Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORDINANCE 1499-1992:. r L~ r71~~' 6~ • Suggested by: Planning and Zoning CITY 0~,~,'~, ORDIN71NC8 X10. 1499-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA AMEN> THE OFFICIAL CITY OF KENAI ZONING MAP FOR CERTAIN LANDS DESC F AS PORTION OF SECTION 5 & 6, T5N, R11W, TOWNSITE HISTORIC ZO E. WHEREAS, KMC 14.20.270 establishes a procedure to amend Official Zoning Map of the Cfty of Kenai; and, WHEREAS, the Official City of Kenai Zoning Map depic~ these lands as Townsite Historic (TSH), Conservation (C), and General Commercial (CG); and, WHEREAS, the City of Kenai desires to render th area with zoning designations which are compatible with presen land uee; and, WHEREAS, the proposed zoning designation is entral Commercial (CC), and Townsite Historic (TSHj; and, WHEREAS, the Kenai Planning & Zoning Co fission held a public • hearing on May 13, 1992 and as a resul of that public hearing recommend approval of the proposed am dment to the Central , Commercial (CCj, and Townsite Histor c (TSHj, zoning designations, as indicated on atta ed map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED B~/THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, as follows: ~~ Section 1. subject prop rties consisting of those lands depicted in Exhibit A descr ed as Portion of Section 5 & 6, T5N, R11W, Townsite Historic (T j, General Commercial (CGj, and Conservation (C), are her y amended to Central Commercial (CC), and Townsite Historic (T ). PASSED BY THE COUNCII/OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 17th day of June, 1992. / ATTEST: Carol L. Fr as, JOHN J. WILLIAMS, MAYOR erk First Reading: June 2, 1992 Second Reading: June 17, 1992 Effective Date: July 17, 1992 . ,~ ;~ u• ' s ., ull j . Q ~ WASTER j. Hrtxtc, GOLfRNQI~ ~IEPART'4~~`TT Otz' 11T~1'~`1TRA~, RIt;,~O-~R~~S sso, S srAtsY, su~~o ,>>e ANKH©AAGI, ALASKA 994Q3 PifC~NE: (9R7- ~a2.?0?? arria/OMORPARK,f AMOONtD00AatECgEit~pp M~uHA Agaaess• OJT •tNtq~hramtAmR+~pJOgir r.A, ao,e ~p~tf0, . At~:MOAAQl, wiwsK~ ~s,a~oo, June X2, 199Z • Rr: 3130-3 City of Kenai The Honorable John Williams Mayor City of Kenai Zia Fidalgo Avenue Kenai, Alaska X9611 Dear Mayer Williams: At the invitation of the Kenai Punning and Zoning Comacdssio~ I meet wit Cotnmi.~.cion do June 10th to discuss IQCaI historic preservation pro arras. Frog discussion that occurred at the PlA~naing attd Zoning meeting between t~ha CommisS. and the members of the public aqd the questions asked of me, it was evident that th is 1ddressing an important presexvatiatt issue -redrawing bpun~r~ies of the Old '1'ownsitC historic district, Rased on the discussion and the inforntation available, I recommend that the Ci. de13y taking final action on' the revised histarfc district bong 'Y Council additional time to study the issue, exarnitte tbo intent og the ~~ Pr°.p°sal and take alternative strategics. I was asked to d~anct, and develop Commission work session. 'The work sessio n would bG a June Z~th Planning and Zoning a SOOd time to address. these issues. Some questions I think the city needs to address are: * Does the city have a good understanding of the ' •toric properties in the oti ~~a! townsite; historic zone? ~ • Arc there historic properties, sites, landsc~prs, other than the Russian Qrti~odox Church that the city thinks important to preserve in the old townsite'~ '" I ~avr. guidelines ixiterpre~tiug the existing ordiaanCe beCn develo ed so there ' ~Icar understanding of what is or is not auowable for new construction and work on e~;;t;na buildings' ~ ~' Does the coaimuzuty have; ~s good understanding of the concept, purl;oses and benefits of a historic district? .... •. *u~ilp•)Rrccycieap3p~r n Y G.iJ . ,. , ~.... ' ..u t3: 1~~•;~. 11 : S: a"'"i7G::S3 ~ ' • ~` Dacs the City of Kenai want to explore partici atia in the state's Certified P 8 Local Government program which provides technical and financial assistance:to local govorruaents dCValoping a Iocal historic preservation program? * How does historic preservation fit into Kenai's Comprehensive Plan and hoar does this ac,Kion affect that plan? 'Traditionally, historic districts can accommodate n~vv construction and preservation of historic structures. What may be needed are guidelines and an expedited review process to assist private property owners, thereby eliminating the uncertainty of what is allowable. The historic significance of the Russian Orthodox Church is well Cstablished and recognized through the National Historic tandaiark deli tion. significance of sites and structures associated~'th oth~ as ectsnderstood is the historic p of YCenai's history also locatEd in the Old Townsite Historic district. Several sites and buitdfugs were mentioned in the discussion at Tuesday night's htcetfng. It appears that more time is needed to establish the historic significance of the larger area and determine the purpose of the district. A dEC~sion nn re-drawing the historic dfstsict boundary should be made wit.'t a complete understanding of the resources of the ensue area and the consequences of the alternative actions. Historic resources are non•renew-able resources. Qnce destroyed, they are gone forever. Public input is an extremely importont part of the decision malting process in establishing community's priorities for preserving aspects of its history and its identity. I . recommend you allow time for further discussicn about the resources within the dfstrfct and the benefits of a district before taking final action. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this issue. I Look forward to working with the Planning and Zoning Com-snission in the work session scheduled for later this month. Sincerely, w~~~^~ J ith E. Bittner StatC Historic Preservation Officer • 1 ,. t CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ 9Z-9 n A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING ,AND ZONING COMMISSION OF~THE CITY OF KENAI RECOI~IlKENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED tAEZONIN3) BLAND IIBE PLAN A~IENDMENT~ SUBMITTED SY S~t~t__of Kenai Legal Description of Property] WHEREAS, the Commission finds the following: 1. The subject prop®rty is currently zoned o to sto _ e,_nse~rva_ t~ inn, '~ 2. The present land use plan designation of the sub ect is Townsaite Histo i ~ ~ • .:~... j property ~ . ,,,:.. o erc a and _Me~, p-~-e-~.~Y ~eeidentiai. 3. The proposed iZONINQ DISTRICT) for the affected property fs o s to t C ~TSH~ and Cen ra'~ ~:on~Ynpr~, C~ , 4• An appropriate public hearing as required has been conducted by the Commission on May 13, 1992. 5 • That the following additional facts have been found to exist: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the petitioned (REZONINL~~ is hereby RECOMMENDED) to the Kenai City Council. PASSED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, Alaska this 13th day of May, 1992. ,,. ~~i~ EST . w • ~~~ ~ Chairman " • • ., ~r ~• ' 4 .: .. ,. ,. .. ,< • Q~t~fi lIfL~WrC/ CITY ~F KENAI 2Ii~ ~daiga Avenue . Kenai, Alaska 99~~1 M•~• FAJC ~1-283,3014 .~ .. REZONIl~TG APPI,ICATI4N Date: May 13, 1992 Petitioner: City of Kenai Address: 210 Fidalgo :~ Phone: Kenai, Alaska 99611 Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned: Portion of sect,~,_,~ 5 & 6, TSN, R11W. • • Present Zone: Townsite Historic (TSH),~ Conservation iC) Gen. ,~_Commercial Proposed Zone: Townsite Historic Central Commercial CC (CG) - ,. Intended Use and/or Reason for Rezoning: To conform, on ~+~ district to present and proposed uses while protecting Historical sites. Section 14.20.270 Amendment Proce urea governs any amendment to the Renal Zoning Code and Official Map. PLEASE. ~ THE FOLLOWING, AMP-~.~ THE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE AFTER THE I'1'EM NUMBER TO INDICATE THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THESE CONDITIONS. 1• -xi Amendments to the Kenai Zoning Code and official Map may be initiated by petition by a ma~orfty of the property owners in the area to be rezoned; or, a petition bearing the signatures of fifty (54) registered voters within the City of Kenai to amend the ordinance text; or, submission of a petition as provided by the Home Rule Charter of the City of Kenai. 2 • Aamendments to the official Zoning Mao shall, be considered only if the area to be rezoned contains a minimum of one (i) acre (excluding street or alley right-of-wayj unless the amendment enlarges an adjacent district boundary. ^:~ .. - . .. .. ~. ~~ ~. ~.:: ,.~.~ . ~ - ` ' t 3' ...~..~ A Public Notif iaation and Dear ' issuance of this ermi Ong is required before the deposit/advertisingpand adm~.ni+strat ' 00 ~ nOn"'taftxndabie requiz~ed to cover these natificat~,o ive s~e~-vices Pei 3~$ . n cvsts~ . . 4' ~ A A~'aposed amendment to . stxbstantiali the . Zonin . ~ Y the same $a a~ o g ardih~nce which is • isubmitted withintheprevious ninee~proposed .amendment ~ . ' was nat approved shA11 not be eonside ~ ~n°nths and wh3,ch • ~ .~.;'._ ~' red .. '~• ..,. ~,t . ~~ Pe t oner~s S . ..., ., gnature ~~ .~ • • a rman ,: ~~ . Plann ng Secretary •;: .. t ,. .:...: .. .. _. ... ... ,,. :_. ... _ .. . , .,~ . • • t~ ~~ AM t• ' '; ~~ i~ ~. it ~,M077IM ~ *I { ~s t ( ~, ;~ ~ ~ y ~.. ~ - e ~~ ~ I i .} 1 fi i; :~ ~~ '~ ..`~ t z 3~ ~ `, _a~ • ., rra~w ti ~~' ` ~`V •R. ``l ti ` J~ i ` ,• ~ ~~~ { ~ti ~ ~. .;.~ is s~r~ -+~ ~ ~ ~ _. 1 S ,N 017/A1 ~~ R ~ _ ~~ 1 W ? M ,. : t ~ is »n~o 1 R! q ..` • ~ . N q ~ t~ Q e o .. . • ~s oroYq .. .. _ • ~ * ._ - --• i 9 AYMOYDYO e t Q ~ ~ ..... h_.. .~~ V a a i W -• a a ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ 'L ~ O '~ '• 2 r~ '~~ \ ~Y t ~ ' y ~, a L 1 1 i ,. ~~ ~"l~~"~ ~~~~ 1` I ~. v .._~,__ .. . 4, ~ , _ . --~.. ~c c~~rEr, ~ c~~r~tl~, day Areas Apts. p.o. t3oa I~za Kenai,, Alaska 99621 (90~) 283.4405 City of Kenai-Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue C/o Czty Clerk-Carol Kenai, Alaska 99612 City Council Frees Gentlemen: ~}.A •~4 ~ J l:,1 J ~~ ,~~• • ~ 1 ,• 1 .f~•Ayw/~ .. ,~ ~ . ~ •••. •~, .., w .~ f! ~~:` ~ ~, w May la, 1992 ~ r~Y i3, 1992, the Kenai Plt~nning and Zoning Conaaission ~'PZ 92'9-"~e~one Tvcrn,ite ~•iistoric Zone", into ttvo zonin ~'AS'`d Resolution I~rc~posed iownsite Historic and Pro 8 distr:~cts: '!'he total rnunber o•~ po'ed central Commercial. sjxt -parcels or land owners notified ~•as one hundred and a Y (160) , Qf that total, the Plpnning and Zoning Ccnrnission re2 pproximately 24S parcels into Central Cormnercia2 and the remainin aned parcels were zoned Townsite ~~istoric• O.f the 12 pa2•cels zoned T g 12 parcels are oohed by private in-:~ividuals and tho remainin arc~l~' $ either by the pu;si~ Church or some governmental agen g P s are o«nQ;~, tv~ requzsted that our Lots 2 ~ • also lazo~an as ~3a1c Arms Apartments~'o ~` 4, Blk 7 Orig '!'otrnsite-Kenai) zoning a,nd be placed in the CentralbC,on~ ercaal Zon nTotvnsite Historic the other lab parcels. The other seven private oc,rne~$D~iihect' Along with remain in ;'o~,rnsite Historic or Choy did. not object, r j•'atlted to Our ze uest to char a the bouncla to include our i'our 4 lot- in the Entral o•nmercia li~str3ct c~~as er.1ed t e ' . e ee.. are a.n3ustzce ryas one w cn stA an t ,~ C~isUmm~ss~.an. boundaries. lion retiti the jti'e ask that our request to amend Resolution PZ•92-g; (To than e boundary of the Cent2•al Commercial District to in.:Iude Lots 1 S the • Blk ~ , C: iginal TOty'riSitE of Kenai) , be hcaxd before the Cit • ' 2,3, ~; 4, k'et:3i, at it's next regular meeting or at the earliest dare~sCo~c~i of h'~uld yyu please notify us ~:hen we are to attend the Council mthe Council. anY public hearing. eetina, oi• Thank you foi• your cons i~~ei•at ion. Very Truly Yours, Chewier ~t Chewier BdY AYms Apartments • Chewier Pa nzr ~ Owner • • ~; ~~ .. _. f~~ ,/ r w l~ ~ f ~~~ ~ ,~' +';lt ~t.,~ ., y rte,... ~! .. +• ..~ ' `' ~~5~ ~ ~. rri'rii it.:...r i ~' wr ~. ., - ,~lnr. P.O. Hox 134a Kerr~k 1~G F9bi 1 9~ ~ ~ l . ~~~~ • -~,~, ~p `n ~,~p,~ ~~Z' ~ - •' , ~ , , ~w ~! ~i/~ • ' w~ ~~ • ~ ~~ ,~ ~w~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ .~ r ~,.~..~ . ~~ ~ ~~ ~0~~13l~~ • ~~. i, .. • ~~~ / ~ ~~ L~~~"''^"VVV ~f~t ~{Plt~ii ~ ~~~1t1'~ ~~ ~~~~P#~. ~n~. P.o. Dox l348 Kex~t. A,axn s96t1 ~~ ~'.- ~.-~ yz. ~- 1 ..~, /, ,,,.~., .~•-~ :ryY• ,AQ ^~ `f I I ~~rin /~L~S/~"~'`~ j~Y~+fi `~T/'r~q ' I ~~""~ ."'~ ~..., ` ..: ~~c~ i ~'~~ / "' f° ~ `~- . ~- ~..~ ,~. ~~ c e, ~r,,y,„,;,,~ ~. ~~ ~ .~ , • ' ~ /95..~~ss,.,. ~ woue/~.~.~'v .nee +~a ~ ate' Otu ~~~~~~.~ ~.~ ~~_ ~.~.~ . l~ ,tt' /' ~ G~/JL ~~~~ .. ,.. s~ .: DATES MAY 29, 1992 e TO MAYOR JOEN WILLIAMB RENAL CITY COUNCIL FROMs PLANNINt~ AND ZONIN3 COMMISSION Duane Bannock, Phil Bryson, Bernard Laadefa, Baylor Rehm, Art araveley REs ORDINANCE 1499.92 ~ PZ RESOLUTION 92-09s REZONE OF TOWNBITE HISTORIC DISTRICT At their meeting of May 27th, the Planning and Zoning Commission received a memo stating that Council was not totally comfortably with what was proposed and would like to send PZ 92-09 back to the Commission for more work. This letter is to perhaps clarify the Commission's position and explain our course of past and future action, regarding this item. At our original work session on 3/11/92, we felt the best way to deal with the TSH District was to lower or "shrink" the affected area. After reducing the boundaries the Ordinance could be rewritten so it would most effectively deal with what the City of Kenai would like to protect, the Russian Mission and surrounding compound. However, the Commission did not feel comfortable imposing the same restrictions on property owners who lived several blocks from this sensitive area. The Commission felt these properties were more suited to the development standards allowed in the Ce~w Comore cial Zone. 1781-1881 CITY 4F KENAi. ~.., „ail G' ,,ql~~~„ °~ X10 FIDALGO KENAt, At,A$KJ4 X6/1 TELEPHONE ZI13 • T6aE FAX 907.283.3074 • • • After the new boundaries were laid out at a work session with Council on Marsh 11, 1992 A ublic hea P ring was held at the May i3th, Planning and honing Commission meeting (,see. attached. minute~3. Seve~ai peopled spoke. some, weze iri ;favor o.f being, oft of .the TSH, some weze. concerned about the TSH Ordinance, and others were xtot sure what wa8 being prapoeed and wanted. clari~iaa~io~,. After the public hearing, the Commission.. sated cin an amendment ~ to move the proposed property boundaries, at the re .. . owner. quest of m~pr©perty The amendment failed, but the main motion was voted on and passed by .a ~-0 vote. The~comu-ission would urge the Council, to adopt ordinance 1499- . without further delay as we feel we have had ads 92 and discussion. gusts public input upon Council approval of this Ordinance the Commission will be haPPY to open up the text of the TSH Ordinance for public comment and a possible rewrite. Sut to attempt to reverse this process, at this tints, is not favored by the Planning and Zoning Commission. CJ • ... . . .- . .. .. . ,, i KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 15, 1992 Page 7 b. Resolution PZ 92-9: Rezone Townsite Historic Zone Graveley introduced this Resolution with a brief report. •. t s o e t c ~oposed c angg~,;, Towasite Hiatorio: Goal to manage all new development and reconstruction by~ rec~irfnq"~1~-applications for a building permit to submit an application to the a~proprfate body for approval prio~c~`; to the issuance of the permit. This review process has proven to be quite restrictive to property owners of the TSH zone. The City wishes to preserve historic sites while protecting the rights of property owners. The majority of identified historic sites will remain in the TSH zone. Central Comtaeroial: Goal is to provide for an area of concentrated development. Regulations applying to this zone are designed to encourage a compact group of businesses of this type which are mutually beneficial and located close enough together to encourage walk-in trade. Since a large portion of the TSX zone is commercial or residential .it is felt that rezoning portions of TSH to Central Commercial w.iZ.I enhance this area, if an allowance is made for r esidences. Historic sites will remain in the TSX zone and be restricted to development upon approval. Graveley opened the meeting to public hearing. Wayne Cherrier, P.O. Box 1346, Kenai, expressed concern that his apartments were still in the TSH zone. Cherrier requested that they be included in the Central Commercial zone not TSH. Cherrier said they had been excellent neighbors of the Church but wished to be in a less restrictive zone. Graveley thought that the map which was included in the packet was not accurate, from the map prepared at the work session. He felt that if and when the City rezoned TSH the apartments would border the TSH zone but be included in the CC zone. La Shot said that the Commission could change that line at this meeting, that is why the Public Hearing is held, to get input from the community. Bob Cowan, Attorney, said he was on the committee which drafted the original Townsite Historic ordinance, which was basically copied from Juneau's historic plan. His concern was that the new ! ordinance and zone would allow buildings which are inconsistent ti- with the intent and purpose of the TSH zone. Bannock asked Cowan if Bay Arms was eliminated, by a fire, etc.,. would the owner be allowed to rebuild? KENAI PLANNING May 15, 1992 Page 8 AND ZONING COMMISSION Cowan answered that he would be able to rebuild and that he could build a large commercial building which could block the view ~ro~ historic sites. TSH is becoming a tourist attraction and the view ig Pam of that attraction. Jfm Arness, Box 1601, Kenai, testified that he owned pro ert adjacent to Cherrier and felt that the city was unclear in ite intentions for this area. He felt f f the zone was reduced the, .» rules which govern that none should also be clarified. He felt the present ordinance was too broad. He had plans for some development on his propel-ty and wondered if it would be wise for him to remain in the TSH zone. Bannock told Arness that it might be a good idea for him to be in the CC zone, since ft was less restrictive. The line for CC could be moved to include his lots, 5 & 6. Scott explained that the code is presently ve application for most improvements must come before the Commission. The CC zone will allow a variety of uses. Bryson told ~lrness he felt his buildings were a ver of the TSH zone. Arness has renovated older buildingsi acid cis utilizing them for his business. These buildin s are a do not detract from the Mission g Apealfng and • grounds. Arness said, under the present ordinance, if he was to make alterations he would have to, go before P&Z, City Council, and Howard Hackney (Suildiriq Official] . He asked the Commission why he would wish to subject himself to additional restrictions and P & Z reviewY Bannock told Arness if he wished to be included in the CC zone an amendment to the rezone map could be made. Leda Scmidt, Box 1346, Kenai, member of the Russian Orthodox Church, said she was please with the proposal but had some questions regarding the ordinance. Graveley reminding Scmidt that the hearing was for the zonin boundaries only. The ordinance was not being changed at this timeg Schmidt said that there had been a problem in TSH before, that she wished would be avoided by this rezone. She thought the boundar was attractive, but was concerned over some of the wording in the written ordinance. Marcus Targonsky, Box 3427, Kenai, said that during the work sessions for this rezone the Commission had promised to work on the Ordinance. He objected to Mr. Cherrier taking his buildin the TSH zone. He felt that the ordinance was g out of needed to be more restrictive in the TSH too ambiguous and Commission to take the directive from the Mayoriand amend he code along with the zone boundaries. ., .. .., ~..; C e KENAI PLANNING ~iJp ZONING COMMISSION May 15, 1992 Page 9 Graveley asked for more public comment. Seeing no request from the public, he closed that portion of the public hearing. He than read a letter from Frances Meeks of the Kenai Historical soafet (attached). He than brought the issue back to the Commission. y MOTIONs eryaoa moved approval of Resolution PZ 92.9s Rezone of To~msite... Historic Zone. Rehm aavonded. .y • Graveley asked if B ~ Tyson s motion was for the original boundary lines decided on at the work session. Bryson said the intent of the motion was in regards to the°ma included fn the packet and Public Hearing Notice. He felt- p Arness's lots were a positive portion of TSH and that Cherrieras apartments acted as a buffer for the church property. Bannock asked that the Commission take a brief recess a approximately g;Zp p.m, t Graveley reconvened the meetin at a the Commission they had a motion onpthextablely g'25. He reminded AMENDED MOTIONt Bannock moved to amen~t the maia motion to move the bounda of T8 zone ao Lots 3,2,3 ~ 4, Hl 7, Original Towusite His oriel be included in the CC zone. Candela seconded. Cowan asked that the Public Hearing be reopened in light of the amendment. Bryson said he felt the major changes addressed in the rezone ha been adequately addressed in the public hearing, but it could d reopened if the Commission felt it was necessary, be Bannock said he had no objection to reopening the hearin regards to his amendment. Second concurred. g in Cherrier wished to clarify to the Commission that he had three s who live in Alaska who would have ownership of the apartmentsoin case of his death. He felt they would continue to be neighbors to the church and respect it's historic value. g°Od Becky Tromblee, 510 Mission, owners were allowed to pull out Graveley asked Tromblee to indicate her property on the map. asked if the surrounding property of the TSH zone, why she couldn't? display • • • Tromblee pointed to her property which is across from the church. .' . . KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 15, 1992 • Page 10 C f Bryson said that Cherrier and Arness owned property which bordez'ed the proposed zone. In her situation the Commission would be creating a spot zone, which is not allowed. Arness felt if the Commission changed the TSH zone boundaries t2iey should change the ordinance also. Graveley~.said there 1~ad beeYi sow differing opinions as to whether;.~ . the TSH ordinance should be rewritten. It was decided that th~~;~~ boundaries should be changed first and if needed the ordinance would be addressed later. . Tromblee asked if all the remaining 7 property owners who were left in TSH wished to be excluded from that zone, would the Commission consider thf s? Graveley said he didn't have a good response for this. Tromblee said she felt that the Ordinance should have been changed before the boundaries were changed. Gravely asked for further public comment. Seeing none he closed the public hearing and called for the question. AMENDED MOT ION 90TE: Bannoaks Yes Graveleys No Candelas Yes 8aott: Y~to Brysons No Rehms No Amended motion fails. VOTES Bannock: Yes Graveley: Yes Landeis: Yes Scott: Yes Bryson: Yes Rehm: Yes Motion passes unanimously. -~• OL BU8INE88 a. Resolution PZ 92-11: Street Name Change Eadies Wav to Haven Street Graveley introduced the Resolution recommending that the Kenai City Council request the Kenai Peninsula Borough change and establish the name of a certain existing street with the Kenai City Limits. MOTION: Scott moved approval of Resolution PZ 92-11. Landeis seconded. La Shot explained that the Comm' response to a letter they receivedosuggestinq th s tname han e.ln 4 .,... . ... ,. :^