Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-03-04 Council PacketCOUNCIL PACKETS 1985 Kenai City Council Meeting Packet April 3, 1985 J• r I!� h � .i Jl.�rt , __ /� �Qi•: r q}^-,rye AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING APRIL 3, 1985, 7100 PH WORK SESSION, 600 PH - Dick Horgan - Golf Course Proposal PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval C onaent Agenda +Aii !tame listed with an eeteeLek (•) are considered to be routine and non-controveraial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council \A-0V member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its �rO r Q normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. y o- 8. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit - 10 minutes per person) C. PUBLIC HEARINGS ✓ 1. Ordinance 1022-85 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Purchase City Atlas - $5,000 ,flu 2. Ordinance 1023-85 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Water & •!�` Sewer - S. Highland, Bumblebee, E. Alisk, Swiree, Highbuah Rd. - $232,000 3. Ordinance 1024-95 - Finding City -Owned Lands Required for Public Purpose - F80 S/D a. Substitute Ord. 1024-85 4. Ordinance 1025-65 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Museum Donations - $1,294 5. Ordinance 1026-85 - Amending Zoning Hap - Sprucewood Glen S/D 6. Ordinance 1027-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Lease of Airport & Airport Lands le- 7. Resolution 05-33 - Setting Percentage of Coats of Streets, Sewers, Water & Other Improvements - Assessments 8. Report to Council - Alisk/McCollum Assessment District a. Preliminary Assessment Roll - Aliak/McCollum Assessment District 9. Resolution 05-30 - Setting Date of Public Hearing - S Aliak/McCollum Assessment District 10. Resolution 85-31 - Transfer of Funds - Communications .' Department Overtime - $10,000 11. Resolution 85-32 - Transfer of Funds - Library, Public Works Telephone Expenses - $4,500 �►� 12. Resolution 85-34 - Transfer of Funds - Airport Snow $14,000 o p) N 13. Application for New Liquor License - Beachcomber Steakhouse 14. Renewal of Liquor License - Little Ski No 0. MINUTES L",�+ 1. Regular Meeting, March 20, 1995 «- .-. - " " WOO---. E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. *Source Unk. - Pacific Telecommunications Purchase of Centel 2. *Sen. DeVrloo - title 29 Revision 3. *DNR Comm. Munnicke - Cook Inlet Sao 6 Oil 4. *DOT - Sterling Highway Upgrade 5- *1m. Nelson 6 Assoc. - Harbor/Dock Facility - Kenai R. 6. *DOT Comm. Knapp - Spur Highway Maintenance and 4-Lone 7. *C&RA - Annexation Petition 1 F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Street Light Conte 2. Lease Application - E. Petty - CIIAP S. NEW BUSINESS (j 1. Bills to be Peid, Billo to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 ~ — 3. *Ordinance 1029-85 - Increasing Rev/Appno - Equipment to Plant 6 Remove Trees - $1,330 4. ""/Ordinance 1030-85 - Disposition of Tracts A,B,C - r" Dens'ine Pt. 5. *Ordinance 1031-85 - Increasing Rev/Appno - Library Donations - $3,000 6. *Ordinance 1032-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Appointment Dates - Harbor Comm., Library Comm. Qinv�� 7. *Ordinance 1033-85 - Amending Zoning Code - Variance Permit S. *Ordinance 1034-85 - Amending Zoning Code - Development Requirements - IL, IH Zoning Districts 9. Lease Amendment - Doyle - Gusty S/D �.10. Discussion - Fine Arts Center By -Lowe 11. Discussion - EPA Grants - Major Sewer Interceptors 12. Discussion - Landscape Hooter Plan ----13. Olecuseion - Fire Control Agreement with State 14. *Cameo of Chance 6 Skill - Peninsula Board of Realtors 15. *Cameo of Chance 6 Skill - `. Peninsula Home Builders Ason. 16. Discussion - Project Statue - E. Aliok, Highbueh, Bumblebee, Suites Road Improvements M. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney Neyoe 4. City Clerk i S. Finance Director 6. Planning 6 Zoning 7. Harbor Commission S. Recreation Commission i { 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit - 5 minutes per person) ADJOURNMENT -" f l i i i r. ff a -------�- -3 El a l' tv COUNCIL ME.11T I NG ikil I �4/y � u cop y �l�➢�D�i�71�7E��i'��1�79II�1�➢�� ����I�J017���IG�117171'117�IPi�I■ l7�J6if7►70�i/7��'J�JrilE117� ri�I��Il7�iP1��G➢�II7��IL170■� 17VI17�I■� COUNCIL MEETING OF - April 3, 1985 INFORMATION ITEMS 1 - KPB Minutes, Feb. 129 1985 2 - Municipal League Bulletin - March 15, 1985 3 - Billing - Southcentral Communications - Electronic Monitoring Project - $89324.25 4 - Library & Information Resources, Northwest - Review 5 - Billing - Doyle Construction - Baron Pk Water & Sewer - $13,839.15 6 - KPB Minutes, Feb. 199 1965 7 - KPB Minutes, March 5, 1985 8 - Status Report, McLane & Assoc. - Sprucewood Glen S/D LID 9 - Status Report, McLane do Assoc. - Inlet Woods LID 10 - Transfers Under $1,000 11 - KPB Agende, April 29 1985 12 - Municipal League Newsletter - March 22, 1985 13 - Letter to Architect Gintoli Regarding Proposed Community Center 14 - KPB Resolution - Protesting Liquor Licenses for Violators of Sales Tax & Personal Property Tax Regs• 15 - Billing - Triad Electric - Library Addition - $950.00 16 - Agreement - KUSCO, Enstar, City of Kenai 17 - Memo, Land Manager Labahn - Comprehensive Plan jw Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1022-65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1984-1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $5,000.00 TO PURCHASE COPIES OF A KENAI CITY ATLAS. WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain copies of a Kenai City atlas that detaile.exLeting streets and subdivisions in a consolidated format, and WHEREAS, the City has considered two options of obtaining the atlas$ (1) purchase the rights to copy the atlas, and (2) direct purchase of individual copies, and WHEREAS, the City Administration believes that it is most advantageous to directly purchase individual copies on an so -needed beefs, and WHEREAS, an appropriation of $59000 will allow for a maximum purchase of 200 copies at $25.00 each. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenue and appropriations be mades General Fund nereeee Estimated Revenues Appropriations of Fund Balance $5,000.00 Increase Appropriations Planning & Zoning - Miscellaneous $50000.00 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Readings March 20, 1985 Second Readings April 3, 1985 Effective Dates April 3, 1985 Approved by Finances 'G/ _ 7" 1� CLASKA c MA. MING SYSTEMS 36915 Chlnulna Drive, Kenai S.R.2 Box 783 Soldotne, Alaska 99669 907 283.3169 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LICENI�SING AGREEMENT VS DIRECT PURCHASE BY THE CITY OF KENAI FOR THE 1985 KENAI CITY ATLAS, THIS PUBLICATION ENTIRELY PRODUC D BY ALASKA MAPPING SYSTEMS AND SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE MARCH 20, 985, OPTION 1 - LICENSE PURCHASE ADVANTAGES . PROVIDES THE LOWEST PRINTING COST PER COPY, GIVES THE CITY THE OPTION TO MAKE ISOLATED COPIES WrTHOUT COPY- RIGHT VIOLATIONS, 3. PROVIDES THE CITY ACCESS TO THE PRINTERS PLATES SO THAT ADDI- TIONAL COPIES MAY BE MADE AS REQUIRED, 4. IT ESTABLISHES A PRECEDENCE FOR THE PURCHASE OF FUTURE UPDATED PUBLICATIONS AND ALLOWS THE OPTION TO PRE -NEGOTIATE SOME FUTURE COSTS, QI SADVANTAGES HIGHEST INITIAL COST, . THE RISK OF OVER SPENDING. . THE LIABILITY OF PRINTING COSTS, OPTION 2 - DIRECT PURCHASE ADVANTAGES 1. LOWEST INITIAL COST, 02-5rt—c-+ TO QISADVANTAGES ],. THE POSSIBILITY OF UNDERESTIMATING ACTUAL NEED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD. . THE INFLESIBILITY OF THE COVER PRICE FOR FUTURE PURCHASES. . THE POTENTIAL OF COPY -RIGHT VIOLATIONS. . THE FACT THAT A LICENSING OFFER WILL NOT BE MADE IN THE FUTURE IF THIS OPTION IS CHOSEN. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THOMAS D. bU?NY,IRINCIPAL MARCH 6, 187 N Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1023-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE S. HIGHBUSH, BUMBLEBEE, EAST ALIAK, SWIRES AND HIGHBUSH ROAD CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. WHEREAS, the City is in the process of soliciting bids for construction of the above water, sewer, and streets capital improvement, and WHEREAS, the City desires to award a bid for all of the work, including additive alternates, which is estimated to coot $2329000 more than is currently provided in the budget, and WHEREAS, the City has sufficient State grant monies set aside as a result of projects that have been completed for less than their appropriations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF •J KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increase in estimated revenue and appropriations be made in the S. Highbush, Bumblebee, East Alisk, Swires, and Highbush Road Capital Projects Increase Estimated Revenue: 1981 Municipal Road Grant $ 66,276 1982 Municipal Road Grant 165,724 Increase Appropriations: 0 0 Construction $1629000 Contingency 70,000 ra 2 000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. Q ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: TOM WAGONER, MAYOR First Reading: March 20, 1985 Second Readings April 3, 1985 Effective Date: April 3, 1985 iJ V w CITY OF KENAI i0dal 4 4" 210 FIDALOO KWAI, ALAeW OM11 TMMKONEM-7036 MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director Pa Q DATE: March 29, 1985 SUBJECT: Ordinance 9 1023-85 Please table this ordinance until April 17, 1965, The bid opening has been postponed until April 16, 1985. it is unnecessary to appropriate the money at this time. We will have more accurate figures at the April 17th Council Meeting. !` --r NO — - - -- if s i 3uryrye0 od by s P t ann).nq A ZonI nsl CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO, 1024-O5 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL (IF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALA9KA, FINDIN(l THAT CERTAIN CITY -OWNED AIRPORT LANDS ARE REQUIRED FOR PORLiC USE. l: WHEREAS, the Kenn) Municipal Code 22-05.050 pruvidon for the li dedication of londa for u public purpoue if no determined by Council, and C I WHEREAS, there io a projoctod nood for additional vehicle porkinq In the vicinity of the Kenai Municipal Airport within the next five yeoro, and WHEREAS, the City of Konoi owno contain airport londo near the terminal building which would be ouitoblo for parking facilitioo, and WHEREAS, Tract B, Lot 1 and the adjacont right-of-way located within Block 2 of FOO Subdivinion are unlonood lando which are appropriate for thin purpooe, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advioory Planninq and Zoninq Commioo).on recommended the dedication of th000 proportion for future airport parking at their meeting on March 13, 1905, NOW, THEREFOREt BE 1T ORDAINED UY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF f KENAI, ALASKA, no fotlowos Section 1s The deacribod City -owned Tondo are hereby reaorv�e 'f orFubllc one for the purp©oo of airport vohiclo :j porkings Tract B, R/W and Lot 11 Block 2, FBO Subdiviofon. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA# thin 3rd day of April, 1999, ,.WAT no MAYOR ATTESTs E ane a an, cify Clerk Firot Readings March 20. 1909 Second Readinsls April 3, 19O9 Effoctive Dotes May 3. 19R3 gv/ / 1 9�/1+ I • Y SUB!1T 1 TUTE Suggontod bys Planning h /onlnq CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1024-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KF,NAI, ALASKA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN CITY -OWNED AIRPORT LANDS ARE REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE. WHEREAS, the Kenai Municipal Coda 22.05.050 provides for the dedication of lands for a public purpose if no determined by Council, and WHEREAS, there is a projected hood for oddttlonal vehicle perking in the vicinity of the Kenai Municipal Airport within the next five yooro, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai owns certain airport Lando near the terminal building which would be sultable for parking facilities, and WHEREAS, Tract B. Lot 1 and the adjacent right-of-way located within Block 2 of FRO Subdivioion are unlenaed lands which are appropriate for this purpose, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planninq and 2oninq Commionion recommended the dedication of there proportion for future airport parking at their meeting on March 13, 1985, and LREAS, it to aloo desirable to reserve Lot 2, Block 2, FBO division for acceaa purpooeo to the City Animal Shelter and ntenance Shop. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA# as followas Section 1s The deocribod City -owned lands are hereby reaervublic use for the purpose of airport vehicle parkings Tract B, R/W and Lot 1t Block 2, FOO Subdivision. Section 2s The deocribod City -owned land io hereby resorvublie use for the purpose of vehicular access to the City Animal Shelter and Maintenance Shop. \1) Ar V.7 1'\V, -;) ) �'0U - __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _T PASSEL) 8Y THE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, RWYOR ATTEST: anec wneian, ciry Lier First Reading: March 20, 1985 Second Reading: April 31 1985 Effective Date: May 3, 1985 r.. I UNDE 0 •IW INK Ab 0 Of 4g /a 0 r -4r % 4t At 41 AAA. A 'niet - CITY OF KENAI 210FIVAL00 KENAI,ALA9KA 99611 TOW14ONE 283.7536 March 15, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Waqoner 6 Kenai. City Council FROM: Randy Ernst, Airport Manager at REs Future Automobile Parking Requirements I have recommended to the Planninq and Zoninq Commission that Tract B, right-of-way and Lot 1, Block 2, FBO Subdivision be set aside for future automobile parking. The long term parking lot stays full most of the time. Therefore, it has become necessary to designate the north and south rows of the short term parkinq lot and the south row of the car rental lot (total of 66 spaces) as additional long term parking. This seems to have alleviated long term parking overflow across Willow Street on Tract B. The short term parking appears to be adequate at present, even with the 42 spaces redesignated as long term parking. This lot stays one-third to one-half full most all days. I project continued pressure on long term parking availability and subsequent short term parking shortages within the next two to five years. The setting aside of these parcels now will be essential for future parkinq demands. Approximately 150 additional spaces can be constructed from these parcels and that will allow enough long term parking so that all spaces in the short term parking lot can again be used for short term parking (42 spaces). This will solve two parking needs with only one newly developed parking lot. RE/dq r-- J lop— AIWORT (PARI'l t' I G) We .20 0 EIAPLOYEES 4. 1' r/I R 16 t Col I— I F-L.rd.-ET & RE1174—L C, 124 a :34: 34 3 42 2 42 z4 21' 21 23 CL tt-� SHORT TERIM-" LONG TES -*':"—"WILLOW STREET T ADD."-'"IOI-'V'A L 1 TER14 PARKRIG w S N E G Suggested bys Administration rr CITY OF KENAI i ORDINANCE NO. 1025-85 t AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, 1 INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1984-1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $1,294 AS A RESULT OF DONATIONS TO THE KENAI MUSEUM. WHEREAS, the City has received $1,294 in donations for the Kenai Museum, and WHEREAS, the City Administration desires to have the money appropriated for construction of display cases for the Museum. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increase in estimated revenue and appropriations be mades General Fund ncresse Estimated Revenues Miscellaneous Donations $1,294 Increase Appropristionss Museum - Repair and Maintenance $1,294 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. O14 WAGONER, MAYOR PE ATTESTs Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Readings March 20, 1985 Second Readinqs April 3. 1985 Effective Dates April 3, 1985 Approved by Finances 04;j 4 :w r) V , Suggested bys Planning A Zoninq Commission CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1026-65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING A PORTION OF TRACT D, SPRUCEWOOD GLEN SUBDIVISION TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.270 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, the rezoning petition has been received from Louis Schilling to rezone the southerly portion of Tract D, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision from Suburban Residential (RS) District to General Commercial (CG) District, and WHEREAS, Tract D, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision is currently separated into two zoning districts as a result of previous replatting and subsequent road construction, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on March 13, 1905, and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the'rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution No. PZ85-12, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai shall be amended as followss Section It Subject property consisting of the southerly portionf Tract D, Sprucewood Glen Subdivision is hereby rezoned from Suburban Residential (RS) to General Commercial (CG) District. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. ATTESTS 3anet Whelan, City Clerk II�IL■"I_iK�],�h4iMuL�'L�1,� First Readings March 20, 1985 Second Readings April 3, 1985 Effective Dates May 3, 1985 l_ ___ ._-- - . - __.. __.. _.. _. _... _._� /T F' ln•F.rM.wrn.n•i - �sJ+.�.i�'j�:� _..��Y�-°' o"�Sir`�'•."'•. Y". 1 0 to �• C'� �r R.. '`> CAW• ,u4 �!f\,/// \''♦ 4 r r �•� \ p��,J. O \ ♦goo O Cn! ���\ to .B \\�°• f! , i\ 100, si .� ° Z C hvlvrte &AL1_ .0e 1l A � 7 li.K+wat� - - O1• '� AO r' S�avcrwt�oA ; � v � j Cey •,♦ ,Sp C!yb tr 6Jt•�y� iy� %��y ♦y O f O •. 'i m ( \ 2i _n -!�Q f9�y Rd• v Hr I - � � r , •,• f• ��1 ,r J }; - 7.1 C -.15� CITY OF KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ A RESOLUTION OF THE AD ORY PLANNING 6 ZONING COMMISSION OF TH CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING APPROV (DENIAL) OF THE REQUESTED EZONING (LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT) SUBMITTED BY L_ocu.5 Applicant) FOR —.i ri_ _ .r/., WHEREAS, the Commission finds the followings 1. The subject property is currently zoned&L6ZAA Z;e/' 2. The present land useplan designption of the subject property is t-,L. i 3. The proposed �QISTR�T�(LAXDUSE PLAN DESIGNATION) Por the affected property i.,�op, /i 4. An appropriate puglic hearing as required has been conducted by the Commission on .f/ice&C i. That the following additional facts have been found to exists NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advis�or Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai tha etitioned:MCZ (LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT) is hereby ECOMNENDE (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai City Council. PASSED by the Advisory Planning A Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai. Alaska, this A.-J f day of C airman ATTESTS Manning Secret;&K- 8/84 R: KENAI SF 0 y I r RS C / ©� � 4 1 ! ass 9� dv --y Suggested by% Administration i CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1027-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REPEALING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 21 OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE REFERRING TO THE LEASE OF CITY AIRPORT AND AIRPORT LANDS. WHEREAS, Title 21 of the Kenai Municipal Code contains various sections pertaininq to the lease of City Airport Lands that are redundant, or that state principles of law that are of general application, or are such that mandatory inclusion is not in the best interests of the City; and WHEREAS, the elimination of such provisions from the Code would not reduce the ability of the City to require and enforce the requirements and restrictions contained in the various sections through the lease instrument itselfs and WHEREAS, the repeal of such provisions would aid the lease procedure and increase consistence by eliminating redundant and unnecessary provisions for the protection of the City's interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THATs Section 1s Sections No. 21.15.010, 21.15.090, 21.15.220, 21.15.230, 21.20.010(b), 21.20.090, 21.20.220, 21.20.230, 21.20.280, 21.20.300, 21.20.310. 21.20.320, 21.20.330, 21.20.340, 21.20.350 OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE BE AND HEREBY ARE REPEALED. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 3rd day of April, 1985. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk TOM WAGONER, MAYOR First Reading: March 20, 1995 Second Readings April 3, 1985 Effective Date: April 3. 1985 -Q ----- --- . a i 21.15.010•-21.15.020 E' Sectionss 21.15.010 : € 21.15.020 21.15.030 21.15.040 21.15.050 21.15.060 21.15.070 21.15.080 21.15.090 21.15.100 21.15.110 21.15.120 21.15.130 21.15.140 21.15.150 21.15.160 21.15.170 + t% 21.15.180 21.15.190 21.15.200 21.15.210 21.15.220 21.15.230 21.15.240 i' Chapter 21.15 PROVISIONS REOUIREO Proper location. Lease utilization. Payment of rent. Adjustment of rental. Subleasing. Assignments. Modification. Cancellation -forfeiture. notice or demand. Financing -Rights of mortgagee or lienholder. Entry and re-entry. Forfeiture of rental. Written waiver. Easements grants reserved. Lease subordinate to financing requirements. Surrender on termination. Sanitation. Building and zoning codes. Fire protection. Inspection. Personal use of materials. Restrictions and reservations. Waste and injury to land. Warranty. eo 21.15.010 Prover Locations It shall be the respon- sibility of the essee to prcperly locate himself and his improvements on the leased land. It shall be unlawful to encroach on other lands of the City, or on lands owned or leased by another, and violation shall constitute default in the lease and unless corrected in a reasonable time after written notice shall be sufficient grounds for cancellation ----- of the lease of the option of the City. (Ords 258, 400, 531) 21.15.020 Lease Utilization: Leased lands shall be utilized for purposes within the scope of the application, n the terms of the lease and in conformity with the ordinances } of the City and Borough, and in substantial conformity with the comprehensive plan. Utilization or development for other than the allowed uses shall constitute a violation of the lease and subject the lease to cancellation at any time. i 21-8 (City of Kenai Supp. #29 - 7/20/84) 21.15.090-21.15.100 21.15.090 Notice or Demand: Any notice or demand which under the terms of a lease or under any statute must be given or made by the parties thereto, shall be in writing and be given or made by registered or certified mail, ad- dressed to the other party at the address of record. How- ever, either party may designate in writing such new or other address to which such notice or demand shall there- after be so given, made, or mailed. A notice given here- under shall be deemed delivered when deposited in a U.S. general or branch post office, enclosed in a registered or certifiedenvelope, addressed as hereinabove provided. (Orris e t fi d mail 21.15.100 Financiaa-Rights of Mortgagee or Lienholder: (a) For the purpose of interim or permanent financing or refinancing from time to time of the improvements to be placed upon the leased premises, and for no other purpose, a lessee, after giving written notice thereof to the City, may encumber by mortgage, deed of trust, assignment or other appropriate instrument, the lessee's interest in the leased premises and in and to the lease, provided such encumbrance pertains only to such leasehold interest and does not pertain to or create any interest in the City's title to the leased premises. If such mortgage, deed of trust, or assignment shall be held by a bank or other established lending or financial institution (which terms shall include an established insurance company and qualified pension or profit sharing trust) and such institution shall acquire the lessee's interest in such lease as a result of a sale under said encumbrance pursuant to a foreclosure or other remedy of the secured party, or through any transfer in lieu of foreclosure, or through settlement of or arising out of any pending or contemplated foreclosure action, such lending institution shall have the privilege of transferring its interest in such lease to a nominee or a wholly -owned subsidiary cor- poration with the prior consent of the City, provided, however, such transferee shall assume all of the covenants and conditions required to be performed by the lessee, whereupon such lending institution, or the nominee or wholly -owned subsidiary corporation to which it may have transferred such lease, or any other lending institution which may at any time acquire such lease, shall be relieved of any further liability under such lease from and after such transfer. W A leasehold mortgagee, beneficiary of a deed of trust, or security assignee, shall have and be subrogated to an- and sly rights of the lessee with respect to the curing of any default hereunder by lessee. (c) rf the holder of an;: such mortgage, or the bene- ficiary of ant such deed of trust, or the security assignee shall give the City before any default shall have occurred in the Luse, a written notica containing the name and post o�°_ce addr,±ss of such holder, the City shall thereafter ^i:•e to auci: holder a copy of each notice of default by the lessee at "-- same tie as any noti=e of default shall be ` c: c.n by the Cam.., ..., .,. a l•assee, a..:. the C_ wz1l rat rhereaftar acce:" zr_ surrendar or enter into an;. nod-4- (City of Kenai 21-10 Su p. 0 - 6/201M i 21. 15.220-21. 15. 240 21.15.220 Restrictions and Reservations: The lease shall contain such restrictions and reservations as are necessary to protect the public interest. (Ords 258, 400, 531) 21.15.230 Waste and Iniury to Land: If any person shall commit waste, trespass, or other njury upon City ti land, the person so offending, in addition to being civilly liable for any damages caused, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. (Ords 258, 400, 531) G ` 21.15.240 Warrant•• The City does not warrant by its Is classification or leas nq of land that the land is ideally suited for the use authorized under said classification or lease, and no guaranty is given or implied that it shall be profitable to employ the land to said use. (Ords 258, 400, 531) y _ , (CitZ of Kenai Supp. 43 - 6/20/80) 21-1y 21.20.010-21.20.030 (a) City reserves the right to adopt, amend, and enforce reasonable rules and regulations governing the demised premises and the public areas and facilities used in connection therewith. Except in cases of emergency, no rule or regulation hereafter adopted or amended by the City shall become applicable unless it has been given 30 days notice of adoption or amendment thereof. (b) Lessee, in the conduct of its operations on the demised premises, shall observe, obey, and comply with any and all applicable rules, regulations, laws, ordinances, or orders of any governmental authority, federal or state, lawfully exercising authority over lessee or lessee's conduct of its business. (c) City shall not be liable to lessee for any diminution or deprivation of possession, or of its rights hereunder, on account of the exercise of any such right or authority as in this section provided, nor shall lessee be entitled to terminate the whole or any portion of the leasehold estate herein created, by reason of the exercise of such rights or authority, unless the exercise thereof shall so interfere with lessee's use and occupancy of the leasehold estate as to constitute a termination in whole or in part of this lease by operation of law in accordance with the laws of the State of Alaska and of the United States made applicable to the states. (Ord 531) 21.20.020 Aircraft Operations Protected: (a) The City shall reserve to itself, its successors, and assigns, for the use and benefit of the public, a right of flight for the passage of aircraft in the airspace above the surface and all improvements approved by the City of the premises conveyed, together with the right to cause in said airspace such noise as may be inherent in the operation of aircraft, now or hereafter used for navigation of or flight in the air, using said airspace for landing at, taking off from, or l operating on the Kenai Airport. When plans for improvements {: pursuant to the terms of the lease are approved by the City, the City to the extent of those improvements releases the easements here expressed. j (b) The lessee by accepting conveyance expressly agrees for itself, its representatives, successors, and assigns, that it will not erect nor permit the erection of any structure or object, on the land conveyed, which would be an airport obstruction within the standards established !` under the Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, Part 77, as amended. In the event the aforesaid covenant is broached, the City reserves the right to enter on the land co^•reyed hereunder and to remove the offendinq structure or ob;cct, all of hick shall be at the expense of the lessee or its heir:., successors, or assigns. (Ord 531) 1 .. f - I 21.20.330 Ri.-! t to 9n,o ,!nent 7:nd 7:33ccabla POsaession: .h2 Cit,, Shall a rae anu co:'c?n3.^.� t::3t t t e• a ��: ..a..�,.^.T rent and n•�r'.zr:':I.^. j other co a^anL.^., ter'=-, 1....— I 1 ha C e o :::_et. , srd C^A.,^..�. 2 C.^.3 �� : t.^. i c?3;3c' shall C.^. � I • t � ca��i;;.. • hold, use, y...... ts. � t .., :..at, OC � , and •�n �O,l 3 :,al.. .c?aSL'd ;^.:o:'Sl$es, i (Cit1 of Kenai Supp.. f3 - 6/::3/33) I r' 0 21.20.070-21.20.110 (d) In the event facilities arc conutructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this lease, for a purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the lessee shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -assisted Programs of the Department of Trans- portation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. (Ord 531) 21.20.080 Partial Invalidit s If any term, provision, condition or part of the lease is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining terms, provisions, conditions, or parts shall continue in full force and effect as though such declaration was not made. (Ord 531) 21.20.090 Parole Modifications: It shall be mutually understood and agreed between the parties that the agreement, as 'written, shall cover all the agreements and stipulations between the parties; and no representations, oral or written, have been made modifying, adding to, or changing the terms thereof. (Ord 531) 21.20.100 Amendment of Leases Notwithstanding anything J to the contrary, in order to ald the lessee in the financing of the improvements to be situated herein, the City shall agree that in the event the proposed mortgagee, beneficiary, or security assignee under any interim or permanent loan on the security of the leasehold interest of the lessee and the improvements to be situated thereon so rcggires, the City will make a reasonable effort to amend this; lease in order to satisf7 such requirements upon the express condition and understanding, however, that such variance in language will , not materially prejudice the City's rights thereunder nor be such as to alter in any way the rental obligations of the lessee hereunder nor its obligations to comply with all existing laws and regulations of the City relating to the leasing of airport lands, and to all applicable Federal statutes, rules, and regulations, and all covenants and conditions of the deed by 'which the City holds title to the land. (Ord 531) 21.20.110 Conotian_e With Taws;: Les3sea shall co-mol- with all applicably Laws;, ovainancoa, and regulations of + pssiilic authoriti.:s now or hereafter in any -sanncr affecting j tz, leased s%remiucs or the s;Ldcwalra, ,alleys, streets, and eray adjacent tsicrcto or any buildings, structures, fixtures, and i;anrovn_^snnt5 or the uze thereof, whether or not any suc n I laws, ordi-ancc5, and regulations whicw atayl bo hereafter -nact•ad i'::•..•:�� a c..ancb e_ olic;• or. ,..a part of t..,_ •- �c;.ern^Lntzl "s:oc:;• �rac:z:,s t.4a :,are. -eizee agroeo .a %._ .1.I�V Cat_:' . �..^.3nCsail'. :12:'7:�•%83: (City of Xonai21-13 Suaa. s3 - 6/20/31) I . I.. - — - __ - _ 1--.. 21.20.200-21.20.270 P` \�J1 21 .20.200 lnn rec;t,sons The lcsoaov nhrsll alloy nuthrsciaoEf reprooentativon o to City to enter the leaned land for inupoction at any reasonable time. (Ord 531) 21.20.210 Personal flno of Mniorialos All coal, oil, goo, and other minors o and all epooito OF stone or gravel valuablo for extraction or utilization and all matRrialu subject to Title II, Division t, Choptora 49 5, and G of the Aleakn Adminiatcative Code are excepted from the operation of a aurface lonao. specifically, the leeaee of the nurfaco eights ahall not gall or remove for isoa oloowhero any timber, atone, gravel, pent moats, topsoil, or any other material valuable for building or commercial pucpogeo; providod, however, that material required for the development of the loaaohold may be wood if its uoo io firat approved by the City. (Ord 531) 21,20.220 Reatcictiona and Reourvationas Thu Longo ahall contain such routrictiono and reaervotiono as are nec000nry to protect the public interest. (Ord 531) 21,20.230 W ante and Injury to lands If any peroon shall commit weate, tregpgOut Of of er in ury upon City land, the peroon 00 offending, in addition to being civilly liable for any damaeleo eauood, ahall be doomed guilty of a miadomeanor. (Ord 531) 21.20.240 Warrant s The City doea not warrant by its classification or !aiming of land that the land is ideally ousted for the uaa authorized under acid cluoutfieation or Longo# and no guaranty is given or implied that it oholl be profitable to employ land to anid uoo. City boars no reoponotbility for any water erosion of land. (Ord 531) 21.20,250 Ageroval of Other Auth ritions The ioauanee by the City of lonoeo aaeo no re seve the gran ee or l000eg of responsibility of obtaining lieenario or permito no may be - required by duly authorized Borough, state, or federal agenciea. (Orda 259, 4009 531) 21.20,260 Title Rontrictionos All toaueo or anion of - property ahall be ma a ou.Ject to costriotionn and reoervationis in tteq patent, deed, or othrir in3trument under which the City - holdo. (Ordo 259, 400, 531) --- 21.20,270 Inoursince-Hold Narmlns•is (n) Lnooae ahsill Covenant to eaves tfia Lsty harm eons rrom all sect tone, stuit3, ' li:jbi l it ilia, or damngeo reauit tnel from or ,jri:sinry nut of any acts 1 of Cgmmiooinn or omizi:sinn by the 111001ses. hilt aryonta, employees, euutu-reset, invites�sn, or nrisssnei from or uut or the 11srinrsrs'S3 j ncc,trc at sun, or uoe of thrr premises demi:srssf, or priv i laryesss rind to pay .111 4oAI r:esnnWO-to ttrrsrrswith, In thins i 1 rorinect inn, thrs is any ply for :111 the ,fnl19.v1(r>7s 21-21 :City of Kenai C'*nf* 094 - 7 /WRI ) i 21,20.270-21.20.200 (1) Public liability insurancu protecting both the City and/or Ito agunte find the lessee, ouch insurance to be ovidonced by a cortificato ohowing the insurance in force. The aimnllnt of nosh public liability insurance ohall have limits not loan than those known no $5009000/$1,000,000/ $250,000. (2) Liquor liability (where applicable). (3) Len000 agrees to carry employer's liability insurance and Workmen's Compensation insurance, and to furnish a certificate thoreof to the City, if applicable. (4) Insurance contracts providing liability insurance and Workmenlo Compensation shall provide for not leas than 30 days written notice to the City of cancellation, expiration, or substantial change in policy conditions and coverage. (5) Loaoua agrees that waiver of subrogation against the City shall be requested of leaeoe's insurer, and shall be provided at no cost to the City. (6) Cross Liability: It is understood and agreed that the inaurance afforded by this policy or policieo for more than one named insured, shall not operate to increase the limits of the company's liability# but otherwise shall not operate to limit or void the coverage of any one named insured as respects claims against the same named insured or employees of such other named insured. (7) The inourance procured by the lesone as heroin required shall be issued in the name of the LeGaa a and the City by a company licensed to do buoiness in the State of Alaska, and shall contain endorsements t hat s D ] such insurances may not be cancelled or amended with respect to the City without 30 days written notice by registered or certified mail to the City by the lnournnce company; and (ill lessseu ahall be solely rouponaible for payment of premiumo and that City shall not be required to pay any prtlmiums for ouch insurances. (0) The amount of insurance cover;agoa required above may be subject to review for increaoe at each five year renegotiation of the limas. (9) Upon review by the City, the lessee may be required to obtain such other insurallo" protecting the City and leonee than may bu 11(tcosrlartly requiroelt or advi3ablez. Ordo 258, 400. 531, 909) 21,20,290 innur-►nr,�: of 11sern-Subt,�nants: Lpuslrla, for its own proleet tuff, #;lay r(1yu1 r,s ttuna t tri,t 1751tr; ritiori an/1 :subtufs.lnt s to 'a%erutrt ;10,1rrt,ment11 hit Wifig I0113lae hstrmt/sure frain action, firi,iIsle] out of 'Juer'1; oprrat ions -ind may rgqutr(f ouch bona ftlift pujllle U'ir.'r'S s11111 'iliht"flarlt1) tit sshpw proof of pl;btlr, ttab iLit-f trial) P016drirlg oleic .V*frat tor►" 0" the rtrsmlued premisers in uljc: l 'imoli lt'i S13 V111 L protNQ; th,fal• Mr,j 531 ) iy • 1f Nrnsli Suss. ,f24 2. 4:84, 1 us 0 21.20.290-21.20.340 14 21.20.290 Annual Renort: The lessee may be required to submit to the City each year on or about March 15, an annual report on its operations, particularly those services and facilities offered to the public, whether on a fee or non -fee basis. (Ord 531) 21.20.300 Arbitration: In the event the City and lessee shall be unable to agree as to any matter provided for in the lease except as to the amount of the 5 year rent redetermination amount which is handled pursuant to KMC 21.10.130 such dispute shall be determined, upon request of either the City or the lessee, by 3 disinterested arbitrators, (unless the parties can agree on one arbitrator) designated by the American Arbitration Association and in accordance with the rules of such Association. The arbitrators designated and acting under this lease shall make their award in strict conformity with such rules and shall have no power to depart from or change any of the provisions thereof. The expense of arbitration proceedings conducted hereunder shall be borne equally by the parties. The proceedings shall take place in Kenai, Alaska, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. (Ord 531) 21.20.310 Modifications of Existing Leases: Leases shall only be modified to that extent deems to be necessary to protect the public's interest. (Ords 400, 531) 21.20.320 Unauthorized Removal of Material Prohibited: Any person, firm, or corporation who without written authority from the City removes rock, gravel, or other material from the lands owned by the City without the express consent of the City shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Any criminal action taken against such person shall not preclude the institution of civil proceedings by the City. (Ord 531) 21.20.330 Removal Not Authorized By Lease: No deed or lease granted by the City to any person shall contain terms or be construad as granting any right to remove material from City lands. (Ord 531) 21.20.340 Disposition of Riaht3 By Council: In recognition that conaitions may exist from time to time whereby use of such lands and the material comprising the same may be beneficial to the public interest and promote t a progress and development of the Cit•_ , applications for use thereof ::ay be received and con3lduvod b l the City ,:anacer, gravid-`4 Ouch ap:-licatio:t:; full,' 3iac135e to the C , all-atzrial factz inc: plan:, for th-2 proposed use. a::7_ lizatteno :hall :)e consistent with the C�xnprehensi•:c Plan of th2 City and ri-forrod to he ?lannin4 Commi:,3ion Lt! Di3!7O3Lt1Jn of :iuca applications :all 7e ^:aw,_ u•; t!:, �_-sunc:.l attar racon;ronast.-n .rcm the ?�.c:1n1"• :=ntzz'�.Qi and .:�? Lim. �fana'?r. (Ord 331) / Sucp- *3 - 6/20/3^) K � J N 21.20.350 21.20.350 Penalties: (a) it is unlawful for any person to violate any of the provisions of this chapter and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in an amount not exceeding $100. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such hereunder. (b) In addition to or as an alternative to the above penalty provision, the City may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $100 per day for the violation of any provision of this chapter and seek injunctive relief for any infraction thereof for which the offending party will be charged for reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by the City as awarded by the court. (c) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to restrict the City's exercise of any of its rights pursuant to the lease agreement including those enumerated in KMC 21.15.080 and 21.15.090 hereof. (Ord 531) 1 (City of Vanai Supp. -13 - 6/20/90) 21-24 C- c-� Suggested by: City Council CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA SETTING A POLICY REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF COSTS OF STREETS, WATER AND SEWER, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ASSESSED TO BENEFITED PROPERTY OWNERS. WHEREAS, the Council desires that property owners pay all or a portion of improvements to streets, water and sewer, and other such improvements that benefit private properties, and WHEREAS, assessments to property owners will result in a more equitable distribution of City resources, and will allow grant monies to be used for more projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING GENERAL POLICY IS ADOPTED FOR GUIDANCE TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION AND THE PUBLICS r_ Section 1: Water and sewer lateral construction in the City of Kenai shall result in assessments against benefited properties at the rate of 50% of l a S—*44 costs. However, if a substantial portion of properties in a proposed assessment district is owned by one or a few common owners, or it appears to the Council that the owners are acting as developers, the assessment shall be at 100% of costs. Section 2s Cost of construction of water and sewer main interceptor lines will generally not be assessed against properties. Section 3s Street, sidewalk, storm drain, 14-ht and other improvements shall result in assessments against benefited properties at the rate of of costs. Section 4s In certain circumstances, the City Council may determine that it is in the best interest of the City to make certain improvements, including water, sewer, or street improvements, without assessment in order to enhance orderly development or for other purposes. �-p- 1 e I Section 5s All construction projects are subject to availability of monies, both for the assessed and non -assessed portions. Nothing in this resolution is meant to give assurance that such monies will be available. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI$ ALASKA this 3rd day _.- of April, 1985. f TOM WAGONER, MAYOR r 4 1• .: V .I' 0 0 CITY OF KENAI " Od (?sp ial 4 4"" 210 FIDALQO KINAI, ALASKA 90011 TBLBPMONB!!3. M5 MEMO TO: Kenai City Council ' FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director ec,.j DATE: March 25, 1985 SUBJECT: Assessment District - Aliak/McCollum On March 19, 1985, the City received a revised petition for a water and sewer assessment district in the Aliak/McCollum area. The petition asked for the assessments to be limited to 20% of actual costs. in addition, as with the first petition we received on February 5, 1985, it is contingent upon the validity of a rezoning petition. The scope of the water and sewer improvements requested by the petition is smaller than that planned by the City. The benefitted lots, as requested by the petition, number 72. Therefore, 36 valid signatures are required. I believe that we have at least 39 valid signatures. The petition appears to be valid, pending the validity of the rezoning petition. You can review the map that is enclosed marked "Planned by City" and see the difference from that "Requested by Petition." The lots that are benefited by the water and sewer improvements, as planned by the the City, number 89. They are listed in detail on the two enclosed printouts. One printout shows legal descriptions, names, and addresses of benefitted property owners. The other printout serves as a preliminary assessment roll. A review of the preliminary assessment roll shows that the City expects total costs of the water and sewer improvement to be about $1,352,000 (excluding design). The City expects to assess 502 of that cost, or about $676,000. Mote that this is not what was requested by the petitioners; they requested an assessment of 202 of cost. All property owners will be given instructions on how to protest. s, l F I Page 2 The City Administration concludes that this project is desirable, and urges approval of an assessment district, as is being currently designed. at 50Y. of cost. The assessed portion is to come from the 1983 bond authorization. That authorization was for 04,000,000 of assessment bonds. We sold 02,850,000 of the bonds in 1984. That leaves $1,130,000 available. This project would use 0676,000 of these available bonds. The non -assessed portion is planned to be derived from a D.E.C. grant, which has been applied for. The City Administration believes that the prospects of receiving such a grant are good. if we do not receive the D.E.C. grant, we could use the $650,000 water and sewer grant received from the Department of Administration. Below is a tentative schedule of how the administration intends to proceeds ; Date Action r 4-03-85 Manager report 4-03-85 Preliminary assessment roll 4-03-85 get hearing for May 1, 1985 4-12-85 Advertise and individual --- i4-19-85 noticeAdvertise 4-26-85 Advertise 4-29-85 Advertise 5-01-85 hearing on resolution approving district J- LmlI 4w V Ir 6w V V I V V PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PAflCEL N OWNER 045-010-10 KP8 045-020-05 ENNIS, DUN & SHARON Q45-020s08-JARLAS.._GE080E._.. 045-030-01 ENNIS, DON & SHARON 045-030-05 STARNES & JANOUSEK 04%-03Q-OR „AmE 045-030-09 REMSER, LARRV, ROBERT & SARAH 045-030-11 REMBER, LARRV & ROBERT 04$-030-1a R Egg LgQRY• RQQRT_& ARAH 045-030-13 LONG, OMAR & BERNICE 045-030-14 045-030-16 COURTNEY, WILLIAM & PEQOY HUF, JAN 045-030-17 _ OTTEN, RICHARD & BETTY 045-030-18 OTTEN, RICHARD & BETTY 049-040-og MEVQR� ReGEB ANNEIIE 045-040-04 ALLMON, MARY 045-040-05 PAULSEL, TIM & MAY 045-Qd"- A DENALI MOBtLr- HOME$, INC- 045-040-07 MURPHY, JAMES 045-040-M WHITE, CARL & PAMELA .045=Q4n-_1- ON .& .K RN 045-040-11 ROBERS, RAMON & KAREN 045-040-12 SONSERO, RUSSELL Q43-04�i3�1jly9ERi , RUSSELL 045-040-14 045-040-15 BURTON KATHY HOESCHN, PHILLIP & JUDY •043-030-0L MUmt__RALCH & VIOLS? 045-MO-02 WARD, WALTER 045-050-04 NATHANSON$ RONALD & MARCIA Q4s-e$Q�6 WARDS WAS �p A CD LEEK 045-050-07 MCCOLLUM, FLORINE 045-050-09 SEA LION CORP. ,Q43-O5A-10 PIATT, DDANIEL 045-030-ll MCCOLLUM, FLORINE 049-050-12 BALDWIN, BARBARA 0A5_050_2_AMLoW1N. C.R. 090-050-16 LEIQH, VESTA 045-050-17 COOK, CHESTER & HONORA Q445.-030_-1fl_MUNBEB._ ftUREN 045-050-19 BEA LION CORP. 045-050-20 SEA LION CORP. D45=060-OL_BASLEY,�I-BU SSELLANMRO 045-060-02 BARLEY, N. RUSSELL & MILDRED 045-060-04 HOLLMAN, MRS. KARL Qg _1nHN 045-060-07 MEEHAN. JOE i 100% 100% 100% 50% �. -._ __._-._-_._. WATER -SEWER--_ _ WA1ER_... _SEWER__- -.TOTAL . _ _ _ _.TO1 AL 80. FT. 90. FT. ASSFSS ASSESS ASSESS ASSESSIc i 46,504_ -__ 4b,5Q0_ _ _ 30.281._ ._... IQ,674 _ _ _ 20,955 _-10,470 198,000 19S,000 43,719 45,453 89,232 44,616 22,500 22,500 4,975 5,165 10,140 5,070 - _ 22, 500. w-22, 500 _._-_ . 9.975 __ __ .. 3,165 ._ . _ 10,140 . ___ _ 5, 070 49,500 49,500 10,945 11,363 22,308 11,154 76,500 76,500 16,914 17,561 34,415 17,238 9,787 9,787 2,164 ?_,247 4,411 3,206 63,585 63,585 14,059 14,596 28,655 14,328 Q, 78A 9, 78� 2,._14_4___..__ 2, 247 _ 4, �{ 11 • -- L�-'`��y - -- 49,005 49,005 10,835 11,2n0 ?7.,085 11,043 - • - ;1 39,204 39,204 8,668 9,000 17,668 8,834 13.Q¢Q�p68 2,889 ,�,qpp _3,811.9..--•_3,94�, _ . 13,093 13,093 2,895 3,006 5,901 2,951 + 13,093 13,093 2,895 3,006 5,901 2,951 0 0 65,175 0 14,410 0 14,410 7,205 I" 13,225 13,225 2,924 3,036 5,960 2,9130 ' E.E.,boo e.6,b00 14,.7 6�1S,E8R�2A,SZ35��.15,A08----..__.._...,...- - 44,550 44,350 9,850 10,227 20,077 10,039 49,500 49,500 10,945 11,363 22,308 11,154 46,221 46, 221 A!1,220 IQ, 612 -_-. 209930 --1Q, 415 36,590 36,590 8,090 6,400 16,490 8,245 1 41,382 41,382 9,150 9,500 18,650 9,325 41.,b.4Z 416697 9w4Q�4. s60 1�926% 91 $84 , 19,048 0 4,212 0 4,212 2,106 _ . _ 39,259 0 8,680 0 8,680 4,340 .r 12, 3z5_ _ 12, 21373 2,236 2, 841--_ 5,577.__. S, 789 .. i 12,375 12,375 2,736 2,841 5,577 2,789 i 49,005 49,003 10,835 11,250 22,085 11,043 ' 66,600 b6,boo 1a,Z26�._1;�a289_39015� J50008 66,600 66,600 14,726 15,289 30,015 15,008 22,500 22,500 4,975 5,165 10,140 5,070 , as*500 22,50o 4,.2Z5. 5,169 10,149 _.. 59070 49,500 49,500 10,945 11,363 22,30U 11,154 12,375 12,375 2,736 2,841 5,577 2,709 12,379___ 12.875.._ 2,7.36 .2,841 5, ;7L_-_._2,789 13,075 13,075 2,891 3,001 5,893 2,946 13,081 13,081 2,892 3,003 5,895 2,948 2,948 41,626 41,626 9,204 9,556 18,760 9,380 41,622 41,622 9,203 9,555 18,759 9,379 �.. 70,68b._70,686 _15,629- _16,22Z _ _.31,856 15,920 - 88,357 88,357 19,536 20,203 39,819 19,910 46,662 46,662 10,317 10,712 21,029 10,515 {I 42,174,_._42,17.4_._._ 99328 _-94681_ _._... 190006 .. _.. 96503 33,330 33,330 7,369 7,651 15,020 7,510 r ' 045-060-09 MCCULL.UM, GLEN & F.A. 30,690 30,690 6,706 7,045 13,031 6,916 ' 4%460-11-MCCOLLUMv-GLEN-&•F.A. -.... _-... 1b,830-- - __--. 0. .._-3,721 ---•- •---0-----.3,721 1,061 • ' 045-060-14 FRYKHOLM, VERN It ETHEL 17,501 17,501 3,870 4,016 7,880 3,944 4 ' 045-060-15 PRYKHOLM, VERN & ETHFL 17,301 17,501 3,870 4,018 7,808 3,944 045,070-OL -.• KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ••--•-- •- •- ---- .-_.-.45,000 ---- 45,000 ---- 9,950 - - . 10,330 20,2f10 10,140 045-070-03 COOK INLET REGION, INC. 49,500 49,500 10,945 11,363 2?,308 t1,134 045-070-04 MOONEY, MILDRED 49,500 49,500 1o,94b 11,363 22,308 11,154 " 45=080.-OL-FERGUS014_ ED..&_Gl ORIA- - 49j 300 --.--.. 49, S00 -.• -- .40, 945 .. --.. -1 L, 363 22,308 11,154 045-090-02 TEEPLES, FRISCILLA 45,000 45,000 9,950 10,330 20,ZN0 10,140 045-090-03 DEARMAN, ADAM 44,550 44,550 9,850 10,227 20,077 10,039 °--045e-090-OS.-HANSEN,-PETER 28,875..... .._ 0 6,304 0 6,304 3,192 045-090-13 BOYLE, OWEN & FLEUR 12,136 10,136 2,693 2,786 5,469 2,7'33 " 045-090-14 SCHUITT, GEORGE 12,134 12,134 2,683 2,785 5,468 2,734 45=Q90-13 gCHUITTr_ GEORGE_ _ _ -12,13A. ��12,134 .-._.._ 2, 683 _-_ _._-2, 78S _ __..8, 468 - 2,734 045-090-16 MOON, DALE & WEGLASE, LAURIE 38,472 30,472 8,506 8,032 17,338 8,669 �► 043-090-19 WALSH, JOHN & LYNNE 12,637 12,637 2,794 2,901 5,695 2,840 -045-0S0e20_-WALBH,_JOkIN� LYNNE_... _-...._..._.___._...-..-------10,4D0 _. _.10,400 ._..-.. 2,299 .. - 2,307 4,686 2,343 ' 045-090-22 MAYES, JACK & JEANNE 12,637 12,637 2,794 2,901 5,695 7,048 ' 045-090-23 BROECKEL, DALE & PENNY 10,400 10,400 2,299 2,387 4,6116 2,34.1 ' 04S`090 24-BUZiELL,.HARVEY JOAN_ 46,200 46,200 10,213_____-10,606 ___.._..20,021 . 10,411 045-090-25 MORRIS, PAT & MARSHALL, SUZANNE 36,960 36,960 8,170 8,484 16,b56 8,328 045-090-26 SCHMIDT, ROGER & BARBARA 13,531 13,531 2,992 3,106 6,098 3,049 ' .043=.090-27__WR ISHT.,_DDNALo ._. -_._ _ 18, 53L .13, 531. _._2, 992 . -..-3,106 .. ... 6, 09U 3,049 ' 045-090-28 KEMPF, EUGENE 12,960 12,960 2,866 2,975 5,841 -,921 045-090-31 KEMPF, EUGENE 13,531 13,531 2,992 3,106 6,098 3,049 2-090-34 ...HAVES, _DARREL. 5904Q0 59.,9.00 13,439636 045-090-35 SCHMIDT, ROGER & BARBARA i1,699 11,699 2,507 2,686 5,273 2,637 4 048-NO-36 SCHMIDT, ROGER & BARBARA 13,566 13,566 3,000 3,114 6,114 3,057 ' 4S_110_OB_...E'OBS,_AR.THUR_. __.-__36,335 36,33'; 8,.034.._.___.-8,341 _....-.16,378 _.- . _ 8,100 045-110-10 GRAHAM, DONALD 4,500 4,500 995 1,033 P-,028 1,014 045-110-19 BUZZELL, HARVEY & JOAN 44,195 44,195 9,772 10,145 19,917 9,959 ' 3=L1030._GRME-BRE.TM&EN_MRrH a 3S 4r-1 Q a ,.IZ __.0^-_-9,Z22._-.._4,8U6 045-110-21 MANZEK, GUNTER & INBRED 12,459 12,459 2,755 2,860 5,615 2,808 045-110-26 VETERANS AFFAIRS 12,023 12,023 2,658 2,760 5,418 2,709 AS=11O 30_.-THE-8RETHREN- . l4, 4B8 0 __-.16,470 _-__-- 0 _ -.... 16, 470 - . _ .. 0, 235 043-230-01 KAMSTRA, WALTER 47,045 0 10,402 0 10,40a 5,201 045-230-02 KAMSTRA, WALTER 88,427 0 19,552 0 19,:sp- 9,776 45130-05 i LSOM, AIME 48,10Q 48,100_-.10,63+ +1,042 _._. 21,677. _ __10,G39 045-230-06 HOLMES, LOWELL & MARIE 33,150 33,150 7,930 7,610 14,940 7,470 b 045-230-07 SONDURANT, DALE 41,382 41,382 9,150 9,500 18,650 9,3i45 D45=s^3"- 9_EI88t_A9BEMBLY_"OD.-INC• 33.541 33,541_-_._..._..7,416..._ .--7.700 .-__ lS,itb.. 7,550 045-230-09 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF BUD, INC. 35,719 35,719 7,698 8,200 16,098 8,049 b 045-230-10 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD, INC. 37,026 37,026 8,187 8,500 16,687 0,344 TOTAL 3,215,179 2,791,837 710,896 640,893 I,35i. 791 ^ 675,914 ` w V V -; ' �..�:t:•.0 �._ Y .. _.•J J.�1���..r) _•._._O �-_..'_CJU..N �eI. .�1 �. ..� j Jj ._7.(1 iic•1�.. . � ' -PRFEifi1INAR�=A88E88MENT-ROCtr m C----------- PARCEL N LEGAL UWNLR ADOitf R8 ...045-010-03._PQR...SEC._33,_T6N. - ALASKA _ __ ... __. POUCH C, .JUNE:AU, AK 99801 045-010-10 POR. SEC. 93, T6N KPS BOX 850, SOL.UUTNA, AK 99669 045-020-05 GOVT. L.6, SEC 33 ENNIS, DUN & SHARON BOX 1064, SEWARD, AK 99664 SLURUE .. .. ....__.... BOX 4971, KENAI, AK. 99611 045-030-01 GOVT. L.16, SEC. 33 ENNIS, DON & 914ARON BOX 1064, SEWARD, AK 99664 045-030-05 GOVT. L.179 SLC. 33 STANNES & JANUIIDEK BOX 3692, KENAI, AK 99611 _042430D CCOLLUM, _FLORINS.._... DRAWER 3293, . KENAI• AK 99611.. 045-030-09 POR. SOV. L.13, SEC. 33 REMBER, LARRY, RUOERT & SARAII SOX 2953, KENAI, AK 99611 045-030-11 POR. OOV. L.13, SEC. 33 REMBER, LARRY & ROBERT BOX 2953, KENAI, AK 99611 t.ARRY..RtIVERT &.PARAH__ BOX 29530 KENAI, AK 99l.11 045-030-13 HALF L.19, SEC. 33 LONG, OMAR & BERNICE BOX 1234, SOLDOfNA, AN 99669 045-030-14 HALF L.19, SEC. 33 COURTNEY, WILLIAM & PEBSY BUX 3751, KENAI, AN 99611 .0.43_030_-16_KAROINAL_SUSD."3,..B1 HUFa»+1AN__.._ _.__ 611_HAOIC..ST„_KENAI, AK 77411 045-030-17 KARDINAL BUDD., LP, 81 OTTEN, RICHARD & BETTY 2031 SHEPHEROIA OR, ANC11ORADE, AK 99504 045-030-18 KAROINAL BUBO., L1, 81 OTTEN, RICHARD & BETTY 2031 SHEPHERDIA OR, ANCHORAGE, AK 99504 M!`MF.14,' ROGEkcAr-ANNEi3E---- ._-.. 00#M 9034r•'SM-DOINAt"AK-99669 045-040-04 POR. GOVT Lt 9, DEC 33 ALLMON, MARY BOX 1755, KENAI, AK 99611 045-040-05 POR. GOVT LT 9, SEC 33 PAULSEL, TIM & MAY BOX 2255, SOLDOTNA, AK 99669 _093=090�6,DOYI�L.210 C-33 QENALI_MUSTIE Ho. go INC. ____.5.8UNNABSON_.RO..,._WORCESIER•.-MA._01606..-.. 045-040-07 GOVT. L.22, SEC 33 MURPHY, JAMES BOX 4-1282, SPENARD, AK 99503 045-040-08 GOVT. L.23, SEC 33 WHITE, CART- & PAMELA BOX 412, KENAI, AK 99611 ._P ;.040=W_.pIALT S1J8Qa�LT-1_ _ _ROSERB,_RAMON It KAREN._. __. BOX.3309, KENAI, . AK. 99611_- _ 045-040-11 045-040-12 PIATT BUBO LT 2 SONSERB SUM., RUDER$, RAMON & KAREN BOX 3309, KENAI, AK 99611 LT 1 SONBERG, RUSSELL 410 CINDERELLA LN., KENAI, AK 99611 045-040-13 - SQN�? !!BR•, LTA RON9ER04_.R1.l1TBRLI ____ .410.CINQERELI,.A.LN.,-KENAI,. AK 9_96t l 04:-040-14 JENNY LYNN SUBD., LT 1 BURTON, KATHY BOX 1792, KENAI, AK 99611 045-040-15 JENNY LYNN SUED., LT 2 HOESCHEN, PHILLIP & JUDY BOX 3977, SOLOOTNA, AK 99669 _Q4:e�03SL-OL.LI.1,. GINDBRELLA_8U8D. _ MUMM,..RALPli1C. Y2OLET........._ _ 80X. 3056,.KENAI,._AK.99611 . 045-050-02 LT 2, CINDERELLA SUED. WARD, WALTER STAR RT. 1, FOX 90, KENAI, AK 99611 045-050-04 W 1/2 GOV. LT 35, SEC 33 NATHANSON, RONALD & MARCIA 8340 E. 111H COURT, ANCHURARE, A1< 99504 SAS: 030._06_ROVT. LT 240 9EC 33 WARD*-WALIER & COLLEEN BOX 4ZB7.4. KENA14._AK_$9611...._- .._._ 045-050-07 GOVT. LT 33, SEC 33 MCCOLLUM, FLORINE DRAWER 3293, KENAI, AK 99611 045-050-09 GOVT. LT 38, SEC 33 SEA LION CORP. SOX 44, HOOPER BAY, AK 99604 _S§5.03SL-3.0_iiOSIZ.a.J "i"EC_.33 EIATT, t1ANIEL___-_._... DOX._44339 .KENAI+_AK. 99611 045-050-11 045-050-12 GOVT. LT 40 SEC 33 CINDERELLA tUSO., MCL•OLLUM, FLORINS DRAWER 3293, KENAI, AK 99611 LT 3 BALDWIN, BARBARA BOX 1104, KENAI, AK 99611 A Se�NIQF.RELLA SURD., LT 4 DA1.0RM-CA, 045-050-16 HUTTO SUBD., LT 1 LEISH, VESTA BOX 945, SOLOOTNA, AK 99669 045-050-17 HUTTO BUBO., LT 2 COOK, CHESTER & HONORA SOX 278, NINILCHIK, AK 99639 _Qgpzgp-IB HUT70 307..HUT.IO_AVE.,_KENAI; AK.99611 045-050-19 ENCHANTED FOREST StISO., LT 1 SEA LION CORP. BOX 44, HOOPER BAY, AK 99604 045-050-20 ENCHANTED FOREST SUBD., LT 2 SEA LION CORP. BOX 44, HOOPER BAY, AK 99604 045-060-01 OOVT�Lj�2,�EC1 3� BAt Y�I._BIdSSE!!._ds MII.DRFO_-BOX 421,..SOLOOTHA, AK 99b42. -0 0-02 GOVT. LT 31, SEC 33 BAGLEY, N. RUSSELL & MILDRED .....__ _..._... _ . BOX 421, SOLOOINA, AK 99669 045-060-04 GOVT. LT 29, SEC 33 HOLLMAN, MRS. KARL 1070 OUBLIN RD, COLUMBUS OH 43y15 045-060-05 POR. WV LT.28, SgG $3 MORAN"RIIN -_5 OUNNARSUN RO.,-WORCESTER, MA 01606 045-069-07 FOR. OOV LT 27, SEC 33 MEEHAN, JOE _ 5 GUNNARSON RD., WORCESTER, MA 01606 F-- 045-060-09 POIl. GOV LT' H6, HF.C. 33 MCCOLLUM, ULEN & F.A. hiIAWFR 3293, KENAI, Ali 991,11 '-.048s060a11_POR...13OV.LT. 259 GEC. 33 MCCOLL.UM, OLEN &.E.A.___-_-._. _DRAWER 3293, KENAI, AK.99611.. ^ 045-060-14 1REFIOP EHIATES, LT. 2 FllYIQI(ILM, VERN & E'111FL 1119 S. VINKIEY, 0101 045-060-15 TREETOP ESTAiF9, LT. 3 FRYKHOI.M, VERN G ETHEI 1G9 S. BINKI.EY, N101 '._.045r070-01--POR.-.SEL. 34 .. KENAI.1'LNINGULA.BURODUH .. BOX OLD,.SOLOOTNA, AK 99669 045-070-03 LT. 37, SEC. 34 COOK INIEI REGION, INC. BOX 4-N, ANCHORAGE, AK 99309 045-070-04 GOVT. LT. 39, SEC. 34 MUUNLY, MILDRED BOX 3264, KENAI, AK 99611 _..045=0SQ-rO$. OOVT...LT._36,_SEC....34--FERGUSON,- ED &_GLORIA... ST..Rt.. 1• BOX 13369.KENAI,. AK 9?/atI " 045-090-02 GOVT. LT. fj5, SEC. 34 TEEPLES, FRISCILLA IG16 INDIAN 7R, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407 045-090-03 GOVT. LT. 54, SEC. 34 DEARMAN, ADAM 2007 E. 38TH AVE., ANCHORAGE, AK 99504 " 045-.09Q-OS__POR._I30V 1T._Ii3,_SEC._34"_ ^. HANSEN,. PLIER U.. - _ _. .. BOX 13YO, KENAI, AK. 99611 - 045-090-13 JAMES BUBO., LT. 2 BOYLE, OWFN f. FLEUR RT, 1, BOX 1530, KrMAI, AK 99611 045-090-14 JAMES BUBO., LT. 3 SCHIIITI, GCIIRsE P.O. BOX 1391, ANCHURAGE, AK 99510 !!-M-'Z _dW98_8UB0., LT- 4 I3CHUIIT•_BEORGE_.. _-._.__P.4._609_13919._ANCH0RA(4F_,.AK993f0___ 045-090-16 JAMES BUBO., LT. I MOON, DALE G WESLADE, LAURIE BOX 4117, KENAI, AK 99611 %w 045-090-19 KEITH BUBO., LT 3 WALSH, JOIN & LYNNE BOX 122, HOMER, AK 99603 ' 09'e�:g�: �3,LSliiTl�.81J8RuJ,ib QH9.JOI1N.& LYNNE_ - _ 045-090-22 KEITH BUBO., LT 4 HAYES, JACK 1. JEANNE BOX 45, KENAI, AK 99611 045-090-23 KEITH BUDD., LT 5 BROECKF.L, DALE & PENNY BOX 3116, KENAI, AK 99611 ' -24._.POR. �iO.Y__LLS9.._BEC...34. SUZZELL,-HARVEX_&_JOAN_._._---416-MCCULLOM. DR...-KENAI,..AK-- 090-25 POR. GOV LT 59, SEC. 34 MORRIS, PAT & MARSHALL, SUZANNE BOX 2205, KENAI, AK 99611 k- 045-090-26 KEMPF BUDD., LT 5, BLK l SCHMIDT, ROGER & BARBARA BOX 358, KENAI, AK 99611 _Q45=12Q--'Z....KF.MP_E..9UDD..•...LT. 8,. OLK I..____...WRIOHI,_DONALQ �.BOX�9.�e1.s�90LDOJNA• AK-99669 _ 045-090-28 KEMPF BUBO., LT 2, BLK I KEMPF, EUBENE BOX 503, KENAI, AK 99611 Ir 045-090-31 KEMPF SUED., LT 6, BLK I KEMPF, EUBENE BUX 503, KENAI, AK 99611 4ff=Q2Qr_34e._POB_2"r.._S3tiSEC- 24 �AXEB��ARRE1 bQ3 lIfI1,SlYE.I~[Blsl.�� KENAia_(1K_9tih11.....__ . 045-090-35 KEITH BUBO., LT IA SCHMIDT, ROGER & BARBARA BOX 350, KENAI, AK 99611 fr 045-090-36 KEITH BUBO., LT 2A SCHMIDf, ROGER & BARBARA BOX 338, KENAI, AK 99611 ' 4S.:1IQ-.S>'II_.Poll -0 lL TO-91,_.i3EC-39. FQ00q..M:LHU8___ #!1 141T•_JSI:NAIa_AK_99611...___._.... 045-I10-10 POR GOV LT. 80, SEC 34 GRAHAM, DONAL.D BOX 416, KENAI, AK 99611 •fir ' 045-110-19 POR BOY LT. 83, SEC 34 SUZZELL, HARVEY & JOAN BOX 3640, KENAI, AN 99611 ' .42=1.1Q_2Q_P08.A LI._e3, 09C as GRACE_SREJJIM.-CHIJBCH RR9W 9?Q,_ISENAi...Ali. 99bls_ .._..-•-.------.• -• -- 045-110-21 DYE BUDD. 02, LT i MANZEK, GUNTER & INBRED BOX 2615, KENAI, AK 99611 Ar 045-110-26 DYE BUBO. N2, LT 6 VETERANS AFFAIRS 235 E. BTH AVE., ANCHORAGE, AN 99501 it4Ai-_.I 0_-S0._ GRACE -BRETHREN- BEP..I.AT_. LT I THE_68E1HREN_HOME1'1I88SONs DRAWER-3920, _KENAI.,.. AK 99611 . 045-230-01 BELUGA SUED., LT 1, BI_K 2 KAMSTRA, WALTER 910 BENCH CT., ANCHORAGE, AK 99w04 Log045-230-02 BELUGA BUDD., LT 2, BLK 2 KAMSTRA, WALTER 910 BENCH CT., ANCHORAGE, AK 99!44 43-230-03 eELUBA.-SUBD"-LL-?.;_BL K_I--- 11 SON,_,IUNE____,. _ 4265-EASTRIOGE_DR..-ANCHORAGE., -Ali 99.504- ' 045-230-06 BELUGA SUBD., LT 3, BLK 3 HOLMES, LOWELL & MARIE BOX 277, KENAI, AK 99611 L+ 045-230-07 BELUGA SUED., LT 1, SL.K 4 BONDURANT, DALE SR-1, BOX 2516, CHUGIAK, AK 99567 AS-�30r08_..BELUBA_SUBO._s...LT_2,..•BLK_4FIRST-.ASOEMBLIL.OE_GOD,.. INC.___._.. DRAWER .12604_.KENAI, . AK.99611 045-230-09 BELUGA BUBO., LT 3, BLK 4 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD, INC. DRAWER 1260, KENAI, AK 99611 `. 045-230-10 BELUSA BUDD., LT 4, BLK 4 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD, INC. DRAWER 1260, KENAI, AK 99611 = i �' �� � /Loy' ;,, c . i �...• � f p i t: a �:p�N�.1f',eJ fir, P�f,•y-;on '"'K� ,.f A ON 1 1•�/ 4 I ' (� 1•K GI 6j r•� �NAICA7ES REQue5TE� GU,�tE1Q s -- SEweR /mP.eovemeNTs Lo.. • 7071 ' PIq qh ej I o _ 09 14. 15' - --- - --- , . r.6 4 - ii i I a f i� --•..a.�l::rinA�«.isw'�w.�.'..=.....-�.,...r':+.:.sc-^—�.r..�--s+.'D:YY.i:..Y�:.a:.�.-F; t.a.-z�cs._t�..�;`-`7'.��_ _ _ _ - _ Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-30 I A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SETTING A DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ALIAK/McCOLLUM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. j i WHEREAS, the City has been petitioned to establish an assessment district for water and sewer improvements in the Aliak/McCollum area project, and WHEREAS. the City must hold a public hearing to allow comment on the proposed assessment district before proceeding with the project. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD ON MAY 1. 1985, AT THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF KENAI FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IN THE ALIAK/MeCOLLUM AREA. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 3rd day of April. 1995. { TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk 0 I M 11 C _ i 0 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI. ALASKA TRANSFERRING MONEY IN THE 1984-1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OVERTIME FOR THE BALANCE OF THIS FISCAL YEAR. WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that municipalities must pay overtime at no less than one and one-half the normal hourly pay for certain employees that work in excess of 40 hours in a given workweek, and WHEREAS, the City Administration believes that Communication Department employees (dispatchers) that work twelve-hour shifts per Kenai Municipal Code 23.30.050(b)(3) are eligible for such overtime, and WHEREAS, monies are available in the Communications -Health Insurance account due to reduced health insurance costs in this department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1984-1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET: Transfer from: Communications - Health Insurance 112J.0.00 Transfer to: Communications - Overtime $ 9,000 Communications - PIERS 550 Communications - Workers Compensation Insurance 450 10 000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 3rd day of April, 1985. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance: TOM WAGONER. MAYOR Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-32 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT i THE FOLLOWING TRANSFERS OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1984-85 GENERAL FUND BUDGET: .- From: Library - Repairs $ 2,000 Library - Transportation 500 Other - Contingency 2,000 00 Tos Library - Communications $ 2,500 Public Works Administration - Communications 2,000 4 a 500 _J This transfer provides money for additional telephone expenses that were not anticipated in the annual budget. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 3rd day ' of April, 1985. TOM W GONE , MAYOR 0 i ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finances e24 N f �— �� ( Suggested by% Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-34 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1984-85 AIRPORT LAND SYSTEM BUDGETs Froms M & 0 - Contingency JJ4.000 Tot M & 0 - Overtime $ 12,000 M & 0 - PERS 1,250 M & 0 - Workers Comp. Ins. 750 1 000 This transfer provides additional money for maintenance on the Airport, primarily due to snow removal. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 3rd day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR • J • r n .. e , �� --_- - � lYJ11111111111��.I.M110114. z ( KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH I'� 1 BOX 650 • SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 60669 �. _ PHONE 262.4441 fia •.. ba STAN THOMPSON MAYOR • April 1, 1985° 1� City of Kenai • Atten: Janet Whelan 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 RB: 1985 Liquor Application for Beachoomberts Steak House Dear Janet: I Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough withdraws its recommendation for the protest of the above noted liquor license. The applicant has paid in full the balance outstanding in personal property taxes, and has filed and paid the outstanding sales tax report for Peninsula Development. Additionally, Peninsula Development is now registered for business personal property taxation. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, �a4mela. McKee C �� Delinquent Acot. Techn. F I cc: Ed Lowry, Beachoomber's Steak House Q o 0 J DF.PART.'%fLNT OF REVLNt?L 201 EAST 9M. AVENUE ALCOMOLICBEVERAGECONTROL BOARD 1ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 March 21, 1985 Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai , 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Ms. Whelan, We are in receipt of the following application(s) for new liquor license(s) within the f Kenai You are being notified as require S 0 . 1. 0. IRESTAURANT/EATING PLACE BEACHCOMBER STEAKHOUSE; Edwin R. Lowry; Mile 10.5 Kenai Spur; MAIL: 10819 Kenai Spur, Suite 125, Kenai, Alaska 99611. i f 1 4 A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the -.: approval of the application(s) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the i �!J 9 l i board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of k reasonsTn support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS O4.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE MUNICIPALITY MUST COME FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS O4.11.420(b) munici- palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro- hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. ! If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.145(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to pro- test an application if a request is filed in writing within the original i 30-day period. If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sate or con- ' sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS O4.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. Sincerely, 41�G7 • Betty L. Calhoon Records & Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-863b BLC:vk Enc. r '� OQ Q a BILL SIIEff1ELD, GOVERNOR i 2O1 EAST 9W. AVENUE ALCOHOLICBEVERAGE:,'bM'ROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 March 21, 1985 Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai ' 210 Fidalgo a,QS Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Ms. Whelan, We are in receipt of the following application(s) for restaurant designation permit(s) within the Complete the enclosed applications and return to our office. NEW RESTAURANT/EATING PLACE Beachcomber Steakhouse Enclosed is a restaurant designation which allows access of persons under the age of 19 to enter a licensed premises for purposes of non-alcoholic related employment or dining. Pursuant to AS O4.16.049, the Alcoholic Beverage Contrcl Board, "with the approval of the governing body having jurisdiction and at the licensee's request, shall designate which premises are hotels, restaurants, or eating places only for purposes of this subsection." Sincerely, dL. Calhoon Records and Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 Enc. 0 r 0 ALLU110L IC LEVERAGE CUN1 R0L BOARD •:: RESTAURANT DESIGNATION PERMIT APPLICATION -AS O4.16.049 he granting of this permit allows access of persons under the age of 21 to designated licensed remises for purposes of dining or employment. If for employment, please state, in detail, aw the minor will be employed, duties, etc. (15 AAC 104.445(a)). he application is for designation of premises where persons 16 years and older may dine unaccompanied. persons under 16 yyrs. may dine accompan- ied by a person 21. year6 and older. persons between 16 and 19 years of age ',pplicant(s) /B/A (name o es ab s merit) address lours of operation "Coto xTelephone number 1 menu must accompany this application. Menu enclosed®, gave�P,o ce eyer been ca a to your premises by you or anyone else for any reason? Yes U No 04 If yes, date(s) and explanation(s). Ainors duties 0(5@twn6 / ;i d OAIL c l ) . t!_' =1A Ain I,�is� • c.+Jr4�.I�pK. ire video games available to the public on your premises? kto Jo you provide entertainment? Yes ❑ No 9 If yes,describe. :his permit remains in effect until expiration of the liquor license or at the discretion :)f the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. Renewal must be made in conjunction with the liquor license renewal. (15 AAC 104.445 (b)). I certify that I have read AS O4.16.049, AS O4.16.060, 15 AAC 110 d 15 AAC 104.445 and ap lave instructed my employees about provisions contePtiyarei ppl cat on approved: .overning Body Official ate: 4-912 (Rev 9/83) Subscribed me this of ry Pu c n an o Alaska commission expires _g—/-1- 156 _ D rector, ABC Boar Date: �j 1 1 .3 J ��• P ICEIVAI PENINSULA t°BORO4.lOG-1 BOX 850 SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669 PHONE 262.4441 `i 4 t STAN THOMPSON MAYOR I; March 27, 1985 -r, a, City of Kenai.! Atten: Janet Whelan 210 Fidalgo ..� Kenai, AK 99611 RE: 1985 Liquor License Application by Ed Lowry for Beachcomber's Steak House Dear Janet: Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough recommends that the City of Kenai protest the issuance of the above noted liquor license based upon unpaid taxes. We enclose a copy of Resolution 84-158 dated September 25, 1984, wherein the Borough may protest issuance of liquor licenses when the applicant is found to have sales tax and/or personal property tax account delinquencies. A review of tax accounts registered with the Borough in the name of Edwin Lowry are delinquent as follows: Account #11054 - Peninsula Development: Missing Sales Tax Report for period ending 12/84 Account 11-3607 - Edwin Lowry (personal property) Delinquent tax years 1931 through 1984. Total Due - $329.75 Additionally, we are unable to confirm that Peninsula Development has registered for business personal property taxation for the tax year 1985. it City of Kenai Page 2 A copy of this letter will be mailed to Edwin Lowry at 10819 Spur, Suite 125, Kenai, Alaska, on this date. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sinc ely, Pamela A. McKee Delinquent Acet. Techn. I' t f s.. f n n . J �f rr - l Kr=NAI PENINSULA 13C ROUGH 7 BOX BSO - SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 99669 M 's�pr_,• PHONE262.4441 STANTHOMPSON - MAYOR �•...ate h uj � _ - March 27, 1985 City of Kenai Atten: Janet Whelan 1, f 210 Fidaigo If Kenai, AK 99611 RE: 1985 Liquor License Renewal for Little Ski Ho Drive Inn -= Dear Janet: I Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough recommends that the City of Kenai protest the issuance of the above noted �1 liquor license based upon unpaid taxes. + " The Little Ski Mo Sales Tax Account, -� t, No. 10915, currently has a � balance outstanding in the amount of $4,489.37. This balance is i the result of unpaid sales taxes and penalties accrued for periods ending 7/84, 8/84 and 9/84. The repayment schedule for + the Little Ski Mo Sales Tax Account, No. 05610, is current through the March 10, 1985 payment. l A copy of this letter will be mailed to Ron Yamamoto, Drawer 4363, Kenai, Alaska, on this date. _:. Sincerely, Pamela A. McKee Delinquent Acet. Techn. _ f 1 4i'i c 1 CITY OF KENAI „od eat 4 4""-n 210 FIDALGO KENAI, ALA8KA 99611 TELEPHONE 283. 7535 February 11, 1985 Alcoholic Beverage Control Board 471 W. 36th, Suite 204 Anchorage, AK 99501 At their regular meeting of Feb. 6, 1985, the Kenai City Council ' recommended approval of renbwal of liquor licenses for the i following: Kenai Joe's _. American Legion Oaken Keg Merit Inn Rainbow Bar Pines The Council has requested a 30 day extension on the following: Little Ski No ; This application was received in this office Jan. 25, 1985, we will submit a decision by Feb. 21, 1985. Thank you. /janet Whelan, CMC City Clerk cc: Little Ski No Kenai Peninsula Borough jw y KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH 80X 850 • SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 99669 PHONE 262•4441 STANTHOMPSON MAYOR January 29, 1985j City of Kenai Zg27282g 04 • 210JaneFidalgon, City Clerkt/q?'1s A Kenai, AK 99611 M ''" o REs 1985 Liquor License Renewal for 91pit% Kenai Merit Inn Little Ski Mo Drive In Dear Janet: Please be advised that the Borough has not objection to the renewal of the Kenai Merit Inn liquor license. Their sales tax account is clear through the quarter ending 12/31/84 and their business personal property tax account is paid in full for the tax year 1984. Concerning the renewal application for Little Ski Mo Drive In, we request that you obtain a 30-day extension from the ABC Board in order to allow the owner sufficient time in which to resolve certain tax deficiencies. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. pSi,:nar,ely, 4. Pamela A. Mast Delinquent Acct. Techn. 9 OF &LAS a e!u SHEFF/EIE, C WAV0R DEPARTMENT OF REVi£NIIi£ 201 EAST OrN, AVENUE ALCOHOL COEVERAQECONTROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 00001 January 24, 1985 Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai "f, A,. r elf 210 fidalgo Qr` Kenai, Alaska 99611 I'rs ,r Dear Ms. Whelan, We are in receipt of the following applications) for renewal liquor licenses) within the Ou of You are being notified as required by AS 04.11.5ZO. BEVERAGE DISPENSARY LICENSE 6 e„r-S , .gyp a.,. a " Rainbow Bar 8 Grill �r �a vW RESTAURANT/EATING PLACE LICENSE Little Ski -No Drive In A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the applications) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the i r board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasonsTh support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, napricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS O4.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest, The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a format hearing in accordance with AS 44.62,330-44,62,630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, THE MUNICIPALITY MUST COME FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS O4,11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS O4.11.420(b) munici- palities must inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which pro- hibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time, Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 16 AAC 104,146(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to pro- test an application if a request, is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. I If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or con- sumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the relevant regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. i PROTEST UNDER AS 04,11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF I ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER i AS O4.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. f( BLC:vk Enc. �i { l �-a Sincerely, Betty aIhoon Records b Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 0 O 0 BILL SHEFFIELP, GOVERNOR 8L SE i 201 FAST BrH. AVENUE ALCOHOLICBEVERAQECONTROL BOARD ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 January 24, 1985 Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo''' v4ti' Kenai, Alaska 99611 , r Dear Ms. Whelan, We are in receipt of the following applications) for restaurant designation permit(s) within the CjtX gf Kanaj Complete the enclosed application(s) and return to our office. RENEWAL WI SSMANT/EATINGPLACE Little Ski-Mo Drive In Enclosed is a restaurant designation which allows access of persons under the age of 19 to enter a licensed premises for purposes of non-alcoholic related employment or dining. Pursuant to AS O4.16.0499 the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, "with the approval of the governing body having jurisdiction and at the licensee's request, shall designate which premises are hotels, restaurants, or eating places only for purposes of this subsection." Sincerely, '000�� Betty L CalNoon Records and Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 Enc. n1 s i M ' � %/.LYrrL L/V Ir r.//. r♦ ...A • a 1/-r •/•�•• /V �•.w•—n RESTAURANT DESIGNATIO14 PERMIT APPLICATION -AS O4.16.049 �"""`'3A 9 -=0 rile granting of this permit allows access of persons under the age of 21 to designated licensed )remises for purposes of dining or employment. if for employment, please state, in detail, low the minor will be employed, duties, etc. (15 AAC 104.445(a)). rhet)plication is for designation of premises where vq persons 16 years and older may dine unaccompanied. persons under 16 yrs. may dine accompan ❑ ied by a person 21. years and older. % persons between 16 and 19 years of age ® may be employed. %pplicant (s) Ronald S. Yamamoto name /B/A Little Ski-Mo Drive In (name of establis ment address Spur Highway, Gutsy Subd. - - lours of operation 11soclam to MOM PM--�—�Tel phone number 283-4463 menu must accompany t s application. 14en enu cIosea lave $o ce ever been called to -your premises by you or anyone else for any reason? 'es 0 No [] if yes, date(s) and explanation(s). linors duties taking and preparing food orders Ire video games available to the public on your premises? Yes )o you provide entertainment? Yes ❑ No EM If yes,describe. �. his permit remains in effect until expiration of the liquor license or at the discretion IIL f the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. Renewal must be made in conjunction with the iquor license renewal. (15 AAC 104.445 (b)). certify that i have read AS O4.16.049, AS O4.16.060, 15 AAC 104.435 and 15 AAC 104.445 and ave instructed my employees about provisions contained therein. App cants signature 0 pp ��, t on approved: ov'ng Body Official ate: 4-912 (Rev 9/83) Subscribed and sworn to before me this ?/sr day of+� l9�•/ 1 ry Public n and for AlasYta My commission expires F-0-91 _ Director, ABC Board Date: Suggested hys Mayor Waqoner CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 85-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING THE ALASKA LEGISLATURE TO FUND MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE AND REVENUE SHARING AS REQUESTED BY THE GOVERNOR IN HIS BUDGET. WHEREAS, the Alaska Legc�islature has before it the Governor's budget which includes $82 million in municipal assistance and $60 million in revenue sharing for distribution to local governments throughout the state of Alaska, and WHEREAS, on the adoption of and appropriation of monies to fund municipal assistance and revenue sharing for local government, the legislature expressed a desire for local government to use as much of this as possible in lowering the property tax rates to local citizens, and WHEREAS, most local governments adhered to the Alaska Legislature's request by injecting substantial amounts of their municipal assistance and revenue sharing into their operating budgets and thereby lowering the tax levies at the local government level, and WHEREAS, a lack of funding for municipal assistance or revenue sharing will result in a shortfall and therefore an immediate increase in taxes to local property taxpayera, and WHEREAS, in order to be consistent with the legislature's intent and the follow-through by local government in reducing local property taxes it is necessary for the Alaska Legislature to support the Governor's proposed budget of $82 million for municipal assistance and $60 million for revenue sharing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, that Council go on record urging the Finance Committee in both the House of Representatives and the Alaska State Senate, support the Governor's proposal of $82 million for municipal assistance and $60 million for revenue sharing to be distributed to local government throughout the state of Alaska. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 3rd day of April, 1985. Tom Wagoner, Mayor ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk i � t 1 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING (� MARCH 20, 1905, 7s00 PM 5s00 PH - Work Session with Library Commission (� PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (0) are considered to be routine and non-controveroial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit - 10 minutes per person) C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 1020-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Deleting Preference on Sale of City -Owned Lends 2. Ordinance 1021-85 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Central Filing System - $5,500 3. Resolution 85-27 - Transfer of Fund: - 3aponski St. Water b Sewer, Spur Meter Connection - $9,200 a. Approval of Additional Engineering 4. Resolution 85-20 - Awarding Did on Well House Repair - Krexberger - $12,500 5. Resolution 85-29 - Negate Past Construction Award Resolutions, Library Addition; Awarding New Contract - Sunset Construction - $686,500 6. *Application for Liquor License - 7-11 #202 7. •Additional Liquor License - Merit Inn 0. MINUTES 1. •Regular Meeting, March 6, 1905 E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. *DOT - Moving FAA Antenna 2. 9C. Simpson, Kenai River Property Owners Aeon. - Urging State Funding for Recreation 3. *Rep. Marrou - Local Service Roads 6 fraila 4. Delete S. *Rep. Marrou - Road Projects, Diet. 5 F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Latchkey Program 2. Lease Application - E. Petty - CIIAP G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. •Ordinance 1022-85 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Purchase of Kenai Atlas - $5,000 4. •Ordinance 1023-85 - Increasing Rev/Appne - S. Highbush, Bumblebee, E. Aliak, Swires, Highbush Rd. - $232,000 5. •Ordinance 1024-85 - Finding Airport Lando Not Needed for Public Use 6. *Ordinance 1025-05 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Donations - Kenai Museum - $1,294 7. •Ordinance 1026-85 - Amending Zoning Map - Sprucewood Glen S/D 8. •Ordinance 1027-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Title 21, Land Leases 9. Ordinance 1028-85 - Increasing Rev/Appne - Sidewalks, Lawton, Tinker, etc. - $79,000 a. Discussion - Sidewalks 10. Discussion - Fire Control Agreement with State 11. Discussion - EPA Grant Priority List 12. Discussion - Street Lighte Along Bus Routes H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk S. Finance Director 6. Planning 6 Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit - 5 minutes per person) ADJOURNMENT i I i i Y � a f` I i KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING March 20. 1985 - 1:00 PM Kenai Citv Hall Tom Wagoner. Mavor M0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL Present: All Council Members Present A-1 AGENDA APPROVAL City Manager Brighton asked that Ordinance 1019-85. inadvertently left off the public hearing and should be added at C-8. the second is's substitute. Resolution 85-29. Item C-5. G-13 set water & sewer assessments for City of Kenai A-2 City Clerk asked to remove the minutes from the consent agenda. Public Works Director wishes to amend. MOTIONS Councilman Measles, seconded by Councilman Ackerly. moved to approve the consent agenda MOTIONS Councilman Wise moved to revise G-8 and C-6, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous consent B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 1020-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Municipal Code - Deleting Preference on Sale of Citv-Owned Lands MOTION: Councilman Ackerly moved approval of Ordinance 1020-85. seconded by Councilman Hall. There was no public comment Councilman Wise stated that he could not support the ordinance. but no problem with removing land like Section 36 that has been subdivided and is ready for sale but this goes to far. getting into unsubdivided G,. - L - - --- -- - ----- - - --- - _ -- - - ---- - L - - --- -- - ----- - - --- - _ -- - - ---- V .. Ls 1 - - • It .-. t - 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 2 lands and negates the concept application for anything. It does not appear to be well thought out. VOTE: yess Wagoner. Ackerly not Wise, Bailie, Hall, Measles. Monfor C-2 Ordinance 1021-85 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Central Filing System - $5,500 MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved adoption of 1021-85, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor There was no public comment Councilman Wise had no problem with the appropriation but has problem with the third "Whereas", "Council did not fail to do anything, we did exactly what was requested of us. if anything it was the administrative poopsh not to ask for adequate monies and I really take offense for being blamed. we only responded to the administrative request and I find that offensive." VOTES Motion passed unanimously. C-3 Resolution 85-27 - Transfer of Funds - Japonski St. Water & Sewer. Spur Water Connection - $9.200 MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved adoption of 85-27. seconded by Councilman Measles There was no public comment. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. C-4 Resolution 85-28 - Awarding Bid on Well House Repair - Krexberger - $12.500 Public Works Director pointed out that item C-3-a was skipped and a motion is needed C-3-a Approval of Additional Engineering Councilman Ackerly asked for clarification of what is requested: should it be $5.900 depending on the necessity fnr a Corp permit. Public Works Director Kornelis stated that the Corp permit is just a I 1 - - • It .-. t - 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 2 lands and negates the concept application for anything. It does not appear to be well thought out. VOTE: yess Wagoner. Ackerly not Wise, Bailie, Hall, Measles. Monfor C-2 Ordinance 1021-85 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Central Filing System - $5,500 MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved adoption of 1021-85, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor There was no public comment Councilman Wise had no problem with the appropriation but has problem with the third "Whereas", "Council did not fail to do anything, we did exactly what was requested of us. if anything it was the administrative poopsh not to ask for adequate monies and I really take offense for being blamed. we only responded to the administrative request and I find that offensive." VOTES Motion passed unanimously. C-3 Resolution 85-27 - Transfer of Funds - Japonski St. Water & Sewer. Spur Water Connection - $9.200 MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved adoption of 85-27. seconded by Councilman Measles There was no public comment. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. C-4 Resolution 85-28 - Awarding Bid on Well House Repair - Krexberger - $12.500 Public Works Director pointed out that item C-3-a was skipped and a motion is needed C-3-a Approval of Additional Engineering Councilman Ackerly asked for clarification of what is requested: should it be $5.900 depending on the necessity fnr a Corp permit. Public Works Director Kornelis stated that the Corp permit is just a I KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 3 review and if it gets more involved it will cost an additional $2500. therefore $9.200 is the total cost. Councilman Ackerly stated that it appears to mean that they can do the Letter of Intent without the $9,200. Finance Director Brown stated that this is dealing with the Spur water extension, the $3300 above it deals with Japonski Street. MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved approval of the engineering on Japonski Street to McLane & Assoc in the amount of $9.200, seconded by Councilman Hall VOTES Motion passed by unanimous consent Return to item C-4 C-4 Resolution 85-28 - Awarding Bid on Well House Repair - Kraxberger - $12.500 Public Works Director stated that there was one other bidder that needed to go on: Echo Lake Drilling Co. and the amount is $12.700. ,-� this will not change the rest of the resolution. MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved approval of 85-28, to include the third bidder. Echo Lake Drilling and their total bid in the amount of $12.700. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie There was no public comment Councilman Wise asked what was being done, the word 'overhaul' usually means pumps and equipment, but a drilling company. are we going to rebore the well? Public Works Director Kornelis explained that thev would be pulling the well head pump itself, there will be another contract for the actual work on the pumps by an electrical company. Councilman Wise stated that it had been 8 years since the last cleaning, is this normal. Public Works Director Kornelis explained that it is a little overdue. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-5 Resolution 85-29 - Negate Past Construction Award Resolutions. Library Additions Awarding New Cnntract - Sunset Construction - $696.500 MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved to adopt 85-29. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 4 Mayor Wagoner stated that his packet was short the information. MOTION AMENDMENTS Councilmen Measles amended the motion to read 85-29 Substitute. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie. There was no public comment. Councilwoman Bailie asked how soon this could go out for rebids Public Works Director Kornelis answered 1 - 1.5 weeks on the revised drawings. the same price as Gaston. Need 30 days for advertising putting it around the end of April. Councilman Ackerly stated for clarification; bid it deleting the elevator making it on the same level as the current library, without probability for a second story. Mayor Wagoner indicated it was the opposite. Councilman Hall felt there should be provision for underground wiring for a future elevator for a future second story. Public Works Director Korneliss "the plans & specs shall be written so that a future second story could be added". MOTION AMENDMENTS Councilman Hall moved to add "the plans & specs shall be written so that a future second story could be added". seconded by Councilwoman Bailie. - s. Councilwoman Monfor asked for a time frame for the start of construction. answer from Public Works Director Kornelis. we are shooting for the first meeting in May to be awarded by Council, it will then take 10 days for the contractor to get his performance and payment bond insurance. after 10 days we will have a pre -construction conference and issue the Notice to Proceed. then you will have 120 days of construction or 6 months or completed by Christmas. VOTE - AMENDMENTS 81 & 2s yess Wagoner. Bailie. Hall not Wise. Ackerly. Measles, Monfor MOTION AMEND14ENT: Councilwoman Monfor moved to amend to go back to the original one story addition that was first designed and approved by Council without a second story to be added later. seconded by Councilman Measles. Councilman Wise asked if Councilwoman Monfor would be willing to. under the wording in the second paragraph. "the addition is to be built on the same level of the existing building." Councilwoman Monfor agreed. Councilman Wise stated that all it would do is clarify and there is no reference to a second story or elevator. Mayor Wagoner stated that with permission of second we can treat that as a friendly j amendment. Councilman Measles stated he felt uncomfortable with E c i; I; e 7 j KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 5 "leaving it hanging". add. "the elevator and plans for a second floor is to be deleted from the plans and specifications and leave out the rest of the sentence". MOTION FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Councilman Measles moved to further amend the amendment by adding: "the elevator and plans for a second floor is to be deleted from the plans and specifications, seconded Wise. Councilman Ackerly stated. "if we go back to the original plans it changes the interior. that's why I thought it would be important to back to the original plans and try to make them compatible. Councilman Measles stated. "we are talking about rebidding the construction of a library addition. the same level. one floor. no elevator, no future second floor." Public Works Director Kornelis stated. "that will make it compatible with the library as it is# with a second story it would not be compatible." Emily DeForest stated that "the floor plan on the original building. the original one story building is much more conducive for space than the floor plan you were planning on the two story building. The spacing is different but it gives us 4 typing and listening stations. the activity room was a little larger and yet it does not cut down on stack space if you go clear back to the first plans that were submitted, as far as I am concerned. that is a better floor plan to work with." Mayor Wagoner's "only statement to that would be that if we go with this amendment then the Council has spent $42.000 in design costs that we didn't need to spend in the first place and the reason we spent those was because the Library Commission asked us to try for more square footage for either now or in the future so if we go this way. we're basically not following what the Library Commission asked for at that time." Councilman Measles stated. "I believe the Council suggested that to them first." VOTE AMENDMENT 0: yes: Wise. Ackerly, Bailie. Measles. Monfor no: Wagoner. Hall VOTE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED: vest Wise. Ackerly, Measles. Monfor no: Wagoner. Bailie. Hall C-6 Application for Liquor License - 1-11 #202 Councilman Wise asked if it was permitted within the copulation figures. Rarely do we have a package store permit available within the City without 16 different applicants. Mayor Wagoner stated that "my understanding is the reason it even shows up on the City agenda is 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Paae b somewhat Questionable because we have nothing to say about it anyway. ours is merely an advisory thing." City Attorney Rogers stated that under the state statutes if we had some specific protest or reasons we could in fact protest the liquor license but the population criteria is not within the realm of our bailiwick to contest. MOTION: Councilman Measles moved that a letter of non -objection be sent in f regards to the package store liquor license, seconded by Councilman Wise. VOTES Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-8 Ordinance_1019-85 Increasing Rev/Appns - $19.400 - Rec Center MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved for adoption of 1019-85, seconded by Councilman Measles. There were no comment s from the public. Councilman Wise stated, "I still have the same basic problem, there are two whereases in there that indicate mismanagement and it hasn't been adequately explained on either one to my satisfaction. The first one is the level of personnel costs exceeding the level that was authorized by the City Council and I still don't have an explanation I' that explains why the level of expenditure exceeded that authorized by the Council, why for example did it take 6 - 7 months for the problem to surface. The second problem is the third whereas. "whereas it appears that at the present rate of expenditure, an additional $7.000 is needed for the operating supply account for the end of the fiscal year," that again is a deficiency appropriation and if we sift in the ` budget and approve monies as presented to us by administration and we buy their request, then they go ahead and expend we may as well go home, there's no sense in having a budget, every place I've ever been the deficiency appropriation is .justified by some unusual circumstance, natural disaster, alot of snowfall. something like that not by failure to execute the budget and I simply cannot buy it without some real explanation about -why the budget was not adhered to by the administration. by the department. the finance department. and the city manager. 3 agencies which are responsible in the code to monitor these activities." Mayor Wagoner felt that it was monitored and the Council is left with 2 choices. to stay within budget right now we can close down the i Recreation Center for the rest of year and not operate it. which I number 1 keeps intact the budget amount the City Council approved or j we can approve this ordinance. its one or the other. W M n /—� KENAI CITY COUNCIL J March 20. 1985 Page 7 Parks & Rec Director McGillivray explained that it is a combination of thingsi one we have slot more activity this year both upstairs and down and we have put people in the qym in the evenings when we've had heavy traffic there because we felt it visa necessary, we also failed to put in our budget last year for salaries for people who were replacing those who were taking leave or vacations. The request for $7,000 for supplies: Last year we requested $22,000 but was cut to $15.000 so it appears that the $7,000 is necessary to finish out the fiscal year. Councilman Wise asked Parks & Rec Director McGillivray if the Council had cut the $7.000. answer no. I VOTES Motion passed unanimously. BREAK D. MINUTES I. Regular Meeting, March 6, 1905 Public Works Director Kornelis wished to correct item on page 11, it should read. "They are charging ($100,000) $100.00 per'set for the Maps but copies are available to Council for their use at no cost. Minutes were approved as corrected. E. CORRESPONDENCE No comments F. OLD BUSINESS F-1 Latchkey Program Maryli Degerstrom stated that the program to looking for some committment of support from the City of Kenai and hoping to come up with some financial support for school age children. Ms. Degerstrom reviewed material previously submitted. Financing in Anchorage and Juneau is coming from a block grant and is 1/3 of the total funds necessary to run the program. the rest comes from parent fees and child assistance. Mayor Wagoner read Mr. Syzmanski's letter which stated that block grants are given to municipalities who then passes them through to the programs receiving the grants. It would appear that the more appropriate place to apply for those block grants would be the Borough. Department of Education rather than the city. Councilman Ackeriv stated that "the last time you were here you stated that you were going to Contact other olaces". Ms. Degerstrom stated that the Soldotna Council is being contacted thin eve-nino. also the Borough Assembly on Thursday night. City Manager Brighton stated that KENAI CITY COUNCIL i March 20. 1985 Page 8 the City already has day care assistance run through the Women's Resource Center. Ms. Degerstrom explained that day care assistance is for those who can't pay a full fee, and is run through Social Services. City Manager Brighton asked if they would then be eligible to participate in a day care program, answer yes. City Manager Brighton asked "if your program caters to those who can afford it, why are you asking for assistance". answer, the money is to get the program kicked off, to get set up. and people registered, and determine how much money can be brought in. City Manager Brighton stated that "it looks to me that these are two separate programs Performing basically the same functions one is state sponsored and the other one is not. Mayor Wagoner stated his feeling was that the City of Kenai should not get into a quasi social services program regardless of the purpose. It still should be run through the Borough. one reason for this being the participants are going to be area wide. not just the city. The City of Kenai receives tax support for city services for those within the city limits, although the recreation and library programs are broader. Ms. Degerstrom asked, ! "what you are saying is that at some point if the need were large enough and the participants could be identified as city residents you would support it, Mayor Wagoner answered that "I would .support the city having enough lead time to go to the Community & Regional Affairs to get a block grant but I would not support the City putting their dollars into it because the City is not in the day care or educational business, that is not one of the things we have elected to do and I'm not sure I would elect to do it in the future. Councilman Wise stated that Kenai is the first to get into day care assistance but only for those identified as residents through the Women's Resource Centers because we are a pass through agency. we are liable to the state for the funds. Councilwoman Bailie stated that it would be easier on the program to deal directly and exclusively through the Borough* and since it certainly a Borough -wide problem it would certainly be much easier to deal with one entity instead of going to each community and it does sound like the Borough could easily be the entity to work through. Councilwoman Monfor gave No. Degerstrom information to contact the Community Schools program. Councilman Wise asked how much money was allocated for children under 12. Parks & Rec Director McGillivray stated that the summer recreation program covered children from 5 to 15 years old. approximately $3000-3500 plus the parks and ball parks which are dedicated to younger children. Councilman Wise suggested cancelling the summer recreation program and funding this program. asking for a review of that statement. Mayor Wagoner stated that if we do that. then we need to go to Emily and ask if she wants to give up story hour. the volunteers who run that program. and every other program the city runs. Councilman Measles agreed that the City shouldn't get involved in this type of program. 1 " o f� 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 9 Ms. Deqerstrom stated that whatever the derision. they would like to get a letter of support if you in fact think the program is a good one, it will help our legislators for next fall. Mayor Waqoner agreed. F-2 Lease Application - E. Petty - CIIAP Land Manager Labahn explained that the Planning Commission reviewed this application 2 meetings ago. approved the concept application pending a list of things being revised, the applicant returned and the Commission again reviewed the site plan. There are still 2 concerns& 1 being drainage. City Engineer recommends a drainage plan be required prior to the phasing of the development. 2) snow removal was indicated, however the city feels that is unacceptable as arrangments need to be made for on -site storage or for removal of the snow. Eric Petty felt one of the main concerns of the Planning Commission was the possibility of Fred Never needing the site. Mr. Petty proceeded to demonstrate the current sites for Fred Meyer and the square footage required compared to the available tracts. Mayor Wagoner. the Council. and Mr. Petty discussed compatibility. Mayor Wagoner stated that the City is more than willing to work out a site for his theater but at this time they are interested in having an option to lease the property in its entirety to Fred Meyer. It has been related to Mayor Wagoner that the 2 poorer; uses of property. with ready access to highway frontage are bawling alleys and cinemas because they are not "prime time" activities and have a high demand for parking space. Mr. Petty disagreed stating that high exposure is important in that people coming or going from work drive by to see what is on the marquee for that afternoon. Councilwoman Monfor asked for a time frame for construction. i.e.. if it were postponed for a week or two would it put Mr. Petty too far behind. Mr. Petty answered that time is of the essence. Councilwoman Monfor asked if Mr. Petty had looked at any other lands. Mr. Petty answered yes. however, the lands along the highway that he was interested in were unavailable. MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved to postpone this concept lease application to the meeting of April 3rd, seconded by Councilman Measles. Mr. Petty asked if Fred Meyer had made any formal procedures for obtaining the property. Mayor Wagoner answered that thev have sent 2 letters indicating a strong desire for that property. they have reviewed the site. t4avor Wagoner expressed support of Mr. Petty's project and asked for indulgence until things are settled. Councilman Ackerly agreed. stating that he would not like to jeopardize the opportunity. Councilman Wise stated that he felt "there is not enouoh liability insurance to cover a loss if in invoking Fred Meyers' name in this lease application. the code is clear 1n that we do not have a i e , J i KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 10 competing lease application. a fee has not been paid. I feel we are very definitely exposed to a liability, on the record to discuss the viability of this lease relative to Fred Meyer. I think we have exposed ourselves to an extreme degree. I agreed that whether this particular site for a movie house is questionable, but when a third party enters into it, the discussion is tainted. I can't see justification for postponement." Mayor Wagoner asked for a legal opinion. City Attorney Rogers "disagrees with the legal opinion rendered by Councilman Wise. refer the Council to KMC 21.10.060 regarding the processing procedures for an application. I don't see any liability in what the Council has done and if I did see liability. I'd ask for an executive session and discuss it there, since this would involve financing, rather than discuss it publicly". VOTE TO POSTPONES yes: Wagoner, Ackerly, Bailie, Hall, Measles. Monfor nos Wise G. NEW BUSINESS G-1 Bills to be Paid. Bills to be Ratified MOTIONS, Councilman Measles moved approval. seconded by Councilman Ackerly VOTE TO APPROVEs Motion passed by unanimous consent G-2 Ra uisitions Exceedino $1,000 MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved approval. seconded by Councilwoman Monfor VOTES Motion passed with unanimous consent G-8 Ordinance 1027-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Title 21 - Land Leases MOTIONS Councilman Measles moved for introduction of Ord. 1027-85. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie. Councilman Wise stated, "I have a problem in that I don't know what this means and I don't think the public at large knows what it means. It's not that I disagree but I would like an explanation. I don't believe anything should be introduced unless there is backup material for the great American public not only in the audience but at home so that it can be widely disseminated before it is introduced. I don't • J L k KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 11 believe it should wait until a public hearing for them finally to get filtered down as to what the impact is. I think the ordinance should he postponed until backup material accompanies it." MOTION: Councilman Wise moved to table Motion fails for lack of second. City Attorney Rogers stated that his explanation would consist of copying a public document being the code provisions thought to be repealed by the ordinance and the reasoning for the wanting to repeal those are contained. It so happens that many of these code provisions are non existent or exist in a different form or format. What's happened is that standard lease provisions have become part of the code. not only that but are maintained by the code that those lease provisions are required. It is my hope that I can get away from the compulsory inclusion of such things in leases as arbitration and with this I would be allowed to do that. Right now we are being compelled to put an arbitration provision in every lease, that is to the city's disadvantage. Its very time consuming, it requires the appointment of 3 lawyers any time there has been an appeal. The other provisions are either intuitive or are already contained in the lease. If the Council wants to adopt a standard lease* which can then be amended for change by Council which I do not advise, they could do so. Disseminating material I think is a waste of time for me to copy provisions of the code to hand out as attachments to this and I also maintained that it is a public document. the code is available not only to Council but to members of the public as well should they express and interest." VOTES Motion passes yeas Wagoner. Ackerly, Bailie. Hall. Measles. Monfor no: Wise G-9 Ordinance 1028-85 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Sidewalks. Lawton. Tinker. etc. - $79.000 a. Discussion - Sidewalks MOTION: Councilman Ackerly moved for introduction of Ord 1029-85. seconded by Councilman Measles Councilman Wise stated. "my stand on sidewalks has been long-standing. normally during the winter time they are unavailable for the travelling public because of snow and other conditions, they don't. make any effort to clean them. I think that in alot of cases we have other needs in the Citv that are far more pressing then sidewalks. To KENAI CITY COUNCIL # March 20. 1985 Page 12 I carry this out to the logical development, we should put sidewalks in Redoubt Terrace, Woodland, Inlet View and some which are well - established areas that don't have sidewalks at all. I would rather .. see this money used for street lights for bus routes and road upgrading projects." Councilman Hall agreed. City Manager Brighton stated that he would like Council to take a long look at this piece of legislation. First, " Woodland, Redoubt. Linwood, Candlelight, Evergreen -Haller area just upgraded, all have no sidewalks. The only area that has sidewalks on both sides of the street is that stretch of the Spur between Main Street to Forest Drive. It would appear to me that rather then - putting sidewalks on both sides of Lawton as an example, that the money would be better spent upgrading a road or adding a water or sewer line. Councilman Ackerly discussed the request to Public Works that a letter be sent to the Fandels informing them of the action because they were - the initiators of the ordinance. Public Works Director Kornelis stated that the City Engineer had talked with them but no letter had been sent. VOTE -. Motion failed unanimously j Mayor Wagoner stated that he "doubted the sincerity of a proposal for f $10,840 to do the engineering, Councilman Ackerly agreed. G-10 Discussion - Fire Control Aoreemant with State i t� Fire Chief Winston stated that "the City Attorney wanted to get it on the table so that everyone would have a chance to look at it before ' reviewing should the City have any concerns with it. We don't have any problem with it the way it is, the only thing this does that the old agreement with them didn't cover are a few miles on K-Beach road on the side not in city limits that this agreement would require us to make the initial attack on as long as it was adjacent to the road. We drive right by it to get to Cannery Road so it really is to our benefit I think to jump on a small fire before it gets to be a big fire. It is just a basic mutual aid agreement with the Forest ` Service, they help us out when we have a wild lend fire and we help them out when they have one if its within our reach." City Manager Brighton stated his hope that the Council would make no decision on the item tonight. "I don't know how it relates to areas that proposed to be annexed to the City and I don't know how it relates to us providing free fire service to people outside the city ` f which the taxpayers are paying for." __. - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - i-- - - --- -- - ---- ------ -- C) KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 13 G-11 Discussion - EPA Grant Priority List Public Works Director Kornelis reviewed the list for the Council. EPA has lowered their funding by 55% and require the municipality to match it at 450. DEC will not provide that matching fund unless it is part of their priority list. Councilman Ackerly asked what would happen if we applied for this and could not obtain the necessary 450. would we be able to go with the grant from the Feds. answer yes. What would happens to the balance of that money. answer from Public Works Director Kornelis. any extra money would go back. Mayor Wagoner requested that a prioritized list be drafted by public works for the Council coordinating federal with state. Councilman Wise stated. "I am curious about the east Kenai interceptor. the Governor had it on his DEC matching program. I don't know where that bill has gone and its also on the Capitol Improvements List. I think it was in two different offers. I think we should pursue it. I think we should do the engineering we allocated the funds for and be in a strong posture to get it. leaving Beaver Loop I think is so for down the list, it would be good to have .just the things on the list that qualify so that if anything does happen we can withdraw in time. I think the east Kenai interceptor is a critical thing and I'd like to encourage the administration and Council to move on it and get it engineered. you already had bids. .just didn't award proposals. Councilman Ackerly asked about the incinerator which appears on the Borough list, no information available. G-12 Discussion - Street Lights Along Bus Routes MOTIONS Councilman Wise moved to proceed with the street light proposal. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie. The Council discussed the costs. Mayor Wagoner asked Finance Director Brown if the City pays for the light poles along the Spur. answer yes. Vie pay $60.000 per year but the state reimburses us. MOTION WITHDRAWN with consent of second Councilman Wise stated that "I can't see why HEA can't establish a rate for a non -metered street light and if they refuse to I think we should approach PUC to find out whv."Mayor Wagoner was of the under- standing that HEA is doing away with the vard lights on a monthly charge. it would be metered." Public Works Director Kornelis indicated he had contacted Air-Tek and HEA but only City Electric had responded. Kornelis will contact the other two. "Councilman Wise stated that. "I have no problem with the hookup charges. brit once its wired in I don't see why it has to run through a meter and I don't see KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 14 why there can't be a flat fee and if that's not ... HEA is a public utility, if they're not going to provide that public utility service then I think the customer and the share holders have a right to complain. I think we should approach them, the board. and PUC if necessary to get a clarification." Mayor Wagoner asked if Councilmen Wise was making a request of Public Works, answer yes. Mayor Wagoner set this item for next meeting. G-13 Discussion - Percent for Water & Sewer Assess. District This item is added as a result of the work session before the meeting. The Council. feeling a need for a policy when approached by the public requesting a water & sewer assessment district. MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved that water & sewer assessment percentages be set at 50%. seconded by Councilwoman Monfor. Councilmen Hall asked if this was to be established for new subdivisions or pertaining only to existing streets. MOTION AMENDMENT: Councilman Hall amended the motion to indicate the percentages would not pertain to new subdivisions, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor. Councilman Wise felt 5064' is too high. I think it is prohibitive and penalizing those who weren't able to get their requests in. MOTION: Councilman Wise moved to amend the percentage to 25% MOTION FAILS for lack of second Councilwoman Bailie stated that at one time when we were getting money from the state we were very plush and residents of the city were getting 1000 of the assessment district. Then at a time when we had money we were doing it without assessment and I feel that 5004 is fair and equitable at this time. Councilman Hall asked if after approving this will the priority list be changed, Finance Director Brown answered that it should be flexible enough to be a guidance situation. I think you are thinking in terms of development including multiple property owners. You will still have a situation like McLanes when you won't want to put anything into it. To clarify, Mayor Wagoner stated Councilman Hall's amendment takes care of this, as it only pertains to currently existing roads. not any future subdivisions. Councilman Wise stated that he had a problem of introducing this as an action item without holding a public hearinq. I N KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20, 1985 Paqe 15 MOTION: Councilman Wise moved to postpone this item to the next meeting and further request a formal resolution be drafted for public hearing. seconded by Councilwoman Bailie. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous consent H REPORTS H-1 City Manager Planning h Zoning has reviewed an ordinance proposed by the Borough regarding uniform street naming within the Borough. City Manager Brighton was informed that the Planning Commission recommended approval with 2 exceptions. 1)"new or changed street names shall not duplicate existing street names within the Borough" which means if Kenai has a Main Street. Homer can't have a Main Street. City Manager Brighton stated that the planning department at the Borough ought notto be telling the City of Kenai what to name their streets. 1) "the Planning Commission (Borough) may be resolution. change, rename. or name an existing or established street within the Borough at any time after the adoption of this ordinance upon notification" and does not say consent of municipalities, it says after consultation. Mayor Wagoner objected to the overall ordinance, "that's why the City of Kenai requested for and received their zoning powers was to enable us to do our own zoning and that includes naming our own streets and changing names. case in point. Chinulna Point, we were so worried about duplicating the name because there is one in the Borough. Land Manager Labahn explained that the concept of the ordinance is to coordinate street naming on a Borough -wide basis. Where emergency response is concerned within service areas. it causes the Borough some problems, this is where they are coming from. "If the Borough is going to take over the "authority" the City still needs to play an important roll in the street naming. What the Borough is requesting is that they would recognize all the existing streets the way they are now. but when additional streets come on line. that would go through the Borough for authorization." Mayor Wagoner stated that "what the Council is suggesting that you communicate with them that Council doesn't buy that. the Borough and the areas they are concerned about are not providing any emergency services within the City of Kenai. therefore there should be no conflict. their problem is within their own service districts and the unorganized portions of the Borrnigh." Councilman Wise stated that most of the people are able to identify if they are on Redoubt in Kenai rather than Redoubt in Soldotna. I don't see that as valid. Mayor Wagoner asked Land Manager Labahn to transmit those feelings to the Borough. L_... Is - - -- - -- - --. — -- - ._ - -- - -. . .1.. -•- --_.- -- _ KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Paoe 16 MOTIONS Councilman Ackeriv moved that the Citv Manager in consort with Land Manager write a letter to the Borough telling them thanks but no thanks we will keep our own powers, seconded by Councilman Hall. VOTES Motion passed by unanimous consent City Manager Brighton. in answer to question posed by Councilman Wise pertaining to "where are the money bills", as a result of 3 days in Juneau, the answer is they are in s state of hold. no CIP bills have been released from any finance committees. some have been in the State Affairs Committee in both Senate and the House and have gone from there to the finance committees, however, the finance committees are not going to turn looee any of those bills until they have reduced the Governors budget to a satisfactory level. Neither the Finance Chairman of the Senate or the House told Kenai no on any particular project that we have waiting. They will not start movement on VIP projects for another 2 or 3 weeks, but once they come out they will be coming fast and will take 14 people to follow them. Councilman Wise asked if they have killed the DEC matching program, answer no. H-2 City Attorney Councilman Ackerly asked for any new litigations. City Attorney Rogers answered. "we've got developers (inaudible) in litigation, we've got various utilities wanting to intervene in the PUC litigation* even though at first blush they won, they want it changed from the PUC decision so they are attempting to preclude our standing on the basis that we didn't intervene in the PUC matter." Councilman Ackerly asked about the cable TV matter. City Attorney Rogers answered that this decision is part of the decision. City Manager of Palmer indicated they may intervene on our side. City Attorney Rogers is sending copies to various other communities and should hear shortly. H-3 Mayor Mayor Wagoner submitted 2 names for confirmation for people to serve on the Mayor's Council on Aging. these 2 names will bring it to full membership. Mayor Wagoner has not been able to obtain volunteers from the Native Group. however hopes to have a volunteer at the next term opening. The names are Francis Meeks and Fred Chambers. MOTIONS Councilman Ackerly moved to accept the names submitted, seconded by Councilman Wise . 1 KENAI March CITY COUNCIL 20. 1985 - Pace 17 VOTEs Motion passed by unanimous consent. �► Sue Carter submitted a letter requesting Past Mayor Ron Malston serve in her is placOhs she coming into the busy time of year for the Chamber. Ron Malston asked for a postponement to consider. There are no other names for the Beautification Committee. Walter Them, resident of the City is willing to serve on that Committee. Mayor Wagoner will be in contact with him. Mayor Wagoner presented a letter from the Governor which is to be sent to each Council member regarding volunteers, asking each municipality to submit names of persons for Volunteer of the Year. Each name submitted will receive a certificate from the Governor. Mayor Wagoner suggested requesting the Chamber submit names also. Mayor Wagoner referred to Rep. Marrou's prioritized list and indicated a passage reading. "to the best of our knowledge" this is the first time this procedure has been used. Mayor Wagoner pointed out that the phrase "our" is a qualified my or I and the list is not a list of the contingency of the legislative representatives from the Peninsula. City Manager Brighton stated that the representatives were emphatic that they were no part of this list. Mayor Wagoner reminded the Council of a joint meeting with the Assembly Members for breakfast on March 28th. Clerk to send out notices to the Council and 5 Assembly members. Mayor Wagoner will be on vacation from 4/3 to 4/20. Councilwoman Monfor referred to the .joint work session with the Planning Commission and Beautification Committee regarding the Old Towne project. Council Members Monfor, Hall, Ackerly, and Wagoner will all be out of town. however it was determined that the session will go forward. H-4 Citv Clerk r No Report H-5 Finance Director No Report H-6 Planning-6 Zoning Councilman Wise was unable to attend n , N .N i KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 Page 18 H-7 Harbor Commission No Meeting Councilman Wise. "we were talking one time about trying to proceed with what we've got and doing something. where are well. Mayor Wagoner stated that to his knowledge we are no further. Councilman Wise asked if they have been informed that we are interested in (inaudible) answer yes. H-8 Recreation Commission No Report H-9 Library Commission No Report I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD Carmen Gintoli, 117 Deepwood Court, asked for clarification on the zoning code. "If a person wants a variance from a zoning ordinance �• and that variance is granted by the Planning Commission, does not the City Council have to approve the variance also. I understood the Planning Commission was advisory only." City Attorney Rogers stated that persons aggrieved by the action of the Commission can come to Council. The problem I have is the advisory nature of it and the lack of any approval and disapproval by Council unless it is an appeal situation. Mr. Gintoli stated that there was a variance granted at the last meeting and the work was done and the Council never heard anything about it and that is the 7-11 sign. Council members Ackerly and Monfor expressed concern regarding this esp. since it was such a close vote. Councilman Wise stated that prior to the Zoning Code the Commission was advisory to the Borough and then to the Council, however, within the Zoning Code they are delegated specific authorities. Public Works Director Kornelis introduced a proposal for flag poles for $8.000. Councilman Ackerly had asked for this information, and feels at this point that it is for information purposes. Mayor Wagoner requested a discussion on this item Public Works Director Kornelis brought up the E. Aliak project at ' request of the City Manager. The design engineers on that project are no longer in business and the City is having problems with the drawings. SAS Engineers are reorganizing in Anchorage. The person drafting the drawings are trying to make it good. 9 N. Ir KENAI CITY COUNCIL j March 20. 1965 Page 19 Councilman Wise expressed concern that Inlet Woods will not be going to bid this year. We bonded specifically for that project and money has been spent on the clearing. How much grace time are they going to be given, we can't finalize an assessment project until an audit has been conducted, then a year before the first payment. Are we going to permit anyone to drag out a project beyond a normal realm. Inlet Woods should be complete this year by virtue of the circumstances it was funded. Public Works Director Kornelie stated that he has spoken to Bruce Robeson of McLanes who felt he could have the drawings in by the end of this week. "I don't think they are intentionally trying to draw it out". Mayor Wagoner agreed with Councilman Wise and have "informed the public that that is going to be out for bid and under construction and portions of it should be finished this year. I have the same reservations as Councilman Wise if it isn't. It was funded with the understanding that it was going to be ready at this time for bid." Councilman Wise stated that we are paying money out of pocket for the interest with nothing being collected on 3 projects. Mayor Wagoner asked Public Works for a full report at the next Council meeting. Councilman Measles asked to go back to G-5. "I think we need to do something with that parking at the terminal. and I'm not sure that as far as long term parking out there that we shouldn't have some type of a charge or permitting process be it monthly, weekly, whatever. I think that would take care of some of the cars that are left in that long term lot. some appear to be left there for some pretty long periods of time." Councilman Measles referred to the drawing and asked about the permit for the rental cars. Airport Manager Ernst stated. "I inherited the sign and I don't know what that means". Right now there is no permitting. Regards the time limit, we are policing that. since the 30 day sign went up, cars are being hauled away that violate the time limit. Councilman Wise asked if there was room in the south lot to expand. Airport Manager Ernst answered yes. Councilman Wise stated that he would like to see the City move to use airport funds to fully expand that south lot with no objection to using the land across the airport also. Councilman Ackerly expressed his wish to keep the 2 lots for commercial use. Mayor Wagoner would like to see the City hire a private individual and turn the parking lot over to him to run. and finds it hard to understand why the City has to set aside 66 spaces for rental cars when "I doubt that there's never been a time in the history of the airport there has ever been more than 3 or 4 cars rented for any specific flight that arrives in Kenai. I think we should look at reducing the amount of rental car slots and let the rental agencies go elsewhere off the airport like they do in every other town and have their lots there and when a car is needed, they can bring them. They would still have 5 to 6 cars there. but 66 cars are excessive. The lease is coming up in July and -'1 if we are really in a crunch. rather than put up other land up we should look at this. I think we have almost as many rental cars as Anchorage and that airport has rental cars off the airport and bring J x .M a -- KENAI CITY COUNCIL March 20. 1985 le t Page 20 them as needed." Airport Manager Ernst stated that there is not an Immediate problem but that there is going to be a problem and the interim solution is to set aside lands available for parking, otherwise the alternative is exactly what you are suggesting. Not only have you eliminated a problem but you have eliminated the theft, vandalism. and all the other problems. We did not suggest the south lot because it is land already set aside for parking purposes. Mayor Wagoner mentioned the number of junker cars left at the airport. That property is too valuable to allow that type of use. Councilman Wise felt that a fee system is worthy. "We have to provide parking and your analogy of the junker care is good and I can't see why we have not moved ahead on this". ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at M 05 pm dfloldzJ Janet Loper Acting City Clerk 'fa 1 w NOTICE \8� PACIFIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS HAS BOUGHT CONTEL'S HOLDINGS IN ALASKA PACIFIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS HAS PROMISED NO LOSS OF JOBS. BUT, WHEN THEY CLOSE DOWN THE CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPT., THE ENGINEERING DEPT., AND TELEPHONE SERVICES DEPT. ON K-BEACH ROAD, ARE YOU PREPARED TO MOVE TO. -� KODIAK, JUNEAU, DOUGLAS, NORTH POLE OR ANCHORAGE TO MAINTAIN YOUR JOB? PACIFIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS WILL MOVE THESE :'. DEPARTMENTS TO ANCHORAGE AND THE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL BE MADE IN THE MIDDLE OF APRIL, 1985. Xv v ......... Z t i SLUM Ota�te legiora�ture ' 4 0 il�.� Senator Edna DOVries. Chairman •• �� � Momboro• senate Senator Ferguson. Vice Chairman 6 ?R -_ =.• : Senator CogMn Senalor SlUrgUleWskr • j - Senator V. Fischer (committee on - Pouch V Official Business Juneau, Alaska99811 �lCommunitr anb Regional giffairg i March 20, 198 0 r --- � Mayor Tom Wagoner 'Z`v ' City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mayor Wagoner: 4 I am pleased to report to you that I moved SB 142, the revision to Title t 29, out of my canmittee this past week. My •cam[aittee, Senate Community and Regional Affairs, held two committee hearings and one special work . session in order to take action on the bill at the earliest possible date. . .. We considered a mzber of amendments, all but two of which came to us after having been passed by the House Cammittee on Community and Regional Affairs. We adopted all but one of the House camtiittee amendments that were generally technical in nature. My cammittee also passed a letter of intent and a purpose clause and passed out SB 142 as a calmittee substitute. e SenatSenate CanmInity and Regional Affairs proposed no new amendments to this piece of legislation. This does not mean that the Committee _ is 100% pleased with every provision of SB 142. it does mean that we liate the need to pass this bill as soon as possible so that the pertaining to local government can be unified in one statute title - for the convenience and administrative efficiency of all government officials. I held a meeting this week with Senator pat Rodey, who chairs the -- catfLtttee that now has sB 142 (Senate Judiciary), and offered him my full assistance. 4. 1"L.N DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RKSOURCES rova1M JUNEAU, ALASM 081 f OFFICE OF 1HE COMMI STONER IHON81 March 11, 1985 MAR it; The Honorable Ben Grussendorf, $peak Alaska State House of Representatives '�:;;,y'' OFFIC OF THE Pouch V COMMISSIONER Juneau, Alaska 99811 Dear Speaker Grussendorf: Attached for your information is a recently completed update of Cook Inlet Oil and Gas data prepared by the Division of Oil and Gas. This information updates figures in the Historical and Projected Oil and Gas Consron report, which was submi e£�you—January, 19y. Total remaining Cook Inlet gas reserves were previously estimated to be 3.26 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) as of January 1, 1984. The revised estimate of Cook Inlet reserves is 4.46 Tcf as of January 1, 1985. Inclusion of additional gas reserves from the Grayling gas sands (Trading Say Unit) and incorporation of gas reserves from the Stump Lake Units, Cannery Loop Unit, and Pretty Creek Unit were primarily responsible for the increase in gas reserves. Assuming current use patterns are maintained, we estimate that cumulative use of natural gas from Cook Inlet fields will be 3.3 Tcf between 1985 and 1999. Thus, it appears that there are sufficient gas reserves to meet projected needs in the railbelt for more than 15 years. An estimate of state royalty oil available from Cook Inlet fields is also attached. If you have questions about this information please do not hesitate to contact me. �• Sincerely, Esther C. Wunnicke Commissioner Attachments as stated cc: Members of the House of Representatives 11 if n • ti COOK INLET GAS RESERVES • 1, (Billions of Cubic Feet) STATE FIELD REMAINING RECOVERABLE GAS ROYALTY SHARE as of Jan. 1. (as of an. , 985) Kenai 850 17 North Cook Inlet 650 8l Beluga River Soo 60 Swanson River 260 0 Cannery Loop 300 9 McArthur River & Trading Bay 650 81 Beaver Creek 230 0 Cook Inlet Associated Gas 60 7 Ivan River - Lewis River - Pretty Creek - Stump Lake 600 75 Other 63 8 Totals 4W- 339 • Department of Natural Resources Division of MI and Gas Updated March MS ti. • • P ` AVAILABILITY OF COOK INLET ROYALTY OIL Year (1) Barrels Per Day 1985 5935 1986 5032 1987 4290 1986 3643 1989 3097 1990 2645 2991 2226 1992 1903 1993 1613 1994 1387 1995 1181 i (1) As of January 1 of each year ` Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas March, 1985 j i p A r DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' and PUBLIC FACILITIES ; 4111 AVIATION AVENUE, POUCH 6M CENTRAL REGION PLANNING & PROGRAMMING, ANCHORAGE "502 (TELEX 25-185) March 14, 1985 Re: Project RF-021-1(16) &(19) 6gg9to»,_ Sterling Highway MP 79 - MP 94 Design Study TT Report The Honorable Tom Wagoner Mayor 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 �c== Dear Mayor Wagoner: Enclosed is a copy of the above referenced report on -the Sterling Highway upgrade. it is being distributed for your information at this time so that knowledge of the project can be included in planning decisions. As you are aware, there has been a dramatic decline in state revenues re- sulting in severe competition between many needed projects for scarce funding. As a result, it is unlikely that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities will be able to secure construction funding authorization for this project in this fiscal year. We will consider requesting construction funding ` authorization for this project in the FY87 budget. The present emphasis in i this area is on gaining the necessary funds to overlay the existing two lane road to provide short-term protection and prevent further deterioration of the road surface. = Please direct a 4y questions or comments on this project to Tony Barter, P.E., Design Project Manager. Your interest in transportation matters is appreciated. - -- Since y, L Schmidt Acting Manager -=- Area and Local Planning DBT/ar Enclosure WFn. J. Nelson Q cot, ' STRUCTUR n February 28, 1985 ^ Ff8i986 �f HCL' uDl city of t� Wow Dopy Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director'- j City of Kenai P.O. Box 880 Kenai, Alaska 99611 ,�t�� HUMS OF 'fZ-3-85r Rea HARBOR/DOCK FACILITY IN THE KENAI RIVER .bite wob "� pu0 _ f . 13SZORN -� Dear Mr. Kornel i sa QeraW O"' ON — With the publication of the "City of Kenai Small Boat Harbor Financial Analysis and Conceptual Design" by TAMS, it became apparent that the funding and construction of a dredged harbor is not economically feasible at this time. As an alternative it has been suggested that the City should construct a dock or seawall for fish off-loading and vessel fueling to serve commercial and sport fishing interests. It is my understanding that the City has approximately $1.6 million designated for port facility construction and $83,000 available for design of such a facility. I believe that the City has adequate funds to design and to construct a facility on it's currently owned land on the river. Although many larger schemes have been presented, I think that a reduced scope project including a fish dock, fueling facility and repair grid could be built with available funds. This project could be designed to meet the most immediate needs of the commer- cial fishing industry by speeding up the off-loading process, thereby increasing fish quality and ex -vessel prices. Secondly, presence of an off-loading facility would help to reduce pressure from conflicting use by sport and commercial fishermen. Currently a limited volume of fish is brought off the river via the boat launch. This situation limits access to sports fishermen wanting to launch boats while the commercial off-loading is taking place. As a time schedule, I suggest that the design could be initiated this spring with design completion this fall. The project could be bid this fail with construction beginning in the spring of 1986. Construction could continue through 1986 with completion prior to the 1987 fishing season. - -- - a- - - - -- --- - - - /r i Harbor/Dock Facility in the Kenai River Page 2 W The primary concept I wish to emphasize is that by reducing the scope of the project the City could construct a facility with funds currently available. This could be accomplished by directing an engineering firm to design a project to fit budgetary constraints as opposed to designing a project that meets all needs and then finding out that insufficient funds are available for construction. Although a design -build project is being considered at this time, I believe that separating the design from the construction would enable the City to have more quality control over the project. Should you, the administration, or council wish to discuss this concept further I would be glad to meet with you. Sincerely, WN. J. NELSON & ASSOCIATES 00 ,ice Wm. ,. Nelson, P.E. Principal r WJN/bag N �-r f � t,; r T.1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FOuCH z ��qq ggggO ONEl 7 4aFffOFFICE OF THE COMMONER + March 18, 1985 k ?The Honorable Tom Wagoner, MayorvCity of Kenai i/I I r, a L � 7 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mayor Wagoner: This is in response to your letter regarding maintenance of the Kenai Spur Highwaye The department's Central Region Division of Maintenance and operations has identified the need to resurface this route, and current plans are to chip -seal the roadway this summer as an interim measure. Funding of asphalt overlay for the Kenai Spur Road will be considered in the department's PY87 budget. J1 We have 'included a preliminary engineering proposal to upgrade the Kenai Spur to a four -lane roadway between Kenai and Soldotna in the FY96 budget. This project would identify the route, right-of-way requirements, preliminary costs, and develop plans for construction. Since federal funds will be sought to construct the project, it will take several years to complete the work. I suggest you contact George Janssen, Central Region's Deputy Commissioner, 266-1440, to discuss this project. 0 7DA•T t LM If you have further questions, please contact me again. so cc: Dolly Farnsworth, Mayor, ity of Soldotna R. Dean Redick, Director, Maintenance & Operations, DOT&PF Stan Thompson, Mayor, Kenai Peninsula Borough - -IL- �- - , CO PoucH Bit Dicarr. ON' COMMUNITT A REGIONAL AFFAIRS PHONE: (907)7►8KA 40" 0871 ® 949 E. WH AVENUE, SUITE 400 MUNICIPAL & REGIONAL ASSISTANCE DIVISION ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99W9 PHONE. (907) dBf4W March 22, O Ra BOX W BETHEL, ALASKA 991u' 9 2425Zg2j PHONE- (90>)P"70 I 'DL � 0 PA Box 41 NOME, ALASKA 0702 rm� PHONE: (907) I0407 Mr. Tim Rogers, City Attorney ti :" �` o P.a BOX City of Kenai `^' `� .:. KOTZEBU& ALASKA 99702 PHONE: ✓ 210 Fidaigo ��si�... (907) 4#2.970 -; : Kenai, Alaska 99611 r ,; �'' O /0I/ CUSHMAN STREET ROOM 20l !: FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 PHONE. (007) 452.7120 Dear Mr. Rogers: O va, Box ima DILLINGHAM. ALASKA 99070 RE s CITY OF KEDTA PHONE, (907) 802.224a I ANNEKATION PETITION This is in response to your letter of March 7 leveling certain criticisms at the Division for the manner in which several annexation petitions, initiated by local residents, were handled. It is unfortunate that these proceeding have resulted in confusion. J From my review of your letter, it appears that several events contributed to the situation. As you are aware, Mr. Jim Sanders left the Local Boundary Commission staff position prior to the City's submittal of the annexation petition. Mr. Gene Kane had only been in the position a few days when the petition was received by the Division. To compound this transfer of responsibilities, the City's Petition arrived at the time when the Division and the Local Boundary Commisuion were involved in several municipal Incorporations and preparing for the annual round of legislative review annexation petitions and public hearings. Consequently, the Division was unable to expediently review the City of Kenai's petition or identify potential problems with the petition. Additionally, and most importantly, during this interim the composition of the Local Boundary Commission was changed by the Governor. The new Local Boundary Commission members directed staff to review all petitions coming before the Commission with a far more stringent application of the appropriate standards. When Mr. Kane was able to review the City's petition, it became apparent that the petition had several errors which precluded the Department from accepting the petition without some amendments. e f Mr. Tim Rogers REs CITY OF KENAI ANNEXATION PETITION March 22, 1985 Page 2 I agree with your contention that the administrative regulations are confusing and difficult to follow. To remedy this situation, we have recently entered into a contractual relationship with the Department of Law to review and revise the regulations to make them consistent and usable by the average citizen. We hope to have this task completed by the end of this year. I hope the City Council and those individuals initiating the original petition accept my apology and explanation for this situation. Please understand that if the original petitioners are still interested in pursuing this annexation, the Division will provide assistance to identify the means to avoid the errors contained in the original petition. Sincerely, "rither o Director ccs -P a Honorable Tom Wagoner, Mayor, City of Kenai William J. Brighton, Kenai City Manager The Honorable Stan Thompson, Mayor, Kenai Peninsula Borough Thomas R. Boedeker, Kenai Peninsula Borough Attorney Emil Notti, Commissioner Jeff Smith, Deputy Commissioner Department of Community & Regional Affairs Gene Kane, Staff Assistant to the Local Boundary Commission Jim Sanders, Anchorage Field Office Supervisor Municipal and Regional Assistance Division, Anchorage n i • CITY OF KENAI Al 210 RoALGO KEW, ALASKA IMI 6 TEWHONB 2A8.7M 4 h, R, MEMO 70: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director a 9a DATE: March 27, 1985 Subject: Street Lights At the March 20, 1985 Council Meeting, the Council asked for some further information on street light utility costs. The City is charged for approximately 144 " and lights" (which are more accurately described as small street lights at a total monthly cost of about $1,700. These lights are charged out on a fiat rate of about $12.00 per month. In addition, the City is charged for approximately 80 street lights on meters. The cost for these averages about $2,800 per month, or about $35.00 each. These costs may vary significantly from month -to -month. As I said last Council Meeting, I believe that street light utility costs next year will be $60,000. You can expect each new light to cost between $35.00 to $40.00 per month for electricity. if we use the $40.00 cost (which many lights cost), we get $480.00 per year. This is very close to the KWH cost identified in Keith Kornelis' letter in the last packet ($499.00 per year). However, Keith's memo also identified a cost of $348.00 per year as a meter charge. This is a charge per meter, not per light. There may be virtually any number of lights on a meter. I called AEA, and was informed that they are taking an inventory of yard and street tights for the City. They also said an adjustment would be made for lights not operable, as discussed at last Council Meeting. • i � I I SIX YEAR 0110TORY i1 INCR. sM UTILITY EXPENSES ORIGINAL RE(IUF9TEO 1980-81 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET SUDBET TO 1980-91 1991-82 1902-83 t983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1985 416 BEN. FUND NON-DEPT. 2,600 13,390 t4,096 19,510 21,000 24,000 023.00% FT. KENAY 0 0 1,637 3,099 3,640 3,400 N/A POLICE IINCL. JAIL) 10,952 11,303 11,757 13,654 11,010 12,00 13.6811. FIRE 9,348 9,933 10,784 12,631 t5,350 17,100 62.93% •• SHOP 6,196 13,660 16,068 17,304 20,000 20,000 222.791/ ! 0 0 1,389 1,703 2,000 2,000 N/A T LIt3HT� IN i ---022,931 31,028 39,5565 48,649 46,000 60,000 16165% + LIBRARY 4,329 5,332 5,571 6,277 6,500 15,626 260:96% RECREATION 724 8,929 12,098 21,702 22,000 22,000 2,938.67% PARKS 262 280 sm 1,315 1,000 1,800 587.02% TOTAL.GEN,._F.UND ....,•.. 57,342 94,751 113,554 145,850 149,900 178,376 211.07% +..+ WATER 26,282 32,073 43,358 50,921 48,000 50,000 90.24% I, SEWER 1,523 3,202 5,071 4,929 6,000 69000 293.96% SEWER TREATMENT 14,564 46,368 79,075 71,871 70,000 70,000 300.64% '�---TOTAL 1418 42,369 81,643 127,504 127,721 124,000 126,000 197.39% AIRPORT 1TERMINAL & M&O) 35,661 31,759 41,873 52,899 65,000 62,000 73.1w/ BRAND TOTAL 135,372 209,153 202,931 326,470 338,300 366,376 170.64% 4., NOT6s EXCLUDER SENIOR CITIZENS ,N r w i E CITY OF KENAI "Od Capdal aG 4&4a" 210110M= N NA AWU WWI Tm"NONH 2e3 • T&M March 15, 1985 TO: William J. Brighton FROM: Keith Kornelis SUBJECT: Street Lights along.bus routes. FOR: Council Meeting of March 20, 1985 Attached is City Electric's letter dated March 7, 1985 which outlines the costs for installing street lights along the bus routes within the City of Kenai. The second and third pages list the location of the 40 street lights and the costs for installation (capital), repair and maintenance, and annual operating costs. Some things to notes (1) City Electric recommends using 250 watt high pressure sodium street lights and I have based the below rough cost estimate on that. (2) City Electric's cost did not include HEA connect costs (I estimated $118/pole) nor actual staking. (3) City Electrics cost are for using wood poles not steel in concrete bases. (4) All cost are only rough estimates - because the cost is over $6,500 we will have to go out to bid on the project. 9 Rough cost estimate for 40 poles: CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE $1,282 / Pole - install 116 / Pole - HEA $194UU'- Pole' $1,400 / Pole x 40 Poles = $56,000. ANNUAL COST ESTIMATE $ 15 /Pole- R&M $499 / Pole - KWH $348 / Pole - Meter CHG O e $862 / Pole x Poles = 534.480/Yr. The street lights in Woodland, Redoubt Terrace, and Inlet View are no longer being manufactured. HEA can not get replacements and have suggested we replace the light fixtures. City Electric has given us a cost estimate of $490 for each unit. HEA has estimated that there are 56 lights in these areas. So at $490/ea we would have a cost of $27 440.00. I might point out that presently as these lIgnts are urns out we can not fix them. i n (;1 f .J • 1 n -- fl pop 1 T Y J i_ E C 1 R 1 C. INC. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 3700 RAINIiR AVENUE 60. SEATTLE, WASHINOTON 08144 2001 722.0700 POST OFFICE 90X 3000 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 00001 907) 272.4531 POST OFFICE 80% 40303 ('4IRISANK9 ALASKA 09706 f9071 402.7198 ROUTE 1 f;011 119 KENAI ALASKA 00001 f0071203.7000 3-7-85 REPLY TO F.enat Office fice City of Kenai RCFERENCE 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai, Alaska SM9 AT1N: Keith Kornelis j HE: Additional Street Lighting. Gentlemen; I aplolgim for the delay in returning this proposal, but have worked the following for your consideration. 1- I would recommend only 250 watt flikh or sure Sodium for street 1 ti Simp y , a zW Vat WS has approx. ns Of output for watts power consumed, the 400 watt Lferc. has 22,500 Lumens of output for 400 watts of power consumed. 2- labor costs to install would be the same for both units, but the mere. fixture and lamp costs more. Tamp replacement are W.00 for 400 watt Hm. arts $27.00 for the M33. Both are rated 24,000 hours lamp life, and our cal- culation of costs are based on an average of 150 HRAID 0 4.5 cents/KM, plus a monthly fee of W.00. These should last for ten years. The repair and maint. cost of M5.00 per unit is for vandalism. The 250 watt HPS fixtures are quoted with Lem lens, which should elimenate glass breakage. Our quote Is valid for 90 days and is a firm quote, based on the attached drawings. ` RAW not quote steel uoles and concrete bases due to higher costs. i CwwM ..... .� .sv —__— _ Y._ ___.__a_a mr Moto I, If you decided- a this project, *we Could Check out the poss- F 1 ibilitq of plowing cable between poles, thus eliminating the M.00/np for each meter. The best area would involve poles 29 thru 39. We have excluded actual staking of the individual i poles from our quote. J i have also submitted a proposal for the replacement of the existing post lights !V in t7oodland and Redoubt subdivisions, with new GE C72LMOI 150 watt BPS, using existing UG wire at the present voltage. - -- �(� These would cost 5490.00 for each obit, including labor, fixture and lamp. �# t Yours q; lovskq 'tanager City Electric Inc Kenai Division 1. FA/aa '� 1, ELECTRIC IC ,p rl . d L �A Capital f Capital f R 6 M R 3 M f/Yr Oper f/Yr Oper SIREEI LIGHT Mercury Sodium Mercury $/Yr Sodium $/Yr Mercury Sodium I. Walker Lane 8 Airport Rd (1) : 808.00(1001) 499.()0 (KWH)B.00 ' 1 3:i0.00 PA. 1 2R2 00 owriR dui) 348.00 WAR d G) Z. Walker ane 6 Airport Rd 21 n o of It of to of of of it to of un of of n B it r J. Fourth 6 LVOrgreen n it a of n u to o of of to of of of of to rr of 4. Second Evergreen ourth 6 Forest n to of to it to to It of it to It it it or to n is 6. Fourth b McKinley of of of of it of m rr to to of of of it of to to of 7. Gill A rothom of of of it it B of of It to, It of of It rr of n rr 8. Stellar A Forest is n u to to a n n n u u n n n n rr It of 9. oyan a Forest o of n n ,o of of of of of of of of of rr of of IS U. Forest 8 Elm r to n of to of n to it of of n It u it it It to rr • Robin Drive ¢ Spur of of to Is it of n It Of of to of .t u It rr of It • Cook inlet -View A Lilac It to of It of of of to .f u to .. .o it n .. .. ,. I]. California•& Second it to of rr of of it to to it to r. of it to of It it 1. Redoubt Avenue (1) o n n a n o n n n a u u u• o rr a rr rr Redoubt Avenue 1 11adoubt Avenue to .t of is of of of of of it of to to to to of it of 17. Redoubt Avenue 4 of to of of of of o n o 0 of of n to to to a of W. Spruce St - Ballpark 1 o it it e o 0 o n rr u n I • Spruce St — Ballpark (2) v n a n u n n n n n u u too n ofo u fourth Spruce RnO.an (K+YH) 499.OD (OR)20. PA. 1,282.00 EA. EBT. 10 EA EBr. 18.1w) PA. nn goo d 4 6 1 I fe 1 1 I . 1 1 Capital f Capital f R 6 M R& M $/Yr Opor f/Yr Oper SIREE1 LIGIIT Mercury Sodium mercury $/Yr Sodium We mercury Sodium 21. Kaknu 6 Candlelight 1 388.0D EA r 1,282.00 r FA. I� r. 18.00 FA Eff. lfdx! NA. ��� (K171i) 8.00 ! A 4S,00 (SO) 348 00 6 22. lhlyd 6 Evergreen of of IF of of of of of u n rr rr „ w m n n n 23. rinwoN S Rognu rr 24. ana a Canalollillot Of a of of of It to n of it o „ n of it rr of of 25. nw On 6 14LI) of it to it „ to . of of of of if of of n rr a it if 26. eavee Loop 6 Julitionen to to to to n r 27. Deaver Loop & Doc ok it w of to w to' 28. Bridge Access h Sprueewood of to to of it to of to to of of Of it if of to to of eve 6 Baleen Avenue „ n to of It of of of to n to of to to o „ r 30. VIP Drive & Set Net Drive „ It to to n to Of to of Of it of it of of it of of h 31. VIP Drive A Sanddollar „ o w w s u w rr rr w n u s w e rr w r 32. VIP DrvaAmur „ to of to to of of n of to of of of it it it it it 33. VIP Drive A Lora Drive n of it of of to It of rr of of it Of to to of of if 34. Sunr ne Jo Lora Drive it it of to of it Of nn of of of of to it to of of to { k 35. .Sunr 100 & Muir Drive of to u to of rr to of n OF n „ to rm to of n of 5Ep 36. Sunriea 6 Set Not Drive „ rr n r 37. Sunr I se A Pirate Lane it of It of to of of of to it to to of to e rr of u 38. SunrAGO A ROtCfi of n of of It it to to of to of to of it it of of of � l. Pirate 6 K-Baaeh of to to to It of to of of to to of it of ofrwr of so"n' ' 40. Bridge Accass 6 Child's SLreat EM.00 (OH) 40A.00 (IiiPH) (Acroaa (rum Port of Kanay 1,366.00 EA. 1r282,00 FA. Wr.. 15.00 PA. 65T. 16.00 PA. 348.00 00M AK; 348.00 (/12rP.11 4 110) _L ! C. 1 �� �. f;L[CTRICAL CONTRACTORS � t ! 3700 RAINIER AVENUE 60, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 08146 12081 722.0700 POST OFFICE BOX 3600 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 19071 272.4531 POST OFP#Ce 13OX 00303 PAIRFANKS. ALASKA 00700 #0071 462.7166 ROUTE 1. BOX 116 KENA1. ALASKA 99011 49071 263.7000 RePLr TO: Yr@ ai Office _ aeiaaeNcE City Of rimi Quote 3-7-85 ;;�FG 79gN ti d a 7'ia /f rO r /� ( w�� t°'X AN I- Ar V S, P»ice ' �•So Lc� Nei:? 5 , %��s62 4�� �/d XyiYrrs 6.r /C'O /f.r 'r-, /L'�2Y1 �Ql rjjrl,.r,� .'r/4 "0 C r- IVu b, 7-F¢� �trA 1 i i TYPICAL IOE AM IACATIOM VD SCALE CITY 4 G ELERIC o t a � , a. t ' ` r :a: n UKULKING iNrUkMA'11UN gr GN. No. :a: n UKULKING iNrUkMA'11UN gr GN. No. valN w.11i (aOai - IEt air. "Of wt. Voss 18M lam Tea 1 lbs. Wish F.J. Aftell feme life lte a as bollso eecoot where If / C"1011616 a • • 40"Zoss Regulator 5o "1 120 laploe RaaOtor (NPFI 50 24016 W RVoDnor 1, to NS 507 120 20! Regvlotor Repulora/ A14N•111 53 53 f01 240 Repulolor 53 HI 2" Re olator 53 CMNG1s 120 1110•We" Mt s08 lvtalon Regulator 42 6" ?40 its 277 t.7t11/sOt 120 MWOM Repulora 41 R07 240 tu"lee Cam" fN01 a e e no -We" Repulolor M•N•111 with 40 too t20.240i Mwmq Regulator Clew lamp 40 SU 200 Regulator 40 122 277 Repulolor 40 123 240o M•33 Reoeror (NPF) 5.N-111 with 37 IN 24Do Reactor(NPF) Phos.tomp 38 126 120 lla NP1) 39 C1ItNOt1 • gMrtu None • 30 WNMW F.E. R orator CfIIN181 • e e 4WWON Regulator 50 100 120 lweeloe Reactor (NPF) fig IMt 24D Reactor (IfPF) so no 120 Regulator 53 sot 208 Regulator AOI•19t111 53 so 24D Regulator 4 53 53 Us 480 R�uloata 53 fib 2W &V"l@X Rapvloro; 240 42 5I77 i711 400 MAIN# 120 s00tV11VoN M� [Weelas Regulator 41 098111,1118 • e a 4N.woN Regulator M•N-111 with 40 OOi 12044F Martyry Rogulaw Clear tamp 40 Ott 200 Regulator 40 ON 277 Regulator 40 -� OrE1 24024800 Regulator S.N•111 with 40 Ott 240 M•33 Reactor (NPF) PhDs lamp 37 240 Reactow ?F) 38 ass 34 :7MNOot MortY None 3D DIIMENSION%_. (Oval 904091 bOud►fs rotod 120440 wolfs Due factory wired lot 120.wob operation .112. of ballast fond of woolectrK control ware aPo•.c7bte' These units con easav be 1'_0 cOnrrfed 10 240•wOlt 0prahan In the field It units w.lh photoelectric control we cnonged to 240. wolf OaetOhon of ballast Men phofoelece,c control must also be chongqsa 10 240. wall OWD40n taking 1401/ fOted 24Dt480 volfl ore factory wired fa 480 wolf Cpefah00 Of ballast These can De tapir converted to 20volt `• operation In Itfe Ife'd t� • l 0 ReOcla babostl shown Dre 00001, w•.ed co• 3 w••e 123 240 wall supply. 120 k wolfs'0 OnOtOe•ecn.c c0011101 land 24' volts to to fast Whey only ?.wits. 240.Voll f1 des•,Od Mae' ••s•mfto, to ICof NO • ewfeo' w " •oceplacto *,,ad to, 24D SI O • o J, n per •fs c vo,yt wlecf.on of any 1.0 :1 •-.• woltopes 120 2W 240.2)7 /Otdef P E co'foo, separately '' ,... 8 Older eetema bouost sepatoleft OPTIONS: Sr osoD 0AAMOr - � y te.ons fNrocra /s /Pi4r�Q i?i -2(0 War# Sin tcolos regulator 1200. 277 roltogesI - Ia ACCESSORIES: - - _ {sfrna' sh•e;d 35 96249036 -frnol house a Srrar side shivid 35 9162490.2G 200, 250, 400 ANS: s"P OESfGNAftpt f i. AM Mercury t0owt N33Co-ow ti rl 401D Mercury fOolu.et N33G1•4w oR i' l �ftucatD. - aw luca— O. 551 l' F Registered Trodemork of Generol Electric Compony I�ri>,�st.r�l��;�r■ IMW1W MUNIIIIIIIIII IMENSOMME ■■ Ill MlIgfITC•/6L SAWN d9WW Oa /ACWi R y 0' 2 30 S . 40 4S 50 ?r2S ,44 0 0.73 O.Sfi 0.44 0.96 oENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY .ighfing Systems Deportment, Hendersonville, N.C. 2V39 GENERAL 0ELECTRIC .t.. ,4 ..ry TC 1,00=oTC-10OR LUMINAIRES P"AListed In ®O IONS MIN. -Pigs OTY. 30.64A - LeXen panets•for TC•t00R-70 and 5 10ow ucoloit only (Adder s6.00 is WOe_01) Following options for all T0.100 IC-100R oonflouurag0�00eirs �6landardeolorlabidek. �lohtaseor. alive colors svailsbts ( 8A•93521. 6 - 100. t 7&watt mercuryAuto-Rea. in 194,00) Other Voltages not shown any - 100,150-welt LuestoX Regulator in (NO Adder) hor voltages not shown, any - endeggnt mounting• (NO Adds" fool available j - OimN P.H ecc�isctleelory!• alf�Ibd i!1►0epla any M Y811 1A ACCESSORIES _ -PrI - - Finisl lul (gold OnOdlasdaluminum, gal 014) 11"Ifirss hap drilling eessin3for moeuIonatinigp kafA8C- cc�iej s 0.00 - Mansard Canovy:t TG1010@eidsamledtOatendardT100, .Cat. No. for units with P.E. receptacle, 103.00 3�•9816�8�0�•A1 -Cal. No.forunitswithoutP rocetl0CAZ PHOTOMETRIC DATA •pd�wrrf ri.�wiMrOrw�air�rl@CrNnr ORDERING INFORMATION) Block Not Col, No, V"G* Wall! Bollasl GUI. Wit (Lesl,Lsmo)_[G0'5.J Volts tnmq Tyus Typs Lbs. TC• 00 ACRYLIC PANELS AND 120-VOLT P.E. RECEPTACLE- 0721 276 • 170 - 1E0• aR enalor(I F) v at- ago- 338.00 120 Luoalosr Regulator 34 0721N323 316.00 120 100-WAtl onator( 1''I'I 31 326 336,60 120 Lucelos Regulator 34 C721N500 312,0 120 70• all ROaclor(NPF 1 31 620 332.00 120 Wastes Regulator 33 0721 N621 309.00 120 60•W1111 Rosclor (NPFI 31 Weslos 721N157s 276.00 120 176-WAI1 Auto -Roo. L-S-IV 31 163 962.00 120 Mercury Log (NPFI 20 166 236A0 240 H176OX39-22 Reactor (NPF) 28 174 87640 120 Auto -Roo. 31 V 176 20240 120 Lag (NPF) 20 176 23640 940 Reactor(NPF) 26 0721N160 2f6A0 120 100•Wst/ Auto -Roo. L-64V 28 162 260.00 120 Mercury Leg (NPF) 27 161 230.00 240 H100DX38.4 oalorlN NPF► 25 106 276.00 f 20 uto-Rog. IRA] 20 16s 2s0A0 120 og (NPFI 27 170236A0 240 actor PFI 26 C•100 LOWPANELS AND 120-VOLT P.E. RECEPTACLE@ C721 NUO 323AC 120 160-WIN Roaclut (NPFI V 31 2 1/ caloa Regulator 34 C121NS26 020.00 120 f00-W8R Reactor(NPF) 31 222 34040 120 Woalos Regulator 34 0721N6020 317" 120 70-Wa111 RoWIOrfNPFI 31 617 $37.00 120 Lueslos Rgyulater 33 0721N622 $1440 120 60-Watl Reactor (NPF) 31 WesloX 0721 N • 263.00 120 176-Wall Auto -Roo. L-54V 31 002 267.40 120 Mercury Lag (NPF) 20 0o6 242.00 240 HI76OX39-22 Reactor (NPFI 26 026 263.00 120 Auto -Rog. 31 V 026 267A0 120 Lao INPF) 20 038 94240 240 ResolOr 1 NPF) 26 0721No06 911111A0 120 100-Wnl Aulo-Reg. L-6-IV 26 002 266100 120 Mercury LoglNPF1 27 001 941.00 240 M1000X38.4 Reactor (NPF) 1 26 023 961.0 120 Auto -Roe. 28 019 266A0 120 Lag(NPP1 1 27 020 241he 240 ReactorINPF► 25 TO-100R ACRYLIC PANELS AND 120-VOLT P.E. RECEPTACLE@ 0721N71a 33640 120 160.wslt Reactor(NPF) M-6.111 33 $00 350,00 120 Wsslos Regulator 36 UT-21 N703 A 120 a11 ROaelor( P) 33 620 366.00 120 Lucaloa Regulator 30 C721N716 332 120 70-Walt RaaeloriNPF1 35 737 2112.00 120 Wcalas RoOulsfor 3s C721 N7311 S20AO 120 so -Wall RooNor (NPF) 33 Wcetos C721 N726 296.00 120 176-Watt Auto-RoO. $-Mill 33 606 262A0 120 Mercury Lao (NPF) 31 730 21119,00 240 H176OX30-22 Reactor (NPF i 26 C721N732 296AO 120 100•Wall Auto -Rog 30 733 260.00 120 Mercury Lag (NPF) 29 734 211040 240 041000X38.4 Reactor(10Fi 27 i i �` ro E• I NOTES � Order P.E. e0111001 separately 1600 0340 E91 (MOUNTING-){( Slipfiltdr OCCOMMO4010e 3 " OD 0010 fop 1811 COnflOW811on1) Ell Pro). Area 1.6 all 11 (TC-100. 1OOR) Elf, Prol Area is 2 6 sq.11. (TC-100 Mansard, t00R Mensardl RECOMMENDED POLES ) Suggealed mounting height 1s 10 feet. For 10 round tapered, encho►base poles, including anenP oar . bests and bell Circle templates. order C0110100 numboro below These poles will withstand winds u0 to of loss$ 90 MPHI (see wind mso. page F3) Anehsrege, weights or other details are on Once F2 Pole Col. No. (I or Fogel Frbe Go. Pots Mstertsi C8901"f01X s206AO 651 Aluminum C790MCHX: 111115.00, 652 Steel, Prime Painted C79OH02X 306,00 652 Steel, Galvanised e . II TOs Kenai City Council e CITY OF KENAI W Cap" 4 4"'f f 010/IOALaO KQNAI,AL"KA SH11 TELEPROU9213•7Ml MEMORANDUM FROMs Jeff Labahn. Land Manaqer SUBJECT: lease Aoplications Tract 8-1, CHAP S/D #4 - Cinema/ Retail/ Office - Eric Petty DATES March 29. 1985 Kenai Advisory Planning 6 Zoning Commission At the regular mestinq of the Planning Commission on March 13th, the referenced lease application and additional information was reviewed and approval was recommended to the City Council, The Commission further voted to turn the question of drainage and snow removal over to the City Engineer and the Land Manager to work out. The applicant has been advised that snow storage will not be permitted in the adjacent rights -of -way. Therefore, adequate snow storage areas must be provided on the loses property or snow hauled form the site. Also. a drainage plan must be submitted and approved by the City of Kenai prior to construction of the phased development. Lease Application Summary Applicants Eric Petty d/b/s Management Plus Legal Descriptions Tract 01. CHAP S/0 Il4 - 10.54 acres Proposed Developments Phase I - Twin Cinema/Retail - Office July 1. 1985 - June 1. 1986 Phase 11 - Retail July 1. 1986 - May 15. 1997 Phase III - Retail/Office June 1. 1907 - May 1, 1988 II TOs Kenai City Council e CITY OF KENAI W Cap" 4 4"'f f 010/IOALaO KQNAI,AL"KA SH11 TELEPROU9213•7Ml MEMORANDUM FROMs Jeff Labahn. Land Manaqer SUBJECT: lease Aoplications Tract 8-1, CHAP S/D #4 - Cinema/ Retail/ Office - Eric Petty DATES March 29. 1985 Kenai Advisory Planning 6 Zoning Commission At the regular mestinq of the Planning Commission on March 13th, the referenced lease application and additional information was reviewed and approval was recommended to the City Council, The Commission further voted to turn the question of drainage and snow removal over to the City Engineer and the Land Manager to work out. The applicant has been advised that snow storage will not be permitted in the adjacent rights -of -way. Therefore, adequate snow storage areas must be provided on the loses property or snow hauled form the site. Also. a drainage plan must be submitted and approved by the City of Kenai prior to construction of the phased development. Lease Application Summary Applicants Eric Petty d/b/s Management Plus Legal Descriptions Tract 01. CHAP S/0 Il4 - 10.54 acres Proposed Developments Phase I - Twin Cinema/Retail - Office July 1. 1985 - June 1. 1986 Phase 11 - Retail July 1. 1986 - May 15. 1997 Phase III - Retail/Office June 1. 1907 - May 1, 1988 I f I +i f i " ;r PETTY LEASE APPLICATION Poge 2 Value of Improvementei f1.120*000 (Phooe 1) P Appreieed Property Values f 026.300 Annual Leese Rents f 49.590 NOTES The reviend nit@ plan will he diopleyed at the Council meeting. It is toe large to duplicate for the pocket. JBL t .jl :e 1 CITY VFKENAI P.O. COX 680 - KANAI, ALASKA • PHONB 283.7635 LEASE APPLICATION Date tfecelvedZ 0 Le, a Nsmo of Applicank / - V Address /e ra! F,-I .O-I li a fC ldl% Buaingoo Name and Address /1/%r1�..�c %iJli/.i'T 1ts Kenai Peninsula Borough Soles Tax No. (if applicable) State Busineaa Licenee No. (if applicable) Telephone i 6.::S-� . Lot Description Cc: / 4. &A, Desired Length of Leaeo 6pirgea Proaerty to be ueel for C oy�meac tl&j , /i w Description of Developmente (type, construction, size, etc.) N.I��� r l L, )i IJl l r•H4t� .r '�::lZ - C/Lt [�s L�1 J7�1 .1�►L k /J t,kc c' �l ► c �C'� IC'f;� d �f'f)t9 e pl�it�� Ulm l l9AI L' QC- 0- J MIA19hpi Attach development plan to scalp (1" a 501), ehowLmg all buildings �IDfNG• planned. Time Schedule for Proposed Developments Beginning Date _ JL)I.Ll 10,0,5.,,� Prop000d Completion Date—, _ I r /jj % Ar P Est ionatod Value of Construction kame- • art( =--/d, Coo Dates Signeds < Dates S[gnads I DeacrLptLon of Propriety. g--1 �� •� �_�S/T) CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE (To be completed by the City) Annual rant rate or cost � (p� X Zoned for C ,tr.o��� ��. .�.� 1 cc*) Permits required Aoaoeamente Q IIA Insurance required �c s Construction muot begin by • �. Qa5 (0.1. �(,, p��u Completion date for major construct ion • t. Wo — �j•�5•l �,.q•,,�. �` !o• 1- *** — � • 1 • l3td CIO THIS APPLICATION WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE LEASE Planning Coqpiseinn Approvals Sys t-ne- _ ' , Date of Approval City Council Approvals By$ , Date of Approval Y ulork 4 IJ a .� rrre..i PTN. S'/z SE74 SEC. 3Z, T61V. RIIW 6PTN. N%2 NE%4 Sac. 5, T5N,R!!W, S.M. "a •q 43-3 TR. A igpogr IS s �Qo�.e foal 1:4�t'RMI�Ori FAR=00% z a-/ o",tea• C+��1C�pT • � ',O • ado• ..� CooK Irtcffrf I.9041157e/Af. AIR• �►� PARK Sue. Ne. 2 (9-82-52) Q � • ...i:. • - is • a sso ,1.. J . , TA. a �jQ arc. ® Los A& i a Assessor's Map ��e moo• Kenai Peninsula Borough. / NOTE — AsmW s Block NwnbM Shown in EBilIM ASINWO hnel NUMDM shown in Cirari C l PAYMENTS OVER $1,000.00 WHICH NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL OR RATIFICATION 4-3-85 VENDOR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT AMOUNT POP FOR APPROVALS jDoyle's Excavating Pay Est. No. 2 CP-Baron Park Construction 13,839.15 Southcentral Communications glee. Monitoring System PR -Water Machinery 6 Equip. 4,422.12 53421A Elec. Monitoring System FR-Savor Machinery b Equip. 4,412.13 53421b FOR RATIFICATION: National Bank of Alaska March Federal W/H Various Liability 46,588.80 Alaskan Federal Credit Union March C.U. W/H Various Liability 16,030.00 ICMA Retirement Corp. Employee Cont. Various Liability 4,737.00 Employer cant. Various Suppl. Retirement 4,183.36 ' Womon$s Resource Center Feb. Child Care Womon's Resource Accounts Receivable 9,695.98 Walters 6 Olson Miscellaneous City Insurance Non -Departmental Insurance 6,363.00 First Federal Bank REPO 3/19/85 Central Treasury Central Treasury 1,500,000.00 8.2252 Iat. _ REPO 3/29/85 Central Treasury Central Treasury 1,100,000.00 8.125X Iat. National Bank of Alaska Treasury Bill 3/19/85 Central Treasury Central Treasury 3,000,437.47 9.6 Y lat. I i ' t � REQUISITIONS OVER $1,000.00 WHICH NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL 4-3-85 VENDOR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOU Alaska Pump Rebuild 3 Distribution Pumps PR -Water Repair b Maint. 1,625.00 Airport Lighting Co. Head Assembly, Lenses, Assembly Airport M b 0 Repair 6 Maint. supplies 2,787.60 Shield for Runway Lights I `�'� �• b industrial Electric Overbaul 6 Inspect 75 HP. Water Repair b Maint. To Be Announced Motor at Wellhouse Overhaul Valves at Wellhouse Water Repair 6 Malnt. I it 0 ti fJ Q TOR Machine Co. Wellhouse pump Replacement 6 PR -Water Repair 6 Maint. Repairs IRS Roofing Furnish 6 Install Steel Siding Terminal Repair 6 Maint. 5,256.00 at Airport Se'Ana Cabinets suild 2 Walk Around Display Museum Repair 6 Maint. 1,070.00 Cabinets Wartle Appraisals Leased Land Appraisal for Airport Land Professional Services 1,100.00 Redetermination r AL PURCHASE ORDER WHITE.vENDOR CITY of ICENAI THIS PUkCHASE OkUfk LDENROD . ACCOUNTING 210 FIDALQO ST. PHONE 283.7538 NUMBEk MUST APPEAR Oti ACKAGES ANARY . ACCOUNTING KENAI, ALASKA 99611 eiA RELATING TO AND PAPER APUk, BLUE • SHIPPING & RECEIVINGCHASE. BEEN • APPROVED COPY NO. PINK . REQUISITIONER ' VENDOR NO, O°« Industrial Electric MotorsOrdered b TO and Service Date y_ Conts� Phone J SHIP VIA: RV 1e PREPAY SHIPPING • CHARGE SEPARATE ON INVOICE `oe "film xyw PURCHASES AUTHORI2EDONlY WHEN SIGNED ABOVE BY THE FINANCE DIRECTOR OR MIS AUTHORIZED AGENT "WINO, DESCRIPTIONOR ARTICLE OUANUTY p,p,y,p UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Overhaul and inspect 75 hp motor with bearings $ 786.1 3 ea. 40 hp motors, steam clean, reconditioned dI rewound w/bearings 3 as 342.20 1,026.1 Estimate for Well House No. 2 Overhaul STATEMENT BELOW READ OR MAILED TO VENDOR. PO is for all cost & freight to Kenai —freight for this PO is on PO# 10� ADDITIONAL COSTS WILL BE PAIDZTMOUT TOTAL$1 ,812.6 C� ` s IiREMENi �/z. •vw�.vC 10-43600-4538 19012 61, BY ow MUw , '�6111 7f PURCHASE ORDER - CITY OF KENAI 01 THIS PUkCHASf ORDEk MITE •VENDOR 210 FIDALQO ST. PHONE 283.7538 ALL PACKAGES ANDPAP�I CANLDENROD ACCOUNT NGING KENAI, ALASKA 99811 CHASE RELATING TO THIS PUk BLUE • SHIPPING & RECEIVINGI REEN • APPROVED COPY No. PINK • REOUISiTtONER Dare VENDOR NO. 04/03/85 Precision Machine Ordered by TO P' 0.Box 4050 Date Kenai'Alaska 99611 Conta�— Phone L Jim McDevitt, Owner 517-52-9 0- 8 SHIP VIA: BY DIUYEW GATE PREPAY SHIPPING • CHARGE o e .EROUpTAi1pN PURCHASES AUTHORIZED ONLY WHEN SIGNED ABOVE BY SEPARATE ON INVOICE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT ITEMNO. DESCRIPTION ORARTICLE ppIRID UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Overhaul the following valves per City Inspector, Well House No. 2 5 ea. - 6" isolation valves 3 ea. - 411 check valves 3 ea. - 4" isolation valves 2 ea. - 811 isolation valves 1 ea. - 81' check valve 1 ea. - 6" isolation valve Estimated labor charges to clean, disassemble, relap seats, and test above listed valves 23 hours at $35/hour $ 805.1 Estimated cost for new parts 19000.1I STATEMENT BELOW READ OR MAILED TO VENDOR. PO is for all cost & freight to Kenai —Freight for this PO is on POP IN ADDITIONAL COSTS WILL BE PAID-TMOUT TOTAL $19805.80 010-43600-4538 1,805 "�t DEPARTMENT Public Works/Water 1413/9S BY ' . o[.ARTAu.rt NfAc '� J PURCHASE ORDER CITY A OF KEN I ,Ells PURCHASE ORDEk RITE • VENDOR NUMBEk MUST APPEAR ON LDENROD •ACCOUNTING 210 FIDALGO ST. PHONE 283.7638 ALL PACKAGES AND PAPEkS ANARY • ACCOUNTING KENAI, ALASKA 09811 RELATING to ,Hls Puk BLUE - SHIPPING & RECEIVING CHASE al • APPROVED COPY No. PINK -REQUISITIONER VENDOR NO. Dw 04/03/85 I TBE Machine Company, Inc. Ordered by_� TO Date Contact Phone L J C SHIP VIA: BY OUlvtw OA't PREPAY SHIPPING - CHARGE o e oEo OUOIA►ION PURCHASES AUTHORIZED ONLY WHEN SIGNED ABOVE BY SEPARATE ON INVOICE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OR ARTICLE OUAMIh' UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 001110 Pump Replacement and Repairs $3,100.1 Estimate for Well House No. 2 Overhaul :..-. including labor and parts STATEMENT BELOW READ OR MAILED TO VENDOR. PO is for all cost dl freight to Kenai Freight for this PO is on 1P0# IM ADDITIONAL COSTS WILL BE PAID-TMOUT DEPART z4o' 7A rS BY_ 1 TOTAL $3000.00 rks Water Rev ShE { i I . G-� Suggested bys Mayor Wagoner CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1029-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1984-1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $10330 TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT DESIGNED TO PLANT AND REMOVE TREES. WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase a backhoe attachment to plant and remove trees, and WHEREAS, this purchase was not anticipated in the 1984-1985 annual budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenue and appropriations be mades General Fund ncresee Estimated Revenues Appropriation of Fund Balance $1,330 Increase Appropriationes Parka -Machinery and Equipment $1,330 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTESTs anet Whelan, City erk First Readings April 3, 1985 Second Readings April 17, 1985 1 Effective Dates April 179 1985 Approved by Finances C 'P _ i I i SUBSTITUTE C Suggested bys Councilman Wise CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1030-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSITION OF TRACTS A, 8, AND C, DENA-INA POINT ESTATES UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has authorized the sale of City -owned lands known as Tracts A, 8, and Co Denalins Point Estates Subdivision by competitive sealed bid on April 29, 19859 and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has recognized an initiating sale applicant who has the privilege to meet the high bid in accordance with KMC 22.05.040 (b)(6), and WHEREAS, the referenced property is to be conveyed by a single land sale unit consisting of approximately 80 acres, and WHEREAS, in the event that the described property is not sold as a result of the referenced April 29, 1985 competitive bid sale, it is desirable that the City offer this land for sale under certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, as followss Section 1s That the provision of KMC 22.05.040 (b)(6), shall no app y to the sale of Tracts A, 8, and C, Dena'ina Point Estates Subdivision. Section 2s That this ordinance to declared void if Tracts A, B, an , ena'ins Point Estates Subdivision is sold as offered by the City of Kenai in competitive sealed bid sale on April 29, 1985. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Readings April 3, 1985 Second Readinqs April 17, 1985 Effective Dates April 17, 1985 P � f` Cy . Y Suggested hys Councilman Wise "p CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0, 1030-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSITION OF TRACTS A, B, AND C, DENA'1NA POINT'ESTATES UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has authorized the sale of City -owned lands known as Tracts A. B, and C, Dena'ina Point Estates Subdivision by competitive sealed bid on April 29, 1965, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has recognized an initiating sale applicant who has the privilege to meet the high bid in accordance with KMC 22.05.040 (b)(6)9 and WHEREAS, the referenced property to to be conveyed by a single land sale unit consisting of approximately 80 acres, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is likely to receive a minimal amount of bidding interest in this land sale due to the preferential bidding provision and the size of the sale tract, and WHEREAS, in the event that the described property is not sold as a result of the referenced April 29, 1985 competitive bid sale, it is desirable that the City offer this land for sale under certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, as follower Section 1s That the provisions of KMC 22.05.040 (b)(6), KMC 205.00(a) and KMC 22.05.040 (f) shall not apply to the sale of Tracts A, B, and C, Denalins Point Estates Subdivision. Section 2s That this ordinance to declared void if Tracts A, 89an-d--"t ena'ins Point Estates Subdivision is sold so offered by the City of Kenai in competitive sealed bid sale on April 29, 1985. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, RIVOR ATTESTS cJanet Whelan, y er First Readings April 3, 1985 F Second Readinqs April 17, 1995 Effective Dates May 17, 1985 i 4 ` i i E I 1t f 0 Suggested bys Librarian CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1031-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1904-85 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY $3,000 FOR LIBRARY DONATIONS. WHEREAS, the City has received approximately $2,366 in library donations and charges for lost and damaged books, and WHEREAS, the City expects to receive at least $634 as donations and charges for lost and damaged books by the end of the current fiscal year, and the Librarian has personally guaranteed to donate the difference if that amount is not received, and WHEREAS, the Librarian hoe asked that this money be appropriated for the purchase of library books. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI,-ALASKA, that the following increases in estimated revenues and appropriations be modes General Fund ncresse Estimated Revenuess Library Donations $3,000 Increase Appropristiones Library -Books $3,000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. 0M WAGONERt MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Readings April 39 1985 Second Readings April 17, 1985 Effective Dates April 17, 1985 Approved by Finances f Suggested bys City Clerk 4 CITY OF KENAI f i ORDINANCE NO. 1032-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, TO AMEND KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE 1.57.030 AND KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE 11.10.030 TO HAVE APPOINTMENT DATES FOR HARBOR COMMISSION AND LIBRARY COMMISSION MEMBERS BEGIN ON JANUARY 1. WHEREAS, Harbor Commission members' terms begin in March, and Library Commission members' terms begin in July, and WHEREAS, all other commissions within the City government begin their terms in January, and WHEREAS, for record keeping purposes, having all terms begin in January would be more efficient. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THATs 1. KMC 1.57.030 be amended to reads 1,57.030 Terms and Aepointments to Vacanciess (a) The terms of seven appointed members of Be commission shall be three Years except initial appointments shall be abbreviated terms so that terms in three years shall be staggered. (1) Two members shall be appointed for one year, two members shall be appointed for two years, and three members shall be appointed for three years. After the expiration of the initial appointments of all seven members, all reappointments or new appointees shall be appointed for three year terms. (b) Terms shall commence on [DULY 11 January 1 of each year. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor and confirmation of the City Council. (Ord 852) 2. KMC 11.10.030 be amended to reads 11.10.030 Terms of Commission Members (a) The term of each appointed member of the Commission shall be 3 years, except initial appointments shall be for abbreviated terms so that terms in 3 years shall be staggered. The terms shall be staggered so that 3 members shall be appointed every third year and 2 members shall be appointed in each of the other years of every such 3 year period. 1 n (b) Terms shall commence on (MARCH 71 January 1 of each year. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor and confirmation of the City Council as set out in the Charter of the City of Kenai. (Ord 474) PASSED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day -- of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: j i - :... Janet Whelan, C ty Clerk First Readings April 3, 1985 - Second Readings April 17, 1985 Effective Oates April 17, 1985 ( `, i t. F" j a i o '. 2 R = I. ' If' i 1 I SUBSTITUTE 7 Suggested bys Planning & Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1033-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, AMENDING KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 14.20.180 AND 14.20.320 (b)(69) CONCERNING THE VARIANCE PERMIT DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE KENAI ZONING CODE. WHEREAS, the Kenai Zoning Code provides for the issuance of a variance permit by the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission if certain conditions have been satisfied by the petitioner, and WHEREAS, certain deficiencies in the variance permit section of the Code have created review problems for the Commission, and WHEREAS, the existing review criteria are too general and do not include certain conditions which should be considered in evaluating a variance permit request, and WHEREAS, the proposed revision of the variance permit section includes a more accurate intent statement and more descriptive review criteria, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted by the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission on March 27, 1965 in accordance with the Kenai Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance permit sectionpin accordance with adopted Resolution No. PZ 85-19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that KMC 14.20.180 and 14.20.320 (b) (69) are ealed and re-enected as follows: 14.20.180 Variance Permits (a) Intent: A variance means the relaxation of the development requirements of this chapter to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property. (b) Permit Application: An application for a variance permit shall be filed in writing with the administrative official and signed by the owner of the property concerned. i1 1 1) The application shall contain the followings (i) A legal description of the property involved; (ii) Plans showing the location of all existing and proposed buildings or alterations, elevations of such buildings or alterations, and such data as may be required. (c) Review Criteria: The Commission shall establish a finding that all of the conditions have been found to exist as a prerequisite to issuance of a variance permit. 1) Special conditions or circumstances are present which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the same land use or zoning district. 2) The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute pecuniary hardship or inconvenience. 3) The granting of the variance shall not authorize a use that is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. 4) The granting of a variance shall be the minimum variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. 5) The granting of a variance shall not be based upon other non -conforming land uses or structures within the sale land use or zoning district. (d) Public Hearings The public hearing and notification procedure for a variance application shall be r accomplished in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. (e) Permit Expiration and Extensions An approved variance permit shall lapse 12 months from the date of approval if no certificate of occupancy has been issued by the Building Official. The Commission may grant a time extension not to exceed six months upon a finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. A request for extension must be submitted prior to expiration of the permit. A public hearing shall not be required as a condition to granting the extension. t 14.20.320 Definitions (b) (69) "Variance" means the relaxation of the development requirements of this chapter to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. i iTOM WAGONER, MAYOR J & - 7 Suggested by% Planning & Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 1033-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 14.20.180 AND 14.20.320 (b)(69) CONCERNING THE VARIANCE PERMIT DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE KENAI ZONING CODE. WHEREAS, the Kenai Zoning Code provides for the issuance of a variance permit by the Kenai Advisory planning & Zoning Commission if certain conditions have been satisfied by the petitioner, and WHEREAS, certain deficiencies in the variance permit section of the Code have created review problems for the Commission, and WHEREAS, the existing review criteria are too general and do not include certain conditions which should be considered in evaluating a variance permit request, and WHEREAS, the proposed revision of the variance permit section includes a more accurate intent statement and more descriptive review criteria, and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted by the Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission on March 27, 1985 in accordance with the Kenai Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance permit section amendments in accordance with adopted Resolution No, PZ 85-19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED 8Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, as followes 14.20.180 Variance Permits (a) Intents A variance means the relaxation of the development requirements of this chapter to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property. (b) Permit Applications An application for a variance permit shall be filed in writing with the administrative official and signed by the owner of the property concerned. ■ • 1) The application shall contain the followings (i) A legal description of the property involveds (ii) Plans showing the location of all existing and proposed buildings or alterations, elevations of such buildings or alterations, and such data as may be required. (c) Review Criteria: The Commission shall establish a finding that all of the conditions have been found to exist as a prerequisite to issuance of a variance permit. 1) Special conditions or circumstances are present " which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the some land use or zoning district. 2) The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such J conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute pecuniary hardship or inconvenience. 3) The granting of the variance shall not authorize a " use that is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. 4) The granting of a variance shall be the minimum n variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. 5) The granting of a variance shall not be based upon other non -conforming land uses or structures within the sale land use or zoning district. (d) Public Hearings The public hearing and notification procedure for a variance application shall be accomplished in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. (e) Permit Expiration and Extensions An approved variance permit shall lapse 12 months from the date of approval if no certificate of occupancy has been issued by the Building Official. The Commission may grant a time extension not to exceed six months upon a findinq that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. A request for extension must be submitted prior to expiration of the permit. A public hearing shall not be required as a condition to grantinq the extension. 14.20.320 Definitions (b) (69) "Variance" means the relaxation of the development requirements of this chapter to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA1, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. ITOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet elan, y er - First Reading: April 3, 1985 Second Reading: April 17, 1985 Effective Date: May 17, 1985 =r• ri .. I f - I R h - j ` 1 1 14.20.170-14.20.180 compliance with Horizontal Property Regimes Act, AS 34.07 has been made prior to the sale of any townhouse dwelling units, and further: [i] The developer or subdivider of any Planned Unit Residential Development shall deposit with the appropriate homeowners' association, formed in compliance with the Horizontal Property Regimes Act cited in this section, a. contingency fund in the sum of $500 per dwelling -unit in the townhouse development; [ii] A copy of the'by-laws of the homeowners' association showinq:in what manner the aforesaid contingency fund shall be controlled shall be furnished to the City for review and approval. (Ord 925) 14.20.180 Variance Permits: (a) Intent. A variance means a relaxation of The deve opmant requirements of this chapter in 0 cases where unusual physical features of the property would make strict application of the zoning regulations unreasonable. (b) Prncedure. (1) An application for a variance permit shall be filed in writing with the administrative official and signed by the owner of the property concerned. [i] The application shall contain the following: (a) A legal description of the property involved; (b) Plans showing the location of all existing and proposed buildings or alterations, elevations of such buildings or alterations, and such data as may be required. (�1 [ii] The application for a variance shall contain a statement and adequate evidence showing the following conditions, all three of which must exist before a variance may a ranted: -(a) That there are exceptional physical cir-_ cumstances or conditionw applicable to the property or to its intended use or development which do hot apply generally to the other properties in the same land use district; (b) That the strict application of the provisions Ap of this chapter would result in practical dif- do ficulties or unnecessary hardship; (c) That the granting of the variance will not result in material damage to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. [iii] The public hearing and notification procedure Z for a variance application shall be accomplished in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. (2) An approved variance permit shall lapse 12 months from the date of approval if no certificate of occupancy has been issued by the Building Ufficial. The Commission may grant a .00 time extension not to exceed six" months upon a finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. A renuest for extension must be :submitted prior to expiration of the permit. A public s ;caring shall not be required as a condition to granting the extension. (Orris 925, 987) 14- 35 (City of Kenai Supp. 032 - 11l11!94) m I 1 a Cl- - s--- Suggested bys Planning A Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1034-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 14 REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (IL) AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (IN) ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the Kenai Zoning Code Development Requirements Table stipulates certain minimum yard setbacks within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning district, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Zoning Code Development Requirements Table has no minimum yard setbacks within the Heavy Industrial (IN) zoning district, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning do Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the establishment of certain development standards within the Heavy Industrial (IN) district at their meeting on March 27, 1985, and WHEREAS, the Commission concurred that minimum aide and rear setbacks are not essential within the Light Industrial (IL) and r�. Heavy Industrial (IN) zoning districts, and WHEREAS, the Commission concurred that the development requirements within both industrial zoning districts should be consistent, and WHEREAS, the Commission unanimously adopted amended Resolution PZ No. 85-20 to revise the development requirements governing the Light Industrial (IL) and Heavy Industrial (IN) zoning districts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Development Requirements Table of the Kenai Zoning Code shall be amended as presented in "Attachment All, PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of April, 1985. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Readings April 3, 1985 J Second Readings April 17, 1985 Effective Dates May 17, 1985 m H n NC CACNMENT 110 USES Rtt RR- KS ItS- RS-2 RIL in CC� CG MINIMUM LOT AREA (sq.ft.) 40,000 40,000 19200 '200'000 7,200 7,200 5,000 5,000 with,public water and/or sower* 20,000 20,000 7,200 12,500 7,200 7,200 5,000 51000 MINIMUM MULTI -FAMILY LOT AREA (sq. ft.) 40,000/ 4 - family dwelling 209000* N/A 9,600 N/A N/A 7,200 - - Sub. to 5 - family dwelling - N/A 10,000 N/A N/A Commission - - Avproval See Individua - .� N/A 12,000 N/A N/A Sub. to Commissionr 6 - family dwelling Sections for Requirdments - N/A - 7 - family dwelling Approval MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 90' 60' 60' 60' 60' 60' 60' 25' 25' 25' 25' 10, 25' 25' MINIMUM YARD Front Side 15' 51 51 51 52 Rear 20' 20' 20' 20' 102 _ 30% 302 30% 30% 40% - - MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 35' 35' 35' 35' - - - MAXIMUM HEIGHT 1 For structures with tiara than one story in height, the minimum side yard shall be 15 feet. Except that for each full story over 214 stories each side and rear yard shall be increased three (3) feet. 14-61 (City of Kenai ----- Seipp. 034 - 3/0/85 ) i G I' C + CITY OF KENAI %0d ea#W */ 4" 210 FIDALOO MWAN ALASM 00611 TEWPMONE M - 7W MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai Citv Council FROM: eff Labahn. Land Manager SUBJECT Lease Amendments Lot 5. Blk 1. Gusty S/D - Car Wash Addition - Patrick Doyle DATES March 29. 1985 At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 27th, the referenced lease amendment was discussed and a site plan depicting the proposed addition was reviewed. The motion below is a result of that reviews MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved approval of the lease amendment on the referenced property subject to the resolution of any easement problems with a project completion date of 8/1/85, seconded by Commissioner Osborne VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. jai 0 i 1 r L• I :i W March 20, 1985 City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska, 99611 Attention: Jeff Labahn Dear Mr. Labahn: Re: Lot 5, Block 1 Gusty Subdivision As per our conversation regarding the additions to the Car Wash on the above lot, I am enclosing a Sketch which shows the following: Gas Pumps to be installed 24 X 46 Addition on the North End of our Building, to be used for Detailing. It is our plan to have the above completed by early Summer. Upon com- pletion, we will Landscape and Pave this Area. Thank you for your attention to this matter, Sincerely, `Patrick J. 40yle o ej•24— i r ti� ■,r r 7=' a ;p Building Ske#ch FRY1:HOLftR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL P.O. BOX 1413 - j SOLDOTNP ALASKA 99069 �gotfishs Cr' -- l � d s -' 14 ABoi AK8.9 MI March 22, i985 ell �. The Kenai City Mayor and Council Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mayor and Council: The enclosed guidelines for Pottery Studio Use, adopted by the Kenai - Potters Guild, March 18, 1985, were resolved by following the purposes of the Kenai Fine Arts Center and the guild's By-laws. -- We feel these guidelines will meet the mayor's and council's approval. ' Respectfully, 7.' Pe gy �G III Thompson Secretary C� Y t I F GUIDELINES: POTTERY STUDIO USE i Adapted March 18, 1985 r� j A. Purpose of Studio i. Workshops. 2. Classes. i 3. Develop skills and trade. B. Pottery Studio Use 1. Only Potters Guild members can fire the Pottery Studio kiln. 2. Members may have only six (6) personal firings per year. C. Studio Potters Fees - r 1. Use of studio 30 hours, or less, per week: $30 per month. 2. Use of studio more than 30 hours per week: $60 per month. Alt, D. Cost per Firing: $50 (Firing includes bisque, giazes, and gas fire.) Any diviation from above rules must have p for approval of a majority of guild members, at a regular meeting. The above guildellnes became effective at time of adoptions. March 18, 1985.' �.d G. - I 1 CITY OF KENAI %Od Ggae" 4 4" VoRULGo KlNAI,ALMM Ho„ TMMKON6 M- Mil March 28, 1985 TOs Wm, J. Brighton, City Manager FROMs Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works SUBJECTS EPA Grant for Discussion at Council Meeting of April 3, 1985 Enclosed please find my letter of March 15, 1985, along with other information that was given to Council at the last meeting concerning the EPA Grants to communities for construction of major sewer interceptors. At that last Council meeting, Public Works was asked to come up with a recommendation listing which projects should be submitted to EPA. Public Works recommends that we send a letter of confirmation concerning our past request on the East Kenai Interceptor. Public Works also feels that the Beaver Loop West Interceptor should be dropped from the requests for EPA funding. We feel this way because of the high costs that would have to be borne by the City of Kenai. The existing EPA grant application for the East Kenai Interceptor is for a sewer line from Swires to Thompson Park. If the Council is willing to spend the extra money, that line could be extended all the way out to the far end of East Kenai or Swallow Drive. According to Wince, Corthell, Bryson's recent study concerning the sewer costs to this area, a total of $2,395,000 would be needed. Of that amount, the EPA would, if the grant was accepted, fund $1,317,250. This means that the City of Kenai would have to come up with $1,077,750. Based on the high cost to the City of Kenai for running these sewer interceptor lines, I would recommend that we confirm our past project for the East Kenai Sewer Interceptor Line to Thompson Park and leave that as our only request. KK/jet Enclosures • _J 1 I CITY OF KENAI ea#w 4 4"11 r, 210FIDALOO KBNAI.ALASKA 90611 -~ TEWHON6 2r3. Mf March 15, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: William J. Brighton, City Manager FROM: Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: EPA Grants FORS City Council Meeting of March 20, 1985. Please find enclosed a letter from Dick Marcum, Chief of Municipal Grants for the Department of Environmental Conservation dated March 12, 1985. Basically DEC is asking for a letter confirming our past requests or completion of new applications (� for new projects. EPA provides grants to communities for constructing sewage treatment plants and major sewer interceptors. On the second page of the letter Mr. Marcum mentions some items that our Council needs to consider when determining which projects will be on the priority list. The first item on their list is the statement that EPA will onlZ fund 55 percent of the eligible cost which would require 45 percent matching funds. On the third page of the letter is a list of the projects that were submitted last year. As you can see, the East Kenai Interceptor would show that the City would have to come up with $6979950.00. For the Beaver Loop West Interceptor, the City would have to come up with $544#500.00. The second item DEC wants us to consider is that the state match will not be available unless it is specifically funded in the DEC budget. There is a possibility that the East Kenai Interceptor project may be funded through the ADEC budget. This project has been listed for fiscal year 86 by DEC, but they would have to receive close to $16 million dollars for it to be included. Please see the DEC list which is attached. There are other points that DEC has brought out in their letter and 1 encourage you to read it thoroughly, but the ones I mentioned above are the most important. The Council needs to make a decision as to which projects shnsild be submitted to EPA for inclusion in their priority planning .� list. a J t; DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL, CONSERVATION March 12, 1985 BILL SHEFFIEW, GOVERNOR relsPho"04907/ 465-2610 Address: onurh 0 99811 Mr. Keith Kornelis `'' ""yc1 Director of Public Works 1pubp0 w01ksuuep�. r 210 Fidalgo dO Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mr. Kornelis: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides grants to communities for constructing sewage treatment plants and maJor sewerage interceptor t es This program s e ng carr a out n as a y t e Alaska Department of Env ronmental Conservation (ADEC), Since there is insufficient funding to build all projects every year, we must determine which projects will be funded each year. Project selection is accomplished in several steps. The approximate schedule this year will be as follows: 1. ADEC requests information about projects from communities (March 15). 2. ADEC criteria evaluation of projects (April 15-30). 3. ADEC publishes the project list and holds a public hearing to allow community comment (May 1-30). Time is allowed for written comments, 4. ADEC finishes the list and submits it to EPA for approval (June 15). S. EPA approval (October 15). 6. EPA funds the projects (November 15). Last June, wastewater interceptor and treatment plant projects for which communities provided information were evaluated using the criteria established via the public participation phase of the project. From the list of eligible projects ready for construction this fiscal year, a priority list was developed. In considering the funding amount, the projects ready to apply for a grant, and the scoring criteria, the Anchorage Pt, Woronzof Wastewater Treatment Plant was the only project funded this year. Other projects are included on the planning priority list. We are now evaluating projects for the next federal fiscal year, which begins October 1, 1985. If you wish to be considered for next year's priority list, please fill out one form (Enclosure 2) for each project, or I. 4 .y I -2- Ma rch 12, 1985 tr gou alreagg have a Project on the planning list (Enclosure --affirm. in writin-g. It VOUo r a e sure to provide any necessary updated information. It is essential cost estimates be accurate since additional funds will not likely -be ava a e o cover increases based upon poor Initial estimates. Enclosure 3 is the proposed scoring criteria for FY 86 projects. If you have comments or question about the criteria, please send them to me. In deciding whether you want to be considered on this year's priority list, please keep the following restrictions in mind. 1. Next year's projects are anticipated -to be funded by EPA at 55i; A A A A pad" wnwu w ww s ..wr-" 3. Collector sewers are not eligible. 4. A Facility Plan, as described in Federal Regulations 40 CFR 36.2030, must be submitted to ADEC before a project can be placed on the current year's priority list. S. The Facility Plan will take at least a year to develop and obtain approval. It must be approved before a grant can be made. 6. A set of plans and specifications, in most cases must be prepared and approved before a grant can De made. i T. Funding is not provided for developing either a facility plan or engineering plans and specifications. Those costs must be initially j paid for by the community. If a grant is made for constructing a j project, an allowance may be paid for the facility plans and plans and specifications, contingent upon available funding. 8. Although you will probably design and build your facility for a j 20-year population projection, gPA can b .guccmtjogulation- cons gently, the funded gortion of most project will be considerably less than half the projecteroject costs, If you wish to be considered for next year's priority list, please complete .j_n.ft nuestionnaire or affirm in writing, by Aril 15 1985, you wish to remain on the Dr ority 11st. Si ncerelly, 90 Dick Marcum, Chief Municipal Grants Enclosures: FY85 Project Priority List Questionnaire Scoring Criteria Easiesw4 1 • EPA PROJECT ;9I0RIIY PLANNINS LIST FYBS "C'AL CITY WE ELIBISLE MT EN SRANT :.148 A1QbliAO� mom 8TP-SES4FlfIT III, DMASEB 411 1717MI t2818298 I,141 AIR3MI . '�. FBIM MIIN•CWESTBR CREEP{ 3991211 2993W ANI11M ! "� C1PS81 Cm &NTERWGR 965mm 7E411a we OEUCW »: c: • SIP 13510111 72:w 9� no Ipi0EIm DIEM 3081i - 0 92 JIAMiIt. NORTH an SOM M MISOKU COIFOST JAINNISNT MR 3874M 76911a1 a7VU 3mes 74O OIIL.Now SEMA6E TREATMENT FACILITY 4�9•„p)O 931 am UK SORM AAKTOVIK STP Mm 1lum as$ NOTE VP E1"WICN IstsJl1ii 84v 8Z1 aYpgtiA6f JtiNlAtl PT. WCRCNIOF WALL EXTENSION Esom 13718m 1375M iB2A1481 all sEtJioetA � EhOt'4WA.1. cjt .1.4n. QTCR WEST VALL s~P 1O70,SQ0i IM140 0 PETEASBURB- ST9 7L46 sslleav �� 73 a vE*EEuRe Alm BAY :WE..gm ;CR/BTP Isasmu M 1 1 611 FAIASANKS : STP E7ICANSICN 3O71Qi� 6H NOW A SIP EKWGIICN m 981 1%7ERmnq 34t11O1 66 187II61f .e " `r/ . _ S81 so C IRM COAOOVA ;UR CREE,1 :ATEflom t1000YS a2m 6m � . :81 Rol SM: Flt;,.:Y'Er�"wi EAST Awl I'�RER��R 1311115 .43111E , 7�.. a,. ' 1SSIM :•6 9i: 91�0 29 w MUM G ACRE RIVERJV.TNE =S :.r., :/t Ci2A9ECT;CN 126ZZ/111 7811118 69.9� 4am -� go .'L7YEAli MIMES J-8 SLL•CCfR: OFaiATRIM /I i@3811O S7f19� sunMRItE S? Aim°81 2.�� i 471 451 SOLOO*VA KENAt PENI�SitLA MMM A:4FC9T TriCA*CR SEC'ABE /NCth'aA'wi 2696M 284M i S1 9A BOLOOT1Yi !(EiAt aIVE3SI0E iYf:�CEDTOR :280010 66 r I :AVER =0 DES! :YTERCO",, 2t11�1O 663 s'i%ys4� iSTRW... :81 !R ER ,s. , 3 siL:NO 'IVE.WTOR 24:a01 23 M ?� N Enclosure L PRIORITY LIST QUESTIONNAIRE Your Name and Title Date Municipality Name of project Description of project (what is to be done) Need for project (why you need it) List aRy health hazards that will be eliminated or relieved by this project (if not already mentioned above) List any pending enforcement actions requiring the construction of this project Estimate of existing population benefitting from the project Existing sewage effluent is discharged to: Marine water Fresh water Name of water body, If project will result in the sewage effluent being discharged to another receiving water, please name W, _ H L .N a List uses of the receiving water accepting the sewage effluent Describe location of sewage effluent in relation to drinking water source (if not into salt water) Estimated Completion Date Step 1, facility Plan Step 2, Design Estimated Grant Estimated Cost Completion Date ' Step 3, Construction Percentage of Component Project Component Component Costs as % Cost Qualifying as of Total Project Costs Innovative or Alternative �.. (Total = 100%) Technology (if known) Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Advanced Treatment _-' Sewer Rehab-I/I Correction Treatment Plant Rehab _ Interceptor Sewer & Pump Stations 5 l T" Project priority rar�;ings are determined according to the following eight categories. Appropriate points are assigned to arrive at a point total and ' priority ranking for each project: I. Project Component In determining the relative priority of the various project components AOEC emphasizes the importance of maximizing the benefits to be achieved from limited federal funds. Project components required to achieve compliance with State water quality standards and to protect public - health will receive higher consideration than project components required by federal law, which may provide treatment beyond what is required to protect health or the environment. Hence, secondary or advanced treatment projects, when required in order to satisfy the NPOES permit or other portions of federal law, may be phased on the priority list so that the initial phase would meet water quality and health considerations, and the final phase would be con- structed at a later date, subject to availability of funds. Projects for collection sewers, storm sewers, and correction of combined sewer overflows are not considered eligible project categories for use of funds allocated to Alaska. Projects are assigned a point total by multiplying the point value of the project component by the percentage of cost that a specific component bears to the total eligible project cost and then summing the point values computed for the components. r Components Points -' ,• a) Initial phase(s) of treatment discharging 300 ' into marine waters required to protect public health or achieve water quality standards; i. secondary treatment for discharge into fresh water; or any treatment required prior to discharge to groundwater. b) Rehabilitation or expansion of treatment 250 facilities or correction of infiltration/ inflow of sewage collection systems where - existing conditions are disrupting the effi- ciency of existing treatment facilities. c) Rehabilitation or correction of infiltration/ 200 inflow of sewage collection systems where the required corrections are done in conjunction with a need treatmwnt facility. d) Constriction of new interceptor sewers, pump 150 stations, and a,pu rtenances. e) Upgrading existing treatseent facilities to 100 secondary or advanced wastewsater treatment levels when required for raasons other than r►eeting water quality standards or protection of public health. i i i 1 .I i ! I IF 1k IL Z , II. Project Water Quality y Need To date, ADEC has not completed an approved water quality management plan. However, information that will be the basis for this plan was taken into consideration in allocating points to projects in this category.• Points awarded for one section only. Points a) Project necessary to treat or eliminate a 400 discharge contributing to a documented violation of the Alaska Water Quality Standards. b) Project necessary to minimize or eliminate 300 documented "non -point source" contamination of groundwater or surface waters resulting from subsurface sewage disposal systems. c) Project will result in a measurable enhance- 200 ment of water quality but is not required to meet the Alaska Water Quality Standards. d) Project necessary to prevent potential 100 water pollution problems or where the environment may be adversely affected due to the impact of accelerated development or industrial growth. III. Regulatory Emphasis for Violation of Water Quality Standards a) Project ne essary to comply with the effluent 30 limitation.: contained 'i n an NPDES permit for a point source discharge. b) Notice of Violation issued by ADEC or EPA. s0 c) Compliance Order issued by ADEC or EPA. 80 d) _.Charges filed by State Attorney General or 100 legal counsel for EPA. IV. Public Health Emphasis Verificati-,t from a State or local health official 100 that a is necessary to avert or Corr:::- 's public he: ,. *azard. Umi''%ri*T ? V. Receiving Water Usage - Adversely Affected by Existing Dischar e s project will eliminate the adverse affect.) a) freshwater/Groundwater Points 1) Drinking and food processing 100 2) Propagation of fish and shellfish used as 50 a food source 3) Water contact recreation 20 b) Marine Water 1) Propagation of fish and shellfish as a 50 food source 2) Water contact recreation 20 - VI. Project Continuity - Points awarded for each section, if applicable. ' a) A facility plan has been developed and submitted 70 y to ADEC for approval or has already been approved. b) Construction plans and specifications have been 70 developed and submitted to ADEC for review or r -have already been reviewed. c) Project is part of segmentation package which has 50 +_ been approved by EPA VII. Existing Population Senefittino from Project a) under 1,000 30 b) between 1,000 and f,500 50 c between 3,500 and 10,000 70 I` d; over 10,000 100 r 1 �+ tr VIII. Alternative or Innovative Step-2 b 3 or 3 projects identified in an approved 30 °_, fact li ty , plan as containing alternative or innovative technology components shall qualify for 30 points in _ : = addition to all other points awarded to the project _.... ya pt SCORE MUNICIPALI'Y r 678 KLAW0O1 i• S98 KErY1I � 28 NORT4 SLOPE BOROUGH 575 KDTIEBUE 95 JfUNEAU 525 AN N 513 BRISTOL BAY BOROUGH 515 NORTH POLE $1S THORNE SAY 510 GALENii 508 CRAIG 588 AMU 'a0 JUNEAIi i85 KENAi 485 %,Dgr4 9LODE BOROUGH 498 NORTH WE SORO.uH 475 VALDEI 478 DILL:! &AM 478 ?AIRBA&%S 478 FAIN S 478 KE•w+:•04 GA AY SORD 465 NCR.o 2,=- 463 NORM SLCFE BCAMSi� 465 PET--RSBURS 468 %CRTH SLOPE SCEM 43: 6 STATE SANITAT PRIORITY LIST 11/89/84 PR0w NAIE FUNDING - ADEC C1WATIVE TOTAL EAST KLAWOCK WATER AND SEWER 308.888 308,808 PRINCESS, CIVERELLA. MCCCL:L". ALIAK, N 688.008 solo AGIC WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ATOASUK SUM TREATMENT FACILITY 1.m.008 1,988,088 SEWAGE LAGOON IMPROVEMENTS 150.008 218%om HSNDEMftL VALLEY STP EXPANSION. S S"ENT 1,292.= 3,342,508 II i III, LIQUID TREAT. P81ENNALL VALLEY SEVER I/I CORREC::CN 51117590 3,85492% NAKNEK SOLID WASTE PROTECT 758,088 4,684.28 HIGHWAY PARK WATER AND SEWER 1,389.008 54993,218 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER RENOVATION 1,345.888 7,338.2% WATER DISTRIBUTICN AND WASTEWATER COLLEC 2,088,088 9,338,2% TION WATER SWAGE 3.880.008 13,138.?w8 MENDENMALL PENINSULA DISTRIBUTION 1,e97,528 14,225,753 MENDETku VALLEY STP EXPANSICN, S WENT 621,600 14,841,339 IV i V, SOLIDS TREATMENT EAST KENAI INTEACEPTOR-toMPSON HARK SE'a 1,883.d08 ls,93a,3:8 ER 101PROV£9rNTS �,,,,w 44.•� P KAKTOVIK SUASE OiSFOSAL 74=9 16.672.85a ATQASUK WATER TREATMENT FACILITY 1,008.808 17.672.03 CAMPGROUNDS SANITARY DUMP STATION ILNI /7,682.858 SUERASE TREATMENT FACILITY 709.009 18.382.8:8 N. E. INTERCEPTOR -PHASE :I 19.149 18.532,w8 SEWER MWALL EXTENSICN 55.200 18,587.8% SOUTH TONSASS SBRVICE DISTRICT SF*SR ON. too 19,437.858 NORTNAEST M E.R INTERCc'PT3R AND WATER :R 1.9b3.-0a 21491.30 ANSNISS*&CN LINES WAIW, IGHT WATER TyjP:Lf LINE 1.022.008 22.391.3r8 HAMMER AND .411 19L000H SaIR EX"E%S:DN 228.088 22.619.358 WAISWRIGhT S"aaE DISPOSAL 1.730.c:8 24.349.808 SrRL'CE. aD. 3RD MCI °.-H WAMA AND SEMER 3a0.2i"a 2a.649. £a0 IMPROVEMENTS SCOW MY AREA 919441 SYSTEM. 678. L25 3.328. yc� i VMIR/S£.2R i 49DE ;4. 1. a0?EAOSY XmE n.371 5.793.4% REPAIR 8; c?':ERINEV _r:VT So"s:C.9.:=:4E ? 3.997.U6 c3.?a:.15e 3.a32.t63 32.3i3.::5 4 J �• - FY 86 STATE SANITAT*,CN PROJECT PRIORITY LIST 11/09/84 TOTAL SCORE MUNICIPALITY PROJECT NAPE FUNDING • AEC CLmuTIVE TOTAL�j 425 AN" EAST NENDENHALL VALLEY DISTRIBUTICN 19%3,20 34,5!b,625 426 ANGDON GARBAGE DUMP tMPROVEPIENT 50,000 349686,14 420 NONE LANDFILL IMPROVEMENTS 123.20 34.730, �,. 420 NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH BARROW LANDFILL 1.800.800 33.730.125 420 PETERSBURG WATER PLANT CLARIFICATION SYSTEM M.me 36'am, 125 420 SOLDOTNA SLUDGE OEWATERER 68.880 36.140.125 420 ( 410 WASILLA NEIYA( �- 7s T STEW EXP"90--,•-•, RKDAKWWATER 1 2" w 37.340. t25 _ IMPROVEMENTS 0:880� 37,698, 12. 400 FAiR6ANK8 N.E. INTERCEP OA •PHASE I 17°.Q 0 37.8654:25 320 CORDOVA NORTH FILL INDUSTRIAL PARK 700.0e0 3L:0.123 398 CORDCVA SOUTH FILL SUR AND WATER 361.080 38.916.0 390 9 41V. CASCADE CREEK SEWER 140.6.00 39.96LUS 385 NETCHt9AN 3ATe«AY BORO IUD BITE SUBDIVISION GarER 1, 079. sea 40, :46.85 385 BLAWOCK AIRPORT WATELLINE Men 40.446,295 375 CORDINA USS 900 - INMgM;;TCR-CRN Z 370 CORDOVA POWER CREEK INTERCEPTOR 4 L 060 41,486,285 370 FAIRBANKS WASTH'wATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE/EXPAN 3,3i0.000 44,716,m .�- • .�- ._._ . __ SION •, y—• •- (: IV_ RQ41 PENI. 9W MAN- `~—. CENTRAL PENINSLU MINERATION FACILITY !.!m.no , r8.226,2'd5 370 NOME WASTEWATER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 10 0.1a s1,4s6.22s 36Si 1ENAI� NORTH SPUR WATER AND Sc"WER IfPAOVEI s, 480.W St,B�.b,285 WILDWOOD TO CITY LIMITS �38 KEYA11 EAST KOMI M= WERCEPTOA-VALHAL'J1 K 11686.288 53.542,2 IOHTS sr"E4 t?'PROVE.VIENTS 350' X CHIKAN PUBL:C MLITIEB CAlr&A%%A WE 'REATVEV PLANT 415.810 53.93.38. 345 JL%VU WEST WMENHOLL VALLEY INTERCEPIC9 04a 1, 962. 332 •5.3c0. 327 i 3�5 SOLDOTWI K-BEACH ROAD tAM, VAIN :.YTERTIE 0.39 z4a MINES YOLKS ROAD SANITARY VA4 rO. Z-107 '65.2e8 !b.3:0. �►87 W %GRrw WE 16, SEWAGE 'BEAT► EV EXPA X1 1.425.200 57.135.467 3*3 SC:O.:kA "NIV, DRIVE WATE? AD .Ew:R eX'E.tiS:CNS sya SCtDG"{A EA8' WOU'r-S'E;:IZ MY TO SE ;AVeR. 325. me is.9r. Sm i SECI7!+7 28 WATE9 *:x + 340 %UEt C0011 :OCDs SEWAR 14a0. M So. 4a7.:37 KA1tE aATER AND WER - W18L:i.:fi :8.a.e W.43..'a1 CAS 33a CCRuva SK: SILL SE49 vtv+ :X':.vstal 3:1 :s?1EAU %0" 3u1LMs 3ESERVOIR 999.t80 5:.:':.aal 338 "job ■CNT«NA CMK 2iS"RVO:4 622.:a0 62.:34. 7:7 3:0 -vAu Z;r .ALLE( q501)OI9 1.812.°,tt0 63.::e7.:M 323 E4t4NSIC4 W.H0 6..07.zM ' :J►£Aii `ART!+ :'JI;SLSS '4:y�1::S 2, a;5.22+0 6S. W-- , eS :."1F.Ay +Es' S:u!,':3L D:r 4:5UT:.N �=- •ray .�., "CL.,-.N XW, �; E; s:3'7:11- 1re.2ee E r a. ------ -....... - . FY 86 S"i.TE SAHITATICN PROJECT PRIORITY LIST 11/09/84 f'*,',VAL SCORE MUNICIPALITY PROJECT NAM RMINB - AOEC CLWWTIVE TOTAL . Zv 3a SOLOOTNA 1.0 M8 RESERVOIR AND FOOTHILLS TRANSNISS 0,069 68,307,207 ION MAIN 320 ANOOON CITY WATER STORAGE TANK 208.000 68,:07,207 326 KETCHIMN PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER TANK RELOCATION, PUMP STATION AND 247.800 68,754.297 TRANSNISSION LINE MI NORTH LOPE BOROUGH BARROW SEWAGE OISP08AL/WATER DISTRIBUTIO 5,000.000 73,754,807 N I 315 Awcom ELEVATED wra STORAGE TANK 75.000 73 8e9 207 f 313 PAM WAS criATER TREATMENT FACILITIES EXPAASID 19800.1 0 74,829.207 I V 315 4MER OCEOY 0411E MrrR LINE M.,me 75.134,207 315 HONER NEST rViq WATER a SEM LINFA 637.590 75, 771, 797 318, _CDROCVA MUST314. ;ARK PHASE I::C ScwER 266.200 � 76.837,737 3�10��S.E. VALHALLA l+EI3'e S WATE3 IMPROVEMTS 300.020 76,337,737 3a0 .'LiwE1MJ XAWS 1«ig 2 QND 3 DISTR:SLTI:N 850.90 77,187,787 38'0 :rwu :ES' VALLEY IAOI+STRIAL OISTR:BUTIM 372.800 77,09787 300 J`dNm VAM l91RPA O:S'RIBUT:U 37,Y00 77,596,717 :.LV X ISMAN 4,10-ME BAY 0I97,2I86,TICN 1,193.500 780790.287 �300 4f`:AI rENK&LA 301M %INIL3- IK LANDFILL 150."0 78,940.287 23s %A:: r:`;IS M-16Y TWO LAMERAL SEAERS 175. Z00 79, I IL 207 295 4wwil ++l SANITARY LAND m 6w. m 79, 75, 207 295 mg Lear. .A-S --CF MAN 79, 939.097 Jo 295 96.0 80.83S.777 -iflV- AY-a.A 4M F -Mort, Ext z%s: 98.0 E0.:34. 8r37 ON c30 Mirf:N CATER AND 3:,;ci ::g Ei1•s.:3I:V 84.456 90.2:3.247 { M. 474K ni %54 ;S/ wu ww ; 44 Erna 2.000. m 82.2:3.247 X, %EVIIA 41-91 :f.9 -r:"Z3 2.no. M 94.21.9.247 W. •.CyE A:svlri* 4,0MI•"! E 0ASSM44 Vt. 7'M 85.'.93.762 '• .9r Wr; %C.s =:.�,% �='r: _ /=!+s 7GR.r'E VA:", 237. O M.427.'E2 t =G:"+Fi!v"s w:" %:i aTR"ee' �w L: • ? :.32t.t¢t a6 y+ '- v .?C ..OZ f :�Z .L.P. .-� iEr �^:�• �.n 9�.Mr •�Q ,ro .. rr•r+f:�� :%.'o... r,.r...E320 .z Ma ';:..r . eaM 6'�E.Ca - : ., :._,'EY•'a AUE .E .A MZE Mae 97.:;3 7:a • 32C.KZ 9T.8B8..e2 72 7AL-E"s1 r _EZTy -..: 1XV =:3 _o:=ox Zfs7v 45d.ia M:_ -62 K ZME :`= - --• �'" w =� :.w: - :'m: ?%:� �Aa sc':'.5::', +;2.t�ta 3d.o,-c.+:: wi �`L ��t•:� r;:'i ':? :'.Lr:!!:.lti '•.«r.$ :.t::.7.D �!Z - ..•.�=:b.........rr'%.+.'.'w r'*E '-:�D-t:!'EEN: E -1 ::.;:r.:. 12r.4teE 6 r t [e[ f i 1 l ' ` 2 ''. FY 66 614% MECT PRIORITY L;ST 11/09/84 TOTAL ME MUNICIPALITY PROJECT NAME FUNDING - ADEC CL11MUlATIVE TOTAL 24$ dCDIMd WASTEWATER TiEATlI�IT PLANT MODIFICATIGI�S 250.000 90,26.918 ` a4a MCMER DANVIEW 6ATV L:VE 72,000 98.628, e4a NENAt j KENAi SPUR .ATER & SUR BORE TC SCU?w.4 y0.000 92.678.9 1) ST POR71CM OF SECT:"jN 36 ...: , M KENAi PEY:NSL'1.A MOM NEW SPECIAL SOL:3 WASTE SITE 2'a'a� WHOM 220 CMAK wM�,T1:TY :ACI.YEiATCR 20,000 .3.348,9.8 2:3 SAN", 3O:%T SCAT MRSCR/DOCK CATER AND SE��R 216.205 9..163.223 2t8 se.:01NA AIRPORT IMTERMTOR SEWER 948. M 92.113.2a3 220 Ja;CEZ SANITARY LANDFILL-eDUI'.MENT SHED 38.w 92.:43.223 ! 2:&AA+. WATE3 foul S 3930 in 9P.339..23 � I.ATE3 SUPPLY IMPROMMENTS 2.:75.eta 94.713.223 611010 DRIVE WATER AND S-cWeR 133, me 94.96,M F.28 A ;:4A kl9 :: ;7:::713 MiLis STAEer NAIV E1ITnSICN 32.-•a 94.878.773 d80 ET;,40% ;M X : 1;715 N11RD AVEXE :PST WATER 31,t00 94.3i5.?73 aM "LCEZ 1".D 10 LA%DF:.: C:CSJRE '2. �00 94.168.273 _ .35 XI�3 COVE 6CV PA4B09/. WATER AND SP„CR 400.U8 95,368,273 :3S 5:+t:C.':A SEWER SL:'A :%C:XRATCR 1,81..2tA _- 96,383.273 i3S iw 3:s all 40A3 ;ELL !SOUSE TELMSTRY 37.IN 96,420,773 :RACY/FAA .AN740Y MIA C r`•s:::3 /93.22S %616,898 , SPUR Se;.=.R ?C3e 4T ILIAMNA ROAD 25.Z00 96.641,898 i M 3:61.1 % :.2 r RES-1-14Y :R AM) SRLAI+'A-wa MNSr:S3 981.350 97,622. ' .-t�� s F--A LAKE :-.*- :%C!i 'RA!;S■ISS:C`: 644.400 Q Q ` ' 8. • :eo -f:AB;v ,.. 9 �My -;ik AGE; INTER ,,.STR:BU',C�+ 42S.200 98.69:44-, :-3 SW:,X'/ ,W..:_l STo.M -*x 125.1aa go. 8:s,s46 3E •.:.1'E c : 6A-.a SUPPLY 776.2:0 99,2.738 atai: 99.:32.798 F CITY OF KENAI 412d4a" "0 FIDALQO MN, MMU 9MI TOMMONB M- 7US J 1 i 1 March 26. 1985 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council FROMs Beautification Committee SUBJECTS Recommendation of "Request for Proposals" for Landscaoina Master Plan for Downtown Area At the regular meeting of the Committee on March 26th. eight RFP's were reviewed. The Committee made a motion to recommend to the Council the Kasprisin Design Group. A copy of the minutes of that meeting. detailing the decision and the motion are attached. Janet Loper Secretary Submitted at the reauest of Vice Chairwoman Nelson I: h 1' KENAI BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 26. 1985 Kenai City Hall Tim Wisniewski. Chairman I. ROLL CALL Presents Carter. Nelson. Salina. Sheldon Absent: Routh. Wieniewski (both excused) Also Presents Councilwoman Bailie. Parks & Rec Director McGillivray 2. AGENDA APPROVAL Since the oniv item on the agenda is the review of the RFP's no other items were added 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of 1985 �^ 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Make America Beautiful The Committee reviewed the booklets submitted by the contest people. The deadline for submittal is April let. therefore the City should be hearing soon after that date whether or not the City has won. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Review Reauest for Proposals The Committee reviewed 8 proposals submitted by: Centrum: Kasprisin Design Group: Bill Kluge do Assoc.: Kramer. Chin. & Nava: Land Design North: Jeffrey Otteson: Pays Design. Inc.. and Trvck. Nvman b Haves. Vice Chairwoman Nelson expressed her feeling that it would be looical to have one contractor who is already on the job and familiar with Kenai's needs to continue with a project similar in nature such as Kasprisin Design Group. Parks 6 Rec Director McGillvrav indicate a favorable response to Kasprisin stating that the project appeared to be more geared to the kind of staff available to carry out the projects: the Committee agreed. Councilwoman Bailie expressed her a �. - 1 - - - - -_ iL- v ; r i BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 26. 1905 Psoe 2 aocreciation of the resoonse of Mr. Kasorisin stating that he was very i much in touch with the needs of Kenai and further was very budget conscious which is what the Committee and certainly the City needs. ! MOTIONS Committee Member Carter moved to recommend to the Kenai City Council, Kasorisin Design Group with the inclusion of both options, seconded by Committee Member Salina,. - VOTES Motion gassed by unanimous consent 7. PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION REPORT None at this time. B. COMMITTEE QUESTIONS & COMMENTS 9. ADJOURNMENT 1 - e� kft I l PARKS, VISITOR, IN l� 1� f� i 1 F [_ L f. ■ __ •. __-..___.. T.._. _...jupipm RECREATION AND DUSTRRiY' EXPERIENCE kasprisin design group ��F�t�:�,:u�,�:;•��dp.�r �„�:r�r�rl,-r;�,:,r..:,�:;�.:•r ��.e>��er 9,810 R.�'yrf1l1,91i1J Ton Wagoner Mayor, city of Kenai 110 a Pidalgo %1046 AK, 49611 20 MArah, 1989 arohitaato and Ulbaa lanlors) sot fairvigy we, ©, 6"00, v ek, go= Dear Mayor Wapnorl Attached pleaes find a letter proposal for the DMITOWN IAMMOADP, MMFR VWI for the city of Kenai# We ago presently preparing a davelupsent plan for the Old Tounsits to Kenai and are beaosine familiar with the city, particularly the downtown area. Our quatifiaatione for this type of proJeat include downtown design and re- vitalization plans, and landscape designs for such .o®unities as Mainee, Juneau (Auks day). Metahikan, and Weaiila, Alaska, to 088, we Vera awarded VSHOT IMCG in the Nlesouta, Montana Downtown Rivorfront Corridor Deeigo Comps- Ittiont dealin1 with open space daeignl in 1964, we received a Merit Award from the American planning Association for our tlainse Downtown Design and Waterfront perk (now eonetruated)I and in 1981, we "GoOod tha Outstanding Ashiry ON Award for the port Townsend, 'Washington Downtown Maater plan, t am including a phased proposal for your review, based on an understanding of your budget constralats, Ws certainl'/ appreciate the ooppportunity to submit this proposal and can A7'*Z we cotomportant project, cis Daliy eailin, city "ounell station sselaou 0 Is a a , V - I �f lazlli i A PROPOSAL FOR THE KENAI DOWNTOWN LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN Nalertc Ohfnrscivet 0 an tituscrata4 @its plan shoving to dsvelop a waiter plan tar the downtown area landscape alsmancaj of Kasai, Alaska which Will depict lsadocaps design for ohs Commercial concert 2) a recommended phaoing,plan$ Y To illustrate the landscape dselga and eahamstla details in two and thros dimansione, appropriate 9) two and throe dimensional sketches depicting design character, taste. for City spprovAla and preliminary cost cad msterisls$ satlmaiiea$ 4) a preliminary cost ostimats by phase to Indicate construction phasing end weans to toad which will be useful a a planning tool= �� and soGompliah tfaah phases fi S) recotzmadations on various ways to achlove Asereanh anA yrsd�wttat the Nestor plan$ • i the RN ass has doveloptd a un4us and highly illustrative mothod of deolgn, s lent 6) o Nester plan document, printed and , bound, approval, end MPH prissntatioa, ysssd on the tact outiiaiag the recommendations. that ws ere presently conducting 91p develop- g=t ' was plan toy the original townie$ plan and reesarablas conditions within the downtown to ardor to reduce the altyte costs, the area, we have baooms familiar with tho needs Keopriain Ooeign Group will lategrata the '+ is downtown for beautification in new and sits surveys in with the Original Townsits study. •• .� existing developconte, as veil ss siong city in addition, KDtf has in-house printing cape - I ri`ht-of-way, We understand the pride of blUties which can result in savings for the ' - Denst residents in choir community and the final production of the document (or manual). V dairs to reflect that pride is the downtown$ We will design the final product to be simple. a wall ate the friendly but attest desire co �. stratebt forward and highly graphic with only aoepsc4 with foidotns for the growing visitor dollar. nscossitatins a need to vieually supporting text captions end cost atimata, +� •i improve the Ksnsl commercial sree and old No have attached examples os similar downtown towns landscape produced for your review. KOO will ' $b will talk with the Mayor, interested city use or exated those products for Kant. Council and city planning ao®lasion satmbore .. ,, • and proporey owners to doco mina the type of design Character doslrod for the city. Oesed latervtove An chase and the design experience of no with other aiailar projects, we will prepare landscape aahematics for city rovirv, Following this review we viti finalize the mosar plan eomplato with the following t 1 Ad 9 OPTIONS/ COSTS } Task/Product Ones Hourly Bates of Personnel Illustrated site Plan Bon Kaepriein .......................860/hour I (Design and Graphics) ............. 01,700.00 Architect/Urban Planner i _... Task/Product Twos Paul Hedrick ..................... 848/hour Recommenced Phasing PLaa .............. 400.00 Urban Designer i , Task/Product Threat Colin laden ...................... 825/hour Sketches .............................. 960.00 Technician Taek/Product Yours Preliminary Cost Estimate By Phase..... 480.00 -° Lives I ' rod Mil lmpiemsatation ReeO®endaCLOG$......... 460.00 : f � Tuk Product B s I i tar Plea Document 0 25 bound copies .................. 300.00 o Layout, typing ................... 960.00 Total Cost $5,290.00 Three costs are based on "piggybacking" • the review periods on to Ron Kasprisin's Townsite trips. Any additional trips will be billed at 0125 per trip for travel costs and 6480 per day for Ron's time. i I I[ Option 2 •� to order to provide the City of Kenai with a r more detailed description of Landscape materials Including where they can be purchased. installation techniques and stsndards. their maintenance sad upkeep, and personnel scessarios to reduce costs. the following section is added to Option is f sdds I i l _.l. Expand Task/Products Three, four and Five to include a preliminary SoeeLfications breakdown of matatial availability, 1 purchasa options/locations. installation techniques. maintenance and upkeep, and personed options. These items ' will Lure=& the costs by S3.800.00 t The total cost of options 1 and 2. assuming - -- i no extra trips. will be 99,080.00 I 'Y—' { r Alaskan- anment of R— Public Services olvlslonYe (Names of Chance end Contests of Skill � Calendar Year Junes .AlaakaN81111geo0 PERMIT APPLICATItj%nual "'Ar'1��� FEES: =20.00 due with application:1% of entire net proceeds due will Financial Statement. Please read the Instructions before completing this a 1. Name of Organization 4A. NEW APPLICATION �--- Kenai Peninsula Board of REALTORSID Number of Years Organization Has Been in Existence in Alaska: Mailing Address P.O. Box 4082 The following must be submitted with this application: ❑ Current Alaska membership list (must have at least City, State, Zip Code Kenai Alaska 99611 25members), ❑ Certified true copy of articles of Incorporation or, If not 2. lype of Organization. (Check the appropriate box. Refer to AS 05.15.210 and 15 AAC 105.010-300 for definitions.) Incorporated, copy of bylaws and national and state ❑ Municipality ❑ Police or Fire Department and Company charters; O Copy of IRS certificate of tax exemption Issued to non. ❑ Civic or Service profit organizations, If applicable. ❑ Religious ❑ Dog Mushers' Association Name and Mailing Address of National Organization (if applicable) ❑ Charitable ❑ Pbutical ❑ Fraternal Non•profltlirade Association ❑ Educational ❑ Fishing Derby Association 48. RENEWAL APPLICATION ❑ Veterans ❑ Outboard Motor ❑ Labor Association Most Recent Year Permit Number.. 84-605 Issued 1984 The following must be submitted with this application: 3. Organized as: (Check the appropriate box.) ❑ Corporation M Association O Partnership ❑ Current Alaska membership list (must have at least ❑ Firm ❑ Company 25 members); ❑ Copy of amendments to bylaws, if any. 6. Local Officers (must be current, bona fide members In good standing) NAME TITLE DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER Ron Moore President 262-5862 Linda Schirmers President Elect 262-7315 Florence Walker Vice President 283-3571 Ron_Gibbens Secretary 262-3102 Kristin Lambert Treasurer 262-9081 8. Types of (Names to be Conducted. List types of games by common name if other than those listed. See AS 05.15.180, AS 05.15.210; 15AAC 105.110-180. ❑ a. Bingo (NOTE: Bingo XX b. Raffles B Lotteries ❑ a Dog Mushers' Contests O It. Rain Classics games must not be held more than 0 occasions ❑ c. Pull -tabs 13 f. Fish Derbies O I. Other (Please list) In a calendar month with no more then 35 ❑ d. Ice Classics D g. Contests of Skill games per session or serles of games.) THE SPACE BELOW IS RESERVED FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY. Date of Receipt Permit Number: Date of Issue: Financial Statement: 0 Yes 0 No NOTICE: OWING ACTIVITIES MAY NOT BE CONDUCTED UNTIL THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. i 9beLltRrK9raq I - I A _ 1 DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS The entire proceeds of the games shall be devoted to and disbursed In accordance with 18 AAC 105.280 Use of Dedlcated Net Proceeds. (a) The dedicated net proceeds given to a qualified organization may not be used to pay any person for services rendered In connec• tion with the activities from which the funds were derived. Detailed records of all disbursements must be kept for later audit review. These must be kept with the other accounting records for a period of three years. (b) Disbursements for the promotion of the welfare and well-being of the membership means that a member may receive assistance in the form of various charitable donations, which have been approved by the organisation's board of directors, Charitable projects which an organization may sponsor Include education grants, training assistance or job counseling, food baskets, medical or health-care assistance, charitable functions and dinners for the community, etc. The qualifications to receive the charitable donations must Include a requirement that all members of the organization within the com- munity may qualify and receive the assistance. These payments may not be devoted to organizational parties, dinners or benefits, picnics, or social functions limited to members and their families. (c) Permiltees may not erect, buy or tease buildings or land for their organization with the net proceeds unless these buildings are: (1) used exclusively for educational, civic, public, or religious pur- poses (such as hospitals, churches, schools, government buildings, or community centers); or (2) turned over to an appropriate nonprofit organization which qualifies as a tax-exempt organization under the Internal Revenue Code, Section 601(CN3), or to a local, state or federal government. 7. In the space below, state the Specific purposes for which the entire net proceeds are to be devoted and In what manner. The net proceeds will be devoted to the operating expenses of the Kenai Peninsula Board of REALTORS® and for charitable community donations. S. E Receipts AMOVW BY OUNCM DATE C;TY CLERK 9A. Person in charge of games (Must be a bona fide and active member of permittee organization) NOTE: The member in charge shall be present during the conduct of each of the specified activities stated on the permit. An alternate may be designated to conduct the authorized activities during the absence of the member In charge. NAME MAILING ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER (Primary) Kristin Lambert 113 Smith Way,Soldodtna,Ak.99669 262-9081 (Alternate) Bob Nath 11127 Kenai Spur Hwy.,Kenai,Ak.99611 283-4888 98. Has either person listed In 9A above ever been convicted of a felony or gambling misdemeanor? ❑ Yes X] No 9C. Will either person listed In 9A above receive compensation of any kind from the receipts of the ❑ Yes S] No gaming activities? 10. Signature of7ixoOfficers Required We certify under penalty of perjury that to the best of our knowledge and belief all the information on this application. including any attachments. Is true, correct and complete. We understand that any false statement made on this application is punishable by law. We further certify that we have delivered two copies of this application to the nearest city or borough offic9 for review. 1'0�. -i Reau, lit /k .' '. - -+ - - - - - - L. 4__ NOTICE: ANY FALSE STATEMENT MADE ON THIS APPLICATION IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW. � eae.3eecrrus., Alaeka oepallmonl of Hovonuo Oemae of Chance and Contests of 8k111 Publlo Services Division ,y, Calendar Yesr Juneau, Alaska PERMIT APPLICATIO lD,ppiJQ6 ��:� Juneau, Al9ehe 998t1-0100 4� FEES: S20.00 due with eppliootlon:11% of entire not proceeds due wit %;QW. uel Financlal Statement. Please read the lnotruatlone belore completlnp this appl 1. Name of Organization 4A. NEW APPLICATION 5 Kenai Peninsula Home Builders Assoc. Number of Years Organization Mae Been in Existence In Alaska: Mailing Address P.O. BOX 1753 The following must be submitted with this application: ❑ Current Alaska membership list (must have at least City, State, ZIP Code Kenai. Alaska 99611 25members); O Certified true copy of articles of Incorporation or, If not 2. lypa of Organization. (Check the appropriate box. Refer to AS 05.15.210 and 15 AAC 105.010-.100 for definitions.) Incorporated, copy of bylaws and national and state ❑ Municipality O Police or Fire Department chanters; O Copy of IRS certificate of tax exemption Issued to non- and Company 0 Civic or Service profit organizations, If applicable. ❑ Religious ❑ Dog Mushers' Association Name and Mailing Address of National Organization (If applicable) ❑ Charitable O Political ❑ Fraternal X$ Non•profltltade Association ❑ Educational O Fishing Derby Association 49. RENEWALAPPLICATION ❑ Veterans ❑ Outboard Motor O Labor Association Most Recent Year Permit Number. Issued The following must be submitted with this application: 3. Organized as: (Check the appropriate box.) ❑ Corporation X91 Association O Partnership ❑ Current Alaska membership fist (must have at least ❑ Finn ❑Deny 25 members); ❑ Copy of amendments to bylaws, If any. 5. Local Officers(muet be current, bons fide members In good standing) NAME TITLE DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER Mark Passe President 283-3529 Clint Hall Vice President 283-7012 Chris Keller Treasurer 283-5773 Sandy Benson Secretary 262-9081 Woodie Cole Board Member 283-7817 5. Types of Games to be Conducted. Llet types of games by common name if other than those listed. See AS 0515.1S0, AS 05,15.210, 15 AAC 1011110-.160. ❑ a. Bingo (NOTE: Bingo 13 IL Raffles & lotteries ❑ a Dog MushoW Contests O h, Rain Classics games must not be held more than 9 occasions Cl o. Pull -tabs O f. Fish Derbies ❑ 1. Other Please list) In a calendar month with no more than 35 ❑ d. Ice Classics ❑ g. Contests of Skill games per session or series of games.) THE SPACE BELOW IS RESERVED FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY. Date of Receipt Permit Number. Date of Issue: Financial Statement: D Yea O No NOTICE: GAMING ACTIVITIES MAY NOT BE CONDUCTED UNTIL THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, asealae,,.aro�► '� J DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS The entire proceeds of the games shell be devoted to and disbursed In accordance with 15 AAC 105.280 Use of Dedicated Net Proceeds. (a) The dedicated net proceeds given to a qualified organization may not be used to pay any person for services rendered in connec- tion with the activities from which the funds were derived. Detailed records of all disbursements must be kept for later audit review. These must be kept with the other accounting records for a period of three years. (b) Disbursements for the promotion of the welfare and well-being of the membership means that a member may receive assistance In the form of various charitable donations, which have been approved by the organizations board of directors. Charitable projects which an organization may sponsor include education grants, training assistance or job counseling, food baskets, medical or health-care assistance, charitable functions and dinners for the community, eta The qualifications to receive the charitable donations must Include a requirement that all members of the organization within the com- munity may qualify and receive the assistance. These payments may not be devoted to organizational parties, dinners or benefits, picnics, or social functions limited to members and their families. (a) Permittees may not erect, buy or tease buildings or land for their organization with the net proceeds unless these buildings are: (1) used exclusively for educational, civic, public, or religious pur- poses (ouch as hospitals, churches, schools, government buildings, or community centers); or (2) turned over to an appropriate nonprofit organization which qualifies as a tax-exempt organization under the Internal Revenue Code, Section 501(C)(3), or to a local, state or federal government. 7. In the space below, elate the specifto purposes for which the entire net proceeds are to be devoted and in what manner. Devoted to use by Kenai Peninsula Home Builders Association for advertising, education, pormotional, community donations and scholarship funds. APPROVED BY COUNCL -3-'Pb' 7 DATE crt CLERK 8. Estimated Yearly Gross Receipts y - S- S' $ 5,000.00 9A. Person in charge of games (Must be a bona fide and active member of permitlee organization) NOrE: The member in charge shall be present during the conduct of each of the specified activities stated on the permit. An alternate may be designated to conduct the authorized activities during the absence of the member in charge. NAME MAILING ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER (Primary) Chris Keller 110 S. Willow Street,#106,Kenai, Ak.99611 283-5773 (Alternate) Clint Hall P.O. Box 2829, Kenai, Alaska 99611 283-7012 90. Has either person listed In 9A above ever been convicted of a felony or gambling misdemeanor? 0 Yes XX No 9C. Will either person listed In 9A above receive compensation of any kind from the receipts of the O Yes XX No gaming activities? 10. Signature of two Officers Required We certify under penalty of perjury that to the best of our knowledge and ballet all the information on this application, including any attachments. Is true, correct and complete. We understand that any false statement made on this application is punishable by law. We further certify that we have delivered two copies of this application to the nearest cliv or borouah office for ravlevw 048e3 Back ois4) NOTICE: ANY FALSE STATEMENT MADE ON THIS IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW. --- --- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - k- z- w (; -1� CITY OF KENAI „aded1�ei4"„ MQ FIDAM MAI, AM U W11 ULBPNON8283- H March 27, 1985 TOs Keith Kornelis, Director of Public Works FROMs Jack La Shot, City Engineer �91 SUBJECT: East Alisk Street, North Highbush Lane, Swires Drive South Highbush Lane and Bumblebee Street Due to recent problems associated with the referenced project, I am writing this memo to document certain events and bring the City Council up to date with respect to project status. ( Recently, S & S Engineers, Inc., who the City Council awarded the design work to, has apparently gone out of business locally and sold their other operations. When the design work was nearly complete, we advertised the project for bid assuming the design contract was properly carried out. As a matter of standard policy, the plans and specifications were mailed to the utility companies. At this time, we discovered a major conflict with the drainage system and a large transmission line belonging to HEA. During design, the engineer did not properly coordinate the design with affected utilities es stipulated in the design contract. Learning of the utility problem, the bid was immediately postponed until April 109 1985 and has again been delayed until April 16, 1985 to resolve the problems. In the interim, Mr. Alan Jones, formerly of S & S Engineers, has been revising the design work and preparing an addendum to the contract documents in an attempt to complete the engineer's committment. At the request of the City Attorney, I have written to Mr. Dick Smith, Manager i of S & S Engineers (or whoever they are), in Anchorage to ascertain the status of the firm and to get written confirmation of their representative for the project. To this date, I have received no response. On March 26, 1985, Sam Kaser of HEA, Bill Nagengast of Schmit, Smith & Rush (consultants of HEA), Alan Jones, and I met to discuss the utility conflicts. The major problem is that L. - 1 - - ---- - -- - - --- - -- - - - ---- - - - ---- -- - --- ---- - -- - -Ak- a. drainage ditches would remove coil from around the poles of the transmission line serving the entire Kenai even. After explaining several alternatives that we thought would help the situation, HEA suggested to simply support the poles with 20 foot "stubs." By doing this, the poles could remain in the ditch section and the City costa would be reduced through lose reworking of the drainage system. Also, should the City request the relocation of this line, the time delay and potential coots to the City (if the City does pay for future relocation costs) would be substantial. HEA plans to rebuild and move this line within the next three to five years as a part of their overall system improvement plans. The costs to the City for support of the poles is expected to be about $109000 and would be included as a bid item within the construction bid. HEA would actually do the work, per their requirements, and be reimbursed by our contractor. in my opinion, this is the beat and least expensive solution for all concerned. All other routine relocations would be handled in the same manner as past projecte, according to Sam Kaser of HEA. The effect of the project on other utilities is unclear at this time. Due to the changes that have taken place within S h S Engineers and the problems during design, i would recommend seeking another firm for the inspection and surveying phase of this project. We ' could go back to the original proposal and ask the firm which was (' recommended by Public Works at that time for this service. At the next City Council meeting, the following two items need input from Council in order to proceed. 1) Does the City wish to pay for support of the power line poles? !...:. 2) Should Public Works seek another firm for inspection and surveying? _ JL/jet Attachments r' ) A- Suggested bys Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE TO S & S ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT ENTITLED: SOUTH HIGHBUSH, BUMBLEBEE, EAST ALIAK, SWIRES, AND HIGHBUSH ROAD FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $25,560. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received proposals from the following firms s Taeac, Inc. Mike Tauriainen, P. E. Wince-Corthell-Bryson Wm. J. Nelson & Associates S & S Engineers, Inc. WHEREAS, the Public Works Department feels that it is in the best interest of the City of Kenai to award this project to Taeac, Inc. WHEREAS, sufficient funds are appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA, that a contract be awarded for engineering design services to S & S Engineers, Inc. for the design of the project entitleds South Highbush, Bumblebee, East Aliak, Swires, and Highbush Roads for a not -to -exceed amount of $25,560. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of July, 1984. ON WAGONER,Lj YOR AfTEESTs �et Wheian, City Clerk r MEMO TO: FROM: RE s DATES CITY OF KENAI „vd edla" *J 4"" �. 'l10 F OMW KBNAI. M ASM M11 TU MON112U- 630 578i1..:1 Keith Kornelie, Pubiic Works Director -•- - • -••••• • Jack LaShot, City Engineer Engineering Proposals Received July 12 - "South Highbush, Bumblebee, East Alisk, Swires, and Highbush Roads" July 13, 1984 The following firms submitted proposals for the referenced project. Firm Fee (Not -to -exceed) Project Construction Management (Est.) Wince-Corthell-Bryson $409200 $650000 Taesc, Inc. 29,244 63,692 Wm. J. Nelson & Assoc. 36,000 10% of construction S & S Engineers, Inc. 25,560 329080 Mike Teuriainen, P.E. 399885 60,000-80,000 The Soldotns branch office of S & S Engineers, Inc. submitted the lowest fee for design of this project. The City has not previously contracted with this firm for engineering services, however, they should be quite capable of performing the work. I would prefer, due to the large amount of work that Public Works is now doing, to reduce coordination by selecting a firm we work with frequently. Also, if S & S is chosen, it would not be reasonable to expect to negotiate a fee for construction administration near their estimated fee of $32,080. This is based on a 90-day construction schedule and 40 hour work week, which is not reasonable to expect. To properly inspect this project, we probably will need a budget of $60,000 or more. The Kenai firm of Trans -Alaska Engineering submitted a fee of $29,224 for design and their estimate of $63,692 for construction administration appears in line. Trans -Alaska has chosen to submit their proposal through their construction company (Taeac, Inc.) in order to provide E & 0 insurance in the amount of $1 million, per our requirements. This was done in order to be F - ' r ' ' . ` -~ - u .» ^ %0 ' | March 6, 1905 Homer 301ectrle Association, Ina. P.O. BOX 350 ■ SOLDOTNA. ALASKA 99669 ■ 262-SS31 MAR1985 RECEIVED ba W WL W, Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager City of Kenai no Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Res East Adak St., North Highbush lane, Swires Drive, South Highbush Lane, Bumble Bee Street Water, Sewer and Street IsWcovements - 1985. Dear Bills Romer Electric Association, Inc. (HEA) received a set of plans and specifications for the above referenced project about February 14, 1985. Please note that as far as records indicate, these plans and specifications are the first formal notice of this project which have been received. BEA's major concern with the plans and specifications is the proposed ditch r- which will border the streets involved in the project. As planned, the ditch location and profile will jeopardize the integrity of electrical service to the City of Kenai. Preliminary evaluation indicates that from 1 ft. to 5 ft. of soil will be removed at the bases of the transmission line poles serving the City of Kenai. BEA strongly recommends that the City of Kenai redesign the ditch system .to accommodate the power lines in their existing location. if IBA is required to relocate their lines, in particular the transmission line along East Aliak Street, the street project will have to be delayed for at least a year. 2his would be the minimum estimated time required to design and relocate existing facilities. The relocation of the transmission line would also be a very large expense for the City's contractor. (Section 90.15 in Project Manual - "Existing Utilities in Construction Zone). The City may wish to table this construction project as HEA has started converting the old electrical system serving Kenai to their standard distribution voltage of 25 W. the City and SPA could plan together to locate new transmission and distribution facilities so that conflict with street construction is minimized. Conversion in this area is expected to take place between 1980 and 1990. Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager City of Kenai, ` March 6, 1985 Page 2 ' In addition to the major conflict with the ditches, there are several existing underground taps which do not appear on the drawings. Drawings indicating i locations of these taps will, be sent to the City Ehgineer as soon as they are , conplete. Please advise as to the City's wishes concerning this matter. Sincerely, Eugene R. Collins 4r Manager, Ridgeway District cos Mr. Keith Kornelis, City of Kenai - 1 Mr. Jack Ushot, City of Kenai + Mr. Bill Negengast, Sdm►it, Smith & Rush /f SCHMIT, SMITH & RUSH .-...._._PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING ENGMRS r ' - 1677 C Street Anchorage. Alaska 99501 Phone OM 338bW4 eA�s; u c. March 11, 1985 KQN PUeN� WORKS DE►T. �] anl. C�nb —Q Ant Cone. 1E118O Vitt i Sw. Mr. Jack LaShot, City Engi a p go --a wtr s w'w J se►eet� Wty , City of Kenai t] Sinai). • Shop i ptQ,,a,�' 210 Fidalgo •`~� •-••- --- STP Kenai, Alaska 99611 °� q sip U� 14MOL NOr h DaW M02 Re: AK5 Kenai - East Aliak St., North Highbush Ln . , Phone pol)W24461 Swires Dr., South Highbush In., and Bumblebee St. Sewer, and Street Improvements. MUD?Water, NO= VAXVrA am PO Box1802 Dear Jack, Phone (7O1)M 4461 Accompanying this letter is a set of S&S Engineers, ; etoMOMMaGUN Inc., drawings for the above referenced project on which I , have indicated in red Homer Electric Association, Ines. NorMolmondtdtnp 4xosswresaeet overhead and underground power lines. ... Pnonec�rn)26saos6 Following is a listing of power and street construction tuoKr�wAi+io� conflicts: ' PO. Box 2=6 Phm'(406)65MOo ...., East Aliak Street 1. Existing overhead transmission/distribution line MUM in conflict with proposed ditch from Sta. 2+50 to HonsoOnv 41+50. Pno (nMMI 2. Sta. 11+70 - Relocate guy and anchor in conflict , with new fire hydrant. At11ieU►"= 3. Sta. 11+90 - Lower buried secondary. 1577C UM Phonetv07)3386304 4. Sta. 18+55 - Brace transmission line pole when fire hydrant is installed. Move fire hydrant if possible. Phon9(40b) 9t 5• Sta. 20+5 - Lower buried secondary. 6. Sta. 22+45 to 23+20 - Relocate underground second- ary. 7. Sta. 30+60 - Lower underground primary.. 8. Sta. 33+5 - Lower underground primary. -- -._ Swires Drive - 1. Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 7+85 - Relocate existing 14.4 kV line that is in conflict with proposed sani- tary sewer. Highbush Lane 1. Sta. 3+ 95 to Sta. 20+60 - Existing overheat: power line poles in conflict with proposed ditch. Mr Ci Ma v ' Pa wi so th e 0 . Jack LaShot. City Engineer ty of Kenai rch 119 1985 ge -2- Bumblee Street 1. Sta. 3+75 - Possible ditch and pole conflict. 2. Sta. 4+90 to 7+30 - Relocate underground secondary. Please advise as to any changes that'the City of Kenai 11 be making concerning the ditch design on this project that cost estimates for above work can be prepared for City's contractor. Any correspondence concerning this matter should be rected to Sam Kaser or the undersigned at Homer Electric sociation, Inc. in Soldotna, _SlAcer ly, Wm. F. Nagengast Mr. Sam Kaser, Homer Electric Association, Inc. Mr. Gene Collins, Homer Electric Associations, Inc. =r bid I VI nb111A1 MOFIDALQO KENAI,ALASKA 096" TELEPHONE283.7536 ��5' �. March 18, 1985 T. R. Smith S & S Engineers, Inc. 7125 Old Seward Hwy. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Res South Highbush, Bumblebee, E. Aliak, Swires and Highbush Roads Dear Mr. Smiths In reviewing your insurance binder for the referenced project, I have found that the professional liability portion of the policy wee to expire September 1, 1984. We assume this was renewed as called for within the design service contract. Please send a binder and a copy of the professional liability insurance policy covering S & S Engineers, Inc. for this project. This letter also serves as notice of a potential future claim against S & S Engineere, Inc. if design services are found to be unsatisfactory. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, 41d 0;&f jlw-e Jack Lashot, City Engineer cc: Homestate Insurance Brokers of Alaska, Inc. (P.O. Box 872210 Wasilla, Alaska 99687) Tim Rogers, City Attorney Q CITY OF KENAI "Od (?ap" 4 4"0'0 210 R OALao KENA1. ALASKA 0/N1 T@LBPNON8283.MIS T.R. Smith, P.E., L.S. •T -- S & S Engineers, Inc. 7125 Old Seward Hwy. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Dear Mr. Smiths S & S Engineers, Inc. has a contract for engineering design services for the referenced project. There remains several commitments associated with that contract for which S & S Engineers must have representation. Mr Alan Jones has stated that he will provide these services, but, we understand that he is no longer with the firm. The City of Kenai must have written confirmation of their representation for their project and the status of S & S Engineers, Inc. This project is tentatively scheduled to bid March 26, therefore it is important that we receive a prompt reply. It appears that some redesign may be needed on this project to avoid major utility conflicts. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Please contact me if there are any questions. Sincerely, Pa WAtflzee Jack LaShot City Engineer ccs Tim Rogers JL/rh March 14, 1985 ��1 1 I CITY OF KENAI Vd espd4l */ 4" S"O lqu"o NBNAI. ALASKA owl TMPMDNBM-7680 March 29, 1985 TOs Council FROMs Tom Wagoner Mayor SUBJECTS Mayor's Report On March 25th I was in attendance at the State of Alaska Conference of Mayors, which met in Juneau. The main topic of discussion was funding of Revenue Sharing and Municipal Assistance at the State level. It is the feeling at this time that State Revenue Sharing will be funded at the same level as last year. Also, the current feeling at the Legislative level is that Municipal Assistance will be funded at last year's level. While this is not at the Governor's recommended level, which was $66.2 Million, it would hold Municipal Assistance at $81.3 Million. The fear of the Conference of Mayors and some legislators is that when the Senate and House come down to the finalization of the budget, and find that they still have several million dollars left in reductions, Municipal Assistance will be one of the larger pots of money in the budget and easiest to out. I would recommend that the Administration prepare a resolution (and if possible I will try to have the resolution in front of you for your consideration on April 3) so that you might forward a resolution supporting the Governor's recommended level to our legislative delegation. One additional item discussed at this meeting is the fact that it now appears that Federal Revenue Sharing will be at 50% of last year's level. During this visit to Juneau, it is still evident that no one is prepared to discuss nor has the necessary information to discuss any funding of projects such as Kenai Community Center and the proposed pioneer home. With Council concurrence I would like to appoint Walter Them to Kenai's Beautification Committee, Mr. Them has an excellent i I is I4 .. -: 3 n background in agriculture and various forms of plants pertaining to Alaska's cold weather climate. He would be a valuable asset to the City of Kenai while serving on this committee. The next item I would like to discuss is the landscaping ordinance. While I am committed to the Beautification program for the City of Kenai I have several reservations so to the currently drafted landscaping ordinance. Those are as followes 1) I do not feel that full perimeter landscaping is necessary to attain our goal in bringing about better beautification of new business ventures in the City of Kenai. The only time 1 could see perimeter landscaping being necessary is in the case of Mr. Lowry's 8-plexes built and needing to create a transitional zone between residential and commercial areas* further, our ordinances currently allow commercial construction on a zero lot line basis. Therefore, the landscaping ordinance would be in conflict with our own zoning code. 2) 1 would like a 7-member landscaping committee appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by Council. This committee should not be restricted as set out in the draft ordinance. It is the duty of the Mayor and the Council to see that the proper membership of each committee and/or commission established in the City of Kenai has as well qualified members as can be found from the public at large. If membership is restricted to certain professions I fear in the long run that it would hamper the ability to have a functioning committee. 3) 1 would request that a specific time period be set for•final review and approval by this committee. This time period should coincide with the average procedure of a concept lease being presented to Planning & Zoning and recommended from Planning & Zoning to Council or receiving finalized approval by Planning do Zoning if it is not necessary to be reviewed by Council. This should give the committee an average of at least 2 weeks to review the landscaping plane and recommend changes and/or give their approval. If the landscaping committee cannot react in this period of time then the landscaping plan should be approved as presented. 4) 1 feel the maximum percentages of square feet in any development to be set aside for landscaping should be stated as followes Builder and/or developer should do landscaping in conformance with the Kenai ordinances in an amount not to exceed 5% of the gross footage of the property being developed. If the developer and/or contractor can provide an acceptable plan that is less than the 5% the landscaping committee should not create any unnecessary hardships to the builder and/or developer. The only other item I would like to cover with Council at this time is that of the proposal being submitted by Dick Morgan to build a municipal golf course on City property. 1 would like to urge Council's approval of the concept as proposed by Mr. Morgan and request that they give their full support to a project of this nature. This is an excellent example of what could be accomplished with a little cooperation between municipal !f , I governments and private industry. This proposed development will l'. enhance the lifestyle of many citizens in the City of Kenai, spur further development in the residential areas surrounding this project, increase City population, and bring more commerce to the City of Kenai. This commerce would be generated through golf tournaments, additional visitors coming into the area to use a muncipal golf course, and sales tax generation. j a In closing I would only state that golf as a sport can be enjoyed by all ages, or as some people put it, almost from the cradle to the grave. I would urge Council's support for the project. TW:jw j j� f Y� ILI CITY OF KENAI- "Od eapdd 4 4" 210 ROAM MAI, ALA Q IMI "WHON11 Z!8. 7686 G March 260 1985 TOs Council FROMs Janet Whelan RA City Clerk REs Clerks' Seminar March 17 to 22 TOPICSs Modern Management and the Clerk - Cato do Assoc, Kirkland, WA Update on Notary Public Laws - Lt. Gov McAlpine Update on APOC Laws - State APOC Office The Legislative Process - Legislative Information Office Legislative Update - Scott Burgess, Municipal League Office Title 29 - Lee Sharp, City Attorney, Juneau Contract Assessing - Mike Worley, State Assessor Alaska to year 2000 - Clive Thomas, UAJ State and Federal Revenue Sharing - ChRA jw S 9 � N' f KENAI ADVISORY LIBRARY COMMISSION March 12. 1985 Kenai Citv Hall Linda Swarner. Chairwoman 1. ROLL CALL Presents All Commissioners Present Notes Commissioner Turner will be absent from April meetino.. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda was approved as submitted 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 15. 1985 The minutes were approved as submitted by Unanimous Consent 5. DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. Director out of town 6. OLD BUSINESS a. Library Addition Update The bonding papers have not been sent to the Director of Public Works for the new library construction. 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Policies of Library Commission These policies were formulated a a ,joint meeting of the Library Board and Library Commission in Februerv. 1985. MOTIONs Commissioner Turner moved adoption of policies for the Library that is Identified as "exhibit A", seconded by Commissioner Heus. MOTIONS Commissioner Turner moved to table the motion until the next meeting, seconded by Commissioner Carson. r fr . LIBRARY COMMISSION March 12. 1985 Paoe 2 b. Goals of Library Commission MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to accept the Goals with the following 4 additions, seconded by Commissioner (none indicated in either written document or tape) VOTES Motion passed by unanimous consent 1. Computer Useage 2. Frequency of interlibrary loans 3. Increase number of patrons (increased through 2-way communications 4. Support from outside groups, i.e.. Chamber of Commerce, fundraisers. adopt a library MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to amend the original motion to include the following items which will be included with the goals of the Library Commission, with consent of second VOTES Motion passed with unanimous consent 1. Public recognition awareness of volunteers and paid staff 2. Examine feasibility of user fees or deposits on large equipment or items such as typewriters, etc. 3. Access to video cassette with headphones for patrons (also checkout) 4. Awareness of materials, services available - PR local media 5. Information hotline (call in) 6. Increase programs - great books discussions toys; art c. Work Session Scheduled Note to remind Commission that there will be a ,joint work session with Council on March 20th at 500 p.m. 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS 6 QUESTIONS 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. OWN Janet Loper Secretary lf...N.....«44-6-,,., 9 00 Y f 0 KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH SPECIAL ASSEMBLY MEETING /(// ra FEBRUARY 12, 1985t 700 P.M. �, /!F/1�8s n BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING w SOLDOTNA, ALASKA A. CALL TO ORDER 4P��'�EObGZa2�L� The Special Meeting was called to order by Pros. Marilyn ck at 700 p.m. in order to discuss purchase of the proposed computer. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. INVOCATION Aesemblymember Carey gave the invocation. D. ROLL CALL PRESENTS Assemblymembers Nash, Valli, Mullen; Crawford, Carey, Moore Glick, Dimmick, McGaban, Dale, Johnson, Stephens, Vaudois Mayor Thompson, Adm. Asst. Beet, Finance Director Barton. Assessor Thomas, Data Processing Manager Owen, Borough Clerk Brindley ABSENTS Aseemblymembers Keene, Sewall, Skogetad E. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS (a) I 8 -1212 "Authorizing the Mayor to Proceed with s ure se of a Burroughs A9F Computer with Peripherals. Training and Conversion Coate of $1.6 Million and Hiring of Two Additional Programmer Analysts" (Mayor) Mayor Thompson presented the administration's position in regard to division of responsibility between the assembly and the administration. The administration is to decide 1) whether a new computer is needed, 2) what size, i.e. capacity is needed, and 3) what type of manufacture is needed. The assembly is to decide to fund or not to fund. He said that the Borough administration has decided after much thought and study that it would be wise to stay with the same manufacturer - Burroughs. Continuation is based on not having to retrain personnel, present software would be compatible with the new Burroughs equipment, and changing manufacturers would be much more expensive. Burroughs Corp. representatives Jerry Baitey, branch marketing managers Larry Hartman, marketing managers and Joyce Waite, technical service manager ware introduced by Mr. Best. Also introduced were Darrell Darrel consulting service director and 8risn Fisher. consulting servLes manager of Price Waterhouse. Clay Neeley of the schoot district data processing was also present. Mark Owen, data processing director, stated the primary objective of his department is to provide adequate resources to do the job for a period of st least five years.Hee ssid a primary thing needed for any such project is properly organized and adequate number of people to be involved. Specific roles and responsibilities of the Individuals center around a project manager (Owen), a steering committee and as implementation committee. Steering committee is responsible for determining strategic objectives or policies and general directions. to The Implementation committee is responsible for g get the Job done. He advised in the Spring of 1983 review was begun regard g installation of larger systems. He said the hardware implementation was well on the way and the new eyetem would be ready for delivery in April, if approved. Mrs. McGahan asked if the new system were currently being manufactured without approval. Mr. Oven indicated there had been a letter of intent to purchase which doesn't obligate the -1- i 9 � KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1985 Borough. He also affirmed that the two additional positions requested to implement would become permanent. Mr. Nash inquired whether the sales tax collection system would be finished in March 1985, which Mr. Owen confirmed and that it would run on the existing or proposed system. He indicated that there were five major programs and all would best be modified for a new system. Mr. Best stated the job was being done, but not efficiently. Mr. Johnson. asked if at the time of inception, any consideration was given to the possibility of other hardware or manufacturers. Mr. Oven advised a specific proposal process was not. gone through but information regarding other vendors and systems was researched. Mrs. Valli asked if the Borough administration planned to use the school district's long range plan as part of the combined effort of school district and Borough. Mayor Thompson indicated they did. Mr. Neely said there are state standards for school districts. Mr. Barton indicated the Borough uses national standards. He indicated there would be different programs for each. Mr. Mullen asked about the capacity of the system. Mr. Owen said the current workload is twice what the present system was designed to handle. He also advised that cost of an additional Burroughs 1900 syystem would be $350,000 - $500,000. Lease cost would be 812-0,000 to 8130,000 per year. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Keeley if there was any reason the school district would limit consideration to Burroughs equipment. Mr. Seeley indicated consideration of others could be done, however, reasons for staying with Burroughs were the same as mentioned previously. He, too, indicated the system was overloaded. Mr. Johnson asked what the advantage of one A-9 unit was as opposed to three 1900 units. Mr. Keeley advised the A-9 was much faster than three 1900 units. Mr. Owen said three 9-2000 would cost about $900,000 with a lower performance than A-9 costing around $900,000 with greater storage capacity. Mr. Carey asked if there would be a trade-in or credit for the current system. Mr. Owen indicated one system was leased and one was owned which if sold would generate about $35.000 to $40 000 of the original purchase price of approximately $90.000. He said the B-1000 was being phased -out. The leased system costs about 09,000 per month. Mr. Nash asked what major system additions, other than the school district. have been accomplished in the past two or three years. Mr. Owen stated that other than the new financial package, pprobabiq nothing very terribly significant. Mr. Nash further asked bow much of an increase of the total workload represents the addition of the school district's work. Mr. Owen stated that per most recent figures the school district represents about 302 of the load on the two ma;41nes or two-thirds of one machine. Mr. Owen stated that with any 9-1000 system there to an overhead factor -- approximately 252 of capacity for programming. Mrs. Dimmick followed up asking Mr. Owen what the overhead factor would be for the new proposed system. Mr. Owen advised that he would have to estimate it as being very close to the same range. A Burroughs representative stated that there would be a reduction in the overhead. Mr. Nash asked Mr. Seeley what the cost of a package would be on a coommpparable system. Mr. Neeiey advised somewhere between $100.000 - $150.000 to purchase another package with a different vendor. To convert within a Burroughs' system would cost 925,000. - 2 - n .. 4 I t i �f _ I t KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1985 Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Neelay if the school administration would pull all their information out of the existing system and put it into a new 1900 system, what would be accomplished. Mr. Neeley said that the 1900 system would not take care of the information -- currently two schools. He said two more schools are being put on this year, seven next year and continue until all are on the system. Jane Hammond, school board president, expressed the concerns of the school board regarding the future of the data processing evotem. increased demands on the current system, has prevented access during "regular" hours so individuals have been coming in early hours. She stated that it didn't seem cost-effective to have two systems when one larger one would do. Dr. Fred Pomeroy, Supt. of Schools, stated when he came to the school district there was a long-range plan developed. Three yyoars ago, the Mayor and Dr. Pomeroy signed a common use agreement. He stated that he felt the school district had pretty well laid out where they wanted to go in the next five years. He stated for the school district to be on target, there will have to be more capacity. Mr. Carey asked Dr. Pomeroy 1) if it would reduce the number of teachers needed to have report cards done on the computer system as opposed to the current method, 2) does it add efficiency to train teachers so that they can work a computer, and 3) how does it add efficiency. Dr. Pomeroy indicated that it would not reduce the number of teachers, however, it would increase efficiency because a teacher currently has to add information per report card while under the new system information is compiled on one onset. He also stated that he ease the has system as enabling librarians or teachers to spend move time with students rather than with bookkeeping chores. Mr. Carey posed the question, if there to no conversion to the new system looking at the cost breakdown it seemed there would be a rather large amount of money to be spent on shifting from one system to the other. He then asked if there would still be a need for the two new analysts. Mr. Owen indicated they would be needed to address some of the outstanding difficulties with current programs. if there were no conversion and no improvement to the existing system, there would be no conversion costs. Mr. Dale asked if there were systems between the B-1000 and the A-9 that would not require conversion but would increase capacity with existing software programs. Mr. Owen said there wasn't really anything in between. Mr. Dale then stated that he had been advised by the Burroughs representative there were no other A-9e in the State of Alaska and asked if Mr. Owens had checked other cities or boroughs regarding their types of equipment. Mr. Owen said they had spoke with other cities, county governments, boroughs, etc. that had installed the A-9 equipment. He said the vast majority of the information received about other boroughs in state was gleaned from other department heads visits to those installations. Mr. Johnson asked whether all transactions go through a single CPU (central processing unit) on the A-9 series. Mr. Owen indicated the A-9 represents a cluster of CPUs each one dedicated to a specific function. Mr. Owen said the existing system has two CPUss the A-9 provides higher speed CPUs and more of them all packaged in one container. Mr. Owen said that while they have adequate storage now by adding units, however more processor time is required in adding thin storage. Mr. Johnson then asked if a B-1900 were added to the school district for $300,000 (adding essentially 2 CPUs) wouldn't this speed up the operation. Mr. Owen said while this sounds good in theory there was largely a technical design constraint. The 910000 are not designed for multiple machines to share storage unites the A9 to. There was considerable discussion regarding the advisability of investing in•a system which may be outmoded by the end of five vears. - 3 - L KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MUTING, FEBRUARY 12, 1985 Mr. Mullen asked Mr. Owen if he considered the network system in the Finance Dept. consisting of 825s and 15 megabytes of storage as one function low -volume. Mr. Owen said he considered them to be in a slightly higher category. The system is a satellite networking system to the main frame, and Mr. Mullen asked what was wrong with this concept of satellites. Mr. Owen stated that in concept there was nothing particularly wrong with it, but what has happened industry -aide is installation is done three ways -- 1) Gatellitse exclusively. 2) or combination of satellites and main frames, or 3) centralization of everything with a main frame only. The data processing department is trying to take a balanced approach. Mrs. Dimmick asked Mr. Neeley what was the provision for security of student records. Mr. Seeley said security was built into the system, terminals were in counselors offices which are locked. The data system is shut-off when the staff isn't present. Mr. Carey asked Mr. Neeley how many time had the computers been down at the high school. Mr. Seeley responded a ballpark figure of a dozen times. Discussion continued regarding security of school records. Mr. Nash asked Mr. Owen to clarify the conversion of programs. Mr. Oren said there are several different conversion approaches, 1) one for one conversion - making minor changes to current programs to adapt to new equipment (i.e., Honeywell to Burroughs in pset years), 2) buy all now packages (changing manufacturers), 3) take those things sitting on existing equipment and continue to operate and in the process to properly document and develop new copies for new machines. in response to Mr. Nash's query regarding how can the department rely on this history when current programs are not necessarily going to be moved across. Mr. Owen cited track record. The large systems file equipment has been in place since 1963 and sine that time there hasn't to his knowledge been one of the major users who has bad to go through a major software conversion to install a larger capacity processor. The "history" is other users, not the data processing department's. Mr. Sash next questioned Mr. Seely about the school district packet, specifically the disadvantages/advantages section -- "controlling their own destiny" Mr. Neely responded this concern was based on school district delays due to Borough priority processing, although this has lessened. Mr. Week asked what position the school district would be in if the Borough does not buy an A-9F. Mr. Neely said there would be two ovtions at that point - 1) wait and see what the Borough does (baiting school district plans) or 2) the school district considering their own system -- stiff entailing conversion. Mrs. Dimmiek asked Mr. Keeley if indeed the school district had to get its own computer, would he perceive that they would automatAcaliv look to the Burroughs brand or put out requests for proposals to all, companies. Mr. Nseley stated to a certain extant the district was locked in. Other vendors can always be considered, but costs go up very quickly when considering this. Mr. Moore asked about the vulnerability of being locked into one vendor. Mr. Nealey confirmed this was a possibility, however, this would be true to a certain extent with any vendor. Mr. Moore asked if my moaies expended by the school district for a system would be eligible for reimbursement by the state. Mr. Barton said just the opposite was true. They are required to spend 55% of their money in the classroom. if they go over that, the state takes the money away from thaw. Mr. Dale asked who owns and operates A9Fs in the Pacific Northwest and how long the systems have been on the market. He asked if the 86700 series was considered part of the large system family. Joyce Waite gave a history of the University of Washington's experience. Mr. Dale asked about conversion of existing software as compared to software designed to use with the A9F system. The Burroughs - 4 - KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING. FEBRUARY 12, 1985 representative said they compare very favorably. He said that IPM who provides the finance department package is compatible with OF. Mr. Crawford. asked about computer eyetem ratings for throughput capacity -- the IDC scale. He said the A3 Series was rated 30 through 60, and A9 as 60 through 120. He asked where the A9F falls between the 60 - 120. He was advised the OF was a 120, at the top of the A9 series. but not the large systems. Mr. Crawford questioned figures for annual maintenance and the fact there was "extra" maintenance charge for the first two months. The two months is the balance of the fiscal year. The other figure is for annual maintenance per fiscal year. This maintenance is for continuous upgrade of software. Mr. Moore asked about relative capacity of three Bl000a as compared to an A97. Joyce Waite said one of the points achieved in terms of going to a more powerful box (A9F) as opposed to adding multiples (91000s) is there is less duplication of overhead. It was pointed out by the Burroughs rep the A9F would not only allow the Borough to let the in-house users with terminal responss to get their daily work done but also the capability to develop applications, which are currently backlogged about two and one-half years. Mr. Carey asked if the school district had its own computer, would would the efficiency problem be speeded up. The response was that it would be marginal. Mr. Nash referred to the Price Waterhouse January 23 letter, page 1. The Price Waterhouse representative stated they did concur that this was a correct decision to upgrade with the OF. He stated that since the report of the 17th and 23rd, they had significant actions taken towards their recommendations relating to planning. Significant action being awareness, effort, commitment and preparation for the implementation plan beginning with an applications plan. Mr. Nash asked the representatives if there were any of these plane to be comptoted prior to approval of this system. The Price Waterhouse rep indicated the decision could be made right nows the implementation plan is underway substantively. He indicated that there are a couple items that cannot be obtained on the current machines, but there has been effort put forth to acquire additional objective information as opposed to subjective. information reviewed in the report. The probability of success has definitely been raised. Mr. Dorral reviewed some of the arose of improvement as to esstq of icwconversiondan(thicifulssre rourrceantipated 50mass-days (technical analysts Burroughs 6 Borough personnel) for implementation of a detailed plan formerly low to medium now medium expected to become a highs 2) Wiii the UP improve on-line response time for users -- formerly low to medium now medium anticipated becoming a high (Dorret explained the Burroughs Corp. had made a performance bond commitment upon the delivery of the system.) Mr. Johnson posed a question in reference to the performance bond delivery - delivery operational)q or just the hardware. Jerry Bailey of Burroughs responded this would be on delivery of the hardware and the software operatingg system that runs on the computer -- not the application programs. wher"s to guarantee delivery date that Burroughs made for the computer bardware so that with all plans t into piece training of Borough personnel, ate. -- based on mplamentation of these plans they guaranteed (bonded) a certain delivery time (on or before April 1). Mr. Dale asked what the bond had to do with will the system "up -time" and reliability improve with the OF and upgrade of the probability of success from low to medium. Mr. Hartman repended that as far as the bond was concerned, it was a misunderstanding on what the bond was really covering. Mr. Hartman said improvement on on-line response time improved from medium -to -high to high -medium to high. -5- ' a KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING FEBRUARY 12 1985 r , In regard to "up-time"from low -to -medium to medium -to -high -- the Burroughs rep indicated that the Borough had installed a environmentally -controlled computer room with high capacity air conditioning, power filter and uainterruptible power systems which increases "up -time". Along with installation of the A98 a spare kit is installed so that if there are any failures in the system the are replaced reducing repair time. Mrs. Dimmick advised Mr. f Barts orrel that this had been done prior to Price Waterhouse's study. Mr. Dorrel indicated that he agreed but the OF has more "up -time". i Mr. Moore asked Mr. Dorrel of Price Waterhouse if Burroughs Corp. was ' going in weir ip effirmaueiveime" as they had indicated. Mr. Dorrel i led t i Mrs. Dimmick asked Mr. Dorrel if they were. going to do this now because there has-been a bit move fuss than expected or had his opinion of Burrough's operating procedure improved. Mr. Dorrel indicated the former. Ito stated that in general Burroughs Corp. record is very good. j Mr. Dale asked what Price Waterhouse had meant when it had said that the OF presented new and different problems. Mr. Dorrel said that it was a new piece of hardware and required new training. Mr. Carey inquired as to why training was a "new and different" - I problem. He echoed Mr. Moore's concern that Mr. Dorrel of Price I( Waterhouse was maintaining objectivity in recommendation of decisions without listening to Burroughs Corp. first, then making a decision. i ' Mr. Dorval advised new training referred to Burroughs personnel training on a new system. Mr. Nash addressed Section I - Open Items of the January 17th report. He addressed the first item regarding obtaining a commitment from • Burroughs to determine and confirm, based on adequate utilization _ statistics, the targeted service levels resulting from the family migration and whether this was being provided now or still open. Mr. Bailey commented that it was obviously a big commitment for Burroughs to decide install an OF in Soldotne, Alaska. He stated that when I the current system goes down, the field engineere come from Anchorage. If they find the they Seattle who then can't problem call send engineers from there. On the OF this 'procedure is not ; ` necessary because a procedure is used called remote diagnostics. This means if the OF goes down and the Borough places a call for field service, the engineer comes on -site. If he can't dispose the t problem quickly, the plant where the machine has been made physically dial in a modum to the machine and take control of the machine. This results in solution of the problem in hours as opposed to a day with someone physically on -site, thus resulting in more "up -time". i The next item addressed was in regard to the user demand for - I• information with present resources - still low -to -medium unless theme is so installation of an A97. Mr. Moore asked how his opinion •�; would change if there was an additional B-1900 series was added. Mr. Dorval said that it would not change much because the long-range user — -- - - needs would not be met and short-term needs would be on two to three months. -------- Mr. Carey asked if Price Waterhouse did their own research to check Burroughs' research and did the draw their own conclusions to check their conclusions or were they just taking Burroughs' knowledge. Mr. Dorsal responded that in arriving at these conclusions. Price j Waterhouse has had more then ten partners and senior managers from . iNew York, Atlanta, Detroit and Anchorage review Borough documentation f and their comments. j - 6 - L. - - 11 - -- - - - - — - - - _ _ --- L ---- -- — — —_ _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - __ - --__ KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING, PEBRUARY 12, 1985 Mr. Moore asked if during preliminary work with the Borough did Price Waterhouse request information From the Borough that they subsequently refused to supply. Mr. Dorrel said Borough personnel bent over backwards to supply information. He said they were provided thirteen documents including a study from July of 1983, subsequently they requested three additional documents which they received very rapidly. Mr. Best advised that during steering committee meeting going.back in history, some of the data that Price Waterhouse would have liked to had simply wasn't available. However, years ago this data hadn't been collected. (performance statistics on machine utilization) The next area addressed was in regard to LINC (software) capabilities. Mr. Dorrel advised that theprobability of success was still low -to -medium until an application is developed by Borough staff and the LINC system is utilized. It was stated that it is a steering committee function to make the decision as to how application is performed. An application has been developed in the school district. Short-term user needs being met with present resources, based on present resources, would stay at low -to -medium. Long-range (3-5 year plan) user needs rated as low probability of success with comment that information needs cannot be met merely by acquiring additional hardware. Mr. Dorrel further commented that user needs are also satisfied by the functions of the software. The hardware provides performance and quickness within the machine. The software drives how the user does their job. The question of personnel was addressed at this point. Mr. Dorrel was asked if personnel had been considered in their ratings. He indicated that the Borough was short of resources definitely, but was moving in the right direction by acquiring analysts and additional user personnel. Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Dorrel if he would make the recommendation that there be a data processing manager -- one person in charge. Mr. Dorrel agreed that should be the case and that was in place now with Mr. Owen. Kr. Johnson further inquired if Mr. Oven's position was a staff level position with an equal basis. Mr. Dorrel advised that he believed it was a different level and that Mr. Oven reported to Mr. Best. Mr. Best at this time stated that data processing was within the Mayor's department and Mr. Owen's position was that of a division head within the Borough. A division head might be compared with a Borough engineer, a planner, etc. Mrs. Dimmick asked if the existing situation needed to be continued In order to assure that all users would have access and all other problems be dealt with or should another personnel situation be considered. Mr. Dorrel said that the right people are in place right now, the steering committee structure is appropriate, the responsibility rests with Mr. Oven and with additional resources (at least the two recommended by administration) the direction was right. He did state that with continued growth more personnel would be advisable. Mr. Moore continued the line of questioning asking if they saw the need in the data processing section for a professional data processing manager with management skills who can relate to users and make a uses -friendly data processing department. Mr. replied "yes". Mr. Carey asked, which long-range user needs cannot be met by acquiring additional hardware. Mr. Dorrel replied that any of the long-range needs. -I- 0 KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING. FEBRUARY 12, 1985 Mr. Dale asked what actions needed to be taken by the Borough to raise the "Low" on long-range user -needs to a "High" probability of success. Mr. Dowel responded detailed planning and definition of the user needs. He emphasized that the planning process is ongoing. The user needs have been defined or isolated at this point. Mrs. Dimmick asked if the detailed planning could or could not be done with the present staff. Mr. Dowel said that the long-range plan could do it and it would take a significant amount of data processing staff time, interfering with ongoing activities. He stated that they did have the expertise, but it would be time consuming. Mr. Dale asked with the addition of the two recommended data processing people what would the probability of success be in meeting Long-range user needs. Mr. Dowel that even more important than the addition of two or more people was bringing all parties involved together to a eoncensus, which was occurring at this meeting. He indicated that this alone brings the probability of success from "Low" to "Medium". Additional personnel, detailed plans and resource commitments will bring the rating straight up. Mr. Best commented in administration analysis, two additional personnel would help things get started and as things come online more personnel would be needed. Also, past of the contract with Burroughs would put their in-house key personnel have for one year after the piece of equipment (A91) is delivered. Additional =Us athert�need per second be addressed in the normal budget process Mrs. Dimmick advised that the concern of the Assembly was whether the personnel needs were being addressed now or nor. and "looking at it later" generates the question, how much later. Mr. Best said that the planning process and implementation is an ongoing thing. As part of the ongoing process, administration would be coming before the Assembly with requests as needs arise. Currently, administration believe two personnel will help the program get started. Administration wants to address whether the personnel will be long -tare► employees, contract employees, or just short-term People to do specific Lima during the process. Mrs. Diamick expressed the feeling that planning needs should have been addressed prior to the decision to purchase a computer. Mr. Moore asked price Waterhouse personmel regarding Mr. Owen's technical capabilities. Mr. Darrel said that while this was not in the scope of what they were en aged to do, he felt Mr. Owen was very msaigequali level trim encourage rraged sadding to the technical skills at a Mrs. Valli retorted to the statement that these was no warranty on the equipment. She asked if when the equipment is delivered it doesn't work, what happens. The Burroughs rep advised that they warranty that the machine will work and as past of the implementation on the #yet= and the implementation plan, plant software experts would be at the Borough to run the system to see that it does work. Nothing is contractual until the system works. The annual maintenance contract keeps the hardware serviceable from the time the equipment is turned over to the Borough. Mr. Carey asked that if in diagnosing a problem. Burroughs personnel would have access to information within the equipment from the E1 Monts, California plant. Joyce Waite responded that remote diagnostic is initiated by Borough data processing personnel. They can than provide user codes to protect the data or if these is something extremely critical and sensitive, remove the information from the system. She said that usually user code and passwords would be sufficient and then the password can be changed. She stated that -8- KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1985 user codes and passwords cannot be overridden. She also that j internally user codes and passwords can be used for each program I maintaining the security from within department to department. ASSEMBLYMEMBER MC GAHM MOVED TO AMEND RES. 85-12, DELETE SECT. 2 ADD NEW SECTION 2, "That a b llot be included i the next arai electLon for an adv eor vo e o enee or 'decorate a on whether to ceea VIEW Bese the Srru Fr c or er saon n a eonvers on oa • wnzcn WIL& Boa e rox ma e -- -- em on o a fiscal a eu !i Mr. Nash asked administration how adversely they felt the Borough would be effected by leasing a 1900 for an additional year while the planning process continued toward the purchase of a larger system a year from now. Mr. Best said the normal process is to generally enter into a lease, espeeially'when the time element for use to unknown, and then there is generally a lesse/purchase portion to the contract. At the break even point, there is analysis of whether to purchase or continue the lease. He said the administration's opinion was that there needed to be a start on the A9F now before the Borough fails any further behind. It was their feeling that the delay of the A9F, would put the Borough behind 2 - 4 years. Mr. Crawford spoke against the Moore amendment as a "bandald" cost descry plus in another year the cost of the A9F could escalate President Dimmiek advised that as time had ran out for legislative action the amendments and resolution could be addressed at Tuesday's assembly meeting, February 19. Mr. Dale asked where the 1900 for school district use would physically be located. Mr. Best said there would have to be a cable reallignment, but there is currently a environmentally controlled room. Mr. Owen said that if another piece of equipment were added to the existing environmentally controlled room it would create a bottleneck when other equipment is added, it would be necessary to deimplement existing machinery to make room. Mrs. Waili asked about the existing backlog for computer input and suggested that if one -quarter of the $1.6 million were used for extra shifts could this be eliminated. Mr. Best advised that they were nearly there now -- the computer is sunning anywhere from 16 to 18 hours per day, sometimes seven days a week. Mr. Johnson asked about the earlier statement that the data roeessingg department was two and one-half years behind in lementing new programs because of manhour and machine times. He s• d what these progrom4 pertained to and on a criticality factor how high were they. Mr. Best said that it was true for some programs. The decision as to what programand what priorities go into the machine and what's done is decided by the Data Processing Steering Committee. - 9 . i KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1989 Mr. Mooro said that it was his understanding that money could only be appropriated by ordinance. However, in Res. 85-12, the Assembly was being asked to approve the purchase of a million dollar computer and .6 million in other costs. Mr. Barton advised that within Rea. 85-12, there is 0100,000 approved to transfer from other equipment to data processing equipment which has already been appropriated. The purpose of specifying the $1.6 million, is so the 'Veembly would be aware that this will be coming up for appropriation next year. Mr. Nash asked Mr. Fisher if in his opinion there would be any benefit to leasing a 1900 for one year, while ton range plans are being made over the next year. Mr. Fisher responded that it would be a short-term (2 or 3 month) advantage. Discussion on Resolution 85-12 ended at this point, for continuation at the Feb. 19 assembly meeting. Mr. Carey explained to the Assembly that he had put two copies of resolutions -- 1) one addressed to the Local Affairs Committee dealing with reapportionment of the Assembly, and 2) one directing the Waste Commission to give priority to a new alto for special waste disposal. The mating was adjourned at approximately 121IS a.m. Date aogt+otrod er._ te' 1oaS Mrsl 'T Dlwcxo Y Morcup c IF If ESTIMATE CITY OF KENAI Project "' ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROJECT - 1984 am Polu0 WORKS DEPT. riW a►...._p n, aew, Contractor Southcentral Communications 4O PAYw. -- Ssr. Address P. 0. Box 2316 aw s i Soldotna, Alaska 99669 Project No. s• Phone (907) 262-9262 Period From to /3At. 4 fib ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT MOUNT TO DATE O1 Original contract amount $56,565.00'� OZ Net change by change orders O3 Adjusted contract amount to date T6 .5&5.G0 ANALYSIS OF WORK C0141PLETED ® Original contract work completed S4 r6 5, (t'q O5 Additions from change orders completed © Materials stored at close of period 0 Total earned0+0+ 6Os J �, 54,5. (to, r/ 8O Less retainage of percent 116VE % ALL Lt meSr.-m h(, h e ® Total earned less retainage( -O3 - ,'Sly, �'�'►P r - 1657,04 ✓ 0 Less amount of previous payments ��� 74C. 75- 1] Balance due this payment �tl, 824. S cc: Contractor Southcentral Communications Engineer _ IISCO ` Jill J�.l "44 COUXUL ME"" OF a«�-1� �.---.�ca, c d ox � � kY ores S k AN f P A Y ESTIMATE NO CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR Accatififts to the best at my knowledge Anal belief. Icurtify that all items and Amounts shown an the face of this Periodic Estimate • for Partial Payment are corrects that All work has been performed AnJ.'Ot material supplied in full accordance with she requiramongis of the reforanved Contract, Affai"of July authorized Javiassona, subagigugiona. alterations. and/or additions; chat she foregoing is a true and coffees qtAtemant of the contract account UP 90 4nJ ancluJing the last day of the patiuJ covered by this Periodic Hocimate; that no pass at the "Balance Due This Payment" ban boon received, and that the undersigned And his subcontractors have -(check a.;,�Complied with all she labor provision of said contract. b. Complied with All the labor provisions of sAiJ contract except in thascr instances where an honest dispute exists wish to- apeeg to jiAc. '.shot provisions. (if (b) to chocked, atrivairibe 1hrieffy nature of Maputo.) Ily SOUTHCENTRALMOMMUNIMIONS VASIgnst—we of Authorised Representative) 19-LL Title r tt% le CERTIFICATION OF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER I cattily that I have chocked And verified flit.- above And foregoing Periodic Estimate for Partial Payment; that go the beat of my knowletigg and belief it in % true Ana correct statement tit work performed and/or material supplied by the contractor; that all work end 'at material included in flit% Periudiv Efkcimite hag baton inqpi-ecad by in& And lot by my Jury authorized mprosentative of apisistafflit And that it h.s% been pt rsurm'.4 And "Of supplied in full -iccur.fineu with ruquirunivag;i of 9119 f9fdrOngo contract. And Chat partial psynlvnc Claimed And ruiluu,scuit by the contractor its correctly computed an the basis of work performed AnVor mace. suppfiaJ to data. Signed Air, L) - /-L 11SCOArrhitoce or endinut,f) Date PUS' PRE -PAYMENT CERTIFICATION BY FIELD ENGINEER Check INV* 01 P401filent curINJudi Z3 I have chocked this eqstimste the confr'sclet"i S.1141111110. it AnIoNjurs. lot Contract Payments, that notes and tcpojrt4 of my in, eci-jus or the poovet, oaf flee p,-roojic rs'Porc* -1-111AA !-v Abe itelostuct 'enisinvar. It s% my opinion chat tilt- ..casement or .11VCtiormVal Apt in M.Igg-re'llft tiUjj+vj it, .14xurltv, Illm flit: LitatrAegur is stlifturving the requitamLitts or thate0fiff-94:9, And that the cu"CfAcgor should N., Pji-ithuAmount requathurd Asovc. I certify thit all woork and or mAtvri.sl-. under chi, concr.oct he, I-veso jU.1-veteal by me And 14139 it IIA- 1`9911 I'Vt(WItIvol And 'Of oaj- PliLJ in iUll ACCOIJAUCC %&Rh tilt' WqUIWOR-119-1 4-S the 476-nit.wt. -He 11sco (Field Ensuivelf tuatep AppsoveJ ullover) % Y - oafE� rjUROQN! INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENT SERVICE...INB;w-' : - p ❑ BOON A8 P06alate 300 Airport Way�A Kenai, Alaska Wit �/' FILE NO. _ ►_S'Gl �i t Nlc+ , c; Q NO REPLY NAEOID (00283,4230 0108 Mackay. Suite 210, Anchorage, AK 02 Al `01 AfTL�Nf/ON __��K L/1_S/�C r F. (007) 662.4338 C AG �/, 'h�J eicM-c•� .. suerecs -. L-U._M/-' S L-ir► l �; �/:F ��Mi�c�=rig,✓ _STY h l� -A NssSAos ___-_.A5..:.014CU..sS v ON .,41-4 .._ .L UMP Jv-M-_WO1K c/V..7.;/r Cc Ma WPM/..C_-AV/Y/TDl1lNG OJ ce r . AJ _,(,pM L,[rT�, .._ D Y . L��T//hn T .3 'NCLCS¢p - -- W.-fGMr�[!`:T/- �,� -534ZI .��cMQ1�/pL Wo�K QN �E',►hST/NG E�IJ/i'M�*/YT -RE" 7Pe'� TCs _ 8, -'CvWlg WAY/11141:. 44/4PMING WiL6 HC R/4L60 T g1v ?ATf _.0_F.. 445,CcAw —n• _l,./�1.�t: -- n/vt� Mari•,�f,nc._.!�T._.lrS1���C�E1.. �Cs:__��cvs ��5°c,_ _... 8/ONED �J (;- I) 14: DATE OP REPLY -J SIONEo L *%.hTRADVnssa 7A1E1nDAffAT1/17L1 Dr•o/1�tr�r,er n .� A Program of the Fred Meyer Charitable Trust Highlights What is LIRN? The Library and Information Resources for the Northwest (LIRN) Program exists to tpptnt strategies for improving access to information :tt the Pacific Northwest (Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Ore - and Washington). Improved access to information .: it major contributor to educational and economic •it-velopment. LIRN will foster increased information Wcess in two ways: first, with a standardized subject-by- •ubject resource assessment resulting in a widely available latabase of both collection patterns and acquisition 1immitment patterns, and secondly, with demonstra- : tom projects of innovative information delivery. Both ac- -ivities support more effective access to information for everyone who uses libraries in the Pacific Northwest. What is the Assessment Project? The LIRN resource assessment effort consists of two distinct processes. One is a simplified one -page survey identifying specialized collections. The other is a stan- dardized process tailored to Pacific Northwest libraries, their collections, and users. With this process, each library will build a profile of its information resources — subject -by -subject— indicating collection levels or +trengths and acquisition plans. These profiles will be -ombined in a regional resources database that shows -:ollection levels for a given subject at all participating libraries. Why a Resource Assessment? A resource assessment will provide data for a computer -based -map" of resources in a single library, in clusters of libraries, as well as in all participating libraries. This map. in the form of a regional database, will provide: • an additional tool for managing collections in indi- vidual libraries • management information to assist with cooperative collection strategies and agreements • an additional source which library staff can use to assist patrons in locating subject collections What is Involved in the Assessment? First, the library administrator or management team identities one representative (two -three may he appro- priate for large libraries) to attend a two-day training n program. During the training program, the appropriate level of assessment detail will be discussed for each library. There are four progressively more detailed lev- els. At the most general level, there are 20DIVISI0NS. At the second level, the 20 DIVISIONS of level one are subdivided into another 200 SUBJECTS. At the third level, the 200 SUBJECTS are further divided into 500 FIELDS. And, at the most detailed level, the $00 FIELDS are expanded.to 5,000 TOPICS. Within a single library, some areas of collection may be assessed at the most general level, others at the most detailed, and others at appropriate levels in between. What Financial Support is There? Nearly all training and database expenses will be cov- ered by LIRN, that is, training in 1985, assessment forms, coordination of follow-up, travel and expenses for one person from each participating institution to attend training, and the development and delivery of a regional database. The major costs to the participating libraries will be staff time —two days of training and 25 E ' -75 hours per DIVISION, depending on the level of assessment detail chosen. The travel and expenses of second or third representatives in 1985 training sessions will be carried by the libraries unless prior arrange- ments are made with LIRN. Who Can Participate? Any public, aca- demic, or special library in the Pacific Northwest can participate. Participating libraries make these agreements: • to commit staff time to a two-day training program in the standardized assessment process. • to commit staff time to assess their own library collections • to report their assessment data to a central regional database. How to Participate? Any Pacific Northwest library can participate by sending in the participation form to the LIRN office. Trainings begin in April 1985 and repeat monthly thereafter. The sooner a library participation form is received by the LIRN office. the greater the chance for that library to he scheduled for an early training. I li® LIRN Resource Assessment Project How It Came to Be The Information Explosion. The pattern of accelerating growth in the production of all forms of recorded knowledge continues in the 1980s. The in. creasing importance of this knowledge is demonstrated by a parallel growth in the number of consumers and those professionals whose task it is to make information accessible. just as the complexity and importance of human knowledge has increased, so has its cost to the students, teachers, researchers, and citizens who are dependent upon it. More and more, community agen• ties, colleges. and corporations find themselves hard- pressed to fulfill their obligations to provide access to information in the face of reduced budget levels. New means to organize. retrieve, and deliver infor- mation are being developed continuously, but they are not enough. New methods of strategic planning for management of information resources —ways that look beyond this years budget and beyond individual institu- tional resources —are needed if we are to cope with the information requirements of the present and the future. Pacific Northwest Issues. In the Pacific Northwest we have fewer (three) large central research collections and lower levels of per capita spending for public libraries than any set of states with similar geog- r:tlti»• and population. Geography, distances. and dis• p erred populations of the region pose major problems of .u•ceas to information. Strong collections are widely rpread throughout the region and. despite progress with 41sioputer•based catalog services, they are, by and large, invisible. The LIRN Goal. Recognizing the special prob- lems of the Pacific Northwest, a tradition of library resource sharing, and the opportunities that the new technologies offer, the Fred Meyer Charitable Vust has established the Library and Information Resources for the Northwest (LIRN) Program. The LIRN goal is to assist in providing im- proved access to information in the Pacific Northwest, thereby enhancing educational and economic development. This is to be achieved by promoting the design of new ways of informa- tion acquisition. coordination, and delivery. To fulfill this goal LIRN has defined five objectives: • a survey which will result in a directory of spe- cialized resources in the region • a standard assessment process that identifies sub- ject patterns for information resources in the region 0 a regional database for analyzing and displaying or mapping subject patterns • a regional framework for cooperative collection management and inter -institutional agreements • the design of a regional approach to innovative, cost-effective information delivery A REGIONAL APPROACH TO LIBRARY RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND RESOURCE SHARING STAFF TRAINING r S i r COLLECTION ASSESSMENT r 1 REGIONAL DATABASE BUILDING DATABASE REPORTS COOPERATIVE PLA— N NO GREEMENTS ••~ er JUNE as 014 SO JAN N dun as ete a i 11�11�11f�{�� The Survey of Specialized Collections. A separate bill related activity in the resource assess- ment process is to identifv any special collections indi- vidual libraries may have. The LIRN Program will mail surveys to approximately 1000 libraries in the region in the spring of 19$5, The survey will be, one page, asking librarians to identify collections of books. tapes, films, photographs, or other materials they hold which may be distinctive, rare. or unusually important. For example, one library may have the personal papers of a federal cabinent member, while another might have a comput- erized file of economic data, and another a set of audio or video tape recordings. The completed survey forms will be used for a direc- tory of special collections in the region, This special collections directory will be sent to all libraries that respond to the survey and copies will be made available to others on request, It will be available in paper, micro- fiche. and diskette forms, The library staff commitment for this survey is ex- pected to be minimal with virtually no administrative time involved, The simplified survey can be completed without any special training, Assessment: A Flexible Approach. The LIRN program, with the advice of its Resource Assessment Group, has designed a flexible assessment approach to accommodate the wide range of libraries and information resources in the Pacific Northwest, Several levels of detail are possible and collections may he assessed at one or any combination of levels, Each level is an increasingly detailed breakdown of divisions base#,! on the Library of Congress classifications (Dewey conversions available) of 20 major DIVISIONS, For smaller, general collections the 20 DIVISIONlevel may be most appropriate, For those libraries with larger collections. the approximately 200 SUBJECTS of the next level may be more useful, Collections with further depth tnav Im best assessed using 500 FIELDS, And libraries with a comprehensive or research orientation may need the 1"ull aQfNl TOPICS, In some cases a rom- binalion ut these Itwels may be best -using the detailed TOPICS for one or two strnnq collection areas and the more general DIVISIONS or SUBJECTS for others, The Resource Assessment. The resource as- sessment process identifies where specific types of infor. �'R1 mation are located in the region. It includes information in all forms -print, audio, video, digital. etc, -as well as library information that is not cataloged and public information resources not in libraries. The process out- lined here is totally new in its regional scope, but is based on the experience of the National Collections Inventory Project, the University of California collec- tion analysis project, the State of Illinois inventory proj- ect, and the statewide assessment of collections under- way in Alaska. During the assessment, library staffs evaluate their collections according to standardized criteria, creating a clear picture of collection strengths in the region. sub- ject -by -subject. Quantitative measures, such as, shelflist counts and qualitative measures, such as, professional judgment, are combined to produce present collection leas! indicators. Libraries also produce acquisition commit- ment indicators summarizing the intended collecting level. The indicators, in the form of numerical ratings, are reported in a regional database that displays collection levels at one or More lihrsaru.a rnr ...;__ Firmearnw ASSESSMENT LEVELS EARTH SCIENCES 20 Divisions PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY GEOMORPHOLOGY HYDROLOGY 200 8ubleap OCEANOGRAPHY HUMANECOLOGY GEoLOGv General Periodicals Hlstory 600 Fields Specilla sed>raata Ragional Geology -omen! Rooml Gaotogy-United Ststa Regional Gootogy-Ca► eds -o - 5000 Topics RegioNl Geology-Amernc regions Mineralogy Petrology Soil Science-Gowel Sod surveys So►1 Clasd►aaron Sod Physics .Soil tllam►stry Sod bwenemievy I i i i� n Assessment: An Overview. For each DIM n SION, SUBJECT, FIELD or TOPIC chosen, library staff assign "collection level" and "acquisition commit- ment" indicators. The overall process includes these steps: • reviewing this document e deciding to participate in the assessment • assigning the staff • training the staff at LIRN-funded workshops • assessing the library collection based on common guidelines • recording the assessment results on standardized worksheets • reporting those results on standardized worksheets Assessment: Staffing. Staffing needs for the assessment vary according to the size of the collection and the level of detail at which the collection is to be assessed. While precise time data is not available, the experience of a number of libraries suggests that from 25 to 75 hours of staff time per DIVISION will be needed for those assessing larger collections at the most detailed level. Alaska's experience suggests that for smaller li- braries assessing 20 DIVISIONS or even 200 SUB-JECTS. a few hours are sufficient for each DIVISION once a library representative —already familiar with the collection —is trained in the assessment process. Assessment: Training. The LIRN Program will sponsor two-day training programs beginning in April and repeating monthly through December of 1983. At the workshops, participants will become famil- iar with a standard set of rating criteria and will be given worksheets, guidelines. and hands-on experience with collections of sizes and types similar to their own to practice the techniques. Following the workshops, local teams will be encouraged to work together on the assess- ment. supporting each other as they encounter unusual situations or difficult choices. ASSESSMENT STEPS DECISION TO ASSESS i ASSIGN STAFF i PLAN/SCHEDULE 1 TRAIN KEY STAFF —► ANALYSE AND VERIFY RECORD/REPORT 1 CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBJECT 1 no (END) yes Assessment: Measurement and Analysis. 'rite newh• trained staff members in each library then apply a set of standardized qualitative and quantitative ondary works, and circulation records. These measures --riteria to rate their own collection in each DIVISION will provide a "map" of existing collection strengths by the library has chosen to examine. Among the criteria to DIVISION, SUBJECT, FIELD, or TOPIC. The li- Im. used are counts of volumes, tapes, photographs, brary stay also determine the current acquisition com- artifacts. etc.. sheltlist measurements, inclusion of basic mitment level for each area. This may or may not he theworks Imm standard bibliographies, copyright dates, same Ir el as the existing collection strength, depending uhronolottical coverage, presence of primary and sec- con the librarvs current mission and needs. J I Assessment: Results. The results of these mea- surements and analyses will be recorded on standard worksheets. 'I�pically the collection strength and ac- quisition commitment indicators are numeric summary EARTH SMEENNC a PROFILE scores ranging from zero to five (comprehensive level). Participating libraries will keep copies for their own use t ts.s LIMA LOA LOA and send a set to the LIRN Program for inclusion in the s Regional Informational Resources database. LIRN will 4 44 edit the information on the worksheet and transfer it to 3 3 s tt s the database, ttweMet► aaoor ® R'— Library staff will be able to request specific reports from the database, such as, a complete profile of a single collection, a profile ofone or more subjects in a group of Mott•Mat.ne.. a 4 •33 I nearby libraries, or a profile of all collections in a given anat Q DIVISON, SUBJECT, FIELD, or TOPIC. LIRN will trtao financially support the design, implementation, and op - CM eration of the database through mid-1986 and will assist M libraries in determining the future status and location of a 4 4 the database. Mett n wtes 2M M M ttoptefLM —a' ILL,Yi%lii/� 4 tit�tan lrn Upie.re,. ti—tteCon�tan o—sa,ned "Were finding strengths and weaknesses we weren't aware of since we had not done this kind of review in the past." ❑ aotUotten t.�vot '• Dennis Stephens ® A*WMas CMM*r t University of Alaska at Fairbanks LIRN Glossary Assessment: Refers to comprehensive resource assess. ment. subject -by -subject, of library collections in the Pacific Northwest. Fred Meyer Charildbk Trust: Refers to Must created in 1982 by the will of Fred Meyer to foster economic development of the region with funds dedicated to the public interest. Library dnd brformation iteSourCe$ for the 'Vor[hmvst alit f: Refers to the first program actually estab- lished and staffed by the Trust. Created to improve information access in the Pacific Northwest which will Promote and enhance educational and economic deve•iopment. Survey: Refers to simple questionnaire on specialized collections. Begins in spring, 1985. Is distinct from assessment. Training: Refers to the two-day training needed for li. brary representative to learn standardized resource assessment process. Begins in April and runs monthly through 1985—completely subsidized by LIRN. 20 DIVISIONS: Refers to first and simplest level of resource assessment from which all other levels now. 200SUBJECTS: Refers to subjects within divisions. Is the second level of detail of resource assessment. 500 FIELDS: Refers to fields within subjects. Is the third level of detail of resource assessment. 5000 TOPICS: Refers to topics within fields. Is the fourth and most detailed area of -resource assessment. I L- --- — -- Costs LIRN will carry these costs of the resource assess- ment in 1985: • design, development, and distribution of the di- rectory of specialized information • development of a comprehensive training program • design and development of training materials • scheduling and logistics of all training workshops • training specialists and resource people • coordination and follow-up • travel, meals, and lodging for one representative from each participating library to attend a two- day workshop • design, development, and operation of the col- lections database URN may cover travel. meals, and lodging for a second or third library representative to attend a workshop, depending upon circumstances. In 1986 and beyond, LIRN will provide all mate- rials and forms used in the training workshops, but the sponsorship, organization. scheduling, and train- ing itself will be the responsibility of the libraries. Libraries will carry these costs in 1985: • nominal administrative staff time • two days of library representative time for training • snme 25-75 hours of staff time per DIVISION depending on the level of detail • nominal follow-up staff time for coordination and exchange of information on the work effort When a library administrator sends more than one representative to be trained, travel. meals, and lodg- ing for the second or third representative will be the responsibility of the home library unless prior ar- rangements are made with LIRN. In 1986 and beyond, libraries continue to carry the 1985 costs. In addition. through local and regional i coordination. libraries will sponsor and schedule workshops as needed using local library staff as trainers. v Benefits Library staff will have: • a clearer and more complete profile of subject - by -subject levels within their collections • a basis for more selective development of subject collections • an additional and more complete picture of re- source patterns locally and in the region • improved communication with other libraries engaged in the same assessment process • enhanced professional skills in systematic collec- tion development Library administrators will have: • an additional management tool to adapt their collections to changes in mission, programs, or user patterns • an additional database for internal analysis for developing acquisition policies, plans, pri- orities, and strategies • an additional tool to respond systematically to budget reductions or reallocations • additional data for resource sharing and collec- tion development arrangements with other libraries The Pacific Northwest will have: • patterns of information resources in the region comprehensively displayed • subject collections identified nearer the point of inquiry reducing the burden on large, distant collections • libraries able to coordinate their purchasing with other libraries when desired • non -print resources in corporations. govern- ment agencies, and special collections more widely known v • PAY ESTIMATE CITY OF KENAI Project BARON PARK WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS • Contractor Doyle Construction Company Address Rt. 1, Box 1225 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Phone 776-8552. NI w, ... N0 : 2 ✓Ctier �,�.�� �. lif/3 Ar6' Project No. Period From 11-9-84 to3-15-85 ANALYSIS OF ADJUSTED CONTRACT MIOUNT TO DATE 1 O1 Original contract amount 0141,560.00 I O2 Net change by change orders 30 Adjusted contract amount to date $141,560.00'� ANALYSIS OF WORK COMPLETED ® Original contract work completed $132,091.50 OS Additions from change orders completed 0 © ffaterials stored at close of period 0 O7 Total earned®+OS +©- $132,091.50 ® Less retainage of n percent 0 O9 Total earned less retainago -O3 - $132,091.50 10 Less amount of previous payments $118,252.35 11 Balance due this payment $ 13,839.15 i cc: Contractor Doyle Construction Company ' Engineer Trans -Alaska Engineering �w � *am".e,tsnNa et = es CwM S OK ,-% DYH t ' Page 2 of 3 PAY ESTIMATE N0: 2 BARON PARK WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR According, to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that all Items and amounts shown on the foes o! this Periodic Estimate for Partial Payment ore correct; that all work has boon performed and/or material supplied in full accordance with the requirements of the referenced Contract, ad/or July authorized deviations, substitutions. alterations. and/or additions= shot the foregoing is s rho rue and Pcorrect u of �bea'Bolancofi)ue Tbis Pnymcnv"ehas beandrcIncluding the d that the undersigned and his subcthis ontractors tractorshave Estimate; apprlrabfe this) a. EDComplied with all the labor provisions of said contract. It. CI Complied with all the labor provisions of said contract except in those Instances where an honest dispute exists with re- spect to said labor provisions. (it (6) is Chocked. describe briefly nature of dispute.) marcn Ib, '19 85 Title_ Secretary -Tr a tr r 1, ,1 CERTIFICATION OF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER i I certify that I have chocked and verifiad the above and foregoing Periodic Estimate for Partial Payment. that to the best of my knowlodgo and ballot it is a true and correct statement of work performed and/or material supplied by the contractor= chat all Work and/or material included in this Periodic Estimate has boon inspected ed a by me and/or assistants a that it ban been pa,formed and/or supplied in full uccordanca with raquiremuynsd of rho reference conirset �andto or tlwt ports ymen claimed and toque by rho contractor is correctly computeJ on the basis of walk performed ad/al mate. tint sup fe to dal Sig d ans- 4AMMV �r ng • D te- ZZ �ifsa.L^tF Ate P E•PAYMENT CERTIFICATION BY FIELD ENGINEER I Check typo of paymonl certified; 01 have ehaeked this estimate ag,ainst the contractor's Scheditk of Amosmis for Contract Payments, the notes and reports of my inspections of the project. anJ the perioJio reports submitte.l by the architect 'engineer. It is my opinion that the sratemant of woek performed And/or materials supplied is accurate. char the conttacror is observing the requirements of the contract, and that Inc contractor should he pail the amount requested above. I cortify all ark dror materials under the contract has I•een inspected by me anJ that it has been Iv rformad and 'or sup• plied i Z ,Jaewith the requirements of the contract.v Z2 /y%iQ/l&w E3 rans-Alaska Engi� g,..r, (Date) Approved (Commattna officer! (Paw) I { L' � • I IV F KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ?„-AF, REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING FEBRUARY 19 19651 7100 P.M. BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SOLDOTNA, ALA= Pass No, , •AGENDA• i convveineedpannd mi e theeirdedecision lsgarding1 =Itoetaun Club appeal. A. CULL TO ORDER 2 B. PLEDGE 01 ALLEGIAME 2 C. =VOCATIONI aev. Roy Williams, lot Baptist, Kenai 2 t D. ROLL CALL 2 E. VACANCY, DESIGNATION OR SEATING OF ASSEMBLYMEMMR 2 F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2 Aprvd. Crretd. as G. CO)MITTEE REPORTS (a) Education (Valli, Johnson, Mullen, Sko stud) 2 randel, Nash) 2 (b) Plnance (Csawlord Casey (a) Land Acquisition/Disposal (Name, Johnson, !loose) 2 (ttd) Lsgisiativs (Dat4le,��Ryysens. 8ko�setpad) 2 Wo�e(aa=iall, Moasban))) 2 ; ti) PMubls Dole, (g) semmdliver $"Gist 01c9abon, Dais. Mullen. Stephens. Glick) 3 R. AGENDA APPROVAL AND CONSENT AGENDA ; (a) Approval of Co®ssosattva Library Books 3 ,. . I. ORDINANCE HEllltl(GS . (a) Ord, 85-4. "Llsitift the Sale of Firsworks i WUNN An Are" Of the %=at Peninsula Borough Outside the Cities of Kenai. Soldotna, Homer, Uchsmak City. Seward and SeldovW (Mullen 3 See I Dlaiak. Dale, Glick. Moose, Skogstad. Sarah, Subst.0 . `. wait i Stephens) Ord. 65•4 (Sbet-l� "Limit the Sale of Firaworks sae the "mi Peninsula Borough s -. us Ontaide the Cities of Kensi. Soldotna. Homer, 3 See p Uchsmak City. Seward and Seldovia" (Muiisn, Subat./3 } Valli i Sk6getsO a��s• `� b 33�� "B the Sale and Use of "sIi Area of the tout PeainsuL Borough Outside the Cities of Homer, Raahemak i City, tenet, Seldovis, Seward and Soldotas." 10 Enacted ; ns. Valli. Mellen. Dale, !XTR Feidl3ed (Moor, Glick. Stephen, --- - - Skogst. Sewall) ds ' s. SS-27 "Setting an Advl.sory Vote of the - — or aatorata oa the Sale cad Uae of ItWithin the Ksaai Peninsula Borough" 11 Adopted (Bewail) .. (b) Ord. 1 -6 in8sos 2Develoo0pment Commission � to Serve as Overall Economic Development Proggrram Committee for the Purposes of Maintaining Eliot- "i bility for Assistance Under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965" (Mayor) it En" 4 r h - 1 { fi f • I 1 • fl 1 I J. INTRODOCTION Of ORDINANCES (a) OrdOrds 894 "Appsoppstating and:Authorizing the SL00,900 Borough funds to • ture of of Proceed Through the Construction Documents and Construction inspeation Phase of Architectural . go ass for the Renovation of the Romer former Riggh School (To a Junior Righ) and Romer Middle 12 SabooI (To an Elementary facility)"(Mayor) HRG 3/19 (b) .1 laska Pr�dingf for these ZS AWS a!e General ObligatW loads of the Central Xaaa. Peninsula Hospital Sasvi. AV" of the Borough ' in the //���ssata Principal Amonat of Not to Exceed 09;000,000 to Provide funds Regqaairad to Rsfnnd Certain Outstanding General Obligation Vends of $aid Service Area, fixing Certain Ds- 12 tails of Such Bonds and Authorizing Their Sols" HRG 3/19 (Msyos) ' (a) 00d 881 It "An Ordinance of the Kenai Peninsula orb; 1�laska, Authorizing and Providing for the issuanae of Not to Exceed $6,495,000 of General Obligation Service Area Bonds of the Vosough for the Purpose of Raising funds to Construction in the Pay W Costs of Nospital Central %out Peninsula Ro ital Service AV" in the Vosaagh, fining Details of Said Bonds, Providing for the fors and Mamter of $al• of fail faith end Said Son", and Pi TsS$ the Credit of the Central liens! Peaiauala Hospital 13 AM of,� Borough to the Payeuat RRG 3/19 TServicee (d) Ord. 82-12 "Appr tang and Authorizing the Borough funds to end Impure of Si 3,411 of Proceed Through the D•st Devslopmsnt Phase of Services for Architectural and Pro jec�Maaagement the Proposed 1985 Vend tesu• New Public School Projects for the Na Hope School, Nikieki Etesentasy" (Mayor) Ht133 3/19 (•) "Awnding 0510.10 Pastmining to the 14 an to Bor�h Code of Ordinances to Provide for City Appointerats to the Naste failed Disposal Comission at City Expense" (Nash) Introd. (f) -14 "Appropriating $95.000 for Nikiski fire 8 (Mayor, Req.Nikkiskniafire Sd.) 14 3/19 K. CONSIDERATION Of RESOLUTIONS (s) t s -4 "Establish Guidelines to Be coasting f to Seoios Citizsas' 14 ADM sell Organizations" (Sinter Citizen Special Cmts) As Amend (b) to Proceed s. 8 •12�"AuthorizingBthe MayorOF computer aaunla�conversion Costs vith Passphesats, Training o Two Additional 1Ss AmiPr ate. MZ tysand�� (R�t) A (a) Res, 85•11 "Authorizing a Letter of Entry for i" C MIT uction end Maintenance of a Service Road, Coave�os Belt Corridor, Rent Road and alities Selected and Associated on Sorou Patented Lands and Providing !ehr the Issuance 16 Pstpd 3-19-85 of the Easement Document Upon Completion" (Mayor) (d) • -24 "Approving the Design Development oaumea s !or the Central Paninsula Ros ital Phase III Chemical Dependency Unit and Emoftencq Suite Addition Project and Authorizing C.T.A. to Proceed with the Construction Documents Phass" 16 ADPTD (Mayor) (a) Wes. 89-26 "Su orting Passage of 8B72 Which W3081MRse Title 29 of the Alaska Statutes Pertaining to Local Governments" (Mmick/Dale/ 1166 � )d (9) - 4 "Stating tba Asseabl Position Suypost- s Property sights in Connection Nith V52 aor Plans Concernthethe r."at River 16 ADM Wssageeasat" (Hadshan) DEFEATED 2-5, Motion to As Amend iteaonsides 2-19-85 L. PENDTNO LUMLATION (This it= lists legislation which will be addressed at a later time as'noted$ not for action this mesting) (a) Aovdddition. Siction 3� TlBs 3A1W,B�it8y1co! Seward . from s-i to 8-3 District's (Mayor) RM 3•5 (b) sky fire 8 Service to psoowi de pfimg irree froteettA a Sarviass and Providing for an gloated Board" (Mayor) PSTMD. TO 5-7-85 $. lOAl1AL P I PIMITIITM-11 WITS PRIOR NOTICE UPON SUBJECTS NOT 09 Tog MUTING AGENDA N. WATOR'S REPORT (a) Status of Solid Waste Disposal Sites 18 0. 01M BUSIM8 18 P. ABSEMMLT AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS 18 Q• � �� AND C TO ASSZII TTFS '.SE S UM VOTERS 18 AGUM s. INPOSMkPTONAL MATZRIALS AND M RIVIB S. NOTME Of NEST MEMO AND ADJOURNMENT (Joust Worinession with School Board, Feb. 23 and 18 Regaur. March S, 1985) t, { KENAI PENINSULA BOROVOR REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING nBRUARY 19, 1989j 700 P.M. BOROUGR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SOLDOTHA, ALASKAPri. and�the Boto conducting rd t of is IAdsatment Assembly emed and madebustnessr l CALL their a decision regarding the 1<achemakru., Gun Club appeal. PRESE fs Boardo mbers Nash pall!, Malian, Crawford. Carey Sewall, Moors Glick, Dimmick, Madahan, Johnson, tfaie, Stephens and ikogetad. B'XCUBEDs Boardmembers Yasdel and Kame. Declaim by Board of Adjustment Appeal oiS�Pl�kgSayCy Gus �Decisioa ASSEMOLNEMBER GLICK MOVED TO GRANT THE APPEAL AND OVER = THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING 001=ISp8I00 ORAMTING AM EXCEPTION TO THE O0U FUJ Y TI SM.A�SON�=AT � COS tnOWS 1019 ORDINANCE TO A�VARIANCE HAVE of SEEM MLT. THIS MOTION WAS BASED UPON THE BOLLOf M Pi110two i 1. That the proposed use as a shooting ranggeed adlacdireate propertiss. slgolfioant noise an the proposed 1. There we rosidenaes landiateiy adjacent to this site. 3. pr properties sud Verameain then vicinity of th caks n$*. teat 4. That meaanres to rotoot persons and property from these hazards and soles cannot Ce adequately ma". S•wivahazards teleastMttpropertlas and their GW&ted.As 90 espr� sedthe opinion that he ftsh voiced Objection di�� t believe the to � i factors �woa d be. slgalficaat. ASSEMBLER MASH Mom TO DELibTE POIM! i . , POINT 4. DELtTE "AND NOISE", POM S. "AND MISS DAMAGE". Mr. Moore voiced support for grastins the appeal based on residents' fear for safety reasons and espansios of the University of Alaska Con nity College. Mr. Carey advised, as asseslbly representative to 'the keen! Peninsula Comennit� College Consci1 on Thurs. Yob. 14 the Council approved the Homes saes NleatlOn M!1 i a notation that the location of the San oi�r and the site being discussed WAS incompatible with their selection. �1i,,CCraMf Carey, JoUS hnson d Skogs aid OF 00, .b YIBs Sash* NING THE PLANKING DE toy REGAADIi(G THE ZACM MAI< BAY GUM 0 ASIn GLICK Monoll To CUM TM APPEAL ADOPTED OM A VOTE OF 13 YE8, i NOr Crawford voting no. Pros. Dinsdak advised for informational purposes that the chsizuw of aLands ifta�aubr�acommittee. inding areasonable s� t beeferredo the With action completed, the Board of Adjustment adjourned. MW i t0:f1Ai ISHINSMA BOROUGR ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETING PEBRUARY 19, 1985 A, CAL16 TO ORDER The meetingg was called to order by Pros. -Marilyn Dimmick at approsimately-8000 P.M. 8. PLEDGE OF ALLE ONCE C. U490CATZONs Aosemblymember Carey gave the invocation. 0. ROLL CALL paES=s Assemblymembor# Nash, Valli, Motion, Crawford, Carey, 2-19-85 Saall, M e. Giiak, Dimmick, MaGahsn, Johnson, Dale, Staphoas and Sko stad.. Mayor Thompson, Adm. Asst. Soft, Aety. Sosdaker, Public Works Director 8akert, Sorough Clerk SsindLOT, Dep. Clark DeLacoe PRESENTs Assomblymembers Nash, WALL, Mutton, Crawford, Carey, 2-20-83 Sewall, Moore Glick, 01mmick, NeGahan, Johnson, Dale, Stophons and �kogstad. Moor Thompson. Adorn. Asst. Seat, Atty. Boedeksr, Public Works Director 8akert, Borough Clark Srindley, Dept. Clark DeLaces BJI Ms Asoosblymasfbors Vandal and Reses. 2/19 8 2/20 E. vA=Cl, DESI(A1AtM OR SEATUG Of ASSOmLYMMU V. ApPtIOV� S OF FEBRUARY S. 1985 BOA i REGULAR RRYXIED AR CmenTME REPORTS (a) Education (Valli, Johnson, Motion, Skogstad) The Committeo recommended "do pass" on Ord. 85-12. (b) Vinaaae (Crawford. Carey, Vandal, Nash) Mr. Crawford advised that for lack of a quorum< them Was no formal meeting, but theta was discussion regarding Ord. 85-9 and Ord. 85-12. Res. 8 -4 was also discussed- (c) Land Amuisotion/viagphe d (Koons, Johnson, Moore) (d) Legislative (Date, Reena, Skogstad) Mr. Dale advised that the legislative committee had not met howsver, he said that B.S. 58, raw fjiissh tss credit. would be hoard in 86use Resources the s Senate regarding 2 the �foi�tionili funds for been introduced construction. S.S. S1 would inaresss it to 90f and S.S. 159 would increase it to 75x. Per inquiry. Mr. Data advised that the Committee bad not taken nay position on B.S. 39 regarding fireworks. Mr. Data was encouraged to summarize conversations conducted with legislators in a letter format and that there be provision of copies to Assomblymombers. (e) Local Affairs (Carey. Moore. Stsphons) Mr. Carey advised that the Committee meeting had been rescheduled to Veb. 24. 300 p.m. in the So 81 Commons. (£) Public Works (Sewall. Dale. McGahan) .2- 0 1 I %EnAi Paust sottouaN ASSEMBLY RE(iULAtt TiNO FE$tWARY 19 LA . ' I Mr. Sawall said the Committee recommended introduction for has March 19 1985 fog Osds. 85-9 and 85-12. Resolutions 85-24, 85-26 and 80-2d wets given a ;'do pass" recommendation. (S) Komi R vehens,rispecial (Maashan, Dale, Mullen, 10 Mrs. Hoeshan advised the Committee met on Feb. 12 and di information regarding 4181na50 ditches and impact on the Res. 88-14, discwsion a ainst taking MY footage from PrLYSt4 property ouaass !or p ht'La us, intosmagion roLowdinS list whether chat should beio included in In $t,�to the m�smorial bsS N. AGMA APPROVAL AND CONSENT AGENDA Assasbirmember alicfc requested that W. 85-25, 228. 85-26 s 85-28 SlBT.) be added to the consent &Senda. (ta action a Assemblymember Gliak filed a reconsideration on Res. 65-28 as there were corrections that needed to bs incorporated. Mrs. Naashan objected to patting See. 85-26 on the consent ago Mr. "widKation. Objection vsi be by Mri McshanOrdinance 1 I= NOTION TO MOVE CONSIDMTSON OF REB. 85-27 MOM TO 01 NEA1111105 WAS DEFEATED ON A VOTE OF 7 1E8 7 90s Nash, WALL, Crawford, Mocra, Dimick, Maashan and Dais voting no. Mr. Csrsy then uked that Ras. 85-27 be sowed for considerate (a) Ord. 65-4 Sbat. There was no obJsatioa. Mrs. Glick requested that Ord. 65-12 be added to Consider4 Resolutions, as item (b), reorSanisinS subsequent items tacos The agenda wu approved, as amended, by uamisoas consent. (a) Acoval of Commemorative Librarr looks (Coia■orativa Resolution to be Presented, 3-5-85) I i. ORDINANCE NEARD(GS (a) 8 -4 t'LiuitinS the Sets of Flsawerks �d n Are" of the Kenai Peninsula Borough ` Outside the Cities of Ream, Soidotne, Nomer, f Raa6awk City, Seward sad SsldovW (Mullen Dimmick, Dale, aLiak, Moore, Skogatad, Bewail, vsili 6 Stephens) ore. 85-4 8bst,12 t dotrain u scr ough outside the Citias of Rensi, Soldotna, Romer, Raaha:aak City, Sward and SsldowW' (Mallon, Wahl 6 Skogstad) --- - - Ord. 85-4 ftma "Limiting the Sala of Fireworks M of the Wet Peninsula Borough outside the Cities of Nomar, %achasuk City, Renal _-- Seldovia, Sward and Soldotns, and Limiting the bi of Firaworks Dur6s Periods of Nigh Fire Oanger" (Moore, click, Stephens, Valli, Mullen 6 Skogstad) public hearing was opened on Ordinance 85-4. 4 Geoffrey Wilson. Lconasd vaisas, John 088186 ags C. David Brosso Martin, Larry Adams, Las Palmer, Don Ball C. Duane Anda i Sszton, Verne Gehsks, Dave Season, ALM Bishop, Alan MILLI 81son, Colleen Cashman, Bill Hamner. Marty %roll, and Joel addrsssad the Assembly as proponents of Ord. 85-4. -3- . %=I PENINSULA BORous A88EMBLy REGULAR MEETING WERE—" 19, 196-5 statements were cads by homeowners in the group expressing their fear of property damage due to fires and irritation at being awakened at all bourn by individuals usinss fireworks without consideration. Testimony was given by iise ch3els a police officer, a forestry Division officer and various munictpat officials from around the Borough rs&zsaa-ding inlormatton they had obtained about fires relating to lirewosk0. Robert Ball urged banning of bottle rockets, limiting the @&Amon, rset-ioting the age to 18 for usage, and education provision by the vendors tbedselves. Kr. gobslk, A@st. State fire Karshall and Supervisor Of 800theeatral Aisoks stated that be appeared as neither a proponent nor oppoasnt to ON. 85-4. Be appeared because the office is a data collectins assney among other thin e. Be said the Alaska National fire lncidsnt Reporting System ( M) indicated that over the last five 76Gars, 14 firevotm caused fires occurred with is property losses Approaching8700,000. Be. said that because.of these retments, they ports by various lire deparknow how most of theme fires were started and by whom -- ova- Sot of the incidents# wars trill -en Laying with fireworks. Be made a personal observation that be vas of° the opinion that Ancho-age residents travel to the Borough to obtain fireworks. Mr. Carey questioned information that Anchorage residents ware getting ■eat of their fireworks here. Mr. Schalk advised that the only other place that fireworks could be obtained to in Gl*wllen o- Camwen and be felt that it was obvious that people werenotspins to as risers wweree being broufireworks. fm ft out lde, probably to in#iuggggasi�on airlines. Mrs. Glick said that it was her understanding that the State was igouin permit@ for a two-year period rather than a one-yyear Period- ! uksd Mr. Schalk if there vas some reasoning other dum sconoml.ce pprradicatins the decision. Mr. Ochs it advised that there still had to bs a review every year in order to make the permit valid to insurers who only tam policies for a your. Ms. Moore Asked Mr. Schalk if a fireworks vendor was not in aanplisnas with local laws, for instance being open when required to ba closed or violation of the Borougordinance, h sales tas ordinae, would that be "use for the State lire Marghuli to ppau�il the vendor's permit. Mr. Schalk @aid not for a sale# tax infraction. Rsgsrain an infraction of hours permitted to be open, the Permits ccflstt hour$ that the local body specifies if thus are spsciai hours. Mr. Nash Asked how often the office was able to determine who is responsible for starting a firs. Ur. Sobalk amid that local fire departments do investigation Of firs@ and fill out reports forwarded to the state office. Beverly Jones, Garald lsrlq,•Tom Patmor, Louis March, Jr., William . pepper, Nelson Weblesn and Dane Auggi&s appeared as opponents to ordd 85•4 or to the Substitute$ 2 6 3. op@ition comments included etatemisnts that fireworks do not am$s firms but people that use fireworks taws rises, statistical informselon indicates that prohibiting does not solve the problem -- it worsens it, the duties�g neomp hy of sad b b 8aves�t @dom train constitut constitutionally- AdditionallAnd y. Mr. Louis March, Jr., President of the Alaska fireworks Association, stated that if the ordinance passed, it would put vendors out of business. Be presented information on a Consumer Protection Safety Committee, a 5-year study on Class 9 fireworks which concluded that they were sale if common genes were used. At an Association meeting prior to the assembly meeting, members supported working with the fire chiefs association on the Peninsula in dealing with fireworks! reported d oubliesipatures- He in submitted opposition petition Ord. gned 9. 4. 850 - 4 • mom r %=At PENINSULA SGRGUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MMUN_G FEBRW-T 19, 1985 Mr. Johnson asked how fireworks are classified. Mr. March deferred to Mr. Farley. Mr. ftcloy indicated that the classification of explosives is done by the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, subject to local lave. The kinds of firavorks classified isy the 0spartme"t are Class C • eo"o" fireworks. Class B, special fireworks, us the "as used for public display. Class A espiosives $se anything from dysrait0 to Mt missiles. Bottle rocket is a cousin industry team end genoraily was a fairly small item eacospassing several difforent rocket$. Mr. Johnson continued then actual! by the msmsfacturor's own identification b7 "bottle rocket" it might include other types of its" i! the Asaesb y were to entertain banning bottle rockets. Mr. Farley indicated that a simple way to do this would be to insert "comeonly knows as bottle rockets". He said this has Coonasistte�ntly withstood any kind of a court test. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Farley what his prefesstop woo and field of mortise. ortis . Mr' Farley responded par question hg, that he was a Mr. Stephens asked if the Assembly were to compile legislation in which the body was speaking to $acific typos in the same line as a bottle rocket, would it be possible for other cues to be taken into account. Mr. Farley responded that these are no national statistics which use reliable which are set to fires associated with aortal" tZpos of itasis. He indicated that Roma" candles tend to be mush less of -a probleg. Bottle rockets is a sugoet which bas bean addressed by soverai state. Mr, gavall asked if when bottle rockets are barred, is there tuaressed swiss in other types of firarotks. Ms. factor said there wars no statistics to give precise infomtIen of this type. Be said that bottle rockets are a u"ique item which was be a problem, while others we not when used properly. Mr. Carer askad Mr. March if it were two that any vendors cone from "outside in the susmar to sell fireworks. Mr. much responded the Association is made up of Alaskans to his knwledg*. �' `s�a much if the thtOra Cho e�Su"Mrurob Indicated aAssociation could live with 85-4 &*St. Z. Mr. Ogle asked Mr. March speoificall about how the Association felt shoat sales to minors. Ms. March said that there were mixed fsoling� th regarding this. Ho felt though that e sajority had no PIOUS with as ago rostsiction of sixteen. However, NOW f0lt that a largo part of tisair bustnees revolved around !custom, fifteen dad sixtsen year olds who were somatims sore responsible than soma dduits. Mr. Nillim Pepper provided information regarding fireworks related enjurtos. Mri Fappor's information listed several items in which there are semhi incidences of injuries -- other recreational USES, bousehold items. ate. Be sgggastod addressing the lawbroakest an lath" ththose who use firevork$ to a safe and Ono issoner. r "sorted that by banning vendor Gala of fireworks seasonal!y it we"ley be the some No tell Haberman that they would not be able to fish for salmon in the an of May throusb August. Be suggested a joint effort by fireworks rotatless with iraawn and polies offiaors to educate tho public, bamsing of fireworks to those under 16, and if the issue vote taken to a vote, asks it clear and concise. Mr. Hash asked Mr. Pepper if he bad any suggestions how the Fireworks Association could assist in policing "outside" vendors who do not resistor for psymnt of Borough sales tax. Mr. Fepper.said that the Association would have no legal clout. Ho stated that if there is a ban, he felt there would result a gloater illegal use of Class 8 fireworks. In closingg coaments. Mr. Pepper stated that the fireworks dealers are ready to do what to�q can together to accept a reasonable bill even to the point of wiliingno$s to accept a ban of bottle rockets •• thair top seller. •s- - - - L - -- — -- -- 0 EAU PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSE6t8LY REGULAR MEETSN0 PEBRUARY 19. 1985 Mr. Verne Gahrke addressed his comments as a former fireworks vendor and as one opposed to fireworks. He observed that money was going out of the state for their sale, and that from his own testing fireworks are a lire hazard. Mr. Alan Pbiltl. s appeared as representative of the peninsula lire chiefs and asked that they go on record as supportive o! the original Old. 85-4. Mrs. MlcOaban asked if the fire abiefs association had taken any stases on campfires. Mr. Phillips replied that tb- take the acme stews u CM forest service -- asipfires should be kept in a controlled space such as a prepared oampsite. as than asked if in the sans vein, fireworks sig�ht be used on the beach. No said his personal opiniaa was that fireworks should be dose by professionals in s controlled display, as provided by the cities of Seward and Noses. Jason Elaon representative of the City of Kenai Piro Dept. and President of the Alaska State Firefighters Assoc. advised that in addition to his other duties he finations as a public fire educator. No stated the firefighters Assoc. SUPPOSts any legislation controlling sale and use. He stated that Alaska suffers most of ail fifty states in fire losses, althougb fireworks may be a minimal part of that. Mr. Carey asked Mr. LlsoB if be would support using names from finss for fire oducattos. We 910oa rerpoadsd that be would. Joasms Nagen advised the usembty as a nurse who bas sass damage to children -- o *Lally us sd children -- due to fireworks, she "ad the Ord a Would adopted. She advised that she had no statistics rsnatdins accidents related to fireworks but she hoped that this would be included in consideration of the legislation.' ASBEMBLYMEMBER MULU M NOUD ENAC'AM OF ORD. 85-4 (SSST. 2). r Mr. Nation addressed remarks to Sabotitate It stating that essentially it would bus as of fireworks frog t1a7 i dto Sept. 30 of eaab year. There was a sasssst clause that would deman it was either extended or modified by the Assembly on January It 1986. The ordinance mmould take sffeat laediately. Mr. Carey advised that this ordinssae was not going to ebasge the fact that it is already illegal for someone to start a firb with fireworks. to eommsstsd that if indeed the Borough wars going to start regulatins noise pollution than threewibselers, motorcycles, snow msebinss and doggy were contributors to notes pollution, too. Ne spoke about the osforeement problem, &"retain$ the sale and not the use, and that he felt people should be aduasted to be responsible rather than regulate or restrict tbair freedom. ASSOOLIMJLOLR STEPSEMS MOVED TO AMEMD 00. $5-4 (055T.2 STRS 2W TBL TZM VMMUS, ADD "Sales, nos and possession would to allowed from June 25 to the Jay 4 and from October 31 through March 1 if no open fire bps is to affect.(go sales from March 2 to June 25 and July S to October 30.) ADD , Sales, use and possession of bottle rockets will not be persittod. Sales to, ap of and possession b� oa-rsons under sixteen years of a e would not be �esmitted. STRIA TITLE SECT 10.18;120, ADD S An psom rodesiring to pit, offer for sae or expose sole fireworks within the halts of the Kenai Peninsula Borough outside of cities, mot first comply with the Alaska State Statutes (Chapter 16.72) and shall present the "Retail Stand Permit" issued by the State Firs Harobai's office to the Kenai Peninsula Soroup finance department for the purpose of obtaining a permit for each stand location prior to any sales of fireworks. The person registering and for a Retail Stand Permit from the Fire Marshal shall be required to restater with the Borough as a salter under the salef tax ordinance. 9. The endorsement dad/or issuance of a boroughs-.j -6- U. - I - - - - - - - - - --- -- - -- -- --- - L *A*. evarusurt� aeneuett USSALY UGvLAR NEETINO MWARY 19, 1981 I i persrit for fireworks stands shall expire on December 31, of the calendar year in which it was issued. mm person holding svah��ppsrmit mot apply annuallyu is required for renewal of the state Resaii Stand Yasmit"• C. withi s the corporate .limits of the Borough Outside the aosporats limits 0i the cities of Renal, Soidotne, Serasd. Rosier and 8anlfdovia it shall be anlavinl,�to Sell f. 8.140, wiithout0first300, ObtDD Oist `!a iGg d io�saal theifs) 8 ZCT-10.avorks 18.140, e do to enforesmsat dependent Mg. Sessile agsinat the eclaro a upon open cioasd periods declared by the state forestry division. Its. Sale slaks against the smandment and urged the Aseesibir to adopt a coarae o action before the midnight deadline. Via. Hails spoke against the ssandsent referring to information front the petition submitted (petition to retain firar0sks). Signatures included acre individuals who had also signed petitions against the Rachasrtc Cue Club. She stated that sa��s� hazardous %&o Cur Club location was refused .Was AT •she Would vote fbr the ordinance but against the Va. Noora expressed opposition due to use during the summer period. W. Naafi asked Mr. Stephens if ahiidrea ands sixteen under dissot y supervision of adults Weald be able to detonatei�nttheir asklesa or area. Re Advisedspc cut be vac" just addressing#PmlkSSW to thotse under sixteen• penalty Mr. an50 other criminal, alas tion. $Nr � pIndiccaatedoittion did not. Agszvvml tit MUMWVgD 1oRKeg— pOSTPOHEt�N! of otm. Ss-4 titan THE IORP OT Yg� Cts TM AIM ffimrm An 1ti1LLLU 110 TANE_ f otminA�rcE tn�DER cotrsari. . Nr. everfosd opOko against O-at9oae■snt. Re stated that a. best � . i one of the forsis of the ordinance vas a bsadaid appsoaob. that if the people of the SWOD b br ballot, vets to ban fisaWosks ryas a soup Mould bove to be hound for MfOreesiant. Be =gad taking action and not leaving things up in the air for vendors. i gh gTEptt W CALLED MR THE QUMION 00 MR. NOORE' S TO mm TO 1?OSTt' = HAS MUM on A VOTE 4 9 N0, s YESs gash, _ .. Scull, Noose, Glick and Disiek voting yes. ASSmoLmmu NASB m m -TO SIRTRE THE TWO VRMAS Itl THE STEMS t A1mmum AND ROUSOM STRUM THE ORIGINAL FILTH NHEltEAB -} - Nr. mbsilen asked eoofirsistioa that what would osasntiall happen Woaid be there would 1s t1 June fireworksS fs i a�7 S to Octoberi peninsula borough j — 30. This wu confirsed. Nr. trash asked farther clarification that the first amendment would address Ord. 8s--t4 (Sbst.2)1 siisinating Section 10.18.201 inssstistg the permitting Ocoee frog Ord• Ss•4t and would change the penalty THE t7A8H AttE ONDT TO THE STUMS AMD"= FAUM ON A VOTE OF 6 NO. S YESt Nallea, Carey, Glick, NeGaban. Johnson and Stephens voting ao. 7 I i KENAi PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19 1985 Mr. Carey spoke against the amendment as it subatanciaLly ehan ed the origin""t of the original ordinance opened for public hearing. Mr. Oswalt spoke against the amendment as it would .not address the problems in Seward during the two week period left in effect. The attorney stated that per his understanding the Stephens Ounde nt would first amend Ord. $5.4 (Sbot. 2) 4 changing the Section 10.18.20 changing dates from May 1 to Sapt. 30 to March 2 through June 23� and July S through October 30 basing sales. AddIne Substitute 1-Audi Additionally penalty would be cchanggedltol$500. 01 DING '� AND. POOBUSSZO "��1M �GHOUT� SM Of � MWMT VMW "SALE" APPEARS. Mrs. "&ban and Mr. Oswalt spoke against the amendment. Mrs. MaGshan felt the amendments and ordinance were restrictive of rights of individuals. Mr. Sewall stated that it would be a Catch 22 situation if a ban were announced by the state forester and people were already in possession of fireworks, thus bolas in violation. Ms. Carey spoke for the amendment stating that the body should really take a stand or do nothing. THE JOHNSON AMIQID)IM FAILED ON A VOTE OF 4 YES, 10 MOt Crawford, Carey, Glick and Johnson voting yes. Mr. Moors addressed the stophms' amendment advising that there would be no reference to basing the saduring es es uao if those is a firs ban on weoatithpderiod o! time from Jun* 2S to the Fourth of July. This by Mr. Boadeker. Mr. Okogstsd spoke T11010t the 8tophsns' amendment and urged passage of Osd. 85-4 (ghat. Z) in its original test. go said that it should be given • try and attar sunsettiag, put it, to a vote of the people. THE STEPBd- AMENMW FAZI O) ON A VOTE OF 10 NO, 4 YES Mutton. Carey, Glick and Stephens voting yes. ASSDDf I I m I HASH MOVED TO ST MIN SM. .10.18. 20. "OR SOLICIT ORDERS FOR TU SAW. THE MRI NAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 12 YES, 2 NOr Valli and Crawford lasso. Mrs. MaGaban spoke against Ord. 85-4 (Obst. 2) and urged a vote by the people. "IM MLYMmlbQ I CRAWFORD . PROPOSED AN ANU MM TO ENACT ORD 85-4, STEPHENS/CLICK SUBSTITUTE (#I). Mrs. Glick said that she felt it wan wrong to do nay substantial d�ddineonanS�e�ps�'PeOPis . Shsa threason she end Mr.tophPat this substitute for considseation was because when the original ordinance was introdncsd there wu substmtiai comment from the public and assesM►lymembars. She stated that whatever is dons. the "use" should be iaclndsd. It the "to was based without the use, regardless of the Periods Of time, this would accomplish nothing as fireworks could be stockpiled. ASSE11 'MMMM CLICK MOVED TO AMEND ORD 85-4 (SBST.1) TO ADD "AND USE VNEREM SALES" IS INDICATED. Msyor Thompson asked Mrs. Glick how would the Borough enforce the use portion of the motion. Mrs. Glick said that it could be dome. A Person may call in a complaint, and those truly bothered would appear to sign the complaint at a magistrate's office. -8- i 1 KENA PENSNSULA BAROUOM ASSEMBLY REM AR MEETING pEBRMI 19. 1985 THE CLICK AMIWMI ►ir WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE Of 9 YES, S 001 Mullen, Saaall Moore, Dale and Skogstad voting no. . TSE H W1ORD MOTION TO ENACT ORD. 65-4 (SBST. 1) AS AMEND® BAILED ON A VOTE OF 6 YES, 6 NOS Valli, Mutton, Sewall, Dale, Johnson and Skosetad voting no. ASSEMBLYMlJ!' n -07E1NENB MOVED TEAT THE ASSEMBLY RECONVENE THE PEB. 19 MOTi0N Cl1=M= OWN A VOTE p Fig Y49, IIIAN $ Johaioa voti g no P.M.30 THE At this midnight hour, further discussion of legislation Was not permitted as per rule. Pros. Dlsick said that there Wgs a bit of confusion on the term '•caliinss f��or she qussttoa" which comas from Wts Rules of Orders, it an �tdividnat wishes to close debate Wit a_ o`a _ ra es, Cnen a motion is made on the previous question. On robnam 20, the assembly reconvened and continued with consideration of,Ord. 85-4. 1tr. Crawford observed the ordinance for consideration had been substantially chaigad after public hearing Was closed. Mr. Crawford stated that he had talked with the State vice Narshali's office, anw isv itabbad �i an 9M Station u istaa�css16 strong ofA law. ft. Sewall and Ns. Moore spoke against postpoaemsati they voiced the Opinion that the legislation +radar consideration Was an amalgamation of �ablie testimony heard oa the 19th and that the needs of the publlic beyond the vendors needs had to Abe considered- Va. Johnson end fir. cuff _speke for postponement. Both- refloated Oat by banning this year, ivadividuels' livelihood would be cut off. M� Thompson stated that rather then arbitrarily taking the right aaid�the�v�s' f sho�havee tthe he rigom hts to be put ttto heiir inve�ntoriies already acarusd. C&AVIM MUMA VOTE 60 pO V iR Mliu65-44, TSii 119MM 119985 RUED 09 Skoptad voting no. ABIM I t,lIIDldLR NC CARO NOVRD TO DZIM SECTION 10.is. 20 •• LD�tUM ON SALZ, ORD. 65-4 MOST. 3). AND TRL ORDINANCE ACCORDMI. Nrs. NoOahan stated that this amendment would in effect put the l�w���� back to Substitute f2, no use during the time Wham the ctiastia conditiena exist to wasssnt closure, and laave in the mcsptions liMMSO and delete the section regardinS sales. Mr. Skogetad asked clarification ss to whether an amendment already submitted and failed can be reintroduced. After a review of the amendment was no�eduplication the land could beeconssii�4 that the Mr. Skogstad stated that he felt that most of the problems on the psainsuia with fireworks. is generated by transient eraffic - Anchorage and tourists from the Lover 48. If they are UMNSTe of the ban on use, but see vendors selling fireworks they Will use them. 4 ` .9. M MIA% PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETUG U13 A YY 19 19S asunoSt oiduoateo then use sbyy teveryb dyad the ifact that the it BMg as �y necessary to Lnfringe on the rights of the few in the interest o! the rights of the may. ASSUSLYMEMIM STMMNS MOVED TSE PREVIOUS QUgST%ON ON PUR'OR DEBATE ON THE Valli CAM M AMMW- TH9 MOTION WAS OPUM ON A VOTE OF 13 YES, 1 N0$�6 To N hMWaMW voting OYesA VOTE OF 10 90, 4 US Crawford, A$SPAlbLYMDID1rR STEPHENS MADE A MOTION TO AMEND CORD. 65•4 (888T. 3) '. SECT. 10.18.OZ0� DESIGNA?E iNMA PARAGRAPH AS A' ADMIG PARAGRAP� "3. ONE. !or the 1985 season only, sales Wouid be allowed frog Jute o July S ." Mr. Sewall and Mr. Skogstad spoke in favor of the amendment al; it transient venddoorlow s &@ tho selling period couo 8011 ld only be me week. age 8 cDate tiioon 1asked 10 030 would,stillthat if bite the useeoof ftraawosrkkss for sale if tbare were a high ties danger. This was coafismed. gets@ during t1ws ��a�ed to the "eta wit►dor" with allowing s aCeont�&ad if dthhiisst Wn so hhe appeared prefe ed 1 this t be included. 8o felt the vendors should be allowed to deplete their inventories. Tol9votiW Mhos ADOPTED ON A VOTE OP 11 YES, 3 901 Mullen, Moore Mr. Moore expressed s�pp for the Glick amsadmsnt because he was Opposed to ing ths�tfinancial interests of a few vendors as eospased to t9rop WW rights of peninsula residents. He and Sewall "pressed regret that tbare Wasn't provision for Winter -ties displays. M Q= A1ffiIDMW WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 11 YEB. 3 N0s Yeah, Crawford and Hasshm No. ASSEMB M OM HASH MOVED 10 A1lM SECTION 10.18.030. SUBSECTION C. ADD "M MAYOR TO APPROVE" APTER "AViBMZE". THE AMENDMENT WA� ADOPTED U ORANUMS COMM ASSEMBLYlD!lM SUPHE[/S MOVED THE PREVIOUS QUESTION ?0 LIMIT DEBATE. THE MOTION WAS UPHELD ON A VOTE OF 9 TM S NO$ Mesh. Valli, Sewall. M CA= and Skogstsd voting No. THE MOTION TO ENACT ORD. 85-4 (SBST. 3). AS A MNDED. WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 10 YES, 4 001 Nash, Crawford. Carey and McGahaa voting NO- W" - 10 - IJ - - -- - - - - k- - - -- --- - -- --- — - - -- - i I Mg PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEM%NG M- M-A y- 19. 1985 ASSEM I EMBER MC GAIAN MOVED FOR RECOI)SIDERATION Of ORD. 85-4 (SBST. 3). AS AMENDED, AT THE KAM S, 1985 ASSEMBLY MEETM- "Setting an Advisory Vote of the osou ti atorate on the Sale and Use of Firworke Within the Ream Penisuula Borough" (Sewall) Mr. Ton Incisor addressed a recomendatioa that some of the 4-point options be deleted from impugn in the regolutioa. Me felt the only two things that should be included on the ballot was either 1) a total ban on sale and use of fireworks within the Boro116h, or 2) No ban on the sale and age of ftrarosks. Mrs. MaOahan advised that Mr. March and Mr. Pepper had asked her to speak for then, conveying that thep are in favor of the resolution. but would like to see optima 2 and 3 deleted. ASSDZLYlIlwn SEWALL MOVED TO AMEND SECTION 2, STRUM ITEM 3, AND RZMIMBE = TMM 4. AS ITEM 3. ASSDOLli�ER SROaSTAD MOVED TO AMEND SECTION 2 ITEM 2.1 STRIKE AR�ER IJINA.-b,@Ws the � of My months and OctoKey berr"".w� October 31" that wouldkhan spokarlAga�t gmlmt the him f�tAda fes"arring an gsnds�ent THE MOSTAD AM)SMDM M WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 9 YES, .s MI Nash, Wails, Motion, KdMd o and Johnson, voting No. ASSEKBLYM MB CAAEY MOVED TO AMEND SECTION 2., STRNM ITD( 2., AS AIlzO LADED, AND UNIAlgENCINO ACCOI DtIKILV. Mr. Crawford and Mr. Segall spoke againpt the Cars smatdomt, as the options Taft would be a total ban or so ban. no said the public aboti14 have the opportunity to haeia partialuban or a time of year wban the firs danger to property TIE CAM AMEND T FAX= ON A VOTE OF 10 90, 2 US Carey and Glick voting Yu. TIE SEWALL Annmu fT STRUM POUT 3. IN SLCTiON 2. WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 12 YES. 2 Mbs Nash and MaOshaft voting No. ASSDIILYMDDER SWA LL ASKED UNANIMOUS CONSENT FOR ENACTUM OF RES. 85-27. TEE WAS OBJECTION. MOLVMN 65-27, AS AMENDED, 12 YES. 2 MOs Nash and Johnson voting No. ASSFJlaL CiAVNw MOVED TOR ADJOURM M OF TIL BODY AT 11:00 P.M. TIE MOTION WAS FAILED ON A VOTE OF 7 TO, 6 Mo Mullen, MaOsban, Dale, Johnson, Stephens, Skogstad voting Nos Sewall excused for the rmiaiuder of the seating. Free. Dissiak recognized Kra. Batty Warren for a brief annoanaement to the Assesply. She invited assssibivsambers, the mayor end his administrative assistant to attend a &vnewon at the Kenai Senior Citizens Center at noon. March 19. (b) Ord. as-6 "Atsuding KPB 2.40.100 C to Provide borough Resource Development Co®isaioa to Serve ae 0verall Economic Development Program Committee for the Purposes of Maintaining Eligi- bility for Assistance Under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965" (Mayor) - 11 - Mal PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1985 public hearing was opened and subsequently closed on Ord. 85-6, as there was no public testimony. ASNgZM� � � �K XDVED ENACTMENT OF ORD. 65-6 AND ASKED UNANIMOUS i J. %NTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES (a) Ord 8 "Ap1rooppriating and Authorising the j s o $100,900 of Borough Funds to . Proceed Through the Construction Documents and Construction snspection Phase of Archittatural Services for the Renovation of the Homes Former High School (To a Junior High) and Homer Middle Salwol (To on Elementary Facility)" (mayor) pPWLL%C � 0 FOOIR MMARCK RCCH119F� ASKED UW%NODUS%NTRODUCT%ON Of CONS8NT9, SETTI!)G TEE Hrs. Heathen expressed concern regarding the expenditure of $100,900 for renovation and the reasoning why there used be a renovation at all. Mr. Hakert stated that there Ave of minor items that have eaanmulated. He advised that the pool is one of the areas being -addressed at the high school, there are electrical problems In the , middle school, asbestos problems that have been discovered, and carpet replaosa ip (normally maintenance item bids, but since there is to be a project, inaorPorsted here). ASSEMBLYMEMBEA MC CUM ASKED UNAM MODS CONSENT TO POSTPONE ORD. 85-9 TO CONSIDERATION AS THE LAST ITEM 09 THE AGENDA. 1 - Assemblymember Dale stated that the Public Works Committee bad mat with Mr. HAkert and had been advised that the achrmstics would be available by the March 19th hearing date. The Co®ittu would then give a report to the Assembly on the date, ;. Mr. Skogstad spoke against the amendment, stating that with receipt of infosmation from Public Works Director Hekart prior to hearing i data, 3-19-SS, these should be sufficient time to consider the infometion. pawliafrm Homer against i piticpoaga� he dOr chi at the hearing data. THE MC CARO MOTION TO POSTPONE INTRODUCTION OF ORD. 85- 9 WAS DEFEATED ON A VOM Of 12 NOr 1 YES; MCaahan voting Yes. Me Carey porad a question r�e�ggaarding. Ora . 855-9,S ct�&*. egaa "appropriation shall be roiaiussed rding stated that this section may be inappropriate. Hs raid that at this time, point and he assumed that there Would not be bond issue from the Borough or School District. Hr. Crawford stated that if the renovations come to a certain range - It was his understanding that the project would have to go to a bond Proposition on the ballot. THE MOTION you IPMWCTI09 OF ORDINANCE 85-9 WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 12 YES, 1 $01 Haab= voting No. (b) Ord. 85-10 "An Ordinance of the Kenai peninsula r ska, providing for the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds of the Central Kenai Peninsula Hospital Service Area Of the Borough in Exceed Aggregate .000 Principal o Provide Funds Ofgot to Refund Certain Outstanding General Obligation - 12 - 0 I MAt ?ENNINS LA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REOM AR WING MBRUARY 19. 1985 taoils o! Such Bona and d Service AuehorizninS TTheir S&Ls" (Mayor) ASBE!lBI.YMEMBER MC am MOVED POR INTRODUCTION OF M. 85-10 .SETTING B:AiMG FOR MARCH 19 AND ASRED FINANCE DIRECTOR QTON FOR eR81J1NATION OF THE iffd. Mr. Berton explained the 89,000,000 fiVire was bonds presently outstanding en the hospital sold in the put. They are being relnndsd (relinanaing) in order to obtain a better interest sate on the entire bond issue. The existing debt service on the 09,000,000 G.O. bonds is 81200001000. If new bonds are sold over a 10-year period, debt service will be another $10,000,000. The total debt sesviae would be $22,700,000. tt wee the reeommendatioa of bond counsel Abet the Borough refund the existing debt service and extend it out over another tan -year period which would take the debt service to $13.000,000, but this would shorten the life of the new bonds to four (4) yyam as oopppposed eo tea and reduce the debt service from $10,000,000 to $7,700,000. Total debt sesvia0 would than be $20,800,000 plus cash payment due on the original bonds in May, bs� s the tout debt service to $22,322,000 -- a savings of about S40d.000. Additionali ,the costs o! sslimding (Insurance end set") of the new bonds can be,I=Orpersted into the costs of the old bonds. There would be an approximate one -eight to a quarter sit ia�areass to the service area. 89-18101BLMEW RMS VATSOT 19 1SER9 WAASM O(10T ORD. (a) ftd, 8 -1 "An Ordinance of the Renal peninsula oalwr-W, Usaka, Authorizing and Providing for the Issuence of Not to exceed $6,495,000 of General Obii�alion 8 mvics Area Bonds of the Borough for the Pasvose o! Raising lands to pay the Costs of 8o$pita Construction in the Central Roast Panin- suls Kospital 8ervica Area in the Bosoagh oxen` Details of Ssid Bonds. Providing for the fors end Noun of Sale of said Roads, and Pled the Tall Faith and Credit bf tha Central Renal so nsais siiittal a Area of ehs Bosougb to the payment r (mayor) KC GAM ASIM M OA1 M. 65-11 SET G IMAMINGG DA IIBHAM 19 THERE UWASNO OBJECTION. �pa (d) �e of-8193,411nof Nrooagtbhfundsing the s to Proceed Through the Design Development Phase of Architectural Beafor sro85 Bond Us" NwMliSchool Projects fortIW Her school, Ulkiski Elssmantary, and Renal. Etemaatasy'• ASSEImLYM MU GLICR AS= U11ANlUM CONSINT FOR IN'l =CTION OF ORD. 85-12, SETTING BARING FOR HEARING MARCH 19. Mrs. McM&M asked Mr. saksrt why under the first VNIS AB, there vex only oar resolution listed under project msaageseat for Rope and none for lanai Elsmeatssy or Nikiaki E`lesaatary. Mr. Rakert said that Res. 95-199 was actually a resolution authorizing proJset sanagsment services for the entire proposed 1965 bond issue. Per Mrs. McGshan's inquiry. Mr. Rekert indt"ted that the resolution can be listed for each corresponding project. Mr. 9taphens asked Mr. Rekert whether or not the proposed site has anything to do with this phase. Mr. Hakert stated that per his understanding that site selection was pretty such underway. - 13 - 0 RENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSMELY REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY_19. 1985 Obviously, there would be additional costs if either there to not a sitse resulting in delays of design development,* or in the form of ! having to is -sits a development. Mrs. Valli advised that she is a member of the $slsatios Site decision o the s trimilg cthe Site Coommiion ittaa decided aid met on Feb. m25.e a ORDINANCE 85-12 WAS MOVED. FOR INTRODUCTION AND HEARING MARCH 19 BY UNANZMM CONSENT. (e) nt is 3 a �gh Code oflOrd°inane sito to sfor City Appointments to the Waste Disposal Commission at City Expense (clash) Agg WLYM ZR NASH MOVED INTRODUCTION OF 020. 85-13, DE MING�.IN DESIfI RATION � BOA 020 THL FIRST PARA SPASAAGRAN PH B AND TH[) I DELETING THE A Mr. Clash advised that his purpose in introduction of the ordinance, was to give city councils the opdortunity to determine whether or not they vast to be able to provide or a member on this Borough piatusing combission if they are willing to fund that member. chha.tcalif cities bade the that "ostn ithe Teto bawwere solirdc chocked, powersand that they bad relinquished them to ttu Borough. Mr. Moore and Mr. Stephens spoke against introduction as the Comission had already been appointed (five members) and that by adding additional appointees there could end up being an unworkable numbe4 delaying the process. THE MOTION FOR INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 85-13 PAZED ON A VOTE OF 10 , No, 3 Toss flash, Glick and Dimmick voting Yes- (f) Ord. S -1"Appropriatingo5ikfieBr,a".1ksird.) =ARM� FOR. MARCH 1O= FOR,vCTIon OF ORD. 85-14, SETTUG Mr. Moore rdiindance to shouldn't be statiioon giber first VHEREAB, ASSEMBLYNEIdER MC GAHM AS= UNIINIMOUB CONSENT THAT ' Il" BE ORDINANCE 8S-1S4 WASSUURODUCED BY UN B THERE WAS NO CONSENT A. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS (a) Res. 85-4 "Establishing Guidelines to HA e��d';'-1jiloeatin5 Funds to Senior Citizens' Organizations" (Senior Citizen Special Cmts) ASSEHAi.YMDl6ER MCSTAD PROPOSED AMENDING qn. 65-4, SECTION 2 T® By UNAAVDUG NMOUS ,CON .IN LINE 4. TBE AMBNDI P NAB ASSENSLY!lNUR CRAVFORD ADVISED THE FINANCE COlQlITi'EE PROPOSED AN �Npggp� TO to= IN THE TITLE "Federal Revenue Sturmgg"��PRIOR TO '•PONDS", SECTION 1. LINE 2, ADD "this" PRIOR TO "RESOLUTION", LINE 3 INSERT "federal revenue ebarisg". THE AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED BY UNANNOUS CONSENT. designation Mrs. lhelped Bads 78asstion opposedgeodehe feeling ofhik seniors citizens in the area that it should be a 100 plus figure. She asked Mayor, - 14 - -- -- - - -- - L - - - - - UNA% PENINSULA SOROUOK'ASSEMBLY REOULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1985 Thompson why the census, certified by the state, Was changed from e 100 to 7S. Mayor Thompson advised the State had gone over liP-ree dons locally and made mathematical corrections and had approved 78 AS the actual figure. The local census POOP Want over the figarss and aenfim ed the lipase. Rssideat• Were counted Where they rasided. Mrs. Valli concluded stating that Soof the senior citizens aosmted in the Anchor point fime gure, Wore actually beial serviced in Ninilcbik. •RESOLUTION 85-4 AS AMENDED WAS ADOPTED BY URANl M6 CONSENT. (b) • -i "AnthorizinS the M�aayyor to Proceed arcbass o! a Busrou A9F Computer With Pest h�sals, TsaiuinS +anima Conversion Costs of St. M�i grammer lyan," 8 ;o Two Additional pros. 91 mick advised that the lost amsndmant made, prior to postponement of Res. 85-12 (Amended), Was by Assemblymember Moors, substituting his substitute version. Mrs. Glick stated that she Would like to object to adoption of the resolution at this point and time. %U MOORS AWMW FAILED 09 A VOTE OF 9 NO$ 4 TESf Valli, Mullen, Carey ad Moore voting Too. TSE MC GAHM MMW TO RES, 85-12 VAS CALLED FOR CON82DEEATIONs ULST= SECTION 2.1 ADDING NEV SECTION 2. That a ballot be included in the nest elactim for an advisory vote of the Borough electorate on whether to proceed with the purchase of the Eursoughs A91r, peripherals, $1 miflim aining and the It 86 budget. $100 000 will add is- aludod in the PY 8S"budget. Mrs. Glick urged the body to vote against the mandoant bscause the sU Attorney had ves as istsrpsGtation as to Wbothes or not t�hisin fact a tal project or just capital equipment. It to within the of tbs tr tad within the pusul" of the ��iishe Such as reto eftbor coomaasds- tove of di� owe the mayor's siaomendatioa. y Mrs. Molshen stated that although the A880617 was not legally bouad to pat the matter to a vote, she believed the intent of the ordinance approval of the of the sss�lectorate anddttbaatt spendover woould beta goon od ideas in this gees. ASSEMBLYMEMER DALE MOVED TO AMEND US. 85-12 ADDING A NEW SECTION 4. '"That this resolution takes effect upon completion by the administsatim of a detailed conversion plan.,, Ms. Cared spoke in favor of the m•ndmsat and posed a question u to who Wand decide what was a detailed conversion plan. Mr. Dale responded that Would be administration. Mrs. Glick advised that the Stew -US Committee and the Borough were well on the way to developing such a plan. THE DALE AIS;NDM W WAS ADOPTED BY UNMiMUS CONSENT. THE MC GAHM AMEWNE W TO RSS. 85-12 FAILED ON A VOTE OF 10 NO, 3 TESL Valli, Carey, MaGshm voting Too. THE MOORS ANSONENT TO SUBSTITUTE RES. 85-12 (88ST.) FOR ADOPTION WAILED ON A VOTE OF 9 N0, 4 YF.Ss Valli, Mullen, Camay and Moore voting Too. RESOLUTION 82.12. AS AiSOO, WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE OF 10 YES. 3 NO: Carey, Mashan and Johnson voting No. -15- 7 rlr - -4- — --- --------- �_ 0 (c) Us. $5017 s swatlon andiNsinttss t m of 4 Gaaiwfas Load, Come or belt Carridor, Haul Load and Assoeiated�tilieies on borou Saleetsd and Tateneed Lands and VroVIALUf foorrtthe issuance i 9onid for two pet t3 of Na�ah 19,(19�� ) "Apprevins the cost OaveloOsanC 4d a for the Cemtrs1 fanlnsulA nosEltsi suite AAddltic 1lo�acb amend t4 troaeed with the CoostruoCiom Voauaustts lhass (Kayos) ASSO( ISHILR KC QAHAN MOM AWff M'01 Lib, 56-24. AssnlbLY men SC QARM TO AMP OZOT1OW 2., OLLLTL MZOV. mtxG "which shall ��ssoVIA for the rolooseton of the auras, station to the vicinity of the patients, loops," Sr. Hakert advised the sQsiniterstion of the h000tsl would like to respond to the question. Kr, Lockwood tatad that the reason it was designed im fto pennor was that i1 the alaohoi unit was not suaeosstul, it amid be turned over to ants asra beds. That Would t out the wares station at the end whlah does not pose federal code, l The seoend rosop was hat the aha dcai depandenay patients are aouisem, out of their seeps, sta. Ohtrsss are dWs beaanss ON are rsajuired by resolation, of, KaQahan stated that ohs would still o0!iaistation to the the I unit Lis the eventmds,MrLockwood responded thesof s suiaidal nature would not be housed in the depandeney unit. IN KC QAHAN M(MO M! 1AiLSO ON A VOU O/ ii 10, 2 061 Carey and �. Statham voting Yes. ' vies. VipAsk tad that Sr, sawali had Changed the is91res !n s section I., to O9,il9,is7 total set ted ao�f�stsuatlon west,-i294,192 s% SZs6,33rd dea�aontln� o W O.00o doetuted project Coat 9 LZSOLtRSaN is-12, As AMOM, WAS AflOb'!gD ON A VOn O1 12 YLS, 1 100 i Staahmn voting No. (a) - " Parting pssssss of 9572 Which Wa� s�sa I tie 29 of the Alaska statutes foorts"Ksnssa�o Local Governments" (Via"/Vale/ Glialt/sGLIM ygamp2 UZ �� CAW�l tO1CWstOq Al s.s. LLSOL f= SS-26, AS MdMM, WAS AM= ON A VW9 Of 12 TO, 1 100 Kcashan voting Ne. Us. OUCK AMSO =9 A611 MLY ZNAT RLS, 00-26 W U= AfDLOVLV by �.0 =6 TO 9L MAW AID M WAff S ROG a OML�LLATsoN. ALL soKL (f) - "Stating the Msspbir tesition S ort- V hma a proOsrty Rights in Cotnu091A ► With Studies or It i River Maassesunt" (Olaashan) bsf[ATLV 24 WITS LLLOMOO M. Mrs. mdashen spoke to reconsideration, stsetax that the resolution simply states that the AsSeMblY Will not infringe en persons constitutionally given rights to private property. -ib- bt1, stooge spoke assinst the resolution stating that the mssaure aas irretsvant, missugg as #* stated& 0l a hiss aon titu" 66 Werert atoaai"Od about the hhe matter* �� (CO RUM) 1, 4 tb T o ISMUent arlo�4�'Ko :�, :acid Oats veil NoL� Og A VOTE 9 �fLAt00 A1IMS,,%M,VAVgq MW i'1RMNO UMM LS SAUMti b1LUS NX ii7r�sxogi�'�Ts11a A �gM�G AM O Af1Llc fZi f Al O'l��Al?�0 fAr 00 A VM Of 12 $0, 1 M Moore votiM Yes, Mg% 11 n AWMVand i M AVOPM ON A VM 01 to Uf t 3 000 Cary, X0161 Wford, oft and OaIe voting go, s C Miss;ti ittMoo elosrt Ls stb�s)addrsssed at s barer ts! ,Or . ,,b•0 "Ossens ! s • g gtoal� it, t;,�bne1 g.t'tos�% �r A Ka�o�gfff lot tb! 01rd, #4.43 "AIOOldies"" tstab_ }�1111a Igo Katiion�- s V firs Dery Also to 1r0v 1 r v0teftion fo"t"s And Providing for M LlaOted f0a1d' (mayor) fMNO, TO salvos K. fOgl"NMlljt�_fON_ _ MM=f VZU 1tsOR 1f0'[= WON 1V*Jg"5 a? OM M Kr. Sword 4ridky, Man" �it l� tN lass► OMahw and Ovens, aoo��sared Ad a ir es tat !vs 0 Cook iss i t Cowin Au i y lC3fAl. Lars ndk • t Hirsotor a! t�is ff 0 fiat siso- st e. s ifia Ii id a quasi•goverssenta enrviruny, u the Alaska CMstitstion and • atuto�► �rOvid foteMt dvn and op age 79! bouosta unity in tt�i foCM rou Us h g �o eat, i� sus theme da+lig side il�tWWOLn i p roj ost ! ad Z7 units i g ? k s plograis, 'these p�Opsrtiee ago not presently t ef► �oufs. As a Public a At?too With .tattiteen eeevisien than airs exams 1tr0�s f t _ .. !� tt-- for per to sousing sna Ulu= ".v svo..n...,,,... RWOWWWO Olag what C aas ad in the As.s�ty to do, after Ctocrfeys ,add in gegere to a ao" to develop a Work raistiondhi9 anMi I. Tao /Yb/cMt�V� pr0�lld d 0�_a031aeltI to dw A•sd eeffttee■■��t roe gas, Cr�yy►► sou d ag o to pay M swungto-tun gsrati0ll Ord. spsaifiasii em M housing units in feidovi . and f a 1es0lut shot the foiugh rods a need fog lov-i�a0�s ooudin as in fsidovia 6" w i. t , solo Msy01 t0 L0 J a fetter statin &Vagasds 0 ghe prbJeag s asis stags ahec the purpose OL the prOjea isW�that c s to ao objection to t�s pfoj"tt add that the Chofor L1Lsigiq, iL Goepssatloa ii agreed Its @ssetto than the psOJit as to iat W�QIed. units and the abonowe % m a fros �renas Mr, Vokissv4sesstti ten units • 17 - t .- -__ W homsownrss prORram, the home is owned by CSHA and they sell an interest in the borne over a period of time to the individual home !� buyer. Mr, rrati brs clarified f that 8 ldovta ain nnot WbJoae was their taxing corporate, Cho"ty. pros, DlMiak r"@good the =aging se approximutely 12i45 A.M. until February 20, 7030 pose H. MAYOR'S UMT (a) statfis of solid Waste Disposal Sites Mayor Thompson advised that included in informition materials in the packet were the foroufh Closeifiastton and Plannin Depargmrnt orpaisltsisto:,ftudy, the Li i�atloaCLYS report Oft 8orouSi solid wages 0. am 011=$f P, AffLMfLY AMD MAYOR' f COIMsf/!f Mr, fkofsead thaNad sabers of the public who had attended the hasrtaf of 24 . on firav0rks. Johnson asked that a synes be developed in des! ttaf Mir, Johnson atandrd corrected, eta, He was advised that is was !n � process. T. Johnson also "Proofed Gomm about the rsnasiag of cereals st geeg in Mlorth "net. He also expressed eonaern about a syfen veins in plus to the computer room iA the event of tire. We Dais advised tiers would be a tLesislative Cossittes martins prior to the next sssaOly msstias. Mr, Carey a" Mr, Oste that if whin dealing with tie tg`iaiaturg in Jpnssu, bema�e ao�sp is as tits Chair of Lo`lsiativs Cossittu or spoke• ss to"A Assabt 'e position its iaalude Class positions for rrfereeee bM► tla Msau of, in a totter, Mr. Dais indiasted that he would Iot ake such a POOLCios representing the Committes or the Msauty unless a "solutt" bad been passed, Mrs, altak related that is her "Perience that it was Important to coordinate eomnsnte go CM legislature. Mks. OIL& also asked the finisster ogo f the feats Lisa Litten iai 1"Psator on, the suditce of Jan. 3 to the sri""im.t z Mr, Moors aaaourasod fo s who had not msde the dodiasti0a of the Sm sudleosius go se a psriorssnce at the sudit"Im. Mr Cars advised that as a segbir of the M;enai Fsnissuta Comwnity coils N Council, 'fie Council wag directed to age $120,000 iros their 1 e�aratisf budget endtha t q� ar�atsd a diftiauit situation few thee. 'the Counaii asn find d40 000 glut mq be cut, but to at a lose at -- i auttln the balance of $8 '000, end will not Gut aleesrOos serviose, Mr, Copy asked the MayOr if it wars true that roxlsately $60.000 in costs existed that had not been budgetsd for tbi KW A+s6s;orivm, no Mayor responded that as fear as constipation, the project was within bud et. However, VMS the project first went to via, pavi>1f was put into a saparat* Contract. M Cranford stated that he had mods a motion, *&sitar to adjourn at 11100 pea„ beaauto he felt that the time constraint of i $00 was putttn; pressure on the body and that perhaps it should be reviewed--• VON a a e 8 I and revised to raeove the midnight deadline. Q• PUBLIC � COITS AND PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS UPON MATTERS NOT COlfIUM IN M " MbLY'S AOERDA R. xN/ORMATIONAL MATE ZM AND REPORTS S. KMOE Or NERT lStEMO AND ADJOURMKM �Joitit workaeeeioa With School Dowd 1eb. 2S and Rsgaiar, Marsh . 19SS) , • Date approved 3-19.9s Y ras ea r� 4 • � 1 • r I KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING MARCH S, 19831 7i30 P.M. { BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SOLDOTNA9 ALASKA `` ' • AGENDA- ^^ CC Plas -go. A. CALL TO ORDER l B. 91006E OF ALLEGIANCE l C. UMOCATI0Ns Rev. Bill Counday, Asatmbly of God 1 0. ROLL CALL l 8. VACANCT, DESIGNATION OR SEATING OF ABS1M3LWWZR 1 F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, Due to the attended m**ting 1 of 2/19/85, preparation 6 presentation of minutes will be on desks at the meeting of 3-5-85. G. COMMITTEE REPORTS (a)• Education (Valli, Johnson, Mellen, Sko stad) Nash) 1 1 (b) Finance (Crawford .Carey Feudal, (a) Laud Acquisition/�isposo (Eeeae, Johnson, Moors) i (d) Legislative (Dale, iisene. 8kogstad) 1 2 (a) Local Affairs (Cars, !loose, sste*pphsas) Works Dale, MaGahsn) 2 (f) Public (gavial , (g) iteuai River Special (Mc6ahau, Dais, Mellen, $tepheas, Glick) B. AGENDA APPaAVAL AND CONSENT AGENDA (a) 85-28 "In Support of the Construction of 4 XWW Era I hs Hydroelectric Project" (Dimiak) as Aom ADOPTED �CO� (Moved to Consideration, of Resolutions. %tea 3 by Motion Crawford) (b) Res. 85-2 "Classifying Tract A•1 to -Tice -Lands" 2 AMM Awzcum as Public Use (Mayor) (a) "Ci�rative Resolution in Nesc y of Frank Laser" 2 um (d) Acceptance of Msaagaaeut Letter and Presentation 2 by Price Waterhouse I. ORDINMCE HEARINGS -8 "Rezone of Lots 3 • 8 Block 11, Laubnsr (a) wA. 85 ESection 3 T18, R1V, 6ity of $award From 3 � R•1 to R•3 District) (Mayor) Ord. 85-4 Sbst.03 "Sunning the Sal* and Uae of 3 MaM rss*wums wswsa all Area of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Outside the Cities of Bauer, Raehauaie City, RSSattenxhiie*nnSsidovia $award and Soldotna " (Moore, Glick, w/VValli, 2Mello8� Dale, Skogstad, Sewall) ADOPTED J. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES Z. CONS202RATI08 OF RESOLUTIONS (a) Res 85-22 "Supporting the Applications of the city of 3981'PD from ome8 3"Rachemek city for Transfer of Lands the to 4-2 State for Public Use" (Dimmick) { e i i� 6 • Ji A i • Parts No. {� b Rea. 8430 "Approving Appplication for Preliminary Loan FT, Loa -Income Eldavly dousing" (Mayor) I 4 p9TDD 3-19-89�" (c)aas 8-3reema"AuttorwiithhgtNegotiation e CooktlnlstfHous"Cooperation ng Authority" As AA d (mayor) (d) Rea. 8 ' osa"Precluding gg Ca�iiio 000f Crook Siti for the s PJG=� theaBeaaver Location of an Incinerator" (Glick, Moors, Stephens) (a) Policy of the Assembly for sea 85--33 "Re&fgar� 6 jam . ( (f) Ras. 83.34 "Referring Reapportionment of the Borough 7 AWW As AWA smi ly to the Local Affairs Committal" (Carey, Stephens, Glick) (g) Res. 83-35 "Directing the Borough Waste Commission to —�? m iately Bag in the Process Necessary to Select a 7 AMM As Amad Special Waste Disposal, Storage site, (Stephens, Johnson, Moore, Glick) (h) s "Amending the Allocation of Grant Funds Fro 84-61 by Transferring $60,000 7 Aww ded in Resolution to Skyline Drive end Cischanski Road from Robinson _ , UOP and Anchor River Road" (Mayor) -- (i) Rae 8"hosudis gProj act esment P�TAr �85 o al fut ) to (j) Res. 85-36 "Supporting the Creation of the Anchor 8 WWm _ js/Fritz Creak Critical Habitat Area' (Walla) indeftately L. PENDINO LEWMATZON notggolatths gaddresesd at a (item notedonolegislation tor action mastn) r T = n later�a (a) Ord. 84-43 "An Ordinance Establishing the Rsiiforas56Y Firs service Area to Provide Fire Protection Services and Providing for an Elected Board"(Mayor)PSTPHD 5/7/85 M. FORMAL pUSEM MOMS WZTH PRIOR NOTICE UPON SUBJECTS NOT ON THE _ MEETING AGENDA (a) Latch-Uy Program Propasali Mary'Dsgerstrom 9 (b) Sport Lake Road Projects Rusty Lancashire 9 (a) Rachamak Gun Cinbi Jesn Calkins 9 N. MATOR'S REPORT 9 .(a) Sport Lake Road O. OTiBA BUSINESS P. ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S CAS 10 Q. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS UPON MATTERS ' NOT CONTAINED IN THE ASSEMBLY'S AGENDA R. nVORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS S. NOTICE OF NEXT MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT (March 19, 1985) �f f -r t} KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING F MARCH S, 19851 700 P.M. BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SOLDOTNA, ALASM } A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE j C. IWOCATIONs Rev. Bill Courtney, Assembly of God D. ROLL CALL , PRESBNTo Assemblymembers Nash, Valli Mullen, Crawford, Rams, Skogstad, Sawall, Moore, Make oGick, Dale, Mcashan ;. Johnsen, St bens and fandels Mayor Thompson, Adm. Asst. Best, Atty. Hoedeker, finance Director Barton, Assessor Thomas, Public Works Div. Hakert, Borough Ensinsers Conyers and Sambard,Borough Deputy Clark D ees I EXCUSED$ Carey E. VACANCY, DESIGNATION OR SEATING Of ASSEMBLYMEMBER 1 F. APPROVAL Of MINUTES, Due to the extended meeting of 2/19/65, prsparatien i presentation of minutes will be on desks at the meeting of 3•545. I 0. COMOt!'i"1'Ei REPORTS � (a) Education (Valli, Johnson, Mllen, Skogstad) Mrs. Sandy Millar of the Nikiski Elementarryy PAC appeared before the committee to ask na the comdttes to racoidar site selection of the Nikiski Elementary School. It was suggggested that it would take a motion by the assembly to ask for reconsideration. (b) finance (Crawford, Carey, fandel, Nash) Mr. Crawford advised veprseentatives of Price Waterhouse addressed i • the committee regarding questions on the management letter. ` (a) Land Acquisition/Disposal (geens, Johnson, Moore) I Mr. Uwe said the committee discussed setting up some type of i determine how Procedure to the Borough may buy or acquire land in the future. 1 (d) Legislative (Dale, Roma, Skogstad) 11 W. Dale advised the COlmittq spent considerable time discussing the }4 reimbassament rate for school construction from 502. One would up 1 + the to 75i rats sponsored by Son. rischers an almost identical bill .; would up it to 90S also including a bias in favor of school 4 ' committee decided aving � would greater a growth In resolution inany �suppyorrtt of the 1 t - "I bill. The other resolution discussed was a resolution establishing school I — - constsnction priorities for direct P capital landing, Res. 85-39. He added that sines the ' previous assembly meeting, the Dept. of Education had misinterpreted a letter received from the school district some mamba ago which did not establish construction priorities but grouped a set of schools in. DOE took the first on the list as' a number one priority and the last -as the seventh I priority, and unfortunately in the Governor's capital budget school district priorities are given attention, especially numbers one, two and three. He said that it was a matter that needed to be taken care of. . 1 i 1 a �1 KENAI pBMINSUI& BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MELIT114G OF MARCH S- 1985 (e) Local Affairs (Carey, Moose, Stephens) Mr. service in Stirling, propomittee osed covered give service �tioa of provision and reapportionment with a "Do Pass" recommendation for RReess (f) Public Works (Sewall, Dale, MaGahan) Mr. Swell said tghhe committee discussed with Mr. Hakert the Phase 3 of the oaon Romer 3 iT9 i Cae►Yers discnssite development sidh8rwa' s bLaka Broad to pbe addressed by resolution is A Till the committee also hawed from Mrs. Sandy Miller of the Nikiski PAC regarding the Nikiski Elemeneary land site. The committes concurred with the education committee's recommendations Res. 85-32 was given a unanimous "No" voter ROs- 83-35 was —ended, and Resolutions 85-22. 85-36. 85-30 and 85-31 were addressed, however, there was no concensus reached on the resolutions. Dasisfa the Public Norke Comsittse report. Mrs. McGahan asked Mr. Swab if bs bad decided that a resolution was required asking the Lead site Committee to review the Nikiski Elementary site sslectbiia Mr. Sewall indicated that per Mrs. Na111's committee sport, ct Works was going to reaomind that Mrs. Miller speak foe the Sits Selection Cowlttse. At this point Mrs. Valli, uked that a resolution be lade. Mri. McGahan advised that as the Piaaains Commission bad already acted upon the sits, it was felt a motion would be necessary to "back-up" i:a4 that st it was decided that sack a motion. should come under "0. 0IF E I Bh18 8" - (g) St iienUVOT Spacial pa � ��# Dale, Mullen, r„ �t sMcasbhn advised v sed sat the at ® tt" in la try t msiting assembly R. AGMIDA APPROVAL AND CONOT AGENDA (a) Ass 8-28 Of Support of the Construction of ��sppppt d with R�iCoaslidKi ion aa`2t19�8S mick/Glick) MDVED TO CONSIDERATION OP RESOLUTIONS, I'1'PhD!! S HY MOTION CRAWIORD (b) Ras'. 8 -2 "Classifying Tract A-1 Roger -Tice on as Public Use Lands" tMayor tc) "Cosssasorative Resolutics in Memory of Prank Lazer". (d) Acknowledge Receipt of Meaagemant Latter and Presentation by Price aterhouse Mrs. Dimmlck asked that Ras. 85-33 be added to the consent agendas there was as objection. Mr. Dale asked that Ras. 85-39 be added to Consideration of Rssolutions. Item (k). Mr. Crawford requested that Res. 85-28 be moved to the appropriate placs on the agenda, Consideration of Resolutions, Item (b). ASSEMBLYMEMBER CRAWFORD MOM TO AMEND ITEM (d) FROM "ACCEPTANCE" TO "A,MOWLEDOE RECEIPT" WHICH WAS APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. The Consent Agenda was approved as amended. - 11 -2• I u - 1'. --- - - --- - -__ -- - - --- -- -- - ---- - ----- - -- - - __ -L RENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REOULAR MEETINC Of MARCH S. 1985 �i Prior Co consideration of ordinances. Mr. Veensy of Price Watanccuss refazved to the Price Waterhouse opinion dated Nov. 21, 1984, a "clean" opinion with no asceptions taken With the financial data or presentation. Miss Marion Burk•, want over Price Waterhouse rscossendations and the Borough's reply to comeents. Reaommsndatiota revolve around particular areas such as 1) fixed metal in the past there has not been the facilities to record and properly account for fined assets -- veooms�sadatiots detailed ledgeran Z) preposesnndationaration of bads reconciliations in a timely manner-- rec+ data proosseiag preparation due to sheer voluman 3) self-insurance claims -• reaosmssdations claims should be processed in a timely meaner (Borough states only one case late)n 4) grant voimbursaments -- Just oxbow for an additional position to pr*psra reports in • timely ssnnesn and 3) money floats -- keep may in the Borough as long as possiblel m mudze the personnel resources -- palling chacks out on Pridsy is disruptive. She indicated the previous year's recom sadations had been accomplished or were in progress. • 1984Mtione by the company for this yeas were as of June 30. EI 1. ORDINANCE HEARISGS (a) or 8- "Woae of Lots 3 - 8, Block 11, Laabnar i R-1 to R-3 Deisttriced (for) City of 8avard from Public hearing me opened. Mr. Bernard C. on of Seward, previous owner of the osotiestP to be rezoned, stated that there Max need for the land to a _razoned so that condosin1=0 or townhouses may bs built to address housing needs is Seward. Mr. Real Dailgle the Uarty proposingbuilding on the subject lots, stated that wit{n the gh price oz construction and the property, multi -units Vera necessary to make it feasible. Mr. Sewall pointed out =&moved minutes of the Seward Plannning COMMIsioa of Jamnary 9 regarding the property included in the dank packets for "aablysabers inforatation. /1S8l�LYi�OER 89"m MOVm EmACT!m OV ORD. 85-8. THE MOTmom CARRIED IT USA$ MM COME". Ord, 85-4 Sbat.13 "Banning the Sale and gas of ail Areas of the Renal P•Sinsala j Borough Ontaide the Cities of Homer, Eachemak City, RBetsnpL, Sseldovia $award and Soldotn• ' (Noose. Click, ADOPTED ,Valli, alle8� Dale, Skogstad, Sewall) 1 i ASSEfS1i.Y!lE M MC GALAS MOVED VOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORD. 85r4 I Mrs. lieGahan argad reconsideration and waiting on the ordinance until the October election, Mhen the public would vote on it. Msesb410M-Oers Vandal and Beene expressed their feelings that the Assembly bad no right to abridge the rights of busineaspersons and that the body's passage of Ord. 85-4 Sbst. 3, was a misuse of power. Both urged reconsideration. RECONSIDERATION Of ORD. 85-4 (SBST.3) VAILED ON A VOTE OF 8 YES, 7 Vol Valli, Mullen, Sewall, Dimmiek, Dal*, Stepheae and Skogetad. i. II4T2ODUCTIOS OP ORDISANmEB K. CONSIDERATION Of RESOLUTIONS Applications (a) Homer and 22 achhemek City for Transfer of LLaandsefrom the 0 KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETING Of MARCH 3. 1909 State for Public Use" .(Dimbick) A8SEMBLYMEMBER VALLI MOVED FOR ADOPTION OF RES. 83-221 AND PROPOSED AMENDING AS FOLLOWSt 4th WHEREAS DELETE "a potential voter ly", ADD "watershed psotoctiong" SECT�ON 1. 1.731E 3 ADD "loads ate M the e o o ei t the , Fritz �Crook" A0!>D 61ffi WAS DrSEER ADOP= By Mnft Wavanwe A68EilaL4)MER WALL% ASKED UNANIM= CONSENT FOR POSTP TO APRIL 2, 1965 AND REFERRAL OF RES. 83-22, TO THE BOROUGH LANDS Ms. Keene, Loads Chairman. stated there would be a public hearing at the Kachemak Comm pity Center on March 26 at 7 p.m. (b) Ils, 85-28 "in support of the Construction of Dradley Hydroelectric Project (Dimmick/Glick) Adopted with Reconsideration, 2.19-85 ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED FOR RECONSIDERATION OF US. 83-28 AND ASKED UNANIMOUS CONSENT. THE MOTION CARRIED. ASSEMBLUMM CRAWFORD PROPOSED AMENDING SECTION 1., SUBPARAGRM 3. STRIKE "low cost" ADD "reasonable". ABSDlBilME)D)ER GLICK ASKED UNANDlOUS CONSENT' •FOR ADOPTION OP no. 85-26, AS.AXENDED. THE MOTIOaN�CIAIRRRIIED. (c) or n3aaomi !rd HonsLLae (ft7o" imiaasy Loan ASSEMBLYM Sn CRAWFORD MOVED ADOPTION OF M. 89-30. Mrs. McGshan posed many questions re esng� �ddi��es�ggrreemant with garding the resoluti an presoi- --_ the third WHEREAS. language incorporated in Section 1. and ASBD BLYMEMBER DALE MOVED TO STRIKE THE FIRST WHEREAS AND ASKED UNANDIVUS CONSENT. THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Sewall observed that Section 1. and Section 2. seamed to coneradiat each others hs also asked when the homeowners would take title and could they resell the homes and would the buyers than have to quaacid to o� the pi delines. (The questions were asked for 19.) representatives at the meeting of March Mr. Johnson Save personal privilege to Lon Bunts to speak to the resolution. Mr. Bits. $"rat contractor and associate broker for Totes Realty, acpressed bra personal opinion in opposition to the resolution. as stated his concern that contractors in the area were wcauid of building low -imam housing in the oCsawlosd that this money out of the local economy. Ms. Bunts that the the contract wouldto public bid and local contractors would have the opportunity to bid the project. Mr. Bunts than uked if the project was going to be sold. handled and financed by thermwnt sod that the han �t �i � own tlheir own iota. it. 1►Ss. people cis Ms. Crawford observed that the project was not an elderly project as indicated in the title. ASSEMBLYMEMBER MIRE ASKED UNAN=OU8 CONSENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RES. 85-30 TO MARCH 19, 1985. THE MOTION CARRIED. (d) Res. 85-31 "Authorizing Negotiation of a "Cooperation eemea with the Cook Inlet Hewing Authority" `tea (Mayor) • 4 - J' r - - PENIN83�A�OR000H ASSP,MBLY REGULAR MEETING OP HAM— _S - 1985 THAT ��RMLMONG 8�E IIOMOONBDKOVSD �tWM TO ov �19 , 1985 IMA.E�TINCG= Mr. Crawford said that this resolution was for negotiations an agresiant and should not have the problems the previous o on bad. Atty. 8oedsker stated that the contract was a standard loss contract and voald enable the Borough to collect payssat in lieu of tastes on the project property -- currently, non -tared u easmpt. M�sall��asssend�dis��siitOfat the Contract u the Borough Mayor ThoWsoa reiterated that the Borough is not in the ba"Atail boiet�s fA this Agreement with RODS Mr. $oedsker bad Worked out am To STRW TIE FIRST Wti mus 8Y UIlA1M CON61M. in MOTION 08 11M MUM To pOST1;011E no. 85-31, AS A1hEh M, FAILED ON A VOTE OF 8 go, I YL81 Valli, Asene, Moore, McOshaa. Dde. Johnson and Stephens voting Yon. zsOURiOM 85-31 AS AMEN M, ADORED 011 A VOTE Of ii US, .4 NOS 1<seue0 Moors. Oar= and Stspheas voting Mo. O1< WnW STo AIM M . 85-31 WAS F= I T ASSOISI.Y!lDlsMi NM (e) ssposs 32o=ision o1 tthe lower Crasic the to !or the Location of an incinerator' (Glick, Moore. Stephens) ASSIMBLUEa GLICR Mom AD01lTZW OF W. 85-32. Mr. Don Foitsaa esideat of the Snowshoe am Club urged passage poS. t safety'�B�s bias is adjacent to the heaver Crssk and it Was as 7 suspended waiting oiatcooifs ei tbsii� is isaon sun club ltion Additioaaily the Ipm club is used by local tar entoressllsnt officers in their tsa�ning. There cut the rub discussion Crssitssiitte bard been eeia aced fr m consIn ideration. Rorsver, this vas not so - vomitus in hBes. 85-32 to Assure it being renewed from consideration. Mr. Spal.l spoke against the resolution, not precluding these borough lands ftas consideration for a site. Mayor Thompson urged letting the haste Disposal ComiSAion make the dprebeasenond the CosmsA �,t t could then b voted down.he sits Were Mr. Nash urgsed support for the resolution u an Assembly tudicatioa to the CossSission that it vu not to be considered. Mr. Stephsns stated it bad been his feeling too that this had been taken out of consideration but vben the lease for the Snowshoe Gun Club was being draws up., t{a administration didn't feel that it bad been clearly set out. Mr. Crawford stated that if the Borough had spent tons of thousands of dollars for study of 14 or iS different borough land parcels. if that study indicated that this site was the study -9- --- -- - ----- -- -- -- �EtiAi pENiNSULA BOROUGR AS92MLY REGULAR MEETING Of MARCt� S. 1985 recommended, he believed the Borough should go with the Bite. ?0"11 Mr. Mwpead stated that while he agreed that the Beaver Creek sits wasn't the best sits, he felt it a better approach to direct the Waste Commission to select another site. Nowever, he felt that this didn't capita pessap of a resolution. Mrs. atiok @peke fo= the resolution as an obligation to the public, cotsedtins Wermation which bad reflected the site Was not being considered, *ban in fact it still was. Me. Skoptad asked Mayor Thompson if administration Was actively ssasabia; for an alternative site. Mayor Thompson indicated they had sent a letter to the Waste Disposal Commission miviis a high psiositf -- Ne. 1. speaiai West* sites and incinerator sites, No. 2, Ninil lamdii11 site, and No. 3 Aopo landfill sits. Be indicated that on the incinerator site they bad urged the Commimaiobh to proceed with devilopmemt of inainerator site criteria necessary ction for pprrooppee @eleof a @its. kfpoa completion of the criteria, the Commission to requested to evaluate the original '8 Borough -owned sits@ and through prioritization, prioritize the sites i • to, acceptable as an inalaerator sits. Upon this sp ioritizatun, administration will sslsat three sites on which the Comd ssion will hold public bearings. Based upon public beasinge th* CommissionU to sWce a Irso Son to administration of to Which site is the most favorable location. fir. 8kto tad asked the Mayor it private or State lands bad been aonsidared. "41 Mayor said Whits thn wouldn't be sated oat, the cost of the isaisarator Would be ;ratter. Mr. Bombard, Boroufb saginesr, stated that the initial feasibility study was done on the U-Beach sits and the klikiski site, chosen at random. Tbass proved cost -affective as for as generation of electricity, scot necessarily proslss�itq to public buildiess. The feasibitiq stnd� was not intended to uVoint a site, but to detstnins cost-$ fectivsaess of sites. Tmeupoa, a consultant did a ataxy of bau)d� of wastes ad distances Within the Borough. it was at toss point the Beaver Creek sit* cams to the forefront. At that point is elms, a msaorandum Wu presented recommending an in-dsOth study of the Beaver Creek site of the hydrology the ;eottcbna aspects. Mrs. NeGabon asked if there Wu 9010 to be Wastewater at the Beaver Creek site. Mr. Bombard indicated two was but it would be handled by the facility and not pat into the ground at this point in time. Mr. Stephan@ asked that as the facility grows by demand. could Mr. Baabard ' guarantee there would never bs say contamination by wastewater there. Bombard indicated that septa$* caws** contamination, and that by controlling input, (Wutawater) one could , control output. Mayor Thompson said dot it awn never be $uarantead what would happen in the futars as circnmstancss change. Mr. Amass, steer of the Wass Disposal Commission, urged the Assembly to vote no on the resolution. The reasons he stated was the defeat of a resolution in January designating the sit* (which be didn't not i indevothte precluding site) and that the Assembly 2ES0LVIM 89-32 ?At= (M A VOTE Of 9 90, 6 TESI Nash, Walli, Moore, Olick, Johnson and Stapheas voting Too- (f) Res. 8s-33 "Reaffirming the policy of the Assembly for *e ge" (Diaick) ASSEMBLYMi'MM SWAM LOVED ADMIM Of R88OLUT= 88.33 BY UNANUMS CONSENT. it was asked if this was ggoing to rapirb that committee mooting dates and times be posted. FWs. Dlmmick said that making care that •6- KERAI PENINStwa BOROUGH ASSEMBi-Y R808LAR MELTING Of MARCH 5. 1985 { individuals have a souses where they can find the information would be appropsiato, not advertising as such. This information would be avai able through the Clarks Office, as they are; notified by comdtta absirs. 228011RM 85-34 WAS APPROVED BY UNANINOW CONSENT- (8) �"Refesrinl Msppostionmant of the Borough 1 y Me Loco Affairs Comittee" (Carey, Stephens, Glick) ASSEMBU D'lIMM STEPERM$ MOVED ADOPTION Of M. 85-34. Mr. Stephens stated that the resolution was asking that the Local Affairs Comittee be allowed to invsstigats the area- Rs statsd that one saber from each of the ggeographic areas of the Assembly to be represented in the 'iftrestigation with the Committee. Mr. Sewall spoke against the resolution, stating that it was a premature effort that may bows to be redone in two or three years. ASSEMBLY!lEMdER CLICK MOVED OP REB. 85-34 TO THE SECOND MEETSit() IN AVGUST AND APPOINT A FOUR MEMBER SPECUL TASK FORCE, 1 ONE go MINTATM PROM EACH DISTRICT. TO LOOK U110 TBE SUBJECT. " ASSEMBLYM M JOHIISON BROPOSED AMEq tx THE Tim TO no. milli1 FOR COBgnERAT=011 OF_ ... " THE AMM DMIR WAS ADOPTED BYMINIM= OEM ; THE MOTION TO POSTPOIIE FAU= ON A VOTE OF 8 as. 1 Noi Valli, Crawford, Remo, Small, Moore, McOahan and Skogstad voting No. ,• RESOLUTION 85-34, AS AMn= FAILED ON A VOTE OF 8 YES. 1 501 Valli. Mullen, Crawford, Sewall, MQabZ, Skogsted and Fandel voting No. (b) t� 8 "Directing the enough Weets Cmission to _ y the Process Nsaessary to Sslset a Special V to OU flank)' Storage Sits" (Stapheas, immon` ASSIMBUIRIBER STEPW16 MOVED ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 85-35. ` Mr. Stephens said he felt egin Hitt Ift impettant that the Wuts Di oral drrilling`lon g =WW now g to be ddiiriateddttoo this S Sterling with all. Siitte. ASSEIOLUSM SEVALL MOVED AN AMENDlD►.lff PROPOSED BY THE LOCAL TLE ATFAZIS COHMZT, STRIRit(O IMI�DIATELY'' PROM THE TZILEs AND Ilt SECUM 1.. ADDING A PERIOD AFTER "CRITERIA" AM STRZWG THE BURI DER OF THE SENTSICE, ASSEMBLE MOORS MOVED TO DIVIDE THE QUESTION. THE SEWALL AMMMEUT TO MIKE "ZflMQ UTELY" PROM THE T'STLE FAILED Olt � A VOTE OF 8 M. 1 Not Nuh. Mullen. 110ore, Olick, Jobason. Stephens -- -. and "sted voting No. ' 1 THE SEWALL AMVMNM TO PLACE A PERIOD AFTER "CRITERIA" iN SECTION --__--- i., Mo STtI>[INO In REMAINDER OF THE SENTENCE WAS ADOPTED ON A VOTE i OF 14 YES, 1 NO Moors voting No. THE STEPWS MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-35, AS A1lENDED, WAS `{ ADOPTED ON A VOTE Of 14 YES, 1 501 Mc(gahan voting No. 4 (i) Res. 85-3 "Amending tiu Allocation of (grant funds row amain Resolution 84-61 by Yrsnsfe=1&S $60,000 to Skyline Drive and Ciech-1.1 Road from Robinson Loop and Anchor River Road" (Mayor) -7- s 0 KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MESTINO OF HAM S- 1983 ASSDMVMMZRSENT STEp=s �� N Of RES, 85-36 AND ASKEDMWINOUS CON. THE f (j) s nc u 7 600 fait 0the rOrMW acy AVOWS" (Mayor) Ag8MBI-6 w—mm SEVALL MOVED ADOPTION OF RES. 65-37 AND ASKED ce(A WWS CON8Eeft. Mr. Nash posed a question " to where the mousy was codas from for the astva 600 fist of road. Mr. Conyers indicated that the construction would be part of the Craft Road project, approsimatsly $00,000 or less. proposed !Greer Road Phhossthe m i! covas nsstrocttiioa �o ear. Cysts ifadscathe odd that he didn't believe so. As there would numeroue questions from assemblymambsrs regardins the resolution and NEA involvement, it was decided that Nr. Conyers would check with BEA and have their representative appear at the nest sunhats. ASSEM INSH R RZQIE MO RD THAT RESOLUTION 85-37 BE POSTPONED TO THE KUT=G OF MARCH 19, 1985. Tot vMON Torowel MOM P vot"sxAAELD 05 A WE Of li YES. 3 NOt Nash, Crawford and(k)hor vsr r �Z"Creiic Csiticaiino the iutAon iia"(Vathe il Nr. Michael "hard, representing the Citizens for Responsible Land Use of Newt, presented a petition with nearly 700 sigasturos in support of the critical habitat area. 'those was Gomm that the critical babitat area and the watershed seeemeduethe Auesesreiyy tbatue� v�erti � �atiibiile. Mrs- Mali! Mrs. Valli discussed possible smendmant to Res. 65-39 striking the fourth V=W. Vhich after discussion with the Borough Attorney, she discovered vas unnecessary. Mr. Crawford spoke ssainst the resolution. guestionins whether the use vas the best use of the Borough lands. ASSZMWW D(BER MC CA6A5 MOVED TO POSTPONE RES. 65-38 TO APM 16, 1985. MOTION TO POSTPONE FAILED ON A VOTE OF 8 YES, 7 NOw Valli, Mdllan, Kesne, Sewall, Moore, Disaick and Johnson voting No. Mrs. Glick and Mrs. Moosban voiced opposition to passage if all vas bolas done was to espress 609009 to legislators. Mrs. Glick stated that she felt there was tim to postpone and obtain additional information. ASSEMBLTMDlaER DALE MOVED TO TABLE US. 65-38 UIDE MUSLY. THE MOTION PREVAILED ON A VOTE of 11 YES, 4 N0w Valli, Mellon, Moore and Jobaason voting No. (1) Res. 65-39 "Establishing priority projects for 4 d�IFT&GOi Faciliitalties iilthin the Department Eud�getrue(Leggislative Committee) Program ASSEMBLYMEMBER DALE MOVED ADOPTION OF RES. 85-39 AMENDING 'POE TI17.E To READ "Department of Education's"s FOURTH WHEREAS, STRIKE TO DYAD 11PEREAB, the AseembWvishes to establish the highest priorities for. funding of projects for the Soldotne Elementary School renovations, - 8 - ---.Rww - a, KEW PENINSULA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH S- 1985 the new s school, "Maki HiSchool, and the Nikiski Elementary 8ahooi, U065 4. ADD "4. gh a Nikiski Elements School (now construction). THE AMS MMM WAS APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. RESOLUMN 89-39 AS AMDED, WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 14 YES, I 00i Crawford voting io. L. pEf( IN MUSLATION (This item lists le illation which will be addressed at a later ties as not"I not tog action this msstins) (a) Ord. 84-43 "An Ordinance Establishing the Ralifornsky Tire Sesvico Ass& to Provide Pile Protection Services -and Providing for an Elected Board"(Mayor)pam 5/7/85 M. VON" I- -- fr/1TION8 WITS PRIOR NOTICE UPON MJECl8 NOT ON THE MEETING AGENDA (a) Latch -Rey Prosrom Propalalt M&r.7 Deserstrom Mrs. Dsserstrom presented a propose report on the the latch -my program. Whits ssssmblymsabers eaprossed their amersthe p, Do hthsO b evoked sppsoow as powers the hooll bu0gett which wai affirrd- Mr. Mullen volunts", to aids Mrs. Dsserstros is quest for funds. (b) Racbsmak On Club# Joan Calkins leftism in the foss of a letter fros Mrs. Calkins Was read into the record, protestins the Board of Adjustmends decision on the Eachesak Gun Club. N. MAYOR'S REPORT (a) sport Lake Road or Thompeoa rwiewsd a mappopsohorting the portion of the project deleGd1984 �md�w1robF:LI$b y tits pnbiie�� a erswAd ativeslic 16-stle" owsluated-bait aonstsuction Costs or other problems- Mayor son bad as per Agbofty request contacted the Uwashires again obtaining a right of Way such he did. He bad not as yet reeelvsd a response to a letter forwarded to them. cops Jubilee suon sfforr thed is pr ie no is Enos gi tins wanother outside appraisal. Kwor oThomoson�rygssenttedhe IM "ay Isiparedusss Brad=* by the Of Role YAYOR IMMISOM ADVISED US VM Of 00 85-4 (SM.) SAM ON THE folU MS "t hereby veto Ord. 85-4 (Sbst.3) "pirsworks San" duo to the followb* reuoms: 1) tt will toms to a vote in the fall - at that time the Assembly will have kwulefte of the desires of the Public, 2) the present ordinance for all =tical purposes, would put Legitimate licensed businesses out of bwineso without a public vote, 3) the reconsideration vote wu turned dorm by i vote 4) the present ordinence would not allow cities, etc. to pnschasa yor display from local vendors, and S) Buicaliy, it is taking a "right" from the =peopIs Without a vote of the people. Stan Thompson, Sot Mayor, p.8. t would suggest to the Assembly that after the publ c vote that the Assembly tam action as per the'deeres of the people." .9. JCWAL PE MNLA BOROUGH ASSEMBLY REGULAR MEETit1G 08 NAM S. 1983 0. arm BUSUMBS Prior to the midnight desdlina, Mr. Sewall moved the recommendation that thai Public Works Commutes and Education Coamutee, reconsider the Hikiski Elementary School Site. The motion was approved by unaaiaoua coxasnt. Mr. Huh raqueisted that in addition to books beans supplied to the a� b�� � • Seward � Soldovia librariie,s as waat looks - This was sppsovdo P. ASSMY ARD MAYOR'S CODS ya. St hmas We Chat o hebestam te.ead !os the March 19 and April 2 MgtIM Mr. Johnson observed that perhaps the Assembly should consult Ho ater' a ectme S, shootiuthe h fwaning ei uewgosokis ids to . NO righht, but it a privilege. Mr. Date addressed Ras. 85•39, stated that he bad been advised that Mr. Oversm of the school district bad fo:aardad a latter to the Dept. of Education establishing pso�er �prioritiss. Yx. Dale stated that he wanted to be aura that tW Land canittes had bean lnstgbatd to aid the xsdbmsk tan Chb to find a sits Rom tbals oath. tad and rr. Date expressed disappointment in the Mayor's ,ato of . SS•p (Shot. 3). Mrs. Iwahan expressed support for the Mayor's veto. Mrs. Glick asked the Mayor it he lad found out whether the Aanai Cantrai Bash admisistratum ware awes of istters sent the third of .ianualy ragarding items to be brought cep to standard. 9 also = aaatioaed a letter isou the Peterson's regarding a possible solid warts site and asked if this had been promldad to the Yaste Disposal Commission. t iniaeu�ationn will be turned cover to stite he OMissi�oa�estigated Mrs. allele advised that within 60 days she will be bringing s� another resolution to asks the ballot ismoppoon fireworks consist o tvo o ided three including a phi l 60"uonai bm d to Ras. 85•27 which rr. !looms requested that the administration n awt in tits Lane with dw gxpm na An Club, = adjtreesant in dw p l s of dw beams to iadlaats the portion of the Brae the club does not have access to due to the possible waste disposal site. Qva _Y� AGMA B UMNAT'1'EAS R. tHPOiIrATIO A r4MMLS AND REPOASS S. VMCI OP MW IML MG AND ADJOWAM I (March 19, 1985) 9es. vimi p.dv. seed thehsmly f tohe =Xd at"tft-- amid be ranch 19, Data approved ryes y„UUMM", wesewly Residentf ATTEST: ° r - 10 - �- I' - -- - - - A - -- - - - " • i OA� OOIATINC. �. � onmu. eNc�u�s, suRVEvoas � 4�{� ZP,x93�, � March 28, 1985 Kbith Kornelis�OW Public {corks Director City of Kenai 210 Pidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 REs SPRUCEWOOD GLEN L.I.D. Dear Keiths The status of the subject project is as followss March 29 Final Plan Submittal April 4 Advertise for Bids April 25 Open Bids ,. May 1 Award Project Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation approval and utility reviews have been completed and comments re- sponded to and/or included in the design. Sincerely, VP Bruce Robson, P.E. BR/lc .J P.O. BOX 4W SOLOOTNA. AK 9BBW 907-gM-4MG m :4, a� •f � " a F ■ • AI♦11OOIAT111111, INO. PAOfE8810NN. EHQINEBiB. SUiNEY0A8 8� PtANN9B{ March 28, 1985 fate 6 Keith Kornelis B9O Public Works Director d "d O1 City of Kenai �PUb1te W01kr 010��v 210 Hidalgo {'p Kenai, AK 99611 REs INLET WOODS L.I.D. STATUS REPORT Dear Keiths Per your request, this report provides you status as to design and construction scheduling on the proposed project. Design Statues Plans and Specifications shall be submitted to the City, A.D.E.C., and utility companies on April 5, 1985. This package will include design of water, sanitary sever, streets, paving, drainage, and illumination. a Construction Schedulings We plan to have staggered construction completion dates for the project as a whole. This enables a portion of the development to be available totally completed by this construction season without jeopardizing the overall quality of the project. Our proposed schedule is as followss Plans Submitted April 5, 1985 Plan Review April 12, 1985 Advertise to Bid April 18, 1985 Open Bids May 9, 1985 Award Bid May 15, 1985 Notice to Proceed May 22, 1985 Complete Water/Sewer Phase I August 15, 1985 Complete Water/Sewer Phase II November 1, 1985 Complete Street/Storm Drain Phase I November 1, 1985 Complete Total Project July 1, 1986 A further reason for this scheduling is to allow the private utilities the opportunity to complete their installations without significantly affecting the construction time schedule. That is, utility companies can complete their installations in Phase I between the water and P.O. BOX 488 SOLOOTNA. AK 99689 907-+283-4219 Inlet Woods L.I.A. Status Report March 28, 1985 Page 2 sewer and street phases. In turn, this allows the contractor to work on Phase II during the interim. It will not be rationally possible for all installations to be done this season. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Bruce Robson, P.E. BR/lc Attachments 7 U •y__ - - - •, _ _ _ _ _ _. 't] - - - — _. _-... _ ..may.. • n • H .Ar A ! W YI 1• r 1, M 1• ,. 1+ B IL C r1c T W L L Y a n n . w I N � L 6 6 t •r '• � hii� � o� t � t d .. Qa `. / 1 w M I i .iM I • ` / f Ab I � • \ •' / f Ir f ^� • V• M / r.r s'• / ` • I ~ �• I � •�/� n O I is r. j ggo •. r .� r. two n I ♦ • /< • W 1, man f / 6 , p «K � •/ • I O •i T�1 � 1 I . i _f RCOOUOt AYEnue I t t ■ s u O —. g� d •� NO CITY OF KENAI FOR COUNCIL INFORMATION Transfers of Funds under 01,000 under KMC 7.25.020 (a) Date Department Amount Prom TO Explanation 2-5-85 Legal $600.00 Mach./Equip. Sm. Tools To purchase desk & chair for legal assistant 2-5-85 Library Const. 650.00 Const. Admin. Printing plans & space 2-28-85 Water & Sewer 400.00 Canting. Oper. Supp. Freight costs for homes 3-1-85 Library 500.00 Prof. Svcs. Print/Bindg. To rebind damaged books 3-1-85 Library 836.00 Rep/Maint. Supp. Mach/Equip To purchase now typowtitor after old one was broken 3-4-85 Planning/Zoning 500.00 Various Advertising Advertising public hearings 3-5-85 Recreation 400.00 Print/Binding Operating To cover expenses 3-8-85 Legal 25.00 Books Advertising To advertise for new legal secretary 3-12-85 Museum 900.00 Various Rep/Maint. To have display case raised 3-15-85 Airport M & 0 875.00 Canting. Rentals To rent portable sand screening plant 3-18-85 Lake, Marinetete. 751.00 Canting. Construction Homer Electric fee for extending secondary line 3-20-85 Sr. Center 416.00 Various Trans/Mach/Eq. To attend conference on long care facilities, also to cover additional shipping costs on portable speaker system. 3-22-85 Police 750.00 Mach/Equip Communications Projected deficit In account 3-23-85 Police 500.00 Mach/Equip Misc. Tuition expenses higher than projected. I /' • KtlMt PLfltNOULA sOKOUCH atoms AnSSL'[ 11=11O F APR1L 2. 1941020 P.M. S0ROUW A9MtI1tHjtATT00 6111LO1114 6OIA0TNA, ALAONA �A0tN0A•Y A. CALL to ARD/.R Nash Valli g. PLRODL AP ALLSDIANCL Mullen Cravford C. INVOCATION$ Rev. Silly Still, North near Casey 0. ROLL PALL United Mothodlot, Ulkiski Keene Swell 9, VACANCY, OtSIONATtoN OR OtATtNO OP AOfinfgi MDISLR Otis Dimick I. APPROVAL Of MtSUTes, March 19,•1981 "Goshen Oslo 9. Ca)S IMS RRPORTS Johnson Seephone ``af tduaatton (N411t, Johnson, Mullen, Oka suds SkeRatad `bf Plonce (Cravford Cassy Fandet, Nasof Pander (a) �eAfaquisitlon/dtspoes>t (Keens, Johnson, (dl Legislative (Date, Keene, gko seed) ia) Local Affairs (Carey, Moore, fesphens) (9) Public Works (Owalt, Vale, Megaban) (6) Renal River special (Medshan, Date, Mullen, Stsphena. Ducks N. AOLNOA APPROVAL AM C0u0N661W AdWA (a) BH, 191 %seirwdle6 f foLasnpitsi.eTt scanidgaheot Construction Funding" Lgiolev, Afire, Cate,) t, 0R01t14= NSARIMS (nave) J. t011O09911O1( of MINANC96 , (a) O��2-1§ "Amending the Land Use Plan for the ' veston fsomsConservaation.to Meddiun/High Oen4iry ,t Residential, Section it, 1611, RtiN, O,M," (Moyer) Ib1 u e M "Approprtateng sod Authorittnll the of Sorough Pundo to Proceed Through the Design Development Phase of Arahiesaturel and Protest Mang- 9 Be tees for the I e Proposed t999 coisouf etnNOoxtSholndghogotsHt chttMynri is) "permwtstenR snd Authoststnthe s91,160of Borough Funds Ro proceed i Through the Design Development Phase of Arehiesc- tural fi wlcoo for the Nov sotdotns Llewneasy ` Sahoot Additlen" (Mayor) (e) "Apppprsoptesteng O00,000 from the Undo- S ued"Sstsnae to Cho North Peninsula Rsasostiona1 Sewiae Ares in Pool Repoise and f Mtotli$jt;a Design New of asiainiFiett lyo< (f) Ifg, gs•22 "Authorizing a Restriction on gate and ss 0Trllrevnrke Dude,. Times of Mi4h Fir'tlanRar" (Pluck) K, IIIII11111Y,MATIIIH OP "990110TIONS In► ��►� 84;2� "Amending the Greer Road Project Agree - sit a naluds 609 lust of Tracy Avenue" (Mayor) /b) 4g- "Directing the Kenai Peninsula Borough gntWe Propagate for the Drefeings of a Hssm done Substanans Disposal and Storage 9rdillsna" INAsb) la► f S Mi !�'�., "t)rgging PAoongo of House Bill 240 By the tu ar ra" IBiwsiak/Okogstad/Kenna/Caroy/Valli) Idp �_�g�gQ "Supyporting the Enaatmanc of House Bill RBD"I:s"se2ing tbo Anchor River and rrics Creak 6ritiest son test Area" lLegletty, Afire. Cute.) 1ef �� RR44 44 "Pnrprassin Support for Osage& gill 11 80hil rSCtdn for A isbertes Business TVs Credit for cApital Espeadicurss Related to Fisheries Besinsss raailitlss" ll,agistev, Afire. Camp lt/ gm 8, 5Z "Tramterring Funds Iran the Aasembly an torals Account for Desl�n erviess to Priority Froleets to tha 1981-t R6 Minor capital Protects Request for N!nllehik end Seward Elemen- tary SehoolA" (Mgyorl (gl "A"Ading the Allocation of Municipal a Funds Providing byY Reeolutlons 04.17 and 04.146 IV Transferring 0111,166 Iron Mysrs/ Occaubsrry, lamplight and Halhoety good Prolsces To Peal Avenue" (Mayan) Ihp� "Reyusattng the State of Alaska and a went nt IV And Oams to Actively Puraus tt►e I'urteitawnt a[ tntereeptian of Alsefcan Selma 0to4a tin the flirh Ouou By Bath Treaty and "an- Truaty Vatiuna" Dale) lip s �gI� "Supporelog the Kenai Peninsula Wc-yprogram Committees and Their Request for Legislative Funding" (Osle) L, PfM0100 ISOIOIAT9O11 (This iten tlgts legistation which Vitt be 8dd1e0064 at a later tine as notsdl not for Action tbie Meting) Is) lard, of-ty "Amending 990 2.06 /srtalntag to Co0use of Aesenbly Mesttngs" ifievait, Dimmiekl HEAR 4116 (b) Ord, 44.41 "An Ordinsacs Eetabtisbing the Kalifornsky Tire Service Ares go Provide Fire protection Ssrviaa and Providing for an Elected loard"(Mayor)PSTPMD TO S/7 laf 000, 84.22 "Oupporring the Application of this City of Nossr and Kaahomok city for Transfer of Lands Prim Cho 0rut" for Public Uaa" /Dlaraickf POTPOD 2/5 (J 7 M. FORMAL PRESINTATi0N8 WITH. PRIOR NOTICE UPON BUBJWIS NOT ON TNg M9911110 AGENDA (s) Presentation of KPSSD 1985-86 Budget and Acknowledgement of Receipt M. MAYOR'S REPORT 0. OTHER BUSINESS P. ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS q PUBLIC CONTAINED IN 799PI PUBLIC Jli4YI6 �DAIB UPON MATTERS R. INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS S. NOTICE OF 09391 MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT (April 16, 1985) — -2 I�0F-JO-/3 carmen vincent gintoii. architect 130 trading bay road, suite 330 kenai, aiaska 99611 907 283-7732 March iS, 1965 Landry & Bogan 642 High Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 Attentions Paul Landry Res Kenai Community Center Dear Pauli It was a pleasure meeting you on your recent visit - would have enjoyed spending some time with you at my office. Some times those of us working in a small town in Alaska endure a sense of isolation from our profession - a sense of needing to hear other than that which P.A. and Record convey. Understanding the pressures you were under while here, I'll await your next visit. We attended the opening ceremonies of the KCHS Auditorium. A delightful experience. You "done good." Paul, Tom Wagoner asked that I send you the attached drawings. Rather than separating sheets, I thought it would be best to forward an entire set. A bit of backgrounds As discussed during the Chamber of Commerce luncheon, there was Us) a design parameter which excludes single purpose use of any space in the facility. At one time however, we had considered including two rows of track lighting at one end of the center portion of the Great Hall connected to dimmers located in the "Warm-Op/Dressing" room with a one-way vision panel in Door 443, thus allowing some stage lighting capabilities at minimal expense. (see red lines on E-2) The concept could be furthered by using four sections of tracks or having alternate lamps on a separate dimmer and so on. But that's why we're asking you to look at it and give us your thoughts. � TJ v ' Letter to Paul Landry March 15, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Please feel free to contact me (or our Electrical Consultant, Dean J. Athay & Associates, 907-276-52271 ask for Mike Kutz), should you require additional information. Please stop by on your next visit to Kenai. Sincerely, ca n vine it gin o i, architect j carmen V. Gintooii I . _ ( CM/bd copy: Tom Wagoner, Mayor (I Ron Malston, Chairman, KCC Committee I Enclosures C .. I ' � I 1 1 1 ! V I . Introduced bys Mayor Date: Sept. ISO 1984 Votes UNANIMOUS Action t.. ADOPM KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH -r1VF-0 RESOLUTION 84-158 'PIC ADOPTING A POLICY OF PROTESTING LIQUOR LICENSEf`APZLIC TIONS BY APPLICANTS FOUND TO BE IN VIOLATION OF BOROUGH SALES TAX AND PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. WHEREAS,45 AAC 104.145 of the Alaska Administrative' Code allows a local governing body to protest an application for liquor license based upon a geniral public policy, and WHEREAS, the enforcement of borough sales tax and personal property tax ordinances is an expensive and time consuming function diverting borough resources from other positive govern- mental activities, and WHEREAS the assembly finds that the privilege to sell liquor for profit should not be allowed to individuals who fail to file and remit sales and personal property . taxes in a timely manner as required by.borough ordinances. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH: Section 1. That the assembly shall cause.a protest to be filed with thF state Alcoholic Beverage Control Board on any and all applications submitted for a new or renewal license for sale of alcoholic beverages within the borough where borough records indicate that the applicant is in violation of the borough sales tax and/or personal property tax ordinances and regulations. Section 2.' That this resolution shall take effect immedi- ately u-p-o-n-7—ts adoption. ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ON THIS -issu- DAY OF 2984. . Arness, ATTEST: ,otcting1woro g, eric VIA-1 SUN*-'. TRIAD ELECTRIC BOX 701, RT. 2 .n�' ' �► �r, a KABILOF, ALA8KA 99610 .a (907) 262.4174 n +' MAR 1985 �i FiECE1VED '''�' March 28, 1985 City of Kemal v Brian Hakklnen F Owner #.Public !Yorks W. - „ Dear Kieth• I am enclosing a bill for my costs on the Kenai Library Addition Project. All of these prices - I were used either by the City Council and or their architects and engineers to make decisions as to which option to choose. If I were awarded the electrical sub contract on this project, I would absorb these costs as overhead, however due to the lack of a timely award to Gaston and Associates this job is being rebid. ... With no guarantee that I will be awarded the electrical " sub contract on the re -bid, I must ask that the I ' City of Kenai reinburse me for the cost estimates they received from Triad Electric. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, s, .y . Brian Hakkinen -a9-y i- e, F, I ,ate I TRIAD ELFr..TAI[. Nan Hakklnen VIMz7Qn 401 IVOV Owner City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street I:enai, Alaska 99611 Attention: Kieth Uornelus sill for electrical pricing done on Kenai Library Additions :stimate given to rough in only second floor of librarys 4 hrs. J $50.00/hr. $200.00 Estimate given on revised base bid: 8 lirs, 0 $50.00/hr. $400.00 Costs researched for telephone costs on project as charged by "lacier State Telephone Co,: 4 hrs. � $50.00/hr. $200.00 Cost estimate and research to install shunt trip breaker3 in main service: 3 hrs. ; $50.00/hr, 5150100 $950.00 TOTAL A1.10 VT D'JC HIS IMIOICC: •?950.00 t.✓ CITY OF KENAI KENAI, ALASKA 99611 Kenai Utility Service Corporation c/o J. M. Covington Corporation 10114 Shoemaker Avenue Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 Attentions John C. Kirby Gentlemen: The City of Kenai, Alaska hereby agrees, upon the Closing of that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement executed February 4, 198S by and between Enstar Natural Gas Company, a Division of Enstar Corporation, a Delaware corpor- ation, as Buyer, and Kenai utility service Corporation, as Seller, that Kenai Utility Service Corporation shall without further action by the City of Kenai be released from any and all liability pursuant to its contract with the City of Kenai dated on or about October 1, 1967, which was ratified December 13, 1984, reserving, however, any and all rights that may have accrued against Kenai Utility Service Corporation prior to the closing date of the aforementioned Purchase and Sale Agreement, including, but not limited to, payments for gas purchased and/or delivered prior to said closing date. CITY OF KENAI By J N asp no i i ASSUMPTION AI;RF MVtIT This Assumption Agroomont in made and ontorsd into f Oft February _, 1985 by ENSTAR CORPORATION, a Dolawaro ', ,•j corporation ("Buyer"). WHEREAS, Konai UtilityService Company, a Doloworo corporation ("Seller") on this data transferred and assigned to Buyer certain of its assets, proportion and buoineco pursuant to a Purchase and Salo Agreement ("Purchaso and Sale Agroomont") dated February 4, 1985 by and between Sailor and Buyer for the consideration and upon the , sw, conditions set forth in the Purchase and Sale Agroomentt and I : WHEREAS, a part of the consideration to be given ;ta' Sailor for said assets is the agroomont by Buyer to assume r certain of the liabiiitios of Sailor no hereinafter r" describedf NOW THE?EFORE, Buyer hereby asaumos as of this data, only the liabilitiao, obligations and accounts of Sailor reflected on Sailor's valuation Data Financial state- v went, which is attached horato as Exhibit "A-10, subject to i any adjustments to said accounts which era refloated in the I Cash Adjustmant Schedule which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A-Z", which ago designated on said Exhibits as the following accounts: Cuatomor Advances for Construction, i . I U I: I a i I i CUBtamcr, 13/J9vice Dnponitei Contribl)tlono in Aid of Conotructionf and Dafarrod T49 Crn41ta, _ Buyer aoknowlodgoo that it to generally familiar 1 with the aofltefltfl ftf tho forogoing naeounto and the acaountinq procodurea utilizod for financial reporting { purponao Witt) roepoct to Boma. In conoidaration of tho I1 credit to the Purchnao Priea dofinod in the Purahano and fish Agroomont allowed by Buyer by ronoon of the aeeounto - _ aeeumad horoby and without ncknowlodging that the latter two accounts ropr000nt auntomor or third party claims or 114bilitiou, Buyer shall indumnify and hold harmlono Zeller from any claims from t3ollor'o auotomorn or their neeignaoo that any portion of the aecounto roproBont advancoo which aro roimburoablo to gollor'n euotemora and/or their ,• nnnignQen. •."aw.w.sww..wu.�i..�ryfonery, In addition to tho forogoing, Buyer horaby annumos I no of thin data commitmonto made by 13011or for purchnnee of goods not roflocted in inventory and eervieoo no yot not ronderod ouch Be of the Valuation Dato no dofinod in the Vurchevo and Bala Agroomont, which goodo and aorvicoo aro '- uood in and nocaonary for the conduct of Oaller'o buoinuos, an well art the following obligationo of Boller accruinq oubooquont to the Vnivation Dates uollot'n obiigatienn purQuont to tho aaonmenta, licon000 and right of way agroumento doacribod on Exhibit "Y" to tho Purchaac and Bain Agroamantl ? 2. .� .i I t as f M . i i as a � , I p � l� n ' 1 � � C�.• rwNrwr�'gvr.s+..a�tsrari:"rrutoc:.ow t a f� e � WMEMINiN � s w i (iil Dollar's obligationa pursuant to its exintingf# gas nupply oontract(a) except for liabilities rolatod to gas dolivornd prior to the Valuation pate as defined in the Purchase and Sale Ayroomontl (Lit) Ro11er'a obligations, if any, pursuant to its 6ortific40 of Public Convenience and Neeosaity and any other permits, franchises and entitlements which arc transferred to �4 Buyer$ • • A-n (iv) Roller's obligations pursuant to those <<'i contracts ontorod into in the ordinary course'' Of huainena which are to be assigned to Buyer but only as reflected on Exhibit "8" hereto. v Buyer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Roller, its aucce000ro and assigns against any and all dobts, liabilities, obligations or Cl41M0 of any nature, absolute or contingent, together with all expenses and legal fees resulting from the forogoinq accounts and commitments assumed hereby. With the exception of the liabilities, obliga- tiona, accounts and Commitironts of Seller aG Got forth above, ell other liabilities, known or unknown, of any nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, all obligations for employee benefits accrued to this date shall remain the reaponaibility of Collor. 3. 7 ;L, e , IN WITN$gg WHBRF.OP, the PArtios hereto have executed this Assumption Agreement as of the date set forth above. "Buyer" ENSTAR CORPORATION By R shard F. Barnes, Vice -President 1 r r 7" /V F0 -- / 7 CITY OF KENAI Vd Capdal 4 4",,f NO FIOALAO VMA:, AUSU NW11 UMMONB 20-7635 March 27, 1985 MEMORANDUM TOs Kenai City Council Kenai Advisory Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: ff Labahn, Land Manager RE: Kenai Comprehensive Plan Update - CCC Architects do Planners CCC Architects do Planners has prepared and submitted a contractual agreement for performing the Kenai Comprehensive Plan Update during 1985. Phase I will be accomplished between now and June 30; Phase II will be completed by December 31. Appendix A - Scope of Work defines the work tasks that will be performed by the consultant under contract. The Kenai Peninsula Borough, funding agency for this project, anticipates finalizing this contract with CCC Architects do Planners on April 4, 1985. This information is submitted for your review and any comments and questions that need to be resolved prior to contract execution. The consultant is prepared to begin work immediately upon approval of the contract. JL /dg Attachment Y 'FJ M n 1 Steve Cervantes i March 21, 1985 Page 3 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK Work is to be conducted in two phases, each with separate funding and each requiring separate authorization under this overall agreement. 1. Phase 1 Contractor Services A-e� 4- S�..a.- 301 M65) The Contractor shall prepare an assessment of existing conditions, analyses of growth trends and a preliminary set of comprehensive planning goals and objectives as described in more detail below. 1.1 The planning area shall be the City of Kenai, and such surrounding areas as deemed appropriate by the Contractor for coordination of areawide impacts on the city. 1.2 The Contractor shall prepare base maps using maps provided by the Borough at no cost to the Contractor. These maps shall include existing comprehensive plan reproducible maps as well as boundary, plat, topographic, utilities, zoning and assessor maps at appropriate working scales. Since the project is an update of the existing Comprehensive Plan, the Contractor will make use of valid existing mapping and analyses where deemed appropriate. If, • in the opinion of the Contractor, base mapping material provided by the Borough is Inadequate, the Contractor must notify the Borough of the specific deficiencies and may recommend procedures to rectify such deficiencies. However, the contractor shall not be held liable for any Inaccuracies so identified by the Contractor. 1.3 Natural Environment Analyses. The Contractor will review existing data, contact agencies, update and refine maps showing wetlands and other development constraints, and prepare a preliminary composite land use suitability map. 1.4 Population and Economic Analyses. The Contractor will review past economic profiles and population projections, research existing • population and economic data, contact by telephone major private and public employers, project short- and long-term economic, employment and population growth. 1.5 Public Facilities and Services. The Contractor will prepare an inventory of functions, capacities of facilities, and programs and future plans based upon responses to a questionairre developed by the Consultant and administered by Borough and/or City staff. 1.6 Land Use. The Contractor will prepare an inventory of existing uses, from a map to be provided by Borough and/or City staff showing development which has occurred since the existing Compre- hensive Plan was prepared, and from other sources and the Contractor's field observations. The Contractor will determine the capacity for growth in all land use categories based upon the existing Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinances, identifying any incompati- bilities between comprehensive plan and zoning map, and the two rid a Steve Cervantes March 21, 1985 Page 4 documents. The Contractor will incorporate land use analyses of the Old Townsite currently being prepared under separate contract, to the extent that such studies provide useful guidance. 1.7 Transportation Studies. The Contractor will inventory the use, capacity, and effectiveness of existing roads, marine and airport facilities, relying primarily upon existing data and discussions with agencies and operators. 1.8 Implementation Tools. The Contractor will meet with the City Council and City Planning and Zoning Commission, and review existing ordinances and procedures and capital improvements program(s) to determine critical concerns and issues related to implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 1.9 Preliminary Goals and Objectives. The Contractor will prepare a preliminary set of goals and objectives dealing with subject areas defined in Sections 1.3-1.8, to guide in the preparation of plans and programs during Phase 2. 1.10 Product. If Phase 2 is not implemented, the Contractor will produce one camera-ready final report documenting all work produced during Phase 1. If Phase 2 Is Implemented, the Contractor may not provide a single discrete product but will make available draft documents and maps which will be later incorporated in the complete Comprehensive Plan update. 1.11 Borough Support Services. The Borough and/or City of Kenai will support the Contractor by providing copies of the most current base i maps and reports, studies, or memoranda relevant to the Comprehen- sive Planning effort; prepare or provide a current map showing private, city, borough, state, and federal government land owner- ship; prepare or provide a map documenting current land use throughout the city; coordinate meetings of boards, commissions, elected officials, and private interest groups or individuals; represent the planning effort by making periodic Informational presentations to • such bodies; distribute and collect a questionairre dealing with public facilities and services; and advise and provide memoranda to the Contractor identifying key issues and concerns related to Improve- ments to public facilities and services. 1.12 Contractor Meetings in Kenai. The Contractor shall make at least five person -trips to Kenai in Phase 1, for purposes of meeting with staff and the City Planning and Zoning Commission and acting as project advisor to the Contractor. 1.13 Schedule. The Contractor will complete Phase 1 funded services on or about June 30, 1985. 2. Phase 2 Contractor Services S� 1 y — �2 c e.....4.r The Contractor shall prepare alternative plans and programs for discussion and endorsement by the City Planning and Zoning Commission, a draft Comprehensive Plan and final Comprehensive Plan as described in more detail below. am Steve Cervantes March 21, 1985 Page 5 2.1 Public Involvement. The Contractor will conduct at least 6 public meetings in Kenai, normally in conjunction with regular City and Planning and Zoning Commission hearings, to review progress and solicit responses to alternatives presented by the Contractor. The Contractor shall conduct a random' sample telephone survey of residents near the beginning of Phase 2, to learn attitudes about public services and facilities, priority improvements, and issues Important to completion of the Comprehensive Plan. The Contractor will obtain the approval of the survey questions from the Borough Planning Department staff, City Planning Department staff, and the City Planning and Zoning Commission prior to conducting the survey. 2.2 Alternative Plans and Goals and Objectives. The Contractor will present interim plans, programs, goals, and objectives, for each of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, for review and comment prior to submission fo a draft plan. This will insure that a range of possible solutions is considered prior to presentation of the ' recommended plan. J 2.3 Report Organization and Content. The plan will consist of the following elements: Purpose, key recommendations, history, - - population and employment, public facilities and services, transporta- tion, land use, plan implementation, and background appendices. Existing plans dealing with the Old Townsite Redevelopment, Airport' i Land Use Plan, and any other relevant subjects or facilities plans will j be summarized and/or incorporated by reference. The document will range in length from 60 to no more than 100 pages, printed in an 81s" x 11" format with no fold -out maps. Maps in the existing Comprehen- sive Plan may be updated or modified for incorporation in the updated plan. Multiple -color drawings and maps will be employed to improve clarity. Fifty (50) copies of the draft report and one hundred (100) bound copies of the final report, along with final camera-ready copy and orginal maps will be provided to the Borough. The draft report may not include all analyses or background appendices. The report may be bound in a form (such as loose leaf binder) to allow for periodic updating. 2.4 Report Review. A draft report will be prepared for review and approval by the City Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, and Borough Assembly -prior to printing the final report. Z4- r -�°, Ito --- 45 had �._- I _ _--_ _ __-- -- - -- -- _ _ AL --_-