Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986-04-02 Council Packet
I� COUNCIL PACKETS APRIL Kenai City Council Meeting Packet April 2, 1986 F I.. ��•� ' t "T f ' 1 4 • •�/�� � ` • III f a PYrLi011lAlpNOi , .. , , 1'1:. PF 1. Ord. I1Q1•dedno►Vrap Rw/A HAg a Wm. t aZ Conhaot�rAnNndmad for A1ifto l O"P a INVIdon a (NOW W40420.800 0. Wm. Hobos Conhoot AmwWm M tar Adito 2• PM 8&28-AMAMm of land for Fkat Phn Sogn & R.«�.��e•e.••w�pa.A��u�tnodrinp P&g OOM b ewe 4. •TwatW of U"w ucw494W*"Mom LOOP No. 1042 ,o,' I - , t , . . Pablo q bvN�d ro gbnd and . 'Z", ti + .3o m"atin CAAO•. OT t FOR �' i.. • x� a. • o f AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING APRIL 2v 1966 - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1, Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. PERSONS PRESENAT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD D , S o. K d�a�� — r r► V PM �. H a. c -ao rQ. - 1 M +Z v- . 9 p V%. P k °;; � Bobbie Wiggins - Renewal of Ft. Keney Lesse, ensi r 4 Q,� Co -Op Preschool �""'"- a. Representative of Mayor's Council on Aging - Ft. Keney 2. Joanne Buzzell - Replacing Vegetation - MAP Project Assessment District 3. Jill Burnett - Replacing Candlelight Ext, when Golf Course Lease is in Effect • - ' y - C. i wr � t� kbe� -s r , 'D and � ' C>�`k,r- , C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 1, Ord. 1121-66 - Increasing Rev/Appns - HAS Project - $1539568 a, Wm. Nelson Contract Amendment for Additional Design & Inspection Services (New Work) - $20 9800 b. Wm. Nelson Contract Amendment for Additional Inspection Services (Original Contract Work) $25 9548 2. Res. 86-28 - Acquisition of Land for Float PLane Basin 3. Res. 86-29 - Authorizing Participation in State Day Care Assistance 4. *Transfer of Liquor License - Peninsula Moose Lodge #1942 0 S tart MINUTES D. 1. #Regular Meeting - March 199 1986 ; E. CORRESPONDENCE- 1. *Rep. Andre Marrou - Keeping School Bond Interest in .. Municipalities t 2. *AK Dept. of Administration - Municipal Aid Funding ' 3. *AK Dept. of Public Safety - Highway Safety Plan Update ` �! 4. *AK C&RA - Day Care Assistance Application - FY 167 5. *AK DNR - Preliminary Draft - Kenai River Plan -_ F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS , J. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $ItOOO 3. *Ord. 1123-86 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code - Exits & - \ Emergencyscapes •-- B��►1. 1q Zo Mop - 4. *Ord. 11?�B' 86 -Amending ng McKinley ��' Haller/Evergreen/McKinley S. Disc. - Landscaping - Airport Way Triangle Strip 6. Disc. - Spenerd Building Supply - Tie Into City Storm Drain H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. Mayor 4. City Clerk 4 5, Finance Director 6. Planning & Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission - 9. Library Commission - I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ADJOURNMENT �---V--•- --'- --. � ,.,.. ..•. - - - - -'may j���i �riri■r�r•��rri■�■rrirri�l r.�� c�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ��rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs r��rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr® r.� c�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr® mom r����rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr �rr�rrrrrrrrrrrrr�rr■ APRIL 29 1986 INFORMATION ITEMS 1 - Letter from Public Works Director Kornelis to AK DOT - Kenai Regional Transportation Study Update 2 - Billing - Kenai Chamber of Commerce - Arctic Winter Games Promotion 3 - Resource Development Council - International Trade/Industrial Development Meeting - March 26 4 - KPB Agenda - March 189 1966 5 - Resource Development Council - International Trade/Industrial Development Policy Meeting - March 19 6 - Report - Alaska House of Reps - Budget 7 - Letter - Dept. of Interior - Russian Orthodox Church Historic Lendmark, Original Toansite Development 6 - KPB Agenda - 4-1-66 9 - Letter from Public Works Director Kornelie to all Legislators - Kenai Capital Improvement Projects 10 - Waste Disposal Commission Meeting Agenda - 4-2-66 11 - Billing - Quadra - Float Plane Basin 6 Camp Plan, Airport A li tion - Martin Gilge 12 - Comm. 6 Comm. pp ce �:..;. 13 - Trensf. of Funds Under $1,000 - March 14 - Kenai River Special Management Letter - Feb. 25. 1966 15 - Municipal League Legislative Bulletin - March 13, 1986 - -- :y Y 2 INFORMATION FOR CITY OF KENAI COUNCIL MEMBERS CONCERNING RENEWING THE LEASE OF FORT KENAY TO THE KENAI COOPERATIVE PRESCHOOL C W Kenai Child Development Center, Inc. Kenai Cooperative Preschool P.O. Box 1523 Kenai, AK 99611 City of Kenai Council Members 510 Fidalso KenaLp AK 99611 Us Renewal of lease of Fort Kenay to KCP. Dear Council Members As you know, out lease with the City of Kenai for the use of Fort Kesay expires May 170 1986* Ve are at this time requesting from the City Council that this lease be renewed for the 86-87 school year (September 1, 1986 - May 16, 1987). Our situation In still such that we cannot afford any other location for our preschool. tie hope the Council understands that if our lease is not renewed we will be forced to discontinue this such needed service. Since the closing of the Children's Centerg which offered a preschool program, we will be the only facility In Kenai for the pro -elementary education of 3 and 4 year olds. This past school year boo been a happy one at the Fort. The abildTang teachers and parents have grown and prospered In the environment. Ve sincerely hope the Council allows us the opportunity to lease the building again. AN sincerely$ Al Deb Hermansou Kim Gilge Board of Directors for Kenai Cooperative Preschool ILai tz )r Y -I Kenai Child Development Cantor, inc. ® Kenai Cooperative Preschool " The Kenai Child Development Center, inc., doing business as the Kenai Cooperative Preschool, Was formed on 10-1-74 by City of Kenai residents for the pre -elementary education of our 3 and 4 year old children. f ,, We are a tax-exempt, non-profit organisation. Our Sole income is derived from the tuition of our students. We receive no monies from State or Federal Agencies. ^ a We have a morning Session (9100 am - 1100 am) and an afternoon o - session (1200 pm - TOO pm) on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The school is in operation from approximately September 10 through May 15. We observe all holidays that the public school '--------- ---g:. system does. We employ a total of 4 teachers (2 per session). Two parent - volunteers assist the teachers as aides each day. There are 26 volunteer parents that alternate days on which they assist. There are 11 non -volunteering parents (ones which cannot Al'I volunteer usually because they work outside the home). We enroll 40 students per school year. -9 _rL •. � , r_ _ - _�_:.fir• c' b. r ' • - o r A% / nn49.07 W.10 r 1 r m. '0-J AprilloW 701/1 ;04#14#q e#;Ifq"f SUBMITTED BY OWNERS OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LISTED BELOW KENAI, ALASKA 88611 APRIL 1, 1386 I AtTH?' _":O3F5'z:IQD, BEING RE-rVITS -x THE C*711 ~F FINAi ANZ CVNEz8 O COMMERC:=L PFC?_RTY IN THE L`ESCA E0 AREA FCLLOWING, DO HEREBY PET-,T:G`i THE CITY CC''INC!L TC CjAN-3E THE ZON:NG : s THIS CITY LAND FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDE' TIAL. LESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY THPS'E ACRES VI THOHPSCN PARK AND VALHALLA HEIGHTS SL'3LIVISICNIS. SCUTHt.-S-3-7 CF THE ✓_N.A..I 3PUR H11 HWAY► At1Tr SOUTH FFOK \ LUPINE DRIVE AL_G THE I<'BNAI :PJP H:iiiW:1Y TO THE END OF THIS CCl?ERC:AL ZONE. TH:S Ia =L:!i. ? CF THOMPSON PARi', LOTS It :, 3, 4-A► $, 3, 7, anC 8; AND BLOCK 9 OF VALjALLA KE:JH":, LLT3 i AAD DESCRIPTI0:1 NAME (PRINTED) NAME +S:vNATUFE) ADDRESS Ml FAcaw /Awe w i&e •'tea Aefs 40 p.D. Boo, it 9,9& akoxy "Tr�.o �s rsoNMUM Paek �t a9a d pry. _htt 3 -LorS' Nit 's L a �e; dA, T�I'�rwpJ�N Pit�(� , .� 90 INP�•'� Dry. Tda 3 -Aot s `S�ic'.ia /�l. ,�l,://.•!s �.. ,Of. f�. 'J_,Clex 3�� Ke.,Q: - •� '[1�•r•.S,�w� Panic /4rty#.t . .1'(J ,f,Q _ Q, 320 ^t'1►.oaov...Plo-.s+� — Lvt3-v-� �' 1 E F Imo.,.. AX -i iotc Mov%p too .fir Sit L r ' _•.ice" . A . CITY OF KENAI opt edp" 4 4" NOROMM TlLBPNON84� • � o MEMORANDUM s — TO: Kenai City Council FROM= Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECT: Landscaping Review: Lots 6,7,8, Blk 39 Thompson Parke S/D - One Stop Convenience Store - Roger Boyd DATE: April 2, 1986 City Manager Bill Brighton has asked that I submit a brief summary of events for you concerning the referenced commercial enterprise as of this date. w' Mr. Roger Boyd submitted a brief set of plans to Planning Specialist Loper on 3/11/86. The plan did not meet the requirements of KMC 14.25.030 and Mr. Boyd was contacted, samples shown, and he was asked to resubmit. Mr. A Boyd resubmitted the plans on 3/17/86, the plans still did not comply. Planning Specialist Loper took photographs of the area and coded the plane - to the photographs in an effort to supplement the second set of plans and - move the project ahead with no further holdups. - On 3/25/86 the Landscaping Review Board met in regular session and was met by a large group of people. One unidentified individual asked if this is the meeting where the 117-11 can be protested". Planning Specialist Loper explained the functions of the Board emphasizing that the Board had no _ juriediation over types of businesses or zoning or other matters. The individual stated he understood and turned to the members while I continued to set up for the meeting. I would approximate the attending public to be about 25 individuals. Before the Board meting began, Councilmen Hell, the Board, and I explained d- = to the assembled persons the same information related to the individual, again, that the Board had no jurisdiction over anything involving the business except the landscaping aspect. Many questions were asked, the �w T "One Stop Convenience Store - Boyd" Page 2 answers were that the zoning was correct for the type of business, siting of the building, parking, and the liquor license were all in order. In ehort, the business, in every way met City requirements.All factors did not fall within the duties of the Board and all questions were answered, however, the assemblage left the impression that they would pursue any avenue to prevent the business from being constructed. Since that time I have had no phone calla, no petition has been submitted, no further contact has been made from the persons attending and/or speaking at that meeting. The minutes of that meeting are attached for your information. SPEAKERS: Mr. & Mrs. Clancy Johnson Mr. & Mrs. Spence DeVito Mrs. Tweedy Mr. & Mrs. Dale Sandahl Mr. & Mrs. Von Phillips [IN .Y O '"afar. •_i f.,j=_-f;j I KENAI LANDSCAPING REVIEW BOARD March 259 1986 at 7:00 PM Kenai City Hall Lou Schilling, Chairman.. a CALL TO ORDER 8122 PM by Woody Cole = I. ROLL CALL Present: Cole, Evanson, Oberg, Schilling F . Absent: Caler, excused _ Also Present: Fred Braun and Bob Cohan of Old Town Committee -- - - -:- -- Planning Specialist Loper, Councilman Hall 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of None - last meeting a work session 9- 4. OLD BUSINESS •a. Review of Member's Draft Policy Statement b. Review of Draft Site Plan Ordinance - c. Review of Draft Townsite Ordinance , S. NEW BUSINESS S a , a. Landscaping Review: Lots 6,7,8, Bik 39 Thompson Park S/O - One Stop Convenience Store - Roger Boyd Mr. Roger Boyd told to bring in a legend of trees, define poles, grass, '94p over tanks may not be sufficient. Board Member Woody Cole suggested crushed rock. Spell out fence - kind and height. MOTION: r Board Member Oberg moved, seconded by Board Member Schilling that the plet.design plan be delayed for 14 days at which time Mr. Boyd will present detailed legend of trees, define poette (telephone poles)}, - street distances, fence kind and height for buffer tone. 2 VOTE: !here were no objections MOTION: --------: --:-�:----�:�- Board Member Oberg moved, seconded by Board Member Schilling to adjourn. 600 PH ^ y. - 3 .77 • LANDSCAPING REVIEW BOARD _� March 25, 1986 0 Page 2 6. BOARD QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT Landscaping Review Board Reconvened at 8:52 PM.'�'' :. a) MOTION: Board Member Schilling moved, seconded by Board Member Oberg to send the Yragui plan back for more detail. VOTE: r.:.._. . There were no objections � Planning Specialist Loper instructed to talk to him about the request. Postpone pa until the next meeting. Postpone Ab until the next meeting. Discussed the Townsite Zone Ordinance draft with Old Town Committee representatives. _ r-._ .\; •. .:a�:- MOTION: - Board Member Schilling moved, seconded by Board Member Oberg to adjourn to work session. 51 - 3 . _ - v" ''•`k� BSc L 6-3 CITY OF KENAI „Dll G-Al-,L-"TILIPM ato�o►wo �uu,u.naw► wen �` ee -M5 April 21 1986 MEMORANDUM T0: Kenai City Council - FROM: Dana Geretlauer, Administrative Assistan%t#q _ REs Requested extension of Candlelight Drive -_ I have attached to this memorandum a map showing the requested _.., extension of Candlelight Drive and how it effects the lease option area of the golf course. As you can see, it would pass, a� directly through the golf course. :_ tt .• Council passed an ordinance (870-83) on August 17t 1983 establishing a public use easement along Candlelight Drive Extension, subject to approval from appropriate agencies. A letter was received from the Department of Natural Resources on April 49 1984 which states "Merely upgrading and improving the existing and previously documented roadway right-of-way would not involve a conversion of use". As I understand the situation, this means that since this is a part of the dedicated parklands, the State is eayinq that we would not have to replace the land if as a roadway. The letter goes on to discuss the it is dedicated y use of a portion of the land for another roadway, Windsor Drive, .. _, which is located on the southern portion of the property. Also attached to this memo is a memorandum from Tim Rogers which - - he distributed at the time ordinance 870-83 wee passed. At the t=- end of his memorandum, he atatee that federal approval of the use as a roadway is required also, To my knowledge, this approval has not been requested nor received by the City. Attachments �V t j • • 1. r r� w n � t • Y � ti 32 9 Selma, not ' ... .w ':' gas•?� •. ... . yf. (ZI•%h} � .�••..:N •gin•,: � P+ r F.,- ...,7 It ?. r..I,,.,��.q�tt: •.� � .• MI r + t ± 0 � .• i= y VJ —n ••.ti. • ••. • • +q m /�.� irnsoft �• •'`� t }t i ! • -rl d r, • *i'. tt;-tarp •• .keftwo o Lot • Y Yy ytr+S:F� �f•�s i• AAA � • _ .. ". ...- •--•-----�.__., 'bi�HwrA�Af2� ♦ . L� QANDLELI AR. ,. At+ b'P441 IG1r4f YA,�YY�A.� f,fYA. tYAV • flp Y `+ fl gym+ � .•:at.,• �•v-,,.,'• - to ,' • ~ ��\ t ,�� is +d:tc•• r; •� i' 'AO R ' y • •1 `• •' � . iti� �� •. .. .. � 4 _ ram.. � Fi1 0 3 _ r t 1 •1 .�4--- - - ------- =s .er^. A.. .�..�`.azrr. �'-=---�'1, `: �•r,-- -. ate - _ .�---"`r r,•--.--r^;T - '-fir - —� - - . i) • : .cone ` ID .V u DIVISION OF PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION April 4, 1984 Re: 02-00020, Kenai Municipal Park 0 BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR 225A CORDOVA STREET ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99501 PHONE; 49071276.2653 Mr. Jeff Labahn, Land Manager City of Kenai 220 Fidalgo Street Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mr. Labahn: Thank you for your recent letters documenting the Candlelight and proposed Windsor Drive developments slated to pass through the 1979 land exchanged for converted portions of the Kenai Municipal Park. Our file contained right-of-way indications for Candlelight road as the land in question was platted in 1979 and initially accepted as replacement land. Merely upgrading and improving the existing and previously documented roadway right-of-way would not involve a conversion of use. However, if the proposed Windsor Drive encroached 30 ft. onto the southerly edge of the replacement' land in question, as is currently proposed, a conversion of use would occur with the land taken by the roadway requiring additional land replacement. A conversion of•use for the land taken for the Windsor Drive tight -of -way could be avoided if Windsor Drive were moved 30 ft. to the south, avoiding en- croachment on park land. The roadway configuration you propose could then be assumed wholly without a conversion of use requiring surveys, appraisals, and trapsfer of land titles. If you wish to pursue the proposed route for Windsor Drive, another request must be made indicating why the road cannot be relocated 30 ft. to the south, thereby avoiding park land impact altogether. If any in my staff can provide additional assistance, please contact them. Sincerely, Neil C. Johansen Director and State Liaison Officer ALASKA STATE PARKS -- Let's Put Them on the Hapf Ado - Suggested by% Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 670-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC USE EASEMENT ALONG CANDLELIGHT DRIVE. _ EXTENSION THROUGH CITY -OWNED LANDS. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a grant of access and maintenance along Candlelight Drive Extension through Lot l T' City -owned park and recreation lands described as Government 3, Section 3, T5N9 R11W9 SM, and WHEREAS, Candlelight Drive Extension is an existing roadway of one -quarter mile in length, is not constructed to City specifications and receives minimal City maintenance, and but not legal WHEREAS, said roadway provides the physical, 9 � ...... .. 'o ":" .:.:x access, to the adjacent 80 acre tract to the south, and _, • WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning 8 Zoning Commission recom- np, mended that a public use easement be granted along Candlelight Drive Extended at their meeting of May 259 1983, and WHEREAS, an.appropriate easement width of sixty feet would accommodate the existing roadway as wel: as present and future utility construction, and,_Y,.., WHEREAS, Kenai Municipal Code Sections 22.05.0109 22.05.020, and 22.05.050 require that a public use easement be established by __-:- -= ':'-151-2 the City Council by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that a sixty foot public use easement be es- tablished along Candlelight Drive Extension through City -owned land* described as Government Lot 3, Section 39 T5N, R11W, S.M-, „"_� subject to permission from appropriate federal agencies. A Furthermore, the City shall not aosume rosponalbility for the upgrading and maintenance of sold easement unless authorized by Council, nor costs of perfecting this easemont. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai, ALASKA, this 17th day of August, 1983. RONALU A. M LSTUN, MAYUR° ATTEST: 94 _Janet Ohe an, City Clark First Readings June 1, 1983 -=f Second Readings August 17, 1983 Effective Oates September 179 1991 CITY tut Kt11AI Vd (?apdal 4 4&"aff OP. O. OOK 310 KINAI. A:ASKA NSI I MIP140141 983 • 133S August 17, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: -File FRO m Rogers, City Attorney RE: -`: Right to Access on Candlelight Drive Extension A review of the low and purported authority presented by the Burnett's attorney's opinion dated August 12, 1983. None of the information presented overcomes the prohibition against acquiring property of a municipality. Alaska Statutes " • 29.73.030 provides as follows: ....... A home rule or general law municipality may not be divested of title to real property by adverse possession. Neither is it possible for a private landowner to prescribe against the United States, the City's predecessor in titles An occupant of land cannot hold adversely while he admits the title to be in the United States. Tyee Consol. Mining Co. v. Lengstedt, 126 F. 124. The 8urnetts' letter cites the City of Anchors a vs. Nesbett, 530 P.2d 1324, to suggest that the law or prescr pt ve easements applies to municipalities. The case does not support this conclusion. The case does not concern prescription against municipal or state property. The 8urnetts also cite Washburn vs. Esser, 511 P.2d 13879 to support the cone us on tnat a city, once it provides road maintenance, cannot later deny the use of a road. The Washburn case does not apply to cities, but rather" was a suit between two private land owners. They also rely on State Highway Commission vs. Dannevik, 447 P.2d 5109 as holding that the grant of a right -or -way is an easement which is a privilege to #Jse the land for highway purposes*, one DanT navik case concerns the state trying to gain prescription of tend for its own purposes. The case does cite - the definition that the grant of right -Of -way is an easement, but no prescription was awarded in they case. +'..J1xl.� • _ iF . .T. - 1 . W V o Second, they assume that. the City has dedicated Candlelight Drive Extension as a city street. Candlelight Drive Extension has never been dedicated as a street and there is no record of an easement given by the City to anyone. Third, the memo also assumes that the Gurnetts have no other access to their property. This is not true. The Burnette have access along a more circuitous route and, furthermore, they are charged with the knowledge that they did not have a permanent easement when they bought the property. Fourth, the Burnetts' predecessor in title, Helen Jones, was never given a written easement. This precludes the Burnette from asserting prescription by seven years of use. Raby v. Hill 11 Alaska 600. Finally, when the property was made a park in 1980 the following restriction was made by the State'Department of Natural Resources: he property has been dedicated to outdoor recreation through the land and water conservation fund and cannot be converted to other than public outdoor recreation use without the written approval of the Secretary of the nterior. TR/dg �. A _:`, O X U C-/ SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 1121-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $1539568 IN THE HIGHBUSH, ALIAK, SWIRES CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TO FINANCE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROJECTS AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS. WHEREAS, the City desires to raise the road grades and install Infiltration structures on East Aliak from the Creek to Swires, Hiyhbush, Bumblebee and on Swiree in the project (Alternate 48at an estimated coat of $148#5001 and, WHEREAS, the inspector has requested $25,548 as additional inspection costa under his existing contract; and, WHEREAS, $209480 is available in the Fund to be transferred to appropriate accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section It The following increase in estimated revenues and appropriations be made: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenuee: Appropriations of Capital Improvement Reserve 515�3..56!~ Increase Appropriations: Non -Departmental - Tranefers 81553 sb8 Hiahbush. Alisk, Swiree Capital Prolect —Increase Estimated Revenues: Transfer from General Fund Increase Appropriations: Inspection Construction 1 $ 469348 107 220 .1 _L n _Y V L J Section 2s The following transfers of monies be made t ` � within the ighbush, Aliek, Swires Capital Project Fund: From: Administration S 516 c Contingency 19,964 To: Construction 810.400. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this second day of April, 1966. _ TOM WAGONER, MAYOR ATTEST: Janet a an , City Clerk:. a First Reading: March 19, 1986 Second Readings April 2, 1966 Effective Dates April 2, 1986 .,:. Approved by Finances C9,d 3/13/66 2 t W March 149 1986 cot 1'sM Keith Karnali% Public Warks Dirac ''City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo St. Kenai,, AK 99611 Res 08312 - H.A.S. PROJECT F CONSULTING ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL/ OVIL I PLANNING 19571 E8343=3 Dear Keiths As requested at the council work session, I have Investigated the feasibility and costs for raising the grades an the H.A.S. project as described In Alternate No. 4 in my January 299 1996 letter to you. A recap In attached. As you and I have discussed, one of the major cost items included in my January 29, 1986 estimate was the cost of extending the storm drain an East. Alisk and Swires. The total cost for the storm drain extensions Is estimated to be *49,l0009 To reduce costs it would be possible to provide 4 Infiltration drains, 2 on East Aliak and 2 an Swires In lieu of the storm drain at an estimated cost of $149000 for a savings of *35,p000. The City has constructed Infiltration structures on other City street projects which are apparently operating without major problems, however, the storm drain would probably require less maintenance in the long run. In order to minimize the cost of raising the grades an these streets we have included the cost of constructing infiltration structures in lieu of extending the storm drain in this estimates I have spoken with the Contractor regarding these proposed changes and he has verbally agreed that the extra work can be accomplished at the bid unit prices, where applicable. Based on the amount of extra work relative to the original contract amount, I would recommend a 23 day contract extension to accom- plish these changes. 347 Keith Karnelit; March 14, 1986 - Page 2 I have broken the costs down as followse Option 4A - Raise grades an Altak from Highbush to Swires and an SwIrest including Infiltration structures in lieu of storm drain* Option 49 - Include raising grades an Allak from the crook to Highbush, and an Highbush and Bumblebee. This option requires Infiltration structures an Bumblebee and North Highbush. Option 4C Include raising grade an Allak from Linwood to the creek. s If you desire* council meeting to discuss this I will attend the I I will also need an amendment to the inspection contract to cover ..the costs outlined In my March 119 1986 letter to you an well as 1 —the costs included for designp thapectiong and surveying as 'described above. Some cost savings will be realized In the inspection portion since the Contractor will likely be working an road grades simultaneously with placing topaoilp etc. 0 N H.A.B. PROJECT PROPOSED BRACE CHANGES March 149 1986 COST RECAPITULATION • n 4A Construction Design $38,400 3,100 2970o r .". Inspection Surveying 29500 - - - -- - —= $46,700 _ 4A + 48 Construction $12797 + Design Inspection 694 00 8,900 461 Soo Surveying B,SOO $148, 500 4A +49 + 4C Construction $1459500 7,300 Design Inspection Surveying 109200 79500 aSOOG $1709500 ; _" V ' L I ' Nelson J &Assoafes CONSULT"GENGINEEMm.dSTRUCTURAL / CML /PLANNING �PQ. BCU IMB KENAI. ALAS" GM11 R1S ROALGO SUITE E04 (1309) P_83 3893 �r• - -y 'ir lam__ C�_ 6 _ January 29, 1986 !•, . wav loss ' Keith Kornel i s `d Public Works Director �pbUCsL:D�si„gdp¢t. A000T/0A/ A4„ ' City of Kenai ,• : ' 210 Fidalgo Street �f:� " /ivSj*jJr4OA� Kenai, Alaska 99611 C�it /6�IV A A. Rat H.A.S. PROJECT - INSPECTION , WORK Dear Keith: ;. With reference to Section 5.01.01 HM of the City of Kenai Contract for Inspection I would like direction from you as to the °> City's intentions regarding continuing inspection of this pro- Sect. ;I ® Our last billing brought us up to our budget limit and authorization to increase the to we request i not exceed limit in order to continue inspecting the project if the City desires. This is due to prolongation of the contract in excess of 20 percent. Sincerely, ~ Wm. J. Nelson 6 Associates W J. Nelson, P.E. - - rincipal WJN/bag r _ r `4v go. 4P• ~• Wm. d Nelson March II, 1986 Keith Kornelis Public Works Director City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street s + . 11 .r�1lt• E�IDINEERS ffMUCTURAL / CML / PLANhow 1 (80'710 Kenai, AK 99611 '.' ;,�`r • ti �. • !' Res N.A.S: PROJECT '« ' Dear Mr. Kornel i ss The original contract time was 120 calendar days. The revised ! contract time to date is 127 days. So far the Contractor has P used 134 calendar days. It is anticipated that approximately 16 days worth of work remain, depending on the Contractor's schedu- ling. This will make a total contract time extension of 150/120 2S%. We request an increase in the not -to -exceed limit in the amount.: of $239547. 25. This Is broken down as f of l ows a Redesign S29380.50 Extend water & sewer/East Bumblebee :1,073.00 Redesign - Restak i ng ' 2, 340.25 Extra Inspection - $79, 006 X 25Y. 199751.50 •�• . s." • $259547.25 141— "• ; Sincerely, Wm. J. Nelson & Associates ,:;�... Wm el son, P.E. Pr ncipal WJN/bag j, • Attachments ; •T ^"� ° iA � Ej�* .ft�► ..*'A=''•jJ�,.•F:��ri.�:«ill'::'•!.+!;}j�b1,i'�'/J�.�'.b�i�>t�'-Qfi.:�:•1��-iv+9Mt.i4tA���:As(ii�isif3ti� �'.e. ;;,•:T`'"'r , �V r H.A.S. PROJECT COST RE -CAP REDESIGN ENGINEER 8/2 7 Hrs. 8/5 5 Hrs. _ 8/6 2 Hrs. 8/7 2 Hrs. 16 Hrs. X $75.00 • $1,200.00 `� INSPECTOR 8/2 5 Hrs. 8/3 8/5 7 Hrs. 7 Hrs. O.T.- 41� 8/6 3 Hrs. hp 4P 15 Hrs. X $50.00 t 7 X4 61.50 619080.50 EAST BUMBLEBEE EXTENSION (SHEARER) INSPECTOR 8/6 2.5 Hrs. 8/12 6 Hrs. 8/13 7 Hrs. , 8/ 14 6 Hrs. 21.5 Hrs. X $50.00 $19075.00 REDESIGN - RESTAKINO 2 MAN PARTY 8/12 4 Hrs. :... = 8/13 4 Hrs. o 0/22 4 Hrs. 8/23 6.5 Hrs. 18.5 Hrs. X $126.50 $2,340.25 IA i "' ' :. 't .��'��..�. r.Is .i• ';i�••P.i.•;� 4:�+ ',}:r;:T••' ia�'it.;% ;� :n.4r i ..-.:•e't:i.):r •�s: .:t . . i t1i.i'.• ; :,;',:': -iol 1. {•: +' .• :+'Ny#�f CP« ly, }kb}i/ • k' :`r'vrrtf lrfYii� � �M - r ..-.lam Ab i -• .. F 135 CONSULTING ENONEERS STRUCTURAL CIVIL J* PLANNING 2115FIDALGO.SUM 204 1807w33-31n Is 4 OIL �t�WaKorno i, ?Ihl .. .1 ... . - - - MRWIFY, & 1 .0 '. i -�, , N•M U-4 !A"%'PUbl I C** Works'. 0 XinaO Ci.ty., of V to. i f4dalgo -S kenal'oJAK '.,9.96 Aj *1khed!l a u c t A -30 day time extension Per-:,. the 11AP a eCAr4ctb X ached memo.'':' a rd I ndi date that approximately 32 extra days of effort . . I are a red 'for' ;the Contractor. to complete work o#;.�the'-Cont�' Ailiviting.3% attached. * Mum. J ' . Nei leiki, li!�'Aiwbci at*%* t.. :; vir Nei 'iniilpall -PP m an .. b • R A WORK OUTSIDE OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT H.A.S. PROJECT - PROJECT 08512 A.. , 3. 4" S.S. SERVICE REPAIRS - 9 each: 2 days ; 4" S.S. SERVICE LATERAL CONNECTIONS - 3 eachs 1-1/5 days-.--.-�- 3/40 WATER SERVICE REPAIRS/EXTENSIONS - 12 eachs 3 days y 3/4" WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS - 4 eachs• 2 days INSTALL 54 LbF. 6" WATER MAIN (W. Bumblebee): 1 day 2 days INSTALL 350 L.F. 120 WATERMAIN (E. Aliak)s v' INSTALL (2) GATE VALVES (E. Aliak)s 1 day INSTALL F.H. ASSEMBLY (Force Account - E. Bumb l ebee) s 1 day INSTALL F.H. ASSEMBLY (Bid Item - W. Bumblebees 1 day LOWER 24" CMP STORM DRAIN & MANHOLES: 5 days 1 day REPLACE ES 36" 16 L.F. CMP CULVERT-(E. Altak)s ;. INSTALL 24" 40 L.F. CMP CULVERT - OVERFLOW (E. Aliak): 1/2 day INSTALL 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT 2 ea. 21 L.F.: 1/2 day - INSTALL 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT EXTENSIONS 2 each - 10 L.F.s 1/2 day - EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS ON E. Aliak 1400 c.y. & Filter Fabrics 1-1/2 days EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS ON SWIRES DR. 3000 cys 2 days ADD S.S. MH 10 & S.D. MH 5.s 2 days - { DIFFERENCE OF EXCAVATION QUANTITESe Original Designs Useable Materials -- 14,900 c.y. Unusable Materials - 139800 C.Y. -u. - Redesigns Useable Materials - 3,000 c.y. Unuseable Materials - 31,461 c.y. Type III Backf i l l - 0 TOTAL: 34,461 c. y. 2 days ,; _p. .LOWERED MH RIM ADJUSTMENTS ON E. ALTAK'- 7 Qach: 3 days t CITY OF KENAI P.O. BOX 680 • KENAI. ALASKA • PHONE 283.7535 FROM. DATE 4 REFERENCE Ewa= EIONED DATE =:F 1 • � ,_i'�F.s 1 1.•,i; . r - r• _ .. .. 1` a _ .. F CONSULTING ENC31NEIMM STRUCTURAL / CIVIL / PLwun& N P.C. Box logo KENAL ALASKA Bawl fiM5F4OAL00.SUITE e04 November 22, 19e5 JOBS City of Kenai vkt�X%... 210 Fidaigo St of wrai U Kenail AK 9961• %iota STATEMENT 08512 N.A.S. PROJECT Professional Services 10/11 through 11/22/85: PRINCIPAL/ENGINEER 44.25 hrs/75.00' $3,318.751 INSPECTOR 254 hra/50.00 (ST) A, "12,700. 0 77.5 hrs/61.50'(OT) .49766.25 .-.Jl ENGINEER I ... ... ZA 00 50.00 .29 hrs/50. g DRAFTING t 2 hro/35.00/ .70.00 4 T 1'..• f • 71 X1., 114, 4.75 hra/25.00 .-.• I.:` Y-!'! 4.. *118, 75/ A t :A • SURVEY PERSONNEL • 2-Man Crews 20.5 hrs/126.50 2,593.25"' 3 -Man Crews 10e0 hrs/176.5V '19765.00e Miscellaneous .....Expensess VEHICLE ak•40 days/40.00r 19 600. 00 LAB McLanes #3306 .. A 517.00--1 Total Services to/ii 11/22/85a $289899.00 Previously Billed: *589575.10Tj ,1 '. $87,474.10 Not -to -Exceed Limit: 079,006.00l Previously .Received: (589575.10),0 Balance Was 111010 Waft 7 M wae� -- F Suggested by: Administration C � CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 84-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR A FLOAT PLANE BASIN ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. WHEREAS, it has been determined through an engineering study by Quadra Engineering that the proposed City of Kenai Float Plane Basin cannot be accommodated within the existing City property limita; and, WHEREAS, privately owned land will be required to construct the basin as recommended in the Preliminary Heater Plan Update; end, WHEREAS, the private land most suitable as determined by Quedre Engineering for the float plane basin is an 80 acre (more or leas) parcel designated as the SE-1/2 of the SW-1/4 of Section 29, T6N, R11W9 Seward Meridian, ("Parcel 1", hereinafter); and, WHEREAS, the fair market value of this "Parcel 1" has been determined by an independent fee appraiser to be $12090001 end, WHEREAS, taking of "Parcel 1" is the most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA that the City Manager for the City of Kenai shall proceed to offer the owners of record of "Parcel 1" the sum of $12090009 contingent upon appropriation of funds by the E tr Co�un ilp-We fair compensation for the parcel. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the absence of a timely acceptance of the City's offer for "Parcel 1", the Legal Department of the City of Kenai is authorized to proceed with an action in condemnation to be filed in the Superior Court for the Third Judicial District in Kenai. PASSED BY THE•COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this second day of April, 1906. Tom Wagoner, Mayor ATTEST: 3enit WheIonq y er 3%28/bed by Finances cAe "Amil n � , CITY OF KI „Od Gap" � fr r ,4d&a . MORDAM 1(BNAi,A1mu ""I W&MONH40 ."" MEMORANDUM FROM: F Rogers, City Attorney City of Kenai T0: Councilmembers City of Kenai DATE: March 28, 1986 RE: Float Plane Basin Acquisition As the City moves toward the acquisition of land for the float plane basin, it may become necessary to "take" the land through eminent domain proceedings. Should the City proceed with condemnation, there are several choices which the City must make. These choices revolve on policy considerations and the Legal Department can affect a condemnation by following either of the two paths available. The Council needs to examine these choices and decide which policy it prefers to follow. Under the basic condemnation proceeding, the two paths available are known as the "slow take" and the "quick take." Under both of these procedures, the City initially files a complaint in condemnation. If the City desires a "quick take", the City also files a "declaration of taking" according to AS 09.55,420. Upon the filing of the declaration of taking and a deposit with the Court of the amount of the estimated compensation stated in the declaration, title to the land as specified in the declaration, vests in the City and is deemed taken for use at that time. The right of entry and possession under AS 9.55.450 is not immediate, but is allowed after a twenty -day waiting period in which the defendant has the time to file an objection to the declaration of the taking. The "quick take" method then is a fairly speedy method of acquiring the property and proceeding with the project. However, this procedure is not without its problems. 1 ." M r r Under the "quick take" provisions, once the declaration of taking to filed, the City is deemed to be the owner of the property and the only question remaining is what the compensation should be. While the City has an appraisal which sugggeets that the property in question here is worth approximately 51209000, that is not to say that later at trial a jury or a master (a judge specially appointed to sit on the case and decide the issue of compensation) may award an amount greatly exceeding $120#000. The City then pays whatever award the master or jury comes back with because the land has already been transferred to the City. Under the "slow take" procedure, the City files the complaint and with it a notice of lie pendene. The Lie Pendene Notice is recorded in the recorder's office and gives notice to anyone who may be interested in buying the property, that a condemnation action is being undertaken. Under this procedure, the property title does not vest in the City until after there has been a final judgment and entry onto the property cannot take place until a master appointed to decide the compensation issue sets a price on the property. The problem with this procedure is that there Is no given time line in which certain phases of the condemnation are to take place. It is conceivable that it could take up to one year or more to acquire the property under this procedure. This would, of course, severely delay any construction on the site. 0n the other hand, this procedure can be advantageous if the Master comes beck with a greater then anticipated award. If too great an amount of compensation is awarded by the Master, the City can walk away from the litigation end, at moot, end up owing costa. Again, I went to emphasize that this basically is a policy choice which the Council should make as to which procedure they would like to follow in this case. The Legal Department has already drafted documents to follow either procedure and is ready to file, given appropriate notice. TR/clf X Suggested by= Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION N0, 66-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, THAT SAID COUNCIL IS HEREBY AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE STATE DAY CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO AS 44.47.250-310. WHEREAS, AS 44.47.250-310 authorizes municipalities or other organizations to contract with the Stste for the implementation and administration of a program to assist in providing day care for the children of low and moderate income families, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai, Alaska, wishes to continue providing a Day Care Assistance Program in our community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that William J. Brighton, City Manager, is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Community and Regional Affairs on behalf of the City of Kenai for funds to implement and administer a program to assist in providing day care for children of low and moderate income families in our community. William J. Brighton, City Manager, is further authorized to act on behalf of the City of Kenai to accept any offer of funds from the Department and to execute a contract with the Department to implement and administer said program. William J. Brighton, City Manager, is also authorized to execute any subsequent amendments to said contract to provide for increases or decreases in the program funds committed to our community, based upon program needs in our community and those of other communities throughout the State. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 2nd day of April, 1986. ATTEST: Janet a en, city er Tom Wagoner, ayor FIN Y ' • or ALASKA SU MEFRE14 COWAN= DBPARTMWW OF REVENUR 550 W. 7th Avenue ALCaMCREVEWECONl1i0I,Oa4RD Anchorage, Alaska 99501 C E Janet Whelan, Clerk City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99621 ,ng2027 ?a,, . Dear Ms. Whelan: "'�'•r ` We are in receipt of the foil ag is tionts) toe tra�gfor liquor licease(s) within the Nt of lCena� You are being notified as required by As 04.11.520. CLUB LICENSE Peninsula Moose Lodge #1942; Peninsula Moose Lodge #1942; Mile 12.7 Kenai Spur Hwy.; 14AIL: P.O. Box 1902, Kenai, AK 99611. Transferred from: Same d/b/a; mail; owner; Old Location: Mile 11.7 Spur Hwy. . ► local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(10) may protest the approval of the application($) pursuant to AS O4.11.480 by furnishing the board dg,jd the applicant with a clear end concise written statement of reasons is support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. it a protest to filed* the board will not approve the application unless it finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. instead, in accordance with AS 04.11.S10(b), the board will notify the Applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the board and, it not satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal hearing in accordance with AS 44.62.330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT BEQUESTS A RUBINOI TUB !!U)RCIPALITY RUST COMB FORWARD AT THE RUBINO WITH EVIDENCE AND AROURBNT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. Under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for promises in a municipality where a zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless a variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. Under AS 04.11.420(b) municipslities met inform the board of zoning regulations or ordinances which prohibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages. it you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so in the proscribed manner and within the prescribed time. Please show proof of service upon the applicant. Under regulation IS AAC 104.14S(c) the board will grant a local governing body an extension of 30 days in which to protest an application it a request is filed in writing within the original 30-day period. It a aunicipal zoning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises and no variants of the regulation or ordinance hoe been approved, please so notify to and provide a certified copy of the regulation or ordinance if you have not previously done so. PitOTBST UNDER AS O4.11.480 AND TES PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION Of ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AS REQUIRED BY ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCB UNDER AS O4.11.420(a) An TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear that in mind in responding to this notice. Under AS O4.12.310, if applicable, a notice is also being provided to the appropriate community council within your.mnsicipality. 8 cerely, 4. tty aihoon Beco s b Licensing Supervisor (907) 277-8638 U. W IN W -_;j;_, r ♦ local governing body as defined under AS O4.21.080(lo) may protest the approval of the applicatioa(s) pursuant to AS O4.11.460 by furnishing the booed Mg. the applicant °;,tb a clear and concise written statement of reasons is support of a protest of the application within 30 days of receipt of this notice. If a protest is filed, the board will not approve the application Oslo$$ it finds that the protest is arbitraryl, capricious mad unreasonable. Instead* in accordance with AS 04.11.510(b), the board will notify the applicant that the application is denied for the reasons stated in the protest. The applicant is entitled to an informal conference with either the director or the based and, if Got satisfied by the informal conference, is entitled to a formal, bearing is accordance with AS 44.62-330-44.62.630. IF THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A HEARING, TUB MUNICIPALITY MUST COKE FORWARD AT TUB HEARING WM EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROTEST. under AS O4.11.420(a), the board may not issue a license or permit for premises in a municipality where a toning regulation or ordinance r.£ Prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, unless variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved. under AS 04.11.420(b) municipalities must inform the board of zoning regulations Of ordinances Web prohibit the sale or consumption of alcoholic Oeverag�s . If you wish to protest the application referenced above, please do so is - = the prescribed meaner and within the proscribed time. Please show proof Of service upon the applicant. Under regulation 15 AAC 104.14S(c) the 'y# �= board will grant a local governing body as a:tension of 30 days in which to protest an application if a request is filed is writing within the original 30-day period. If a municipal toning regulation or ordinance prohibits the sale or consuuption of alcoholic beverages at the proposed premises ad no variance of the regulation or ordinance has been approved, please so notify us mad provide a certitied copy of the regulation or ordinance it you have not previously done so. PROTEST MORE AS 04.11.480 AND TUB PROHIBITION OF SALE OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVBRAGBS AS REQUIRED BT ZONING REGULATION OR ORDINANCE UNDER �F AB 04.11.420(a) an TWO SEPARATE AND DISTINCT SUBJECTS. Please bear ttat iG mind is responding to this notice. Under AS O4.11.310, if applicable, - k` - A aoties is also being provided to the appropriate community council within your municipality. _ .= Reco s 6 Licensing Supervisor h (907) 277-8638 -. - - STATE or AUSU ... LICUM PR RIM OLOGD ? �• J o/ePtt-Pen�ns4le. Mee igg Pet�u9ls G �D ARp�s !yam G - WCATWO Mif IZ-23G VIEWAI evuug HIWAVO g _?s VISTUCiICOMI Dew a dstalled floor plea of your eureaat er propoead licensed promises OR the graph bolows show all entrances and *site, Sad all fl:tuna such se MBtelrso base coolers,• Iadlcate scab mad by IL after appropriate stat*mont. SCALS A_ scum 9j—V aqua" . 1 sq. ft. 1 square 2 sq. ft. outline the Arms to be designated for *aleg service and eom aaptlon of -_ _ -- aonsueptlom of alcoholic bas*ng*s to jlgg. `x .4' _.._�.._._..... ._ _ .._ _._.. FRONT ..�:... •.r«L..'� go 14 JUA Ice AACX W@ ..... "X ZM WALK r} .1 ...qrOhAt LLq •1�.-..--fir. FYr. - ~C h j . ;''L• tr. �T . KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH �-� BOX 650 • sOLOOTNA. ALASKA 99669 PHONE 282.4441 STAN THOMPSON MAYOR March 27 , 1966 Cn City of Kenai Atten: Janet Whelan 210 Fidalgo `'<110 L5 Kenai, AK 99611 RE: 1986 Liquor License Transfer Application for: Peninsula Moose Lodge 91942 Dear Janet: Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough has no recommendation for protest of the above noted liquor license based upon unpaid taxes. The sales tax and personal property tax accounts for this business are current at this time. Other tax accounts registered in the applicant's name are also current at this time. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Mc ee �V� Pamela Delinquent Acct. Techn. WE • 1 AGENDA KENAI NIJV ARCN OUNC1986 REGULAR- 7100PMEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL 1. Agenda Approval 2. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk(*) �therCouncildand o be routine and non-coonermotion�l Three will be no will be approved by .operate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which 08ee the item will be Cnsent a9 Partoofitheed In a General 0rdere. PRESENTeCB B. PERSON eon) (lime Limit Minutes 1. Carolyn Osborne_- Ballparks 2. Skip Bombard �- Kenaieple AutoPeninsula BoroughnQeLendfill 1. Skip C. PUBLIC HEARINGS oad Grant 1. ordinance Returningg ili7- to GeneraltFundRfrom Ito sd Projects 2. Res. 66-21 - Directing Cant Oletricl�on of the Eagle Rock Drive Paving 9. Substitute ek es. 8Pleoe PavIngtAssessmentuDistrict. Eagle ;. Ordinance 1119-66 - Appropriating S45,000 for Paving of Eagle Rock Drive. aforotitute paving ofdEagle Rookinance 9Drive endrTeri Place. S3,0 4. Res. 06-22 - Transfer of S29S26 in Gymnasium Capital Project for Enclosure of Rsmp- S. Rea. 86-2) " Transfer in 85/06 Water and Sewer Fund of S5,000 - Additional Overtime Pay. 6. Rea. 66-24 - Transfer In 85-86 General Fund of S5,000 Contract Repairs of Equipment. 7. Res. 86-25 - Transfer in 19e5-66 General fund Budget - $15,000 - Employys. Classification Study.en forosa. A66 y61 oTcanefersinnol Lake, Marine ServicesAgree Granite-Pt- a. Re.. Capital Pro eat fundlncre me7EstimatedtRevo ue/Approp- 9. Ordinance 1 21-86 "rot - Finance Additional Improvements In HAS Capitol Proj and Inspection Costs (Intro - a. $51,766 b. (Substitute No. 1) - $173,S68 c- (Substitute No.e d Adcp�lon68 d. Public Bearing e. Motion for Inspection Contract Amendment. 10. Repairs. !o SoutheentealKenaiSetviGesal St1P727 Fence p. MINUTES 1. angular Meeting, March S, 1986 (Not available from Clark's Office 3/17/86) . " L4 .. w _ •n ii.-±tA -44 - •, : • ..=ter t� � '��•s H ji E. CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2/10/86 - Kenai Central Higgh School letter regarding .educational support frog Fiee Chief Ivenoff and ilesson N. Williamson. iv x. 2/26/86 - Governor Sheffield letter regarding Alaska Conference of Meyors. 3. 3/5/66 - E. Nunnicke letter regarding T. Wagoner's appointment to Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board. 4. 3/7/06 - A. Marrou Letter regarding T. Nagener'e appointment to Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board. ` i� F. OLD BUSINESS G. NEW BUSINESS Y " 1. Bills to be Paid. Bills to be Ratified 2. Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 3. *Ordinance 1120-86 - Amend KMC Title 20 - Addition of Chapter 20.10 "Advisory Transportation Committee" and Repeal of KNC 11.10 "Advisory Harbor Commission". , 4. *Ordinance 1122-66 - Repeal A Re -Enact KMC 12.30 - "Alarm Systems" S. Discussion - Vacation of Right -of -Nay - Gusty Subd. 040 Add. /1 - Letter of Non -Objection. 6. Discussion - Application for Grant for Kenai Original Townsite Development. H. REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. City Attorney 3. Mayor " 4. City Clerk S. Finance Director 6. Planning 8 Zoning 7. Harbor Commission 8. Recreation Commission 9. Library Commission 1. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD �? ( nee Limit • Five Minutes Per Person) A03OURNMENT X F KENAI CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING, MINUTES MARCH 19, 1986 - 7100 PM kENA2 CITY HALL VICE MAYOR RAV MEASLES PRESIDING PLEDGE Of ALLEGIANCE A. ROLL CALL Presents Ray Measles, Chris Monfor, John Wise, Tom Ackerly, Sally Rollie Absents Jess Hall, Tom Wagoner (excused) A-1 Agenda Approval •. Vice Mayor Measles noted additional material "Be distributed this date for items C-2, C-4 and C-10. b. Vice Mayor Measles noted items C-11 6 C-12 are in the packet, but not listed on the agenda. Clerk Whalen explained, notice of public hosting on items C-11 6 C-12 were placed in the paperand c,.. c*created copies of the agenda Aave been pieced on the table for public use. " 0. Vice Mayor Hassles asked that items E-19 E-2, E-3, and E-A be added to the Consent Agenda. d. Vice Mayor Measles asked that item 0-2 the account be �} changed to "Repair 6 Maintenance Supplies" for Totem Equip. e. Vice Mayor Measles asked that item G-6, Old Town Gavel. ® Grant, be deleted. t. Vice Mayor Meaeleo asked that item 0-2, Johnny Jackson, be deleted. A-2 Consent Agenda ' Councilman Mies asked that item G-3 be deleted from the Consent Agenda. MOTION! < ' . . Councilmen Wine moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to �. -:r••: approve the Consent Agenda as amended. .ram Motion passed by unanimous consent. b s. B. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 9-1 Carolyn Osborne - Oallparke Carolyn Osborne, Box 993, Kenai- They have talked to the Roe. Dept., they still need mote bell parks for Little ' League. This is their first year for big league ball. They They may lose the dust bowl they have 16-1B year olds now. had said he would like to get Section 36, Mike Lucky, DEC Manager Or for use L �,,.•'1 would send written approval to City had..:c=:' (1 4 of Section 36. Recreation Director McGillivray .suggested usingthe bell fields for multi -use and have tournaments. it Is better to spend the money now for the than for corrections later. North Kenai has more guth, boll fields then Kenai h•e, they turn down tournaments - They could be used for Native Youth Olympics, volley bell, lifting, karats _'• youth bowling, archery, ping pang, weight and socoer - there could be leagues. She introduced Faye _ QMulholland, softball coach. - Faye Mulholland, Box 3967 Kenai. She lives in North Kenai, to heed for the soft bell. Age 13-13 girls: coach girls' went to Anchorage for • tournament. They have been •t a -:-- _- disodvent•ge hers beooue• they do slow pitch and it to fast pitch at the tournament. The regular season begins soon. Soldotne will have a week-long soft bell touraament for 7> p.• Lk KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1966 Page 2 age@ 11-13 in 3uly, they will have an estimated 5,000 people froa the western states. It Is the fleet time for Alaska, Kenai could have had a major team but they did not have the facility. They have one field snd have to share with 7 teams. They have no dug -auto, the field to clay and needs sore maintenance. She asked Council to find them a place to play. This to just the girls$ program, the boys tesme are progressing as feet as the girls. Aleeke can bid for the tournament every 3rd year, but it could go to any city in Alaska. The revenue from the tournaments Is great. There are 3 girls teams, she hopes to have 7 next year. Councilwoman Bailie asked, why can't the field behind the Ski No be used? Mee. Osborne replied, there are over 30 adult teame there now, it !o packed. Councilman Ackerly noted there will 2 mote available at the high school next yar. Me. Mulholland replied, they ere nice soft bell fields but they are back -to -beck. If a ball is hit, it would be in center field of the next field. There is no partition between end no gcaes. She suggested the Rea. Dept. people put more effort into grounds work. We need move adult fields. City Manager Brighton asked, what was sold at the Rae. Comm. meeting? Mrs. Osborne replied, Rea. Director McGillivray amid there was a problem at the old dump site, we did not have a permit from DEC. Mr. Brighton asked if the Roe. Comm. was going to make a recommendation to Council. Mrs. Osborne replied, not that she knew of. V.r. Brighton suggested waiting till we received notice from Mr. Lucky (DEC). Councilwoman Monfor suggested directing Administration contact Mr. Lucky to send the letter eo we can start this year. Council agreed to the auggeation. Councilwoman Bailie asked about the tournament. Mrs. Osborne said it would bring revenue into the area and would be good for the new community center. There could be speech contests and other functions. There are more facilities in North Kenai without a recreation director. Councilwoman Bailie suggested Mr. Brown (who could advise the City on obtaining tournaments) meet with Mr. McGillivray and Mrs. Osborne and discuss at the next Roo. Comm. mooting. Council agreed to the suggestion. B-3 Skip Bombard - Kenai Peninsula Borough - Landfill Tom Baedeker, Borough Attorney. He has been discuceing some issues with Atty. Rogers, and they wish to postpone action till the April 2, 1966 meeting. Vice Mayor Nogales asked if there was anyone from the public that wished to speak. There was no public comment. Atty. Rogers noted the item will be on the agenda when appropriate. C.PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ord. 1117-66 - Re -allocating Road Grant - $1,9171 Returning $15,296 to General fund from Road Projects. NOTIONS Councilwoman Nonfat moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bellies to adopt the ordinance. There we@ no public comment. n �w� _ Y, . XJ X KENAI CITY COUNCIL NARCH 19, 1906 Page 3 Notion passed unanimously by call call vote. C-2 Res. 66-21 - Directing Continuation of the Eagle Rook Dr. Paving Assessment Diet. a. Subet. Res. 66-21 - Directing Continuation of Eagle Rock/Tern Pl. Paving Assessment Diet. NOTION$ Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwomen Bailie, to adopt the resolution. City Manager Brighton explained, the difference between the 2 resolutions, the eubet. added the Pl. Public Works Director Kornelie reported, Council directed him to contact the people on Tern after Eagle Rock wee added. The results were 3 yea and 2 no votes. HOTION, Amendments Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Beiliep to amend the motion to substitute Res. 86-21, to include Tern Place. VOTE, Amendments Motion passed by unanimous consent. PUBLIC COMMENT$ as Al Poore, Kenai. He distributed a letter this date. He has property on Tern and is against adding Tern to the assessment district. There is something wrong when • pereon his age gets saddled with this. His total cost will be $14,500. The City has not done it anyplace else, whdo it here? He hee been here •lyng time and seen a lot of things happen, this Is not •cod thing. He Is 66 yeece old, 10years down the roads • long time to be saddled with this. Councilman Wise asked if he had trouble with the design. Mr. Ponce replied, yea, with the street. They are cunning water down the street. The engineering on Eagle Rock le poor. He has a lot more water than he had before. The City has proposed a sump near his well, that should not be allowed. b. Dwayne Quellette, Box 4349, Eagle Rook P1.9 Kensi. He hee lived mt Eagle Rock P1. 1? years. He wants it Paved. Eagle Rook is well used. Tern should be considered also, there are young children there. They will be drawn to a paved scoop this area probleMe# This would be a place to play that was not a main thoroughfare. c. Jim Dunn, 660 Tern Pl., Kenai. He supported the project when the questionnaire went out. He was dismayed that it was not counted. His we counted on E■gle Rock. He is boppy to see Tern put on. He has 3 children, they will be on Eagle Rook. They could slay an the oul do sea if it was paved. d. Curtis fisher, 640 Tern P1.9 Kenai. He is in favor of paving Tern. e. Joyce Treat, Eagle Rook Pl., Kenai. She has 3 Small ..,t':. s� jA D f .. � 0 - —77 - rcu children. Eagle Rook is veey busy. Paving Tern would be qcod. She suggested those Gppoeed to paving Tern r. could sell their property.-•= ...� 0. ` so. 4ar a KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1986 Page 4 f. Lee Borgen, Kenai. He asked it the price would be eat by per foot owned or would the people on Eagle Rock have to absorb the ddditional. Finance Director Brown replied, the cost of the project would be spread by equsre Postage of lots. g. Stanley Carsoni Lots 40 S & 61 Eagle Rock P1. Kenai. He testified when the City wanted to take Eagle Rock off (the assessment roll). He appreciates putting this on. It was estimated at $650 per lot, now it Is $1,000 per lot. The first notice said it would be over 10 years, now it says S years. He asked for clarification. Finance Director Brown explained, the let survey wee for several roads. With Eagle Rock only, the price went up. This is a uuggested amount. Council sets the interest rate and terms after the job to done. h. 3ack Lane, Kenai. He is in favor of paving Tern. His kids play on Eagle Rock, in summer they play on Tarr. Councilman Aokerly asked if there was an option on terms. Finance Director Brown explained, Council has the option at the and of the job. Council agreed to have it set up at a 10 year schedule. Councilwoman Monfor asked Public Works Director Kornelie about Mr. Posts's concerns. Hr. Kornelie said he will look at the drainage, at the public hearing they discussed putting in dry wells. They can put the high point book and Still put in a dry well. All drainage goes down hill now. Another option is an easement through Mr. Poore's back lot. Regarding the culverts, the city's normal policy is one drive and one oulvart. If additional are requested, they pay for them. The 2 lots Mr. Poore mentioned are vacant. City policy is not to do anything to vacant Iota. Councilman Aokerly eugge:ted, rolerding using the beck lot for drainage, the 2 culverts could be a trade -oft. Council agreed to the suggestion. Mr. Kornelie added, Mr. Poore will give the City 6 ft, for drainage. They will need 6 ft. from the neighbor also, Me. Kornelie her not contacted him yet. He will pursue this. VOTE, Main Motion as Amendeds Motion passed unanimously by roll cell vote. C-3 Ord. 1119-66 - Approp. $45,000 for Paving of Eagle Rook Dr. a. Subst. Ord. 1119-86 - Approp. $539000 for Paving Eagle Rock Or. 6 Tern P1. HOTIONS Councilmen Wise moved, seconded by Councilman Aokerly, to adopt the amendment to include Tern Pl. MOTION, Withdraws Councilmen Visa, with consent of seeond, withdrew his motion. MOTIONS Councilmen Wise moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfors to adopt the ordinance. 1*1 L tr , Y • nj , KENAI CITY COUNCIL NARCH 19, 1986 Page 3 NOTION, Amendments ° Councilmen Visa moved, seconded by Councilwoman Nonfor, to amend the ordinance to substitute ordinance 1119-06, to „ Include Tern P1. I VOTE, Amendments Notion passed by unanimous consent. : There was no public comment. VOTE. Noin Notion as Amendeds Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote. --•--- -- ----. C-4 Rea. 86-22 - Trenef. $2,326 - Gym Capital Project for Enclosure of Ramp NOTIONS - Councilwoman Monfor moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to adopt the resolution. - - There was no public comment. Councilmen Vise said 1) we owe this unspent money to the airport plus more for the lend we never bought. The longer we wait, the more it will coat. 2) There is a lobby in the _ gym used for a nursery that is not heated. If it is to be - used that way, we should look into that, it is more important. He questioned if this ie the best use of the - . funds. He asked If the foyer could be heated for a nursery. Portable electric heaters are a health ha:erd. Publia Mocha Director Kornelie sold, when the area was desiOned, It had a large heater from the gym. He did not know If that was enough, so he put in electric heat. It is a baseboard, not a portable. There are 2 sources of hest. Notion passed unanimously by roll call vote. C-3 Roe. 86-23 - Transfer Water d Sewer Fund - $99000 - -- Additional Overtime Pay NOTIONS w b Councilwoman Monfor movedp seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. EE+*V Public Works Director Kornelie explained, there was.* problem with the well house, furnace and lift station. Notion passed by unanimous consent. C-6 Res. 86-24 - Trenaf. General Fund - $5,000 - Contract - -: Repairs of Equipment NOTIONS Councilwoman Mentor moved, seconded by Councilwoman Beilia, to adopt the resolution. There was no public comment. -' W. Councilwoman Dellis asked if the shop could do this work. Public Work@ Director Kornelie replied no, the front and alignment for tha poAios oars, special tools for the 9669 'e 1 and turning brake dress. r 3F. Maw ,• te� a-t , F 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL NARCN 19, 1986 Page 6 Notion passed unanimously by call sell vote. C-7 Res. 86-25 - Trans?. General Fund Budget - $159000 Employee Classification Study NOTION# • d) Councilwomen Nonfat moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to adopt the resolution. There wee no public comment. Councilmen Miss sold he has read the contract and does not -------- ----� feel It is required. The work hoe to be done, but this is .r.i not appropriate or valid. VOTE (Peeeed) # `-- �s Yess Neseles, Nonfat, Ackerly, Gallia c Not Wise - C-7a Approval of Professional Services Agreement = - NOT I ON t :.........., Councilwoman Nonfat moved, seconded by Councilwomen Bailie, to approve the agreement. Ai" VOTE (Poseed)s- Voss Neseles, Nonfor, Ackerly, Bailie Not Miee C-8 Res. 86-26 - Transf., Lake, Marine, Granite Pt. Capital Project Fund - $6,947 - Inspection Services =' NOTION# - Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Nonfor, to adopt the resolution. a ;? There was no public comment. Councilmen Wise amid there wee no indication of verbal notice given at the time the work was done. Notice was served in the other case (Library work, Gintoli). There Is „ a difference between the two. Councilmen Ackerly said if -•-•:-,. one is paid both should be paid. But he did not feel either should be paid. VOTE (Failed)# Yess Monfot Not Meseles, Wise, Ackerly, Sallie Rp C-9 Ord. 1121-66 - Increase Rev/Appne - HAS Project - Finance Additional Improvesants, Inspection Costa a. inttoduotion - 01,768 .- b. Substitute 01 $133 960 at Substitute 02 - $175,568 ' d. Public Hearing 6 Adoption e. Notion for Inspection Contract Amendment Council asked for a re"Iew and reason for 4nd reading. Public Works Director Kcrnalle explained, item C-90 is raising the grade on Aliak from Highbush to Swiras and fatal Switoo above the grads we have now. That is an " ' addition'bsyond the contract. Also, 4 infiltration KENAI CITY COUNCIL 1° MARCH 19, 1966 f Page 7 t structures, they have storm drain now. Total addition is �. $46,000. Item C-9b is the some se above plus raising the grade from the creek down Alisk to Swires, raising the grade on Hlghbueh and Bumblebee. Cost, $140,000. Item C-9c Includes all reeds. Coat $170,000. He recommended C-9b. He requested the 2nd reading because the weather is getting better and he would like to start. C-9a was the original - proppcoal from Mr. Nelson. Councilman Wise asked if C-9b restores the streets to the contour before the project started. Mr. Kornelie replied, they will have drainage now. Councilman Wise asked, what about C-9c? Mr. Kornelie replied, it will restore to within a foot of the ov!ginel. The creek to Linwood would be included. He explained, C-9e ; and C-9b are still a large improvement over the existing. :s 1) Silt and mud have been removed from the rood. 2) Water and eewer lines and services have been Installed. 3) Storm - drain and ditch have been Installed to handle surface run-off. Councilman Wise asked, what is the coat of the a whole proposal? Mr. Kornelie replied, about $8000000. Bill Nelson, Engineer. The original construction cost Is $768,000. Change orders to date for water line Improvements are abou! 530,000. The other changes are $20,000. There to about $022,000 under contract. He expects to under -run about $20,000. The reason he set up the proposal with priorities was he thought C-go wee most important, C-9b wee next and C-9c wee least. Councilman Wise asked if the people In the area had reviewed title, answer - no. Vice Mayor Measles granted a recess for review. NOTIONt Councilmen Miss moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, to introduce Ord. 1121-96, item C-96. U PUBLIC COMMENTt ` a• Derby Howell, Kenai. He did not know this was coming = up. He was here to report to the neighbors. m, Councilman Wise asked Mr. Howell if he had any :- - problem. Mr. Howoll replied, he would have a problem Q with the ditches. But Mr. Nelson had told him he would bring up the ditches accordingly. _. Bill Nelson, Engineer. He will have a flat bottom on the ditch Instead of a "V" in the ditch. Councilmen Ackerly noted at the work session C-9a was recommended. =� Now we are adding mere. Mr. Nelson explained, C-91s v' would change the drainage direction. He did not feel E C-9e was necessary.6,ij -- - _ — — -- MOTION, Amendments Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, r;tr to amend the motion with substitute 01 (C-9b) at $153,960. VOTE, Amendments Motion passed by unanimous consent. ;»_ -• 'r' Councilwoman Sallie asked about the time frame. Mr. Nelson =ate; ::4•�;s.. ® replied, it will be done this summer. The contractor figured about 3 weeks. VOTE, Hain Motion as Amendedt ' Motion passed by unanimous consent. _ 't.`•e� ter. t�r•1: -.ii. t tt rj.3-r Y� 1 '+ KENAI CITY COUNCIL ;-tom: - MARCH 19, 1986 Page 8 -',} - C-9d 8 C-get City Manager Brighton sold he did not feel the 2nd readingg was necessary this dote. Mr. Kornelle explained, i! wao to .-..r . get the ball rolling. They have to see! with the contractor because the job has been changed. Material will have to e ordered. Council agreed to have 2nd reading at the April 2 meeting. C-10 Res. 66-27 - Award of Airport Fence Repair to Southoentral Services - $13,727 3 MOTIONt Councilman Wise moved, seconded by Councilmen Ackerly, to adopt the resolution. MOTION, Amendments Councilwoman Bailie moved, seconded by Councilwomen Monfort to emend the motion by substitute Rea. 86-27,dietributed this date. VOTE, Amendments •`_> -d:. „ Notion reseed by unanimous consent. - Public Works Director Kornelis noted the explanation for the substitute was in the attached memo. Atty. Rogers added the it facts were not as represented. Not having a contractors . -. license is not important, the bonding to. He is not se ing -•- the person ie not cesponeive9 but they were in error. The difference between bide to $250. PUBLIC COMMENTS Tim Twohy9 Southcentrel Service. When he talked to Engineer La� -... - _L —#_ Shot he said he did not have a contractor s license. He called Juneau, it is at Insurance Cache waiting for a signature. VOTE, Main Notion as Amended (Poseed) s Yost Neaelee, Monfort Bailie Not Mice, Ackeely MINUTES 0-1 Regular Meeting, 3-9-86 Approved by Consent Agenda. E. CORRESPONDENCE- ±' r E-1 KCH89 Educational Support from Firs Chief Ivanoff a Fireman Williamson - -- „:E-2 Gov. Sheffield, Alaska Conference of Nayora E•3 AK Natural Resoueoee Coma. Wunnicks, Mayor Wagoner Y Appointment, Kenai River Special Monaqesent Area Adv. Board =. E-4 Rep. Marron, Mayor Wagoner Appointment, Kenai River Special • ^_ ., Management Area Adv. Board ~ - Approved by Consent Agenda �+ y OLD BUSINESS — : None = •„cs• V. oa a _ ,y}y o mac, 6A 9, .. - Ai l : 0 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1986 Page 9 G. NEW BUSINESS G-1 sills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTIONS Councilwoman Mentor moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bailie, " to approve the bills es submitted. Councilman Wise caked if we had received any income from the assessment district. Answer - no. Motion passed by unanimous consent. 0-2 Requisitions Exceeding $1,000 MOTIONS Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Councilwoman Bellies to approve the requisitions so submitted. Public Works Director Kornelis explained, this is for the old ambulance. Motion passed by unanimous consent. G-7 Ord. 1120-66 - Amend KMC - Addition of Advisory Transportation Commiaeion and Repeal of Advisory Harbor Commiaeion HOTIONt Councilmen Ackerly moved, seconded by Counoilwciaon Monfor, T.....o to introduce the ordinance. Councilmen Vies said he objected to joining the Harbor and Airport Commissions. We ere eliminating the functions of P&Z, Administration and Council. - VOTE (failed)t Vest Ackerly, Bailie Not Nogales, Monfor, Wiee _ 0-4 Ord. 1122-96 - Repeal & Re-enecting KMC, Alarm Systems Approved by Consent Agenda. G-i Discussion - Vacation of Right -of -Way - Gusty S/O Addtn. /1 - Letter of Non -Objection MOTIONS Councilmen Wiee moved, seconded by Councilwoman Monfort to - w---='- - - send of letter of non -objection. Motion pegged by unonimous.coneent. H. REPORTS o a H-1 City Manager .'4; City Manager Brighton @poke. -^ w a. He attended Natl. League of Cities in Washington O.C. § last week. They are protesting the out -books on finances. He is on the Small Cities Economic:_ low cost' Development Committee, their concerns fire iicavalevnue8herino k:e.iiRetcommittees. It is the NESENSEEFZZ r KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1986 Page 10 National League of Mice 11 priority to retain. In many small oltiea, that is the only Federal money they receive. He spoke to Rep- Young, he supports Federal Revenue Sharing. Son. Stevens and Murkoweki are noncommittal. The Notional League of Cities urges 611 municipalities and elected officials to send letters to all representatives. Every State had meetings with their delegates. After the meetings, he felt convinced it will stay in some form, this to better than eliminating it. b. He had a visit from a representative of the nursing home in Soldotne. Kenai appropriated $14,000 last year for the people of Kenai. The representative said she wee requesting the same for this year. He reminded her they had said they would not b^ back and euggo ted she had the right to come to Couno.tt but it would be his recommendation not to pay. Frao cut -books on Federal, State and Borough, we do not reslize the amount of the crunch. We have to consider tha^e requests. H-2 Attorney None H-3 Mayor None H-4 Clerk Clerk Whelan spoke. a. She attended the Clerk's Seminar March 9 to 14. The primary concerns are Fedl. Voting Righte Act Preclearance and amendments to Tills 29. :ha will have a report for the April 2 meeting. b. She reminded Council of the meeting with Lt. Gov. McAlpine on April 3. c. She reminded Council of the teleconference on March 20 regarding Hazardous Wastes. d. She reminded Council of the hearing on the proposed float plane basin and the airport comprehensive plan scheduled for March 20. H-S Finance Director Councilman Aokerly noted the letters in the packet for State legislators and Natl. legislators were very grad. Finance Director Brown explained they were sent to all representatives and the Municipal League. H-6 Planning 6 Zoning None H-7 Harbor Commission None H-B Recreation Commission None 0 0 pp KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 199 1906 a E Page 11 H-9 Library Commission Library Commission Chairmen Sworner. They will have the April Z7, 2�00 PM. dedication for the addition on I. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD e. Father Tergonekyt Russian Orthodox Church. He asked Study - would be discussed. . when item 6.6 - Old Town it deleted and would Fi+ dale ' becpleoedtonetheeOgenASSetea laterd date. b. Councilman Nice. Regarding Info 17, Float Plane Basin. awarded the i Ne have not appropriated the money or why? Airport Manegee Ernst Msweeet +' oontreot, liastine '- have not gone to design because pceepp after the March ZO public hearing. }� book to be submitted It is required. He talked to Jim Perham, FAA, who felt, the importance of public h0ecinge on environmental to make Suee oP the finding of no Y4 to assessments significant impact. Mr. Ernst will meet Meech "FONSI" (Finding of No Significant determine if it is a ile Impact). Then he will resubmit the Mepoouldigo-outhfor 60 days), they site reviewing (about RFP for design. He noted we are talking about $1769DDD Nincet ° T for engineering end design, according to the If we do not have all the Coethell 8 Sri n study. letters in from Federal agencies and if the public the float plane basin, hearing shows people to not went be stuck with a bill for deeign, should FAA we would see tit not to approve. Me will put the pteapplication He received s letter from in at the end of the month. the Borough, they ace in fevoc of alternate #I. There Me have the r aaortas. has been no objection from any g Corthell 6 Bryson study and the M. Tauried Nance, I etudyf if FAA approves, the funds can be recouped.. if we proceed in a normal course ' Councilmen Wise said and wait we will not introduce funding ordinance for for RFP, and - design till we got approval beck, then go We will not Start design contract 3� �•. advertise i0 deye. till Oct. He suggested making the apptoptistion and not award ask for RFP'e with the proviso that we would I till approval by FAA. Council look no action." ._ b. Councilwomen Nonfat. Regarding the Senior Care Center. Director, it is going She complimented the Program ;a o.. well. Of Councilwomen Nonfat- She asked if we have storm drains Public Works Dicuctot Koenelis ?.,,..... ... -6 _,, -.... dumping into the river. replied, it is illegal to dump into the sewer system. to Breek-up run-off goes to natural drain eraser some have a mein storm drain on Redoubt to the creeks. Ns Inlet. Nothing goes into the river- Councilman Wise Methodist Church and down �. i noted there is one nest the by Old Town. Mc. Kocnelle explained, the Old Town one Nere le private. Councilwoman Monfot asked if we going difficulties Soldotne host with storm to have the drains going into the river. Vice Msyot Measles noted let store drains dump into the y DEC says they omnnat river. Ne may have to have a permit. Mr. Ke ivecsettlelethe In a oursndo not,tthey yinto ten Sddedoldoi[ne d. Councilwoman Beilie. Regerding the Council on Aging. is 6 days aiw ekhutheralitetSgsaniors,dSnmoes�eretwanq� 4 ;s .. L f K ]] V - • O V� F KENAI CITY COUNCIL MARCH 19, 1986 Page 12 Anchorage has 169 This does prolong the move twanlneertunggon.edmillee have noticed a change. Senior Citizen Coordinator Porter has reported a 5% out in senior center funds. She will apply for Soldotne satellite for meals and the eenlore will be trying to have money -making projects. e. Councilwomen Bailie. The Hospital Board will most 3-24. There will be a long-range planning meeting 4-3. f. Councilwoman Bailie. Mildwood Advisory Board will have e meeting 4-3. g. Councilwoman Bailie. She requested a procedure for bid documents for limiting the time pest substantial aomplation. Public Works Director Kornelie replied we have that now in the architectural portion. He could put the same thing into roads. h. Councilman Ackerly. Regarding the planning calendar (Info 01). Will there be an ordinance? Public Works Director Kornelia replied, it Is under $1,000 and can be ordered. A030URNHENT t Meeting adjourned at 905 PM. Janet Whelan City Clerk - --, _- - ' r � COMMITTEES: ;•ItU � ._. .........— Kenal Sterltns 0ammhca on Communhy usd ReOontlAtlalls ` Soldosns Anehef Potu Commtnce on Transportation k f �31 123 Homer Pon GrahamSpeeblConmiltaanOilandGas ...�ti / �� kr Seldevia Easim say Sp4eid Committee an Flshatks / Kachemak Nikolu"k FUma Suk-commhue on Fish and Game u~` ct^ r%- L� WWI` HOW Cove ti [: Nlnikhik ClamQukh , Andre r_ ItepteeelllaUve e�', w t� j February 28, 1986 Mayor Tom Wagoner _ City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo _ Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Toms �} Regarding keeping school bond interest within the; ® municipality (which I support), enclosed are these documents y - a) My memo to Tam Cook, Feb. 19, 1986, requesting a legal opinion on validity of DOE's regulation (4AAC31.058) _. versus AS14.11.100(k). b) Opinion in reply by Joyce James, Feb. 26, 1966 (2 pages): ;} ; c) Letter to Ben. Fahrenkamp from Aset. A.G. Wm. F. '" Cummings, Feb. 20, 1986 (2 pages) --referred to in James' P' opinions t, d) 4AAC31.058 a) A814.11.100(k) • In essence, Counsel James believes "it would (not) be an open-and-shut cases but... the regulation would be upheld" if challenged in court. -.- - - It was, as you cem probably guess, my original idea that perhaps 4AAC31.058 conflicts enough with A614.11.100' (k) to make the regulation illegal. This appears not to be the case. ,6-. ._. ,Dueisg BealOns P.O. f3ox i/, luaetq, Meeks 993f I: (907! 16!•1l19 Dlaing tatalau Bo_ x 1173, Hornet, Alab �601. t90�%1231a100 - .�,. .Q';•_�;�: • Zn- 17 -- ., sA�ea:.�uu ru:.:..r.... .. , .,-t.✓i.;c ..a. ., ,-,,,ix.: .Y.i�3ti,11iY3.:s'.:.vs:ta5- t�:ifaxriakJ.• 4•.. .t� iR:,i'• u J u i �u I Anyone who wishes can test the regulation in court. Meanwhile. we are back to "square one". If Son. Paul Fischer's BB351 makes it to the House (expected within a week or two), I will certainly support it. At the present time, BB351 seems our only real chance to keep school bond Interest at home. Best regards, _ Andre Marrou Representative AVM/lc _._....... enc. wy Q{ O� 1'+ `-K7 :1101-6����tilYi �i:lN�i-iKiY1"3KF It. ': K•Ji:t%=.1' •�•'.. _::Ll�4.i/tii.C..�..+wi%.!:ilil;.y�1+1��3Lj_u°1L���� ,ai.�.1M!��:��e�r�c• .•.-fl.!�� _.r. t , February 19, 1986 To: Tam Cook, Legal Services Fromt Andre Marrou, Representative Subjects School Bond Regulations Would you please give us your opinion of the legality of, and merit oft the interpretation of legislative intent regarding AS 14.11.100(k) and the resultant regulations 4 AAC 31.58. Is there a lot of latitude on how these regulations could of be written? Is it necessary for the State to claim the short term interest on school construction bonds in order to be within the confines of the law or, is this just the opinion of the AG's office? Would this be an open and shut case if it were challenged in court? o • • O �- ,._'i`Y'.'- .—�1:, L=�.'fi..it..�WS•=�'•w'��6�y ify'Uti'.,'l+tR4VL�:lin..li::�I`.. ,i.::N' Y::YKRe Ili.L+.i1�SS�1{t_�s (L 1 .0 POUCH V • STATE CAPITOL JUNEAU. ALASKA 99811 ��JJ I.a III,EE v (n1 907-465.3800 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS AGENCY MEMORANDUM February 28. 1986 SUBJECTt School construction bond regulations (Work Order No. 14-1938) T0: Representative Marrou Attn: Jack FROM: Joyce James Legislative sel You requested an opinion on school bond regulation 4 AAC 31.058 and wanted to know how much latitude an agency has in drafting regulations. An agency charged with provid- ing regulations to administer a program such as the direc- tive in AS 14.11.100(b), must necessarRy interpret the statutes in order to do so. Agency interpretations of a statute are entitled to great deference and will be upheld so tong as they are reasonable. Kunaknana v. Clark. 742 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1984). While there is a reasonable argument that the regulation is inconsistent with the language of AS 14.11.100(a)(5). it is my opinion that there iw also a reasonable interpretation of AS 14.11.100(k) to support the regulation. For a court to uphold an agency action, the agency's interpretation of a statute need not be found to be the only reasonable interpretation, nor the interppretation a court would reach if faced with the question= rather it need only be a reasonable interpretation. Marathon Oil Co. v. U.S., 604 F. Supp. 1375 (D. Alaska 1985). You also asked us to analyze an AG's opinion. I am unaware of an AG's opinion concluding the state must claim short-term interest on school construction bonds in order to be within the confines of the law. I have seen a letter by Assistant Attorney General William F. Cummings dated February 20, 1986 that states the intent of the rovisions of AS 14.11.100 are that than state reimburse up o 802 of the costs of approved school construction proj- ects, and that if the bond interest is used to reduce the �} ' � i -_ :;. A i1 r• N ICJ Representative Andre Marrou Page 2 February 28, 1986 municipality's share of the outstanding debt obligation but not the state's share* then the state will pay more than 802. If this interpretation of the provisions of AS 14.11.100 were challenged in court I do not think that it would be an open-and-shut case. The accuracy of that interpretation does not affect the validity of the regulation however. If the regulation were challenged in court I don't think it would be an open-and-shut case, but I do think the regulation would be upheld. An administrative regulation is accorded a presump- tion of validity and the challenger of a regulation bears a substantial burden in demonstrating its invalidity. Alaska Intern. Industries Inc. v. Musarra 602 P.2d 1240 (A a-e- cam- , Ocate v. 9LueKa, ova r.2d 174 (Alaska App. 1985). Given the deference s own to agency interpretations of stat- utes, and that this interpretation is a reasonable one in light of the legislative history, it is my opinion that the regulation would be found valid. If you would like more information, or if 1 can help in any other way, please advise. JJsmkr m3/099 ,u:-:�...,tr' ��'• ;.� _!.,=i`.;_r,..y.+e:'s-'c' ..��Y��.fir+1W i�:� .li � .--: a ' 'iti., .. �1�---�� -..:ay.+�71�it�ii;Ai.•✓7.Ic:-.1...;�ti_�.+.tr�:=xti�...t exi+. It `?k- U n FED 21 13D BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR ' REPLY 110. ® DBPART.ME T OR LAW 01021 with AVENUE ;n - SA►re 200 o ANCMORpOE. ALASKA 99501 OFFICE OF MEATTORNEVGENERAL PNONS, (907) V84860 e 0 ht NATIONAL CENTER i 100 CIIEMMAN or. E Februar 20, 1986 FAIRS Aoo y FAIREANKF, ALASKA 99701 j PHONE: 1907/ 462-IM Y3 P.G. BOX K - JANEAU. ALASKA 09011 PHONE, (907) 465-260 .� 465-3603 The Honorable Bettye Fahrenkamp' Alaska State Senate P.O. Box V- ' Juneau, AK 99811 All Re: SB 351 ' AS 14.11.100 (k) ° g Dear Senator Fahrerakamp: Please excuse my delay in responding to your letter of ti February 8, 1986. 1 did not receive it until February 18. You have inquired regarding the interpretation given to - - AS 14.11.100(k) which results in the reduction of the amount reimbursed for debt retirement by the amount of interest earned ' on bond proceeds which is applied to the costs of the project, the payment of accrued interest, bond redemption, or the costs of . the bond sale, except in the case of cost overruns which are - unforeaseable or unavoidable under prudent management. This interpretation has been placed in regulations found at 4 AAC 131.058. These regguulations are the result of construing the pp rovisions of AS 14.11.100(k) as well as other provisions of AS 14.11.100. , °. AS 14.11.100 (k) requires municipalities to spend the Interest earned on proceeds of bond sales for specific items of expense relating to the construction of a school facility. The repayment of all or a portion of these items of expense has the practical effect of reducing the amount of money owed on the debt obligations. AS 14.11.100 (a )5) (A) provides that the state will rein- burse up to 80 percent of the costs of school construction for<- . rejects apppproved by the Department of Education. Under AS 4.11.1- M interest money may only be spent in ways which reduce debt obligations the outstanding arising from the costs of`• d }Y,_ _ . .• L' - a -:..,:try " ..ca-�[iww."4, ••.. s. M..a at.l»aAiKl �UL•9faklk'llfSiS«Y.iii%�a:�yi5�f..�5�+:iK►IMi.Li�.iwili� '•: n - 0 ,; _ _ 1 ip Honorable Bettye Fahrerkamp Alaska State Senate February 20, 1986 Page 2 school construction, obligations which will be reimbursed by.the state* in our interpretation of the provisions of AS 14.11.200, if there is no reduction of the amount the state will reimburse by the amount of the interest earned on bond proceeds, the state will pay more than SQ percent of the outstanding debt obligations. This result is not intended by the statute as evidenced by its language. Sincerely yours, HAROLD M. BROWN ATTORNEY GENERAL 001, • OU-1 By William F. Cummings Assistant Attorney General WFC: pray LM u • • - � � � gyp. Y LL•3.{ 4� 'Ij�A.`,y�` ', }i.! • f '-_i}:,..' :1i `.`�...'L� . _ e t l,.Paz. '- • ,t: 't:7, `•j-:•:: ..IL IX4 ; u: utl.: t" ',;.ww.ASt�fG3ilIr�`i:'.YAW+.%�c.vuitrWaei�.fl:r=m�•J(S.I�f��aa�w.�� iiw ':. ._ .. �. •" � � _ , tJ . its ��` •Y a a k .. .. degi.ater • EDUCATION 4 AAC 31.058 4 AAC 31.090 (d) In the event that the department denies or limits reim- bursement of costss the district may appeal the decision in d with the rovisions of 4 AAC 40.020 through 4 AAC accov p Eff. / / 050/ Reg. Authority: AS 14.07.060 14.11.100 �^ 4 AAC 31.058. USE OF INTEREST EARNED ON BOND PROCEEDS. (a) Interest on proceeds of bonds for which debt retirement under AS 14.11.100 is sought may only be used to: (1) pay the costs of the projects (2) pay accrued interest on the bond issuer r: (3) redeem all or part of the bonds or (4) pay the costs of the bond sale. _. (b) If the money earned as interest on the proceeds of bonds is devoted to thecosts of the llpro reduced n the amount for _ which debt retirement is �• t. (a) If the money earned as interest on the proceeds of ' bonds is used to pay tscrofethenbondasales thenredeem all theeamount art forthe the cost �'- bonds, or pay 1. — which debt retirement is allowed will be reduced by that amount. V, (d) The accounts in which the proceeds of bonds are placed are subject to under the provisions of 4 AAC 31.O57 and the . T district shall report, on forms prescribed by the department- the use to which the cu+ney is put. (F.f. f . / / Re8 • ) authority: AS 14.07.060 3 AS 14.11.100 4 AAC 31.090(10) is proposed for adoption as follows: 4 AAC 31.090. DEFXVITIONS. " means for the purposes of debt retire- (10) "facility �:... , sent mean n (A) the buildings and grounds need to house and t, I support the educational programs or lr . Y 14.11.100 ALASKA STATUTES SUPPLEMENT 0 14.11.100 (3) payments may not be made for costa that are incurred under a contract alter the contract has been released. q) The state may not allocate money to a municipality for a school construction project under (a)(5) of this section unless the municipal- ity complies with the requirements of (1) — (4) of this subsection and the project is approved by the commissioner before the local vote on the bond issue for the project. In approving a Project under this subsection, the commissioner shall require (1) the municipality to include on the ballot for the bond issue the t estimated total cost of each project including estimated annual operation and maintenance costs and the estimated amounts that will be paid by the state and by the municipality; (2) that the bonds may not be refunded unless the annual debt service on the refunding issue is not greater than the annual debt • ; service on the original issue; (3) that the bonds must be repaid in approximately equal annual or approximate equal debt service payments over principal PaymentsPP a period of at least 10 years; (4) the municipality to demonstrate need for the project by estab. lashing that the school district has (A) projected long-term student enrollment that indicates the district has inadequate facilities to meet present or projected enroll- ment; or (B) facilities that require repair or replacement in order to meet it health and safety laws or regulations or building codes. (k) An amount equal to the interest earned on the I investment be f the proceeds of bonds issued for a school construction project by the municipality to (1) Pay the costa of the project; 4 (2) pay accrued interest on the bond issue; (S) redeem all or part of the bonds; or .I (4) pay the costs of issuing the bonds. 0 1 ch 249 SLA 1970; am 1 ch 93 SLA 1971; am 0 2 ch 137 SLA 1972; am 0 1 ch 28 SLA 1973; am 147 ch 127 SLA 1974; am H I — 3 ch 120 SLA 1977; sin H 12,17 ch ! m1982; am H I —3 8 ch 82 SLA 83; am 04 h 8 SLA 1984; m0 8 ch 78 SLA 1985) iltevisor's notes. — Enacted as A8 thar hlc for n theorgan zed bury language oorage of 48.18.100. Renumberedrent-In 1988. subsection (a), substituted "the municipal• Cron refeeenoes. —For present pro- i vislow of former subsection Ig) of this ItyIllt a bo and(0).or end t311Al and 1 In Pm - section, see AS 14.11.135(3). graphs ppee smZgeog eadmen euubstittuted i municipality cents nututed dw IntrtroduMtory „langu� of ' 18 14.11.102 he (2) and r" 800AMUS alsoo 199, ofsubud►on (b), spoucaa tb Or umult sK41, ta.ette+e "uP er .. 4 �wotere of th• siy 1,190 in (A). _ V' 1j19W In t81 c• 051 .,. of e). and added rise added paragrap on mean jieW and Oast OPT The low end ,go, in <. h (81 of su ee andsuubsti►� sn6sactnn (h) In tl ... _ See. 14.11.10:. evaluate project requested by sct in AS 14.11.01 14.11.100 must no later than 0 which the reque ., we@** data. CA 1985 pprroovides: iul 10, e noise. - s lA im that " Sea 14,11.1( eccoualt The 1 ,"Hahed, Tk under AS 14.1 school districts troe," approt ; .. commenced aft - other indebtedt 1978) �.. Revieove note U.18.106. Kellum! . `t . f CA DEPARTMENT OR ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OP ADM/ NISTRATI VB SBRV/CBS March 12, 1986 The Honorable Tom Wagoner Mayor of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, AK 99611 E — g elu SNEFRIElD, GOVERNOR fuciv0(MS 0208) AWEAU,/NONE: (907) 465-2277 Dear Mayor Wagoner: The Department of Administration administers the Municipal Aid Program under the direction of AS 37.06.315 which states in part that: An appropriation or allocation for a grant to a municipality for construction of a public facility lapses if substantial ongoing work on the project has not begun within five (5) years after the effective date of the appropriation or allocation. ® Once funds are lapsed they are no longer available for use by the municipality, and any portion of the lapsed municipal aid funds that the municipality has in its possession must be returned to the State. July 21, 1986, will mark the end of the five-year period for FY 1982 Municipal Aid. 0 In order to prevent FY 2982 municipal aid funds from being lapsed, your entire appropriation must be allocated to a project or projects which have undergone "substantial, ongoing work." All allocations and reallocations must be made and reported to this office by May 30, 1986. No allocation or reallocation statements will be accepted or approved after May 30, 1986. Work on the project or projects must be well underway by July 21, 1986. I have enclosed a grant allocation statement summary page (Attachment 1) which should be used to allocate or reallocate municipal aid funds. If you wish to allocate or reallocate you must list on the summary page all municipal aid projects and the amounts allocated to them. This document must be signed by the mayor or another city official or employee who has been authorized in writing by the mayor to certify reports. The grant allocation statement summary page must be accompanied by an ordinance or resolution which officially approves the allocation or reallocation. I have also enclosed a project description sheet (Attachment II) which must be used if funds are being allocated or reallocated to a project that has not been previously approved by the Department of Administration. Finally, I have enclosed a Municipal Aid Financial Report Form.. Instructions for filling out the report ti�.3:/::_f�.itit�3r..........W=. ......__... ' _ ... �._ r:a.��.n;i�::':L:n'xi:_e:•_ �i'°^r''_��' �- •fir The Honorable Tom Wagoner -2- March 12, 1986 are on the back of the form. Municipal aid financial reports must be submitted every month until the entire appropriation has been spent. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Eric Swanson at 465-2290. S ncerely, ,. �• fir, ��. Gary M. Bader Director GMB/cfm 1/1FL2/0312-01-73/63 Enclosures r. s_ n U.:'Yt s .. • Y h If,� • ; « ` •' 1 ,` : ~t'�' BILL sHFf xw, GOVERNOR rJ j j rr:1 w�, l ' 1t �+ Robert J. Sundberg Commissioner DM:PAKrNIsNTOF PUBLIC %AM't:'ry POUCH N ,W EAU. ALASKA 90811 O)WCE Of WE COMMISSIONER PNONFr "S-4371 March 13, 1986 N The Honorable Tom Wagoner Mayor City of Kenai ``' 210 Fidalgo �"'� Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Mayor Wagoner: The Alaska Highway Safety Planning Agency (AHSPA) is beginning its yearly planning process to develop the annual Highway Safety Plan (HSP). The HSP is the planning document for the Gevernor's Statewide Highway Safety programs and must be submitted prior to August 1st of each year to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for approval and implementation by October ist. The HSP utilizes Federal funds to implement projects designed to reduce traffic accidents, deaths, injuries and property damage on the Alaska road system. Each project must be based upon an identified traffic safety problem and must be designed to address and impact that specific problem. These highway safety projects are categorized into the following six program areas: 1 Alcohol Programs 2 Occupant Protection Programs 3 Police Traffic Services 4 Traffic Records 5 Emergency Medical Services 6 Safety Construction and Operations Improvements Other traffic safety areas that will be considered include pedestrian. bicycle and motorcycle safety programs. Although the 1985 traffic accident statistics for all accidents are not available at this time, preliminary statistics on the fatal accidents that occurred in 1985 are available. An analysis of the 1966 fatal accidents show that alcohol involvement is still the number one contributing factor in fatal accidents with unsafe speed remaining the second leading contributing factor. Other major contributing factors noted in fatal accidents include pedestrian in roadways improper land usage and inexperienced or inattentive driving. Although icy roads was noted as the contributin factor in eleven fatal accidents, most fatal accidents recorded in 1965 involved human error. It should also be noted that only 6 of the 126 pparsons killed in motor vehicle accidents were wearing seat belts and 19 or 15.1 percent of all 1986 traffic fatalities were pedestrians. ��b....rsc �Xr •. �i.: ..'.y.► I Ql.� .►f. 1+'7, ...a,,,a�Y�a7. ��.?'�`.e'. �.. I ~ -2- The ANSPA is seeking innovative highway safety projects that will help reduce fN traffic injuries and deaths on our roadways. Although we do consider projects in all six program areas as well as pedestrian, bicycle and motorcycle safety programs, we try to concentrate available funding to areas that will have the greatest direct impact on the reduction of traffic accidents, deaths and injuries. -Historically, these have been the Alcohol, Occupant Protection and Police Traffic Services program areas. As our funding level is quite limited, we encourage the participation of volunteers and the private sector whenever possible. The AHSPA approves a project application based upon its eligibility for Federal funding, the expected direct impact on traffic safety problems, the estimated cost/benefit of the project and the identification of a specific traffic safety problem the project activities will address. Of course, project selection is also restricted by the limited funds available and by Federal earmarking of a portion of the Federal funds. Special consideration will be given to the implementation of child restraint rental/education programs and safety belt use incentive programs during Fiscal 1987. Your ideas and participation are essential to the success of the statewide highway safety program and each suggestion will be given the utmost consideration for implementation. Should you be aware of a specific highway safety problem in your area or have an innovative idea that may contribute to the reduction of deaths and injuries on our highways please complete and submit the enclosed project agreement form (HS-1S at your earliest convenience. It is important that all sections of the project agreement form be completed and that the necessary signatures appear on, both the first and last pages. A step-by-step instruction sheet has been provided to help simplify the process. Upon receipt of your completed project agreement form, the AHSPA will review your proposal to ensure that it will meet the criteria for Federal funding. At that time, you will be notified as to the acceptance or non -acceptance of the project. Should your project be accepted as a possible candidate for funding, it will be included in the FY 1987 highway safety plan and submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by August 11, 1986 for their approval. The approval/disapproval by NHTSA of the plan is usually made known in early September allowing for an October i implementation date. It is essential that your completed project agreement reach this agency no later than May 15, 198 . Proposals sent after that date cannot be considered for the FY 1987 HSP. Please feel free to call me at 465-4374 if you have any questions or would like assistance from this agency in completing your . proposal. Sincerely, T. Michael Lewis, Program Director Highway Safety Planning Agency Enclosures i ?i�a�i74ulet.�•..f,': v'ldaiyl. �.�}LL;.Ss•:�,:e.�.s. 9ili .i. .'' MM W DRIP R'. OR COMMUNITY A REGIONAL AFFAIRS L1IV/Sm OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hon. Tom Wagner, mayor City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Bill SHEFFIEW, GOVERNOR O Fa em so JUNEALL ALASKA coati PHONE: Nor) 4 04M eW & S6TN AVENUE, SUITE 100 ANONORA0E, ALASKA MR PHONE: (W?) MISM (3 PauCH so JUNEAIA ALASKA 0?611 PHONE: boll46"M 0 1611 CUSHMAN STREET; ROOM M FAIREANIM ALASKA 99M PHONE: (poT) #WNS 0 Ra sox toes NOUL ALASKA WOW PHONE., MAY) I43•92TI \••'ll M '1. O Ra box 116 Kenai, AK 99611 ` BETHEL• ALASKA QM9 1-e bay PHONE: lOOT1019te6b Dear mayor Wagner: \•��������� REs March 14, 1986 DAY CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION, FY 87 Enclosed is the Day Care Assistance Program application for fiscal year 1987. The State -funded program assists working or training low and moderate income parents in meeting the cost of child care. The State also provides funds to assist in the cost of local administration of this program. These funds are based on ten percent of monthly billing amounts. The funds cover approximately 50 percent of the local administration costs. Should the municipality choose to apply, a program application packet is enclosed. This packet consists of the Day Care Assistance Program application for fiscal year 1987, a sample resolution, a sample agreement to subcontract local administration of the .program, (if applicable), a subsidy schedule for parents, and a maximum state payment scale. Should the municipality choose not to contract with the state, the law allows the Department to contract with child care facilities or another organisation. If the municipality chooses not to participate, I request a letter be sent to Ms. Lars' of my Anchorage office by May 15, 1986, in order that we may contract with another organization. We have enjoyed working with you in the past and we hope you choose to continue to offer this program. _ Yiu Al T I_ Mayor Wagner March 14, 1986 Page Two The completed and signed application, including the narrative and resolution, needs to be postmarked by May 15, 1966 to be considered for funding this coming year. Sincerely,, John Hope Director Enclosuress as stated cat June Harris, Local Administrator Carolyn Tuovinen, Grants Administrator Notifieds Stan F. Thompson, Mayor Kenai Peninsula Borough • °. • .— :..- it � __:S. Tyi r. s. 0 E 9 E -5 BILL SHEFFIEW GOVERNOR o , DU PARTIMNI T OF NATURAL RESOURCES SMERT ANNCHO AA 8LWA OMI S DIVISION OF PARKS AND OUTDOOR RBggWON PHONE: reorzrazass �, i,. / •?p'r. ANNCHORAAG& ALAWA 6i6/0 March 17, 1986 I 4 Re: May Board Meeting Dear Advisory Board Member: The preliminary draft of the Kenai River Plan will soon be going to the printer. That draft will contain the committee recommendations earlier , provisionally accepted by the board. The May board meetings are for the purpose of discussing and adopting the board's final recommendations for f o.. the plan.:::;:'.... After discussions with President Jefferson, the meetings will take the following format. May 15th will be devoted entirely to public comment, on y' any and all proposals. Citizens will be invited to speak on any recommendation of Interest, witty board members noting those comments for later board discussion. On May 16th and 17th, the board will hold work sessions when the various committee recommendations are discussed and adopted/rejected. The preliminary draft should be delivered to you around April 15th, to be followed by a briefing package around May 1st. • P Sincerely, 0 ve teph ns G , Project Manag r Kenai River Planning „ -1 DSiblh . 11 a s 4 4 � 4 9 � ' -'-• YYY � O i lf • • f • .c.. ...W, Q •• vim' EY. r M lJ ® Suggested by: Building Inspector CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 1123-86 ^ 6 ' t AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, '• AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4.05.040 ENTITLED i t „EXIT FACILITIES". WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has revised 13 AAC 50.0209 updating the Uniform Building Code to the 1965 Editions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that KMC 4.05.040 is amended as follows: 4.05.040 Exit Facilities: Section 1204, Exits and Emergency Escapes, of the Uniform Building code as adopted by this Chapter s emended by deleting the last sentence of the third paragraph and substituting the following: "Where windows are provided as a aj means of escape or rescue, they shall have a finished e111 height not more than 48 inches above the floor." Q PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 16th day'' of April, 1986. „ WAGONERTOM NAY-Ol z; 2 ATTEST: U C Pc•p+�: r -1J Janet a an, City Clerk Approved by Building Inspector: First Reading: April 29 1986 Second Reading: April 16, 1986 Effective Date: April 169 1966 3/27/86 -- -- eDo c " U CITY OF KENAI „ v eae" oj 1"NON11M. M5 MEMORANDUM FROM: Howard Hackney, Building Inspector "� \`f City of Kenai - . -,-- - • TO Councilmembere City of Kenai DATE: March 28, 1986 RE: Ordinance No. 1123-86 Ordinance No. 1118-66 passed March 59 1986 repealing KMC 4.05.040 entitled "Exit Facilities". The effective date of the ordinance ® ° is April 5p 1986.5 Since the passage of Ordinance 1118-869 the State of Alaska has revised their 13 AAC 50.0209 regarding exit facilities, and in the State order that the Kenai Municipal ode coincides with code, KMC 4.05.040 entitled "Exit Facilities" needs to be returned to the Kenai Municipal Code. - So that the least amount of confusion will arise with the upcoming building -seasons I am requesting that the effective date = ° of Ordinance 1123-86 be the same as the passage date, April 16, 1986. The Code Supplement, which should be iseued April 1, would be held until April 169 1966 to reflect the changes made by. Ordinance No. 1123-66. f� HH/clf s. 0 1 .. fr. • -" ' , G--3 SUBSTITUTE #1 Suggested byt Building Inspector CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0, 1123-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4.05.040 ENTITLED "EXIT FACILITIES" AND DECLARING THE PASSAGE OF THIS ORDINANCE AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has revised 13 AAC 50.020, updating the Uniform Building Code to the 1965 Editions; and, WHEREAS, the State of Alaska revised 13 AAC 50.020 which necessitates further amendment to KMC 4.05.040 after the passage of City of Kenai Ordinance 1118-869 which had repealed KMC 4.05.040; and, WHEREAS, the passage of Ordinance 1123-86 would not become effective until May 16, 1986, well into the current building season; and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Council finds an emergency existing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, so follows: Section 1: The City of Kenai Council hereby deciares an emergency to exist requiring the passage of Ordinance 1123-86. Section 2: KMC 4.05.040 is amended as follower 4.05.040 Exit Facilitiees Section 1204, Exits and Emergent Esce es, of the Uniform Building code es adopted by this er is amended by deleting the lest sentence of the third paragraph 19 • AWL ... 17 t q._ •'w and substituting the followings "Where windows are provided as a means of escape or rescue, they shell have a finished sill height not more then 48 inches above the floor." PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this second day of April, 1986. TOM WAGONE19 MAYOR ATTEST: Janet a en, City Clerk Approved by Building Inspector: First Reading: April 2, 1986 Second Reading: April 29 1986 Effective Date: April 29 1986 4/1/66 I o rr A ' (1 E J G-y Suggested bys Planning & Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE N0. 1124-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL KENAI ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN LANDS WITHIN THE HALLER/EVERGREEN/MCKINLEY AREA TO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TWO (RS-2) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.270 establishes a procedure to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai, and WHEREAS, a rezoning petition has been received from Mrs. Sharon Gerhard, representative, bearing signatures of a majority of the property owners within the designated area to rezone the referenced lands from Suburban Residential (RS) to Suburban Residential Two (RS-2) District, and WHEREAS, the Kenai Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted the required public hearing on March 26, 1986, and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended non -approval 'of the rezoning petition in accordance with Resolution PZ86-12. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Kenai shall be amended as follows: Section 1: Subject property consisting of those lands depicted in €xhibit "A" are hereby rezoned to Suburban Residential Two (PS-2) District. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 16th day of April, 1966. TOM WAGONERt MAYOR ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City Clerk First Reading: April 29 1986 =LA Second Readings April 169 1986 Effective Dates May 16 1966 jJ F CITY OF KENAI �.� lod e �4"of 0 • MONa Q0.9. MB MEMORANDUM TO: Kenai Advisory Planning do Zoning Commission FROM: Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECT: Resolution PZ86-12: Rezoning Lands within the Haller/Evergreen/ McKinley Area to Suburban Residential Two (RS-2) District DATE: March 20, 1986 BACKGROUND Applicant: Legal Description: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Existing Land Use Plan: DISCUSSION Petition signed by a majority of the property owners in the area, Sharon Gerhard, representative Reference zoning map for rezoning boundary Suburban Residential (RS) Suburban Residential Two (RS2) Medium Density Residential The City of Kenai has received a petition signed by a majority of the property owners within the Heller/Evergreen/McKinley area to rezone certain lands to Suburban Residential Two (RS2) District in accordance with KRC 14.20.2720 b-l-iii which initiates an amendment to the Official Zoning Rep. The attached map defines the area to be rezoned to the R92 district. There are 182 parcels within the area to be rezoned involving 109 different 1' 11 •-n CITY OF KENAI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ_&P--A%1 A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING (APPROVAL) (DENIA ) OF THE REQUESTED (REZONING) (LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT) SUBMITTED BY 1 Qua» CSZsl�2i�' �' App icon ..: -,�-- FOR WHEREAS, the Commission finds the following: 1. The subject property is currently zoned .l,AaA.& —C45 Z. The present land use plan designation of the subject property is - The proposed (ZONING DISTR CT) (LAND E PLAN DESIGNATION) f the.... affected property is - Tay, An appropriate public hearing as r quired hoe been conducted by the Commissionan That the following additional facts have been found to exiets n: _ `r_s NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Advisory Planning 6 Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned (REZONING) (LAND USE PLAN �....- - AMENDMENT) is hereby (RECOMMENDED) (NOT RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai City Council. PASSED by the Advisory Planning 6 Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, _ Alaska, this _ day of 19-- Chairman - - ••- -- -- _-----r;��° ATTEST: Planning bect9t8fY eie4 CITY OF KENAI Del edpdd o f 4" MO RID&GO WMA . N.AOU NMI MUMM01482U•n" PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Kenai Advisory Planning A Zoning Commission Public Notice is hereby given that a petition to amend the Official City of Kenai Zoning Map has been submitted by Mee. Sharon Gerhard, representative of the residents of the area to be rezoned. The property to be rezoned is the area known as HM and is borderded an the North brr Fifth Avenue, an the East by Evergreen Drive, an the West by Forest Orive, and on the South by Second Avenue, portion of Section U. TGN. RIM S.M. This property is currently zoned Suburban Residential (RS) district, a rezoning amendment to Suburban Residential - m (RS-1) has been requested. Public Hearing on this matter will be held by the Kenai Advisory Planning 8 Zoning Commission at its regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, March 26 1986 which commences at 7:80 p.m. in the Kenai City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this request should do so at this hearing or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Commission, 210 Fidalgo, Kenai, Alaska 99611 prior to March 26, 1986. Kenai City Council This zoning amendment is scheduled to be introduced by the Kenai City Council. an Wednbsday. April 29 1986. A Public Hearing will be held by Council on Wednesday, April 16. 1986 commencing at 7100 p.m.' In the Kenai City Hell Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this request should do so at this hearing or submit written comments to the Council at the above address prior to April 16, 1986. For more information phone 283-7933. Janet Loper Planning Specialist ;0 U iL IN- t... ,, ''' RS=2 designation allows a MINIMUM of 7,200 sq. ft. lot with a MAXIMUM of duplex size residences. (2 family) F L L P(D1 r� rl" 'HUX Fri L: r r/ u k LN j „%TT;/ �H44l -sue i .P7+ O c.- y City of Kenai March 29, 1966 Council Members City Administration Fromt Herrick A. Poore, Virginia A. Poore Re! Land owned In Kenai, borderd by Second Avenue, Forest Drive, Fifth Avenue and Evergreen Drive. We own S lots in the above described area. We are In favor of the suburban zoning (RS), and against any rezoning of this large areas It Is our belief the Council Members should vote NO on this rezoning proposal. 0 ^ - N . e� O f . {I ate'. "" �Y �I..•Y - A March 271, 1986 Dear Council Member We are writing to you to strongly urge you to vote ainst the zoning change currentl under consideration Crr several reasons• Y 1. First of all, we as registered property owners of lots 4,5, and 6 In the F.J.B. Subdivision, have never been officially notified of any - "''--- ---� considerations being made on zoning changes. We also wander how many other property owners were trot informed. 2. It is also our understanding that each property owner gets only :=as rag 1 (am) vote regardless of taw many lots they own. This would seem (+ . . . u ; a 4; � F a bit unjust and inconsistent with city policies of sellinngg land. For example, the city could sell a 60 lot to a developer to be parcel developed. the developer, then progressing with the project, sells but a few lots. At this time the new property owners (2 are all that would be needed) could move for a zoning change and carry the vote with their majority, severely hurting or even banWn*ti% the developer. this is an extreme case, to be sure, but we're sure you can see our point • 3. We initially bought this land for investment purposes with the knowledge that four-plexes could be built on the land, thus making the property more valuable. Now we have been informed (through an assessor) that this zoning clue $5,000.00 decrease in : '_.>k' ....:. u *._ would mean a the value of each of our lots. 4. Single dwelling homeowners in this area who are requesting this r change should have been aware when they bought or built their homes - what the zoning ordinance was for this area. They could have opted, that time, buy build in at to or a non-multiresidential area. We think this clearly states our position in this matter. Thank you Ow taking the time to consider our statements. Sincerely Nick R. and Dawn D. Trudeau Kenai Landowners p ,, t_ off... ' • � �. .. do ... ;` 3 v CITY OF KENAI 18LEPNONB�•�336 MEMORANDUM T0: Mayor Wagoner and City Council FROM: Janet Loper, Planning Specialist SUBJECT: Landscaping of Airport Way Triangle Strip DATE: March 26, 1986 At the regular meeting of the Beautification Committee on March 25th, the O Committee reviewed the three options presented by Mr. Carmen Gintoli and Mrs. Suzanne Little. At that meeting, the Committee made the decision to recommend that Option 02 was the most desirable with some minor changes. At a Special Meeting of the Committee on April let the Option will be reviewed again for the minor changes discussed. Mr. Carmen Gintoli will be presenting the three options to Council at the Meeting of April 2nd including the minor changes discussed by the Committee. N !` 44 17 Jim a KENAI BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE March 25, 1986 Kenai City Hall Tim Wisniewski, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Presents Nelson, Selby, Sheldon Absent: Wisniewski, (excused) Hakkinen, Also Presents Architects Gintoli 6 Little, Engineers Bryson 8 Wince, Councilwoman Bailie, and Mr. George Traughbler 2. AGENDA APPROVAL Agenda approved as submitted 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 11, 1986 Minutes approved as submitted S. OLD BUSINESS a. Airport Triangle Project - Report from Wince, Corthell, Bryson/ Carmen Gintoli Mr. Gintoli and Mrs. Little presented three options, each a different price range, geographical range, (berming) and concept. The Committee stressed the importance of easy maintenance for the summer crews. The Committee reached an agreement on Option d2 and asked that this be placed on the Council agenda for the next meeting. The Committee also agreed that one more meeting prior to the next Council meeting was in order for the two persons absent to review the plane. b. Report on Sidewalks on Both Sides of Airport Way This idea has been tabled. c. Report on Sannere & Poles No material received as yet from either Heidi Snow or Valley Decorating 6. NEW BUSINESS Mr. George Traughbler of the Wildwood Correctional Center met with the Committee to discuss the mutual working relationship between the City and the Center. Mr. Traughbler explained that the staff is not II ♦ , ,- W1 0 ♦ , ,- W1 0 s r 141 :.4 G`rz BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE S March 25, 1986 Page 2 constant and flowers are something that needs the kind of attention that the Center hoe difficulty in supplying on a consistent basis. The Committee and Mr. Traughbler agreed that the Center will be providing flowers on 9 trial or backup basis onlyFor future i projects such as the flower boxes, the Center is ideally in a position of assistance. 7. PARKS A RECREATION COMMISSION REPORT Minutes enclosed - no comments or questions a. COMMITTEE QUESTIONS A COMMENTS None Q_ 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next meeting of the Committee will be Tuesday, April let at 12:00 PM. ® r. Janet Loper " Secretary :L •. r 1 F zj ---- `-'-. - i--�-n;- ■ O i Spemrd NemSupply UNUTt 9.0. ROOM, A19aka 99N9111r ,1Z-914+ March 1 1986 t .r The Honorable Tom Wagoner J Mayor of Kenai Kenai Court House Bldg. Kenai, AK 99611 -' Dear Mayor Wagoner: I am writing regarding our Spenard Builders Supply store located in 'the City of Kenai. Our store is located very close to state easements and within those easements is one storm drain that is of concern to us. As the years have gone on, and the City of Kenai has expanded, we find our store location at a very low site elevation compared, to allowed building projects around us. As a result, during breakup and other times we now have a pond up to 18" deep where our retail customers are now expected to enter the store. Our "pond" continues in the back loading area and this Spring our problem will worsen due to the three 4-plexes built on Redoubt Ave. Their elevations are higher than our yard area causing further pro- blems for us, including ruined material. We feel the City has the ability and some responsibility to help us solve our problem. Enclosed please find sketch of area and proposal. We request permission to tie into the City storm drain that is located at the front corner of our store area. With proper authorization using licensed and bonded sub -contractors, we would like to locate drains on our facility and run a large line with steam thaw ability into your existing man -hole, below grade. i appreciate your efforts in looking into this matter and hope you can expedite whatever needs to be done in order for us to get this project underway. Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely yours, Rick Abbott Branch Manager Soldotna RA/vai11 BBC. CC: Dencil gold - Corporate Office 7 err fo �o Ott 000 22 r•u�wrw�� � _w� � �/i � +.+.+w.« .. 'ry+w��'1r' +�.�..»•• w• � .....r. -_. w w+_-• ..�..i..w+�.w � - ' � `l . •' ._.ww_rw.�.:a ...._.-..._..w..... ....._.........._..w..........� •:�••;.''-2.•F=',..�...,........_�.......�._„�,+„nw,_.w�.�rw.. .. Vim,. .r_ww�.rr.._•.r.r. _wrw„w�,�.•..,w.�_». .._.._.....ao,....:.wn.s.vw......,...•.....w...n.w.r...«»..»w..++wa.w..�.,..�....+.��r.• ., .. .'nxt %.,� .�ww�ww� • _ � . v � . �.r.�r»••_w...Ys.Y.rr.»w. .M.. J��.w��.,. I • . '' f�Ii . w.r..... .. .-. +. w.wr++w.....w..-.w.... � .......... �....s.ww..�•r•.•,...e.- w. w-•w.ww►r � _ _ _ __ _—•:rt}-- -r— - '. Y ....ywwrw..w.....�..�... ... �.••,•rr.rr._....�.r �.y.. .r..w...r,v.a..........w. ....--wr....wwr.r.... ..-...- ..... ..... .. ...•o,. _..r`�..... .. `��, _. - ••rrr�ww«r•w.rrr vw _..•...�.t• rwr.w...w .r..wswr ... ,.... _.. .......«.............. .. .._ ..- ... , .. , _ .. . ... .. .... w»... ';. - _ __ '-��, ` :�O ._..w............r.+•l .rww..r.....vw........ ...s...r....+r.....,.r,w.......a,ww.. ...».w..... .. __. .. «.... . .... .«..».mow.... ._ .., _u� �... ,Y •. rG'— .y. o CITY OF KENAI s NOR== KENALAUMM "Wit TQW"Gris m- MB March 189 1986 Mr. Rick Abbott Spenard Guilders Supply PO Drawer 930 Soldotna, AK 99669 Dear Mr. Abbott: I am in receipt of your letter dated March 12, 1966, to Mayor Tom Wagoner, concerning tying into the City of Kenai's storm drain that goes down Redoubt Avenue. Unfortunately, the manhole that is located on your drawing is not a :*' a storm drain manhole but a sanitary sewer manhole. See the attached drawing. It is against the State of Alaska and the City of Kenai'e laws and regulstione to discharge roof drains or surface run off into a sanitary sewer system. The storm drain system that goes along Redoubt Ave. is on the opposite side of the street from your building. If done properly, the City of Kenai does not object to tying into this storm drain. The City of Kenai does require, however: 1. A set of engineering drawings showing how you plan on tying Into the system and the method that will be used to preventQ' siltation and sediment from entering the storm drain. 2. That the construction work be done by a contractor that is licensed and bonded in the City of Kenai. The work will consist of not only furnishing and installing the culvert and Inlet manholes, but replacement of asphalt on Redoubt Ave. - -_ 3. A permit from the State of Alaska, Department of Transports- Lion for work done in the right-of-way since Redoubt Ave. is" --- State maintained I wish our idea was feasible since it would have offered a simple solution to the problem. If you decide to 0VPftp thin, you may ask your engineer to take a look at drywalls ortion basins to ° 7. r 0 r/ i"—.�.��- .... r ter.-�.•�w .--+r•�.+'�.�er�o.—w .rrr� F Mr. Rick Abbott March 18, 1986 Page 2 handle your surface run off. You might find it a more affordable arc a better solution to your problem. If there is anything I can do to assist yout please feel free to contact me. !� Sincerelyp -0&� eM*4 i _. Keith Korneliaq Director Public Works Department KK/aw r.: k Yfl• - JI�r�.'rw.r..•.,r.�..•y.•,.r,. rbrMrr. nM . .. o�: a••. ... � � tJ.i.. - . a , . ... � � � '( oj n `a h • -_ ,v CURVE DATA - T = Bl. 3AoP y� N. RIM = 78.67 .ram L. = 162.86 INV. 2"m 64.01 D = 100 LT MH to WDB — - --�— — 63.59 U.S. Ch G. 64.43 CITY Pf A. `�• M I,. •� I '4.j• y:y •1fir j �:;.}� ; �. i�.:. :: �,;::1• = REMOVE 8100 REPLACE $jr rQV A.C. PAVE. ^.. N. RIM 74.4$ INV. 62.90 h a. - .. • N.RIM M.H. a60.57 INV. 12� g3.131 J_ SPECIAL M.H. Exis 17 89 L.F 16" D.I. , PLUG EXISTING EAsr CLASS SO CLASS 82 IN RT W/EXPANDING • fi+. _ �: � IHV Sit : �.. Lf 41 / INSTALL NEW MANHOLE ON �, r Y. r p-,•L• P �� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER .• � v, tia A � MAAIN. TOP 41 PLUG INVERT <�::;�. _ :=: �}• J0� `�, j Y SOUTH 63. EAST TO THE SPRING LINE Q / OR THE PIPE. t lT . 1 •I Y - ,+s. ` .fit. _. _., ..- _ e • 9 .4 r- CITY OF KENAI "Od edpd ej �4"momm"o MA " TRU MONEIN- o MEMORANDUM FROMJL. im Rogers, City Attorney ity of Kenai TOe Councilmembere City of Kenai DATE: March 289 1986 RE: Katmai/Pines Hotel /Resteurant As most of the Councilmembers are already aware, the Katmai/Pines Motel recently filed bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in 0 Anchorage. At this time it may be helpful for the Council to review where the City stands in relation to this bankruptcy and what actions the Legal Department has taken in the last month with regard to the Katmai/Pines. In November 19859 the Katmai/Pines was over $1p300 behind in its payments for (Wst*r• .end =•eMpr+ : The Legal Department made demand of the Pines for the amount due. The Pines subsequently wrote a check to the City in the amount of E1,360.97 and when the City cashed the check the bank returned it due to uncollected funds. The Legal Department then sent a notice to the Pines demanding that they make good on the check and suggested in the alternative that the City would file a civil complaint unless the check was made good. During this time, the water and sewer charges continued to accrue. The Pines failed to pay the check and on December 20, 1985, the City filed a lawsuit to collect the $19360.97 plus $1,000 for statutory damages. Near the end of January, the City applied for a default '.in the case for the reason that the Pines had never answered the complaint. At this time it also came to the Legal Department's attention 'that there was a li tral.L t-ax lie. ;,Vin the amount of $76,000 on the property; that-"th-ere •was a ;,fial*su—r►Ibeing brought against the property; end, that Borbughr.sole '"rax-6jiti (in ® excess of $90,000) were allegedly due. s r r' A _ _ •, _ fir. . r i 1F Fy'isT� _i. ej n 77 A Before the default could be effectuated by the Courts, the Legal Department become concerned that the Pines might be proceeding toward bankruptcy and moved to collect as much money as possible at that time. The Public Works Department was successful in shutting off the Pines water on March 69 1986, but the Pines subsequently turned the water back on. Public Works Department again shut off the water, this time chaining shut their access. The City eventually received full payment for the water bill in the amount of $39046.26, in addition to a $20.00 bad check Pee, our filing fees in the case, and $200.00 attorney fees for the bad check case. The City subsequently dismissed the bad check case. Another problem was that the Pines was not keeping current in theirmante While they had been paying some, they were approximately two months behind by the time the City entered into the action to collect the water and sewer bill. Under their lease, the Pines is entitled to a 30-day notice before the City can file an F.E.D. The City had given them a 30—day notice on approximately February 219 1986 end were going to proceed to evict them on March 24, 1986 for failure to pay rent. Unfortunately, the Pines„filotd for bankruptcy on the day the City was to evict them. It is my understanding that they are presently over $29000 in arrears. We will be moving in the bankruptcy court to protect the City's interests by delineation of rent as an administrative expense of the bankruptcy proceeding to protect the City's interest. I am hopeful that the Pines will be compelled to keep current payments up and not fall into arrears any further. As the Council is aware, the City has had problems in the pest when leaeeee have gone into bankruptcy. The ultimate authority rests with the bankruptcy court to see that the City is protected. TR/clf 0 • P, pV. eo �-.ice .. _ - a • =`LET;'..?�. y a CITY OF KENAI • Noplam 0 WN..M = ,am 1- . .. ie:ev�oa�sa•%aas . 4 • April 39 1966 i }� Mrs. Lottie Edelman j President Fisherman's Packingg Inc. ;tt Drawer 2601 - - Kenai, Alaska 99611` Res Lot 19 Kenai Spit Subdivision Dear Mrs. Edelmen: Enclosed is a form of rAcis0ion for the lease of Lot 19 Kenai 0 Spit Subdivision. .If this meets with your approval, please }� complete the r is6ion and return it to the City. Your signature must be notarized.` Th City will take care of any recording fees involved with the +' :y ria ions In addition, as explained to you# by signing the resie ion, we will avoid eviction proceedings and the possibility of yo r incurring legal expenses associated with such e proceeding. t; Sincerely CITY OF KENAI _ Tim Rogers City Attorney A TR/clf Enclosure 2 .. �_. ,� ., �.`J 1Y� �.. _�;* of __ .. 3.. -� .• .. .... -s __ Ira MUTUAL RESCISSION AND RELEASE • ..wr KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTSs That on the day of . 1906 LIsTTIE EDELMAN 2661, Kenai, Alsoke, PRESIDENT, FISHERRRIS"PACKING, .6 rawer 99611, and the CITY GF KENAI, do hereby mutually rescind that certain Lease dated April 11, 1904, and recorded In Book 2 % at Page 3030 in the Kenai Recording District, Third Judicial District• State of Alaska, of the following described reel propertys Lot 1, Kenai Spit Subdiveion That in consideration of the mutual rescission end : termination of said Lease, LOTTIE EDELMAN and FISHERMAN'S PACKING, INC., and the CITY OF KENAI are each finally discharged as to the other on sold Leese. No representations have been made by one party to the other and that this Rescission is not effective until all parties have executed it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and scale the day and year first above written. CITY OF KENAI Dates Bys m. 3. Brighton City Manager ATTESTS one Whoon, City Clark Dates LOTTIE EDELMAN , w tottie Edelman A STATE OF ALASKA jea Cz THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of , 1966, LOTTIE EDELMAN, individually ee wail as in his representative capacity, being personally known to me or having produced satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before _ me and acknowledged the voluntary and authorized execution of the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public for Alaska :r=-- - My Commission Expiress - o STATE OF ALASKA ) " THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) ' }�= THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of 1906, WILLIAM J. Of:1OHTON, City Manages o� the City o sm , Alaska, being personally known s-o me or having produced s satisfactory evidence of identification, appeared before me and acknowledged the voluntary and authorized execution of the q : �Room foregoing instrument on behalf of sold City. r k�•., 42�E„ o ary Public for Alaska `' a ssfssss My Commission Expires r:. _ U _ =�� .. .. 0 �j . n U CITY OF KENAI Vd eapdal a/ Aw"" .,�.OKA OW r Dates March 24. 1966 To: Council _._. Froms JAret Whelan City Clerk Re: Clerk's seminar, March 9th thru March 14th. 'Aw Schedules :. a. Annual Clerk's meeting - Sunday b. Classes. Monday thru Friday 1.Federal Voting Rights act of 196S. 2.Title 29 Amendments. - 3.Ferformance Reviews. -. 4.Time Management. t S.Job Health. := The first day the institute ran concurrent sessions - elementary sessions for beginning Clerk's• advanced sessions for certified Clerk's. The advanced sessions were on local boundary commissions; special elections; and land deeds. katir ers illit=' 7i ?.� J:istice mes =te ested �o reviaw- t1u Fsdstal--Yotitss�ti=ht*:z N " - �'` aiith'-us..-but a anged-his mind Iurt priorito-the e; nae. expisiniitg _.-.. —. a!tvs;jpr_mO, : Alaska Division of Elections personnel reviewed the requirements U nd `procedural steps. ^ ... lit h. 0 INN l t�l • .•'t?Wl'>.•. - . - tf1'Sl�iL�•C'4"F.�' - - ,'; - •. ;y3 i�Y�'i. � , a !i►��'tlku r a:- '-_^>'. - i'',1 11 . tj.. Sf �_�.., �:_e..i-S- '!d.fir.9J.K�;ai'....tsiR�iN�:ae:.�.h,�f�Eif�/.�Sdi•1la n L:c;ili�i.EeAb- �. 01. JI 1 r x r i. TELEPHONE POLL OF { CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS MARCH 249 1986 Both loaders are down for repairs. The one loader repair work on + the engine has been approved by the Council on March 199 1986 in the amount of $11,410. The second loader has been overheating and now .' needs a new water pump and replacement of gears. The requested purchase order is to NC Machinery for :1,776.98 (see attached). The City Menager, Public Works Director, and Finance Director approve of this transaction. --- -- ,- A telephone poll conducted of the Council, by Sandy Wright, Public Works' Administrative Assistant resulted in the followings A. Mayor Tom Wagoner Yes a.:. Tom Ackerly Yee .., Sally Bailie Unable to Reach Jesse Hall Yes Ray Measles Yes - Chris Monfor Yee J John Wise Unable to Reach cc: Charlie Brown o k c+Q Janet Whelan : File 30007/0 .P i-J - - 1, . V PURCNASI ORDLR CITY OF KENAI KITE • — vOD A 210 FIDAL00 ST. PHONE 203-7636 ACOOMINGI I KENAI9 ALASKA 99611 P�ijAPPPPROOVED COOPYIN INK • REQUISMONER VENDOR NO. it-crr:v h, '►tit.. _... PlaI1+�� ..;t_. :a 4CO!,1 tur ry SHIP VIAL PREPAY SHIPPING • CHARGE SEPARATION INVOICE DESCRIPTION OR ARTICLE THIS PURCHASE 00. NUMBER MUST APPEAtL vAtKAGfSANDto THIS CHM Ott By PURCHASES AUIHORIMONLY WHEN SIONEDASOVI EIY THE FINANCE DIRECTOROR HISAUIHORIEEDAGENT UNIT I UNIT PRICE I ANMW p,,t•r.r,.1i t Ie.r water t mpn � 7t.10" rnro vharrt: 5suk)55 gRsket M. 7"6? notaket i 104.1" 1tt%+i;1'l (it r)pv3i ► �" .sf)i Ci .i•. i h 4"n452 (5s6297) r,Frul 3It14r��'r : ; 1 t711 1t'1 ?4 7'c3r.15 (553604) near ROT Cttr, (VOT;d) .ram � t?•. 5-,7h14 rt•ne R(!T eccre. drive 0off") 1 SS ail r• elcrrvt; 7f447fin.1 (557660) ..Par 57T (us-11) ? 79.11 5570i+ liq"Vi"(1 ?i:.f•L 7S6773 joar W Camp Drive 11 �.13 49294? onrket r►Hn _ yF 7%fl;07 (c,507) cnrr 411T oil Otarr!) (uqN") 1 44� 95117q rear �.r)T oil 01M, tfrivtj ??.0 T/S11Ctl heorilso 1 i ' 1 .: 7 6V1341 front rover t,it •tTATL,-:V-' I ciElt`V REAn .Tit ?-Wli fn If) MUnr., `r• Pv in for %1.1 coat .i " reif-ht to anai .. V-reirttt f,,%r ttjln pi) its on 1104 �� TOTAL ?tCj •, e T i tT l: E+! r r g T c; " t I 1 r• E. I A 1 u r'i�i�f? I T T ,. ; 1_6317n-211123 �H D1tPARTMENT - -- BY Yl . _Vi 45 : 11 HBHD 0s iuuai city Conseil F1l0Mt Charles A. Brown, Finance Director �RQ, DMI March 259 1986 SULIMt Debt Limit, H.B. 521 I received a phone call today from the Department of Revenue for the State of Alaska regarding my letter to Representative Mike Navarre of March 13. The Department is reviewing the figures to determine if it is true that the Borough could use up a city's debt capacity. The "Net Debt Outstanding" in my letter appeared reasonable to the Department. The "Percentage Applicable to the City Of Kenai" was taken from our 6-30-85 Financial Statements, and the Department: acknowledged that they were probably still reasonable. They did question my Kenai assessed value figure for 1985 of $266,3789000. The State apparently has certified 1965 full value for Kenai at $282,950,800. My figure came from our 1985/86 budget (the Borough later certified to us that the taxable assessed value was 0275,024,636). T. discussed this with the State Assessor and was told that the differences are probably because the State adjusts the Borough's figures upward to bring assessed values to market values. The Department of Revenue also said that 1986 values would probably not be used because they have-not yet been certified by the State. So, 1985 and 1964 would be used. The Department provided the following informations Kenai 1985 Assessed Value $ 282,950,800 Kenai 1984 Assessed Value 179,859,530 - 62, 10,3 0 2 Average Assessed Value 23 , 05, x 7% Maximum Debt Capacity -16,195 Therefore, according to the State, the picture is much bleaker than t presented in my March 130 1986 letter. if H.B. 521 were law, we would have already exceeded our debt limit by some $4,000,000- i J �4. 0 .gn . t If ONE 10- F CITY OF KENAI %Od Cap" of 4" MORNWO NOUL ALUM OMI TEU"ONEM-IM March 13, 106 Honorable Mike Navarre Representative, State of Alaska Pouch V (Mail Stop 3100) Juneau, Alaska 99811 Dear Representative Navarret I understand that the H.B. 521 is currently in the House Community and Regional Affairs Comittes. ThLe bill would limit municipal G.O. debt to 72 of the average full value of taxable property of the municipality for the last two Years* Further, for purposes of determining the G.O. debt for a city within a borough, the overlapping debt from the borough is included. Not debt is allowed in the computation in both cases. The figures below are estimates, taken from the City of Kenai financial statements and budgets, and updated through discussions with the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Percentage City of Applicable Kenai's Name of Net Debt to city of Share Governmental Unit Outstanding Kenai --0 of Debt City of Kenai, Alaska 2,800,000 ITO 0 X $ 2O-8-006000 Kenai Peninsula Borough 180,000,000 8.802 15,840,000 Central Hospital Service Area 15,000,000 11.272 1,690,500 Total Direct and Overlapping Debt 9 &2.3.30,500 City of Kenai Assessed value, 1986 313,500,000 City of Kenai Assessed Value, 1985 266,378o000 579,878lOOO It 2 Average Assessed Value 2890939,060 Maximum Debt Allowance 6 —4 Page Z Therefore, under the provisions of the bill, the City of Kenai will have already surpassed its maximum allowable debt and will be prohibited from issuing new debt. The ironic part of this is that this situation was caused by Borough debt, not City debt. City net debt is lose than lx of our averaged assessed value. However, because the Borough has a much larger tax base than the City, _ its debt limit under the bill would not be reached. The result is that Borough - - • debt is more of a burden on the City of Kenai than it is on the Borough as a whole. Speaking for myself, and not necessarily for the City of Kenai, I as not opposed to reasonable debt limitations. However, I ask that overlapping debt be excluded from the calculation. Sincerely, Charles A. Brown Finance Director 1 CAB/vyj A 91 '� •�7,411. 3 :41 R Z s v °„�{;J.F7:'. • Ar1.�.%� �,i..1v,. .,t , �L'±f1: l •� , iai�Y/I. t S. . -•.ifiirL=ez'.i.c5'1sri.s.�r-_.....a�et+YsiLv,-��a..a.u,s�izr.�w�'��i��`^�.Siyk::�.:,t.1.::5�c�' �xi.• ! _ _ �„ - .b o 0 .a KENAI PLANNING 8 ZONING COMMISSION March 26, 1986 - 7sO0 p.m. Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Presents Lewis, Bryson, Carignsn, Oleson, Osborne, Smalley, Absents Zubeck, unexcused 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda approved as submitted n 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None - a, j� 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS Resolution PZ86-121 Rezoning lands within the HEM Area to RS-2 ° Mrs. Jackie Russell come forward and spoke for the rezoning stating that from a realtore point of view, when 4 plexes are built in an area, the aIngle family units are harder to sell. There are many absentee owners who invest in the property but sae not live in the area <. and are not aware of the impact with the higher density. Mrs. Russell owns a 2 acre parcel which has been subdivided into smaller lots. Peggy White, also an owner of property within the area, spoke against =' the rezoning stating that the neighborhood has been established as a. multi -family dwelling area and is against form homes which can be a` worse looking then 4 plexes. Mrs. White has a tri-plex,at the current �. time and has plans for more. Mrs. White stated that she is not against a compromise with perhaps a buffer between the areas since development of greater density appears to be -nearer the elementary d =` t school. Jim Trudeau, owner of lots between 4th and Sth Street spoke against the rezoning because he had purcheeed his lots as an investment planning to -construct multi -family unite on all lots. The rezoning would cut his investment in half. Mr. Trudeau stated that the sewer 8 water that were put in were done so for multi -family units. Mr.:-- Trudeau feels that there are more multi -family units than single: -;-`- family units and further that the trailers and farm homes are more degrading then the 4 plexee. Duncan Wileack, lives outside the City limits but owns a 4 plex in the ores and spoke against the rezoning. Mr. Wilseck feele that anyone who builds a single family dwelling should check into zoning first so they Sri, know 4 plexee are allowed. .. .. ... -- ... ... n• .. .. - .. o ....1--- PLANNING COMMISSION March 269 1986 Page 2 Al Poore, owner of property in the area spoke against for the reasons stated prior by the other owners. Ray Barrett (Notes Mr. Barrett stated that he sold his property to the Whites and does not indicate if he owns property in the area or lives in the area) Mr. Barrett stated that he sold the property to the Whites for the purpose of multi -family units "because the City of Kenai planned that the area be multi -units. This is not an area that is going to support $1509000 homes and should be used for multi -family units". Oliver Amend, property owner and resident of the area, spoke for the rezoning stating that there are plenty of multi -family units and firmly believes that there should not be any more than there are there right now. Mr. Amend spoke with a contractor who built in the area who stated that if the some number of 4 plexes were built in hie neighborhood he would be doing the same thing. Mr. Amend explained that he fell: the people speaking were not clear about the rezoning in that the City is not rezoning the area, it is because of a petition of the property owners in the area. Mr. Amend stated that he has lived in this area for 10 years and is a builder and would like to attract the long term kind of people that are better for a stable economy, these are people who invest in the long term, a number of years and will generate the more stable dollar. The float plane basin is close to this area making it an area for growth and I think if these people would back off and think about it for a bit, I think they would agree that homes do not have to be farm homes, but for the long run are more stable and draw a more stable population bass. The petition tells me that there are more people that do not want multi -family units than there are here tonight. For the most part, from what these people have said, they don't live in the area, just own property and don't have the same concerns as the residents. Paula Trudeau spoke against the rezoning and stated that they were assessed for water 6 sewer and stated that it is for multi -dwellings. Do we get reimbursed if the property is rezoned? Tim White, husband of Peggy White, stated that he opposed the rezoning and pointed out to the Commission that most of the signatures were of persons living from 4th south. "I think the whole thing is ludicrous". Mr. White stated that he is against the lot size of 7,200 sq. ft. as "he has been told by a bank that the only way he can finance is to split the lot and two buildings on the lot and end up with 5,000 eq. ft." MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to approve Resolution PiZ86-129 rezoning referenced lands to RS2, seconded by Commissioner Osborne A ii �± �� Y4ir+(hir. PLANNING COMMISSION March 26, 1986 Page 3 Commissioner Bryson reviewed the figures of property owners and number of parcels on the petition. Planning Specialist Loper explained that 51% of the property owners are required to sign an initiating petition. Commissioner Smalley restated the question asking, "if a person owns 8 lots is that not in effect 6 votes not 1". Answer, no as •, the initiating petition is only asking for a percentage of persons who -, a hold property. Commissioner Smaller asked It that meant, "if these individuals owned these lots and placed them in a different family name they could have had 8 votes. In all true aspects of all land ` represented only 31% signed the petition". Commissioner Bryson asked If there was an opinion from the Attorney. Answer, this was set up at - -_ -.. - --- - -- -.- - -.---. the time of transfer of zoning to initiate zoning. Commissioner Bryson �. stated that he would not be in favor of this with those figures without an attorney's opinion. Commissioner Bryson stated that he was not aware that that area was assessed, Councilman Wise answered that only Eadies Way was assessed becguee it was not an established street at the time of the district or evan a paper plat. Commissioner Bryson ` asked for an explanation of notification for the public. Planning a Specialist Loper explained the procedure. The Commission and Individuals from the audience continued the discussion of the voting. Councilman Wise advised the Commission to read the code under amendments and it was adopted by the Council, Commissioner Smalley stated that it is ch911engable. Planning Specialist Loper was asked - - to read the portion of the code pertaining to the ownership. '. Commissioner Carignan stated that he has always been in support of trying to maintain a residential nature if there is one existing. I ° have heard many of the property owners that are interested in rezoning are in the area of 3rd, 4th, and Sth Avenues. I would be in favor of restructf this rezoning map. Commissioner Smalley stated that rre9etitioneve here I have the encouragement to vote ° if here would in favor of it, however, based upon the testimony here tonight I intent to -vote against it. Despite what is in our code I haves. problem with our voting power. VOTE t Motion failed unanimously. J.- Commissioner Carignan commented that he would advocate the petitioner restructure the size of the area and resubmit before the Council meets. Councilmen Wise stated that action reference the rezoning will go to the Council in this form and will be adopted in ordinance form for introduction. At the time of introduction there is no comment. To oppose this your option is to approach your Council individually either by by writing or personal contact because at the time of Any introduction the ordinance can be amended or defeated. member of the Council can offer an amendment or have it struck from the consent V,. agenda. If it fails on introduction it is dead. = f: • .. �y._ '. _..r -.�. a v^"".+....+-...-.-.. �.. .� `_ _'_i - _i.:a -�. r_ � "_ _ — - +•t�'� - t— „ -,VOL r PLANNING COMMISSION March 26, 1986 Page 4 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 12, 1966 Minutes were approved as submitted 6. OLD BUSINESS None 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Vacstion of Two 50' ROW'e within R.N. Thompson S/D. This vacation request came the day of the packet and had no prior staff review. Since then, Borough and City staff have reviewed the request and find many questions. The Landscaping code addresses a buffer between two different land uses which the ROW's provide, however, one individual owns both parcels in question. The Borough has agreed that if the Planning Commission decides to allow the vacation to be sure to add a disclaimer that if at any time that rear parcel is developed, the appropriate buffer will be put back. The other possibility would be to rezone which eliminates the need for a buffer altogether. Councilman Wise asked for the justification of the vacation, there is no indication of what the property owner intends. Councilman Wise pointed out that this also vacates a portion of a section line vacation. Commissioner Bryson asked for the zoning of Tract B, answer RR. And the zoning of Tract A, answer IL. The Commission discu::sed the plat. According to the Borough, a preliminary only exists. Mr. George Bradford stated that several of the very old plats are assumed to be final and the streets dedicated. Commissioner Bryson stated that under that criteria if you vacate the ROW's adjoining Tract C you would be landlocking those lower parcels. George Bradford suggested the Commission would be safe if they placed a stipulation that Tract C reverts to acreage so there is no doubt. MOTIONt Commissioner Smalley moved to table this issue until the property owners are contacted to come before the Commission and identify use and intent, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously b. Preliminary Plat PZ86-10: Etolin S/D Reelat Lote_5 & 7 The Commission noted several discrepancies on the front plate of the plat. The Borough has been made aware and the staff comments make note of the fact. This plat is for the Carr's Mall expansion. .. - _ - ..._.._.... �..r-- �_y ....�..�.._ ...�....—.w • r ^ram PLANNING COMMISSION - March 26, 1986 V r° ; _ Page 5 ' MOTIONS Commissioner Smalley moved approval of Resolution PZ86-10 with incorporation of ALL staff comments, seconded by Commissioner Carignen VOTES Motion passed unanimously c. Preliminary Plat P186-11: Three Wood SJD This is a standard subdivision in the Candlelight -Linwood area. MOITIONs Commissioner Smalley moved approval of Resolution PZ86-11, seconded by - Commissioner Osborne _-..719 VOTE Motion passed unanimously u 6. PLANNING Commissioner Smalley asked that th6 Commission set another work session prior to the next meeting to get rolling on these ordinance revisions so summer is nearly upon us. f -+ The Commission further discussed the voting procedures when"• considering rezoning and directed Planning Specialist Loper obtain an ° opinion from the attorney. 9. REPORTS a. City Council None b. Borough Planning None ct, C111 Administration _ U -- -- None 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO 8E NEARD None y. .. - tan y Li 1 ;air PLANNING COMMISSION March 26, 1986 Page 6 11. INFORMATION ITEMS Council Agenda Borough Planning Agenda No comments or questions 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS do QUESTIONS None 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting of the Commission is Wednesday, April 9th with a work session prior to the meeting at 6:00 PM. Janet Loper Planning Specialist F u M 0 16, KENAI PLANNING do ZONING CONNISSION March 12, 1986 - 7:OD p.m. Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman 14- 6 t t 1. ROLL CALL Present: Lewis, Bryson, Carignan, Oleson, Osborne, Smalley, Zubeck Z. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda approved as submitted 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Kenai Peninsula Borough Landfill: Permit Renewal 6 Expansion (Carried over from last meetino) Chairman Lewis asked that representatives from the Borough come forward to address the issue. Tom Boedeker, Borough Attorney came forward and stated that certain questions had come up regarding the scope of the review and the question is not whether you like the landfill but the scope of your action in accordance with the ADEC is a determination of whether we are in compliance with your zoning code and that future plans or matters of operations violations were immaterial to the question. We felt we were in compliance, that this would be a non -conforming use and as such it would be grandfathered in and we are not in violation of that -code. I have read the memorandum from your city attorney and I will answer any questions. Commissioner Bryson asked that the City Attorney review his promo. City Attorney Rogers stated, "What I tried to do is give you a historical perspective, I'm not sure that we have a total picture and I indicate in the memorandum that a title report on the property may be of some benefit. Refer to Exhibit A, which sets out that portion of Section 36 which is at issue here and I typed under the various diagrams of the property there what we ascertained to be the area where initially an easement was given to the Borough. Aleo, what DEC permit was issued in.1981 and other lessee the state gave to the Borough covering what appears to be the some land. It raises come interesting issues to Yhich I have no answer. However, the question to me was generic insofar as dealing with this landfill. u PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 1"6 Page 2 It became apparent in discussions at Council and others that there are those in the City that do not want the landfill to continue. Currently, as addressed in the memo the Borough does want to continue it and in fact is talking about a substantial durational continuance with substantial expansion of the whole area. Some of the wterial presented to you previaiely shows Game of the history and scope of the landfill. The question that we still have that is not addressed in the memorandum concerns the grandfather argument that they have a prior non -conforming use at a period of time that the city did not have planning & zoning powers, therefore even use was consistent with Borough planning and zoning, Avet stated use or purpose for the property would in effect be tantamount to a change in that. I don't necessarily agree, although I am not going to state unequivocally that they do not have grandfather rights as it is termed by some people on that property. There are a number of issues that are unclear to me at this point, insofar as a legal status of that particular property. I am distressed as I indicate in the memorandum at the manner by which the property was conveyed. Without a durational limitation on its use Specifically stated in an easement for purposes of a landfill or associated uses. I'm not sure what that means. I'm sure a court would have some problem deciphering what that specifically means so I don't think it is perhaps as cut and dried as some would indicate, I dont think the City is without a defensible position in denying the Borough what they went, I think there are a number of options available which may lead the Borough to perhaps consider the possibility of negotiating a period of time lose than what they are contemplating for that particular parcel. In reading some of the historical matter it became apparent to me that Initially that landfill was opened up as a result of efforts by the highway department to extract material for the road, as a result of their extraction it was to be Pilled with landfill material and somehow I was led to believe in reading the materials that the durations, perhaps initially thought to be tied to that, that at the completion of the highway department operation, somehow the landfill d eThat certainly is not evident from reading operation woui ceas. the easement. As I state here, the easement proposes to gift the Borough Carte Blanche in the operation of the landfill without any durational limitations. As an attorney that bothers me. I have tried 4 to point out that 1) you have before you the permit issue and whether or not, in your opinion, they are in compliance with the planning-4 zoning for the City. That determination is to be made in your Judge- ment. 2) addressing the non -conforming use, I am not prepared to come down on either side after only two days of researching the issue, 3) } whet I Pelt are the ramification of trying to close down the landfill Q by various mean, what defenses I felt the Borough would have available. That gets into the legal ramifications which does not concern you but I did want to touch on those issues because depending K a7 PLANNING COMMISSION March 129 1986 Page 3 on your actions we are going to be proceeding along one avenue or another. Without a doubt the City and Borough are going to have a difference of opinion. I might add tha%�_�courts are not to be feared. Courts exist to resolve controversies wVre different entities differ and it may case to that. It has been festering now for quite a few yeare. Councilmen Wise stated that "their request is that we not object to their DEC request: My understanding was that the application was for approval of their DEC permit." Attorney Rogers stated that what they are asking here is a finding that they are in compliance with planning and zoning laws and piggy backing that onto your acquiescence perhaps with DEC. If I'm not mistaken, what the Borough is asking for now•ie a finding from planning and zoning that you are in compliance with that planning and zoning code. Tom Boadeker agreed, stating that the wording could give a misinterpretation. What is required to submit an application to ADEC an a site is a certificate from the local zoning authority as stated. That does not preclude that jurisdiction from objecting an other gro=de. Ne did not expect the City, by approving this at this stage, just carte blanche say we do not object and give up any right to raise issues with ADEC in the permitting process. Attorney Rogers stated that not giving approval would be tantamount to disapproval or denial of his request. Commissioner Bryson asked Attorney Rogers if approving the request for a period of time less than the S year period be interpreted se a denial, answer, an approval for any period of time would weaken the City's position insofar as maintaining non compliance with planning 6 zoning and it was not a legally pre-exieting use. By approving it for any period of time you perhaps would be acquiescing that at Some poi9t of time•it was a legal use unless you have a disclaimer with it. YoUP" function tonight, if you disapprove it would be tantamount to finding non-compliance with planning A zoning. Councilman Wise stated that !'foss yeare, my position Is that it is a non -conforming use and what they are planning is to expand a non- conforming use." Attorney Rogers directed attention to the maps again pointing out that the shaded area they are planning on going into is a new area and is expanding. NOTE: Chairman Lewis called a break in the meeting to check tapes. Chairman Lewis opened the meeting to the public. There was no public comment. Councilman Wise stated that he had asked two persons to be in attendance. Nr. Joe Arnsee, Chairman of Solid Waste Disposal Site Conlesion and Mr. Nike Luckey of ADEC. ui - Jai - • tt ' . �• off" 'W.. 's - _-•,•.mil-/ -_.- .• {�.... .. . 4, . q ` 1, � 11 PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 1996 Page 4 Mr. Joe Arnese came forward and spoke. Lest year the Borough put forth a bond issue to construct an incinerator in order to eliminate these type of landfill problems and it was defeated in the polls. We are currently in the process of trying to rekindle the issue and are about to begin a site selection process to establish exactly how and where we would operate an incinerator if we got the bonding approval. It is my sense that Commission, Borough administration, Borough Assembly, are in favor of this alternative, however, it does not help your problem this evening. I hope that we can keep in perspective the fact that the Borough has its job to do, the City has its job, we do the best job we can given the constraints of money available. The Commission recognizes that existing site for the landfill is probably not the best, however, the best interests for the short term are to keep the landfill where it is, allow it to expand, and until ouch time as we can take the step into the next phase, that of an incinerator. Councilmen Wise stated that the proposal is to keep this landfill going into the year 2000, and if I read you right, that Is not the intent of the Solid Waste Commission. Mr. Arness stated that he does not know why the documents state the year 2000 unless it is the potential is that we don't run into this again in 5 years. If the City would feel more comfortable for the permit to read a shorter duration, the bottom line is that we are doing what we can do to solve the problem. Chairman Lewis brought the issue back to the Commission. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved for denial of the permit on the basis of non compliance with the existing zoning code, seconded by Commissioner Ooborne. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 26, 1986 Commissioner Smalley - on page 5, instead of "stated" insert "asked." Commissioner Bryson - concerning Mr. Hackney's statement, insert "i.e." home occupations. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of the amended minutes, seconded by Commissioner Carignan VOTE: Motion passed unanimously i PLANNING CONNISSION Hatch 12, 1986 = Page 9 6. OLD BUSINESS None .. 3 7. NEW BUSINESS _..... a. Vacation of Portion of Coral Street and Portion of 40' Utility Easement - Gusty S/D Add 01 - City of Kenai This is an accompaniment to the plat seen at the last meeting and presented by Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer. NOTIONS Commissioner Carignan moved approval of vacation of portion of ; easements as stated, seconded by Commissioner Bryson. VOTE: „t r3 Notion passed una:+ia.-.-;usly ; b. Preliminary Plat PZ86-7s Beluga S/D, first Assembly of God Replat This plat removes a lot line combining two lots to allow probable ° expansion of the church. Commissioner Oleson will be abstaining from voting. . NOTIONS Commissioner Smalley moved approval of PZ86-7, seconded by Commissioner - Osborne VOTES 13 c Motion passed unanimously j' c. Preliminary Plat PZ86-8: Eventyr S/D #2 This plat continues the name unto the adjoining government lot. NOTIONS Commissioner Carignan moved approval of PZ86-8, seconded by Commissioner • :.-per t' Bryson VOTES Notion passed unanimously d. Preliminary Plat PZ86-9S Sprucewood Glen S/C +1g. Revision N2 This is the same satellite as the two previous plata, moved to the west. "y PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 1986 Page 6 MOTION: Commissioner Osborne moved approval of PZ86-9, including all staff comments specific to the City Engineer's comments regarding no access onto Walker Lane, seconded by Commissioner -� VOTE s Notion•passed unanimously 8. PLANNING Regarding the draft Townsite Zone and Site Plan Review Ordinances, Planning Specialist Loper informed the Commission that the Landscaping Review Board had reviewed both documents, found them to be acceptable to this point and will be attending the next work session with the Commission. 9. REPORTS a. City Council Councilman Wise had no comments b. Borough Planning Commissioner Bryson reported on several Borough igeues. c. City Administration Planning Specialist Loper gave a report on issues that will bo coming before the Commission. 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 11. INFORMATION ITEMS None 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS 8 QUESTIONS None WiL -- CO 0 C PLANNING COMMISSION March 12, 1986 Page 7 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting wee adjourned. The next regular meeting of the Commission will be Wednesday, March 26th with a work session beginning at 6:00 PM. Janet Loper Secretary/Planning Specialist 0 F q CITY OF I as .. .__.. t• . March 249 1986 Mr. Murph O'Brien State of Alaska DOT/PF P.O. Box 196900 Anchorege, AK 99519-6900 - SUBJECT: KENAI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY - UPDATE 1986 = Deer Mr. O'Briens - I have reviewed the above subject document. Enclosed are my hand-written comments on the pertinent copies from the document. I , only reviewed the projects in the Kenai area that I knew something about. .• A suggestion that might help locating things in the final copy Is an -::-- index with page numbers. I think you have done a super job of �'- organizing this documentt It is much better than any thing I have seen in the poet. Call me if there is something else I can do. Sincerely, ----- — '"" of @-,P a Keith Korn lie, Director Public Norke Department KK/sw Enclosures u et ., s64a?. �.0 b.. ,� },•t;,`.; • • .. r, .. fit __.'".i-.(:• , »W`i'�...}idl��LlY...'. s --•Mf�::J�6ilNwj fit-:. . `frr ,, t i��jM�l,r1aY.+ '.�l t:x a.s.,.. .swra.. _:�•ati.»six • i n sue' 4 ri} r . ral 1983 HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS fpt �irpert apposs/tssbsoak !. Anther POOR !. Men Crash 4. keg ctNk (Nahost City) •. Ceaaasy 7. cissbaeski S. clan Guleh p. cow" Lore NoR ibs • /aa•• L, 3, lii, 1q 12. is silt 13. ►eudibs Lams/Rossi Raye 34. tunny River/Sttdlo/ssost Lk. .tj 6. tea.• t. impw. peotear d: poe/e'T 17. Reaat Altorsste Robot Slur 1p. Ribleloyloil Well !l. lalbt/Volt !!. Lou notlooltsout Lake !!. Lowellloiet 36. Raskeys Lake. kseh Rt.ls.vare Yvy. lottroetttoo !7. Mteilebtk/hark !S. North Anther River !!. Mereh Reaai si/hvy Theses 1. is 6 I1 Aesurteetioo Rivet 12. soldovta Airport Rd.•Keis St. !!. soldevialhkolol Say6e146vts/Audersee 34. sward t►/aysy 4. sports Lose 37. Sterlibl sirbvay 31. twteaeas Lska Ak M. 981119h h+. Akr/ert 41. Knot Airport +V042. Reast Airport 43. pert 6rsbas Airport 66. Soldovis Airport 45. s.wrd Airport —%efdeena •ornery 47. is,sli.k say Sbattle terry teq 48. Sabat ferry lswiesl at Paessol.7 sit%. 69. tabor ►tab cook so. Saw Mall most tatf.r Rashesak perk kettle Ferry Rely !!. Rsoilot sacker 0*!4. Robot Mail most garb" !!. Mb►laklk tsthsr 37. dwis tatty tarfsal wed possessor MS. M. Swart Forty tonisal St. Sward seo11 lost heNot So. shuttle Ferry Vessel Aul U. Iswth dt July R.R. per * Projects listed alphabetically and not order of priority ii :4a • sS, ..;'•r,.�,�*,��•: ;�°•,3ri�.LinL":r. �.:�_;��i�i'ri'i4=t� 'r-'�1 _d'r�y�i„•'i,,:'�rbYY.��tl;Jl'':,ce'titS.:tiiF:_ �:ai • _. r.. �i.•.LrriW:�iBi��'.IcL'i%dr/ �7� : a _ - Project Number , Project Title Agency C 14 Funny River OR 117300) Bridge/Scout Lake (SR 118700) DOT&PF ' ..rs 1983 KRIS Project Proposal: Phase I: Scout Lake (Sterling Hwy to Funny River Rd); Widen to 36', pave. Construct 26'-wide bridge, boat _. ramp and parking area next to bridge. Phase II: ! Funny River: Mile 13.71-Mile 17.26: Widen to 361, pave. Phase III: Funny River: Mile 10- Mile 13.71: Widen to 36', pave. Project Status: Phase I: Design completed for bridge and road, cost: $500,000. Phase II: No activity. Phase III: No activity. Estimated construction cost of Phase I: $6,800,000. Funding Source: Chapter 50/80: $500,000 for design. _ O 15 Halbouty Road OR 117665) KPB d 1983 KRTS Project Proposal: Mile 0.0-Mile 2.84: pave to 28' rural standard and improve drainage. -- Project Status: Project completed in 1983 by KPB, -- cost: $1,600,000. .k Funding Source: KPB municipal grant program 1983:;: `T $1,600,000 for construction. _ 16 Homesite Loop (SR 117630) Forest Drive and Redoubt Avenue DOT&PF •;Y i ' 1983 KRTS Project Proposal: Mile 0.0-Mile 2.15. Lower grade, pave to 40' urban standard ' Project Status: No activity. Estimated project cost: $2.1 million. Funding Source: N/A .7.�`._ in+.P-.S._-:Z}'1.-,i:=. r�j+io �. .�..� - '. i.:, ;�,';• i;.:�• •4 , + ..Si�i.��Gmi.. ` - — �.J:; -.+.i�a'frt%uxcuwYtY.ar...�.ra�.'.lu�leix iliili' _ o 21 w Project Number Project Title 17 Kenai Alternate (North Kenai Bypass)- ` r 83ency`.. KPB 1983 KRTS Project Proposal: Construct and pave to - Or . - 28' rural standard. d .Project Status: No activity Funding Source: N/A -- - - - — 18 Kenai Spur (SR 117600) MP 0.0 to 14.0 OOUPF 1983 KRTS Project Proposal: Mile 1.18-Mite 10,57 R and Mile 12.16-Mile 14.0: pave to 48' (4 lanes) --- _ ,. and 6' shoulders. Project Alternatives: 4 lane from Mile 1.18-3.Oyand from Mile 12.16-14.0. y Project Status: OOT&PF has allocated $200,000 in Federal preliminary engineering funds to conduct a design and location report for considering the widening of Kenai Spur from MP 0.0 to 14,0. Estimated project cost: $26.4 million (Phase I funding $13.8 million; Phase II - $12.6 million) F Funding Source: Chapter 107/83 $200,000 for a Oeslgn �¢ and Location Study. } 19 Kingsley/Oilwell Road (SR 1134001 DOT&PF 1983 KRTS Project Proposal: Complete paving. Project Status: Project completed in 1982. ♦Funding Source: Chapter 10/03 - $4009000 for construction. ' • t�.�S ,'j.. 1 Ylr�lt•♦I :int-1: i Tt:: Ir ' Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria Fiscal Year 1967 III. 2 Ql. Does the project extend -the service life of the facility? Service life a design life of facility. Extended service life in years Yes + Or g nal design 11ce in years x 25 a Score No • 0 Assumptions: Any work to be done to an existing facility potentially qualifies. This item is intended to reward projects which protect the State's investment in the existing system. 02. Will the project complete funding for an active incomplete or underfunded aroiect?.,� Pop -of 'G'"'w- "0t'a;Q _ a,,..f Ift . &.S. Yes v 15 No ■ 0 Assumptions: This item is intended to reward supplemental requests included in the capital budget, subsequent phases of previously phased projects do not qualify. Q3. Will the completion of this.project result in new post construction jobs? Yes v Number of iobs Project cost x 1,000,000 a score Noa0 Assumptions This item is intended to reward projects that result ipactual post -construction economic development* 04. Will Monitions or contract cost equivalents need to be adS1e s a result of this project? s , A��care this item from 0 - 15 wheres positions ■ 15 More than 3 positions 0 Assum tionss This item is intended to reward projects which minimize the Department's maintenance obligation. L:Y,.., n ,. .. , ... ... .. 07, .i .. 4 . .. _� L y'.._ F W 2. Follow-up construction project phasing. For example Phase II of Sterling Highway from Sterling to Soldotna (adding two lanes) would not be considered completing Phase I the realignment of the existing 2 lanes. They would be treated as separate projects. 0 points u t 3. Construction funding for a completed design or design and location study. points. , ��o sGe//��T ae Co/plp� �7C D So 7' Alep pRO Tri�L 7 /S f o#J7S n 4. Construction funding following ROW acquisition and utility location. 15 points. Q3. Will the completion of this project result in new post construction jobs? Interpretation: 1. Highways 2. Airports .0-p� O •/O PD/Ny's a 3. Harbors 0-10 points Q4. Will MAO position or contract cost equivalents need to be added as a result of this project? -•-- =- '" Interpretation: No refinement. A ,,_ ,�• n mf �'_ i Ap P 'y Q6. Impact on local job Market? n „ Interpretation: No refinement. Q6. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional, or r- statewide planning processes? �. Interpretation: No refinement. Q7. Will project address a safety hazard? • � y .. .... use. Interpretation: No refinement. Q8. Project leveraging capability? y 'A 4 F9o,Ys III`"'" 41r Interpretation: 1. Federal aid projects greater than $10.0 million. _ 100 points. v LF o�, IICZ;�rp 2. Federal aid projects less than $10.0 million. 000 !O Points assigned according to formula. 1,004 � o Al 3. Local communities participation. 26 points. 10 Q9. Project benefit cost scores? Interpretation: No refinement. P l r. �p`PN Q10. What is this project' s nagionai priority? Interpretation: 1. Statet0dr-oNNcern YWCA+' 2.oaaL•cepse�n 3. L:ocaLconcern points � 25 p is � [ 15 points 7 points Q11. Does the project substantially improve the ability of the facility to support the modal system of which it is a part? Y� • Interpretation: 1. Statewide concern (interstate highways, regional " center airports, regional ports). 15 points 2. Regional concerns (primary and major secondary F • roads, district and community airports, sub -regional harbors). 50 points 3. Local concern (low volume secondary and local roads, local airports, local harbors). 25 points. Q12. Does this project address a capacity problem? Interpretation: No refinement. .y��� L �: '��J... ✓J%l.fi.'�. [ _ � � � 'i'ip1'Y' ,/• 1 .,..s•,- � �r :' .'.r-J..,,' ,, TR-1�4 � _ _ _ h': .r �•4 jyi'•'. _... F-�.f Vi/if:FL. J.:•=N.:rcyr'.rLi.�..d +�9iG.il�gt.s..�. L•. y! .. ' l � # .. �- F J - - •--�.--:�-���::-war --.. , w ' Projects By Mode Highways_ AgenF1 Priority Sterling Highway MP 79-94 Construct Improved 2 lanes 0OT&PF 610 } v .Kenai Spur Widening Phase I OOT&PF .f .470-370 Seward Highway MP 50-65.5 (Summit Lake -Bertha Creek) DOT&PF 470 4A Kenai Spur Widening Phase 11. OOT&PF ',M74456'00010 Sterling Highway MP 157-174 (Anchor River -Homer) OOT&PF 430 .---- =- .,tom. (Resurface, minor widening, etc.)' Sterling Highway/Homer Spit Storm Damage Control DOT&PF 430 Sterling Highway MP 36-60 Major Realignment DOT&PF 420 Sterling Highway MP 79-94 Phase II (additional 2 lanes) DOT&PF 400 ' Sterling Highway MP 137-147 Overlay and Minor Widening DOT&PF.:..: 390 • 'Kalifonsky Beach Road Widening (to Kenai) Soldotna '-385 x i Sterling Highway MP 117-137 (Clam Gulch-Ninilchik) DOT&PF 360 (Minor widening, reconstruct, resurface)' Sterling Highway MP 0.0-28 (Seward -Moose Pass) OOT&PF 360 (Overlay and minor reconstruction) �- • Sterling Highway/Kenai Spur Signalization QOT&PF•'x 875 : Binkley and Sterling Highway Signalization DOT&PF 370 Kschemek Drive - Reconstruct and paving DOT&PF 363 -- - - East Hill Road - Phase II paving DOT&PF 350 ,9 KPB Highway Design Fund (450.0) KPB 345 A Sterling Highway/Kenai River Bridge Widening (Soldotna) Soldotna 345 Relocation of DOT&PF Soldotna M&O Station Soldotna 335 r Homer Bypass - Overlay and Illumination DOT&PF 330 b North Fork Road (4,500.0) KPB 326 Mackey Lake Road/Sterling Highway Intersection Improvement Soldotna 320 ;, :` """ ' Lake Street - 4-lane and pedestrian walkways Homer 320 Nash Road/Seward Highway Intersection.Improvement DOT&PF 320 M Bartlett Street - Upgrade to Urban Standards Kenai. Spur/Airport Way Intersection Signalization Homer 310 ' O.TAP.F. 1p-r- 310r-4OIS' - e North Kenai Road Four Lanes NAP 14-22 �OT&PF Pf ' 308 East End Road MP 1.0 Reconstruction and Realignment DOT&PF 303 ♦y Redoubt Avenue/Forest Drive - Reconstruction and Paving �DOTVF W. me.400 •' Robinson Loop Road Reconstruction and Paving KPB 297 Diamond Ridge MP 4.83-8.02 Reconstruction and Paving KPB 297- East End Road Phase II MP 12.3-20.19 Paving KPB 295- _ Relocate DOT&PF Seward M&O Station Seward 295 L,. 9Fl 1�. East End Road Phase III MP 12.3-21.23 Realign and Paving DOT&Pf 295 - �' -' - East End Road - Widen to 4-lanes within City limits Homer 287 Sport Lake Road Reconstruction and Paving KPB 287 Seldovia Airport Road - Widen and Pave Seldovia 985 Vest Poppy Lane Reconstruction and Paving KPB 282 -. Funny River Road - Sterling to Airport Major Reconstrction DOT&PF 265 4 Russian Villae - Upgrade Road, Spot Reconstruction DOT&PF 247 t Gravel Entire Route Pedestrian Bridges - Seward Highway/Resurrection River OOT&PF 230 e.`r Sterling Highway MP 134 137 Pedestrian Pathways, Safety DOT&PF 226 Improvements, Pedestrian Access to Ninilchik/Deep Creek Receational Areas. Skyline Drive (Soldotna area) Reconstruction and Paving KPB 222 Resurrection River Road Upgrade (Non -Federal Aid) Seward 205 • •�,L,[ ,:i 1 .. ' / -t: )' ' ', r [,. V•r. •.l:�rt'-\ %• :iY•..�• . 4 p ',Mi•"t•�'A.r''61, 'i+ 't'� �[,yr,. ., p\, •f A. ,`• i]]t•!i..i. � •,� .,� ilr5t;:vi' :,. ...Ii r•y•da`.4''''i;U%.\• of?.•,.:LfG• s•7 r a.• 1' h , :!� •r id: Z.' • y r'� t',r, � S �. h i d •i 4 tiY n t I "'' .. (� - ^�� s r Hi_ ghways �Bean Creek Road Reconstruction, Gravel Surfacing, Extension 'Ime. Agency Priority KPB 187 Funny River Road - Airport to FOR Gravel Overlay DOT&PF 187 Scout Lake Road - Reconstruction and Paving DOT&PF 172 Lowell Point Road Upgrade Seward 152 Greer Road KPB 137 Kenai River Crossing at Funny River Road DOT&PF.,.r110 v Kenai Bypass -New Construction .%T^..107. k a - ,1�:,- k . Ai„ rports Agency Priority Homer Airport Runway, Taxiway resurfacing DOT&PF 360 © T Seward Airport - GA Apron Expansion and Other Improvements DOT&PF 288 - English Bay Runway Erosion Protection DOT&PF 265 Homer Airport Property Acquisition DOT&PF 260 Soldotne Airport Terminal Replacement Soldotna 227 'Iei)oi_ji rpor�; :::F1 oat.. P1 ane Ba#Q, o Marine Agency Priority ...::u`. Homer Harbor Main Dock Repairs Homer 353 Homer Barge Facility Homer 325 Ninilchlk Harbor Improvements OOT&PF 320 Seward Downtown Ferry and Cruise Ship Dock (Design) Seward 305 f Kasilof Harbor Improvements (Float replacement, dock DOT&PF 287 repair, additional floats, that ramp replacement) Homer Harbor Float Expansion Homer 280 Seldovia SBH - Replacement 300-400' of floats DOT&PF 260 Nash Road SBH New ..Const�ructi,gqn� Seward 4 '160 .Dock' N�ili"Tonst'rucTn' A6WA: X#AT* +a FAasny dna j4dAT �►ar sty Seldova City Dock - Repairs To Existing Dock Structure DOT&PF 220 Seward Marine Industrial Center (Cradles & Rail Extension) Seward 220 Jakolof Harbor - Float Improvements and ROW DOT&PF 212 Seldovia Ferry Terminal (Shuttle Ferry) Seldovia 125 . Seldovia Harbor Erosion Control Seldovia 45 :•......�'. •Jt+ rn _ f..l+ , . 1%t,S }(• r.l it. , r+',+ik 1' J,.. •J°_ -+' iti_.ff{�' i - , �:'�i l:lve. l•••: L' �T +I:j.,•.j. •`R Nil; i•iit•34T �'9-ti �f r�•+,j:i :whi�,• `'fx •�. T- ii�► 'fir': "' �V• ' r' 'fit '1 jF"-. .A a Capital Budget •�. Project Ranking Criteria+© Fiscal Year 1987 Q G _ PROJECT TME: r --= Ql. Does the project extend the service life of the facility'? u Q2. Will the project complete funding for an active incomplete or underfunded project? -' �' a ` •d Q3. Wi11•the completion of this project result in new post - - -- --- construction jobs? u' - r 44. Will M60 positions or contract cost equivalents need to be =:b ' • added as a result of this project? Q5. •Impact on local job market? /s QG. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional or statewide planning processes? --: Q7. Will the project address a safety hazard? 48. Project leveraging capability? 49 Project Benefit/Cost Score • ; •err, :'� .-_•-' - �� Q10. What is this Project's regional priority? _ � _- ". ;,Y .; Q1 1. Does the project substantially improve the ability of,the ;•' <,:, r: _-� • .facility to support the modal system of which it is a part? . �c'.��.,�,. -�1. ,'vd' .'e" ;,_ ,.•-1.s.'.i•:- - ;y ;. .•'.,•- j _• ,r • '�:`,•„�•�.:,.'• 'e;<:•'��..M�•�ir{;•�f�:!iri1L:.i�` 3 i+,-ni =- FX '•'�.>` :{'fie _ .,• _ `��,• L .1... ".�j ... •j' - r• :. •' / r••S ily .. 'd. t -J:. �{r •Jft � ti L•,i.h -i. .{t.�. j ,i!ao ✓., 9 ,�jh•,: 1.•1dT;Y•.+'� _er• t•t:A" i;r �r , � 1'f',: tt • - - - .•� A tf t} to' •v . il'3 fLd1DV,W,1y�i.Clir ;,. .. y►ti'.�Q: f.t1� I 1. 3•r, :c.r Y :1 �%:i .a <'� • r•.i tH;.4 AR Ri a»:2. 1�.., - - . o .� t. u:• �•?iF •'E`�' t ;�'tn . car' Lu i caps tal Budget Project Ranking Criteria �• Fiscal Year 1987• Q12. Does this project address a capacity problem? Kit Q13. Does the facility related to the project meet identified ''' •.�� standards for such a facility? /00 �07711�4�/ SvBSTAMQR{� � 'i �0-4sz S, .• 7 Ave it 76. Q14. Does this protect respond to a project or program specific '' .n''s statutory or regulatory requirement? " : �•;.s.;;a:� .. f'fri�') fin•:' ' . it �:•' ': .. '�.��' TOTAL 7 t•Y-41 Er. m7, .E 7ei0% vl: •«<� rsl ... � `'�`. .,�r•?::�, ,�..'I •.. .,fit .• .. • . •• :, 9• ti:�i I f • .iq 1 .a'1 •tt:i^m ',.' re i'Tor: 1,0,611 1'.ry40vq.•i :•�F u 'r\1 7( P� +l:tt9itl �5�1;btp•'.�if,� S'�t+•�y�i �'�itS ;�r� _-,�7','7s.. ._• .... .. .�� •. - � r•� "• .•wr►•• ' 1 y rT-•.. ��'� y',�. {�{�Y-.j ` f i,hrt; ?� ��'� %� 'e r231Y e a::.: �.-•�'•!P• •�`.�•' • , 'n�'•;•{.r• •,.' ..-. l.:Jf„�� 3 np Mr � '�f;r.•r''r" .• ,•w try • .•yf�h,. i, ��frd 1}4' :,' • .� i}sl��...r�tl31��Y(/��t4•f�'�,!ihaw: '1.�.,, �,k1:f •• {, •"4i}N'.11.: .�.'y *`4'T �.,,�� 1'��•r .�••�,'.i!'I..'. •'.1�..•.,��I�JS'� ;f•r S(._''T�/� $1','YL _.lets::ia":,.....: t:�ak:�:!-s. ':'�....... �': i ,s 4,ivy; �1'.%�rfi :".cfl�:2S�'i `i�t s��, ` �i7 ::�:G�`,• .3. - C•1- L*M Capital Budget 'SRO Project Ranking Cri teri a Fiscal Year 1987 CC PROJECT TITLE: ,,...w:�A/.r %/i�i�nieA �/IOJGOf 41. Does the project extend the service life of the facility? F_ QL Vill the project complete funding for an active incomplete e 4r underfunded project? ; ...om 1 i • :., . ; ,,: .r� ' • . -- ; -, - �-- ----- -- ----- Q8 Will the c pet on of this project result in new post . �. construction jobs? •' Q4. Will NO positions or contract cost equivalents need to be • added as a result of this project? Ar Q5. Impact on local job market? QG. is the project identified as a need by local, regional or statewide planning processes? r`., i 47. Will the project address a safety hazard?,': ro QB. Project leveraging capability? Q9. Project Benefit/Cost Score • �• a .." •-• -- ,"-�. �:� •T---.�:r Q10 What is this project's regional priority? Qil. Does the project substantially improve the abilof •the factitty to support the modal system of which it •iity s a part? fir,.. -' ._ Mpers�r , • !!',�tAfF�t . • � w'r _. IAi tGs«j � ��J''I)' ; •`, .; ••*1 -:, :n� ::.::: al NAM sV•` A,.iL ., ,'. ..' Y'(,..:'r • .- �`t • VI ''`ii ti". ,- . -s, �. ...s, •••.;., ..•ybjr�9��' ••,. ..rc�;,�4'..'-;ar:',' ��a r;Z�r• r i _ i. t•v :, �" :.n„' �, .., i•�., aT. ibt t'��x, ,f. �•'. •.:?e 1�e h}. '• '?7 1 1 i. .:,r. z',c v r ' , 6 �p ; 1,1p; ;� ' ': �. C,.e D!;' ,;t �:�•4%a' i :.•i;' : ' tr,A ' r . ,,�''•f :i ;;L* n i • ,.,lr , '. ..FTAi R! :y' . i f b'.A y/} , ji i " ,t ..F. tY n•• 'it•''Y' •' r e iAk- 4. Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria, .. Fiscal Year 1987 012. Does this project address a capacity problem? so 013. Does the facility related to the project meet identified " standards for such a faciliv? 00 7OmecY Sag S'rA N ARH� Q14. Does this project respond to a project or program specific statutory or regulatory requirement? TOTAL �� O .... ~.".... .� :.•�:."+. '/: ,. i J;,t:'+.: .tit V f Itdt,v f :'.,•;,���/., ± Yw,r4p•►*�• . •;lip rf•i, •:_ ... •d.:...� -g"riI'f: ?if,. ':` i•��J1drt ��i:/t!t'+`! .'.pp r;:�'".t�l''� _ I.tt�`d, . � � .1, a ►.' .. S.a ., ....-'" ir'.. .. ..a..... 1 , l'1lt ily�t(1i1��" e•1::T.t• •i1W FS�1�': :{ilk tali:• a�.tu -s.^ �;�_sd�__'� . .. » ,...� .. .. .1 �� +'.• � • '.1::„ .;�'yT'► : �• aR• '� �r ;'" ; «y yti�l�r '!1;1t11. ,' ,n• 1ir`. r.'• . �•� e'' `' _`�'� • �+ .4n x : ii of �; �� ^,•tl';.,�?ty� 1�i«fffiCf'IC! 'f a�1�f;►'I(i 'etts.';tovt, , its+ amp *~!'' .. .rl,,� '. •ii •tlai+iw 7a �S�. d�;Y �'&i3ri�lr'��t�:;,�J'�Cst�Ais; '�gt'',y{, 1'!�t'�G1`''.4..... .,, • b: y �; r • .',.�,, - ' ,:I ,�!-� 3it-It ',� c.el••,,.,. ' y 'j ,'� N' .'1 �'�'! �/. ry?ID�'�� .� , �x• ,� Y�4 +J• — L�',��i" :d �• '•.71i 'L^r.'l f cJ ••�...,' t:.il, , t I, n i i.S + • y �' '•1'f �t`i,-!�'.�. f�! f}' 'i+' _Q..-?i..•-..Gt?' 'r. a ILfl+i1; L.:.. _. _+cA' . . - . ,. �1_ .. •.,t •. ..a : ' � -,'.:: i � : l.., ..+i►. _ _J..e l.r�.9i:..n rr w .t+b� s.l _ c..�;%�7oaY.%. hSGli"l'B���I�i�� ,;�•••. r*�yx_ III t■ Capital Bud at ' Project Ranking Cri teri a �o Fiscal Year 1987 Cf PROJECT TITLES 1,05ow, Ql. Does the project extend the service life of the faeility4 42. Will the project'coriplete funding for an active ineomplete or underfunded project? • ;, -. h, - Q8. Will the completion of this project result in now post construction jobs? Q4. Will INTO positions or contract cost equivalents need to be r added as a result of this project? QS. Impact on local job market? —�---- � Q6. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional or statewide planning processes? �•r Q7. Will the project address a safety hazard? 8 48. Project 1 everagi ng capability? +� /I w o7r .¢ A o r o f 49. Project Benefit/Cost Score 410. What is this project's regional priority? rw Now ' Goa 6 ro.V cvb P/ eru A � R Po tT way ' e1UW1ZIV COP-r $Q W/p0APAVII 7 ANI I�ATOP . , �MOxe�r�' p7S y Q11. Does the project substantially improve the ability ofthe '`•"`'' ' '" facility to support the modal system of which it is a �.. part? Govrur ,.'.. •• ;. _• ,Q �' rye; ; _:r -_ �S•j •.• :" n f.. t : ���..'- td w :? 4 .7 f+}},,y;! +as '•' •°.^w..R• ;'• ,i�.rp�.. ��1•.. •l.•;1•/ !. - }t�� y,.M � ff.ii7 tY..i:r�" ..r I +cif ��1�• y w' .a if�,:. f��'1�t f '`�. 't►. r :. h' 1: 'r ... "•�,' ,: • y!;�I��• �':t4•�.' ^;,4'r,, .i'r, i�+•4iv1?f?ST�Q:.J f'r.�.i:'3'�t!•:+i•(y��j •;1•�'�i"��•i: ;'f�•:� r, •f }/ •{. Y•1f1'.'r + ,yam . .. 1 a�''_ •_-` F': ANN F Capital Bud et ' .. Project Ranking Criteria' • Fiscal Year 1997 QIZ. Does this project address a capacity problem? Yes Tie.! Flate. • a:6642T AT 'nr<<,s lN� ' h/�rry .tie to ee *A► a s r,tue t+i�r A- A w' ,* y /r- w 0" ass �weRe�gs�d. C4"0 PAe .: y i� wiv y S�� rvtc is aeree�s Q13. Ooes the facility related to the roject meet identified p ' standards for such a facility? , •:.� ,«: �n _ " " /oo — Terg"Y seessn&dwkb A'�r • �s — Rvv�2 7S Q14.,•.Ooes this project respond to a project or program specific Statutory or regulatory requirement? 1:)41 a+: y ' own TOTAL .. .. ... «., is •�� �•::a;� i,� ..TL �:• •�a., : � . ,,,,�...:...., G` JS*Z ['•:'[4•rq•Yiti: d },Cw 1 %� ". C°f'i r( .1�!IiJ..aTiy 4'A•,. i' ^ . �►,.M t y .,.� .:ti..:: t�". .. •tA�w t'iw:`Cti.�w ! � N�••. M 9 rr:., . .y . •N• 41 . i'«w'N.•, ••,. .• ..•�•, �� �'.', �! i�I�,,\ 0. i1 •, .•Li` ••� �� � .. _ qi •;ry Y:� i•tt•dh orb Gvctic:a.i .Yliti't�.auf. �t;4;'3a �st�q �1�` .�ii `�•�l' ... •� �o : z .: �. •• •'�'tb%� 1, :tl sf. l�: ifokl In .4102.(2„ UISOM "e.; .4.04,444 0J,.,1jS'R. 1 .• ,_ !>. kqN ` r•, «..:a.�......,�••.,�... ' zw •i4�t!y�,r:TWO, ,rj•:M..-,, 4t'a;•;,3n;�,r IVU..,�gtL'y�►$r/��..�r�' •,a..1•.•°��:.e�.3:•`��t.'_•�;�4� �: r.,.ir.'�! ,ti 161`Y'. S.I., T'7i�:!T;Y�!!i'�!T-.�1•�<ii� . u!-ltl'�i,Tk�'�'_�?:S:i i. �`.I{'X•�:9��iwY.. ._i.. t::r:'IR6Z{::.IT' ,f -�•t- - -. r�•;i+e'_'� V R e PROJECT TITLE: 41. Does the project extend the service life of the facility? Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria Fiscal Year 1987 Q2. Will the project complete funding for an active Incomplete or underfunded project? AMWAMI : 1b MW7N AMA01A6 S7'AV ' DC:svtN AM49*04rcig w,yd3a A:o*d WAS AAvCA . -�yI �JP,o?rEaT 4r�i� NeT Coat/r�Qf'�0 /�oPc'R�Jr - vsf rr WAS v vioaR PuAuOEp. Tine So,*a� wAS AMOAT • eveA /CVO if spar AW6A us,& NOT' E/Veva ov4s 93. Will the completion of this project result in new post �i'a��ove construction jobs? . • ! . ' • ' " Q4. Will PAO positions or contract cost equivalents need to be —"— ���, , added as a result of this project? f Q5. Impact on local job market? -- /a Q6. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional or statewide planning processes? A 47. Will the project add ess a safe hazard? Roli0 A~.Vrty 41 APOA ueot�wo oo h►�r er OA ` Ns AS o.,rtNea.' A Oe. a Avow 3 K - f3/86 ' Q8. os AP ever rwre YeAA o� dos. Project leveraging capability? ors Afpod MoMAM Q9. Project Benefit/Cost Score —� Q10. What is this project's regional priority? /¢ -7,1 P OFAe i• vie -- A0C..4 ,D AN614%pUS. 411. Does the project substantially improve the ability of the . facility to support the modal system of which it is a part?, i ... .� t'1- rw t t- . - n 4 • '•. R t •. � ' w /W. ^^..:... .e,.vt. t•�� 'E4 • f1i'�• w1/�fitEr t Yj+°} 1• �[� '' ' : .,'y �.: t•. •. tin �. ty � �.. u.i�.1��t", �t� }} V *'4 :����� E�• 'rF�F� i9k�t:T�`�Wiz.R.. .... ..'`S. .t t1�.9rll�e.•.ti�,•i., ,• .....»n..., � n•4ti+w.,"•,>•1.i5R.4.v"!.+''lrt Y_ _s: .c. Capital Budget Project Ranking CMteria' • Fiscal Year 1987 Q12. Does this project address a capacity problem? - . ' .cow -y►� Q13. Does the facility related to the project meet identified standards for such a facility? &rrovoor A tbovdtNT ".�0'1'�1c�lf saess�woA�•o �S it �W*3 too' s vasr _ _. .., d8.e44var ego �; �;�• .,T Q14. Does this project respond to a roject.. or..°�o,.,� =£ statutory or regulatory requirement? am specific irTOTAL 30 O _ .._....._. ;�� _ .:;:,j: '•. � �?:`:l. ZJ'�tT.J'•c. . • .`•fit - • ••.n....°�. ...�. '.p. •,' �..t": .A, y'1 r,., /`! iP�i�l ti'�!ii.�i C{�i {�i i/�•I"h•2•��'. .. :j",•f»: .^ psi ��• �' a �, ,S � •:•', S,'./• a • •"�* ~ .. a ;f '�' IV oR4 .....,.. ... �' y� • t ... ..t � �' i.•.::atJ't i I.i :1 '• � j)'iQ �" �;�� i .'c � •� I�i�IA .:I lip '.• .. , ��.:,�r •� ',� . ..... �..w.., � 1 ,'• � : y, , ••w•- ..j . • •� .�, � �.') '!Y'1/•t '�ti �� . .nwM l�j 1 i•... � � � •, _ - � ��3. �_: � ... j� tr» f "1't�l. ' 1tt!7 ' �1!+'1't'!r.. v f'.� f f:!'f::?�,11�r" 'l{i•("a�s'!�iQYf,� :Aj�3 : nj��(j},.�,�t;�� � � _ �:r� a� - -•- •- • �..i ' ,1• i` r Ilk rl t .. /, let, i:+ i ` `"'+�a"1� �''n :.� l�� 1 �i!' 7,• �I•, . , ' . G gjf:'"i ,1, . . �. , � .�,•,tn �. • ,.�j�,.,�� ifj;} �.>�� ic! , . •...� �.� 61� sir. A. i. 't-P,�'•_- f�. '14. ��•, M 1 ,a•j: � .: 1•P•M '� • ��• :,.. .:' • 'iylt'41�ti' ;��9�. ... .•.•`r �•1 IN f�6Y�i,� 1 ^ l�� {,;i .. f�• r.�.:L iviF{ tal" 7"�ry �41 - �. - _— .—. .- ,.-YET. - + - - • - . .. .. �" — . _._ .. - .. • TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE 0CaMRED ON FOREST DRIVE 1983 ',,,OgE NO. DATE TACAT_ �1 IN�JtHtIES CAE C�83-'-337�61 2-25-83 Forest & Spur 0 PH after stop � 83-33803 3-1-83 Forest & 3rd 0 DWI/Assault 4th . 83-36076 8-20-83 Forest & Spur 0 M after stop ' 83-36113 8-23-83 Forest & 4th b MC can into back of } 83-36663 10-16-83 Forest & Spur 0 Tire blew out on ' veh. 1984 ; 84-37930 2-22-84 Forest & 5th 0 Basic speed - --- - - 64-38911 5-5-H Forest & 5th 0 DWI 84-40506 8-3-M Forest & Spur 0 F19f after stop 84-42141 11-16-M Forest & 5th 1 Neg. Driving 84-42433 12-12-84 Forest & 5th 0 M after atop 84-42570 12-24-84 Forest & Spur 0 M after stop " 84-42655 12-31-84 Forest & Spur 0 Hit & Run - 11985 85-42718 1-5-85 Forest & Spur 0 Basic speed 4 3419 3-7-85 Forest & Spur 1 PH after stop (`5-44524 5-31-85 Forest Drive 0 Hit & Run 0545471 7-27-85 Forest & Spur 3 EW after stop 65-47234 11-18-85 Forest & Spur 0 Basic speed 85-47236 11-18-85 Forest & Spur 0 F'19t after stop 6 1986 - 86-47833 1-4-86 Forest & Spur 0 Subjects left scene +, .�ii .fi .t: ::y;' ':�'• .;�il•I• •P•, �. <'•, t4••P��',A i`,,i:`•jb'1?I',�a k „=. .;j11"` t', PI,•..-`..{i'i: y•'��1 .� '• .1 a'••;±',t�,_.t ,. u '. .rD`+'u'i..t%..� •rar. .;.�. ..a }. 1 'I N� a.ik. � .-+ . ��aL' �1', �}�'tp'i%r.�d '.<<..{ F, .�, ,�.1,•,I-:r�}�':>'r.�;•.'=l•�,�p'}r..,�.,�c,• trstf►'�7 }. �'� �, �� ��_. 7i' ; .. '�,:"' r if''.a ; . tia -T �- V7 ."{. i'�^'.:',..• pty, 1.;., �.." w '.jy3 S ✓ v.. ;.. rf 7jt ' a v 4/tetf��%4 ,.t "T J.1�•;gf1+{'lf•F� }r }ufei:'.1<ir :t+� .�'i`J'' � IJj+{A..r�� �i � . r ' •• il` Y n - ,fn` �w�tl1-M�t1.M111 ,+'•'�:,It �'Y4�r .,« ;, -•.�yf i�`•. o A Capital Budget A Project Ranking Criteria I'r Fiscal Year 1987 • y6s I PROJECT TITLE: /T���/ r f • _PhOi • L!%1/�/ba� it/�,Od� �"'�d/ ��yC �dJJh 01. Does the project extend the service life of the facility? 4X41 P"e"6 FtoA7• /s sNE BAS %AP - bA+eer osEa ♦ 04C Tv 66' CLOSFa bu6c 7v 7► &jff k. Nos QE ♦w s .►,Ot a ro SF E &*A�°�=• as— S 00 JQ/reE . JiWCOM ar Boer 10 0t wit ` oAf N vP 1J.A q2. Will the project complete funding for an active incomplete AEI or underfunded project? . V� le, i i �tArV AA/O ' OE''�♦dN � �Sr�AY s�t.� EXis riNG tsoA r Pt� E B�4� ��v rte Be teo.v veA.T�.� Q3. Mill the completion of this project result in new post =��� eonstructi on jobs? YES — AVO Ny ,vew V10 B s — PoefvAW G U I D I N G SQA w e eS, F1ve�G.�uG R�°'PA� Je �l 3Eie viol 804010WOP4 of eAfA^ 7E2 MreeVleft, 4970 .••• ' •• LGOK iN6 AT epO t /VLKNES . ID •Q4. Will NO positions or contract cost equivalents need to be added as a result of this project? 4Lr`•�, "45. impact on local job market? QG. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional or ; statewide planning processes? Q7. Will the project address a safety hazard? TVre& ♦a Alt o%N FWOA♦e• AAO-4 T PArAAvC a,4540N O.v ♦"sysw, srs* Th �eJveH, w✓ "' ' rovao 6 NO Vevera;ffii GNA•� ♦Ic k+E AY.r4 F•/�B . ..:.- . . % �r A'a�t rvoT �00 r �Add`AProjeectr capability? c it t ^4p_r/e iPwre@AJ • WE. Q9. Project Benefit/Cost Score 4 -- Q10. What i is project's regional pri rity? — --a �• L oaA•C. ,fXi�N � • ,. - 0)1. oes oe o ect substantially impro a the *ability of -the = • •r.. ••► ,�, : �� =;� facil i ty to support the modal system of which it i a a part? /1010 Q' wi • f*� {r• f,: e:.. tq. ••�.;. •• ;:. �i's1i• iw:`1Ct"SV�N:Y �'�• —_�. T J •i�V•t''•°4£j / ... ��.. r . Bi4CiN .,'!i` .p!1 %.��O��L t�`:�i¢ j t.rr •. i;?'Z' .1X.py f"! a{{��y,,y�i _ •y. •'{{,`' ,. �•'..-i.(;'.,, e.3. r=�140 I�f�'%�•..{ `,�,�dt'. '�li' .w!'�Y• i 'cd.F.;yr, • Y� t�ir.< *eY.ti W_cl ,: �'° '.:} .i(•rk+Sf:•.l .. , i''4'•i:1 F. . A �� , w'%�'1 � !d '?t l� •.1t)�,t�@ril :cif .�id3:l�lif_i � _.. , L L off" w 1 Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria Fiscal Year 1997 f •, 413. , Does the facility related to the project Y t ' ; t �, - standards for such a facili� P j meet Identified .. ,.. rt1s7--?A*s FLow•r- ,PA NO 4460AP is '?bsAet Sy 6 Svra�asRRD .. 'OrMAT �s' 't.+w Y ..Fir A- &tee Q14. Ooes this project respond to a project or program specific nj M% X.----__: - •---- =�; statutory or regulatory requirement? ...«... « '•f.'., : : is � .. 1:;, ;! ,il.jsj l�'.i;i { .Mr;t• tic. .... R .... -_ • '" •' '.. . TOTAL~ f '. •. . •., . .��.+: S r:' • • �•.':. .'.'�L . •w;1'M :+'ice .��,�: , �f, . -. � � rf , :. :... '� a %� • _ 'f�.••. i +.:15.e.ai•.', 'M!.•4.Y• !YyfR•"'bl;,r.��4. o a ese - • ' � ,� ' },w `• .v f�•"�' �.'br4•� •:7•'�, :..• �.'!�''•i•.ib' {.i5'. L�.J•t t•yi.. �:briL�d:Y. W, ... .: ... � .�.? �.,.,...� rrl;�;:�'xt: y•�val::r;�t. .gip, •' - • 10+ ,- �. rr.r .. , . • r• j �,, .��' f1:�: r/'i 't.!' C-!Q �� 1. i J., ..r ... If-••U I ,� ... • � ~ RIB r i., •f� • •h. r ��.. .� 1 i".. . ��a+!r, , ...,'.,• ,_,'' � •,,�,. ., - „', •+r` " :iC.f .,, n,:�.,t..,r� �!'':.t gtl �t1176' 1`�j,it�' al �4 rfl C�1 L.fn tern + • � , �� • • •� Ott,. �,,� .. . � . • 'LLi r. ' .. %• ��;.t ry. rY : %, {�1.�1 t+.•���.�' ;�'iq[��Qs "'.1t � �.: � I i Jh�1 . • • _ 'i• i ��;� �i, .o/�-- '•a ,r •y' 'a ".;" '.:1":. • "'� :i`":9 ii.:h \f..'" r, ,. �''•4yy: r,:, r 'c', • �.. �.�f , ;, ♦v:+w �A 1f"•I 7., I { • •t4 h" •,s • • ,' • �q '.f r''�:�-:iL:i!�.1:7��' 11 (1 �A �'! ' •�' }t . •'•` . { p�y1�`� :w f �! � _ } :1- .r. ,• i:,.�,.,�' ion% .V.a•'•:t. r.� a;±r + ,.Aw `•�'%' �'�'. �'9;t'C;�. � ,a�4�' ,(,,.u•,°�r� Via, er %'i r_:�z ?�, i��!4"��.,. t; '1 ..•s,',e' . •i i,n; . .�i � i 5+:�1, at.� • � � •��x�ICJ.Y,h .5.a~l}i �o }` 'i .� 1�,. �`. �(t�4�•..q 1'''.1 4�- "' ;:I'•.+F3 .+ •P� � k�„'�i,•���r �;..:1`��,j'��,s�1•�.rs{�i.f.7 a�Qjw,i�i;'.4���.�!•il.� Ft►'t.L�.�J. •e 1., � �.t'�f;SS Y,i �i� .,tr'Y�i2Si:"� 1•�� � .._ -Vf ��:__ , � o 012. Does this'project address a capacity problem? c� r. Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria Fiscal Year 1987 PROJECT TME: Z%Arfgld r4m 1 rY 01. Ooes the project extend the service life of the facility? A illf QL dill the project complete funding for an active incomplete r _ or underfunded project? Y". WE Ackovea oTAT,* GPA*.1r ' r 8S •g/i AD4 40 1j 000,t000 BNT TVAdi'" •.; ' WAS 474gp Ooo S,V*,ALor fLCsS TrYAw �epdOenrO•p TEtT � t co«� AsQ7•+s . Oiuooa Fo►,v0� •D - } :. � .. ,.: : Q3. Will the completion of this project result in new post pA07MT. construction jobs? ^4 pj NOw �aa a 5 . & , ^0611-1t 4 PAIVATE — Ft3Ni,uG, S*Ar RePA*AS = Fee& /N6� CA NNOMG). TJtUCk,#J& t?r • •••. 'V y� Q4. Will "SO positions or contract cost equivalents need to be added as a result of this project? <r O•we�w Pis�riecv _ _ - :� �ilip ppt�aT� FOre TNT' ?ti+►s0' y; _ - QS.. Impact on local job market? ; Q6. Is the project identified as a need by local, regional or statewide planning processes? w Q7. Will the project address a safety hazard?/00 - Qe. Project leveraging capability? -- -- -- Q9. Project Benefit/Cost Score tic ;5.'EO1S ' .• is this project's regional priority? loo . wt� yid iwr�e d . L.QG!1'� Pieioa,otry n =,- oGK 7,�tF � � Slaver o.0 7ikis 10it,�?GaT - .. `.. • � .'v- ' �L� _ .011. Does the project substantially improve the ability of -the facility to support the modal system of which it is a part? 1 . • ' f+!• •. r... ;.r.r;;t •s 1 Si.••, l a '.C�•;'.'f.:.Z.�,:ens y tip- � :� �.te -.' .. Y� 1 - .- ._ ., .. ' �+1OhlIIYtQr" /P. fr' � _=A�+tT,,,,�,,ei�'�w;►��,..`�'''��'1'�e.�r.��`,�`�t��'' -- - ; .. �� t • 7_c vtr . A •lrS;:$ii ..11lw)�' �I•'ti':ilt`i �"�:.• i+a w� _ !.!. � ' +•��-wxn � "s3��id . S�' r., a Capital Budget Project Ranking Criteria Fiscal Year 1997 412. Ooes this project address a capacity problem? Loo,� AT Twv . /Go ": OF '00*rs - .A.Iax4A OAO �Iri4R � .4e.& TiNCJC 4vo Ts 40-47W � �o t"tiE'c �Arsis. rr Titer �u►ers•: C�roe' Q13. Does the facility related to the project meet identified standards for such a facility? :- fOWCOG, &iry waw O'3 vcA-F- VoOO& = Bo v'PS , N i �i'/���wd ?Y!1►��y �71tAt�Y Sv8i7AN��=A •• ws�•w►ar � _ _ Q14. Does this project respond to a project or program specific statutory or regulatory requirement? .. a ' _ ... .. .. TOTAL Aft .71 j,j* • ;r yrr.. -.ii '.. t!'i:. •t '•: 1':�^. .!. r•.. �-',••yn.1•'1•t Aft<}U.".'•tYi:''{'•i.`9fiJ' • '<.+ --. - • '�• _ .+• �r' •3'� a..,.l• ;•t r• Vim..• _•ti��'. `, t;' .4nwi% t''• ':�.'••+. .�'r,.'.,,��, '•r,•, '_,, ,�.. •„ .4, - '1••.. 'w .5,,.. tit,,i'.i • .,•.�•.• 3% .I ry.. ...• x.�7i )%i. '• fir!! �'r,.•� ••. _ ti!•r :d'.(✓{yr,,•�;�tt .�t $ " A �.f:• Ii! '•.il. �K a t'.;'" .:' • ,,:� �!.'� : •a:� ��' � f. t' •' .) r'.• 1, •+� .'rL�{•+ /•,✓ r!' ¢�f" }.., � ,.� 1. id,y -" r i y• � �PV r•}''� ,W'�;.i:r� � :jti tr-�_`� - , - .cum• Komi Chamber of Commerce © Box 497 { Kenai. Alaska 99611 (907) 283-7989 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Rich Underkofler, City Manager/Soldotna Mr. Bill Brighton, City Manager/Kenai FROM: Sue Carter DATE: March 18, 1986 RE: ARCTIC WINTER GAMES - EXPENSES INCURRED FOR MULTI -IMAGE SHOW Please find attached an itemized accounting for all costs incurred in the preparation of the multi -image show which was to accompany the presentation for the bid on the 1988 Arctic Winter Games. The break -down is as follows: 0 Soldotna 1,095.50 Kenai 1,095.50 In addition, discussions have been held with Mr. Andrews of Eagle Eye Visions relative to his preparing a similar program that would modify and expand the multi -image show to promote the Kenai-Soldota areas. Mr. Andrews would proceed with expansion of the current slide presentation plus prepare It so that it could be transferred to video tape for ease in showing, etc. His break -down of costs, etc. is also enclosed for your consideration. We would be hopeful that both cities might allocate additional funds so that we could proceed with this promotional package that could be utilized for "trave, shows", City Manager meetings, convention bids, etc. Please advise if additional information is required. Thank you for your Support in our efforts in the Arctic Winter Games and all of us Involved :a the project are certain that there will be many more like proposals ahead.chai we Shall participate in and be successful in our efforts. ., Thank you! XSue CC: "Mr. Robert Williams, Kenai Visitors b Convention Bureau 0 Mr. Larry Gossman, Soldotna Chamber of Commerce NMI Please maim ebacks payable to "Bagia Vision" mail .90 P.O.� bye � �iri�'.Y,.z=r.Y:'"�lwi�_ ��a�4� eeK17 _ _ ..• c :.. - _.•...ctit�itvl • .-...rb..�,w•us,.r:�i EAGLE =_: - : �•�.: _:- L_e EYE r.• MOTC iR~ AND MULT14MAGE PRMIATONS ' L .� P.O. Box 4550 Kenai, Alaska 99611 March 13,' 1986 E(PENSES INCURRED PRODUCING MULTI-DRGE SWI for 1988 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES (120 slides ..... 12 minute show) PHMIOGRAPHY DONE SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS S01.............$300 ME SLIDES $ SPECLAL EFFECTS SLIDES....................$211 ® USE OF PERSONAL SLIDES INCLUDING r DUPLICATION RIGHTS Aim OOSTS...•......... $600 MUSIC PRODUCTION ON 2-TRACK TAPE ........................$1S0 LABOR TIME IN PRODUCTION (31 hours 0 $30 hour) .......... $930 1b►TAL:...........$2191 C j o. ,T+ l 1 . MULTI -IMAGE PRESENTATION .. ***1988 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES*** DESCRIPTION OF SLIDE NARRATION IA: TITLE SLIDE 111988 Arctic Winter Games" 1B: INLAP OF ALASKA, WWN L1: AR'. NCKINLEY ZB: BIRCH FOREST IN FALL 3A: OVERVIEW OF ANCHORAGE ao 3B: OVERVIEW OF KETCHIC%N 4A: VIEW OF LOrW FJORDS ifi • :i 4B: SIIOiLEM OF OIL MLPAW IN OPERATION -= J SA: EAGEN CONVENTION CEWM = • N SB: RUSTIC CABIN AND CACLM GA: NATIVE ESKDVS , ¢° 6B• TRADITIONAL BLANKET TOSS ' 7A: IDITAROD BUTTON (CLOSE-UP) '. - - -- --- - _-A- 7B: IDITAROD RACE DOWN 4th STREET BA: OUTLINE OF KEMI PENINSULA 8B: TITLE SLIDE: 'THE KENAI" (OVER 'LOOP OF 8A) t.� x . !As •.*t .. •r • a� ' •r ; err `•�{.._ �`.. t , � '.i':;,.�r. ';{:L:::S:'.::;,:. .':�'.`+:,�� �}- 9D: 04AI LAKE 10A: GREEN FOREST 10B: WILD GERANIM 11A: CARIBOU MI MTHON ROAD) ) 11B: CULTIVATING SrMAT (NEAR STERLING) - 12A: RAFTING ON WE M WI RIVER 12B: MAP OF THE KENAI PENINSULA 13A: AERIAL OF KMI AREA = - 13B: AERIAL OF SOLWrM OQhMNM ` LA: AERIAL of SOLDOrNA BUSINESS CEM'ER CARS IN DOWn%N SOLDOINA .14B: 15A: •KENAI AIRPORT " tUSLOMES YOU• 158: OUTSIDE OF MW AIRPORT 16A: INSIDE OF AIRPORT 168: KENAI $GROUCH BUILDING - 17A: PENIINSUTA MALL SIGN 17B: OUTSID$ P6 MSULA MALL - ON: INSIM Mim" Kau 188: REDOUBT SQi00L :. •_3'f^-' . rl_• r. tc • :.r.,,3; o} 28B: CLOSE QP OF CARIBOU 0 29A. SOLDv&m L4, :HOTEL s . 29B: ' MWI MERIT II I MOTEL - A - 30A: KADW PINES MOTEL 308: RESMW SI&N AT NIGHT 31A: SCENIC SHOT OF RIVER AM FOREST 33: MOUNTAINS AND MARSH NEAR SEKARD 32A: FALL AND TEPOMTION DUST 32B: SAID DRYING ON RACKS 033A: Cm,W SADON 338: ARCTIC co PITON IN WIND 34A: GEESE IN FLIGIrP 34B: WINM SCENE ODIINTHINS 4 FROZEN RIM) 35A: TDRNAGIN PASS X-C SKI AREA 36B: X-C SKIERS ' 36A. WILDLIFE REFUGE SIGN - '- — --- 369: X-C SKIERS ON REFUGE TRAILS C)7A: X-C SKIERS ON IN 1102 TRAILS 378: , X-C SKIERS ON RBFUGB TRAILS P - +,: .f ' ' '.AFT l.:' {.• r,. •- , � .{''. r .' .. i ii.s y • r, f ri r ' �� '�. •�: t. ;rr `f 'd � L - jj����T T �:�R`Sa. +• . e . _.. o _ r=' .. ., •_ .cam=:-.:. ,. :._-,. _ _ , . r _ .. __ c ME: ICE HOCKEY GAME 39A: ICE HXTEY GAME • n 39B: ICE SKATBR OUTDOORS ^ U 4OA: BROOM i•IOCMMY DIMING SOLDOINA GAMES - 40B: BROOM HOCKEY 41A: BROOM HOCKEY 41B: SKIJORING DURING SOLDOINA GADS _ 42A: SKIJORING 42B: SMOBILE WITH MOMMIN IN BACKGROUND a `°"'43A: KIDS ICE FISHM''G 43B: SPECTATORS DURING SOLDOINA WIMBR GAWS 44A: KENAI SPORTS. CENTER (OUTSIDE)At F «! 44B: INSIDE SPORTS COVTER 4SA: SKATERS ON THE RINK :4 4SB: SIGN (PUBLIC ICE SKATING) s 46A: ICE SKATERS INSIDE 46B: ICE SKATERS INSIDE (NA: KEidAI RECREATION CMR 47B: •SOLDO►TNA HIGH SaVOL - i f.. •i• i elf: ` ;..., --- � ..... - _ ' ^ �'' -.a' _z.• �: it ` �/ .. ° � F SBA: HUSKY UP CLOSE SBB: EAGLE UP CLOSE 59A: GRIZZLEY UP CLOSE 59B: ALP OF A MFA 8' TITLE 'The kenai Peninsala" GOA: TITLE "SITE OF 1988 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES" GOD: X-C SKIERS AT SUNSET....FADE. • N.. . .. L. • : _ .—_. - ., c _.fin r• a��� :•� . .i., ;�• � � •,i - a" %,1:��•: t•. r,•' rr '' �.i';y'�'fr�r4;;,'�„r� � . : r� . � �. - „ r�, r'.f.•{., .. • '�i°1!• w ��yy'i'- t'�' '.�L.ilifa(*�� -(p ,' h'i ..�„T to rR.,i -�" 'j:' _ _Z •. --?;- ram: i .. ...... .. .. ... -- ._ .. .. .. .. .. _ 1 _ ' U N EAGLE EYE VISION: PKotoc��aAPHr AND MULTI -IMAGE BLIOEWUND PREBENTATIDNSr A March 13, 1986 PROJECTED EXPENSES TO MODIFY AND EXPAND MULTI-DIAGE SHOW TO PWXYM IQ3NAI-SOLWINA AREA (1SO-180 slides....iS-18 minute show) PHOIOGRAPRY DONE SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS SfiOW....... ....5300 TITLE SLIDES $ SPECIAL EFFBCT SLIMS* *so,* eases ....... $260 USE OF ADDITIONAL PERSONAL SLIMS, a go a* @oases *o&qo*o#e$3OO EDIT MUSIC CUPS FOR NEW SHOW.... PRIM' -OUT DESCRIPTION OF EACH SLIDE.....................$SO NARRATION (SCRIPT DEVELOPM W AND TAPING) ............ J250 LABOR AND PROGtAMHING aOSTS...........................s800 TRANSFER " %I = TAPE................................$300 WAL.........9.9.$2300 seal a`., P.O. Box 4550 Kenai. Alaska 99611 a-� a 42 � 6� :,•' _ :jar � � ��T11111. • t • • .• ... , i - . I • ' .'fir n . r �� � :•ref- - Y ,t. , 5 r - .y 11 � I SrrY Resource Deve�o rent Council forAlaska, Inc. «' V � I a & ; In Im% mm Npb NMI$ - MEMO `Z. ,. March 19, 1986via PM TO: Members of the International Trade and Industrial Development Division A meeting of our division is scheduled: ' ! fors Wednesday. March 26 wr. time: GAS - 7:45 a.m. (another meeting scheduled at 8:00 am, 3 iva Mott so be prepared and prompts) at: Cook Inlet Region boardroom Sth floor of the CIRI building aNtry� 2825 C St. w�''"Mw �7yli NtCBlG oDo A. own This meeting is to work on the international' ' - wrMw► Trade/Industrial Development policy statements from the '•or.• draft synthesised at the March 19 meeting. aN ' Your suggestions, ideas and debate are important to m0M XS ,galing gtates�ents .LtiB hwt Am.31 Please make an extra effort to attend this meeting, especially those of you whom have participated regularly - i�awwn throughout the year. We pant you to help enjoy the:- "'�" fruits of our labor in developing policy guidelines. ` ' I look forwar8 to seeing you there. �w 4► Larry Dinneen Division Chairman �A - Via: •._Rr A� — --- �- - - -- �M• _ �� - - - - - -i �-•ice. , WO '.sus. T { �.-ri�ifli:!!L'Aaf:zi :.-aa�:a ••Y' - iin ''ELF N"fl. _ .. -ft - .. THY' ; - .. .. • . _ . .. - _ r� Due to Alaska's unique location on the Pacific Rim, its vast endowment of natural resources and its political stability as a part of the United States, Alaska has a comparative advantage in the world with respect to the export of resources to and the import of tourists from the Pacific Rim. Alaska also enjoys a strategic position in the Arctic, offering trade opportunities with other circumpolar regions, as well as Northern Europe. These "near west" markets in the aggregate, are significantly larger than domestic markets and offer broader trade opportunities which will stimulate economic development in Alaska. Accompanying, and in many cases preceding, trade are opportunities for cultural exchange and technology transfers which enrich the social fabric and add to the quality of life for all parties. Industrial development in Alaska should be considered in light of the international opportunities which will be enhanced by Infrastructure support and capital project investment. The choice of projects should be analyzed and chosen with an eye for encouraging or enabling industrial stability and diversity, with growth. Stimulating investment in Alaska's economy through such Industrial development should be approached on a world-wide basis. This position statement outlines actions to encourage expansion of Alaska's resource development sector by trade with other countries and investment in industrial development. Much of Alaska's land is owned by the'state (280) and should be managed to encourage sound resource development. * The administration should focus its efforts to incorporate a "sales mentality" into the resource managers which will encourage inventory, leasing programs and sales of resources to the private sector. REdnLATiONs. FERMITTiNd A�jQ ENVIRONMENTAL PRO�"ECTI� The ROC supports clearly identifying international trade barriers and their reciprocal elimation. * The Pederal Customs and Immigration law should be revised to allow stopovers in Alaska by international air travelers. (see Tourism action) • support the proposed amendments to the Administrativq. Procedure Act, formalized in 88570. �:•�... ,. _ . .. .. •.-_:�__=:�,tit:i5",�_�...._ti.'s�.�_...._..!,.:�:� 0 Due to Alaska's unique location on the Pacific Rim, its vast endowment of natural resources and its political stability as a part of the United States, Alaska has a comparative advantage in the world with respect to the export of resources to and the import of tourists from the Pacific Rim. Alaska also enjoys a strategic position in the Arctic, offering trade opportunities with other circumpolar regions, as well as Northern Europe. These "near West" markets in the aggregate, are significantly o:. larger than domestic markets and offer broader trade opportunities which will stimulate economic development in Alaska. Accompanying, and in many cases preceding, trade are opportunities ` for cultural exchange and tenhnology transfers which enrich the N. social fabric and add to the quality of life for all parties. Industrial development in Alaska should be considered in light of }' the international opportunities which will be enhanced by Infrastructure support and capital project investment. The choice of projects should be analyzed and chosen with an eye for encouraging or enabling industrial stability and diversity, with growth. Stimulating investment in Alaska's economy through such industrial development should be approached on a world-wide basis. This position statement outlines actions to encourage expansion of u Alaska's resource development sector by trade with other countries and investment in industrial development. LBO LMMJ i8 An MANkGEMENT Much of Alaska's land is owned by the state (200) and should be `'=• managed to encourage sound resource development. ==� * The administration should focus its efforts to incorporate a - - ---".--:'� "sales mentality" into the resource managers which will encourage inventory, leasing programs and sales of resources to the private --- — --:,- sector. .-- 2E0[1LATIONB. 2ERMITTINQ An PROTECTMN- _ The RDC supports clearly identifying international trade barriers_k and their reciprocal el imation. Y �3� * The Federal Customs and immigration law should be revised to allow stopovers in Alaska by international air travelers. (see '° `-` '-_F` Tourism action) * support the proposed amendments to the Administrative Procedure�i in 8B570. Act; ormalized •:�f� �'i � i( • '^. t � ': f�' � iJi. t�'(�.aa.-L3LE •. iJl:c. - • i�Yi'L1�.7�- fir..-r..•-^-....�..-•-..,r--- -.-.---^-^-"'T+r--•--_'--_r.-.•�l.l� '_4�"'• i:" '. .�-L:.'i.Tt• I DRAFT - INT'L. TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENT EDUCATTON AM Training Alaskans to meet the changing job environment, to attract prefered industries looking for a particular mix of labor pool, and to reduce unemployment overall and seasonal ofeacademia# government ibilit of th desired, is the reapons y 14 and business. All three sectors should be committed to educating the best possible, in efficiency, production levels ,and quality workforce of product output. It should be recognized that Alaska has both for instate - -- - .- �-- comparative advantage in certain human resources, use and for export as the best people for the job. Nobility of labor within the state is historic and recognized as constitutionally mandated. t7on-traditional forms of education and employment should be recognized and implemented when they enhance Alaska's areas of productive exchange. comparative advantage or open new y * Trade missions should be undertaken, recognizing the potential = fat reverse technology transfers, as well as the cultural and business opportunities which are of prime focus. The business exchanges should be approached from a sales, not just a public relations, approach. At "Niche marketing" concepts should be understood and those markets researched for Alaskan products. Alaskans should become familiar with the markets they serve or seek in order to supply the most ; preferred product and establish long-term relationships and commitments with those consumers. * Scholarships for resoutce development programs or vocational training should be implemented by all three sectors. _ . • . > ' .--..::. , ;; ND Alaska is a leader in certain science and techology areas, * Export or trade more expertise. Y * Arctic science 1�= * Reverse technology transfers * Product development for specialized markets. Q - wie`r:Sl�tf4saavnlii�o�r�a�:iY"Yi�S-.c-..+.., ,,.-.t Siii'El•��cMli3rt".i.�"Y�Y�iie,�- � v.... p .}y SE .«....-....,.+.....ram— - . _ . c- `I - --- -*&, '- -- - -- •... __ . . 01 0 X"AR meow o sob %; V.)- X. CAW. OP C144. *Ira air a-valu," 1 &6 Ceigiffewd S. "MUSS ti 106=1051 SOV. sells NUB a. cost Wu Assam"Rew alias D. "abas 9. vacams of AdJuitasnt- gate ai 1. amm a gum" O. cowxnu MOIL" JOW, too" Jormrd;J. Jaw 6 - osete awall I $MRaced). . (b) Wds"Isr1les) Crawford. M601W Visit ) . .. It"" I tive (Vale vats . SM at (a) tAsts a (Moore* kilo Affairs (Sr.011, sv�amwase ftille v6sts Jbilea. Vat") (JO�60*U) Oats, 1"Gessul are gout. Is cWtow To, On (a) "Malin in the Contains tle S $0100 otbal "th It Ulst, Code to boaters 00 hisout,"OL= "Apgndiss gaconsider 6 by a (b) Or W. loot A"Yor Greater vote stas to tM per"Im twu@twn WA"Assn" PablilOJOVUS Ccas C, go SOCUS an I wwtwu . . SC-Iffitre. toy") 16 S"wd 901 Aral"L wf Gantt ustirt• .. I 4i6irg jot ail J&JgOfA Gat&05 Wings" sales lax (180101 . am 0 . . Zia service At J. ummattal of onto .,elm jot Curt I tug gated findsq I jog tba gilL Out I 40"T, 9". ."vital 0 ii ieottdsale tuftindst Ma-141 moons A- 1: X 77— N r t et (b)d of Lots 19 and 20. Block 199• w6- ov"R•son• i aotte of sward. Station 10. Township 1 South. tRna 1 Vast City of aware from Single- Pemily Rooldential to Limited Camnarcial District" (Mayor. Rea. P.C.) to) 'seoelone� u►d )CddifTo l0, TlovnshippokI South. RRange 1 Vast• �ity of Sward to Hulti-Pamtly Residential" (Mgor. Rea. P.C.) (d) 91da : 6. 1)ohibitions on Reserve Pit* on Borough wwwoR. CONSIDERATION Of RESOLUTIONS (a) recantedNLands Within , 3Tt•�orroougga Located Seater) 19. TSN. RIM S.N. to Ellen Sh•ttl•sworth" fwyorl .;'? (b) B abst "Approving a Temporary Pull Time oe�leat HaAes/Administrator to be Charged Proposed to the 986 Bond Inoue Projects Tranefarr and Contingency Funds from Completed Projects to -ton C to the post' Threu h Completion of the Schematic nasal, (Mayor) PSTO TO 3i1B (o) WI ' "Adapting the Procedures Manual for the 0 o Assembly meetings" (Policies 6 Procedures) (d) -. 866-24 "Grant a Public Eaaament Across rough ReaBo b nu LOceted to eh Ea 8 12 T ' ship • North. Rana* 11 West.e6. ..eAlaska" Mayo) , r`"' _. - f:)Ilia, 6 "Authorising a Negotiated Land Sale of eo recanted Undo Described d Being a Portion Lot 7 of 8action 22. TSN. R9W S.N. Alaska. to John 0. hadford" (Mayor) RFd ALTB�NATE a ; (f) Igo, 86 2§ "Requesting the City of Kenai to Roane Pow—r• gor Snlld Waste Collection and Disposal"(Oliok) ;r�! POSTPONED TO silo ' (g) . B "�A►pppprovCoa•eruotloa aoum•n • Ntkleki tadiagebe Rena! Elementary i %r o a School Projeee• tad Ap roving Changes to Contract• with Morrison Knndean pCospaay and Wises. • Cash to :p-' �. • Utilise the construction Mwagor Approach and Authoris the Blddin and Cosaeruetlon of These ¢ Projects" (Mayor) (h) 6 - "Appr Construction Documents PP-iea—ii id'6rr Architect McGlothlin Baliwt for the 1957 SaQN Bond Renovatloc and Nw Addition to the soldo�ene Elementary School and Authorising Bidding Phas• (Mayor) " t;:•{ �: (t) b�"Oppo•!nG Nou•e gill !U WhloA Would Lift ,.>,:y.+.•i:; •a sa )u of t Alaska Public Utilities Conte•!on"•(Wall!) (j) e " roving Construction Doc to Pro areal � y ro cot Niyaord 6 Pestoh for the School Bond New Peototyps Ntktoki and tlenttal �•n n•uta High Schools and Autherising Btd IGS thaw (Mayor) "Appravtag as L t tGr ` .�, (k) •4 Coaseavc0a PtyasM �iddia-gYPMra.". . r Hop• ti-1 Scheel and AY``th_Orif•(_!ng y '� • t` �{:tiffs °,r. ; it . �,."1: �'�'' .(MYy/ot1 fl) • IlApproving the •e Na�`a, WN t-.WtW../; • .^1.�.j;-f-yt�I43 a sa a`ar• fer eh. Pr�opeas0 19ta� ron� i•ew .:. !;'��,. �r�f:,;��'r � - _ ....•, -3• �w •S)�ti,�J: tMn I y0r t0 Negotiate a Cot• :�,.' <'t�;.`; ,vr;••- tram' () :l'.i{t•9Y'�':1"4���ak�Ij>•�fkl X.lw �.! .. ....:.t'••j;i jQ __-.-; _- ,_- -_ _ �n�� 1,., ^y [�..-ii}ifr ` ?`j;e`I ./'i.',.':.i:;J','•���it�r,.f.'..5,�:3t(i�isrf1�(�'• �� '�%r:�{�{��",�5,'1 ',}tIN. '_ T�' .%-lii6�:, ..r.'.,_fL•�S1�i'J`irP','�?t)_'sV.t-i't•�is.l .� .Y.. :_ '6 ,,:,elrrtsx,YAiia _'-�.�'•' ..1s�• . y�,�.;R,bjj.j��' � - �x_lt.. y:,.`.r� .. r :i _._ "Authosising and App Retcadtng of er i jation indebtadneea of the Rsaa! -8 of w Borough (Mayor) L. PRNBIMO1.EOis1�Si0M (This item lists logtolation whiob will be addressed t et a later tine u noted$ not for action tble mseting (a) Ord. SS-79 '4hMttng a NOW Che ter 14.06 to the tore�odte hl"tBeads to Be O the WPBRoaV131onanc (010k) Pon"O TO 4115066yetam (b) Ord. 66.7 "Trevlding for the Mire a' tocal aalifteg al ' s Labor Oovasemant Lunde Beplo7msn Oppo (Brovalearsy/Olick) BEAR h/1 ' (n) CChha ter 21.01--nLins Usee FIMMilnnowaand ls toning Paowrs to toots" a Rw section" (Itayor) MBAR All (d) Ord. 66.20 "Amendin the Rana! Paalusule�Bosouih Code Cho tor 21.76 �arklaaggAQUITamsnta illthin the __. city of award (Mayor) am Alt (a) Res. 65.1 "Apprvih?4=6 of the As"eunt Between Aetna* nce bnoesbirs and the Rena& Peninsula Bercugh for the Acggutsttttoa of Right -of -May an sport Lake Road" (noyoo �Vj (f) Roe. 06.25 "RsolauitylnR a Taroel of Borou4)+ let- r`'i' anted Lend Describeda C 6. Benelon 1t. wnahip ' S Moseb. 9 (test. gward Meridian no gshool ._ ;?'g�•: Wrposas to Tubiic use and Approvins the Y. U Besvleaa An a+ Mo for the Ridwageterin`` fire (Mayor. Re0. Rio Ord) pf---_ i�1 •:�t To no CMSM (g) Rao. 66.27 "Autboria an a so`oelaead Load sale of raugA Patented oesos}bee as Lot is Bectien . =wnshlp S Morth► Rapp i IheC 6swsb Mar isa aka Robert L. gchmldt �Ma7or) M• � AStOR6 NIYB PRIOR smelt vim OBJECTS MO'f ON TO .%^ � : •1 (a) Osorge Molson• VFW Anchor Point ;`• M. MAVOR's RWORT (a) M. R. Oavla SON.. vacation of utility easement . .;..,. 0le11444 toe within section %t. sanubtp6tooth. CM vast at tnteraaction a Neer seat and "Via street T. As6iMBLY AS IIAYOR'6 ..- •;F��..•l!;�:.,...�...j.,f, . f •. �.i q PUBLIC 00)YISMYb ANU TUBLiC tons um of .r,•, •_:.-.+ f�f�}�> ,r��, IM YNIS AssBMBLY f AOEl1OA � .� '(• _';' • IIEPOR'ig :., t'� r � t ` } r+ lsl! -itti � i, R. HAT)(ilIAL6 AMO - f �•%r. � � + r'n ...: ,u�� % :,'��,,,- ".�. KiRtIMp`j�l�•AOJOUBI6(sIRtApftlt��1',}�R6j. ,," !, 7 a�., ; �i � • .Fi1 .i: • r- _ y f '" r c 1: All. „p . IVF -�' e DqWv�la ment CouncilR�ourcp • for Alaska, Inc. M C . In twit NOW NMh M11N111— MUM E - mt oros PCecurWim March 12, 1986 CIO TO: Members of the international Trade an C1. ," �'-. �' e Industrial DevelolPment Division •'. QK�f�i�rtl1 � _ .. row A meeting of our division is scheduled: " Now for: Wednesday, March 19 s time: 7:00 - 8:00 a.m.., ow: nee at: Cook Inlet Region boardroom 5th floor of the CIRI building 2525 C St. :...... a�>. N This meeting is to work on the international o..� Trade/Industrial Development policy statements under a new format. i - im �»��, Your suggestions, ideas and debate are important to MAU t ' �bBBM. �W iCS ,Bt11knants the lima SYM, ;... - Please examine the enclosed material to help you FEW understand what we are after in our efforts to synthesize NOLMd an economic strategy for Alaska's leaders to undertake. o I look forward to seeing you there.rAOIL WA A. Larry Dinneen ` Division Chairman umiiL /YA TMI •�L.. tiLAf,.: Ad ` ..r� �.� t �r r - I - 4 Vr �. 4:i`;fl�?:`, ��-,, I : �t i � �,i.•'},:` . � !:: k A .L j l !• ` �i _ ' 'fir s- i, ,-..Fi-.rc.Ti9u:� ;.r . "�L' 0 • - . . w _ .. `ice Al M .j n ' '' $ AMMW.= ALA_ SRA@ S N= pRODdM T-NDUaTR4 The output of Alaska's wood products industry should be more than P doubled by 1990. To achieve this goal, less than 500 of the s state's yearly sustainable yield of timber harvest would be ' reeqquired. By 1990 the federal government should offer at least 600 million board feet per year from federal lands, the state should offer 150 million feet from its lands and private landowners should be producing 400 million board feet. Harvests at this level would add more than $100 million to the state's annual economy. Sixteen percent of the forested lands in the United States are in Alaska. This encompasses more than 28 million acres of :. potentially economically productive woodlands, publ ically and privately owned. " j1�III AWNERSHIP Too much public forest land, both state and federal, has been relegated to restrictive use categories wherein the practice of " forestry is prohibited. On private lands less than 25% of the volume of annual growth is harvested each year. Because forestry is the science, practice and art of managing for human benefit and associated natural resources, including, trees, plants, wildlife, minerals, soils, water, recreation, related air a' and climate, it is imperative that forest lands be managed around multiple -use principles. ;1 * Federal, state and municipal land agencies must offer land for _- -� sale or lease, as recommended by industry, to increase timber harvests by 1990;.as described in the first paragraph. /i Land management plans being developed for federal, state and borough lands must address timber management goals and opportunities. • To comply with the constitutional mandate to encourage settlement of Alaska land, a land disposal system should be Initiated that would allow for private acquisition in fee simple or long-term leasing of forestry/agriculture lands in acreages large enough to be economic. All state land should be reclassified resource management. •, .. .. -,. Place all state land management under the Department of Natural Resources and administration of those lands exclusively under lx. the Division of Land and Water Management. Manage all lands to maximise resource values. = ` ..TxrG17•_ i . .i ;tip. .... - = ' .: c'• r :-r" ! x �flfl �:a;Z:.±�°• v) +•'• r y� � 1 L x, r 'f`: r�l�'i3i.1�.W'.w1`r.+=•r.z.:it,4�..�.`•;1W:.+.i+aa.i •i•.•;Gi:ati)ar..l>w•J[ISfWL't/�tiit��"�Nii4it�iT-s'i'•"S �,)•.i�yi•.' } .: i bi 41 - - it � -• a r - - ' flak. .. .. ... ' n a ? .•fit ., „., T .. F'� ..... o - wood bage.Z * Inse .and disease infested timber should be cut promptly through salvage sales to reduce the threat of fire. Overmature stands of spruce and birch susceptible to insect and disease epidemics should be harvested immediately to prevent damage of the forest resources and private property. LILTUM 8M BUTROR ' ' BL PROTECTION * A review of regulations applicable to the wood products industry must be undertaken to analyse costs and benefits to government and industry. To encourage productivity increases and environmental protection, regulations should be based on the use of performance standards rather than design criteria. * A public -private ad hoc task force should immediately address means of improving and simplifying the process of obtaining permits and eliminating those which are duplicative and unnecessary.,.. * The resource agency responsible for issuing permits should act�"� as lead agency and be responsible for all aspects of a permit and should have authority to override recommendations and stipulations proposed by other agencies. * Prior to the adoption of regulations, an estimate of the economic impacts of the proposed regulation should be made available to the public, in accordance with pending legislation. iNCENTiVEB AM 2A== Alaska government entities, through their ownership and control of forest resources, have immense powers to influence how and when these resources are used by private citizens. Through the judicious use of incentives designed to encourage private -sector expansion of the industry, gains to both the public and private sectors will be realized. The most important incentive to the forest products industry is access to the resource at reasonable cost. * The Alaska Legislature should, through pending legislation,, Provide the executive branch authority to enter into long-term forest management agreements (FBAs) with qualified private parties on state-owned land. 's •, : e -77 �V.00 0 • •t . . i. wood Product;s,' •'page 3 ter".. '•. +'�� BY put ing binding performance standardsr private parties would' liaiveat timber, perform reforestation, site improvement and other resource needs. Government would finance access roads and provide the reforestation stock. * A statewide, privately financed forest products association should be formed to address issues co6peratively, educate the public, promote the use of Alaska wood products, establish quality standards and lobby for sound, stable forest land and industry policy. ACTSQNB XUDJAt * The Alaska Legislature should authorize the executive branch to guarantee loans to qualified forest product businesses to acquire plants, equipment and personnel to allow for the most economically and environmentally efficient operations on Alaska forest lands. N fT�OJ:9�i :4 �0��ii Enn, c� AM * As steps are taken to increase forest products output by 1990, Alaska university programs must provide expanded education and extension services to meet industry needs. �TYt?i18 N�EQEps .. , * Alaska's universities have a unique opportunity for international distinction and leadership in the discovery, development and application of new knowledge for high —latitude forestry. - As high priorities, these institutions must strengthen research and extension to develop improved systems for enhancing economic and societal benefits of forestry development. C) et � ikisTQlri::s:0_.-kt..'.a. �•ls �ix�l`-•:•cF..s.:. ,.<wt .s: •t"��:�:`«-+Jiyr:tOW.. ' _ + i—" E,- a Alaska oLegislative Digest An Inside View of Alaska Policy House Budget Outline: PUBUSHERS: ZN Fe Mike Bradner / Tim Bradner EDROR: Judith W. Eckhoim Juneau: 886.1290 Business Office: 344.2A59 3037 South Circle Anchorage, AK. 99503 March 22, 1986 No. 10 86 CUTS AND $765 MILLION "DRAW" " House lawmakers late last week were oiroulating an outline of the FT 87 budget as proposed by : the Finance Committee. The proposal reflects budget outs of 4 percent to 10 percent for most state agencies and programs, but would require a huge budget balancing draw o! $76S million from funds generated from TAPS and other oil litigation settlement. Although the outs are generally larger than those likely to be proposed by the Govern- or, many observers had expected the Committee to out even deeper considering the bililoa dollar shortfall. House leaders have apparently made a key policy decision to use the non- recurring revenues from the Arco and TAPS settlement to fund FT 67 expenditures. The House budget outline notes that even with the outs proposed by Piaanee$ VT 88 revenues are in- sufficient to cover costs of the operating flget...not to mention debt service, loan Budget Cuts (From Pa a .g .. o a o. .. ams or the capital budget." (Continued frog page one) The Noose ; Neither the House or the Governor pro- proposal deals gently with loads for pose using the 11 billion in Permanent Fund local governments. cutting the -:•,. - - ''� undistributed Income and 1298 million in the .eduoa= tionsi foundation program by 6 peroeiat. rainy day account, but the issue is also The largest auto in the House proposal academic which rosorve fu—nd is which at t is cane in capital project funds, down is Points apoint s plans call or drawing on general load dollars from i349 million to' ST65 million over ai6 million base revenues $200 million (403)$ a level that presua• ,. generated from TAPS and other oil litigation ably will include most federal 'match settlements (continued page 51 projects. Student loan !loads were dropped • roughly 200 iron $63 million to $50 oil- "�, ,� What Taxes Would Yield lion$ with 100 outs hitting the bejisle- , . tir. ' ture$ Governors Offioe$ 9 or A. DNR$ Deolining revenues always bring up DEC, and Irish and Game. :'.. ;;� : li:•,,►;,�• talk of doing the unthinkable -- adopt - ins state taxes. Estimates or the no House proposal was discussed is the -`° yield or a state income tax, levied at majority caucus last Thursday$ ad that rates similar to Alaska's old tax draft will now be tempered by publio$ 6; ; - - -- - .-- - -- -,- rates$ show the following yields: administrative$ and behind the-eceaea legislative reaction. Nevertheless$ the fY 86.............. $308 million . ,,. • proposal does turn a tough corner is •Y 67.............. $330 million - proposing "to use" reserve lands. with : T! 88.............. S352 million , ,.: , only moderate outs this year. Up to now$ lawmakers have reacted cautiously to the �; —' - -- — -�3stimates for s state sales tax for we or one-time Income --the reserves•-:�� old$ i0 loot$ ' had built quite al Qeefw miO 1 � (assuming tax was also evied oa would be as rellowst aros% und the use o!. those reserves, :i; eluding quite alot of *motherhood llion x mil apple piety .00mpotition to depo._ sit --- - - - - - - - - . �t1t_.88.....•r�::aflt�>iT9.8 '.miiitoe. T ti Fv - r".��A19202�?� _ United States Department of the Interio �'',.� I r'1' NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Ir •%� ALASKA REGIONAL OFFICE sit UPLV assist TO- 2525 Gambell Street, Room 107 H32 (ARO—OCR) Anchorage, Alaska 99503.2892 MAR 2 1 Mayor Tom Wagoner City of Kenai Kenai, Alaska 99664 Dear Mayor Wagoners The State Historic Preservation Office has shared with this office the Kenai Original Townsite Development options report. Within the plan is a proposed Russian Orthodox Church Plaza. As administrators of the National Historic Landmark program, which ` includes an annual report to Congress upon the condition and integrity of National Historic Landmarks, we wish to comment upon the proposed Russian Orthodox Church Plaza plan. It is the 1 opinion of this office that the plan will .greatly compiromise the---, integrity of, the holy .Assumption Orthodox .Church Nation l--Historic - Landmark.: -the introduction of a circular plaza and linear path front the church to the St. Nicholas Chapel is not in keeping with the historic setting and may result in a de -designation of the National Historic Landmark in accordance with the Department of the Interior Regulations (36 CPR Part 63) governing National Historic Landmarks. The Standards of Evaluating significance of a National Historic Landmark include the importance of setting, materials, feeling and °. association as well as the "sense of time and place" in historical development. Conversely, a National Historic Landmark may lose its sense of time and place in history "inhere the location, setting, materials, design, workmanship, feeling and association have been so altered or have so deteriorated -that the overall integrity of the building has been irretrievably lost". The new spatial character and environment created by the Russian Orthodox Church Plaza development plan as described will destroy the sense of time and place that is fundamental to the historic integrity of the Holy Assumption Orthodox Church, St. Nicholas Chapel, rectory and cemetery. The introduction of modern walkways, establishment of corridor lighting to the "shrine", urban amenities and the formalizing of the grounds without a sensitivity to the historic scene will create an artificial character. These counterfeit nineteenth century improvements and landscaping all combine to create a totally false sense of the ---"' Q past. F: tJ. 't k ° .a7? 2 We strongly recommend a revision of the Russian Orthodox Church Plaza plan. Enclosed for your information are brochures describing incentives for the preservation of National Historic Landmarks as well as a copy of the Holy Assumption Orthodox Church National Historic Landmark nomination form. If you have.any questions please contact Regional Historian Robert Spude (271-2638) or National Register Historian Kathleen Lidfors (271-2632) of my staff. Sincerely, Mike Finley Associate Reggio Director, Operations cc$ Judy Sittner, State Historic Preservation Officer Father Targonski, Kenai, Alaska Father Kreta. Kodiak. Alaska N K -AoeN QF y Assembly A. CALL TO ORDZR `g Brow u0168 Valli e. PLe006 al ALLIOIAMCI Johnson C. tNVOCATtoo, env. Robt. Cozbura. Assembly of God. Kenai 11011on Crawford D. ROLL CALL $wait Hoorn '� I. VACANCY. DISIONATION OR UATINO OF ABSM(SI.YNZ!(SIR 611ok J r^ ' T. APPROVAL Of ((IIUTISI Regular aatitgp. Harsh 4 6 16.'86 OOccattalk • ::• ; t 0. COIMn= RZPORTS St:rRtad Pandal (a) ►tnana0 (Cswfosd Cara Randal Jobaaon. NssAl _'< (b) Laoda/eascurces ta"Astia. Raft"{. Johnson. Kseas Mellon)- (o) Estaiitive (Dale. Crawfosd. Noora. Small "@Cod) (d) Local Affairs (Noose. Dal". S)t0�{lead. Valli) , : ! - (e) ►ublic Verbs (8awa11, esotm, NnOahem. NOL"ne. ;Jy Mullin. Valli) (f> ate P"Oseatas (Johnson) H. AM" APPMVAL AMD CONSM AOZNDA (01 Salutinghe f and Oft rion ing toNowFamily"BerthaWPohin (b) 66- 1 "Apptnevin4 the Use of 040.000 for ft pi"- say ending to Sttpane the ADIC•Sosough Join x o :; Sponsored 1986 Annual Sprites Hemst�dous haste Cleanup to nalude Hamer and Sward to Addittan to Kenai- ; '400, tns" (Mayer. Raq. Vast$ Casa.) I. ORDt"ICs HLARINaB a - - ta) moo."Providing for the Hire of toaat Qualified i Q„• ,.. _ .. "^' POP on wratseat Funded IaployOant Opportunities" • tgxotmlCasay/0tiab)AS (b) Ord. 861111 "Attending Komi peninsula Borough ode "p .OL •Lane Use•Piaantns and zoning 8eotton" (Mayor)�--- to Inblude a New (o) d • 0 "Asesttdtae the Kenai Peninsula sorough FPo`P )� Requisesents Within the city of td) $rd Be sit Chsdtar 3.04 snactinR Chapter" 3.i0. 3.1Y. 3.14, and �.16 and NandinR/_ .vo. t . . laaiu l gorouggrAA PCode ioemCencontained orm wt b 'ifltlis3)'„(Mayor) OOBT►ONZD 31t61M - - . --- — - - te) 9eQ. dins as 1.05.05040) to Limit thr consideration by Dan ins Reaansideva- ... °:::.. -. -.,•' orr ctoo of Any Ordinance or Rssolutton Adopted bye Thrae•fourthe or Greater Vote of the Assembly �. Nsmb"rship" (Noora) MOAT V/NOTtes Of RNCON. )/lx (1) 0 d 6- 8 "ProvidingR for on elected Board for nsule Hooptcal Serrvtse Area slid yr "a a e OZ@BATZDCVINCTICS OV OrMNBWRRATIOON11116 rem" lMcOahanl _ , J. 1i"OBBCf10H 0f a01MANCBS lal 0 11ta`daiCind dlassifcatioand selection toe eM eucpose o! CbelLleaeton" iMaroc) tb) 0o reel ascent"alM yot)• Borough Sales "a Rate te) o�q,.�o¢�- 3t'.�:n`$`�"naltiee: %eecsbaoe:°e� `cboiK:°:i!`; Pentesuls Borough to Senior Citisen Orgentsattens" (finance Cate.) ld1 a e - S "Apysoopprioting $28.900 trot• the Uadeaig- na e a r Petnt Fire and emergency medical Service .• Ara, PuRd Ba1Mae to tRariaae ConetRRMe ter the CCaapitalPPs jects" MgeelrgMay Medical Service Area (e) ued. 56-29 "AAsndtng RPS Code of Otdtnanaae to Add "ot Meaabbl'I N'tobow isaM~dbuok" Mllekln the event R. COMS106RAS1011 Of SIMMONS Rg (a) 9 of cawsab- 0 t� ttoorntlodiband leeftess of tMRRe2asitPNOW auto Borough (Mayor) ib) LLA—lu da"Pdsevidea the RegolutionReS 16622 e��rrttwa s. tevvin $36.099.90 from Sport Lake Road to Cehoe Loop Road" (Mayor) R iol Mov B6 -1 R"gi�aolut! ...43 Ej '; sion tarrin`ga funds ! 927.11 f►oa various Projects to Cohoe Loop Rosd" (Mayor) td) u6AtdtRgiluteeSlet9bttinleca v!d eleGrant ction ot0tcome ieCeosi1d Aeounand he ContngncACnll 1700 ion (e) aaolti°eA2`f0`tn012�ddnReuon6ibyTraaeg ,052.11 from Ciochanski Road to Knight Drive(Mayor) tt) ae a a Oeuokte,... the hard Loon Paving to the )Amount of $609.355.00" (Mayosl rp tm) ass Ban 2 "Granting nlninli lorevt)h easement for to1111onar Bliatita Asenciation. too." (Mayor) (h) RON. B - "Osaattng a utility Bassmant Across eareush • n Located it► Section 16 and Section It. 'torn- ahtp 6 South. Range 13 Moat. B.M.. Alaska to the City of Romer" (Mayor) �y (t) e- BiaaT Pant vuli SSooloLaullhMproperty to the Olt N Sotdotoa Vttb ten Stnkley almst topievement ire ace (1) a "AA��cseyvint the soloatabte Classroom "d Transfer win$`Puadi frX M-MateRed Project Contingency Accounts for Thetr Completloa (Mayor) tk) gas, of. "esereaatnb the R,m t PaeiWW1A 90900h ss Position Against Atlewna•♦ et re use of Bart end Read Ipnnp1Homer as a eta�tinA Atea us Atfiirttfe of fuelject andottso o(MUse to the at ey Lake Mydresiectria n-= 1 WE • a r'[{•� �Z'h y •• � t v �t`iffYt {F - - `f — ' .' ._ � 1• a'_y31 K , �9 n t11 RA. "Approving Matters and at son. Inc. of K.nni sn r eon Dlaa and Ina, of Anchorage Joint V'eruro, as the oluetw Agent and Br ker for All Insurance Matters for the Kanst Peninsula soroulb (Mayor) (a) ago.- "RaelassitytnR a Forest of sornulth Pat- en Des ortbed a Lae A. section it. Township i S North, Mask 9 vast. seMatd Martdlan Fran school Purposes to Publie Use and Approving the Use as a site for the aid we (sterlinngsFire Mrrice Area" (#eye Rp. It/sPSA Heard) REFERRED TO PLAN CLASH (n) a B „ppyostng Roo" sill 314 Mhtah Would ea Llii of tho Alaska Public Utilitlea Commission" Mill) POSTPONED 3115 tot 6 - "Approving the selection of Consteueefen/ e a nagsra for the Proposed 1906 send issue '' Proeats, Auehorls! the Nsr�ror to Ne``otiate a Can- trace" tNayor) AODP W/1(OTICE or REfrai. 3/10 { - - - — --- — ^ L. PENDING LEGISLATION (This item Lists leaislation which will be addressed at a later time as noted$ not for action this meeting (a) Ord. 05.19 "Enacting a Now chapter 14.06 to the Bosossh Coda setting Minimal standards for Roads " -V to G Accesppted Into the KPB Road Maintenance Syat#0 (Oliak/ POSTr=D TO 4/13/66 (b) Ord. 66.19 "Classification of Certain Sorsugh Patented Lands Under Tern Leases tow Sale and Establishing Provlsom thentere" tftsyorl ., (a) Ord. 66-11 "Resone of lets 19 and 20. Block 39. Original Townsito of Sward, Section 10. Township 1 South, Kantttts 1 Mast Cit of Seward from sinsle- Pamtly bad dentist to L�ted Commercial District" (d) Ord. 86.22 "Resane of Lots 1-3. stock 16. Federal Addition Section ! and 10. Townshipp I South, RonnRgs I Mast. City of Seward to Nuiti-Pally Residential" , (e/ Ord. 06.23 "Prohibitions on Reserve Pita on scrough made" (grew) (9) Roo. 05.161 "Approvin the Tease of the Agreement Between Plevanee and �,weome Lancashire and the Kenai Peninsula soreush COT the Acquisition of Right-of-Wsy on Sport Lake Road" (Mayor) s (S) esp. 66.27 "Authoriates a Nessoottated Land oats of Borough Patented Lands Boost bed as Lot 16 station -• 30, Township S North. lease 11 West. Swarb Meridian Alaska Robert L. Schmidt" r .� (Mayon POStfOMED N. FOp61I rRolzmATiow vtu PlloR NOTics UPON SUBJ6C[8 NOT ON us - MEETING AGENDA (a) Niklaki Access$ C. A. Short Nikiski Piro Ch4ef Willis. A asks State Trooper Capt. fwackhstsser 01 Anchor Pt. Five servles Awsa Juneau geq.. Henrietta )edger (a Coral Allen, Soldotne Landtt�t 1 - - N. MAVOR'S REPORT �'• a n': . o. am $natNEBB '' n 191 Vacation 20 et. wtliiey sassaane CollegRo Village Subd. Vacation Section Lino useasnts for Nikleki N.S. site P. ASSEMBLY AND FAVOR'S COMIIENfO - -� -- --- --- :--'-> Q. 9MIC CO ANo�LICSMAO OINTATIONS UM NAT M NOTGMAINBD Q.... R. INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS v "`:• S. 001195 OF NRKT MEETING AND AOJOUNM UT (Apri4' 15. 19161 _ 0 N March 279 1986 CITY OF KENAI Df�l eSOW Ito MMUM WMAL N."" Neff 70"HoNBns-M " . Y y SENT TO ALL LEGISLATORS._ Senator Robert H. Ziegler, Sr. Pouch V Juneau, Alaska 99611-3100 Dear Senator Ziegler: Please find enclosed two copies of a pamphlet entitled "City of Kenai - 1986-87 Capital Improvement Projects - Request for State Grantee" This pamphlet includes: • Summary of Past C.I.P. Projects Using State Grant i;.nds. • -The 1986-67 C.I.P. Prioritized Project Request List for State Grants to the City of Kenai. • The 1966-67 C.I.P. Prioritized Project Request List for State Projects with Area -Wide State and Regional importance. Earlier this session I sent you our C.I.P. book and copies of this q some pamphlet. If you would like additional copies please do not hesitate to call me. The City of Kensi.would appreciate your consideration when -j determining the State of Alaska grants to municipalities for Capital Improvements. The City of Kenai's past history has shown: • We have prepared and planned ahead for Capital Improvement .Projects by completing the design work and obtaining the right-of-way with City funds. Therefore, local participation "•n has already been put into the project even before we have requested grant funds. • We know what our needs are and that they are truly needs, not R....: wants. • We are continually striving to provide Jobe and lower L unemployment. Q. • We can achieve lower construction coots by bidding the projects , sooner and beating future inflation. March 279 1986 Page 2 +� We do not use State Grant Funds es a source of long-term Investment interest revenue. Feel free to cell on the Mayor, Council Members# City Manager# or Department Heads if we can be of help to you. Sincerely. =ell�,XlWho eO4"' Keith Kornelis, Director Public Works Department KK/sw Enclosure 9 r FOR WA8'YI! DISPOSAL COMMISSION laminG APRIL Z, 1986 7:30 PM �^�� � " A �ti`' SOL <. IMMI PENINSULA BOROUGH BUILDING - = ASSEMBLY ROOM ." 1. CONVENE } 2. ROLL CALL :.. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. PRESENTATION OF SPECIAL GUESTS y> 41 ( - 4. S. PUBLIC COMMENTS (thirty minutes) — 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS > 8. CORRESPONDENCE (approval and receipt) 9. ' PUBLIC COMMENTS -- - _- _ .� �.._•-�`-1:. ..-f `, l0. COMMISSION COMMENTS 11. ADJOURN ^ :d fit'• .... � ` -o D A PENINSULA CLARION KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION & WASTE DISPOSAL COMMISSION JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Public notice is hereby given that two public hearings will be held to discuss applications to the Department of Environmental Conservations one from Chevron USA Inc. for a Solid Waste i Management Permit. The permit is kor the landfilling of dewatered drill mudss cuttings and some oil contaminated sand and dirt to be located at the Swanson River Oil Field in the NWT of Section 9,-Townshi 7 North, Range 9 West, Seward Meridian. The second from Union Oil Co. for a Wastewater Disposal Permit for the injection of drill fluids to be located at the Kenai Gas Field. Public. hearings on these proposals will be held by the Kenaiinn Peninsula Borough Planngg Commission at the scheduled meeting of April 14, 2986. The meetings to be held in the Borough Administration Building in-Soldotna, Alaska will start at 7:Q.;' p.m. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning these proposals {' should do so at this public hearing or submit written statement to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department, P. 0. Box 850, Soldotna, Alaska 99669. For additional information pplease 262 �i441 contact Kevin Fanner, Resource Planning Department, - , or Zenith 4441. Kevin Fenner Planning Department Publish 2 X (April 1 & 8, 1986) N - P 1*1 [1 March 251, 1986 **/G Quads& Engineeriag, Inc. 401 Last Fireweed Lane Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2197 Attentions Howard C. Hoitan r CITY OF KENAI071 Dll 0011MM KENAI.ALAtKA fs�it iE1.EPNONetq•�dfb `i9aoo, kv 9i' . Dear Mr. Holtans ° I have received your request for payment, invoice d5424# dated March 140 1986. .'_':`• This invoice is based upon percentage of completion. Your letter attached to the invoice says that this is a lump sum contract. Your contract with the City for the Airport Master Plan update is a not -to- exceed 'contract billable by hours worked at sates in your proposal, identified u "Project Costs". You do not have a lump sum Contract. ' Schedules -2 and 3, attached to the invoice, are similar to the format that the 5; ' � p•.'.•' iS "� 1, ,. •- n .G, , City would expect for an invoice. I have reviewed the time sheets and other supporting documentation, and can recommend the following for payments _ Planner I S 91137.30- Pianner i= 110190.00 = Engineer III 13,980.00 Draftsman 6,380.00 >, Word Processor 20137.50 -r V Travel 490.00 Per Dien 130.53 '7 Other 1.589.36 Total T77,054.8u. The. other Charges that appear on Schedules 2 and 3 (the Project Manager time, _ the sub -contractors' time, and other direct costs) should be re -submitted with your next invoice along with time sheets or other proper support. Sincerely, p Charles A. Brown - Finance Director ..... U Ca/vyj _; 401 EAST FIREWEED LANE ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99603.2197 (907) 276-3"0 DATAFAX NO. (907) 279-5092 ANCHORAGE • JUNEAU • BETHEL • FAIRBANKS March 14, 1986 Mr. Randy Ernst Airport Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street I Kenai, Alaska 99611 ,.; Dear Mr. Ernst: �. Enclosed, are a brief progress report and invoice for the Kenai Municipal Airport Master Plan Update and Float Plane Facility Environmental Assessment. The progress report and invoice cover the period from inception of the project to February 7, 1986. y Since this is a lump sum contract we had anticipated a relative- sy simple ng format based on the estimated percentage of v completion of the project. However, the City recently requested a detailed invoice showing hours and rates by staff classifica- It tion, supported by copies of time sheets and subcontractor invoices, to comply with FAA audit requirements. Most of this inCormatis o enclosed, s since c not required to provide ee tors wereon a lump sum basisand were this level of detail in their invoices to us. We will provide bl f the additional information as soon as it becomes availa a rom - d our subcontractors. As the supporting documentation shows, we have exceeded the budget estimates by a considerable margin. This is attributable in part to the preparation of a revised work plan for FAA ap- proval and the underestimation of the time required for the c.. various tasks. It is also partly attributable to a much largger than anticipated requirement for technical analysis, adminis- tration and coordination related to the environmental assessment. If we were to bill the total hours, our invoice would be approxi- mately $68,860 or 98 percent of the total budget, while the ---- - - �-- 17roject is only about 62 percent complete. We have therefore based the invoice on the percentage of completion shown in theAF progress report, resulting in an amount of $40,100 for staff time and $3,512.34 for other direct costs. r Y Mr. Randy Ernst March 140 1986 Page Z a 1n view of the cost overrun, we would request your consideration of an increase in the funding of the contract, and would be pleased to discuss this with you at your convenience. ' k Yours trui 8o and C. Holtan, P.E. Principal _ scales '. - Enclosure - — -- - cA n U• _�•P4 0 fob n �o.ppausena-' _ 4 a :ws .r'1lFA - h • V 401 EAST RREWEED LANE ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503-2197 j (907) 276.3770 DATAM NO. (907) 279.5092 o -MnD ANCHORAGE • JUNEAU • BETHEL • LORI FAIRBANKS March 14, 1986 L Mr. Randy Ernst - Airport Manager City of Kenai Invoice No. 5424F�F 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai, Alaska 99611 `: J9 Kenai Municipal Airport Master Plan Update and Float Plane Facility Environmental Assessment _- Invoice for professional services from project inception to February 7,, 1986 1 Staff Time s: Based on estimated percentage completion as shown in Schedule 1 $408100.00 Other Direct Costs (Schedule 3) - `Q Travel 81,354.04 Per Diem 527.07 Reproduction and Miscellaneous 1,631 23 3,512.34 = Total Payable This Invoice $431612.34 4 ' ' fA J. �•- a "r': a: l - T— � o • WE Schedule 1 Estimated Percent Complete as of Februarx 7. 1986 Phase Is Float Plane Basin_Env_ir. Assessment 1. Socioeconomic Conditions a inventory 2. Socioeconomic & Aviation Forecasts 3. Float Plane Facilities Requirements 4. Development & Analysis of Alternatives 5. Preparation of Envir. Assessment 6. Public Involvement Phase Its Update of Kenai Airport Master Plan 7. Update of Land Use & Facilities Inventory 8. Land Use & Aviation Forecasts 9. Facilities Requirements 10, Development & Analysis of Alternatives 11. Preparation of Physical Plan 12. Funding Analysis and C.I.P. 13. Preparation of Master Plan 14. Public Involvement 100 8;740 100 3,304 80 2,915 5o 2,700 70 5,324 20 -n 1 050 i''033 100 4,100 90 2,565 70 1,406 50 3,447 50 1,990 .. A G ` Y- 0 0 _ 30 2,200 D_ A 20 339 staff Percent invoice Budast Complete Amount 6,740 3,304 3,644 5,400 7,604 5248 3'940 4,100 2,872 2,008 6,894 3,980 1,656 7,334 10 0.620 64,560 IN 1 'f. Schedule 2 n� Staff Hours and Costs by Classification, Inception to February 7, 1986. UADRA Enaineerinat Inc. Hours Rate Hour Amy Project Manager A-;ff;f'i, Planner I QeW46A *^"0sr 4025 Av 203:50✓ 'f!,»erA••t 80✓ 45✓ 3,220.00 9,157.50✓ Planner II Bw,ar 186.50 ✓ Engineer III # pP�, per*s, e1�. 233.00 ✓ 60✓ 60 ✓ 40 oIC, /�" 11,190.00✓ 13, 980.00 ✓ 8, 380.00 ✓ DraftsmaniNwo, AA,, 4~ ; To/rf,0209.50✓ 71.25✓ 30) 1 2�✓ Word Processorf ,,,j R�w.Mr� �S' Subcontractors Aries Consultants do f'� a✓< «t 6,562.50 96376.50 ✓ LGL Alaska Research Associates A.T. Stoddard Ina. l'/ • • 00 TOTAL STAFF COSTS 65,349.0Q 1 Subcontractors' hours will be submitted when available. Schedule 3 Other Direct Costs l Travel Per Diem Reproduction and Miscellaneous ,Znvoiad {+7r $1,354.04 9(90,00 527.07 /Jo,rJ 1,631.23 11,r ,J6 $3,512.34 1 Supporting documentation from subcontractors will be provided when available. C 0y7:a .1' c '� �o VVY, 00 A0 ry mtf 'ra. .............. Kenai Municipal Airport Master plan Update and Float Plane Facility Environmental Assessment t w ... c Progress Report as of February 7, 1986 Float Plane Basin Environmental Assessment Estimated 9 Task Comte c �r 1. Socioeconomic Inventory: completes Technical 100 Memorandum submitted. 2. Socioeconomic and Aviation Forecasts: Technical 100 Memorandum submitted, and has been revised to . reflect review comments. 3. Float Plane Facilities Requirements: completes 80 included in draft EA. Will be revised as - - necessary following the public hearing and 4 agency review. 4. Development and Analysis of Alternatives: the 50 basic alternatives have been developed and analyzed to the degree necessary for the EA. Further work will be carried out following the public hearing and agency review.=' S. Preparation of the EA: the draft EA is complete. 70 Revisions will be made as necessary following ... the public hearing and agency review. 6. Public Involvement: the draft EA has been 20 r_ - - _,; � distributed for City, State and Federal agency ; review. A formal public hearing is scheduled for March 20, 1986. Weighted average percent complete, EA. 71 i_Pdate of Kenai Airport Master Plan y 7. Update Land Use and Facilities Inventory: 100 completes Technical Memorandum submitted. 8. Land Use and Aviation Forecasts: Technical 90 ='f' Memorandum submitted and is being revised to reflect review comments. .`. r F' 9. Facilities Requirements: completed in first 70 __ -_ :'r• draft form. Some revisions and editing will be T'.l carried out prior to submission. - ! • r" 1, _ 0 �-�...,•. .i ,. ,. .. ... .. .. .., � - 1. .+�' "(L ! 4 _- .. •'•'-`if 10. Development and Analysis of Alternatives: the initial alternatives have been identified. Conceptual drawings and preliminary cost estimates will be prepared during the next reporting period. 11. Preparation of Physical Plan: basic drawings have been prepared, and will be revised and supplemented when the preferred alternatives have been selected by the City. 12. Funding Analysis and CIP: work on this task will be started when the Consultants receive an indication of the preferred alternatives. 13. Preparation of Master Plan: the plan will consist of a report and drawings. The text and drawings prepared in Technical Memorandum Mo. 1 and the EA, and work carried out service their submission, will be used in the Master Plan. 14. Public Involvement: the Technical Memorandum on inventory and forecasts has been distributed for review and comments have been receivad. The findings of the study to date, and the initial alternatives identified, will be presented at a public meeting on March 20, 1986, following the formal public hearing on the Environmental Assessment. Display size, conceptual drawings will be prepared for the presentation. Weighted average percent complete, Master Plan Update Wei hted average percent complete, whole proset@ u 50 50 0 30 20 52 62 t. r� A -rAl FO - !I? CITY OF KENAI . 719, M 10 m -- /3 carFo Ia Sat I� 0 M M � I6 ~ 04 O O �v . � Wp • 1� N O v 10 � r'1 M M Af Grp► f.L r F r �r o;MYos t°9er6 Z:nlFv- /y KENAI RIVER SPECIAL. MANAGEMENT AREA HIEWSLIE7TE •� Qr; �b of the tip to � No. 16 February 25. 1986 `g NEXT ADVISORY . March 13, 10:00 a.m., Borough Building, Soldotna. `�ceez&ZLZ`�2` BOARD MEETING. ---- Lands Committee: March 10, 1986, 5:00 p.m.. Borough Building. OTHER MEETINGS Soldotna. = SCHEDULED: Gu i des Commit tee: March 3, 1986, 6:30 p.m., coffee room; March 10, 1986, 6:30 p.m., Civil Defense Room, Borough Building. Soldotna. r- Social/Recreation Committee: March 4, 1986, 6:30 p.m., Borough PLANNING UPDATE: Building, Soldotna. Agency Committee:. March 6, 10:00 a.m., Frontier Building. Suite. ' 1056, 3601 C Street, Anchorage. The Kenai River Advisory Board will discuss the final report of the Social/Rec- reation Committee at its March meeting. The report Includes conceptual guide- lines for recreation management of the KRSMA and specific recommendations concerning in -river structures, facility development and public safety programs. The board will also discuss its earlier recommendation In regard to limiting the number of sport fishing guides. The Permits Committee will also be making a presentation concerning escrow accounts to be required by permitting agencies In certain situations where habitat values are especially high or very fragile. The escrow accounts would provide funding for any additional work necessary to complete the project or restore damaged areas. The 1986 schedule for the review and adoption of the Kenai River Comprehensive Management Plan Is as follows: April 10 - Preliminary draft plan is released for advisory board, agency review, copies made available to public. May 15 - Advisory Board meeting to consider preliminary draft, resolve conflicting committee recommendations, make final recommendations to DNR. May 16-June 11 - DNR reviews advisory board recommendations. June 12 - ONR announces decisions on board recommendations. OJuly 15 - DNR releases public review draft of plan, b!aglnning 30-day review period. Copies made available to advisory board, agencies and public. August 19-September 1S - DNR reviews public comments, makes final decisions and adopts plan. September 16 - Adopted plan printed, submitted to local government and I f -7-7 , 7- 17- VIVHOND ':LFqistATiV F. BuRF.TiN nZNS OF van= From "A*114 Lot& Noma", February 20s 1986. F 103 ML"CPAL WAY, RM W LWW. AI WA "ON StAtA_XgqqiVtS from tiftra afterate hommared to h1fr_t. to "In# With the gdaftletrationis opposition to state ad 10041 ftVGMO sharing, 0166141 ad timber, receipts ars.proand for a precipitous drop In the fiscal 1987 Ronon budget. by 811% millions feem $212 atilSOP in. ilIC&I I* 2M state Shot* Of national IOT44t receipts would decrease (bgiora Grata-ftass) to S" million to fiscal 19870 To obtain that decreased hOWNers the tratim =at persuade Congress to change the law and base the state share of receipts on net revenuse IWtSW of gross. wave as Similarly, the Ni"Tals Umpgat Service (MIS) budget projects S . 6406600 10 00 Gt4tG I" Of SINT" mmas by $54 million (before Grass-Rudson redM& fiscal 1986 MONVOI). "at reduction would alse. be based an Dow WIWI= to deduct "the costs of aftevatift the vovemo.,, Roth amps in Forest service collections mad to W collections were $U* PWSQd In t" lift" ING administration budpt. The Forest Service PrOPOSSI never got off the gmmathes& but the , RMS 400aptSd, ft-M change before the 0"&ts, led by Sons. James McClure tit -id. ), MsUO3S Wallop 04V-4-401111-6thor out uses may be Changing. Us Vyonb& Congressional delegation, UftdGV Wallop's leadplWg Gaisral Accounting Office decision that the *State abate of mineral lWaltica Is atjoet to'* 403 PMOt agampft"a reduction. to is"" 19" on Marob I. out Of a tow reduction to .411 - sts.teilbf t".9 million Vold logo $e.3 millions She Wyoming delegation to othOt 4CWt4d the toss, said an sift to 204 Rich@" cow (A-**.) q In a yebrusly 5 letter to Governor 5d Berseler (9), 44k VUII90 gist kaY 104* Of' federal at"ist "vems Is difficult for us In VJ=bS to face, but ftes It we 100t, -04'"Issation. .said In the Utter. as *win dolego"Op conceded bum* of a y4bIVIVY 3 OVIDIOU Of the Gat rat Aga=tift Office (00) that; said state minotal ""Moe wM tot off limits from Gramm-Rudman. The .00 letter said.. that ww#rogr;m oir: OW take the 4.3.percfdt.autt� t Without -a Specific- exemption ilk ft&U-ftda"'W fads an tat"dod to coop""*te aats$ for their inability to t1whdorolly-oftod their bordors, empt.hom-s"Won.uldn"11 sold'aw, A$ not 0 sufficient STM4 to consider her te -Pp" . do local, gb&Wft prWag was not iftoomaded fo . V the galloon In the administration fiscal . pry. nat-in-lieu . of tax". sourly a favorite target of both the'adoialot"tum SO twom"S Mu.."s W bsattas a pytViletild character be" cause of the "at political norms dohs fpr- - $105 "Ilion. 01im RhO-1- VW 0-619sto Hash hrodate from 00 Goya vomat Fiume Officers "a -don is' ,444�'y.of—` l-prdo ImMPav"OSW* (W) teopial and taxation provisions for , 00600 M the No.1d or 7 dad-ft""T'030 VA temporary noCations. Hearings wors'"Id br"A 141 the tul" on, Weak 3p �"G WAS IstsVINtOd fielty at tbs...Zu Chief evoiNWA on pg� --------- ----- ------------ .w Leaislative 8uiletin 014.36 2 �. L�i18LATiVa auLLer=ll$ 1NDaft { As of 3113166' SWAEW NIRDliIR SMTK Sum $5" 7. swer Incas' Luc . f3fi + '• a personal safety to Public Schools , s 8a ii/13 romm l ampt- upoct r ad fi Lr Sa 1* Aibesto/ Rain to schools f1 — Ba 1i pePIV" sactirowd Checks 83 31 etat* Slide$ is Rural Cosrunities fi a 82 34 CwpsiP lbadlns ` p 36 MS Credit for ftmad 8ieh Leave fi, 8• .1Z Ba 40 Agricultural Prodact Incentive Prasm oil B�'4i A�cgift"I. Rlgbt to Land . fl " sa 47 CbMAtty lister• $Mir 00 Solid WastePro�eet Grant 11md/ �l S t d st48 Clean Air otmots f1 $a so 9opalati" Oaterelastlon Mad !lptitlemoat Recalculation fi i sS.Ooalel Borriae/ .. ^..ai 88 57 Prehmtlal We of slacks Agrioulturei and Piabariaa Pradacw fii Ci7 $erv�ee oi,l0i mstla Violence Injunations fi, s, 8, 14. 69 Sale of Alcoholic 8sveraps fli x ® 85 Taaotwr, WAIGIng and Child Abuse 03 84 lbur %%Maio Lava 6 oft"r Citum %blole Tan Ibco f 811: " 'M Paver to Adeinlster Contracts 03+ 23 1 _ i3 85 9s gupervieion of safety of 9m.mad Resavoira ils lOn.Pupil 3`r+a/partatlon Contraaw #S 76 us state 444 Mwaiaipal Tin s;trptloas f3, 'S• • i}, so, ii t:. , + 88.1i9 fribor Reiatioga.8ettwHn school �� sad ocher Public i4spioye// t+3• � - �i Cit!=ent Kowlna 88.1'J7 ge�le= 141 lt#leselag Claw of the state to Load within Grtain Altbts-of-liar f4 i - 5 d• 143 state Ald for kiwi Construction f18 A Znd 81ba Lys mictloa of $tote Treasurer ; i 8s is4 state Aid"for School Ccnsttuctlon .. >. ...• ... . _, da..lfti Caspwtitiw.ltiddla8.. . � ,.#5 ? ill$ Riots of paaf, oil" and Dlasbled . j 8a 185 U$lrletive- Disapproval of Coastal "Wassom Propose Mnrdlag -o! Contracts by moselpolitia _ r .. s� ' . 1b. �91 �iplolr!nt Pe4f�tanae S6' io . '8i lei-siialtLerrD.sanks is. its pineae.Doriiii _ N,1Mk CMiltleation of tiAtar srld pat tstot Paoliil�t Opar4toea .. •..191 �liln�' an�Reaordias'Docirlsntt ' - ,` Sa 263 C:i U411010ot/ 'hdylsory Comfooiou r . SOA Aicbltacturf'► ad hand 8uevh►le8 'esvtces CoatrMets 17i t+71 l — �a SO! Ala,ka.itate Piet CoswlstlM► ." , - ' f� .11 " ,, •, ,, _.` � �� o iL0 Alaam State Plrs Co'We/loa Apprnpi�lition �' ' ti „ ` NbIlo li t4bi iuQdin dr' 221 lopset oi! 1lutldlt�. il4tenlai supplies _--- ir' ''� -U. 20 1lun16ip41(1id �' o .` - � .ss !49 lsatstr Citteips• 1toiMOMnir tsopwrth•'xax feeuptlop ��IW �J �''. � ...... .. � • . - r'r . ' W •�o lint: troperCl► � t�ipi'ton-3;�'"�'' ,.'!�'!�� .. � � .., •:� - f ir�'_� a ..-.-N-•••.yh.,: ---.,�..,.�,..,�-.r..yf.i....,+�,,..�•,,,,;.�„yr,�;�a��._id°n`�'..a""+:;........,_A..�,.,.;.,,..�... +,-u--.•.�.�•-..--. _ - - - ''�..'...._".� ..d1"�'r"'r"�' - - L�jAalaeiw luliai:.i own -3- !larch 13, 1986 = q 2q4 R!*toriaol`Cabling' iu 3 n i8 2!i Aanultins,04aiaaion of Captain lnfamtlon 013 to m do wivioioaa , is 101 tlrtialp4tiaa of Muaiaiyalttiao in r111A 48,106 1140Alatiaa of ViAialaa for Mlr* il6 pup Alaa#a : Natural Satiety Co�rtiaaloa 114•, 2t- u..; O 374 Ctftta Mr ibt" Qutlity Mhanaaannt T. A 326 Zaa IDUO sA�±i "144pal Immiiy it l .� • 89 3$2. 211stmet"s A �35 ilw Capteal /iroj�otR fbaes x .. ... 81 30 ltro'riat1vX A*A No" A3' l+Il'INMI •taq Procaeaaian �. 'AAA A01608- U loOa •le, 31, 23 t , I 83 30-State OuWW' for t4matioo r ° Y,.l3111lb1rlo8.tbhaoi got 119, 12, 241..:. qi2 Aatlqul 0466141r Mwnus'funi 0,356 114atlOa CaapoifR..riaaaalnA ill, Z4 d8 li4. Ctrei�ta €or Soployint Maidante oo'of IDIOM026 U. 36.7. AlOU* 1laaidant 8lapioypat Prafaraaao • lfR,'if tiaWil Noes- i200 23 . .. St 37S flaiwa of ail ace Us"NOw 8cbotaagoa. �� ;' �- A l76"Zlanlolpal Rost SmIonatai 120, . Z• Q q 371 SIVA AAatloaa o K 3t- 381 ?orayre'rnbtat $a600lo _ e8 382 C" Aationi 0 Sri itMaal- Qo "t It 40$ Jolat iaaw¢aaaa Awanpdeoe 12Z � Y 4" $"to -Alt to aft"tioo 409 not to rnta . 123 o , ' 4u lbae walat�aula 123 +. E 424 8q 414 Aualolp*l Lad 8otitloamte 1t.�21i ltaall iAtity �aat i.... � .. , - - • , .,�ti �, U443 to . Rrportia* •#24 _ Dijlsion • t• A, Mun�,olpolltiu _. - • ' .. ' 6434 �paoiai ApPropriatioaa toAiaobarp ptllity Oebw iA4_•.. 420 U ;�`-' � ' � aaltvral R to ConrCitutloaai AtaaAaaat , r UK 3111arah+gMt Ao�iaa Act of i9t0 ply , 8 n .29.110m ial"Air 6MCS 12 Saab wat, i23, x4 N! ad. upenditvrr: of $tat* 00im �'- r -� SOhoal.District loyboA_ �aaka to r dp .fOR�A �ra�tsatos�-o�f_.�lla. - :r. A06*1 In" L n tdt 2l,Loll 9D ice tlaotiioon Study. - k�9 ' Cd"Ittaa *a local,ifptlon RIoaEAorq r'.. - o, � . ; •Z. 'f , ti wo b L"blative Main 014,26 - 4 - !lettaA no 1986 mm bum d1AA+RZIl1 Ills= 04 State loaketn oad deter di, S, �, 11.. to 6-WCoapenMAft- 14 u Taa#om of Awcultaxai Prefmreccs Lad 1 *l, ® U PAlaiyal utilities Saw& from ONel, 2 • 40 to 4, to a iS Asmexaeion Advisory Slact:lon 11, 9, 12, 14, 16 ® 16 TeacMratiasaU4 and Child Abm i3 29 111"n;t 'Ja gap ain by Public Ctilitiea 01 p4 St2 LeSirUtota Qaoltal Project ApprOpsUtian PI as M 23 AlarkA Heiser Miomy Authority •i : ► d U 2A Min lttl�iatel DirastOrr 1, 11 25 voter Proof of Bltilbility 11 uS 33 Ajrlcultural 3100 to Land 0 35 Stud IteSttUtiati of Plraaorta dis 4 3 -® 39 Preservattoi. of ApUcItnral Lad 11 - u 41 State-(iunii for Capital Projects no 12 ® 42.8tete'K$VOeal WitAsn a .4o60ueity a So Alarke 21"im Preference fl► 4., 7, 0, 9, L4► 17 a 10 57 MOertoa.Abatm at Pro6ram Appropriation tli, 3 i1B 30161 Pondity and CreatiW a Your Hostel Wan Fund t►3 62 tiswiitlity Wap and Overtime US 63 Pluibl" Co4m � 1i a 6t Teacher Remiss t "stem a3 RI 73 termit Rafone u 63 Re"Mloymeat "mitts under PM/M 02l 3, S . Rb 90 Repreaeatatsaa for Non•Cartifsed School Board and ftba Publia tbployas o30' 10► 24 . S 91 Olak Leave Utiraat Credit 02► a9y tioverrment Liability U6 104 Ow"tins:"40" no" for Caavicte R3 111 Load Saysce Ro"s and Trails •3, 4, 14, ls! Z2, �3 " - - Si 120-Mmtat lWalth Trust Lada 0A, is, - a1 i30 Ebucmtitaa4l amp oy ColCollectiveBarpinittp R3,139 Admlosetration of Certain Ousts of l olislature .16 03, 6, A• :9•.11•:11 MI.34i 6eend char cities to Rome Rut. •3 a 1S0•Alcoholic Severep Licanae to 134 Steto Blsiat is Aural Ccss mltiee' tar ue aoieptiem Certala ttltaiaspalseiss frolr Conlliee of. tatosait RoWwomentr A3 n ; NS.is9 Sactroachfaat and Rel00atim of•utiistlea •12 ...: R~ 146 #elooetloa of utilities (at.ate) 020 ` SS 162 Public utility Coates Representation -1 V ' — 0!t % o -- '. 10 174. S1tibiaob"Usi0, idtrrpaay Cara 7 Rater an tcbliv COestruatioa 1Si x 6; ► . 91 177 AM and eca Rll o! ElRctad Mnuioiprl 01916file _.... - - - p► ! _;� _ „ _ . y 10 wotr ratios tteutitty ►• .12� ° *1, 33► !!�• 3S N! 3.92,41 ~te•Asd for School Coaatrueti `•' IS, 10 ' is = Saloon Cleelitie rart Rates 1"k Ielaiol ftu Retite"fitr .r u J r. Lytili t+i'tu11s ilA•!i ` S • ftch 13. 19M "k Stab AN Vor sehooi Construotiol for Ualwused S�udsnte 07� r 2S7 Mi local .Rifort 07 7 . 0 263IR Cld" t0 `Cats lenn Hlthtm Certain Whta•o!•Wy it t he"nace riadhaes r Ito lscallsp y-- - - -!R s. Snttetires ealb slectionoIWw ie� !� 1 176 Qobtwwts lor,.Aubitsctural. 2-iariot ad ftmylm Sricu - r 2es Im "Araey-•serrlee Credit f� 1 _..-_ MS Ustlistacia>l PropertyLoans n . q�.12 �•a• : lle 392 Cred t+ ce for llon•Csrtilieated Sebooi !9!^Muaidipai Dalapit' 010820 Ia` 29'A DM- Study Of ITrita Mi"',t sib Alulta Hire N� .��,1t :•�� NS . *11. tiuii - IlousiGS loan. �,, . MS109 Staes 33 support for ltdueatioa r S14 OW illOi' )A` a3ZS Tom INetiaa liOM stole Cittem ilex i1 ... ss 327 DiseYeiurr at lntarmetian i � `! a Ll{aMtsint. eisatrical 1"Vectora AsbesEosi, in public, 141dines iiQ a 1! !De Stets 14ttet7. ili. a r a = - - :. ' - - r _ no state oil and . GAS.iMPOrty Tau CnOlt WDitotiaas Our 17 - _ "M 143 640141 Geiiptit� fonds iii� i3 - ' 11347 A1600 kits Brea .CosisStaa ill, lA. :Y } . �J v. lCllaiaatan 020088 Nws from Voter t3ssistratioa Lists 03.350 tfnaltiea ad. Weraet for Delinquent widelpol property Taus* oil Siddine i1i =.. no IbtlttCad .�m Unification to coi sty cauncili 14 .'� g ll1 - V h lu or Hire . - a � !76 iatpai•thlui . ;� �.•� �:;--..:..;.- �-.,.., ., ... � 1!: srs pubilo litiiitr paNr 6 Bawr eetn►ica beaneions �-_-, eS ;1y CsuMtral �bileaeiileanaportatioa pro acts) AS: iou land se aim Stab 104: Dieporlds Ne►e�C' Cre0ltr .. aiib - r NS ASO Ceeeilioatlan.ot rioter. and HatewaR,or oparatoz*A. "ile is i►23 betetatlnt Use of Groat Funds pititt" Siddit1$ ifs. ysr 1tObptlon ,a! letnlations its ' �° j_ �Ie'AS9 Iatbtra•C an Grant Maned lid N li enhaacemsat ilea- - ' � t. - -- �: `fIM► ,lief CrahrA .lair petrr' Qua tY ' Y to +►Ile' ltasident hplay!u+t p"farem - r , ' a ON oil nb ,siq r us substsnae- sesponas fund �. Ne ;l7=AtA Appraprbtions .. s � . �ro �y�ti fuel , �reeema . ' u tv i7! .>wiamaaa . . -.:.- •_...,��-:--• 3 ; �• J se Ail _....,..— ..: ;�.• ��:- • ; .-. � .� , ". .: , - . :: . r- �•)e:meneat JOB.. coats oa, all . rr } T gl ,�r�at igtenanos' Capital isprovsnsnts - ����•a N� Alfl./Roue is Z era -_�' A9�. iistteeiai 'tratlow uVo wound silt. 13 a„ `�r`3_K •�c „ � Se0:0�e1f1er�a,eYd/eC- "':. .. .. i19 _ , .• .• " Q o . sei �, � ,��,- i�'S�►'pii�s�#,riwnti YittiE' '�,� - ' - . .. I!0 � .. '-ty ,. liiNosw at putbitd ltuiidlfip R200 ;:l,'f t.. >: `�x __ _ % ."1toR� .luppoet:gt hbiia roliaa'l, Eonstruotian 1200. 320 230 �► _: } .a Xp 1p - - -` • ',,, • IwsiNaely Bulletin A14026 • 6 . March 190 1986 � a.. � S21 Mnaiaipai G.O. haad Debt Limit fZO, 22, 21, 24 Rd $25 Abandoaod Vessels 020 h 0 332 Tait Ite7orm 0210 2S. 25 Rl! Sal PaetialpstIOP of "Micipaitties no Politicei _ dubdivtslgps !M the Public Seployment Relations Act 021 RD 336 Trooper in Seattle 021 0 S56 Prior veer Data for 18/0 022, 25 }, $67 tftiiitisa NeSalatlon 022 id "S .toint xasurance Arrangements for school Dlatriots 024 ' - Sg7 Musialpai'ltnettlemate 024 RD $94 Natural Hazards safety COsminloa 023 IM 593 Gambling Option A25 n 60p Spraying of Pesticides 024 as 610 asiagnt pomain on .. ILL OU Land Lasses by the Alaska Railroad 024 NO 632 Riot to farm 129 — - -' Rs 64S Peevailimg iiage A24 M 647 aatardous Materials Reporting 023, 25 86 as aceding Cep 024 . 06. 637 Wotkalre Campensatloe Land A24 SA 658 halal Scoacmio Development 024 - ps 663 forsolosure of Ltene 024 -. 98 672 8atardsus Materials Y►tice 022 16 673 serdous materials Transportation Ma A2� ON 679 Alaska Products Preference �► H,iR 4 Reapportionment Ai MR 21 Repeal of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 07 SM 22 Limiting Appropriations Ale WA 24 Sharing federal Revenue Generated From Development of the Outer Continental Shell 090 ii,.0 . %JR SS Southeast Intertie A16 RJR S7 nave -Out Foreign Fishing A16 MJR 62 UN end KWWItura of State Money A20, 25 MJR 63 Riot to Kaep and Dar AM #23 WR 20 p"ort.oa Manlmising Local Rice All, 12, 14 L 7 i W nington _Ujx ate CONTACTS ' Rath-walllok Cathie 4101bers Federal4isison -Cen ter ... (202) 466-2014�r. ZAP �u TAL►ITyR , i�ro;RIGULa��BY.. RXISTORT Over. 6 "decade ago the Conere s directed: the U.S. Treasury. to issue. - regulations. • to ..tax certain non -gash "fringebenefits.• The orljinil reRuliati�onsi 'written- by the InterdSI:'Revenue Service .suoh widoopreed'-:.or#tiolas •that Atltey--werw-uithdrown ' _ and a-mowotorius,etas:placed on the issuance of rules in this area whdofi 1'asbeel until Deo+e►ber 31 # 1983. - S 1 fis'. 1984 .., . tax . bill, the', • Congress $9010 instructed -this:;. x86 to ieaue: re ulstionW governingthe taxation ..of:oertain :.ample er-►yrovi0od frig a benefit$ that previously had been exempt_ from taxation Saab aS opal personal use of vehicles. { A Itit reguiatione' -Vera,` issued atsrtinj In October ( 1984` Apia. .they_ Met- with, ...public:' critioisra. msiniy.•ner�asxee_ eA�Loyer+�drow3did `vehiele6. - were eubaect to taxation and" -the' Oaaordksopiss regUirementb were excassivw.• The Congires�a ia,: r`espoasi�; z04s rd- --• oorreatlw`e amendments:' .An- -1481- .1.9,85. _ that., .. '. reduaoid . -,-AM . �•reacrdlteaping Standards,• exempted c.ortaln.; .rehic 4060 -instructed'. : the .03 to. _ ence, .- Oss in- .issue aisiri yint reaulattonc, 'Pursuant -:to these ohan4es. contained in Nb,lio.. Low 99-�tu "Repeal of .;oatemporon*ous .: Roebrdkitpip Requ.lremeatse : the IRS Issued r48alatxons as Novemhe0.61 . 1985*In Dacikabs't-23,' ;-985ywhioh, revised, the: jwerulstions' issued on U;'Parl.., 2;;::-19$3� +sad,. Februs�ry -18', 1985. This- momorandum- i's. drown frog+ 0, 4xIstiss8.. re4oIgtiond and conlrefaaional reports.- ._ .. Awavell Wit. s s ! eatide 'dsrMm*.'1 :1985l:th:',0eraonsI-. use or:' an'.:Qip,1iyer- i�ovlQid vehicle is taxable. nPersastal qwe" i,n43udea . ooairsvtlaa s, r<'`wsll ii°'),oca)..pnd out�o�' tos+n.,person",travel. Rmployeee a ' Rst,prated t►c krep... siiourau records,,. to : � substantUte -both a44. bi s ntes..dnd p*!!vonal' wilos .drivea in sraoioyer••provid'id wehiolrs. - ;pipes of vehtdIes halve been exempted... !Torn both., the sriedodkiopAna taxation. roquitemeats, They ares 3.. V .. �i) ole>wriy �'.elisr�ked. polka. and lire .vehiolss= (9) 0-0001 s6" so#oroeriope :vehicles, .tihen used -'!dr suthor<lRed' our o s an open tRd br "A",' li�ilr�tis�e ".la?w s�. foroe�ont 0016err 411: dalives ,r #'gtlkd� :.�tlE ssaEib : da y' for •the•{drivor;- or - only for:., •the.-,drivrr, p�rs.r..laidinr:Juap at ,t43 .11otbed:.trucks; ;�); car4ss cstrriirt; _ ,` • ..-!OM.N.jMy/MrYl1ld�MMM94M�A11NN11/� .. � , . a o' 41. - with over a.14 000•pound aepsoity (6) sohool and passenger buses with over a•;25�person capacity; T) ambulances (8) hearses; (9) bucket Aruoks; (10) cranes and derricks (11) forklifts; (12) **%out mixers (13) dump trucks; (14) garbage trucks (15) specialised utility repair trucks (except vans and pick-up truoRs% and (16) tractors. Pick*.up trucks and vans generally are taxable unless specially- modified so that personal use, is unlikely. For _ example a van that has only a front bench for seatingg its cargo ' or -so filled with permanent shelving and a painted insignia would meet this criterion. - ' tiit�hel_nn�� EEgggp�QQ Employers -have the option not to withhold. income, and employment taxes -other than. social security an the imputed value of an employee's personal use of an employer provided vehicle if the employer meets two oriteria..•Ono • the employee, must be notified by January 31 of each year that e employer id _y not withholding. Two, the employer must include the value of the , employee'a'personai..use in the gross pay recorded on the workerfs W-2 form• at• the and of. the year. 'The law implements the recordkeeping standard of "adequate records or sufficient evidence" to support any credit or deduc« .. tion claimed for business use of an employer -provided• vshl.cle,. Examples of,. acceptable substantiation .would be.aacount_)iooks"" ; diaries) logs, receipts# bills trip sheets, expense. -forms or..'_: statements by disinterested witnesses. Reoorda must substaptirte- ; the time6:date# place, purpose and cost of travel.aith..rritfen records dude at or near the time of the expense havin,j,, more probative value than oral substantiation. Employers can use a special accounting, rulo. under whAoh:tho` value or the benefit for the last two wonths'of. the -year :are' - treated so received in the following tax year*-, This: '., rule is. -» ' . - contained in IRS New Release IR-85-TO issued on duly -191 1085: If, a ' tnunioipality has. a . NZLUU policy stctepent :thaC vehicles cannot be used for personal use except for: cosmutinh, •=- purposes .' 'the. substantiation, requirement is :.64tis004 lolloai66 conditions are matt vehicle _ is owned . or leased by .the_ _ .m .q er._�and _ r'_ provided .to one or .more employees= ($).. employer requires, the employee to commuta- to'/�t L fro _ t; - . _Ths,. work in the.vehicle= .^ t )` The employer reasonably believes ;that the em�pployee. doett not, use the vehicle for any personal purpose other-, that; . tot The emplo or -aacounts for . the., 000mutin$'�A use. t�g . bk 16otudi: thr value of -the bihef it in the 0001076416 goss ay) :.and C 5? -There' i 0st . be.:evideho• that would enable'.the. and aos.�QMt*t��q+ whether, the use rof :the vehicle '.met .the ,four praoedtnS-,.trondittnns.p .. k - �. .1j' '_, JF .__•••_-.._.::-�-...�-....---•.s.•.�•:-omv+•�,...._: .__._.,...-Ca — _T ._ ...x..v.c_x- ... .,,.ac�cs-:.r�� _ M :a • 9.ft*2ivbvk Questions tart�ng , n 1965" - complianoe will be traoted by the. IRS tt[Ly�'.jLy�,ou8h a ierles of questions on %at return tore 2108. Taxpa era w l^t_be required: to. report the amount. 'or. personal - use - 411000 .,. ea 3o ' 41� pr,ov-;deg vehieie' and state whether bgsin as, use can y'! bc''_ .iuDatantiated. Oployeas are. ` exPeoted to provld� this anfortation to their -onployers � -who . In .turn We required to. keep. -. there. re or . an file ror corroborative purposes.. ; UWAT aEaEIIT NIth the exception of the o+ategories of _vehicles' that worn' u iforenentioned v : and, de miolmis use defined. as using a vehicle, onlr Done. d no home for bovauting or stopping '-.to • do. as errand on'" ^thi Way ° home state' and._. local employee -provided; vehioiea, are subjeot to taxation'. The rules require that the imputed'valu• of :• Per-aonal use of an . -amployermp.rovided vehicle be. lnoluded In the employeeIs Bros• pay and ' le taxable: for. income* . employment tax sod Social security purposes. . xt a governmental unit has a fleet of vehieios, 20. or.. taro, " a r�oial fleet .valuation. techniques. are .included in the, December :. a . re ulations. 11n' --average fair market _ value can be used if no vehic e.In .the floet,tics.a value in excess of 116t500'. There are three' special' rules that can be . used t; deterMLO " the' . value._ or .personal me**- The 'first is. the 11.50 each . way . rules . . th+, second" .i the : sienuel lease value and 'the third. -It the' 1 oents•per•mi a v�lyatioa- rule. lMP' 141 yers who sisal: to use 'a ' special .v-aluation.. rule:"1n 198d' . must gotify, employees by .:Maroh 19$g7' and. beyond! emploYees must be ,informed of:.a spacial rule '"polootf ou - y Unitary St of . each. year. As a : ,�teneral rile. it.; 1s 011610able ror both' ' the' employer 'and empxdye. to use the same . : rule' ' 'Under .t is :s►p"�rcial rule,. a , rlit, si.-JO each-". xay �i3.00:;psr roati+d�trip: oa"Mgrute.l: ;oan'bo:oh&rged-to!-*Mployeea� Qn+�aell. eeQloy» Age _,who..Bust' r�rspond to : ed alter»hours Boer enoy froar holoe.`ar, a to tih+lrgid pl'.10 �raoh 'way' lrt' addition *--their' ripular "da� �• oeHmw:ta:- This ruin► Daft .only be used It there. -is a written pallor . . p ohibitiag "perdon i : ust :other than comoluting. if more- thapi one ` ; '-beploye��a0iiwbie.l,�[�:-the-�xahiole.�:such:_: ae.:en__,aployer•spcnaored_..._ :. oar or : v ool�.: cacti.. t id�rr 'It"' to be ohwrged the 13.m0.' Anattier ' -, estrioti , e that= �aontwol - +rMplayseaN cannot` us*' thlr' �ipsaiai " rui,a, d ,eorbtrol.. eMployse. is on iepl:ed ptfiaial dr ah iedivxdtsal - - - Oat is: Appointed ;.bar.Mo. eiceouti•ve. and approved bye 1'e6151otive , bode . or an Gin0irldUs# '. mho' -his -- a federal . aounterpatrt that . As `� ; ,�... apoSatieO.:bY tba.,, srpsideet : end,' approved .by the- benote. 8 c oosmutin tar 'ores c 4 __.. Autohh 'made Oval ow _tQr-.: O �thob tt p p cad :;.tiowi :: the vfice o#' .,their .. parooeal use ':cioeputiad'.„by uaiag L m •1 � � � ,a.+ 4} a .,y l u u i- n ft 4s .•a i i R � � the, annual lease value rule CALV)." This is a four -step process. First, the fair market value (FNV) of the vehicle must be established. It the governmental. unit 9XDA the vehicle the purchase prior is. the FNV.,,, The FMV, of an automgbl,le_ that was provided .to an "employee prior .to January .1, `198Qror is JuW may be determined by using the average. retail value libted in a --- nationally recognized pricing guide. .Ono* the FNV Its 'established - -to* stable below which is "contained in the: INS-Decabber" -23► 19"1 regulations can be used to establish the ALV. This ALV is to be used for a four-year periodi atanlatif�teaaewwu nrwal�rw t�rir �nwn�.>r. Wrwalr t a wr tltoee>~M low' mom 110 Y�piR111 oLtolao Mum am no. a lag UOMW am Man an am up MWAM 0" so 40 �Mo 0 == Wo 1 IfAO► ata im llur 1 MVM 4MSAN olooeu�o 1}IIO on up y 1UW � 1 t Step • two...18 to " calculate the difference between . personal 1psineso mileage and to create a fraction the b opstnta refference business useThe numerator of which is the dibetwetnY the total .Mlios and the personal miles driven by".the employoa101 and the denominator being she total miles •V., . 4tep three determines. the .amount of burin-es"s use._bY _.mux,t,i. .. o plying the., ALV by . the mileage . friction. The.. final:." step .ia " calculate the amount.of the.benefit to be included In, the"Sr+ost ' pay of the employer." To do this, subtract the bns naiis ute from L i. ALVI Employse A is provided an ..:automobi'li with _ ....: ! "........and A corresponding ALV `tkQ",34�0 8Q -.. " Frhathon s _ . Espio)ioi - J1"- drove #" total,: 040: mile!►': _: - " - ", - . - - - -. , 2000 " of wh1oh were.. personal .use. t lWootor: ;: , . :10,000 - : 2,000 .* 8 , P buOdness• Miler ' , - • ;, OenoeInotors i0,000 totel --Milos driven' --- 3. Wiliness Uses ALY. X mi ea o fraction, $a, 8so 8,111100 ,40 --A t of tHri` ireN'ef4t to =lie .inciud± d in: roan. anoames - �,_ ALV, "Business " Use - .. I4,89O - .$3,880 . $970 R - .. - •r - .. _ r". .v :,tip,{ i ed i Tho ALL includes maintenance and insurance but not gs,ao- ' line. i! the employer -pays for gasoliae-gither an additional „%5 F ._._:. centi par personal -mile or the.. -actual cost aunt be:added.to the value, of the,tbenelit, t1�d included in�the : eaploy�re!_i noes iaoc�Ma.. i - .. (standard Nileare rate «� y In ` the V*Cosb*r ..23• - temporary. regulations the IRS added �► �,: third special 'rule. The vehicle. vents-pr -0110 'rule allows -- ;y the value of personal use to be oaloulatad by multiplying the. - rof paraonal ailed •driven times the standard mi ea8e Moto - -- - allowance. Presently the standard rate is 21 oast peg- �tilel= l4,r ,-the t'irsL 15#000 s�les� and 1.1 ft *auto. par mile thereafter-.. = This .. Y t atandallyd. rate- ` ocXudes gasol/l_pe, insurance and maintenanc+e.,, {~ the. ah .loyaf does. nob- supply oleo Be the .rots is 1p:5 . *eats :a „ ".. ssihe.'This method van be aae� if`either the veh�ale is regularly used fbr governmental'purposes air is driven 10 QW�ailed:or sore stnnually and has a lair .imarket .value of $12 806 or below': (through' 19e8� Ono* adopted bath the employer and the *spicy** aust,use this valuationtechnique Tor &11 subsequent periods n' .... ;..Nt l a• L joy** A 000 1. standard Mi e p Rate: mpl ye driven 20� u- 1 person riles and 35i000.business milks. �,..;. a a e r' t o a 3 1 standard a►ile Ott al_ ow nc ' for, he pars. n 1 n 1es . 5� p driven to 21�cents for the first 1.3.i000 ad `11 gent* ' _tor the, re i i 6: s.000. N 2. Amouat of ben*fit to bit Included In gross inoose-.its = $ 91 1 000 mila�r..1 :21 o 113,150 .:+ Plus t �,. -- - -' f rag -o��awibOuxaEseorg ... .. 38 ,700' total personsi Oe%efit a ev ovsly': mentioned. eapl.oyere oen :,alioose mot to wlt>7hold. taxta :other than' sooi�rl' saaurit . if they, , notary Lhe .employe* by: ry yy nusry ' 1 or each year of - his li otion And toport the ta�bxe �-- -p*rsonal isse,• asount oa thin W4.. The 000101 seq�urlh�r-.taxes:rsu�rt gf �rlthheld. but .can, be: resitto,d 'mn an annual Oasii. Thy MMopnt - of ohs tiiaiertL ahold _: Oa : iriaparta,' in `b�o�c 40 of 'thy yZ xNi�ra .gtp_ooLtier_.:aoa►pNrsatiba,_ iri 'box 1.01 end' In box ti,► _ __._. Saeauriicy':. Wa irk -i#.:.t4ri=-dcvrnaabtal ctnit parLR�olpt*. ► the goo Ly sys bee. • .,: , .. . ",po ' 2npioy0ri 'thM1 ah`oosa to iMold. ban do so evvery PPay psr�od rl ::. f, or err, ,a`quartslrly ,..ski-annui�ainor, annual bsi�ir` Thi-wl,thtra�lding n prdoediras are • e1tp1ed in IRS News 2elaase $5�7.0 dated Jl�r •i9, _ cal �'preatit"Iboera:.: ony {..lied the fol1o0lot, . or yring+�• Bpnetita =tyres. ,, G doetumeets 4e19fu1 and::, R*bn aL�opi.. «,�wsWar-$ �tanuary 1'� 1985; �►at:c u �... _ : r nI r ; <; o d 7 µ D...V. I� 1 T47 'February"20, 1985, page, 7038November 6, 1985 page. 46O64, baopmber 23, 1985, page ¢22$1, available by writing 10.,the Government printing Offioo.400kstor6 710'.North Capitol Streit, N.N., 'Washington, D.C. 204011 tt) »Repeol of Contemporaneous ,-R*oordk*eping Requirements,ft available by..- writing _ ,to the - House Document Room: 1N22 , U.$. House of _ Re resentat4ves, Mamhington, D.C. 20515. This document contains - P..4.. 99-44 _slus..con4resslonal . instructions to the. Treasury on how . the rogulations should be written*., • Ad�o:dd�, D�tin�tignn . A*_ Automobile «► any ..four -wheeled vehicle manufactured prinarlly for use on -public streets, roads, -highways. . 2. Clearly, marked: pollvm and fire vehicle a vehicle owned or leased by a governmental unit that is required to be oommuted in by ,a police officer orfirefl hter►. .who is on. call .when not working. The vehicle is clearly marked , if Pthrough- a painted insignia or 'words It isreadily apparent that the vehicle is a polls* or. ` fire vehiole.N 00vernmental license plates alone will ' �.satisfythis r�quir*meat. . .3. Law enforcement officer • on individual who is ag�ptoyed .,op a ' full-time basis by a tiovernaental .:unit ", #it is, responsible for the proven on or Anv*stlgati*" of aria* involvin injury to persons or property (lno•lud ..lag s p'prehension - or • detontion - of persons '•for- suc,h crimes), who is authorized by law to carry hr'ssres,, execute search warrants., and to make arrests (other thap merely a oitisenfs .arrest),_ and who regularly ,.x oairlo6 firesrms .. (exc*pt when it is not possible to do ;1 sa';440013se' of the requirements of undercover work).' Th :term *low enforcement of -floor" way include-an.arson. ino*stiaator who also meets:"the requirements of this . Qualified specialized utility repair trunk— -say 1,ruok, (not ' including. a van .'or plokup. tr�Ak):4peaifloally: designee and . A ed. to sorry. heavy., ..tools,.: testing..... - . `' equipment, or pirtw if— : Q (1) The shelves ranks, or other p*raanet~t .: Interior construotion which. has been' install� ed - to ::. sorry: . sad 00ri 3No-h-ltesv�►' ::i�dair t#�. . - .; mu h .that ''it '. I'm uhiikely that.." the. #rirok will, ' mar- p'a!d e : than : a de wioi�mip: amount 'too"'' p*rrorial. ptwrpoal'es, and O The, employer requires.the 46pl6yes ,t.o 4r1-ate .; the .trunk home In order. to. be. able to res .oasl. im sMerpbacy. '. si.tuations. -or foie "pyr oso�y:.iif ' restoring or: :aaiataiaing -eieotrioiy alephone 1:Y .. Mater.,..•sewer,-or step, Di ., 'A&AA&--. 105 MIMWA4 WAY, SlMit 10t KJ M' ALMA "N" LE-GISLATIVE BUREAN March 2e; 1986 Items of IstensE INSURAt1C6 POOLING SI1LS START TO MOVE . Legislation that would isles to.fotne taaurattq "ponN"- inched closer to beeming law last week. 0n Friday* tb ii or and Ooseesae Committee Considered IM 506. That bill, by Representative Robin Taylor of iirangell, contplRed two sepeeate eta distinct reotions. Mon' first proposed the establishment of an "Alaska Reinsurance Fund", 16 ab would provida selususaaa to Senurecturare and service providers rouble to nacre relanrcaxce from the commercial .tantra ck market. The Bacot. section of the bill would enable muaiaipalitles and school districts to•tolu .la+Waan "pools". i -. Tdr cows Puna the Dill oua, oaa ow ww.o ...,. a - - aed. . ref9reel Judlaiit:y was To as IM 702, and raaeiwd a oawitCee to nAlaska Ralnsusince Nnd" Rooli�+ remain as CNM 506 and tt iva0 a d Ftaaaae. The enabllne l■M••■� for munlcilul imm- of the Labor and Cwmiarae CassittM. Tha bill ai with" is f e i pA$8" sacommendatlon from members note, nos to In the 8owa Judioiars_ itteo. {' ban strongly urged passage of '1pooling" legislation for aeverd yeses, Cad to wq suolf is favor bays net yet bna sahaduiad for -as lawsbull ' r= of of C811s sf16. The League tom no position on H0 M. Hearings Nike Millar has indicated be . would I to to bold ';' :" either bi! i tbaugb Hours judiciary Committee Chaimn insurance bills, including CM 506, within two woks. geaaral haarltip an l� . � i Op the Beasts ai�it, SD 404 by Josephson took a atop forward lest rack as well. Test bill, in'ito•-awrreot On but only foe propartir t* eltuts th gas form, would Cigna santieipalittee to form Insurance pools, out of the Senate Labor and CawsrCe Cowlttee, and !s oure+BtiEiy .!a the 8saute } gaaerrp. she will was passed Finutae Cowittee, but has not yet been scheduled for a public !easing. In. additlat. Co post"fa' ptioW�► it tine and non 1 0 oa olio! . The .LeapMt a eaaewa f insursn p � ;� _ h SD 404 contains seetiono on the eaaae supports�eho sieaMM# epo 404, and amendments tint would expand the "pooling" langusp to laoluda all sypfa ;' ".•, A!d 811RV1i4 RESU6T8 SHON Il�Olt'tAl1C6 OF L�I8tJ1TI0N • Tire ldeaaue sent a '!'Lgislatian. Survey" oat .3#ot' Month, that responded have been included with this "HrlUtii►". , .. _ ad the, results Iva the 28 municipalities • ;.. , ie JapMarq►, 20, 1986.' Tfis mayors dv MORS or IN JUtiISAV -The Alaska Conference of -Mayors • mat .4au, spaoilic 'it lsliElaa•"'` resolutions on sAid. - -- `- tiRd rewnus Wawa from Senate prerident-Doa.SMett, parsed several _ ct+ag�ad the drte of the.�r a�xt Msri�� fromApril 17 to the_2A. .. :. T. - - �, b'�:: S�tlste lrer�dsot 'smmtt told the mayors hie views of the 81 billion shortHil over the 1 4 f140 without hurting tbr.peop .. - _. 'challeaga, he aside will ba sustaining the rple of govetnmeut Million dollars on. the table. In eaxtra" funds, sannott thinks it "Id pa used to atsit s"t Million thin yam.#:Mi�ilioa T 4 the Molina over the next fW .Yesra. He favors rutting the.bndgot:8�00 t%s booed including rawnw storing, m'"C"sl ersil�trms, sdwaatibe aiti _ . . q _• next. Hr"predicted a 10% out.soross the capital. budget. 2hd a�syori-Who the lmportan n of the oparatlttp .funds oven;,: if - It Mjtnt ra4Y4 i�i' �becaupa Nl11 trot be able" to afford bighsr ✓ . v o the capital ".budget in order t0 maitain. Meat we have, and" people, �— _f E "1 • Usialative Bulletin a14-38 2 . March 389 1986 1 MsOludone adopted by the eeyonI } s 1. Asking the islature and Cowrnotor support the forward fundias concept for municipal assistance, nvenw Shariss, School foundation, and school construction prosrmw. a 2.,Asking the Lesialature and the Governor. not to sn ppost 811 36 or iB! 91 aliowins P>5118 credit for unused sick leave. l hf A. Iftins the Latisleturs not to chimp the present applicability of public MP1oyaS ' Mlations Act to ! +� sanicipalities, nor in any wager to restrict the ability of elected councils and asserllias to establish local a 4 ��j policy matins to U041 labor relations. _ A. *$in# this Legisiatura to develop a stronger support ad advocacy systen for the Haber ind4atry. - , � � cage D:' r :educed capital imprevodentS project fundins as a sathod to svintain applropriatione for Mioipnl assistance and school foundation funding. . : AsSip,•pa Most resting of Os Alaska Conference of Mayors will be in Juneau, April 94. Mayon ark raeiadai , -to -pay -their'AW dues. ALASl81.. D NLC N! lINO IaSAR SAD NgiiB ANL president Dan Rack led a dolehation of aine other , r 4laskes to. Wshinston D.C...to' attend the National League of Cities CongteSalohsli-Cities Conhrenco. Over ' .J_ $,000 Sttendad the arstln� to discuss key fadstal 'Issues affe0tias local sovernr nta mom.. the eounto, and . to deliver the rutioa's cities leglOstivill priorities to the Adsinistration and Carnes (included in this SM top isawS were the hderai deficit, federal budget cuts, and tape rofogs, $� Senator bakowski, although he hu Signed as a co-sponsor on 8. 318 revothorislas and "t"4118 revenue -• s Sharing foe's years at the carhnt lsval, was not hopeful that ens lesialottio would•pees. Ne news -to pear how• tMOO Snt that V"IM is to your- 8sator NurkoveM also asked AlasMas tO-,pr'ovtde his with infometon . oe hqr the tart WOVI f -prcposds will !Spat!: Alaskan in terse of coat,. loos of jots, I of' proleets ste. C"S"Sarsa 900 YOuas yes NOW rsepOnSlve to tbs Memo of the Alaskan samieipal dolegatei. . ,._ _... Y.,�,. .. hl► OutMrt'dly Supports the OUSS M of federal revenw sharltgl however, ha has -not-Signed on,asa 0 -,sponsor 4. 610ar H.ie. UN Or N.jl. 796, lesiSiatiaa rsauthorisins and sxtandias rav�aw shatiing-for 3 and 3. yam,. respectively, She Congresnaa supports treating all federal budget expsnditaras -to we the Graverw%odow ' Wssts (case NLC Priorities).. Na was syspathag6c to the 0eacsraS• of rswiciOai Oftioials over-theproposed taa,refors lesislatiOal :1� in fact, he voted a ethist U.N. U34 because of ths'irpact on bonds. .. , ` genitor Stev"O' waM in 1esS.. o cats hO�sfpl for relief or fairness to toesl sowromts on the effaces,. of:faisTO ' , :. �.. andsets Sad• tax nfOna. M has not Signed as a co -Sponsor to S. - 318, but said tat revenue shoriat will.•. Sot. -IA elirinated but will be cut. As for tax refeng'Itaveae acid hs vas concerned,ovej"the cttace's of the daps ' ad" aa►•goverareatai bonds' on Alaska. „ V io• CQas"ss _, Vill Aw .ow .alter. break until April .7. 'Manic 1" otfiOialS should Oak tow our 8snatorta •and Z`oM.04MSn'si support on •thtjo Jmbnl isaues _ f� _ affietiag 10061 governwne when • Sad . if- -they rotor to -Alaska„ Iprit* this parted. YisAt end '!'o su,,aggl olticials .an as, aoocanwd cut -may tbat-tka astio}t fait- bs. : : r+ndnead.:2bs deficit nose be reduced falely# and not at the.expenq ct,federal psosraar.eo.aitles aged ae,the 6IMPAS•z of the fadonl/local pa "OrShip. General revenw Shasat out not be opt .further .-in FT .lfa4 d l Mat a• ty-6406" tad (Or FF -190:' 'Gup daletatioa should adppot't d. 2074 or N.J; Ma. 341ro* S13,_ rajeatin ens .th6 8aferra'ls' (Alaska. -has: bald up fundins for. two yeard' and d6firrois' in IV". tundiaO*'y luf11I% c ... b6 unhi�fn): .Ask our senators and con sages to 4ts Supoert tbs .deduatibility_ of state .Sqe,-lodai :U jirisarvins the. tax-"nrpt Status' of traditional public . pu purpOes OoMih• and a de;aysd sffectiv6 +kErt „Gs4 of Y. this_ it Included tag d�itli6,' Sponsored by Senator Bt "bsrgsr (axaapt that the State cap Vitt (still p*ODlw -for the State of Alaska). - �� It ' , J� � , - - „ . . !.. _ 1 . . , .... ' ' V • --,_ -�•.... 'A� ' � __.._—_ �_. ra.�_—,-�-•-�.n�a-•��`��.�-�__'T'1,�-4s�."x.`�^"Tc=•-•I--�—_�'4..-..'_+m-�."'�.J.T.•.^r'�'_-`�".._;—r-_.__... s.. , , l - o ., j ` Lsgislativo aulletin 014.28 • 1 - Mash 26, 1156 !W •._ Souse 11111.332, tort rafons, is aaoiep behind schedulep but louse Labor and Covl orca Casaittse Chsirsaa Mike Navarra plane to rove a coamitt*s substitute bill out on Tuesday April lot ... w fooling. She bill, by Representative. $oar Cotton..of Bogie !fiver, and Me ban the subjoat of as Intense lobbying effort, on - -v both $idea. as SM94 official juliey as klle Issue roads 1%W leaps urges do Legislature to review tort F. mots and. to. work for aviable ,a nicipal Insurance, systatti. . The Labor and Cameras Cowittes hu not tirtaisly-%tvan 0 312 a tboreuah ieview, ad asong the fallout bas base the moweaent of MSNMG • IUD ruckus- 1140 the "!buff Judiciary Costeittse (see waisted article €o this Bulletin). !respite "rhe_ relatively } " low profits the •Iaspe has token on tort =font the bill reflects a thorough rwtw of the tort rolovo _.:.. _1" loam by the legislatttra, and reflects similar actions balsa taken across the country. The proporad ahsnrss- will beaeft extreftly important should legislation powittiea insursuce pooling pass, ad the League estsblsob" a mnaldipat Insurance pool.. 21e loop* staff believes the bill should be supported to _110t of t All!. policy. It is Isporta:t that ladividual munioipalittes contact their legislators and indicate their t.: support or other view directly. n following to a review of the major points of Bb 512, a it currently stands !a the lfonee Labor and COMICS Cosmittes. now of the following actloas are assured of being In the final 144 Comeittes $ubstitum . Punitive Daseaat She bill would sake it sore difficult for a jury to award punitive d$nape by raising. do Wrft of proof. from "preponderance of evidanes" up to "clear and convincing" Mach to the htahsat standard of proof in tM oivll coact system. If evidence ere found- In a am of punitive chubs to. be "oloer. and : - coevineina", the dwsgs assent would be split SO/SO between the plaintiff ad the State cannot fuad.. *0 bill would preclude,'hew*wr, the Seats foam joining sob a twit is as effort to via puoitiw dapspa... ,. Iatxxloatad Maintiffat If a plaintiff was found, by legal dsfinitionj to be under the influence of dnys or. alocohoi at the ties of the accident, and It the plaintiff$ contribution to that harm was found to be greater . t ` lbao Sob, the plainlff would be barred from say rscovsry of dsmsps. tl: I ti%wit,P,As$r�WI A judp could require periodic payment schedules to sat for oases whwo damagay, exceed ` _ ' ? S"pWO: fed that those paysosts would continue to the estate of a plaintiff, should to die before the satxt+r i obliptice Is. m t. <; &!mated tiabilityt" 2he'Lespe has been apparently successful in insereiog lospage into the bill tbat'wogld a great -elected and appointed officials of a politieal.subdiviston of the stets, issunity, tram Liability for actions, ors; dtgission to seta in the course and scope of official duties•.' Boat deaf not an*pt local I' • la officials from liability for acts of gross neglipaas. The loaawp also Includes school boo" saw1ors and. ' �' superintendents. J ^: � Coae�rib,^uitortr •sines If a plaintiff were found to be particlty at fault for an accident, his pareeatep of. fault would also be subtracted from the dosage amount. Collateral ftaa!ltes This section would allow. the defendant to Introduce oviaencs of benefits already paid to this plaintiff,. and that squat would then be deducted from the sward. In slspl*r, tenet it would . q llWante double dippft -from both the plaintiffs and the defendant@ insurance coverages. - ice :one Sav�aml Lfasl� l This @eatsan will have A tvmadow lmpstt on mmiolpallties, aad: sit, entities A r �tewtd ".@ a Currestly, s dafead*nt aaa be , liable for V t► of a "4NP pie" • aaeep .award, ew.a tRah he r soy be found to to only Sr at fault, depondlna on the other.defsndauts ability to pay the award. Under thin bill,: a-party=.fowd• to-bo- loos than SO!► at fault -could.-dat'bo bold'llable for. was than-,twlcs--twt.psrart►tsgs.. R " of -tbe award. for instance, a party found to be at _fault. could be '!!able for .no. trol'a ahae XG%. of the apsrd..: A- party --found. ta.-be SM-at fault, �swvst,..aopiA._1� liable te+r Up to. tt►e. full atAapio_t►t. lira- a+t�+d.; - - -�� _. efts �i Molasses Mon "s party is relsees0 tram a suit, for any sss@on, the dollar amount of that $earns$ vog1d to deducted ft" the total_ awardo l i� lour �lust@u Thii seettan ettempts to dleeoutage frivilous demege claisr by levying a Sb.le"nst L peo$lty pas year 'spigot wbo rejects's•4eNnte offer to settle, than does Act win an amount archer � ado offer. in court. Titer interest penalty to retroactive to woh a case to . the data -of he, a"t aosmittss of referral for . the bill is Rouse Judiciary, which has acht4uled ssoticpl oo insurance bills beginning itodoesdayw April 2. C$$B $77, the :Bonste ,tat Wave bill,.-:io in the $seat* Judiciary Casuirhe aoa iiil3 rsaoiw.,its s?irati"public hsairltua drew. ea Zhorsday,• Agri! S . a}w iulletin. sl4-M. ' o ` i agialrtive Bulletin 014►28 - 4 - March 48, :986 1 ACTION llll�llBST6D 111 CSHS 506 and CSSB 4% -� INSMWO POOLING FOR "MCIFALITI68 , The yMe dudi�aiary COsnittee now bees CM 506 !n comittee. Ihovok no public beating has yet been Nike Hitler he# indicated he will bear the bill le the on two Mahe• The -bill Would Acheduled, Chaim" allow nunieipalittes to join together to peal their insurance PURIM$ cad to use the pool to cover each 4theri louse, and to wta 'funds !roue the pooh to P=Vbass reinsurance. Tate Alaska Municipal laws has Balked for enabling legislation 411OWi08 Posliag for averal yesra. Ibis year, we be" lfuir chance. rotors than of the importance of this bill . d Plea" call or write mobsrs of the 8ouss Judiciary Caeaittes, end to the aVaIIALlity and affordability of insurance to munioipalities. The webere of the cOMtttee are as �► _- foliant• p 6 Ctuiltnsnt Rep. H. Nike Hiller 465-4990 Vice Cheirs Rep. John Strad 465-4919 Rep. Dent cloasin 46S-3704 Rap. Han Cruabers 465.496E i Rep. Frets PettyjObn 46S-4937 Rap. Randy Phillips 46S-4%9 -- It". NOW Taylor 465.4905 The original sponsor is Rap. Taylor. Rep. ftmberg is the co -Sponsor. er crunch COS 404 by Josephson has beassigned to the Boats Finance COemittae. In turn, the bill has been ehougb over to a sub•coabittse headed by Son. Rick Nelford. No bearing has been Soheduled for the n owsp ;; the indication ie it will to heard by the sub•oon itta with in the RUL tune woos. Tice Alaska. Hootbipal . loops Strongly SWate this bill, bovever, it does need to be expanded to really add"44 ebe--problerse amieipslitbS are having acquiring available and affordable insurance. Tee bill, in its eurr"t,fa n,:Vould`•: -to allow sspticipalities to pool only for property insurance. To adequately provide 4040. mi e . bill should be expanded to includO all types Of insurance. Tale could easily but " tsuaicipalitiee, the sccosplishad-.by deleting reference to "property" to tha bill. Please ooaeact Sett. Matforl (46S-4906) and ' urge his expeditious handling of this important piece of lsgislation. _ ROUSE ACTION gg 554 • Setting speed limit and nsighboriWOd speed stoner SUNAflslxa and Transportationpbssed.CBa,Ear 6 $52 this Volk. It of gene to Finance. It requires on to consult with nrmicipeiltitieS, and rtaigh�. orrsuu!*stioni• dhees rpPropxiate; who setting a"" limits. _ He 697 • FfobOsving ssmioipal sales tax on Mood $tog pumbasess CSFA push- out SAW Monday with ;s sore fiscal ntota-and a nsjority 4140 Pass". Now goes to.l>888.__..._.:. ...... ttd' 374 ,r. Pa regulation Of vehicles for hirer Judiciary •passed a CS for Mg !76 vlth sriior .t' rriiibt�r: Referred to Aules.. 11S $111 - School" roeetruction liaitat HERB parsed out d Cg for I s36 Mitts major .duunges. prinoipili)►r tlw CB ranches the review, by"DOT, 04 parnits aunicipslitiee• to kssp .interest earnod::on boWo,.!'-T6.h'ill_'Woo :.. hard in ChM on itednssday. It dust still go to FlaSacs. Conots. and poettionr icon 60hiC44littis err to get thedebt ltlnit Ugi�lseton throgob thlrr yir� r sparol, .and these iS. a push by the Sdainistration a He: S67 •" itbitidip�l lama bttitlensrttat C6RA pniseed. out • _CS for 0561 ritb ..sajas blot tt1�Airnriy „ebarltas. Igt`iwt is a bill got. MMIoipalitiser -and ofAw d be aupportdd. For the r "Od, •tfie insyrisrf3cint good ivs twngute asked'Now; clarification that the legislation does act 'affeat .Ma. still: uxtr �ea Leese:of•.Prwiowty, saluted and Approved . aleations' of motel health Ilmd.. Referred to finance.. :Y V �.F " tsglststiw tuliattn +►1+1-1H1 - s Notch Ze, 1956 i It a. A6 647 -'Taporting end inspection progsass for hazardous MtsridS and wets: State Attain paand out a C8 x, for kv 447. S'he bill addresses an Al l"lution to the same offset. no" to still S cancan ant sae . t s - isiainift-" soon" in the bill and the liability it way have an sualcipalltiu.. Reforrad .to. TIMMA. S SUM ACT10N Il M 40k1 - Ilipht to fare the Senate passed p 409 (ife•) an hider, A/1ii86. it Mo out to epa !louse iAo .' rs[osrod to Ciil11 and Ra•ouress. 1"00 Stott I" testified in the Oousi on similar ilgislaEioB� .Seeking _ .. clorlflMtion that the peaption lanymp to asunicipal ordinances does :Act . "Plus on .this rw atc!pei• tin f -•� =-" Of plaimini and saalaag.. iii !have been aswrad that the intSat is for lapis user at►4 only for aouisrueehl. _- - - - . j±k p8 470 . ilfleabe of oil ad hazardous substowast passed by the "me last reek, CM. flint. a• was read , _ _ g• i by the $suits tot the first tin Bad rsferred to Retloasaea and riwnao. y YZ 'Sf Riot to bear atrSt the Senate passed CS for SA if (Jud) on 3/261 60 is spits of, two. intent ;. lrzi~ to the !resolution$ than to still concern expressed by Senators and the Attoraaer Gaaral over tors u rwiftaatiosar of the laaSwp it approved by the voters i.e. carrylag a ooncaalod wa>ibpon.ale. yy. %;i,:'y_ SUM slaw a OMM 0 " 95 11i - 1.8 m$ the Governor has signed Swats CS for C8 for IM 111 Crop), Chapter No. 8, ltJ1' 1986. - ` _ ; ' �A •l1 �Con�tames Us you Be 4po10tsd or elected official or profesrionsi pilunuer Biacabiss for " iy pafM wye or lrprov�its to existing ntta$ for irpiswantiag tta Scalar r 4 oti)eatlwe .qt YOW coaiOa40 s w 1SM we pleat it so; this conferezas ie for rout !sae aonferenes will "ptovids a foss :for s>ichihaagin$ ; • _ ,�, .., ,.; plaeaing slaps=lens/, tachaica! Information Bad' aaev !doss/how approaches. - In lanQ as plemrin�. tM srjaor . Mhpbasls will bl► on this aethode used by Alaskan cosy amitiss to lepleweat land us* plans. tps�ih*;� Mill 'M faagosi tluaiSipailties #iroaslaO.Alneklh and All teiciudo piSnninp Stott Eras tihe,*At eipat-nud bsgioaad:Aulatenci . . Dlrltaion, remifit of OorrMlaity. and klsgiceal Affairs. this` speawrs will discuss lab .use problem epscitio ;r twtheir i_a i `, ebe techniques or skills they are vein$ tO sows ptrobl�Is1. s kL r t!M agp to aca is sa hoduldd for Apr!! n-30, 19s6; at the , Hotel CaptSiq Cooke ).A Aa�Olasaxeh. e+n tal we, ` Wqr. ksistrart�oa tie, bYn,, pre`rogi•tratlsn to syaasfed: TMre will is.;aa lnpalMtea tw for:.aueale daj: -- caefeia+ e..io_.:tp4tl!_orsd by that. 0opsrprtrit.of Coco nity and OW81 sl Affairs to aan)uuction ,ritb the At= _ T r s —'t $ - - - :F r 4} '' _ t$tap�}�r o! ebe:-il�h ria"- Planing MaootBtioa. to> wori lafo atioii, plN/i. aont"t ttl• Unlwlrait�► e! p -" __- r: *'s Aartia•1o!>tbsuks, cenfx+az.'aua# Coatiaulat ltencBtioa st 474-7lt00.- _� .-. . _ -fhb tbnialpal 'Ha nce officers Aaoapfotion of AlssM e111; bold tAalr a , ,' •. ..�laaace�,,, Ot„to,•,�srs�,,;�Sarinr tton�arsnne � r r •Pt i caaferakil !a geotek, fty 1■S, 1.966. Solt boliol' le 04 udiak . Hkhoft!lrW. lioet�fe...�i•tratia�v"tor. ' shirt' `.bqfors' Apr}l 10 1• $S0.00i :dos-•eabsss; .!}f0.00t Contact ibis►' 1Nspd1, </lninnao'l►i�ndtor. Ciey 'of q�}ldatoo - bCtf1A beam Nat cut . ai •draft , ital Costr+hot GsideboolR"toe • rsviaaer The' Cap Son • - ' suldet►oote eeatalni inforeMabioa _cq : to.rco sictolaMt .1 oeeestiheotIon . s»tbads' of coptraet sanistraustioe, . aigfit ti4weiues: eri r4alueetiid by April is' it YOU with to"re�eolva► i.copy asf etwh h Control, pse+sietlnp� end„p1aSe►fing• c►.cP#kDc u,in, f?unew ,("54707J.le aQAi''1s 1►aidlnRY#. cit)r inaovalloils Cbdte#'�ihlaoe,:Mq► .lest at -tAe Sty Adth q► q ttis aoasreh>b in d.rtlgnepthsrat - o �' tiesnR#� .��` � —. �� : " - ' � aoigtious- :to `/aw•roa � tens• laced-�Ncahl �pveih"iairsdra,,y Coats _ . .... d w Shwes i�whpUatiMs �, - _ _ •amp. .. r . � . , � Y b � it r.1. ` •a T _ " .— ;-v' fit. -�^-5 A .. .. { Legislative Bulletin e14-28 6 - March 28, 1996 �' �� � NOUSB HBARINSS/NSSTINGS _ .. _ _ n CSRA Capitol ).- 3100 .e• Nd 325 - Town Nsasting RM Mle Misiolpalities Vedasadry, April 2 r }' a mm - Pambs Not Private Nuisance _.... ... itation on eicipal Deb! 93 521 • LleMa Thursday, April 3' ND 293 - Mnloipal Pinsaoial BeargsnCY Coswission NB 673 - Transportatima Rasardous Substances in M PtCiPalitiss � ,.. I M 521 - Lieita!!on on Rmialpal Debt Friday• April 4 a 293 - "Alcipal numoial Menway Comission Friday, April 4 i HB 466 - Aluiran Resident Preference Na S87 - Nmaiaipai Land Entitleaenta ' 8i8s • Capital 112 - 030 os." WaWassday, April I ' Na 694 - State Support for Education i M 3173— state Support for Education M a*.- State Support for Education -- NB 637 - State Support for Education 5 ;:. ICIARY • Capitol 124 - 1a30 o.as. linwrance Pooling ilTsdnssdsy, April 2 4: Bg R Pond and Insurance SB 532 - Liasitations an Civil Liability (Pending Referral) NB 702 - Relating to Insurance - Tort Won/ Insaasmee Bills Continued , April S. Tort Mfoee/ Insurance Bills Continued 1rldry, l . _ . SW 126 • NO Conveyaacs of Nsntal Mnith Trust lead !lonOaY• Ap�1 7 . Tort Mtors/ insurance Biiis Continued �xsdey�.April,8o . - 1R Tort Mfoias/ Insurance Bills Continued Tbussdars April io ' LCAtIs SPECIAL COIMTM- Ca tol 519 - 3130 SS • hrosoting southeut Interne With Canada Nsiw.ear. ►OL 2 i �` =t - .._r___ aa417 - Amml Regulations= subdivision Intonationi1ONE ay li � - AtPAIRB ftiml 1024 3000 Rim, _ .. _ _ : , . - �i-'-=•_ -- -- �- ..` itsdnasda►�►, 'April 2 ' - i. - - -,-. 00 672 - Notice of Ns>iardow Materials - 11 itsad P.E.It to Municipalities - : SP.NATB NEARINes/ma _„ #�i ( MOM" `� suts�ch��,R130 D"a�• �i :A�1 * • � �D;3t7'• Tort Rsfon _ - .Y 1 , .. Jl.y m--�---_.�._.—:---7>�.--�••-_.cu.,.w>:aa7L�-- -, �.L�+—^.'.'�,'yrs.> c— ...r . �i �� .: T r 11 t ! Ls outiva sulletia 014.28" 1 - Haub 28, 1"6 swii d 1301 PWWiM" JM►M WNW OWA MS 1. r, F"-1 � yWNtlfpWnR�C"WIGa a '14 ♦ 20004 y yor�a c•1YR�� e owl a-w a -LrM, OWmv. Cacao > > p�nNUP Iueo - PRIORITIES FOR AMERICh' S CITIES 9 U ADOPTED By THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS or TRR - NATIONAL WAM OF CITIES ' .. March .9,' 1906 A.- . aontimlid - foderal-local partnership with- the nation!is. alitiss is essential to American . growth- and oconoxio � • ��pportinnity. ,. h Bscal^tiitq„ lediral deficits, debt and the growth of poverty have hurt the nation and havr put a cloud over our 'future" 'The National: I►460e of Cities' highest priority"for t they fifth o seen i aar--ie substantially- reducing that 'deficit in a ; fair and balanced manner ? consistent with national needs'. -and: priorities', consiatent With :the financial :ability of municipalities ' to �s'sume� greater respousibilit "!or roc di,nq'- the r ,y pp balsa public -facilities andl services critical to the 'cation, and . - nsistint a the importance of investing. natianal ,1 00 with a imp rtanc { : 4sources- -i.n those -people who most need our 1p.-- ' -- 01 count is as strong as its w*akast li»k., oar" lnioipe iaies.' . 5 are the links .which' bind the nation, • the pieces in .which thr: ' o Wority of. our. childten are barn and raised, tho 'foundation. . ch our, ica»o is •.bVilt. Our cities are oha ad frith the y s , •.upon yhi ` mX ., protection of ..: tour Qikiaens' hosith� a��iYaty : a .: �►�rlfara. .TharefOre, . -Our.. national bU096t should ensure our cities,'.. abili�Y tip, pi^o A, cnnomiri '.: oppiystuh lsy :and eiaploymit�t : fbr - aitie+rns -' cf should insuxe a solid, mat - Crumbing It �111d-`it fit, U_uature upon which our -ratio»ai: ' -economy sha>x1A ensure that VcisEting. 'infrastructure and s�►rvir�e incase , art onaa s► pin :propose a. -constructive s9luti:nn an cider'. gg 'to'-:a11bw ,the Congress- to et "On ..0 bthrz pressing fisuis . wniah . anding risis of -the dofieit'.- h rarC {ytl - harre.l.been '.�.gn01`�d. .4� �w .L lfttelatl" sulletivi 0,14-28 March 28, 1986 �-Uvo to the Gramm-Rudm&n-Hollings 14tv- we urge that As a.n', altirn& the Administration ',propose. and Congress adept a- responsible , the Te bud"t , play -Ior, which it' is accountable. urge that 'Congress to Z .'givo. careful all Adminiatration scrutiny and expenditurestax* 44foasof entitlement and domestic. we:' rqMV04"d Congress freeze. all expenditures at. their ..,that present for. interiswt:.on .the debt,, .social .security bolAls and nesdo-tested pVaqMM&-'! Ns-bolievo that tax reform should not be revenue neutral and we LW reoomsend t4at at least a portion of new federal revenue gained be used -to reduce the"feaskal deficit,` As ai Vr*r#qutSjt& to ..any proposed. spending. - oil - -A . to qa re incisagop the AdulAistration . and Congress - should be - required increase foderal-'revenuet. we raccomend thet. dedicated trust 'funds be 'removed from. the Unified -federal budget. These funds must not be used to 'reduce the Cedera), dotioit.. 106 '. ur go that Congress And the Administration ensure sufficient: funding to the state and local govegMents for any., " federal . OhdatOwR We.) that Cong ress should restore and henceforth proserire ,r*Oq=*jjd intact - tb* authority and -capacity of states and municipalities to rol":thoir own - revenues * includiftg.. maintaining itax exempt.. b 44 tt_v - nf- nt&" tor meet - - basic needs end nd increasing municipal responsibilities. our - national *%injoi0aipriority programs are: .4. the -n4nicipal. clean- water. #rqqrM J u c C_ �- ` tt Oft. A itshwAyls. - - - -.--public housing. 'TPA thi,' notion, init the ationo d44t"0MAX:a. :t4h,"naili number :;pf-.: y#aro,,.f 00 -:'.the 171--Ii( -06pabilitki ..p)rotqOt: th6s h "are. i6ilst - A b*14 91' baize .'and Orene'r-VO _4 -iiii cesw"MOpiih. whicfi: in" OaJ x, ,: tionstruct" a doign, and -oure. 40*ewtio poli4.. e7 — // -t .• __._ . mot_ -. _ - \C� Sic• bo .. - .. - ., -.: ------ - -- - -_ sea -pass 10s AWNIMA .war, Is07) 2 2n?a3Q, MVFAU,ALASKA 9960r of i� ! . , ._ ,� cif/` -# •' a' sL��� r � '11fi rasulte .of . the Lague sur M show that state and federal .:eveaw sharing funds a p our _ ;.. :., Municipalities and their resident*. Reductions wlli translate directly Into higher taxes sad/or raduad ! -' seievites. The impact Of 'Other legislation proposed at the state and federal level is, for the most part, taosrtaia at Mat. VA &UNU'retaived 28 responses to its MAgislation Sure 9 sent to all mimber mayors is . ' ---'--- - Februa galew an the results wbiab wa anions _ q age you to we in letters to your represeatativts is ' Washington and Joan, and with the press, to press them to help the League and you on these hey legislative portent of Kilo.. to.. : �. .�::-o Source o! Mtds NuMioicalitp-Yes MII86 Eadeet (mate) Replace ltnaW9 (fra�Aae) ��....�� State Revenue Sharing Aorcughs 11.8 (25.9 - 4) 2:x. (4.2 • .$) =n ": Moms Role Cities 12.4 (23.9 - 6.4) 3.9 (9 • 1.4) First Class Cities 9.7 (20 - 6.7) 3.0 (4.9 • 1.6) Saaad Class Cities 26.8 (42 • 4.1) n.a.' (Ggle - 7) Overall 13.2 3.1 Municipal Assistants . gore 0 10.3 (1901 • 6.2) 2.3 MI • 1.4) Home Yale Cities 14.7 (1900 -'9.3) 4.2 _ First Class Cities 14.7 (39 - 6.7) 3.1 (3.5 • a.4) Second Clue Cities 20.3 (37.9 - 8.2) a.a. (6agle - 1) overall is is "Val Rovenus Sharing boroughs 2.5(4 - 1.3) 2t3 (7a -..2) `. Moms a de cities 3.2 (4.2 - 1.2) 1.2 (1.3.- .2). Pint Class Cities 2.7 (s - .a) 1.0 (1.4 ,- is) Second Class Cities 2.7 (s - .S) n.a. -- .s.."Y overall 2.3 1s gjita awuuawu�S6aft pans ( -a time meatioaed� Csairal, operation and,adeinistratlen (!4)r Mentioned speoificallyt roads (17), hsaltl�.(3A), grilse (12), lira (0), If* and, rsarwtion (7), public wake..(4),, likes* (4). Lsadfili/rebus collection (4), building xtsieteaaaei (4).'.docieslhwrlor.(3), planaiag (!), watar and •avai (2), scciai services/mengi Maith/drug an4 -mad prafessum" faes/odit/legal (1) rt i. *At asrvftsa .at4/oe wags _ _ 4_ ::- 2: �ogl�no;:piroii biaic services tiithout' the cads{ w tax bass or "tali activity. !. lfsedsa lttr opratiat of the city per .Alaska statues.. •_ _ r41 m �4 li t� Cw YM � .IiMut.OF Y,N AND TM NA 14g o C� a t. w ,1 L . 1! • � 1 AM Survey ReSuite wob"ary, 1986 pap 2 state Rovew SMWing Comasats (Coat.) 4. Library woald bavo to be rem on voluntary b"100 sy Cuts will Man raisin ravemrss and/or cutting i.. S. Tuade wed to suppleaent eaten ad property i services. G. Reductions will am stoics taxes ad/or owttiap servlcee. 7. Will bow to cut or eilmiaste fuaotioas. d. Two wad as Seed money for all city Operational without resew Tondo we Mould not be AM We are today. 9. 0 A !!coats necessary for past projects vould increase. to. our Maicipality would cot be.abla to operate without these fuade including city hell and CcMMIty canter. U. in case of less is ravaaues, r!!1 reduce muSaw and library first, than recreation and eouriSm/eCoaonic d$velopm$at. 12. Has been major source of funding for adalnlStratioa, sanitation. MintenMe and roads. U. City budget !a already " W frills", further cuts will asceseitate a reduction in earvicea. �. 1.4, Basic services. 4, 33. for a Small community to survive In this State, we meet lave acmes fors of city goverement that vodka on a " day-to-daybasis, and that cost$ money. 16, pith sager swat we receive, a 1% drop will kill w b the long no. M�eioloal Maletance lion . General operation and administration (18)s same Ss revenue Sharing (e)y Mtlonad $pecificeliye police (7), fire (4), public worke (4),bealth (4), parka cad recreation (4), road$ (9), capital equipment (2), water and ewer (2), Mating fuel (2), professional Jose (2), library (i), laadflll (1), docke/hsrborS (1), aocial services (1),building meintenaaca (1), and street ligtts (1). commtse 1. Vad to Centel fire inanraaa-1 digilault to but buildings. 2. Operation of the city per Alaska StStuteS. !. Layoff Staff end ""Oil services. 4. lnovesse local property eaxea. S. peoperty.tax inoruse. G. Rsv$ana sbarins sad municipal assistance are the only statewide prograae $bat treat all taxpaySra tt' asset often for apaoisl Interests. -� u 7. Receive ibdde fates mad a Jira floors - (wads for planning and coning, administration, wall how$v atd alcohol :ftd- ft". abura so Naloie souses of progratm* taxes will go up. waloipal "Stan" gas down, property' 9. if mn -- 38. y►artlaliy funded eleatrioal 4istrtbutloa system. - _, . - -- -- --- - - : - - .. : _...:_� _:.. _.. -:-_._:..._ •_.._..., tad♦ Raweaee"9Mrina apsolfla live peilCa (7�, fire (11), �ged raorsaeica Q anSraa operation and sdmiaistraeloa (Uh antioned .srha (s), capital egwlpssat (J), 'libwry (2), eoeiai ss> vicaa (Z); "rosd� . (4), bag*(3). Mai"oitlsofe Program p (1), Cnaeit (i), peofaesioaai fans (1), street1lftCi (), aNl.slrpork'(1), oommants i. tfad for borougU assessors twi eramaeto are emyrt :expensive qua tta bsnsfltas sbould ban been abolleted whey Carw left office. _. ''; �' I g. Ili-oanesaiwd program that ` fadesal heeeOtaap regulations, exceeded .do ♦mail$ Mob"", s. 311e Corr of i tee y, Wlod tot •treat !gb 4. Traditionally, - eelii_ memo 4vitural and tnaicostlon esevleas *!11 +ape beeaRs: - y.. geed to leftea "lucat tafneis radwotioas 6 ." g 'Twndel "M W for 1v station, toedai +Mid police♦ wbieles. .� �, v t �. _ . Q -4. s. _ .. •;�_ •--.-..�_..-._, .: —. —.=:r�Rei.+�+rye:;, 3-. .�• _�._ � . r — 4.� r ;1. at aumy Results tWMWI71966 .: , pigs 2 = �oa_o A of Cs'aM-ftdssn=RolljW Lev (most did not kcal) s 1: Clinic isase thug U& nS/P08i -drug aced. alcohol abuse program. 2. ItA grant cad other grants. • ' ; i. l21X of -%be si Icipality0s major memo source, may be cnt. ; E" 4: tAx..amgr be riducea oy 970,000... Possibly► sus fuada 036o,aao). 6: lot awre but possibly reduce 'or dimiaate the beadstart progras, an school psogran, and owner youth 7. cuts will. reduce roads for capital projects such as airports and water ad "war projects needed for. - Q economic dewlopmsnt. S. IDA gmth EPA grants, ad 8M grants. 9. ?AA allocation to airports senior citiueaprograms such as lunaMs, transportatlon'aad day Dare., IF I �:. pole t tlall1v 'ffaated bi debt limit) e T" .r..Xi 1, juaaau + sllddla school ip 1987 for $W millions eleheentery school in 1989 for 7.5 m1113041 high school in i 1989.for 27.81111an. 2, ItOma « *lgmestary -school to 1"T for $18 miliic. 3. $tft in 1947 for $15.6'miiitopg jr. btgb sebool reconstruction to 1981.for $5.9 millions , 2W GIVITal pro acts ed teattsllM affected b4 debt limit) r is We" - water and sewer coeutrn}etionp electric eompm expansion. 7. Itanai +� comMfnity center is 107 for $2.25 million. • . 3.. fttiato - water and eewer: _ 4: It: set** water and aver to IM for $2 million ($40 .M bond amount). i 6.'Babd ?oiat - sispoa expaasiah'in 1997-" for $14 million. 3� 6. Pallor courthouse to 1986 for $43 saitlton. .... N a' Con"intf dla_Propoaed state Debt Limit t r _ 1. Qohild be,a problen for future projeatef:how eta cam i city satisfy DEC rules4. 2. 8ihoald puC a:limit an borough school bocce a x :. :';•.:` D. So problsr - statei debe 'doilto Is IMS smerdua. Do.i tpulp* other tianfoipalittes because -of high indebtedasse of the North i�lepi Doraujlh. i. ? ' two* Hrit time -fps sneer' and'ssirsr project. Citi inotu$tns. ' } ... - 6., Do not peat problem with 7% limit bat . diMU not include tewaue Bondy good Idea*.. e eat Po tjjlIXMrgCqg IV fine ltefo let t d!d linos r R ;. i/': lsetefill�, aaaar. i.pas'kinj! brldp, �.` ��ae 'K ; Z• $]A°mi7iioa ib aon•goh�hrpmsntsl beads for winter, eaMsr, .tdmvaller and ileatsiolty ,to pt. itatawrlgAt for i� ., � "` ' � •\� ' r" � ' ' • tgfiuftry diviptam. .. _ Ifsur:OWthcm for $4.5 million aril industfrial perk for bs.otlltoa. �,:�.-�:� --��J. - • ., -. " _ -.� •_ �._..f-c��-.i��1'_.__ �_,�.�.���._-. �.u-.i _._ L _-_..-_...._-mac- - = ... - n � _i._ _ �_- - --_L - - --� - • 1 M r e 4.. AM. Survey Results i robin" 1986 Pale 4 ' Insurance Mmieipalities (respondents) that had some iasursaees 26 out of 28 (936)l two sunieipalities have cancelled their Insurance. "Zaotsase from v 86 to inr 86s All Increased (100k)1 the range was from 232 to 39h1 one municipality's prdaium incressed 142% for 1/4th the coverage; anther's increased 36% for 1/9th the coverage; xasureace as a percent of fY 86 operating budgets Average 7.2% (the range was 18.9% - .50 RAftipslities portieipatiaS in the AM Inowrdnee Progreso 10 out of 28 (36%) M nicipalities interested in pooling. 24 out of 28 (66%) Msnicipalitles which have reduced services due To premius iaoressees 4 out of 28 (14%) 14rinan�jo (Title 29 chaps limited the ability of esaaicipalities to exercise eminent doaain powers outside !Asir boundaries) Mmicipslities which provide services outside their muuioipal bouadariess 9 out of 28 (32%) Plsaaod to expand services outoidso 4 out of 28 (14%) an limit as a problems 7 out of 28 (25%) Have over used sminent domains 3 out of 28 (11%) = MB to the following municipalities that completed and returned the surveys Kodlsk low" gova"01, Mosul Sitkas Uioes Borough, Fairbanks, Kenai, Kodiak, Polar, Qalens, Nome, Pelicans St. Mm'sp Ssnd pgiat, Skagsays Soldotma, ifasille, Unalasks, Ald muk, Alekaagik, Bethel, Eyler Houston, Kotsebus, !k(irath, Hateaut. Violate. Tinskse Soriano. and Wales. -- 71 1 ." .. ... pe 9_---/��-.•,, _ .. "'.':` _ .T , _-_.��.K '.. /- —!.'.. .-:flu ..__,.f �; _ 4 _ •-_ _ it .... � `�' }j' .... i p �`� +_...nr - I�._..._.......r-__.._�....... .... n_._ -wv- n-_..ter...+.—.......... _._�._._._._. _._�—.-._._.—.r.. . _...._..._ ... �.. i """ _ -} II °' - __.-_ - ___._..__.__.�_�_..__ _...._._ , ' ^• _' w, .'u� it 1' ��' , ;.;� t , , IT