Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1995-63 CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 95-63 . A.RESOLUTioN OF THE COUNCIL.OF'THE CITY OF.KENAI, A .LAsKA; STATING' THE'". cITY's ·NUMBER ONE PRIORITY PROJECT FOR CAPITAL i~PROVEMENT8' FYg-'E96 IS. THE CITY'S.WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY/DEVELOPMENTPROGRAM. · ' WHEREAS,' the CoUnCil of'the City of' Kenai has cleolded to Stats that'the.Olty,s number.. one prioritY project for CapitaI. Improvements FY.' uee is .,, desorlbed on. attachm~t.'i.- number 1, labe. led Water Quality and QuantitY/DevelOpment Program Project De;oription;. ' and WHEREAS,'-attachment numar ~. isa rough financial analySIs '.of the' cltY'S'water"qualitY:' and. quantity/development program ..and. shows the rough cost. estimate for .the Improvements and the rough estimate of the available funds; and WHEREAS, this analysis shows that. this program will cost roughly $2,300,000 to complete the Improvements and the city should have $1,340,973 of available funds, which. leaves $959,027 needed in futura grants from the State; and WHEREAs, the city has applied for ~.11,665 (amount relived last year) under the FY 97 Municipal Capital Project Matching Grant Program; and. .. WHEREAS, the.. City. has applied .for $959,027 under, the .Alaska' Department Of Environmental ConServation (AD. EC)50% Matching Grants· P~ogram' (Which'Will also .be decided bY the State legislature), and ' ' ' ' WHEREAS, the city plans to ask the State Legislature through a direct appropriation, fOr the remaining funds that are needed Inoludlng the matching funds to complete this project; and WHEREAS, attachment 3 shows a posslb~ method for grant funding of this project. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, is stating the city's number one priority project for Capital Improvements FY 95/96 is the City's Water Quality and QuantitY/Development Program. (~Ao.SSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CI~ OF KENAI~_A_~KA, this 19th day of tober, 1995. ~ · ,/'/JOHN J/~ILLIAMS, MAYOR Carol L. Freas, City Olerk, n ~ Reviewed by Finance: ~ Written by P.W.: ~ 10/95/kw ~ ~ ATrACHMENT NO. 1 TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-ff3 WATER QUALr!'Y AND QUANTITy/DEVI:I-OPMENT_PROGRA~._ The City of Kenai is requesting state assistance in the form of funding grants for our:. Water System Improvements. The problems with our present water system that these grants will help in solving:'. 1. oD.p.[~. Our present water has a brown color caused by organic coloring,· .or. tannins. Turbidity. Our present water has a high turbidity. US EPARequlatt0ns. Surface Water Treatment Rule for groundwater under the direct Influence of surface water may require a change in our present system.. Water Su~31v. We have a water supply problem during years of Iow rainfall..The recent addition of the Thompson Park Subdivision (162 lots) requires an additional' water well. Fire Safety_ and Water Pressure. The city water system study by Nelson: &. Associates revealed four water line loops that are needed to alleviate dead endS.:'.' and provide better circulation, fire safety, and water pressure. The funds would be used to: Desiqn andconstruct a new well.hour. We have drilled many exploratory wells and have found a location between our existing well houses, to have excellent water quality and quantity. We have completed drilling this production well no. Desiqn andconstruct a new SCAD. A for all three wells, underground pump house, with it's 3 million gallon tank, and possibly other data gathering points. This.new computer operated system will allow the city to have much better control of the system. Our present system is over 20 years old and still relies on pressure/flow. mechanical switches. The new system will allow us to control the water from point as a system instead of individually. Deslan and construct water..line Ioo_~, This will help solve the problems listed in #5 above. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO RESOLUTION NO. ~ WATER QUALITY AND QIJANTiTy ./DEV~O~I=NT'PR0~_RA_M ROUGH FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ~ Rough Estimate. System Improvements Costs 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ?. 8. 9, 10. Drill exploratory wells . Completed Water System Study (N'eis'o'ni ::::: :::::::::::-::::. ::::::: Complet"ed'. Well Yield Study .... ComPleted Production Well, development, test pumping (August, 1995) ....... OngOing Design m',d Inspect new well house #$ (winter 1995/96) . .... ..... 150,000. Design and Inspect new SCADA for all three wells (Winter 1995/96) ... 50,000 Construct new well house #3 (summer 1996) ....... .... ...... 1,300,000. Construct new SCADA for all three wells (summer 1696) ......... 300,0(:X) Design and construct water line loops (summer 1996) ........... . $00.000 Total Rough Estimate of Available Funds ADEC Sewer Interceptor ADEC Thompson Park Water & Sewer Legislative Sewer Interceptor Legislative Thompson Park Water & Sewer Municipal Match (1995) (water well dev.) Municipal Match (1996) Total $ 238,476 425,000 58,705 241,800 166,327 21 t.665 $1,340,673 (left over funds)- (left over funds) (left over funds) (leftover funds) (left' over funds) (water quality dev.) SUMMARY Estimate of Improvement Costs Estimate of Available Funds Funds Needed to Complete Project $ 959,027 14 q~ .,WATER.QUALm., AND:., .QUANT _rrY_/DEVE_ LOPMEKr ._PF! OG .AM POSSIBLE iMETHOD FOR.GRANT FUNDING ~'. '" This method of funding makas.:the f°ll°Wlng, aaSumptions;~"i".' .: :' :. ¸1. Municipal Capital Project' .Ma' t~!ng Glrants.,pregr'am' '; The city is allowed to u~, eny fdnds, I~luding'~ :'stets grant': fund,q,.:for.. it~. 3CY',~..~ .. matching contribution to .the' Municipal Capttal'i.P~eOt'" MatChing Grants program;. ".' The city is allowed to use ..any funds, inoluding other State . grant funds,'fOr matching contribution to the ADEO Matching GrantSProgram. City reoelves future grant ~uests from state as listed '.below,. · · ~F. XIST!NG FUNDS LEFT. OVER FR~:PA~rPROjEcTs. a. ADEC (Sewer Interceptor) $ 238,476 b. ADEC (Thompson Park.W&S) 425,000 Total ADEC .' $663,476 o. Legislative (Sewer Interceptor) 58,705 d. Legislative (Thompson Park W&8) ~ Total Legislative . Municipal (1995) Munioipal (1996) Total Munlolpal Total. Past Projects '1,340,973 FUTURE GRANT. REQUESTS_ FROM, 51'ATE ADEC (1996) Legislative (1996) Municipal (1997) Total Future 486,624 260,838 211.665 959,027 Grand Total Past and Future ADEC 50% MATCH IS.MET Total ADEC = $663,476 + $486,624 = $1,150,000 Total non-ADEC = ~ 2,300,000 MUNICIP~U. ~4)% MATCH 18. MET Total Municipal = $376,992 + $211,665 = $ 538,657 Total non-Municipal = ~ .. 2,300,000 -.