HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION 1977-53
~•.
a..,
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 7?-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, PRO-
VIDING FOR WAIVER OF PENALTY AND FORECLOSURE ACTION RELATIVE TO
PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO WATER AND SEWER ASSESSMENTS OWNRD BY
CROW!J DEVELOPERS .
WHEREAS, Crown Developers have petitioned the Council by letter dated
March 30, 1977 and incorporated herein by reference for waiver of penalty
and foreclosure action on water and sewer assessment payments due April 1,
1977, on their properties, and
WHEREAS . such a waiver of penalty and foreclosure action appears appropriate
under the circumstances due to the large number of parcels involved.
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Kenai,
Alaska, that Crown Developers are hereby granted a waiver of penalty and fore-
closure action until August 30, 197?, for all properties held in their name as
of January 1, 1977 .
PASSED by the Council of the City of Kenai, Alaska, this 6th day of April, 197?.
ATTEST:
S C. Peter, City Clerk
~ ~a
March 30, 1977
-~
CROW] AEVELOPERS
345 47est 6th, Suite 202
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
City of Kenai
Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Attn: Mr. John Wise, City Manager
Dear Mr. Wise:
Please consider this a formal request to defer payment on
assessments due on our lots located in PRommsen Subdivision and
an adjoining 77 acres. Main points for this request are outlined
as follows:
(1) We formed a partnership with Bob Dow, Sr. dba B.O.B.,Corp.
to develop Mommsen Subdivision and ad3oining 77 acres.
We thereby assumed his liabilities but a title report at
that time failed to show a law suit with a Lis Pendens
or the pending water and sewer assessments.
(2) The Lis Pendens served to cloud the title and stopped
any further development. No sales means no revenue.
(3) Mr. Bob Dow, Sr., has now died.
(4) The law suit is scheduled to go to court on May 2, 1977.,
thereby clearing title and allowing us to resume develop-
ment. _
(5) Small Business Administration has a loan outstanding and
has agreed to give us a moratorium on payment of install-
ments thru September 10, 1977 - per attached letter to
S.B.A. and their reply.
Once we obtain clear title, we propose to sell existing
improved lots and bring all creditors current, then improve all
unimproved land. We have builders ready to build.
The result will be increased housing and increased tax revenues.
Construction alone will give some benefit to the Kenai community.
We request a deferment of assessments and that the 10% penalty
not be applied through August 30, 1977. This deferment would allow
court action and thus with a clear title we could either borrow the
funds or sell sufficient lots to bring our account current. In the
extreme instance the May 2nd court hearing does not remove the cloud
!~ -- 1~ - - - ----- - ----- ----
E
~__
I~
-----------T -- __ - ~ ~._- --~- _ _ ~ --~
,~..,
r-.
City of Kenai -2- March 30, 1977
on the title, the period from May 2 to August 30. would give us
adequate time to liquidate other assets. In any event, if the
City can give us some additional time, we will bring our account
current.
V;e/fr~~y.truly yo/urs
CROri~l DEVELOPERS
Kenneth R. Padgett
KRP/t
Enclosures
~~
.~1Cl::::r~r ~ i, ~ '77
Small 'Yuri^r^. ~ Acirit~~;^.rrztion
Anchoraf•e L~•;• el l.t_utc•r, :'::.~t~ .'t?
Attention : ''.r. rcla:in ". ;)reycr
Gentlemen:
--~ - ~ --_ -a--..~
Re£erence:SBA Loan X352009-0002
B.O.B. Corporation
Pursuant to our conversation of this date I submit the fo'tlowing
information for your consideration.
In `~ovenber, 1975. Crown Developers (hereinafter referred to as
Crown) entered into a limited partnership with B.O.B. Corporation
(throu~-h Bob Dow, Sr.) on the basis of a one month old title report
zhowins-, i3.0.R., Corporation i~r title. for the purchase of the F:enai
property covered by your SBA loan referertcc'cl above. (i+r.. now. Sr.
•aas ill at that time and has since become both mentally and physic-
ally incapacitated.) Crown was to bc~ the general partner and B.O.B.
Corporation t!ie limited partner. Crown was to make the SBA payments.
nay ot:~er obligations due. and continue with the development and
eventual sale of. the propeer~cy In the suimner of 1976 Crown sold
three lot : to ..°tn]? Con3t-ructio+~ •~'to n~itai.nccl a title report which
showPCT for the firKt tiMQ a iii nende;~~s. Thp basis of the lis pendene
was a cti:~a,~ reesten~ u.:Cw~.~en ~~~urt. .,uiluers and B.O.I3. , Corporation
which hat! arisan in =1ie su~u7er cif 1975. In the interest of carrying
on the business with as little interruption as nosaible, Craven decided
to attempt a settlPmer.t with S'rort ^ui.lders. Short Builders has
twice a;;reect to a settlement and then backed out when the offer was
met. They have subsequently raised their claim from an oripiaal
$20,~~9 to ^6q,000. ThA Matter is in the courts at this time. In
t'rr ^:eantir~~ gown has spent nearly $19~,BOG in payments, taxes
anti local i'ees in atteu:atia,T t.~, scttl.c this matter.
Bepi.nninfc in September. 1976, Crown could no longer keep up with
t1tP f. inancial loaf and the SBA payments became delinquent. Stoll
Construction filed suit against Crown and others for $30,000 in
losses ant: $~~^,,~04 in punitive darnaj;es. Crown requested the court
to allow Crown to ;+ost a bond ant'. release 3 lets to Stoll Construction.
The court granted the release. Short Builderu appealed to the Supreme
Court, whic'n last week dismissed the ai~peal. Our attorney advisee
t'tat the case will be. tried in the early spring .
0~
_ _ _ T~ r
~~
Sma11 itusiness Aclr:iinistration -2- January 18, 1977
Due to the slow process in tryin;; to het our case before att over-
crowded court calendar. and due to titp immense amount of funds
Crown has paid out atteniptinY to cie~rnd what aec~rns to be a
frivolous clai~: by ~~raar. co'~o keeps increasing; demrui4s, we
ask your coonerati~n in .~s:;i~ti~n ''m•r~ i~~ '~rin~-inp t'iis problem
to a~ c~~nc L~i:a io:~ .
t+ie ask a deferral of payments until August 30, 1977. at which time
the amount due will be approximately X3:1,000. That should give us
adequate time to have had the necessary court dates and a reasonable
time for t'te .j~±doe to rAnder a final decision.
It is our desire to cooperate with you in any manner we can. We
appreciate the consideration you have given our problem.
Very truly yours,
CR061?1 DT:V~LOPT•.RS
K. J. Padgett
KJP/t
f
---------7_ --~ --- ---_ -._ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _
h
! ~~wl sit 1.1.5. SMAt_L BU51f~k`.5 .aJMINISTRATION
•.. ~. ,,d~ 1u~ hur.i: ~ 1 . r .I r r.drr
;/\ ~ `f.
~ ~7`" ~O 11111. 1\. 1.~1. 1~.•~.~~.
~ January 24, 1977
Ms. K. J. Padgett
Crown Developers
345 W. 6th Ave., Suite "103
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: B.O.B. Corporation
DL 352 009 00 02
Dear Ms. Padgett:
As rtEquercted in your letter of January 18, 1977, we have deferred the
installments on referenced loan due September 10, 1976 through
August 10, 1977 to September 10, 1977.
~ On September 10, 1977, 13 installments at 52,750 totaling 535,750 will
be due. Regular monthly installments will resume on October 10, 1977
in the amount of $2,750 each. All other terms and conditions of the;
loan remain unchanged.
.,
We trust this deferment will provide the financial relief you need and
that you will be able to resume payments as scheduled.
Sincerely,
Bettye F. Graham
~ Loan Servicing Assistant
41,puUUy~
v r~~
u
d z
W6
. ~.tr~.
I ~'
~_i
_~ - ~ ..