Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-10-27 Council Packet - Work SessionKenai City Council Work Session October 27, 1983 Joint Session with the Planning and Zoning Commission CIP Section 36 CITY OF KENAI .� Del G?dpdal of 4"10 F. 0. /0X 580 KINAI, ALAIKA 91611 TIMMONS III - 7636 NOTICE OF WORK SESSION 0 There will be a joint work seoeion of the Kenai City Council and ------ the Planning do Zoning Commiaoion on Thuraday, Oct. 21, 1983 of 6s00 PM in the Council Chombore. To be discusoeds 1. Capital Improvomonts Projects. 2. Engineering Proposals, Section 36 In addition, the Council will review the Porconnol Code dealing with leave time accrual, me rr- `Janet Whelan City Clark GATE©s Get. 21, 1903 M rN - 1 1 1 1 i I i y #1 - KENAI CITY PROJECTS 1. Standard, Richftold, Thompoon Place - G 2. Spruce, Second b Third - P 3. VIP - Loco, Wotorgato, Kotch - G 4. Lake, Merino, Granite Point, A FBO - P 5. Robin, Konaitze, Eagle Rack, Sondpiper, Torn, Strawberry S. - G 6. Alpine - G 7. Juliunnon, Amon, Harobara, Angler - G S. Cook Inlet Viow/Liloc 42 - REGIONAL PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF KENAI 1. Library Addition 2. Extend N. Taxiway Airport 3, Extend Main Apron Airport 4. Beaver Creek Fire Station y. Ski/Grass/flirt Strip Airport 6. Float Plane Benin Airport 7. Runway Ext, Airport S. Harbor -Bulkhead, Drodginct, Boat Romp 9. Civic Center 10. Council Chambers #3 - REGIONAL PROJECTS/STATE OF ALASKA RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Street Lights for Traffic Control 2. Resurface Spur Highway from Soldotno to Kenai 3. Rebuild Remainder of Highway from Cooper Landing to Seward from Mile to Mile in Two Projects ri A u , CITY OF KENAI " Od Capdal 4 414"a", F. O. 80X Ito KENAI, ALAEKA 90611 TILAPNONE $tE r Tilt October 27, 1983 TO$ Wm, J. Brighton, City Manager FROM$ Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works SUBJECT$ 1984-85 CIP FOR$ Council and Planning and Zoning Work Session on CIP 10/27/83 Attached is how I understand the 1984-85 CIP List is prioritized after the Council work sessions of$ September 15, 1983 September 29, 1983 October 12, 1983 I will have index cards on the cork board that can be moved around to change the priorities and easily see the overall picture. Below is the key to color coded cards. White - Roads, Water, a Sewer Green - Parks and Rea Blue - Airport Yellow - Other 3/40 red dot means that this project will cost the City additional money to operate and maintain after it is completed. All other projects will cost the City less money than it does now. p „ i I CAPITAI, IMDROWNWIT PU0JFXTtl (CID) 1984.05 PAN11"NARY ROUGH PRO" 9MT P,l3T. x 01000 Y, 1, titandard, Richfield, 100 Thompson place - n *Y. Library Addition 700 E 1. 0pruoe, Beoond, i Third - P 800 4. VIP - bars, 0unries, Ketoh - a 000 e 0. bake, Marine, Granite point, 000 V.D.O., Main Btreat Loop - P 6. 0. ttighbush, Davidson, Bumblebee - a 180 7, g. Aliak, Bwirea, Mighhush - A 700 8. 0ld Town - D 400 *9. extend N. Taxiway Airport 1,600 *10. Extend Main Apron Airport 2,700 *it. Deaver Creek Fire station 280 *12, ski/Oraaa/Dirt Btrip Airport 110 *17. Float Plane Basin Airport 1,100 *t4. Runway Extension Airport 0,000 *10, Harbor/Bulkhead, Dredging, Baatramp 1,900 *16, Beach Path 10 17, Robin, Kenattxe, Bogie Rock, 100 sandpiper, Tern, strawberry s, - a 19. Alpine - O 70 10, Juliussen, Ames, 750 Darabors, Angler - a *70. Camping Area 000 *21. Dike Tralis - Tinker to Awires 460 Redoubt - Forest of, to Bpur Also mentioned but not decided a o $ *A, Addition to City Mail 000 D, spruce Btreet paving - Bpur to Beach 400 *C. Community Center - Multi -purpose 41000 *0, RV Camper Park - apruoQ 6 Beach 000 E. G9k Inlet View Drive 6 Lila@ 0trset 600 *F. Beach Path Engineerinq to *a, Ryanos 6eeek zssil Putondert t0o *Means this proleat will cost the City Additional money to operate and maintain alter it is completed, All other pro)ecte will Groat the City teas money than it does now, I A CITY OF KRNAI RI1,801,11TI ON NO, 82 - 140 A 1111SOLUTIGN Ots Till', COUNCIL Oil Till! CITY OP KENAI, ALASKA, ADOPTING 11111 CITY Oh KENAI, ALASKA, 1983.84 CAPITAL IMPROV11Mf.NT PRU,IIICTS (CIP) LIST POR IMQUt'sST FOR STATI1 GRANTS. S llr-,RI/AS, input for the 1983.84 CHI List was requested and received from the Kenai City Council, City Planning and Zoning Commission, other City Commia3ionsI City Manager and Department heads, and especially the citizens of the City of Kenai, and -- - W11RR11AS, the following public meetings were field, most of which were well publicized and advertisod. Public Work Sessions and Public Discussions Hearings Planning and Zoning September 22 November 10 October 13 October 27 November 10 Harbor Commission August 31 September 18 November 18 Parks and Recreation Auguot 17 September 14 October 12 ---__ City Council August 3 December 15 Atigi st 10 September 1 ` October 27 . o , Noven►bc- r 4 November 17 November 22 1ecember i j" December l December 7 { Ill111R11AS, the Counci 1 of the City of Kenal , after re`elving and analyzing the input from all sources anti after much dh;cussslua anti deliberation, has decided to adopt the attached 1983-84 tall' List, and 6 1011111PAS, the Mayor and the Council of the City of Kenai p l edge their affirmative vote for tho maintenance and operational Costs of all the project;, ilisted, a , a • JIB__ Q, c ;n J ' ._ _I .r i 1 . ( Pago l NOW, Till' UPFOR1',, Bill IT 11111SOLVI?I) BY 1III3 COUNCIL OF '!'Uf; t;ITY Off KIlNAI, ALASKA, that the City of Konni ttclopt the attnc:hocl 1 ist ontitled, "City of Kenai, Alaskn, 1981-84 Cnpi.tal Improvemont Prejoctn Roquost for State Grants." PASSIM BY Till: COUNCIL OF "AIR Ci TY Oil KLNAI, ALASKA, this 15th clay of Docomber, 1982. ncerit o0 y �. ATTRS'C itrlet wholan, ty er o o � 7 , l r t o e I 1 l� I ,I CITY Gil KENAI, AI,AHA 1983-8-1 CA1'1TAL I11f'Rt)VINfUST PRODUCTS RIMIJINT PCR STATi,, GRANTS CAST ACCUM. IMPR©VEMUNTS x $1 2000 x $1.000 1. Ifirst and Second Streatg - P $ 422 $ 422 2. Aliak, McCollum, Cindaralla, Fox Princess, Linwood Ext. • G 669 1,091 3. Thompoon Park • G 021 2,012 4. I Standard, Richfield, Thompson Placo G 284 2,296 S. Spruce, Second, and Third - P 738 3,034 6, i VIP• -Lora, Watergate, Ketch - G 491 3,525 j I I 7. Lako, Marino, Granite Point, P, It.9.0. - P 469 3,994 I 8. Librury Addition --(not to oxcoud 4,000 600 4,S9.1 9, S. Ilif3hhusIlt, 1)avidaon, Humblub •e - G 169 4,763 10, i 11, Aliuk, hwire,n, Ilighim.'sh - G 6511 5,417 I IL. Main Strout Loop - (Cotirthms-se) - 1' 3i39 5,806 I., A. P, Voluble Parking 1' 472 6,.78 --f= -- 13. !Sall 1';irl: Impr��t•tii�►�.rnt:s 150 b,-1:l3 339 0,817 13. I#xtstl0! t';tx is�.ty A,P, 1,500 8,317 f r b" i i I I i , 1 City of Kenai--CIP 1983-84 C -- Page 2 COST ACCUM. IMPROVEMENTS x $1,000 x $1,000 10. Extend ;fain Apron (1200 x 350) A.P. $ 2,500 $ 10,817 i 17. Beaver Creek Fire Station 253 11,070 18. A.P. Ski/Grass/Dirt Strip ? 10, Float Plane Basin ? 20. A.P. Runway Ext. 5,000 I 21. Harbor --Bulkhead, Dredging, Boat Ramp 1,7S0 22. Path to Beach 10 23. Robin, Kenaitze, Eagle Rock, Sandpiper, ^' Tern, Strawberry S. - G 297 i � 24. Alpine - G 62 i a 25. luliussen, Ames, Barabara, Angler - G 721 i I -° 26. Camping Area 500 I " 27. Racquetball. Court 35 to 70 ^, -- 28. Bike Trails--Rewoubt--Spur to Forv;r Spur --Tinker to swire!; 460 is f ll L n CITY OF KENAI Vd CapZW 44 44u4afl j I. 9. 0011 $00 MAI, MAINA 99911 Tl/t/N6Nt fN fttt 1993-84 Capital Improvement Projeeto Narrative (First 19 Projecto Only) 1. Firot h gmeand Stropta_-Pnvinn- %422,000 Thia project will provide your -round nem000 to Mommoen Subdiviaion and Wildwslnd from Redoubt Avenuo which are alroody paved. A newer main will he inotallad in firm atroet And both newor and water aorvicen will be provided to nil adjoininq tote. Aloo, a new otorm water outfall will be conotrsacted at the Muff to eliminato oov©ro erosion problomn, Enginoerinq deoign work io presently boinq done on thin project using other funds, 2, Alink, McCollum, Cinderella, Fox, Princeon, Linwood Extension - Gravel - 669,000 Thio project would replace existing poorly ranotrsseted mssd ntrostn in a primarily raoidential area with all weather, well drained gravel stro©ta. Prtmently, many Of thnae roads are itnponaable durinq breakup. Alno, we hope to lower a very high water tahle through proper deotgn of an area wide dratnago nyotem, Engineerina denion work in prseuentiv being done On thin project uninq other fundn. 3. Thompson Park travel - 14921 O_iO Thompoon Park 5ubdiviuinn, Ono of the larger renident,inl ossbdiviolona in gonni, to in dire need of ces•onsltruet,od all weather gravel otrento, Approximately 60-69 Improved propertiro nee now nerved by mootly loud otraoto, 440 Standard Riehfietrl, Ttlompt:on-Purr? ,-_Prssvel�- 4294*0011 Thin pro joet would Complstt,e the gravel res,1nnsstrOP,t ton of all sstreetts within Valhalla Nssightn quhdiviflton, Ahaut 10 propert,ten would he nerved, E:nginslstring dnsftsin work its quinq to fist done nn thin project uniniq ether fundr), 9. F12rucn,.Sstfonmd , 01_s-tst Third - 11,3v in(I - 47 IA1111 By onv inq and stxt,end inst water end smner l instt) to t,hvnn Ars;at", the City wn>>lti complote it orojoi!t withio it re,;icfotntial am" 1:11,3t received atatss nrstnt, fssnditm in the 1"PI-82 voarls, y. 6. V, I.P. Lornn,yW019P(Intn Kotrh_-_wflrnvrtl�- $4911201) Thin project will uparado the main eolInr,f;nr atreeta within 1 V.I.P. hubdiviaton, a very larsie, denirnble area of the City. Thin area in lnc;ntnd nc;ront; the Kenai River and n„edn rood _ imprevementn. 7. Lake, Marine. Grnnite Paint, & F.R.A. Paving $469.000 Pavino thene ntreeta end extnndinq water and newer would grently enhance nn important downtown comrnercial area and the airport related buninnanno. Pavinq thean iaolnted, unimproved streeta would complete tho paving in their reopoctivo areas. Be Library Addition - S600,000 - The Lihrary Addition would providn approximately %4,13011 erfuarm Peet to be uned for ntorAge, additional main library floor area, activity apnceo and additional conference opnee. The library continuos to orow and providen an axeellent oarvice to the local community and Kenni Peninnuln. 9, 5. Hirthbunh, Dovidoon. 9umhlehon - Gravel - $169,000 All of thene ntreeto are poorly conotrtje,nd ronidentiol Area Ccollectors(. Ileconatrise tion to all vsenther slraval would eliminate the exiatinq mud, (Junto and drainage pr©blema. - 10, G. Alinkt 5wi�, tli(ihhunit -Gravel - $654, f)A Thean are oloo poorly consstrurtod otreoto to be upgraded to an all weathssr (gravel surface, Thane are important collectors that would b000sno heavily used through otrooto connoctincl to the Spur Hiqhway, 11, Main Street Loop urthoun(t) - Pavinq $389,000 This( project wocild reensiat,ruct, a narrow, poorly drained street connecting the Spur Highwny and Willow Stront. Thin atroet norven the Courthouna, Library, Public Safety Buildinn, City Iloilo and ssovernt huninon000. ' 12, Airport, VehicIn Parking - Pavisiq - $472.11M) The grssvel long tersno nhort term, rosntal rnr and ssrnpinyee parkinq areas; at the Airport Termiaal are in need of privin(I Russ to drainage and duf;t problefnss, Thin world grrsstly improve and 1911hanre this nnw terminal ogpssnqion and renovation currently under . gon(st r(lrt Lon, r " Y i iI J ♦ 3 i 4 • 3� t - -- - 13, Roll Park Improvements $150,0.00" Thin project would provide dugnutn, rentrooma, fencing, and iniocellaneoun other improvomento to otir exiatinq heavily used ballfielda and parka. Softball in very popular and an important ti f th d d It lik i K t pall me or you an a u o n e n ens . 14, Old Town - Pnving - $397,OOt1 Several streeta in the old part of Kenai are in need of povinq and reconstruction. Thin could add additional area for buninenn expansion. 15, Extend N. Taxiway -at Airport - t1,500.000 The first, of several large airport improvement prejeetn. The airport is a very important part of the local economy and providoo an 0000ntial oorviee for the entire Poninoula. o " F � C suggested Ity: CITY O 1: K I's NA I RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 139 CIty Council A RESOLUTION OF TILE COUNCIL. OF Till? CITY OF KENAI, AI.ASKA, REQUESTING STATE. OF ALASKA FUNDING THROUGH TILE GOVERNOR'S Btji)rPT ON BADLY Nimmil) PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES TI(AT ARE USni) EXI-ENSIVELY BY PnOPLP THROUGHOUT THE KENAI PENINSULA, ANCHORAGE, AND Tl1R STATE OF ALASKA, BUT ARE MAINTAINED, OPERATED, AND SUPPORTED SOLL'LY BY THE CITY OF KENAI. Sti11EREAS, there are many facilities inside the City of Kenai that are used extensively by people throughout the Kenai Peninsula, Anchorage, and the State of Alaska, and WIIEREAS, those same facilities have unrestricted use and without additional charge to individuals who live outside the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, those same facilities are maintained, operated, and supported solely by the City of Kenai even though they are benefiting individuals throughout the State, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding support for the following: 1.) Library Addition - $600000. This facility has 7,121 cardholders with a yearly circulation of 69,000 items, Close to one half of the cardholders are from outside of the City. The facility is extremely overcrowded and in need of this expansion. 2.) Extend Airport Apron - $2.75 Million. The airport facility had a 17,00 paasunger use last year with an expected 200,n00 this year. Thi:, is a 60 percent increase over the last two years. There was G to S million pounds of fi:tl% flown into the airport last year from all areas of the State including; Kotzebue Sound, Norton Sound (Nome and Unalaklect), Ktigkokwim Day (Bethel), Bristol Bay (Dillingham and Naknel'.), Prince William Sound (Cordova), and Gulf of Alaska (Yakutat). 3.) Harbor Bulkhead, Dred iiand Boat Ram - $1.7S Million. This; facility ltrov d e:; iaervice oar Tint co%►ur;erc►alattd P casure boating; to people, a majority of which live outside the City of Kenai. 4.) Float Plane Hasin - $1 .0 'Million, The exi:;ting; float plane b:t:din si aicdi'i u::tt :since t tc al rpm ort tower cannot ::ee the titter. The fund:; would be used to open up a %:;►ter runur.ty and float plane Parking area. The facility would pot exten::ive ;t:;e from luutter:t and fi:thermcri from across the Inlet and the Alaska Peninsula. It would al:;o relieve the heavily overcrowded condition, in the Anchorage area. q I �J d Resolution No. 82 - 139 e NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 1-118 COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF KENAI , ALASKA$ that the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding through the Governor's budget on the badly needed projects of: 1.) Library Addition - $600,000 2.) Extend Airport Apron - $2.75 Million_ 3.) Harbor Bulkhead, Dredging, and Boat Ramp - $1.75 Million 4.) Float Plane Basin - $1.0 Million AND, BF IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of the Resolution be sent to Governor Bill Sheffield, the newly appointed DOT/PF Commissioner, the nowly appointed Commissioner of Education, and to each member of the 1983 State Legislature. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this l5th day of December, 1982. 66 . 'CH ATTEST: net 11holan, City Mark v l_. - - - , OF— f'wiY`......a.. January 17, 1n113 CITY OF KENAI "Od eapdaC 4 Azd a// P. O. OOX $80 91NA1, AtAVA 99611 ftttPNOMt 11113 • 7433 Honorable gill Sheffield Governor, Stpte of Alanka Pouch A Juneau, Alackn 99811 Subjects City of Kenai 1983 - 84 Cuflital Improvement Projects Dear Governor Sheffield: The City of Kenai willheo to ronaratulate you on your recent election as Governor. T11a player, Cotlnailmembern, And City Manoger look forward to 'workinq with you dtlrintf this upcoming logislature In explaining the City of Kr!noi'a Psoitiona on different innur,,, 1,11i,1 se feel free to contact the Mayor,. Any Councilitlw;iher, or my+self if yell evlsr tlnve any queotiona or colaslento concerninri till! City of Kenal. Encloued in thu bror:huru untitl"J'- nf;ity of Kenai, Alanktl 1903 - 914 capil'nl fmptrsvl•fnnitt. 11rojectts. fieluef;t far it,at.t! nrantw' The Cit•v an 0 n11111a, i inr,lllflin't thf• r,it "ellry tt►rutlllh Plltil it work tinfltSinnfl and hoslrintlrl) has aerlwfi very haul in fluvelslPintf thifs brorlulru. ttIIS Patst Prn,ir.r,t.s SstfrlA a hi:;tnry of llv+ l tilt' City of 14.ltflat hats wI,-'J'l V t1 wif oftr (1:t tlt tl t'nflt:s, All the f1111�1:i t/1! t1 :1V t' rflceIveil in 1,11/s hoot 31'" 1,"mittr'ff, hill l..fl► cnnjflc road 11rojectn, t'Itft ff11111'1 of, V1161'l1 Isart' t f't:f• ivt'ti from t.lt•? h'1VN 111•NI► 1!•!cillttlNff :1111f :Iltt t.n f'la in t'-1r1% ITur rl?ltrirt� '/llry7:•S t ft:tt i/ff"t1 qt' R'ti: fill. '111 1'9ltrovr•!9••flt . ew fl:►vp tftrg1111111y t111fi r al'1!ftll l ► t,tllliwo t Ullr rt'tlll—st ntit %!riff do indoted n/f/fd th'►r lftl:►rff Vf•tnit/lt, it ftlrt,'lt'r :ahnw'; ill:lt ill• .11"? Pf•'11:1rNtt to !;r)'ljllr'II! th.st i'tnrovl•ttft•nt i:'I t'tt!t!l;t!f'1V thllt; a:lV1f1f1 rl'tfl,leit:fl•, 6'it''l�.!(Sf! Ittl:, I +jr'17511': t`.if? !!f 7f't:';, :Ili:f rfi Vr'1As3itt'1 Or :11't/ratSltl; Itr(t:11:. 'if•CLif''"'. I , i �I 0 The Future PrOentrs Priority in the 1983 - 14 priority Iint that ths► City of Kenai is presently rpcpsentinq grant funds from the State of Alanka. The City of Kenna in nnxintsa to qet started on those pro.jectn and in prenently having the enginnerinq design work done on projects 1, 2, and 4. We are usinn other funds for this onginaerinq no that we will be ready to immediately start construction once we receive the State funcfa. It is hopeful that we can get those projects completed this fall (1903). The numbern on the City map located on the beck pane of the brochure eorronpondo to the project number of our future Projects Priority list. Ploano keep thin brochure handy and feel free to request as many copies of it no you'd like. I am sure you will find this brochure helpful when caked "Whet dean the City of Kenai have planned for it's Capital Improvements?" or "What did the City of Kenai do with the funds we have already given them?" Aqain, please call if you ever have any questions or comments eoncerninq the City, or if there is anything that the City of Kenai can do for you. Sincerely, - •� 'LA. flri ton City Manager Enclosure WJSskh i 3 J-' 1 'fT i � J .I I� I i ,I CITY OF KENAI add 014" ►. 0. SOX NO KENAI, AtA$XA 19611 1"IFN0111E 210 - 1#3E September 29, 1983 -- MEMORANDUM WE Kenai City Council FROM: Kenai Advisory Parks i Recreation Commission Kayo McGillivray, Director SUBJECTS Capital improvement Requests for Consideration -- At a work session Tuesday evening, September 27th, the Commission prepared the following prioritized list for your considerations 1) BIKE TRAILS - from Tinker to 0460,000 Swires and along Redoubt from Forest to Spur Highway * FOR CONSIDERATION: A bike trail from Kenai to Soldotna via Kalifornski Beach Road to be funded by the Department of Transportation. Cost Unknown 2) BEACH PATH - engineering $ 10,000 3) RVANOS CREEK TRAIL EXTENDED - $100000 jogging and cross country skiing I I I I - -�' 7-1 CITY OF KENAI "all C;apd 1 4 4"a„ /, O, IOX 010 KINAL AM19A 09611 T/L1/140MI 183 • MA Memo tos Kenai City Council from$ C. A. Brown Subjects Annual Leave Dates 10-20-83 Below is a recap of the significant annual leave policies as they appear in 9MC 23.40.030. 1 urge the Council to road that section themselves to gain a full understanding of the provisions. Annual leave is @&rood as follows& Years of Service Hours Earned/Mo. 0-2 16 3-S 18 6-10 20 11- 22 These are the hours earned for regular 40-hour per week employees (8 hours is one day). Croups of employees who work more than 40 hours, earn more; but when they take time off, the leave account is depleted at a faster rate, Aloof if they cash in leave, their hourly rate is proportionately seduced, so the benefits are the same for all groups, For instance, a beginning 40-hour per week employee earns 16 hours per month. That is 4.8 weeks per year (16 x 12 / 40). A firefLghter earns 22.4 hours per month and works a 56-hour week. That also is 4.8 weeks per year (22.4 x 12 / 56). KMC 23.40.030(d) contains a provision that, at the end of each calendar year, an employee may not carry forward to the next year more than the equivalent of two weeks of leave time multiplied by the number of years of City service, to the nearest quarter, For a 40-hour per weak employee, thin means that if he has 2 years of service at December 31, 1983, the most he can carry to January, 1904, is 160 hours (80 x 2). If he has any leave in oxeess of tb4t, the City pays him at his current Pay rate. There is another provision that sets an overall cap for each group of employees, This is 640 hours for regular 40-hours per week employees, This amounts to 16 weeks. A proportionate cap exists for the other groups (more hours, but still 16 weeks of time). Again, amounts in excess of that cap are also paid in cash. 1 i a f , , 0 Every employee must take 2 weeks off per year, or they will loan the time with no compensation. %cap in mind that there is no sick time vs. vacation time, it's all leave, This is not an accident. Ttse employees seem to like this arrangement, and so does the administration. As a rule, we earn fewer hours combined than cities where they keep them saparats. But, we have fewer unscheduled absences under our method. There is no incentive for an employee to Call in sick ae he nears termination, That is basically the leave policy. Now for the proposed ordinance, which is to eliminate the 2 Capn. We'll take them one of a time. The 2-Week Rule This is the carryover limit Calculated annually (2 weeks times number of years). Unless an employes takes a lot of time off, he's virtually ossured of getting paid some of his leave time. Vow example, late look at a 40-hour per week employee during his third years Max, leave at start of year (80 x 2) 160 Earns in 3rd year (18 x 12) 216 max. leave at and of year (80 x 3) <240> Hours he must use to avoid payment This means he must take off 3.4 (136 / 40) weeks that year, or he'll get paid for some of his time. He can't just take a 2-week vacation and let the other 56 hours stay on the books. The Overall Cap itulo This cap is pretty simple, and is common among municipalities (I've never heard of the other one -- the 2-week rule), For a 40-bour per week employee, he simply can't accrue more than 640 hours.• in affect, this makes the first rule moot after 8 years (80 x 8 ■ 640). Let's look at Exhibit 1, What I've done here is prove that the City does normally earn a higher intarest rate than the rate of pay increases given to employees, On an average, we earn 2% more, Let's took at Exhibit 2. This Exhibit Compares the eost.of an employee's leave over S years with and without the 2-week rule cap. The assumptions are: 1) Its starts work on January 1, and quits on December 31, exactly S years later, 2) interest earnings exceed raises by 2%. F] I I , I H r.. 3) lie always takes off exactly 2 weeks per year. The result is that with the caps in place, it costs the City $154 more over the 5-year period. This is clearly immaterial, so let's say the costs are the same. (By the way, I computed it again using the same interest rate as the pay increase rate, and they're virtually identical in cost.) Recommendations •(A) I recommend that the City eliminate the 2-weak rule. The reasons for this arcs 1) This cap severely limits the amount of leave that an employee may keep on the books in his early years of employment. Since our leave is also used as sick leave, it doesn't seem rational to force the employee to cash out leave in his early years of employment. 2) This cap places a irestriction on the employcee and takes time to administer, but provides no savings to the City. (B) I'm going to back off on recommending elimination of the overall cap (the 640-hour cap for 40-hour par week employees). Conceptually, the same arguments apply here as they d,2 above. however, there is one consideration that had not occurred to me before. If we have no overall limit, we could have an employee accrue a very large number of hours, let's say 2,000. Than, if that employee received a promotion or pay range increase that significantly increased his pay, let's say by 05.00 per hour, he would carry all of his accrued leave at his new pay. This moans the City would fund the increase (:n this case 010,000) in the year of the promotion. I'm sure this sort of thing would be rare, but is a good argument for keeping the overall cap. The ordinance was written eliminating both caps. If Council agrees with these recommendations, we will change the ordinance accordingly. CAB/aa ... 3 Y . I t Cob%J1w 'j, so I opt Rq, I" I'do A, I.--, e., —4� w ro C04 A lwr;t, 0, (v Op, �Jv tj L�11- 71, t7, (#) A... 4,. 1 L I.;-!L !I. Is 1. i IT, lip" ,e�....s� ,� ! ,: � _ , T � 'j j • i ,_' I � . _.�.:.:_�_.._._.._____ � _,r._.1.'fA Yf�t,c__1_rc�,c�. _Yt�rR_ �roAR._ _,_.._.._.--�•------- -�-• � vt..... /law./. P•�;J..,,-.l./i,. _ 1 ,I � � � .% `� �' ��I6.� j` �I �• _ 1- � r j w t7n1/il�'>r lnrwti_�/.� ii �j ' !, � ' �.. ! _.'�•• I _�# 1 �j.. .. �� � --�: I �of Box 1200 KENAI PENINSULA 001101JOI-I SCHOOL DISTRICT i i t OTNA, AIAfKA 99669 4J ^o 0 August 9, 1983 ra PH. 264.8846 OF1Z.rl" 4 Mayor Ron Malston ' City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 i Kenai, AK 99611 i Dear Mayor Malston; I am corresponding with you in regard to the future development of Section 36, Kenai. I realize that your decisions have not been finalized in regard to development of this parcel of land. Nevertheless, it appears that it might be appropriate to touch base with you regarding the potential of a future school site within this parcel. ! As you know, we are continually looking ahead toward future school population increases. Selection of potential school sites are essential in order to be prepared for future school needs. In this regard, if it is appropriate, I would like the City Council to consider the possibility of designating 15 acres as a site for an elementary school within Section 36. Thank you for your consideration. ; I Sincerely, Fred Pomeroy Superintendent FP/bj ' cc: fir. Hobart ANtNW POW coati'AN01NG iNGUM #AV NOAttt "M XIMM MOOR PAU NIIIOt"VAK gilrilc�YK UMN SINAI Pon G"NAM UtMVSA $[WARD fotMNA [TAMING tuitYMIXA twangs 0 n. ' Kwsui Chumlwr of Couiuwnw Box 497 Kenai. Alujoku 11 Jh11 119 UAPITAL ESOLUTION NO. 8 -12 A RGREATER KENA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE URGING THEIL TO TAKE OSITIVE ACTION RELATIVE TO SPEJECTS THAT OULD FURTHER ENHANCE OUR COMMUNITY. WHEREAS, the Kenai City Cou it has prepared a list of Capital Projects for consideration, and WHEREAS, the Kenai City C ncil must select specific projects; for submission for requess a for grant funds from the State of Alas3ka, and WHEREAS, the existing 1 at documents many projects that would be of great benefit to the community, and WHEREAS, due to limit d funds available from the State of Alaska, it is of utm at importance to prioritize the list, and WHEREAS, the Kenai hamber of Commerce has; reviewed the list and find that thre projects would be of great benefit to the citizens, to the f ture growth and development of the City and to the Greater Ke ai Area, and WHEREAS, the Ken i Chamber of Commerce'ss main function is to support and prom to the orderly development and on -going growth of the communit , NOW, THEREFORE OF, IT RESOLVED that the Greater Kenai Chamber of Commerce hereb urges the Kenai City Council to proceed with efforts for o taining funding from all pertinent sources that will enable constr etion of the following direly needed projectns (1) Library Expansion, (2) Kenai Municipal Airport Float Plane Basin, and 3) Kenai Harbor proponed development. BE IT FURTH R RESOLVED that the Greater Kenai Cliamber of Commerce encourages he construction and development of ether projects as listed on he Capital Projects Liut az funding becomes; available. PASSED BY THE GREATER KEUAI CHAMBER OF CcrvaRCE this; 21sst day of October, 983. Eugene Collir.z, President a . wr 1 l I. CAPITAL IMPROVENNT PROJKCTH (CIP) 1984-85 PRRIAMINARY ROUGH PROJECT COST HST. X 01000 E 1. Standard, Richfield, 300 Thompson Place - G •2. Library Addition 700 P. 3. Spruce, Second, i Third - P Boo 4. VIP - Lora, Ounriao, Ketch - O S00 P. S. Lake, Marine, Granite Point, 900 P.B.O., Main Street Loop - P 6. S. Highbuoh, Davidson, Bumblobae - 0 180 7. g. Aliak, Swiree, tfighbuoh - 0 700 8. Old Town - P 400 *9. Extend N. Taxiway Airport 1,600 #10. Extend Main Apron Airport 2,700 *11. Beaver Creek Fire Station 280 *12. Ski/Orals/Dirt Strip Airport 220 •13. Float Plane Basin Airport 1,100 *14. Runway Extension Airport 9,500 *15. Harbor/Bulkhead, Dredging, Bostramp 1,900 •16. Beach Path 10 17. Robin, Kenaitxe, Eagle Rock, 300 Sandpiper, Tern, Strawberry S. - 0 10. Alpine - 0 70 19. Juliusnen, !Imes, 750 earabara, Angler - 0 a20. Camping Arts S00 #21. Bike Trails - Tinker to Swires 460 Redoubt - forest Dr. to Spur Also mentioned but not decided upon •A. Addition to City Hall S00 B. Spruce Street Paving - Spur to Beach 400 •C. Community Center - Multi -purpose 4,000 #D. RV Camper hark - Spruce i Beach Soo E. Cook Inlet Viow Orivo s Lilac Street 600 •F. Beach Path Engineering to •0. Ryan'a Creek Trail Extended too *Means thia project will coat they City additional money to operate and maintain aftor it is completed. All other projecte will coat the City lean money than it does now. P 42LIMI A Y y _ - CIIAPTi,R a DEMAND ANAL,Y€iIS An accurate forecast of the probable iovel of use of the boat harbor is an ouuontial componont of tho planning, design and financial foasibility of the facility. The proposed harbor must respond to demands from both the commercial and recreational boat population. 8reviouo studios have estimated a demand for as many an 400 berths for com- mercial fiohing boats and up to 100 slips for recreational craft (ref. �, , �y. The following analysis reviews existing small boat activity in the lower Kenai River, and examines separately the potential iovelo of commercial and recreational demand. 0 a w . i THE FXINTING COMMPAWIAL NI€HING l'141,3i'' The -Salmon i''lovt The Konai area nalmon (loot in comp000d primarily of drift gilinot vossola and small sot not boats as well as a few larger purse seine vessolo over 32 foot in length. The majority of the boats are owned by residents of Kenai or local cannorios as well no residents of nearby central Kenai Peninauia commu- nities. A significant number of other boats (approximately 60) are owned by residento of Anchorago and the Seattle area. Each summer the lowor Kenai River is jammed with commercial fishing craft awaiting their chance to work the Cook Inlot salmon runs from Snug Harbor to The Porolanda, In accordance with state onforeod idle periods (usually five days/week to balance escapement for apawning and sportfishing with commer- cial harvests) the commercial fioot anchors in the mainstream of the lower Kenai River. During winter months local boats are dry stored at the cannorios or private lots while others sail or are trailored from the aroa, There are a total of 1346 limited entry gill not permits for the Cook Inlet salmon registration area. Of these, 599 (414 resident and 160 non-resident) are drift gill not permits and 747 (688 resident and 51 non-resident) are set not permits. Cook Inlet waa divided into two zoparote management areas in 1974 and Uppor Cook inlet dominates the nalmon harvest, ac- counting for an average of 79% of the total annual inlet catch. ©rift gear is not allowed into the lower Cook Inlat management area or in the Northern District of the tipper Cook inlet management area, Set net activity in allowed in both the (Upper and Lowor Cook Inlet management areas but is vory limited in the Lowor Cook inlet area. Ac a roault moat oalmon gill not harvesting occurs in the Upper Cook inlet Area and Kenai is the 2-2 1 Y � n center of thin activity. flowover, not all permita are fished. It is reported that during the 1982 aeano n, 576 of the 598 drift permits and only 585 of the 747 not net permito were fiahed. Moreover, while Kenai is the baoo of the operations for moot of the boats active in the fishery, a number of boats operate from Homer, Ninilchik, Kaoilof, ono other locations. The Commercial Pioherios Entry Comminaion (CPP.C) ves30e1 files list a total of 680 commercial boats that rogiater Kenai as homeport, and an additional 255 commercial boats baoed in Soldotna. Th000 boats includes 1) boato having commercial permits for the Cook inlet salmon not registration area; 2) boats having commercial permits for salmon net registration aroaa other than Cook inlets and 3) commercial boats other than salmon boats, including th000 active in other fisheries, river guide boats, and other boats; licensed by Alaoka Department of fish and Game (ADFkG) that are used for commercial purposes. As shown in Table 2-1, approximately 458 local commercial boats holding permito for The Cook Inlet Salmon Net Registration Area operate from the lower Kenai River, in addition, there are approximately 60 non -local vessels that operate out of Kenai during the peak of the salmon season, Demand fvr Gioorage. Of the boats that operate from the Kenai are& during fishing season (both reoidont and non-resident boats) it is unlikely that all veGoels would use (and be willing to pay for) harbor elips. At the present time moat boats anchor in the channel during closures and a significant number would continuo to do so unions prohibited by the Crust Guard, Other boats tie up at various cannery decks, For example, Columbia Wards Fisheries provides a transient float that some 60 boats are able to raft at free of charge, A. bezt lift for emergency haul Out rerviees aloo is available, Similar services are provided at other cannery facilities. 2-3 `w U TABLE: 2-1 Commercial Fleet Based in the Lower Kenai River* Kenai Soldotna Size (Ft.) A 1 8 C Total A 8 C Total <18 31 0 54 85 13 1 48 62 18 - 25 148 3 143 294 42 1 116 159 26 - 35 189 40 36 265 15 9 6 30 36 - 45 17 5 9 31 1 0 1 2 46 - 60 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 >60 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Length given 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Totals 387 48 245 680 71 1 11 1 173 255 *Based on CFEC homeport registrations. included in the above figurea are those boats with no listed homeport, but whose owners give either Kenai or Soldotna as a home address. it is assumed that Kenai or Soldotna is also the homeport for the vessel. NOTESs A a Boats having commercial permits for the Cook inlet Salmon Net Registration Area 8 = Boats having commercial permits for salmon net registration areas other than Cook inlet C = Commercial boate other than salmon permit boats Sources CFEC Vessel License Listing File (1983) 2-4 J i i �. 4.-_ >-rii-T .r!iri� rr�� -'rt„I- - '.. . , '• � iM i �+. �-Y .�.. ., I .�1 .., r.r, - _ {. . _ 'NNw J riehing indunt:ry trendo r.how a tarowing movement by f ishermen to an independent or cooperative operation. Ths,s entails a break in the traditional link botwof-n processor and the fist,erinen whereby dry rt•oraye, ice, moorage and other services ware provided to the fisherman as part of his agreement to sell to a particular processor. Although those cervices are not paid for directly, their cost is reflected in the price the fishermen receive for their catch. It has bean estimated, for example, that the cost of such processor -provided sorviceo is reflected by a price differential of about S.05-$0.15 per pound for Alaskan sockeye salmon. where alternative facilities are provided, fishermen can sell directly to a cash buyer and make arrangements for their own moorage and support services. A public harbor in Kenai with good fish unloading and berthing facilities could therefore be expected to attract some of the boats that currently rely on process;or-provided services. As a reault, it is estimated that of the 459 local and 60 non-reoident boats operating from Kenai that are registered to participate in the Cook Inlet salmon fishery, approximately 155 (about 30%) would use permanent slips, about 103 boats would tie up at a transient rafting area in a protected basin, while the remaining 200 boats would continue to use private facil- ities at cannery docks or anchor in the river at no out-of- pocket cost. The size mix of these boats can be expected to be proportionally similar to the entire fleet as shown on Table 2-1. In addition to those boats registered to fish in Cook Inlet, 48 Kenai homeport boats and 11 Boldotna boats are licensed to participate in other salmon registration areas throughout the state (primarily Bristol Kay). These boats would not require harbor space in Kenai, although a few might be vripected to return to Kenai or Soldotna to be dry rtored during the off season. Boats; from other areas, however, do operate from Kenai during the peak of the nalmsn scanon and a percentage of these would require transient slips. 2-5 T 4� Other Commercial coats In addition to the salmon fleet, there are 418 other commercial boats in the Konai-Soldotna area. These boats are either engaged in other fisheries (primarily halibut), commercial sport fishing, or are river guide boats. Mpny of these boats operate from private facilities on the river and a large number of the remainder are trailerable and require only launching facilities. it is estimated that about 10% (42 boats) can be expected to lease permanent slips, another 20% (84 boats) at any time during the season would desire transient space, while the remaining 70% would continue to use other facilities. 2-6 i I i I THE : FUTURE COMMERCIAL FLEET Traditional ffp ciea By limiting the number of permita issued the Commercial Fish- eries Entry Comminaion WHO effectively limits the number of boats that are allowed to operate in the Cook inlet nalmon and herring coo fisheries. Limited entry also is boing consid- ered for the halibut fishory, but has not yet boon adopted. While CFEC could increase or decrease (through a buy-back program) the number of permits, it is unliKeiy any oigniticant change will be instituted. The number of boats active in the limited entry fisheries is therefore expected to remain esson- tiaily constant. It is aloo unlikely, due to excess existing capacity, that commercial boats active in fisheries which are not limited by CFEC could be added to the floot. Nearly all commercial fishing voocals active in the Kenai area are primarily drift gilinetters or sot gilinotters with some small seining veaaols. To the extent that species other than salmon are harvested by the Kenai based (loot, such harvesting activity is primarily done by salmon boots that would otherwise be inactivo. in short, other species are harvested only as a oupplomental activity to the salmon harveot. As a result, the Harvesting of traditional species in not expected to add any oignificant number of additional commercial fishing bostc to the existing fleet. 2-7 0 , Bottom Finhory/ rsdordevel©pod F inher. !en Cook inlet groundfish activity to date has boan limited to casual part-time efforts as supplements to the salmon fishory, end a few experimental efforts. Two distinct fleets have engaged in the groundfish harvests: small boats (typically less than 45 feet in length) and a large boat trawl floet (typically shrimp trawlers and converted crabbers ranging in length from 45 feet to over 65 foot). Several trial fishories and studios of bottomfirsho ry develop- ment potential have produced mixed signals regarding ronource availability, projected harvest volumes, the timing of ouch developments and the number of boats likely to participate in such activity. However, certain patterns do appear to emerge that provide a basis for projecting the impact any groundfish harvesting activity might have on the size of the Kenai fieot. There are many uncertainties about the ability of groundfiuh stocks to sustain commercial harvostaf uncertainties that can only be resolved by actual commercial fishing over a period of years. Even though a stock may be abundant in the beginning, and thus provide commercially attractive catch rates, after a few years stock abundance may decline and catch rated may no iongor be profitable. This could be true even if the stock were managed for maximum long term suotainable yieido because the stock abundance that yields maximum sustained yield nor- mally resulto in lower catch rates than do virgin stocks. Thin observation would, of course, only apply to stocks of ground- fiah inaide 12 miles which have been protected from foreign trawling for many yearn. Other pr®blsms include seasonal variations in abundance which peocludo year-round fishing, or zo axonal variations in flesh quality related is npawning peritds. A100, parasites may be 2-8 i i 0 prosent, although thin is a problem which often declines in importance after a commercial fishery removes the virgin stock. On the other hand, average size of fish may decline as fishing proceeds. As some groundfish species, particularly polloek, are already considered "small" by industry standards, this could be an increasingly serious problem. Available data concerning the relative abundance of groundfish resourcou (Pacific cod, poilock, rockfish, flatfish and cable - fish) within the Cook Inlet management area indicate greater concentrations of most underutilized species in the lower Cook Inlet areas. Consequently, the potential for significant harveats may be more within the range of homer and Seldovia than for the Kenai fleet. Market price plays a more dominant role than resource avail- ability in the development of a groundfishery, although both are intercalated. At bast, the margin between present whole- sale prices and production costs (harvesting, processing, transportation and marketing) will be thin. Limited activity to date confirms: that present prices do not allow Alaska groundfish production to be profitable without subsidies. Future price projections vary among sources. in genorai, present prices would need to Increase on the order of 259 for a shore -based procosssinq operation to attain economic feasi- bility. Off -shore production appears more feasible. in either cacao, it zooms reasonable to conclude that any larger - scale bottomfish development awaits higher prices. As a result, for the purpose of projecting the future fleet of commercial fisahing vessels at Kenai, it is not anticipated that groundfish harvesting activity will bring additional vessels to the existing fleet in the near term. Should some of the more optimistic projections of groundfish dovelopment occur, perhaps 2-9 some additional invontment in fishing VURBala for harvesting could be juatifiedf however, the total number of vessels to be added to the (loot under such conditiona would be most likely loss than five. It appoara more rrraliatic to aaaume that any furthor group©fish harvesting activity from Kenai will be limited to participation by existing veaoolo,that will continue to be uaod primarily in the harvest of traditional species. I • i OW y 1 ' t�. _ Y RECREATIONAL BOATING ACTIVITY Recreational boating activity in Southeentral Alaska can be divided into two major categoriess saltwater/coastal boating and freshwater/inland boating. For the purpose of determining planning criteria for a harbor at Kenai, it is necessary to consider these two recreational activities and the extent to which participating boats could be expected to utilize the proposed harbor facilities. Saltwater/Coastal Recreational Boatin Saltwater recreational boating in Southcentral Alaska is dominated by activity in the Prince William Sound, Resurrec- tion Ray and Kachemak Bay areas centered from the small boat harbors located at Whittier, Seward and Homer. Most of the existing activity is generated by Anchorage residents. Some recreational saltwater boating activity does occur in Cook Inlet from the Kenai River mouth area, although pleasure boating activities (primarily for saltwater fishing) in the area are hampered by extreme tidal ranges and tidal currents, murky water, shoals and various; obstructions. The bars at the entrance to the river are nearly dry at low water, thus local knowledge, careful planning in accordance with daily tide schedules, and good judgement are important safety require- ments. A study conducted for the Kenai Peninsula Borouqh in 1980 projected a potential need for an additional 2100 small boat slips by the year 1990 to serve the saltwater recreational boating demands of the Anchorage market plus local markets on the Kenai Peninsula (ref. ,_). These slip requirements were allocated to Seward, Homer and Whittier, although it was recognized the allocation was inexact, "to the extent that an appreciable portion of the total demand is probably sensitive to supply, and thus capable of zhifting among these harbors - or even to new harbors.". 2-11 Seward, Whittier and particularly homer are planning to expand their harbors in response to the significant waiting lists for slips at each facility. homer, for example, is currently expanding its harbor to include about 925 new berths. A private marina to eventually include 500 slips also is being developed in Seward as a part of the Brigantine Bay resort. A public small boat harbor in Kenai could reasonably be ex- pected to draw a number of pleasure boats in the market area. Although the recreational boating experience is considered to be superior in Kachemak Bay, Resurrection Bay and Prince William Sound, a harbor at Kenai would serve a portion of local resident boat owners as well as a number of Anchorage boat owners that would prefer the shorter traveling distance to Kenai than to Homer. A review of data presented in the Alaska Outdoor Recreational Plan (1961) concerning boat ownership and freshwater/saltwater use patterns relative to driving distance, As well as discussions with selected boat dealers, boat owners, and Kenai residents indicates that it would be reasonable to expect that 50 to 100 recreational boat owners; would lease seasonal harbor slips at Kenai if they were available. In addition to the number of existing recreational boats in the market area, there is a general consensus that a significant latent demand exists as well. Experience at other coastal communities indicates that as the availability of slips in- creases the percentage of households in the market area owning boats increases as well. Moreover, as harbor slip availability increases existing boat owners with trailerable boats tend to upgrade to larger boats. As an initial development, it is recommended that 60 slips be provided, with the harbor layout planned to accommodate future expansion. Boat sizes; are expected to be consistent with present fleet mix distributions, modified to stoma extcat by trends indicating a greater future proportion of recreational boats in the 24 to 35-foot class. 2-12 ar y ,w Proghwator/inland RacrQat-ional-,isoatinQ The Kenai River is the most important sport fishing stream in Alaska - accounting for 13% of all sport fishing effort in recent years. Approximately 75% of the effort involves the use of boatst either fishing from them or to gaAn access to shore fishing spots. Boat traffic in the river has increased dramatically in the last decade, bringing congestion at some favocod fishing spots, degradation of the river by eroded banks, increased sedimentation, and conflicts with shore fishermen. Upon recommendation from the Kenai River Task Force, the Board of Fisheries has imposed restrictions on Kenai River users which include banning the use of boats on certain days. Other Coateietions considered but not enacted include motorboat horsepower limitations, boat speed limits and hull design criteria. As the issue of environmental protection along the Kenai gains importance, these and other boating restrictions will no doubt be reconsidered. Because the best Kenai River fishing is located upstream of the lower 10 miles of the stream, boat launching or mooring faeil- 4�> sties at Kenai would be somewhat distant for report fishermen. Some sections of the tidal influenced portion of the river can also be difficult to navigate at low tides for all but very 3 experienced operators or those with the shallowest draft boats. For instance, with normal river flow the stretch just down- stream of the Warren Ames Bridge is little more than a foot deep at ito deepest point during lower tides. Although there are no public moorage facilities; from river mile 10 to 21, where most Kenai sport fishing is clone, there are several privately operated launch sites available. At the present time gcveral public and private launching facilities are located along the river at such locations as Swift water 2-13 w 0 io .r 1 Campground (Mile 23), Centennial Park (Mile 21), Rivercide Campground (Mile 16.5), Union Oil Recreation Facility (Mile 16), Eagle Rock (Mile 11.5), Cunningham Park (Mile 6), and the City of Kenai Ramp (Mile 1.5). Boat launching facilities also are being considered for the Bing's Landing State Recreational Area, and the Salamatof Native Association have recently applied for a permit to construct twelve 12' x 40' boat launch ramps approximately four miles oast of Soldotna. _- To reach the popular fishing area known as Big Eddy from the i City of Kenai launch site, a 16-mile boat trip is needed. However, to trailer a boat to any of the several existing launch facilities at Big Eddy involves only a 6-mile drive from Kenai on well maintained roads and highways. W i In light of the distance by water travel from the Kenai harbor n site to preferred river sport fishing areas, as well as exist- ing and proposed management policies regarding the use of power boats on the Kenai River, it is inadvisable to plan u Additional wet moorage for a Kenai small boat harbor for the use by river sport fishing vessels. improvement of the ex- isting ramp with dry storage and upland parkinq for vehicles ; and trailers should adequately accommodate the needs of recre- ational river boats. The nearly exclusive use of the first _'r R several miles of the Kenai River by saltwater fishing boats is a trend expected to continue and should therefore be accom- modated in facilities planning. 2-14 0 DEMAND SUMMARY Table 2-2 presents the estimated demand by vessel type and size mix for a public small boat harbor at Kenai. it is expected that there will be only minimal growth in the number of com- mercial boats over tho next 20 years due to limited entry in the salmon and herring fisheries, and rorource availability and market price trends in the bottomfish species. However, the long range plan for the boat harbor should accommodate the potential for a significant increase in the number of indopen- dent commercial fichormon requiring the use of a non -processor owned moorage and service facility. Recreational boating in southcontral Alaska is expected to continue to grow in relation to population and income growth. The percentage of new recreational boats that will use a small boat harbor at Kenai will depend largely on the availability or, more accurately, the unavailability of slips at Seward, Whittier and homer. As a result it is recommended that flexi- bility and expansion potential be important factors in the planning of a harbor facility so that as the demand for addi- tional recreational slips increases in the future, harbor expansion is possible, AD an initial development phase, it is recommended that the proposed small boat harbor be sized to accommodate up to 200 commercial bouts and 60 recreational boats at seasonal clips, with adequate floats and mooring areas for rafting approx- imately 200 transient boats. 2-15 .H , �, � _ - - - w-..11. .w w..�'n. r. non • i - �-r' o.. n i . r,� -„ v-w•-o.rTrnw =.]f� - ' r-.:sa,x� - .. TABLE 2-2 ! Kenai Small Boat ffarbor f J --_- ProJeote8 Fleet Mix f Total salmon Boats Other Commeroiai Boat@ Roaro4tion4l Boats ffize/Typs Permanent Transient Permanent Transient Permanent Transient Permanent Transient 4 10 14 6 4 3 18 9 18 - 28 66 44 22 SS 40 - 129 99 26 - 38 71 50 12 22 1S - 90 72 . 36 - 45 4 3 2 2 S - 11 9 i > 45 0 0 2 2 - - 2 2 Totals 163 167 103 42 04 60 - n257 ,y o r� f 1 0 Tablo Rogistere4 Unitu of Qillnot Vinhinq Of fort by Goar Typo in Cook Inlot, 1960-1982* Drift _ not Non- Sub- Non- Glib - Year Rouidont Rouidont total Houidont RoBident total Total 1960 221 67 208 511 59 970 850 1961 279 93 372 564 22 586 950 1962 260 112 372 589 20 W 909 1963 333 139 472 626 34 660 1,132 1964 323 145 468 090 35 631 1,099 1965 329 145 474 556 34 Soo 1,064 1966 328 176 504 580 46 020 1,132 1967 350 196 536 554 50 604 1,140 1968 407 204 611 639 43 681 1,292 1969 497 190 607 686 42 728 1,415 1970 537 220 757 707 65 772 1,529 1971 519 191 710 6193 36 731 1,441 1972 419 152 571 672 35 701 1,272 1973 516 146 662 632 43 775 1,437 1974 459 150 608 764 39 603 1,411 1975 291 162 453 613 44 657 1,110 1976 343 171 514 669 42 711 1,225 1977 360 179 539 690 41 731 1,270 1970 366 189 540 698 44 742 1,291 1979 372 192 554 700 44 744 1,299 1900 373 179 554 697 47 744 1,298 1981 414 185 599 688 59 747 1,346 1982 414 185 Soo 688 y9 747 1,346 1 ' 1975-1982: Limited entry porm it data. t� 7 f 1 , f �I _ t i 2 h v CITY OF KENAI „Od G'd�ltal °�i 4"" /, O. SOX HO KENAI, A/AWA 99611 11UPNON/ toll • Ms September 15, 1963 TOs Mayor and Council of the City of Kenai BRONs Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Worka SUBJECTS Section 36 Bluff - Request for Propooals Enclosed are copies of the proposals received on the above subject project for your review. Proposals were received from the following five firms. McLane and Associates, Inc. Wince, Corthell, Bryson S & 8 Engineers, Inc. Mike Tauriainen, P.P. Professional Design Associates KK/jet I carmen vincent gintoll, architect ` = Don 4625 professional building suite 110 N k Kenai, alas a 99611 907 283.7732 October 25, 1983 Renovation & Expansion of the KENAI POLICE DEPARTMENT Schematic Cost Estimate o, The cost estimate 1s based on a one story masj�? addition with interior lines Y' renovations as noted. The dashed indica items to be demolished; shaded areas of the drawings are the additions. - - Site Development 8200 S.F. Paved Parking ® $3.00 $24,600.00 Addition 3443 S.F. 0 $150.00 $516,460.00 Renovations as indicated $100,000.00 $641,060.00 Construction Contingency 10% $64,105.00 " $105,155.00 y H -=_ Architectural and Engineering 0 10% • $70,516.00670 $$38,783.00 0 *Project Contingency 0 5% 38,83.00 $814,463.00 r * The Project Contingency is allowed to compensate for any administrative costs, surveys, soils investigation which may be required. Promfietd Ronoyfltion of Jail (Without Building Axpannion and Roiovntion) Present Facility (diagrnm attaubod) A. Cell block area conoiato of 904 nquaro foots 4 coils, niwwer, utility chaifses and jnnitorial mop room. Approximately 4f6 square foot of it can be adapted for police purposes. D. Jail ouporvioors office consists of 61 nquaro foot (91xfi'10"). C. Visiting Loom is in two sections ouch Q'x3' with removal of wall between two sections (if possible) this; given additional 80 nquaro foot, Proposals Adapt 627 square foot for police use. A. Use cell 1162 for storage area (i!4 sq. ft.) D. Use cell 1161 and adjoining utility aceena for ovidenoo room (666 eq, ft.) C. Use cell 1185 for ovidonae processing and storage of related equipment. (lbf> sq, ft.) D. Use shower so fuming chamber. Z. Coil 1171 continues a9 a jail coil for temporary holding, P. Janitorial storage remaina as aamo. G, Jail supervisors office used for weapons storage and reloading area. is. Visiting room becomes library. Problems Resolvads A. Present ovidonse safe which is too amali becomoa intarviow roam. D. Ovidenue processing area and eapabilitioa are vantly improved. C. storage problems are addroaaed. D. Reloading, weapons, ammunition and chemical agent storage areas are improved. 2, Library, rouearch, and complaint preparation area is improved and made workable. problems not addrosseds A. ifo lobby area for public or roatroom aceena after bourn. I D. Congestion in Dispatch is not addrunood. This is critical es file airea grow, new alarsa system installed, AJIS114CiC systems installed, etc. C. Office space congestion not addressed. D. squad room still serves too many functions. 1) Mork area for patrolmen 2) Looker and droaaing area 3) Training area - off duty training while duty officers are attempting to work, 4) Lounge - lunchroom area, g) Witness - victim interviews are conducted in thin area. Al Court preparation area - District Attorneys office, witness, victisnss, officers, etc, J a Y.XIIANSInN AN!1 unN0VA,rr(sN OV KTNAT POLICE. L►l�PAR.1.4 NT Proposed space utilization within developmental plan for expansion and renovation. Dispatch Continues as communications -records center. Proposed expannion allows for improving this work area as wall as acceptance of new alarm, com- puter systems, etc, as well an a reception area away from radio and phone traffic. KitKit c Remains same. Dispatchers work 12 hour shifts, often alone and cannot leave work area for meals, snacks, coffee, water, etc.. Lobby Allows for public lobby - waiting area while waiting for friends, family, ate., or awaiting arrival of officer to assist them. Secured from rest of building for aftorhours, etc.. Restrooms Relocated to meet needs of public without opening up other areas of building. Chief'@ office No change - Some items presently stored there would be relocated. Lt.'s office No change - Two (2) desks removed as Patrol Sergeants are relocated. Confer 1. Place to lay out accident scene diagrams, crime steno sketches, flow charts, etc. -without interrupting other work areas for neveral hours at a time. 2. D. A. and other attorneys meet with officers, witnesses,vietims- case discussions. 3. Microfilming work area -camera net up, etc.. 4. Sean meetings, chief meetings, supervisor meetings, etc.. File room Microfilm reader, microfilm files - ;lard copy files in excess of two (2) yearo old that can't be microfilmed (photo, tickets, STYE, log journals, etc.) Forma and paper storage, i to r. 3 E I i -Y a •x, i .S. ` Staff Services Office (1 off icer fulltime) a Supervises communieationa cantor and recorda. Evidence room and handling (to and from lab, court, return to citizen) Property (found - safekeeping) Purchase and supply '. Regulatory compliance Public relations (aehoola, etc.) bicycle safety, etc. Training Special projects. i Staff Loun�s 1. lunch room for officers and dispatchers and others - gets out of work areas. (present use of squad room - multi -purpose) 2. Place for victims of domestic violence - women, kids, etc. to wait in nonpolice atmosphere - not a view - while waiting for placement. 3. Place for off -duty officera and witneaaes to congregate on court days - instead of squad room - not interfere with work. ' Interview Rooms i Suspect and defendant interview rooms - no distractions - bare - table and i chairs - two way mirror capability for lineup purposes. Voice Stress Testing it Sound proof area for voice ntraaa, polygraph, and foranaic hypnosis. Room ,•� decorum is adaptable to need of moment (victim, witness, nuopect) invostinator's Office y Hold present office and files, on aeeno collection equipment, cameras, etc. As department grows could field up to two (2) additional officers. ' UbEIM ' Library, storage of training aida material- - (drug dinplays, study) Complaint preparation area. Patrol Sergeants ' Present two (2) Sergeanta' deaka, filea and related equipment. Would be capable of scolding a third one in the future. _ Squad Room Work area for seven (7) patrolmen - tables, files, drafting table, etc.. Arms-Reloadiqa Weapons, reloading, chemical agent storage, e:r.. Training - Classroom Classroom, physical training area, self defenne training areas - able to V train off -duty people while duty people continue to function. r JAl1. RENOVATION =�-- Storage (nreeent cell 118eU Storage of property hold for nafokeopi►ig, lost and found property, KPD con- trolled property (issued handguns, badges, etc.) Evidence Storage Safe (Cell 1181) If possible to include adjacent utility corridor. To store evidence collected in criminal cases. Evidence ProcoexinA -(Cali 1185) ---- Room with double sinks, eountera, tahloa in which ovidonce processing equip- mont is utilized. Latent work, cleaning of castings, etc. would be done in this room. Coll 1171 Continuos as temporary detention cell. i I i I l j. ! t �I o ; I �w H H Y r R H �M y U I i i u � r V it f- , I- - 'i a I , E t� t 4 r 1 i CITY OF KENA I ALASKA i i 1983-84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT �ww ■ �,dft�w (007)283.7535 ■•r.rsvmmv■ ■ vr• g STATE GRANTS - � OMMipitell � , tt�lw �undpNdt YndNQongaot OraM � ww�MO ;7 — � -Alttwt>s --- - STATE GRANT FUNDING • 1980.81 i 20II8 CsreConter 011101 000 Building Complete 0 8 064 Harbor study OOOA00 Feasibility A 011181lon thud 40% Comp, 23ti,000 Z030 Youth Canto ON0,000 Now Building Complete 0 4" Wolof & @$war 7EOA00 Through Wolion 36 Complete 0 "55 Road ON 2,100A00 Fidslgo 8ubdid1alon Opur Frontage Rd, Complete Compfato 0 0 STATE GRANT FUNDING • 1981.82 sm Road Funds 2,372A00 Candlelight i Linwood Design Phase 25OA00 Municipal Aid 3A313440 N. Dogwood, K Lupine, Phillips Complete 0 SON" Completo 0 Main of, i Barnacle 09%Comploto 0 Forest Dr, i Gill Complete 0 Lawton, Tinker Walker, Rodgers g�,/•Comp, 0 Birch, 41h, let 90% Comp, 0 9nd i 3r0 Complete 0 Bsllrlelds, Youth onion RAW Comer City Park imp. !l0'/Comp, 77A400 m Care Canto► 62A00 Workshop Complete 0 8M AA, To/minal 2=14100 Expansion i Renovation 40% Comp• 160A00 21�8 c4 „un 1A00A00 New Building 70%Comp, 80A00 STATE GRANT FUNDING •1982.83 i 474 Road Funds Ilm9 00 Candlelight, Linwood Design Ph#" 11702" i Aurora, Kaknu, Klan Municipal Aid 1,113,434 Evergreen, Mallon, Moiftley, 3rd, 4th, 27th DeNgn Phase 1,P low gad Ave t3 %Comp• am 4+4eti ParksiRea, 1�A� Ryon$ Cr. Park Ft, Way Restoration Design phaa 76%Comp, OOA00 0 7466 Youll"cWtor SW'OOO 6ymnsslum 26% CFimp, 661W0 Fha» Z ,gyp sost P 300,O0p Milo, ImWovemw►ts Design Phase 300A00 3., 1 i F r _�.a9_ __•- -•mow ��__�_ __.._�R� I F I V tj I R E P A S P T R O P E r, R C OIT 1 5 E C T P 1 = O R� 1 T� Y' f , ` S t CITT OF KENAI z= 198344 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS .` REQUEST FOR STATE GRANT FUNDINO _ I Iwo a•OravN P•Pn�Uq ItrtOroventenb 011W lir�rorements prelod 0oft x low °IlQ;Vow x 1 Pro" ' Numbn 1- First and Second Street$ • P �22 2, ANak, McCollum, Cinderella, Fox, Princess, Linwood 869 11001 31 Thompson Park • 0 921 2,012 Standard, Richfield, Thompson Piave • 0 284 2,298 Spruce, Second, and Third • P 738 3,034 f VIP •Lora, Watergate, Ketch 43 491 3,525 Lake, Marine, Granite Point, & F,6,0.•P 469 31994 A Library Addition Sw 4,694 0 S. Nighbush, Davidson, Bumblebee-0 1S9 4,763 L Aliak, Swires, Nighbush • 43 654 6,417 Main Street Loop (Courthouse) • P 389 6AN Irp e cl g 2 Ball rk t e 14? 14, Old Town • P 389 8,817 1� textend N. Taxi a port Airport Wall A 1,600 6,317 I 1 r r F3 F . o �.liC114-�= . ....-,._�xi_��.t.Aij f Cl..a.._ �.. J 1 J'd i � /1A .9 4... — �•_•_ .vso' � 1 7Y IProd Ntt�tnps► �leill� . , .. P�atks i �i�` • : , OfINr _ _ profit Cost Accum. T®t.l O��sNno IlnprowMl"go ts .. It11�rgNtlt9lib x 1m x 1000 This pamphlet was produced under the direction and approval of the Mayor and Council of the City of Kenal. Public Hearings were held November 10 and December 15, including numerous public work "sewn, concerning its preparation. The Mayor and the Council of the City of Kenai pledge their affirmative vote for maintenance and rations! coats of the rojecis slated T V •R E P R� 0 I E C T� S P R O R 1 _T i Y 1 � 0 Kenai (;bandMer "t (:ummeree Dox 497 Kenai. Alatoka (P)61I ��''!! (1)U7) 2113.7989 KVC RESOLUTION NO. 83-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE GREATER KENAI CNAMBER OF COMMERCE URGING THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE; POSITIV1 ACTION RELATIVE TO A SPECIFIC CAPITAL PROJECT, "COMMUNITY/CIVIC CENTEM", T11AT WOULD FURTHER ENHANCE OUR COMMUNITY. WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council has prepared a lint of Capital Projects for consideration, and WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council must select specific projocto for sub- mission for requou to for grant funds from the State of Alaska, and WHEREAS, the existing fiat documents many projects that would be of great benefit to the community, and WHEREAS, Blue to limited fundo available from the State of Alaska, it is of utmost importance to prioritize the list, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Chamber of Commerce's3 main function is to support and promote the orderly development and on -going growth of the community, and WHEREAS# a Civic Center or similar facility has been under consideration by the City of Kenai for over ten years, and WHEREAS, the citizeno of Kenai have taken the isrsue of a Civic Center to the polls on two separate occasions, the last of which was in 1080, and voted in support of City responsibility of maintenance, operation and other costs incurred over and above income derived from the uoo of such facility, and WHEREAS, roquests are received daily at the Chamber office for information relative to availability of meeting opace for such activities ao club 910etings3, small theatre groups, concurts;, dances and others, and WHEREAS, Kenai has no ,such facility available to serve groups, ranging in size from 10-25 to 300-500, and WHERi:AS, the citizen.-, have exprenoed their desire through the election pro - coca for ouch a facility. ( I q Y _ RESOLUTION NO. 8 3-1.1 Page Two NOW, THE'REFORC, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GREATER KENAI CHAMBER OF COMME.14CE that the Chamber hereby urges the Kenai City Council to proceed with efforts for obtaining funding from all pertinent sources and further that the Kenai City Council consider the "Community/Civic Center" an the of number one priority on the City's Capital Projects List, and E3E IT FURTEIEEi RESOf.11"M that the G t K� i Ch E f raer , .na am�er o CUmmercO encourages the construction and dgvolopment of other projects 40 listed on the Capital Projects list as funding becomes available. PASSED BY THE GREATER KENAI CHAMBER OF COM14ERCE this 31st PAY OF OCTOPER, 1983. I &U ENE CS LINS, Prooldent "— a r 1 ATTESTS 5ud� arterl Manager 1 OF _ ciitfNl' E'R KENAI c'11AMJtER OF COMMf:lIC ; � Itf"W1,1%'1110N 140, 811-12 A Rl"'J IXTION AP '1IM t;tt1;A'11.14 91;11AI CHAMBER OF COMMNRC110 AN ACTIVE,, " IiUPPO!t'111:R OF THE CITY 01 Kl•:NAI ,f 1.•.Fiot4l1N TO DEVELOP 'fill: NIt1SS1Nl,li5 AND 11.113113THIA1, COMMONITY. Va1►;ttl;A19, t h►a Xf,Mli Mursic Mal. Airport Lis ;a vital }cart of, Lilco tlev(llop- ment Of t;110 City .91)11 th(, tit, c-a'ss bun inemn inter (if;to, and VOIRRlsA' , the cuntit"J" i plcinn III (IPVQl(:,I)ment Of tho Airport and the aurroun►9iny ,area uhuuld Io? an on►.loinq concern of tho City of U-111A i . WAI, TIllati;N'ORM, UN' IT 1'Is;c)1:!l;ti t!Y 'N'11N: GREAT1:4 91:4AI C11A141INR ©N C014141:1!CN: thtst the following activition, ht) ptsrssuetl by th(i K�,flai City 00unr,11 tint) city A(ltnini;stration to further (tnhanco." and clav( lop the K(rfla(i 141snicipa). Airport, Vir .ts That ttia K(,nai Cliambsir of Ccmmerctj hereby tsrijais tho City Council Zino] tho laity Aslminiotration to continua the efforto nts propt;.,mi and thnss(J under -way for airport esapanri©n and csapital impr()v- 'n"to wisich c0nt,rit>utrr olreatly to a facility cot►tsitic-rout One of the f,ine'st In th(s Otut(J, Secounds That; th(f City of, K(Jn,al s:hc,uld iMMOdiatoly and activ(jly n(1(l0stiut1J tO Jicyuirt: thfs tit] arry Parcf)l acjawmt to and dividing airport proporty in the) nortliwoot sscrctiFan ®f too alrpcart. Thict V10u)(I p(frmit tutssrr' (;(intresl.lable ant) conol(Mant developolelst Of the airlemt, 'i'hirils That tilt- t;it/ of Kimai bogin immediately to plat at it;os:t f.()yr lsarc*10 in tim owtimes;t corrstar of tho airport mear tho ursur0'f(1 tlaut Plano h.assin .ind that thorp he masks• available to Z, "lat ion t l't ►a's,ih ,Jl.ltropr iat o 1tjar,09 proccduress ouch I)tir!;(rls: lt,r fur.thar tip-volopment of uirpert lando., Fell) rtto That the, (,It./ (,f runai (;(vntinue tho (lw"Ith and dovol- 01JAnnt ()f' tbo airpt,rt, the, t utwo platy., for a float plane. basin, pr iv,sf ,, .a i rrr,ai t t, if- boil ,,n►i b"Im ,r spit( to be ovaluaitod ant) adaptall itst.►J tail(, !.1-'nsliWl ,,r, tlfrssl r,.Wf" pr(ajectn, to inrure a con-- ssls;+t tft .t!I t-!>:o1Uts ►'fit 1row*Is of ttfr- airport facility, I'if►.i►s 'lli at. t,t,(, City A(lnsinldttat icjn '.Jith int(,rentod tta ,sllow the? -Itinrl of is tomporisry saki-ttrip and nkl ti•:(t(.iJri t,fi t,f(� wi ;St :si(1(a of thf, runway. That Yids; work b(t done with - I � 1 i I UE'SOIJITInN NO, 83-12 - Pailit Two out cyst to tbo city and with nc) ©i)ligation to maintain the strip or permit continued uue of the otrip in the future as rithor developmunt of that land taken place, I j VAfSORD BY TUP GUATHR KENAI CUAb1 ER OF CAMMERCRt thin 28th day of 9atoboc, 1903, i ° I i:u%�ena c,c� nu, PrQUIdont ATTROT s , uitor, accut vU v rgctAr ,o r ,r ^ r. i i I i II � i I I I i i i i 1 i f; Su114,Iee1,ed hys City Council 0 CITY OF KENAI RES� RESOLUTION 0 UIONN03-14 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING STATE OF ALASKA FUNDING THROUGH THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET ON BADLY NEEDED PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES THAT ARE OF AN AREA WIDE NATURE USED EXTENSIVELY BY PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ALASKA, BUT ARE MAINTAINED, OPERATED, AND SUPPORTED SOLELY BY THE. CITY OF KENAI. WHEREAS, thoro are many facilities innido the City of Kenai that ova uoed extensively by people throughout the Kenai Peninsula, Anchorage, and the State of Alaska, and WHEREAS, these same facilities have unrontrictod uoo and without additional charge to individuals who live outside the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, theno name facilities are maintained, operated, and supported solely by the City of Kenai even though they are benefiting the State of Alooka and individuals throughout the State# and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alooko funding support for the followings 1.) Library Addition - $7001000. The Kenai Community Library s a P55110 service roallity serving an area of approximately 25,000 people. Thio facility hoo B4OOO eardholdero with a yearly circulation of 709,000 items, Ono half of the cardholders era from outeido of the City. The facility is extremely overcrowded and in need of expension, 2.) Extend North Taxiway at Kenai AirpArt - 11,700000. At file mo the North 245ou rootor runway U1 does not have a taxiway exit, cnuaing aircraft to "backtrack" when lending on 01 or when taking off from runway 19, This maneuver eauees undue delay for landing/doperting aircraft, and could conceivably delay the landing of an aircraft experiencing omergency conditions. Thio project would extending the existing parallel taxiway northward from taxiway "C" and create taxiway "D". Thlo project is in conjunction with the Airport Hooter Plan, Phase It (1980-85). 30 Harbor -Bulkhead Drudging, Dock - $1 900 000, Thia facility w eory ce approx rna of y quU commercial nhing vegoole providing flsh to 14 area proceoning plants. In addition 1 .. s y i ,.r Y r n many plennuro craft and sumo fret(Iht haulerti from the lower 40 will have a at.agtng area In tho Konni nron Lhat will occommoduto their ohlpo for Lho first time. 4.) Extond Air ort Aprun - $2,750,000. The airport facility find a 011#0110 passongor uoo latil. year with an expected 210#000 thin year. Thin to a 60 percent inr.ronoe over the loot: two yearn. There woo A to 10 million puunda of fish flown into the airport loot year from mnny arena of the State. Thin oxpanoion in needed to prevont over-contleution and/or a catastrophic accident. Thin project to in conjunction with the Airport Master Plan, Phase II (19S0-05). 5.) Civic Center - $Z 125 000. Kenai'o population is growing at o rate or about a per year. lourium in the area is incr000ing by 12% per your. Kenai reprnaonts the all center And the fiohinq center on the Kenai Peninoula and needs a convention type center to keep pace with its growth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alooka funding through the Govornor'o budget on the badly needed projects off 1.) Library Addition - $700,000 2.) Extend North Taxiway at Kenai Airport - $1,700,000 3.) Horbor-Bulkheed,.Dredging, Dock - $1,900,000 4.) Extend Airport Apron - $2,750,000 5.) Civic Center - $2,125,000 AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of the Resolution be sent to Governor Bill Sheffield, Comminnionor Daniel Coney, DOTS Commissioner Robert London Smith, DepartmenL of Health, Education and Social Services; Commissioner Richard Lyons, Department of Commerce and Economic Development and to all meerhers of the 1963-84 Legislaturo. PASSEL) BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA thin 31et day of October, 1983. Tom Wagonert Mayor ATTEST: 91 Navy Ann Vote, Deputy City erk 2 d P � 4 CI 1 i VF r% NAI aj 44"4d„ F. O. SOX NO NINA A&ASKA 99111 ISLI/NONI 1/1 • 1/31 October 31 , 1983 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council 5�r1. FROMs Wm. J. Brighton, City Monago d) REs Area -wide Priority list The administration is still convinced that the airport ramp expansion is of vital importance to the continued growth and economy of the City of Kenai. It appeared that Mr. Arsenault's argument woo that there is a safety problem connected with extending the taxiway and that the larger planes created a wind problem that necessitated smaller planes having to wait three minutes before taking off down the runway. I will have to admit that Mr. Arsenault's arguments wore colorful and entertaining, but contribute nothing to Konai's growing economy. He also suggested reducing the number of planed allowed to haul fish for the local canneries. The Kenai airport is the catalyst of Kenai's economy. It is that agent in our community that stimulates more economic growth than any other single element. To restrict freight hauling of fioh is; to restrict the economic growth of the community and it should be the City's desire and intent to stimulate as much economic growth as possible. It is for the reasons stated that the administration would urge that the Council reconsider their prioritization of the area -wide capital improvements and place the ramp expansion so number 2 in importance to the City of Kenai. Our airport serves all of the commercial and freight interests of the only industry we have, i.e., fish processing, the oil industry and perhaps the prison facility at Wildwood. It is in the City's best interest to stimulate as much traffic at the airport as is practical. WJB/dg I f� , t I r CITY OF KENAI I, 0, SOX U$ XIMAI, AMIKA 99611 1" Moms M , 1636 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING There will be a special meoting of the Kenai City Council on -- Monday, October 31, 1983 at 6100 PM in the Council Chambers. Public Hearings Revolution 83-143 - Prioritizing Regional Projocto Within tho I City of Kenai The public ib invited to participate. 7i��Zzl� , Janet Whelan City Clerk DATEDs Oct. 289 1903 Pit j M s' f i _ J 1 f' r; COUNCIL MBET Llo ' V jL L a I COUNCIL MUTING OF I` ti / � .d + fii �' i.J tl � 1'" �'% --:`.�n•s f,1{ip Y�.,;y/r♦yf' .ARP-. /d i O Y i � I � I r i / l� 4 Sugycntad bys City Counell CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 03-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING STATE OF ALASKA FUNDING THROUGH THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET ON BADLY NEEDED PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES THAT ARE OF AN AREA WIDE NATURE USED EXTENSIVELY BY PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ALASKA, BUT ARE MAINTAINED, OPERATED, AND SUPPORTED SOLELY BY THE CITY OF KENAI. WHEREAS, there are many facilities inside the City of Kenai that are used oxtoneively by people throughout the Kenai Peninsula, Anchorage, and the State of Alaska, and WHEREAS, these same facilities have unrestricted uoa and without additional charge to individualo who live outside the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, these come facilities are maintained, operstod, and supported oolely by the City of Kenai even though they are Benefiting the State of Alaska and individuals throughout the State, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding support for the followings le) Library Addition - $700000. The Kenai Community Library o a public service facility carving an area of approximately 25,000 people. This facility hen 8,000 cardholders with a yearly circulation of 70,000 items. One half of the cardholdors are from outside of the City. The facility ie oxtremoly overcrowded and in need of expansion, ,.) Extend North Taxiwayat Kenai Air ort - $1 700 000. At e pruaunE f1mat the North 245U reot or runway 01 does not have a taxiway exit, causing Aircraft to "backtrack" when landing on 01 or when taking off from runway 19, This maneuver causes undue delay for landing/departing aircraft, and could conceivably delay the landing of an aircraft experiencing emergency conditions. ;his project would ,. axtend�the existing parallel taxiway northward from taxiway " " and create taxiway "D". This project is in conjunction with the Airport Master Plan, Phase 11 (1980-85). 3.) Harbor -Bulkhead Dredging,Dock - $I 90A 000. This facility w sery cs approx ma e y 5110 commercial shing vessels providing fish to 14 arcs processing plants. In addition 1 1 i ;1 1 JI t 1 . msny plenoure craft and some freighL houlors from the lower 48 will have a alaging area in Lho Konni area that will accommodate their ships for tho first time. /``. Extend Air ort Apron - $2 750 000. The airport facility e o a , poossnger uus oo; yner with an expected 2109000 this year. Thin is a 60 percent increase over tho last two years. There woo 8 to 10 million pounds of fiull flown into the airport loot year from many arena of the State. This expansion is needed to prevent over -congestion and/or a catastrophic accident. This project is in conjunction with the Airport Master Plan, Phase II (1980-85). L Civic Center - $2 125 000. Kenai's population is growing at a rate or about per year. Tourism in the area is increasing by 12% per year. Kenai represents the oil center and the fishing center on the Kenai Peninsula and needs a o*s��lr,ve center to keep pace with ita growth. NOW, THEREFORE, B6 IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding through the Governor's budget on the badly needed projects of: 10 Library Addition - $700,000 Lj y'1� Extend North Taxiway at Kenai Airport - $1,700,000 3.) Harbor -Bulkhead, Dredging, Dock - $1,900,000 �!�✓.f� Extend Airport Apron - $2,75_ 0, 00 �.) Civic Center - $2.125,000 AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of the Resolution be Wfft"t°o�-Governor Bill Sheffield, Commissioner Daniel Casey, DOT; rWC19;V3 ommiasione�r' sidoA--6sri-t#�; Department of �i,�i* Educ tion Commissioner Richard Lyons, Department of 1 oerce and Economic Development and to all members of the -84 Legislature. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this Met day of October, 1983. nl ` - Tom agoner, Mayor ATTESTS Mary Ann Dore, Deputy City Clerk 2 i I .. y -F, I r Suq(losted hyI City CnulleII Cl TV (IF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING STATE OF ALASKA FUNDING THROUGH THE GOVERNOR'S 11UDGET ON BADLY NEEDED PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES THAT ARE OF AN AREA WIDE NATURE USED EXTENSIVELY BY PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ALASKA, BUT ARE MAINTAINED, OPERATED, AND SUPPORIED SOLELY BY THE CITY OF KENAI. WHEREAS, thoro are many facilities insido tho City of Konai that are used extensively by people throughout tho Kenai Poninauin, Anehorago, anu the State of Alaska, and WHEREAS, these same facilities have unrentricted uno and without additional charge to individunln who live outsido the City of Konai, and WHEREAS, theno some facilities aro maintained, operated, and supported solely by the City of Kenai even though they are benefiting the State of Alaska and individuals throughout the State, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding support for the followings 1.0, Library Addition - $700 000. ,Thu Kenai Community Library s a Public service facility serving an area of approximately 25,000 people. Thin facility has E1,OOO cardholders with a yearly circulation of 70,000 itomo. Ono half of the cardholders are from outside of the City. The facility is extremely overcrowded and in need of expansion. 2.) Extend Air ort Aron - $2 750 000. The airport facility MaTle—Mu,V00 pessengor use loot year with an expected 210#000 this year. Thin io a 60 percent increase over the last two years. There woo 8 to 10 million pounds of fish flown into the airport loot year from many arena of the State. This expansion is needed to prevent ovor-congootion and/or a catastrophic accident. This project is in conjunction with the Airport taster Plan, Phase 11 (1980-85). 3.) Harbor -Bulkhead Dred in Dock - $1 900 000. This facility will service approximately Commercial shinq v0000ls providing fish to 14 area processing plants. In addition many pleasure craft and some freight haulers from the lower 48 will have a staging area in the Kenai area that will accommodate their ships for the first time. 1 I X4 Resolution No. 83-144 4.) Civic Canter 2 125,000. Konnl's population in growing at a ra a of aDou por year, louriam in the area in incroaaing by 12% por year. Konni repreoonto the oil center and the fishing contor on the Kenai i'oninoulo and noodo a community center to keep pace with Ito growth. 50 Extend North TaxiwnX at Kenai Air ort - 700 OOO. At the prosonE Elmo, the North 245Uroot o runway U1 d000 not have a taxiway exit, causing aircraft to "backtrack" when landing on 01 or when taking off from runway 19. Thin maneuver coupes undue delay for landing/doparting aircraft, and could conceivably dolay the landing of on aircraft experiencing emergency conditions. Thin project would extend the existing parallel taxiway northward from taxiway "C" and create taxiway "D". This project is in conjunction with the Airport Mootor Plan, Phase II (1980-85). NOW, THEREFORE,,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding through the Govornor'o budget on the badly needed projects of$ 10 Library Addition - $700,000 20 Extend Airport Apron-- $2,750,000 30 Harbor -Bulkhead, Drodaina, Dock - $1,900,000 4,) Civic Center - $2,125,000 5.) Extend North Taxiway at Kenai Airport - $1,700,000 AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of the Resolution be sent to Governor Bill Sheffield, Commissioner Daniel Coney, DOT; Commissioner Harold Reynolds, Department of Education; Commissioner Richard Lyon, Department of Commerce and Economic Development and to all members of the 1983-84 Legiolaturo. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 31ot day of October, 1983. Tom Wagonert maye ATTESTS I & _. ary nn Dore, epu y y Clerk i i y 1