Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-06 Council PacketKenai City Council Meeting Packet November 6, 1996 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1996 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www.Kenai.not/city BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING - Appeal of Delmar Sanders A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda are considered *All items listed with an asterisk (* ) to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) 1. Ginger Steffy/Kathy Scott - Trip Report/1996 ASTC Conference, "Touching Minds and Changing Futures" C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance No. 1723-96 - Approving and Adopting the Revised Comprehensive Plan for the City of Kenai and Recommending Adoption by the Kenai Peninsula Borough. 2. Ordinance No. 1724-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $24,000 in the General Fund for Lobbyist Services. 3. Resolution No. 96-84 - Transferring $10,000 in the Kenai ARFF Capital Project Fund for Travel. 4. *1996-97 Liquor License Application - Old Town Village Restaurant. D. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission -1- 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks & Recreation Commission 6. Planning & Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board C. Challenger Steering Committee d. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board E. MINUTES 1. *Regular Meeting of October 16, 1996. 2. *Work Session of October 14, 1996. F. CORRESPONDENCE G. OLD BIISINESS H. NEW BIISINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 3. *Ordinance No. 1725-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and appropriations by $3,750 in the General Fund for the Purchase of Banners. 4. *Ordinance No. 1726-96 - Amending the Kenai Municipal Code 14.20.220 to Establish Signage Requirements Within the Townsite Historic District Zone. 5. *Ordinance No. 1727-96 - Amending the Kenai Municipal Code 14.20.105(k) to Conform with Kenai's Sign Code. 6. *Ordinance No. 1728-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $3,228 in the Airport Land System Special Revenue Fund to Purchase a New Computer. 7. Approval - Application for Lease - Lots 13 & 14, Block 1, Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park/Tony Blomfield, d/b/a The Blomfield Company. 8. Approval - Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Between City of Kenai and K. Scott & Associates, Inc./Alaska Challenger Learning Center Study. -2- MAYOR'S REPORT OCTOBER 16, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING REQUESTED CHANGES TO THE AGENDA BY: TO CLARIFY: B-1, Persons Scheduled to be Heard - Kathy Scott/ Presentation of Public Health Nurse Study. B-2, Persons Scheduled to be Heard - Kathy Scott/ Ginger Steffy - Trip Report. CLERK ADD TO: H-2, Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 - Alaska Pump & Supply, Inc./$2,697.03 PUBLIC WORKS ADD TO: I-4, Application of Tom Ackerly/Personnel Arbitration Board CLERK CONSENT AGENDA MAYOR'S REPORT COUNCIL MEETING OF // A �J PAGE � OF 4�-M S V BANNOCK SMALLEY 12 WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES J�l M S V BAD&OCK SMALLEY WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES G 17,2 _ 9� M S V BANNOCK SMALLEY �- WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES M S V BANNOCK SMALLEY WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES M S V BANNOCCK G SMALLEY U WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES M S V BANNOCK SMALLEY WILLIAMS BOOKEY SWARNER MOORE MEASLES Imagine this: It is the year 20 and in The Challenger Learning Center at around the Sun between Earth and Ma Wheeling Jesuit College was made Space Station on which you serve moves possible by Congressman Alan B. its long awaited target. Halley's Comet has not Mollohan of West Virginia's First passed through our solar system in 76 years and Congressional District. It was will not return for a very long time. Many years Congressman Mollohan who urged of tannin and hard work have been invested in - - _ college officials to seek designation as planning an official Challenger Learning Center site. this one moment. This is A member of the U.S. House of Representatives a chance of a lifetime. ' - Appropriations Committee and a Chairman of one of Challenger Learning its important subcommittees (Commerce, State, Center participants are - Justice and Judiciary), Mollohan has been a strong Mission Specialists supporter of initiatives to improve ways of teaching } stetted to serve on one . and learning math, science, and technology. His �``• of threight critical teams ''"\ interest and support was key in making the Wheelie necessaryr the success �' Jesuit College Center for Educational Technologies • of the mis rom possible. The Challenger Learning Center is a part of `- ' e NASA Classroom of the Future Project and is the Operation pf aI the Space Station t Moused in the new Center for Educational rows of'tvWitors at R — ;Technologies. Mission Co eamWo�. F ntial. The = Congressman Mollohan's support of Challenger Navigation located h 1. while the — arning Centers nationwide and'of the Wheeling ". Probe Team is quidVWsembling it facility has drawn significant piu*e. 1p, honor the probe for launch es in ti►W4, evelbornent of ` r comet location and ent Wh-elling specifications to thi troll Meanwhile, Mission'' so gli `i peculiar fluctuations in the and sends an urgent message to the Life • • SCHOOL PROGRAMS ' Support team to investigate. The comet is approaching. You have just two hours to - ' • maneuver the Space ' Station into a rendezvous with the comet's tail and launch a scientific probe. You can not afford to miss r because it will be a long ram' time before Halley's FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO Comet returns... SCHEDULE A MISSION, PLEASE CALL: JUNE TIRPAK, ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR EBOL-4 • P-L4:a • L4EBlaS TF- CHAL ..WNGER LEARNING t AT WHOE1_ING JESUIT COL_L The Challenger raining Center at Feeling Jesuit, sllo is pant of a rowing network of centers nationwide that have been established by the Challenger Center for Space Science Eduon in memory :ha#onger Space oitu"116. Born out of tragedy and na •� o W x z .� " zN xz x with the purpose of =_ - continuing the mission of the crew, the Challenger Learning Center is a =.. very unique hands. on learning experience designed to faster interest >. in math, science and technology IV education. The facility is a mathematics, laboratory for science, and spirited teachers and technology problems an exciting learning during a space flight environment for simulation. The their students. program's goal is to VAth state -of the -art reach middle school resources and students before they innovative decide -as many curriculum, the students Challenger Learning do- that math and Center launches science is not teachers and for them. students on a voyage of The Learning Center 'discovery. is comprised of two Students and parts: a "Space educators Station" that gives wank in teams students a simulated and solve ;experience of real -life working in space 9. Approval - Petition to Vacate the Entire of Sockeye Circle Public Right -of -Way and Associated Utility Easement as Dedicated and/or Granted by Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part One (Plat 95-32 KRD); Section 7, T5N, R10W, Seward Meridian, AK. 10.. Discussion - Capital Improvement List. EXECUTIVE SESSION - None scheduled. I. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City Manager 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Director 7. Airport Manager J. DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council K. ADJOURNMENT -3- K. Scott & Associates, Inc. Grantsmanship, Project Management, Marketing November 1, 1996 Mayor John Williams & Kenai City Council 210 Fidalgo Street, Suite 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mayor Williams & Council Members: The Kenai Public Health Center study issue is a multi -faceted one involving the historical relationship between the city and public health; a complicated land deal in the 1960s; and reviewing possibilities for relocating the facility to existing and proposed sites for relocation. Clearly continued occupation of the limited space in city hall by Kenai Public Health Center is no longer possible. The space is grossly inadequate for the programs and volumes of clients served. Division of Public Health looks to communities for support and interest when they choose locations. Responsibility for overcrowding at the Kenai Center has been volleyed between the state and city for some time. The conclusion of this report is that the city did not assure it would provide for an unlimited amount of space for public health. The program's growth is cause for development of a new partnership understanding. Providing land and construction oversight for a new facility, as in the method used to acquire the new courthouse, appears to be the city's best offering for such a partnership, assuring the continued location of the center in Kenai. I will be at the council meeting of November 6th to briefly present the findings and respond to your questions. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this interesting project. Sincerely, Kathleen F. Scott P. O. Box 2488, Kenai, Alaska 99611 Telephone (907) 283-5130/Fax (907) 283-5918 E-Mail: kscott@?alaska.net Suggested by: Planning and Zoning CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1723-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REVISED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF KENAI AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION BY THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH. WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough as a second class borough shall provide for planning on an area wide basis in accordance with AS 29.40; and, WHEREAS, the City of Kenai, as a home -rule city situated within a second class borough, has reviewed their Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, Planning Staff and the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission held numerous public meetings and received numerous comments regarding the revision of the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a formal public hearing on the Plan on March 13, 1996 and provided recommendations to the Kenai City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council on September 16, 1996, in a joint work session with the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the draft Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council on November 6, 1996, reviewed the final draft of the Kenai Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval of the Plan to the Kenai Peninsula Borough. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Kenai that: Section 1 - The Final Draft of the Kenai Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City of Kenai is hereby approved and adopted as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kenai. Section 2 - This Plan is hereby recommended to the Kenai Peninsula Borough for adoption as the official Borough Comprehensive Plan within the City of Kenai planning area of the Borough. City of Kenai Ordinance No. 1723-96 Page 1 of 2 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, this sixth day of November, 1996. ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk John J. Williams, Mayor Introduced: Adopted: Effective Date: October 16, 1996 November 6, 1996 November 6, 1996 City of Kenai Ordinance No. 1723-96 Page 2 of 2 C-� Suggested by: Administrati___ City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1724-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $24,000 IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR LOBBYIST SERVICES. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to contract for lobbyist services; and WHEREAS, a lobbyist was not budgeted in the FY97 Legislative Department budget; and WHEREAS, money is available for appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BE INCREASED AS FOLLOWS: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriated Fund Balance $24,000 Increase Appropriations: Legislative - Prof. Services $24,000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 6th day of November, 1996. JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduction: 10/16/96 Adopted: 11/6/96 Effective: 11/6/96 Approved by Finance: (10/9/96) sj Suggested by: Airport Manager City of Kenai RESOLUTION NO. 96-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA TRANSFERRING $10,000 IN THE KENAI ARFF CAPITAL PROJECT FUND FOR TRAVEL. WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to send City of Kenai representatives to tour the firefighting facility in Helena, Montana since it is similar to the proposed facility in Kenai; and WHEREAS, the City representatives will also travel to Modesto, California to visit a firefighting facility operated by the university as will be the Kenai facility; and WHEREAS, money is available for transfer in Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following budget transfers be made: Kenai ARFF Capital Proiect From: Engineering $10,000 To: Administration $10,000 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 6th day of November, 1996. JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance:' Sao of AkWM 66o W. 7eh. Avenue. Sub 360 Andy--^e. Alaska 9MI (v17 a3s Thb eppmostlen is loss: (ahedt one) CONTINUOUS PRINTING OF ALASKA (907) 277-0446 ;Ll.: CT 2 210 LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICA CIY CL1oFz(Please read separate /nstruct/one. T aid7%*w erMaser'. "no S tar yaw ems., ❑ Two Year ❑ Seasonal - Dallas of operation not to exceed 12 race. SECTION A. V EN E INFORMATION. Muet baCO'r 46Wfor am"of Type of Application: Lbwns TV@ Bubaa Rawence B ea o4.11 Gb �— Fa Lk:aw Y /`-� Federal EW License Fee $ mew �j�iftl�Pf1N f Fllllnp Fee: _ OR El Outs- MXftlP8&Y �A��rv9 I iourk"Oft (spew, n ❑ Rorwal Carver U,. Lb~ NLwftw 0 renewal, has dw license been exercised or active at least 30 Nghtaiour Penatty (If ❑ Transfer d daya durip each of the two pnc.dirp calandar years] (AS D4.11.330(3)) applicable) $ ucetw. Kotler 11 % a4Ptoslb^ d bs delved unless—100 request for ❑ YES operation le improved by Ile AtmhWc lint wage Total ❑ NOass IdBor S Enter applcar's «Mruetaree'e rrI- and rrWAN DOW8maaress Ae ( 1/atw) / Carraranh Courltl Name and Maanp Addwss addres ss R.twuld eppesr on urea aeon•:,L i ..�7 Also lr.mw:tlona) ' Street Address « of Business �, f 111CN�RA �•_ti f}dElCRY //�/� 01- ,5C !li/a , �9 � \ 9 /� / / BiiMu.. Phon.�► kiirtbsr(a/) ❑ TNt8IS A NEW I� 0MG ADDRESS O - SECTION B. PREMISES TO BE LICENSED. Muet for New and Ramon p,,ttoo Da on p /� advertlterp ao r le leratlon of pronYes greeter than or less own 60 mks trom the botsrdarM Ole / %,7cv u blic / i CS %!%1/,Pr 1l T "a"'�'M►' (Y1Corponslad dy, baag- orurr ad munklpewy►7 School nmsrured wore i � AB o4.11.41 o OR ❑ memo own so mess ❑ Lass eon 6o Nit Apprbable Ordinance Prep hm to be licensed r: 0❑1 Plain wemnee b Fire bwrafrl (Required for new and aoPI bull") 0 Exlelaug FeclRy ❑ Now Bull" ❑ proposed Bum" DiPrn of Promises Ao.dwd (R.gWrsd wr ON New, and RelouOon eppit>i«n) SECTION C. RENEWAL INFORMATION. Must be ronTwad'or Rerwww apWtcabms. Mn m Ansed Promises wlno alcoholic beverages r ved. mmumed. « alored bean from the last diagram Km the atalerhaM d ' merest changed from ems lest ataklrrwrr attbnratad7 PACKAGE le On a renewal of eve annual maw, requited under 1 D4.646 to eel atomic beverages inresponse to 7 ❑ YFS 11NO ❑ YES ❑ No ❑ YES ❑ NO SECTION D. TRANSFER INFORMATION. Mtwt be mmmed f« Tmwr d Ltowws "Owe and Rdsorlon eppllorbm only - Mammals) 00 MWV Address of Currom Uwasse(s) ❑ III lied Transfer. Arty alrnanait executed urd« AS O4-11.670 for Pwpoees Of apphyaq AS 04.11.360(4)(6) In a MW nvolun0 q'ImWer. 11mtret be led wlh V* .pplra0on (15 AAC 104.107} Real or parsarmal propadyaxrw�pyad w1m erabvirhrb: (AIYch extra sheet R necessary) BEFORE TRANSFER txkp 8sseuaes As: (Buelrrees one) BEFORE TRANSFER, Strest Address 0, Loombon eOgpOgATI MA N. Wash be completed a applicant or txrappacarrt is a rxhporabon. (AS 04.11.3ao) cowors m Name Doing Business As (Business Nona) Sbeet Address or Lar'a- of Buanaee — --- Date of kworp«Mbn In Alaska Malkmp Adtress CRY. Bus. ZIP Coda city tad Bess. corpomr ogle. Phew tea le are above rra . ompaalbn In good with ore Stele of Monks. DapeMnnt of Conwnwm and EconallNveloparwrr7 ❑ YES ❑ NO �� Raglstered Agad 06m w ad l - 11 Address) Agony* Alrha Reetdsnry Years: aawaw: _ AgwWs Plm No. COIVORATM DMOTORD AM aiOCKHOLDOIa (Use addabrW shoes of necoN» x «Shares of OaaraSWP AN Naha (Do wo was nlYe) hares Ad6ass Deli ON f 1h ors a oc a ACMC a 1LC Aaaa V rna a+na.ra 11, a~ Deb APPa'ed Dealeoft spews" \ U U J 4 CONTINUOUS PRINTING OF ALAWA (907) 277-0446 ALASKA LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 2 SECTION F. INDIVIDUAL/CORPORATE OFFICER M FORMATK*L The wboi rramrmn n„wta I, men w sot , gyp- or m,1 M. N &M ophsr or co-rppMaN Y a mFgrrbn. On afters asssd mwt bicbrde tin President. VbAemiden. aawery and Trwsreor. Use additional Pow w neoeasay. W. ,Dp n«u.. MN�sIR V C ZA-/Z -- l�rJll / ftirl Nwrqjjb not uuseWftbi 7"+/,),o P-f, Jeh 'l /o Adbwall• pp MlsS1oN A Ave-V 1 — P� l41f »,�:j %ItiE rxly, fMale cow A -K ?160 /1 ahh /loins Address (/ Aserar tiom rnaarq adarwy Nona Ad*on (11 alarm Inns moftV oddnoo) °rid 3 � 7 9� -1 , Lrglh a AYska naaprioy Yeae� MaM1ne MappMoarrla•oonpwatbr4 drdytlretxnrpateoeloeym lteki LonpotAboilteRookluncy IarM lsecaporatbn,Monlityllietrprass o6beyou hold. Yar!� I 'didnth" Full Nate (Do not uw MWMs) lCljAgo (��� STICfr,Jn,, f Harms (Do not use kWMs) — l4-11�lg0A� Po CRY, bode CRY, So". Honie ,,a din nnrkq.do.w) d i i ��J'-ocO �� Nora. (a All m.aMip afdreea) .� e u'!0� TT ,,U aoQ Date of we Hon» Phone work Phene Dale 7 Homo PAWN wodt Plot LWM of Alaska Yarn RoMdray Iapparar fesewnpontbn, lderalylheeorpaaleotfloa yde inlet I1 Latptitt Mike M opkara rn.'ooip�o3r.non, lo.,,uya,oco,Porab o(Iloayo„ hold. Y � DD048 wry 611CMWetn l w corpora" oow farad above nor w nave ry cb or kofact Ynereet inany other abolnolle naveroo bushow Meerned In Alrke or aly ether oils? qNO ❑ YEs I yes, ptw stare. nenne or buoinwa. and sadr.w. I never having ff or sinceW Of fldrq of pr last ee in aniat, has any rld"'t" a corporals p6¢w Mated above been convicted of a bony, a violation of AS 04. or bean convicted, w a Mwrwee a nwtapr of Marred fxemlaw arnollw state co tire Mquor laws of OW shM? 1P PIO YES It yW pro on sepaar alnet t poa. H. DECLARATION, cow be rend and crated by eadr appaoat I declare under penalty of perjury that I have examined this application, including the accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete, and this application is not in violation of any security interest or other contracted obligations. I further certify that I have read and am familiar with Title 4 of the Alaska statutes and its regulations, and that in accordance with AS 04.11.450, no person other than the applicant(s) or licensee(s) has any direct or indirect financial interest in the licensed business. i agree to provide all Information required by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in support of this application. H application Is for a Beverage Dlspwmwy or Package Store Iloarrse, I cartlfy that each applicant named on this application has resided In the state of Alaska for at Nast one year prior to the date of this application; and/or the applicant Is a corporation registered and qualified to do buskwas In fhe state of Alaska for one year prior to the date of lids apptlt abon, or d of the shareholders have resided In the state of Alaska for at least one year prior to the date of this application. SIG S OF L (APPLICANT)SKiNA S OF TRANSFER S 'VL Brb.rb.d ad avian b tnebre m. nY a lAof atboo bed ad.wont to btwe me day of 19 dot 19 NOTARY PUVM FOR MASM NOTARY PllaL10 N AND FOR AIABKA rMcoo 1hMenon* — 29 -5 ram t+rvul reps z tnw eve) MEMORANDUM U' f TO: Cary R. Graves, City Attorney 10 gj FROM: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk City of Kenai DATE: October 23, 1996 RE: SANDRA VOZAR/LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION Yesterday (at about 4:30 p.m.) Sandra Vozar came into City Hall and talked to me about her application for a liquor license for her new restaurant, "Old Town Village Restaurant." She asked me if it could be placed on the next agenda for council approval. I told her I had not received a copy of the application and notification from the ABC Board as yet and normally I don't place the applications on the agenda until I receive the information from ABC. She told me that the person she spoke with at ABC told her it was not necessary to wait for notification from them and that she was trying to get the city's approval early in order that she might get her license prior to the end of the year (probably in order to hold holiday parties, etc.). I told her I would speak with ABC about the matter today. Today I spoke with Donna Johnson at ABC about the Vozar application. I told her what Sandra had told me. Ms. Johnson told me they had not received the application yet from Vozar and that it was the city's prerogative whether we would process the application prior to having it forwarded to us by ABC. If, when they do their investigation and background check, a reason is found to deny the application, they would deny it even if the city had approved it prior to their investigation. I reviewed KMC Chapter 2.40 and it does not require ABC forward the application prior to our processing it. I called the Borough and spoke with Gina who handles the liquor licenses (checks for taxes owing, etc.). I asked her if the Borough had any requirements as to when they processed liquor applications. She told me she wasn't aware of any. However, since this establishment is in the city, she could advise me of Vozar's tax information outside of her code requirements. I know of nothing written that requires the ABC forwarding of the application prior to processing it. However, as long as I have been doing this job, applications have been received from ABC prior to our processing them. Remembering that if we process the application prior to ABC forwarding it to me, it would be without ABC's investigative review, do you have any concerns or objections to including Vozar's application on the next agenda? NOU-01-1996 09:34 FROM KPB FINANCE TO C/KENAI P.01 KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH 144 N. BINKLEY - SOLDOTNA, ALASKA • 99669-7599 BUSINESS (907) 262-4441 FAX (907)262-1892 November 1, 1996 City of Kenai Attn: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk 210 Fidalgo Ave., Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611-7794 RE: New Liquor License Application MIKE NAVARRE MAYOR RECEIVED NOV 11996 KENAI CITY CLERK OLD TOWN VILLAGE RESTAURANT - Restaurant/Eating Place Paul M. Vozar, Sandra J. Vozar, Richard W. Strawn & Sharon L. Strawn 1000 Mission Ave., Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Carol: Please be advised that the Kenai Peninsula Borough Finance Department has no objection to the above new application for a Restaurant/Eating Place liquor license based on unpaid taxes. All tax accounts registered to the business and/or applicants are current at this time. Non -objection of renewal based on tax delinquency does not remove any other grounds for protest the Borough might assert. Please forward us a copy of your City Council approval/objection letter for our records. Thank you for your cooperation in these matters. Sinc rely, Gina Derleth Delinquent Accounts TOTAL P.01 KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION AGENDA October 7, 1996 Kenai City Hall 7:00 p.m. Chairman Will Jahrig 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - September 9, 1996 4. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Kenai Dunes Restoration Project - Resolution of Award 96-78 b. Additional Floats 6. NEW BUSINESS a. November Meeting Date b. Discussion - Kenai River Habitat Restoration & Restoration Enhancement Project 7. INFORMATION a. Kenai Dock - Bent Piling 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS a. City Council Agendas 9. ADJOURNMENT Harbor Commission ***Minutes*** October 7, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers Chairman Will Jahrig 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Members Present: Will Jahrig, Tom Thompson, George Spracher, Ray McCubbins, Jeannie Munn Members Absent: Barry Eldridge, Mike McCune Also Present: Keith Kornelis, Jim Bookey, Debby Fahnholz 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Thompson MOVED to approve the agenda as presented. Commissioner McCubbins SECONDED the motion. The agenda was approved as presented. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner McCubbins MOVED to accept the agenda as written. Commissioner Thompson SECONDED the motion. The minutes were approved as written. 4. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None. 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Kenai Dunes Restoration Project - Commissioner Munn reported that the bid has been awarded. Councilman Bookey asked if they had fulfilled all the bonding requirements and if a start date had been determined. Kornelis stated that the contractors are in the process of getting their bonding requirements met and a start date has not yet been set. Harbor Commission October 7, 1996 Page 1 Commissioner Munn asked if winter weather would set them back any. Kornelis responded that since the pilings will be going into sand, that winter should not hamper them any. B. Additional Floats - Kornelis stated that Jack and Swede are going to be going to Anchorage to look at the floats before Council decides on whether to purchase them or not. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. November Meeting Date - Commissioner Spracher MOVED to postpone the November meeting until December due to the meeting date falling on a holiday. Commissioner Thompson SECONDED the motion. Councilman Bookey stated that he would take request to Council. He stated that if Council did not agree, they would set a November meeting date for the Commission. A vote unanimously approved the motion. B. Kenai River Habitat Restoration - Kornelis stated that there is Exxon Valdez money available through ADF&G. Councilman Bookey stated that Council wanted the Harbor Commission's opinion on whether to support the project. Kornelis stated that it is a pretty wet area and they may have to get a Corps permit to cross the wetlands. He felt that they would probably have to put in about a 3/4 mile stretch of road to allow access to the beach. He stated that the property to the north of the beach is privately owned and goes to the high water mark. This could allow people to become stranded during high tides. Commissioner Munn MOVED to support the restoration enhancement project. Commissioner Thompson SECONDED the motion. A vote was unanimously in favor of the motion. 7. INFORMATION A. Kenai Dock Bent Piling - Komelis stated that the pilings have been filled with concrete. He reported that because they did not know how much concrete would be needed, that the project went $3,000 over. They will have to go back to Council for approval of the overrun. He felt that there should be no more problems with the pilings bending. Harbor Commission October 7, 1996 Page 2 8 COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS Commissioner Jahrig asked if the bluff erosion issue could be brought up at the next meeting. He also wanted to discuss the boatyard and dock leases. Kornelis stated that he was considering having an outcry auction with a minimum opening bid to handle the leases. Councilman Bookey stated that Council was beginning their search for a new City Manager. He also stated that Mayor Williams is concerned about the erosion problems. 9. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Jahrig stated that he would be gone until November 23rd if a November meeting was deemed necessary. Councilman Bookey asked the Commission what date they would request if Council felt that a meeting needed to be held. Everyone agreed to November 4th if a meeting is necessary. The next meeting date was scheduled for December 9th. Commissioner McCubbins MOVED to adjourn. Commissioner Thompson SECONDED the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debby J. Fahnholz J Harbor Commission October 7, 1996 Page 3 -Do CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo October 23, 1996, 7:00 p.m. http://www.Kenai.net/city 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9, 1996 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-67—Revised Preliminary Plat—Ridgeview Estates b. PZ96-68—Preliminary Plat—Aliak Corner Subdivision No. 2 c. PZ96-69—Preliminary Plat —Star of the North Subdivision 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-66—Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission supporting amending the Kenai Municipal Code 14.20.220 to establish signage requirements within the Townsite Historic District Zone 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. Review of Title 14 of the KMC—Cabins b. Application for Lease —Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, C.I.I.A.P. S. OLD BUSINESS: a. PZ96-60—Landscape/Site Plan Review —Tract 4-13-4, (Pad "C") Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park Subdivision 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Kenai City Council Roster b. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board minutes of September 19, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda c. November & December Meeting Schedule Memo 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: Page 2 October 23, 1996 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 23, 1996 ***MINUTES*** 1. ROLL CALL: Members present: Barb Nord, Michael Christian, Karen Mahurin, Phil Bryson, Carl Glick, Teresa Werner-Quade, Ron Goecke Members absent: Others present: Councilman Hal Smalley, City Engineer Jack La Shot, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: BRYSON MOVED TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED AND REQUESTED UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MOTION SECONDED BY GOECKE. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9, 1996 MAHURIN MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 1996. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. Glick stated on Page 8, it should be changed as Mr. Christian's second paragraph states "she" and should be he. Christian stated on Page 3 it should be "sell" instead of sale. Glick asked if any objections to unanimous consent. None noted. MINUTES APPROVED. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-67—Revised Preliminary Plat—Ridgeview Estates WERNER-QUADE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PZ96-67. MOTION SECONDED BY BRYSON. Glick asked for additional staff comments. La Shot on the very last page is the plat the Commission saw recently. This plat reconfigures that plat. La Shot stated it basically forms one tract, Tract A from what was proposed as lots one through four. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 October 23, 1996 Bryson asked for clarification from maker of the motion if intent was that the engineer's recommendation be included. Werner-Quade noted yes. Glick clarified the motion to include engineer's recommendation and asked for other discussion. None. VOTE: BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. b. PZ96-68—Preliminary Plat—Ahak Corner Subdivision No. 2 CHRISTIAN MOVED TO APPROVE PZ96-68. NORD SECONDED THE MOTION. La Shot stated no additional staff comments. No additional Commission comments. VOTE: WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES CHRISTIAN YES MAHURIN YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. c. PZ96-69—Preliminary Plat —Star of the North Subdivision BRYSON MOVED TO APPROVE PZ96-69. MAHURIN SECONDED THE MOTION. La Shot stated no additional staff comments and no contingencies. Christian stated he was curious on lot two why lot line has such an angle. La Shot noted the surveyor was present adding he may be able to answer the question. La Shot stated he thought it was put in to the appropriate setbacks. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 October 23, 1996 McLane, surveyor, stated the offset is parallel to the house structure rather than perpendicular to the street to maintain the 15 feet offset. McLane commented if the structure residence qualifies for a 10 foot setback, he would like the ability to arrange that with staff. McLane noted it is a split level house with a basement rather than a true two story. McLane added he is not sure of code. McLane stated that would allow more space between property and the church property. La Shot stated staff can take a look and if it qualifies for setback staff would not be opposed to the change. VOTE: GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-66—Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission supporting amending the Kenai Municipal Code 14.20.220 to establish signage requirements within the Townsite Historic District Zone MAHURIN MOVED TO APPROVE PZ96-66. BRYSON SECONDED THE MOTION. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: Michael Huhndorf, member of Townsite Historic District Board (TSH), commented that the board had discussed the special nature and flavor of a historic district due to it's visibility. Huhndorf stated the district as it sits because of it's location and trying to create a consistency in appearance of signs as the board has stated and discussed be changed to reflect the flavor of the historic district. Huhndorf noted that they did realize that the comments were taken by the city attorney regarding content and restricting the rights to freedom of speech. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Mahurin noted this has been a long-standing project from TSH. Mahurin stated that she believes that with the diminished size of Old Town that it is important that we do have a district flavor to that area. Mahurin added there is a lot of development going on. Mahurin stated she will support this resolution adding she appreciates the work of the TSH and think the Commission should support their efforts. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 Minutes October 23, 1996 Goecke apologized and asked indulgence noting he didn't get packet until today. Goecke commented we have gone over and over this sign code in the city and stated he is not totally convinced that we need to have one more sign code in this city. Goecke commented he doesn't necessary like the one we have much less add another one. Goecke noted being a business person you cannot actually have too much signage. Goecke agreed it can be over done in some instances adding he has voted against some signs. But, don't think that we need to have an inclusive sign code for the a given area. Goecke stated he feels that our sign code as we have it is sufficient for our city. Bryson commenting regarding Section 14.22.20 F(1) which describes intent of the ordinance. Bryson read, "It is intended that the sign..." asking who is going to interpret the phrase adding he didn't think he could. Bryson stated he feels that is an arbitrary area that should be clarified. Bryson stated his other comment is the exclusion of electric signs. Bryson noted that in the wintertime when people need business in that area presumably signs would only be visible for six hours of a day. Mahurin stated she knows that TSH has also talked about street lighting and with the projects going on to pave and widening of the road, there are a lot of things board is working on and talking about. Mahurin stated she agrees and doesn't think there should be electric signs. Mahurin noted that the Russians didn't have signs and that is all that is left of that era. Mahurin, noting she doesn't want to disagree with Mr. Bryson, but F1 is an intent as to why they feel there should be a special sign code for that area. Mahurin agreed that it is rather nebulous adding she felt a building inspector could help with that. Mahurin noted this is their statement of why they want a special sign code for that area. Mahurin stated she agrees with all these portions. Mahurin noted it doesn't say there can't be lights but says there will not be garish lights in that part of town. Mahurin stated that is what the ordinance is intended to do. Werner-Quade concur with Ms. Mahurin's comments adding she thought the same thing on the electric signs. Werner-Quade stated this brings to mind law offices of Cowan adding she thinks they may have lights that shine from the rafters that shine on the signs at night. Werner-Quade stated she feels this is in keeping with what the TSH has in mind. Werner-Quade commented she was pleased to see this come before us expeditiously rather than waiting to review the entire sign ordinance. Werner-Quade noted she will vote in favor of this resolution. Bryson questioned staff if there is a portion of the sign code that addresses electric signs and differentiates from lighted signs? La Shot stated he doesn't believe it does. La Shot stated this was intended to not allow electric signs but to allow indirectly lighted signs of a smaller nature. La Shot stated the first paragraph on intent that there is not too much administration can do about that when issuing a permit. La Shot stated it does say in relation to size. The ordinance was tailored to try to have something definitive that administration could use when it came time to issue a sign permit and keep it as simple as possible while reflecting the needs of the zone. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 Minutes October 23, 1996 Goecke noted that didn't answer his question. Goecke commented that even with this there is no distinct one sign other than flashing signs and any electric signs that will be permitted. Goecke stated that the intent "thing" seems to leave everything in the open to a particular individual's interpretation. Goecke commented you can interpret it one way and I'll read it and interpret it another way and who's to say who is right. Werner-Quade commented that the last line after the comma says, "and be of a size that is in scale with the building and street scape as a whole." Werner-Quade commented that it does leave a little bit to be desired adding she is getting tired of these people who cannot interpret the simple, basic, plain English. 'Verner-Quade commented that if a problem arose, it would seem like those people would go before the TSH board and the Board would make a ruling as to the sign. Werner-Quade added that in her opinion you can find a loop hole anywhere you want but lets get down to plain English and read it and go with it. Bryson stated he would have to respond to that. Bryson stated if it were an issue with the building code and the city building inspector interprets it one way and you interpret it another way, do you feel you have a valid concern when it is ruled against you. Werner-Quade stated you can always go to a higher board adding she doesn't see why we have to specify every detail. Werner-Quade noted she doesn't see where the intent is that loose. Goecke stated he has to ask a question, Werner-Quade made mention if you want to put a sign there go to the Historic Board and see if this is okay. Goecke stated he doesn't know if the Board has any control of the matter. Werner-Quade stated she would correct that statement because she had said if there was a problem. Werner-Quade commented that Goecke is saying that there is going to be a problem with every sign. Goecke responded that he didn't say that but there is the possibility of that problem existing. Mahurin suggested in order to expedite this professionally, she would suggest that Ms. Werner-Quade's intent of her comments, were that if someone had a question that the TSH could interpret what their sign ordinance meant for anyone and would be available as a resource to people to answer those types of questions. Werner-Quade thanked Ms. Mahurin adding she was sure she had came across as curt. Glick clarified that if there was a problem you are saying that the TSH board would make a recommendation to P&Z. Werner-Quade noting she is not on the board so would not have every answer but would wanted to rebut the two comments made by two members about the verbiage being vague. Mahurin would like to bring this item back to the ordinance instead of trying to interpret each other questions but what the Commission is trying to do. Mahurin noted Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 October 23, 1996 that what is before the Commission is an ordinance for a signage ordinance for Old Town. Mahurin stated she would like to call for question. VOTE: NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON NO WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE NO GLICK YES MOTION PASSED, 5-2. 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. Review of Title 14 of the Mahurin—Cabins Nord not sure what council is trying to get at but think they want us to make a determination on what definitions for cabin and cabin rentals. Nord added she is not sure if they want us to put limitations on size. Glick think this came about because of three cabins on lot and man wanted to rent them out. Councilman Smalley noted that was on James Street. Nord noted that was before she came to P&Z. Glick at this point we are to look at it, discuss it, and decide if there needs to be changes. Glick asked La Shot if staff had input. La Shot noted it has been a problem in the past. Because there is not a definition in code as to what a cabin is. The Land Use Table has a designation for cabins but we're not sure if an accessory structure or a principal structure. La Shot stated that from the administration's standpoint it needs to be cleaned up. La Shot added that there is a growing use of cabins in the city for not only recreational/commercial use but there are times people want to add to property as a secondary or accessory use. Werner-Quade commented she had gone over this again and again and what it boiled down to is this. Werner-Quade noted she had called the city attorney and cleared up a couple things. On the memo in the packet the problem seems to arise as referring in one instance as a cabin rental and next instances of cabin rentals. Werner-Quade stated that in the definition department of Title 14 we may need as many as three new definitions. One, a definition of cabin —Mr. Graves has it under the Collegiate Dictionary definition. Second would be cabin rental —that would refer to one cabin. And, third, cabin rentals —referring to more than one cabin. Werner-Quade explained the reason why is because when you start mixing rental in one paragraph and rentals in the next paragraph, you have a problem with singular and plural. In the Land Use Table, there are provisions for cabin rentals. In commercial, there is a provision for Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 October 23, 1996 hotels and motels. Werner-Quade noted that in the definitions, motel is about as close as you come to cabins. Werner-Quade reiterated that cabin needs to be defined. Werner-Quade stated she checked the FHA requirements for a dwelling since there is going to be some difference if the cabin is a dwelling or a cabin. Under FHA guidelines the minimum square footage to qualify as a dwelling, without a bedroom, is 310 square feet. Anything under 310 square feet would not qualify as a dwelling. Werner-Quade commented that Mr. Richmond's cabins being around 200 square foot each would not qualify as a dwelling, single family or otherwise. Werner-Quade commented they would have to be cabins. Werner-Quade commented that she knew it is hard to understand adding she will be getting a copy of the federal square footage requirements if anyone would like to look at it. Werner-Quade stated that in the end you would have a definition of cabin for anything under 310 square foot. Cabin rental -one cabin. You could continue with the dwelling definition. Cabin rental would be more or less the motel definition. Werner-Quade commented they could look at that and take out and add in anything under 310 square feet. Werner-Quade noted that in order to get a loan from FHA it has to be 310 square feet. Werner-Quade stated it ends up that the CUP would be for cabin rentals in an RR zone only and there would never be a CUP in an RS zone. Werner-Quade noted that is according to what we have now. Nord stated she had checked with Alaska Housing regulations for a dwelling and they have no square footage. Their regulation is if it is under 600 square feet they may require additional down payment. Nord noted they actually have no square footage regulations adding they are one of the toughest lenders to satisfy. Werner-Quade noted the suggestion from the city attorney was to provide for what kind of a rental, nightly, monthly so that wasn't so vague and the square footage needs to be in there. Christian stated he would like to add that he thinks we do need to define each of these. It sounds like circumstances that a person may want to rent a cabin in summer for shorter time and longer in the winter. Christian stated that if that is true there is a need to define if this is a dwelling for long term or is this dwelling for weekly or daily. Fact of cabin rental or rentals needs to be defined noting that cabin rentals is in land use but doesn't fit with cabin rental, singular. Christian noted his agreement of the need to define all three. Goecke noted he understands where Christian coming from but the Commission may want to be concerned how we word this because if I have some apartments and you want to rent one of those apartments and don't require a lease you might be there a week, month, a year of months. Goecke stated as Ms. Nord stated with Alaska Housing not stipulating anything square footage wise, anybody's apartment could fall under this scenario. Goecke stated he understands but if we aren't ultra careful with wording everybody who owns apartments if they do not require lease could have a problem. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 Minutes October 23, 1996 Mahurin commenting that since City Attorney sat at council and has worked on this if the Commission should have him draft something that meets the needs and then discuss it at the next meeting. Glick asked the Commission if they agreed to have staff come back with that information and a resolution. Smalley asked if the Commission will you give him a specific list of items. Glick noted it would be based on the things discussed. Goecke stated if the secretary would give him a copy of what was discussed, that should be sufficient. Goecke noted that if something happens he will have to defend this. Mahurin added the fact that he was at the council meeting, heard discussion, heard the appeal, Mrs. Swarner brought it up and it is in the minutes, and as Goecke stated P&Z minutes will show our concern. Mahurin stated she would like to see something before the Commission and to work from there. Glick directed staff to bring something back to P&Z for review. b. Application for Lease —I.ots 13 and 14, Block 1, C.I.I.A.P. GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL THE APPLICATION FOR LEASE. MAHURIN SECONDED THE MOTION. Glick asked if there were additional staff recommendations. La Shot asked the Commission to note the recommendation that the approval be contingent on finishing up the environmental work. La Shot commented that is coming along quite well. Tony Blomfield, applicant spoke to the Commission. Blomfield noted that in talking with Kim Howard, she mentioned that it may be possible for the P&Z Commission to also approve, assuming that they approve the lease, the site plat at this time. Blomfield noted he understands that is a later requirement. Glick stated he doesn't see why we couldn't and asked the rest of the Commission how they felt. Christian commented that it looks as if you intend to have this done by next year. Blomfield commented this is a fast track job. Blomfield noted that within the RFP by the State of Alaska, they are requiring occupancy by July 1st. Blomfield added there is no penalty for late delivery, other areas of the document, once the award is made, allow for renegotiating to potentially change some items of the bid. Blomfield noted it is his understanding that the site would be turned over about the first of February. Blomfield stated they do not anticipate the award until probably the first of December. Blomfield noted they would be going through plan development in the months of December and January and would expect to break ground concurrent with the environmental clean up being complete. Blomfield stated they would allow four months to construct the facility. Goecke stated he had a question of staff. Is there a problem with approving the site plan tonight. La Shot stated only if there would be substantial changes that would come about during preliminary design. La Shot suggested they make a submittal for Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 October 23, 1996 the site lan at the same time as building permit submittal. La Shot commented that p since it is winter he didn't feel it would tie them up too much. La Shot added he wasn't aware that they wanted to ask for the site plan review tonight. Goecke asked if your site plan review be different than what you have proposed here on this site and parking plan. Blomfield stated they do not anticipate any changes. Blomfield added they would recognize that through normal building permit review adding he doesn't know if the city has a landscape review. Blomfield noted that at this time it shows the number of trees and landscaped areas but not specifically the type. Blomfield stated they would be agreeable to having the site plan review subject to a landscaping review. Blomfield explained the reason he is asking for this is that RFP states that offers which depend on gaining approval of zoning actions which are to be taken or approved after the closing date of this RFP will be rejected without further review. Blomfield stated that assuming that they get the approval on the lease, it is his opinion that that takes care of it. If the P&Z, at a later date has to review other items of the proposal, it may be brought up in a protest of the award and complicate the process not only for myself but for any other bidder. Blomfield noted for instance assuming that Carr Gottstein will be bidding the job in the old Carrs center, if that building is to be remodeled and is subject to Planning and Zoning review and they have not done that. They may not be eligible for aware. Blomfield stated he was wanting to assure himself that there is not a loophole available to a potential protester that may or may not catch this requirement. Goecke asked if it would be at this point prudent for us to decide whether this site and parking plan amongst the Commissioners is agreeable. Goecke asked if this is enough information for the rest of the Commissioners. Mahurin stated she had questions of the applicant and then they might satisfy her. Glick stated he would like the Commission to vote on the application for the lease and get that settled and then the Commission can decide on the landscape plan. VOTE ON APPLICATION FOR LEASE: CHRISTIAN YES WERNER-QUADE YES NORD GLICK YES YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. BRYSON GOECKE MAHURIN YES YES YES Glick noted that since the Commission is still under New Business the Commission could take up the Landscape/Site Plan review. Glick asked the wishes of the Commission. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 10 Minutes October 23, 1996 La Shot stated that from administrations point of view he does not believe there would be a problem with the landscape portion with the contingency that the administration verify adequate parking and draining at building permit submittal time. La Shot noted that offhand it looks adequate but staff has not have chance to review the plan as regards to code and space requirements. Goecke asked La Shot if he would want to include if the site plan is going to be different than what is here, that it needs to be submitted at that time? La Shot stated if there were substantial changes in this plan, he would request it be re -reviewed by the Commission. Blomfield stated he would have no objection to that adding that he would suggest that the Commission keep it loose and give staff a maximum amount of authority to request changes. Blomfield stated it was not his intent to tie the city or P&Z Commission or the staff to that plan it is just that the plan may be approved in concept subject to final approval by staff. Mahurin stated she understands what Blomfield is trying to do and would like to facilitate the plan. However, Mahurin noted that landscaping is a primary interest to her and feels as a Commissioner she has been stung by other businesses in the area. Mahurin stated she is not comfortable with not having something in front of her that is the final plan to vote on it. Mahurin noted she understands that Blomfield needs some latitude. Mahurin stated she can't vote on something that says it will be something like this but it is not. Mahurin stated she wanted to clarify her stance before asking questions. Mahurin stated Blomfield stated all non -paved areas will be landscaped. Mahurin asked what that means, grass? Blomfield explained that the perimeter of the building is bermed around the entire perimeter of the building about ten feet out and slopes up roughly three feet. The balance of the area will be planted in grass to coordinate with the adjacent courthouse building. The number of trees shown will be provided in a mix of both deciduous and evergreen at whatever caliper the Commission requests. Blomfield explained that typically they put inch and a half caliber on new construction projects. Blomfield stated they try to get completed landscape that looks like it has been there a number of years rather than planting to code minimum. Blomfield stated that this particular landscape plan has a $30,000 budget in the plan at this time and will keep it at a minimum and may elect to go higher. Blomfield explained that is the subcontract amount and does not include the general contractor's markup. Blomfield stated they have done a lot of new development and feel that that is an adequate budget for what they are trying to do and want it to complement the state courthouse. Christian stated he would like to echo what Mahurin said about landscaping being a problem. Christian explained if the Commission sounds overly picky it is because we do want to make sure it will look the way you say it is going to look. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 October 23, 1996 Blomfield stated if it is a problem to the council, he stated he doesn't think it is that important adding it just crosses one more "t" and dots one more "i" in my proposal. Blomfield stated he would be happy to put up a landscape bond it that satisfies the Commission. MAHURIN STATED SHE WOULD BE COMFORTABLE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A SITE/LANDSCAPING PLAN INCORPORATING LA SHOTS SUGGESTIONS UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PARKING IS SOMETHING THAT CAN BE WORKED OUT WITH STAFF BECAUSE THERE IS A CODE FOR THAT. MAHURIN, CONTINUING, AS FAR AS THE SITE PLAN, NOTED THAT WHAT SHE IS LOOKING AT IS WHAT SHE EXPECTS TO SEE. MAHURIN STATED SHE WOULD LIKE THE MOTION TO READ IF THERE IS ANY DEVIATION FROM THIS SITE PLAN, IT SHOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO PLANNING AND ZONING. Blomfield noted the bid proposal includes curb and gutter around the paved area as a transition from paving to landscape. Again, Blomfield stated it is their intention to improve on the city courthouse landscaping. Blomfield noted that personally he feels they could have done a better job on the mix of trees. Glick asked Mahurin if that was a motion. Mahurin stated in a vague way. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION.. Mahurin stated she would like to say she is pleased and excited about the development with what is going in there. Mahurin reiterated Mr. Christian's statement that they are supportive of the project. Blomfield advised that this is going to be a very difficult job to get with new construction and the type of facility they are offering. Blomfield stated they do have some advantage in that they are awarded extra points for quality. Nonetheless, there are existing buildings adding they do not expect to be the low bidder but expect to prevail once price and extra points are awarded. Blomfield reiterated there is no guarantee. Chairman Glick asked if the Commission understood the motion. VOTE ON LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN: CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 12 October 23, 1996 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. PZ96-60—Landscape/Site Plan Review —Tract 4-13-4, (Pad "C") Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park Subdivision GOECKE MOVED TO BRING PZ96-60 BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSION. MOTION SECONDED BY CHRISTIAN. Glick asked La Shot if there were additional staff comments. La Shot noted there was additional information in packet and that Mr. Norville was in attendance to answer questions. Christian noted that one of his biggest concerns when this was first brought up was what will be seen from the highway. Christian noted the first plan had a fence between the highway and the building. Norville asked if there was a site plan available to put up to use as a visual aide? Norville explained the design has been changed. The original design split face facing the shopping center. It was changed so the front of the building was all blocked. Christian asked for clarification on which was the front and was advised the part facing Carrs. Norville explained that development today, if you look at power centers, being where you have two or three major stores, you access through the front rather than through mall, and satellite stores around. Norville advised he has been building for 30 years and you have to make it convenient for the customer. Ideally you would put the parking in front where it would be convenient for the customer and facing the Spur Highway. Because of the depth of lot have to make it convenient for the customer and for the tenant. So, the entrance will be facing the east and west. Norville advised there will be two tenants in this building. And, the entrance facing the center because that is where the parking will be. Norville reiterated that you have to make it convenient for the person coming in. Christian stated that didn't answer his question and asked if anything has changed as far as what is facing the highway. Christian stated his concern is what will be seen when driving through town. Norville stated it has changed from the original plan in that it had a fence in the front. Christian clarified he was talking about the back and Norville stated the portion facing the Spur Highway. Norville stated it is split -faced and there is a fence in the middle on the portion facing the Spur Highway to shelter the electric and mechanical that will be there. Norville stated it is split -faced and there will be a small fence and that is just the configuration of the building. Norville stated they chose to put it there rather than facing the side. Christian stated that is the problem that he has adding it is serious to him because I don't want it to be ugly driving through town. Christian stated if there is an electrical Planning & Zoning Commission Page 13 Minutes October 23, 1996 thing, a fenced off area, or a dumpster as I drive through town that is what I will see. Norville stated he doesn't build ugly buildings. Norville added it will be attractive and is being build for the convenience of customers and so the tenants can do business. Norville stated the entrances have to be adjacent to the parking. Christian stated he doesn't have a problem with that and you can have entrances where you want. Christian stated he has a hard time seeing that as something that will enhance the area. Norville commented he felt it would be attractive. Christian stated he thought he would have to see it adding they don't have a large amount of vegetation to block. Norville stated the land in front is owned by the state so subject to what they do. Norville showed plan on the bulletin board and explained plan and building. Norville commented there will be a fence but that it will not make it look like a back yard. The original plans had a black wall and without some of the windows. Norville stated he had had the same concerns that the Commission has so had the architect make changes. Norville showed that and commented that the fence is in this small area. Norville commented there is a problem, where do you put the dumpster. If you put it here, here, or here, it will be visible. Norville stated they felt they found the best place, least objectionable would be here. Christian asked how do we get to it. Norville showed how traffic would flow. Christian questioned what kind of fence? Norville stated he believed it was cedar but would have to look at the plans. Christian questioned how high. Norville stated he thinks 6 feet. Goecke noted that was the Commission's big concern last time around was the fact of that fence, we had no idea how tall the fence would be or what would be there. Goecke stated they had pretty much surmised that that is where the dumpster would be and that we have the problem with. That being the case, that is why this was dropped and put on hold. Goecke continued, in looking at your plan and I know why you are doing what you are doing, I don't know that you said that you would be able to drive through there. Goecke noted with a dumpster you will not be able to drive through. Goecke stated you have plans, or hopefully, to go on either side on those pads and develop those too. Goecke asked if any thought given to putting your dumpster between these pads and letting them share, or is it your idea, or does your lessee pay for own trash removal. Norville noted there is a driveway between each pad. Norville stated it wouldn't be safe or practical to have them cross over a driveway and you must be careful and it must be enclosed. It is a problem but where do you put the trash. Norville reiterated they felt the best way to treat it would be to finish off the front and make it look like the rest of the center and put the dumpster where it would service both stores. Goecke asked if that was the plan to have one dumpster for two stores. Norville stated from a practical and aesthetic point, it makes sense. And, from the standpoint of the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 14 October 23, 1996 tenant and the convenience of the customer it makes much more sense. Goecke commented that he feels a lot more comfortable this time than I did last time. Norville noted that when the center is completed it will be over 300,000 square feet. Norville stated they feel it will be the destination center of the peninsula adding they want to make sure it is done correctly. Mahurin noted she was not at the last meeting adding she had read the minutes and had been listening carefully. Mahurin stated she still has a lot of concerns. Mahurin stated she thinks it is great all of the trees but thinks it would better if they were facing the Spur Highway. Mahurin stated she has seen many businesses in Anchorage and other cities noting she has traveled extensively that could certainly do landscaping facing the Spur Highway and fence in a very attractive way a dumpster some place in the parking area that doesn't have to be facing the Spur Highway. Mahurin noted that there has been extensive road and grass and bicycle paths put in. Mahurin stated she is very concerned with this building facing Spur Highway as it is. Norville stated that as a developer you have to develop in a practical way. Norville stated he thinks the building will be nice adding he doesn't care where you put the dumpster you will have to put fence. Norville added he thinks they have the best solution. Norville added one more thing about the state noting that he has met with them twice and has asked permission to improve that area. Norville stated he is very concerned about how that looks but doesn't own that property and can only ask permission and if they don't want to do anything and won't let him do anything, there is nothing he can do about it. Mahurin noted she wasn't saying she was concerned with state property. Mahurin stated she is concerned that trees go this way and nothing going this way. Mahurin stated she understands that you are looking at it from developer's standpoint adding she is looking at it from a perspective that she is here to do a best job for the city. That is to encourage business but at the same time maintain a comfortable environment that they have tried to maintain. Mahurin asked Norville not to think not she in favor of development. Mahurin stated that at this point she cannot see herself voting yes for this site plan. Goecke, speaking to Mr. Norville, you've stated that you have talked to the state about doing something out there. Goecke stated he thinks there is some concern adding he doesn't necessarily share this anymore, wonder, talking about a six foot fence, 12 feet long. Norville stated he would have to go through the plans. Goecke stated it doesn't really matter. Goecke asked staff, if he thinks it would be possible to get permission from the state and outside of that fence, though it is on state property, if there could be four short trees, that don't get too tall, planted to block that fence. Goecke noted this is the main concern. Norville, stated he would have no problem with that. Goecke stated he understands that but does the state have a problem. Goecke asked Norville, as a developer, see yourself putting trees on state property. Norville stated not without permission. Goecke stated his question is to staff if they could help get permission to Planning & Zoning Commission Page 15 Minutes October 23, 1996 put four trees on there. La Shot stated he can't speak for the state. La Shot stated he felt a motion from the Commission lending support to the issuance of a permit for Mr. Norville to do some landscaping in the state right of way in front of the building would be reasonable. La Shot stated that since completed the project that what is between bike path and the property is scrub brush. La Shot stated he felt they would be sticky because if anything out there is subject to removal because if a utility needs to go through there. La Shot added he felt that some reasonable landscaping is something they can live with. Norville stated that is very subjective as the person at the state he had spoken to thought it was beautiful. He said leave it the way it was. Norville added he would do everything he could to put trees in there. Norville stated he wants the Commission to know this would look nice. GOECKE AMENDED THE MOTION TO HAVE STAFF CONTACT THE STATE IN MR. NORVILLE'S BEHALF OR THE COMMISSION'S BEHALF OR GET PERMISSION TO PLANT SOME TREES TO COVER UP THAT FENCE THAT HE DESIRES TO PUT THERE ON THE OTHER FRONT OF THE BUILDING. NORD SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. Mahurin questioned if we approve the site plan contingent on something the state might do and the state doesn't do it, where does that leave us. Mahurin noted that leaves an approved site plan with a fence and dumpster facing the Spur Highway. Smalley stated that was exactly his concern adding that perhaps word should be to encourage. Smalley stated that perhaps staff should present comments and concern of this body to the state. Smalley stated he didn't think the Commission can pass something that neither the city or developer have any control over. Smalley added they could probably say to encourage the allowance of the ability to plant those trees and present the concept in writing and the comments to the state. Christian questioned the use of the word trees adding perhaps something else would be more appropriate like a bush. Christian commented that a lot of times you plan a tree and two years later it is dead. Christian suggested use vegetation or landscaping rather than word trees. Christian suggested that maybe they could just mound it up and grass it over, that would be permanent. Something that would have vegetation rather than trees. Mahurin bring attention back to motion which says we approve the site plan and ask the city for help to assist with landscaping on state land. Mahurin noted she agrees with the term landscaping. Mahurin reiterated that if we approve it and the state says no, we still have it as is. Norville noted the code specifies what the landscaping should be adding he is meeting all the requirements of the code and to require me to go on someone else's property I don't think would be fair. Mahurin noted that is what she is saying. Norville stated Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 16 October 23, 1996 they would do anything to make it possible but if the state says no, there is nothing they can do. Mahurin stating she is not saying that we should, instead, she is saying that if that happens and we have already approved your site plan and the state says no. Then, the Commission cannot expect you to do this but the site plan would remain as is. Mahurin noted she is just making the point to the Commission. Norville stated he was making the point that we do meet code. Norville stated that if aesthetically it is not what you think it should be, we can improve it. Norville added he can see no reason why they would say no. Christian is there anyway we could find out about this in a short time, perhaps at the next meeting. Mahurin commented that she hate to be lobbied by other Commissioners. Bryson stated he would like to clarify his comments noting we are only talking 40 feet. Bryson asked how many trees do we get in 40 feet. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON ABSTAIN WERNER-QUADE NO GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES AMENDMENT PASSED. Christian asked Norville where they intend to sign the building? Norville stated the restrictions that he places on his tenants in the center are more restrictive than the city's code in terms of type, color, size. Norville noted he didn't bring a copy of a lease but it sets out more requirements. Christian stated he would like specific answer and questioned if they would be on poles? Norville noted they are not allowed poles by code. Norville stated there will be black lettering on the face of the building. They will be individual signs. Norville stated he didn't have the dimensions but the lease specifies size. Christian clarified they will be on the building and no other signs outside. Norville stated he didn't believe they were allowed additional signs. La Shot stated he thinks they may have used up the square footage on that site. La Shot noted the type of signs Norville is describing are not regulated as signs. That type of sign on the wall goes with the building. Norville commented that signage is extremely important to him. Mahurin asked Norville who will be leasing the sites and if it is being revealed? Norville stated he is not revealing it but it will basically be fast food and video. VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED: Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes BRYSON ABSTAIN GOECKE YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED. Page 17 October 23, 1996 WERNER-QUADE NORD CHRISTIAN YES YES YES Mahurin stated she would like to comment to Mr. Norville noting he has heard the comments about landscaping adding Mr. Smalley has written me notes saying you are reputable. Mahurin noted she is doing something that is hard, that being she is trusting. Mahurin commented she likes to shop in this center but could go elsewhere. Mahurin stated she didn't mean that as a threat but would be watching. Norville commented he lives in this community adding he is a hands-on developer. 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council Councilman Smalley noted a copy of the agenda in packet with notes. Vice -Mayor Measles reelected. The city of Kenai donated the old ambulance to the community of Ninilchik. Smalley stated he remembers when he taught there and they bought a Korean "meat" wagon as their first ambulance and they were elated. To them it was in equal value as the $125,000 Kenai has. Under public comment, a young man spoke from Cook Inlet requesting the use of aluminum bleachers from the softball field until they get their bleachers. This was approved conditional upon determining the ownership of the bleachers as they could have been purchased with softball funds. This is being researched. The city is also requesting an attachment on their insurance rider and they will be responsible for transporting and returning the bleachers. Ordinances, C1 was the potential aluminum floats that the city looking into purchase. Upon inspection it was determined it was not that they are not what the city wanted. The minimum fine ordinance on the improved rights of way within the city, primarily the bike paths to Swires, restricting motorized vehicular traffic and setting the fine to go with it. Smalley reported that the fine remained at $100 minimum conditioned upon repair of damage to any grass lands or structures that may be there. It was amended it to allow the state or the city or a contracted entity to enter the right of way for purposes of snow removal and/or maintenance. Smalley advised this item brought about quite a bit of discussion. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 18 Minutes October 23, 1996 Mahurin stated she thought the previous ordinance said as long as you were going to an approved right of way or path you could ride on it to get there. Smalley the only thing that has been changed is improved rights of ways. Glick asked if that means in front of our houses where we have planted between private property and the city's paved street, even though it is city property, we maintain it. Does the city consider that improved rights of way. Smalley stated he believed the city could in fact ticket. Ordinance 1721-96 was bringing code into line. Item four, is the donated ambulance. Item five, declared surplus the Mack fire engine which the petroleum tech center has been taking care of it anyway. This was a mater of taking care of the paperwork to turn it over to them. Item 6, the warm storage building got a new door. Alaska Municipal League dues were paid. The League runs from the 16th to the 20th of November at the Sheraton. Smalley stated he believed half of the council plans to be there. Item 8, is the new hopper spreader to be placed on the new dump truck. They will take the one off the Mack and put in on the other one so the city has another sander/spreader. All council members were kept on the same committees if we wished to remain there. Comment concerning the P&Z item of the last meeting of the HOP in Inlet Woods. When these HOP permits it was requested that administration clarify it in the code when neighbors be notified because the code doesn't require it. Smalley stated that this was something for the Commission to think about. Presentation of the Beautification Committees of the banners. Smalley asked Nord to explain what had transpired since she is also a member of the Beautification Committee. Nord explained they had contacted the Art Guild. The Guild agreed to put together a plan and use some of the local talent. Nord explained the costs and that the banners have been tested extensively. Nord commented they are very nice. Smalley stated the plan is for a 3 year time frame to purchase 30 each year. The first 30 will be $125, $25 for rights to use the design. They will go up when ready. Nord stated they should be ready by May 1st. If something should go wrong, we don't have to send them away. Nord stated they are guaranteeing them for three years. Smalley commented this celebrates our own local artists. Smalley stated to clarify for the record, the Art Guild has a $1 lease for that facility from way back when and it has just been renewed. The Challenger steering committee had a luncheon and meetings held with the Alaska Aeronautical Commission who was in town. They gave a nice presentation of the facility in Kodiak. This was in between step. Smalley advised the Chancellor was very excited and the group is extremely active and able to put forth some grant funding to send lobbyist to Seattle for a day to visit the center in Seattle so they can have a hands on and know exactly what it is. Smalley noted there is a big push to get funding through grant and corporate funding. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 19 Minutes October 23, 1996 There was discussion of the Kenai River Restoration Enhancement Project on the south side of the river. Smalley stated if you go to the last cannery, Inlet Cannery, the road that goes out there and dead ends. That is a city street. The city is looking at either prior to that going at angle out to the beach creating a parking facility where they could walk or drive down and drive on the beach. This would require permits to go through the wetlands. Another way would be to go extending right straight off that road and put parking lot at the end. They don't need to drive on the beach. To encourage them not to do that. It would be easier to place garbage and sanitation facilities on the top. There is quite a bit of grant money that is available and the major portion should be funded by grant. Under New Business, Sanders who was denied the setback at P&Z will present to Board of Appeals on November 6th. The reason why this was set so soon is the gentleman will be out of town and the December meetings are shaky and it met the code by being advertised. Smalley advised he talked with the council about the concept of the gravel bed road behind Lawton to Beaver Creek to the back side of Thompson Park to be considered as a bike path and to look into paving it. DOT is interested in it so when it does work on a roadway improvement they could put a bike path over there rather than on the highway. It would require a thicker coating of asphalt because city uses road. Nord asked Smalley to talk a little about what Mayor was asking Joe Moore to talk to the Airport Commission about bringing jets back in. Smalley stated they were talking about the concept of what if, added they had had jet traffic in the past. Concept from those days from the airlines that they needed four people to get off and on in Kenai. That may have escalated some. Concept is tha there are a lot of carriers between Anchorage and Seattle. Because the Kenai runway will handle it to look at Kenai being a destination again. This would require some modification to building because of security. A different type of jet would have to come to the city that would have a door that would drop down with a ramp or they would have to have ramps here. The Airport Commission will be investigating this possiblity. Christian asked if we will get information when this happens. Clarification as to when the Airport Commission meets again. Group discussion about airport noise from jets. Smalley advised the boat launch facility area brought in about $16,000 from the $5 launches. The dipnet fishery, as a cost to the city for maintenance, extra police patrol, use of Parks and Rec. summer help, etc. came to approximately $10,000. This was a much lower figure than had been anticipated. Well number three is enclosed. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 20 October 23, 1996 Christian asked if something came up that the city is going to start supporting buy locally. Nord stated that was regarding the banners and the statement in the newspaper was misleading. Discussion about the airport rental car vacancy space and if it should remain vacant. At this time, moot, because no one has asked to go in there. Discussion about putting coffee in there, cannot do that because of the restaurant lease. Evaluation of city clerk which was a very good evaluation and her salary increased from $52,000 from $49,000. b. Borough Planning Bryson reported there was a meeting on October 14th agenda is in packet. Bryson stated it was a long meeting and also hit the 12:30 time for completion of the meeting. All items from A through H-4 were approved and then the meeting started. Item H-5 was an appeal of the planning director's decision. Involved an existing gravel pit, adjacent property owners contested the decision with information. Bryson stated from his feeling very good information. The appeal was denied 7-2. Item H-6 was another appeal concerning a gravel pit, denied 8-1. Negotiated land sales, 7-A was approved. 7- B in Point Possession area was recommended denied. Item 7-C approved. Item 7-1) was the option to purchase property which the borough has not received clear title was recommended to be denied. Item 8 recommended to approve setting up advisory commission in Kasilof/Clam Gulch area. All plats approved. Item J-1 applicaton for CUP for Poacher's Cove for construction of car port. Item J-2 approved. Proposed Commission meeting concerning a materials site ordinance. c. Administration La Shot stated that concerning the request from a member of council to consider public hearing, would the Commission like that as a discussion item at a future meeting. Commission stated that would be a good idea. Bryson asked if the request was to have the adjacent properties notified or to have a public hearing. Smalley said notification adding he would assume that would be the request because they would probably want to give testimony. La Shot noted it does make a difference if we send notification after the fact. Regarding the discussion on the airport jet service that we do have a Master Plan which is nearing the draft stage. In talking with the consultants, it is felt public hearings best after the first of the year due to the holidays. La Shot stated that would be a good time to provide input on any issues dealing with the master plan of the airport. Mahurin asked who will hold the hearings? La Shot stated it will probably be a joint Airport Commission and Planning Commission and one at council. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 21 October 23, 1996 La Shot did pass out a letter about some upcoming public hearings concerning the update of the Kenai River Special Management Comprehensive Plan in draft stage. 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Kenai City Council Roster b. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board minutes of September 19, 1996 c. November & December Meeting Schedule Memo 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Mahurin noted this has been an interesting P&Z meeting tonight. Interested to hear about several things. Glad to hear about the city purchasing the 30 banners at $100 which should pay for the roof. Mahurin noted she was interested about the Airport Commission and jets. Appreciate that La Shot already picked up on the HOP adding she didn't realize that neighbors weren't notified. Goecke stated that through the years this body has done a pretty good job, an excellent job, of doing what we thought was best for the city. Regarding this HOP thing, nobody has said where it comes from, nobody had to say. Maybe what we should have also is a public hearing if somebody wants to rent out an apartment that is supposed to be a mother-in-law apartment. Nord advised she will be out of town for the next P&Z meeting at the National Association of Realtor's Convention in San Francisco. Nord stated that regarding the HOP thing agrees there needs to be some input but don't think that a public hearing is necessary. Would have to look at it a little more. Nord would have loved to comment on some of things at the Borough P&Z. Nord questioned why they would deny the lease on 60 acres. Bryson stated the rationale was that it was separated from other properties in the borough adding he is not sure if the borough has clear title either. Christian would like to address the public heairng aspect and notification of neighbors. Maybe not for each individual unit. Christian commented that when someone has a proposal for a piece of land, that people in the neighborhood might know that it is being planned until after it is approved. Christian stated he feels we may not be doing our job. Would like to have us look to see if we could pursue this further. Werner-Quade apologized to the Commission regardin the TSH sign code. At the last meeting, Ms. Mahurin had asked for further information on variances and advised she has some information from law offices in Anchorage. Kenai is a home rule city so we have our own Title 14, nonetheless, this infomration is valuable so will pass it on for next packet. Werner-Quade asked if any of the Commissioners have gone to the restaurant in Old Town and noted it was a nice experience. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 22 Minutes October 23, 1996 Smalley concerning the request that you made of Mr. La Shot to bring someting back from the discussion. Smalley noted another individual also placed a concern because of small children. Some time when you approve a HOP there could be storage of materials or other dangerous materials stored. Concern was that we would like to know so if there is an objection, there is an avenue where they would be noified so if there was a concern so it could come public rather than after the fact. It wasn't an objection to this particular one but wanting to know. Goecke stated he understands what you are saying; however, you said large trucks coming on a regular basis. That is no different than where I live or on Gill Street where apartments are and trucks come and move people in and out. Goecke stated he thinks we have done a good job of making sure that on any HOP that we make sure there is not an excessive amount of traffic. Think this concern isn't valid. Smalley not that one person, several people on the council that weren't aware that it wasn't in the code. Goecke advised his wish that from my standpoint you would tell your fellow council members we feel we are doing what we believe is the best and have the welfare of the citizens in the best interest. 14. ADJOURNMENT: MEETING ADJOURNED AT APPROXIMATELY 9:12 p.m Respectfully Submitted: Marilyn Kebschull Administrative Assistant � CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-301 4 J CITY OF KENAI BACRGROIIND AND PERSONAL DATA - CANDIDATES FOR APPO TO COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS DATE: NAME: How Iona? Residence Address %// % `-. . _ / A NIAN C" iECEl1I D Off 2 KEN141 rI-TY CLEF J Mailing Address �'... , Telephone No.j Business Address LL!�'„ Telephone No. EMPLOYER: Job Title NAME OF SPOUSE: / � �ir1 J� ?� Current membership in organizations: Pas organizational memberships: COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN 0. v YOU ARE INTERESTED: WHY DO YOU WTO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? Signature HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD October 22, 1996- 7:00 p.m. ***AGENDA*** Kenai Council Chambers Chair Dorothy Gray 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 24, 1996 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. HISTORIC BOARD REVIEW: 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. OLD BUSINESS: a. Sign Grant b. Attendance/Possible Change of Meeting Days or Times c. New Members d. TSH Sign Code Ordinance 8. REPORTS: 9. INFORMATION: a. City Council Agenda —October 2 W 6, 1996 b. Kenai City Council Roster c. "The Alaska Association for Historic Preservation" Newsletter 10. BOARD QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: BRING YOUR TSH SURVEY REPORT TO THE MEETING! HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD October 22, 1996- 7:00 p.m. ***AGENDA*** Kenai Council Chambers Chair Dorothy Gray The Commission started their meeting with a work session to fill out "Property Criteria -Rating Sheets" for the Sign Grant. These worksheets were used to choose which property owners would be sent letters asking for permission to sign their property. (7:00 - 7:55 p.m.) 1. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dorothy Gray, Ethel Clausen, Kim Booth, Michael Huhndorf, Rebecca Godek Members Absent: Alan Boraas, Bill Kluge Also Present: Jack La Shot -City Engineer, Kathy Woodford-Admin. Asst. Councilman Joe Moore 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson Dorothy Gray asked for changes to the Agenda. There being none, the Agenda was approved by Unanimous Consent. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 24, 1996 MOTION Rebecca Godek Moved to approve the September 24, 1996 Historic District Board Minutes. Mike Huhndorf Seconded. There being no further objections the Minutes were Approved by Unanimous Consent. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. HISTORIC BOARD REVIEW: 6. NEW BUSINESS: Page 2 Historic District Board 10/22/96 7. OLD BUSINESS: a. Sign Grant Gray stated that the Property Criteria -Rating worksheets have been done and the following properties do not qualify because no criteria exists; either they're not old enough or they have been radically changed and they would not be eligible for signs: Toyon Villa Apartments; 1010 Alaska Street; Tom's Auto Electric Repair; Mann/Peters house; 517 Overland; Pharmacy/Jahrig Electric building; Beluga RV Park; Bay Arms Apartments; 501 Overland; Petterson house; 504E Upland; Stanford house; Kenai Bible Church; Foss house and Mysing's office. The following properties have been recommended for signs because they have met one or more of the criteria: Dolchok/Juliassen cabin; Cabin #3; Showalter house; March house; Kenai Fire Hall & Jail; Hermansen/Miller house; Three Scandinavian's Cabin; Oskolkoff/Dolchok Cabin; Arness Cabin; Steve King house; Kenai Commercial Co.; Kenai Moose Range Headquarters Shop/Garage; Ray Gee house; Moose Range Headquarters Boat Shed; Fort Kenay; Primary Moose Range Headquarters; Lindgren/Jones house; Miller Cabin; Civic League building, and the Wilson house. Gray asked for comment on the other Moose Range Headquarters buildings, the Quarters and the Office. She said it was originally built in 1949 and then the shop and garage were added on. She added the office was the power plant until 1951 and she would like to see it recommended for signage. It was decided by the Board to add the MRH Quarters and Office to the list of recommended sites for signage. Gray asked for help with the Tomrdle house, stating it perplexed both Joe Moore and !herself. Booth asked why it wouldn't be chosen. Gray said it is not on it's original location, it has been drastically altered, but the man who originally owned it (Berg) ran the Moose Hunting Big Game Club, which was a unique thing at that time. Booth concurred with Gray. Godek noted it does meet the criteria of history. Booth commented that everything changes with time and the fact that some buildings have changed structurally, doesn't mean they are not historically valuable. It was decided by the Board to add the Tomrdle house to the list of recommended sites for signage. Gray said that the buildings that have not been selected were built in the 60's, 70's, 80's, and 90's, with the exception of the Pharmacy/Jahrig Building. Booth asked if it has any real historical significance. Godek read from the Survey Report: Page 3 Historic District Board 10/22/96 "It lost it's historical integrity due to the many modifications it's received. The former Pharmacy/Jahrig Electric property originally a cannery structure, has had a variety of uses since it was moved to it's present location and is noteworthy as one of the early commercial businesses in Kenai prior to the city's incorporation." Godek suggested reconsidering this building. Gray concurred with Godek. It was decided by the Board to add the Pharmacy/Jahrig Building to the list of recommended sites for signage. Gray commented that brings the total to 24 recommended sites for signage. She asked if there were any others in the non -recommended list that the Board may want to reconsider. Huhndorf asked when the Kenai Bible Church was built. Gray said in 1950. Booth asked if it was the first church in town. Gray said no, the first other than the Russian church. Huhndorf noted it had obviously been altered. Gray said that other religious denominations used this building until their own building was constructed. She said it is known to be the first Protestant church. It was decided by the Board to add the Kenai Bible Church to the list of recommended sites for signage. Gray said the Mann/Peters house was built in 1952. She read from the Survey that Mann was a local native leader, commercial fisherman, and a local Union leader. He raised his family here until the late 60's. Since then the house has had several owners. In 1978 Robert Peters purchased the house and made extensive alterations to it. Gray suggested accepting the house for signage because of the history of Mann, the original builder of the house. MOTION Kim Booth Moved to accept the following sites for signage to be forwarded to the State: 1. Dolchok/Juliassen cabin 2. Cabin #3 3. Showalter house 4. March house 5. Kenai Fire Hall & Jail 6. Hermansen/Miller house 7. Three Scandinavian's Cabin 8. Oskolkoff/Dolchok Cabin 9. Arness Cabin Page 4 Historic District Board 10/22/96 10. Steve King house 11. Kenai Commercial Co. 12. Kenai Moose Range Headquarters Shop/Garage 13. Ray Gee house 14. Moose Range Headquarters Boat Shed 15. Fort Kenay 16. Primary Moose Range Headquarters 17. Lindgren/Jones house 18. Miller Cabin 19. Civic League building 20. Wilson house 21. Moose Range Headquarters Quarters 22. Moose Range Headquarters Office 23. Tomrdle House 24. Pharmacy/Jahrig Building 25. Kenai Bible Church 26. Mann/Peters House Michael Huhndorf Seconded the Motion. There being no objections, the Motion Passed Unanimously. b. Attendance/Possible Change of Meeting Days or Times Gray said the City Council accepted the Board's request of a change in meeting date. The next meeting date will be November 18, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. C. New Members Godek suggested having a Public Service Announcement put in the newspaper. It was recommended that Marilyn look into having a PSA put in the paper asking for interested people to apply at City Hall. d. TSH Sign Code Ordinance Gray said the TSH Sign Code Ordinance will be discussed at the Planning & Zoning meeting on the 23`d, and suggested someone from the TSH Board attend. Michael Huhndorf stated that he should be able to attend. 8. REPORTS: Page 5 Historic District Board 10/22/96 9. INFORMATION: a. City Council Agenda —October 2 &16, 1996 b. Kenai City Council Roster c. "The Alaska Association for Historic Preservation" Newsletter 10. BOARD QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS: Woodford reminded Gray that the draft letter to residents asking permission to put signage on their property is in the packet and needs to be approved. The Board reviewed the letter. Booth stated that a deadline for response should be inserted. There was some discussion concerning the size of the signs. It was determined that the size referred to in the draft letter is correct. MOTION Rebecca Godek Moved for approval of the draft letter with a deadline for response included. Kim Booth Seconded. There being no further additions or deletions, the Motion Passed by Unanimous Consent. Godek asked if the Skituk' sign is in the TSH zone. Gray stated that it is not. Godek said that it doesn't have to comply with the TSH sign code, but does it comply with the City's sign code. La Shot stated he would have to look into it, but he doesn't think it's a problem. Huhndorf said he spoke with Kenai Native and Salamatoff concerning funding an archeological survey. They said given certain conditions, they would possibly contribute, but they wished they had been consulted earlier. Gray asked that Skituk' be put on the next agenda. Huhndorf mentioned Bunny Swan's price for the sign, stating he thinks she raised her price to $750 from $500. He said he will talk to her. 11. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further items, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Kathy W odford, ub& Works Admin. Assistant AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1996 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://wvw.Kenai.net/city A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. CERTIFICATION OF OCTOBER 1, 1996 ELECTION 4. MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS OATHS OF OFFICE 5. ELECTION OF VICE MAYOR 6. Agenda Approval 7. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) 1. Clay Nettles - Cook Inlet Academy/Requesting Use of Softball Field Bleachers. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance No. 1718-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $6,100 in the Boating Facility Enterprise Fund for Purchase of New Floats. a. Remove from table. b. Consideration of ordinance. 2. Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code 13.40.020 to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of an Off -Road Vehicle on Bike Paths or Improved Rights -of -Way Within the City. a. Remove from table. b. Substitute Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code 13.40.020 to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of An Off -Road Vehicle on Bike Paths, In Parks, On Improved Rights -of -Way, Or Without Permission of the Property Owner. C. Consideration of ordinance. -1- D. 3. Ordinance No. 1721-96 - Amending the Kenai Municipal Code by Amending KMC 23.25.060(e) to Bring It In Conformity With AS 23.05.080 Regarding Employer Record Keeping of Hours Worked by Exempt Employees. 4. Resolution No. 96-79 - Declaring the 1984 Chevrolet Wheeled Coach Ambulance Surplus and Donating it to the community of Ninilchik. 5. Resolution No. 96-80 - Declaring the 1972 Mack Fire Engine Surplus and Donating It to the Mining & Petroleum Training Service. 6. Resolution No. 96-81 - Awarding a Contract to Randy's Glass, Inc. for the Project Entitled, "Warm Storage #1 Overhead Door Replacement," for the Total Amount of $14,015.40. 7. Resolution No. 96-82 - Transferring $2,300 in the General Fund For Alaska Municipal League Annual Dues. 8. Resolution No. 96-83 - Awarding the Bid for a "Hopper Type Material Spreader" to Sahlberg Equipment Company, Inc. for the Total Amount of $9,527.00. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks & Recreation Commission 6. Planning & Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board C. Challenger Steering Committee d. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board E. MINUTES F. G. 1. *Regular Meeting of October 2, 1996. CORRESPONDENCE OLD BUSINESS 1. Discussion - Kenai River Restoration and Recreation Enhancement Project - South Side of River Mouth. -2- H. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified 2. Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 3. *Ordinance No. 1723-96 - Approving and Adopting the Revised Comprehensive Plan for the City of Kenai and Recommending Adoption by the Kenai Peninsula Borough. 4. *Ordinance No. 1724-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $24,000 in the General Fund for Lobbyist. 5. Discussion - Assignment of Council Liaison Positions to Commissions, Committees and Boards. EXECUTIVE SESSION - City Clerk Evaluation I. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City Manager 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Director 7. Airport Manager J. DISCUSSION R. 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council -3- KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1996 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www.Kenai.net/city ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at approximately 7:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Kenai City Hall Building. A-1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Williams led those assembled in the Pledge of Allegiance. A-2. ROLL CALL Roll was taken by the City Clerk. Present were: Measles, Bannock, Smalley, Williams, Bookey, Swarner and Moore. A-3. CERTIFICATION OF OCTOBER 1. 1996 ELECTION Clerk Freas read the following into the record: CITY OF EffiAiI REGULAR ELECTIONT OF OCTOBER 1, 1996 WE, the members of the Kenai City Council, do hereby certify the results of a canvass of the ballots for the Regular Election of October 1, 1996. FOR CITY COUNCIL: SWARNER, LINDA L. 748 BANNOCK, DUANE 817 GOURLEY, NANCY 446 PROPOSITION NO. 1: YES 665 Write -In: 5 NO 749 ***************************************************************** SPOILED BALLOTS: 23 ABSENTEE BALLOTS RECEIVED: (In person, Personal Representative, Mailed) 137 ABSENTEE BALLOTS COUNTED: QUESTIONED BALLOTS COUNTED: POLL VOTER TURNOUT: 136 9 1.371 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 2 QUESTIONED BALLOTS RECEIVED: 26 MOTION: TOTAL VOTER TURNOUT: 1,516 REGISTERED VOTERS: 4.389 % VOTER TURNOUT: 35% Councilman Smalley MOVED to certify the results of the October 1, 1996 Kenai general election as presented and Councilman Measles SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. A-4. COUNCILMEMBERS OATHS OF OFFICE Mayor Williams swore in Councilmembers Swarner and Bannock and congratulated them on their re -elections. A-5. ELECTION OF VICE MAYOR MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED to nominate Council Measles for Vice Mayor and Councilwoman Swarner SECONDED the motion. There were no other nominations and there were no objections to the nominations. SO ORDERED. A-6. AGENDA APPROVAL Mayor Williams requested the following changes to the agenda: ADD AS: H-6, Schedule Board of Adjustment Hearing Date - Appeal of Delmar Sanders. MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED for approval of the agenda as amended and requested UNANIMOUS CONSENT. Councilman Measles SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. A-7. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Williams noted he had no changes to the consent agenda. MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED for approval of the consent agenda as presented. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 3 Councilman Bannock asked if there would be a public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan. It was noted the public hearing would be at the November 6 meeting. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT B-1. Clay Nettles - Cook Inlet Academy/Requesting Use of Softball Field Bleachers. Clay Nettles - Nettles requested use of some of the city's aluminum bleachers by Cook Inlet Academy for the winter as they had just completed a new gym at the school, but were unable to purchase bleachers. The Academy was requesting use of a set of smaller bleachers from the softball fields by the airport. They would be willing to rent the bleachers if required. Parks & Recreation Director Frates stated he had no problems with their using the bleachers but would want them back in early May. Attorney Graves was asked if there would be any liability problems. He answered he thought there should be a hold harmless agreement signed by the Academy because if there was a structural failure of the bleachers and injuries occurred, the city could be held liable. He added, if council elected to allow the Academy to use the bleachers, he would like some sort of indemnity agreement. City Manager Ross added, he thought it very important to have a hold harmless agreement with some security with it (insurance). Larry Emery - Cook Inlet Academy. Emery stated the school was insured and the school structure was insured. He would have to check whether there was liability insurance. Councilwoman Swarner asked how the bleachers would be transported and if the bleachers were purchased from the city budget. Nettles answered they would be transported by trailer. Frates answered, he believed they were purchased with city funds and cost approximately $1,500. Swarner asked Nettles if they had asked the City of Soldotna. Nettles answered, he tried to speak with the rodeo group and was told they would have to have a meeting of their board to discuss KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 4 the matter. He added, the city's bleachers were a better size for their use and they would dismantle the bleachers in order to transport them and move them into their gym. Councilman Moore stated his concern with the liability especially because they would have to dismantle and reassemble the bleachers. Bookey said he also had some concern in regard to the liability, as well as the bleachers going out of the city boundaries. He added, as a councilmember, he was not comfortable with moving them out of the city. Williams asked if the bleachers had been purchased with city funds or by the Softball Association. Frates answered he did not know but could research the question. MOTION: Councilman Bannock MOVED to allow the use of the bleachers by Cook Inlet Academy pending their signing an indemnification/hold harmless policy. Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. Councilman Smalley requested, as a friendly amendment, to add language to the hold harmless agreement that Cook Inlet Academy would reimburse the city for any damages to the bleachers from their use. Graves stated they would also require the city be listed as additional insured on the policy. Measles requested the ownership of the bleachers be found out in order that they know if the city has the authority to loan the bleachers out. Williams requested Frates to check. VOTE: Measles: Yes Williams: Yes Moore: ' No MOTION PASSED. Bannock: Yes Smalley: Yes Bookey: No Swarner: No Williams noted the use of the bleachers was conditioned on all the items discussed being in place, i.e. insurance, ownership, etc. Williams noted there were students from one of the KCHS government classes in the audience. They introduced themselves as Matthew Miller, Mark Wade, Lance Necessary and Stacey Brewer. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 5 ITEM C: PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1. Ordinance No. 1718-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $6,100 in the Boating Facility Enterprise Fund for Purchase of New Floats. C-la. Remove from table. MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED to remove Ordinance No. 1718-96 from the table. Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. Councilman Measles asked if the ordinance was tabled on introduction. Clerk Freas noted, from the minutes attached to the ordinance, during the last meeting, the motion to amend had not been voted. Graves noted the ordinance had been tabled after introduction. C-1b. . Consideration of ordinance. MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED for adoption of Ordinance No. 1718-96 and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. Williams asked City Manager Ross how administration wanted to proceed with the ordinance. Ross recommended council kill the ordinance. VOTE: Measles: No Bannock: No Smalley: No Williams: No Bookey: No Swarner: No Moore: No MOTION UNANIMOUSLY FAILED. C-2. Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code 13.40.020 to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of an Off -Road Vehicle on Bike Paths or Improved Rights -of -Way Within the City. C-2a. Remove from table. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 6 MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED to remove Ordinance No. 1719-96 from the table and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. C-2b. Substitute Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code 13.40.020 to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of An Off -Road Vehicle on Bike Paths, In Parks, On Improved Rights -of -Way, Or Without Permission of the Property Owner. MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED to substitute Ordinance No. 1719-96 (marked as C-2b) and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. C-2c. Consideration of ordinance. Vesta Leigh - Stated she agreed with the letter of support from Mr. Zagorski which was included with the ordinance and discussed his concerns of allowing motor vehicles to use the bike paths. She questioned whether the substitute would allow the city to charge the state if they came on the paths to remove a fallen tree and damaged the paths and if the ordinance restricted any kind of motorized vehicles on the paths. Graves read KMC 13.40.010 which defines off -road vehicles and emphasized paragraph (b) which states: "...Any motorized vehicle being operated off of the maintained streets and roadways. Graves added, if the city were to prosecute the state for being on the paths in order to do some type of maintenance work, the city may not be successful. Swarner noted there had been some damage to the paths already from a sign being placed on the path warning motorists of the new stop light pattern. Smalley stated he thought repairs would be made in the spring when the road contractor would be watering and fertilizing the new grass, etc. He was concerned about the curb cut by Tinker which joins a private driveway and the bike path. Kornelis stated he thought the curb had been replaced with a barrier curb. Smalley stated people had been driving over the grass and tearing up the grass. Smalley added, he has had citizens ask him why one side of the road could not be opened up KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 7 for motorized vehicles and leave the other for other use. He has answered the asphalt was designed for non -motorized vehicles and was not meant to take the weight of motorized vehicles. Williams asked if the ordinance required language to exempt city maintenance crews from driving on the paths. Graves stated he thought it was needed if the city would be using motorized vehicles to clean the area. He offered to prepare language for an amendment to the ordinance to allow maintenance work on the paths as discussion continued. Moore requested clarification of the ordinance and asked if the ordinance covered every road in the City of Kenai and all private property and parks in the City. Ross answered, the improved right-of-ways. Moore noted he had seen snow machines traveling down Forest Drive and asked if they were in violation. The answer was, the one side of Forest Drive was not improved (no bike paths) and so was allowable due to the right-of-way being wide. Most people's lawns along that side of the road reach into the right-of-way. Moore stated he didn't have a problem with the ordinance, but thought the discussion was focusing on the bike paths and there are infractions of the ordinance going on elsewhere in the city. Swarner asked Chief Morris if the Police Department was prepared to enforce the ordinance. Morris answered, the department was enforcing the ordinance as it was, but are not always successful in apprehending the offenders. They attend to violators of the ordinance as time allows -- based on priorities at the time and how often they are able to look for the violations. He added, they enforced the ordinance as it was and would continue to enforce it. Bannock referred to section (g) of the ordinance where it discussed the court offering a violator an option of performing community service in lieu of a fine or portion of a fine. He stated he understood the reasoning for the option, and asked if this portion of the code would be the only area where community service to fulfill a fine would be offered. Williams stated one consideration for this option for this particular violation was because most offenders would probably be young people who would not have'the $100 for the fine, but would better understand civic responsibility if given community service to repair damages. Bannock stated he had a problem with section (g) if it would only be used for this one part of the code. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 8 MOTION: Councilman Bannock MOVED to strike Section (g) from the ordinance and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: Measles: Yes Williams: No Moore: No MOTION FAILED. Bannock: Yes Bookey: Yes Smalley: No Swarner: No Graves offered a proposed amendment to allow motorized maintenance equipment on the paths: (k) Not withstanding the provisions of this section, the City or State may operate machinery or off -road vehicles in otherwise prohibited areas for maintenance, repair, cleaning and upkeep. Ross suggested adding, "...or their agents" after city or state. MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED to amend the ordinance as stated by Attorney Graves and with the suggestion of City Manager Ross. Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. Councilwoman Swarner requested UNANIMOUS CONSENT. Smalley asked what would happen if damage was done by a agency of the city or state which was hired to do maintenance. Graves answered it would be done administratively in the maintenance agreement with the agency. VOTE: There were no objections to the amendment. SO ORDERED. Williams asked the students attending the meeting of their reaction to the ordinance. Stacey Brewer asked if the ordinance was saying they would be ticketed if they used snow machines on trails around town. Brewer added, if snow machines couldn't be driven on the road, where else would they be allowed to be used. Williams. answered, council had discussed the matter. Snow machine users often use private property. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 9 Bannock noted that Section (a) spoke to that ("on public or private property without the express or implied consent of the owner, his authorized agent, or representative...") and added, according to Section (a) there was nowhere in Kenai snow machines could be driven. He asked if there would be implied consent and would the officers believe the driver if there was. Ross answered, the ordinance referred to bike paths or improved right-of-ways. He added, the city could not prohibit use on an unimproved right-of-way, but an off -road vehicle could not be used on the Spur Highway as a means of transportation. It was a State law. Bannock asked if it was a state law and was within the city's political subdivision, did the city have to do it also? Ross answered, that was why the ordinance was written as it was, as it was an improved right-of-way. Bannock asked if it would then fail under implied consent and Ross answered yes. Williams asked if council agreed the ordinance was produced to protect the roadway which would improve the quality of the area. VOTE ON MAIN AMENDED MOTION: Measles: Yes Bannock: Yes Smalley: Yes Williams: Yes Bookey: Yes Swarner: Yes Moore: Yes MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C-3. Ordinance No. 1721-96 - Amending the Kenai Municipal Code by Amending KMC 23.25.060(e) to Bring It In Conformity With AS 23.05.080 Regarding Employer Record Keeping of Hours Worked by Exempt Employees. MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED for adoption of Ordinance No. 1721-96 and Councilman Measles SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: Measles: Yes Bannock: Yes Smalley: Yes Williams: Yes Bookey: Yes Swarner: Yes Moore: Yes MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 10 C-4. Resolution No. 96-79 - Declaring the 1984 Chevrolet Wheeled Coach Ambulance Surplus and Donating it to the community of Ninilchik. MOTION: Councilman Bookey MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 96-79 and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion and requested UNANIMOUS CONSENT. There were no public comments. Councilman Moore asked if the city could give the ambulance away since it was purchased with state grant funds. Ross answered, the Southern EMS gave its permission for the city to donate the ambulance to Nilnilchik. VOTE: There were no objections. 80 ORDERED. C-5. Resolution No. 96-80 - Declaring the 1972 Mack Fire Engine Surplus and Donating It to the Mining & Petroleum Training Service. MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED for the adoption of Resolution No. 96-80 and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. Councilman Measles requested UNANII+MOUS CONSENT. There were no public comments. Councilman Bookey asked when MAPTS had taken possession of the fire truck and would the city continue to maintain the truck. Ross answered, the city had been storing the truck, and MAPTS had been using it for about two years. The resolution would clarify the paperwork and transfer the title. VOTE: There were no objections. 80 ORDERED. C-6. Resolution No. 96-81 - Awarding a Contract to Randy's Glass, Inc. for the Project Entitled, "Warm Storage #1 Overhead Door Replacement," for the Total Amount of $14,015.40. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 11 MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 96-81 and Councilman Bannock SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: Councilman Measles requested UNANIMOUS CONSENT. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. C-7. Resolution No. 96-82 - Transferring $2,300 in the General Fund For Alaska Municipal League Annual Dues. MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED for approval of Resolution NO. 96-82 and Councilman Bannock SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. C-8. Resolution No. 96-83 - Awarding the Bid for a "Hopper Type Material Spreader" to Sahlberg Equipment Company, Inc. for the Total Amount of $9,527.00. MOTION: Councilman Bookey MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 96-83 and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. There were no public comments. Kornelis explained the sander would be placed on the autocar and the autocar sander would be placed on the dump truck. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. BREAK TAKEN: 8:08 P.M. BACK TO ORDER: 8:26 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 12 (During this part of the meeting there was trouble with feedback with the microphones. Sound on the tapes of the remaining meeting was rendered inaudible. ITEM D: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS D-1. Council on Aging Councilwoman Swarner reported there were 80 applicants on the waiting list for congregate housing. Williams reported he spoke with Mr. Grasso about the proposed assisted living complex and he was told HUD continued to deny a guarantee certificate. He has received one offer to fund the construction of the complex from a private investor and he hopes to receive additional investors. They still hope to begin construction in the spring. D-2. Airport Commission Councilman Measles reported the commission met on October 10 and the minutes of the meeting were included in the packet. Williams noted from the minutes, there was discussion about what to do with the empty rental car space in the terminal. He remembered council had discussed this when the previous renter vacated and council decided to leave it empty. Williams asked if council wanted to continue to leave it empty or put out a bid. Bannock stated he didn't know if it would be in the best interest of the city to advertise for another car rental agency or any other agency. Williams stated, because the space was designed for a specific business, he didn't think it would be advertised for anything but a car rental agency. Bannock questioned why they would have to be specific. Bannock questioned the renting of the restaurant for only $500 a month as he thought it would serve the city better to close it and offer to empty car rental space for an area to sell coffee. He added, he felt it a waste of money to have the restaurant open for such a small rental amount. The city, in effect, was subsidizing the lessee of the restaurant for $500, but the city couldn't sell coffee. Smalley explained one reason for maintaining the restaurant was because the council felt it was the city's obligation to the KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 13 traveling public. Bannock noted the restaurant is closed at 5:00 p.m. and was not meeting the needs of the traveling public. Williams explained he was a proponent of having the restaurant open, even at no cost as the revenue gained from its rent was not the city's first source of concern. The first concern is the traveling public. He added, the lessee is aware of when he receives the most traffic and is open during those times. There are days he does not make more than $150.00. The council decided to keep the restaurant and bar open because they felt they should be kept open. The rents were lowered and the original bar lessee still moved out because he was not making a profit. Measles explained he was also a proponent of keeping the restaurant open for the traveling public. He added, the restaurant was open from 5:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. When it was open in the evenings, there was no business. He added, he still believed the restaurant should remain open. Discussion followed as to the possibility of doing a marketing/traffic study to see if an additional carrier could be enticed to moving into the airport. A carrier for travel to Seattle with both morning and evening flights. Williams suggested the Airport Commission do a marketing study in order to have the information to approach the airlines. Smalley stated he thought it a good idea, but knew it would cost the city money for security and gates, unless it was the responsibility of the airline. Williams suggested the Commission review the old passenger study to see if they were approaching the time to enlarge the facility. He added, he thought Alaska Airlines might be best to contact for passenger counts due to their connection with ERA. William suggested again the Airport Commission investigate the possibility and also review the passenger security requirements. Measles stated he didn't think the security area would have to be real big as it would be a pick up and drop off situation, although it would have to be able to accommodate full planes in case of bad weather needs. Bookey agreed he thought it a good idea to explore and added, if the ARFF and Challenger Center become realized, along with the addition'of tourists flying into the area, it was time the matter was reviewed. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 14 Measles noted, he would prefer the flight be direct to Seattle and not through Kodiak, etc. Williams added, if the study showed there was passenger, an aggressive company would want to come in. Measles stated he would take the discussion to the Airport Commission. D-3. Harbor Commission Bookey reported the Commission met on October 7. The minutes of the meeting would be included in the next packet. Bookey stated, the Commission discussed the Kenai Dunes project and they also passed a motion and recommended council look into the enhancement project for the south side of the river. The Commission also requested to cancel their next scheduled meeting of November 11 as it was a holiday. Council had no objections. D-4. Library Commission Councilman Moore reported the Commission would meet again on November 5. The last meeting minutes were included in the packet. He noted an application for student representative from Elissa Fahnholz was included in the packet. There were no objections from council for the appointment of Fahnholz to the Commission as student representative. Moore also noted the thank you letter from the Commission to the Council which was included in the packet. Williams suggested council schedule a work session in the future to discuss future plans in regard to the library needs. Council agreed a joint work session with the Library Commission would be scheduled after the first of year. D-5. Parks & Recreation Commission Councilman Smalley reported he attended the meeting for Councilman Bannock and the minutes of the meeting were included in the packet. Smalley reported Helen Brown, Gallery Coordinator of the Kenai Art Guild gave a presentation of banner designs to the Commission. Brown, who was attending the council meeting, was introduced to council and she presented the banner designs to council. Brown explained the Beautification Committee had asked them for banner designs and she suggested the banners be made by the Art Guild members. She added, the criteria for the designs were that the artist had to be an Art Guild member. She explained to KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 15 council that she had been testing the dyes and fabric, through many washings, under heat lamps, hanging them in the wind, etc. She added, the Art Guild could produce the banners at about one- half the cost of purchasing the banners from a banner company. The funds they would receive for the making of the banners would be used for roof repairs, etc. to their building. She also suggested the production of banners could be a yearly event and community members could be involved with the designs and construction of them. Samples of banners, fabric, and designs were reviewed by council. Councilman Smalley asked what would happen if the banners faded. Brown answered, they could be re -painted. Swarner referred to the minutes of the Beautification Committee meeting and the draft proposal which was presented to the Committee from Helen Brown. Smalley noted there was no money budgeted for banners in the present budget. Parks & Recreation would like to see a yearly project of 25-30 banners a year construction and the banners could then be changed or replaced when needed. He added, he believed it to be a worthwhile project and would support it. Marilyn Dimmick - Dimmick stated she was a member of the Beautification Committee and the project would be truly worthwhile. She added, the Beautification Committee had discussed the project during two or three meetings. The Committee felt the project was worthy of council's support. Parks & Recreation Director Frates reported the cost per banner would be $100. There would also be a one-time $25 design fee for each design used. He added, he was very excited about the project. The banners would be local designs, from community members, school children, etc. The banners would have a three- year warranty. When they required repair, it could be done locally. If they faded, the Guild could repaint them. Brown suggested the banners could be sponsored by community businesses as well. Rebecca Godek - Reported her business, Corporate Express, would be willing to sponsor banners. Williams suggested funding be appropriated in order to proceed with the project and request ten designs. It would be up to the Beautification Committee to choose the designs. Frates stated the original figure was to purchase 30 banners with all different KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 16 designs for the amount of $3,750. This would pay for the banners at $100 each and 30 designs at $25.00 each. The designs could then be used as often as the city would want to after that at no additional cost. Administration was requested to prepare an ordinance to appropriate funds to purchase the banners. Williams referred to the past discussion he had with council in regard to the suggested placing of a drinking fountain at Memorial Park in memory of Loretta Breeden. He corrected the cost given before and stated it would cost approximately $1,600 (a two-tier handicap -accessible fountain like that placed at the softball fields). Williams asked if the city crews could put the fountain in. Kornelis answered, he thought it could be however he was unsure if the fountain would have to drain into the sewer line. Administration was asked to check into the requirements for the fountain. Smalley continued his report of the Commission meeting. He stated the Commission discussed the Bernie Huss Trail. Commissioner Castimore was checking with Anchorage in regard to cemeteries, etc. and they talked about cutting the greenstrip grass in front of the schools. Frates explained he had a number of phone calls from people asking who would be cutting the grass which had been planted along the highway. Frates suggested the city could cut it once or twice a month or they could try to get businesses or churches to adopt portions of the highway and they could cut the grass. Smalley asked if there would be a problem having the city mow the grass on the state right-of-way. Kornelis stated he had not talked with the state about mowing the grass along the highway, but he had talked with them about the grass along the bike paths. The state had no problem with the city cutting the grass there. Smalley continued, the Commission also discussed use of the outdoor skating rink at the Sears Elementary School. Because there was no access to that rink, the Commission discussed berming up an area of city property and putting ice on that dirt. Smalley added, it was suggested to Frates that he travel to Anchorage and discuss with their Parks & Recreation Department, activities, etc. they are offering the community. It was also KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 17 reported there were no bids returned in regard to the RFP for an aerobics instructor at the Center and Terry Bookey was hired as the grounds keeper. D-6. Planning & Zoning Commission Councilman Smalley reported a copy of the meeting minutes were included in the packet. He added, a variance for placement of a garage was denied and the matter was being appealed. Also, a Home Occupation permit was approved in the Rogers Road area. Swarner asked if the applicant's neighbors were notified of the permit application. Smalley answered no, the code did not require it. Swarner requested the code be changed to require notification to the neighbors. Smalley stated he would discuss her request with the Commission. Smalley referred to the memorandum included in the packet which requested the Planning & Zoning Commission meetings scheduled for November 27 and December 25 be cancelled. There were no objections from council. Smalley noted the November 13 Commission meeting would be held in the Library Conference Room. D-7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees D-7a. Beautification Committee Swarner reported the minutes of the meeting were included in the packet. Swarner noted two members of the Committee were in the audience and asked for their comments. Barbara Nord thanked council for their consideration of purchase of the banners as it had been a pet project of hers since being on the Committee. Swarner also reported that 14 park benches were donated to the city by the Kenai Care Center and would be installed in the spring. Marilyn Dimmick reported the Care Center youth received a one- time grant for a business and they built the benches. She added, they felt it was appropriate to donate the benches to the city in order to give back to the community. The kids did the work in cooperation with the Parks & Recreation Department. It was a very worthwhile project for the youth and they were enthusiastic and enjoyed contributing to the community. Williams reported he was forwarded a copy of a proclamation from the State Senate which recognized the efforts of the Kenai Care Center. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 18 D-7b. Historic District Board Councilman Moore reported the next meeting was scheduled for October 22. D-7c. Challenger Steering Committee Councilman Bannock reported the October 10 meeting had been cancelled. Williams reported the Steering Committee made a presentation to the Alaska Aerospace Board of Directors. Since the presentation, the Board offered a grant of $7,500. There would be grants offered for the next three years if federal monies are received. Williams added, the Board thought it an excellent idea to have the Governor fly to Seattle and attend a Challenger Center in order that he understands what the program entails. D-7d. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board Kim Booth - Executive Director of the KVCC reported the Board held a meeting on October 11. Their fund raising budget was lower than anticipated and they were now trying to refine it and hope to bring it back up. Booth added, a report was being developed to include visitor/use statistics for the last four years and she would have it available for placement in the next council packets. Booth also reported Helen Brown spoke to the Board in regard to the banner program and they were extremely supportive of the project. They were hoping some designs could be developed to place on their three parking lot light poles (two on a pole). Booth reported the Board was accepting nominations for two seats on the Board. She added, she was appointed as a marketing partner and was elected president of the Marking Council. Booth distributed the new Marketing Council's travel planner to council. ITEM E: MINUTES E-1. Regular Meeting of October 2, 1996. Approved by consent agenda. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 19 ITEM F: CORRESPONDENCE None. ITEM G: OLD BUSINESS Discussion - Kenai River Restoration and Recreation Enhancement Project - South Side of River Mouth. City Engineer La Shot reminded council that the city had been approached by Fish & Game to submit a grant application for development of an access to the beach on the south side of the river. Council had requested administration to review the information and make a presentation at this meeting. La Shot reported there were two access points now used along the section line easements to access the beach. Council was aware of problems that exist (trespassing of private property and littering) from use of those easements through discussions with property owners in the area. Administration reviewed other possibilities for access and he discussed them with council. La Shot reviewed suggestions made that would extend existing roads through wetlands to the beach. One alternative was to extend Royal Street north and west, traveling around private property: The other alternative was to travel down Inlet Salmon Drive and go northwest to the beach. He added, if users of the beach traveled on city property to the beach, there wouldn't be the trespass problems that now exist. They also discussed costs of improving the beach route, but didn't see how a year -around road could be developed unless it was placed above the dune line. At this time there was no parking at the access of the mouth or above the dune line. La Shot noted there was a piece of private property at the end of the spit which would have to be avoided. La Shot added, he thought one of the critical elements would be to get permits to fill the wetlands. Bookey asked if there was a cost limit in the grant, allowing funding to whatever level the city chooses on the project. La Shot answered he didn't think there was a limit, but it would be good to be cost cautious. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 20 Williams asked if La Shot had a cost estimate to extend Inlet Salmon, going around the private property. La Shot answered, he didn't do a cost estimate for that, but to improve the beach route on top of the dunes was estimated at $150,000 and $390,000 per acre. Williams stated he thought it would be a good time to submit a grant application now. Bookey agreed because the project was brought to the city from Fish & Game. Kornelis added, they did approach the city, but he didn't think they meant to go all the way to the mouth. Williams proposed the city do a cost estimate for a road extending Inlet Salmon and the city purchase the ten acres of private property. Ross stated administration would prepare the grant documents and include a high estimate (due to the short preparation time) for the extension of Inlet Salmon and development of a parking lot. Ross asked if the design for the dirt work etc. could be done in-house. La Shot answered, it could be. Bookey clarified the extension of the road would cross wetlands. He was told it would. Bookey asked what would happen if a Corps permit could not be acquired. Ross answered, they would submit the grant application with a high estimate. This would be a preliminary submittal and if they get a go ahead, they would then pressure the Corps. Williams added, the key was to take pressure off the Kenai River to preserve the habitat and fishery. Swarner asked if the city had heard from the Duthweilers. Answer was no. It was suggested letters of support be requested from Duthweilers, the Borough, and anyone else who had come to the city in regard to the trespass issue. Bookey clarified, administration was proposing to extend Inlet Salmon and use it for public access to the beach. Answer was yes. Bookey and Swarner agreed they would rather use the city property and not purchase any private property. La Shot added, the application needed to be submitted by October 31. Mary Ellen Perrizo - Perrizo stated she lives at 2290 Royal, just off Cannery Road. Perrizo added, extending Inlet Salmon would favorably impact her property. If there was a road leading to the beach to facilitate dip netters, and if there was a parking lot with toilet facilities, it would enhance the area. Pursuing the grant would allow safer access for trash retrieval, space for bathroom facilities and timely response by emergency vehicles. She added, she thought it would be critically important for the use of the river. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 21 Perrizo added, council had proceeded with a plan for improvements to the north side of the river, and felt improvement to the south side was also required. She offered to write a letter of support to include with the grant application, and offered to speak with her neighbors. Williams asked if she would act as a liaison with her neighbors for the city in getting letters of support. She stated she would be happy to do so. ITEM H: NEW BUSINESS H-1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED to pay the bills. There were no objections. 80 ORDERED. H-2. Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED to pay the purchase orders over $2,500 and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. 80 ORDERED. H-3. Ordinance No. 1723-96 - Approving and Adopting the Revised Comprehensive Plan for the City of Kenai and Recommending Adoption by the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Introduced by consent agenda. H-4. Ordinance No. 1724-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $24,000 in the General Fund for Lobbyist. Introduced by consent agenda. H-5. Discussion - Assignment of Council Liaison Positions to Commissions, Committees and Boards. Williams requested comments from council. Swarner suggested changes be made with the assignment of liaisons as it was a learning experience in regard to what other commissions and committees were involved with and what else was going on in the city. Councilmembers have been going to the same meetings for a long time and she thought it time for a change. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 22 The list was corrected by inserting Councilman Moore as the liaison to the Historic District Board. Swarner asked if any decision had been made as to the city's representative to the Kenai Chamber of Commerce Board. She stated she thought the representative should be the city manager. Ross stated he thought council should wait until the Chamber had time to research their by-laws. Bookey stated he thought the city should have some participation. Ross added, he suggested the Chamber change their by-laws to state the council would appoint their representative. A discussion followed in which Williams stated his concerns that the Chamber seemed to be deciding who should be the city's representative to their Board and that the former city manager had been appointed to the Chamber Board. Measles explained, the city had always had that prerogative and the former city manager had been appointed to the board, but not as a representative of the city. Smalley called to move the agenda. There were no changes made to the council liaison assignments. Council also reviewed the memorandum included in the packet requesting the rescheduling of the Historic District Board monthly meeting to the third Monday at 5:30 p.m. Council suggested the meeting begin at 6:00 p.m., which would allow the liaison to attend in a timely manner and to better allow for public participation. Rebecca Godek stated she was a member of the Board and they requested it be set at 5:30 p.m. because they felt it would be more convenient for the members to attend. She added, if there was an item on the agenda of public concern, she was sure the public would attend although there had never been public participation at any of their meetings. Bannock agreed with her statement regarding lack of public participation and suggested council agree to the 5:30 p.m. meeting time. If, after a year, there were still problems with Board attendance, council could then take drastic action. Council agreed and had no objections to scheduling Historic District Board meetings for the third Monday of the month, beginning at 5:30 p.m. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 23 H-6. Schedule Board of Adjustment Hearing Date - Appeal of Delmar Sanders. Clerk Freas explained she had received a letter from Mr. Sanders appealing the Planning & Zoning Commission's actions on a request for a variance permit. Mr. Sanders had informed her he would be leaving the state on a previously scheduled vacation on November 9. Council set the Board of Adjustment hearing for the Sanders appeal for November 6 at 7:00 p.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION - City Clerk Evaluation MOTION: Councilman Smalley MOVED that the city council of the City of Kenai meet in executive session to discuss a matter which deals with personnel and also had a financial impact on the matters of the City and asked Clerk Freas to be in attendance. Councilwoman Swarner SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. EXECUTIVE SESSION BEGAN: 10:13 P.M. BACK TO ORDER: 11:12 P.M. Councilman Measles reported the purpose of the executive session was to conduct the annual evaluation of the Clerk. The Clerk received a good evaluation from all the councilmembers and the recommendation of the council was to raise the Clerk's salary to $52,000 a year. This was done in consideration that Clerk Freas had been with the city and never had a salary adjustment except for cost -of -living raises, since coming to work as the Clerk. MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED for the salary year) be -retroactive to the first of the Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. objections. 80 ORDERED. ITEM I: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS I-1. Mayor adjustment (to $52,000 a fiscal year. There were no a. Health Center - Williams explained he would need approximately 40 extra copies of the Health Center Relocation Report and requested council approval for the cost of those KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 24 copies of approximately $400. Costs would include the copying of the report, with color pictures. There would be approximately five copies to be kept at City Hall for future reference. The remainder would be distributed to state officials, legislators, etc. b. CIRCAC - Williams, referring to the information in the packet, reported he spoke with John Douglas in regard to his being reappointed as the city's representative on the CIRCAC. Mr. Douglas stated he would like to continue to serve and would be pleased to be reappointed. Council had no objections to have John Douglas' term continue on the Board. C. City Population - Williams reported he would be sending a letter to the State protesting their count of the city's population. I-2. City Manager a. Bike Path Snow Removal - Ross reported he had some discussion with city employees in regard to council's request to investigate whether the snow could be removed from the bike paths. There was concern the truck and plow couldn't be used because of the contours of the path and because it was doubtful if the asphalt would support the weight of the vehicles. He added, the Parks & Recreation Department would be grooming trails for cross-country skiing, using the bike path. Because of the concerns stated, this year they would proceed with the grooming concept and not plow. b. Vintage Pointe Windows - Ross reported there had been some problems with windows at Vintage Pointe. Some structural work would be done to correct the problem and would hopefully resolve the ASHA problem also. C. Dip Net Cost Summary - Ross reported he received information from the city departments and it showed there was approximately $10,000 in added costs to the city attributed to dipnetting. The highest cost was to the Kenai Police Department at $4,000. On the other hand, there was approximately $16,000 in revenues received from boat launch fees. d. Roof Leak/KVCC — Ross reported there was a roof leak at the Center. The leak was in a valley of the roof. It was KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 25 repaired (under warranty). The builder and city administration agree that because of the design of the roof, the problem would not go away. e. Bluff Restoration - Ross reported the city was aware of the problem and they were working with agencies, etc. in regard to it. f. . INTERspace/Airport Advertising - Ross reported he found the agreement with INTERspace had not been signed and in looking into the contract, found it to be for ten years, which is not allowed by FAA without a waiver. INTERspace was aware of the problem. Administration discussed the matter with FAA in Anchorage, who sent the matter on to FAA in Washington, DC. They were trying to get a waiver. Ross added, he wanted council to be aware of the problem now instead of them finding out later in the year. He added, INTERspace was given a go-ahead with the contract and they are performing under the contract. g. City Manager Search - Ross referred to the draft letter to applicants which council discussed at their work session at the beginning of the week. Ross explained, he incorporated the essay questions, etc. which council discussed during the work session and requested their review and approval of the letter. Council had no objections to the letter. Williams, referring back to the INTERspace discussion, asked what would happen if INTERspace would pull out as he did not think they were doing a very good job. Ross stated, INTERspace had been selling advertisements, however, the rates were higher than businesses in the area have been used to, but they were performing. Measles added, some of the signs were to be placed in November. Bookey asked what would happen if the city didn't receive a waiver. Ross answered, it would mean they would have to negotiate with INTERspace, however he anticipated the city would prevail in acquiring the waiver. Councilman Moore, referring to the bluff restoration report, asked what actually happened and if it was the material or equipment that caused the bluff to collapse. Ross answered, it was probably a combination of the way the material had been placed and working the equipment across the bluff probably helped KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 26 the collapse as well. The equipment had to be situated in a precarious position to place the fill. Those were issues that were being reviewed. Williams asked if the material would have to be removed. Ross answered, they did not think that was a viable alternate. They would be working with four or five agencies in regard to that and it was the position of the city that was not a viable alternative. That would only make the situation worse. The City would do everything it can to show that the material is not a hazard. The asphalt used was very old and well seasoned and had been stacked in piles. Moore asked if there was a permit allowing the use of the asphalt. Ross answered, the drawings from FEMA and the Corps of Engineers showed the use of concrete or asphalt when filling. However, the regulations prohibited use of asphalt in that type of application. Until they work further with the agencies, they wouldn't be able to tell much else. Williams stated he talked with Bill Nelson about a containment device for the bluff. Sometime ago he had asked Nelson to proceed with looking into grants in that regard and Nelson had admitted he had not done the investigation, but planned on doing it soon. Williams added, one solution would be to drive pile beams into the ground and create a wall (approximately 15-201 high) and use rough cut spruce logs and place them down between the I beams, etc. It would make a strong wall. He added, he would like to ask Nelson to proceed with investigating grant funding. Williams also discussed the possibility of using railroad ties which had been removed from the tracks by Alaska Railroad and were available. Ross reported the city had removed asphalt above the high mean and what was left was at the toe of the slough and two -three feet became uncovered during a high tide. Moore noted, at this time next year, that would be at the bottom of the bluff. Ross stated, to send equipment in to remove the asphalt would be hazardous to the people running the equipment and would make the situation worse. I-3. Attorney Attorney Graves reported he would attend a statewide Kenai River Working Group meeting in Anchorage on Thursday. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 27 I-4. city clerk a. Telephone Poll - Clerk Freas read into the record, actions from a telephone poll taken on October 10, 1996. The poll was authorized by City Manager Rick Ross, signed by Robin Feltman, Acting Finance Director, attested by Clerk Freas, and taken by Kathy Woodford. The poll was: The Public Works Department is requesting Council approval for a purchase order to Zubeck, Inc. for five days work on the Mission Street Bluff stabilization project. The total cost was $6,050.00, which included the mobilization and demobilization costs. The cost would be reimbursed by FEMA through the Alaska Division of Emergency Services. It was part of the emergency funds for the Kenai River flood damage. Vote: Williams: Yes Measles: Out of Town Bookey: Yes Smalley: Yes Swarner: Yes Bannock: Yes Moore: Yes b. Holiday Party - Freas requested council to set the holiday party date. Following council's direction in the past, she informed council the Senior Center was available on January 4, 11 and 25. Council scheduled the Holiday Party for January 11. I-5. Finance Director No report. Williams requested Acting Finance Director Feltman to prepare a list of all the expenditures approved by council, over and above those included in the budget, out of the General Fund since the adoption of the budget and what would be needed to balance the budget. Williams requested the information be included in the next packet. Public Works Director Public Works Director Kornelis reported: KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 28 a. A preconstruction conference would be held on the dunes project in the morning. b. The wellhouse building was closed in and is proceeding. C. Information Item 4: Kornelis referred to his letter to Foster Construction requesting a stronger fence be placed around the dirt pile along the highway. d. Information Item 6: Kornelis referred to his memorandum regarding DOT's Forest Drive/Redoubt Avenue improvement project. Kornelis added, DOT was at the stage of selecting a consultant. Swarner asked Kornelis if any of the city streets had been plowed twice as'there was a pile of snow between her and her neighbor's driveway. Kornelis answered, he didn't know as he had been out- of-town. Moore, referring to Information Item No. 6, asked if it was normal to start a construction job in October. Kornelis answered, he had questioned that too. He added, it could be utility relocation, bid opening, or ordering equipment. Kornelis also reported when he spoke with DOT, he told them the city wanted storm drainage along the street, etc. He thought it optimistic for them to get the job done in one year. Moore also reported the street light at the corner of Forest and Redoubt was broken. Kornelis stated he would have it reported to HEA. Williams suggested a press release should be published based on the information Kornelis had received from DOT. It was suggested Kornelis get the information in writing from DOT prior to publishing a press release. Swarner asked if the Bridge Access Road was on the DOT's list for lighting -and widening. Kornelis answered he did not know. I-7. Airport Manager Acting Airport Manager Keith Holland referred to the earlier discussion in regard to the airport restaurant and a short discussion followed in regard to the restrictions of the airport. Councilman Bannock stated the city was subsidizing a losing situation and that was unfair. He suggested another scenario would be that when the next time the RFP went out for the restaurant, an investor submit a proposal offering a higher amount, then sell only coffee. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 29 Williams referred to Information Item No. 3 which was a memorandum from Bob Frates, Parks & Recreation Director. The memorandum reported there were eight street light poles in front of Carrs that would be removed in February. Therefore, there wouldn't be any Christmas pole decorations along that part of the highway. Williams stated his concern there would be no lights along the highway in front of the store. Frates clarified his memorandum by stating he was talking about the lights in front of the Old Carrs Mall. Smalley asked Kornelis if a cost estimate was done in regard to paving an extended path from Lawton extended to Thompson Park. Kornelis answered no, but he suggested it to DOT and they were very receptive to it to make it into a bike path instead of putting one along the highway. ITEM J: DISCUSSION J-1. Citizens Bob Peters - a. Stated he appreciated the Clerk's efforts and added she was very easy to work with. b. Stated it had been rumored that there would be $120,000 for the project for the repairs. Kornelis stated he didn't know where that figure came from. He had not heard that figure. Kornelis continued, FEMA had asked if there was flood damage. He told them there had been drain damage, etc. but he had not heard the $120,000 figure. Peters stated he appreciated whatever work had been done as he had been fearful nothing would be done. He added, he was encouraged by the mayor's remarks that something should be done. Peters added, he thought the placing of concrete in culverts at Prudhoe Bay had been successful and was glad to think the City was looking toward that direction. He asked if Mr. Nelson was the only engineering company in the area that would have ideas of how to restore the bluff. Williams answered the City had a lot of people look at the problem and some gave suggestions. He added, the thought any good engineer would be able to understand the dynamics of the project. Peters stated he thought someone else might have a different approach. Williams answered, the costs seem to inflate the when not using local engineering firms and was one reason why Nelson has been used on the project. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1996 PAGE 30 J-2. Council Council had no reports. Smalley thanked Ross for keeping council informed and calling council when issues arose. ITEM R: ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:55 p.m. Minutes transcribed and submitted by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL PRESENT: Williams, Measles, Moore, Bookey, Bannock, Swarner and Smalley. STAFF PRESENT: Freas, Graves, Ross, Kornelis. Others present: Larry Simmens, Dori Lynn Anderson (Clarion) ARFF PROJECT: The work session started at approximately 7:02 p.m. Mayor Williams introduced representatives of Morrison Maierle (Helena, MT) and Symtron and asked them to give a short report as to the progress of the Aircraft Recovery Fire Fighting School. Tim Orthmeyer reported they had met with city staff and went over the major phases of the project and direction was given in regard to the preliminary scope of the project. They hope to have the preliminary design completed by the end of November and the major elements of the project identified, i.e. what the parts of the building will be, the function they will serve, where the site will be and a preliminary cost estimate. They will then start the process of the propane vendor selection (equipment manufacturer and supplier). They will be advertising the bid in November and have the bid opening in December. There is one firm eminently qualified but others in the field. Mr. Haymond (Symtron) reported Symtron had been involved with the building of all 12 ARFFs in the United States. Mr. Haymond gave some background information about Symtron. They have many patents and are primarily training (pilots, submarines, fire fighters, etc.) He also reported this site would be reviewed for international use because FAA is looking toward the Far and Near East, Russia, etc. where US planes land as there is more emphasis on those countries following the same rules as US airports follow. The Far East is very interested and he believes there is a strong market for people from Japan and Korea to come to Kenai to use the school. There will be economic gains for Kenai through hotel/motel, restaurants, etc. Mr. Orthmeyer also reported it would take two years to construct the school. The underground, structures, etc. would be built during the first year and placement of the equipment the second. They are working with two local firms: Kluge & Associates will supply the architectural services for the building and Wm. Nelson & Associates who will provide some of the utility and roadway design into the site, sewer plant requirements, etc. It is an $8 million contract. KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 2 Councilman Moore asked what type of support services would their firm provide after completion. Mr. Haymond answered their firm would hire a local person to be the superintendent of the project and who would monitor the project during the whole construction. The systems are bit tested (they may be tested via phone line). The superintendent will have a lengthy training session. They generally have a 24-hour policy for parts. If problems come up, they are handled quickly. CITY MANAGER SEARCH: City Manager Ross reviewed information included in the packet with council. The information included a schedule for city manager selection, process of review of resumes and a draft letter requesting additional information from the applicants. Ross asked if the calendar was acceptable to council. Smalley answered he liked it and Swarner noted she liked the idea of the applicant submitting newspaper articles and editorials. Ross noted the schedule would commit council's time. He explained the proposed process would have the applications reviewed to see if they meet the minimum requirements; those meeting the minimum requirements would immediately be sent the letter requesting additional information; those that do not meet the minimum requirements would be held for council review (on a bi-weekly or weekly basis) and consideration. Those that do not meet minimum requirements, but that council wishes to consider further, would also be sent the letter requesting additional information. Swarner stated during the last search, they did not visit the communities of the finalists but felt that was something needing to be done this time. Williams stated he hoped that they would find someone from Alaska and travel outside would not be necessary. Bookey stated if the applicant is from Alaska, a visit would be easily handled. Also, if it is someone from the state, council may know the person or the community from which they come. He added, he was not comfortable with sending someone to visit a community of an applicant as he didn't think someone could be there long enough to get to know the area, etc. Williams suggested someone could travel to the community where the person worked prior to their present job and could probably learn a lot more about the applicant. Bookey stated he thought the calendar was a good one to work within. If, by January or February, council had not yet made a choice, they could take longer. KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 3 Council discussed whether prior experience as a city manager would be required. Williams he was not locked into having to hire someone with city manager experience. Smalley stated he thought there were other aspects of experience that could take the place of city manager experience, i.e. effectiveness with legislature, ports and harbors, airports, etc. Swarner stated she would be looking for a strong manager and would prefer a former city manager because that person would know more of how a municipality functions. Williams asked if council wanted to use the same point system as they used in the previous search. Swarner stated she had a real problem with the Alaska residency as she thought some applicants had received more points for living in Alaska. Smalley stated he didn't have a problem with giving points for Alaska residency as he didn't think those five points were that crucial. Swarner stated she felt some of the applicants may have been more qualified and were not included in the finalists because of not having those points. Williams stated he would be more biased toward Alaska residents. Moore suggested that since most of the council was involved with the last search they discuss mistakes they may have made during that process to help in working out the process for this search. Ross asked if council had objections to the calendar and the screening in and out of applications he proposed in the information presented to them. There were no objections. Bannock asked if the council's review of the applicants not meeting the minimum requirements would take place during a work session or council meeting. Measles suggested those applications should be placed in binders and council could review them on their own. If there are some that a councilmember feels should be reviewed closer, it could be tagged for additional review. Ross stated also that after the applicant receives the letter requesting additional information, some applicants may choose to drop out of the process. Ross added, two of the items requested (in the letter) would give a lead into the applicant's writing style. Williams asked why the essay question was included. Ross answered because some council's like to use them. Williams added, it still would not be known if the applicant would be the writer of the essay question answer. Ross noted, the essay question was a suggestion and it was up to council to determine whether one should be included in the letter. The other items would allow council some leads for investigation of backgrounds. KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OC 0BER 14, 1996 PAGE 4 Reauest for Additional Information Letter: Discussion followed regarding the letter which would be sent to applicants, meeting the minimum requirements, and requesting additional information. Paragraph #2 requested newspaper articles, editorials, etc. from past years. The amount of years was left blank for council to determine. Williams suggested the amount of years should be five. Bannock disagreed and suggested it should not be limited. He added, he felt more would be learned about the applicant if there was no number of years included. Also, if an applicant submitted very old articles, it would be up to council to sift out those persons as perhaps not being very active in recent years. Moore asked if they would be requesting employment history. Williams stated it would be included in the resumes. Williams suggested stating "significant newspaper articles." Williams added he agreed with Bannock that they could sift out the articles there were out of date, etc. Swarner stated she preferred leaving a number in the paragraph. Bookey and Williams stated they were not locked in to either. Bookey stated he would be okay with leaving the amount of years for articles open. Smalley added, council could always contact newspapers. Moore asked how much weight would be given to the newspaper articles. Ross answered, very little, but the articles would give leads for background checks, etc. Moore suggested asking for articles and editorials "from recent years." Council agreed. Williams referred to Paragraph 3 of the letter in which it suggested performance evaluations could be included and stated not a lot of credence should be given to performance evaluations. Swarner stated she liked the first sentence. Ross stated he had discussed the performance evaluations with City Attorney Graves. Graves had stated in some states performance evaluations are not public information. That was why the sentence said they "may be" submitted. It would be the applicant's choice to forward them. Smalley stated he had no objection to leaving the sentence as long as it was stated the choice (to include evaluations) was left to the applicant. Measles stated council would not be locking into anything on the first pass. Smalley asked how they would evaluate those applicants requesting their present employers not be contacted. Bookey stated he did not remember that being a big problem during the last search. Ross stated he wanted to make sure the letter was acceptable by council. Smalley questioned the essay question and if council wanted to include essay questions in the KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 5 letter. Smalley added, a lot could be found out about an individual through essay questions. Ross suggested a question could be, "Discuss your philosophy of the role of city manager and council in a council/manager form of government." Ross added, council would be evaluating the person on their ability to communicate, in writing and verbal (for finalists). Also, "What are the responsibilities of a city manager to the council and council to the manager." Ross added, the answers should be complete in two pages or less. Council agreed those questions should be included as essay questions. Ross stated the answer to the essay would give council a sense of where the applicant was in regard to working with a council and also how the applicant can communicate. Bookey asked if it was inappropriate to ask for handwritten answers. Council decided it would be inappropriate as most communication is now done through printed work. Ross suggested as council was developing criteria for the hire, they consider what made people unsuccessful as city managers in the past -- what were the failures, i.e. management style, fiscal controls, not keeping council informed of everyday actions, etc. Identification of those items may help them develop the criteria for this hire. Smalley stated he would like Ross' thoughts on an evaluation system and his ideas. Ross stated he would prepare one but wanted it clear the council had to choose its own criteria. He could set up a grid system for council to review and assign the points. Smalley stated that would be helpful to him. Ross added, he would then like council to call him with ideas and he would include them in the system. He suggested he would include that information with the next meeting's packet. Williams suggested "environmental controls, pollution controls, etc." be included with the criteria. Ross stated, the important question in regard to all the criteria that could be listed would be how the manager utilizes the resources available, not whether they know the DEC regulations, airport regulations, etc. Williams stated he didn't want to use a headhunter or have someone hired that would come in and get new staff. Ross noted, the Kenai Municipal Code would not allow that to happen. Moore suggested council review '"The One Minute Manager" for information in formulating criteria. Ross stated he had reviewed questions that had been asked during the last interviews and suggested this time they ask questions which would predict behavior for future performance. He added, when the interview time came, he would like to give council some ideas for questions to ask during the interview. Questions would be stated so KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 6 council could evaluate them on past performance. Ross offered as an example, "Describe the circumstances where you've dealt with a disruptive employee and how did you handle it?" Ross stated, when looking for future performance, using a behavioral - based interview is a better predictor. Point System: Williams asked if council wanted to discuss the point system. Smalley suggested they wait until Ross put together a grid system for their review. Swarner questioned how much management experience and education they would be requiring. Ross noted, that information was already in the advertisement. APPROVAL GIVEN: Council approved the following: 1. Schedule for City Manager Selection. 2. Process, including binders for council to review the applicants without the minimum requirements. 3. Letter: a. Paragraph No. 1 b. Paragraph No. 2 -- instead of amount of years, it should stated "from recent years." c. Paragraph No. 3 -- inclusion of performance evaluations should be the applicants' option. 4. Essay questions to ask: a. "Discuss your philosophy of the role of city manager and council in a council/manager form of government." b. "What are the responsibilities of a city manager to the council and council to the manager." Graves noted he had prepared a draft employment agreement which had been included in the October 16, 1996 council packet at Attorney's Report. It was asked if council wanted to have a work session to review the applications. Ross suggested no work session be scheduled until after January 8 as that was the deadline for applicants to forward the requested additional information. Council agreed. KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 7 Williams requested the applications be numbered. Ross stated he would have Kim Howard log them in, giving them a number and keep a master list with the number and name. Chances to Internal Procedures: Ross reported he was making a few changes in internal procedures due to a number of items which he felt had not been staffed properly. Those items included correspondence, which may have noted a copy to council, that went into the packet which he felt really did not require council's review. Because some items may require review or action by other departments prior to placement in the packet, he felt it necessary to have memoranda from staff addressed to him. After his review, he will forward the information to other departments, if necessary, discuss the matter with the department head, and decide whether it is something that requires council's attention. Ross added, he prefers not having to do substitute ordinances and resolutions as they are sometimes confusing. He wants to be able to forward information, ordinances, resolutions, etc. to council in a clear form which has been reviewed by other departments. A new city manger would be able to follow through with that as well. Ross noted two exceptions to this would be if the department head has a significant disagreement with his decision that the matter would not need to be forwarded to council or if the matter had to do with his (Ross') non-performance of his job. Ross added, he was not wanting to restrict information to council, but to attempt to get better staff work to council. Ross asked if council had any objections. Bookey stated he fully supported it as he thought there was a lot of materials included in the packet that were irrelevant and not requiring council review. There were no objections. Council decided another work session would be required, but would not set it until after the January 8, 1997 deadline for additional information from applicants. Ross added, he would forward the grid to council with their November 13 packet. Williams stated a work session would be scheduled at the November 13 meeting. KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT: The work session ended at approximately 8:30 p.m. Notes transcribed by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk PAYMENTS 2,5=0 WHICH NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL COUNCIL MEETING OF: PAGE ONE NOV. 8 1996 AMOUNT DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION FOR RATIFICATION: $39,498.05 VARIOUS UTILITIES HOMER ELEC ASSN INC ELECTRICAL USAGE WORKERS COMP. WORKERS COMP. $11,991.00 BROWN AGENCY WORKERS COMP RENEWAL VARIOUS LIABILITY $61,669.67 FEDERAL WITHHOLDINGS NBA VARIOUS LIABILITY $49,095.05 PIERS OCT.PER8 VARIOUS LIABILITY $14,290.00 ICMA OCTOBER 457 VARIOUS COMMUNICATIONS $3,547.77 PTl PHONE USAGE VARIOUS SUPPL. RETIREMENT $6,310.12 ICMA OCTOBER 401 VARIOUS LABILITY $3,925.00 NACOIPEB8CO OCTOBER 457 FOR APPROVAL: WATER SYS 1MPROV 96 CONSTRUCTION $165122.61 I�ao.00 OVERALL PENINSULA CONSTRUCTON T. PARK MPROV. WELL 03 OW TO �'fALL REPAIR AND MAIN. $8 037.50 ADONL to TAROe. _ 1R1-CITY'S CONSTRUCTION FILL PILINGS WITH CONCRETE DOCK OA014.00 OVERAGE DUE TO moc. SOILS CIWP REMEDATION $16 607.60 cwINGE oRpERe _ GEO ENGI FERS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES j129.00 OUE TO EaTMATE BEING SEWER REPAIR AND MAIN. $2 579.00 LOW. FOSTER CONSTRUCTION BRING 2 MANHOLES UP TO GRADE Effect Int INVESTMENTS CENTRAL TREAS. $26,649.84 VARIABLE KEYTRUST AML POOL INTEREST REINVEST. 911 CENTRAL TREAS. CENTRALTREAS, . $203 414.51 VARIABLE KEYTRUST ANIL INVESTMENT POOL 9130 CENTRAL TREAS. CENTRAL TREAS. CENTRAL TREAS. VARIABLE KEYTRUST AML POOL INTEREST REINVEST 10110 CENTRAL TREAS. CENTRAL TREAS. $35,26.56 235$29,926.53 VARIABLE KEYTRUST AML POOL INVESTMENT 10130 PURCHASE ORDERS OVER $2,500.00 WHICH NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL COUNCIL MEETING OF: unv a 409112 vFNnnR DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT AMOUNT WLN DIAL UP ACCESS STERCHI CONSTRUCTION FLUME BUILDING J&D PAINTING AND DRYWALL PAINT INTERIOR OF FSS (as required by lease) ASHLEY REED AND ASSOC. LOBBY SERV. FOR 96/97 LEG. SESSION LIBRARY COMMUNICATIONS $3,000.00 STP IMPROV Off BLDG. $4,000.00 A.P. LAND REPAIR AND MAIN. $5,775.00 LEGISLATIVE PROF. SERVICES $24,000.00 WHITE - VENDOR .GOLDENROD - ACCOUNTING :ANARY - ACCOUNTING 3LUE - SHIPPING & RECEIVING GREEN - APPROVED COPY SINK - REQUISITIONER F PURCHASE ORDER CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO STE. 200 PHONE 283-7538 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 VENDOR NO. 13820 TO Alaska Pump & Supply, Inc. Ordered by: Fred Macvie SHIP VIA: BY d-;, RELATING TO THIS �FUR. CHASE. No. Dwe 11/5/96 i PREPAY SHIPPING - CHARGE SEPARATE ON INVOICE FOB rl/V..� UR[t.l V1f PEROUOTATION PURCHASES AUTHORIZED ONLY WHEN SIGNED ABOVE BY THE FINANCE DIRECTOR OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENT ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OR ARTICLE DUANTITr ORDERED UNIT I UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Parts to repair wasting pump (pump is down Stator C310GQ Rotor C71FG1 744.39 Stator Gasket BH085Q 1939.18 13.46 TOTAL 2697.03 - ACCOUNT NUMBER A NT DEPARTMENT STP 010.67.2022 2697. D3 �I�j BY DEPARTMENT HEAD Suggested by: Parks & Rec Direuuut City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1725-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $3,750 IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE PURCHASE OF BANNERS. WHEREAS, it has been determined that new banners are needed for display in the City of Kenai; and WHEREAS, these items were not budgeted in the FY97 budget; and WHEREAS, money is available for appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BE INCREASED AS FOLLOWS: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Fund Balance $3,750 Increase Appropriations: Beautification - Small Tools & $3,750 Minor Equip. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 13th day of November, 1996. JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduction: 11/6/96 Adopted: 11/13/96 Effective: 11/13/96 Approved by Finance: 4-� Suggested by: Historic District Board CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1726 -96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE 14.20.220 TO ESTABLISH SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE TOWNSITE HISTORIC DISTRICT ZONE. WHEREAS, KMC :4.20.105 established the Townsite Historic District Zone (TSH) within the City of Kenai; and WHEREAS, KMC :4.20.105(k) currently allows signs in the TSH zone as are allowed in commerciai zones; and WHEREAS, special requirements for signs within the TSH zone need to be established to protect and further the objectives of the historic District Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAL, ALASKA THAT KMC 14.20.220 IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 14.20.Z?0 Signs and Advertising Devices: (f) Sim =nitted in the Townsite Historic District Zone: W Intent The imem of the Townsite Historic District zone si is to enhance vrotect and pr2= the distinctive historical character of Kenafs historic dist-ict it is intended that the signs express the special character of the district a SMIe which relates to the rremises and be of a size that is in scale with the buildine and streetscape as a whole. M Signs identifvine home occupation: One sign not exceeding four (41 s_ouare feet in area Such sign shall be no closer than ten (10) feet to any property line. No lighting_ is perautted. M Suns for nonconforming, permitted and conditional uses~ One son of thirty-two (32) sauare feet per free-standing building unless the sign is a wall si9Q in which case it shall not be greater than ten percent (10%) of the area of the wall to which it is connected attached or painted on. or thirty-two (32) square feet whichever is less. LiLbIWa shall be by indirect means M Portable changeable electric or non -electric sign are not t3ermittsd. M Roof signs are not permitted. M Electric signs are not permitted. MW Signs Permitted in the Conservation Zone: No sign shall be permitted in a conservation zone except signs erected by the City of Kenai [(31ill Specific Definitions Pertaining to Signs: (no changes to this section) PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF T ICE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this day of October, 1996. John J. Williams, :Mayor ATTEST. Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduced: November 6, 1996 Adopted: November 13, 1996 Effective: December 13, 1996 September 23, 1996 (sp) CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PZ96-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SUPPORTING AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE 14.20.220 TO ESTABLISH SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE TOWNSITE HISTORIC DISTRICT ZONE. WHEREAS, The Townsite Historic District Zone sign requirements are presently covered in the Kenai Municipal Code under KMC 14.20.220 (e) Signs Permitted in Commercial and Industrial Zones; and WHEREAS, The Townsite Historic District Board feels that the Townsite Historic District Zone should have a sign code specifically for that zone; and WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission feels there is a need for sign code requirements specific to the Townsite Historic District Zone that reflect the character of the zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on October 23, 1996; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, RECOMMENDS THAT THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL AMEND KMC 14.20.220 to include (f) Signs permitted in the Townsite Historic District Zone. PASSED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, Alaska this 23`d day of October, 1996. 4 ,Lff' ST: Planning Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 October 23, 1996 McLane, surveyor. stated the offset is parallel to the house structure rather than perpendicular to the street to maintain the 15 feet offset. McLane commented if the structure residence qualifies for a 10 foot setback, he would like the ability to arrange that with staff. McLane noted it is a split level house with a basement rather than a true two story. McLane added he is not sure of code. McLane stated that would allow more space between property and the church property. La Shot stated staff can take a look and if it qualifies for setback staff would not be opposed to the change. VOTE: GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PZ96-66—Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission supporting amending the Kenai Municipal Code 14.20.220 to establish signage requirement: within the Townsite Historic District Zone a. MAHURIN MOVED TO APPROVE PZ96-66. BRYSON SECONDED THE MOTION. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: Michael Huhndorf, member of Townsite Historic District Board (TSH), commented that the board had discussed the special nature and flavor of a historic district due to it's visibility. Huhndorf stated the district as it sits because of it's location and trying to create a consistency in appearance of signs as the board has stated and discussed be changed to reflect the flavor of the historic district. Huhndorf noted that they did realize that the comments were taken by the city attorney regarding content and restricting the rights to freedom of speech. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Mahurin noted this has been a long-standing project from TSH. Mahurin stated that she believes that with the diminished size of Old Town that it is important that we do have a district flavor to that area. Mahurin added there is a lot of development going on. Mahurin stated she will support this resolution adding she appreciates the work of the TSH and think the Commission should support their efforts. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 Minutes October 23, 1996 Goecke apologized and asked indulgence noting he didn't get packet until today. Goecke commented we have gone over and over this sign code in the city and stated he is not totally convinced that we need to have one more sign code in this city. Goecke commented he doesn't necessary like the one we have much less add another one. Goecke noted being a business person you cannot actually have too much signage. Goecke agreed it can be over done in some instances adding he has voted against some signs. But, don't think that we need to have an inclusive sign code for the a given area. Goecke stated he feels that our sign code as we have it is sufficient for our city. Bryson commenting regarding Section 14.22.20 F(1) which describes intent of the ordinance. Bryson read, "It is intended that the sign..." asking who is going to interpret the phrase adding he didn't think he could. Bryson stated he feels that is an arbitrary area that should be clarified. Bryson stated his other comment is the exclusion of electric signs. Bryson noted that in the wintertime when people need business in that area presumably signs would only be visible for six hours of a day. Mahurin stated she knows that TSH has also talked about street lighting and with the projects going on to pave and widening of the road, there are a lot of things board is working on and talking about. Mahurin stated she agrees and doesn't think there should be electric signs. Mahurin noted that the Russians didn't have signs and that is all that is left of that era. Mahurin, noting she doesn't want to disagree with Mr. Bryson, but F1 is an intent as to why they feel there should be a special sign code for that area. Mahurin agreed that it is rather nebulous adding she felt a building inspector could help with that. Mahurin noted this is their statement of why they want a special sign code for that area. Mahurin stated she agrees with all these portions. Mahurin noted it doesn't say there can't be lights but says there will not be garish lights in that part of town. Mahurin stated that is what the ordinance is intended to do. Werner-Quade concur with Ms. Mahurin's comments adding she thought the same thing on the electric signs. Werner-Quade stated this brings to mind law offices of Cowan adding she thinks they may have lights that shine from the rafters that shine on the signs at night. Werner-Quade stated she feels this is in keeping with what the TSH has in mind. Werner-Quade commented she was pleased to see this come before us expeditiously rather than waiting to review the entire sign ordinance. Werner-Quade noted she will vote in favor of this resolution. Bryson questioned staff if there is a portion of the sign code that addresses electric signs and differentiates from lighted signs? La Shot stated he doesn't believe it does. La Shot stated this was intended to not allow electric signs but to allow indirectly lighted signs of a smaller nature. La Shot stated the first paragraph on intent that there is not too much administration can do about that when issuing a permit. La Shot stated it does say in relation to size. The ordinance was tailored to try to have something definitive that administration could use when it came time to issue a sign permit and keep it as simple as possible while reflecting the needs of the zone. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 October 23, 1996 Minutes Goecke noted that didn't answer his question. Goecke commented that even with this there is no distinct one sign other than flashing signs and any electric signs that will be permitted. Goecke stated that the intent "thing" seems to leave everything in the open to a particular individual's interpretation. Goecke commented you can interpret it one way and I'll read it and interpret it another way and who's to say who is right. Werner-Quade commented that the last line after the comma says, "and be of a size that is in scale with the building and streetis getting tired of commented that it does leave a little bit to be desired adding she these people who cannot interpret the simpbasic,Q uade commented that if a problem arose, it would seem like those people would gobefore the TSH board and the Board would make a ruling as he sign. Werner-Quade want but lets et downted o that in her opinion you can find a loop hole anywhere You plain English and read it and go with it. Bryson stated he would have to respond to that. Bryson stated if it were an issue with the building code and the city building inspector interprets it one way and you interpret it another way, do you feel you have a valid concern when it is ruled against you. Werner-Quade stated you can always go to a higher board adding she doesn't see why we have to specify every detail. Werner-Quade noted she doesn't see where the intent is that loose. Goecke stated he has to ask a question, Werner-Quade made mention if you want to put a sign there go to the Historic Board and see if this is okay. Goecke stated he doesn't know if the Board has any control of the matter. Werner-Quade stated she would correct that statement because she had said if there was a problem. Werner-Quade commented n't ay that but thereg that there is �s the g to be a problem with every sign. Goecke responded that he did possibility of that problem existing. Mahurin suggested in order to expedite this professionally, she would suggest that Ms. Werner-Quade's intent of her comments, were that if someone had a question that the TSH could interpret what their sign ordinance meant for anyone and would be available as a resource to people to answer those hypes oe i ns. curterner-Quade thanked Ms. Mahurin adding she was sure she ac Glick clarified that if there was a problem you are saying that the TSH board would make a recommendation to P&Z. Werner-Quadnoting she is not on the board o would not have every answer but would wanted to rebut the two comments madeby two members about the verbiage being vague. Mahurin would like to bring this item back to the ordinance instead of trying to interpret each other questions but what the Commission is trying to do. Mahurin noted Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 October 23, 1996 that what is before the Commission is an ordinance for a signage ordinance for Old Town. Mahurin stated she would like to call for question. VOTE: NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON NO WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE NO GLICK YES MOTION PASSED, 5-2. 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. Review of Title 14 of the Mahurin—Cabins Nord not sure what council is trying to get at but think they want us to make a determination on what definitions for cabin and cabin rentals. Nord added she is not sure if they want us to put limitations on size. Glick think this came about because of three cabins on lot and man wanted to rent them out. Councilman Smalley noted that was on James Street. Nord noted that was before she came to P&Z. Glick at this point we are to look at it, discuss it, and decide if there needs to be changes. Glick asked La Shot if staff had input. La Shot noted it has been a problem in the past. Because there is not a definition in code as to what a cabin is. The Land Use Table has a designation for cabins but we're not sure if an accessory structure or a principal structure. La Shot stated that from the administration's standpoint it needs to be cleaned up. La Shot added that there is a growing use of cabins in the city for not only recreational/commercial use but there are times people want to add to property as a secondary or accessory use. Werner-Quade commented she had gone over this again and again and what it boiled down to is this. Werner-Quade noted she had called the city attorney and cleared up a couple things. On the memo in the packet the problem seems to arise as referring in one instance as a cabin rental and next instances of cabin rentals. Werner-Quade stated that in the definition department of Title 14 we may need as many as three new definitions. One, a definition of cabin —Mr. Graves has it under the Collegiate Dictionary definition. Second would be cabin rental —that would refer to one cabin. And, third, cabin rentals --referring to more than one cabin. Werner-Quade explained the reason why is because when you start mixing rental in one paragraph and rentals in the next paragraph, you have a problem with singular and plural. In the Land Use Table, there are provisions for cabin rentals. In commercial, there is a provision for Suggested by: Historic District Board CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1727 -96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE 14.20.105(k) TO CONFORM WITH KENAPS SIGN CODE. WHEREAS, Ordinance 17 2 6 - 9 6 amending Kenai's sign code (KMC 14.20.220) to include regulations regarding signs in the Townsite Historic District Zone (TSH); and WHEREAS, KMC :4.20.105(k) now refers to the Commercial Zone and not TSH; and WHEREAS, KMC :4.20.105(k) must be changed to make it conform to the code for the new zone; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT KMC 14.20.105(k) be amended to read as follows: 14.20.105 Townsite Historic (TSH) Zoning District: (k) Signs. Signs shall be as allowed [IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE] as set forth in KMC 14.20.220[E]tL. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this day of October, 1996. John J. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduced: Adopted: Effective: September 23, 1996 (sp) November 6, 1996 November 13, 1996 December 13, 1996 Suggested by: Administratiu,. City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1728-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA INCREASING ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $3,228 IN THE AIRPORT LAND SYSTEM SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TO PURCHASE A NEW COMPUTER. WHEREAS, the computer used by the Administrative Assistant for the Airport Manager and City Manager does not work properly; and WHEREAS, it would benefit the City to replace the computer with a new, upgraded model; and WHEREAS, replacement of this computer was not budgeted, but money is available for appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA THAT ESTIMATED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BE INCREASED AS FOLLOWS: Airport Land System Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Fund Balance $3,228 Increase Appropriations: Airport Land - Computer Equipment $3,228 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 13th day of November, 1996. ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Introduction: 11/6/96 Adopted: 11/13/96 Effective: 11/13/96 CITY OF KENAI ►► C9d ean" 4 4121 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ''1II1 MEMORANDUM To: Richard A. Ross, City Manager 1/ From: Kim Howard, Administrative Assistant W Date: October 30, 1996 RE: Application for Lease - Lots 13 & 14, Block 1, Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park Attached is a lease application submitted by Tony Blomfield, d/b/a The Blomfield Company, for the above referenced property. These are the two lots adjacent to the new Courthouse on Trading Bay Road. The contaminated soil on the property has been remediated and the site will be available for lease in January or February. The applicant intends to build a commercial office building on the property. The application is being submitted as a result of a Request for Proposals solicited by the State of Alaska for an office building in Kenai or Soldotna for a "One Stop" multi -state agency facility. The closing date for the Request for Proposals was originally October 30 but was extended until November 20. Tony Blomfield plans to attend the City Council meeting of November 6 to answer any questions Council may have. At their October 23 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined the intended use complies with the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan of the City. The City Council now needs to consider the lease proposal and determine if Lots 13 & 14, Block 1, Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park should be leased to Tony Blomfield, d/b/a The Blomfield Company. The property is airport land. Prior to leasing the site, an appraisal must be reviewed and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. If Council approves the lease application, and Blomfield is awarded the state contract, I will order an appraisal. cc: Tony Blomfield d/b/a The Blomfield Company 1` 1 444,4x� 11-4-1 Attachment P /kh C:\WPD0CS\LEASES\8L0MFIEL.P&Z Date uceiNed 0 / 0�C CITY OF KENAI mbM 9: ro=tA= e 210 ,Fidalgo Ave., Kenai, Alaska 99611 283-7530� and tle) -'LEASE APPLICATION Name of Applicant { U Address �jl�D`� hLlti�i ttiS' ITV+C.Y��'aGtf� °.d�j Business Name and Address j,�j Aw--, cos Leg, AA, 4jjt70'-!7 Kenai Peninsula Borough Sales Tax No. WA (if applicable) 2 017 State Business License No. 167?2 2 (if applicable) Telephone -Wq- Gj&?-- S*T && Lot Description4 ' Desired Length of Lease f_ Property to be used fort'!(,1•lIM.q Description of Developments (type, construction, size, etc.) A ... T_ - L S. boo 5 • F IC lo. ftoo6 F Attach development plan to scale (1" = 50'), showing all buildings planned. Time Schedule for Proposed Development: -- Beginning Date f2n, I+ 10AIp Proposed Completion Date c,UjL) is 10+°r1 Estimated Value of Construction $ GON 64i� l ' .e a � YQr I +yDD+�. T� Z++ DDO Date: Q ��� l�!(Q Signed: Date: Signed: 1 CITY OF KENAI CHECK LIST FOR SITE PLANS ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE APPLICATION CAN BE ACCEPTED Drawings should be drawn to scale 1"= 50 ft.*, and must show layout of the lot applied for and the location of all improve- ments proposed. Drawings must show: 1. Existing buildings ✓ 2. Proposed buildings f 3. Parking facilities (how many spaces and where located) ✓ 4. Site improvements a. Areas to be cleared and method of disposal ✓ b. Proposed gravel or paved areas —� C. Landscaping plan (retention of natural vegetation and/or proposed planting areas) Vol 5. Building set backs ✓ 6. Drainage plan and method of snow removal ✓ 7. Circulation plan (all entrances, exits and on -site access) 8. Location of sign(s) - sign permit required ✓ 9. Fencing MW, uhapw r 10. Curb cuts (where applicable) ✓ 11. Building height ,A 12. Buildings on or near the airport on airport lands must complete FAA Form 7460-1 ✓ *This does not have to be drawn by an architect or engineer. 2 BUILDING INFORMATION On this sheet submit a drawing of building planned, drawn to scale. Scale: 1" = ft. Construction Materials (wood frame, steel building, etc.) THIS DRAWING SHOULD BE AS COMPLETE AS POSSIBLE 5eL AA&W s�eci� 19 Note: If a prepared drawing is submitted, attach to this application and disregard this page, filling in construction materials only. 3 Description of Property CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE (To be completed by the City) Annual rent rate or cost Zoned for 1-4), ", Permits required Assessments Insurance required Construction must begin by Completion date for major construction Q � /, /7-f 7 THIS APPLICATION WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE LEASE Planning Commission Approval: By: , Date of Approval 3 Chairman City Council Approval: Bys , Date of Approval City lerk 4 ALASKA DEPART NT OF COMMERCE AND ECONOMm'o DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 110806, JUNEAU, AK 99811-0806 ALASKA BUSINESS LICENSE This is to certify that the licensee named below holds an Alaska Business License covering the period January 1 through December 31 of the license year(s), or fraction thereof. 5L .3_34 _:C LOMFI=LC., CHARL3S a'JTH3t!Y 3LCMFI=LD COMPAidY 5o'3 _AST =4T„ AVE t S'.lIT--- 1 �5 ANCHO.�aGc A'K 995u3 �1t1: This license must be posted in a conspicuous place at the location. It is not transferable or assignable. 3-070 (Rev. "1) LICENSE YEAR(S) 19Y51 T;4 !U 13::6 This license shall not be taken as permission to do business in the state without having complied with the other requirements of the laws of the State of Alaska or of the United States. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT No. 8233 STATE OF ALASKA Effective: 02/02/95 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Occupational Licensing Expires: 12/31/96 P.O. Box 110806. Juneau, Ala.*a 99811-0806 Division of Occupational Licensing Certifies That Bf-jOMFIELD C05�fPArACY ,, THE Is A Registered General Contractor -Excludes Residential Commissioner: William L. Hensley 4 I p�oP�.,,�-D coNn�t �I�GI�•t� 0l�'1� IG� ISu 1 I..I�I t�l� ON cl'TY OP i�1�N �� t-�b6ED I..+�ND Wit= Vo,'• it-o" Cary R. Graves City Anomey CITY OF KENAI 210 Fidalgo Avenue Suite 200 Kenai. Alaska 99611-7794 283.3"1 FAX 283-3014 AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA and K. SC07T & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ALASKA CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER STUDY THE AGREEMENT entered into on May 28, 1996, by and between the CITY OF KENAI and K. SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC. is hereby amended as follows. Replace Section II, Paragraph 2(b) under SCOPE OF SERVICES with this language: Oversight of fundraising development and implementation by agents contracted to conduct the project's fundraising element. Preparation of grant and foundation proposals identified as potential capital or operational fund sources for the Challenger Center project. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the day of , 1996. ATTEST: Typed Name Approved by City Attorney Approved by Finance CITY OF KENAI By: Richard A. Ross, City Manager Date: CONSULTANT By: Kathleen F. Scott Title: Date: ADDENDUM TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - Page I of I Consultant City K. Scott & Associates, Inc. Grantsmanship, Project Management, Marketing October 14, 1996 Mayor John Williams and Kenai City Council City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Street, Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611 RE: The Challenger Center Project Dear Mayor Williams & Councilmembers: RECENED OCT 1 5 as KENA,I CITY CLER In accordance with Section II, paragraph 4, "no changes in the work program, once adopted and approved by the City of Kenai shall be made without prior written approval of the City" This letter is to address the matter of fundraising in the area of grants and foundations. The Challenger Center Board envisions raising substantial dollars with legislative capital funding, corporate and local fundraising campaigns through the services of a fundraising organization. Those fundraising efforts will be paid by contingency. We have delayed a discussion about grants and foundation funding applications until identifying whether there is an overlap between foundations and corporate gifts from private industry. It has become clear that there would not likely be a duplication of effort, since there is little ability for the fundraiser to be paid out the receipts from foundations or grants. In order for me, as your project facilitator, to pursue grant and foundation funding the contract scope of work needs to be changed. The amendment does not change the net affect of the contract. It simply modifies how the project hours are spent. To use project oversight time for preparing grant applications and proposals I suggest the following amendment for your approval. Replace the existing Section II, Paragraph b with this language: Oversight of fundraising development and implementation by agents contracted to conduct the project's fundraising element. Preparation of grant and foundation proposals identified as potential capital or operational fund sources for the Challenger Center project. P.O. Box 2488, Kenai, Alaska 99611 Telephone (907) 283-5130/FAX (907) 283-5918 I feel that there is sufficient clarity of responsibility between the contingency fundraiser and project oversight with this proposed change. This way either contractor could make proposals or grant applications, increasing the ability to raise funds for the project. Sincerely, Kathleen F. Scott President Cary R. Groves City Anomey CITY OF KENAI 210 Fidalgo Avenue Suite 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA and K. SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ALASKA CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER STUDY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this ( of 77. ``� , 1996, by and between the CITY OF KENAI, Alaska, hereinafter referred to as tfie "City," and K. SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining the professional services of the Consultant to provide project oversight services for the planning and development of the ALASKA CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER, hereinafter referred to as the "Project," and the Consultant is properly qualified and willing to perform such services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the City and the Consultant do mutually agree as follows: I. RETAINER The City does hereby retain the Consultant to perform the professional services herein specified, and the Consultant agrees to perform said professional services within the time limits hereinafter specified. H. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall fully and completely perform the services described as: 1. Provide facilitation services for the Alaska Challenger Steering Committee including, but not limited to arrangements for committee and sub -committee meetings, give notice of meetings to the city and the committee and provide timely summary reports of such meetings. 2. In conjunction with the Steering Committee, develop and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - Page I of 7 283-3441 FAX 283-3014 implement a plan of work that accomplishes the goals and objectives of the committee, for building the Alaska Challenger Learning Center in Kenai. Such work plan will include these elements: a) Design of a detailed organizational plan for operation of the Alaska Challenger Learning Center including development of operating agreements and organizational governance guidelines (or by-laws). Cb) Development of fundraising strategies for implementation by agents contracted to conduct the project's fundraising element. c) Coordination for preparation of construction ready architectural planning and design. d) Development and implementation of project public relations including but not limited to: • creation of project education materials • coordination with media • identification and development of sustaining relationships with national, state and local businesses, government agencies, boards, bureaus and councils assuring the broad support of the Alaska Challenger Learning Center in Kenai, Alaska 3. Where possible, costs for developing and producing color processed multi. - copies of educational materials will be included in the Project's expense budget. Costs of materials outside allowable budget costs, such as design, layout and printing will be funded outside the scope of work in this contract.. 4. No changes in the work program, once adopted and approved by the City of Kenai shall be made without prior written approval of the City. Upon conclusion of the Project, all plans and documents prepared under this Agreement shall become property of the City. 5. Nothing in this Agreement shall give the consultant or Alaska Challenger Steering Committee actual, apparent or assumed authority to enter into or bind the City of Kenai into any contract or obligation. "ary R. Graves City Anomey CITY OF KENAI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - Page 2 of 7 210 Fidalgo Avenue Sub 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 i i 283-3441 FAX 283-3014 KENAI PENINSULA 8©ROUGF F' 144 N. BINKLEY SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669-7599 BUSINESS (907) 262-4441 FAX (907)262-1892 October 15, 1996 Kenai City Council 210 Fidalgo Avenue Suite 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear City Council Members: RECEIVED OCT 2�Jg,� 4 -? MIKE NAVARRE MAYOR RE: Petition to vacate the entire of Sockeye Circle public right-of-way and associated utility easement as dedicated and/or granted by Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part One (Plat 95-32 KRD); Section 7, Township 5 North, Range 10 West, Seward Meridian, Alaska. Also being within the City of Kenai; KPB File 96-084 In accordance with AS 29.40.140, no vacation of a city right-of-way and/or easement may be made without the consent of the city council. The referenced vacation was approved by the Planning Commission subject to staff recommendations at their October 14, 1996 regularly scheduled meeting. Staffs recommendations are included in the minutes. A roll call vote was taken with all Commissioners present voting yes. This petition is being sent to you for your consideration and action. The City Council has 30 days from October 14, 1996 in which to veto the decision of the Planning Commission. If no veto is received by the Commission within the 30-day period, the decision of the Commission will stand. Draft, unapproved minutes of the pertinent portion of the meeting and other related materials are attached. Sincerely, sa M. arker Planning Director LMP: ria Attachments cc: Leo Oberts w/minutes only McLane Consulting Group w/minutes only AGENDA ITEM F. PUBLIC HEARINGS Petition to vacate the entire of Sockeye Circle public right-of-way and associated utility easement as dedicated and/or granted by Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part One (Plat 95-32 KRD); Section 7, Township 5 North, Range 10 West, Seward Meridian, Alaska. Also being within the City of Kenai; KPB File 96-084 Staff report as read by Lisa Parker. Petitione Leo T. Oberts of Kenai, Alaska PC Meeting 10/14/96 Purpose as stated in petition: To provide for more effective land subdivision with increased lot marketability. The current right-of-way does not provide access to any lots and is not constructed at this time. The petitioner owns the e)dsting Lot 23 on the easterly side of Sockeye Circle. Lot 17, on the westerly side of Sockeye Circle, is owned by George O'Guinn. Mr. O'Guinn submitted a letter agreeing to the vacation and further agreeing that the entire vacated right-of-way would attach to the lot owned by Mr. Oberts. Public notice appeared in the October 2 and October 9, 1996 issues of the Peninsula Clarion. Fourteen certified mailings were sent to owners of property within a 300-foot radius and to other interested parties. All of the receipts have been returned. Statements of nonobiection were received from: ► PTI Communications ► Enstar Natural Gas ► Homer Electric Association FINDINGS OF FACT ► The Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the plat showing the vacation on August 14, 1996 and recommended approval. ► The proposed vacation does not conflict with the enforceable policies of the KPB Coastal Management Program. ► Sufficient rights -of -way and easements have been or are being dedicated and granted to serve the surrounding properties. ► No surrounding properties will be denied access or utilities. ► Per the petition, the easement is not being used for utilities. Alternative access proposed for dedication is shown on the preliminary plat, Oberts Pillars Part 2, which received preliminary approval August 26, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve vacation of Sockeye Circle and associated utility easements as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of the final plat within one year of vacation approval. 2. The City Council of the City of Kenai has thirty days in which they may veto Planning Commission approval of the vacation. NOTE: N the vacation is denied, the petitioner has eight calendar days in which to appeal the Planning Commission denial. Written appeal must be submitted to the Kenai City Cleric. END OF STAFF REPORT Vice Chairman Bryson opened the meeting for public comment. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chairman Bryson closed the public hearing and opened discussion among the Commissioners. MOTION: Commissioner Knock moved, seconded by Commissioner Coleman, to approve vacation of Sockeye Circle and associated utility easements as requested, subject to staff recommendations. KPB PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 MEETING PAGE 8 UNAPPROVED M!NUTFS VOTE: The motion passed by unanimous consent. HAMMELMAN BRYSON VV TMORE-PAINTER BOSCACCI CARPENTER CLUTTS ABSENT YES ABSENT YES YES YES COLEMAN GANNAWAY HENSLEY JOHNSON KNOCK YES NINE YES TWO ABSENT YES YES YES YES KPB PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 MEETING PAGE 9 UNAPPROVED MINUTES THE PENINSULA CLARION KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PETITION HAS BEEN RECEIVED TO VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENT. AREA UNDER CONSIDERATION IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A. LOCATION AND REQUEST: VACATE THE ENTIRE OF SOCKEYE CIRCLE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED UTILITY EASEMENT AS DEDICATED AND/OR GRANTED BY OBERTS PILLARS SUBDIVISION PART ONE (PLAT 95-32 KRD); SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SEWARD MERIDIAN, ALASKA. ALSO BEING WITHIN THE CITY OF KENAI. B. PURPOSE AS STATED IN PETITION: TO PROVIDE FOR MORE EFFECTIVE LAND SUBDIVISION WITII INCREASED LOT MARKETABILITY. THE CURRENT RIGHT-OF-WAY DOES NOT PROVIDE ACCESS TO ANY LOTS AND IS NOT CONSTRUCTED AT THIS TIME. C. PETITIONER(Sj: LEO T. OBERTS OF KENAI, ALASKA PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1996. COMMENCING AT 7:30 P.M., OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS BUSINESS PERMITS. MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SOLDOTNA, ALASKA. ANYONE WISHING TO TESTIFY MAY COME TO THE ABOVE MEETING TO GIVE TESTIMONY; OR MAY SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE ATTENTION OF MAX BEST, OR ROBBIE HARRIS, KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 144 N. BINKLEY STREET - SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669. WRITTEN TESTIMONY SHOULD BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT NO LATER THAN WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1996. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT ROBBIE HARRIS OR MAX BEST, RESOURCE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 262-4441 (1-800-478-4441 TOLL FREE WITHIN KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH). ROBBIE HARRIS PLATTING OFFICER PUBLISH 2X (OCTOBER 2 AND 9, 1996) 9` r -ro DO IVIDSON HOMESTEAD-- TIC A l lt. 11-IR.77 I'r:� 71R. C �1 i1L I. - T. 1;IJ L I i ) ROCKING BAR A >;UBD �I//�lr t!!1 !o ��" ONSl tlllll,lblal ItF:11A1NRh:R TIL 1 ILLIAMNA : VIEW SUBDv) n COV7. FUI' I I . I I on I I CUVT. LOT 9 6UYT. QIT I 11 �, l TR. A IIOMESTEAD CA ILL SUB DIVI I10 TIL 1 711. 2 TH.:1 Ti:. 1 It: [)C IINtiUI11Rv1111T1 WF OF TV FTDWNFRtl11P— Y£.IRCT/ AROUND 1XQM51.11 1",1T,(1'lovs OBERTS_ PILLARS SU PART ON - H`GHCANDIS � I �jSUB I>,l Is I O<T!� Oi9 \�V1 Y.II i IX" IRT to --- CDrT. InT 17 .. A.S.L.S 92-41 GOUT. I1Tf t 10 \ t I I I I i 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I «� � PPP7+TT\\\III .• Y ID 12 T(�J�-Ivil(7) TR R •7 ' .1 I n n 9 \ I �9 I \ 'rt. �' It 7 'TII It T1M: til•: 90 T. Q ' Ti •• - - I 1 J 7 i 7 a ten, u ! '. —M[U mm M' .. 11-1 1 1 INFAWN1.A n v LEO O ERS I uA A DW 1 IOA It R 12 � In w ` SMALL 1TV Illt -t TOWER HILL NO. 2 1 1111t. A' 1 __. _ _ _---. ` t1 I \ () I " I': I ",I,:; I I 1� 1: � I 11; 1) 1 \ 11) E 1) 17. I T' )I Th )A 4 1 '7 7 1, 17 F- 1"),h'.11AA I 04337111 04937118 04937119 17 04837120 C 04937121 GI 049"')'7117 04937122 5 104937116 o n� 04937113 4937115 '04937114 04937ilL' MWOWWG.AdM ON ON monam noun KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH Planning Department M GIS Division 0000 000 000: forca2c, :08!00:00: PROPO-515-0 'VA(-A,-notj5 61; Ni 101A" 00W MEMORANDUM TO: ROBBIE HARRIS ti. FROM: MARGARET SPAI-I 1 DATE: October 1, 1996 RE: Sockeye Circle Vacation Kenai Peninsula Borough Coastal Management Program (KPBCMP) staff has reviewed the petition to vacate the entire of Sockeve Circle located in Section 7 of T5N, R10W, Seward Meridian. The proposed vacation does not conflict with the enforceable policies of the KPB Coastal Management Program. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. September 25, 1996 Kenai Peninsula Borcugh Planning Commission Resource Planning Department 144 North Binkley Soldotna, Alaska 99669 Attention: Robbie Harris Platting Officer Reference: Kenai Peninsula Borough Plats Dear Mrs. Harris, COMMUNICATIONS 3940 Arctic Blvd. Anchorage, Alaska 99503 907 562.1231 KRD #95-32 PTI Communications has reviewed request to vacate the entire of Sockeye Circle public Right -of -Way and associated utility easement as dedicated and/or granted by Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part One (Plat 95-32 KRD); Section 7, Township 5 North, Range 10 West, Seward Meridian, Alaska. Also being within the City of Kenai. We have no requests or objections to the action as described. Sincerely, PTI COMMUNICATIONS rm� Bill Hansen Senior Network Engineer Mc E CONSULTING GROUP August 1, 1996 Ms. Robbie Harris Kenai Peninsula Borough 144 N. Binkley St.. Soldotna, AK 99669 SUBJECT: PETITION TO VACATE SOCKEYE CIRCLE (KRD 95-32) RE: OBERTS PILLARS SUBDIVISION PART TWO Dear Ms. Harris: 962011 The entire sixty (60) feet of Sockeye Circle right -of --way is being vacated by Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part Two which is owned by Leo T. Oberts. Lot 17 of Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part One abuts the western portion of Sockeye Circle and would typically receive one half (1/2) of the vacated right-of-way. In this instance the owner of Lot 17, George O'Guinn, is allowing the entire sixty (60) feet of right-of-way to be attached to Oberts Pillars Subdivision Part Two. By signing below I agree to the above statements: 456783�0'� `A KDAIP MEMN,IDB0R0 WNNING DEPT ��'EZZZtZ� P.O. BOX 468 SOLDOTNA, AK 99669 PH: (907) 283-4218 FAX: (907) 283-3265 / PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/SECTION LINE EASEMENT PUBLIC NEARING REQUIRED UPON RECEIPT OF COMPLETE APPLICATION WITH FEES AND ALL REaUIRED ATTACH- MENTS; A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE SCHEDULED. [X] FEES - $200 NON-REFUNDABLE FEE TO HELP DEFRAY COSTS OF ADVERTISING PUBLIC HEARING. ANY REQUIRED PLAT FEES WILL BE IN ADDITION TO VACA- TION FEES. [X] PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED TO BE VACATED IS Sockeye Circle DEDICATED BY PLAT OF Oberts Pillars Part One SUBDIVISION, FILED AS PLAT NO. 95-32 IN Kenai RECORDING DISTRICT. [ ] EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD OR RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SET OUT IN (SPECIFY TYPE OF DOCUMENT) AS RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE OF THE RECORDING DISTRICT. (COPY OF RECORDED DOCUMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH PETITION) [ ] SECTION LINE EASEMENT [ ] SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF PLAT OR MAP SHOWING AREA PROPOSED TO BE VACAT- ED. IF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT WAS GRANTED BY DOCUMENT; ONE COPY OF RECORDED DOCUMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED. HAS RIGHT-OF-WAY BEEN FULLY OR PARTIALLY CONSTRUCTED? ❑ YES P3 NO IS RIGHT-OF-WAY USED BY VEHICLES/PEDESTRIANS/OTHER? ❑ YES [3 NO HAS SECTION LINE EASEMENT BEEN CONSTRUCTED? ❑ YES ❑ NO IS SECTION LINE EASEMENT BEING USED? ❑ YES ❑ NO THE PETITIONER MUST PROVIDE REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VACATION. REASON FOR VACATING Tc provide for more effective land subdivision with increased lot marketability. The current right-of-way does not provide access to any lots and is not constructea at this time. THE PETITION MUST BE SIGNED (WRITTEN SIGNATURE) BY OWNERS OF MAJORITY OF THE FRONT FEET OF LAND FRONTING PART OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR SECTION LINE EASEMENT PROPOSED TO BE VACATED. EACH MUST INCLUDE MAILING ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HIS/HER PROPERTY. ��16��18792p2'�� SUBMITTED BY: SIGNATURE NAME M. Scott McLane iED96 ?\ ADDRESS McLane Consulting Group RECEIVED n p n Rnx 4F,8 Soldotna, AK 99669 KWIPENINBORO ti PHONE (907) 283-4218 PLANNINGDEPT PETITIONERS \£Z[ SIGNATURE SIGNATURE NAME LEE- . Oberts NAME ADDRESS 40 Chinook ourt ADDRESS Kenai. AK 99611 OWNER OF Lot 23 & unsubdivided OWNER OF remainder of Oberts Pillars S/D Part One SIGNATURE SIGNATURE NAME NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS OWNER OF OWNER OF 5/91 PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PUBLIC FEARING IS NOT REQUIRED UPON RECEIPT OF COMPLETE APPLICATION WITH ALL REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS; VACATION WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. THE PETITIONER MUST SECURE AND SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS FROM UTILITY COMPANIES. IF THE EASEMENT IS WITHIN CITY LIMITS; SECURE AND SUBMIT WRITTEN CITY COMMENTS. TO ACCOMPLISH AN APPROVED VACATION; A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION MUST BE FILED WITH THE STATE RECORDER TO ENTER THE VACATION INTO THE PUBLIC RECORDS. PETITIONER MUST PAY FILING FEES (USUALLY $17 TO $20) [ ] UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED TO BE VACATED WAS SUBDIVIS GRANTED BY PLAT AS OF N0. OBERTS PILLARS PART ONE — 95-32 IN Kenai RECORDING DISTRICT. [ ] UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED TO BE VACATED WAS GRANTED BY (SPECIFY TYPE OF DOCUMENT) AS RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE OF THE RECORDING DISTRICT. (COPY OF RECORDED DOCUMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH PETITION) l6eo"m .£.V--- -7- zz--sue [ COMMENTS FROM 7/19/96 ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ATTACHED. O_C ff [.] COMMENTS FROM 7/19/96 GAS COMPANY ATTACHED. [ ] COMMENTS FROM 7/1g196 TELEPHONE COMPANY ATTACHED. I [] COMMENTS FROM CITY OF 7/19/96 ATTACHED. NINE COPIES OF PLAT OR MAP S{10WING AREA PROPOSED TO BE VACATED. IF EASEMENT WAS GRANTED BY DOCUMENT; ONE COPY OF RECORDED DOCUMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED. [ ] IF EASEMENT IS PROPOSED FOR VACATION DUE TO STRUCTURE ENCROACHING INTO EASEMENT; AS -BUILT SHOWING ENCROACHMENT MUST BE ATTACHED. IS EASEMENT BEING USED BY UTILITY COMPANY? ❑ YES P3 NO THE PETITIONER MUST PROVIDE REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VACATION. REASON FOR VACATING Platted Road is not bu�7t and ur;�iry easemPnr is not being used. Road is going to be vacated and moved in Oberts Subd. Part Two. THE PETITION MUST BE SIGNED (WRITTEN SIGNATURE) BY OWNERS OF MAJORITY OF THE FRONT FEET OF LAND FRONTING PART OF EASEMENT PROPOSED TO BE VACATED. EACH MUST INCLUDE MAILING ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HISIHER PROPER- TY. . 202122b� SUBMITTED BY: SIGNATURE NAME M. Scott McLane ADDRESS McLane Consu ting P.O. Box 468 Soldotna PHONE 283-4218 x sow�'�.s PETITIONERS: \8�pr,�.F4•�'� SIGNATURE beg;� SIGNATURE NAME Leo NAME ADDRESS 1440 Chinookour ADDRESS Kenai, Alaska 99611 OWNER OF OWNER OF 5/91 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared By: JL/mk Date: July 22, 1996 Res: PZ96-53 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: McLane Consulting Group P.O. Box 468 Soldotna, AK 99669 Requested Action: Preliminary Plat Approval Legal Description: Oberts Pillars Subdivision - Part 2 Existing Zoning: RR —Rural Residential Current Land Use: Low Density Residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: This is the second and final phase of Oberts Pillars Subdivision. Part one is attached for information. Note that a right-of-way (Sockeye Creek) is being vacated and added in another location. Installation agreement required to construct roads, drainage, etc. Onsite water and sewer required. Building Official: No comment. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. PZ96-53 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Preliminary Plat (Part 1) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Oberts Pillars Subdivision - Part 2 was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on July 19, 1996 and received from McLane Consulting Group ,and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned RR —Rural Residential and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Not available. 3) Plat does not subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There is not a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements is required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, if required, shall be shown. 7) Plat verifies that no encroachments exist. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) CONTINGENCIES: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE OBERTS PILLARS SUBDIVISION - PART 2 SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AUGUST 14 , 1996. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: Planning Secretary ._ I 14 41 .OBERTS PILLARS SUBDIVISION ZCA 4-- PART TWO LOI 12 "t, AC Lao T. Oberts. owner 1440 Chinook Court Kenai, AK. 99611 LOT 11 LOCATION 24.682 AC. M/L SITUATED :14 T14E NE 1 /4 SECTION 7 T. 5 N., R. 10 W. S.M., AK. AND THE CITY OF KENAI, THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH AND THE KENAI RECORDING DISTRICT. Surveyea by : Consulting Group ox 468 McLane SP -a I'd- ' a tn a. AK 99669 J. LOT 14 Date : July 1996 Book No. 96— Project No. 962011 i LOT 10 0 a, Drawn by . PCO Checked by Scale I* loo* KPB File No. 96-- 1 6 LOT18 17 199T680.ok ICO Scale 1. L102 AC LOT 9 4:: AC �1 LOT 15 A tc _' . p•(i : I�y,Y: -. - etc j � _ �. E; _ -I;_ - _OT C, 2.287 AC X, V -'s LOT 8 C,Cf _.bEC - - I \ - -,ILITY EASEMENTS LOT 20 ?EINC. WACATL By 1.974 AC. IS PLAT _ViR _0 L 0 16 R BEING _OT 11 VACATED LOT 21 PLAT 1 497 AC VICINITY MAP C Nook DRIVE 60, 2)2 79, LOT 22 R W qo A_ F 17- 71 CITY OF KENAI REQUEST FOR STATE GRANTS 1996197 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS HFMH,\SKFI" 1. Water duality/ouantity Development Program $ 960,000 , 2. Community Road Development 2,400,000, n ro a er Greek) 600,000- 1 -880PW . Sewer Syssttem�, Improvements 5,000,000 ' `� G��Q��C` �•,,r �? 000 ,�D� D C r . Marine Industrial Development 1,000,000 G . Library Addition 1,000,000 ADA Compliance to Public Facilities 1,000,000 TOTAL REQUEST $12,760,0100 1 I CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO, SUITE 200 KENAI, AK 99611-7794 (907) 283-7535 ' fax: (907) 283-3014 1996/97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST Suggested by: Council CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 95-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA 1996-1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO]ECI' (CiP) PRIORITY LIST FOR REQUEST FOR STATE GRANTS. WHEREAS, input for the 1996-1997 CIP list from the Kenai City Council, City Administration, and citizens of the City of Kenai has resulted in the attached prioritized CIP projects being requested of the State of Alaska; and, WIIEREAS, it is the intent of the Council That paving, water, and sewer projects in residential areas will be partially funded by forming assessment districts in order to make any available State funding go farther toward completion of the priority list; and, WHEREAS, public meetin95 were held concerning the 1996-1997 Capital Improvement List; and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Kenai, after receiving and analyzing the input from all sources and after discussion and deliberation, has decided to adopt the attached 1996-1997 CIP list; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Council of the City of Kenai pledge their affirmative vote for the maintenance and operational costs of all the City projects listed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA adopt the attached list entitled "Ci'I'Y OF KENAI, REQUEST FOR STATE GRANTS, 1996-1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS"; AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that prior to initiating paving, water and sewer projects in residential areas through the use of State funds, the City shall hold public hearings toward the formation of special assessment districts to partially fund projects listed on the Capital Improvements Project priority list. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 22nd day of November, 1995. ATTEST: hn iniams, Mayor She . Paulsen, Deputy City Clerk L MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Ross, Acting City Manager FROM: Jack La Shot, City Engineer DATE: November 1, 1996 SUBJECT: CIP Street List As requested, we have updated the attached list of streets and the current status of each. This list is intended to provide enough information to discuss future projects, however, should not be considered complete or detailed. As a desired list of streets is developed for a future project, we can provide a better cost estimate for budgeting purposes. CITY OF KENAI ROAD STATUS 01/1196) ROAD NAME LOCATION SPUR TERMINUS STATUS G/NM ALPINE AVE. ILIAMNA RD. SPUR TERMINUS G/W/NS COOK INLET VIEW DR. TERMINUS P/M ILLIAMNA RD. EVERGREEN ST. HALLER ST. SPUR SPUR 5TH AVE. (future) 5TH AVE. (future) P/M P/M MCKINLEY ST. SPUR 5TH AVE. (future) P/M GILL ST. N SPUR 5TH AVE. Ituturs) P/M SECOND AVE. EVERGREEN ST. FOREST DR. P/M THIRD AVE. EVERGREEN ST. FOREST DR. P/M 4TH AVE. EVERGREEN ST. FOREST DR. P/M O'BRIEN CT. FOREST DR. TERMINUS G/M 1ST AVE. FOREST DR. TERMINUS (East) G/M SECOND AVE. FOREST DR. TERMINUS Most) G/M M v MAINTAINED NS — NOT SPEC NM - NOT MAINTAINED W - WINTER MAINT. G=GRAVEL Pa PAVED 61G=CURB !--GUTTER LENGTH c , r COMMENTS, } o i r UPGRADE " CIP - MAINT. MAINTENANCE COST PER LF. FOR iAD90 Air: t ►, 1 bRAVEC'RbAD TOTAL COST ��< �; G Vt4 �" � y`� �+ { COST ER LF., ' STRIAAV$TRIFt DOTAL COST PAVIN „ ' { 1280 POOR, MAYBE NOT IN ROW CIP 70:7 $128,000.00 $150.00 $192,000.00 320 ACCESS TO4-PLEX CIP $100.00 $32,000.00 i150.00 048,000.00 320 $0.00 $0.00 PAVED 1993 $0.00 $0.00 2400 2400 PAVED 1993 $0.00 $0.00 2400 PAVED 1993 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2400 PAVED 1993 $0.00 $0.00 2560 PAVED 1993 $0.00 $0.00 2560 PAVED 1993 E E $0.00 $0.00 2560 PAVED 1993 MAINT. AFTER FOREST DR. (DRAINAGE) $40.00 $12,600.00 $90.00 $28,800.00 320 POOR DRAINAGE ROW NEED TRUNK STORM SEWER CIP $100.00 $64,000.00 $150.00 $96,000.00 640 ROW?POOR CONDITION CIP $100.00 $64,000.00 $150.00 $96,000.00 640 POOR CONDITION 1 .TRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP.PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJi i..."r �'.;x,+7 •.!. CIP COST PER LF.. FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD $100.00 TOTAL COST r GRAVEL' f,; $27,000.00 oq CTRI PER PAVING STRIP PAVING $150.00 TOTE T TRIP , ..SING $40,500.00 ROAD NAME THIRD AVE. LOCATION FROM TO FOREST DR. TERMINUS (East) ` STATUS q,.11i.' G/M LENGTH 270 COMMENTS 5 ;_...�xacn� CONDITION $0.00 $0.00 JEFFERSON ST. GRANT PL. WESBET CIR. 4t" AVE. TERMINUS P/M 480 PAVED 1993 CIP $100.00 $30,000.00 8150.00 $45,000.00 3RD ST. TERMINUS GlNM 300 $0.00 $ 0.00 HALLER ST. TERMINUS P/M 200 $0.00 $0.00 EADIES WAY 4TH AVE. TERMINUS P/M 640 PAVED 1993 640.00 $12,800.00 890.00 $28,800.00 CINDY CIR. 4TH AVE. TERMINUS G/M 320 CONSTRUCTED 1985 POORDRAINAGE, ROW - ENCROACHMENT CIP $40.00 $12,800.00 $90.00 $28,800.00 ASPEN ST. 4TH AVE. TERMINUS G/M 320 SPRUCE ST. N. SPUR BIRCH ST. 4TH AVE. TERMINUS G/M G/M 2080 300 GOOD GRAVEL POOR CONDITION CIP CIP $0.00 $90.00 80.00 827,000.00 850.00 $140.00 $104,000.00 $42,000.00 5`N AVE. 3RD AVE. CIP $0.00 0.00 50.00 68,000.00 FLT. PLANE ROAD SPRUCE ST. N. G/M 1360 GOOD GRAVEL CIP $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $ 68,000.00 2ND AVE. CORAL ST. COHOE AVE. PRINCESS ST. FLT. PLANE ROAD SPRUCE ST. N. G/M 1360 GOOD GRAVEL $0.00 $0.00 50.00 ,000.00 1ST AVE. SPUR G/M 1360 UPGRADED, 1989 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 40,000.00 $40 CORAL ST. MAIN ST. LOOP G/M 800 UPGRADED, 198E 80.00 $0.00 $50.00 $104,000.00 SPUR TERMINUS G/M 2080 RECONSTRUCTED 1986 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $136,000.00 PRINCESS ST MCCOLLUM DR. G/M 2720 1986NSTRUCTED MAGIC AVE. $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $84,000.00 SPUR TERMINUS G/M 1680 RECONSTRUCTED CINDERELLA ST. 50.00 $0.00 $50.00 $80,000.00 SPUR TERMINUS G/M 1600 RECONSTRUCTED MCCOLLUM DR. ROAD NAME LOCATION FROM To STATUS r LENGTH COMMENTS '- 41� , UPGRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJ. ' .. ALIAK DR. MCCOLLUM DR. SPUR G/M 1120 RECONSTRUCTED 1986 JAPONSKI DR. ALIAK DR. TERMINUS G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED LINWOOD LN. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 1200 RECONSTRUCTED REECCO FOX AVE. LINWOOD LN. TERMINUS G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED 1986 I' HUTTO ST. MAGIC AVE. TERMINUS G/M 400 19B6NSTRUCTED HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION CHISIK ST. MINK AVE. NIGHTHAWK LN. SILVER SALMON KING SALMON CHISIK ST. G/M G/M 1360 1280 FAIR/POOR COND. FAIRIPOOR COND. CIP CIP DR. 1 MUSKRAT WAY SILVER SALMON TERMINUS G/M 950 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP DR. SILVER SALMON SPUR HWY. CHISIK AVE. G/M 1350 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP DR. KING SALMON OR. MARTIN CT. CITY LIMITS G/M & 2400Gj ROW PROB LM D CIP MARTIN CT. KING SALMON DR. SILVER SALMON G/M 500 ROW PROBLEM D CIP RIDGEVIEW CT. MINK CT. MINK AVE. CHISIK ST. CHISIK ST. CHISIK TERMINUS TERMINUS TERMINUS G/NM G/M G/M 500 250 320 FAIR FAIR/POOR FAIR/POOR COND. CIP CIP CIP 3 COST PER LF. TOTAL COST r' ° - COST PER �F., STRIP PAVING TOTAL COI STRIP PAVING FOR GRAVEL f ADEQUATE ? � GRAVEL AAA $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $56,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $20,000.00 $80.00 $108,800.00 $130.00 $176,800.00 $80.00 $102,400.00 $130.00 $166,400.00 $80.00 $76,000.00 $130.00 $123,500.00 $80.00 $108,000.00 $130.00 $175,500.00 $80.00 $192,000.00 $130.00 $312,000.00 $80.00 $40,000.00 $130.00 $65,000.00 $$80.00 $40,000.00 $130.00 $65,000.00 $80.00 $20,000.00 $130.00 $32,500.00 $80.00 $25,600.00 $130.00 $41,600.00 FROM TO LOCATION " ' STATUS LENGTH COMMENTS _,GRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROACT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROD. COST PER LF. FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTAL COST - GRAVEL COST PER LF., STRIP PAVING TOT# 6T STRIP PAVING ROAD NAME S. SILVER SALMON DR. SPUR CHINOOK CT. G/M 240 FAIR CONDITION CIP $40.00 $9,600.00 $90.00 $21,600.00 CHINOOK CT. S. SILVER SALMON TERMINUS G/M 320 ECONDITION CIP $40.00 $12,800.00 $90.00 $28,800.00 CHINOOK DR. SILVER SALMON DR. TERMINUS G/M 1400 95 CIP $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $70,000.00 SWALLOW DR. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 600 FAIR CONDITION CIP $0.00 $0.00 $90.00 $54,000.00 KITTIWAKE CT. SWALLOW DR. TERMINUS G/M 500 FAIR/GOOD CONDITION CIP $0.00 $0.00 $90.00 $45,000.00 STRAWBERRY RD. SPUR KENAITZE CT. G/M 480 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $24,000.00 KENAITZE CT. TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M 880 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $44,000.00 EAGLE ROCK SPUR HWY. TERMINUS P/M 950 RECONSTRUCTED PAVED 86 $0.00 $0.00 SANDIPER LANE EAGLE ROCK TERMINUS G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 ROBIN DR. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 ' THOMPSON PL. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 320 RECONSTRUCTED 85 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $16,000.00 THOMPSON PARK SUBDIVISION TOGIAK ST. SPUR IOWA ST. G/M 1520 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $76,000.00 DOGWOOD RD. SPUR FERN ST. G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 LUPINE DR. SPUR FERN ST. G/M 1440 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $72,000.00 PRIMROSE RD. FIREWEED LN. IOWA ST. G/M 1360 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $68,000.00 FORGET-ME-NOT RD. FIREWEED LN. FERN ST. G/M 720 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $36,000.00 COMMENTS RECONSTRUCTED 84 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJ. COST PER LF: FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTAL COST - GRAVEL COST PEP STRIP PAVING I TOTAL COST STRIP PAVING ROAD NAME FROM LOCATION TO STATUS LENGTH UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $44,000.00 WILDROSE AVE. NEVADA ST. EISENHOWER LN. G/M 880 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $B0,000.00 FIREWEED LN. TOGIAK ST. LUPINE DR. G/M 1600 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $64,000.00 FERN ST. TOGIAK ST. LUPINE DR. G/M 1280 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $60,000.00 NEVADA ST. TOGIAK ST. WILDROSE AVE. G/M 1200 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $64,000.00 IOWA ST. TOGIAK ST. WILDROSE AVE. G/M 1280 RECONSTRUCTED 84 UPGRADE 94 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $52,000.00 IOWA ST. WILDROSE AVE. G/M 1040 RECONSTRUCTED 84 EISENHOWER LN. VIP SUBDIVISION WATERGATE WAY KETCH ST. WATERGATE WAY LORA DR. WATERGATE WAY LORA DR. CIP CIP $40.00 640.00 $a,000.00 $16,000.00 $so.00 $90.00 $le,000.00 $36,000.00 TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M G/M 200 400 FAIR CONDITION FAIR CONDITION $0.00 $0.00 KETCH ST. P/M 5450 PAVED 1990 CIP CIP $40.00 $40.00 $12,800.00 $12,800.00 $90.00 $90.00 $28,800.00 $28,800.00 CLIPER CIR. WATERGATE WAY WATERGATE WAY TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M G/M 320 320 FAIR CONDITION FAIR CONDITION SCHOONER CT. CIP 840.00 $16,000.00 $90.00 836,000.00 PIRATE LANE TERMINUS G/M 400 FAIR CONDITION WINDJAMMER CT. 440.00 $140,800.00 $90.00 $316,800.00 BALEEN AVE. PIRATE LANE TERMINUS G/M 3520 FAIR CONDITION CIP $0.00 $O.00 $0.00 $0.00 SET NET DR. SET NET CT. WATERGATE WAY SET NET DR. BOWPICKER LN. TERMINUS P/M P/M 3200 720 PAVED 1992 PAVED 1992 CIP $40.00 $64,000.00 $90.00 $144,000.00 BALEEN AVE. TERMINUS G/M 1600 FAIR CONDITION SEINE CT. CIP $40.00 $67,200.00 $90.00 $151,200.00 BOWPICKER LN. 1 TERMINUS TERMINUS GIM 1680 EXISTPOOR CO DITION ING D. ROAD NAME' FROM SAND DOLLAR DR. I VIP DR SALMON RUN DR. I VIP DR. LOCATION 1' "' �' STATUS LENGTH COMMENTS''" TO SALMON CT. SALMON RUN VIP DR. LORA DR. VIP DR. K.BEACH LORA DR. VIP DR. MUIR ST. VIP DR. KETCH ST. K.BEACH PIRATE LANE K.BEACH ALEENE WAY BEAVER LOOP JULIUSSEN ST. BEAVER LOOP AMES RD. BEAVER LOOP AMES RD. BEAVER LOOP DOLCHOK LN. BEAVER LOOP BASIN VIEW AMES RD. KIM-N-ANG CT. DOLCHOK LN. CUB CT. DOLCHOK LN. TERMINUS G/M 1600 TERMINUS G/M 1520 TERMINUS G/M 320 TERMINUS G/M 640 LORA DR. P/M 4820 WATERGATE WAY P/M 400 WATERGATE WAY P/M 700 WATERGATE WAY P/M 550 WATERGATE WAY P/M 900 TERMINUS G/WINS 900 TERMINUS G/M 960 TERMINUS G/M 2960 TERMINUS G/M 2960 BASIN VIEW WAY G/M 2640 DOLCHOK LN. G/M 480 TERMINUS G/M 880 TERMINUS G/M 320 FAIR/GOOD COND. FAIR/GOOD COND. FAIR/GOOD COND. FAIR CONDITION PAVED 1990 PAVED 1990 PAVED 1990 PAVED 1990 PAVED 1990 POOR CONDITION RECONSTRUCTED 87 RECONSTRUCTED 87 NORTH OF BEAV. LP. RECONSTRUCTED 87 NORTH OF BEAV. LP. FAIR CONDITION RECONSTRUCTED 87 FAIR CONDITION FAIR CONDITION 6 .TRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJ. ' CIP CIP CIP CIP COST PER LF. TOTAL COST '=>' " COSH PER LF, TOTj ;T FOR GRAVEL f STRIP PAVING STRIP ...JING ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD $ 40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $ 40.00 $ 80.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 20.00 $0.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $64,000.00 $ 60, 800.00 $12,800.00 $25,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $72,000.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $52,800.00 $0.00 $17, 600.00 $6,400.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $90.00 $ 90.00 $130.00 $50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 80.00 $ 50.00 $ 80.00 $ 80.00 $144,000.00 $136,800.00 $ 28, 800.00 $ 57, 600.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $1 17,000.00 $48,000.00 $148,000.00 $148,000.00 $ 21 1, 200.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 70, 400.00 $ 25, 600.00 7' ^ xr7 ' 4 OT�LCOST PEEL., TOTAL CAST ROAD NA '" ' '-ILIDICATION' S d COMMENT ' '' CIPG�CAFNjAL' FORCOS PER F::j GRAVELOtl `f H ;t �TFiIP �AVING STRIP PAVING FROM TO '� IMP. PROJECT ADEQUATE MAINj. - GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENPNCL, PROD. ANGLER DR. BARABARA DR. BEAVER LOOP BEAVER LOOP TERMINUS G/M TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M G/M BOAT LAUNCH RD. BLARNEY CIR. BRANNIGAN CIR. SHAMROCK CIR. BRIDGE ACCESS ALIAK DR. ALIAK DR. ALIAK DR. TERMINUS TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M G/M G/M TERMINUS G/M SHILILLAH CIR. ALIAK DR. TERMINUS G/M ROY WAY ALIAK DR. BUMBLEBEE ST. G/M DAVIDSON ST. BUMBLEBEE ST. LAWTON DR. SPUR DAVIDSON ST. GOLF COURSE TERMINUS G/M TERMINUS G/M TON TERMINUS G/M rl ONIAL DR. LAWTON DR. G/M DLELIGHT TERMINUS G/M . KAKNU WAY G/M KULILA PLACE DOLLY VARDEN ST. CROW CT. TINKER LN. TERMINUS G/M 5800 RECONSTRUCTED 87 CIP $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $280,000.00 $40.00 $73,600.00 $90.00 $165,600.00 1840 2640 POOR DRAINAGE CITY HAS REBUILT $40.00 $105,600.00 $90.00 $237,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $50.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 240 240 240 FAIR CONDITION FAIR CONDITION FAIR CONDITION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $50.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 240 FAIR CONDITION $40.00 $19,200.00 $90.00 $43,200.00 480 FAIR CONDITION $80.00 $0.00 $40.00 $80.00 $90.00 $40.00 $80.00 $0.00 $57,600.00 $0.00 $25,600.00 $76,800.00 $45,000.00 $9,600.00 $44,800.00 $0,00 $130.00 $50.00 $90.00 $130.00 $130.00 $90.00 $130.00 660.00 $93,600.00 $36,000.00 $57,600.00 $124,800.00 $65,000.00 $21,600.00 $72,800.00 812,000.00 720 POOR CONDITION CIP 720 RECONSTRUCTED 88 640 PARTIALLY CONST. 93/94 NEEDS ROAD CAP AFTER WATER INSTALLED 960 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP 500 240 POOR CONDITION - CONSTRUCT SMALL PORTION TO LAWTON DR. FAIR CONDITION CIP 560 240 FAIR/POOR COND. GOOD CONDITION CIP 7 COMMENTS ';-11'1 RADE uP - CAPITAL IMP.PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJ. COST PER LO. ' FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD - TOTAL CO$T GRAVEL 'T FER LF., COS STRIP PAVING TOT/ T STRI! LNG ROAD NAME ~ '":LOCATION' `�t' FROM TO StATUS LENGTH 240 POOR CONDITION CIP $80.00 $19,200.00 $130.00 $31,200.00 PENNY CT. TINKER LN. TERMINUS G/M KENAI AVE. STP TERMINUS G/M 2880 SAND/GRAVEL ROAD POOR CONDITION - TO BE IMPROVED 97 - DUNES PROJECT CIP $40.00 $115,200.00 $90.00 $259,200.00 2350 40.00 80.00 SPRUCE ST. SOUTH SPUR KENAI AVE. P/M 1650 PAVED 89 $0.00 $0.00 LAWTON DR. CANDLELIGHT DR. GLACIER ST. P/M SHOTGUN DR. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 880 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP $40.00 $35,200.00 890.00 879,200.00 2400 VALHALLA RECONSTRUCTED 83 _ 8000 60.00 850.00 $120,000.00 N. DOGWOOD RD. SPUR TERMINUS G/M N. LUPINE DR. SPUR TERMINUS G/M 1200 RECONSTRUCTED 83 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $60,000.00 RECONSTRUCTED 83 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $100,000.00 PHILLIPS DR. N. DOGWOOD RD. N. LUPINE DR. G/M 2000 RECONSTRUCTED 85 S0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $100,000.00 STANDARD DR. N. DOGWOOD RD. N. LUPINE DR. G/M 2000 STANDARD DR. G.M 1920 RECONSTRUCTED 85 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $96,000.00 RICHFIELD DR. N. DOGWOOD RD. 3W SUBDIVISION RECONSTRUCTED 85 CIP $40.00 $25,600.00 $90.00 $57,600.00 ROSS ST. SPUR WORTHAM ST. G/M 640 TERMINUS G/M 2250 1+810' - 19901 CIP $40.00 $90,000.00 $90.00 $202,500.00 WORTHAM ST. ROSS ST. WOLFE ST. WORTHAM ST. DEVRAY ST. G/M 960 CIP $40.00 $38,400.00 $90.00 $86,400.00 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP $40.00 $19,200.00 $90.00 $43,200.00 RANCE CT. WOLFE ST. TERMINUS G/M 480 ROAD NAME `' LOCATION 1 StAtus- FROM TO+ DEVRAY ST. TERMINUS TERMINUS G/M SHANE CT. WOLFE ST. TERMINUS G/M JOHNISSE CT. WORTHAM ST. TERMINUS G/M COOK INLET VIEW SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G DR. LILAC LANE COOK INLET SPUR P/M C/G VIEW DR. WILDWOOD DR. SPUR CITY LIMITS P/M MOMMSEN SUBDIVISION 1ST ST. FLORIDA AVE. CAL FORMA AVE. P/M C/G SECOND ST. I FLORIDA AVE. I CALIFORNIA AVE. I P/M C/G 1ST ST. REDOUBT AVE. FLORIDA AVE. P/M C/G SECOND ST. REDOUBT AVE. FLORIDA AVE. P/M C/G CALIFORNIA AVE. WILDWOOD DR. PAST SECOND ST. P/M C/G FLORIDA AVE. 1ST ST. SECOND ST. P/M C/G LENGTH COMMENTS ; " UPGRADE COST PER LF: TOTAL COST COST PER LF., TOTAL COST CIP - CAPITAL FOR GRAVEL STRIP PAVING STRIP PAVING a .. IMP. PROJECT ADEQUATE Wo! MAINT. - GRAVEL..IiOAD; . l MAIyTE�ANCE CIP $40.00 $51,200.00 $90.00 $115,200.00 1280 480 FAIR/POOR COND. CIP $40.00 $19,200.00 $90.00 $43,200.00 560 GOOD GRAVEL $0.00 50.00 850.00 S28,000.00 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $0.00 1200 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 S0.00 1520 POOR CONDITION, STRIP RESURFACE $0.00 170.00 $162,400.00 2320 NEEDS MAJOR CIP RECONSTRUCTION 1160 POOR CONDITION REPAIR CG CIP $0.00 $70.00 $81,200.00 NEEDS MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION REPAIR CG CIP $0.00 $70.00 $81,200.00 1160 POOR CONDITION NEEDS MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION $0.00 $0.00 1160 RECONSTRUCTED IN 1984 $0.00 $0.00 1160 RECONSTRUCTED IN 1984 CIP $0.00 $70.00 $67,200.00 960 POOR CONDITION NEEDS MAJOR WORK CIP $0.00 $70.00 $61,600.00 880 POOR CONDITION NEEDS MAJOR WORK LOCATION STATUS LENGTH COMMENTS ',' '.' GRADE COST PER LF. TOTAL COST' I COST ER LF;, FAVfNG TOT, ST ROAD NAME FROM TO CIP - CAPITAL FOR GRAVEL STRIP STRIP rNVING IMP.PROJECT ADEQUATE MAINT. - GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENANCE INLET WOOD SUBDIVISION: ALL ARE CONSTRUCTED IN $0.00 $0.00 P/M C/G 85/86 WOODSIDE AVE. CHANNEL INLET WOODS 280 $0.00 $0.00 DR. LEEWARD DR. INLET WOODS WINWARD DR. 560 $0.00 $0.00 DR. CHANNEL WAY REDOUBT AVE. BACKWOOD AVE. 2600 $0.00 $0.00 WINWARD DR. CHANNEL WAY TERMINUS 560 $0.00 $0.00 INLET WOODS DR. CHANNEL WAY EQUINOX WAY 840 $0.00 $0.00 PORTSIDE DR. INLET WOODS EQUINOX WAY 560 $0.00 $0.00 DR. TWILIGHT WAY PORTSIDE DR. TERMINUS 240 $0.00 $0.00 EQUINOX WAY CHANNEL WAY BACKWOOD AVE. 1400 $0.00 $0.00 WEDGEWOOD DR. EQUINOX WAY CHANNEL WAY 440 $0.00 $0.00 MEANDER LANE EQUINOX WAY CHANNEL WAY 720 $0.00 $0.00 HEDLEY DR. MEANDER LN. BACKWOOD AVE. 400 $0.00 $0.00 BACKWOOD AVE. EQUINOX WAY CHANNEL WAY 720 $0.00 80.00 WOODLAND SUBDIVISION ALL ARE CONSTRUCTED IN 68 68 $0.00 $0.00 P/M C/G & 78 & 80'S CONSTRUCTION WILL OVERLAY - RECONSTRUCTIO N WITHIN 5-10 YRS. CHIP SEALED ONCE 5^' AVE. FOREST DR. TERMINUS P/M 1300 HALF CONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 10 ROAD NAME ! LOCAtIOk ` 5J14Ti/S LENGTH FROM TQ REDOUBT AVE. I FOREST DR. I TERMINUS I P/M 11900 CEDAR DR. 5'" AVE. ELM AVE. 1840 FIR DR. LAUREL DR. ASH AVE. ASH AVE. PINE AVE. WALNUT AVE. WALNUT AVE. OAK AVE. REDOUBT AVE. REDOUBT AVE. 680 440 2160 760 MAPLE DR. CYPRESS DR. SYCAMORE CIR. WALNUT AVE. TERMINUS 320 SYCAMORE ST. WALNUT AVE. REDOUBT AVE. 760 POPLAR CIR. WALNUT AVE. TERMINUS 480 ALDER CT. SYCAMORE ST. TERMINUS 80 JUNIPER CT. SYCAMORE ST. TERMINUS 160 HEMLOCK AVE. CEDAR DR. 5'" AVE. 640 PINE AVE. FOREST DR. 5'" AVE. 5'" AVE. 1160 1640 ASH AVE. CEDAR DR. BEECH AVE. MAPLE DR. TERMINUS 160 FIR DR. MAPLE DR. 600 OAK AVE. FOREST DR. WALNUT AVE. 320 ELM AVE. WALNUT AVE. REDOUBT DR. POPLAR CIR. 2080 COMIu�NTS ' ¢' t "', ia..{ UPGRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT. MAINTENANCE PROJ. COST PER LF: 4 FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTAL COST - "' GRAVEL COST PER LF., STRIP PAVING TOTAL COST " STRIP PAVING $0.00 $0.00 HALF CONSTRUCTED POOR DRAINAGE WEST END $0.00 $0.00 60.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 60.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CONSTRUCTION - LATE BO'S $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 11 RDE COMMENTS: CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT. FOR PER LF• ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTAL GR VEL COST GRAVEL STRIP PAVING O Ti STIF i G STATUS LENGTH ROAD NAME LOCATION FROM TO i MAINTENANCE I PROJ. 60.00 S0.00 ALDER AVE. REDOUBT DR. CYPRESS DR. 720 $0.00 $0.00 LARCH AVE. ALDER AVE. CYPRESS DR. 320 $0.00 $0.00 NORTHGATE SUBDIVISION ALL ARE P/M C/G PINE AVENUE OLD CONST. TERMINUS 300 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PINE AVE. PONDEROSA ST. WESTWOOD CIR. FOREST DR. PINE AVE. PINE AVE. 86 ADDITION TERMINUS TERMINUS 660 480 360 $0.00 $0.00 COTTONWOOD FOREST DR. TERMINUS P/M 200 CONSTRUCTED 1977 $0.00 $0.00 CIR. 4M AVE. FOREST DR. TERMINUS P/M C/G 2480 EAST OF FOREST DR. RECONSTRUCTED 83 60.00 $0.00 BIRCH ST. SPUR 5'" AVE. P/M C/G 2880 RECONSTRUCTED 83 G/M 300 CONSTRUCTED 95 $0.00 $50.00 $15,000.00 DORENDA CT. BIRCH ST. TERMINUS $0.00 $0.00 SPRUCE ST. SPUR TERMINUS P/M 2360 REEC6ONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 SOUTH FOREST DR. SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G 2000 RECONSTRUCTED 82 SOUTH'SOUTH REDOUBT TERRACE ALL ARE P/M C/G CONSTRUCTED IN 1968, NEEDS REPAIRS 68 CONSTRUCTION NEEDS OVERLAY $0.00 $0.00 RECONSTRUCTIO N IN 5.10 YRS. 80.00 80.00 $0.00 $0.00 TANAGA AVE. GILL ST. SOUTH TERMINUS TERMINUS 920 120 CONSTRUCTED 95 HAIDA DR. TANAGA AVE. 12 LOCATION FROM TO STATUS LENGTH COMMENTS;' UPGRADE CIP - CAPITAL IMP.PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE PROJ. COST PER LF. FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTAL COST -- ' GRAVEL COST PER LF., STRIP PAVING TOTAL COST STRIP PAVING ROAD NAME 560 0.00 0.00 GILL ST. SOUTH SPUR FATHOM DR. FATHOM DR. FOREST DR. SOUTH TOYON WAY 1560 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 160 $0.00 $0.00 SALMO CIR. FATHOM DR. TERMINUS STELLAR DR. FOREST DR. LOOPS TO SOUTH FOREST DR. SOUTH 1880 SOUTH HALF CONSTRUCTED 85 NORTH HALF CONSTRUCTED 68 $0.00 $0.00 COHOE CIR. STELLAR DR. TERMINUS 160 $0.00 $0.00 900 CONST. 76 $ 0.00 $0.00 TOYON WAY FOREST DR. SOUTH END A/C P/M 700 NEEDS PAVING A/C, CG $0.00 $80.00 $56,000.00 TOYON WAY END A/C FATHOM G/M 2800 RECONSTRUCTED 83 $0.00 $0.00 MAIN ST. LOOP SPUR WILLOW ST. P/M C/G 1640 RECONSTRUCTED 85 $0.00 $0.00 MAIN ST. LOOP WILLOW ST. SPUR P/M C/G 920 RECONSTRUCTED 83 $0.00 S0.00 BARNACLE MAIN ST. LOOP WILLOW ST. P/M C/G ATTLA WAY WILLOW ST. CARRS BLDG. P/M C/G 440 RECONSTRUCTED 78 $0.00 $0.00 FIDALGO SUBDIVISION ALL ARE P/M C/G CONSTRUCTED 1981 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FIDALGO AVE. BIDARKA ST. WILLOW ST. S. 440 $0.00 $0.00 BIDARKA ST. MAIN ST. LOOP SPUR 1240 $0.00 S0.00 BARNACLE WAY BIDARKA ST. WILLOW ST. S. 680 300 $0.00 $0.00 ATTLA WAY CAVIAR ST. WILLOW ST. S. CAVIAR ST. BARNACLE WAY I SPUR 720 $0.00 $0.00 13 ROAD NAME `> LOCATION'' ti "' '' ; STATUS LENGTH COMMEftTS 9 b TRADE COST PER LF. ` TDTAL GOS F ",;,. C05T PER � F, TOT/ ST FROM TO • - CAPITAL FOR GRAVEL STRIP PAVING STRI ING IMP. PROJECT ADEQUATE MAINT. - GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENANCE Pool WILLOW ST. S. SPUR TOWER P/M 5720 RECONSTRUCTED BY $0.00 $0.00 STATE IN 1980 WILLOW ST. N. TOWER TERMINUS P/M C/G 400 CONSTRUCTED 1985 $0.00 $0.00 TRADING BAY RD. MAIN ST. LOOP AIRPORT WAY P/M C/G 1720 RECONSTRUCTED 92 $0.00 $0.00 GRANITE POINT WILLOW ST. N. TRADING BAY P/M 520 OVERLAY $0.00 $70.00 $36,400.00 ST. RD. RECONST. NEEDED SOON GRANITE POINT WILLOW ST. N. GRANITE POINT P/M C/G 400 RECONSTRUCTED 92 $0.00 $0.00 ST. CT. GRANITE POINT TRADING BAY CARRS/KMART P/M C/G 500 CONSTRUCTED 92 $0.00 $0.00 ST. RD. FBO ROAD MAIN ST. LOOP TERMINUS P/M C/G 160 RECONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 1985 AIRPORT WAY WILLOW ST. N. SPUR P/M C/G 2320 RECONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 1985 FRONTAGE ROAD BRIDGE ACCESS MAIN ST. P/M C/G 3600 CONSTRUCTED 1981 $0.00 $0.00 RD. (PORTION RECONST.) SPUR VIEW DR. SPUR FRONTAGE P/M C/G 280 OLD RYAN'S DR. $0.00 $0.00 CONSTRUCTED 1981 SPUR VIEW DR. FRONTAGE SR. HOUSING P/M C/G 680 OLD FAA ROAD $0.00 $0.00 CONSTRUCTED 92 SENIOR CT. S. SPUR DR. TERMINUS P/M C/G 400 RECONSTRUCTED 92 $0.00 $0.00 LAKE ST. SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G 680 RECONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 1985 MARINE AVE. LAKE ST. BLUFF ST. P/M C/G 840 RECONSTRUCTED $0.00 $0.00 1985 14 r a ROAD NAME • .;-: iOG�AtIGN' . + �� ^�"'"? TO" f . PROM .. ' ' $ib : q �y ttr f" 1' :4oM �t i' , 5 a + 7 r;' I ,y UpbitI DE ".v?` CIP - CAPITAL IMP. PROJECT MAINT, - COST PENLP: FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL ROAD TOTALCQB rt,' ' GRAVEL �;.. CO& .�! ' Sj�tIP P t MG ,, _• `TOTAL COST STRIP PAVING MAINTENANO WILLOW ST. S. SPUR PENINSULA AVE. P/M C/G 440 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVER ST. RECO $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $22,000.00 NEEDED 3-5 YRS. 600 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVER ST. RECO $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $30,000.00 BLUFF ST. SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. PENINSULA AVE. LAKE ST. BROAD ST. P/M C/G 840 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVERLAT. 80.00 80.00 850.00 842,000.00 NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 1080 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVER ST. RECO $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $54,000.00 BROAD ST. SPUR RIVERVIEW DR. P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 1360 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVER ST. RECO $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 868,000.00 MAIN ST. SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 1640 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVERLAT. 50.00 S0.00 $50.00 882,000.00 OVERLAND AVE. UPLAND ST. ALASKA AVE. P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 560 CONSTRUCTED 1967 ROVERLAY - ECO ST. 80.00 :1 80.00 850.00 $28,000.00 ALASKA AVE. TERMINUS TERMINUS P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 560 CONSTRUCTED 1967 OVER ST. RECO $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 828,000-00 MISSION ST. OVERLAND AVE. COOK AVE. P/M C/G NEEDED 3-10 YRS. 15 GbN11N �t'"i li 'I Os JUDE ��1, ` r j CIP CAPITAL 11' IMP. PROJ�T MAINT. MAINTENANCE PROJ. COST PE L�:;; � FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL j10AD rbr 4 CtiS1t"? � ��'" �#RAEL F COST �� I•E•: �Tkl�'"�'At��Nc3{ h 8YRIF Jl�i', , lil Sj $i..o 'tEt�> TH f ROAD NAME''`) �,:•r i G`k1 tlN " r i' R awn is`t�rya FROM T19 V r' CONSTRUCTED 1967 ROVERLAY - CO ST. NEEDED 3-10 YRS. SO.00 :J- $0.00 $50.00 $28,000.00 COOK AVE. UPLAND ST. MAIN ST. P/M C/G 560 PAVED 1990 OVERLAT. RECONS NEEDED 3-10 YRS. $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 644,000.00 UPLAND ST. MISSION ST. OVERLAND AVE. P/M C/G 880 HIGHLAND AVE. MAIN ST. UPLAND ST. MAIN ST. BROAD ST. P/M C/G 920 PAVED 1990 OVERLAY. RECONST NEEDED 3-10 YRS. $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $46,000.00 G/M G/M 840 920 GRAVEL PORTION GRAVEL PORTION $40.00 $40.00 $33,600.00 $36,800.00 $90.00 $90.00 $75,600.00 — $82,800.00 COOK AVE. RIVERVIEW DR. PENINSULA AVE. MAIN ST. G/M 240 SEINGG DESIGNED • TEA NO IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED $0.00 $0.00 MISSION/MAIN ALONG BLUFF FOR 9PLANNED 80.00 $0.00 MISSION ST. OVERLAND AVE. ALASKA AVE. G/M 500 $0.00 S0.00 WALKER LN. SPUR TERMINUS P/M C/G 2400 REE000NSTRUCTED 82 SPUR LAWTON DR. P/M C/G 1600 REE000NSTRUCTED 82 $0.00 $0.00 TINKER LN. N. RECONSTRUCTED50.00 1982 $ 0.00 li LAWTON DR. WALKER LN. TINKER LN. P/M C/G 5280 RECONSTRUCTED 1982 $0 .00 $ 0.00 ROGERS RD. SPUR LAWTON DR. P/M C/G 480 16 UPGRADE:.' ' Clp • CAPITAL ' IMP. PROJECT MAINT. MAINTENANCE 000J. COST PER LF: FOR ADEQUATE GRAVELROAD iOjAl, Od' �"1'pr" GRAVEL O PER LF. S► P. TdIP.PAVING " 70TA COST r STRIP PAVING ROAD NAME ' '. LOCdtION FROM TO e r �, ,� r I y r 4 CONSTRUCTED 1986 $0.00 $0.00 TERN AVE. WALKER LN. BRIDGE ACCESS RD. P/M 800 CONSTRUCTED 1988 $0.00 $0.00 SPRUCEWOOD RD. TERN AVE. TERMINUS P/M 500 CONSTRUCTED 1968 OVERLAY- T. NEEDED 5-10 YRS. $0.00 $0.00 TERN AVE. WALKER LN. PORTLOCK ST. P/M 520 CONSTRUCTED 1968 OVERLAY - RECONST. NEEDED 5-10 YRS. $0.00 10.00 STERLING PL. TERN AVE. TERMINUS P/M 440 STERLING ST. TERN AVE. HARBOR AVE. P/M 400 CONSTRUCTED 1968 OVERLAY RECONS/0T. NEEDED 5-10 YRS. /0.00 .00 CONSTRUCTED 1968 CONSTRUCTED 68 CONSTRUCTED 1983 OVERLAY- T. NEEDED 5-10 YRS. 10.00 80.00 HARBOR AVE. STERLING ST. PORTLOCK ST. P/M 280 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PORTLOCK ST. TERN AVE. WALKER LN. HARBOR AVE. TERN AVE. P/M P/M 450 1100 PORTLOCK ST. ED TO DE ACCESS UPGRADE NO TOGAS WELL $0.00 $0.00 CHILDS AVE. BRIDGE ACCESS RD. TERMINUS N/M N/S 1280 POOR DRAINAGE POOR DRAINAGE R INAG OWNERS PARTIALLY UPGRADED $40.00 $22,400.00 $90.00 $50,400.00 VAN ANTWERP BRIDGE ACCESS RD. TERMINUS N/M N/S 560 17 COMMENTS' JRADE CIP - CAPITAL i IMP.PROJECT COST PER LF. FOR ADEQUATE TOTAL COS+- ` GRAVEL COST PpER' F.. STRIP ER' TOT, 5T STRIP —,/ING ROAD NAME LOCATION FROM TO STATUS LENGTH MAINT. - GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENANCE PROD. INLET VIEW SUBDIVISION ALL ARE P/M C/G CONSTRUCTED 1968 $0.00 $0.00 PAULA ST. LAWTON DR. ROGERS RD. 560 CONSTRUCTED 68 OVERLAY - RECONST. 3-10 i0.b0 f0.00 YRS. PAMELA CT. ROGERS RD. TERMINUS 240 CONSTRUCTED 68 OVERLAY • RECONST. 3.10 $0.00 $0.00 YRS. ROGERS RD. LAWTON DR. SUSIEANNA LN. 2040 CONSTRUCTED 68 OVERLAYRECONST. 3 10 $0.00 $0.00 YRS. NORMAN ST. ROGERS RD. TERMINUS 520 CONSTRUCTED 1985 $0.00 $0.00 SUSIEANNA LN. ROGERS RD. NORMAN ST. 920 CONSTRUCTED 1985 $0.00 $0.00 DEEPWOOD PARK SUBDIVISION ALL ARE P/M C/G CONSTRUCTED 1977 $0.00 $0.00 TINKER LAWTON TERMINUS P/M 1280 CONSTRUCTED 77 $0.00 $0.00 DEEPWOOD CT, AUK ST. TERMINUS P/M C/G 520 CONSTRUCTED 77 $0.00 $0.00 480 CONSTRUCTED 77 $0.00 $0.00 AUK ST. (EAST TINKER LN. MIDDLE AUK P/M C/G HALF) 520 CONSTRUCTED 1983 $0.00 $0.00 AUK ST. (WEST MIDDLE AUK WOODED GLEN P/M C/G HALF) 680 CONSTRUCTED 1983 $0.00 $0.00 WOODED GLEN CT. LAWTON DR. TERMINUS P/M C/G 2560 RECONSTRUCTED984 STRIP PAVED $0.00 $0.00 LINWOOD LN. SPUR LAWTON DR. P/M 1989 18 r f3�a' r ,'�_ ,'�' �`GMIN „ M x `F� i t.. r• �~ UP(iRAbE CIP - CAPITA[ IMP. PROJECT MAINT. - MAINTENANCE COST It FOR ADEQUATE GRAVEL hOAq ;TO AL6C� I'.; �" 0 V�I: I �t'• CO$T r: &RIP , A� d aGT�,�+COST sTRiP PAVING t 10AD'NXME'' } �Mr; l�71a ':y"t{0.t'' { ri I FROM d r , ,' ,t «�.��� iSfJ 7US' SPUR TERMINUS G/P/M 960 RECONSTRUCTED 86 $0.00 $50.00 $48,000.00 LINWOOD LN. [NORTH) :RECONSTRUCTED 84 STRP PAVED 89 S0.00 S0.00 CANDLELIGHT DR. SPUR LAWTON DR. P/M q3640 LAWTON DR. TINKER LN. N. CANDLELIGHT DR. P/M CONSTRUCTED 1984 STRIP PAVED 1989 $0.00 $0.00 COLONIAL DR. LINWOOD LN. WEST G/M 280 REEC8ONSTRUCTED RECONSTRUCTED 984 STRIP PAVED 1989 R984 STRRP PAVECTEDD 1989 RECONSTRUCTED984 STRIP PAVED 1989 POOR CONDITION 80.00 50.00 $50.00 $14,000.00 50.00 50.00 KAKNU WAY LINWOOD LN. BAKER ST. P/M 2600 80.00 $0.00 KIANA LN. CANDLELIGHT DR. BAKER ST. P/M 600 $0.00 $0.00 BAKER ST. KIANA LN. KAKNU WAY P/M 1600 CIP $40.00 826,400.00 590.00 859,400.00 KIANA LN. DOLLY VARDEN ST. LINWOOD LN. G/M 660 POOR CONDITION POOR CONDITION CIP $80.00 $102,400.00 $130.00 8166,400.00 COLONIAL DR. LINWOOD LN. EAST G/M 1280 CIP $80.00 $46,400.00 $130.00 $75,400.00 STEELHEAD CT. TINKER LN. TERMINUS G/M 580 CIP $40.00 $20,800.00 $90.00 $46,800.00 KULILA PL. KAKNU WAY DOLLY VARDEN ST. G/M 520 FAIR/PCONDITOR ION ON $2,955,000.00 $9,927,900.00 TOTAL LINEAR FEET 290,830 —ci OnAn Atun TnTAI rnsT FOR STRIP PAVING TOTAL UUJI ren Lr. run r��cuvr.•� �+••^-�- ••-• - - -- - 19 FRECEI:VEDKenai Peninsula 1996 asource Conservation S Development District, Inc. K E ale hone (907) 283-7493 P �� C i TY CE O. Box 800 ` p K Kenai. Alaska 99611 Subject: Final Ice Arena Date: 10-28-96 Feasibility Report To: Ice Rink Study Oversight Committee Members The Final Ice Arena Feasibility Study Report has recently been compiled and produced by the Kenai Peninsula Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) District. As you are aware, the Kenai Peninsula Borough Economic Development District (EDD) has provided overall leadership and guidance in the preparation of this study, which examines the socioeconomic impact of ice arena facilities in various communities throughout the Kenai Peninsula Borough. The Kenai Peninsula RC&D District and the Kenai Peninsula Borough EDD would like to invite your participation in a meeting from 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM, on November 7,1996, at the Kenai Peninsula RC&D Office, located at 110 Trading Bav Road. Suite 150. Kenai. Alaska. It is our thought to bring together the members of the Ice Rink Study Oversight Committee and present the findings of the final report and discuss future actions and strategies for ice arena funding and development on the Kenai Peninsula. If you are not able to travel to the meeting, please call our RC&D Coordinator, Mark Weatherstone, by November 4, 1996, and he will arrange a teleconference call for those unable to attend. If you have additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact our office at 907- 283-7493. Thank you for your interest and we look forward to seeing you. �w Charles Quarre President Kenai Peninsula RC&D District DEPT. OF COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS Division of Community and Rural Development The Honorable John Williams Mayor, City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611-7794 14 October, 19 RECC 1996 KF°.'.:iTY CLERK TONY KNOWLES. P.O. Box 112100 Juneau, Alaska, 99811-2100 Fax: (907) 465-3212 JTPA 465-4890 STEP 465-4863 Head Start 465-4860 Block Grants 465-5541 RDA 465-5539 RE: Intent to Apply for FY96 CDBG Grant Dear Mayor Williams.- We recently received your "Notice of Intent to Submit a CDBG Application" card, and I am now writing to offer technical assistance with the development of your project and application. Specifically, I need to make sure that your project will be an eligible activity, and will fulfill CDBG's national objective of benefiting low and moderate income (LMI) people. 1. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY: Your Intent to Apply card indicated that you are seeking grant funding for a Clinic. This is an eligible activity under the Community Development category. 2. LMI BENEFIT: As you may be aware, the purpose of the CDBG program is to serve LMI people as beneficiaries of the program. This goal can be accomplished in several ways; primarily through an area -wide benefit. An LMI percentage is computed for each community in Alaska, using available census data. When that community is over 51% LMI on an area -wide basis, most projects will automatically meet the LMI benefit. The community of Kenai has an area -wide LMI percentage of 31.86%, which means less than half of the community is low and moderate income. Therefore, Kenai does not meet the area -wide benefit, and the project must benefit LMI people in some other way. One option is to take an income survey of the community in an attempt to show that the census percentage that we have is incorrect. I can provide you with survey information if you decide to explore this option. This is, of course, not a fool -proof method, as it is always possible that after you've gone through the work of conducting a survey, you find that the community really is less than 51% LMI. Additionally, a great deal of work is involved with taking this survey. Specific guidelines must be followed in conducting the survey. I would normally recommend taking a survey as a last resort. 21-P3LH rre ;n reeve eo [:ae2r o y G. D City of Kenai 14 October, 1996 Page Two Another way to meet the LMI benefit is through "Limited Clientele". This is used when a project benefits not everyone in the community, but only a certain portion of people, as with street lights in a low-income section of town, for example. You might consider this option if you were to change your project, as the Clinic would likely benefit everyone in the community rather than a limited clientele. Job creation or retention is another way to meet the LMI benefit requirement. To meet this benefit, your project would have to create or retain jobs for LMI people. These jobs must be a direct result of the project. For example, if you were to build a restaurant, and hire three LMI individuals to work in that restaurant, those jobs would be a direct result of the project. If, however, you were to build a fuel storage facility, and due to the increased income in the community more jobs became available in the private sector, those jobs would not be considered a direct result of the project. For job retention, the jobs must already exist, must be filled by LMI individuals, and must be in danger of being lost if the project is not carried out. Another requirement is that the jobs must be permanent in nature. Temporary construction jobs (while building the project) do not count. With the project you describe, it appears that the LMI benefit will be difficult to establish short of taking a survey. Alternatively, we could discuss other possible project options which may meet the LMI benefit in another way. Please call me at 465-5541 at your earliest convenience so we can start working on this. Sincerely, Melanie Antioquia Grants Administrator cc: Midge Clouse, LGS, Anchorage CITY OF KENA 1- 4 it Od Cap" 4 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 ~ TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 bylld AF�.wlnalr MEMORANDUM 1 I I 1992 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk City of Kenai i DATE: November 1, 19 6 RE: PERSONNEL ARBITRATION BOARD APPLICATIONS The Personnel Arbitration Board, by code, is to have a membership of 12 people who are residents of the City of Kenai, cannot be members of any other commission, committee or board and cannot be an elected official or employee of the city. (A copy of the present Board membership is attached for your information.) As you know, I have had some difficulty in acquiring applications for appointment to the Board and other boards, commissions and committees. Following are applications I recently received from members of the community who are interested in an appointment to the Personnel Arbitration Board. In order to collect these applications, I sent letters to approximately 40 residents of the city. Some of the names were suggested by other employees and some I took from a random review of the voter registration list. In my letter, I also stated there were other boards, commissions and committees of the city for which they might be interested in applying. Some applications note interest in other boards, commissions and committees in addition to their desire to be appointed to the Personnel Board. DOES COUNCIL WISH TO CONSIDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE PERSONNEL ARBITRATION BOARD? PERSONNEL ARBITRATION BOARD (Board has Full Commission Powers) Charles Bailie, DDS P.O. Box 661 Kenai, AK 99611 283-7796 (home) 283-4857 (work) Mike Baxter 502 South Main Kenai, AK 99611 283-9929 James A. Krein 1517 Fathom Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-5221 (home) 776-6793 (work) Ron Malston 1109 Fourth Avenue Kenai, AK 99611 283-5224 (home) 283-4966 (work) Marj O'Reilly 1611 Toyon Way Kenai, AK 99611 283-4946 (home) 283-2600 (work) Richard A. Ross 145 Nevada Place Kenai, AK 99611 283-7984 (home) Robert L. Seymour 607 Laurel Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-3315 (home) Eileen Bryson 1205 Third Avenue Kenai, AK 99611 283-4428 (home) 776-5575 (work) (11/l/96) CITY OF KENAI It Oil CCZ JZd� 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 TELEPHONE FAX 907- F CITY OF KENAI BACKGROUND AND PERSONAL DATA - CANDIDATES FOR TO COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS 74&SizG. n OCT z a �ss�lTl' !vQ T'Y CLERK DATE: ��; 1 1996 NAME: "awb G- 5/716 C A,) Resident of the City of Kenai? �es How long? 514ce /�,F111, Residence Address // F 1�A-/0,4 D2 . Ale.y,A- / Mailing Address '5'0- e Telephone No. 96 7- ZJ?3 -%S-3 Business Address PO 90-X 677 R6?V,l1 Telephone No. 9o7-zd3 - s237 EMPLOYER: 56ZF f STAi� or //CAS.�A I cJ,/dccJoo� Job Title PO/ er4l ,;176✓2 NAME OF SPOUSE: -7204y Current membership in organizations: /lbT A C/v(i '' ' em';1 e / '9 vy - Past organizational memberships: T P12eti�[.�f �0 9,.e GS 14SJo ci.o 1/oq COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED: /�E/ZSoiyiJFC �R�s�reAno� BoA2y ?614A 11V6- 4 Zv•Jii✓y E leec/tea iovj i WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? Gjot4.hyf 14Z woelevl ole, Alml CITY OF KENAI 11 &1 Caf � aj 4LI" 11 210 FiDALGO AVE., SURE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 ` TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 overri CITY OF KENAI RECEIVED BACKGROUND AND PERSONAL DATA - CANDIDATES FOR APPOI TO COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS OCT 2 8 1 ffi DATE: 111 T KENAI CITY CLERI NAME• • \1 �� How long? I�� rs Resident of the Ci y<of KKenai? 1 g Residence Address JCS -I �lrl L`Q6la Mailing Address ����[ /'n Telephone No. ao 3 �I ( L Business Address %a)c� I ra ,K Telephone EMPLOYER: ��) i ,�lC /`-t /Gt S� �� ,/'TIC <kzl Job Title NAME OF SPOUSE: Current membership in organizations: Past organizational memberships: COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED: 0 WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? V1 CITY OF KENAI 11 oil 4z"Im If 210 FiDALGO AVE, SC1iTE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99511-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283.7MS FAX 907-29"014 tw! .►coon CITY OF KENAI 1II, BACKGROUND AND PERSONAL DATA - CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT TO %C014KITTEES AND COMMISSIONS DATE: Id NAME: Resident of the dity of Renai? How long? Residence Address Mailing Address Telephone No. ' GQ eis,. Business Address gp /f/, Telephone No. EMPLOYER: L(r 23,57) � Job Title &cI,Od/ NAME Or SPOUSE: 1Y�1�1- Current membership in organizations: // ' A , n /l - ' -A-_ L-/ Past organizational memberships: COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED: WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE 12MOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? S Z -d "O?JA NdVV'9 5661-9Z-9 d 'a, '' Resident of the City of Kenai? ! How long? Residence Address Mailing Address 9,qmnta:: Telephone No. Business Address A) ox) tLr Telephone No. EMPLOYER: K r= 1-1 /-� 6 a Job Title I /J NAME OF SPOUSE: L //✓7I� r Current membership in organizations: og A1�,- -cky Past organizational memberships: COMMITTEES ORJ COMMISSI//ONS WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED:, //IN WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? Resident Of Us C;.ty of Xenai? Yes s Sow long? 20 years SQsidence Address 695 Poplar Kenai AK 99611 Mailing Address PO Box 2987 Kenai, AK 99611 Telephone NO. 283-3269 Busi11*Hs Address 11408 Kenai Spur Highway Telephone No. 283-3585 ]=LOY=: Firs Job Title Assistant Vice President MM Or SPOUSE: N/A Cnrramt membership in organizations: Kenai Peninsula Softball Association - Executive Board past organizational memberships: Junior Achievement of Alaska Soroptimist Intl of Twin Cities COXXXTTZZO OR COXHISSION6 YN WSICH YOU ARE IR'I'EAEBTED: Personnel Arbitration Board, Parks & Recreation Commission W8Y DO YOU WA= TO BE INVOLVED WITH TStB COXXXSS2oN OR C0XHXTT8E? I have 15 years experience in employee/employer relations. Being both an employee and supervisor, I feal capable of reaching an unbiased position based on the facts. I believe it important that this panel be available to resolve any conflicts between the City and it's employee's. tur a CITY OF KENAI rr Oil C:apiildi l/ ril1,a, ItC` rr 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 ~ TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ FAX 907-283-3014 trft2l WWWOOR CITY OF KENAI ' I I (1 1": BACKGROUND AND PERSONAL DATA - CANDIDATES FOR TO COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS DATE: Resident of the City of Kenai? Residence Address Z! I ) u I v s How 1 III AWI KI Mailing Address �` 6C Telephone No. Z 6 3 - 3338 Business Address �oLJOJA4 Telephone No. Z '1 ! l 1 EMPLOYER: PTI tiv� Job Title LAj fig r iti was n N S u NAME OF SPOUSE: Current membership in organizations: �Ll N i ca P1 a-- oyy- p Past organizational memberships: COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU AREnINTERESTED-7 1/11 / -r 1 l L ` WHY /DO -YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION �OR COMMITTEE? h t vy✓ Sig ure to"C--1 CITY OF KENA ' ►► Gd 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 kylym *Awaann �1111r 1992 MEMORANDUM To: Carol Freas, Cit Clerk From: Richard Ross Date: October 17, 1996 RE: Arbitration Panel - Resignation RECEIVED OCT 17W KENAI CITY CLERK I no longer qualify to serve on this panel in accordance with the requirements of KMC 23.35.032(b). As Acting City Manager, I hold a city office that absolutely bars this service. Please advise the Council of my resignation and need for replacement. RAR/kh Resident of the Citv of Kenai? �--- HOW long? �o yPi9# S Residence Address ���� �1���/� �f Ale Mailing Address �G�3 �fis/Ai�-'Ag/relephone No. Business Address /(��/1%/3iN7/: �'�� -5-1E2l/Telephone No. EMPLOYER: Job Title NAME OF SPOUSE: �J67j✓ti'l/ =,PGy Current membership /i/n^•�JG/Jorganizations: �1✓/9 / ���-� � C-c�f.Q T f Past organizational memberships: ��i�i�yS i.9T. COOMMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED: WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? �� G✓CL�����'t`�G�y� /�� �y�y.� �tiNi�4-1 7U 1��/����� �/1,�� Signature MEMORANDUM TO: City Council �� FROM: Robin G. Feltman, Acting Finance Director DATE: October 30, 1996 RE: Appropriations from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance This fiscal year the Council has appropriated $60,343.66 of the unappropriated fund balance leaving $7,153,065.66. The following is a breakdown of those appropriations: June 30, 1996 Unappropriated Fund Balance $8,159,822.32 July 1, 1996 Reversal of accounts receivable ( 746,000.00) July 1, 1996 FY96 Open Purchase Orders ( 200,413.00) July 1, 1996 Balance $7,213,409.32 Ord. 1705 - Rural Fire Grant Match ( 2,000.00) Ord. 1714 - Interim City Manager Contract ( 35,000.00) Ord. 1716 - Kenai Townsite Signage Grant Match ( 3,666.66) Ord. 1722 - Dunes Project ( 19,677.00) Current Unappropriated Fund Balance $7,153,065.66 Also, $2,300 of the General Fund Contingency has been appropriated for Res. 96-82 for AML dues. INFORMATION LIST Kenai City Council Meeting of November 61 1996 1. 10/16/96 Council Meeting "To Do" List. 2. 10/24/96 D. Spence, KCHS Principal thank -you letter for assistance in resolving the Homecoming bonfire problems. 3. 1997 Games of Chance and Contests of Skill Permit Application - Kenai Chamber of Commerce. 4. 10/96 Resource Development Council, Inc., Resource Review. 5. 1997 Games of Chance and Contests of Skill Permit Application - Corporation of Our Lady of the Angels Parish. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1996 "TO DO" LIST CRGBF - Investigate ownership of softball bleachers that Cook Inlet Academy is wanting to borrow for the winter. Make sure the bleachers are owned by the city. Prepare hold -harmless agreement for use of bleachers after receiving acknowledgement of liability insurance coverage from Cook Inlet Academy. Include in agreement language that Cook inlet reimburse city for any damage to the bleachers while in their use. CRG - Add section Ordinance no. 1719-96: "Not withstanding the provisions of this section, the City or State, or their agents, may operate machinery or off -road vehicles in otherwise prohibited areas for maintenance, repair, cleaning and upkeep." ADMIN - Prepare an ordinance to transfer funds (for next packet) to purchase banners through the Art Guild. Investigate whether drain would be required (into sewer line) for a drinking fountain to be placed at Memorial Park. HS/MK - Request P&Z to consider changing code to require notification to adjacent property owners of home occupation permit applications. MK - Cancel 11/27 and 12/25 Planning & Zoning Commission meetings. Change regular meeting date and time of the Historic District Board to every third Monday at 5:30 p.m. KW - Cancel Harbor Commission meeting regularly scheduled for 11/11/96 (approved by council). CLF - Send out required notices for Board of Adjustment Hearing for November 6, at 7:00 p.m. FIN - Adjust CLF salary to $52,000 a year, retroactive to July 1, 1996. RF - Prepare a list of all expenditures approved by council out of General Fund (over and above that which was budgeted) since the adoption of the budget and what would be needed to balance the budget. KK - Get something in writing from DOT in regard to Forest Drive reconstruction. KENAI CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 9583 Kenai Spur Hwy. - Kenai, Alaska 99611 (907)283-7524 FAX (907) 283-3230 October 24, 19 13"', Jt/­1 Principal Hank Overturf Assistant Principal Craig Jung Athletic Director Dawn Thorpe Activity Director TO: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue Suite 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 SUBJECT: Letter of Appreciation Dear Keith, RECEIVED OCT 2 8 1996 J,KENA1 CITY CLERK On behalf of Kenai Central High School, I would like to thank you, the City of Kenai and the Kenai Fire Department for all of your assistance in helping us to resolve the problems related to this year's Homecoming bonfire. Your willingness and patience in exploring options with us for remedying this situation was greatly appreciated. I sometimes feel like one of those neighbors we've all had; continually knocking on your door asking to borrow one of your tools. Please convey my gratitude to Assistant Fire Chief Jason Elson, Fire Marshall Scott Walden and City Engineer Jack La Shot for taking time out of their busy schedules to meet with me. The joint efforts provided by all of you will be long -remembered at our school. I feel we are indeed fortunate to live in such a community where our municipal agencies set the example of public- spirited service and active involvement with the schools. Again, we thank you for your unselfish donation of resources and manpower. If ever we can repay this debt in some small measure, we would tl-c opportunity. inc rely, Dave Spence, Principal Kenai Central High School cc: v Mayor John Dr. Walter Williams, City of Kenai Bromenschenkel, Superintendent, KPBSD HOME OF THE KARDINALS Permit Alaska Department of Revenue Charitable Gaming Division P.U. Box 110440 Juneau, AK 99811-0440 Games of Chance and Contests of Skill PERMIT APPLICATION AS . 0 Please read the instructions before cowleting Aii wliiatfiw- n FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit Number Cate of Issue This edition sponsored ty Cook Inlet Region, Inc. _`~ t _ x October 2.. 96 _,_.- -mo t1 pu cation o e esource An agreement:.orked out in Washington. D C.. ,his Month mavnave spared Ketchikan Pulp Company s two sawmiils in Southeast Alasxa. � ur a v.on t prevent the shut down of the pulp mill with the ioss of about 500 jobs. RELE,VED A ska's last W21WE,Pulp mill KE"A""' set to close New accord may save sawmills Given the Clinton administrations refusal to restore the original terms cf Ketchikan Pulp Company's (KPC) timber supply contract, Alaska s remaining pulp mill Nill close next Marcn. However. based on a last min- ute ccmorcmise between the White House and Senator Frank Murkowski. KPC will enter into immediate negotia- ,ions with the Department of Agriculture to determine the feasibility of continuing to r.:n its two sawmills in Southeast Alas -,a for two more years. Mark A. Suwyn. Chairman ana CEO _ uisiana-Pacific Corporation. said the recision to close the pulp mill was An Octoberaccorrl berNeen the White House and Senator Frank r,fLrkowski will &sect the sorest Service to sueply enough timber to maintain KPC's two sawmills in Southeast 41aska for two years. Pictured at the Waro Cove sawmill is KPC's Steve Connelly. forced on the company by the federal government's unwillingness to restore critical and essential terms of KPC's original long-term timber supply con- tract. Wholesale changes to the con- tract were unilaterally imposed by the U.S. Forest Service following passage of the Tongass Timber Reform Act (TTRA) in 1990. and resulted first in diminished profitability followed more recently by progressively larger operat- ing losses at KPC. President Clinton had said that he would veto legislation drafted by Murkowski and Congressman Don Young that sougnt to correct the inequi- ties of the 1990 TTRA and the Forest Service's administration of the contract. (Continued to page 4) Oil and gas OCS lease sales consistent with Alaska Task Force recommendations The Minerals Management Service (MMS) released its proposed Final Pro- gram for Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing for 1997-2002. Beginning August 1996. there is a 60-day review by Congress and the President. after which the Sec- retary of Interior can approve a Finai Program. All of the scheduled Alaska saies are consistent with the AlasKa Re- gional Stakeholders Task Force -e- commendations. The Task Force was established by the Secretar✓ of Inte- rior in response to an OS Policy The Resource Development Council (RDC) is AlasKa s largest privately funded nonprofit economic devecc- ment organization working to develop AlasKa s natu- ral resources in an orderly manner and !o create a broad -based, diversrfied economy while protectng and enhancing the environment Executive Committee Officers es,aent .............................. Scott L. , norscr. Sr. Vice President .................. Allen Bingnam Vice President ........................John Sturgeon Secretary .............................. Geraid G. Boom Treasurer ............................. Michaei E. Stone Past President ._................. Elizabeth Renscn Staff Executive Director ..................... (Becky L. Gay Communications Director..... Carl R. Portman Soeciai Assistant Finance ._.. Judie Schneiter Soeciai Assistant .......................... Craig Lyon Resource Review is the official monthly publication of the Resource Deveiooment Council. P,DC .s o- cated at 121 W. Fireweed. Suite 250. Anchorage. AK 99503.. (907) 276-0700. Fax: 276-3887. RDC's e-mail address: rdc@aonline.com Material in the publication may be repnntedwithout permission provided appropriate credit is given. Writer & Editor Cart Portman :�ommittee recommendation. Mem- bers include representatives of Fed- eral. State and local governments: Native. commercial fishing, subsis- ance users: environmental interests with Greenpeace allowed a minority --port): industry and development communities: and coastal districts in Alaska. According to MMS. the outer conti- nental shelf (OCS) accounts for about one-fourth of U.S. natural gas produc- -ion and one sixth of oil production. The OCS is believed to hold one-half of the indiscovered. conventionally recover- able oil and gas resources estimated to -emain in this country. Nevertheless. oniyfive of fifteen plan- -ting areas in Alaska made the S-year ease sale schedule. Eleven sale are cheeuled for the Gulf of "Mexico. Areas may later be removed from consideration. out new areas cannot be added to the schedule once it is finalized. The Proposed Final Program for AlasKa for 1997-2002 '.includes lease offerings in the following five areas: the Beaufort Sea in 1998 and 2000 (first a small sale limited to near shore from east of Colville River to west of Barter island and then a limited number of blocks adjoining near shore State waters east of Barter Island); Cook Inlet in 1999 (excludes areas near Kamishak and Kachemak Bays. the Barren Islands and Shelikof Strait); Gulf of Alaska in 2001 and Chukchi Sea and Hope Basin in 2002. (excludes near shore Chukchi Polynya and most of southern Hope Basin.) The Task Force considered includ- ng the notably-cisputed North Aleutian sale. then took it off the list recognizing is continued unsettled status Just because the program de- scribes when and where MMS will con- sider holding lease sales in the future does not mean a sale will automatically occur. Sites will be considered for possible lease sale only after continued consultation ,vith the state and local governments. area communities ane industry, and only after the preparatior of a draft and final Environmental Im- pact Statement (EIS). A document entitled `Sustainable Energy Strategy," guides the Clinton Administration's energy policy. This na- tional energy plan has three strate goals: 1. Maximize energy productivity to strengthen the economy and improve living standards: 2. Prevent pollution to reduce the adverse environmental im- pacts associated with energy proauc- ,ion, delivery, and use: ana 3. Keep America secure by reducing vuinerabii- ity to global energy market shocKs. MMS's own investigation of energy alternatives and market responses to curtailment of OCS leasing indicated that 86% loss of oil production and 34 1. reduced gas production would be re- placed by oil imports. It is hard to get the public excited about news of the next five year off- shore program. Maybe it is because there is no production from any federal OCS lease offshore Alaska to date. Or maybe it is because most Alaskans would prefer a vigorous on -shore Fed- eral leasing program. like safely on the coastal plain of ANWR. Instead. the Clinton Administration prefers to Su -- port off -shore America. Let us hope oil industry is equally interestea wher , comes time to bid. iBecKy Gay is a member of the Alaska Regional Stake- noiaers Tasx Force.) Page .2 RESOURCE REVIEW .' October ' 996 Murkowski's bill seeks needed clarifications to ANILCA As usual there is no shortage cf critical issues facing Alaska's basic in- dustries these days. There are many Outsiders who wish to stop Alaska s economy in its hacks or wish to restrict access to AlasKa s land base. ','!e neec ' work together as Alaskans to ove- come these formidable challerces. One of the ore pressing curren' issues facing Alaska is ANILCA and some of the unreasonable restrictiors that piece of legislation has placed on Alaskans. Senator MurkowsKi s )rking on legis'ation to address sorre ,r the problems caused by ANILCA. Problems have developed since the passage of the Act because weil- intentioned federal managers are forces to make difficult decisions interpreting broad or amciguous language. Murkowski's prcoosai seeks 'e c,arify parts of the Act'c guarantee the original, intent of Congress is carried cut. When ANILCA was passed. there were assurances made in the biil. through what is commonly known as the 'no more" clause, that there would be no additionai land withdrawn into restricted classrications. The Clinton administration ras shown that it does not intend to honor that part of the law, as evidenced by its attempt to create more big 'T' 'Nilderress in ANWR. Senator Murkowski's proposal includes a provision to address '.his problem. Access is another problem. There are many ,vays that ANILCA limits or completely iiminates access by Alaskans to traditional hunting grounds. �ishing resources and ether areas. Because access is so difficult in Alaska. large tracts of land can be placed completely off limits by not allowing access by boats. airplanes or snowmachines. By closing one stretch of river, federal iand managers can cut off hunting for entire regions no recourse. Another big problem lies in Title XI access provisions. Title XI applies to 'ransportation and utility systems in and across conservation units and establishes guidelines and procedures for submitting and processing applications forthosetransportation and utility systems. In 1983. the Department of Interior proposed comprehensive regulations to implement Title XI. Final ,egulationswerechallenced by Trustees "Your support is needed for this legislation. There are powerful Outside interests that will be fighting for more restrictive land management policies." 'or Alaska in 1987. and a number of parties, including RDC, intervened in the case. The Department today has released a proposed rule to revise and simplify the regulations. Murkowski's proposal seeks to provide additionai emedies to the access problems. Hunters. trappers, sportfishers and recreational ists are not assured that 'hey can continue to enjoy Alaska's wild ands. Under ANILCA. decisions on What can be done and what must rot be done in Alaska's outdoors will be made n Washington. D.C. Most Alaskans !ive here to experience the freedom ct oeing in the wilderness and ANILCA is a threat to that lifestyle. For more information on the soecif- cs of the bill. or if you want to add your two cents worth. please contact Murkowski's office and drop a note tc Congressional leaders and the Rresi- dent to voice your strong support. RDC briefed on Tongass transfer bill Members c= RDC's board of direc- tors were briefed recently on iegislatior introduced by Congressman Don Young that would allow the State of Alaska tc take control of the Tongass Nationai -orest. Duane Gibson of the House Natu- ral Resources Committee of whim Young is chair. oted that in two public hearings held so far on the iecislaticn the issue has come down to a philo- sopn,cai debate on government from afar, the ability of local communities to manage their resources and whether the promise of statehood for Alaska has been achieved. Young says he introduced the bill because the Forest Service has mis- manages the forest and is largely re- sponsible for the 40 percent reduction in the reoion s timber industry employ- ment. Young noted that decisions over logging have shifted from local deci- sion -makers to Washington, D.C., poii- ticians pandering to powerful environ- mental lobbies. "My bill unlocks the Tongass from is federal shackles." Young said. !' gives Alaskans freedom. It gives us control." Gibson said Young will continue tc -efine his bill and more hearings will be held next year. Octccer 1996 RESOURCE REVIEW / Page Fate of timber industry, thousands of jobs hang in the balance !Continued from page U The ieaislaticn .vould also have ex- tended the restored contract b,' 5 years. Under pressure from the White House. the KPC provision was dreopec from the Omnibus Parks Bill passed in the final days of the 104th Congress. just adjourned. Faiiina a legislative solution. *"e company actively sought a negotiated settlement .vith the administration. a September 18 meeting with Agricuiture Secretary Dan Glickman. the company proposed a plan ?hat viouicl close .ne pulp mill but retain enough L,mber tc permit its two sawmills to continue cc- erating. The response to that propcsai came in a letterfrom Secretary Glickman dated October 3 in which he agreee to "begin discussions immediately so that we may resolve these issues. while orc- viding strong and meaningful support for the people and communities of Southeast Alaska. Suwyn indicated the company rag alreaciv been in touch with the Depar- mentcf Agriculture to begin negotiations. which he said needed to be cenc,uaea it the next 30-45 days. "Providing aceauate timber supplies are mace avaiia'ble at a reasonable price. KPC will keep the saw- mills running," "e said. Speaking about the closure of the pulp mill. Suwyn said the company had no choice. In addition to current oper- ating losses of between S5 and S10 mil- lion a month. we were required to spend more than S2 million a month to accom- plish environmental and productivity upgrades." Suwyn said. "We simply could not afford these continuing losses and capital outlays in the face of the Clinton administrations opposition to any compromise that would allow the pulp mill to operate profitably." The pulp mill closure will affect 500 KPC employees. The company expects to maintain a 1997 work force of about 400 to operate sawmills and harvestinc operations unless they, too, are forced to shut down ov the administration. The e000sition in Congress against the contract extension was led by 1R) Rep. Sherwood Boehlert. ,vhose state of New York cuts more tan 1 billion board feet of timber annually to teed 34 operating pulp mills and 231 sawmills. In comparison. Alaska has one pulp mill that is on the verge of closure and 30 small sawmills. Approximately 250 million board feet of timber was harvested from the Tongass in 1995. Suwvn said that Louisiana-Pacific end KPC :,ouwdcontinuetopressclaims -cainstthe Forest Service for breach of entract. acme of these issues are cur -ently the subject of suits filed in the J.S. Cour c` Fecerai Claims which seek excess cf S200 million. I_-P expects -o file substantiai additional claims .n -ne future. MurkC':;sK; said he hopes the government s negotiations with the ompany are productive. He pledged to aggressively monitor the process. "We rave fought Iona and hard on ,his issue.''Aurkowski pointed out. "For the working men and women of Ketcnikan and Prince of Wales Island. this agreement offers a ray of hope that they will have jobs and the basis for a /ear -round economy ,�iiil remain in Southeast Descite tie agreement. Governor Tony Kno:�ies expressed concerns about families and businesses affected by the impending transition. 'Even if the sawmills remain in operation. a decision by LP to close their pulp mill will put hun- dreds of Ketcnikan residents out of work," Knowles said. "This remains a major con- cern for my administration. While we will work to create a viable, sustainable tim- ber industry as part of Ketchikan's fu- ture. we wont forget those who are most affectee by this transition.' The existing long-term contract. ,vhich expires in 2004. obligates the company to operate a pulp mill. but the closure of the pulp plant would almost certainly trigger cancellation of the con- tract. In 1994. the Forest Service can- ceied a similar contract held by Alaska Pulp Corporation after that company closea its Sitka pulp miil. KPC has been seeking the ' 5-year extension to its long-term contract to amortize S200 million in environmental and safety upgrades requirea at its pulp mill. KPC z cvides 300o of Ketcnikan s payroll ana more than 1.000 year- round. high -wage iobs in the region,;. Its demise ,would devastate the region's timber industry which em- ploys about 2,000 people. The pulp mill is critical to the entire timber in- dustry because it takes low -quality logs. harvested with high -quality tip ber, and does value-added rnanufL `wring to make a pulp product used in a variety of consumer products. Although high -quality timber can be used to make lumber and other high - end wooc products. the puio mill is needed for the low -end wood. Without the puip miil. 'harvesting will be iimitee -o selective Togging of only the high - end trees with a lot of timber left behina ;hat might otherwise have been harvested. Environmentalists say the new ac- cord signals the beginning of the end to the last long-term contract In the Tongass. They claim the contract pro- motes clear-cut logging, which they say is a threat to wildlife. fish and tourism. But with two-thirds of the forested lands in the Tongass closed to logging. fish, wildlife and tourism thrive. House Speaker Gail Phillips. an out- spoken advocate for jobs and families. noted that President Clinton must under stand that this issue is not just poIi+' fodder. out critical to the lives of r Alaskans. She explained that "no amount of relief can replace the dignity of having a job ana supporting your family." Page 4 RESOURCE REVIEW October'. 96 Unlike Alaska's struggling -'tuber industr•.,. the state's mining sector 's healthy and expanding with new discoveries, icreasea expieratien budgets ana more deveicpmer.*. The Rea Dog 'ead and zinc mane Nonnvwest AlaKa is exeardina. -'-e Fort Knox cold mine near FaircanKs s pushing forwa-c despite cost C%,erruns ane the Greens Creek sliver mmne near Juneau is a, east three months area-_ of schedule r initial start-up. The total value of production arc the sum of exoloratien and deveicc- ment expenditures in 1995 totaiee S719 million. up 23 serpent from the S583.5 million total for 1994. Exploraticn ex- enaitures in 1995 crew 10 percent'_ S34 million and mineral development levelsumped from S44.9 million n 1994 to S148 million in 1995. an increase CT 234 percent. Mill expansion ;.ork ai Red Dog and construction at the Fort Knox and I' 'xcn ForK goid ac- counted for 86 oercent of the tctai 1995 state•:vicie ceveiopment axperc:,ures. Gross vaiue of Alaska's —rnera. production was S537 million. uo 6 Per- cent from 1994. Two factors :vere re- sponsible for much of the production increase. a 15 percent increase in leap and zinc concentrates Trom the giant Rea Dog znc-lead-siiver mine anc a recap 1.640.000 tons of coal proauc- tion from Usibelli Coal mine. The mining industry provided an estimated 3.406 direct. full-time .obs it 1995. an increase of 323 from the pre- vious vear. Most of the acded iccs were attributed to mill expansion activities at Rea Dog, Nixon Fork ana Fort Knox. Major exploration projects cccurrea throughout the Northwest Arctic. 'he Seward Peninsula. the Kuskokwim region. Soutreast Alaska anc every places in the FairbanKs area this summer. 7-1is nigh level of exc.cratjon 'Years of work are ,3ulminating in new mines -hat create new ;'obs and ,2ccnomic development." Steve Boreil ,Alaska Miners Association _ctwlty �Is a strong indication of the ^creased cc-fidence the ndustry has .or doing business in Alaska. noted Steve Bore!l. Executive Director of the Alaska Miners Association. -Years of work are cuirninating in ^ew mines 'hat create new iobs and --coromic development." said Borell. Over the cast six years. 'l-e Legisia- -ure nas made more than a dozen nances 'hat have c'arifiec iaws. re -unnecessary risk. ana improvea -ne c_ererai business climate for mining.' Boreil creaitedthe Alaska Congres- siorai Delegation. the Kncvwies admin- strat on and the Legislature for seeing -he need for diversification of the Alaska economy and taking the necessary steps to improve the business climate. But mining companies investing hun- dredsof millions of dollars in Alaskawarn that despite promising geology and the ;lurry of activity on big mining deposits. Alaska projects have been slow to show a profit because of enormous ,nfrastruc- -ure and other development costs. All -hree of Alaska's major mines — Red Dog. Greens Creek and Fort Knox — have challenging problems to overcome. out thanKs to the size and strength of the comoanies involved. those ventures are -nov!na fcr,vard. With an S80 million expansion moerway. Comrnco is transformina Red Dog into the world's largest lead -zinc .1 irh an �80 ,miiien expansion ur,cenvay. �_;;minco is rrans,'crm;ng Rea Doc arc the .vond's largest 'ead-zinc mine. Fee ,wog is ocareo in Nora, west AlasKa ana a a ,-naior aiemenr rn the reeron s econcmv. -nine. With higher production and !ower .snit costs. the company hones to create a margin of profit at Red Dog, something t has been unable to do %pith the repressed zinc prices of the past several years. The Greens Creek mine snouid be operating by the end of the year. accordire 'o Clint Naumar. -nine -nanager for Kennecctt Greens CreeK ":lining Comoanv. which Is currently in a Mart -up mode ceTore Tull -time oceration. The mine vvill erocess about 1.320 tons of ore per day and yield about 1 1 million ounces of silver per year. makirg it the argest single silver producer in the U.S. Amax Gold. the developer 'or the Fort Knox. is looking at nearly a 50 percent increase in its original cost to bring the gold mine near Fairbanks into operation. The latest capital costs for 'he proiect are S370 million. P,'ucn of .he Fort Knox problem has to do with geotechnical croblems with soils below tailings impoundment dams. requiring more excavation and construction. The Jonesville underground coal 'nine near Sutton is expected to start seilina ;ts product this month. accordina -o Nerox Power Systems Inc. T! e mine s expected to reach full proauction of µ00.000 tons a year in 1997. Octccer 1996 RESOURCE REVIE';'d Page RDC's )November conference to focus on Alaska's ability to attract investment capital Mark calendar for November 21-22 The global market is competitive. but that's where capital circulates. and that's where Alaska's resource developers. producers and service providers must compete in order to thrive. Alaska's ability to attract invest- ment capital to develop and transport its natural resources. goods and ser- vices is the next big challenge for the -19th state. Questions must be asked and an- swered about Alaska s ability to en- hance its regulatory and political cli- mate so new investors can be attracted. How can Alaska overcome barriers and encourage new investment? How does Alaska's risk -reward profile shape up against international projects that are competing for the same pool of limited capital? What vAl it take to convince international investors ,hat Alaska is ready to compete for investments? To find out. attend RDC's 17th An- nuai Conference on Alas.Ka s Resources November 21-22 at the Captain Cook Hotel. "Sharpening Alaska s Competitive Edge: Competing for Capital in a Global Economy," will focus on how Alaska businesses can compete for capital. RDC .vill offer timely updates on Pacific Rim markets and how new international ventures will affect Alaska's success in securing capital. To complement the private sector and financial perspectives. state and federal decision -makers will outline Alaska's approach to global competition. And Governor Knowles new economic development initiative -- Marketing Alaska -- will show how the private sector fits into the overall plan. And since many key investment decisions are dictated by action at the Congressional level. `here will be a specific analysis of how the 1997 Con- gress can be expected to deal vvith ssues such as the Mining Law, Encian- :ered Species Act reform. wetlands -eguiation. property rights legislation. Tongass .ogging and ANWR. RDC conferences feature the All - Alaska Expo. as well as gourmet breaks. unchecns and networking opportunities. Governor Tony Knowles will present :ne Thursday keynote luncheon address vhiie Eiil Horn, a former Interior Depart- -nent officiai ro,,v specializing in Alaska and arc federal regulatory issues. .vill evaluate the November election at the =riday iuncheon. Confirmed speakers as of October include FranK Ingrassia. Goldman Sachs & Company, New York; Richard Strutz. President, National Bank of AlasKa: Jeff Getter. Dames & Moore- _ondon. John Morgan, BP Exploration Alaska) Inc.. Ron Duncan. GCI; Jerry DeFrancisco. AT&T Alascom: Robert Loescr,er. Seaiaska Corporation; Tim Geiken. UPS: Tom Dow. Princess -ours: uohn Olson. AIDEA: Ken Vassar. Nonifonh. Ardetsmger. Johnson & Brecn,: *ormer Governor Walter J. Hickei: Robert Beaver, Sealand Sery ces: Unalaska Mayor Frank Kelty: Michael Gough, CATO Institute: Commissioner Michele Brown, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation: Dr. Les Williams. Foster ,Vheeier Environmental Corporation: Frank Vertuccc. ENSR Corporation: Randy Smith. EPA: Scott Thompson. Alaska Power Systems, John Key, Cominco Alaska. Inc.. and Harry Noah. the Noan Group. Invited is Mark Suwyn, Louisiana Pacific Corporation. RDC members and others are en- couraged to register for the conference before November 1 for an early -bird -egistrauon rate of S1 SO. Special spon- sorships rates.:vnich include registra- tions. are also available. Call RDC for additional information at 276-0700. RDC asks for new TLMP revision Because of serious flaws in the Tongass Land Management Plan (TLMP) revision. RDC has joined the Alaska Forest Association and other organizations throughout Alaska in asking the Forest Service to rewrite the controversial plan. In comments to the federal agency in August. RDC asked the Forest Service to withdraw the re- vised TLMP, correctthe miscalcula- tions in the timber harvest estimates and issue a new revision for public comment. Inaccuracies in the tim- ber harvest numbers have made it difficult for RDC, other organiza- tions and individuals to comment knowledgeably on the plan. Alternatively, RDC suggested the Forest Service sign the Februar 1993 Record of Decision. That pla, . represents a much more balanced management approach relative to the whole Tongass. It clearly reflects better science than the current draft. Of the alternatives in the cur- rent draft. Alternative 2 was the most balanced. Alternative 2 proposes a level of timber harvesting consis- tent with historical use of the Tongass. Alternative 2 would pre- cipitate no viability crisis for any Tongass species and would pro- vide for a sustainable yield and multiple use for all forest users. The Preferred Alternative, which RDC strongly opposes, restrictstim- ber harvest more than is necessary to protect the environment. The Pre- ferred Alternative would place addi- tional lands off limits to harvesting, further upsetting the balance that presently exists between preserva- tion and development. The TLMP Revision, as proposed, will wipe o' many of the compromises and u, derstandings eached under Tongass Timber Reform Act. Page 6 ; RESOURCE REVIEW/October 1996 Heritage tourism here to stay The visa ear;ier tnis year of Debar✓ Sec-etary 'he nterior -.;nr. Garamenai tc ' e as: of the lanes a. the first .vas a o-eatn cf fresh air;c -ea! AlasKars ^.c -ave ;✓atchec clenched teein the cast 15 years as federal adrrir stratcrs regulates '--ca, land owners and discouragea ::ark visitors seek na access and circuiatcn their Alas.�a carK and refuge arcs Stablishea 1980. Our thanks to Mr. (3aramendl =rid his partnersnic vision for the future of Alaska! The _.S. Department o� .he Interior administers the National Par,, Sernce. U.S. = sir ane Wildlife Service. Bureau of 'Lana Management. J.S. Geo�ccical S..n ev ana several other resource-o­entec agencies. none of Nhicn have tracrticnaily viewed them- selves as I: a;,ers in 'ne heritage cur ism naustr.. = ttituces change sov) v' The U.S. Departmentof the Interior officiai has kedged to make federal agencies Tore user-friendly" ana 'c encourage cartnersn,ps between oub- !ic ana private sectors of the tourism industr✓, mairiv to help government make more Toney. The ventage 'curismnaustry s debenaent aeon western federa lands and nationai barks. which generate billions of doilars for local communities outside Alaska. National parks are internationai visitor destinations. a face veil known 'o AlasKans .vho nave watched lance rierraticnais dominate the tourism scene since 1980. For the cast t:vo decades. the Re- source Deve.cbmeni Council has pro- motea wise development. RDC has en- couragea planning and development of • isitor'nfrasmuctures and tourism fac,ii- ,;es. Through its Tourism Division. RDC's coal has been to complement coopera- ve tourism between state. federal and ocai entities. Since ANILCA. RDC staff ana scecial ccmmirtees have reviewed ana ccmmentea on, major federal land Manning documents prepared by the 'nter!or Department. RDC has been sup- conive or the cartnership linkage idea. In 1982. RDC promoted the first uubiic private cartnership between the Mate of AlasKa. ^Jationai Park Sernce ana private sector ,ourism interests on -ne south s-ae cf Mt. McKinley. with roccsed deve,ebments within Denali Mate ParK. Jnforunately. numerous fforts atcoccerativeplanning have failed. RDC has along -term involvement ,nth South Deraii planning. While it has 'esufied at cubiic hearings, RDC -,as never been invited to directly partici- pate on planning. Only when govern- ments demonstrate wijlingnessto share Nith each other will private sector in- ✓estmeni become realized. RDC recognizes and supports the ✓ital nterface between state. feaeraj and private sectors. that triad of mutual partners wnicn bunt the Trans -Alaska Pipeiine ane other significant projects. So wny cant they link up for tourism ,eve,opment? It is no mere coincidence that *hematic tour elements of the Heritage Tourism ,aciustry involve scenery, midlife. geology. history and culture. Nith some unique outdoor recreation thrown into the potpourri of human experiences. This menu did not emerge =rom feoerai agency operations. butfrom state ana private industry which has marketed ana promoted Alaska's Great _ana themes. ,vorjdwide. since 1975. The beauty of these themes is that thev complement intrinsic value sys- -ems idennfied ,vitnin state and feaerai units across tie state. Complementary communication systems which integrate 'ne :ntrinsic values of significant re- source units are common ground for pudic and crivate investment. A triad of state, federal and private sector cart- nerships can accomplish mutually ben- eficial goals once they set the vision. Resource nteroretation and multiple experience use by visitors is value-added product for the Heritage Tourism industry. It is education about ntrinsic values of our vital resources ,vhich form the foundation of our prouq state. '.ts conservation lands ana emerging tourism industry. It is our eeends of the landscape that form the -ucleus cf future nemage tourism exoeriences ana the potential for crivate sector nvolvement in marketing commonaities. Government reeds a new resource management strategy which places people and not 'things' into the central equation! Resource agencies forget *-.at visitors are most important natural and cultural resources! People are seen as problems in national parks and not as potential solutions' With good resource education programs supported by private industr✓, customers will come -o better understand both tangible ana ntangible value systems at worK SImUl- 'aneously vithin these environments. Strategies must emerge centerec around resource Interpretation of our scenery. ,vildlife. history and culture. They should focus on the muitjpie ex- oerience use of parK lands and not on chysical abuse of lands. Both private industry and government have the same :ping in common —.he need to win the hearts and minds of visiting publics. Successful partnerships in the future viil involve "things'' or destinations so much as they will involve people's positive memories and multiple experiences use options. In Alaska. the destination is not as important as the experiences visitors enjoy along the way. Creative oartnerships centered around is market truth will have tremendous success: (Don Foiiows is a tourism _onsuitant and small business owner. /n ,e 1970s. ne neioee cefine ANfLCA) Octccer 1996 RESOURCE REVIEW Page , Unique and Diverse arc 11,0111 ILI XT \Vith C,2'-1S1% C C 1 111 ICI J- 7 Jnd !,Jrci p rc c rvi n cT o i -ir -uiLuiit ss and -Ii:C 77'-7L1CP'-' pursuill- CIRI Cook Inlet Region, Inc. Resource Deveiopment Cjunc;: 121 W Fireweed. Suite 250 Ancncrace, AK 99503 ADDRESS C:DRREC7!--N REQUESTED Mayor John Williams City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Ave., Suite 200 Kenai AK 99611 9ulk Rate U.S P staae PAID Ancrcraoe, AK Permii No. 377 Page 8 RESOURCE REVIEW October '996 Early Bird Registration Form - $150! BEFORE Friday, November 8, 1996: Early Birc Rate: $150 As of Monday, November 11: RDC Members: $200 & Non-members: 113225 S�arpen�n Alaska's Compefif;ve Noce Corrpefin7 for Capifal in a Global Economy Thursday and Fridav, November 21 - 22. 1996 Hotel Ca7,tain Cook, .�nchoraze TO REGISTER: -Please take advantage of this special EARLY BIRD rate! -Return this form oy mail to: Resource Development Council 121 W. Fireweed Lane, Suite 250 Anchorage, AK 99503 or fax to (907)276-3887 -Fees include a S50 non-refundable processing fee; no refunds after Friday, November 1, 1996 -Participant substitution is permitted, caii RDC with changes! -For additional information. call RDC at l9071276-0700 HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS: Call the Hotel Captain COOK at (907)276-6000 for reservations. Specify "RDC Confer once" `or the best rate. The rate is $90.00 fir either a single or double. YES, I am registering for the great Early Bird Rate of S150. Please Print or Tvpe Name: Title: Company: Maiiino Address: — City: Phone: Method of Payment: Amount: e Visa/MC/A mX #:_ Expiration Date: _ State: Zip: Name: Fax: Check #: (As it appears on the credit Cara) Sponsor, Under v iter and Exhibitor rates available, call #276-0700 for more information BEFORE Friday, November 8, 1996: Early Bird Rate: $150 As of Monday, November 11: RDC Members: $200 & Non-members: $225 II(A s 1 JlII AIli 11Ili I Conlnrnllcn on Alaska's IWSourcos I_IIt1Lly. lluvulul)uI 5)lar-poninq Aknka's Com 01;1ivn FJIJO 7::10 n, Ilnillsllall(u1/(;hack In /- ( CYl1MIY fM (. 1„f,J 1( r (T.1 I 1_(.—"'j I xllll)119 ()pfm 'Lyl) Opollm, Hm-.Optlon ,UIJ(SVdY•.r14YQ(IIUd( 21._19:�t3� 11 30 a nl Illlla -,Uu(Alna Ilovnlopnlenl In till) Invosllnont CrIpIl;ll F(luall()Il ' 00 it n1- linclls(,nllon/(:heck-In luhn fAmgan, PleSM0111, HI" Expinlnllon (Alaska) Inc. Exhiblls Opon I"m I)uw• Vice I'lesidonl, Iruliic Allalrs, Irllncn5s lours, Snn(Uo. VJA 'Gyn (lponor' flocoplfon in tho exhibit moll' Iilln Ilonco, Chiol Opolaling Ol1wor. HAM flnlli(nlal Collmlalkln I.15 Aiwhomgo Wolconle• Mnyo( hick Vlysholll q .30 Illilr)vntivo ';(rlullons to I unillll(I Ilosoull o Oponk,g 13ell, iks, f3D(. Fricismolll Scott Ihorsorl 0ovolopr11e111 Ploposaf9 total Olson, ()opuly OI(octor Inr Oovalopnlnnt, AIO1=A 130 Compollnq for Capllnl: Who's Got I.nn \!n•:aa,, Hrnnl fulll l l+x (,uunsnl, Wollllolih. ArgoL;ingor, It alld Who 9 131111g1liq It Ill ,Il(lllltioll •l. fl,ll('ll I'Ielll( Iligrnnsln, Pnllllef, Ool(1111n11 Sn(.I1s & 001111ally, How Yolk, fly Fliclowd Strulz, 1'lesidorll, llallonal Bank of Alaska 1000 Hmok 115 Con1pmInU for Ctipllel: Alatil<u's fllsk Ilnwnlcl Ploliln II) 1'r I'I"'llnnlllos an(I Itnl,lalc to ►.loving Il000ul(ns tuba I(oy, Gonl)ral Mnna(101. hell Ooy Opolllllons, Conllnr,o Akl•:kn, Inl Ammid Ilse lilohn kl.11h .`;1myll• (A:O, I nlliilallil I'm l(I(; Clllp . PUIIkIIId, O11 �Illl'lhl(t� ilkv'UIII(Ir WFIIifif .I, I It( l'ol Milmll I oo6Chol, Flil:Illivo Vlcl) I'lli'ddo nl, Sunia5ka Gotpolalioll 10'.00 [31It'll( Ilnhelt Heftvef, Alnska (ionofal VIF11111gnr, Sea Innd $olvl(:es I rank Kelly, Mnyor of llnalasl(n, (ienelal Mll)1nUer, Aly"ska Senkmd; it).15 (:ontpeting for Caplinl: flow Alaskn Shapes Up Agnlnat lint t;oikful, Ilorlhv.(+•,1 I1n411()n Hu,lan:,s f-)avolnpnlonl F.1:ulnpnr, ,Ile Conlpollllon In the Ilegulnlory Arena 1I lilo(I I';urol Snlvir.os, `+:In Iln(Ilnn, (:A Joll 1 Joler, Manngat, Goidodornllt)n of In(lnpou(lonl Slnlns Operttlloos, Inlnrnallonal Olvlslon. Oarllne X Moore. 1 oll(fon. 1-rlglnrlO 12:15 - I '30 1 llday Koynolo 1 mw1loon I Inny I'loall, the Noah Gloup Evnluuling the Hovnn,ber Pleellon: Ilow Washington I1ny ()gal WlWilliAlaska In 1997 Iluon 1:30 I hurs(In Ko I unchnoll y y roll) Dill I1"Ill, Paflllflf, fill( ll, 1lolloll, Illll,lel, (.Ilmol, V1;lilrl(lglo I1, Still() of Ilia Slam: Mmkoling Aleskil Inlemirillonnily 2 00 1) AddiosslnU Ill) VIOSl ;ollous IIISk9 1list: (3ovolnol Tony Knowles (;etling the Resl log FlIVII0ll,llell(Ill tlollurs Mlr,hael (,ougll, I)ka(.tor nl Sclnncl) an(I IUsk Slufllas. 2 00 rho Stale of Ihl) Wof lfl: I ho CA I U insllluln, Wnshinglon, 1) C flenlllles of roday's 111ve9hllenl Cllmnle Paul Casclogllnnl, Floll'lns Coin, faipel, fnlwan 2. 30 Risk tinlnnl:ln(l In Illo Ilogulnioty Alnno (;unnnleslonnf Mlcl)ola Blown, Alaska Dept. Envkonnlenlal (:on;gIvallnn 2':30 Tln Fn91 1=111e1ging Wolld of 1 nlecnnununlcnllolls: n:lrl(ly Snlilll, Difoclof, Fnvkollll,nlltal ('Inanup Olficn, FPA, flegion X. rllsk9 alld flnwolcls for Aln9kn nalllo, YJA imy Onl'1nr,cisco, Pnrrl(Inni, A I R I Alwo.0111 IIuu;11d A 0uncmi, Plnsldonl, G(A 3:15 iiom nol Hoak 3:15 Oommel H,aal( Iloslod by (;(',1 3 •15 flick As9essmont: Tile Cost Honellt Annly919 Ur. I es W(Illnrns, Techl;ion1 prograln Manager, rosin! Whoolm 3:45 I.e( dhig Edge Technology and the flick flewald Profile 1'n-Ilonnlnnlal Colpornllon, Soallla, WA Scott Ihonlpson. Plesldl)nl, Alnska Powof Syslnc19 OI 1 lani( Vo(lu(icl, illsk Assns;nonll tidnnngor. I it ;I1 (:olp(nrulnil, Janlln I(enwnrll,y, Exoculivo I)Imclnl, Alnska Scion(:o A leclun,logy I oil (:nlllns, f;0 Foun(lallon `5-00 ( h;unp;lgno and "Walldillo Odol lu:l.;l i Resource Development Council 7v7i HURSDA Petroleum Club of Anchorage NEW LOCATION: 3301 "C" STREET Oct • NOV* Reserraiicns are required. Please call 276-07C0 by noon Wednesday. i Doors :,pen at 7 a.m.. presentations begin at 7:30 a.m. Members: Breakfast: $10.50, Coffee & Pastry: $5.50 Non -,Members: Breakfast: $12.00, Coffee & Pastry: $6.00 Oct. 24: The Denali Railway Y 1 System Project Overview Joe F7ets. Chairman, Kantishna Holdings Oct. 31: New Arctic Oil: The Alpine Discovery Dave S,a er, Land Manager. ARCO Alaska. nc. Nov. 7: New International Threats to Alaska Mining Generai Richard Lawson, President Alaska Mining Association Nov. 14: Privatization of the Alaska Railroad Bill Brodsky, President, Montana Rail Link Nov. 21-22: S /�aS�Cd�S C n K•• a E&e,- C 7?e • far Cepifal in a G&a! Ecorxy N RDC's 17th Annual Conference (Call RDC for more information) Hotel Captain Cook Nov. 2a: ncaypy i i iau it otjiv a iy: i,4o meei;rg J Alaska Department of Revenue Charitable Gaming Division P.O. Box 110440 Juneau, AK 99811-0440 Phone: (907) 465-2229 Games of Chance and Contests of Skill PERMIT APPLICATION AS 05.15.020 Please read the instructions before completing this application. All sections of the application must be completed NOTICE: GAMING ACTIVITIES MAY NOT BE CONDUCTED UNTIL THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. Permit FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit Number _ Date of Issue 1. NAME OF ORGANIZATION EINe'12- D 1.7, 5 5A. RENEWAL APPLICATION eC Q P, C F O C P L.4 1)i d F 77-1E Most Recent // Year O Permit Number:Issued: %a A)!o i LS ATTACH the following REQUIRED items: ❑ Current Alaska membership list (must have at least 25 members) ❑ Copy of amendments to articles of incorporation and bylaws, if any; and Mailing Address D J certificate of amendmenvinoorporatioNreinstatement. ❑ Board resolution appointing the primary member in charge of games. '12S ❑ Test answer sheet of new Primary/Altemate member in charge of games. ❑ Proof of filing the application with the city or borough where the gaming activity City, State, Zip Code � 6AA14 / i� %6 is to occur. (See instructions). ❑ Separategaming criecidrigaccount number, bankname, address and telephone number: NL 2. TYPE OF ORGANIZATION 4. TYPE OF GAMES. List by common Check one box. For definitions see name if other than those listed. See 13�ti`A T 1 - KE A1,4 f 8R A H �9as� -000bo i9�o _ j v7-Z AS 05.15.210. AS 05.210. 5B. NEWAPPUCATION ❑ a. Charitable ❑ a. Bingo NOTE: Bingo games ❑ b. Civic or Service must not be held more than Number of years organization has been in existence in Alaska: fourteen occasions in a cal- ATTACH the following REQUIRED items: ❑ c. Dog Mushers' Association endar month with no more ❑ Documentation showing organization has been in existence in Alaska three ❑ d. Educational than 35 games per session years or more (e.g. bank statements, correspondence to the organization, ❑ e. Fishing Derby Association or series of games. receipts for services rendered or supplied, etc.). / ❑ Current Alaska membership list (must have at least 25 members) ❑ 1. Fraternal Q b. Raffles & Lotteries ❑ Certified true copy of articles of incorporation, and a copy of bylaws and national ❑ Pull -Tabs and state charters. The articles of incorporation and/or bylaws must contain a ❑ g. Labor c. dissolution clause. ❑ h. Municipality ❑ d. Ice Classics ❑ Copy of IRS certificate or tax letter or tax exemption issued to nonprofit organi- ❑ i. Nonprofit Trade Association ❑ e. Dog Mushers' Contests zations, if applicable. ❑ Board resolution appointing the primary member in charge of games. ❑ j. Outboard Motor ❑ 1. Fish Derbies ❑ Test answer sheet for primary & alternate member in charge of games. Association ❑ g. Rain Classics ❑ Proof of filing the application with the city or borough where the gaming activity is to occur (see instructions)- 0 k. Police or Fire Department ❑ h. Mercury Classics ❑ Separate gaming checking account number, bank name, address and telephone and Company ❑ i. Goose Classic number: ❑ 1. Political ❑ j. Salmon Classic - Name and mailing address of National Organization (if applicable): -4'm. Religious ❑ k. Contests of Skill ❑ n. Veterans ❑ 1. Marksmanship: ❑ o. IRA/Native Village Rifle, Archery or Pistol ❑ 2. Races ESTIMATED GROSS RECEIPTS DURING 3. ORGANIZEDAS: ❑ 3. Track and Field Events PRIOR YEAR FROM ALL GAMING ACTIVITIES $ Es `f ��, ICAO `/ Gf Corporation ❑ n. Kng Salmon Classic 6S. FEE. Check the appropriate box and enclose the correct amount. ❑ Public ❑ Private ❑ o. Canned Salmon Classic If GROSS receipts from ALL prior year gaming activities were: Then the permit fee is: ❑ Partnership ❑ p. Sled Dog Race Classic ❑ $0 - $19,999; or if you are a New Applicant .............................. $20.00 ❑ Association ❑ q. Snow Machine Classic ❑ $20,000 - $99,999.....---............................................................ $50.00 $100.00 ❑ r. Deep Freeze Classic ❑ $100,000 or more ....—.......................................................... 7. LOCAL OFFICERS (must be current bona fide members in good standing) NAME TITLE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER/DATE OF BIRTH DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER L..G-o,c1 QUC6A;1_-L Piece 5' - q8 - OL Z y Z R� - `fist U61 EP,Ie k'(y 1Ak U, P 1g-3- 6-7754 — �,2 Jey"e Ross 10y - 2940b6 18.3- 04-0826 (Rev. 8/96) (1 PERSON IN CHARGE OF GAMES. This must be a bona fide and active member of the qualified organization, or an employee of the municipality. This person is responsible for maintaining the records and preparing all the required reports. An alternate member must be designated as the responsible person during the absence of the primary member in charge. If more than one alternate is to be designated, attach a separate sheet and provide the information required on this page for each. 11 any primary or alternate member in charge changes during the calendar year, you are required to notify the Department of the new person(s). Submit a copy of the board resolution appointing the primary and alternate members and giving authority to the primary and alternate members in charge to sign the application on behalf of the organization. The primary and alternate members in charge must have been an active member of the permlttee, on the boars of directors of the permittee, or an employee of the permittee for at least six months before the date of the permit application. A. PRIMARY B. ALTERNATE Name Daytime Telephone No. Name Daytime Telephone No. P ' C' -2C-3- `._ S- Lv , - SiRNiG,J Fn Z` Mailing Address Social Security No. Mailing Address Social Security No. C 5 E ' /V SS- - S2 - 896E S SAS S&/A) % A62- City, State, Zip Code Title City, State, Zip Code Title %I c 1171r, j 7q7L11E 9. DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS. Before a permit can be granted, the organization must plan to use the net proceeds from gaming activities for the awarding of prizes, and for political, educational, civic, public, charitable, patriotic or religious uses IN ALASKA. (See Department of Revenue Statutes and Regulations for specific rules on how proceeds can and cannot be spent.) In the space below, tell how your organization plans to use the net proceeds from the gaming activities (scholarships, medical assistance, food baskets for needy, firefighting equipment). Be specific. 10. LOCATION OF ACTIVITIES.Specify where the games will be conducted, including the drawing of raffle tickets. If this location changes, you must notify both the Department of Revenue and the local government within 10 days. List name of premises, street address, City and Zip Code for Each Gaming Activity (Attach additional pages as needed) Type of Game Contact Person Daytime Telephone 1. Ti } fV .0 - 2. 3. 4. 5. 11. OPERATOR (if any). If an operator is employed to conduct the gaming activities, the contract must be approved by the Department before activities commence. You may contract with only one operator at a time for each type of gaming activity. Name of Licensed Operator Lic. No. Copy of Contract with Operator: O is attached. O Is being sent by certified mail. 12. THESE QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED. YES NO O W A. Has any person listed in 8 or 10 above ever been convicted of or on parole for a felony in arty state, territory, or forelgn country? O 91� B. Has any person listed in 8 or 10 above ever been convicted of a crime involving theft or dishonesty, or has ever been convicted of a violation in any state of a municipal, state or federal gambling law? O C. Will any person listed in 8 or 10 above receive compensation of any kind from the receipts of the gaming activities? If yes, explain. 13. SIGNATURE. This application must be signed by the primary person in charge of games listed in 8A above. CAUTION: A photocopied signature will not be accepted. Make sure that the original signed application is filed with the Department of Revenue. I declare, under penaltyof unsworn falsification, that I have examined this application, including any anachment, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it istrue and complete. I understand that any a statement made on this application or any attachments is punishable by law. - Signature Printed Name Date X t� ° v 14. PROOF OF FILING. You must submit two copies of this application to the dry or borough where the proposed gaming activities will occur. Proof of filing must accompany this application. To speed processing, please have the appropriate local government official acknowledge receipt of this application by signature below. Signature of Location Govemment Official lfle/city Date Printed Name of Person Who Signed a phoneNumber (2) 04-0826 ( Rev. 9/96) BOARD RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE PRIMARY AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS IN CHARGE OF GAMING Permit Number _966 7 1 _ RESOLUTION # Pursuant to the requirements of AS 05.15.112 regarding the appointment and duties of the Primary Member in Charge of Gaming, The Board of Directors of ock "Oti or 71fL-- An)662L5 _ at a meeting held at )<E4,q-j , Alaska on ©e r. z i 996 19 �_, proposed the following resolution: ' BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the,�!{V&--H of A46Y er- ^?tC f�yGE�s that'�TL�,e,y sib was appointed as the Primary Member in Charge of Gaming. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the that L r *e s7-- / -r"�O was appointed as the Alternate Member in Charge of Gaming. Passed C)C l , 7 192,6 President: ture Vice President: 2gnature Secretary: .ev>A..� J, &� C�� Sgnature � Treasurer: nature Primary:lT Mailing Address_ City, Zip:E.UAj A� Day Phone: Soc. Sec. #: Alternate: 772 Mailing Address: City, Zip: Ak' 9T/I Day Phone: Soc. Sec. #:z Title: (YJE �'-Te72 Title: 04-0826a (Rev. 9/96) Alaska Department of Revenue Charitable Gaming Division P.O. Box 110440, Juneau, AK99811-0440 FILING INSTRUCTIONS Use this form 04-0826 to apply for a permit to conduct bingo, raffles and lotteries, pull tabs, dog mushers' contests, fish derbies, contests of skill, and the classics: rain, ice, salmon, king salmon, canned salmon, mercury, goose, sled dog race, snow machine, and deep freeze. 1. You will need the completed application plus three copies. Contact the Department of Revenue at the address listed above loran additional application, or photocopy the application as needed. a Mail the original application to the Alaska Department of Revenue. Photocopies will not be accepted. b. Keep a photocopy foryour records. c. Submit two additional copies to the office of the city or borough where the gaming activities are to be conducted. Acceptable forms of proof of filing include, but are not limitedto: 1) A written nonobjection from the local governing body. 2) A letterfrom the local governing body stating that two copies of the application have been received/ submitted. 3) A copy of the application, or the original, showing the local government's date stamp. (The date stamp must in some way identify the local government) (IMPORTANT: To speed processing of the permit, obtain your local government's response to this application before filing itwith the Department of Revenue. See section 14 of the application. ) 2. Enclose the permit fee with the original application filed with the Department of Revenue. This fee is not refundable. Upon approval of the application by the Department, a permit will be issued for that calendar year. Activities maybe conducted only after a permit has been issued and posted on the premises. The activity or activities authorized underthe permit may be conducted during the entire calendaryear unless your prize award limitations have been met or your permit is suspended or revoked by the Department. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Only municipalities and qualified organizations as defined in AS 05.15.210(29) are eligible for a permit. To qualify, an organization must meet ail of the following requirements: 1. It must be a bona fide civic or service organization or a bona fide religious, charitable, fraternal, labor, political, oreducationai organization, police orfire departmentand company, dog mushers' association, outboard motor association, or fishing derby, or nonprofit trade association in Alaska The organization may be a firm, corporation, company, association, or partnership. 2. Theorganization mustoperate withoutprofitto its members. This means that no private shareholder or individual may benefit from any part of the net earnings of the organization except as provided by law. (A certificate or letter of tax exemption issued by the Internal Revenue Service is evidence that the organization operates without prof itto its members.) 3. The organization must have been in existence continuously fora period of three years immediately before applying for a permit. This duration requirement must be met by the local organization. The number of years of existence of an affiliated or associated organization cannot be counted for this purpose. 4. The organization must have at least 25 Alaska members. DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS Net proceeds from gaming activities must be dedicated within one yearto the awarding of prizes, and to political, educational, civic, public, charitable, patriotic or religious uses in Alaska (AS 05.15.150). Charitable projects which an organization may sponsor include education grants, training assistance or job counseling, food baskets, medical or health care assistance, charitable functions and dinners for the commu- nity, etc. Authorized uses include promoting the welfare and well-being of the membership of the organization within its own community. This means thata member may receive assistance in the form of various charitable donationswhich have been approved by the organization's board of directors. The qualifications to receive the charitable donations must include a requirement that all members of the organization within the community may quality and receive assistance. Authorized uses do not include organizational parties, dinners, benefits, picnics, or social functions limited to members and their families. Dedicated net proceeds given to another qualified organization may not be used to pay any person for services rendered in connection with the activities from which the funds were derived. Permittees may not erect, buy or lease buildings or land for their organization with the net proceeds unless these buildings are: (1) used exclusively for education, civic, public, or religious purposes (such as hospitals, churches, schools, govern- ment buildings, or community centers); or (2) turned overto an appropriate nonprofit organization which qualifies as atax-exempt organization underthe Internal Revenue Code, Section 501(C)(3), or to a local, state or federal government. The direct or indirect payment of any portion of the net proceeds of a bingo or pull -tab game to a lobbyist registered under AS 24.45 is prohibited. Detailed records of all disbursements must be kept for later audit review. These must be kept with the other accounting records for a period of three years. EXPENSES Only bona fide, reasonably necessary expenses may be incurred orpaiu in connection with the operation of permitted activity. This includes the cost of goods, wares, merchandise, and personal services required to operate the activity. Personal services include those performed by an employee of the permittee, or by a licensed operator hired by the permittee. Compensation to the operator may not be related to the receipts from the activity (AS 05.15.160). This means that the operator may not be paid based on a percentage. For specific information about authorized expenses that may be deducted, see the instructions to Form 04-0833c Annual Financial Statement, Schedule C - Game -Related Expenses, ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND ADDITIONALFEE A statement accounting for all money generated from authorized games of chance and contests of skill for the year must be filed by March 15 following the end of the calendaryear. If the gross receipts from the gaming activities were $20,000 or more, an additional fee of one percent of the net proceeds must be paid at the time of filing the annual financial statement (AS 05.15.020(b) and AS 05.15.080(b)). PENALTIES (AS05.15.200) A person who knowingly violates, or aids or solicits a person to violate the laws governing games of chance and contests of skill, is guilty of a violation for the first offense. If convicted, that person may be fined up to $300. For the second and each subsequent offense, the person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor. If convicted, that person may be fined up to $1,000, or sentenced to up to 90 days in jail, or both. A person who, with the intent to mislead a public servant in the perfor- mance of the public servant's duty, submits a false statement in an application for a permit, is guilty of unsworn falsification, a class A misdemeanor. If convicted, that person may be fined up to $5,000, or sentenced to up to a year in jail, or both. (3) 04-0826 (Rev.9/95) COUNCIL ITEMS RECEIVED 017 2 8 19% Mr. & Mrs. Steven M. Perrizo Box 887 Kenai. Alaska 99611 OCTOBER 28. 1996 The Honorable Mayor John Williams & Kenai City Council Members 210 Fidalgo Street Kenai. Alaska 99611 Dear Mayor Williams & Council Members, This letter is to serve as a letter of support for the City of Kenai to pursue the Kenai River Restoration & Recreation Enhancement Project - South Side of River Mouth. We are private property owners on the south side of the river, in the city limits, and we would be favorably impacted by this project. My family has occupied this land for the last three generations. It was always considered such a unique piece of beachfront land in that there was ZERO erosion. This was due to the wild rye/wild oats that grew in abundance and created the dunes that buffeted the land from the sea. It has always been that way. That is until the hordes of people. recreational vehicles, etc., invaded the south side of the river to dip net for fish! The hundreds and hundreds (thousands) of people that use the mouth of the Kenai River to dip net for their salmon have no idea what they are doing to the precious beaches and surrounding areas. Their only mission is to get to the mouth of the river. Their tires spinning out of control on the soft sand, literally pulverizing the beaches, totally change the natural slope of the beach. When the next high tide comes in, the sand has been altered from its natural state, and is like granulated sugar, and the tide can literally "float" the sand to make the beach flat. As the tides increase with each lunar cycle, the tides come in farther than the last time because the slope of the beach has changed. The result is EROSION. In the last five years we have witnessed 100-150 year old trees become the victim of erosion on this property. Trees my brothers, sisters, and I played on as children are gone! Providing the access to the mouth of the Kenai River on the south side and providing parking and restroom facilities would accomplish so many beneficial things to this area: 1. Establish a parking/camping area for the general public. 2. Grant access for public who do not have 4 wheel drive vehicles. 3. Establish an area for restroom facilities. Currently there are none, which creates unsanitan! and undesirable conditions while hundreds of people use the dunes for that purpose. 4. Allow for SAFE, DEPENDABLE, and 24 hr. per day access, if needed, for timely response of emergency vehicles. Currently, access to the mouth of the river is dependent on the stage of the tide. Trespass of private property is how access is gained now if the tide is high. This trespass is resulting in the dangerous and costly erosion of private property. 5. Provide safe and easy access for city vehicles to retrieve trash receptacles. Currently there are two 55 gallon drums left perched on the beach at the mouth. These receptacles are not checked on a scheduled basis due to tide and beach conditions, and availability of 4 wheel drive city vehicles during working hours, and unsightly, unsanitary, filthy conditions exist. 6. Provide clear jurisdiction for police and emergency vehicles. Currently the only dedicated public access is located outside the city limits for a fishery that is taking place entirely in the city limits. The other "access" is a government section line, which is also the dividing line between the city and borough. Jurisdiction has always been a problem on this easement, simply because it is half borough, half city. 7. Provide clear jurisdiction and responsibility for maintenance. There is literally no maintenance on the section line easement, i.e., no grading in summer, or plowing of snow in winter. This access would be entirely within the city limits. 8. By confining the vehicular traffic on the beach to this one specific area, it would almost single-handedly guarantee the preservation and hopefully the restoration of the beautiful dunes on the south side of the river. Any erosion would then become the work of Mother Nature not the hundreds of vehicles chewing up the beach. The beaches in the Lower 48 are considered "National Treasures" and treated with respect and reverence. Maybe we can begin to show some respect to our beautiful beaches too. 9. Create recreation area for public. 10. This access would benefit Alaskans! Most improvements to our state and our communities are done with the visitor in mind. This grant would provide Alaskans a safer, easier route to reach the mouth of the river to participate in the dip net fishery that was created for all residents, without any participation or responsibility of the State. It just suddenly became the problem of the communitv and the residents of the Kenai River! 11. This project would lessen the human impact on the upper river. Most participants in the recreation activities involving the Kenai River, have one common goal in mind .... to take home fish. This grant would enable more participants in the dip net fishery, lessening the pressure for traveling upstream to get their fish. 12. Last, but certainly not least, this project is as vitally important and urgent for all the environmental and ecological reasons the North side of the mouth of the river was protected and the restoration and recreation enhancement programs were implemented. Again, we would express our support of the Mayor and the City Council to pursue this project! Very truly yours, ,, ✓�'� Steven kMUPeto Perrizo FREDERICK C. DUTHWEILER, P. E. 37675 Cannery Road Kenai, Alaska 99611 October 23, 1996 Mr. John Williams, "Mayor and City Council Members City of Kenai 210 Fidalgu Kenai, Alaska 99611 Re: Kenai River Restoratiurr arid Recreation Project, South Side of the Kenai River mouth Dear :Mayor Williams arid Kenai City Council: 1 am writing to support the City of Kenai proposal to build a neti access route fruni the end of Buwpicker Lane in a northwest direction to provide public access to the south side of the mouth of the Kenai River. This popular spot continues to attract inure people each :ear' causing area property owners more arid mort: problems. I hope the end resuli of this project will be to pru. ide parking close enough to the iienai River mouth to encourage the public to keep all . ehicles off of the beach. F. C. Dutlrweiler, P. E. Property Owner Directl;- Affected By This City of Kenai Action RECEIVED OCT 2 8 1996 KENAI CITY CLERK OCTOBER 29, 1996 MAYOR WILLIAMS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS RECEIVED OCf 3 0 � KENAI CITY CLERK RE: KENAI RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT/SOUTH SIDE. MAYOR WILLIAMS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE HAVE REVIEWED THE PROPOSALS FOR THE KENAI RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIVER, AND AGREE THAT THE EXISTING SITUATION IS NOT GOOD. IN REGARDS TO THE TWO PROPOSED ACCESS ROUTES, WE ARE DEFINITELY NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL FOR ROUTE #1, AS IT WOULD TOTALY DESTROY THE EXISTING 20 YEAR OLD AIRSTRIP THAT IS LOCATED THERE. WE ARE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL FOR ROUTE #2, BUT WOULD SUGGEST THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER IF IT ENDED A LITTLE FURTHER NORTH ON THE BEACH, AND WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE PARKING LOT DEFINITELY BE NORTH OF THE ACCESS ROAD. WE BELIEVE THAT IT COULD BE QUITE DANGEROUS TO HAVE PUBLIC PARKING ON AN AIRSTRIP. INTRESTED BUT CONCERNED PROPERTY OWNERS: • i • & "'�, L�- 0 - I x )aA7 sE a. wesr CITY OF KENAI ►► Od ear" 4 4ZajJ= ►► 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 Ityltril MEMORANDUM 1I I I I! 1992 TO: ALL CONCERNED FROM: Carol L. Freas, Fk City of Kenai DATE: October 23, 1996 RE: COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE CHANGE November Council Meetings: Because a majority of members of the Kenai City Council will be attending the AML Conference in Anchorage November 20-23, 1996, the regularly scheduled November 20 council meeting has been changed to November 13, 1996. The packet day for the November 13 meeting will be November 8 -- same deadline, etc. as any normal council meeting packet day. Remember, Student Government Day has also be set for November 13. I will forward more information about the students, etc. when I receive it. January Council Meetings: Because January 1 falls on the first Wednesday of the month, which would be the regularly scheduled council meeting date, the first council meeting of January has been changed to January 8, 1997. Packet day for the January 8 meeting will be January 3, 1997. If you have any questions, please contact me. clf Sara Pearson 229 Nest Corral Ave Soldotna, AK 99669 262-5888 wk. 262-9640 hm. To: Nlavor John Williams Acting Kenai Cite Tanager, Rick Ross & Kenai Cite Council 'Members Oct. 28th, 1996 As I was boarding the plane this past week on my way out of town, I g n "Kenai Police Officer w rabbed a copy of the Clarioto read the headline article on't be Charged" - referring to the woman who wrongfully accused Officer Langseth of raping her while he was on duty. The whole time during this eternal investigation by the AK State Troopers, the lady's name was never mentioned and she was protected from the public, while Mitch Langseth's name was dragged thru the mud. I've heard mane people speculate and offer opinion on what they thought really happened, and many bad rumors were started and spread about Officer Langseth. \oar this investigation is over and the troopers found her allegations to be false. What really burns me is that this lade who wrongfully accused an upstanding; police officer, one without blemish for the entire time on the police force, LIED and ruined Mitch's name and was protected from the public ever knowing who she was. She was not a minor, she was an adult, 24 vears old, who sought to ruin Mitch I.angseth's career and just about did it. Whv does the press not print her name so we can kiiow who it is who tries to destrov people's credibility? Who is this woman v�Aho gets awav with lving? The C ity of Kenai should sue her for the cost of this investigation and the $22,000 the cite PUt uut to pay Mitch While on administrative leave. end, Mitch should sue her for personal defamation" This woman should not be protected! �Ve should not allow people to get away with wrongful accusations of this magnitude. It is a scary thing to think that anvone could destrov another's career by telling a lie and getting awav with it. Now that the investigation is over and ditch Langseth's name is cleared, I believe this Nvoman should be held accountable for her actions. She has caused much strain on the City of Kenai, the Kenai Police Department, Mitch's family and friends. There is something to be said for protecting the victim during the investigation and if the accusation is found to be true, but when someone makes a false accusation to destrov someone elses career they need to be identified and prosecuted! Sincerely, Sara Pearson Cite Council Member, Soldotna 1791- M CITY OF KENAI . . "Oil Capdal o� 4lvAd . 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200 Kenai,Alaska 9%11-7794 Phone 907-283-7535 Fax 907-20-3014 Date // J / / 974 Number of Page: 0 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 61 1996 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://vww.Kenai.not/city BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING - Appeal of Delmar sanders B. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) 1. Ginger Steffy/Kathy Scott - Trip Report/1996 ASTC Conference, "Touching Minds and Changing Futures" 1. Ordinance No. 1723-96 Revised Comprehensive Recommending Adoption 2. Ordinance No. 1724-96 and Appropriations by Lobbyist Services. 3. Resolution No. 96-84 Kenai ARFF Capital Pr 4. •1996-97 Liquor Licen Restaurant. - Approving and Adopting the Plan for the City of Kenai and by the Kenai Peninsula Borough. - Increasing Estimated Revenues $24,000 in the General Fund for - Transferring $10,000 in the 3ject Fund for Travel. ae Application - Old Town Village Additional information can be found at http://www.Kenai.net/city. The public is invited to attend and participate. Carol L. Freas City Clerk MAYOR'S REPORT OCTOBER 16, 1996 COUNCIL MEETING CHANGES TO THE AGENDA TO CLARIFY: B-1, Persons Scheduled to be Heard - Kathy Scott/ Presentation of Public Health Nurse Study. B-2, Persons Scheduled to be Heard - Kathy Scott/ Ginger Steffy - Trip Report. ADD TO: H-2, Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 - Alaska Pump & Supply, Inc./$2,697.03 ADD TO: I4, Application of Tom Ackerly/Personnel Arbitration Board CONSENT AGENDA MAYOR'S REPORT BY: CLERK PUBLIC WORKS CLERK