The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-03-13 Airport Commission Packet KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION MARCH 13, 2003 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' ITEM 2' ITEM 3: ITEM 4: ITEM 5: ITEM 6: ITEM 7: ITEM 8: ITEM 9: ITEM 10: b, ITEM 11: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL AGENDA APPROVAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES- February 13, 2003 PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD OLD BUSINESS Discussion-- Airport Land Values/Possessory Interest Discussion-- Airport Marketing Survey NEW BUSINESS REPORT Commission Chair Airport Manager City Council Liaison COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD INFORMATION ITEMS Kenai City Council Meeting Action Agendas for February 19 and March 5, 2003. Airport Alert: Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program Kenai Municipal Airport 2003 Monthly Enplanement Report Kenai Municipal Airport Manager's Monthly Report - 2 / 13 / 03 Primary Airport Enplanement Activity Summary for CY2000 Kenai Municipal Airport Master Plan- Executive Summary ADJOURNMENT KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- January 10, 2003 ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5: OLD BUSINESS Discussion -- Airport Survey Discussion -- Flat Tax on Private aircraft Discussion-- Appraised Airport Land Values ITEM 6: NEW BUSINESS ITEM 7: REPORT Commission Chair Airport Manager City Council Liaison ITEM 8: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND OUESTIONS ITEM 9: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 10: INFORMATION ITEMS be de Kenai City Council Meeting Action Agendas for January 15 and February 5, 2003. 12/02 and 1/03 Kenai Municipal Airport Monthly Enplanement Reports Public Service Announcement regarding Commission's discussion on proposed flat-tax ordinance. 1/20/03 Avis letter regarding proposed ordinance pertaining to off-airport car rental operations. ITEM 11: ADJOURNMENT KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. CHAIRMAN HENRY KNACKSTEDT~ PRESIDING MINUTES ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairman Knackstedt called the meeting to order at 7'02 p.m. Roll was called and confirmed as follows: Members Present' Members Absent: Others Present: Knackstedt, Watkins, Haralson, Kleidon Holloway, Bielefeld, Van Zee Councilman Bookey, Airport Manager Cronkhite, Department Assistant Harris ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL The agenda was unanimously approved as presented. ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- January ! 0, 2003 The minutes were unanimously approved as written. ITEM 4' PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None ITEM 5: OLD BUSINESS Discussion -- Airport Survey Airport Manager Cronkhite provided a brief recap of the purpose and intent of the survey and stated Council has requested a more inclusive request for proposal, i.e. provide an itemized list of points for the marketing study. Cronkhite requested the Commission refer to the list of items previously compiled during the joint work session held on October 15, 2002. The Commission discussed whether or not a contractor is required to conduct an inventory of physical assets. Haralson stated he felt this aspect wouldn't need to be performed by a contractor, as part of a list already exists in the Master Plan. Cronkhite stated she feels a contractor could provide an unbiased outside view and could perhaps recognize items not already listed in the Master Plan. Additionally, she stated her understanding of compiling a list of assets should include more than buildings and look into other potential assets. The Master Plan doesn't address land development issues. The Commission and Cronkhite discussed overall land availability and whether or not land outside the fence is considered to be an asset. Councilman Bookey stated he feels all airport land, whether inside the fence or not, is an asset and should be considered. He further stated the marketing study should incorporate all airport-related lands and land that is developed; developed but vacant; developed and occupied; and, undeveloped as all are physical assets. Councilman Bannock concurred. P~ul Landis, Senior Vice President, ERA Aviation -- Landis addressed the Commission and asked them if they felt familiar with the Airport Master Plan. Landis stated it seemed they had a hard time getting traction on the survey and he felt the purpose of the study is to help prepare the Master Plan. Landis suggested the Commission obtain Master Plans from airports of like size and geography to better develop ideas. Additionally, Landis suggested hiring someone to update the Master Plan rather than spend countless hours and dollars on a consultant to prepare a marketing survey. Cronkhite responded to Landis's suggestions and comments by stating she would gladly obtain sample Master Plans for the Commission's review by contacting the Association of Small/Medium Airports. Additionally, Cronkhite stated the Master Plan is an FAA mandated document mostly deals with property only inside the fence. Cronkhite stated Kenai has a very unique situation due to owning so much marketable property that is beyond what the FAA requires to be noted in the Master Plan. Haralson asked if Council required information on developing a marketing plan for all of the airport areas, including land outside the fence, or just the airport itself. Bookey and Bannock stated it was their understanding to devise a development program to mesh both. Bookey suggested the Commission hold off reviewing criterion until after the February 20 work session regarding the fiscal situation, as there may be other Council requests or directions given. Chairman Knackstedt requested the Commission take time to prioritize the items on the list; but to also table this item until next month as the Council may provide additional direction. There were no objections. BREAK TAKEN: BACK TO ORDER: 7:48 P.M. 7:55 P.M. 5-b. Discussion -- Flat Tax on Private aircraft Shane Horan, KPB Assessors Office -- Horan addressed the Commission and explained how borou§h taxes are assessed and stated he is aware of taxation disparities between communities within the Kenai Peninsula Borou§h. Horan was asked what would happen if Kenai were to institute a fiat tax; he stated the Borou§h would need to make chan§es to their assessin§ system, which would take time. Horan su§§ested the Commission invite Borou§h Finance Director Sinz to help clarify tax KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 PAGE 2 policy. From Horan's estimates, a flat tax would provide $3,300 in revenue compared to the current $5,800. These figures are based on 44 private aircraft. Bannock stated he sponsored the resolution which would amend KMC 7.05.010 to provide a flat tax on personal property to $75.00 as a way to promote discussions and perhaps stop rhetoric and misconceptions surrounding aircraft taxation issues. Bannock provided the following: · The key issue involving aircraft taxation is perception and fairness. · It i~ a myth that people leave the Kenai Airport due to taxe~. · Owners of boats and other property will be asking for exemptions. Where do you draw the line? · The borough has created an inequitable standard. · If a flat tax were instituted, the borough would simply increase another tax to make up the difference. Any savings would be an illusion. · Kenai has lost business to the Matanuska-Susitna Borough due to a competition problem. · The ordinance was sponsored to promote discussion and perhaps stop rhetoric and misconceptions regarding aircraft taxation. · The City of Kenai cannot afford to offer the tax exemption like the borough can. · The way to solve the problem is to get the borough to rid itself of their exemption ordinance. Joe Harris, Kenai -- Harris stated he is a boat owner and keeps one boat in Homer and one in Kenai and is in favor of a flat tax. Harris explained, his boat in Homer is larger and worth more, but taxes there are lower. He added, he would most definitely be pushing for a flat tax on boats in the event a flat tax on aircraft is instituted. MOTION: Commissioner Kleidon MOVED to request the Airport Manager forward the draft ordinance for Council review and invite the Borough and City Finance Directors to the next meeting for further taxation clarification. Commissioner Watkins SECONDED the motion. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Commissioner Haralson MOVED to amend the motion by adding, the Airport Commission recommends Council review portion "D" in the draft ordinance. Commissioner Watkins SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. Discussion -- Appraised Airport Land Values KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 PAGE 3 Cronkhite addressed the Commission by requesting review of a memorandum (included in the packet) from Julie Derry of Derry and Associates. The memo states Kenai has higher land values due to the airport being located in the bUsiness district, which adds commercial exposure and has water, sewer, and natural gas. Derry added, land values are based on the whole appraisal process. Bannock stated he felt there is much more to the higher land values in Kenai than what is outlined in the memo. Bannock stated, Kenai as a whole, has a much more complex infrastructure including a fully functioning airport and tower; one of the best fire departments in the state, including a fully manned fire station at the airport; and a high number of police officers. Shane Horan, KPB Assessing-- Horan provided a brief explanation of possessory interest and reversionary methods in regard to land values. ITEM 6: NEW BUSINESS -- None ITEM 7: REPORT 7-a. Commission Chair-- None 7-b. Airport Manager -- Airport Manager Cronkhite reported the following: The Transportation Security Administration agents arrived for an inspection and brought Boeing consultants. The agents looked into full passenger screening. Additionally, the 300-foot rule has been reinstated due to the nation being placed in orange alert status. · Baggage screening at the Kenai Airport is being discussed. · The FAA certification agents came for an inspection. · The Alaska Runway Safety Action Team suggested additional signage on the runway. 7-c. City Council Liaison- Councilman Bookey reported the following: · There will be a work session regarding the budget on February 20, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. Bookey encouraged all to come. Reminded the Commission of Bannock's new appointment and stated he would be missed. ITEM 8: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS Haralson stated he enjoyed reading comments from the last meeting and inquired as to the status of the off-airport car rentals. Bookey informed him, at this point administration is looking into the issue. Haralson suggested efforts be applied in tightening up language to provide clarification to terms such as 'concession fee' and ~taxation.' KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 PAGE 4 ITEM 9: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD --None ITEM 10: INFORMATION ITEMS 10-a. 10-b. 10-¢. 10-d. Kenai City Council Meeting Action Agendas for January 15 and February 5, 2003. ! 2 / 02 and 1 / 03 Kenai Municipal Airport Monthly Enplanement Reports Public Service Announcement regarding Commission's discussion on proposed flat-tax ordinance. 1/20/03 Avis letter regarding proposed ordinance pertaining to off-airport car rental operations. ITEM 11: ADJOURNMENT' The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Minutes prepared and transcribed by: Sharon M. Harris, Department Assistant KENAI AIRPORT COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2003 PAGE 5 nal Municipnl. Airport Memo To: From: Airport Commission Rebecca Cronkhite - Airport Manager Date: Mamh 6, 2003 Subject: Possessory Interest During the February 13 Airport Commission meeting, them was a discussion of airport land lease values. Shane Homn, Kenai Peninsula Borough Assessor, shared some information on how taxes are calculated on lease property. Mr. Horan has provided the attached document, which I think might be of interest. www. ci. kenai.ak, us. §29.45.030 ALASKA STA~ §29.45.030 (b) Compliance with the provisions o~ this section is a prerequisite to receipt ot~ municipal tax resource equalLr~tion assistance under AS 2~.60.010 - 2~.60.080 and state aid for miscellaneous municipal services under AS 2~.60.100- 29.60.180. The , department shall withhold annual allocations under those sections until municiual of Hcials demonstrate that the requirements of this section have been met. ~ 12 ch 74 SLA 1985) Sec. 29.45.030. ~ (a) T~e following property is exempt from general taxation: (1) municipal property, including property held by a public ration of a municipality, or state property, exceut that corpo . ..~vate Teasehold, contract, oro~r interest in the (A) ,, ,, -- o ertv is ta~the~interest: er provision o~ law, property acquired by an agency, corporation, or other entity oi: the state through l~oredosure or deed in lieu oi: l~oreclosuTM and retained as an investment ol~.a state entity is taxable; ~ subparagraph does not apply to £ederal land granted to the University o[ Alas~ under AS I4.40.380 or 14.40.390, or to other land granted to universiW by the state to replace land that had been granted under ~t~ 14.40.380 or 14.40.390; (C) an ownership interest ot~ a municipality in real property located outside the rnunicipal~tT'acquired alter December 31, 1990, is by another munidpality; however, a borou§h not tax an taxable may interest in real property located tn the borough and owned by a city tn that borough; (2) household ~urniture and personal el%cts oi~ members oi~ a household;. (3) property used exclusively ~or nonproi:it religious, cha~table, cemetery, hospital, or educational purposes; (4) property oi~ a nonbusiness organiza~on composed entirely ol= persons with 90 days or more ot~ active service m the armed forces oi~ the United States whose conditions o~ service and separation were o~er than dishonorable, or the property ot: an auxiliary o[that organization; (~) money on deposit; (~) the teal property oi~ certain resid_en?.ot~ the .s. tate to the extent and subiect to the conditions provided in (e) o1~ t/~ se~on; (77 real property or an interest in real property ~at ts exempt h-om taxation under 43 U.S.C. 1620(d), as amended; DEFINITION AND NATURE OF POSSESSORY INTEREST Taxable possessory interests are private property interests in publicly owned real property. In the early 1850's and 1860's tffie too mu~ ~ff Cal~mia's land had not been perf~~l, and the settlers had attained a dght of possession and corrtrol through settlement, possession, and use of the propert% The a.~~ment rolls in many oounfies in those ea~ year~ mnsist~d in ver~ large part of possesso~7 interests. A possessory interest con--es a private dght to the possession and use of publicly owned. property for a pedod of time less ~an percetu~. It is. a portion of the bundle of dght~ that would normally be included in fee ownership, and its value therefore is normally something less than the value in percetu~ of the whole bundle. F~ ownemhip is d~n~ as absolute ownem'hi¢ unencumbered by any other interest, subject only to the limitations imposed by the govemm~tai powem of taxation, eminent domain, police power and es~eat. Some people feet that, because the fee is in public ownership, no taxes should be paid, even though ~e dght to present use and po.~ession is prhtat~ly held. It is tree that no taxes am legally assessable on the portion of. the estate' remaining in the public agency, but our Const~tion and mom than a hundred yearn of ~u~tom clea~ provide that prhtat~ e~ in publicly owned property are subject to property taxation. *There is a gmat deal of mixed emotion surrounding the taxation of possessory interests. Some people feet that, because the fee is in public ownership, no taxes should be paid. In the converse, many people feel ~at lessees of this property use the same services and compete with pdva~ owners in the market place, and therefore should be subject to taxation in the same manner as owners of comparable property. Numerous programs in the State of Alaska at both the State and Local levels have added to the list of publicly owned lands now being enjoyed by the private sector. Private 'leases, homesite permits and recreational entries are just a few of the programs that award an individual the exclusive right to enjoy the use of government owned property. The basic justification for the exemption of government owned property is derived from the concept that the taxpayer and taxing jurisdiction are one and the same, basically the public. Initially, this was sound logic, however, over a pedod of time our complex society has distorted this concept to ~e point where many non-public entities are enjoying tax-exempt status and forcing the burden of support for local services to be shifted to offer taxpayers. The term 'possessory interest' is not a unique Alaskan term that is applied to leasehold interests for ad valorem purposes. It was originally coined in California. California issued the odginal manual on possessory interests in 1955. In December 1955, the California State Supreme Court upheld the theories and principles of possessory intem~ in it's unanimous decision in DeLuz Homes vs San Di o Cou (1955), Cal. 2d 546. The court subsequently reaffirmed the DeLuz Homes decision in the Texas Company vs County of Los An.qeles (1959), 52 Cal. 2d 55, and in Forste_~r Shipbui!din.q Co., Inc= vs County of Los Anqeles (1960), 54.Cal. 2d 450. R:~Shn~%W~nmminp P I I.n' Alaska has adopted the use of the "possessory interest' concept in all Municipalities for ad valorem purposes. Alaska Statute 29.45.110 requires that the assessor value property at its full and true value. It further states that the definition of full and true value is the estimated., price that the property would bdng in an open market between a willing buyer and willing seller both-' being knowledgeable of the property' under the current market conditions. This portion of ~e state law dealing with assessments' tends to confuse some individuals, when applied to' possessory inte~. It should be noted that the sta~ do not mandate the assessor to utilize any one valuation method over another nor does it defoe which method Should be used in- valuing possesson/interest in tax-exempt property, it simply states that the lessee's interest is taxable to 'The exte~ of the interest". Article IX, Section 5 of the ConstittYdon of the State of Alaska says, 'Private leaseholds, contracts or inte~~ in land or property owned or held by the United States, the State or its political subdivisions, shall be taxable to the extent of those inte~.' Also, AS 29.45.030 says: '(A) The following property is exempt from generat taxation: (1) Municipal, state or federally owned property, except that private leaseholds, contracts or other interests in the property shall be taxable to the extent of those interests.' Burden of Proo~ The taxpayer has the burden of proving that the property is exempt from taxation. This well established principle was reiterated in Greater An~om,qe Area Bomu.qh vs Siste~ of Charity when the Naska Supreme Court said that a taxpayer claiming a tax exemption has the burden of showing that the property is eligible for the exemption. As stated by the Supreme Court in the Sisters of Charity case, the courts must narrowly construe statutes granting tax exemption. A flexible or generous reading of pertinent constitutional and statuto~ provisions cannot be allowed when dealing with the principles of fairness asso~ with uniform taxation. The court similarly held in McKee vs Evans where the court stated that provisions exempting property from ad valorem taxation must be strictly construed against the property holder and in favor of the taxing authority. Posse~-~ion i~ Nine.Tenths of the Law:. The right of possession, granted by some type of arrangement between the government and an individual, may give that individual the right to enter upon and possess the property. They have numerous other rights, such as the right to clear that land, the right to live on the property, or to plant a garden, or t~ farm, or operate a business on the property. They may have the right to protect the property and to exclude trespassers or expel intruders. They may also prohibit State Troopers or other government officials from searching the property without a search warrant. They can also prevent the government from granting 1~ another applicant the dght to possess and occupy the subject p?perty w.hile ~e arrangement is. in .forceL _'l'h_ '_.~_~,o~_o~ ..n_'g~h~_~ accompanying the rights of possessmn snows Why possessmn Bundle of Rights. Influencinq Factors of Value: The ownership of real estate may be compared to a 'bundle of sticks' which represents" all the property rights' inherent in the ownership of real property. Each stick represents a separate and distinct property right or privilege of ownership. The appraisal of mai property is not solely an evaluation of bricks and mortar, but it is an evaluation of the property dghts existing in the property and the extent of interest the owner has in the property.. In a letter dated November 30, 1987 to Ms. Barbara Steckel, Chief Fiscal Officer for the Municipality of Anchorage, Michael Worley, State Assessor sta~, 'Since 1979,' it has been the position of this office that of the three methods which are generally u'diized in valuing leasehold inte~, the only one which complies with ArtiCle IX, Section 5'of the Alaska Constitution is the reversionary method. The reversionary method of valuation' yields the estimated market value of the property rights which-are held by the lessee- The property rights held by the lessor are not taxable and, ~emfom, are not included in the valuation estimate. This use of reversionary method has recently been affirmed in November, 2000 by the State Supreme Court in" Fairbanks North Star Bomu.qh Assessor's office vs. Golden Heart UflTdJes, Inc. Reversionary Method Estimated Value in Fee Simple Term - 5 Year Rate 8% Value of Reversion (Reverts back to KPB, City, State, Feds) $100,000 .680583 <$68,058> Taxable Possessory Interest (rd) $31,900 8% Annual Table 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 :ti 23 2,1 31 :37 3H 39 40 41 .12 43 45 47 48 49 51 52 53 58 56 Amoamt of' 1 1.080 000 l.lfi6 400 1.~_59 ?l:t 1,.360 1.469 1.586 1.?13 1.8S0 1.999 2.158 489 328 874 80°4 930 003 90.3 2.331 639 2.518 I?0 ~?19 624 2.93? 194 3.172 169 $.4~ 943 3.700 018 3.996 019 4.315 ?01 4.660 957 5.033 834 5.436 540 &a?l 464 6.341 6.~46 475 7,396:353 7.988 o61 9.317 Io. o62 607 1(I.867 669 11.7:37 1183 IL.* flTfi 000 13.fim~ 13.1 14.?&5 344 13..q6tJ 172 I ?.245 626 '.NL 115 21.,'2.4 521 *.3.462 4H3 :t5.339 4ti2 2?.365 640 29.~55 972 31.920 449 :34.4?4 085 37.L.*32 012 40.:t10 5?3 43.42? 419 46.901 613 50.fl0:3 742 54.71M O4 I 59.082 5,°4 63.ao9 12(5 68.913 85(5 74.426 965 80.381 1-'~- 86.811 51-~ 91.?M 540 101~ST 064 .s'-(l+,')- Amoum ~ I per Period 1.000 000 2.080 000 3.246 4OO 4.5O6 1 5.866 601 ?.335 10.636 14.4tm 16.640 18.977 21..195 27 2,1.214 ~0 27.132 114 :30.324 293 33.3'50 2~ 27.4~0 244 41.446 ~3 45.761 964 50.4~o'* 92ol 53.406 755 60.a93 26 66.764 7~9 73.105 940 79.954 87~0 7~ 95~36 ~0 103,~5 936 1~~ ~8 134.213 537 145.9A0 1#7.102. 148 *,**~m. OT(t 320 ,,'*~qJ.315 945 259,056 519 21Jl~781 (MO 31M.*.'43 523 1_39.~U3 005 356.949 :3146.505 617 41 &4'.'(5 067 452.9(m 152 490,132 164 530,342 5~.7T0 156 6~.671 769 671,3',3 510 728,O51 551 785,114 91?.H33' 058 I 0~,,645 144 1159.456 755 1233-'13 26 2 $ 4 5 · -- , Fund Words Words of. l Pm:sar of' I per Period Paymmu 1.000 000 .9~ 0215 .~.S 928 1.080 000 .480 769 .857' 339 1.3'83 :tgS .560 ?69 · 308 034 .~3.832 o-.577 097 .388 034 ..~! ~! .~5 OSO 2.31." 127 .:301 921 · 170456]~.680 583 3.992 7'10 .P~50456 92*29 .13fl315 .fi30170 4.fl~q~880 .216 :315 803 .112 072 .,583490 5.206 370 .192 072 628 .004 015 ~ 269 5.7.16 639 .174 015 558 .080 080 ~00 :t49 6.246 888 .1~ 0a0 562 .069 0~9 .465 195 6.710 081 .149 029 487 .O60 07(5 .4:t8883 7.1:38 964 .140 076 125 .002 ~95 .39T I ! 4 7'.356 078 . 132 695 · 0465-,-0 .267 698 ?.OOS 7'76 .12(5 · 0412097 .340 461 8.,~44 23T . !2 !297' · 056830 .315 242 8.359 479 .116 830 · 052977 .~! 890 8.851 369 .112 97T-~ · 0~ 6209 .2TO 269 9.1.*'1638 .109 62- · 025702. .~0 .049 9.371 887 .106 702 · 024128 .231 7'12 9.603 599 .104 i.O9 · 02.1 852 .'.'14 548 9.~tl# 147 .l()l 852 .019 1132 .198 656 l(J.OI6 ~03 .099 832 .Ollf032 .185 .q-ti lO.L'f)(! 744 .098 032 .018 4~ .170 :ll5 10.:37! 059 .().off .014 978' .157 699 10.5214 758 .094 978 .013 679 .146 fils !(~.674 776 .093 679 .01.~507 .135 .~f~ Itl.$O9 97# .092. 507 ' .011 448 .l'*..q liS? 10.935 165 .091 448 .010 4tl9 .115 914 11.051 07# .090 489 .009 619 .JOT 32tt l l.15tl406 .089 619 .008 IC.~ .099 377 11.*.37 783 .0Sa .(lOIf rtl? .092 01§ 11.349 799 .ol~tl107 .riot451 .fNt5.o00 11.434 999 .0147 451 .006 852 .OTB 889 11.513 ~8 .11145852 .(XMJ31)4 .f)73045 11.5H6 9:~4 .()Sd~304 .(10~IML3 .(167635 11.6:34 5(~ .OAS 803 .(mS 345 .(x~ 6~ 11.717 193 .orJ5 :545 .0O4 92.4 .057 986 11.7T5 179 .084 9*.**4 .004 53g .fl53tiSHI I I.a'.**~J a69 .084 539 .004 1#5 .lL497'13 I 1.a7~45H2 .(1~44I .003 8rio .It4~IJ31 1 !.9'..;4 ti1:3 .(1~ 860 .003 561 .IM:t621 il.967 235 .0ti3 :361 .003 287 .039 464 I~tXMi 699 .Ua3 287 .00~ 034 .036 541 I~IPI:J 2.11) .flUS 034 .00~ ~ .033 834 I'..IITTlIT4 .0b'2. .00~ 5a7 .031 328 12.111# 4(12 .OtJ2 587 .0(~ 390 .ll~ OOT I*,.* 13T 4(19 .082 .'390 .OQ~ ~08 .lj25859 1',**164267 .OtJ2 .002 0441 .02,4869 1~189 136 .082 040 .001 886 .1J23~7 12,,'12 163 .OtJl 8ti6 .001 ?43 .021 321 1',.*~233 485 .OHI 743 .001 611 .019 742 !~,.~:3 ~*T .OBI .001 490 .01# 2BI! i~,~3.1 506 .081 490 .001 3TT .UI6 90.5 12.~lf 432 .081 3TT .001 S3'4 .015 67',* I°..304 103 .081 .001 IT8 .014 511 1'*..3la614 .0111 178 .001 090 .013 436 l'*.L33:t 050 .081 090 .001 008 .012 441 I'*.L344491 .Otll 008 .000 93.* .011 '519 12.3~ 010 .080 932 .000 M:t .010 666. 1~v,66 676 .080 862 .000 798 .OOg 8'76 I'*..376552 .080 ?98 LEASE RATE/DISCOUNT .RATE Why 8% Private Sector Lease Rates I have looked at very few private sector lease rates in the Soldotna/Kenai area which have ranged from 8% to 12% to 18% of the estimated market value. Most recently, these rates have been between 8% and 10%. These leases generally have about a one to three year rent adjustment, based on the consumer pdce index or a fixed rate increase. I suspect these may remain stable. The Real Estate Division of the Alaska Railroad, as of January 1, 1992 was leasing land for 8% of the estimated market value. As interest rates and other expected rates of return have been declining, the railroad dropped their lease rate from 9% in 1987. They indicated a nationwide search found most long-term land leases in the 8% to 8.5% range. Public Sector Lease Rates The City of Seward leases land for 8% of the fee value. Kenai leases for 6%. Homer for 9%. Soldotna for 7%. The City of Petersburg leases tidelands for 6% of the estimated market value and 10% of the estimated market value for uplands. The city and Borough of Sitka leases lands at 10% of the estimated market value. In Sitka, if the lease is for a project that would stimulate the economy, an 8% rate is used. All of these cities and municipalities typically update their lease rates every five years. Market value is usually estimated by fee appraisal or local assessor's office and statutory rates are then applied. The legislated or ordained rates tend not to change to reflect market conditions. R:\Shane\Word~C~resentation~LEASE RATE-DISCOUNT RATE 2-03.doc nal Municipal Airport Memo To: From: Airport Commission Rebecca Cronkhite - Airport Manager Date: Mamh 6, 2003 Subject: Airport Marketing I Airport Master Plans Dudng the discussion of an airport marketing survey at the February 13 Airport Commission meeting, Paul Landis, Senior Vice President of Em Aviation suggested that a better approach might be to update the airport master plan. In response to this suggestion, the Commission requested master plans from several airports for review. Administration is working to obtain plans. Copies of the Kenai Airport Master Plan will be available at the March 13 meeting for Commission to examine. The airport master plan is not a marketing plan. By definition, an airport master plan "is the plannem con.pt of the long-term development of an airport... prepared to support modernization of existing airports and creation of new airports". Documentation from the F~ advisory cimular on airport mastor plans is attached for your consideration. The master planning process is an FAA requirement for funding of infrastructure development and improvements utilizing Airport Improvement Program (ALP) grant funds. The next Kenai Municipal Airport master plan updato is schodul~ for FY08. Does Commission wish to concentrate on a master plan update or continue working towards a marketing study/plan? www. ci.kenai.ak, us. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Final APfl~ to Washington National Airport 1. GENERAL. This advisor~ ckcu -lu~ (AC) provides national gvidance for the p~ps~on ~ airp~ master .p~. It ~ ~ ~d ~ ~p~ ~di~dual air- ~~r phns ~s~nt ~ the ~sions ~ the ~~ ~d ~ lm~ent A~ ~ 19~, ~ for ~~~ p~~g gen~Uy, ~e~~~ ~ Fedcr~ ~lvem~t. b. 'rids publication is intended primarily for use by the aviation community, especiaUy tho~e directly involved in preparing master plan: air- port Ol~r~ors, staffs, and their airpmt consuRants. It will also be useful to state aviation officials, airpo~ board mem~rs, mumcipal officiaJs, state/regional/ local planning personnel and the general public, all of whom are pa~1 of the airport planning pro~#. c. AC 150/5070-6, "Airport Master Plans," published in Febmazy, 1971, has guided the prepa- ration of rnas~ plans ainee enactment of the Air- port and Airway Development Act of 1970. Durin~ this period, sisnificant experience has been gained -due to the stimulus in airport planning activities provided by tills law. Over 15(X) master plarmjng pTo~ects have received Federal aid. d. Airport and related planning processes have changed. The integration of airport planning 1 with the other pJannin8 processes at ,rate and re- gionaJ §Ovemmental levels has introduced broader policy and platmin; consideratiofls. The direct iff- volvement in airport planning by, state transpmta. lion authorities and regional transportation plan- fting organizations has reinforced this chanl~e. e. The National Environmental Policy Act' of 1969 (NEPA) has significantly afl, ed airport plan. ning, requiring that environmental impacts be con- sidereal ead~ and thmug, hout the planning process. The inve~gat~ of alternative dcvelopmeflt con. ~. The Airport and Airway ImpmvementAct of ~982 responds to the atrlx~ and airway system needs o~ the eighties by providing substantial creases in £mancial assistance tot developmem and planning. Revised L'uidance for airport master pisa- runS, based.upon contemporary processes and level of piannins activities. c. To propose an ackievab]e finanOal plan to support/he implementation schedule. d. 'lb justify the plan technically, and pro- cedurally throu8h a thorough investigation of con- cepts and alternatives on technical, ecpnomic and environmental grounds. e. To present for publicconaide~,/n a con- vincin8 and candid manner, a plan which ade-~ quately addresses the isoues and satisfies local, state ;*nd Federal re~lations. ;. To documene policies and future aero- nautical demands for reference in municipal delib- erations on spending and debt in~trrenee and land use controls, e.8., subdivi~mt regulations and the erection of potential obntruction~ to air navigation. 8- To set Ute stage and establish the framework for a continuing p]annin$ process. Such a pmce~ should monitor key, conditions and ad)ust plan rec- ommendations ig require, d by chansed ci~xl~n~tatlces. ' ' 2. MASTER PLAN DEIqNmON. The airport mas- ter plan is the planner's concept of the Ions-term. development of. an .airport. It displays the concept graphically and reports the data and lostc upon which the plan is ba~-d. Mast.er plans are prepared to support modernization of existing airports and creation st new airports, tel~ard/ess of size, com- plextty, or role. 3. GOAL AND OBJECTIVE8 OF A MASTER PLAN. The goal of a master plan is to provide guidelines for future airport development which will satisfy aviation demand in a financially feasible rnannec while'at the same time resolving the avia, tion, environmental and socioeconomic issues ex- isling in ehe commun!'ty. Specific objectives are: a. To provide an effective graphic presentation of the future development of the airport and anUci- pated land uses in the ~icinity of the airport. b. lb establish a realistic schedule for the im- plementation of the development proposed in the plan, particularly for the short term capital ira. provement program.. 4. ORGANIZATION AND USE OF THE 'ADVISORY CIRCU.LAR. a. The information presented in this AC covers the planning requirements for ail airports, re- gardless of size, complexity or role. However. the scope of a study must be tailored' to Ute indlvidua~ airport, with the level o~ effort limited to its specific needs and i:m~ble~. Baled On an airport's spetiflc needs, certain master planning elements may be emphasized whi/e others will not be considered at all. b. b~ using this AC, it should be remembered that the 8ulding prindple o~ the plarmmg process is the development of a safe and efficient airport through the use of acceptable standards. c. The steps in a master plannin8 process are not necessarily mutually exclusive. There are eer- rain considerations, particularly- fmancial and en- vironmental, which must be accounted for throughout the proce~. WhUe this AC treats them in separate chapters, they ate not intended to be applied piecemeal or sequentially, but in an iterative way throughout the planning process. d. The availability of phmninG information fTOm Federal, .~tate and local governmental o~ani- zations may eliminate the need ~or developinR ~- ilar ir~ormation in the master planning et;orr. e. A ma~ter planning effort may involve only, the verificaUun o~ the currenc~ o~ avaibble informa- tion, the updal~8 si: pi~ and impJemenlation schedules, and the pmdu~on of an abbreviated L This AC does not provide in[ormation on airport design. That information is available in -rher FAA publications' which are rc/tn~nced herein. 5: INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION. a. This AC applies to U.S. au, ports with inter- nal:im:al aviation roles and may be usebal in plan- ninE airports outmJde the U.~;. Planners should be aware of the existence and applicability o~ interna- tiona! .standards and recommended practices. b. Standards and recommended practict~ for airports used in international civil aviation are pr~ muJ~,ated by the International Civil Aviation Organ- i~.ion (ICAO), headquartered in Montreal. See "Annex 14 to the convention on IntcrnationaJ Civil Aviation." ICAO also publishes, from time to time, relevant information on airport muter planning, land use and environmenta/controls, etc., which the planner may find useful CHAPTER 2. THE PLANNING PROCESS a. The airport master plannin8 p~s ifl- volves coJlecfln8 dab, forecmffn8 denmnd, deter- mining hcifity requirunent, and developin~ plans and schedule~. These steps cmmot be undertaken e~ly without understafldinS other avia6on, transportation and comprehensive planning ~ts. · b. The mast~ pfannirt8 process must consider alz~t tenm,~U and useru as well as the Gerund ~blic who ~ be affected by, its remdts. Their involvement throushrmt the master planning pm.. cess ovoids "surimses,, and helps, develop a con- sensus. Early pro, tess towards consensus off mas- ter plan recommendations can pave the wuy for effective environmental assessment and imlmct .qtatunem reviews. Public invuivement in mmter- phnmn8 can nlm Jead to pzuducUve public hear- inp when they are required tn determine the con- siotency af individual projects with a community's $oals and objec~ves. dire a pr~ect arid identif~ ismle, decide which e2dstin8 data will be used, chrffy airport operutur/ conmdtant relationsldps, and establi~ scheduJes, finan~ resources and ovemU project scope. d. Rsures 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3 depict the steps in the master plannin8 proceu, includin8 ora- tion end preplanru/n~. 2. THE HIERARCHY OF PLANNING. a. Airport plans at the national, state, region/ metropolitan area and individual, airport levels Eovernment are ~ormulated on the basis o~ transportation demands and coordinated with other tramportation planning .and compmhmai.vm land uN planninS. b. Airpoff planning in the United ,~ates is per- formed at several levels as follows: Systems, a 10-¥mr plan con~~y updm~ and published biennially by the FAA, lists the public use airports and their ~pment which are consid- ered to be in th~ national int~ and thtm eliSible [or 6named assistance htr aixport plannin8 and d~ velopmem under the ~ and Airway ment Act o/~982. (2) Statewide Zntq~ed Aiz~ 5ystem~ I'lannin8 tdentlfle~ the Seneml Ioc~on and chazae- terisfies of ~ ~rpafi8 and the ~,nemi e2man_,d,v, needs of existing a- irl~m to meet s'" --t~tewide--r--"'~]~ tmnsportatlon 8oab. This phnn~s is pe~cmmd by state tmmportation or aviation pla~ aSencies' (3) Regional/Metropolitan httesrated Air- port Systems Plannin8 identifies airport needs for la~e resiona~metmpolitan areas. Needs are stated ~ general tetras and incs:nlMruted into sht~,ide system plato. This planning is done .by rel~0nal/ met~opolilan planning ases~es. - (4) Airpofl Master r~m are. ptepa~,d b~ the a.~~ ot consultants. They d~taii the ~e i°nS-ran~e'pians of the individuaJ airport within the framework of statewide and resional/metm_ politan system plans. c. Airport master planninS must be respomive to areawide comprehensive transportation plan- nih8. This can be achieved by building 'into the mast~ plannin8 process appmpriat~ review, axa,. 3. MASTER PLANNING ELEMENTS, a. The elements o~ a maste~ p 'lasming pr~s will vary in comple~ty and destt~ o~ application, depending on the size, fxm~ and pz~lems of the individual airport. The technical steps de- scribed in ~ AC are genendly applicable. Each step should be undertaken only to the extent neces- .sary to produce a meanifl~ product for a speci~ ai~ort. It is not always necessary to undertake b. ~r example, a general aviation airport in a I~ns, might.only require the production o~ a set of plana and a brJe~ repoK giving the ~ for what t~ contained in the p/ans. Hxten~ inventory and bm:ksmund ir~ormation would not be necmmry. Porecasts and capacity data would probably be available from local, state OF federa] oSert~, and the ~ of the ptunnin8 proteins, with the posm- hie exception of the financial plan, is usually stmiShffo~. c. Study elements for rumples, busy airpom may involve sophistication beyond that detailed in this AC. Fq2r Mmple, off airport land use pbnnin8 stntesies and public participation proce~ may rt~luire highly innovative approaches. Environ- mental in~act assessments nmy require tedmJques not discussed he. re, and evai~ criteria for alter- natives analysis may be predicated on circum- stances not cove~ in this A~. d. TI~ rrmst~ plannJn8 study, as an activity, certain elements, depending on the airport. AS exampk, s: · Wher~ there is a question whether to rec- ommend pavement ~'omstmc-Uan or an overhy, a preliminary pewment evuJua- tion study, ineludin8 testir~ and corir~ nmy be necusary. The study should be limited ~ scope to ~at requ~ t~ make the determination. · Obstmctiun ev'dluntion, includm$ sur~ey work, nmy be an important safety issue. · Feasibility study of potential non-nero- nautical revenue producin8 property, in- cludin$ possible industrial park develop- ment, long term leases and land Feleases may be advantngeous. · The cost effectiveness of a specific de- velopment recommenchtion may have to may be a 'theoretienl need [or a runway / System D.vuk~mem extension, but the cost may, be. high. An- other example is whether a 150 ~t. wide runway should be extended at that width when only a 100 ft. wide.runway, 'is quired to meet current standards. e. Master plan eJemems in general are: (l) F,x~t/ng Cond/tgens ~nd Issues. A/ter the organization and preplanning phase, an irwentory ~ made of pertinent data. Data in collected on the aitpo~ and ai~pace infrastructure and abl~ort-re- lated land use~. ~ent airport-related issues and lnstitutionnl.m~isms a~e defined. (2) ~/en Demand £~. Aeronnutical demand, expressed in units necessary to determine tl~e required capacity of airport facilities, is ~t for short, intermedinte and long mn~e time While 20-year l~ri~s ~e usually targeted ~or hmg. range pro~tons, a ~ 0~yearintermediate pe~od is a more reaso~le target in terms o~ h)recsst accuracy. A ~.-year hn't. mst shoutd be o~ sttfficient accura~ to justify a short-term capital improvu~t prolp'am. ~t. TIw capability o~ the e~istin~ airport to support the forecmt demand.must be determined. Aizside capacity.requirements ate e~Fressed in numb~ and dimensions o~ nmways nnd a~oci- ated tnxiways, apron areas, etc. Landside capacity requirements incli~de terminal buildtn$ space, ~uto parking and surface access. Should it be deter- mined.that the ~ is capable of providing the required capacity, then the detailed plannin$ steps for the exis~8 site ensue, tf ~hete ~re serious reser- vations about the capacity of the existing site, there must be an investigation of alternatives such as developin8 new, rep~ment or nddilional sites, modi~'~ng the role of the exists airport or provid- ing.new general avintion facilities. (4) ,,tilt.Site Sek, ctttm. When the capability o~ the existinE airport to meet 6~.cast demand is questionable or when theze has been a decision to construct a new airport, a site selection process is necessary. In the former case, the emphasis is on the need for and feuibitity of a new airport. The review oJ potential new sit~ should, at least ird- tially, be limited tn scope to that which is necessary to make that kind of decision. In the latter case, the ' process wiU be sisniticantly more detailed, leadin8 to the selection of a spec~c site. (5) £nv~mnmentai Procedures and ~ m~,~. E.xistin8 and potential envin~unental impacts .and appropriate initiating measures must be consid- ~ throughout the mas~ planning p~. Att'- port development ln~oj~ must evenly meet. the requi~ments o~ NEPA in ord~ to receive Fed.emi financial support. Themast~planningptO. cans ss an ideal vehicle/or reviewin8 poten~ eh- (6) '$6na/atmn. A useful tool in dmenninin8 the mint e~cient airport contiSumion is the airport simulation model. Computer simulation may i~ warranted for a complex ai~e~t o~ when dev~ meat of ~reat magnitude is bemR considered. Sim- ulation allmvs the planner to analy~ the merits n~ a.lten~ve development !:~ .posal,q, patt~cui~ as they ~,Jatu Io time and fuel sav~6s. A' varie~ o~ simulation models have .been de~. !oped roi' aiqxm plnnning. A ~1 review is needed to determine wi~ch is best ~ot a particul~ aFplication, computer~ simu~on often in~nlves considerable expense ~r data collection and analysis and should only be underm, ken when benefits aM expected to exceed these expenses. (a) The .airport Layout Plan (ALI~ shows the airport botmdary, the landing area con~gum- fion and the a~ens tesen~d for iandnide faciUUe~. The location of nav~onaJ facilities and apl~tm~ and runway dear zone a~e~ ate also del~~ on. the ALP. (b) The Land Use Plan .shows a~eaa rec- ommended ~or the pas~enser terminal coznp~, mainte~n~ and ca~o fan, ties, general aviation fixed ba~ operator facilities, commensal and indus- trial azem, and other facilftfe~ witldn the ~ land uses should also be shown, based on consid- eraUons of noise levels, obsl~uction deazance crit~ tin, and any activities which may ~ the safety e~ a im-a/t opera0ons. ' (c) The 7i~rminal Area Plan displays the various ~ermLnal area components and their rela- tionships. Separate large scale drawings may be appropriate fnr impnrtam elements of the lermmaJ area plan, such as letminal building areas, cargo building areas, and hangar areas. id) Access plans Will show maj~rt h~ghwa¥ mutes Jrom the airport Io the Central Business Dis- tric~ and points of connection with key arterial sys- tems. They will also show other modes st acc'ess such az raft, it appropriate. The development access plans involves cooperation with 8ur/ace transportation agencies, partteularl), tot access mu. tings beyond ~he airport boundary. Spec/al studies o/' access s),stems beyond the airport boundary not normally included in a master plannifl8 project. · (8) P/an [mP/em~tatio~f. Tlds. step involves the preparation of development schedules and · coals. The schedu/es tar. dewJopment must be nanciallT' teasible. The master plan must show the sources of revenue which will cover capital provement Pro, ram costs as well as.operation and maintenance costs. Financial ;easibil/t), must be considered throU~hotlt the planning process, pec/aJly during the re~emen~ a ' .es- selection activi ,, c,.~__,__, _ nalysls and Sate t,. o,-flr, uufe8 are nornlally based on short (5 years), intermediate (10 years) and term (20 yeats) development needs. 4. MASTER PLANNING PRODUCTS. The prod. ucts st the master planning process w/Ii vary with the compfex/ty o~ the Project. The basic doeumems ate the master plan report and a se! of drawings. The master plan report should con ~ain the results of [hose investigations and analyses accomplished during the developmen! sir the plan 'ab~n an exp/analton if ~ ',,~ .... - .. 7~. ere should ao...aca are locates or.sized in unusual way or variances to FAA standards are required or have been 8ranted. nicai reports may Supplement Supporting tech- report, thc master plan A summary, document is useful es brin8 to§ether pertinent tm:Is, conclusions and recommendations [hr public consumption. This ~s an excellem p/ac~ for high/ightin8 the economic benefits which flow to the commurdty from tho airport. These may offset negative impacts such a.~ noise. For small 10Tojects, the ma~ter plan report and Summary report ma), be combined, espec~aliy i/' wide distribution is not anticipated. The ah-pon operator may also £md visual a/d~, includLng slides and models, usefu/in explaining the development plan. . During cnmplex master planmns, it may be nec. essary ~o produce interim, rePorts(or coordinati~ with FAA, state and users and for public tion as required b),. a public participation prosxam. ,$. PLAN CURRENCY. Ideally, the master should reflect an uP.to.date plan asacasment si what ~e~t~ a_n. cl what is required. For the larger a~pom, actrve anartasement and staE~, ~hia is feasible and also necessary tn view st the aclive, confrontational, relation~dtip sometimes the sin,oft and the communitT, it serves. Maiintenance of de- mand data allows a cont/nu/nl~ assessment st the credibil/ty st forecasts, enabling adjustment ~ de- velopment, schedu/es that are demand sensitive. The.dam from noise monitoring systems can be used in con~uncfion with a review o/ tiona/procedures to aircraR opera- - determine the auport land tc~e strategies, appropriate off- L/l:~at~8 airporl plans to reflect airport moditica- tion and o~t airport development is a necessity. In tact, airports receiving Federal tinanciaJ a~sistance are required to keep.their airport laYOut plan cur. rent. Aside from mamtainin8 the CurrencT of its airport layout plan, smaller continuing alrpo~ do not recl~e a adequate updating o1: the master pbin. Once an master plan has been produced, a revision shOuld only be n~ry to deal with unforeseen and substantive chan&es in activity or the emer- gence of tilt/cai issues. 6. PRODUCT APPROVAL. The a products st Ute maste- -,-- · pprnval of the · ' kuanmn roce aupott operator sh ..~-~ ~- .... 8 P ss by the cou . . rune~y so as to edi dersultant reunbursement and FAA paym~ urne. federa/Jy assisted planning Projects. FAA ap- proval ol [he master p/an extends orris, to aSsuring completion o/: Work elements Specified in the grant agreement. AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REG~ MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 2003 7:00 P.M... KENALCITY COUNCIL.CHAMBERS. http://www, ci.kcnai.ak.u S ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the kem will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General. Orders. ITEM B: SCIiIEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) PROCLAMATION: KCI~ HOCKEY. TEAM.-- III/4A NORTH STAR COh-FF.,i~~CE CHAMPIONS lo Presentation by Skl~ew Hl~ School National Ocean Sciences .Bowl. Team -- Stevie Kay-Phyfer, J_~ime Miller, Rachael Beatty, .Allison Simpson and Matt Smith. ITEM C: REPORTS OF ~ ASSEMBLY, LEGISLATORS AND CO UNCIL~, ITEM D: PUBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance No. 1991-2003 -- Increasing Estimated. Revenues and Appropriations by $779.25 in the General Fund for Drug Asset Forfeitures. Ordinance No. 1992-2003 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $24,876.90 in the General Fund for an Alaska Highway Safety Grant to Purchase Video Cameras. Resolution No. 2003-07-- Supporting Efforts to Secure a VISTA Volunteer to Develop a Strategic Economic Development Plan. Resolution 1~o. 2003-08 -- Supporting HB57, "An Act Amending the Manner of Determinin~ the Royalty Received by the State on Gas Production As It Relates to the Manufacture of Certain Value Added Products." o o ITEM E: lo 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ITEM F: . ITEM G: ITEM H: ITEM I: . 0 ITEM J: Resolution No. 2003-09 -- Requesting FY 04 Safe Commumties Fund/ng From the Department of Cornrnllnity alld Economic Development. Resolution No. 2003-10 -- Amending the City of Kenai, Alaska 2003- 2004 Capital Improvement Project {CIP) Priority List for Request of State Grants. *Liquor License Renewals -- Peninsula Moose Lodge # 1942 -- Club Oaken Keg # 1808 -- Package Store COMMISSION!COMMITTEE REPORTS Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Kenai Convention & Visitors Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report d. Kenai Chamber of Commerce *Regular Meeting of February 5, 2003. CORRESPONDENCE OLD BUSINESS NEW' BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1993-2003 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $1,782 in the General Fund Library Department for a State Grant. *Ordinance No. 1994-2003 -- Amending the Land Use Table in KMC 14.22.010 to Change Parks and Recreation in the RR, RR1, RS, RSl, RS2, RU Zones From a Secondary Use to a Conditional Use and, in the IL and IH Zones, From a Secondary Use to a Principal Permitted Use. REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITeM K: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. City Clerk ITEM L: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council EXECUTIVE SES~ON- None Scheduled ITEM M: ADJOURI~MENT AGENDA EF~AI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING MARCH 5, 2003 7:00 P.M. ~~R'AI CITY COU~'C~ http'//www, ci.kenai.ak.us COUNCIL/COUNCIL STAFF MEETING 6:00 P.M. ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) ITEM C: REPORTS OF KPB ASSEMBLY, LEGISLATORS AND COUNCIL~ ITEM D: Ordinance No. 1993-2003 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $1,782 in the General Fund Library Department for a State Grant. Ordinance No. 1994-2003 -- Amending the Land Use Table in KMC 14.22.010 to Change Parks and Recreation in the RR, RR1, RS, RS1, RS2, RU Zones From a Secondary Use to a Conditional Use and, in the IL and IH Zones, From a Secondary Use to a Principal Permitted Use. Resolution No. 2003-11 -- Directing the Continuation of the Project Entitled "McCoUum/Aliak Paving L.I.D.' and Designating What Improvements are to be Included in This Project. ITEM E: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS . 2. 3. 4. 5. Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission o Planning & Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commfssions and Commfttees a. Beautification Committee b. Kenai Convention & Visitors Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report d. Kenai Chamber of COmmerce ITEM F: lo *Regular Meeting of February 19, 2003. ITEM G: CORRF~PO~ENCE ITEM H: ,, OLD BUSINESS ITEM I: BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 o *Ordinance No. 1995-2003 -= Amending KMC 23.40.080 and 23.40.120 to Allow Employees to Elect the Opt-Out Provision of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as Stated in AS 39.35.150(b) and/or Opt Out of Municipal Medical and Hospital Insurance. Discussion -- Schedule Volunteer Appreciation Event REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITEM K: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. City Clerk ITEM L: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council EXECUTIVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM M: ADJOURNMENT Rebecca Cronkhite From: Sent: Subject: "Julia Rogers" <Julia. Rogers@aide.et. erg> Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:46 AM Airport Alert: Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program AAAE /A'C I-NA Legislative Department , Airport Alert http :_/Iwww. a irpo rtn e t. o r/g/jp_i n__fieg is To: AAAF_JACI-NA Chief Executives and Airport Operators on E-Mail Distribution From: Brad Van Dam - 703-797-2534 Re: Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program Date: February 27, 2003 As we have previously reported, the Fiscal Year 2003 (FY03) Omnibus Appropriations bill, which the President signed into law last week, includes $20 million for the Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program. With additional funding for the program finally in place, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may announce within 1 to 2 weeks that it is requesting proposals from communities and consortia of communities interested in participating in the program. Once DOT issues an order soliciting proposals, communities will likely have only 60 days to respond in order to receive priori~ consideration. This is same amount of time that communities had last year. If your community is interested in participating in the Small Communi~ Air Se~ice Development Pilot Program, you may want to begin preparing your proposal soon in expectation of the pending announcement. In an effort to help those of you who are interested in submitting a proposal, the following includes' 1) background information on the creation of the Small Community Air Sentic~ Development Pilot Program; 2) a link to the order that DOT issued last year, which describes what the agency expected communities to include in their proposals (the order that DOT issued last year will like be similar to the order that the agency issues this year); and 3) information on the communities that DOT selected last year to give you an idea about the types of proposals that were successful. 3/6103 We will contact you again as soon as we receive more information from DOT on when the agency plans to issue the order soliciting proposals for the Small Community Air Sentic~ Do¥elopment ~ilot ~rogram. Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program Congressional Action: The Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21), which Congross passed almost throe yearn ago, callod for the creation of the Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program. Congress created the program in an effort to improve air service to airports that suffer from infrequent service and high airfares. The bill authorized $27.5 million for the program in FY02 and FY03. Congress appropriated $20 million for the program as part of the FY02 DOT Appropriations bill and $20 million as part of the FY03 Omnibus Appropriations bill. The program is limited to no more than 40 communities, and no more than four communities or consortia of communities may be located in the same state. AIR-21 includes several other criteria for communities interested in participating in the program. For instance, only those communities with insufficient air service or u_nreasonably high airfares are eligible to participate in the program. ' .'- The law also limits the eligibility to communities with small hubs and smaller airports based on calendar year 1997 data. It also states that the airport presents "characteristics, such as geographic diversity or unique circumstances, that will demonstrate the need for, and the foasibility of, the program .... " Priorities: The law requires DOT to give priority consideration to communities or a consortia of communities where: 1) air fares are higher than the average air fares for all communities; 2) the community or consortium will provide a portion of the cost of the activity to be assisted under the program from local sources other than airport revenues; 3) the community or consortium has established, or will establish, a public-private partnership to facilitate air carrier se~ic~ to the public; and 4) assistance will provide material benefits to a broad segment of the traveling public, including business, educational institutions, and other enterprises, whose access to the national air transportation system is limited. Types of Assistance: According to the legislation, DOT may use funds in the Small Community Air Sentice Development Pilot Program to provide assistance to: 1) an air carder to subsidize service to and from an underserved airport for a period not to exceed three years; · 2) an underserved airport to obtain service to and from the underserved airport; and 3/6/O3 3) an underserved airport to implement such other measures as the Secretary, in consultation · ~tith such airport, considem appropdat~ to improve air se~ic~ both in t~rms of the cost of such ~,rvice to consumers and the availability of such service, including improving air service through marketing and promotion of air sentic~ and enhan~ utilization of airport facilities. A copy of the specific bill language included in AIR-21 may be viewed at: http. :/~.ai~ortn~t.or~/dept~/f~eml/leig ha/smallcommunity2.pdf. Last Year's Department of Transportation Order On February 14, 2002, DOT issued an order soliciting proposals from communities and consortia of communities interested in participating in the Small Commun~ Air Senti~ Development Pilot Program. As part of the order, DOT announced that it would be giving pdodty consideration to those communities that submittal their proposals within the next 60 days. The order included a list of items that DOT expected communities to include in their proposals. It also had speoific in~tru~ons on how to apply for funds in the Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program. A copy of the order that DOT issued last year may be viewed at: hffp. ://~~.a_ir~ortn~t.o~/dept~#edeml/lei~ha/small~ommunibt_.~df. Again, the order that DOT issued last year will likely be similar to the one the agency issues this year. It should provide int~mst~l communities with a bluepdnt - but by no means a final source - on what DOT will be expecting from communities when it issues the next order on the imall Commun~ Air Senti~ Development Pilot Program. Communities should care~lly review the next order that DOT issues for potential changes and new requirements. Communities That Received Funds Last Year Last year, DOT selected 40 communities from 38 states to participate in the program after Congress appropdatc~l the flint $20 million for the program. As we expe~ed, the demand for grants far exceeded the $20 million that Congress appropriated for the program in the FY02 DOT Appropdafions bill. DOT mc~ivt~l 179 proposals requesting mom than $142 million. According to press release issued by DOT, 'the grants range in size from $1,557,500 to Bismarck, ND, to develop rc~3ional senti~ linking North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana communities; to $85,010 to Abilene, TX, to hire a business development director to promote se~ic~s at the ai~ort." ^ number of communities rc~,~ived $500,000 or less. A copy of the press release and the list communities that received funds may be viewed at: http:/Mww.dotgov/affairs/dot06202.htm. Specific proposals that communities submitted may be Viewed at: OST-2002-11590. 316/03 ne/ Municipal Airport 2003 Monthly Enplanements* mSerie~t 5,602 Era 1998-2~2 Month 2003 2002 S yr. Average Jan 6,454 7,829 -1,375 , 8,055 ,,, Feb 5,602. 7,046 -1,444 7,302 . Mar 8~154 ,, Apr 7~032 May 7~702 j._~ 8,815 Jul 11 ~962 Aug 10~432 . S_ep 7~697 Oct 7~701 Nov 7,407 Dec 7,457 Totals 12.056 14,875 -2,819 nal Municipml Airport il M;onthly II Airport Marketing: Several meetings occurred during the last month with prospective tenants for airport property. Some of the plans and proposals are very exciting. A special thanks to Klm Howard, Assistant to the City Manager, for her willingness to drop everything and spend time with the many prospective clients we refer to her for specific airport land information. Airport Terminal Parking Lot and Driveway Reconfigurntion Project: Consultant continues work with the Airport Commission and Terminal user 'groups to develop a plan for presentation to Council. The most exciting part of this project will include upgrade of Terminal ramps and sidewalks to comply with Federal access requirements. This portion of the project is eligible for grant funding. Airport Terminal Display Project: Project is still on schedule for completion before tourist season. Airport Security: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) continues to provide two agents on a trial basis to search checked baggage outbound from Kenai to connecting carriers. Airport Manager met last month with Kenneth L. Jarmen, Federal Security Director, U.S. DOT, Transportation Security Administration and a bevy of Federal and contract personnel to access the capability of our terminal to accommodate full passenger and baggage screening. As most of you remember, the Kenai terminal original layout provided full passenger screening and therefore is well suited to any proposed changes in security requirements. The Airport Manager is continuing to meet with TSA representatives to draft an acceptable security plan for Kenai. Chief Kopp also met with Mr. Jarmen and is providing assistance in defining our capabilities and needs. More Airport Security: At the request of Mayor Williams, we have contacted Mr. Mike Machulsky, Assistant TSA Administrator, Alaska Region and invited him to visit Kenai to meet with our Airport Commission to discuss airport security. Mr. Malchulsky indicated that he would be interested in such a meeting and will discuss the possibilities with Ken Jarmen and perhaps coordinate something to coincide with Mr. Jarmen's next visit. Airport Certification Inspection: The FAA Airports Division conducted their annual airport certification inspection February 4th through the 7th. The final inspection report will be transmitted later this month. At the out-brief meeting, information provided indicated several areas of concern, primarily in the areas of manning and training. Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT): In conjunction with the certification inspection, the FAA RSAT team visited the Kenai Airport to conduct inspections of the airfield and possible incursion hazards. Recommendations from that inspection included improved signage and pavement markings. Central Peninsula Air Fair: Event is scheduled for May 31, 2003. Kenai will be hosting a fly-in breakfast and static displays. Anyone interested in volunteering should contact Kenai coordinator Mary Bondurant at 283-7951 x 22. Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database Rank LOCID 1 ATL 2 ORD 3 LAX 4 DFW 5 SFO 6 DEN 7 PHX 8 LAS 9 DTW 10 EWR 11 MSP 12 MIA 13 IAH 14 JFK 15 STL 16 MCO 17 SEA 18 BOS 19 LGA 20 PHL 21 CLT 22 CVG 23 HNL 24 PIT 25 BWI 26 IAD 27 SLC 28 TPA 29 SAN 30 FLL 31 DCA 32 MDW 33 PDX 34 CLE 35 SJC 36 MCI 37 MEM 38 OAK 39 RDU 40 SJU 41 MSY 42 BNA 43 HOU 44 SMF 45 SNA 46 IND 47 BDL 48 AUS 49 DAL 50 SAT 51 CMH 52 0NT 53 ABQ 54 MKE 55 OGG 56 PBI 57 RNO 58 PVD 59 JAX 60 RSW 61 ANC 62 BUR 63 BUF 64 SDF 65 OMA Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-1 REPORT VP PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLAN~MENTACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLARI~4ENTS Airport Name THE WILLIAM B HARTSFIELD AT CHICAGO O'HARE INTL LOS ANGELES INTL DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATI SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL DENVER INTL PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTL MC CARRAN INTL DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL INTL/WO MIAMI INTL GEORGE BUSH INTERCONTI~A JOHN F KENNEDY INTL LAMBERT-ST LOUIS INTL ORLANDO INTL SEATTLE-TACOMA INTL GENE~ EDWARD LAWRENCE LOG LA GUARDIA PHILADELPHIA INTL CHARLOTTE/DOUGLAS INTL CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCK HONOLULU INTL PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON INTL WASHINGTON DULLES INTERNATI SALT LAKE CITY INTL TAMPA INTL SAN DIEGO INTL-LINDBERGH FL FORT LAUDERDALE/HOLLYWOOD I RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NA CHICAGO MIDWAY PORTLAND INTL CLEVELAND-HOPKINS INTL SAN JOSE INTERNATIONAL KANSAS CITY INTL MEMPHIS INTL METROPOLITAN OAKLAND INTL RALEIGH-DURHAM INTL LUIS MUNOZ MARIN INTL NEW ORLEANS INTL/MOISANT FL NASHVILLE INTL WILLIAM P HOBBY SACRAMENTO INTERNATIONAL JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT-ORANGE C INDIANAPOLIS INTL BRADLEY INTL AUSTIN-BERGSTROM INTL DALLAS LOVE FIELD SAN ANTONIO INTL PORT COLUMBUS INTL ONTARIO INTL ALBUQUERQUE INTL SUNPORT GENERAL MITCHELL INTERNATIO KAHULUI PALM BEACH INTL RENO/TAHOE INTERNATIONAL THEODORE FRANCIS GREEN STAT JACKSONVILLE INTL SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INTL TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTL BURBANK-GLENDALE- PASADENA BUFFALO NIAGARA INTL LOUISVILLE INTL-STANDIFORD EPPLEY AIRFIELD Associated City ST Enplanements __ ATLANTA GA 39,277,901 CHICAGO IL 33,845,895 LOS ANGELES CA 32,167,896 DALLAS- FORT WORTH TX 28,274,512 SAN FRANCISCO CA 19,556,795 DENVER CO 18,382,940 PHOENIX AZ 18,094,251 LAS VEGAS NV 17,425,214 DETROIT MI 17,326,775 NEWARK NJ 17,212,226 MINNEAPOLIS MN 16,959,014 MIAMI FL 16,489,341 HOUSTON TX 16,358,035 NEW YORK NY 16,155,437 ST LOUIS MO 15,288,493 ORLANDO FL 14,831,648 SEATTLE WA 13,875,942 BOSTON Mt% 13 , 613,507 NEW YORK NY 12,697,208 PHILADELPHIA PA 12,294,051 CHARLOTTE NC 11,469,282 COVINGTON/CINCINNATI KY 11,223,966 HONOLULU HI 11,174,701 PITTSBURGH PA 9,871,995 BALTIMORE MD 9,675,681 CHANTILLY VA 9,643,275 SALT LAKE CITY UT 9,522,344 TAMPA FL 7,969,797 SAN DIEGO CA 7,898 , 360 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 7,817,173 ARLINGTON VA 7,517,811 CHICAGO IL 7,059,520 PORTLAND OR 6,754,514 CLEVELAND OH 6,269,516 SAN JOSE CA 6,170,384 KANSAS CITY MO 5,903,296 MEMPHIS TN 5,684,619 O~(LAITD CA 5,196,451 RALEIGH/DURHAM NC 5,191,077 SAN JUAN PR 5,135,591 NEW ORLEANS LA 4,936,271 NASHVILLE TN 4,479,909 HOUSTON TX 4,354,609 SACRAME1TI~D CA 3,979,043 SANTA ANA CA 3,914,051 INDIANAPOLIS IN 3,833,975 WINDSOR LOCKS CT 3,651,943 AUSTIN TX 3,648,600 DALLAS TX 3,596,052 SAN ANTONIO TX 3,528,955 COLUMBUS OH 3,441,286 ONTARIO CA 3,197,795 ALBUQUERQUE NM 3,148,780 MILWAUKEE WI 3,089 , 592 KAHULUI HI 2,999,863 WEST PALM BEACH FL 2,928,658 RENO NV 2 , 732 , 837 PROVIDENCE RI 2,684,204 JACKSONVILLE FL 2,616,211 FORT MYERS FL 2,574,322 ANCHORAGE AK 2,503,138 BURBANK CA 2,380 , 531 BUFFALO NY 2,140,002 LOUISVILLE KY 1,974,269 OMAHA NE 1 , 861,057 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-2 REPORT VP PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEMENT ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID 66 TUS 67 OKC 68 TUL 69 ELP 70 GUM 71 M~T 72 BHM 73 GEG 74 BOI 75 ORF 76 LIH 77 A. LB 78 GSO 79 KOA 80 RIC 81 LIT 82 ROC 83 COS 84 DAY 85 ISP 86 SYR 87 GRR 88 SAV 89 TYS 90 DSM 91 CHS 92 ITO 93 GSP 94 M~ 95 SRQ 96 JAN 97 MSN 98 PWM 99 PSP 100 MDT 101 CAE 102 ICT 103 GSN 104 LBB 105 HSV 106 GCN 107 PNS 108 STT 109 SFB 110 LEX 111 HPN 112 FAT 113 ABE 114 CID 115 GPT 116 TLH 117 MAF 118 HRL 119 BTV 120 AMA 121 CRP 122 SBN 123 ACY 124 BTR 125 VPS 126 JNU 127 SBA 128 CA/( 129 MOB 130 FAI Airport Name TUCSON INTL WILL ROGERS WORLD TULSA INTL EL PASO INTL GUAM INTERNATIONAL MANCHESTER BIRMINGHAM INTL SPOKANE INTL BOISE AIR TERMINAL/GOWEN FL NORFOLK INTL LIHUE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTERNATIONA KONA INTL AT KEAHOLE RICHMOND INTETtNATIONAL ADAMS FIELD GREATER ROCHESTER INTERNATI CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS MU JAMES M COX DAYTON INTL LONG ISLAND MAC ARTHUR SYRA~SE HANCOCK INTL GERALD R. FORD INTERNATIONA SAVANNAH INTERNATIONAL MC GHEE TYSON DES MOINES INTL CHARLESTON AFB / INTL HILO INTERNATIONAL GREEN ILLE- S PARTANBURG INTL MYRTLE BEACH INTL SARASOTA/BRADENTON INTL JACKSON INTERNATIONAL DANE COUNTY REGIONAL-TRUAX PORTLAND INTL JETPORT PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL HARRISBURG INTERNATIONAL COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN WICHITA MID-CONTINENT SAI PAN INTL LUBBOCK INTL HUNTSVILLE INTL-CARL T JONE GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK PENSACOLA REGIONAL CYRIL E KING ORLANDO SANFORD BLUE GRASS WESTCHESTER COUNTY FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATION LEHIGH VALLEY INTERNATIONAL THE EASTERN IOWA GULFPORT-BILOXI RGNL TALLAHASSEE REGIONAL MIDLAND INTERNATIONAL VALLEY INTL BURLINGTON INTL AMARILLO INTL CORPUS CHRISTI INTL SOUTH BEND REGIONAL ATLANTIC CITY INTERNATIONAL BATON ROUGE METROPOLITAN, R EGLIN AFB JUNEAU INTL SANTA BARBARA MUNI AKRON- CANTON REGIONAL MOBILE REGIONAL FAIRBANKS INTL Associated City ST __ TUCSON AZ OKLAHOMA CITY OK TULSA OK EL PASO TX AGANA GU MANCHESTER NH BIRMINGHAM AL SPOKANE WA BOISE ID NORFOLK VA LIHUE HI GREENSBORO NC KAILUA/KONA HI R I CHMOND VA LITTLE ROCK AR ROCHESTER NY COLORADO SPRINGS CO DAYTON OH ISLIP NY SYRACUSE NY GRAND RAPIDS MI SAVANNAH GA KNOXVILLE TN DES MOINES IA CHARLESTON SC HILO HI GREER SC MYRTLE BEACH SC SARASOTA/BRADENTON FL JACKSON MS MADISON WI PORTLAND ME PALM SPRINGS CA HARRISBURG PA COLUMBIA SC WI CHITA KS SAIPAN ISLAND CM LUBBOCK TX HUNTSVILLE AL GRAND CANYON AZ PENSACOLA FL CHARLOTTE AMALIE VI ORLANDO FL LEXINGTON KY WHITE PLAINS NY FRESNO CA ALLENTOWN PA CEDAR RAPIDS IA GULFPORT MS TALLAHASSEE FL MIDLAND TX HARLINGEN TX BURLINGTON VT AMARILLO TX CORPUS CHRISTI TX SOUTH BEND IN ATLANTIC CITY NJ BATON ROUGE LA VALPARAISO FL JUNEAU AK SANTA BARBARA CA AKRON OH MOBILE AL FAIRBANKS AK Enplanements -- 1,804,086 1,739,169 1,737,672 1,678,287 1,665,676 1,568,860 1,538,007 1,534,342 1,524,458 1,518,552 1,413,454 1,407,092 1,402,168 1,352,606 1,330,487 1,276,145 1,218,403 1,205,552 1,164,032 1,120,686 1,060,746 960,640 879,821 863,539 843,290 834,787 791,398 788,807 776,729 743,603 679,103 673,451 668,098 648,648 644,180 607,228 584,160 582,707 574,300 529,052 524,995 524,811 521,042 508,092 507,334 507,145 501,204 494,815 493,795 474,866 467,914 467,458 466,935 446,363 445,161 441,682 432,439 429,788 417,716 396,743 393,905 393,664 393,276 389,280 388,733 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : %rP-3 REPORT VP PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEMENTACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID Airport Name 131 MLI 132 EUG 133 ROA 134 SHY 135 FSD 136 GRB 137 XNA 138 PIE 139 SGF 140 FWA 141 BIL 142 FNT 143 LGB 144 LAN 145 MFE 146 CHA 147 ACK 148 EYW 149 MBS 150 AVL 151 CRW 152 TOL 153 SWF 154 BGR 155 DAB 156 LNK 157 MLB 158 AZO 159 ATW 160 ILM 161 EW 162 MFR 163 BZN 164 M~M 165 FAR 166 BMI 167 MRY 168 MSO 169 PHF 170 TRI 171 AVP 172 STX 173 ASE 174 PSC 175 AGS 176 HYA 177 RAP 178 TVC 179 PIA 180 EGE 181 LFT 182 JAC 183 PFN 184 CHO 185 FCA 186 ERI 187 RDM 188 SBP 189 RST 190 FAY 191 VGT 192 BFL 193 GNV 194 GTF 195 DLH Associated City ST __ MOLINE IL EUGENE OR ROANOKE VA SHREVEPORT LA SIOUX FALLS SD GREEN BAY WI FAYETTEVILLE/SPRINGD AR ST PETERSBURG-CLEARW FL SPRINGFIELD MO FORT WAYNE IN BILLINGS MT FLINT MI LONG BEACH CA LANSING MI MC ALLEN TX NANTUCKET MA KEY WEST FL SAGINAW MI ASHEVILLE NC CHARLESTON WV TOLEDO OH NEWBURGH NY BANGOR ME DAYTONA 'BEACH FL LINCOLN NE MELBOURNE FL KALAMAZOO MI APPLETON WI WILMINGTON NC EVANSVILLE IN MEDFORD OR BOZEMAN MT MONTGOMERY AL FARGO ND BLOOMINGTON/NORMAL IL MONTEREY CA MISSOULA MT NEWPORT NEWS VA BRISTOL/JOHNSON/KING TN WILKES-BARRE/SCRANTO PA CHRISTIANSTED VI ASPEN CO PASCO WA AUGUSTA GA HYANNIS MA RAPID CITY SD TRAVERSE CITY MI PEORIA IL EAGLE CO LAFAYETTE LA JACKSON WY PANAMA CITY FL CHARLOTTESVILLE VA KALISPELL MT ERIE PA REDMOND OR SAN LUIS OBISPO CA ROCHESTER MN FAYETTEVILLE NC LAS VEGAS NV BAKERSFIELD CA GAINESVILLE FL GREAT FALLS MT DULIrrH MN QUAD CITY INTL MAHLON SWEET FIELD ROANOKE REGIONAL/WOODRUM FI SHREVEPORT REGIONAL JOE FOSS FIELD AUSTIN STRAUBEL INTERNATION NORTHWEST ARKANSAS RGNL ST PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER IN SPRINGFIELD-BRANSON REGIONA FORT WAYNE INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS LOGAN INTL BISHOP INTERNATIONAL LONG BEACH /DAUGHERTY FIELD CAPITAL CITY MC ALLEN MILLER INTL LOVELL FIELD NANTUCKET MEMORIAL KEY WEST INTL MBS INTERNATIONAL ASHEVILLE REGIONAL YEAGER TOLEDO EXPRESS STEWART INT' L BANGOR INTL DAYTONA BEACH INTL LINCOLN MUNI MELBOURNE INTL KALAMAZOO/BATTLE CREEK INTE OUTAGAMIE COUNTY REGIONAL WILMINGTON INTL EVANSVILLE REGIONAL ROGUE VALLEY INTERNATIONAL GALLATIN FIELD MONTGOMERY RGNL (DANNELLY F HECTOR INTL CENTRAL IL REGLARPT AT BLO MONTEREY PENINSULA MISSOULA INTERNATIONAL NEWPORT NEWS/WILLIAMSBURG I TRI-CITIES REGIONAL TN/VA WILKES-BARRE/SCRANTON INTL HENRY E ROHLSEN ASPEN-PITKIN CO/SARDY FIELD TRI-CITIES AUGUSTA RGNLAT BUSH FIELD BARNSTABLEMUNI-BOARDMAN/PO RAPID CITY REGIONAL CHERRY CAPITAL GREATER PEORIA REGIONAL EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL LAFAYETTE REGIONAL JACKSON HOLE PANAMA CITY-BAY CO INTL CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE GLACIER PARK INTL ERIE INTL ROBERTS FIELD SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY-MC C ROCHESTER INTERNATIONAL FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL/GRANN NORTH LAS VEGAS MEADOWS FIELD GAINESVILLE REGIONAL GREAT FALLS INTL DULUTH INTL Enplanements 381,330 374,174 364,202 361,436 357,787 357,660 357,378 352,899 352,008 351,623 346,375 338,994 335,225 332,669 317,818 300,746 296,451 292,508 282,548 277,189 276,095 275,210 274,126 272,833 264,438 262,919 262,004 260,788 260,474 255,782 253,243 242,645 240,583 239,806 237,234 236,343 235,430 230,065 227,635 225,293 218,906 215,225 215,091 210,681 208,444 205,906 197,525 197,060 194,398 184,562 180,563 173,692 169,369 165,938 158,004 155,618 153,541 150,732 150,516 149,244 149,150 148,200 144,078 143,632 141,405 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database REPORT VP Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-4 PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEM~,~T ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID Airport Name Associated City ST __ 196 BIS BISMARCK MUNI BISMARCK ND 197 GJT WALKER FIELD GRAND JUNCTION CO 198 BET BETHEL BETHEL AK 199 CWA CENTRAL WISCONSIN MOSINEE WI 200 BGM BINGHAMTON REGIONAL/EDWIN A BINGHAMTON NY 201 CMI UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-WILL CHAMPAIGN/URBANA IL 202 UNV UNIVERSITY PARK STATE COLLEGE PA 203 DET DETROIT CITY DETROIT MI 204 IDA FANNING FIELD IDAHO FALLS ID 205 AEX ALEXANDRIA INTL ALEXANDRIA LA 206 EKO ELKO REGIONAL ELKO NV 207 MLU MONROE REGIONAL MONROE LA 208 HDN YAMPA VALLEY HAYDEN CO 209 MKK MOLOKAI KAUNAKAKAI HI 210 ELM ELMIRA/CORNING REGIONAL ELMIRA/CORNING NY 211 BLI BELLINGHAM INTL BELLINGHAM WA 212 KTN KETCHIKAN INTL KETCHIKAN AK 213 LSE LA CROSSE MUNI LA CROSSE WI 214 ACV ARCATA ARCATA/EUREKA CA 215 ENA KENAI MUNI KENAI AK 216 ITH TOMPKINS COUNTY ITHACA NY 217 ILE KILLEEN MUNI KILLEEN TX 218 FSM FORT SMITH REGIONAL FORT SMITH AR 219 HXD HILTON HEAD HILTON HEAD ISLAND SC 220 DRO DURANGO-LA PLATA COUNTY DURANGO ' CO 221 CLL EASTERWOOD FIELD COLLEGE STATION TX 222 GFK GRAND FORKS INTL GRAND FORKS ND 223 BPT SOUTH~T TEXAS REGIONAL BEAUMONT/PORT ARTHUR TX 224 CSG COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN COLUMBUS GA 225 LRD LAREDO INTL LAREDO TX 226 YKM YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL/MCALLIS YAKIMA WA 227 SUX SIOUX GATEWAY SIOUX CITY IA 228 EWN CRAVEN COUNTY REGIONAL NEW BERN NC 229 LYH LYNCHBURG REGIONAL/PRESTON LYNCHBURG VA 230 BED LAURENCE G HANSCOM FLD BEDFORD MA 231 CRQ MC CLELLAN- PALOMAR CARLSBAD CA 232 SMX SANTA MARIA PUB/CAPT G ALLA SANTA MARIA CA 233 TTN TREN~I~DN MERCER TRENTON NJ 234 HLN HELENA REGIONAL HELENA MT 235 LNY LANAI LANAI CITY HI 236 MOT MINOT INTL MINOT ND 237 RDD REDDING MUNI REDDING CA 238 SUN FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL HAILEY ID 239 TYR TYLER POUNDS FIELD TYLER TX 240 MVY MARTHAS VINEYARD VINEYARD HAVEN MA 241 SPI CAPITAL SPRINGFIELD IL 242 SBY SALISBURY-OCEAN CITY WICOMI SALISBURY MD 243 LWS LEWISTON-NEZ PERCE COUNTY LEWISTON ID 244 DHN DOTHAN RGNL DOTH;tN AL 245 BRO BROWNSVILLE/SOUTH PADRE ISL BROWNSVILLE TX 246 SIT SITKA ROCKY GUTIERREZ SITKA AK 247 MTJ MONTROSE REGIONAL MONTROSE CO 248 CPR NATRONA COUNTY INTL CASPER WY 249 LCH LAKE CHARLES REGIONAL LAKE CHARLES LA 250 ADQ KODIAK KODIAK AK 251 YUM YUMA MCAS/YIIMA INTL YUMA AZ 252 ACT WACO REGIONAL WACO TX 253 PPG PAGO PAGO INTL PAGO PAGO AQ 254 LAW LAWTON-FORT SILL REGIONAL LAWTON OK 255 DBQ DUBUQUE REGIONAL DUBUQUE IA 256 ABI ABILENE REGIONAL ABILENE TX 257 OTZ RALPH WIEN MEMORIAL KOTZEBUE AK 258 HTS TRI-STATE/MILTON J. FERGUSO HUNTINGTON WV 259 OME NOME NOME AK 260 GUC GUNNISON COUNTY GUNNISON CO Enplanemen=s 136,611 132,930 129,567 129,062 128,827 127,845 125,658 125,171 125,023 122,744 117,872 115,159 114,760 114,269 112,866 112,515 112,210 111,238 111,163 100,965 99,861 99,815 99,493 92,465 91,276 90,736 90,465 89,809 87,450 87,086 86,451 85,684 85,639 82,459 82,204 80,630 77,738 77,466 76,675 75,018 74,242 73,441 73,072 71,715 71,150 71,065 70,964 69,595 69,220 68,760 68,002 67,242 66,918 66,165 65,905 63,987 63,365 60,726 60,448 58,531 58,447 58,112 57,277 55,145 55,131 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-5 REPORT VP PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEM~NT ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID 261 APF 262 SPS 263 ALO 264 FMN 265 ORH 266 PIH 267 FLO 268 EAT 269 BTM 270 SJT 271 AKN 272 MKG 273 IFP 274 DLG 275 SAW 276 GTR 277 PGV 278 SAF 279 SGU 280 IPT 281 RDG 282 ABY 283 EFD 284 OXR 285 BRW 286 TXK 287 OAJ 288 TWN 289 TNI 290 RHI 291 PSM 292 STS 293 GRO 294 COU 295 TWF 296 BQN 297 JLN 298 C~ 299 VLD 300 PUW 301 CIC 302 VQS 303 LMT 304 ALW 305 FLG 306 PLN 307 YNG 308 CMX 309 DUT 310 PAH 311 MEI 312 COD 313 MAZ 314 OTH 315 HOM 316 LBE 317 BJI 318 MCN 319 CLM 320 RFD 321 MOD 322 HGR 323 PQI 324 ABR 325 GYY Airport Name Associated City NAPLES MUNI SHEPPARD AFB/WICHITA FALLS WATERLOO MUNI FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL WORCESTER REGIONAL POCATELLO REGIONAL FLORENCE REGIONAL PANGBORN MEMORIAL BERT MOONEY SAN ANGELO REGIONAL/MATHIS KING SALMON MUSKEGON COUNTY LAUGHLIN/BULLHEAD INTERNATI DILLINGHAM SAWYER IN~NATIONAL GOLDEN TRIANGLE REGIONAL PITT-GREENVILLE SANTA FE MUNI ST GEORGE MUNI WILLIAMSPORT RGNL READING REGIONAL/CARL A SPA SOUTHWEST GEORGIA REGIONAL ELLINGTON FIELD OXNARD WILEY POST-WILL ROGERS MEM TEXARKANA REGIONAL- WEBB F I E ALBERT J ELLIS WEST TINIAN RHINELANDER-ONEIDA COUNTY PEASE INTERNATIONAL TRADEPO SONOMA COUNTY ROTA INTL COLUMBIA REGIONAL NAPLES WICHITA FALLS WATERLOO FARMINGTON WORCESTER POCATELLO FLORENCE WEHATCHEE BUTTE SAN ANGELO KING SALMON MUSKEGON BULLHEAD CITY DILLINGHAM COLUMBUS/W POINT/STA GREENVILLE SANTA FE ST GEORGE WILLIAMSPORT READING HOUSTON OXNARD BARROW ' TEXARKANA JACKSONVILLE TINIAN ISLAND RHINELANDER PORTSMOUTH SANTA ROSA ROTA ISLAND COLUMBIA JOSLIN FIELD - MAGIC VALLEY TWIN FALLS RAFAEL HERNANDEZ JOPLIN REGIONAL GREGG COUNTY VALDOSTA RGNL PULLMAN/MOSCOW REGIONAL CHICO MUNI ANTONIO RIVERA RODRIGUEZ KLAMATH FALLS INTERNATIONAL WALLA WALLA REGIONAL FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM PELLSTON REGIONAL AIRPORT 0 YOUNGSTOWN-WARREN REGIONAL HOUGHTON COUNTY MEMORIAL BARKLEY REGIONAL KEY FIELD YELLOWSTONE REGIONAL EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS NORTH BEND MUNI HOMER ARNOLD PALMER REGIONAL BEMIDJI-BELTRAMI COUNTY MIDDLE GEORGIA REGIONAL WILLIAM R FAIRCHILD INTL GREATER ROCKFORD MODESTO CITY-CO-HARRY SHAM HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL-RICHARD NORTHERN MAINE REGIONAL ARP ABERDEEN REGIONAL SA~Y/CH~CA~O AGUADILLA JOPLIN LONGVIEW VALDOSTA PULLMAN/MOSCOW, ID CHICO ISLA DE VIEQUES KLAMATH FALLS WALLA WALLA FLAGSTAFF PELLSTON YOUNGSTOWN/WARREN PADUCAH MERIDIAN CODY MAYAGUEZ NORTH BEND HOMER LATROBE BEMIDJI MACON PORT ANGELES ROCKFORD MODESTO HAGERSTOWN PRESQUE ISLE ABERDEEN GARY ST FL TX IA NM MA ID SC WA MT TX AK MI AZ AK MI MS NC NM UT PA PA GA TX CA AK AR NC CT WI MO ID PR MO GA WA PR OR WA MI OH MI MS PR OR PA GA WA IL SD IN Enplanement s 54,791 54,694 54,580 53,300 52,916 51,896 50,384 49,404 47,949 47,554 47,261 45,666 45,444 45,398 45,294 45,263 44,856 43,687 42,733 41,574 41,112 39,481 39,292 38,894 38,880 38,794 38,279 38,159 38,127 37,937 37,786 37,627 36,716 36,573 36,543 35,722 34,223 34,051 33,243 33,221 32,418 32,089 31,629 31,620 31,603 31,571 31,475 31,263 31,109 30,883 30,785 29,942 29,407 28,961 28,737 28,662 28,537 27,799 26,739 26,524 26,404 25,923 25,174 24,603 24,588 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database REPORT VP Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-6 PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEMENT ACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID 326 STC 327 INL 328 SGY 329 EWB 330 VDZ 331 IPL 332 PKB 333 CYS 334 EAU 335 SHD 336 BQK 337 JST 338 CDV 339 BRD 340 LAF 341 ESC 342 MGW 343 PIR 344 LHD 345 PSG 346 1G4 347 PGA 348 VCT 349 JHW 350 SLN 351 SOP 352 RKD 353 ANI 354 TEX 355 SCC 356 ROW 357 BRL 358 TUP 359 GCC 360 DEC 361 SHR 362 HKY 363 X95 364 CKB 365 PVC 366 AOO 367 FHR 368 CIU 369 MHK 370 DUJ 371 YAK 372 CVX 373 CEC 374 BLV 375 LEB 376 GST 377 BHB 378 PIB 379 LNS 380 PDT 381 RIW 382 HIB 383 WRG 384 KDK 385 GLH 386 VIS 387 BFD 388 LAR 389 LWB 390 MCW Airport Name Associated City ST CLOUD REGIONAL FALLS INTL SKAGWAY NEW BEDFORD REGIONAL VALDEZ IMPERIAL COUNTY WOOD COUNTY AIRPORT GILL RO CHIPPEWA VALLEY REGIONAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY REGIONAL GLYNCO JETPORT JOHNSTOWN- CAMBRIA COUNTY MERLE K (MUDHOLE) SMITH BRAINERD-CROW WING CO REGIO PURDUE UNIVERSITY DELTA COUNTY MORGANTOWN MUNI-WALTER L. B PIERRE REGIONAL LAKE HOOD PETERSBURG JAMES A JOHNSON GRAND CANYON WEST PAGE MUNI VICTORIA REGIONAL ST CLOUD INTERNATIONAL FALLS SKAGWAY NEW BEDFORD VALDEZ IMPERIAL PARKERSBURG EAU CLAIRE STAUNTON/WAYNESB/HAR BRUNSWICK JOHNSTOWN CORDOVA BRAINERD LAFAYETTE ESCANABA MORGANTOWN PIERRE ANCHORAGE PETERSBURG PEACH SPRINGS PAGE VICTORIA CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY/JAMESTOWN JAMESTOWN SALINA MUNI MOORE COUNTY KNOX COUNTY REGIONAL ANIAK TELLURIDE REGIONAL DEADHORSE ROSWELL INDUSTRIAL AIR CENT BURLINGTON REGIONAL TUPELO RGNL GILLETTE-CAMPBELL COUNTY DECATUR SHERIDAN COUNTY HICKORY REGIONAL DIEGO JIMENEZ TORRES BENEDUM PROVINCETOWN MUNI ALTOONA-BLAIR COUNTY FRIDAY HARBOR CHIPPEWA COUNTY INTL MANHATTAN RGNL DU BOIS-JEFFERSON COUNTY YAKUTAT CHARLEVOIX MUNI JACK MC NAMARA FIELD SCOTT AFB/MIDAMERICA LEBANON MUNi GUSTAVUS HANCOCK COUNTY-BAR HARBOR HATTIESBURG- LAUREL REGIONAL LANCASTER EASTERN OREGON REGIONAL AT RIVERTON REGIONAL CHISHOLM-HIBBING WRANGELL KODIAK MUNI MID DELTA RGNL VISALIA MUNI BRADFORD REGIONAL LARAMIE REGIONAL GREENBRIER VALLEY MASON CITY MUNI SALINA PINEHURST/SOUTHERN P ROCKLAND ANIAK TELLURIDE DEADHORSE ROSWELL BURLINGTON TUPELO GILLETTE DECATUR SHERIDAN HICKORY FAJARDO CLARKSBURG PROVINCETOWN ALTOONA FRIDAY HARBOR SAULT STE MARIE DU BOIS YAKUTAT CHARLEVOIX CRESC~ CITY BELLEVILLE LEBANON GUSTAVUS BAR HARBOR HATTIESBURG/LAUREL LANCASTER PENDLETON RIVERTON HIBBING WRANGELL KODIAK GREENVILLE VISALIA BRADFORD LARAMIE LEWISBURG MASON CITY ST MN MN AK MA AK CA WV WY WI VA GA PA AK MN IN MI WV SD AK AK AZ AZ TX NY KS NC ME AK CO AK IA MS IL NC PR PA WA MI PA MI IL MS PA OR MS PA IA Enplanements 23,240 23,211 23,002 22,882 22,780 22,774 22,017 21,720 21,493 21,113 20,980 20,820 20,354 20,175 20,128 19,342 19,328 19,221 19,127 18,998 18,898 18,768 18,679 18,298 18,212 17,751 17,328 17,194 17,107 16,941 16,706 16,511 16,433 16,419 16,240 16,082 16,010 15,798 15,771 15,694 15,678 15,585 15,566 15,490 15,439 15,358 15,357 15,248 15,245 15,156 14,776 14,399 14,120 13,977 13,785 13,495 13,081 13,059 12,969 12,856 12,816 12,785 12,780 12,717 12,612 Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY2000 ACAIS Database Report Date : 10/19/2001 Page : VP-7 REPORT VP PRIMARY AIRPORT ENPLANEMENTACTIVITY SUMMARY FOR CY2000 LISTED BY RANK ORDER, ENPLANEMENTS Rank LOCID Airport Name Associated City 391 APN ALPENA COUNTY REGIONAL ALPENA 392 BFF WESTERN NEB . RGNL/WILLIAM B SCOTTSBLUFF 393 IYK INYOKERN 394 17Z MANOKOTAK 395 GRI CENTRAL NEBRASKA REGIONAL 396 GON GROTON-NEW LONDON 397 FOD FORT DODGE REGIONAL 398 SDY SIDNEY-RICHLAND MUNI 399 3W2 PUT IN BAY 400 GCK GARDEN CITY REGIONAL INYOKERN MANOKOTAK GRAND ISLAND GROTON NEW LONDON FORT DODGE SIDNEY PUT IN BAY GARDEN CITY 401 MWA WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGIONAL MARION 402 HNS HAINES HAINES 403 MW}{ GRANT COUNTY INTL MOSES LAKE 404 RKS ROCK SPRINGS-SWEETWATER COU ROCK SPRINGS 405 PCW CARL R KELLER FIELD PORT CLINTON 406 BFI BOEING FIELD/KING COUNTY IN SEATTLE 407 AHN ATHENS/BEN EPPS ATHENS 408 FYU FORT YUKON FORT YUKON 409 HNH HOONAH HOONAH 410 EAR KEARNEY MUNI KEARNEY 411 CDC CEDAR CITY REGIONAL CEDAR CITY 412 GPZ GRAND RAPIDS/IT~~ CO-GORD GRAND RAPIDS 413 BID BLOCK ISLAND STATE BLOCK ISLAND 414 74 S ANACORTES ANACORTES 415 UIN QUINCY REGIONAL-BALDWIN FIE QUINCY 416 WST WESTERLY STATE WESTERLY 417 OWB OWENSBORO- DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO 418 MTM METLAKATLA METLAKATLA 419 MTH THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON MARATHON U.S. TOTAL (419 PRIMARY AIRPORTS) : ST Enplanements __ MI 12,609 NE 12,566 CA 12,564 AK 12,522 NE 12,362 CT 12,111 IA 11,729 MT 11,507 OH 11,504 KS 11,402 IL 10,992 AK 10,655 WA 10,634 WY 10,628 OH 10,586 WA 10,582 GA 10,551 AK 10,498 AK 10,483 NE 10,463 UT 10,439 MN 10,393 RI 10,313 WA 10,232 IL 10,173 RI 10,152 KY 10,034 AK 10,027 FL 10,011 708,638,875