Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-04-04 Council PacketCOUNCIL PACKETS lqeAq APRIL „ J Kenai City Council Meeting Packet April 4, 1984 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL APRIL 4, 19849 7s00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2. *Consent Agenda - All items listed with as asterisk (+►) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requeata, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Union Oil Representative - Drilling Wells 2. Kenai Peninsula Borough Representative - Incineration, Special Waste Site -1 -,a� A V . � � id ; 62 A'.) 'q'-t' -►�K3. Oscar Thomas - Sale of KUSCO C.P_UBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance 914-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Public Vehicle Commission 2. Ordinance 920-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Camai Circle Assessment District - $68,555 3. Ordinance 921-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns,fAA Facility- $1,500,000 4. Ordinance 922-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Community Center Design - $80,000 5. Resolution 84-29 - Accepting State Grant - Lawton, Walker, Tinker, Rogers Water & Sewer - $329451 6. Resolution 84-30 - Transfer of Funds - Shop Employee Training - $1,375 �7. Resolution 84-31 - Continuation of Camai Circle Assessment District D. MINUTES �0r 1. *Regular Meeting, March 7, 1904 2. *Regular Meeting, March 21, 1994 ��nerii�syprMir — - ,. 11 E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Alaska Dept. of Health d Social Services - Local Government Sijpport of Alcohol Treatment & Rehabilitation Services F. OLD BUSINESS 1. 80 Acres for Float Plane Basin - Appropriation & Acquisition tS `4 •M"'%'%u" G. NEW BUSINESS o:4" 1. *Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified ' tv-- `S. *Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. *Ordinance 923-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns - State Library Grant - $1,500 *Ordinance 924-84 - Establishing Assessment Fund - Regency Pointe - $31L0,000 *Ordinance 925-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - ��� Adding Title 14 - Kenai Zoning Code 6. Lease Application - Howard, Garner & Smith, Inc. Retail Mall & Office Condo - CIIAP 7. Assignment of Lease - Beluga Development to E.N.C. Corp., dbe Alaska Steel - CIIAP Be Borgen Losses - Rescission & Arrearage 9rs�" 9. Discussion - Section 36 - Sale Brochure 110. Discussion - Sale of KUSCO P . REPORTS A- _ � �ofro' 4+s - ate.-k1. H�g4Mee+:w9 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT l r— i r, ' a COUNC I I, Mlsl:l' I Nt; OF b �f f c t� I ji i i COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 4, 19114 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1 - Municipal League Nowaletter - Marsh, 1964 2 - Land Manager Labohn Memo - Competitive Soniod Bid Solo, Tie Bid - March 20, 1984 3 - Dick Mueller Letter - Purchaoe, Float Plane Basin Land - March 29, 1984 4 - None 5 - TAMS Bill - Engineering Sorvicoa - March 229 1984 6 - 5 Federal Agencies - Kenai River Plan - (received March 24, 1984) 7 - Cove Sheffield letter to Jackie Ruaaell - Capital Improvements Budget - Feb. 22, 1964 B - Kenai Peninsula Borough Minutes - March 6, 1984 9 - Clerk Whelan Memo - Clork'e Seminar Report, March 30? 1904 10 - Airport Committee Report - Float Plane Baoin - March 30, 1984 11 - None 12 - Kenai Peninsula Borough Agenda - April 3, 1984 13 - Beautification Committee Minutoo - March 19, 1984 14 - Correspondence to Bob Bielefeld regarding FBO S/D Lease Application 15 - Mop for Royal Pacific/Selamotof Dock Propooal 16 - Tronofor of Funds under $IpOOO . 17 - Leaao with FAA for Flight Service Station a a r Roben T. Anderson L1611191 Land Montt#► Deer Unit Owner: ' ti ur1 r rind-G"u� v�iun:Wualuin��u� Union Oil Company of California P,O, Box 6247, Anchorapo, Alaska 09502 Tolephone: (907) 276.7600 union April 1, 1984 ALL WORKING INTEREST OWNERS AND ROYALTY INTEREST OWNERS OF THE CANNERY LOOP UNIT CANNERY LOOP UNIT State of Alaska Unit -Contraction, Amendmen -and Future Obligations Several items of importance need to be addressed by all Unit Interest Owners of the Cannery Loop Unit. For this reason, we urge each and every one of you to take a few minutes and act where appropriate on the enclosed items to this mailing. As a part of this packet you will find the following: 1. Letter from Union to Unit Owners 2. Proposed Unit Contraction Letter 3. One copy of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement with revised Exhibits A and 8 4. Three State of Alaske,-Department of Natural Resource Letters S. One copy of Unit Agreement Amendment with corresponding ratifications. 6. Self-addressed, stamped envelope.for return mail. Please read on for explanation and instructions. Union Oil Company of California, Operator for the Cannery Loop Unit, has ac- tively pursued development of the Cannery Loop Unit under the Unit Agreement and directives from the State of Alaska and Federal Government. As most of. you sire aware, our drilling efforts in June of 1979 resulted in the discovery of a gas reservoir within the Cannery Loop Unit. This Unit was divided into two areas, one entitled Area A and the other Area 8, as depicted on the orig- inal Exhibit S, which you all received upon execution of the Oil and Gas Lease or Ratification of the Unit Agreement. The discovery well 1 mentioned satis- fied a drilling obligation we had in the Area A portion of the Unit. Area 8, however, had a similar drilling obligation which was satisfied in May of 1981. Unfortunately this drilling effort did not encounter hydrocarbons in commercial quantities. Having satisfied our two required well obligations r r. - - -r �• r..._.. -- _... _- - _._--- 105 Municipal Way, Suite 301 Juneau, Alaska 99801 d (907) 586.1325 0 00 tP ` �-- LEgistATIVE BWETIN ?y2ss2'?8�930 January 27, 1984 g+ r r cYr ��b1E17a�'0 FLOOR ACTION SCS CS HB 289(SA) am 8 - Poll Hourst The Committee substitute passed by the Senate changes poll hours for state elections only. The House concurred with the Senate changes. IN COMMITTEE HB 442 - Volunteer Fire Departmentss House CRA held a hearing but took no action on this bill, which makes all volunteer fire departments eligible for revenue sharing and raises the per capita amount from $10 to $20. HB 474 - Use of Grant Money Interests house CRA held a hearing and tabled this bill which would require all recipients of state grants to use interest money earned on the grant only for the purpose for which the pant was awarded or else return the interest to the state. Matti Confirmation Rearftes The Senate CRA Committee has held a confirmation hearing on CRA Commissioner Emil Matti and has recommended approval. SJR 29 • EPA Variance Reg star House Resources reported out CBSJR 29 (Res), which supports EPA variance requests by pulp mills in Southeast Alaska. Referred to Rules for placement on the calendar. SENATE. BILLS SB 361 - Imoaot Pa nMtes Introduced by Kerttula and Moses this bill would provide for payments of $200 an acre for the impact on the cost of providing municipal services by the sale of state owned land with that municipality's boundaries. Referred to CRA and Finance. 1+ A i i Working Interest Owners -3- April 1, 1984 Cannery Loop Unit With over 300 mailouts, an endeavor such as this can only be accomplished by a concertrd effort on your part. Please act promptly. .Should you have any questions regarding any of this material, please contact Kevin Tablet, at 263-7305, our Kenai Office, or at 276-7600, our Anchorage Office. Very truly yours, Ziert&rsonT. And cc: OMEM,'Key Brown, Director SLM, Supervisor, Joe Dyges .N 0 71 a i END OF ROLL NON CITY OF KENAI DATEs__,d7• //_ndG THE MICROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES APPEARING IN THIS ROLL OF MICROFILM ENDING WITHs G RECORD FILE NOs //0,—? ARE ACCURATE REPRODUCTIONS OF THE RECORDS OF THE CITY OF KENAI. DEPTs &i 4. FILMED SYs pew I certify that the original csmsra negative microfilm images contained or this roil back to the initial target, are direct and facsimile repro- ductions of the original documents. All documents have been filmed com- pists in their entirety. I certify to the above to the best of knowledge and belief. CERTIFIED SYt DATES J t Whelan, city Clerk 9 e Commissioner, OMEM -2- March 30, 1984 and District Manager, BLM Township 5 North, Range 11 Wesf, S.M. Sections 3 thru IN All Section 17: N-1/2, N-1/2SE-1/4, SE-1/4SE-1/4 � Section 18: N-1/21 SW-1/49 N-1/2SE-1/4, SW-1/4SE-1/4 Township 6 North. Rance it West. S.M. Sections 32 thru 34: All As a condition imposed under Article 2 of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement, we4 also submit revised copies of Exhibits A and B to the Cannery Loop Unit Agree- ment to supplement this Proposed Contraction for incorporation in this Appli- cation. Five copies and three Copies of the revised Exhibits are attached herewith for the Supervisor and director, respectively. This initiative is undertaken by the Unit Operator to comply with the Direc- tor's order for contraction of the Cannery Loop Unit as spelled out in her directive of December 21, 1983. We concur with the reasoning and logic em- ployed in that decision and offer her analysis as "reasons therefore under Article 2(a) of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement. Very truly yours, UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA Attorney- n- c cc: Working Interest Owners All Royalty Interest Owners i 1. JOINT FEDERAL -STATE AMENDMENT TO UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE CANNERY LOOP UNIT STATE OF ALASKA 'THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT THIS AMENDATORY AGREEMENT, effective as of the date approved by Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, State of Alaska Anchorage District Manager of the Department of the interior, Bureau of Management, by and among the undersigned, herein referred to as the "par hereto", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto are the owners of working royalty other oil and gas interests in the unit area subject to the Cannery Loop Agreement and this amendatory agreement; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resour $tote of Aiaske, is authorized by Alaska Statute 38,05.180 and Alaska Ad istrative Code Regulations 11 AAC 83.305 to consent to or approve this an meat or modification to the approved Cannery Loop Unit Agreement on behal the State of Alaska, insofar as it covers and includes lands and mineral f terests of the State of Alaska; and he purpose of the parties hereto to conserve not WHEREAS, it is t putp resources, prevent waste, and secure other benefits obtainable through de opment and operation of the ,area subject to the Cannery Loop Unit Agree and ,this amendatory agreement to the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement under terms, conditions and limitations set forth in such Unit Agreement as wel herein; Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the prOM herein contained, the parties hereto commit to this amendatory agreement respective interests in the unit area subject to and defined in the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement, and agree severally among themselves as follows: The first sentence of Paragraph li of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: "Upon completion of a• well capable of producing unitized substances in paying quantities, the Unit Operator shall within the month of such completion, if precticable, or Be soon thereafter as requirAd by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L., submit for approval by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L., a schedule based on subdivisions of the pudic long 5uivey or aliquot parts thereof of all land than regarded -as reasonably proved to be productive in paying Cuartfties; all lanes in said schecule on approval of the Supervisor and the Director, A.D.L., to constitute a participstIng area, effective upon approval of the SUPM1 scrr ©no the Director." WA- dP Otherwise sold Cannery Loop Unit Agreement shell remain as written. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, no one of which needs to be executed by all parties, or nosy be ratified or consented to by separate instrument in writing specificbily referring hereto and shell be binding upon all those parties who have executed such a counterpart, rat- ification, of consent hereto with the some force and effect as if all such parties had sinned the some document and regardless of whether or not it is executed by all other parties owning or claiming an interest in the lands within the above described unit area. This amendment shall be binding upon the undersigned, their succes- sorA or assigns. EXECUTED AS OF THIS � day of �� , 1984. zw UNIT OPERATOR Address: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA P. 0. box 6247' Anchorage, AK 99502 •By RoWrt T. Anderson / Attorney -in -Fact Address: CIRI PRODUCTION COMPANY P. 0. Drawer 4-N Anchorage, AK 99509 By President Address: MARATHON OIL COMPANY • P. 0. Box 102380 Anchorage, AK 99510 By Attorney- n-Fac Address: PACIFIC LIGHTING GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 720 west Eighth Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 By Vice -President Address: P. 0. Box 131 Feirbanks, AK 99707 Address: P. 0. Box 1747 Bellevue, WA 89009 ' ON ;-1 7 R. I. - Individual in consideration of the execution of Amendment to the Unit Agreement for the Developement end Operation of the Cannery loop Unit Area, State of Alaska, dated April 1, 1984, in form approved by the appropriate Governmental Agencies, the undersigned hereby expressly ratifies, approves and adopts the Unit Agreement and the Amendment to Unit Agreement in all its terms and provisions as fully as though the undersigned had executed the original Instrument. This Ratification end Joinder shell be effective as to the undersigned's Interests in any lands and leases, or interest therein, and royalties presently held or which may arise under existing option agreements or other interests in unitized substances, covering any lands within the unit area which the undersigned may be found to have an oil or gas interest. This Ratification and Joinder shall be binding upon the undersigned, its heirs, devisees, assigns or successors in interest. EXECUTED, this day of , 19 SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS TRACT NO. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) SS. STATE OF ) This certifies that on the day of _ , 19 , before me, a notary public in and for the State of , duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known and known to me to be the persons descri ed In, and who executed the foregoing instrument, who then after being duly sworn according to law, acknowledged to me under oath that he executed some freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes tFe—rein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ' o ary Puublic for My Commission expires: O � b b b b j D DEPARTMENT OF ll'ATDRAL RESOURCES f - DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS March 1, 1984 Al ` / BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR POuGN 7431 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99610 Onion Oil Company of California P.O. Soz 6247 ►� T C1 Anchorage, AS 99302 oz► • ;'� S �.ry� Attas Mr. Robert T. Anderson 2f9 d� Subject: Cannery Loop Unit Work Commitment Pursuant to Delay in Initial Participating Ares Dear Mr. Andersons In December, 1983, Union Oil Company of California requested the State of Alaska to approve a delay in the formation of the Initial Participating Area for the Cannery Loop Unit until the hydrocarbon reservoir underlying the Unit Area was more completely delineated. This request was granted by the State in a letter dated December 22, 1983. Pursuant to that December 21, 1983 decision, this letter vill outline the work commitment the State feels proper and necessary to delineate and develop the hydrocarbon reservoir in the unit area. On February 17, 1984, members of my staff (Sill Vat Dyke, Catherine S. Fortney, and Ca►s Ariey) met with representatives of the Cannery Loop Working Interest and Royalty Owners to discuss the work commitment necessary for this unit.' At that meeting, Union Oil Company of California submitted a "Proposed Work Program" that they felt would adequately delineate the hydrocarbon reservoir. After discussions about the proposed work commitment program with the members of my staff, I''agree'that all of the studies proposed would contribute to eventual production of gas from the Unit. In order to protect the state's interest it promoting timely development of the Unit, I have decided to require the following scbedule for the tecessary work commitment: 1984 - lyBSs A. Market Analysis: 1. Determination of Needs for Natural Gas in Southcentral Alaska. Additional Manufacturing and Export Needs, 2. Timing of Needs for Natural Gas. B. Development/Production Facilities Analysis. C. Petrographic Studies. D. Fluid Susceptibility Studies. E. Detailed Computer Analysis of Open Bole Logs. ,i z.f r_. •: r Onion Oil Company of California Cannery Loop unit Work Commitment March 1, 1984 - Page 2 Cr The type and extent of studies listed is Parts "8" through "E"'above are at the option of the Cannery L'6op unit Working interest Owners. 1M A. Tea Was Seismic Acquisition to Delineate East-West Trending f). Fsuit Co South End of Structure. ! 8. Zri11 Cannery Loop Unit Well 04. In 1986, Part•!'a" is optional, but Part 1#8" is required. The iesults of studies performed is 1984 - 1985 must be presented to the Division of Oil and Gas by February 1, 1986. The State is aware of at least one poteritiai marketer that has approached the Cannery Loop unit Operator with an interest in purchasing Cannery Loop Unit gas production. As s royalty owner, the State has an interest is the expeditious development of and production from the Cannery Loop Wt. • Therefore,, the State requests that union Oil inform the State of any inquiries they have received in the past two years regarding purchase of Cannery Loop C unit gas. In addition, the State also requests that if Union Oil or other Working Interest Owners are contacted by s potential marketer seeking to Purchase Cannery Loop unit gas, the State be notified of sueb contact at that time. If ou have as Catherine 0276-26530 the work commitment, please contact Sincerely, broft �' Mreetos �.- - - . :----. 1137g:K8:RF:ms F y . t a r [n I__ - 11 - - --- - I MEMORANDUM Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas To: File FROM: Kate Fortney, Unit Mgr - flreul�ll�s�ee State of Alaska DATE: February 14, 1984 FILE N0: Cannery Loop PA TELEPHONE N0: .27 6-2653 ' SUBJECT: Amendment to Cannery Loop Unit Agreement The question has arisen whether or not Union as the Unit Operator of the Cannery Loop Unit will have to amend their Unit Agreement to prevent a premature automatic contraction under the current terms of their unit agreement. After examination of the terms of the unit agreement, it does appear Id►at Union will have to amend their unit agreement, to avoid having a PA retroactive to June 29, 1979, the dote of completion of the first well in the unit area capable of producing try drocarbons In paying quantities. Article 11 of the Unit Agreement reads as follows: 11. PARTICIPATION AFTER DISCOVERY. Upon completion of a well capable of producing unitized substances in paying quantities, the Unit Operator sha11 within the month of such completion, if practicable, or as soon thereafter as required by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L. , submit for approval by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L., a schedule based on subdivisions of the public land survey or aliquot parts thereof of all land then regarded as reasonably proved to be productive in paying quantities; all lands in said schedule on approval of the Supervisor and the Director, A.D.L., to constitute a particl pati no area, effective as of the date of completion of such well or the effective date of the unit agreement, whichever is later.,.... The automatic contraction' provision of this Agreement could be abrogated by changing the above to read as follows: 11. PARTICIPATION AFTER DISCOVERY. Upon completion of a well ,capable of producing unitized substances in paying quantities, the Unit Operator shall within the month of such completion, if practicable, or as soon thereafter as required by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L., submit for approval by the Supervisor and Director, A.D.L., a schedule based on subdivisions of the public land survey or aliquot parts thereof of all land then regarded as reasonably proved to be productive in paying quantities; all lands in said schedule on approval of the Supervisor and the Director, A.D.L., to constitute a participating area, effective u on approval of the Su ervisor and the Director AS OF THE DATE OF COWLEVER IM r LATER]. ... i Mamo - Cannery Loop PA K. Fortney - 2/14/84 Page 2 The effect of this' change would be as follows: 1. Subject to our determination of 12/22/83, a participating area for this unit will not be required until 90 days prior to sustained unit production. 2. Subject to the proposed change in Article 119 this participating area, required prior to production, will be effective on the date specified in the document approving• the participating area. Allocation of production wi1.1• then be based on that participating area formula, as set out in Article 12 of the Unit Agreement. 3. Under•Article 2(e) of the Unit Agreement, the first automatic contraction of the Unit Area would occur on or before the fifth Anniversary of the effective date of the first initial participating area. The contraction could, therefore, theoretically be postponed until four years and nine months after the commencement of sustained unit production. (This would not necessarily prohibit the State from initiating contraction procedures under Article 2(a) of the Unit Agreement as we have already done on December 22, 1983.) It does appear, then, that the amendment of Article 11 as proposed above would solve the current problems facing the Cannery loop Unit. The U. S. Dept. of the Interi or (BLM) has not yet decided whether or not they have an interest In this unit, and It does not appear that they are going to make this determination in the near future. In the interest of keeping the State out of a potentially messy and time-consuming affair, I suggest that we follow the some procedure that we did in determining that a PA would not be required until 90 days prior to sustained unit production,, i.e. go ahead and make the required decision as if the State were the only party involved, adding a caveat that if the BLM decides later that they have a legal interest in the unit, the decision will be subject to their concurrent approval. That solves the problem for the meanwhile, and leaves BLM to figure out what they want to do at their leisure. As a condition of the extension of the required PA as granted In ,the same December 22 letter, DMEM said that we would impose a work commitment on the area that would be effective for not less than five years. This work commitment is due to Union by March 1, 1904. On December 22, 1983, DWM sent a directive to Union Oil Company of California ordering them to prepare and distribute a notice of proposed contraction of the Cannery Loop Unit. To date, we have not received a copy of this required contraction. They have notified us that they are waiting to hear from the State as to the above mentioned work commitment and the proposed amendment of the unit agreement, so that they can present all three items to their working interest owners at the same time. As they have approximately three hundred working interest and royalty owners at this time, this Is probably a reasonable request; however, when we give them the work commitment, we should probably give them a time limit, say 60 days, to complete the proceedings for contraction of the unit. Otherwise it could stretch out indefinitely. . " iG?3A cv�t o 1 8L SK G 8 BILL sMEFFIEW, GOVERNOR O UEt"AKT119ENT 0F NATURAL f0KS0111tCEN "AfEAWANNENERGYM UGEMENY' Pouch 7-034 • A h nc orege, Alsaks 99510 it L'I..I?" ,N.& December 21, 1983 Union Oil Company of California P. 0. Box 6247 Anchorage,.AK 99602 Attn: Mr. Robert T. Anderson Subject: Cannery Loop Unit Initial Participating Area Dear Mr. Anderson: The Division of Minerals and Energy Management has reviewed the dats.presented to this office on December 21, 1983 regarding the formation of the initial Participating Area for the Cannery Loop Unit. The primary purpose of a Participating Area is to equitably allocate production and expense among the Working Interest Owners and Royalty Owners in the unit area. The current State of Alaska regulations call for the formation of an initial Participating Area at least 90 days prior to sustained unit production (11 AAC 83.351). As production from the Cannery Loop Unit is not anticipated in the near -future, and after analyzing the geological and geophysical data presented to the division; it is our belief that the formation of a Participating Area for the :snit at this time would not serve the interests of any of the parties committed to the unit, and a delay of the formation of the initial Participating Area until more information regarding the extent of the underlying hydrocarbon reservoir is available is in order. Article 11 of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement calls for a Participating Area to be established "within the month of completion [of a well capable of producing unitized substances in paying quantities], if practicable, or as soon thereafter as required by the Supervisor and the Director, A.D.L.". In the context -of the Unit Agreement, °Director, A.D.L." referred to the Director of the Division of Lands, Department of Natural Resources, and "Supervisor" referred to the Supervisor of the U.S. Geological Survey, (Cannery Loop Unit Agreement, Article 2). in the time since the Unit Agreement was executed, reorganizations in the two governmental agencies have resulted in the delegation of the duties of the Director, A.D.L. to the Director of the Division of Minerals and Energy Management, Department of Natural Resources, and the delegation of the duties of the Oil and Gas Supervisor to the Anchorage District Manager of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of land Management. s •. i f J Union Oil Company of California Cannery Loop Unit - Initial Participating Area December 21, 1983 Pagel 2 Although the formation of a -Participating Area at this time may be premature, It is necessary to exclude lands from the unit area that have been reasonably proven to be incapable of producing or contributing to production of hydrocarbons in paying quantities. Most of Block "B" of the Cannery Loop Unit Area can be demonstrated to fall into this category, and additional work is necessary on a large part of the remaining unit area to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the state that it does in fact meet the criteria of being productive or capable of contributing to production of hydrocarbons in paying quantities. Under Articles 2(a)-(d) of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement, therefore, 1 hereby direct you as the Cannery Loop Unit Operator to prepare and distribute a notice of proposed contraction of the unit area, contracting the unit area down to the following lands: TSN, R11W, S.M., Sections 3, 4, S, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, All; TSN, R11W, S.M., Section 179 N/2; N/2 SE/4, SEA SE/4; T5N, R11W, S.M., Section 18, N/2, SW/4, N/2 SE/4 SW/4 SE/4; and T6N9 RllW, S.M., Sections 32, 33, and 34, Ail. In addition to the above described contraction, a work commitment will be required on the remaining unit area. This work commitment will be in several steps commencing with the effective date of the contraction, and will last at least five years, and may include additional seismic and other technical studies to evaluate the hydrocarbon reservoirs, drilling commitments, and market studies. Should any step of the work commitment not be completed in a timely manner, the unit area will immediately contract down to the area determined at that time to be reasonably proven to be capable of producing or contributing to the production of hydrocarbons in paying quantities. This phased work commitment will be determined by the division, and will be submitted to the Unit Operator on or before March 1, 1984. Division staff would be willing to discuss'the contents of, the work commitment with the working interest owners prior to March 1, if you so desire. CONCLUSION. The Division of Minerals and Energy Management has determined thata 'i in the best interests of the State of Alaska to require that a Participating Area be required for this unit before production commences from • the unit area. Therefore, under Article 11 of the Cannery Loop Unit Agreement, i hereby require that a schedule for lands to be contained in the .. initial Participating Area be submitted to the Division of Minerals and Energy Management for approval at least 90 days prior to sustained unit production subject to the contraction of the unit area and establishment of a phased work commitment on the remaining unit area as noted above. e f r �.... - _ ' ��e...: Union Oil Company of California Cannery Loop Unit - Initial Participating Area I December 21, 1983 Page•3 Should it be determined that the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management has a legal interest in the structuring of the work commitment or the formation of the initial Participating Area for the Cannery Loop Unit, the work commitment or this delay in the requirement for the establishment of an initial Participating Area will be subject to the their concurrence. - Sincerely, By B own Dire or C KB/KF/ms/1666A { r I . t cc: Mr. Joseph Dyges, U.S. Dept. of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Mr. George Christie, CIRI . ;' .. i f i r . '.t•K.•.}itlwv1iM14 : ni:i:�L-. •, l.�.w;w i.:4'.:7W�.}�:,SY•.t;�S.�J•�il�.q.i:%J:�i.�',{II�:�/•i�1��.�i. rN4aj'iif'fj;.•; '•'�, �•�.N.O.i .. %,�l/�T�'.•.• ufl►{C.i1.fL�(iIi!.i!ilil.�'4w:K�A�b�ML•�bwiN- ,fo n s 01i1 Kenai Natives Amociation, Inc. P.O. Box 1210 FRd, Kenai, AK 99611 %4 �`• (907) 283.4951 C i � •���• .tip.-.. � I Mr. Bill Brighton, Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue Kenai, AK 09611 t owl "I G 3/20/84 Dear Bill: � Per George btiller's request, enclosed please find ttayor Stan Thompson's Starch 12, 1984 letter regarding. ' the "Special Waste Site Investi;,ption" for the Marathon Road area. I i Carol L. Freas Executive toy .. .. � - -�..—. _.-..�..,.. .....fir.. .. .. _..ry r' qo6kil. 80% A5O a SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 90660 PO4ON9 262.4441 STAN TNOMP—A MAYOR March.12, 1994 Mr. George Miller President Kenai Native Association P. 0. Box 1210 Kenai, Alaska 99611 REs Special Waste Site Investigation Dear Mr. Millers In accordance with your meeting of March 2, 1984 with our Borough Solid Waste Engineer, Skip Bambard, this letter is to formally request your permission for our geotechnical consultants to enter the following parcel of land for the purpose of conducting a subsurface investigation. As was discussed at the meeting, the purpose of this investigation would ba to detormine the potential for this parcel of land to serve as a "Special Waste Site". This parcel of land consists of approximately, 320 acres and is described as follows$ r o NEh, Sac 12, TGN, R11W1 S.H., AK. and j NW4, Sec 9, T6N, R104I, S. M., AX. In the event that the investigation proves that the site is usable as a "Special Warsto Site", we would then begin formal process of negotiating for the acquisition of the site. Naturally this process would involve the Assembly and general 1 public. I It is our intention to proceed with this investigation at the r` ( earliest possibility; therefore, your most expeditious handling of this matter would be most appreciated. Should you have any - - questions or if we can be of any further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. • Sincerely, tan Thompson► Mayor NDA/dd f z , , m M, DESIONE-146 CGNSu1, rANTS 04GINISMS I PLANOM I GW&V6VOftf Feasibility Investigation:' Septage/Solid Waste Codisposal F?r- The Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska February 1984 FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATIONS SEPTAGE/SOLID WASTE CODISPOSAL FOR THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, ALASKA .I� I / Prepared By Roy P. Weston, Inc. Burlington, Massachusetts ID In Association with Tryck, Nyman, and Hayes, Inc. Anchorage, Alaska r ' A f i� k; February 1984 R. 1 i r a � , -ter r� TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace SECTION 1 STUDY RESULTS 1-1 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Study Results 1-4 SECTION 2 REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AS THEY 2-1 AFFECT PROJECT FEASIBILITY 2.1 Planning Area 2-1 2.2 Population Growth 2-1 2.3 Population Density - 2-4 2.4 Climate 2.5 Inflation and Escalation 2-7 SECTION 3 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 3-1 3.1 Solid Waste 3-1 3.2 Septage 3-5 SECTION 4 CURRENT DISPOSAL PRACTICE 4-1 4.1 Municipal Solid Waste 4-1 4. 2 - Septage 4-2 SECTION 5 POTENTIAL ENERGY USERS 5-1 5.1 Public Buildings 5-1 5.2 Homer Electric Company 5-2 5.3 Nikishka Industries 5-4 5.4 Potential Energy Revenues 5-4 SECTION 6 POTENTIAL FACILITY SITES 6-1 SECTION 7 FACILITY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 7-1 7.1 Summary of Design 7-1 7.2 Facility Components 7-9 7.3 Facility Capacity and Septage Incinerator 7-13 7.4 Pipeline and Pipe Bridge 7-14 7.5 Facility Operations and Maintenance 7-15 iii . J F. i TABLE OF CONTENTS (conCluaea) SECTION 8 COST ESTIMATE 8.1 Capital Costs 6 2 Operating Cost f 8.3Bond Issues 8.4 Lif a Cycle Costs REBLRENCES APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS APPENDIX 8 COST ESTIMATES I J •i i i iv Page 6-1 8-1 8-2 8-4 8-6 R-1 A-1 8-1 �-1 M SECTION 1 STUDY RESULTS IA Introduction This report presents the findings and results of a two-phase study to determine the feasibility of a resource recovery facility in the Central Peninsula region of the Kenai Peninsula Borough (Borough). The resource recovery facility will dispose of municipal solid waste (NSW), pre-processed septage, and waste oil by combustion and produce energy from the combustion process. The feasibility study was performed in two phases to enable the Borough to revAsw the results of a preliminary f study before deciding to commit resources for the detailed study. The preliminary phase is documented in a report titled, "Preliminary Feasibility investigation: Septage/ Solid Waste Codisposal for the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska", July 1983. This report combines the relevant sections of the pre- liminary study and the additional work that was performed during the second phase, therefore representing a final, unified feasibility investigation. The facility conceptual designs and cost estimates reported herein replace entirely those presented in the July 1983 report. It is currently planned by the Borough that the entire facility, including both the septage processing and ineinera- Lion equipment, will be designed and constructed by a single contractor. This contractor will also guarantee the perfor- mance of the facility upon completion of construction and f prior to its being accepted for ownership by the Borough. This is known as a "turnkey" arrangement in which a single `.J contractor bids its particular system and guarantees that the system will perform as promised by passing an acceptance test. :y The facility will be owned and operated by the Borough and may be financed by general obligation bond financing. �_ per the purpose of this study, we assume a debt repayment -;`� schedule which is skewed so that there are lower payments in the early years and higher payments in the later years when �i escalating energy revenues can cover more of the debt. The financing also assumes a 60 percent construction grant for the incinerator facility and an 87.5 percent grant for the 1-1 . I L' * M r­ septage treatment portion of the facility, both grants coming from state and federal sources. Two deviations from the normal turnkey contractor ar- rangement are planneds the operating cost estimate for the first year is based on the assumption that the facility's operation will be carried out under contract by the turnkey contractor in order to train Borough employees as operators; n and a second acceptance test is to be performed at the end of the first operating year with the turnkey contractor being responsible for the facility passing that test. A potential issue may arise regarding the septage de - watering process line in that potential contractors may not r i want to provide a turnkey guarantee for this equipment. However, for the purpose of this report, it is assumed that this issue is resolvable and that the septage dewatering line will not be excluded from the turnkey contractor's guarantee. , This study screened sixteen separate combinations of site, energy product, and waste input. This resulted in the selection of two preferred system options: a two megawatt electricity generating facility located on Borough -owned property in the vicinity of the Kenai Community College and the Kalifonsky Beach Elementary School in Soldotnat and a - steam and electricity generating ("cogeneration") facility - located at one of the industries on the North Road in Nikishka. Both facilities have an NSW disposal capacity of 110 tons per day and a septage disposal capacity of 1.4 million gallons per year. A list of the facility concepts screened during this ' study is presented in Table 1-1. in addition to the facil- ities indicated above, preliminary cost analysis was per- formed, for reference, for the following two facility concepts$ • hot water and electricity cogeneration in the vicinity of Kalifonsky Beach Road and the Kenai Community College (Kalifonsky Beach) • hot water and electricity cogeneration adjacent to the high school in Soldotna (High School). Descriptions of the above sites and technologies employed are presented in later sections of this report. 1-2 - i w i . 1 r j Table 1-1 I Facility Concepts Screened 4 i Energy Products Septage Site Disposal Hot Water Electricity Steam 1. K. Beacha'b 2. K. Beacha ✓ - - - 3. K. Beach - ✓ - - 4. K. Beach ✓ ✓ - - S. K. Beach - ✓ ✓ - 6. K. Beach ✓ ✓ ✓ - 7. K. Beach - - ✓ - e . K. Beach ✓ - ✓ - 9. High Schoolc - ✓ - - 10. High School ✓ ✓ - - 11. High School - ✓ ✓ - 12. High School ✓ ✓ ✓ - 13. Nikishkad - - - ✓ 14. Nikishka ✓ - - ✓ 15. Nikishka - - ✓ ✓ 16. Nikishka ✓ - ✓ ✓ a. incineration without heat recovery b. Site in vicinity of Kalifonsky Beach Road c. Site adjacent to Soldotna High School d. industries on North Road near Nikishka As is shown in Table 1-10 facility concept alternatives ► such as incineration without heat recovery, hot water genera- tion only, steam generation only, and cogeneration were examined. In addition, the effect of excluding septage treatment was evaluated. 1.2 Study Results Septage and NSW codisposal by incineration and energy production is technically feasible, given the relative quantities and the estimated constituents of each projected for the Central Peninsula. Codisposal, in particular, offers significant environmental benefits over the current methods of waste disposal, particularly in the case of septage. Both se tage and NSW are land disposed at pre- sent. The landfills in Kenai and Soldotna appear to be well -run, with care taken to comply with requirements for daily covers prevent wind-blown litters enhance surface run- off of precipitations encourage scavengings and, monitor groundwater. On the other hand, the lack of native clays and the abundance of coarse gravel in the Central Peninsula has the potential to enhance infiltration of precipitation thereby leading to the generation of leachate which may cause groundwater contamination. Septage disposal in the Central Peninsula, however, appears to be performed in a relatively uncontrolled manner. This waste is discharged to the ground in pits. There do not appear to be any attempts to apply the waste to the ground in a controlled manner, within the assimilative capac- ity of the soil and its bacterial processes, or to monitor the effects of this discharge on the soil and groundwater. It is very likely that the present method of septage dispos- al will lead to groundwater contamination by organic acids, sulfides, other products of •anaerobic digestion, and chem- ical additives as well as render areas of land useless for near -term use, due to the presence of undigested solids. Prom a potential cost standpoint, the resource recovery alternative that is potentially most economically attractive is the Nikishka Industries cogeneration facility with the Kalifonsky Beach electricity generating facility being second. The Nikishka Industries facility is less expensive than the Kalifonsky Beach facility because of the higher energy revenues expected from the sale of both steam and electricity to the industries rather than just the sale of electricity to the utility company (Homer Electric) at 1-4 �� IL P `�"--tea ns.� "-yt,<:x-...._,,.�... ._...�,._. _ _ -. - •- ..�.. a ..1 ON Kalifonsky Beach. Additionally, a higher rate is credited for each kilowatt hour of electricity at Nikishka because there the competing rate is for retail electricity, rather than Homer Electric's wholesale electricity rate at the Kalifonsky Beach site. The above conclusions, however, are based on only partial informations the disposal cost estimates for the Nikishka facility are less certain than those for Kalifonsky Beach because negotiations have not been initiated with any of the industries. Specifically, the following factors are not known: • whether any of the industries are willing to re- ceive steam and electricity from the facilityl • what prices the industry will pay for steam and electricity) • whether any of the industries will sell or lease land to the Borough for the facility site (assuming that the Borough would be reluctant to exercise its powers of eminent domain)) and • whether the industries are willing to enter into long-term contracts (15 to 20 years) with the Borough for buying steam and electricity. On the other hand, Homer Electric is required by feder- al law to accept the electricity generated at the Kalifonsky Beach site for from any other potential site) and it is required to pay for that electricity on the basis of its avoided costs (in this case the purchase cost of electricity from Chugach Electric Company). Other advantages of an elec- tricity -only facility is that it can be sited in more loca- tions than a steam -producing facility: and its energy custom-* er to utility) is more likely to enter into a long-term contract than an industrial customer. We estimate that the center of. solid waste generation for the Central peninsula region of the Borough to be in the vicinity of the Kalifonsky Beach Elementary School. The cost difference between hauling solid waste to the central location and a facility at Nikishka is estimated at $82,000 in 1987 (the first year of facility operations). Using the facility's annual capacity of 32,600 tons, this incremental transportation cost would add $2.50 per ton to the Borough's 1-5 disposal cost. This analysis takes into account the present f location of the collection boxes, the frequency of pickup of , the boxes, the per mile cost of hauling, and the present dis- tribution of solid waste among all the boxes. The transpor- tation analysis for the Central Peninsula is presented in Appendix A. It was found that neither of the hot water producing f , options at Ralifonsky Beach or the High School showed favorable economics because the potential energy revenues from such hot water will not pay back the amortized cost of the water distribution pipeline. It was found that incineration without heat recovery does not produce favorable economics because the lower capital cost of the facility does not fully compensate for the loss of energy revenues. Table 1-2 presents the disposal cost per ton of NOW for every three years of operations for the two favorable alter- natives. Also in the table is a comparison of the projected facility disposal costs with projected costs of landfill disposal. Yearly cost projections for the 20 year life of these two alternatives and the two hot Water/cogeneration alternatives are presented in Section 9 of this report. The resource recovery/landfill camrisons in Table 1-2 are presented graphically in Figure I.I.1 As is shown by the table and figure, the Kalifonsky Beach alternative is projected to have a disposal cost high- er than the cost of landfill disposal for the first year of facility operations. It then falls -- and remains -- below the potential landfill cost thereafter. Shown also are pro- jected costs after 15 years of operations when the capital debt is paid off. After 15 years the disposal costs essen- tially drop back to the $60 per ton range. The Nikishka Industries alternative is projected to have a disposal cost lower than landfill for all years of Ft operations. These projections provide a picture of poten- f tial economic savings over lan filit however, as described earlier, the true cost picture is subject to negotiations With one of the industries. Two factors inhibit a lower cost projects the relative- ly low price for energy and the high cost of construction in the Central Peninsula relative to the Lower 49. The cost projections shown in Table 1-2 and presented in Section 8 ft 1-6 m7a Table 1-2 Comparison of Projectod Dispoeal Costs Per Ton NOW for selected Resource Recovery Facilitie with Projected Landfill Costs, (ail costs in current year dollars) Year Kalito k a Mikishka(c) Landfill 1 44.17 37.43 40.00 3 43.37 33.43 47.00 6 49.82 37.63 59.00 9 58.38 43.69 74.00 12 67.90 50.19 94.00 16 70.40 57.16 118.00 18 $9.60 32.47 148.00 20 66.53 33.72 173.00 (a) See section 8 for complete is year cost pro- jections. (b) Kslifonsky Beach with electric generation. (a) Nikishka Industries with cogeneration. Cost includes incremental transportation costs associated with site location relative to Kalifonsky Bosch site. 1-7 ,r . . ....... . . %7 V 1100 too 100 4 0o N 1000, 1-0 0001 J MSW Current Practice y 0-0/ Kallionsky Beach aloctrlo Generation j ' loop ; avow 000, } 'Nlklebke Industries Cogeneration (Including Incremental transportation cods) i 19e7 logo lose 9000 to0d Year Figure 1-1. Comparison of Projected Disposal Costs Per Ton MOW for Selected Resource Rocovery Facilities with ` Projected Landfill Costs � l N®THs Nikishka Industries projected disposal cost includes incremental cost of transporting MOW to site, relative to cost of transporting MOW to Kalifonsk Beach alto. Y r are based on the assumptions used herein for inflation and escalation of energy, landfill, and septage costs. We know that current energy costs are artificially low and that these will increase significantly in the next live years. We know also that the cost of landfill disposal will take an incremental jump in three years and that septage disposal will necessarily become more expensive with tightening anvi- ronmental regulations. What we do not knows of course, is what the actual increases will be, either in the near -term or over 15 years. Therefore, the cost projections in this report should be examined in light of the assumptions used for inflation and escalation. Inflation and escalation rates for energy prices are presented in Section 2.5, energy revenues are estimated in section 5.4, and cost increases for land disposal of NSW and septage are presented in sec- tions 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. in every case, we have attempted to be conservative, yet reasonable, realizing that overestimation of escalation may unduly place the facility in a favorable light, while underestimation of escalation may unduly cause a negative decision to be made, thereby losing an opportunity for the Borough to participate in the benefits of resource recovery. 'IQ J t I i SECTION 2 REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AS THEY AFFECT PROJECT FEASIBILITY 2.1 planning Area The planning area for the project includes NSW gener- ated in the northwestern portion of the Kenai Peninsula (otherwise known an the Central Peninsula region of the Borough) and septage generated generally from Ninilchik to the south, Nikishka on the north, Cook inlet on the west, and Cooper Landing to the east. A map of the planning area is provided in Figure 2-1. These boundaries are not rigid since the Borough has freedom to direct NSW either to the resource recovery facility or to existing landfills in Kenai, Soldotna, or Honer, and the septage service area is defined primarily by the costs to individual home owners of hauling and disposing of the waste at various locations. The planning area boundaries, however, are consistent with present practices, with the exception of NSW from Ninilchik which is disposed at the Honer balefiii. Septage from Ninilchik is currently hauled north to private disposal sites in the planning area. Because the contribution of NSW and septage from areas on the borders of the planning area is small, minor changes in its boundaries will not signifi- cantly affect the conclusions of this study. 2.2 o ulation Growth The Kenai Peninsula Borough is one of the most rapidly expanding areas in Alaska. The Borough population in 1980 was 25,282, By 1992, a special census performed by the Alaska Department of Labor found that the population had increased by 28 percent to 32#303. The population of the Central Peninsula portion of the Borough during the, same time matched the Borough's population increase by growing from 15,672 to 19,886 (27 percent). The projected population for the Central Peninsula is shown in Figure 2-2. This figure is derived from population projections for the entire Borough as published in "Situa- tions and Prospects", prepared by the Borough Resource Development Office, April 1982. In order to estimate the 2-1 s i P. . , - � N . N Approximate Scale: 1 Inch - 14 miles Figure 2-1. Map of Planning Area f 1' "0*riiY1`= 0-- — ---7 higha 0-------- 0 population projection.for this reportb 35, 000 AP-- O -d intermediatea 0— - —0 Iowa _ �p 10.1 .01 30,000 25,000 w " a 0 00000 20,000 15,000 1980 1905 1990 1995 Year a. Sources projection for Kenai Peninsula Borough as found in Borough publication, "Situation and Prospects" (April 1982)1 all population values for Borough multiplied by 0.62 (historic ratios) to reflect Central Peninsula population. - . b. Population value for 1982 taken from actual census. Figure 2-2. Central Peninsula Population Projections Growth Scenarions { .l� population growth of the Central Peninsula, the Borough pro- jections are multiplied by 0.62, which is the Central Penin- sula/Borough population ratio for 1980 and 1982. it is assumed that this ratio will be relatively constant as the Borough population increases. As can be seen from the figure, the actual population increase between 1900 and 1982 follows the Borough's "high" growth scenario more closely than the "intermediate" or "low" case. For the purpose of this report, copulation growth between the high and inter- mediate cases is assumed. 2.3 population Densit The population density in the planning area is relative- ly low. The number of persons per square mile in Konai, Soldotna, and the Central Peninsula are 1831 4101 and 7, respectively. This low population density has both positive and negative impacts on the viability of a resource recovery project. On the one hand, potential facility sites are available which are central to the distribution of NOW gener- ation, and which provide minimal impacts (such as traffic increases or property value impacts) to a surrounding resi- dential population. On the other hand, a low population density area will result in increased cost of hauling Now to a single central- ized resource recovery facility rather than multiple local landfills. Additionally, the dispersion of potential energy users makes it difficult to economically market energy pro- duced by a centralized resource recovery facility. The res- olution of the dispersed market for energy from the facility is one of the major issues addressed in this report. 2.4 Climate , The climatic characteristics of the Central Peninsula have a significant Impact on the technical makeup of the resource recovery project# in particular, the following climate -based considerations must be taken into account in the design of any facility or energy distribution system: • moisture content (and resulting heat value) of Mew, • seasonal delivery schedule of MSW, 2-4 49 F►� i -.. . ._ .. -- - -- - • seasonal variation of heating requirements by potential energy users, • insulation requirements for structures and piping, and • subsurface frost constraints for structures and piping. Graphs of annual average temperatures, precipitation, and snowfall for the City of Kenai are presented in Figure 2-3. The Central Peninsula receives a moderate amount of annual precipitation, with Kenai and Soldotna receiving annual average amounts of 19 and 17 inches respectively. However, since the NSW is for the most part deposited by residents in transfer containers which remain generally open, it is expected that the NSW will contain more moisture and have a lower heating value than other parts of the country. A description of the NSW heating values used for this report is presented in Section 3.1. The average annual temperature for both Kenai and Soldotna is 330P. Although a permanent subsurface frost is not characteristic of the region, care must be taken in the design of structural foundations and in the laying of pipe to prevent damage by frost -induced movement of struc- tures and freezing of water lines. The annual average tem- perature being only slightly above the freezing point will, have to be considered in the design of the facility's heated areas, insulation, and water storage vessels and piping. The annual average temperature profile of the region shows that there is a year -long need for heating by poten- tial users of energy from the facility. The magnitude of this annual heat demand is presented in Section S. The quantity of NSW disposed by residents of the Cen- tral Peninsula is strongly affected by the region's climate. During the winter months residents tend to allow more waste to accumulate at home and they tend to delay waste -generat- ing projects, such as construction or renovation, until the summer months, in addition, NSW disposal delivery schedules are affected by snowfall and ice. Therefore, weather condi- tions, coupled with a summertime influx of non-residents, tends to increase the summer quantities of NSW by approxi- mately 100 percent over the winter months. Additional details regarding the seasonal variation of waste generation are presented in Section 3.1. 2-S so 40 ro 30 20 10 rh 10 U I ; I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Months Sources "Kenai Peninsula Borough Solid Waste Management Plan", Trans Alaska Engineering/URS Company, September 1980. Figure 2-3. Climatic Conditions for the City of Kenai� (monthly averages) 2-6 2.S Inflation and Escalation The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers decreased by 0.5 percent from May 1982 to May 1983 and it has been essentially level since January 1981 at a value of around 2S0 to 260. Prior to January 1981, the CPI increased at a rate of approximately 8 percent per year from 1973. Due to the stability of oil prices, and an economic - growth dependence for the State on the wholesale price of oil, it would be reasonable to assume that this level trend -in the CPI will continue for the near term. However, the principal source of energy for the Central Peninsula is natural gas and, due to recent renegotiations in long-term contracts, Enstar (the local gas supplier) is increasing its gas prices over the next five years at a rate of between 6 and 9 percent per year, depending upon quantity of use. Thus, it would appear to be unwise not to assume some near - term inflation rate for the Central Peninsula. For the purpose of this report, the following inflation and cost escalation rates are assumed: • For general 'inflation: 5 percent per year until'July 1, 1986 and 7 percent per year there- after (to reflect a near -term repression of inflation followed by a return of historic inflation). • For gas price escalation (over and above the general inflation): 8 percent per year until July 1, 1988 and no real escalation thereafter (to reflect a national trend that gas price escalation generally matches inflation). • For electricity price escalation (over and above the general inflation): 5 percent per year until July 1, 1988 (60 percent of the gas price escalation, following the suggestion of Enstar) and 2 percent per year thereafter (to reflect a national trend that electricity cost escalation is generally higher than inflation). 0. 2-7 I .r I n e, NUMNNRNRIIIINWIMI� MIN, SECTION 3 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 Solid Waste The quantities' by weight of NSW disposed at the Kenai and Soldotna landfills from January 1981 to May 1983 are i presented in Table 3-1. The MSW r capita generation rate was 6.1 pounds per day in 1979.(P As shown in Table 3-1, the annual MSW generation for 1962 was 22,925 tons and this is equivalent to 6.3 pounds per capita per day. Thus, the MSW generation rate has been essentially constant over the past three years and a value of 6.2 pounds per capita per i day was used in this study. The composition of the NSW on the Central Peninsula is (�• affected primarily by climate and collection practice, as is s described in Section 2. The MSW tends to be wet, and a pre- vious study predicted the water conte t to be 40 percent, with a heat content of 3.,500 Btu/lb. �Z) No analysis has been performed for Central Peninsula NSW, however, and this prediction remains unverified. it is our belief that 3,500 Btu/lb is too low an estimate, based on a generally - accepted average heat value of 4,500 Btu/lb with 29 percent water for New England, a region witht3t�wice the annual precipitation of the Central Peninsula. We •recognize, however, that the collection practices for the Central Peninsula (waste deposited in collection boxes where it may be exposed to weather for an extended period of time) may be conducive to greater water absorption than New England and therefore a value of 4,000 Btu/lb is used for the analysis contained herein. 1 Table 3-2 presents estimated dry weight percentages of various. components of the MSW for the Central Peninsula as well as for the national average. Central Peninsula MSW is significantly higher in paper content and lower in garden waste than the national average. This provides added support to a choice of 4,000 Btu/lb fqr the heat content of the MSW. Due to winter weather conditions and summer tourist influx, the quantities of MSW generated show an extreme sea- sonal variation, approximately a difference of 100 percent between January and May. The seasonal variation for fiscal years 1982 and 1903 are shown in Figure 3-1. 3-1 Table 3-1 Central Peninsula Municipal Solid Waste Quantities Disposed Year Month Tons Per Tonsb 1981 1 950 30.7 2 1,350 48.2 3 1,450 46.6 4 2,000 66.7 5 2,050 66.1 6 2,300 76.7 7 2,000 64.5 8 2,875 92.7 9 1,550 51.7 10 1,425 46.0 11 1,325 .44.2 12 11050 33.9 Annual Totals 20,325 55.7 avg.1 1962 1 1,125 36.3 2 1,350 46.6 3 1,450 46.8 4 2,250 75.0 5 2,450 79.0 6 2,300 76.7 7 2,400 77.4 8 2,400 77.4 9 2,350 78-.3 10 11950 62.9 11 1,450 48.3 12 1,450 46.8 Annual Totals 22,925 62.8 avg.: 1983 1 1,300 41.9 2 1,350 48.2 3 1,950 62.9 4 1•1900 63.3 5 3,350 108.1 Projected Annual Total:c 26,181 71.7 avg. a. Source: Kenai Peninsula Borough weight records for Kenai and Soldotna landfills. b. Based on total days per month or per year; value to be multiplied by 1.25 to obtain equivalent resource recovery facility size. c. Calculation: (tons January -May 1983/tons January -May 1982)(annual tons 1982). 3-2 I rs P% I(t 1 •' 4 J r: Table 3-2 Estimated Dry -Weight Percentages of Various MSW Components Component Percentage for Kenai Peninsula Percentage for National Average Paper Products 44 31 Noncombustibles 26 21 Pood Waste 15 16 Garden Waste 6 19 Plastics, Rubber, 5 6 Leather Textiles 2 1 Wood 1 4 Source: Reference (2). 3-3 rt 1 100 9 iz 75 a► W4 :3 & SO r4b Ow W N� .w V .A 1 25 1901/92 1992/83 0 JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FED MAR APR MAY JUN MONTHS Figure 3-1. Average Daily Municipal Solid Wasto Collection gates ;j r I n �• r I. E 1 For the purpose of sizing the resource recovory Wit- ity, the population projeation for 19871 as shown on rigor® 2-2, is used, since full operations are projected for that year. As can be seen from the figure, the 1907 population is projected to be approximately 20,000 people and the ppopu- lation levels off at approximately 29,00 people in 19920 using a waste generation rate of 6,2 ibs/capita/ day, the annual M8w generated is projected to be 31,682 tons in 1907 Increasing to 32,800 in 1 #92. These values are used for facLILty design and revenue -estimating purposes. The fscil- j ity design calculations are presented in Section 7, 3, 2 B ntAaa septa a sources in the Central peninsula are primOrily residential septic tanks, although as0pta a is also collected from restaurants, motels, and chsmiaa� toilets at camp- grounds, Ninety percent, of the septage is pumped during seven months of the year, from mid -March through mid - October. Winter pumping occurs only for an emergency situ- ation, typically from leach field failure, Nino@ the cities of Kenai and 8oldotna currently have Provision for saptage treatment and disposal at their waste- water trestment plants, this facility will be designed for accepting septage from the following communities# • Cooper Landing • sterling • Ridgeway * Kalifonski • 8alamatof • Nikishka • Tustumens • Ninilchik Based on the 1902 special osnsus(41 aysrags of 2,s3 persons per household in these municipalities and using the population pprojection of rigors 2-2, it is assumed that the facility w111 a accepting waste from 17,800 people or 71000 households in 1907. Assuming that each household is pumped every S years and that *Bob pump load is 11000 gallons, the annual septage generation becomes 1040 million gallons in 1987* and increases to 1.45 million gallons in 1992. *$stimatinq method based on conversation with !i, Bambard, Borough project officer. 3-g i 1 The assumed compositi*r. of septage from the Central peninsula 'is presented in Table 3-3. it should be noted that the facility design values, the 9th column, are derived principally from Column 1, 6, and 7, which are values from Alaskan and Norwegian studies. 1 .. i p r I 1 f 7 t� i 3-6 i r w V Table 3-3 Septage Characteristics (all values in mg/l except for pH) Parameter la 2a 3a 4b 5b 6b 7b 8c Facility Design Values Total Solids 18,300 310000 38,600 15,000 14,000 53,900 - 38,800 22,000 Total Volatile 11,500 19,600 25,300 10,000 10,100 31,600 - 25,260 12,000 Solids Suspended Solids 14,000 170000 130300 - - 45,000 45,370 13,014 20,000 Volatile Suspended 10,000 11,000 8,700 - - 29,900 33,830 8,719 10,000 Solids Biochemical Oxygen 12,400 51900 5,000 10,000 4,700 81610 - 51000 10000 Demand Chemical Oxygen 62,500 259100 42,900 16,000 l5,300 42,550 64,530 42,850 50,000 Demand Total Organic - 7,000 9,900 - - - - 91930 91000 Carbon Total Kjeldahl - 500 690 - - - - 677 600 Nitrogen Ammonia Nitrogen - 90 160 1,600 280 113 157 157 150 Total Phosphorus - 190 250 - 150 171 138 253 150 pH 6.6 - - - 7.0 6.6 6.3 6.9 6.5 Grease - 6,500 9,100 - - - - .9,090 51000 Alkalinity as Cal- 1,020 950 - - - - - - 11000 cium Carbonate a. Sources Reference (5) Study Locations: - b. Sources Reference (6) 1. Alaska 5. Germany c. Sources Reference (7) 2. bower 48 (location not identified) 6. Normay ` 3. Lower 48 (location not identified) 7. Norway 4. Germany S. Lower 48 "National = - Average" I i11 ' f I 'r I' { I' 1 fi SECTION 4 CURRENT DISPOSAL PRACTICE 4.1 Municipal Solid Waste Municipal solid waste generated in the Central Penin- sula is currently disposed at two landfills, one in Kenai and one in Soldotna. These landfills are owned by the Borough and are operated by a single private contractor. Although present landfill capacity appears to be adequate for disposing of waste at current generation rates for the r� next 15 to 20 years, two mitigating factors have led the Borough to consider resource recovery as a disposal options s the increasing costs of landfill disposal which, historically, have risen ' at a rate faster than inflation, and e the rapidly increasing population of the Cen- tral Peninsula which, at the current annual ., rate of 13 percent, has the dual effect of using landfill capacity at an accelerated rate and reducing the availability of local sites for future landfill development. The increase in costs of landfill disposal in the Cen- tral Peninsula reflect the experience of communities nation -wider these costs are increasing because of two factorst revisions in landfill disposal regulations, and the rebid- ' ding or renegotiation of disposal contracts. Landfill costs are expected to follow this patterns 1. Costs increase with inflation for 2 to 5 years. 2. Costs undergo a step increase after the 2 to 5 year period to reflect changes in regulations and/or renegotiated contracts. s 3. Costs proceed to increase with inflation dur- ing the next 2 to 5 year period. The above trend has the overall effect of increasing land- fill disposal cost at a rate above that of inflation. i 4-1 Recent landfill disposal costs for the Central penin- sula are presented in Table 4-1. As is shown by the Table, ; landfill costs remained constant from FY80 (Distal Year *� 1980, representing the period from July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1990) through FY81, reflecting a two-year landfill contract with a private firm having no adjustment provisions for inflation. upon rebidding of the landfill contract, the ' average cost per ton for disposal increased by 39 percent in FY82 and 32 percent in FY83, thereby representing an overall �! equivalent annual increase of 22 percent from July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1903. The large increases in FY82 and FY83 are primarily accounted for by the need to tighten control over operation to meet environmental requirements. This is expected to increase in the near -term -- specifically at the conclusion of the current landfill contract -- and be a fact of life for all future landfill operations. The current landfill contract is subject to annual escalation for inflation and is due to expire in June 1986, after which time another incremental jump in landfill cost Is expected. Following conversation with the Borough's project officer for this study, it was decided to apply a 30 percent increase to the landfill cost at that time and then continue to escalate at a rate of one point above inflation thereafter. It is believed that a 30 percent increase is reasonable, given the historic data and the even greater tightening in operations contemplated for the next contract. An escalation rate of one point above inflation after June 1986 is intended to reflect future incremental jumps, and yet be conservative in light of the fact that conditions requiring these jumps cannot be specifically identified at �. this time. It is important to note that the above assumptions used for escalation of landfill costs may take a predominant role in determining the feasibility of a resource recovery facil- ity for the Borough since the facility's costs of Msw dis- posal will be compared with those projected for landfill disposal. 4.2 8ectaae Septage is currently haule•9 and disposed of by private contractors responding to contacts made by individual house- holds or business establishments. Septage is now disposed 4-2 IIM+A �i+hwiii�w�: itiri - .ON r usaandF.�aw.aw�aNMf — ` / A i W Table 4-1 Recent Landfill Disposal Costs for the Central Peninsula Fiscal Year a Annual Tonnage b Annual Cost b (dollars) Cost Per Ton (dollars) Percent Increase from Preceding Year 1980 16,491 254,800 13.70 - 1981 18,591 255,300 13.73 0 1982 20,918 399,500 19.10 39 1963 24,980 629,400 25.20 32 a. Fiscal Year 1980 refers to July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1980. b. Sources Nowland D. Bambard, Borough project officer for this study. m In pits on private land in the Central Peninsula area. Although the pits are reputed to contain wooden "cribs" to allow for percolation of the liquid into the ground, it is likely that the pit construction is merely a ditch developed by back -hoe and closed when the soil pores are clogged with solids. Some haulers admit to having discharged septage onto isolated gravel roads ii the past and it is possible that this practice continues.i�� r The cost for dumping, according to one of the haulers, is now at 60 dollars per thousand gallons, excluding trans- portation. Although the future availability of the above method of disposal is unknown at present, it is assumed that this cost will increase at a rate which is 2 percent above Inflation after July 1, 1906 to allow for greater control over operations to maintain future compliance with regula- tory permits. The cities of Kenai and Soidotna each have capability for septage disposal at their wastewater treatment plants. However, this capability is not currently being used because' disposal charges are around 0100 per thousand gallons. 4-4 i-J . ., ., IT, SECTION 5 POTENTIAL ENERGY USERS The principal energy users in the Central Peninsula are various public buildings in Soldotna for a hot water loop, Homer Electric Company for electricity, five chemical plants In Nikishka for process steam, and several canneries along th• Kenai River for process steam. Of the preceding list, the Kenai River canneries were excluded from evaluation because of their seasonal (June to September) operations, low perceived total energy usage, and locations. The remaining potential energy users are described in this section. Escalations of current energy costs are described In Section 2 of this report.• In accordance with the two-phase approach undertaken for this feasibility evaluation, all cost estimates in this report, with the exception of capital and operating costs, are reported in July 1983 dollars and all future -year costs are projected from that date. Capital and operating cost estimates are reported in January 1984 dollars. 5.1 Pub iia Buildinas The following public buildings were considered as energy users.• These buildings are located starting from the west side of the Kenai River and across the river eastward, approximately along Redoubt Avenue: • Kalifonsky Beach Elementary school (under. construction) • Kenai Community College • Soldotna Elementary School • Soldotna Junior High School • Soldotna High school • Redoubt Elementary School • School warehouse •' Borough Municipal Building • Central Peninsula Hospital All ,of the above buildings are heated year-round by indi- vidual boiler systems. These systems are essentially iden- tical in design parameters and operate at 180 to 1900P, 15 psig, using water as the transfer medium. In addition, the hospital has some steam usage for autoclaving, dishwashing, and food warming. Total fuel consumption for the public 5-1 e f� buildings is presented in Table 9.1. The values in this table were generated using actual energy consumption figures+I for the various public buildings listed above, adjusting the Kenai Community College data (of five months including the newly -constructed Goodrich Building) to reflect a full i year's consumption. i The total annual energy usage for the public buildings Is shown by the table to be 68,990 million Btu. Current rates for natural gqas, as quoted by Enstar, for commercial - fixed users is $1.60 per thousand cubic feet, using a heat value of 1,000 Stu's per cubic foot or 1 million Btu's per thousand cubic feet of gas, the annual fuel cost for the year ending July 1983 is caleu'l&ted to be $110,384 for all r ; of the public buildings. 5*2 Romer -Electric Comoa Homer Electric Company is a regional cooperative distribution system which purchases power from Chugach Electric Company, the areas power generator. Electric power is generated exclusively by natural gas on the Kenai Peninfula and it is sold to Homer Electric at a current avOrage rate of $0.03 (seasonally variable from 0.027 to 0.032) per kwh. Homer Electric, in turn, sells power to commercial establishments on the basis of a monthly fixed charge, a kWh usage charge, and, a maximum instantaneous demand charge. There are no provisions in the current rate structure for peak and off-peak usage. Examination of power bills for the Central Peninsula Hospital indicates that its usage averages approximately $0.045 per kwh charge. For the purpose of this report, it is assumed that Homer Electric would buy power from the resource recovery facility at an equal price that it is paying to Chugach electric. it is important to note that, at present, the location or locations of the electric interconnections to the Homer Electric distribution system have not yet been identified and will require further discussion with the power company. It is assumed for this report that the cost for inter- connection is included in the contingency applied to the capital cost estimate (see section 7 for cost estimates) for the electric generating alternatives. However, if this cost were found at a later date to be substantial,, the capital costs may require revision. 5-2 w w Table 5-1 I Seasonal Variation of Energy Consumption for Public Buildingsa (in million Btu) i Year Monthb Actualc consumption Adjustment for Kenai Community college Adjusted Total 1901 December 5,740 300- 6,040 1982 January 8,590 470 9,060 February 8,250 210 6,460 March 7,820 130 70950 April 6,490 210 6,700 May 4,790 230 50020 June 3,600 290 3,890 July 2,930 180 3,110 August 2,850 160 3,010 September 3,500 190 3,690 October 5,04O 210 51250 November 6,560 250 61,010 Annual Totals 68,990 a. See text for list of buildings. b. Although data were collected up to March 1983, the months listed are those with the most complete records. a. Excluding Kalifonsky Beach Elementary School. d. Five months of data for Goodrich Building extrapolated to year- round use. 5~4 | ~ ^ � ' |/ . � .. '. � / ' ^»� ' ^ ' � |' � - | V8 r I if Table 5-2 Summary of Potential Annual Revenuesa Energy Type Annual Revenues b (July 1983 Dollars) 1. Hot water for public 110,000 buildings 2. Electric power generation 368,000 3. Cogeneration (hot water to 421,000 public buildings) 4. Steam for industrial use 304,000 5. Hot water for industrial 355,000 use 6. Cogeneration (steam) for 607,000 industrial use a. Bee text for assumptions relating to above values. b. in accordance with the two-phase structure of the feasibility study, data collection for this report was performed as of July 1903 and all future -year costs are projected from that date. 5-5 i l� i - a' 0 1. Not Water Generation for Public Buildings These annual potential revenues are reported in Section 5.1 as 01100000. 2. Electric Power Generation (31,700 tons/yr)(2,000 lb/ton) (41000 Btu/ib)(0.6 boiler efficiency) (0.29 ggross power production efficiency) ,0.000293 kwh/Btu)($0.03/kwh) • $338,000 per year 3. Cogeneration (generation of both electricity and steam or hot water simultaneously) (31,700 tons/yr)(2,000 ib/ton)(4,000 Btu/ib) • 152#160 million.Btu/yreavailablenheat from facility t68,990 million Btu consumed(1/0.95 pipeline heat loss) • 72,621 million Btu supplied as hot water therefore, 72,621 million Btu facility output as cogeneration and 79,539 million Btu facility output as electric power only. for cogeneration: (72,621 x 106 Btu/yr) �0.17 ggross power production efficienc) (0.000293 kwh/8tu)($0.03/kwh) + $110#090 • 0218,517 per year for power only generation: (79,539 x 106 Btu/yr) (0.29 gross power production efficiency) (0.000293 kwh/Stu)($0.03/kwh) w $202,752 per year Total Revenues - $421,000 per year 4. Steam for Industrial Use (31,700 tons/year)(2,000 ib/ton)(4,000 Stu/lb) (0.6 boiler efficiency)(i/1,250 Btu/lb steam) (thousand lb. steam/1,000)($2.50/thousand lb. steam) w $304,000 per year 5-6 �' a 6 Not Water for Industrial Use (31000 tons/yr)(2,000 lb/ton)(4,000 Btu/1b) (0.7 boiler efficiency)(1/200 Btu/lb water) housand lb. water/1,000)($0.40Vthousand The water) m $355,000 per year . Hiectricity for Industrial Use (31000 tons/yr)(2,000 ib/ton)(4,000 Btu/lb) (0.6 boiler efficiency) (0.29 gross power production efficiency) (0.000293 kwh/Btu)($0.04/kwh) $517,000 per year . Coaeneration for Industrial se,(S� (Steam) (3 ON tons/yr)(2,000 ib/ton)(4,000 Stu/lb) (0.6 boiler efficiency) (0.17 gross power production efficiency) (0.000293 kwh/Btu)($0.04/kwh) ♦ 0304P000 m $607,000 per year • IM I 4 F .. , I oa, t I t 1 I n i 5-7 a i r, r J n„ SECTION 6 POTENTIAL FACILITY SITES four potential sites for the resource recovery facility were identified by the Borough's project officer for this study. The following is a description of each of the four sites, in alphabetical order. 1. Borough Building Area East of the Borough administration building bordering on Shady Lane is a cleared tract of approximately 3 acres that is part of the Borough -owned parcel. Due to its proxim- ity to the administrative building and nearby residential areas, this potential site is far from being an ideal choice and was examined solely as an alternative to other locations available. However, since the facility requires approximate- ly five acres of land, this site was dropped from considera- tion because of lack of sufficient space. Z. Hiah School West of Soldotna high school is an approximately 17 acre tract of uncleared land awned by the Borough. This site is limited in appeal because the road on which trucks would haul NOW and residue (Marydaie Avenue) is residential, thereby creating a neighborhood impact. Additionally, the presence of black spruce on the land' indicates a subsurface stratum of peat which would have to be excavated and filled with clead material. However, this site is kept in consider- ation because it is on the east side of the Kenai River and would therefore not require a pipe bridge over the river for the hot water loop. The site topography is level and the soil, with the exception of the peat stratum, is good. it should be noted that the energy revenue projections for this site (Section 5) have been reduced from the Kalifonsky Beach site revenues to account for the loss of the Community College as an energy user. 3. Kalifonskv Beach The Kalifonsky Beach site is an approximately 18-acre Borough -owned parcel on the west side of the Kenai River on Poppy Lane in the vicinity of the Community College and the 6-1 E1 ' i . 0 i Ralifonsky Beach Elementary School (which is under construc- tion). it is level land and vegetated with evergreens. The j gravel soil is typical of the region. The access roads to the site are non-residential and are fed by a major highway, i Ralifonsky Beach Road. However, this site requires a pipe bridge over the Kenai River for a hot water loop to the Borough public buildings. An advantage to the site, because j Of its proximity to the Community College, is that it can potentially be used by college students as a resource for engineering or boiler operation studies. 4. t�i)ishka industries major potential energy users are located on the North Road near Nikishka and, because of their process steam demands, they are evaluated in this report. Adequate land is available surrounding each industrial plant and, from the fsoilitnae the soiapproximately ten -acre plot at the Collier y gravel with no complicating features. For this report, it is assumed that the cost of site pur- chase is $60 thousand per ears, which includes appraisals, legal services, and energy contract negotiations. A transportation analysis of the current NOW collection picture shows that the theoretical center of waste genera- tion for the Central Peninsula is located close to the Kali- fonsky Beach site. A facility located at this site would represent the lowest cost of transporting NOW, relative to a facility at any other location. The incremental cost of transporting NOW to the Nikishka industries site, relative to Kalifonsky Beach, is estimated to be 070,000 dollars per year in January 1964 dollars. This is equivalent to a present-day additional cost of $1.83 per ton using the annual facility capacity of 32,800 tons. it should be noted that the cost projections presented in Figure 1-1, Table 1-2, and the cost analysis in Section 8 include this incremental transportation cost. The details of the transportation analysis are provided in Appendix A. 6-2 - I.I.-Al, �i J I � i SECTION 7 FACILITY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 7.1 dummarsof _Design A block flow diagram for the facility is presented in Figure 7-1. The facility is designed to receive 110 tons per day of solid waste, 1.4 million gallons per year of septage, and waste oil at a rate to be determined during operations.* The facility will produce solely electric power if sited in the center of the waste generation area and will cogenerate electric power and steam if sited at the Industries along the North Road in Nikishka. The facility will be operated seven days per week, 24 hours per day. Septage is dewatered by the addition of coagulating chemicals and the use of a mechanical filter. The solids are dried further by the application of SOOOF combustion gas in a dryer. Following the dryer, the sludge is mined with waste oil to enhance its heat content and then it is placed in the incinerator where it is burned. The solid waste is injected directly into the inciner- ator where it serves as the fuel for combustion. Steam is produced in a boiler which is used to drive a turbine for electric power production. in the case of the facility located on the North Road, the spent steam would then be transmitted, via a pipeline, to an industry for process use. The waste products from this facility are comprised of liquid effluent from the filter, grit from the septage de- gritter, ash from the incinerator, and gas from the combus- tion. The liquid effluent from the filter will be disposed of through a subsurface leach field, the ash from the incin- erator will be quenched in a water tank and iandfilled, and the combustion gas will be thoroughly cleaned with a bag house. Grit from the degritter will either be transported to the tipping floor and incinerated or will be iandfilled. The waste oil is to be blended with the dried septage before combustion to enhance the destruction of the sep- tage! actual flow rates of oil are to be operationally determined based upon its blendability with the dried septage. 7-1 i I• G> r I1 f I 1 1 f I! 1 i I f I I - r I� of son OVraG11 I Flaws J-j KBNAI PENINSULA --- - - - R!lOYAC! ARCOYlRY ALASKA @LOCK FLOW DIAGRAM an.r nr� aIr I 1 1 The facility layout, including floor arrangement and side views, is presented in Figure 7-2. The facility has an overall floor dimension of 140 feet by 220 feet and is con- structed of a pre-engineered metal sided building. All oper- ations are totally enclosed except for the turbine condenser and the 2.0. fan and bag house. The septage and waste oil receiving tanks are external to the structure and under- ground. The structure is designed with a clear span truss support system over the tipping floor, where trucks maneuver to discharge waste and front-end loaders maneuver to store the waste and to feed the incinerators. A beam and column support system is used in the rest of the facility where vehicle movement is not a critical consideration. The incin- erator is placed in a recessed pit in order to allow a direct infeed of waste from the tipping floor. Each item of equipment has its own foundation and the floor slab is con- structed of 8-inch thick reinforced concrete. The tipping floor has a hardened surface to protect against wear by vehicles, the impact of dropping solid waste, and the scrap- ing of the blade of a front-end loader. ; i It is assumed for all three potential sites that the water table is sufficient depth to not require special construction techniques. For the Ralifonsky Beach site, soil reports indicate dense stilly gravel from 4 to 21 feet with mixed cobbles or sand. indications are that no piles or other extraordinary construction activities are required. For the Soldotna High School site, the soil is loss desirable. The presence of black spruce indicates subsurface peat which would require excavation and backfill with selected material, in addition, the cost of piles beneath the structure and all major equipment items is Included in the cost estimate for this site, p As is seen from Figure 7-2, the facility incorporates a tipping and storage area rather than a pit. A tipping floor is selected for safety reasons to accommodate the wide rangge of vehicle types expected to discharge NOW, including resi- dents, and to accommodate scavenging which is encouraged in the Central peninsula (and elsewhere in the state). it is believed that a refuse pit with moving crane would be an area with a high likelihood of accidents. The tipping floor is designed for three-day storage with ease of access around the storage pile for rubber -tired loaders which move the NOW and feed the furnace. Both the tipping floor and the septage dewatering areas are kept under negative pressure to prevent the escape of 10 7-S I ow at' u• 1_ Aa.P. a � � / • 1 OLOAN /►NY I Field Gritty My 0 OOIMN evil/Y k / L • d INIIHNA/M 1 • 1 rlrrlmo P{0M o neon MM I / NnNdiN - NO G bl No{I•w.oM • nr. �'' ' tIL 7n, k k -f,- T .�!! - ELEVAr1oN it �;,3 (��,■ (:( rl I NAIr/ es A/O/IrIW rMN— / nnA "items 1 1 low W �• W ..• PLAN . V 0 , r And OGGIONAIION 1/ Fund GININA1,00 of $got&" InalwNI PA.1{ttln PI NNININAI/M PAi1N1110 II /Y/liNpM II 414/Ir1N. IANNe IHINM•INI 11 Pont NoPposs ` // too{* d m00$ peo 11 IAN/t 61 oPPSWNI meson IAlO •1 INOININA/M ' 11' • IOwININ/ A/ atst /IL/i1 M/i• N 9/60IAN1 iN/YpN � II 01116/ •1 0Ams Manx o Map, •/ 001914 • � PI t06Mm0 A noNIGONo o1 o0tatlN Ir", - o1 toMMliM II NAlmlessmaI to list WAIN 60011FIN FNNPo •i PBIwININ COMAS{ nu1wM1 PI 0067108416 Flats0IM dtilon /1 10. PAN EL VMIO .1 9" ow t1 mil W Norut flue" Mr1m 11 .omntom Flours 7-2 "! KENAI PENINSULA ALASKA RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - - r• .u• - 'Piat••1•ir � p J M {R odors from the facility. The air from these locations is used as combustion air for the furnace. Water is obtained from on -site wells and treated to boiler purity with a package unit chemical deionizer. Wastewater is transferred to the subsurface system for disposal. 7.2 Facility -Components This section provides an item -by -item description of the equipment contained in the facility. Incinerator/Boiler Several types of furnaces have been considered: rotary furnaces, fixed -bed furnaces, and multiple -staged reciprocat- ing hearths, all of the factory -built type. Energy recovery will be accomplished by the use of n waste heat boilers, 9enerating steam at approximately 60008 and 450 psi. The following manufacturers of furnaces are considered as possible suppliers and descriptions of equipment and approximately acquisition cost have been obtained. e Cadoux Systems e Consumat Inainerators, Inc. e Enercon Thermal Systems,. Ina# e someline-Sanderson, Inc. The Enercon System and Consumat System are similar in their combustion chambers. The primary chambers are rectan- 9uiar, having three or four stepped hearths on which refuse is hydraulically pushed by means of rams. Agitation of the refuse occurs as waste is pushed from one hearth to the next suacesding lower level hearth. The systems have an impor- tant difference, however, in that Enercon is operated at excess air while Consumat is typically operated at substoich- iometric air. The Cadoux furnace consists of oscillating grates which are constructed of steel. while the principle is similar to that of Consumat, the size of the grates and the individual components are smaller, allowing for better distribution of underf ire air. The Komeline-Sanderson unit is significantly different from the other three suppliers in that the primary chamber r� rA 7-9 i 1 � is a rotary kiln. The rotary kiln has many advantages over i the other proposed technologies in that burnout would be F more complete and the amount of energy captured from refuse Is greater than in the other systems. The disadvantage is the slightly higher construction cost for the system. All suppliers, except Cadoux, choose to provide their own boilers. Since there are numerous manufacturers of waste heat boilers, this can be considered a shelf item and selection of the appropriate fabricator can be left to the furnace supplier. what would be necessary is that the size of the boiler and the steam generation capacity be firmly specified. It is proposed to construct a minimum of two furnaces having a capacity of 55 tons per day. This would allow con- tinuous operation should one furnace require maintenance and F shutdown. Enercon and Consumat would provide furnaces hav- ing nominal 'capacity of approximately 55 tons per day per furnace. Nomelino- Sanderson proposes to supply four rotary { furnaces since their largest available unit is approximately l 30 tons pgr day. Cadoux would provide three furnaces of 37 tons per day capacity each. c Physical size of the selected equipment should lie in the range of 30 to 40 feet long for each furnace, approxi- mately 18 to 20 feet high, and 0 feet wide. Secondary ohambers will be slightly smaller and will be mounted direct- ly above the primary burning chamber, The boiler and econo- mizer combination will be approximately 50 feet long by 10 feet wide by approximately 15 feet tali. Shipping of the furnace and boiler components will require consideration of oversized loads, since further breakdown into smaller compon- E. ants is not possible. Shipping weights are likely to be in excess of 50 tons per unit. Turbine Generator A two megawatt 25,000 pound per hour condensing turbine generator with an air-cooled condenser is provided. The a climate in the region is quite suitable for air condensing, ;. given the low annual average ambient temperatures present. 4 ago HOU ! --- ; A baghouse is selected over an electrostatic prscipita- EI for for air pollution control because of its relative ease ,EE of maintenance by persons with general mechanical abilities. 1 The bags are designed for high temperature operation and 7-10 j ' r 1 r I I -- If --- use of this air pollution control device should provide exceptionally clean and essentially transparent stack emis- sions. The bags are subject, however, to deterioration by high temperature excursions of the exhaust gas which is usually caused by incorrect plant operations. if this is perceived by the Borough to be a vulnerability of the sys- tem, we recommend that the Borough consider the addition of a water quench reactor upstream of the baghouse or an auto- matically -activated dump stack to ensure low bag tempera- tures or an alternative air pollution control system. Stack The stack will be a free standing refractory -lined steel type, approximately 4 feet diameter by 90 feet high and will weigh about 100#000 pounds. Ash and Residue Handling 8vatems Residue from the incinerator will be discharged into a water filled concrete trough and then transported by a drag conveyor to a dumpster located outdoors on grade under a shed roof. Fly ash from the baghouse may be discharged into the same dumpster via a screw conveyor or directly into a separate dumpster located below the baghouse. Forced t Pans There are two forced draft fans each rated at 7,100 SCFM. These will be heavy duty industrial type with drip - proof electric motors. Induced Draft Pan The I.D. fan is rated at 15,000 SCPM at 5000P, heavy duty industrial construction, with totally enclosed fan cooled electric motor. Electrical Switchaear This consists of a two megawatt electrical substation with step-up transformer to most the specifications of Romer Electric for connecting directly with its existing tranamie- ,sion system. Holler Water Treatment System The system will consist of a packaged industrial twin water softening unit and a chemical feed system complete with tanks, pumps, and automatic controls. 7-11 I i Waste The tank is a fiberglass reinforced polyester under- ground storage tank with a capacity of 10,000 gallons. septage Receiving Tanks Two 5,000-gallon fiberglass reinforced polyester tanks will be installed underground for the receipt of septage. The tanks are sloped toward the discharge end and have access by means of manhole. septage Grinder Pumps and Decritter Two 20-gallon per minute pumps are installed to trans- fer septage from the storage tanks through the dewatering system. The pumps are upstream of a cyclone degritter which eliminates such inert and abrasive materials as sand and stones. The inert material is sent to landfill for dis- posal. Polymer and Fiber reed Systems Polymer is added to the septage to agglomerate and coag- ulate solids for filtration. Fiber is also added to the sep- tage to create a mat base which is more conducive to filtra- tion than if the coagulated solids were filtered alone. The fibers provide a physical platform upon which the coagulated solids rest, thereby reducing carry-over of small solids through the filter or clogging of the filter pores by these small solids. The fiber used is a synthetic polymeric mate- rial which is readily combustible in the incinerator. The polymer feed system includes a 350 gallon aging tank to allow the polymer to contact and coagulate the sep- tage solids. Both the fiber and the polymer are blended with separate one-half horsepower mixers. Belt Filter Press one 9,000-gallon per day belt filter press is installed to provide mechanical dewatering of the coagulated septage solids. The belt filter press acts like a ringer washer in that the septage is injected between cloth rollers where it Is mechanically squeezed. The liquid passes through the cloth while the solid is retained on its surface. 7-12 Min ubsurface Disposal Svetem The liquid portion of the septage is transported to a 20,000 gallon fiberglass reinforced polyester subsurface holding tank where any remaining solids are allowed to settle before disposal through a leach field. This holding tank serves to reduce the potential of clogging the soil pores by these remaining solids. The leach field is com- pooed of a gravel -!!lied deep trench system in accordance with Department of $nvironmental Conservation regulations. Six trenches are constructed ten feet apart with dimensions of 2 feet wide by 55 feet long. The application rate of this system is 2.5 gallons per square foot per day. Three monitoring wells and laboratory equipment are provided to monitor the effectiveness of the subsurface treatment pro- vided by this system. Rotary Sludae Dryer Following the belt filter press in the septage treat- ment system, the dewatered sludge is further dried to facil- itate its combustion. A direct -fired rotary dryer is pro- posed for this drying process. The sludge dryer will be small, having physical dimensions of 4 feet in diameter by 15 feet long.. The dryer will receive filtered septage which has been put through a delumper or palletizer to reduce its size. The source of energy in the dryer will be sidestream flue gas exiting from the boiler. Temperature of the gas at that point is expected to be approximately 5000F. The drive train for the rotary dryer will be external and, because of the relatively low temperatures involved, no high temperature problems will result. All gases exiting from the dryer will be directed as combustion air into the Incinerator for odor control. Ribbon Blender This item will mix approximately 200 pounds per hour septage filter cake with waste oil. it will be about a 12 Inch bowl width by 24 inches long and be coupled to a screw conveyor for feeding the mixture to the incinerator. 7.3 Facility Capacity and Septace incinerator The design capacity of the facility is 32,800 tons per year, as described in Section 3.1. using an availability rate of 62 percent to account for scheduled and unscheduled 7-13 r >A i Tv downtime, the daily design capacity calculates to approxi- mately 110 tons per day in accordance with the following calculation: (32#800 tons/yr)365 C Xaye yr ava / 110 tons/day Following the septage treatment system, the septage will be rendered to approximately 20 percent solids prior to Incineration. As is described in Section 7.2, the septage treatment system is chosen for its production of a readily - burnable cake without the addition of chemicals harmful to the furnace or the flue -gas train. Using values of 6,000 Btu/lb of solids, 75 percent of solids are combustible, 1,900 Btu/lb water for vaporization, and 20 percent solids In septage following the belt filter press, the following calculation shows the amount of heat required to dispose of a pound of septage cake: (0.2 lb solids)(0.75 combustible)(6,000 Btu/lb) heat generated by solids combustion - (0.2 lb solid)(025 non-combustible) 0.25 Btu/oF) i 450oF - 400F) r heat lost to ash - (0.8 lb water)t1,900 MAW a -625 Btu heat to vaporize water The, feed rate of septage cake is approximately 200 pounds an hour during the seven months of the year that septage is pumped. This is equivalent to a heat demand of 130,000 Btu. The heat available in the furnace per hour is approximately 36 million Btu and the loss of heat to the combustion of septage is seen to be insignificant. 7.4 Fioeiins and Five Bridge For the resource recovery alternatives that include hot water for the public buildings as an energy product, a hot water pipe loop znd a pipe bridge over the Kenai River is conceptually designed and costed. The hot Water loop is made up of 6 inch steel pipe for the delivery of hot water and the return of cooled water. " Both the delivery and return lines are placed in a 21 inch 7-14 0 diameter sheet steel casing which is packed with insulation. r The pipes are placed such that a minimum of 3 inch of insul- ation separates each pipe and the pipe from the wall of the casing. Both the pipe and the casing are field -welded and pressure -tested. The entire assembly' is laid at the bottom Of a 10 ft trench, except where the line crosses the Kenai River. A The bridge crossing for the insulated pipeline is accom- plished by a suspension cable from two steel towers on each side of the river. The cable and towers have lateral stays and supports for wind loads. The west (Community College) tower is low and the east tower is approximately 60 ft high. The pipe is elevated (minimum elevation of 50 ft) for,ap- proximately 260 ft to cross the Kenai River and the lowland immediately adjoining the river. It is estimated that approximately 22,000 ft of trench and 38,000 ft of pipe are required for the entire steam loop, including building hookups. ! J 7.5 7_401lity Operations anCMaintenanee The facility is operated continuously for 7 days per week, 24 hours per day. This is equivalent to 21 working shifts per week, thereby requiring four sets of crew, with one shift per week covered by overtime or part-time help. There are a total of 13 permanent staff for facility opera- tions, and this number may be supplemented by part-time workers in case of illness or contracted work for major main- tenance. The job titles and a description of activities are described in Table•7-1. Incoming NOW is dumped on the tipping floor where it is handled by a loader operator. The waste is either piled for storage or fed to the charging hoppers on a pre -determined basis or at the direction of the boiler operator. A section Of the tipping floor is set aside for scavengers and it is the loader operator's responsibility to maintain NOW in this areas steaming rates, charging rates, combustion tempera-tures, air flow, soot blowing, blowdown, and power genera- tion are the responsibility of the boiler operator. This Person operates the furnace and turbine generator from a control panel and additionally makes periodic visual inspec- tions of the system's operations. 7-15 r a 1 Table 7-1 Pacility Operating Personnel Titan Number Activities Plant Manager 1 • licensed boiler operator • supervises day-to-day facility operations • supervises maintenance of inventory e assists Borough Engineer in personnel management and achoduling • assists Borough Engineer in scheduling mainte- nance and hiring outside contractors Licensed Boiler 3 • responsible for combustion and power generation Operator • determines feed rate of NSW and septage performs preventative maintenance during oper- ating periods and minor maintenance during shutdown periods Loader Operator 4 e operates loader on tipping floor • feeds NOW to charging hopper • maintains waste storage pile • supervises scavengers performs minor maintenance during facility shut- Naintenance/Crew 4 • performs preventative maintenance during oper- Personnel ating period and major maintenance during shut- down • operates septage treatment system • delivers residue to landfill Secretary/Clerk 1 • performs secretarial functions, including billings to energy user • oversees truck weighings fir`----.-- -___ _ -- - _ --- - -- -- ------------ �i'wiiiruiiiieiw�i Daily routine maintenance, troubleshooting, and major maintenance during facility shutdown are performed by the maintenance/crew personnel. In addition, 'this person oper- ates the septage treatment system and, delivers residue to the landfill in the facility's dump trucks. The facility is expected to operate at half capacity for ten weeks per year while scheduled maintenance is per- formed on one combustion train at a time. This ten -week period will be during the winter months when the supply of Mew is lowest. An additional ten weeks per year at half capacity for unscheduled maintenance is estimated to occur. Large maintenance expenditures are expected to occur every five to seven years for placement of refractory, replacement of superheater tubes, or overhauling the turbine generator. 'F+ n ' a� l 7-17 tP SECTION 8 r I s COST ESTIMATE i 8.1 Capital Costs i The following list describes the components and considerations included in each line item of capital cost. Installation or erection is included in•each line item and shipping is included for factory -built equipment. 1. ,Site Works access roads, landscaping, and other related itemst and piling and fill for the High School site. 2, uiidin s reinforced concrete foundations I onace, boiler, turbine generator, and j all auxiliary equipments prefabricated build- ing shell and all stairs, walkways, and access ' platforms. , 3, ro e i ments all stationary equipment related to septage storage and processing, Incinwaste oil storage, subsurface disposal, -eration, power generation, ash removal, and air pollution control and front-end loader for waste feeding. b" 4, aline: closed -loop supply and return p ping, insulation and casing system, excava- tion, welding, pressure 'testing , and backfill- I tag. S, Plog arid as support towers, lateral sup -ports, as a and suspenders. 6, obi i ati Demo ii z do s construction costs associated with organizing and disband- ing required personnel and equipment. '. 7. Contin enc s concept modifications, oleo - trio tisi-linep and contingency. ' 8, winter constructions allowance for heated - work space and delays imposed by winter con- struction, f r 1 r I - ' -. ice- .. � _. —_ ... _.. � >.�r: s_...,�--r--•----.,... . f 9. Contractor anaineerri,ngL and. Profits facility j engineering fees, construction supervision, and turnkey contractor profit. 10. Scare Parts and Mobile Rauioments spare parts, tools, two dump trucks. ii. Bh„�ake_ oce t nco Testina: costs associ- sted with facility startup and acceptance test- ing operations. The capital cost estimates of each of the four alterna- tives investigated are presented in Table 8-1. Back-up Information and cost worksheets for each line item are pre- sented in Appendix B for reference. It is assumed that the Borough will receive funding from federal and state grant sources for portions of these capital costs (see Section 8.3 for assumed grant amounts). 0.2 fteratina Cost The following list describes the components and consid- orations included in each line item of operating cost. 1. Personnels salary cost of permanent staff. 2. Utilities and Sucoliess in -plant electric power usage, chemicals, phone, auxiliary fuel, and laboratory testing. 3. Ifilatenances materials and contract labor for annual maintenancel unexpended annual funds should, be contributed to maintenance fund to cover major work every live to seven years. 4. handlills landfill disposal of ash and residue following combustion. S. zncromqtal Transportations the incremental cost relative to the Kai fonsky Beach site to transport NOW to the Nikishka Industries site. 6. Miscellaneous and SantAngoans insurance, legal counsel, overtime or part-time employ- eeo, and unforeseen operating expenses. 8-2 I nj 1A Table 8-1 Capital Cost Estimate for Alternatives InVestigateda,b (thousands of dollars) Item Kalitonsky Beach electric Generation Nikishka Industries Cogeneration Kalifonsky Beach Cogeneration High School Cogeneration 1. Site Work 399 399 309 1,106 2. Building 2,452 2,452 2,452 2,492 3. Process equipmont 3,634 3,634 30634 3434 4. Mobilisation/Dembiliaation 18 18 18 18 S. Pipeline •• 1S2 3,45S 1,054 6. Pipe Bridge -- 462 -- Subtotal° 6,S03 6,65E 10,420 9,144 7. Contingency A 1S4 979 990 1,563 i,372 S. Minter Construction 32% 333 S21 457 subtotal 7,803 7,986 12,504 100973 9. Contractor engineering 1,S61 1,597 2,501 2,19S and Profit 0 200 10. Spare Parts and Mobile 275 275 27S 275 Equipment It. Shakedown/Aacsptance 300 300 300 300 Testing 12. Lend Cost 0 300 0 0 TOTAL 9,939 10,450 1S,S80 13,743 i a. Inotall" capital costs in January 1984 dollars. b. Cost backup for each category provided in Appendix B. o. Includes 30 percent subcontractors overhead and profit. 0 ' The annual operating costs for each of the potential sites are presented in Table 6-2 and backup information is con - Mined in Appendix B. The operating and maintenance costs are increased by 15 percent for the first year to reflect contract operations during that Year by the facility's turnkey contractor. The objectives at this first year contract operations are to train Borough personnel and to undergo a second acceptance test at the end of the contract period. 8.3 Bond Issues general Obligation bond financing is assumed for rais- ing capital funds for the facility. It is also assumed that the facility is eligible and will receive the following capital grants from state and federal sources* e 50 percent grant funding for incinerator with- out heat recovery e 60 percent grant funding for resource recovery facility e 87.51 grant funding for septage treatment system The bond interest rate is assumed to be 9.5 percent and the reinvestment interest rate is also placed at 9.5 percent, thereby not taking credit for arbitrage during construction. The financing date is October 1984 and the construction, shakedown, and testing period is two years. The underwrit- ing costs are four percent of the bond issue, a working capital fund of the first four months debt service is estab- lished, and the pay back period for the debt service is 15 years. The debt service schedule is structured to be non- linear so that the annual payments increase with time. This is to allow future year's escalated revenues to cover a greater share of the debt than the early year's revenues. The debt service schedule starts in the first year with pay- ment of interest only and the total debt service increases with the following years until the entire debt is retired in the fifteenth year. *Based on discussion with Borough project Officer. 8-4 m l® i i . r-} i10 f7, f i tl •. oil Table 6-2 Operating Costs for Alternatives Investigates (thousands of dollars) Item oil Table 6-2 Operating Costs for Alternatives Investigates (thousands of dollars) Item Kalifonsky Beach Electric Generation Nikishka Industries Cogeneration Kalifonsky Beach Cogeneration Nigh School Cogeneration 1. Personnel 496 496 496 496 2. Utilities and 137 160. 137 137 Supplies 3. Maintenance 199 240 279 267 4. Landfill 119 119 119 119 Subtotal 951 10,023 1,031 11,019 6. Miscsellaneous and 143 153 155 153 Contingency @ 15% TOTAL 1,094 1,176 1,186 1,172 El 8.4 We Cycle Costs The bond issue size and the debt service schedule for each of the lour facility alternatives is presented in Tables 8-3, 8-8, 8-7, and 8-9, and their complete life cycle costs are shown in Tables 8-4, 8-6, 8-8, and 8-10. The fol- lowing is a description of selected line items in the life cycle cost tables: 10 evenues$ cost inputs for each of the rev - onus sources, except septage, are shown in Table 6-2 and the escalation rates are describ- ed in Section 2.8. The amount of revenues re- ceived for septage disposal is determined by receiving credit equal to the estimated dispos- al fees charged private contractors in any i given year. it should be noted that the Borough may be required by the grant funding agency to charge only its operating and capi- tal amortization costs for septage disposal which is less than the fees charged by private ; contractors. However, full private contractor revenue credit is given to the project, be- cause the project receives this full credit either in real revenues, in cost savings to the public, or a combination of both. The current disposal charge for septage and its as- sumed escalation rate is found in Section 4.2. 2, Inenses: cost inputs for each item are shown on Table 8-2. All line items escalate { with inflation except for the utilities cost i which escalates the same as electric revenues and the landfill cost which escalates in accor- dance with,Section 4.1. 3. et Disposal Co t: equal to the total annu- a expenses minus the total annual revenues. 4. Jet_ -Cost perTon of MSW: equal to the net disposal cost d v ed ­­byhe tons of NOW incin- erated per year. S. Cost of Disposal with Current Practice: cur- rent practice disposal costs and escalation rates are presented in Section 4. 8-6 Table 0-3 15 Year Debt Service Program Site$ Kalifonsky Beach Energy: Electricity INPUTS W/0 GRANT W/ GRANT COMBUSTION FACILITY 8774 3510 SEPTAGE EQUIP. 1165 146 PIPELINE 0 0 BBC. CONSTRUCTION COST ($ 000) 3981 COSST. PERIOD (YEARS) 2 WORKING CAPITAL ($ 000) 390 UNDERWRITING COSTS (0) 4 BOND RATE (0) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING CONS.(%) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING 0PER.(1) 9.5 CALCULATIONS s8sUE SIZE ($ 000) $003 RESERVE FUND t$ 000) 0 NET ISSUE SIZE ($ 000) 5003 LEVEL DEBT SERVICE ($ 000) 639 DEBT SERVICE MIN. ($ 000) 475 INCREASE IN DS EACH YEAR ($ 000) 31 DEBT SERVICE LEVEL NON -LEVEL DEBT DEBT INTEREST PRINC. PRINC. YEAR SERVICE SERVICE INCURRED PAYED REMIAN 1 639 475 475 0 $003 2 639 506 475 31 4972 3 639 536 472 64 4908 4 639 567 4�66 101 4807 5 639 598 457 141 4666 6 639 628 443 185 4482 7 639 659 426 233 4249 8 639 609 404 286 3963 9 639 720 376 343 3619 10 639 750 344 407 3213 11 639 701 305 476 2737 12 639 012 260 552 2185 13 639 942 200 635 1551 14 639 873 147 726 825 15 639 903 78 825 0 8-7 . _ . !• sass ,.a_: _ sass. �. '. •. .. _ ._ _ Table ®-4 Financial Projections for Kenai Ponineula Resource Recovery Project Sites Kalifonsky Boach Energyt Bl©ctricity YOAA I1$ 1107 loss 1009 1o". 1001 10021.1 tots 1004 loos 1t" 1. MM70 QUAWIIY ,,thousandsof ton. M WO 2107 11.0 12.1 1204 32.4 12.6 12.• 220o 1206 1200 2. 0it1A05 gUANI1Y 1,thousands ofgatiensl 1400 1410 1420 1420 1440 1450 1460 1456 idle 14" to 1115"1 ROOMED f Mot Water co/ikons of Slut 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14=101tyy $millions or sub) 1/.27 11.24 11.4t 11.42 Igloo licit 11.00 lie" Igloo it.so Steam Imillions of that 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (° 4. 00v/Mu00 Mot water 621 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 0 0 Electricity 411 100700 552024 400402 $70674 725540 004440 •702" 050402 1044459 1111677 Was 121 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0epte0a 141 102719 113014 126014 117224 150621 145117 1001" 100412 214000 213159 WIAL 503627 445007 724410 6070" 004170 071004 1050462 1154014 1240740 1372030 So EKrm" personnel is$ 477010 420710 674012 722170 772730 824021 ••NH 044420 1.12002 1002704 Utilities 111 1002111 211000 222451 . 252502 274415 201202 220400 157/65 qq Maintenance lot 271104 211074 270700 U0745 210027 211720 $54050 270700 n§312 13/94, Landfill oil 102044 10001/ 217214 2164117 257272 270171 202046 220209 152305 209400 Incremental transportation 16071 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Miscellaneous and contingency is) 105454 101457 04110 200206 222701 210270 255044 272010 202022 212445 SUNOFAL isi05d0 147741t i5o0200 t7102s0 102t227 1t77001 2125144 22.5s1• 2452704 20g4070 Debt service I01 475252 505124 514494 544000 $07000 420142 05s744 ist127 71o000 750491 101AL 1001792 1902454 2126724 2277270 2494000 2404054 2702011 29730#2 J172402 2207244 4. MC,t 010Y00A6 COST 1400264 1317646 1302100 1409470 Io50gs 1424060 1724440 1010o20 191408 Mull 7. MCY CON M "a 11010 44017 41.20 41.27 411.t5 47.57 U." $2.67 soon soon "a" 0o COST OF 0/4Y00AL US" CUA•EMY Y•ACIICE Cost per ton of No /01 40.11 41.I9 *,$1 00.41 54044 stood No70 do," 74017 00.22 s Cat ppeer tusand gollec.hoof .eptago 6100 74.10 $00" 00.04 00.04 104040 9141" 124.27 125046 147.45 too.t4 j • ►opulation projection (Figure 2-21 Indicates level population after 10021 it is reacemanded that the need for additional plant capacity be evaluated prior to tout • toms. i s f ij tj ail t , r i Table 8-4 (aoneiaded) Von fit 1007 logo logo 2000 200t 2002 2002 2004 2005 2006 1. MASID QUANTITY (Thousands of tons 116111 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.0 22.1 22.1 22.1 2. 85MAGI gUAR71TR , t0housands Of Mellon► 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 2. MM/ROY fA000C6D Not water (Millions of out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Riecticity (Millions of Rwhl Otero WMAns of lbs) 11.46 0 HAS ll.bb 11.64 11.66 11.66 11.66 11.66 11.66 It. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. RRVIOUN not water 421 Rtootriotty 121 0 1241151 0 1252162 0 1474620 0 1607136 0 1761906 0 1909676 0 2011946 0 3261116 0 2473085 0 2605663 Mom 21 4i41 254260 277252 202205 220404 250050 201264 4265N 4g10 0Sep 5oo12 552441TOTAL 146510 1630115 1776025 1026739 2111046 201040 25o6124 2113066 2910914. 2241106 0 Personnel (51 1 Utilities (21 11596" 462575 1240836 505297 1227694 560774 1420622 600141 1920077 $54174 1626481 1740136 1162/60 10g2532 2L21g07 %0 Maintenance (51 465207 4*7170 522464 560072 600170 712260 $52561 777462 49/240 $47424 747117 021702 700415 lo06136 855274 6andfill too InoreMantat transpertation 65.71 410020 0 442002 0 470107 0 517652 0 $59064 602760 652002 7042" 76o601 121449 Miscaitaneous and 0 0 0 0 0 q contMOenev (51 wMWA` 224227 2013761 257741 2049612 202712 1273242 409571 5518170 430241 2761621 469925 4069026 $01750 436o011 526971 460704t 576454 614646 Dsht service (01 711072 011655 042227 172019 001401 0 0 0 5060612 0 6430311 0 MM 3614640 3197167 4115470 43000" 005024 4065026 42H011 46N142 5050613 941011, 6, MN DISPOW COM 2110222 2227052 2230654 2494297 2572111 1762984 1101747 1062077 2070749 2182205 7. on CM P1111 i0M M1M M111. $7,00 71.20 74,02 76.46 $2.70 50.76 60.01 42.11 46.52 Is COPS 0/ 0I/90010 MMM CUNNEW PRAMICR cost per ton of no NI Cost ppa1r thousand 06.76 02.66 101.11 109.27 111.02 127.46 127.49 141.67 160.66 172.40 valises Of esptpe (l01 i75.42 101.21 200.42 227.17 247.62 260.01 204.20 220.61 240.54 201.00 FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 6-4 (1) Pull operations begin October 19861 all costs are escalated to April of the year listed which is six months from the anniversary date of the facility. (2) Escalated at 13 percent per yes; to July 1, 1996, 15 Percent per year to July 1, 1988, and 9 percent per year thereaf ter . �3) Escalated at 10 percent per year to July 1, 1986s, 12 percent per year to July 1, 1988, and. 9 percent per year thereafter. (4) Calculation: cost of disposal, with current practice times annual septage quantity. 15) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 7 Percent per year thereafter. includes a 15 percent contingency for contract operation in the first year of operation. (6) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated 8 percent per year there- after. (7) Assumes a cost of $5000 per month for transportation to North Road in 1984 dollars. (8) Values from previous tablet receipt of federal and state grant funds is assumed for portions of the capi- tal cost as described in Secrion 9.3. (9) Escalated from 25.20 at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1996, raised 30 percent, and escalated at 8 percent per year thereafter. (10) Escalated from 060 per thousand gallons at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 9 percent per year there- after. 8-10 M r) M a 'r: 'mill Table 6-5 mlffimm�ftym MR 15 Year Debt Service Program i Site$ Nikishka Industries Energy: Cogeneration INPUTS W/0 GRANT W/ GRANT COMBUSTION FACILITY . 9098 3639 � BEPTAGE EQUIP. 1208 151 i PIPELINE61 152 . ESC. CONSTRUCTION COST ($ 000) 4194 COSST. PERIOD (YEARS) 2 WORKING CAPITAL ($ 000) 428 UNDERWRITING COSTS (4) 4 BOND RATE (0) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING CONS.(%) 9.5 ` EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING OPER.(%) 9.5 ' CALCULATIONS ISSUE OHS ($ 000) 5298 RESERVE FUND ($ 000) 0 NET ISSUE SIZE ($ 000) 5298 " LEVEL DEBT SERVICE ($ 000) 677 DEBT SERVICE MZN. ($ 000) 503 ' INCREASE IN DO EACH YEAR ($ 000) 32 r DEBT SERVICE LEVEL NON -LEVEL DEBT DEBT INTEREST PRINC. PRINC. YEAR SERVICE SERVICE INCURRED PAYED REMIAN I•,r,►******�**�,►,r**,t,►,r**,r*+r*,t,t****+t,r,t,r,►�,r*+r�***,►*,►***r,r,►*,ta,►,t*,►** _.. _ 1 677 503 503 0 5298 ' 2 677 536 503 32 5266 3 677 560 500 68 $198 4 677 601 494 107 5091 5 6 677 633 404 149 4942 677 665 469 195 4746 ' 7 677 69S 451 247 4500 ` 9 677 730 427 303 4197 677 762 399 364 3033 --- " 10 11 677 795 364 677 927 323 431 504 3403 2099 12 13 677 860 275 677 092 220 584 672 2314 1642 14 677 924 156 769 874 1S 677 957 83 874 0 I- N1 � 8-11 I R - .- Table 6-6 Financial Projections for Kenai Peninsula Resource Recovery Project site$ Nikishka Industries Energy: Cogeneration YBAR 11) 1097 loss lost 1990 1991 10921*1 1993 1996 1995 It" ," 1. NA6TB pUANTtTY 1Thousands of tons NON? 71.7 31.9 32.1 32.6 32.6 12.0 3206 I2.9 32.8 32.8 2. eBPTAOE puANT$Tr (1housands of gal/onal 1400 1/10 1420 1130 1160 1450 1650 1650 1650 1650 f. BNBROY PRODUCBD not voter Imillions of B'ro$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biect:oity Imilitons of Rwhl 7.59 7.63 7.66 7.75 7.80 7.06 7.16 7.84 7.66 7.s0 steam Imllt/one of lbsl 121.6 122 12f 124 125 126 126 12g 126 126 4. R/,VENU69 79 Not water 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blactrialty Ill 439070 49061 546477 $01227 69130 121136 706219 050158 036963 1020766 eto" 121 septage 111 407116 103739 96371S 113904 610000 125016 $67110 117226 711569 160621 773516 169317 627727 it01lb 005671 196611 967676 214090 1011013 21335S O0 TOTAL 1020925 1172163 1269490 1405191 1621572 1662039 1706150 1041269 2090210 2260137 1 ~ 5. BRP6N660 hJ personnel 451 Utilities /11 677939 232116 630776 259970 671912 205297 722176 310076 772720 331061 026621 360466 004600 402720 06662s 631969 1012s92 671671 lOs3706 Maintenance 151 320019 305215 126500 319441 373l02 400079 426010 691066 690100 521036 624616 Landfill 161 193666 l000ll 217316 236697 257272 279671 $02065 326200 352109 360600 Incremental transportation 0,71 Miscellaneous and 62009 76306 016415 17360 03175 100019 107020 11011 i22527 1f1106 contingency 151 SUBTOTAL 200122 2 7110s7 191575 166 200199 222769 216362 259040 272001 202006 312666 231115 Debt service IS) 6 2 203331 535722 179fol6 566111 1l2of70 600600 MOOS $12009 2211101 665270 2297465 607660 2576762 730097 2766749 762666 2975656 79/s15 TOTAL 2216420 2202474 2362107 2529670 2707593 2696360 2096122 2100411 2531196 3770460 6. NOT DISMAL COST 1116101 1030012 1073617 1123917 1179020 1236361 1208082 '1365969 1632946 1502251 7. NET CON PER TON NOW 37.43 32.29 23.41 26.69 36.17 37.62 29.60 61.62 63.69 /9.10 6. COST OF DISPOSAL WITH 01111017 PSACTtCB Cost per ton of M5N l!1 10.10 43.39 4111.07 60.61 $6.66 69.06 4111.76 66.06 76.37 00.22 Cost Per thousand gallons of septage I101 71o10 60.77 00.04 99.96 106.60 116.01 126.27 139.46 141.69 160.96 Population projection (Figure 2-21 indicates level population after 19921 it is I 1 I recommended that the need for additional plant capacity be evaluated prior to that time. �i I i Table 8-6 (concluded) r i ' WAR Ill lof7 lots logo 2000 2001 3002 2003 2004 2009 2006 1. NAOTN OUANTIff (Thousands of tons oil) 32.1 13.6 32.1 32.0 3209 12.1 33.9 3200 32./ 2. 111"A0N QUANTtTy 32.1 IThousanis of gallonal 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1490 100 1150 3. 1N1N V /N000C10 1450 1450 Not rater Imilllong of Imp 0 0 0 0 •leatlattyy 1�ltilono of Nvhl steam INII/Ana of lbsl 7.64 13s 7.01 7.94 7.04 d 0 7.s1 0 7.11 7.s� 7.s� 7.01 7.1� l3i l]i 12i 12f 12f US . 136 136 1. 119/NON Not water /21 11e0trlalty 111 steam 131 1113639 1001094 1312772 1160911 1331922 12/22tO 1440195 1570979 1711937 1166000 2033940 2316990 2416925 /eptage 111 TOOfAL 251160 377252 10J30S 1329164 139101 1422206 159051 1531760 3f1364 162070f 17123i1 1/f1]JJ i9f17t7 'r 21519so 265096s 2666336 3090463 3361631 2f25062 426517 3020171 464900 /2/111/ 50is26 /5/10/5 592113 /lf3/sS 5. 11gM!// personnel Utilities I31 I51 ilSfffO 5i1173 1210/1i 619634 1337694 675401 1130633 736167 1520077 1626/s3 1740316 1"2160 1902511 2131", ao• (SO Landfillof 5611]i 613 002111 21 07 707000 53301 0/209/ 1019100 901015 1112716 1231660I 110re1enlttfns/ettetlon 45,71 410029 140301 00 150101 470307 160600 $17692 171051 $5006/ 161110 $03799 052002 704340 96111/ 760401 1031401 021119w NlsoellanGous 04 196752 210525 2292i1 211030 211902 aontMOony fbl /USTOTAG debt O. 1•► 337710 310110% 2/3750 3437537 109553 3694995 130319 3971946 161095 /2690/2 $01717 4590413 53613/ 4035373 $71116 611615 697649 TWu 027221 /59611 592002 924391 956710 0 0 530633t 0 $705601 i11S253 f. Nt? lAST 4035409 4207149 1519007 4006336 5226662 15f011J 4935273 9306231 0 9705f01 0 ii3S2S1 1973419 1646101 1720660 179f171 1874031 065362 1011103 10661H 1117956 1171SGS Con pan 7. Nf/t CO/T 111 TON N/M 47.97 90.19 $2.46 54.78 97.16 29.13 10.f1 12.i7 11.07 15.73 0. COST 01 01/101AL WIN CUNN/NT /NACTiC1 C ii per thousanA Ifl 16.75 93.f/ 101.11 lo9.J7 116.02 127.46 137.65 149.47 lio.S6 173./0 gallons of saOWgo flop 175.42 191.21 201.12 227.17 317.62 2i9.91 29/.30 320.61 319.51 ' 311.00 1� FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 8-6 (1) Full operations begin October 1996, all costs are escalated to April of the year listed which is six months from the anniversary date of the facility. (2) Escalated at 13 percent per year to July 10 1986, 15 percent per year to July 11 1988, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (3) Escalated at 10 percent per year to July 11 1986, 12 percent per year to July 1, 1988, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (4) Calculations cost of disposal with current practice times annual septage quantity. (5) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 7 percent per year thereafter. Includes a 15 percent contingency for contract operation in the first year of operation. (6) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated 8 percent per year there- after. (7) Assumes a cost of $5,000 per month for transportation to North Road in 1984 dollars. (8) Values from previous tablet receipt of federal and state grant funds is assumed for portions of the capi- tal cost as described in Secrion 0.3. (9) Escalated from 25.20 at 5 percent per year to July 1, ' 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated at 8 percent per year thereafter. ' (10) Escalated from 060 per thousand gallons at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 9 percent per year there- after. 8-14 10 Table 8-7 I 15 Year Debt Service Program Sites Kalifoneky Beach Energyi Cogeneration l INPUTS W/O GRANT W/ GRANT COMBUSTION FACILITY 10296 4118 j SEPTAGE EOUIP. 1367 171 PIPELINE 3917 1567 BBC, CONSTRUCTION COST ($ 000) 6378 COSST. PERIOD (YEARS) 2 WORKING CAPITAL ($ 000) 411 UNDERWRITSNG COSTS (1) 4 BOND RATE (0) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING CONSA U 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING OPERAS) 9.5 ' CALCULATIONS , ISSUE SIZE ($ 000) 7617 RESERVE FUND ($ 000) 0 ' NET SSSUE ME ($ 000) 7817 LEVEL DEBT SERVICE ($ 000) 999 DEBT SERVICE MIN. ($ 000) 743 INCREASE IN D8 EACH YEAR ($ 000) 48 DEBT SERVICE LEVEL NON -LEVEL DEBT DEBT INTEREST PRINC. PRINC. YEAR SERVICE SERVICE INCURRED PAYED REMIAN **AA*N****A****1�A**A*��A��***�**�*•tYA*****AA*M*A*�***t1****A*AA* 1 999 743 743 0. 7017 2 999 790 743 46 7769 3 999 838 739 100 7669 4 999 986 729 157 7512 5 999 934 714 220 7292 6 999 902 693 289 7003 7 999 1029 665 364 6639 8 999 1077 631 446 6192 9 999 1125 590 537 5656 10 999 1173 537 635 5020 11 999 1220 477 744 4277 12 999 1268 406 062 3415 13 999 1316 324 992 2423 14 999 1364 230 1134 1269 15 i 999 1412 122 1289 0 8-15 v Table 8-8 Financial Projections for Kenai Peninsula Resource Recovery Project Sites Kalifonsky Beach Knergyl Cogeneration WAR 411 1997 loss lost logo MI, 1992400 1093 1994 loss loss 1. NASM OUAN?ITY 11housande of tons NoW 31.7 31.9 32.1 32.4 32.6 3P.0 32.0 . 32.0 23.1 32.0 2. ERPTAOE QUANTITY 17housands of gallons) 1400 1410 1430 1430 1440 1450 1450 1450 1450 1490 1. ENERGY PRODUCED Not water (millions of ETUI 61110o0 4942E 69061 70513 70949 71314 71304 71396 71304 71394 Nlacticlty 4e1111ons of Kwh) 10.30 10.45 10.61 10.61 10.67 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 Steam Imilitons of shot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. IIRV9NUL9 Not water 131 176260 201077 22361E 241600 260001 279916 299910 320476 362000 365913 Electricity 131 450663 507027 560906 617101 676793 743230 100030 111143 s61209 104771E Etsaw It 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eeptags 441 161739 113064 125014 137224 150621 165317 100195 106413 214090 233350 TOTAL 730661 026717 900536 995034 1007432 1t07462 1200729 1300731 1616202 1#47#01 4rf . 1 S. 4:KOENE99 personnel ls# 677939 1130779 674932 722170 772736 026121 004690 . 046621 1012893 1013704 Utilities 131 10920S 211999 232633 293592 27641S 301202 320400 357965 300102 425300 Nainte ante 15) 301341 154013 370650 406226 434461 4650117 407641 63247E 9697S3 009434 Landfill 461 113166 stools, 217246 236657 267272 279671 302049 326200 SS2206 300400 Inorsesntat trampartatlon 15071 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 miscellaneous and contingency too 211056 10711E 210916 226611 241470 250392 274460 295021 316520 330606 SUNDIAL 16442s6 1594619 171S497 1144333 1902SS6 2131253 2289264 2459101 2641650 2#17902 Debt service 101 742615 790403 030100 015979 931762 901549 102032S 1077122 1924900 1172695 TOTAL 23116903 2305021 25S1696 2730307 29163/11 3112802 3318590 2536222 3766S67 4010997, 6. NLT 039f09AL COST t6S6240 1SS0233 1644148 1734474 1826896 1029140 30291163 2117491 2341360 2362609 7. NDf CON MR TON NW � 92.25 49.00 $1.22 63.52 16.10 59.70 il.st 65.17 fo.55 72.03 s. COs? Of 019POSAL WITH CURRENT PRACTICE Cost per ton of 01910 lot 40.16 43.30 46.67 50.61 64.66 59.04 63.74 60.06 74.37 00.32 Cost per thousand gallons of septage 1101 74.10 00.77 69.04 05.96 104.40 114.01 124.27 136.46 147.6E 160.94 Population projection 1ligure 2-21 indicates level population after 19021 it is recommended that the need for additional plant capacity be evaluated prior to that ties. 0>Nliif tirrimti�wi�eq�len Table 8-8 (concludo8) `F i TIAI Ill 1907 lots logo 2000 2001 2002 2001 2004 2005 2006 1. NAST/ OUANTITT I7houmands of tons Novi 12.0 3209 12.1 12.8 12.1 12.1 1200 1208 3201 $2.0 2. SIMON QUANTITY 17housands of gallons$ 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1. INIAOT tNODUCID Not water hdllions of /7U1 71114 71114 71114 71104 71114 71164 71264 71164 71114 71104 Ilacticity (millions of Kehl 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 10.74 i /teal lollllons of Ibs$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. IIVIMYI/ not water 121 102496 420079 449414 410947 $14614 550617 500101 410424 674614 721172 i Ileotrieity 411 1142011 1244704 1356625 1470030 1612044 1767128 9919349 2017646 2275912 2400129 sate" 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6eptate 441 254100 277292 102205 129404 $50050 191164 426967 464960 906621 592441 - TOTAL 1786969 1042134 3109914 2289200 2415701 2699129 2931039 3103049 1456013 3754545 5. IN9"/Io poreonnet 15) 125g660 1240616 1327694 1420611 1520077 1626493 1740116 1162160 1192411 2111987 UIlitiss I11 461579 505297 550774 $00141 694174 711269 777462 047424 921701 1000036 Naintaeenos (41 $52100 497070 746020 709106 $55041 914096 071019 1047466 1120710 1190243 i Landfill 161 410929 442/02 479107 $17652 $90064 601789 652092 704260 760601 021440 v Incremental transportation 45*71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nimoallansous and oontinngqenoy (91 162194 297761 414904 441049 475024 906276 $41059 911929 $22660 606246 sOITOTAL 3041066 1275667 1510500 $701612 4061903 4346712 4603609 5043243 5430363 5016740 Debt serving (o1 1220482 1261261 1316055 1363642 1411621 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 4260341 4543036 4835561 9945524 $476211 4306712 4693615 $043243 5420262 5024760 ` S. N97 DISMAL con 2410370 2601111 2727049 2156211 2910904 16679/1 1761647 11601#6 1961146 2071215 7. N►1► CM 9/N 70N NON 75.62 79.12 01.14 67.08 01.14 50.14 91.71 46.71 59.06 61.15 0. CUT 0/ OI//0/AL N/TN CUNNIN7 9AACWCI Cost per ton of my 0) 06.79 91.61 101.18 100.27 116.02 127.46 117.69 141.67 160.46 171.40 Cost per thousand } I gallons of septage 4101 175.42 191.21 209.42 227.17 267.62 260.91 204.20 $20.60 149.44 101.00 " i i 1 i FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 8-8 (1) Full operations begin October 19861 all costs are escalated to April of the year listed which is six months from the anniversary date of the facility. (2) Escalated at 13 percent per year to July 11 1986, 15 Percent per year to July 1, 1900, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (3) Escalated at 10 percent per year to July 1, 1986, 12 Percent per year to July 1, 1988, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (4) Calculations cost of disposal with current practice times•annual septage quantity. (5) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 7 Percent per year thereafter. Includes •a 15 percent contingency for contract operation in the first year of operation. (6) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated 8 percent per year there- after. (7) Assumes a cost of $5400 per month for transportation to North Road in 1904 dollars. (8) Values from previous table] receipt of federal and state grant funds is assumed for portions of the capi- tal cost as described in Secrion 9.3. (9) Escalated from 25.20 at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1906, raised 30 percent, and escalated at 8 percent per year thereafter. (10) Escalated from $60 per thousand gallons at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1906 and 9 percent per year there- after. dD 6-18 aP+ r) J Y • Table 8-9 15 Year Dobt Service Program Sites High School Energy: Cogeneration INPUTS W/O GRANT W/ GRANT COMBUSTION FACILITY 10495 4198 SEPTAGE EQUIP. 1394 174 PIPELINE 1854 742 EBC, CONSTRUCTION COST (0 000) 5570 CONST. PERIOD ,(YEARS) 2 WORKING CAPITAL 0 000) 406 UNDERWRITING COSTS (0) 4 BOND RATE (1) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING CONS.(*) 9.5 EARNED INTEREST RATE DURING OPER. I) 9.5 CALCULATIONS I88UE SIZE (0 000) 6873 t RESERVE FUND (0 000) 0 ` NET ISSUE SIZE 0 000) 6873 LEVEL DEBT SERVICE 0 000) 878 DEBT SERVICE MIN, 0 000) 653 INCREASE IN DO EACH YEAR (0 000) 42 I DEBT SERVICE LEVEL NON -LEVEL DEBT DEBT INTEREST PRINC. PRINC, YEAR SERVICE SERVICE INCURRED PAYED REMIAN AAAAAA�****��1�**�***AAAAA�r**AAAAA**AAA*AAAAAAAAA*AAAAA***AAAAA +� 1 878 653 653 0 6873 2 878 695 653 42 6931 3 878 737 649 Be 6743 4 878 779 641 138 6605 5 878 821 627 194 6411 6 878 $63 609 254 6157 7 878 905 585 320 5637 8 878 947 555 393 5445 9 878 989 517 472 4973 10 878 1031 472 559 4414 11 878 1073 419 654 3760 12 878 1115 357 751 3002 13 876 1157 205 872 2130 V 14 678 •1199 202 997 1134 15 878 1241 108 1134 0 6-19 iw r Table s-10 Financial Projections for Kenai Peninsula Resource Recovery Project Site$ High School Energy$ Cogeneration YBAN Ill 1917 1988 1919 logo 1991 1993401 1993 1994 it" lots 1• NAB?! QUANTITY r (Thousands of tons Now) 31.7 31.9 32.1 12.6 33.6 33•10 33.1 33.8 3200 32.8 2. 88"A08 OUAN11TV IThouaands of gallons! 1400 1410 1620 1630 1610 1150 1660 1650 1650 1650 3. ENIAOY PRODUCED not water (millions of BTuI $1640 52010 59310 59935 60305 $0675 60675 60675 60675 60675 8lect1ctt (millions of Nwhl 10.75 10.62 10.69 10.92 11.06 11.12 11.12 11.13 11 .13 11.12 steam (millions of Mal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6, UVE1111E8 Not water (2) 169030 171310 190075 205281 221007 237931 294591 272406 291672 311175 Eleutrlalty 431 667327 626708 581646 630930 701011 760675 030966 011651 996751 1086159 Be an 421 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 septa9e 161 103739 113116 125014 137226 190621 165317 100195 196413 2160" 233361 WVAL 720816 013073 896735 912426 1073166 1173930 1273724 1303367 1503313 1631692 !V ENpt;N869 personnel 15) Utilities 431 $77039 119215 630178 211099 676933 232693 723170 253592 772730 276415 924621 301292 $14099 321601 966628 357965 1012092 300182 3013796 635290 Maintenance 1s) Landfill 46) 361930 113066 130552 199911 362320 317346 318753 336667 .415966 257272 616083 270671 676339 303069 509576 326309 565246 362305 513411 380400 incremental transportation (5,71 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 " N/sceltensous and < contingency Is) 200122 194575 208195 332760 231262 255068 373901 303004 312111 236315 BUNWAL Debt servlaa 19t 1#25151 653967 1976014 694909 1696667 737002 1923940 770020 1960745 821031 2107016 0630% 2264292 005076 2432381 967092 2613069 980109 2007311 1021127 i TOTAL 2271111' 3271799 3433449 2002069 2701703 2078971 3169366 3379173 3602170 3130439 6. NU DIBr08AL 0081 1967231 1157177 1536716 1620543 1701131 1701052 1605662 1096209 2099169 22067#6 7. N1T COST rltl TOM Nsw 19.12 65.70 67.67 90.02 $2.60 94.12 $7.TO 60.E 64.02 i7.2s I. CUT Or D/Br08AL WITH CURNOW r1ACTICB Cost per can of Now 191 40.18 $2.39 66.67 50.61 56.66 59.06 N•76 68•s6 76.37 1042 Cost ppssr thousand F" gallons of septage 4101 74.10 80.77 68.06 95.96 101.60 116.01 321.27 135.66 167.65 160.96 i • reputation projection Iriqure 2-21 Indicates level population after 19921 it is I k fI II rscownded that the need for additional plant capacity be evaluated prior to that, Uses f ■ --mid.- - } - R Table 8-10 (concluded) F i MEAN 111 1007 logo logo 3000 2001 2002 7001 2004 3005 2006 1. NAST1 QUANTITY 11h0084nds of tons N/NI 1301 1201 22.0 lafl 12.1 12.8 fait fa.1 fa.1 fs.# of #EPTAO/ QUANTITY fThouaande of gallons) 1490 1450 1450 1450 1450 1490 1450 .1400 1450 1490 1. SNEROY PNODUC/D Hoe veto@ !d tllona of iTUI Eleetiettyr Imlttions of Ruh) 60476 lifts 60675 11.12 60475 Lifia $0679 11.12 60674 lifts 60675 lifts 60619 11.12 $0675 $0679 ,. steam Imltllans of that o 0 0 0 0 0 Lifts 11614 0 0 0 0 40 NEVIMUE/ . r Not water 131 111 113707 1104140 157066 ta901aa 302061 1406996 400005 15if6s6 417421 167165a 460041 10aa101 500/04 1916090 915160 s164011 573370 613506 steamI2ity steam 1?1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s159671 a57a044 septa a 141 254360 377292 30230S 129404 359090 191364 416507 4649/0 0 Sofia# 0 692441 TOTAL 1772107 1925140 3091362 2271134 2440121 2611506 3013490 716E#71 3439971 1717903 ,. 5. /SPSNSE6 Personnel 01 utliletea 111 1150660 46f579 1240034 $05a97 1237694 550774 1420411 600141 15a0077. 654f74 1620413 711a66 1740f16 777463 106a160 i99aSlt sift967 ao Natntenanee !91 Landfill 1#1 674252 467950 711706 761716 011247 075946 936914 647434 1002411 923701 1072563 lo0f01$ 1147662 1 incremental tranapertstlon 49#71 410939 0 441001 0 479307 0 517652 0 999064 0 $01709 652092 704a60 7fo60t 1a14N N Nisoallansous and 0 0 0 0 0 p' oontingeney 451 /ervice 157719 1076114 312751 1240644 409951 3402033 430219 3741914 46/195 4020671 501717 4120101 530011 4641541 97441f 4900#02 #1463S 64761f Debt service t11 101. 3145 1115163 Ils7lol lt9#190 124121f 0 0 0 0364021 0 $76560; 0 "FAb 4019279 4359106 4619211 4040782 5261194 412o#o1 4$419#1 4990612 11#4021 47i95f) 6. N6? MGM" can 3114072 2490666 2547052 2660940 2701771 1619291 1730062 1035005 1924150 2027991 7. NET on PS# TDN Now 70.64 74.11 77.61 0t.f7 15.11 49.00 52.79 95o44 Sloss $Lois 1. COST OF 01/PO/Ab NITS CUNRM PRACfICS Cost per ton of No It) Cost per thousand 06.75 93.60 101.11 109f27 119.02 127.46 137.69 141*67 160.5f 173f40 i gallon@ of septaga flop 175.42 191.21. 300.42 227.17 247f42 269.91 a94.ao 110041 140.44 711.00 1 I ` I l' r 1 . I.� r. FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 8-10 C1) Hull operations begin October 19861 all costs are escalated to April of the year listed which is six months from the anniversary date of the facility. (2) Escalated at 13 percent per year to -July 1, 1986, 15 percent per year to July 1, 1988, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (3) Escalated at 10 percent per year to July 1, 1986, 12 percent per year to July 1, 1988, and 9 percent per year thereafter. (4) Calculations cost of disposal with current practice times annual septage quantity. (5) Escalated at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1966 and 7 percent per year thereafter. Includes a 15 percent contingency for contract operation in the first year of operation. (6) Escalated at S percent per year to July 11 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated 8 percent per year there- after. (7) Assumes a cost of $5,000 per month for transportation to North Road in 1984 dollars. (8) Values from previous tablet receipt of federal and state grant funds is assumed for portions of the capi- tal cost as described in Secrion 8.3. (9) Escalated from 25.20 at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986, raised 30 percent, and escalated at 8 percent per year thereaf ter . (10) Escalated from $60 per thousand gallons at 5 percent per year to July 1, 1986 and 9 percent per year there- after. 8-22 (_, REFERENCES i I. "Kenai. Peninsula Borough Solid Waste Management Plan", i Trans -Alaska Engineering, Seward, Alaska and URS Com- pany, Anchorage, Alaska, September 261 1980. 2. "Coincineration on the Kenai Peninsula", Trans -Alaska Engineering, Seward, Alaska, October 29, 1900. 3. "Detailed feasibility Report for the Central Massachu- setts Resource Recovery Project", the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts, May 1980. 4. 1982 Special Census, State of Alaska Department of Labor, Box 1149, Juneau, Alaska 99011, S. "Preliminary Draftj Handbook for the Design and Implemen- tation of Septage Disposal Alternatives" prepared for the U.B. EPA Office of Research and Development by a Stearns and Wheler Engineers z Scientists (Contract No. 68-03-2971), April 1982, 6o, Eikum, A.S.1 "Treatment of Septage -- European Practice" prepared for the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Develop - went, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (Contract No. 68-03-2971). 7. Bowker, R.P.G. and Hathaway, S.W.t "Alternatives for the Treatment and Disposal of Residuals from on -site Waste- water Systems", U.S. EPA Training Seminar or. Wastewater Alternatives for Small Communities, August 1978. 8. "Septage Disposal for the Kenai-Soldotna Area", CH2M Hill, Anchorage, Alaska, August 1979. 9. "Geotechnioal Report, Kalifonsky Beach Elementary School, Soldotna, Alaska", Frank Moolin i Assoc. Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, November 1982. R-1 .f }t I = F A r07.7 � "111 APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Puriposs The purpose of this section is to test the sensitivity of solid waste transportation or haul costs to variations in facility location. Specifically, the objectives are# 1) to determine the location of the "least cost" site and its prbx- imity to the Kalifonsky Beach Road site] and 2) to determine the additional cost of hauling NOW to the North Kenai indus- trial site. Met o NOW is deposited by residents in several regional storage boxes and these boxes are hauled individually to the facility for disposal. The schematic maps in Figure A-1 present the road segments, their lengths, and the average number of boxes hauled per month in 1903. Table A-1 pre- sents information on run length, haul time, and boxes hauled. The product of distance times the number of boxes moved from each transfer site is equivalent to the cost of trans- port. By inspection of 'Figure A-1, the least cost point must be somewhere along the circle of roads connecting the following mods pointss the "Y" in Soldotna, the intersec- tion of Kalifonsky Beach Road and the Sterling Highway, and the intersection of Beaver Loop Road and the Kenai Spur Road (near Kenai). This loop consists of two portions, segment F and Segments M + E). Each was analysed separately to deter- mine the "least cost" location. The least cost point between any two modes occurs when the product of distance and the number of boxes associated with each point are equal. For example, if the least cost point were on the Kenai Spur Road, X miles from the "Y" in Ooldotona, setting the product of X times the number of boxes reaching the "Y should be equal to (10.6 - X) times the number of boxes reaching the intersection of the Kenai Spur Road and Beaver Loop Road (in Kenai). For Segment F, the equation for the least cost point would bet A-3 i swim N1111 ti Nikishka industries ... 46 r fy y Sterling' Box �oqe, Kenai Landfill 39 . _ 0 27 j Q Kenai �(0 l 2•8 y 1 A Beaver Loop SpDr x�G•6 1 Intersection K ghw4rItyll _... E Soldotna S.9 w 1.6 k4j�PonBk "" Q Qlto4 s' 8e40h 2.2 Funny. I River 21 C N .9 Road J . Box Robineon's ' Store [] Soldotna Landfill ' ASegment ! OBoxes collected j Per Month (1993) ti 2.2 Distance Between CO Nodes (miles) i 13 Kasilof Site Figure A-1. Schematic of Solid waste Transfer Sites and Haul Distances (not to scale) A-4 R t Table A-1 Time Factors for Central Peninsula Collection Boxes Run (Segment) Time Per Box, Loading and Transport (hours) Total Estimated Number of Hours 1963 Average Number Boxes Per Month St4erling to Soldotna Landfill 1.1 460 39 (A+B+C) Robinson's Store to Kenai 0.7 251 21 Landfill (I + a + K) Kasilof to Soldotna Landfill 0.8 154 13 (b) Funny River Road to Soldotna 0.7 109 9 Landfill (C + J) Nikishka Industries to Kenai 1.1 550 46 Landfill (H) Kenai Landfill 0.4 327 27 (no transport) Soldotna Landfill 0.4 345 29 (no transport) r� i� i y ip i i (11.6+X)39+ (3.4+ X)9+ (13.4+X)13+ (3.4+ X)29• (4.9 + 110.6 - XD21 + (13.2 + 110.6 - XD46 + (2.8+110.6-XD2 or 90X + 755.8 ■ -94X + 1,782.1 X - 5.56 Cost • 2(90X + 755.8)(per mile cost) Similarly, for Segment (E + K)s (12.2 + X)13 + (2.2 + X)9 + (12.8 + X)39 + (2.2 + X)29 (1.6+ I5.9-X))21+(6.1+ 15.9-XD27+ (16.5+15.9-XD46 9OX + 741.4 • -94X + 1,313.6 j X • 3.1 I , ! ost • 2(90X + 741.4)(per mile cost) Therefore, a site 3.1 miles along the Kaiifonsky Beach Road from the intersection of Kaiifonsky Beach Road and the Sterl- ing Highway is the least cost site in terms of transporta- I tion. This is very close to the Kaiifonksy Beach Elementary School site. Fs To find the additional cost of hauling to the Nikishka Industrial area compared to the Kaiifonsky Beach site, as - sums a site one mile south of the North Kenai transfer site. The cost of hauling to such a site is equal tos 1 x 46 + 9.4 X 27 + (1. 6, + 3.3 + 2.8 + 9.021 + (10 + 2.2 + 5.9 + 3.3 + 2.8 + 9.013 + (2.2 + S.9 + 3.3 + 2.8 + 9.4)(29 + 9) + ! (11.6 + 10.6 + 2.8 + 9.039 • (3,326.5)(per mile cost) Cost to Nikishka site • (3,326.5)(per mile cost) Cost to Kaiifonsky Beach Site • (2�.)(oer mile cost) Difference • (1,284.0)(per mile cost) =" 1,284 box -miles x hour x 62 • 03,980 month m e m e mon (av®rage speed) A-6 f� f Therefore, it would cost about $4,000 per month more to haul solid waste to the Nikishka industries than to haul to the t I J least cost site near the Naiifonsky Beach Elementary School, wing 1993 NOW generation rates. Ad is shown in Section 3, the total 1993 tonnage is estimated to be 26,200 tons. As- suming a facility annual capacity of 32,900 tons, the total annual incremental transportation cost to Nikishka relative to Ralifonsky Beach Elementary School is $60,000 in 1993 dollars, as calculated beiowi :! 4 000 2 900 annual tons facility ca acit 2 months s n f_ -- S'Y_ D Y lmonth 26,200 1983 annual tons )� year �• 060#000 I A-7 r i APPENDIX 8 COST ESTIMATES 0 B-1 APPENDIX B COST ESTIMATES 1, SUMMARY Total Site Work $ 399,000 Building 2,452,000 Process Equipment Mobilisation/Demobilization 3,634,000 18,000 Total Direct Cost, including 301 0605030000 Subcontractors' 0`P Contingency ® 150 975,000 Winter Construction Allowance Q 50 32_00 Subtotal $7,8031000 General Contractors O&P a 101 780,000 Design Engineering e lot 7800000 TOTAL ESTIMATE (2984 Dollars) $9,363,000 2, SITE WORK Clearing and Grubbing $ 10,000 Excavation/Backlili 54,000 Paving 83,000 Pence 22,000 signs 21000 Landscaping 15,000 site Li hting 100,000 site Ut�lities _• 113,000 Total $ 399,000 3, BUILDING Concrete Foundations for Building and $ 455,000 Equipment Pit Welds 8 inch Concrete Slabs, on Grade and 208,000 In pit B-3 r M K 9 3. BUILDING (concluded) 1 inch Topping on Tipping Floor Master Building "Anvil -Top" Pre-engineered Building, 140 loot Clearspan over Tipping Floor Interior Construction Mechanical, Except Tipping Floor ` Mechanical, Tipping Floor Electrical Total 4. PROCESS EQUIPMENT Incinerator and Boiler, 55 TPD each Turbine Generator, 2 KW with Condenser and Piping Ash Handling Equipment Baghouse Septags Treatment System Weigh Scale Stack Fans i Oil Storage Tank and Piping Electric Switchgear Rotary Dryer Clarifier (for Quench water) Front-end Loader t Total 5. PIPELINE ��. 1 _.Item excavation and backf ill (10 ft x 2 ft) 2 inch pavement 6 inch bedding material -- TOTAL 4 .. B-4 L 1 I l h r Total 168400 1,047,000 75,000 109,000 144,000 246,000 M 452,000 $1,400,000 657,000 335,000 207,000 213,000 139,000 161,000 123,000 21,000 140,000 192,000 16,000 30,000 03,634,000 Cost er Linear ft 20.00 1.63 .50 22.13 or 2 3. 00 1 , N 3 .�i 5. PIPELINE (concluded) Cost Item per Linear ft two $-inch pipes @ 20 (material only) 40.00 casing and insulation (material only) 30.00 installation and testing 30.00 TOTAL 100.00 1.4 factor • Alaska construction 140.00 delivery of material 15,00 TOTAL 155.00 total per pipe 77.50 Ziya-&eneth (ft) Trench Length (ft) Hospital/Borough 50600 5,600 building loop Hospital loop to 2 x 2,700 20700 school complex school complex 2 x 4,900 4,900 school complex 2 x 9,000 MOO to Community College and facility�— TOTA, 38,000 22,200 22,000 ft trench 0 23 $ 510000 39p000 ft pipe 9 77.50 2,945,000 TOTAL $31455,000 6. PIPE BRIDGE unit cost, based on east coast span: $1,062/ft bridge cost 8 300 ft: $330,000 1.4 factor - Alaska construction: $462,000 D-5 ry �. 7. PERSONNEL Salary Fringe Cost Title Number (dollars) Benefits (dollars) Plant Manager 1 35,000 1.35 47,250 Licensed Boiler Operator 3 33,000 1.35 133,650 ! Loader Operator 4 •20,000 1.35 1081000 _ Maintenance/Crew 4 20,000 1.35 1080000 Secretary/Clerk 1 151000 1.35 20,250 Subtotal 417,150 overtime shift occurs 1/21 of year: (1/21)(33#000 + 20,000 + 200000)(1.35)(1.5 overtime) 7,000 Subtotal 424,150 Contingency for Contract work 0 171 72,000 , TOTAL 496,150 d 8. UTILITIES AND SUPPLIES ' Boiler Feed Chemicals $ 100000 Electricity 100,000 N - Telephone 20000 ° Auxiliary Fuel 15000 Laboratory Testing (outside laboratory) 10,000 Total $ 137,000 CIO For Nikishka Industries, electricity will cost $131,000 due to its greater worth at retail rate. 9. MAINTENANCE �a A. Building and Exterior Structures (pipeline, pipe bridge) Kalifonsky Beach Electric Generation $ 91,000 Nikishka Industries Cogeneration 50,000 Kalifonsky Beach Cogeneration 890,000 High School Cogeneration 77,000 B-6 F 9. MAINTENANCE (concluded) B. Solid Waste Furnace and Boiler Refractory 8 25,000 Mechanical Replacement 50,000 Welding and Metal Replacement 151000 Septage Mechanical and Pumps 10,000 Electrical Maintenance 150,000 C. Electrical Generation Module Ij Maintenance -and Outside Contractors $ 25,000 ' D. Labor for Maintenance•(non-contract) 0 50400 (in addition to local staff) 10. LANDFILL • C Assume the cost of residue disposal is 60 percent of the cost of NOW disposal due to greater density of material (1,600 ibs/cu.yd.) and possibility of not needing daily cover. (31,700 tons/yr)(0.25 residue)($25/ton disposal)(0.6) 0118,875/yr d s if is I '`rrp s - r .O Ss7 • ' r i N 1 �• U 'i ■ KLGLIVt0 1983 r inter- office memora ^-" kVEST0N,1r1C. TO: R. W. Pease DATE: 4 January 1984 cc: J. T. Duffy R. J. Schoenberger FROM: J. Hamill SUBJECT: Kenai Waste Incineration W. 0. No.: 2392-01-02 We have reviewed the coat estimate prepared by Hanscomb Associates Inc. and submitted via Tryck Nyman & Hayes. '1 With some additions and modifications, including rounding off to the nearest $1000 we used their estimate to prepare the enclosed cost estimate. The total of 09,385,000 is in 1984 dollars, therefore, some escalation will be required. In the event that a turnkey construction contract is selected, the turnkey contractor's fee would be the total of the design engineering and the general contractor's overhead and profit, i.e. 190 of the subtotal. Owner's cost such as site acquisition, administration, construction management, and consultants' fees are not included in the cost estimate. Spare parts are also omitted from the estimates. Sheet 3 - Site Work Estimate is acceptable. Sheet 4 - eui din 19 Revised the concrete work breakdown to'indicate higher cost per cubic yard for walls and foundations. No significant cost change. 2. Added the wear surface cost for tipping floor. 3. Reduced interior construction cost. Tipping area will require minimal interior construction. 4. Reduced mechanical cost. Tipping area will require minimal heating and ventilating. t, {� J RFW: 2.74.39 8-9 r ;7 9. Iry Memorandum to: R. w. Pease -2- 4 January 1984 Sheet 5 - Process Ecuioment 1. Increased incinerator cost. Stringent specifications will be required to ensure reliable systems, therefore, lowest cost equipment may not be acceptable. 2. Increased ash handling equipment costs based on Allen -Sherman Hoff and Beaumont Birch verbal quotes. 3. The electric switch gear cost estimate is acceptable provided some documentation is available. In any case, it is a small part of the total cost, therefore, not critical. . Sheet 6 - General Conditions 1. The site overhead item works out to be about 1.50. we combined this with the main office expense and profit and called it the general contractor's overhead and profit at 100. The enclosed copies of our notes concerning material sources may be of some value to you. B-10 n r1 &HAYES ENGINEERS PLANNERB'SURVSYORS 4621.0 November 23, 2983 i i Nflce/740 1 Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 /907.279.0843 'Cable TNMANCAK/Telex 090.25332 Weston Inc. III S. Bedford Street suite 100 Burlington, MA 01803-5145 ATMs Mr. Bob Pease Dear W. Pews Enclosed we the materials you have requested for completion of the Kenai Incinerator Report, Phase I B. 2e materials consist ofs o A cost estimate prepared by Hansccmb Associates and reviewed by Tryck, Nyman i Hayes, o A discussion of air quality regulations as they pertain to this prom, and o A conceptual design of the belt filter press filtrate treatment system, including costs. Based on 21818 conatrnotion management experience, we believe two items in the Hanscomb cost estimate should be revised. Because of the wide span, the steel superstructure costs should be increased to $ 15.00 per sq. ft. or to $ 462,000. Concrete coats seem a little low, especially if equipment pads will be used. We would recommend increasing the slab-M-grade costs by 100 to $ 481,096. Additional items such as floor armoring would be extra. A 250 design contingency factor was included in the cost estimate. However, engineering fees wore' not included. Most of the engineering will be part of the material aquisition costs for example, the building will be pse-engineered. However, wO suggest You allocate some of the contingency to engineesing services. If you have any questions, please call me at (907) 279-0543. sincerely, , 7r�� ,� Crevensten, P.E. B-11 Project Engineer DAC/slo ' - � a l 'Y- T , Hanscom b Associates Inc. It"istered In the State of AN1M8 801 Wast Northern LOU Boulevard Suits 201 Anchorage, Abtka M03 19071274-7893 i = November 21, 1983 i Tryck, Nyman, 6 Hayes 740 Z Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 i Attentions Dan Crevensten Dear Mr. Crevenstons As requested we have prepared the accompanying conceptual budget estimate for the Kenai Borough Solid Waste Incinerator. Zt is understood that there is no definite site for this Project, therefore, the site related costs assume a reason- ' I ably good site which does not require mass excavation of unsuitable 80118 or peat. Further, the fill included in this estimate is only for general leveling but does not allow for creating a buildable pad on an unbuildable Bite. Due to the great uncertainty with regards to the ultimate 1 site selection the cost of this item has the highest uncer- tainty. The cost of the building is based on comparable buildings In the Anchorage area adjusted by a location factor. This factor accounts for subsistence and travel expenses. This cost is the most certain. The cost of the provesa equipment is based on price quotes • for all major items, quoted freight rates, and quoted inst- allation manpower and equipment requirements., Included in the equipment cost Is a 10% allowance for miscellaneous r material required, and a subcontractor's markup of 304 to cover overhead expenses and profit. Verified pricing accounts for over 754 of the equipment costs. Additional Information was taken from provided material as well as reference material. The certainty of the equipment cost approaches the certainty of the building. The general conditions provided are generous due to the limited information available at this time. The escalation factor based on 6% annual inflation rate is quite optimistic ` for the three-year period and construction should proceed [` as soon as possible to avoid unexpected increases in the F inflation rate. . 8-13 Anftrages AQefta• Chicago • Dallas• Los Angeles' New Vorko SeWee Washington O.C. • Athens Bahrain • Lagos• London • Montreal Toronto pone � t R t I• f. i t tt I` - f J e. Mr. ban Crovensten rrvckf 1v1fivant a Raves November 22, 1983 ps go lew) This estimate to Internally 0020 40ourate than the level Of d*819a Justlildw* At this stage the scope is likely to change, thereby producing project cage Variations which are much larger than Individual variations in the 14-- 4&wn' Costs. The vszlsnc@ Of the VzOJ@O9 cost due to Item cost change Is about 104 while projects at this state may change In total cost by #30% or more. M you have any questions, or require further clarification, please do not hesitate to call me. Regards, Uamo# C. Paterson MANSCONS ASSOCIATES, ZMC. C. B-14 .. M r-7-7 II CONCEPTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE, SObID WASTE INCINERATOR ; to KENAI DOROUCII, ALASKA I I Cost_Conaultant Ilanscomb Alinucrtntorr, I nu. 501 Wost Northern Llryhtu Bnuluvard Suite 201 i Anchoraqu, Alanka 9950.1 I Novembc+r 22., 198.9 f ' S ra 4 y t � e I Y f � i .. f Prepared —for Tryuk, Nyman, h Hati u Eng1nuurulPIannurri/Survuyura 740 1 Strout Ancho.rago, Alaska 99501 ,Solid Waate incinerator Kenai Doruuyl►, Alaska Cnncnptua l Rudgpt Flatimato Novvmber 22, 1983 SHEET NO, 1 Notes Rojjardiny�ProparatJoe Of This Estimate, This estimate has been prepared from quantities taken, where possible from a narrative providod by Tryck, Nyman, 6 llayas, of Anchorage, Alaska. The estimate Is based on current construction costs with an escalation factor of 16% to r„flect a July, 1906 bid date. if the project is delayed beyond this time add .75% per month for .inflation. A l54 design contingency is added for unknowns concerning the project. F, A competitivo bidding situation is assumed. Ch I This is a probable construction cost estimate only and does npt include AI ti foes, vonsultnnts' foes, loose equipment, land acquisition, administration, or any othor off -site costs. 8 10,;t6 & 920!., I r I y i + fIII �_ - - - -- - - --- �T f Solid Wanta lnuinurator Kenai Borough, Alanka Conceptual Budget L'ntlmate November 22, 1983 - __ _ saectwrnnYs.�.il BHERT NO, :! i I • 8 U M M A R Y — SITE WORK ............................................. $ 398,6000 BUILDING .............................................. 2,739,340. l PROCE88 EQUIPMENT ..................................... 3,535,000. 1 I GENERAL CONDITIONS....................0............... 2,180,440. i CURRENT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET TOTAL ESCALATION (DECEMBER# 1983 to JULY, 1986 - 32 MONTHS AT 61 .... 6 5._4_0...", . ESCALATED BUDGET T07PA1. 8 I0,269,,920. I I 7i 1 , ,ew 0901991: solid Wanto znvinorator E xonsi Borough, Alanka a a_ Conco teal putigot Hatimato o Spacilication/Location sitorWork Cioaring and grubbing excavation/backtill to lovvl nito Paving Pence signage Landscaping site lighting site utilities lament: Br! hne: Novel Ouenlity 2 5,360 41 , 600 1,080 Allow Allow Allow Allow M WORK Skeet No. 3 nbor 22, 2903 .. - unit Estimated Remarks Cost ao 20,000. cy 93,600. at 83,200. it 22,600. -- 2,000. 18,000. -- 100,000. -- 113,200. Estimated Cost = 390,600. Rate per SF Floor Area $ i I c u ti w ur Project: Solid Nanto lnvinorator Elemen� Bu Kenai Borough, A1anka Date: conc pA_ual Budgot Rstlmato o _ Novoi Spoci icelion/Location Ousnlity BuJJdJnq Foundation 30,800 Blab on grade 30,000 Superstructure 30,000 Exterior closure 30,000 Rooting 30,000 rnterior. construotion 30,000 Nechanlcal 30,000 6loctrlcal 30,000 rr+DING Sheol No. 4 nbor 22, 190J Unit Estimated Remarks Cost of 186,340. at 487,860, at 434084. of 319,400. of 332,020. of 324,320. at 406,020. of 242,700. Estimated Cost S 2, 7 39, 340. pole per SF Floor Area S Cost Plan { M t w 1 to N 0 I a Protect: Solid Wasto Invinerator Kenai earou9h, Alanka �ogcogtugl Budyot ,Estima.to Specification/Location Procetrs EgyApmont (2) 55 Ton/day incinorator and boiler Turbine .generator Ash handling conveyor, binu Bog hound 8optage system Weigh scale Stack Pans Oil storage Electric switch year Rotary dryer Clarifier ' 3ement: PRC lap: Novell ouantity item Itom Item Itom atom Item stem atom atom Itom item Item CESS HOUZPNRNT Sheet No. 5 ibvr ?P, 1903 Unit Estimated Remarks Cat 1,332,000. -- 656,600. 334,600. 207,200. 212,800. I -- 130,600. -- 161,000. 1?3,200. -- 21,000. 140,000. -- 191,000. -- 15,400. Estimated Coll S j,535,000. Rate per SF Floor Area, $ i A C- A Man ii i iLy J � r • 1 , J ' 1 If "- J I I i i { -h- b1 N t Project: Solid Waste Incinerator Element: GENERAL CONDITIONS Sheet No. 6 Kenai Borough, Alaska Conco,Ptual Budyvt Estimate DIM: November 22, 1903 Specilicetion/Location Quantity Unit Estimated Remarks Cost Genoral Conditions Design contingency 15 t: 1,000,940. Winter construction 5 383,690. Mobilization/demobilization Allow - 20,000. Site overhead 8 mo. 120,000. Main office expense and profit 8 S 655,810. Estimated Cost S 2,100,440. Rate per SF Floor Arn S • � Nsnseanb i Arroei�sn Ine. Cost Plan 1 1. ■ r— 0— w Jrne• 111 � April 4, 1984 Kenai City Council Dear Friends, Peninsula Home Health care is appealing to the City of Kenai for financial help through Revenue Sharing for Kenai City residents. As part of the City of Kenai's concern for the welfare of all residents, whether It is having paved roads to drive on or in knowing they are being protected by a concerned police and fire department, we feel that it is part of their concern to assist the community in staying well and having the necessary facilities to achieve this state of health and contentment. With all the other services available to its citizens, there is no place to go for extended care and until now, there has not been the option to stay at home to convalesce or in some cases, be able to stay home instead of entering the hospital or coming in for daily outpatient care. PHHC is now offering that option from its own locally owned and operated agency. We do not feel we are competing with the hospital or any other agency for business, we are a supplement and alternative for those who prefer to remain in the comfort and security of their homes with the love and assistance of their families. It has been proven that the rate of recovery and the quality of life improves when a patient is allowed to recover or die in his familiar surroundings. Many hospital stays can be shortened with the help of home health care. The Municipality of Anchorage has been assisting Home Health Care, Inc. for three years now on a diminishing grant as the agency's percentage of reimbursements im- proves. in 1982 the Municipality supported 46% of all visits made by the agency. That rate is now down to 5-10%. Patients unable to pay are requested to file a financial report so payment can be made on a sliding scale. The amount provided for each resident of Anchorage was $3.55. If we allowed 46% of our projected visits of 928 this first year, we would need $32.016 to supplement those who could not pay for services. PHHC is proposing an allocation of $2.50 for each resident of Kenai, totaling $14,300 for one year. One of the most pressing justifications for the survival and growth of Home Health Care is the reality of Medicare's new regulations on patient reimbursements to the physician and hospital. As across the country, hospitals will be able to collect only a fixed amount per diagnosis and for a predetermined length of stay in the hospital. This pressure will force patients out of the hospital sooner than either he or the physician would like or have been used to. These Diagnosis Re- lated Groups or (DRG'S) have necessitated communities across the country to develop various forms of extended care facilities from a hospital -based home health care program to one such as our agency has initiated. Perhaps the hospital should have initiated a home health care facility as a hospital service. In the absence of this much needed service, PHHC was started in coopera- tion with the hospital in all except funding. A recent national analysis showed costs of a one month huspital stay at $6,000, Nursing Home care at $1,200 minimum and only $250 for home health care. The Directors and staff of PHHC have been encouraged by the community support and assistance for the concept of being cared for in the home after or instead of hos- pitalization. The senior citizen population on the Kenai Peninsula over the past few years has increased. Besides the increased quality of life and health when one can recover at home with the family as a support system, the home health care has become a much preferred alternative to hospitalization or nursing home for Medicare and private insurance companies because of the large savings in reimburse- ments they have experienced with the growth of Home Health Care industry. As an example, in 1977 Blue Cross of Maryland has saved over $600,000 serving 324 people with an average of 9.6 fewer hospital inpatient days per case. This point has been pointed out by the hospital as a positive move so that they wouldn't feel the crunch for acute care beds. There are many other statistics supporting the acceptance and support of home health care as a viable alternative in extended health care to a facility that would be expensive to house patients and would also take them away from their families. We are not disputing the place for a nursing home in the Kenai-Soldotna area some time in the future. What we feel we the residents of the Central Kenai Peninsula area need now is a service that not only coordinates its care with the other health and social services in our area, but also provides a cost-efficient service to those who can and cannot pay. We feel the people of our peninsula should be able to re- ceive health care when needed even if it means with the assistance of our cities. Now many would feel more secure knowing they wouldn't have to go to Anchorage for certain care or could come home earlier if there was someone to assist them with their sick child or elderly parent at home. We are appealing to our local govern- ments especially because you are part of the community and could well be wishing we were there _for.you- someday. The Directors are looking forward t9 your moral as well as your monetary support. Sincerely, n n. - �- -- �2.1 I rl" 161 C-� Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 914-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING KMC 20.05 DELETING REFERENCE TO THE PUBLIC VEHICLE COMMISSION, AND MAKING IT EASIER TO UNDERSTAND. WHEREAS, the City df Kenai does have an interest in assuring that vehicles for passenger hire are properly identified and insured, and WHEREAS, the present ordinance governing taxicabs was based on the regulatory provision of the Alaska Transportation Commission in its regulation of other passenger vehicles for hire, and WHEREAS, the provisions of the Alaska Transportation Commission referred to in many of the sections of the present ordinance have been rescinded through deregulation, making the present ordinance confusing to interpret. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that KMC 20.05 is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as attached. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 4th day of April, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Redding: February 1, 1984 Second Reading: April 4, 1984 Effective Date: July 1, 1984 A a: F -111 k---1- - - Title 20 TRANSPORTATION Chapters; 20.05 Passoiiner Vehicles For Hire Chapter 20.05 PASSENGER VEHICLES FOR HIRE Sections: 20.05.010 Definitions. 20.05.020 License required. 20.05.030 License. 20.05.040 License plates and numbers. 20.05.050 License fees. 20.05.060 Passenger vehicles for hire cards and rates. 20.05.070 Passenger vehicles for hire. 20.05.080 Public liability insurance. 20.05.090 Passenger vehicles for hire rates to be computed. 20.05.100 Charter. �- 20.05.110 Penalty. 20.05.010 Definitions: (a) Unless otherwise expressly stated, whenever used in this chapter, the following words QW -1 have the meanings given to them by this section: (1) "Passenger Vehicle for Hire, or Vehicle" means a motor -driven passenger vehicle which is offered for public hire. (2) "Driver" shall mean and include any person who drives a ` Passenger Vehicle for Hire, whether such person be the I owner of such Passenger Vehicle for Hire or be employed by � such a company. (3) "Company" shall mean and include any person owning or haviny control of the use of one or more Passenger Vehicles for litre used for hire upon the streets or engaged in the business of operating a Passenger Vehicle for Hire within the City. (4) "Stand" shall mean and include any place along the curb, street, or elsewhere which is excluoively reserved by the City for the use of Passenger Vehicles for Hire. - - (5) "Persons" shall mean and include one or more persons of either sex, natural persons, corporations, partnerships, and associations. 20.05.020 License. Required: (a) To operate a Passenger I Vehicle for Hire within the City limits, a company shall first obtain a license therefor by apply0og ar:nually in writing to the - Clerk. Each applicant for a license shall apply upon a form r i P� Ord. 914-84 Page 2 0 n (1) be a citizen of the united Staten, (2) be of the age of 19 years, or a duly qualified corporation, (3) file a statement describing each vehicle to be so licensed, giving: Ei] full name and address of the owner; [ii] the class and passenger -carrying capacity of the vehicle. [iii] the length of time the vehicle has been in use; Dv] the make of the vehicle; [v] the engine number; Evil the serial number; [vii] the State license number; Eviii] whether said vehicle is leased, licensed, or under any form of contract; [ix] what person, firm, or corporation collects the revenues from the operation of said vehicle and pays the expenses of operating t1-,c same; and [x] proof of insurance. 20.05.030 Licenses Upon receipt of the above information, end payment of t e� required fee, the City Clerk shall issue a license. The license may not be transferred. 20.05.040 License Plates and Numbers: (a) Each licensed vehicle shall bear the license number or the vehicle and proper descriptive words, including the year for which the license was issued, by displaying the name on the windshield of the vehicle. (b) Every vehicle accepting business from points originating within this municipality shall have some designation of the character of the vehicle affixed or painted in plain visible letters on each side thereof. 20.05.050 License Fees: (a) The applicant for a license, or license for an additions vehicle shall pay into the City treasury the sum set forth below. (1) A licensee shall pay a license fee of $250 per year which shall entitle said operator to one Passenger Vehicle for Hire. (2) In the event a licensee is licensed for more than one vehicle, then he shall pay $100 per year for each additional vehicle so authorized. (3) All licenses shall be for the term from June 30th of one year until July 1st of the following year, or any segment thereof. (4) All taxes and other obligations due to the City and norough must be current prior to license renewal. 20.05.060 Passenger Vehicles for Hire Cards and Rates: The operator of any Passenger Vehicle for Hire shall display inside the vehicle a card legible to a customer seated in the rearmost seat stating the license numbers, the maximum rates of fare, and a notice that any article left in the Passenger Vehicle for Hire J must be returned to the City offices, where it may be identified and claimed. r Ord. 914-84 Paqe 3 J n D a , i {, Y�r / a ` 20.05.070 PnnsinnrZnr Vehiclen for Ifirms Panneenger Vehicles for Hire oholl be parked tit stands sso duosgneted for that purpose frun time to time by the City Ftsnagerr, No driver r;hall oolscit pasiriengers au farun. No driver shall dismount from his, Pounrrnger Vehicle, for Ifire sit any time for the purpose of soliciting paueionherra, provided that this shall not prohibit any driver from asaiesting a pass,onger entering or dismounting from a vehicle. Only licensed vehicles shall be permitted to park at any atand. ! 20.05,080 Public Liability Insurances An operator shall file with the City Clerk evidence or insurance certifying the operator is insured for liability for damages on amount of bodily injury or death, or for damages to property resulting from the: ownership, maintenance, or use of any Passenger Vehicles for Hire. The limit of such Insurance policy shall not be lean than $350tOOO for bodily in;;:ry to, or death of, one person and $5000000 on account of any one accident resulting in injuries to j' and/or death of more than one person# and $100,000 liability for damage to g property of olhern, arising out of any one accident. Such policy shall be endorsed to give the City 30 days notice of expiration or cancellation. 20.05.090 Passenger Vehicles for Nice Rates to be Comouteds The company shall (Peter all Carla. The sealers uhal-1 he the type or typists commonly used throughout the United States. Inspection of such faces shall he monitored and approved by the State of Alasko, Division of weighto and Mesaouresi. No Passenger Vehicle ~` for dire shall be operated unleoo it is equipped with a meter in good condition to rucced the amount to be charged on each trip, which amount shall be shown in figurers visible to the passenger. ' Upon paying his; fans, each passenger making a request therefor shall be givers a receipt showing the amount so paid and the name of the company or persons operating the Pasuenger Vehicle for Hire, together with the number of the vehicle if ouch company or person operates more than one Pas;norsqur Vehicle for Hire In the City. 20.05.100 Charters Notwithutanding any provision contained in this chapter, nothiing shall preclude negotiated charter rates ?� between a licensee and a customer provided said orrangernentss are ' ent►3rod into at least three hnirrs prior to trans;port being rund4ired snd reduced to writing prior to transport, Vehicles; operating under charter need not be motesrud. 20.05.110 Penaltys Any person violating any provisions; of this chapter shall be guilty of a misidemeanor and shall upon conviction thereof he punished by a fine of not more than .$300, Ord. 914-84 Paqu 4 J Surpt©nted toys Adminintriot sari CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO, 920-04 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KE NAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS OY $AH,555 IN A # NEW CAPITAL PROJECT FUND ENTITLED "CAMAI CIRCLE", i� WHF4EAS, the City ban hoer; petitioned to form an anoonoment dtetrict on Comai Circle to Kiono Subdivtoion in Kenai, and WHEREAS, $609955 of water and newor boodo in all that r©matno of the 1974 Rofundinq bond iaoue, and i WHEREAS, the water Arid nawer portion of thin project to a major element of the project, and Council findo that it io in the Cityle boot intoreat to uae the remaining) bond moniea for tho entice project, boenuoe any remaining water and oowor bond monioo i would probably be inouffiotont to finance any other projocto, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY Of 9ENA1, ALASKA# that the following ineraaoeo to Entimatod Rovonuen and Appropriationa be inades CAMAI CIRCLE CAPITAL PR03E CT FUND Incrnaoe Entimatod Rovenuoas 1974 Refunding Hondo Increaoe Appropriationns Admi nint cat ion $ 559 Engineorl"Q/Inapectian 90000 Conatruction 53,UOU Contingency G ODO PA63ED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or KENAI, ALA9KA, thin 4th day of April, 1904, ATTESTS a idt Wholoolt city e c Approved by Finances Firot Readings Morels 21, 1904 Second Readtngs April 4, 1904 Effective Dates April 49 1904 -. •an�lAMl®•�w�rn i elf � w�=---�--- _ - .-tea -�--_ _.. ewyi�.�e...i+�_>�,"`��� �. —. - �.a -�--t' ♦:.-r. .� Dox 1022 Kenai, Alaska 99611 April 2, 1984 City of Kenai Kenai Alaska 99611 RES PVOPO00d Regency PO!nte Assessment District aentlomon: As owners of all the property in the proposed assessment district, we at this time desire to withdraw our application for the aaaossmcnt district. we must object to the formation of this assoaement district on tho basio that it has become cost prohibitive due to several dovelopmonto which have come about during the course of the project: 1. The City0o unforsoon position of requiring the Upgrading of the public road presently regorred to as Candlelight Pxtontion to be paid for by our private development funds has Wded substantially to the project cost. 2. City estimates for road engineering, construction and upgrading as set up by the proposed arssessment district are over 2h times the rough estimates rocoived for the same work by private contractors. 3. Actual ground Surveys just completed have vorified considerably loco lot spaco available than that indicated by original aerial surveys which veto used to prepare the preliminary plat for ROgancy Pointo, individual lot asseasmonts would thoroforo be increase to prohibitive proportiona. - in view of the above wo have elected to pursue Regency Pointe development privately. We appreciate your consideration Of Our request to withdraw. Rasp® tfu -1Y submitted, •0-716 11.6.E �e4.i " r..mmsrssaaaaa�� erne t - Cwnor . uusnocz M i i i �r Box 1022 Kenai, Alaska 99611 April 2, 1984 City of Kenai Kenai, Alaska 99611 REs Proposed Camai Circle Assessment District Gentlemen$ As present owners of all of the property in Camai Circle, we at this time desire to withdraw our application for the assessment district. We have a buyer who desires to purchase the entire project and who does not wish the property to be encumbered with the assessment district. It is possible for him to develop the proporty privately according to existing approved engineering specifications and it is his desire to do so. We Appreciate your consideration of our request to withdraw. Respectfully submitted, -fl W.M. Burnett - Owner Jill. Burns t - Owner w! ' • A .. uggesCed bys Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 921-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES 6 APPROPRIATIONS BY $10500,000 IN A NEW CAPITAL PROJECT FUND ENTITLED "FSS FACILITY". WHEREAS, the City intends to construct a building for the Federal Aviation Administration's use for a flight service facility in Kenai, and WHEREAS, the total cost of the project is not expected to exceed $1,5000000, end WHEREAS, the FAA has agreed that the land for the facility is to be provided by the Airport Land System without cost to the General Fund in that the Airport is doomed to be a beneficiary of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i KENAI, ALASKA that estimated revenues 6 appropriations be increased as followss General Fund Increase Estimated Rovenuess Appropriation of Capital Improvement Reserve Q1 ASQQ+QQQ Increase Appropriationss Non -Departmental - transfers out JIAHO.OiQO0 FSS V4citity Capital Prop oct Increase P.etimated Revenueos Transfer from General Fund $t`OrQiOQQ 4 increase Appropriations; i Administration $ 1,000 Design/Inepection 146,000 Construction 1,230,000 Contingency 123 000 I� I I � J r , i � r I7 1 , r� F PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAIO ALASKA, this 4th day of April, 1984, TOM Abt fi, UR ATTESTs Janet a an, City Clark Firat Readings March 21, 1994 Second Readings April 4, 1904 Effective Dates April 4, 1994 Approved by Finances A N • N JF I CITY OF KENAI 010 FIDALOO KENAI, ALASKA 00611 TELEPHONE 068.7636 ' March 26, 1984 _ MEMORANDUM TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 921-84 D t As requested by Councilman Wise, the following is a possible amendment to Ordinance No. 921-84 to further explain the J financing of the FSS Facility: Amend Ordinance No. 921-84 by substituting the following paragraph for the 2nd "WHEREAS" paragraph in the Ordinance: r "WHEREAS, the City's non -reimbursable commitment to the ` project is 01,500,000, with any excese over that amount, up to 0500,000 of costs, chargeable to the FAA as rent over a 20-year period, and" ' CAB/jo { I k - j T' r t` i C "L4 Sugquatod bys Mnyor Tom Waqoner CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 922-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY i;60,0OO IN A NEW CAPITAL PROJECT FUND ENTITLED "COMMUNITY CENTER" BY REDUCING APPROPRIATIONS IN THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS KNOWN AS "POLICE ADDITION" AND "LIBRARY ADDITION". WHEREAS, in.both the "Police Addition" Capital Project Fund and the "Library Addition" Capital Project Fund, amounts appropriated for design and inspection exceed the estimated amounts that will be needed for those serviced, and WHEREAS, Council desires to use some of the excess monies for design of a community center. NOW, THEREFOREO RE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations be Increased (decreased) as follows$ Library Addition Decrease Estimated Revenuess 1974 Refunding Bonds 40 OQ� Decrosso Appropriations: Engineering O O10 Police Addition Decrease Estimated Revenues: 1974 Refunding Bonds Ig4,Q AOOj Decrease Appropriations I%Qg� Engineering Community Center Increase Estimated Revenues • 1974 Refunding Bonds �AOiQf�0� Increase Appropriations Administration 10000 Engineering 792000 Ji ' w y .n -f1 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 4th day of April, 1984. TOM WAGURritt MAYOR i ATTESTS Janet he an, City Clark FAret Readings March 21, 1984 Second Readings April 4, 1984 Effective Dates April 4, 1984 Approved by Finances r . I i f =4 1 I -' Suggoyt;ted byt Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAIO ALASKA, ACCEPTING A GRANT INCREASE FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,451 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LAWTON, WALKER, TINKER, ROGERS WATER AND SEWER. WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has offered the City of Kenai a grant incroaoo for $319451 for the construction of water and sewer improvements on Lawton, Walker, Tinker, and Rogers, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai agrees to accept the responsibility to operate and maintain the proposed water and sewer improvements and agrees to the terms and conditions of the grant offer, and WHEREAS, this grant offer must be formally accepted by the City of Kenai. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1 KENA19 ALASKA, that this grant increase in the amount of $31s451 from tho State of Alaska is heroby accepted for the construction of Lawton, Walker, Tinker, and Rogers. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CIfY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 4th day of April, 1984. OA V , i ATTESTS w ` anal Whelass# City ec cl"r V ry ' Approved by F inaticu s r. a B 11 . i Suggested bys Adminiotration j I CITY OF KENAI i RESOLUTION NO. 84-30 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1903-84 GENERAL FUND OODGETs _.. F Toms Shop-Oporating Supplies <$1,375> To$ • �`� Shop -Miscellaneous $1,375 Thia tranofee providao money for basic and advanced welding training for a shop employee. -' PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 4th day of April, 1984. MAYOR r .� AT TEST s janut Wfielant City ulerR ' Approvud by Finances .._-:La k r I r r i I SUBSTITUTE Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-31 C-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE TERMINATION OF THE CAMAI CIRCLE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has held a public hearing to hear comment concerning the necessity for the water, sewer, and gravel road improvements, and the proposed asaeasments relating to ouch improvements, on Camel Circle in a proposed subdivision to be known as Kiana Subdivision, and WHEREAS, property owners who would bear 100% of the coat of the assessment district have objected to the formation of the district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the proposed Camel Circle assessment district be terminated. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 4th day of April, 1984. r ATTESTS Janet Whelant City Clerk u. _ ll .•I SuUgotited by Adminiat rot ion CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 04-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE CAMAI CIRCLE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai hau hold a public henring to hear comment concerning the necessity for the water, sower, and gravel road improvements, and the proposed assessments relating to such improvements, on Camel Circle in a proposed subdivision to be known as Kinno Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Council finds it desirable to continue with the proposed project and 000eosment district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thats Section 1s The water, sewer, and gravel road improvements on Camai�icera are necessary and of benefit to the properties to be seasoned. Ssc:tion 21 The senessment district has not been objected to by owners of properties bearing 50% or more of the estimated coats to be borne by property owners, Section 3s An accounting shall be kept of the costs of these improvements, and after all costa are known, the City Manager shall prepare an eoeeaament roll for the improvements. It is estimated that 1000 of the costa of the improvements may be seasoned against the benefited properties. PASSZ*9 BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAit ALASKA this 4th day of April, 1984. YUM WAGONE09 MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Who alit City Clerk Approved by Finances a qa J I ' a IA Mal Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO, 84-32 - BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES RE MADE IN THE 1983-84 GENERAL FUND BUDGETS F Toms Other - Contingency 4$1t700> To$ Street Lighting - Repair do Maintenance $19700 This transfer provides money for repairs of various street lights. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 4th day 1 of April, 1984, ; r TUM t . ATTESTs onet Whelang City Clerk Approved by Finances ee?kl 1• I i 16 i r i 1 A. B. C. 0.1 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING MARCH 7, 1984 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL i 1. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 904-83 - Establishing Tenancy Requirements in Airport Terminal 2. Ordinance 916-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Codq - Restricting Disposition of Principal Proceeds of Sales of City -Owned Lands 3. Ordinance 917-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Preference to Purchaae-Applicants Over Loase-Applicants in Selling City -Owned Lands 4. Ordinance 918-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Alcoholic Beveragoa, Liquor Licenses 5. Ordinance 919-84 - Finding Certain City -Owned Lands Not Required for Public Purpose 6, Resolution 84-18 - Setting Charter Amendment for October 4, 1904 Eiection - Restricting Principal Proceeds of Sales of City -Owned Lands 7. Resolution 84-19 - Transfer of Funds - Partition in City Hall - $1,961 S. ReaoluLlon 84-20 - Transfer of Funds - Recreation - Un-Anticipated Costs - $139500 9. Resolution 84-21 - Awarding Engineering Design - Electric Monitoring System for City - IISC - $17#680 10. Resolution 84-22 - Setting Date of Public Hearing on Camai Circle Assessment District 11. Resolution 84-23 - Transfer of Funds - Overtime for Legal Secretary - $330 12. Resolution 84-24 - Accepting DEC Grant Increase, Main St. Loop 6 Barnacle, Water h Sewer - $18,65i J a a �r D. MINUTES 1, *Regular Mooting, Feb. 15, 1984 f E, CORRESPONDENCE 1. *Marla Adkins, Cordova - Misc. F, OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. *Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. *Requiaitions Exceeding $1,000 3. Leans Application - Blakeley - Etolin S/D - Bowling Center & Indoor Shooting Range 4, Appointment to Borough Sales Tax Committee 5. Parke Report from Recreation Commission 6. Petition - Magic Ave. Residents - City Accept Road for Maintenance 7. Kenai Small Boat Harbor - Requeet for Consideration Be Lawton, Tinker, Walker, Rogers - Inspection Contract - Mike Touriainen a. Possible City Claim b. Possible M, Teuriainen Claim 9. *Games of Chance & Skill - Women's Resource Center 10, Discussion - Konei float Plane Basin If, REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6, Planning & Zoning 7, Harbor Commission 0. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission 1, PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT P • f r �r r KENA1 CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, HlNU1E9 MAHCH 7, 1904, 7sUO PH + CITY ADMiNlgfliArlliN BUILDING _ MAYOR TOM WAGONER PIIC91DING PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE I A. ROIL CALL Prooents Winn, Wagonor, Ackorly, Roillo, flail, Monolon, o Honfor Aboonts None A-1 Agonda Approval a. Mayor Wagoner nakarl that Item C-ti be added, H000lutton 04-24 - Tranofar of funda, Airport Terminal Parking Lot Sewor Pipe - $2,490 b. Mayor Wogenur naked flint item C-14 be added, R000lut►on • 04-26 - Trannfer of (undo, Loglulativo Tranaportation - 3 $7,000 e. Mayor Wagoner naked that item 0-4, Parka Report from Recreation Commionion, be deleted. d. Mayor Wagoner naked that Item 0-11, "EA Land Offer, be addod. a. Mayor Wagoner naked that Purchono Ordor dtotributed j �,..•42L) thin date Wontern Utilitloa, $2,128 be added under item 0-2, Requiottiono Exceeding $1,000. Council approved the agenda no charrgud. A-2 Conoont Agonda MOTION$ Couniilmon Woo moved, aocondod by Councilman H000loo, to (. approve the Cenaont Agenda an oubmitted. Notion panned unanimoualy by roll call vote. 0. PERSJNS PPESENf SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD " Nano C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 904-83 - Eotabliohing Tenancy Requiromento in Airport Terminal .....,....,.M- ... .. ..,... ,.,. �, MOTION$ Councilmen Moaaloo moved, oecondod by Councilmen Ackorly, to adopt Lisa ordinanno. E - There woe no public comment. Motion panned unanimouoly by roll Tall vote. ' C-2 Ordinance 916-94 - Amoodinry KMC- flnotrietin<1 Oinpunitsoot of r Principal Proenado of Solna of City -Owned Lando i MOT 1011$ +. Councilman Meauloo moved, aerondrrd by Councilman hall, to ! J adopt the ordinancn. f ,. There woo no public comment. 4 7' `t v IF s� ll r . . r t�A$x1ufAMot6 ., -, - ��..�__ ;mod=. �.--- ----- - � : - . ,.. _•-. i di ., / 11 %✓.'r.liner.a...',:.v..;..a......ww:�. .....t KCNAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1994 Page 2 Councilman Wtuo unid thti► will rootrict use file capital Improvemonln, wo have a ryront need. We are lunving off Internal revo►tuon of ousolo we have, We will not got enough from the Logiolataro for what we wool. Noyce Wngoaur ropltodo conto would be recouped by nuaeoumontu. Councilman Wlau quoationad haw It would be onanoned on Soation 34. Mayor Wagunae avid the rootdonte of the City prefer a low mill rote, thin will unauro Ohio. We olun Novo band capability to do capital impruvemontu. Vote (Poanod)I Yoas Wagoner, Aekorty, 11111116, Hall, Monition, Mnnfor Nor Wine C -3 Ordiii6iuo 917-01► - Amending KNC - Preference to Percheoo-Applieinta Over t0000-Applionnto in Selling City -Owned Lando MOTION$ Councilman Ackerly moved, aecondod by Councilman Manatee, to adopt the motion. MOTION, Withdrawals Councilman Ackorly moved, with conoont of second, to withdrew the motion. Since this ordinance woo tabled without introduction at the Feb. 15 meeting, It required introduction. Council agreed to add thin no itom 0-5. C-4 Ordinance 910-04 - Amending KMC - Aicoholto Beverages, Liquor Licenoeo MOTION$ Councllman Meoslea moved, oocondod by Councilwoman Nonfor, to adopt the ordinance. There woo no public comment, Councilman Wioo naked, who will make the determination for public hearing? Mayor Wagoner replied, anyone who wont* a public hoarini/ can oak Adminlutratton for it. Right now It to eomp►steoryt this will make it dinaretionary. Councilmen Wise *sid if it to an the Conoont Agenda and to requentod for public hearing, it will not ba advertiaed. City Mannger Orightno explained, Council con roqueat a 30 day daisy and place It on the agnndo of the next Council meeting. Nation p000ud unan►mouuly by toll call vote, C-5 Ordinance 919-04 - Finding Certain City -Owned Lando not Requited for Public Purpoou M I MI Councilman Ackerly moved, nocandnd by fnuncilmon Mooeloo, to adept the ordinnnoo. there woo no public comment, Mutton paaun4 unnntmaisolt by tall call vote. C-h R000lutton H4-10 - Setting Charter Amendment for Oct. 4, 1994 Clsctiun - Houtricting Principal Praceodo of Saloo of City -Owned Lando 1 7 �.--�- - - --_ •.'i�ljpaiy+(yWryq�: - _`. ,�F-�-i�hw.SwF.Y:Y�.w'.:�'..� ` 9FNAI CITY COUNCII. MARC11 7, 1904 Parse f MOTION$ Coisnottmnn Ackorly moved, fiocondon by Councilman Mangloo, to i adopt the regulation. There woo no pubtin comment. Motion pn000d ununimounly by rail call veto), • C-7 Ronatetion 04-19 - Tronnfor of Funde Partition in City #tall - $1,961 140110140 Councilman Ackorly moved, nocondoil by Councilman Menoleo, to adopt the ronatutlan. There woo no public comment. Nation pn000d by unanimauo eonnent, C-0 Reanlution 04-20 - Tronnfor of Fundo - Recreation • On-Anticipetod Coate - $13,4o0 ; Holton$ i Coesneilmon Ackerly moved, ooconded by Councilman Meooleo, to adopt the r000lution. j Thorn woo no public comment. Motion pafiged by anaaimoafi eonnent, , C-9 Reoolution 84-21 - Awarding Engo"coring 060ign - Electric ' Monitar►ng Gyotom for City - 115C - $170600 1 NOTIONS ` Councitmen Ackorly moved, nocondod by Councilwoman Nonfor, i to odop►. the r000lution, There wan no public comment. Public, Verkn Otroctor Kornel►a axpta►nod, the electronic noaitarinq oyotom would coot $120,000, $20#000 for engineering. There would be a warning oyotem for the well hounoo and never treatment plant. Adm►niatrgt.ion reeommendo the City not require liability inuuronco, Thio to the name ••"••""�' form lteed for lar(er projeeta, It in net necenonry for thin, Cho Iaourance would be approximately $3,000 to $4,000. Atty. Rogera said, In public contracto he favaro innuranco. E The rsfik in thlo 10 nominol, hot he would err an the oidn of cenriarvat►ons, Councilman Mngoluo field if it to not needed, + it glsould not be to the contract. We don't know what the bide would he if we olimiant.ed the requirement, Public P- waffle Director K©rnelia axplatned, he naked that the inouranco be put in extra, Councilman Nine good the waiver olsonid be atotod in the r000lution. V019 (Fgilod)s Yous Ackorly, Hall, Monolog nos Vigo, 0r►oloa, Menfor Mayor Wagoner abutained, hn had direct guporvioion of one of k { , tbooc involrpd. f i � a � i t t i FL-- f . G f t E �1 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1984 Pago 4 MOTION$ Councilmen Wine moved, seconded by Councilwoman Oailia, for $1/2 Million E60 ineurancu be included in the proposal by any ongineora. Councilman Measles suggested a minimum limit for a smell job. Councilman Wine said the final job is 5200,000. Councilmen Maslen suggested the larger limit on the mein job. VOTE (foilod)$ Yes$ Wine, Bailin, Nos Wagoner, Ackerly, Hall, Monaloo, Monfor C-10 Resolution 84-22 - Setting Dale of Public Hearing on Comei Circle Assessment Distr►ct MOTION$ Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfort to udopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion panned by unentmoue conoent. C-11 Resolution 84-23 - Transfer of funds - Overtime for Legal Secretary - $330 MOTION$ Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilmen Measles, to adopt the resolution. There wee no public comment. Motion pawed by unanimous conoent. C-12 Asaolution 84-24 - Accepting DEC Grant Increase, Main St. Loop 6 pernocle, Water 6 Sower - $18,652 NOTION$ Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilmen Ackorly, to adopt the rosolution. There wen no public comment. Notion passed by unanimous consent. C-13 Resolution 84-25 - transfer of funds - Airport Terminal Parking Lot, Materials - $2,590 MOTION$ Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Meaaloo, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Public Works Director Kornelta explained, this is between the terminal building and the sewer pipe. It is to replace exiotinq pipe. City crows will do the work. Motion passed by unanimous consent. n "' i [ 1 KENAI CITY COUNCIL f MARCH 7, 1984 } Page 5 C-14 Resolution 84-26 - Transfer of Funds - Legislative Transportation, Travel to Junsnu - $7,000 MOTIONt !� Councilman Ackerly moved, ascended by Councilmen Meselea, to adopt the resolution. . There was no public comment. Motion peened by unanimous consent. i C-9 Resolution 84-21 (REC•,:'SIDERATION) MOTION, Reconsiderations Councilwomen Monfor moved, seconded by Councilmen Ackerly, i to reconsider the motion. Councilwoman Monfor requested all apace be uniform and job specific in the future. , VOTE, Reconsideration (Pessed)t I Yeas Wagoner, Ackerly, Bailie, Hail, Measles, Monfor I , Not Wiee ..�.-.�ro..wo-. ..:.w. ..rs.. _ . a I Councilwoman Bailie said there should be E80 required on future contracts, and the City should be collecting on it. The engineers and contractors should have it. 7. VOTE (Paseed)s Vest Ackerly, Bailie, Measles, Monfor Not Wigs, Hall Mayor Wagoner abstained as stated above. `^ I• D. MINUTES D-1 Regular Meeting, Feb. 15, 1984 t1 i Councilman Measles noted page 9, item G-3T the title is L listed incorrectly. j Minutes were approved under the Consent Agenda. E. CORRESPONDENCE None F. OLD BUSINESS ( None G. NEW BUSINESS 0-3 Lease Application - Blakeley - Etolin 5/0 Bowling Center 6 _• Indoor Shooting Range MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved, neconded by Councilman Wise, to k approve the lases application. f , { Councilman :ckerly anked if the portions left blank on the application have been addressed. Norm Blakeley spoke. There was a plot plan designed. It j does have landscaping. This one to tentative. They will 1! have to move some trees but will put shrubs in. They would i t� it KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1964 Page 6 like to turn the building a bit.. There will be 14 lanes, not 16. American Legion has applied for a shooting range, so he will delete that port►on. The construction will be a combination of steel, wood and stone. The frame will be metal, portions not visible from the road will be metal, the exterior will be wood wall and stone. Mayor Wagoner noted there is another bowling alley proposed. Mr. Olakeley replied there is enough business for him. They intend to apply for a conditional use permit for beer and wine in the restaurant and bowling area. They cannot use without a scheduled league. Councilwoman Monfor asked if there would be arcade games, that would be a hang-out for the kids. Mr. 8takeley replied, there will be some, but not in an enclosed room. Mayor Wagoner noted the Rec Center has video games and will continue to operate them. Mr. Blakeley replied he was aware of that. This is for parents with kids, while they bowl. They will have a nursery. Notion poseea unanimously by roll cell vote. G-4 Appointment to Borough Sales Tax Committee Mayor Wagoner submitted the name of Finance Director Brown. r MOTION$ Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to ratify Mayor Wagoners appointment of Finance Director Brown. :. Motion passed by unanimous consent.` G-S Ord. 917-84 (Moved From item C-3) ; MOTION$ Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to introduce substitute Ordinance 917-64. j Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 1 G-6 Petition - Magic Ave. Residents.- City Accept Road for Maintenance Public Works Director Kornelis explained, this is not maintained by the City, it in not up to City specs. It is not on the McCollum ,job. MOTION$ Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Hall, that Magic Ave. be added to the proposed McCollum/Princoeo project. _ Councilman Measles asked, how many streets in that neighborhood are in the soma condition? Mr. Kornelie replied, that is the only one.Mr. McLane come to Council proposing extending the road to the bluff with a storm drain. Council turned him down. Councilman Measles noted when the flooding problem came up, the ditch the City put in crossed some land without eseementu or authority for the City. Mayor Wagoner added, there are some right-of-way problems there. NOTION: Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Heil, to postpone action till next meeting (March 21) for a report. I' . .., . ... ,:.. , KENAI CITY COUNCIL. MARCH 7, 19R4 Page 7 Councilman Wine asked that the property owners be contacted so they can attend. City Manager Briqhton noted, the State House has a $650,000 budget for water 6 sewer. The City has not requested any special money for water & sewer. He suggested using the money for engineering of water & sewer and put that in at the time of the rood project. Councilman - Wine suggested a study including how many miles, cost of water 6 sewer. Councilman Messina added, right-of-way problems. VOTE, Poetponementi Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. G-7 Kenai Small Boat Harbor - Request for Consideration Mayor Wagoner explained, at the work session this date, Council discussed continuing pursuit of the boat ramp and projected price for the boat harbor, b no engineering till they knew what they would get from Juneau. Mayor Wagoner said he would write a letter to the Governor. MO1IONt Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, that the City Council end/or Administration reaffirm our position concerning the funding of the Kenai Small Boat Harbor, fuel and float facility in the Kenai River. Motion passed by unanimous consent. G-B Lawton, Tinker, Walker, Rogers - Inspection Contract - Mike Teuriainen a. Possible City Claims b. Possible M. Teuriainen Claim Public Works Director Kornelts explained, Council requested this item. Half way through the Lawton, Tinker, Walker project, Council requested stub outs at the corner of Lawton & Tinker. Administration recommended against it. The amount wee $29,000. The drawings showed one stub -out. When M. Teuriainen did the inspection, a 12" sewer stub -out was run out. They dug down outside of the manhole, tied into it and went 72 ft. Wince, Corthell 6 Bryson wanted to tie into this manhole. They discovered 2 stub -auto, one 4 ft. higher than the other. There was a full explanation of this at the time, but no action was taken by Council. The City paid Spruce $10,000 to correct. Administration recommends discontinuing the claim against M. Teuriainen if he discontinues his claim against the City. They are unrelated, but could be made that way. M. Tauriainen'e claim is $13,000, our claim iU J10,000. Mr. Teuriainen spoke. He is agreeable to this recommendation. That is what he suggested when he brought the bill in. Atty. Rogers said he concurred with Mr. Kornelts. MOTION$ Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Ackarly, to accept Piihltc Works Dept, recommendation regard uig both these things. (NOIEt The pusuible City Claim and Taurtatnen claim) Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. I - II f I 4 .ia,:R : .. ...nAiD;•A^.a71•+1`4Mi.c N p i KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1904 Page 0 0-10 Otacunaton - Kennt Float Plano Boots Councilman M000leo rw towed the proposal. It to to build a $500 ft. runway, limited access taxiway, plus access to 4th j St. and alternate to lot St. It liar an alternate for water 8 newer to the next lots. The total project its $3.1 Million. The Airport Commission recommandes a. Proceed with 80 acres of 160 acre parcel as minimum and if possible acquire the total 160 for development. k b. Recommend Council accept the study by Wince, Corthell 6 I!I Bryson and proceed with initial runway construction portion of float plane basin to connect to road beein as funds are available during this construction season. f MOTIONS d Councilman Wine moved that Administration be directed to enter into negotiations with the owner of the 160 acres with f a land swap of other airport lands. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, that the City pursue acquisition of lands necessary for 1 construction of float plane basin at airport. City Manager Brighton noted there are special AOAP funds i available for acquisition of land for airports. Mayor Wagoner added, FAA was very receptive to the suggestion, they said at least 1/2 and maybe all. The problems ores i A. The lend to on the public tax roles b. He is not sure much is developable without wetlands permits. Councilman Measles explained, part of the problem is, there will be a lot of dirt token out.It will have to be disposed of oomewhere. Most of the places will require permit to set it aside. One thought was to dispose in the swamp area and build up to usable property. Councilman Aekerly noted it started as a simple project, it 10 now $3-1/2 Million. i Councilmen Measles explained, some things changed after the meeting with FAA. They will accept this. Airport Committee Member Sibley spoke. Regarding the 63 sitllion project. He has 4 engineers that say they will build it for $1/2 Million. This is required by Council. We area talking oboist a straight line ditch. Council requires 15% contingency. Mayor Wagoner suggested the Committee write request-for-proposalo in phones: a. float plane runway b. taxiway on end He asked that Public Works Director Kornelio, Engineer LBShot, Coisncilmon Nannies and the Airport Committee write up a proposal. Not a dollar bid, but the ingenuity of those on the prop000l. Councilman Wine ouggested talking to FAA end DOT. 95% from Federal funds, 3-1/4% from State and City put in 3-1/4;. There to $8 Million left from in 1993 FAA funds. Mayor Wagoner replied he and City Manager Brighton met with FAA and were told there were no funds available except $600.000 for Kenai. Anything else would be less than $400,000. Councilman Measles said he would like to go to FAA but do the engineering at the same time. City Manager Brighton said FAA has $8 Million available for certain N . . _,.... KENAI CITY COIIYCIL MARCH 7, 1904 Page 9 fundinq. Keno& airport and project» do not qualify. Caunetl net priorities nl airport oxpansten and taxiway, these applications are to FAA. We are alga pursuing State funding. They may have $2.7 Million. but we do not have th&O yet. VOIEs Motion passed by unanimous consent. MOTION$ Councilman Meaning moved, seconded by Councilwoman Saille, that the Airport Committee and Public Works Dept. prepare requost-for-proponaln for float plane baoin design build project and at the some time Administration contact FAA for any possible short term mantes available. Public Works Director Kornelio said the Wince,Cortholl, Bryson report gave a brook -down of coats. He thought $500,000 woo way out of line. Councilman Wine noted the request-toe-proponal will require permits. VOTE$ Motion psoued unanimously by roll cell vote. C-11 HEA Land Offer MOTION, Executive Sessions Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to adjourn to Executive Session regarding mattero, the immediate knowledge of which, would clearly have an adverse effect upon the finances of the City. Clarion Editor quinloy objected, stating the options open to the City era giving the land away, selling at market price, or somewhere in between. The land contract to oat at $100,000. The lands belong to the City. Mayor Wagoner explained a motion for exocuttve session is not debatable. VOTE (Passed)% Yeas Wagoner, Ackarty, Osilte, Hall, Heaolon, Monfor Not Nine Mayor Wagoner requested City Manager Brighton, Atty. Rogers and Lend Manager Lnhahn attend the Executive Session. EXECUTIVE. SES,IUYt 10t20 PH to 10s30 PM. MOTION: Councilman Meaning moved, seconded by Councilwoman Settle, that the Adminintration enter into negotiations with HEA in regard to the 10 acre parcel proposed to be conveyed to them at nu coat and to work out a land swap with FAA rot the proposed parcel of land. Councilmen Htae said if to an appropriating motion disposing of assets of the City without public notice prior to the motion. It ofinuid be by ordinance. Mayor Wagoner said tt will come to ion with an ordinance. This staffs the procedure. KENAI CITY C111J%CI1. MARCII 7, 19114 Pago 10 MOTION, Poutponus Councilman titan moved to pootpone nation to the noMt rneoting whwro formal ronntution will Ito prepared and public will be Invited to ottond and partieipato, Matson died for lack of a oncood. VOIE (P0000d)s You$ Wmlenor, Rniltn, Nall, Meaning, Monfor Nos Wtoo, Ackorly M, REPORTS M-i City manager City Manager Orighton spoke, a, Regarding the prop000d Aaaeoomont Atutrict, Regency Pointe. Problome Oros t. the City hoo taken action on on aaoomont. Thorn to none into that area till action to token. it. Admtniatration douo not hove a problem with the 000noomont diotrict but Council needo to make a �•►f•-M'O' determination on Candlelight. Will It be part of the non000ment district? We have to have federal government approval of all dedicotiona.- Thto to dedicated to porko and recreation. If we do not get• approval, the petitionoro will have to dedicate the full 60 ft, 1. Will the City pay for the upgrade or add to the aosonomento? it. Doea Council went to prop000 to tho federal government 30 ft. of ouro with their 30 ft. on W indoor? fit. 0o we pay or doon it come part of the *eoeooment district? They have no acr000 to their area. Mayor Wagoner *aid they had sold they wontod accono to private property, not development. Councilwoman Monfor noted at PGi they gold it would not coot money. NOf16Ns Councilwoman Dottie moved, ancanded by Councilman Moonloo, that all additional coat, tactudlnq 30 ft. right-of-way be borne by the developer. Public Worku Direetor Koorelso added, they wanted right-of-way and oaoomnnt, but Admintotration told them the City would not maintain. "Often poossed unanimou+sly by roll call vote. b. Mr. Orighton Mau received notico of retirement from Ernte Rimer. Mn to a long-time and valued employee, h the Ctty will moors loom. C. Thera will be a public hearsnq on March 12 at the Horoursh Osottdtrsri retlards,ul rook Inlet Offohore Drilling. d. T ho Fire Dept, ha* osskoll that o pl orison he mounted at the fora Dept., dedseoted to Fronk 'Atoeearver. q j f t I - . .... Ls,.,.••./ •,.. —:,"" .. KC101 CIIV C01N,CIt HAII01 9, 1794 Page 11 Hof (IfHt Caonallnutfr Hoouloo rnovelit Oonoodod by Cnone IIwomuf► Monfort to approve tho plogtso off roqunalod, Notion punned toy fill fill Imoon connant, o, file vivo Oopl., would liko to Cannot their CHI confront With Or, Honoon, fire CI►tof Winulao ogloloinod, thn ountroat, they have now with or, flolefrn retp►troo they contact a phyalalon Worst adminial of toll) drum, At the time title wan preparodt thoro won no 2� hour norvino in tho honpitaf a#ioryuouy room# thorn to nun. It, would too a unplut to unit not fit dental, for (spanner. It to rodoednOt to coltlaet Or, flatfoot) for tnittfilet ionnt than pall tole hooptt.i►1 for further inetruetiono, Atoo, Or, flonoon to bony find difficult to contact, ilia emergency final# in atmont olonya available, 1110 honpitnl dootorn "On do the roquirud monthly roviod, Or, "notion to limited to totnao fie taken aura o1 or Ilia Own patle,Ca, #.i, would be obeot tho name Boots the controot io 1600001, taking part o/ the rnalproot►oo ►naurnr►co would too about Clio Boma, P.oenallmat) N000loo linked if Cho hoopttat doetoro would supply tho training, Chtof Hlnnton replied thoy folt they would (lot morn train/nf lineation they would be working elonor with thorn. Cauno h man Neoaleo noted lhore Worst faulty timou whon the patient wan tranoportod to Or, HatfoentO o//iee rather tolno the honpitnl to onvo tlme, No would lone thin, Collo1 Ntnoton ratified there "Oro tlmoo Wolof] #hay were at) tole Way to the olaopital and had to rotor# to the alinle, Ha how not opokon to Or, Hannon, Mayor Wagoner ouggootod contacting film firot rather than oondint a totter, Counattman "too objected to dtueunalon fit a public meeting before opooking to him, Council agreed to the rrequeet by Ghto£ 91flaton,ift /, Horynrry�lha tf�nli�Hteln/�td ltir alop iris A now n► tulroal wan on ad for# Mr. Btolefold gold he would not opond any mono monoy. This City ban otoppod elf nation. g, Ihoro to to S'ravnl pit ell Nora:.hon Ild,# the dottvao era nogotIa,Ing for tulinquinIltng of title, At the name time the ourouryh to nogetI"Clall for t,itto ao tfiay can mevo the !itorlinq land fill there. That in In the area of Cho Knout stator supply. Hgf10Ht Courrctlman Ackarly moved, esoeoodrd by Coanetlwoman flallta# to direct Admintfit riot toot to lolutm Kanol Poninoula florltugh total Ito do clot Want off bit dulnpod On, Molina paneud unaneinounly by roil call votes, Mr. firigolfoo addodt Council ohoold bes eonrarood about the preooat land fill, they fife fool lrporaf still a "(sundry rand /iI1, but areal inry proporl y for dtonp. IhOy arc dof►troyttfq nomo o/ the blral, land to this oron, Iht net rpt'lf od a ro(ounut In Writing of) it) ohnl atepo Ines florough piano to tako for life nantf.ory land rill in the neat °, yearn, Cotiose IIMon M000loo oesled Cho Oeruuuh tt► livonortriq on ortlloalleo nnlobliehit)q it waltl.fi di'►parinl CnminllIfill, with it laambor from each dtatrsrt and ono at large, fat tiro purpose o/ lolratinry olftrn of rill titnitoaal foetlitintt acid prornrlo►ran, thorn will I►e a publle httoring on Hatch 24, Couoetlmoo Aekerly noted thlifrr 1st ►o eoeurity thorn, JoIll 010"0 pouted, I , i j i i i � i , i 41 ., —r—, , , , ,,. J.. s UNAl 111Y C0114Cii, MAHCII ?, 1'0114 Patin 12 Clio fe t l ngrend t o fir. for ighf clif f) anipptnt tan, Is, Me, It dial off wan to dtinnafo Narotf 1 4 2, At tftn pronnn►, t►me Ilia Italian Capitol Improvement hadrlot to $1,4 fit llton • roach, $00,000 - water A aow"r, $71111,1r00 - ltbrnry addif too, not Ivitoo in the Tinnoto fu► unpllnl improvomn"t pro,j"clri, Ili" ntrport ramp projout hat$ g"nu to rinane" Cnmmitten. Ilu hoo apokon to Rop, Adatnn and San, Ku N tuin. Counaliman Aukarly naked, how mueh to its life lfovaritor'n budgot for Wont? Mr. ortghlon replied, nothttai, ff•2 A(tornay Atty. Holloro opoko, n, Thtrrn fnny be admothing In the Governor'" bill for Fall" I, to, RegurdinrI file airport line, Its Ivan nit opportunity to ratio Iva lbin I(foue, inaludifir) full aooporation of the advotoory in eurrundorinq the licanoo, It would coat the City oboist �h,ItItrf, We ""fold he dlnmtoolnq all claltno, It would [)a nit empty judgcmont if we puroued, he r"Commanded thin dnoialon, W ION$ Cnnnaltmnn Ackorly mtivad, ounandod by Course/!woman Monfort that, the City pay •the oum of f40900 to this honkruptcy court to nnttto all Clotmn tnvolvad with Knout airport bar, Notion pantrad unnotmouoly by roll call voto, Mayor Wagoner aukod, flow tong will it take the court to Como to the point where the City con moka application for lteonoo? Atty, Rogora replied, the cort►ftento one be eurrondnrod to AMP, forthwith, to 110 days Ito should be able to apply for a lieenoo Ito our awn right, a, IIvoro will be a Mooring on.Nulti Vlolo(to March 12, toloconforenee March 1), He will ottond the live flooring in Anal►orogo April Of and will submit tnot iMany , Counolimon Monalon noted it should too In the area aoevad, Atty, Rogoro oorood and replied he Intended to rogioter objection, ft-q Mayor Mayor Wugonor epoko, to, Ito hou boon in Juneau, Going down of tnfurvolo hoo fond notion punitive Orrnel*i, It in tmportant flint Gounott underhand that Joint b""nfoa" file City Ivan funding dean nut moon the Governor will not vats name upprnitrtnt lean, Wit nru trytrfg to allow Our rngnnnl.o aro within ilia clila►ie, to, Ile allnnd"d the Conrnrooten of Mny"ro in Jonnon, Our Irrritnlativo deingaffnn (tfoppOrlo rull manutipel oil atnl zinc", %1" torn thing nit if ,1 atri•aidn campaign for folfi r"nding, u, He rf"ggnatad !'burry l;aremt flit tha ttbrnry COelefnf Stiff, .J N.... - l s.., ,"""s +'. , I I"'h' • i V.1.NA 1 Cl 1Y COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1904 Page I MU T 11IN 1 Cnunallman HBanlae moved, opcirnduel by Councilmen Ackurly, to approve the tlnyor'u ouggeotiun of Cherry Careen for the Library Commionton oppolotmont. "(itself paneled by unnotmeua canaertt. Clark Iihelnn wat) regueutod to notify Mra. Cnrnon, Mayor Hagnner nnlud ail the people ha flat) rocommundud have made apptflat Iono . They have fellow" tntereut. A. Ito hen Gold irnmo commercial property he ettit be receiving fundo for. He will be tnvouting in the City, too wootod to make Council aware. He will be purehouing through the bid proe000. tin did not believe thin to a eonfIlat. U. He hate hod meetinyo with people at the Senior Cantor. He will review the By -Lawn with Atty. Rogarte to conform with other commtooinno. Ho naked for o volunteer ad has member from the Council. H-4 City Clerk Clark Nhulan opoke. of 51e0 will be attending the annual Clark'a seminar in Anchorage 14arah 12 through 16. b, 3he noted tnformatienat item 07 regarding ABC amandmonto and the Horategh proteot. of Gho noted the polio will be open at 7e00 AM inotead of 6$00 PM otorting with the Aliquot 1904 election. d. Tiro paporo for the prop000d incorporation of the City of Niktahka are available in City Hall. H-S finonan Director !lone 11.6 Pl:.nt,iog .v Zoning Nolso 11-7 Horbar Commienion !tone H-B Rnarootion Cremmtooton flecrentlen Director McGillivray the Parke Report will he aaallabte at the Harch 20 meeting, Roceipto for the flee Center fram ;upt. 1 to fob. 2111 1902-8) $12,000 1'/t15-84 $45,01ju lien Peen Canter Out►vity boo atuo inereanad. Then it; why they coked for udditionnl rondo. 00-9 Library Comfotoolm► Coiemllililoner Cafit Iroorit eatd they ern watt inq for the feigning of floe cotil rant , they leave net hied a moat ing. r �-u ZC I I KENAI CITY COUNCIL MANC11 7, 1904 Pngc 14 I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD a. Councilwoman Honfer naked when the Information for the promution of the City will be available. City Hanager Brighton replied Ito would being to the next meeting. b. Councilwoman Nonfat noted they have street. lighto now and it wou appreciated. (NOTEi Thia related to lighto in Thompoon Park) e. Councilwoman Bailie naked if the permit woo requested to uno by.produclu from the oower treatment plant for fertilizer. Public Worke Director Kornelto replied, they are working on it. I+ AWOURNMENTi /7 Meeting /adjourned 11 i 49 PH. �Janot Whelan City Clark a f I 1 F I ' I . 41 " 7 j i I AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING MARCH 219 1984 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk(*) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. S. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Clarence Ladd - Cleaning up streets and old buildings in old Kenai 2. Bruce Robson with McLane - Section 36 status report 3. Eddie Turner - Peninsula Savings 6 Loan - Automatic Telling Machines at Airport C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, Ordinance 917-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Preference to Purchase Applications Over Leaso Applications in Selling City -Owned Lando 2. Resolution 04-27 - Setting a Date of Public Hearing on the Proposed Regency Pointe Assessment District 3. Resolution 84-28 - Transfer of funds on MAP Project - Additional Engineering - $30,362 a. McLane's Cost Estimate for Additional Work - Magie Avenue h Water h Sewer 4. Resolution 84-29 - Urging the Legislature to Adopt a Formula Funding Program for Municipal Assistance 5. Resolution 84-30 - Urging the.Legialature to Adopt the Revision of Title 29 6. Resolution 84-31 - Urging the Legislature to Adopt S8 417 Sub. on the Kenai River D. MINUTES None E. CORRESPONDENCE F. OLD BUSINESS V - - - -- -- JIF G. NEW BUSINESS 1. *Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. *Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. *Ordinance 920-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns by $68,555 In a New Capital Project Entitled "Comet Circle" 4. *Ordinance 921-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns by $1,500,000 in a New Capita'1 Project Entitled "FSS Facility" - Flight Service Facility 5. *Ordinance 922-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns by $80,000 In a New Capital Project "Community Center" 6. Lease Application - Tommy Partee - Tract A - Sprucewood i Glen Subdivision - Retail Mall 7. Discussion - Regency Pointe Assessment District - S. Discussion - Vacation of Utility Easement - Lots 10 & 11, Block 1, Kenai Peninsula Estates, Part Three 9. Discussion - Airport Terminal Requests 10. Discussion - Wince, Corthell, Bryson Claim - Forest & Gill 11. Discussion - Raven Transit Lease Amendment Request 12. *Games of Skill & Chance - Kenai Peninsula Home Builders Association H. REPORTS 1. City Manager N 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director - 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT op I I l . I ' 1, KENAI CITY CO11NrIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES MARCH 21, 1984, 71UO PM KENAI CITY A014INISIRATION BUILDING MAYOR TOM WAGONER PREStOING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL Presents Wagoner, Ackerly, Bailie, Hall, Measles, Monfor, Wise Abeents None A-1 Agenda Approval a. Masyor Wagoner asked that item B-3 should read "Automatic Teller Machines---" b. Mayor Wagoner asked that stem G-11, Raven Transit Lease, be omitted. C. Mayor Wagoner asked that item H-10, Community Center Report, be added. Council approved the agenda as changed and corrected. A-2 Consent Agenda MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to approve the Consent Agenda as eumbitted. MOTION, Amendment to Consent Agendas Councilman Wise moved to removed items G-4 and G-5 from the Consent Agenda. - No second or vote is required for removal from the Consent Agenda. VOTE, Consent Agendas Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 6-1 Clarence Ladd - Cleaning up Streets and Old Buildings in Old Kenai Clarence Ladd, Rox 1404, Kenai. The title wee misleading, he did not went the old buildings cleaned out, just the burned buildings. He distributed pictures of burned out buildings and parking congestion in Old Town. He explained, the Fire Chief said we have to get•permieston from the land owners to dispose of them. they are an eyesore and dengorouo, and should be removed. Main St. parking problem. Care are parked on both sides and it ►s difficult to drive through there. Patrons of the bars are parked there, there is also a safety concern. F►re trucks cannot get through. MOTIONS Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, for Administration to proceed under current established ordinance to remove the buildings. Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote. Clerk Whelan was asked to notify City Manager Brighton and ask that a report be given to Council. KENAI CITY COUNCIL ! I MARCH 21, 1984 Page 2 MOTIONs Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailin, to ban parking an Main St. between Spur and Cook. Councilman Wise requested that all those in the area be notified about the ordinance, let the people have a public hearing, have comments from the Police and fire depto. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. B-2 Bruce Robson, McLane - Section 36 Status Report They will submit the preliminary copy of the final plot at the April 4 meeting. They will go ahead with the administrative procedures at that time. The final filing w.11 be about April 15. They are working on the deotgn, it it, about 60% complete. They will submit to DEC next week. There should be total completion by May 15. They needs s. finalization of the name of the subdivision. They recommend either Rocky Point or Rocky Bluff. b. Street names. They have alpha and number now. They will need about 3-4 weeks from now. Councilman Ackerly , noted they should be careful on the size parcels due to awkwardness of development. Mr. Robson Geld they discussed ' getting into water & sewer in some areas. They did do preliminary costs. Some areas were broken down into smaller treetop that gives flexibility. MOTION: ' ti. Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, that the subdivision be celled Bluff, and name the atroeto after Alaska birds. Councilman Measlee asked if the Code deals with naming of streets. Public Works Director Kornelis replied, the only j thing they have is avenues, lonan and streets. There used ! to be a system, but it is no longer in effect. Councilwoman 1 Monfor recommended Rocky Point, it to the geographical 11 location where the Indiana went to get food for the winter. Bluff could be anywhere. MOTION, Amendments Councilwoman Monfor moved, neeonded by Councilman Wise, to emend the motion to Rocky Point. Mayor Wagoner suggested having a study, and have Land Manager Labehn bring back a report. VOTE, Amendment (Poseed)s Yess Wagoner, 0aslse, Measles, Monfor, Wise Not Ackerly, Hail MOTION, Postpones fI Councilman Ackerly moved to postpone action till the April 4 meeting. ! Motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Robson noted there is already a Rocky Point l subdivision. 1 `7" r 9ENAI city COoNCIL MAH1:11 21, 0114 Page 7 VOTE, Hut" Met ton no Amended (rut lud)I Yost wogunor Not Aekorly, Boiling Nall, Nasnlen, Monfort wine Mayor Wegener nskod Land Manager Lobnhn moat with PAZ to obtain recommendntlono far 2 tor 1 nnmeu for the anbdtviolon and Otranto, and have community involvement. Land Hansgor Lnbahn oatd it would he on the PAZ agenda. 0-1 Eddio turner, Penlnnulo Savings A Loan - Autemetic Taller Muchinen of Airport Mr. Turner introduced Hstel Hosth, Jonot Turner and Golan McCord of Peninsula Savings A Loan. Ho explained he woo requesting Alooko Option be put Into the airport terminal. It to good for tourists and rooidonts. It to almost imp000lhin to cash a check. there are 12 inotit,utions involved with this. 200,000 customoro In Alookal 47,000 cards outstanding - moot In Anchorage. They have 1) A1M'a in the State# 05,000 tranonotiono per month. They are joining with Instant Tollor network in the Western state@, Amorican Cxpraoo and National Network ants be used. The machine would be froo-otanding, would coot about $15,000, $10,000 to install. There would be 24 hour pot day access. Alooko Option card are offered by$ s. Peninsula Savings It. Alaska Statobank C. Alaska USA federal Credit Union Mayor wagoner said Administration has asked for a work ooalslon to discuss thin and other terminal appliuotlono. He promlood to get bock to Mr. Turner. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 917-04 - Amnndinq KHC - Preforonco to Purch000- Applications Over Loono-Applicatiuno in Selling City - Owned Lando NOTION$ Councilman Manatee moved, ascended by Councilwoman Bailin, to adopt the ordinance. thorn was no public comment. Not inn panood unanimaualy by roll coil veto. C-2 Resolution 04-27 - Sottinq a Onto of Public Hearing no the Propound Regency Points Aonenament District M0T 10:41 • Counctimnn Ackariy moved, noconded by Couneitmoo M000loo, to adopt the resolution. Thera woo no public comment. Motion pongryd by unanimous consent. C-1 Resolution 04-28 - Trunsfor of funds an NAP Project - Additionai Engtneprinq - b11i,162 n. McLane') Cofit Ent imale for Addit tonal 'work - Heq►c Avenue and Wafer h Sower a tiff. � A,. t KENAI CIIv COUNCIL NARC11 21, I'mot pogo 4 l N011fill I j f Cnunrllmon Nonolo" moved, aacondod by Coonaliwoman lioillo, to adopt the retail left loll. Pllilt 1 C CONNE N 11 Riek Baldwin, No to a ranidant, of the aroo of propnool, Thoro to a moms from Mr. Nul.nno in tho puuknt lend ho diotributod hto ftguroo thin (into, Ctoderetto and Princoon warn to be graveled. Thera woe a railuant for Magic elan. Nee liven an tho earner of halite need Prinueou, Sovorol of hill nolghborn gnkod for nee upgrode of Nferyio. Ro to not objocting to upgrading of Magic, Now thorn to a propoont for water A oewur to the grog. Now will that hoeeoflt tho pooplo thorn? Thoro Oro 24 atroeturoo thorn. Each Ono logo a well A septic Oyatum, NAot Oro About 10 yrO, Old Ond hove boon functioning. 9 fern owner-oucuptod. Thant) pooplo Choate to live to tin ieoletod area. Tito City ottould cheek to can if it to coot-offootive. Thin will benefit the land opeculatorn. Coot par landowner in $20#000, The ownero of I000ud tracto of land would be Ohio to gall off for profit, Oaforo tho City beriafito opootal peuplot thay Ohould attack if they want trio bona/it and if they would pay for it. Iho only way to do it in with an acnouoment diatt'tct, had to thio i0000 to Soction )6, Thore in a big block of land to too dovolopod. If tho City puroiato in oponing up land thoy will flood the area. Anyone coming in to Soation 36 could not mako on offer no good no they would if thero woo not no _ much land ovailablo, fine" thin got in tho ovorall Fine,? � The wator oltuatlon to nndr tho critical point to Iftomlloon Park. More pooplo would bo banefitud thorn. Thong pooplo. want fire protection and polloo protection, MOTIONe, Amondmentl Coueecilmon Nino mnvod, nocondnd by Councilman Ackorly, to nmond tho ru"ntution to change the amount from #19,000 to $9,100 and doloto "find water A oowor" (rum the 2nd porour"pit. VOTE, Amondmontl Motion 00000d unnnimoon ly by roll roll veto. VOTE., Moto Motion no Amundods Mai ton patented by unnnlmouo conoont. NCtAHE CONTRACTt N01ION I Counutimtin Ninv by Cauoutiwaman Onitle, to tourantee they Contract »tits 140.ano by $9,100, Nation panned by unfentmuuu eunuont, C-4 Ronolnf into 04-29 . lirglitel iho 1,n,li"lolore to Adopt to furnultr futediny Pragram for Nuntripot Anointonra N9119!i I Councilman M"notao muvnd, nnagndad by Counrilooman Honfor, to adopt the re,"Milt t"t+. /her" wet► nee pnblir "nmm"nt. . u�✓r..br. .. nfr .. ,tlJ,/... .. . .1 4!1r,.11 .. , . . • "IV.".", Kf,1iA1 I'tlY t;111INI'11. t1A11c11 21 , 1984 Page 5 Mayor Wogoner nuked Clark Wholon to diatributo to all togialolorro, file P,ovornor end Atronka Municipal Langan Office, C-5 Rooeletio►► 04-30 - Urainq ihRt Logialature to Adopt the Revtoton of Title 29 Nor TONS Councilman Ackerly mnvod, nucondod by Councilman M000loo, to adopt the renotution. There woo na public comment. Notion penned by unnnimnua connont. Mayor Wagoner ookod Clerk Wholnn to diotribut,o to all legialatora, the Governor and Alanku Municipal Lonquo office. C-6 R000lution 04-31 - Urging the Logtototure to Adopt 90-417 (Subatitute) an the Kona► River HOT ION► Councilman Ackoriy moved, nocondod by Councilman H000loo, to adopt the r000lution, PUBLIC CONMENTs Ruby Coyle, She in not oltp000d to the r000lution, but oho to concerned if anyono had neon the aubotituto no of now.. Many federal people that have regulatory authority over the Konat River went to the hearing. Nor concern fo, do we know whirt we are ondorotng^ Mayor Wagoner explained the committee can aubotituto o bill and oond it bock to the sonotn, they do not flow a to rend the original. (loth little aro in Sonata Roonurcoo Committee, Nro, Coyle naked if they eonniderad how much river they would take, Mayor Wagoner replied, (cam the bridge down, file bill oayo the City will control within the City, Mayor Wnqun©r than announced thia bill did proof) out of the flonourerf) Cofamttteo thin dale without amendmonta, tie will took P&I to prepare an ordtnoneo to govern the river within the City. John Williamo, Me wisntod to related Coullell that come time book tho City granted title to the Coyloo, They hnvo to legal claim to a portion of the river. They have a right to anchor their boot, Councilmen Wine Raked if, when a refiulution relating to a l.i►gsolative bill to in the packet, that Council have a copy of the bill included, NOTION, Amendments Caunatlmnn Wino moved, nocanded by Cnunctlwomato Ntoilie, to amend reference to Committ ile 5uhnl tf ut o 50-417 to rend CSSO-417, and eiui floe heading with the word "KIVER," VOTE# Amundmonf s Motion paooed unnnsm000ly by roll call vote. VOTE, Hain "ol inn :so Anondeds Hatton ptonned i►ntonueounly by roll rail vote, Cuunctl-ion Aloe wnro obnant for th,r vote. C KCNAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 21, 19114 poqu G Clark Whelan woo ankod to distribute to the Gavornor, the Loq►olotora from the Peninsula, the House Renoureoa Committee, the, Sonoto Rouourcua Committee, Roy Gilioepte in the Govornor'a office, Kenai Oorough Mayor and Soldotna Mayor. G-4 Ordinance 921-04 - Incronainrl Rev/Appno by $1,500,000 in a Now Capitol Project Entitled "FSS facility" NO1ION I Councilman M000loo moved, nocandod by Counottmen Hall, to introduce tlse ordinance. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Wioo moved, oocondod by Councilman Hall, to amend tho ordinance to rend, 2nd WHEREAS, "commitment by the City prop000l to limited to $1,500,000, and " Finance Director Brown explained, we could be committed to the oxcono, it: would be billed to FAA over a 20 year period. Tho amendment would not be correct. Atty. Rogere explotnod, FAA to committed to reimburse us between $150,000 and $200#0001 the upper limit could be $2 Million. Mr. Brown added, at this point we have limit by ordinance till we coma back to Council and addroosed the ordinance. Thio impcaoo a limit. Councilman Wtoe cold he would rather state that any excese would be roimburood to the City by FAA. We pruoumably would need supplemental appropriation to complete.', If we are golnq to•tho public Baying $1.5 Million and knowing we need more, we ore misleading the public. Mayor Wagoner acid it will not coot uu more than $1.5 Million, it will coot FAA. The rent to retmbursable. VOTE, Amendments Motion failed unanimously by roll cell veto. MOTION, Amendments Councilmen Wtoo movod, oecondod by Councilwoman Monfort to amend the ordinance, 3rd WHEREAS, add "FAA has ngroed" VOTE, Amendments Motion peened unanimously by roil call vote. VOTE, Mat" Notion oo Amondods Motion penned unnolmouoty by roll call vote. Councilman Wino uokod if there enold he a copy of the proponat in the next packet gild available to the proso. 0-5 Ordinance 922-04 - Increnninq Rev/Appna by $84t000 in a Now Capital Project "Community Center" NOTION$ Councilman Henislee moved, seconded by Councilwoman llailio, to introduce tho ordinance. Cnuncilman Wise amid title to premature. We have not selected the, note ur concopt of use fnaolity, We gre taking money from the library that was appropriated. We hovo an -� indication from the leglelgture that we will havu some money. it is also from the pollee addition. Ngyor Wngoner said the money allocation for library and police wao fur design only. This is ourplus. Councilman Ackerly said he ■ 1. .... • . . ,. ... _ .. . . 91:NAI CITY COONCIL MARCH 21, 19114 Tinge 7 thought that woo for furniture. Fin .DirA rown void if now furniture were ion inLogral port of construction it could he He added► he did not take all the money out of the acenunt, there will he about $10,000 left in each of the 2 funds sit addition to engineering dootgn. C0410Cilm811 Nine said even if we get State money for the library, it will not fund the type of otruetere the Library Commtantnn wnnto. 1401101y, Tablas Councilman Wise moved, noconded by Councilman Aekorty, to table the motion. VOTE, Table (failed)s Yes$ Ackorly► Wine Not Wagoner, Battle, till, Manatee, NenfOr VOTE (Paased)i Yens Wagoner, Ackerly, Rollie# 14011, Nosalea, Monfor Not Wine G-6 Lease Application - Partoo,Ttoct A,Sprueewood Glen S/0- 'Retail Mall MOTION$ Councilman Maoalea moved, oacended by Councilwoman 1181110, to approve the lease application. Councilman Ackerly asked if thin woo being submitted no a concept. Land Manager Lobohn replied, this is the complete application. Ono component not in the packet to the site plan. No reviewed thin. Councilman Ackerly naked Mr. Labahn if he and P&Z were sottofted with the landscaping. Mr. Lahohn replied moat of the tract will be parking. A 20 ft. Btlmlrirr-will be loft. Moot of the vegetation retained will be street right-of-way. Councilman Wine asked, what in the lease rate? Mr. i.abohn roplted, apprasoal has been ordered. Councilman Ackerly asked about the problem with the zero lot line. Mr. Lobohn rep!ie.:, it wilt canfocm- they have the right under the Code to ga to the lot lion, there will be a walk-through mall between, There to no access to Walker Lana. Councilman Wine asked if we are going to plat the extension of Tarn. Mr. Labahn replied, P&Z had a public huntinrt rogotding punching Torn through to Walker, thorn has been no action, Notion pono►td i►t►o►timoegly by roll call veto. G-j Oiaruoo►on . Rugancy Pointe Aaoeoument District Land Mitengor Labahn explained, toot fall there woo a diaenaa►on regardtaq Candlelight Dr. Ent. Council woo willinq in grant public line onaement to 0urnetto if there wort proper oppruval from the State, thin hen not happened. They have requeatud Uie City dedicate matching 30 ft. right-of-way eft W u►dsar. The deoignntion of parklands would he takoe out and the City would have to replaro. Mayor Naganer said when the Burnelto ram" to the Cott there, Wass dineuuaion of purgn►nq .u+ n+rrhnnge of property on parka vo other land. Mr. Labahn )aid we have had no reply fray the State. Mayor rlaquner aakn4 to tNava the m►nutve revtnAed regardtnq Ord. RIO. Mr. Labahn said we have Tade written appliCat ton for firtdinq of congt,►t.ency with the State and fvdotai gnvarnnento. The rLaf.e has not Convoyed to u) if they will ar.+•ept. There might t,r, a chance etnre Candlelight >A l KENAI 111V COUNCIL ! MAIICU 21, 19114 Page 8 watt an oxiating roodl but a 30 ft. match may not he acceptable, thorn in no oxtutintl rood. MOTION$ Councilwoman Onilto moved, nocondod by Councilwoman Monfor, that the partite involved in the Kugoncy Pointo 5/0 be reoponotblo for coot of oppretool, ourveying and platting on right -of -wily an City -owned lotion, PUBLIC COMMENTS Gill Burnett, Box 1022, Keont. At the loot mooting# the Council requested they upgrade Candlelight out of prtvnto funds lineation they wore the note beneficiary of the rood, even though the road has boon there many yearn. Accent; to by Linwood to the borrow alto, the other to Candlolight Ext. When they build Winduor Dr., it will accono uouth boundary of parklendo. Thin woo the basis for their roqueot for tho City to upgrade and provide a 30 ft. owsp. They are not oaking for the City to contribute to them, they are opening up lando. Mayor Wagoner void when they come to Council there woo dlocuoufon regarding future development. Council asked if there wee right-of-way on the other end. Burnetto snid it would be private and would not open. Mrs. Burnett replied# they cold they would not open loot your. At the time they opened up they would uoo Candlelight and it would not be ioolotsd. They void they would be back to Council when we were ready to open up. Mayor Wagoner void the City done not have it legal read on Candlelight Ext. Till we have pormlouton we cannot make a docialen. MOTION, Amendmenti Councilman Menoloe moved# nocondod by Councilmen Wiee, to amend the motion that the coat of opprainal, ourvoying and platting be split 50/50 with the land owner. Councilman Hoodoo nold if the government decldoo we can go ahead with Candlelight Ext. an a atroet and Windsor con bu put in with 30 ft, dedication Chia will eventually be City maintained otrueta. Councilman Wise ossd Wlndoor will open up parklundo. VOK, Amendment s Motion panned unanimaialy by roll cell veto. VOTE, Mntn Matron no Amendeds Motion punned unnntmously by roll call vote. MOTION$ .- Councilman Wine moved, occonded by Councilman tleaulea, to move in the oamo general ptat, 0010 Thin refera to platting replacement parkland#$ nas►erly of adjacunt to extst trig Parks rind Dec tract) Motion panned by onantme.te eortoenl. Mayer Wagonor rigid this nctton makes question 43 moot. finance Otreclor Drawn routed, rrtuarding Candlelight. The mottua made at the last meeting Ann not clear. to Caodlaltght added In the cool of the nune'isment dietrict+ � Council agreed that it woe. - I ��._xcr ..:• s.. r-'ter_ . KENAI I'Ify COUNCIL MARrl4 21, 19114 Pago `J — 0-0 Qiocuualon - Vocation of Utility Enuemunt - Kenai Poninauln Entaten "Of ION I Councilman Nieo moved, oocondod by Councilwoman Monfor, to approve the vacation. Motion pnoaed by unanimouo conoont. 1 0-9 Otacunnion - Airport Terminal Requooto Mayor Wagoner requeatod thin Item be postponed for a work neanion. Councilmen Uirie naked the Admits list ration recommend what facilitiao will be In the airport and what remodolinq will be done. Mayor wagoner noted this woo in the packet moterial. Council agreed to a work nooaion Nednoodoy, Mareh 20 at -- 7100 PM in the airport terminal. - N. REPORTS H-1 City manager None I ,. H-2 Attorney �•-• Nona •�• 11.3 Mayor -- Mayor Wagoner opoko. ` a. Na hoe appointed Councilwomen Rollie oo ad hoc member of the Mayors Council on Aging. 4 Ile will he meeting with City Manager Brighton and Ally. Roqoro to ro-work the Counetl on Aging, By -lawn, etc. Is. No naked Council to review the letter regarding the f-ngtor purchnn::, and they will review at the April 4 meeting. w.' 11-2 Attorneyro Report, Continued% ` Atty. Rogers; wan naked about re -hire. He replied he will into proviaao nppropriatod foisdo to extend Margaret d:: flentoucher'a contract, rho will come back for SO doyo or more, eenault usg moneyo will Ire stoodfor the balance after • the 30 dayn. 1 H-4 City Clerk • j -- - Norw H-5 rinonr.rr director None H-6 Planning b Zoning i1- Councilmen Aloe nail there will be a public hoarinq on the zoning urdinanre next wreak. (Hotels 26) H•7 Harbor Comminoinn %one v •.�. � r.r.��, Mom,.. ..��.. I f 1 � Y f i I I 1 f • 7—" i<Y.11AT Clly CMINCt1. MARCiI Z1, 1911r► Nape lb H-0 Reerenfinn Commina►on Rneroation 01raetor t1r•,P,ttltveay upnk,,. o, The Crookarka w►o notentory ine,lod,,dt. rfIf" wiflltod thin diutributotBeaver to C ot►na i 1 , b, Tile oki trail eonotructod by Carl Von Ouokork, the it bruuh woo aloarod find the along or,, up. noxt year. He auggent"d fi lottor of apprurlation bO vent to him. tlo will aloe have thin add,,d to the parka inventory. 11.9 Library Comminaion Mono H-10 Community Cantor Committee Councilwoman Bettie apoke. The minutoo are in the packet. A formal prOOOOtotlon wilt be at the April to meeting. The ittwill beO17h0 Oooq©nftek PfOOnoptoroowroom,t7,500wog4 ft, would for 500 people at a aft -down dinner. Before they decide on a daaton, they would like the committee to go to Sitka, laldez and mombi)ro, ,1,00all for Their noxtrmeeting toeAprildcOu"cil to approve It, Finance Otroctor Brown naid thoro are !undo available in the Looiniotivo account, 1401041 Councilman Neaaloo moved, a000nded by Councilwoman Honfor, to approve the roquo9t, motion panned unonimounly by roll call vote. 1, pERf;gfj pRESEgi tiol 5CREOIfL/.l) 10 OE HEART) o. Councilmon Aekerly oxproound npprooialion to Land Manager Labobn for the draft land once pracaduro fn the packet. Or. Labahn explained tbio io the "rut draft. b, Cototbor►ofrmetoNallon naPublic alea gNorkow0irucLor Kornolto replhen will Wif Otsct {tad# they Oro swoop u►o the airport, then they will do the at roof to, o, Cnunatimt►n Htee '►aid he will be in Junont► 'Wild, ragardtng lift" 29, 04orch 20) d, Mayor Wagoner natd the ,W teem,, to Konfit" oign ban b,,en alartw,d, Wit will geed It purmtt from the State, The Gordon C►ah will londna"Wu Oraund it. e, Counctiwnmen Nnnfor rioted to reviewing the parka report. obe did fiat Y.now wa had ouch gan4 pork factltt►9a, A.t r►beuld Iel new people know about the parka. AOJOURti"ClO 1 Ilget tr,q n4psirned at 9$ y5 W4, rriI lift r -`-`a•'lllfi, - ___-_—T.........-....'...ova. - __t_J�. _.. __ _ -__�� G __ _ _ — _- _ HILL 111EFFIF.LI), GOVERNOR 0 i►1 Ivf.41V 11FAI.TII ANib hilll.'IA1. hi1;11VA4'1';M POUCH Hoop 1 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99011 " OFFICBOPALWHOLiSMAND DRUG ABUSE PHBW 586-6201 March 22, 1984 23`4,% Tom 6lagoner, Mayor 414, Ci ty of Kenai 1*98, 210 Fidalgo ��, •., Kenai, Alaska 99611 !o`e �,�g4�1< Dear Mayor Wagoner: �,u/ Recently, there has been a heightened awareness statewide of the negative social and economic cost to all Alaskans from the abuse of alcohol. Histori- cally, the State has been responsible for the primary funding of alcoholism services. However, given the latest projections for population and economic growth there may not be enough State revenue in the future to meet the need. • �---'As the scope of alcohol related problems continue to increase, local govern- ments may need to provide added financial support for alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services. The legislature has recently provided an effective mechanism for local generation of revenue that may support alcoholism pro- grams in Title 04 (enclosed). It allows for the establishment of local tax- ation on alcoholic beverages sold in your area. Due to the large volume of alcohol sold in Alaska, a minimal tax rate of 3 to 4 percent would generate substantial revenue at the focal level that could be used to offset the state's decreasing financial participation. I feel that the existing alcohol programs in the state have shown that they are cost-effective in saving the even greater costs of incarceration, family assistance, and health care, that result from alcohol abuse. Continued sup- port at appropriate funding levels will be necessary to help maintain an improved Alaskan lifestyle as well. I am also including an article describing San Diego County's successful ef- forts in using local tax to support programs and as a preventive measure. This seems to be a logical and uncomplicated way of putting the burden of support for needed programs on those primarily responsible for them through their consumption. Our office wi11 be happy to answer any quests ons you may have, or to offer you any assistance you may require. Please feel free to contact our office at any time. Enclosures Sincerely, t atthew C. Felix Coordinator f r...�r . DICK MUELLER BROKER � Dick 1.,,00 TRADING BAY RD., SUITE 1 Mueller KENAI, AK 00611® Realty 007-203.6686 0=0011 r �)283,0888 100 TRADING OAY RD. March 19, 1954 . BUS, ® 007-203.4033 HOME SUITE 1 KENAI, AK 00811 tr.' CC 1 City of Kenai Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager 210 Fidalgo Ave b�''-ti%1%•�'� Kenai, Ak. 99611 Dear Mr, Brightons I have listed and am authorized to offer to the City of Kenai the 159.32 acre parcel legally doocribod arts SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER(SW4) of Section 29, townehi.p Six(6) North, Range Eleven(ii) West, Seward Meridians which lids adjacent to the ' airport fence in the area of the prop000d float plane baoin. , The offered price is $3,500.00 per acre for a total price of $557,620 D0. ' Thies parcel is owned by Wildwood D©volopment Company and sale is subject to approval of 67% of the atockholdoro of the company. � I am aware of the appraisal done by tho city loot year and believe I can prove more value than shown on that appraisal. 1 Also, according to Mr. tower, who in one of the otockholdora, much of what appearo to bo wetlando in only surface wet with 4 gravel or sand under 6 inches to a foot; of peat and topsail. Thank you, Richard R. Mueller, t3.R.I., C.R.: firriker/owner RHMs njm r. FA4HY.NTO OVRR 01,000.00 W111CR NY.Y,O COUNCIL APPROVAL OR RATIVICA1I011 4/4/84 lIN1R SC 10I .I O :Y 'l' P, CCOtI iT Pa 0 ,il OU iO FOR AFYRO AL1 TAME Analysis b Design study CF-1larbor 0tudy Y.nginooring 0,030.00 !t r ` 1 FOR RATIFICATSONs III; Blue Cross March Medical Ins. Variouo Health Insurance 17,134.52 National Bank of Alaska March Fedoras W/H General Fund Varioua 43,182.16 C A.m.B.F.C.u. Web Credit Union WIN Various Liability 16,748,00 ICMA Retirement Employees Contribution Various Liability 3,802.00 Womenoa Resource Center February Child Care Womon's Resource Accounts Receivable 9,172.24 Walters b Olson mine. City Insurance Hon-Dopartmontal Insurance 5,527.00 union Oil Co. Feb. Natural Gas Trust•b Agency in Trust 12,023.33 i marathon Oil Co. Feb. Natural Gos Trust 6 Agony In Trust • 12,028.60 Glacier seats Horeb Phone service Various Communications 2,510.82 F{ RUSCO March Natural 049 Usage Various utilities 3,247.26 First Federal Bank REPO 3/21/84 Central Treasury Central Traosury $50,000.00 Iot. 9.833 c REPO 3/29/84 Central Trosoury Control Treasury 350,000,00 into 9.974x National Bank of Alaska Treasury Bill 3/30/64 Control Treasury Central Treasury 20004,232#62 Int.10o43811 f 19 J li�yj f PURCHASE ORDER CITY of KENAI F ENDOR210 FIDALGO ST. PHONE 283.7538 Op • ACCOUNTINGa ACCOUNTING KENAIt ALASKA 00611 BLUE • SHIPPING 6 RECEIVING REEN • APPROVED COPY PINK • REQUISITIONER VENDOR NO, r Air Tok TO Ordorod by - Date Contact , Phone' J SHIP VIAL Poo QY ForJAWFOUCray oo�vAY SHIPPING •CHARGE rtt,uiK� iu� PURCIIASESAUT"01111,EDONIV WHEN51ONEDABOVI BY SEPARATE ON INVAICE THE. FINANCE DIRECTOR OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENI ITEMNO. 0EECRIP110NORARTICl4 "fo UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Repair of Street Lights eat. 8 lights 8 so 150.00 $1v200.O 8 handhold electrical water- 8 so 50.00 400.0 tight splices: Handhold for Pole No. 68 1 as 100.00 10Q.0 �IMIt, P� UBG►1Aaf. C)Rpik NI)MBfI' MUST APPIAR AN All PACKAGH AND PAPfR5 ktIATING 10 TI115 PUR CHASE No. Le q 04 Invoice to be at labor $34.50/hr plus cost of material x 195 on coat of materials Bucket truck a $25/hr4 Truck or van o $30/0 0^r STATEMENT BELOW READ 00 MAILED TO VENDOR. PO is for all cost & freight to Kenai 'Freight for this PO is on PC# lff ADDITIONAL COSTS WILL BE PAID"VMOUT TOFAL $1,700.0 AUTHORIZATION & NEW PO PRIOR TO DELIVERY. 601-43150-45 Av"'e .�.aVNt/� DEPARTMENT a BY MAW . I MgUIDIT10110 OUR 01,000.00 MUCH SUBU CODUCU, APPROVAL 4/4/04 VY�1USR s 1Q1 .1a DUARTHWITra:use!br.._�.�- Awnutrr_� Alaska Rubber 6 Supply Conveyor Bolt factor Treatment Nachinary b kquipment 2,150.00 r Cook Inlet Motors Rapolro to police Vehicle Police Repair 6 Haintenanea 1,011,00 Nertig, Rhodosp P,tc, legal, pans Rat Cook Inlet pet. Attorney Professional Bsrvices 5,206,08 Attorneys Rensi Steel Buildings Install Bteel Door in Storaga PR -police Repair 6 Haintonencs 1,910,00 Building Peninsula last. of Voiding Melding Courson for Some Shop Miscellaneous 1,375.00 i . J . e g4 t� Sufj�jontod bys Adminintration f i CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 923-04 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1983-84 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $1,500 AS A RESULT OF AN INSTITUTION LIBRARY SERVICE GRANT FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has received an Institution library Service Grant in the amount of $1,500 from the State of Alaska for providing library services to the Wildwood Correctional Center. NOWO THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be modes General Fund `increastimated Revenueas State Library Grants OO Increase Appropriations: Library -Salaries $ 500 Library -Books 1 000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day 4' .... of April, 1984. l OM V GONER, MAY611 ATTESTS anel Whelang t; i t y MR Firat Reifcisngs April 49 1964 Second Reading: April 18, 1984 Effective Dates April 18, 1984 Approved by Finmce: a 94 Sugquated bys Admtnifit rat ion CITY OF KENAI ` 6 ORDINANCE NO. 924-64 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA .- ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND ENTITLED "REGENCY POINTE", r. AND AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATION FOR THE PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF s $310,0OA. "s WHEREAS, the City hna been petitioned to establish an assessment i district in the proposed Regency Pointe Subdivision in Kenai, and � WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the project with a sale of special assessment bonde, which have been approved by the voters of Kenai, at it later date, and WHEREAS, interest on monies used for construction of the project prior to the cola of bonds in to be a coat of the project, in , accordance with KMC 16.05.050. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11 ORDAINED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that s ' Section 1s A spacial oaaaaament fund for the construction of Roqency Pointe be established. Section 2s Appropriation, on a project basis# be authorized, no fo 1 owe s Res one Pointe s cmin if ra son $ 500 Engineering 229500 Ingpect ton 220500 Construction 230,000 Contingency 34,500 [ tl PASSED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of April, 1984. T014 WAGONER, R ATTESTS one he sin, City Clark First Readings April 4, 1984 Socond Readings April 18, 1904 Eff'crtivrs Dates April 18, 1984 Approved by Finances C 4 CITY OF KENAI %OIC e� of 4"„ 210 ROALOO KENAI, ALASKA "811 TELEPHONE 283. 7635 April 4, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor Tom Wagoner, Kenai City Councilmembers FROMs eff Labahn, Land Manager SUBJECTS Ordinance 925-849 Deletion of Maximum Height Requirement The proposed Kenai Zoning Code contains a section regarding maximum height requirements. The last paragraph on page 52 references a map entitled "Obstruction Criteria" which is on file with the City Clerk. This map is no longer on file with the City of Kenai. Instead the persons developinq prcperty on or in the vicinity of the Kenai Municipal Airport are advised to submit'FAA form 7460-1 to the Federal Aviation Administration for their approval regarding height restrictions. Recommendations Amend Ordinance 925.84 to delete the maximum height section within the "Additional Requirements" table found on page 52. JL/kh r, �sis�.. ._ --- = —� _ "��,----T•x� ram,.=—�—=i�r'�r�(s�it'�isuir� ... Suggnotnd bys Adminintrotion C CITY OF KENAI f ORDINANCE N0, 925-84 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL. OF THE. CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, t ESTA81.1511ING A NEW SECTION W1111IN T111.E 14 OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "KENAI ZONING CODE." WHEREAS, the Council has adopted Resolution 84-1 in which the r Borough was requested to delegate the zoning power to the City of Kenai, and !� WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission has prepared and recommended n Kenai Zoning Coda to be established no a new section within the Kenai Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, the City requests that this Kenai Zoning Code replace tho existing Borough zoning ordinance for the City of Kenai effective July 11 1984, , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,aa followes Section 1s The Kenai Municipal Code is hereby emended to f add a new Chapter 14.20 entitled "Kenai Zoning Code" as exhibited ; so Attachment "A", Section 21 That said Chapter shall not recognize or authorize any lend use or activity not currently permitted under Kenai Peninsula Borough Code of Ordinancea, Chapter 21.76. 1 Sect Ion 31 KMC 14.20 shall become effective July 11, 19849 or as susn thereafter upon delegation of the zoning power by the Borough Assembly, PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thin 1Oth day of April, 1984, ATrESTs 3—anoUT17flan, Tity Clark First Roadinsis April 4, 1984 Second Readings April 10, 1984 Effactive Dates May 181, 1984 r MEMORANDUM TA$ Kenai City Council FROMs Jeff Labohn, Lend Manager SUBJECTs Kenai Zoning Code DATES March 29, 1984 CITY OF KENAI iwwei4" 210 PIDAL00 KENAI, ALABKA 00011 TBLCPNON2203.7686 The Kenai Advisory Planning h Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Kenai Zoning Code at their meeting of March 26, 1984. No written or oral testimony woo presented to the Commission. By unanimous vote, the Commission recommended approval of the draft Kenai Zoning Code to the Council The Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission held several work 9easiono regarding the proposed Kenai Zoning Code. Although changes woes made in format and organization to improve the readability of tho Code, no substantial amendments were made to existing Kenai Zoning Code (pr000ntly a Borough ordinance), A croon -reference tablet documenting the proposed changes, is provided for your reference. The following actions must occur prior to the delegation of the zoning power to the City from the Borough an of July 1, 1984. 1) introduction and ennctment of the Kenai Zoning Code (Ordinnnee 925-84) by the Council J.o become effective July 1, 2) Introduction and enactment of an ordinance by the Borough Assembly, upon recommendation of the Borough Planning Commission, tos 1 J I d r a. Dolognto the zoning power to the City of Kenai b. Delete Chapter 21.76. (oxiatinq zoning code) froin the Borough Code of prdi.nsnco© i Effective dnte of this ordinance to be July 1. 2 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOCIA-FES KCNAI P11n1J1:9910NAL HUILMNO 200 WILLOW 4TNLBT, WITC 201 MAILING A©ORUM 11.0, HOX 4400. KCNAI, ALAOKA 99011 T C LC PHON I: 19011 20 J•0024 lbrch 29, 1984 r Keith Kornelis, P.E. +%'Aft 1084 Director of Public Works City of Xonai tonal P.O. Box 584 �'=':;:� !'�orlc4 DapL Kenai, Alaska 99611 ; RE: Proposal for Additional Services Kenai Airport Projects Dear Keith: Pursuant to our contract dated September 22, 1983, we respectfully submit the following request for additional fees required to complete the project based upon your requested changes. The proposed changes cover three (3) basic items Asted below with the related fees assigned to each item. Item 1. We have been requested to prepare the necessary dowments to exren'n the scope of the Itinerant Parking project. The required effort would entail additional soils exploration, survey, design of the addition, additions and,deletions to the existing =tract doclanents, contractor coordination, inspection and testing. The proposed fees are as follows: Principal Manager 40 MH @ $ 67.48 $2699.20 Staff Engineer 64 MH @ 57.84 3701.76 Geologist 32 MH @ 67.48 2159.36 Senior Technician 40 MH @ 48.20 1928.00 Computations 4 MI @ 83.00 332.00 Clerical 32 MH @ 24.09 770.88 3-Man Survey Crew 8 Hr @ 125.00 1000.00 Drilling L.S. 1000.00 Lab tests L.S. 500.00 Electrical Fngincer 24 Hr @ 75.00 1000.00 Total $15, 891.20 Item 2. The intent of the proposal and our subsequent contract was to pr`oviae for continuous inspection for the duration of the construction Y � ..� IT, f March 29, 1984 Pagc� 2 Keith Kornolis, P.E. contracts based upon the assumption that the construction contracts, both for the vehicle parking and the airport itinerant parking projects, were accaaplishad concurrently. As you are aware, the projects are presently out of sequence and in order to provide for contim ous inspec- tion, additional inspection fees are required. The contract project managment and testing will remain unchanged. Senior Technician 180 MH @ $48.20 $8676.00 The above is based upon the assumption that the two (2) construction contracts remain out of sequence. Of course, if the projects' spring j schedule is such that they are accanplisbed within the contract time allo=ce, than some of the specified additional fees will not be re- quired. On the other mend, if the two (2) contracts get further out of concurrent sequence, then fees in excess of those herein stipulated will be required. Item 3. In reference to the proposed Change Order Nwber 1, the fuel c systems, if the Change Order can be processed so that the work is acoar�liebed under the project time frame then no additional fees are required. It is our understanding that Zia owner will provide for technical inspection of the man echical portions to the Change Order and that we will be responsble for testing and inspection of the civil por- tions of the Change Order. No additional fees. In sunnary, we respectfully request an extonsion-to our contract of $24,567.20. If you have any questions regarding this subad.ttal or if anything needs clari- fying, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, deny Silvers, P.E. Project Manager QJSsbb Y4 rr1/141�1 APorMOVHD mr am o? "Mt MAW i IY I 0 GO a,� (a) Shall not exceed one hundred twenty degrees Fahrenheit (120°F) in temperature at the point of delivery. (f) Shall be commercially free from dust, gums, gum forming constituents, or other liquid or solid matter which might become separated from the gas in the course of transportation through pipelines. 3. All units of measurements of gas required in this Article X. shall be at a temperature of sixty degrees Fahrenheit (60°F) and at an abso- lute pressure of fourteen and sixty-five hundredths (14.65) pounds per square Inch. 4. Buyer shall have the right to refuse to accept delivery of any and all gas which fails to meet the quality requirements of this Article X. XI. PR, ICE 1. The amount to be paid by Buyer to Seller for gas delivered to Buyer hereunder shall be as follows: (a) Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2 below,-the-baose W;,4,.to*bt,P#Jd ;bY%8MAP tOO96116eir j� for. gas d�,YZrjgj1?.%j.f!pr�. hereunder 9baMvba%$&a?rper;4gcf. (b) As adjusted pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 2 below there shall be added to the base price a premium deliver - ability charge 9f a"4#6Pf*f'f6l V11-gas .dRt i,$Vd-during• the ,,Xear� 1986.-and thereafter,,durfng•-,the-term-hereof-Ato-the• extent thax,.5e11errremains -commltted..to,,de,,verateAbnnual COO tract Quantities end -maintains -the •abiIIty•to-detrvwer, year by year;-at-Olno'fdFtd;?"-5f'2:S'or more -during years"1986-throubh j 989-, 2.25 or -more =duri ng - the , -year 19Wand 2.0 or Zre�dich -year „ thereafter. For pur;oses.hareof the. term ."swing -factorl-shall -24- mean the ra�japubtained:by-dividing-Sal )or's -del ivrry.•capacity, by the 0,41)y ;contract:..quantity where the "ddWy.contract !quantity" is the..AnpualTContracVQuantJty divided by phreo-hundred-sixty-five -,... (1365.). The Annual *Contract:,Quant;i.ty.•util ized -shall be that f4ps,62e4 a�propraato .yoar•as,,,set ifor, b,inzNragraph-:1.•of4rticla :V.,A.gf.,xtp date Nelreof. Notwithstanding other provisions hereof said Quantity(s) shall for the purposes of this Paragraph l(b) remain unchanged except for those prov ed,. :a,r,Agaaph, Ufa„Ar1.. pragLjpfL* 2 and 3 of Article V. ' 2. It is expressly understood and agreed between the parties that the base price and premium deliverability charge provided for in Paragraphs l(a) and l(h) shall be adjusted annually as follows: Effective January 1, 1984, and on January 1 of each year ,nere- after during the term this Agreement is in effect, the base price and premium deliverability charge shall be adjusted by multipljing said base price and premium deliveravility charge by the following ratio: The Posted Price of No. 2 Fuel Oil on the applicable January 1 divided by the Posted Price of No. 2 Fuel Oil on January 1, 1983. The term Posted Price shall mean the posted price of No. 2 Fuel Oil FOB Tesoro Refinery, J1ikiski, Alaska. In the event that there ceases to be a posted price for No:'2 Fudt Oil at Tesoro's Refinery at NiM ski, postings for No. 2 FuQ1 0il as published in Platt's Oilgram (or another mutually agreed upon publication in the event P1att"s 0i19ram discontinues publishing such quotes) FOB refineries at or near Seattle, Washington, shall he substituted in the ratio described above. -25- w a quantity of gas which is at lea5t equal to the Annual Contract Quantity shown in the following schedule: Annual Contract Quantity Swing Rate Year Mcf Mcf per da J 1983 8,000,000 26,000 1984 9,000,000 32,000 1985 91000,000 35,000 19(i6 4f4r000;0001 WW1WT000.4 1987 14,000000 110,000 1988 15,000:000 120,000 1989 16,000,000 130,000 1990 18,000,000 133,000 1991 19,000,000 130,000 1992 19,000,000 130,000 1993 27.000,000 125,000 1994 27, 000,000 1160000 1995 27,000,000 950000 1996 16,000,000 60,000 1997 12,000,000 35,000 Total Contract Quantity 250,000,000 MOO The gas to be d,,livered by Seller hereunder at any time and from time to time may, at Seller's option, be delivered from Seller's gas reserves underlying the leases covered hereby within the (a) the Kenai Unit Area, (b) the Beaver Creek Unit Area, or (c) the Trading Bay Unit Area ("Unit Areas"), or any combination thereof. In order to enable Buyer to develop hardware require- ments for each Unit Area, Seller will cooperate with Byyer"6y providing on March 1, 1983, and on January 1 of each year thereafter a written 2-year development plan for each Unit Area. / 2. The Total Contract Quantity, the Annual Contract Quantities and the Swing Rates set forth in Paragraph 1 of Article V hereof shall be reduced whenever and to the extent that any Lessor or Lessors within the Kenai Unit Area, the Beaver Creek Unit Area or the Trading Bay Unit Area shall exercise partially or wholly any right to take in kind itsshare of royalty gas attributable to Seller's leaseholds and/or lands covered by this Agreer'ent. -10- F I As,.�of 'r trr ny 1•�of�tttle-following°year-the Annual -Xon trarA Quenti-ty(s)..s.hat1,be••the -.iden ti fied lower •annual -con traet•quanti.ty(s•)•-as set 4Kth,:4n•,the;hereinabove mentioned notice fFoin;Buygr;•provide'd;,'however, in Fpnsideration of the relief provided•.by. Sel,ler..to Buyer.... Buyer. -agrees; ­to• pay -to -Seller for. all gas . -delivered a premi um,on ,the then..adjusted-applicable gas �pr-ice,.including any premium deliverabilit;determined tby:Articia.-M as follows: if the Annual Contract The Adjusted Applicable Price Quantity is Reduced per MCF Shall be Increased By From To �° •�iaBO Yorw+t ess . 6'� more than 10. -` 90.0% or less . 12.6% more than 20.0% 30.0% or less -21.4% Thereafter, the Total Contract Quantity will be irrevocably re- duced by an amount equal to the difference between the scheduled quanti`y(s) and sucl. Is,er annual contract quantity(s) ("released quantity(s)") and Seller shall have the right to commit and deriver all or any portion of such released quantity(s) for Seller's own use or to'any other purchaser. j I+4e334c.haa�.aat. Gamai ttedZ.uch•�1,eased.quanti ty4s4-4o.4ts own...usn..or.-.another-purchaser.,.Sel4er-shala-�have-the-•night-and-opt4on"tb extend •. ,the. term -of-this• Agreement•by recommitting .such quantity(s)-to-Buyer, -ioclud- f.ng .a -Swing -Rate which;• when,.divided by.,the daUy-average .of -the •quanUty-•to• be.,delivered each •year., ,yield!LA-ratio-of•-iI,33;-otherwise•,upod-the wine tbrms an dN,condjtlons..setJor..th.,.berein,..provided.Seller-gives4uyer-written-Wotice thcpe.43•)-yeiIr; pricr'"tb-`the-•end-bf- the -term -of, -this -•Agreement. j`+P,during 'th'e •te-rmi 'i-ereof-Buyer elecis"to"reduce the*Anhual Contract Quantitj'as•set forth hereinabove, Buyer agrees to concUiftntly-Wduce io_the same proportion the Annual -Contract Quantity as-to-all•-other-contractso entered into by Buyer after November 1, 1922. Buyer also agrees to take gas ratably, in so far as operationally possible from all others supplying gas to Buyer during said year(s). For the purposes hereof the term ratably shall -12- I on. Cam, -to �47771, There is a time to laugh and a time to cry - a time to buy and a time to sell. Now can one deal with suciecomprebensive question and arrive at a simple answer that can be stated in few words: By knowing all the facts, weighing the alternative, logically considering the unknown elements of the situation, season these with common sense and arrive at the bottom line; a yes or no answer. Generally speaking, the City/KUSCO relationship has served the City well if all the good and bad Is weighed. It has not been overly detrimental to ENSTAR (ANG), over the years - what is the accumulation of 1,600 customers over two decades compared to their growth rate. I do think the presence of that relatively small competitive factor ban served all of the south central customers, especially the other Peninsula customers, in a meaningful way. The gas supplier (Union/ Marathon), has not been economically disadvantaged by the low cost contract - in view of comparable agreements between Standard Oil and Chugach Electric at Beluga. Union, has had the additional expense of cleaning the gas and transpor- tation charges, but in a sense it was only a trickle of that passing through for other purposes. The additional taps in their transmission line greatly aided the City/KUSCO, by economically serving a greater area and did not prove to be as harmful, from a regulation stand point, as at first feared by the supplier. If I might add a point here, since I have nothing to gain or lose as a result - Union Oil/Marathon Oil have proved to be very good neighbors and citizens of the City of Kenai. They well deserve to be offered the proffered hand of cooperation rather titan the sometimes unjustified opposition and restrictions evidenced at times in the post. The public welfare and common good must be protected but be fair and reasonable. May 1 ottagest what I think is the best solution at this time. Endorse the sale of KUSCO to ENSTAR. There is undoubtedly some going concern value, blue sky or appreciation, whatever you might call it. In other words the selling price is somewhat greater than the depreciated book value of the assets, but moderate, considering the inflationary trend of the past several years. This is a small concession to KUSCO in return for a job well done. Allow RNSTAR to step into the cities position no Yegards the gas supply contract for the short remnining period. This will make it easier to reach an acceptable transfer and resolution of rate structure with the Alaska Public Utility Commission, (APUC), who is the final decision maker in the whole process. 1 a A - Page 2 . In concluaion - it is timely for thin to happen, ENSTAR (ANG), boo a proven ' track record of good reliable service. Most important, the City will be assured of uninterupted service - due to gas contracts already negotiated between suppliers and ENSTAR. APUC will, by State law, continue to be the regulating entity representing the public interest for the consumar. 1 The City at one time owned Ito own electric utility. It served its purpose and has long since passed Into quasi-privato bonds, i.e., Nomor Electric Corporation. The time to at hand for the City to remove itself completely from the gas utility as well. I had a little to do with the City's involvmant in both cases. As both a continuing customer of the utilities and city tax payer, I foci entitled to remain somewhat involved. Government should only be involved In providing the common needs of the citizens when and vhere private enterprise cannot or will not meet those needs in tho . public's best interest. Then, and only then; and only until private anterpriso can and will step in to supply those needs, in an acceptable manner. This letter to in response to a number of requests for my opinion or in some cases regarding my recollection of various specific aspects of the agreements reached years back. My opinion is worth no more, nor no less, than any other interested person. I have not been persuaded by any party involved to sway opinion or try to influence "I aqy decisions. My heart is still with the City of Kenai in particular and the i entire Peninsula as a whole. If this latter seems presumptious on my part - ((y , it's not intended that way. r} 0 JAMES G. DYE 2301 Louseae Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99503 i; f . KENAI UTILITY SERVICE CORPORATION P.0, BOX W KENAI, ALA.`iKA 09011 March 27, 1994 PIIUNF 203.7032 AF111A CODE,001 Mr. Tim Rogors, City Attornoy City of Kenai P. O. pox 500 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Tim, Reference is made to your letter of March 12, 1984 requanting a 60-day extension to the option period the City of Kenai enjoys in connection with the purchase of thin company's annots. I have diocuoead the matter with the KUSCO oharoholdorn an well as with Dick Barnes of LNSTAR and the following issue were brought to lightr 1. The timo-value of the money involved would create a loan of some $27,500.00, conoorvatively oetimated, to the owners of the KUSCO assets. 2. Zt would not be in the public interest to delay tho determination of rooponoibility for the 1984 conatrue- tion season. 3. If ENSTAR is to aoaumo the rosponuibility for the KUSCO operation they much profor to have the transition wall under way prior to my scheduled departure dato of April 30. 4. To the beat of our knowledge the City of Kenai will have had adequate time prior to the deadline of April 15 to auaombio and evaluate any information required to roach a decision. Certainly, no roquosto for informational data have boon made of us oinco tho vioit made to our office by your conoultants on March 14. For the reasons cited above wo fool that we cannot honor your request for the extension and ouggont that the City's option ba handled in the mannor provided for in our Franchino Agroomont. Sincerely, KENAI UTILITY SERVICE CORPOKATION Oocar L. Thomao, Vice Proaidont OLT/rlw Rr '1' 40 (,1,, 4t� �ry00 6alU 4 ' ' Anchorage Daily News Thursday, March 29, 1984 Ens-Vocar parent s8m8kcs buywoors '• From slall and wire servieo reports line pro eat linking the Balu• company, owns 8.4 percent of ,,,,-f .r�: a•,. • , i Directors of Enstar Corp. are putting the companyy up so gas liould on the west side of Cook Inlet to Anchorage its stock. "We had hoped that our for sale, and local officials via the Matanuska Valley is proposal to Mr. Huffington say they are unsure of how more than 80 percent cam• would persuade him that a • that might affect Enstar Not. ural One Co., which delivers plate. And Enstar recently re• ceived regulatory approval to proxy tight is unnecessary, Enstar board Chairman 0. natural Safi to more than 61,• introdueo natural nos distri• Charles Honig said. "in any 000 customers In the Anchor• button to Palmer and Wasilfa case, we feel It is important Ago area, residents this summer. that Mr. Huffington not be "We're not speculating now Asked how sale of the.par• ant company might affect the given control of the company while the sale process is going _ becauseWe' we just don't know," local Enstar spokesman Dan Dieekgraelf Wednesday local utility's planned acquisl• o� naQevfc �tA andextension Mvnlley, on," itr said dent andtreasurer of f:�nstar afternoon. •. Dleckgrueff said, "we have no Natural Otis Co,, said Enstar Enstar Natural One Co, in a idea what affect It will have Corp. has hired a firm to help i division of Enstar Corp„ a on anythIn at this point in with the proposed sale, But diversified energy concern time, It's just too early to he added that he didn't know have been discus• t based in Houston, Faced with know," if there any a hostile takeover attempt, Enstar Corp. directors siona with prospective buy. Enstar Corp. announced made the decision to sell after ere. Wednesday that it is seeking the company's largest share. Enstar Natural Gas started ' buyers, holder rejected a proposal delivering gas here in 1062 r Enstar last month agreed to pay $2,4 million for KUS- that would have required him temporarily to stop efforts to and was known until mid• 1982 as Alaska Gas and Serv- 1 CO, a small utility that deliv :' ^', •p•n:, ors natural gas in the City of gain control of the company. Enstar Corp, stock is vat. ice Co, Enstar Natural Gas am. Kenai. But the transaction ued at $467 million. • Stock- , ploys about 200 people and ` ; ° • ', has been awaiting regulatory " holder and director Roy Huf• fington, who lujnched a serves customers in Anchor. age. Logic River and in the approval. •+ .' -" •.., A 160 million Enstar ptpe- proxy bid for control of the Kenai•Soldotna area. .,, 12 ,� rw N,1.1. I11B1r•r fill NV%L Nrdnr.Jiv. %fifth 1". 1004 Enstar Fails to End , Battle With Ilulder, ` Is Seeking a Suitor " Hy [funwr. lid n• uuly AI.11/ 11, Ix.11.•I,.l i111 W.11 hill. / 1A.1.11081 _ (1111'eTIIXwBablif l'nlp.. rl'p1111141111 illl effort 111 t/•iUe :I prordw,II linitr light %fill Its largrbl MlarrhPddrr Oit 14 tu'r1I119In tell the ranq,,ulY, 161111 it %mangy In he dr" - quirril I'll ifs a%n. • lit fin r11u11 10 hWa11 fill the proxy (,rill Ihrpnletud by 111111 Al. ibdhnslnA, If nnllnnr nirr Housltn fill Invebta, Y,netdr wiul it agrrwl In nnnt/dialvly replace the thrift, III, reflors up for rerferhim fit flu- rompanif's Ally if anhual n%rhnp %dh Mr. 11u111ua ••• .•,r-'•.. �...•,........�.�,..., .......•.,....«.... �,,+,•Aw,y.rq,�. �,.,.,.•• Inanhnod•pirliNmempl'IA.thendimdu'1% pruthcipnl, pipeline imd engineering ron• ' tan a.nd 11 also offered Air. Hvlpniilon the Iq'pIr1111111Y In ^pamtrg1at ui IN prae►li" at belling the- enlnpan . lift. - - Bid Mmilar sand HufloWlen, who awns 11.11. /f Bnitir a cmunun find call- vrnihle preferred thous mdufaedins, to. rect d Ihr pmploal and'•mmstodihal fie by .. 1 ; given imnkVliafe rmaroi of the rompany," Bnffii► cod its Ward bl'IIPYI's iihll , fr. HIIllingtolf shouldo't 1 girrn control of the . tonipiny fill. iM salr pf1we" 1s going on" DetilAN al Wbnl 11 Rl trot an •'apvmus ' conlUctod mtetesf." Bpstaramil II Me, Hul• , I Imglitin ganinl control he watild Mgt gain control of W; Id the amil4loy's Infhlnnldn Jolla Venture, Its most Imlxflalut Asset. That would ,giro hum Veto power over any ptir plal by other venturers and fork In his po, / { Hhnn as operator:' Bnflar 6'11d, A spikesman for Mr. Iilffingpm said he would be making filings Imlay wall flip men• • cities and Kschange Commission that would • " nulhr Air. 111111111 a's Imemions "tons- plelely afoot" nu woald explain Millar's 'ha tilY called Wild merllun" yedlrrday. B,irlifr tills month, Mr. Hullinglnn on• ,1 nathrrd Ihal fir would solicit miles In do m1 a11pt 10 mot Btglsra 6aord and %'pact "committed r, •� . a r.�ww+w ••,-. ..,/rr...r..l�vr... ,.... 11 wilt a board Ia b"affin8 abmll t sale or merger ill Bllslar an letllls whivh will maslmltt 6lackbalder Values of I promptly m passible:' : Air. Huffmolan, an Y,nstar director and a ! 3 i pDafinor in the company's IndmirNnn "-,Jr. lied Natural-gas project. Item his plish;Nr 3 I the idle of Molar, llisl August, he ai{rred his ' to sell 13Million 11ILIretoTeuroPrim Ifum carp., Tian Antmow, Texas. for 0.9 malun. Trxono lafrr pulled out of the Iran$- seimb. But yesterday, A Trtatn sp okesnun, asked wbelb" Ihr ramµmy was still inter• riled to purchasing PlIst'u, said. '•wo art - - _ ro lunims to evaluate out pnstuum" to the company. — A source Owto Baiuir sold other tom - panu-s iftal havvrlip rossrd an intrrrbt Mac, , qutmng Bbsbur include loIWI Corp. of ' Hanfon slid AIRkon Corp.14 Chleago. Mel, toll officials co uhln t be, macho) for rom- mans. sautsl officials drlfund to top nwub M,aila► has reldlnrd Morgan Stanley 6 Ca. rs its financial adviser and life invest• . I . meet firm already lids DI'sun Ile starch Or •♦] a buyer. of, Boslar spoke/mtan said. He do. tiol d to welaily pdratial sultm7. • • lea mi a letter In Air. flulfloston. WaA'rt Bid.nA,CMlrnwoM Bnslnrsadrtanycmn• — Miller, predirlyd UPI Y,irtuir "will IN, ifdd lung tolopp" the rnmpaAYa anmlal merging. • VirsirMay, Y,nstar said it Was offending Mlle date of its nnnual Mmeting to June it from May it to allow mom lion• to find a IAlyrr for Ile company. IrsUfutnlail bidden, who mid teA'i M Basfar, ptr4felr4 Ihdt Ile ci fopanY wmdd be Adif quickly, "f think Ihr rompany will 1- r If E I� i CITY OF KENAI „opt eapd4d 4 414"" I, 310 PIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 09611 TELEPHONE Zs3.7s3s March 29, 1984 TO$ Kenai City Council iROMs Planning & Zoning Commission SUBJECTS Leese Applications Tract B. CIIAP S/D for Retail Mall/ Condominium Office Space - Howard, Gernert Smith, Inc. At the regular meeting of the Commission, March 28th, the referenced lease application was discussed and reviewed. The Commission unanimously approved the application with the under- standing that the site plan remain flexible but basically the �J same depending upon the installation of utilities which will be worked out between public works and'the developer. Janet Loper Secretary w J Date Rocs vad CITY OF IC ENA I Tea P.O. BOX 580 • KENAI, ALASKA • PHONE 288.7535 TSi749sr"Ifttit LEASE APPLICATION Name of A p p l i c a n t 11011ARD, (.'NNUIR & SMI111, INCORPORATM Addreats 2207 North Jordan Avonuo Junoau, Alaska 99801 S u o i n e o n Name and A dd r o u s 1101VAM, GAMM & SMITH, INCOWRAT10 2207 North Jordan Avonuo Juncau, Alaska 99801 Kenai Poninnula Borough Saluo Tax No. None (if applicable) State Socineoa License No. B1,079184 SIC6SS2 (if applicable) Telephone 907-789-2080 C'� G Approximate 13.88 Aeros portion of Tract B, Coo Inlet Industrial Lot Doacript ion Air_Pm+ 104thdivicin" 92 Desired Length of Lea9o55 wars Property to be used for SHOPPING MALL AND MFESSIONAI, OFFICE SPACE Dencription of Developments (type, eoneatruetiosl, size, etc.) Approximately 72,000 squaro foot Shopping Mali and approximately 30,000 squaro —foot Professional Offico Spaco in indopondont buildings of approximatoly 1200 squaro foot in a landscapod parkl ko sattin�. Attach development plat) to sca1Q 1" - 0 , showing all buildinflo planned. Time Schedule for Prepeoad Developnlunt s Reg Inning Date May 1, 1984 Prupncsed Complut inn Date April, 1, 1986 Estimated Value of Conutruntinn 10,000,000 + fiats s March 221984 Date s S i -.1n e d s IKWARD, GARNER &ASM1111 i igne�d t 1 W i ,- M, I/ CITY OF KENAI CHECK LIST FOR 51TE PLANS ALL ITE'.45 MUST BE COMPLETED BEI'O":E APPLICATION CAN BE ACCEPTED Drawinga shauld be drawn to nrale 111a 50 rt.+, and muet show layout or the lot applied for anti the location or all imprfivn- mento proponod. Drawings muot ahuws 1. Eitiat ing buildingo Nono 2. Proposed bulldingo 1/ 3. Parking racilittou (how many apacen and where located) 4. Site improvement•o n. Arena to be cleared and method or diopnenl b. Propoued gravel or paved arena c. I.nnduraping plan (retention or natural vegetation and/or prop000d planting am©a) 5. Building ael• beckngp G, Drainage plan and method or unow removal haul snow surSftCtt drainago 7. Circulation plan (all ontrancou, exitn and on -site necenn) �V40 0, Lacat ion or nirjn(e) - sing permit rfisiuirod porn ncos 9. rellcinrJ None 10. Curb cuts; (where eppliefible) 11, Buildin') height 34' 01' 12. 131ii ldinfao fill or guar Use airport ufi airpart Iafsol!; mu•st cnmplotfi FAA Form 74611- i WA 0111iss doo.) not have, to bo drawn by an architnet or enilinu!esr. 2 , J T- t OIJILDING INFORMATION I On thus sihrsat tsubmit a drrswinsl of builrlinrl plannosd, drtlwn to ficale. ; Sea lns 1" a AO Pt. Conrstrur.Llnn Matorlalis (wood Frsssn©, atrsrsl hssildinrl, ote.) 11001) MMM CONS'TRUCHON ! THIS ORAWINC SHOULD BE AS COMPLETE AS POSSIBLE t i ! to { �r r 1 ! r� i. i h i it a pr,ujar,s,1 rlrowinrl i.f -srsfrr►itttsd, attach to thins iI trio as1.1 it ss'rsrlarif tIsiss pagfs, fi 1 t irsrl 1n conesrssr.P. ion snatr±riI111 3 'r x . Deacript ion of Proptirty CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE (To be comPlatod by the City) Annual rant rate or coat Zoned for Pormits requirod I Aaaowimanto a Inrsurunce roquirad Construction moat begin by Completion data for major conutruction T1115 APPLICATIQN WILL UE MADE A PARR OF THE LEASE. 1 4 Planninq Cup mi+snion 1pprovals 0ly _ Unto of A{)tjrav:jl l:ha>- rm:m - City Coolneil Approvals %3 Y%---r---T-- , O si t o of Approval "!. q F f M i i i F I E E t I I� \J} rr I I :� :`t� . � .. _ 1��1� tf ,. ' 'd ;� _' _J ► � :► - -�� _ _ � 1 - - - - - -- -- - - - -- --- -- �- / ,�'Vr�tJ •�/yC •, a r l 1 cb TRACT A �✓ 1.-�%a.-.,/✓'��; ��.�, ,? fPrevlausfy deeded F a9 o twD sen DI 5.347Ac TRACT B 23,793 AC \ y �r- -"- --- - - ♦♦ L I •' ♦ •,� 7� '� /•Ili'•./ (M �,.1 S.I,V IN/ 1, v.• a,� g flat, 4' 1 -x,co s� bd _._ . ... ..._ ._ . pa_ ..-gq'edd� - -'b; ... .,'_' f[erlprr - ,e�•eul.v: "� � � 9 b 7i •, a {� I ^PVR /IRPORT CASE 'PROF! CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DC•CICAt10N We ho/eby eo/fily that we ate the owners of sold p/operly and request ` ♦♦ Ih^. approval of All plot sho.lnq such vs eafs for publie ufillfic+, /t.. d.(lys, and/o/ ffrects dedkoled by us for pcbtic use. ►.� J � - 11 , -- L :v oward, arner G ,+ 1 *J 111it 1, inC. TACTICIANS IN 0EVELOPMENT PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION, FINANCE AND MARKETING i CONCEPT Duplication of Jordan Creek Mall, now under construction in Juneau, in the City of Kenai. SALIENT FACTS REGARDING ME JORDAN CREEK MALL PROJECT LAND AREA: Approximately 3.18 Acres BUILDING AREA: Two story wood frame mall building containing a gross area of 72,072 square feet and a not rentable area of 52,128 square feet. SHOP SPACE: 32 PARKING: 269 TENANT CROSS SECTION: Bank, Restaurant, Clothing Stores, Sporting Goods Store, Real Estate, Bakery, Travel Agency, Jewelery Store and other retail and related shops. CO3N8'LETED APPRAISED VALUE: Approximately $6,500,000.00 34ioW. Suite 132 Juneau, AK 9()801 0071784.7408 P.O. Box 334 Brownsville, OR 97327 1303108;-3363 1 Z�l IT I;P 1,46 t4 A 'j :1. }J � - �' .1 _ ,'f�l)!? �, ,fir '••l ��'-1� . 14 / �. _ 1 all `,. ... ...,•'' " (._ _"� _—.•:••�' ,): f"�pi E3 t t.i,,J-;�.:,�f:�,v_ •fir.. �. ;rjk 6=r_1 . - I - 1 f�SSTA;it1Si7T OF LEASE. $ ruR VALVE RECEIVED, BELUGA DEVALOPMENT CORPORATION, an ►. Alaskan Corporation, by and through its Vice President, Robert 3 T, Prude, ahiclt has an address of P, 0, Box 17-105, Big La1:e. Alaska 99687, and Lessee under that certain Lease dated tl:e 4 31st day of August, 1966 by and between the City of Kenai, Alaska, as Lessor, and Associated Divers and Contractors, Inc., a its Lessee, recorded June 20, 1969 and recorded in Voluno 35 at Page 1:31, the interest of Associated a)ivers and Contractors, 8 Inc. under said lease lowing been assigned to Geluga Develop- ment Corporation by assignment recorded in Book 45 at Page 312 7 of !Mortgage records and an amendment thereto recorded June _. 15. 1931 in Book 171 at Pago 2?_, all in the Kenai Pecording g District, Tl:ird Judicial ..1.strict, State of Alaska, covering the following described real property: -- 9 LOT FIVE (5). BLOCK TWO (2). COOK INLET INDUSTRIAL 10 AIR PARK SUBDIVISION, according to Plat No. K-1447, in the Kenai Recording District, Third Judicial 11 District, State of Alaska, 32 does hereby convey, set over and assign to E.N.C. CORPORATION, a Nashington Corporation, whose address is 1200 Nest Dowling 13 Road, Anchorage, Alaska, 99502, all of its right, title and interest in, to. and under the above described lease, assign- 14 ments and amendments thereto, together with all rights of action accrued to it thereunder or hereafter to accrue and all other 16 rights thereunder of whatever nature or kind. 16 DATED this :Wl day of �pk ,� -� 1984. 17 BELUGA DEYELOP4IENT CORP RATION. an A ask Corpora.Gi • 18 � By 18 •� ' L', ce res rant 20 ACCEPTXICE OF ASSIGNMENT: 21 Tito above Assignment of L 9 is hereby accepted this f,)U day of 22 1984. 23 E.N.C. CORPORATION.,R Washington Corporation / `. 26 D37;5EJW President i 28 27 CONSENT AND APPROVAL OF LESSOR _ 28 Tito CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, Lessor under the above described 89 lease and assignment thereof, does hereby consent and approve of � r1. 30 31 ._ 32 --- - ---- t/M ormea .� . r8N/110 L. OIMNiTi .. 1. • MO.f//i0r/► ce■n/�.wr • .� -t�1t. /L//M ///.1 f /Of f11.f1// iF • - 1 t f, . u r I r' 1 the assignment of said leas{e to E.N.C. CORPORATION, a tlashington Corporation. 2 DATED Chia day of 1984. 4 CITY OF KENAI. ALASKA 0 By i 0 Title 7 STATE OF ALASKA - 8 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT I g THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this1'— day of�� +�_��__ J + 1984, before me the undersigned dotary Public an or t tTe'" 30 State of Alaska, personally appeared itOBERT T. RUDE, to me known to be the Vice President of BELUGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,`- 11 a corporation, and known to me to be the person who executed the within inatrument on behalf of the corporation herein 12 naned, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the sarae pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its 13 Board of Directors. 14 IW WITNESS UERCOF, I have hereunto fixed my hand and coal the day and year last above written. 16 Notary u c, tate-e of Alaska J, by comission expires :6.Z_X , r STATE OF ALASKA 20 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT �• t , 21 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on thin day day of 1984. before on the undersigned Potary Public in anti for t e •.,,,K..:.. ,, ... •- 23 State of Alaska, personally appeared DENNIS R. PFCIFFER, to no known to be the President WPM. CORPORATION, a ilashington 23 Corporation. and known to ne to be the parson who executoa +. the within instrument on behalf of the corporation herein { 24 named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the 1sarae pursuant to i.ta by-laws or a resolution of its ' + 20 Board of Directors. + 28 IN WITNESS 11FREOF, I have hereunto fixed ray hand and seal the day and year last above written ! 27 28 otary Irab -c; nt@-�a Ot Alaska fly commission expiros:6.2 k9,Y 29 30 31 ' 32 ' j •$W COMM -- awANo C 6AN4[n Page Two % •"""°0'•= Assignment of Lease V. o .°. Mo •[.... •lN•• 0M0I • .» [IA.stl2 i id 1 the assignment of said leas{e to E.N.C. CORPORATION, a tlashington Corporation. 2 DATED Chia day of 1984. 4 CITY OF KENAI. ALASKA 0 By i 0 Title 7 STATE OF ALASKA - 8 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT I g THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this1'— day of�� +�_��__ J + 1984, before me the undersigned dotary Public an or t tTe'" 30 State of Alaska, personally appeared itOBERT T. RUDE, to me known to be the Vice President of BELUGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,`- 11 a corporation, and known to me to be the person who executed the within inatrument on behalf of the corporation herein 12 naned, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the sarae pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its 13 Board of Directors. 14 IW WITNESS UERCOF, I have hereunto fixed my hand and coal the day and year last above written. 16 Notary u c, tate-e of Alaska J, by comission expires :6.Z_X , r STATE OF ALASKA 20 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT �• t , 21 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on thin day day of 1984. before on the undersigned Potary Public in anti for t e •.,,,K..:.. ,, ... •- 23 State of Alaska, personally appeared DENNIS R. PFCIFFER, to no known to be the President WPM. CORPORATION, a ilashington 23 Corporation. and known to ne to be the parson who executoa +. the within instrument on behalf of the corporation herein { 24 named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the 1sarae pursuant to i.ta by-laws or a resolution of its ' + 20 Board of Directors. + 28 IN WITNESS 11FREOF, I have hereunto fixed ray hand and seal the day and year last above written ! 27 28 otary Irab -c; nt@-�a Ot Alaska fly commission expiros:6.2 k9,Y 29 30 31 ' 32 ' j •$W COMM -- awANo C 6AN4[n Page Two % •"""°0'•= Assignment of Lease V. o .°. Mo •[.... •lN•• 0M0I • .» [IA.stl2 i id 1"t-. .Py . . _�.. Gr� CITY OF KENAI "Od &jOid414 41, a-.44411 210 FIDAL010 KENAI, ALAOKA 00611 T13LIPHOME 263.7535 March 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO$ Kenai City Council FROt4s Jeff Labahn, Land Manager P911 SUBJECTS Rocky Point Acres • Draft Sale Procedure A revised draft copy of the Rocky Point Acres (Section 36) Sealed Bid Land Sale is attached for your review and comment. For the purposes of this draft brochure, 1 have made several broad assumptions. Th000 includes 1. Disposal of all properties at fair market value 2. Authorization of all tracts so available for sale at the disposal date 3. Sealed bid sale as the method of disposal 4. No development time schedule requirements 5. No main line utility extension by the City of Kenai. 1 don't know if this reflects the intent of the Council, but it is drafted to initiate discussion on theoe matters. This is a rough draft in a format that is suitable for review. My recommendation is to prepare the final sale brochure in a tabloid formal for easy distribution with the Clarion. JL/kh .r r f REV ISE1) 1)ItAF T TAOI-F: OF CONTFNT9 SUMMARY OF I. ANT) 1)1 q. POI;AL Authority to Sell Lando K©nai fatty Comiell GUIDELINES FOR SALE Eligibility Minimum Old Numbov of fildo Filing Location Application Filin Foo (l. Socurhy Dupoalt —� Dondlino for Ridding SCALED BID SALE PURCHASE REQUIREMENTO Payment Opti.ano Dopoolt Bolanco A Intarout Inotallmonto Will Convoyanco Dood CONDITIONS OF SALE ! RESTRICTIONS/COVENANTU FOR SALE PROPERTIES GENERAL INFORMATION FOR HIDDER9 LAND TRACTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE Llot of Proporttoo Availablo for "al« Vicinity Map Map of Truato A - E LAND SALE 010 APPLICATION I .. I, I I I , 91IMMARY OF AND nt SP(MAL Tho Kenai City Council hoo authorized the linpoanl of certain City owned lando In accordance with 1lydinanco •Rk. Theno londo nhall be oold by the oampotitive eoolod bid method to tho olltliblo applicant submitting the highoot bid for onch dooignetad property. Tho opunifle guidelinoo for onlo are outlined in the following ooction. Twenty-throo (23) land traeto, ranging in aixe from approximately 1.9 ncroo to 9.3 nevos, will bo offorad in thin competitive bid solo. All land tracts aro loentnd within the City of Kenai no dopiotod on maps included in thio brochure. 11. GUIDELINES FOR SALE Elini;b_, litys An applicant must be at l000t 19 yooro of age at the date of aalo, and may be any one of the followings 1. An individual 2. A group, aaeoniation Or corporation authorised to conduct buoineoo under the lawn of Atooka 3. An agent for another under a Power of Attorney 1 I Minimum Bids The minimum acceptable bid for any onto tract ahall Z, be the fair market: value as tinted in the publication tabloid "Rocky Point Acroo Rool/Proportion Avattab.l.o for Sale". Number of Bidet An applicant may file a maximum of one bid par sale tract. There is no limitation on the number of tracts for which an applicant can submit a bid. An application must be filed for each individual tract on which the applicant wishes to submit a hid. Filing Locations Bid applications will he available at the Kenai City Hall, 210 Fidalgo Street, Kenai., Aleaka, thirty (30) days r prior to the date of sale. All bids must he received and in p000000lon of the Finance Director or h1a designee prior to 10100 a.m., July 3, 1984. Aide may be hand delivered or mailed to the City of Kenai, Appllent ton t The authorized application form muot be completed in full to be eligible. A eoparate application must be filed for each onto tract on which an applicant is submitting a bid. Each bid shall be enclosed in a separate aeolod envelope and marked with the land tract for which the bid is being submitted. No applications will be mailed out by the City of Kenai. The bid ohali conotitute a tonally bindinn contract to purchase the deocribed real proper EA 4 ,. Filing Fees A twenty-five dollar ($25.00) non-refundable filinq i fee shall accompany each submitted bid. Security Deposits A one-thoueend dollar ($1,000.00) security deposit shell accompany each submitted bid. This deposit shall be returned to all unsuccessful bidders. The deposit submitted i " by the high bidder shall be applied to the total g pp purchase price or the required down payment, st the option of the bidder. Deadline for Biddings No bids submitted after 10s00 a.m. on July 3, 1984 shall be accepted. ' 111. Sealed Bid Sale All land tracte shall be sold by competitive sealed bid. Said bids shall be opened and read aloud publicly by the Finance Director or his designee immediately following the close of the bid application deadline. The bid opening shall be conducted in i the Kenai City Council Chambers, City Hall, 210 Fidelgo Street, Kenai, Alaska. The Finance Director shall record the bid amount for each land tract and provide a listing of this information. J 3 The first option to purchase a designated land tract shall he given to the eligible applicant submitting the highest valid bid �1 for said parcel* in case of a tie bid, the tie will be broken by drawing the name of one of the tie bidders from a hot. The _.._ bidder whose name is drawn shall be deemed to have bid an j additional $1.00 in breaking the tie. The person submitting the highest bid for a sale tract shall have not more than thirty (30) business days from the date of bid opening by the Finance Director or his designee to submit the following to the Finance Directors 1. A cash payment (cash, cashier's check or money order) in the amount of the total purchase price, or 2. A down payment of not lose then 15% of the total purchase price of the parcel and sign the appropriate real estate documents which shall consist of a 10% note for 20 years and a first Deed of Trust on the subject property. The purchaser's right as well as any filing fee or good faith deposit, shall be forfeited if the preceding requirements are not satisfied. The next highest bidder shall be afforded the opportunity to purchase the property under said conditions if the high bidder does not exercise his right to the sale tract. m i J td; The City of Kenai shall prepare the necessary legal documents which shall be executed within thirty (30) business days of ' notification as the successful bidder. The City shall record all appropriate documents in the Kenai Recording District Office and said recording costs shall be borne by the purchaser. The real estate contract shall bear the name of the bidder as filed j without exception. IV. PURCHASE REQUIREMENTS Payment Options The sale of any tract shall be accomplished by full cash payment or by real estate contract with the appropriate bidder. i Deposit The eligible bidder submitting the highest bid for a defined tract shall deposit, with the finance Director, a coati down payment (cosh, certified check, cashier's check) of not less, than fifteen percent (150) of the total purchase price of the tract. Balance h Interests The principal balance shall be paid in twenty (20) equal annual Installments. Interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%) shall accrue on the unpaid balance and shall be paid annually with the principal payment. e , Installments Dues Principal and interest payments shall become due and payable on September 1 of each your and shall become delinquent after October 1 of each year. Accelerated payment of unpaid halnncea may be made by the purchaser and not, subject to penalty. Conveyance Deeds A quitclaim dead shall he conveyed to the purchaser within thirty (30) business days of receipt of final payment and all sums due by the City of Kenai. V. CONDITIONS OF SALE d The City of Kenai offers the described real properties for eale, subject to any or all of the following conditionss 1, Existing rights and easements of record, including Dist not limited to, righto-of-way, utility easements, public easements along navigable water bodies, etc. 2. Taxes and assessments to be paid by the land purchaser. 3. Development restrictions regarding planning, platting and/or zoning in accordance with the City of Kensi, Kenai Peninsula Borough and State of Alaska, 4. Any conditions apparent upon inspection of the premises. C Y ' c � It is the responsibility of the purchaser to Ascertain any and i - A ' 1 all information pertaining to this real property. An on•sito inspection of the sale lands by any interested party is encouraged. VI. RESTRICTIONS/COVENANTS OF SALE PROPERTIES The water system, sewer system, road construction and other improvements shell be accomplished only in accordance with the plane and specifications approved by the City of Kenai. Said plans will be available for inspection or purchase from the City of Karel. Any alteration to said plane and specifications shall be specifically approved by the City of Kenai as well as affected State and/or Federal agencies prior to construction. The City of Kenai Public Works Department shall govern all construction, installation and maintenance of all improvements. No subsurface interest ohall be convoyed to the purchaser of any land tract. In addition, the harvesting of timber or extraction of minerals or materials for commercial purposes shall not be allowed. A one -hundred (100) foot buildinq zvtbactc shall be imposed along the existing bluff line within Tracts A-49 B-49 C-4, 0-3 and E-3. 7 VII. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS Rocky Point Acres Subdivision is located within Section 369 T6N, R12W, S.M. in the City of Kenai. The sale property is located adjacent to the Kenai Spur Highway approximately one mile from the central business district. This property was conveyed to the City of Kenai from the State of Alaska in 1980 in partial fulfillment of the City's municipal land entitlement grant. All tracts being offered for sale are surveyed and staked. Further subdivision of sale tracts shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Sewer and water mains are located adjacent to Tracts A-11 8-1, B-7, C-1 and C-6. It is the responsibility of the purchaser to extend the necessary utility and streets to any specific land tract if contemplated for development. For Inquiries concerning electrical, telephone and gas service, it is advised that the authorized utility be contacted directly. All construction shall be governed by the authorized specifications. All land sale tracts are zoned Suburban Residential (RS). This zoning district allows residential uses - (not greater than a six-plax) and churches as outright principally -permitted uses. Other specified uses may be allowed by conditional use permit only. The City of Kenai Zoning Ordinance should be consulted for any information concerning the zoning and development guidelines applicable to the sale property. N 4 Thi© brochuro to provided for information purp0000 only. It Im the reoponoibility of the bidder to be awar© of any additional l information not included in thin brochure which may affect the sale tracts. The right is reaerved to waive technical defects in this brochure and to reject any or all bide for any reason whatsoever. i _ Further informetion may be obtained by contacting the Land Manager, City of Kenai, 210 Fidslgo Stroet, Kenai, Alnaks 99611 or by telephone at 203-7933. , r� r l _ ....y_ I .tea, - _..�k" .�}i,e3't a'viww•NiI- ..»-,.. - - I '/A1 F ROCKY POINT ACRES 5111101VI_SION I 1 1 1 4 REAL PROPERTY AVAILABLE FOR SALE .w.wawrro APPRAISAL. VALUES AND MINIMIIM BIDS " ZONING APPRAISAL/ r TRACT DE5It,NA110N ACREAGE MINI14UM BID A-1 RS 3.0 A-2 Its 5.1 A-3 RS 4.4 A-4 RS 6.2 9-1 RS 4.2 _ 9-2 RS 4.7 " 8-3 RS 3.© 8-4 RS 8.6 9-5 RS 5.5 9-6 RS 3.9 9.7 RS 1.9 C-1 RS 2.4 3 C-2 RS 4.7 C-3 RS 3-.4_' C-4 RS 9.5 C-5 RS 5.3 C-6 RS 4.0 r 0-1 RS 4.6 0-2 RS 5.6 I 0-3 RS 5.5 ; E-1 RS 5.9 , E-2 R5 4. E -3 ITS 5.3 RCAI• PROPERTY RESERVED FROM SALE A RS F RS —_ G RS-- o. f k. k 1 i e 1 [L Ai i_ - - -- - Roam F I I, v . i • xis �� � ! ' 24 19 j ;1 tb �30ITI.... _. �...,Z i M,4'P THIS PLAT KEN'Al ol I � •. 4.it, �.• •jl.' I , w I I mow✓ r ,r a - - — .._ H • 4 � ,�e� i) •7.7, Tract C3-1 Tract D - 7 'rract C.; 4.2 AC AC At 2.4 AC I °• Tract n - 6 Tract B � ''- - Tract � a.0 AC 14 11/L � 4,7 AC Tract C-3 Tract n - 3 Tract ©- 5 4 AC IA/L 0.0 AC At 6.6 AC M/L Tract B-4 8.0 AC All It. I Tract Ff INEMINNIL F fray t Il " 7 Tract C -I '_._.. Iu AC Al/L a.4 AC lot /L GO ,r 4 7 . A C If L •I lr • � .s ..• a a. .. •... ..... � -..� .. ..•ter a. ..a ..+..;; ��•••»4.,, �-4�• ,�l • so Traci 8, 3 AC ld/L .. yr � -. .. .• .v. �I ... i.� �/ 1 • . _ .._ .... .....�:__�� _ . ,�...r.assa..r� ....r ...�r ._ Tract C - �} D,9 AC M/L {,. Yor OF 13LIJF Tract f'f _. A. N I I u Vl 3 i Fr. t Tract B- I Tract B- 7 'rracf C 60 R.O.W. �, ,:,; ., � _ ' ' •o "tract B - 6 Tract Q-2 Tract � 2.9 AC NIL 11/L 4.7 AC M/L q)/ � • .., . . ..... ..� _^ra.-u rsu ...� . �r.__�,y�TI ,_4a•` ' }I',, I' • _._.' �-•y'~-��..+s_r� '� f �• 'i Tract C -3 Tract B- 3 Tract B- 5 ,. 4 A C NIL �.0 AC M/L 6.6 AC M/L ■ lm Tract Q - 4 8.0 AC NIL 1 Tract ✓7 4.1 . . . . . ............................ . . R.0,W, LINE Tract D 0 A C ' 10 1'r o r, t C - 61 4 A C c)" Go' R .0-W Troc I 4 A C 'Tract D - 2 A L 600 Tract E- 3 A C Tract D - 3 AC L u •„.. �- _. -.: :_� nth Rf. :—� f I• k OQ6 •el f P°1 �. t.INf: AQ2HO . Tract D -1 Tract E - I soplisl Church :�' AN At 6,o A At N Property �/rac0/ (r4 t E-2.rrac t D-2 6 A c Al/ta.a A C O/t �. _�. �_ '�- •- .- T r a t F so --,.- •• '�'=�__---'"" Tract E 6.0 AC AI/t Air roc t D - 3 , G AC AI / L ,o J CITY OF KENAI LAND SALE BID APPLICATION City of Kenai 210 F idalgo at. Kenai, Alaska 99611 Telephones 283-7933 or 283-7535 IMPORTANTI ALL INFORMATION MUST RE PRINTED AND THE APPLICATION COMPLETED IN FULL FOR THE BID APPLICATION TO BE VALID! General Instructions 1. Minimum bid for any land sale tract is the fair market value as listed in the brochure. 2. Bid application must include a $25.00 non-refundable filing fee. 3. Bid application must include a $1,000.00 security deposit. 4. A maximum of one lend sale tract may be bid with each submitted land sale application. 5. A bidder may file only one bid application for any land sale tract. 6. Each bid must be enclosed in a separate envelope marked with the land sale tract for which the bid is submitted. 7. Bide must be received by tha Finance Director no later than June 29, 1984 at 5sO0 p.m. NAMEs MAILING ADDRESSs TELEPHONE NO.s LAND SALE TRACT s AMOUNT OF BIDs $ I certify that 1 am at least 18 years of aqe and that I am currently a United States citizen. Date rinature t { i A 77 ..J K CITY 4F KENAI Of 210 FIOALOO KBNAI, ALASKA N011 T@LBPHONB 2l3. MI March 30, 1984 TO$ Council FROM$ Janet Whelan 0. City Clerk REs Clerk's Seminar March 12-16, 1984 MAIN TOPICS Dealing with the Public .OTHER SUBJECTS! Title 29 Dealing with the Media Federal Revenue Sharing (Access for Handicapped) Computers for Municipalities Loss Control & Safety (Insurance) Legislation Affecting Municipal Budgets Politics & Elections Personnel Practices Freedom of Information Act Tax Increment Financing Records Management Computerized Minutes Conflict of Interest & Campaign Disclosure Election Prpceduree Politics in Government (Alaska) Dealing with External Auditors Overview & Policies of Dept. Community & Regional Affairs jw ..J K CITY 4F KENAI Of 210 FIOALOO KBNAI, ALASKA N011 T@LBPHONB 2l3. MI March 30, 1984 TO$ Council FROM$ Janet Whelan 0. City Clerk REs Clerk's Seminar March 12-16, 1984 MAIN TOPICS Dealing with the Public .OTHER SUBJECTS! Title 29 Dealing with the Media Federal Revenue Sharing (Access for Handicapped) Computers for Municipalities Loss Control & Safety (Insurance) Legislation Affecting Municipal Budgets Politics & Elections Personnel Practices Freedom of Information Act Tax Increment Financing Records Management Computerized Minutes Conflict of Interest & Campaign Disclosure Election Prpceduree Politics in Government (Alaska) Dealing with External Auditors Overview & Policies of Dept. Community & Regional Affairs jw t4 — / r. CITY OF KENAI Ste FIDAM NWAI, AWIM eeett ' "" TBLBPMONQ Ze3.7616 March 30, 1984 TELEPHONE POLL KENAI CITY COUNCIL A telephone poll was taken on March 30, 1984 for approved of a purchase order to Air Tek for $1p400. This purchase order is for repair work on the automatic transfer relay to the Underground Pumphouse. Mayor Tom Wagoner - yea Councilman Ackerly - yea Councilwoman Bailie - yea Councilmen Hall - yea Councilman Measles - yea Councilwoman Monfor - yea Councilman Wise - not available 7 /1 �✓ tI% MORE a an, city er 0 Poll taken by Janice Taylor J - r I IN Fo — CITY OF KENAI 440d a 4"0-' 910 PIO iALAOPNON6 KINA1Zdal�KKA Spell -Y — March 200 1984 MEMORANDUM T01 Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager & Tim Rogere, City ttorney fROM1 .s f Labahn, Land Manager 4 SUBJECT Competitive Sealed Bid Sale - Tie Bid There to presently no provision in the Kenai Munict.pal Code for breaking a tie if identical high bids are submittet, in s competitive sealed bid sets. I suggest that the high bidders be a allowed five working days to submit a new bid application to the City. The process could be repeated until a single high bid is submitted. This format would not apply in a competitive sealed bid sale with ` an applicant who has the privilege of an off -set bid option �.. per the Code, T. y. jl/jo 4 E .4 a % L C, I. c- i t `e 1 — a I' �I r 9 I .y -- 1 TINFOTAMS TIPPETTS-ABSETT- MC CARTHY�- STRATTON APROif::19lOYAI.001(If1!(AttAY ,� `•�,�i:.,. • .; LNlJ4ww" City of Kenai Poet Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attentions Mr. William Brighton March 22, 1984 City Manager Invoico 150-6 * W%*. Engineering SerVioes - Financial Analysis and OutlLhe Design Study - Per Agreement approved an May 31, 1993. Periods January/February 1994 Task 1 - Demand Analysis a Facility inventory - 018#700.00 100% Complete 019,700.00 Lose Previous Billings 18,700.00 0 $ 0 Task 2 - Harbor Functional Requirements - 08,000.00 100% Complete $ 8,000.00', Less Previous Billings 6,000.00 0 $ 0"- Task 3 - Environmental • Rsviow - $111000 100% Comploto $11,000.00 Loss Previous Billing 10,450.00 550.00 $ 550.00 ' Task 4 - Conceptual Design Alternatives - 036,600.00 " , 10004 Complete 036,600.00 ' Loss Previous Billing 36,600.00 .• 4191 6U'SINDS PARK 9OULWARD, SUITE ONE • ANCHOM62, ALASKA 99503 • TELEPHON9 (9071 502-2622 / s, — • fjru7y Mft-m Pop- 1 City of Kenai - 2 invoice 150-6 Taok 5 - Preliminary Coat Estimate - $8,500.00 1001 Complete Loon Provioua Billing ' Taok 6 - Financial/nonofit - Analyoia - 020,100.00 100% Complete — Lose Provioua Billing Taok 7 - Analysis of Preferred Alternative - 015,400.00 , $ 80500.00 81500.00 j 0 $ 0 0 $20,100.00 18,090.00 " 2,010.00 $2,010.00 .00, ._ 100% Complete 015,400.00 r Loos Provious Billing 13,960.00 � i 1,540.00 01,540.00 Task 8 - Report Reproduction - $17,300.00 504 Complete 0 6,650.00'" ' Loss Provioua Billing 6,920.00 1,730.00 01,730.00 Total Thia invoice . . . . . . . . . $5,830.00 1� TIPM-TTS-11 HE,LT-MOCAR'fitY-ST14ATTO:1 A ProfooEsional Corporation +.w.-►wa/r/�}J, i•w.r ... .. .... •.. ., ... w � r ••w•.,.w N��� t•..MI.�.M�••MI�NI..I..I �.MI► . -....N-_'�.y�...M..l�w....rw-.. nCr, f i r i- f o � l i ti .. 0 1 I — f 1 j - IN F'0 -- b 41411 ti` rid► ,�� 484 m 'rr�C�ll��oK/ K � eL_ N^1 .4 The Honorable Sill Sheffield Governor of the State of Alaska Mr. Vernon R. Wiggins State Co-chairman Federal Co-chairman Alaska Land Use Council Alaska Land Use Council Pouch A P.O. Box 120 Juneau, Alaska 99811 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 Door Co-chairmens We appreciate the opportunity to provide the Alaska Land Una Council with the views of five federal agencies concerning the formulation of the proposed Kenai River Plan. The Kenai River, its tributaries and adjacent wetlands constitute one of the most productive fisheries in Alaska. It also receivan the most intensive human use of any system in the state which has resulted in a growing conflict among the user groups. Historic productivity is threatened by development activities designed to prevent river bank erosion, provide river access, store boats, build homes, develop a transportation network and provide a first of otbor private, eon».-nereial and recreational opportunities. We support the State's lead role in development of a comprehensive Special Area Management Plan for the Kenai River and adjacent wetlands. The recommendations of the Kenai River Task Force and the substance and intent of Legislative Resolve 26 and Senate Sill N: . 417 are constructive actions offering the promise of resolution of conflicting uses. The ultimate goal is development of a plan representative of the views and concerns of affected user groups, Effective, implementation of a comprehensive River Management Plan will requirc support of both the interested public and the local, as well os state and federal agencies, who are mandated to manage land or water resources or enforce regulations on the river. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into the Kenai River including its adjacent wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Additionally, it regulates any work or structure on the Kenai River downstream of the Headwaters of Kenai Lake including both Kenai and Skilak Lakes under Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Thu U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Forest Service also issue permits on lands which they manage within the Kenai River Corridor. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Marine Fisheries Service (101FS) and Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) all participate in environmental decisions made by the Corps of Engineers in issuance of permits. With respect to the► Corps' regulatory role, the ultimate system for predictable and'speody handling of regulated actions would be issuance of a general permit which could be managed by state or local government and would authorize specific development activities in specific areas without the need 0 J to apply for incividual permits. A wall balanced plan which -addresses private, local, state and federal interento would be a sound basis for development of a general permit. Each document in turn would land valuable support to the other. Skilak Lake in its entirety and that portion of the Kenai River within the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, including submerged lands, are Federally owned and mannged by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Use and development of these lands and waters are subject to s number of federal statutes, Including the Refuge Admimistration Act, Alaska National Interest Lands Conservati*n Act (ANILCA), the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, The National Environmental Policy Act, and others. The U.S. Forest Service is vented with the responsibility to morago Chugach National Forest land within the Kenai River Corridor in accordance with existing authorities as guided by direction developed through their land management planning process. This process includes consultation with the public and government entities. Involved Forest Service lands He adjacent to Kenai Lake and the Kenai River and its tributaries east of its confluence vitts the huFrian River. Future management of thane lands by the Chugach National Forest will continue to incorporate state, local government and public concerns, including those: represented in the proposed comprehensive Special Area Xanapecent Plan for the t:enai River. We believe it is important to recognize and integrate requirements of applicable federal law as well as state and local laws into the plan. This will assure wide spread support and significantly increase effectiveness of tho plan. The federal agencies represented below stand ready to participate in and fully support development of the State's management plan for the Kenai River that fairly represents all affected interest . Regional Director rut -if e ire! E. Saiitig Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Se ice Colonel, Corps of Engineer District Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency i 1JQ.1, t)hM IEL-0 lti©vruryorr STATl: or Ai.AmscA W PIU: tip Tole tyONFnhun J1rntlAu February 22, 1994 Ms,,Jackie Russell ERA Property World, Inc. 11127 Kenai Spur Highway Kenai, AK 99611 Doar Jackios Thanks very much for your letter which John Wise delivered to me through John Shively, my Chief of Staff. I would like to talk about a couple of points you raised in your letter. First and foremost, I think you know me well enough to recognize that I am not the kind of individual who punishes areas of the state beeauao of vote totals. I do not believe in that kind of political retribution. In addition, I might run again sometime, and I certainly wouldn't mind having a few more votes from the Kenai Ponineula, if I do. Apparently, the only part of the budget anyone pays atton- tion to anymore is the capital budget. I admit that, compared to some other parts of the estate, Kenai perhaps did not do as well as it desired. On the other hand, I have asked local communities to submit their priority projects to me and to their legislators for review during the capital budget process. This year I submitted approximately $333 million in capital projects and suggested a $700 million total capital budget. Thua, there is ample opportunity for local legislators to get projects of high priority into the capital budget. In addition, I think my Administration has made several other major commitmonto to Kenai. For instance, the operating budget contains over $2.1 million just to work on the Kenai River situation. There is no comparable effort being made on any waterway in the state. This is obviously appropriate since this Kenai River presents one of our most difficult mans emont and allocation problems both anit relates to land use and to fisheries. In addition, my Administration has made a major commitment to the royalty oil contracts which should have a positive effect on the Kenai area. Even though we have received J' M ' I f - Ms. Jackie tussah -2- February 22, 2984 serious criticisms from a number of legislators for those contracts, we have chosen to push ahead with it. It scams that a number of our logislators would like to sae us selling oil on the open market rather than encouraging local refining, t do not subscribe to that theory and will continue to support the royalty oil contracts as they hopefully make a successful way through the legislature. I do apprec:Lato your note, and thanks for the positive support regarding the mansion renovation. I look forward to seeing you the next time I am in Kenai. Sincuroly, 114v ' Sill Sheffield Governor ffa 1 . !1 1- V I 1 i 1 lry r i I , • �t -- LZI J 'f � March 309 1984 .; . :« 1 O CITY OF KENAI 210 PIDAL00 MAMMA 00611 TIELIP40NI283.7636 TOs Kenai City Council FROM: Airport Committee SUBJECT: Recommendation for Consideration - Basin Construction in Two Phases The Airport Committee met March 22, 1984 to respond to your request for consideration of the Float Plane Basin project to be done in two phases, After much discussion and review, the Committee submits the following motion for your considerations MOTION: Committee Member Odgen moved, seconded by Committee Member Jones to recommend the City Council begin surveying and soil testing at the basin to see what the City is up against. VOTES Motion passed unanimously. Details of the discussion are in the minutes in your packet an INFO 10. Janet Loper Secretary r� ''• J r R � KENAI AIRPORT COMMITTEE March 229 1964 Kenai City Hall Raymond Measles, Chairman 1, ROLL CALL Presents Heasley, Jones, Oloson, Sibley, Odgers Absents Ames, Bielefeld, Lofstedt Also Presents Mayor Wagoner, City Manager Bill Brighton, Airport Manager Swalley, Public Works Director Kornelia. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda approved with the addition of the minutes of 2/29/64. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES oft of February 23, 1984 b,. February 29, 1984 Minutes were approved as submitted. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 5, AIRPORT MANAGER'S REPORT Mr. Swelley gave Chairman Measles a copy of the resolution establishing the Committee 6, OLD BUSINESS no Request for Pr000nals - Float Plane Basin Chairman Measles reiterated the regetest from the Council that the Committers consider the prenject done in two phases. Public Works Director Kornelia asked to speak on the design -build aspect. Mr. Kornelia explained several reasons for not adopting the design -build type of bid which includes too many variables to he able to have an accurate estimate for the contractor; design -build projects are very costly; must consider that if the project goes out to bid and it is determined that it is too costly, the City may then be open to claims for the coot. The City hoe done two design -build projects and they both proved to be costly and would have . e r. _ 1�i1�u11M��lri,'�[ilr�elllM�Gt;+�mwrr..y/L►` _ „X., ...,i__,:.�.;.�,=-�=Jj�.' �- _.----^-:*��i..i �'i - - p AIRPORT COMMITTEE March 22, 1904 � Page 2 been far more difficult if it had not been for a good working relationship with the contractor. As example, the gym project had 11 change orders. The designer is going to have to take into consideration the elevation as flooding could occur. There havo been problems in the area with flooding in the past. The City will have to require the contractor to have a $1 million professional liability omiooiono and errors inaurance. The other thing that noods to be done is a aoile sampling. Don't want to begin digging and the contractor could find that the soils are saturated and pumping will be required or that the soils are clay and will cave in. In deeign-build, the contractor is bidding on unknowns. The Committee next discussed doing the ramp extension the same time as the float plane basin is done. The desir- ability of doing them together would be that, should the soils prove usable, the aoile excavated from the basin could be used in the ramp and those taken from the ramp as ` overburden could be used so fill in places needing fill at ' the basin site, saving the taxpayers a sizable sum. Again a soils sample would be important. If,the basin were surveyed+ - 000n, when the projects are ready to go, the contractor could be pointed at the flagged area for either dumping y� i overburden or excavating needed backfill. n Mr. Brighton was questioned regarding the grai$t in Juneau. Mr. Brighton explained that the money is in the Governor's budget and that the legiolature can't veto the Governor's budget so the money is secure. Mayor Wagoner pointed out that the idea was a good one. The City wants to get the best benefit for the money granted. It is better to slow down and do the ro eeto right, rather than forge ahead trying to p j g r 9 Y 9 make a time schedule and perhaps make a mistake. Chairman Measles asked Mr. Bryson whet boringo or samplings had been done in conjunction with his report, Mr. Bryson stated that the only sampling had been done on the perimeter of the basin. MOTION$ • Committee Member Ogden moved to recommend to the City Council to begin surveying and obtain soils testing at the basin to see what the City is up against, seconded by Committee Member Jones. Mayor Wagoner pointed out that if stakes were put out now they may he lost, Chairman Measles stated that there was no (� time set on when to do this. Mr. Brighton expected that a 11 • �A�a���al� l AIRPORT COMMITTEE. March 22, 1984 Pago 3 portion of the money could bo nvailable at the and of Augufst. Mr, Brighton asked Mr. Kornelia when we could be bid randy, he atntod that in else month, with advertising. VOTEs Motion pooped unanimously Chairman Monslea naked that the recommendation be passed to the Council. 7. NEW BUSINESS o, Review of Lease Applications Tract A, GAA S/D No. 2 Kenai Aviation Center - Kenai Air Alaska (Referred from P1a�no Commission) Chairman M000lso ruled that this item is not in the realm of the Committee's responsibilities and requested this be referred back to the Planning Commisaion, S. COMMITTEE QUESTIONS & COMMENTS Committee Member Sibley statod that'he wished to resign the Committee as he is looking to move to Soldotno. Chairman Measles stated that the Committee has appreciated Mr. Sibley'e efforts, recognizing that Mr. Sibley has put in more hours on the project than anyone. 9. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 10, ADJOURN14ENT Thorn being no further bunineaa, the meeting was adjourned at 8$ 0 p.m, Janet Loper Secretary t ' J I t a Y Ir{` i I ;'f v �- KENAI AIRPORT COMMITTEE Special Maoting, February 29, 1904 Kenai City Hnll Raymond Meanlea, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Prevents Menalen, Amen, Bielefeld# Jones, Sibloy, and Odgers Abeents Lofstedt and Olenon - Excused 2. There being only one item for consideration there will be no further items. After diocuooion, review, and amondments, the following motion ie offered for consideration to the Kenai City Councils MOTIONS Committee Member Jones moved, seconded by Committee Member Sibloy, that the referenced report be adopted an submitted with the recommendation that the basin construction proceed as funds are available (thin conotruction onason). VOTES Motion panned by unanimous; roll call vote. NOTES Delete the off site sewer and uoe on rite diapooal - to be done by developers. 3. AD301IRNMENT There being no further buninaua, the meeting wan adjourned at 9115 P.M. Janot Loper Secretary r ii A I.L. A ICJ O oS a KGNAI PLNIUMILA 1101111111,11 k1,GU1,AR Afit�t>MIIi,Y f-WHIMI APRIL S. 1484ii 71,111 P.M. BOROUGII ABMINIBTHATION BUILDING GOLUOM, ALASKA •ACENpA rur. �`.• , 7•i �"�, snnmbll! A. CALL TO ORDER h,'•• Booglas • . D. PLlibtlE OF ALLEGIANCE vPq GI4001r, Ick C. INVOCATION1 Rev. Bill Still, No. Star Methodist Keene IlcGahan D. ROLL CALL Nash Sowali R. VACANCY, DRSIGNMON OR MATING OF ASSEMRLYMP,MOER ► 084t,Id Gtophons F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF 1lsrch 20, 1004 Walli Arnose 6. COMMITTEE ROPORTS Carey Corr jai Finance (Crawford, Carey, Corr, Dimmiek, Glick) Crawford bPublic Affairs (Sowell, McGahon, Stephens, Palo Douglas, pail@) Dimmlck (c) education (Keene, Welli, Cich, flash) d Logislative (Dimmick, Arnoss, Jean, flash, Crawford, Sewell, Keene, Glick) 11, AGEhOA APPROVAL AND CONSENT AGENDA (a) Acknowledge Rocolpi of General Goveraront Budget for Fiscal Year 1984.86 (b) gas, 04.66 "A Resolution of Clio Kenai Peninsula orvugTi"FTxtMa Interest Rates and Other Potaile of ftb 668,030ingg Gonoral Obligation School Bends 1994 Aceoppt�ng the Offer of BeettCller 6 Company fur 9110 Purcbaeo of the sonde" (Mayor) (c) Ros 84.71 "Declaring Cho Round Portable Clsparonm ni' orling School Surplus to Cho floods of Clio School District and the Kenai Peninsula Borough" (Mayor) (d) Approval of Furniture and Equipment List for sterling, McNoil Canyon, Kajifurnsky Beach 1 and Tustumona elementary Schools and for WIS Auditorium Addition, i, ORDINANCE IWARIOUS (a) Ord 84•14 "Authorising on Exchange of Certain uruB ugi patented Land with Trudy S. NOW (of Land of Approxiastaly Equal Value" (Mayor) (b) rQ_d,_94.17 "Authorising Cho Appropriation of v, iAf"iron the Gone ral fund Into the Konal- Soldotna Landfill Ileintonanse Budget to llandle the Unanticipated Volume of Solid Waste Disposal in the control Peninsula Region of the Borough" (Mayor) (c) Ord 84.19 •'Rosono of Lots 1.20 and 24.40 Block r g nali Townsito of sowara Section i0, TIS, RiN, to Malti•Famlly Residential (4•1)" (Mayor) (d) Ord,_84.2A "Increasing Appropriations by 116,665 000 rum► on Procoods low tiro construction , Furni4h�ng, and Equipping the Public School Projects at Soldotna Junior high, Paul Banks Elementarr, English Bay, Port Graham and Iloner high school' (Mayor) �ir%fnirfmmiM�FiiiYp�ii►i�Pft INTP'P"'f;TION OP ORDINANCES (a) ...d, 84.17 "Approving the Total Amn►nit at the R000l oudget and Ali ropriating i8,6b0 463 for II. School Purposes for ;local Year (Mayor) (b) Ord 84-;g "Revising Title 4 of the KPB Codo of 01 8idlnancoe Governing Borough Dloctions" (Mayor) K. CONWORATION OF RESOLUTIONS (a) os R4- 0 "Adopting Pracoduras Governing Ansombly . rave anOther Proceaures as Contained in the Assembly Manual for 1984 as Revised on Docami/or 20, 1083" (O/mmick, Legislative Cmto.) Potpnd 2.21 j (b) s 84• "Mithorising the Iliapossl of Borough cur a rich Are Outdated and Sehodulod (nr Disposal Under the Borough's Reeor4s Management Systom" (Mayor) (e) os R •s7 "Authorizing a Contract for the Construe -a art Graham Elementary School to Colilno (:onstruction Company in the Amount a[ $1,1t7,963 Ponding the Salo and Delivery of 1OB3 School Donds" -� I (4tdyor) (d) or the lixt tinsCsecretary PositionoWithinothe an Peninsula Borouphlo Central Peninsula Emergency Medical Service' (Mayor) j(a) Roo, 04.60 "Autheriting a Contract with McLane and 1osoc&4t*t for the Design of Pool Avenue" (Mayor) if) p{ten, A4.70 "Royuestingg ChanIF In the Comprehensive {ranagomon-C Plan for the Konof Notional wildlife Refuge to Eliminate Aeyulsition of Privately Owned Lands Within the National Wildlife Refuse By Eminent Domain and to Include Provisions Within the Plan For Free Access to Privately Owned In -Holdings within the Range" (Mayor) is) not, 4.72 "in Support of, and Urging the Adoption (. omm %e Substitute for Sanote Bill 4l7 Page Out of the Senate Resources Committee" (KR Costs) f L. PENDING LEG(SLATIO11 'This item lists legislation which will be addressed at j s later time as noted; not for action this mooting) (a) Ord, 64.15 "Adopting a New Chapter 10.04 to the - ` Kenai Peninsula Borough Code to Establish a Waste �3 Dispose/ Commi6sion and Providing Standards for Operation of Borough Waste Disposal Facilities" '! (Jean, Stoplions, Carey) Postponed to 4.17 ( (b) Ord. 04.21 "Changing the Pismo of the Central Peninsula Emergency Modical Service and Ambu- lance Services Area to the Central Peninsula Emer ency Medical Service Area" (Mayor, Roll. CPE149ASA Board) floor 4.11 (c) Ord. 04.23 "Amending the Kenai Municipal District toning Code to incorporate "Planned Unit Residen- tial Development Ordinance" Within the City of Kenai" (mayor) hear 4.17 ! (d) Ord. 04.23 "Resone of Lots 1.10, Block 2, Donny- brook Subdivision from Rural Residential to Suburban Rooldontial District, City of Kenai" (Mayor) hear 4.17 Ir f t " 'r 1 n (o) Ord, 44.21 "Amundinit Kilo I.20,e2o to 16,11111 Pfocedurue for the Appr„val and i'urch,►so of lurnitoro and Cquflierinent f►.New fiehm►16 nr 1' Capital 1►.ipruvomonto" (Education Cmte.) hoar 4, (t) Ord, 84.18 "Petona of Gavorsmont Lot 136, City of Konal, from General Commorclol to llrban Rani• donti,►l District and Amending the Kenai Land llso Map" (Mayor) Halter 4.17 (g) Ord, 84.20 "Appropriating $210,000 from Clio Undosignoted fund Baldnco to 1:9tablinb is Contin• Jency for the Suutb Pen!nsula Iloopital Service Arad Capital Projects', (Moyar) Hoar 4.17 (h) Ord. 84.16 "Amending the Borough Codo of Ordlnonens Resources" a(timbeir Now /►Cmto)I Hear,4Fi�est and Timber (i) Ord, 84.19 "Amonding Chapter 17.04 of the Borough Codo to Add a Now Section Prohlbitills the Disposal of Borough Owned Lands Along Anadrdmous Vfeh Streams Unless the Disposal is in I:xchdngo for Other Proportioo Along Anadram►us Fish Streams" (Nash) Rot to P.C. 6 Kan Riv Coots; Rtn, Intro 4.17 ()) Powers and,DutiesnofrthelSouth Kenairroniniuloo flospital Service Area board" 41cCa1►+►n/Unto/Stopliens Dlmmick/Joan/Douglas/walli/a1 ck)(Rot Cmte; 1.3) (k) Ord, 83.92 "Repoolin Chapter 31.11 of the Kenai polling us Borough Codo Pertaining to Prohibitions of Noxious, In lurious or Hazardous Uses of Pro party" (Dlmmic ) (Rot Plan Cman 12.6) (1) Res, 04.7 "P.equosting a Grant from the State of Alaska for Planning, Dosign and Construction of a flow Small Boat fin or to flinilchiR, Alaska" (Dlmmick) Rot Pub Affrs Comte M. FORMAL PRESENTATIONS WITH PRIOR NOTICE (a) Ms. Vi Jorroll; So, Peninsula hospital N. MAYOR' S REPORT (a) KPBSO Minor Capital Improvement Projects Lilt 0. OTHER BUSINESS (a) Ord, A4.4 "Approving the Purchase of 1,40 Acres nr a) n77fdj+lcont to Ninilchik School and Appro- Vpriating Funds Hocossary for that Vurchaso'(Noyorl Postponed tollowing hearing (b) Ord. 84•5 "Enactingg a ;low Chapter 10.19 of Cho oroug► coda of OrJinancee Population the Sale of Fireworks in the Areas of the Borough Outside Cities" (Stephens 6 Glick) Postponed following hearing (e) Appeal Decision of the Planning Commission as$ Right of Way, Irons Subd„ t', F. Marine (d) Appointment of Sales Tax Committee REs Res 44.29 P. ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S C04D4ENTS Q. PUBLIC C0451ENTS 6 PUBLIC PRESCNTATION,4 UPON 91ATTERS NOT CONTAIf11ile IN TIIE ASSENDLY'S AGENDA R. INFORMATIONAL HATL'RIALS AND REPORTS S. NoI1CC OP NIAT tlla:Tl!sli 6 AIIJnURS;NfyT (April i, 19441 KENAI REAUTIfICAtION COMMITTEE Regular Manting, March 19, 1904 Kenai City Nall Tim Wizniowski, Chairman 1, ROLL CALL Presents Wiznicwski, Hultborg, Millor, Nolson, Sheldon Aboonts Nugent and Soling both Excused Aloo Prooents Councilwoman Sally Bailto and Parks 6 Rocroation Director, Keyo McGillivray 2. AGENDA APPROVAL Agenda wan approved an submitted 3, PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 4, APPROVAL OF MINUTES of September 19, 1984 Minutoo were approved as read - S. 01.0 BUSINESS of Roideot The Committee reviewed the budget in terms of what woe available to apond on projeeto this opring ooaoon. It was noted that the trash can lido are on their way. At the time the lids were first ordered, money was not aside for 12, however the price ties gone up and only A will be coming. 6, NEW BUSINESS of Plano for Summer and Next Year Three work ooaoions have been hold since January, 1904. As a rersult of those work sessions, it has begin decided that the Committee will focus on two mein itemas 1) planters to hold flowers 2) flowers to plant in the planters It woo the decision of the Committee to go with wooden planters after seeing how the ground level circle gardens worked over the summer and winter. The wooden planters will allow the flowers to be more vioible and to get the flowero off the ground where they qet trampled by persons: ' BLAUTtfICATION COMNIFrEE C March 19, 1984 Page 2 and by vehicles. These plantore will be constructed in a way an to allow removal during the winters to be stora the City yardo covered; and this plants And dirt removed the next growing season. It was suggested by members an Pat Porter that the planter boxes be tonguo-in-groove ca for durability an well an aesthaL•ic3. MOTION: Committee Member Nelson moved to recommend the construct of cedar tonguo-in-groovo planters, seconded by Comraitte i Nombor Hultberg. Discusninn turned to how many planters would be needed E ! the coat of the project. Pet Porter suggested using Community Service persona for the labor, and the Committ agreed on the material, City Engineer 3aek LaShot had volunteered to produce plans for the 3101 boxes. A tot of 48 planter boxes will be needed, however the Committi will aim for 12 as a goal this year. Councilwoman Salll Bailie woo asked about funds that would be available thi your before the 1905 budget is approved, Councilwoman Bi E ( explained that additional appropriations could be requer from the Council. The Committee hoe -'had a year to do at work and that work has certainly been recognized. The Committee next discussed how many flowers and possible i It wars decided to go with a figure estimate of $19000 fi flowers to be spread over the summer so planting eondit; change. MOTION WITHDRAWN MOTIONS Committee Member Nelson moved to approve the suggestion getting the matoriala for the eonutruction of the doser planter boxes, price not to exceed $1500.009 seconded b Committee Member Hultberg. VOTEs Motion passed unanimously. The Committee next discussed the nN orage and suggested the planters be made graduated sizes to allow stacking tole winter for easfior storage. The Committee next diseusrsed flowers. It was determine that the flowers, i.e,, purchase and whet type, etc,, w be under the supervision of Committee Members Sheldon a Nelson. They will be contacting local nurseries. 4 V, a.Now- F BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE I., March 19, 1904 Page 3 , MOTIONs Committee Member Nelson moved to purchase flowers for the planter boxes from the Operating Supplies Account - not to exceed $1,000.00, seconded by Committee Member Hultborg. VOTES " Motion passed unanimously. Zommittee Member Nelson coked, if the Committee is going to construct these planter boxes, will the circle planting be precluded. No, there will still be circle planting, those on the park strip will be left. Committee Member Nelson noted that it had been suggested to her that where ever there are curbs, the grass has overgrown and needs to be cut. It will be mentioned to Mr. McGillivray. The Committee next identified areas of attention for this oensons ti 1) Spur Highway - in front of Time Saver 2) Spur Highway - in front of Chamber building, Anchor ., Trailer Court. 3) Spur Highway - from Sears to Forest Drive ` 4) Willow Street ` 4) Small triangle - intersection of Willow and Airport tiny - Not all of these will receive attention this summer; perhaps the planter boxes to begin. Private businesses in all these areas will be encouraged to care for their property. The Committee discuused possible seeding in several of those � arena, Hydroueeding is recognized to be the most expensive, :_- but also the moot durable and bout looking. Councilwomen Sally Bailie informed the Committee of the '- ouggestion of the, Community Center Committee of selecting the site for the Community Center to be the area overlooking the bluff near the Senior Center. Along those lines, the Committee may want to consider the small triangle lot in front of Time Saver. This lot, becouue of various utility } - lines, cannot be built on and thin would be a good site to turn into a small park with perhaps a bench and some r flowern. The Committee noted that at tte present time, „o f s i BEAUfIFICAfION COMMITTEE ( March 19, 1904 Pago 4 vehicles use it an a short cut to Time Snver, going right over the curb ruining the grass and before anything can be done in terms of groan or flowora, the vehicles will have to be kept off, This area is added to tho lint of groan needing attention this year, NOTEt Kayo McGillivray joined the meeting at 2sOO. The Committee diocuaood co-ordinating plans for the summer with Mr, McGillivray, including the summer hires. It wan the suggestion of the Committee that perhaps a senior could be hired as a oupervioor whon it come to such things so planting and removing the plants. Councilwoman Bailie noted that the Council has boon informed of a plan using the and by-products of the sewer treatment plant for fertilizer and insomuch as the City will be using a large amounts of fertilizer and the cost is so high, it is something to take into consideration. ' The Committee prioritized their work lint for this spring as follows$ 1) Gat the plans for the planter boxes from Jack 2) Got the labor for the planter boxes lined up from Pat Porter 3) Purchase the materials for the planter boxes 4) Purchase the flowers for the planter boxes 5) Got the trash borr"la ready and out (can be done any time Kayo's help is available 6) fertilize and geed areas identified (can be done any time Kayo's help and materialo are available) Chairman hizniowoki will be anointing in drafting a job description for the supervisory -typo person who will be working during the summer. 7, PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE "CARD go COMMITTEE aucsr ONS do COMMENTS s. �- —.--#� tt .s �fiWp:�tr -Ji'— - - FI, - - _ ,t. ._•i+i • w I I f- 0EA11TUICATIDN COMMITTEE Moral) 190 1984 Page 5 9, ADJOURNMENT There being no further bus'.nenn, the meeting woo adjourned. The next meeting will be Momday, April 29 1984 at 1200 p.m, You are welcome to biring your lunch. 3enet Loper Secretary ci I 1 J sy 6 . 1 t 1 I �N rD - I CITY OF KENAI „od CapiW 4 4&&6a, , 210 PIDALGo KONAI, ALABKA 00011 TOL13PHONS 283. 7635 March 30, 1904 . F1 -- r Ntt G Mr. Robert T. Bielefeld d/b/a Kenai Aviation ,P. 0. Box 46 Konsi, Ak 99611 Rot FB0 Subdivision, North Addition Bobs While your letter to the Editor of 3/28/649 leada one to believe you are otill interontod in loaning certain airport lando, your poet conduct and atatomenta indicate otherwise, Thu chronology of evonto ae reflected by city filoa and records and recollection of numerous individualo dealing with you in thin matter are as follows: 1. By letter of January 25, 1903, you requested Kenai Airport landti for building a maintenance hangar and aircraft tiodown north of the control tower and adjacent to what the City hopon will be the extension of the eccuoa ramp north of tho tower. 2. Ate oubutanllated by a memoratielum of February 2, 1983, you ware contacted by the Airport Manager on or before February 2, 1903, for the purpotiu of nocurtaining with name apecificity exactly what it was you ware requacting. Your convortintion with tha Airport Manatier revealed that you ware raquent inh 240t000 agijaro feat and that your coticerita included accefin from the, and of Willow St rest 1 walor and unworn and aircraft taxiway occotia to the exintintl taxiway, 3. The Public 'Aorku Director antimated that $40,000- $500000 would bit required to cunslruet a gravel taxiway 25 feet wide by 19125 feet land fur aircraft aeceas to the parcel yott duaired to acquire. In addition coeto would he rettuired for the exte•nututi of the road from the end of J Willow .10 well an for water utid 13ewor, On March 20 1903, t i r . 1 March 30t 1904 Mr. Robert T. Hiolafutd Page 2 you addreuued Council and the minuton reflect your prenentntion and the dincutiaion of that ovoning. ©urinq y,,lur preountation it wan indicated that approximately 10% of the area prupotsod to be acquired would be ht,ilt upnn arod that thorn had not been n reply to the proposal, The City Manager atnted that he had roviowed the situation and did not nocesourily ogroo or dinailrao with the requeut but had ordered an appraisnl of the proporty, It woo nacertained during the dincunnion period that no concept loone application had been oubmitlod to Planning & Zoning as is normally the procedure but that the Council had directed to get an appraisal nonetholeno with coot to be borne by City, The City Manager indicated that the foonibility would depend upon the appraisal of the property. In conclusion Mr. Bielefeld was ookod if he woo satisfied and he indicated that he was. 4. By memo of March 9, 1983, from the Airport Manager to the City Mnnoger, the noed for surveying and platting as well an making sure development coincides with the January, 1979 Master Plan Study ahould proceod any leasing of this property. Alternate parcels (FRO Into 91 10 A 11) to those in the lease application were ouggeoted and various prohlemo noted includinq the extannion of the airport camp for the oola banefit of one operator, 5. On March 16, Council diseusoed the proposed concept Inane application. The matter wars referred to the Kenai Advisory Planning h Zoning Commiuoitio under the proper raviow procedures, G. On April 129 1983, you made a quad faith deposit of $19000 and a $20 filing free. The normnl proreedure required doponito and filing foots prior to proenoning or conaiduration of propenals for lease or sale of City lands. 7. On April 13, 19039 at the Younai Planning A Zoning Coa►inisnion meeting your luane application for 5 1/2 acreu ndjaceiit to the Kenai Airport control tower, Section 32-16N, RIIW# wan considered. At -that time you explained thot the project depended upon tPe upprnival anti the miotitoti outlrlent that the npplicat ioti would be reviewed in light of the Airport Master Plan to oue whether or not It in in accordance with it, B. On April 16, the Kenai Advisory Planning A Zoning Commiuoion unanimeunly riscommonded approval of the loaae application a0mitted April 12. I March 311, 1904 Mr. Robert T. Bielufteld P aqo 3 9. On April 149 19113, a communication woo wont to you by the Land Manogov regarding a certain FAA form that you should mail directly to the FAA and informing you that you would be adviond en soon tiro the appraisal woo received and that your loan►e Application wan neheduled by review by the Council on April 20, 1903. City filun reflect that nppraionl information on the oubjuct parcel was received by telephone on April 20, 1983. That information revealed 240,000 aqusre feet fi 70 rents per square foot, equal $168,000. Since City lands lease for 6% of fair market value, this computed to $10,080 per your. The low valuation war► stated so being due to lack of utilitien access and tits airport apron, 10, A memorandum dated July 6, 19039 from the City Manager to the City Council indicotoa a counterproposal to the appraisal by yourself, That proponol was for on -site septic system and well and construction of art extension of Willow Street in return for reduction from the 4,2 cents a aqunro foot to 3 cents a oquaro foot. It is also noted thnt you were domanding a 50% cap provision in your lease which would limit the amount of future reappraisals to loss than musket price and you alaci propoea to provide your own aceuas to the taxiwaya. In short, it woo your desire to pay $7,200 per year rather than the appraisal of $10,000 Per year, limit the future leene payments, and make certain improvements yourself, 11, By letter of July 25, 1903, from the Land Manager you wore informed that the City Council consented to your ruquuntod reduction in the lensu rate, to on-oito water and newer with a provioion that you hook up to City utilities when available, and to the 50% cap provision no requested bufure a limited period of time. You were also informed by that letter of the need to nuhmit information concerning your promotiod necessn route from the premises to the romp and taxiway ali.i a development time schedule for improve- ment o. 12. On July 27, we received rptiot-to-exceed price quote for nurveyinq and plattinq the properly you wished to ncqut re in the amount of $2,000. On At►gt►ut 3, 1983, the land Malinger by memorandum made a recommendation to the Kenai City Council re9ordtnq the property you wiahod to tic quire. A copy of that recnntmendation is attnehed. March 30, 1904 Mr. Robert T. Bielefeld Paste 4 13. By letter of Atulisut 5 you wore informed by the Land Mannger that the Kunni City Council on Atogust 3, 1903, had approved utillyinq fair market volcso for the property no the hang for the €sescond renegotintion period five yoara hence on wall no approving furidcs for nurvoying and platting. You were alno told that upon confirmation that you intendod to conoammate a lenno with the City, that the ourvoyoru would he inotructod to proceed. 14. On Auguut 17, the City received on your businvan letterhead an unoignod and undated communication outlining a ruviaod dovelopmerst plan for land lensed by Kenai Aviation to be reviewed by the Kenai Advinory Planning 6 Zoning Commioaion. 15. On Augcsnt 22, 1903, by letter from the Land Manager to McLane 6 Anoneintae, notice was given to proceed with ourveying and platting of the property you wished to acquire for an amount not to exceed $2,000. 16, By momorrindum from the land Manager to the City Council of 5optumbor 2, 19039 the Council wen advised of this 11111nning 6 7.on111el rodommerndat ion that your supplemental development information be incorporated into the lease application and that a date of October 31, 1905, be ostslbliohnd no a completion data. 17, On November O, 1903, the City Attorney'o office received a typewritten lint ontitlud "Go(I noted chnnges to leano between City of Kenai nrsd Nob flivlofeld" which sue)gesited five moil 11`1eat isnrs to the (file cimerit 0 By letter of November 16p 1903, to ynur attorney a proposed modified lenue was t arsdorod wit i ch oat i u f i ed all rows"ot o except a ffunvarll rev of ramp accilea to t hs a riper, i f i c lenuo property, It wnrs atated that if th(1 lonno wan unacceptable without the proviuion that 1 divappreverf, that the matter should by t aknn up with City Mnnariee r nod/or the Cnune i l , 18, Ao a reoull of a diocunss.ton between yourvelf and thv City 1•lanageer reflarding dicsseppreval of your sugguoted clsiona that wu guarafetom you leanu rightu not contained in cosy other City loasuo, a lvtlor was vent is you dated .lanuary 6, 1904, informing you that the City Mansirjer concurred with the City Altorney'a opinion. a 19, My memorandum of February 0, 1904, the Land Managetr noted the Code., olietated eixpiratiun on the preiniaes you wenherl to lesane of V'ovembitr 2. 19f0, which date was the nix month anreivoroary of the I -lay 2, 1983 appraisal, In t 1 F, t•. _ - i I - ----"-A __ .-_. _ ,..,�,�.�....,., i. r) March 30, 1904 Mr. ,Robert 1. Bielefeld Page 5 _ thin memorandum the Land Manugor suggested a November 1, 1983, loose snitintinn date as a proposed compromise which would not be violative of the Code. 20, On February 6, 1984, a memorandum from the Land Monnger noted that you brought in a lease agreement on February 3, 1984, and indicated that you ware ready to sign with an ofi'oetive data or February 1, 1984. The agreement that wan pseparod initially with an October 15, 1983 effective cote which had been received by yourself prior to October 159 1983. The Lnnd Manager noted that the City Attorney and Finance Manager felt that you had been sitting on the loovu for 3 1/2 niontha and should be responsible for the loose tent during the interim period. 21. By letter of February 13, 1984, a cipy of which is attached to thin letter, you were requested to sign and return an amended luene agreement with an initiation date of November 1, 1983, within two weeks of the date of the letter or the Administration would recommend this loose not be consummated. 22. As a result of Council action a letter woo sent to you dated March 1, 1984, by the Land Mnnagor stating that the Kenai City Council was agreeable to an effective data of February 15, 1983 (should react February 159 1984) subject to reappraisal of the property at your expense. 23, fly rnemn dated March 2, 1984, the Land Manager indicated that he apoko peri,oiinlly on March 1, 19849 with you and you were ndv i oad t h,it the Council had agreed to ini 1 1 al a the les►ne agreement as or February 15, 1984, if you would agree lri pay for current approinal. At that time you stated to the Land Manager that you did net intent to pursue the !nears agreement. That memorandum also indicateo thin the Inasse fibs an thin pruprsrl y, in the absence of othn,r directive, will be closed. 24, On March 0, 1984, it mornorondum from the Land Massailor indiratess tertnttint ion of your loose application and rotention of your deposit mace surveying and platting services subotantiol1y exceeded the deposit amount. Aa shown abovri and by our ftiou, responsibility for oubotanlial delays, are yours. It is the City Admtnistration'a position that these lands are prefsently available for inane by any insiividus,l who wishes t•o apply. i i i March 30, 1904 Mr. Robert T. Bielefeld Page 6 We are sorry that it didn't work out for you, Bob, we feel we attempted to accommodate you and that the Administration and Council spent substantially more time preparing, drafting, and redrafting a lease that was unique in many roopects for your purposes in the hopes that we would all see the benefits to the community of a substantial development north of the tower. We hope you or someone else will see the potential in developing this area and that we will be able to assist you or others in the future in acquiring City lands on the most favorable terms within the bqukds of the restrictions incident to the public trust with whiVA we are charged in the City's land disposition program, S Oce rsf City Attorney TR/md Encleuures 00 (`s 'e n " CITY or KENAI-) 61 1) it-); "Ito P.PJAI Al A .?.I sw MIFE: —J, A %\ February 13, 1904 Robert T. Bielefeld, d/h/a Kenai A+tatiori P. 0. Box 46 Ranni, Airlaka 99611 REs FOG Subdivision, North Addition Door mr. siniprolds The City of Konni proviounly cunt yots a lease agreement for execution for the above rerarenced lot which was to be effective October 1y, 1903, You recently atated that you would execute the lease agreement If tho Initi,atJon duty was modified to February 1, 1984. Howfivur,, the Konni, MunialpnI Code atates that the initiation data or ttin lf!nf;e agreeinivit, neat be no more than six fnanti,3 from the date or appraiaal. Since the appraisal data woo May 2, 1983, ilia City proposes an initiation dnt.e or November It, 1903. The encl000d tonne agroefit.,oit has been amended to reflect this clontirla. Ploono'nign noid raturn the amended Winn a(Irooment to the City. if the City hau not. entered into this leane agreement within 2 wouku or this' latter, tho City Administration will recompiand to the City COMICII that, thirs Irrine flat be unt(?red Into. Sincerely# ,,qrl 6 Win a 11r0j,11titoell City ;61 At) all / 7 C °" CITY OF KENAI %Od (%#W 4 44-1d4a," 4' (644, P. O, BOX 600 XtNAI, AA6XA 99611 1919PHO"l 961 , 1676 Auguat 3, 1903 MEMORANDUM TO$ Konni City Council iR4t4s "kJXff Lobohn, Lnnd Manntjor REs eV t3iaiafold Lonots Agreement. Thu Council hnn conoentod to loef)e 5.51 across of airport lando to Tor. Robert tliulofold under the following tormos (1) Lrenoo rate of $.03/nquare foot per onnum (2) Cap proviaian of 50% rato incroaao applicable for firot renegotiation period. (3) Roquiroment to hook up to municipal water and oewor utilitiou when available. Thu l00000 boo egreed to conatruet the needed portion of Willow Street extended in accordance with City gravel s3poeiricationa at hia own oxpenafl. Thin public, road in to be maintained by the City. The impact of a loan" agreement executed aubjilet to th000 tormo le doucribad billows , 1. Lanuo Bates The ef;tublinfied fair mnrks'at value (Ft -IV) of the praptyrty in $1011,000 or $.70 per aqursco foot. The leano rotes of 6% or f14V yiolda a $.042 per square foot ar $109080 annusst lianas) payment dssring tilt, flrnt five yeara. A nssquljilt, nsf l€ nue cuts of $.03 per ngssace foot or $7,200 per onnus€s wil i be gt),,eratoil givon thin rodssc.ed rnte. Tiles annul differesice of y2, mo (file tite firat five youra) must ba cs)nt rit,utud to thss Airpnrt Lund Fend, This; amount will inereassu during lease yeflefs 6»10 tf,FMV usenlatea in oxcas;ss O f 1 2. Cap Pcovif;inns KPtC 21.10.130 (b) provides; that aeronautical ret;itesd el:;sin on airport lsndu bu rentrictod to €1 500 1040e cute tnrreaf;u for teach re,negot iat inn period ant i t tba 30th ytsnr gilt, iv,sc(s€Iry of the lease. Therofore, tilt) cap will apply for five, not one, renegotiation pesriada. Pq a .. N In sum, thy+ City will be requirod to asnumo financial liability for tho (1) difference between fair market value sand the negotiated rate no well as (2) they ohortfaii in revenues; resulting from the 90% cnp provieiun. Administration Recommendations Propaiee a "modified" lease 5a� agreement with the intent of aliminnting thn general fund contribution resulting from (1) above. 5inco tor. Bielofold will construct a portion of Willow 5trs3et as a public roadway, this --. isnprovemant conutituton the difference between the FMV and the nogottated rate. Howover, this difference in value, if applied for the life of the leanu, would place a substantial financial burden on the general fund. Therefore, ndminisstration recommends utill ing the 1993 FMV plus 50%, (i.e., $15,120) ea the base for the sncond rO-negotiation period. A comparison of the two approachou is shown below, assuming maximum rent escalation at - each renegotiation periods ' Council Administration Lease Years Roeommundatinn Recommendation 0-5 $ 7,200/yr $ 7,200/yr 6-10 10,000/yr 100800/yr 11-15 16,200/yr 229680/yr 16-20 24,300/yr 34,020/yr 21-25 36,450/yr 51,030/yr 26-30 540675/yr 76,545/yr 30+ FHV FMV 3L/dg m -I Rd, 0,7 KSA, , �0 I 4.A.1 VWAMAI '30 fit% on rty f ro rn c lety To the editors Even that did no good. I had to reappear at "ps ;?jjCjVM.. MTRUMMIMMIM lite council to negotiate my lease Willi them, I would like to clarify a POWs Item In your 11,300m, n s done without te "LVDITOR h1lirch It edition, In there, it was reported n LETT] @RIS, TO THE ItAt I Was no longer Interested In reappearing at council. All during [big time, 11111111allil0n, Nothing could be furtispyr Iferaosmo I was assured by the administration that The truill. I am very m things were progressing normally and that I train lie, Interested (a 10116- should not be concerned. I was even told Ing PUperly the city of Kenai. that I could start clearing the land before could sign a lease dated Feb, is, ff I agreed being reasonable in not nagging and poishing h&wove;,, I will not be used, the lease was signed, I tried not to Push on to another appraisal. This was file first I all the time to see it my lease was com- Last April, I Inquired as to leasing certain getting the lease finished, because I wanted board of lite requirement of another ap. pleted. Maybe I was being a chufnie, property north of tile lower on the Kenai Air- to be a reasonable paroon. At no time did pralual, Now why shijuld I pay another If I were IISA, they womild give the proper- porl. Tile land had not been put up for lease, Anyone t011 me Illut after six months a now $1,000 to Ririe a lease daled two weeks 10 1 hall to present my idea to the c,,Ity joull. ty to build oil, U I were the federal govern - appraisal would be required. before? And rejetembet that this Was Only 3 inent, they would give the property for $1 a ell, The), approved my Idea and I made a Finally, in January. a lease arrived that I letter, There was no lease and no guarantee year and build me a st.5 joillilon bijilding formal aPPIlcullon With $I.MD "gmjd faith" could live with but (Or 1110 filet that It won that more delays tend more trips to the cause- and finance any overruns for 20 years, I am dWII. An appraisal was done in May, doled Nov, 1. Why should I pay for months ell Would not he re(pilred, neither, I am just a member of this com. n the delays began, 11tere wag a delay In that I hall no access to file property? Again, One member of [tie city isamillb; munity for tile last 25 yearg and a negotiating the lease, %#me of file leaq trillion 'a I went 10 the Council, but beforo [hit meeting told others that I was a chump for agreeing buoincisman here for tile Iwo 2j. I pay taxes term,; were! Of such concern to me ilia( I I was told flint Ihe problem Willi tile leli'm 10 lease this land, provide the cl tried talking with tile city adlefloolotriollon tY with a on all my properties on the alrisini, I am 404 never could make any propreas because COUld lie 11111"lled "allininistratively.11 mad it, my lea.go property, providu ilia city willing to pay a reasonable lewso rate atoll Therefore, I didn't stay for Ilia entire coten. Willi a laxiwsly front my lease property and [holy gold they had flu authority 19 inake ell njecling. On Alarch 1, offer Iwo pll(#n taxes on my development of Ilia prolway, I %, Finally. I had to hire son al. calls and a peratinal visit with Ill 0 develop the land for aviation use, In return, am not willing johoused, final decinlom lierney to write a letter to the city attorney, 0 city I was given a pelony a square Not deduction floberl,11.1111clefeld munioner, a letter appeared alleging flint I in thf, boalte rate for 10years. I thought I was Kenai - ^ . ' � . � ' ' � '. ) � � , �. ' . � ' � .. -- —'- - ---- - 7. ` ' s �• Cpa lotOPO s i Ai 60-000 • 'l," 1 • i, Mplf,4l.ras t 1 1• 1 � • cw.ia'ds 3+.•i�a,9F!!aelr+�.�+��iorfhii s•� ��• j c� +S •' o°Jr' •� t b •I 1 ♦ •, ti I,L •� wh •i• • .•e . ..,.r.•.vg1rN• ' •'/•'�'II yyj, �� i� �: ;1 ,.1• ,i.� � u .._ I• III/A/ .•�/„�, , ,r po s 99 Cole,t6�dA �c► cc n •„fra+ J l 1 N r-ram __.. _ � r � --. _ v � • v � . a � �r a ate.-.�.�->+ Z. u i f �V r,o CITY OF KCNAI FOR COUNCIL INFORMATION r Transfers of Funds undor $1,000 under KMC 7.25.020 (a) Data Department Amount From To Explanation 3/15/84 Parke $550.00 Misc. Machinery & To purchaso harrow - price is above 300.00 Equipment 3/23/84 Police $950.00 Operating it & M Damage to Vehicle #57 as a result of a Supplies collision. 'I .. .. ••,a.a.w-�-.., - .d�...:+�-9i�inLiaul�.(/M�9al OPlpi Pli�a - - -- f.. LM RANOAIIO IONM I rteaYAAT{eNta1110N U.S. GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION LEASE FOR REAL PRGk,PERTY AOeIN{efeATltlN ' rIA(41011) AN � e ' 0412 OF L&A$a LIAM NO THIS LEASE, made and entered into this data by and between City of Kenai whoa stldtas is Post Office Box 58110 and whoa" o orsof inihikprope9riyUstelnafter described is that of owner/leacor hsrsinsfeercalled she Lessor/Contractor and the UNITED STATLS OF AMERICA, heroinatter called the Government WITNESSETNs The parties hereto for ohs considerations horoinsftor mentioned, covenant and agree as follows: t, The Lessor hereby leases to ohs Government the following described premiss: Building contsibing 10,148 square feet located on the Northwest corner of Granite Point Street and Willow Street, more particularly described as follows$ A square lot. 352.23 feet fronting on Granite Point Street and 350.00 feet fronting on Willow Street, Kenai, Alaska s tobeusedfor Automated Flight Service Station (AFS5) 2. TO HAVE. AND TO HOLD ohs said preotist with elicit appureenantes for the term beginning on Data of beneficial occupancy through September 30, 1987 .................................... .............................. subjees to termination and tenewsl riphtt to may be hereinafter st forth. 3, The Gotornmeat shall pay the Lessor snttuai sent of 6..... 1,.00.................................................................. atthe rate of S...... L..00........................................ per year ......................................... in arrears, not for a faster period shall be prorated, Bane cheeks shalt be made payable to; City of Kenai d, The Government may terminate this lease at ant, time ItiF got in; a: Iw•s .......360 . ... days' nnsice in writing to the Lessor and no rentst shall secrose after else eftesti•e date of t:•rtdrannn. 5.►{d rnnise •lsstl Its, •,Pmpuecd •.rmn+vn.• ins with the day afoot the dais of mailing, i:/.ClILS4le1�7a1att�SLe$IaR(ad:ttlf7!(Cttplit�twlalsss�os$tttx$ettufiR Stbi'I.�OHtYW.iCRXCtIG%Jtnti'.Y.Akt►LfeASNRl4%7teiiVit': risiatt+Aid.$tJekrtat:sxisuats3s:RsiNstp:avd(r.�r.>afsrrgfisssiiiixit.:its:tsxxxs�vsrrsCt:xow.ui:xzxrgiefOssrssrr.Tca: , itD:lA4Yl�OiTA:id.t4YlK'JJId�.t4111t97i�lt%11dYs1R4KfG1G4'.14/.?1ftRY.iSD:lt6lR:tGlL/iaGL'fe%r3t9.C.7GtL`ya"J�S::ilrlslgtl!!'.L[Of9C . Ittfs>j>tatx utc�stsss.►LprraexnxaarP�r.KKK„Kseiusnrx.�otsxo:vxe: r.:.xscsse�: �.ete , G. The Lessor ihall furnish act the Government. at part nl the rental umtidetatianadte �diva•inpi a. Heating. Air Conditioning and Mochani8al Vt►ntilatlon as defined in Paragraph 101 of SFO DTFA04-83-L-83003. % % tr b. Maintonancet Provide complete maintenance for the structure, including the roof, building exterior/interior, heating/air conditioning system, electrical system and plumbing, LJpe dd 1h ••� •rI c. Parkingt Provide, maintain and repair paved parking area for �IIY approximately 86 vehicles upon the leased promises for Government employees and visitor vehicles at no cost to the Government,/Ind will be responsible for snow removal. ty , I J , 7. The following are attached and made a part hera+f: May 1970 The Geoeral Provisions and Instructions (Standard Form 2•A. .................... edition). + As Amended ATTACHMENT NO. 1, containing Article 9 through 25 ATTACH?TENT NO. 2, Solicitation for Of:ers No. DTFA04-83-L-83003 with Proposal to lease space and addendum R. The following changes were made in this lease print tJ :to execution: Articles 5 was deleted in its entirety. I� �Y'IT�f SS ��'Ilt:Rt'OF, the parties hereat ha%c hc-nan-to subscribed their names aG of the date first dhuse written. 71 EMPLOYER'S IDENTIFICATION NO, Ir .fit • Q%..........•.............. .. ..... ................. .. j.............................. ;............. ..................... t...•.... ..... ....... DEPART.''1EN7 OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION `- ............. .............. .....•........... . ... I I . :a•.�aaiF.-M::•s d• Attachment No. 1 DTFA04-83-L-83003 '.I 9. The Lessor will be responsible for the followings a. Architectural/ongineering services associated with the construction of the building shall be coordinated with the Government. The final package, including specification and drawings, shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for review and approval. b. A copy of the Request for Sid package for the construction work is to be furnished to the Contracting Officer. c. A copy of the executed construction contract with the work schedule and firm completion date shall be furnished to the Government. 10. The Government will be responsible for the followings a. Furnish standby power generator as required for backup electrical service. b. All Government furnished materials and equipment, i.e., consoles, control, communications, FSAS, ICES equipment, associated with the Automated Flight Service Station facility operation. %11. The acceptability of the space and the building equipment will be established by a joint acceptance inspection of the premises by a representative of the ,."Government and a representative .,f the Lessor prior to occupancy by the Government. The decision of the Government's representative shall govern as to compliance with the terms of this contract. Lessor will give, notice of completion, and the Government's representative will be at the premises within 10 days of said notice. 12. The premises shall be ready for occupancy on August 1, 1987 or a date mutually agreed upon between the Lessor and the Government. 13. CONSTRUCTION TIME EXTENSION This lease shall not be terminated nor the Lessor charged with resulting damage if the delav arises from unforeseeable causes beyond the control of the Lessor and/or his contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, or another Government contractor. However, the Lessor must notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of any delay within 10 days after it begins. The Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts, cetesmine the extent of the delay, and grant extensions when justified. His findings and determination shell be final and conclusive. 14. TEMINATION FOR DEFAULT If the Lessor fails to prosecute the work required to deliver the teased premises ready for occupancy by the Government with such diligence as will ensure delivery of the leased promises within the time required by this lease agreement (Article 12). or any extension of the specified tim..e, the Government may, by written notice to the Lessor, terminate said lease agreement. Regardless of whether this lease is l,ttachmant No. 1 10 OTFA04-83-L-83003 +n-< terminated, the Lessor and hie sureties shall be liable for any 'damage to they Government resulting from his failure to deliver the premises ready for occupancy + j within the specified time. 15. The Lessor shall provide to the Government upon completion of the A.F.S.S. building, a plat of survey, along with the legal description Ahereof, which will j be made part of this lease. 16. Basic annual rental wile $1.00 per -year as stated in Paragraph No. 3, however, should the cost of, aon•,otzssrst-ah--of- the facility 'exceed $1,500,000 the excess shall be pro -rated on a monthly basis (in arrears) over 20 years. Under I no circumstances will the Government be responsible for more than $100,000 over the 20 year period. i .-. ; 17. This lease may, at the option of the Government, be renewed from year to year at an annual rental of $1.00 and otherwise upon the terms and conditions herein specified. The Government's option shall be daamed exercised and the lease renewed each year for ono year unless the Government gives 360 days' notice that it will - �' not 2rercise its option, before this lease or any renewal thereof expires; PROVIDED, that no renewal thereof: shall extend the period of occupancy beyond the 30th day of September 2007, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that adequate appropriations i are available from year to year +:or the payments of rentals. . I ? .11 18. The Government reserves the option to renew this lease fo an additional 20 f year tarn at terms and conditions: agreed upon in the Addendum to Proposal to i Lease Space Form, Solicitation Na. DTFA04-83-L-83003. 19. Subject to approval by the Lessor, the Government shall have the right and ^. privilege to erect and maintain antenna wires and associated equipment on top of subject building or such other location as deemed necessary by the FAA, together with right to install necessary cables thereto. -, 20. The Government and the general public shall have the right of ingress and egress to the leased promises, and the area immediately adjacent to the leased premises, including roads, sidewalks, and parking lot, 2L hours a day, 7 days a week without exception. - 21. The Government', by separate contracts, shall pay all costs of electricity, gas, water, sewer, and janitorial services for the leased premises. 22, The Government shall have the right during the existence of this lease to make alt&rations, attach fixtures and erect additions, structures, or signs in or upon the promises hereby leoeed, which fixtures, additions, or structures shall be and remain the property of the Government and may be removed by the Government prior to the expiration or termination of :his lease, provided, however, that no permanent additions, structures. or signs shall be made or installed by the Government without the prior written, consent of the Lessor. The Lessor may, upon not less than 20 days' written notice to the Government, i before icrrsination of the lease, require restoration of the leased premises. I :his event, prior to the expira.tion or tern-ination cf this lease or prior to rcl:reuishment of possession, whichever fire: occurs, the Government shall, at t } its sole election, either, { � I Attachment No. 1 DTFA04-83-L-83003 (a) restore the premises to the same condition as that existing at the time of entering upon the same under this lease, reasonable and ordinary wear and tear and damage by the elements or by circumstances over which the Government has no control excepted, or (b) pay to the lessor a sum of money representing either the diminution in the fair market value of the property due to the failure to restore, or the actual cost of restoration, whiehaverr is the lesser amount. 23. Should an Assignment of Lease be executed, the Lessor remains liable for obligations expressly provided herein as surety in the event the asoignee fails to perform. 24. Interest on Overdue Payments (a)• The Prompt Payment Act (P.L.97-177,96 Stat.85, 31 USC 1801) is applicable to payments under this contract and requires payments to the Contractor of interest on overdue payments and improperly taken discounts. Determination of any interest due shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Prompt Payment Act and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-125. (b) The date of the check issued in payment shall be deemed to be the date payment is made to the Contractor. (c) No interest is payable under the Prompt Payment Acts . (1) On an overdue payment, or on a discount taken on a payment, if the payment was overdue or the discount was taken on a payment because of a disagreement between the Government and the Contractor about the payment amount or the Contractor's compliance with the Contract; (2), On a payment withheld in accordance with the Contract; (3) On an overdue payment, or on a discount taken on a payment, if the payment was solely for financing purpose; including but not limited to an advance payment, a progress payment under a surply or construction contract, and a payment of costs and/or fee under a cost type contract prior to the Government receipt of the complete supplies or services for which the payment was made; (4) On an improperly taken discount if the Government corrects the underpayment within fifteen (15) calerdsr days bftcr the expiration of the discount period; (5) On any payment made for utilities (e.g., gas, water, electricity) if the Contract or the applicable tariff specifies late payment charge for such payment; (6) For a period of more than, cnc ;:star on any overdue payment or improperly taken discount; and n. (7) On an overdue payment, or crfZ, c:sccunt taken on c payne^:. after -% the date the Contractor has filet t for =uch :ay-nert under tht. Contract Disputes Act of 1978. a, i T sil1� J' A'ttachmant No. 1 DTFA04-83-L-83003 i Ott 25. Payment Due Date 1{tj + (a) For purposes of determining any interest payable to the Contractor on ovordua payments and improperly taken discounts pursuant to the Prompt Payment Act, payment under this contract shall be due on the fortieth (40th) calendar day after the later of the date of receipt of a proper invoice in the office designated to receive j the invoice, or after the data of final acceptance by the Government of the supplies or services covered by the invoice. _ I I (b) An original and four (4) copies of each invoice shall be submitted to the Government office designated in the Contract to receive invoices, To be a proper invoice each invoice must include the following informations (1) Name of the Contractor and invoice date; (2) Contract number or other authorization for delivery of the supplies or performance of the.earvieos; (3) Description, price, and quantity of aupplias actually delivered or services actually performed) " (4) Shipping and payment terms; (5) Name (where practicable), title, phone number, and s,omplate mailing address of the parson to whom payment is to be sent= and (b) Other substantiating documentatiosi or information as may be opocified in this contract. (e) For purposes of paragraph (a) above, the date of final acceptance by the Covernment of supplies delivered or services performed shall be the earlier of$ ., (1) the date of the actual final acceptance by the Government of ouch supplies or services in accordance with the Contract terms; or (2) the Deemed Date for final acceptance by the Government, The Deemed Date for final acceptance by the Government shall be the thirtieth (30th) calendar day after the date required by the Contract for delivery of such supplies or completion of such services, ► (d) If the Government rejects or conditionally accepts supplies or services for failure to conform to the Contract requirements, the provisions of paragraph (c) of this Article shall not apply thereafter to ouch rcjocted or conditionally accepted supplies or services but shall instead, apply to the delivery of any replacement supplies, the correction or modification of Die aupplies so as to make them conforming, - ---� or the completion of the services in accordance with the Contract. f I i 1 - F z GENERAL PROVISIONS, CERTIFICATION AND INSTRUCTIONS U.S. Qovernmont Lease for Feat Property ' S 6 GENERAL PROVISIONS i, HCOLF,T'ruva riii: contract, or to antbenefit that may arino thorafrom; but tilis provision ishalnot to construed to exten4 to thin lease Tito Government may sublet any part of the lrretnlvea but shall not be relieved from any obligations under this lease contract it made with a corporation for its general benefit. by reason of any such subletting, 8, ARBIGN 1nxT Of CLA1S18, 2. afAixTio4ho me of Par.mio t. The Lessor shall maintain the demised premises, including Pursuant to the provisions of the Assignment of Claims Act of 10'10, as amr-rulad (31 U.S.C. 203, 41 U.S.C, I!), it tho building and any and all a juipmont, fixtures, and a • furnished by the essor under this lease in titis lease provides for payments aggregating $1,000 or mnre, claims for monies clue or to becomo'duo the Lessor purtonancos, tt�1oo4 repair and tenantable condition, except in case of +inmage arising from the act or the negligence of the Gov from the Government under this contract may be asslgned to t. Yank. trust company or other financing institution, ineh:Wing any Federal londin{f agency, and may thereafter ernntoni'e aganti or employees, For the purpose of so mair.• tanning i+aid pr�mipps and property. the Lasser may at rnusarable thren, and with the approval of the authorized he fur:i:er usparned or reaestimrrri to any Hoch institution, Any ours: assignment or reane:snment shall coverall amountspay shalt not l;ovornmont representative in char�o, sates and inspect the same and stake any necessary repairs thereto, ssbi0 under this contract Ord not a!rcady paid, and be tnado to more than one part', except that any Ruch asslgtt- men: or reasaignment stay be made to one party as APM 2. MmitagOf Flag oil OltiCaCASUALTY. or trustee for two or more partteo participatingin sue A- Dancing. Notwithstanding any provisions of ts contract, tt tits staid premises be destroyed by fire or sifter casualty this cease shall immediately terminate, in case of partial paymentss to an aen.Jgttee o! any manias due or to become due :ssttier this contract ,hall no:, to the extant provided in de.+;rsc:ins; or damafro. to as to •ronder the promises unten• antatto. as determined by the Government, the Govornrnent said Act, as amanded,,bo oubject,to reduction or set•o1. may terminate the lease by giving written notice to the Losror withiq fifteen (10) days thereafter; if so terminated de- 0. Cgt•AL OprcinTvxi;Y CLAva., (Leaiges Over $10,000) is no rent shalt accrue to the Lessor after ouch partial ssruction or damage; and if not so terminated the rent ohall iThe following clause is ap•tllcablo unioes this contract exe :;pt under the ru;en, re ..'cations, anti it -levant orders of be reduced proportionately by supplemental agreement hereto oNktive tram tlto date o! such partial destruction or damage, the Srieretnry of labor (41 FIVE, ch. 00).) During the performance of this contract, the Contractor 4. ALTenATiUM, The (;oveenmen�c snail have the ridnt during the exie:aneo agrees all follows: (a) The Contractor will not disscriminato against any am. or for ct race, color, of this tease to rnai:e alterations, attach fixtures or. erect isrlt won#., ptructuroo or ofrao in m upon :he remiss hert•1 • Pl4y� l origin. T Contra resig.oit, sex, action national origin. The Contractor will wise ox, of aflirnsusivo option th tapers that ai:pttcs:ass era employed, irared, which fixtures, additions or structures iso placed in, J/ = upon or attached to the said premises ahall be and remain ar,t i,at employees are,, troa.od during employment, without »r•g; to their race, color, religion, erne, or national origin. the propwty of the Government and may be removed or ;,d Sstci. nr:;on shall itictude, but not be limited to, the, following, oiberv'isle disposed of by the government, F,-rp:ayment, upgraciiny, der„otion, or transfer: recruitment It, P.earotsT. A point f",ys;cai sur:•oy and insDection Mon of 0-0 r;e' miscLf prOmiw:s iihal; to madit as of the effective date of :hip rcflrs:ut:r th0 bawl, l,r^rrsn, condition, and will to 04:nrd on i, ""Mf Of ism part;&# iieretri, 4. rul"t:d m47 ACM-4sT Cri: nxorwr Frro. T;.o Lepr,)r warrarti, :fiat no 1tmrson or oo,41infr rsuone is:tr ttriYi:kyl4 Or r-ainr d to "tell or F feure this lease up, n s.•r.:.trr't•rtstnt or u-•lerpmading for a commission, ri,scen- srti, s r„heravfi, or ernt.nL•br.: fee, exeeptinx bona fide .r:;, i or be-sia fins (,to ab Vir,,;d eointmreml or pallingsssrcnr;,•! mum, iined by the ;.#.parr for :tie purpose o.0 st:curifor hus;- tt�'/• i' • l rouai: •.r leis a!, r•f ., s tassns..*7 ibc last• !s• 1,;.vr the t:sl'r,: to annul ship IOLr« W;'J'out liai,,;i:y fir ! :Eon :•s rsr"fur: !rr,m -:'e ren::,i price or e; or t4iwrw;its rtcovtr, :i,t• !:::: Ln.uunt of ,,,r,' r.trven:a:e, t r,,%r°raac. or t'r•'•lt:,.'!tn: fee. (�,:• e'nn,al r,s; tt-mte ,:•spit• r•r Lrokere tL•':P.t' lrr:i!>L•L on prep• r: r :,,i' rant, in Lre, ",;S:.Cps 1•ith f;•,•t r•:'f.:: ;Grua practwe. sing v"r:o i:uvn not r,? :-An-4 rut•h :see- ,res f t::-.e vole if:irpnle f 41,ctin;.• thin lease, may by care;derrcl as born ,'se em. •,:,:Y»Jr Zr nsntsc.%'R within the exce;.:sr'r etnmfneA in th:! i•;tilt+r.j :. t.•r r VIALS N" To lZ fits tt, No YSr'tn'rar of Or "m*, xate to rantreop, cr llesiden: r w.Wrtner ►ijuli tort ivsn:stted to any stare Or part of %hits ittastr ,:r »scruitmorit ndver:iv:ra: iayo,'. cr tcrmiaailon, ratite of !•iy nr ether formr rf cr,-w-aatien: and faltz :•,n for 'rain — log. ;no' its fag s,pprcr:tcasl:i:. Tl;o C:ontrac:ct a;rcoi; ti p+at in c.,npirjtuoms ptisct•,, oval; :,:e to employees and r.pp licarts fir amJ•:oyatcnt, not!cor :o i. provided by tat• Contracting Utik,Icr tenting forth t c provii;oaf of tiliss l;qu.1 tf;sportmni:y clan,,,. (-,t The Contractor v.-Ill. :n s,;; srr,lic':::i►ns cr advcr:ile- .,i ff r r'rnivloyo— ;,,ar?b ::• Or o�••:i:Lif --f tl,e Contractor, n::: • ths.% Lii s:%A!je.,,t aTtf i..:.ntp r wil; re.tive coissidera:ton far ,•;rJ.:r•;snrr.{ w::"s"•;st res:Lrd to rswi, color, reinlon, tor., or let ,;.•• Cositractrr tt 'l s• r." tr+ each labs m:sfrr. or repro'• .!r,:.:_:• of Arorierr Ksi vhicl; he i:s.s u c t!}Ft:!ve bargain• :r„ ::••'!4r:tt •s: oi' [tl9C rOn:ries no' a fleVee. ic, b- •;tr by the• s.76n1'y t:'rtruc:ins A'llrnr. Ad"Isinr the rrI or r.•,ri••rp' re; r<,. ' "Vvsv of t:;e C,u:ra¢tertp ems or:,.... r, ,,, �'�!,e• :;Ch ''t1+9:ra/,::! 1:'.i4! :•%:sllahielto sir:• jl••'r alai sir, ;:,�i::nt� P,r Crsplo zatn%,, 1 . T:,t r :;:1:.t : r J.'..� a.!:.; ,;' tt;:C a,. ; r::'i9:•3 • f Fx- ,.r••,s., rti;..� in, tl:t�. rt';••s.,r ::, .:'rS� i.ntt 0! tht atti relr'va:.t Or.itro of m-' Se.rt'pry of f r• t i t, er•ittri,ei r tor•"!`, f ':rWth all .I:fr-Tara:.:•n and rt- t,•i», :.. «'r• M. Vmc: ,Y,• On;rr °.rt, iS.:4 r,f &-ptember S:, :.s,! •t r; r .cr, !" "MLA :rise, N.';erR of tie g, rr :•r; of 1—loot, r ••sr -ors, :: .'r.e:e:r,, al.ri ;ill perr,•,it Lt'c•r :•, 111, ten„/,I, r ca•r':!. s; , .• •a :•,rfR by %If- cG.'.tri.lLng r•..enre r,rm t-A 1 Ht.• • agency and the Secretary ,,f tabor for purponcs of invootigtl- tion to ascertain compliance with Ouch onion, re{tttiutinnr.,snd thin Aectten In any exinttn{t strreement or cone �nL£�p� ih*�niha nu•nt or one In which the cnntrr{ctin(t 1 arty r.'r ertrmd the at'nie• orders. Lcasor has the tmilaterdl riI`itt tb reriew `riaht (l)tia t� portunity clausanof thin, contract or will, any the F. )gal Opportunity r art-votnPnsrnr arrangement nid►thsxunilnteralation to rAn9w I.eesrtr auenes that It will take any an of the said rules, regulations, or orders, thin contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended, in whole or in part, he declared Ineligible for further or ••xtenrl. Ti►r• ul.+e all Iacvful actions as expadttir,asly as possible, with respect to any such unfrc•emont as the contracting tu,oncy may direct no Lut and the Contractor may Government contracts to accordance with procedures author• a ns,,nnn of enfr,rcinq the insent of thin section, ine urling. limited tc►, t•rrminutlon of the r►arrrr;meat or certeesaion and ized in Executive Order No. 11240 of Septcalber 24, 1116g, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedles In- not inatituti,n of coot•t notion. yoked as provided In Executive Order No. 112.16 of Septent• ber 24.1905, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary I1. E:xAtittxATlox r1F iiYCottns. of Lubor, or as otherwise provided by law. -..This i (g) The Contractor will Include the provlolonn of pars- fluter w►t aut a va Ali; tit;. at tho Comptroller Caner the I1 graphs (a) through (gg1 in every subcontract or purehasr order unless exempted Gy rules, regulations, or orders of the Execu• (a) The lessor agrees t United States or any of h1O duly nuthorized rap ntattves ' al paymont 6 F.,cretary of Labor Issued pursuant to section 204 of shall. untll the expiration of yeitte afto tfve Order No. 11244 of September 24,1905, so that such Pro- under this Ietrso, have access to and the to examine any records of f violons will he binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. directly p9rttnent hooks, document a ors, and Tito Contractor will take Ouch action with respect to any Oub• the Lessor involving trAnsaetio etatod to this lease. lncludo in his subcon• 3 contract or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing Ouch provisions. including (b) The Lessor further cos to all tructs hereunder a pre • on to tine effect that the subcontrac• at sanctions for noncomplinnce, i'rovided, boweerr, That in tine for ugrcr:o that the mptroller general of the United States event the Contractor bernmoo Involved in, or is or his repreant Ives shalt, until the expiration of a years ; with, titicration with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of other 6. ul •merit under this lease with the Govorntrent, ; such direction by the contracting agency, the Contractor may have ace to and the right to examine any directly pertinent ; request the United States to enter into such litigation to boo wunusnts, papers, and records of such subcontractor ; protect the interests of the United States, l wRr A -r► er•^ nub�ontract __ i 10. FactL1TIES 10xDi8CRtMtNATiON. 12. APPLtCA1tLF, CODES AND OP.tiINANCEB (a) As used in this section, the tom facility�� mear.A ta:ores, shops, restaurants, cafeterias, reptrooms, and any The Lessor, as part of the rental consideration, agrees to - i other facility of a put,lle nature In the building in whichthe (rintply v.•itis all codes and orlinances applicable to the own• crehip and operation of the bu..d£ng It. which the leased space space covered by this lease is located. (b) The Lessor arreen that he will not discriminate. by is situated and, at his own expense. to obtain ail necessary serrrestat;on or otherwiAo against an; person or persons be. In Permits and related items, : cause of race, color, religion, sex. or national origin farrtOhing, or by refuxinu to furnish, to such person or parsons the use of an), facility, including any and all services, 13. INSPECTION, At all times after receipt of Bids, prior to or after accept• {:r:vtl�g9s, aeeommo .atienA, and activities provided there, % Nc4hing hr •etn shall require the furnishing to the general furnished 1►33• tine once of any Bid or during any construction, remodeling or renovation work, the prcnsit+cp and the building or any p:.rts by public .,f too use of any facility customarily customers, patient►., floor of, upon reasonable and proper notice, shall ac:ofsi• by Contr:w::nr. Weer, e,r by ar.%Itects, Lteror solely t7 irnan:s, their employees, Invitees• blc for Inspection the him, to dater. cllertit. averts and (c) It Is agreed that the Lessor's noncompliance with the en{rincix-F. or other techniclars representing mine whether the epsential ror;uiretsnonts of the solicitation or prnc•izirnO of :his Yec:ton shall constitute a material broach the tr-a:e requirements arc met rf !i•ts lase, in the event of ouch noncompliance, the Gov- • tl:e r.• • ; riot!• action to r•rsfercc• ef-i-::ar.e , :•.:.:-,ores• a,.� Ls••:s., :Ic pur.=stess:cl.rthert.:.r as may ho provided ty luw, In the event of tcrni£natior,, thc• It ti.,• rentr,l apjocif►ed in thip lease exceeds 82,000 per the llttiration of Section ....2 of the Economy Ac: of Leteor err.11 lie liable for all excess costs of the Government it. acqu'rsn:; substrtuv space, tnchtdina but not limited to aunum, 1f� ,:. nit amender! t40 C.S.C.278at, shall apl•ty. : N ecRt of titov;na vs ruch apace, £?ubstitute Optic" shall tie ,. 1a;n••d it as corn proxirritll' to the Leasor•o buiidtng Li; !o I& nitwit: IN, Ytmi-tiu mxec, f saO:b;e r r•S mowirg eortr v: ill tie limit,•d to the actual c•x• Is, tl,r• t•:'�•rt cf f:.ftre by t're ;.error to prnc•;de any service, I•rnr••s stroof as Ineurr A. ­! 1 It IF further arrr:e•! :tout front and ufter the• cias.. utility, sir;:::, .,:.Hove er r!; :::t, r,.•c;uisnd unocr this lcate. -he Go r:::Ilt lit:te :lr.: Pis h: to Occurs gait! aesv::es, �rr� 'tie I,r•r o� wi:i. at Aurh time us any agrr•tmm�t is :', 2 at.:.sred £no or u enne,errion !s :o be permitted to operate, ,•rnsr:.n: ,..�.lss air.:ennnra cr r p«ire and to ci:3ue, the cost lher'eof from rental prrytuonts. i::d Igo or regalri, *.he inclusion of the foregoing prnviriar.r of si:ir reetion in every such agreement or concerOlon risr- te, I.er,Ooa'9 Fececsowts, r;Iant to whi•rh ar.r pi,rrrm. nth(,!- than the Lessor of oraur cr L:ts the rl:ht to ary facility, ;Cothinsr hcreir, car.• The tartr:, anal srrovisicssa of this lease and the conditi:•ns hnivrew.r, mal; I& tirr•tned to require tt.r• Lviiw r to l,r•rotn ai i?t bind the Liwoor.ard the Lessor'+heirs, executers. ••.•s,ert, r....:,,.,. or re.tRirrr tio, :t,c:urror of the frregainr prrvir!r,sr; CERTWICATION I. C)zvric.fvow riF rACILITIE6, fly tlw sabn:irr£on -f tr:tr I-' #, t"s:a bidder, offeror, applicant, sAlipltcable to 11 cotltrscts. (2) out:contrncts, and (.) or subcontrar:.ir ••ert.:ies the: he daatr riot r,:ainta►n orIre. fortis ,•s,,pt.•,eer any Orzres utc•C sac'it; any c,P*ment= w;*h ni,piicarsa who are thtnsO!•Iv.:e 1Krform:'1 r, fr•,•.rsi.' :.trr.r:eel cut.rirarsiot .rntrae:s, txeta,..n7. tiu., it t'ir{a ijat 'o.: is r• :at•':fls+ ar.:r, r rr, .:.a: h. ^.. rr n i erm't ? . en; .to er+ o . r Sir o., wtica s.re r.% e%etrpt from the provision, ••f tat Equrl i vr: arm. tr,cir r.•rvict� :.. sir.' ie_a:res, L^•;nr ror.� :there a=t;:r! stated fac£litt!•= :;: a matntain�,i. He certifier sr• : Uppor:unsty clause. r 2 ' s:ondard turn. A 'tar S••-r. I:;•. --I r t I they that he vnll tiet maintain or provide for his employ,ea prior to tho award of mubcontrnrtr exreeding s�10,000 which af•y re;truFtatad faeiistlrr U ally of his oat4mithmegte, unit arc rot exentpfrom tho frotho prow:o£�.na of thrs l;quu Oppqrtunity t'c,ia ne wai not pernot hie emplo oao to )turfortn their evtz'fr, a c:L:,ao l that lie will retain rush certifications in file MOO; Ot my location, under isle control, where soggeeegate(I facihtica and that be will forward the following notice to such pre• fire maustained. The bidder, offeror, a iplicant or oubeon- Posed aubcoritrnetort Qmci•pt where the proposed oubcon- tractor agrees that is breach of this Cortii£catlon js a violation tractors have tsubmitted identical certifications for opecif£c of the Equal Opportunity clause in this contrast, As uped in time periods) qalf eartitleation, the term "owmagated facilltion" munns any ttlliq rooms, work Orono, rest rooma and wants rooms, roo. !tenet: To rttnnrY. IM, 10,31CONTRAC.TQRn OF ACQUIRt'. ENT FOR rants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and MiTIVICAT110NR OF NOKONORMATE.0 FACILiTIES other otorave or drera:ng areas, parking lots, drinking foun• A Cvr:fAeation of Konsof rrgateQ Fnctittfos moat be soh• trans, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and matted rlor to the award igm subcontract Facilities be housing facilities provided for employees which are segre• p g ,000 gated by explicit directive or are in fact segreggated on the which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Oppor- basis of race, color, religion, or national or£Kln, beeausio tunity clause, The certification may be oubmittod either for of habit, local Custom. or otherwise. He further agrees that each subcontract or for all subcontracts during is period (i,e,, (except where he has obtained identical certification# from quarterly, somiarrually, or annually), grin id�iiticai certifications fromcproposeedlosubcontractors is prescribed In 18 I;)ACenalty s 01.tng false statements in offers 07 ,—T1je penalty /or making fulne ntntrtnente its offers ie ffrnorlbed in lA Miff,1001, INSTRUCTIONS 1. Whenever the, tease is executed by an attorney. agent, and title of the oMeer or other person signing the lease on or trustee on behalf of the Lessor, two authenticated coislot Its behalf, duty attested, and, if requested by the Government of his rrimer of attorney, or other evidence tm act oft belsalf evidence of this authority so to act shall be furnished, of the Iussor. shall accompany the lease, d, When deletions or other alterations are made specific 2, Wkf n the Lossor In a partnership, the names of the notation thereof shall be entered under eloune 0 of the tease pamnert composing thq firm shall he stated in the body of the before s£11nirg, loamTt.e . lawle shall be 91smod w£ h the partnership name, followe i by the name of the partner sliming the same, 8, If the property teased is located in a State requiring 2, «hero the Lessor is a corporation, the lease shall be the recording of leases. the Leasor ohall comply with all such signed with the corporate name, followed by the signature statutory requirements at Lesfor's expense, Paragraph 11 of the General Provision entitled "Examination of Records" is amended by deleting the entire paragraph and substituting therefore the following% (a) This clause is applicable if the amount of this contract exceeds 010,000 and was entered into by means of negotiation, iticluding small business re¢trieted ..iadvertising, but is not applicable if this contract was entered into by means of formal advertising. (b) The Lessor agrees that the C ;:rr!16r Goners: of the United States or any of Itis duly authorized representatives shall, until the ezpirotion of 3 years after final payment under this contract or such lesser time specified in the Federal Pro- curement Regulation Part 1-20, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Lenoor involving transactions related to this contract. (e) The Lessor further agrees to inclt;de in all hit subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that the subccntrac:or agree that the Comptroller General of' the United States or any of hie duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiralon of 3 yearn after final payment under the subcontract or such lcseer time -pccificd in the Federal Procurement Its- ulat:er.n Prrt 1-20. hove access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent 'caois, documents# papers, and records of .such nubcontrrctor, involving tranoaetiono rcla:ed to the 9;;bc0ntr4et, The torn. 1#vubcontract" as #cod in thin clause excludes (1) purcha:lc ordcrs not exceeding $10,00 and (2) subcontracts or purchase orders for public utility services at rc:ub established for uniform applicability to the general public. H tT—sfM1eM�11 17, DISPUTES (a) This lease is subject to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-563). (b) Except as provided in the Act, all disputes arising under or relating to this lease shall be resolved in accordance with this clause. (c) (i) As used herein, "claim" means a written demand or assertion by one of the parties seeking, as a legal right, the payment of money, adjustment or interpretation of lease terms, or other relief, arising under or relating to this lease. (it) A voucher, invoice, or request for payment that is not in dispute when submitted is not a claim for the purposes of the Act. However, where such submission is subsequently not acted upon in a reasonable time, or disputed either as to liability or amount, it may be converted to a claim pursuant to the Act. (iii) A claim by the Lessor shall be made in writing and submitted to the contracting Officer for a decision. A claim by the Government against the Lessor shall be subject to a decision by the Contracting Officer, (d) For Lessor claims of more than $50,000, the Lessor shall submit with the claim a certification that the claim is made in good faiths the supporting data are accurate and complete to the boot of the Lessor's knowledge and beliefs and the amount requested accurately reflects the lease adjustment for which the Lessor believes the Government :s liable. The certification shall be executed by the Lessor if an individual, When the Lessor is not an individual, the certification shall be executed by a senior company official in charge at the Lessor plaat or location involved, or by an officer or general partner of the Lessor having overall responsibility for the conduct of the Lessor's affairs. (e) For Lessor claims of $50,000 or less, the Contracting Officer must render a decision within 60 days, For Lessor claims in excess of 950,000, the Contracting Officer must decide the claim within 60 days or notify the Lessor of the date when the decision will be amde, (f) The Contracting Officer's dociyion shall be final unless the Lessor appeals or files a suit as provided in the Act, (g) The authority of the Contracting officer under the Act does not extend to clait►s or disputes which by statuty or regulation other agencies of the Executive branch of :he federal are c%presrty authorized to decide-. (h) Interest or. the amount found due on a Lessor claim shall be paid frost the date the claim is received by the Contracting Officer until the date of payment. Interest on the amount found due on a Government claim shall be paid from the date the claim is received by the Lessor until the date of pavmunt� Snterest shall be computed at ton percent (10*1 per anrum on the b:,siss of a 365 or 366 day year, whichever applies. S:andard F,rn : xav 1970 Zd!ticn 4.� . r.ir .w — -'r's •ry - r - r • :ice ._ _ _ _ r• (i) Except as the parties may otherwise agree, pending final resolution `F of a claim by the Lessor artaing under the lease, the Lessor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the lease and its toxins in ae,cordanco with - the Contracting Officer's decision. 18. The Losaor will not be reimbursed for any services not provided for in this lease, including but not limited to repairs, alterations or overtime services, nor will any rental be paid for occupancy, in whole or in part except for the lease term specified in Paragraph 2 heroin, unless approved in advance by the Contracting Officer. 19, Any holding over after the expiration of the term of this lease, or any . renewal or extension thereof, shall be considered to be a tenancy from month to month, and shall K herwio6 be on the same terms and conditions as herein specified. �1j3�ir „ � r i 1:. J.. Standard Form 2 • %ay 1970 Edicior. i i CITY OF KENIAI "Cliff (?a#, l 4 4, u4a„ I. O. &OX 000 KINA1. ALAOKA 99611 TILIINONI 403 . 7555 f June 10, 1983 Mr, Thomas J. Busker Contracting Officer Department of Transportation federal Aviation Administration Alaskan Region 701 C Street, Box 14 _ Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Dear Mr. Buskers , J The City of Kenai is pleased to present to the Federal Aviation , Administration a proposal to construct and lease an Automated Flight Service Station in the City of Kenai, located on or ! , adjacent to the Kenai Municipal Airport for $1.00 per your with 7; an option for twenty one-year lease..extensions. The City has had time to examine the plans and specifications formulated by the R4 FAA and can promise a facility which would meet with the FAA's approval. We can, at this time, assure the FAA that the proposed building i would meet all of the requirements for on"vironmental considerations and the standardization of design desired by the FAA. The shell and exterior finish work would satisfy the FAA's desire for an attractive, comfortable and energy efficient office facility. Private and public support for locating the AFSS in KennL has dictated that the City do everything in its power to secure thn location of thin regional facility at the Kenai Municipal Airport. The City'o tentative time achodule in an followos - 1. Subminnion of proposal by June 15, 1903. 2. The award of tale Flight Service Station to the successful bidder in `ovember of 1903. 3. Should the City of Kenai be oucce3nsful in its proposal the City in proposing occupancy by November 1, 1985, or at a later date an may be determined by the FAA. -141--� n. I r Aloo eontnined in thin proposal under the title of Exhibit ®, the City has provided information Vint will indicate to the FAA that �+ money is readily availabltt nod that there are three altarnativeo which the City might follow in order to fund the facility no laid out by thin proposal. The City Council, in op"cial nenoton on 3anuary 12, 1983 pooeed the following motions "Tho City Council diracto the City Administration to proceed to finalize and oubmit a focilitioo proposal to the FAA per diacu+sainna hold in executive oeeoion the evening of January 12, 190311. Sincerely, i m. J. Brign n City Manager • WJB/dg E nclooures i C f ' ' a I i ' IN RESPONSE TO oATao PROPOSAL. TO LEASE SPACE SOLICI R TION > DTFA04-83-L-83003 October 27, 1982 ON The offeror SgrM upon acmptanoe of this proposal by the date soecified, to tease to the United States of America, the premises as dwAbod and upon the terms specified, in comptlance with and subject to the provisions of Stove Solicitation, with attachmeom SECTION 1 • PREMISES DESCRIPTION It aUILOINA NAME AW AOOALSe 00whad y ZIP•od0l I NQT USANLB SPACE IN IINTIP6 BUILDING Building - New Refer to Exhibit A, A-1 and A-2 for 16019PIG9 e,610011409 proposed location and site plan, 9981,, + 490 as,m 4 v n I )cnry type vid nu e t of fl uve feell Operationn, automation equipment, machanien a.NNMYLA 0/ rtOOAe s, TYPL 0� GONDTAUGTION One ( bour equipment, foyers, conference, telephone, communication, break room, reception, trai 6IVG F1O A LOAD cAP^CIITY II116/0e, L) , WI IN A �+ T•N-briefin 660 Fig unra feet SECTION It - SPACE O/PORED AtNO RATS r/d 0/ OFFER NET, tllRABLL Ss+ACB raov&V fNl/ bt INITIAL TEAM PBNE,MAL 8 M eAVAA6 /DOT AAT9ILA VLAA Igs AMOUNT (Cob (I)/�1)) et eA6IAAe IOAT AATi PgA V9J1A M AAMOUNT at MAW) le1 7. NET Refer to SE bit G $ Ke er to Exhibit G ear to $ Exhibit G $1.00 (per ears IL GROSS ' 9,10,11 Reserved, 12 Spoce will be attend in accordance with spscificetiont and ready for occupancy li/1/8S _. ff 13. a Number of parking 106COS for the entire building which are under control of offstaf 90 11feconoary, b. Number of parking foaees to be furnished for use by Government employees up to fat I is G. It file parking spaco Chown, in item j above, are orovided beAuse of local law Or Mulation reQuirements, and no 'charge for parking is intended Abrt Ain d. If there it 10 tW a Charge lot GOVIIAMe111 empleyoel' parking, Show the amount that well k char ed for each parking place $ Mono IL SECTION ill • LEASE TERMS/ALTERNATES INITIAL LEASE 15, RENDVAL OPTIONS e'A MINIMUM P94IAO ' 1 MO. OP r Aja t1t1"/A 4 YAOM /p,,I) 6TO (0010 to YLAAS LAG/I bNUMSLA Co OPTIONS INS OOVLAN4,LNf Y i;-i-fi7 0-30-87 ONE 20 ld Aai A:r MITiC R>;:IEIM . 06 D A'i TLAMINATe LW6 3()0 TIL D z-31-83 { • L NA iou(sen reophnuible for the coot of utilitieu, building maintenance, grounds meintvnenre* � and the operation of the building. Any alteratlontl, improvements, additions), or ropitlro after conuumution of the lerise Ilhnll be lit Leasaeola expentae. Lessor will be responsible for !snow removal from the parking; area, and provide inaurance on the building'-,. l � ` k pfe"106681 some (# vd„wi,'O.O&W I+!list If,** es Iwq �•t c __-_ .i'. - __ - - • __. __ Nam. A00M.11M.I. TO V110110 M, TO .I,F,itiSE SPAC 3 VOPH aOLLCLTN'63,33 /10. DTFA04-83A-83003 OPTIw�t3 - The offaror may includes one or both of the foLLowing options no past of t::a offer by aLaninF, under the apuctfie option. i Ontian 1 - Tranafar of Title - Full right, tit La, and intaraot in and to the lalaod facility 6-0703j Whalt be conveyed by this Lnaoor to the FAA, for conoi3eration of one dollar ($1.00), upon receipt by the lessor of a notice from the FAA to ao do. Thu affectiva data of such transfer shall be the fist day after the expiration of the initial team and all lasoa• renoval periods or ouch subsequent date as msy be determined by the lessee (FAA). Any such notice by the lessee shall be provided to Cho lessor at least ninety (90) days in advance of the effective date of tranafer and shall specify ouch date. The lessor further agrees to lease the asneciatad land, parking aroan and aeceso roads, which oupport the leased facility, to the FAA without coat for a period of twenty (20) years. • Lessor I acoc ignatuca Option Z — Renewal -'the FM may, at its ooze option, snow Chia lease for additional lease periods beyond the firaa tor. and renewal periods spa- r, cified in Item 3 (Tor.) of this offers provided that the FAA notifiao the(. ; lessor in writing„ at least ninety•(90) days prior to aspiration of the jazz renewal tens in the laasa', that the lease will be so renewed uldar the t ria of this option. Rental under this option will be at no coot to the 7/tA or at a nominal rate (one dollar $1.00) par annun with the FAA only paying for services, utilittao and structural csaintanance of the prumians. Of sic* JLZa.stura C JIS�ty,1 orA;, I�C1c. 114/1 WE 50LICP7a1TI0NFOR OFFiAS rF0 V0. 0Tr A04 5i:C710t1 S J.L_a3� 1fi:,:itUCTIONS AND 703 PR—vPAAATIO!l TILE FOLLOWING MUST 9E CMlVLZ.dD BY L%C:1 OFFEROR, THE PAGZ(S) RV.OVED FR.II Mill SOLZC:TATtOIN, I.11TIALLED, ATTAC:IED TO Tl1E PROPOSAL TO LZASZ SPACE, AND RETUMED TO THE FAA OFFICE OESCMED ELa"E'dllEi 1 THE OFTZROR iERTI?IES THAT: (A) ANY FACILITY TO BE UTLLIZZO IN 1E PERFO?»IA!;CZ OF Tii:S CClf ?.AC T PAS , HAS !f0T �/ , BEE:i LISTED ON Ci'llROlfh-V.';TAL i'�.�:IOII AGZNC'f-LTA: OF VIOLATING FAMITIZS; (B) HE WILL PROHPTL'l NOTIFY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER, PR:CR .3 AWARD, OF 4dE RECZIPT OF ANY CC.-M-NICATION FRO:I THE OFFICE OF M A:S ISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENFORCEMENT lrXIMO.'b.°ENTAL PQ.O ZC:tO:i AGENCY, 401 H STP.EZT, S.W., VASiit.fC.C.i, O.C. 20460, LIMICATING T1tAT ANY FACLITY WHICH HE PROPOSE3 TO USE FOR MIZ PERFCILMA:iCZ OF THE CMMRACT• IS U:r&EZ CC:NSIRERATIO:N TO BE LISTED 0!1 TiM EPA LIST OF VIOLATING FACILITIES; ' (C) IM STILL to'CLUDE SUBSTMIMALLY MS CERTI7IC=00, VICL:;DING MIS PARAGRA?lt (C), IN EVERY lfGc E!.°OMPT SL3C..li •9M'�C.I TIM OFFIZZOR CZ?.TI?IZS THAT HE, IS IS NOT �t/-,._ A S'.VsLL PIUSINE33 CC:iCZR!i. OE71l1Z710l AND APPLICABLE SHALL AUSIlNTES3 STANDARD THE TEM SMALL BUSIME33 CO SC?::.N :!FANS A CONMICN, INCLUOL.-M ITS As FILITATE3, 'WHICH IS INDEPP..IDElNTLY V-':;ZD AND OP'ZRATED, 13 :fOT *C!lINANT I!N VE FI'1.L3 OF LZASING CO.'rMItCIAL REAL ESTATE AND M5 A'!'r: iC7 A M'sll RXMIPTS FOR THE PREMLDENG TH?.ZZ FISCAL YEA30 63F` NOT MORE TflAl 52 HELLION- (13 CYR 121.3-3). 141. PARAGRAPH COMPLZ:1011 142, CLEAN AIR CERTIF'NATION 143. SMALL BUSINESS ; CERTIFICATION I .'.5....5 ,I o. bl ..A.rs �10I 97 iC,r.9 • y 'i✓ e � , n i �'�' 'j`�(''�, OFFERS FO '110. pTFA(i-*# ShfXu4J�ii ir i l6JiO83-L-fI::CO3 ' OT:sOCTiOtts httD i (A) T3E OASRROR a. r.l^IES TO T:L° BEST OF HIS LHOWLENZ T.L%:.-. wri:i1L`i 3 YZ—%XS PRIOR i0 'rA DATE OF TaIS r. AND/OR ANY OF ITS OFFIC$:ta AND PRINCIPAL MQLDY% S R°SYO:tSZBLF, FOR OBTAINVNG OR AD401STERLNG A CC:iA".UC Z4SL'L:::iC NCH THIS SOLICITATIO:i. (1) ":' ( ) 1A'J8 .'OT (✓f SE',.Y CC:iViCTED OF: (1) A CiM NAL OF?+:iSE WC13CO.: TO A PUBLIC 03 ?R:VA:y C.;b:RAC: OR SL'3C04TRAC. T:iE?.Z=ZR; (II) A VICLATION OF TAZZ ORGANIZED CRI:M CwN-& OL ACT OF 1970; (II:) A 7IOLV,"108 OF TE FEDE?.AI. ANTITRUST $.A::':ZS A3:S::iC Cr* CF 7AE SUBMISSION OF BIDS OR P?.OPOSALS •, (I'J) LY.BE*.Z "w:iT OR FRAUD OR z4UIVALZ:iT CILHES S+'d:C3 ARE L'iDICAT:7E OF A LACX OF BUSZESS (2) HATE () SAVE NOT (v)BEEN DE3A;MZD OR SUSPEN CZO F'RG ! 032' A•JA-U OF PUBLIC CO:IT?.ACTS. (3) LIME HAVE NOT (VfRa A PUBLIC CO:iTRACT 4Z:t:iL'iATS9 FOR DEFAULT. rr (3) a G:sT:?ICATIO:i T'?.AT ANY OF THE IT«::S IN (A) ABOVE Z:CST WILL NOT :'ZCZSS.4'LIL'l RESULT I:1 TdE WI:5:I1OL 00 OF AN AV= 17.bZ:: -.1.3 SOLICI:ATI00. HOWEVER, THE CZRTIFIC.%TIO.'i WI:.:. 8E C0:151=2.0 S.IZI —ME DE- ZIMI:iA:109 OF AN OFFZROW S ?=P4:iS131LI I. OFFZ".ORS lov= FALL TO FWIS:i Ti1E CZR::7LC:.::C:i AND P?O7IDF. SUCII ADDITIONAL NFL ILMTION AS RZgUE3.Z2 BY :..? G::iT:iAC:I:iG OFFIC%R WILL SOT BE FOUND 144. CZI?!ES AID DEBALNE!'M • CERTIFICATION I= !' ir47r. .11 � rii A�ii��.��+�'�.� �./'y. t1 / �I .wY�i �1f► �' 97 1C� / l m . f CAE f EXHIBIT A J .r) - In roolionoo to tine Fodnrnl Aviation Administration's solicitation for offers - SFO #DTFA04-83-L-03003 the City of Kenai, Alaska is making the following proposal: The City of Kenai, Alaska will construct a now unnamed building of 100000 square feet to the specifications of the FAA to aeeomodate the AFSS facility for southcontral Alaska in the City of Kenai, Alaska on one of throe proposed sites in this solicitation to be determined by the FAA. The throe following locations have boon prioritized in the order it is felt would be moot desirable to the FAA. Three sites are being proposed in order to give the FAA the most leeway and flexibility in making a determination as what best suits their needs from available land on and/or adjacent to the Kenai Municipal Airports 1. General Aviation Apron 112 Tract A - 209 Willow Street This location would nave accessibility both by vehicle and foot traffic from the terminal complex. It would also provide the FAA with public visibility. It has street access on two eidoe and has all utilities avail- able. In addition, the emergency power generator for the Kenai Municipal Airport is located approximately 400 foot from this proposed site. This site contains approximately 2.02 acres with the possibility of being expanded to 2.83 acres. 2. Etolin Subdivision 3rd Addition Lots 13 & 14 - locntes on Hain Street ae[toad _-;__ffo_­atreot numbers Savo been alloEotod to these particular lots at the present time. This site is located directly across the street from the CAP hangar and would provide aecossiblity for the majority of the Kunni boned light aircraft. Those lots also faca a paved street and have all utilities avail.abin. This site contains approximately 2.57 acres. 3. F(10 Suhdivinion T1lork 2 Lots 7 h A - 6211 and GSfi hollow Strout - these luLo contain approx mssttsly giros. One of the ponaihle advantagoa of this aron is that it is located directly across the street from this prunosnt air trnffir control Tower. The site is ratan in clone proximity to the lnrga aircraft on the Kenai Hunicipat Airport. The city will provide on any one of tile, three proposed sites 90 parkinq ,spnces) for the Ars,; facility. frhibit A-1 shows all three propossnd tots on separate shoots with their dimensions and Exhibit A-2 is a map showing all three lots an-1 their proximity to the Kenai Municipal Airport. J I a � , I i I ILL 0 r- r , . w All throe Oita locationn that are hoing proposed on or near the Kenai Airport are on paved Otranto with water, newer, gne, electricity and phony norvicu nvnLlnblo. Any one of the three locations would give the FAA-AFSS aubatantial oxpnnoibility and public visibility plum provide aceeao to pilots for weather briefings and flight planning functiona. Those locationo all have onay occaun to and from all parto of the city and all porto of the airport plun hnvinsl higc�hway season. The current flight Service Station at Kenai Is Mandy operating in a somewhat j automated mode providing advisory service for tho entiro i peninsula, Kodiak Iolnnd, Illimmno, and Loko Clark P000 ar000. The FAA currently maintaino on emergency operational facility (EOF) on what to referred to on FAA bluff property in Kenai. This facility to on a standby booio to be operated should some sort of catastrophe randar inoperative or make the Anchorage offices unusable. Our unduratnnding of the pr000nt plan is to got proper peroonnol to man the EOF no soon no possible. If the AFSS were located in Kenai, aufficiont manpower would be readily ovailoble to bring the EOF operational in minimal time. The EOF also hen HF radio communications capable of ranching no for so Vloohington, O.C. It should aloo be noted that any one of the site propocalo has tho•ability to provide adequate or oubotantial expansion not only to the building, but also to the proposed parking facilitiaa. •S+`y� The City will construct the 10,000 oqunre foot building on the r! alto selected by the FAA. It to the City'o intent to hold the •, eonotruction canto to $1.5 million. Should the low bidder on the eonotruction of the building exceed $1.5 million the FAA would be expoctod to pick up any overage or any exasou of $1.5 million for the structure. The City will then leuoe the facility to the FAA for $1.00 a year with 20 one-year renewals. If Kanni to Collected as the city in which Elio AFSS to going to be locntod an ena of the niter; in thin proponnt, the City will give oonuranosea that Elio rink of eviction or forced rotocation is nit. It ohout,l be noted that it in the City'o intent to construct the bullolinil to the i AA'a oo)eciriratlone, hoot uoidor the ordinancoa, rodeo, rulssii sold ruqulnEtona under whials the City operates. It ahoutd atop he noted that thin propnnnl to #specifically oul)Ject to o:anfirinatinn unit nrrnptnncu by the Kenai City Council. Furthsor, thio proprsonl to oul) ject to all of the oppllcabtco lows, ordlnnncan, rulna an.l requintiono including, boot not limited Lot the Clinker of Eliot City of Kanni, Alaska and Kenai Hunicipal Code. . i t000mpoot �f1A `i31 ��,y1 I'l, i•,,•l,, I'�1, � I ' ♦' I ,' , �I . p;.i r N /IrM all MY , Avgr fits) 1,�•.i'''• i! , .�.i, IlrAdrlWl' Nr1Ali1• to �. .0 , to ,,� • too�' 0 ; ,. ' r' ��.. r . r r r .o r Nr ,iV •., •fly,' • , H/ap , ,/ ,i J%itf :��� "JI�A � i.•/ �, ..r„ ! r, t ,/1,IrA,I. ',,,; 4+r ,I� , t: i,sif �, l "•r ,' let�I I t, /; i , . „I il') �'� j �� •, t0'Mhlr 11uM•1 y4 4( '•• , •*. M,/ w/RlidUl 1 ij H3 = .,.+(Y: o,Mp �`• 4,��., • :.:! .� J N� �.`"...,�' tom.'_-„�t .i t:•� .t 6 a - , y � •� Y'� I N•�� � YIII4M%� ; Via ...,., r . j. to do MY Ul 1, lot 1 ' ,: j � ,' � ,,,(I,y1r•1'I �IVnI s r•'•I II � _ � , f •� l (1I, lotr to ;' 6,: t /�I II I (!, �'!•'.n„i,,...i'./'�� t,'•/' !.' . / ycap /gYlil,•I �i `0 ,/ IA IFr, .,,�^' •(@�Y,�•Y.s,'! ,1/dn to P J. 1)Iw,W 11 ( i I � Ivrlarlrt nr r,/r(�',��rA f•CI31�Ii1'itL ' ' of 4194111t Ilr(�/1fA�011ML I INtA66l (1,A11/11MIf lost tflr N10 66641l'09O1110011,fIMr Rd t,rl A /d// ►oh (BOK111r 6Nhu 6A1nf ALL {1{I r6N1� /0 f%av Of yr10, ANON, Also M6t106At6r 11,6 ust %OAN, • .,., ' _ '1� I is, r„��';, ,',,'•.s, Antos, , to ' • ,w frlWaf I•1 Y'1 llf,/.I�,i,InM //,� 11„11 N,l•Ir! /yTA/%• / /M ..ter , �u1Dot MCA— 6.41N 10 0(IOAt YL IMIt M' f1- /YC:tAI{60 Also •!I � 11 )!. ,. it2", , 6I r i 5 i 1 i,lf.1,•t hot✓ I:�, b.A.r� _ � f � �...w.� I ' , tArr116....6Z1 I,/ CLdd14i154/ • •'rl i{Ar Arno/Av�� • rn16 I/ At 11i11 Arr.wt60r lot 014AI rl Y•� 1 • es,,ro,4N . rolegla6 tidi/,f4iGa If rrq, W i to's N .rL/ If j.II1% rtNAl /t•rrN!/tA rl'l•%' I'l '/ �rr,f%lr/ F, glagl1 All •hi 1� 71, �� •r 1 r' Owl�, �^•. �1 000 10 < Ay / ' °• , Ocor9'1.......ONC r �' 12 F��! � I �, %fir � � +`� ~� ••�' 1 `. 14. , 4c6c- =7ZZ)) 1 r / J ter+ / / ,• ?� 7 1 G7' .�;/,.. //� OF I'1 /• Q, 9i•,y �• 'f••`� it /,� S,� + i }•• • •b`y ' ,'�•• (/ V 'lip Ar IRA.'fib r /' i it I• 9 w JNA ;.� Al 19 44 If C•ti•7 Vet, /«•♦r, � Iry• ,i.,, • +•, / , Irk 1, r f • ` / ' eO % S off 10 o i , i «• t. �, t; �� � • j3/ is r r i EXiiII1It C IRPORI CHARACTERISTICS Kenai Airport to an FrA cortificnted non -hub airport that serves as a regional airpor for tine Kenni Peninsula and is oleo used as a weather alternate by 'Wien, Western and Alaska Airlines for Boeing 727 and 737 aircraft. Tile airport currently consists of a 7600'xl5O' osphnit runway serviced by throe 75' taxiways end a 16001050' terminal/parking apron. The general aviation area consists of throe 36' taxiways. Airport equipment consists of a 1982 Oahkosh T-6 CFR truck and various pieces of snow removal equipment including a 1982 rotary (high speed) snow blower. Anticipated and planned projects ores terminal apron overlay (1983), itinerant aircraft parking extension (1983), extend parking apron 1200' (requested to the State and FAA), extend north taxiway to north end of runway - 2500' (requested to FAA). The airport terminal is presently undergoing a 10,000 square foot expansion/renovation project, Number of airfield operations: 1979 - 78,617 1980 - 80,294 1901 - 91,030 1902 - 78,699 Boned sircrafts single •engine - 83 twin engine - 15 (2 turboprops) helicopter - 13 transport% - 3 (2 C-119, 1 DC-3) T4i Passoonger onplannrnonLus 19110 - 60,000 1981 - 07,069 19112-103,633 i;ilMPA i 1111 L I T Y• 11 iII O nwit r AA I;ENCRAL AY I A i I ON PROGRAMS Knnni Alrpnrt is rurrl!ntty nerved by a Lavnl 1 ml Air Trarfic Control Tua,sr and n 24 hour F l iliht. Service Station. In addition tq radio navigntI,nnnl airla, o*ofnmunir.aLLoil , a t e P at Nana I, Homer and 1soWntna airprirta, Kenni 1'nr.ilitian 1•inintennnco (FAA) mnintain•s the AJI IrC radars at 'di l-hraud and tti,irit.stnn Inland anti I•s to oji:sls:nu mainwan ineq re!;pnn'i ibi t ity for the St. h:irr► rndir in 19F;3, .11:in, ihl! rAA Ciortro11!ncy Opurational Facility ;i'u•lian'it 01*f ice!) to tic! manned in Lim /!vant of disisleter or , nn it sllncy is incat,itd in t!ir• rac:l it it!a Maintenance compound in Untis. Y.1±nrii airnui•L iz rs:sert by t)tulient piloto in the sou"s c-!ntral Aln•:i:) ar•s.1 °.,r t!se!ir-ra,is-seatintry checks. etc. ::100 1-11"I' If the 'iir^1)rt. it21 c''•iract•!rt stit!:: Jnd faaiIiti*ls. ' I r 1 Ir rr r � I J 9 EX111111T 8 QUALITY OF T11C COMMUNITY AND BACKGROUND BACKGROUND The City of Kenai is located on the northwestern Kenai Peninsula about 60 miles south of Anchorage, Alaako's largoat city. Kenai, often called the "Oil Capitol of Amorica", is in the proceen of experiencing moderate growth. With the development of the oil end gas industries in the area, Kenai has become the center for oil industry service and supply activities. As the second oldest permanent settlement in Alaska, Kenai's history is colorful. Prior to the establishment of the Russian military and fur -trading outpost Fort St. Nicholas at the mouth of the Kenai River in 1791, the Kenai area was populated by eavoral Konaitze Indian villages. Fishing, furs and mining wore the base for the economy. Kenai in 1950 had a population of 321 and woo the only settlement In the area. The U.S. Army established a communications center just north of Kenai in the early fifties. With tho completion of the Sterling and Kenai Spur Highways in the mid-fiftioe access to the entire west side of tho.poninaula encouraged increased recreational use of the area. Passage of the Veteran's Homeatead Act also had a significant impact on settlement in the.area. With the discovery of commercial quentitien of oil and goo on the western lowlands of the Kenai Peninsula and offshore in Cook Inlet in 1957, the history of the Kenai aroa changed dramatically. Development of both oil and gas reserves and a petrochemical complex in North Kenai at Nikiaki skyrocketed both the population and the oconomy'of the area. The City of Kenai is a blend of the most up -to -data bualnoso and service catabliahments with the most exciting aspects of Alooka's wilderness close at hand. Soma of the world's mont fabutouo fishing and hunting is minutes from the city. CLIMATE The Kenai aroa lion within to tronnitians;l climate zone infiueneod by bath mneittmn and continental faetorn. Data eollectod at the Kenai Airport over thn pant 35 yasirs indleaten an overage annual procipitntion of 19.9 Inchon, with tho greatest amaunt occurring In August and 3aptembar. The mcsn annunt snowrall is 69.7 inchon. Tempt:rnturna range from an overage minlmurn of 3.7°F in 3anuary to an average mn%mourn of 61°F in duly, with a record low of -48°F and a rers,r.i high of H9°F. Its,- lent spring froute generally oreurz '4ay 31, nnil the fir9t fail freeze is alsnut Auhs;s;t 28, renssitinj in n front-froo period of approicima;totly 90 days. E PuPULATION TRENDS CITY Oi' KENAI 1950-1902 Your City of Kenai Percent Change 1950 321 ---90 1960 778 1420,0 1970 3,533 354% 1980 4,324 2215 1982 5,232 200 SOURCES U.S. Bureau of the Census and Kenai Peninsula Borough PONILATION Today the Kenai area population is 93 percent Caucasian, with Alaska Natives representing 5 percent. Other ethnic groups make up 2 percent of the population. As is typical of most of the Stato, the Kenai area has a very small proportion of senior citizens. According to the 1960 census the population consists of the followings 2 percent over 65 ysnra; nine percent under 5 years; 28 percent under 14 years and 31 percent between 20 and 34 years. In contrast the Statewide figures shows 3 percent over 65 yooral 10 percent under 5 years and 34 percent in the age category 20 to 34 yeare.� ECON0I4Y The economic base of the Konoi area has expanded grently'since tho 1960's. Today the economy is based on the oil and gas induatrics, fishing and fish processing and the touriain and rerrention induutriao. With tho development of oil and goo, a dofinito goographic differontiotinn in ocoosumic functions among the mn�n canters of population hnn occurred. Tho City of Kenai and its noighbaring Nikinki-North Konal nron has bueama the nonLor not only for oil and qua rolotad inrdu+striva, but the hub of trncdo and eoininarca for the wantorn pisninsula. (.a r ,� i -- M . 011. AND CAS When the Richfield Ail Corporntion discovered natural gas in the Swanson River area in 1957, the Kenai orao became the center for the oil and gas industry in Alaska. To date this area ranks so the moot diversified region in Alaska in terms of its oil and goo related development. Installation in the Kenai vicinity include a full range of oil field service and supply companies. A vast network of pipelines has boon installed to collect crude oil and natural goo. There are also treatment facilitieo, refineries, a potroehomcial and on LNG plant. Marine facilities have boon developed for transfer of crude oil and natural goo and for support for offshore operations. Kenai is the source of product pipelines to Anchorage area utilities. The Kenai aroo's hydrocarbon production also supplies the Anchorage area. FISHING AND FISH PROCESSING A diversified harvest of fish and shellfish supports a largo fishing fleet and processing plants in the central Kenai Peninsula area. Although there are large yearly fluctuations and varying market conditions, -In 1980 income from commercial salmon and shellfish catches in the Cook Inlet management area amounted to nearly $24 million. Ninety percent of the commercial salmon fisheries in the central district of Upper Cook Inlet is sot and drift gillnot fishing. The Upper Cook Inlet's annual harvest averages about four times the yield of that in the Lower Cook Inlet. Although salmon harvouta tend to alternates between high and low years, the value of Cook Inlet's salmon harvest in 1900 was over $15 million occording to Alaska's Department of Fish and Game. TOUR151-1 AND RMICATION The cussatal strip of wosturn Kenai Ponino ula baLwoen Kenai and Hesnsir is I,ho most intensively used outdoor recreation area in the State. The economic impact of the viuitor indunl;ry tondo to conrontente in the Konssi area ass the point, of across to the recrantionnt artinss of the northuessl• sucLion of the Peninsula. Vi,,sitar purchssssrsn tend to conrontroto in this category of .hirlhway-rat.atnsl services sinus moot travot in the area is auto and reterentionat vehieta. Althotigls t,nurissn Is highly aeaaonal in nntursr, the econnmie impact of tits+ inJuntry to impressive. :y vc. low x KENAI-COOK INLET DIVISION � INSURED IMAGE AND SALARY EMPLOYMENT 1900• Industrial Sector Empinyment Percent Total Mining 732 10 Construction 540 8 Manufacturing 1295 18 Transportation# Communi- cations & Utilities 622 9 Ylholneale Trade 264 4 Retail Trade 951 13 Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 190 3 Services 994 14 Governments 1410 20 Federal (118) (2) State and Local (1292) TOTAL 7064 100.0 14 *First throe quarters of 19.80 only. SOURCEI Situation and Proapecta, Kenai Peninoula Oorough, 1982 KENAI-COOK INLET CENSUS DIVISION�'� AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGES PER WORKER 1981 IncluoLry Sector Annual Wage Mining $37,548 Construct ion 29,760 Hnnufru;Lnrinn 22,224 Trtiniport,ntion, Communientianst, anti Utilitien. 41,640 41hn1•Irjnla Trade 26,784 Retail Trans 12,612 Fissnnn•i, Innuranca, Rant Catntu 150400 Sa ry icau 1796811 Govirrnwants Fodstral. 24,516 State and Local 22,644 01j"CEI SitUnt inn and Pr,supuctrs, Kcnzsi 1,111jinssula 1lurnslgh, 1902 1JT IL i T ll:S/CUt4r4UN ICAT IONS Itle Y..en,Ii artia luvs well developed and modern utility and communi- r,1;;sns Gont?rally, utility syntema have been ovor-builf�, ens haya camaiderasla potential for abuorption of now gr,-)wt'+. Pcrn:spa •cast sirnificants frvn an economic standpoint is the avoilnhility of relisblo electric power and telephone service. Togathv:r, thono oyntema provide an extromely powerful inducement for the location of now butsinnau and industry in the central poninsula oron. Kenai's eowago treatment plant oporatea at 60% of capacity and the cantor systom operatoo at about 65% of capacity. CITY Of KENAI MONTHLY SEWER AND WATER RATES 1902 Residential Water Sewer Ono or two family recidenco, single or double unit apartments and one or two trailers on a oingle lot or court - par family unit. $ 7.70 $ 18.00 Throe or more apartment units under one roof and three or more trailers on lot or court per units Single billings $ 5.80 $ 13.50 Separate billings $ 7.70 $ 18.00 Boarding houses, per room $ 3.85 $ 9.00 Cosnsnereinl (nonmetered) Domnnd ehorge (applicable when conntt:tion la larger than 1 inch) 1" $ 0.00 $ 11.00 1.25" $12.00 $ 16.00 1.5" $2(1.Of1 $ 26.00 2" ssrsd over munt be motored Una Chnrquo Car wassl►, automatic, per facility $90.50 $230,00 C1111rchsifl, 101141R11, clubs, pf►r nosh $ .00 $ .02 Doctnro and dontiutu affican, par romi or chair $ 4.70 $ 10.90 11nnolar, nirplanss rstpair $ 9.50 $ 22.75 110,tl,s, motets, rouorts, p,tr room $ 4.115 $ 11.65 Offwo Isisitdinjss, sinrylit hill by ownve, per huainstno $10.45 $ 25.15 Offia.t. in multiple office buildinq wits individssr►l tenant ltuildinil $12.10 $ 27,50 Reztnur3titi, cafes, lunch counters, t 7va!rno, bars, per icat $ .70 $ 1.65 n i 1101•ICII EI.CCTIIIC ASSOCIATION, INC. r.. RATE SCIICOUL.E BY CtIV014EI1 CLASS �► f i n Reorient ial j Customer charge $ 12.50 Energy charge tat 1000 kwh $ 4.14 per kwh Over 1000 kwh $ 3.15 per kwh 'Wholesale power cost adjustment $ .7595 per kwh Commercial Nondemand metered (under 25 kw) Customer charge $ 25.00 Energy charge •$ 4.15 par kwh Wholesale power coat adjuotment $ .7595 per kwh Demand metered Customer charge $150.00 Energy charge Under 25 kw $ .03 per kwh Over 25 kw $ 3.50 par kwh SOURC£s Alanka Public Utilities Commission, verbal communication TEI.CPIIUNI; SERVia RATES - Resislo!ntint Sarvien $36.95 installation foe, mnnthly chnrga of $19.00 La $27,01) for ones private Tina. Comens?rci.0 Stirvice $73.91) in+staltation fee, mnnl.hly chnrt)e of $25.00 to $36.00 for one private line. 4n•s hussdred and fifteen trunk linats providc lonq distance service to Kertai -and North Kenai. thirty of thetsa are two-way, 72 are ouLboulid and 13 are direct tarsal i zed inhound linen but can be :3-iitched if nutbound olainand rtstluirun. i COMMERCIAL GARpACE RATES" Kunni-Suldotna - 1982 Container Size Monthly Rentnl Par Pick -Up Chnrgo 2 yard $ 15.00 $ 8.70 6 ynrd $ 45.00 $10.00 0 yard $ 60.00 $22.33 40 yard $150.00 $62.00 *Excluding oalea tax. SOURCES Peninsula Sanitation, verbal communication CITY OF KENAI PROPERTY AND SALES TAX RATES 1978 - 1982 Proporty Tax (Hills). 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 City 13.40 12.50 9.90 4.21 2.10 Borough 4.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Central Hoopital .20 �0 .40 .51 .51 TOTAL 10.10 15.00 12.00 7.22 5.11 Salao Tax (Percent) 1978 1979 19M) 1901 1902 City of Kenai 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0ornuryh Sefilloln 2.0 2.0 2Is1 2.0 2.0 TOTAL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50011Cf : Situation 01141 prnzpoctss. V.1 nni Ilan inzuln r),srnugh, 19112 MICA r 1 aN Elemonf sry an.f necondary education in Kenai and SnIsfOLna are prrsvisfarf by tive Kornai Pr3ninnuln tioraugh School District hsa�is=isct�srr�f in 5aldoitna. rhos achn,tl di•strict'ss reapunsibility is fsirini or Leachers and onaintennnen of the school plant, white this borough's roupansibility is the ron•sLrurtion of now school rwiliti.in. Konai area arhnal childretn nret norved by four aupnrato nchool compla%uot Sears Elomentary School huilt in 1968; Konai > Eloinetntary built in 1949# with major additionn and remodeling in I ; 1763 and 19741 Kenai Junior Ilialh built in 19721 and Konai Central ' High. Thu two olamontary achooln nerve atudenta from the City of Kenai and Kalifonaky. Tho junior hir))h aervaa atudenta from Konai, North Kenai and Kalifon:sky. Studonta from Kenni, North Konal and Kalifonsky attend Kenni Central High School. SPECIAL PROGRA145 In addition to regular academic couroaa, the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District provides a wide variety of apecial prograino for Kenai and Soldotna atudenta, Title I Federal Funde provide individuralizod instruction in mathematical reading and langunge. Title IV Indian Education Funda support individualised .. .. instruction for Votive Students. Also, the borough holds classes for handicapped children from agar 2 to 21, for gifted atudenta and for atudanto with learning disabilities. If required, bi-lingual instructors are provided for atudenta whoue primary langungo is not English. Community school programs in both•Konai and Soldotna are open to all community residents. KENAI PENINSULA C01414UNITY COLLEGE Kenai Peninsula has more than 300 full-time and 700 part-time atudenta in a wide variety of degree and non-degroe programs. Claanou are held at the collage campus and in the Kenai and Soldotna public ochooln during no,nachool hours for the ' convonianre of community residents. In addition, academic, vocational/tachnicol, developmental and continuing education j cour:sno and programs are conducted by the college in moat of the Nrelnnizutf communitieu and villogna within this borough. Orancheu ' of the community collnejo are located in Soward and flomer. I Ilia community colict3n afferu cortificnte3n in office occupational i pntWess'n tnchnealogy nnet small bussinesssss msanaclemetnt, Two-yoar A.A. prnelrarnn am nft'arod to otctdnnlo tranofe•.rrinej to n four -your innt itut ion. ! KENAI/501,001,14A AREA PRIVATE SCHOOLS Name* of Sr,hnnl ' Lnr,at inn 1e02 Cnroltmank Conk Inlet Academy Soldotna fah Kal i f"nn-tsky ChcHtian School Kat i fnnaky 26 7011 Cltri:sLian iehool NiItistk1 24 ':0ct.ki Chriit.lan Schant Nikinki 70 -- will,),; C!cri!stian Schaal KaIIfonnky 60 TRIAL 274 `it)IJt'.~%: %�!h'f t !'llAmgetr of Cjm,nerce r � r . I I i� t .� , ".0 '.•, .�.� CULTURAL fAC11,1f IFS AND ACTIVITIES The number of cultural facilities and activitina available in the Konai area Is growing every year, with a concert association and an active donco group providing quality production, Kenai Community Library, the Fort gunny Historical Museum, the Old Town Gallery On artists gnllery and work ohep), Senior Citizens Program sponsored by Kenai for the entire area. HEALTH CARE. Health care in the Kenai area is provided by a combination of public, oemi-public and private organizations. Health facilities incliodes Central Peninsula General Hospital in Soldotna; the Kenai Health Center operated by the State Department of Health and Social Servicooi and the Medical Center at Wildwood administered by the Kenai Native Association. Twelve doctors and eight dentists have private offices in Kenni and Soldotna. The region's mental health program is opor'atod by the Central Peninsula Mental Health Conter in Konai, a nonprofit corporation funded by the State. Alcohol programs are provided by the Cook Inlet Council on Alcoholism in Kenai and the Cook Inlet Native Association Council on Alcoholism at Wildwood. r Central Peninsula Genoral tionpitol, located in Soldotna, serves North Kenai, Kenai, Keailof, Sterling and Cooper Landing, no well as Suldotnn. The hospital fins 43"budo and is a full-aerviee, acuto cnro facility, The emergency room includes a communicationu center tiod to the ambulance sarviceo of the variou3 cummunitien in the oervico area, air -to -ground radio and a monitnr of chonnal 9 on the+. CO radio. Thu emarejeney room is open 24 hours a day. Tho Kanni Ifnalth Center esetrvicon the ontirst Central Peninsula wren -joist offor!s n full rangy or public hanlLh nursing services and afro gisn,raten several etinica. Tfsst f;e,ntral Paninnulee f4untal Health Center providetes annintance for :nantal health prahlemss for the entira Central Peninsula nreo. All worst i!s tin nn outpntient hasis and ineluda:s ungesinea and group therapy. flrsLinnt,; rusluirinel tint;pitalization are referred tea the. Alsj-,Ka P:syrhinl.rie: InvsLilute in Anchoraflex or other inpntis�nl, racilitieses outsietes that community. Emorejetncy oorvicus orn s,va i l nhin Zvi hours n e1-jy, swain days .a ws•ok. RECit1: A 111)N The. Central Ken-ji P+tninzula -jrsts i:s by far the mout popular outdnnr rstc;et-ltion arsto In the atatir, trio Ketnni 1.3ke and River conote%, ctiomach %ntionnl fare:.;t, Kenai :sstionsl '4o.s.eT Range, } Captain Cook State Pnrk and n number of state -maintained rocreation factlitinu and privrstely-owssssd fnellitien in the area offor both local rooldonto end visitors the widest possible reng`e of nutdour activities. Tho invaluable local recreation resources have bean a major factor in nttracting now rosidents in the Konai-Soldotna area. Kenai has embarked on ambitious recreation facility investment programs donignerd to provide the widest poosiblo ronge of rocreation:sl choices for community residents. The City of Kenai has a woll-organized and active Parks and Recreation Department, with a full-time director and a staff of employees. The department, with an operating budget of about $190,000 from gonara- funds, administers a variety of programs. Tho City of Konni maintains eight outdoor recreation arose. One of Kennita most popular facilities is the new community recreation center. Built in 1981 with a state grant, the center incorporatoo racquetball courts, ohowera, saunas, hot tub, small exoreiao room and a teen center. A 1903 addition to the building will contain basketball courts, a gyrnnostice area and another racquetball court. There are 19 adult basketball teems that play s 90-game schedule in Kenai. In 1902 there were between 800 and 900 adults and children who participated in b000ball, aortball, little league and other ball gn:lon. Seven ball fioldo were maintained almost orY a daily basis for theno players by the Parks and Recreation Dopartmen"t of the City. The Peninqula Oilers, a non-professional banoball toom eginprised of coltstgo sstudenta, play garnoa on their own Oilers Field. The emnpntition includors other nun -professional teams from throughout Alauka. A oummor recreation program hold ench nummor is nupervlsed by the Rnernntinn Wipssrtment of the city, Miss past nssmrner there were over 175 children enrolled in Lila prnyrsrm. Thin ARCO Joiofsu O'wosnis Lumen are opantserttd by List? Ilacro:stion Vapartmnnt and ARCO oil Comnaosy and nupervined for tho ontire P.sniusetn. Sane er thn park arnrsu ern floodsid during tltn winter providing nPatinol risk's thrglhihAUt Llses c-immllnity. Atnng with these there scot sstssl Ott is rac i l i t its:s at art I thu local nchuat:s. 116itdear rttrrotsstinn of sill typed is ay.•tilahte throughout the Polls in-sul I. lhoisn Who enjoy fi.shinq, bulk river and lake fishing, thane ttnjoy huntinsl can finl1 it atfotl1161s h.:re. Reer,!-Itian of att kindn i3 1V1i11'slt! in Kenai!! .n r The Chucliclh National Forncst and the Kenai Notional Moona Range offur a wide vnrlety of outdoor reeroation experioneoo. The Hoasso Rantp? won eatalsl ialsoa in 1941 to protect the habitat of moo -so and other wildlife. Short hunting and fishing is allowed In the range in accordance with Alnuka Department of Fiah and Cane rogulation3. The U.S. Finh and Wildlife Service maintains compclroundo, picnic :siton, cabins and hiking trailrs within the ranee. Scvural local commercial float plane operators maintain cabins on the more remote lakno for fly -in fishing and hunting trips. Along the Sterling Highway in the Chugach National Foroat the U.S. Forest Servvee maintains recreational areas at Quartz Creek, Cooper Crook and Russian River. The State of Alaska also manngea a number of recreational facilities in the Kenai area. The Captain Cook State Park has a variety of facilitios, including boat launches and campsites. Other State campsites and picnic areas are located at Bernice Lake, Kasilof, Johnson and Tuatumena Lekee'and Clam Gulch. The State plans to develop additional recreation areas at the mouth of the Kesilof River and at Kalifonsky Beach in the future, a _ i( '.l J EXHIBIT D CITY OF KENAI "W Goa l 4 41"ia" P. o, BOX 660 KENA1, ALAINA 99611 TELEPHONE 763 - 7636 June 10, 1983 MEMORANDUM TOs William J. Brighton, City Manager FROMs Charles A. Brown, Finance Director Lae SUBJECTS Financing of Building for Flight Service You have asked me to identify possible sources of financing for a building to be leaood to FAA. My understanding is that the proposed project would proceed within the following estimated time -frames Approximate Date City makes application (proposal) to FAA 12-26-82 FAA selects cite 11-01-83 City completes building 11-01-05 If thin time frame in reosionables, than we would have approximately 2 years to construct the building (two construction seasons). Without regard to what might be the moot desirable method or financing, the following nppesir to ho the options avnilribles 1. $1,54n,072 fo available in the Cenoral Fund Reserve for Capital Improvementa. 2. $2,626,579 if; available in the General fund tlnnpproprisited fund Patance. 3. A review of the city caries, and our experience with the Aloakn 14tonscipril hand flank in innuinq debt for the City Hall nulldinq, indicateta that the City could conduct a special election within 3n day•.i from [het time Council r11vcs: approval for Itin election. A rouqh time -frame fellows: Day # r Act ion 011111. )) Reuulution for ouhminsion to ' votera 1 Election 30 Ordinance for iusuancs of G.O. bonda 110 Solo of bonds 120 It appears, then, that if the City of Konsi ware selected as the eito on November 1, 1903, we could have the money about March 19 1904 by a onlo of C.O. bonds, utilizing the Bond Bank. CAB/dg I i f , carmen vincent gintol3, g3rchitect Kenai, 4625 lasica professional building suite '170 i 907 283.7732 SPACE for AUTOMATED FLIGHT SERVICE STATION FACILITY (AFSS) KENAI, ALASKA for DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Proposed by The City of Kenai, Alaska January 17, 1983 J i i tw - I 0 ARCHITECTURAL and ENERGY CONSIDERATIONS The proposed structure is one story and has been designed in accordance with the layout and specifications as presented in the Solicitation for Offers, dated October 27th, 1982. The structure, designed in accordance with the 1982 edition of the Uniform Building Code and local codes and ordinances, will be an energy efficient one, which exceeds the .o6 min- imum composite "U" factor requested. The exterior walls will be wood frame construction (Type V-1 hour), constructed of 2401s with 9J inches of glass fiber baits (R-30). The roof, constructed of standard "Fink" trusses will contain 12" of glass fiber batts (R-38), vented per code. All windows will be triple -glazed, clad wood windows. The exterior w111 be finished with preformed-prefinished metal panels, of colors to be sel- ected by the Lessee. The building contains 10,148 square feet of interior space. Though the plan is as presented in the Solicitation, the interior layout will be designed to suit the Lessee. We feet some changes may be appropriate, for example, it , would appear that moving the Break Room to an exterior wall will enhance em- ployee comfort by permitting that space to have windows. Since the Operations Room is without windows, the ability to see outside while having lunch or be- ing on break will be emotionally and psychologically beneficial. All interior finishes including hardware will be in accordance with the stand- ards set forth in the -Solicitation. The structure will be designed to facilitate physically handicapped people in �1 accordance with G.S.A. Accessability Standard, dated October 14th, 1980. STRUCTURAL The exterior walls and center dividing wall will be load bearing wood. The foundation system will be monolithically poured concrete, insulated on the ex- terior. The entire building will have, a concrete floor, recessed at the Opera- tions half of the building to receive an "access floor system", with a loading capacity of 250 psf. The finishod floor level of the access floor will be at the same elevation of adjacent floor. Interior partitions will be of three varieties: 1).The conventional gypsum board over wood studs for fixed use spaces. 2).Oemountable partition systems will be used as required where infrequent relocation of the wall is required. 3).A relocatabie partition will allow the Training Room to be divided. ACOUSTICAL TREATMVIT Acoustical treatment will be used as required by the Lessee and as delineated In the Solicitation. �.J J SITE PLAN r The Site Plan presented is located on the site marked "Location No. 111. There is space for future expansion and for parking spaces in addition to the 90 spaces provided. Should the Lessee decide on another site, the Site Plan can be adapted and oriented accordingly. lECHM1ICAL Plumbing: f ' Plumbing system will be standard commercial fixtures with flush valves on the ' ' water closets and single lever faucets on the lavatories. Water supply will be from the City water system and domestic hot water will be from a as -fired _. H14 heater. Sanitary waste will be to the City sewer system. Roof drains will, be to dry wells located outside the building. r Heating: A gas -fired boiler will supply heating water to baseboard convectors in the r5 exterior rooms. Self contained heating valves will be on each convector for " individual room control. Boiler temperature will be reset for economy. Cabinet unit heaters will be used at entrances. Equipment Room Cooling: A self contained, down flow cooling and humidifying unit will be located in the Equipment Room, discharging air under the raised floor. Heat will be re- moved by a glycol coil and discharged to the fresh air intake of the ventila- ting unit when it can be,used. Ventilation: ' A roof mounted variable volume air handler will be used to supply ventilation air to all spaces. Roomy with similar exposure will share a VAV terminal box and thermostat. Air supplied will be for ventilation only. Bach type filters will be used for dirt removal and the heat necessary will come from the hoat- t... ing boiler and from the heat rejected from the Equipment Room. Cooling will F be outside air. Equipment will be sized for future expansion. Special Considerations: ' Roof u:nunted air handler will be on a sound and vibration isolating curb. High f----=-. velocity air distribution ducts will have sound isolating silencers as required. ;.4... Equipment Room will be separated from the rest of the construction for mainten- ance of high humidity. Air supply and exhaust from tho Equipment Room will be controlled to maintain a positive pressure with respect to the rest of the build- ing. i • ELEC_._TR l�'tiL Electrical Scope: The electrical service will be 3-phase, 4-wire, 120/208V rated to carry the overall load demand for the proposed building and including a budget for fu- ture expansion. The design will include a complete design for lighting, power distribution and fire alarm. The design will conform to the latest edition of the National Elec- trical Code (NEC), the Life Safety Code, National Electrical Safety Code and Handicapped Codes. Equipment will meet NEMA, ILEA and IEEE standards. Stand -By Electrical Generation: . Space will be provided in the existing Emergency Generator facility at the Air- port for an emergency generator. The generator shall be provided by the Lessee. The space designated for emergency power in the AFSS facility will be used for mechanical and electrical equipment, and storage. Electrical Grounding: Special attention to a substantial ground grid will assure a suitable ground plane for both safety grounding for the facility, and for a communications ground. Raceways: Separate raceway systems are proposed for power distribution, telephone commun- ications and data communications systems. Electrical Service: A pad mounted transformer located adjacent to the facility will be the source for com:rercial power at the site. The service will be sized to allow for requir- ed facility expansion. Fault current will be limited by cable limiters and/or current limiting fuses at the main service disconnect. Electrical Distribution'System: The electrical distribution system will be designed to separate electronic equip - wont and separate panels to optiatize system security. Separate panels will serve the mechanical and lighting systems. The voltage will be 120/208V and loads bal- anced. Lightning Protection System: A cc,,, -plate lightning protection system will be provided and will comply with the specification: of Underwriter's Lab (UL 96A) and the National Fire Protection Association (i:FPA No.18). i A ^� f r f p ELECTRlCAL(cont'd) F Lighting: f Exterior lighting will be high pressure sodium for optimum energy efficiency and operation at cold temperatures. Exterior lighting will be photocell and timeclock controlled. Interior lighting will be flourescent throughout, with RFI suppressors on each fixture. Diffusers will be selected to minimize glare on work surfaces and on VOT screens. Lighting levels will comply with Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) recon-mendations. Battery operated emergency lighting will be provided in the Operations Room and all exit corridors. Fire Alarm: A supervised, non -coded, multi zone alarm system will provide life safety for the building occupants and early warning protection for the facility. Smoke detectors of the ionization type will be provided throughout the facility. Alarm horns will be of the Audible/Visual tvoe. An exterior alarm bell will be provided and the building sorinkler system monitored. GENERAL NOTE It is the intention of the Proposer that the Architectural, Structural, Mechani- cal and Electrical components pf the structure meet or exceed the standards set forth in the Solicitation for Offers. i. . 13 . f m ili . . EXHIBIT E carman Vincent gintoli, architect AMENDMENTS box 4625 professional building suite 110 kenal,alaska 99611 907 283.7 732 FAA/AFSS ;} ENERGY CONSERVATIM CONSIDERATIONS Architectural: The building will be constructed using 10" thick walls, with 9101 , glass fiber batts. This insulation will have an "R" value of 30. All windows will be triple glazed with a u-value of .03 . Insulation: Walls: 91" lass fiber batts R-30 Roof: 16" glass fiber batts R-50 Floor: Perimeter insulation underslab and 24" bblow grade. 2" extruded polystyrene. ' Windows: Triple glazed u. .03. 141"VIS to hhave Intlegral fip. to reduce infiltration. Infiltration rate to be .25 cfm/linea e t crac . All exterior doors and frame will be insulated. Door frames a"nd thresholds will be of the thermal -break. design. Doors will be weathor stripped to minimize in- filtration. All exterior entrances will be ddsigned with "Arctic Foyers". Sola_ r T2maerin : Fenestration will be maximized on the south side of the building where possible, to maximize solar gain during the heating season. Overhangs will be designed, however. to shade the sun from May to September, to minimize tooting loads whit( admitting the sun from October thru April. i As the building is sited, the spaces not requiring windows e.g. operations are situated on the horth side of the building, thus eliminating infiltration north ' winter winds. Electrical: Exterior _Lj,,,htin : High pressure sodium, photo cell and timeclock controlled. Interior _L 1chtina: Florescent lighting to be equipped with energy conserving lamps and ballasts. n I I a � Mechanical: PLUMBI11G 1 Plumbing system will be standard commercial fixtures with flush valves on the water closets and single lever faucets on the lavatories. Water supply will be from the city water system and domestic hot water will be from a gas fired HW heater.Sanitary waste will be to the city sewer system.Roof drains will be to dry wells located outside the building. HEATING A gas fired boiler will supply heating water to baseboard convectors in the exterior rooms.Self contained heating valves will be on each convector for individual room control.Boiler temperature will be reset for economy.Cabinet unit heaters will be used at entrances. , EQUIPMENT R0014 COOLING A self contained down flow* cooling and humidifying unit will be located in the equipment room discharging air under the raised floor.11eat will be removed by a glycol coil and discharged to the r, fresh air intake of the ventilating unit when it can be used. VENTILATION A remote mounted variable volume air (VAV) handler will be used to supply ventilation air to all spaces:Rooms with similar expo- sure will share a VAV terminal box and thermostat,Air supplied will be for ventilation only.Bag type f iltors will be used for dirt removal and the heat nocconary will coma from the heat rejected from the equipment room.Cooling will be by a DX coil in the VAV unit with an air cooled condenser, SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS High velocity air distribution ducts will have sound isolating silencers as roquirod.EquiLnaont room will be separated from the cent of the construction for maintenance of high humidity.Air supply and exhaust from the equipment room will be controlled to maintain a positive pressure with respect to the rest of the building.Standard air economizer cycle on VAV unit will determine by an enthalphy controller when outside air can be used for cooling without running the refrigeration unit. S10TE: Total "U" value of the building envelope will be LESS than the total "U" by the S.F.O.. and the .05 required by the State of Alaska. Unit Cost Adjustments par Pare rtuhs 138 b 139 4i Paragraph 138 + .A Ceiling high office subdividing partitions Floor mountod duplex electrical outlet Wail mounted duplex electrical outlet Floor mounted telephone outlet Wall mounted telephone outlet Paragraph 139 I' Sound conditioned office subdividing partitions tI. Fo 1 I i k, c :. i �4rf $60 L/F $125 ea. $100 ea. $60 ea. $60 ea. $70 L/F I J M . i E%HIBIr F Kasai Gh ooloer of t;onnnrrve Hot 497 Komi. Almr -ku 99611 SC CITY OF KENAI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESOLUTION NO. 63-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE'CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, IN SUPPORT OF THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL'S EFFORTS TO ACQUIRE A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AUTOMATED FLIGHT SERVICE STATION (FAA-AFSS) FOR THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA. WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce is convinced the location of an AFSS facility in the City of Kenai will provide a positive economic impact on the City and surrounding areas, and WHEREAS, the location of said facility in Kenai will substantially enhance the attractiveness of the Kenai Municipal Airport to the flying public, and WHEREAS' the Chamber of Commerce is endeavoring to lend its weight end influence to the growth and job stability of the City of Konsi, and WHEREAS, Kenai hoe the ability to provide the employees of the FAA an excellent life al•yle and excellent schools for their children, and WHEREAS, Kenai is the moot centralized location for the facility, hoe more than adequate residential and retail amenities to service the FAA personnel and hre ample F,ccena to the more populous areas of oouth central Alaska by air so wall so by hlgl,rrnyri. Now, TlicftcrORE, OE It RESOLVED BY T11C CIIA140rit Of COMMCRa of 111E CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thaL the Chnmbor of Commerce horuby urged the Fodural Aviation Administration of the United States to aoinct the city of Kenai as thn alto of the Automntod Flight Survico St:ntion for south central Alaska. A001110 by the City of Keinni Chamber of Cenunetreo this 14th day of January, 1945. 01 . 1.Urlt! Ike i 1 11/!i, i're>3lddllt AIIE ST r I L 6 Date :..... . , . Vote,: Action: KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH RESOLUTION 82-217 ticv. 16, 102 Unanimous Adopted 0 URGING THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH THE CO`:SOLIDATED FLIGHT SERVICE STATION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL ALASKA IN THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH. WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Assembly of the Kenai Peninsula Borough that the Federal Aviation Adminis- tration is in the process of consolidating their Flight Service stations so that only one station will be used to service the entire south central area of Alaska; and WHEREAS, the area to be served would cover Kodiak Island, the Alaska Peninsula, and the Island Chain, as well as the southern portion of the state, it is apparent that the Kenai Peninsula would present a central location from which such service could be proficiently rendered; and WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula has road access from Anchorage and the central portions of the state and ample flight service connections with Anchorage; and WHEP.EAS, the Kenai Peninsula has more than adequate residential and living facilities as well as retail outlets to serve and accommodate the personnel and their families r7 would be located in or near the location of such consolidatt.d. Flight Service Station; and WHERE?.S, various areas in the Kenai Peninsula are condu- cive to the establishment to a goofs radio communication network in addition to being centralized in.the area; N0W THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH: Section 1. That the Assembly of tho Kenai Peninsula Borough hereby urges the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States to select the Kenai Peninsula for the location of the consolidated Flight Service Station for South Central Alaska because it is the most centralized location for the facility, has more than adequate residential and retail poten- tial service of the porsonnel necessarily situated in the area for such Flight Service Station, has areas of excellent potcn- tial for facilities: for radio communication, and has ample access to the more populous portions of South Central Alaska by air and read an wall as having more than adequate telephonic co:=unication with such areas. Section 2. That the Clerk is hereby directed to furnish copies ot t s resolution to officials of the United Sta,*-s Kenai Peninsula Scrough Resolution 82-217 Page 1 of 2 Pages Y J radaral Aviation Administration and to any other parties having an intoront thorain. F i` F : E k� 1 ' i 1 I� I 1 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI PENINSULA Bon6u E1 ON THIS 1Gth BAY OF November � 1982. 9,.533 n�a�Clou , mo ant I ATTEST: I Hor�Clar c i Kenai Peninsula Eo:cugh Resolution 82-217 Page 2 of 2 Pages XHIBI T C F � The City will commit $1,500,000 to the project of gonatructing s flight service atation in the City of Kenai for t o purpose of consolidating the FAA's flight service stations i south central Alaska. This facility will be built according t the FAA's specifications and will be loaned to the FAA fo $1.00 per year for a period of 20+ years. Should the coat of onatructing said facility exceed $1,500,000 the excess shall be pro -rated on a monthly basis over 20 years and shell be the determining factor In establishing the. lease rate for said facility. Under no circumstances will the FAA be responsible for more than $500,000 over the 20 year period. _! a r ' r f �T Glacier Siatei Wephlane Company � Nlnn/�. pl �pnl.nnn411 IOW.Pm Int /Ou1�1�;1 I441M.O A11100 WAN . Iws'Ises 11t1 r) 9 Juno, 1983 EXHIBIT H tic. James Swallay Airport Manager City of Kenai P.O. Sox $80 Kenai. Alaska 99611 Dear tiro Swatleyl i Par your request for a definite time required for Glacier State Telephone Company to provide 32-2 wire and 47-4 wire circuits at the proposed flight service station •t the Kenai Airport, please be advised that Glocior State Telephone Company can provide the required circuits one year after officiai'notification from you of definite location whore theaa facilities are to be located. This timo period does not include requirements that must be done by Alaocom or any ! other company that may be involved. Also, we would require a suitable equipment room provided at the terminating location site. Approximate room size required is 10'x10'. Dataiia of this room can be diocunaed with your engineer oV yourself when final location has been decided. It you have further questions regarding this, ploosse feet free to call me at your convenience. Sincoroly, j GLACIER STsW11, TELEPHONE. COMPANY NSTW17. tli::;1G:t ` torinnn loch District t:ngincer cc $ K. Juhn,ion G. lsurnhardt J. Adams 0. Robinson !sill Brighton •'°7lwi�lDZl�p�#�•�fA,wm^�.,�7�rn�►fr�a,..✓,,.�,r1,��...,1►w,.s�/••�!.� �w�rwesNr�.�r,Msnn!.��.1+�+w7w•ws�wr/�a�>rwn�+r�.�*r.•A+►rw•,� Mf er.�.1f•r.r�rr+..Mr.w•.MrMr Wrrw•wrw.•. rr...u........ ..... • w.� .•�..... •r. �, .....►.: •.. •.., r.i .• . •,� ..n•.r� .. . • • .. . 1 i i I .-. .ems � Fes_ _-�- _ � -. _ _ ,. .. •_ I r MEMO r TAt Tim Rogero, City Attorney FRBMs Mnry Ann tiara REt SS 67, Utility Relocates . OATEs 4/4/04 1 $A 67 failed today. The following won the votes ` . Voted Nos Rep. Ahood, Rep, Adamo, Rope ®u000ll, Rep. Cato, Rep. Davie, Rep, Ouncon, Rep, Flood, Rope Fritz, Rep. Fuller, Rep, Coll, Rep, Cruaeendorf, Rep. Herrmann, Rep, Koponon, Rep, Lacher, ° Rep. Laroon, Rep, Lindouor, Rep, Liaka, Rep. Molono, Rep. McBride, Rep, M.M. Miller (auneau), Rope Pootinger, Rep, Phillipo, Rep, Szymonoki, Rep, Uohling, Rap, Vacka, Rep, Ward, Rep. Wendte Voted Voss Rep, Borneo, Rep. Rettloworth, Rep, Clockoin, Rep. Furnace, Rep. Hayoo, Rep. Hurlhert, Rep, Martin, Rep. Miller, ` Rep. Ringota�v Rep, Tischer, Rep, Zharoff Aboont s Rope Cowdery j Excuoods Rope Shultz The girl at Legioiative information acid that rumor had it it t failed hocouoe Municipal League woo net in favor of it, b F I - Ir r� Im -aska 111111C1�� oeague a Vay, suite 301 °1 aka 99801 ; 6.132500 LEgistATIVE BUHEAN March 30, 1984 -X... ITHit�'S OF INTEREST '`;1/84119�i 14 035 HB 172 - Title, 29s The CRA Committee Oubstituto passed out of House Judiciary with individual recommendations Thursday, with no amendments, no testimony taken, and no eommentat Many thanks to the Title 29 Took Force who made their presence known. Also several more communities have sent resolutions to their' Legislators. The next committee referral is House Finance and will probably be heard the week of April 9th. Contact Howse Finance Committee membera and urao them to ones COMB 212 (CPA) out quickly ViLb no,s=dments. House Finances Adams, Bottiaworth, Huribert, Furnace, 0ruseendorf, Martin, Ward, Fritz, Undsuer, Duncan, and Zharoff. It you do not have good contacts with these individuals, look at Rules or any Representative or Senator. )ksnieieai Agistance and Revenue 8hsrLn&s Thank you to those who have contacted their Legislators requesting full funding and to the communities who have net resolutions. Budgets for revenue and CRA have been closed out in House Finance with the 0overnor0a recommended (short) level. Both the House and the Senate have added $1.6 million to the Senior Citizens Property WRonters Rebate Program, bowevor, Senator Faike bas proposed adding $2.4 million in revenue sharing in Senate Finance. Speaker Hayes is not optimistic of full funding but eayo it depends on the capital bills and the updated revenue figures. The Legislators are hearing your capital projects pleas, but no full funding for municipal assistance and revenue shoring. Sevens Sharing Final Paymeness Because of appeals allowing late filings, and staff changes, DCRA, as you know, has not disbursed final payments. However, DCRA is planning to issue 90% provisional payments around the end of next week or the beginning of the week after to those communities who have aubmitted their FY 83 audits. 8B 67 ;,tftilit; Relocations Without a warning, the Labor and Coameree committeN oubstituto was board in House Rules and slightly amended (no help) Wednesday and hit the floor ThursdayH Because of threats of additional veto cuts by the Governor if the House did not addreeo Ouaitna and the major projects fund, floor action on the bill wan delayed until Friday. HEARINGS Senate Rasourees, 4/2/84 - HB 347 • Land Disposal Refuse. House Transportation, 4/3/84 - COBB 313 (Fin) am - Road Maintenance Service Areas. House Pinance, 4/5/84 - HB 169 - Local Service Traile end Roads Appropriations, I rdf Legislative Bulletin 035 - page 2 FLOOR ACTION 88 78 - PEMjBchool Distrietss The Senate amended CSSB 78 (HRSS) on the floor and it passed 15.4. g8 3� d Maintenance Service Ar_ass CSSB 315 (Pin) am passed the Senate March 27, 17-1 and has been referred to the House Transportation and Finance Committees. C0111 589 (Pin) am - A Passed the House, 22-17. Furnace reconsidered. HS 684 - APA Appropriations Passed the House 3/29, 37-2. Furnace reconsidered. IN COMMITTER BB 228 - State Aid for Indian Tribess Senate Finance recommended the CRA CS and an amendment changing the 1983 to 1984. The bill will dilute the amount of money in the municipal assistance fund to be shared per capita, as the results of increasing the base amount shared. The bill was referred to Rules. SS 529 - Mobile Hoke Relocation Grants or Loonet The Senate State Affairs Committee offered a substitute Friday and the bill was referred to Finance. The bill, introduced on 3/23/84 by Senate CRA, would make available loans or grants of 82,SO4 to each owner and primary resident if forced to relocate. The Commissioner may contract with a municipality or non profit corporation for implementation. 09 ,L66 - Fire Protection on State_Lands The CS removing the reference to municipalities passed out the Senate Resources on Monday with a unanimous "do pas911. Referred to CRA. HB 396 - Reosyment of State I!Mitalss CSIM 396 passed Finance and was referred to Rules. It is similar to HS 477 which failed the House 3/24/84, except that the amount returned is just the amount received, i.e. no equity or interest, and the collected amount is earmarked for other health care services and facilities. HS 558 - LSR62 (Allocation Districts and Fotmuiss CS for HS 558 passed House Transportation Wednesday with seven "do pass" and- two "no recommendations". Referred :o CRA. In addition to designating districts according to DOT and developing a formula based on road miles, population, end area/population of hone rule cities in a borough, the CS determines local service roads as less then 400 ADT. HS 609 - State Bond Committees Finance board the CM 609 (Loans) and offered another CS (Fin) Thursday. The committee substitute states that the bond committee shall develop written policies for debt statistics and instrumentalities of the state authorized to !issue tax exempt obligations, e.g. AHFC; information guidelines only for municipalities remain in the bill. HB 625 - Asriculture Land Property Tax- Exemptions The CS (CRA) passed out of committee with one 1140 pass", one "do not pass", and two "no recommendations". The committee substitute increases the penalties (it over prime) for converting to incompatible use, allows a waiver for good cause for filing late, and requires recording a lien for the reimbursement. HJR 61 - Cities! Governed as Districts House CRA reported out with 3 "do pass" recommendations and one ►#do not pass". Sent to House Judiciary. NEW BILLS SB $27 - Senior Citizen Tax Yxenrotions Besides correcting problems which exist in current low, this bill allows for an equitable prorating of payments in the event underfunding occurs in the programs presently administered. Current law requires payments on a first -come, first -served basis which results in unequal payments to both municipalities and individuals. Referred to State Affairs and Finance. ,7-0 PD — 40 ve I ;��fimoowr__ A'-p< 0 -,&-,& AA&WO ., r _ AAAo2odded Awl" PJOV %0 J_ LiF dw -- " f, _ �.�. I