Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-18 Council PacketKenai City Council Meeting Packet November 18, 1998 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING November 18, 1998 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http: //www.ci.kenai.ak.us STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY` AGENDA ITEM A: o 2. 3. 4. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Agenda Approval Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motiOn. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) ITEM C: , . , . PUBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance No. 1803-98- Amending the Zoning Code at KMC 12.25.030 to More Clearly Define "Junk Vehicle." Resolution No. 98-80 - Transferring $58,216 in the Kenai ARFF Capital Project Fund. Resolution No. 98-81 -Accepting ADEC Grant No. 47547 from the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation in the Amount of $450,000 for Well House No. 4 and Water Mains. Resolution No. 98-82- Accepting ADEC Grant No. 47548 from the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation in the Amount of $326,243 to Upgrade Well Houses No. 1 and 2 and Construct a New Pump House. -1- ITEM D: . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. ITEM E: o ITEM F: STUDENT COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION R~PORTS Mayor Council Members City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Finance Department Representative Public Works Director Airport Manager Fire Chief Animal Control Officer Water/Sewer Foreman Librarian Parks & Recreation Director Police Chief MINUTES *Regular Meeting of November 4, 1998. STUDENT MEETING ADJOURNMENT -2- MAYOR'S REPORT NOVEMBER 18 ~ 199 8 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CHANGF~ TO THE AGENDA REOUESTED BY: SUBSTITUTE: C-l, Ordinance No. 1803-98 -- Substitute ordinance to replace Ordinance No. 1803 included in the packet. CITY ATTORNEY CONSENT AGENDA No changes. MAYOR'S REPORT , "Mayor's Breakfast" BY: .KCHS; 11-13-98 12'47; 9072833230 => 907 283 3014; #1/1 ' ?,::~unc:il Members '"/tv Manager 1.1)' '"'ity A'u.orney (11' City Clerk (1)' i~ul')lic Works Managers {2)' :~rport Mm~agcr { l)' ~,'inartc. c. Department {.1) Fire C:hief (1 }' Animal Control Officer(l)' 'Water / ,'3ewer Foreman ( 1 )' Librm'i,.~.n il )' Parks/Rccrcation Dir.e.c. tor' (l) Police Chiel" (1 }' Please complete and return to. Carol (fax 283-3014i. AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING November 18, 1998 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http: / / www.ci.kenai.ak.us / STUDENT Cd)VERNMENT DAY ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER o 2. 3. 4. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Agenda Approval Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) ITEM C: o . . . ITEM D: o 2. 3. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance No. 1803-98- Amending the Zoning Code at KMC 12.25.030 to More Clearly De£me "Junk Vehicle." Resolution No. 98-80- Transferring $58,216 in the Kenai ARFF Capital Project Fund. Resolution No. 98-81 -Accepting ADEC Grant No. 47547 from the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation in the Amount of $450,000 for Well House No. 4 and Water Mains. Resolution No. 98-82- Accepting ADEC Grant No. 47548 from the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation in the Amount of $326,243 to Upgrade Well Houses No. 1 and 2 and Construct a New Pump House. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission Page 1 of 3 . Parks & Recreation Commission Planning as Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board c. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board d. Alaska Municipal League Report ITEM E: . MINUTES *Regular Meeting of November 4, 1998. ITEM F: CORRF~PONDENCE ITEM G: . . OLD BUSINESS Discussion - Jim Carter's withdrawal of proposed "Professional Services Contract" to perform a user-interest survey regarding expansion of the Kenai Airport. Discussion - Public Opinion Survey- Final Draft. ITEM H' o . . . , . o NEW BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1804-98 - Appropriating $17,056 in the General Fund for Legislative Department Salaries. *Ordinance No. 1805-98 - Appropriating $145,650 in the '98 Water System Improvements Capital Project Fund. *Ordinance No. 1806-98~Appropriating $900,000 in the Well House No. 4 Capital Project Fund. Approval- Proposed Settlement of MarkAir Express Bankruptcy Claim. Approval- Proposed Settlement of Claim Against George Bradford. ITEM I: o ADMINISTRATION REPORTS Mayor City Manager Page 2 of 3 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works 7. Airport Manager ITEM J' DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council EXECUTIVE SESSION- Possible executive session to discuss proposed settlements in Bradford and MarkAir {Items H-6 and H-7 above). ITEM K: ADJOURNMENT Page 3 of 3 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 r 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1803-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE ZONING CODE AT KMC 12.25.030 TO MORE CLEARLY DEFINE "JUNK VEHICLE." WHEREAS, KMC 12.25.030 currently does not set clear standards as to what constitutes a junk vehicle; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Kenai to design clear standards so enforcement will be easier and more efficient; and WHEREAS, a better definition of a junk vehicle will provide the public with clearer notice of what is not allowable; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that KMC 12.25.030 be changed to read as follows: 12.25.030 Leaving of [WRECKED, DISCARDED, NON-OPERATING] Junked or Illegally Parked Vehicles: (a) No person shall leave any [PARTIALLY DISMANTLED, NON- OPERATING, WRECKED, OR] junked vehicle on any street, highway, or public property within the City. (b) No person shall leave any vehicle remaining on public property designated for parking in violation of regulations, ordinances, and/or posted times, periods, or conditions. Any such vehicle shall be subject to emergency impounding procedures pursuant to KMC 12.25.040(c). (c) No person in charge or control of any property within the City, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allow any [PARTIALLY DISMANTLED, NON-OPERATING, WRECKED,] junked [, OR DISCARDED] vehicle to remain on such property longer than 72 hours; and no person shall leave any such vehicle on any property within the City for a longer time than [48] 72 hours; except that this ordinance shall not apply with regard to a vehicle in an enclosed building; a vehicle on the premises of a business enterprise operated in a lawful place and manner, when necessary to the operation of such business enterprise; or a vehicle in an appropriate storage place or depository maintained in a lawful place and manner by the City. (d) Notwithstanding KMC 12.25.030(c), no vehicle may be removed from private property without the consent of the property owner or occupant. (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c), ff the City Manager has reasonable grounds to believe that repairs can be made to render a iunk vehicle operable, that the registered owner or other person entitled to possession of the vehicle is willing to undertake or have Ordinance No. 1803- 98 Page 2 of 2 performed such repairs, that the vehicle does not pose any health or safety hazard, and that there is no reasonable means for removing the vehicle from public view while repairs are being performed, the City Manager may authorize a period of no more than thirty (30) days for the performance of such repairs. In no case, however, may this section be construed as authorizing the operation of a ~unkyard or other salvage or repair business where other requirements of the law have not been met. (f) "Junk vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is: (1.) Not currently registered for operation upon the public roads of the Ci .ty; (2) In a condition which exhibits two of the followin~ elements: i. A substantial amount of broken or missing glass; ii. Missing two or more wheels or tires; iii. Missing a body panel or bOdy part, such as quarter panels, bumper, trunk lid or hood; iv. Missing an essential component such as the engine, transmission, carburetor, distributor, brake or wheel cylinder, brake shoe, generator, or alternator, starter, front passenger seat, or drive shaft. v. Stripped, wrecked or otherwise inoperable due to mechanical failure; or vi. Has not been repaired because of mechanical difficulties or because the cost of repairs required to make it operable exceeds the fair market value of the vehicle. PASSED BY THE November, 1998. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this day of ATTEST: John J. Williams, Mayor Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduced: Adopted: Effective: November 4, 1998 November 18, 1998 December 18, 1998 (10/29/98 sp) CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ 98-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, RECOMMENDING THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE AT 12.25.030 BE AMENDED TO SET CLEAR STANDARDS FOR WHAT CONSTITUTES A JUNK VEHICLE. WHEREAS, KMC 12.25.030 currently does not set clear standards as to what constitutes a junk vehicle; WHEREAS, the Commission believes it is in the best interest of the City of Kenai to design clear standards so that enforcement could be easier and more efficient; WHEREAS, the Commission believes that clearer standards would provide the public with clearer notice as to what is not allowable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO THE KENAI CITY COUNCIL KMC 12.25.030 BE )dVIENDED AS FOLLOWS: 12.25.030 Leaving of [WRECKED, DISCARDED, NON-OPERATING] Junked or Illegally Parked Vehicles: (a) No person shall leaVe any [P~T~LY DISMANTLED, NON- OPERATING, WRECKED, OR] junked vehicle on any street, highway, or public property within the City. (b) No person shall leave any vehicle remaining on public property designated for parking in violation of regulations, ordinances, and/or posted times, periods, or conditions. Any such vehicle shall be subject to emergency impounding procedures pursuant to KMC 12.25.040(c). (c) No person in charge or control of any property within the City, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allow any [PARTIALLY DISMANTLED, NON-OPERATING, WRECKED,] junked [, OR DISCARDED] vehicle to remain on such property longer than 72 hours; and no person shall leave any such vehicle on any property within the City for a longer time than [48] 72 hours; except that this ordinance shall not apply with regard to a vehicle in an enclosed building; a vehicle on the premises of a business enterprise operated in a lawful place and manner, when necessary to the operation of such business enterprise; or a vehicle in an appropriate storage place or depository maintained in a lawful place and manner by the City. (d) Notwithstanding KMC 12.25.030(c), no vehicle may be removed from private property without the consent of the property owner or occupant. (Ord. 874) (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c), if the Ci_ty Manager has reasonable grounds to believe that repairs can be made to render a junk vehicle operable, that the registered owner or other person entitled to possession of the vehicle is willing to undertake or have performed such repairs, that the vehicle does not pose any health or safe _ty hazard, and that RESOLUTION NO. PZ 98-54 Page 2 there is no reasonable means for removing the vehicle from public view while repairs are being performed, the City Manger may authorize a period of no more than thirty (30) days for the performance of such repairs. In no case, however, may this section be construed as authorizing the operation of a junlcyard or other salvage or repair business where other requirements of the law have not been met. (f) "Junk vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is: (!) Not currently registered for operation upon the public roads of the City; (2) In a condition which exhibits two of the following elements' i. A substantial amount of broken or missing glass; ii. Missing two or more wheels or tires; iii..... Missing a body panel or body part, such as quarter panels, bumper, mink lid or hood; iv. Missing an essemial component such as the engine, transmission, carburetor, distributor, brake or wheel cylinder, brake shoe, generator, or alternator, starter, front passenger seat, or drive shaft. (3) Stripped, wrecked or otherwise inoperable due to mechanical failure; or (4) Has not been repaired because of mechanical difficulties or because the cost of repairs required to make it operable exceeds the fair market value of the vehicle. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 28th day of October 1998. SUBSTITUTE Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI ORDINANCE NO. 1803~98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AMENDING THE ZONING CODE AT KMC 12.25.030 TO MORE CLEARLY DEFINE "JUNK VEHICLE." WHEREAS, KMC 12.25.030 currently does not set clear standards as to what constitutes a junk vehicle; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Kenai to design clear standards so enforcement will be easier and more efficient; and WHEREAS, a better defmition of a junk vehicle will provide the public with clearer notice of what is not allowable; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that KMC 12.25.030 be changed to read as follows: 12.25.030 Leavina of [WRECKED, DISCARDED, NON-OPERATING] Junked or Illegally Parked Vehicles: (a) No person shall leave any [PARTIALLY DISMANTLED, NON- OPERATING, WRECKED, OR] junked vehicle on any street, highway, or pubhc property within the City. (b) No person shall leave any vehicle remaining on pubhc property designated for parking in violation of regulations, ordinances, and/or posted times, periods, or conditions. Any Such vehicle shall be subject to emergency impounding procedures pursuant to KMC 12.25.040(c). (c) No person in charge or control of any property within the City, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or othemrise, shall allow any [PARTIALLY DISMANTLED, NON-OPERATING, WRECKED,] junked [, OR DISCARDED] vehicle to remain on such property longer than 72 hours; and no person shall leave any such vehicle on any property within the City for a longer time than [48] 72 hours; except that this ordinance shall not apply with regard to a vehicle in an enclosed building; a vehicle on the premises of a business enterprise operated in a lawful place and manner, when necessary to the operation of such business enterprise; or a vehicle in an appropriate storage place or depository maintained in a lawful place and manner by the City. (d) Notwithstanding KMC 12.25.030(c), no vehicle may be removed from private property without the consent of the property owner or occupant. (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c), if the City Manager has reasonable grounds to believe that repairs can be made to render a iunk vehicle operable, that the registered owner or other person Ordinance No. 1803- 98 Page 2 of 2 entitled to possession of the vehicle is willing to undertake or have performed such repairs, that the vehicle does not pose any health or safe .ty hazard, and that there is no reasonable means for removing the vehicle from public view while repairs are being performed, the City Manager may authorize a period of no more than thirty (30) days for the performance of such repairs. In no case, however, mai this section be construed as authorizing the operation of a iunlw, ard or other salvage or repair business where other requirements of the law have not been met. (f) "Junk vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is: (1) Not currently registered for operation upon the public roads of the City; (2) In a condition which exhibits two of the following elements: A substantial amount of broken or missing glass; ii. Missing two or more wheels or tires; iii. Missing a body panel or body part, such as quarter Panels, bumper, trunk lid or hood; iv. Missing an essential component such as the engine, transmission, carburetor, distributor, brake or wheel cylinder, brake shoe, generator, or alternator, starter, front passenger seat, or drive shaft. [3] Stripped, wrecked or otherwise inoperable due to mechanical failure; or [4] Has not been repaired because of mechanical difficulties or because the cost of repairs required to make it operable exceeds the fair market value of the vehicle. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this November, 1998. day of ATTEST: John J. Williams, Mayor Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Introduced: Adopted: Effective: November 4, 1998 November 18, 1998 December 18, 1998 (10/29/98 sp) Suggested by: Administration City of Kenai RESOLUTION NO. 98-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA TRANSFER~NG $58,216 IN THE KENAI ARFF CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Change Order No. 7 to the Alcan General Contract on October 14, 1998 for $58,216; and WHEREAS, funds are available in the contingency account. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the following transfers be made: Kenai ARFF Capital Proiect Fund From: Contingency $58,216 To: Construction $58,216 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of November, 1998. ATTEST: JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance: . .,~~. (11/12/98) ld Suggested' by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RE~OLUTION NO. 98-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA FORMALLY ACCEPTING ADEC GRANT NO. 47547 FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $450,000 FOR WELL HOUSE NO. 4 AND WATER MAINS. WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has offered the City of Kenai a grant in the amount of $450,000 to finance the design, inspection, and construction of an exploratory and production well, a new well house with all related appurtenances, and additional water mains; and WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council formally accepts this ADEC Grant and agrees that the City will accept the responsibility to operate and maintain the proposed improvement and agrees to the terms and conditions of the grant offer; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to contribute $450,000 as its share of this project; this share will be in the form of State Direct Legislative Grant No. 4/96-003 that the City has already received plus City of Kenai water and sewer funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City formally accepts ADEC Grant No. 47547 from the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation in the amount of $450,000 for Well House No. 4 and water mains and accepts the conditions of the grant offer. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of November, 1998. JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Attest: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance' ~ t'~'' Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RF.~OLUTION NO. 98-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA FORMALLY ACCEPTING ADEC GRANT NO. 47548 FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $326,243 TO UPGRADE WELL HOUSES NO. 1 & 2 AND CONSTRUCT A NEW PUMP HOUSE. WHEREAS, the State of Alaska has offered the City of Kenai a grant in the amount of $326,243 to finance the design, inspection, and construction to upgrade Well Houses No. 1 & 2, construct a new pump house, and complete any other related modifications; and WHEREAS, the Kenai City Council formally accepts this ADEC Grant and agrees that the City will accept the responsibility to operate and maintain the proposed improvement and agrees to the terms and conditions of the grant offer; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to contribute $419,407 as its share of this project; this share will be in the form of a Municipal Matching Grant and ADWF Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City formally accepts ADEC Grant No. 47548 from the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation in the amount of $326,243 to upgrade Well Houses No. 1 & 2 and construct a new pump house and accepts the conditions of the grant offer. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of November 1998. JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Attest: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance' ~~~/ CITY OF KENAI DATE: "Viligge ,dth a past - Ci~ ,dth a £uture. " NAME: WILLIAM LEO CLAY Resident of the City of Kenai? YES Residence Address 51 4 OVERLAND AVENUE CANDIDATES FOR BACKGROUND AND PERSONAL DATA - AND 05 NOVEMBER, 1998 How long? 9 MONTHS APT #30 KENAI, AK 99611 Marline Address SAME Home Fax No. Business Fax No. 2 8 3 - 7 7 6 5 Home Telephone No. 2 8 3- 6 2 5 8 Business Telephone No 2 8 3- 8 0 0 9 Email Address' flyfsr@cnkcs, com EMPLOYER: ALASKA MARITIME AGENCY Job Title VESSEL MANAGER OPERATIONS NAME OF SPOUSE: NEVER BEEN MARRIED Current membership in organizations: MOOSE LODGE I 9 4 2, Past orEanizational memberships: VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER COMMITTEF~ OR COMMISSIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE INTERESTED: HARBOR COMMISSION WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE INVOLVED WITH THIS COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE? I HAVE A LONG STANDING INTEREST TN THE MA~I~TMW. C~M~UNT~¥ BOTH PROFESSIONALLY AND PERSONALLLY, WITH A COMMITMENT TO GIVE SOMETHING BACK TO MY COMMUNITY. WHAT BACKGROUND, EXPERIENCE, OR CREDENTIALS DO YOU POSSESS TO BRING TO THE BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP? I FEEL THAT MY 16 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN A LOGISTICS MARITIME PROFESSION WILL BE VALUABLE TO THE CITY OF KENAI AND THE SEAFARING MARINERS WHO DEPART FROM KENAI HARBOR. YOU WILL NOTE IN MY ATTACHED RE~UME THAT MY CAREER WITH THE U.S. NAVY WAS QUITE UNIQUE IN THAT I STARTED OUT AS AN ORDINARY STOREKEEPER SERVING ON A SUBMARINE TO A SUPPLY OFFICER OF AN OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VESSEL WITH A RANK OF LT. COMMANDER. SERVING AS A VESSEL SUPPLY OFFICER WAS A DEPARTMENT HEAD POSITION WITH TOT~L FISCA _I~PONSIBILTIES. Signature WILLIAM LEO CLAY 3342 W. 79 Avenue Anchorage, AK 99502 (907) 566-8445 PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIVE A challenging position with a progressive company which will utilize acquired skills, expertise and experience in purchasing, logistics, inventory control and budget management. Desire a position with growth and advancement potential. SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Offedng extensive background based on 15 years of expenence and training in diverse supply, logistics, purchasing, and warehouse management environments with demonstrated initiative, expertise, and success. · Over 12 years experience in managing commercial, naval, and government logistics operations. Expert knowledge of marine transportation, shipping, traffic management, cargo transfer, and computerized tracking systems. Experienced in inventory control, longshoreman operations, warehousing and distribution, total quality leadership and service, and administration of customer service and materials management department head. · Plan, organize, execute, and held responsible for multi-million dollar budgets. Maintain accountability of inventories and capital assets, track expenditures, and disburse semi-monthly payrolls for nearly 100 personnel. As a Department Head, supervised the order, receipt, issuance of shipboard equipment, spare parts, and provisions. · At ease in high stress and fast-paced environment requiring independent decisions, expertise in analysis and problem-solving, extensive contact with vendors and customers with meticulous attention to detail. Possess a natural flair for foreign languages with knowledge of Arabic, Spanish, and Italian. Experienced in international shipping and currency exchange. Supervised up to 25 foreign workers from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Philippines, and Italy. · Train, schedule, supervise and evaluate food service, sales, service, supply and disbursing personnel. Monitor workflow activities, track production schedules and work quality control, respond to questions and complaints, and resolve problems. · PC Computer Skills Include: MS-DOS/Windows 95, Corel Word Perfect, MS Office, Excel, Unix, E-mail, lntemet, Supply Management Module. · As Department Head, oversaw and prepare/submit records, reports, studies, purchase documents, contracts, and financiais. Negotiate contracts with merchandise vendors and suppliers to achieve most favorable pricing. EDUCATION AND TRAINING UNITED STATES NAVAL TRAINING -Vadous Locations Military Sealift Command Supply Officer School(First in Class), Supply Management School(First in Class), Hazardous Material Coordinator School(First in Class),Advanced Storekeeper "C" School(First in Class),Total Quality Leadership(First in Class), COSAL Use and Maintenance School(First in Class),Submarine Schools for Sonar Plot, Damage Control, Storekeeper, and Diver. CONTINUING EDUCATION-Various Locations University of Georgia(Beginning Sign Language) 1993, Community College of Santa Fe(Basic Computer) 1987, Rochester Fire Academy(Basic Firefighter, ladder company, victim extrication) 1980. WILLIAM L. CLAY Page 2 HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE US NAVY MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND-Camp Pedelton, Virginia USNS Waters (T-AGS 45), USNS Sirius (T-AFS 8), USNS Leroy Grumman (T-AC 195) Supply Officer-US Navy Military Sealift Command (1988-1998) Supervised and evaluated nine enlisted personnel, and manage a $1.25 Million budget, $8.1 Million inventory consisting of 300,000 line items, and all related task force expenditures. Interfaced with other supply activities, foreign contractors, shipyard management to expedite receipt and dispatching of high pdority cargo and issuance of requested consumables and repair parts. Responsible for maintenance of all records for the payment if subject contracts, currency conversion for contracts overseas jobs, and authorized of all purchases and budget expenditures. Served as officer in charge of fuel accountability dudng transfer of bulk petroleum products, and all supply functions. Fulfilled collateral duties as Quality Assurance Inspector and Hazardous Material Coordinator for all shipboard/shipyard for all discrepancies in material condition and transfer cycles. Inventory Control- Alaska West Supply Co. (3 Months in 1997) Was retained by above company in Dillingham to produce a reasonable inventory program for their lumber yard/building supply material business. Was terminated before any such practices were instituted. Buyer-Mills & Greer (6 Months in 1997) Responsible for placing orders through vendors for Sporting Goods store. Handled customer service problems in a retail environment. Conducted inventory of above mentioned sporting goods. Left due to company not being able to afford my salary. Relocated back to Alaska. Warehouse Supervisor- Maynards Electric (1987) Supervised all warehouse operations of an area wholesaler of electrical contracting equipment and supplies. Operated warehouse equipment and delivery truck. Managed 7 service personnel, and maintained records of all related shipping and receiving reports. Shipping Supervisor- Anixter/Rotelcom (1986-1987) Supervised 4 subordinate warehouseman in the day to day handling of all shipping requirements for a large sized electronic equipment and parts. Submarine Storekeeper- United States Navy (1982-1986) USS ANDREW JACKSON (SSBN-619), USS OMAHA (SSN-692) Handled shipboard supply department responsibilities. Received Naval Expeditionary Medal, Silver Dolphins(2 awards), and Deterrent Patrol pin (2 awards). Specific Achievements Include · Individually managed the reactivation of USNS Waters (Oceanographic Survey) from a material supply standpoint. In charge for ali matedal selection, ordering, receipt, and stowage. · Directed all cargo transfer operations for the USNS Leroy Grumman dudng Operation Desert Storm. Orchestrated sorting, barge loading, tracking, and preparation of messages. Managed all compressed bottled gas for a large fleet oiler. · Advised military leadership to supply the air field at Hurghada Egypt will all cargo handling equipment resulting in a dramatic increase of efficiency. · Prepared all messages for monthly reports for cargo operations, ship's budget, special high pdced repair parts tracking, monthly produce and subsistence requisitions, and open purchase materials not available through the standard supply system. · Coordinator of all hazardous material handling, transfer, offloading, packaging, and disposal. Prepare extensive and detailed documentation as well as associate messages in accordance with current government regulations. Supplemental Information · Available immediately, willing to travel/relocate. . References available upon request. KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 1998 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. CHAIRMAN WILL JAHRIG AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER/h ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES- October 12, 1998. ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5: REPORTS a. Director Dock Foreman ITEM OLD BUSINESS ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS ao Cunningham Park Upgrade -- City of Kenai/Kenai River Classic ITEM 8: COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS/OUESTIONS ITEM 9: INFORMATION a, Kenai City Council Action Agendas of October 7 and 21, 1998. ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 1998 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. CHAIRMAN WILL JAHRIG ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL Chairperson Jahrig called the meeting to order at approximately 7'05 p.m. Commissioners present: Commissioners absent' Spracher, Thompson, Jahrig and Eldridge McCune ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION: Commissioner Thompson MOVED for approval of the agenda as presented and Commissioner Spracher SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 12, 1998. MOTION: Commissioner Thompson MOVED for approval of the October 12, 1998 Harbor Commission meeting. Commissioner Eldridge SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 4: None. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5: REPORTS 5-a. Director Potters' Marsh -- Public Works Director Komelis reported he contacted Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Refuge Division who built and maintain the Potters Marsh boardwalk. The boardwalk is over ten years old. They are having frost-heave problems with the piling which is only around ten feet deep. 5-b. Dock Foreman -- Komelis reported Dock Foreman Freden attended the Harbor Convention in Dutch Harbor. He also reported that Foster Singleton, retired Harbormaster at Seward, passed away. ITEM 6: OLD BUSINESS Komelis reported a purchase order to Petratrovich, Nottingham & Drage for $5,000 was included in the council's packet for approval. The purchase order would cover the costs of the proposed study of the bluff erosion in Old Town as previously discussed by the Commission as well as the council. ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS Cunningham Park Upgrade -- City of Kenai/Kenai River Classic Komelis reported a purchase order in the amount of $12,000 to Wm. Nelson & Associates is on the council agenda for the engineering design of the Cunningham Park upgrade development. The upgrade will include work on bank stablization, boardwalk, pedestrian ramp, and boat ramp. No additional land will be purchased at this time. Enlargement of the parking area will not be a part of the upgrade project. MOTION: Commissioner Thompson MOVED to support the Cunningham Park upgrade project and Commissioner Eldridge SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 8: COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS/OUESTIONS Komelis was requested to placed funding for the boardwalk project on the next agenda and also asked him to check on how the boardwalk at Potters Marsh was funded. ITEM 9: ae INFORMATION Kenai City Council Action Agendas of October 7 and 21, 1998. HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 1998 PAGE 2 ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT It was noted the next Harbor Commission meeting was scheduled for December 7, 1998. The meeting adjourned at approximately 8'00 p.m. Minutes prepared by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 1998 PAGE 3 KENAI ADVISORY LIBRARY COMMISSION KENAI COMMUNITY LIBRARY ACTMTY ROOM NOVEMBER 3, 1998 ~ 7:30 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/k ROLL CALL ITEM.2' AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3' APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- October 6, 1998 ITEM 4' PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5: REPORTS Director Friends of the Library ITEM 6: OLD BUSINESS a. Joint Committee Patron Survey ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS ao December Open House Holt Revisited-- Back to the Drawingboard ITEM 8: COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS/OUESTIONS ITEM 9' INFORMATION Kenai City Council Action Agendas of October 7 and 21, 1998. ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT ® RF~ULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF KENAI ADVISORY LIBRARY COMMISSION NOVEMBER 3, 1998-- 7:30 P.M. KENAI LIBRARY BOB PETERS, CHAIR *** MINUTES *** CAlL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairman Peters called the meeting to order at 7'30 p.m. Members Present: Bob Peters, Vince O~Reilly, Janet Brown, Janice Rodes, Carol Brenckle, Kathy Heus. Lorrene Forbes ® ® ® ® .also Present: Director Emily DeForest, Councilman Joe Moore, Ethel Clausen, Contract Secretary Alison Rapp. APPROVAL OF AGENDA BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN. MOTION SECONDED BY HEUS. THE AGENDA WAS APPROVED AS WRITTEN. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ReEular Meeting of October 6, 1998 Brown requested a change to Item 5b, paragraph one. The change will read "Brown reported Friends of the Library are considering offering the trip..." BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OCTOBER 6, 1998 AS AMENDED. MOTION SECONDED BY RODES. MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None REPORTS a. Director Director DeForest reported a new employee, Carmen O'Neil, had been hired to replace a retiring employee, Dorothy Shaw. DeForest commented Ms. O'Neil has had two years training in the capacity as a temporary, part-time Library employee. DeForest noted the Library will be looking for a new temporary, part-time employee. Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 1 DeForest reported on the Director's Leadership Conference she attended in Girdwood the previous month. She noted discussion included a concern of public/school libraries diverting funds intended for public use to school use only. DeForest commented the Library closure has been advertised. Two-week books checked out after November 9, 1998, and one- week books checked out after November 16, 1998, will be due December 7, 1998. DeForest noted patrons were being asked to check out the maximum number of books. She further noted the book drop would be open and cleaned daily. DeForest reported the Library emPloyees will be working on community projects during the closure. She noted this would serve two purposes: Benefit the community by providing needed services and drawing positive attention to the Library. DeForest reported on an impending merger between OCLC and WLN databases. DeForest anticipates the merger to be a good thing for the Library. She noted the Alaska State Library is in favor of the merger. DeForest reported employee Julie Niederhauser will be going to Anchorage on Thursday, November 5, 1998 to attend training. Training will be an introduction to statewide database services soon to be available on the Intemet. Brenckle inquired if all users would have access to this new database via SLED. DeForest replied yes, the database will be on-line. DeForest commented she would like to request a new NT server and router at the next budget session. Chairman Peters inquired about the approximate cost. DeForest replied around $20,000. Brenckle inquired if that was an annual or one time cost. DeForest noted that was just to purchase the equipment. She further noted that is the type of item for which the Universal Service Fund would provide partial credits. DeForest reported the carpet installers had been in and had discussed their intentions for moving the books and shelves. DeForest commented they are planning on shrink wrapping a shelf at a time with the books still on them. She noted the individual shelves are not freestanding units and will fall apart when removed from the main bookshelf. Councilman Moore inquired if there was anything in the RFP regarding how the shelves and books were supposed to be moved. DeForest replied she did not know. DeForest noted she was having employees Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 2 charting location of shelves and books. Councilman Moore suggested the Library take pictures before the move starts. be Friends of the Library Heus commented the 50th Anniversary Committee reported they were in the process of making an invitation list for a March 7, 1999 tea-type event. Heus reported invitations would be ordered within the week. She requested suggestions on whom, from the past, might need to be invited. Heus noted Friends of the Library will be providing 50th anniversary stickers for the Library to use on correspondence and such. Heus reported the fall book sale earned proceeds of approximately $1,500. Heus commented the raffle was a tremendous success. She noted they anticipate profits of $14,000 - $15,000 from the $30,461 taken in. Heus reported Betsy and Steve Arbelovsky, winners of the grand prize, were quite pleased. Heus reported the Joint Committee now has a new name, the Library Improvement Committee. Heus commented artwork from the Nikiski school children was being considered for the new Library banner. Heus noted the Friends of the Library will be providing dessert at the upcoming December Open House. Heus reported the next Friends of the Library meeting will be on December 7, 1998. Heus reported author Alan Poynor donated five copies of his new book, Of Moose and Men, A Skewed Look at Life in Alaska, to Friends of the Library. She noted Friends of the Library were considering hosting an author signing. OLD BUSINESS a. Joint Committee Chairman Peters noted the new name is the Library Improvement Committee. O'Reilly reported on the Library Improvement Committee's meeting with the City Manager and the Mayor. O'Reilly reported the City still thinks the expansion is needed and outside money Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 3 be needs to be brought in to help pay for expansion. He also noted the City would like the Library Improvement Committee to seek Council support more actively. O'Reilly reported the next step for the Library Improvement Committee is to review expansion needs and provide a Holt System report. He further reported the City Manager and Mayor would like to see preliminary schematic drawings. Councilman Moore commented he hoped the Committee would not spend too much time on the Holt Study, he noted most of the work done on the Holt Study created for the bond issue should still be valid. Rodes reported on the Library Improvement Committee meeting with the City. She noted the Council would feel more secure if the City Attorney approved the RFP. Rodes noted Margaret Simon had referred to "re-submitting" to Public Works, Rodes was not aware of it being submitted in the first place. Discussion ensued regarding Public Works. Heus pointed out since the architect working on the estimate was hired by Public Works, that might have been considered a submittal. Councilman Moore suggested the Committee contact Council members to garner support for the expansion. Moore noted the existing schematic drawings for the expansion were probably adequate. Heus commented she felt there was not Council backing on the previous two issues the Library brought before them. O'Reilly noted he felt the City Manager and Mayor were both helpful and supportive. Chairman Peters commented on an article in the paper described the expansion as 16,000 square feet and the cost estimate of $3 million was being based on that square footage. He further commented if the project is only 15,400 square feet, rounding up to 16,000 is inaccurate. Chairman Peters stated if it were going to be rounded it would be more accurate to round it down to 15,000 square feet. Patron Survey Chairman Peters commented City Council would be considering a survey at the following evening's Council Meeting. Chairman Peters noted the City Clerk had suggested submitting some questions the Library would like to have on the survey. Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 4 A lengthy discussion ensued regarding which questions the Library Commission would like to submit. The following questions were determined: Have you, or your family, used the Library in the last 12 months? Were you satisfied or dissatisfied with the services you received? · How could the Library better serve you? The Library Commission has determined the need for expansion to best serve the community needs. How should this be funded? Increased property tax. Increased sales tax. Bonds. Other, be specific. · Removal of Question #27. RODF~ MOVED TO ACCEPT THE QUESTIONS AS READ AND ASKED THE CHAIR TO PRE~EI~IT THEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL. RODF~ ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. HEUS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED. 7. NEW BUSINESS December Open House Chairman Peters verified the Open House would be Sunday, December 13, 1998 from 12'00 p.m. - 4'00 p.m. He commented it would be a catered event with the dessert provided by the Friends of the Library. Brenckle inquired who would be providing the catering and who was paying for it. Director DeForest responded The Chase Is Over would be doing the catering and the City would be paying for it. Holt Revisited -- Back to the Drawing Board Chairman Peters commented he felt this issue had already been discussed under Item 6a. Chairman Peters added the Library Improvement Committee should coordinate with Director DeForest to determine what new technology is lacking from the old Holt Survey. Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 5 ® Heus commented a book she was reading, Libraries of the. Future, had a lot of good ideas for spatial considerations, particularly patron use of space. Forbes suggested the original Committee Members for the expansion get together to address the Holt Survey. Chaiman Peters determined there would be a meeting of Committee Members and volunteers on Monday, November 16, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS / ~UESTIONS Commissioner Brown commented she was very pleased with today's meeting and with the City's cooperation toward the expansion. Commissioner Forbes congratulated the Friends of the Library for the wonderful job they have done. Forbes commented she liked the article in the Paper. She stated she would like to another one on the re- carpeting. Forbes commented a classmate had told her the Library needs more space and had suggested charging non-residents of the City for usage. Forbes commented that was an interesting suggestion and might warrant action. Director DeForest commented on attempts to charge user fees in the past. DeForest stated it had not worked out well and had resulted in a lot of animosity from the patrons including Library cards being thrown at employees. Commissioner O'Reilly stated it was a good meeting again, many different points were brought up. Councilman Moore reported the Five Iron lot sale generated over $200,000. Moore commented those lots remaining unsold could be bought through the City Manager for the minimum bid of $34,500. Commissioner Rodes stated it had been a succession of good meetings. Chairman Peters stated it was a good meeting and congratulated the Friends of the Library. Chairman Peters stated he had received another flyer from The Exchange on their 1999 edition of The Alaskan Funds Guide. He noted the cost was $64.00 plus postage. INFORMATION Kenai City Council Action Agenda of October 7 and 21, 1998. Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 6 10. ADJOURNMENT O'REILLY MOVED TO ADJOURN. MOTION SECONDED BY BRENCKLE. MEETING ADJOURNED 9:32 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Alison Rapp Contract Secretary Kenai Advisory Library Commission November 3, 1998 Page 7 CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ B~CKGROUND AND PERSONAL D~T]% - C~NDID~TES FOR ~PPOINT TO COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS D~%TE: 11-4-98 NAME: Melinda Haring Resident of the City of Kenai? yes CITY OF KEN]%I MENT ~ i NOV How long? 16 years Residence Address 1121 Walnut Ave. Mailing Address Telephone No. 283-3897 _ Telephone No. _ Business Address EMPLOYER: Job Title ' NAME OF SPOUSE: Current membership in organizations: Treasurer of Natural President ' Helpers, Treasurer of ' Society, Girl Scouts Past organizational memberships Language Committee Student Representative to Dis ' communtit librar needs s improvements (for exam le this t · t t and enjoyed re resentin m ents. Signature A PUBLIC LIBRARY IN SERVICE SINCE 1949 163 MAIN STREET LOOP KENAI, ALASKA 99611 (907) 283-4378 REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1998 Circulation Adult Juvenile Easy Books Fiction 1926 Non-Fiction 2037 Periodicals 91 446 346 1954 365 Kits Puzzles Phonodiscs Cassettes Videos 23 3 -- 189 699 Miscellaneous 851 Total Printed Materials .. 7165 Total Circulation .. 8930 Additions Docs Adult Juvenile Easy Books AV Gifts 2 38 3 Purchases 21 3 Total Additions .. 74 Imerlibrary Loans Ordered Received Returned Books 27 28 18 Interlibrary Loans by our Library .. Books 42 Volunteers Number.. 21 Total Hours.. 198 Income Fines and Sale Books Lost or Damaged Books Xerox $2,300.70 204.10 411.50 Total Income for October, 1998 ...... $2,916.30 > ._! I-- .,-. ,'r" l_ ~ 0 0 -,-, ,.L Ld $ C I-- -,-, I~ Z C 0 UJ SL) W '-~ r- C O'r !- > r3 ,- > · ,--t .,-iI'-..- n) IF., rO ,-, i ~1' ('O i~.'1 · · · --' t F- O L) Ld :.'2, (','] :.il,.-, IF, 0') rdcl' ,r, u C .1.1 .,..i L3 U '.-. r' 'IiU U) (',) ,~ ,D I."U r.o F.O ,S, ~ :D ,..'r, i.[, (%1 03 ~ ['--. ['lj _J 00~ bJ ~IC LIJ ~0 'd ~ .~ I Z r' OOT Lil 0 0 u u .,.-I .~.~ ..~ LO rr] ! ~ 0 ~ 0 O) IL! .rd ~7, nj .--t ,£, OJ F.'il L'O ,S., ,.D ~ !"- !"-~ ['-- F- u ,Z. .~.~ "~., I'- ('0 .rd b-., I'-- oJ Z Ld ,-~ 'v' F- ZL)~ ~ :>- U) ~-~ U) I-- I bJ F- '-~ I-- :Z'"-'q: k) i-- rJ ~Q..z. L) ~. 0 1,1 t,) ~ Z ~ 0 ~.::]:: bJ Z · .'Z_ 0 r_.q 0 .% f:E r..) [g f,q. ~rJ :Z:] 0 03 ~ ,.£, :Z, (LI ,--,ed b3 ~ ro [-- b') h-., ,J:, h'., ,Z, r-- ,:S', '£' [U · · = [ .... :S, Ir:, oJ ,~. 03 r-- · -~ t I · --' f .... OJ,S, OJ .--, r-..r.. r:) CU ~-~ ['ri I.,'] p.- f-..~ 0) · ~ ,.-r., ,Z, ,T, -~ ["- ~ ,7, r-- .tO 03 ,CE LO · -~ b.! Er.] ~ F- F- U3 ~ F- CO Z !]_O W ~ _! !10 _1 ~-~ !_.~ ~ 03 ,-~ ~- ..',"'i I--'>- U']~ .~..'.:]' !:::3 ~ L,.'] !±. !0 ~- ~ !.d .O ~ ~ fsi Z ~ Ld i.~l ..... _1 i-- ~ S~ Z> ~ Z> -"- IL) L.L [r~ ~ _J I- _J ~ .:r~ i-- Li. ~O ~ ~ ~__ "/ X _J I-- .,-, 0 0~, CL. o.,-, W W c Z c: 0 W l >.. >. 0 0:Il- L1 Lfl F- L) F- J I F- O I-- u or-- ,:r, ,~, ,.-, El, L3 ,T, CO -.-, ,, · (0 ,*, 0.1 . · · Itt. Ii ! "-' 03 C,') b'9 --.., ,.1, CO,r, CU ,'-'-' ~ CU ,£, [nj b'., ','"' 03 ::~' ~ b~ :.£, ~ CLi :~' ,-., CO ,.D ~ ~ ,-4 I ! I i. I CU ELI ~ LC, f .... ,£, p- L1 0 O) h'., I)3 03 ,7, b-., CO .C!', ,~: 03 b3 ,£, 03 OJ , ,.:, ,..'r, CO '.C, Ct, {.:.0 CLI .--, 'S; 03 ,.?, ,£, Ld I-- 0 0 "," F- OW 0 Z W ~Z ,_d ,::E ::Z r_] U3 < LO W ,.-, F- OZ Ld J IW ~.-~ Z _JO rj~ :Z ~ W F- p- iD W ,-, Ld i:l] ..~ l-- W Z. W ';£ _-3. U] ~ q2 ,-., [".l b. ~ ~ W ~ EO W r.j Li. ,'.:.12 LJ ".." [.J "-. W 0 LO b_ I..O r.O O_ 0 F- ~ >- i~ '--, ~ ~ t~ L:! '..-" Ld 0 r._q ¢.]: '.~ Z ~ ~ u~ J W ,3_ _1 LO I-- [.J 0 ~ ~ J !:0 .~ Z ~ ~ O.'] J ..J ~1 .,~ Z: l.u.Z ~.i J ~ ~ W J r...1 iSJ t.r.:: Ld ~ ~ ~J3 .~ Fr' ~L Z ~ 0 bg,-, iD ~ ~C W I~ ~ 0 ,-, O3 F- b_ r~ Z:: 0 Z_Z J~ ~ I--n ~Q _~'....' l~._j ,'r' ,._ >, O O -,-' EL O. ','"' Z ~- 0 'd 0~ .~. c- O O'T 1.11 O lll t.0 U1 tJ u ,~, .,-i I-- ,£, LT', ru ,S, Cd IL'O r-- ..'=/' t'O f"' b". 03 ,-.4 '7' ,£, OJ t"U r._l rd ,-, I'-- ---, ,_~, Ct, ~, ,.0 ,~, O) P.- b'., C:) C., ,Z, tiJ ~ O ,-, IM --, b-., ~ 'S, i"- 03 ,S, .-d' 17..,) ---, · -4 ~,j . ,-4 ,:J', r.:] 170 ~ b-., r,) r.,] O] b-., 03 ,£, ,£, ,..:£, ~ (,'] .r,) ,T' · . · · . · ~ · = . . · , · · · · Iii P- OJ '--, O] [ .... rd l'!J .~ t0 ,7" 'S, ,T, ['- O] r,3 ,~, i I I I j I u 0 1--4 Ir, ,~, --~ .17,) 03 b'-, '%, l'-J:~;, fY! ILl ti', FI.I :t-, lO :~.' · ,...4 ~?.. ;~, ..-:t :.:.t' i.'!.! !'q t't.! 'Z~ N') .,..4 U'~ rd ~ .--4 LT, ['" l?l (".'] r,.. ['lj :~.., L.d~ LdZ ..-. .:_rZ 1;'3 ~ O 03 ! <Z .~- ,£, =] '-' ,---, ~_! Z ..... I--F- i ID ~ Ld rjq. fJ ..-J- Z fi3 ~ Z Lil .,...4 0::: .,-4 Z D.1 f'.J Lg. 0 Z O L.d ,-, LdO t-- >-ELI-- ~ .J Fr' c'r ~Z IJ ~ O .~ '~ ":l Id f'-.J Z Z L) 0 ~ LL L9 ._J ~ Z ~ Z J =) Ldb.. ~ O LdWI- LdM O I-- O O r.,q Lr)in u') 'v' :~ >- _j ! ._..q ...j 'v' ,.'., _.J <I: ,Zi::: ~ Ld i. rZ I,- cZ L1 Z d.: ,.1:. ~.~ L! W I ~ '-:, :Z Z Z Z O O 03 i.P.. tO f_O 3 Z .';::- _1 !-- ..-, ,'r' !_ >. 0 0 -,-, WW c i-- .,-, E~ 7 C 0 W WO W >- >. OOZE ~.! Z m Ij.J c r'- L1 ':S, LJ3 'S' Ii-., Ct, ~-, '.g O) -.d' ti-., ,.~., 'S, ~ ,'C., r.O rd ,-, roro I rd ,~, LiSt Cd OJ i ,'-, I t ! I I --' I I r- r" (_1 ! · · · · · · · · · · · · , ,S,. lTI..J ,S, ,~ LI~. CO Lib 0:) ,~.., ,£, ,]", ,S.., 'D CO ~, ,~, tlJ ~ CU CO ,..L~ ,£~ ,&"t 03 I -'-~-..~ I I I i --~ I I I i-- Of''. w Ot C r' u iz t:._J ,-d ~ ro ~ ~ 0 iZi I-.. ..'m' bJ ~ :::- --' W ~ Z I M T i <~ "..." ,.T, O IJI ILO t,.Ti .I-- ','"r' J M ~,3_ U.! / --- W M bJ M I '--' Uq. 23 l~ _J J Y LL L~ U l~W(_g I M W -J ~-0 Z ~--~ ~' ~ ~ ~ J ,l..,-4 _J T ,-~ ~ _1 Ld W W 0 ~ !zI Z ::::3 _J :C 0 Z ::3 Ld ,'.Z '! · bJ £r..: , !-- Z _1 ZOO 'dj Ld Z b') ~ Z ,--, ,-, ,.Z ,.-, ~ r.O rOOZOW W Ld ~ Fr' ~-, <Z bJ i"..J Z !0 ~ .',--~--"LO Z~-OOOl WZ~. ,.£, ~ M .-, --' i--- !-- ! co r..3 .~ ['..J ~ ~ WO~- ~ZWZ_IZ) ~ Lr,,r,i b3 'v' ~ >.. UZ<Z .~ W -~ ,.'-r' ~ W rr' i-- ~ % % Z Z 0 0 U':! t~l r.O CO ::D Z: ."- -~ r-0 :~ 00T O u .-' O r~ u ,~, .~ .ri ¢- C'- P*' LI-; Lt';~ 1"3 I U~ .-4 t Cql ti'., t'LI I 'S."*-'~ 0.1 ,~, I7.¢] ? I I ! b-.' ,-4 ! ,S, 0)~ ~ b-., r,) £0 03 bO r,) ,£~ ,.D ,.D · · · · · · · · · · · · ,. . I · · fl.l r"' t'U --~ CO i' .... .rd fiJ .~ 113 LT, 'S', i I ~ r[.i .-4 -,.-[ (!J ,-4 ! b-' -4 ,-4 Cd O) t I ! I ! i t i.i. W I:0 ,:t', ,S, i Lt --4 ,£~ ,?', I"'-' r3 O) 'S, b-., -'? f.'U r .... £~ ~7', ~ I:d ,--J r'-- ~ ,.s, ,0 ["- flj ,~, Dj i'A ~ CIJ F- i_1 O 0.'t I..-.. ' ,,..d ,'r' WZ .... · 3..1 ! <:..1: H- ,£, Z3 "-" ,'-", j.2~ i--- t.- Z ..J Z '-' I-F-' i --- ~ -._-Z. Z 0 ::3 W ~ tJ ..-t' ('!'J I.~ JJ..J W Z I'j~. ~ Z I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z rj.'! r-.J 03 f.O 03 0 Z 0 W H Ld 0 '~ :::- Ldld W ~ l:~ ~ _iL)_.I !.LJ ~4 ir' CK ':Z 1,1 _J IO LL ~ 4[ Id f'..J Z Z ~ ~3 bS ,t" LK ,~ !-- i:~ ,~ ~ !.3 ::* .Z o") ~ ~ t~ ~ .d L~ Z W Z -J :_3 '-:, ~ ",' Z I...- 0 0 r jO !:0 Ln. LO _J f.3 .....j 'v' ,'., _J cT_ '.Z ~J W ~ t.- cZ U Z ~ ,.'[ ~ U W T ~ ,-:, :.:Z '".'" Z Z 0 0 0') [..n.. 0") LO 2) ~ >- I Z c 00.T ~ ~ f_,) t~, ~ 0 >.. 0 ~0 F- LbO] 4-, 0 r~ -J I ,C.', b-., b,, ,£, c ..c c t- O ld Lq O'l I~I ' '.-?, .,-I O) [0 ',.£' [,] ~OJ '~' ,S, ,T, (0 LJ3 ('0 ~ LJ3 ! ~ ! I ,C., b-.! i'U LJ3 · = , · ,5-', h3 :~, ~ bg hZ, ! b-: ~ OJ 03 _j ~ ,'r' LE L73 n >. 0 !... :11 '~.. +-' 0 LI1 +-, _1 I F- O C .C L) ,.T, ,~., ~-~ r- KENAI PARKS ~k RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 1 ~9 8 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CHAIRMAN RICHARD HULTBERG ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/h ROLL CALL ITEM 2. AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3' APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 1, 1998 ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5' OLD BUSINESS ao Cemetery Sign/Wrought Iron Fence Parks Tour Cunningham Park Expansion ITEM 6' NEW BUSINESS ao ITEM 7: Lease Agreement/Kenai Peninsula Oilers Baseball Club, Inc. DIRECTOR'S REPORT a, City League Basketball Facility Usage Teen Center Events ITEM 8' OUESTIONS/h COMMENTS ITEM 9' CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 10: PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 11. INFORMATION a, Council Action Agenda -- October 7 and 21, 1998. Beautification Committee Minutes of October 13, 1998 LWCF Stateside Grant Program ITEM 12: ADJOURNMENT ® ® 0 ® Se KENAI PARKS/l~ RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA NOVEMBER 5, 1998-- 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS VICE CHAIRMAN JACK CASTIMORE *** MIRUTES *** CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL Vice Chairman Castimore called the meeting to order at 7'00 p.m. Members present' Jack Castimore, Kelly Gifford, Tim Wisniewski, Matthew Peters, Ron Yamamoto Members absent: Richard Hultberg, Dale Sandahl Also present: Councilman Duane Bannock, Director Bob Frates, Contract Secretary Alison Rapp APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice Chairman Castimore requested Mike Baxter and Don Pearson be added to the discussion of Item 6a. AGENDA WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADDITION AT ITEM 6A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- October 1, 1998 Gifford requested her comments under Item 7 be changed to: "... noted how good the clear cut looked around Kenai Middle School and Kenai Central High School." Minutes were approved as amended. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None OLD BUSINESS Cemetery Sign/Wrought Iron Fence Director Frates commented he had received a phone call from a woman in the community that loves the sign and would hate to see it leave. Frates suggested the Commission could, for the time being, frame the existing sign with wrought iron. He noted this would serve two purposes; tie in sign with wrought iron fencing and provide a framework for a future sign. Gifford felt framing the existing sign might tone it down. commented he felt the colors of the sign were offensive. Peters Frates Parks & Recreation Commission November 5, 1998 Page 1 Gifford felt framing the existing sign might tone it down. Peters commented he felt the colors of the sign were offensive. Frates commented money had been spent to build the existing sign and there were people in the community that like the sign. Gifford commented her main concern was the fence. ~Visniewski commented the existing sign will probably wear out in 3 - 4 years and could be replaced then. Vice Chairman Castimore suggested school groups might be able to construct the sign if the City provided the raw materials. He noted KPC had a welding program. Peters stated he had spoken to the welding instructor, Mr. Burke, at KHS. Peters noted Mr. Burke expressed an interest in the project but would like to see an outline prior to making any commitments. Frates noted estimates he received started at $50.00/foot for a basic fence ranging to $90.00/foot for minor detailing. Castimore inquired what the cost of raw materials would be. Frates replied he had received estimates for fabricated fences only, not for the cost of the raw materials. Wisniewski commented he had seen aluminum signs that looked just as good as wrought iron. He noted wrought iron is a lot of work to maintain once it starts to age. Wisniewski further noted aluminum would probably be half the price. Frates commented he would get quotes for aluminum to present at the next Commission meeting. b. Parks Tour Director Frates commented it was a good tour. Discussion ensued regarding the tour. Wisniewski commented the Bernie Huss Trail was really coming along. Cunningham Park Expansion Councilman Bannock noted the money for the engineering was approved by City Council and the project would be moving along. 6. NEW BUSINESS Lease Agreement/Kenai Peninsula Oilers Baseball Club, Inc. Also Present: Mike Baxter, 619 Fir, Kenai, Alaska Don Pearson, 236 W. Marydale, Soldotna, Alaska Director Frates noted the lease with the Oilers is a 55-year lease and will not be up for renewal until 2031. Gifford commented she Parks & Recreation Commission November 5, 1998 Page 2 would like improvements made along the Tinker Lane side of the park. Pearson commented they have painted the fence there several times. Gifford suggested clearing the brush out. Director Frates suggested general landscaping. Baxter commented they were trying to preserve that area in a natural condition to provide a buffer to the adjacent neighborhood. Baxter noted the brush is small trees. Baxter stated the Baseball Club would do the general landscaping and sprucing up. He noted they would need direction from the Commission regarding what direction to take. Yamamoto suggested forming a task force to go over and look at the park and formulate suggestions. Councilman Bannock commented once the Commission has a plan they can present it to the Oilers' Board. Frates noted he would set up the tour. Baxter commented they did not have year-around maintenance. Discussion ensued regarding having Parks & Recreation performing the maintenance. Councilman Bannock suggested the Commission direct Parks & Recreation to perform the maintenance and request City Administration to address funding of extra manpower required. DIRECTOR'S REPORT City League Basketball Director Frates reported there are 16 men's teams and six women's teams. He noted the number of teams was limited by the available gym time. b. Facility Usage Frates reported facility usage was up last month. He attributed the increased usage to the closure of a facility in the North. c. Teen Center Events Frates reported the teen events went well. There were 75 children involved with the presentation and skit. He noted an additional 100 children showed up for the Middle School dance. Frates commented credit needs to be given to the Elks and Chuck Smalley for all their efforts. Frates reported there was a high school dance the following week with 60 -65 kids in attendance. Frates noted the Elks did a great job on this event, too. Yamamoto commented a lot of kids came Parks & Recreation Commission November 5, 1998 Page 3 some of these events might not have a big draw at first, but over time it will work. 7. OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Commissioner Yamamoto noted Alan Norville had recently lost his son in a tragic accident. Commissioner Gifford thanked Frates for his continuing work on the iron fence. Commissioner Wisniewski stated he really appreciated what the lighting crew has done with the lights around the city. Commissioner Peters commented he works across from the Teen Center. He noted they have a problem with the teens coming into their business to play the video games. Peters suggested updating the video games at the Teen Center. Frates requested Peters suggest names of specific games and he would forward the request to Vic Tyler, Tyler Vending. 8. CORRESPONDENCE-- None 9. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None 10. INFORMATION Council Action Agenda -- October 7 and 21, 1998 Beautification Committee Minutes -- October 13, 1998 LWCF Stateside Grant Program 12. ADJOURNMENT GIFFORD MOVED FOR ADJOURNMENT. MOTION. PETERS SECONDED THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Alison Rapp Contract Secretary Parks & Recreation Commission November 5, 1998 Page 4 AGENDA CITY OF KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS October 28, 1998 - 7:00 p.m. http'//www, c i. kenai, ak. us le CALL TO ORDER: a. Roll Call b. Agenda Approval c. Approval of Minutes: October 14, 1998 d. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Commission and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commission Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. 2. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT: e CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ98-49--Preliminary Plat--Spruce Grove Subdivision- Murphy's Replat 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ98-50--An application for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Bed & Breakfast for the property described as Government Lot 176 (101 Highbush Lane), Kenai, Alaska. Application submitted by Rita Botelho, P.O. Box 615, Kenai, Alaska. b. PZ98-51--An application for a Variance Permit for rear yard setbacks for the property described as Lot l-A, Spruce Grove Subdivision, Hales Addition, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. Application submitted by Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. c. PZ98-52--An application for an Encroachment Permit for the side yard for the property described as Lot l-A, Spruce Grove Subdivision, hales Addition, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. Application submitted by Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. d. PZ98-53--a resolution of the Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission recommending to City Council the changing of certain existing street names. Streets include those streets whose pre-directionals were changed to post-directionals in 1996. For example, Willow Street North would be changed to North Willow Street. e. PZ98-54--a resolution of the Planning & Zoning Commission recommending the Kenai Municipal Code at 12.25.030 be amended to set clear standards for what constitutes a junk vehicle. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ98-56--Landscape/Site Plan Review--8080 Kenai Spur Highway. Application Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Page 2 October 28, 1998 submitted by Deanna L. Moore, Moore's Landscaping, P.O. Box 944, Kenai, Alaska. b. Discussion--Amendment to KMC 14.20.280--Public Hearings and Notifications 6. OLD BUSINESS: 7. CODE ENFORCEMENT: 8. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 9. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 10. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. KPB Notice of Public Hearing on Petition to Vacate - 11/9/98 b. Memo from KPB Planning Departmem dated 10/15/98 c. KPB Plat Committee Action of 10/12/98 d. Memo dated 10/15/98 canceling November 11, 1998 Meeting 11. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 12. ADJOURNMENT: CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 0.8, 1998 - 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY HALL CHAIRMAN: CARL GLICK *** MINUTES *** 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairman Glick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. a. Roll Call Members Present: Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Teresa Wemer-Quade, Ron Goecke, Barb Nord Members Absent: Art Graveley Also Present: Councilman Smalley, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull, Contract Secretary Alison Rapp be Agenda Approval GOECKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY NORD. Chairman Glick asked for objections to unanimous consent. GOECKE MOVED TO AMEND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA ADDING THE HANDOUT RECEIVED BY DAVID HALES. NORD SECONDED THE MOTION. AGENDA WAS APPROVED AS AMENDED. Approval of Minutes: October 14, 1998 GOECKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 14, 1998 AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MOTION SECONDED BY NORD. THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSED. de Consent Agenda * All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Commission and will be Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 1 approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commission Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequences on the agenda as part of the General Orders. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT: -- None 3. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: PZ98-49--PreHmina~ Plat--Spruce Grove Subdivision - Murphy's Replat. MOTION: NORD MOVED TO APPROVE PZ98-49. THE MOTION. BRYSON SECONDED Chairman Glick requested comments from the staff. Kebschull recommended the Commission review the Variance and Encroachment Permit applications (Items 4b and 4c) prior to consideration of the plat. She commented the plat should note an encroachment exists on Lot 1-B and an encroachment will be created on Lot 1-C. MOTION: BRYSON MOVED TO HEAR THE CONSIDERATION AFTER ITEM 4C. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE: BRYSON YES NORD YES WERNER-qUADE YES GLICK YES GOECKE YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PZ98-50 -- An application for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Bed/h Breakfast for the property described as Government Lot 176 ( 101 Highbush Lane), Kenai, Alaska. Application submitted by Rita Botelho, P.O. Box 615, Kenai, Alaska. MOTION: Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 2 be GOECKE MOVED TO APPROVE PZ98-50 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BED AND BREAKFAST. MOTION SECONDED BY BRYSON. Chairman Glick opened the Public Hearing and asked that testimony be limited to three minutes unless it is a prepared written statement. Those giving testimony were asked to state their name and address for the record and sign the sheet provided on the podium. Verbatim Begins Dick Morgan, 1401 Lawton Drive, Kenai, Alaska I own two lots which is immediately adjacent to the property in question. All I want to say is I think it is a good idea and I am all for it. Chairman Glick: Thank you Mr. Morgan. Verbatim Ends Kebschull drew attention to the Building Official's comments which recommended approval contingent on the building permit and the completion of construction. Bryson inquired if the staff's recommendation was incorporated into the motion. Goecke agreed to incorporate staffs suggestions into the motion. Bryson concurred. , VOTE: WERNER-(~UADE YES BRYSON YES GO~~ YES GLICK YES NORD YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. PZ98-51 -- An application for a Variance Permit for rear yard setbacks for the property described as Lot l-A, Spruce Grove Subdivision, Hales Addition, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. Application submitted by Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. MOTION: BRYSON MOVED TO APPROVE PZ98-51. 'BY GOECKE. MOTION SECONDED Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 3 Chairman Glick opened the Public Hearing. Those giving testimony were asked to state their name and address for the record and sign the sheet provided on the podium. Verbatim Begins Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska The reason why I am asking for the 5' variance is because., um.. if there was a house to be built with the.. um.. garage that's already on the back piece of this property. And what I want to do is, if there's a house to ever be built in there and this property line that I am also asking for at the same time.., is to be able to go from the front yard to the back yard without having to go around the block. And.. um.. by giving five more feet to this second lot it would allow that and give a nice lot for both pieces. Chairman GHck: Any questions for the applicant? Thank you. Anyone else in the public wishing to speak to this item? Okay, seeing none we will bring it back to the Commissioners. Verbatim Ends Kebschull noted the staff had no additional comments but this may not satisfy the requirements for the variance based on the guidelines and the Municipal Code of 14.20.180(c)(1)(2). Bryson inquired if it was included as an excerpt in the packet. Chairman Glick directed him to "analysis" on page one of the Staff Report. Bryson commented he felt the situation had three times a frontage situation the owner did not create and that it was a special situation that normally not addressed in the code. Bryson noted he felt it was somewhat unfair to have a 25' setback from the roadway on three sides and a 20' setback in the rear. Bryson commented the request for a deviation was reasonable to approve. Bryson further commented 5' side setbacks are intended to prevent damage to neighbors' property. VOTE: GO~~ YES WERNER-QUADE YES NORD YES GLICK YES BRYSON YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. PZ98-52 -- An application for an Encroachment Permit for the side yard for the property described as Lot l-A, Spruce Grove Subdivision, Hales Addition, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 4 Application submitted by Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska. MOTION: NORD MOVED TO APPROVE PZ98-21. BY BRYSON. MOTION SECONDED Chairman Glick opened the Public Hearing. Those giving testimony were asked to state their name and address for the record and sign the sheet provided on the podium. Verbatim Begins Marlena Murphy, 1806 4th Avenue, Kenai, Alaska I own this piece of property., urn.. The reason why we are askin§ for an encroachment cause., urn.. it's real close to the property line and ri§ht now it's just a shop. It has a fiat roof and up here that is not too §ood with snow loads and that. What we're wantin§ to do is just put a peaked roof on it and.. urn.. the overhan§ would not be anymore than what the fiat roof represents ri§ht now. And.. urn.. it wouldn't be any closer to the property line. And it's just for maintenance of the buildin§ and.. urn.. realization that it really needs it. Chairman Glick: anything on it? So you wouldn't be putting a second story or Murphy: Oh no it's just going to be a peaked roof. Right now it's "fiat and we have to get up there every winter and really hustle the snow off and everything. It is just to make it easier in the snow. An attic is all I see. Bryson: I am looking at the .... Chairman Glick: Ms. Murphy? He wants to ask you a question. Murphy: Oh I am sorry. Bryson: I am looking at the plat that created Lot lA that you are now subdividing? Murphy: Yeah. Bryson: Um.. there is a concrete block building shown in the rear and I assume that is the same structure. The scale has it being about 2' from the property line, is that the case? Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 5 Murphy: Yeah, it is very close. That was that way when we got the piece of property. It has always been that way. We didn't build it that way. Bryson' Do you know what its offset is? Murphy: It is probably about 2' or fight in there. We found one post yesterday on the right side on Jefferson Street there. Wasn't sure about the one on Evergreen, but it runs very close to the property line. Bryson: You weren't able to find that lot comer that's fight at... Murphy: I think I did, it's uh re-bar down in the ground and the one over on Jefferson Street was a... um... aluminum cap. $o I assume those are the two comers. And we eyeballed it yesterday and it's 2 - 2 1/2 feet from the edge of the building. Bryson' There's a letter that was handed out prior to the meeting here. I think it was a letter from your neighbor and he indicated that it was several inches away. Murphy: No, no. The building's more than several inches. The roofline is closer, but the building wall is not. That is why I state that the new roof will not go anymore than what the roof is existing fight now. The fiat roof is fight now.., the new roof is peaked and it would even be away down further than what the fiat roof is sticking out. If anything, it would be less. Chairman GHck: Thank you. Anyone else in the public wishing to speak to this item? (indication from the gallery) Chairman Glick: Yes, sir. State your name and address for the record and write it on the sheet of paper. Dave Hales, 404 Evergreen, Kenai, Alaska Marlena Murphy and I share a common property line. Um... I wrote the letter concemin§., um.. my concern.. My main concern is that in the future if this property is sold or deeded to someone else, that I don't want this encroachment permit, that say is granted, to open the door to that structure being developed into a residence by building a second story onto the structure... Except what its primary use is fight now which is a garage and a storage area. Marlena and I have been great neighbors for years and good friends and they are wonderful people. And.. um.. I am not Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 6 concerned about what Marlena wants to do, which is fine with me, I have no objection to a roof being put on the structure. But if they were to sell this property and have a Variance Permit, um.. Encroachment Permit granted, I don't want to see it open the door for that building to be expanded any further really than it already is. If it is granted, I would like to see at least two stipulations' Any second story type additions prohibited and any future addition or expansion to the structure will only be allowed on the south end of the structure, which is the farthest away from my property line. The building itself is probably a foot and a half from the line. The roof is about an inch from my property line. In 1987 I subdivided my property and refinanced. And during the.. um.. survey the surveyor noticed that the roof was actually on my property by several inches, almost a foot. So.. um.. what I did, I decided I'd talk to Marlena about it. She didn't know about it either. They bought the property with the building on it. The original survey apparently was in error, and so I deeded Marlena Murphy 175' of my lot about 9" wide so that the roof would then be on their property. That's how close this building is to the lot line. It's on the line. Right now the roof is about 1 1/2~ to 2~ from the property line. So, that's my main objection. It is right on the line. My concern isn't Marlena Murphy, it's a future owner of this property and what they might do with it. I feel it is a valid concern. I feel if someone built a two story residence on my.. on that property, it would really hurt my property value and make it very difficult to sell my property, I~specially imagine showing it to someone and they~l say what's that and I~l say that's the neighbOrs. You know, they would be right in my back yard. I would be living in a fishbowl. And it would make my property extremely hard to market and get a fair value for it. That's about all that I have to say. Ch~im~ Glick: Questions, does anybody have any questions? Bz~'~e~: You indicated that., ah.. you.. ah.. deeded a portion of the property to the adjacent lot. Is that incorporated into this plat? I~l~: That is the plat that you are looking at. The one, the.. ah.. B~,~o~: It is a change from the plat I am looking at? I~l~' It would be, I think it's the same plat you have, this plat, I think you have reflects the change in the lot line. Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 7 Bryson: And that reflects that 9' that she now has? Hales: Yes it does. It reflects the 9" that she now has. I have a copy of the preliminary plat that the surveyor originally did when he pointed out to me that the roof line was in fact over the property line. I have a blueprint that he ran for that and.. and.. I didn't want them to lose., to have to take off a foot of their roof. Plus my lender wouldn't refinance if my title had any kind of col.. or.. problem like this. I just deeded Marlena a quit claim deed to that strip of land. Bryson' That was subsequently incorporated into this plat? Hales: Yes. So right now at this moment the roof line does not extend over my property line. But it is probably w/thin 2' of it. Bryson: Do you have any problem with., urn.. in the case of a sloped roof of the snow dumping that direction across the lot line? Hales' No, I think they will probably build the slope the other way. And that would be no problem whatsoever. I have no objections to what she is asking. Chairman GHck: Okay, thank you very much. the public wishing to speak to this item? Anyone else in Debbie Sonberg, 410 Cinderella Street, Kenai, Alaska I have no particular opinion on that, but, as far as a variance.., doesn't a variance have to be, a variance or certain kinds of permits, conditional uses and so on have to completed within a year and they would not carry over automatically to another person if they weren't completed? Chairman Glick: If somebody else wanted to come in and build a second story or build it into a house they would have to come before us... Sonberg: ... reapply? Chairman Glick: ...and reapply, because they'd have to get a building permit and all that. (Ms. Sonberg is speaking over Chairman Glick) Sonberg: forever... Getting a variance doesn't give them license to... Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 8 Kebschull: No, an encroachment stays with the property, it's with the rifle. Chairman Glick: buildin§? But if they wanted to build an addition to the Kebschull: If they have an encroachment that does not limit them, they could build a second story. The encroachment permit allows them to obtain a building permit unless there's stipulations on that encroachment permit they can build. So, um, and those were the concerns that Mr. Hales voiced to me and we verified that with the building official. Because I often times have banks contact me to see if there is an encroachment permit on a... Chairman Gltck: ...But we could put that stipulation on here? Kebschull: Yes, and that would be my recommendation. Sonberg: I was just curious because I didn't know how that differed. Thank you. Bryson: This is a situation where it was an existing structure in the middle of a large tract when all these lots were created the building was shown. And presumably all the persons that ended up owning that property would have concurred in principle with the original subdivision. Ah, the building was an encroachment to the side setback at the time but it was acknowledged by both the Planning Commission and.. um.. by the fact of having to proof it and by the property owners because they bought the property. Chairman Glick: Okay, once again is there anyone else in the public wishing to speak to this item? Seeing none, we will bring it back to the commissioners. Verbatim Ends Kebschull recommended approval with Mr. Hales' requested contingencies as part of the resolution. Bryson commented the foundation did not appear on the preliminary plat and there was no evidence other than the application that there was a structure. MOTION TO AMEND: GOECKE MOVED TO AMEND THE PREVIOUS MOTION TO PZ98-52 FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO INCLUDE: BUILDING CANNOT BE ENLARGED AND NO FUTURE BUILDING PERMITS MAY BE ISSUED WITHOUT COMING BEFORE THIS BODY. BRYSON SECONDED THE MOTION. Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 9 Bryson inquired if the amendment included the roof construction currently being applied for. Goecke replied the roof would be included under the intent of the amendment. Kebschull commented the amendment might be misunderstood as written. She suggested it might be better to specify a second story may not be built. Kebschull also pointed out any construction on the south side could meet all setback requirements going that way. She expressed concern over limiting any future building permits. Discussion ensued regarding the pending amendment. MOTION TO AMEND: BRYSON MOVED TO AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO ITEM PZ98-52 TO INCLUDE: ' WITHIN THE AREA THAT BE ENCROACHING IN A NORMAL SETBACK SITUATION, NO ADDITIONAL INTERIOR AREA CAN BE CREATED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. GO~~ SECONDED THE MOTION Discussion continued regarding the wording of the amendments and the implications of such wordings. Bryson commented he was considering withdra~g his latest amendment. Kebschull noted it was the applicant's intention to only put a new roof on the structure. Kebschull commented it would be best if a limited encroachment could be issued. MOTION: BRYSON MOVED TO WITHDRAW THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT TO ITEM PZ98-52. GOECKE CONCURRED. Goecke commented he would like to withdraw his initial amendment to Item PZ98-52. Chairman Glick deferred the amendment to a vote. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: NORD NO GOECKE NO BRYSON NO GLICK NO WERNER-i~UADE NO GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION FAILED. MOTION TO AMEND: BRYSON MOVED TO AMEND ITEM PZ98-52 TO INCLUDE: THIS STRUCTURE IS GRANDFATHERED AS EVIDENCED BY Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 10 PRIOR PLATS, HOWEVER THE APPLICANT HAS STATED THEY WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE THE FLAT ROOF TO A PEAKED ROOF. THIS AMENDMENT LIMITS CONSTRUCTION TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROOF ONLY. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION. Bryson noted it is not an approval for trespass. Goecke agreed. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: NORD YES GOECKE YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES WERNER-~UADE YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. Chairman Glick inquired if there was anymore discussion prior to voting on the main motion for item PZ98-52 as amended. Hearing none a vote was called. VOTE ON AMENDED MOTION: BRYSON YES NORD YES WERNER-(~UADE YES GLICK YES GOECKE YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. PZ98-49--PreHmina~ Plat--Spruce Grove Subdivision - Murphy's Replat. Chairman Glick noted there was already a motion outstanding on this item. Bryson inquired if there was already a motion that specified existing structures be shown. MOTION TO AMEND: BRYSON MOVED TO AMEND ITEM PZ98-49 TO SHOW EXISTING PERMANENT STRUCTURF~. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: WERNER-(~UADE YES BRYSON YES GOECKE YES GLICK YES NORD YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 11 de Chairman Glick inquired if there was anymore discussion prior to voting on the plat PZ98-49 as amended. Hearing none a vote was called. VOTE ON AMENDED MOTION: GO~KE - YES WERNER-(~UADE YES NORD YES GLICK YES BRYSON YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. PZ98-53 -- A resolution of the Planning tk Zoning Commission recommending to City Council the changinE of certain extstinE street names. Streets include those streets whose pre-directionals were changed to post-directionals in 1996. For example, Willow Street North would be changed to North Willow Street. MOTION: WERNER-(~UADE MOVED TO PASS THE RESOLUTION PZ98- 53. NORD SECONDED THE MOTION. Chairman Glick opened the Public Hearing. Those giving testimony were asked to state their name and address for the record and sign the sheet provided on the podium. There was no Public Testimony on this issue. Kebschull commented the staff had no additional comments on this issue. VOTE: NORD YES GOECKE YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES WERNER-(}UADE YES GRAVELEY ABSENT MOTION PASSED. PZ98-54 -- A resolution of the Planning Ik Zoning Commission recommending the Kenai Municipal Code at 23.25.030 be amended to set clear standards for what constitutes a junk vehicle. MOTION: Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 12 GOECKE MOVED TO PASS THE RESOLUTION PZ98-54. WERNER-~UADE SECONDED THE MOTION. Chairman Glick opened the Public Hearing. Those giving testimony were asked to state their name and address for the record and sign the sheet provided on the podium. Verbatim Begins Gus Rhodes, 207 Birch Street, Kenai, Alaska I have read this ord.. new ordinance that you put out. It ah does very little to clarify it in the eyes of the law. I don't know where this ordinance came from but it has already been overturned by several district and appellate courts. Especially the parts that re.. put up the time limitations of 30 days for this and 30 days for that. It has been said that zoning is that which confiscates property of the poor and weak and is a nuisance to the rich and powerful. This is a case where ah it will be enforced only against those who can't defend themselves. This particular law change came up because of they., were talking about inoperative vehicles and the criminal appeals court has ruled that an inoperative vehicle is not a junk vehicle. If they are going to make it junk vehicles, then you better repeal the previous law this one cites and uh get rid of it entirely and re.. substitute the word junk for inoperative. Also, this is a land use. Not a uh.. zoning ordinance, this is not codified as required by the state law and constitution. In the zoning ordinances, and frankly I think the first time you try to force this against somebody who is willing to stand up against you it's going to be thrown out just like the last one was. Rodes: I would suggest you send it back to the attorney for a re- write. Any questions? Bryson: As. I ah.. read through it, the portions of the motion now before us in brackets are sections that are being deleted. KebschuH: That's correct Bryson: The reference to non-operating is being deleted Rodes: I don't have a copy of the law with me. Bryson' It is a proposal. Rodes: Okay Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 13 Bryson: However, your reference to a non-operating vehicle ah.. is noted in here. They're substituting the word junk for ... (Mr. Rodes is speaking over Bryson) Rodes: ...okay, okay. Well that takes care.., at the present time isn't there a junk vehicle definition in the zoning law? Bryson' In exist.., this is modifying the existing ordinance. Rodes: Yeah but this ordinance here, isn't Title 12 for zoning? KebschuH: No. Rodes' What? Title 147 And which one.. this is Title 147 Kebschull: No, Title 12. Rodes' Title 12, okay. Oh, this is Title 12 and zoning is Title 14. So therefore this is going to go under the junk vehicle in the zoning it should be moved over to the other rifle. You follow me? And then after you get done it's going to have to be sent to the City Council for their incorporation. Chairman Gltck: Yes. Rodes: Okay, any more questions? It's not fight to have a law in the books that is flawed from the beginning. And that's what this one is. And believe me, I've had some experience with junk cars. Any more questions? Chairman Glick: I guess not, thank you Mr. Rodes, appreciate your input. Is there anyone else in the public wishing to speak to this item? Seeing none I~1 bring it back to the commission. Verbatim Ends , , Kebschull commented the City Attorney would like this change because the current code does not define a junk vehicle. She further noted this is an issue this Commission deals with quite often. Chairman Glick inquired if the City Attorney felt this proposal was legally defensible. Kebschull replied yes. VOTE: BRYSON YES NORD YF~ WERNER-(~UADE YES GLICK YF~ GOECKE YES GRAVELEY ABSENT Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 14 0 MOTION PASSED. NEW BUSINESS: PZ98-56 -- Landscape/Site Plan Review -- 8080 Kenai Spur Highway. Application submitted by Deanna L. Moore, Moore's Landscaping, P.O. Box 944, Kenai, Alaska. MOTION: GOECKE MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF PZ98-56 -- LANDSCAPE/ SITE PLAN REVIEW. WERNER-(~UADE SECONDED THE MOTION. Kebschull commented the staff had nothing additional on this item. Kebschull noted that Mr. Moore was present if the Commission had questions. Bryson commented he would be abstaining from this item due to a business involvement consulting on another portion of this property. Nord commented Mr. Moore has been a client of hers in the past, but felt there was no conflict on the current item. Chairman Glick inquired of Nord if she had any business dealings involving this particular project. Nord replied she had none. Chairman Glick determined there would be no conflict of interest for Nord on this item. Discussion ensued regarding exact location of property. questions were raised for the applicant. No VOTE: WERNER-(~UADE YES BRYSON GOECKE YF~ GLICK NORD YES GRAVELEY ABSTAIN YES ABSENT MOTION PASSED. be Discussion -- Amendment to KMC 14.20.280 -- Public Hearings and Notifications Kebschull stated approximately one year ago City Council requested options on providing better public information on conditional use notification. She commented one of the methods investigated was placing signs on the property being reviewed. These signs would be disposable, approximately 24" x 30", and they would contain basic information regarding what the property Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 15 ® ® ® is being considered for and the time and location of the Public Hearing. She further noted it would be the applicant's responsibility to post the signs and remove the sign. Councilman Smalley commented this item was discussed at the last council meeting. He stated the Council and the public felt this was a good idea. Chairman Glick inquired if the Committee Members would like it to go to public hearing. Wemer-Quade and Nord responded yes. Goecke commented he was unsure and stated he preferred not to have a Public Hearing. Bryson commented he saw the merits, although questionned the purpose in lesser developed areas. He added, he was in favor of a Public Hearing. Chairman Glick determined the issue would go to Public Hearing. OLD BUSINESS: -- None CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: -- None REPORTS City Council Council_m__an Smalley reported on the recent election noting Councilmen Moore and Bookey and the' Mayor were all reseated. Smalley commented on the last City Council meetin§ notin§ Ordinance No. 1797-98 (Conditional Use Permit) passed. Smalley commented the spring budgets would include money to hire a consultant to aid in making sure the Code, Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Table are compatible. He noted, all three would be looked at simultaneously to ensure consistency. Smalley stated the project would start sometime after July 1, 1999. Councilman Smalley went over the agenda from the October 21, 1998 City Council meeting in detail. Item 2 - 5 on the first page all passed. Item 4 is basically in reference to special elections being held by mail to possibly increase voter participation. Approximately $100,000 of the Cunningham Park improvement fund is a grant with $13,000 coming from the City to cover engineering. Smalley reported on Page 2, Items 6 - 9 also passed. He reported Kelly Kelso is the new Director at the Senior Center. The potential airport development contract, Item F, will be brought back to look at during the November 12, 1998 Airport Commission meeting. Smalley noted public discussion is Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 16 be encouraged on that item, it will be considered for action at the November 18, 1998 Council meeting. Smalley discussed the Change Order (Item H3) amendment and explained it resulted in a deletion of a pay item reducing the cost to the City from $12,000 to $3,950. Proposed library fundraising strategies discussion (Item H4) was postponed until a future meeting. Borough Planning Bryson reported on the Borough Plat Committee meeting of October 26, 1998. Bryson noted all items on the consent agenda were approved as submitted. Item E 1 was postponed per staff request. Item E2, a petition to vacate, failed. Bryson further noted Items FI and F2 were approved and Item F3 was postponed. For the Item L groups, 9 existing prior use applications were submitted by Quality Asphalt Paving, all but one was approved. Administration Kebschull commented Council had requested the City Clerk look into training options for this board as well as other boards. Kebschull requested Members determine what topics they would be interested in and if one or two-day training would be better. She further noted potential times and dates would be helpful for possible scheduling. Chairman Glick commented he liked the training idea but would prefer to not train while the Commission has a vacancy. Councilman Smalley commented he felt the vacancy would be filled soon, possibly by the next meeting. Bryson commented he would have a difficult time participating during the day, evenings and Saturdays would be the best for him. Kebschull suggested the City Clerk could obtain potential dates for the Members to review. Wemer-Quade commented due to her work schedule she has asked to be transferred from the Planning and Zoning Commission. She further noted, under that circumstance, she would be unwilling to partake in a group training session. Nord commented she would have no problem attending Saturday training and suggested including other cities in the class. Kebschull stated she and the City Clerk were looking into that option. She further noted that would help with the cost. Nord noted she liked hearing the input of Members from other cities. Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 17 10. 11. 12. Goecke commented Saturday would be the best for him or possibly even during the evening. Kebschull commented since there will not be another meeting until November 25 the City Clerk may contact Members individually to get feedback and information. She further commented Council had approved the cancellation of the November 11, 1998 meeting. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: Debbie Sonberg, 410 Cinderella Street, Kenai, Alaska Ms. Sonberg spoke in favor of the notification si~s. She cited her nei§hborhood as an example where notification signs would be particularly helpful. Ms. Sonber§ commented she had brou§ht this issue up in the past and would be testifyin§ at the Public Hearin§ in favor of the signs. Chairman Glick thanked her for her input and inquired if anyone else wanted to speak. Gus Rodes, 207 Birch Street, Kenai Alaska Mr. Rodes commented he too was in favor of the public notification signs. He noted many locations Outside that followed that procedure. INFORMATION ITEMS: KPB Notice of Public Heating on Petition to Vacate -- 11/9/98 Memo from KPB Planning Department dated 10/15/98 KPB Plat Committee Action of 10/12/98 Memo dated 10/15/98 canceling November 11, 1998 Meeting COMMISSION COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS: ADJOURNMENT: GOECKE MOVED TO ADJOURN. MEETING ADJOURNED 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Alison Rapp Contract Secretary Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission October 28, 1998 Page 18 November 10, 1998 Carol L. Freas Ci~ Clerk 210 Fildago Kenai, AK 99611 Dear Ms Freas, Please accept my letter of resignation from the City of Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission effective immediately. I have accepted a position as Logistics Manager for Ventura Oil Co. (Venoco) in Santa Barbara CA. I apologize for the short notice and any hardship rny immediate departure may cause the commission but do not feel I could pass up the opportunity before me. Thank you for allowing me to serve on the commission although it was for only a short time. Sincerely, Art Graveley 1612 FATHOM DR. KENAI, AK. 99611 (907) 283-4264 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 42 original contract and the one before council some members had some concerns. That is why they were attending this meeting. Bannock stated, his comment at the last council meeting to allow the Airport Commission to have a special meeting, if needed, so that action could go forward at this meeting. He added, he was disappointed the matter couldn't move forward and that the Airport Commission wanted to review the contract again, but wouldn't be able to see it again until November. Smalley noted he had concerns about the contract included in his packet and had planned to table the contract and request it be rewritten. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: Williams' Yes Moore: Yes Smalley: Yes Bookey: Yes Swarner: Yes Measles' No Bannock: No MOTION PASSED. The item will be returned to the Airport Commission for additional review and comment. tuWilliams noted his concern there were so few people who exercised their right to vote during the October 6, 1998 election. He noted, he believed it was the lowest voter mout since his becoming mayor. BREAK TAKEN: 10:32 P.M. BACK TO ORDER: 10:50 P.M. Operations Agreement -- ARFF Management Ross noted, the agreement had been back and forth between the city and ESI for six or seven months. Every time a word is changed, the document has to be reviewed by the attorneys. Ross referred to the cover memorandum included in the packet, noting the memorandum explained financial aspects of the agreement. Most of them, council would be familiar with as they had not changed. He added, Paragraph No. 3 (regarding ESI paying the City seven percent of all ARFF gross training revenues in excess of $90,000 per year) was negotiated between the Finance Director and ESI's financial officer. Ross added, some of the maintenance items were negotiated. He reported the city had agreed to be responsible for snow removal on the roads and parking lots since there will be a tenant going in the upstairs of the building. Some of the'maintenance items on janitorial, elevator, utilities, etc. will end up in a pro- rated status. Metros. Holland also noted Airline Support, Inc. would like to be in the terminal within 45 days. Bielefeld inquired if Airline Support, Inc. had done any market research on the Kenai Airport. Holland replied they are very tight-lipped about their plans at this point. a. Summer '99 Promotional Attractions -- Assistant Mana§er Holland stated the Airport Manager would like the Commission to think of ideas for potential attractions to the Airport. Possibly a static display air show or something highlighting the float plane basin and the new gravel runway. Van Zee inquired if a work session would be upcoming. Holland stated if the Commissioners would just mull it over for now and they could get together at a later date. Chairman Thibodeau suggested Commissioners note any ideas and they could be discussed at a future meeting. ITEM 7: AIRPORT MANAGER'S REPORT a. ERA -- Lease Change -- Assistant Manager Holland reported ERA was changing their lease. ERA would be moving their offices into the former Yute Air and SouthCentral Air spaces. Holland noted the move was in progress and would be completed October 15, 1998. Revenue will increase as ERA will be leasing a larger space. b. 9~98 Enplanement Report-- Holland commented ERA seems to have the solid pie in the September 1998 Enplanement Report (included in the packet). c. Carter Proposal -- Holland discussed Mr. Carter's proposal and contract that was brought up at the City Council meeting. There was some opposition to jet noise but most of the opposition was about the wording of the contract. The Council has recommended the Airport Commission address these issues and make appropriate changes and re-present it before them. Councilman Measles commented there seemed to be the feeling the purpose of this project was to promote expansion or a new airport which is not the case. The purpose is only to take a look at potential opportunities. Holland noted it will be on the 11/12/98 agenda and if there are any changes or decisions they can be brought before the City Council at their first meeting in December. Holland informed the Commission the gravel runway opened Monday and there is traffic on it, although the signage will not be in until the middle of next month. Chairman Thibodeau inquired if there were changes to the segmented circle. Holland replied he did not think so but he would look into it. Chairman Thibodeau also inquired what the patterns were going to be when the tower AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 8, 1998 PAGE 2 was closed. Holland replied the traffic is going to continue as published: Main runway to the west; gravel runway to the east and float plane traffic to the west at 700'. JAMES E CARTER, SR., KENAI, ALASKA Mr. Carter spoke and expressed frustration with the direction and progress of the contract for the feasibility study. Mr. Carter stated he had been in regular contact with City Manager Rick Ross and complied with everything that was asked of him. Mr. Carter noted several' memos and phone conversations between himself and City Manager Ross. Mr. Carter commented on a phone conversation between himself and City Manager Ross on 7 / 16 / 98 at 10:22 a.m. Per City Manager Ross, everything was a "go" pending FAA approval. It was Mr. Carter's understanding the contract had been before the City Council on 7/1/98 and 7/15/98 and there were no problems. According to Mr. Carter, he met with the Airport Manager on 8/13/98 and received the Professional Services Agreement (Item 7). Mr. Carter stated he was very upset to receive this contract with so many amendments, specifically attachment "a", lines 7, 9, 10 and 11. Mr. Carter noted he had invested over $18,000 in time and effort into this project. Favretto inquired what document was in front of the Council on 7/15/98. Mr. Carter replied the same Professional Service Contract drawn up by himself and City Manager Ross. Carter further noted City Manager Ross took it before the City Council on 7/1 and 7/15 and there were no recommendations, additions or deletions from the council. Favretto questioned if the item was deferred or if any action was taken. Mr. Carter replied that no action was taken. Chairman Thibodeau verified which version was the final version of Carter's approved contract submitted to the City Council. Mr. Carter indicated it was the version created by himself and City Manager Ross. Assistant Manager Holland commented the new Airport Manager came on board 8/1/98 and felt the original contract needed to be revised. Holland added Manager Atha had considerable contractual expertise. Mr. Carter rebutted, the new contract was in conflict with the contract he and City Manager Ross had agreed to and further noted that City Manager Ross did not see a need to involve the airport manager. Mr. Carter continued and said under the terms of the new contract, he was no longer in position of consultant. He felt he was now an employee of Manager Atha. He added, there were too many important items changed on the contract. Favretto requested the City Council meeting minutes of 7/15/98 and the minutes from the Airport Commission meeting prior to be included in their packets for the next Airport Commission meeting. Favretto further noted, he had discussed this issue with City Manager Ross and it was clear the contract would not be approved until the new Airport Manager arrived. He stated, he was caught off guard that it was actually approved prior to that time. AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 8. 1998 PAGE $ Mr. Carter stated he could not do work under the contract as it is currently written. Assistant Manager Holland commented the Airport Commission was not included when writing the original contract and the City Council had to direct City Manager Ross and Mr. Carter to bring the issue before the Airport Manager and Airport Commission. Mr. Carter admitted this was a contract that he and City Manager Ross were working on among themselves. Chairman Thibodeau commented something this important takes time. The Airport Commission will take into consideration comments today and comments from last night's City Council meeting. Chairman Thibodeau further stated this issue will be addressed at the next Airport Commission meeting and will then be re-presented to the City Council at their first meeting in December. Holloway inquired if FAA had ever approved the contract. Mr. Carter replied they have FAA approval. Van Zee questioned Mr. Carter if the contract issues are resolved, would he still be able to perform with the same level of enthusiasm he originally had for this project. Mr. Carter responded that if he does it, he will give it 1 10%. Favretto commented, this issue is being addressed because Mr. Carter is disgruntled. Favretto further noted, he thought the obstacles could be worked [.~through and they will be able to move forward. ITEM 8: COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS [ (~~TIONS Assistant Manager Holland welcomed the new Contract Secretary, Alison Rapp. ITEM 9: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD Vesta Leigh, Box 905, Kenai, Alaska Ms. Leigh inquired if it would be possible to get the current agenda on the Intemet prior to the scheduled meeting. She stated she checked the morning of the meeting and the web site had last month's agenda. Ms. Leigh noted, more of the public will be attending commission meetings and asked if name plates for the commissioners could be acquired so the public will know who is speaking. Ms. Leigh also inquired if it would be possible to get copies of the meeting recordings. Contract Secretary Rapp referred her to City Clerk Carol Freas. ITEM 10: INFORMATION ITEMS a. Kenai City Council Meeting Action Agenda - September 2 and 16, 1998. Chairm~ Thibodeau noted the 9/2/98 document showed the $100K was appropriated for the feasibility study. AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 8, 1998 PAGE 4 10/5/98 CiTY OF KENAI DEAR S IR: 1 AM WRITING THIS LETTER TO VOICE MY O'BJECTION TO THE RECENT PROPOSAL TO TURN THE KENA[ AIRPORT INTO A JUMBO JET REFULING STOP. THE NOISE AND POLLUTION WOULD BE OFFENSIVE. TO SAY THE LEAST, I LIVE NOT MORE THAN A 1~4 MILE FROM THE RUNWAY AND HAVE FOR 24 YEARS. WHEN THE MILITARY ARE PRACTICING TOUCH AND GO 'S NOT ONLY CAN YOU SMELL THE FUEL THEY BURN AT MY LOCATION THE NOISE THAT IS PRODUCED FROM THE HEAVY PLANE IS VERY OFFENSIVE, JUST CONSIDER WHAT A 3 OR 4 ENGINE JET'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE ENVIRONMENT WOULD BE. OBVIOUSLY YOU DONT LIVE CLOSE TO THE AIRPORT AS MANY OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS DO. [ ASK YOU TO RECONSIDER YOUR DECISION REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION F. C. ROGERS 1 117 LARCH. ST. KENAI, ALASKA 99611 Carol Freas From: Sent: 1'o: Subject: Kari Mohn [kari@alaska.net] Tuesday, October 06, 1998 9:32 AM cfreas@ci.kenai.ak.us Airport Contract October 6. 1998 To: Kenai City Council From: Kari Mohn, 712 N. Strawberry Rd., Kenai, AK 99611,283-4258 I do not support the awarding of a contract to study the concept of a heavy cargo airport in Kenai. I have two objections. One, as described in the Peninsula Clarion of Tuesday, October 6, 1998, this contract would seek boroughwide support for a Kenai airport expansion, would seek support for the airport from Kenai-area representatives and the state Legislature and seek support from the Alaska delegation to Congress. A contract which seeks "support" for an expanded/new airport is not an unbiased study of the issue. Two, I am not in favor of a study for a facility that I do not want. As I walked along the Kenai beach yesterday, I was very aware that l did not want 747s flying in the vicinity to land at a Kenai based airport. The quality of the environment in our town is very important to me. I urge you to vote against the awarding of a contract to study the feasibility of a new or expanded Kenai airport. ITEM A: o , AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 199 8 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http: //www.ci.kenai.ak.us / CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call OATHS OF OFFICE -- MAYOR WILLIAMS, COUNCILMEN BOOKEY AND MOORE Agenda Approval Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk {*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B- o . SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS { 10 minutes) Bill Coghill -- Mikunda Cottre11 & Co./Audit Presentation Bob Seymour-- KCHS Hockey Booster Club ITEM C: . . e PUBLIC HEARINGS Resolution No. 98-77 -- Adopting Certain Street Name Changes Resolution No. 98-78 -- Awardin§ a Bid to Eastside Carpet Co. for Kenai Public Library Book and Shelvin§ Removal and Replacement- 1998 for the Total Amount of $17,200. Resolution No. 98-79 -- Directin§ the Continuation of the Project Entitled, "Crow Court Street Improvement District" and Designatin§ What Improvements Are to be Included in this Project. ITEM D: . COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS Council on Aging Airport Commission -1- . 4. 5. 6. 7. Harbor Commission Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board c. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board d. Alaska Municipal League Report ITEM E: . MINUTES *Regular Meeting of October 21, 1998. ITEM F: o CORRESPONDENCE *R.Ross memorandum regarding Revised Professional Services Agreement/City of Kenai and James E. Carter/Professional Consulting Services at the Kenai Municipal Airport for the Project Called Airport Expansion and Development/A User Interest Survey-- FOR INFORMATION ONLY. ITEM G: OLD BUSINESS ITEM H' o , , . e . ITEM I: o NEW BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1803-98-- Amending the Zoning Code at KMC 12.25.030 to More Clearly Define "Junk Vehicle." Discussion -- Public Opinion Survey Discussion -- Possible Purchase of Overland Avenue Property (Lot 2, Block 5/Three Lots). Discussion -- EDD/EDA -- ARFF Advertisement/Public Relations. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS Mayor City Manager -2- 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works 7. Airport Manager ITEM J: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council EXECUTIVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM K: ADJOURNMENT -3- KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 199 8 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http: //www.ci.kenai,ak.us ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at approximately 7'03 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Kenai City Hall Building. A-X. PLEDGE OF ALLF~IANCE Mayor Williams led those assembled in the Pledge of Allegiance. A-2. ROLL CALL Roll was taken by the City Clerk. Present were' Swarner (arrived at 7'19 p.m.), Moore, Bannock, Smalley (arrived at 8'1 1 p.m.), Williams and Bookey. Absent was: Measles A-3o OATHS OF OFFICE -- MAYOR WILLIAMS~ COUNCILMEN BOOKEY AND MOORE Clerk Freas administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Williams. Mayor Williams administered the Oath of Office to Councilmen Bookey and Moore. A-4o AGENDA APPROVAL Mayor Williams requested the following changes to the agenda: ADD TO: D-6, Teresa Werner-Quade Letter of Resignation from Planning & Zoning Commission/Application for placement on Harbor Commission. D-6, Planning & Zoning Commission -- Applications on file. ADD TO: H-4, Public Opinion Survey -- Library Commission suggested questions. MOTION: Councilman Bannock MOVED for approval of the amended agenda and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Williams reported he had no changes to the consent agenda. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 2 MOTION: Councilman Moore MOVED for approval of the consent agenda as presented. There were no objections. 80 ORDERED. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS B-lo Bill Coghtll -- Mikunda Cottrell & Co./Audit Presentation Coghill referred to the information he distributed and encouraged council to read his letter of transmittal which pointed out highlights of which they would be interested. Coghill noted, there was approximately $13 million in airport improvements which a lot of that was attributed to the Aircraft Fire Training Center (mostly funded by grants). He continued, the General Fund Balance was at approximately $10 million, decreased from a year ago by approximately $1 million due to the funding of the Equipment Replacement Fund. Coghill also reported an accounting change had to make changing valuing investments to market value. There was very little difference between the market value of the investments and the carrying value, which is very good. No special disclosure was necessary due to the prudent investment policies of the City. Coghill noted, last year there were two comments in their management letter dealing with the YK2000 issue and the change in accounting already mentioned. This year, the change to market value has been handled and now only the YK2000 problem remains. Coghfll added, they do note in the letter a conversion of systems is in process and a good plan going forward. Coghill also reported the single audit report has not yet been issued due to correspondence received from FAA stated they have laws that are not covered by the Single Audit Act and that require some special letters indicating the city's compliance with FAA's policies and procedures regarding use of airport revenues. Coghill continued, he contacted FAA and found that the Office of Management & Budget and don't agree with FAA requiring the separate letters. Coghill added, Mikunda Cottrell will do whatever FAA tells them to do as far as special letters or wording. They will wait until the issues are resolved before writing the letters. Coghill continued, they found no indication of problems with the city's use of airport revenues and the letters will be out before the end of the year. Williams congratulated Coghill on his company's work with the city's audit and thanked him for their work. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 3 9-2. Bob Seymour -- KCHS Hockey Booster Club It was noted Mr. Seymour was not in attendance at the meeting, however a copy of the letter requesting donation of funds for an advertisement in the KCHS Hockey Booster Club Game Program was included in council's packet. Clerk Freas noted council had placed $200 in the Legislative account for this purpose. Clerk Freas was directed to request a check in the amount of $200 be forwarded to the KCHS Hockey Booster Club. It was noted Councilwoman Swarner arrived at 7' 19 p.m. ITEM C- PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1. Resolution No. 98-77 -- Adopting Certain Street Name Changes MOTION: Councilman Bookey MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 98-77 and Councilman Moore SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. C-2. Resolution No. 98-78 -- Awarding a Bid to Eastside Carpet Co. for Kenai Public Library Book and Shelving Removal and Replacement- 1998 for the Total Amount of $17,200. MOTION' Councilman Moore MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 98-78 and Councilwoman Swarner SECONDED the motion. There were no public comments. It was noted the library would be closed on November 19 and reopened on December 7. The painting of the library will begin prior to that, but will be done at night. Patrons will be allowed to check out a three- week collection of books prior to the closure. Councilman Moore noted the Library Commission discussed the method of removing the books and asked if the company did not perform or could not perform, what recourse would the city have. City Manager Ross answered, the city would refuse payment. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 4 VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. C-3o Resolution No. 98-79 -- Directing the Continuation of the Project Entitled, "Crow Court Street Improvement District" and Designating What Improvements Are to be Included in this Project. MOTION: Councilman Bookey MOVED for approval of Resolution No. 98-79 and Councilman Bannock SECONDED the motion. There were no public comments. Councilman Bookey questioned the correspondence with the Cook Inlet Housing Authority (included in the packet) and asked if they will be exempt from paying assessments on Lot 1. Attorney Graves explained, Clerk Freas sent a letter to CIHA responding to their letter stating they were exempt from payment of assessments. In the letter, Freas noted the city considered CIHA responsible for payment of the assessments on Lot 1 of Crow Court because, according to the CIHA/City of Kenai Cooperation Agreement, without advance approval by the city, CIHA can only acquire properties which have paved streets, and city water and sewer service installed. CIHA did not request prior approval of the acquisition and therefore is responsible for payment of the assessments. Bookey stated his concern was if the matter returns and it is found CIHA does not have to pay assessments, the cost will increase to the other property owners in Crow Court. Graves stated, if CIHA refuses to pay the assessments, the city will foreclose on the property for the assessment. Public Works Manager Komelis noted curbs and gutters were included in the project because Tinker Lane already has curbs and gutters. In looking at the property and elevations, it appeared that would be the best solution to handle drainage in the area. Bannock asked if there had been any further correspondence from CIHA. reported no further correspondence had been received. Freas VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM D: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 5 D-1. Council on Aging-- Councilwoman Swarner reported there had been no recent meeting. The Senior Center newsletter was included in the packet. As a money-making project, the seniors were again selling pies for Thanksgiving. Orders could be made through the Senior Center. D-2o Airport Commission -- No report. D-3. Harbor Commission -- Councilman Bookey reported the minutes of the meeting held on November 2 would be included in the next packet. He noted, the Commission discussed the extension of the boardwalk at the fiats and asked Administration to look for funding sources and investigate how Anchorage funded the boardwalk at Potters Marsh. Williams reported he received broad support in regard to the proposed wayside park at Birch Island. He added, there is a possibility the extension of this boardwalk may be added to the Birch Island project. Williams also noted he would be meeting with a committee of representatives from the various Native organizations in the area in regard to the Birch Island project. D-4. Library Commission -- Councilman Moore reported the Commission met November 3. At the meeting, they heard a report from the Friends of the Library who are organizing a 50th Anniversary Party for the library to be held on March 7. Moore also noted, the fall book sale garnered approximately $1,500 and they estimate a profit of approximately $15,000 from ticket sales for the October 30 and 31, 1998 dinner. The Commission also discussed the patron survey and set the Holiday Open House for Sunday, December 14 from 12:00 to 4'00 p.m. Moore also reported a group from the Library Improvement Committee met with City Manager Ross. Through their discussions, it was decided the Commission should revisit their research for an addition to the library. The committee will meet again on November 16. D-5. Parks/~ Recreation Commission -- Councilman Bannock reported the Commission's November meeting would be held November 5. Parks & Recreation Director Frates reported the work that could be done on the Erik Hansen Scout Park had been completed by fall. In the spring, the gravel will need to be compacted and the remainder of the work will be completed at that time. D-6. Planning/l~ Zoning Commission -- Councilman Smalley was not present to report actions taken by the Commission. Council reviewed the letter of resignation from Teresa Wemer-Quade which was included in the packet. They had no objections to the resignation. It was also noted, Ms. Quade requested to be KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 6 transferred to the Harbor Commission. Quade to the Harbor Commission. Council had no objections to appointing Ms. Council noted, with the resignation of Ms. Quade, there were now two seats available on the Commission. They reviewed the applications on file and distributed to council at the beginning of the meeting. Williams recommended Ozzie Osbom for appointment and noted Osborn had been a member of the Commission in the past and had some experience with the work for which the Commission is responsible. Swarner suggested Barbara Waters as her application had been on file for a long time. She added, she spoke with Ms. Waters and is aware she is still interested in the appointment. Moore requested consideration of Mark Schrag to be appointed. He noted Schrag has shown interest from attending council meetings and he has telephoned him several times in regard to the possibility of appointment. Clerk Freas reported Commissioner Bryson will be out of town in December. There is some concern there would be a hardship in acquiring a quorum if appointments are not made in the near future. Council decided to wait until the November 18 meeting to make appointments. Clerk Freas was directed to contact the applicants and request they be in attendance at the meeting in order for council to talk with them about their thoughts, views and philosophies. Bannock asked if others could apply prior to the November 18 meeting. Answer was yes. D-7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees D-7a. Beautification Committee -- Swarner reported the December and January meetings had been cancelled by council at their last meeting. D-7b. Historic District Board -- Moore reported the minutes of the last meeting were included in the packet. The Board decided to meet quarterly but to meet as committees between the quarterly meetings. They will meet once more in November prior to beginning their quarterly schedule. Swarner noted the vote on the motion to meet quarterly was shown as passed with three yes and one no. She noted it takes four yes votes to pass the motion. MOTION: Swarner MOVED to direct the Historic District Board to proceed with plans to meet on a quarterly basis beginning in January. Councilman Moore SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. Swamer noted the discussion regarding the placement of the Gold Rush signage and suggested commissions, committees and boards work together -- there needs to be more coordination. Moore added, in regard to the Gold Rush sign, there were to be KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 7 ten signs placed around the state and at first Kenai was not included. The Historic District Board had expressed interest in having a sign placed at Kenai. Rolf Buzzell visited Kenai felt the most appropriate place to have a sign was at the KVCC. Although the Board felt it was not the most preferred place, but they felt it better to have the sign than not. D-7c. Kenai Visitors/l~ Convention Bureau Board -- Kathy Tarr, Executive Director of the KVCC reported: · the lights placed on the facility by Bob Frates and Terry Bookey looked very nice and thanked the city for having the lights hung; · their next board meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, November 10 at 5:30 p.m.; · their website was almost complete (www.visitkenai.com); · they have invited the Permanent Fund Corporation Board of Trustees to hold their next meeting in Kenai; the State Office of Archeology and History is providing funding for placement of historical signs throughout southeast Alaska. They have narrowed the site for the Gold Rush sign in Kenai to three sites, one being the grassy area between the KVCC and Kenai Chamber. In order to place the sign there, permission will be needed from the Chamber, however no opposition was expected; · Monica Griffin has begun employment with the KVCC taking the position left vacant by Mindy Lucas; · the KVCC is planning the second annual Peninsula Writers' Night. They will be sure to coordinate the date with the Library's 50th Anniversary celebration. D-7e. Alaska Municipal League Report -- Williams noted Councilman Smalley's seat on the AML Board of Directors will become available due to his election to the Legislature. Williams asked if council wanted to endorse a candidate to replace Smalley or wait until the issue is discussed at the AML Conference. Bookey stated his interest in the appointment. Clerk Freas was directed to write a letter of endorsement to support Councilman Bookey to the seat. BREAK TAKEN: BACK TO ORDER: 7:50 P.M. 8:06 P.M. ITEM E: MINUTES E-X. Regular Meeting of October 21, 1998. Approved by consent agenda. ITEM F: KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 8 F-Xo R.Ross memorandum regarding Revised Professional Services Agreement/City of Kenai and James E. Carter/Professional Consulting Services at the Kenai Municipal Airport for the Project Called Airport Expansion and Development/A User Interest Survey ~- FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Williams noted this item would not be discussed. The memorandum accompanied a copy of the most recent draft contract and reported the contract would be discussed at the Airport Commission on November 12 and would be returned to council for consideration at their November 18 meeting. ITEM OLD BUSINESS-- None. ITEM H: NEW BUSINESS H-Xo Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED for approval of Item H-1 and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. H-2o Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED for approval of Item H-2 and Councilman Bookey SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. H-3o Ordinance No. 1803-98-- Amending the Zoning Code at KMC 12.25.030 to More Clearly Define "Junk Vehicle." Introduced by consent agenda. H-4o Discussion -- Public Opinion Survey Bob Peters, Library Commission Chair reviewed questions the Commission developed and would like to have included in the Public Opinion Survey. Councilman Moore added, the questions were developed after a lengthy discussion. The Commission hoped to obtain information from non-library users as well as users. Peters added, the library takes a biannual survey of patrons and hoped to reach a different segment of citizens who do not use the library. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 9 It was noted Councilman Smalley arrived at 8:11 p.m. Clerk Freas reported, in the past the persons to whom the survey was sent were randomly (every tenth person possibly) taken from the voter registration list. City Manager Ross added, taking names randomly from the voter list would give a Sampling of less than 500, about ten percent of the registered voters. Moore requested the Library Commission's questions be included in the survey as submitted. Other changes requested by council included: Chan~es requested at 10 / 21 / 98 meeting: Questions 2 and 3 are redundant, change. Question 17 - Add Beautification Question 24 - include all Parks & Recreation facilities/parks individually/list ski trails and tent campground/include Senior Center. Changes requested at 11 / 4 [ 98 meeting: Question 25 - Remove (not intention of council to raise sales tax) Question 39 - Remove Longevity Bonus from the list. Question 35 - Include purchases from Intemet and TV with catalog. Question 27 - Leave in, but change Kenai Library to Kenai Community Library. Question 26 - Remove. Add questions received from Library Commission. Only change is to the last one regarding funding. Change wording of their last question more like: The Kenai Community Library Commission has determined the need for the expansion of your library to best serve you. If the community agrees, how should this be funded? Increase property tax? Increase sales tax? Bonding? Other funding? {Be specific) The questionnaire is to be brought back to council at the November 18 meeting in final form for review and final consideration. Discussion -- Possible Purchase of Overland Avenue Property (Lot 2, Block 5/Three Lots). Williams noted, Attorney Graves had corresponded with the owner of Lot 2, Block 5 in Old Town. A copy of a plat was included in the packet. Also noted, was the property on which the old power plant had been situated. Williams added, the owner of Lot 2 had no objections to the city conducting contamination tests on the lots. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 10 Williams asked if council was interested in acquiring the property and use it as a museum site, etc. or in having a contamination survey done on the property. Councilman Bookey stated he would not endorse purchasing more property in Old Town as he believed those properties needed to stay with the private sector. He noted the old Fish & Wildlife buildings would soon be transferred to the Kenai Natives Association and there may be some development of that property in the future. He added, the city didn't need to acquire more property, taking it off the tax rolls. It was noted, the assessed value of the three lots was $31,900. Moore requested the Historic District Board review the question as they may have some ideas for use of the property. Smalley stated he agreed with Bookey, but had no objection to the Board reviewing the possibility. Council directed administration to include the subject as a discussion item on the November Historic District Board's agenda. Discussion -- EDD / EDA -- ARFF Advertisement/Public Relations. Williams reported he met with three representatives of the Economic Development Administration in Kenai. Their primary purpose for visiting the area was to do a review of the Kenai Visitors & Cultural Center. They discussed jobs created from the Center being built. The survey was brought about due to a 1997 federal law mandating review of facilities developed from federal funds to fred out if the taxpayers are getting full value from the funds used. While here, Wilhams added, he took the representatives to the Alaska Regional Aircraft Fire Training Center for a tour and to question whether funds might be available for construction of a hose tower and office building at the facility. They did not encourage the possibility of funding because a direct correlation of jobs from the amount of funds granted had to be shown. Students attending the facility who were there to improve their skills could not be counted. However, students there for initial training could be counted. Williams added, grants never exceed $1 million and are generally matching grants. If the city requested a 70/30 grant, it would mean the city would have to finance $180,000 of the costs. Whether or not airport funds could be used for such a project is questionable because FAA already denied the warehouse as a part of the ARFF project because it didn't constitute a need by aircraft crash trucks (the warehouse would be mostly used for overall industrial support, crash pond, tower repelling, etc.). Williams reported, he also discussed the possibility of developing a Cold Water Recovery School at the ARFF complex. A committee has been developed to consider the possibilities. He added, he felt an attempt should be made to work on both sides, KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 11 i.e. through EDD to enter into a pre-application for $600,000 and at the same time, continue to develop amounts needed to develop the cold water recovery school, including an additional $600,000 for a warehouse through Senator Stevens' office as an appropriation request. Those funds would be then funneled through the EDA as was done with the Challenger Center funding. Council would still have the option of turning either down. Williams noted, the committee was scheduled to meet on November 23 and his recommendation was not to do anything until after that meeting. Bookey stated there may be other avenues to think about in regard to funding from airport and wanted to talk to administration about that in the future. Ross stated he met with Williams and the EDA representatives twice. The audit of the grant was discussed during his second meeting. There .would be complications to work through if it was decided to go forward with Williams' suggested projects. He added, using airport funds would be difficult because the land on which a warehouse/cold water recovery school would be built is General Fund land. Unless the projects are ARFF-related, they would not be able to do a lease-back program. He added, options are limited because it is not Airport Land. Ross added, the audit was an eye-opener in that the rules have changed substantially since the building of the KVCC. Now, the rules are directed at direct employment garnered from the project. The survey used in the past would not be acceptable today. Ross continued, he also discussed with the EDA representatives the cold water recovery project; the second phase of the multi-purpose facility (which would fail because of the direct job requirements); water and sewer extensions across Bridge Access Road (there is a potential there); and the possibility of partnering with the Kenai Natives Association in regard to the old Fish & Wildlife site. In regard to the warehouse project, Ross added, a commitment would be needed from a user and what kind of a lease would be used to show it is a business deal. If ESI were the contractor, the city would have a way to recover the costs. Williams added, he believed if a direct grant were made for the purpose of building the warehouse (directly to the city), all three facilities could use the building. The question would be whether or not there would be a charge for use of building space. Williams added, he believed the development of a warehouse would be a reality in the near future as there is a lot of need. Williams requested administration meet with the committee on November 23 to see what kind of plan could be developed. In regard to advertising and public relations for the city/ARFF, Williams referred to information developed by the Economic Development District. Williams noted, funding was included in the Legislative budget for brochures and redoing the city video. Information received from EDD regarding a new brochure for the City of KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 12 Homer estimated costs to be $10,000 for 1,500 brochures and $12,000 for 3,000 brochures. The possibility of using a CD-rom as the medium for a brochure was discussed briefly. Administration was directed to gather price information in regard to updating the video and/or placing the information on CD-rom for distribution. ITEM I: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS I-1. Mayor a. Water/Sewer Charges -- Williams reported he received a telephone call from Charles Woodcock who lives on Aliak. Woodcock was upset that he was receiving a water/sewer billing even though he had a plumber winterize his home on Aliak and he closed his home for the winter (Woodcock was living Outside for the winter). Williams added, he told Woodcock he would ask council if they would consider a policy that if a letter was received from a plumber confirming a home had been winterized, etc. (and perhaps one when the water was turned back on in the spring), billings could be stopped during the months the house would not be using water/sewer services. Ross explained, this is an issue discussed in the past. Some jurisdictions (in other states) have summer rates, however, in most of those cases, the municipality is not the producer, as is the City of Kenai. Ross continued, the city has a fixed cost for the water/sewer services to its public. If a separate rate is offered to "snowbirds" or owners of homes that are up for sale and sitting empty, the costs to the city's other consumers would be increased. Swarner stated she would want the rates left as they are. Smalley agreed and added, the consumer is paying for the service, not the value. Bookey stated he felt the same and asked Graves what the finding was with the recent lawsuit in which one city was involved regarding water/sewer regulations. Graves answered, the city's regulations were upheld and found to be proper and appropriate. b. Hal Smalley Impending Departure to the Legislature -- Council discussed the upcoming departure of Smalley from council as he was recently elected to represent District 9 in the Alaska Legislature. Smalley stated he would be sworn in on ,January 19, however he would be leaving for ,Juneau prior to that time. Williams noted, the Kenai Charter states the council shall appoint someone to the seat left open and that person would serve until the next general election at which time the seat would be elected to the end of the term. He noted, the Charter did not give guidelines as to how or when the person is to be chosen. Williams added, he KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 13 believed council should begin hearing from people in the community interested in be appointed to the seat in February or perhaps wait until the next general election and have the voters decide who should be in the position. Swarner stated she believed council should appoint someone in late January or early February in order to have a full council. She added, she would like letter of application or resumes from interested citizens to be collected by the City Clerk. Swarner added, she has already received questions from interested citizens as to what will be done as they are interested in the position. Smalley suggested the public process begin by early January. Moore agreed and added, he believed it important the appointee be involved with the budget process. Williams suggested administration be directed to advertise and collect resumes beginning December 1, council could review them in early January and make an appointment in February. Bannock asked if a candidate would be required to submit a Conflict of Interest form prior to being appointed. Attorney Graves was requested to get an opinion from the Alaska Public Offices Commission in this regard. Council requested advertising for letters of interest, resumes, applications begin around December 1; they will begin interviewing candidates in January; and will appoint someone in early February. I-2. City Manager a. Five-Irons Subdivision Land Sale -- Ross reported the land sale had taken place with bids opened on November 3. He added, there were 13 bids received on seven of the lots. If all bidders perform in addition to the one submitted after the bid at minimum {on a lot not receiving a bid) there would be five lots available. Approximately $290,000 was raised from the sale of the eight lots now sold. Ross added, he intended to hold the price at the minimum amount and go out for another bid in the spring if lots are still available. Moore asked how much longer could a person be able to come in an negotiate the purchase of a lot at the minimum bid. Ross answered any time. Ross added, if only one or two lots are left, he would not want to hold another sale because of the costs involved. He added, he believed those lots would be taken as other lots are developed. I-3. Attorney -- Attorney Graves reported he would be attending the attorneys meeting at AML and would be out of the office Thursday and Friday. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 14 1-4. City Clerk Freas reminded council Student Government Day would be held at their November 18 meeting. Freas read into the record the following telephone polls- 10/29/98 The Public Works STP is requestin§ Council approval for a purchase order to HACH Company for the purchase of an autoclave and water bath. The autoclave machine sterilizes the instruments used to run required twice-weekly fecal coliform tests for the City's NPDES EPA Permit. The existing machine is blowing fuses, and the main heater and pressure switch are not working. There are no parts available to fuc the machine as it is too old. HACH has one machine in , , stock, and they will hold it. for two days. If we order the machine today, the City should be able to have the new machine in operation by Monday in order to complete the weekly tests. The water bath was a budgeted item and is also needed for the NPDES Permit tests. Autoclave Machine $3,495 Water bath 1,855 Shipping 94 $5,444 Authorized by Rick Ross, City Manager Signed by L.A. Semmens, Finance Department Attested by Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Vote: John Williams: Ray Measles: James C. Bookey, III: Hal Smalley: Linda Swarner: Duane Bannock: Joe Moore: Unable to contact Yes Yes Yes Yes (Comment: Should have been on last purchase order list.) Yes Yes Poll taken by Carol L. Freas, City Clerk. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 15 10 / 30 / 98 Telephone Poll: The Public Works Shop is requesting Council approval for a purchase order to Oshkosh Truck Corp. for the purchase of a 250-amp alternator for the Fire Department's ladder truck. The truck is out of operation and ISO compliance. The cost is $2,499 with an estimated $200 for shipping. The Shop will have the old alternator rebuilt, and it can be used as a back up for three vehicles. Authorized by Rick Ross, City Manager Signed by Robin G. Feltman, Finance Department Attested by Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Vote: John Williams' Ray .Measles: James C. Bookey, III: Hal Smalley: Linda Swarner: Duane Bannock: Joe Moore: Unable to reach Yes (can't have truck out of service) Unable to reach Yes (no problem) Yes (did not like the poll -- asked how long it had been a problem) Yes (questioned how long it had been a problem) Unable to reach Poll taken by Janice E. Taylor Finance Director-- No report. Public Works-- No report. 1-7. Airport Manager -- Airport Manager Atha reported ERA Airlines moved into the old SouthCentral counterspace. He also reported he would be interviewing for an office assistant in the near future. Atha also reported he would be holding tenant/manager meetings on a regular basis which will help in getting inside information on development of businesses and pursuing new outside possibilities. Williams stated he had received comments that ERA's service to the city was deteriorating. He added, he commented to those people that the city is aware changes can cause these things to occur, but that the city is investigating the possibility of another carrier stationing itself in Kenai. He noted, the price of tickets if up and it is hard to get a seat on the planes. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 16 ITEM J: DISCUSSION J-1. Citizens a. Jill Lipka, 1606 Salmo Circle, Kenai -- Lipka asked who the city is hopin§ to tar§et in re§ard to the use of video tapes or CD-roms. Williams answered, in the past the videos had been sent to businesses as they were developed to tar§et economic development. However, brochures had been sent to businesses and used as relocation information. Lipka suggested using CD-roms would duplicate efforts and suggested an intemet site development would be another option. (People who have the ability to use CD- roms have computers and most have intemet capabilities.) She added, not everyone has a computer, but most people have VCR's. She suggested the video refer to the website as well. b. Kevin Remson -- Remson suggested the public opinion survey would miss a good portion of users of the library with the distribution plan discussed earlier and suggested using the schools for input. Williams answered, taking it to the schools would skew the results. Ross added, the library does a user survey as well. The public opinion survey is meant to be a random survey of the community, not necessarily targeted to library users which would skew the results. J-2. Council a. Bookey -- Bookey noted the election of the Vice Mayor was omitted from the beginning of the meeting. MOTION: Councilman Bookey MOVED to elect Raymond Measles as Vice Mayor and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. Bookey also stated he appreciate the lights being placed in town. He asked if lights would be placed in front of Carrs Mall. Frates reported the lights were placed there but the transformer blew out. As soon as the transformer is repaired the lights will be on. Swarner -- Reported there would be a retirement party for Pat Porter at the Senior Center on November 23 beginning at 6'00 p.m. Moore -- Moore asked if the regular voter list would be used for the public opinion survey. He suggested the water/sewer user list. Ross noted, that would omit people living in the VIP Subdivision and other areas of town not receiving KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1998 PAGE 17 water/sewer services. Williams suggested the list be sorted as it is not accurate at this time due to the lack of purging by the state. He suggested those receiving the survey be people who have voted in the last three elections. Bannock -- Reported he would not be in attendance at the November 18 council meeting. Smalley -- Reported the Planning & Zoning Commission was down to five members and if there is a conflict by one of the members, it may be difficult to take care of business. Smalley asked how soon appointments would be made. Williams noted, earlier discussion found that applications would be reviewed at the November 18 meeting. Swarner suggested time be set aside at the beginning of the meeting so applicants would not have to wait through the whole meeting. Bannock suggested a work session be held instead in order to talk/interview the applicants. Council determined to hold a work session at the Senior Center on November 25, beginning at 7'00 p.m. to review applications and talk w/th candidates. Smalley apologized for being late to the meeting. He noted, he was in Anchorage attending a Legislative organizational meeting where they worked on committee assignments. He added, he was excited about his new position and looking forward to the work. Williams congratulated Smalley on his election to the Legislature. He added, he was looking forward to Smalley serving the community and knew he would do a fine job. Parks & Recreation Director Frates reported he spoke with representatives of the Pop Warner organization about their placement of signs on the FAA ball field. He noted, the placing of the signs came from a decision of their board who thought since they were using the area, they could place the signs. Frates noted, the signs were removed. EXECUTIVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM K: ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:29 p.m. Minutes transcribed and prepared by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk ] mes £. ( arter, ,qr. Post Office Box 212 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Telephone (907) 283-9272 November '10, '1998 Honorable John J. Williams, Mayor City of Kenai 710 Fidalgo Street Kenai, Alaska 99611 Dear Mayor Williams: it is not with bitterness but with great disappointment in working with the City Administration that I decline the contract to assist the City with its expanded airport fact finding project. It is disturbing to note that it was in April of this year when i first made the airport presentation to the City Council and where you gave your permission to proceed, and it is now November and we are no closer in finalizing a contract than we were when the first, and, in my opinion, the best contract was presented to the City Council in July. On August 1st, the new Airport Manager arrived and shortly after that he determined that the contract, the one before the City Council in July, was not acceptable and with the City ,~4anager's approval: he put forth yet another contract. That contract, ] must tell you, was a complete disaster ~nd because of it, damage control has been ~n effect for the past three months. Intentional or not, this delay, has also created the recent public outcry. All of this has occurred after the City Manager assured me and the Airport Commission at the June 11th meeting -- 'once hired, the Airport Manager will concentrate his efforts on developing the existing airport and not be involved in the research presented by Carter'. Even in the most recent revision of the Contract everything is done through, for, and by the Airport Manager. Ironically, there is nothing in the record that says the City Council objected to the first contract that was presented on July 1st and again on July 1Sth. It is a pro-development contract and senses cooperation, trust, integrity and teamwork and requires reports and communications between the right parties. Doesn't need to be complicated. Honorable John J. Williams, ,~layor City of Kenai November 10, 1998 - Page 2 Kenai didn't get to be an ',All American City' in 1992 by not having people in the right place, doing the right thing, at the right time, nor will Kenai as a 'Village with a Past and a City with a Future' live up to that motto without a pro-active, pro-development stance. ! feel the expanded airport fact finding project is viable and of major importance in the long-range economic development for the City of Kenai and the Kenai Peninsula Borough as a whole. ! urge the City to go forth with this project and offer my support an(] best wishes in your endeavors. God speed to you all- , CC: iVlember$, Kenai City Council Members, Kenai Airport Commission Richard Ross, City Manager Steve Atha, Airport Manager CITY OF KENA! 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ 1992 M emoranClum Date' To: From: November 13, 1998 Mayor and Council Richard A. Ross, City Manager ~ Airport Expansion and Development- Airport User Interest Survey In recent press accounts there has been concern raised that the airport project has been fast-tracked without adequate opportunity for public input. There has also been criticism on how slow the process has been. The attached timeline is provided so you can make your own assessment. The issue that interrupted the process the longest was whether FAA would authorize expenditure of airport funds. The Airport Manager resolved this after his arrival in August. Criticism directed at the Airport Manager for the language in the contract in your packet has been misdirected. Any criticism should be directed to me as the Airport Manager was carrying out my instructions. If you compare the Scope of Services in the contract with my comments on proposed Phasing of Work in the dune 3rd Council meeting minutes; my comments of the dune 1 lth Airport Commission; and comments at subsequent meetings; I believe you will find them consistent. Mr. Carter's withdrawal from consideration for this project is regretted. I have appreciated his insights based on his aviation background, and do concur that there is potential for a worthwhile project. Memorandum to Council November 13, 1998 Page 2 of 2 Undertaking a study of the first three elements in the Scope of ~ervices could provide valuable information and insights as to potential future opportunities. It could also provide information that would validate the 20-year Airport Master Plan, or lead to its modification. The contract before you could serve as the basis for preparation of an RFP. The scope of services requested would be limited to the survey of the industry as to future aviation growth expectations in Alaska, an analysis of how the requested growth is being planned for, and an assessment of what opportunities may be available to the City of Kenai. This is outlined in items 1 through 4 in the Scope of Services attached to the contract before you. Once this information was available, Council would be in a position to determine what economic realities are for future airport development. the decision to proceed entails potential for future expansion or relocation of present facilities, then funding could be sought for costs associated with site analysis, environmental and community impact studies. If Attachments RAR/kh AIRPORT CONTRACT TIMELINE June 3rd City Council- Administration advised how it would proceed and phasing of work- unless objected to- no objections. (Compare Scope of Service contract before you with June 3rd minutes.) Referred to the Airport Commission. 1 1th Airport Commission- Received comments and testimony. 17m City Council- Reported back to Council with comments of Airport Commission. Advised Council of discussions with FAA- funding issues related to proposed contract. July FAA- Exchanged letters and calls answering FAA questions on appropriateness of airport funds for contract. Aul~ust FAA- The new Airport Manager came on the job, dealt with FAA, and resolved funding issues. FAA - After review, contract. requested DBE language be added to any final September 2nd City Council- Ordinance appropriating funds on consent agenda. 16m City Council- Ordinance appropriating funds approved. Approval of contract with Mr. Carter postponed at Carter's request per Mayor- Mr. Carter ill. Copies of contract sent to all Airport Commission members in event they wanted to schedule a special meeting prior to October 7th Council meeting. October 7th Council meeting- Contract approval on agenda- public testimony reflected misunderstanding on scope of work, order of work, etc. Airport Commission Chair, With concurrence of Mr. Carter, requested contract be referred back to Airport Commission meeting on November 12th. 9th Administration met with Airport Commission Chair and Mr. Carter - reviewed contract language. 26th Contract with rewritten scope of work faxed to Mr. Carter November 4th City Council meeting- Contract with rewritten scope of work provided to Council as information item. 12th Airport Commission meeting- Referral from October 7th Council meeting. CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ M emoranclum Date: To' From: September 11, 1998 Mayor and Council Richard a. Ross, City Manager ~ James Carter Professional Services Contract Attached is a copy of the contract we propose offering to Mr. James Carter for performance of professional consulting services. As you are aware, this process has not been typical of development of professional service contracts. Normally, the Council and Administration have developed criteria for the services expected or work to be performed. Subsequent to that, an RFP is developed and put out for response to prospective providers, or negotiations are entered into with a prospective professional services provider. In this case, Mr. Carter came to the City with a vision and proposal to provide services in pursuit of that vision. The Airport Commission endorsed and the City Council directed that the Administration enter into negotiations with Mr. Carter for a contract to implement his proposal. The City recognizes the time and effort Mr. Carter has put into his proposals and the refinements and modifications of them. This has gone from a proposal to develop the present airport facilities into a heavy jet cargo airport, to a realization that relocation of the present airport to fit the future needs and growth of the City is the probable long-range goal. He has worked hard on these issues. In the formation of the proposed contract, Mr. Carter's proposals were considered and formatted to fit our professional services contract. The contract broadly describes a wide range of activities for which professional services are requested. Because of the nature of the services requested, it is very difficult to give specific definition to the work product. The proposed contract does provide for structured reporting and goal setting on a quarterly basis. By this means, the City Council and Administration can review and evaluate product and progress. The contract deviates from standard policies of the City in that Mr. Carter has requested that payment be made 15 days following receipt and approval by the City of the monthly invoice. City policy is normally 30 days. The Finance Director has agreed to work with this request and 15 days is in the contract. Mr. Carter has requested that the City include a 60-day termination notice clause in the contract. ~Ve have not done this. Ten days is the standard used in the past for professional contracts. This includes contracts for City Management services, lobbyist services, Health Center consultant contracts, etc. It is our position that once the City determines to cancel a professional services contract, ten days is adequate notice. This issue is solely at the discretion of Council if they want to extend this notice period based on circumstances specific to this contract. Attachment RAR/kh PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA and JAMES E. CARTER, SR. for PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES AT THE KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FOR THE PROJECT CALLED AIRPORT EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT--A USER INTEREST SURVEY THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of September, 1998, by and between the CITY OF KENAI, Alaska ("City") and JAMES E. CARTER, SR. ("Consultant"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining professional services to provide professional consulting at the Kenai Municipal Airport for the project called Airport Expansion and Development--A User Interest Survey ("Project"), and the Consultant is willing to perform such services within the time limits hereinafter specified; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual covenants agreements herein set forth, the City and the Consultant do mutually agree as follows' and I. RETAINER City does hereby retain the Consultant to perform the professional services herein specified, and the Consultant does hereby agree to perform said professional services within the time limits and as herein specified. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultam shall 'fully and completely perform the services described in this Agreement and in Attachment A. No changes in the Work Program or amendments to the Agreement shall be made without prior written approval of the City. Upon conclusion of the Project, all plans and documents prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the City. III. TERM The term of the Agreement shall be one (1) year from the date of signing. AGREEM~- Page 1 of 6 CON~T~ CITY IV. TIME OF PERFORMANCE Consultant shall commence work within thirty (30) days following approval of this Agreement and City authorization to proceed. Every ninety (90) days, Consultant will provide a project status report to the Airport Manager. At that time, Consultant will submit his proposed goals as well as a projected budget for the next ninety (90) days to accomplish those goals. The Consultant shall not proceed from one ninety- day (90) phase to another until he has received written direction to do so. Travel outside the Kenai/Anchorage area, if not specifically approved in the projected budget, must be approved by the Airport Manager in advance. V® RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY City shall cooperate with Consultant on all phases of the work covered by this Agreement. The Consultant will receive the general goals and direction the City proposes for development of the Kenai Mumcipal Airport through the Airport Manager. VI. COMPENSATION City shall pay Consultam not more than ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000) to provide said professional services for the Project. The amount includes all out-of-pocket expenses, including but not limited to document preparation, airlim. travel, car rental, lodging, meals, telephone, copying and delivery. Consultant agrees to properly complete the project in its entirety with a cost to the City not to exceed $100,000. Consultant shall bill for services at an hourly rate of EIGHTY DOLLARS ($80.00) inclusive of administrative assistance. Each monthly billing from the consultant will be accompanied with an itemized list of expenditures. Monthly billings are subject to review and approval by the Airport Manager and Finance Director. VII. METHOD OF PAYMENT Consultant shall be paid monthly no later than fifteen (15) days following receipt and approval by City of Consultant's monthly invoice. Consultant's monthly payment shall be a sum calculated on the basis of work completed during each month. AGREEMENT - Page 2 of 6 CONSI~TANT CITY IX. X® TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT The parties may terminate this Agreement at any time by mutual agreement in writing. City may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten days before the effective date of termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement with cause by giving written notice to City of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten (10) days before the effective date of termination. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by the Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become its property; and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant is an independent contractor, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making such contractor an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing such Contractor to create or assume any obligation or liability for or on behalf of City. Further, Consultant assumes all rights, obligations and liabilities applicable to it, as such independent contractor, hereunder. INSURANCE The Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect him and the City as a named additional insured from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage. The Consultant shall also secure and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance. The minimum limits of coverage shall be: (A) Alaska Worker's Compensation, and (B) Employer's Liability Insurance (A) Statutory (B) $500,000 per occurrence Comprehensive General Liability and Auto Liability with included Operations, Contractual Liability, and Owned, Hired, and Non-owned Vehicles $500,000 Combined Single Limit The Consultant shall secure certificate of insurance which shall be filed with this Agreement as an attachment and this certificate shall provide for not less than thirty AGREEMENT- Page 3 of 6 CON~T~ CITY days (30) written notice to the City of cancellation or substantial change in polic? conditions or coverage. XI. COMMUNICATIONS Any communications between City and Consultant provided for herein shall be given in writing and by personal delivery or by prepaid first-class registered or certified mail addressed as follows: Steve Atha, Airport Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611-7794 James E. Carter. Sr. Consultant Kenai, AK 99611 XII. RELEASE OF PROJECT MATERIALS Consultant shall not permit the publication, release or other distribution of reports, data, information, conclusions or other Project materials without prior written approval of the City, unless already publicly available. XIII. COPYRIGHT No repons, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under thL Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant. XIV. IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS All reports, maps, and other documents completed as part of this Agreement, other than documents exclusively for internal use by the City, shall carry the applicable notation on the front cover or on a title page (or, in the case of maps, in the same block) containing the name of the City, the month and year the document was prepared, who prepared the document, and Kenai Municipal Airport. XV. OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS A. Compliance o Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Consultant agrees to promote the expansion of the Kenai Municipal Airport consistent with the goals and direction received from the Airport Manager. AGREEMENT- Page 4 of 6 CONSULTANT CITY o City and the FAA, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant which are directly pertinent to the Project for the purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. City requires Consultant to maintain all required records for three (3) years after City makes f'mal payment and all other pending matters are closed. o Sanctions for Noncompliance' In the event of Consultant's noncompliance with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall impose such contract sanctions as it may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: ae Withholding of payments to Consultant under the Agreement until Consultant complies; and/or Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract in whole or in part. Be Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Assurances- o Policy: It is the policy of the City and the DOT that disadvantaged business enterprises as def'med in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with the Federal funds under this Agreement. Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this Agreement. . DBE Obligation' Consultant agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this Agreement. In this regard, all subcontractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to complete for and perform contracts. Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis or race, color, national origin, age, handicap, sex, or religion in the award and performance of DOT assisted contracts. C. Lobbying If registering with the Alaska Public Offices Commission is required, Consultant shall register properly and make all necessary reports in a timely manner to the proper authorities. XVI. INTEGRATION This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect AGREEMENT- Page 5 of 6 CONSULT~ CITY with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by the City Manager and Consultant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized represematives on the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF KENAI James E. Carter, Sr. Richard A. Ross, City Manager Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: (typed name) (typed name) Approved by City Attorney Approved by Finance AGREEMENT- Page 6 of 6 CONSULTANT CITY SCOPE OF SERVICES for Consultam will be responsible for, but not limited to, the following' . , o Render advice, representation, and assistance to the Airport Manager development opportunities of an expanded Kenai Municipal Airport. regarding Provide consultation with individuals, the air carrier industry, and government sources concerning the development opportunities at the Kenai Municipal Airport. Recommend strategies to perform the objectives of the contract. . Meet with Airport Manager quarterly to discuss and set out goals and authorized activities for the upcoming 90-day time period. Participate in meetings with the Airport Manager and the Airport Commission as needed. o Provide written reports to the Airport Manager, the Airport Commission, and the Kenai City Council as outlined in the Agreement. o Seek Kenai Peninsula Borough-wide support for the Kenai Municipal Airport expansion. , Participate in briefings and seek support for the Kenai Municipal Airport from the Kenai area representatives to the Alaska State Legislature. , Participate in briefings and seek support from the Alaska delegation to Congress or their appropriate aides handling airports and transportation matters. , Visit air carriers (both domestic and international) that may have an interest in 'the expansion of the Kenai Municipal Airport. 10. Arrange meetings between air carrier executives and our congressional delegation to promote the expanded use of the Kenai Municipal Airport. 11. Provide briefings to the Governor's appropriate staff regarding Kenai' seek their assistance with the Project. s objectives, and SCOPE OF SERVICES- Page ! of 1 Attachment "A" MEMORANDUM 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ 1992 TO: FROM' DATE: RE' Airport Commission Steve Atha, Airport Manager Carol L. Freas,/~i,ty Clerk City of Kenai ~ // November 5, 1998 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- James E. Carter, Sr. Enclosed for your information is the following information- o 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Professional Services Contract as originally submitted. 6 / 3 / 98 Kenai City Council Meeting Minutes, pages 14-15. 6 / 11 / 98 Kenai Airport Commission Meeting Minutes, pages 1-6. 6 / 17 / 98 Kenai City Council Meeting Minutes, pages 13-16. 9 / 10 / 98 Kenai Airport Commission Meeting Minutes, pages 2-3. 9 / 16 / 98 Kenai City Council Meeting Minutes, pages 2-5. 10/7/98 Kenai City Council Meeting Minutes, pages 14-42. 10 / 8 / 98 Kenai Airport Commission Meeting Minutes, pages 2-4. 10/5/98 F.C. Roger letter objecting to "proposal to turn the Kenai Airport into a jumbo jet refuling {sic) stop." 10 / 6 / 98 Kari Mohn letter objecting to awarding a "contract to study the concept of a heavy cargo airport in Kenai." 10/7/98 Joyce Ross letter objecting to "airport expansion as a 747 gas station..." PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT The City of Kenai herewith formulates a Contract with James E. Carter, Sr., Consultant, to provide professional services to gain user interest in the future expansion and further development of the Kenai Municipal Airport. It is agreed between the parties that this Contract is solely for the purpose of attracting on a global basis potential cargo and passenger heavy aircraft, air carrier industry to use the Kenai Municipal Airport if and when the airport can accommodate that industry. Parties agree there are no limits placed on the consultant as to where he may go or who he may see to accomplish this objective. It is understood between the parties that the complexity involved coordinating with different commercial and governmental entities to bring this Contract to a fruitful and positive conclusion requires an objective timeline for best results. Therefore, the parties further agree that this Contract shall be effective on a year-to-year basis with a ninety (90) day notification of termination being provided to the consultant. Consistent with the above, [he parties agree to the following: a ) At the end of each six month period, the Kenai City Manager and the Consultant will review, assess, re-assess, direct, re-direct the actions and progress of the Contract; b ) The Consultant will provide the Kenai City Manager with quarterly written reports noting accomplishments. If registering with the Alaska Public Offices Commission is rquired, Consultant shall register properly and make all necessary reports in a timely manner to the proper authorities providing a copy of same to the Kenai City Manager. Protess~onai Services Contract City of Kena,/James £. Carter, Sr. Page 1-wo This Contract embodies the entire agreement of the parties. There are no promises, [erms, conditions or obligations other than those contained herein. this Contract snail only De amencied, modifieel or changecl by a formal contract amendment executed by the Kenai City f4anager and the Consultant. Consultant is performincj the services and duties required hereunder as an independent contractor and not as an employee, agent, partner of, or joint venture with the City of Kenai. Attacl~ment 'A' and 'B' are a part of this Contract. DATED this ....... day of , 1998. Richard Ross, City Manager City of Kenai James E. Carter, Sr. Consultant ATTACHMENT "A' The Consultant will be responsible for, but not limited to, ~he following: 1. Rencier advice, representation, and assistance regarding development opportunities of the Kenai Municipal Airport. 2. Provide consultation and communications with individuals, air carrier industry, government sources, about the development opportunities at the Kenai Municipal Airport. 3. Recommend strategies to perform the objectives of the contract. 4. Hold meetings with the Kenai City Manager as outlined in the Contract. $. Provide written reports to the Kenai City Manager as outlined in the Contract. 6. Seek Kenai Peninsula Borough-wide support of the Kenai Municipal Airport project. ?. Provide briefings and seek support for the Kenai Municipal Airport project from the Kenai area representatives to the Alaska State Legislature. 8. Provide briefings and seek support from the Alaska Delegation to Congress or their appropriate aide handling airports and transportation matters. 9. Meet with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) representatives on their involvement in safety and Alaska operations. 10. Meet with U. S. State Oepartment officials to review Bi-lateral agreements to determine what restrictions there are on the use of Alaska airports other than Anchorage and Fairbanks. 1 1. Visit at least twelve (1;~) air carriers, both domestic and international, that may have an. interest in the expansion of the Kenai Municipal Airport. 1 ?. Arrange select meetings of air carrier executives with our Congressional Delegation to promote the expansion and use of the Kenai Municipal Airport. 1 3. Brief the Governor's appropriate staff as to what our objectives are and seek their assistance with the project. 1 4. Continuous follow-up on all the above tasks plus the addition of other tasks as appropriate. ATTACHMENT 'B' The City of Kenai shall subscribe [o James E. Carter, Sr., the sum ot one hundred thousand dollars ($~00,000) per year for performance of this Contract. Disbursements of funds to the Consultant shall be one-third of the total at the signing of the Contract. The remaining sum of the Contract shall be distributed in equal monthly payments commencing thirty (30) days after signing of the Contract. The same disbursement procectures shall apply for each year this Contract is in effect. All costs for the performance of this Contract is inclusive in the sul~scribed amount. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 3, 1998 PAGE 14 recreational facility. The process is on track to have the property transferred to the city and Navarre is in full support of the project. Ross added, staff believed Blocks 1 and 2 of Five Iron Subdivision will be available for sale in late July or August. He has asked that a comm/ttee be formed to review the original design of the building as well as several ideas between the users and council as to the design and construction time table for the facility. He would like the committee to include a member of the Parks & Recreation Comm/ssion, administrative staff, users and a council member. The ideas to discuss are whether the facility should be designed and built in one package with no plan for expansion or refrigeration {if this plan is chosen, it would be doubtful that the facility could be used a couple months this season}, or design/engineering in phases, planning for future expansion and refrigeration and going to construction next year. Ross added, at this time Nikiski is trying to resolve how to retrofit their ice facility. His personal opinion is that this issue needs to be resolved as the facility will be projected into the future to accept refrigeration and that it would be shortsighted to build the facility this year and then have to retrofit something not originally engineered. Airport ~Development Proposal- Ross referred to his memorandum included in the packet regarding the Airport Development Proposal scope of work. He reported he had received a call from John Sanders of Aries {Airport Master Plan contract) who asked if this work could be added to their present contract. He told them no and that the city was reviewing the possibility of negotiating a professional services contract. Ross added, he and Jim Carter will be reviewing the matter with the Airport Commission and will report back as to their comments. Ross' points were' . 0 e Get a feeling for what the cargo carriers future plans are and how they see the city fitting into them. What commitments will they give in writing and what level of support will they give to the project. Upon review of those answers, the council can make a decision to either continue or not. Then identify masses of land that would be suitable for this project and the ownership of that property. After council reviews this information, a decision can be made to continue or not. If these items come into play, further contracting can be conducted that is more general, i.e. facilitation of a public meeting where carriers are present, information is available, strategies, expertise needed, sites and public opinion gathered. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 3, 1998 PAGE 15 Ross added, this is the direction he plans on taldng unless council objects. There were no objections stated. Jim Carter - Carter stated he didn't believe there was anything he and Ross couldn't work out in regard to the proposal. He added, he is aware the scope of work is narrow, but he feels there are some items that can be incorporated into it such as having the support of other borough' communities and chambers of commerce. The support will be meaningful to the carriers and congressional delegation. Williams noted, Carter and Ross will work out details and will discuss the matter with the Airport Commission on June 11. The contract will be brought back to council for review and approval. Williams referred back to the multi-purpose recreational facilitT and noted he discussed the state of the City during his presentation, at the Kenai Chamber of Commerce luncheon. In his presentation, he outlined the value of the city, its assets and the level of debt. Williams suggested the building committee review placing a bond question on the ballot for the building of the multi-use facility. He added, the question should be designed to ask if the citizens would be willing to join, by way of debt, an already agreed-to amount to come from other sources. He asked this be investigated with the thought of placing the question on the October, 1998 ballot. Bookey asked what amount would be included in the bond. Wi!l/ams suggested $2.5 million (with refrigeration), adding approximately $450,000 to $500,000 earned from the sale of the Five Irons property. Ross stated, if the question is on the ballot and is turned down by voters, the project may not go any further. He added, his comments to the state and federal agencies with which he has been negotiating, have been the funds from the sale of the property would be used for construction of the facility. If it becomes confused with the ballot and voters saying no, there may be a problem. He suggested the funds from sale of property be used for the design (including future expansion) and build as the user group has stated they want. The city has then lived up to the negotiated commitments. Later council and the community may say to go to bonding to finish the phases. Ross added, council and the Parks & Recreation Commission will make the decision as to designing for future expansion. His recommendation is to do the design and engineering of a phased project to meet the present needs, as well as and construct the facility next year with monies from the sale of properties, i.e. design for future now and construct with money available. KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION June 11, 1998- 7:00 p.m. Kenai City Hall Council Chambers Chairman Thomas Thibodeau *** MINUTES *** ® ® ® ® ® CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Vice Chairman Knackstedt called the meeting to order approximately 7'00 p.m. Members Present: Ron Holloway, Henry Knackstedt, Bob Favretto, Bonnie Koerber, Lucy Lorenzen, Members Absent: James Bielefeld, Tom Thibodeau Also Present: City Manager Rick Ross, Acting Airport Manager Keith Holland, Councilman Raymond Measles, Contract Secretary Barb Roper AGENDA APPROVAL KOERBER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. MOTION SECONDED BY HOLLOWAY. Holland requested that City Manager Rick Ross and Jim Carter be reversed under New Business, Item A. Holland also requested that Item 7c be replaced with the handout he provided before the meeting. AGENDA WAS APPROVED WITH THE REQUESTED CHANGES. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 14, 1998 LORENZEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 14, 1998. MOTION SECONDED BY HOLLOWAY. MINUTES OF MAY 14, 1998 WERE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD - None OLD BUSINESS- None NEW BUSINESS Airport Development ® City Manager Rick Ross Ross reported that Carter gave a presentation to City Council regarding airport development. Council directed Ross to enter into a professional services agreement with Carter to begin the initial stages of implementing Carter's concept. Ross stated that he wanted the Airport Commission's reaction to the concept before a scope of work is developed. Ross continued, he was at the meeting to listen to the Commission's questions on the airport development proposal and to the answers provided by Carter. Jim Carter A copy of Carter's proposal regarding airport development was included in the meeting packet. Carter asked the Commission to follow along as he read excerpts from it. These excerpts highlighted the need for a hub to the Anchorage International Airport for cargo and passenger air carriers. The proposal discusses the expansion of the Kenai Municipal Airport to becoming a world-class economic development hub. Carter gave a brief history on the Anchorage Airport (which was built in December 1951) and its growth to what it is today. He noted that if Anchorage continues to grow it will be out of land in about ten years. Carter provided a cargo landing report which states there was a 17% increase in cargo landings for FY97 and that Anchorage is soundly ahead of other international cargo centers. Carter pointed out that consideration is also given to Fairbanks as an alternate to handle overflow from Anchorage but he believes that carriers would be more interested in the Kenai area as it is only ten minutes from Anchorage with an average winter temperature of 30 degrees. Fairbanks is 30 minutes away with an average winter temperature of 50 degrees below zero. Carter continued, expansion of the Kenai Airport will include constructing a new runway as the existing runway is not designed to handle heavy loads. A letter from John Darrow, a Northwest Airlines 747 pilot who lives in Sterling, was provided. Darrow expressed his interest in the project and would like to see it include a heavy aircraft maintenance facility since there isn't one at the present time. Ail maintenance is performed outside in the weather. Carter discussed the fueling situation in Anchorage and the existing pipeline's age, location and accident history. It was noted this system is one of the worst ten in the country. Carter noted AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1998 Page 2 that work continues on correcting the situation and it will be resolved, however, whatever is done to rectify the problems there will be another crisis in ten years. Carter presented other ideas for usage of the Kenai Airport which included tourism. Flights from overseas could land in Kenai for the start of various tours to work north. This could also be tied in to the many cruise ships that dock in Seward. Tourists can visit the Kenai Peninsula and fly out of Kenai. Carter reported that initial meetings were held with the Corps of Engineers, Salamatof Native Corporation and the Kenaitze Indian Tribe. Salamatof Native Corporation has the land and the Kenaitze Indian Tribe has a gravel pit which could provide materials for a new runway. There was great interest but both organizations were slow to react so it didn't go any further with them. As a result, Carter approached City Council with hopes of making this a City project. Carter provided the Commission with another handout which outlines the duties and responsibilities of a consultant to pursue airport development. These include holding meetings with the Airport Commission and City Manager; seeking Borough-wide support of the project; providing briefings and seek supporting from Kenai area representatives and the Alaska State Legislature; providing briefings and seeking support from the Alaska congressional delegation; meeting with ICAO representatives regarding their involvement in safety and Alaska operations; meeting with U.S. State Department officials regarding bilateral agreements to determine restrictions; visiting at least 12 air carriers, both domestic and international, who may have an interest in the expansion; briefing the Governor's staff as to the objectives of the expansion; involving the National Transportation Safety Board and FAA; and have continuous follow up on all duties. The start-up costs were discussed and Carter reported it would probably be approximately $100,000 per year. This includes expense vouchers, air transportation, meals, vehicle rentals, miscellaneous, etc. Carter anticipates one trip costing in excess of $4,000. Carter believes it is worth it as the Kenai Municipal Airport is the jewel of the Peninsula and where it goes determines where the entire Peninsula would go. Public Comment Dan VanZee, Hertz Car Rental, Kenai, Alaska (283-7291} - asked how many years it would take for such a project and AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1998 Page 3 whether or not there was any interest from various air carriers. Carter replied, there is a lot of research required and it will all be done in phases to include land acquisition, etc. It is possible a new runway could be in place within five years. Carter also stated that air carrier interest is unknown at this time. There may be some that would wait until the runway is built. Bob Bielefeld, Kenai Aviation, Kenai, Alaska (283-4124) - stated that weather should be considered a major factor due to the extensive fog situation in the summer and winter. Bielefeld gave a history of the Kenai Airport and suggested that a new runway be built in another area because of the weather factor. Bielefeld continued, if the runway was built in another area, the 1963 environmental problems would not be an issue. Carter reiterated the intent is to build a new runway and not extend the old. End Public Comment Knackstedt asked if consideration was given to building outside the city limits, such as further north. Carter answered, no, he did not look at the project on that large of scale that all consideration was given to building within the city limits. Carter continued, there is no deal with DNR, Kenaitze Indian Tribe, etc. Favretto asked what the purpose was of building the original Kenai Airport to its current size and magnitude. Carter answered, in the early years FAA built several runways throughout Alaska to connect the smaller communities to a hub which happens to be Anchorage. When the Kenai Airport was built there was no road to Anchorage. Favretto asked if the runway was always the same size. It was noted the original runway was 7,000 feet. Favretto asked when the terminal was built. It was reported the existing terminal was built in the early 1980's. The first terminal was a trailer complex. Favretto asked what the purpose was of the current location. Carter answered, to accommodate the growth of the City. Favretto asked if there was any reason to think there would be an impact on the City. Ross replied, although the exact scope of work has yet to be determined the proposal has a lot of elements and some of the positives and negatives are already known. The Fairbanks Airport needs help and this is recognized by the State, FAA, etc., This project will be up against those entities right from the beginning. Additionally, the Kenai Airport expansion is visionary and the key element is interest from the air carriers. AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1998 Page 4 Ross continued, if the City enters into a contract with Carter it would be done on a phase basis and after each phase Carter will come back to the Airport Commission and City Council with a detailed report. The Airport Commission and/or City Council will determine after each report whether or not to continue on to the next phase. Ross thought the first thing that needs to be done is to determine air carrier interest followed by identification of a land mass since it was unlikely the new runway would be built within the City as there is no suitable land mass in the city due to environmental issues. Knackstedt asked at what level the commitment from the air carriers would be. Ross replied, it would have to be above the local manager level. The project will require extensive federal funds and commitments from air carriers. Ross continued, Carter will provide a billing with each activity report and that the City has no interest in a multi-year contract for a consultant. Knackstedt asked if Anchorage was doing anything with regard to the growth. Carter answered, consideration was given at one time to building an airport in Wasilla where there are large land masses. This never did get off the ground and is not in the works today. Koerber asked how the project would be funded. Ross replied, the City will depend on FAA funds and they would have to agree this project is viable. It is possible that State funding could be available as well but that too will come through the FAA. Ross pointed out a project of this magnitude will require a massive amount of funding as it will not only inclUde a new runway but aprons, fuel farms, etc. This could run over $100 million. Knackstedt stated, based on that amount, the small investment made on initial research by a consultant is worth it. Ross added, the scope of work will be determined and an hourly rate negotiated. The research will go as far as the Airport Commission and Council wants it to go. Once the air carrier interest is established and the land mass identified, the work will go well beyond what Carter is qualified to do. Knackstedt asked how large the multi-runway/airport will be. Carter replied, at this time he envisions one runway and support systems based on needs. If the runway is built in another area then consideration needs to be given to infrastructure, taxiways, fuel, etc. Holloway thought this was a good concept. Favretto thought this project could tie into the responsibilities of the new Airport Manager who could assist Carter with the research. Ross responded, interviews for the new Airport AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1998 Page 5 Manager will take place within the next couple of weeks. Once hired, the Manager will concentrate his efforts on developing the existing airport and not be involved in the research presented by Carter. HOLLOWAY MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL APPRO~ THE PROPOSAL BY CARTER FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT. MOTION SECONDED BY FAVRETTO. VOTE HOLLOWAY Yes KOERBER Yes KNACKSTEDT Yes FAVRETTO Yes LORENZEN Yes Motion passed unanimously. Ross thanked the Commission for their input. AIRPORT MANAGER'S REPORT a® Taxiway Project Update' be Holland reported there were delays, in painting and finish grading due to poor weather. The taxiway should be useable once this work is complete. Changes in the project have been initiated by FAA and include remarldng the runways to left and fight and signage on both runways. Airport Manager Search Update- Holland indicated that Ross covered most of the Airport Manager update earlier in the meeting. A candidate will be in Kenai from June 20 through June 23 which will start the interview process. May 1998 Enplanement Report The May 1998 Enplanement Report included in the packet was replaced by the handout provided before the meeting due to some incorrect figures. de Airport Terminal Painting The terminal is being repainted in several areas. Several inquires were received regarding the photos being removed. They will be replaced once the painting is complete. AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1998 Page 6 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 13 VOTE: ~~ie were no objections. SO ORDERED- Resolution No. 98-43 - Awarding the Bid for KPSB Fire Department Apparatus Room Lighting Replacement - 1998 to Kachemak Electr/c, Inc. for a Total Amount of $17,998. MOTION: Counc/lman Booke¥ MOVED for adopt/on of Resolution No. 98-43 and requested UNANIMOUS CONSENT. Councilwoman Swarner SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. BREAK TAKEN: 7:55 P.M. BACK TO ORDER: 8:10 P.M. ITEM D' COMMISSION! COMMITTEE REPORTS D-X. Council on Aging- No report. Airport Commission Measles reported a meeting was held on June 1 ! at which time a presentation was made by Jim Carter regarding airport development. Measles referred to a memorandum included in the packet from Ross reporting on the meeting. Ross reported Carter gave the same presentation to the Airport Commission as he did to council and it was very well received. There was genuine interest expressed. Land masses and where was also discussed. The consensus was there was no land mass in Kenai. With comments made in the meeting and talking with City Engineer La Shot, getting dimensions from Acting Airport Manager Holland, and based on a 10,500 foot strip with what is needed on both ends for instrument approach, a land mass of three miles and up to one mile wide will be needed. There is no land mass in Kenai which would be acceptable for that project due to population, wetlands, or could not be developed. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 14 Ross continued. Commissioners suggested the city would have to look two to three miles northwest of the city to find a land mass available. Ross noted a report was referred to and he is tryfi'ng to get a copy of it to see if there are other sites identified in the past. This would be a hurdle council would have to review. Ross suggested identifying land mass, ownership, and availability may be the first thing needing to be investigated. Ross added, he had intended to recommend funding from the Airport Fund for a contract, however it is the opinion of administration those funds, dedicated to the Kenai Municipal Airport and development of it, could not be used to award a contract for development of a new airport. He will be discussing this with FAA, however in the past, uses not involving aviation uses required good justifications or paying lease rates. Ross continued, administration does not believe FAA will be accepting of using Airport Funds to develop a new airport which would not be within the city limits. If so, general funds would be needed to pay for such a contract. Ross requested council give thought to the development of an airport outside of the city limits. Jim Carter- Reported he thought the Airport Commission was very receptive to his presentation. A comment was made that considering the magnitude of the project, the cost for initially surveying the industry who would use it was not out of line. He added, the wetlands concerns, etc. have been dealt with in the past for development of other airports, etc. However, they are still concerns that will need addressing. Carter noted, he had a private conversation with Governor Knowles during his visit to Kenai and discussed the development of an airport..Uthough there were no commitments, he was interested and asked Carter to contact the Deputy Commissioner of the DOT. In speaking with the Commissioner of Commerce. investigation of more regional airports was discussed in consideration of tourism throughout the state. Carter stated he believed the project was viable within the five- to-ten-year time flame. Williams stated, this would be a major project and if investigation is not made, the viability will not be known. He noted the city, in the past, spent funds to investigate the building of a harbor and stabilizing the bluff. Neither occurred, but funds were expended to do the exploration of the possibility. Williams added, other companies could be used for this investigation which would cost more and the amount of information would be the same. Williams continued, the Charter allows council to own and develop properties and enterprises outside the boundaries of the city.. However, he was concerned about the proximity of the Kenai Wildlife Refuge and the Moose Range to the city, though there are lands between Wildwood and the Wildlife Refuge that are not wetlands and KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 15 capable of supporting an airport. Air traffic can be allowed over the Wildlife Refuge. Construction may or may not be a problem. Williams requested council to take a "leap of faith~ to explore this possibility. Swarner stated she would wait until an answer is received in regard to using airport funds. She added, if airport funds could not be used, she was not ready to use General Fund monies. Smalley stated he thought council needs to look to the future and would like to think there ~vas a possibility of using airport funds to contract with Carter to investigate carrier interest in the city which could mean modification of the Kenai Airport or development of an airport outside the city.. Smalley asked if would be possible to use airport funds if the contract spoke to assessment of interest, plans and support. Williams stated, he thought if had to do with the realm of the airport and a site not yet established, ~vhether it would be in or out of the city or an extension of the present facility or development of a new facility, it could be possible FAA would fund the contract. Measles stated he thought the intent of the contract was to investigate the feasibility of the expansion of the Kenai Airport for the purpose of handling cargo or heavy aircraft. At some point in the study a determination would have to be made of whether it would be possible to do it. If there was any possible way to put it at this airport or in proximity of the airport, it would make it easier, i.e. one control tower, one FAA facility handling both runways. Bookey stated he would not support the development of an airport outside the city unless property on which a new airport would be constructed could be annexed for taxation into the city. t3ookey added, he would absolutely not support use of general funds unless it could be structured like Measles suggested. Ross stated, the testimony he heard at the Airport Commission and at council was that the present runway is not structured physically to handle heav~ jet traffic or would it be acceptable to the surrounding community. Williams stated, these are the items needing to be investigated. He added, if a lateral runway was built {four miles long) and remain as an integral part of the city and one end would be used for commuter service and the other for freight, it would still be a part of a single runway. Williams continued, there is the possibility the present control tower, if raised two or three stories, could accommodate both runways. Those are needing investigation. Measles added, to be a part of the Kenai Airport does not necessarily have to have that runway or extension of that runway. The other runway could be offset by a mile laterally and still be a part of the Kenai Airport. Ross stated he would correspond with FAA and ask them if airport funds can be used for a contract to investigate a new runway system. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 17, 1998 PAGE 16 Williams restated, the city will contact FAA, look for funding, bring funding back if it is available, and if not, the matter will be discussed further. Williams added, he believed the $100,000 for the contract with Carter could come from either airpo~ or general funds, and would be funds well spent for the future of the Kenai Airport and the peninsula. Measles stated he didn't think there would be a problem in spending airport funds to do the investigation. IWilhams noted, the city manager had been authorized to proceed with r~pCOrrespondence with FAA. Time delays would be in place, but council would expect a orr back at the next council meeting. D-3. Harbor Commission Councilman Bookey reported the meeting was short, however the Commission discussed the offer made by Alan Norville representing the Kenai River Classic (to be discussed at Item H-9 in this meeting). 9-4. Library Commission Councilman Moore noted the next meeting was scheduled for July 7. Do5o Parks/is Recreation Commission Councilman Bannock reported the minutes of the June 4 meeting were included in the packet. Parks & Recreation Director Frates reported most of the meeting discussion was in regard to the presentation of Alan Norville about Cunningham Park improvements. Frates added, discussion also included transforming Municipal Park into a viable park through cleanng of beetle-killed trees, etc. Frates reported, the clearing was planned for July 1 in conjunction with the Lions Club project work. Frates noted, the Third Annual Fun Run was scheduled for June 20 and would begin at the Art Guild building at 10:00 a.m. 9-6. Planning/h Zoning Commission Councilman Smalley requested an action agenda of meetings be included when minutes are not available. Smalley reported the following: 1. The sign variance request, which had been postponed, was approved, without the requested lighting; KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 3, 1998 PAGE 14 recreational facility.. The process is on track to have the property transferred to the city and Navarre is in full support of the project. Ross added, staff believed Blocks 1 and 2 of Five Iron Subdivision will be available for sale in late July or August. He has asked that a committee be formed to review the original design of the building as well as several ideas between the users and council as to the design and construction time table for the facility. He would like the committee to include a member of the Parks & Recreation Commission, administrative staff, users and a council member. The ideas to discuss are Whether the facility should be designed and built in one package with no plan for expansion or refrigeration (if this plan is chosen, it would be doubtful that the facility could be used a couple months this season), or design/engineenng in phases, planning for future expansion and refrigeration and going to construction next year. Ross added, at this time Nikiski is trying to resolve how to retrofit their ice facility. His personal opinion is that this issue needs to be resolved as the facility will be projected into the future to accept refrigeration and that it would be shortsighted to build the facility this year and then have to retrofit something not originally engineered. Airport Development Proposal- Ross referred to his memorandum included in the packet regarding the Airport Development Proposal scope of work. He reported he had received a call from John Sanders of Aries (Airport Master Plan contractl who asked if this work could be added to their present contract. He told them no and that the city was reviewing the possibility of negotiating a professional services contract. Ross added, he and Jim Carter will be reviewing the matter with the Airport Commission and will report back as to their comments. Ross' points were: le e Get a feeling for what the cargo carriers future plans are and how they see the city fitting into them. What commitments will they give in writing and what level of support will they give to the project. Upon review of those answers, the council can make a decision to either continue or not. Then identify masses of land that would be suitable for this project and the ownership of that property. After council reviews this information, a decision can be made to continue or not. If these items come into play, further contracting can be conducted that is more general, i.e. facilitation of a public meeting where carriers are present, information is available, strategies, expertise needed, sites and public opinion gathered. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 3, 1998 PAGE 15 Ross added, this is the direction he plans on talcing unless council objects. There were no objections stated. Jim Carter - Carter stated he didn't believe there was anything he and Ro~s couldn't work out in regard to the proposal. He added, he is aware the scope of work is narrow, but he feels there are some items that can be incorporated into it such as having the support of other borough' communities and chambers of commerce. The support will be meaningful to the carriers and congressional delegation. W~l!iams noted, Carter and Ross will work out deta/ls and will discuss the matter with the Airport Commi~aion on June 11. The contract will be brought back to council for review and approval. Willies referred back to the multi-purpose recreational facility and noted he discussed the state of the City during his preaentation at the Kenai Chamber of Commerce luncheon. In his presentation, he outlined the value of the city, its assets and the level of debt. Williams suggested the building committee review l~lacing a bond question on the ballot for the building of the multi-use facility. He added, the question should be designed to ask if the citizens would be willing to join, by way of debt, an already agreed-to amount to come from other sources. He asked this be investigated with the thought of placing the question on the October, 1998 ballot. Bookey asked what amount would be included in the bond. Williams suggested $2.5 million (with refrigeration), adding approximately $450,000 to $500,000 earned from the sale of the Five Irons property. Ross stated, if the question is on the ballot and is turned down by voters, the project may not go any further. He added, his comments to the state and federal agencies with which'he has been negotiating, have been the funds from the sale of the property would be used for construction of the facility. If it becomes confused with the ballot and voters saying no, there may be a problem. He suggested the funds from sale of property be used for the design (including future expansion) and build as the user group has stated they want. The city has then lived up to the negotiated commitments. Later council and the community may say to go to bonding to finish the phases. Ross added, council and the Parks & Recreation Commission will make the decision as to designing for future expansion. His recommendation is to do the design and engineering of a phased project to meet the present needs, as well as and construct the facility next year with monies from the sale of properties, i.e. design for future now and construct with money available. ® These facilities do not make special arrangements for smoking shelters, etc. If a person wants to smoke they know they have to do it outside. It was also noted the efforts being made are not so much for airport users but for the employees that work there. The general consensus was to leave the terminal smoke-flee with the designated smoking areas outside and when problems arise, they should be dealt with individually. It was also noted if Council wishes to do something more, then consideration needs to be given to moving the smoking area on either side of the terminal building but still outside. HOLLOWAY MOVED TO LEAVE THE SMOKING AREA AS IS. MOTION SECONDED BY BIELEFELD. VOTE HOLLOWAY Yes BIELEFELD Yes KNACKSTEDT Yes FAVI/ETTO Yes VAN ZEE No LORENZEN Yes THIBODEAU Yes Yes, 1 No- Motion passed. AIRPORT MANAGER'S REPORT Atha reported he is still getting integrated into the community by meeting with Economic Development, various Chambers, etc. Atha stated he would still like to have lunch with Commissioners on an individual basis. Atha feels good about the airport and its potential and looks forward to developing promotional packages to bring more business in. Favretto stated he saw the second draft of the contract with Jim Carter and reported Carter was disgruntled with it. Apparently Carter thinks the contract is too restrictive. Favretto asked that the contract not go to City Council until the Airport Commission has an opportunity to go over it before Carter decides not to do it. Favretto suggested a meeting with Carter, the City Manager and the Airport Commission. Bielefeld stated there is a lot of concern with airport leaseholders regarding this contract as they fear the airport closing and affecting their business. Bannock explained the City Council had never discussed closing the existing airport or even building another terminal. Regarding the Carter contract, Bannock explained the contract is not to go out and build a new airport nor was it to go out and see if the existing airport should be expanded. The basis of the contract is to firstly define a need. Once the need is defined, consideration will be given to how the resources can be tailored to accommodate that need. Bannock reiterated, any talk of~expanding the present airport or building a new airport is premature even to the issue of Carter and the contract. Bannock Kenai Airport Commission September 10, 1998 Page 2 Se e 10. lcontinued, $100,000 could be spent to end up saying it won't work. Bielefeld indicated he would pass this information on which would hopefully diminish any fears the leaseholders may have. Thibodeau asked about the status of the gravel runway. Holland reported the runway is still closed as staff is waiting for the new signs to arrive. The grass strip will remain open until the gravel runway is open. Holland continued, once the signs are received and the pads are poured, the runway will be available for use. It is anticipated this could happen as soon as the end of the month. Holland stated the publication changes have been submitted. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND (~~TIONS Commissioner Thibodeau asked if there was an increase in airfare. After a brief discussion it was noted ERA will be increasing their rates by a few dollars on October 1, 1998. This increase is to cover tax increases. Discussion took place on SouthCentral Air. Bielefeld stated SouthCentral did not shut down, they just changed their operations. Bielefeld continued, the airline was not supported by the community therefore they had to make the change. Seventeen percent of the air carrier business was not enough to continue. It was pointed out a larger carrier is needed to hold a commuter airline together: one that offers benefits such as mileage, etc. Knackstedt asked about Atha's plans for business development at the airport. Atha replied, these issues will be discussed further once he is more settled. Knackstedt suggested brain-storming sessions be held with the Commission throughout the winter. PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD - None INFORMATION ITEMS be Kenai City Council Meeting Action Agenda -- August 19, 1998 and September 2, 1998 August, 1998 Enplanement Report 11. ADJOURNMENT HOLLOWAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, Barbara Roper, Contract Secretary Kenai Airport Commission September 10, 1998 Page 3 KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 Page 2 ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS-- None. ITEM C' PUBLIC HEARINGS C-lo Ordinance No. 1793-98 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $7,000 in the General Fund for Pubhc Library Assistance Grant. MOTION: Councilman Moore MOVED for approval of Ordinance No. 1793-98 and Councilman Smaller SECONDED the motion. There were no public or council comments. VOTE: Smalley: Yes Williams: Yes Bookey: Absent Swarner: Yes Moore: Yes Measles: Yes Bannock: Yes MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C-2. Ordinance No. 1794-98-- Appropriating $100,000 for an Airport Expansion and Development User Interest Survey. MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED for adoption of Ordinance No. 1794-98 and Councilman Smalley SECONDED the motion. Herb Schann -- 1506 Toyon Way, Kenai. Schann stated he opposed the appropriation of the $100,000. He continued, he believed the appropriating of the funds is a way to get a project started that could be very destructive to the quality of life in Kenai. He noted, the citizens have not been asked if they want the expansion of the airport. He added, he believed it is the job of the council and the citizens to preserve a good quality of life. At this time, the touch-and-goes by airplanes are already intrusive in the lives of citizens and even if the airport were moved two miles away, it would not be an improvement. Schann added, he believed the funds for this proposal should not be wasted no matter what fund it comes from and is a proposal that ignores the citizens and the quality of the people who live in Kenai. As guardians of the welfare of Kenai, he requested council reject the $100,000 and focus their attention on getting the opinion of the citizens of the community. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 Page 3 Williams read into the record a letter from Rebecca Lambourn, distributed at the beginning of the meeting. It read' It is my understanding that there is a proposal to spend $100,000 on a user survey for refueling large jets at an expanded Kenai airport. I feel that money spent on this project is wasteful and neglect~l on the impact upon quality of life for the citizens of Kenai. It would be more responsible for money to be spent upon stud.ving the effects of excess noise upon the quality of life and mental health of people living near the airport. The effect on property, values and pollution should also be considered before a user's survey is done. Most importantly, the issue of safety for those living near the airport needs to be addressed. We have already had an incident in which a small aircraft crashed into a home near the Kenai airport. There seems to be an assumption by the city that sometime soon we will need to handle jets at the Kenai airport anyway to handle traffic. However, we cannot currently sustain even two small passenger carriers. It is the trend in most of the United States for small population areas and even moderately sized towns to be served by larger hubs with connecting small carriers, with no need for jets. It has also been proposed and reported in the Anchorage Daily News that the existing airport may be moved to an area two miles to the north of its present location. This puts the burden of annoyance and risk on the northern Kenai neighborhoods that are still too near the proposed location for safety and noise aggravation. Will our city be faced with the possibility of having to buy out whole neighborhoods? More importantly, the current noise levels resulting from Kenai airport traffic needs immediate action. There has been a drastic increase in the frequency and duration of military training, "touch and go landings" in the latter half of this summer. For example, last Wednesday, evening, from 5:00 until 8:00 P.M., a C-130 practiced repetitive low, tight, slow tums directing over our houses in Redoubt Subdivision. Every five minutes we had to stop conversation, phone calls and have our relaxation disturbed until the noise abated. We had to abandon a pleasant summer evemng outdoors and go inside and shut all windows and doors. Our rights to a relaxing evening family time after a long da~v were violated. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 Page 4 The following day during the late morning a military helicopter circled over our house every four minutes for an d hour and a half. Ten minutes after it went away, the C-130 showed up again circling every six minutes for much of the afternoon. My daughter was at home with a severe headache trying to get some rest so that she could return to school, and the incessant circling of a very loud airplane over our home was unnerving and harassing. We ended up turning on very loud fans to try to overcome the noise. This military training over the tops of our homes has become a daily occurrence, sometimes three times a day and carriers on for several hours. If this is any indication of what it would be like living underneath circling DC-10's or 747s, and they do frequently need to circle, all of us in Kenai will be suffering. Let's try to alleviate the current noise aggravation and safety risk to our homes and families before we expose ourselves to anymore. Thank you, S/ Rebecca Lamboum Smalley asked if the Airport Commission has discussed the expansion of the airport, the Airport Master Plan, etc. Measles answered, yes, the Commission has discussed the matter and met with Mr. Carter and discussed the proposal. He added, the previous Airport Master Plan discussed the expansion of the airport, however it was taken out of the recently updated Plan. Measles noted, this project would be considered a new airport project and not be an expansion of the existing airport and therefore would not be covered in the Airport Master Plan. Measles added, all the Airport Master Plans have been subject to public hearings prior to the acceptance of the plans, each time they are changed. Councilwoman Swarner asked how often reports will be received from Carter. City Manager Ross answered, those requirements are included in the contract which appears on the agenda at Item G-1. Williams noted, due to the flue, Mr. Carter would not be able to attend this meeting and requested the matter be postponed. Measles suggested the matter be tabled until the next meeting when they reach G-1. Councilman Moore stated had been contacted by several citizens. He noted, when council discussed the project, it was determined it was not feasible to expand the existing airport and that may be confusing in regard to how the ordinance reads "airport expansion." Smalley stated, he believed any potential development at the airport could be considered expansion. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 Page 5 Ross stated, the contract is to acquire a user survey. It is not appropriate to pre- suppose the results will be heavy jet traffic or necessarily that council will move the airport. It will look for options for airport expansion, what the market will be now and the future, and if movement of the airport might happen in the future, what type of aircraft would be using it. Williams commented, after listening to a recent candidate forum, he agreed with comments made by some of the candidates, i.e. when they decided to run for public office they thought they knew what the questions and answers were and after being elected they found they knew only about half of what they thought they knew, as well as administration, etc. Williams continued, it would be helpful if the public would comment during public meetings in order to have a clear understanding of what the present and future plans are for the city. Williams continued, in regard to the airport, the acquisition of the report w/Il help in determining some of the answers for questions and concerns stated by Ms. Lamboum, i.e. mitigation of noise, review of the area to determine need, etc. Williams added, the baseline study will be used to determine many factors including possible total removal of the airport from the city and whether there is a position for the area to serve as a stopover point for heavy carriers hauling freight (knowing "the area" could encompass a major sector of the Peninsula when searching for the proper site). Continuing, Williams stated, if a "go ahead" is received this year, it could be ten years prior to the opening of the proposed airport. If nothing is done between now and then in regard to the developing economy and changes in the world system, the city w/Il be twenty years behind. Williams noted, the area is supported by oil and fishing and both industries are failing. As the tax base diminishes, something else will have to take the place of those industries. With the loss of tax base, the quality of life will be affected through lack of education for the children, lack of jobs, etc. Williams added, the city has been preparing itself for the future by putting in service industries, etc. However, the city will not be able to continue this or afford to do it in the future. Programs the city undertakes are necessary for the future of the entire community and Williams added, he believed the city was moving in the right direction. VOTE: Smalley: Yes Williams- Yes Bookey: Absent Swarner: Yes Moore' Yes Measles' Yes Bannock: Yes MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 14 ITEM F: CORRF~PONDENCE ITEM G: OLD BUSINESS Residence Requirement-- Vintage Pointe Manor MOTION: Councilwoman Swarner MOVED to amend Section 4, Item C to read, "The applicant and any other occupant other than a caregiver authorized pursuant to this agreement must have resided in Alaska for six months prior to the date the application for an apartment is submitted." Councilman Measles SECONDED the motion. Semor Director Porter stated she felt the amendment was justified. The Council on Aging had agreed with the one-month residency requirement. However, after council stated their concern with the 30-day residency requirement during their last meeting, she discussed the matter with Ross and Attorney Graves. They. agreed a sm-month residency requirement might be more appropriate. She added, the Council on Aging would like the six-month requirement better. VOTE: There were no objections. SO ORDERED. G-2o Professional Services Contract -- James Carter MOTION: Councilman Measles MOVED to approve the professional services contract as submitted to Mr. James Carter. Councilman Bannock SECONDED the motion. Williams noted he was quoted in the newspaper as saying those who were concerned about the issue were probably a couple of years ahead of schedule relating to their concerns. He added, the crown jewel of the city is the airport which it received from the federal government. Without the airport, the city would not be the city it is today. Williams continued, for a long time it has been recognized the airport lays dead center in the city, between the residential and business sections of town. Neither of these areas can expand inward because of the airport. Over the last ten years the city has paid over $.5 million for studies (Airport Master Plan) in regard t'o the airport. The Master Plan once called for expanding the runway to 10,000 feet and KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 15 now calls for expanding to 8,000 feet. Williams noted, the Master Plan cost the city $.25 million and had a lot of support and received a lot of input from the public (through public hearings, etc.) Also, history shows the city has been sued over the issue of the airport (noise concerns). They did not prevail. Also, the jet traffic has been reduced in the last 25 years. Over the years, a lot has been done to mitigate noise problems. Williams added, one subdivision was not developed due to public concerns regarding the airport. This can create a financial disadvantage to the city. Williams continued, there have been discussions before council and the Airport Commission about buying more land to buffer the residential areas. In taking those suggestions into consideration and still wanting to move ahead in development and the 21,t century, and how to support the quality of life once oil dries up, other means of commerce need to investigated. Williams added, this is only one of those items needing investigation. Williams continued, in putting together the idea of a baseline study, the city is trying to determine whether there is market and would the airport be better off, twenty years from now, being moved to a different location several miles out of town. Williams added, a long-range cargo-hauling airport, would have to have an area about three miles long to accommodate its runway and safety zone and probably one mile wide. He noted, the council meeting minutes of June 3 stated there is no land mass within the city to accommodate an airport, based on a 10,500 strip, about three miles of land would be needed. Unless these ideas are investigated now and the city moves toward some direction, ten years from now there may be concerns voiced by the public that the investigation should have been done ten years ago or not. Without the study, the basic answers will not be gathered to allow moving ahead. Williams continued, almost every major project that has brought benefit to the ci~ started with a baseline study (congregate housing, Public Health Nurse facility, ARFF). The study would work toward a program that may be ten to twenty years away. Williams added, this is not a move to start an airport in the near future and def'mitely not a move to build an airport on top of the present airport. Smalley asked W~ll~ams to speak to discussions from the Economic Development Forum held two years ago. Williams reported the city held a quorum about two years ago. Approximately 100 people attended to study the whole economic outlook for the city and its future. Williams added, two items were the mare concerns -- continued development of the airport, commerce and business around the airport and development of retail sector within the city. Williams noted, a comment made to him recently was that there was far less retail business in the city than there was 25 years ago when there was jet service to the city. Williams added, if the city did not have the airport, would cause the city not to be more than what it was 40 years ago. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 16 Verbatim Begins' Bob Molloy -- Stated he had been asked to read a letter into the record from Betty Glick, a former councilwoman and former president of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly. Molloy read, From Betty J. Glick, Kenai, Alaska re contract -- Jim Carter. For 22 years as an appointed or elected official, I have promoted projects for this city at the local, state and when necessary, the national levels. Also, during that time, I have always advocated that we follow the process and/or procedures. I fully support long-term planning. To award this questionable (underlined twice) contract tonight would e to ignore an established process, that is, there have not been any public hearings/forums to gather needed information for or against this project. My understand is that the contractor will promote the project. But, I am not aware the council has taken a definite vote on the project. I respectfully submit a process for the council's consideration: le , e Refer this issue to the Airport Commission. They can hold public hearings, develop a survey/study procedure or write a letter to prospective users for their input. This would be one of their long-term goals. Upon compilation of the information, call a meeting of the congressional delegation, state legislative delegation, local elected officials and the PUBLIC to disseminate the information. Everyone gets the same information at the same time. If the council decides to move ahead on the project, each council member should do his/her part by lobbying everyone who can help. I respect~lly request the council to not approve this contract or at the very least postpone action on it. As an afterthought, if items 1, 2, and 3 are followed, it won't cost the city $100,000 but will accomplish the same objective. Thank you for your time. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 17 Molloy requested the letter be entered as part of the record. Marshall: My name's Dick Marshall. My address is 37186 Cannery Road. Admittedly, that is not in the, not in the city of Kenai, it's outside it, but would be just as heavily impacted there as anybody in the city. Mayor Williams, you described a proposed contract as a baseline study. I disagree with that. The scope of services emphasi~ the seeking support of the project. Not the kind of baseline information that is typical of the baseline study. With respect to your statement that negative discussion on the airport is two or three years m, before, two or three years premature, I disagree with that again. I think negative discussion should be part of the process from the very get-go. I can think of perhaps no other type of activity that has the potential for adversely impacting so many people as the comings and goings of cargo jets. Noise, you mentioned, is the most obvious impact, but degradation of air quality can have some very serious, long-term implications and should be part of a baseline study. The visual impact. Everybody up here is, we have awesome view the mountains across the Inlet. Those views would never, never again be the same if we had those jets coming and going in the foreground of those views. A proper baseline study would address issues like this. I mi'ght note that in my opinion, moving the airport several miles, you used that term several miles to the north, would not automatically mitigate these impacts. That's just a matter of a few seconds in the comings and goings of cargo jets. I would like to conclude my comments by urging the council as it seeks wavs to diversify Kenai's economy that you keep in mind, you mentioned, Mayor W~lliams, quality, of life. That's why we live here. Because of the quality of life that we find here in Kenai and it's a special place. I ask that you please keep it that way. North: My name is Phil North and I live at 3810 Wild Rose Avenue and I suspect a lot of the comments are going to, are going to be the same and so...I understand the need for economic growth and I support it and I actually applaud the city for the, for the workshop that you did on bringing people in to talk about economic growth within the city. That kind of forum is the kind of forum perhaps that this discussion should be happening in. But, I think that there's a, that there's a problem when that kind of economic growth again detracts from quality of life. I'm not a long-time resident of Kenai. I've lived here since this past danuary and I moved down from Anchorage in ,January. In Anchorage I lived in South Anchorage for about six years and then in Turnagam for two years. And in Tumagain I was woken up just about every night, about two or three in the morning from the cargo jets taking off. When I sold my house there, I guess over two years, I got k/nd of used to being woken up. When I sold my house KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 18 there, the people who bought it came back to me a couple months later and said, "you didn't tell us about the noise from the airport." Tumagam in Anchorage is famous for being disturbed by the cargo jets taking off from the airport. I also lived about seven miles away from the airport in South Anchorage and it was less frequent that I was woken up there, but the same problem existed there because as the previous comrnenter said, several miles is a few seconds to a bid jet like that and they are very noisy. You know, people have been asking me, since I just moved down, people have been asking me, how is it to live in Kenai. They all wondered why I was coming here. I guess some people in Anchorage think that Anchorage would be a better place to live and I just have to tell them that this is a great place to live. I really thoroughly enjoy living here. It's, and mainly because it's a small, quiet town. Not so small, that there's nothing here. We do have an existing airport and that creates a lot of activity and it is a center of commerce, for this part of the Peninsula, but it's also a quiet town and I really would like it to stay that way and cargo jets, even if they're north of the city aways will take away, what that will do is it will bring one of the negative aspects of Anchorage, which is the noise, and it will bring it to Kenai and I don't think that's a good thing for Kenai. Again, I have to disagree with your quote of you Mr. Mayor in the Clarion, and that now is the time for people to get involved. So, and then, I don't like just to be a naysayer and not suggest an alternative and so, what I guess what I'd like to suggest is in place of this contract, to hire a good facilitator and have a workshop or a series of workshops on this topic and make it perhaps more specific, more specific workshops on the elements of the economic plan on what direction they should go. The economic plan talked about continuing to develop the airport. Well, you've taken that subject up and this is your proposal, but I think maybe you should get more specific input from citizens and see if this particular proposal really is one that, that people would like. And, and, I'm not talking about a hearing-type forum. I'm a federal employee and I'm convinced that, that hearings a waste of time both for the people who are holding the hearing and the people who are attending the hearing. What we really need is a good discussion where people can exchange ideas and discuss ideas and truly develop them. Williams: Are there any questions from council as we move through this? All right. Thank you very much. Yes, please come forward. State your name for the record. Wagoner: My name is Tom Wagoner. I live at 4040 Primrose in Kenai. I am a resident in the city of Kenai and glad it's you folks up there and not me. I went through some of similar hearings when I was mayor and also served on the council several years ago and one thing we had looked at several times was airport expansion. I, you know, it's really funny. I come with some of these people, they're friends of mine, we're on the same side of an issue one time and the next time we're on the' other side of the issue. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 19 But, I have happen to be a person who does have a commercial building and as a matter of fact, there's nobody in this room who has a building closer to the end of the airport than mme. And, yeah, there's some noise and there's some discomfort. I have a 2400 square foot, three-bedroom apartment at the top of my commercial building, but it's not that uncomfortable. Folks, you're looking a somebody who spent the second, third and fourth night of their honeymoon in a house that was located at the southern approach of SeaTac Airport. If you want to have a horrible and horrifying experience, wake up some night unexpectedly and look out and see a jet coming in your bedroom window. It's, it's, it's a plight, this was 35 years ago, and I got to tell you, I worked at Boeing Company, I worked on a 707 project and the first thing people talk about is noise pollution. Well, there's a lot less noise pollution with jets now than there used to be. And there are ways to work around some of those problems. There's alwa.vs going to be problems with an airport. But this airport, you know, Mayor Williams said it earlier in one manner of speaking, but this airport probably is the most important asset the City of Kenai has to offer both the Peninsula and the taxpayers of the City of Kenai. And without some of the income generated by that airport, a lot of us couldn't live in this city and afford to live here and live in the manner we live in. And so, I, rm in favor of this study. I'd like to endorse it. This study, may say there's no sense in going any further. You know, and that's one of the oUtcomes you may, you may have in a year, year and one-half, two years and that's something you may have to face. But I will tell you this. I travel outside a lot and it's amazing to go to some of the airports I go through and see what people in towns three and four times the size of Kenai have and look and see what we've got. Yeah, we've got a nice airport and because of the location we're at and the transportation we could be, maybe we need, maybe we'll have a nice one. Maybe it'll be out north. Maybe it's going to be similar to the one that was designed, oh '1. 970 and 71 I believe itwas with a double runway running out over Wildwood where the traffic would be away from the housing. So, you lmow, those are the things we've got to look at and we've got to see. We've got to see if it's feasible. We've got to see if the support's there from the federal government. So, I, I endorse the study. Thank you. Williams- Questions of Mr. Mayor? All fight. I have to make a comment with regard to what was said of the federal government. Recently, the federal administration, Vice President Gore was on television and he was decrying the, the condition of the airports of America today and he was putting them somewhat in context with our highway system fight after the second World War. You recall that when Eisenhower became president he laid into operation the construction of the National Highway System across America which really improved transportation, and thus commerce all over the United States. Congress is looking and the administration is looking at the same situation that now exists with our airways. They're failing us. The airports are old and decrepit. The systems are run down. They're having continuous problems that they're trying to KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 20 redevelop. Congress anticipates spending $200 Billion in order to improve the airways and make them safer and build new airports over the next several years. So, air traffic and technology and all of that is with us and again, looking toward the future, if we want to move ahead with the rest of society and the rest of the world, part of that $200 Billion has to be spent here in Kenai in my opinion. But, anyway, more comments, please. Schrag: Mark Schrag. 312 Princess. I can support. I support a baseline study also, but I guess my concern is that it needs to be based in reality because if it's, if it isn't based in reality somehow, you start the road towards a white elephant, which I know nobody wants here. I guess it concerns me that if you have the person that brings the vision to you, you don't give them the responsibility of finding out whether it's feasible or not. So that's my greatest concern. If we fred out that it's realistic in that it's feasible, then I think Mr. Carter is probably a good person to go ahead and give a contract to for promoting it which the contract that I read here, if this is the same one you're going to do, it does seem like it's mostly promotion. I don't see where it deals with a lot of the feasibility things. So, so that's what concerns me. I say, do the baseline study, but I think it should be a more neutral party that, at this point, that starts, that starts this process. Because if it's not, if it's not based in reality, you know, we're going to be in trouble. Thank you. Williams' The city manager has indicated a comment. Ross: To address that concern, on the scope of work, discussions that have occurred in the past with council was the, the aspect that administration's approach would be a phasing approach. If you've looked at the contract, it requires 90- preplans in advance of the 90-day work. It requires plans to come in after council to approve the next step. Back in June when this was discussed, we discussed phasing with council and possibly the scope of work doesn't lay this out as cleanly as it should, but initially there would be a market survey of the air, aviation industry, where they're headed, where they are headed in aviation in Alaska the next 20, 30 years. Are there opportunities for Kenai participate and at what level. These would be coming back to council. I would encourage all of the public to be at those meetings when it's on the agenda to, to listen to that aspect. The lobbying aspect, and this again may not be too clear, but this study is just a very preliminary. Beyond the initial are there opportunities, now you have to identify where is the land mass that would support it, what are the environmental concerns in that land mass, both the noise enveloping and so forth. To do that takes quite a bit of money. There's where the lobbying comes m. At that point, we would be looking to lobby the federal government to come up with the money necessary to actually do the planning of an airport. This is somewhat down the road. After that point, we've left Mr. Carter's expertise. Now, if it goes further and the public in this community says they want it, it looks feasible, now we're going to have to look to airport planners, engineers to actually say in reality, is it feasible in the KEN~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 21 locations that are acceptable. And ah, I see this as a fairly long-term project with some stop points. After the first ninety days or after the f~rst 180 days, council may look at the product that's come back in as far as Where the aircraft industry and aviation industry in Alaska is headed and say there's not enough here for us to pursue. The public at that point may say we're not interested and council may determine not pursue it. Schrag: So is that laid out more speciiically? Ross: In the scope of work, it's not laid out specifically. In the administration portion of the contract. In the scope of work, I grant you, it's confusing because it talks about lobbying. It talks about reformation gathering and it's a matter of how it's phased. If you look within the administration of the contract, the contractor would be meeting with the airport manager receiving the guidance and direction from the airport manager that council has put down through the city manager and if council supports that phasing that we discussed back in dune, that is what is going to occur first. Mr. Carter will be working toward doing surveys of the aviation industry, the major carriers, meeting with as high a level of management as possible to try to fred out what their Plans are aviation in Alaska and if there's opportunities for the City of Kenai to participate. Those reports will be coming back to council. They will be public reports and you know, there will be council meeting addressing them. Schrag: I guess. I still just see, you know, it says render advice, representation and assistance, provide consultation, seek support, seek support, seek support, promote, seek their assistance. So, I guess, you know, I guess I would just need to see a better, I hope that the public could see a better administrative .... l~oss: If you look at the very, excuse me, if you look at the very title of the report it's initially called an "user interest survey" and that's probably where the first part of this project is going if council buys into the phasing that we proposed is what are the carriers out there available, what are the potential users of this airport and that would be coming back in the early stages, probably within the f'n'st 90 or 180 days. The public would, I encourage you to become involved in, in that process as council looks at those reports as they come back. Schrag: I see that addressed in number nme, but I guess I see all the others that are a little bit different so, okay, you know my concerns. Williams- If you take a look at page 2 of the contract itself, paragraph 4, paragraph 4 outlines the 90-day periods in which the consultant shall commence work within 30 days following approval and every 90 days shall provide a project status report to the mrport manager and at that time the consultant will submit his proposed goals as well as the budget for the next 90 days to accomplish those goals and he'll, he shall not proceed from °ne 90-day phase to another until he's received written direction to do so. And that's all part of the administrative portion of the contract. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 22 Schrag: Okay. I hope you guys keep a mind to the thing, you, you have the man with the vision doing this and keep that in mind because you know, you know, I hope it works. We need some diversification. Williams: Thank you. Further comment? Lamboum: Yes, my name is Rebecca Lamboum and I live on Toyon Way in Kenai. decided that I should go at this point because I'm the one that's been bringing up, quite frequently lately, that this looks like a lobbying effort to me, not a survey. I'd like to pick up on something that the city manager just said. I see the point at which this departs from a survey and becomes a lobbying effort and that point is which it goes from a study to promoting something to our legislative representatives at the borough, the state, and the federal level. I think it's premature for us to be promoting any kind of a plan before we know what that plan is to those legislative bodies. Ah, I would like to propose that, as a follow-up to the city manager's suggestion or his outline for where this is intended to go, that Item 6 through 11 in that scope of services be eliminated from Mr. Carter's contract and that's something else be substituted there and that would be a true survey on the impact upon our community of an airport. I don't think it's in Mr.. Carter's abilities to do an impartial study on things like the effect of noise, air pollution, economic benefits to our community or the disadvantages. Would we have urban flight? Would people move out of the City of Kenai because of the jet noise? Should we all be buying property in Kasilof? Tape change...organizations that do this type of studies. I could recommend some within Anchorage that are consulting firms. These would be social science researchers with experience in communiW impact studies and as I said before, there are consulting fn-ms in Anchorage that would do that and with the money saved out of that $100,000 that doesn't have to be spent on lobb~ving, that money could go towards that kind of a study and it would present a more balanced view of what might be happening to the City of Kenai. I think this is very much putting the cart before the horse to think in terms of promoting something at this point before we know what we're talking about. I'm very concerned because I've lived here ten years and I plan to stay here at least until all of my children are through school but I don't what them waking up at night to the sound of airport jet noise and if they do, I will be leaving and I don't know how many others like me would do the same and what will that do to the small businesses in Kenai. Will we be a single-source industry and air cargo jets? Something that hasn't been brought up very specifically is that air cargo jet traffic tends to take place mostly at night because they tend to travel on off-peak times. They also take off at full throttle. They're very heavily loaded and as was pointed out earher tonight, I concur with earlier opinions, that a few miles to the north will not be enough to alleviate those problems. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 23 I'd also like to say that I've been receiving several phone calls the last few days from concerned citizens that can't come tonight or are uncomfortable with this sort of a forum or perhaps because of their business or their livelihood they're afraid to speak out. They're concerned about the amount of money being spent on a study like this. One in particular who called me works in the oil and gas industry and he told me, and he's fairly high up in that business, and he told me he makes no where near $100,000 and when they contract work out they don't pay $100,000 a year. I've also had several phone calls from people who are very concerned about the public process on this issue that most people in the City of Kenai don't know what sort of plan is being proposed. All we have been able to glean is from a few newspaper interviews, one with the mayor of Kenai by the Dail~ News by Jon Little in which Mayor Williams stated if this goes through, we would become the Tesoro station of the world. That doesn't spell out a plan and that's a very scary thought. So, as I said, I would ask the city council if, ff you are determined that this study has to take place in the first place, I prefer the solution that Betty Glick has put forward. To put it back in the Airport Commission. Do a lot of public hearings. Do a balanced study. But, if you are determined to vote this contract for Mr. Carter to do the study, please also consider the other kind of study I proposed which would study community impact at the same time. Thank you. Williams: Thank you very much. Just by way of comment because of our time zone and the change from the east to the west, the heaviest traffic time in Anchorage is between 10:00 a.m. in the morning and 2'00 p.m. in the afternoon. It's then when you can go there and see international carriers from all over the world pulling in there and taking off in the other direction. Please come fomvard. State your name for the record. Rozak: My name is Ron Rozak and I live at 36635 Chinulna Drive, that is south of the city limits. I'm a city engineer by profession and specifically a construction management for most of my career. In many of the projects I've worked on, I was involved in the early stages where we did feasibility studies. Part of the, I think, the problem created in this particular project or contract is maybe, a lot of us don't understand, baseline, for example. If I were to be part of a city council such as this and we had already gone through preliminary studies, reviewed the pros and cons of the $400,000 worth of reports that have already been prepared and held, held meetings or hearings where the public knew what the contents of our $400,000 worth of studies actually was and what the recommendations were and then proceed, you know, pro and con on that and come to a point where we'd say, look 10, 20 years down the road, the best thing for this city is to have a 10,500 foot runway, cater to jumbo jets, cargo jets, and put it somewhere north of town and have some idea where that was, I think Mayor Williams and this council and my neighbor, Mr. Carter, over here, would be some of the best people to put on that task. You've had a tremendous amount of success in KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 24 bringing business to this community and I know Jim has a great deal of experience in aviation matters and a lot of contacts. My concern, and at this point, I would oppose proceeding with Mr. Carter's contract right, not because it's Mr. Carter, he has the expertise to do what is in the latter part of that proposed agreement, but I don't, I guess I don't feel the feasibility or the gist of everything that's been gone, that's gone on before has been disseminated to the public. Maybe the council's aware of that, but there's been a lack of, maybe commumcation, perhaps some of use who live outside the city and don't attend the meetings and hear what took place a couple of years ago, but to me, if the city has a mission statement on where we're going from here and Mr. Carter's contract fits within the guidelines of that mission statement or call it, scope of work in my business, at some point baseline maybe refers to where are we today and then if we go this route where will we be, and if we go this route, we'll be somewhere else and how does that compare with the status quo or baseline or whatever, or however we define that. So, what I see is more of a feasibility on the lobbying or gaming or finding out ff there's money available or will the state help us or the federal government help us. And what I'm afraid of is what I've seen in the past on several projects I've been involved in, when funds become tangible or available, they're on the horizon, then there gets to be a commitment that the city has to follow up and we've already asked maybe congressional people for assistance, they start giving us some support, assign some people, now there's a possibility of money, we need to act on it. It ma.v be too late to get public input then or the public input isn't heard. I mean, we're so far along this path of progress that the comments of people are going to be shouted down. And so, I think, I agree with some of the previous speakers that now is the time to drop back, do the public input. There are a lot of resources I'm sure within the city and others, and Mr. Carter would have access to some also, that it may slow down the process around here, but put some of that information out. Have those meetings so that when you go to talk to the state, or the congressional delegation, you're speaking as representatives of the area..."we support the concept." l~ight now, I think it would be an embarrassment to get too far along, getting federal monies, they assume that everyone in the area or the majority of the people do support it, and many of us might not like that or not support the concept and have to oppose it. So, I, I guess I see things a little more specific. There is information in those reports that needs to be summarized more briefly I'm sure than what those reports probably do it and that takes some time and it's boring to read and sometimes it isn't real clear of what it's saying. And sometimes you may not even agree with what you want to do now. But that's okay. Times have changed. The report might be two years old, but the contents might be five years old and you know, the city's moving on. So, I would like to see that and I support what Betty Glick is saying. I found her to be an extremely thoughtful lady in the many years I appeared before her on projects I represented for the Borough. So, I applaud the city's interest in proceeding. I would like to drop back and educate everybody. Get the input. Then move ahead and it might be a year or two before we get to the point where we are now in commissioning a contract with someone like ,Jim Carter. And I hope he's still around and interested because I think he would be key to the success. KEN~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 25 Williams' Thank you. Any questions? Any time council may have a question for you. None? Thank you. Sonberg: My name is Debbie Sonberg. I live at 410 Cinderella. I'm sure you guys have that memorized too. And JoAnn Buzzell and I wrote this letter together and would like it to be recognized as our two voices and not just mine and just before I read it, I want you to look down your agenda and count all the itema we didn't grip about. Okay? There's a lot of them there and there's a lot of good thin§~ and there are some there that I really do known nothing about that I wouldn't have said anything. I almost, got up on a couple of them because I think a new center for the Public Health Center is, is great. I waa at the Monday clinic when giving all the measles shots and different things, helping out. And there's just no room here. So that's a great project and I'm glad that's going forward. But, back to this topic... Once again we're not as concerned with the specific issues at hand or the decision you will make on them as we are about the process leading to the decision. Clear information seems to come out after the fact rather than before the important public input stage. In this past year many residents have lost confidence in this process by losing zoning protection through the council's changes in the Land Use Table allowing nearly all commercial uses to apply for a conditional use permits. We believe that the majority of the citizens in Kenai did not understand that land use table, that the land use table item in the public announcement meant that the zoning codes were being changed. And many are still not aware of these changes or their significance. We believe the same communication problem applies to the airport issue now before us. On the current airport issue, Mayor Williams was quoted in the October 6 Clarion as. saying everyone is jumping the gun on this. We have found to our sorrow that if we don't keep on top of issues the first time, the first mention of them, it is often too late to do anything about it later on. With this airport issue we want to be assure that the citizens' interests, quality of life and fights are going to be surveyed and protected. If this study or survey includes the local citizens' interest and protection issues as part of the feasibility of this idea, we have not been able to fred it in the present wording. It all seems to be industry oriented. Those of us who are here about citizens' interests are concerned that the public is not being informed through official notices. If the Clarion on their own or prompted by concerned citizens does not print an article, the public has no idea of what is really going on or what is really happening. Today's meeting announcement regarding the airport issue only says "professional services contract, Jim Carter." How many people reading this announcement who have not attended recent meetings would be aware of that entailed? That is not informing the public. KEN~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 26 Even the Ctarion's article yesterda.v only gives the public a one-da~v notice on this issue. The council tends to depend on the Clarion's reporters to publicize issues. However, reports, reporters generally report on what has happened and that's too late for most people to have a part. Bottom line, we want clearer, up front communication on issues. We want to know we are included in the process and in the survey. Many people don't come because they are uninformed, but because they are unconcerned or apathetic. It wouldn't take that much more for you to include an explanation on non-routine issues and to offer article or press release information to the Clarion before meetings are scheduled and decisions are made. This about the fifth council meeting, I believe, that you've had regarding the airport issue and you're just now drawing a crowd. We can't be at meetings when we don't understand the meeting announcements and just as Mr. Rozak was saying, if you pursue more public input before going on with the contract, you won't get the public input if you don't have public reformation going out and quite often if there's not an article, a three or four-word line on the agenda doesn't let the public know the significance of the issue. So, I would just like to see communication firmed up a little bit. Williams: Thank you very much. There is a question from one of the council members. Councilwoman Swarner. Swarner: It's not a questions, it's a comment. packets are prepared for the media? I'd like to ask the Clerk how many Freas' One. Swarner: Is that just for the Clarion? Freas: That's the only one that's asked for one. Swarner: Okay. So there are packets available for the media and they have them before the meeting. They're able to come and pick them up on Friday just as we are and they can choose whether to print the reformation or not. Sonberg' You mean everything you have in front of you is available to them? Swarner' Yes. Freas' has. That's correct. They get a packet just with everything in it that the council Sonberg: Can you tell me when this meeting was advertised? Freas' On Monday. ~NAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 27 Sonberg: Okay. Just Monday? Usually it's twice and I was looking for it and couldn't find it other than Monday. Freas: No, sometimes they might put it in, I think it's called "Around the Pemnsula" or something like that, but that's a public announcement type of thing and we don't pay for that one and we do pay for the other one on Mondays. Sonberg: I was just curious if I missed one. Wilcox: I'm Curt Wilcox. I live on Beaver Loop Road and I'm here because I'm very concerned about our future and the quality of life. I agree with Mr. Rozak and the woman before me and Mrs. Glick. They all have great points that should be taken. There's no doubt that the quality of life will be affected by cargo jets in our neighborhood and it sounds to me like our quality of life here in Kenai is for sale and that's sort of a layman's look at it, but there's a lot of us out here that probably feel that way and I'm opposed. I think this is a premature proposal. You need to talk to the people of the community and protect our quality of life which I think is one of the duties of the council. Thank you. Schmidt: My name is Kristme Schmidt and I'm a sixteen-year resident of the City of Kenai. I'm opposed to this contract for the following reasons' first of all, lack of public notice. This contract is billed by the city as a user survey or a baseline study and instead it appears to be a lobbying contract which presupposes that the council has already approved this project, expansion of the Kenai airport, particularly as a heavy jet cargo airport without the benefit of public comment or consensus. Secondly, sole-source contracts are not in the public interest and are not the usual procedure for the City of Kenai as pointed out by the administration. This is a large dollar-value contract and should be put out to bid or use the RFP process. This is not a comment on the qualification of the proposed contractor who may well be the best qualified bidder, but rather, a request that the city follow the usual process as there is no compelling reason to do otherwise. Mrs. Glick also has a good point. Why can't the Airport Commission, this be an Airport Commission project to begin with and when contractors are necessary for expertise, they can come along later. I am also opposed to this project as stated as it will negatively impact the quality of life for city residents. These cargo planes are the noisiest planes made at this time and no matter where the city locates this runway, and there's no guarantee that the airport will be moved, these planes will destroy the peace and quiet of Kenai neighborhoods. Two things to bring to you attention: in 1991 the city did a public opinion survey of selected Kenai residents and one comment was "to keep in mind that Kenai is not a metropolis, not even close to Anchorage. Keep the small-town perspective. Don't go overboard on spending building white elephants and trying to be something we're not. Be what we are and live within our means, a small town." ~NAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 28 I believe that the majority, of people in this community are like me and the writer of this comment, here because it's a small town. This project would destroy the small town atmosphere. Second, the conventional wisdom is that by making a community a good place to live, that people in businesses will want to locate there, not the other way around -- build it and they will come projects. I have an article from recent Fresno B as I was visiting my hometown area and where city officials talk about how a city's appearance can attract more visitors and new businesses. What message is the City of Kenai sending with this project? To drive people away? Please rethink this project and table it until after you do a real study of the impact of the project on this community. Thank you. Williams' Thank you. Any questions? Someone else like to make a comment? Lipka: My name is Jill Lipka and I live a 1606 Salmo Circle in Kenai. I'm new to the area having recently moved here from the lower 48 and in my lifetime, I've often heard the words, "if you don't like it, go someplace' else." I want you to know, Kenai is my "someplace else." Kenai offers a specific quality of life that is very attractive to my husband and I. Together with our two sons, we frequently take walks on the beach and ride our bikes along the forest trails. We enjoy the natural beauty and quite here. Jets are not a part of that natural beauty. Question regarding the study: Why are we allocating funds, trying to gain support, for something we are not sure will be in the best interest of the community? Or even something that the community wants for that matter? There are people in Kenai who have no point of reference in trying to understand how loud jumbo jets are. The sound will not just hover over Kenai. It will send noise pollution all around the area. People in Soldotna who are thinking, "more Kenai, glad it's not me" should think again. They'll hear it too. If I took a recording of a jumbo jet and played it at true-life volume for say one minute, twice an hour, would my neighbors complain? It seems to me you're trading our quiet, quality of life for money. I ask you, is it worth the price? Williams' Thank you. Crawford: I'm Sammy Crawford. I live at 36615 Chinulna Drive in Kenai. Mayor Williams, members of the City of Kenai Council and City of Kenai representatives. Thank you for allowing us to speak. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 29 I'm hear to tell you I have many concerns about this project. I've lived here 30 years. I'm not a newcomer. I was married here. I raised my family here. I intend to retire and stay here. Kenai is my home. I'm not leaving, t3ut I'm very concerned about this quality of life will mean. I am so proud of Kenai for coming up with so many great ideas to improve its economic development. The fire fighting training facility, the FAA center, the Kenai Visitors & Convention Center, the Semor Citizen Center, the Challenger. l~ven our library is open on Sundays now. ~e have some wonderful things in this city but I am very concerned about this proposed expansion or the idea of expanding and having cargo planes come into Kenai. I live fight outside the City of Kenai and if you could guarantee me that the airplanes would just fly in the City. of Kenai, I wouldn't be concerned or be here. But, unfortunately, that's not the way they work. I was here 30 years too Mayor Williams, when Wien Airlines had the jet service here and it cost $7.00 one way to go to Anchorage and those days are long gone. But, anyway, thank you for listening to our concerns and I appreciate it. Williams: Thank you. Further comments. Schaan' I'm Herb Schaan and I live on Toyon Way in Kenai. Kenai resident. I attended a previous council meeting here and was able, through the kindness of one of the councilman, to get a copy of the scope of duties and I was very shocked to read that this is really a lobbing mandate at its heart. Based on a decision that apparently had been made or assumed and very clearly things were much putting the cart before the horse to repeat someone else here. We weren't completely surprised because the Anchorage paper has printed Mayor Williams' comments about making this the Tesoro station of the world again and as far as I know, the friends that I have at Tesoro are can say, I can say truly, Tesoro is a company that wants to be people-friendly in the area that it does business and I think that having these cargo jets with all of the adverse effects is definitely not people friendly and I'm not sure Tesoro would have it at its best interest to be linked with such a contentious kind of something and as falling of the nest potential that it would have for our area. What is omitted has been stated again as public input and couple council members have been very forthcoming in giving me their private time to, to discuss some issues, but I just want to say that this is not too early again, and I have to strongly disagree with Honorable Mayor, that we are maybe two years behind the time and not ahead of the time to say something about this because once a few people start an avalanche, it's very, very unlikely the people down below, no matter how united, no matter how good the arguments are, can stand, withstand such an avalanche and oncoming. And I can tell you now that the noise that goes over town, the C-130s KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 30 and during the month of August, they've been excessive, and just the C- 130s less than jets have been coming over town and the city pleads helplessness because they don't control the air space. They only control the ground. The FAA, who knows about it, continually approves people coming over our house tops again, helicopters, C-130s and others, and filled with pilots probably sensitive people who have families, doing very insensitive things over our homes. And I think to have that noise upgraded to the jet level, even though Mr. Tom Wagoner is saying that the jets now can be toned back to a point where married newly wed couple can have their evening at the end of the airstrip, I don't believe it and I think a lot of the rebuttal that you are saying does not speak to the issue. So what if it's ten years from now. Cancer today is just as bad as cancer ten years from now and I think a lot of the rebuttal about, you know, we'll £md out, or this is baseline, is there no baseline information in the quarter million book that you have lying on your, quarter million dollar book that you have l~ng on your desk. Process has been spoken to already and all of you do have your hearts in the fight place and want to do the right thing so that the quality of life can be can be better for everyone, but there's certain things that we should not put up for sale. And, I'd like to just address initial individual couple council members here in their public statements in newspaper and other places. Mr. Smalley says, "if I'm elected I will promote town meetings." And if Mr. Smalley has this on his heart, I would like to ask him now would you promote town meetings over an issue like this and that. Smalley: You bet and I think we did -- June, July, August, September and October. Schaan: Okay, and I would like to say that most of the citizenry, knows very little about the implication of what's going on and perhaps that, that process needs to go on and I think that Mr. Moore should be complimented. In the newspaper tackling the issue of the erosion of the bluffs. Very difficult fighting nature on such a scale and I would like to ask the council's support along with Mr. Moore that we tackle the erosion that goes on above the bluffs as well and the potential erosion that could, could come across in this. And I would like to compliment Councilwoman Swarner on her work on the Beautification Committee and I would like to ask her and the rest of the council to go beyond the flowers and the neatness in the town and bring it to a true sense of wellbeing day and night, air and ground. And I would like to compliment the Mayor who has a reputation of about being fiscally responsible that we seek ways of raising revenue that don't foul the nest, that don't potentially drive people away and that it is a group process that, that works for that. Soldotna has a plan for having small industry, but has a group process for the citizens to get people-friendly kind of things to be the attractive city that naturally will draw upon the things that we would like. Let planning and development be an open group and yes, a lengthy process. All of you have spoke in way or another to the apathy in this town and I think, as it's been ~NAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 31 said before, there's not a lot of apathy per se, but there is a lot of lack of information and you know the difficulW even in a small group getting the information out and the getting people to understand, to .participate in a way where they can offload their side agenda and start speaking to the issue straight and I think that process is lengthy and should not be ruined and I think it should not be taken up as the vision of one or two people because it can easily become the nightmare for many people. As good as a person may have that first vision, the nightmare is terrible for many people when it's not properly dealt with. When I was here before, couple council meetings ago, I referred to an African statement where the villagers took in a baby leopard and everybody cuddled it, this nice little kitten and the wise village elder says, "be careful, that's a leopard, no matter how cuddly warm it is. Get rid of it!" and they didn't listen, they didn't listen, and later that leopard grew up. It attacked. It killed and the village elder nearly lost his life subduing a leopard because they didn't listen to his initial warning. Little leopards become big leopards and big leopards kill. Please withhold support for this lobby effort. Supplant it with a more balanced study if that's necessary now. Please preserve the equality of our town. In many ways now and ten years from now and research alternatives and I would just like to remind, little leopards become big leopards and big leopards kill. Williams: Thank you. Are there any questions from council? Thank you Mr. Schaan. Further comment. That will be a tough one to follow. Rodes- My name is, do you hear me okay? My name is Janice Rodes. I live at 207 Birch Street and yes, I did know I live only two blocks from the airport runwa~v when I moved in. I always said kind of smugly, I never hear the planes if the door and the windows are closed. I don't think I have any reason to be in favor cargo jets. I might change my mind. I don't have any reason to speak against Mr. Carter. I was impressed with his resume, but I was surprised and then I was distressed with the way that it was handled and I, I hope that you'll consider the procedures that have been described by other people. I do want to address a concern that I have that's present and I'm quite sure that it would be in the future, would be more serious, and that's aircraft noise and it may be that I'm rather sensitive to that because I was told I lost most of my hearing because when I was a young woman I worked in an aircraft factory and we had to walk past the jet test stands. I know more now than I did then, obviously. But, anyway, the Kenai Municipal Airport Master Plan, the one that the Mayor has there, and the professional services contract uses the term "airport expansion" and the city manager's transmittal memo speaks to location, relocation of the present airport. That left me a little bit confused, but the Master Plan describes changes of runways in the future is reducing noise impacts. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 32 Well, I live just outside the area that the plan describes as affected by the aircraft noise exposure level and that these noise measurements were made in 1995 and in the past several months, I've noticed loud noise mainly in connection with large planes fl.ving low. I believe they're also closer than where the flight plan is supposed to cross our street and I've discussed this with various people that I thought would be helpful but this is a problem that I hope that no matter what happens here tonight, I hope the council will, will be mindful of and will address in the future. I have a couple of, several questions. Some of them you may not be able to answer tonight. Does Kenai have a noise ordinance? W, illiams: We don't have a noise ordinance per se. We have a, what do you call it, it s a, we have some kind of ordinance that takes care of community problems of that sort. A nuisance ordinance but not specifically a noise ordinance, I don't think. Rodes' Do you know how realistic the noise level criteria is in the plan that you've got there? Like I said, it dates to 95 but I wasn't able to find anybody who could tell me what 65 DB would be in. What that was in terms of you know, loud radio, someone talking to you across the room. And that was the noise level that they said was minimally . That's one I wouldn't expect you to be able to answer that . Are the planes fl.ving legal flight paths over the residential areas at present? That's one that you probably, the answer I got from the FAA was, "well of course they are." Do we have local control over what planes land or practice touch and go at the Kenai Airport? Williams' The uniqueness of a public airport of this type is that anyone may use it. There's a, you know, airports maintain a very specific position within the realm of transportation. It would not be in the best interest of the public or the City of Kenai or anyone else to limit the use of an airport, especially if it were in an emergency situation. We've had planes as large as 747s land here. Granted, we don't want it to happen. It has. We've had great difficulty in that respect. We've had lots of 737s land even to the point when Wien would find themselves blocked out of Anchorage, they'd park every incoming bird across Alaska fight out here on the ramp. We've had seven or eight of them at one time parked here. During the volcanic eruption, while MarkAir was still in business, most of his planes parked here. We, in no way, would restrict the use of this airport under any circumstances of that nature. The military now, is a different story. Rodes' Yeah, the reason that I ask is that I, I almost caused because I stood and watched for a couple of that the planes that I was objecting to the noise from, were practicing touch and goes at the airport because they were, unless they were flying an awful lot of planes then. I didn't go over and look to see what they were .... Are we getting fair payment for use of the airport? KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 33 Williams: The military airplanes that you're referring to have been quite active down here for the past couple or three weeks and I cannot anticipate or reason what they're ideas are with regard to their practicing here except that it's less crowded airspace and they prefer to come down here. They've had both the AWACS pla.ne, the C-130s and I believe I saw a C-135 in and both Black Hawks that belong to the air rescue group and they regularly come here. And, you know, I f'md that to be a very protective cover for me as a citizen with regard to life safety and public issues. I was personally responsible in working with Senator Stevens to insure that the air rescue wing of the Alaska Air National Guard was not only created, but funded and placed into position to help people of this state. They have two C-130s. The services of a KC- 135 out of Eielson and two Black Hawk helicopters and I'll always consider that to be one of the greatest partnerships with our congressional delegation that I was fortunate to work in. So, with those boys, I'll let them land here any time they want. Rodes: Well my objection was less to their land and even practicing touch and goes as it was that the spot that they fly over Birch Street is about a block and one-half from where I live and I couldn't understand why they couldn't fly out toward the river. Now there maybe a perfectly good reason that I would suspect. Williams' I was just noticing from the Airport Master Plan that your street is beyond the perimeter of the airport by about 1300, let's see, 6-60, about: 1300 feet and there may be some correctable concerns with regard with the pattern they're flying because that is their downwind leg. But those are something that you're going to have to discuss with the FAA because they control the airspace. Rodes' Well, my next question I had down here, everybody else is asking. Will the expansion or relocation of the airport be discussed in the community as each step of process. I think this would be good .... inaudible .... I do have one other question and then I'll sit down. Is the Airport Master Plan the guiding document on the development of the Kenai Airport. Is that the plan? Williams- Well, let me say and I think I speak for the council. The Airport Master Plan that we have here is a continuing development. It's a continuing document. We'll have it done again sometime in the near future and it'll cost us another $250,000. But the only way that we can continue to develop the airport, develop commerce, and develop our transportation system and still remain in good graces with the FAA with regard to revenues that we receive from them, is to continue to review our operations and to continue to review our process and I think that's what we'll continue to do and I believe we all agree that the City of Kenai, I personally believe, would not have the quality of life today that we have if it weren't for the airport. There's just not the revenue-producing businesses here to support this community without being a center for transportation and a center for justice and a center for state offices. That's our main, that is our main thrust in the economy. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 34 We don't have enough retail business or enough taxable property, to do anything in that nature. So, I think, if we were to see the airport go away, you'd certainly see a lot of people go away as well. So... Rodes: Thank you. Williams: Further questions. Further comments. Poynor: Good evening. My name is Alan Poynor and I live at 509 Ash Avenue in Kenai and I just...perhaps I'm a little slow on the uptake here Mayor, but you've got $500,000 worth of study sitting in front of you, if I understood what was said earlier this evening, and none of those $500,000 addressed this particular point at all? Williams: Yes. Let me, let me say that this is just one of the studies that we've had. In the last municipal Airport Master Plan it addressed the issue of longer runways and we have struggled with the issue of longer runways for as long as I've been around...well at first we started struggling with the issue of paving the runways back when Jim and I were just kids, you weren't even around. You were still over in Tok at the time (speaking to City Manager Ross), So that, that struggle we overcame. But the study called for, I believe expansion to 10,500 feet. In looking at that expansion, a lot of concerns that we're talking about here today were voiced and a lot of them were talked about and I'm talking about going over the last fifteen, twenty years. The big problem in expanding the runway to 10,500 feet is that we're somewhat blocked by property ownership to the north, because by moving it out to the, right to the very edge we would be encroaching airspace-wise on privately held lands. Others are that all of the avionics -- the instrument landing systems and all that. is located on the north end rather than on the south and the expense of moving the avionics and, and causing all of that ILS system to be. relocated and recalibrated and eve .rythmg, probably cost more than what it would cost to pave the runway to get out there. But, be that as it may, it was always considered that at some point in time, we would do that. I mean, that was everybody's conclusion. One day we're going to expand this airport. We're going to take in jets and we're gore§ to have jet service here and that's the way it's going to be. With the second document, the one we now have before us,-. after much public comment and I must say that I'm sorry that some of you missed those meetings because they did produce a tremendous amount of data and information over a long period of time, I have two members of the Airport Commission here who might speak to just how long it took for that process. They determined that the airport runway should be about 8,500 feet instead of 10,000. Well, that kind of flew in the face of what we had proposed and it was partly because we began to believe that maybe we didn't need a 10,500 runway. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 35 Well, after that part came to fight, we revisited the document after it was done, and many of us came away with the question as to, well, what happened to the 10,000 foot runway that we had originally. Why was it deleted. Is there any market out there? Is there truly no market in which we can enter and commercialize this airport that would require 10,000 feet. I think, from that was bom the idea of let's take a look at this whole. What, where, why, how, who and we'H go out there and we'll see what kind of a market there really is for this whole thing. Knowing full well that if something like that occurred, a major airport, we may surely have to move it all the way away from town. And as I made the comment earlier today, you know, fighting on both sides of the issue, close the airport, don't close the airport, stop the traffic, don't stop the traffic, sue the airport for more land, don't sue the airport, has been going on for years here and we we're going to come to some kind of answers here pretty soon. Poynor: Okay. Let's go ahead and clarify something. I deal with words frequently and, is it "may" or "surely" that we're going to have to move the airport. What you're saying is that the studies indicate we can't do it. We can't do a 10-5 runway right here and there are restrictions on large aircraft that are going to require probably greater than 10,500 feet if we're talking about heavy cargo aircraft TAPE CHANGE... to me is a $100,000 crap shoot that we can pick up part of the $200 Billion that A1 Gore's talldng about. And, and, I get a little fired up... Williams: That's all right...Just a comment to say that airports are very expensive and we all know that. All you have to do is look around, around the country... Poynor: So, before, before we go running off lobbying for support because I see a good portion of this proposal is actually lobbying effort -- seek Kenai Peninsula Borough wide support, seek support for the Kenai Municipal Airport, seek support from the Alaska Delegation. Seek their assistance with the project. Seek, seek, seek. Don't you think we ought to figure out whether or not it's needed and whether or not we have the ability to put it into play before we start seeking? If this is a baseline, truly a baseline study, I can give you your baseline. As it stands right now, we cannot do it. We don't have the land to build a facility that we can and from what I've heard this evening, you don't have the public support to put it into play. Williams' problem. Thank you. I don't know the answer to those questions. I do not know the answer to those questions. That's, that's the Poynor' And, Mr. Carter is definitely qualified and I don't mean to be disparaging, but you know, your philosophy, and that of the council, although admirable for your fiscal responsibility, the line was laid out earlier this evening. The whole tact of what the council and what this motivating, the motivating force behind this particular piece of work is, they're putting out $245 Million for roads. Let's get a piece of it. I don't want to subsidize $100,000 crap shoot and that's what this is. Thank you. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 36 Williams: Thank you. I might also advise you that this particular "crap shoot" as you call it, is not being paid for by the General Fund of the City of Kenai. It's being paid for from the Airport Revenue Fund. No, it's not taxpayers' money. It's airport revenue fund money that the taxpayers have a responsibility m. Much of the money that we get in the airport here again, like the federal highway system, comes to us in the form of federal grants, has nothing to dO with the earning capabilities that we here in the city have with the airport or that the passengers here or users of the airport pay for. Let me say that ff we were to depend upon our own devices with regards to the creation and the advancement and development of that airport, that airport would still be a gravel runway out there. Probably with steel landing mats on it. That's something, I sometimes think it's really tough to clearly understand the role, the tremendous role that the state and federal government has in our very existence here. Our very. existence with regard to municipal assistance and revenue sharing, with regards to some of the major projects that we've had, the airport and all of that. Where our money actually comes from. It doesn't come from the taxpayers of the City of Kenai. I have a reputation of being the spendy-est mayor we've ever had here and yet virtually none of the money in comparison is a percentage of our dollars came from the City of Kenai. They came from other places. They weren't our dollars. Millions of dollars have come into the City of Kenai that the taxpayers could have never afforded in any way, shape or form. So... Poynor (from the audience)' But Your Honor, the point I'm getting at is there's no reason, even if it isn't coming directly from our pocket. There's no reason, if you'll pardon the expression, "to piss it away." That is why we are in the fiscal responsibility and the problems that we'Ve got in this country fight now is everybody says, ifs somebody else's money. Williams' All fight. Are there any questions from council with regard to any of the comments that have been made? Yes. Please come forward. Christian: Mike Christian ah, he gets excited doesn't he...I live at 613 Maple and I've addressed the question of airport noise and the airport and the $100,000 that could have purchased a piece of land that would protect some of our noise pollution. But, this, you brought up how important this airport is to the city. The city wouldn't be the same without this airport and yet you're talking about building a new airport somewhere else which will dram away this very big cash cow that we have. That doesn't make sense to me. If this is a good airport and this is what's keeping Kenai Kenai, let's make this airport work and I don't think these cargo jets are to the benefit of our community or our economic community. Passenger traffic? Yes. That's a great economic boom. Cargo traffic? All I see there is negatives. Noise and pollution and quality of life that goes down the tubes. We also have in this community, a bedroom community as you all know. We have a lot of commuter traffic. People going to the North Slope and other places. I don't think that this w/Il bring more of that in here. I think that that airport and that noise and that mess would drive that away. I think you're going to see a loss of population and not a KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 37 benefit. That's basically everything else I would agree with negatively, this one I thought needed to be pointed out. Thank you. Williams- Thank you. Ail fight. We've been at it for about an hour and half now. Are there any comments that we haven't heard. Something that really needs to be said. Anybody that feels they have a desire to address the council on this particular issue. Yes? Excuse me, just a minute. We have a member of the Airport Commission. Thibodeau' Yeah, I'm Tom Thibodeau. I'm chairman of the Airport Commission and I've, we've come here tonight, myself and couple Airport Commission members, just to kind of hear what's going on and we sure appreciate the input that we've got. As Mr. Mayor's said, we did put on, or got the Airport, the original Airport Master Plan, we had several meetings on that. As a matter of fact, it went over quite a period of time and, and we appreciated any input that we got at that time and it went into the Plan. I think what we need to do in this, and I think the part that really wasn't emphasized in the plan is that the initial part of the contract that we're talking about here, as the City Manager said, is to look at the feasibility and possibly that needs to be really worded and emphasized a little bit more in there. And on that basis, it's going to go forward into what the last part is the promotional part. And that really is the emphasis that that, that we need to place on this. It's, it's in there. That's what the contract was about. And that's where we want to go with it. But it needs to be possibly worded a little more directly and I think, that's where, you know as the Airport Commission, need to do possibly. I'd like to have the city council's recommendation on that as whether they want to put that back, we'd like to possibly take that and emphasize that part of it a little more directly. And that's what I have to say on it. I think we've gained a lot here tonight and I think the project itself, the study, you know, as been pointed out, our airport is right in the center of our town and we can't grow, you know. And maybe the thing to do is to look at the feasibility of moving it out. We've had a lot of people that have come to the Airport Commission and talked talked to use about noise pollution and airport, you know airplanes flying directly over their house and is this, you know, a good flight plan. The reality of it is, there are certain altitudes that you can fly at, but the pilot has to be able to choose a safe route to the airport and that's his decision pretty much to make. As long as he's not endangering anybody. If the airport did move out, it would answer a lot of the questions that we've had here for the Airport Commission at different times in regards to, you know, the noise. It would be away from us. It would certainly be a lot further away from us than it is right, now. And it als_o would leave room for expansion within the city here as the city limits are now. It would think it would be a city airport or city controlled airport, it would just be further away than it is now. Which would be a boom to us. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 38 I think what everybody's trying to do is to do what's best for the city and we appreciate that. So, I think the emphasis has to be possibly, as the city manager says, various reporting points in the contract and maybe that's spelled out a little more clearly that the first portion of it isn't feasibility . In order to study the feasibility of this thing, you have to have access to various levels within the airport community, the aviation community, the airlines. And, it really depends on who you send there as to whether you're going to get a true answer. You know, get some real thought into it. Get to the right level where decisions can be made and I think in that case Mr. Carter's an excellent one to do that. He has those connections to fred out what we want. Yes, I think he'd like to see this project go forward. I think there's a lot of people that would like to see the airport be put in a position where it doesn't make the noise that it does now, possibly and a lot of those complaints are handled. Also, that the economic development in this community gets to expand because of any, whether, whether it be cargo jets or whether it be just some other little form of, you know, the aviation community that we might find out about. We need to study it to fred out and that's what this is about. Voice from audience: We keep hearing this move the airport a couple of miles to the north. Just what land are talking about? Is it private land? Is this city lands? I've heard Salamatof land. Where is it specifically and how far north and when should Niskiski residents be in this process. Or North Kenai... Thibodeau: Well, I'm not really sure and that too would come out of it. I'm not sure that you're talking about north towards North Kenai. Possibly a little ways that way. My thoughts would be more towards Anchorage. There is Moose Range out there. Those things would have to be dealt with as to how far you could go, you know. Voice' So, the Moose Range is a possibility in this plan, is that what you're ... Thibodeau' Well, that would be a pretty big move, but anything's a possibility. Williams' Let me say that none of know the answers to any of those questions and that's part of why we wanted to do the study. There are a variety of lands out there that are owned by federal, state, borough, city and private interests and there are, you know, there's thousands of acres. There's 5,600 acres that lie between the Moose Range and the Wildwood Air Station. You know, that might be acceptable. On the other hand, there soils may be so bad we may never need, be able to build it but we don't know the answer to those questions. Voice: Then why would we be taltdng about promoting it now... Thibodeau' The emphasis in the contract as it's written right now seems to be on promotion and, and at some point it may come to that, but, but that might be a little premature. That, that's what the Airport Commission would like to take a look at. Voice: So this contract needs to go back to the Airport Commission... KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 39 Thibodeau: I think that's the point that I'd like to request. Williams' Thank you. Thank you. Questions from council. Ail right, Mr. Carter, you were going to address the group. Carter: Thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the council, ladies and gentlemen of the audience. I, I agree with Tom also about it going back to the Airport Commission. They meet tomorrow night. I think that would be a golden opportunity to take a.no~er fresh look at it and see ff changes need to be made to take into considerations of what the citizens have said here this evening. I'm sorry that a lot of you was not present when I first made the presentation to the city and to the Airport Commission about this project. We talk about a vision. There's a lot of things that are attached to that. Some of you may recall that at one time going into Juneau, Alaska Airlines crashed and a hundred-and-some people died, followed by an Army aircraft with the commanding general and his staff crashed and were killed and yet there was equipment on the shelf that could have been installed that could maybe have prevented that but they were waiting for newer equipment that was on the production line. Remember now that I said, may have prevented that. Now we talk about what°s happening in Anchorage and our surrounding area. The Mayor mentioned that we already had a disaster here -- 747 coming from Tokyo to Anchorage. He encountered more head winds than he expected. He got to Anchorage. Anchorage and Elmendorf were closed. He started to Fairbanks. Ice fog set m. He came back to Anchorage and finally he said, "hell, it's decision time" and he came into Kenai. Now this runway is stressed for 250,000 pounds. 747 empty weighs 300,000 pounds. Now he had to put it down. Fortunately, he had very little fuel and had cargo and not people. There was damage. In fact, taking off he blew out most of the lights on the runway and caused damage. This runway is not suited for that kind of aircraft. More and more and more aircraft operating into Elmen...or Anchorage are 747s and DC-10s. Now, my FAA experience has seen 747s take off from Anchorage loaded with people, have an emergency, cuts out engine number two, furst thing you know he has to cut out number one, he's dropping 150,000 pounds of fuel out in the Inlet and trying to get back into Anchorage. Mark my word. Mark my word that with the traffic that is happening in Anchorage, one of these days that's going to happen and they're going to be closed. Anchorage and Elmendorf are going to close in behind them and that guy has to 'go someplace. It's not unusual to have satellite airports backing up major airports. Boeing Field does it for SeaTac. Even the Air Force Base in Phoenix backs up the Phoenix Airport in case of emergencies. It's not unusual. Kenai is absolutely one of the best places to have a satellite airport to back up Anchorage. To say we don't care, I know KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 40 everyone of you care. But we can't afford a 747 coming in here with 300 people on board and hope that this runway can take care of it. I say, it's a disaster. It's a disaster. Now, that's only, you know, we can thumb our nose to that and say, "ah, that will never happen." But, it will, it will happen sometime someday. And so that was some of the thought that has gone into this. It isn't to purposely cause hard feelings among people and then of course, if you build a runway, then it's got to become profitable and so you try to see what other traffic that can use it. Anyhow, it's a, you know, I, I know you really don't care to hear that tonight, but those are the things that area out there and they, they are very important. And I could go in and talk to you about a lot of other things. Anchorage is running out of space. It's public knowledge that in ten years they will have run out of land at Anchorage International Airport. Some other place has got to help. Got to help take care of that and so, like I said, I could tell you just scads of stuff, but you, know, that's just a few things in a nut shell. And I'm talking about, I've been in aviation going on 52 years in this state and I watch things happen, watch them grow and it's not always a pretty picture. Williams: Thank you Mr. Carter. All right if we have no further comment, then I'll bring this back to the city council. We do have a motion on the floor to approve the contract as is. There's room for discussion of the council at this point in time. Possibly some amendments or actions. END OF VERBATIM. Smalley stated he was very glad so many people came to the council meeting and stated their concerns. He added, this subject had been discussed by council since June and sometimes it takes some time for people to get involved. Smalley added, he believed that the council, Carter and the citizens have the same goal -- to do what is in the best interest of the city. He continued, there are different routes to reach the goal and this is a good starting point to find a solution amicable to all. Smalley stated he too had concerns about noise, air quality, visual impact, property values, quality of life, etc. MOTION TO AMEND: Councilman Smalley MOVED to amend the motion to return this agreement back to the Airport Commission for review (assuming Mr. Carter will be at the Airport Commission). Williams noted the discussion could not take place at that meeting due to public notice. The item could be included on the November agenda. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING ,MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1998 PAGE 41 Councilwoman Swarner SECONDED the mot/on. Bannock stated he deeply appreciated the fact that the room was full of citizens. He added, he didn't agree with many of the concerns stated, but enjoyed the fact they were at the meeting. Bannock continued he was dismayed and concerned regarding comments made of the perceived lack of public process that this issue has gone through. He added, the contract has been debated for the majority of the calendar year. Bannock continued, comments were made there were no articles about the discussion or topic in the newspaper. He suggested the people call the newspaper and note their concerns to them or attend the council meetings on a regular basis. Bannock noted, the council meeting agendas are published in the paper, the meetings are held on the same days every month and the agenda is posted at City hall. He urged the people to not complain there was lack of public process, but attend the meetings. An unidentified woman in the back of the room stated she had contacted the City Clerk several years ago with a question about the agenda and was told the information on the agenda was confusing. She added, she would like more information included in what is published in the paper. Smalley suggested that if someone has a question regarding a topic listed on an agenda, to call City Hall and if they did not get the information they wanted, to call a council member. Swamer noted the agenda also includes the city's home page and access to the Intemet can be had at the library if the Intemet is not available to someone at home. Swarner also thanked the members of the Airport Comrmssion for their work on the Master Plan. Moore suggested the council and administration make a conscious effort to include additional words on the published agenda to better reform the public. Measles requested clarification as to when the item would be again before the Airport Commission. He noted, if the discussion does not take place until the Airport Commission's November meeting (November 121, it wouldn't be back before council before the second meeting in November or the fh'st meeting in December. Ross stated he didn't think there was any reason to have a special meeting of the Airport Commission in this regard. The delay would allow minutes of this meeting to be completed, etc. Ross added, he would be out of town October 15 through 26 and would prefer the item go before the Airport Commission at their November meeting. Bannock noted, he asked Thibodeau to informally poll his comrmssion members to see if they felt the issue should be returned to them for further review. Thibodeau answered, at that time they asked copies of some information. Bannock asked Thibodeau if he saw a need for the issue to return to the commission for further review. Thibodeau answered, not at that time, but after receiving a copy of the CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 t~.t-~ 1992 M emoranClum Date: To' From: October 30, 1998 Mayor and City Council Richard A. Ross, City Manager ~ Airport Development- Consultant Services The proposed consultant services contract for airport development is included for your information only. The document is also available to the public for their information prior to its discussion at the Airport Commission meeting. The Airport Commission will review the proposed contract at their November 12t~ meeting. The Council will formally receive the proposed contract with comments from the Airport Commission at their November 18t~ meeting. The body of the contract has had some minor revisions for purposes of clarity. The Scope of Services has had a major rewrite to reflect the project phrasing as described at the June 3~a Council meeting. This re- write should also address many of the concerns expressed in public testimony at the October 7t~ Council meeting. RAR/kh PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA and JAMES E. CARTER, SR. for PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES AT THE KENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FOR THE PROJECT CALLED AIRPORT EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT--A USER INTEREST SURVEY THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1998, by and between the CITY OF KENAI, Alaska ("City") and JAMES E. CARTER, SR. ("Consultant"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining professional services to provide professional consulting at the Kenai Municipal Airport for the project called Airport Expansion and Development--A User Interest Survey ("Project"), and the Consultant is willing to perform such services within the time limits hereinafter specified; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual covenants agreements herein set forth, the City and the Consultant do mutually agree as follows' and I. RETAINER City does hereby retain the Consultant to perform the professional services herein specified, and the Consultant does hereby agree to perform said professional services within the time limits and as herein specified. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultam shall fully and completely perform the services described in this Agreement and in Attachment A. No changes in the Scope of Services or amendments to the Agreement shall be made without prior written approval of the City. Upon conclusion of the Project, all submitted plans and documents prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the City. III. TERM The term of the Agreement shall be one (1) year from the date of signing. AGREEMENT- Page 1 of 6 CONSULTANT CITY IV. TIME OF PERFORMANCE Consulmm shall commence work within thirty (30) days following approval of this agreement and City. authorization to proceed. Subsequem to signing of the contract and prior to notice to proceed, the Consultant will submit a proposed scope of work for the first 90-day period. At each subsequent 90-day period, Consultant will provide a project stares report for the previous 90-day period, as well as a proposed scope of work and budget for the next 90-day period. Consultant shall not proceed to the next 90-day work period until the documents previously described have been submitted to the Airport Manager. Travel not within the scope of work for the current 90-day period, if not specifically approved in the budget, must be approved by the Airport Manager. Ve CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION The City will work cooperatively with the Consultant through the Airport Manager's office. The Airport Manager will be the contract administrator and the contact for any direction sought by the Consultant or received by the Consultant from the City. VI. COMPENSATION City shall pay Consultant not more than ONE HUND~D THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000) to provide said professional services for the Project. The amount includes all out-of-pocket expenses, including but not limited to document preparation, airline travel, car rental, lodging, meals, telephone, copying and delivery. Consultant agrees to properly complete the project in its entirety with a cost to the City not to exceed $100,000. Consultant shall bill for services at an hourly rate of EIGHTY DOLLARS ($80.00) inclusive of administrative assistance. Each monthly billing from the Consultant will be accompanied with an itemized list of expenditures. Monthly billings are subject to review and approval by the Airport Manager and Finance Director. VII. METHOD OF PAYMENT Consultant shall be paid monthly no later than fifteen (15) days following receipt and approval by City of Consultant's monthly invoice. Consultant's monthly payment shall be a sum calculated on the basis of work completed during each month. AGREEMENT- Page 2 of 6 CONSULTANT CrlT VIII. TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT The parties may terminate this Agreement at any time by mutual agreement in writing. City may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten days before the effective date of termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement with cause by giving written notice to City of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten (10) days before the effective date of termination. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by the Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become its property; and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. IX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant is an independent contractor, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making such contractor an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing such Contractor to create or assume any obligation or liability for or on behalf of City. Further, Consultant assumes all rights, obligations and liabilities applicable, to it, as such independent contractor, hereunder. X® INSURANCE The Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect him and the City as a named additional insured from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage. The Consultant shall also secure and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance. The minimum limits of coverage shall be: (A) Alaska Worker's Compensation, and (B) Employer's Liability Insurance (A) Statutory (B) $500,000 per occurrence Comprehensive General Liability and Auto Liability with included Operations, Contractual Liability, and Owned, Hired, and Non-owned Vehicles $500,000 Combined Single Limit The Consultant shall secure certificate of insurance which shall be filed with this Agreement as an attachment and this certificate shall provide for not less than thirty AGREEMENT- Page 3 of 6 CONSULTANT CITY days (30) written notice to the City of cancellation or substantial change in policy conditions or coverage. XI. NOTICES Any notices between City and Consultant provided for herein shall be given in writing and by personal delivery or by prepaid first-class registered or certified mail addressed as follows: Steve Atha, Airport Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611-7794 James E. Carter, Sr. Consultant Kenai, AK 99611 RELEASE OF PROJECT MATERIALS Consultant shall not permit the publication, release or other distribution of reports. data, conclusions or other Project materials without prior written approval of the City, unless already publicly available. XIII. COPYRIGHT XIV. No repons, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant. IDENTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS All reports, maps, and other documents completed as part of this Agreement, other than documents exclusively for internal use by the City, shall carry the applicable notation on the front cover or on a title page (or, in the case of maps, in the same block) containing the name of the City, the month and year the document was prepared, who prepared the document, and Kenai Municipal Airport. XVe OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS Ae Compliance o Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. . City and the FAA, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant which are directly pertinent to the Project for the AGREEMENT- Page 4 of 6 CON~T~ CITY purposes of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. City requires Consultant to maintain all required records for three (3) years after City makes f'mal payment and all other pending matters are closed. o Sanctions for Noncompliance' In the event of Consultant's noncompliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City shall impose such contract sanctions as it may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: ne Withholding of payments to Consultant under the Agreement until Consultant complies: and/or bo Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract in whole or in part. Be Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Assurances: o Policy' It is the policy of the City. and the DOT that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with the Federal funds under this Agreement. Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this Agreement. o DBE Obligation: Consultant agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this Agreement. In this regard, all subcontractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to complete for and perform contracts. Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis or race. color, national origin, age, handicap, sex, or religion in the award and pertbrmance of DOT assisted contracts. C. Lobbying If registering with the Alaska Public Offices Commission is required, Consultant shall register properly and make all necessary reports in a timely manner to the proper authorities. XVI. INTEGRATION This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by the City Manager and Consultant. AGREEMENT- Page 5 of 6 CONSIX~TANT CITY IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused the Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the day and year fin:st above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF KENAI James E. Carter, Sr. Richard A. Ross, City Manager Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: (typed name) (typed name) Approved by City Attorney Approved by Finance AGREEMENT- Page 6 of 6 CON~T~ CITY Scope of Services Consultant will be responsible for, but not limited to, the described Scope of Services. These services are rendered in two distinct phases. In the first phase, the Consultant will be engaged in the following activities. o Survey the upper level management of air carriers (both domestic and international) and other appropriate sources to ascertain aviation industry plans for the future of aviation in Alaska. Ascertain from the State of Alaska and the aviation industry the capabilities, present and planned, of the Anchorage and Fairbanks airports to meet the future needs and demands of the industry. . Provide assessments of development opportunities that may or may not justify the relocation of an expanded Kenai Municipal Airport. . Provide 90-day stares reports, and other documents prepared for the City to the Airport Manager. Participate in public meetings of the Airport Commission and City Council in discussion of 90-day status reports and proposed scopes of work and budgets for subsequent 90-day periods. After review of information received the Kenai City Council may determine to proceed with the study. Should the Kenai City Council make this determination, the consultant would be engaged in providing the following additional types of services. o Develop plans and strategies for obtaining funds necessary for site analysis for suitability of potential sites, and environmental assessment studies. o Seek support of State and local governments in receiving their endorsement for acquisition of necessary funding. 7. Arrange meetings between air carrier executives, State officials, and our congressional delegation in support of funding for site analysis and environmental studies of potential sites. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT JAMES E. CARTER. SR. ATTACHMENT A Page I of 1 Attachment B Scope of Services for a Community Impact Study · The purpose of the study is to ascertain the effects on the communit)..' of Kenai of an expanded airport facility capable of handling jumbo jets. - · Professional services would be required and the contract wouldr~,o through the re_oular~ _RFP process required by the city of Kenai to insure impartialits,'. The study xvould include existing research in order to assess the following: 1. The impact of air pollution on the communirs.' of Kenai resulting from frequent take-o-.:Ss anc landings of jumbo jets. 2. The general health effects on populations living near busy' jumbo jet airports. (i.e. increases in cancers, heart disease, respiratory., illnesses, mortalit3.' rates and mental illnesses. } 3. The impact of chronic exposure to airport noise on nearby populations, especially chi' dren. (.i.e. sleep deprivation, potential increases in incidence of ADD, high blood pressure, lov,'er standardized test scores, stress hormone responses). 4. The impact of contaminated water runoff from the airport on surface and ground xvate:'. 5. Impact on population demographics and potential relocation of the current Kenai pop'.:iatior_ living in neighborhoods near the proposed expanded or relocated airport. 6. Impact on the healthy cultural functionino= of neiehborhood,, communities near the airrort.. 7. Impact on property values and a potential tax revenue decline. 8. Safety of citizens and homes near an airport that may be used for emergency landings 9. The impact of potential changes in population demographics on existing small businesses ir, the Kenai community. 10. The impact of an air cargo facility..~ on tourism. 11. Legal implications and potential lawsuits by residents living near an expanded airpo:-t. 12. Impact on cultural and educational facilities near 'the airport such as churches and schools. 13. Impact on wildlife, habitat, and xvetlands near the proposed airport CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ 1992 Date Dear Kenai Resident: Your name has been selected by a random sampling of City of Kenai voters to participate in a public opinion poll. The poll is designed to obtain the opinions of voters on a variety of subjects. In order for the poll to be accurate, it is important that we receive your response. It is also important that you, the addressee, be the one that fills it out. You will find enclosed a stamped, addressed envelope to return your completed questionnaire. Please return the questionnaire within 15 days of receipt. Your questionnaire will remain anonymous. The objective of the poll is to give insight to the Kenai City Council and Administration as to what citizens think are the City's strengths and weaknesses. Thank you for participating in this process. Sincerely, CITY OF KENAI Richard A. Ross City Manager Enclosure RAR/kh Questionnaire It is important for local government to have as much citizen input as possible regarding Kenai's operation. You have been selected at random to participate in this public opinion poll. We encourage you to fill out the questionnaire and remm it in the enclosed stamped, addressed envelope. The results of this survey will be made public upon completion. . ,, How long have you lived in Kenai? You are in which of the following age brackets? (a) 18 - 30 (c) 41 - 50 (e) 61-70 (b) 31 - 40 (d) 51 - 60 (f) Over 70 3. Do you have children living with you? (a) Yes (b) , , , , , , No If you have children living with you, how many do you have? On a comparison with other cities in Alaska, how do you rate Kenai as a place to live and/or raise children? (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Fair (d) Poor Do you own a home in Kenai? (a) Yes (b) No If renting, do you plan to purchase a home in the City of Kenai in the next five years? (a) Yes (b) .. No (c) Don't know Do you plan to move in the next two years? (a) ~ Yes (b) . No (c) Don't know If yes, would that be to another location in Alaska? (a) Yes (b) No (c) Don't know City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 1 of 7 10. Any specific reason for moving in the near future? 11. Do you plan to live in the City of Kenai during retirement? (a) ... Yes (b) No (c) Don't know 12. Are there pets such as dogs or cats in your household? (a) Yes (b) No 13. If your answer is yes, what kind and how many of each? (a) Dogs (b) Cats (c) Other 14. In your opinion, how well is the City functioning on behalf of the citizens of the City of Kenai? (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Fair (d) Poor 15. If you had to name one City service for which more of your tax dollars should be spent, which would it be? (a) (b) None 16. If you had to name one City service for which too many of your tax dollars are spent, which would it be? (a) (b) None City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 2 of 7 17. For the following services, do you think that the City of Kenai should spend more, less, or about the same as it is spending now? More Less Same Senior Citizens Services Emergency Medical Services Fire Police Library Airport Water Sewer Animal Control Parks & Recreation Boat Ramp & Dock Street Maintenance Street Lighting Visitor & Cultural Facility Beautification 18. 19. 20. If you indicated that the City should be spending more for one or more of the above services, which would you consider to be a fair means of obtaining the necessary revenue? (a) (b) (c) , (d) Increase sales tax Increase property tax mill levy User fees Do not increase taxes or fees; reduce other expenditures Have you, or anyone you know, been restricted from any City program,' activity, service or facility because of a disability? (a) Yes (b) No If yes, please elaborate. 21. Have you contacted the City in the last 12 months with a citizen' (a) Yes (b) No s request? City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 3 of 7 22. If the answer to Question No. 21 was yes, were you satisfied with the results? 23. (a) Yes (b) No Have you used any of the parks or recreation facilities in the last months? 12 24. (a) Yes (b) .......No If your answer to question No. 23 was yes, indicate by a check mark which of the following parks and recreation facilities you have used in the last 12 months. 25. 26. (a) Softball Fields (h) Nordic Ski Trails (b) ~Little League Fields (i) Tent Campground (c) Municipal Park (j) Recreation Center (d) Cunningham Park (k) Boat Ramp (e) Bernie Huss Memorial Park (1) Playgrounds (f) .... Beaver Creek Park (m) Footpaths (g) Leif Hansen Park (n) Other Have you or a member of your family used the Kenai Library in the past twelve months? ~ Yes No If you answered yes to Question #25, what is the age (or ages) of users? 27. 28. If you answered yes to Question #25, what is the approximate number of visits to the Kenai Library in the last twelve months? If you answered yes to Question #25, which of the following services were used? 29. (a) ~Intemet (e) Audio cassettes (b) ... Story Hours (f) .. Video cassettes (c) Reference Material (g)~ Books (d) Xerox (h)~ Other Describe what services your library could render that it does not currently provide, or how could the library better serve you? City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 4 of 7 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. The Kenai Community Library Commission has determined the need for the expansion of your library to best serve you. Do you agree with that determination? Yes No If you agree there is a need for library expansion, how would you propose the expansion be funded? Increase property tax. Increase sales tax. Bonding. Other funding (be specific). Do you participate in Kenai Senior Citizens' Programs? Yes No If the answer to Questions//31 is yes, what is your frequency of use of the Kenai Senior Citizens' Center? Times per month. Have you ever had occasion to call upon the services of the Kenai Fire Department, for either fire suppression or emergency ambulance service? (a) Yes (b) No If your answer to question No. 33 was yes, was the need for medical services, fire services, or both? (a) Medical (b) Fire (c) Both If you have called upon the Kenai Fire Department, were you satisfied or dissatisfied with the service and/or response time? (a) Satisfied (b) Dissatisfied If street maintenance is one of your major concerns, indicate which of the following should receive higher priority by placing a 1 in the category most needing improvement, a 2 in the category second most needing improvement and so on until you have ranked all of the areas listed below: (a) Patching Pot Holes (g) Flooded Streets (b) Grading (h) Lighting (c) Dust (i) Sanding (d) Sweeping (j) Paint Striping (e) Repairing cracks (k) Paving (f) Snow Removal City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 5 of 7 38. 39. 40. Where is your first choice for shopping? (a) , Anchorage (b) ,,, Soldotna (c) . Kenai (d) ..... Other What percentage of your shopping dollar is spent in Kenai? If you spend 30% or more of your shopping dollars outside of Kenai, please list the primary reasons and types of products below: 41. What percentage of your shopping dollars is spent on catalog purchases? % 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. What percentage of your shopping dollars are spent on Intemet or TV shopping program sales? % How do you find your personal finances as compared to 1 year ago? (a) Better (b) ~ About the same (c) ~ Worse Which of the following cities on the Kenai Peninsula do you think has the highest property tax mill rate? (a) Homer (b). Seward (c) Kenai (d) Soldotna Which of the following cities on the Kenai Peninsula do you think has the lowest property tax mill rate? (a) Homer (b) Seward (c) Kenai (d) Soldoma If the State requires new taxes, which of the following means of obtaining revenue is your first choice, second choice, third choice, etc? State income tax State property tax State excise taxes State sales tax Increase oil taxes Elimination of permanent fund dividend Capping of Permanent Fund Dividend City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 6 of 7 47. 48. 49. 50. How do you rate senior citizens' services in Kenai? (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Fair (d) ....Poor If City government needed additional funds to function,' which one of the following methods should be used? Additional property mill levy Additional sales tax Cut back services If local governments were forced to cut back on spending, which branch of government should cut back first? Check one. Cities Schools Borough If you were a member of the City Council, what do you think is the single most important problem that the Council should address? Explain: The Mayor and members of the City Council want to thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to fill out this Questionnaire. With your help, it is our hope to be able to better serve you. City of Kenai Public Opinion Survey December 1998 Page 7 of 7 w ~: w 0 0 0 w ~ n r~ 0 n,' '~ -- LLI LIJ 0 0 W I'- O~ ._! 0 < W 0 ~ Z W W w o~ 0 0 w ~ I- z z 0 ~ z z z LIJ W LU 0 0 0 n,' T w 0 T z z ~ o5 m Z ILl Z Suggested by: Administration City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1804-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA APPROPRIATING $17,056 IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT SALARIES. WHEREAS, Ordinance 1790-98 approved the increase in salaries for the Mayor and Council Members; and WHEREAS, this increase was not budgeted; and WHEREAS, money is available for appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations be increased as follows: General Fund Increase Estimated Revenues: Appropriation of Fund Balance $17~056 Increase Appropriations: Legislative- Salaries Legislative- Medicare Legislative- FICA Legislative- PERS Legislative - Workers Comp. $16,000 232 248 528 48 $17,056 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 2nd day of December, 1998. ATTEST: JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance' (11/9/98) id Introduced: Adopted: Effective: November !8, 1998 December 2, 1998 December 2, 1998 Suggested by: Administratx~,~ City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1805-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA APPROPRIATING $145,650 IN THE '98 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. WHEREAS, Ordinance 1782-98 appropriated $600,000 of grant funds for improvements to well houses, pump house, control systems, water line loops and other water system improvements; and WHEREAS, additional grant money is ava~able from a previously received Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) grant in the amount of $26,243; and WHEREAS, the $119,407 balance of the 1996 Municipal Matching Grant is also available; and WHEREAS, the entire project of $745,650 has been approved by ADEC with the following budget: Administrative Expenses Engineering Design Construction Engineering & Management Construction Software Upgrades Total Estimated Eligible Costs $ 5,740 103,696 55,322 553,352 27,540 $745,650 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations be increased as follows: '98 Water System Improvements Capital Proiect Fund Increase Estimated Revenues' State Grant ADEC $ 26,243 State Grant '96 Municipal Matching 119,407 $ 145,650 Increase Appropriations' Administration Construction $ 3,740 141,910 $145,650 Ordinance No. 1805-98 Page Two PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 2nd day of December, 1998. ATTEST: JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance: (11/12/98) kl Introduced: Adopted: Effective: November 18, 1998 December 2, 1998 December 2, 1998 Suggested by: Administn City of Kenai ORDINANCE NO. 1806-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENA1, ALAS~ APPROPRIATING $900,000 IN THE WELL HOUSE 4 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. WHEREAS, the City is in need of a fourth water well and associated infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has offered a $450,000 grant to pay for half of the project; and WHEREAS, the matching money will come from a 1996 direct legislative grant in the amount of $355,975 and a $94,025 contribution from the Water and Sewer Special Revenue Fund; and WHEREAS, a capital project fund titled 'Well House 4' will be used to account for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that estimated revenues and appropriations be increased as follows: Section 1: In the Water and Sewer Special Revenue Fund Increase Estimated Revenues' Appropriation of Fund Balance $ 94,025 Increase Appropriations: Transfer to Capital Project Fund 94,025 Section 2: In the Well House 4 Capital Project Fund Increase Estimated Revenues' State Grants Transfer from Water and Sewer Fund Increase Appropriations: Administration Engineering Design and Inspection Construction $ 805,975 94,025 $ 900,000 $ 3,000 90,000 807,000 $ 900,000 Ordinance No. 1806~98 Page Two PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 2nd day of December, 1998. ATTEST: JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR Carol L. Freas, City Clerk Approved by Finance: (11/13/981 kl Introduced: Adopted' Effective: November 18, 1998 December 2, 1998 December 2, 1998 CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ 1992 MEMORAND TO: ~ Mayor John J. Williams and Council Members FROM:~/~ Cary R. Graves, City Attorney DATE: November 13, 1998 RE: MarkAir Express Bankruptcy Claim On October 16, 1997 the trustee in bmknaptcy for MarkAir Express sued the City of Kenai for $14,045.38, plus prejudgment interest and attorney fees. The complaint alleges the City was paid the money for overdue counter space rent and landing fees in the 90-day period prior to the £din§ of bankruptcy and that the payment constitutes an "avoidable transfer" under the bankruptcy code. Basically, the idea is for the trustee to recapture money paid to creditors for overdue bills in the 90 days prior ro the f'ding of bankruprcT, and spread it our evenly to all creditors. The trustee has offered to settle his claim of $14,045.38, plus prejudgment interest and attorney fees, for $4,000. Does the council agree to settle the claim on that basis? CRG/sp SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made between the City of Kenai ("Claimant") and George Bradford, an individual ("Bradford") . Claimant originally sued Bradford in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District at Anchorage in Kenai v. MSM, Case No. 3KN-89-349 to establish personal liability for unpaid assessments for the Inlet Woods Local Improvement District. Claimant ultimately obtained a judgment against Bradford and others. Claimant and Bradford now desire to resolve all outstanding matters of dispute, 'ncluding the outstanding judgment between them, including but not limited to the City of Kenai's original claims, its current judgment against Bradford for money damages, and any other actions that Claimant could bring against Bradford based upon the establishmenn or existence of the Inlet Woods Local Improvement District. Therefore, the parties agree as follows- 1. Liability. It is expressly acknowledged by Claimant that entry into this Agreement by the City of Kenai and the consideration provided for in nhis Agreement represent the Bradford Settlement Agreement Page ! of 5 compromise of disputed claims and that the execution of this Agreement and the consideration provided for does not constitute an admission of liability, culpability or responsibility on the part of Bradford. 2. Release of Judqment. Claimant agrees to release Bradford from the effects of its current judgment against him in return for the consideration otherwise stated herein and will cause an appropriate acknowledgment and satisfaction of judgment to be filed with respecn to Bradford only and not any other member of MSM Partnership. 3. Release. Claimant agrees to release Bradford from any and all other claims that it may have against him with respect to the Inlet Woods Local Improvement District. 4. Terms of Payment. Following the receipt of six executed warranty deeds conveying the real property described in Attachment A hereto by the attorney for the Claimant (Richard G. Haggart, P.C., 2525 C Street, Suite 420, Anchorage, Alaska 99503), Claimant will immediately execute this Settlement Agreement and acknowledgment and satisfaction of judgment and cause such documents to be filed in the recorder's office in Anchorage, Alaska, as well as such other locations as the judgment has previously been recorded. Bradford agrees and Bradford Settlement Agreement Page 2 of 5 understands that he is solely responsible for any tax liability that may result from the settlement of these claims. Bradford further understands and agrees to reimburse Claimant should any such tax liability be levied by any taxing authority against Claimant, with respect to the settlement agreed to herein. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees with respect to all actions covered and controlled by this settlement. This Agreement shall become effective as to all parties upon the date of its execution. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Alaska and Bradford consents to jurisdiction of the Alaska Superior Court from any disputes arising or related to this Agreement and further consents to venue in the Third Judicial District, State of Alaska for any such proceeding. Date/ rge if rd Bradford Settlement Agreement Page 3 of 5 STATE OF ALASKA ) )SS. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this ~/ ~~day of ~c~~.~ , 1998, personally appeared before me GEORGE BRADFORD, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in 'and for-. ~'...,.~...,.,...~ ~ ~'"~-~ My Commission Expires- Date By: STATE OF ALASKA ) )SS. THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) For the City of Kenai THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of , 1998, personally appeared before me for the CITY OF KENAI, ius , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN LrNDER MY HAND and official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for Alaska My Commission Expires. Bradford Settlement Agreement Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT A Real Property subject to Bradford Settlement Agreement. 1. Lot 3, Block 2, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 1 2. Lot 6, Block 1, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 2 3. Lot 5, Block 1, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 7 4. Lot 4, Block 1, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 7 5. Lot 3, Block 1, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 7 6. Lot 2, Block 1, Salty Dog Heights Subdivision, Part 7 Bradford Settlement Agreement Page 5 of 5 CITY OF KENA! 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 t~.~t-~ 1992 M EMORANDIdM TO:: Mayor John J. Williams and the Kenai City Council FROM: ~/{-~ Cary R. Graves, City Attorney DATE: November !0, 1998 RE: APOC Filing Requirements I spoke with Nancy Freeman of the Alaska Public Offices Commission regarding whether a person applying to £dl Council Member Smalley's seat until the next election would have to £de a conflict of interest statement ar the time of the application. She stated APOC does not consider a person filing a request or application for appointment to fill out part of a term to be a "candidate" under AS 39.50.020. She indicated that in the situation we have the person appointed would have until thirty (30) days after being sworn in to fLle a conflict of interest statement. Please let me know if you have any questions. CRG/sp MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor and Councilmembers Carol L. Freas, City Clerk City of Kenai ~ November 6, ANNUAL EMPI~YEE APPRECIATION DINNER It's that time of the year again when we begin planning for the annual Employee Appreciation Dinner which the council graciously provides to City of Kenai employees to thank them for their effort and dedication for the past year. For the past number of years, the dinner has been held at the Senior Center and catered. In checking, I have been advised the Center would be available on the following dates in January and February. Please keep in mind, we've started late in organizing this year's dinner - mid to late January or February will probably work best. JANUARY FEBRUARY January 2 January 9 January 16 January 23 January 30 February 6 February 13 February 20 DOES COUNCIL WISH TO HOLD THE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION DINNER AT THE SENIOR CENTER? ON WHAT DATE DO YOU WISH TO HOLD THE EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION DINNER? clf TO' FROM' DATE' RE: CITY OF KENA! 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ 1992 MEMORANDUM Mayor and Council Members Carol L. Freas, City Clerk City of Kenai ~ November 9, 1 COUNCIL SEAT VACANCY ADVERTISEMENT Following is a draft advertisement in regard to filling Councilman Smalley's council seat upon his resignation. Please indicate any changes you would like in order for it to be published starting the beginning of December. PUBLIC NOTICE The Kenai City Council is accepting letters of interest and resumds from the citizens of Kenai to fill the council seat to be left vacant in January, 1999. The term will run from January, 1999 through October, 1999. To be considered, you must be a a. Qualified voter of the City of Kenai; b. At least 21 years of age; c. Resident of the City of Kenai for one year, immediately preceding the appointment. Those interested are asked to submit their letters and resumds by December ~, 1998 to Carol L. Freas, City Clerk, 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200, Kenai, AK, 99611-7794. Faxed submittals will not be accepted. K£NAi PENINSULA YOUTH COURT~ INC. October 29, 1998 Richard A. Ross City Manager City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo, Sute 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 RE' Appropriation for Kenai Peninsula Youth Court, Inc. Dear Mr. Ross: On behalf of Kenai Peninsula Youth Court, Inc., I hereby request disbursement of the funds appropriated for this year by the City of Kenai to benefit the Kenai Peninsula Youth Court program. The support of the city is greatly appreciated. I will provide any further information you need to process this request. Thank you again for the support of the City of Kenai. Sincerely, Vir spenshade Coordinator MAIN OFFICE' 145 MAIN STREET LOOP, SUITE 146, KENAI, ALASKA 99611 (907) 283-4017 HOMER OFFICE' 1 26 WEST PIONEER ave, Suite 8, HOMER, ALASKA 99603(907) 235-4985 CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~ MEMORANDUM 1992 TO' FROM' DATE: RE: Mayor and Council Members Carol L. Freas, Ci Clerk, City of Kenai November 9, 1998( PLA~NG & ZONING COMMISSION TRAINING I have received responses from Midge Clouse at the Department of Community & Regional Affairs and Elizabeth Benson (private consultant) in regard to training for the Planning & Zoning Commission. At this time, I am trying to identify dates, length of training, topics to address, to whom the training will be available. DATES: The Planning as Zoning Commission was asked when it would best suit them to attend training. The response was mostly evenings and Saturdays. At this time, it is thought January would be a better time to hold the training due to upcoming holidays and holiday travel. TRAINING LENGTH: In discussing the matter with Clouse, Benson and Marilyn Kebschull, we thought it might best be handled by holding a two-day seminar: basic instruction on a Friday evening and more in-depth all-day instruction on a Saturday. TOPICS: Basic review: Home-Rule City responsibilities regarding planning and zoning Purpose of a Planning & Zoning Commission Kenai Municipal Code v. DCRA Planning Commission Handbook -1- In Depth' Ex parte contacts (phone, in person, site visits) Public hearing procedures, influence on decisions Decision-making process Establishing findings of fact Variances -- Intent and determination if application fits code criteria Conditional Use Permits-- Intent and determination if application fits code criteria. (Suggested premise = give overviews and procedures, then using sample permit requests, hands-on/group activity format to consider them.) Personal liability of commissioners? WHO TO INVITE: City of Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission Cities of Soldotna, Seward and Homer Public COSTS: Trainer / travel: Friday Evening: Saturday: Not known at this time. Coffee, Tea, cookies Breakfast {juice, coffee, muffins, doughnuts, etC.) Working lunch (sandwiches, drinks, etc.) -2- INFORMATION ITEMS KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 18, 1998 o "To Do" List from November 4, 1998 Council meeting. . Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board Agenda for 11 / 12/98 meeting. , 9/98 Kenai Fire Department Consolidated Monthly Report. . 11/12/98 Public Works Project Status Report. o Kenai Peninsula Builders Association - 1999 Gaming Permit Application. o Our Lady of the Angel Church - 1999 Gaming Permit Application. o Your Chamber Today 11 /98. o Resource Review 11 / 98. KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4~ 1998 "TO DO" LIST CLF - Send thank-you letter to Teresa Wemer-Quade for time on P&Z Commission and appointment to Harbor Commission. Advertise work session for November 25, 1998 at 7'00 p.m. at the Senior Center to interview for appointments to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Send letters regarding work session to applicants on file. Do endorsement letter for Councilman Bookey to be appointed to the AML Board of Directors, replacing Councilman Smalley. Questionnaire changes- Changes requested at 10 / 21 / 98 meeting: Questions 2 and 3 are redundant, change. Question 17 - Add Beautification Question 24- include all Parks & Recreation facilities/parks individually/list ski trails and tent campground/include Senior Center. Changes requested at 11 / 4/98 meeting' QuestiOn 25 - Remove (not intention of council to raise sales tax) Question 39 - Remove Longevity Bonus from the list. Question 35 - Include purchases from Intemet and TV with catalog. Question 27- Leave in, but change Kenai Library to Kenai Community Library. Question 26- Remove. Add questions received from Library Commission. Only change is to the last one regarding funding. Change wording of their last question more like' The Kenai Community Library Commission has determined the need for the expansion of your library to best serve you. If the community agrees, how should this be funded? Increase property tax? Increase sales tax? Bonding? Other funding? (Be specific) The questionnaire is to be brought back to council at the November 18 meeting in final form. Page 1 of 2 RR/MK - Include on November HDB agenda a discussion item regarding possible city purchase of property in Old Town for use as museum site, tourist attraction, etc. Report back to council of their recommendations. Inquire for prices to produce an informational brochure on video versus CD Rom. CRG - Inquire with APOC whether an appointee to Councilman Smalley's seat would be required to submit a Conflict of Interest form prior to being appointed. CLF - Begin advertisement requesting letters of interest and resumes from citizens of Kenai who are interested in appointment to council (taking Councilman Smalley's seat) the beginning of December in order to interview in January. Page 2 of 2 KENAI RIVER (,di~~Special Management Area "Working together_for the river" ***Tentative Meeting Agenda*** Thursday, November 12, 1998 7-00 p.m. Cook Inlet Aquaculture. Association Building K-Beach Road I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call Approval of 10/15/98 minutes Agenda Changes and Approval II. PUBLIC COMMENT III. NEW BUSINESS Ao B. Co Marty Rutherford, Deputy Commissioner and Jim Stratton, Director 1998-1999 Board Strategy Planning Session Kenai Mountains National Heritage Area - Jim H. Richardson IV. OLD BUSINESS A. B. Co Do Water Quality Monitoring Framework - Michelle Brown, TNC Commercial Use Committee Report Recreation Impact Committee Report Permit Committee Report · --' V. PUBLIC COMMENT VI. ADJOURNMENT A. Board Comments Date/Agenda of Next Meeting. If you have any agenda changes, please call Chris Degernes at 262-5581 or Ted Wellman at 257-5300 by close of business November 10, 1998. PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF LOCATION FOR THIS MEETING! Kenai Area Office, Box 1247, Soldotna, AK 99669, Soldotna 262-5581 Kenai Peninsula Borough, Box 850, Soldotna, AK 99669, Soldotna 262-4441 Alaska Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Department of Natural Resources, in cooperation with the Kenai Peninsula Borough, KENAI RIVER SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA ADVISORY BOARD Thursday, October 15, 1998 Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association Building K-Beach Road I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call' Chairman Wellman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jeff King, Ted Wellman, Jim H. Richardson, Peggy Mullen, Brannon Ames, Tim Navarre, Ken Lancaster, Robin West, Bill Shuster, Lance Trasky, Les Buchholz, Chris Degemes Members Absent: Stewart Osgood, Joe Moore B. Approval of 9/17/98 Minutes: Hearing no objections, the minutes were approved as written. C. Agenda Chanees and Approval: Under New Business, the Board added Item E' Status Report on the KRSMA Plan and Discussion of Accomplishments. Under Old Business, the Board added Item E' Stares Report on the Water Quality Monitoring Study. There were no objections to the amended agenda. II. PUBLIC COMMENT - None III. NEW BUSINESS A. MP 37-45 Sterlin~ Highway Reconstruction - Laurie Mulcahy, Judy Dougherty, and John Fritz. DOT' John Fritz, geologist for DOT, responded to a letter regarding the material site, 408A, in the Quartz Creek area that the Board sent after the September meeting. This gravel pit was identified several years ago. He stated several alternative sites were evaluated, however, those sites are almost depleted or the material was not suitable for road construction. This particular site has many good features such as relatively flat land, already established Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board , , October 15, 1998 Page 1 access, a good vegetative buffer, and a high water table which could aid in the reclamation of the site as a potential fish pond. After the gravel is extracted, the preliminary reclamation plan will include a 1 O-acre pond set back about 500 feet from the creek and 200-300 feet from the road. It would line up with a culvert that has anadromous fish in it. He commented on two other DOT reclamation project sites on the Peninsula that have been successful. Some of the overburden and stumps would be put back into the water for fish cover. The alders & willows would be spread back around to re-seed and revegetate. DOT will develop the site incrementally. Over time they may have to come back and make another pond but would work separately from the first pond. They would then dig a channel to connect the ponds. DOT would want to develop some sort of management agreement ~vith DNR and ADF&G manage the reclaimed area when they were finished with it. Little active management would be necessary. Mr. Fritz believed the site would have adequate gravel for the road construction project. Access would be obtained via an existing mining road and they would work away from the sub station. Mr. Fritz was unaware of bald eagle nests in the area and was advised to contact USF&W Service regarding that and other wildlife habitat issues. Gary_ Leipitz stated when loss of wetlands occurs DOT will have to identify how they will mitigate the site, and work with Fish & Game to come up with the specific design. There was discussion of the desire to keep the area isolated and restrict access as it may be critical habitat for brown bear. Discussion noted that ideas of moving the Cooper Landing rifle range to the area also would conflict with bear habitat sensitivity,. Shuster noted that the ponds may not be seen from the highway, but the extracted gravel stockpiled above ground level would be easily visible during construction. DOT would start developing that area closest to the creek because that is where the water table is highest and it is close to three culverts that carried anadromous fish. The depth of the pond would be a maximum of 20 feet. The gravel pit is expected to fill up with groundwater. There ~vill not be a net loss of groundwater but there will be exposure of the ground water. If it is done in a proper fashion, it won't be a predator pit and chances are it won't impact or dry, up other creeks. ]'his project would help to expand the existing available fish habitat in the area. Further development of the site would take place farther back from the creek and then connect to the original pond. On the other hand, starting farther back would necessitate building a long channel to connect it to the culverts, and more recurring impacts as subsequent projects are done. There was discussion regarding alternative gravel pit sites. The site used in the past at Moose Pass is almost depleted, and what remains is needed by DOT for maintenance purposes. There is an extension area near there but it contains marginal material. The site near Schooner Bend is unusable now because of the trailhead, a US Forest Service road and cultural resource sites. , Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 2 Judy Dougherty, DOT, stated the new road will be an upgraded two-lane road with passing zones. The road will also have wider shoulders and will basically follow the existing road alignment. DOT wants to develop the gravel site under a separate permit from the road construction project itself. Any mitigation would be tied to just the gravel extraction activities at 408A. Fisler stated it is difficult to look at the Site 408A gravel extraction as a separate project from the road construction project especially since DOT is just making the area available and not designating how it will be developed by the contractor. There was discussion of controlling the staging area and taking down fewer trees. The stockpiles will be temporary. The area will be left to naturally revegetate. If the contractor chooses to use the site, conditions can be placed in the specifications of the plan. If this site ~vas not used, the contractor may have to go to Seward or Soldotna for gravel. There was discussion of other road projects and gravel requirements for them. Navarre advised not to let the contractors pick their staging areas. He believed DOT should work with F&G and state the location of the staging area will be located. There will be a 30-day public notice for comments. Wellman stated his concern about ugly gravel pits and would like to know more about the impact of the site other than just the gravel extraction. He would like to know if other activities such as an asphalt plant would be allowed. If an asphalt plant was allowed, would another pond be developed for a settling pond for their particulates. Mr. Leipitz believed if a settling pond was established, the pit would have to be lined. Chairman Wellman thanked the representatives from DOT for their information and time. He invited Laurie Mulcahy to address the MP 37-45 project at a furore meeting. Chairman Wellman stated he would be willing to write another letter expressing concerns regarding the gravel extraction and on an asphalt plant. MOTION: Degernes moved to amend earlier comments to the Division of Lands regarding 408A and would cautiously allow exploration of the site for a gravel resource but only with the assurance that the Departments of Fish & Game and Environmental Conservation will work with the Department of Transportation on mitigation and fish and wildlife concerns and environmental impacts. Richardson seconded. Richardson believed a more detailed concept plan is needed and other altematives need to be sought. He believed the highway does need to be improved from a safety standpoint, but it should be done in an environmentally sensitive way. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 3 VOTE ON MOTION TO ALLOW EXPLORATION OF SITE 408A FOR GRAIL RESOURCE' MOTION PASSED' Unanimous without objection. B. 1998 Law Enforcement Report- Ran~er B il__! Berkhahn Ranger Berkhahn gave a report on the 1998 season law enforcemem activities. The newest ranger completed his field training during the summer so now all four rangers are fully commissioned. Of the four law enforcement agencies that have a presence on the fiver, State Park Rangers are the prime law enforcement personnel on the river and are well- trained professionals. He passed out a summary showing the law enforcement activities for the years 1995 through 1998. In 1998, 132 citations were issued by State Park Rangers and 18 citations were issued by ADF&G personnel. Berkhahn commented that generally the registered guides are law abiding but noted that 14 citations were issued to guides (mostly for parking or non-payment of fees violations). It was also noted that number of citations . issued were down. Possible reasons could be the number of days rangers were on the water and differing enforcement methods, Pillars was now open, and the fishery itself was slower. Fisler noted she received fewer complaints this year from property owners regarding guide behavior, however, she's now receiving more complaints from guides about other guide behavior. The guides are beginning to police themselves and a higher standard of behavior is being expected. She noted that none of the seven guides that were suspended this year for citations in 1997 received any citations this season. There are two guides from this season that are candidates for 1999 suspensions. Degemes stated she believed next season Parks will have more ranger time on the fiver, with Ranger Hensel's field training now being complete. She commented there is a proposal for ADF&G Sportfish to fund an additional law enforcement position that would be a floating position between the Kenai, Kasilof, Ninilchik, Deep Creek or Anchor River areas and would xvork wherever the fishing pressure is the greatest. Shuster suggested publishing the law enforcement and citation figures at the beginning of next season, not to show off quotas but to heighten awareness of law enforcement activities on the river. Berkhahn stated that even though he believed his officers did an adequate job on the river this past season, the law enforcement needs to be beefed up--not only Park Rangers but officers from other agencies need to become more involved on the river. C. 1998-1999 Board Strategy Planning Session Due to time constraints, this item was moved to next month's agenda. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 4 IV. D. Review of Board Applications Degemes stated the Board currently has three vacancies and these vacancies have been advertised since September, although she believes personal recruiting is a more successful process. Three applications have been received from James Fassler, Robert Merchant, and J. Vincent O'Reilly. Ann Whitmore Painter has indicated she would like to apply and an application is on the way. Degemes believed all applicants are good candidates. She noted that Ann Painter has a good working knowledge of the Moose Pass area and that Vince O'Reilly could be a good liaison with the City of Kenai. Wellman desired to send all four names to the Commissioner without specific comments one way or the other. E. Status of Plan Richardson stated the Plan was signed off by Commissioner Shively in December 1997, and part of the implementation of the recommendations was to have it available to the general public. He is very concerned that the final plan has not yet been printed. He commented it was hard to be effective without a printed copy in hand. He would like the final Plan immediately. Wellman noted that nothing had been done on the plan for about a year so a conference was set up with Bruce Phelps. After a lot of dancing around and skirting the issue, they said the plan would go to the printers the first week of November. Degemes stated she was unaware that nothing was being done until Bruce Phelps jumped back into it and advised her. She noted that the Board does have a final plan, the narrative on the xeroxed copy has not changed. What we're waiting for is the plan version with all of the updated graphics and maps in a final, polished form There was discussion of the need to have a final plan and possible need of political action if they are not soon received. Richardson would like a furore agenda to include a discussion of the highlights and accomplishments of the plan. OLD BUSINESS A. Boat Wake Impact Committee Report · Degemes reported there was a meeting with several interested persons to discuss and find some funding for Joe Dorava to finish his existing boat wake study. They also discussed the concerns the board expressed last month about our study being done on flat water rather than on the river. Even though it would be scientifically valid, the public may not accept it. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 5 They would like to corroborate some fiat water studies with the fiver column data. group would also like to piggyback the new information with existing information. The Brenda Kerr and Joe Dorava will work on a revised draft that will show how the new data will tie in with previous work, along with how they will develop a user-friendly report. Dorava will meet with Brenda Kerr prior to the next meeting to make sure they are on track with the draft. Wellman requested copies of the draft be sent to Board members prior to the next KRSMA meeting. Hopefully, the Board can vote on a final plan in December. Joe Dorava wanted the Board to know that he is working closely with the Corps of Engineers for a unified effort. He stated the Waterways Experimental Station (WES) will bring a great deal of experience to the process as well as a funding mechanism. He realizes that the geotechnical portion of the study seemed too low a cost, but noted they are willing to subsidize the study because of the national interest. The people from WES are coming without salary and cost of travel. He noted that to his knowledge, no such boat wake study has ever been done on any fiver. Ames stated there may be a study out of Minnesota and the Kenai Watershed Forum is investigating. B. Guide Committee Revort King reported the committee has met and has set a regular meeting schedule for twice a month. The four issues they will discuss include: 1) the guide orientation, 2) permit stipulations, 3) rental boat fees, and 4) guide fees. Wellman added that the possibility of a user fee was discussed; but since it would affect all users and not just guides, the committee did not feel they were the appropriate committee to discuss this controversial issue. Wellman desired to form a subcommittee to discuss the user fee issue, but will wait until new members are appointed to the Board. C. Recreation .Impact Committee Report Degemes stated that the general public fbr years has requested that guides be limited; but past proposals could not pass due to constitutional constraints. Instead of the Attorney General's office reacting to our proposals, the Board would like them to work with Parks on developing a study or a process that could meet a constitutional challenge. She will be asking for a meeting with the Attorney General's office soon. She would also like to address what recreational impacts have changed and whether there has been a shift of tolerances toward those impacts. Wellman agreed: if the Board does not have the full engagement of the Attomey General's office in helping Parks through the various possibilities, then it is a waste of time. He would like the AG's office to work proactively with Parks and the Board. He will request through Commissioner Shively that someone be specifically assigned to help formulate ideas. We need some answers and not just a bunch of"no's" after the fact. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 6 ge VI. D. Permit Committee Report.. Fisler reported that she did call FERC and talked to Ed Crouse. They did indeed receive the advisory board comments and are considering them. Mr. Crouse stated there was a possibility that the draft EA would be revised and they are also considering hiring consultants to conduct meetings to discuss the project. Trasky noted that Fish & Game didn't even receive the draft EA, and they are one of the intervenors. Fisler also reported on a meeting conceming the Sterling Highway 37-45 Project, and her concerns regarding mitigation of the road impacting both Quartz and Daves Creeks, plus the Unit 408A gravel pit. She had concerns because DOT is trying to separate the gravel pit issue from the road issue. She believed the whole thing should be considered as one. She was also concerned because they want the project addressed under a Nationwide Permit rather than an Individual Permit review. There was also discussion of alternative sites for the gravel pit. She voiced concerns of DOT not giving specific conditions for the use of the site but giving some contractor broad parameters for the site if he wants to use it. There are many impacts associated in developing the pond and staging in that area. Fisler noted they were not on a time clock at the moment because DOT has withdrawn their Nationwide Permit request. When DOT reactivates the request, Parks will reiterate their concems. Fisler also reported on the Nationwide Permits consistency finding and gave an overview of what was exempted in relation to the Kenai River. The Corps has developed their own minimal conditions and the State is in the process of reviewing those. E. Water Quality Smdv Last Spring the Kenai River Water Quality Monitoring Coalition presented a draft of the framework of the water quality study. The document is currently in draft review status and the comment period will close November 4. Further revisions will be made ,-md then presented to the subcommittee consisting of Ken Lancaster, Peggy Mullen and Les Buchholz. Buchholz requested that the revised dra~ be placed on the next agenda for discussion. PUBLIC COMMENT - None ADJOURNMENT A. Board Comments Ames pointed out that the Commissioner is in violation of the Board's by-laws by not appointing new members to the Board. He reiterated the need to have new members appointed immediately. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October i5, 1998 Page 7 Lancaster appreciated DOT sending representatives this evening but noted he is still concerned about the gravel pit. MOTION: NAVARRE MOVED TO REFERENCE THE BOARD'S CONCERNS IN THE LETTER TO THE COMMISSIONER REGARDING THE GRAVEL PERMIT AND ALSO COPY THE DIVISION OF LANDS WITH THE LETTER. LANCASTER SECONDED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUS WITHOUT OBJECTION. Mullen would like to get a copy of the EVOS study regarding the effects on salmon because she thought it may help the Board's understanding. West spoke on recent KNWR acquisitions which will be developed for recreational access. Shuster stated that DOT is looking at another project at Mile 8-18.5, Seward Highway, that will impact the Kenai River drainage. He also reported there was a water quality survey done along the Kenai River looking at human waste. He believed there may be a time the Board would want to voice concern over the amotmt of human waste along the fiver and address DOT about their responsibility in developing more rest stops to help reduce the waste. Navarre stated he is committed to getting the KRSMA Plan adopted by the Assembly. He looks forward to seeing the final plan. Richardson stated DNR and Parks should be commended for the tmique planning process they went through in developing the plan. It was a cooperative effort. B. Date/Aeenda of Next Meeting The November meeting will be a week earlier on November 12. Having no further business, Chairman Wellman adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m.. Respectfully submitted, Earlene Reed, Recording Secretary Division of Parks & Outdoor Recreation Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board October 15, 1998 Page 8 KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT CLASSIFICATION OF ALARMS Month' September 1998 I MONTH I I MONTH ILAST YEAR} TO DATE / TO DATE I · II II I I III I~ I II I / IIII I i i ,1 i i i i ii i i Ill I I ,A!rport 6 .... 0 ' 0 3 '" ' 8 Structural ' 3 " 3 '2 ' 14' 13 OUt Building,s .... 0 , 0 0 ' 2 ' 1 Brush or Grass , . 0 3 0 ..... 12 11 Forest , ~ 0 0 0 0 Dumpsters 0 ' '0 0 " 3 ' 2 Vehicles , ,, 1 ' ' 1' ' 0 ' 10 ' 11 Hazardous Materials 1' 0 ' 1 ' ' 6 ' '18 Alarm Malfunction '1 0 ' 2' ' 11 ' '8 GOod Intent ........ 3 " 3 0 ' 24 ..... 18 ~escue.Asst. 3 5 3 33 '31 Mutual/Aut0Ai'd ' ' ' 4 ~' '2 3 ' '29 31 M. iscel!aneous ,' . 2. ' 0 ' .., 1., 9 ' 2 T TAL FIRE ALARMs ' '18 ,17 12 155 149 I I I I ! II I I I I II II I I I Medi, ,cai_ ...... 43 , 44 37, , 372, ,391 i~escue 0 0 0 3 4 Routin~ I ransport ' 0 .... 1 2 17 15 Good Intent ' ' 0 ' 0 0 0 " 6 Mutual'Aid ' , ' ' '0j 0 0 2 ' 1 , , ITOTAL EMs, ,,A'LARMS,, ,,, I ";43! ,, 451 ', 39! ,, , ,' 394! ' 411 ~ 'iOTAL ALARMs " 61 62, ,51 ,549 ~'~0 i -- I II I I I I I I I I I I I I ,.M.°;b. il,eH°me . . "."l ,___$0[ .... $0-[,' ' , $0 I.,. $31,000.1 . .. $;~0O-- V.ehicle , i ' '. ", ! , $5,000J . $OJ $0] $32,600]-' Motor Vessel ,, I , $0 { ',,SO l .. '$O'[ ,'$30'QQQ [, , ,' SO Loss Of Life (l'n Fire) .... 0 0t' '0'tl ' 1. l Injuries'lnFires " ' ,0 ' ' ,. 0 '0.,, ',. ' 4t ' KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT CAUSES OF FIRES Month: September 1998 IM 'I-~¢S I LAST YEAR ONT}~ TO DATE , NUM' I EST'. L, oSS ii i THIS YEAR TO DATE ,NUM. ~ EST. LOSS lin. Buildings & Mobile Homes 1 ,, , ,, , ,, , , .... , , , ,,,, , Chimneys,. Soot, Flues 0 0 $0.00 ,. 2 $22,500.00. Sparks . . 0 .. 0 .... $0.00 ,, 0 ...... $0.00. Defective Heaters 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Combustibles Near Heaters 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Open Lights, Flames . 1 . 2 $40,000.00 1 . $2,000.00. Hot Ashes 0 1 $50,000.00 0 $0.00 ~ , Oil burners/Furnaces 0 0 $0.00 0 $0 00 , , , , , , Careless Smokin~ . 0 1 $0.00 1 .$15,000.00 Children With Matches 0 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 , , ,1 , , i, , ,1, , Careless Use Of Matches 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Defective Electrical Wiring 1 4 $661,700.00 1 $0.00 Appliances & MotorslElec. . . 1 . 1. $0.00 3 $8,550.00. Flammable liquids .. . 0 .. 0 $,0.00 .. 0. . $0..00. Co. okincj Appliances . .0 .. 4 $11.,.000.00. 4 $525.00.. Rekindle 0 1 $30,000.00 0 $0.00 , , , 1, , ,,, , , , , , ,, , , ,i , , , Spontaneous Ignition .0... 0 $.9.00 0 . .$0.00 Fireworks 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Tools (Cuttincj, Weldincj) . 0 . 0 . $0.00... 0 . $0.00 Incendiary ..... 0 1 $25,000.00 .. 0 . $0.00 Misc. Known Causes 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Suspicious . . 0 .... 0 $9-00 0. $0.00 Unknown 0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Total Building Fires 3 15 $817,700.00 13 $48,575.00 KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK Month' September 1998 SUN. MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRI. SAT. TOTAL 6 9 15 8 7 8 8 61 CALLS BY TIME OF DAY Month: September 1998 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 1 0 2 1 1 1 3 2 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 2 1 1 0 3 5 4 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 7 8 2 2 3 1 2. 5 TOTAL CALLS 6,1 KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT OCCUPANCY TYPE Month: September 1998 ' ' THIS YEAR TO DA'~E , !NS?. ! FI ,R, ESI , $ LOSS LAsT YEAR TO DATE' INS ,P. ! FiRES,,I $ L,OSS ...... i.,Ui:iLi(.;' .... 'L6cal GOVernment ' State GOvernment "Federal Government ' Schools ' Pre-S~:hools ......... C'hurchs ' ' Amusement/Recreation /JWi=LL'/'N~ Hotels/Motels ,, Lodging Apartments/Multi ' Dwellings Stores/Dwellings Four Plex's Mobile H6mes 4 3, 15 o 0 15 0 $0.oo $o.oo $0.00 $2,000.00 $o. Oo $o. oo $0.oo ss,oOo.oo $o. oo $15,5~5.00 $22,550.OO ' $0.00 $O. oO $300.00 , 0 12 6 2 2 ,,~ ,, '' '0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 "$o.o0 $o. oo SO.dO $0.00 "$0.00 ' '$0.00 $0.00 , , ' '$0.00' $0.00 $i5,000.00 $86,000'0'0' $o:o0 $0.00 $31 ,oo0.0o in I Retail Stores Restaurant/Bars le Mercantile e Warehouses Malls ~es 14 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 $0.00 28 1 6 1 0 000.00 00 $25,000.00 Metal Fabrication Misc. Manufacture Lumber Yards Stations Gara es =ers 0 0 0 0 0 $0.00 Petroleium Plants Wharf Pro es Fish Processin IRefineries MISC.. st. ructur&s 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 $o.0o J "~;0.oO 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ ," $o. oo , $o.0o J KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION Month' September 1998 THIS 'LAST HIS MONT LASTYEAR THIS YEAR MONTH MONTH I LAST YEAR~ TO DATE TO DATE i i ~i i iiii _ Il I I I II IIIi i i , Insp. Pending,,Letters 0 0 0 55 19 Inspections .,, 23 31 9 79 ' 117 Re-Inspections , 3 4 0 9 20 Violations Noted 32 39 16 36 145 , , , No!ice of Violations Issued. , 13 13 6 16 53 Violations Corrected ,,.15 , 21 2 ,' . 23 , 89 Extensions Granted , 0 .0 , 0 0 ., 1 ExtensiOns Denied 0 0 0 0 0 Fire Drills SuperviSed '1 0 0 ' i 2 Fire prevention Classes.. , 1 ,0 ' ," 3 37 27 Station fours . ,, 0 2 2 31 ' ' 21 , , iotal Class Audience 1.._~_50 2.__.____~587~2 ~48 Total Tour Audience 0 20 4 426 297 Burning Permits Issu~d ' 36 ' 30' 3~ 243 ' ' 3i0 Land Clearing Permits 0 ' 0 1' ' 1 0 C.°urt Actions Instituted 0 0 0 5 ' 0 Arrest {Resulted From) 0 0 0 5 0 ,, , Convictions ~0 ___.___~0 ~0 0 0 Complaints Recieved , 0 0 0 '~- 1'~~~~- , C, ompiaints Acted.On , . 0 0 0 8 15 , Fire Watches Ordered 0 0 0 0 0 Acci.dental Fi[es Invest. '1 ' 3 ' '1 21 " '14 S, usp, icious Fires Invest. , ,, ,0 0 0 10 8 I~otal Investigations 1 3 ' . 1 '31 22 Plan Reviews Conducted, , 0 0 1 i0 ' '3 KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT DIVISION OF TRAINING MONTH' September 1998 ITHis / LAST frillS MONTFI LA'ST YEAR MiQN,THIMO NIHI,L, AST Y, EAR! T, 0 DATE,, ITHIS YEAR to i ' ' ' '" ' ..... '" ...... P,.h,¥sicai Fitness." ..',,. '72 73'5 ..', 95 ..,' 577 ' 725.5 Area Familiarization 44.5 13 23 297.5 183.5 Fir~ Fighier Safety , ' ..... i0' .7 ., " 4.5 '70~5 ,, "" 52.5 Officer Training ..... 15.'5 10.546,5 340 . ~343 Apparatus 97 '1'00 .... 143 '";1426.5 959.5 Operating Ap. paratus ' ' '70.~ 64.5"' 95.5' '939 ' 607 P. ortable Fire ExtinguiShers '4.5 . 0 .....0.5 . 38.5 , 1415 Forcible Entr~ , ,,0 . 1 5.5 12 , 28.5 Ropes &, Knots . .2' 1 i i' 4.5 111 42.5 Ladders 6 42.5 25' ' 186.5 ' ' 117.5 Hose.Maintenance " 22.5' 21.5 24 343 244.5 Hose. Lays ' ' 8 9 32.5 ' 253 13~) Salva[te & Overhaul 19 9 14 87 95 Firestreams 10.5 8 ' 17 " 131.5 ' 103 , , , , ,, , i , , , , , , i , , i Hydraulics 1 13.5 16.5 103.5 84 Water. Suppi¥'s,' ' . 38. 11 "'. 1.6..5 ' . 180.5 132 Ventilation 0.5 2 4.5 29.5 45.5 I J ! ! I~ Ill I Breathing Apparatus 415 4 7 94.5 66 Rescue Operations '1.5 ' 11.5 25.5 "'108.~ 189.5 Fire Prevention/Arson 17.5' 64.5 ' ' 8 167 ' '226.5 p're_ Fire Planning 25.5 6 11.5 57 100 S ,prinkle. r Sy, s.,!ems 13.5 0 15 39.5 24.5 Fire Tactics & Strategy 8.5' , 1 ,, 13 ..... 89 ...... 96.5 H~zardous Materials 9.5 0 1.5 71.5 53 Confine.d.....Space Entry.. ' 0' ' 0 0 ..... 28 " 14 Multi- ~,ompan¥ Drills ,33 2 , 0 , 76 77 Formal Schools 0 16 '0 91 104 Live Fire Operations ' . ,21 '7. 4 182 .. "'114 Totaj Class Hours .........27 62.5 76.5 663,5 ..... 657 Total Fiel'd Hours .... 5,5.9 446.5 ' 587 "5468'.5 4315.5' I AI'"CLAS$1PIP_.Lu ! $S6 l., $° il ,,',. ss3.sl 6132l "4972.51 KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT DIVISION OF TRAINING MONTH' September 1998 THIS' i LAS'~' FHIS MON'TI-C.AST YEAI~THIS ~EAI~ MONTH ,MONTH, ILAST YEAR! TO DATE~ TO DATE, ~ i i i , ii i i , i i ii i J i i il Anatomy &'.Patient' Assesment , 32 .. 22 30.5 291,.5 32i Triage ,, 3.5 . 1.5 , 0 2 , 6.5 Chest Iniuries .... 0 . 1 i.5 ' 14.5' 1' ShOck & I.V. Therapy. ,, 18.5 16 , , 21 , 185.5 205 Hemo,r,rhac.:je Control 3 2.5 1.5 2,5.5' 35 Basic LifeSUpp0rt ' ' 7.5 '8 ...... 12 '" 58' ' ' 86.5 Fractures & Dislocations 5 2.5 ' 0 59.5' 48.5 Head & Neck Injuries .... 3.5' ",5.5 6 ' '60.5 50.5 Abdominal & Genital Systems 0.5 , 0 1".5 10.,5 , , 8 c.ardiac/Arrh¥/Strokes , 10 ,9 17.5 , i74.5 112.5 Respirat0~ Systems, 7 4 5.5 121 . 88.5 Airway Mana(:jement , 18.5 14 22.5 143.5 184 Childbirth 0 ' 0 ' 0 ' 7 ' 10.5 , , , i, , i,, il ,iii , , patient Handling, 26 19.5 , 25.~ , , 26~,.5 238 Heat & Cold ,I. nju.,ries 0 0 1 4 8 Radiation & Electrical Iniuries' i' 0 0 ' ' 0 0 0 P°is. 0n&Aller9'?s ...... 3 ' 0 ' 3' ' 18 2015 Pediatrics 1 2 0.5 42..5 19 15'harm~col'ogy ....... 5.5 1 9' ' 96 57; Advanced Life SuPPort ' 0 1 ' 0 ' ' 92 ' 13.5 Diabetes 0 1.5 ' 1 17 23 ,, , , , Quality Assurance 2 5 7.5 157.5 76 Driving . ,9.5 .. 9.5.. 14.5 144.5 101.5 Medicai./L.e.,c.:Jal Term'in°lig¥ , 0 0 0 50 38 Rules&Responsibilities . ,0 .... '0 . 0 .... 28 '14 EMS S¥stem ,& Communication~ 2 0 0 .... 61.5 26.5 Mast Pants 0 0 0 1 3.5 Alcohol & Dru~l Abuse 6 1.5 8 25.5 18.5 E~ehavioral Eme,rgencies' ' 0, ' 0 ..... ., 0' , , 16.5 ' 18.5 infoct°Us Disease Control 10.5 5.5' 15' '133 113 , , i , i , , , i i 'Total Class HoL~rs ' 9.5 0 11 466.5 293.5 Total FieldHoU'rS' ' ' 165 '132.5 ' 193.'5 i838.5 " 16~2.5 i ..... · , i ~ , , , i iTOTAL CLAss/FIELD. I 74.sj. 32.s,.I '.. 204 s' I 2.3051 s4sl KENAI FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT DIVISION OF TRAINING MONTH' September 1998 !THIS~ ~ST irH~s MONTFI LAsT ~;EARI Ti-IlS' YEAR MONT~MONT,, ,Hi ~ST YEAR! i TO D.ATE TO DATE ' ' , , , i i i ~j' ~r~rr ~Ul:ljI:~i~ ' ' "" j Airport Familia'rizati~)n ..,' ,,' .'i2.5 , 9 ',,, 815 82' ' ' 55 Aircraft Familiarization 0 4 0 23 11 5 Fire Fightersafei¥ '' '0 2 ' ' 4 ' 32.5 ' 2'5 Emerg.enC¥ c°n~'muniCations 0 '2 3.5 " 22 ' 22.5 Hose,~Nozzle, Turret. Op, ,.erat.,ion., ,' 2 ,', 0'" 5.~5, "" , 61.5 , 47.5 Agent. Applications 4 4 2.5 30 44 Aircraft Evacuatio~q 0' '0 .... 0 '16 0.5 Fire. Fi'CJhting .Operations . 0 2 1.5 . 34.5 . 27 St,r, uctural Adaptation 4 0 0 , 4 8.5 Car~l,o Hazards 0 0 0 4 0 Airport Emer~encyPlan ..... ,0 ,,, ' ,4 , 0 " , 8 ' 11.5 Hazardous Materials 0 0 0 5 0 Alerts I, II, III ..... 0 4 .... 2.5 28 ' 21.5 Multi- Com.p,,a.,.ny D'ri'lls, ,' ..... ,0 0 ' . 0 0 , 16 Formal Schools 0" 0 0 ~!12 0.5 Total Class Hours 8 16 3.5 103 31 Total Field' Hours ' '14.5 " '15 24.5 359.5 259 l!°tat,'clas~tField , ! 22,.s'1 3~ '1 '281' ,,, 462...sl, .'" 2901 Project status Report A/KC/F/ City Contact Preject Name STiI A JL Alaska Regional Fire Training Facility, ARFF A=Active NC=Non-Construction F=Future STIP=State Trans. Imp. KK- Keith Kornelis JL- Jack La Shot RS - Robert Springer MK - Marilyn Kebschull Jet- Jan Taylor /, status Building occupied... Training sessions taking place... Props are being installed... Remaining site work items to be completed in the Spring. A KK Bluff Erosion PIN doing study. A J,L/RS Challenger Learning Center Thirty percent design review 11/12/98... KPB to reclassify site...Waiting for site to be transferred to City ownership. A MK Comprehensive Plan $60,000 appropriated in Capital Project Fund. A JL Contaminated Soils- Shop Kent & Sullivan preparing reports. A KK Crow Court LID Public Hearing 11/4/98. A KK Cunningham Park Engineering design ongoing. A JL K.M.A. Taxiway "C" Extension North Final inspection 10/13/98... Only item remaining is sign work... Project in use. A JL Multi-use Facility Waiting for site to be transferred to City ownership. Site parking study completed... Received proposals for A/E services...Need to appropriate money. A KK STP Expansion/Planning Have received DEC Grant... RFP tentative 1/99. A JL Underground Storage Tank- Airport A KK WH 1 & 2 and Pumphouse Modifications Tank pull complete...Approximately 300 yds. of soil stockpiled for future cleanup. Draft report has been submitted to DEC. Engineering design is ongoing. Received ADEC grant for additional funding. Thursday, November 12, 1998 Page 1 of 2 A/NC/F/ A KK City Contact Project Name WH 4 status Received ADEC grant funding...Contact Borough on land ownership, Swires & Lawton. F JL City Maintenance Facility Schematic design complete...awaiting funding. F KK S. Spruce Beach Parking Corps permit process complete...No funding appropriated as yet. Grant application submitted for Exxon Valdez Funds. EVOS Commission did not select project for funding... EVOS director suggests a study. F KK South Side Kenai River Road and Parking For Southside dip netters...Submitted grant application for Exxon Valdez Funds...EVOS Commission did not select project for funding. EVOS director suggests a study. F MK Title 14 Review Revisions pending 1999/2000 funding. F KK Water Quality/Quantity Development Program Waterline loops only remaining project not fully funded. NC JL/RS ADA City Building Study Several items underway... Fire alarm system at Rec Center...Hardware & doors at various facilities. STIP KK DOT- Bridge Access Pathway Pathway along Bridge Access Road from K-Beach to Spur 3.3 miles...Design FFY 00 at $250,000...ROW FFY 00 at $100,000...Constr. FFY 01 at $1,400,000. STIP KK DOT- Forest Drive DOT in design stage .... Design FFY 98. Construction FFY 00...Completed the first plans-in- hand review. STIP KK DOT- Unity Trail Pathway Pathway along Kenai Spur from MP 2.8 to 8.1. Design FFY 00 at $200,000...ROW FFY 00 at $100,000...Const. FFY 01 at $1,700,000. Thursday, November 12, 1998 Page 2 of 2 1999 Gaming Permit Application IOrganization'Name . ' Game Type (use for completing information below.) Bingo Deep Freeze Classics '"'r=laffles Dog Musher's Contest v"PulI-Tabs Dog Mushing Sweepstakes Contest of Skills Fish Derbies Canned Salmon Classics IFederal El N Goose Classics Ice Classics King Salmon Classics Mercury Classics Permit Number ~ ~- O~lta t Race Classics Rain Classics Salmon Classics Snow Machine Classics ACTIVlTES CONDUCTED BY ORGANIZATION Facility Name Physical Address Game Type Is Facility I~ Owned I~Leased I~1 Donated I~1 Owned I~' Leased I~1 Donated I~1 Owned ~ Lease~ (. ~' ~ ~, ~' I~ Donated ~;t s ~ I~1 Owned I~1 Leased I~1 Donated I~1 Owned I~1 Leased I~1 Donated I~1 Owned [~1 Leased I~1 Donated ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY VENDOR (pull-tabs are the only games a vendor can conduct) Vendor registration and fee must be attached. Name of Vendor Physical Location Vendor Number ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY OPERATOR I Name of Operator Physical Location Game Type(s) Operator's License Number ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY MULTIPLE-BENEFICIARY PERMITTEE IName of MBP Physical Location Game Type(s) MBP Number DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS. Tho organization must plan to uso the net proceeds from gaming activities for political, educational, civic, public, charitable, patriotic or religious uses in Alaska. (See statutes and regulations for specific rules.) In the space provided, tell how your organization Intends to use the net proceeds from ,qamin,q activities. (Be specific) 04-826 (revised 10/98) bac~ Alaska Department of Revenue Income and Excise Audit Division PO Box 110420 Juneau, Alaska 99811-0420 Telephone (907) 465-2320 ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Federal EIN Organization Name Mailing Address State of Alaska 1999 Gaming AS 0lS.15t'l:I20 ........... ' .......... --, Check one ~.~~,,.- ~,~ ~ New [[~Rene Permit NUmber Telephone Number 5~ 7' - ~ Fax Nun~ber E-mail Address City IStat.e IZip Code TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (check one box. For definition see AS 05.15.690) I~1 Charitable I~1 Fishing Derby Association I~1 Civic or Service I~1 Fraternal I~1 Dog Mushers Association I~1 Labor (~1 Educational I~l Municipality ORGANIZED AS , I~;orporation I~1 Partnership ,, TYPE OF GAMES (check all games that you will conduct. For definitions see AS 05.15.690) (~1 Bingo I~affles & Lotteries (~1 Puli-Tabs I~1 Dog Musher's Contest (~1 Fish Derbies I~1 Other [~eligious I~1 Veterans [~1 IRA/Native Village Contest of Skills Rain Classic Nonprofit Trade Association Outboard Motor Association Police or Fire Department Polities_! Association Snow Machine Classic PERSONS IN CHARGE OF GAMES. Persons must be active members of the organization, or an employee of the municipality, and designated by the or.qanization. Members may not be licensed as an oDerator, vendor, or emDIoyee of a vendor. Primary Member Name Social Security Number Daytime Telephone Number I~1 Yes I~1 No Aitemate Member Name Social Security Number Mailing Address City, State and Zip Code Daytime Telephone Number Has the alternate member taken and passed the test? [~1 Yes Permit number under which the test was taken. I~l No Mailing Address City, State and Zip Code Has the primary member taken and passed the test? Permit number under which the test was taken. THESE QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED. (see instructions) [~1 Yes {~1 No Has any member of management or any person who is responsible for gamtng activities ever been convicted of a felony, extortion, or a violation of a law or ordinance ot this state or another jurisdiction that is a crime involving theft or dishonesty or a violation of gambling laws? I~ Yes I~1 No Does any member of management or any person who is responsible for gaming activities have a prohibited financial interest a.~ ri~.finR{'t hv 1 .~ AAC 1R0..qs.~? We declare unsworn falsification, that we have examined this application, including any attachment, and that to the best of our knowledge and We understand that any false statement made on this aDDlication or any attachments is Dunishable bv law. Jre (see instructions) Printed Name Idress of President or Vice President Daytime Telephone IPermit/Fee: Check the appropriate box and enclose the correct amount. The permit fee is based on 1998 estimated gross receipts. I I ~_ . Make checks payable to the State of Alaska I See Instructions for mandatory attachments. 04-826 (revised 10/98)front A copy of this application must be sent to all applicable municipalities and boroughs. 1999 Gaming Permit Application IOrganization Name Game Type (use for completing information below.) "Bingo Deep Freeze Classics ~affles Dog Musher's Contest Puli-Tabs Dog Mushing Sweepstakes Contest of Skills Fish Derbies Canned SaJmon Classics Federal EIN 92~ - 1'2 - ~' ¥~ Goose Classics Ice Classics King Salmon Classics Mercury Classics IPermit Number P 5~, -c~7F31 Race Classics Rain Classics Salmon Classics Snow Machine Classics ACTiVITES CONDUCTED BY ORGANIZATION Facility Name PhysicaJ Address Game Type Is Fa~lity {~wned I~1 Leased I~ Donated I~1 Owned !~1 Leased I~1 Donated [~1 Owned I~1 Leased I~1 Donated I~1 Owned I~1 Leased I~1 Donated !~1 Owned [~1 Leased I~1 Donated ~ Owned I~1 Leased I~1 Donated ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY VENDOR (pull-tabs are the only games a vendor can conduct) Vendor registration and fee must be attached. Name of Vendor Physical Location Vendor Number ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY OPERATOR Name of Operator Physical Location Game Type(s) Operator's License Number ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY MULTIPLE-BENEFICIARY PERMITTEE IName of MBP Physical Location Game Type(s) MBP Number DEDICATION OF NET PROCEEDS. The organization must plan to use the net proceeds from gaming activities for political, educational, civic, public, charitable, patriotic or religious uses in Alasha. (See statutes and regulations for spocific rules.) In the spo~::e provided, tell how your organization Intends to use the net proceeds from .qamin,q activities. (Be specific) f'o~. ,~,:..,,e.. ~'~o~_~T/~..,~ ,~.4'~ ¢~' ~)[..,,p.~ Y~t'7~ .~,7-1U/rl~_5 , 04-826 (revised 10/98) back We keep you informed Business News Political Events Community Issues ............. ,ss A monthlY' pub - prod, cef Greater Solcl'otna Chamber of Commerce November 1998 The Board of Directors and staff would like to thank everyone who came out to support our 4th Annual Pie Auction. To the pie bakers (far to many to name), the very generous pie buyers, the prize donators, dinner attendees, and all of the many helpers. Thanks to you this was the most successful fundraiser ever! THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING PRIZE CONTRIBUTORS... Affordable New Car Rental Alaska Experience Theatre Alaska Magazine Alaska Powered Parachutes Alaska Railroad Corporation Alaska RoadBuilders Ail-In-One Auto, Inc Alyeska Resort Anchorage Daily News AVIS Rent-A-Car Best Transit Mix Best Western Barratt Inn Birch Ridge Golf Course Black Sheep Yarn & Knitting Machines Blockbuster Video Booths Landscaping BP Exploration Capt. Bligh's Beaver Creek Lodge Cast Away Riverside RV Park Classy Lady Clearwater Air Corporate Express Cozy Cushions Craig Taylor Equipment Rentals Crooked Creek B & B Donna's Country & Victorian Gifts ERA Aviation First National Bank of Anchorage Frames & Things Gallery West Fred Meyer Great Alaskan Bowl Company Green's Karate Handle With Care Packaging Store Harvest Traditions Bakery Healthy Changes/Nautilus Fitness Center High Adventure Air Charters Hilton Anchorage Homer Electric Assoc. K & L Distributors K-WAVE/KPEN/KGTL Kaladi Brothers Coffee Kenai Chrysler Center Kenai Fjords Tours Kenai Peninsula Harley Davidson Kenai Princess Lodge Kruegers Wildlife Adventures KSRM/WHQ/KKIS/KSLD Log Cabin Maps and Books Lynden Transport MACtel, Inc Mackey Lake Co. Major Marine Tours Natron Air Northern Forage Horseback Adventures P.T.I. Communications Paul Gray Video Productions Pepsi PlanltAlaska Prime Data Internet Print Works Super Software R.J.'s Tool Sharpening Reflections Alaska Riverside House Roy Mullin Photography Safeway Salmon Run B & B Scent Sations Sears Roebuck & Company Silver Fox Slippers Soldotna "Y" Chevron Soldotna Florist Spenard Builders Supply Stephans Tool Rental & Sales, inc. Stylistix Hair Team Superstructures Sweeney's Clothing Tesoro The Chase Is Over The Clean Monkey The Fishin Hole The Fitness Place Tustumena Lodge Udelhoven Oilfield System Services Zeny's Design Hair Studio ...thanks to those who contributed their time, energy, expertise and creativity: Decoration Committee' Sammie Cole, Terry Coval, Nichole Polzin, Barbara Ruckman, Diana Spann and the SoHi Cheerleaders, Auctioneers' Norm & Barb Blakeley, Caterers- the Sterling Area Senior Citizens, Bar: B.J.'s, Entertainment: Wes, Dave & Matt, Helpers' Rik and Donna Bucy for their assistance at the ticket table, the SoHi Cheerleaders & Coaches along with George Stein, Damean Polzin and Reshawna North for serving, waiting on, and cleaning up. FOLLOWING i'¢IE~,~BERS .~NE~.JVED THEi~ ~E.~BE-,,~I~ DU~R/NG THE D~OI~;TH OF OCTOBER Alaska Employment Service Alaska Fishing Adventures Alaskan Dream Bed & Breakfast Central Emergency Services Choice Realty, Inc. Clearwater Air Crooked Creek Bed & Breakfast Doors/VVindows, Unlimited Eagle's Nest Bed-N Breakfast Healthy Changes/. Nautilus Fitness Center Insurance Connection K-Beach Stor Mcr Lancaster Enterprises Longmere Lakeside Bed & Breakfast Mykel's Restaurant/Soldotna Inn New Englander on the Kenai Ocean Shores Motel Peninsula Oilers Baseball Club, Inc. "" P~.ime Data Internet Ron's Alaska Lodge Shine-Brite Janitorial and Carpet Cleaning Silver Salmon Creek Lodge SoHi PTSA Renaissance Sterling Area Senior Citizens Tacklebuster Halibut Charters Unocal Alaska Resources TH. MNK YOU -FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT SHOP & SKATE FREE DAYS On December 19 and January 2, from 1:30pm to 4:00pm the Soldotna Chamber Merchants Committee will be hosting free skate days at Alaska's Great Skate roller rink. Participating merchants will purchase packets of tickets to give to customers so that they can shop while their children skate for free. Merchants will be listed in all Skate & Shop promotional materials, if you are interested in participating, give us a call and we'll fill you in on the details. ~O~O SHOP 1998 Christmas Ornaments Soldoma ~go Hats Soldoma ~go T-shi~s Soldoma Logo Sweatshi~s ~ I / ~as~ Mint Med~lions ~~ ~fler ~us~ - ~ll itams sold in tha Soldotna Visitor Gantar ara ex~lusiva. .......... ' ,. :~i ................... -.:.:... <,., . ................................ <; ........................................................... 3oidotna Chamber/Visitor information Center over 9,500 hits since July I, 1997 Being linked to the City of Soldotna, the Soldotna Police Depa~ment, the World Chamber of Commerce, Alaska's Kenai Peninsula Resource Ne~ork, the Anchorage Convention & Visitor Bureau, the Alaska Tourism Marketing Council, Alaska Visitor Association, the Kenai Peninsula Info Net, the Kenai Peninsula Tourism Marketing Council, and the Milepost has assisted in making it even easier to find your business listing on the internet. As you know, not only does eve~ member get a free alphabetical and categorical listing on the chamber page, but you aisc have the option to enhance your listing with a narrative, link your home page to the chamber's page, and if you don't have a web page to link, we have someone who can build one for you. CHECK OUT THE ENCLOSED WEB PAGE INSERT FOR ALL OF THE DETAILS In October, more than half of the visitor 200 inquiries that the Chamber office responded to made contact via e-mail and through the web page. Please notify us immediately when there are any changes to your membership information. We want to make sure people can reach you in this fast-paced world of the information highway, Arctic Web Publishing Kasilof Medical Transcription Long's Kenai River Retreat Bobbi Manning Stephanie & Bill Covert George Long 477 Lilly Drive PO Box 892 778 Thicket Soldotna, AK 99669 Kasiiof, AK 99610 Houston, TX 77079 260-3996 260-7575 260-7693 Office Tach, Inc. Darrell McLevish 10805 Kenai Spur Hwy. Kenai, AK 99611 283-5855 Krueger's Wildlife Adventures Tom or Mark Krueger PO Box 3198 Soldotna, AK 99669 262-2538 Polar Campground Douglas Hawkinson PO Box 571 Sterling, AK 99672 262-7877 ~ Kachemak Bay Transit Soldotna Animal Hospital ~ Rich Simms .~ _ Tim Bowser, DVM · PO Box 1735 ~ 42479 Sterling Hwy. i Homer, AK 99603 --'-'-Ir'- Sterling, AK 99672 i 235-3795 260-7851 . I KEYNOTE SPEAKERS: Mark Standley, Education Executive, Apple Computers ~ TOPIC: Electronic Coffage Industries in Alaska ~ Sam Dickie, V.P., NBA TOPIC: Your Business & The Year 2000, A guide to Y2K Readiness EXHIBITORS & PRESENTERS: jif you have not returned membership update form to the Arctic Web Publications Peninsula Internet ~chamber office, please do so as HiSpeed Gear Richard DeMello ~~ ........... ~ soon as possible. We want to be ~~ ~?~.~ I ~sure and have your current Internet Alaska & Mike Arnold ~~ ~. ~;~;~. ~ business. If you did not receive MicroAge Touch Alaska ~~~ ~ ~ ~ the member update form or if you .ADULT.S' :~ ~ 00 '..-~~~?' ; have any quesbons, please call ~~;:~::'~ .... : the chamber office at 262-9814 . ~TUDEXiT~,. ~,~/c EN1OR, C',T;2ENS' .~3.~0 ~ ~rouE~t to ~o~ ~ t~e ~e~ 2e~~ ~o~o~ 5c~oo[~t., 5o~ot~ ~. 3TUDENTS HONORED ~N! N 0i The Soldotna Chamber feels that The Kenai Peninsula Just name the new Soldotna these exceptional students Independent Living Center would like Chamber of Commerce Puli-Tab dese~e special recognition, to include your business in a listing of Store. To enter, stop by the new store Skyview Senior, Ben McGar~; facilities that are accessible to persons at the old Beluga Realty location (at SoHi Senior, Elisabeth Schirmers; with disabilities. This listing will be the "Y") and put your suggested name and Soldotna Middle School 8th included on our Web-Site which is linked with travel and tourism companies that in the box. All entries must be turned grader, Stephanie McDougal. On into the "new puli tab store" by the third luncheon of the month cater to those with a disabili~. To be included, a site review is November 14, 1998. they are presented with a necessa~ to confirm accessibili~. This ~Store hours are' certificate and a meal. We would review can be scheduled at your Monday through Saturday, like to thank the Bank of America convenience. 9:00am - 11:00pm for continuing to sponsor the For more information call Jim Sundays 10'00am - 7'00pm Student of the Month Brady at the Homer office of the ILC at program. 235-7911. i November t !November !November i 1 ~ ~ovomber I I I I ~OVEMBER CHAMBER LUNCHEON CALENDAR ."' E~,.,IDE HOUS,-- TUESDAY ~ HOON i-xiV "'~ '- I I 3 John Dahlgren, Superintendent of 8choo15 10 Catherine Cassidy, Kenai Watershed Forum 17 Lt. Woodle, USCG Marine Safety Detachment 24 Shana & Doug Loshbaugh, Journalists City of Kenai Mayor John Williams 210 Fidalgo Ave. Kenai, AK 99611 BULK RATE U.S. Postage PAID Permit No 5 Soldotna, AK HAPPY THANKSGIVING Newsletter printed cou~esy of The Copy Works, Overland Street, Ste. #102, Kenai AK 99669, Z83-6503 i President Past President Vice President Sec./Treas. 1998 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mike Sweeney Ken Lancaster Jr. Norman Blakeley Linda Parker Richard Brown Rik Bucy Sammie Cole Terry Coval Linda Kuiper Michael Mishou Dan Mortenson Barbara Ruckman Diana Spann III I Sweeney's Clothing Lancaster Enterprises Alaska Trading Company Kenai Peninsula Food Bank Soldotna Historical Society Kenai River Sportfishing Association SouthCentral Title K-WAVE/KPEN/KGTL Radio TransAlaska Title Copyworks & Peninsula Market Place Four D Carpet One Superstructures, Inc. MACtel Cellular Systems 262-5916 260-3575 262-6100 262-3111 262-9322 260-2200 262-4494 283-7423 262-5708 283-6503 262-9181 262-5888 262-3500 Executive Director Justine Polzin ; Office Assistant Office Manager Kimberly Bumgarner Randi Smith Soldotna Chamber ...................... Fax .............................................. E-Mail' info@SoidotnaChamber, com Web Page: www. SoldotnaChamber. com 262-9814 262-3566 '/~ ~~ $~ ~; ;irst Hational Bani[ o~ Anchorage A periodic publication of the Resource Development Council, Inc. AFA files amendment to TLM P lawsuit Complain't points out flaws The Alaska Forest Association in October filed an amendment to its lawsuit against the Forest Service over the 1997 revision of the Tongass Land Management Plan, according to Executive Director Jack Phelps. Joining with AFA as co-plaintiffs in the action are Southeast Conference, the Ketchikan Gateway Borough, the City of Wrangell, the City of Coffman Cove, the Metlakatla Indian Community and Concerned Alaskans for Resources and the Environment (CARE). Citing the devastating impact on the socioeconomic conditions of Southeast Alaska timber dependent communities as the reason for com- munities and organizations joining with AFA, Phelps said, "implementa- tion of the revised TLMP and the lack of a sufficient economic supply of timber from the Tongass continues to have a major impact on the viabil- ity of the Southeast Alaska timber industry and its timber dependent communities." Phelps noted deficiencies in the Forest Service's socioeconomic ~!r analysis as contributing to the agency's decision to set an insuffi- cient annual timber harvest level. 1 "As ~ a direct consequence of (Continued to page 4) Less than 400.000 acres of the Tongass have been harvested in the past 90 years, that's only 4 % of the 9.5 million forested acres in America's largest national forest. Tongass harvests continue to fail Job losses pile up as logging hits new iow The timber industry is continuing to claw and fight for its survival in the nation's largest national forest in the wake of chronic timber supply short- ages that have sent timber harvests to record lows and job losses to all-time highs. The amount of timber available for harvest in recent years has plummeted from a past annual average of more than 400 million board feet/imbf! to less than 150 mbf-- a 66 percent reduction. And this year the harvest is even lower. aggravating job losses and economic hardship on Southeast Alaska families and timber-dependent communities. Industry employment has declined 65 percent since 1990. Under the new Tongass Land Management Plan, the U.S. Forest Service can sell up to 267 mbf of timber annually, a reduction of almost 50 percent from the harvest ceiling under t. he previous plan. But as of September, the Forest Service had offered (Continued to page 4) Message from the EXecutive Di rect°r by Ken Freeman Arctic Power still moving full steam ahead Arctic Power held its 6th annual meeting in Anchorage recently focus- ing on the existing need to open the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wild- life Refuge to oil and gas exploration and development. Arctic power started in 1991 as a non-profit, grassroots or- ganization committed to securing con- gressional and presidential approval to open ANWR. Since its creation, Arctic Power has conducted an aggressive grassroots and lobbying effort in Wash- ington and in targeted states across the country. Alaska's Congressional delegation has made opening ANWR a priority and was able to win Congres- sional approval in 1996. Unfortunately the President's signature is not forth- coming. Recent numbers from a U.S. Geo- logical Survey assessment indicate the Resource Review is the official periodic publica- tion of the Resource Development Council (RDC), Alaska's largest privately funded nonprofit eco- nomic development organization working to de- velop Alaska's natural resources in an orderly manner and to create a broad-based, diversified economy while protecting and enhancing the envi- ronment. Executive Committee Officers President Allen Bingham Sr, Vice President ........................ Jim Branch Vice President ............................ Robert Stiles Secretary ...................................... Uwe Gross Treasurer .......... · ' John StUrgeon Past President .. Scott Thorson .. . · · Staff EXecutive Director' '~ Ken Freeman DePuty Director Carl R. Portman · Finance/Membership, .......... Steven Dougherty SPecial ASSistant.,:,, .... ,..,,, ......... ,.Tadd Owens RDC, is located at 121' W. Fireweed, Suite 250, Anchor- ageiAK 99503, (907) 276,0700. Fax: 276-3887. Materialin thiS publication may be reprinted without permission provided' appropriate credit is given. RDC's e-rnail address: resources @ akrdc.org Writer & Editor Carl Portman .......... ,, , Page 2 / RESOURCE REVIEW / November 1 998 "1002 Area" holds almost seven billion barrels of oil more than previously thought. That puts estimates of how much oil there may be under the coastal plain in line with how much oil has been extracted from Prudhoe Bay since 1977. With continued pressure and a new President, Alaskans are hopeful this new information will help trigger the opening of ANWR. Rising oil imports and a declining rate of U.S. production weigh heavily in favor of exploration and development of the coastal plain, as does the support from North Slope residents, many of whom have visited Washington to tell their stow. Now more than ever, Arctic Power needs our help. Both local and national environmental groups continue to vig- orously oppose opening ANWR. The Wilderness Society, for example, is working toward adding 100 million acres to Alaska's existing 57 million acres of federally-designated Wilderness. One tactic is to name ANWR as one of the nation's "most endangered wildlands." The Brainerd Foundation has awarded $80,000 to the U.S. public Interest Research Group Education Fund in Washington, D.C., to conduct a national oil company accountability campaign to compliment efforts to per- manently close ANWR to petroleum development. And a band of Canadian artists and musicians are trekking after the Porcupine Caribou herd in the hopes of creating a campaign to show oil de- velopment as a force that will destroy wildlife and Native culture. These are only a few examples of the efforts underway to lock up ANWR. The opportunity for opening ANWR could be very close. The outcome of the next presidential election will be very telling. In the meantime, it is cri*' cai we support Arctic Power's efforts, maintain a strong constituency, as well as the support of key senators and congressmen. Keeping Arctic Power strong in the interim is necessary to our success in the long term. If you are not a member of Arctic Power, please call them at 274-2697. Your membership dollars are a wise investment in the future of Alaska. Pipeline would run furl if ANWR opens If oil development is allowed in ANWR and NPR-A and mean reserve estimates are found, and if 50 percent of the estimated 30 billion barrels of heavy oil in place could be recovered, the trans- Alaska pipeline could be running at rates of 2.2 million barrels per day-- above the peak hit in the 1980s -- for two decades next century, and would still be running at rates of more than 1 million barrels a day until almost mid century. The esti- mates combine current production, an- nounced development and estimates of heavy oil in place, along with the mean U.S. Geological Survey estimates of undiscovered conventional oil across the entire North Slope. The Coastal Plain of ANWR. The estimates were presented at the Department of Energy's Alaska heavy oil workshop in Girdwood this past summer. Thoughts from the President by Allen Bingham Alaska Resources 2000 focuses on challenges, opportunities and prospects for Alaska industry RDC's 19th Annual Conference, "Alaska Resources 2000: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Prospects is quickly approaching. This top-notch conference will be held Thursday and Friday, November 19-20 at the Anchorage Sheraton Hotel. RDC is experiencing a strong response to this year's event in terms of advance registrations, an impressive list of corporate sponsors and a sold- out exhibit arena. RDC's Program Committee, co-chaired by Executive Committee members Bob Stiles and Elizabeth Rensch, has put together a solid program with knowledgeable speakers to examine internal opportunities, external challenges and future prospects facing Alaska industry at the new millennium. The two-day conference is RDC's largest event of the year, attracting several hundred influential Alaskans from across the state, including resource industry and Native corporation executives, state legislators, federal, state and local government officials, educators and the press. The convention provides an excellent opportunity for RDC members to join their peers in exploring the most vital issues and trends facing Alaska Iindustry. Alaska Rosources 2000 has a multi- industry focus, examining issues impacting not just one industry, but all of our state's resource industries- fishing, tourism, mining, oil and gas. Common issues transcending each industry are explored so our members can work together more effectively toward the RDC goal of sensible and progressive resource development. The conference will open with Alaska's 1999 Economic Forecast, followed by a comprehensive look at the state's new industrial module- building industry. Emerging trends shaping oil, gas, timber and fisheries will also be addressed. Thursday afternoon's program will focus on major regulatory issues, in- cluding Essential Fish Habitat, the President's new Clean Water Action Plan and the impact of State permitting fees on industry. Federal, state and private sector officials will deliver vary- lng perspectives on these issues. Friday will open with a thorough update on the prospects for an Alaska North Slope LNG project, as well as a general overview of the impressive growth in Alaska's mining industry. Native corporation leaders will also speak Friday morning on new direction and opportunities for development on Native lands. RDC's conference will conclude with an extended keynote luncheon fea- turing Steffen Palko, Vice Chairman and President of Cross Timbers Oil Company and Barbara Griffiths, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter- national Finance and Development. Ms. Griffiths will address the challenges of economic recovery in the Pacific Rim while Mr. Palko will spotlight his company's interests in Alaska and else- where. Don't miss this networking opportunity and the cutting-edge information needed to respond to rapid change. In the current economic climate, the bonds established and the information exchanged at this conference makes a difference. Inlet fish pristine, EPA study oncludes Cook Inlet salmon, halibut and clams are as pristine as ever tested, according to a recent study conducted by the Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA). "The seafood samples in Cook Inlet show some of the lowest levels of contami- nation that we've ever seen in sampling done throughout the country," said Rick Albright of the EPA's Alaska office. "These are some of the cleanest fish we've seen." The EPA collected a variety of fish and plant samples last summer near the Native villages of Seldovia, Tyonek? Port Graham and Nanwalek. The samples were collected next to villagers so that the food studied in the lab would reflect what is served on the dinner table. The Minerals Management Service recently reported the results of another study that showed there has been no increases in sediment contaminants in Cook Inlet since oil operations began there in the early 1960s. That study focused on the outer zones of the Inlet. It was conducted at the urging of several environmental groups after previous research in the Inlet had come up with insignificant levels of contaminants when compared to background levels of the same compounds naturally found in the sediment. November 1998 / RESOURCE REVIEW / Page 3 Tongass loggers see lower harvests (Continued from page 1) substantially less than the new lower limit and much of what has been offered is either uneconomic to cut or is tied up in challenges filed by environmental groups. The lack of a stable, dependable timber supply, coupled with the Forest Service's inability to offer sales that are economic to harvest, has frustrated the industry and damaged prospects for a new generation of value-added facili- ties in the region. Environmentalists, however, claim supply is not the problem and that many Forest Service offerings beg for a buyer. In reality, industry demand for economically-viable timber sales is strong. The real problem is that most of this year's offerings are deficit sales, mean- ing the composition and design of the offerings resulted in costs exceeding projected revenues. For example, the Forest Service's own estimates showed purchasers would lose about $9 million if they bought those offerings. Of 120 mbf offered in September, one sale- a 0.8 mbf offering- was economic. 1998 has been an especially bad year for the Southeast timber industry. The Forest Service told industry it would provide approximately 249 mbf of tim- ber for sale by September. However, as the year progressed, the agency low- ered its target to 208 mbf, and by the end of September, only 187 mbf was offered, 120 mbf in that month alone. Of the 187 mbf offered, only 21 mbf was sold. Qf the volume sold, only half is available as the remainder is tied up in environmental lawsuits. Southeast loggers say there are at least seven measures the Forest Ser- vice can take to improve the economics of its timber sales: more timber should be accessed per mile of road building; more temporary roads should be built as opposed to expensive permanent roads; sales at remote sites should be larger to reduce fixed costs; high-cost logging, including helicopter yarding and selective tree harvest, should only be required when it is economic to do so; utilization standards should be revised Tongass harvests are planned on a 100- year rotation. Natural regeneration is so abundant that many new trees quickly replace the harvested forests. Many areas require thinning after 15 years. to avoid high-cost, Iow-value cutting practices; the Forest Service should apply cost-benefit analysis to costly tim- ing restrictions placed on Log Transfer Facilities and a small percentage of log exports should be considered in some cases to eliminate a timber sale deficit. Industry insiders say the Forest Service should be encouraged to pro- duce timber sales that are economic and redesign uneconomic offerings that received no bids. Given what's left inside the existing timber supply pipeline, industry expects to harvest about 150 mbf of timber in 1999. Moreover, appeals to TLMP are expected to be settled sometime next year, providing some certainty to the timber supply. As a devastating 1998 draws to a close, trees continue to grow, fish run healthy and wildlife thrive, but will there ever be peace in the Tongass? Alaska's congressional delegation is hopeful that it will get a commitment to secure enough timber from the For- est Service to support a new modern timber industry in Southeast Alaska and bring another major wood processing plant to the region. AFA lawsuit targets TLMP (Continued from page 1) these, deficiencies, timber communities in Southeast Alaska are experiencing major dislocations, declining revenues and increased social costs," Phelps said. The amended complaint points out many of the flaws in the Forest Service's socioeconomic analysis. AFA's original complaint, filed in August, alleges that the Forest Service violated six federal laws in its revision of TLMP, including provisions of the Tongass Timber Reform Act of 1990 (TTRA). The Forest Service also violated its own planning regulations at several points in the revision process, according to the AFA lawsuit. "By refusing to follow the law and its own planning regulations when developing the new Tongass Land Management Plan, the Forest Service was able to remove so much commercial forest land from the tim- ber base that it is no longer able to follow the clear intent of Congress to sell enough timber to satisfy market demand and meet the needs of Alaska's timber industry," Phelps said. "Standards and guides relating to the Plan's wildlife viability strategy are so unreasonable and restrictive and so limit the agency's discretion that it is exceptionally difficult for the Forest Service to offer sales that are economic to harvest." Phelps said AFA's appeal and its lawsuit point out that these stan- dards and guides were illegally adopted since they were added to the Plan only when the Record of Decision was released and were not subject to public comment and de- bate during the planning process. The timber industry has lost two- thirds of the direct jobs it had when (Continued to page 7) Page 4 / RESOURCE REVIEW / November 1998 Drill advances oil spill readiness BP drill is largest ever conducted in Alaska To help prevent and prepare for a major oil spill, BP conducted a huge six- day drill in September that included Prince William Sound communities and more than 600 individuals from 65 organizations. Participants from 12 states and four countries took part in the drill, the largest ever conducted in Alaska. In conjunction with the U.S. Coast Guard, the State of Alaska, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company and ARCO Alaska, BP launched a very real attack on a simulated oil spill in the Sound. "Our goal was to demonstrate and enhance our response capabilities should another spill occur...despite all bf the preventive measures we've implemented in the past decade," said Richard Campbell, President of BP Exploration (Alaska), inc. BP crafted a worst-case scenario to test its ability to respond to a spill surpassing the 1989 event in volume and potential impacts. With the involve- "Over the course of six days, we set a new standard for off spill preparedness and reinforced our commitment to make Prince William Sound's tanker transportation system the safest in the world." - Richard Campbell, President, BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. ment and expertise of regulators, gov- ernment officials, industry partners and the people of Prince William Sound, BP mobilized an aggressive, coordinated and cooperative response. "Over the course of six days, we set a new standard for oil spill prepared- ness and reinforced our commitment to make Prince William Sound's tanker transportation system the safest in the Hundreds of participants crowded into the Valdez Civic Center for the spill drill. Because of its size and scope, it was classified by the U.S. Coast Guard as a Spill of National Significance (SONS). The U.S. Coast Guard participated in the on-waterbooming operations with its vessel operated skimming system. The drill received attention from high-ranking officials, including Coast Guard Commandant Admiral James Loy. world," Campbell said. Since 1989 the industry has initi- ated a tanker escort system and sta- tioned a rescue tug at the entrance to the Sound. A pair of state-of-the-art tractor tugs have been ordered, as well as improved tanker transit procedures. In addition, the Coast Guard has initi- ated a new ship tracking system. A recent study by regulators, the industry and the Prince William Sound Regional citizens Advisory Council con- cluded these initiatives have signifi- cantly reduced the risk of a major spill in the Sound. A major objective of the exercise was logistics, including the physical procurement and deployment of suffi- cient out-of-region oil spill response resources. A second part of the exer- cise was to test the ability of a Unified Command consisting of state and fed- eral officials and the responsible party to coordinate an effective spill response. The scenario played out in the drill centered around a BP-chartered tanker which ran aground on the north shore of Montague Island, spilling more than 307,000 barrels. Alyeska immediately launched an initial response with equip- ment and personnel located in Prince William Sound, while BP activated its worldwide response network to pro- cure additional resources. By the third day of the drill, the scenario called for the deployment of 700 vessels, of these about 200 were skimmers, 400 were fishing vessels and 100 were barges with waste storage capacity of about 4.5 million barrels. November 1998 / RESOURCE REVIEW / Page 5 Interior to move ahead with N PR-A leasing While disappointed 'that much of the highest prospective acreage in the National Petroleum Reserve- Alaska (NPR-A) will be unavailable for oil and gas leasing, the Resource Development Council applauded Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt's decision to move forward with a lease sale in the petroleum reserve. "The Record of Decision is a positive step forward in renewing oil and gas leasing in NPR-A," said RDC Executive Director Ken Freeman. "RDC now encourages the Bureau of Land Management to move forward as expeditiously as possible with the scheduling of a lease sale." Freeman noted that October's announcement fell short of RDC's preference for opening the entire 4.6 million acre study area to leasing with appropriate stipulations to protect sensitive areas, but he emphasized that proceeding with a lease sale represents significant progress toward someday tapping a portion of the region's oil and gas potential. "We are pleased the Secretary did not make any permanent withdrawals from the study area," Freeman said. RDC believes oil and gas. leasing, exploration and development can take place in all areas of NPR-A without adverse impacts to the environment, wildlife and subsistence uses. With more than 30 years of experience on Alaska's North Slope, the industry has demonstrated it has the ability to operate in an environmentally-sensitive manner. The Record of Decision opens 87 percent of the study area to leasing, but the highest prospective areas along the coast and Teshekpuk Lake are unavailable. RDC supports Alpine pipelines RDC recently urged the Alaska State Pipeline Coordinator's Office to approve right-of-way leases for pipelines associated with the development of ARCO's new Alpine oil field. RDC noted the pipelines would have only a very small footprint and would be built by crews using ice roads. Pictured above is an ice road built last winter for the Alpine project. Page 6 / RESOURCE REVIEW / November 1998 EPA proposes changes to water list RDC calls for removal of Log Transfer Facilities from impaired list The Resource Development Coun- cil has taken strong objection to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed changes to the Alaska 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies. EPA has proposed including on Alaska's 303(d) list active or inactive log transfer facilities (LTF) where bark accumulations exceed the one-acre zone of deposit (ZOD). RDC has urged the EPA to care- fully analyze the implications of its pro- posed changes to Alaska's 303(d) list and has specifically asked that eleven proposed LTFs be removed. "This criterion for automatic listing raises a myriad of policy questions and gives us great concern for what ap- pears to be a new direction for EPA that could impact many of our members," said RDC Executive Director Ken Free- man. While it is EPA's job to review the list, Freeman noted the agency's over- sight is secondary to the jurisdiction of the state in governing its waters. Past EPA policy allows each state discretion in the formation of impaired waterbodies recommendations so that a state's 303(d) list complements its own water quality programs. States are given the prim'aw role of listing a waterbody be- cause of potential economic impact to individuals, companies and communi- ties. "Automatically listing any LTF which exceeds the ZOD does not allow the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation to exercise its discretion on a site-specific basis," Freeman sair' "Without site-specific analysis, it is im possible to determine whether bark deposition beyond the one-acre limit is harmful to the environment." Stevens obtains King Cove road deal by Tadd Owens Senator Ted Stevens, Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, ended months of controversy regard- lng a proposed road through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge to connect Cold Bay and King Cove by forging a compromise solution with the Clinton Administration. The proposed road was the most contentious of several riders attached to the appropriations bill by the Alaska congressional delegation. Environmen- tal groups objected vigorously to any road through a federally-designated Wilderness and President Clinton threatened to veto the entire spending package if the riders were not removed. Stevens, promising to take the is- sue all the way to the President if nec- essary, was able to secure a $38 million )compromise. The deal authorizes sev- eral projects in and around King Cove, including $20 million for a road, marine terminal and ferry, $15 million for im- provements to the King Cove airstrip to allow jet ambulances to take-off and land, and $2.5 million to provide a full- time doctor and nurse, as well as state- of-the-art telemedicine and telecom- Senator Ted Stevens has secured $37 million to fund the King Cove road, a marine terminal and improvements to the community's airport and clinic. munication improvements to the King Cove medical clinic. The compromise steers the road away from the federally-designated Wilderness lands inside the Izembek r. efuge, but requires a marine ferry to make the final connection south of Kinzarof Lagoon to Cold Bay. Stevens said road advocates did not believe they were asking too much to build a road through a portion of Wilderness already crisscrossed with old jeep trails. The issue reached a peak in Octo- ber when the Senate voted 59-38 in favor of a pro-road bill by Senator Frank Murkowski. National environmental groups lobbied hard against the bill, but King Cove residents visiting the Capitol effectively countered the opposition. Alaska delegation wins commitment for more timber The Alaska Congressional delegation has obtained a commitment from the Forest Service to begin discussions this fall on a dependable timber supply to support a new veneer mill in Southeast Alaska. To help the Forest Service carry out its pledge, the delegation has won an addi- tional $12.5 million of funding in the agency's FY 99 budget to increase the amount of itimber offered to loggers. "We've fought for months to get a com- mitment to get enough timber to support a new modern timber industry in Southeast and it appears we now have that commit- ment," said Senator Frank Murkowski. AFA the TTRA was passed. That law was supposed to have adjusted the balance between timber interests and preserva- tionist goals. Phelps, however, pointed out that TLMP completely destroys that balance by placing every other use of the forest ahead of timber manage- ment. "Under TLMP, the Tongass will no longer be a multiple use forest in the historic sense of that term." The new plan sets an annual har- vest limit of 267 million board feet. a reduction of almost 50 percent of the allowable harvest limit under the old plan. According to the new plan, 267 mbf can be offered for harvest each year without compromising any other value in the forest. By the end of August, the Forest Service had offered only 67 mbf for harvest, 200 mbf less than projected and 390 mbf less than the historical average. The Alaska congressional delega- tion has won a pledge from Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman to increase the amount of timber in the planning "pipeline" by up to 25 percent next year, remaining well within the goals of per- mitting up to 267 mbf of timber harvest under the new plan. November 1998 / RESOURCE REVIEW / Page 7 · BusinessLink: PC-based cash management system · BusinessLink-by-Phone: touch-tone federal tax payment system ;-o BusinesslManager®: cash flow management · Business checking · Business loans · Direct Deposit · Lock Box services · Escrow and Collections In Alaska, changing seasons bring good reasons to get back to business. And that brings many Alaskan businesses to First National Bank. Visit our booth at the annual conference and find out what we can do for your business. You'll see why Alaska's businesses turn to First National Bank. 777-4FNB (4362) or 1-800-777-4FNB (4362) Friendly Experienced. Alaskan. EQUAL HOUSING LENDER Resource Development Council 121 W. Fireweed, Suite 250 Anchorage, AK 99503 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Page 8 / RESOURCE REVIEW / November 1998 Mayor John Williams City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Ave., Suite 200 Kenai AK 99611 Bulk Rate U.S. Postage PAID Anchorage, AK Permit No. 377 TESTIMONY SIGN-IN SHEET