HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-22 Council Packet - Work Session, Comp PlanKenai City Council
Work Session
May 22, 1993
Comprehensive Plan
KENAI COMP PLAN REVIEW
Comment Sheet
I. Introduction
A. Purpose and Organization
B. Highlights of the Plan
II. Employment and Population Forecasts
A. History of the Community
B. Economic Trends
C. Population Projections
D. Administrative Economic Development Strategies
III. Land Use Plan
A. Land Use Plan
B. Existing Land Use
C. Residential Land Use
D. Residential Land Use Strategies
E. Commercial Land Use
F. Commercial Land Use Strategies
G. Industrial Land Use
H. Industrial Land Use Strategies
IV. Transportation Plan
A. Surface Transportation
B. Air Transportation
C. Marine Transportation
V. Public Facilities and Services
A. Airport
B. Animal Control
C. Fire
D. Health Care
E. Library
F. Parks and Recreation
G. Police
H. Senior Service
I. Utilities
VI. Social, Cultural, and Educational Facilities
VII. Implementation
VIII. Administrative Procedures
IX. Planning and Zoning Procedures
RESOLUTION 91-12-03
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
OUNA.LASHKA CORPORATION
A Resolution of the Ounalashka Corporation , a village
Corporation located at Unalaska, urges the North Pacific Fisheries
Management Council and all other authorities to rescind its vote to
implement the IFQ Program approving the Individual Transferable Quota
Share Program for the Sable fish and Halibut Fisheries until an economic
impact analysis of the program on the City of Unalaska and other
communities of Alaska is completed and shared with the affected
communities for their consideration and comment.
Whereas, a number of traditional management proposals have
been submitted to the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council which
would potentially eliminate the problems that an Individual Fishery
Quota (IFQ) would address; and
Whereas, the Council's role and responsibility is to analyze
all proposals on a given issue before implementing major changes to a
fishery; and
whereas, analysis and implementation of traditional management
proposals to address the problems have not even been reviewed prior to
the proposed implementation of an IFQ System; and
Whereas, an IFQ System is going to take years to implement
while the fisheries need extensive traditional management changes, not
short --term improved management; and
whereas, the ability to participate in multiple fisheries and
adapt to changing economic and resource conditions are vital
characteristics of the Alaska fishing industry; and
Whereas, IFQ systems under consideration provide much of the
resource to be allocated to non-resident users, excluding
disproportionate numbers of Alaska fishermen, of which over 100 abide in
Unalaska, and preclude participation by the growing Alaska longline
fishing fleet; and
Whereas, IFQ Systems will deny the opportunity for residents
of the Municipality of Unalaska and other Alaskan communities to fully
diversify and maximize their fisheries creating financial, hardships and
creating economic impacts; and
Whereas, IFQ Systems could accommodate offshore processors
which will minimize the raw fish tax to Alaskan communities and the
State.