Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-05-17 Planning & Zoning Packet - Work SessionAGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MAY 17, 2015 – 6:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 210 FIDALGO AVE., KENAI, AK 99611 http://www.kenai.us A. Call to Order B. Introduction and Presentation of Goals and Objectives for 2016 City of Kenai Comprehensive Plan (City Planner, Matt Kelley and Elizabeth Benson, Planning Consultant) C. Public Comment (Public comment limited to three (3) minutes per speaker; thirty (30) minutes aggregated) D. Planning and Zoning Commission Discussion E. Adjournment All meetings are open to the public and participation is encouraged. Agendas and supporting documents are posted on the City’s website at www.ci.kenai.ak.us. For additional information, please contact the Planning and Zoning Division at 907-283-8235. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 70 May 2016 Rev2 6.1 Background and Introduction The vision statements, goals, and objectives of the draft Imagine Kenai 2030 comprehensive plan (Draft 2013 Plan) have been carried forward into the draft 2016 Kenai Comprehensive Plan. The strategies, priority ranking, and responsible department information have been removed. However, if there are strategies that could be appropriate, they will be used to expand the 2016 Plan objectives/policies section. Public comments during the creation of the Draft 2013 Plan, along with the comments from the April‐May 2016 Town Hall meetings, were used to develop the 2016 Plan. The following table has three columns: Column One includes the Draft 2013 Plan objectives and adds in the applicable Draft 2013 Plan strategies. They are numbered. Column Two identifies the applicable 2003 Plan policies recommended to address public comments. Column Three lists the public comments from the 2016 Town Halls related to each goal and/or objective. Goals are broad statements of the City’s long‐term desired outcomes. Objectives are “operational” guidelines used to determine whether a proposed project or program advances community values expressed in the goals. Action Items: list specific steps the City will take to implement Objectives. Action items may be a one‐time work effort (such as amending the City’s Municipal Codes, or adopting a new plan or regulation) or may be ongoing efforts that are part of the City’s day‐to‐day functions. Chapter 6: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies (Plan Implementation may move to a separate chapter) Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 71 May 2016 Rev2 Goals, objectives and action items are defined in the inset box. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 72 May 2016 Rev2 6.2 Goal 1 – Quality of Life: Promote and encourage quality of life in Kenai. Vision: Kenai is a healthy community that provides for the emotional, physical, economic and spiritual wellbeing of all of its citizens, promotes the health and wellbeing for all age groups, provides opportunities for lifelong learning, and encourages arts and cultural activities. Goal 1.0 – Quality of Life: Promote and encourage quality of life in Kenai. Recommendations for Updating Goal 1: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) Q‐1 Provide a variety of formal and informal educational programs. Q‐2 Ensure that Kenai is a community where people and property are safe. Q‐3 Retain First Peoples heritage in Kenai. Q‐4 Encourage healthy lifestyles by providing outdoor activities. Q‐5 Promote beautification programs in Kenai. Q‐6 Actively provide senior services. Applicable 2003 Policies: City Center and Millennium Square Development (CC) a. CC1 Foster a more compact, intensive mix of private and public uses in the city center. b. CC2 Define a distinctive identity for Kenai’s city center. c. CC5 Update Historic District design standards in the city’s land use regulations. Residential Neighborhood Development (R) a. R2 Promote the siting and design of land uses that are in harmony and scale with surrounding uses. b. R3 Update the subdivision code to include site design standards. Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 1 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address public comments on the quality of life in Kenai including the city center, residential and commercial land uses: 2013 Goal 1 strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Review landscaping requirements for commercial developments and determine if they should be revised.  Consider establishing landscaping requirements in all zoning districts. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 73 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 1: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments Q‐7 Consider nominating the Townsite Historic District (TSH) to the National Register Historic District. Q‐8 Develop strategies to ensure there is adequate affordable housing in Kenai. Q‐9 Provide a wide variety of opportunities for the public to participate in public policy decision‐making. c. R5 Support federal and state agency d. programs that provide affordable housing with low cost energy services. Commercial Land Use Development (CM) a. CM3 Update existing guidelines for commercial development – landscaping, setbacks, parking. b. CM4 and CM5 setbacks, site design, landscaping  Support development of additional senior housing. 2003 Policies:  CC1, CC2, and CC5  R2, R3, and R5  CM3, CM4, and CM5 Comments: Quality of Life too broad a category – not clearly defined. There are many city “centers” – identify and promote them. Continue to support Millennium Square and downtown historic area. Perhaps consider updating the City of Kenai Historic Preservation Plan (2007) and the Historic District Survey Report (1996). Consider adding or removing additional buildings to the Historic Register. Protect the livability and sanctity of residential neighborhoods. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 74 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 1: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments Limit commercial intrusion into residential areas. How can plan address residents that have stated they want Kenai to remain status quo? Others want to move forward. Kenai Peninsula is becoming a “retirement” area. Senior Center serves not just Kenai seniors but those in the region. Seniors made their contribution to this community and the community is what it is today because of the work of seniors. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 75 May 2016 Rev2 6.3 Goal 2 – Economic Development: Provide economic development to support the fiscal health of Kenai Vision: Kenai has a secure economic vitality by being a community that has a wide variety of job opportunities and workforce support and development; by providing a quality of life and financial climate that encourages businesses to start up, expand or relocate to Kenai and by providing a built environment based on standards that sustain long‐term economic viability and growth and that promotes affordable residential and commercial development. Goal 2 ‐ Economic Development: Provide economic development to support the fiscal health of the community. Recommendations for Updating Goal 2: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) ED‐1 Promote opportunities for job security. ED‐2 Implement business‐friendly regulations, taxation and incentives. ED‐3 Recruit specific businesses that are necessary to maintain the local economy. ED‐4 Use regional economic and workforce statistics to match the most suitable type of industry for particular areas and then market these areas. Applicable 2003 Policies: City Center and Millennium Square Development (CC) a. CC2 capitalize on local assets like Kenai River etc to draw businesses b. CC3 create stable, positive climate for private investment in city center Commercial Land Use Development (CM) a. CM1 Promote adaptive reuse of vacant commercial buildings in the city center and along the Kenai Spur Highway. b. CM3 Update existing guidelines for commercial development – landscaping, setbacks, parking c. CM4 before zoning to commercial, consider if use has access to collector or arterial road, access to city services, and that potential conflicts with adjacent non‐commercial uses Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 2 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address public comments on the quality of life in Kenai including the city center, residential and commercial land uses: 2013 Goal 2 Strategies: There are Goal 2 strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Use regional economic and workforce statistics to match the most suitable type of industry for particular areas and then market these areas.  Compete for the siting of large industrial or manufacturing companies by promoting advantages such as transportation, access of developed industrial locations. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 76 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 2: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments ED‐5 Compete for the siting of large industrial or manufacturing companies by promoting advantages such as transportation, access of developed industrial locations. ED‐6 Consider tax incentives/tax relief. Research cost and benefits of reverse taxation or tax deferral for improvements to support business incentives. have been minimized through site design, landscaping, or other appropriate measures. Industrial Land Use (IN) a. IN1 before zoning to industrial, consider if use has access to collector or arterial road, access to city services, that potential conflicts with adjacent non‐industrial uses have been minimized through site design, and that potential hazards from the proposed industrial use have been minimized. b. IN2 Reserve areas zoned for industry for industrial uses.  Consider tax incentives/tax relief. Research cost and benefits of reverse taxation or tax deferral for improvements to support business incentives. 2003 Policies:  CC2 and CC3  CM1, CM3, and CM4  IN1 and IN2 Comments: Continue to support Millennium Square and downtown historic area for tourism, commercial, mixed uses. Focus commercial development in city center(s). Address strip commercial by creating or requiring dual entrances between adjacent commercial parcels along major roads. Review Kenai Peninsula Tourism Marketing Council, Chamber of Commerce, KPEDD, and other sources as needed for updated economic information and forecasts. Use KPEDD on latest data. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 77 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 2: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments Refer to City’s Dipnet Fishery Report for latest information and forecasts for personal use fishery, city dock use. Consider using the concept of planned industrial parks to concentrate multiple industrial uses. Call out additional information for the Kenai Economic Development Strategy (KEDS) Report. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 78 May 2016 Rev2 6.4 Goal 3 – Land Use: Develop land use strategies to implement a forward‐looking approach to community growth. Vision: Kenai implements a forward‐looking approach to community growth and development by establishment of several different zoning districts that reflect the needs of each district; providing commercial, industrial, and residential areas suited to current and probable future growth. Goal 3 ‐ Land Use: Develop land use strategies to implement a forward‐looking approach to community growth and development. Recommendations for Updating Goal 3: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) LU‐1 Review zoning and subdivision codes for present and future land uses. LU‐2 Review future land use map annually to monitor changes in land use. LU‐3 Review siting for oil and gas developments. LU‐4 Review revitalization strategies for the area adjacent to the Bridge Access Road beginning at Millennium Square to the boat landing. LU‐5 Provide a wide variety of opportunities for the public to participate in local land use decisions Applicable 2003 Policies: Residential (R) a. R1 Promote infill of existing, improved subdivision lots. b. R2 Promote the siting and design of land uses that are in harmony and scale with surrounding uses. c. R3 Update the subdivision code to include site design standards. d. R5 Support federal and state agency programs that provide affordable housing with low cost energy services. Commercial (CM) a. CM1 reuse vacant buildings, standards for mixed use b. CM2 Safe, walkable commercial Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 3 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address public comments on the quality of life in Kenai including the city center, residential and commercial land uses: 2013 Goal 3 Strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Review landscaping ordinance to ensure buffers are required to protect neighborhoods.  Encourage creative subdivision design for residential areas.  Amend subdivision code to consolidate access via frontage roads or by shared driveways onto main streets/highways.  Amend subdivision code to require retention of natural vegetation during development. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 79 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 3: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments LU‐6 Review landscaping ordinance to ensure buffers are required to protect neighborhoods. LU‐7 Encourage creative subdivision design for residential areas. LU‐8 Amend subdivision code to consolidate access via frontage roads or by shared driveways onto main streets/highways. LU‐9 Amend subdivision code to require retention of natural vegetation during development. c. CM3 and CM4 setbacks, site design, landscaping. Natural Setting and Open Space (N) a. N1 identify city‐owned and public‐owned lands for appropriate rezoning. b. N3 urban trail and greenbelt system that connects other trail systems. Trail and greenbelt plan. c. N4 prohibit development in natural hazard areas. See N4 for details. d. N5 ensure access e. N6 locate parks near schools, residential not served now. Community Facilities and Services (CF) and Transportation (T) a. CF1 Coordinate installation of basic public infrastructure (roads, sewer, water, and drainage) with development. b. T1 Coordinate transportation improvements with the city’s land use plan recommendations, capital improvements program, Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities transportation plans, 2003 Policies:  R1, R2, R3 and R5  CM1, CM2, and CM3  N1, N3, N4, N5, and N6  CF1 and T3 Comments: Protect the livability and sanctity of residential neighborhoods. Limit commercial intrusion into residential areas. Buffer residential from commercial and industrial. (buffer commercial from encroaching residential?) Continue to support Millennium Square and city center. There are many city “centers” – identify and promote them. Create Historic District. Acknowledge and plan for potential of AKLNG development – be prepared. Look at both regional transportation issues and local transit. Create Industrial Parks where land uses are concentrated, infrastructure and access available Use recently updated Airport Master Plan. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 80 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 3: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments the Kenaitze Indian Tribe, and Salamatof Tribal Council. c. T2 Transportation improvements needed to serve new developments shall be in place at the time new development impacts occur. d. T3 Ensure a pattern of connecting streets and blocks that allows people to get around easily by foot, bicycle or car when approving new developments, both commercial and multifamily. e. T5 Support implementation of the City’s Kenai Airport Master Plan Capital Improvements Program. Use recently created Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan. Implement measures/recommendations? Connectivity between residential areas and between residential and commercial. Safe pedestrian movement Airport major landowner and local and regional industry. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 81 May 2016 Rev2 6.5 Goal 4 ‐ Public Improvements and Services: Provide adequate public improvements and services in Kenai. Vision: Kenai encourages public involvement in decision making; has well‐planned public and institutional facilities that meet the health, education, governmental and social service needs of all citizens; has an integrated efficient and cost‐effective network of utilities and public improvements and is a community where the public feels safe. Goal 4 ‐ Public Improvements and Services: Provide adequate public improvements and services in Kenai. Recommendations for Updating Goal 4: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) PF‐1 Evaluate feasibility/need for public improvements. PF‐2 Maintain existing water and sewer utilities. PF‐3 Consider additional city activities and services. PF‐4 Continue to secure the funding for the Kenai River bluff erosion project. PF‐5 Inventory existing roads and utilities and identify and prioritize upgrades. Applicable 2003 Policies Community Facilities and Services (CF): a. CF1 Coordinate installation of basic public infrastructure (roads, sewer, water, and drainage) with development. b. CF2 when siting and designing a new public facility the city shall determine if facility needed, if demand for services can be met, funding sources to pay for it, CIP. c. CF3 Work with the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District to develop standards for locating new schools during the design of new neighborhoods. d. CF8 Continue mutual cooperation with the Kenai Peninsula Borough Division of Emergency Management for efficient delivery of public safety services (police, fire, EMS) to residents of the City of Kenai. Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 4 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address comments on community facilities. 2013 Goal 4 Strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Continue to secure the funding for the Kenai River bluff erosion project.  Inventory existing roads and utilities and identify and prioritize upgrades. 2003 Policies:  CF1, CF2, CF3, and CF8 Comments: 2013 goal and objectives do not address public safety, education. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 82 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 4: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments Trail connections valued. Pedestrian safety within neighborhoods and adjacent to commercial areas. Future industrial like oil and gas activities (and other industry) needs good infrastructure. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 83 May 2016 Rev2 6.6 Goal 5 ‐ Transportation: Provide transportation systems that are efficient and adequate to serve the regional needs of the community. Vision: Kenai Municipal Airport is a gateway to the Kenai Peninsula and West Cook Inlet; the roads are designed, constructed, and maintained for year‐round use; and the harbor functions as a vital facility for water connection to other areas in the State. Goal 5 – Transportation: Provide transportation systems that are efficient and adequate to serve the regional needs of the community. Recommendations for Updating Goal 5: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) T‐1 Fulfill the Kenai Municipal Airport’s primary mission, “To be the commercial air transportation gateway to the Kenai Peninsula Borough and Cook Inlet.” T‐2 Monitor progress of Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP). T‐3 Establish maintenance and upgrade program for the City’s transportation system. T‐4 Pursue local road projects through annual budget requests from the STIP. T‐5 Inventory city rights‐of‐way, sidewalks, and trails. Applicable 2003 Policies Transportation Policies (T): a. T1 Coordinate transportation improvements with the city’s land use plan recommendations, capital improvements program, Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities transportation plans, the Kenaitze Indian Tribe, and Salamatof Tribal Council. b. T2 Transportation improvements needed to serve new developments shall be in place at the time new development impacts occur. c. T3 Ensure a pattern of connecting streets and blocks that allows people to get around easily by foot, bicycle or car when approving new developments, both commercial and multifamily. Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 5 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address comments on transportation. 2013 Goal 5 Strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Pursue local road projects through annual budget requests from the STIP.  Inventory city rights‐of‐way, sidewalks, and trails.  Prioritize maintenance/upgrades for streets, sidewalks, and trails based on criteria established in city’s maintenance program. 2003 Policies : Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 84 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 5: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments T‐6 Prioritize maintenance/upgrades for streets, sidewalks, and trails based on criteria established in city’s maintenance program. d. T4 Actively pursue design and construction of a Kenai River Bridge Access Road and coastal and bluff trail system  T1, T2, and T3  T4 underway? Comments: Pedestrian safety within and between areas important. Questions on regional transportation system road classifications for arterials, collectors. Transit system important to residents and businesses. Regional transportation system important to commerce. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 85 May 2016 Rev2 6.7 Goal 6 – Parks and Recreation: Ensure that Kenai has excellent parks and recreational facilities and opportunities. Vision: Kenai enhances the quality of life for all citizens through parks and recreational facilities, programs, and community services. Goal 6 ‐ Parks and Recreation: Ensure that Kenai has excellent parks and recreational facilities and opportunities. Recommendations for Updating Goal 6: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) PR‐1 Create greenbelts around the community. PR‐2 Maintain existing recreational opportunities and plan for new parks and recreation improvements. PR‐3 Provide greenbelts along right‐of‐way corridors. PR‐4 Develop a master plan for Parks and Recreation. PR‐5 Implement the Parks and Recreation Trails Plan. Applicable 2003 Policies Community Facilities Policies (CF): a. CF4 criteria for siting parks and recreation facilities – accessible, safe, parking b. CF5 Promote the public/private collaboration for acquisition, development and maintenance of neighborhood parks, youth sports facilities, and recreational areas. c. CF6 Promote joint use of municipal land and facilities. d. CF10 Encourage development of a mutually supportive cluster of diverse residential facilities for seniors near shops, services, activities, and amenities that cater to seniors as well as the community at large. Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 6 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address comments on parks and recreation. 2013 Goal 6 Strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Provide greenbelts along right‐of‐way corridors.  Develop a master plan for Parks and Recreation.  Implement the Parks and Recreation Trails Plan.  Support projects that provide additional quality outdoor and indoor recreation.  Include trails and bicycle paths in funding requests in future transportations plans. 2003 Policies:  CF4, CF5, CF6 and CF10  N1, N2, N3, N6 and N7 Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 86 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 6: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments PR‐6 Support projects that provide additional quality outdoor and indoor recreation. PR‐7 Include trails and bicycle paths in funding requests in future transportations plans. Natural Setting & Open Space (N): a. N1 Revise the conservation zone standards and rezone public lands surplus to Kenai’s future development needs for conservation. b. N2 Explore creation of a Kenai River Gateway/Kuhtnu natural area or park to highlight Kenai’s reputation as a prime recreational access point to the Kenai River. (Kuhtnu is the traditional Kenaitze name for the Kenai River.) c. N3 Pursue long‐term development of an urban trail and greenbelt system that connects the proposed coastal trail and upland bluff trail with links to and through the urban area. d. N6 Locate future community parks near schools and residential areas not yet served by parks. e. N7 Preserve and protect water features such as isolated wetlands, stream corridors, drainage areas, and riparian areas for open space and to enhance water quality. Comments: Goal and Objectives focus on parks and recreation facilities. May need to add something in re other use groups (i.e. seniors, etc.) Consider having separate natural areas and open space objectives/policies like 2003 Plan. Consider creation of two conservation zones – one for natural areas, the other appropriate for some improvements Cross‐reference to 2013 Goal 8 Environmental Resources Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 87 May 2016 Rev2 6.8 Goal 7 ‐ Natural Hazards and Disasters: Prepare and protect the citizens of Kenai from natural hazards and disasters Vision: Kenai has coordinated and proactive public policies, emergency plans and procedures, and educational programs that minimize the risk to the community from natural hazards and disasters. Goal 7 ‐ Natural Hazards and Disasters: Prepare and protect the citizens of Kenai from natural hazards and disasters. Recommendations for Updating Goal 7: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) NH‐1 Implement the Hazard Mitigation Plan strategies. Applicable 2003 Policy: Natural Hazard (N) N4 ‐ Prohibit development in known hazard areas except where no feasible or prudent alternative can be identified. Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 7 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address comments on environmental resources. 2013 Goal 7 Strategy: There is a strategy like the following that could become an objective:  Implement the Hazard Mitigation Plan strategies. 2003 Policy:  NF4 Comments: Support incorporating draft 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan policies. Use the 2003 N4 policy? Provide HMP policies separately? Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 88 May 2016 Rev2 6.9 Goal 8 ‐ Environmental Resources: Protect and enhance the natural resources and environment of the community. Vision: Kenai practices mindful stewardship of the natural resources and the environment to ensure they are protected and enhanced for their viability and values in perpetuity. Goal 8 ‐ Environmental Resources: Protect and enhance the natural resources and environment of the community. Recommendations for Updating Goal 8: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments 2013 Objectives (Applicable Strategies Added) ER‐1 Maintain and improve protection of the Kenai River its beaches, tidelands and wetland areas. ER‐2 Review, and modify as necessary, the City's long‐term plan for management of the annual Personal Use Fishery. ER‐3 Continue to work with the State of Alaska, personal use fishers, commercial fishers, residents, and others to mitigate damages caused by the dipnet fishery. ER‐4 Encourage protection of critical wetlands by obtaining conservation easements. Applicable 2003 Policies: Community Facilities (CF) a. CF4 criteria for siting parks and recreation facilities – accessible, safe, parking Natural Setting and Open Space (N) b. N1 Revise the conservation zone standards and rezone public lands surplus to Kenai’s future development needs for conservation. c. N2 Explore creation of a Kenai River Gateway/Kuhtnu natural area or park to highlight Kenai’s reputation as a prime recreational access point to the Kenai River. (Kuhtnu is the traditional Kenaitze name for the Kenai River.) d. N3 Pursue long‐term development of an urban trail and greenbelt system that connects the proposed coastal trail and Consider incorporating the following 2013 Goal 8 Strategies and the following 2003 Policies to address comments on environmental resources. 2013 Goal 8 Strategies: There are strategies like the following that could be objectives:  Review, and modify as necessary, the City's long‐term plan for management of the annual Personal Use Fishery.  Continue to work with the State of Alaska, personal use fishers, commercial fishers, residents, and others to mitigate damages caused by the dipnet fishery.  Encourage protection of critical wetlands by obtaining conservation easements.  Continue efforts to protect the dunes. Draft 2016 City Kenai Comprehensive Plan 89 May 2016 Rev2 Recommendations for Updating Goal 8: Use 2013 applicable strategies and 2003 Policies Recommendations for Addressing Town Hall Comments ER‐5 Continue efforts to protect the dunes. ER‐6 Increase signage along the bluffs at the mouth of the Kenai River to educate people of the damage caused by climbing the bluffs. ER‐7 Divert public trails away from sensitive salmon spawning streams. upland bluff trail with links to and through the urban area. e. N5 Provide city maintenance of existing rights‐of‐way and easements for public access to beaches. f. N7 Preserve and protect water features such as isolated wetlands, stream corridors, drainage areas, and riparian areas for open space and to enhance water quality.  Increase signage along the bluffs at the mouth of the Kenai River to educate people of the damage caused by climbing the bluffs.  Divert public trails away from sensitive salmon spawning streams. 2003 Policies:  CF4  N1, N2, N3, N5 and N7. Comments: Cross‐reference to 2003 Goal 7: Develop a local system of trails and appropriate access to public lands, and regional trails along arterials that traverse the city. Consider having separate natural areas and open space objectives/policies like 2003 Plan. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 1 April 1, 2016 Rich Koch opened meeting with introductions and overview of today’s meeting agenda. Elizabeth Benson presented purpose of meeting and the proposed approach (guide to how to update Chapters 1-4) for updating the plan. Also gave an overview of the role of planning. Participants offered comments on the proposed approach (guide handed out) and proposed schedule. These were recorded digitally and on flip charts. Participants’ comments from the flip charts are organized below by commenter, topic, and comment. TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Proposed Approach/Guide to Creating a 2016 Plan Elizabeth Benson Reviewed guide for proposed approach to creating 2016 plan. 2013 plan data Henry Knackstedt Use 2013 data. City Council specifically directed that the 2013 data be used in the new plan. EB confirmed that yes we would be using the 2013 data. 2013 plan comments Tim Navarre Use comments from 2013 plan process. Everyone participating in update should get a copy of the draft 2013 plan. EB and MK confirmed that yes we have these comments and handed out copies of the 2013 plan (draft/not adopted). History about 2013 plan effort Bob McIntosh City Council decision not unanimous to used 2013 for update. Public rejected 2013 by referendum. Ken Peterson Some residents have stated they want Kenai to remain static. We need to move forward. We need to keep this perspective in mind from the 2003 plan to the 2011 and 2013 updates, which were moving to the future-ahead. If majority wants to stay static then we need to know. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 2 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Attendance at Town Hall (TH) #1 Richard Kelso People not here today because in the past they participated and the plan didn’t address their concerns. They do not trust the process. Concerned that past TH meeting comments and information doesn’t get lost in the 2016 update process. Use of 2013 Plan Table of Contents (TOC). Tim Navarre Need to clarify that we are using the TOC from the 2013 plan and not the 2003 plan. Yes we are using 2013 TOC. Title of new plan – clarify. Tim Navarre Clarify title of new plan – should it be called “Kenai Plan 2016”? Update? Ken Peterson Call it 2016 Plan Henry Knackstedt Call it 2016 Plan. Clarify that today’s meeting purpose is to review Ch. 1-4 from the 2013 Plan – not on the agenda. Make sure public knows what is being discussed. (Note: public notice did state that Ch. 1-4 2013 Plan would be reviewed). Brian Gabriel Keep title simple – is it to be called 2016 Plan or 2030 Plan? Confusing title. Do we refer to a date in the future like 2030? Or 2025, for example? Agree on a clear title. Use 2013 background except for goals. Bob McIntosh Public interested in general concepts – title should reflect people’s/City Council’s preference and legal input. Concentrate on substance so that it’s not confusing. Response to Ken P.re remaining static: People want the atmosphere in Kenai to be retained. How do we develop economically – e.g. marijuana store? Likes 2013 TOC. Focus on public input. Using 2013 Plan & Previous Katie Quinn (KSRM) There were issues with the land use plan in 2013. MAPTS subdivision the Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 3 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Neighborhood Concerns center of controversy. Plan well and good but what about neighborhood concerns? How are these managed in a plan? EB and MK respond – there are a lot of ways to manage land use. The land use table in a plan is a guide for long term planning. Even if current land uses do not match with proposed uses for that lot/area, a rezone is not forced on that property. 2013 Plan Process & using goals from that plan Richard Kelso 2013 goal Quality of Life very specific – not so in 2003 plan. EB respond – we will look at 2013 goals and 2003 goals at next TH meeting. Jeff Twait Will look at both sets of goals at next meeting. Get back on track and review Chapters 1-4 now. Getting word out to public Tim Navarre Advertise next meeting and invite public to help develop goals. City Council wants both documents here for participants to refer to. Today’s agenda and review of background Chapters 1-4. Tim Navarre EB asks – should we agree to the proposed table/guide approach (heads nod)? What about going through the Chapters 1-4 in detail today? Should we do that? Yes – participants want to go through Chapters 1-4 in 2013 Plan today. Chapters 1-4 2013 Plan – review by section and sub-section Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Elizabeth Benson Referred to Tim’s comment about combining “Kenai’s Community Identity” with Mission Statement sections. 1.2 Goals of the Plan Elizabeth Benson Reviewed this section which summarizes the plan goals. Chapter 6 provides more details on goals. Suggested that goals are broad, that group should look Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 4 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT at 2003 and 2013 goals side by side. Land use goals have to be reviewed again with the public. Add more specifics about public facilities and services. Describe difference between transportation and transit. Describe services city provides and those provided by others such as state, federal government, borough. Describe services city provides and ones they do not (e.g. provided by others such as State, Feds, KBP). Transportation Goal Bob McIntosh City does not have transit system. Senior Center provides some transit. There are CARTS/cabs for local transportation. City can do more to develop regional transportation. Parks & Recreation Goal No comments Natural Hazards Goal Elizabeth Benson & Matt Kelley Integrate new Hazard Mitigation Plan information – new HMP will be available by mid-July 2016. Environmental Resources Goal No comments. General comments on Chapter 1 Introduction Tim Navarre Page 2 and page 5 need to be rewritten/combined to address these two similar topics (e.g. mission statement) Henry Knackstedt 8 goals – do we need any other goals? Broader goals? Are they listed in order of importance? Brian Gabriel Possibility of revisiting this after 2013 Plan Chapter 6 (Goals and Objectives) revised. EB suggest that we consider moving the goals and objectives up in the plan TOC; ahead of Chapter 4 and Land Use. Tim Navarre Page 2 and page 5 need to be rewritten/combined to address these two similar topics (e.g. mission statement) Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 5 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT 1.3 How to use this Plan This section will be adjusted as the plan TOC is changed. Section 2 City of Kenai 2.1 Powers of the City Elizabeth Benson Powers of the City – comments on the planning and zoning commission section. Verify with administration re any changes. Tim Navarre Suggested combining “Kenai’s Community Identity” with Mission Statement sections (pages 1 and 5). 2.2 Planning and Zoning Commission Bob McIntosh Add more information about P&Z responsibilities and how comments by the public are addressed in their decisions. Do neighbors have chance to affect decision? For example, pot store in neighborhood and how should P&Z handle this action? Elizabeth Benson Caution that because P&Z and CC members are here today, we should not discuss project. It is still in the review process and there are individual property rights in question. Jeff – Jeff Twait P&Z apples conditions of approval to address potential impacts/concerns. Ken Peterson There is an appeal process of 15 days to the City Board of Adjustment. Bob McIntosh Commissioner comments reflect the need for public input on the Plan. Public needs to know the importance of the plan. 2.3 Context for Planning Tim Navarre Assumes if the City Administration wants changes they would be presented. Elizabeth Benson Land use table will be updated to reflect public input and previous plans. Henry Knackstedt Airport Master Plan to be completed soon – need to incorporate that information. Elizabeth Benson We will use Airport Master Plan, new Millennium Square Feasibility Study, HMP and other documents to update the table. The 2013 plan will be added Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 6 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT to the list of plans to provide historical context to readers. Chapter 3 Native Community Elizabeth Benson EB and MK to coordinate with local Native community, both for-profit and non- profit, to confirm contents in this chapter. Basic background not changed. Chapter 4 Background Information Elizabeth Benson Statistical information needs to be updated. Setting description confirmed/reworded. MK – make HMP appendix to the new plan – been updates on bluff erosion project. EB – background information drives goals and policies/the foundation upon which they are built. 4.1 Settlement History 4.2 Setting Elizabeth Benson Setting needs to be reworded/updated as appropriate. 4.2.1 Climate & Environment No comments. 4.2.2 Natural Hazards Matt Kelley HMP will available mid-July 2016 and we can use that data for this section. There have been updates on bluff erosion for example. 4.3 Population, Education, Housing Elizabeth Benson Proposing to use state agency Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED) data for population, housing, economy. 2010 census used in 2013 and it won’t be updated until 2020. Confirm data with local Kenai Peninsula Economic Development District (KPEDD). Jim Glendenning Need to recognize employment and economic opportunities that will come from the Alaska LNG Project (AKLNG). 4.5 Economy 4.5.1 Employment & Elizabeth Benson Going to use state agency Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 7 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Income Development (DCCED) data for population, housing, economy. 4.5.2 Business Indicators Elizabeth Benson Need to consult with local Chamber, KPEDD, and other groups (realtors, etc.) to update indicators. 4.5.3 Oil & Gas Industry Elizabeth Benson Jim Glendenning Describe potential employment and economic impacts that could result from the Alaska LNG Project (AKLNG). 4.5.4 Commercial Fisheries & Seafood Processing Elizabeth Benson Update as appropriate describing local activities. Review state and KPEED and other sources for information and forecasts. 4.5.5 Visitor Industry Henry Knackstedt Update as appropriate describing local activities. Review Kenai Peninsula Tourism Marketing Council, Chamber of Commerce, KPEED, and other sources for information and forecasts. Refer to City’s Dipnet Fishery Report for latest information and forecasts for personal use fishery, city dock use. Tables Brian Gabriel Streamline tables so that occupational type matches the actual occupation. With new types of agriculture (e.g., marijuana), it may be important to address this as an economic occupation. EB - Census uses standardized categories that don’t necessarily make sense. 4.5 Public Facilities & Services Elizabeth Benson Describe facilities and services provided by the city and those not provided. Update descriptions as needed. Highlight those services the city provides that are used by non-residents. E.g., animal control, senior center, library. Consult with city administration/public works for background information, issues. Include maps of existing services. 4.5.1 Water & Sewer Systems 4.5.2 Public Safety Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 8 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT 4.5.3 Transportation Elizabeth Benson Describe transportation facilities and services and transit. Henry Knackstedt Include information from latest Airport Master Plan. Jeff Twait Airport is a very important economic engine to the city. Mary Bondurant City present the 2016 Plan process to the Airport Commission – April 14, 2016? 4.5.4 Parks & Recreation Rachael Craig Not enough emphasis on Kenai services provided – such as library, parks, etc. Matt Kelley We will use the latest Millennium Square feasibility study from KOOL in the 2016 plan. 4.5.5 Senior Citizen Facilities & Services Rachael Craig Important to remember that the Peninsula is becoming a “retirement” area. Families are bringing their parents here. It’s a growing population. Senior center service not just Kenai seniors but those in the region. Bob McIntosh Seniors made their contribution to this community. Senior very important and the community is what it is today because of the work of seniors. 4.5.6 Kenai Community Library Rachael Craig Library services not just city residents, but the entire area. 4.5.7 Other Services No comments. Add as identified. 4.6 City of Kenai Finances Elizabeth Benson Update with city administration. 4.6.1 Expenditures 4.6.2 Revenues 4.7 Forecast of Economy, Population & Housing Demand Elizabeth Benson Work with P&Z commission, City Council, administration to develop assumptions about growth and how to measure/forecast it. Talk to local experts re housing growth/decline, issues, forecasts. Jeff Twait If AKLNG comes, it could create potential to benefit city. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 9 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Elizabeth Benson Land ownership can drive economic development – owners decide when they want to develop their land, assemble parcels, sell, etc. Proposed Plan Development Schedule Plan Schedule Matt Kelley Reviewed proposed schedule for next TH meeting on April 16, 2016. Go over next sections in plan – at this time considering discussing land use but may do goals and objectives. Future THs schedule is TBD. Likely there will be a third TH. P&Z commission worksessions likely to occur in May. P&Z commission public hearings likely to occur in June-July. Be sure to fill out comment sheet. Use city’s email address to comment as well. Getting the word out to involve the public in future meetings/planning process. Ken Peterson Good advertising for this meeting. KSRM did good job. Like to see mail out. Matt Kelley Working with local Postmaster to create bulk mailer to not just land owners but all residents (i.e. apartments, businesses). Richard Kelso Like to see information from public from 2013 used in this plan. People in his neighborhood feel like they weren’t heard last time and won’t be heard this time. People drop away. Please listen to the people. Elizabeth Benson Asked Richard for suggestions on getting them involved. Richard Kelso Act in a trustworthy fashion – e.g. Walker Lane Rezone Henry Knackstedt Be careful with airport property – it has a distinct purpose and obligation to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Bob McIntosh Need to build trust. Administration, City Council, P&Z Commission encourage Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #1 March 26, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes (from flip charts) 10 April 1, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT public input. Provide commitment up front. Listen to people because they have the final say (i.e. voter approval). Should all work together. Matt Kelley City Council has the final say on whether to commit to a voter approval of the plan. Possibly go to the Borough Assembly as well. Citizen committee can be formed by anyone and they can come to City Council and P&Z meetings. Committee would be independent of the city and cannot rely on city staff for administrative support. Jeff Twait Hopefully get to a place of community trust. Get people engaged to make it work. Richard Kelso People need to be part of the solution. Hard to get involved. Lack of trust. Commission appointments are political and hard to get. Wants to go in the right direction. Henry Knackstedt Mayor does not appoint commissioners. Council votes to confirm new members. Jim Glendenning Title 29 outlines appointment process. Appointed by the council but not their “minions”. Closed Meeting at approximately 12 noon Matt Kelley and Elizabeth Benson Thanked everyone for their participation and comments. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 1 April 25, 2016 Matt Kelley opened the meeting with introductions and presented a matrix that included 2003 and 2013 Planning Goals and Objectives. Elizabeth Benson gave an overview of the definition of a goal v. objective v. policy. Elizabeth assisted Matt with a facilitated discussion of the matrix. Participants offered comments and suggestions on the 2003 and 2013 goals and objectives. These were recorded digitally. Melissa Kelley recorded comments on flip charts and Kayla Feldman assisted with audience participation. Participants’ comments from the flip charts are organized below by commenter, topic, and comment. TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Introductions, Purpose of Meeting Agenda Matt Kelley Reviewed the agenda and purpose of the meeting. Handout: Matrix of 2003 and 2013 goals, objectives and policies Matt Kelley Described the handout and explained how it was organized. Definition of terms – goals, objectives, policies Elizabeth Benson Reviewed definition of goals, objectives and policies, their purpose, and how they differ Goals Goal order Glenese Pettey Are goals listed in order of priority in the plans? Broad v specific goals Kellie Kelso 2013 goals are broad – would like clarification and more specificity e.g. 2003 goals 1 and 2 Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 2 April 25, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Broad v specific goals Mike Christian Prefers specificity in goals – 2003 plan gives direction Broad v specific goals Christine Hutchison Prefers some broadness in goals so new things/imagination can work City center Henry Knackstedt There are a number of city centers – use 2013 goal #1 and clarify city centers City center Matt Kelley Specific goals developed for areas in the city that were “city centers” City center Mayor Pat Porter Lief Hanson Memorial Park is a center spoke/city center Broad v specific goals Laura Sievert 2013 goals 1 and 2 too broad; 2003 goal 2 necessary; prefers specificity Broad v specific goals Matt Kelley Need to define what is meant by “quality of life” (2013 goal 1) 2013 and 2003 plan goals Glenese Pettey Combine goals 1 of 2003 with 2013 plan 2013 and 2003 plan goals Rachel Craig Agreed – see her notes on what goals to combine between the 2003 and 2013 plan Objectives, Policies Definitions Christine Hutchison Need definitions of what is a goal, objective, policy City center Ken Peterson Map needed that describes city center – boundary to boundary City center Mike Christian There is no single “city center” – there are 3 City center Shawna Norton Specific city centers need connectivity between them; how can they work together to utilize connections. Should city encourage more city centers – by high school, Beaver Loop, etc.? Old Town Kenai Barbara Ruckman Old Town Kenai – need to keep heritage; maintain historic cabins and other buildings. Keep and maintain historic area/district. City center Richard Kelso Focus and develop city center – it’s unique; draw tourists; limit sprawl Millennium Square Pete Hanson Millennium Square development – tourism and convention center draws Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 3 April 25, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT meetings from all over Alaska for meetings. We have abundant activities for all ages. Tourism brings jobs. Airport Barbara Ruckman Airport – need to protect/expand. Loss of airport would be detrimental. City centers Tim Navarre Multiple city centers – define and describe what development city needs/wants in each city center. E.g. Millennium Square and connectivity to other city centers. Definitions Christine Hutchison Are definitions incorporated into the plan or a separate document? Annual Report – Plan Carol Baumer Is there an Annual Report published describing the progress made on planning goals, objectives, and policies? Commercial v. Residential Richard Aber No distinct commercial zones. Preserve sanctity of residential areas. Limit commercial take-over of residential areas. Prioritize residential areas as protected. Keep commercial from “creeping in”. Comprehensive Plan requirements Glenese Pettey Originally thought a comprehensive plan was arbitrary but has since learned it is mandated by state law. Residential and office Debbie Adamson Business office next to residential areas is a problem – sets a precedent and neighborhoods can disintegrate. Limit business offices in residential areas. Business in a residence not the same as residences and offices. Neighborhoods Kellie Kelso Neighborhood should have limited commercial development. Have focus of commercial development in city centers. Industrial parks Richard Kelso Consider creating/allowing industrial parks off highway where there is infrastructure. Economy drives uses Christine Hutchison Boom-bust economy a factor in development. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 4 April 25, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT Public lands – city legacy Richard Kelso What is city’s legacy? Repercussions will result from what is preserved or developed. Public land (i.e. city ownership) preserved for future use and enjoyment. What about where commercial meets residential uses? Is that mixed use? Parks Barbara Ruckman Parks important – Lief Hanson Memorial and the bluff. Commercial on major streets Driveway access Tim Navarre DOT has certain rules about driveway access to major roads (sometimes it’s first- come-first-serve). Take more proactive role in regulating strip development? Consider creating/requiring dual entrances between neighboring parcels. If parcels are 5 acres or larger, they can ask for their own zone. Residential properties – there are no restrictions on tree-cutting; no buffering requirements or restrictions/regulations re tree-cutting or clear-cutting one’s own lot. Consider buffer requirements where residential backs up to commercial and industrial. Airport lands Richard Aber Airport land – city sold land with buffer strip/trees. Concerned with clear cutting buffer strips between residential and commercial. Buffer strips Christine Hutchison How are buffers enforced and monitored? Through permitting/building permits. PINK Pat Faulkenberg PINK zone – Protect Individual Neighborhoods in Kenai. Neighborhoods need a say on development. Required v Preferred? Howard Hill Objectives/policies should require not say preferred Buffer zones? Allowable uses Mayor Pat Porter “Encourage buffers” too weak – consider requiring it. Clear cutting trees Pat Faulkenberg Concerned about duplexes next to where land was clear-cut for building were not Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 5 April 25, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT completed. Residential and commercial Tim Navarre Comprehensive Plan does not set the rules – it’s a plan to move the city in a direction. Provides ideas that inform ordinances and rules. Residential and commercial Kit Hill Neighborhood Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, and Neighborhood Institutional: need design guidelines. Concerned with parcels being rezoned. Comprehensive plan requirements Christine Hutchison Comprehensive Plan – is it an enforceable document? City Council and P&Z are enforcement. Public lands Richard Kelso Public improvements - city-owned lands: things dedicated to conservation need to remain protected. Airport, dock Christine Hutchison Is there a new Airport Master Plan? Yes – we are using it for the comprehensive plan. There is an updated Airport Layout Plan. Re docks – does the plan identify policy re docks and include definition? Dock Matt Kelley Tidelands - city owns tidelands; leased out; not addressed in comp plan presently Educational zones? Mayor Pat Porter Educational zones? Where should zones be? Bike path connections Glenese Pettey Need bike path connection across Bridge Access Road – designated as path. Trails Henry Knackstedt Unity Trail – completed Tim Navarre Trail is a city and state project. Natural setting Richard Aber Natural setting- want these open spaces and conservation areas to be kept. Christine Hutchison Land use meeting – will we see this include? Matt & Elizabeth Incorporation of this information gathering will be used to create draft land use map Land use v zoning Henry Knackstedt Difference between land use and land zoning – conservation within the airport is Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #2 April 16, 2016 from 9 a.m. to 12 noon Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 6 April 25, 2016 TOPIC COMMENTER COMMENT different type of conservation than thought of. Airport conservation is conserved for airport uses. Need to clarify differences in terminology? 2013 and 2003 plans Mayor Pat Porter Clarify 2013 to be used as a draft. Pete Hanson 2003 Plan more direct; 2013 Plan lays out strategies. Tim Navarre 2013 Plan includes information not available in 2003 Plan Christine Hutchison Terminology has changed. Closed Meeting at approximately 12 noon Matt Kelley and Elizabeth Benson Thanked everyone for their participation and comments. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 1 April 30, 2016 Matt Kelley opened the meeting with introductions and purpose of the meeting. He explained that he would be displaying the City’s Geographical Information System (GIS) data to support the discussion of land use classifications. Elizabeth Benson gave an overview of the difference between land use classifications and zoning designations. Elizabeth led the participants through a matrix/table that described the current 2003 (adopted) land use classifications and the draft classifications from the proposed 2013 plan. Matt used GIS to display and compare the land use maps from both plans. Participants asked questions and offered comments about the 2003 and 2013 land use maps, the land use classifications, and uses allowed within each. Participants’ comments were recorded on flip charts by Melissa Kelley as well as digitally. Willie Anderson, City Planning Technician, assisted with audience participation. Participants’ comments from the flip charts are organized in the table below. The table has been developed in the same format as the Land Use Matrix discussed at the Town Hall. Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification Residential Land Use Classifications Elizabeth Benson presented definitions of neighborhood and suburban residential and asked about institutional uses and neighborhood commercial. Matt Kelley displayed the 2003 and 2013 classification in GIS. Neighborhood Residential Suburban Residential 1. Jeff Twait - Keys Point and Shoreline Heights are examples of Rural Residential subdivisions 2. Glenese Pettey - Clarify that neighborhood residential intended for areas that have public water and sewer or it is planned, smaller lots, paved streets and that rural residential intended for areas with larger lots, no public water and sewer available (yet), and gravel streets. 3. Kellie Kelso - Neighborhood commercial uses should not be allowed in neighborhoods. The Rural Residential district includes areas that, due to location or site conditions, are best suited for large-lot single-family residential development. Homes in this district typically rely on individual on-site water supply and wastewater disposal systems. Compatible institutional uses such as churches, schools, and daycare facilities may be intermixed if they comply with zoning design guidelines. Small home- based businesses may be accommodated within certain design guidelines. The Suburban Residential district consists of single-family and multi-family residential areas that are urban or suburban in character. The area is higher density, lots are typically smaller and public water and sewer services are required or planned. Streets should be developed to a paved standard and larger subdivisions should provide sidewalks and public areas. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 2 April 30, 2016 Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification 4. Sandy Ashbrook - There is inconsistency in Neighborhood Residential –clarify wording re having public sewer and water planned and instead include terminology “would be planned” or “could be planned”. E.g. Wildwood subdivision. 5. Russell Sonberg– MAPS area – how will it be affected by plan? There is no proposal to change from Neighborhood Residential 6. Laura Sievert– do not allow change in plan classification to allow small scale commercial – it’s not allowed now. 7. Glenese Pettey– need to define small scale commercial – does it include home-based businesses like photography, midwife? Elizabeth and Matt described the rural residential classification from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS. Asked for input on the intent and location of the classification using the 2003 and 2013 GIS. Rural Residential Rural Residential 1. Laura Sievert - what about conditional use permit process for institutional and home businesses in Rural Residential 2. Sandy Lashbrook – should not include mobile home parks – should be classified as mixed use; be designated as it is; get rid of the “non-conforming” designation. Kenai Peninsula Borough designates mobile homes as commercial. Should not include mobile home parks – should be classified as mixed use; be designated as it is; get rid of the “non-conforming” designation. Kenai Peninsula Borough designates mobile homes as commercial. The Rural Residential district includes areas that, due to location or site conditions, are best suited for large-lot single-family residential development. Homes in this district typically rely on individual on-site water supply and wastewater disposal systems. Compatible institutional uses such as churches, schools, and daycare facilities may be intermixed if they comply with zoning design guidelines. Small home- based businesses may be accommodated within certain design guidelines. The Rural Residential district includes areas that, due to location or site conditions, are best suited for large-lot single-family low-density residential development. Homes in this district typically rely on individual on-site water supply and wastewater disposal systems. Streets typically are gravel and subdivisions do not include sidewalks. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 3 April 30, 2016 Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification Commercial Land Use Classifications Elizabeth and Matt described the central and commercial classifications from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS. Central Commercial Commercial 1. Kellie Kelso – keep buffer between Three Bears and neighborhood residential. Suggest open space designation buffer. 2. Henry Knackstedt – land is city-owned and has deed restrictions 3. Jim Glendenning– re commercial along arterials - have arterials been identified? 4. Kellie Kelso – are arterial and other road classifications different? 5. Henry Knackstedt – identified same 6. Kellie Kelso – is neighborhood commercial along arterials? 7. Sandy Lashbrook – land use should match what is existing. Neighborhood commercial should not be pushed into commercial? Mixed use does not go all along the highway. Booths Landscaping should be mixed use. Should not include mobile home parks – should be classified as mixed use; be designated as it is; get rid of the “non-conforming” designation. Kenai Peninsula Borough designates mobile homes as commercial. 8. Jim Glendenning– rural residential allows for multi-family. 9. Sandy Lashbrook – rural residential includes terminology “low density” – should have low density The Central Commercial district supports retail, service, and office businesses that serve all of Kenai and the larger region. It is the Kenai sub-region’s main commercial district. Retail, service, office, and public uses predominate. Non-commercial uses, such as public offices, institutional uses, and dwellings may be appropriate among commercial uses within mixed use areas. The Commercial district is intended to create a concentrated, vibrant, and attractive downtown business district which is convenient to both motorists and pedestrians. The district is designed to attract commerce from within and beyond the community itself. Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 4 April 30, 2016 Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification removed. 10. Matt Kelley– replied that city could consider mobile home park land use classification. Elizabeth and Matt described neighborhood commercial classification from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS – continued discussion of commercial uses in residential areas. Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial – not a specific classification The Neighborhood Commercial district applies to areas along the arterial road system that are suitable for small-scale neighborhood-serving retail, service, and office uses. No other commercial land use classifications included in 2013 draft. Elizabeth and Matt described the mixed use classifications from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS. Asked about the purpose of the mixed use and where it should be located, using the 2013 and 2003 GIS. Mixed Use Mixed Use The Mixed Use district fosters a compatible mix of retail, service, office, public, institutional recreational and multi-family residential uses. The district does not prescribe specific proportions for these uses, only that all these uses are desirable within the district. Mixed uses are particularly desirable in the Townsite Historic District and City Center overlay zone. The Mixed Use district fosters a compatible mix of retail, service, office, public, institutional, recreational and residential uses. The district does not prescribe specific proportions for these uses, only that all these uses are desirable within the district. The Mixed Use classification should accommodate existing similarly developed areas and areas along corridors to provide transitions between the corridor and residential zones. Elizabeth and Matt described the institutional classification from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS. Asked about whether these uses should be incorporated into existing classes or have a separate one as suggested by the 2013 draft. Institutional – not specific classification Institutional 1. Jeff Twait – see the 2003 map for location of institutional classification. Institutional land uses were not separated out – they were identified as potentially acceptable in residential and commercial classifications provided they are compatible and The institutional district provides an area in which government and tax exempt institutions can offer social and cultural amenities to the citizens of the community. The Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 5 April 30, 2016 Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification meet design standards. City uses zoning regulations to address actual location, siting and design of institutional uses. primary use is public, non-profit, and quasi-public uses including government offices and facilities, schools, churches, and other community-service oriented facilities. Industrial Land Use Classification Elizabeth and Matt described the industrial classifications from the 2013 and 2003 plan and in GIS. Asked if additional industrial classes should be added. Industrial Industrial No specific comments on industrial classification. The Industrial district identifies areas reserved for manufacturing, warehousing, trucking, marine-related industry and storage, and similar industrial activities. City utilities and safe, convenient vehicular access is critical. Buffers between industrial uses and adjacent non-industrial uses are desirable. The institutional district provides an area in which government and tax exempt institutions can offer social and cultural amenities to the citizens of the community. The primary use is public, non-profit, and quasi-public uses including government offices and facilities, schools, churches, and other community-service oriented facilities. Matt discussed recent adoption of a Light Airport Industrial Zoning Classification to implement the recommendations and land use map from the 2003 Comprehensive Plan. Airport Industrial Airport Industrial – not specific classification No specific comments on airport industrial classification. The Airport Industrial district identifies airport lands reserved for the Kenai Municipal Airport and its future expansion, and tracts needed for present and future aviation-related uses and activities. Airport-specific industrial land use classification not included in 2013 draft plan. Conservation – Parks, Recreation - Open Space Elizabeth Benson – explained what is included in the proposed 2013 and existing 2003 plan. Asked if both are needed or if definitions need to be retained, updated, etc. Conservation Parks, Recreation, Open Space Kenai Comprehensive Plan 2016 Town Hall Meeting #3 April 26, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Kenai Senior Center Meeting Notes 6 April 30, 2016 Town Hall #3 Comment & Commenter 2003 Plan Land Use Classification 2013 Proposed Land Use Classification 1. Richard Aber – keep conservation as it is currently classified. Different than parks, recreation, open space – people bought parcels that were near conservation lands – and believed they would never be developed. Don’t want these parcels to be developed. 2. Glenese Pettey– conservation definition – land was meant to be reserved for future use not yet determined. Need distinction between conservation (2003) and parks, recreation, open space (2013). 3. Kellie Kelso – wants a land use designation for “leave this alone” – no development of conservation classification. 4. Jeff Twait – land use classifications need to be match with zoning – consider possibly changing naming conventions for conservation. The Conservation district applies to public lands whose primary use is open space, recreation, fish and wildlife habitat, drainage ways, floodplain, and wetlands. Some public improvements may be appropriate within appropriate design guidelines. This classification includes public recreation facilities, as well as undeveloped lands intended to provide for conservation of natural or scenic resources. These areas can be used for a variety of passive and active outdoor and indoor sports and recreational activities. Areas that may provide future natural resource development should be included in this category. Matt Kelley reviewed the plan development process. There is a meeting with the Kenai Chamber of Commerce on May 11. There will be 2-3 Planning & Zoning Commission Work Sessions in May with public hearings in June. The plan will likely go to the City Council in July. Meeting Adjourned at around 8:55 p.m.