The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESOLUTION 1981-74 ., CITY OF RENAI RESOLUTION N0. 81-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENAI, ALASKA, AOTHORIZING THE CONTRACT FUR ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING DESIGN P.ND INSPECTION FOR RENOVATIuN OF T8E RENAI MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TERI4INAL BUILDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RE2JAI AND CARMEN V. GINTOLI, ARCHITECT. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received eight proposals for this project, and WHEREAS, this project is funded with 1981-82 State Legislature funds, and WHEREAS, this contract will not be executed until these funds are available, and WHEREAS, this project has been authorized by the Council of the City of Renai, and WHEREAS, the proposals from all eight firms were given consideration and study by the Public Works Committee of Council, and WHEREAS, the Public Works Committee of Council recommends to the Council as a whole that the contract for this project be awarded to Carmen V. Gintoli, Architect, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENAI, ALASKA, that Carmen V. Gintoli, Architect be awarded the project of the Architectual/Engineering Design and Inspection for the Renovation and Expansion of the Renai Municipal Airport Terminal Building for a lump sum figure of $190,250, subject to receipt of the grant and appropriation of monies. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day of August, 1981. ~.--„~-- VINCENT O'REILy3, YOR ATTESTS C 3 et Whelan, City Clerk carmen virrcer~t gintoli, architect - ~ox 3aQ4 p~ofe~ional building suite 210 enai, a aska 9966117 ~JO7 283.7732 July 31, 1981 ' City of Kenai - ~ Post Office Box 580 Kenai, Alaska 99611 Attention Mr. Ketth Kornelis, Director Public Works Department Dear Ke1th: •, Per our telephone conversation this day, we are pleased to offer the following tee schedule.- ~ Our fee is based on a "Services Rendered" schedule rather than percentage of contract. The fee-will be the Lump Sum amount of ' 5190,250.00. - t•!e will take the protect beginning with Schematic Designs, through the bidding phase and provide a full-time on-site individual during the course of construction, assuming ~ twelve month construction period. . Please refer to the enclosed copy of. the proposal submitted on June 24th, 1981. Specifically Items 1 through,lO for the outline of specific services to be provided. _ Please do not hesitate in calling us should you have furtf~er questions. We will be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to negotiate a contract. . Sincerely, - ~• ca ~~ vlncent gint li, architect - ~ - t~ Carmen V. Gtntoli - - CVG:sb ~ • Enc. • /~ carr~sen vincent Gintoli, architect box 3504 proles Tonal building suite 210 kena~, ataska 9Jf1~ 907 283.7732 „itv F;ena~ :';:St :if f I CE 7Y iQJ r:e~ai, Flasks 99611 Attention -`.r. Y.eitt. t:or.^.elis, G:recTCr G~;,artmert o` Public YJ~rks RE: 1981 Airport Terminal Renovations and Er.;..ansio.^.s Proposal for Architectural Services PROPOSAL 1. Carmen Vincent Gintoli, Architect Kenai Professional 9uilding Suite 210 Post Office Sox 3504 Kenai, P.laska 99611 283-7732 2. Established in Y.enoi April 24, 1978 • Previous Address - 5 Hioh Street, Medford, Massachusetts February 5, 1976 tc January I, 1978 3. Qualified for General Practice of Architecture 4. Principal; Carmen V. 6~ntofi, Registered Architect in Alaska and Massachusetts N.C.A.R.B. Certificate in Process 5. -• Key Personnel: Y.enneth 6. Leader, A l f;, Ren i stered Architect i n P, l aska • Certified by N.C.A.~.5. See enclosed resume for experience • 6. Staff available: Carmen V. Gintoli Kenneth B. Leader •• , Both will be directly involved in design •and_production of contract documents.' Additional Staffing as required for project. 7. Consultants: Airport - Howard Nsedles Tamm?n and Bergendoff, Sea~tle office• 'a ~ . • '+[ , ? Consultants (contin~Ed) • ,CIVI I, SOIIS, and .~,truCtUrtlt LnOtneerlnc - 4,'Ince C7rt~~F•II Cr}'SOn, F.E''.ci Surveyinc - 'alone Surveyin5, Y.enai ';echanicel - Jan t:. Ha~,sen F.~. Anc`~cra?c- Electrical - David _. Olscr. P.L. hnchorace ~. ~I; er rn e~~S. ~v'c c-•,~i.~~- ~jl• 1O.'.~ .O~ ~~;; i G Lu,^rPcT Frc ~ ': ~ 5 • ~'' Car one I I ^.e5 1 ~enCE ~ i n~', ~~:)/ Pit*s K~.si~ence ?.IGC~,OJ~~ ~.+_ ~_ Fethod: 10. va~a uctherinc ?hysica! - On site inspection cf e>:is~`inc conCitions, whicF, CUE to - ' our past invotvment or, t~~-eE :,ro,iects at the facility '(Two Schematics, and Contract Documents for Arctic coyer), _ puts us in a unique.position of familiarity with the StructurE. E~camination of existing condition drawings which will be verified by physical measurement of existinc Structure. S*~ace Design - ConTa~t wilt be made with ALL Commuter Airlines ~..^.d Carriers bet t, present, and these who have applied for space i.e. Sr:ien, Alaska Air Lines, P..A.1., South Central, Sea Air, etc. ' Information will be gathered from: the users regarding special requirements and number of passengers present and anticipated. We wilt also meet with Rental Car Agencies and around trans- portation agencies to determine their requirements for terminal space and parking space. , Data gathered from these meetings wilt be assimitated in Report form. 11. Evaluation: Data Report will be given to the City of Kenai for Review and Comment. Our team wilt meet with City of Kenai Officials - as required for Data Report Review and Recommendations.' Review results ~ti~ill be coordinated with various users. Schematic Design Phase: After Uata Report is revie~red and approved, t:~c information will b~ put in schematic desi~r~ form an~ presente~ to the City of Y.enai and to the users for review and comment. Presentations for Public Hearings will be made as required by the C i ty of Kenai . Ait information gathered from various presentations will be assimilated and revisions to the Schematics will be made if required. Preliminary Design: Upon final acceptance of ii~e Schematic Designs, we will proceed tcs the Preliminary Design phase. _ Preliminary Designs will bs presented to the City of t:enai and the users for review. Public Presentation will be made as required by the City. 1 ,. ,,,~ • _~... _ ~r.. - J?sJgn :J~•.el;,:,,r.ent/Cofilract UG=u•'ibr~TS: :•:iOr~ eCCepTOnCE Of the 'rre l i rc~ nary Ges i ohs, the Des i ar Deve l cpr~ent /Cor,tracT DocurlenT phase will begin. rerricdie presentations will be rr,adE tc the City of Y.e;~ai durino this phase. Sai~ presentations wilt bE made at L: percent completion, 5~ acres^t coma, I et io-, anC 7: percent coma: I eT 1 on. r Ina I .•~G %~'~~'a~ I Cfl w I I i be C.a.^. ~: u&f ore P I L'u I nc "r0~8~Ur&. D~rirl~ alf phases of desicr,,'O;ficials of the City c` ~:Rnai are er~rouraoec tc v i s i t our c" i ces for aro~-ess u;: c~~es. 13iddinc: Y:e v.•ill assist the City as rec;:irea dJring the Eieding Phase ir: Bid Tabulation anc ir~Terpreta'ior~. Construction Phes?- ?rovide a full tir:e an site individual to: 1. Observe construction and report variations from the Contract Documents. • 2. Review and approve 311 submittals. 3. Review and approve for consideration by City of all Pay Requests. 4. Perform a{I duties required of a Froject lnspettor. The proposal includes, but is not timlted to, all of~the above. r