Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-12-11 Harbor Commission PacketKENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 11, 2000 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/k ROLL CALL ITEM 2' AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- October 9, 2000. ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HE_A~D ITEM 5' OLD BUSINESS ao ITEM 6: Discussion-- Bluff Erosion/Coastal Trail Update SEW S SlSESS ITEM 7: REPORTS ao Director Dock Foreman City Council Liaison Scrapbook Information ITEM 8: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/OUESTION.~ ITEM 9' INFORMATION a, Kenai City Council Action Agendas of November 1 and 15, 2000. Commission Membership Update ITEM 10- ADJOURNMENT KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2000 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1- CALL TO ORDER/k ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3- APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- September 11, 2000 ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEA~r~ ITEM 5' OLD BUSINESS ao Discussion -- Snug Harbor Ramp Excavation ITEM 6: NEW BUSINESS ao ITEM 7: Discussion -- Boating Facility Financial Report REPORTS Director Dock Foreman City Council Liaison Scrapbook Information ITEM 8: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/OU~-STION~ ITEM 9- IRFORMATION Kenai City Council Action Agendas of September 6 and 20, 2000. Updated Harbor Commission Membership List. ITEM 10' ADJOURNMENT I~NAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2000 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/h ROLL CALL Vice-Chair Tom Thompson called the meeting to order at 7'00 p.m. follows: Roll was called as Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present' Rogers, Peters, Price, Spracher, Thompson, O'Reilly Eldridge, dahrig _ Public Works Manager Komelis, Contract Secretary Roper ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION: Commissioner Spracher MOVED to approve the agenda and Commissioner Peters SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- September 11, 2000 MOTION: Commissioner O'Reilly MOVED to approve the minutes of September 11, 2000 and Commissioner Price SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None. ITEM 5' OLD BUSINESS Discussion-- Snug Harbor Ramp Excavation No discussion was held as it was determined that permits would not be required for the project from either the Corps of Engineers or the State of Alaska. As a result, no commission action was required. ITEM 6- NEW BUSINF~S 6-a. Discussion -- Boating Facility Financial Report Komelis gave a brief overview of the financial report in the packet and pointed out it did not include salaries, benefits, depreciation or transfers. It was also noted that fuel sales were down due to the price increase and slow fishing season. Thompson asked if the City considered placing a fuel pump at the head of the dock to accommodate personal fishers. Komelis answered, the City would probably never recoup the cost of installation and there was also the potential of environmental issues with fuel spills, etc. Rogers asked if consideration was given to the ramp situation and the congestion during dip net season. A lengthy discussion ensued and it was noted that more coordination and patience from the users was.required. O'Reilly asked about advertisement of services provided by the City. Komelis replied that the advertisement funds expended were for the signage at the dock during dip net season. O'Reilly suggested that more advertisement of services be accomplished. ITEM 7: REPORTS Director-- Komelis reported the dock was completely shut down for the winter; the power was shut off; floats were up; and there was no fuel available. Dock Foreman -- Komelis reported Swede Freden would be attending the Harbor Master conference in Kodiak this week. City Council Liaison -- No report. 7-do Scrapbook Information - Peters explained the scrapbook to new members and encouraged everyone to continue to provide articles and photographs for it. She noted she would have the scrapbook available at the next meeting. ITEM 8: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS!QUF~TIONS~ Commissioner Peters asked if there was any new information on the coastal trail. Komelis explained the City was looking to the CARA fund as the main source of financial support but it had been drastically changed and reduced. The issue would be raised aga/n next year. ITEM 9' INFORMATION 9-8. Kenai City Council Action Agendas of September 6 and 20, 2000. Updated Harbor Commission Membership List. ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT The next meeting will be held on November 6, 2000. HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 6, 2000 PAGE 2 MOTION: Commissioner Peters MOVED for adjournment. There were no objections. ORDERED. SO The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara L. Roper, Contract Secretary HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 6, 2000 PAGE 3 ratrovich, Nottingham & Drage? In, 1506 West 36th Avenue · Anchorage, Alaska 99503 · 907-561-1011 · Fax 907-563-4220 September 28, 2000 Mayor John Williams City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200 Kenai, AK 99611-7794 Dear Mayor Williams- PN&D 99072 We are pleased to present this cost Drol2osat to continue [o the permitting phase of the Coastal Trail Project. During the various presentations and reviews of the initial reconnaissance phase, very few negative comments were received. The one concern that nee(is additional assessment is the seclimentation issue. A more detailecl study of coastal littoral drift and Kenai River sedimentation contribution to inlet beach formation anct stabilization is in order. This can be done preceding the permit process and a budget for this work has been included. A dver survey establishing thalweg elevation wilt also be recluired. The permit process should start by initial contact with vanous key agencies and officials on an individual basis to assess any of their concerns. This has proven to be a good way to start the process and often surfaces issues not initially obvious. Next would be a permitting pre-a.Dptication meeting w~th the State Coordinating Agency, DGC, which is also in charge of Coastal Zone Consistency reviews. At that time, new informaUon including the sedimentation study could be discusse~l and the project outlined and discussed including concerns previously uncovered. ' The need for an environmental assessment other than that provided by the Corps of Engineers review should also be established. This determination witl influence the size of the permitting budget and time requirect to complete the permitting process. To emphasize the importance of aqency influence on project cost, recent manne project permitting costs have run from $6,0~0 to over $1,000,000 for projects of size similar to the Coastal Trail Project. Because the engineering study to date has been in great detail, the permit application will be done quickly, including drawings and various completed forms. The draft permit should be presented at the initial DGC meeting. During the permit review period, some questions will arise which will require written response and possibly some meetings. To accomplish all the work required during the permit [~rocess. the following budget was , established for the ideal case. Asterisks marl( areas that could expand subject to agency demands. PERMITTING PHASE TASKS AND BUDGET Task 1. Agency and Official Contacts $20,000 PN&D would meet inclividually with permitting agency reviewers anct officials to present the Coastal Trail Project ariel assess their concerns with it. The tist of parties with interes~ in the Coastal Trail Project is lengthy, ancl any of these parties could have concems that would require aclditional ~roiect stuclies and delay the project. These meetings would also provide an opportunity to present positive features of the project. A proposed list of contacts follows. Regulatory Agencies U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch U.S. EPA, Kenai Office U.S. Fish anti Wildlife Service National Marine Fishenes Service, Kenai River Representative AK Dept. of Natural Resources, Southcentral Lanct Division AK Dept. of Fish ana Game, Habitat and Restoration Division AK Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Div. of Water Quality AK Office of Management & Budget, DGC, $outhcentral Branch Political Offices City of Kenai, Mayor ana City Council Kenai Peninsula Borough, Mayor & Council City of Soldotna, Mayor anct City Council U.S. Senator Ted Stevens · State Senator Jerry Wara (Kenai) State Senator John Torgerson (Soldotna) State Representative Harold Smalley (Kenai) State Representative Gary Davis (Soldotna) Governor Tony Knowtes Environmental Organizations Kenai Watersl3ed Forum Cook Inlet Keeper Native Organizations Salamatoff Traclitionai Counc~i Salamatoff Native Corporation Kenai indian Tribe Parks US Forest Service-Chugacn National Forest Alaska State Parks - Kenai River Special Management Area AK Dept. of Nat. Resources, Div. of Parks & Outdoor Recreation City of Kenai, Parks ancl Recreation Other Interested Parties Kenai River Property Owner's Association Kenai Peninsula Cladon Anchorage Daily News Others To Be Identified Task 2. Kenai Dunes Impact Assessment $15,000 The Kenai Dunes are a natural sancl beach along the nortt~ side of the Kenai River outlet at Cook Inlet. Dunng preliminary review of the pro¢osed Kenai Coastal Trail proiect, agency reviewers suggested that the trail might threaten the Kenai Dunes by eliminating the Kenai River bluff erosion as a material source for rel~tenisnment of the beacl~. This concern can be addressea early in the permitting process by conaucting a stucly of the sancl "buaget" for the beacl~. This stucly will draw on previous wor~ pedorme0 as ~art of a 1984 small boat t~amor study by TAMS, ot~er studies of tong-sl3ore transt3ort in Cook Inlet, and new investigations, 'based on review of aenat photos and calculations. PN&D, working with coastal engineer Dr. Orson Smith, P.E. of the University of Alaska would prepare a bdef but detailed report to document the results of the study. The UAA study, to be directed by Dr. Smith, would be funded througt3 a small grant to the University. Our preliminary examination of the matter is that the coastal trail will have almost no affect on the Kenai Dunes. Task 3. River Survey $12,000 An aerial survey performed in 1996 obtained uplands survey data required for the project permitting and design. Concerns regarding river scour and Kenai Dunes beach nourishment, however, will require additional river and near shore bathymetry surveys around the mouth of the Kenai River. Task 4. Pre-Application Meeting $2,000 After individual contacts have been made with agency'-reviewers, PN&D witl prepare presentation matenats for and initiate a permitting agency "pre-application meeting" througt3 the Division of Governmental Coorctination (DGC'~. A draft of the permit application would be presented for comment. Task 5. Prepare and Submit Permit Applications $3,000 The formal permitting process for the proiect is initiated by submittal of (1) a Corns of Engineers permit application (for discharge of fill into wetlands, and also for structures in · navigable waterways), (2) an Alaska Coastal Management Proqram Coastal Project Questionnaire to the Alaska Department of Governmental Coor0inatior~ and. (3) a fish habitat permit application to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. PN&D will prepare permit al:}plications and submit them on behalf of the City of Kenai. Task 6. Permitting Coordination PN&D will provide permitting coordination to address information and follow througt~ on the permitting process. $10,000' agency requests for additional Task 7. Additional Studies (If Required) (Cost Undefined)* Once the permit applications lqave been submitted, the agency reviewers will provide official comments that must be addressed before project permits can be issued. The scot~e of these comments will determine what additional studies will be required for the project, and the associated costs. Costs noted with an asterisks will depend on agency requirements. The total initial permitting budget will be $62,000. Since this type of work is highly variable, we suggest proceeding on a time-and-materials cost basis with a not-to-exceed budget of $62,000 unless authorized otherwise in writing. For your reference, we have attached letters from the Alaska Del~artment of Fish and Game and from the U.S. EPA outlining some concerns. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, P~TROVICH,_NOTTINGHAM & DRAGE, INC. _ Denn's ottingnam, P.E. t /"'~ President ~/ DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME HABITAT AND RES?ORA T/ON DIVISION TONY KNOWLES. GOVEh...,,R ~ RA~PBER~ ANCHORAGE: 99518-1599 Keith Komelis .City Engineer 210 Fidalgo Ave., Suite 200 Kenai, ^K. 99611-7794 Dear Mr. Kometis: ....... ' Janua~ 31, 2000 .DATE:. //....q',/',/'o,r,'"t PROJECT: 1 III CC; ,' Re: Kenai Coastal Trail and Erosion Control Project Design Concept Report Review The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Habitat ancl Restoration Division, has r~iewc~i the recently released' Kenai Coastal Trail an~l Erosion Control Proj~t Design Concept Report prepared for the City of Kenai by their contractor, Peratovich, Nottingham and Drage, lnc (PN&D). Th~nK you for providing us with a copy of this document anti the notification of the January 11, 2000 puDtic meeting regarding this issue. The Alaska Department of Fish ana Game (ADF&G) provided vert3ai comments at that public m~fing in the form of questions and issues that ncmd to be addressed by the City and/or it's consultant pursuant to a proposed Kenai River bluff staDilization and I~:test.dma trail. The concerns voiced centerlmi on the potential for this project to oause a~verse effects tb fisheries resources which utilize the mouth anti lower reaches (tidally iMluenced areas) of the Kenai River. In addition, we am.~pncem~i about ~p. tent!g_l iai.acts to the unnamed anadromous fish stream (No Name Cree~, Anadm_mou__s. Stream No. 244-30-10010-2001) which include the potential for this project to..alter ~ll~ess availability for fish at the confluence of this stream and the Kenai River and the E0tential for changes in the existing sand dunes that provide erosion protection for the ._~.. tlands through which this stream mean~iers. The Department has also stated concerns regarding the proposed project's potential to o~use hydraulic changes in the Kenai River that could change the natural b~l Ioaa transport conditions and deposition rates in the lower river. We are concerned that ~anges to the ex~sting hydraulic conaitions, no matter how large or small, mag result in the potential for alteration of the bank conditions above or below the mouth of the Kenai River. Such changes could necessitate further bank erosion protection and increas~i co,ts attributable to this proiect. These changes could affl~-~t the ex~sting sewage treatment plant site and sewer outfall conditions. W-e question if 'this' pfoje~ ~il'hiter the' currant erosion and deposition rates of long shorn currents in Coot~ Inlet near the mouth of the Kenai River. Please note that the ADF&G raises these concerns t~-ause we have alrea~j invested over $100,000.00 in access and dune proteotion with the City in this ama which could'be adversely affected by alteration of Kenai River flow resulting from this proposed proi~mt. We are concerned that the proposea design of the armored deflection dike located at the upstream end of No-Name Creel( may create a current gym. This could result in increased erosive forces attacking the bank further up the beach dune area towards the c=,xisting beac~ accsss road and dip-net fishing tum:-around area. Nso, the construction of a large rock facect jetty on both sides of the mouth of No-Name Creel( could re~3uce shoreline fisherman access to the existing aiD-net fishery during certain tide levets or in total. The ADF&G unclerstancls that the City's consultant, PN&D, have only estimated the potential thalweg elevation. This elevation must be thoroughly analyze(:l anti d~ument~ to avoid the potential for catastrophic failure of the proiect. The de~t~ of scour, estimated to be -5 feet for this project, is also questionable and warrants more d~tailed analgsis to establish a scour deCth at which this project should be design~ml to protect against. The use of bioengineering to stabilize eroding slopes is an acceptable slope protection method. However, the species of plants to be used for slope stability must be carefully considerecl basecl upon the type of soils, the erosion forces ant wort< and the availability of the seca or plug' plant materials source. We recommen~i the City of Kenai coordinate this concept with staff at the Plant Materials Center in Palmer wino have trained staff that can assist in evaluating the feasability of the use of these techniques and materials at this location. Additio~al analysis of the biological resources using the project, area is also needed to ensure the biological productivity of the estuarine habitat is not adversely affected by the proposed project through physical and chemical alteration of the existing habitat. In order to address the secondary and cumulative effects that this proposed project may produce, an environmental impact or assessment document will need to be prepared for the project. The ADF&G unclerstancis the City of Kenai's need to address the significant level of ~rosion occurdng along the north side of the mouth of the Kenai River and appmoiates the City's multiple use perspective for bank stabilization as outlined in this preliminary ~esign Concept Re~orff. We look forward to working v~th the Ci~ in its o~orts to develop a mutually satisfactory approach to the existing erosion conclition at this location. Please keep in mina however, that resolution of one problem can result in significant impacts to o~er resources ariel potentially generate o~er unforeseen impacts that result in the n~essitg for excansion of the initial proi~t. It is for these masons II, at ~e above concems anct questions are provided to you for consideration in ~e m~alysis ol the proposed proi~t. Please contact me at the Kenai River Center at (907) 260-4882 if you have any questions r~jar~ting our agencies review comments or questions. Sincerely, Uepitz Habitat Biologist Kenai River Center D. McKay, ADF&G/H&R NL Bethe, ADF&G/SF S. Fisler, ADNR/DPOR J. Mohorcich, KPB/KRC J. Gabter, KBP/FP V. Davis, USFWS R. Davis, ADF&G/CF P. North, USEPA D. Voss, NMFS D. Sheridan, DGC Keith Kometis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: pnor~.v~ Hi Keith, We have a coastal engineer on our wetlanas staff in An~orage who t consutt~ al3out ~e Dluff erosion control/coastal trail I~miect. Hea~er Dean is my countemart in Anchorage aha has aegrees in coas~t engineenng. I talkea with her aDout the sane movement auestions to see if she agme~ with the conclusions mac, ecl by ~e PN&D engineers. She Oeninte~ out that wl~ile the 40 miles of erocling Oluff to the souttt of the al River mout~ no aout3t conmt3utes large amounts of sane to heaves in this ama. them ara many forces acting on the sane. So while the ~enerat trena of sane movement aDpears to 13e to the non~. muctt of it is hkely to De aisl3erse=l on ~e way to ~e mou~ of the Kenai. Also acang on this sana is the Kenai River rtself, which may act as a hamer to further movement or at least it will divert sane away from the t)eactt for a while. A portion of the 40 miles worttt of sane is likely t3eing contnbute=l to the sane dunes at the mou~ of the nver, at least on ~e soum side, but how muctt mtative to that con~butec113y the bluff at the River moutl~ is a 13ig question. PhilliD North [pnor~i~ptialasKa.netl Friday, January 28, 2000 9:32 AM Keith Komelis Gary Liemtz: Jeanne Hanson: Vicki Davis: Glencla Lanclua: Heather Dean: Rick Ross Kenai Bluff Erosion Control/Coastal Trail Project In contrast the al,un .es.are_~imcUy adjacent to the 1 mile of erin:ling bluff at the mourn o~ me Klver. ~ancl is being wastte~t dimctty to ama. No doubt some of fils sancl is also wa~e~l out into ~e Inlet and depencting on the tides ancl winds at any given time, some sand will move sm~ an=l some north. The bottom tine is that them is still a gmat deal of uncertainty. The dunes am an important element of the estuanne an=l tidal wetlanets system at the moutl~ of the River. They provide a 13rotective 13amer between the waves generate=l in Cook Inlet anti the tidal wettancts along No Name Creek (Richta Creel<), as welt the estuanne t~aDitat in ~e tidal reactms of No Name Creel<. ariel the tidal wetlancts on the sout~ side of the Kenai River mouth. These wetlancts are a very nch hal3itaL climct~ arm indirectly, for birds, fish, marine mammals anct offer animals. The Kenai sewage tma~ent plant an=l houses along the currently non erc,:ling part of the bluff (like your house) am also 13romct~ by the clune system. The ~lunes also provide habitat for song t3ird$ anti other animals. And since dunes are rare along ~ts coast fie hat3itat provided is all the more important. So, for ecm~i-cat anti diremty financial reasons, it is important to make sum we unclerstancl the consequences of eliminating the eroding 10luff as a source of sane for the clune system at tl~ mouttt of the River. Slnce we am still In a pre funding and 13m permit application stage 1 would recommen=l finding someone with spemfic exl3erlJsa in coastal processes to consult on ~ese questions fully ancl base=l on good data. We nee~ the opinion of someone who unclerstancls the processes in action here. It would also t~elp if this person clid not have a stake in the outcome. These questions will have to be actdmssect some time. If there is federal money that goes into this 13reject then NEPA will come into play. An ElS may De re(luire~ by the funcling agency, then certainly these ~luestions will have to 13e answere=l. They will also nee~l to be a=lclmssea in the Corn of Engineers 13ermit 13rocess. It seems I~etter to continue on the l~ructent 13a~ the City has taken an=l get answers 13efor going into the permit phase, wt~em we am all boun=113y clea~llines. In Attachment C that environment unanswereo Ques'Oc, permrt cleniat. .~A to teaa to recommenaatJons for '^gain I want to emq~t~asis ~at I unelerstancl the neeet for ~is 13rojecC 1 do not ol3posa mis 13roiect =er se. 8ut there seem to be consequences to this l=roiect mat may Oe severe. ~so again, 1 want to tl~anl< the City for tatting ~e aq~proacfl you nave. It is mucfl easier to ;liscuss all these issues outside of the offi~ review 0rocess. We have the time for real clialogue. If we .can. answer mese questions saUsfactonty the permitting phase ought ~o 13e ven/straigrtt forwarcl, with no controversy. ThanKs again, Phil Norl~ MEMORANDUM CITY OF KENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE. SUITE 2130 KENAL ALASKA 99Sll-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-2834014 ~ TO: FROM' DATE: SUBJECT' Rick Ross, City Manager -.~ Keith Komelis, Public Works Manager(,~--)p October 10, 2000 Kenai Coastal Trail PND - Permitting Phase I have reviewecl Peratovich, Nottingham, & Drage, Inc.'s, PND's, proposal datea SeptemDer 28, 2000 along with the att~c~ed letters addmsseO to me from ADF&G an0 US-EPA. I believe that the work outlinect in this proposal is the next logical step for this project. It would be an extremely important toot to o~tain funding for the project. It would be a goocl idea to actdress some of the concerns that were mentionecl at the public hearings on this project. Concerns such as: · Effects to fishery resources acljacent, above, ancl below this proiect. Impacts the project may have to the anadromous fish stream that crosses this project. Hydraulic changes to the Kenai River and river channet. Consequences of eliminating the sand from the eroding bluff as a source of river sand: How will the sand bars and channels change? Will them be changes to the dune system west of the project? Will this effect the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant and the sewer outfatl? Attachment D Memo to Rick Ross Page 2 October 10, 2000 If all regulatory agencies, political offices, environmental organizations, native organizations, parks ariel others are involveO an{i their pro~tems and concerns am acldressed, many of the funcling "roaabloct(s" can be diverted. I was happy to see that Tasks 1-4 garnered the majority of time and effort before pmpadng and sul~m~ing the permit applications. This gives evergone a chance to contribute before the permits are submitted and formal rel31ies and time deaellines are set. A combined effort on the odginat I~erm~t submitteel might help make this "everyone's project." Thus each agency or groul3 will know how the pmiect will solve some of their concerns and thus suCport the permits. KK/jet Attact~ments i CITY OF XEENAI 210 FIDALGO AVE.. SUITE 200 KENAI. ALASKA 99611-779e TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 ~92 M cmo ranClum Date: To: From: October 12, 2000 Mavor and Council Richard A. Ross, C i.ty Manager Kenai Coasr~al Trail- Environmental Permitting Attached is a proposal submitted by Perau'ovich. Nomngham and Drage, inc. ~o address agcmcy concerns on the coastal trail project This proposal also includes preparation of nmessary permitm arid mauagemem of the permi~g process. Mi'. Kometis has submiued a review of the proposal that validates the need for the work proposed. Mr. La Shot has reviewed the issues of costs and has advised that the proposed charges are generally in line with expecmdons based on recem environmental work projects within th~ City. Council is aware that this last season we were adviseci by the senatorial staff of the Depamnent of the Interior Committee that a necessary, component of our request tbr funds was to have the U.S. Corps of Engineers in support of it. Unless we do the work proposed and have the environmental agencies on bOard, or at least have addressed their concem~, we will not get this support. If we can ge[ this work done in a timely manner, we will again approach Senator Stevens' office for the consu'ucdon engineenng funds necessary, to ge~ this proje¢~ designed with more accurate cost estimates. At your last meeting you appropriated funds to relocate sewer lines on Mission Street. The need for this project is well justified to stop the erosion that will commue to be costly to both the public and private sector. As a coastal trail it will also enhance the tourist economy as well as recreational facilities available to our own citizens. The Administration is requesting Council's authorization to negotiate a contract to implement the proposal of Peratrovich. Nottin~am and Drage, Inc., which will be brought back to Council for appropriation and award action. Attaehmem Attachment I= Suggested by: Administration CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 2000-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~NAI, ALASKA, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES TO PERATROVICH, NOTTINGHAM & DRAGE, INC. FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERMITTING PHASE OF THE PROJECT ENTITLED THE KENAI COASTAL TRAIL FOR THE LUMP SUM AMOUNT OF $62,000. WHEREAS, a proposal dated September 28, 2000, was received from Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage, Inc. for this project; and, WHEREAS, awarding a contract to Peratrovich, Nottingham & Dra§e, Inc. is in the best interest of the City; and, WHEREAS, the recommendation from the City Administration is to award the contract to Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage, Inc. for the environmental and permitting phase of the project entitled the Kenai Coastal Trail for the lump sum amount of $62,000. WHEREAS, sufficient momes were appropriated with Ordinance No. 1888-2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the contract for the environmental and permitting phase of the project entitled the Kenai Coastal Trail be awarded to Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage, InC. for the lump sum amount of $62,000. PASSED November 2000. ATTEST: Carol L. Freas, ~City Clerk~ Approved by Finance: BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 15th day of AGENDA KENAI CIIT COUNCIL- ~OI,.Ut ME~'TING NOVEMBER 1, 2000 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www.ci.kenm.~.us ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval o 4. Consent Agenda o *Ail items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCIt]EDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) ITEM C: PUBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance No. 1882-2000 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $457,256 in the ARFF/SRE Capital Project Fund. Ordinance No. 1883-2000 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $297,000 in the Wellhouse No. 4 Capital Project Fund. Ordinance No. 1884-2000 -- Am__ending KMC 14.20.321 Requiring Inspection of Buildings Prior to Issuance of a Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use Permit and Requiring Biannual Inspections Thereafter. Ordinance No. 1885-2000 -- Amending KMC 14.20.320 to Require (1) Home Occupation Day Care Facilities to be Inspected for Compliance w/th the Fire Code Prior to Issuance of a Permit and Thereafter Biannually; and (2) Other Home Occupations to be Inspected for Fire Code Compliance Prior to Issuance of a Permit ff Deemed Necessary by the Fire Marshal. Ordinance No. 1886-2000 -- Amending K1VIC 14.25 to Provide for Administrative Approval of Landscaping/Site Plans. Resolution No. 2000-64 -- Transferring $1,300 in the Fire Department for a software upgrade. ITEM D' 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ITEM E: . ITEM F: ITEM G: ITEM H: . 0 . o ITEM I: , 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Kenai Historic Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Kena/Visitors & Convention Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report MINUTES *Regular Meeting of October 19, 2000. Work Session Notes of October 17, 2000 CORRF~PO~ENCE OLD BUSnTESS NEW BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1887-2000 -- Eliminating the Kenai Historic Commission by Repealing Ordinance No. 1866-2000. *Ordinance No. 1888-2000 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $70,000 in the General Fund and the Kenai Coastal Trail Capital Project Fund. Discussion - Well House No. 4 ADMINISTRATION REPORTS Mayor City Manager Attorney City Clerk Finance Director Public Works Managers Airport Manager ITEM J: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council F.,IG~CU?IVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM K: ADJOURNMENT AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 2000 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www, ci.kenai.ak.us ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS ( 10 minutes) ITEM C: PUBLIC HF_ARINGS . Ordinance No. 1887-2000 -- Eliminating the Kenai Historic Commission by Repealing Ordinance No. 1866-2000. . , Ordinance No. 1888-2000 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $70,000 in the General Fund and the Kena/Coastal Trail Capital Project Fund. Resolution No. 2000-65 -- Awarding a $47,800 Contract to Seekins Ford Peninsula for Two Patrol Vehicles. Resolution No. 2000-66 -- Awarding a Contract for Professional Consulting services to Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage, Inc. for the Environmental and Permitting Phase of the Project Entitled the Kenai Coastal Trail for the Lump Sum Amount of $62,000. Resolution No. 2000-67 -- Transferring $5,000 in the Street Improvements Capital Project Fund for Engineering. ITEM D' COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS , 2. 3. 4. Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission . 6. 7. 8. Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Kenai Historic Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report ITEM E: MH~TES . *Regular Meeting of November 1, 2000. ITEM F: CORRESPONDENCE ITEM G: OLD BUSINESS ITEM H: . ITEM I: NEW BUSIngS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1889-2000 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $2,300 in the Senior Citizen Title III Grant Fund for a Grant From the State of Alaska. Discussion-- Replacement of Rear Screen Projector/Kenai Visitors & CulturaJ Center. Discussion -- Draft City of Kenai Newsletter ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City Manager 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Managers 7. Airport Manager ITEM J: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council F2/ECUTIVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM K: ADJOIrRNMENT HARBOR COMMISSION Meets Monday Following First Council Meeting of the Month- 7'00 p.m. Council Chambers Commission Member Name and Home Business I~mail Address Term Address Phone Phone Ends Barry Eldridge 283-7152 lridgebb(~_,ptialaska.net 2001 2679 Bowpicker Lane Kenai, AK 99611 Chuck Rogers 283-0816 floydr(~_,alaska.net 2001 1117 Larch Street Kenai, AK 99611 Katie Peters 283-9106 bluffnet~_~ptialaska, net 2003 P.O. Box 24 Kenai, AK 99611 *Will Jahrig 283-5600 283-4262 2002 P.O. Box 51 Kenai, AK 99611 Raymond A. Price 283-4967 262-1249 (p) 2002 113 Deepwood Court 262-2510 (f) Kenai, AK 99611 George Spracher 283-9008 2003 P.O. Box 1251 Kenai, AK 99611 **Tom .Thompson 283-4358 262-5731 kreta(~alaska, net 2003 111 Paula Street Kenai, AK 99611 Councilman Jim Bookey 283-4227 283-4227 (p) P.O. Box 326 283-4013 (f) Kenai, AK 99611 Contract Secretary Barbara Roper 262-6577 P.O. Box 4234 Soldotna, AK 99669 . ~. *Chmr **Vice-Chair (10/5/2000)