HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-11-18 Harbor Commission SummaryKENAI HARBOR CO~IMISSION
P. O. Box 580
Kenai, Alaska 99611
AGENDA - November 18, 1980
REGULAR HARBOR CO~LMISSION MEETING-
November 18, 1980- 7-00 p.m.
Kenai Public Safety Building
HARBOR COM~MISSION MEMBERS',
Robert Peterkin, Chairman
John Williams, Vice Chairman
Tom Ackerly
W. M.- Burnett
Ron Isaacs
Marvin Dragseth
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
Betty Glick, Councilwoman
Mayor Vindent O'Reilly
AGENDA
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
Ce
Agenda Approval
De
Approval of Minutes
1. October 28, 1980
2. November 4, 1980
E. Introduction of Guests
1. Rick Baldwin
F. Communications
G. Reports
1. Gary Davis
2, Chairman Peterkin
a ~
Roper Situation
3. Mayor O'Reilly
a ·
ttarbor Commission Vacancy
H. Old Business
1. Administrative Coordinator.Contract
Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission
Regular Meeting, November 18, 1980
Kenai Public Safety Building
Robert Peterkin, Chairman
S ·
C ·
·
There was a Work Session prior to the
'quorum at 7:00 p. m.
meeting as
the re was not a
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Peterkin called the meeting
to order at
8:25 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Robert
Commissioner Isaacs, and
Peterkin, Vice-Chairman
Commissioner Acke rly.
John Williams,
Others Present: Mayor O'Reilly,
Brighton, and Gary Davis.
Councilman Wagone r,
Wm. J.
AGENDA APPROVAL
The agenda was approved.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. October 28, 1980 - approved.
2. November 4, 1980 - approved.
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
None
COMMUNICATIONS
Councilman Wagoner pointed out Councilwoman Glick
the ex-officio member, Councilman Wagoner is.
is no longer
.REPORTS
1. Mr. Davis
in reference
reported on the letter from Kramer,
to the unsigned comment sheet that he
Ch in and Mayo
prepared for
them. Kramer, Chin and Mayo are doing Phase II of the Borough's
Coastal Management Program. The reason he sent these comment
sheets in, is to point out and get some feedback on the City's
concerns as to the bluff problems and the possible environmental
groups that may be seeking to expand the Tidelands area on the
proposed harbor site. There may be additional monies that can be
utilized to work on some of these problems. It was not the
intent that they weren't signed. He believed their response is
quite positive. The City will decide what restrictions, studies
or developments that might be pursued in these areas.
On the Kenai Wetlands Working Group of November 7, Mr. Davis
reported it was the second meeting to review the MOA required of
the agencies. There were concerns from the Council after Mr.
Davis's report of the first meeting. Mr. Davis mentioned these
concerns at the second meeting of the KWWG. One concern was if
the City needed a resolution to identify a representative. It
doesn't need a resolution, just someone identified to report back
to the Council on the meetings. The National Marine Fisheries
Group has not signed the MOA.
Mr. Davis reported Phil Waring attended the meeting. It was his
first appearance and he came away quite pessimistic and would
include that in his report to the new Mayor.
John Tolley is the Regional Transportation Planner for DOT. One
area they discussed is how the City going to approach the State
in requesting money for harbor construction. Mr. Tolley compiles
projects in this district. Mr. Davis said it is an avenue for
the Commission to request $20,000,000 to be presented to the
Governor's Administration. One advantage is, the State would
handle the construction of the project. They will provide the
requests for bids, oversee the construction, etc. Mr. Davis
indicated to Mr. Tolley it was his impression at this time, that
the City was going to go through the Municipal Grant process. If
we want to go that route, Mr. Tolley would like to know as soon
as possible. Mr. Davis indicated he is getting a letter prepared
for him to approve, referring to the items discussed at their
meeting, saying everything Mr. Tolley saw was in line with the
Act. He would like to have Mr. Tolley approve that in writing.
Mr. Davis reported he has been working extensively on the
feasibility study and compiling the different approaches to the
study.
Commissioner Williams spoke in regards to DOT. We talked to Don
Statter on going through DOT in the beginning and at that time we
felt we wanted to go through it on our own. One advantage of
going through the State is if for some reason this works out not
to be a financial asset, but rather a liability, the State
absorbs the losses rather than the City. The problem is, we must
operate totally under the DOT's regulations and follow their
criteria for the harbor completely. Commissioner Williams spoke
about contacting Mr. Tolley and asking him to put us on the list
for $20,000,000 and also do our lobbying, and see what comes
first.
Mr. Davis stated if you lobby for municipal grants or for a
Public Works project, there are a few statues that require a
local match. It could go under the same statute as our 74 Bond
monies which required 10% local match. The new DOT's regulations
don't require any match.
There was further discussion.
Commissioner Williams asked Mr. Davis if he thought there would
be a problem with telling Mr. Tolley to go ahead and then
lobbying on our own.
Mr. Davis said he hadn't investigated it.
Councilman Wagoner stated the problem would be confusion in
Juneau.
Mayor O'Reilly asked if that money were in the DOT's hands is it
less likely to be counted against the money allocated in the
Senate?
Commissioner Williams stated that is a fact.
Councilman Wagoner spoke about once the money is in DOT's hands
they have full control when it isn't a bonded amount that the
people vote on.
Mr. Brighton thought a specific bill for a specific purpose.
There was discussion. That is not necessarily the case.
Commissioner Williams stated he would like to request Mr. Davis
to contact John Tolley and ask his felling about it.
Chairman Peterkin asked Mr. Davis to do so, and possibly contact
Mur r ay Wal sh.
Mr. Davis reported Mr. Tolley informed him of a multi-model
transportation study going on in our area. Primarily it will
deal with roads, railroads and highways. He hadn't seen the
study. Woodward/Clyde is the consultant for the study. They
will be here and Mr. Davis will contact them. He stated if we
are going to have some large projects they should be informed so
they can fit it into their overall plan.
2. a. Chairman Peterkin reported all Commissioners, with
the execption of Commissioner Ackerly, attended a Work Session
with Mr. Roper's attorney. Chairman Peterkin made a
recommendation to the City Manager to see if we can have a Work
Session with the City Council on November 24.
Commissioner Williams noted there was a letter from Mr. Roper's
attorney in the packet, possibly there should be a recommendation
to the City Council that no action be taken on this.
Chairman Peterkin didn't feel it was necessary.
3. a. Mayor O'Reilly reported the Harbor Commission vacancy
will be resolved at the Council meting the following night.
Mayor O'Reilly reported the City Council did concur with the
recommendation that the Commission sent to them regarding harbor
powers outside the City.
Mayor O'Reilly reported on the meeting held the previous Monday
between several members of the Council and members of the
Assembly. Two members of Assembly attended. The Assembly
members were informed of the memorandum regarding harbor powers.
The reaction from the two Assembly persons was they saw no
problems with it. There was divided reaction whether they should
play a more active part in trying to have some municipal harbor
powers laid before DOW, Exxon or anyone else looking at potential
sites. One Assembly person said something had to be done, the
other said he saw no mandate from the people saying it had to be
do ne o
Mayor O'Reilly reported there would be a meeting the following
evening at the Borough regarding having a port service area.
Mayor O'Reilly referred back to the Assembly and Council meeting
held the previous Monday. Other points of discussion included
that we want to make sure the Assembly persons support for the
funding on CZM money. One felt there was no chance of having a
Federal and State agency arrive at a MOA.
The Council's reaction was that it was worth the effort.
Chairman Peterkin asked what Assembly persons were present?
Mayor O'Reilly reported Jesse Wade and Tom Harvey. He added the
meeting was not to persuade, just find initial views.
Mr. Davis asked how did they feel about Coastal Management
continuation of the Borough's program?
Mayor O'Reilly said it was divided. Tom Harvey indicated there
must be a minimal type of zoning. Mayor O'Reilly felt the tone
of what the Borough will do regarding planning, CZM, harbor
development, etc. will be set by the Borough Mayor.
Mr. Brighton thought this kind of dialog needs to continue.
Mayor O'Reilly said even if just for the record.
Commissioner Williams asked if we have any type of ~a~$~on between
the Borough and the City Council?
Mayor O'Reilly stated they meant to bring that up.
H. 1. Mr. Davis reported on the Administrative Coordinator
Contract. His understanding was the City/Borough contract
apparently has been signed today and should be available to
handed out to the City Council tomorrow evening.
Mr. Brighton reported he would pick up the Contract in the
morning so it will be available for Council.
Councilman Wagoner asked what period of time the Contract
covered?
Mr. Davis replied through June 30.
Chairman Peterkin asked when do we make application for next
year?
Mr. Brighton stated now.
Chairman Peterkin said January 1 we should make request for
extension for Mr. Davis's contract.
Mr. Brighton thought that would be a good idea.
Commissioner Ackerly wondered about the prohibition of lobbying
clause in the Contract.
Mr. Brighton said Mr. Davis would have to be cautious. He cannot
use this money for lobbying.
There was further discussion of the Contract. Mr. Davis said the
reason the $64,000 figure was left in instead of prorating the
exact amount from when it was signed, was so it would not cause
any confusion and slow up the process. There is a "not to
exceed" figure and there will be invoices submitted monthly. Mr.
Davis also stated he is to provide a secretary that will provide
the minutes.
Chairman Peterkin asked about an office in the new City Hall.
Mr. Brighton stated there was no space available.
There was discussion on an office location.
Mr. Davis stated when he moved, he would recommend
Ex-Commissioner Burnett get a letter of thanks for the use of his
office and very comfortable and good working conditions.
H. 2. Commissioner Dragseth is in Anchorage.
I. Commissioner Williams stated he would like to begin some
publicity for the harbor. He suggested 3 x 5 cards advertising
the fact we are promoting a harbor. Something to the effect that
"Kenai has 600 boats." "Kenai has 9 active processing plants."
"Kenai does not have a boat harbor." Possibly even have the cost
on the bottom.
Chairman Peterkin thought it was illegal for a Commission to use
advertising.
Commissioner Ackerly suggested it could be printed on the back of
the business cards. He added Commissioner Dragseth asked him to
design the cards.
Councilman Wagoner· suggested the Commission start some
advertising in the Anchorage paper saying for a $25.00 deposit,
we will reserve a stall for you in the small boat harbor. If the
harbor isn't built the deposit will be reimbursed. It is
something to show the Anchorage legislators and can be taken to
Juneau. He added he had a list of gillnetters in uook Inlet and
their addresses.
Chairman Peterkin added he has a list of 802 names from the
Borough computer of boat owners.
Councilman Wagoner said he is President of United Cook Inlet
Drifter's and they show an interest in the boat harbor.
Mr. Brighton said it would be good to see public interest outside
of the Commission.
Commissioner Isaacs suggested the Isaac Walton League may show an
interest.
Councilman Wagoner spoke about the public hearing held earlier
this year when the Corps of Engineers were here and the support
shown the re.
Mr. Brighton stated the interest should be revived.
Mr. Brighton asked Mr. Davis to check with the City Attorney on
the legality of the PR cards and the advertising in the
newspapers, and what type of escrow fund would be necessary to
handle the mo ney.
Commissioner AckerlY asked if the name of an elected official
should be on the business cards?
There was some discussion and it was decided it would not be
.necessary.
There was some discussion on the Salamatof Seafoods situation.
Chairman Peterkin reported the next meetings would be December 2,
and December 16.
J. With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
? \
APPR .....
~hai r~an
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Howard
Administrative Assistant