HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1994-09 Suggested by: Administrate. on
A ~SOL~Zo~ OF ~E CO~CZL
A CO~cT FOR OF ~E CZTY O
~ZSHZNG F K~AZ, ~
~TITLED T ~T~I~S S~, AH
EL~Ry ~D E~UIPM ~ING
.... ~.O0 ~ '~'~ ZNC. ' · ~'
CO~~S T~,~ .... ~ZCH ZNCL~Es ~~; ..... FOR
~~S, the followt-- ~--
· ~ ~as were received on Feb~a~ 24, I994 for
=ne a~ve referenced materials and e~tpment~
Alyeska p~p & E~tPment . [ ~ 167,275.00
Ja~ig Electric . . . . . . · . . 170,333.12
Alaska p~p & Supply ' ' ' ' · · 171,22~.00
IISCO . . . . . . . . . . . [ . . 200,980.00
~~S, the r
consultant, and effFe~aa~°n... ~rom_ All~n Houtz
contract to A~- ~-,- _-ac wor~s Depar me the Project
com ut -- -=~, ~nc. for = nt ~s to
P er, telemetr the co~ ard the
cost of 21~ ~a. ~[Y e~tp~ent, and co----- ica~on and dtsul~v
---,-~.vv, and .,~,o& panels for the
~~S, the Council of the ~ty of Kena~ has dete
Tek, Inc. 's bid for the specified mater~al- --~ _[~ned that. A~r .
lowest responsible bid and award to ~s bidder would be ~n
best ~nterest of the C~ty, and - ~.u ~lPment ~s '~e
~~S, sufficient monies are appropriated.
W, ~~FO~, BE IT RESOLV~ .
~, that ~e ~..--,-~- ~Y ~E CO~CIL o~ '
o]ect ent~tle~ ~~nln~ or materials 2~' THE CITY OF
c , .... - -=~eme=rv S~-~ ...... -'-- e~tPment for '~e
· ~r =~e total - ~'~=~ upgraae ~
~ount of $12 awarded to Air Tek,
CO--un,cation and d~splay computers, telemetry e~tpment and
7,193. O0 which ~nCludes
control panels.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI,
March, 1994.
,, ~th~s 2nd day of
ATTEST:
Written by Public
Approved by Finance=
BID SUMMARY .,
TELEMETRY SYSTEM UPDATE
The bids for this project have all been reviewed. The total system bids adjusted to refl~t
different inclusions made by the bidders are listed below In asosnding price order.-
......... . .............. $127,103.00
157,275.00
170,333.12
171,221.00
200,980.00
VENDOR
Air Tek, Inc.
Alyeska Pump & Equipment .............
Jahrig Electdc ........................
Alaska Pump Supply.
There are no savings possible by purchasing from multiple suppliers, and there Is a
significant advantage to having a system supplier.
The level transducer being proposed by the Iow bidder (Air Tek) has not yet been'fully
evaluated. The manufacturer is WIKA, which is a reputable supplier. However, we are
waiting for detailed specifications and references. There is a reasonable probability that
the bidder will be required to use the transducer we have tested at Inlet Woods. ff that
decision is made, it will result in an additional cost of approximately $8,700 to the ....
purchase order. This leaves the bid price fully $30,000 below the next bidder. ' .... .
It is my opinion that the Iow bid should be accepted and a purchase order issued, ':..-... '-'.
Allen Hourz, consu tant