HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1985-66_ __._ ____ ~ ~ _ =z-- _. r -zr _._ ~ .~-. _~ ~_~F__.
l'
_ _ _ -,~ ~
~ - 1 ~'~ i-
Suggested by: Administration
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION N0. 85 - 66
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES TO WINCE, CORTHELL, BRYSDN FDR
THE PROJECT ENTITLED, "INLET WOODS SUBDIVISION" FOR A
NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $173,b85.00.
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai received proposals from the following
firms:
Oceantech
Dowling-Rice ~ Associates/Keith E. Kernan & Associates
Wince-Corthell-Bryson
a
WHEREAS, Oceantech's proposal was for surveying work only and was
therefore non-responsive to the Request for Proposals, and
WHEREAS, the Puhlic Works Department feels that it is in the best
interest of the City of Kenai to award this pro3ect to
Wince-Corthell-Bryson, and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are appropriated. ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i
KENAI, ALASKA, that a contract be awarded for Construction
Management, Inspection, and Construction Surveying Services to
Wince-Corthell-Bryson for the pro3ect entitled, "Inlet Woods
Subdivision" for a not-to-exceed amount of $173,685.00.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 19th day
of June, 1985.
TOM~WAGONER~(MAYOR
ATTEST:
~(~irt~
~~fiet Whelan, City Clerk ~~,~
Approved by Finance: -~~~1_
June 14, 1985
CITY OF KENAI
ass FIDALGO KENAI. ALASKA 9E811
- - TELEPHONE X88- 753b
MEMORANDUM
TO: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Director /'~
PROM: Jack l.aShot, City Engineer
RE: Inlet Woods Subdivision - Surveying, Pro,~ect Management
The following firms submitted proposals for the referenced services:
Pirm
Oceantech
Nat-To-Exceed
b45,000 (surveying only)
Wince-Corthell-6ryson/
McLane d~ Associates 173,685
Dowling-Rine d~ Assoc./
Keith E. Kernan d~ Assoc. 173,000
Oceantech submitted a proposal for the surveying portion only and indicated
their engineering department would be too busy to provide engineering and
inspection. We did ask for a full proposa3 in the Request for Proposals
sent out. I am also skeptical whether the surveying could be accomplished
far their anticipated fee.
Of the other two proposals submitted, I would recommend the selection of
Wince-Corthell-Bryson/McLane A Assoc, to do the work. it has previously
been recommended that McLane A Assoc. not be in a decision-making capacity
for this project, therefore they intend to perform only surveying and
quality control testing. THis combination would give the City proven
inspection capabilities and the services of the design firm to provide
surveying, testing, and design consultation. I feel this combination would
tend to offer the best fn communication and cooperation between alI
parties.
The other firm is very close in costs, however, due to the circumstances
surrounding this project I would not recommend them. Keith £. Kernan, his
son, and his brother, performed inspection for the City in the past under
another engineering firm with very good results, however.
JBI:,,jal