Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986-03-19 Council Packet
Kenai City Council Meeting Packet March 19, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS The Kent City CouncN VA tyre imblic hearings on the feilewing Name at their 2-646 mooing: C-1. Ordinance 1117.86 - Reallocating Road Grant . $1.517; Returning $15,298 to General Fund from Road Projects. C-2. Res. 86.21 - Directing C minuason of the Eagle Rock Drive Paving Assessment District. IL Substitute Res. 86-21 - Directing Continuation of Eagle Rock/Tern Piece Paving Assessment District C3. Ordnance 1119-86 - ApproPdeNg $45,000 for Pay. Ing of Eagle Rock Drive. a. Substitute Ordinance 1119-86 - Appropriating $53,000 for Paving of Eagle Rock Drive and Tom Place. C-4. Res. 88.22 - Transfer of $2,626 In Gymnasium Capital Project for Enclosure of Ramp. C-6. Res. 86.23 - Transfer in 85/86 Water and Sewer Fund of $5,000 . Additional Overtime Pay, C-6. Res. 86.24 - Transfer In 85.86 General Far of $5.000 . Contract Repairs of Equipment. C-7. Rea. 88.25 - Transfer in 1985-86 General Fund Budget - $15.000 - Employee Classification Shady. a. Approval of Prof nialic l Srvioes Agreement. C-8. Rea. 88.2e - Transfer in take, Marine, Gramis Pt. Capital Project Fund - $6,947 - Inspection Services. a. Comma Amendment and Authorization for Payment. C-9. Ordinance 1121-88 - Increase Estimated RevemswApp op. In HAS Capital Project - Fiance Ad- dlsonal Improvements and Inspection Costs (kft . a. $51,768 b. (Substitute No. 1) - $153,5e8 C. (Substitute No. 2) - $175,588 d. Public Hsentrg and Adoption e. Motion for Inspection Contract Amendment. C-10. Res. 86.27 - Award of Kenai Musdpsl Airport Fence Repair Bid to SouMcentrai Services - $13,727. C-11. Renewal of liquor LIDOM - One•StaP (OWS Ltd.) C-12. Transfer of Liquor License- Crake Bar; Ceske. Imo. PUS JM tiros, 19ee n AGENDA KENAI Citt COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NARCN 19, 1906 - Ilea PN PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE a A. ROLL CALL �'. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda t, *All Items listed with an asterisk(0) are considered to be routine and non-controverelal byy the Council and - o will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council • member so requests. In which ease the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in Its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General + . Orders. r ". 6, PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit • Ten Minutes Per Person) ;r 1. �Carolyn Osborne - Ballparke '-.1. Johnny Jackson - Cheeple Auto - Insurance {z ._- 3. Skip Somber d -Kenai Peninsula Borough - Landfill Co PUBLIC HEARINGS ag ffTr 1. Ordinance 1117-66 - Reellociting Road Grant - $19517; _ Returning$1S,290 to General Fund from Road Projects. - 2. Res. 86-21 - 0irecting Continuation of the Eagle Rock tagsDrive Paving Assessment District. 1..�a. Substitute Res. 86-21 - Directing Continuation of Eagle Rock/Teen Place Paving Assessment District. 3. Ordinance 1119-06 - Appropriating $45*000 for Paving _ - eliti `mot Eagle Rock Drive. 1119-86 - Appropriating $53,000 a. Sube!ltute Ordinance _ for Paving of Eagle Rock Drive and Tern Place. aa4S VAGM� 4� Project -for Enclosure of RP�p?6 in Gymnasium Capital S. Res. 66-23 - Transfer !n 8S/86 Hater and Sever Fund - of $3,000 - Additional Overtime Pay. P � 6. Res. 86-24 - Transfer in 86-06 Gens al Fugd get $30000 V Contract Repairs of Equipment• (y.ie. s - n ASS 7. Ran. 86-25 - Transfer in 1965.86 General Fund Budget $15,000 - Employee Classification Study. Approvel of Professional Services Agreement. Res. 86-26 - Transfer in Lake. Marine, Granite Pt. (�y� „• Capitol Protect Fund - $6,947 -Inspection Services. - — �vr" 9. Ordinance ti21-86 - Increase Estimated Revenue/Approp. In MAS Capital PrVaot - Finance Additional improvements and Inspection Costs (Intro - a. $31.768 (Substitute No. 1•) - $153,568 o. (Substitute No. 2) - $175,568 d. Public Nearing and Adoption ev Motion tot Inspection Contract Amendment. Rss. 66-27 - Award of Kenai Hunlolpol Airport Fence Repair Old to Southosntral Servi se $130727. 0.y K a _ �p � 0. MINUTES (eo, S 4.1 �1 1. •Rot Mollsblsegular Nastinqq. Mseeh S. 1986 (N�"- from Clerk • �j i. '=a • E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2/ir/06 - Kenai ConteaI High School letter regarding �.610stional support from Five Chief Ivenoff and Fireman . Williamson. :. /26/06 - Governor Sheffield letter regarding Alaska Conference of Mayors. J. 3/x/66 - E. Wunnicke letter regarding T. Wagoner s appointment to Kenai River Special Management Area 0 Advisory Based. 4. 3/7/06 - A. Marrou Letter regarding T. Wagoner's j appointment to Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board. F. OLD OUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Dille to be Ratified Gd. . Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 Addition of : p"Ordinance 1120-06 -Amend KMC Title 20 - gy. Chapter 20.10 "Advisory Transportation Committee" and 1 Repeal of KMC 11.10 "Advisory Harbor Commission". 4. *Ordinance 1122-06 - Repeal A Re -Enact KMC 12.30 "Alarm Systems" S. Discussion - Vacation of Right -of -Way - Gusty Subd. /4, Add. /1 - Letter of Non -Objection. =' 44 Discussion - Application Car Grant for Kenai Original ToMnaite Development. H. REPORTS { 1. City Manager 2. City.Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk ' S. Finance Director 6. Planning A Zoning 7. Harbor Commission _ B. Recreation Commission S. Library Commission _. I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (Time Limit - five Minutes Per Person) i AD30URNNENT ' ` A ro� i z it,i ilk r�- o�000�o�ranru���■�■ mmemosommoommmoomm sommommomommommono NEERENEMEM EMOMMMIN mosommommmommommmm mommmommommomommmm MEMEMOMENMEEMSEMMIN ON SINNOMMENIONSEEME ENEENNUESSINAM MEMO E INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. Magnetic Five -Year Calendar Info Sheet Z. 3/6/86 T. Rogers Response to Blue Mt. Venturesq Lot 4-5 FBO Subdivision. 3. 3/11/66 T. Rogers response to Lottie Edelman, Fisherman!s Packing - Lot 1, Kenai Spit Subdivision. 4. Kenai Community Library - February Monthly Report f +8 5. 3/5/86 - "Investors Daily" article regarding Diamond Shamrock. 6. 3/11/86 - Beautification Committee Minutes 7. 3/14/86 - R. Ernst Memorandum to Council regarding Updates on Float Plane Facility and Master Plan Update. - - -- — 8. 1986 Construction Projects Statue Report ` _s 44 r CITY • •Od e�6t n+arr MMUM Wuu.ALAM M" March 11, 1986 Mr. Johnny Jackson Garrison Corporation d/b/a Cheepie Auto P.O. Box 527 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Res Insurancep Airport Terminal Rental Space Dear Mr. 3ackeons As we previously notified you in our letter of January 13, 19869 your insurance policy places you in default of your lease. You are currently only carrying one-half of the liability insurance ® which is required under the terms of your lease with the City of Kenai. In order to resolve this deficiency, I have placed Cheepie on the Council agenda for the March 199 1966 meeting. I have scheduled Cheepie as "Persons Present to Be Heard". If you cannot appear on that date, I would ask that you notify this office, immediately, in writing. I again went to make it clear as we did in our previous notice to—= quit the premises, that unless this problem is resolved within .. thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, the City will require y that you quit the promisee. All other car rental agencies are currently carrying the required amount of insurance. Under FAA F regulationet the City is not allowed to treat individual lessees differently from other lessees. To do so places the City of Kenai in conflict with the FAA. Accordingly, I am asking you to have this matter straightened out as soon as possible, but no : ;4 later than within thirty (30) days from receipt of this letter. Sincerely - a�- CI,jY..K AI m g re - City Attorney TR/cl f :- R 0 CITY Od ea 21OFMA ao MM,au►eK► ten, „ . TRONONQ2I7.7US :4 ' s A March 14, 1986 ". Mr. Chris Keller Pioneer Title 110 South Willow Street Suite 106 Kenai, Alaska 99611 n - Re: Litigation Report - Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfill Section 369 Kenai, Alaska Dear Mr. Keller: Please prepare a litigation report for the property described 0 below and shown on the attached map. N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 6 North, Range 12W9 Seward Meridian, Kenai, Alaska. Also attached is a packet of materials which relate to uses of the site as a landfill. I hope that these are helpful in "f explaining some discrepancies -- one of which is the lease the " State gave the Borough for the shaded area in the lower left hand corner on the attached map. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, ---_--__--.- -- _ -- _ ---_ .OP i. N-r =: sv tim Rogers - • City Attorney TR/olP a Aft Attachments l r SECTION 38 1 � .e [ .. ,. • �� F� -�•YJ�rMiM."�ra,vse-l.Ytu!�0.e_. a- ....�..._c, O G • /.i MEMORANDUM FRO Rogers, City Attorney ty of Kenai TOs Planning 6 Zoning Commission City of Kenai OATEs March 12, 1986 REs Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfill A partial history of the land transfers involved with this piece of property is set out in the attachment designated Exhibit A. It would appear that a title report could be helpful in discerning exactly what has gone on with this property and who has what interest in specific sections. A summary of the discussions and ordinances relating to the landfill can be found in the attached packet entitled "Summary" prepared by Janet Loper, attached hereto as Exhibit Be The operative instrument in this case is City of Kenai Ordinance No. 233-73 which granted an easement in the solid waste disposal site. The easement purports to give the Borough carte blanche to operate the landfill on those lands designated in the easement as they saw necessary without a durational limitation. The City would be in a week position if it attempted to terminate the easement through any of the traditional methods, i.e. ouster, unity of title, abandonment. Should the City desire to terminate the use of the facility, there appear to be two methods which might accomplish that goal. 1) if the Borough were unsuccessful in securing a permit to operate the facility after January 1, 19879 this would prevent n further use; and 2) The City might be able to terminate the use a in light of the fact that it is a prohibited use situated in a rural residential zone for which no conditional use permit or variance has been granted. - PERMIT ISSUES On February 5p 1986, Nowlend Sambard, professional engineer for +� the Borough, completed an application to the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation to renew the existing �- permit No. 81-20-BA-010 (as amended), which allows the operation o of the landfill facility. I do not know if this has been filed '.•A with the Department yet. - - - - - ---- m The application for renewal basically follows the procedure for -Qua applying for a new permit. Mike Luckey from DEC informs us that the procedures for the DEC require posting a public notice of the Q application for renewal and if there is response to the public notice, a public hearing will be held. These procedures are found in 18 AAC 15.050-.060. A representative of the City would . be advised to be present at such hearing to protest the continued use of the landfill. In protesting the permit renewal, the City would be advised to ;.wt raise past violations of the general requirements for disposal sites. These protests could include (given evidence), but would not necessarily be limited to: :.-14 1. Surface water running over or through uncovered solid waste. 2. Solid waste placed such that it enters into surface water. z . ' 3. Leachetes and eroded soil from the landfill which o- violates standards for surface water quality in 18 AAC 70 outside the site's boundary. 4. Disease vectors have become a nuisance or a hazard to health from the landfill. 5. Birds are attracted to the site and become hazards to - aircraft. -. 6. Wildlife and domestic animals are attracted to or are.,;,; allowed access to the deposited solid waste. 7. Public access to the site is not controlled to minimize health and safety hazards. V. 2 :..: . ice. .. - .. . .. Agh (� 8. Oust, odors. and other activity is affecting local residents and becoming a nuisance or a hazard to health i safety, or property. 9. Litter is not being kept in by fencing or other approved means. 10. Access roads in nearby land are not being kept free of litter or windblown solid waste. 11. Salvaging of the area if allowed, is hindering site operations or creating a safety hazard or nuisance. 12. Access and on -site roads are not being kept passable and safe for vehicles during normal hours of operation. -- - =-- Other more technical objections could be found under 18 AAC , 60.045 relating to engineering specifications such as a finished lift height or operational cover. Once a decision is made o pursuant to 18 AAC 15.080, then the City would have thirty (30) _ days after service of that decision to request an adjudicatory ° hearing, if the decision were adverse to the City. This is provided for in 18 AAC 15.200. It should be noted that under 15 - AAC 15.210, the decision of the Commissioner would not be stayed and the landfill would be allowed to continue in operation. If the City did not prevail in the adjudicatory phase, then there would always be, of course, an appeal to the Superior Court and on up. This is obviously a long and arduous trail and the City should accordingly think long and hard about just what it would desire to do and what effects there may be upon the City. NON -CONFORMING USE Steven Cervantes, Senior Planner for the Borough, seems to be in — - agreement that the landfill to located in a rural residential zone and is presently considered a non -conforming use. In a �.a.., memorandum to Nowlend Sembard, attached hereto as Exhibit C, he sake what steps would be necessary to bring the landfill into conformance and arrives at the conclusion that the City would 4 have to change the Code to allow landfills in the rural residential zone, or the Kenai Peninsula Borough would have to apply For a variance. Another issue that Mr. Cervantes addressee - - - - is whether the Borough has any "grandfather" rights to use the entire site, but he defers this question to the Borough Attorney - --- - for a legal opinion. • 3 1 U I � , I" An initial question relates to classificatio-, of the use. The a: commonly accepted definition of a non -conforming use is, "A use that lawfully existed prior to the enactment of a F zoning ordinance, and which is maintained after the effective date of the ordinance although it does not comply with the use restrictions applicable to the area in which it; Y is situated." Anderson American Law of Zoning §601. .;....� In this case, the zoning of the area was rural residential as ° early as 1966. Some time between 1966 and 1973, when the City q finally gave the easement to the Borough, the City used the k...••.. landfill as its own. At this time, I unable to determine exactly - ------ when the use as a landfill first started. If the landfill started prior to 1966, then it might be said that there to a non -conforming use because it would have lawfully existed prior r` f to the enactment of the 1966 zoning ordinance. What is clear is that in 1973 the City gave the Borough an easement to operate the landfill. At that time, the use wee �. illegal. One could argue that the City extinguished its use of `-> the landfill thereby voiding any possibility that there was a t;..E_ . s...•, ,, non -conforming use, then allowed the Borough to maintain an illegal use after 1973. :. No permit or variance was given for the landfill. If the City attempted to enjoin the use of the landfill as an illegal use, .;.» '. ��. the Borough would obviously raise the spectres of estoppel and lachea. As we have just recently discussed in the Jackson case (which is an appeal in the Supreme Court), lachea is probably not an available defense however estoppel g provide a viable -- r Peel might ..•... r ��.:.. argument. CI To maintain an estoppel argument, the Borough would only need to suggest that the City19 granting of an easement was tantamount to u..: :.. an action upon which they relied in developing the landfill and now the City should be estopped. P g In the alternative, if the Borough can establish a non-conforming use, the question becomes whether enlargement of the landfill would be in violation of that non -conforming use. It hoe been held that the establishment of a non -conforming -,- - u ' onforming use on one lot does not authorize a change of location in the establishment of the use on another lot. Bianchi v. Commissioner of Public ---�_--;�-- { Buildings, 181 NE 120 (19 2), see also Anderson, t6.36. Kenai -- ---- ;, .`.. Municipei Code 14.20.050 specifically prohibits enlargement of non-conforming uses. In the instant case, the record seems to indicate that the .. �: lye•'='-�`".�� �.- . Borough wants to open cells in a differ P ant lot. Accordingly, theo � City could move to enjoin this activity so an expansion to a ►r: s':�.rV - different lot. 4 ' � 1 .13 u �• o v 6 0 X It has s also generally been held that the right to continue a non -conforming use does not include a right to extend or enlarge ° it, (Anderson cites a multitude of cases under 66.42) and this appears to be the rule whether or not the municipal corporation has adopted an ordinance which specifically limits the right of a non -conforming user to enlarge or extend his use. The courts f have consistently disapproved disc f° extensions of non -conforming uses �11. which involve use of new land on a lot other than the one occupied by the original non -conforming use. This result has - '= been reached where the land in question was acquired before, as well as after enactment of a restrictive ordinance. Anderson §6.48. There are numerous quarry and gravel pit cases in which ,v courts have enjoined expansion onto other land. sue. While we find no specific cases regarding landfill expansion, the cases seem to indicate that any expansion onto a different lot, as in gravel pits, could be enjoined. The landfill here is very similar, in fact it was a gravel pit at one time, and now they seek to expand onto different lots. Accordingly, an - Injunction might be issued, but certainly not without a protracted legal battle. .s SECTION 38 i NWk. NEk sec. 36 City grants easement to this area to Borough in 1973 • NWk,NWk„tEk , SN,NEk.NWk,NEk sec. 36 State leased this area to Borough in 1975 to 1980. How or why is not clear. State DEC permit issued in 1981 for this area. 1985 Reapplication includes same area. 0 SWk , NWk, NEk, sec. 36 • In 1977 State gave Borough a special use permit for this area. F C "T CITY OF KENAI ea 0J 44t a • ; . 21C ROALOO KENAI. ALASKA 99611 TELEPNONE283.7836 RENEWAL OF PERMIT AND REQUEST FOR EXPANSION Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfill Summary Below to a chronological summary of activities concerning the Borough Landfill. Further, material sent to Councilman John Wise from Mr. Sam Beet, Kenai Peninsula Borough Administrative Officer, sent by permission of Councilman Wise. Additional material will be available at the meeting. Please be sure to bring your bluelines and copies of submittal letter and permit to the meeting on 2/26/86. 1. 10/3/73 Ordinance 233-73: Transferring Garbage -Refuse Use Collection and Disposal Power to Kenai Peninsula Borough and Other Changes in Code Title 9. 2. 1/21/61 (3Of*02 gbbfffaMn 81-14: Rescinding the Special Use Permit to the State for Land Use Site 3, 2/18/81 Discussion by Council: Phil Waring of the Borough states intent is to continue present use, no other use intended. 4. 1/20/82 DEC renews permit for 5 years - Administration asked to formally protest 5. 2/5/82 Letter of protest written to DEC - no reply 6. 2/17/82 Discussion by Councils a. No reply from DEC. b. Disposal of sludge requested by the City of Kenai to the Borough 7. 7/18/84 Resolution 64-601 Support of Kenai Peninsula Borough Incinerator Project with Stipulations ff 8. 1/2/85 Resolution 85-03: Rescinding Resolution 84-00 660 ..Opp 946.pim ow r _Y� � 6 Landfill Summary Page 2 `. 9. 6/5/85 Report to Councils Notice of expiration of permit of Landfill December 1986 - copy of letter of.; protest sent to Borough 10. 8/21/85 - Council Meetings Persons Present Scheduled to be Heard - Dave Brown regarding waste material dumped at the landfill - subsequent request for adminis- tration to query Borough 11. 9/4/85 Council Meetin-a= Mayor's Report - After discussion with the Borough Council directed administration to draft a resolution indicating a lack of confidence in the Borough Administration regarding handling of solid wastes and "file a complaint to EPA" regarding dumping of oil 12. 10/2/85 Resolution 85-941 Expressing Dissatisfaction with the Borough's Handling of Waste Materials pop ..does.. fah.... .... o� M P KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH <. { BOX 980 • SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 09669 P"ON6 262.4441 CON OILMAN MEMORANDUM * .. 441 TO: Nowland Bambard -. THRU G. S. Best, Administrative Officer FRO Stephen Cervantes, Senior Planner gj C - - - - DATE: July 25, 1984 SUBJECT: Kenai Landfill This is a response to the questions raised in your memo on the Kenai Landfill. 1) Is the landfill in conformance with zoning in the City of Kenai? ® No, the landfill is located in a Rural Residential zone and is presently considered a non -conforming use. 2) What steps are needed to bring the landfill into conformance? The city would have to change the code to allow landfills in RR zone or the Kenai Peninsula Borough could apply for a variance. 3) Do grandfather rights exist for the Borough to use the entire.siteZ ._ This is a legal opinion and should be directed to the attorney. _== I reviewed one of the files on the landfill and preliminary Indications are that the entire site may be grandfathered. INDICATORS 1) On October 3, 1973 the City of Kenai passed an ordinance granting to the Borough "an in. T,- easement and to, any interest it may have, if any* In that certain solid waste disposal site, for operation, maintenance or other ancillary uses...." The ordinance goes on to describe the real property for the site as the entire north half of Section 36. 2) A permit from the Department of Highways which defines a JF_ portion of the entire site and goes on to state, "The areamay be enlarged from time to time as material is extracted 0 by the Department Highways...." .> of - SC/ta 464 1l..../9...... Qpm �1T +z U CITY OF KENAI "Dll 04041 ad 4"., 210ROAM mmmmu S:, TUMNONeaaa•UN MEMORANDUM TOs Mayor Wagoner and City Council FROM: Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECTS Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfill: Permit Renewal & Expansion DATE: March 14, 1986 At the regular meeting of the Commission on February 26. and March 12. 0 1986, public hearings were held regarding the referenced issue. At those meetings, the Commission heard testimony from Tom Boedeker, Borough Attorney and Mr. Nowlend Bambard, Borough Solid Waste Engineer. Mayor Wagoner, Tim Rogers, City Attorney, for the City of Kenai. Joe Arness, Chairman Solid Waste Commission. Four members of the audience spoke in opposition to the permit renewal. As a result of the public hearing testimony, the Commiscion rendered the following motions "Move for denial of the permit renewal on the basis that it is not in compliance with existing zoning". The minutes of the meeting of March 11, 1986 will be available at the Council meeting of March 19th. L i ::1 .i:j KENAI PENINSULA ®OROUI ® q BOX 650 • SOLOOTNA. ALASKA 99669 PHONE 262.4441 E March 14, 1986 Janet Whelan, City Clerk City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai, AK 99611 0-3 STAN THOMPSON MAYOR Dear Mrs. Whelan: This letter is to give notice of an appeal by the Kenai Peninsula Borough to the Kenai City Council from a Kenai Planning Commission decision rendered on March 12, 1986. The decision appealed is the determination that the landfill operated by the Kenai Peninsula Borough within the City of Kenai is in violation of the City's zoning code. This decision was rendered in connec- tion with a request from the Borough for issuance of a certif- icate or statement that the landfill was in compliance with the zoning code so that site permit renewal could be processed with the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. We request that this matter be placed upon the agendt.at -Vo e-arliast city council meeting, and that a copy of the a pliaatian and the minutes for transcript) of those proceedings be avail- " abit ♦ � A Sincerely, Thomas R. Boedeker Al it Borough Attorney Fps*TRB1b1 r F 5�1 H Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1117-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, RE -ALLOCATING $19517 OF THE 1980 MUNICIPAL ROAD GRANT, AND RETURNING $150298 TO THE GENERAL FUND FROM THE SPRUCE, SECOND AND THIRD STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. WHEREAS, Spruce, Second and Third Street Capital Project engineering is complete and it does not appear that the City will be proceeding with construction in the near future; and, WHEREAS, $1,517 of the 1980 Municipal Road Grant remains unspent in this project, and the Administration desires to close the grant by using the monies in the Highbush, Bumblebee, Swires, East Alisk Capital Project Fund; end, WHEREAS, s General Fund appropriation of $15,298 was not spent and should be returned. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the $159298 of General Fund monies a ro riated to the Spruce, Second and Third Street Capital Project be returned to the General Fund, and that the following increases <decreases) in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: Spruce. Second and Third Street Capital Project Decreaao Estimated Revenues: 1980 Municipal Road Grant <$ 1.517> Decrease Appropriations: Engineering <$ 19517> Highbueh, Bumblebees Swiree, East Alisk Capital Protect Increase Estimated Revenuess 1980 Municipal Road Grant $ 19517 Increase Appropriationes Construction $ 19517 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAIj ALASKA9 this 19th day of March, 1986. TOM WAGONERj MAYOR ATTEST: 3anet he an, City Clerk First Readings March 59 1986 Second Reading: March 199 1986 Effective Dates March 19, 1986 Approved by Finance:t" 2/25/86 ........... 11 TR It F n:-a« Him 202 Kenai City Council �- FROM: Chutes A. Brown, Finance Director l° 44. DATE: march 6, 1986 80WECT: Eagle Rock Drive Assessment District k: At the 3-19-86 Council Meeting, the issue of a paving assessment on Eagle Rock Drive will be before you. The current proposal is to pave Eagle Rock Drive only. The Council amended Resolution No. 86-7 on February 5, 1986 to delete all other roads from the assessment district. Five lots have frontage on Tern Place. The information available from the survey at 2-5-86 meeting was: Owner Lot (Sun ate Park) Survey Result Dunn Lt 3, B c 2 Yes Davidson Lt 4, Blk 2 No Fisher Lt 5, Blk 2 Didn't Respond Clark Lt 6, Blk 2 Didn't Respond Quellette Lt 7, Blk 2 Yee Fisher responded with a positive vote after the 2-5-86 meeting. I have a letter, signed by Dunn, Quellette, and Fisher (attached) asking for Tern to be paved. Ines Zordel says she is the owner of Lt 6, rather than Clark. Herrick Poore told me (verbally) that he owns Lt 4, rather than Davidson. I have checked again with the Kenai Peninsula Borough, and they show Clark and Davidson as the owners. In any case, the vote on Lt 4 is probably still a "No", because Poore told me verbally he's against paving Tern. Lot 6 either has a "No" vote or a non - response, depending on ownership (either way, we'd view it as a "No". Therefore, you now have 3 "Yee" and 2 "No". The letter from Dunn, Quellette, and Fisher states their belief that since It 3 and Lt 7 are corner lots fronting both Eagle Rock Drive and Tern Place, they should get votes on both streets. I think that argument is reasonable. You have before you a resolution continuing the district and a financing ordinance (Ord 01119-86). 1) If you want to pave only Eagle Rock Drive, adopt the resolution and the ordinance as is. 2) If you want to add Tern Place, then: a) Substitute the Resolution in your packet, b) Substitute the Preliminary Assessment Roll which includes Tern Place (attached) for the one presented to you at the February 19, 1986 Council Meeting. c) Substitute ordinance No. 1119-86 in your packet. a%,, / - . • 101 00 1 1 4 I( 1 1 1 1 T IM� M 1l m fflff M. r r m . =r a r r (A C. C. C. -I C. y� f - p"'IMM Z 1 � r••MMCOR��1~ •A omasR.L- Ro a�,- Rrc arra c toROmC.c" ; -< '. -C I fag a FF14, N N NN ��yy NNNNNN�NNNNA?A r - -- -- - �0 VION- VV�Vt�VNQ•mmO O N �0~ r r r Is Y r r r• r r r+ r r r 'AY Y r .� ��5��21 r r i r r r r r Y r r r Y r r Y r Y r r (0 N0NObWrrrr+06WrN0+WNNto (AC r• N N W r► •+ r a �• r r 7 �•+ — Y �. Y Y �0 �0 �0 �0 �0 �0 in �0 O �0 ri• r � � Y, Qa�i��8 z. .l ' ib..�/ti� `a-n - { •d.�1r... + a �.. .. � a r •'� .. .. ..1 - � ' ' i i 1 r:.l.JNy . �"' rn' + ''-- Ilk— i V r a f 22222222222200000 4 f �0 .Q (��0 �0 �(�0� �0 �0 �0 �0 �0 �0 O) �OOQ�' �WOOQi1WtIZ1W ��44�v�4�4C0'gqOgvO$$�� NNNNNNNNNNNNNNOI4VO�� VOWVO•tJli►t!11NwONGONw dp m O� Al m+ r r -I m r r z Z Is + a R• R• c.. R• +f �1 M a� m all xm Vm a is��c�i a FF �� a a NN a N NN W IU iU A)IU N rk rVV + r r r r r+ 4 .b 8 .b 8 0b W000000 V.4 -4 + + r + r r + + r o �g0000 w f1j r�+�ywr•Nr0► r + r• r+ r r r VGJNNNNN na��o� W •+ 1+ �+ w a• �+ V0,pp00 ONN ��00000 l - ��_ - - "I. - - 4 LIJ N :srCn :. ' 966 To: Citv of Kenai Suo;ect- Paving of 'rzrn Puce we the following property owners on Tern Place parcel numoers 049- 300-03 (James t+rd Terry Dunn), 049-300-07 (Duane ano Phyllis Oue*-'ette) feel that our votes Should have oeen counted along with oo,aq-300-05 (Curtis risner) on paving Tern Place in Sungate Suoaivislon. P1pase note that Jim Dunn's address and driveways are on Tern Place. We constitute trree Q, Positive, out of five (5) oossioie votes. --le asK triat you reconsider ant :lave Tern Place. James 'Dunn Date /-1 (4P-ALS�j�wr. 3 gL D e Well to Curtis Fiener Date r G-astorl 1, l'—r, ') at'? Jimmie vavicson Date cc: City Manager, Charlie Brown, City Council, ano KIStn Kornells :::ru�..,.ii�Jy�: '.yLp:.RYA. � .,..-. ... .. ._ .. ._:_- :. 1.•.�s;�+1>�:�+, u IN SECOND REOUEST f :.��•jr.v •.�• G„ r INFORMATION REQUEST FORM ` • 941 l POSSIBLE PAVING L.I.D. .. TERN PLACE [ 1 I am in favor of forming an L.I.D. for paving my road where I will pay 50% of the cost of the paving only. dF I am NOT in favor of forming an L.I.D. for paving my road whereTwill pay 50% of the coat of the paving only. In both cases I understand that I still have the right to make my wishes known at the Public Hearings. e e Print Ieme �- gna ur If your name is not listed and you own property adjacent to one of these roads, please contact City Hall. Please return in the postage paid envelopes or hand deliver to City Hall by March 149 1986. .P . 4 ill I 1' -_.(V . 44, i X6 CITY OF KENAI %od OapdW ej 4" Mo► NWO MMAi, mow► Ul" T&WHONB M-7638 'v' G•M February 21 , 1986 ,',� - lite,, n &pe Gasto and B y L. Clark 10A pd. " 1 Anchors , K 99501 1li Z G� SUBJECT: LID N TERN PLACE (�'���"• �� y��� Dear Mr.and Mrs. Clark: On January 249 19860 I sent you the enclosed letter asking if you wanted to form an assessment district to pave your road. You did not send back the information request form and therefore we had to consider your input as a no; you do noi: :want the road paved with you paying for one-half of the paving part only. The people on Eagle Rock Road are forming an LID to pay for one-half of the paving part only. Since we will be paving so close to your road this summer, the Council of the City of Kenai asked me to contact you once again to see if you have changed your mind. If you have, plesse send beck the enclosed information request form prior to March 149 1986. Please feel free to cell me if you have any questions. r - Sincerely, _ 11 Keith Kornelie, Director _ Department of Public Works " c; KK/aw } Enclosures Qy 9-1 oo.- 0 6 W j Al k 2� .I4A f Af-4 Mom t 6 o0 10 3 .% use i� �r yes oy9.060•0 Poor g pw %e EAGLE BOCK OR. 7 fool � 0 •.0 rf's ® t 29 : � • � � K � dap- Z~ Sao-2? ? L'i 40O'6- 300,Z& I;bo r ' roe' leer �d • , w r. • t! - --- ..-- -- - L NOTE — Assessor's Block Nc�nOa F ................ I+Mr RPM CITY OF KENAI ,.Ord ea#W 4 4"„ MO FIOALAO KENAI, ALASKA 9 MM TELEPMONE283.7M March S, 1986 Herrick and Virginia Poore 4300 Eagle Rock P1. Kenai, Alaska 99611 f I l o i 1 j .•... ••fit„ _ .. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Poore: - -- You are aware, based upon my previous letter to you, that the City is holding a Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. on March 19, 1986 at the City Hall Council Chambers concerning a proposed assessment district on Eagle Rock Drive. _71 You have verbally told me that you own Lt 4, Blk 2, 8ungate Park " ^ (parcel #049-300-04). I checked with the Kenai Peninsula Borough on March 3, 1986 and they still show that Jimmie and Myrna Davidson own this property. On the survey taken approximately a month ago about paving assessments, the Davidsons voted "No" for this lot on Tern Place. For the purpose of this letter, I am assuming that you are the owner of -. Lt 4, Blk 2. ` wi I have received requests from three property owners on Tern Place for the inclusion of Tern Place in the assessment district. Five lots have frontage on Tern Place. I will be giving this information to the City Council for discussion at the March 19, 1986 Council Meeting. F, It is possible that the Council may decide to add Tern Place to the assessment district. The purpose of this letter is to give you notice ;j" that Tern Place may be added to the district. My previous notice to , s you only discussed Eagle Rock Drive. The City wants you to have an opportunity to speak for or against the inclusion of Tern Place based upon your ownership of Lt 4, Blk 2. Sincerely, Charles A. Brown rinance Director CAB/vy3 To o t ' . CITY 4F KENA1 ••vd eat 4 �►,t�•• K IA110" , NMI t Ai December 23, 1985 _ .. _ 1. MEMORANDUM o ° TOs Kenai City Council QQ C - - -: -- -- -- FROMs Charlee,A. Browns Finance Director -. REs Assessment Petition, Done'ina Point Estates -_ On 12-10-859 the City received an assessment petition from Dena'ine Point Associatee, a partnershipq for roods, water. sewer and other improvements in Dens'ins Point Estates, Tracts A-1 through A-5. (See Exhibit A). The first thing that should be noted is that the petitioners have ® asked' for the assessment district to be established in Dena'ina of a ° ; Point Estates No. 2, which -is a preliminary plot reaubdivision of the above -mentioned Tracts A-1 through A-4. Assessments are liens against real properties. The.City cannot establish the district in properties that do not legally exist. Therefore, if a district is formed, it -must be in the property - = that is final platted and recorded. At this point, that is as stated in the first paragraph above. ° Another important point is that the petitioners have requested that coats be allocated on a square footage basis and that all of A-1, A-21 A-39 A-4 and A-5 be considered as a whole when computing the assessment rate. KMC 16.05,100 sets out the following guidances "Except as otherwise provided by lordinenceg or by -L Council -approved policy for a particular local improvement _ ---- district# costs will be allocated on a square footage basis - extending one lot deep adjacent to improvements in subdivided areas, midway between streets up to 150 feet of depth it1 unsubdivided residential areseg and up to 300 feet of depth in unsubdivided commercial and industrial areas." - =-- While Council has the option of choosing any allocation method it deep deems appropriate, the usual method here would be one lot in subdivided areas and 150 feet deep in unsubdivided &roes.' Again, ; ,.. .4•0 — .. '... .. :. .1 '— '_-T-.'�1�- .r `J .fib •. —, �1 � - w a CITY OF KENAlt MARCH 189 1986 This is concerning the street improvements, upgrading and future paving, on Eagle Rock Place, Tern Place. We approve of the fact that the City is planning on reproving Eagle Rock Placel however, we disagree on the engineering philosophy. 1. We feel that the drainage as proposed will drain runoff directly onto our property, Oovt. Lots 6 & 7, Section 61 TSN, RION. We feel that the dividing point of the drainage should be moved west 200+' fram that proposed. This could be accomplished by having the high point on the street at the east edge of Lot 21 Block 1. We propose a culvert under Eagle Rock Place at the west side of Tern Place. The ensuing runoff could then be diverted back to the gully beyond Lot 4 and between Lot 4 and Lot S of Sungate Subdivision. This existing glully is a natural drainage area. We propose a 120' long by 6' wide drainage ditch at the edge of Lot 4. The City could build this ditch, and we propose to dedicate the above mentioned area, for the purpose of draining runoff to the gully. This would then be the City's responsibility for maintenance. 2. We do not approve of the location of the drainage sump as proposed at the February 27 hearing. The location of this sump is definitely too close to our existing well which supplies drinking water to our home. There should be a better way of handling the drainoff from melting snow and ice and rain that at the present time comes shooting down Into our drive and yard. This runoff floods our drive, ending up going down our private road to the river and requires constant maintenance. Is there a possibility of Including a gravel ditch or a culvert to the bank to take care of this - approximately 75'? The material In this area Is VERY FINE sand and when wet flows like water. 3. Culverts - We request two culverts. a. An access culvert at the upper end of Block 419 Lot #10 Eagle Rock Place. b. An access culvert midway of property of Block 029 Lot 04, ••'A.a..��'d.e.'i.,Is.i:�. �idtir/.f��i ..-..�: z': tva,:,,� :, r• o :e-i — '3+k..edf 11�W1t�L 3�As>i.r ;, . r _. r 4. We do not approve of Including the paving of Tern Place 1n the improvements to Eagle Rock Place - There are only two residences on Tern Place and T one abuts Eagle Rock Place. We believe It Is unfair to charge us for this paving when we will not benefit from it. -.- = S. We are concerned that there are only two other Improvement districts for asphalt pavingi only one of thoso is in a residential area and that was proposed by a developer) In the City of Kenai. We believe It Is unfair for the residents of this z Improvement district to supply SOX of the cost of - .. paving. In our case$ as the situation now .,..:':• . n stands, we would be supplying the City with over „ •. ���: .a $149000 towards this project. And at this point we do not know what percentage of interest will be charged nor do we know the time frame for payoff. r� = In our retiring yearst we should not be faced with this type of burden, which ws consider unfair. _ i_; •. We also note a large discrepancy between the two figures quoted to us the first proposal was for a total of less than $199001 the second proposal Including interest adds up to $14,000. As a point of Interest, we have been residents of the area since 1952l all of that time have resided In the City of . Kenai and have supported the City, with our taxes, our `3 n efforts and through many organizations. We moved onto our homestead here in the spring of 1957. When we were able to obtain easement from Jimmy Davidson in 1964 we had s Eagle Rock Place built at our own expense, and were : y responsible for giving Eagle Rock Place its present name, It is interesting to note that for all of our years here at = Eagle Rock, there has been minimal street maintenance, little fire protections and now we are being asked to help pay for paving of not only Eagle Rock Placep but also of Tern Places �� Thank you for listening to us '- Attachment 14- u u' .. ,, .��(-Is••. lijlY�i�M�==iwi�[i.}Q�?'•�','ia�d1: •.i=L,• d`s•, l4s: U-Ud�P�4 J76, - - • Mrs. 1.41 F I 1� v r Suggested by: Administration © CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1119-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, APPROPRIATING $459000 FOR THE PAVING OF EAGLE ROCK DRIVE. WHEREAS, the City intends to pave Eagle Rock Drive at a cost of approximately $459000, with one-half of the costs assessed against benefited properties and one-half financed by the 1985 Municipal Road Grant; end, WHEREAS, the Administration desires that the assessed portion of the project be initially financed by the General Fund Capital Improvement Reserve. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Capital Improvement Reserve $22,500 Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Transfers Out $22,500 Robin, Kensitze, Eagle Rock, Sandpiper, Tern and South trawberry Cap at Project Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfer from General Fund $229500 1985 Road Grant $22 500 Increase Appropriations: Construction S4 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day "``. _• of March, 1986. It`d'TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ;rATTEST:4.4 -- 3anet Whelan# City Clerk . :.. r...;.:. 'J. Firs► Reading: March 59 1966 ' ._ ,....:. Second Reading: March 19, 1986 w ,i ` - Effective Date: March 190 1986 - �„ Approved by Finance:_Q, 2/26/96 :,. :;�.• ell AN c};tyr - -_.+ 1,e.-� .�•�....._.._._ ... _ .—r,.-^^-^Y:v+'7ti!. - ice•-'rl"•q� < c. 0 X 0 SUBSTITUTE Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1119-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, APPROPRIATING $539000 FOR THE PAVING OF EAGLE ROCK DRIVE AND TERN PLACE. WHEREAS, the City intends to pave Eagle Rock Drive and'Tern-Place, at a coat of approximately $5390009 with one-half of the coats assessed against benefited properties and one-half financed by the 1965 Municipal Road Grants and, WHEREAS, the Administration desires that the assessed portion of the project be initially financed by the General Fund Capital Improvement Reserve. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Capital Improvement Reserve 126,500 Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Transfers Out $26,500 Robin Kenaitze Eagle Rock Sand i er Tern and South Strawberry Capital FroJect Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfer from General Fund $269500 1985 Road Grant $26,500 Increase Appropriations: Construction 15 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of March, 1986. ATTEST: Janet a en, City Clerk Approved by Finance: ,!U 3/6/66 iY■"l:T�i�I�I�i;�4i:Tt(�I;� First Readings March 5, 1986 Second Readings March 19, 1966 Effective Dates March 19, 1986 i 1 0 E 6 ~ Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 86-22 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE GYMNASIUM CAPITAL PROJECT FUND: From: Gymnasium - Land $1,554 Gymnasium - Machinery do Equipment 4 Gymnasium - Engineering 968 52.526 To: Gymnasium - Construction ILJI.6 This transfer allocates all unspent monies in the fund to construction for enclosure of the ramp at the Recreation Center. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 19th day of March, 1986. Tom Wagoner, Mayor.° ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk 3%11/bed by Finances � • �q=� . .j4''- 3r�%^_.,�'= ._...-ey,�i�relCCa.� •�gy*�"yz?ee�srer�.rr .. ..'S� C "- MEMORANDUM TO: Wm. J. Brighton# City Manager FROM: Keith Korneliat Public Works Director DATE: March 19, 1986 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO 86-22 ENCLOSURE RAMP AT RECREATION CENTER A while back the Council asked about residing the older part of the Recreation/Gym building with redwood. This would be covering the T-111 siding with redwood like the Gym part. A recent estimate -to complete the building in redwood is $13,000 - Resolution No. 86-22 is for a covered ramp that will be T-111 to match the old part of the building where the ramp is located. If the Council wants to reside the old building in redwood, we will only put on plywood siding on the ramp enclosure instead to T-111 and later cover the whole thing with redwood. KK/aw .:710 -41 - IT `51 r_ 0 Suggested bys Administration I CITY OF KENAI r RESOLUTION NO. 86-23 s BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA19 ALASKA THAT ` THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1985-1986 WATER AND SEWER FUNDs From: Water - Contingency $29000 Sewer - Contingency $39000 To: 1 ' Water - Overtime $2,000 :. Sewer - Overtime $3,000 - This transfer provides additional overtime monies in the water `Y and sewer fund. More overtime has been used then was anticipated due to increased problems with lift slatione, well houses, pump ., houses, frozen and plugged water and sewer lines, etc. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 19th day n: of March, 1986. a Tom Wagoner, Mayor ATTESTsf3 Janet Whelan, City erk .fi Approved by Finances CA- 3/11/86 _ •-2r icR .•-yr•--+"T-W'.•';'.+.'.+-"'_--^-^-'c'--- _ _ n. fi " Lc:_�. • ., cam. .ate.-� .. _ -___ a " J� k C _60 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 86-24 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT. -c THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1985-1986 GENERAL �< FUND BUDGET: From: Shop - Operating Supplies $5,000 To: A Shop - Repair and Maintenance s5,000 :._. This transfer provides additionalmoney for contracted repairs of vehicles and equipment. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 19th day of March, 1986. Tom WagonerMayor - - - ATTEST: ,r _-Janet Whelan i y Clerk Approved by Finance: �alJ r;. 3/11 /66 - r k tiR .ice ... i R f , 11 71 Suggested by: Administration I CITY OF KENAI i RESOLUTION NO. 86-25 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE 1985-1986 GENERAL - FUND BUDGET: = :� From: Other - Contingency $150000 �" _.._ _..----- -- To: Non -Departmental - Professional Services $159000 This transfer provides monies for an employee classification study and pay plan review. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 19th day : + of Narch, 1966. Tom Wagoner, Mayor R' ATTEST: U ` Janet Whelan, City Clerk ' Approved by Finance: CSQ - 3/12/86 s , 71 - '.al•.�rs lO.IVL'L'G... .. ..,� .:,U.9 .. .... _ .t ._`a: _ `n'Y .t , i,a A C 0 i1M AOalas C"Anano CW W KM 4*sowe es»w V PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered Into the day of 1986, by and between the rT y of Kenai, a INUMICIP61 Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Alsoka, hereinafter designated as "City", and JANET M. JARON, hereinafter designated so "Contractor.j' WITNESSETHs That for and In consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter stated; 1. (a) The Contractor agrees to perform all of the work described in Attachment A, entitled "Scope of Services." and to comply with the terms therein for a coat not to exceed that elated in Attachment B. (b) The Contractor further agrees that a full and accurate understanding exists regarding the work required in the referenced "Scope of Services;" and that there shall be no changes made to this "Scope of Services" without prior written consent of the City. Y. The Contractor shall furnish all of the materials, equipment, labor, and other services Be stated In Attachment A. 3. The Contractor shall commence the required work Immediately. 4. The City shall pay the Contractor according to the payment schedule, Attachment 6, as written. S. The City retains the authority to require additions or changes that me arise through the required course of work to be performed relating to this project. Notification of the additione or changes shall be made in writing to the Contractor. 6. Contractor agrees to perform any additions or changes directed by the City with payment for additions and changes not to exceed per diem or per hour amounts delineated In Attachment B. 7. As applicable, the Contractor agrees to abide by existing 1yw (State and Federal); and to provide for strict compIlona# with some as they valets to the followings a. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO). b. Workmen's Compensation Insurance. a. The Contractor agrees that compliance with the above I e the responsibility of the Contractor and that the City shell be held harmless for any resulting violation of !hose requirements. 8. The Contractor shall indemnify end hold and save the City, its officers, agents and employees harmless from liability of any nature or kind, which may arise from the performance of this agreement in an waY whatsoever. Such liability may Include, but is not limited to, costa and expenses for or on account of any and all legal actions or claims of any character whatsoever resulting from injuries or damages sustained by any person or property which may arise from the performance of this agreement In any way whatsoever. 9. This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, exeoutore, adminieteators and sucoessoro. 1 . PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT y1M 1{oaM an •ttontr CITY OF xp" . O o.,a 066% AMgwN11 inxw 10. This AGREEMENT shell not be assigned without the written consent of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partlee hereto have executed or caused to be executed by their duly outhorixed officials, this AGREEMENT in three (3) copies, each of which shell be deemed an original on the date first written above. CITY OF KENAI eye m. J. Brighton City Manager CONTRACTOR Sys Janet M. Jaron II 2 • pROFESSIONAI SERVICES AGREEMENT n no 101 KENAI CITY COUNCIL - 11 - April 2, 1986 two viewing platforms. We felt this park should be accessible to the people rather then just a view park. There will be a hotel, HEA, and other major buildings adjacent to this. Mayor Wagoner suggested retainage board on the path so the material would not drift. Councilmember Ackerly asked how big the trees are initially. Me. Little replied six to eight feet. Councilmember Ackerly noted that it will take 15 years for them to grow. Mayor Wagoner asked if all the plants were native. Me. Little replied) majority are notnative but grow well here. She has proposed a one-year maintenance contract put into the proposal. Regarding the Coat - If the City could acquire a fill, it would decrease the initial $969000 cost. Mayor Wagoner asked how much of this could be done by our summer crews. Mr. Gintoll noted that this was supposedto go out to bid with the Airport paving. City Manager Brighton stated that if we are going to spend that kind of money we should have a Landscape artist. Mayor Wagoner noticed a Landscape artist just edviees, he does not do the work. City Manager Brighton replied that City crews do this, we have no guarantee. No action was taken by Council. G-6 Discussion - Spenard Building Supply tie into City Storm draine. e City Engineer LaShot explained information on this is in the packet. Spenard Building Supply could do this but it would not be se easy as they thought. They would have to run a storm drain across Redoubt. The one they wanted to use wee e_" _. sanitary sewer. City Manager Brighton asked if we had heard from Spenard Builder Supply. Answer, no. Mayor Wagoner noted ••, this does not havo to come back to Council. �= - H REPORTS " H-1 City Manager City Manager Brighton spoke: <� a. There will be a Legislative Conference April 31, 19869 regarding campgrounds in the Municipalities. b. At the April 16, 1986, meeting we will have proposed . budgets and an agenda for work sessions. O H-2 Attorney Attorney Rogers spoke: a. The Katmai lawsuit (item H-2). We ware able to keep our loses to a minimum. There may be similar occurences at other businesses in the City. ' �'° ", �Jehra•.' of ��� o o - �'.. 1 t� � r�➢r _ 4 a r [ Pl •. ,., J... ° ,: Z A ° �,.��.� o o vh., A'.r �r v ry }1lQ 1r 8 0. ii} SN `7 17 tY ''((y s9y .d• ` '_`. . .. __ , wn •poa oouw .�795 " 40 a� A O 0 e r 0 7 o A N e A a Z N Q w 00 d d oD v CD 0 .. '••. con a L A W L -:F:,— !j o� , PAYMENTS Payment for work will be made within two weeks following monthly 9 billing by the consultant which outlines work completed. Billing x will be by hours worked with these exceptions: i• 1. No more that fifteen (15%) percent of the total estimated amount will be paid until deliverables related to the first meeting with the City are received. t 2. No more then eighty (80%) percent of the total i estimated amount will be paid until delivery of the final report. 3. The final twenty (20%) percent will be payable upon receipt of the completed recommendations and material. The consultant will be reimbursed for direct air travel costa Incurred, The City will provide any ground transportation needed while the consultant is in Kenai. ' The consultant will be paid $85.00 per diem for each day in travel status. o Estimated costs ere: Classification and Pay Study ($50 an hour for 238 hours) $11,900 {r Days in Travel Status (Ten days at $85) 850 > Airfare Juneau -Kenai -Juneau (Two roundtrips at $424, One roundtrip at $343) 1.191 TOTAL s13.941 , z Total contract costs will not exceed the estimated total without prior approval of the City. Every effort will be made to complete the work within the contract amount. Material changes to the contract shall be made in compliance with Paragraph 6 of the contract. -,, - -- -- ATTACHMENT "B° .. T' ..1 -:ti�iit"tw.Cl,�S».�t.lt•i: �anr ti�.'!�. ..., ._ .r :iYO- .Af :i�111�f:.-5t'.�.'Y �`.i.:_ 1/'... _ ', 'e,_> j 4 .. .or- ,• -- t .. ,...�. - per,-, .. Suggested bys City Council CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 86-26 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT THE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF MONIES BE MADE IN THE LAKE, MARINE, AND GRANITE POINT CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. From: Contingency $69947 Tos Inspection $69947 This transfer provides additional monies for inspection services on the project. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 19th day of March, 1986. _ Tom Wagoner, eyor ATTEST: ane a an, City Clerk Approved by Finance: CQQ t 3/13/86 ® J!n _4 _ no- :. X:, ._ 0 E X fa - MEMORANDUM T0: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager FROM: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director DATE: March 12, 1986 SUBJECT: LAKE MARINE, MAIN ST. LOOP, GRANITE POINT, do FBO NELSON'S INSPECTION CONTRACT First I went to preface my remarks by saying that I think both Bill Nelson and Carmen Gintoli do excellent jobs at reasonable prices for the City. I have and will continue to give an excellent rating to requests for recommendations about their firms. My remarks are purely a matter of technical interpretation of our contract and what I feel we legally owe them. In all cases where additional compensation is requested our contracts call for written authorization from the City prior to any work being done. In almost all cases we do not know how close to the not -to -exceed figure the architect/engineer is until he submits his final billing. This is usually long after the project is 100% complete. Therefore we need for the architect/engineer to request the additional compensation in writing prior to the work so we can find the funds to pay them if the work is approved. This was not done in this case (nor in Mr. Gintoli's case) therefore all other scenarios can be laid aside and the City technically is not libel to pay. At the Council Meeting Mr. Nelson said he did extra work because of City approved change orders that extended the contract 14 days. His point is that he gave the City a price for a certain amount of Inspection work which was to take 120 days plus 24 days (20% of construction time of 120 days). In the middle of the project, Mr. Nelson found some service lines that were not included in the project by the designer. Because of that and other change orders, we added extra work to the contractor and gave him more time. Mr. Nelson did not, at that time, request additional compensation. He evidently thought he could still do the project under hie not -to -exceed figure. However; there is a contract clause where the City is to authorized iy nwriting for dinional r advance(S.Oe1.01b)vicest iwhichded hat it is says: "Additional services due to significant changes in general scope of the project or its design, including but not limited to changes in eize, complexity, or character of construction." ••.AYYfifi�fcf�...lyjltff_N1.! �'A�. S:..i.�.�.�. OWN .. - L. . . M 1 A hard -nose approach would be to say he is not entitled to additional compensation because the construction contract was not prolonged by more than 20 percents ro Nelson looks at t as that was for the on anal construction contract but by giving the contractor extra no should get extra since he had to be there working also. The main criteria for not giving additional compensation should be NO WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION was given by the City prior to the work being aone. This has been both a hard issue and a time consuming issue for me. There are probably hard feelings not only from the architect and engineer but the Council. Actually I have no problem (and neither does Charlie) with the Council paying the architect and engineer extra. I'm just trying to do my job in showing what I intended when I wrote these contracts. The City Council always has the option to amend a contract. KK/sw cos Bill Nelson u AMENDMENT NO. 1 to AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES Dated August 22, 1984 For MAIN STREET LOOP, LAKE, MARINE GRANITE POINT, AND 1rBO PAVING Between The City of Kenai and William J. Nelson & Associates The original Agreement which was effective August 229 19849 is hereby amended as follows: 1. By the direction of the Council of the City of Kenai on March 59 1986, the Engineering Inspection Services is hereby increased by a not -to -exceed amount of $69947.00. All pertinent and applicable sections of the original Agreement will be adhered to for this Amendment. Wm. J. Nelson's request for this additional increase in cost dated November 209 1985, is attached and made a pert of this Amendment No. 1. The Council of the City of Kenai, Alaska, approved this Amendment �.J No. 1 on March 5, 1966. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Amendment in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. (SEW OWNER: CITY OF KENAI ATTESTS Bys Typed Names Wm. J. Brighton Typed Names Titles_ City Manager Titles Dates ENGINEERS William J. Nelson 8 Assoc. By: ATTEST: Typed Names Wm. J. Nelson Titles Principal ® Typed Names Dates rkoi 4• . t r 91 P 06 February 28, 1986 Kai th Kernel I s Public Works Director City of Kenai 215 Fidalgo Street Kenai, AK 99611 0 I= T -I WA - 171�ErA;;t is Roo 08448 - Main Street LoopolUkeq Marine, Granite Point, FBO - November Sq 1985 Billing Dear Mrs Kernelise I have received your memo regarding denial of payment for the November 8, 1985 billing which my firm submitted for the above project. The apparent reason for denial was lack of a second to the, motion by Council to pay the bill. It appears that the Council did not have backup information to justify the billing. 0 I would like to take this opportunity to provide some backup and ask that this subject be reconsidered. The contract for Inspection of this project was based an in estimated 120 day construction period. This project was b"an in the fall of 1984 and was scheduled to be complete an August 19 191350 During the course of construction we noticed a situation an Main Street Loop that could cause a future problem for the City. Specifically, it was noted that certain lots fronting an Main Street Loop did not have water and "war services scheduled to be installed under this projects We asked the City administration If they would like to have these services installed In order to avoid having to dig up the newly paved street should development of one of the late occur In the near future. The administration agreed and Change Order No. 2 for the work was approved by the Council resulting In a 12 day contract extension* Change Order No. Iq regarding fire hydrant extensions and luminaire bases .9 extended the contract by 2 daysp allowing the Contractor to bet substantially complete by August 15.p 1985. The total contract extension of 14 days accounts for the 11.7% increase referred to by Mr. Bromi in his memo to the Council., u Keith Korneiis February 28. 1986 - Page Two The Contractor was substantially complete as of August 14• 1985. However• we continued to provide inspection services beyond sub- stantial completion in order to inspect punch list items. We filed i ti t on 8/16 8RPM19 8/and 9/3 The Con- nepec an repor s • • tractor was working on the project and we were inspecting through 9/3/83 which represents 33 days or 27.57 over the original con- tract. This is in excess of the 20% required by Section 5.01.01 of our Contract as pointed out in Mr. Brown's memo. We are still working on this project. Just today• 6_1LZ mgntb§ �` x stUm substantia . cgm LetLon. I received another phone call from the Contractor regarding the asphalt specification for the pro- ject and project close out. To date we have logged 35.5 hours of Inspector's time and 7.5 hours of Principal Engineer time beyond the August 14• 1985 date. However• we do not intend to bill the City for this time. We are only asking to be reimbursed for o. extra services during the period August 2 - August 15. 1983 which corresponds to the actual extension of the contract prior to substantial completion. We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City and are proud A lf,.. of our record of maintaining quality coptrol and keeping A, _ construction costs within budget. Sincerely• Wm. J. Nelson & Associates Wm. el $on • P.E. Pr ncipal WJN/beg r, ,,��'�R.1,.,.. MEMO TO: Kenai City Council FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director eqa DATE: November 26, 1985 SUBJECT:- Bill Nelson request for authorisation of additional services - Main St., Lake, Marine, etc. Bill Nelson has requested an authorization of additional inspection services on this project in the amount of $6,947. His final billing is attached, along with his request, for your reference. I have also attached two pages from the inspection contract. The following points should be made: 1) Section 5.01.01 of the contract calls for prior, write authorization for additional services. This was not done. 2) It appears that Mr. Nelson s as ng or additional payment under 5.01.01 (h) (3). That is, he provided inspection services for 14 additional days. However, that section doesn't seem to C apply; JA days is an 11.7% increase in time. not the 202 called for in the contract. It seems to me that this is a decision to be made by Council. You may increase the contract amount, but I do not believe you are obliged to do go. If you decide to increase the contract for these additional services, please do so by motion. if it is increased, we will put a resolution transferring the money from contingency and the billing before you at the 12-18-85 meeting. Gs tip-►..t ZWAO . IVOW • ,. ��. gym:_ -a sit . .,r P A J. Nelson & dissociates ALAS" 99811 November 20, 1985 Keith Kornelis City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo St. Kenai, AK 99611 Q15RoALGo. SUITE eo4 Res #8448 - MAIN STREET LOOP - Inspection =NSULTNG ENGINEERS TURAL / CIVIL / PLANNING (907) @63-3683 Dear Keiths The contract for inspection of this project was based upon com- pletion of he work by the Contractor within the contracted time limit of ..0 calendar days, for an original completion date of July 31, 1 ° Various change orders for additional work extended the Contrac- tor's time an additionaldays to August 14, 1985. As such we provided inspection services beyond the original time limit included in our Contract. Since the inspection contract limits the amount which can be billed without further approval, I am now requesting that our not -to -exceed amount be increased to cover the additional costs involved. , A breakdown of charges for this project is attached for your review. You will notice that our charges for inspection services were below the "not -to -exceed" amount for work completed within the Contract oven though we provided approximately $39500.00 of additional testing services above our proposed amount. Sincerely, Wm. J. Nelson & Associates ` L. .J. Nelson, P.E. b. _ rincipal Note., WJN/bg RC ' -, si4N� 1I fi1' 4Ut��riZ�ON Attachment A.- we i I &Assodafes CONSULTING BNBINEEM W4a son STRUCTURAL / CIVIL/ PLANNI CP.O. BOX 1SSS KEN4 ALAS" 8BS11 215 ROALGO. SUITE E04 .4/C 7-7 97 November 20, 1985 City of Kenai a tit,. c( l;:nal 210 Fidalgo St. ;,Public V10*3 CePL Kenai, AK 99611 !" . N8448 - MAIN STREET LOOP, LAKE, MARINE, GRANITE POINT, F.H.O. Final Statement Services Under Original Contract 8/22/84 - 7/31/85 and 8/16/85 - Presents CONTRACT ACTUAL Principal/Engineer 3,250.00 79312.50 C Inspector Engineer Technician 54,300.00 29800.00 50,553.50 19520.00 Drafting 1,400.00 122.50 Clerical 1,250.00 643.75 Vehicle 4,000.00 39760.00 Reimbursable (soils test, etc) 69500.00 11,500.75 Surveying 39,160.00 37,217.50 2, 11660.00 ✓ / 112, 630.30 �' Services Outside Original Contract 8/i/85 - 8/15/858 Pri nci pal /Engineers 10.5 hrs X $65/Hr 682.50 ✓ Inspectors (ST) 88 hrs X $40%Hr 3,520.00✓ (OT) 46 hrs X/$49;/'Hr 2,254.00✓ Vehicles 13 days X $40/day 520.004 Increase in Contract Scopes $6,976.50 or Total Services: -.t less previously received s BALANCES Atom. &Ad. Wg-'SOWN I fiow 0 fe? /vifr Ni0 fps" �Ws CNO r. ro . xre�seA o4,r/t,4cr o 4 w*A AM :T 0 (112*660.00) ✓ $6994j. 00 qq.�. 4 Lir_.t4 1W peo,joa0on"Iotlu..n. , Project Title Not -to Exceed Lake, Marine, Granite Point, P80, Main Street Loop $112,660.00 4.01,02 Third Party Exoenses t a. Certain third party expenses for basic services incurred by the Project Engineer such as surveying, soil testing, soil compactions, concrete tests and the like may, upon prior -- written approval by the City's Public Works Director, be # subcontracted for by the Project Engineer at a cost which is the product of their customary rates. All such work,sholl f be performed by licensed surveyors and established testing laboratories at rates approved by the City prior to the start of the work. Such third party expenses are included in the not -to -exceed amount listed in Section 4.01.01. ;•y b. Compensation to workers shall be in accordance with the State of Alaska Statutes (Title 36). f c. The Project Engineer shall invoice the City for all such ^ third party costs at actual costs plus 10%. -� F' 4,01.03 Since the City's total budget limitation for inspection cannot exceed those limits as set forth in 4.01.01 above, it is clearly understood between the parties that the Project Engineer will receive as consideration for his services on each individual project those rates and charges as enumerated in Attachment A and third party coats as set forth in Article 4.01.02 but in no event shall the City be obligated to pay more than the not -to -exceed figures for each individual respective project as indicated in 4.01.01 above. A SECTION 5 L= ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER r4 5.01 Written Authorizations Needed: �•' ti 5:01.01 If authorize IN WRITING the City' prior any work being done, the near will Turn or obtetn from =: 'others additional services of the following types which will be =, paid for by the City as indicated in Section 6s .' Be Preparation of applications and supporting documents for 9 9r overnmenta! cants loans or advances in connection with Public Works projects. - --- - `� �` F: 12 u'n� ngineec :'3+ir.liiel.'%r,.� s....a.-F n.c. '1. - A ."- >v�':3a• • :.A -- -- --- — - ' r r �:.ff•::' b. Additional services due to oigniftaone ohangeo �.. g�.�o��� •-..•..�r�Mo. scope of the project or its design, including but not limited to changes in size, complexity, or character or s-=-•::_' construction. e. Revising previously approved studies, reports, design documents, drawings or specifications, if such revision is not due to the Project Engineer's fault. d. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by the City ' for work which is not art of the original p proposal. e. Preparing detailed renderings, exhibits or scale models for the project. f. Furnishing additional copies of reports and additional prints of drawings and specificatiuns. g. Investigations involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; and the preparation of rate schedules, earnings and expense statements, feasibility studies, appraisals and y valuations �.. and material audits or inventories required for i certification of force account construction performed by the City. 0 1•._ h. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction; (2) defective or neglected work of the t contractor 4:11 = - ; (3) colon ation of the construction contract time br more then ZU oercentsacceleration othe wor schedule invo v n sere ces -Beyond normal working hours if the construction contract time is not shortened and (S) *'•�= _ default under the construction contract due to delinquency or insolvency. I. Additional services and costs necessitated by out of town ' - - travel required by the Project Engineer and approved by the City other than visits to the Y project as required by Section. ._,, = t 3• .. J. Additional cervices in connection with the project, including services normally furnished by the City and ;.j services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 113 JP hJe'n . 1� ° Ingineer 1 cy `-' Suggested bys Adminietretion CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0, 1121-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BYg1:;768 INN THE HIGHBUSH, ALIAK, SWIRES CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TO FINANCE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROJECTS AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS. WHEREAS, the City desires to raise the road gradee and install infiltration structures on East Aliek from Highbush to Swiree and on Swiree in the project (Alternate 4A) at an estimated cost of $469700; end, WHEREAS, the inspector has requested $25,548 as additional Inspection costs under his existing contract; and, WHEREAS, $20t48O is available in the Fund to be transferred to appropriate accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section 1s The following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund increase Estimated Revenuess Appropriations of Capital Improvement Reserve $51 Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Transfers JU,768 Highbush. Alisk, Swiree Caaitel Project -- J _._ - -_ _ 114L". ..1 increase Estimated Revenuess Transfer from General Fund 551 Increase Appropriationes Inspection $330848 Construction JI71920 1 0 w' Section 2: The following transfers of monies be made within the Highbushp Aliak, Swiree Capital Project Funds _ From: Administration $ 516 Contingency $19.964 To: Construction ULALO PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of March, 1986. ct TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Y �_* 3snet Whelan, City Clerk • - ' <y`. First Reading: March 19, 1986 t Second Readings March 199 1986 Effective Dates March 19, 1986 Approved by Finance:-ega 3/13/66 , .. ✓ W M SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1121-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI. ALASKA.,".:. INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $151:S68.IN THE HIGHBUSH, ALIAK, SWIRES CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TO FINANCE iw ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROJECTS AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS.:- WHEREAS, the City desires to raise the road grades and install infiltration structures on East Alisk from the Creek to Swires, - - - - --- Hi.ghbueh, Bumblebee and on Swires in the project (Alternate.: an estimated cost of $148,500; and, -- WHEREAS, the inspector has requested $25,548 as additional ~, inspection coats under his existing contract; and, WHEREAS, $20,48O is available in the Fund to be transferred to appropriate accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section 1: The following increase in estimated revenues and appr�Eions be made: General Fund ncreas9 Estimated Revenues: Appropriations of Capital Improvement .. _.: Reserve Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Transfers 6153,568 R ; Hiahbush. Aliak, Swires Capital Protect increase tecimacea nevenues: Transfer from General Fund Increase Appropriatione: Inspection Construction 1 L A Section 2: The following transfers of monies be made within the Highbush, Aliak, Swires Capital Project Funds From: Administration $ 516 Contingency $192964 370,480 To: Construction S20�.000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of March, 1986. TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelang City Clerk Approved by Finance:_ead 3/13/86 First Readings March 199 1986 Second Reading: March 19, 1986 Effective Date: March 19, 1986 2 n _ a.. 1 uAz SUBSTITUTE NO. 2 10 Suggested bye Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1121-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY :1-759568 ;N THE HIGHBUSH, ALIAK, SWIRES CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TO FINANCE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROJECTS AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS. WHEREAS, the City deeiree to raise the road grades and install infiltration structures on all the roads in the project (Alteiti 4 'et an estimated cost of $17095001 and, WHEREAS, the inspector has requested $25,548 as additional inspection costs under his existing contract; end, WHEREAS, $20,460 is available in the Fund to be transferred to appropriate accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section 1: The following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriations of Capital Improvement Reserve 117 Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Transfers £17 LU"a8 Hiahbush. Alisk, Swires Capital Project Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfer from General Fund LuLhm Increase Appropriations: Inspection : 50,548 Construction $125,020 MOM Section 2: The following transfers of monies be made within —the Highbueho Aliak, Swiree Capital Project Fund: From: Administration $ 516 Contingency $19.964 STRC8-0 To: Construction E20,400 .. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA# this 19th day of March, 1986. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk Approved by Finance:_ d TOM WAGONER, MAYOR First Reading: March 19, 1986 Second Reading: March 19, 1986 Effective Date: March 19, 1986 2 - _- = V ff '_-- 0--? CKY40JLIINGENC31NEEM March 149 1986 Keith Karnalls Public Works Di 'City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo St. Kenai, AK 99611 ko VON, 5�w KENAI. ALASKA 88811 Roo 08512 - H.A.S. PROJECT Dear Keithe As requested at the council work session, I have Investigated the feasibility and costs for raising the grades an the H.A.S. as described in Alternate No. 4 In my January 299 1986 ,project letter to you. A recap Is attached. An you and I have discussadg one of the major cost items included In my January 29, 1986 estimate was the cost of extending the storm drain an East Alisk and Swires. The total cost for the. storm drain extensions is estimated to be $49,,000. , To reduce costs it would be possible to provide 4 Infiltration drains, 2 an East Aliak and 2 an Swires In lieu of the storm drain at' an estimated cost of $149000 for a savings of *35,t000. 'The City has constructed Infiltration structures an other City street projects which are apparently operating without major problemog 'however, the storm drain would probably require less maintenance in the long runs In order to minimize the cost of raising the grades 'an them streets we have included the cost of constructing infiltration structures in lieu of extending the storm drain in this estimate.,. J Contractor regarding spoken with I have am proposed Chang" and he has verbally agreed that the extra work can be accomplished at the bid unit prices, where applicable. Based an 7 the amount of extra work relative to the original contract amount, I would recommend a 23 day contract extension to accom-'., J., .plish these changes. Ar - - - - - - - - - - - - - ONNEOP ___ &-.-- __ - y . T Keith Kornelis March 14, 1986 - Page 2 I have broken the costs down as followse Option 4A - Raise grades on Aliak from Highbush'to Swires and on Swires, including infiltration structures in lieu of storm drain. Option 48 - Include raising grades on Aliak from the creek to Highbush, and on Highbush and Bumblebee. This option requires infiltration structures on Bumblebee and North Highbush. Option 4C - Include raising grade on Aliak from Linwood to the creek. I will attend the council meeting to discuss this if you desire. I will also need an amendment to the inspection contract to cover the costs outlined in my March 11, 1%6 letter to you as well as the costs included for design, inspection, and surveying 'as described above. Some cost savings will be realized in the inspection portion since the Contractor will likely be working on road grades simultaneously with placing topsoil, etc. Sincerely, Wm. J. I1plson & Associates ' �� W J. Nelson, P.E. ; ' incipal 1 WJN/bsg Attachment 1' ' :i'r"t.;.; i.t,�.tS�i".1s1,.1_Ir•!�'',f:.%..�.....i.� I P ' t j' ��,� j ',` � �. { I: j I t'. � TIt t��'j,, is i l #,-i,: n �-`..✓1',r,�# i ,� � I, t 1 .•�. �.��;i, , -y�lt t � 1 '.t' if ts'! `� tr� ''" j ' ��'t.l�. • ;;;,,.#r �,,� I _l t+.,�(;�� •�:r���:S'','.'I°f'�s a(���iy' f ic�lY.� s�� ita+l-->i- i ,:j � � Il•,t��}.i�'�,. .f ; � 1 , �j ,�!•�r� r `is ;, [ ,if: °' ..t S - �.' w �M��1r!', v C� H.A.B. PROJECT PROPOSED GRADE CHANGES March 14, 1986 COST RECAPITULATION 4A Construction Design Inspection Surveying 4A + 4B Construction Design Inspection Surveying 4A -04B + 4C Construction Design Inspection Surveying $38,400 3,100 2,700 2,500 $469700 $1279700 6,400 8,900 5,500 .. . $148,500 $145,500 7,300 10,200 7,500 $170,500 `yG • :i L-r?� iri' p • .. _:_ ',-mow§ V= Wm. d Nelson &Associafes >9 KENAI, ALAG" 69811 January 29, 1986 Keith Kornelis Public Works Director City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai, Alaska 99611 Rs: H.A.S. PROJECT - INSPECTION MB FIOALGO• sumE eW C" 47e. CONSULTING E'NGINEER9 TURAL / CML / PLANNNO [907) e83-35E13 Dear Keith:` With reference to Section 5. 01. 01 H M of the City of Kenai _ T� Contract for Inspection I would like direction from you as to the City's intentions regarding continuing inspection of this pro- V.r: ject. Our last billing brought us up to our budget limit and we request authorization to increase the not to exceed limit in order to continue inspecting the project if the City desires. This is due to prolongation of the contract in excess of 20 percent. F Sincerely, ,{ Wm. J. Nelson Associates rincipai :o_ WJN/bsg :ki a � Mall . • ■ n A . =NSULTINO ENGINEERS March 119 1986 Keith Kornelis IV Public Works Director City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai, AK 99611 Res H.A.B. PROJECT Dear Mr. Korneliss The original contract time was 120 calendar days. The revised ti to date is 127 days. So far the Contractor has contract me , used 134 calendar days. It is anticipated that approximately 16 days worth of work will makeaantotalpending contractnthe Contracto time extensionrof 150/120 ling. This v 25%. i We request an increase in the not -to -exceed limit in the amount- c of $259547.25. This is broken down as followss $29380.50 Redesign . 075,00 Extend water 6 sewer/East Bumblebee 19075.00 075 f Redesign - Restaking 129340.00 25 I Extra Inspection - $799006 X 25% .,.S t: • $259547.25 i Sincerely, .1' Wm. J. Nelson 6 Associates f a �. Pr Vhc elson, P.E. t. Attachments N H.A.S. PROJECT COST RE -CAP w REDESIGN ENGINEER 8/2 7 Mrs. 8/8 S Mrs. 4 8/6 2 Mrs. 8/7 2 Mrs. �...- . 16 Hrs. X $75.00 • $19200.00 IFY . INSPECTOR 8/2 3 Hrs. �� 8/3 7 Hrs. O.T. �/ �S 8/5 7 Hrs. 40 8/6 3 Hrs.OPop v: 18 Hrs. X 450.00 + 7 X4 61.30 41i,480.30 EAST BUMBLEBEE EXTENSION (SHEARER) n` INSPECTOR 8/6 2.8 Hrs. n 8/12 6 Hrs. 8/13 7 Hro. 8/14 6 Hrs. 21.5 Hrs. X 450.00 B1078.00 REDESIGN - RESTAKING - a - 2 MAN PARTY 8/12 4 Hrs. 0/13 4 Hrs. 8/22 4 Hrs. ` 8/23 6.5 Hrs. 18.3 Hrs. X $126.50 • $29340.23 .}' • 1.1.. it 1`•`i%.,r;:��� •i •:' fr ' rr1+)1 y.;r . � �I 'rnljt.;9 ,{.d+•! ��rj 1 ' I •► .l, " . ij�7 .i h . •,_�"'P' '�`.f''Z�1, 4y,1%!':.` •���i. ! sf �c• � i * � .. 4.: .. ... — 77 ,. u = o F I • J y CONSULTING ENGINEERS, gy m. J. Nelson & Ai' sociai'es STRUCTURAL/CIVIL/PLANNING M BOK /688 KENAL ALAS" 88811 LM8 FlOALGO, SURE EOA (807(E83-3883 November 413;:41985 ...... ', ry:i "'!;�!t;�t� ,fie:ji'. •".:�'.+:�:���j�««t�i'`:Rj'�3. •, •'• K': r.^�•'.i.�.��ti '. f •'', .:.':: �ii:ihj:2 4.f►:s•I•t•'���f+••'t:�X:�'� iA'i•i{',:.•Cy�i•' ';Y►!;t�.��••'�►" j,• }:nl• !"''�i ��� ,'.�"Ksitifl Korne�its'a ++,' t i.. ''sAY�•;t�5;'!A: .'w"�:i;. ..is. P ll.c:�Wo�ks' ,Dig . � ;1J,.•: ;.,;,;�vsi a r::�sit< .4;: y�R. 2' ty.YOf Keneli r � telh }�''i'iQ':' j ?;}i. Ci, •`. .., .jal;c�I�,'r;, ..;�+• ;J •t,,r .. �;► 10•-Ftdalgo ..St t �';;t•. ;'Menal-;�AK',996i '' +:� ;•..` t •' .•r. •i ' .. \ S' ,}�ijW� i� �ty� r0.•••tr.: '_r' t�! Rey "MW A: B:`: J�ict Cont tor-4: Schedule ' :• fk¢uj:t ;; =FThe'ConEraetbe• �,+, ested;'a ' 30 day time' exterisi on per , the 4Z' " attached memo.'�� OIf% 4; eeOrd" ndicate that approximately 32 extra R .., .. ,'; days of of Eorrt;:wers:required . fa'r the Contractor . to complete work •{ •1i,'!"W1 `outside o •the •Contract. ;A Iiating.'is attached. !�� ;Rfi` `ij•j•ij'i • 1rti,���., �• '..�.. ��•+"� •y "'"'�Wm..�:' Neisbn •de��'A'ssbeiates• ":�• ,. ' Wm Al t t��,j•,!'�y.�%�q" ��� �g,'••�,+�.i..i �a•� 11••��!�.. 1•i�4;. �'�{"i • � . A 1.,{ f i� .PttaChment ` ,� �L:+ 3. •#;fit, • � ..t•;; fir+:: �• ; 1 fir... , . • ....l,Ii�Ylilyd+i.:i'.iYjF;�u.�`/�iii .��i4 J:�7.['�f+ • , o. S; r .r F WORK OUTSIDE OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT H.A.S. PROJECT - PROJECT N8512 4" S.S. SERVICE REPAIRS - 9 each: 2 days 4" S.S. SERVICE LATERAL CONNECTIONS - 3 each: 1-1/5 day3-•-- 3/4" WATER SERVICE REPAIRS/EXTENSIONS - 12 each: 3 days ' 314" WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS - 4 each: 2 days INSTALL 54 L.F. 6" WATER MAIN (W. Bumblebee): 1 day - INSTALL 350 L.F. 12" WATERMAIN (E. Aliak): 2 days INSTALL (2) GATE VALVES (E. Aliak): 1 day " a INSTALL F.H. ASSEMBLY (Farce Account - E. Bumblebee): i day - INSTALL F.H. ASSEMBLY (Bid Item - W. Bumblebee): 1 day - LOWER 24" CMP STORM DRAIN & MANHOLES: 5 days REPLACE EG 36" 16 L.F. CMP CULVERT-(E. Aliak): INSTALL 1 day 24" 40 L.F. CMP CULVERT -OVERFLOW (E. Aliak): 1/2 day INSTALL 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT 2 ea. 21 L.F.: 1/2 day INSTALL 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT EXTENSIONS a r 2 each - 10 L.F.: 1/2 day EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS ON E. Aliak -! 1400 coy* & Filter Fabric: 1-1/2 days EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS ON SWIRES DR. 3000 cy: 2 days Q ADD S.S. MH 10 & S.D. MH 5.: 2 days - DIFFERENCE OF EXCAVATION QUANTITES: Original Design: Useable Materials - 14,900 c.y." Unusable Materials - 13,800 c.y. Redesigns' Useable Materials - 31000 coy. Unuseable Materials - 319461 coy. P ' Type III Backfill - 0 TOTAL: 349461 coy. 2 days a' -LOWERED MH RIM ADJUSTMENTS ON E. ALIAK'- 7 Rach: days . TOTAL:.- . 3�. 5 days a -° ' • ' ,' ram, u � r ,.—:L *6 SIGNED N '' .. CITY OF KENAI P. O. BOX 500 • I991MI, A1.AOKA 99611 PHON6 242.1635 Akko h 1 OATB $• •I " Hw�r ; susiacr WAS. Awl;r -.071 •' �1 }�..i a �t �a��y ✓Gdt.Ies�a/ 'r� Ge st7�sa�.ij,t Ca.f'�re efi 4.r � „ ; �N !/ Mt �L'R' •�/tC . ✓G�.!/ i� 7 4G(C(+r�✓ ee ;! e Av4,C I%44- 64 eg*J GYt4s CvC J14"r& v« per a cc QcGaaHP'f 6q r/s. 7 . _. -40 se �J� 4n aC "urtd�' /CCai o� 2�4fb�erlT�,cfgry cted _ `Q�✓. � G� cw%� � �ivvic�'� 'brsr� $ttve✓ roc' As� ..... ...... .s er QQitJ V\ .3 OATS ;,++ .r ° nH�MM.MweVA. S00%as" ton r sualwi dells n sums flalla 0f EOM Is ltc hwag ti ii�L�u �N►. �. �Mw wrq► srw w.W, ,.,.err 1r.Ir w�a�iw .W�wr � w1p wa v • ....�...... - ' - — .. .. .. .:. .. .. a , .. .. L 14 OIL �_ ,.. f1k" _ 4 r Wm. J. Nelson & Associates _ RCL Box 1666 KENAI. ALASKA SS611 November 22, 1985���• H Nov188g VI'�. City of Kenai 210 Fi dal go St. Nti at Karp Kenai, AK 99611 ;4u its V4011000916 CONSULTw4GeNGINEERS STRUCTURAL / CIVIL / PLANN E18 FIOALGO, SUITE e04 (9prl) eE3 ' ~ A vim' u—"'"'-v0'S TATEMENT N8512 - H.A.S. PROJECT _ J. Professional Services 10/11 through 11/22/853 „' o PRINCIPAL/ENGINEER ' 44.25 hra/75.00" $3,318 75 ' INSPECTOR ?'' • •;;':, {1 254 1d hra/50.00 (ST) :.. J'12 700.00 �; :I r •'•`' i.l� ...4 77.5 hrs/61.50' COT) 4,766.25 ,,. , t�"'� ENGINEER I } . 29 hra/50.00 DRAFTING 1.' i ; �: ..c..i.i`1 ;,{c�s1:': •1. tl 1 •• :....6 ' o" t w'. .2 hrs/3s. / •• :I.` � 11 ; `; 1J :i.l:'s.:�••'i'i ;�ra. .. ' 00 •� ..I•'d .1:�•�.'�t•• �X , r'i.11• ',`• :,+• •'li �..{•.: :. f • ..a.: j1i.. .1,} )7b t* .ti f. •�i,, .i .�' , ' �yr.p{•�..,J. { i .+.:i.l.170.00., . f 33w,•••.. yy�'t •%Lia`J:;:..:CLERICAL :;:.L; 1.. ,..,.; .;' : J'.:;i •:' :.1 i,�.�•.:_ r;. I...t..,,j,c �t �• - l.i�{.:..•t. ` ���...�: ? .::'•';','��,.; I�a•'�'°:+'aaj:; ;'„ :I•.r:.�• '�,,��:'i'%�`II� ��i�� t• � ���.',`j; 4.75 hrs/.?,.1o.00 .. ..,'•• 118.75 /' , :;,+1'•. 1 if'•i{� ' 1•p�. 'Ai �• ..�..Irp{. .)/�, •!ll'.�i. ••'••if�t••,I ,Yrl�1,, �•��.r p•, •y51�1. .�.'I�'1 •�1 •, - Jr SURVEY PERSONNEL +�'. '� /.� r t ••,. •' ra e 2-Man Crew: 20.5 hrs/ 126.50/ 2, 593 25' i V • :. 3-Man Crew: 10.0 hra/ 176.501 19765.00 ...... stall • . .. .T, .. ..:�..}�.. �• .{'''1 (: .1', lr.r.'�, •�,l ..i U1K'I���rrt {.. .. _ .__.. ._ Miscellaneous Expenses: •� ;,. ' •.'. : •1 •'. • • "J'. i.'r.�w % 1.1 it•1?�••f•••t• �i•vi4rr !IM.IF• r:.. c. F I. ~• : , . y•..'• �';'j, nA{•.I r l •• '•L• : w•,{ � 1 1••., l,lr , N a I,.' VEHICLE 1 , t : i.. ... ! i :»;'rr• ; �� .... - -- •t,,L'� 40 days/40.00 '19600.00 LAB ' McLanes #3506 •. 517. 00 -1 Tota' Services 10/ 11 - 11 /22/85: $28, 899. 00� Previously 8illede *58,575.10,e r� _1j,1 Not -to -Exceed Limit: $879474.10 579, 006. 00 o, Previously Received: (589575. 10) -0 Q Balance Due:20,434.90 city Aw. .��.-.,f.Vu114:.=..:_t:Ll]OX:f�SY:. a t�•>: n1gl . S � .. .. 1. ��.�.•.� :,Or • y f f .•. % ... _• .. ,-.1{..:.- _ In E F CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 86-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING THE BID FOR FENCE REPAIR - KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICES FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $139727. WHEREAS, the following bids were received for the above mentioned Fence Repair - Kenai Municipal Airport on March 14, 1986: BIDDER TOTAL BID PRICE Acme Fence Company $419805.00 Scenic Fence 37,147.00 Tim's Landscaping 1269587.00 Alaska Fence Company $199050.00 M.J.P. Construction $199400.00 Peninsula Fence $130990.00 South Central Services $13,727.00 WHEREAS, South Central Services's bid of $13,727 is the lowest responsible bid which meets the bid specifications, and WHEREA4, the recommendation from the Public Works Department and the Airport Manager Is to award the bid to South Central Services for the total amount of $13,727, WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Kenai has determined that awarding this contract to South Central Services for the total amount of $13,727 is in the beet interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the bid for Fence Repair - Kenai Municipal Airport be awarded to South Central Services for the total amount of $13,727, .. 4 - - .. -- -a-- PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of v March, 1986. - ATTESTS Janet WheIany City Clark Q Approved by Finances c'4 Approved by Public oress Approved by Airport Manager: r •_ ;,LTOM WAGONER, MAYOR �:. 1 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 /� CITY OF KENAI (J RESOLUTION NO. 86-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING THE BID FOR FENCE REPAIR - KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO PENINSULA FENCE FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $139990. WHEREAS, the following bide were received for the above mentioned Fence Repair - Kenai Municipal Airport on March 149 1986: BIDDER TOTAL BID PRICE Acme Fence Company $419805.00 Scenic Fence $379147.00 Tim's Landscaping $26,587.00 Alaska Fence Company $199850.00 N.J.P. Construction $199400.00 Peninsula Fence $13,990.00 --**' South Central Services $13,727.00 WHEREAS# South Central Services's bid of $13v727 is declared a non-reeponsible bids and WHEREAS, the recommendation from the Public Works Department and the Airport Manager is to award the bid to Peninsula Fence for the total amount of $139990. WHEREAS# sufficient funds are available. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Kenai has determined that awarding this contract to Peninsula Fence for the total amount of $13,990 is in the best interest of the City. NOWt THEREFOREr BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAIt ALASKA9 that the bid for Fence Repair - Kenai Municipal Airport be awarded to Peninsula Fence for the total amount of $139990. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA$ this 19th day of March, 1986. ATTEST: Janet Whalen y Clerk Approved by -Finances Approved by Public Worket Approved by Airport Managers _ i . s ►. # r,.. oqk y AAN' v1 o L MEMORANDUM TO: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director FROM: Jack LaShot, City Engineer DATE: March 199 1986 SUBJECT: AIRPORT FENCE BID Bide were received Friday, March 14, 19860 to repair several sections of airport fence. Seven bids were received, which is about twice as many as usual for this type of project. Our bid specs say "The contractor shall have and keep current a contractor's license and a business license for the duration of the project." The low bidder, South Central Services ($139727) owned by Tim Twohyp submitted his bid without the contractor's license, however, he stated that it wee applied for. I've since asked for a copy of the application. The application is dated 3-16-86 and the bid was 3-14-86. Therefore, he had not really applied for the license at the time of bid, which according to the State Division of Occupational Licensing is contrary to State law. Also, the application is for a "Mechanical/Mechanical Repair" specialty type contractor's license, which the State may not recognize as a specialty and which really doesn't relate to fence repair. In talking with the Insurance Cache, the low bidder has applied for bonding and insurance, as required for the State license. They indicated that the bond and insurance should be no problem, considering hie experience and financial statement, and that the contractor's license is usually granted by the State if these items are obtained. I have been talking with the City Attorney on this matter. He may have an opinion regarding the award of the project at the Council meeting. I INAI PENINSULA BOROUGH BOX 850 • 80LDOTNA. ALASKA 99669 PFtONe Z62.4441 - ----- i... . .... .. ......I , March 7, 1986 City of Kenai `.. Atten: Janet Whelan 210 lidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 RE: 1966 Liquor License Renewal Application for: - -.- -- -- One -Stop (Boy's Ltd.), Package Store Dear Janet: -o. Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough has no s recommendation for protest of the above noted liquor license ;.,•, based upon unpaid taxes. One -Stop is not yet built and therefore has no sales taxes or - personal property taxes which are due. The owner is aware that registration for sales tax collection and remittance is dues within ten days after he opens for business. Other tax accounts registered in the applicant's name are also current at this time. .' Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sinc ely, segioll 16 /iCC tip' MA81986 Pamela A. McKee � ,�,Tr Delinquent Acct. Techn. �! f`' a E 64 W �� • w � O ALASKA ru sNi��o, co+Riwor� � ORPARTMBNT ON RB'VBNUB 550 W. 7th Avenue ALCgh WCBEVERAQEW MbL smD Anchorage* Alaska 99501 March 3, 1986 Janet Whelan. Clerk , City of Kenai ', 210 Fidelgo �• `�s`` Kenai, AK 99611 '�$4,, 61?%1�' Dear Ms. Whelan: ve are in receipt of the following application(s) for renewal liquor license(*) within the City nt Kenai You are being notified as required by AS O4.11 320. PACKAGE STORE LICENSE ONE STOP E th • A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the applicstionts) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the board and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons in support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If s protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Instead# in secordenae with AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, if not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing In accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQURSTS A WAS NO, TUE MUNICIPALITY MUST CONS FORWARD AT THE HEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) municipalities most inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which prohibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please, do so in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.14S(a) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to protest an application if a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. - 4 If a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or - consumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed promises and so _ variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us ad provide a certified copy of the regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OFj ALCOHOLIC BEVBRAGES AS REQUIRED BY -ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS O4.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that In mind in responding to this notice. Under AS O4.11.310, if applicable, a notice is slao being provided to the appropriate community council 1 within your municipality. etty alhoon Remo s 6 Licensing Supervisor _ (907) 277-8638 --- - - ,4. r ME - Ir V • [[OfgN INOIY104 CTPOINIWOtYlti[NINFORNIMMI �1 tMRna•u tnwrn •iaam nroi«en•1 Kwaeaoww tetll tl•i•C•••Ill t«•MMiMI n•IlenWL%bptry"Wftn, k•Ir•Iglnt, Me YI•F O tY • 4 O �iC%• dCgt « P.O. eel^�3 So h• Re160% Mess• 1seN1 « �� awu•w.ea•.0 bAw►s 263-'J its _ SA C p M b � ae 401 241� Sb • 5s 85 •laws os nrm •seat• 1•• eralw roM trim •oaealea► rtecOro•nt• rt••rou SOi.� 9 !: r- R Q6 QtnytaAE�IC • _.w''v • ptn•1« � • . 4ott 92aa 6tIJdA k• 9g66 Itatl tne•Nrtlliront .. ..... 283- sits C costom to I.1 N am n 3!i'!- 54-*ISIS M1 elAuk•su n«o. • oagw rear ofAt•Is• tiiol�e. Kim ecoi•ats•► rarseaM tee • 10 10 Ste-✓etAv trlq>L• I W 0 O [AOKO YNLL Mua a a ut • of •patunona a7 � a eereaW Mow no• atl a a iaa . � n •sr onMr a ••ra•e• NO• '(3M nwaawuouxnm«•unawandlou"m«xan•aanm•ut•N as a •sore•«« • tan•• a r'sI'� • ` i ' , . ENO Ov[9 ... ntwa••mH•t•nrranorttq I "event ""OVAGO"m igloo loom Ue cww" a caoa a on a • •+a • ONO Oveo llm'o •ta•ttltatoans e ten b aWq Wq rotbn GMN- [ N man b•nwaerarom amWOtn•nt• I deelefe w"? PMalM of Mat 1 htr etratn16 this applbatica, Inaludlnp the OCM"nlirtp 6011e101se and ssst«Mnb, and to 00 h!d Of My MWA4110 and hONNIN t b true Correct end aamplNw ( and d with At! a.11A60. mipFWW and dellutes endI arrest In ihi 1Ioin�aMf nq A" mt Ot IMI1001 �ouP Mr Milli a of i of Il nanals! Ilmsebusiness, t"mto prodd s all bbnndlon rpuNad by the A100hollo ft -9e ftdf01 EOatd In euppon Of thl• *WIC&tioe. N aOplloattOn is for a brefip 018PMt W of pasiupe Stet Ilo - M A I OOnlMthat *Wh spolaM nanMO on Mla appllostlon has lMldad In the 410% 10 Alaska la at Iwp One Wt pdw to Me date of this ap011oNlon: andw the applicant b a corporation npldOnd and Qualified to do business M Me date of Abehe for One year prior to the date of this appll0alkm% or all of the shanholden hm rsi000 In the elate of AlUb for at bed one leer pdol to this date Of MU appll0atien. « w1a IN emm Um amm to the own uegle• • •. .a �.. • y * ... a .�� A �T ....•„+eq.d.r �•pi f Maw loth t1f10 10 before me MIS dub•O and and aware re bef01e Ica cab Y,• t . 4 C1 1 + ... ...I . �•.1 • MFOontnlUmnOwn r� r• rtc c_rr:rtc NpO0lamIs01011�tCi1�'• � r . t. exuaAtex• Akp»Ntp me som anato Move M+ tan / OF a UAUOR LICENSE APPLICATION tMa calf.» •te t N el• ero tare. I n � ' f1 ` Y IWN1W/MgopwNMa I Tni$oateettNnra+6MOtnn) WAtan••Ntea pplMYq eneetWlnp A.ttOtNttIN A weemwlalaY a utena K1110•: N ikek s Stove ucensein .............. 0 '160.00 r {�tttetl wd tt•aola,. 1q�7 Filing Fee ............... • so.on O RM)ahr of l(e•na Neltef a ied aaFOV Agony pl tNmbH ..... • v. Gain" Nanl• O ttenl}ter of toosuon E fate ticamltMt ........... is $ OO• CO am go (Ipee+•N0It GramepNae M Ra + ONE, S'1'C ORS nto"tl M Aoy�a L imitea 1 K`ro►s , Ah 44'We • ovkc Stop Gly P.D. box .y23b heNg1 A. Sote.l h o'� AAk. al qPUR 2B3 � 91 3 0 Other _ I NNwla not 1M um TURN wY aacu•eawu pp iql Oaai ova aNO un»e(tealY•nwte(tN �•1 tit a et � FA t m»n w eom•NNe tr all a Nplomwl& on N p trnero tl pumver »�Nm•�qrr errllr •INatneaYpl.wwwmunwWwo •ounenN• •muntrk 0 C OOmwommam" �IexaYeem O�NYYMMNMN NaN oaextttlytoototoeter %3 wt;tgotexaalYetn 2.1 VIOSs t UGOFVNWIW919 IaewY»nYHY»Itoouoo sminomontAI �$ iatlry OMNrt.(wy rtoroaveNketo OrtwwamNerottmrax.n •r 11p»ININarMlNuual•Ap�rnalM•wxY»YwucN»o».nr»ugryn�e�mw•awonecan.aaoeNaa»a1MNaY»o»omea•auM»au»aaNtY I .. — !::� - •. �1t�»eee��wurary»N•Yw»»Natwe.nuw»w�N�•»a.»oewwlavoanxaYaa»eomaalaxr»oalronolwnoaq»nNrowuanxaaxY I � .�, ; ,. int01M•M �ta•YOOIMNIMrpaa rle Nt0. aaM0.aonamne. aolxaae aMta atomW .... ... 1 IIMN FOA *am»N Iwb�r MM.M.Oaro»Ibm on u a•tIIM NH »Y� �OmltM01 AbonNl»- me OO Ig IOnOM»N aiMeO»»nanlM N»t•MmMI 10 I _ ... .. ... . ova 11 yn mil a1 Y» etapnn Oita O tl8M "Ns, anion" want wlanam (root eeee4 N L Tt1A SM 11111110111MATIOM ra Itsmo r of utem Naar a unsw of teanon emsuil lie anwu 1 aaaW M. p YN (aerMY NON) mnl nY umea NY aOnto bilry or* O Municipality (SWIM O other low rerltr•Attrr Twnr. a Neenaa later aaptrmtoMam• rtaaN •Ilxta•Nwe aoonnama ahoNtp GahYtl a tMy.Mm.. O twYmeme atYMe O comma am snusm w•xwmlwMA WestYSAManpo v r N M►OMA N A 0 leap a amgNNa N "No at C"Doom u a mien mr rN t�o $ �.11Ni'fCd 64ft St0 a N" In the 1/Z11$S tw . » t'.O. trbo% 4233 klhAi $ 1Ar ' So dothn; AK. ggbb9 �ke.In 14{gat • 28b- 9113 Ro ev Qo d iPres;d•�t ItmroatalN� tewiwamaeMr 10 RO. O "S.S. cal '{bb1 Z$3. A us mrp ON nr•rN•rtarNriaelNexxta•eatrway•h•"$WarArwearalmYlatxmmmewscanmteOpmeopwa. aowotlmmofnwmn moaroetotowue funwntaw~60 eatlttam•a OmNmtle rat ltenm •N ea• NYm Aerx• oar a wit Ro Cti &w Leoyck -awl,zaa 7 zi Mq gD!b R►tri A all; • o ,.: n ST87E ALASKA AUa J DWARTMB11T'1' OF RBVBNUB 550 W. 7th Avenue /IUVH0L/CBE�VERAtiFQaIVIA1pJLBCi4RD Anchorage, Alaska 99501 March 11, 1986 Janet Whelan, Clerk �'�, •A�'�� City of Kenai4�c�•9� 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Ms. Whelan: We are in receipt of the toil C1iY o�iP Kena ionce) for *raneggr liquor license(a) within the You are being notified as required by AS 04.11.520. - BEVERAGE DISPENSARY LICENSE Y' Casino Bar; Casino, Inc., P-Peggie Garnand, VP -Bobby Garnand, S/T-Sharon McKenzie; 605 Main Street; MAIL: P.O. Box 657, Kenai, AK 99611. Transferred e from: Same d/b/a, location & mail; Casino Bar, Inc and Rachel Rogers. -- - - - , 6 A local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the applicationts) pursuant to A$ O4.11.480 by furnishing the 1 d itttt t t t of board aM the applicant with a a ear as coac se wr ea s a amen reasons in support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. It a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, c capricious and unreasonable. Instead, in accordance with AS 04.11.510(b). the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated.in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, it not satisfied by the informal conference. is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A NEARINGO 188 MUNICIPALITY MUST COME FORWARD AT THE NEARING WITH EVIDENCE AND ARGUNOT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. _ Under AS O4.11.420(a). the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance ' prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a -- - -'- variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) municipalities must inform the board of zoning regulations ti - or ordinances which prohibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic u beverages. ` If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in _ the prescribed manor and within the prescribed time. Please show proof _.. of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 1S AAC 104.14S(c) the board will great a local governing body an extension of 30 days is which �I- to protest an application if a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. I It a municipal zoning regulation or ordinance, prohibits the sale or J consumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us and provide a certified copy of the regulation or ordinance it you have not previously done so. PROTEST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND THE PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOEOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED R ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER AS O4.11.420(a) ARE TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that In mind in responding to this notice. Under AS O4.21.310, it applicable, a notice is also being provided to the appropriate community council within your municipality. I I , S cerely. etty alhoon Rego s 6 Licensing Supervisor 1907) 277-8638 L Vaal " os a AlPaaenni�i,•apttitltnteoata LIQUOR UCENSE APPLICATION I� ISLj . Fall INAII00*avoft" ft'As ow lam 0. "16 ISte•(411M•«M WAttNltallaef«p« QTIrWTannO MD�.�. ="d K A. tt0[NI/INttOaMATgN MuMMWOMaNwIgN a 1CNMn• rbeverage L711nhertl ® TltagfM of Uestla Halth r O T WAW of to0ttbn Oiapensary UCen a In ........ illlnpl4N.........��y� lialletgr of eppitN•bis) ..... Tout subnNlhd ........... I/aS'A.0 I �0�� O•aCl.Ifanc• r rnW r 92-0072356 I 85-0204 O on1A trWOTa TauM�ottr•IaaN •PvaN CASINO BAR, INC. P.O. box 857 Kenai. AK 99611 • rlawrs4leulta Casino Bar Inc. p111011f ItiMuntolWlh Kenai O other a o . • 505 Main Street Kenai AK 99611 283-9992 I,a•ass« tIM IKMaW «Wel a ro 90V O ONO nW•Aa«rwlrwm U—cn—ow III; WHOW TO W UCINIl4 Ma« no cont0 - to aU a IOM aWta MaoMH Mp« N I CaaiRO Bar IRC'na°"e'h0a""°oio.°"«wMro'nrn'ewt"„' . W�0 pNYN►WNMrI NN N.tlltlltbTllM p111M00WICYM. • r O omm um W TIN• it1 MLW gr11 ao rWtN 8 i ObMlta,aamoroiteN legal GarrONW, legal N Q UOINIYD FA Par Nar one eo11rIN a lagagn loA N . -. `� tOnoe•oPProPNor tp .. u' - O [wtlWl PiONIq O rIw wtlwr» O eaoens eaaeMo O Plam WOTMIe t• PA rrWYt '� OOIq�aNrlinonwnoANga•«oaoT«arOrwraonaMueTtNo.lMAlopaTnwTOo•tnwoneoonoaaNaWlanaMoonwKnaneOaMeuMoalMpaallo ... ... _ .. . a DowWa0.W11011MNNP oIe•allw•bOnabOwweeaolrm b000le,WMe,mnWTp, 00waatl TMla.mtW. Pimq•POnMn oltM 11oaPW1UlO0eNalloe.NNN _ _ _ :.. TtpMWbmotris rMtMNq arNMib EWrMWera r111 aoM. Mrae. WWWNnaN. PWIwMO Nebr abne.l I - - Lid If 11% iW INFO OMO . P« IMn•a•1 1NttoA - M N arnunM tlNa1WINMM nMCWM OnNNq•Nn11M"Na II the MMIAbllN1a11aTa1A«Owai�' 4CNtaNttarMWpCWntt«•WWtWt ,- •�• c .1:� i O vat; N ra• WnM• nWr NIONrWtn ONO ❑ YI6 n pW.mu• nor IMalaal natrnNt Ka1T OreN4 F = - - ONMU Q VMSFM INFORMATION. r« nansw ot LWNW NNOar or tromnr at totatlott arutono onto 0 11'M) 1 NNN 1 NMra CASI110 BAR, IIJC. Casino Bar Inc. OS0204 Rachel Rogers OWN Afton or coo ntty- 505 I.tein street `aMunicipality pp•01114 Kenai n eaverace pisoensary Kenai, AK 99811 O0"w 1W •IrrlTtrPMnrM of Limp NNW *nf"bN onto OWN tlralr WMNgoauTNM pbMne OMaYW of cap 4 O 00MMS atwiw O Ooeutow mI WOMAN nwwvrAw twa tolaeeolwaava>x —j OIOTIO RATION INFORMAWOU. Muss a N ttwW1 «oo• t n W Casino, Inc. eAa Casino Bar Inc. r of rtCpOr "Moo 1W1MMaWA 6/7/79 P709 BOX 657 Not N W wevicavoRim— 505 Main Street Kenai,.AK 99611 Kenai. AK 99611 283-9992 Carl Qarson NWTawm9wilaw— t 9 NYWNNIIIa1N11W. .,. P.O. CK 4O , Kenai, AR' 99611 Q!YU ONO 1MottMtlo•NecarPWrNgrmmowaMd" Am•Mpwa jmaa aosNAtaaTtfeaneTbblrobeatotl6 ION atic"waslota►Nmolua on•tanlonaoAwnnNawrW Ma l 11tnMaWlolbeWrw NNeailaalMa - ooa«�wla Peg le Oarnalid `' P.O.• VG i '857 Bob Oernand . 4n �.p: 1l tfd7onai, Sharon McKenzie -AK 10120/27 .�.... „ . t1LlMtaoMlgpa r - QI .r . .A2 `a1M8KA UUUUN UUft Mta ArPaawaaa 01�� Nt0MMAf/QOWOR GM tIM Nai0reWMYA 1MM1KMeY ary11 Yee Peggie Uarnand M P.O. Box 857, Aenai . Aft Mrs arras rrwl 605 Westwood Ct. Kent • 4 907-283-4081 907-; 11/9/41 n 248- rWWMYWrcs emerygoon, Presadent 16 M Sharon McKenzie a4ellM M P.O. Box 884 Anch. AK 99 Y « Yo 3704 Terrace Drive 99502 907-243-1485 Ya 10/20/37 1 471- a nYee Ya eeMl. 25 Secretery Op it. 1 toll AYCOIIPOIIATe 0pple! Y-ir i ONO M or 1Yreorete o 1wr awid am gn— Myn NyeaaYetl WOM"n" Casino Liquor 505 Main Stree Kenai, AK 9961 85-0627 enlr QNo a ramaeq nano a erM OM rllrat0lnpYYlrllblbwYa BMW— lM igl/reYe .ptpptYegoYeYlp MHO Ova o yea oo mm 1M www" 001. ONLARMOOL unteermw4an 1 dootan ondar paMI1Y Of OUry tnn t haute alY my MOWNP and be M It N Irur aanYYt and 11wmor ar01y that I hale nod and am IAMIIIl 110 "Moll other than MN appII"N l) a floor* I SON* t0 Provide all IMelnullon rpulrod bV 0 11 YOptaoatMDrl is for a 9Werspe ollpMaary or R 01 Allsia (Or tl I/Ht one year Prior to tM date the atate at AlaaMa for an year Pleat to 1M dal "Of PdOr #0 OW date of MIS applaeatlda. a awelnU Casino Bar Inc. 6 t tiY0a0dt110 and opal l�,�IOfa nN7ri n day of Mr dommil"I 1 ara LA. lull 23L NEI Via ."inuMmomm.01 a rimmorzimmi -man .mmmosommumm,l WIN "MMEMENIMMUNN - "Mwwi�jwmml 1pfam I mummummuman AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING " MARCH 59 1986 - 7s00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2, Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and =- will be approved by one motion. There will be no'`'� separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its :'.. normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (10 Minutes)- -- C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance 1107-85 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code Exempting Personal Property from Taxation s. Substitute Ord. 1107-85 2. Ordinance 1114-86 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code -' Bring Personnel Regulations in Compliance with Fair la Labor Stendacde Act 3. Ordinance 1118-86 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Adopting Uniform Building, Sign & Related Codes ° a. Substitute Ord. 1118-86 4. Resolution 66-18- - Transfer of Funds-" Lake, Marine, Granite Pt. - B. Nelson Inspection - $69947 5. Resolution 86-19 - Transfer of Funds - Repair and , Maintenance of City Vehicles - $259000 6. Resolution 86-20 - Transfer of Funds - Hire Temporary Employee - Clerk's Office - $300 ` 71. Renewal -of Liquor License - •a. Runway Lounge ' b. Kenai Merit Inn 0. MINUTES . - - _ - -.-•,.- . 1. "Regular Meeting, Feb. 19 1986 2. "Verbatimg Feb. 199 1986 rg ' i• E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Alaska Office Management & Budget - 5 Year Leasing Program Outer Continental Shelf Oil & Gas F. OLD BUSINESS r , . ;a - 'wP..41IR;+•«w�iR:-.:M��� •,.. ...: 1 - .. .. •-f- .0 : • r a r _ 11 P 1. Library Expansion - C. Gintoli - Amendment 03 2, Main St, Loop, Marine, Granite Pt., FBO - B. Nelson Amendment !1 and Authorisation to Pay - G. NEW BUSINESS 7 k '1. Bills to be Paidq Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $19000 t' 3. *Ordinance 1117-86 - Re -Allocating Road Grant - $1,517; _ Returning Road Moneys to General Fund - $159298 4. *Ordinance 1119-66 - Paving Eagle Rock Or., LID - $459000 5. Discussion - Commissions & Committees - Appointments, Replacements, Minutes -' 6. Discussion - Street Light Report 7. *Games of Chance & Skill - Eagles 03525 . -- H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor 4, City Clerk S. Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning-- 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9, Library Commission I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD (5 Minutes) ADJOURNMENT a r - �. .'+ Il-'-"w4.i+-o.J.F..f:.r-•1�ariirkn'.:.:b4'n. . 'x a.a,..,,,tx'�th'iAl�I�fiJ f�'•,»c.•.Mi�r..�nn:�::iLi� - ' -- -:�'bf?_-. 77 .. - .., - 1 - ., •� �. a ,- �_ ., 9 .. _ .. _ F. KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES MARCH 5, 1986, 7$OO PM KENAI CITY HALL j. MAYOR TON WAGONER PRESIDING PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL ; presents Sally Sallie, Jess Hall, Ray Meseles, Chris Monfort John Wise, Tom Wagoner, Tom Ackerly '. Absent$ None A-1. Agenda Approval 0. Mayor Wagoner asked that item C-1, Amendment, distributed this date, be considered. Is. Mayor Wagoner asked that item G-0, Retainage, Construction Jobe, be added to the agenda. 0. Mayor Wagoner asked that Old Town Discussion be added under item I-1. V Council approved the agenda as amended. - A-2 Consent Agenda MOTION$ -" Councilmen Maaeles moved, seconded by Councilman Ackerly, to Y approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. a Motion passed by unanimous consent. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD } None : •- . , C. PUBLIC HEARINGS dr C-1 Ord. 1107-05 - Amending KMC - Exempting Personal Property From Taxation a. Subst. Ord. 1107-05 ,1�r MOTION$ Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Sallie, to _? adopt the ordinance. MOTION, Amendments Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Mentor, to ='fi emend the ordinance per Finance Director Brown's memo dated March 5, 1906. F. VOTE, Amendments Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. PUBLIC COMMENT $ -� a. Ruby Coyle, 1412 Barabers, Kenai. 1) The Borough and have looked of a broad •' - the City, since lnoocpoeatlon, tax bees. That City !s making !t smeller by exempting psesonal operty. 2) Has the City Attorney reviewed this to eproe !f some personal property could be exempt and all companies are not? This could be the some as equal There the Longevity program regarding treatment. are a lot of psap a with real peopsety and not personal property. We see putRing the burden on the real property owners.' KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 5, 1906 Page 2 Councilmen Mice replied, 1) He agreed with a broad tax base, but only 60% of the people with personal property pay the tax. It is an honor eyetem. Many people with real property do not show any personal property. Some people are not paying because they did not know, but a lot have never Piled. 2) It is unfair that renters paying sales tax and property tax to the owner by the rent payment are then charged personal property tax. He has 10% off as a home owner. 3) IP the City shows a good tax climate, we will generate jobs. The lose is $659000 to $70,000, that is peanuts with our budget. It will encourage people to come to the City and stay. Councilman Ackerly noted there are declining revenues, not just oil -related but all cities in the country. $65,000 is not peanuts. Because some people do not pay Is not any reason we should not go out and get It. Regarding a good tax climate, 1.9 mills is one of the cheapest in America. We have done a lot to make a good tax climate. It to hard to complain about government when you do not pay taxes. Councilmen Measles said $65,000 to $70,000 Is 20% mill. Most of the items taxed are luxury items. If this to not in the budget, it will have to be made up by property owners. If there Is a problem collecting, that is a problem of the system. VOTE, !lain Motion as Amended (Failed): Yea$ Wlee Nos Beilie, Hall, Measles, Monfor, Wagoner, Ackerly C-2 Ord. 1114-86 - Amending KMC - Bring Personnel Regulations in Compliance with Fair Labor Standards Act NOTION* Councilmen Hassles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfor, to adopt the ordinance. There was no public comment. �r Councilmen Ackerly asked if the employee has additional time, the City hoe the option of comp or overtime? Finance Director Brown replied yea, the department head will make the decision. If comp time Is given, it has to be time and ^ 1/2 if over the current week. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-3 Ord. 1116-66 - Amending KMC - Adopting Uniform Building, Sign 6 Related Codes s: a. Substitute Ord. 1110-86 MOTION* Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilmen Homeless to ...... adopt the ordinance. MOTION, Amendment* Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded byy Councilwoman Mentor, to emend the ordinance with aubstituta Ord. 1116-86 as : submitted. There wee no public comment. Councilman Ackerly asked if this effects the City sign cods. + Answer, no. Building Inspector Hackney explained the rates have not changed since 19690 it is still beneath the u Increase in cost -of -living- Soldotne goes by evaluation .zf y `' the houyioquere footage. Councilman Miae caked, why isnhe yyndbn ooet being taken out. Me* °m ot ` -KENAI CITY COUNCIL NARCH 3, 1966 Page 3 Heokney replied, a 2-story house is listed ae 1/2 the coot. This does not reflect the actual cost of construction. Motion passed unanimously by roll cell vote- . C-4 Rea. 86-16 - Tranef. of Funds - Lake, Marine, Granite Pt. '. B. Nelson Inspection - $6,947 MOTIONt Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfort . to adopt the resolution. There wee no public comment. Public Works Director Kornelie reviewed the differences c """ between this and Arch. Gintol!'e contract. He distributed material. He added, Mr. Nelson did apply for payment for work done during the period Aug. 1 to Aug. 15. There is no difference between this and Mr. Gintol!'s. Councilman Ackerly asked if the City to charged for a full day after completion. Mr. Kornelis explained, this is more then just a punch list. The 14 day extension was at the City's request. Substantial completion on both jobs vies done within the time, but neither was complete. Councilman Vise asked !f Mr. Neleon gave timely notice for s ;, the additional work. Me. Kornelie replied, with both contract:, the City ie not obligated because they did not give timely nolioe plue what they billed us for was within the time limit. Councilman Wise asked for an opinion from the project manager. He added, the main problem is formal notice of additional work wee not requested. Did Mr. Nelson or hie repeeeentative, prior to contract date, make application for additional funds? Mr. Kornelie replied, in to ask for both oases he did not know they were going additional funds till they came to Council. Councilman Vise asked Me. Kornelie If he was :were the projects had delays. they still doing work. Mayyne Mr. Kornelis replied, yes. are Wagoner said they have a 20S clause that covers additionol _ stock, When they bid the contract, they knew It was in there. Mr. Kornelie noted one Is 20%, the other is 30 day. ; Councilman Hall asked if there were liquidsting damages to .E the contract with Mr. Nelson. Hr. Korn lie replied no, they _ went 1.4 days beyond completion date but there were change It the -, orders to 14 days. Councilwoman Dellis asked change orders gave specific time to complete. Mr. Kornelie explained, when change orders are submitted to Council, the time required is stated. Councilwoman Baiife asked if Administration looked at the inspection contracts to see o if it will fell in the change order. Me. Kornelie replied, to tell the City !n writing.. the burden Is on the Inspectors It hoe to go to Council. Atty. Rogers stated, the Administration's position Is, the City is not legally obligated to pay this. If Council disagrees, okay. but it It is found to bs an unauthorized expenditure of public funds, there are ramifications and exposure of the City and Council. VOTE (Failed)t Motion felled unanimously by roll call vote. C-3 Ree. 86-ig - Tranef. of Funds - Repair and Maintenance o/ City Vehicles $23t000 - -a• MOTIONt Councilwoman Mentor moved, seconded by Councilmen Naaslast to adopt the resolution. Qs 4,L 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL -MARCH 9, 1986 • Page 4 ^ There waa no public comment. x , Notion pmooed by unanimous consent. y. C-6 Res. 66-20 - Tranef. of Funds Hire Temporary Employee s Clerk's Office - $300 ". MOTION& e Councilman Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfort to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. Motion passed by unanimous consent. C-7 Renewal of Liquor License - 9 .. a. Runway Lounge b. Kenai Merit Inn Clerk Whelan reported, the Runway Lounge is one month behind 1�• in their lease payments, but taxes ere current. Atty. Rogers recommended not protesting the renewal of liquor license. Clerk Whelan reported Merit Inn is current. NOTION& Councilman Measles moved, seconded by Councilmen Hall, that a letter of non -objection be sent to ABC regarding Runway Lounge and Merit Inn. 0. MINUTES 0-1 Regular Meeting, Feb. 19, 1986 0-2 Verbatim, Feb. 199 1986 Approved by Consent Agenda. E. CORRESPONDENCE E-1 AK Office of Management 6 Budget - S Year Leasing Program - Outer Continental Shelf Oil 6 Dee Council took no action. ° F. OLD BUSINESS F-1 Library Expansion - C. Ointoli - Amendment 13 MOTIONt Councilman wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Sallie, to approve payment. --- .----_-- -- Councilman wise @eked if there was significant work to be ,> done as of this date. Public Kooks Director Kornelis There replied 10 hours, according to Mr. 0intoli's memo. doors to be replaced and summer work. Councilmen wise are asked if he recommended the City do the work. Mr. Kornella if we require him to do !t, we would renagotiste replied no, his contract. It would be beyond the 30 dsy limit. Architect 0intoll. He wrote a letter to Mc. Kornalls. Mr. -, Kornells did not have an objections Nr. 0lntoli made n= uired." reference to "aa�oe defects, inspection is sqNa feels he is enti led to charges regarding Atty. Rogers remarks they are major defecte. The teohnlcslity of not =- - .< aakinqq it in writing is the only objection. All doors in to be replaced. Three is each work to be the llbraey have done with the doors. $29000 amendment will cover him to:y i _ - �t t KENAI CITY COUNCIL a MARCH S, 1986 Page ! June 16 when the to dsosping In done. Mayor Wagoner asked $" why he was doing the work running down the hardwere, etc* he is Stater there" with a contractor on line. If out of should be some recourse against the contractor. Mr. Ointoll explained. the replacement doors have to be Inspected, All - <: sloe Is done. The contract to clear as to extra inspection. Mr. Kornalis sold the City was billed for reinepection but q In construction and Inspection contracts it cells for a substantial and final inspection. If the work Is faulty, the contractor in held liable. Mr. Gintoli noted he made 3 -- Inspections, the 3rd is the one he billed the City for. - a VOTE (Passed) vest Beille, Hall, Meealea, Monfort Wiee " Not Wagoner, Ackerly F-2 Main St. Loop, Marine, Granite Pt., FBO - 0. Nelson Amendment 01 A Authorization to Pay Engineer 8111 Nelson. He was presented at the meeting with Information he did not have before. It is hard to discuss without review. He wrote a letter to Council last week,itJ': has not been answered. He did not understand how his situation is different from Mr. Gintoll's. It is a contract -' obligation of the City. Mayor Wagoner said it was not, it was decision of Council to make an exception to the contract. Mr. Nelson said Council did not agree with Atty. Rogere that it was an unauthorized expense. Mayor Wagoner sold the vote was taken regarding Mr. Gintoll-e oontraot. We must address this contract. Mr. Nelson sold 1) there Is some ambiguity in the bill. His Interpretation was the contract was not subject to increases unless it continued 20Z beyond the working date, et which time the whole contreat was up for renegotiation. Administration says y just the 20% sddltional ie up for renegotiation. It wi11 require a legal opinion. 2) He is still working on the n contract. He didn't know if he should be aing for all or just part. He does not know where he stand:.sk3) Why was 'a this work performed? Because during the course o/ construction, he felt it wan to the benefit of the City to ask the contractor to do the work. Sewer service was not In the original proposal, it would have to be re- done if it was not a change order. The City approved that and additional wotk to contract. They were not added on to the and of the contract, but in the middle and added 14 days to the job. This Inspection was done a month ahead of the and of the contract. lie did not know this would take him beyond the and of the contract date. Mayor Wagoner asked, when he reviewed the contract with the City, wea he " :were of the 20% stipulation? Mr. Nelson replied no. Mr. o Kornells noted Mr. Nelson': point wee well token. The Inspection contreat was for the robthe City added to his II; job. Mayor Wagoner recommended dminiatration rovlow, this with Mr. Nelson. - Council agreed to the recommendation. V 0. NEW BUSINESS 0-1 Bill* to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTION, Councilwoman Monfor moved, seconded by Councilman #seats@, to approve the bills as submitted. Motion passed by unanimous consent. KENAI CITY COUNCIL L MARCH 5, 1986 _ Page 6 ; 0-2 Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 MOTION$ �= Councilmen Measles moved, eeoonded by Councilwoman Monfort to approve the requisitions as submitted. Nation passed by unanimous consent. C-3 Ord. I M-86 - Re -Allocating Road Grant - $1,5171 Returning Road Noneye to General fund - $15,296 C-4 Ord. 1119-86 - Paving Eagle Rock Dr., LID - $45,000 Approved by Consent Agenda. -�•- -- G-S Disc. - Commissions 8 Committees - Appointments, Replacements, Minutes Mayor Wagoner explained, the Charter and the Code state the Mayor appoints, the Council confirme. He suggested a work session to discuss comm. 8 comm- poliolee- Councilmen Ackerly said he had a copy of HEA Board policies, he this be reviewed. Mayor Wagoner asked Clerk suglan to prepare a standard orgested Whedinance. Clerk Whelan reviewed the memo in the packet regarding appointments and minutes. Mayor Wagoner suggested hiring an individual to if take minutes and transcribe them at a nominal fee to see it works. Clerk Whelan noted Council and PfiZ minutes have to be done by someone who knows the legal requirements of taking minutes. Councilwoman Bailie said she had a problem with asking volunteers to take minutes. They become ineffective if they have to do this during discussions. She suggested a part time person - NOTION$ Councilwoman Nonfat moved, seconded by Councilmene Ackerly, that the Clerk contact JOAnn Phillips (Career Center), the Job Service and Georgia Alexander to do minutes on a c temporary on -call basis without a number of hours promised on an hourly wagb. Mayor Wagoner noted this could be developed by Adminietration and brought to Council. MOTION, Withdraw$ ' Councilwoman Monfort with consent of second, withdrew her " motion. 3c Council agreed to direct Administration to come back with • proporal for someone to take minutes of comm. 8 COMM* L. meetings. G-6 Disc. - Street Light Report Councilwoman Nonfat said she has people from the same subdivision calling her over again. She asked for the status. Public Works Director Kornalle explained, HEA is doing repairs, some were shot out the some week they were repaired. He is working on replacements. 0-7 Games of Chance 8 Skill. Raglan 03515 Approved by Consent Agenda. M. e .. V � KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH St 1986 _ Page 7 0-0 Rotsinage . Construction Jobe Mayor Wagoner explained, he has discussed this with - contractors. With interest rates going down, are we on a fixed rate of interest to pay cetainege? Finance Director Brown said the rate Is not fixed. It ie going down. - - - ;-- H. REPORTS • H-1 City Manager None H-2 City Attorney Atty. Rogers spoke. a. He may be requesting an executive session on price 8 _— •, ability to get natural gas. He attended a seminar that was good. Kenai price is very good. On -going z. negotiations will effect the finanose of the City. He will meet with Ray Beniech (Enstar) this month. `4 b. Regarding litigation. There will be a number of new cases. The economic climate is pact of the problem. We have to enforce our contracts, lessee. insurance. J. 1��Council should be ewero they may be eppsoached by A—.---f' litigants. He asked Council to refer them to the Legal _ ...- dept. or cell him. Some may went to come to Council 3 =.ez �'1G also. c� H-3 Mayor -. Mayor Wagoner spoke. •. Recreation Commission. He recommended Jerry Caeloon Council agreed to the suggestion. Councilwomen Bsille asked If there were any women (.. applicants. Mayor Wagoner replied he did not know of any. He further recommended Steve Dexheimer me an ` ri alternate to attend but not vote. Councilwoman Bailie noted there were 2 women applicants. Mayor Wagoner said he would delay the appointment and review the Councilwoman Emilie noted women use the gplicents. a Center as much as men and should be represented. b. Planning 8 Zoning Commission. He recommended Hml' Smalley and Ozzie Osborne be reappointed. Council agreed to the suggestion. c. Council on Aging. He recommended 3oAnn Buzzell and Sus Chinn. --'..-- Council agreed to the suggestion. d. Borough Resource Development Council will be having a meeting March G. He suggested Council attend. ---- , H-4 City Clerk Clerk Whelan spoke. at She will be attending the Clerk's Seminar in Fairbanks = =` March 9 to March 14. r KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH S, 1986 n 1�►r _ Page B { b. $he reminded Council of the woek session March 11 on the HAS project. c. She reminded Council of the Public Hearing on the Float ° Plane Basin March 20. i v d. A telephone poll was conducted Feb. 21, 1906 regarding repair work on City equipment. S Council members said yea, 2 were unable to contact. er e. KPCC will be having a workshop March 14, on the agenda - - ;y,q;;..:. Is a session on Roberts Rules of Order. She suggested Council members, Comm. 6 Comm. members attend if - - -=- - possible. H-S Finance Director -- None N-b Planning 6 Zoning `•, `. Councilman Wiee reported the hearing on the Borough landfill permit. The iesue is grandfather rights. He asked Atty. Rogers to look at the proposal, justify and provide P6Z with a legal opinion regarding applicability of request and of the Code. Mayor Wagoner asked that copies be eant to :- - -- - Council. H-7 Harbor Commission None ° "' h•r=`� H-8 Recreation Commission ... -� r. t Recreation Ofeeotoc Mc01111vrey spoke. +: -iS. i-vrs`--._� ..._•.... Fes. ,. � r ----•- . a. He attended a meeting in Wash. D.C. for 3 days regarding the Presidents Council on Americans Outdoors. 4 attended from Alaska. a b. Regarding camping fees. The State amid it would be difficult to eliminate the peck because of grants .�• :- ._.x` received. They suggested replacement. Mayor Wagoner asked for a copy of the grant, ate. Mc. McGillivray noted there are 3 grante. H-9 Library Commission A. :�� None PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD a. Mayor Wagoner. Regarding Old Town Committee. Therm t: has been interest by additional people. Most live and } own property there. He recommended additional members • ,-its ig�?_+:•t `*` > KathyTomcdle (Tom Tomcdle has resigned) }}. =.;.•,._ Alan Scream .,% :_ Jerry Foster �* Will Jahriq: r Dan Hakkinen o '., He would like •Native representative. He will ask _. t, George Miller for a suggestion. -` -` council agreed to the list. Mayor Wagoner asked for * q terms of office and will reappoint Bob Cowan as ter• chairman. -;'�. s�ti - _ �� ,. � -•far :Ti`r-' ,' v-:ir'tl�-•r.., �� - - G••e.> l� h.•�h _. � _ _ eat y43F ' - KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH S, 1986 Page 9 b. Publio Works Director Kornelie. The contract on the boat facility has gone to Alan Houtz and Leon Queenel for review. a. Public Works Director Kornelie. The packet for the HAS project to be discussed March 11 was distributed. d. Father Torgonsky, Russian Orthodox Church. He asked for support for the Russian Orthodox Church es a National landmark. 'He distributed material from the Dept. of Interior. e. Councilman Ackerly. He had the information for a wall calendar for review. He asked Administration to bring a proposal to Council. f. Councilman Ackerly. He requested a letter be sent to John Simeroth, KCHS, for hie appointment to the Air Force Academy. g. Councilman Ackerly. The Seattle Seahawke will be playing a basketball game with the Alaska legislators March 7. Proceeds will help KCHS with the Close-up program. h. Council was reminded to give the Comprehensive Plan reviews to Planning Specialist Loper by March 10. 1. Councilman Wlee. Regarding the report on dumping oil on the land fill. Council by motion directed Administration to file formal complaint to EPA. He would like a report. J. Councilman Wise. Where are we on the float plane schedule - land acquisition, pre-app filed, etc. Airport Manager Ernst said he would have written i .. t . r� M1[f report. ADJOURNMENT n Nesting adjourned at 9f20 PH. n`" 'pry �10 .•e� ) Janet Whelan City Clerk YY.L.t 7�-mow 1.401. . St- C NO KV.NAI CIENTRAT HIGH erutw 9563 Kenai Spur Hwy. - Kenai. Alaska 99811 Phone 28$.7624 February 219 1986 Mr. Bill Brighton Kenai City Manager 210 Fidelgo Street Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mr. Brighton, Pad D. Bpp um ftemw RkbW D. Hdtbas a ft" M - 0 1 MaNaie R. Ocom �ar�w►w+■+rwi AnMNndw.eia We appreciate the educational support from two of the City's employees, and want to make you aware of their service and our gratitude. Fire Chief Alfred Ivanoff made available the services of his department by allowing Fireman Walter Williamson to conduct C.P.R. classes for our physical education students.. Their time and expertise enabled approxi- mately two -hundred fifty (250) students to receive C.P.R. training. =" These two gentlemen merit your recognition, as well as ours. _ T_ Sincerely, Paui� rs onion Principal FM:w CC: Tom Wagoner, Mayor Tom Ackerly, Councilman Sally Bailie, Councilwoman Chris Dfonfor, Councilwoman John Wise, Councilman Jess L. Hall, Councilman Ray Measles, Councilman . �1N�m"i�a_ - ��a•.. t ��. � �:L'J:..c✓G�lJfJ. 1. .. .. Nil. -!!4P WILLONCFFICLO Gave""O" E 0 x F STATU or ALASKA CORK[ OF THC OOV9ANOR JUNNAU 21 February 26# 1986 7: The Honorable Tom Wagoner mayor of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 Dear lkq:r_� I enjoyed the opportunity I had to meet with you and the other mayors from across Alaska during the recent Alaska Conference of Mayors meeting in Juneau. Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to address my legislative priorities and issues of concern to your organization. As I mentioned during my presentation, there is a need for sound planning in state governments particularly given the declining oil prices worldwide. In previous years, we have been preparing for this by reducing the growth of state government. This year I have worked with members of my Administration to reduce the actual size of state govern- ment. Through our discussions during the meeting on February 7, you are aware that I have proposed additional measures to deal with our fiscal situation. Debt management is one of the measures I have proposed to the Legislature, to limit the growth of our debt and to protect our bond rating. I have also proposed the Budget Reserve Fund which is designed to protect the Permanent Fund and the local budget process. I hope you have had a chance to review the material I made available an my debt management package and the Budget Reserve Account. Please feel free to contact me if you have comments or questions an these proposals. I appreciated hearing the concerns of your organization regarding capital projects, particularly school construc- tion, as well as the bond income issue, economic develop- ment, and fire protection. These are certainly concerns I share and am working to address. *%L. I - . a V The Honorable Tom Wagoner -2- February 26, 1986 Thank you for advising me of your concerns regarding achcolt 06h*trActioW and for your comments on problems you have endntered on plan reviews by the State -'Fire -Marshall's; ac Qf'tice: I have advised the State Fire Marshall of your concerns and have asked that he get together with Sandra Borbridge of my staff. I will get back to you with further information on this issue. Once again, thank you for affording me the opportunity to share my ideas with you. I appreciate the feedback I received during the question -and -answer session, as well as the information you provided me regarding your concerns. I look forward to seeing you here in Juneau, or in your community should I have the opportunity to visit you there. Sincerely, Bill She field Governor cc& Sam Neal State Firs tarshall I X u^<,a Z: - ... __B Ei N `-7�8A7E DEPARTMENT UK NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER March 5, 1966 i 4 789 GTY CLfRk I• ... r/TYOFKE'At The Honorable Tom Wagoner6- Mayor, City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mayor Wagoner: I am pleased to appoint you to the Kenai River Special „ Management Area Advisory Board. As a member of this Board 9 ry you will be working with the public to ensure that a wide range of views are considered during the Kenai River W planning process and advising me about the development and implementation of the river plan. The next meeting of the Board is on March 134, 1986 at the Borough Building in Soldotna. Division of Parks and Outdoor - .. Recreation staff will provide you with materials for this = meeting. ; Sincerely, Esther C. Wunnicke - -'- Commissioner cc: Governor Sheffield -' Neil Johannsen =. COMMITTEES: oommittea on Community and Regional Affain Committee on Transponation Special Committee on Oil and Gas Special Committee on Flsherles Finance Subcommiuee on Fish and Game 10C Sta ka Altate legiolature h• suy � . ii . w. VIo1W111 Vol,, f� ' Seldovia Engllth Bay �illol Halibut CoNikol-evw Ninilchik Clem Gulch Andre Merrou Represeatadve March 7, 1986 h Mqq� tsf 1�a6 r.�ry �4 40 Mayor Tom Wagoner City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Tom: Congratulations on being named to the Kenai River Advisory Board by the Commissioner of Natural Resources. In my opinion, we have been needing a local elected official to serve on this board. I look forward to working with you. Let me know if I can be of service. AVM/lc Durlog Session: P. O. Box Y. lunau. Atoka "811. (Wn 46!•2719 Best regards, A.A.4— Andre Marrou Representative Dur ft Interim: Box 1573, Homer. Atoka "603. (11M 0401 F x -3 Suggested by: Mayor Wagoner CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO, 1120-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 20 BY ADDING CHAPTER 20.10 ENTITLED "ADVISORY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION" AND REPEALING KMC CHAPTER 11.10 ENTITLED "ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION" WHEREAS, it has been determined that there is a need for an Advisory Transportation Commission to plan and correlate the development of harbor, airport and roads in the City of Kenai; and, WHEREAS, the development of such an Advisory Transportation Commission would encompass the duties and responsibilities of the Advisory Harbor Commission as stated in KMC Chapter 11.10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following changes be made in the Kenai Muncipal Code. QSection 1 Title 20 of the Kenai Municipal Code be amended by the addition of Chapter 20.109 entitled Advisory Transportation Commission, and enacted in its entirety as attached hereto. Section 2 Chapter 11.10 of the Kenai Municipal Code, entitled Advisory Harbor Commission be repealed in its entirety. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this second day of April, 1986. ATTESTS 3anst Whelan, City Clerk TOM WAGONE99 MAYUR First Readings March 19, 1986 Second Reading: April 2, 1986 Effective Dates May 2, 1996 0 • �t h CHAPTER 20.10 ADVISORY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Sections 20.10.010 Creation 20.10.020 Duties and Powers 20.10.030 Terms of Commission Members 20.10.040 Qualifications 20,10,050 Proceedings of Commission 20.10.010 Creations There is hereby created a Kenai Advisory Transportation Commission, which shall consist of seven members who shell be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. A chairman and vice chairman of the Commission shall be selected annually and shall be elected from and by the appointive members. The Mayor and one Council member elected by the Council as ex-officio members of the Commission and as consultenta, may attend all meetings, but they shall have no vote. 20.10.020 Duties: (a) The Commission shall be required to establish polic es relating to transportation including# but not restricted to: seaport, airport and land facilities. (b) The Commission shall review and advise the City Council on the following areas of public interest and concerns (1) Kenai Municipal Airport (2) City Harbor facilities: including tidal and submerged lands (3) Roads and highways (4) Public vehicles: including taxicebe, buses and limousines (5) Navigable waters: including Kenai River (6) Integration of systems with the general and industrial development of the City (c) The Commission may appoint committees of local citizens to aid in its duties, including, but not limited to, investigations and reports relating to specific items. 20,10.030 Terms of Commission Members: The members shall serve for a term of three years or until a successor is appointed and qualified; provided that the terms of the initial Commission members shall be staggered so that three members will be appointed for one year, two members will be appointed for two years, and two members will be appointed for threo years. Terms shall commence on January 1 of each year. 20.10.040qualifications: A member of the Commission must be a resident OF e City Or enai and cannot be an officer or employee of the City of Kenai. If any member shall have three consecutive, un-excueed absences from regular meetings of the Commiseion; shall move hie residence from the corporate limits of the City of Kenai; is an officer or employee of the City of • _ :i ram' - • F• Kenei= or shall be elected or appointed as can officer or employee of the City of Kenei, then the service of such member shall terminate immediately. 20.10.050 Proceedings of Commission: The Commission shall establish rules of procedure, prov ed there shell be regularly scheduled monthly meetings of the Commission, which shall be open to the public. Permanent records of minutes shall be kept on the Commission proceedings and such minutes shall record the vote of each member upon every question. Every decision or finding shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and shall be a public record open to inspection by any person. All acts of the Transportation Commission are subject to the paramount authority of the Council. K aW-�:in'-�ht:cY-., :(.. r,.uei60�t1.:a ��i��•-r���%Y�,,.. . �w. rr Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 1122-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING KMC 12.30 ENTITLED "BURGLAR AND HOLD-UP ALARM SYSTEMS" BE REPEALED AND RE-ENACTED AND TITLED "ALARM SYSTEMS." L. WHEREAS, building alarm systems are valuable and effective crime prevention measures; and, �. WHEREAS, certain deficiencies exist in the present alarm ordinance, including but not limited to, a lack of incentive on =E the part of alarm owners to insure that false alarms are not .:.� generated; end,_j; ' R WHEREAS, the present alarm ordinance as delineated by KMC 12.30 `f is cumbersome; and, y, WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance better addresses the problems ` resulting from substantial increases in the number of alarms ® within the community; and, - WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance provides specific means of addressing an increasing number of false alarms; and, WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance alleviates the necessity of ro direct answering alarms by the Kenai Police Department; end, WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance provides for escalating fees charged for increasing numbers of false alarms from the same =} t source. = NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Kenai Municipal Code, Section 12.30, entitled "Burglar and Hold -Up Alarms" is rescinded and re-enected as follower 1 n a. -�y.. .a CHAPTER 12.30 ALARM SYSTEMS Sections: 12.30.010 Definitions 12.30.020 Prohibited Acts 12.30.030 Alarm Registration 12.30.040 False Alarm Charges 12.30.050 Existing Alarms 12.30.060 Penalties and Remedies 12.30.010 Definitions: (a) "Alarm" means any operable device except an official —municipal fire alarm, but including without limitation, automatic dialing devices which telephone a pre-recorded message or transmit a signal or message to the Kenai Police Department and devices that produce an audible or visible signal which is intended to alert the police or some other person that a criminal act or other emergency exists and requires assistance. Devices commonly known as "smoke alarms" intended primarily for residential use and designed to emit a signal upon the detection of smoke, fumes, or heat, shall not be considered alarms for purposes of this chapter. (b) "Chief of Police" means the chief of the Kenai Police Department or hie designee. (c) "False Alarm" means an alarm signal that the chief of police determines is caused by a reason other then condition which the alarm is designed or intended to detect or a natural phenomenon beyond the control of the owner. (d) "Owner" means a person who is responsible for the proper operation of an alarm under this chapter and who has registered with the Kenai Police Department pursuant to Section 12.30.030 of this chapter. 12.30.020 Prohibited Acts: (a) No person shall cause, permit, or allow a false alarm signal to be emitted from or alarm. (b) No person shall own, install, connect, operate, or possess an alarm except as provided in this chapter. (c) No person shall own, operate, connect, install, or possess an audible alarm unless that alarm automatically ceases to emit an audible sound after 15 minutes and dose not repeat the audible sound for a like period thereafter. (d) No person shall Install, connect, own, or possess an automatic direct dial alarm in ouch a fashion as to ring any telephone number at the Kenai Police Department. (e) No alarms, except for City operated eyeteme, will be Installed in the Kenai Police Department. 2 n 01 12.30.030 Alarm Re,��iet�ration: A person who owns or possessee an alarm shell register immediately certain information required by the Chief of Police with the Kenai Police Department including, without limitation, the identity of the owner, location of the alarm the name and telephone number of a responsible individual for that alarm. If the alarm is an -0 unmonitored audible alarm system, the name of two individuals authorized to enter premises, one of whom shall be available at all times, to correct any alarm malfunction, must also be Y provided. An owner is under a continuing obligation to keep the - i1 Information on his registration current by reporting any change d to the Kenai Police Department within ten (10) days from the date of change. - 12.30.040 False Alarm Charges: (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, he owner of an alarm shall pay a charge in accordance with this section for each and every false alarm to which the police respond, as follows: ; Except four false alarms at each identifiable separate location during a period of one (1) ° calendar year - No Charge "'`' The fifth (5th) false alarm through the Sixth (6th) false alarm - $ 50.00 = The seventh (7th) false alarm through the tenth (10th) false alarm - $100.00 = For each false alarm in excess of ten - $200.00 ' (b) The City shall bill the owner for false alerme, and the ` owner shall pay those charges in the manner provided by the City. If an owner fails to pay charges assessed pursuant to this section tt the City may seek payment by any lawful means. (c1 This section shall not apply to false alarms occurring within 30 days immediately following installation of that alarm. (d) This section shall not apply for a period of seven (7) days after receipt of written notice that an alarm system is T being upgraded, repaired, or receiving maintenance. Only one 4. such seven-day period will be granted in any calendar year. 12.30.050 Existing Alarms: Any person who presently owns, operates, or possesses any alarm within the City of Kenai which' does not conform to the requirements of this chapter, shall_ - disconnect that alarm and render it inoperable or alter it in - - accordance with this chapter no later then the effective date of this chapter. 12.30,060 Penalties and Remedies: (a) In addition to any other remedy or penalty provideFTy this chapter, or _ 0 available at law or in equity, a person who violates a provision _ of this chapter shell be Subject to a civil penalty of not more 3 .�iG'•Yw:..«,..;w'.1:.4'.ii/:�..lu4e51:c:.0 �v-•. . . ... .-l.a., ., _ .. —f 4 -Ytp a, W J than $19000.00 for each offense, or injunctive relief to restrain the person from continuing the violation or threat of the - violation, or both ouch civil penalty and injunctive relief. Upon application by the City for injunctive relief, and a finding that a person is violating or threatening to violate a provision of this chapter, the Superior Court shall grant injunctive relief to restrain the violation. (b) Each day during which a violation described in this section occurs shall constitute a separate offense. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 16th day of April, 1986. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk 3/13/86 TOM WAGONER, MAYOR First Readings March 19, 1986 Second Reeding: April 16, 1986 Effective Dates July 1, 1996 a �u• .t 14'd� -j' L • CITY 0 F. O. WX 440 flow. MMM M11 M NON@ to • I'M NENORANDUN TO: Mayor Wagoner and Kenai City Council FROM: Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECT: Vacation of Portion of Coral Street and Portion of 40' Utility Easement - Gusty S/0 04, Add 01 ° DATE: Narch 14, 1986 Action Requested: Vacation of a portion of Coral St. A portion of 40' utility easement existing within Gusty S/D Petitioner/Owner: City of Kenai �- Locations Lots currently leased by the Vat's Center, and Swenors. Lot 1-A not under lease. "Concession Current Use: Access into Lots" and �.. to Lot 6A Proposed Use: To relocate the ROM to create a safer intersection for Cohoe Ave 8 - -- Coral St. J _ Staff Recommendation: Statement of non -objection to Borough Planning Commission Reoo@imendetiont Statement of Non -objection Staff Comments: The vacation of the ROM and utility easement will allow for more efficient use of lot 69 Blk 1. Lots 1 d Z, Blk Z will be combined Into one lot (Wo The 00 will now partially align with the existing ROM's rather then create a large jog where Coral Street is intersected by Cohoe - Avenue. �� 0 E _ 1 PBNINBOLA CLARION KBNAI PBNINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC BEARING Public notice is'hereby given that the followingpetitions have - been received to vacate various utility easements and rights -of- r< '`-?. way. The areas under consideration are described as follows: 1. A. QUBfil: To vacate Robins Road, a portion of James - A ue and the west 17 feet of Bend Street within Robins a-_- Bob ision No. if Plat f79-189f (Proposed Kenai Timbers Subdi ion). Also to be vacated is the 10 foot utility Basemen southwest of Robins Road; 10 foot easement no] bwest James Avenue and the 5 foot utility easement west of Ben treet. Said subdivisio lies south of Dogbone Avenue and north of Parson Lake wi in Section 18 f Me Rllwf B.M. "-::.,;H"• Be pUDjQN2s To redesign ights-of-way to conform with :. existing location of to ways: C. BPPLIC8�1T8: John W. latt Anchorage Alaska f _ and O.. • . ,s. J.P. Robins Boulder City. ada 2. A. flUBBT: To vacate Ronda Avenue of Spacious Lot atk� ivision Plat l72-77 Section 24f T7Nf R12W. Said r ., roc y lies between Kelly Lane and Haggitt Lane. f ��Y_:•_ '.- Be pUBSQBB: Alternative access is available therefore Ronda Aven is not necessary. n . , ., C. 88tL1C8a1T8: D orate MaLaren f Gary Mellott and Harold , woo Nikis , Alaska an " Bud Vinson Kenai, Alas - .0 �s,.. 3. A. BEDUBBT= To vacate a portion of Coral Street and .. . - - portion of 40 foot utility easement within Gusty B T5Nf R11Wf City of Subdivision Addition 91, Section f Cohoe Kenai. Roadway lies between Renal Spur Highway and - ' •-= Avenue. - ,-0 Bej "OeBs To relocate the right-of-way to create a safer .> intersection for Cohoe Avenue and Coral Street. ' C. : City of Kenai BtPLICBBiT y . r` ' �? Renai f Alaska10 •S. . c;�:Y..c43.`Hr3..•i. «..• _a8'.J►iwYWdll(n'a vf >t e.. .... .. f . .. .. . . v � M ~•1i=i-+1'-:+-i.L:_:.. 'lts .yl• .- a. .. .. Opp .. •"h '. 3 Public hearing on these petitions will be held by the Renal Peninsula Borough Planning Commission at the scheduled meeting of March 24, 1986. The meeting, to be held in the Borough Administration Building in Soldotna, Alaska will start at 700 P.m. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning these petitions should do so at this public hearing or submit written statement to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department, P.O. Box 850, Soldotna, Alaska 99669. Pot additional information, please contact Jane Gabler, Resource Planning Department, 262-4441, or Zenith 4441. Kevin Penner Planning Department Publish 2X (March 10 and 17, 1986) 0 EO • c •• r • I PE!:MON ?0 VACATR Peas • 8100 non-refundable tee to help defray costs of advertising t l '\ public hearing. Plat tees are in addition to vacation tees. ti'" jJ(1 Public right -of -.way dedicated by uSTY Su6 Ava F0 •�To' (Z(j Utility easements granted by )) tiledFuvon in Mat #1 Recording u1scrIct 1_1 tasement for public road or ) as net out in right-of-way 1 recorded is 1_1 Easement for utilities > Recording District in Book Page r. 1_1 section line easement jA 9 copies of plat or map showing proposed vacation. It right -of -Way -� - --- • �i or easement were granted by document, submit copy of document. Has right-of-vay been full or partially constructed? (_1 yes or W no ii�wnoN •rmee Is utility easament being used by utility company? (_1 yes or 1_1 no VAeOWwo u._r It so. which utility company. Purpose of vacationer. Purp 1-9 -1 z gy G- r' /}r- G i ia.yFh•W- G/7a ., o �sv�a• G � iITJs �L � Lu,c.ti �. Z>< u c .�-sz• IC c. •v •.. ::. ten. L•rr��-+.� sz cra N sn :.� rZ -ta K'_+...� n Petition to be signed by owners of majority of the front feet of land -� fronting part of street$ section line saaament$ or easement sought to ,t be vacated. Each suet include mailing address and legal description of his property. Submitted by, Name —/,v / Z;,+, Tr �,�,�,,,,•YS - Address /�,�� T7:i�-c�, ivG a�� /'..� 5.�, l's 3 ua l4/WM BAWL Petitioners to Vacations Name __�rY rgly /Cv-wed, Name �4�,•� 'Sti •••\.� _ ''! • , L Address eZ�G Address Omar of Owner of _--.._1_---•�- .78 asp on PsaPe (cescraptialk ropesey , Name Name `..• . " • ,,1; - Address Address Owner of Owner of 1 ucr pt od ol property (escc p on 0-METRITM 41 o �p A 1• bi%.t t�i liM.'.R.1.: •..1.�,. v .... •w• •• • w vJ. N• .. y M 4worH yt i t:1 • 9 • . `yam\ a ; •� , . _•. .. �.. met qvlotft .. ,.4.,.h '•. f .� ' :# '; � .-. ..per `I� . ., IN s: + :;:t i • °'` ' $ PORTION OF 40 FOOT UTILITY BASEMENT o - .. «. ' : ��•� ,�; PORTION OFDCORAL ST...� A► . • , TO BE VACATED..067 �� �.1 WPWIAf OW iiN/MiftNAN•II�W � b. ....1r ;♦P • ,:3' � • , N�wf RO 000 mi 60600016 wMA • �'A s MMM10110 0p•ONI+,iKM/fA0 =. 4 t: l'. F ® Pr". 201t To VACM \ Fees 5100 non•sefundable fee to help defray coats of advertising public hearing. Plat !ass are in addition to vacation fees. public right-of•.way dedicated by lti"-'.r`r 6 V 0 I I ams o $ubaIvi�oT (Z(1 utility easements granted by ) filed in tylat Recording err ct u E (_1 Casement war public road or 1_1 Easement for utilities as set out in cumrnt recorded In Recording Distr otin�' Book Page (_I section line easement pq or easement were granted by doeumant. submit copy-ofidocument -of-way Nor tu..,✓ Has right-of-way been full or partially constructed? (_1 yes or �( no Au"CricN• 61.1.vep Is utility easement being used by utility company? (_1 yes or I�1 no VAC0#q& -) if so, which utility oompsny. purpose of vocations 5,( L7 m'V-u a r. i /* - Tc 21.0. ,-t A S.'o die_ �� /�'�S c r: n o •..i rL G-vims . 2.ut.rrs� . D . t�rn�•,.i n LvN Sn.,.� e- petition to be signed by owners of maJority of the front feet of land be vacated. Each must include mailing addrreess and legaalledescription of his property. Submitted by, Name k rb--2,n 'W rY e Address MAw• A44 6 A-e /'..rem G, Lv iy 44 ia-g— Petitioners to Vacations Name Z., ry U* AddressAk �G owner of c P on opF' i•?T Nabs Address ownev o9 (description opropere 4�\�•\�1i�1, Imo`` . ? Name Address t.. RIQ ZI:. t►• Owner of .. • ` Nam• Address owner of t •rc on Olt pr • M F CITY OF KE "loll eapal ato N"M IMat;,u U" o,s„ MEMORANDUM T0: Mayor and Citv Council FROM: Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECT: Application for Grant for Kenai Original Townsite Development DATE: March 14, 1986 The City of Kenai received the attached grant application recently. The application deadline was March 14th. While the Division of Parke and 0 Outdoor Recreation, the sponsor of the application appologi:ed for getting the package out late with no real preparation time, the deadline was firm. What the application does, is present the project to a Board from the National Historic Register office along with all other applications from around the state. The application with the attached resolution does MA commit the City of Kenai to anything at this point, merely to bring to the attention of the two offices the fact that the City of Kenai Is moving towards an identified goal. While the resolution went with the application package unsigned and unapproved, the Anchorage office stated that they would accept the draft in order to meet the deadline and the resolution can be approved, edited, whatever at a later date. The important thing is to get the application Into the review process. The next application date is May, M. This application will not ensure that Kenai will be chosen, we may have to reapply again in 1987 and beyond until we are chosen. N 91 . . Suggested byt Old Town Committee CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. % -a8 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANTS-IN-AID FOR THE KENAI ORIGINAL TOWNSITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Old Town Committee has recommended the pursuit of funding for commencing the development project for Old Town, and WHEREAS, an application package for a Historic Preservation Matching Grant Fund for Nominations to the National Historic Register has been submitted by the State of Alaska, Division of Parke 8 Outdoor Recreation to the City of Kenal.and which deadline for application is March 14. 1986, and WHEREAS, this body hoe reviewed the application for federal financial assistance for the above named project, and is fully cognizant of the obligations and responsibilities that will be incurred by accepting such assistance= and WHEREAS, by filing this application with the appropriate body the Old Town Development Project may become eligible for funds for the preliminary steps In achieving it's goals. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, approves the submission of sal.d application and approves Janet Loper as and Ron Keeprisin as agents of the City of Kenai for administration of this project. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of March, 1986. ATTESTt Janet an. City -Clerk 0 YON GOE, MAYOR WAR .. - .. ".iv3•. it • !t /- 71 HISTORIC PRESERVATION MATCHING GRANT FUND APPLICATION FT186 q Eligible Grant Projects*2 Survey Inventory Planning Nominations Certified Local Governments r Fill out and mail this portion to: r mailing address: -- State Historic Preservation Officer Alaska Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation P.O. Box 7001 Anchorage► Alaska 99510. " Bring to or deliver to**s 3601 "C" Street - Suits 1278% '. Anchorage, Alaska =-3-T * Restoration, rehabilitation and acquisition projects not eligible. _-__.-.-_ .�__ - ** If using an express delivery service other than the Post Office Express Mail service please use this address. •:mot' es•. APPlication. Page �tr ^t i!i.L.a . �: . A . •-Fis2t.n` r .+F+w�:',if2if?7.a.r1iL!i,' > :.. . fi:: v! i. -.. .. �_t :ems_ r " JJ'� l LETTER OF APPLICATION State Historic Preservation Officer 71 Alaska Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation P.O. Box 7001 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 This to an application for the following assistance for an historic preser- vation projects S 1. Project Name: Kenai Original ownaite Develooment 2. Locations vlrhln rho r4yx 1AMIPA 3. Property owner (if applicable): ; .lame: City of Kenai Mailing address: 210 Fidalao Kenai, AK 99611 Telephone number: 283-7933 4. Type of Project: ( X) Certified Local Government - - - (g ) architectural (building) Survey or Inventory ( ) Archaeological Survey or Inventory ( ) National Register nomination (g) Historic Preservation Planning 3. Project Budget Required a. Estimated Total Project Cost: SS14.970 b. Federal Share: c. Applicant's Share: $8.982 6. Source of Applicant's Share of Project: a. Cash $5,760 b. Donated nods and services P T.+ itanA R. SSnrv�naaWA�999 c. Loans Sincerely. William J. Brighton, City Manager e Applicants name - printed or typed Ap a auth sad signature a . F Applicants mailing address S� }} Applicant's mailing address ppi cants telep one number ` DATE SUBMITTED:yiA/gA DATE POSTMARKED: (to be completed by State) DATE RECEIVED: (to be completed by State) Applications page 2 "'Swami `,i"ii'i,iiTi+yrii�iiiiRMTss+.-i*`• . , ... .. .. .+:.Ail/i• - . _ . - .. ..... - - -- .. _ �. a—•--..-n,r.---- . - ... .aka. - EM PROJECT UPORMATtON/PLAN OF WORK 1. Project Descriptions that work will be done under this project? What is the aim, scope and significance of the project? What will be the product? (Include a discussion of the relationship of your proposal to past work, ongoing work* or future work). (National Register nomination grant projects should include information on why this property qualified for the National Register of Historic Places. Criteria for eligibility to the National Register may be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office.) Applications page 9 • • t PROJECT INFORMATION/PLAN OF WORK (con't) Z. List in order of priority the items in your project proposal which will be accomplished if you are granted only a portion of your requeett f .. r IY• t" . w: r f F' Application. page 4 U .e�asw.:�r �.�— ao��r��is�� un w � .. . �<<. -� �s � - .. it .. C PROJECT INFORMATION/PLAN OF WORK (con't) S. Where will the work take place? 6. Other information you feel is relevant to evaluation of this projects PROJECT INFORMATION/PLAN OF WORD (con't) Tentative Budget In the following space enter the proposed budget for your project. SOURCES OF FUNDS BUDGET CATEGORY Fed Share Applicants Share Totals Personal Services • Travel/Per Diem Contractual Services Commodities Totals TOTAL DIRECT COSTS *102 STATE SURCHARGE TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Vi - aZ- a-d�5az i .3 a PROJECT INFORMATION/PLAN OF WORK (Con't) Proposed Source of Funds: STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE APPLICANT Tat least SOZ of the total project) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MATCHING GRANT FUND CASH EXPENDITURES IN-KIND/DONATED GOODS AND SERVICES TOTAL FEDERAL SHARE APPLICANT'S (grant request) TOTAL SHARE Application. pa8e 8 y, b LV pHoTomWR ANNOTATIONS Photca b Pl Now of Projects Locationas WOName o hotographert View (*.so north, south, left sides etc.): ph�aph OZ Name of Projects .Locations: Date/Name of Photographer: View (e.g. north, south, left aide, etc.)s Photograph 03 Name of Projects Locations: Date/Name of Photographer: Vidw (a.g* north, south, lefe side, ete.): Photo rah P4 VMS of Projects Locations:_ Date/Name of Photographer: View (e.go north, south, let aide, etc.): Photograph #5 Name of Projects Locations: Date/Name o otograp er: View (e.g. north, south, left side, etc.): Phot�o rapph #6 Nam�Project: Locationst Date/Name of P otographert View (e.g. north, south, le t side, etc.)t r „ 1 - 4 A t..- , • e! I Ph�faPr je ame o Project: - --- ------ ------ -'-- - -- --- Locationst Date/Name of P otograp ert View (e.g. north, south, left side, etc*): C Application@ pals 9 _ i:11 . la, ' i f r4. - -- STATEMENT OF WILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS .... OF FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAM '-- ''�' 1. I understand that this is an application for federal matching assistance for up to 401 of the total cost of the project which is the subject of this application. - ;--•••_�, 2. In submitting this application, i understand that if awarded the funds it -.. ,• f_°' - is my responsibility to comply with all program requirements which are ;. stated in the "Historic Preservation Fund Grants Management Manual." and 0., in other pertinent State and Federal regulations, and in the grant award :';.... agreements. 3. In submitting this application, I understand that project records are subject to audit after project completion, and that if such an audit "L questions expenditures for which I have been partially reimbursed I will return an amount equal to 402 of the questioned expenditures. 4. I understand that no grant or promise of a grant exists until the State V'iy� Historic Preservation Officer signs the State -Recipient Grant Agreement • r- even if the Historic Sites Advisory Committee recommends or allocates ' funds for my project, and that any funds expended before the grant period or before obtaining the SHPO's signature may not be reimbursed without v specific approval. The SHPO will not sin until all required materials and documents are in hand. )A 2LONOTARY SEAT. n re of licant Subscribed and sworn before me ;= this 14th day of March, 1986 • tit-J_•- _ wY LL'' M Commission Expires, F ? '* #*~_ 'max• - '- Application, page 10 j.'r.:�19:e::awtr'4�:idEG96�S1iUs�J-vra-r_....• ,.,u._•..'ivlidfi�li��.,•jr.:, ... - .. .l. // a) hIw tan a�wla.n.IIR I M" wa) 0.11. ilpAl IR OF in iMMa AswU= OF CDWIIAW juts rt. salt film AU of 1%41 city of Kenai (beninaker called "Applieant•Recipiens") IN=@ of ApokobRwipuaal HEREBY AGREES THAT IT will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 884$2) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Department of the Interior Regulation (43 CFR 17) issued pursuant to that tide, to the end the% in accordance with Tide VI of that An and the Repletion. no per. son in the United Stern shah. on the ground of nc% color. or national origin be excluded from participa• Non in. be denied the bonsfia of. or be otbertvise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the Applicant•Ittcipient receives financial assistance from and swam at 011" Hanby Gives Assurance That It will immediately take any measures to effectuate this agreement. If any red property or struc.cure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal finsocid assistance extended to the Applicant -Recipient by . memo of am" This assurance obligates t�e Applicant -Recipient. or in the case of any tansfae of such property. any wonsfinw for the period during which the real property or struceute is used for a purpose involving the provision of similar services or beat• 6ts. U any personal property is so provided. ibis assurance obligates the Applicast•Recipieat for this pedal during which it rains ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, ibis assurance obligates the Applieast•Racipieat for the period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it bye swam at OMM THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loons. contracts. properdy discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended alter the date beraof to the Applicant -Recipient by the bureau or office. including installment payments taker such date on account of arrangements for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date. The Applieant•Reciplent recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in rliaace on the reprasenadons and agreements made in this assurance, and that the United States shall reserve the right to seek judicial en(orcement of this assurance. This assurance is binding on the Applicant•Recipien4 is successors, traw fortes. and assignees, and the person or persons whose signature appear below are authorized to ails this assurance on behalf of the Applieane•Recipint. AMMAMM90MIDWSAoOnl1/ i City of Kenai• AW14CAM'•IMPI1N1 I Molls �, F CHECKLIST Complete, sign and submit this form with your application: All applicants* have you: provided the information requested on each of the pages of the application forms. _ attached a verification of non-federal matching funds for participant's share of project. For government -sponsored projects, the governing body endorsement required is sufficient when signed by an authorized officer of the government. (See examples of documents in application Information packet.) attached assurance of Compliance with Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964. attached statement of Willingness to Comply with Requirements of -- Federal Grant Program. attached maps -showing location of project. attached photographs showing overall character of property. (This is required of building/structures survey or inventory projects and National Register nomination grant projects only). Local Governments only, have you: l,1 attached a local government endorsement document. been certified under the Certified Local Government Program. �.i�irltlw. _.ac,» ...a:.•rdi)i....r.. .... r Applications page 12 _ Attachment 1 - APPENDIX A EXTRACT from 36 CFR 61 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF CONSULTANTS: The following definitions have been developed to help states locate and hire qualified professionals in the disciplines of history, archaeology, architectural history, and historical architecture. It should be noted that one year full-time professional experience need not consist of a continuous year of full-time work, but may be made-up of discontinuous periods of full im -t • or part-time work that total the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. A. HISTORY The m!nm!nimum professional qualifications are a graduate degree in history = or A closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or a closely related field and one of the following: (1) at least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, teachings interpretation, or.: 'other demonstrable professional activity with an academic institutions historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional Z .. institution; or (2) substantial contribution through research and _ publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of history. B. ARCHAEOLOGY eT inimum professional qualifications are a graduate degree in F archaeology, anthropology, or closely related field plus (1) at least one year of full-time professional experience or equivalent specialized training in archaeological research, administration or management; (2) at least four months of supervised field and analytic experience in general North American archaeology; and (3) demonstrated ability to carry research to completion. Iu addition to these minimum qualifications, a professional in prehistoric archaeology shall have at least one year ; full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study or " archaeological resources of the prehistoric period. A professional in historic archaeology shall have at least one year of full-time `... professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archaeological resources of the historic period. C. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY • minimum professional qualifications are a graduate degree in �•t.= architectural history, art history, historic preservation, or a closely -- related field, with course work in American architectural bletory; or a bachelor's degree in architectural bistorys art history, historic c, preservations or a closely related field plus one of the following: (1) at least two years of full-time experience in research, writing or - -n teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture - with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, museum or other professional institution; or (2) substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of American architectural history. Application. page 13 i�Wl1"i�6�RIt'��{r ..� lCi ... �.-,.J#}'JJ_15�Y..R":viG.•.. _. 1,. .. .. -. -. ••'. ..l L D. HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURE �L The minimum professional qualifications are a professional degree in architecture or a State license to practice architecture, plus one of the followings (1) at least one year of graduate study in architectural preservation. American architectural history, preservation planning or a closely related field and at least one year of full-time professional experience on preservation and restoration projects; or (2) at least two years of full-time professional experience on preservation and • restoration projects. Experience on preservation and restoration projects shall include detailed investigation of historic structuress preparation of historic structures research reports, and preparation of plans and specifications for preservation projects. N Application. page 14 n SAMPLE OF VERIFICATION OF NON-FEDERAL MATCHING SHARE ALTERNATIVES r 1. I. the undersigned, hereby certify and verify that non-federal matching �r^ funds for the project which is the subject of the application are avail- • able. By this document. I authorise the repository of these funds to . certify their existence to the State of Alaska or its authorised agent. NOTARY SEAL .s signature of applicant) _ Z. to the undersigned, hereby certify and verify my intent to obtain the non-federal funds for the project which is the subject of this appli- cation by the following means: " y-j A copy of my application for these funds is attached. By this document. I authorise the potential lendor/grantor of these funds to communicate ` the results of my application to the State of Alaska or its authorized _ agent. .� NOTARY SEAL -(21groaurs pplicant) , Subscribed and Sworn to before me on the 14th da y - of March, 1986. •:'_ Commission Expires Itle /A-Y� - ' <rf 15 '}• ..... ,li.:fift.vi+a: a _♦. y+a � ...;r - < .. � r� . . c3.. - .. .,G : .... .. _ _ .k=4r . __. .. _ -. `. - .. - VV. ♦ .Q i F N-/ CITY OF KENAI " Od Goa#W o1 4"** e10FIO M MN. ALASCA 9MI TQLpmem-ms 1J March 189 1966 TO: Council vL .r FROM: Janet Whelan1'jtA� City Clerk RE: Teleconference ; Legislative Affairs Agency contacted me this date to notify me of ".. a teleconference to be held on Thursday, March 209 1986 at ,. 3:00 PM in the teleconference offices. -1 Subject: Community Right to Know - Hazardous Chemicals Being Used, Stored and Produced in the Community and Potential Dangers For further information, call 262-9364. jM :dam q_ a. • iG '�IIw��i.�l��liltll�+tA71h::.(J;i : r.: r..•S z:.:=•iaN•lr L.-..... tt:�l ..-u- u.•_. .. ... ..-.r•....rc_:.::: .. t_s. ;. _ ., ql• 9 r4; i q r { U l� 1 Fundementelly wrong Last month. we took credit for calling the market top In early January, and then stuck our foot in our mouth by clalminp that rates probablj had to consolidate for a while. our fundamental analysis was sound —we saw reasonable economic growth and a bond market that has come a long way in the past 12 months. However, we were dead wrong In our orudent caution as long -bond —bond investors anddam ere made 8 killing in the March market As it turns out, only the techni- c ans were atire to come out ahead. and we respectfully admit missing the disinflation thome that dominated last month's bond ma!kdlt rally. —Ther-ed has pumped out a lot of money, as our reserve bank credit and free reserves statistics show. The big question for now is whether all this monetary and fiscal stimulus will reignite the general economy. Right now, bond tradere believe that It won't. We think that it could, and that the "Roaring 80's" may lie ahead. We'll come back to that theme next month. Some Investors expect the Fed to cut the discount rate from 7% percent to 7 or even 6% percent. With leading Indicators down In January and foreign central banks expected to cut their rates, a discount rate out now looks inevitable. One-year CDs could be a good way to lock in Aeld. Pliblie I11T4X%S10ri�,,�6 editor....................................alrardMlller Production Editors ...... Rebecca Russum, Kenn Slegert lbecutiveolrodar ...................... Jeffrey Lilseer The Publlo Investor Is published monthly by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA, formerly ihd Municipal Finance Officers Association), 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800. Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312/977-9700). Annual subscription rates are $50 for active GFOA members, $65 for associate GFOA members and $80 for nonmembers. The Information and opinkrne printed herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but GFOA makes no guar- antee of accuracy. Opinions, forecasts and recommendations are offered by Individuals and do not represent official GFOA poticy positions. Nothing herein should be construed as it sperdNc reoormmendatlon to buy or sell a flnencial escurity. ✓J�1Y�f.i_\. ' �u�YA+,.YF•VI) it:>•--•. • • _'•... Databank W_ Mal GNP Growth A'-' 1.,�:'.74 N a'" ";NI 0'8a ° Apn�nWM M11116.tiu173 dollars �-. Mensy wp�I growth i.,. `t Li t � M�i. tl� MOs• , M1, annual ohattge z `:►9.8� +11.796 P prica ddlsto► : +, :. •.111y.G'Oa 1e► AGo • ; Annual rate +,«Gh.. •. ii i�.1.: `T7.�� +9.7�6 'tj inde Finiahed►goods. annual rats '. •~ k8avaj.816 lndoWl$l production Indio • . i Jan. lit Mos.. s } FederalRaw" Board J'" §00.9% •'•'c,'+U% ^ Ni Mftn „i Lmliimonth clfr�arrg Indext . • r ! , D' Nov : i '•g%eTFO. -Total smptoyment :;�ti`i��`�': ; y� n. A" i Minions of workers 401 S 10.1f :>I<:%`-1080 nemploymem� yrate"Jan. ^ •%p a r/AAgge redo ryledolla era Constant 13'3 t.3ti rrterolal & Industrial tans FOIL rear Ago I only billions. bank Motor on� xlai�t'>:68 ►'�? dl69 rr, b Free bank reserves r µWb.13,!�46 1"9 Federal reserve; i millions.. 1 , h W Federal reserve bank orWit b. 29 • r Ago , s among ••;*:oyr��w,+. • �19as ••��heoa ,,.h: Many market fund matu -VAFeb. 20 ' '. days 1 ras 29 di a o Jl.'_ �t Thousands of units 1-1'rW%WMWR0BB PA'A4W • Instrument c: T-bill discourt� . .'Tl3 nk ll CD - eld , bond (Cr "13VrIsiFffMOlm . .-Japanese yen (a/11). • t;analdlan dollar •: ti • Cis: One fnon ' fir• .6� r {� CDs: One year Bft One T-biil:91-day T-b10:112-w, �(eNl . , . , • ,1 `Send ByYe1`'90bond'` . - '.i?ttltaitklfolll f i L L t �l l CITY OF . 1. „ Od eapdal o� �4�•• NOROAkWO WU1,ALMU UU MONBM•H11d t March 13, 1966 dbeil ;, E Honorable Ted Stevens ¢ United States Senate 522 Hart Building _44 Washington, DA. 20510 y o - Dear senator Stevens: I understand that the Senate is considering H.R. 3636. I would like to state my objections to certain provisions of the bill that relate to municipal bonds. f The proposed legislation is so complicated and vast, that I will not pretend to understand it all, and accordingly, will keep my comments brief. 30-da Rule The bill that at least 5X of net bond proceeds must be expended within 30 days after the bonds are issued. in most cases, this is not possible. Public procedures often require requests for proposals or bidding processes - .. that delay actual expenditure beyond 30 days. 3-year Rule fact " Thebill provides that all bond proceeds must be spent within 3 years. The ie, some public projects do take longer than 3 years to build. The result of 4. this may be several smaller issues during the life of the project, rather thaw one issue, increasing insurance costs. y g=lexitZ of Arbitrage Calculation and Rebate The definition of what might constitute an ar itrage bond, or one that might be Al "treated" as an arbitrage bond, is unduly complicated. The annual computations required under Sec. 147 (e) (2) are very complex. The rebate provision seems - unfair in that all interest earned is paid to the Federal government. If a rebate provision To passed, it would seem that only the difference -in arbitrage interest should be rebated. Costs v_ II amp m very concerned about the costs, to the Federal government and local ' governments, to implement and administer these rules. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and I hope you will consider these -- :-= --=- -;---=---.o.` thoughts in your deliberations. sincerely, Charles A. Brown Finance Director ` p " -• :: CAB/v;j ��.�' '�((y,'�„-J�.•:::..it:Ci.Yir�'$S,Ci�li{1:•�=(•Yc•..:.Y. -.. • IvJJ �i U_«a:2�Lz_s._ .... - ° ). r ,. 3c N F CITY OF 210 ROALOO KENA1, ALASKA 9MI TEMMONS283-TSM March 13, 1986 Honorable Mike Navarre Representative, State of Alaska Pouch V (Mail Stop 3100) Juneau, Alaska 99811 Dear Representative Navarre: i understand that the H.B. 521 is currently in the House Community and Regional Affairs Committee. This bill would limit municipal G.O. debt to 7% of the average full value of taxable property of the municipality for the last two years. Further, for purposes of determining the G.O. debt for a city within a borough, the overlapping debt from the borough is included. Net debt is allowed in the computation in both cases. The figures below are estimates, taken from the City of Kenai financial statements and budgets, and updated through discussions with the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Name of Net Debt Governmental Unit Outstanding City y of Kenai, Alaska or 2,800,000 Kenai Peninsula Borough 180,000,000 Central Hospital Service Area 15,000,000 Total Direct and Overlapping Debt City of Kenai Assessed Value, 1986 City of Kenai Assessed Value, 1985 Average Assessed Value Maximum Debt Allowance Percentage Applicable to City of Kenai 100�.00% 8.80% 11.272 City of Kenai Ia Share of Debt $ 2r 0 000 15,840,000 11690,300 $ 313,500,000 266,378 000 579,8 t 2 2 99, 939,0 0 x 72 0 Page 2 Therefore, under the provisions of the bill, the City of Kenai will have already surpassed its maximum allowable debt and will be prohibited from issuing new debt. The ironic part of this is that this situation was caused by Borough debt, not City debt. City net debt is less than lX of our averaged assessed . value. However, because the Borough has a much larger tax base then the City, its debt limit under the bill would not be reached. The result is that Borough debt is more of a burden on the City of Kenai than it is on the Borough as a whole. Speaking for myself, and not necessarily for the City of Kenai, i am not opposed to reasonable debt limitations. However, i ask that overlapping debt be excluded from the calculation. 07 W] M KENAI PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION February 26, 1986 - 7s00 p.m. Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Present: Lewis, Bryson, Osborne, Smalley, Zubeek Absents Carignan, Oleson, both excused 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda approved as submitted 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS e. Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfills Permit Renewal &-Expansion Chairman Lewis asked for a representative from the Borough to present their materiel. Tom Boedeker, Borough Attorney came forward. Mr. Boedeker stated that this is a renewal application through the DEC. Landfill sites which are permitted through ADEC are subject to approval by the local body having zoning authority. Essentially, this Is a continuation of an on -going system. The nature of a landfill Is th t 11 thi i t i the ddit- n.� e you open new ee a, s e no an expans an, re are a tonal cells opening up, but this is two new cells to continue the some r operation because the old ones nave been filled. The entire site is under permit, not adding new areas, simply to seek renewal of the permit. We are simply making you aware that we will be opening two now cells. The two new cells does not require your approval. There are some concerns with the City that this is an expansion of a nonconform- ing use, however, opening the cells could be connected with that but I don't think that is necessarily connected with permit renewal, though y I suspect you would want to look at that matter. From our standpoint we are not expanding any use, we are continuing the some operation on -- :-_ the originally permitted site. Mr. Nowland Bombard came forward and gave a brief narrative of = operations of the landfill. We do not propose to go in an devastate the entire area with one felled swoop. We progress through an orderly _ management of the land starting with the clearing and grubbing operation of approximately 6 acres. This prepares enough area for - approximately 6 to 10 trenches to be excavated. Tzenehea are excavated approximately 1 to 2 trenches ahead of the filling operation. The material has been stockpiled on the site and is held in accordance !! r i - f :.. :,- Ot t .. 4 M1�-' � 31r--'6rr'i• f - N C u PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1986 Page 2 with COT material land use permit. DOT has not made itself available of the material, but we are holding it in the event that DOT needs it. Public as well as contractors are allowed to dump at the bulkheads. Once or twice daily, contractors consolidate the refuse, compacts it, and covers it. The areas of the roads are fenced to help eliminate the wind blown litter. Lighting systems are put in as roads are developed. We grade and seed as trenches are filled and brought to final elevation. We have used this system for the past 7 years and it has proved efficient. Chairman Lewis asked how many years these 2 new cells will serve. Mr. Bombard stated that one would be excavated within the next 2 months, one is already excavated. I have projected those 2 cells will last until mid -July. It is hard to pinpoint, it depends upon the season. Chairman Lewis opened the meeting to the public. Tom Wagoner, Mayor and resident of the City. I would like to bring to your attention, the summary received from Administration which begins in 1973 to the present time. The Borough has had from 1973 to look for additional sites for solid waste disposal of the same type they are currently operating at the old DOT sandpit site. When I first came to Kenai in 1969, it was a small unit, they extracted the send for a portion of the North Road and the new reconstruction. At the time the City voted to turn over the powers, I feel it was the Intention of the people of the City that they would see a discontinu- ation of this site as a solid waste disposal and that has not happened. The Borough has been spending a tremendous amount of money studying sites to no success and I cannot understand why it would take approximately 12 to 13 years to come up with a satisfactory solution. We knew there was a problem there since day one. The other thing I cannot justify, in front of any group, and you can call me an environ- mentaliet, a greenie, or anything else, but why would you take some of the most prime property in the City or in the Borough and allow the Borough to operate and expand a landfill and destroy prime residential property and that is exactly what they are doing. It is unfit for anything except perhaps some forme of recreation. It is sold there can be no construction take place on landfill, that is not exactly i true, you can construct anything on that site, it depends upon how much you want to pay to ensure the integrity of your construction. The City hoe just sold off their portion of Section 36 received as a Municipal Entitlement several years ago from the State and I think in good faith to the people that purchased that property, I feel they never expected to see the City to allow the continuation of a landfill for that many more years, let alone the expansion of that landfill, because they paid a good dollar value and they plan, in the -future to develop one of the finer residential developments in the Kenai Peninsula. Own Forest Drive, very close to thin Site to a brand now i la] X LA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1986 Page 3 tr3� subdivision just completed this year, all underground utilities, paved { streets, 3 or 4 hones are built. That area is potentially the site of more oubdivisionss not of farm home quality, but of upgraded hones in the $100 to $200,000 bracket. I have talked to the Borough Mayor, and as a member of the Council I would have no problem in giving an %.• o extension of time to operate that facility for one year, if at the end of that one year I knew the Borough was going to have a solution that = was palatable to all people concerned, including not only the City of Kenai, but residents of Nikiski, K-Beach, and other areas, because I think if a study were done, Kenai has become a depository for just about 60% of the solid waste of the immediate area or more. I guarantee that the material that goes in there is not just from the City residents. Mr. Bombard agreed. Mayor Wagoner stated, I am not In favor of this permit renewal, I would like to speak with the ;. Borough Mayor again and get some committment in writing that this is the maximum we are going to expand this site and also, that at a specific date, to be agreed upon, that property will be vacated, brought up to certain specifications, and either Bold, or restricted to no more landfill. I think what's going on with that piece of property is totally unacceptable. Royce Roberts, Kenai. I am partners with the City an Section 36 and this concerns me deeply and I am sure it concerns future buyers. My main concern in 26 years in Kenai, I've seen the dump moved from the south of town to the north of town and that's about the biggest accomplishment I've seen. I'm against lengthening it from the time they said they would cease, and when I bought that property, I was under the impression it would cease. Time would not help. Mr. Dick Mueller, resident of Kenai and Broker for Mueller Realty. I am here to speak against the continuation of the landfill in the present location in Kenai. I also have clients that have bought into the Section 36, one of these wanted to be here tonight but is having back surgery. The landfill hoe become a great disservice to that area `� of town. There are times that, even though they fill on a regular basis, there are odors, trash scattered in the area, and property values, particularly -in Nommsen S/0 have deteriorated quite badly in the last few years. I feel that some of this is due to the landfill being in the close proximity. I have another client that is marketing _ a property in the general area, hoping to make a first close u subdivision, and certainly the landfill is not going to help. I fees1._--- the Borough has spent a lot of money and done a lot of studies on fill sites and I find it hard to believe that they cannot identify a site A out of that area. - Chris Monfort 1509 Toyon May, Kenai# and Council member. I want to protest this move by the Borough, I oleo want to state that I have a _ problem, it states on the applications d49 will the following waste be _ -_.__ accepted - waste oil and oil spill cleanup waste, and they have marked I PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1966 Page 4 . "no", I do not feel that the Borough has quality control over what goes into the dump. We have had it brought to our (Council) attention in the past that waste oil has been dumped. Unless someone goes through an individual's garbage, there is no way of knowing what you are dumping. If the dump is allowed to continue, it will be there in the future and we are just finding out now, especially looking at the East Coast, what has happened to the iand and to the people from dumps that have had seepage into residential areas causing illness and worse. Councilman Wise asked if Mrs. Monfor was referring to the August 1985 moving of oil from.... answer from Mrs. Monfor, yes, on August 25, 1985, Mr. Dave Brown came before Council showing examples of what had been moved into the dump in the dead of night, we had asked Adminis- tration to write to the Borough and get some sort of answer and as for as I can recall, we have never had a satisfactory answer. The attitude is that as long as it is in the City of Kenai, they do not have to deal with it, we can do as we please because we are the Borough. This is the people of Kenai we are talking about. Anybody can come and dump in that location, they can come in the middle of the night, there is no control. David Brown, 119 Wooded Glen Court, Kenai. I am here on behalf of Dena' Ina Point Associates which are landowners of Tract A. It is approximately 18 acres, adjacent to and across the highway from the landfill. We would like to be on record as opposing any extension for this permit, agreeing with everything that Mayor Wagoner has stated with one exception, giving them one year extension. I think that the remainder of this year is more than enough time for them to locate an acceptable dump site. I think that the residential areas within the City are going north with the possible development in Section 36 and also along Redoubt Drive. Chairman Lewis asked Mr. Baedeker to "expound on efforts to search for an alternate location". Mr. Bombard explained that -the Waste Disposal Commission is focusing its search on a location for an incinerator site, whether the incinerator site would have an ash site attechad to it is a question mark. They have just begun that as a main topic. They are finishing a special waste site study which will have some Impact, to what extend we do not know. Some of the aspects of a special waste site, i.e. soil types and location are applicable, however, there are other aspects which are detrimental, that being distance. In an industrial situation, you are looking at industry hauling to the site with a landfill or ash site attached to the incinerator, you are looking at some residents hauling their waste to the incinerator so the distance question become more of a concern than with the special waste site. That hoc yet to be addressed by the MW Commission. In 1980 the Borough did a Solid Waste Management Plan and as one email task in the Plan was a site identification for landfilling. We looked at sites within a mile of any of the road ut K 0 r - . PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1986 Page 5 systems within the entire Peninsula. The search was done by arial and soils records. North of the Kenai River there were no site identified for landfill due mainly to the wetlands. The areas of the soils types that are desirable are not in close proximity to the road or are already developed. By going to the incinerator we can consolidate the waste flow, reduce it, and then if there is no ash fill on site there is less volume to haul. Even if a site were chosen, it would take a minimum of Y years, before we could put it on line, 3 years for an Incinerator. Commissioner Smalley stated, the Borough has been actively searching for a site for 12 to 13 years and has cane up with nothing. Mr. Bombard answered, we have been diligently searching for the last 6 years. Councilman Wise asked, when you were searching for the Incinerator, where was the dump for the ash you were planning on using. Mr. Bombard answered they were looking into several scenarios, depending upon the actual location of the incinerator. In the short term we were looking at the Soldotna landfill for the ash supposing we could not find a site where the incinerator could not accommodate an ash fill. Councilman Wise stated that he was under the impression that he had made statements before other bodies that you always th K i dum I believe you have been intended to bring the ash to a ens p, quoted in the newspaper. Mr. Bombard felt it would not be found in . . ... the newspapers. Councilman Wise asked how long the Borough has known intent the City of Kenai to oppose continuation of this ` a of the of permit. Mr. Baedeker answered that there has been no legal action by the City that is effective to bar this if that is what you are Councilman Wise answered that he is talking about intent. I - implying. am trying to establish for the record how long you have known......Mr. a... Baedeker interrupted saying, since when did you notify us, I would ask you a question....Councilman Wise went on to state, we were concerned the most recent permit expiring this December and how long you about have known of our concern over the dump. Mr. Baedeker answered, I so aware that you and members of the Council have had concerns for a number of years and objections. That's all I can say. I think most of the public is aware of that. That doesn't particularly alter the _ fact that the site is there and there is no other site at the present I'm how that is material to this decision. Councilman time. not sure Mies stated that he did not want to get into a debate. Mr. Sosdeker =- - stated he would respond in this way, the issue here is a permit have criteria you are going to have to determine -9`- renewal, you certain whether we violate something or there is some basis for this, there „ -are no legal bar@ to renewing a permit whether you consider this a can into all aorta of issues of nonconforming use or not, and we go paramount public use, but I think that's immaterial, what we're dealing with here is for some reason not to renew this permit, end ,.: you're authority is for as ADAC looks at it is in your zoning capacity. It's not we don't like it, you have to look at it as a zoning body and that's where you are exercising your authority. They i K . °... >y 1401 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1986 Page 6 are looking for zoning authority not do we have 42 people that don't want it. If those people object to that permit application the anyrimpedimeiate nts,I'mlace rnoteir aware ofnts whatobe is to the the issue would be.if itnis.see Chairman Lewis asked, if the permit were extended for one year, what would that do for you. Answer by Mr. Boedeker, it would give us a year. Chairman Lewis stated, we would be in the same spot next year. Mr. Boedeker answered I suspect you would have to look at a further extension. Chairman Lewis stated you have had several years and nothing has transpired. Mr. Boedeker answered that is true and there have been proposals and we have the same problem with any proposal that you have here tonight, everybody lives around it, everybody thinks we need a landfill but not in their backyard and that is the reality of selecting a site. There are costs involved, it would cost $550,000 a year to haul to the Soldotne landfill. You're own sewage treatment plant would have to haul to Soldotne which will overfill Soldotna's landfill. Mayor Wagoner stated he wished to reinforce what he said earlier, I think the specific time could be nailed down to when some of the Borough employees were directed to pursue alternate sites, that is when Mr. Rice went to work for the Borough. I would ask that you take no action on this permit tonight. There has been discussion on what is and is not the legality of the situation, I think you should have the opinion of the City's legal council who is out of town. The current zoning in that area is suburban residential and to permit a landfill in a residentially zoned area is hard for me to fathom. I would also like to get a comment on the record, this is my last year as Mayor and I hope people listen to this, there has been a lot of discussion from time to time about consolidation of powers on a Borough wide or service district wide basis. Looking back on this I'm not sure the City made a wise choice at the time of turning over the solid waste authority to the Borough because the City of Kenai did not go to the Borough and request they take over waste disposal. The reason the Borough consolidated on a Borough -side basis and the vote was held was because there were places in the Borough that were not organised and were having horrendous problems concerning waste disposal. Commissioner Smalley referred to the Zoning Code, 14.20.050 which deals with nonconforming use and quoted the section regarding enlarging or increasing an existing nonconforming use and stated the City would benefit from the City Attorney's opinion. Chairman Lewis stated that the Commission would not take action on the question this evening, but would recess and reconvene at the next meeting, 3/12/66. ran C PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1966 Page 7 Councilman Wise stated that he wanted all documents be formally Introduced into evidence as exhibits. Councilmen Wiee stated that he wished to have the chairman of the Solid Waste Commission at the next meeting. Chairman Lewis requested Mr. Mike Lucky of DEC attend the next meeting. MOTIONS Commissioner Bryson moved to recess the issue until the next meeting, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTES Motion passed unanimously Commission recessed for 10 minutes 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 12, 1986 Planning Specialist Loper explained some of the confusion during the Sheeran hearings and referred to the memo attached. Commissioner Bryson asked that in place of "day care centers" "home occupations" be added. This would preserve what was said by Mr. Hackney and confir what he intended. Also, on page 5, strike the sentence referring to the Jesse returning to the Commission. Minutes were approved as corrected. 6. OLD BUSINESS None 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Yearly Review of Gravel Pit Operations Foster Brothers Planning Specialist Loper reported that•etaff have reviewed the operations and recommend approval of the report. Commissioner Bryson asked if there were other pits operating that were beyond their reporting time, answer no. The next review period for a pit would be in April. NOTIONS ppitmoperationsrfornFoster Construction, seconded byvCommi sioneeravel iubeck ® VOTES Motion passed unanimously .. Y:. • V�:tl:"ll c 2! i t PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES .. a February 26, 1986 - . 4._ '•r Page 6 8. PLANNING Planning Specialist Loper asked for the desires of the Commission 177 regarding work sessions for zero lot line and site plan draft ordinances, answer from Chairman Lewis, not until after the landfill -Y f question is decided. Commissioner Smalley stated that he has some :..:-... questions on the zero lot line draft and since the construction season is near would like to move ahead with that. Chairmen Lewis felt that since there was no recent activity that it could wait. Commissioner Smalley suggested the meeting following the next landfill public --• - hearing which would be March 26th, the Commission agreed. This would - .�.•-., be a work session on the zero lot lane and site plan draft ordinance u only. Comprehensive plan review would be kept a separate subject. Commissioner Zubeck asked for feedback from the zero lines approved in Central Heights, answer no. No complaints have been received. " 9. REPORTS n o � u a. City Council .� _rr Councilman Wise reported on the road project for Eagle Rock& awarded an engineering contract for a dock in the rivers the Old Town '=. Committee is going to research viability for creating a historic x_ district and the associated road projects. �. 4_3 Commissioner Smalley asked for the criteria of the Council when the ' 1 Fisherman's Packing lease was turned down by the Council. Councilmen _:. . Wise explained that at least one member of the Council felt it was not Councilman Wise the details or �.�.. a legitimate request. could not recall the vote. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer explained that, at the time there was interest from other parties in the land. And further - �:=1" that since the lessee's had come in and made a presentation with a development schedule and not lived up to the plans that they probably = .�'. would not be able to live up to the second one also, and since there ,'.`..'.. was interest in the land by other parties, the land could be put to a ; " good use. Commissioner Osborne asked for input on the denial recommendation for __-- the liquor license renewal of the Pines. Councilman Wise explained - that the City has token input to the ABC Board on liquor license -- -,°�. --- renewals. The fact that the Council wrote a letter of objection was due to severe litigation and default. There are numerous liens against - °�'� the property and they are in foreclosure. ' :.Y-q:. b. Borough Planning kp•__ �f Commissioner Bryson reported on a request by the Kschemak Gun Club to = approve a site. The request was denied due to the close proximity to a new subdivision. 4 ® PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 26, 1986 Page 9 ,.,. c. Ci, tv Administration None s 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD Mr. Leo Oberts spoke to the Commission on the Old Town study stating _ that now is the time to start planning for a gala event as Kenai will be 200 years old. Mr. Oberts is looking into funding as is Mr. Wise. t Mr. Oberts would like to see Old Town a "tourist trap". Kenai has a_ - unique spot that is going unnoticed. . Mr. Oberts stated that through his travels he has found that the zero _ lot line concept is accepted and is possibly the way of the future. Mr. Oberte next spoke on parking in the commercial district. A great deal of land is being "wasted" on parking. A better idea would be a central parking. ;, Mr. Oberts addressed the Kenai River encouraging the Planning Commission _ to take authority for lands adjoining the river. - - 11. INFORMATION ITEMS No comments, no questions7• 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS 6 QUESTIONS None - 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 PM. =- Janet Loper -- --- -- — -- } Planning Specialist 3 -•3y X N 0 H of KENAI PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION March 11, 1986 Kenai City Hall Richard Hultberg, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Present: NeComsey, Siebert, Smith, Wright Absents Hultberg, Siekswitch, 2, PERSONS SCHEDULED TO 8E HEARD a. Caseball Fields Carol Osborne, Kenai resident. Mrs. Osborne stated that she would like to see new baseball fields, this item for discussion was referred C it A .. 0 to the Parke 0 Rec Commission by the ounc A) reasons for needing a new fields 1. it takes 2 years to make a field 2. short of fields last year, a lot of games had to be played at " night, share with the American Legion and dust bowl 3. S team increase last year, possibly 4 more teams this year 4. charter for big league ball, 16-16 years old S. the dust bowl is going to be used for business by next year which makes 1 less field Gladys Routh. Mrs. Routh stated that there are new minor league teams and possibly major leagues for softball. We can not turn kids down which will become necessary .with these new adult teams. Ozzie Osborne. Kenai resident. Mr. Osborne stated that he is opposed to the possibility of closing over night camping at the Municipal Park. A possibility would be to start charging campers. MOTIONt Commiseioner McComsey moved, seconded by Commissioner Wright to recommend to Council that the Municipal Park remain a 72 hour camp- ground with•no fees until such time that the City or private enterprise provides an alternate camping site. VOTEt Motion passed unanimously 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 4. 1906 Minutes approved as submitted • � .4b At a PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION March 11, 1986 Page 2 4. DIRECTOR's REPORT a. Trip -to Washington D.C. Director Keyo McGillivray discussed his trip with the Commiseion. b. City league Basketball The League is in its final week. Single elimination tournament for A, 61, & 62. c. Budget The budget is being handled differently this year. The budget will noto-- go to City Manager but straight to Council. A report will come later :. after Council review. =' d. Summer Workers There are quite a few applications. S. OLD BUSINESS None 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Closino of Municipal Park Discussed earlier in the meeting b. Arco Jesse Owens Games June 28th is the date for the preliminary meetings in Kenai. Winners go to Anchorage and are called South Alaska Regional. There are eight regions and Alaska has two of them. Speculation is that this may be the lest year of the Games. MOTIONt Wright moved, seconded by Commissioner McComsey to Commissionerg - nominate Dick Hultberg as Chairman and Roger Siebert as Vice Chairman . .............. _. VOTE e R Motion passed unanimously _ 7. BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE REPORT a. Minutes included in your packet. -- r • as .. - ., .. .. � ` �.__ '�-�, ' r o ,• 6' q _ jo PARKS 8 RECREATION COMMISSION March 11, 1986 Page 3 ' 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS 8 QUESTIONS Nonet P 9. A03CURNMENT ry There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting of th* Commission is Tuesday, April 1, 1986 at 7:00 PM. Janet Loper. Secretary (from wri*.tan COPY) z tv n: _ w ' n ��tr• ..�wli'r�►iicw'�ii:..:+.. , .4 n , • ram,. _ ... ., ,. — • . - - dly U d r h# Monthly Planning Calendar; angRenger'n` 60 Months of Flexible Plans at a Glantz i .0nMlipe•off Magnet Symbols 133 possible color/shape codes) you modify plans instantly. To update • move the magnetic dates. f ' lo. I.1148 4x8' Magnetle Planner scheduler 44 programs for 80 mat he&71 LongRangett'" Magnetic Five -Year Planning Calendar Kit No. LR46 4'xA' $749.00 complete with board & magnets 94MR1010 lit Inctudaa a handsome framed, gridded magnetic board 4•x 8' 0010-11110d for this system, 601 "x 10" magnetic cardholders in 8 colors and lettermo. sets for project names, cards in 8 colors, 600 writeen/wipe•off 'magnet symbols in 3 @hopes & 11 colon 133 possible coda), magnetic moni and year headings 120 yam), magnet marking pens & extra line tape. 12-Month Planning Calendar Master Planning • Goals, Deadlines, Quotes, etc. Magnetic Daily Jc ,�iyAro,e w�rsrov • A Sv 6s8ST�Au �Qdc .doe �1�0 Tisr6te r►a �Y �Ob or�i . ,6 So TiYiw�ir 7,iK/s • �s ra►J- 004rr �era io ,g a/ r se 7T61Tii/ reposition the Eric magnetic data. Everything is In view for fast reference action. Rough -plan a full year of 110 note clip nod projects & activities for your u o s. a tam@ Ug to organization & yourself with IDLOL Magnetic this easy -to -change planning -fdhcldwnanut' calendar. Multicolored write- Plate coma with on magnets & cardholders tot g • ans & thee handsome you focus on seasons & quar• MognetlaWoodO tern, color - group our tLns & board will look quickly vise a move them. beautiful In your office. + I �T no. M�7Z. ZN7' 1Z MO. Catandat SZ4e These kits camas with lnx 311 magnetic cardholders in 6 colors and write-on/wipe-off magnets in 9 bright colors. , ' 1"x 3" magnetic cardholder shown full also. Words come in 8 colors) IE J1__K"9I:oJ Capacity I Magnets- 1COMPIM 1 Comalatf Kit Includ 01, L .r r: der board, i year heads, is ; �1 t Kit No. DOM 2xr schedules up to 18 obe dolly for 14 days for wke.l $299.00 complete wl aecassoNa. ooam. unia Tor this eye. tem. t x2" magnetic card- holders & writs -on map. note In 8 colon, cards. magnet marking pens, moonset symbols, moll. don, day & month at, letter/no. at & extra line tool. Magnetic IAessage Boards Kit No. OM23 2' x 3' 14 people $299.00 Magnetic Nameplate cordholder soma with lettering at. PEOPLE site Am Kit .11-1 Complete Pricemad ij111.j¢6t a fro. agnet.c•WOod lined bard. In -Out up to 2x2' OM22 $249.00 9.14 2x3' OM23 290 00 magneto, mall, card x holders & cards. lit. 22. 35 4rT OM43 81900 & no. sets, & 2-lb. x a person, title 61 •70 4x8' OM46 729,00 extra line tape. MyM 4x4 301 —9 holder$. coral. ppaen 3(IIngoLamer IyatMia are Inaiuda@ born wnta•on magnate & mall. e@rdrrtl1"M mall. symbols 111co1. Coll 8 regaalt. Ce1131a988.3033 elm N 01" from go PUwy only♦IMa�/1 %�jpfOdYCii eatu iu �,...r n.�. go a14. . Nam.. %F—& 4IfM 'P., N/ oxsa aaai •+ •1! 0 F March 6, 1986 CITY C 1 lod 0604W Ur I I a10 NOMM XNAL ALABU OW Mr. John B. Patterson, Esq. 880 "H" Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Re: lots 4-8, FBO Subdivision, City of Kenai Blue Mountain Ventures Dear Mr. Patterson: 0 On February 28, 1986 you telephoned this office and asked to speak with Dena Gerstlauer regarding the above -referenced property. She was on vacation and in lieu of Ms. Gerstleuer, my :... . secretary informed you I would contact you in writing regarding the matter. Subsequent to the call, we received your letter dated February 28, 1986. w ' I want to emphasize that Blue Mountain Ventures (BMV) is seriously in default of their lease. BMV's economic problems related to further development are irrelevant. I am enclosing' copies of the original deed whereby the FAA granted its lands to : the City of Kenai. You will note that Paragraph 6 on Page 8 requires aeronautically related uses. This requirement is not a requirement the City of Kenai imposed arbitrarily. The requirement is a deed restriction and to allow BMV to put the property to other then an aeronautical use would subject the City to action from the FAA, including possible forfeiture. a This is not to say that BMV and yourself cannot comedy 8MV19 ---'`- default. My suggestion is that you contact the FAA and obtain a written waiver of enforcement of the deed restriction as to BMV's -.-- - - - property. Once we overcome this threshold problem, then the City Council will be in a position to matte a decision regarding the f" development schedule. Y_ 1 �r► .-suu tsi .i�� .e�_- �..u.��-.. _..��n_.�,._.s.. .•. -_..�at�Or�-'aaskuJafir.4i➢,..9i- - ,.. .:,i 77 r, o - _ _ _ _ —x. •_ Lr•xk ... —rW _ u .q� In order to give you adequate time to negotiate with the FAA, I will not file any Forcible Entry and Detainer Proceedings.(beeed on development schedule defaults) until April 15p 1986. If ou have any further questions, pleaae present them to me in writing here at the City of Kenai. Sincerely, CI 0 K AI m ers Cit Attorney TR/clf Enclosures ' }t n n. . tiooc7 &AA. 40 3SM , at+ts,eu QvrrCLADEED sawn L v • t��� ��°• THIS INDENTURE, made as of the let day of December 1983.twgelPl the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the Administrato Services under and pursuant to the powers and authority contained in the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (63 Stat. 377) and the Surplus property Act of 1944 (58 $tat. 705) as amended. and regulations and orders promulgated thereunder. hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor", and the Cur OF IWAI, a municipal corporation of the State of Alaska. hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee". . WITNESSETH: That Grantor. for and in consideration of the assumption by the Grantee of all the obligations and its covenant to abide by and agreement to certain reservations, restrictions and condition@, all' am set out hereinafter, does hereby remise. release and forever quitclaim unto Grantee# its transferees, successors and assigns, under and subject to the reservations, exceptions, restrictions and conditions hereinafter set out, all of the Graatoris right, title and interest in and to ° that certain real property located in Kenai. Alaska and more particularly described ass All those certain lands comprising the Kenai Airport. Kenai. Alaskao located in T. 5N. , R. 11W. t and T. ON., R. 11W. , S. M.. North and Northwest of the uwmite of Kenai. Alaska and situated is the Ketui Recording Precinct, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, being more particularly described as follows: WJ of Section 28; SE} of Section 20. Section 32; Wt Section 33 all lying in T. 8 N., R. 11 W. , S.M.: AND Lot No. 11 (NEk NEO; Lot No l 3. (NWJJ NE}); Lot No. 3,e :. 14EJ NWT); Lot NiP4 (NW* NWT); Lot 140:"5 (SWJ NEJ), all =4 lying in Section 5; AND, that portion of the st of the NW} Section r, 5, T., 5 IN., R. 11 W., S.M. commemmug at the corner common to Sections 31 and 32. T. 8 N.. R. 11 W.. S. M. and r Sections 5 and 8, T. 5 IN., R. 11 W., S. M. thence proceed S. 0' 09' E. 9320.73 feet along the line between Sections 6 " 7 and 8 to the true point of beginning; thence continue S. 0. 090 IS. 331.98 test along said section line to a points thence S. 00111 E. 495.33 feet to a point: thence N. 89*530 E. 783.30 feet to a points thence N. 0' tie W.41.25 toot to a potatt thence N. 800 531 E. 123.82 feet to a point; thence S. 0' it' E. 41.25 test to a points ; thence N. 690 531 E. 412. 21 test to a points thence N. 0. 081 W. ' 4ff 51.40 feet to a points thence N. 84' 281 45" E. 1325.04 last to a point; thence N. 0' 07' W. 672.54 tact to a 1pti thence L - 89. 530 W. 2638.08 test to the point of beglanmi AND, that - -- portion of the E} of the NEJ. Section 8. T. 5 N.. R. 11 W.. S. M. cominenoing at the corner common to 84001110 31 and 33, { T. 8 N.. R. 11 W. S. M. and 89atlontt 5 and 8, T. 5 N.. R. - 11 W. , S. N: & which is the trw polar of bertmdiq of We z . ::, C L . Qpp) Qa ACC Yaai P.aoordloj Dtrulat description; thence proceed West 880 feet along the line between Sections 31 and 8 to a point; thence S. 00 111 E. 1037.13 feet to a' point; thence S. 710 159 E. 300.76 feet to a point; thence S. 170 1It W. 544. 90 feet to a point; thence East $30. 07 feet to a point on the line between Sections 8 and 5: thence along Bald Una N. 00 091 W. 1658.71 feet to the point of beginning. 21, o ►•••.� . EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described tracts of ]ands Commencing at the corner common to Sections 5 and 8. i' T. 5 M . R. 11 W.. S. M.. ead Sections 31 and 32, T. ON., R. 11 W.. S. M.. which is the true point of beginning of A ��'� this description; thence proceed N. 00 081 W. 860 feet along _... . the line between Sections 31 and 32. thence East 073. 55 feet to a point; thence S. 280 401 W. 837.68 feet to a point; thence West 470 feet to a point; thence N. 00 091 W. 75 feet to the point of beginning of this description; AND, the .;.. .. -iE}SW}NW}SEJNW#: and the E}W}SW#NWJSE}NWJ of Section 5. T. , 5 N. , R. 11 W.. S. M. TOGETHER WITH the following described improvements located thereon: (a) 1, 000, x 150' gravel aircraft runway No. 18-36. (b) Gravel aircraft parking area complete with tie down cat (a) Gravel aircraft auxiliary parking area complete with tie down cables. t = (d) Gravel Helio-Port. (e) Gravel loading and unloading area for aircraft. (t) Field lighting system A. N. C. medium intensity series. (g) One rotating internally illuminated beacon with a retractable wind cone mounted on a 51 toot steel tower. RESERVING TO the United States of America, its transferees and asdgns, the right to use. occupy and maintain Government -owned facilities wllh right of ingress and egress thereto, over the following described tracts located within the boundaries of the Kenai Airport. The tracts ere more " particularly described as: TRACT A-1 Commencing at the corner common to Sections 32 and 33. T. 8 N.. R. 11 W. , S. M. , and Sections 5 and 4. T. 5 N. R. 11 W.. S. M ro S. Oo 041 E. 1316.1 toot to a — - -- " poise: thence 89 5 1080.3 toot to the true point of - beginning; thence N. 41 341 W. 400 toot to a point; thence S. 470 290 W. 1110 toot to a point; thence S. 17• tie W. 950 feet to a point; thence N. 890 531 E. 1158.34 teat to a point; thence N. 00 071 W. 1321.11 feet to a point; thence N. 890 530 E. 305 feet to the point of beginning, an area containing 29. 770 acres moll. Q z c� Fr • >s00 f0a AQP....�� • �a°i Aeoord;es Dbtrlet TRACT A-8 Commencing at the centerline of Runway 18-36. at Station 14 + 00; proceed S. 610 20' E. 280 feet to the true point of beginning of this descriptions thence S. 28° 40t W. 200 feet to a pout= thence S. 610 20' E. 400 feet to a point; thence N. 280 40' E. 400 feet to a point; thence N. 81• 200 W. 400 feet to a point; thence S. 280 40' W. 200 feet to the point of beginning, an area containing 3.873 acres tall. TRACT A-3 Commencing at the centerline -end of Runway No. 38. which is Engineer Station 0 + 00; thence proceed S. SO 20' E. 150 feet to the southeast corner of Runway No. 36. which Is the true point of beginning, and Corner No. 1 of this deserlp- tion: thence proceed N. 280 401 E. 78 feet along the east edge of said runway to Corner No. 2; thence S. 610 201 E. 180 foot to Corner No. 3; thence N. 84° 101 E. 610 feet to Corner No. 4; thence S. 8° 801 E. 300 feet to Corner No. 8; thence S. 840 10' W. 678 feet to Corner No. 6; thence N. 8' 800 W. . 283. 81 feet to Corner No. 7. thence N. 610 20' W. 180 feet to Corner No. 1 and the true point of beginning, an area containing 4.831 acres mil. AND RESERVING TO the United States of America. Its transferees and assigns the following: An easement with the right of access thereto for the purpose of construction, operation. maintenance. repair, removal or ° replacement of existing Government -owned overhead and - r underground power and communication lines as now located ` within the boundaries of the Kenai Airport. An easement with right of access thereto for the purpose of r ; construction, operation, maintenance, repair, removal or replacement of the existing Government -owned neon -tubing approach lighting system located at the north end of Runway . 18.38. "Z. .. The right of ingress and egress on, over and across all established streets, highways or trailways as they presently exist or as they may be modified hereafter and to all other areas within the boundaries of the Kenai Airport. The right to use and occupy space on the lands transferred by this deed and on other lands which may be subsequently - -- - ' acquired by the City of Kenai. Alaska for use in connection with the operation of the Kenai Airport together with all necessary easements for power. control lutes and cables, Including the right of access to and from any such space and said rights, use. and occupancy by the United States of America to be without charge. •2- L wool. -P[:, eooeaz PACE io 4 i Yeo.i nc�,Q utwiat ' n EXCEPTING AND RESERVING TO the United States of America. its transferees and assigns. all oil and gas in the land above described, together with the right tb prospect for, mine and remove the same {_ P. under applicable laws and regulations heretofore and hereafter established by the Secretary of the Interior. SUBJECT TO the following oil and gas leases now of record in the Office of the Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior: 1. OII and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 028113 , 2. Oil and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 030247 dI o P 3. Oil and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 048234A 4. Oil and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 080117 8. Oil and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 080804 8. Oil and Gas Lease Anchorage Serial No. 083741 SUBJECT TO the following permits and rights -of -way now of record ` in the Office of the Bureau of Land Management. United States ... Department of the Interior: 1. Free use gravel permit issued to Bureau of Public Roads now assigned to State of Alaska. Department of Public Works. Anchorage aerial No. 030412. 2. Free use gravel permit issued to Bureau of Public Road now assigned to State of Alaska. Department of Public Works. Anchorage serial No. 031635. 3. Special land use permit issued to Peninsula Development Corporation. P. O. Box 633. Anchorage, Alaska. ;1 Anchorage serial No. 088378. 4. Special land use permit issued to Paul D. Whiteman. Anchorage serial No. 055618. y' .1.. 8. Electric power pole line right-of-way issued to Kenai Power Corporation, Kenai, Alaska. Anchorage serial ' No. 057062. EXCEPTING, HOWEVER, from this conveyance all right, title and • : °•. interest in and to all its property in the nature of equipment, furnishings and other personal property located on the above described premises which can be removed " from the land without material injury to the land or structures located thereon, other than property of such nature located on the promises conveyed hereby which is reasonably necessary for the operation or maintenance of the airport or for the —T operation or maintenance of the structures and improvements specifically listed hereinabove as being transferred hereby or for any reasonable use for which such structures or improvements are readily adaptable; and further excepting from tl �.: conveyance all its structures on said remises other than structures s ecific -- A Y P to WY �n� described or enumerated above as being conveyed hereunder; and reserving to the -,� ;;.� .-_:.ram=•.' 1 2 LM G appLiLreA� !. � . Grantor, for itself and its lesees� ��pe-�i�mitt=•Geese, agents and assigns the right to use the property and structures excepted hereby in such a manner ar will net materially and adversely affect the development. Improvement, operation or maintenance of the airport and the right of removal from said premises of Mob property and structures, all within a reasonable period of time after the date hereot, which shall not be construed to mean any period more than one (1) year otter the date of execution of this instrument, together with a right of Ingress to and egress from said premises for such purposes. All of the property transferred hereby was both duly determined to be surplus to the needs and requirements of the United States of America and was assigned to the Administrator of General Services for disposal pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 ind applicable rules, regulations and orders. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises. with appurtenances. except the property excepted above and the rights reserved above under and subject to the reservations, restrictions and conditions set forth In this instrument, unto Grantee, Its transferees, successors and assigns, forever. By the acceptance of this deed or any rights hereunder, the said Grantee, for itself, Its transferees, successors and assigns, agrees that the transfer of the property herelnabove transferred by this instrument is accepted subjpot to the following restrictions set forth in subparagraphs (1), (3). and (3) of this paragraph, which shall ran with the land, imposed psrsuent to the authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 9 of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Federal -Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, the Surplus Property Act of 1944. as amended thereby, and the applicable rules, regulations and orders. Ill That, except as provided in subparagraph (6) of the next succeeding unnumbered paragraph, the land. buildings, structures. Improvements and equipment in which this Instrument transfers any Interest shall be used for public airport purposes for the use and benept ' of the public, on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination and without grant or exercise of any exclusive might for use of the tirpoet ±: y .,tHE .f. 11 �1 ` -1 -1 1 C C L F 1 i /.+•ref= . rice a r• AaF- �° L. . Kona neaording t�rera within the meaning of the terms "exclusive right" as used in subparagraph (4) of the next succeeding paragraph. As used in this instrument, the term "airport" shall be deemed to include at least all such land. buildings. structures. improvements and equipment. J (2) That, except as provided in subparagraph (6) of the next succeeding- paragraph. the entire landing area. as defined in GSA Reg. 2-1-t02. 01 a. 11 (44 C. F. R. 101.10). and all structures, improvements. utilities, facilities and equipment in which this instrument transfers any interest shall be maintained for the use and benefit of the public at all times in good and serviceable condition. provided. however. that such = maintenance shall be required as to structures. improvements, utilities. facilities and equipment only during the remainder of their estimated life, as determined by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency or his successor. In the event materials are required to rehabilitate oC repair certain of the aforementioned structures, improvements. utilities, facilities. or equipment, they may be procured by demolition of other structures, improvements. utilities, facilities or equipment transferred hereby and located on the above described premises which have outlived their use as airport property in the opinion of the Adatintetrator of the Federal Aviation Agency or his successor. (3) Subsurface rights to minerals or other interests inducted in the real property conveyed herein shall not be exploited in such a way as will interfere with the efficient operation of the airport. By the acceptance of this deed or any rights hereunder. the said Grantee, for itself, its transferees. successors and assigns. also assumes the obligation of, covenants to abide by and agrees to, and this transfer is made- subject to, the following reservations and restrictions set forth in subparagraphs (1) to (7). inclusive, of this paragraph, which shall run with the land, imposed pursuant to the authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Fl _ Property and Administrative Services Act of 1040, the Surplus Property Act of to", '- as amended thereby, and applicable notes, regulations and orders. {„ .. L. a M 1 1421 ROCCUUng OW410 (1) That insofar as it is within its powers, the Grantee shall 1 adequately clear and protect the aerial approaches to the airport.by {111 removing, lowering. relocating, marking or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards. (3) That the United States of America (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Government") through any of its employees or agents , shall at all times have the right to make nonexclusive use of the landing area of the airport at which any of the property transferred by this Instrument is located or used, without charge; Provided, however. that i such use may be limited as may be determined at any time by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency or his successor to be a .. necessary to prevent undue interference with the use by other authorized aircraft; Provided, further, that the Government shall be obligated to pay for damages caused by such use. or it its use of the landing area is -' substantial. to contribute a reasonable share of the cost of maintafaina and ° operating the landing area, commensurate with the use made by it. - (3) That during any national emergency declared by the President __ + of the United States of America or the Congress thereof. the Government shall have the right to make exclusive or nonexclusive use and have - exclusive or nonexclusive control and possession, without charge, of the 11 _-1 airport at which any of the property transferred by this instrument is located or used, or of such portion thereof as it may desire, provided. - however. that the Government shall be responsible for the entire cost of maintaining such part of the airport as it may use exclusively, or over which it may have exclusive possession or control during the period of -- -- - - -- such use. possession, or control, and shall be obligated to contribute a reasonable share, commensurate with the use made by it, of the cost of �'. ;, v• �r"= maintenance of such property as it may use nonexelusively or over which it may have nonexclusive control and possession; Provided. further, that the Government shall pay a fair rental for its use, control, or possession exclusively or nonexcktsivsly of any improvements to the airport made .. C L c + eooR2LaU/-PACLjz.4 Kemf RMT&S Dbblot (4) That no exclusive right for use of the airport at which the Property transferred by this instrument is located shall be vested (directly or indirectly) in any person or persons to the exclusion of others in the same class, the terse "exclusive right" being defined to meta t � (a) any exclusive right to use the airport for conducting any e particular aeronautical activity requiring operation of aircraft; (b) any exclusive right to engage to the sale or supplying of aircraft, aircraft accessories, equipment, or supplies (excluding • n the sale of gasoline and oil), or aircraft services necessary for - - the operation of aircraft (including the maintenance and repair of 41 aircraft, aircraft engines. propellers and appliances). (S) That, except as provided in subparagraph (6) of this paragraph, ... rs the property transferred hereby may be successively tsar.-cforred onhv- . with the proviso that any such subsequent transferee assumes all the obligations imposed upon the Grantee by the provisions of this instrument. (6) That no property transferred by this instrument shall be used, leased. Bold, salvaged, or disposed of by the Grantee for other than airport purposes without the written consent of the Administrator of the Federal R. Aviation Agency, which Aball be granted only if said Administrator ' determines that the property can be used, leased. sold, salvaged or disposed of for other than airport purposes without materially and adversely U" affecting the development, improvement, operation or maintenance of the r s airport at which such property is located. o, (7) The Grantee does hereby release the Government. and will -? take whatever action may be required by the Administrator of General Services to assure the complete release of the Government from any and _ • : _ all liability the Government may be under for restoration or other damages _ under any lease or other agreement covering the use by the Government of the airports or part thereof, owned. controlled or operated by the® �= Orantee. upon which. adjacent to which. or in connection with which. any property trnnetereed by this instrument was loeaeed or useds Provided. • .. . , _ � s it J • _ `-� 11( C gGOlr7 ���'%�'.1Ci►.�1L. . ilecrl A000tdlog Dbtrlet that no such release shall be construed as depriving the Grantee of any right it may otherwise have to receive reimbursement under Section 17 of the Federal Airport Act for the necessary rehabilitation or repair of public airports heretofore or hereafter substantially damaged by any Federal agency. By acceptance of this instrument or any rights heregnder, the Grantee ......... further agrees with the Grantor as follows: r _ (1) That in the event any of the aforesaid terms. conditions. - reservations or restrictions are not met, observed. or complied with by the Grantee or any subsequent transferee, whether caused by the wF legal inability of the Grantee or subsequent transferee to perform any of the obligations herein set out. or otherwise. the title. right of possession and all other rights transferred by this instrument to the -' Grantee, or any portion thereof, shalt at the option of the Grantor revert to the Grantor sixty (60) days following the date upon which demand to this effect is made in writing by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation ►gency or his successor in function. unless within said sixty (00) days moh default or violation shall have been cured and all such terms, muditions, reservations and restrictions shall have been met, observed i )r complied with. in whioh event sold reversion shall not occur and title,�� right of possession, and all other rights transferred hereby, except such. It any, as shall have previously reverted. shall remain vested in the - Grantee, ita transferees, successors and assigns. (2) Thst it the construction as covenants of any of the foregoing reservations and restrictions recited herein as covenants or the application of the same as covenants in any particular instanoe is held invalid. the ; u; particular reservations or restrictions in question shall be construed instead merely as conditions upon the breach of which the Government may exercise its option to cause the title. right of possession and ail _ .y other rights transferred to the Grantee. or wW portion thereof, to revert T C liana Recording Olrbict . to it. and the application of such reservations or restrictions as covenants In any other instance and the construction of the remainder of such reservations and restrictions as covenants shall not be affected thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year first above written. UNITED STATES OF AIVIERiCA Acting by and through the Administrator of General Services By, (6, . k. CC a4a., Chief. Real Property Division Utilization and Disposal Service STATE OF WASHMOTON ) ) as COUIM OF K114G ) On this ��� day of ,1964, before the undersigned, a .rotary Public in and for the State of Washington. personally appeared to me known to be the Chief, Real Property Division. Utilization and Disposal Service, General Services Administration, n Region 10, and to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and who under oath stated that he was duly authorized, empowered and delegated by the Administrator of General Services to execute the said instrntaeat end acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed, acting for and on behalf of the Administrator of General Services. acting for and on behalf of the United States of America, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, f have hereunto set my hand and affixod my official seal the day and year in this certificate above written. otary Public in an or the tate o' Washington, residink at Federal Way �, • FILED RECORO� r. own OF @logo"" :1 F . CITY o'3 MOPMAM 11CI m.ftw 01N1 ones@ '— TELEPMONB dd,1 • Ltd March 11, 1966 Lottie Edelmen, President Fisherman's Pecking, Inc. Drawer 530 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Re: Lot 1, Kenai Spit Subdivision Dear Me. Edelman: On February 69 19869 I sent you a letter and enclosed a copy of the verbatim of the January 229 1986 Council Meeting. In that letter I asked you to respond to the Council's denial of your extension to conform with development requirements. I specifically asked what your intentions are relevant to the property at this time. On March 6, 1986 this office received a letter from you which detailed, among other things, your desire to lease the south 400 feet of Lot 19 and your feelings about development of the river front. The letter in no way explains how you intend to remedy the development default. Accordingly, you are given thirty (30) days from receipt of this letter to quit the premises. Failure to do so will result in the filing of a Forcible Entry and Detainer action in the District Court for the Third Judicial District at Kenai, Alaska, immediately upon expiration of those thirty days. Sincerelyp C OF NAI 1 . im •R " ere City Attorney TR/ol f d+ -�; Q n t� . 7. +N 4 �✓ 163 Main .Street Loop KBNAI. ALABKA Aedt 1 REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1986 Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books Fiction 1527 353 1342 �.._ Ron -Fiction 1997 182 231 Total Book Circulation 5632 a Films, Phonodiscs, Pamphlet, Periodicals 486 Total Circulation 6118'-- Additions Adult Juvenile Easy Books AV Total Gifts 80 7 6 16 109 _ Purchases 113 27 7 3 ISO Total Additions 259 Remedial and Re -worked Books Adult Juvenile AV 33 2 1 36 ; Interlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned Books 63 80 59 AV 35 53 62 LL Interlibrary Loans by our Library y. r Books 73 AV 71 z Volunteers Number 36 Total Hours 579 - - --- - -=---- = Income Fines and Sale Books 488.00 Lost or Damages Books 39.20 g' ® Xerox 258.00 f L Donations 5.00 P" Total Income for February 1986 $790.20 ---- . P S u A PUBLIC I.19VAIM /N 41MG2 •INB2 IRA 163 Main Street Loop KENAI. ALASKA 99611 LIBRARY CARDS ISSUED FEBRUARY 1986 Kenai 234 Clam Gulch 2 Kasilof 16 North Kenai 41 Soldotna 74 Sterling S Anchorage 1 TOTAL CARDS ISSUED 373 LIBRARY PATRONAGE .... 6,006 1 •r /''•,.� ' •7.. .' war-'- �.:�V'4'f:.'+.(1?I;HYfi*Aid •,Pry ;w•+�(' •�t�' ^yam. f. �.[ -Ik tall. 10 i � ^ AWN irw•J u'R_7.5. C N E KENAI BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 11, 1906 Kenai City Hall Tim Wisniewski, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL ' Presents Wisniewski, Hakkinen, Sheldon Absents Nelson, Selby, excused Also Present: Councilwoman Bailie, Carmen Gintoli and Steve Paliwota Architects, and Phil Bryson and Mark Waring of Wince, Corthell, Bryson=-- 2. AGENDA APPROVAL Agenda approved as submitted r 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD a. Discussion: Triangle Park - Phil Bryson of Wince, Corthell, Bryson Attendina - Mr. Carmen Gintoli, architect, started off discussion with a brief description of the RFP and his own proposal as subcontractor to Wince, Corthell, Bryson. Copies of the Kasprisin design were present. Mr. Gintoii's verbal rendering of the design appeared to be a blend of options 1 and 2, with berming a central portion. City Engineer LaShot _ Informed the Committee that HEA has a summer project to move the �- - overhead power lines and run them underground. Mr. LeShot cautioned those present to be mindful of the water lines as there is a possibility of breaking the lines with heavy berming. The Committee expressed concern with the maintenance of berming, Mr. Gintoli explained that if a material such as Sitka strawberries were used, it would eliminate the need for mowing and heavy watering and = i would prevent eroding due to its root structure. The Committee discussed ways of keeping vehicular traffic from destroying the Suggestions included pole spikes, boulders, high curbs, and ,. �roject. enchee. The Committee introduced the idea of banners surrounding the perk, more information is forthcoming, however, it was widely accepted. The material from Heidi Snow wee circulated, Mr. Gintoli agreed that his design encompassed the same general design used fors-.":." the Marine Park with the berming, seats, and walkwaye.Mr. Gintoli -- --:----;--'�;, suggested the same wooden material used for the landscaped wallo for the poles. J. The Committee next discussed sidewalks surrounding the park. The ".. Committee agreed that it would be a retainer and would be easier to: maintain. Mr. Bryson pointed out that the contract called for r s 51 BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 11, 1906 Page 2 sidewalks on the westerly side of Airport Way only. The Committee further agreed that, considering the type of large development that is forcasted for that area, sidewalks along both sides of Airport Way should be seriously considered. This will be presented to Council for consideration. Mr. Gintoli used the example of Pioneer Ave in Homer for considering sidewalks. Homer designed the sidewalks with a wide spot at certain points to enable flowers, or in our case, planter boxes as opposed to a long line of trees along the street. The Committee discussed the area marked on the Kasprisin plan for sculpture. Mr. Gintoli suggested his firm handle a competition among local artists to do a sculpture for that spot. The Committee discussed material for the berming, with suggestions of . J ' cutting costs by using fill from excavated sites during the summer. This will be worked out with the contractors. The Committee had Indicated a desire to place fill on the downtown triangle strip since _) last summer, Jack LaShot stated that because of water lines, he would prefer doing an evaluation of the site before allowing any core fill. ..�• :.,..:;z, Phil Bryson asked if the Committee desired water to the site, answer yes, for watering purposes. A water fountain for the public was a ; good idea, however, because of vandalism and other considerations it ` was eliminated. a : • Mr. Gintoli will be returning with a drawing of the ideas discussed this date. The Committee will be notified when Mr. Gintoli is ready -_ for submittal. -, 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 5, 1966 Minutes were approved as submitted _ S. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussions Banner Project Heidi Snow is putting together a package which will include at least one design (as a sample) and a coat estimate. The information should be ready for the next meeting. b. Report on Poles/Brackets ' Chuck Perrino has been contacted and requested to put together a package for approval by the Committee. Mr. Perrino suggested a whole package which will include brackets and banners at a cost of $60 We approximately with a one time set up charge of $50 for se -oh design. would furnish the design, Another package would include the brackets to allow the banners to hang from existing poles, and a third package - z t Zv- w • BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 119 1986 Page 3 for setting up separate brackets on the poles. This material should be at the next meeting. Another possibility are the poles described by Mr. Gintoli. If the material is obtained• perhaps Wildwood would be Interested in putting the poles together. Councilwoman Bailie will be ;W attending a meeting of the Prison Board and will keep us informed. t C. Flowers The Committee agreed that the flowers needed to be ordered soon and x„ went over last year's designs in boxes and circles. The purples and tell whites were eliminated and some new species introduced. Committee ---- - Member Sheldon Sheldon will take the pictures to Trinity and point out the boxes most wanted by the Committee. The ten boxes promised the prison will not include the flowers designated by them as being ungrowable. Kayo will be kept informed. 6. NEW BUSINESS None -' 7. PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION REPORT Minutes are attached - no comments 8. COMMITTEE QUESTIONS A COMMENTS None 9. ADJOURNMENT - q. 2 There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 205, PM. sU 1•;. The next regular meeting of the Committee will be Tuesday. March 25th. Janet Loper Secretary LL` w ' '_$�adaf►Ciia.ili7i::J+k{.L�,ds:Ai -� 'r... _.• ., . , ..a:rksui:.. -'.-i L.'3t�A+.f.ii .... .. -r =x „ 5, 7 N FROM: MEMORANDUM CITY OF M �. TMOMIM-7M Y j. � Randy Ernst, Airport Manager City of Kenai f+ T0: Mayor and Council Members City of Kenai DATE: March 149 1986 RE: Updatee on Float Plane Facility and Master Plan Update I have attached, for your convenience, a copy of my memorandum to you dated Jwne 289 1965. The memo outlines a timetable for the Master Plan Update and Float Plane Facility. Master Plane Update According to this timetable, the Master Plan Update is prettx�r (EA) much on schedule (Item 6). The environmental assessment was ' received on January 21, 1986 for administrative review. By February 10, 1986y I forwarded your comments and the FAA's o p•; comments to Robin Sennor of LGL (drafters of the EA). Mr. Sennor then coordinated with Mr. Steve Kurth of the FAA on the wording of the public hearing 'notice. •'T The first notice appeared in The Clarion Anchorage Times and the Daily News on February 17p 1986 which stated the date of the hearing to be March 18, 1986. However, on March 4, 1966 the notice was changed, by FAA directive, stating the hearing date to be March 209 1986 due to a 30 day notice requirement. The first notice allowed only 28 days. During the next 30 days of adverttsing for the public hearings the EA has been mailed to all the necessary federel, statep and local agencies for these approval or objections to the float plane project. To date I have received four (4) replies with no objections noted. .y: float Plane Fecility The next step after the completion of the public hearing is to submit the pre -application for the float plane project which is due on or before March 279 1986. The project then will be reviewed by the FAA and if all goes well, we could expect tentative approval for funding by the end of May (Item 10 on the timetable). This would put the project two weeks pest the targeted date. Land Acquisition The land acquisition for the float plane facility was submitted on a separate pre -application for AIP funds, as recommended by the FAA. The pre -application was sent to the FAA on December 179 1985, but prior to Chet, the land was appraised by two appraisers and one review appraiser (Frykholm do Scheafema; Warfle; and Alaska Valuation Service, Inc.). On November 20, 19859 a letter was sent to the owners of this property advising them the City of Kenai was having the land appraised. A letter offering the owners $120,000.00 wee sent to Dick Mueller Realty (owner's agent) on December 16, 1985. According to FAA AC No. 150/5100-11 (Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance), thirty days were allowed for a response to the City's offer. Mr. Mueller's response of January 169 1986 indicated that the owner refused the offer and stated the purchase price to be $3,500.00 per acre. The Legal Department has been advised of the situation and condemnation of the land appears imminent. To build the strongest case possible, it is felt that the pre -application for both the land acquisition and the float plane facility should be in hand before proceeding. Letters were also requested of the FAA and the Alaska Transportation Consultants to verify the need for the 80 acres. To date, I have received a letter from ATC and should hear from the FAA shortly. And, of course, the pre -application for the float plane facility will be complete on or before March 27, 1986. C) W Summer In conclusion, I am still optimistic about getting the float plane facility project started on or near the end of July 1986. However, there are several variables that could delay the project, i.e. public hearing outcome; input from other agencies; Corps permit; etc. Should the project be delayed until next year, I have submitted a "back-up" pre -application for safety area improvements under the Q approach to Runway 01 and a general aviation (CA) tisdown apron _ :i.. _ - ..(u'�:Yw/i,; 'final .r'� ..�iY�F.i3w.w;i ��• p �1fMrp.:J.•�.`�'tl . _, . � •twa. ! _' V;--_`�?i.. 7. . with corresponding GA taxiway improvements at an estimated cost n. of $834,720.00. This "back-up" project wee initiated due to the City's concern over the potential loss of FY 84 funds. A copy of the "back-up" project is attached. RE/olf G Enclosures ... ., .. _..tea is on • ...v.fijl. -r.�iw+-J,A.i ..: :- •r es:.i r "fir-.`-.f�.'aiT.:s{%:1•i• .. i ,SJ,..:: :.rtr:i.i l.,e�i.ii_ '!r -• ...�5,": - ' -.i 1 ESTIMATE OF COSTS _ Air ort Safety Zone Fill Gradingi Parking, and Taxiwa mmpprrovem- en a Construction $5789000 Engineering Design - 8% $ 469240 „! Construction Management, Inspection, and Surveying - 12% $ 699360 - Administration $ 2 �000 ---- - Subtotal $695,600 - - - -..-- -- Contingency - 20% $139,_ 120 V Project Total $834 720 " JLS/sw `Y o, NA '3 _T" .��"Lf�Ri}�3:9�`tl�H. �...-. .. - .. .1't. .1. ... a. .:{ifY/if 'v���: . _.. rC- ikf-. w.•�'. � `-_� — u�_ y1y Y". - -- J F mm- low GJ FG" Aego,-R Ir �, ,ray }. 3 i • J CITY OF KENAI -od G�.'1A.l o(- 41a" a" 0 ��IM.WY KBNAII ALABKA :oeii TOMMONBM-IM 1 June 289 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tom Wagoner & Kenai Cj Council FROM: Randy Ernst, Airport Manager RE: Time Table for Master Plan Update and Float Plane Facility Master Plan Update 1. RFP advertising - July 29 9 and 16 2. Bid opening - July 31st 3. Award bid by Council - August 7th 4. Bid winner to submit design scope for approval by City and FAA - September 9th 5. FAA approval of design scope and application submitted - September 16th 6. Grant'signed by proper City authorities - September 18th 7. Notice to proceed (FAA) - September 20th Engineering firm (bid winner) to proceed immediately on airport facilities forecasts portions of master plan along with float plane facility to include: environmental impact statement, public hearings and layout plan Be Submit facilities forecasts - February 3, 1986 Float plane environmental impact statement (as required by FAA) and public hearing statement. Continue on with completion of master plan. Float Plane Facility 9. Resubmit preapplicstion for float plane project and start design on float plane basin - February 129 1966 �'- 5'. 0 xs'�Tf4+' w r w / 0 10. Tentative approval from FAA for float plane project and FAA approval of design of basin - May 120 1966 11. RFP advertising - May 159 229 29, 1986 t- 12. Bid opening - June 5, 1986 13. Award bid by Council - June 18, 1986 v 14. Bid winner to start construction - July 3, 1986 15. Float plane basin complete - October 39 1986 16. Master plan update complete - October 209 1986 �. I have consulted with the City Manager, the City Engineer and the FAA Planning Division to present a realistic time table for you for the completion of the master plan update and the float plane project. Please be aware that this time table is subject to many Y: variables, which will necessitate certain time frame adjustment. RE/dg , cc: Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager - Jack La Shot, City Engineer Keith Kornelie, Public Works Director "2 Jim Perham, FAA J-41 ci .. M •3 - .(�:%%.. lti f'•'+Y�s-.r.-.yi r.�:•,al.alai :.ai-�. .. ......_ .1 L�-U'' .rfY •1 .- .. r:.J. ..., . 77 i y5'r Fl ...' • - r R N TOs FROMs DATES SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager Keith Kornelia, Public Works Director March 14, 1986 1986 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS' STATUS REPORT R N TOs FROMs DATES SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Wm. J. Brighton, City Manager Keith Kornelia, Public Works Director March 14, 1986 1986 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS' STATUS REPORT 40 Below is a list of the construction projects that are budgeted for the 1986 construction season: 1. Airport Apron & Willow St. Ext. $106609000 2. E. Aliak, Highbueh, Swires, Bumblebee (HAS) 8219000 3. Inlet Woods Subdivision LID 197449000 4. McCollum, Aliak, Princess, Cinderella, Fox, - > Magic, Linwood Ext. (MAP) 196089000 S. South Spruce Street - paving 4000000 6. Robin, Keneitze, Eagle Rock, Sandpiper, Tern, S. Strawberry 3009000 7. Cook Inlet View Drive & Lilac - paving 750,000 5 (� Be Sewer Interceptor to Thompson Park & �- Lawton Drive - Road, W & S to Golf Course 3009000 9. Airport Way Widening & Landscaping 5709000 10. Airport Master Plan Update 709000 Float Plane Basin 19500,000 11, Flight Service Station 105009000 12. Kenai Boating Facility 1,6859000 13. Gravel & CSS1 Bid 800000 . 14. New Street Lights 700000 15. Street Light Replacement 509000 16. Repair A.P. Fence 20tiO -� TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1391289000 �. These items do not include the following, some of which I have requested through the 86-87 Budget or Federal Revenue Sharing: 1. Seal Coat and Chip Project $ 2009000 2. Repave Wildwood 3, Concrete Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Repairs 409000 - - --T - - ---= 4. New Well House 1,000,000 -.... ... 5. Storage Building 750000 ^� 6. Old Town - Right -of -Way 150,000 , 7. Future LID's 410,000 Be Update Water and Sewer Maps 24,000 9. Clean Water Lines 15,000 10. Niece Machinery, Equipment, & Toole � These items also do not include the many private developments that have started or will start this summer. n The following is a very brief summary of each of the projects listed above: 1. AIRPORT APRON AND WILLOW STREET EXTENSION This project is more then 951 complete. Roalak confre-FT—oret Inc., the general contractor on the project, still has signing, traffic markinge, top soil and seeding to be done on the project. The inspecting firm is Mike Teurtainen, P.E. 2. EAST ALIAK HIGHBUSH SWIRES_,__BUMBLEQEE (HAS) The City of Tenal heida rubiic ear ng or'k5—ession With the residents of the area and with William 3. Nelson & Associates, the inspecting firm on March 11, 1986. In the packet for Council Meeting of March 19, 1986, are three different proposals for Improving this project. The statue report on this project has been delivered to the Council and the public at the Public Hearing by William 3. Nelson. 3. INLET WOODS SUBDIVISION (LID) This project is about 83% complete. D5yle ConsEructioF Company is the general contractor on the project and Wince-Corthell-Bryson are the inspectors. Major items that still need to be completed include top soil and seeding, about 3/4 of the asphalt pavement, signing, pavement marking, lift station, end alumination. 4. McCOLLUM, ALIAK. PRINCESS. CINDERELLA. FOX. MAGIC. LINWOOD (MAP) This pr6J6 t_s little over half completed; Tha general contractor on the project is Zubeck, Inc. and the design engineers and inspectors are McLane and Associates. Road construction, pavement, top soil, seeding, culverte, and water and sewer are some of the main items that need to be completed. 5. SOUTH SPRUCE STREET PAVING The advertisement for bid went Into e paper on Marc6 10, 1986, The pre -bid conference is set for March 259 1986, at 1:00 p.m. The bid opening is set on April 7, 19869 at 2100 p.m. Ocean Tech is the design engineering firm. Public Works hopes to have the construction contract before Council at their April 16, 1986, meeting. We also hope to have the proposals from the engineers on inspection at that same time. 6. ROBIN, KENAITZE, EAGLE ROCK. SANDPIPER. TERN. AND S. STRAWBERRY Pre -bid con erence on this project has-been set for 259 19869 at 2:00 p.m. The bid opening is on April 9, 1986, at 2s00 p.m, OceanTech is the design engineers. We hope to have the proposal for inspection on this project and the award for construction before Council on April 169 1966, N] I R "I 7. COOK INLET VIEW DRIVE AND LILAC PAVING The pre -bid 'Seen con erence oh Me project hasset for March 25t 19669 at 300 p.m. The bid opening is set for April 11, 19869 at 2:00 p.m. OceanTeah is the design engineers. Public Works hopes to have the award of the construction contract before Council on April 16, 1966. We also hope to have the proposals for Inspection at that time. B. SEWER INTERCEPTORS - THOMPSON PARK AND LAWTON DRIVE - ROAD WATL9 AND SEWER TU THE GULF CuUm nce- or e - ryson are presentily WorkIng on the design of this project. We have emphasized the need for the Lawton Drive - road, water and sewer to the Golf Course. As soon as the design work is completed for this portion, we will be going out for construction bids. 9. AIRPORT WAY WIDENING AND LANDSCAPING Wince-Corthell-Bryson are presently workIng on the es gn of this project. There sub -consultant, Carmen Gintoli, has been working with the Beautification and Landscaping Committees in an effort to handle the landscaping in the triangle in front of the Airport. This design has been set high on the priority and as soon as it is completed, we will be going out for construction bide. 10. AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND FLOAT PLANE BASIN There will e e Public Hearing conce n ng the envirinmentir assessment on the Float Plane Facility on March 20, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. It is my understanding that Randy Ernest will be giving a report on this status. 11. FLIGHT SERVICE STATION Carmen Gintoli, the architect on e project, e vered a preliminary set of drawings and specifications to the City on Wednesday, March 12, 1986, The Public Works Department has been trying to work with Mr. Gintoli in an effort to get this project out to bid shortly after the HEA project. Our hope is that we will receive a better price for the project from the successful contractor on the HEA project. If the two projects are done by the same contractor there is a possibility of lower shipping coats and consolidation of materials. Knowing this fact, other contractors will elect probably, submit lower bide. 12. KENAI BOATING FACILITY The contract for design of this pro3ect has been away ed to William J. Nelson and Associates. Allen Houtz made a presentation to Council when the proposal wee presented. Jack LaShot has received verbal approval of the contract language from Allen Houtz. E r_- �-u w•-_, t �t r 13. GRAVEL AND CSS1 There is money in the street budget for repair and maintenance supplies which include gravel and duet control measures. As soon as the weather warms up we will be bidding gravel for street maintenance. At this time the Public Works Department also plane on ordering some CSS1 for dust control; CSS1 is an asphalt emulsion that we will be putting down that is DEC approved for dust control. 14. NEW STREET LIGHTS The City Engineer hoe been working with HEX with coming up with a standard set of specifications for the placement of 47 new street lights. The plan is to complete the specifications and bid this project this spring for an early summer construction. 15. STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT Public Works has been working with e City Manager and So City Attorney concerning this project. In reviewing this project, one needs to closely review the contract specifications; Kornelis' letter to City Electric, dated February 14, 1986; Kornelis' memo to William J. Brighton, dated February 18, 1986; and Kornelis' memo to Brighton, dated March 59 1986. 16. REPAIR OF AIRPORT FENCE This project is to repair areas of e existing Airport Fences This project was bid today, March 14, 1986, and will be presented to Council for construction award at the March 19, 1986, meeting. As you can see from above, the 1986 construction season is going to be very busy for the City of Kenai. The $13,000,000 worth of work listed above does not include inspection, surveying, or testing on the projects. This figure does however, include work that was completed during the 1985 construction season. This was a considerable amount for the first four projects listed above. KK/sw Rel L 13.. GRAVEL AND CSS1 There is money in the street budget for repair and maintenance supplies which include gravel and dust control measures. As soon as the weather warme up we will be a .. bidding gravel for street maintenance. At this time the Public Works Department also plane on ordering game CSS1 for dust control; CSS1 is an asphalt emulsion that we will be putting down that is DEC approved for duet control. t 14. NEW STREET LIGHTS The City Engineer has been working withHEA t with com ng up with a standard set of specifications for ; the placement of 47 new street lights. The plan is to �: d complete the specifications and bid this project this spring for an early summer construction. 4V ,•iF 15. STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT Public Works has been working with e city Nenager and City Attorney concerning this - -- -� project. In reviewing this project, one needs to closely review the contract specifications; Kornelia' letter to City Electric, dated February 14, 1986; Kornelia' memo to William 9. Brighton, dated February f 18 1986; and Kornelia' memo to - Brighton, dated March 59 1986. 16, REPAIR OF AIRPORT FENCE This project is to repair areas of e existing Airport once. This project was bid today, March 149 1986, and will be presented to Council For construction n award at the March 19, 1986, meeting. As you can sea from above, the 1986 construction season is going to , be very busy for the City of Kenai. The $139000,000 worth of work listed above does not include inspection, surveying, or testing on the projects. This figure does however, include work that was completed during the 1985 construction season. This was e considerable amount for the first four projects listed above. KK/sw p. 4� :r '�N