The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1983-12-21 Council PacketKenai City Council Meeting Packet December 21, 1983 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 219 1983 - 7:00 PM ! PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Don Nickel, D.C. r - City Water 6 Sewer C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, Ordinance 905-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - State Library j Grant - $89650 2. Ordinance 906-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - State Grant for Fire Training - $39000 3. Ordinance 907-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Library Donations - $590 4. Resolution 83-158 - Transfer of Funds - Cost Overruna, Senior Center - $19081 5. Renewal of Liquor License - Italian Gardens 6. Renewal of Liquor License - BPO Elks 02425 D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, Dec. 79 1983 E. CORRESPONDENCE F. OLD BUSINESS i t i ?e7 d i .7'• 1 G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 gv,v_� 3. Ordinance 9O0-83 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - rr0`00 Conflict of Interest & Engaging in Business Relationo with City of Kenai j4. Ordinance 909-83 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code B,� Increase Insurance Liability on Lessees to 500/�•W250 5. Ordinance 910-83 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Changing Procedures on Sale of City Lands 6, Ordinance 911-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - State Grants Senior Citizens - $160,114 7. Ordinance 912-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Community Service Program - $5,742 8. Ed Lowry - Amended Lease - Sprucewood Glenn S/D % ey 9. Discussion - TAMS Feasibility Study - Barge Terminal cy10. Discussion - Reynolds & LLoyd Proposal - Public Relations on Capital Improvement Projects 11. Assignment of Lease - Ackerly & O'Connell to Peninsula Dairy Queen 12. Concept Lease Application - K. Carver - Unsubdivided City -Owned Land# CIIAP ' ----t3. Boat Launch Ramp - Del Mar Inc. - Change Order #2 - $2,627.38 14. Discussion - Intersection Illumination, 5 Areas H. REPORTS ' 1. City Manager _{ 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7, Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE BEARD ADJOURNMENT BP,icS 13 COUNCIL MEETING OF I RAT I � zu W-P-71.70- MEM, rijimmoss a 0 Macao Ono 0 soon s�rw��r��►��irur��i►�►�►�nu�■�■tee SOMME • �,� COUNCIL MEETING OF F I I Y t� "f vY i i .11 DECEMBER 21, 1983 INFORMATION ITEMS 1 - Judge's Reply to Summary Judgement, City ve Amberian 2 - Dismissal, A.C.I. ve City 3 - November Library Report 4 - TAMS Statementp Harbor Study 5 - Finance Director Brown Memo, 1972 Bond Election 6 - Professional Design Assoc. Statement - Airport Overlay & Itinerant Aircraft Parking Project 7 - Professional Design Assoc. Statement - Airport Parking Lot Project 8 - Finance Director Brown Memo - Analysis of Bond Sale 9 - Del -Mar Inc., Final Statement, Boat Launch Ramp 10 - Trane-Alaska Engrg. Statement, Utilities Plan 11 - Wm. Nelson & Assoc. Statement, let & 2nd Ste. Project J. 'N f. t .. Suggented by: Administration h CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 905-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $8,650 AS A RESULT OF LIBRARY ASSISTANCE GRANTS FROM tHE STATE OF ALASKA. _ WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has received two Library Assistance Grants totalling $8,650 from the State of Alaska for library books and other library materials. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: i i State Library Grants $8,650 Increase Appropriations: Library -Books . 8,650 4 � v PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 21st day of December, 1983. f OM WAGONER, AYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by F inance: re�.3 i 11 rirst Reading: December 7, 1983 Second Reading: December 21, 1983 'Effective Dale: December 21, 1983 1 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 906-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $3,000 AS A RESULT OF A GRANT FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA FOR FIRE TRAINING. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has received a Fire Training Grant from the State of Alaska in the amount of $3,000, and WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has authorized the City to sub -grant the money to the Alaska State Fire and Arson Investigators Association to help finance a seminar on fire and arson investigation to be sponsored by that association. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section It The following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund JIncrease Estimated Revenues: State Grants $3,000 Increase Appropriations: Fire -Grants to Other Agencies $3,000 Section 2: By acceptance of this sub -grant, the Alaska State Fire and Arson Investigators Association agrees that it will provide the City of Kenai with adequate expenditure documentation for submittal to the State of Alaska for relmbursoment. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 21st day of December, 1983. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Aporoved by Finance:-* 0 TOM WAGONER, MAYOR First Reading: December 7, 1983 Second Reading: December 21, 1983 Effective Date: December 21, 1983 IJ r• . �.... .. ..... N �i� k. .-.. _ _ r 0 i Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 907-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $590 FOR LIBRARY DONATIONS. WHEREAS, the City has received approximately $590 in library donations and charges for lost and damaged books, and WHEREAS, the Librarian has asked that this money be appropriated for the purchase of library books. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF " KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: - General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: . Library Donations $590 Increase Appropriations: Library -Books $590 A n, PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 219t day of December, 1983. I YON WAGNER, M O ATTEST: Janet Who an, City Clerk First Readinh: December 7, 1983 Second Reading: December 21, 1983 - Cffective Date: December 21, 1983 Approv►:d by Finance: - - - - . ^ MI�Sfilfs -y i Suggoated hys Administration CITY OF KENAI ` RESOLUTION NO. 63-150 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1983-84 KENAI SEN44fl-C t+S s �tG�r /PR�ODECT ((� From: Social Services es $ 66.00 Congregate Meals Health $ 46.00 Operating Supplies 595.00 341.OT I Home Delivered Meals Health $ 28.00 Operating Supplies 273.00 Repair & Maintenance Supplies 73.00 .0 O DOE Tot Social Services 1 Printing & inding $ 21.00 Postage 45.00 l 6. O Con re ate Meals $ 46.00 Printing & Binding 13.00 Utilities $ 502.00 -6-4 .UU r . Home Delivered McaI3 i Es $ 20.00 Repair & Maintenance 346.00 374.0U l yj This Lrnnufer is needed for coat overrun:; during Lhe calendar '. your grant period ending 12/31/03. f' J ' a , 4 I ../J .. a ♦_ .._ ... _. .. .�.. _.... .. �� .....� PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 21st day j of December, 1903. Tom Wagoner, Mayor ATTEST: I j ane a an, City CleR i Approved by Finances t: i r _.r. SY &YE Uv ALASKA BILL BHEFFIELO, GOVERIVOR tot EASr 9M. AVENUE ALCOMOLICEEVERAGE 00NMOL ITOARD ANCHORAGE, ALA$KA 99sot ' December 5, 1983 �;'z� ti Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 �•.,..,� Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Ms. Whelan: We are in receipt of the following application(s) for renewal of liquor license(s) within the Citx of Kenai _ You are being notified as required by A3 . 2 . RESTAURANT/EATING PLACE Italian Gardens A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the applications) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the i I: I i .. i x. , 0 board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reason'sTn support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest 1s arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE MUNICIPALITY MUST COME FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS 04.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) munici- palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro- hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of •'service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.145(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to pro- test an application if a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the,sale or con- sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS 04.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. Sincerely, Betty L. Calhoon hecords & Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 BLC:vk Enc. i J 1� U 0 Q Q Q BILL SHOPPIBLD, GOVE#TNOR � � a�a,a��►ae�rraac�tar�r ®� aa�o►c��a�� 1 201 EASr 9M, AVENUE ALCY!WL/COEVER40ECONTROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99601 l i ��e1-111 P,6, December 16, 1983 '�309 ' Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Ms. Whelan: We are in receipt of the following applications) for renewal of liquor license(s) within the City of Kenai You are being notified as requireW 110004 CLUB B.P.O. Elks #2426 A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the applicatlen(s) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the „ c board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons 7n support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS O4.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE MUNICIPALITY MUST C014E FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS O4.11.420(b) munici- palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro- hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.145(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to pro- test an application if a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the•sale or con- sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS O4.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. Sincerely, Betty L. Calhoon hecords 6 Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 BLC:vk Enc. r . �,► � mac,`., `. AGENDA► r "� ' ..h.�d�Yl�!�T�.•10(..��'rri/��'f%M.M-.J�:!'.1f� t% i� KI.NAI Ctfy COIINCII. - REGIILAR MLI.TING DECEMOEH 7, 190f, 7100 PM PLEV61': OF AI.I.CGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agondo Approval B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 902-03 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Engineering for Police Addition - $107#492 2. Ordinance 903-03 r Incronoing Rov/Appne - Engineering for Library Addition - $107,492 3. Ordinance 904-03 - Entobliohing Tenancy Roquiromonto - Airport Terminal 4. Approval of Liquor Licenoo - Renewal - Little Ski No 5. Approval of Liquor License - Renewal - Casino Bar and Casino Liquor Store D. MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting, Nov. 30, 1903 E. CORRESPONDENCE F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requlottiono Excoodieg $1,000 3. Ordinance 905-03 - Increasing Rev/Appne - State Library Grant - $8,650 4. Ordinance 906-83 - Increooing Rev/Appne - State Fire Training Grant - $3,000 5. Ordinance 907-03 - Increasing Rov/Appno - Library Donations - $590 6. Connont to Soh-Looao - Granath to Johnson - CIIAP N. REPORTS 1. City Mannger 2. City Attornoy 3. Mayor 4. City Clark 5. Finance Director 6. Planning A 2onlnq 7. Harbor Commission R. Recroottoon Commisnion 9. Library Commission 1. PERSONS PRESENI NOT SCHEDULED 11) 0E HEARD ADJOURNMENT i KENAI tl IV CIIUNCIL, REGOLAR Ml.t IIND, MINUiE`i i DECEMDEH 7, 1903, 700 PM KENAI CIIT ADMIN151HATION HIIILOING VICE MAYOR MEASLES PRE910ING � PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE A, ROIL CALL A-1 AGENDA APPROVAL ; o. Vtoo Mayor Mcnaloo nnkod that Item 0-1 be added, John i willlmmn, Small Boat Harbor. I ! b. Vice Mayor Monolon linked that ttom R-2 he added, Ed Lowry, Amended Lonna, Spruunwood Slotin 6/0. Council approved the agenda on amended. I R. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO HE HEARD - H-1 John Williams - Small Goat Harbor Harbor Commlonion Chairman Williumn explained he hoo put a „ lot of poper in front of Council for them to review for the next meeting. i ,..,. .. ••••: o. Heat Romp. Harbor Comm. mot 12-6-03 with TAMS ,-�,--.•;..;�:;, ,'•:,",".:<.: Reprocontative Mike Horton, Engineer LoShot and „�. Councilmon Aokerly. They liotonod to both oldoo of the quoutien regarding Engineer Loghotro letter to TAMS. _ All were covered ootiofnctortly, the lotter..to Council .;. diatributod thin data reports on thi.e. Thin entire ", project woo nuked to bo done with minimum coot. The ! idea woo to build oomothing that we could fine all moterialn on other projocto at a lntar data. The job coma in over -bid. It woo notimoted of $150,000, it coma in at $200t000+ with $13,000 over run. The Commlootan concluded it woo bncouoet - Look of bidder Internet to compotinpp for the work, Contractora were buoy with othor John. t - Banding woo difficult to obtain for marine work. There were 3 biddoro for the Job. Thu out of town builder woo the beat and the low bidder. The Commlonion won planned with the job, they hod a nub-committoo that took picturno and chocked it out. - Is. The ieodrickoun prop000l for a borgo facility. The .: Commlonion looked TAMS to do a otudy of the coot. the ��"•wri.y. rr��d+ City will not be involved in thin, but the City may be naked to ooll development betide, It to common _ practice for government agn"eloo to review the :. f000ibility of projocto for private industry. The City will not ,jot into the dock buoinonn. The Corpo. of Enginuorn to upending milllono of dollars in the State. In the midat of a rouenalon, the Anchorago dock ban 11% more in rovonuo this" loot year, work is up. The ootlmntud cent of tho eludy to $25,260. If this; to dovni"ped, thio will he "nod money, Fu"dt► can be taken from the ortginai grant an the river otudy, t.harn in a balance of 607,OD0. His naked Couneit to review thin find act on it at the . ! one. 21, 1903 mile►.tng. C. Hoytioldo A Lloyd Propaaal, publie relations. Thera are r S regional projocto in Clio Capital imprnvomont Lint. ..... �l Thu Commlonion wan rtlnCeroo d haw to put file projoat forward find tint appoor fee fitly lhairo woe the only one jI bs built. Thu idea won to have a public rolationa .} term for all the projocta. lily rotitorlad Hay"oldfi b Lloyd, Choy recently did the part facility for Nome. I, I' 4 i I • f o -. I ofNl]Yu¢!di*)Y,ln 1t"1.�71C4'r��*T+O.l :5F�1try;Itrj •;+q..�p/y�.�,..l ariMN*.�n: ..,,.,yl.f u; i{.ah CITY (IV KENAI DkCEMllt:lt 7, 1963 Patio 2 They are not a lobbylnq grnup. Ito naked Mr. Lloyd to pruporo On ontimotot it to $10,975. flint in 1/3 of it of the t.ntilt capital improvement projects coot we are nakinq for ($7 Million). For that they hnva agreed for A olido pruoontation - Sponchoo at chombseo, etc. Press roloonan - Stories for the media Thu State will spend novorol million dollars on capital improvement projecto. In the pant Kona/ has done without. Funding fur the City ohnuld have boon $12 Mutton, we received $h00#000. Anchorage received over $200 Million, over 1/2 of the Stoto total. We have not gone out and produeod our story to the State. We have opont Molloy on projects that have producod loon than that. Councilwoman Monfor nokod, woo thin the only company contacted? Chulcmon Williams replied yoo, they did not cook bids. Same times you take a look at eorvicoo offered. This does not require a bid. 0-2 Ed Lowey - Amended Lease - Sprusowood Glenn Subdivision Mr. Lowry said ho hall boon talking to Land Mnnagsr Labohn regarding splitting his property into 3 pereela and ppurchasing the roar parcel. Mr. Frykholm did on apraisal. Me. Labohn in preparing the lesson. He would ltko tpo purchase the roar 1/2 of the property, rather than the entire area. In March he will want to do the front half. Atty. Rogers reviewed, he would rescind the present lease and hnv_o 3 le000a,--•Me-nokod, when he purchases, would it be or-fivat or contract of onto? In a deed of trust the City requires lot position, in a contract of Oslo they do not. Mr. Lowry replied, he would cosh out on any the City did not have tot position on. Ally. Rogers noted he would Novo the right to buy, but there to no assurance he will be ouecoOOful h►ddor. Mr. Lowry suits he thought the lonone huo lot fight of refusal, Atty. Rogern replied what he nako may be promoturo. No did not know what Me. Lowcy'o poott/on woo. The plot woo Just delivered thin data. Ho naked 1/ Council could delay their decision. Mr. Lobahn added, the myler ahould be in by Dec. U. Atty. Rogora asked if Mr. Lowry intended to bond tho project bocouno he woo not able to comploto an much on intended. Mr. Lowry ropliod.yna, it if) certain Administration will have to review thin. No understood thin woo o formality, it was usual procedure. Atty. Rogers replied he was not aware that it woo uausl procedure, nor that the Code provides for it. Mr. Lowry asked if there WOO o specific problem with thin. Atty,. Rogoro ropllod, he wanted to take a look fit it furthor. No woo made aware of it thin date. Mr. Lowry said he had boon trying for 2 manthO to got thls done. Atty. Rogers asked if he had anourancoo from City Mansgar Brighton, Mr. Lowry replied he talked to him 2 timoo. No added, he would be bonding 10 Into not of the 23 to bring rondo up to standard. Mr. Labohn explained tho quoution u► more a msttor of timing than Onything oleo. the plot. in the loot go -around. It, will he ready for the final 12-8-83. 'thorn are carve prnrequinitso. We have its hnva ilia plot and installation nryroomont. This inslnlloliOn ngreamont dnnn not came to Council, thano are preroqulei►ao for movioq forward. The breakdown of Inflows hen to he opprovad by CouneII. Alty. Roquro with.lrow stiff Objection. Councilwoman Monfor note) her problem WOO in bringing it to Council thin dolo. Councilman Winn 0ei4 Ph/. han not rov►ownd or approved the preliminary plot nub,jact to oubdividinq. Mr. Lowry replied the proliminary has been approved. Councilman Wien said, for the overall tract, tint on the oubdivinion. Mr. Lowry replied the preliminary tract f I - - - r�...,...�r...ww�i��tiiirrtirude.�i�iri.r;' ... _ _ -:•. _ - � <:y� • - /i -- I i CITY OF KENAI DECEMBER 7, 1903 Page 3 i " •' hoe boon approved by P8Z a month ego. Mr. I,nhehn nald , :. there woo no roaaon for P&Z to care agoin. Ally. Roger naked ` If the lonaaa were current. Mr. Lnbohn ropliod, they are I 1-1/2 monthu delinquent, there are no othor probloma. Mr. +� ••.;-'•5„ :.•• ) Lowry eotd he would break qround in March for the commercial sopect. Councilman Ackarly naked why it could not wait 2 y<s "I: •.sre. - weeka. Mr. Lowry ruplled,overyth►ng to booed an Pinanaing. �d•t ''' He brought It to Mr. Brighton 3 times, Mr. Lobohn 0 to 10 I timoo. He wan told he hod to come to Council. Council agreed to review thin at the Doc. 21, 1903 meeting. Mr. Labohn woo naked to ouhmit the material to PGI no an information item at their Doc. 14 meeting. i :. .. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 902-83 - Incronaing Rev/Appno - Engineering for Police Addition - S107,492 ; f ; f ':5•.. _ r. ! } MOT ION, Councilwoman Bailto movod, oocondod by Councilwoman Monfort to adopt the ordinance. ° " There woo no public comment. Councilmen Hine naked if Adminlotrotion revlowod the Coyle ` -•••• requoot for legality of the appropriation. Clock Nholn"i :,.. a;f�;;��`•`. she hod not received a directive from Council, it replied I • woo from the audience. Councilman Niao asked if Adminiatration could chock to can if it woo logel, did the _.... _ •.�;- � referendum embody the resolution. Atty. Rogeeo replied, it ,- _ s .... to legal, a memo will be prepared regarding the ballot. j 1 Motion penned unontmouoiy by fall call vote. C-2 Ordinance 903-83 - Increasing Rev/Appno - Engineering for Library Addition - $107,492 •, - - ... MOTION$ Councilwoman Boilie moved, noconded by Councilman Ackorly, to adopt the ordinance. I There woo no public comment. - Motion panned unanimously by roll call vote. I • A 'cwstortraa•�.�rtxr`snr�r+�*:i . C-3 Ordinance 904-83 - Estobliah►nq Requtremente - sTenancy Airport Terminal MOTION$ r ' Councilman Ackorly moved, oocondod by Councilwomen Bailin, to adopt the ordinance. { 1 Atty. Rogar" naked Council to tnblo the ordinance. He hen j met with Airport Manager Swfillny, they do not have approval .. % from FAA. They were made awaro of thin, but have not rooponded. They are the final authority. Ha d►utribut.ed oomo material relating to loaned "pace in the termtnnl. MOTION$ Councilman Ackorly moved, nernnde.l ny Councilwoman Hattie, i to table the ordinance till feb. 15, 1984. r_ Motion panned unanimously by roll call vote. ;•th .... r.. .�� ........... ,, t 1 is • I - „ 1 CITY OF KENAI 0ECEMBER 7, 198I Pogo 4 ADDED ITEMS Councilman Wine said he had boon contoctsd by a car rontal operator in the nirport terminal. There are 2 concession phones in the terminal competing with those who have offices. Ha suggested Administration shack into thin and report back to Council. Council agreed to the outigeotion. C-4 Approval of Liquor License - Renewal - Little Ski Mo Clerk Whelan reported they are current in their taxon. MOTION$ Councilman Ackorly moved, aocondod by Councilwoman Bailie, to send a letter of non -objection to ABC regarding Little Ski Mo. Motion passed by unanimous conoont. C-9 Approval of Liquor License - Renewal - Casino Bar and Casino Liquor Store Clerk Whelan reported they are current in their taxes. MOTION$ Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to send a letter of non -objection to ABC regarding the Casino Bar and Liquor Store. Motion passed by unanimous consent. D. MINUTES 0-1 Regular Meeting, Nov. 70, 1907 Minutes were approved an submitted. E. CORRESPONDENCE None F. OLD BUSINESS None O. NEW BUSINESS 0-1 Bills to be Paid, Sillo to be Ratified MOTION# Councilwoman Bnil►e moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to approve the hills no nebaltttod. Motion peened unanimously by roll call vote. 0-2 Requisitiono Exceeding $1,0011 ' MaTIONs Councilwoman Bnii/e moved, necanded by Councilman Ackorly, to approve the requiattiena t,o oulrmittod. Motion passed by unanimous conoont. 1! p F - �•�*rw�exr�friisi�'.i�:avri�li;�ii£�iii� I I .r CITY Of KENAI DECEMBER 7, 1901 Pago 5 Councilman Wino noted the $2,500 on utroot lighto. Hoo anything boon done? Engineer La&hot replied nap they have had a problem with the boom truck. Councilman Ackoriy aukod if they wore replacing with the aama mercury vapor lighto. Councilman Wino eakod if they were going to turn off thooe that burn 24 hourn a day. Engineer LeShot replied you to both. 0-4 Ordinance 906-03 - Incronaing Rov/Appno - State fire Training Grant - $3,000 MOTIONi Councilman Ackerly moved, nocendod by Councilman Winn, to introduce the ordinance. Notion peened by unanimouo conoont. 0-5 Ordinance 907-03 - Increnoing Rov/Appno,Librury Donattono- $590 MOTION. Councilman Ackerly moved, oocondod by Councilman Wino, to introduce the ordination. Motion peened by unanimous conoont. 0-6 Conoent to Sub-Lesoo - Granath to Johnoon - CHAT) finance Director Brown ooid they are current in their leooen. MOTION. Councilman Ackerly moved, noconded by Councilman Wioo, for approval of the oub-l000e including noeignment for oecurity purp000n. Notion peened by unanimouo conoont. H. REPORTS H-1 City Manager None H-1 City Attorney Atty. Rogero opoke. o. The Roquout for Proponaln for airport conrenotono dtatrlbuted thin dote. There may be name flawo in it, it Mon not boon proof -rood. b. He woo oorvad thin date with litigation regarding Jerry Androwe corporation, he wantu to have the City dell him Sect lot) 36. C. Ha will be attending n nominar in December, and with conoont of Council, will lake o vaebtion. tin would mine the Dec. 21 mooting. Council find no objoctiono. d. Relocation Coots for KgSCO. The infurmntion in the packet indiratoo they are going along with REA. With Council npproval, he will protest. There may be need . lR� •.Li'iful�Leiif��li� 4 CITY (IF KENAI DECEMBER 7, 1901 Page b for executive session, it deals with the financoo of the City. The rolocatiou conto tiro KUSCO now, we have a contend with them that nays they will pay. He will complete thin and the Section 36 matter before he leaves for vacation. He will not intervene at thin time. Council agreed to Atty. Rogura' requent for intervention. H-3 Meyor j None I H-4 City Clerk Clerk Nholon noted the information in the packet regarding the now election proceduroo. The Borough did not charge us for the ballots. H-5 finance Director Nona H-d Planning & Zoning None I H-7 Herber Commtooion Councilmen Ackorly cold i things were diocucoodi - The Public Relations proposal - The lance by Fish Pak - The TANS report Land Manoger Labohn said the fish Pak lease will go to P&Z and back to Council In 2 meetings, Harbor Commission to through with their part. 11-8 Recreation Commission Councilwoman Battle reported the bids regarding the acoustics come in at about $40,000. The Commiaelon thought Me woo too high, they thought they would do 1/2 of it. The gym 10 now at 8, it would bring ltt1.5 thgy can live with 4. Architect G►ntotl explained, tli%o en eol�lninto, j not a bid. The number 8 to the reverberation In seconds. It should be 1.$. it will be 50% effective If they go 50e of the work. The j company has made suggestions no to how to reduce the notes. Aerobics closest; are 5 times a weak, it to d/oturbing. It to the ocho they are concerned with. Council'Womon Bailio cold there to $22,000 in the fund. 11-9 Library Comminnion None I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO DE HEARD None ADJOURNMENT Heet inq%adjourned at 900 PM. Jonet Whelan City Clerk a 1i oil t:.Ir. sent to --N/A _ .�. t1:) Dt 1'rlf:e i of 2 C.O. approved by N A on I ( CHANGE ORDER NO:2 Project KENAI BOAT LAUNCH RA%11' .� Initiation 1);tto 10/21/83 Contractor �c,�..�(ar, Inc, City of Kenai You are hereby roquested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Itom No. Description of changes - quantities, units, unit prices, change in completion schedule, etc. Increase or (Decrease) Remove steel sheeting not shown on plans nor attached breakdown $2627, Jr AS'tP!!O'l D BY Ci'1"r CP MUM -•_•- r :'Y s AVAP,t.t. •»•w,...,»...,,.,.»».r..,.rw �rUuL:". i'!�'��(. ..r:hl..w» � ,Y,3.,� I.I tti�Yf (1(.:r OR1GUiAL COPY TO`..,,...-.,,,.....,,,,»»,.» Net change in contract price due to till:; C.O. $z627-38 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIDIF Original Time 90 Previous C.O.s 0 This Change Order 0 C11: NGH IN CONTRACT AMOUNT Original Contract Amount $218,75O.0O Previous Change Orders 4,025.00 This Change Order 2.r4117-11P itevised Contract Time ._. 21_daya V` •hied ('rn)trc)dt ,lmolint (At Codicil) (Above) is full )uutl[ C-111,+n of eerh I/eA .+n sh+ .:111, In,•In0111r, It's elfrGt no +rtalr.1tinn Ind rl:l{nt:•+11J11;V c..st _, 1•ht+ 4:,0, " not "I" 1811t11-:-,ne,{ by 1-til ilia l-wier III,{ .:mver. E01131 C11V 611,11CIl 1114 to .11.t.r.1Ve .111 � .i1•°. Contraaor's signrture indicates ht+ .o v.r,•,.:10-nt 6err..ith, tnclnJiuy .Inv .1,1111.1MUM in the P..nt+.let sun Ur OFI ra..t t1rw. lice Ilei!:..�•:�L �_ IiV EngIrcl• Coll r.i� t1+r t7: tit r i 1. { t r�-��I''� � :1:1 t c• Mill n o r ... Ic DEL -MAR Incorporated 3008 Highway O North • Wausau. W1 541/101 • (715) 075-7732 November 25, 1983 4-1 m Fo City of Kenaiy P.O. Box 580 rC��ZGd61it 8�� Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attni Keith Kornelis Raj Kenai Boat Launch Ramp Improvomento Dear Keith We have received your letter of November 1, 1983, and hope this will take care of the necessary requirements for our last and final pay estimate. We accept your decision on most of the items mentioned in your letter. Item No. 2, Tragtor Renjfrom Rons Rent It Center, $2,925•0 is based upon 192 hours max mum for monthly rate of $2,925.00. Divide $2,925.00 by 192 hours, = $15.23 per hr• pro rated per hourly - rate. 16 hours X $15.23 Q $243.75• aK On the Boom Truck, our rental agreement with Cherrier and King for use of equipment in the attached statement, please note the $10,000.00 includes the use of 5 items. $10,000.00 divided by 5 equals $2,000.00. Pro -rate $2,000.00 by 30 days = $66.00 per day, divided by 8 hours a $8,33 per hour• We would appreciate consideration for cost of overhead for this additional work, iet insurance etc. It was a pleasure working with you on this pro ect. We met a lot of nice people while in Kenai. Hope we can do t again. Would it be a lot of trouble for you to write a "good -guy' letter for us to send to our bonding company? We would really appreciate it. Thank you. Sincerely, Delmar Becker cY • • • • • • • • • • • 1'AYtIL'N'l'8 OVCIt Sl,OOU.(HI Mu{at pi:gp Cu11NCI1. APPROVA1, tA'I'fINCA'1'ION 12/?.1/U9 /�� + �� ItKgCnit 1'IItY_ I'I{O.I�i( I'/UI{i'AI{'fPll'.N'f A( CInim CIMIUiPn» Alt+ll111'1 , _, 1'+11I - »' ,__ _ _� FOR OPPI{OVAIa i ` TAMt( Hollinucring Servirvn CI'»Unrhur Otudy I:n►;lnuuring 27,010.(I0 i Prufuaulonai Ueatlpt Asuou. loopectien CI' -Airport Ramp Cl'-Terminal Parking Iunpaction inupuctitm 2,04j/.72 i lofs.43 inupectlon I I '1'rnno-Alaaku I:ngtnuuring I:nUlnuurlug Rorvieun CI'-UbS; lmpruv. Study I;nlsivauring jUnl-Mar Filial CI'-Iluat (tome Conatruetlun 2,627.311 ' 1 Nvluun, Wm 6 Assoc. looIcctlon p CP-1u1: h 2nd Sta. Inspection 11,212.60 FOR RATIPICKHONI Ilomur V.lectrlc tlovutnhur P,luctrlclty Ilnul;u Various Vrtrfoun Uti11t1eu litilitiun 18, 3(15. Y8 fi,147.65 NovumLur I:luctririty Unane Walt.•ra 6 Olson Mac. City Insurance Nun-WepartmenUt3 Insurance 3,731.00 - -" Chevron USA t:asulinu Shop Oporsting 4applios 3,42' .3) - Isluu Croon Utte. Medical Insuranca Variuuo iluaith Insurance 16,677.23 Flrat fudural Isank RI:PU 12/9/83 Central Troaeury Central Treanury 500,000.00 9,05% int. I. .. I •, pi a" 1 I i Itl.+1U,: 1'Ilu5; nVI'V 41,n+lu.uu WHICH Cla•.0 CUV;n:11, All Al, 12/21/113 pcniun�_,_, uHa;r.HH1r•rl+,;l ....._ m;I�nlrrrH•,N•r,..._�..=„-.-t!I;i:nHtii:..._-_t,.�.__,. ..nlpnrll•----_ A•I .l.witorMl laoll.urial Cnnlr,uet for Nnu»Hupurtmuntill Ilorvicuu city Admin. IluildinH t/1'1/84 - 6/90/114 a .is . k� i U 1 f ' I - � k= J i. ti Surigaat ed by AdinIOnt rat imi r CITY 01' KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 909-83 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE COIINCIL 01' ME CITY Ill' KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KMC 21.20,270 BY INCRE SING, THE AMOUNT OF INSl1RANCE I.IAf;iLiTY COVERAGE REQUIREDf!Y LE';hLES OF lift. CITY OF KENAI. - - WHEREAS# the minimum limitu prvtsent ly provided by Kt4C 21.20.070(0 are dofsmed inadequate, and WHEREAS, public liability Wourancn limitu of not loon than $3OO,nnO/$1,OOII,000/$7.50,000 are deemed adegsinte at thin time. NOWt THEREFORE, RE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ' KENAI, ALASKA, as followns Sooti�ss, 1s 914C 21,20.070(a) io horcby amended no followns a (a) _ Public liability inaurnnra protecting bath tho City � and/or itu ogente and the leenisa, euch tneurance to be ovidencod by a certificate ahnwinq the insuranco in force. r, l The amount of nuch public liability insurance uholl have llmita not loans than thnasi knumn no $500y00O/sI,Olin, 000/ f►7.5A,OOn r.$250,QOO/bmi,llil0/$Ion ,0001 — PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thin 4th day of January, 19114, TIFFAM( t F1; nT Tf:ST: . ttra snot 17--f'l1, I"tty�(;tcstk.y 0 j Prot Remomis necombi+r 21, 19f13 �Snemid Ileadiur(s January 4, 1904 is f ftor, t s ve 6at r, s f phrunry 4, 19114 F— Made by i Tu MOTIONS Agenda No.s 7- 7:D eAAXYwt N MOTIONS Made by Lj Agenda No.s 4-o mccr i��-- �� -771 rl 1 VV J Suggontod bys Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 910-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING TITLE 22 OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE BY CHANGING PROCEDURES RELATIVE TO THE SALE OF CITY LANDS. WHEREAS, certain provisions; of Title 22 of the Kenai Municipal Code are unclear in defining situations which call for negotiated sale of land or for sale by auction or sealed bids, and WHEREAS, KMC 22.05.030(a) mpecifiou that only the lessee of land with substantial improvements constructed thoreon may initiate the sale of said land, And the Administration believes that this protection should be provided to all lesuees, and WHEREAS, the Administration also believes that any good faith deposit for the purchases of City land should be deposited with the City, and not with a real estate broker. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thats Section 1s KMC 22.05.030(a) is hereby amended as followns 22.05.03U Sales (a) All lands, except tax -foreclosed larida, to which the City of Konai•holds title which are not-reatricted from sale by the Deed of Conveyonce to the City r which have bean ve tnaa.nd from such restrie1.ionn which the City Council has --:�Pdeterrnined as.rt--itrl15required for a public purpose, shall he lialud for solo by the Cit 141111euler, except that lands which have been leaned fAND IIAVE SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED THEREON] shall nut be sold unloso the Lossoe has; made a written requent to the I City to place the land for solo. J i Section 21 KMC 22.05.03(3(b) is hcroby amended as follows$ ' i (b) Srsluts of lands pur-suanl to nuh-section (a) nbovrs may he rnrido at nut Lunn than the fair mrirkest } voluo rsel by an irideprsndent appraisor within six manths of (PRIOR TU] the date of !'sling of application for sole or the date of the ofj:sr or advertinement for sale r d ' m (whichever first occuru), either, nt the option of the City Mnnagor in neeordatico with onll3 roc"dllren not out in this Titles By negettated solo, or (2) By outcry auction to the highest respor►nible bidder, or (3) By competitive sealed bide to the highest responsible bidder. Section 31 KMC 22.05.040(b)(1) is hereby amended as followes i (1) No actions in preparation for sale will be taken f by the City until an agreement to purchase shall be properly executed and filed with the City Manager for the purchase of such land with payment of sufficient good faith deposit M which shall consist of cash or its equivalent kepoeited with [THE REAL ESTATE BROKER, IF ANY, AND IF NONE WITH] the Finance Officer of the City of Kenai, as may be determined by the City ' Manager, to cover all expenses of the City if the ! , applicant subsequently fails to bid or buy the lend and the land is not sold, and such agreement to purchase shall further contain the agreement by applicant to pay any additional costs if said good faith deposit is , insufficient to pay all costs incurred by the City. Section 4s KMC 22.05.040(c) is repealed and re-onacted as follows$ If the 'tract of land proposed to be sold to leased lard upon which substantial improvements have been made, the lessee may, at his request, negotiate the sale of sold land at not lose than the fair market value set by an . independent appraiser within six months of the date of filing of application for sale. Section 51 KMC 22.05.040(d) is repealed and re-onacted as followss If the tract of land proposed to be sold is not lensed land, or is lensed land without substantial improve- mente, then the tract of lard may only be sold by outcry auction or by competitive sealed hide. If the ; tract is to be put up for such competitive auction or sealed bid onto, notice of sale and the manner in which the land is to be sold ahall be published in a news- 1 paper of general circulation within the City once each week for two successive weeks not less than 30 days prior to the date of sales such notice shall also be posted in at least three public places within the City at least 30 days prior to the date of sale, and such other notice may be given by such other means as may be v 2 1r ��,�nnuw a ...�� • .3i.»F»a;�.:iisr �=---- -=-. _ -- -- - - � , . � _ ......:.-,-..-_.•,:—.� _. _. _ � - - considered advisable by the City Manager. Such notice must contains (1) the legal description of the land, 4 (2) a brief physical description of the lend, (3) the area and general location of the land, (4) the minimum acceptable offer for the land (which shall be its appraised fair market value), (5) the terms under which the land will be sold, (6) any limitations on the sale of said land, (7) the time and place set for the auction or bid ? M opening, �fj�J any other matters concerning the sale of which the City Manager believes the public should be informed. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 4th day of January, 1984. 1 TOM WAGONER MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelant Ci y erk i i-• i First Readings December 21, 1983 Second Readings January 4, 1984 Effective Dates 3enoar-r-4, 1904 t c ' � ,. t gym- � (-j�*• - � �:.�, --. - - I } J 3 i l T-- R MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director SUBJECT: Ordinance on land sales DATE: December 12, 1983 The administration is requesting amendments to Title 22 of the City Code. These changes are a result of numerous meetings of the Land Manager, the City Attorney, the City Manager, and myself. Each proposed change is explained below: Section 1 KMKC 22.05.030 (a) 9Ays that,, only the lessee of Of leased land that has substantial improvements on the property may request that the land be sold. We believe that the distinction of improved or unimproved should be deleted. The proposed change would mean that only a lessee of leased land (with or without improvements) may initiate the the sale of the subject land. Section 2 This is just for clarification and does not change the intent of the ordinance. Rection 3 KMC 22.05.040 (b) (1) is being amended to say that the good faith deposit must be deposited with the City, not with the real estate broker. This has, at times, caused confusion upon closing when the City is not sure if a deposit was actually made. There appears to be no reason why all deposits couldn't be made with the City. Section 4 This is the most necessary change being requested. KMC 22.05.040 (c) currently reads: NO If the City Manager knows of no competitive interest in the purchase of the tract of land proposed to be sold and if said tract is not leased land upon which substantial improvements have been made, he mny negotiate the sale of said land n►tly after a one time publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the City Of a neti.ce that it is his intent to sell said tract (giving the legal description thereof) by negotiated sale unless he receives notice of interest to purchase said tract from other parties within seven days after the date of publication of said notice." � - - P - -- - - --- — - - - - - -- - --- - - - --- -- - -- - - - - - ---_ There are two things wrong with the above paragraph: (1) It says the City Manager may negotiate a sale of land if he knows of no competitive interest. In effect, he never knows this. He may not be aware of any interest, or he may believe that there is no interest, but he cannot absolutely know it. (2) It also says that in order to negotiate a sale of land, the land must be "not leased land upon which substantial improvements have been made". Everybody in the City Administration who was here at the time this section was written remembers the City Council instructing the City Attorney to make it possible for a lessee with a building on his lot to buy the land by negotiated sale. The ordinance that was adopted really did the opposite. It says we can negotiate a sale of unimproved leased land (and, the way I read it, probably even unleased land). The language quoted above is clearly wrong. We are requesting that if a lessee has substantial improvements on hie land, then he may buy the land at fair market value by negotiated sale. No determination concerning competitive interest by the City Manager is required. Section 5 The first portion of KMC 22.05.040 (d) reads: "(d) If it appears to the City Manager that more than one party might be interested in the purchase of the tract proposed to be sold and if said tract is not leased land upon which substantial improvements have been made, or if after publishing notice of negotiated sale, the City Manager receives notice from other parties of interest therein, then the City Manager shall put the tract or tracts of land up for sale, at his option, either by outcry auction or by competitive sealed bids." The above language is being changed so that if land is either not leased or is leased without substantial improvements on it, then the land can only be sold by outcry auction or sealed bids. No negotiated sales will be allowed for these types of properties. Again, we're deleting all reference to the City Manager being aware of competitive interest. The City Administration believes that the above changes will make the land sale ordinances easier to implement and will also make them clearer to the administration and public. Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 911-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 KENAI SENIOR CITI7_ENS PROJECT 8Y $160,114. WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has offered the City of Kenai a grant award of $118,511 to cover the project period January 1, 1984 through December 31, 1984, and WHEREAS, the City's required match consists of $18,914 of in -kind support for the calendar year and $2,000 of cash support, which will be appropriated in the City's next fiscal year. WHEREAS, proper accountinq practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by Ordinance. .NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT ORDAINED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: Increase Estimated Revenues - St at e Grant $118,511 Rental - Senior Center (In -Kind) 18,914 Cant ribut ions 15,344 USDA Cash 7.345 Increase Appropriations: Access Services Salaries $ 35,755 Accrued Leave 2,436 PERS 3,772 ESC 1,300 Workmens Compensation 1,848 Health 4,550 Communications 666 Utilities 3,532 Rent (In -Kind) 9,457 Ordinance 911-83 Page 2 Congregate Mealos Salaries $ 26,011 Accrued Leave 19698 PERS 2,737 ESC 946 Workmen's Compensation 1,215 Health 49900 Operating Supplies 289599 Repair 6 Maintenance Supplies 1,000 Communications 666 Utilities 3,533 Rent (In -Kind) 9 457 Home Delivered Mealss = Salaries 4,874 , Accrued Leave . 308 ~ PERS 513 ESC 169 Workmen's Compensation 221 Health 1,050 Operating Supplies 7,151 Repair do Maintenance Supplies 1 77550� PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKAp this 4th day of January, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR I ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk `:-1------ First Reading: December 21, 1983 , Second Readings January 4, 1984 Effective Dates January 4, 1984 e Approved by Finance: i t I t 1 1 I �tlJ!J �t T� . . G--7 Suggeoted by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 912-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND 'APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 "COMMUNITY SEXYXCE PROGRAM" by $5,742. .ct�•vvdgw WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has offered the City of Kenai a grant award of $5,222 to cover the project period January 1, 1984 through December 31, 1984, and i WHEREAS, the City's required match consists of $520 of in -kind support for the calendar year and $60 of cash support, which will be appropriated in the City's next fiscal year. WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all appropriations of City monies be made by Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be modes Increase Estimated Revenues: State Grant $ 5,222 Accounting - In -Kind 520 5L742 Increase Appropriations: Salaries $ 4,818 ESC 167 Workmen's Compensation 237 Profuosional Services (In -Kind) 520 5® PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 4th day of January, 1984. M WAGONER, Of AFTESTs anet Wheran, City lerk First Readings December 21, 1983 Second Readings January 4, 1984 Effective Date: January 4, 1984 Approved by Finances t CITY OF KENAI 1110d Cap" 4 4izaaff P. O. BOX 3E0 KENAI. MASKA 99611 " TELEPHONE 203 • 7535 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council FROM% / Jeff Labohn, Land Manager SUBJECTS Revised Lease Agreement - Ed Lowry - Sprucewood Glen S/D DATES December 16, 1983 Ed Lowry presently has a lease agreement with the City of Kenai for 8.888 acres of city -owned lands within Sprucewood Glen S/D. Mr. Lowry presented a request to Council at the last meeting to separate the original agreement into three individual leases. Administration advised that the request was premature since the subdivision plat had not yet been filed in the Kenai Recorder's Office. The submission and approval of an installation agreement for uncompleted improvements was required of the lessee as a prerequisite to filing the plat. Mr. Lowry has requested the termination of the original lease and the issuance of three separate lease agreements as followss 1) Tract B, Sprucewood Glen S/D 2) Tract C, Sprucewood Glen S/D 3) Tract F; Block 1, Lots 1-6; Block 2, Lots 6-10, Sprucewood Glen S/D. He has requested to purchase the real estate described in lease agreement p3. The subdivision plat has not been filed to date, pending final completion of the installation agreement by the by the lessee. It is anticipated that this will be resolved within the near future, providing for the plat to be filed. The Kenai Adviaory Planning & Zoning Commission discussed this request at their meeting of December 14th. The Commission recommended approval of the petition, subject to the referenced conditions. J JLB%jl CITY OF K NAI I. O. BOX 680 K At, A:A6KA 99611 TILIPM 9 266 . T626 December 16, 1983 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council FROMs Kenai Advisory Planni g 6 Zoning Commission SUBOECTs Lease of Sprucewood lon S/D•by Edwin R. Lowry At the regular meeting of he Planning Commission on December 14, 1983 Councilman Wise gave a report on the meeting of the City Council at which Mr. Lowry appeared. The Commission discussed the proposal ubmitted to both the Planning Commission and to the Council wit Councilman Wise. The Commission passe on the following motion for considerations MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to recommend approval of the three lease per the applicant's request with the atipulatio that, 1) the ROW be platted across Tract F to align ern Avenue, 2) approval of the lease be contingent upon the applicant supporting the rezoning to urban residen al as part of the lease, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTE: Muti n passed unanimously. Submit d at the request of Chairman Lewis jl _ T ' n, December 16, 1983 r CITY OF KENAI „ad (?4� 4 4Za"W „ P. 0. BOX 600 KINAI. ALASKA 99611 TLLHPMON! 203 . 7536 MEMORANDUM TO: Kenai City Council ' FROM: Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Lease of Sprucewood Glen S/D by Edwin R. Lowry At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 14, 1983 Councilman Wise gave a report on the meeting of the City Council at which Mr. Lowry appeared. The Commission discussed the proposal submitted to both the Planning Commission and to the Council with Councilman Wise. The Commission passes on the following motion for considerations I MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to recommend approval of the three leases per the applicant's request with the stipulation that: 1) the ROW be platted across Tract F to align Tern Avenue, 2) approval of the lease be contingent upon the applicant supporting the rezoning of Block 1 & Block 2 in Tract F to urban residential as part of the lease, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTES j Motion passed unanimously. Submitted at the request of Chairman Lewis jl _J • 1 • f,,• rw ....• ••.,� � � .. .. .. .. '" •-�•'-J.•..i.. i.�r .•:. •fY•.. Y:u Y••�f1�S••'rti.: • . •i•• J•. Y�v:.1• .�. _. , .-s.,r-... ..::.. ._ .. ..r.. .............. ... .. .... .. .....'"'...: "Sl.:.•:r`.r A-Ni w...tiii ,....1. -!�'S r•I � .,r '.'vs—'�i",•' � ... (� 1. •. '�/ /L ^::siy��: --.. ..�:;.ii tli�rv�.y� t+3w•*..34 �i L.�:�r.:••i: � �! •.►....::• •�'Swli-�yr•rr•�•.•'•.. .' •t ri• CCF VVV41, Y GY I V - _A'-7 U -c • • �• . •f •. .. • 1 .rr. •. .. •..1..:-• • ..r. •. • • .4 '•-tom . .'GYM --It LSi: r.•, _• •.I• - � "�'�'"•yj1�.M�1• 1 w• • ••► l.rrr•.. r .. .••.Wrr- •s� •*• -- MSY�I.w+A •• w ��r -✓• 1 — r P . IJ •••.•,�:.t;9:tiv.•4�!1iiL'S:�:.J�Y.4•�/.t�tlitf�sl i • ✓nI11' .Ai•p,./•,eYr4y.•. '.N•'.•Y.IM•:y i C, R BALDWN .ow4:10 �•w.r« ter.._. .wr ..._—�... .� II �, , I ASSIGHMEHT OF LEASE THOMAS M. ACKERLY and PATRICK M. O'CONNELL of Kenai, Alaska, hereinafter referred to as the Assignor, for TEN DOLLARS and for other valuable considerations, do hereby assign and transfer to PENINSULA DAIRY QUEEII, an Alaskan partnership, comprised of Thomas M. Ackerly, Patrick M. O'Connell and Blair Jones, whose address is P.O. Drawer M, Kenai, Alaska, hereinafter referred to as the Assignee, all of their interest in the below -described Lease, with the City of Kenai as Lessor: Lease recorded in Book 128 at Page 929; Tract B, Kenai Spur Airport Lease Property, filed in the Kenai Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. To have and to hold the same from the date hereof for and during all of the remainder yet to come of the term of said Lease agreement. IN WITIIESS WHEREOF, the said Assignors have hereunto set/ their hands and Beals this day of 1-c a c/alLtG� 1983. TIIO14AS 14. ACKERLY 1 ATRICK M. U'COUNL• L STATE OF ALASKA ) THIRD JUDICIAL DIS1ItICT ) ilil:L I': To CERTIFY III d 1:clore "ie, the undersigned, I! a flotary Public to and for I.ho :hate of Alaska. duly ;� gym.^.nts:::urt••1 .,n.l ..,;orn as; >.u.h. 1"'r••cm:11)v appoared THO••:AS M. ACKERLY, kn�wrt to Ine .uur to i.%! I:n,+::n 1 u be the identia.il ,I Individhral n•a•i.•.l in .m,f :,110 • ...•rn: ••d the al,s;ie. and fortygoing In ,Ire:...• nt , r•I ::no .t• I:r:.rll• •fa•••1 + :,.• flt.t% In: _:itfnctf and !I •••I Lit '.I .V. It frt•.• .,r. f :olunt�ry .rCt attd daed. for i i p Pale Ot.ae, i,SSI L..:EGT CF LEASE a � of i the uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. s a»+s•�rt ::� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this day of NoTAR PUBLIC FOR ALASKA My Commission Expires: f?-11h - STATE OF ALASKA ) ' _ THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that before me, the undersigned, " a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly Commissioned and sworn as such, personally appeared PATRICK •. M. O'CONNELL, known to me and to me known to be the identical individual named in and who executed the above and foregoing "`: �•.,-.r :°.- .� •'•,JJ. instrument, and who acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this '{43 day of e� .. .. `. ` / OTN ARY PUBLIC FOR ALASKA My Commission Eypiress 1��yIi7 • r I • C.R.BALDMN Page Two, A.SSICNIZIT OF LEASE ' • O NtNN NNAVA i+M o0011 �i I it M } 1-• I f f- —�I• + _ '.:J.L_ , � .�i�+wu-a.'� _ ;�.-i-as.=..+:«... ;-�s?i.ur:..=: '. _ -- �r�..�.: _- ::n,�rcx,: —_ - `—:=,y^ �. w CITY OF KENAI CONSENT TO SUBLEASE OR ASSIGI114ENT The Assignment from THOMAS M. ACKERLY and PATRICK M. O'CONNELL to PENINSULA DAIRY QUEEN, a partnership comprised of Thomas M. Aekarly, Patrick M. O'Connell and Blair Jones, dated , covering the following -described property: Tract B. Kenai Spur Airport Lease Property IiJ hereby ACKNOWLEDGED AND APPROVED, subject to the same terms and conditions as contained in the original Lease above -described. This Consent is given by the City of Kenai without waiving any right or action, or releasing the Assignor from any liability or responsibility under the aforementioned Lease, and does not relieve the Assignee from the condition requiring the City approval for any subsequent sublease or assignment. CITY MANAGER STATE OF ALASKA ) )s8. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) On this day of before me personalTy appeared , known to be the parson who executod the above instrument, and acknowledged that he (she) had the authority to sign, for the purposes stated therein. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR A ASKA My Commission Expires: C. R BALOWIN .. •• row,.ua KIM A"WA 92*n •Nr J.! I„ • J i •�J (;-! a CITY OF KIENAI Goa ' .al 4 4Z"4a„ P. O. BOX EEO KENAI, ALASKA 99611 - ' TELEPHONE 9E3 . 753E MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council FROM, eff Labahn, Land Manager SU83ECTs Concept Lease Applications Kenny Carver - Unsubdivided City Lands Adjacent to Lot 1, Block 5, C.I.I.A.P. S/D DATE: December 16, 1983 Kenny Carver owns and operates Carver Drilling Co. & Sons on Lot 10 Block 5, Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park S/D. Mr. Carver wishes to lease an adjacent parcel of unsubdivided city land to the west (approximately 5000 sq. ft.) to expand his existing operation. The proposed use of the lease area is for parking, storage, etc. The requested lease property is neit.,or platted or released for non -aviation use by the F.A.A. Therefore, pending Council approval of the concept lease application, these matters will need to be addressed prior to executing a final lease agreement. The Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the concept lenses application at their meeting on December 14th. Their positive recommendation is attached. JBLsj1 t. CITY OF KENAI %Od Cap" aj 4"" F. O. OOK 600 KONAI, AtA6KA 99611 1411/"ONO 100 - 7636 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council FROMs Kenai Planning do Zoning Commission Janet Loper# Secretary SUBJECTs Recommendations Concept Lease Application for Mr. Kenny Carver At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 14, 19639 the Commission made the following motions MOTIONS Commissioner Smalley, seconded by Commissioner Zubeck moved approval of the concept lease application of Lot 1, Block S CHAP S/D to Kenny Carver. VOTES Motion passed with unanimous roll call vote The Commission reviewed the zoning and the intended use and recommended that no buildings be placed on the lot and that a sight obscuring fence be put up around the property. Submitted at the request of Chairman Lewis jl (7' �.J 1 r•On CITX USE7 ONLY cost*RecotVW ,�2• A '�r" CITY OF KENAI �Q y :: � e= P.O. BOX 580 • KENAL ALASKA • PHONE 283.7535 i O { f �LEASE APPLICATION r O Name of Applicant r0 A/ Business Name and Address '0. Kenai Peninsula Borough Sales Tax No. (if applicable) State Business License No. _ (if applicable) Telephone 7�� Lot Description/�.F�r..Q.•+�C-J/� a All: , Desired Length of Lease Property to be used for Our Description of Developments (typo, construction, size, etc.) Attach development plan to scale (1" s 501), showing all buildings planned. Time Schedule for Proposed Development: Beginning Date Proposed Completion Date Estimated Value of Construction $ G Dote s /01'.e., • 5 igned: Date: Signed: t .Z!L 0 t"4? AC too x /ago I I CURB " • $TOP$ MATCH 1- 41 Ul 7 - , i••k�eill�i� �--ty CITY OF KENAI „Oil G?apiW 4 44a4d " P. O. BOX 6B0 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TRIPNONE 403 • 7638 December 139 1983 !Os Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager FROM: Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works SUBJ : Discussion Item for Council Meeting of December 219 1983, Intersection Illumination I have compiled a list of street light illumination at intersections requested by various Council Members and Citizens. At the Council meeting of November 16, there was a discussion item on street lights; and at the next meeting of November 30, in the informational portion of the packet, there was a letter to the State Department of Transportation requz.-ting intersection illumination at four intersections along the Kenai Spur Highway. I have not received a response as yet from my November 23 letter to the State Department of Transportation. The City of Kenai has received the following costs from Homer Electric Association to activate and install street lights. 1. First Avenue and Main Street Loop; Barnacle and Main Street Loop $ 3,730.00 2. Strawberry Road and the Spur 1,920.00 3. Eagle Rock Road and the Spur 1,203.00 4. Togiak Street and the Spur 731.40 5. Lupine Avenue and the Spur' 025.00 $ 8,409.40 Since these street liglits were recently requested, they were not included in this year's budget. Therefore, if the City decides to have HEA make.these street light installations, the Council will need to transfer funds to cover the costs. KK/jet Attachments L i 1�rf a,:_'� a 7F3axsiel• ZE3�ctn•ic �l�sr�csci�,�ioaiz, 7[rac. P.O. SOX 353 99669 DISTRICT OFFICE r- October 19, 983 • •O City or Kenai '.. 21..0 Fidalgo ::• ' Kenai, Ak. 9S611 _ Re: 216-r_et LiOt at Corner of'Firs , Avenue and Main ;tr eet Corner of Barnacle and ,•lair. Street Loop Dear ;r. Kornelis: Ir response to your letter dated October 6,1983, requesting a cost estivate for installing the lights at the corner of First Avenue and Main Street, and the corner of Barnacle and Main. Street Loop is $3,730.00. y If you wish to proceed., please come in and fill out the application for the above. ® If I cen be of any assistance, please contact me at the Ridgeway Office. Sincerely, I HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. di Vaen�� Ilicgev:ay D•istricl, Distribution Engineer . L.. dl ORB/J jW .... � Xf I I , I I- f . J f. . rry S � I ,,W -ectric A1%e3oaiat1on, 3rac. till)' 310 [I i:JI.0 :TfJA'.L %.'iK�. 9)�i89 tt 262�Sd3i n DISTRICT OFFICc � October ;9. 1983 + •w Wzl City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo ,;,, ,:��"� "•` � Kenai, Ak. 99611 Re: Street Light at Intersection 'of ••Strawberry Road and Spur Dear hir. Kornelis: In response to yotir letter dated September 23, i983. requesting a - cost estimate for installing a light at the intersection of Straw- berry Road and Spur is $1,920.00. a If you wish to proceed, please come in and fill out the application for the above. - if I can be of any assistance, please contact me at thv Ridgeway Office. Sincerely, ; HOMER ELECTRIC A.SSOCIAT:OI, INC. Devid R. Barden Ridgeway District Distribution Engin2nr DRBi f jw ' I�IMA��5�, �^- -—�x-.;;:..,�..�r.�:.c..:�x.'a:�c.�r..� - - �c.=.z:rc.- �E..�s��-=---�a;�r..___�.-t,'•� " � - — -- - - �' File. No. HOMER ELECTRIC,ASSOCIATION,•1NC. 1,'.. 0. Boxy' 350 W.O: No. Soldotna,•Alacka 99669 Date_ December 9. 19R3 K Attention: Keith Kornelis Member 6370 f`f ��' '�• �- f` TO: City of Kenai / •• �Er.�' 3 Departmentof P0511c ors { ;,kc�.ti•, �u 210 Fidaloo St. City of K"ynat Kenai , Ak . 99611 T r ��h;t, s I Dear Sir: ; At your request, we have inspected the electrical facilities at I Pole No. , and offer the following quotation of costs to provide the changes you desire. The changes are: Install & Activate Street Light Near Intersection of Ea le Rock i Road and the Spur High way. { I - • The cost to you to do the above will be $1 203.00 and is based upon our completing the work in one trip. This quotation s valid r for 90 days from above date. If you wish to proceed, please sign in the space provided at the bottom of this letter. The quoted amount is due PRIOR to consturction.(, I at Sincerely yours, " - NO R ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. f David R. Barden i Ridgeway District Distribution Engineer TO: HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. P. 0. Box 350 Soldotna, Alaska 99669 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith is remittance in the amount of $ which is required for doing the work outlined above. Please. c—o—n Tsf Ter thhIs your notice to proceed. Sincerely yours, X 1. 4 i e,•-No. _.._.r HOMER ELECTRIC ,ASSOCIATION,, INC. W.O. No: P. 0. Box'350 ' -- Soldo•tna,-ATacko'99669 Date December 9. 1983 ' ' ,^ 1 i Attention: Keith Kornelis �`� f{► ''- City of Kenai , Member H 6370 r •%C jgo 210 F1da ao St. �° Ate Kenai, Kon+� Ln C,f,1�1 UWL Dear Sir: on 90 c - Pole At Yyour request, we have No. KF6/31/0779 inspected the electrica i<� t i� �`@s at provide and offer the following quotation ofT&11ts to the changes you desire. The changes are: .'. Install & Activate Street Light Near Intersection of -- Uninle CIPW-007 nnn Cnizm .. ,.m., The cost to you to do the above will be $ 731.40 and is based upon our completing the work in one trip. This quotat on s valid for 90 days from above date. If you wish to proceed, please sign in the space provided at the ,bottom of this letter. The quoted amount is due PRIOR to consturction. Sincerely yours, HOf LECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. I X David R. Barden Ridgeway District Distribution Engineer TO: HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. P. 0. Box 350 Soldotna, Alaska 99669 Gentlemen: i Enclosed herewith is remittance in the amount of $ ! which is required for doing the work outlined above. Please consider t s your notice to proceed. Sincerely yours, X L I, fi 1 e., No. HOMER ELECTRIC ,ASSOCIATION,, 'INC.' �.� P. CU. Box'350 W.O. No: Sol dotna, •Alaska '99669 Date December 9, 1983 Attention: Keith Kornelis Member N 6370 G TO: Cif of Kenai • �'•� r. hFC 19 F1dal o St. �tCENtn Kenai-, Ak. 99611 <<, ��tJ of KgnGcw� —";a .. pub11C Wotkg , Dear Sir: c� i At your request, we have inspected the electrica::f..aci.lities at Pole No. G6 6/10-1 and offer the following quotation of costs to i provide t e c anges you desire. The changes are: Install b Activate Street Light Near Intersection.of Lupine Avenue an Spur g way. i - i Ii The cost to you to do the above will be $ 825.00 and is based upon our completing the work in one trip. This quotation —Fs valid ' for 90 days from above date. i If you wish to proceed, please sign in the space provided at the ! bottom of this letter. The quoted amount is due PRIOR to consturction.! Sincerely yours, HO R LECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. R �o Dav d R. Barden Ridgeway District Distribution Engineer TO: HOMER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. ' P. 0. Box 350 Soldotna, Alaska 99669 ;.; Gentlemen: ! Enclosed herewith is remittance in the amount of $ which is required for doing the work outlined above. Please consider this • your notice to proceed. Sincerely yours, X T11, 1 CITY OF KENAI 'Old Car" of 4"" P. O. BOX $00 KENAI. ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 203 • 7335 November 22, 1983 Homer Electric Association Box 350 Soldotna, Alaska 99669 ATTNs Dave Barden Dear Mr. Bardens The Council of the City of Kenai has requested that I investigate the possibility of installing street lights in the following intersections: J • 1) Eagle Rock Road and Kenai Spur Highway T 2) Togisk Street and Kenai Spur Highway 3) Lupine Avenue and Kenai Spur Highway Would you please give me H.E.A.'s cost to install and activate each individual light listed above. + Sincerely, / 01. Keith Kornelis, Director Department of Public Works KK/ j el lk 1 C e-� CITY OF KENAI „ Del Cap" 4 4"„ F. O. EOK SSG KENA1, A:ASKA 99611 TELEPHONE SES • 7635 MEMORANDUM TO: William J. Brighton, City Manager 'ROM: eff Lobahn, Land Manager SUBJECT: Assumption of Zoning Powers DATE: December 19, 1993 Mayor Wagoner raised the issue of assumption of zoning powers when he addressed the Kenai Advisory Planning do Zoning Commission last month. Realizing that this topic hoe been discussed before and will probably resurface in the future I would like to convey several thoughts on the subject. 1) Cost The actual cost to administer the zoning power will be directly related to the level of commitment made by an individual municipality. for example: the City of Homer hired a planner analyst who devotee half of her time to zoning administration. Actual administrative coats are offset by application and processing fees. To date the City of Homer is the only municipality in the Borough to assume the zoning powers. 2) Impacts j o. The City Council instead of the Borough Assembly would be responsible for authorizing amendments to the City of Kenai Zoning Ordinance and map. The processing time for a rezoning application would be 1 i reduced from the present 2 1/2 to 3 months to approxi- mately half this time period. b. Exercise of "Local Control" would be greater if the City assumed the zoning power. c. The City of Kenai, instead of the Kenai Peninsula Borough would be responsible for processing all ' rezoning requests, i.e., receipt of application Pee, legal advertisement, certified mailings, etc. d. Additional administrative effort would be required from the planning & zoning commission secretary, city attorney, and land manager There are other existing concerns which will also need to be addressed, for example, delegation of the zoning powers to the city would result in a separation of planning and zoning administration. The Alaska statutes still provide for the retractment of the delegation of zoning power to a city if it is ' ordained by the Borough Assembly. I would strongly recommend that the City of Kenai examine all - these issue prior to making a determination of whether or not to assume the zoning power. I aorprepared to discuss pros and cons ' of this issue in detail if there is further interest in this ' matter. n •• 3BLtjl i 1 `Y i i as ._ KENAI POLICE DEPT. P.O. BOX 3173, KENAI, ALASKA 88811 TELEPHONE 263.7870 TOs William Brighton, City Manager n�/ FROM Richard Ross, Chief of Police (�J�, SUBJECT: Temporary Hire - POLICE AIDE RE: Enforcement of New Ordinance DATE: 12-15-83 PROPOSAL: Request that the Police Department be authorized to hire a Temporary Hire dur- ing the period June 1 - August 31, 1984. This would be a non-commissioned per- son who would be limited as to enforcement authority. The position would be a Pay Grade 3. PURPOSE: The position would be utilized to perform the following functions: 1. Enforce ordinance prohibitting unauthorized camping. This would consist of advising people about ordinance, issuing citations for non-compliance, and assisting police if further enforcement was necessary. 2. Assist in enforcement of parking ordinances in areas where regulatory post- ing is present. This would consist of citation and/or impound. 3. Enforcement of off -road vehicle ordinance in subdivision areas, parks, and beach area. This would include informational warnings and citations. 4. Provide other assistance as needed where task does not require a fully trained commissioned individual. JUSTIFICATION: 1. The specific areas of enforcement the position is requested for were addressed in ordinance form in the Fall of this year. They are high visibility areas of Community concern. Members of Council at time of passage inquired concerning enforcement capabilities. It was suggested at that time that additional full- time Police manpower would most likely not be necessary, but that the type of enforcement envisioned in this proposal would be suggested. 2. The areas of enforcement are highly visible, primarily "nuisance", areas of Community concern. During the summer months the complaint, call response, and case investigation load of the Department are such that these areas cannot re- ceive the priority attention they should. Present manning is not capable of handling the initiation of enforcement in these areas during the comming sum- mer without reducing service delivery in the other areas outlined. POSITION QUALIFICATION: The position would be non-commissioned, unarmed, with limited enforcement author- ity. Specific authority and training would be directed at three areas of primary concentration. Specfic qualifications are as follows: -2- POSLTION QUALIFICATION COI TINUGD 1. Over 18 years of age and of mature character. A satisfactory background that would allow him to represent the City of Kenaf in this capacity. 2. Familiar with the streets, residential, and park areas within the City of Kenai. It is anticipated that one or more college students from our area, that are educating and training themselves for future law enforcement careers, would be interested in applying for this type of position for summer employment. I PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: M, 1. This position would be full-time, temporary. It would be set at Pay Grade 3. Salary pnd benefits available to temporary hire would be under $1600.00 for month of June, July and August costs would be adjusted based on pay schedules in effect. 2. Uniforms and associated equipment are estimated as costing under $300.00. 3. A vehicle for use should be a pick-up, praferrably four-wheel drive if beach enforcement is to be effective. The vehicle could be a surplus one, or loan from another department within the city, or a rented or leased one. A police unit would not be appropriate because of the limited enforcement role of the position versus public expections if a police unit were used. 4. Source of vehicle acquisition is not known at present. If leased from a lo- cal rental agency it would be under $2,000.00 for the three month period. SOURCE OF FUNDS 1. June's salary could be funded out of present police budget. July and August would be part of FY 85 appropriations. 2. Uniforms and related expensem could be funded out of present police budget. 3. If vehicle is a rental it is projected that within present budget funds could be located for June's rental. 4. Total funding necessary is estimated at under $7,500.00 CC: FINANCE �a —• •'t. . • f/ N, 4WW PHIL N. NASH P.O. Box 4084 Kenai, Alaska 99611 C: Cj9� n ,y r. n W ti s��ac.�eo�6Z Dear Municipal Clerks Please accept my apologies that this must be a form letter, but the potential addressees are too great for my secretary's correcting typewriter. ' The Kenai Peninsula Bar Association has requested me, as a borough assembly member, to sponsor a resolution before our as- sembly on January 17th, to require Alaska Legal Services Corpor- ation to establish one full-time and two part-time offices within the Kenai Peninsula Borough, with appropriate full and part-time staff to provide meaningful legal services for indigent Alaskans in at least the areas of domestic relations, debtor -creditor relations, landlord -tenant and small estate and probate, or elim- inate their state funding! As a lawyer engaged primarily*in a family law practice, a borough assembly member, a past administrator of the state child support agency, and a former realty specialist for the Juneau office of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, I recognize the vital role that Alaska Legal Services has previously fulfilled in represent- ing indigent Alaskans. Now that the Native Allotment problems are nearing resolution, however, I am informed that the Corporation appears to have lost sight of those historic goals in its present quest for notoriety through litigation involving spectacular class actions and suits against municipalities, settlement act corpora- tions and the federal government. For the last several years the Kenai Peninsula Bar Associa- tion has actively pursued commitment from the Corporation to pro- vide meaningful legal services for indigent Alaskans in this borough, culminating with the hosting of their last annual direc- tors' meeting, which included housing the delegates (I housed two). The Corporation responded by sending a representative to the Kenai-Soldotna area once or twice a month to write wills for the senior citizens and similar non -controversial activities! As a delegate to the 1983 Alaska Municipal League Conference in Juneau last month, I was pleased to he able to spark suffi- cient interest in the problem among delegates from this borough for them to lead an opposition which resulted in the defeat of an additional funding resolution for the Corporation. My consti- tuates advise me, however, that more positive action is needed. 1 ., Page Two Enclosed is a proposed resolution which supports the con- ditioning of future state funding of Alaska Legal Services Corpor- ation upon their providing full-time services within the Kenai Peninsula which may be used as a guide should any of your council members choose to sponsor such a resolution before your local municipal legislative body. (They may, of course, choose to change the distribution provided in Section 3, or the substantive pro- visions of other sections.) I would appreciate receiving a photocopy of any such resolu- tion adopted in your jurisdiction. , Thank you for your consideration and assistance. Sincerely, j Phil N. Nash j 1 � '1 t� i� k. 1, c f . i 19 Introduced by: Date: Vote: Action: MUNICIPALITY OF RESOLUTION 84- CONDITIONING ALL FUTURE STATE FUNDING OF THE ALASKA LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION UPON THE ESTABLISHMENT AND STAFFING OF OFFICES WITHIN THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, WHEREAS Alaska Legal Services Corporation has consistently despite representations to the contrary, refused to provide mean- ingful legal services for indigent residents of the Kenai Peninsula for many years; and WHEREAS Alaska Legal Services Corporation has repeatedly acknowledged the substantial need, but has continually ignored the yearly requests of the Kenai Peninsula Bar Association to establish and staff offices within the Kenai Peninsula Borough to provide meaningful legal services for indigent residents of the Kenai Peninsula; and WHEREAS the delegates from the various municipalities of the Kenai Peninsula Borough to the 1983 Annual Conference of the Alaska Municipal League led the opposition which resulted in the defeat of a resolution for additional Binding for the Corporation because the.Corporation was not providing meaningful legal services for indigent Alaskans statewide including the Kenai Peninsula; and WHEREAS the Kenai Peninsula Borough is the third or fourth major population center within the State of Alaska with approxi- mately 35,000 residents and 19 incorporated and unincorporated cities and villages; and WHEREAS the indigent residents of the Kenai Peninsula need meaningful legal representation particularly in the areas of domes- tic relations, debtor -creditor relations, landlord -tenant and small estate probate; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MUNICIPALITY OF Section 1. That the Second Session of the Thirteenth legis- lature anal future legislatures of the State of Alaska and the Honorable Govenor William Sheffield and all future govenors make the FY 1984 and all future appropriations of state funding for Alaska Legal Services Corporation upon the condition that prior .to July 1, 1984, the Alaska Legal Services Corporation establish and staff, and continuously maintain thereafter, the following offices, which shall provide and thereafter continue to provide meaningful legal services, including representation in litigation, i in at least the areas of domestic -relations, debtor -creditor rela- tions, landlord -tenant and small estate and probate, for indigent i residents of the Kenai Peninsula Borough as follows: a) Offices with a listed telephone number, physical location and mailing address within the Kenai Peninsula Borough in at least the communities of Seward, Homer and the Kenai-Soldotna area; j b) Not less than two full-time attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Alaska; c) Not less than one fall -time intake/secretarial position for the Kenai-Soldotna office and not less than one half-time intake/secretarial position for each of the Seward and Homer i offices. d) Allocation of sufficient travel and operating funds to adequately provide said legal services in all three of those muni- cipalities within the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Section 2. That all of the above services, positions and travel unds may be provided by transfers of funds and positions, but not necessarily the transfer of actual staff, from other exist- ing offices, without the necessity of creating additional positions or funding, preferably by transfer from other areas of the state where the Corporation is no longer devoting primary consideration to providing legal services to indigents. Section 3. That the clerk shall provide copies of this Resol- ution t� o Honorable William Sheffield; Senate President, Jay Kerttula; the Speaker of the House, Joe Hayes; Senate Finance Co -Chairmen, Don Bennett and John Sackett; House Finance Chairman, Albert Adams; Chairman House Judiciary Committee, Charley Bussell and Senate Judiciary Committee, Bill Ray; Senators Don Gilman and Paul Fischer; Representatives Hugh Malone, Bette Cato and Milo Fritz; and Lisa Rudd, Commissioner of Administration. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF THIS i day of January, 1984. , Council President ATTEST: Municipal Clerk It C1!Y V K(-,A, nv IN THE DISTRICT couity rn'R ;fir StAll: OF ALAIVA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT MY Of KENAI, rJT.rT) fit the Tdal Cotirli Stuto of Al;ls!;.,, '11-ird Mulct Plaintiff, at Kenai nrC 1933 EDWARD AMBARIAN, —Clurk Derandant. I eptity Caae No. 3KN 83-199 C1. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Def undont 'a Motion to St rt ko Notice of A AP- 1 fort. elturo ia:heruby danied.1 -Z DATED at Kenai, Alaska, thir, 7Uday of 1983. Judo V - 7, If(. e0i U LA:�tm,-,w 41111► A, e. Ct m - ma o-1 ✓"Lo /I t1j"tt v ro 04. V,11)df Rep S A40; 5, d 9. Tht? court in not or rejv,:t;inrj m-t, vt!j,ri-::ontaUon--1 of fact alleged itt the "Of-iCu or ruliwf on thm proprioty or validity of notickt. Cl'.0 Ly nh A. A 7. f A.. , 1. -, • 4 ROO : some' WP- ,v: U— 0 1M �rr.rrofetr :STY OF KENAI . o too M t CITY 0f KENA1, ) lNr" Plaintiff, ) •• I MUD In the Tr)al Cnurts vs. State of Alaska, '"IIIA District EDWARD AF18ARlA%, ,;t'�"t / At KPn:1i ►';. DEC ! 1983 Case No. 3KN 84-199 Cl. Y lf-----Clerk �-- ...Deputy ORDER Hevinq considered the pieabinga,'the'memoranda, and affidavits, it to hereby ordered that Sum' ary Judgment be granted in Plaintiff's rover, ordering the re Aef'requested and dismissing Defendant's Counteeclatm. •}X-. DATED at Kenai, AlaAa, thin dey of IL-11 , 1983. u�tti L C-111n! ES 1 . C .A. "I —1k eel V IWU 6'� eA1j_1 nn4s__ `4Ct�c�vt1- %a aM c.0 #� -�-P C 0-1 u �/ �' i �� t 1 S c�wwQa� c i�t r t,a 'W t�c� �ylw 11G %4-s Fo nn w_ n/j 4(�j ` , *Defendant has failed to offer anything but mere denials or allegations to counter the assertion in plaintiff's motion, supported by affidavit, that rent in the amount of $5,952.10 Ls duo palintiff as of October 31, 1983. In :such circumstances summary judgment is appropriate, Civ. R. 5(c), millor v. city • of Fairbanks, 509 P.2d 826 (Alaska 1973). Moreover, as a matter of law there is no basis for judgment in favor of defendant on his counterclaim and no genuino issue of material fact exists as to it. Plaintiff shall prepare final judgment. CKC by nh r `0 / r r—O w P� , William D. McCool Attorney at Law _ Suite 320, Drumheller Building Walla Walla, Washington 99302 • (609) 626.2630 December 9, 1983 ..: _ysy� Timothy J. Rogers, Esquire / " • y...�.r,riv:nii,r�►:iril City Attornoy City of Kenai �j ' ,• :::�. -: -. Kenai, Ax 99611 Res A.C.I. v. City of Kenai Bear Tims Enclosed please find a stipulation for dismissal of this action. You may recall earlier that you had offered $500.00 in exchange for dismissal of claims and sinning +: of a release. ror various reasons, Mr. Eitol did not t" wish to sign the release an you had drafted it. t (' In any event, it is my view that a dismissal with prejudice should at this point accomplish the name goals as a release ' since the statute of limitations will have clearly run on any matters for which Mr. Ri.tel would desire any possiblo litigation. i When you have executed the stipulation, I would appreciate it if you would eithor file the original and send a copy ' :_.-.•.-» -• »«.+., ,..++ —.+ .�.•.e to me, or send Lho original to me and I will file it. ! .. Sincerely yours, { William B. McCool -- - - 11*13M/mf — t:nclu. '.. cc: Client ` File • •f er1': �'•e%�'— ter: "Y!— r •II t 1 - i .• t 0 •y I • i •.•iILLIAM a. McCOOL . �norcgnw vo ne."3 . uw "9411 - � �noW.+rweWwq 1NWYYIY w�MA! I l4, r IN THE SUPt:RIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT KENAI AVIATION CONSULTANTS, INC., ) Plaintiff, 1 ) NO. 3KN-79-233 Civil Vs. ) STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM CITY OF KENAI, ) Defendant. ) ) COME NOW A.C.I., Inc., by and through William D. McCool, and the City of Kenai, by and through Timothy J. Rogers,' pursuant to Civil Rule 41 and stipulate to a dismissal of plaintiff's claim and defendant's counterclaim, with prejudice. 2' Cf-gJ Dateds Da William-D. Mccool I �- •T mq _Rogers Attorney for A.C.I., Inc. Ate noy for City of Kenai �wnciaru�wawxwsn+�uisu>to�s>ss�.. '� '• Fo -_3 '. V I7 l Ii i i Xvzai donz►nu►zlt y -fig tat y A PUBLIC LIBRARY IN SERVICE SINCE 1949 SOX 157 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 1983 r ulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books Fiction 1128 306 761 Non -Fiction 1529 161 89 Total Book Circulation 3974 Films, Phonodiscs, Pamphlets, Periodicals 450 Total Circulation 4424 Additions Adult Juvenile Easy Books AV Total Gifts 161 3 42 6 212 Purchases 248 10 14 1 273 Total Additions 485 ' Remedial and Reworked Books Adult Juvenile Easy Books Total 87 57 11 19 Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned Books 16 34 33 AV 15 15 17 Interlibrary Loans'by our -Library 62 Volunteers , Number 123 Total Hours 386.75 . Income Fines and Sale Books 1428.85 Lost or Munared Books 50.73 Xerox 195.75 Donations 10.70 Total Income for November, 1983....$686.03 Y .n __ T4 r� KENAI COtrAMITY LIBRARY Libary Cards Issued..November, 1983 Kenai 120 Cooper Landing 1 Homer 2 Kasilof 7 Ninilchik 1 North Kenai 3 Soldotna 40 Sterling 4 Total Cards Issued 17$ V V 2 1 r 1 ej � 4 r .. r ti �%� 1 '` L ti,� ��j 1°'� 3 rr TIPPETTS ABBETT-McCARTHY-STRATTON "cam; •� :; ` a ISLUMONU c011MR4170v mac., r-�►� �r i I•nrnvxlrx " N. Vile City of Kenai Post Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 �r. Attentions Mr. William Brighton �`'1��! December 9, 1983 City Manager `'"i° '�""�"fit' ' Invoice 150-3 f r Engineering Services - Financial Analysis and Outline Design Study - Per Agreement approved on May 31, 1983. Periods October 1983 { Task 1 - Demand Analysis & Facility Inventory - $18,700.00 - 200% Complete $1811700.001/ � Less Previous Billing 16,830.00 ✓ , 1,870.00 $ 1,870.00 Ir !` Task 2 - harbor Functional Requirements - $8,000.00 90% Complete $ 7,200.00 Less Previous Billing 4,800.00 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 a' Task 3 - Environmental Review - $11,000.00 ✓ 15% Complete $ 1,650.00 Task 4 - Conceptual Design Alternatives - $36,600.00 ✓ i; 80% Complete $29,280.00 - , Less Previous Billing 21,960.00 J 7,320.00 $ 7,320.00 Task 5 - Preliminary Cost — —; Estimate - $8,500.00 + 70% Complete y 5,950.00 � Less Previous Billing 1,700.00 4,250.00 $ 4,250.00 Y i 4,191 BUSINESS PARK BOLLLV.1KU. bUITE ONE r ANCliORACE. ALASKA 09503 r TELEPHONE (907) 502.21322 . 4...:. . 1 s I Mr. William Brighton - 2 - Task 6 - Financial/Benefit Invoice 150-3 Analysis - $20,100.00 50% Complete $10,050.00 Less Previous Billing 4,020.00 6,030.00 $ 6,030.00 Task 7 - Analysis of Preferred Alternative - $15,400.00 ✓ 30% Complete $ 4,620.00 Task 8 - Report Reproduction - 027,300.00 10% Complete $ 1,730.00 Total This Invoice . . . . . . . . $29,870.00 TIPPETTS-ABBETT-MaCARTFIY-STRATTON A Professional Corporation Attachment '..A (/ •: i Summary :," ".:�^ ::".......,............. kG''. ..... 3 s. . +iti/1iia�.i{a�a��,..�v�`i�il�.. �,t�6� ate. _ ,,:�:,;7�• ��,.>.-.�:.n ;r t KENAI HARBOR - FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND OUTLINE DESIGN October 1983 150-3 Period: Invoice too. ,k n. Description Budget Total t0 Previous invoice Expenditure ThILS Month Total To Date., —' 2 B 1. Demand Analysis and Facility Inventory 18,700 90 _ 16,830.00 10 1,870.00 Ion 18,700.00 2. Harbor Functional Requirements 81000 60 4,800.00 30 2,400.00 90 7,200.00 3. Environmental Review 11,000 0 15 1,650.00 15 1,650.00 4. Conceptual Design Alternatives 36,600 60 21,960.00 20 7,320.00 80 29,280.00 S. Preliminary Cost Estimate 8,500 20 1,700.00 30 4,250.00 70 5,950.00 6. Financial/Bonefit Analysis 20,100 20 4,020.00 :30 6,030.00 50 10,050.00 7. Analysis of Preferred Alternative 15,400 0 :30 4,620.00 30 4,620.00 8. Report Production 17,300 0 10 1,730.00 10 1,730.00 Totals $135,600 37 49,310.00 :12 29,870.00 58 79,180.00 . i i 4 i i i� i- r. ILL_ _E. -r I CITY OF KENAI -0d eap4W 4 44;&4a" P. O. !OK S00 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 203 • 1535 MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown DATE: December 8, 1983 SUBJECT: Review of ballot of 1972 bond election Resolution #71-12 is the resolution passed by Council that authorized the sale of bonds for tits Civic Center Complex, fire and police building, and other improvements. Section 3 of that resolution reads, in part: "In the event that the funds available out of the proceeds of bonds voted for any of the above projects will not permit the acquisition, construction and installation of all of the improvements for which such bonds were approved, such portion of such improvements as may be found to be most necessary by the City Council, shall be acquired, constructed and installed." I read the above language at the November 20, 1983 Council Meeting. A member of the public said site didn't recall that language being on the ballot; I replied that I doubted that it was. At the December 7, 1983 meeting, a Councilperson asked if we had investigated this further. We had not. We had not interpreted a comment from the public to be a directive of Council. i have since looked at the actual proposition on the ballot. Section 5 of the resolution reads in part: " Section 5. Propositions of whether or not the City shall insult said Itonds for the purposes described in Section 2 hereof shall be ssubinitted to the qualified voters of the City for their ratification or rejection at a special election to be held within the City on the 25th day of May, 1971. Said propositions shall he in the following forcn: 1 T's---- — — ----- - — -- — — — ---- --- PROPOSITION NO. I KENAI CIvir CENTER COMPLEX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS $800,000 Shall the City of Kenai, Alaska, issue its general obligation bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $800,000, said bonds to bear interest at a rate of not to exceed the maximum rate permitted by law at the time of their sale, to mature within 30 years from date of issue, to be paid both principal and interest out of annual tax levies to be made upon all of the taxable property within the City without limitation as to rate or amount and possibly out of such other sources as the City Council may hereafter legally provide, for the purpose of providing part or all of the funds necessary to plan, acquire, install and equip a civic center complex for the city including an auditorium convention center, a library health center, conference rooms, kitchen and swimming pool, together with all necessary utility and appurtenances all as more specifically provided in Resolution No. 71-12 of the City Council adopted on the 5 day of May, 1971. BONDS, YES. . . . . . . . . . / / BONDS, NO . . . . . . . . . . / So, the ballot did not repeat the information from Section 3. It did, however, refer to provisions of Resolution 071-12. There is no doubt in my mind that Ordinances No. 902-83 and 903-83 passed at the December 7, 1983 meeting were legal. Tim Rogers has agreed with this position (and stated so at the December 7, 1983 meeting). J I Y t� I , 1 = 14 ' i 1 n i u Y u .N"v `i 7 F0 w n i'C �+ �p �s ; q �- cs o C. City of Kenai Project: Kenai Municipal Airport Ramp Overlay & Itinerant Aircraft Parking December 1, 1983 83.100013K FOR: Engineering Services Inspector Technician 19.5 hrs. @ $43.37/hr. $ 845.72 ✓ Two Man Crew 14 hrs. C $83.00 hr. 1,162.00 ✓ • _ ........ �' F. c-:� .. . ......... -..»- $ 2.007.72 f e n 0 I .. . ��•o��s Si oN0.l � �-Si,v1 � SS 0 e.� 0 1 City of Kenai Project: Kenai Municipal Airport Parking Lot Improvements December 1, 1983 83.1000�* FOR: Engineering Services o: ✓ Inspector Technician 2.5 hrs. O $43.37/hr. $ 108.43 1p �•lo ItL` 5 108.43 i 1 4 iry • 0 u CITY OF KENAI " Del G;ap4&1 4 4iad4a" P. O. BOX $80 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 203 • 7590 MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director DATE: December 14, 1983 SUBJECT: Analysis of bond sale The information attached to this memo is being provided to you to help you understand the effect of an independent bond sale (i.e., not through the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank). This is being explored by the , City Administration because the City should have an option other than - the bond bank. We may find that we are not ready to sell bonds when the bond bank is ready and able to buy bonds. r Attached you will find: (1) My letter to John D. Urbina of Kirchner Moore & Co. (2) His response (3) Some information relative to bond insurance (4) Moody's and S 6 P ratings Let's concentrate on the response from Kirchner Moore 6 Co. The example used is a $2,000,000 sale with a 20 year life. The thrust of the comparisons is to determine if enough interest is saved over the life of the iasIle As a result of purchnsing band insurance to offset the additional up -front costs of an independent sale. Their analysis shown a total interest savings of $162,000. This is a present value savings of $69,000 (this is the meaningful figure, not the $162,000). They estimate that the additional tip -front costs would be $36,800 for a net present value savings of $32,200 for an independent sale. I have tested all of the asatimptions and present value calculations, and believe them to be reasonable, except that I do not believe the City will have to pay the $15,500 of registration fees if we use the bond bank. Therefore, the prevent value savings in the example should be (I believe) $16,700, :Ind not $32,200. Possibly, the most speculative variable in the example is the 50 basis points reduction in the interest rate of an independent sale vs. a bond bank sale. The information attached (P. 216 of "Creative Capital Financing") seems to suggest that this is a reasonable spread. The spread would be based upon a 38P A rating (this is the bond bank's rating) and an AAA rating (the presumed effective rate of insured bonds). For those of you interested in knowing the break-even yield spread necessary to prevent the independent sale from being more expensive than a bond bank sale, that calculation follows: Up -front Costs: Independent sale $ 62,300 Bond bank sale <10 000 Excess costs of independent sale e 2 300 The break-even point is the rate that would allow the present value of future interest cost savings to equal $52,300. The future value of periodic payments (20 years @ 10%) of $52,300 is $122,860. Total debt service @ 10.5% $ 4,860,000 Necessary break-even savings <122,860> 4,737,140 Number of years s20 Necessary annual payments 236 57 Imputed interest to amortize $2,000,000 over 20 years with payments of $236,857 is 10.12%. Therefore, we must have a rate savings of 38 basis points (10.5 - 10.12) to break even. I suppose that the conclusion to all of this (if, indeed, there is one) is that we are speculating that an independent sale is a savings. But, the chances seem good that it will at least he at the same cost as a bond bank sale. Then, there are the other advantages of an independent sale: mainly, entering the market when we wish. The disadvantage, of course, is that I might have to buy a necktie if I go to New York. The City Administration will continue to investigate this and advise Council if we wish to request funds to go the independent sale route. i r CITY OF KENAI w, " 0d Gap',ol 4 4ia44Q„ P. O. BOX $80 KENAI. ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 2u3 • 7335 November 21, 1983 John D. Urbina Kirchner Moore and Company 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3860 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear John: I had just sat down to write a letter to you, and I received your letter of November 18, 1983. I appreciate your visit. I had a chance to talk to Roy Barton a few days later, and between the two of you, I think I'm about half convinced that I need to look a little further at the City acquiring the ability to bond independently. I'm hoping that you can give me a letter describing, with an appropriate example, what can be expected if the City bonds independently, versus going to the bond bank. Assume a $2,000,000 sale of G.O. bonds with a 20-year life.. I'm not trying to get a . committment or proposal, of course. I just want to make sure that I understand the options. The kind of information I'd like to see is: 1) Estimated cost of acquiring a bond rating, 2) Estimated cost of bond printing, 3) Estimnted cost of a bank's charge to handle renistration, 4) Estimated cost of attorney fees (we already have voter authorization) 5) Estimated cost of preparation of prospectus, 6) Estimated chat of. insurance, 1) Arsumed effective bend rating; (with insurance), S) Projected rnte difference of independent sale versus sale through that Alaska Municipal (fond stank. ti �• 0 Paste 2 jf Finally, using the above information, expand the example of the $2,000,000 sale showing the difference between an independent Sale versus the bond bank. You showed me this the other day, but I've jalready found that it's much easier to explain it to the City Manager if I have some numbers to work with. I've bounced the idea off the City Manager and one member of the City Council and have received very positive responses. Again, thank you for the time you've given me on this (you're really dealing with a novice on this subject, I suppose you've gathered by now), -- I Sincerely, Charles A. Brown Finance Director . i CAB:jb F i { 1 rl I' I w M . I KIRCHNER MOORE & COMPANY • ALASKA MUNICIPAL BOND BANK SALE versus INDEPENDENT SALE presentation to ' CITY OF XENAI :....fit. 1. 0 4 , . t KIRCHNER MOORE & COMPANY Tix E:xon{N tvluninpal Bonds December 5, 1983 14r. Charles A. Brown Financial Director City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Itenai, Ak 99611 Dear Charlie: t:e are pleased to provide the enclosed information to assist you in your analysis of an Alaska :municipal Bond Bank sale versus an independent sale by the City cfdKenai. save our xi::�ately cursory analysis shows that the City ou $162,000 over the life of an issuesold independen0ly. when Present value savings amount to approximately Y the cost of insurance and the additional cost to be incurred by the City in selling independently are considered. Our assumptions in deriving the aforementioned estimates were basically those outlined in your letter dated November 21, 1983. The City should also keep in mind that by sellinc independently, you can pick your own time in the market and not be at the mercy or whim of the Bond Bank. This is an extremely important consideration in today's volatile interest . rate other , would give planning process. Please review the information at your leisure, and be sure to give us a call should questions arise or if further assistance is required. we are available at your convenience to meet with you and others you deem appropriate to discuss the enclosed. Ile are looking forward to hearing fror. you. Cordially, ::IP.CII*'ER MOORE & COM?ANY John D. Urbina s • J W .. �a a r r BOND ISSUANCE COSTS . 1. Cstinated Cost of acquiring a Bond Rating Rating Services Fee $1,500.00 Round Trip Air rare (1) Lodging Other 'rIxpenses (11) 1,600.00 300.00 and Total (iii) $3,40.00 (i) air fare for two I:enai official: (ii) One night at $150 each (iii) On a negotiated financing, Kirchner Moore & Company will cover its own expenses. 2. Estimated Cost of Bond t1rintinv_ _ Total $1,400.00 � r Estimated Cost 3. of registration Fees 1st year $ 1,100.00 2nd year 900.00 ` ` 3rd to 20th year 750.00/year . F Total $15,500.00 a, ,. 4. Estimated Cost of :!ttorney's Fees s Total 510,000.00 5. Estimate? Cost of Preparation and Printing of Prospectus (OMcidl Stater..ent) (i) {--- Total S 4,000.00 (i) on a no yotiat ed sale, :'irchner ::pore & Company would absoro the s cont of ^ry arina the Official t ^ e" n E f i t� r- 6. Estimatod Cost of Insurance Total $28,000.00 7. Assumed Effective Rating - Without Insurance - "BAA" or "A" With Insurance - ":AAA" i, 8. Projected Rate Difference - ?Average Interest Cost Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Independent Sale 10.50% 10.00% �'l ft d •- fd 00, _wwl�lllw—R��asais.--i. ut•_�_ _ _ J-: �.:.�:a- - -tom.-==. �i4„_ _ _.aT1`-^��.>•��?'3 .�— - • -.r -_ � .�- ..... F r EXAMPLE ASSUAIPTIONSs i) Par Anount $2,000,000 ii) Twenty-year maturity iii) Projected rate difference of .5ra ALASKA MUNICIPAL Rate 13O?7D BANK INDEPENDENT SALE 10.50% 10.00% Debt Service $243,000/yr. $234,900/yr. Total Debt Service $4,860,000 $4,698,000 ; SAVINGS: Gross Savings Over Life of Issue $162,000 Present Value Savings $ 69,000 Savings Per Year $ 81100 Y r) COST COt1PARISO:?: i Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Versus Independent Sale Bond Rank Independent Sale Difference �. Rating Service Fee - $ 3,400.00 $ 3,400.00 Bond Printing - 1,400.00 1,400.00 Registration Fee $15,500.00 15,500.00 - Attorney's Fee 1.0,000.04 10,000.00 - Official Statement - 4,000.00 4,000.00 Insurance - 28,000.00* 28,000.00 Total: $25,500.00 $62,300.00* $36,800.00 *assume insurance will be used - - ]!! - - - -- - -- - - - -- - 1 SUMMARY met, Difference In Costs $36,800.00 Present Value Savings 69,000.00 Net Savings to City of Kenai 532,200.00 i I" Co'pie -fro. Creaf;ve Cg1,P:ta/ F',�9,,.,.rs fo.. .;tole 4,J 4OC91 Ao✓PhhA././7" $y 7.t. PtJ7�'swft„ t l✓, G, Mawyg. it st�d be ep' lr ,*,S 4 t / 90 6 '" Fo A. DETERNINING THE ADVANTAGES Pannerahips lent subsidies AND DISADVANTAGES OF PRIVATE If refer. then. MUNICIPAL BOND GUARANTEES a large extent r a discussion Michael D. Joehnk and David S. Kidwell ida wallison. ery York Law tax Equity & : agreement is -ed suggestive s volume. See In recent years the increasing volume of municipal bond financing, coupled with changes in investor perception of risk, have contributed substantially 1. 81.2 USTC. to higher interest cost on new long-term bond issues sold by state and iuca) Tax Credit for governments. These conditions have prompted municipal finance authorities Jnits After the to search for methods of reducing borrowing costs. One method which is 1982 rapidly gaining in popularity is the private municipal bond guarantee. Bond insurance assures investors that in the event of issuer default, bondholders will promptly receive the scheduled coupon and principal payments from a third party. the guarantor. Bond guarantees arc presently offered by three firms: 1) the American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation (AIt1BAC), a subsidiary of MGIC _ Investment Corporation of Milwaukee. Wisconsin, a leading private guar- antor of residential mortgages: 2) NIGIC Indemnity Corporation. another subsidiary of 11GIC Investment Corporation, which complements the AM- BAC progrant by providing guarantees for lower rated bonds not eligible for ASIBAC coverage: and 3) the Municipal Bond Insurance Corporation (MBIA). which is it joint venture by four major insurance companies: Aetna Casualty and Surety. Aetna Insurance (of Connecticut General). St. Paul Fire and Marine. and United States Fire. The demand for hind insurance has increased dramatically. due in no small part to the New York City debacle. For example, ASIBAC reports that the number of policies written increased from 10 bond issues in 1974 it) 34 i+sues in 1976 with the corresponding par values risin_s from $29 million to $I 36 million, and M111A reports than alter insuring pm1y 12 issues in 1974. they inured 183 hand issues with a combined par value of more than S785 million during 1976. Mr. Joelnik is Prol'ewor of 1'1111ulce. Cullegc of liu%iness AtImmotration. Antony State University \fr. K.daell is 11rote-or of I-nance. College of Iiusuless. t..'nn'crslty of Teuncswc. 116s article ongin.Illy aplwared uI (;uw. rranten►,d Finance. Februa.y. 1978and is reprinted with pernimiou. 21. r .LT1jfA11�`� i� 1 ;i'a. is '.� `1' ,i i •/ y.-�-•.. lc`21rI1?l1fl.7f7�d(i�i'�YisilKiialYitie1`F��'r r �_. Y f1•�u''ir.4, .; 31.1 It seems clear that as long as interest rates and unsettled market conditions continue to plague the municipal bond market, the demand for bond guar- antees should remain strodg. Thus. it is incumbent on financial authorities of state and local governments that they understand the costs and benefits associated with these guarantees, This article contributes to that understanding by providing information about private municipal bond guarantees. Specif- ically. the article: I 1 describes the various bond guarantee programs. Z) discusses j the costs and benefits associated with each program: and 3) presents a simple 1 managerial model that can be used to evaluate the bond guarantee decision. 1 4 The Various Private Guarantee Nrogrants i The idea of municipal bond guarantees originated in the public sector when 1 the State of New Hampshire began guaranteeing sewage facility bonds in 1949. Since then, three other slates and the federal government have funded municipal bond guarantee programs and other states are reportedly evaluating similar programs. However, it was not until private guarantors entered the field in 1971 that bond insurance became available to most municipal issuers. Exhibit I presents selected features of the three private bond guarantee programs that are available to state and local governments.I As shown. the basic eligibility requirements for all three programs are relatively uniform and each allows bonds to be issued for any purpose. The fee payment sched- ules are also similar even though each guarantor uses a different base to determine its charge. Factors such as the issue's principal amount. maturity structure, and bond quality determine the total cost of the insurance to the issuer. Although there is an upper limit on the size of eligible bond issues. EXHIBIT 1 Selected Features: Private Municipal Bond Guarantees l'entures Which Issues must Ilossere to be hliltible for Guaranly CoN or Guaranty site or Dumas Quality Ip(1. lit little Program Type of Iswe• fill 1110111111%) Lfolilatonlf oriswel A%IIIAC G.l)A& Rev. lids. 511.6-522.1) SM, HIM 1::1; - I11:(; all alit- ol' csl.uag larihur, l lol . pl u►. & ur lleacr 41.11 priocg1.11 and inl.) inA•lest lodcnontc 6.0.'s s l.0-i18.0 pane 1 .1;-31..1; at tIt! - t'urp. Itut. prin. \ 111.11 puncglal and inl.) Interest MIIIA G.O.'s , Ulllil% 511.E-)20 11 Coicralh. Sfi11 hellcr 11; .'; at Olig'u:-d Rev. lids. 1Prn1. till%I HIM or prnlrglal Ind. *Wfill file mepillnl td Indelllllllt' Cmio ..111 1:11afalliee, :Ile till 11,11 btilld fill- demmly Carp. all alsll ytiarantee 11tf(It11,1s III aUt%t.lntllll- btlftls.l finis co( issuers modern guarani Onct and Po to AMI private revise : guarani compal one of possibi P cunn The antee I' disrup! counse lure cll submit determ From I insure uncom' t,tlilCa(: Reaso A It, bond i,. issue. greater inters•: Aw ketablc is deri- tracti%, rccogo suer.. marko Dill.. unrest, till sill the al• — 7 tL'��:1.•,;.��ii'u�.�!.U�":.«4.f'. iUia:a4i.fiCrflF cf�nl�'d1:i�iQ.'l.!id�:�4 �ia�L•i •.�a'.: y,!..n{1av tau. .:ia sass � �t� I -ket conditions 'or bond guar- : ial authorities s and benefits understanding tutees. Specif- its:2) discusses -scnts a simple mice decision. Iic sector when cility bonds in nt have funded edly evaluating ors entered the micipal issuers. fond guarantee As shown. the .itively uniform payment sched- ,ffcrent base to nount. maturity nsur, -cc to the )IC 1 J issues. uurnntees - ror Guaranty I:osi or Guaranly ipd. sit !lore or issue) nal principal and elerc%l J,lit of firmopal ,nid ntemst _'; ut nlian.11 u�llcq+.11 unh +,' tN/Iltt I++Ile♦ 1111- 4- Prhalr %tunirlpal llnnd Inwrance • 215 this constraint should not present a problem to the majority of tax-exempt issuers since the municipal hand market is dominated by relatively small to moderate size obligations. It is precisely to these issuers that municipal bond guarantees are aimed. Once a local government obtains a guarantee for its new bonds. Standard to AMBAC insured onds. , oody s, as a matter of policy. does not consider private bond insurance when rating new band issues. and therefore, will not revise a rating bemuse of a hand guarantee. Nloody's maintains that private guarantees are a form of insurance and since they do not rate insurance companies, they do not consider guarantees in their rating process. Thus, one of the complications that may result from the use of a guarantee is the possibility of a split rating. However. the improved ratings assigned by S & P cannot be ignored by potential users. The process of obtaining bond insurance is similar among the three guar- antee programs. In gencrai. bond in,utanie is simpl6 t;, cht:.i:.. do= no! disrupt the traditional marketing process. and does not alter the roles of bond counsel, financial advisors, and investment bankers. Another important fea- ture common to the three programs is the opportunity for underwriters to submit bids with and/or without the bond insurance. The issuer can then determine precisely the advantages, if any, of obtaining the bond insurance. From the investor's perspective. hond guarantees are well drafted. They insure prompt payment in the event of default and the insurance is essentially unconditional and noncancelable. Furthermore, the guarantee does not affect the tax-exempt status of the bond's coupon payments, even if the private guarantor makes payment after default. Rettsons for Bond Insurance fi A local govemntcnt may find private bond insurance attractive for a new ond issue lirra number of reasons. First. it improves the quality of the bond ssue. In fact, the lower the issuer's bond rating bef►re the guarantee. the reater the potential for quality improvement and the greater the possible nterest cost savings. A second reason is to increase the issue's marketability. The more mar- ketable a bond i+sue. the tosser the borrowing cost. Increased marketability is derived from holh the increased quality —which may make the isstic at. tractive to a wider segment of buyers ---and the appeal that a nationally recognized guarantee ha< for investors. Not surprisingly. lesser known is- suers. such as small communities. may obtain the greatest improvement in marketability of their hond issucs from the addition of a bond guarantee. Finally. hond ;y-uaraufecs nla) he usel'nl in special situations. For example. rmresolved or pending legal action ---such as that raised recently reg: iding the constitutionality of local property Loxes to finance education —may altect file ability of, a municipality to obtain the unqualified opinion of ;1 invld A 'Kti..�� sir+I• __� •e•' _��.. _ � ".+-.i;. µdi-...tir.....+11.w .... ./�. .. . d. . .....A.. M 111111011 MIN jjj� 216 CREATIVE CAPIT%l. HN %MING r. counsel. This could prevent the sale of an issue. I lowever. because the bond bonds, guarantee itself provides ample security. it may overcome investor refusal in ages, to purchase bonds due to legal uncWaintic%.2 Thus, the special situation tualoub category may provide sufficient justification for the cost required to obtain governs a bond guarantee. The C The Costs and Benefits of a Bond Guarantee Pater Obtaining a municipal bond guarantee is advisable so long as the benefits' enable 1 exceed the costs. As might be expected, the most important cost associated should with a bond guarantee is the cash outlay for the insurance premium. As compar discussed. this cost varies with the size of the issue. the quality rating nor- guarani malty assigned to the obligation. and the insuror. While the dollar amount between for bond insurance may appear substantial. particularly for large. low rated of cash issues. experience suggest% thdi. utuldli. ilisul'um)KIII;U111s d"ou'." f%,, 20 to 30 basis points of the total netinterestcost CNICI of the new hondissue. 3 the tint The only other costs are the miscellaneous expenses such as additional an- highly I alvtical or consults ng work resulting from obtaining the on insurance. highly t Norniallv. these miscellaneous costs are small given the Sim plicit y of oh- the diff g i tond insurance. taming; with a In the absence of peculiar marketing problems. the most important benefit of bond insurance is the lower borrowing cost. There are two reasons for The IN these cost savings. First, bond insurance reduces risk of default to the investor by having the guarantor substitute his or her credit worthiness for that of the The issuer. Clearly. an improvement in a hond issue's credit standing (S & P 1'es I ratings should result in lower new issue borrowing cost. For example. .1 local savings government which is normally rated triple-11 may improve its credit rating by the to double -A by using a guarantee. In such a case the risk of default an the whetlic: issue is reduced by the incremental security of the guarantee. Second. bond which I insurance front a nationally recognized private insurer provides valuable S, investment information (o the investor. The informational content of the holld guarantee is particularly important when the issuing community is not well known, when the issue is small, or when the issue is secured by a novel financin:-- arrangemem. *rise informational function may reduce interest costs The sit! by increasing an issue's marketability. lakes 11 Recent evidence suggests that substantial interest cost savings can he re. the life alized through the use of municipal hood guarantees. one source retiorlS, Recall, interest cost savings averaging 40 to So ha%is point% on new h ind issues. N'llefit Another miurec suggests that. depending upon circunNances. cost saValits rate fin as 1111:111 a% 50 to 95 11.1.4% Points are possible. 1 An approximate idea of the cost ra, stle of potential interest cost savings may he obtained by simply llotilly, the Thus. I yield spreads that notinally exist between bonds which are similar in all U.S. "I rc%PC4:1% except agency ratings. For corm ide, o% er the last decade the a% erinw Ano. dillelelu:e in %icld %pread 11VIZ77ii Mae tern eciieral orbgalioii honT.—r-7le"7_1 time o: Aaa .11M 11.1a %%;I% apprommately_ list bai% r7_11-1-111. and for %iindar revenue / inspro% '.�' �` `tit Win► x. antenfSF�e.1_�.ul�rs��.,._.._--�tr�.:i.r..r..- --1.:--,;, .7...r.._._. --..__�:�.s: .acn•.- "'�r.v_. �._W-.r�w,r prbmr Nunicipnl 11onA lnevace • 217 1, Ise the blind blind.. the difference was slightly over 40 basis points. Titus. improvement afar refusal in agency rating can Icad to substantial cost savings for the issuer and has ial situation undoubtedly contributed to much of the interest savings reported by local ed to obtain governments. The Guarantee Decision Procedure Potential users of bond guarantees require a decision model which will the benefits enable them to rationally and systematically evaluate whether bond insurance ;t associated should be purchased for their new lung term bonds. The decision involves remium. As comparing the alternative of issuing: the bonds with or without the bond i rating nor- guarantee. Therefore. the evaluation may be based on differential cash flow s )liar amount between the alternatives over time. The proper method to evaluate a series .e. low rated of cash payments over lime is the net present value. or as it is sometimes :count for 20 called. the present worth method. This technique specifically incorporates bond issue.; the time value of money. That is, a dollar received today is vaiucd nu►w dditional an- highly than a dollar to be received tomorrow, which in turn is valued more d insurance. highly than for the next day and so on. The model presented below compares ►licity of ob- the differential benefits (cash inflows) and costs (cash outflows) associated with a municipal bond guarantee alternative. Mant benefit reasons for The Model o the investor 'or that of the The major henefit of a guaranteed municipal bond issue is the reduced Wit' S & P interest cost over the life of the obligation. Ultimately. such interest cost :mplc.'a local savings are realized through a reduction in coupon payments made passible • credit rating by the guaranteed option, Assuming that the principal amount is the sane lefault on the whether the issue is guaranteed or not. the periodic interest cost savings. Second. bond which is labeled S,, may he defined as follows: ides valuable S, = the coupon payincmt required with the nonguaranteed option minus nt of the bond the coupon payment required with the guaranteed bond alternative ty is not well in a given lime period 1. :d by a novel interest eost% The subscript. I. identifies the lime period (maturity) in which [lie cash now takes place. Thus. a %cries of differential cash flows. S,, would exist over its can he re- the life of the comparable guaranteed and nongnarameed serial obligation%. source reports Ilecause the reduced cash outflows IS,) occur over time. the amount of the lHmd issues. benefit must he discounted Io its present value. 'fhe approximate discount cost savings rate fur a local government Ili u%c in a present value model is the opportunity . lie idea of the cost rate which the resource% could otherwise earn in the priv;de sector.` ply uatin;: the Thu%. the minimum discount rate is the prevailing average rate of ro urn on similar in all U.S. Treasur% obligations of similar maturity. de the average Another potential hencf it is the chaulge in proceeds to the issuer at the at bonds rated lime of %ale: the increase in the percent of par realved h% the i%%ucr. The molar revenue improvement in issiicr 1114weeds. C_ Wray he defined as: 1r ,?y.. N ,y +t. L__.-. .,.. -. -- _ •�r;+t =�{_. _ �•may. .�• f. t••e�♦ �:! �4. •i%••.. ... •, • ' a.. ...- ••NMI." �. ��.' `-!t}••..;.. ..:.:.... - - "•'._.• .`l,C,;a';;..w`.i w:Y•I„'/..•�•!�IMMVrii• _ 1 .. i. •t•i•`��••.,w r ,t . .•wit»:.r•. •• •.. N-1 .l.��. w'�"l.i�:w: ..r...:: •irt • ,•..i,lM .. µ: w - .,.�. •+ . •.iOni•:: � v•.. /�y��r, ✓�`'•�1,•7-�fyI!• ' r •*• •r{itf'•►�'.�1�,'••'ti..•'7'.i:•`^.L-.lfy'!:';HSt7r'.C?tei/.�!1.•vT..;`;,MYa7., .:l: r. , :• ' .,._:.. HOW BONDS ARE RATED } j Mnral description Moody S&P :' .. Best quality An AAA High I w quality f As AA w' Upper medium A A Medium ass BBB _ Speculative Be BB . - Poor to default Cal CCC . Highly speculative default Ca CC 40 Lowest grade C C Ratings may also have ♦ or — Sign to show relative Standings in class. ••••�!�:pub•IMF(•�i•�:l��ViSpAN�.ii4i►1r1/i`yi„•:�.,.:1�:•:�•i:.•isr�lwJwlw.�i.iY11`.MNr.M111.�T�fY�Yt�Y17.V�'R1f.T•1i4;�✓•T6...%.'$t7i;.•��i�M ^.i•'w ��LL :rn••►• - �•��wswrrre-:a:� ,,.--.:.....sue — _-��,...:,,eC C- PAY ESTIMATE CITY OF KENAI .'age -ZN FO r % PI 0 : L Project IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUITCH RAMP Contractor Del -tsar, Inc. Address General Delivery Kenai, Alaska 99611 _ Project No. none Phone Period From 10/22/8'3 .to Fi.na.l ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE O1 Original contract amount $218,750.00 ✓ ONot change by change orders 6+652.38 Adjusted contract amount to date 225,402.28 t ANALYSIS OF WOItK COMPLETED 0, Original contract work completed 225,244.00 � 0 Addition:; from change orders completed 6,652.38 V GMaterials stored at close of period u0_ 0 'total earnedo+US + n - 231,896.38 T OLess retaiitago of percolit -tr-- -2Y}-T$�96�$•' :t Total earned le,--. retaina-c�-�= 231,896J8 IXSS ;tm�tunt 0f pt•eriau, pa} trnt• 229,269.00 +� 011. !3al.tn4e .tut this tta; .sent 2,627.38 Y �:: lcatrector Del -Mar., Inc. "a, ::�•v: Tn'•!S Ins ec or:CITY OF KENAI Page 2 o f P A Y ESTIMATE NO CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR .i,:cordinit to the best of my knowledge and WWI, I certify that all items and amounts shown on the face of this Periodic Fntimate iot Partial Payment are Correct; that .111 work has been performed and 'or mateft.il P;uppliuJ in full Accordance with the requirements .it the referenced Contract, and 'or July Authorized deviations, substitutions, Alterations, and/or additions; that the 10'"lling is a true and correct statement of the contract account up to and including the last day of the period covered by this Periodic Estimate; that no part of the "Palance Due This Payment" hasbeen received, and that the usid rai gned and his subcontractors have -(check applivabir a. Complied with all the labor provisions of said contract. b. CoMpiiUJ With all the labor ptovirions if said contract except in those. instances where an honest dispute exists with to- 8PUCC to Said labor PCOViSiO06. (11 W is chocked, describe Wetly naluto of dispute.) By Eiel-Mar, InCtCantractor) (Signature illAushorlsed Representative) 19B— Title CERTIFICATION OF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER I certify that I have checked And verified the Above And foreguing Periodic rtitim.itv for Partial Payment; this 1.7 the best III my knowledge and belief it i% .1 true And correct statement of work refformud and 'or material supplied by the contractor: that All work Ind *or material included in thi-i Pt-riudie Ebtiniate hj,4 but -is itsipectud by Site iml 'tit by lily Juty auchoriewd CurresentAtive of a%lImcaost4 and that it ha% been rvriorinvJ iml 'or supplied in full accordance with quirl-ruclits 4.1 the reference contract; .11ij -a -tit cl 1,,"!!jrV that pafllalf.9 .& Aimed and rt,41u,ited by the contrac ar.6 goagetly coti .1i Ate ty-t�is of work i,etiornitai jq.1 ,.Al itupplic to .1.1cu. APPROVID BY CffV OF KENAI 4ignej City ofi.44anaLwoll r) [] CITY MANAGER FINANCE Jt APUBLIC WORKS 1, 99— (3 ATTORNEY Date jirel?Y CLERK __ 13... --.— PRE -PAYMENT CERTIFICATION BY FIELD ENGINEE ORIGINAL COPY TO 1;:::� Check type at payment uttojj,-d: I have th$ I' •t IIO-Stv .haul.. III,. coiittactot':4 Sche-hol., of Altimstrit., 1,.r C.#jtr.jj.t A4.%.m4.tltx. file "LlIVI J11J rero— ,I me in`SpU4;ti"SN M tilt rralv.t, .01.1 tilt; 1, scruff, Submits, I by the atchilvet I molt., r. It i, ins. opiliton -hat the ..C.1tvilient of %,.I'll; r'1101114,4 4111 .-r mat. (1.1., -.111 pfiv.t 0, accur.ltv. 01.11 dw I mitt.st.t.-r i-. tilt, III the Vatiff.let, and thit t IV ct'"CrJet.-t 'h.lul t ;-V 1-.Ii.t fil" Afth-olic rC&IUV'tt:j 1 :4:rtllv that .611 *A.'rh .111.1 .'r ", I., MO.. Anjur the colltraet 1'.1, ct-ts In 'I.. ct, 1-y tile ass.1 that it lit, been l,t,t1.,ristl,J sn.t 'or up- i.:ivj SO toll .1110r-Mth V '%I'll SO. ft quit, 1twilts 0 the c, Ott I. r. City of Kenai,. -la t PAY-. ESTIMATE N0 .•Lge 3 of f :I Project IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUNCH RAMP Item No. Item Description Original Contract Amount 'total to Date Quantity and Unit Unit Bid Price Total Unit Cost Quantity Amount 1. Mobilization & Demobil. Job L.S. 14 000.00 14 000.00 100% 14,000.00 2. Remove Ex st ng Ramp and Float System Job L.S. 6,000.00 6 000.00 1009 6,000.00 RAMP 3.a Type D Gravel Fill Bedding Material 225 CY 22.00 4,950.00 225 CY 4,950.00 3.b Porous Membrane 1,150 SY 2.50 2,875.00 0 SY 2 8 .00 3.c Timber Sills 5.5 MBF 1,990.00 10 945.00 MB. 10, 4 .00 3.d Reinstall salvaged pre- Icast concretelanks 50 ea 160.00 8,000.00 50 ea. 8,000.00 3.e Furnish new precast concrete Planks 195 ea 450.00 87 750.00 195 ea 87,750.0010 3 Install new precast concrete a 8 e 50 00 27 000.0 •180 ea. 27. 000.00 3,a Servi-ce-Fl2at & Abutment Job L.S. 3,800.00L.S. 880.00 600. p 1 ea. 600r� Removable steel guide 0 4 ea. `� 7,000.00 4 PARKIN (trading & finishing 11.700 SY 5 5 0 0011,700 SY 5,850.00 1In 4,b T C ect d 6 0 3,404 CY 20,424.00 1 i 10 CY 2 0.00 i Total Amount for :yip !'agc �O $218,750.00" lO $225,244.00 / I J —... ;—M P*A: Y EST I MATE N 0:;,,;e o f 5 Project IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUNCH RUMP 5 SCIIEDUL11 01 �RTrRIALS STORED AT CLOSE OF MIS PERIOD (:attach a detailed schedule including quantities for each item) Attach meat Item No. Invoice No. Invoice Date Material Description (Vendor, Pre il,,fit , ete.l Amount A R C I I I � I � 1 i I TOTAL y� �� 0- I ,i'ArY- ESTIMATE N0: tpe 5 of 5 r i Project IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUNCH RUMP b I l I i SCHEDULE OF CONTRACT CHANCE ORDERS (C . 0. ) 1.1wt V%4-fy rh.ln:¢ .11.4f 1„l1G'.1 its ,i. a 411 lllits tcquem v%un a no II .•fw h.t% been Ii.•ne son.-er .me or r1ort .t h vrJt-rr. AOrITUNS TO CnIGIQAL CC"TNACT PRICE 6E0U1_TIO4S aQpM C4•ITRACT PRICE AS S�O�N :11 CHA•.iE CAMEni (c) CONTRACT CHAµGE OR:Eq OESCRIPTIOY TOTAL C94T 7tr ITI-tiIj A6C:7 nv CpIANGL JQoen (a) . =;T 'v C.IAp ;E �a�EP ITEM;: _CMPLETEO TO ATE .1p. pA•C i 9/8 Porous Membrane $4.025.00 •4,02 .00 11 2 10 2 emov Steel SHeeting to install concrete plank 2,627038 2,627.38 r-a 6¢ ro,r.xi,s 6,652.38 06,652.38 —0— .�iTiirot•etl lost of Chaww orders (.C.0.) (:t 1 $6,652.38 4- i ihlluetions from Contract (c) -0- `et t'! mvtoo F: om C.0 O 6,652.38��' 1:::1n�C' l�t':t•r� thitt reduce the vonti*act Colu:ln (C / Should t•tduce tho '70t.11 to :tat. Column for that item PROJECT COMPLETED CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF - RELEASE OF LIENS To: City of Kenai P. 0. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Project: IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUNCH RAMP Contract Date: August 24, 1983 The undersigned, pursuant to the Contract Documents, hereby certifies that except as listed below, the Releases or Waivers of Lien attached hereto include the Contractor, all Subcontactors, all suppliers of materials and equipment, and all performers of Work, labor or services who have or may have liens against any property of the City of Kenai arising in any manner out of the performance of the Contract referenced above. The City can require the Contractor to submit Separate Releases or Waivers of Liens from Subcontractors and material and equipment suppliers. EXCEPTIONS: If none, write "None". If required by the City of Kenai, the Contractor shall furnish bond satisfactory to the City of Kenai for each exception or in the alternative, the City of Kenai may withhold final payment. 1N$-L M i1 v7 IK 9—P ter v2_ — 0 STATE OP .JbA*s"KA W1Sc. c n+J''1V ) a014 NTy OF MAQ 7- Av )ss THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this j6711 day of A4,00- Gi f, 1983, Name:.Pr4 E4,,EX , Titre—: `.-A, of eye �.��,�►ieing personally no% wn 'to me or fiav � proceed sa'tistactory evidence of identification, appeared before me and acknowledged the voluntary and authorized execution of the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation. No ary A65 Tc or raga-.✓; s: e.vs. • My Commission Expires: f 7 V-1 0 PROJECT COMPLETED CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF PAYMENT OF DEBTS AND CLAIMS To: City of Kenai P. O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Project: IMPROVEMENTS TO BOAT LAUNCH RAMP Contract Date: August 24, 1983 The undersigned, pursuant to the Contract Documents for Construction, hereby certifies that, except as listed below, he has paid in full or has otherwise satisfied all obligations for all materials and equipment furnished, for all work, labor, and services performed, and for all indebtedness and claims against the Contractor for damages arising in any manner in connection , with the performance of the project referenced above for which = the City of Kenai or his property might in any way be held responsible. The City of Kenai can request the Contractor to submit Separate Releases or Waivers of Liens from Subcontractors and material and equipment suppliers. EXCEPTIONS: (If none, write "None". If required by the City of Kenai, the Contractor shall furnish bond satisfactory to the City of Kenai for each exception or in the alternative, the City of Kenai may withhold final payment. CONTRACTOR: DEL -MAR, INC. f)- f G 1•'Y•L - . .B ignature STATE OF w�t•.ir;•nl ) QOA�/�fJ a ry,n�Qar/len,, )ss THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this Or* day of J C &<—, 1983, Name: Titfee jo&srofv; , of 4•t4i& 9 -; be rng persona y knoi7n to me or having produced satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before me and acknowledged the voluntary and authorized execution of the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation. Notary Pu6r - r .•�. s My Commission xpires:,y ;;-oy U-1 j+j,0tXH F,,NC-INEEk 11V CITY OF KENAI i ATTN: JACK LASHOT CITY ENGINEER 5A DEC h, r�Ecc�vEa ; 1 UECENBER 1983 r �Publric W tKOnwp� ks De �,. 82.101 ENGINEERING SERVICES Kenai Utilities Plan �. November 1983 Principal Engineer 43 hrs. U $67.48✓ r f • r $ 2,901.64 ",•r �, .� =,1 i:r / G �! / `/.�j7 S 2 , 90 1 .64 , i r t :L .1� CONSULTING ENGINEERS December 9 1983 City of Kenai �c••,, �� a'• �� Box Sse y9oro, �� 97 DEC 1983 Kenai, AK 99 611 " RECEIVED = City of Kend Public Wora 03pt. S T A T E M E N T RE: #8334 - 1st & 2nd Streets - Inspection & Construction Mgt. PREVIOUSLY BILLED -3$ 9r" Professional Services through 11/31/83 3S' yo Principal Engineer 28 HRS @60:� 1,680.00 Inspector 144.5 @95:� 6,502.50 Drafting 9 @30:� 270.00 Clerical 6.25 @20:� 125.00 8, 777.51Ir 8,577.50 ✓ Direct Project Expenses Prints & Film 24.57J� 10.49 Paint 5.94 J Laboratory Testing 1,594.00 ✓ Laboratory Testing 1,216.00 ✓ 2,851.P10 � O.H. lei xl.1 3,13 .10 ✓ 3,136.10 STATEMENT TOTAL -3:49 y9, Q y!, 00 NOT TO EXCEED 49,500.00 ✓' I LOSS. PREVIOUS PAYMENTS -3$ ,+f-?9."AO JS'127, 10 BALANCE DUE i i f I I —r—D At I CAI` w Z e4l to, 144 C, See a-4 Co� OIA- IF X., A 007- OY cr F7 ..�--��9eo - wf® .l n