Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1985-08r -~er~, ~\ .-~, Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION N0. SS-08 ---'--- A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT IO IBM CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF A COPIER/DUPLICATOR. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai solicited bids for a copier/ duplicator, and the bids were opened on January 10, 1935, with the following results: Bidder Machine(s) Cost Xerox 8200 $27,535 Mat-Su Photocopy Sharp 901 (2) 15,560 IBM 60 26,960 WHEREAS, the City considers the bid from Mat-Su Photocopy to be non-responsive in that their bid was for two smaller machines, and the bid documents specified that one machine was desired, and WHEREAS, although the Xerox bid includes one year of free maintenance at a value of approximately $6,000, their machine does not meet specifications regarding duplexing capabilities, and the physical size of the machine will require major modifications to the reproduction room, and WHEREAS, the IBM machine c~eets the bid specifications in all respects, and WHEREAS, maintenance costs for the IBM and the Xerox are similar. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that a contract be awarded to IBM Corporation for the purchase of a copier/duplicator at a cost of $26,960.00, and that the City enter into a maintenance agreement with IBM per their bid. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 6th day o f February, 19 8 5. A , OM WAGONER; MAY ATTEST: ~ t elan, Ci y Clerk Approved by Finance: ~°4Q ~~ _ ~_ _; ., ~,. !' I .~ CITY OF KENA~ • ~ 210 PIDAI.00 KENAt. ALASKA X811 - -- TELEPHONE283 - 7535 MEMO T0: Renai City Council 2 . . ' %j M - _~ - i.__. FROM: Charles A. Brown, Finance Director DATE: January 23, 1985 SUBJECT: Resolution 85-08, Copier Bids As stated in Resolution No. 85-08, we received three bids on copiers. One bid was deemed to be non-responsive in that two machines, rather than one, were bid. Consideration is between Xerox and IBM. ISM XEROX Series III 8200 Model 60 Sittnificant ltesulta of Nritten Bids Price: The Xerox does not have a collator. The IBM has a 20-bin collator (40-bin would be su additional $1,360). Maintenance Cost: Xerox bid one year of free maintenance. Otherwise: Cost per awnth Copies k1,201 and up/mo. Copies 1-100,000/mo. Copies lOt1,001 and up/mo. Supplies Cost Based on.my calculations of costa, ae represented in the bids, the per copy supplies cost is: Power Requirements: Xerox did not respond Size: Duplexing: Bid specs say that machine must be able to hold letter and legal sire paper simultaneously while duplexing. Can it2 $27,535.00 $26,960.00 $501.50 $.0094 $226.25 $.008 $.019 5.0016338 $.001 - 220V 78x58x48.5 67x29.5x47.5 No Yes i I 1 ~, J ~~_ ~ ~ Resnlta of Demonstrations Duplexing: Both machines have a stack feeder, but the IBM also has a single sheet document feeder. To convert single-sided originals to duplexed copies, the Xerox requires that you (1) reverse the order of the originals, (2) run the originals through the machine, (3) unload legal paper from the machine, (4) place copies in the legal (or alternate) tray, (5) reverse the order of the originals again, and (6) run the originals through the machine again. To do this same thing on the ISM involves running the originals through one time. No reversal of the order of the originals is required. It's fully automatic. When converting 2-sided originals to duplexed copies, both systems require reloading of the copies and running *_he originals through twice. However, the Xerox requires that you empty the legal (alternate) paper tray first; the IBM does not require this. I have enclosed a checklist that was used during the demonstrations for your review. Collation: The Xerox collates in a single exit bin by placement of the seta in a staggered fashion. However, the exit bin will only hold 350 sheets (of 20 lb, stock). So, if we were collating a 40-page document, it would only hold 8 sets. The IBM has a 20-bin or 40-bin collator. The City is considering the 20-bin collator. Each bin will hold 100 sheets. A separate feature allows you to collate more than 20 sets - the machine inserts a Legal sheet of paper between the sets in each bin. Therefore, in the 20-bin collator, you could collate 40 seta of a 40-page document (two sets would go in each bin). This would require running the originals through twice (but, using the stack feeder, this simply means placing the originals in the feeder tray twice). Oper$ting Costs: For analysis purposes, let's assume that the City makes 40,000 copies per aonth (this is close to current usage): XEROX IBM Maintenance: Monthly charge $501.50 $226.25 Use charge - 320.00 Total Maintenance 501.50 546.25 Supplies: 40,000 x .0016338 65.35 - 40,000 x .001 - 40.00 Grand Total (excl. paper) 566.85 586.25 The operating cost difference is immaterial. In fact, if we assume the monthly usage is 60}000 copies, the total cost of the IBM becomes $10/mo. less than the Xerox. Other Considerations: 1 The City will have to relocate the blueprint cabinet if we buy the Xerox. In addition, about 4 feet of the counter will have to be cut out. The IBM will fit as is. 2) The IBM will feed computer-size paper automatically. The Rerox will not; we would have to place the computer paper one sheet at a time on the glass. This will be very inefficient when copying a large document, such as the monthly financial report that the Council receives. 3) The IBM has an interrupt feature which allows you to stop a large run to let another employee take, let's say, a single copy; then the large run picks up where it left off. The Rerox will not do this. 4) The IBM produces a single copy (the first copy) in 4.5 seconds. The Xerox takes 11 seconds to produce 1 copy. Conclusions: 1~ Based upon the bid prices (considering the 20-bin collator for the IBM), and after deducting $b,018 from the Rerox price for one year of free maintenance, the Xerox is $21,517. The IBM is $2b,9b0. The Xerox is $5,443 less expensive. 2) Operating costa are virtually the same. 3) The Xerox does not meet the specifications, or the City's needs, with regard to method of duplexing documents. 4) The City does not have apace in Citq Hall to relocate the blueprint machine. Also, we do not have excess counter apace in the reproduction room. S) The IBM appears to be simpler to use, faster, smaller, and technologically advanced over the Xerox. Feco~endatioa: Award the bid to IBM. To respond to the Xerox representative's questions at the January 16, 1985 Council meeting: 1) IBM price - $26,960 or $28,576? The higher figure includes the 40-bin collator, rather than the 20-bin, and a copy control (counter). The City does not desire these accessories. 2) Duplexing? Hopefully, the duplexing features of both machines are explained above, plus in tt-e attached checklist of the demonstrations. 3) Demonstration? The representative was correct. The IBM Model 60 that was demonstrated did not have a stack feeder. Since then, two City employees went to Anchorage to view a Model 60 with the stack feeder. We did not feel that tills was n2ceassry, but it was the only way to answer the question that he posed to Council. 4) Modifications to reproduction room? We believe that the Xezox will require the modifications, se stated above. 5) If we buy IBM, will we require that they set up and demonstrate? Yes. t DSKONSTFJITIONB OF COPIERS - JANUARY 22 6 23, 1985 XSROB ~: 1) Can it duplex with the stack feeder? Yes 2) Can it duplex with the stack feeder, using multiple 2-sided originals, ' without running the copies through twice? No 2) a) Do you have to reverse the order of the originals to duplex 2-sided ---. originals using the stack feeder? No 3) Can it duplex with the stack feeder, ~._-: using multiple 1-sided originals, without running the copies through twice? No ~, - 3) a) Do you have to reverse the order of the originals to duplex 1-sided originals using the stack feeder? Yes ;'F' 4) Caa it duplex 1 2-sided original without running the copy through twice? No `. ~ S) Can it duplex with both letter and legal =',° paper in holding trays at the same time? No 6) Will it collate 40 sets? Yes . ' 6) a) In one pass of the originals? Yes 7) Is it capable of collating 40 sets of ' S0 each (2,000 sheets)? Yes 7) a) Without emptying the exit tray '' ~~ or bins? No `°'' 8) Will the machine (IBM with 20 bin) fit '` ~; ~ through a 34" doorway? Yea IB?i Yes No No Yes No Yea Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes