Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984-07-18 Council Packet
Kenai City Council Meeting Packet July 18, 1984 w i' AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING DULY 18, 1984 - 7tOO PM WORK SESSION - 600 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda 'All items listed with an asterisk (•) are considered to be routine and non-controveralal by the Council and will be Approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda no part of the General Orders. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1. Ron Yamamoto - Doyle's Lot - Gusty S/0 C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 949-84 - Amending Zoning Map - Silvertip S/D 2. Ordinance 950-84 - Amending Zoning Map - Park View S/D • •��-- u 3. Ordinance y1 -8T44 Amending Zoning Map - Sprucewood n ji Glen S/D l uvwvr 4. Ordinance 952-84 - Age ding Zoning Map - �-Y�YY� Walkowski-Deland S/0 P 5. Resolution 84-71 - Awarding Contract - Walker lane Extension - Zuback - $86,828.84 (Reconsideration) Resolution 84-76 Transfer s. - of Fundy - Walker Lane Extension - $653 (Reconsideration)_( 6. Resolution 84-78 - Awarding Lease - Autoga is Teller Machine at Airport - Peninsula Savings & Loan - C� / $1,200 yr. 7. Resolution 84-79 - Awarding Lease - But Concession at Airport - Sandra Daniels - $4,100 no. S. Resolution 84-80 - City Support to Borough Septage/Solid Waste Codisposal Incinerator Project if Certain Stipulations are Adhered to 9. Resolution 84-81 - Requesting Municipal Assistance Funding from State 10. Resolution 84-82 - Directing Enforcement of Non -Conforming Land Use - Land fill 7 Resolution 84-83 - Sprucewood Glen S/D a. Manager's Report b. Preliminary Assessment Roll 12. Res. 84-84 - Awarding Contract - Engineering - S. Highbush, Buwbl:beet-.E. Allsk, Swires, Mighbueh Rds. - 1aes►i-ir+a. ` :c. xc. _ 13. Res. 84-85 - Transfer of Funds - Painting Striping - Airport Parking Lots & Driveways - $1,850 14. *Application for Transfer of Liquor License - Larry's Club �a 1 1 1 A I ( I 1 1 DMINUTES 1. /&/Regular Meating, July 5, 1984 E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. •Soldotne Cab - Support of Ordinance 914-84 Amendments / 2. 'DEC - Pollution Control Technology - Tesoro Petroleum 3. *City of Soldotns Airport Managor - Objection to Peninculs Communieationa Tower F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. *Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified i 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. *Ordinance 954-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Setting Zoning Amendment Fees 4. *Ordinance 955-04 - Amending Sign Code, Portable and Flashing Signs 5. Ordinance 956-84 - Funding Community Center Design Proposal - C. Gintoll 6. Ordinance 997-04 - In re Rsv/Appns - Council on Aging (Community Service Program) - f3,269 a. Public Hearing 7. Ordinance 958-04 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Council on Aging - $97,$94 s. Public Hearing 8. Discussion - Lease Application - Doyle - Gusty S/D .'. - .,:�..,.-.=..•.. ,...�.,r 9. Discussion - Water h Sewer on Princees, Aiisk, Magic, McCollum, Cinderella, Fox y� 10. Discussion - Duat Control -- A4sc- may. M 11, H REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor . 4. City Clerk S. Finance Director 6. Planning 6 Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT ' S � •_e,1� � �. y-v vim. , 1c" Q ' 1 I� �t a . b I E 3 f ' J 'L, Damon 0 ,��I�.'���i�� ail':, ���9���� MORMON mommo MA ii��iio� Rawl Emig NOOSE �WYEM■NOI IMMEMINMENEENNIMIN mommommommoomm f - .-.. Syr . - ^ --- _. -- , - - � .._ „ � . �,r.:�.-.�,.•... . i a' -- JULY 189 1984 INFORMATION ITEMS 1 - Memo, Atty. Rogers to ABC - Applications for Dispensary Liquor Licenses 2 - Library Report - June 3 - "No Smoking" Statute 4 - Billing - TAMS - Small Boat Harbor - $59190 5 - Billing - M. Touriainen - Haller, Evergreen - $11,424.63 6 - Billing - C. Gintoli - Senior Center - $643 7 - Billing - Winos, Corthell, Bryson -Thompson Pork-537,427.30 - 8 - Pay Estimato - Prosser Const. - lot & 2nd Sts. - $84,891.96 9 - Transfers of Funds Under $1,000 10 - Pay Estimate - Construction Unlimited - Thompson Park - $104,110.02 . y I � 4 h-•..-�...-.�'Jr = lAl.a� a UIIJ.—+.�,._`H_/�,L ,. J:L,,�!t. -,,. � ., ... .. - <-... ,.. t .. .T. .. .. ,. .F� _--..=.-ter .,..wKrF; zs-�_ .. 0-1 CITY OF KENAI P.O. BOX 6110 • KENAI, ALASKA • 'NONE 40s•7666 To: Mayor Tom Wagoner FRom, Dana Gerotlauer, Administrative Assistant nAU /.1A.A4 woragwi A l!..nty of During the past approximately s years, since I was employed by the City of Kenai as Administrative Assistant, I have been contacted several times by Mr.'Ron Yamamoto regarding the status of his lease application on Lot 4, Gusty bubdivision. His inquiries were gencrally.ragarding status of release t rom the FAA, status or rozoning, etc. After the time of Jetf Labahn's I employment as Land Manager-sn February of.I983, Mr. Yamamoto's inquiries were directed to,Jeff, ip n + !91 ftGNE� DATL A { f f f l• I �.w-0,W ,;1.,t-, .-.. :o i.,.,la �' -, .. J� '�Z'..L'.'�i� wA R`?1.`+�" %r=� .nY,', f .1�,b'�n�ic r .,N, q�; •..i,, l i "_ RONALO 9.CUMMIN64 b19IN9N 01 R0UTY1 {ARAM T. NALLANTYNC OAVIO O.CLARN JONN W./1VtRT4LN, in. CUMMIM & ROUTM A PRO//ORIONA. CONDONATION ATTORNM AT LAW 142 6A41 NOW)# AV9NU19,bU1TR 001 AOCNo0A61, 41.AIVA 99001 A L69 PMRiLN of, CouaKL AREA oOi/�9b•Ibbb July 2, 1984 ,Lgglf31.1 i s Mr. Jeff Lubahn Land Manager c; v City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo' Kenai, Alfauka 9Y611 Res Lut 4, Custy Sut,diviaiun, Addition 110. 1 Our File No. 151-4 Dear Mr., Labahn1 Enclosed ploase find the Concept Lome Application returned to Mr. Yamamoto in your letter dated April 9, 1984. Also plosau find enclosed a chock for $10.00, the difference between the $10,00 filing foe filed by tor. Yamamoto in 1970 when the Concept Lease was filed and the 020.00 required by the City of Kenai pursuant to the terms of the Kenai Municipal Code. Payment of the $10.00 by Mr. Yamamoto is not to be eonaidored a waiver of any of Mr. Yuma,noto's rights or an ad -mission by Mr. Yamamoto that the Concept Lease was improperly filed pursuant to the then, or now, existing requirements of the Kenai Municipal Code. Rather, Mr. Yamamoto does not consider the issue of whether or not he should pay 420.00 to be d major bone of contention with the City, but would rather move on to the more serious issues. it seems to be quite nonsensical to ask sotaoone to pay an additional filing fee for documents previously filed with tho then current filing feu paid. For example, the State Recording Office does not require all individualu who filed documents to pay additional feea in the event of an increase in filing rates. Also find enclosed Mr. Yamamoto's chock in the amount of $500.00. Mr. Yamamoto, by paying the City 0500.00, is not acknowledging that the City's procedure on April 9, 1904, was proper or correct to tho extant it couatituted a rejection of his lease. Rather, it is Mr. Yamamoto's contention that thu proper procedure the City should have fullowed when considering Mr. Yamamoto's lease was to precisely identify to Mr. Yamamoto low anu why his filing was doficiont, if at all, and to give Mr. Yamamoto a reason6ble period of time to cure the deficiency, if any, rather then rojacting hiss lease arbitrarily. It is Mr. Yamamoto's understanding that the lease application for Deyla will be conaiderdd at the July 5, 1954 meeting of the City Council of Kauai., Mr. Yamamoto has very serious reservations to . 'I Page 2 Mr. Jeff Labahn July 2, 1984 concerning the appropriateness of conaidoring Doyle's application without the City having been given his Concept Lease application the requirud due procaaa conaideration sa out forth in the applicable City of Kenai Municipal Code. Specifically, KMC 21.10.060(a) states. . . Thu Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission ahali normally conaider applicationa for specific lands on a first come, first serve basis if the Commission finds that the application is eomploto and the use proposed in the application is the highest and best use and conforms to the Airport Master Plan and other goals out by the Commission or City Council. Where there is difficulty in obtaining a perfected application, details as to development plans, etc., or where the applicant fails to comply with direetiona or requests of the Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission, any such priority will be lost. It is my understanding that Mr. Yamamoto's application was forwarded to the Advisory Planning and 'Zoning Commission, that they approved the Concept Lease application, and the scatter was forwarded to the City Council. See attached Exhibit A. Your Letter dated April 9, 2904 rejecting Mr. Yamamoto's Concept Lease in its entirety specifically deprived Mr. Yamamoto of the due process required not only by the Kenai Municipal Code, but also by the state and federal constitutions and failed to take into account the status of Mr. Yamamoto's lease application by the City. Further, KMC 21.10.000(c) specifically statues Conceptual Applications relative to unplatted land or unreleased lands will also be considered on a first come, first serve basis under the some conditions set forth above. An approval of concept by the Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, the applicant is assured the right of first refusal of the lease following termination of leaso rate in accordance wits established policy. . . The City has completely dropped the bail on Mr. Ydscanoto's l Concept Lease. Not only was the City under a specific duty to - ; forward the application to the Advisory Planning and Zoning sr Page 3 Mr. Jeff Labahn July 2, 1984 Commission, but the Advisory Planning and zoning Commission was under a specific duty to consider all Concept Lease applications on file with the Laity of Kenai. Mr. Yamamoto has had the Concept Lease filed with the City of Kenai for six years, and the City of Kenai is now conaidering an applicant for the exact same parcel of property that has had a loaae application on file for loss than six months. Your admonition that there is some relationship between Mr. famansoto's current dispute with the City of Kenai concerning the lease payments on Lot 3 and the issues revolving around Lot 4, Gusty Subdivision, Addition No. 1 is totally unsupported in law or by any rule, regulation, statute or ordinance in the Stato of Alaska. Mr. Yamamoto asks nothing more than that the City abide by the regulations and ordinances adopted and that he be given his required due process of law pursuant to the ordinances adopted and tsie Constitution of State of Alaska and the united States. Mr. Yamamoto is adamant that the City reverse the position as outlined in your letters dated April 9 and May 22, 1984. 1f you would review the record, it would become vary obvious to you that Mr. Yamamoto was the driving force behind getting the FAA to release the property to the City of Kenai for lease, and that his Concept Lease is still viable. . Tnu Municipality's recent treatment of Mr. Yamamoto can only be described as extremely shabby conoidering the time and effort that he has expended attempting to lease Lot 4. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CU14MINGS 4 AOUTit, P.C. Davi DVCIQU Enclosure cc$ Mr. Eon Yamamoto Iri - r - -- - - - - --- - - - __ -. I _ I 1 i I I I i I 1 0�. ®f& mr December 11, 1980 A, . CITY OF KE AI "Od eapi.W 4 4�a"a /, 0. AOR 1/0 111NA1. MAMA 11111 11l//NON1 313 - 71136 T0: Mayor and Council of the City of Kenai FROM: Jim Swalioy, Airport Operations Manager /sSion SUBJECT: Spur Highway Development - Gusty .Subdiv At their regular meeting of December 10, 1980, the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission passed a motion recommending that Council approve the platting of Spur Highway frontage property beginning at Gusty Subdivision, Lot 3, westward to an area beyond the Concession aroa, stopping short of ti:e unnamed crook that crosses under the Spur. The motion also states that the newly plattod land be designated commercial/rvtaii, excluding office space. 110 have a curlcept lease application on file from Mr. Ron Yamamoto for a proposed Lot 4, Gusty Subdivision. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning and Zoning motion, a drawino of the general area and a portion of a letter which Mr. Brighton rucoivod from Mr. Pattison of FAA, Plans and Programs Branch. r . 1 CITY OF KENAI "'Od edp4w 4 210 FICALOO KENAI, ALASKA S0611 TELQPHONE408•T00d April 99 1964 Ron & Catherine Yamamoto P. 0. Box 1056 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Subjects Concept Lease Application - Lot 49 Guaty Subdivision, Addition No. 1 Dear Ron, L am returning the concept lease application that you submitted to the City for the referenced property in 1978. This la not an active lease application in accordance with the Kenai Municipal Code. The deaeribed property has been platted and released for lease only by the Federal Aviation Administration. A copy of the plat and a lease application is enclosed for you information. Please be advised that your lease rent on Lot 3, Guoty Subdivision must be brought current before the City will authorize any lease agreement for the adjoining City property. Sincerely, Jet` L ashn Lond Manager Enclosure V if JL/kh I 1 � � J I H I CITY OF KENAI CajaiW ej 4Zaa,4a"" 210 F10ALOO KENAI, ALA8KA 09611 -- TELEPHONE 363.7626 May 22, 1984 Mr. Ron Yamamoto Drawer 4363 Kenai, Alaska 99611 REs Lot 4, Gusty Subdivision Addition No. 1 Dear Mr. Yamamoto: The City of Kenai asserts that you have no vested right to lease the referenced airport land. Per my letter to you dated April 9, 1964, the concept lease application was returned to you as this petition did not conform to the existing requirements of the Kenai Municipal Code. I request that any further communication regarding this matter be submitted in writing to this office. Sincerely, Je f P L abahn Land Manager JL/dg cc: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager Tim Rogers, City Attorney i N • A C � 17) Suggeated bys Planning & Zoninq CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 949-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING LOTS 1-3, SILVERTIP SUBDIVISION TO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL (RS) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.280 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, a petition has been received from James and Anita Dedrick to rezone Lots 1-3, Silvertip Subdivision from Rural Residential (RR) District to Suburban Residential (RS) District, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on June 13, 19849 and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-48. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai shall be amended as followss Section 1s Lots 1-3, Silvertip Subdivision are hereby rezoned ro Suburban Residential (RS) District. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, My Clerk First Readings July 5, 1984 Second Readings July 18, 1984 Effective Dates August 18, 1984 N i, s . j. i J � w� CITY OF KE At K i wt i, % i. wir. A win i i P14WO (007) 283.7030 MEMORANDUM TOs 9011ai Planning 6 Zoning Commission FRONs Jeff Labahn SUBJECTs Rezones Lots 1-3, Silvertip S/D, from Rural Residential (RR) to Suburban Residential (RS) DATES June 8, 1984 APPLICANT: James & Anita Dedrick Box 3636 Kensit Alaska 99611 Legal Descriptions Loto 192,&3# Silvertip S/D, Preliminary Plat, See. 34, T6N# RlIW, S.M. (Northerly 124.981 of Gov't Lot 74) Existing Zonings Rural Residential (RR) Proposed Zonings Suburban Residential (RS) Kenai Land Use Plans Medium Density Residential DISCUSSIONS The property proposed to be rezoned lies at the S.E. corner of Aliak Drive fi and Highbuoh Lane approximately 1/3 mile south of Kenai Spur Highway, The owner of government lot 74 has submitted a preliminary plot which would subdivide the property. The proposed zoning change would amend the zoning district for the northerly portion of the property having access to water & U _r _ I sewer utilities from AlLak Drive. The petitioner has not requested that 77 the balance of the property having access from Highhunh Street be rezoned at the time. However# if it La the property owner'n intention to nubdivido this property it will be necosoary to rezone the entire property and provide city wator A sewer to the loto being prop000d, The property is located in the middle of an east Kenai neighborhood which is a growing low to moderate dennity reoidential area. It ic appropriate to the rezoning of the property from RR to SR in areac that are served by City utilities. ANALVSISs The requested rezoning district is conoiotent with the exicting Comprehensive Land We Plan. All of the area to be rezoned will have access to existing City utilities. RECOMENDATIONs Staff recommends adoption of PZ84-48, ' ~ . � .,/ ' KENAI PENINSULA BOROUG11 j�,� .,..► REZONING APPLICATION I'd P�4nn► � DATE: A4 - L.+ =k y o� a v«n a„ f I PETITIONER AND i ADDRESS 13,4 -A - I C' 99MV WRITTEN SIGNATURES: LOCATED WII CITY OF: PRESENT ZONES �.1 PROPOSED ZONE: .42 S INTENDED USE AND/OR REASON FOR REZONING: This APPLICATION MAP (indicating the specific area), and a FEE be to of $200.00 (payable to Unai Peninsula Borough) must sent the appropriate official listed below: Romer Soldotna Seward Mr. ry oyster Mr. U—F-ra-rzini City Manager City of Soldotna City Manager City of Homer P.O. Box 409 City of Seward P.O. Box 335 Soldotna AK 99669 P.O. Box 167 Homer, AK 99603 (262-91,07) Seward, AK 99664 (225-8121) (224-3331) Seldovia Kenai Mr. Carl Hilre Mr. Wii=Brighton City Manager City Manager City of Seldovia City of Kenai P.O. Box 226 P.O. Box 580 Seldovia, AK 99663 Kenai, AK 99611 (234-7643) (283-7535) i y I I' �= A� L M ..ECG '.,/ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SILVER TIP SUBDIVISION (LOTS 11 2, 3) Scation 34# T6Nf Rl1Wr City of Kenai Proposed to be rezoned from Rural Residential to Suburban % Res. t1ap l) CIT, All, 9? so t from � Aonw 0 of I � Q► ti N 9 ; t Z o 0 0 0 • r Q� UV o i i i � lQga it 1p • a,- ty r, i F S 890 59, 00" 6 Ave ✓, 4f I I i i to PROPOSED SILVER TIP SUBDIVISION LOTS It 2r 3 a r, 0, — -A Suggested by: Planning h Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 950-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING TRACT A, PARK VIEW SUBDIVISION TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (RU) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.280 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, a petition has been received from the City of Kenai to rezone Tract A, Park View Subdivision from Conservation (C) to Urban Residential (RU) District, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on April 11, 1984, and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-25, and WHEREAS, the Commission also recommended a revision of the Land Use Plan from Conservancy to High -Density Residential in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-26. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai shall be amended as follo was Section 1s Tract A, Park View Subdivision is hereby rezoned To Urban Residential (RU) District. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. AITESTs Janet Whelan, City Clerk r� AWLT.Yfill First Readings July 5, 1984 Second Readings July 18, 1984 Effective Dates August 18, 1984 F• ' J i 1 i I � e - __ - _ __ _Ja _ � alb. ._I�'.•rwr.rM 4'. -__ - -w. � - -_ CITY OF KENAI r 210 FIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELWHONE 283. 7536 MEMORANDUM I i TOs Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission i Y FROMs Jeff Labahn SUBJECT: Rezones Tract A, Park View S/D, Sec. 6, T5N, R11W, S.M. a. Zoning Amendment - Conservation "C" District to Urban, Residential*(RU) District y b. Land Use Plan Amendment - Conservancy to High Density - Residential DATES April 6, 1984 a -.- BACKGROUND Applicant City of Kenai Legal Description Tract A, Park View S/D, Sec 6, T5N, R11W, S.M. - City of Kenai consisting of 2.092 acres Existing Zoning Conservation (C) Proposed Zoning Urban Residential (RU) Existing Land Use Plan Conservancy Proposed Land Use Plan High Density Residential Current Land Use Vacant DISCUSSION The property to be rezoned lies adjacent to Spruce Drive approximately 1/2 mile south of the Kenai Spur Highway. The property is bounded on the north be the Kenai Care Center, on the south by undeveloped private lands, on the west by the City of Kenai Recreational Lands and on the east by Spruce Drive. The newly constructed Women's Resource Development and Battered Women's Center lies approximately across Spruce Drive from the property. Tract A, Park View S/D is presently owned by the City of Kenai. The tract to be rezoned was removed from the Parks & Recreation category as a result of an agreement with the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service and the City of Kenai in 1980. Furthermore, the Kenai Parks & Recreation Commission declared that no recreational use for the land was needed and recommended the sale at their meeting on - March 5, 1984. This rezoning request was a result of the sale application received by the City. The City desires to rezone this property from the conser- vation district to a residential district prior to disposing of the ,.' property. ANALYSIS The requested rezoning district (Urban Residential) is not consistent with the existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan (conservancy) however the Comprehensive Plan was adopted prior to the approval of the release of Tract A from the parks & recreation category in 1980. Consequently, the City Council has recommended that Tract A is not required for a public purpose and is available for disposal. The land use designation of "high density residential" is a logical one under the circumstances as the property to the south is so classified. The rezoning of the property to urban residential, therefore, is consis- tent with the projected Land Use Plan classification. In addition, the property to the north is currently zoned Suburban Residential. RECON14ENDAT I ON � Staff recommends adoption of the following resolutions to amend the Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Official Zoning Map: 1) PZ84-26 - Amendment to Land Use Plan for referenced property 2) PZ84-25 - Amend Official Zoning Map for referenced property ® J8L:j1 •s El t __ --- ..- ..�w+.s .. -w.. ...... , .. .. � � � rr -� • ,.. s „ci-• � .. r, , mi4 • w wnwwr�v t,qw}w.--ww.w.a. _. ._ - _ 1i PUBLIC NOTICE PENINSULA CLARION 1 Public notice is hereby given that a petition has been received to rezone Tract A, Park View Subdivision Plat 179-156, Section 6, TSN, R11W, City of Kenai. Said tract is located south of Kenai Spur Highway and lies west of Spruce Drive. Presently this tract is zoned Conservation and Urban Residential District has been requested. An amendment to the Kenai Land Use Plan will also be considered at these public hearings. Public hearing on this petition will be held by the Kenai Advisory Planning Commission at its meeting on April 11, 1984 at 700 p.m., in the Kenai City Hall, Kenai, Alaska. - Public hearing on this petition will be held by the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission at their scheduled meeting of April 23, 1984. The meeting will start at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Administration Building in Soldotna, Alaska. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this petition should do so at any or all of the public hearings, or should submit a written statement to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department, P. 0. Box 850, Soldotna, AK 99669, to be received no later than April 10, 1984 for testimony before the • Kenai City Advisory Planning Commission meeting and April 17, 1984 for testimony before the Borough Planning Commission meeting. , For additional information concerning these public hearings, } contact Jane Gabler, Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department, at 262-4441, ext. 268 or the City of Kenai, 283-7535. G. S. Best ; Planning Director 11 PUBLISH 2X (March 30 & April 6, 1984) I .S KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH REZONING APPLICATION DA*: March 16, 1984 PETITIONER: City of Kenai Kenai Advisory Planning & AND ADDRESS: 210 Fidalgo Zoning Commission PHONE N0. 283-7933 i WRITTEN 1 1 SIGNATURES: �/ Land Manager - City of Ke r LOCATED WITHIN CI OF: Kenai' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Tract A, Park View S/D � PRESENT ZONE: Conservation C PROPOSED ZONE Urban Residential RU INTENDED USE AND/OR REASON FOR REZONING: City proposes to sell -�Proaerty for residential development This APPLICATION,MAP(indicating the specific area)and a FEE of $-lee O0' (payable to Kenai Peninsula Borough) must be sent to the appropriate Official listed below. HOMER Air. Larry Farnen Homer City Uanager :P.O. Box 335 Homer, Ak. 99603 (235-8121) SEIiARD Mr. C.E. Johnson City Manager ity of Seward r. 0. Box 337 Seward, AK 99664 y KENAI & SOLDOTNA Mr. G. s. Best Planning Department Kenai Peninsula Borough P.O. Box 850 Soldotna, Ak. 99669 (262-4441) SELDOVIA Mrs. Elaine Giles City Clerk City of Seldovia r. 6. Box 226 Seldovia. AK 99663 9 J "�Mfflmm ,1 7n-.- I rid! "'4h V C-3 Sugqested by: Planning & Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 951-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING PORTIONS OF SPRUCEWOOD GLEN SUBDIVISION NO. 2 TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (RU) i DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.280 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, a petition has been received from the City of Kenai to rezone portions of Sprucewood Glen Subdivision No. 2 from General Commercial (CG) to Urban Residential (RU) District, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on June 27, 1984, and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-60, and WHEREAS, the Commission also recommended a revision of the Land Use Plan from General Business to Medium -High Density Residential in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-61. .✓ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai shall be amended as follo was Section 1: Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 6-10, Block 2; and Tract F-1 are Tiereby rezoned to Urban Residential (RU) District. =' PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day yof July, 1984. i YOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: t Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Reading: July 5, 1984 Second Reading: July 18, 1984 Effective Date: August W., 1984 I? i - I CITY OF KENAI "D,;l G'a�aiidl c 4"" 210 i1DALGO KENAI, ALASKA SS611 -- TELEPHONE IIII.7535 j I June 22, 1984 MEMORANDUM TOs nai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission FROM; eff Labahn, Land Manager REs WRezone Portions of Sprucewood Glen Subdivision #2 o Urban Residential (RU) District BACKGROUND Applicant: Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission (City -owned lands being purchased by Edwin R. Lowry) Legal Descriptions Tracts F-1, Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lots 6-10, Block 2, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision No. 2; Section 5, T5N, R11W, S.M. Existing Zoning: General Commercial (CG) Proposed Zonings Urban Residential (RU) Kenai Land Use Plans General Business DISCUSSION The property to be rezoned is located adjacent to Tern Avenue and Sprucewood Road in Sprucewood Glen Subdivision No. 2, Lots 2-5, Block 1 and Lots 7-10, Block 2 has been developed as multi -family residential. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 6, Block 2 as well as Tract F-1 have not been developed but are proposed for additional multi -family residential construction. The adjacent property to the north is being developed as a retail mail. The buffer strip owned by the City of Kenai adjoins the property on the east. The land tract to the south was recently sold by the City and zoned for Residential use. Commerically zoned property adjoins to the west which has Bridge Access Road frontage. This property is also undeveloped and recently sold by the City. :fit ,__ • �11_:_•-_-- --- ._- aL— ~ - .,_,.,, - _ _.•v. ,. , .. ..� Thio rezoning petition wau ouhmitted by the Kenai Adviaory Planninq and 1"oninq Commiauion for the purpone of brinqing the zoning map into compliance with the current lease agreement and existing reoidential useu. ANALYSIS The Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the subject property as "General Business". The Kenai Zoning Map designates the property as General Commercial (CG) district. As previously stated, a portion of the subject property has been developed as multi -family residentiat. The•remai.nder of the property has been formerly approved for an expansion of i multi -family residential uses. RECOMMENDATIONS ! (1) Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. PZ 84-61 to amend the Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Plan to "Medium -High Density Residential" classification for the described portion of Sprucewood Glen Subdivision No. 2. j (2) Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. PZ 84-60 to amend the Kenai Zoning Map to Urban Residential (RU) district for the described portion of Sprucewood Glen f 1 Subdivision No. 2. Resolutions No. PZ 84-61 and PZ 84-60 are hereby adopted based upon the following findings of fact: (i) Subject property has been partially developed and entirely planned for multi -family residential use. (ii) Subject property is beinq developed in conjunction with the Urban Residential (RU) Zoning district and said zoninq district is most appropriate based upon location and utilities. (iii) Subject property is located adjacent to a Medium -Density Residential classification and approval will result in an expansion of this classification. 4 N j CITY OF KENAI KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ,?�,/-p A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING (APPROVAL) (DENIAL) OF THE REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTED BY/ / I'. F 0 R 1 4! `C[T r""/ Ll r7 /- : /t1Z f i plicant Legal Desc�on) WHEREAS, the Commission finds the followings 1. The subject property is currently zoned L4(- 2. The present Land Use Plan designation of the subject property is 3. The proposed Land Use Plan Designation for the affe ted property is lim'Ai ��.��/�' .. _�Lc'✓.rit'c_.c c 4. An appropriate public hearipg as required has been conducted by the Commission on „�,�r •+77�fG& 5. The the following additional facts// have been found to exist: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned Land Use Plan Amendment is hereby (RECOMMENDED) (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission. PASSED by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, Alaska, this ,p -7 day of 19 ' Chairman ATTEST: P'Llan-ning Seciretary 10183 J' �t . PUBLIC NOTICE. Peninsula Clarion Public notice is hereby given that a petition has been received to rezone Tract F-1, Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots 6-10, Block 2, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision No. 2. Section 5, T5N, R11W and Section 32, T6N, R11W, S.M. Said tracts are located between Kenai Spur Hwy and Tern Ave., City of Kenai. Presently this area is zoned General Commercial and Urban Residential (RU) District has been requested as the proposed district. An amendment to the Kenai Land Use Plan will also be considered at these public hearings. Public hearing on this petition will be held by the Kenai Advisory Planning Commission at its meeting on June 27, 1984 at 7:00 p.m., in the Kenai City Hall, Kenai, Alaska. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this petition should do so at the public hearing or should submit a written statement to the City of Kenai, P.O. Box 580, Kenai, AK 99611. This rezoning request will be introduced by the Kenai City Council on July 5, 1984. The public hearing will be held by the Council on July 18, 1984. Hearing will be held at the Kenai City Hall, Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo St., Kenai, Alaska, at 7:00 p.m. For additional information concerning these public hearings, contact Jeff Labahn, City of Kenai, 210 Fidalgo, Kenai, Alaska 99611, 283-7933. C. S. Best Planning Director PUBLISII 2X (June 12 and 19, 1984) . I KENA I PrX INSULA BOROUGH REZONING APPLICATION DATE: May 22, 1984 �tiy19?•...:r,t�.,. r • PETITIONER: City of Kenai Irm AND !:acamed ; ;) ADDRESS: 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 `•2 f:nna� p on anp naps VPHONE NO. 283-7933 IX WRITTEN SIGNATURES: •� l_P.w�D t-iA#jA-MEtL- LOCATED WITHIN CITY OF: Kenai -- - - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Tract F-1, Lots 6-10, Block 2 , And Lots 1-5, Block 1, Sprucewood Glen S/D No. 2 PRESENT ZONE: General Commercial (CG) PROPOSED ZONE Urban Residential (RU) i INTENDED USE AND/CR REASON FOR REZONING: To conform with lease which stipulates this Portion of aroaerty for multi -family units. _ This APPLICATION,biAP(indicating the specific area)and a FEE of $400 00 (payable to Kenai peninsula Borough) must be sent to the appropriate official listed below. 1t0: U:R Mr Lam Pn rnr,n llumer City Manager P.O. Box 335 Homer, Ak. 99603 (235-8121) Mr. C.E. Johnson City %tanager City of Seward P. 0. Pox 33- Seward, AK 9466.1 KENAI & SOLDOTNA Mr. G. S. Best Planning; Department Kenai Peninsula Borough P.O. Box 850 Soldotna, Ak. 99669 (262-4441 ) '::•s. i:l:,ine Gild Cit•. Clerk GIt O: Seldf)via Suldovia„ fit. 99603 i c.liyr�• �� , .... ,. � ,,.. .,a_.. �. .ate ,�,. .... . CITY OF KENAI KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ fl-�o A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING b ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING (APPROVAL) (DENIAL) OF THE REQUESTED REZONING SUBMITTED BYs / f • c' e 41eyt FOR 7; (�•�/, LCT'� /-�� �J CC Applicant (Legal Description f ��B � •(1`. ����� ?- �n�'ttLP/.ct".�(9lf•�'7 Jam,//� ?✓Ct,�,� . WHEREAS, the Commission finds the following: 1. The subject property is currently zoned e�A' 2. The proposed zoning of the subject property is J 3. Amendment to the Land Use Plan is CO , (UNNECESSARY) 4. An appropriate public hearing as required has been conducted Jby the Commission on Owl *I 5. That the following additional facts have been found to , exist: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned rezoning is hereby (RECOMMENDED) (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission. PASSED by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Commis ion of the Cit of Kenai,Alasks, this day of 19iz. Chai rm n AT TEST s I VrL anning cretary J 10183 �a AJ I N t 4^ p c RS *41 SPUN -v r s RS PQ�o�i�ca'�'� a r�� o .::;� :� !j 11 Rl A l5pruce.wool OIC'm SA A.. Z. 1 #0 Ke%al' MaT • l 7' p 9 TUMN .S R:� _..-,r..eY V,�I�Ii..YI_-M1-'+1.�. _ _ _ _NYC Ls.• _ _ — st�� ' /.•HYlit�r J., ,.. ..._ .. �- �-.. ♦rr-- ♦. rR-..n-+.-r .- •... ryna c�r .s ��•mad J Suggested bys Planning & Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 952-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING LOTS 1 & 2, WALKOWSKI-DELAND SUBDIVISION TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (IH) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.280 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Will Jahrig to rezone Lots 1 & 2, Walkowski-Deland Subdivision from Conservation (C), Rural Residential (RR) and Suburban Residential (RS) Districts to Heavy Industrial (IH) District, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on June 27, 1984, and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-58, and WHEREAS, the Commission also recommended a revision of the Land Use Plan from Conservancy, Medium and Medium -High Density Residential to Heavy Industrial in accordance with Resolution No. PZ84-59. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai ahall be amended as follows: Section 1: Lots 1 & 2, Walkowaki-DeLand Subdivision are hereby rezoned to Heavy Industrial (IH) District. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: WAGONER,TOM R Janet Whelan, City CIM First Readings July 5, 1984 Second Readings July 18, 1984 Effective Date: August ..8; 1984 J ' 1- - r" CITY OF KENAI %0d eaa" of 4Za„ 210 FIDALGO KENAI, ALASKA 90611 i TELEPHONE 283.7635 , 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: ai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission FROM-.f Labahn, Land Manager RE:one Lots 1 & 2, Walkowski-Deland Subdivision ee Heavy Industrial (IH) District BACKGROUND , Applicants Will Johrig i P. 0. Box 51 ', q Kenai, Alaska 99611 (petition - authorized by legal executor Clayton E. Erwin) N Legal Descriptions Lots 1 & 2, Walkowski-Deland Subdivision, Section 4, T5N, R11W, S.M., consisting of 6.578 acres i Existing Zoning: Portions Rural Residential (RR), Suburban Residential (RS) and Conservation (C) Districts ' =1 < Proposed Zoning: Heavy Industrial OH) t I Kenai Land Use Plan: Portions Medium and Medium -High Density Residential and Conservancy 1 �.� designations DISCUSSION The property requested to be rezoned is located on the north side of Kenai River Bridge Crossing Road, immediately across the road from the Chevron Bulk Plant. The applicant has requested rezoning to Heavy Industrial (111) for the purpose of developing - an electric shop storage yard for equipment/boats/vehicles and - w.� retail/wholesale of industrial equipment. The current zoning — districts (Rural Residential, Suburban Residential, Conservation) j -- prohibits the intended uses. There is no City water or sewer available to the property. i 1 � r , J f 1 i The subject property is located in an area characterized by heavy ^ commercial and industrial activities. Existing uses in the area J include a cannery, bulk plant and gravel pits. The property and adjacent area has not been developed for residential uses. ANALYSIS The Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Official Zoning Map defines the property as residential with a drainage greenbelt. However, this property and the surrounding land has developed as a heavy commercial/industrial area. It would not be advisable to encourage residential development at this location. Therefore, an industrial zoning district is most appropriate for the property as Heavy Industrial zoned land adjoins on the south. There are two possible negative impacts which may result by approving a Heavy Industrial district for the subject property. First, the property is relatively close to the recent addition to Central Heights Subdivision (Portlock Street). However, the property requested to be rezoned is moderately treed and substantially below the residential subdivision elevation. The second consideration is the drainage area that crosses the property. In checking the aerial photographs, the existing drainage area does not correspond with the corridor designated on the zoning map and land use plan. It actually crosses only a small corner of the subject property and it is a minor drainage area which is difficult to define. 1 conclude that the Kenai Zoning Map, based upon the Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Map, is inappropriate in designating any of the subject property as residential use and is in error regarding the location of the designation of the conservation corridor. RECOMMENDATIONS (1) Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. PZ 84-58 to amend the Official Zoning Map to Heavy Industrial (IH) district for Lots 1 & 2, Walkowski-Deland Subdivision. (2) Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. PZ 84-59 to amend the Kenai Comprehensive Land Use Plan to Heavy Industrial classification for Lots 1 & 2, Walkowski-Deland Subdivision. Resolutions No. PZ 84-58 and 84-59 are hereby adopted based upon the following findings of fact: W Subject property is located in an immediate area characterized by existing heavy commercial and industrial development. (ii) Subject property is best suited for an expansion of existing heavy commercial and industrial activities. 1 Y 707 i Y � • -n (iii) Subject property is located adjacent to an existing r, Heavy Industrial (Ili) zoning district and approval will result in an expansion of this zoning district. (iv) Subject property is located adjacent to a Heavy Industrial land use map classification and approval G, will result in an expansion of this classification. (v) Existing Conservation (C) district and Conservation land use map designation does not correspond with the j existing drainage area. i r v r I - ,y -. ... �'.. .,-...-... ' n•r/Iih:w'•.. •. ram.- - .., .. _ _ fly ��-.(•W+. __. _ .. .,..a. .... .�......... ..e.,.... . r ,..r ,. «« .. ..-......- .. �-..ter► r-..ary CITY OF KENAI KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZXVf„j,y i ii A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING & Z014ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING (APPROVAL) (DENIAL) OF THE REQUESTED REZONING SUBMITTED BY: f 0 R I � k /V'a? �l %t 4 %' a� �! u �[� -✓i�e1 ���<j p lican-tLegalDescription) WHEREAS, the Commission finds the following: I 1. The subject property is currently zoned 2. The proposed zoning of the subject property is Z ' 3. Amendment to the Land Use Plan is NECESSAR (UNNECESSARY) 4. An appropriate public he - ring as required has been conducted ' by the Commission on �•, <, A 5. That the following additional facts have been found to exist: �ic.C,ut2z. �2a� lam �u•,t�' - . N6W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advisory Planning & Zoning i Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned rezoning is ; hereby (RECOMMENDED) (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission. PASSED by the Advisory Plannipg & Zoning Commies n of the Cit � 1 j of Kenai,Alaska, this .27 day of 19 ; Chairman i t� ATTEST: i, - annin a retary © 1 l83 _ 'I t CITY OF KENAI KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ r c A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING (APPROVAL) (DENIAL) OF THE REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTED BY •! FOR Gc'�iS ��'.�7,�/ �1�., oL n/ lican legal Description i WHEREAS, the Commission finds the following: 1. The subject property is currently zoned 2. The present Land Use Plan designation off the subject proper t y is A7,,I1 p,4//, /1/� .f,i / i cf 3. The proposed Land Use -PI n D ignation for the affected property is / i 4. An appropriate public hearing as r quired has been conducted by the Commission on 5. The the following additional facts have been found to exist: j� NOVI, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned Land Use Plan ` Amendment is hereby (RECOMMENDED) (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission. PASSED by the Advisory Planning & Zoning Com ission of t City r" } of Kenai, Alaska, this day of (Thair �r ATTEST: 4 anninq 5ekr6tary • 10183 z�1 I7 .. ��.-e :. • ... ._..- ♦r ...... ... •_ .ram- .... .. _ - �- .. .. f7,Nypr(rc.r.tar.rsr- -- _' . - • . �:' /f .��' . ..: . PUBLIC NOTICE Peninsula Clarion Public notice is hereby given that a petition has been received to rezone Lot 1 and Lot 2 Walkowski-DeL=4 Subdivision Plat K-83-57, Section 4, TSN, R11W, S.M. Lots are located North of Beaver Loop Road and east of Walker Lane, City of Kenai. Presently these lots are zoned Rural Residential, Suburban Residential and Conservation. Heavy Industrial has been requested as the proposed district. An amendment to the Kenai Land Use Plan will also be considered at these public hearings. Public hearing on this petition will be held by the Kenai Advisor.-f Planning Commission at its meeting on June 27, 1984 at 7:00 p.m., in the Kenai City Hall, Kenai, Alaska. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this petition should do so at the public hearing or should submit a written statement to the City of Kenai, P. 0. Box 580, Kenai, AK 99611. This rezoning request will be introduced by the Kenai City Council on July 5, 1984. The public hearing will be held by the Council on July 18, 1984. Hearing will be held at the Kenai City Hall, Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo St., Kenai, Alaska, at 7:00 p.m. For additional information concerning these public hearings, contact Jeff Labahn, City of Kenai, 210 Fidalgo, Kenai, Alaska 99611, 283-7933. G. S. Best Planning Director PUBLISH 2X (June 15 & 22, 1984) • J T' Q e1REA TO BE REZONED R 9 '� g' TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL v s 9 ar• MID, L& • J M y AQ MAP TR Is RAL SUB. NO. ss 4 A YE LEY E . IST u S sic JtqL*Q#41VD I KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH REZONING APPLICATION 'DATE: Clayton E. Ervin • PETITIONER: � ; 1 I V rI %� R G AND ADDRESS • �a ��f �% ��iUR-1 —Ns legal executor of property, PHONE NO. �, �,3 Iv A � J— hereby signs Will Jahrig legal right to petition for rezoning WRITTEN SIGNATURES: of listed property . LOCATED WITHIIJ CITY OF: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: wAL Kos S1GI - O� L,4�Q &019A O;Sidle) ,vw % ,� Sw 'lk SfCA-oN y Rq,jg PRESENT ZONE: RuAvw- E'Si0Lr t-D v,#L Ke"r; oEA*,AL1 Cousc ypr cw PROPOSED ZONE —��-yy ..L w 4 v $4gi ,¢' L INTENDED USE AND/OR REASON FOR REZONING: FKDA;9� Al Sir USED 44 L*aA(ie-AL /XO 8r�CP,G� YARD foR �Q��p� /QoRfSI �Ey�cldt -- W*d f whCLP SAL- 4 �Noucl,Qik ZOG-'o This APPLICATION,IIAP(indicating the specific area)and a FEE of %49-rAO (payable to Kenai Peninsula Borough) must be sent to the appropriate official listed below. HOnn Mr Larrt Firnen Har,or Cit;• "..anager P.O. Box 335 Homer, Ak. 99603 (235-8121) 5 Mr. C.E. Johnson City Manager Citti o: se::ard r. 0. 33" Se•4ard, AK 99664 KENAI & SOLDOTNA Mr. G. S. Best Planning Department Kenai Peninsula Borough P.O. Box $50 Soldotna, Ak. 99669 (262-4441) --sine Giles Cl--,,..Cleric Ci: Of Sel"'Ovia r^ :;cx :=6 Seluot•il, AK 996o3 x" 1 07M QWIIA AiW+IA CarP A ' • •v. %Orr •-r •VIA NT —w W. .-r� 20 . 47 i MSS io4 i t i I •fr W Q t! d AR I• We y Itl. , WALKowsxr - M LAUD Sus. (x-sa • s 7) R 1965 AOtb :NJ;ll AI! 281184 All Oil I044 /6 for it I Assessor's Map Kenai Peninsula Borough. Alaska NATO — A.WYV Rbv4 Nnmlws ihn" In PROM t. 1 -_ ,I.. f".•..�11:w�.: _ ...sr.-� -- .-, .n ,.r r' r - rwu. •.. y n. i 1 • r . _W Cso - Suggested by: Admin. CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 71 /t A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WALKER LANE EXTENSION TO ZUBECK, INC. FOR THE AMOUNT OF $86,828.84. WHEREAS, the following bids were received on June 14, 1984 at 2 p.m. for the above referenced project. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID Zubeck, Inc. $ 86,828.84 L 6 C Services, Inc. 87,206.00 Harley's Trucking 86,176.00 Hall Quality Builders, Inc. 99,771.94 Engineer's Estimate $100,923.00 WHEREAS, the recommendation from Harold Galliett, the project design engineer, and the Public Works Department is to award the contract to Harley's Trucking for the total cost of $86,176.00, Q and WHEREAS, Harley's Trucking's bid is the lowest responsible bid but award to this bidder would not be in the best interest of the City since they are not a City of Kenai local firm, and WHEREAS, Zubeck, Inc. is a local contractor doing business and established in the incorporated limits of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai can award this contract to Zubeck, Inc. without substantial or prohibitive additional costs to the City as permitted by Kenai Municipal Code'7.15.040 (b), and WHEREAS, sufficient monies are appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF t: KENAI, ALASKA, that the contract for the construction of Walker Lane Extension be awarded to Zubeck, Inc. in the amount of $86,828.84. �. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of June, 1984. / F= :) 1014 WAGLTNE MAYOR ATTEST: net Aftelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: 'I y, • k it •SJ l Suggested by: Admin. CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WALKER LANE EXTENSION TO HARLEY'S TRUCKING FOR THE AMOUNT OF $86,176..00. WHEREAS, the following bids were received on June 14, 1984 at 2 p.m. for the above referenced project. CONTRACTOR TOTAL, BID Zubeck, Inc. $ 86,828.84 L & C Services, Inc. 87,206.00 Harley's Trucking •86,176.00 Hall Quality Builders, Inc. 99,771.94 Engineer's Estimate $100,923.00 WHEREAS, the recommendation from Harold Galliett, the project design engineer, and the Public Works Department is to award the contract to Harley's Trucking for the total cost of $86,176.00, and i WHEREAS, Harley's Trucking's bid is the lowest responsible bid and award to this bidder would be in the'best interest of the City, and WHEREAS, sufficient monies are appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the contract for the construction of Walker Lane Extension be awarded to Harley's Trucking in the amount of $860176.00. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 20th day of June, 1984. TOM W GUNER, MAYOR ATTEST: -Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances �i A � Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-76 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE WALKER LANE EXTENSION CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. From: Contingency <$653> To: Construction $653 This transfer provides money for the additional cost of awarding construction contract for Walker Lane Extension to Zubeck, Inc. (a local contractor). PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 5th day of July, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet he an, City Clerk Approved by Finance: 1 i 1 f - 1 C. (0 } Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A LEASE FOR AN AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE AT THE KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO PENINSULA SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE AMOUNT OF $1,200 ANNUALLY. WHEREAS, the following bids were received on July 6, 1984, at 2 p.m. for the aforementioned. Bidder Total Bid Peninsula Savings & Loan Assn. $1,200 annually WHEREAS, Peninsula Savings & Loan Association is the lowest responsible bid, and WHEREAS, the recommendation of the City Manager is to award the lease to Peninsula Savings & Loan Association for the total annual lease payment of $1,200. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the lease for an Automatic Teller Machine at the Kenai Municipal Airport be awarded to Peninsula Savings & Loan Association. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: ' Janet Whelan, City Clerk I C-7 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A LEASE FOR A KENAI MUNICIPAL BAR CONCESSION AT THE KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO SANDRA K. DANIELS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $4,100 PER MONTH. WHEREAS, the following bids were received on July 6, 1984, at 2 p.m. for the aforementioned. Bidder Total Bid Sandra K. Daniels $4,100 per month Aese Alaska, Inc. $2,019 per month WHEREAS, Sandra K. Daniels is the highest responsible bid, and WHEREAS, the recommendation of the City Manager is to award the lease to Sandra K. Daniels for the total monthly lease payment of $4,100. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the lease for a Kenai Municipal Bar Concession at the Kenai Municipal Airport be awarded to Sandra K. Daniels. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk .1 il Suggested by: Admin. L - /1 CITY OF KENAI J RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, GIVING CITv OF KENAI SUPPORT TO THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH SEPTAGE/SOLID WASTE CODISPOSAL INCINERATOR PROJECT IF, AND ONLY IF, CERTAIN STIPULATIONS ARE ADHERED TO. WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough is presently having a feasibility investigation done on the Septage/Solid Waste Codisposal Incineration by Weston, Designers, Consultants, and Tryck, Nyman, and Hayes, Inc., Engineers, Planners, and Surveyors, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai understands some of the problems that the Kenai Peninsula Borough has in undertaking their responsibility of handling Septage/Solid Waste Disposal, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough is considering a site near the City of Kenai's Well House No. 2 via access through City of Kenai lands and right-of-ways. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City of Kenai go on record as being in support of the Septage/Solid Waste Codisposal Incineration Project if, and only if, the following stipulations are met. 1. No septage or solid waste nor the ash from such waste shall be disposed of at the site of the project due to the site location being near Beaver Creek and the City of Kenai's two Well Houses and the fact that the site has a relatively high water table. We ask that the ash or the residue be transported elsewhere. 2. The Kenai Peninsula Borough along with the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation and/or Environmental Protection Agency shall fund the extension of the Kenai Sewer System to the project site to handle the washed down water and wastewater generated on site. Again due to the high water table and our artesian wells located in the area, the City of Kenai does not want to see wastewater lagoons or injection of this material back into the ground water. The City of Kenai understands that the City will have to bear the cost of maintenance and operation of the sewer line and treatment of the wastewater (septage from outside the City) but feels that the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, and/or EPA should handle the Capital costs. W i i 3. Upon completion of the project or sooner, the Kenai Peninsula Borough will close and rehabilitate their existing landfill n located on Redoubt Avenue within the City of Kenai. '�- With the above listed stipulations being met, the City of Kenai supports this project and will work together with the Kenai Peninsula Borough in applying for grant funds from the State and Federal Governments in support of extending the Kenai sewer . system to handle the liquid waste from this facility. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. TOM MGM, MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk 1. •%J w I 1 ,7 ,r q 5-.J f�/+ . "1 Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA. _ WHEREAS, AS 43.20.016(a) requires the governing body of a municipality to approve a resolution requesting municipal assistance funding, and WHEREAS, this resolution must be submitted to the Department of Revenue or the Department of Community and Regional Affairs, and i WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has a fiscal year beginning July 1 and , ending on June 30, and J WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is desirous of receiving municipal assistance funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TJ KENAI, ALASKA, that the Council of the City of Kenai, Alaska by this resolution hereby requests distribution of funding from the municipal assistance fund to the City of Kenai by the Department of Revenue on the date required by law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day i of July, 1984. i OM WAGONER, MAYOR a ATTESTS 1' Janet Whelan, City Clerk ,V j z ., f • r is C-10 Suggested bys Councilman Wise CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION N0, 84-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING ENFORCEMENT OF THE NON -CONFORMING LAND USE PROVISIONS OF KMC 14.020.050(f). WHEREAS, the Kenai Municipal Code provides for the continuing non -conforming use of land provided such land use is not expanded, and WHEREAS, tho Kenai Peninsula Borough is operating a land fill, sanitary fill, garbage dump in Section 36, T6N, R12W, S.M. in an area zoned Rural Residential, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code of the City of Kenai does not permit a land fill, at al, in such a zone either as a permitted use or as a conditional use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City Administration is hereby directed to notify the Mayor of the Kenai Peninsula Borough and the Assembly President that expansion of the Borough land fill, Section 36 T6N, R12W, S.M., in the City of Kenai will no longer be permitted. i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to OQA"' Commissioner N , State of Alaska Department of Environmental 1v;o� Muria",vn, with a request that upon expiration of the current CA Nsto DEC Land Fill Permit, that said permit not be extended for this non -conforming use. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1964. . TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk U I I I I . yF� Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SETTING A DATE OF PUP.LIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED SPRUCEWOOD GLEN ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City has been petitioned to establish an assessment district for paving, drainage, off street parking, water, and sewer in Sprucewood Glen Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the City must hold a public hearing to allow comment on the proposed assessment district before proceeding with the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that a public hearing be held on August 15, 1984, at the regular Council meeting of the City of Kenai for the purpose of discussion of a proposed assessment district in Sprucewood Glen Subdivision. - PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk 4. P 1 a i } I f o , i J I 1 1 I --I /` CITY OF KENAI 10d G?apd4l of 44u" 210 PIDALGO KENAI, ALASKA 85811 TELEPHONE 283. MS July 12, 1984 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL i FROM: Charles A. Brown (For William J. Brighton, City Manager) {, 1 " SUBJECT: Proposed Assessment District, Sprucewood Glen The City has received a petition from Ed Lowry and Tommy Partee for _ an assessment district in the Sprucewood Glen area. They have asked for the following improvements: 1. Storm sewers and drains on Sprucewood Road and Tern Avenue extension. 2. Construction of Tern Avenue extension. r' 3. Asphalt concrete pavement on Sprucewood Road and Tern Avenue. 4. Off street parking facilities on eight lots in Sprucewood Glen Subdivision (Lots 2-5, Block I and Lots '7-10, Block 2) . 5. Sanitary sewer stub outs at Tern Avenue 6. Sister mains connecting Tern Avenue to Walker Lane and associated stub outs and fire hydrants. As the Council knows, the City generally requests that petitioners waive the 25Z ruie limiting the amount that may be assessed and agree to accept 1002 of proportioned costs. Lowry and Partee have not done this, but agreed verbally to supply such a Letter. .. The City of Kenai is the other property owner in the proposed , district. We own the Greenbelt near Walker Lane, plus Tracts D & E. Schilling and Tyler are in the process of purchasing Tracts D b E. f Therefore, I am requesting that they supply the City with a similar request for an assessment district (even though they are not the legal owners as of today). I asked for this because the debt would i� be a lien against the property and be transferred to a new owner upon -- a sale. 0 1 Page 2 To varying degrees, the improvements will benefit the following parcels: The Greenbelt Tract D, Sprucewood Glen Tract E, Sprucewood Glen Tract F, Sprucewood Glen Sprucewood Glen, Bl. 1, Lots 1-6 Sprucewood Glen, B1. 2, Lots 6-10 All parcels are benefited by road improvements, but storm drainage, parking, and water and sewer extensions benefit only certain lots. Public Works estimates that the cost of these improvements would be about $227,000.- No grants are available. The administration agrees with the scope of the improvements. We intend to assess 1002 of the costs. Financing will be accomplished by a bond sale that is scheduled to take place within 90 days. Review the supporting workpaper for the preliminary assessment roll for more detail on benefited lots. Below is a tentative schedule of how we could proceed. Manager Report 7-18-84 Preliminary Assessment Roll 7-18-84 Set hearing for 8-15-84 7-18-84 Advertising 7-27-84 8-1-84 8-8-84 8-14-84 Individual Notice 7-24-84 Introduce Finance Ordinance 8-1-84 Hearing and Resolution, and Finance Ordinance 8-15-84 A review of the preliminary assessment roll shows that the City will pay about $33,901, if we sell Tracts D & E. If we don't sell Tracts D 6 E, the City's share will be about $93,312. By the July 18, 1984 Council meeting we should have the amended petition from Lowry and Partee and a petition from Schilling and Tyler. If we do not, I will report on it. As an owner, the City must request the formation of the district. I have talked to the City Manager about this and he believes we should participate. Page 3 Therefore, the Council should adopt the following motion at the July 18, 1984 meeting: t-. "Move that the City participate in the proposed Sprucewood Glen assessment district based upon the benefits received by City property. In Cj addition the City waives the 25% limitation and agrees to accept on a proportional basis 100% of the costs of improvements." The City Code (KMC 16.05.100) says that one method of assessment is by computing the cost of installing the improvement past the parcel. Based upon the the variety of improvements and mix of subdivided and unsubdivided land, I deemed this to be the most fair method of spreading the cost. However, that same code section says that unless Council provides otherwise, the method of allocation will be on a square footage basis. Therefore, I ask for the following motion: "Move that the method of allocation of costs in the proposed Sprucewood Glen assessment district l be based upon front footage, rather than square footage, of benefited property." u is 1 r i � yu 4 i li 4 x OS Fos, (WALKER. LANE). .,;;' -f I '. , ". , , ' SOUTH '9* 599 OgiA4 TRACT F 3.030 AC, // jd�� 7 TRACT 606 AC, /I Wes lot, lat. i YOU; i'Oi ...... . . . . . . T. Vv� tilt' 1110; 11 P'Pr� I fill 1.1 It a 111.1 IN m u No HIM lie 11 min i's's d I li!MiEifll�IdNll 19YII��l��� HE I ��� IIlII�I IIA���Ilin�{I��� Ill�ll�llfl!IIII��NINII ..................... 1111 1ul UJUH1 PIA11 i - SPRUCEWOOD GLEN SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PREPARED JULY 12, 1984 Estimated Lot Omer Assessment City Greenbelt City of Kenai $ 33,901 Tract E City of Kenai* 46,853 Tract D City of Kenai* 12,558 Tract Y Ed Lowry 26,327 B11, 1, Lt 1 Ed Lowry 7,204 to Lt 2 Ed Lowry 10,408 of Lt 3 Tommy Partee 11,425 to Lt 4 Tommy Partee 10,996 to Lt 5 Tommy Partee 10,143 00 Lt 6 Ed Lowry 1,695 Blk 2, Lt 6 Ed Lowry 13,641 to Lt 7 Ed Lowry 9,766 of Lt 8 Ed Lowry 9,712 of Lt 9 Ed Lowry 10,728 of Lt 10 Ed Lowry 11,643 227.000 * Proposed to be purchased by Schilling and Tyler. i, i`. 1 I i i e 0 e -/2 v v. Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-84 Ir A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, k AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE TO TAjXC; INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT ENTITLEOs SOUTH HIGHBUSH, BUMBLEBEE, EAST ALIAK, SWIRES, AND HIGHBUSH ROAD FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $29'pH4. ,ham!) 3 WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received proposals from the following firms: Taeac, Inc. Mike Tauriainen, P. E. Wince-Corthell-Bryson Wm. J. Nelson b Associates S do S Engineers, Inc. WHEREAS, the Public Works Department feels that it is in the beat interest of the City of Kenai to award this project to Taeac, Inc. WHEREAS, sufficient funds are appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that a contract be awarded for engineering design services to Taeac, Inc. for the design of the project entitled: South Highbush, Bumblebee, East Alisk, Swires, and Highbush Roads for a not -to -exceed amount of E29,224. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk TOM WAGONER, MAYOR /' C-�� CITY OF KENAI "Od eap4W ej 4"Oop 210FIDALOO KENAI,ALMKA 99611 TELEPMONE283.7534 MEMO TOs Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director FROMs Jack LaShot, City Engineer REs Engineering Proposals Received July 12 - "South Highbush, Bumblebee, East Aliak, Swires, and Highbush Roads" DATES July 13, 1984 The following firms submitted proposals for the referenced project. Firm Fee (Not -to -exceed) Project Construction Management (Est.) Wince-Corthell-Bryson $40,200 $65,000 Taeac, Inc. 29,244 63,692 Wm. J. Nelson h Assoc. 36,000 10: of construction S 6 S Engineers, Inc. 25,560 32,080 Mike Taurisinen, P.E. 390885 60,000-80,000 The Soldotna branch office of S h S Engineers, Inc. submitted the lowest fee for design of this project. The City has not previously contracted with this firm for engineering services, however, they ` should be quite capable of performing the work. I would prefer, due to the large amount of work that Public Works is now doing, to reduce coordination by selecting a firm we work with frequently. ('Also, if S do S is chosen, it would not be reasonable to expect Ito negotiate a fee for construction administration near their timated fee of $32,080. This is based on a 90-day construction schedule and 40 hour work week, which is not reasonable to expect. To properly inspect this project, we probably will need a budget of $60,000 or more. The Kenai firm of Trans -Alaska Engineering submitted a fee of $29,224 for design and their estimate of $63,692 for construction administration appears in line. Trans -Alaska has chosen to submit their proposal through their construction company (Taeac, Inc.) in order to provide E A 0 insurance in the amount of $1 million, per our'requirements. This was done in order to be 1 more competitive with their fee. The City has a good working relationship with this firm, which now has its main office in Kenai and no longer is a part of Professional Design Associates, also located in Kenai. For reasons stated, the resolution will read to award the contract to Taeac, Inc. (Trans -Alaska). Should the City Council award the contract to S & S Engineers, I would not object, as this firm is eager to establish itself with the City. The City Council can decide which firm is the most "local". S �, _ _ _ _ __ _- ��,�;t_ _ ::'t.. La 1!/. r:: �Ir=rrtr._a-- _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ ice• Lair—�iiii'L..(1�� I I Suggested bys Administration j CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-85 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE AIRPORT TERMINAL PARKING CAPITAL PROJECT FUND: i Froms j Contingency 01,850 To: s Construction $1,850 This transfer provides money for painting and striping the Airport Parking lots and driveways. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances_ 10 • J DEPART119N ALCOHOLICS Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai P.O. Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR T UR REVENUE 201 EAST 97H. AVENUE EVEWECIONTROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 July 9, 1984 04557f:, ti Dear Ms. Whelan, We are in receipt of the following application(s) for transfer liquor license(s) within the City of Kenai You are being notified as required by AS 04.11.520. • BEVERAGE DISPENSARY LICENSE LARRY'S CLUB; G.C. & Jo Jarvis and John D. Barry and Milton L. Usleaman; Mile 1 North Kenai Road; MAIL: Box 8312, NRB, Kenai, Alaska 99611. Transfeered from: G.C. & Jo Jarvis. Same D/B/A and location. J. A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the T I approval of the application(s) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the • J /' . I board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons7n support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE MUNICIPALITY MUST COME FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT Its SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS 04.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) munici- palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro- hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.145(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to pro- test an application if a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or con- sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS 04.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. Sincerely, ,D Betty L. Calhoon Records A Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 BLC:vk Enc. j . 11 0 /f - AGENDA 1� KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING JULY 5, 1984 - 7s00 PM WORK SESSION - 6s30 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL f 1. Agenda Approval I 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and ---- -- will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be _ removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General - Orders. `• J 1 B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 1 1. Grizzley Aircraft - Screening Junk Site . C. PUBLIC HEARINGS _= 1. Ordinance 899-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Float Plane Basin - $200,000 a. Substitute Ord. 899-83 - $25,000 2. Ordinance 944-84 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Interest Charged on Assessment District •, ' 3. Resolution 84-76 - Transfer of Funds - Walker Lane i Project - $653 4. Resolution 84-77 - Transfer of Funds - 1st 6 2nd - _..; $6,768 I 1 0. � MINUTES a '7 , 1. *Regular Meeting, June 20, 1984 / E. CORRESPONDENCE A t t I o 1 r. „. F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. *Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. *Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. *Ordinance 949-84 - Rezoning - Silvertip S/D 4. *Ordinance 950-64 - Rezoning - Park View S/D 5. *Ordinance 951-84 - Rezoning - Sprucewood Glen S/D 6. *Ordinance 952-84 - Rezoning - Walkowski-Deland S/D 7. Discussion - Airport Main Apron Extension Additional Engineering Design S. Discussion - Disposition of Tracts - Dena'ina Pt. Estates S/D 9. Discussion - Lease Application - CIIAP - Howard, Garner & Smith 10. Discussion - Vacation of Section Line Easement - Sprucewood Glen S/D & Spur S/D 11. Discussion - Vacation of Portion of E. Aliak Right of Way 12. Discussion - Thompson Park Gravel Pit 13. Discussion - Airport Noise Problems 14. Approval - Airport Ramp Overlay & Itinerant Aircraft Parking - Change Order #2 - Harleys Trucking - $629412 1 15. Discussion - Lease Amendment - Dan Pitts, FBO S/D i H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission S. Recreation Commission a'r 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT n I yy1 0 J KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES JULY 5, 1984, 7s00 PM KENAI CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAYOR TOM WAGONER, VICE !IAYOR RAY MEASLES, PRESIDING 'LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL Presents Tom Ackerly, Sally Bailie, Jess Hall, Chris Monfort John Wise, Tom Wagoner Absents None RAY MEASLES ARRIVED - 8100 PM. A-1 Agenda Approval a. Mayor Wagoner asked that item 6-1, Grizzley Aircraft - Screening Junk Site, be deleted. The problem has been resolved. Is. Mayor Wagoner asked that item C-12, Discussion - Thompson Park Gravel Pit, be deleted. The problem has been resolved. C. Mayor Wagoner asked that item G-1, Harley's Trucking, Nelson 3 Assoc. bills be deleted from the Consent Agenda for discussion.Finanee Director Brown suggested Harley's Trucking bill be after item G-14. d. Mayor Wagoner asked that item G-16, Board of Realtors, Games of Chance b Skill, be added. Material was distributed this date. e. Mayor Wagoner asked that item G-17, Cemetery Committee, be added. f. Mayor Wagoner asked that item C-5, Ordinance 953-84, Airport Ramp Overlay 8 Itinerant Aircraft Parking, be added for introduction and public hearing. Material was distributed this date. Council approved the agenda as amended. A-2 Consent Agenda MOTION$ Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to approve the Consent Agenda, deleting Harley's Trucking and Nelson h Assoc. bills from item G-1. Motion passed by unanimous consent. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 899-83 - Increasing Rev/Appns-float Plane Basin- $200,000 a. Substitute Ord. 899-83 - $25,00O MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilman Wise, to adopt the ordinance. There was no public comment. MOTION, Amendments Councilwoman Bailie moved, neconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to amend the motion with substitute ordinance included in packet. R � KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 Page 2 Councilwoman Rallis asked that the Council consider tie downs for planes ownod by Individuals in the Kenai area. Mayor Woqoner suggested this be given to the Airport Committee. Councilwoman Bailie noted it would cost Leos to do with this item than to do later. Councilman Wise said if they follow the Wince, Corthell, Bryson study, they will have design of the float plane basin, wetland permits, FAA approval and tie -downs. He questioned if there was enough In this to do all this. City Manager Brighton said the $200,080 figure to for this purpose. With the amended figure, we will need additional money, this to just for engineering. VOTE, Amendment: Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote. VOTE, Main Motion as Amended$ Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-2 Ordinance 944-84 - Amending KMC - Interest Charged on Assessment District MOTION$ Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to adopt the ordinance. There was no public comment. Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-3 Resolution 84-76 - Transfer of Funda - Walker Lane Project $653 MOTION$ Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to approve the resolution. PUBLIC COMMENT, a. Ron Davis, Harley's Trucking. He asked Council to reconsider their action and for an explanation. Atty. Rogers replied, the record accurately reflects the reasoning of Council. He had a tape made of the minutes and will give it to Mr. Davis. It would be inappropriate for Council to get into the reasons unless they have a change of heart. He understood the reason was because the firm was local. It had nothing to do with responsible bidder doctrine. This is permissible. Mr. Davin asked if Council would foresee this in the future, there could be real repercussions. Atty. Rogers replied it is a subjective thing, the Code as written refers to the beat interests of the City. b. Gary Davis. He said the competitive bid was awarded to other then the low bidder. The reason was the ordinance that gave preference to contractors with an address in the City. He has a possible interest in Harley's bid, which was low bid. He is supportive of local support, but Kenai and Soldotne could be considered local. Mayor Wagoner explained he made the motion, and did not know who the Harley's people were. He just knew it woo not Kenai. ' i KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY S, 1984 Page 3 VOTE (Failed)s Yost Bellie, Wise, Wagoner Nos Ackerly, Hall, Monfor Tie vote fails. Mayor Wagoner asked if it had been awarded. City Manager Brighton replied no, Administration had been directed by Council to award, Administration has the ability to transfer without Council approval. But because of the controversy, Administration brought it back to Council. Councilwoman Bailie said Council should look at the ordinance. If we are going to ignore it, we should look at it better. Councilman Ackerly asked if there was an amount specified in the ordinance. Mayor Wagoner replied no, the city attorney had said not to tie to a rigid figure. The State allows a 5% difference. Mr. Davis noted the State had done away with that. Mayor Wagoner said they had done away with local hire, not preference without Federal funds. MOTION, Reconsiderations Councilman Wise gave notice of reconsideration of Resolution 84-71, for the next meeting. C-4 Resolution 84-77 - Transfer of Funds - 1st 6 2nd - $6,768 NOTION: Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Notion passed by unanimous consent. C-i Ordinance 953-84 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Airport Ramp Overlay & Itinerant Aircraft Parking, Change Order 02 - $62,412 MOTION, Introductions Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to introduce the ordinance. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. NOTION, 2nd Readings Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to have 2nd reading this date. Notion passed by unanimous consent. MOTION, Public Hearings Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to adopt the ordinance. PUBLIC COMMENTS a. John Williams. Thin was not on the agenda. Mayor Wagoner explained, this item was brought in this date. Copies are on the table. This ordinance appropriates $62,000 from existing funds, this expenditure is not grant eligible but has been approved by Council. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. i 1 - I' 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 19R4 Page 4 D. MINUTES Minutes were approved under the Consent Agenda. E. CORRESPONDENCE Nan* F. OLD BUSINESS None G. NEW BUSINESS G-1 Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Nelson 8 Assoc. - $6,767.08, S4,395.33s MOTIONs Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to approve the payment to Nelson 6 Assoc. Motion passed by unanimous consent. G-7 Discussion - Airport Main Apron Extension Additional Engineering Design Public Works Director Kornelis explained, when we got the grant, Airport Manager Swalley, Engineer LaShot and they engineers had a meeting regarding the best way for the funds to be used. Instead of 375' runway, they narrowed it to .300 _%%fund extended further to the north. It would open up •ore leased Iota and give access by Willow and by the ramp. City Manager Brighton added, when we received the grant, the State had written it for a ramp extension, not for taxiway extension. The State said we could alter it. Mr. Kornelis said the 375' will match the existing runway. He noted Mr. Swalley had said 300' was sufficient. Mayor Wagoner said there should be a circular radius in the southwest corner instead of an acute angle for better flow of planes without a sharp turn. Councilman Wise asked if this would require modification of the airport master plan. Mr. Kornelis replied it would have to be approved by FAA. Davo Johnson, M. Tsuriainen Engra., said this should be in accord with the master plan. MOTION$ Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to accept M. Tauriainen's proposal to redesign the main apron extension to include items as set forth in the memo of June 1984. Councilman Wise asked that this be referred to the Airport Committee. Mayor Wagoner explained the committee was appointed for the float plane basin and makinq recommendations on property went of the runway. They are private pilots that wanted to deal with this problem. He suggested it be sent to FAA. He added he would like to form a committee combining the airport and harbor. VOTE (Psoeed)s Yens Ackerly, Bailie, Hall, Monfor, Wagoner Nos Wise G-2 Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 Approved by Consent Agenda. J a n KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 P aqo 5 G-3 Ordinance 949-84 - Rezoning-311vortip 5/0 Approved by Consent Agenda G-4 Ordinance 950-84 - Rezoning - Park View S/D G-5 Ordinance 951-84 - Rezoning - Sprucewood Glen S/D Approved by Consent Agenda G-6 Ordinance 952084 - Rezoning - Walkowski-DoLond S/D Approved by Consent Agenda G-7 See item G-2 G-8 Diocuaaion - Disposition of Tracts - Dena'ins Pt. Estates S/D MOTIONs o , Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to approve dioposition of tracts an portrayed by Land Manager Labohn. .. Councilwoman Bailie naked about the conveyance deed, 03 on the Issues to be discuooed. Land Maffeger Labohn explained, Council and P&Z had sold there ought to be a provision for purchasers to deviate from the plana commissioned by the City. They would have to work with PW Dept. and P&Z. This would be diacuoaed on a caso-by-coos baoia. Atty. Rogers noted this would not be in the conveyance document. Councilman Ackerly asked about covenants. Mayor Wagoner replied, the setback from the bluff and restrictions on the integrity of main streets and utility systems. Councilman Ackerly noted we could sell 4 tracts of such size it would limit smaller developers in the community. Mayor Wagoner said uniese the City develops major portions he could see no way we can develop. Councilman Wioe said there could be joint ventures for development. ; COUNCILMAN MEASLES ARRIVED AT THIS TIME (OsOO PH). i VOTE (Possed)s Yens Bailin, Hall, Meaaloo, Monfor, Wise, Wagoner „ - Not Ackerly G-9 Discussion - Leese Application - CIIAP - Howard, Corner & Smith Land Manager Labohn reviewed the application, it has been approved by P&Z. The only problem was the werehouaeo were not specifically allowed In general commercial zone. The completion dote io Auguat 1986. MOTION$ Councilman Wine moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hanfor, to approve the Inane application. Councilman Hine nald they were told this wan a permitted —J use, it to not. It would require a variance. MOItONs Councilman Nine moved to refer this item to P&1 for discussion regarding the warehoune. RENAI C11Y LOUNC11 3111. Y 11, 19114 Page 6 Mayor Wagoner moved the mutton out nl order, ao thoro waa a motion on the /lour, Land Manngor Iahahrl axplalnnd, warohounoa have boon allowed to the pant In goneral oammsrotal, but the aontng dada for not spnolflo an thin Item, Tho oubjent wau brought op after P4% had approved thin. there watt no objection by P41 regarding the warobouoea. VOTE (Paneed)I Yon Ackerly, Baltic, Mall, Maaolon, Nonfor, Wagoner Not Wloe MAYOR WAGONER LEFT Al 111IB TIME (0 00 PM), VICE MAYOR MEABI,f11 AOOUMEO 111E CRAIR. 4-10 Otacustilon . Vacation of Geotion Line Easement - Gprucewood Glen 0/0 h Gpur 9/0 N011ON1 Councilman Wltts moved, seconded by Councilwoman Dellis, to approve the request. Motion pegged by unanlmoun oonoent. 0-11 Discussion - Vacation of Portion of E. Alisk Right of Way MOTIDNI Councilman Wigs moved, oeoonded by Councilwoman Ocilla, to approve the request. Councilman Nall suggested postponing till street improvements arm done, the City may need all that portion. Engineer Laghot said we hove sa-buiits on location of the utilities. VOTE (falled)s yes None Not Ackerly, Rallis, Hostiles, Nonfor, Wiss Councilman Nall abstained so he was a party to tho petition, 6.13 Divousslon • Airport Noise Problems City Manager Brighton explained, s few wsske an Alaska Airlines woo practicing landing till late at night, There were many objeetiona, Adminintrotion wrote letters to all sirlinsa looking there riot to practice after IWO PH and before 610O AM. Technically thorn to nothing the City can do but Reeve, hso amid they will adhare, Cnuncilman Wtoo auggeated the City nould rescind the no -landing Ins policy, The notes abatement ordinance could be, aged. 0-14 Approval - Airport Romp Overlay A Itinerant Aircraft Parking Chsortn Order 02 - Marloy'a Truoking - $62#412 040110041 Councilman Aeksrly rsovcd, neeonded by Councilwoman Monfort, to approve tho change order. Notion puooed ur►tinimouoly by roll call vote, IOf I I KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 Page 7 G-1 Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Harloy•e Trucking - $102,142.57 MOTION$ Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to approve the bill. Finance Director Brown explained the change order was part of the total. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. G-15 Discussion - Lease Amendment - Dan Pitts, FSO S/D Land Manager Labohn explained, there are 2 parts to the amendment. Dan Pitts is leasing lots 1,2 & 3. This would re -plat to Is, 2a & 3s. 2a would have access with ramp easement, 3a would be unchanged. The 2nd part is improvements on 2a & 3a. The existing building is on Is. P&Z recommended approval. Councilman Ackerly asked if the current lease holder is in good standing, Finance Director grown replied no. MOTION$ Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, for approval of re -plat of FBO 1s, 2a & 3a. Councilman Ackerly noted there woo no check list. Land Manager Labahn explained, this is concept. The 30' easement was not'there before, the re -plat will establish. Dan Pitts. He requested the re -plat so the building would be on its own lot. It would allow his to develop without encumbering ail 3 lots. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. G-16 Cemetery Committee City Manager Brighton explained Mayor Wagoner will have the list of suggested members for the July 18 meeting. G-17 Games of Chance & Skill - Peninsula Board of Realtors Approved on Consent Agenda. H. REPORTS H-1 City Manager City Manager Brighton spoke. a. The Grissley Aircraft problem has been resolved. Administration will renew their request. b. In the packet for the June 20 meeting, there was Information regarding the EMS contract with Dr. Hansen. The contract expired June 30. Chief Winston recommended we contract with the hospital. Administration needs direction from Council. MOTIONS Councilwoman Sallie moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to go with emergency services at the hospital. ' 1 1 , r . 'f • R v i a I i 11� i it KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 Page 8 VOTE (Passed): Yea: Ackerly, Bailie, Hall, Monfor, Wise Not Measles C. The National Guard has requested a permit for summer operations on the north edqe of the City. This was referred to P&Z. They have been granted winter permits. P&Z said no to summer because vehicles might be used in wetlands and a possible negative impact on migration of caribou. They will only have foot traffic. The State has no objection. Information is in the packet. Council took no action. d. Public Works Dept. passed out a packet of information this date. He asked Council to review the information, it includes information requested by Council. e. He has received 30 applications for airport manager's job. He will hire next week. f. Councilwoman Bailie asked, what is the status on the sign ordinance? Land Manager Labahn replied, P&Z has had their 2nd hearing and is comfortable with it. Councilman Wise suggested a survey of signs in the City to see if they are legal. City Manager Brighton noted there are 49 signs in one 3-block area, there are many in the City. Councilwoman Bailie objected to the t portable signs. Land Manager Labahn explained the ordinance will not be before Council till Aug. 15. Councilwoman Bailie asked that the present Code be amended to make portable signs illegal after a maximum time. Councilman Wise asked that flashing signs be banned. g. Councilwoman Monfor noted last November a PR man had been presented to Council to promote the City. Action was postponed till summer. City Manager Brighton noted Mayor Wagoner had asked for a work session as soon as possible on capital improvement projects and the brochure. h. Councilwoman Monfor asked if we had started on the brochure on City accomplishments. Mr. Brighton replied no. Councilwoman Monfor noted this is a perfect time, with all the visitors here. She suggested newspaper ads, articles & pictures in Alaska Magazine. There are people living here who do not know what the City and Council have accomplished. Councilman Ackerly suggested mass mailing. 1. Councilwoman Bailie asked if Administration could apply for All-nmerice city award. City Manager said he would apply in November. H-2 Attorney Atty. Rogers spoke. s. The No -Smoking law is in effect as of July 17. It. The airport bar and automatic teller machines. The City has absolved litigation with the former client and have had a pre -bid conference. Bid openings are July 6. He will report at the July 18 meeting. 1 i' .-�J %Y',!�'•.-._ .. . iti./. w. .LICE �� .j KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 Page 9 C. He and City Manager Brighton will not attend the July 18 meeting. They will be meeting regarding the gas contracts. d. The new legal assistant is Nathan Callahan. He will be here about Aug. 1. e. Councilwoman Bailie asked if the revisions on the By -Laws for the Council on Aging are complete yet. Atty. Rogers replied no. H-3 Mayor None H-4 City Clerk Clerk Whelan spoke. a. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board submitted a notice of changes in the Statutes, included in the packet. There is a new criteria for tourism - restaurant or eating place. The applicant must be given an opportunity to defend the application if the municipality objects; the municipality must appear at the hearing if there is objection; the Board will deny an application for transfer if less than one year has passed since application of new license. Councilman Ackerly said it should not be by population, it should be open, it is a false market. Free enterprise would take care of it. Vice Mayor Measles noted this does not change anything that doesn't already exist. Atty. Rogers agreed, this will be a detriment to small business. MOTIONt Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to send a letter objecting to increasing the criteria because of adverse impact on small communities. VOTE (Passed): Yes: Ackerly, Hall, Measles, Monfor, Wise No: Bailie MOTION: Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to notify ABC that we are in opposition to new chqnges in the State law regarding local governing body defending denial of application. This is a hardship problem for the communities. Clerk Whelan noted this section of the law is already in effect. Council agreed to request it for next year. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. b. Petitions for the 2-3 yr, seats on the Council are available at this time. Filing period is Aug. 3 to Sept. 3. C. Council is invited to a no -host breakfast with Sen. Stevens on Tues., July 17, 8:00 at Merit Inn. H-5 Finance Director None i i. . a t KENAI CITY COUNCIL DULY 5, 1984 Page 10 H-6 Planning A Zoning None H-7 Harbor Commission City Manager Brighton said tie attended the last meeting. The intent is they are requesting engineering design to accomplish the bulkhead dock fuel facility but are waiting till all funds are committed. The small boat harbor is on the back burner as not economically feasible at this time. Till design is brought back to them and the other $900,000 is in hand, they will hold. H-8 Recreation Commission Recreation Director McGillivray spoke. a. The minutes of the last meeting will be at the July 18 meeting. b. The fitness trail is complete, the dedication will take place when the plaque is received. C. They have been installing playground equipment as it is received. d. They will be planting grass next week at Main St. by the ball fields, and by Time Saver. e. The planters have been planted and placed throughout town. f. Councilman Wise noted there is broken glass in the playground by the Fine Arts Center. Mr. McGillivray said they have picked up glass there many times. g. Councilwoman Monfor said everything look great, she hoped Administration was taking pictures for the All -America City application. The City camping park has been kept up very well. h. Councilwoman Bailie noted the triangular piece of property in front of Time Saver. She would like it set aside as a green strip. Land Manager Labohn had said an application to lease had been made, PAZ A Beautification Committee had wanted to have it retained as City -owned land. There are also utility lines there. She asked for a resolution at the July 18 meeting. Mr. McGillivray asked for a water outlet at the location, there is a water line there. Mr. Brighton noted the driveway will be curbed up and Parks Dept. will seed it. Mr. Kornelis said temporary barricades will be placed till the concrete is placed. H-9 Library Commission Librarian DeForest spoke. a. The library has been full of fisher people this summer. b. The Federal Grant has been received. a J- /` ,.....n..►at•. :.rya :ai-.:.�-..�?icV.-sT'►.'X J KENAI CITY COUNCIL JULY 5, 1984 Page 11 I. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 9. Public Works Director Kornelis spoke regarding the Eagle Rock petition distrihuted this date. The problem is that the City cannot use oil to control duet, so the residents want it left to slow traffic. Those using it want it smooth for campers. The petition woe signed by those living there. According to the petition, there are 6 people living there. MOTION: Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to defer maintenance on that road till Sept. Atty. Rogers suggested Council just make their desires known to Public Works that it is low priority. MOTION, Withdrawal: Councilman Wise, with consent of second, withdrew his notion. b. Councilmen Wise asked that Administration research dust control measures and, within 90 days, submit a proposal for use next year. City Manager Brighton said the fellow who swept the streets sold he would submit a proposal, but has not been in yet. Public Works Director Kornelis said he had checked into some systems. It would be about $30,000 for one application, plus $70 an hr. for the truck. C. Councilwoman Monfor asked what the street sweeping schedule was. Public Works Director Kornelis replied, there is no schedule. It is done as needed. d. Councilwoman Monfor said everyone in Thompson Park is pleased with the road work. e. Councilwoman Bailie asked if any action had been taken on the letter regarding digested sludge. Public Works Director Kornelis replied it may be costly. Councilwoman Bailie noted we are spending much money on fertilizer, she would like to try it. Mr. Kornelis said the regulations are very specific. They are proposing inside the airport fence only. That is ideal. f. Carmen Gintoli, Architect. He submitted a proposal for Council consideration. He has been working on the Community Center project since 1978 and would like to see it completed. The City likes competition, could they commit without competing? They would be dealing with Kenai firms. There are no electric/mechanical firms in the area, so he would have to use the Anchorage firm he has used for years. Atty. Rogers said from a legal standpoint, it is professional services and is not subject to competitive bidding. Public Works Director Kornelis said at the last meeting Council directed Administration to go out for Requests -For -Proposal. Unless directed otherwise, they will go out next week. Councilman Ackerly asked if there were firms not included that are in the City? Mr. Gintoli replied, engineering but not architecture. City Manager Brighton said Administration has worked with all these people and has no problem with their work. A J KENAI CITY COUNCIL DULY 5, 1984 Page 12 MOTIONt Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to direct Administration to negotiate a contract with the proposed individuals and prepare a funding resolution. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. ADJOURNMENTi Meeting adjourned 1005 PM. 42� Janet Whelan City Clerk A 'ram y w I 11 • rI 1 of w.,'-.....,, .,. •., ..� ...... ..... .,.�•„ . ..r .,. .i-rr- .'e,.- rr.> Joe Lampman Box 1747 Soldotna, Alaska 99669 June 21, 1984 407 1.�% City of Kenai OA f `" 210 Pidaigo v r� Kenai, Alaska 99611 �r�8ljjrt:,;::'•" ,. Dear Mayor Wagoner and City Council Members: This letter is in regard to the proposed changes involving Title 20, Chapters 20.05 Taxicabs. I support the proposed Ordinance #914.84 as suggested by the administration relating to the aforementioned subject. I believe this new ordinance will be easier for everyone to work with including the administration, enforcement, and obeyance by all interested parties. The present ordinance (Chapter 20.05) only tends to create a paperwork jungle containing unnecessary rules and regulations (some of which are conflicting) which hinder and discourage the competitive and free enter- prise system of business and helps to create a monopoly situation. The present ordinance is somewhat antiquated and cumbersome for all interested parties to work with. The proposed ordinance appears to adequately cover what should be neces- sary to ensure the safety of the public, provide reliability, service and convenience, plus the freedom of choice offered by competition and free enterprise. I fully support proposed Ordinance #914.84 and recommend passage by the City Council of Kenai. Respectfully, �oe M. Lampman d/b/a Soldotna Cab cc: City Manager City Clerk Chief of Police City Attorney I , i 1 I.r I A :1 /r e f �I i� 3 � i i ( k: b i • ff f- 1 I� O �f DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER POUCH 0, JUNEAU, ALASKA 99911 June 14, 1994 Dear Alaskans 465-2600 Thank you for your interest in the final decision regarding the pollution control technology required of Tesoro Petrole- um Company. I have enclosed information relative to that decision as you requested. Your comments were encouraged as part of the public input necessary for me to reach this decision. I appreciate your participation and also encourage you to remain abreast of the environmental issues for Alaska. I'm sure that if we can all continue to work together, Alaska will remain the clean and beautiful state that it is. Thank you again. CNscd Enclosures ancerely, 1� , Christopher Noah Deputy Commissioner 1 ,. a ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC) Public Notice of Final Determination A40111 on Air Quality and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation's Proposed Expansion of Their Kenai Refinery June 15, 1984 SCOPE This document presents the final determination by the DEC to approve an increase in air pollution resulting from the proposed expansion of Tesoro Petroleum Corporation's Refinery under the requirements set by state regulation 18 AAC 50.400. GENERAL INFORMATION The Federal Clean Air Act and state regulation 18 AAC 60.400 require review and approval of the construction or modification of major sources of air pollution resulting from increased emissions of regulated air pollutants This review is to assure air quality is not deteriorated beyond allowable limits and tho Bost Available Control Technology (BACT) is applied. BACKGROUND .. On June 16, 1983, the DEC received from Tesoro Petroleum Corporation a complete permit application requesting approval to expand their Kenai refinery from 48,000 to 80,000 barrels per day and process the higher sulfur content North ' Slope oil. The DEC, with assistance from the federal Environmental Protection Agency, reviewed this and other relevant documents and presented a preliminary determination in a public notice on December 30, 1983. In this preliminary determination the DEC set a 99.9% level of control for sulfur dioxide (502) emissions from the proposed sulfur recovery unit as "BACT", considering environmental, energy and economic factors. This limitation would result in 11 tons per year of S02 emissions at maximum operating rates. Tesoro Petroleum Corporation had proposed that a 98.5% level of S02 control represent the BACT resulting in S02 emissions of 167 tons per year. ' In a public notice dated March 23, 1984, the DEC notified the public of a change in the preliminary determination, The DEC at that time set a 98.5% level of control as representative of BACT. PUBLIC COMMENTS A public hearing was held April 23, 1984, to receive public comment on the revised preliminary determination. Fourteen persons attended and two persons gave testimony. Both individuals opposed the increased air pollution which would result if the control efficiency were set at 98.5%. Written comments were accepted until May S. In consideration of ten written requests from the public and a request by the Kenai Borough Assembly, the public comment period was extended to May 16. In response to requests from the public and elected officials from the Kenai Peninsula, a . second public hearing was held In Soldotna on May 31, 1984. Twenty-nine persons gave testimony, with twenty-seven testifying in favor of stricter controls. Public comments were accepted until June 5, 1984. Of the 125 letters sent to the DEC on this subject, over 95% were in favor of stricter control technology and minimum changes in air quality. Fins! BetewH •nY0Yi•nw O June 15, 1eV'•9 DECISION On June 13, 1984, the DEC made a final decision, defining BACT in this case to be 99.9% control of.potential S02 emissions. The main factors in requiring the 99.9% control technology are the environmental and technical unknowns which persist. Tesoro's economic position should improve with the granting of the royalty oil contract and low interest pollution control bonds. Also, questions remain regarding the effects of emissions from the refinery on the health of the citizens and the flora of the area. This decision is based on the fact that the DEC's primary role is to protect • human health and the quality of the environment. A combination of factors indicate that the higher control technology is both available and feasible. FINDINGS Based on review by the DEC, the emissions from the Tesoro refinery expansion 1. Will not cause a violation of the Ambient Air Quality Standards or Increments set by 18 AAC 50.020, 2. Will, for emissions above those set by 18 AAC 50.300(a)(6)(C) be controlled by the Best Available Control Technology, and the emissions from the sulfur recovery plant will not exceed the standard of 500 ppm. •3. W111 not adversely affect the air quality related values of noise, odor, visibility, vegetation and soils of the state. In addition, the activity is determined to be consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program and fulfill requirements under 6 AAC 50. FURTHER INFORMATION i Copies of documents relative to the department's decision can be obtained by writing the Air Quality Supervisor, Department of Environmental Conservation, Pouch 0, Juneau, Alaska 99811, or viewed at the department's regional office in Anchorage or district office in Soldotna. I 98tta0 in Juneau this [iL#-day of June, 1984. r stop er N"-IF, Deputy Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation .. ki - ----- - — - --- _ _-- -- - - 5,-3 f City of Soldotna y BOX 409 PHONE 762•910/ �` ) fOt00TN/4, MASK "669 f i J �w CITY OF OPPORTUNITY (q.S.'e�o-ee- July 5, 1984Federal Aviation Administration,•Billie B. Cox, Acting ManagerEzn�?°% Operations, Procedures and Airspace AAL-5 701 C Street Anchorage, AK 99513 My Fellow Public Servants: We have very recently received a partial copy of Aeronautical Study No. WAAL-113-OE pertaining to a proposed steel tower to rise 406 feet above mean sealevel and to be located within the Soldotna RNAV Runway 7 approach. This letter is sent to voice objection to the construction of the communications tower. The Airport Commission of the City of Soldotna was made aware of this proposal only this week. From the USOOT-FAA report we have been informed that the final approach fix waypoint must be raised from 700 feet to 900 feet and be relocated if the construction is allowed. Further, the tower would be the contrulling obstacle in the intermediate segment for our; proposed NDB/OME Runway 7 approach. 4 a110 We note that considerable obstruction would also result at the Kenai airport. Surely there are many sites which could be chosen by i Peninsula Communications, Inc. which would be better for their purposes. Safety of users of both airports will be jeopardized if the tower is permitted. The guyed steel tower must not be allowed as proposed. Si cerely, Donald A. Backus Airport Manager DAB:mg I i I ti j 4 a If RVQUI91TIONS OVER $1,000,00 WWI 11PPO 0)(19GII, APPROVAL 7/1.0/114 Ifff ANOW Aardvark Pumping pumping Park Toilet# P*060 Repair & x9into 1,0w),00 Alaska Cleaners VY64-89 IAUndfY OffWCS Werjous "iffeLlaneous 4,550,0() 5 6 C Supply High Pressure flog Water Cleaner An Omtrol ffachInsry 6 Equipment 1,060'0) M.---Pourfi-Cent painting flervice Non-Papartimental W"I-110partmir"tal Rypotr & NOW, 2'"1'00 Hanson Painting Painting Directional Linos at ep-Tarminal parking Gonstruetion 1'810,00 Terminal Parking 1,09 IBM 1014 Typewriter Gamunicationa Machinary & &jtiipxanL 1,611.00 Kenai gustom Interiors Woe" Blinds for son Room WA-Upagrogaw Must* Onall Toola 1^2,00 Kenworth Alasks Rebuild Transmission for Whop Repair & "41"t. Supplies 2,230.00 Virg Dept, Tanker Motorola portable Radio Poll" Haefit"ry 6 Equipment 2,327.00 Yukon office supply &W Whine 6OA-Aee#ss ff"'hjn*ry 4 Equipment 1,2o.00 I 0 /` .I yr VAYMYAYfO OVY.R 01,000.0A (OIiCH UBBO 0JU1101. AVPRf)VAI, (19 NATIVI(:AT1011 7.1H•84 r (, �v ��,� Af1UlUYf POY V,nSlnaerfng cV•ilartror Otudy V.aglneering 3,190.00 TAMN Inspection 04vorgreen, Re, Tntpaetion 11,424.83 _ - Mike Taurialnen S CP•1tt N 2"d Ott. Construction 84,NM .9N Drosses Conttf+►ct/on Pay gat. tin. 97,427.30 inspection Cp-lnmpton Park Ott, Inspection Nlnce, Corttwli, Bryson r➢aftvWxon Park sits. ConatrUctiOn 104,110.02 construction Unlimited pay pot. Uo.l 1,023.82 53011 Moors Buaiswtt Vorrwt A/D ctreeks pinance Office 9uppliet Rainier latlonal Bank Principal 1990 GO.g„ndt 1980 (;0 Bonds Principal Interest 00 to 000.75 15,333. Interest you milptVATlOIIs 22,201.88 H alters & Olson Mist. city Insurance Mnn-Aepartiwntai Insurance ' honer V.lectrie June glactri+:ity Usage Vtrlout IJtllitles 22,493.59 01+np Opersting Supplies gwvron USA council on Aicot,olise Gasoline state Revenue Relshurse"nt Jlon-Oepartmuntal Grants to Agencies 1,219,50 ,95 I 6eok inlet central Peninsula Mental flealtb state Revenue Refsrbu►rsefient Nnn•UepartM►rntsl Paantt to Agencies 3,239.0 Shop operating Bupplies 1,616.02 lloyle't Poe! Alttel Phone Service Vnrlous contunfcatinna 2,808.29 Glacier State .tune Natural Ott Usage Various Utilities 1,149,72 f!UU(:O National Bank of Alaaka .funs lbill Central Treasury Central Treasury control Treasury central Treasury 1,300,000.00 1,103,213.53 10A ins. t 12.1G Ins jrexsurygpo 7/12/94 ' 7/7/8/i Central Treasury central Treasury 1,093,018.34 10.91% Ins :I putt pedertl Bank RYpO t? � s 1° p a /` - - 1 1 Sug(je tt ed bys Planning & Znninq CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 954-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KMC 14.05.060 FOR Tiff PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING, AN APPLICATION FEE FOR REZONING PETITION$. WHEREAS, tho City of Kenai tt"a aaaumod the authority for xoninq adminiotrat.ion, and WHEREAS, KPB 14.02.280 eatablinhea a procedure for oubmittinq a petition to amend the Kenai Zoning Code and Official Map, and WHEREAS, it is the reaponoibility of the City of Kenai to eatablioh an appropriate Poo to be oubmiltod with aueh applicationa, and WHEREAS, an application fee of $200.00 in deemod appropriate to defray the exponneo incurred by the City, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commiaaion has adopted ftoaolution No. PZ84-57 recommending thia foo. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11 ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, no followas Section 1s 14,04,060 Feess In order to defray the oxponaoa connected with=u conaldoratinn of applicationa for variances and conditional uno pormits, the poroon prenonting the application shall pay to the City Clerk a fee in the amount of $100. A fee in the amount of $200 shall accorn an art apelleation for omon men o Me I(OnOl Zoning code or urricial Hop, to er an applicalion to granted or donioa 5y Me Comm aaJan, the potitioner or applicant shall not be entitled to the return of the fee paid. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thin tat day of Auguot, 1984. A11ESTs Janet ears, Cify Clerk First Readings 3uly 18, 1984 Second Roadinqs Auqust 1, 1984 Effective Onto$ September 1, 1904 I1 1 I II I I w A. 2 W ` CITY OF KENAI Kenai Advisory Planning b Zoning Commission Resolution PZ84-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, ESTABLISHI%G AN APPLICATION FEE FOR PETITIONS TO AMEND THE KENAI ZONING CODE AND OFFICIAL MAP. WHEREAS. the City of Kenai will assume the authority for zoning ! administration effective July 1, 1984, and WHEREAS. KPB 14.20.270 describes the procedure for submitting a petition to i amend the Kenai Zoning Code and Official Map, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is responsible for establishing an appropriate application fee for such a request, and I WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough was formerly responsible for processing these requests and established a $200.00 application fee to cover actual costs incurred for advertising and mailings, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has adopted similar requirements for processing a rezoning application, and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish this fee prior._to the assumption of the zoning power. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING h ZONING C0144ISSION that a $200.00 application fee be established for an amendment petition to the Kenai Zoning Codb and Official Map which shall become effective on July 1, 1984. PASSED BY THE ADVIS RY PLANNING b ZONING CONMISS N OF THE. CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this day of IaIRNa,+ ATTESTS Planning ecretary J bl8+ W /` ii:ri.rlh�ii�i.�l�ii{.'i,.��.�.S�ii'r�i�"- - - ��rya�.�r+..r�e�►erir ( ;r — / Suggested by; City Council CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 955-64 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KMC 14.20.230, SIGNS AND ADVERTISING DEVICES, TO RESTRICT THE USE OF PORTABLE AND FLASHING SIGNS. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai currently regulates signs and ad- vertising devices as governed by the Kenai Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, the existing sign code section has not been amended for several years, and WHEREAS, considerable concern has been raised regarding the safety and appearance of portable and flashing signs, and WHEREAS, such signs have proliferated within the City of Kenai during recent years, and WHEREAS, the Council desires to restrict the use of these signs by amending the signs and advertising devices section of the Kenai Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thets Secs KMC 14.20.230(a) is amended as followss (a) General requirements: (1) A permit shall be obtained from the administrative official prior to the installation of any sign, nameplate, advertising sign or advertising structure excepting those less then four square feet in area. Construction and erection of signo shall be in accordance with this chapter and with all other pertinent regulations. (2) Signs permitted under this section shall advertise only the business or activity being conducted on the immediate premises. 1 I I F 1 ' 1 • ' I 1 1 i y 1 i :I Y" Y t Ordinance 955-84 Page 2 (3) No sign shall be erected at any location where by reason of the position, shape, or color of such sign it may interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with mauthorized traffic sign, signal, or device. No sign other than public signs shall be placed within 10 feet of any intersection as measured from the nearest intersection of street right -of way lines. (5) [FL.ASHING SIGNS AND INTERMITTENT ILLUMINATION ARE :I PERMITTED ONLY IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL. ZONES. (6)] In all residential zones, lighting shall be indirect and shielded from adjacent property. Section 2s KMC 14.20.230 is amended by adding a new subsection as followss (d) Signs prohibited in all zoness (1) Flashing or intermittent illumination signs are not permitted except time and temperature and automatic changing message signs. (2) Portable signs are not permitted except in commercial or industrial zones subject to the following conditionss , [i] Portable signs may be displayed for not more than one week and must comply with all requirements of this Code. When such sign is removed, it may not be returned to that site within one year. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA# this 1st day of August, 1984. ATTESTS Janet Whelan,, City Clerk TOM WAGONERt MAYOR First Readings July 18, 1984 Second Readings August 1, 1984 Effective Dates September 1, 1984 N .��:ace- •��:--,::r.,, r - - -- — ' J Sugyeuted bys Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 956-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $95,942 FOR DESIGN OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER. WHEREAS, the City has received a proposal for design of a Community Center at a cost of $172,942, and WHEREAS, the Community Center Capital Project Fund has an available balance of $77#000 for doaign, and WHEREAS, the General Fund Capital Improvement Reserve has an unaudited balance at June 30, 1984 of $200,503, and WHEREAS, the Council desires to accept the design proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, that the following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be modes General Fund nerease stimated Revenues Appropriation of Capital Improvement Reserve $ 959942 Increase Appropriations Non -Departmental - Transfers $ 95,942 Community Center Capital Project Fund nerease Estimated Revenues Transfer from General Fund $ 959942 Increase Appropriations Engineering $ 959942 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this lot day of August, 1984. ATTESTS Janet Wholent City Clerk First Readings July 18, 1984 Second Readings August 1, 1984 Effective Dates August 1, 1984 N Approved by Finances ,e'9Q r� • • A I+ O 3 .. I l l 6 1� J I l • I' - -A V CITY OF KENAI "Drl igaja, l 4 44"0' 210FIOALOO KBNAI,ALAfKA II0011 TILEPMONN M•fa35 July 139 1984 MEMORANDUM T0s Wm. J. Brighton, City Mannqer FROMs Keith Kornelia, Public Works Director REs Community Canter Design and Inspection 1 have looked at Mr. Gintoli's proposal dated July 12, 1984 for the subject design work which amounted to a total design fee of $1900090.00. I felt some of the cost figures were relatively high and expressed so. Mr, Gintoli has responded by lowering his proposal to a total of $172#942 so per his letter dated July 13, 1984. Below are acme figures to keep in minds 17,700 square foot building $150,00/square foot (hopefully high) a $29655,000.00 Site development 500 000.00 Total Construction Cost Estimates s3t'UU0.U0 Design Costs $ 172,942.00 Surveying* - 5,610.00 Soils* 7,300.00 r • UU #AIA recommends that owner provide Basic Rate as a Percentage of Construction Costs $ 160 032 = 5.07% • Attached is a graph I received many yearns aqo on AIA recommended compensation for basic architectural services. Based on all information I have received, Mr. Gintoli's proposal is very reasonable. If the City Council wants the Community Center 100: designed and ready to go out for competitive bids by December 1, 1984, I would recommend approval of this proposal. 99/dq Attachment --V, - -./ i I AIJUSKA CHAPTLA OF 111F., A14I.I4ICAN INSTI'i'UT1•: OF AR HIT.C.TS f7 f`f1fAML 1.t r1Y� ����Il w•A�c rl h�T f,r.r vnn tixvirr nr,fa,ta.vnhnr»st V1V fit Jr 9n1;14 15.00 � PRO�t:C'P� �rve .•r..t ; ��%AlIP1.64 ' :: : •.,: !TF: • + 1 GROUP.A tructuros for , " ' ;ronoitch 3ahi; puler,aor,tori Lllfdttry. ' ..' : , ' t '" scientific use + .0 bleations llAing, eorsnu ee tars f., 14.00Ir �':. ,1!t: {11t: ,�.►: �:': ��! , I t ...� , ; • . • , ; ; , �bdiAJisfd �Gildln�(!'"!d ; . 'cblybyd•"and Uril4ttelty' ifso�tibff"�{bfi" e�lligt' , r . �. �' • ; r r , i ' , , , , , + tdtiCatlon ' :w , . 1 , {nil unlveraity Physics 1ebff obslrvetorlts, r ! • :: � � }fr sedietl schools, schools for the axe# tion{1 ohtld : �f' - + o!d service isclllties ;� roatur{nts, osfotor!{o, dlnlr+� h{Ils, ' 1i tonrrtrctsl, lnstltutlo,.6 r� 13,00 »,r,. _ �� � :1 �_�:: • t loriii processing j•' i _.,:� educationalr .! • i ( I.i ; i rrlShcngs fo� ; 1 ' chapels, ehurehft, topples, synagogutt, ; ' Also note Group • for ct A: , j 1 ► I i . i : , : i _ i ( saliglous use' , . : ; . 'related fieillt os I ; .. .... 1 and Parochial schools i♦ r•. „ , i • " " rivatn•Clubi ,» • country clubs, yacht clubs, • tennis clul,s, i i {j ; ; , ! ' j ' 12.00 .., • ' • • , : ' 1 .. golf clubs, YY.CA nelgld,orhood Centers t ' • • ' • _ • { : ; , • 1 : • + p i % � i ; ; �.t ! ; i i • �' altural atrvCturas ; ; i ++ theLers, srtrsettrut •gol leffea, Concert halls, ; t w ; • , inanalal structures �~ bank', savings, and loan but dings( i p11.00 'fyecialLsod gllvtrlwhilt '" ; , 'coutthoutesi 'silkosv tb i's,: jails; .., I `''7— "+S. :• . " buildings , prisons, juven! o hall*,I «'I1661th facilities ; ger.prai hospita s, 'speci4liked hoepitols" " " jA%" note Group U ; ; : ; peychlatric lwspitals, eare»tnity mental health � 10.00 . ,...«.� ';^ +w • • _� �_ 1 ^_ 1 eertora, public health canters, veterans ___. AL- •mil f': ". �' honl itals, diarynoscic" irid troaUnents aen£sis;' :clinlee, facilities for Aentally retarded, r i :.:.. . ! .:.. ' ; .::. ; " " �} ice:' i '_' ' ' ' ' _ r • medical and dental office buildings + r public, private; indusirlal{' 'Coll#go and p� 9,00 .'souses is U'>7sutpsytr buildingt' .._ __... 8.00 IT tensionless .00 .=�1:.:: . ; ! r «:...� . ..�.. .+�.,..,� .�L ..�i...�",.'�......1 , :...i i.:,�� a,• . , ',r.,�.1 �.:.`•.�..•..��f - - - L.J». ..a L.•�... ' .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 . 2.0 2.2 2. CONSTRUCTION COST IN '"LLIONS OF DOLLARS �o .f� J/ f 0 n , t ti i r i rw,a-a---.rs .__ •_ -_.� �r.--. -- - f __ __— tf. r.—„ii fsi�-tps�-sans _ KENAI COMMUNITY CENTER DESIGN CONSORTIWM carmen vincent gintoli, architect In association with Willian A. Kluge & Associates Malone Surveying McLane & Associates Wince-Corthell-Bryson John McMillan Towne, Richards & Choudiere Lino J. Agosti & Associate Wm. J. Nelson & Associates Jan K, Hansen, P.E. Dean J. Athay a Associates Clark -Graves July 12. 1984 Surveyor Soils Investigation Civil Rendering Acoustical Food Service Structural Mechanical Electrical Cost Estimator a carmen vincent gintoll, architect box 4625 professional building suite 110 Kenai, aiaska 99611 907 283.7732 July 12, 1984 City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 i Attention: Keith Kornelis Re: Kenai Community Center Architectural and Engineering Fee Proposal Dear Keith: Attached please find the Fee Schedule for individual firms comprising the "Kenai Community Center Design Consortium". Our firm will work in associ- ation with the firm of William A. Kluge and Associates in providing the �,- architectural services. The engineering work will be provided by the firms listed. We, however will be responsible for the coordination of all work. y For simplicity the group has ageed that the firm of Carmen Vincent Gintoli, Architect will contract with the City of Kenai. Each member firm will bill us for work performed; we in turn will submit one monthly billing (or an - - agreed upon schedule for payments). Our billing will include copies of invoices from each member firms so that you have an accurate record of amounts billed towards the maximum fees. Our firm will provide the necessary Professional Liability Insurance and other insurances required by the City in its standard architectural contract. Assuming we use the same contract form as used on the Library and Police Station projects, all of that insurance documentation is in place. f The total design fee shall not exceed one -hundred -ninety -thousand -eight -hundred - and ninety($190,890.00) dollars in accordance with the attached fee schedule. Inspection services shalt be performed in accordance with the hourly rates 1, submitted by each firm and shall not exceed the total of $48,000.00. The total fee represents approximately 7.5% of the project cost. We feel I that this is an extremely reasonable fee as most projects of this scope are ii considered "monumental" with fees between 10% and 12%. The total fee offered J becomes more reasonable because it is an up -set limit rather than a lump sum. 1 We are confident that we will not reach the total fee submitted. Kenai Community Center �'- fee Proposal Page Z I It is our intention to complete contract documents by December 1, 1984. This will allow the City officials every advantage in approaching the Legislature for funding in December and early January. The work shall be performed in accordance with the attached Scope of 1 Services. We trust this Information will suffice, and on behalf of all memeber firms wish to express to you and the City Council our gratitude for your continued support. i Sincerely, carmen vincent gintoli, architect Carmen V. Gintoli CVG/jk ; o 1 f i M I io • ' j i - 1 i I I , I v I i '� s 1' . .__..i.-:�i.'_ _.-. "-_ ..-. •v'sT'G ,." r� 'FAY'.. .-i �... �.-::�>.�r...�s . .. .�..-. .. KENAI COMMUNITY CENTER DESIGN CONSORTIUM I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Design Phase We propose to perform the following services: . Using approved Schematic Designs, provide complete Design Development documents. This phase will fix and describe materials, structural, mechanical, electrical, food service and acoustical systems. The Team will work with the Community Center Committee in determining architectural finishes. • Upon completion, present the Documents to the City Administration, Community Center Committee and City Council for approvals. . Provide full color rendering of the project. • Proceed with Contract Documents, with periodical reviews with City Administration and Community Center Committees. . Upon completion of Contract Documents, make final presentation as required. • Include all reimbursables, with the exception of Contract Documents for legislators and bidding printing. . Obtain necessary approvals of all state and local agencies. B. Bidding Phase (included in Contract Administration fee). Upon notice to proceed, we will provide the following services: • Provide for the printing of Contract Documents . Prepare any addenda which may be required. . Assist the City in Bid Tabulations. . Review bids and make recommendations regarding successful bidders. C. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (Inspection) During this phase, we will perform the following services: . Observe and report construction progress and deviations from the Contract Documents. . Review and approve submittals and shop drawings. . Review and approve substantial completion requests. • Review and approve application and certification for payments. . Provide "punch list". . Verify punch list completion and report same. . Approve occupancy certification. I- _ b � "I ra KENAI COMMUNITY CENTER DESIGN CONSORTIUM II. FEE SCHEDULE SURVEYING Malone Surveying $5,610.00 . SOILS INVESTIGATION McLane & Associates $10,800.00 . CIVIL ENGINEERING Wince-Corthell-Bryson $5,600.00 G . ARCHITECTURAL including Landscaping & Interior Design Gintoli in association with Kluge $90,000.00 RENDERING °"- - John McMillan $1,200.00 ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT Towne, Richards & Chaudiere $6,760.00 FOOD SERVICE Lino Agosti & Associate $6,000.00 ' STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Wm. J. Nelson & Associates $36,000.00 1 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Jan K. Hansen, P.E. $180480.00 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Dean J. Athay & Associates $9,100.00 COST CONSULTANT Clark -Graves $2,350.00 TOTAL DESIGN FEE $190,890.00 (Reimbursables will be billed in their exact amounts plus 10%) i i � III. BILLING RATES . i Surveying: o]ofaTne Surveying Two Member Crew $90.00/hr. Three Member Crew $130.00/hr. Additional Personnel $40.00/hr. Office: Drafting $25.00/hr. ��. Computation, Design $35.00/hr. Professional Time $55.00/hr. Reimbursable ■ Cost plus 10% Soils Investigation: c ane and Associates Professional Engineer $60.00/hr. Civil Engineer $50.00/hr. Soil Technician $45.00/hr. Drafter $32.00/hr. Drilling $13.50/L.F. • Civil En ineerin : Wince-Corthel -Bryson Consulting Engineers Schedules of Rates and Charges for Engineering Services Effective January 1, 1984 Engineering Schedule A. Schedule B. Engineer I $55.50 $68.00 Engineer III $47.00 $49.50 Engineer IV $38.50 $40.50 Technician $40.50 $41.50 Draftsman $29.00 $30.50 Typist (Reports and Specifications only) $30.00 $31.00 r Architectural: Carmen Vincent Gintoll, Architect -;• William A. Kluge & Associates Principals $60.00/hr. Project Architect $45.00/hr. Senior Drafter $40.00/hr. Jr. Drafter $24.00/hr. Secretarial $15.00/hr. =` Rendering: ZEE McMillan $25.00/hr. ^ JI Food Service Consultant: Lino Agosti & Associate $75.00/hr. e Ri i r-. - Acoustical Consultant: Towne, Richards and Chaudiere, Inc. Principal Engineer Technician Structural: mA�ffeTson & Associates i Principal/Engineer Engineer II Engineer I Construction Inspector Engineering Technician Draftsman Clerical Direct Project Cost ■ Cost + 10% Equipment: Vehicle (First 25 miles included in daily charge) HP 868 Computer System Mechanical: Jan RHansen, P.E. Principal Drafter Secretarial Electrical: Dean & Associates Principal z j Engineer Designer i Drafter Clerical tea Cost Consultant: fi.. Clark -Graves Principal Estimator Assistant $70.00/hr. $60,00/hr. $50.00/hr. S.T. O.T. $65.00/hr. $85.00/hr. $55.00/hr. $63.00/hr. $50.00/hr. $61.50/hr. $50.00/hr. $61.50/hr. $40.00/hr. $49.00/hr. $35.00/hr. $43.00/hr. $25.00/hr. $31.00/hr. $40.00/day plus $.50/mile $15.00 per hour $60.00/hr. $35.00/hr. $25.00/hr. $87.00/hr. $70.00/hr, $60.00/hr. $43.00/hr. $33.00/hr. $55.00/hr. $45.00/hr. $27.00/hr. J 1 Y --"i Iii ..-_IaI carmen vincent gintoli, architect 0ox 4625 professional building suite 110 Kenai. alaska 99611 907 283.7732 July 13, 1984 City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention: Keith Kornelis Re: Kenai Community Center Design Consortium Proposal Dear Keith: Pursuant to our contract negotiations of July 12, 1984 and today we are able to reduce the fee by the following amounts: Soil Investigation: Reduce drilling from 12 holes to six holes. - $3,500.00 Architectural: We will reduce our N.T.E. by 10Z - $9,000.00 Structural: Mr. Nelson will reduce his fee by 10% - $3,600.00 Mechanical: Mr. Hansen will reduce his fee by 10% -$1,840.00 Total Reduction $17,948.00 Revised N.T.E. Design Fee $172,942.00 We hope you will find these reductions acceptable; should you have additional questions, please call me. Sincerely, ;caLen vi/ncent glnt 11, architect Y Carmen V. Gintol CVG/jk copy: Wm. A. Kluge & Associates McLane & Associates Bill Nelson Jan Hansen J M �� . , - t -. 6 7 — i n " -6- ,, , , ' r r " . , , ♦ . . r. , i „ t h I 1 11 _ ml-2satrti �.... — r" , Fa G- 67 Suclquotud bye Adminial,ration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 957-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1904-05 "COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM" FUND 0Y $3,269. WHEREAS, the Stato of Alaska offered the City of Kenai a grant award of $5,222 to cover tho project period January 1, 1984 through Decombor 31, 1904, and WHEREAS, the appropriation in the Special Revenue Fund "Community Service Program" lapood at June 30, 1984, and the grant period continues through December 31, 1904, and WHEREAS, the unencumbered montee at June 30, 1994 of $3,209 together with a General Fund contribution of $60 in oalarios remain to be appropriated, and WHEREAS, proper accounting praeticoo require that all appropriationa of City meniea be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following inereaeos in estimated rovenueo and appropriationo be mados General Fund Incroaao Estimated Revenues Appropriation of Fund 0alance $ 60 Incroaoo Appropriationss Non -Departmental - Tronafero Out $ 60 Community Service Program Inereaao Estimated Rovenuons Tronofer from General Fund $ 60 State Grant 2,949 Accountinq In -Kind 260 Y 1 Incroami Appropriationas -- Salarlvu $2, 605 ESC 167 Workman'a Componontion 237 Prof ©noional Sorvicon 260 $s,YO PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, thin 18th day of July, 1984. TOR-WA-GURER9 MAYOR �r AT1ESTs Firet Readings July 18, 1984 Second Readings July 18, 1984 Effective Dates July 18, 1984 Approved by Finances / i • r 1 i 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 i i •�%er-L. J--zii f_ T,.-. dsi I . :._"_.__1�._•7L�lW�• .. _'�..-_ , �.M_ _ .. .. .. .....,�.., -� a -'-"- — - ._ r•�_ - _ ..T .. r ••rf►�-.= .__ �_-/�Si._ iea. . r __ a-_,.t s 1 Suggeotod by s Adminiatrntlon i CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 958-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE, 1984-05 KENAI SENIOR CITIZENS PROJECT BY $97,594. . i WHEREAS, the State of Alaska offered the City of Kenai A grant of $118,511 and a oupplomentnl grant of $59317 to cover the project period January 1, 1984 through December 31, 1984, and WHEREAS, $118,511 was appropriated in FY 1983-84 and lapaod at June 30, 1984, and the $5,317 has not yet been appropriated, and WHEREAS, the unencumbered monieo st June 30, 1984 of $89,339 together with the City of Kenai's coal' match of $2,938 and the supplemental grant of $5,317 remain to be appropriated, and WHEREAS, proper accounting practices require that all ' appropriations of City monies be made by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increanes in estimated rovenuoo and appropriations be modes ., General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues, Appropriation of Fund Balance $ 2,938 Incrosoe Appropriationos Non-Departmontal - Tranoforo Out $ 2,938 Kenai Senior Citizens I►.creaoo Estimated Rovenueos Transfer from General Fund $ 2,938 USDA 4,246 State Grant 74,015 Rental Senior Center (In -Kind) .,9,450 � Contributions $y7 937 594 J 1 r, �t" rrr► A �i irl'.m �T..i, r���rrn,�—. rr .'--,:;--� « .iwr^.. -, ., vw. ,.. .. ... ..- y-.U.....a ..- ,. -. ..»._ ... ..--:..., .r.iJu.r ....«,-..��-.r�..•.... r-+A�+.....n.ev.,w .,.-.- .. �--itii1S.. w lnrroane Appropriatlonas Acoone Services Sulartos $18,637 Accrued leave 1,750 PERS 2,081 I CSC 917 Workmens Compensation 1,848 Health 2,827 Supplemental Retirement 383 office Supplies 587 Communications 236 Utilities 2,509 Rent (1n-Kind) 4,729 Machinery 6 Equipment 3,291 Congregato Mealss Salnrios $13,513 Accrued leave 1,181 PERS 1,502 ESC 668 I Workmens Compensation 1,215 Health 3,250 Supplemental Retirement 278 Operating Supplies 160036 ..' Repair 6 Maintenance Supplies 478 Small Tools 19612 Communications 250 Utilities 2,510 w Rent (In -Kind) 49729 Machinery 6 Equipment 4000 Home Delivered Moalas Salaries $ 2,534 Accrued leave 221 PERS 282 ESC 169 Workmens Compensation 221 Health 655 Supplemental Retirement 54 Operating Supplies 4,010 Repair 6 Maintenance Supplies 1,666 Machinery 6 Equipment �33665 2 i wr.� f..la.. 4' I r• i : r • � II .—,-- - _- , .�... >• •• . p rr=.r•n•�-r, I , n,.// • - , ... q. �� .rrr -, ,--. �.rr � �. a a, �..•-.as...pe�t,..-...--...•+w.._+ �itr..r..rr.• .....:w:., ;•,I",` PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th dny of July, 1984. WAGONER, MAYORTOM . ATTEST: o. Janet a an, City TreFT First Readings July 18, 1984 --- Second Readings July 18, 1984 Effective Date: July 18, 1984 Approved by Finances -.- ! w 1 1 ' I U i . I / I � i I U• o M1 ' �O I 1 CITY OF KI NAI P.O. BOX $80 • KENAI, ALAIKA • PHONE 213.7836 LEASE APPLICATION Name of Applicant M=C, lr 01 Address Suaineso Name and Address Kenai Poninoula Borough Sales Tax No. (if applicable) State Suaineao Licence No. (if applicable) Telephone Lot Description eclt. Desired Length of Leaoor,�s, Property to be used for Description of Developmento (type, construction, sizo, etc.) Attach development plan to scale (1" a 501), Ohowing all huildingo planned. Time Schedule for Propooed Developments Beginning Date aj i ;rA- J2) Proposed Completion Date t_c) i • i.v ) �/L-%%f2, Estimated Value of Construction �_ z;c otrc I Dates Signed$ Date: y%,�, /��;�_ S igned $ O' 1 CITY OF KENAI y CHECK LIST FOR SITE PLANT ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETL O BEFORE APPLICATION CAN BE ACCEPTED Drawings should be drnwn to scale 111: 50 ft.», and must show layout of the lot applied for and the location of all improve- ments proposed. jDrawings must shows 1. Existing buildings ry 2. Proposod buildings 3. Parking facilities (how many spaces and whore located) 4. Site improvements s. Arens to be cleared and method of dispooal b. Proposed gravel or paved areas Co Landscaping plan (retention of natural vegetation and/or proposed planting areas) 5. Building set backs 6. Drainage plan and method of snow removal r r 7. Circulation plan (all entrances, exits and on -site access) So Location of sign s) - sign permit required 9. Fencing 10. Curb cuts (where applicable) i 11. Building height ;} I 12. Buildings on or near the airport on airport lands must complete FAA Form 7460-1 *This does not have to be drawn by an architect or engineer. el ' a 'y7 A 1 . F 1 IT. Oeacr ipt ion of Property Lot 4. Guuty Subdiviaiun CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE I (To bo completed by the City) 9 Annual rent rat a or cunt 67. of appraiacd value Zoned for Cen.arnl Commorcial Permits require! Building Aseeaoment a None Insurance required $500,000/$1,000,000/$250.000 Conot ruction mush begin by Completion data for major construction / I THIS APPLICATION WILL BE MADE A PART Of THE LEASE Planning C miso Approvals By$ Rate of Approval ha r. City Council Approvals By$ , City Clark Date of Approval 4 r 1 ^mJ �'J i' CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALOO KENAI, ALASKA 69611 TELEPHONE 203•7535 July 3, 1984 Mr. Patrick J. Doyle Route 1, Box 1225 Kenai, Alaska 99611 REs Lease Application - Lot 4, Block 1 Gusty Subdivision Dear Mr. Doyles The Kenai Advisory Planning 6 Zoning Commission reviewed your lease application at their recent meeting on June 27, 1984. Please be advised that the Commission recommended approval of the application, subject to the submission of the following informations (1) Site Plan - A more detailed site plan is needed so an accurate record can be filed with the lease agreement. The plan must be drawn to scale, indicate any parking spaces to be provided on the lot and address surface drainage and snow storage or removal plans. (2) FAA approval in accordance with required Form 7460-1 (attached). Upon receipt of this information, I will schedule your application for final consideration by Council. If this material is submitted prior to July 13, the lease request will be included on the Council agenda of July 18. An appraisal of the proporty has been ordered and a copy will be sent to you upon receipt by the City. I anticipate that a Issue agreement can be finalized by the end of the month if the necessary information is received and approved by Council. I can be contacted if you have any further questions regarding your application. Sincerely, Je 415it L ner JL/dg Attachment J ' LO+ 'Y, Guafy S .r .LAG :%ii�JJtostaC7lv�alvl�inL JUN 1934 Tnraaumn 007 • 0193•71 e19 t• CIif Win, CITY Cr May 31, 1984 .r. Mr. Charles A. Brown Finance Director 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Ras Your letter of May 24, 1984 Assessment Districts for Princess and Magic Streets Dear Mr. Browns This matter has gotten completely blown out of proportion. The people that live over in the area of Princess and Magic Streets were under, the impression that they were going to have considerable street improvements without putting underground water and sewer in first. In other words getting the cart before the horse. They went to the City Council with their request x' that the City put in sewer and water before doing anything else. During the course of the meeting one of the City Councilmen inquired if the people in the area would be willing to pick up part of the cost i.e., 20 or 25%. Pursuant to that request and inquiry, the parties of the original petition were recontacted, four were out of town and one refused to pay anything and the others agreed to pay a portion of the costs of the installation. Now I find the whole thing; has gotten completely out of context to the extent that it iu ridiculous. I am going into the second paragraph on the second page, "in general, the City has requested that the petitionorn waive the 25% limitation on assessments" that is not true. Councilman Wise inquired whether these people would be willing to pick of 25% of the cost of water and sewer. }y They agreed, they waived nothing. 9 Boned upon your letter of May 24, Councilman Wises' inquiry i was an exercise in futility and a jousting at windmills for m-y clients to nnsewe!r they question. It apparently is; not possible to -= do this, I am going to advise my clients that they should seek to get these improvements ut in at no cost to them on the, basis --, of the fact than the City gas and in the past and regularly put in streets, sidewalks, gutters, sewer., water, and storm sewers without any asses+ntnNntn whatsoever to the adjacent landowners and i for them not to do Fo would be a discriminntory act on behalf of r the City. If they decide they wrsnt to pursue that matter it J 1 1 I '-j 1" J i t r r: f r would be strictly tip to them, but at no time have any of these people considered 1007 .,tccess. o Sincere '.ly, . , 1I .its• / •. lli%v(.Zj4-- EAWARA L. GARNETT EEG/lg i r � > � n r 1 ♦ l I i 1 I r-, I CITY OF KENAI .,ad CalaiW 4 r4ia,.i"„ 2:0 FIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 283.7535 May 24, 1984 Edward L. Garnett P. 0. Box 3331 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mr. Garnett: Your letter of May 17, 1984 to Bill Brighton regarding a possible assessment district on Princess and Magic streets has been referred to me for a response. If an assessment district is to be formed, the City and the petitioners will have to comply with Title 16 of the Kenai Municipal Code. A portion of Title 16 which you might be concerned with at the moment is reproduced below: 16.05.020 Row Improvement Proposal Initiated: (a) An improvement proposal may be initiated by: 1) Petition to the City Council filed with the City Clerk, by the owners of property in the proposed improvement district, or, 2) Resolution of the City Council. (Ord. 791) i • 16.05.030 Requi.r-ments of petition: The petition shall include a description of the proposed improvements. Unlesn all benefited property owners' signatures are required by virtue of KMC 16.05.010, the petition shall be signed by the owners of 50% or more of the properties which will be benefited by the proposed improvement. No property owner may withdraw his approval of the proposed improvement for a period of six months after the petition has been filed, unless authorized by Council. (Ords. 791, 868) What the City would need is a petition completed which fully describes the improvements requested and the physical area of the improvements. It should specifically identify the improvements, such as water, newer, gravel road upgrade, storm drainage, etc. It should also be very specific as to the beginning and ending points of which streets are to be included in the district. i I • C � • 7' i I I 1 I I 1 1 I The petition must have the following data for each property along the proposed assessment district: A. The legal description B. The owner of record C. The signature of the owner of record (for those in favor of the assessment district). In general, the City has requested that the petitioners waive the 25% limitation on assessments (in this case, the 25% is applied against the value of the property), and agree to accept 100% of the cost of the improvements. You may wish to include this phrase in the ' petition. It should be noted that the owners of all the properties in the proposed district must agree to this if the 25% rule is to be waived. I realize that Councilman Wise asked at the 5-2-84 council meeting if { the residents would consider a 20% assessment. That question should i certainly not be viewed as a determination by the City Council or by the Administration. However, KHC 16.05.010 does appear to make that a possibility. If this is what is desired, then that should also become a part of the petition.i i w Sincerely, Charles A. Brown Finance Director • CAB: jb i CC: Bill Brighton Tim Rogers �Q A . 0 �C: ✓JaT .iiiiii � .} " c uu4 XII a.r 996'1/ ,, , TLLVPH0.'ce907-283-7189 May 17, 1984 Mr. Bill Brighton City Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai. AK 99611 Re: Petition / Property Owners for Sewer and Water etc., for Princess AND Magie Streets Dear Bill: Pursuant to the request from Mr. Wise, one of the councillben, all of the persons on the petition filed with the City at the May 2 meeting, have been contacted except four. All of them except one agreed that they would accept assessments of 20%. We had one person say he did not want to pay any assessments at all. For all practical purposes, twenty six of the property owners who signed the petition indicated that they would be willing to pay a 20% assessment if necesarry to get the sewer and water put in. ELG/lg Sincerely, RDWA D L. GARINE1T #-ili::-..,.� c..l..ndr.,. s El KE%AI CITY Cllll'.C;L, REGULAR KEII•:G, MI•.IJIL5 MAY 2. IIIH+. 7:00 11!1. KENAl CIFY A0111%1;T11-MO`1 I1l1ILDI':G MA111R 1011 4A(;U%El1 1411:5IDPIG PLf..DI:C Of ALLf.GIA%CE A. Rt1LL CALL Present Ray rioallo)s, Chr its Honfor, John Wise, Tom Na-joner, Tom Acker ly, Sally SaaIte. Jess Hall Abnents None A-1 Agenda Approval a. Mayor wagoner asked that item B-3 be added, Alex Shndura, Civic Leaque Dormant Arcount b. Mayor Wagoner asked that stem G-19 be changed to item B-4 C. Mayor wagoner nand that Administration asked that stem C-1 he postponed. He would like to discuss it. d. Mayor Wagoner said that Administration asked that Item C-3 be tabled e. Mayor Wagoner asked that item G-6 be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda. f. Mayor Wagoner noted an amendment to item G•11 was distributed this date. Council approved the agenda as changed. A-2 Consent Agenda MOTIONS Councilman Hassles moved, seconded by Councilwoman $$Ilse, to approve the agenda as amended, with the exception of item G-6, Ord. 932-B4. Councilman Wise asked that item G-2. Requisitions Etceeding $1,000 - tho survey for Section 36 be discussed. Councilwoman Bailso asked that item G-4, Ord. 930-84, be diucussed. A 2nd is not required for Consent Agenda changes. Consent Agenda was approved as amended by unanimous consent. S. PERSONS PRESENT SCULUULEO TO BE HEARD 1 Ed Garnett, Atty. - Water S Sewer, Linwood Ett. Project tar. Garnett taut hi. had been asked to make a presentation reg.trduig the residents of Princes. Lane and area. There was a proposal for writer 4 sewer to Linwnod Est. There was ! note r-11,jenf who) nb ject rd. Council decided not to take i artion. 11r; o)ryrd Council to put water d sewer in those, st rests to the coning year. Ihrrr• is a high ground water 0y•11 ". Itoe area is growing. the hlsil.lintIs are re-stdenttnl. He hat a p-;tittool of 11 names of owners that i want w.ilrr 11 3ewef. Water its neceslary, Sewer its important t al,,n brcau.e of the daotg.•r of cant amsnated w.ster. There is water H ft. to its ft. down. If this is not the majority. it is a 1.1rnr p••tr-;rot tqe of the landawnwrz, CounetIman itce + a-:s.ed if trot t••stdrnl i would eunstd-r a aloe-s•tment 1t 41•: rfc! ril w•1 .-r N war. f.ernett replied tie wuu J 1 d1..C.f:.: :ht•i +i:•, list, rr•.64-01-1 J.1.1 r.•pOr! to Cit.-1anJger f slrtgr.l•sn. • noted the- f.tt%, has po.sred mnCn atOnev tnt3 Ifni to de.-!,-i .-teso nrn.•r af.•.ri as.w been sgn.irrd. ltavot • '.�lyor•-r nqi wit t:•r r.Jrrrn: •ffq; :t I.;.!n.1t i••er..�• if tn.?j • i)-'i,1 i•! .,••• •+7vt .1n illt fir! t'1e• shou!S "love ` f:1St . It w,: •s.iv •• iJ :. •irl4v rd tar •i -e lr. • i �J i' CITY OF KENAI " 0d Capd4l of 4" 210 RIDALGO KENAI, ALASKA enil TELEPHONE M - 7M July 13, 1984 MEMORANDUM ; TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager FROMs Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director REs Dust Control Since ADEC has essentially disallowed the use of waste oil, I ' have looked at two other solutions for dust control: 1. CSSI which is a liquid asphalt. The State has used this on Cohoe and other places. It does not seem very effective and would require multi -applications. It is harder to apply ; than the other solution. Should be heated, hard on pumps ti and messy. We'd have to rent distributor truck. Cost Estimates $1,100/mile x 15 miles = $16,50C 2. Raybinder (Sodium Lignosulfonate). Soldotna is using and recommends its use. Designed for dust control and road stabilization. Uses wood sugars and lignen polymer to glue or bond soil particles together. Not harmful to cars or plants. Easy to apply. Need mixing tank and water truck. Not as messy. Have to rent truck (Leo Anderson). Second application may be necessary but not as many times as CSSI. Cost Estimate: $1,200/mile x 15 miles = $18,000. Public Works Recommendation: Oust control is an aesthetics problem. If the Council feels strongly enough to appropriate say $20,000 for dust control, I would recommend we go ahead and try using the Raybinder. KK/dg -J /' ilr.J W..�. • _ _•i•�l .r Iri.. wit`. r _' I r w .vgffgbb� b ARM & ENGINEERS, INC. S \%W PARKWOOD PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, SOLDOTNA, ALASKA July 16, 1984 N1 The Honorable Tom Wagoner Mayor, City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Tom, The purpose of my letter today is to verify our recent conversation wherein S b S Engineers, Inc. proposed to assist the City in identifying federal grant programs that would enable the City of Kenai to proceed with Its plans to construct a floatplane facility on the grounds of the Kenai City Airport. Our search would include a review of all federal domestic grant pro- grams. The search would be manual and computer assisted. S b S Enginesers will make every endeavor to find construction grant monies for the City; however you must understand that we cannot guarantee that this type of grant program can be found for the City of Kenai. If the City accepts our offer we would ask payment upon billing for the cost of the computer -assisted portion of the search. We expect this cost would be nominal - $100-$200 at most. Other current expenses would be in- cluded in the general engineering fee for the floatplane facility. If our proposal is acceptable to the Mayor and Council, we would ask the City to enter into an Agreement for Engineering Services with S E S Engineers to provide the general engineering services, the construction supervision and the construction staking services for the floatplane facility. The Agree- ment would be developed along the lines of a federal Farmers Home Adminis- tration contract, which would outline in complete detail the Scope of Services and the Fee Schedule therefor. The Scope of Services and the Fee Schedule would be determined by negotiation between the Owner and the Engineer. The Fee Schedule would conform to and would be derived from guidelines provided by the American Society of Civil Engineers, a national organization to enhance ethical standards and professional development. ANCHORAGE (W 34%%1 SOLDOTNA W 2624M WASILLA (907) 3763770 -7. 1 ., I) The Honorable Tom Wagoner July 16,, 1984 Page 2 In conclusion, I wish to thank you for this opportunity to be of service to the City. Yours truly, S ones, ENGINEERS, INC. la oP.E. n ge r Kenai Peninsula Office CITY OF KENAI %tOd Oapdal of 4444a" M FIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 80611 TELEPHONE 283.7535 July 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TOs Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager ;Kenai City Council FROMs eff Labahn, Land Manager REs Lease Assignment - Tommy S. Partee to Edwin R. Lowry Tract A, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision The City of Kenai has received a petition to assign a 50% undivided interest in the referenced lease to Edwin R. Lowry. As a result, Tommy S. Partee and Edwin R. Lowry would become co -lessees of Tract A, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision. Per KMC 21.15.060, no assignment of lease may occur without the approval of Council. I checked with the Finance Department this date and found that the lessee is delinquent for the past two months rent, not included the current month. It has been the policy of Council to require all delinquencies to be psid as a condition of assignment. JL/dg • / g 154 -. . �e 1, 1� , 7 . ,p 1 �c LEASE ASSIGNMENT CITY OF KENAI ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT For valuable consideration hereby recelpted Tommy S. Partee r does hereby assign and demise the Lease dated March 30, i 1984 of Tract A Sprucewood Glen Subdivision to Edwin R. I.owry 10819 Spur Hwy Suite 125, Kenai, AK 99611 as to a fifty percent (507*) undivided interest in said lease. -- The City of Kenai hereby acknowledged assignment of the Interest in the lease to Edwin R. Lowry. ommy Partee William J. Brighton City Manager - Kenai := •b STATE OF ALASKA ) F` � ) ss : THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) The foregoint instrument was acknowledged before ' me this 3rd day of July by Tommy S. Partee. Notary Public for Alaska My commission expires: i + 7 STATE OF ALASKA ) � " ' ) ss: THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before r j! me this 3rd day of July by William J. Brighton. Notary Public for Alaska My commission expires: /f r4 19 it SIFTIOPS L*49 IAMw f TRACT F TRACT -A ',;\248 AC, 3.030 AC, ram. I 101% 51114 9 10 IV 00tip` tq *?— C 41k. 40 e)f 4tA.;XA 59L DE P'l Atli. % TRACT-9 5 1606A� 00 V; P1IW TRACT�C NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1666 Ac , 0 ::r : �': I \ FOR: Edwin R. Lowry bi Subtsfibod Gold sworn Wait in# thispp < 4p !lo —L't— day Of V. MY Commission *504011 IL Q Notary pubve for 'no UTUTV V. LINE TABLE L ItiF is too 03 V4 93 0 r, 0010,00*10 93IS2 69.69 �..-a'.i �'r:T`-�i.«.... F.j 1.. Fs:G'. I�i •i ... . y:. -� .... a.... ..., . .� e�... ..�.. .•.r,. � � ,. .. .w.. .. .,,_.... ,.. err. ..u-.u..-___ _ rrr..w�---r--r-._-�.>a1.. _. _._.'_. —..IP H- p carmen vincent gintoll. architect 130 trading bay road, suite 330 kenai, alaska 99611 907 283.7732 July 18, 1984 City of Kenai Honorable Mayor, Council Members and City Manager KENAI COMMUNITY LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT The following is a projected cost breakdown for the proposed 5100 square foot addition with a "daylight basement" of the same area. This concept was approved by the Library Commission at its joint meeting with the Library Board at the Commission's regular meeting, Tuesday July 17, 1984. The Cost of the 5100 S.F. ground level addition is estimated by our Cost Consultant, Clark -Graves to be $439,038.00 or $86.09 per square foot, which includes a 10% contingency. In addition, the additive alternates are estimated as follows: Alternate No. 1 Arctic Entry $13,866.96 Alternate No. 2 Re -roof and Reinsulate $48,678.45 The cost of the basement is estimated to be $239,700.00,plus the cost of the additional toilets, mechancial equipment and an elevator, which are required and estimated as follows: Toilets $15,600.00 Roof top mechanical unit $11,000.00 Elevator $55,000.00 The total for the basement is estimated to be $321,300.00, plus a 10% contingency brings the total to $353,430.00. The funding available is as follows: State Grant $700,000.00 Federal Grant $168,000.00 $868,000.00 s E i I I I KENAI COMMUNITY LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT July 18, 1984 Dog.. o 0 .,� .. The total project cost is estimated to be: New construction of 2 story addition is $792,466.00 (which includes the 10% contingency) Furnishings $75,000.00 gb�$857,468.00 Additive Alternates $62,545.00 010 Total Estimated Cost $,013.00 The reason for the additional funds is attributed to an excellent biddingg climate so far this year, which caused the estimate to be much less than the $150/S.F. figure used last year. The work we have done to date on the grade level addition is 98% complete. The drawings are 100% complete; only the specifications need to be typed. By adding the "daylight basement" those drawings will have little salvage value. Only the site plan and a few of the details are usable. Our fee to re -draw the project is estimated to be $35,000.00. In effect we have to start over again. We will offer that fee as an up -set limit, billing the City only for time put into the project. Every effort will be made to re -use portions of the work performed. If we are directed to proceed we will make every effort to complete the work in 30 days so that the project can be bid during this construction season, and can be "closed in" prior to the onset of winter. We trust this information will suffice. Respectfully submitted, ca vincent gint 1i, architect - ...r Carmen V. Gintoli CVG/jk 1 i J' MJ /, /)V(-o #/ CITY OF KENAI -0d igapiW 4 4"0-0' 210 FIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 TELEPHONE 283.7535 July 11, 1984 Mr. William K. Smith, Chairman Alcohol Beverage Control Board Department of Revenue State of Alaska 201 E. 9th Avenue Anchorage, Ak 99501 Res Applications for Beverage Dispensary ,. Liquor Licenses under AS O4.11.400(g) (Tourism) and AS O4.11.100 (Restaurant or Eating Place) Dear Sirs In response to your communication of June 15, 1984, in which you solicited comment by local governing bodies regarding your preliminary prospective guidelines for issuance of beverage dispensary liquor licenses, the Kenai City Council has considered the ramifications of your proposal and wishes to register its concerns. Your proposed criteria for a tourism beverage dispensary liquor license under AS O4.11.400(g) is not felt to be appropriate for a community such as Kenai. Under the population category you have listed as 50001 - 15,000, one would need 25 rooms and a restaurant capacity of 50 to 59 persons seating capacity in order to obtain a license unless they could qualify under some as yet undefined criteria which established them outside the City's centers or immediate adjacent areas. The Council feels that an area such as ours would be better served by criteria requiring substantially �.; fewer rooms and restaurant seating capacity. Allowing smaller facilities the availability of beverage dispensary licenses is �..,. more suitable for an area such as ours that encompasses a relatively large sparsely populated geographic area, since it may serve both the travelling public as well as prospective small entrepreneurs desiring to build restaurant/motel facilities in our areas. It would also help in relieving congestion on our - limited number of roads and lessen the numbers of those driving after drinking, since under a situation where bed, booze, and board are in one location there is less need or risk of vehicular travel after consuming alcoholic beverages. -- J Im , y� .nr.��rrrrr July 11, 1984 Mr. William K. Smith Page 2 Thank you in advance for your consideration of the Kenai City Council's comments and desires in this matter. Sincerely, _-_-- j Tim fwgers City Attorney r TR/md I I l I �I I f . N'Fo - a rkzn4a1 do nzinunity -zit 2at1J A PUBLIC LIBRARY IN 6&RVICE UINC6 1949 BOX 157 KENAI. ALASKA 99611 v REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1984 Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books Fiction 1481 856 1519 Non -Fiction '1671 259 411 Total Book Circulation..6197 Films, Phonodiscs, Pamphlets, Periodicals..432 Total Circulation..6629 Additions Adult Juvenile , Easy Books AV Total Gifts 60 3 12 5 80 Purchases 82 21 66 .13 182 Total Additions..262 Remedial and Re -worked Books Adult Juvenile Easy Books 2 14 2 Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Received Books 59 50 4o AV 45 37 41 Interlibrary Loans by our Library Books 26 AV 2 i r Volunteers i Number 40 j Total Hours 604 s 3 1 rl: 4 Income Fines and Sales Books 299.80 ,Q Lost or Damaged Books 22.65 - Xerox 245.50 -1 Total Income for June, 1984..$567.95. r r v Xznai Community Zd Taz y A PUBLIC LIBRARY IN BERVICB BINC6 1949 BOX 157 I KENAI. ALASKA 99611 III I y 1 Library Cards Issued in June, 1984 I Kenai 365 Anchorage 4 Clam Gulch 2 Kasilof 8 Nikishka 30 Ninilchik 2 Soldotna 63 Sterling 9 483 ` 1 1 Edi i a =n1�P-O -�3 A LASKI\ 01 C) N Ali Volume 8. No. 3 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 67 one 19U Smoking prohibited by law: a sign of the times Beginning July 17, 1984, it will be illegal to smoke in taxicabs and other public transportation vehicles. If you are a smoker and you work in a state building, you may not be able to smoke at your desk. And don't light up In restaurants that seat more than 50 customers, grocery stores or at public meetings except In specially designated smoking areas. You could be fined up to $50. This may be disconcerting news for smokers, but nonsmokers hailed the signing of House Bill 84 by Governor Sheffield on April 18. As the hazards of smoking became evident to both smokers and nonsmokers, the rights of nonsmokers took precedence in the Legislature when representatives adopted the new law. In 1975, the Legislature prohibited smoking in most public places. House Bill 84 is more restrictive. In justifying the bill, the 1984 Legislature found that (1) second-hand smoke is a sig. nificant health hazard, (2) employees have the right to a smoke -free envir. onment, and (3) smoking results in increased costs to employers and to the public. Costs increase because of more frequent absenteeism by smok. ers and higher costs for health, fire and life insurance, and workers com- pensation. In state offices and restaurants, the -person in charge' of the premises may designate a smoking area. In the private sector, anyone who con- trols a place of employment may post a sign stating that smoking is prohibited. Proprietors of establishments where smoking is prohibited by law must display appropriate signs or be fined $300 for each day they fail to post such signs. If persons wish to furnish their own signs, they may do so. Signs must be at least 18 inches wide by 6 inches high with lettering 1.25 inches that reads, "Smoking Prohibited By Law - Maximum Fine 850." The international symbol for no smoking must also be included. When the new law goes into effect on July 17. the Department of Envi- ronmental Conservation will be the chief enforcement agency and will in- form the public of the new require. ments. DEC will furnish "Smoking Prohibited" as well as "Designated Smoking Area' signs to those who request them. K9 INFO r ' LAWS OF ALASKA 1984 seaee Choose Ne. b - SCS CSH9 86(rin) an S f1 r AN ACT Relating to smoking in public places end vehicles. • r u IT ENACTED tar THE {EONIJ4UU22 Of U4 STATE OF ALASEAs ,rr y .:, w••. '. THE ACT TOLLOHB ON PACE 1. LINE 9 j 17MOILIND NMpIAL INDICATE$ TOR I MT IS KING AWID TO M LAN NO MURERD IAMIAL IN WITAL LLTTM INDICATES MMIONS FAA M LANI W tMLT WW TINT to FAMAIAL 19"AL90 AND U-0014M If IOtM1r19) IN M 1MtIMUMM :. •} i LM OF EACH SILL SECTION. . 1, I r I r ,l f.: Approved by the Covernor: April 13. 1"4 .w Actual Ettesttve Date: July 17. 1904 i .1 A Chapter 34 t political subdivision of the state, including on office. library, f museum. theater, concert bell, convention hall. gymnasium, swimming •s pool, or other place of sntertsinment•or recreation$ • (41 a public or private school, pre-eebool, or day care t.*tlity$ e (S) a courtroom or jury deliberation roemt r (6) 8 room. chamber. or other place under the control of e the state or a political subdivision of the state while a public • meeting or public assembly Is in Progresso a (7) a patients- or visitors, waiting room or restroon of a It public or private laboratory or office associated with dental care. a health tare, or the healing arts, and a vetting soon. restroon, lobby. tr or hallway of a public or private hospital, nursing hone, rest home, fe or other health care institution or facility$ tf (g) a food service establishment that has a $*sting copes- ~ ity of at least SO Persons$ tt (9) a grocery store or other @tort maintained primarily for ne the retail sal* of food product*$ and fs (10) a place of employment in which the owner, manager. so proprietor, or other person who has control of the premises posts a Is sign stating that wanking is prohibited by low. a gee. 3. Ag 10.35.310 is repealed and reenacted to resdt n 1 gee. 18.33.310, EXEMPTION$. The prohibition set out in A8 1O.- $5.300 does not apply to „ (1) • portion of a place or vehicle that is designated as s smoking section under AS 18.35.320$ it (2) a liswuaitu for hire or taxicab, it tAe driver consents >r and the driver aseactalna that all passengers consent to smoking in the vehicles sts cum 94(rin) as S �2• I I I " V • . " J i 1 i NOTICE PLEASE DISREGARD PREVIOUS IMAGE. DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REFILMED ON FOLLOWING FRAME. a 1� a F. 3 . i r �r ,L Chapter 34 4 • • AN ACT t plating to smoking in public places and vehicles. • • section 1. yINDINOs. no legialsturs finds thats (1) nuwerous studies tuve shorn second -bond •mob to be a sit n niflesnt health hosords It (2) recent tm9t dea!$t"s T•COgnise on ~Sing right Of em is ploye•s to York In a awoke -free envirormati and is (1) smoking results in Increased Costs to employers and th, is public in the faro of mote frequent obsenteelew by employee$ wigs •woke 01' i• higher costs for health Insurance. firs insurance. life insurance. am i it workers' eompan•stlon. is • log. 2. As 10.35.300 to repeated and reenacted to reads i$ see. 1g.33.300. SMtNO IN CERTAIN VEHICLES AND II110001< FIAM fo "MIfITED. smoking in any foes to a nuissnts amd a publib bealel ti hammed and is prohibited In the following vehicles and indoor place$ It swept as othetviss provided by this tbapt*rt ss (1) a vehicle of public transportatitlm and a waiting o' t+ boarding •rem for a vehicle of public transportation. Including a lows >f ferry vessel. train, limousine for hire. teeiteb. or scheduled intre. l ( >a state afseraft flight when consistent with federal laws „ 421 an elevators „ (3) • plate of employment. a building or other ettvttvrs or a portion of them. coned. legged. of Operated by the state or s .l. sCs CEND 841rin/ an s i lo 3 Chapter A • s political subdivision of the state, including an office, library, museum. theater, concert hell, convention hall, gymassium, swimming ,s pool, or other place of entertainment or recreation$ • 441 a public of private school, pre-school, or day care laeslicy$ s (S) a courtroom or jury deliberation rooms r iN a room. chamber, or other place under the control of a the state or a political subdivision of the state while a public s meeting or public aseembly is in progreass N (7) a patients, or visitors, waiting room or restroem of a t; public of private laboratory or office associated with donut cars. " Mslth care, or tho heeling arts, and a waiting room. restroom, lobby. is or hallway of a public or private hospital, nursing home, rest borne, 7r or other health care institution or facility$ to Of s food service establishment that Ms a seating capso- N icy of st least SO persons$ ;r i9f a grocery store or other store maintained primarily for sa the retail sale of food products; and to 410) a plats of employment In which the owner, manages. to proprietor, or other person who has control of the pssmises poste s to sips stating that smoking is prohibited by low, vs a gee. $. As 16.35.310 is repealed and reeaseted to sesd; i see. 18.35.310, LZIMIGM. SM prohibition set out in As St.- 15.300 dooa not apply to il) a portion of a place or vehicle that is designated as s smoking section under As 16,35.3200 r iff a limousine for hire or taxicab, if the driver consents and the driver ascertains that all passengers consent to smoking in the vehicles uL ca s 94trin) as s -!- I - i .17, . Chapter 36 t (3) #making by performers on the state as part of a those. Vital or ontortaintent production. ( • • tee. 4. As is.35.320 Is repealed and reenacted to roods a sac. 15.35.320. DLSICNATIOU O1► OMING IMIONS. (a) A person In charge of an Indoor place or vehicle of public transportation • described in As 11.35.300 may designate portions of the plea* or vabi• r el* as smoking $actions. For purposes of this section. "vehicle of • public transportation" does not include a taxicab or limousin# for • hire, and "indoor place" does .tot include an elevator. 0 . (b) So person who choirs the Rules Cowitt** in a mass of the tt leglalsturo to responsible for the designation of smoking sections q und*V this $*scion in the Ieglalstive offices, committee seam@, and is other places under the control of that hones. The authority to desig. N nate a mmoking section my not be used to impede eke work of a confer - ants, cowittes. N (a$ A person tdm designate$ a smoking section under this #@scion tr thall make reasonable accommodations for the needs of the owhors and N ttoftew tore who use the place or vehicle. » (d) Notwithetsnding any other provision in this eh#/ter, • m amoking section my not be designated under this section for students „ 00 the grounds of or in an olemsatery or secondary school, indoors or outdows. Is Soo. S. As 19.35.330 is repealed and roonectod to roads See. 18.35.330. DISPIAT Of SNORING AND NO SWRIPC MCNs. (a) A % person to efiargo of a plate or vehicle described in AS 38,35.300. Is except a iimon#ine for hire or esxlcab, sholl conspleuonsiy display in the place or vehicle a sign that reads "$•eking Prohibited by Low - „ Nsxi*um Pine $50" and that Ineludos the International symbol for no YJ masking. •3• SCS CSN5 si(Pin) on s .J w /` as $ I • ' Chapter 14 s (b) 1n a place or vehicle in which • amokisg section hew been r destgnscad under AS 18.35,320, the person in ehasg* of the piece or s vehicle shall conspicuously display signs that specify the portions of a the place or vehie)e in which smoking If Shoved by lev end in Which s smoking is prohibited by lay. s te) A sign required by this section must be at least IS inches r vide and aim inches high, With lettering at lest 1.25 inches high, w , (d) The department shall furnish signs required under this # section to a person who requests them with the intention of displaying a than. 1/ Sao- 6. AS IS.35.340 is repesled and reenacted to read$ it See. IS.35.340, CIVIL C01F HINTS 01 » s TILE. is) The comis- sionet shall develop and maintain a procedure for processing reports of violations of AS 18,35,300 and 10.35.330 or of a regulation adopted under AS 18.15,360. M tr (b) If, after investipting a report Mde under this eeetlon. the essmis#lener determines that a violation has occurred, t1) the $s commissioner may film a civil eamptaint in the district court to >o enforce the provisions of As 18.35,300 - 16.35,365 or of a regulation to adopted under AS 18,35.360$ or t2) so employ.* of the department • i ; I; » de, ivsted by the eommisioner to enfosee the provisions of A6 IS.- 35.i00 - 18-15.365 nay issue a citation under AS 18.35.3419b). If an '. r lepioyse of the department issues a citation, the violation ahsll be » Processed and disposed of under AS IS.35.341. person vho violets# AS 18.35.100 and sgsinat whom the �i » emmiasioner hot filed a eivii complaint under this section is hpunfsh- i » able by a civil ties of nor less than $10 nor mars than $50. A person who violate# A6 18.15.330 and sgainst whom the commissioner has filed s civil eoplsint under this ssetian is punishable by # civil fine of SO C.Ni g41Ilnf se S i Chapter 36 not less than $20 now sore then $300. goth dap a violation of AS . 16.35.330 continues after a civil complaint for the violation has been filed and served on the defendant constitutes a separate violation. (d) The department nap provide for the psymsat of civil fines under this section by mil. • Set. 7. AS 15.35 to amended by adding now sections to reads Set. 19,35.341. CITAT10ASs PENALTY. (a) A peace officer my Loewe a citation for a violation of AS 15.35.300 committed to the Officer's presence or for a violation of AS 1S.35.330. The provisions of AS 12.25.150(b) and 12.25,190 - 12.25.230 apply to the Issuance of a citation under this subsection. ib) An employee of the department designated by the commissioner to enforce the provisions of AS 18.35.300 - 18.35.365 say issue a citation for a violation of AS 15.35.300 or 15.35.330 regardless of whether the violation ves committed In the employee's presence. A citation issued under this subsection shall be In the some fats and .hail be processed In the saris manner as a citation Issued by a peace officer under (a) of this section. An employee of the department soy net arrest a person for a violation of AS 16.35.300 or 18.35.330. (e) A person Who violstao AS 1S.35.300 or 15.3$.330 Is guilty of a violation as defined In AS 11.51.90001061 sad upon conviction is punisfable by a tine of not less then $10 new war* than $50 for a violation of AS 18.35.300 and by a fine of not lose time $20 not more than $300 for a violation of AS 18.35.330. tech day s violetioss of AS 13.35.330 continues after a citation for the violation has been issued constitutes a sepormte violation. id) The supreme court mhall establish a schedule of bolt amounts for violations of AS IS.35.300 and 13.35.330. but in no event may the boil amount exceed the maximum tine that may be imposed for the •5. US CSSS Sigtn) am S i Chapter 34 .t violation under (e) of this section. Us bail amount for a violation t . shall appear on the citation. S (01 A person cited for a violation under this section may. e within 13 days aftst the date of the citation. mail or personally • deliver to the clerk of the court in which the eltation Is flied • (1) the amount of bail indicated on the citation for that � violation, and s (2) a copy of the citation indleating that the right to an s appearaaee is Waived, a plea of no contest to Catered and the bail is to forfeited. is tf) When bail has been forfeited under W of this section. a it judgment of conviction shall be entered. Forfeiture of bell Is a q complete satisfaction for the violation. The clerk of the court t. accepting the ball shall provide the violator with a receipt sestin8 K that fact. (g) If the person Cited falls to pay the bail amount established It under (d) of this section or to appear in court as required. the to eitatiem is considered a summoas for a misdemeanor. is gee. 18.33.342. ROLTIFU nWZS YMIBITW. A person may not be Road nose than care for each violation of AS 19.35.300 or 13.35.310. H Bee. 18.35.343. INJUMIONS. Tht eommisoloner or �,,�6 anF affected t! VU* 64 Institute an sctiom In the superior court to enjoin repeated is wiotatIMS of AS 18.35.300 or Ii.35.330 or of a regulation adopted 14 Under A8 3i.33.3i0. IS • See. S. AS 18.35.350 to amended to reeds x See. 16.31.350. ZNF0Xc9m R AutwxtTT. The commissioner (Or 221 GRTR0MMML CONSLROATION) or the commissioner'• INISI designee is „ responsible for enforcing the provisions of AS 16.35.300 - 13.33.36s �s IAS 15-35.300 - 19.3S.3401 and the regulation, adopted under M CM ie(Fts) as S .6. 1� Y w /� �iatieirartr� Chapter 34 t AS 18.35.360. This section does not limit the authority of peace : officers. f • See. 9. AS 18.35 is amended by adding a now section to reeds t Sec. 18.35.35S. PUSLtC EDUCATION. The commissioner shall take s appropriate measures to Inform the public of the provisions of AS IS.- s 35.300 - 13.35.365. • Sec. 10. AS 13.35.360 to repealed. s • See. 11. AS 18.35 is amended by adding a new section to reads s See. 18.35.365. DEFINITIONS. In AS 18.35.300 - 16.35.365. a (1) "commissioner" means commissioner of rttvirotroetttsl is conservations of (2) "department" means the Department of Lnvlronmental 13 Conservation. it • See. 12. AS 12.23.190(c) is amended to reads is (e) The person cited for the trim shall give a 19161 written u promise to appear in court by signing at least "a copy of the written tf citation prepared by the peace officer and the officer shall deliver a u copy of the citation to the person. The written promise requirement It of this subsection does not apply to motor vehicle and traffic cita- tion* under AS 23.05.151 or a citation Issued under AS 18.35.341. tt • See. 13. I8 AAC SS.060 Is stoned. SCS CSHS 84(fin) as 8 1 J 4 OR Anchorago Daily flows Thism(MY, July 5, 1984 ^ When, -the uoke uroeeo Confusion over new rules could have some folks doing a slow burn 0 M PUFFIN NO PUFFIN PERMITTED The law By ABAGAIL JUNGREIS Daily News correspondent n July 17, a smokeless wind of change will sweep through Alaska. A law, passed by the state legislature this past session, will make smoking in many public places and all state and local office hable bya maximui m $50 fine, Signs with ist the bright red message "Smoking Prohibited By Law" will go up in bars, prisons and airports all over the state. The law will allow owners and managers to set aside a place for smokers to light up, but it won't be nonsmokers who have to search for areas where they can be comfortable. Curtis Mekemson, executive director of the Alaska Lung Association, which lobbied hard for the legislation, says the law calls for a change in attitudes. "In the final analysis," he says, "nonsmokers' rights take precedence over smokers'." State officials agree with Mekemson on the law's intent. But less than a month before it goes into effect, they're still not sure how it will actually work. "It's really crazy," says Bill MacClarence at the Anchorage District office of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. ' The DEC is responsible for implementing the law. MacClarence, an air quality engineer, used to spend all his time on air pollution control. Lately, he's been answering a lot of questions about where state employees can smoke and what will happen to smokers who violate the law. MacClarence points out that, though legisla- tors appropriated $20,000 to print no -smoking j signs and send out Information to the public, there's no money for enforcement. He can't see sending DEC agents all over his district — which stretches from Yakutat to the Aleutians — to write citations for illegal puffing. "Our travel budget is not such that we're going to run to Dutch Harbor to arrest someone for smoking," he says. In Juneau, Billie Trent, administrative as- sistant to DEC Commissioner Richard Neve, says that peace officers will be able to issue citations, dealing with smoking violators in much the same way they handle litterers. If no police officer is�}'ound, a person can go to a regional or distsict office and fill out a complaint form — but to do that, he or she will have to get the name of the offender. . "It could be a problem if you're up against a creep," says Jana Baumann, an information officer at the DEC. "In that case you may end up jumping up and down." An even more frustrating task may be figuring out where to light up. The law states that managers, owners and supervisors can create smoking sections — though they don't have to — but they must make "reasonable accommodations" for the needs of smokers and nonsmokers. "Who decides what's reason- able?" asks MacClarence. Not the DEC. According to a ruling from the Attorney General's office, the DEC has not been given the authority to create regulations that will Interpret the law. The most the department can do Is issue suggested guide- lines. A consultant, hired to write those guide- lines, didn't start work until the end of June. DEC officials are hoping he'll be done in time for them to send out a mass mailing before the law takes effect. "We're planning on a great blitz of information, on the law as soon as we have something to blitz." says BIIN Trent. In the meantime, Trent estimates that her office is getting six to 10 calls a day about the no -smoking law. Does the law cover the rooms of interns who live at Alaska Psychiatric Institute? What about prisoners' cells? And what if a state employee doesn't put up a no - smoking sign In a state office? Does the state get fined? "We can't tell anyone how to implement the law," says Trent. "Every single building is going to have a different compliance." Trent thinks the confusion will eventually straighten out, and the law will cease to be an Issue. But she realizes there may be problems In the first couple of months. "There will be some people that feel like they're living in a communist state and they'll want to make a statement and smoke under a sign." In Anchorage, Bill MacClarence agrees that there will be plenty of conflicts in the months ahead. "What you need Is a couple of sore- heads — either smokers or nonsmokers — and you'll have a lot of problems,"he says. Reaction ity workers, state bureaucrats. bar hoppers and restaurant owners — few people in Anchorage are going to remain unaffected by the law that prohibits smoking in food service m abllsh- ments and government offices. How will we cope? Donna Ross, an administrative assistant at the Attorney General's office in Anchorage, doesn't think her office will have problems conforming to the new law. Workers have already formed a committee to desiggnate smoking areas, but some are obvious. "Attor- neys can sit in their offices and puff away," says Ross. Determining where two secretaries can smoke is be more complicated. One will have to move her desk a little farther from every- one else. The other will have to step into the office of a paralegal who smokes when she feels the need to light up. E Since the early 1960s, reports have shown - - Workers in Title Administration at thel that smoking increases the risk of lung and Alaska Department of Natural Resources heart disease. But recent findings show that don't have offices to which they can retreat. cigarette smoke affects more than just the They don't even have partitions between their person who lights up. Nonsmokers who work desks. or live in smoky areas may have the same �^• "1 can't work without a cigarette in my health problems as people who smoke half a mouth," says Roxanne Auge, unsure of how pack a day. A report, Issued at the end of May she will cope with the new law. "There's by the U.S. Surgeon General, says passive always welfare," suggests a colleague. smoking is a proven health hazard. Lonnie Nelson, a fellow smoker, has a Rodman Wilson, director of the Anchorage smoke -eater on his desk. -I kind of agree with Department of Health and Environmental the new law." he says. "Nonsmokers ought to Protection, goes even further. "The three have a say if they're bothered. It's a nasty goals considered by experts to be most impor- habit." _ tant to world public health are prevention of I He holds an unlit cigarette in his hand and, See Page E-3, SMOKING I smiles. "Are the people who enforce the law. going to wear armbands so we can grab a :Ivor /jxtud a !> quick smoke when their backs are turned?" At the next desk, Sue Putnam, a nonsmok- er, also worries about how the law will be enforced. "It will be a bad situation if co- Who's affected? workers are going to snitch on each other for a $50 fine." Bars will also need designated smoking areas, but that doesn't bother Mr. Whitekeys tarting July 17, 6-by-10-inch signs with at the Fly By Night Club. He'll create a the words "Smoking Prohibited By nonsmoking section, but he adds, "Being a Law Maximum Fine $50" will appear complete nonsmoker myself, I'm not as con- Sin these places: cerned about sections as I am about air • Waiting and restrooms in doctors' . and quality in the room as whole." dentists' and other health care offices. All Air quality at Chilkoot Charlie's on a public spaces, including the lobby and hall - Friday night is rather low, and smokers there ways, of hospitals, nursing homes and other ` can't imagine it any other way. medical facilities. "How are they going to enforce the law in a • Public transportation and its waiting and bar like this?" asks Kathy Muchmore, waving boarding areas. That means taxis (unless the her cigarette at the haze. driver says it's OK and makes sure all "It's ridiculous!" says Les Miller, taking a passengers agree), buses, trains, ferries, air- _ deep drag. "If people don't like smoking they planes and the terminals and stations where >can lave. This is America!" you catch them — including the airport. His friend Wally Turbo, sitting next to him • Public and private schools and day care at the bar, shakes his head. "I disagree. centers. Smoking is a privilege." • Elevators, 'Men move to Russia," answers Miller. • All buildings and offices owned, lased or "I have the right to breathe clean air. I'm operated by the state, municipal and local sick of people blowing smoke into my face," governments. Besides the offices where gov- i says Turbo. ernment employees work. that includes It - Miller takes another puff in disgust. "Why braries, convention centers and auditoriums, do people come to bars — to drink and to prisons, theaters, police stations, courtrooms smoke," he says. "You might as well shut the- and jury deliberation rooms, rooms used for bars." public meetings and assemblies while they are going on, universities, even an outhouse in Chugach State Park. �I 1liJh the law? • Grocery and food stores.tseat Y more than 50 peiople. Thati shments means large restau- !{{ rants, take-out places, catering concerns and I he legislation explains the reason be- bars' ' hind the new no -smoking law in less • Any place of employment in which the •, than a sentence: "Smoking in any form owner or manager posts a sign saying that is a nuisance and a public health haz- smoking is prohibited a law. ard. Employers and managers who do not post 300. Curtis Mekemson. executive director of the ; those signs face fines of e t toe up Alaska Lung Association, can back that sim- ple , Smoking will continue to be up to personal ,� i preference in private businesses, homes and pelt line with pages of proof. Smoking carries stores that don't sell food. And even in the - a trtsmendous cost to employers and society,' buildings that are covered by the law, manag- he says. Mekemaon points to studies that ers and owners can designate separate smok- show smokers take 50 percent more sick leave ing areas. than non-smokers: that smoking increases the ' . cost of running ventilation systems: and that i the conflict between smoking and nonsmoking workers can cause serious morale problems. f f _ �i f CAMS TIPPETTS-ABBETT-McCARTHY-STRATTON A PBOFFMIaM OON1U M10Y &W&EW N P," s.N F - y City of Kenai Post Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention Mr. William Brighton July 10, 1984 City Manager Invoice 150-8 Engineering Services - Financial Analysis and Outline Design Study - Per Agreement approved on May 31, 1983. Periods April/May/June 1984 Task 1 - Demand Analysis & Facility Inventory - $18,700.00 ' 100% Complete $18,700.00 � Less Previous Billings 18,700.00 ' 0 Task 2 - Harbor Functional Requirements - $8,000.00 " 100% Complete $ 8,000.00 ' Less Previous Billings 8,000.00 - 0 $ 0 Task 3 - Environmental Review - $11,000 100% Complete $11,000.00 - Less Previous Billings 11,000.00 ' 0 $ 0 Task 4 - Conceptual Design Alternatives - $36,600.00 100% Complete $36,600.00 Less Previous Billings 36,600.00 - 0 $ 0 4791 BUSI%*ESS PARK BOULEVARD. SUITE ONE - ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503 - TELEPHONE (907) 562-2822 i �� e 1 'I ' � 1 City of Kenai - 2 - Invoice 150-8 Task 5 - Preliminary Cost ' Estimate - $8,500.00 100% Complete $ 81500.00 - Less Previous Billings 8,500.00 - I 0 $ 0� Task 6 - Financial/Benefit Analysis - $20,100.00 � 100% Complete $20,100.00 ! - Less Previous Billings 20,100.00 _ 0 $ 0 Task 7 - Analysis of Preferred Alternative - $15,400.00 i 100% Complete $15,400.00- Less Previous Billings 15,400.00 0 $ 0 �. Task 8 - Report Production - $17#300.00 100% Complete $17,300.00 Less Previous Billings 12,110.00 ' 5,190.00 $5,190.00 - Total This Invoice . . . 55,190.00 TIPPETTS-ABBETT-McCARTHY-STRATTON' A Professional Corporation Attachment_ - Summary 711110Y /zr �pETTS ABBETT- Mc CARTHY-STRATTON - . farRIU M•u- co►rMraMOV c�civtltS I� ! City of Kenai �l Post Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention Mr. William Brighton July 10, 1984 i City Manager Invoice 150-8 Engineering services - Financial Analysis and outline Design Study - Per Agreement approved on May 32, 1983. Period: April/May/June 1984 Task 1 - Demand Analysis & Facility Inventory - $18,700.00 100% Complete $18,700.00 Less Previous Billings 18,700.00 0 $ 0 �. Task 2 - Harbor Functional V Requirements - $8,000.00 Q D 100% Complete $ 8,000.00 Less Previous Billings 8,000.00 0 $ 0 Task 3 - Environmental t Review - $11,000 100% Complete $11,000.00 Less Previous Billings 11,000.00 0 $ 0 Task 4 -Conceptual Design Alternatives - $36,600.00 K e.; 100% Complete $36,600.00 Less Previous Billings 36,600.00 0 $ 0 -" 4791 BUSI%ESS PARK BOULEVARD. SUITE ONE ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503 TELEPHONE (907) SG2.2822 i 1 , R . I I i • t1 1 I City of Kenai - 2 - Invoice 150-8 Task 5 - Preliminary Cost Estimate - $8,500.00 100% Complete $ $1500.00 Less Previous Billings 8,500.00 0 S 0 Task 6 - Financial/Benefit Analysis - $20,100.00 100% Complete $20,100.00 Less Previous Billings 20,100.00 0 $ 0 Task 7 - Analysis of Preferred Alternative - $15,400.00 100% Complete $15,400.00 Less Previous Billings 15,400.00 0 $ 0 �. Task 8 - Report Production - $17,300.00 100% Complete $17,300.00 Less Previous Billings 12,110.00 5,190.00 $5,190.00 Total This Invoice . . . . . . $51190.00 TIPPETTS-ABSETT-McCARTHY-STMTTON A Professional Corporation Attachment Summary J v' f q -. 7-, I:.4, , . . _f V r A nnn&Q.1"SULTING ENGINEERS Hunainen.. RE, June 280, 1984 " 83'ATII�'�1T Jack LaShot City of Kenai 'JUNiT4 Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99669 City r;4 i' mt ID Haller, Evergreen CAD Project No. 83108 Progress Billing No. 6 Professional services Engineer I - 16.0 Hours @ $67 ' 0ufineer II - 7.0 Hours @ $57' Engineer IV - 128.0 Hours @ $45" Project Engineer - 32.5 @ $57 Tedinician III - 29.5 Hours @ $35 Draftsman I - 20.0 @ $35- Draftsman 11 - 14.5 Hours @ 027 avenses 1 - Vehicle - 5 Days @ $10' 1 - Vehicle - 4 Days @ 010' Surveyors Exchange - $115.75 x 1.1 Total Amount Due Total 1b Date 01,072.00 399.00' 5,760.00- 1,852.50 ' -333-.-Re WAS, 700.00- 391.50 $ 11,207.50 50.00' 40.00' 127.33' $ 217.33 $ 11,424.83 � $180,240.47 ✓ i 7I 104 :?Roar) >Y ,..n, T CtTv u�rta6Zp .__ _ x . TTDR•iEY :.Tr h� 71 V d ti. --I 7-Nra - ,.� carmen vincent gintoli, architect Dox 4625 professional building suite 110 Kenai, alaska 99611 907 283.7732 June 29, 1984 •�(�' JUNA984 �' City cs Ke�GepS. ai City of Kenai •1uGtic ;�o�lS ; 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention: Keith Kornel i s, Director ),-I r, Dept. of Public Works .----- Re: Invoice for Architectural Services Kenai Senior Citizens Community Center Completion of Year End Inspection & Follow Through Per Contract . , I THANK YOU $643.00 A . it `vDTU`LL = LL I%I JV CONSULTING ENGINEERS P O Ees 1041 907.293.4672 KENA1, ALASKA 99611 zA/F-D-7 July 11, 1984 +�! 7i, js11 84.22 C City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo St. t� �..• Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention: Keith Kornelis �•,y���t�` Subject: Billing for Thompson Park Road Improvements Please consider this invoice for Engineering services provided for the subject project .from beginning of project to July 10, 1984. I N V O I C E PROJECT: Thompson Park OUR JOB NO. 84.22 Engineer I 49.5 hrs @ $55.50/hr/ $2747.25 Engineer III 71.0 hrs @ $47.00/hr " $3337.00 ' Engineer IV 227 hrs @ $38.50/hr' $8739.50' Surveying Invoice 84-53(1)= $11,600 10% $12,760.00� Invoice 84-53(2)f $8690 +• 10% $9559.001, Mileage 813 miles @ $0.35/mile ' $284.55 $37,427.30 Y No Tax - City Project .00 Amount Due $37,427.30'Y, I certify that the above charges are correct and no payment has been received therefore. Very truly yours, WINCE-CORTHELL-BRYSON %/�/B'�I • . `•{: r, 7 Philip W. Bryson - Accounts not paid within 30 days of date of invoice will be subject to charges 1.�% per month from date of invoice. Philip W irysoe I E Alen N Corthell t I honk W Wine* ► E ' 1 a PAY ESTIMATE CITY OF KENAI A/ r- 0 - 8 NO• Project FIRST AND SECOND STREETS, PAVING, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - 1983 Contractor Prosser Construction Company Address 1360 East 71st Avenue Alaska Anchorage, Ala99502 Project No. #8334 Phone 344-9223 i Period From 1/26/84 to 7/11/84 ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE , Ol Original contract amount $ 566,230.00 Net change by change orders 6,300.00 JO3 Adjusted contract amount to date $ 572,530.00 ANALYSIS OF WORT: COMPLETED O Original contract work completed 539,571.05 � r OS Additions from change orders completed 6,300.00 o �6 Materials stored :nt close of period -0- O Total earned O4 O +- 6O = 545,871.05 i; i s:; S Less retainac-e of 5 percent 27,293.55 '.' Total earned less retaina c 3 = 518,577.50 1tt Less amount of previous payments 433,685.52 Balance due this pnvment 84,891.98 j cc: Contractor Prosser Construction Company �/ J ��,,,,,� �''• ?� Engineer Wm. J. Nelson and Associates �I t r i I y# 6 t J Y✓ Will If „f PAY ESTIMATE N0: 5 CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR 1.c.,tdinre to the hest of my knouleJpe and belief. I ectt,ry that all Items and amounts shown nn the face of this Periodic Estimate tot PAttsAI Payment are correct: that all work has been perto:mes and 'at material aurplsed in full .accordance with the requitetrents Ar the rrictenced Centtact, and or July authvitzrd Jet•ta:sons, subsnturtons, .,iterations, and or additions; that the forepotnc is a :rue and correct %tatcmcnt of the contract account up to anJ irclul+nr the loot day at the perfud covered by this Persixi+c E.s:smote; .has no part of the "Balance Ouc This Payment" has Seen tcccttc•d, and that the undersilmud And his subcontractors have-(Checir a, a .Complied with all the labor provisions of said contract. b. ;� Complied with all the labor provisions of said contract cacert in those instances where an honest dispute exists with it- spvct to said labor provisions. (it (b) is checked. describe Inert)nuurr of ill -pule.) 13y xnsture as Aughttee.04irpre,tentsdv.) 19 EL Title �� CERTIFICATION OF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 1 certify that I have checked anJ vc-titicd the Abuse and iorcrutne Pviiodi. Estimate for Partial Payment. that to the best of my knotvtvJgv and hclivf it is a true and ccirrvet statement of work pcfformvd and •or matvffal supplied by the contractor; that all work And or material included in this Pvriu.fic Estimate has huun in>pcctcd by mt and 'or by oil% duty authorized (cptrsentative or As.issrnts an.1 that it Ila% hewn;-enufneJ .fill iax suprlicd in full aecurJAnvc with rcyusra•mvnts .sf Poe tvfyfvuq;v contract; .end that , Aft+al raymv Ill claimed And regfu•atcd by the contractor is correctly eamputa•d ail the basis of weak pyrturmed and 'or mate- #,..! supplied to JAN. d �sctted ' /- %��t7 / "090190•f o . `' �NT7 C't . Atebst.•rt or ens-,mr.•r) PRE•PAYMENTCERTIFICATfON BY FIELD ENGINEER 'f----••---••-• ••- •• '" " : at lrlal ,v _ ........... Chrc& type of payment caetsrt.-W I hate cha•ak.•d thi, e.tsmsfv erAin.t the ntracsW*' SfAr.Frt.• .dA;i..arne: !.•r C.nrr.t:t P.rvtnrnn., list- oofa•.'.ind rep.,rf: of my � tn.pa•a•tt.•a..11 the Prow". .811A flit .%rs..Ji. rer.•tt..ul•mitt•.a h• dw .a. hit.•ct a neanv.-r. It s, my urinwn that sha .taivaicni of -ft. rets..rna•J At.a .•t Ina:an.oI. •.u:�lsv.t 1. a:: urAta. t:. o: •... ..nA.e. r.•r .+ . ...rt rn.; ill, Ivy 11, cnt., at th.• . ontrA:t, Aril that the contractor %hould 1.c I•ai.: the itntiusit ra•quc.ted A. et t . t^.At all %%.it,..tn.l matvrsal, uttAt r dw at•nt:a, t !.sa s s . -n its .y •., i. a :•y III,: .tu.1 that it h.t. item titlefflivJ An4 t•t 'UP. _ • ,;tvd in t.-1: Aa:vrJAu.c :t t:i: the. ft jut:. rn. nt+ of thi:: •titre.:. --•:.t r J (Fir i.l £n.:wern (Dare) ,C.,nrr.. unit 016a a.. .IWO) .. r..i� .l.l.. N-W., s. . w ... a_w...y.e. .. .-rfw•.,. ar .. r.. rr.� .._ � - - v...�..r.wv--.+i ..:. -.r - __ CITY OF KENAI FOR COUNCIL INFORMATION i Transfers of Funds under $1,000 under KMC 7.25.020 (a) Date Department Amount From To Explanation 7-9-84 Legal 8 $271.96 Mach/Equip ui Q P Small Tools To purchase secretary chair P Y THE FOLLOWING TRANSFERS WERE FROM FY 1983-84 BUDGET: 6-18-84 Police 200.00 Operating Supp. Small Tools To purchase tact vest 6-19-84 Recreation 100.00 Transp. Rep/Maint. Repair of sink in utility room. 6-19-84 Non -Dept. 660.00 Oper. Supp. Rep/Maint. Additional repair to Fine Arts roof 6-21-84 PW/Streets 900.00 Rep/Maint. Rentals Rental of dozer to move gravel 6-22-84 Senior Center 150.00 Oper. Supp. Rep/Maint. Repair of freezer 6-22-84 Jail 900.00 Transp. Oper. Supp. Food, film, misc. supplies 6-25-84 Shop 200.00 Transp. Rep/Maint. Prep. for painting & body work on police car #59 0 !f o% Ky W-9 ,.Project TH MPSON PAP.R ROAD IMPROW-m--s Contractor ,t,,,, L,,,,,n,*Q,,r I}Sc • Address U,+ ;,,,r,+,, nrrvp A'askaSm -Phone 2!�8-5094 _T:AtFO -!0 1 •,�i P1 Sr A r •'ti Project No. . - Peri-od From s 2� 5� /84 to -;jW" :. A`ALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT MOUNT TO DATE ,Ol • Original contract amount S&SI tl_gI " 2 Net change by change orders t .Adjusted contract amount to date --e— t Js/C� k go .� w� . • "' ANALYSIS 07 WORK COMPLETED w•�+��mrrlF�w `��.• . . 4 '' Origina'_ contract work campl^ted 98,992.00 OS Additions from change orders completed _0_ Materials stored at close of period 16,05.80 �? Total earned D•O+O= f 115,677.80 9►' OLess retainage or 10 percent 11,567.78 OTotal earned less rrta;_,wgcO.O= _ 104,110.02 ✓ 0Less amount of previous payMents _0_ 0 Balance due th_:s payment cc: Contractor _Ca is uctivn Cn? i•lited• Inc. Engineer w�nr[+_ �'n}•Vn2+LET •'� �n i J� I .«;„ �"�. +ram++► -44 A Y E S T' M A T r N U: :.CgRTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR 'Accord,njt to the best of my knowledge and belie►. I ccrtifv that all items and amounts shown on the face of this PeridR GtiatsM ,..,, to Partial Payntem are correct; that All work has been ;•rrfs,fm.ro and/or material supplsvd in full accordance with the ttts;iiie+nuMs at the referenced Concracc. And:ot July Au:auttred dcvi.:tsuns, sulsst•tut.on•s. alterati—It, asid/or additions; that the 1en)<o08 is a +.,. «ue and cotrc:t stjtctnt•nc o• rmc contracc 4rcc.unr up to Ind snc.vJsnN the last %isi• of the period coveted by this Periodic I?stifaate= that no parr of the "•.dance Due Thi. Psymes t'• has been re:cs.rd, and that the undersitned and his subcontractors iMwq"06k '',j,'pp•leatte tfnel a. (L1 Complied with all the labor provisions of said contract. i .b. CComplied wash Ali cSir !&JM provisions of sAid contract except in those instances where an ht/aestd1ge.M'SA M;wltllttoo �.� • spect to sai.! labor p:cvistor:s. cp (b) is eAechsa, desorite i•rielly noise of a/eput*.) , t }r A Constrtiction Unllltited. Inc. By fir;:r..,.. • _ t1J+ .•iY (Caaracsoq (Ltaattw ec AtalierlsN � . � . July 2 t984 Titre President i }•., -CERTIFICATION OF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER •:i,:eettity that I have checked .rind vetif ieJ the above and forrguinc Periodic Estimate for PArciat Payment= that tithe •oat aly v „*llisotlled a aed be [tot it it A true Arad cotrs•et st.stement of "of"t performed and/or material supplied by the euniraao; that•.ii ,,. `srk and msterial iticludod in this Oct sod ic 1:%timate hA•i bw.it inspvctcJ by mw and!or by my deny authorised aprewswiM ea assistants And mat it has barn ptrinrmed :sad /tv snrp!sed in 061:1 sceardancw wit» requirements d fiic reference eontrAR; Jed • : ,tthat partial payment cl,t,med And totiuvord by (lie contim c sr rr sasrrowtty rompusrJ on the basis of work pedal tic I a*Wgr timoo stud sup • •J o JAM. q fiiftacd t �%�!� �� •�eGV`b .:Y :ii'1 ;! "�»Ritl •Jt (Atctsiisel ativemot►e is'ince, Cortholl, i$r.ySon•.Agttt.,,.,..."_,,,_,,,_ r1fJANCd l�S Date �('r)81 :7,;2ri k PREPAYMENT CERTIFICATION BY FIE1.0 ENGINEER x""'TV rt,;;tlt � eaeea type of parstiont terrslowlet COPY jSf aavr whwAwJ tni. w.tim,ae AgAinst tlsw contrAcae•, S.�r.•. sr w uf'Aro.aasG for tstC I` r ct jyjymentst, g1F mica &R lt�tty inspection. art she proles•.: nd the rt•rualw r.•rwt, ,uhnurt. a Iav •hc Afchuwet rvnrineef. It st my opinitM that the etAteneae ad ,work rwridrmt•d Ass: or m.itertAlr ,vjR'isca s, ,u.urarc. t'sts :he .antra.tw sx ob.wevinr the taausrcatents of she cowrAw.,&W that the cuntracu.f showiJ !.r rAsu rtt. Ansvunt rcgw.teai .,1•.n .•. C I catnip th.st All ,.wk .tnd or 'nAta riAl, under tilt- c.astrA: r Lt. I•wwn in.racivd by mr And chat it hat. been petfortacd AWJ. ea aup- plswd in f '' at:o w asfn shy rwyisstt.tnents of IS,; .stiff W. .s 3 � WL=Q• Corthel2} Bryson cp.rl.t Enaieeert x7 00tastell Apptored tCwsrecunts Wficeri tYeai • T.1 70 too �— n zoo". 77 4