Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1983-070iif x Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE TERMINATION OF THE WESBET CIRCLE, WESBET SUB- DIVISION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has held a public hearing to hear comment concerning the necessity for the water, sewer, and gravel road improvements, and the proposed assessments relating to such improvements, on Wesbet Circle in Wesbet Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Council finds it desirable to terminate the proposed project and assessment district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the assessment district for water, sewer, and gravel road improvements on Wesbet Circle is terminated. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of May, 1983. ATTEST: "Janet Whelan, City Clerk Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 83-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE WESBET CIRCLE, WESBET SUB- DIVISION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai has held a public hearing to hear comment concerning the necessity for the water, sewer, and gravel road improvements, and the proposed assessments relating to such improvements, on Wesbet Circle in Wesbet Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Council finds it desirable to continue with the proposed project and assessment district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: Section 1: The water, sewer, and gravel road improvements on Wes e�i'rcle are necessary and of benefit to the properties to be assessed. Section 2: The assessment district has not been objected to by owners of properties bearing 50% or more of the estimated costs to be borne by property owners. Section 3: An accounting shall be kept of the costs of these moments, and after all costs are known, the City Manager shall prepare an assessment roll for the improvements. It is estimated that 92% of the costs of the improvements may be assessed against the benefited properties. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 18th day of May, 1983. ATTEST: Janet Whelan, City lerk CITY OF KENAI P. O. SOX 510 KENAI. ALASKA 99411 TELEPHONE 283 • 7535 March 1, 1983 REPORT TO CITY CGUNCIL From: William J. Brighton Re: Wesbet Circle, Wesbet Subdivision On January 26, 1983, the City received a petition from Wesley E. 6 Elizabeth E. Warren for water, sewer, and gravel road improvements along Wesbet Circle in Wesbet Subdivision. The improvements would benefit 7 lots , Lots 5 through 11. Wesbet Circle is to be a new road ending in a cul-de-sac that extends off Haller Street. The City expects to improve Haller Street this summer. If the City were to form this assessment district, we possibly could obtain a change -order through the contractor on the Haller Street project and make this protect (Wesbet Circle) a part of the larger project. A DEC grant has already been applied for on the Haller project, and if it is granted, the water and sewer portion of Wesbet Circle would also be eligible (based upon the change -order situation explained above). The City agrees with the scope of the proposed project because it is the same scope as the Haller Street project. The City estimates that the cost of the water and sewer improvements would be about $20,000 and the cost of the road improvements would be about $5,000 (including ^ngineering and inspection). At this point, since we have not received a grant from DEC for the water and sewer portion of the project, we should assume that the assessment will be based upon the full cost of the project being assessed (up to the maximum provided by law, or 25Z of fair market value). We estimate that we could assess $23,000 of the $25,000 project cost, or 92%. At this time, I am recommending non -approval of the formation of this assessment district. The reasons for this recommendation are: i NOW 1) The City has developed, or should develop, a policy that no assessment districts will be formed until the City Charter concerning the 25% limitation is changed. While the limitation has little effect on the amount that could be assessed in this case, it usually has a much greater effect. A policy should be based upon the normal situation where the limitation is highly restrictive. 2) There is no apparent need for the City to become involved in the project. The prop3sed improvements are of benefit to only one owner, not to a group of owners who need the City's help in forming a distr.ct and accomplishing the work. The scope of the project is such that it would seem that the owner could make the improvements without the City's involvement. It is necessary that, within 30 days after this report is presented to you, we file a preliminary assessment roll with the City Clerk. It is also necessary that, within 30 days of the filing of the preliminary assessment roll, the Council set a date of Public Hearing. We intend to have a resolution on the April 6, 1983 agenda setting a hearing date of May 18, 1983. WJB/JB I _ J r 1 March 17, 1983 a PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL � WESBET CIRCLE, WESBET SUBDIVISION 25% Limit- Approx. Project Proposed Lot sq. ft. Lot Value Cost/Lot Assessment 1 5 9,065 $ 11,800 $ 3,196 $ 2,950 6 9,000 11,700 3,173 2,925 7 9,230 12,000 3,254 3,000 8 9,600 12,500 3,384 3,125 9 11,650 15,000 4,107 3,750 10 12,000 15,500 4,230 3,875 _ 11 10,370 13,500 3,656 3,375 70,915 S 92,000 25 000 $ 23.000 0 Owners: Wesley E. and Elizabeth E. Warren P. 0. Box 116 Kenai, Alaska 99611