Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-01 Council Packet - Work Session, ManagerKenai City Council Work Session April 1, 1993 Reviewing City Manager Applicants KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 1. 1993 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:45 p.m. COUNCIL PRESENT: The work session began at approximately 7:55 p.m. Councilmembers present were Williams, Bookey, Swarner, Measles, Smalley, and Monfor (arrived at 7:57 p.m.). Absent was McComsey. Staff present were Freas, Howard, Graves, and Kornelis. DISCUSSION: Council began by reviewing the remaining finalists of the 15 chosen from the previous work session. Council began with Manninen. No. 25 - Manninen Experience = 5 pts. Degrees = 5 points (two degrees) Related fields = scores 3,4,3,3,3,4 (has been involved with public works, economic development, investment analysis, grantsmanship, etc.) Knowledge of AK = 0 Legislative = lobbying experience = 4,34,3,3,3,4 = 3.5 Community Interests - 0 (nothing stated on resume) Ec. Development = 4,3,3,3 (Swarner stated she gave the applicant a four because of the boardwalk project he discussed in his resume, airport, wastewater industrial park, etc.) Total Score: 20 points. No. 29 - Pefferman - Experience = total of 16 years - 5 pts. Degrees = 5 pts. Related fields = 2,0,2,2,2 (not much there, got some money for a boat harbor, worked with EDA for a jail facility, community gym) 2 pts. Knowledge of AK = (There was some discussion of how to score, Smalley stated that the scoring needs to be the same as everyone else. Measles stated that knowledge of Alaska cannot be compared with experience. This criterium needs to be taken out for the next round.) = 5 pts. Legislative Experience = Swarner stated she gave a zero as there was nothing listed in the resume. Williams stated that if the applicant has been involved in a Four -Dam Pool Funding Committee, REA's and municipalities, he has legislative experience. Swarner stated that as before, if it is not in the resume, it cannot be scored. Swarner stated that they all know people who are members of boards, etc., but are not active. Williams agreed there was not much stated in the resume as far as WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 5, 1993 PAGE 2 legislative experience. Williams suggested a zero be the score. Smalley objected and suggested scoring two. Scores = 2,2,2,2,2. Score = 2 pts. Community Interests: Score = 0 pts. Ec. Development = 3,2,313,3 = 3 pts. Total Score = 22 pts. No. 36 - Rudd Experience = 5 pts. Degrees = 2 pts. Related fields = 5,3,4,3,3,3. Swarner stated the applicant has airport experience in both large and small towns. Also public works experience. Williams stated the applicant has negotiating experience. Swarner added experience with contamination and grantwriting. Score = 3.5 pts. Knowledge of AK = 0 pts. Legislative Experience = 3,2,3,3 (Experience as legislative aide, state legislative process.) Score = 2.5 pts. Community Interests = 4,5,4,5,4 (Involvement in JC's, kennel club, Blue Earth Club) Score = 4.5 pts. Ec. Development = 4,4,3,3,4 (lots of experience, i.e. established an Economic Development Commission). Score = 3.5 pts. Total Score = 21 No. 38 - Schaefermeyer Experience = 3.5 years as city manager. Swarner stated she scored the applicant with a zero because he was a deputy city manager, interim and assistant city manager. Seven years was the minimum needed and the applicant does not meet that. Comment added that the applicant had seven years of municipal experience, but not as a city manager. Score = 0 pts. Degrees = 2 pts. (B.S. in political science). Measles stated that Council needs to be consistent and score as others have been. The score should be zero. Williams stated he has a B.S. in Political Science. Swarner stated he should be given a two. Score = 2 pts. Related Fields = Staff experience with Ted Stevens, Alaska Loggers Association as lobbyist (decided that would be legislative experience). 2,2,2,2,3 = Score = 2 pts. Knowledge of AK = 5 pts. Legislative Experience = 2,2,2,2 (Stevens aide and lobbyist for loggers) Score = 2 pts, WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 5, 1993 PAGE 3 Community Interests = Boy Scouts, Rotary, Borough Assembly...3,3,3,3 - Score = 3 pts. Ec. Development = 3,2,2,... Score = 2 pts. Total -Score = 16 points. No. 48 - Weitzel Experience = 5 pts. (Measles stated to not count his time as county commissioner in 1981, however his score would still be 5.) Score = 5 Degrees = B.A., M.P.A. Score = 5 pts. Related Fields = (Public Safety Director, chief industrial recruiter, negotiating experience with labor unions, director of health department) Score = 4 pts. Knowledge of AK = 0 pts. Leg. Experience = Applicant was an elected official. 1,1, 2 ,1. (Administrative official on the budget, chief industrial recruiter) Score = 1 pts. Community Interests = (A lot of interest mostly through work promoting the community, created first economic development group.) 2,2,2,... Score = 2 pts. Ec. Development = 3,3,3,3,3 Score = 3 pts. Total Score = 20 pts. No. 50 - Widom Experience = Nine years - Score = 2 pts. Degrees = 5 pts. (M.S. in Public Administration) Related Fields = 212,21212 (BIA grant specialist, public relations) Score = 2 pts. Knowledge of AK = 5 pts. Legislative Experience = Smalley stated he looked hard, but came up with zero. Williams stated he had several people in Juneau say to look at him. 1,2,1,2,2. Score = 1.5 pts. Community Interests = 3,3,3,3,3,3 Score = 3 pts. Ec. Development = 1,1,1,1 (worked to increase sales tax collection, visitors information center, dry cleaning) Score = 1 pts. Total Score = 19.5 pts. No. 53 - Zenor - Experience = 10 years. 3,3,3,... Score = 3 pts. Degrees = B.S. and working on MA and pre -law courses. 3,3,3,... Score = 3 pts. WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 5, 1993 PAGE 4 Related Fields = 4,4,4,4,4 (public works, management, house rehabilitation, visitors and convention committee, universal garbage) Score = 4 pts. Knowledge of AK = 0 pts. Legislative Experience = 2,2,2,3... Score = 2.5 pts. (Smalley stated he was looking at his accomplishments in other cities. Williams remarked he was a public information officer, community relations, was an assistant, sizes of towns are comparable. Monfor stated she could not find anything of what he did.) Score = 2.5 pts. Community Interests = (International Resort Cities, American Water Works, stated in resume he was involved in non -city related activities, Chamber of Commerce, downtown merchants) 4,3,3,3...Score = 3 pts. Ec. Development = 5,5,5,5,5 (growth management...Smalley stated that the applicant has been involved with resurrecting lots of dying towns.) Score = 5 pts. Total Score = 20.5 pts. NEXT STEP: Williams suggested taking only the dropping everyone under 20 points. 20 points. Those kept were: Henry Graper (24.9 pts.) Thomas Manninen (20 pts.) Ed Pefferman (22 pts.) John Rudd (21 pts.) David Weitzel (20 pts.) Douglas Zenor (20.5 pts.) Williams asked if there were any to include in the list. Answer suggested that they first find o Williams asked if council wanted have Administration contact these still interested and available. top five. Measles suggested Decision - drop those under other applicants council wanted Not at this time. Bookey t if these six are available. to continue to review tonight or six to find out if they are Monf or stated she could like to find out if these six are available and ask teem if they have any additional information they would like to send for council review. Swarner suggested they set the criteria for the next level of review. Williams stated they will be getting into personal evaluations soon, but first, see if they are available; second, council needs WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 5, 1993 PAGE 5 to do a "down and dirty" background check. Williams suggested they call the local newspapers to find out if any of the applicants are under indictment or if there are outstanding complaints: Graves stated a release form should be sent to the applicants. Graves stated he would draft a form giving the applicant's permission for the city to investigate their backgrounds. Monfor suggested the applicants be contacted and ask them: 1. If they are available 2. If there is additional information they would like to add to their resumes. 3. If they have objections to a background check, have them send or FAX a letter or waiver. Graves stated either have them do a letter or send them a waiver and they may FAX a copy, but mail the original. Williams stated that upon receiving the waiver, they can ask the Chief of Police to run a BI, checking on the national crime computer. Williams continued, they then could call the newspaper in the individual towns and get their "low down." Graves stated the applicant should be made aware that we will be calling the newspapers. Measles added they should be told the background check will be through newspapers, police, etc. Measles stated that none of these applicants made comments about confidentiality. Williams suggested after finding if the applicants are still interested, letters be sent to all the other applicants not making the cut. Smalley suggested if one is not interested, they take the next highest number from the last cut. Measles stated he would not care if the finalists were cut to four. Williams agreed. Williams added after they review again they then can decide to spend money and flying them here. Smalley stated they had not discussed flying spouses here as well. Williams stated if they get down to five applicants, they should be called first and council should speak with the applicant over the phone. Monfor stated she wants phone interviews. Williams directed Howard, after the finalists are notified, to call AML and ask if they have a city profile for those cities Pefferman and Graper work. Also ask if they have done any specific work on behalf of AML. Williams also suggested they WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 51 1993 PAGE 6 call other councilmembers, etco with which they have worked. Swarner stated there was no one at the last AML legislative committee meeting from Bristol Bay. NEXT WORK SESSIONICRITERIA: Williams suggested the next work session be set and the criteria for the review as well. Criteria: The most important criteria = EXPERIENCE. Smalley asked if the experience should be only as a city manager or include other municipal -type experience. Monfor stated should include other municipal -type experience as Kenai has so many different departments (senior center, airport, library, parks and recreation, etc.) Williams suggested they look for a city manager for a full -service city. 1. EXPERIENCE - Overall experience, including related work. Measles stated a sliding scale needs to be used as one person may be a city manager for one year and an assistant for ten and someone else may have the experience the other way. Suggestion was made point for assistant, one point for city manager, point for other related work. Decision = k point for other municipal experience, one point per year for manager. Monfor asked when they will be using this criteria. Williams stated they will be looking at the resumes again and score again. Monfor stated they needed to find out if they have legislative experience, community interests, etc. if it is not in their resumes. Measles stated there was no point to define the criteria until they find out if the applicants are still interested or available. Measles stated that no matter how many they decide as the ones to interview (4 to 6, 3 to 2), they need to decide if they want all of them to come for an interview. They cannot go further without this information. Monfor agreed. Bookey suggested the applicant needs to be asked if they want to add information to their resume. Monfor stated Kim should ask them if they have more information to add. Howard asked if council wanted her to send the "no thank you" letters. Howard was directed to send letters to all but the 16 WORK SESSION NOTES APRIL 51 1993 PAGE 7 applicants left on the last list. Graves asked what council wanted Administration to tell any of the 16 who might call. Administration was directed to say that it was a preliminary cut, but it is not final. NEXT WORK SESSION - Set for April 12, 1993, 6:00 p.m. in council chambers. Kornelis stated that council may need a special meeting in regard to the courthouse project. Graves stated that if an agreement comes from the State on the 12th, Administration will need time to review it and send it back with any changes, etc. If additional information has been received, council will discuss the city manager evaluation. If more time is needed in which to receive additional information, they will discuss the budget. The work session ended at 9:50 p.m. Notes transcribed by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk (4/5/93) Ci> a. An m N-. v . .. M '> m m q Id m q � 0 4J F e m N go 3c tn 3 0 E♦ a 04 W p a N N a N M Op M CO In Q M in WORK SESSION NOTICE The Kenai City Council will convene in a work session on Thursday, April 1, 1993 at 7:45 p.m, in the Kenai City Council Chambers. The topic to be discussed at that time is: City Administrator/Resume Evaluation The public is invited to attend and participate. Carol L. Freas City Clerk DATED: March 30, 1993