Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORDINANCE 0901-1983'iurlgisritec1 bys Admiiiintrcit inn CITY 111 X1NAI ORDINANCE NO. 901-83 AN ORDINANCE; OF Tiff: COUNCIL Of' THE: CITY Of KE.NAI, ALASKA, INCREASING ESTIMATED RMNUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $90,000 IN A NEW CAPITAL PROTECT FUND ENTITLED "SECTION 36 SURDIVViION DEVELOPMENT." WHEREASt the Council dooiron to proceed with denign of oubdiviolon development of the 5er-t.ion 36 bluff nrea, and WHEREAS, menieo are available in the General Fund unappropriated fund balance for Ouch purp000O. NOWT THEREFIIRE, OF 11 ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA# that the following Itserenoeo in eatimated revenuer; and oppropriationo be modes General Fund ncroaoo atImat od Rev onuoos Appropriationo of Fund Balance izaalm Incroaoa Approprlot lariat Non-Doportmerit al-Tranuforn out 129&vn Soction_36 Subdivision_Development Capital Project �'>ner"i o Ea ma o ovenuoas Tronofor from General Fund 1-9 Incroaoo Appropriationo: Adminlotcut ion 900 Engineering 89,1,00 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,, thio 30th day of November, 1983. L ,M If Approved by Finonens ii . Firat Readings November 16, 1903 Second Roadinrls November 30, 1983 Fffoctive Datos November 30, 1983 El _. a , CITY OF KENAI %Od Cdpdal 4 4"„ /. O, EOX NO KENAI, ALASKA 99611 11UPHONE 2103 • 706 November 91 1983 TOs Keith Kornelia, director, of Public Worka PROMS Jack La Shot, City Engineer SUBJECTS Section 36, Engineering Proposals The following three firms were apparently short-lioted by the City Council to be considered for award of the development engineering of Section 36. Mike Tauriainen, P.E. McLane and Aasociatee, Inc. Winco, Cortheli, Bryson in reviewing the proposals for these firms and talking with each firm, it appears that all have submitted proposala consistent with the City's request. All firma are currently doing work for the City and have established track record$ in this type of work, One problem that comes upp, especially with a project such as this, is the clear dofinition of acope for engineering services. The aeopo cannot accurately be established until all information can be gathered from the variou© ontitiea of the City that may have input (Planning and Zoning, City Council, Parks and Recreation, Adminintration, Public works, etc.). in 'affect, these groups and ultimately the City Council will decide the extent and character of development for. Section 36. From an engineer'a perspective, it is very difficult to give a firm pproponal as to the effort and coat needed. Thia is illustrated key Wince, Cortheil, Bryoon'o wide range in coat figures. Their costs vary directly with the linear feet of streets, water And sower lines, and number of parcels created. Although, McLane and Aasociatee and Mike Taurisinon, P.E. did give firm not -to -exceed figures, it remains to be seen whether these costs can he adhered to after all input in gathered and a master plan identified. � .�.,.-- :n::r�-:f�!':... �• 5 �..._. - ,�� •! � __ ��;{ _ .yY.✓Y.-+;..:�"'°. _C's�.'r32'' "•S.uete�--'��'•,��waaw.�. �.;..�.'.,.I�ore�L:�:......-:-or-r.+s F f There are two ways I think we can proceed at thin point. One is to award the project to one firm and hope additional work is not created, McLane and Associates should be a gaud choice for this because of their extensive planning and surveying experience and the ability now to perform soils testing and engineering in-house. The other two firms have retained competent firms to assist them with portions of the work (mostly surveying). Another way to proceed is to have a firm take the project through the master planning phase to accurately lefine the work. This would include all meetings, data gathering, and presentation of schematica, of which, one schematic would then be accepted as the course to follow. At this point, the City could ask for new proposals or negotiate with the same firm to completely plat and engineer the project and be much more certain of work expendi- tures and costs. McLane has indicated that 04,000 could accomplish this phase. I personally would recommend the second method of proceeding. However we proceed, I would like to stress the importance of having the entire project completed as planned. The proper panning and engineering will benefit all City residents through higher property values and lower system maintenance costs. The costs incurred now will be returned many times over through the years, JL/jet .- O /t/ , y &M.4601"'W r Suggested by Administration Ttr CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR RNGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE TO MCLANE & ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT ENTITLED, "SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT, SECTION 36 BLUFF AREA" FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $89,100. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received proposals from the following firms: Professional Design A.ssociates Mike Tauriainen, P.E. Wince, Corthell, Bryson McLane and Associates A & S Engineers, Inc. WHEREAS, the Public Works Department and the Council of the City of Kenai feel that it is in the best interest of the City to award this project to McLane & Associates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that a contract be awarded for engineering design services to McLane and Associates for the design of the project entitled, "Subdivision Development, Section 36 Bluff Area" for a not -to -exceed amount of 009,100. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA this 16th day of November, 1983. ATTESTS Janet Whelan, City ier-k Approved by Finance: b /� e-wRlo A- W/ -101V D All— 7 /i'iA44* 94l r- a 90'0. fo/ Pufl()nrsted by Admitilfit. r01s)n CITY Oil KXNAI R96OLUTION NO, 03-151 A RESOLUTION ON THE COUNCIL Oil TUX, CITY OF XHNAI, ALAOXA, AWARDING A CONTRACT P014 PUMPARATION OF A MAOTL►It [PLAN 1110 MCLANN b AHSOCIA'1EN YOU TUB PRO 901 914TITh9b, "9110DIVINION 1)9V9hOVM1 UT0 SECTION 36 BLUFF ARLA" YOH A NOT-1'O-1;XCN,91) AMOUNT Oil 04,000, WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received propasaln from the followinq firms$ Professional Dooign Associates Mike Tauriain®n, P.O. Wince, Cort}real, Bryson McLane and A000ciateo H 6 H Ongineerrs, Inv. WHOURAs, the Public works Department and the Couneil of the City of Kenai feel that it in in the best interont of the City to award this project to McLane & Annovintea. NOW, THORMFORRf AH IT RHAOIXED BY THU COUNCIL ON THU CITY OF KENAI, ALAUKA, that a contract be awarded for Preparation of a F Master Plan to McLane and Associates for the project entitl#d, "8ubdivision ©®voloprnent, Hoction 36 [sluff Area" for a not -to -exceed amount of $4,000, PAGOED BY THE; COUNCIL Oy THU CITY OY KLNAI, ALAUKA thin 16th day of November, 1983. AT'l HOT s one ra an, —My eloric Approved by Yinancer v, q too `v �v o4 0 to Pip g � � t►� of u 7 or �d 00 0 0