulo, A revisionary clause can be utilizod to Wnd the grantoo to provide the specified improvomonto within a defined time { schedule. Realizing that defining and establishing such "rootrictions" on the land contemplated for diopoual will be oomewhnt difficult and unpopular, it may be worthwhile for the Council to dofine goalo and objectives to guide disp000l policy. The following to offered ass an examples 1. Expand the City'a economic boon by conveying public lando into private ownerohip, r 2, Provide additional building lots for residential eonatruction to accommodate future growth. 3. Promote orderly development so no to minimize the impact on the City's financial r000urcos, w r A mom 4. Allow development flexibility And aotnbliah minimum standards to encourage quality but affordable houaing. This may enable the Council to decide whether spocific development standards are conaintant with the purpose of the land diap000l program. JL/dq r� r<. a .. =r,