Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORDINANCE 1133-1986 SubstituteSUBSTITUTE NO* 2 Suggested BY: Planning A Zoning Commission CzVV OF 101W 010=0en 1133-96 AN ORDIUMcs OF THE COUNCIL or THE CITY OF ZZMAZO ALAGrAt MMIjjG To Mal NMCZPAL CODE TITLE 14 WITH MR ADDITION or sXCTZON 14.20.105 ENTITLED "TOWNGZTS HISTORIC" ITSH) ZONING DIST2,31M WNUMB, the current zoning Within the area described as Kenai Original To"site currently has varied and conflicting Zoning districts and, --- VURRMASS the Kenai City council has created an Old Tom Committee Original to review and sake recommendations pertaining to Kenai Townsite; and, VM"s, the Landscaping/Site Plan Review Board, a representstIVS of the Old Town Committee, and the Planning G Zoning commission have not In several sessions over a period of several months; 1�.- 1 and, A VRMMU, as 0 result of these public meetings, the Commission feels the draft "Mthibit A" before the Council and attached to this ordinance, now fulfills the needs 09 the Board, Commission, Council and Community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMCIL OP TIM CITY OF KMAII MASKA, as follows: Section The Kenai Nunicipal Code Title 14 be amended by adding Section 14.20.105 entitled, "TOwfisite Historic (TSH) Zoning ........ --77 District" an defined in the attached "Exhibit A." }�ji 7:. to x, , �, r ii � t ��? i1 o a ... .... .... �" 0z 'Pat 7 PABOND IST THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RMAZO Ab"Khe this lath day of Narch, 1987. JOUN WILLIAMBe MAYOR ATTBSTi Carol L. Freas, Acting City Clark• First Reading: may 7, 1966 second Reading: May 21, 1966 Third Reading: June 4, 1996 Fourth Reading: July 16, 1986 Fifth Reading: January 21, 1987 Sixth Reading: March 18, 1987 Stfective Dates April 18, 1987 f. —7 77' w....... j r 14.20.105 1s (a) Intent. The T8H Zvn ng D str ct Is o •ads to provide for a NIX04, controlled use in a designated area, which will protect and enhance the historic character of the zone. The goal of the Ton sone is to manage all new development and reconstruction by requiring all applications for a building permit to submit an application to the appropriate body for approval prior to the Issuance of the permit. All applications must meet the criteria of the application process. (b) Guidelines. The lollowinq guidelines are intended to provide this applicant with an idea of tb• enerai a itei tb .i g r ra • , Landscaping/81te Plan Review Board (Review Hoard) will employ When reviewing proposals for construction in the T8n zoning district. They are designed to preserve the characteristics which typify development in the district and provide the basis for preserving the historical character of the district. (1) All alterations to existing structures should be performed so as to preserve the historical and architectural character of the Ten zoning district. s .?� ` _ Via`.:• (Z) The distinguishing original qualities or character " of a building, structure, or site in its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or destruction of architectural features should be avoided when possible. (3) All existing buildings, structures, and sites should be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis should be discouraged, except buildings that have functional utilities. (4) Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. These --_ changes may have acquired significance of their own, which should be recognised and respected. .,. (5) Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing proportion shall not be discouraged when such alterations or additions do not destroy the historical 1'7 character of the structure. The same will hold true on new construction, that le, contemporary design shall not be discouraged if it does not violate the historical character of the surrounding buildings or of the historic district as a whole. Design proposals for both new construction and alterations to existing structures should be compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the b property, the immediate suL-rounding structures, and those is the historic district. to) Application. An application for construction in the Ton zoning District shall be filled with the planning Department for any rehabilitation/renovation or new construction within the 1Tj1t�- YQ �� fi,ff•w�,, fill(.. �i„e .. L� - --I - -tiro:.__- TOM zoning district as locateo within the bounds shown on the y City of Kenai Official Zoning hap, which application shall contain: _ - - (1) Three copies of the application signed by the applicant and, if leasing the premises, co -signed by the ..¢.-.... owner indicating type or nature of business. -_--T (R) Current color photographs of the site and of any _ existing structures representing both the overall condition 4; of the structure and accurately portraying the materials and color. (3) Three copies of a landscaping and site plan p. complying with the development criteria of this chapter and drawn to scale showing the existing structure and all proposed alterations and additions in relation to the site. Provided that no landscaping/site plan shall be required unless the proposed construction exceeds $10,000 in value. (d) Development Criteria. The development criteria is to provide for a district in which mixed residential and retail enterprises co -habit in a desirable and compatible use. All landscaping/site plans and/or proposed construction shall:_.v° (1) Encourage, wherever possible and compatible with historic character of the TSH zone, loot traffic; restaurants, gift shops, parks, etc. t indigenous Renai Peninsula flora; historic interpretation; wooden structures'` "¢ Including log style with soft colored or natural sidings. Z) Discourage uses which will violate the historic and scenic quality of the TOM zone; buildings and building additions that are not compatible in height with adjacent buildings or which violate the existing scale of the distriett metal buildings; quonset but style buildings; buildings with a "modern design" style of architectursr morethan duple& residences; gas stations; auto repair shops; rental storage of any kind; junk; kennels or similar uses. (e) Setbacks. Setbacks within the T8H zone shall be as stated in the INC Development Requirements Table under the Urban Residential (RU) criteria, except as to existing buildings. -;-` It) Review Process. Upon submittal of an application, the Planning Department shall schedule the application for review by the Landscaping/Bite Plan Review Hoard at the following_.. _ appropriate meeting. (1) Approval or rejection of the landscaping/site plan .c shall be based upon the development criteria in-=-- subsection(d) above and all other pertinent provisions of the Kenai !Municipal Code. (3) should the Review Board require modification to the submitted application or additional submittals due to unusual conditions, then the additions shall be submitted by the applicant when requested by the Review Board prior to approval of the application by the Review board. (3) Upon approval of the application by the Review °. . Board, the application shall be forwarded to the Building Official. el.:.�..:%.•• . �... rt _ .. \l� _ _-•• l:fir: ' .. rr - .. `'.1-� : . r� 0 CITY Of KENAI „ill eaisd�4&,. �•NMM./ IA� MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Williams and Council Members FROM; Janet Loper, planning Specialsit SUBjECTg Historic ( Ordinance 1133 Zoning District pertaining to a New•Townsite TSH) DATE: March 11, 1987 Mr. Sutcliffe and I have reviewed the ordinance and passed it on to the planning Commission which met on March 10th. The Commission feels very comfortable with the ordinance as it is being presented to you atw requests approval. Q 5'I 74 T—% . ,;. •, - . i, •� ,'' .. _-•. It � .r�} �.'S,� ti+- ... ,a Ja • �' r N CITY 0KEHAS'°`' �3 (!I11: J.tLijY. TO: Janot Loper, Planning Department City of Kenai BROM: J. Ron Sutcliffe, Acting City Attorney City of Kenai DATE: March 10, 1987 RB: Townsite Historic Zoning District Ordinance 1133-86 Pursuant to Councils request, i have reviewed the Townsite Historic Zoning District and put it into appropriate (as near as possible) order. At this time i would ask you to review the ordinance for comments. It you are satisfied with the May it is, Z It should be submitte(: for inclusion in the Councils packet for the March 18, 1967 Cvuncii Meeting as a substitute to be passed *y by the Council at that meeting. No changes have been made to the wording of the ordinance, except where necessary to clarify an obvious intent. Accordingly, = do not see that it needs to go back to Planning and Zoning.'' Again, I wish to emphasize that i have reviewed the ordinance and .. attempted to put it into order as nearly as could be determined from the original document presented to me. t an moking no { representation as to the enforceability and/or advisability of this particular ordinance. The first time 1 kave :eon it was just prior to the last Council meeting. Accordingly, f have done the best t can do with it at this point without sending it back -.=-- to PAZ, something you have informed me, they apparently would 1 T•1- :G�''' abhor. L._• �`>._- . _ Z have specifically taken out a reference to Kenai Peninsula Borough Code 21.76.180(f)(1) as my research indicates that the ordinance does not exist in the Kenai Peninsula Borough Code. 1. -1 0 •. t it o —_ � .. _-- _ . i:. .. , _,, -'>.� ._.._ C .. - Y .