HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1987-18Suggested by:
Administration
CITY OFKBJfl~
IBBOhUT2:ONMO, $7-$8
A ~SOL~TZON OF T~ CO~CZL OF T~E CZTY OF ~AZ,
AW~J~DZNG A CO--CT FOR ~GI~ZNG DBSZGN ~Z~, CONS~UCTZON
~AG~, C~ATZON, 8~ZNG, ~ ~8PECTZON S~VZCB8
Hl~ TA~IAI~, P.E. FOR ~ PR~BCT ~ZTL~ '~ZUBS~, BASIN
VZ~, ~S, B~~, ~ ~GLBR DRX~" FOR A
~0~ OF 844,310.
~S, ~he C$~y o~ Kena~ Fe~eSved p~o~sals ~Fom ~he ~ollowSng
~$m on ApF~1 7, 1987:
HSke T~uriaSnen,
HcL~e and Asooc~ation8, Inc.
~nce-Cor th,~l 1-Bryson
~S, ~he ~,~lic Works Depar~ent ~eels that it is in the best
~ntere~ ~ the C~ty sE Kenei to award this pro, eat to Hike
Teu~einen, P.E.; and
~R~S, the award includee e design review end
construction management, coordination, surveying, and inspection;
~d
~S, su~E~c~ent ~ds are appropriated.
NOW, ~FO~, BE IT RESOLED BY ~g CO~CZL OF ~ Cl~ OF
~AI, ~S~, 2hat a contract be awarded ~or Engineering Des~
Review, Construction Management, Coordination, Surveying,
InspectLon Services ~or ~he pro~ect entitled "Gul~ueeen, Basin
View, ~es, Bar~ara, and ~gler Drive~ EoF · not-to-exee~
~o~t o~ 844,310.
PASSED BY ~E CO~CIL OF ~E CI~ OF ~AI, ~AS~, this 25th day
sE April, 1~87.
n, City Clerk
rpp roved. by_ F.~9~nc.e.: ~
~.tten Dy FUD~LC
L.
F'
FROll **
DATE:
CITY OF KENAI
.
Keith Korne'lie, Public Workp Director
LaSher, City Engineer ~
April 10, 1987
SUBJECT: JABBA - PROPOSALS FOR A DESIGN REVIEW, CONSTRUCTION
I~NAGEI~NT, INSPECTION, AND SURVKYZNG.
The following engineers submitted proposals for the referenced
project April 9th.
Hike Tauriainen, P.E.
Wm. J. Nelson & Associates
Xchane & Associates
Wince-Corthe11-Bryson
$44,310
$45,540
$64,400
$82,s31
Included in the contract will be a design review and some
modifications of plans and specs prepared by Oceantech. The
extent of needed modifications is still unclear at this point,
however, it is my opinion that this work is necessary after
reviewing the plans and specs and consi=ering Oceantech*s
previous work with the City. The wide spread in fees appears to
be a result of each firms* opinion of the work necessary in the
review phase, surveying, and differences in hourly fees. The
hours figured for inspection of the project appears to be fairly
close among the firms.
Nike Tauriainen has submitted the lowest fee for the project, and
considering that this firm has performed inspection (and
redesign) for one of the past Oceantech projects (Cook Inlet View
and Lilac) they should have some insight as to the problems to
expect.
I think everyone concerned should realize that the stipulated fee
is very competitive and may not be adequate if problems unforseen
at this point, either in design review or construction, should
occur,
The resolution of award will read Mike Tauriainen, P.E. A
representative of this firm will be present at the April 15,
1987, Council meeting.
JL/aw
PROJECT\JABBA\INSPAWRD.MEM
b b