HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-10-22 Council Packet - Work SessionKenai City Council
Work Session
October 22, 1985
Capital Improvement Projects
City Cemetery
MM
CITY OF KENAI
" Od Gtz;ad dl 4 4"„
210 PIDAL00 KBNAI, ALAOKA ON11
TBLBPMONB 2" - 7835
NOTICE OF WORK SESSION
There will be a work session of the Kenai City Council on
Tuesday, October 229 1985 at 7:00 PM in the Council chambers.
To be discueeedl
1. 1985-86 Capital Improvement Projects
2. 1986-87 Capital Improvement Projects
3 City Cemetery
The public is invited to attend and participate.
a,v IIJJA,t,
Janet Whelan
City Clerk
DATEDI October 18, 1985
CITY OF KENAI
law 4 4"If
610FIDALOO KIN1,AMOKA $all
TIUMMONa M • 76M6
MEMORANDUM
TOs Wm, J. Brighton, City Manager
FROM: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director
DATEs October 22, 1985
SUBJECTs SUMMARY OF 1985-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
(Cost in $1,000)
(E) Robin, Kensitze, Eagle Rock, Send Piper,
tern, S. Strawberry - G $270
(E) S. Spruce St. - Spur to Reach - P
do Parking Lots (,,,+ $400
(E) Ju-l-ivaeell-i-B4&Lav-te*y. Ames, Berabera,
Angler -- G .,.,� ",- !..(our., $730
Future LID $500
Old Town - ROW + $150
Airport Way - P v (1 %�=� .a���,rq.-o. $570
Cook-Ln_4et View -_Dr &-t-11ec-t-ans. $450
Trading Bey and Granite Point $160
85/06 CIP GRANT a $2,300
KK/sw
U
y�
I
CITY OF KENAI
"Dll G'law 4 4"„
210 PIDAL00 KENAI, ALABKA M11
TROMONB 20.7eae
September 27, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TOs Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager
FROMs Keith Kornelis, Public Works
Director
SUBJECTs 1985-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS FOR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF OCTOBER 20 1985
Below is a list of the projects that the
City Council
chose for
construction using the $2.3 million State
Legislative
Grant.
This list was derived by the Council at
the work session of
September 23, 1985. The costa listed below
are rough
estimates
in thousands of dollars.
(E) Robing Kenaitze Eagle Rockp Send
Pi er
torn, 5& , raw err
Administration "'—'
1
Inspect/Survey/Test
20
Construction
230
Contingency
9
270
(E) S Spruce St. - Spur to Beach P
_ Parking o s__
—Administration
1
Inspect/Survey/Teat
26
Construction
339
Contingency
34
400
(E) Juliuseen 8sainview, Ames,
are ars. Angier -
Administration
1
Inspect/Survey/Teat
46
Construction
633
Contingency
50
730
Future LSD
500
Old Town - ROW +
150
H
e
r
,
I
7
Airaor.t Way - P
m n s ration 1
Engineer design 26
Engineer Inspection 37
Construction 461
Contingency 45
570
TOTAL 29TX
I received the construction cost estimates on the first three
projects from Oceantech, Design Engineers. They are approx-
imately 90% complete on the construction plane and specifications
for these three projects. You will notice that the third project
(Juliussen, 8asinview, Ames, 8ersbara and Angler) has increased
considerably. After completing the quantity computations, soils
testing, and surveying for design on these five roods, the design
nioyitinnre► ruunJ uuneiderably more work then origineiiy
anticipated. Most of thess roads are upgrading of existing roads
with the exception of the extension on Ames, which the Council
added to the project after receiving a request from the residents
in that area. If you recall, the property owners even gave up
part of their private property to create a public right-of-way
for the construction of this road extension.
As you can see from the figures listed below, the City is
$320v000 short from completing these projects as estimated.
$2,620,000 - Estimated Project Cost
$2 300 000 - 85/86 CIP Grant
- Short
The City Council does have many alternatives, such eat
1. Cut -back on the amount of work to be done on one or all of
the above projects.
2. Contribute $3209000 of General Fund CIP Reserves.
3. Eliminate one of the above projects, completely.
One thing that the Council might consider is cutting back on the
funds set aside for future LID projects. If you notice all of
the construction projects listed above, plus the ones we
presently have under construction, have a contingency fund for
possible problems encountered during construction. At the end of
the project we usually have funds left over in the project that
could be reallocated for use in the future LIDe.
Charlie and I were going to draw up an ordinance appropriating
the $2.3 million for Council consideration at this next meeting
using the above projects. However, we have not because there are
insufficient grant funds at the estimated project costs. Since
there is no emergency rush on the ordinance we have decided to
wait until the Council gives us more direction on how to handle
the expenditure of these funds.
KK/ ow
r
r;
I
I ,
v
I
III- -- - - - - -- - - - - --
. � WiiwfedeMiw.�
October 2, 1985
WmnRANniom
G lob
i
CITY OF KENAI
" Del Gapdal aG 4"„
210 FIDAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 0111H
TELEPKON112e3-Mo
TO: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager
FROM: Keith Kornelie, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
As per your request I have come up with a rough cost estimate in
thousands of dollars for the capital improvement projects listed
below;
1. Cook Inlet View Dr. & Lilac Lane
Administration 1
Inspect/Survey/Test 37
Construction 370
Contingency 42
450
The above construction cost came from Oceentech who is presently
working on the design. (It seems low to me.).
2. TradingBe & Granite Point
Curo and outters
Administration 1
Engineering Design 6
Inspect/Survey/Test 6
Construction 107
Contingency 10
130
To add sidewalks:
One aide = +32,000 162
Both sides o +64,000 194
Summarys Trading Ray & Granite Point
Curb &gutters only a $130 000
Curb, gutters, one sidewalk $162,000
Curb, gutters, two sidewalks $194,000
I
CITY OF KENAI
(?ardad 4 4"'F#
910 FIOAL00 KLNAL ALASKA Well
TEWHON8 983.7833
MEMORANDUM
TO: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director
FROM: Jack LaShot, City Engineer
DATE: October 22p 1995
SUBJECT: CEMETERY PLATTING
I has,e been putting pressure on Hugh Malone for a couple of
months now to get a drawing prepared showing areas with existing
graves in the cemetery. According to Hugh, this has caused him
somewhat of a problem as no real records exist. Before leaving
on vacation (10-11-B5), I took Hugh a copy of a book which
attempts to catalog all existing graves. At that time Hugh
assured me that he would work on a drawing of the cemetery and
meet with Tim Wisniewski to verify grave locations and add
information.
Upon returning from vacation, I found that the meeting did not
take place. I have set up a meeting for Wednesday afternoon with
Hugh, Tim and myself at the cemetery to verify grave locations.
Hugh can then prepare a plan for the cemetery showing existing
developed areas and potential alternatives for the new area that
we have fenced. Upon review of this plan by the City and
approval, the actual platting process can take place.
Hugh is being very careful to accurately locate existing graves.
Without this information, platting new grave plots will
definitely cause problems, which Hugh does not want to create.
JLS/sw
r
Y � V
MEMO TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director ea Q
DATE: September 24, 1985
SUBJECT: Assessments
At last night's workeession, the subject of using $500000 of the $2.3
million grant for matching money on assessment districts was discussed.
We will earmark this money for assessment districts. however, at some
pnl.nr., tho AdminlarraHnn 011 nePA npne1P4e g9OAe11nee on hoto to
advise the public of the availability of these funds.
Council agreed that it•would be used to match against a 50% assessment
for paving projects. We have authori$ed/unissued bonds of $11,150,0009
of which 0340,000 should be sold for the Aliak/McCollum project. That
leaves $810#000 of available bonds for advance financing of the
assessed portion.
The questions to be considered ores ,
1) if water and/or sower services are requested in conjunction with
paving, shall those services also be available for the 502
assessment ratio?
2) if a developer/subdivider requests a 502 assessment district, are
these funds available to him?
3) If Council wishes to exclude developers, which seems to be the
precedent set (L e ., Inlet Woods, Sprucewood Glen, Stellar), how
do we identify a developer? A party that owns 20% of the land in
i a proposed district? How about SO%? ,
Most requests for assessment districts in recent years have been from
developers. They may own a large portion of the land involved, but
usually there are other benefited properties also. This was the case
in Sprucewood Glen and on Stellar. We should have a ready response to
' these people who will inquire about these funds.
Finally, I want to verify that this money (the $500,000 of get -aside
road grant) is not intended for gravel road assessment@. This was my
understanding of Council's intent. And, of course, in compliance with
-� - the grant, it won't be used for water and sower alone. That is why we
. rejected use of this money for the assessment petition on Govt. Lots
45 and 46, Sea. 34, which appeared earlier on the agenda.
i
1 i
1
i .
I
MEMO TO: William J. Brighton, City Manager
Kenai City Council
FROMt Charles A. Brown, Finance Director e y Q
DATEt September 25, 1985
SUBJECTS Airport Way Improvements
At the 9-23-85 workeession, we discussed financing of the proposed
improvements to Airport Way. Council desires to use Airport Land
System monies to finance 50% of those improvements. I said that per-
lwyr wo uuuld jumLlEy this use based upon Airport Way being the main
access to the Airport. I have now had time to research this question.
INC 7.30.030 (a) says, in effect, that all monies in the Airport Land
System shall be expended only for current expenses of the Airport Land
System, which include operating expenses, current maintenance charges,
upkeep and repairs, and all other expenses incident to the operation of
the Airport Land System. Note that construction costs are not
included.
Section 20 of Ordinance 99, which I believe has not been amended or
repealed, but is not in the City Code, says that excess funds in the
Airport Land System may be used to (1) redeem bonds, (2) improve or
restore the Terminal facility, or (3) for any other lawful purpose
relating to the Kenai Airport,
t find no other guidance relating to the use of these funds, including
the deeds from the Federal Govt. All we have, I believe, IS: the above
Icode and ordinance citations, along with sound accounting practices. '
One could argue that Airport Land System monies can not be used for
j construction unless it relates directly to the Airport. Now, we have
used Airport monies to develop new lands for leads. The argument is
that substantial lease or sale revenues will accrue to the Airport,
I thus justifying the expense. In effect, it's an Airport related
!
expense since its purpose is to provide substantial Airport revenue.
The facts in this case seem to bet
k
1) The improvements are on an existing dedicated right-of-way owned 1
by the General Fund, not the Airport. 1
2) It is a main access route to the Airport, but so is lililow Street,
and perhaps Main Street Loop.
3) The improvements will not provide new lands available for lease or
sale. They may, however, increase the value of lands on Airport
Way.
1
i
I
C I
r
i
J
1
F a
I
i _ -
t believe that the only possible argument to allow the use of Airport
monies on this project would be that it will increase the values of
leased lands and, therefore, at the redetermination dates of the
various leases, the rates will be higher than they otherwise would have
been.
About three -fourths of the lands are leased (the rest are sold). The
values of the leases lands total to $2,9249480. If we assume that
these improvements will increase the values by 101, then we will get
increased rent per year of 6% of that figure, or about $170500 per
year (after redeterminatione, which in some cases, are quite some time
away).
I do not see how this small amount of potential revenue could justify a
0200,000 or 0300#000 expenditure.
Perhaps the most important question ist Are we doing this work to
Improve the Airport or to improve a public right-of-way?
My conclusion is that it would be inappropriate to use any Airport Land
System money on this project. The ordinance will be drafted
accordingly.
H
T ,
2
r
Al/'_
C
Suggeated bys Administration
.CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 65-w
A RESOLUTION OF -THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION,
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CEMETERY.
WHEREAS, there is no clear sn'd distinguishable set of guidelines
applicable for the purpose of interment in the Kenai Municipal
Cemetery, and
WHEREAS, it is highly desirable that a set of rules be
established for a planned and orderly operation of said facility
from the standpoint of communications between bereaved families,
funeral directors and the municipality, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has a major responsibility in this
area, including but not limited to, the aesthetics of the
oemetery, maintenance and operation, accounting and
accountability and responsibility for providing access to the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following rules and regulations will
become effective upon the adoption of this resolutions
r
r
n,
ARTICLE It Administration
Section 1t The City of Kenai shall cause to be platted in
5' x 10' plots in those areas of the cemetery where interments
have not as yet taken place.
Section 2t The City Clerk shell be In nhnrgp and haves
access to said plate for the purpose of assigning plots upon
requeeta, and have charge of burial records, files and maps
which shell be stored by the City of Kenai. The City Clerk shall
charge a fee of $150.00 per plot.
Section 31 The Parke and Recreation Director and hie or her
designated representative shell enforce all cemetery regulations
and shell exclude from the cemetery any person violating them.
I
Section 4t The Clerk of the City ur Kenai shall maintain
necessary records, files and mope as required by the State to
protect the health and welfare of the community and to ensure
continuity in operation.
Section 51 The City of Kenai shell not be liable for any
order received verbally or for any mistake occurring from the
went of precise and proper instructions as to the particular
epece, size or location in a tract where interment is desired.
N
N
Section Hs The City of Kenai ahall take roananablo
precaution to protect all grave markorn within the Konni
Municipal Cemetery from loan or damage but expronoly dinclaime
any responsibility for loss or damage from caueen beyond ouch
reasonable precautions. Damages incurred directly or
collaterally and caused by or resulting from thieves, vandals,
malicious mischief, unavoidable accidents shall be excluded from
the City of Kenai's responsibilities.
Section 71 The City of Kenai reserves the right at any
time to enlarge, reduce, replat or change the boundaries or
grading of the City tracts in the Kenai Municipal Cemetery or any
part thereofl to modify or change location of or move or regrade
roede, drives or walks, or any pert thereof) to lay, maintain and
operate or alter or change pipelines or gutters or sprinkling
systems, drainage or otherwise.
Section 9s The City of Kenai reserves for itself the
perpetual right to ingress and egress over all plots for the
purpose of maintenance, operations or any emergency work
necessary to the operation of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery.
A
h
Y
i
1
ARTICLE Its Maintenance of Comotery.
Section 1s The City of Kenai is responsible for the
appearance of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery. The maintenance of
the cemetery shell be accomplished through a program administered
by the Parke and Recreation Department.
Section Zt The City of Kenai shall maintain the driveways,
gatee and fencing of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery and may close
such access facilities in periods of adverse conditions. ,
• Section_ 3s No trees, shrubbery, plants or turf shall be ,
planted, transplanted, plucked, picked or pruned within the Kenai
Municipal Cemetery without the written consent of the Parke and
Recreation Director or hie authorized rapreeentative. The City
of Kenei shell provide grass cutting at reasonable intervals,
raking, cleaning, grading and landscaping.
Sects 4s No enclosure of any kind, such no a fence,
coping, head or ditch shall be permitted around or about any
grave or burial lot and no burial lot shell be raised above the
established grave. Wooden benches, boxes, shelves, toys and
---- other articles upon a grave or burial lot shell not be permittod.
Temporary decorations are permitted during religious, national
and state holidays.
!4
7
Sectionys No material shell be nllowod to remain in the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery longer than in reasonably necessary for
any construction work. During periods of brook -up, no heavy
hauling will be permitted.
ARTICLE IIIs Use of Graves.
Sectio_n.1: Gravo propakaLluiis All oponinge, closing, plot
preparation, interments, disinterments and removals shall be
done by and at the expense of the funeral home conducting the
services and under the supervision of the Parke and Recreation
Director or his designee.
Sect, ion 2s Individual grove merkere. Types Only ground
love: merkere eat in a concrete base shell be used in the Kenai
Municipal Cemetery from the date of the adoption of these rules.
Section 31 -installation of grove markeres All foundations
for grove markers shell be installed at the heed of the grove by
and at the expense of the subject party. No more than one grave
marker per lot shell be allowed.
ARTICLE IVs Interment or Disinterment.
Section 1s The City Clerk shell assign a plot number to e
specific plot in advance of the preparation of a grave whenever
an interment or disinterment is to be made.
a
0
n
,
P
l
,�
Sectiooi 2: The City Clerk shall be provided with the
appropriate State burial and tranuit permits before interment
will be permitted. The burial late can be used for no other
purpose then interment.
Section 3: Interment or disinterment shell be made in
complianco with all Stato and City hoalth and oanitation laws.
ARTICLE V: Reservation permits and mortuary responsibilities.
•
Section 1: A reservation of burial apace in the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery can be acquired by applying to the City
Clerk and being assigned a platted plot or plots after having
paid the appropriate fee.
tb
Section A mortuary conducting a funeral service may
provide, place and remove greens, decorations or seating used for
a burial and must provide necessary lowering devices.
Sects 31 No person shall enter the Kenai Municipal _
Cemetery except through the established access routes. The
cemetery will be open daily from 7:00 a.m. to 900 p.m. during
the months of May through October. During the months of November
through April, the park will be open for burials only.
r
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this ** day of
*, 1985.
Tom Wagoner, Mayor
P
a� aJ
v �
f
CITY OF KENAI
Vd ealadw 4 4",F"
' MO PIDAL00 KQNAI, ALASKA 99611
TUIPMON120.7835
AMENDED AGENDA
KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
OCTOBER 299 1985
KENAI CITY HALL
/ ✓1 - EMT Needs of City
v 2 - 1986-87 Capital Improvement Projects
3 - Candlelight/Linwood Area
a. Roade, Water & Sewer down Swiree Rd. to New Elementary
School
b. Disposal of 200 ft. Tract by Golf Course
Co Easement Request, Burnett
S ✓4 - Rezone - Lawton Dr, Greenstrip
9. Pizza Hut
b. Devidhizer Land
c. Dust Bowl
g - Assessment Availability
3 ✓ 6 - Insurance - Airport
a. Stiffler, C-97 Plane
b. ERA
c. Kenai Aviation
7 - Cemetery
0 - Sale of Airport Lands
9 - Landscape Ordinance - Disc. Item - Council Approves, Board
Amend
s, W�hiicch� is Final?
/;,net Whelan
City Clerk
DATEDs October 24, 1985
Y
T
11
KENAI
MEDICAL
CENTER, INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 1390
September 23, 1985
L
rt : F PNI :' ,t :'• 1 Aa . .
KENAI, ALASKA 99611
f• � ti '1
Mr. William J. Brighton, City Manager
City of Kenai
P.B. Bux 598
Kenai, AK 99611
Re:,_ Update on.1mer9tncy Medical --Services for City of Kenai
Request to Meet with City "Coup` c_
Dear Mr. Brighton:
Monthly meetings have continued with the Kenai Fire Department
EMTs since my last update to you in December 1984. One-half day
training sessions have been held every three months with all the
EMT Its covering such areas as:
March 20, 1985 Emergency childbirth
June 19, 1985 Cardiac arrhythmias of all types
inciuding'diagnoses and treatment
September 18, 1985 Human systems and patient assess-
ments
An advanced cardiac life support class is intended to be taught
at the end of November 1986 with a general review of EMT II level
skills in preparation for the fireman taking their EMT II recer-
tification exam in December 1985.
A new fireman, Scott Walden, was recently hired as a replacement
for Ben Conaway and is currently working towards certification as
an EMT I. Scott is a fine individual but it concerns me we did
not hire a fireman who was an EMT III or a paramedic which we
need. I spoke with the Chief about this before Scott was hired.
Arrangements were made during May -June 1985 for EMT Ills to go to
Anchorage and spend several days working with an Anchorage shift
under the supervision and direction of Norm Miller in the
Anchorage Fire Department. However, Chief Winston informed me
the men would have to go on their own time since we did not have
EMTs for their replacement at work. Now we have one fewer EMT
IIIs...a total of 4 in our department.
IR
Sometime during November or December I would like to meet w
` Council either in a public meeting or better yet a work sess
to review the needs of the Kenai Fire Department's Emergei
Medical Services. Please let me know in advance a time when tl
would be appropriate.
Dennis Lovett recently completed his certification and licens
as a paramedic in the State of Alaska. I believe a letter
commendation to him from the City Council signed by the Ma;
would be very appropriate with positive reverberations occurr-
through other members of the Fire Department. This was a vole
i tary achievement on Dennis part.
I
Sincerely
Peter 0. Hansen, M.D.
PON:ht
cc: Tom Wagoner, Mayor
i
.z_
P.
KENAI
MEDICAL
j CENTER, INC.
• IBNLuItugUIWG
PUSS OFFICE W)X 1390
TO: Kenai City Council People
IMMUNE 20 4611
KFNA1. AASKA Wbi i
October 29, 1985
FROM: Peter 0. Hansen, M.D.
Medical Advisor
Kenai Fire Department EMS System
Dear Council:
'.,,Maving been appointed Medical Advisor to the Kenai Fire Department by
yourselves, I feel an obligation to meet with you at least once a year
and share some of the needs of Kenai's emergency medical service program.
I have nothing personal to gain by our discussion this evening other than
improved communications with you and making suggestions that will help us
to maintain and up grade our emergency medical services to the citizens
of Kenai.
During the past year the quality of our EMS has dropped off because of
inadequate experiences our EMT 3's need to keep up their. level of skill,
and because of a decreasing number of EMT 3's in the department. One
of our EMT 3's left the department resulting in our having a paramedic
and 3 EMT 31s; this level of staffing is not enough to maintain an EMT 3
or paramedic on every shift and provide for any vacation coverage, sick
leave or time away from the department for medical education.
Arrangements have been made for these individuals to spend time working
with Anchorage paramedic teams however none can leave the department
because of our short staffing. I believe each of you are aware that only
1n order to paramedic can treat a cardiac arrest with defibrillation;
proficiency in this, these fellows need to spend
time working with and communicating with other paramedic teams so they
will not only feel competent, but be competent in treating a cardiac
arrest.
Another example of our shortage of adequately trained personnel exists
now, with one of our EMT 3's on sick leave for the next two months and
another out of the state because of a family death.
r
9
r
L N'
`
d
The hiring of a new fireman last summer who was not an EMT hasn't helped.
Our community is growing and we need to be increasing the quality of
EMS care and not decreasing it.
It's myy suggestion to this Council that we need to increase the number
of fully trained EMT 3's or paramedics to provide at least one EMT 3
or paramedic on duty every shift, and in order to provide some on duty
time for training of these individuals which is required to be out of
'town from time to time. A reasonable goal would be for each of these
fellows to spend two weeks of work time a year riding with other paramedic
Leann fur Lice purpuse of up grading ski] Is that can not ae accomplished
In a classroom setting at the fire station.
'. his seems to boil down to three alternatives; hiring additional EMT 31s/
paramedics, giving greater incentives to encourage more of our EMT 2's
to become EMT 3's/paramedics, or replacing some of our current EMT 2's
with firemen trained at an EMT 3/paramedic level.
K
r
h
a
,I
0
0
✓+,,SOT �.l.
CITY OF KENAI
%Od Caj� 4 44m"
Y ,1 910 PIVAL00 KENAL ALABNA 00611
__ , s TELEPHONE 283. 7635
A&ELIAM
"INARY......,
MEMORANDUM
11 FROMs Keith Kornelis, Public Werka Dirwrttnr
City of Kenai
TOs Wm, J. Brighton, City Manager
City of Kenai
DATES October 23, 1985
REs SUMMARY Oi 85-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
($ x 1000) NCIL WORK SESSION OF
OCTOBER 22, 1985
I
(E) Robin, Kenaitze, Eagle Rock, Send Piper,
Tern, S. Strawberry - 0 f 270
(E) S. Spruce Street - Spur to Beaph -
P A Parking Lots $ 400
(E) Future LID (See Note) $ 410
Old Town - ROW + $ ISO
Airport Way - P (A.P. Triangle Landscape) $ 570
? (E) Cook Inlet View Drive do Lilac Lane a 500
e $2,300
NOTEs Future LID funds will be available only until April 1,
-- 1986. The extra funds not applied for with an LID request
by this date will be used for other CIP projects. The LID
funds are for the City's 50% match of paving projects for
existing accepted City streets that already have water and
sewer or where water and sewer is not anticipated in the
near future.
z
f
r
r.
'
PAN WIM
- - -
• CITY OF
KENAI
A-24 AT
310 PIDALOO UNAI• AL"KA 99611
- - -- T@LBPHON@363.7636
PRELIMm"INAR
MEMORANDUM
Y----
I
TOs
Bill Brighton, City Manager
FRUMs
Keith Kornella, Public Works UirOCtor
I
DATES
October 239 1905
SUBJECTS
1986-87 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PRIORITY
LIST
i
PRIORITY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ROUGH $ EST
N0.
...._._�
x 10000
1.
Community Center
4,500
2.
Harbor, Bulkhead, Dock, Barge
Facility do Fuel Facility
900
3.
Juliusoen, Beeinview, Ames
Barsbare, Angler - G
800
I
4.
Float Plane Basin
3,000 .
5.
VIP Subdivision - G
550
6,
Sewer Interceptor to Thompson
Perk
1,450
7.
Sewer within Thompson Perk
1,000
8.
Pioneer Home
State Fund
9.
Spur Highway - 4 Lanes, Soldotna
to Kenai - P
State Fund
Juvenile Detention Center
State Fund
11.
Beaver Creek Fire Station
300
12.
Kiana, Colonial h Steelhead - G
450
} 13.
Riverview, Mission, Upland,
Overland, Highland, etc. Old
Town - P
550
P
r
h
U
14.
�r
15,
0 16.
17,
18,
19,
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
i
Wildweod P
000 i
N. Spruce, Second 6 Third - P
900
a
Trading Bay .. p
250
Candlelight 6 Linwood Area
(LACK) - P
600
let, 2nd & 3rd (East of Forest)
G 6 P
550
Cohoe A Coral Street - G
300
Heller, Evergreen, McKinley
(HEM) - P
ayn
Extend N. Taxiway Airport - P
10750
Airport Runway Extension
5,500
Addition to City Hall
800
RV Camper Park
200
Aspen 6 Fifth - G
500
P
ti
r,
_ is
MEMORANDUM
r,
TOs Keith Kornelia, Public Works Diructor
FROMs Jack LaShot, City Engineer
DATEs October 23, 1985
SUBJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Wildwood Drive Reconstruct
a My Limits)
�iMrwwi rw��na+r�inM And widen
(no curb or gutter)
2340 LF 0 $100/LF $2349000
Sewer reconstruct (30 years old)
2300 LF 0 $70/LF $1610000
Sewer and Water Services
36 Sets 0 $1,800/Set $ 64_,800
$4590800
Engineering, Inspection, Management,
Surveying • 20% $ 91,960
Contingency - 10% $ 45,980
r
$59_7_
ADDITIONS
Curb & Gutter
2340 LF 0 $30/LF
Storm Drainagge Line
2400 LF 0 i30/LF
Engineering, Inspection, Management,
Surveying - 20%
Contingency • 100
JL/sw
r
ll
$ 70,200
$ 72,000
$142, 200
$ 28,440
$ 14.200
...E 640
/-
.,
t .
d • r
U
I
- mod• _ - � �- � -- _ -- _ - .
log, .
CITY OF KENAI
"All of ff""a"
210 NVAL00 K/NAI, ALAOKA W11
T1LVN0N100! • 7e80
IL fil
MEMORANDUM
TO; 11cith 1(ornollo, f ubiic Waika 8itcuLur
1 P
FROMs Jack La Shot, City Engineer �A O so
OATEs October 249 1905 F0 G0 pit;
SUBJECTs CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SILVER SALMON - Spur to Highland Trailer Pork
1300 LF strip paving reconstruct 0 $100/LF $1300000
Engineering, Inepection, Surveying, do
Management - 25% $ 329000
Contingency $ 26,000
$188,000
WATER LINE to North City Limits
4200 LF 0 $60/LF $336,000
Engineering, Inspection, Surveying, do
Management - 25% $ 84,000
Contingency - 20% $ 67 000
$487,000
COMPLETE 5TH STREET Paving
1000 LF 0 $60/LF $ 60,000
Engineering, Inepection, Surveying, 6
Management - 250 $ 150000
Contingency- 25% $ 1500On
JL/aw
r
$ 90,000
Y -
H
wmmlmw
S 090 50' 1 F 3 2 5 A L I A K
base alot"19 flam Or 0 CON "'I 8WO-11—ro—wo-I
3.1, 4.
1904
P.
P. ILIMINARY
0
CORNER
OORIS OR
911801VISION
w
0
-OLAFINEY
Suect,
1904 PRELIMINARY
CONNYBROCK - BRANNIGAN 41fAn
S890544 1 -66 i. Ol
11905V 45"t - is 1 l5l 4 90'45"9 - S 3 1
2 6',
-so I . ?a,- 23'— -
—,
lot,
r0RmEFjj.*j
ELL.M. L T-98
G.L.14. 1.0T-911 1.0T. IS)o
a
Z.
02
17,84 wood 2" 9 4.
,, lood L-9411/16-29
loplosed Oval
600080.
w
SWIRES ELEMENTRY
w
TRACT-1
O'LA LOT-101
13. 507 Am. 9
Vl
cn
ch
w
UP
61
0
at
Cl)
0
W
ta
to
4
0
Al
0,L.M. LOT-i2o
O
613 is'
NANNII 9 T R E E T 130,0/w)
9 99059' Is w 1328
9 so -Tq"—f IS w - 6(, 3 15
3,
1/16 cap
subdivided
1 � , . •
Wrr •.
3A ~
7 � "— •I BOX 890 • 80LDOTNA. ALASKA 99660
' PHONE 262.4441 ...,..
�"' '''� ^1 • A /�.(( STAN THOMPSON
MAYOR
April 3, 1985 �n,567,',,�
-Aa#,0O A. OiP O F f
Dill Brighton
City Manager �.'•. '�'<'
City of Kenai FOR couNca .eeBrstsa OF w!7-Ys
P.O* Box •W C.tr. .nor. •_:] murnw
Kenai, AK 99611 X�C osa 1works MY Chrk
Fin
Re: New Kenai ElementarySchool �o.# •ylnmsud ew•
Coknen tiK p'so puss
Dear Bills
The Kenai Peninsula Borough is currently preparing the budget for
the above project for the bond issue in October. We need to know
the costs the City may charge the Borough for water and sewer
extensions. As I see it there exists four possible approaches
the City may take to provide the service.
1. Extend the lines the minimum length necessary along Swires
Street and charge the Borough as a connection fee if this is
legal under your ordinances.
2. Extend the lines the minimum length necessary down Swires
Street with no charge to the Borough.
3. Establish an L.I.D. and extend the water and sewer lines the
full length of Swires Street with the Borough paying 50% of
the costs. This would serve a long range solution for this
area.
4. Work a deal with the developer of Donnybrook - Brannigan
subdivision and extend the water and sewer lines down
_ Brannigan Circle then along a lot line to our structure.
The division of costs to be mutually agreed upon by all
Parties concerned in the extension.
I vie would appreciate a definitive answer no later than June 18 to
j
include the necessary costs in the bond issue proposal.
! Also, on the matter of Swires Street, it has been Borough's
policy to request the upgrade of City streets to new schools.
i
-- A
I
f
I
i
{
r
Page ( 2 )
April 3, 1985
Letter to Bill Brighton
We would appreciate it if Swires Street could be placod in your
capital construction budget. The school is projected to open the
fall of 1987. Thank you for your efforts should you have
questions, please call.
Sincerely,
W A",. h
William J. nye
Borough En i eer
WJC/dlm
•
P
r
(E3
CITY OF KENAI
„odCapiW44"„
910 PIDAL00 KSNAI, ALASKA 99511
TSLSPMONS263.7636
May 10, 1985
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Attentions William J. Conyers, Borough Engineer
Box 850
Soldotna, Alaska 99669
Res New Kenai Elementary School on Swires Road
Dear Mr. Conyers:
Kenai's City Manager, Wm. J. Brighton, has asked me to respond to
your letter dated, April 3, 1985, concerning the future Kenai
Elementary School located on Swires Road. A copy of this letter
was given to the Council of the City of Kenai for their April 179
1985 Council Meeting. After some discussion concerning your
letter, the Council directed me to forward their response.
The Kenai City Council suggests that the Kenai Peninsula Borough
include all costs for water, sewer, drainage, coed, sidewalks,
lighting, etc. to the school in the bond issue proposal. Because
of the high water table in this area, I would estimate that the
main water and sewer lines would run approximately $110 per
lineal foot. The new road or extension of Swires Road south from
Ecet Aliak could be estimated at approximately $75 per lineal
foot. Since the City of Kenai will be upgrading Swires Road from
the Spur Highway to East Aliak, that construction cost would not
have to be included in the bond issue. If the Kenai Peninsula
Borough wishes to pave, the cost for paving from the Spur Highway
to the proposed school should also be included in the bond issue.
A rough cost estimate for constructing curbs and gutters is
approximately $15 per lineal foot while paving could cost
$9 - $10 per square yard.
i 3 q -w
•
MEXIORANDUM - -
C-3142
A
DATE: June o 1985 �0
TO: Tom Overman, KPB/SD Associate Superintendent
ra �0
�,•' K°P� 4°grin nt '� 1
FROM:.��'" 4 Doug Grant, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: "DO" Budget Analysis (615186) \
KENAI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
The following explains how the updated design development Statements
of Probable Cost (616166) were prepared. Basically, the Architect's
Design Development ("DD") cost estimate was used as the building
construction cost. Two major changes have been made since the
schematic design phase: (1) Site Development costs have been
separated from Building Construction costs and (2) estimated costs
have been included for Offsite Utilities.
We have also outlined the budget ramifications which may result from
sharing some of the Offsite Utility costs with the City of Kenai.
PART ONE
Line I.C. SITE DEVELOPMENT
Line I.D.
Line II.A
Line III.A
Total (per A/E) $725,660
Deduct Entrance Canopy - 53 210
Subtotal 072;440
add - Gen. Cond. 0 12% + 80,693
add - Design. Conting. 0 2.6% + 18,828
add - Escalation 0 4% + 30.878
550Z,839 use
$802,900
CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY
Use 6%
A/E FEES'
"DD" budget reflects actual per contract.
OFFSITE UTILITIES (per M-K estimates)
1. Sanitary Sewer Extension
S 63,700
2. Domestic Water Extension
33,000
3. Natural Gas Extension
1,000
4. Gravel roadwork on Swires
from E. AlIak to site.
(965 LF 0 $50.00/LF)
4
Subtotal
1145,9W
r
r
v 4
rage Iwo
MEMO - Tom Overman, KPB/SD
"OD" Budget Analysis (6/6/86)
KENAI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
i June 6, 1985
add - Design for the above 0 10%
$ 16,000
add - Inspec, Testing, Admin. 0 8%
12,000
add - Conting. b Escal. 0 16%
Round Total
27.000
1200,000
6: Primary Power Extenslon(3 phases)
- 40 000
grand TOTAL
*z4u:uuu
PROJECT CONTINGENCY
Use 5%
*** SPECIAL NOTE***
If N1kisk1
Elementary School Id approved for 20 classrooms,
then both
A/E Fees
and PMC Fees are to be equally divided between the two
projects..
Budget figure changes are as follows;
Line II.A
A/E FEES
FIXED FEE changes to
$276,177
REIMBURSABLES changes to
168,460
Line II.B
PMC FEES
FIXED FEE changes to
173,700
REIMBURSABLES changes to
271,600
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
changes to
919,137
SUBTOTAL PROJECT COSTS
changes to
80096,037
PROJECT CONTINGENCY
changes to
404,763
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
changes to
8,499,800
r
�s+i®WAN
3A-�o
d
I
{� Page Three
14EMO - Tom Overman, KPB/SD
j "DO" Budget Analysis (6/5/85)
' KENAI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
June 6, 1985
PART 2
OFFSITE UTILITIES
A. SWIRES ROAD UPGRADE WAVING & 50/50 PARTICIPATION
WITH KENAI
-CITY.
Assumptions
1.Owner incurs 100% of sewer, water & gas
extensions
2. Owner incurs 100% of design, inspection,
$97,700
testing, admin. and contingencies for
sewer, water A gas.
32 300
,. TOTAL
tT;II83
Roadwork
1".—Upgrade 965 LF @ $75.00/LF
$73,126
2. Paving 2,800 SY @ $10.00/SY
'
28 000
Add 33% for Design, Etc. Subtotal
3'
376
Subtotal
�'33
Divided b 2 ■
y Cost to Borough
Bottom Line Difference (includes S% Project
j Contingency) Add to TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
S 9,000
B. 60/50 Cost Participation w/City of Kenai
(water, sewer, road w/paving)
I. Water
` 2. Sewer
S 33,000
f 3. Paved Road
63,100
13 0
Subtotal
' Add 33q
`
7 7.000
TOTAL
�. Divide by 2 (Borough's Share)
164.100
add - Natural Gas
1,000
add - Primary Power
4400 000
- s - - - TOTAL
_ Bottom Line Difference (includes 5% Project
Conting.) Deduct from Total Project Costs
$-47,145
i
�. cc: E. Hakert, KPB/DPW
K. Brown, KPB/DPW
D. McCloud, KPB/DPW
L. Cash, 'Hi rum Cash
i
file: 9-2.39, .'
H
.I
i
i
D
. diem j -4 Easemeolf" Zy".� -
(ED
96F
E,w TRI
fiAu Fift.0
• EX19FIN6
BORROW
jor
Lor o
........... .........
L
IiA
10 %VArf:Q
IN
11
V-- --- IT
r HA,.I, rWIV }! SEGTIUPI
'��►It1� /� ;� 731'Jf RIIW S.M.
i. E19TING '1
BORROW '
r
91Ti
r or
14
MARSH
0 wwr�A 'SatSLL �.�A.G` 1 r!r. rr•�ry
M pis OoyfeM `.1.4.vhvION
%/ Suvsaa ARa�
LEUI. fE.QrrW)rI0N
GOV'T L0f9 me.3 and 4 SECTION ! T9Nmm
9M. AN CULCOW THE NW1/4 GOV'f Lor4
CONTAING 150 AC. M/L .
' " 4
r.
6i
f«�j rpL 1
'.rfarV�fVAa�i►t C�tff�1lt+iL�ffl�if y.'��'Affri"•f7�A•j� �tr,+A�i�+A�rfAa�+f1f174 41f•L f7rfrjifIAf►rI►f r Va AY•9iir►�1I•a 'Y+�Yf"Ya►
• q rf1
IY •Ltf►IAfA�r0Pop
/4V►fV►aLfraar
a fatfa r:+f 9LYo
f•f Itaf�itatfs►af1ff.ajp
�llyfLa114690r0iVA�1±1 r:�V06490.6 •fVarjrtl
fb �y+vifffi•fLAfr`+ir•Lfa+a+r4fr
ffVfiir6946A6 1AyL+ f 1
V af•a YagOslo
aa•4y LI1,404AI/
+Ark.+aJL VA jrA ra lly ai +V0�L� LVL ►YY�r�I
�,►,Y AV 141..'. aA air. rf_
rak m I rs IT ai��i
I��As• A•MO
CoNlt�ss�iwl AREA
faf� v•
38-a
,
i
r
1
�
j
����� : S%/������t r�c,� Z• i� 2 D' �/ ul R 9TRIVp
P)
NAl 1. Issd 10 i% "� • r• y�rC11A,4'%1/,ya a�.�' r� 00
�t�r� �' t ••i• A YA"�o Arts �"r�j��A r•A
r f fffiii��� Vr
raft I�aj�•,�r61• r�'AiA-19
• • f r f 1 Y •
• A I IarAa " ra I
/;� 191f1.f fV,AAYAy•Yy+�a�;j
' • / ♦"t rA "YI I Y Aa "v t•r♦f YIr Ar•v / I / I �� �.•'' r��Af aA ♦�•VrA yrr,�•Ar•�•♦I• %I/ 1/
r r� Iva l• 1.L f 6 �T• rrla4 �. / tor J i wrl
.. �;%',, ••f+Aar I 7r Air r �I:Y� A • • A♦r r r
/ ;-•' rf f►�Trrt► ►r '�vraafA•rrfa
,w FI it I6;Arf• aft► ry • • YYYr Afa•
i :iri�r�9'f Aar.•i1 �ar� ari r•• �. v�r �a 'af"air+ k*r.A /
i
so I c or co
MARSII •~ti p
m
yIVA
cn
„t, � • 6 ww•sB 'vww%.L 5urvvv l.ocgrsurl
r• .•t:.Ar A Pt• Oa••or� i.t.rzvM10N � 1� �
%/ 6�c•ea p1•S�A
• � era►. cF�• r rr�r�nN
wit 1� 1 s loir
...
9M'fAN EKULONGd/NENwiI4coov'r LO/41/W `9��'e 0�' •e0� ;
�;ONr4lAf6 190 AC. M/L . AKvA
' •y A r�A r '
t
i
1
1
I
F
4
t r
h
t
,
•
i
s
1
[ - -1
IT
Box 1022
Kenai, Alaska 9961 ,' aualess,
August 5, 1985 £, �A J��•�
�� CiSY iAlA► c o.CM1 Of KtNql
Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager
City of Kenai
210 Fidalgo
Kenai, Alaska 99611
RE: Access to 80 Acres at end of Candlelight Cxtended
Dear Mr. Brighton:
Mr. Dick Morgan has advised us that he. now holds from the City
of Kenai a signed option to lease adjacent land which will encompass
Candlelight Extended for purposes of enlarging the 9-hole golf course
which is currently under construction into an 18-hole course. He
plans to exercise this option in the spring of 1987.
When Mr. Morgan exercises his option, it will eleminate the access
to our property currently provided by Candlelight Extended, and
officially granted to us by ordinance 870-83. In conversations with
City personnel) it has been suggested that the section line be considered
our access. This matter was raised prior to the passing of 870-839 and
at that time this access was shown to be void as the section line
enters the wetlands long before it reaches our property.
As we are currently in process of re -designing our subdivision of
this property, it is imperative that the question of permanent access
be resolved as soon as possible. We appreciate your efforts in expediting
this matter.
Very truly yours,
Ji 1 W. Burnett
M
}
r,
1
r -
4
C C7,,�,: a
Suggested bys Administration
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE NO. 670-83
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC USE EASEMENT ALONG CANDLELIGHT DRIVE
EXTENSION THROUGH CITY -OWNED LANDS.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a grant of access
and maintenance along Candlelight Drive Extension through
City -owned park and recreation lands described as Government Lot
3, Section 3, T5N, R11Wt SM, and
WHEREAS, Candlelight Drive Extension is an existing roadway of
one -quarter mile in length, is not constructed to City
specifications and receives minimal City maintenance, and
WHEREAS, said roadway provides the physical, but not legal
acceea, to the adjacent 80 acre tract to the south, and
WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission recom-
mended that a public use easement be granted along Candlelight
Drive Extended at their meeting of May 25, 1983, and
WHEREAS, an appropriate easement width of sixty feet would
accommodate the existing roadway as well as present and future
utility construction, and
WHEREAS, Kenai Municipal Code Sections 22.05.010, 22.05.0209 and
22.05.050 require that a public use easement be established by
the City Council by ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF j
KENAI, ALASKA that a sixty foot public use easement be es-
tablished along Candlelight Drive Extension through City -owned
lands described as Government Lot 39 Section 3, T5N, R11W, S.M.,
sub Jact to permission from approcriste federal a encies.
rurtnermarep Ine My enssnall not 301100 e r the
upgrading and maintenance of said easement unless authorized by
Council, not costa of perfecting this easement.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AI, ALASKA, this 17th day
of August, 1983. q)
x
ONg MAYOR
ATTESTs
3,anet Whelan, City Clark
First Readings June 1, 1983 '
Second Readings August 17, 1963
Effective Dates September 17, 1983
r
9 ,
ry
i
(
i
R
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
JULY 6, 1997
Page 3
C PUBLIC HEARINGS
C-1 Ordinance 863-63 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Adding
Utility Locations Within the City,
a Right-of-Waye
MO110N, Postponements
Councilwomen Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Wagoner, -to
postpone action till the Aug. 3, 1961 meeting.
There was no public comment on the ordinance.
Motion paacod by unanimous consent.
C-Z Ordinance 870.63 - Establishing a Public Use Easement Along
Candlelight Drive Extension through City -Owned Lands
MOTION$
Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilwomen Bellie,
to adopt the ordinance.
City Manager Brighton explainedp this has been considered by
the Recreation Commission. The street divides a
�ark -designated property. Administration recommends the
ouncil do nothing with the road regarding an assement, but
the developer be allowed to use the road. By giving an
ossement, It could never be used an one unit. Councilman
Viso asked If there was an sesement, City Manager Brighton
replied no. Councilman Nine asked, how does the power line
go down? Mr. Brighton ropliad, it is for utilities, it is
doeigned for a rood and lust used that way. Public Noeka
Director Kornelis sold there to no recorded easement that he
to aware of.
PUBLIC COMMENT$
of Jill Burnett. There srs power and phone lines there.
The road has been in use for 13 yesre, and has been
maintained for snow removal. Mr. Kornelis said for 3
or 4 years the City entered Into the pit there, but
that was not for down the road. It has not been used
since. There to no access to the pit now.
developer is making across, it may have been maintainedof
for a short time. City Manager Brighton exploinod it
to not Adminislen!!onIs intent to preclude the owner
from using the street, but if Council gives an
@@moment, it cannot be joined at a future date.
b. Recreation Commissioner Hanson. This will be a widely
used area in the future. It to ideal for cross-country
skiing. The Recreation Commission has no objection to
permissive use by Mr. Burnett without ••a easement.
They asked Atty. Rogers to review if it had been used
for easements, it appears it has been used primarily by
the City. If the road to allowed to be continued to be
used, it could be theirs. There is access to the
property where s road could be built. Councilmen
Wagoner suggested the City look at the feasibility of
re -platting to put the park at one side or the other.
c. Jill Burnett. the road referred to that could be
developed to just a cow -path. It would cost much to
develop. for them to be provided only temporary access
would be unostinfeotory. It is imperative they have
something permanent. The read has been used for 15
years, there wen a family there originally. Councilman
Mice said the gully that bisects the land is fairly
deep. Councilwoman Glick @aid this is the old Melon
Jones property. There may be prescriptive rights
I
P
I
0
CITY OF KENAI
tod 0a�z" 4 4"a I f
I. 0. /0X 510 KINAI. AtAINA 99611
TItI/140141 211 - )//1
August 17, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO$ lie
FRO ��im Rogers, City Attorney
REs Right to Access on Candlelight Drive Extension
A review of the low and purported authority presented by the
Burnett's attorney's opinion dated August 12, 1983. Nona of
the information presented overcomes the prohibition
against acquiring property of a municipality. Alaska Statutes •
29#73.030 provides ae follows: ...
A home rule or general low municipality may not be divested
of title to real property by adverse possosaion.
Neither is it possible for a private landowner to prescribe
against the United States, the City's predecessor in titles
An occupant of land cannot hold adversely while he admits
the title to be in the United States. wee Conool. Mining
Co. v. longatedt, 126 F. 124.
The 8urnetta' latter cites the City of Anchorage vs. Neobott, 530
P.2d 1324, to suggest that the low of prescriptive oneemonts
applies to municipalities. The case does not support this
conclusion. The case does not concern prescription against
municipal or state property.
The 8urnette oleo cite Washburn vs. Esser, 511 P.2d
1387, to support the conclusion MOT—= ty, once it provides
road maintenance, cannot later deny the use of a road.
The Washhurn case does not apply to citiao, but
rather was a suit between two private land o wnero.
They also rely on State Highway Commissnion vo. Dnnnevik,
447 P.2d 510, no hoidinq that the grant or a r1gh -et-way is an
easement which is a privilege to use the land for highway
purposes. The Onnnevik cane concerns the state trying to gain
prescription of and tar its owl' purpautin. The coati don" cite
the definition that the grant of right-nf-way to an easement, but
no proscription was awarded in the cone.
1.
.
f
Second, they saoumo that the City has dodicntod Candlelight Drive
Extension as a city street. Candlelight Drive Extonsion has
never boon dodicntod as n at•root and there is no record of an
easement given by the fit t
y e anyane.
Third, th8 memo also assumes that the Burnette have no other
access to their property. This is not true. The Burnotto have
access alonq a more circuitous route and, furthermore$ they are
charged with the knowledge that they did not have a permanent
easement when they bought the property.
Fourth, the Burnetta' predecessor in title, Helen Jonea, was
never given a written easement. This precludes the Burnotte from
asserting rrescription by seven years of use. Raby__v. Hill 11
Alaska 600. -- -
Finally, when the property woe made a park in 1980 the following
restriction woe made by the State'Department of Natural
Resourcest
he property hoe been dedicated to outdoor recreation
through the land and water conservation fund and cannot be
converted to other than public outdoor recreation use
without the writtaw�en approval of the Secretaryof the
nterior.
TR/dg
_
H
i.
Ij
I
Gil.
I.
-Tv- Par '- 1
A,
U
zz
r
,
• � ' 1 � ►, rW i(� ',S• r11 ' t • �
/; �,i; /• , t��/���) , ? / UU// 11 /6t111P �.'��
ii f J,..i:YI, �•.1:t.f. • �:TSL'' t �.1( �•/J.L%. J�L/'L /l�G!IV SIOW.
tire
•,. ♦bl .. is / /' •I.�l io i • • :I." 1 / % to, I '7 ' loll ,.,
11Mi 11�••..n • •1 ; .�� r► it // w... , f.J r Fr r,IIs
�• il:l 11 'i7 1
i
1� Y • 1'(llf•, ' �N
!A 4-0'I f, '
f/fgtl q •"�J 1:
,, '.ut •'� ,�
<'• / .r
w .^fee 1014L ?".@w.• 1f4Mfulf � µ / � ' ,w '�• i'1 1,.
�T f 1 11 a: ty r t
• PU Pr//.,h i•1.4v1►f'ION F 171 ►. �.I Sr i:1' ,• � f�
•. �ul/t4 PR�A ,t• hl f•f i C7 ,L rnj !y•r•. ' '•
r sl fu f' !1►
L E'�M7. t E�:IitPTtOII f •,' •+ . "„; r, 1, ,►. , �, .
hS I:r:•�, rf' ' ,
6,1V'1 toll 7.1,1 or01 •[Cl,ollI I9N,RIIW 1 I" [4I/A/A/[0'60N/AAgMOWNJ(1'AO. �, o
4 ,M Ai [ /Ct toild ►f•L %N,,•I tf0o'I L0I 4 a 10' IN►[RVAL P
•.0111A•VG MAC MIL, f
r / NO /ILLO WRY[% WA! AIAO[ INJ! OAK .
•1: r, r � I r,,
P.
r
kol I r ur- KLIVAI
BORROW SITE NO. I f
ft"Oolej Io, MY o, I11141
no 004, soo
f1R9, 149 97611 ,+
l•
October 17, 1985
Karani, Inc.
611 W. Tudor Road
Anchorage, Ak.'99503
Dear Sir,
Enclosed is a map showing the demensiong of the land at the
corner if Walker Lane and the Spur Highway that you wish to
acquire.
An artist rendition showing location of the building and the
landscaping would be helpful in showing the City Council and
the people of the neighborhood that you do not intend to turn
this green area into a concrete slab. As per our telephone
conversation I would suggest holding as many trees as possi-
ble on the area facing Lawton Ave. The entrance from the Spur
Highway should be at the very minimum, 200 ft. from the inter-
section of Walker Lane and the Spur Highway.
I will convey your comittment of *59 of your total investment,
land and building, to be used in landscaping of the area.
The workshop for the City Council, on your request is on Oct-
ober 29, 1985 with the City Council meeting the following
night. I would appreciate having the artist rendition in my
office prior to these dates.
Sincerely,
R. L. (Bob) NATH
Associate Broker
RLN:jc
%V011D, INC.
�~ in ' , . . AI.µ �.. ..ter • � .
P
It
r
9
S
L... - - 11hi - - . - - - - - -----____ ----- -
rz
CITY OF KENAI
eapdal 4 4"
210 PIDALOO KENAI, Aug" o0011
TELEPHONE 303.7036
October 3, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TOt Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning.Commiesion
FROMt Done Qerstlauer, Administrative Assistant
RE1 Rezoning/Replat Lawton Acres
The City of Kenai hob been approached by two individuals who have
an interest in purchasing property along the Spur Highway between
Welker Lane and Rogers Road.
The first individual Is requesting the corner lot for the purpose
of building a Pizza Hut and would require approximately one Bore
of land.
The second party is requesting two acres next to the corner
requested by Pizza Hut for the purpose of building a medical
clinic.
This property is currently zoned for conservation, the requests
would require a general commercial zone.
/d
r.
C
I
T IT
32 33
PAS 11 Arlc%.fj&3
0. V.Sst"WONAw
40t.7- ? w*tj
TAT ( 07
Ill
i
00 .0-W T,
f
_ 4 I ily... I t' �1_.. '1'r'I } li-f11���4'�i I t�hl;ir i7 ;�1`` . ;�•.
1
6
•14 y .IrI
''.�..,dtilf�t'.t�.
t p�•:f•
t{i�
E ip
f
1
Ob
{ 1 •,.� _mil � �{�,,, ,, , ,r r,,7, ,
., t',.��i-.qua., a,, ,.t. l;+:f �1 ,r,la• � fj a.- i .
El
i))
TCL
1
IA
4
1% All
fo
Co4woopr
4 0440M CPA49 I
El
Am
000�l
LAWTON " AC
fil
g#4
I ea
ce
V
771-
7 h I
F'T
.0- 1 77
r i I
E&
~.
-
~ . �
�
VAL
nk
-"«
60
Old
'
it
NN
� NN
L• 31.31 "
� u L - 31.46'
Y Y
N M
NOTE
A 1' road oao#manl along Iba aoalb boundary of all 1*16
1
S I
N
b
K
W W
w Z
49 3 J
LAW TON
.. _ _ _ NU•t uq
MEMO TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director ea Q
DATE: September 24, 1985
SUBJECT: Assessments
At last night's workeession, the subject of using $500,000 of the $2.3
million grant for matching money on assessment districts was discussed.
We will earmark this money for assessment districts. However, at some
point, the Administration will need specific guidelines on how to
advise the public of the availability of these funds.
Council agreed that it would be used to match against a SOX assessment
for paving projects. We have authorized/unissued bonds of $1,150,000,
of which $340,000 should be sold for the Aliak/McCollum project. That
leaves $810,000 of available bonds for advance financing of the
assessed portion.
The questions to be considered are:
1) if water and/or sewer services are requested in conjunction with
paving, shall those services also be available for the 502
assessment ratio?
2) if a developer/subdivider requests a 50% assessment district, are
these funds available to him?
3) If Council wishes to exclude developers, which seems to be the
precedent set (i.e., inlet Woods, Sprucewood Glen, Stellar), how
do we identify a developer? A party that owns 20% of the land in
a proposed district? How about SOX?
Most requests for assessment districts in recent years have been from
developers. They may own a large portion of the land involved, but
usually there are other benefited properties also. This was the case
in Sprucewood Glen and on Stellar. We should have a ready response to
these people who will inquire about these funds.
Finally, I want to verify that this money (the $500,000 of set -aside
road grant) is not intended for gravel road assessments. This was my
understanding of Council's intent. And, of course, in compliance with
the grant, it won't be used for water and sewer alone. That is why we
rejected use of this money for the assessment petition on Govt. Lots
45 and 46, Sec. 34, which appeared earlier on the agenda.
r
H
r
0
L�
i
SugtJostod by: Council
CI1Y OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 84-129
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
ESTABLISHING A POLICY REGARDING PARTIAL ASSESSMENT FOR ROAD
PAVING, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, the Council desires to increase the number of projects
that can bo cunaL►ucLeJ using yranL wuniut, LhaL aru uwNuuLuL1 Lu
be received from the State of Alaska, and
WHEREAS, assessing benefitted property owners fifty percent of
the costs of certain types of improvements that the
Council desires to be constructed will allow the grant monies to
be used for more projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following policy be established as
direction to the City Administration and information to the
citizens of Kenai:
1. Following petition from the benefitted property owners,
pursuant to Title 16 of the Kenai City Code, the City will
consider assessing the owners fifty percent of the costs of road
paving improvements for those projects that are included in the
City's adopted capital improvement list for gravel or paving road
improvement. Gravel road improvements on the capital improvement
list may be accomplished totally with grant monies without
assessment.
2. Following petition from the benefitted property owners,
pursuant to Title 16 of the Kenai City Code, the City will
consider assessing the owners fifty percent of the costs of water
and/or sewer improvements for those projects that are included in
the City's adopted capital improvement list for road or water or
sewer improvement.
3. If proper petitions, as discussed in paragraphs #1 and
Ill above, are not received in a timely manner, the projects will
be subject to deletion from the capital improvement list.
4. The City intends to use available grant monies for the
non -assessed portion of the projects until such grant monies are
depleted. After the grant monies are depleted, the City intends
to assess 100% of the project costs.
r
5. The City intenda to allocate ita grant monion boned
upon the relative priority outabiishod in ito capital improvement
list, rather than on a first come -first served basis.
6. It remains the City'a Policy that, in all cases other
than those outlined above, the City assess 100% of project costs in approved assessment districts.
7. All assessments are subject to availability of
financing of both the assessed and non -assessed portions of the
projects.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 17th day
of October, 1984.
Tom Wagoner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janet Whelant City Clerk
r
0
2
A
MEMO TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Charles A. Brown
CUEJ£C'f: 11sN: a&uitiACtiiC�csovluLiuu v u4-129
DATE: October 12, 1984
S- y'
CITY OF KENAI
110d (?apiW 4 4ia"alf
210 PIOAL00 KENAI, ALASKA 88811
TELEPHONE 283. 7635
I have drafted the above resolution to reflect the decisions that came
from last Tuesday's workeession. I think it's important that Council
realize what this says. Assuming you adopt and follow this policy it
means that:
1) Only gravel road improvements (along with things like public
buildings) will be done without assessment.
2) The people must pay 50% of any paving or water and sewer
improvement, assuming it's on the list. If it's not on the
list, they'll pay 100%. Also, if its on the list for water
and sewer only, and they want any road work, they'll pay 100%
of the road work.
3) If Council desires to perform work on the CID list (let's say
pave a road, or lay a water line) and we don't get a proper
petition from the property owners, you can't do it. This
would be the case for both commercial and res dential
property.
4) If a project (let's say a waterline - how about to a car
dealership) is not on your list, you can't do it, unless
we have a 100% assessment.
I've discussed this with many City employees. My recommendation to
you is to fail this resolution. Don't set a formal policy.
r
9
f�
r�
Walters & nlsnn, Inc.
insurance
10809 Kenai Spur Hwy.
October 29. 1985
6
ANY m
Konai, Ak. 99611
Telex 25.249
907.283.5116
Tim Rogers
City Attorney
City of Kenai
210 I:idaLgo AVG.
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Rot Airport Terminal be46e Insurance
Dent Tims
Confirming our conversation of October 22, 1989, it is my
belief that the most important issue :s to rcquirc that all
air carriers operating out of the Kenai Terminal agree to
hold the City of Kenai harmless and indemnify them for any
claim arising out of the loading or unloading of passengers
and Cargo and any claim arising while an aircraft is in
flight or motion. The City of Kenai should be named onto the
aviation liability policy of each terminal lease operator as
additional insureds.
The City of Kenai presently requires all lassoes to provide
evidence of insurance. It would still be in the City's best
interest to require that the airport terminal lease holders
provide a certificate of insurance reflecting comprehensive
general liability, commercial auto liability and workers'
compensation. The decision whether or not to include the
full indemnifiction clause and hold harmless will ultimately
be decided by economic and political factors. It is
Impossible at this time to put a direct cost on the increase
in premium to the City of Kenai Airport primary and excess
liability policies without going into the marketplace. Given
the present c0 otic state of the marketplace, I do not feel
that it would be in the City's best interest to do so at this
point in time.
Please let me know if I may be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
C
Kurt 9. Olson
ay
d
,
CITY OF KENAI
%Od eap" 4 4"
310 PIDALaO KENAI, AWMA 09611
TELEPMON8003. MIS
October 29, 1985
Mr. Phil Stiffler
205 Linwood Avenue
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Res Leese of Airport Tie -Down for Transport Plane
Dear Mr. Stifflers
On Tuesday, October 22, 1985 you telephoned this office asking to
speak to either myself or the legal assistant regarding insurance
for your plane. At that time, neither the legal assistant or I
was available.
My understanding from talkinq to the secretary is that you wanted
dollar figures for how much insurance you would be required to
buy. You also requested that we inform you as to what "terms" we
would require for indemnification.
I would first suggest that this matter hoe now become more
adversarial and I would ask that anything you have to Gay to this
office be put in writing. The "terms" for your continued use of
the airport tie -down area are as followas
1. Sign the enclosed lease and complwith its terms.
2. Obtain tie -down insurance with a 1500,000 limit for
comprehensive liability.
The lease needs to be signed and insurance satisfactory to us
needs to be purchased on or before November 15, 1985. Failure to
comply with these terms will result in removal of the aircraft
through court action.
Sincerely,
CI 7t�
6NA.
1im Rogers
Attorney
TR/clf
Enclosure
)•
I '
i
I
i
\,
October 11, 1965
MEMORANDUM
64 •a
CITY OF KENAI
"Od i9ais al 4 4"„
210 PIDAL40 KENAI, ALASKA 00011
TELEPHONE 283.7638
TOs nai City Council
FROM1 !m Rogers, City Attorney
RE1 Phil Stiffler - C-97 Bomber/Tie-Down Insurance
Currently perked at the Kenai Airport is Mr. Stiffler's C-97
strato-fortress WWII bomber. While according to Mr. Stiffler, he
has insurance for take off and lending purposes, he does not have
tie -down insurance for when the plane is sitting at the airport.
My understanding from conversations with the City Legal Assistant
Is that Mr. Stiffler intends to leave the plane in place for some
timo, but refuses to insure the plane while it io on the ground.
The ground rent for this aircraft is only $100.00 a month.
This is a large plena. The Council members may have aeon this
large silver WWII bomber near the end of the runway where it has
been perked for some time. In my opinion, this aircraft while
being stored at the airport, represents a serious liability
problem (absent tie down insurance) which liability is grossly
disproportionate to the ground rent. As the Council is aware, we
are already facing increases in airport liability insurance.
Allowing this particularly large plane to remain in a tie -down
status without some sort of indemnification protection for the
City, presents a potentially large problem.
The worst case scenario I can imagine could occur if a smell
plane landed and ran into Mr. Stiffler's aircraft. A resultant
explosion and damages would end up with the City defending a low
suit from the smell aircraft owner based on perhaps negligently
positioning Mr. Stiffler's aircraft. Unlikely as this may seem,
if any lawsuit is filed, spurious or not, the City's insurance
company is going to have to pick up the tab for defending the
suit. The result is that our insurance rates skyrocket.
My conclusion is that the City needs to be indemnified. Because
Mr. Stiffler has resisted thie, I am presenting the issue to the
Council in order to give Mr. Stiffler an opportunity to be heard
and to allow the Council to make an informed decision.
TR/dg
M
'
a .
----.,.�_:.. t•'•"- ��.__r,..� - --'racrii�gi-icrl�ii�y.�a=..cur.::-_-_ -
' w
Q6 c
CITY OF KENAI
"Od G?apdoc d 4 4"„
210 PIOAL00 KENAI, ALAEKA M11
TELEPHONE 9t13. 7536
} MEMORANDUM
FROM:IFIlle
m Rogers, Attorney
;y of Kenai
T0:
DATE: October 22, 1985
RE: Airport Liability and Indemnification
As a result of conversations with Kurt Olson of Walters A Olson
Insurance, the City may be advised to adopt a fell -back position
on the indemnification by air traffic operators that would have
the City assume promisee liability for operations of terminal
space consessioneires but have the operators maintain
Indemnification in their insurance of the City for all aircraft
operations, including loading and unloading. This would take
care of some of the situations pointed out by ERA which they feel
could burden them with so-called unjustified liability and yet
protect the City from their actual flight operations.
Kurt Olson hoe indicated that he will be sending me a memorandum
outlining the suggestions that should be incorporated in any
agreement that we reach with these airlines relevant to this type
of modified coverage.
TR/clf
k
t
f
I "
ti
<•
;
r
I
•, •.
1 •�
I
Y
,
e0l"
Suggested by: Administration
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 85-*
A RESOLUTION OF - THE COUNCIL 0•F THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION,
MAINTFNANrF ANn nPERATIOM OF THE.KENAI MUMICIPAL CEMETERY.
WHEREAS, there is no ol'eer and distinguishable set of guidelines
applicable for the purpose of interment in the Kenai Municipal
Cemetery, and
WHEREAS, it is highly desirable that a set of rules be
established for a planned and orderly operation of sold facility
q►„oM7
from the standpoint of communications bet*een—bereaved families,
funeral directors and the municipality, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has a major responsibility in this
area, including but not limited to, the aesthetics of the
cemetery, maintenance and operation, accounting and
accountability and responsibility for providing access to the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the following rules and regulations will
become effective upon the adoption of this resolutions
r.
I� -i' --,..-;lam.-.: :: �• .. � yi.c.i.. __ _ ..: fir. -.:else:. 1 - - _ _
ARTICLE It Administration
Section I The City of Kenai shall cause to be platted in
5' x 100 plate in those areas of the cemetery where interments
have not as yet taken place.
Sect -ion 21 The City Clerk shall be in charge and have
access to said plate for the purpose of assigning plots upon
requests, and have charge of burial records, files and maps
which shall be stored by the City of Kenai. The City Clerk shall
charge a fee of $150.00 per plot.
Section 3t The Perks and Recreation Director and hie or her
designated representative shall enforce all cemetery regulations
and shall exclude from the cemetery any person violating them.
Section 41 The Clerk of the City of Kenai shell maintain
necessary records, files and maps as required by the State to
protect the health and welfare of the community and to ensure
continuity in operation.
Sec_tion_5t The City of Kenai shell not be liable for any
order received verbally or for any mistake occurrinq from the
went of precise and proper instructions so to the particular
space, size or location in a tract where interment is desired.
M
Y
Section 6s The City of Kenai shall take reasonable
precaution to protect all grove markers within the Kenai
Municipal Cemetery from loss or damage but expressly disclaims
any responsibility for loss or damage from causes beyond such
reasonable precautions. Damages incurred directly or
collaterally and caused by or resulting from thieves, vandals,
malicious mischief, unavoidable accidents shall be excluded from
tho City of Kenai's responsibilities.
Section 7: The City of Kenai reserves the right at any
time to enlarge, reduce, replat or change the boundaries or
grading of the City tracts in the Kenai Municipal Cemetery or any
pert thereof; to modify or change location of or move or regrade
roade, drives or walks, or any part thereof; to ley, maintain end
operate or alter or change pipelines or gutters or sprinkling
systems, drainage or otherwise.
Section St The City of Kenai reserves for itself the
perpetual right to ingress and egress over all plots for the
' purpose of maintenance, operations or any emergency work
necessary to the operation of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery.
t.
E
r
i�
.
r
a
•
a
w'.
N �
I
• �
i
ARTICLE Its Maintenance of Cemetery.
Section It The City of Kenai is responsible for the
i
appearance of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery. The maintenance of
the cemetery shall be accomplished through a program administered
I
by the Parke and Recreation Department.
I
Section 2s The City of Kenai shall maintain the driveways,
I
gates and fencing of the Kenai Municipal Cemetery and may close
such access facilities in periods of adverse conditions.
Section 3s No trees, shrubbery, plants or turf shall be
planted, transplanted, plucked, picked or pruned within the Kenai
Municipal Cemetery without -the written consent of the Parks and
Recreation Director or his authorized representative. The City
` of Kenai shall provide grass cutting at reasonable intervals,
raking, cleaning, grading and landscaping.
i
r,
Section 4s No enclosure of any kind, such as a fence,
- copin77or ditch shall be permitted around or about any
grave or burial lot and no burial lot shall be raised above the
'.. established grave. Wooden benches, boxes, shelves, toys and
other articles upon a grove or burial lot shall not be permitted.
Temporary decorations are permitted during religious, national
and state holidays.
r
v
'u
F
Section 5: No material shall be allowed to remain in the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery longer than is reasonably necessary for
any construction work. During periods of break-up, no heavy
hauling will be permitted.
ARTICLE III: Use of Graves.
Section 1: Grave preparation: All openings, closing, plot
preparation, interments, disinterments and removals shall be
done by and at the expense of the funeral home conducting the
services and under the supervision of the Parke and Recreation
Director or his designee.
Section Z: Individual grave markers. Type: Only ground
level markers set in a concrete base shall be used in the Kenai
Municipal Cemetery from the date of the adoption of these rules.
Section 3: Installation of grave markers: All foundations
for grave markers shall be installed at the head of the grave by
and at the expense of the subject party. No more then one grave
marker per lot shall be allowed.
ARTICLE IV: Interment or Disinterment.
Section 1: The City Clerk shall assign a plot number to a
specific plot in advance of the preparation of a grave whenever
an interment or disinterment is to be made.
it
Y
q
I
Section 2: The City Clerk shall be provided with the
appropriate State burial and transit permits before interment
will be permitted. The burial lots can be used for no other
purpose then interment.
Section 3: Interment or disinterment shall be made in
compliance with all State and City health and sanitation lays.
ARTICLE Vs Reservation permits and mortuary responsibilities.
Section 1s A reservation of burial space in the
Kenai Municipal Cemetery can be acquired by applying to the City
Clerk and being assigned a platted plot or plots after having
paid the appropriate fee. A4 joup Q' 6B'&'4j
Section 2s A mortuary conducting a funeral service may
provide, place and remove greene, decorations or seating used for
a burial and must provide neceasery lowering devices.
Section3s No person shall enter the Kenai Municipal
Cemetery except through the established access routea. The
cemetery will be open daily from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. during
the months of May through October. During the months of November
through April, the park will be open for burials only.
11.
•
a
a
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this *w day of
1985.
Tom Wagoner, Mayor
ATTESTS
i Janet Whelan, City—Cl—ark
i
j
US.Oeponment Alaskan Region
of ftnVartakon
Moral Aviation
Adminlstrotion
N, Clrl Thift
c�, CII1' Q1+OCifAl , ti'
July 25 r 1985
701 C Street, Box 14
Anchorage, Alaska
99513
Mr. William Brighton
City Manager
City of Kenai
Kenair Alaska
Dear Mr. Brighton:
We really appreciated the opportunity to meet with Jeff
Labhan and Charlie Brown on July 19, 1985r concerning the
recent Office of inspector General's (OIG) report. From
the lands point of view, we were very satisfied with the
City of Kenai's recordkeeping. All the questions raised by
their report were answered.
During this meetingr a discussion was held about the
negotiated sales procedure that is presently used. As in
the past, Howard Smith of my office has suggeted the land
sales be done by bid sale rather than negotiated. Howeverr
it is recognized that past airport lessee's should have
some rights to buy the property they had previously held by
lease. Apparently, there have been certain parties lease
airport property and then in a short time ask for a negoti-
ated sale of the same property. We request immediate action
be taken to prevent this circumvention of the bid sale
procedures. Two suggested methods are noted below:
✓ I. Establish a minimum lease term of 5 years prior to
allowing for a requested sale.
V 2. Establish a dater i.e.r August it 1985r wherein no
future disposals will be allowed without going to bid
sale except those who have a legal lease dated prior to
August it 1985.
r.
I
Z
These are only suggestions and recommend upon review that
the City of Kenai develop an approved change to your
disposal procedures. We would appreciate a response by
August 16 , 1965, as to what action the City intends to
take. If further discussion is needed, please feel free to
call.
Sincerely,
�aul. Larson, Manager
Safety and Standards Branch
Airports Division
4
W
�
M
J
`
V - tR I
,Devehiffimmom-
Suggested by: Landscaping Review Hoard
CITY OF KENAI
ORDINANCE N0. ;-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE C11Y OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE
KENAI ZONING CODE SECTION 14.25.010 PERTAINING TO THE LANDSCAPING
REGULATIONS.
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai recently established the Landscaping
Regulations, and
WHEREAS, the Landscaping Review Board has had an opportunity to work with
the Regulations, and
WHEREAS, the Board has found some sections needing more definitive
regulation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
as follows$
Section 1s KMC 14.25.010 is hereby amended as foilowe$
14,25.010 intents It is the intent of this section to provide for
landeopaing en or the retention of natural vegetation in conjunction
with commercial and industrial development within the City of Kenai.
14,25.020 Application
This section shall apply to all commercial and industrl�,,
development within the City of Kenai. "Commercial ovelopment" shall
be defined as any improvements requiring a building permit for [NEW]
construction located on properties within the Central Commercial (CC)
[AND] General Commercial (CG), Heavy Industrial (IN) and Light
Industrial (10 zoning districts.
14.25.030 Landscaping Plan - Submittal Reguirementas
1
r
Q
I
' I
2
These are only suggestions and recommend upon review that
the City of Kenai develop an approved change to your
disposal procedures. We would appreciate a response by
` August 16, 1985, as to what action the City intends to
f take. If further discussion is needed, please feel free to
j call.
Sincerely,
RiPTPV
aul A. Larson Manager
Safety and Standards Branch
Airports Division
y
a ,
,
I
i
r
F '
i
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this • day of •, 1905,
TOP OE, MAYOR
ATTESTr
1�Janet a en, C y C er
First Reading# +►, 1985
SecorW Readings +►, 1965
Effective Deter 1965
'•
u