The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-03-11 Harbor Commission PacketKENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 11, 2002 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/h ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- January 7, 2001. ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5' OLD BUSINESS ao Discussion -- Kenai Coastal Trail and Bluff Erosion Project/Agency Meetin§ Report ITEM 6' NEW BUSINESS ao ITEM 7: Discussion -- 12 / 12 / 01 Resource Development Council letter regarding Draft Proposed ACMP Implementation Regulations. REPORTS ao Director Dock Foreman City Council Liaison ITEM 8' COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/QUESTIONS ITEM 9' INFORMATION ao Kenai City Council Action Agendas of 6 and 20, 2002. ITEM 10' ADJOURNMENT KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING J~ARY 7, 2002 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/k ROLL CALL ITEM 2' ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR ITEM 3' ITEM 4: AGENDA APPROVAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- December 10,2001. ITEM 5' PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 6' OLD BUSINESS ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS ITEM 8' REPORTS Director Dock Foreman City Council Liaison ITEM 9- COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/QUESTIONS ITEM 10: INFO~TION Kenai City Council Action Agendas of December 5 and 19,2001. Reminder -- Council Work Session, 6:00-7'00 p.m., January 16, 2002. ITEM 11' ADJOURNMENT KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 7, 2002 KENAI COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MII~UT~ ITEM 1' CALL TO ORDER/k ROLL CALL Chairman Thompson called the meeting to order at 7'00 p.m. It was sadly noted prior to the meeting that Commissioner McCollum had passed away. Members Present: Others Present: Eldridge, Rogers, Foster, Spracher, Thompson, Graves Councilman Bookey, Public Works Manager Komelis, Contract Secretary Roper ITEM 2' ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR MOTION: Commissioner Spracher MOVED to nominate Tom Thompson as Chairman of the Harbor Commission. Commissioner Eldridge SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. MOTION: Commissioner Spracher MOVED to nominate Barry Eldridge as Vice-Chairman of the Harbor Commission. Commissioner Foster SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 3: AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to approve the agenda as presented and Commissioner Foster SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. ORDERED. SO ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 10, 2001. Komelis requested the following correction to the last paragraph of page one, the third sentence should read: ~Komelis stated the City Manager sent information to the Department of Government Coordination (DGC). The DGC will set a date to meet with PND and a facilitator at which time the City will get further definition and clarification on what the agencies require." MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to approve the minutes as amended and Commissioner Rogers SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. ORDERED. SO Komelis noted the DGC scheduled a meeting for the second week in February with Peratrovich, Nottingham & Drage {PND), the agencies and the City to define and finalize the issues. The DGC will run the meeting without a facilitator and Kornelis will provide a report at the March Harbor meeting. ITEM 5: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD -- None ITEM 6: OLD BUSINESS None ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS Item 7-a. Dip Net Fishery Commissioner Graves referred to a recent newspaper article suggesting the Kenai River going to drift boats only. Graves noted she sits on the Fish and Game Advisory Board and deals with personal use issues. Discussion followed regarding the Kenai River and the need for additional take-out areas for drift boats should the River go to non- 'motorized boats. Graves asked about the dip net fishery and indicated she gets a wide range of complaints from commercial fishers, ranging from concern the fish taken are being sold, that dip netting takes fish away from the commercial fishers, that the beaches are trashed, and that it causes bank erosion problems. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the dip net fishery and Councilman Bookey stated the State dropped the dip netting on the City of Kenai and efforts continue to get the State to provide some solutions to the problems that have arisen as a result of the fishery. ITEM 8: REPORTS 8-a. Director- Komelis stated that things are very quiet. Eldridge asked if there were any leases due to expire this year and Komelis replied he didn't think so but would check on them. A minor discussion took place on the exit road from the boat ramp and Komelis reported the proposal was turned down, however, money was requested for it. 8-bo Dock Foreman -- No report. HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 7, 2002 PAGE 2 8-c. City Council Liaison -- Councilman Bookey reported things were quiet with Council due to the holidays and again noted COmmissioner McCollum passed away. Bookey added, flowers would be sent to the funeral service from Council and the Harbor Commission. It was noted that the next meeting would be held on February 10, 2002. ITEM 9' , , COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/QUESTIONS Commissioner Foster reported he would be absent at the next meeting. Councilman Bookey stated he may also be gone for the next meeting. Commissioner Graves noted the following: · She drove her four-wheeler down the beach and noticed several beetle kill trees were dropped over the bluff by a crane. She stated she also noticed some plant growth in between trees and thought this may be a solution to the bank erosion issue. Graves thought some consideration should be given to seeding those areas with plants that root easily. She discussed the Kenai Coastal Trail with the Borough's Planning Department and the Mayor and was told the Borough would work with the project. ITEM 10: INFORMATION 10-a. 10-b. Kenai City Council Action Agendas of December 5 and 19,2001. R~mind~r-- Council Work Session, 6:00-7:00 p.m., January 16, 2002. ITEM 11' ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to adjourn. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. The meeting adjourned at 7'42 p.m. Minutes recorded and transcribed by: Barbara Roper, Contract Secretary HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 7, 2002 PAGE 3 Engineering Consultants 1506 West 36th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 561-1011 Fax (907) 5634220 February 14, 2002 Keith Kornelis Public Works Manager 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Suite 200 Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 Phone: (907) 283-7535 ext 232 PN&D 99072.03 Subject: February 12, 2002 Agency Meeting for Kenai Bluff Erosion Control and COastal Trail Project Dear Mr. Komelis, Pemtrovich, Nottingham, & Drage, Inc. participated in the agency meeting on February 12, 2002 regarding the Kenai Bluff Erosion Control and Coastal Trail Project. As you know the permit application clock was stopped to allow for additional work. The purpose of the meeting on the 12'a was to better establish what information would be required for the permit application prior to starting the permit clock again. In preparation for this meeting, PN&D created new renderings of the proposed project concept with updated design information. The new images provided a clearer conceptual picture for the permitting agency personnel at the meeting. PN&D also began research to determine if there is new information available and how to best approach the collection of information necessary for the permitting process. The comments from agency personnel regarding the permit submittal were incorporated into a document by PN&D (dated November 14, 2001) and this was the basis for discussion during the meeting. At the conclusion of this meeting, PN&D still believes that the approach presented to the City in the November 15, 2001 letter is correct and prudent. The agency meeting was the first step recommended in · the letter. The next step is to prepare written responses to the agencies and conduct literature review for information already available or recently published that would be helpful in defining the project area. Studies on the hydrological processes of the Kenai River mouth would then be appropriate. This is a first step towards establishing what biological and ecological studies are necessary. Please feel free to call Jennifer Wilson or me at 907-561-1011 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, PERATRO~CH, NOTTINGHAM, & DRAGE. INC. Jim Campbell, P.E. Senior Engineer engineering Consultants 1506 West 35thAvenue · Anchorage, AlasKa 0.9503 · 907-561-1011 · gax 907-563-4220 Novem0er i5. 2001 U ..':. :,.. - : /_001 K¢ith Komciis ANCIIORAGE Public Wo~ Manager OW. GOVERNMENTAL COORDI .NA"II~,... 210 Fidalgo Avenue. Suite 200 '.~. _ -,. Kenai. Alaska 99611-7794 Fax: 907-283-3014 Subject: Kenal Coastal Trail Permminu Process Dear Keith: ,_ This letter presents PN&D's proposed approach for proceeding with permitting for the Kcnai Coastal Trail project. Th~ permitting proccsa is presently stopped, with a§cnmes awaiting additional information to address numerous concerns and commems. For re£ercnce, we attaching a consolidated list of the agency permitting concerns. ORI6tNAL PND 99072 ;- 1. Discuss Concerns with Agencies To obtain n~~~'y permi~ for the @rojec~ we m~t satisfy the agency re,~iewer~ by workin~ with them to addr~ their concerns. As a tim ~tep, we ~hould di~¢u~ the list of concerns wi~h the agency reviewers to make sure that we undcratand the concerns, and ~zo over ways to address the concerns. These discussions should result in a narrowing or focua:ng of ihe concerns ~xpressed by the agenciea, lror exmnpie, many of the agency concerns rcgarci the Kenat River Flare. on the other side o£ the nver. If it is shown that mis area will not be physically et'f~tea by the project, is it necessary, to conduct biological studiea there? A joint meeting organized and led by the DGC az soon aa possible will formaiizc this stm~. 2. Prepare Formal Response Letters Mter discussing the conccma with thc agency reviewers and documenting thc DGC meeting outcome, we would prepare formal re~onsc letters answering the various agencies' co~m'm. We do not expect these response letters to fully sausfy the agencies. The responses should, however, eliminate some of the concerns, and will present our arguments regarding other concerns. In these responses, we should be able to directly address concerns regarding the cause of the bluff erosion (Item I on attached list), concerns regarding water-quail .ty protection of stormwater nmoff (Item ti), suggestions regarding selection of plant speeiea for slope stabilizaaon (Item 12], ano questions regarding the threat to the Senior Center i[tem i3). Keith Komeiis November i 5.2001 Page 2 With respect to other concerns, we would argue [nat the proposed prOJect is iocama very hieh on o thc tid¢tanci~, where it contacts the river only during high ticie, and that this minimize~ many of o th~ potemial impact~ that agen¢i¢~ are concerned about. \Ve do not believe mat the reviewers' fully appreciated or considered thi~ poim. In addition, we would provide rcspon~e~ to many of o · th~ ¢oncem~ regarding ~eciiment transport, which was the ~ub.iect of a UAA study. 3. Determine Studies Required Atter the agencies have reviewed the response letters, we expect that they will have a reduced list of concerns that will require additional studies or work to address, in addition, we hope that the scope of these remaining concerns will be reduced. We expect that Items 2-9 may require studies tO: · Define and assess alternatives to the proposed project {Item 2} · Collect ~ata regarding fish ami wildlife use of the project site {Item 3 · Perform additional sediment transoort analvsi$ l Item · Perform a aver hydraulic analysis {Item · Perform an economic analysis of proposed project and altemauves {Items 2 and · Ass~ project ell'ecru on habitat and biota (Item 7) · Asa~ projfct effects on r¢¢rrafional and commmvial use (Item 8) · Icl~ntify potential mitigation measures (Item 9) 4. Select Experts to Perform Studies Inlmt from several specialties, including biology, oceanography, ~iver engineering and economics, will be required to devetop cost estimates and work plans for the above studies. It is important that experts selected to conduct studies are a_m'~eabte to both. the City and the reviewing agencies iItem 1 $'}. . 5. Prepare Study Plans and Cost Estimate The next step would be to pr,sp~¢ plans to comptete the required studies, and obtain concurrence from the agencies that the proposed studies will address their concerns. These study plans would need to be fairly detailed rc_marding proposed an:as of' study, m~thods, etc. Even with agency inlmt and review, concurrence may consist of non-objection rather than positive approval of proposed study plans, and supplementary studies may be requested at a later dat~. A moderate budget would be required for the project team to complete this work. 6. Fund Additional Studies Detailed cost estimates for performing required studies will be used to allocate funding. Additional fun~g would also be required to prep~e an environmental document based on study remflts regarding impacts of the project. 7. Provide Information to Agencies & Complete Permitting When the required studies are completed, they will be submitted to the permitting agencies to addrr, ss remaining concerns and complete the permitting process. Peltrovich. Nottingham & Drage. inc. Kei~ Kome~is Novemi~er i 5.2~01 Pa~e 3 To date. we nave attemptea to accomplish permitting for the Kena~ Coaztat Trail project with a relatively iow-cost appma¢~ invoiving minimal studies, direct contact with the agenm~, and soumi project ciesign. Conunuauon of the permitting process will require additional expenditur~ by the City. ?N&D propo~e~ to continue work on Stcpa 1-4 as outlined above on a tim~ matcriai~ ba~i~, not to exce~ $20.000. Funding for StCp~ 5-7 cannot be estimated at thi~ dmz. If the costs for pennitting of the proposed or similar project become too hig~ or the process too drawn out. ~e City ha~ anoth~- option tha~ could minimize permitting requirement. ~ option would keep the trail completely above the high tide linc using a sheeroite wall along the entire len~h of the trail. This opuon has significantly higher construction costs than the armor stone option proposed on the permit application. Please call Jim Campbell or me if you have any questions. Sincerely. ., Drams Nottingham. P.E. Prudent Attachment Pemtm~o~ Nottlnejnam & Draeje, Inc.. Keith Kornelis :rom: Sent: To: Subject: Resource Development Council f... Graves, Kathleen [KGraves@borough.kenai.ak. us] Friday, February 08, 2002 11:10 AM 'kornelis@ci. kenai, ak. us' FW: Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc..htm > ..... Original Message ..... > From: Graves, Kathleen > Sent- Friday, February 08, 2002 11-08 AM > To- 'kornelis@cr.kenai.ak.us' > Subject: Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc..btm > > <<Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc,.htm>> > > Dear Keith, > Please think about this letter. I will most likely not attend the DGC > meeting on the 19th. If you could reproduce this for the Council and > Committee members it might be helpful. > Let me know what you think please, > Thank-you, > Kathleen tcesource Development Council Ior AlasKa, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Growing Alaska Through Resl~onsible Resource Development Draft Proposed ACMP lmplem'entation Regulations Comments December 12, 2001 Mr. Randy Bates Division of Govemmental Coordination Office of the Governor P.O. Box 110030 Juneau, Alaska 99811-0030 Re: Draft Proposed ACMP Implementation Regulations Dear Mr. Bates: On behalf of the Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc. (RDC), I am writing to express our serious concerns with DGC's draft proposed Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) Implementation Regulations. The ACMP has an enormous impact on RDC's member companies from all basic industry sectors operating in nearly every region of Alaska. Developing a clear, well-organized, equitable framework for the ACMP will be critical to ensure Alaska's regulatory climate is one that does not unduly discourage private sector investment and economic development. We do not believe these proposed regulations succeed in this regard. As you know, RDC is a private, membership-fimded, non-profit trade association. Our members include individuals and leading companies from the mining, timber, oil and gas, tourism and fishing industries. Also within our ranks are local communities, Native corporations, organized labor and industry support firms. Our mission is to grow Alaska's economy through the responsible development of the state's natural resources. In developing the following comments RDC has worked closely with the Alaska Oil & Gas Association, the Alaska Miners Association and the Alaska Support Industry Alliance, as well as many other individual companies within RDC's membership. Our concerns with the proposed regulations fall into four areas: A) schedule discipline, B) homeless stipulations, C) applicability and scope, and D) the elevation and petition process. Schedule Discipline Of inmost importance is the creation of a clear, efficient, and predictable process for making consistency determinations under the ACMP. The unpredictable nature of the 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 file://D:\Keith\C'A20I ~20P\Kenai ~A20Coastal ~20Trail\Resource'A20Development ~A20Council :,... 02/08/2002 ~csourc¢ tJevelopment UOUll¢ll Ior AlasKa, Inc. Page 2 of 3 various timelines makes the process inherently difficult to navigate. As currently drafted, the regulations prevent an applicant from predicting when the process clock will start, let alone when it will end. For example, there is no deadline for a determination of completeness, nor for publication of the required public notice. Moreover, the start day can be negotiated among the state agencies without the agreement of the applicant. Once the clock does start, extensive schedule modifications can be made at the discretion of the coordinating agency, again without the approval of the applicant. Most troubling is the ability to extend the schedule indefinitely for "complex issues." Until more certainty can be injected into the review schedule, the regulated community will suffer unnecessary costs and delays. Homeless Stipulations The current practice of imposing homeless stipulations through the consistency review process is unlawful in our opinion. Unfortunately, the current draft regulations would institutionalize this practice and call into question the legality of the ACMP. In adopting the Alaska Coastal Management Act, the Legislature made a policy decision that the ACMP would not create yet another permit. The Legislature did not authorize the imposition of conditions under the ACMP. Neither the Coastal Policy Council, DGC, nor any other govemmental entity is authorized to impose permit conditions to ensure consistency with the ACMP under AS46.40. Yet DGC's regulations attempt to create a "networked" system by delaying project permits so that conditions no agency is authorized to impose can be attached to the agency permits under the auspices of the ACMP. Provisions within the proposed regulations that attempt to create substantive conditioning authority are invalid. DGC should only determine whether the project, as proposed, is consistent or inconsistent. If DGC believes the project must be modified to be consistent, it should find the project inconsistent and identify the inconsistencies. Most applicants will continue to work with the resource agencies and DGC to address concerns and modify the project, if needed, before the f'mal consistency determination. Applicability & Scope The proposed regulations lack clarity regarding applicability and scope. These issues are addressed in numerous provisions, none of which set forth the same standard. Moreover, the regulations provide no objective criteria for determining applicability or scope. Rather, each is left to the discretion of the coordinating agency on a case-by-case basis. RDC recommends that applicability and scope be def'med by the following three criteria. First, consistency reviews should only be required when the project is located within the defined boundaries of the coastal zone. Second, the scope of the review should be limited to those activities on the C-List. Finally, only those activities which have a "direct and significant impact to any coastal use or resource" should be reviewed. Both state and federal statute support use of the "direct and significant impact" standard. Elevations & Petitions The proposed elevation and petition processes are areas of unnecessary confusion and significant concern to RDC. As currently drafted, it is not possible to complete the petition process in 30 days as state law requires. This discrepancy must be corrected. Furthermore, the two-tiered elevation system is overly cumbersome and of limited 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 file://D:\Keith\C ~20I ~A20PkKenai ~A20Coastal ~A20Trail\Resource ~A20Development ~A20Council ?... 02/08/2002 tqesource Development L;ouncll Ior AlaSKa, Inc. Page 3 of 3 benefit, and therefore RDC proposes the director-level elevation be eliminated. The elevation process should consist only of a single review by the agency commissioners. This change alone will greatly simplify the process. Conclusion RDC believes the ACMP process is imended to serve a procedural coordination function that networks existing resource agency permitting authorities as they apply to projects having a significant and direct impact on coastal resources. In fact, in many cases our members have come to appreciate and rely upon the coordination aspects of the ACMP process. However, the benefits of the coordination function to the regulated community are outweighed in the proposed regulations by lack of schedule discipline, lack of clarity regarding applicability and imposition of unlawful homeless stipulations. RDC understands the time and effort DGC has put into the development of these proposed regulations. We appreciate the many productive changes that have been incorporated in the latest draft. Nevertheless, there remain several substantial shortcomings in our view. As an alternative to the current process, we suggest DGC consider negotiated mlemaking in an effort to move forward in a productive and meaningful way. This opportunity to make real and effective regulatory improvements to encourage ongoing investment in the economic growth.and development of Alaska should not be rushed. Thank you for your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL for Alaska, Inc. Tadd Owens Executive Director cc: Governor Tony Knowles Lieutenant Governor Fran Ulmer Pat Galvin, Director, DGC Commissioner Pat Pourchot, DNR Commissioner Michele Brown, DEC Commissioner Frank Rue, DF&G Home IWhat is RDC? l Issues I Action Alerts i Legislature I Resource Review[ Links I Contact RDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 file://D:XKeith\C ¼20I ~A20P\Kenai %20Coastal ~A20TrailLResource ~A20Development ~A20Council z... 02/08/2002 AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 2002 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www.ci.kenai.ak.us ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) , Ed Flanagan, Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development -- Present the SHARP Award/Wastewater Treatment Plant Personnel. . David Burnett, AAI/Engineering Support, Inc. -- Pacific Rim Institute of Safety and Management/2001 in Review. ITEM C: PUBLIC HEARINGS o , Resolution No. 2002-08 -- Awarding the Bid to Eagle Enterprises, Inc. for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Firefighting for the Total Amount of $70,299.04. Resolution No. 2002-09 -- Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Travel Agency Concession Agreement for the Kenai Municipal Airport. . *2002 Liquor License Renewals -- George's Casino Bar-- Beverage Dispensary Upper Deck-- Beverage Dispensary Mr. D's-- Beverage Dispensary Alaskalanes-- Recreational Site ITEM D: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS . Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission -1- . 5. 6. 7. ITEM E: o ITEM F: ITEM G: ITEM H: , , . o o Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Kenai Convention & Visitors Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report MINUTES *Regular Meeting of January 16, 2002. *Work Session Notes of.January 4, 2002. *Work Session Notes of January 16, 2002. CORRESPONDENCE OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 *Ordinance No. 1947-2002 -- Amending KMC 23.55.050 to Make Part- Time Employees Eligible for Salary Step Increases Based on Longevity and Satisfactory Performance and Amending the Salary Structure Table to Delete a Separate Part-Time Hourly Schedule and Incorporate It Into the Regular Salary Structure Table. *Ordinance No. 1948-2002 -- Amending KMC 1.90.030, Changing the Qualifications for the Beautification Committee, Harbor, Parks and Recreation, and Library Commissions to Allow Up to Two Members Each to be Non-Residents of the City of Kenai. *Ordinance No. 1949-2002 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $7,500 in the Airport Terminal Enterprise Fund for the Purchase of a Range for the Airport Terminal Restaurant. *Ordinance No. 1950-2002 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $1,290 in the General Fund Library Department for a State Grant. Approval -- Change Order No. 3/Kenai Airport ARFF/SRE Facility -- Lighting Changes for the Amount of $5,051.00. Approval-- Termination of Leases/James H. Doyle/Gusty #4, Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 3 and GUsty #5, Lot 4A, Block 3. -2- Discussion -- Conditional Use Permit/Certificate of Compliance Yearly Report Requirements. ~' ~' '~/,~ 10. Discussion -- Industry/City Businesses Breakfast ~~ ~~~11,.~ Discussion-- SB 231/Authorization to Lease Correctional Facility Space ~,~. ~ ~~~~, / ,witl? .Municip,Eitie,s. I/ITEM I: REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITEM J: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. City Clerk ITEM K: DISCUSSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council EXECUTIVE SESSION- None Scheduled ITEM L: ADJOURNMENT -3- AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL- REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 2002 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http' //www. ci.kenai.ak.us 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION: PROPOSED LIBRARY EXPANSION ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *Ail items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (10 minutes) ITEM C: PUBLIC HEARINGS o . , Ordinance No. 1947-2002 -- Amending KMC 23.55.050 to Make Part- Time Employees Eligible for Salary Step Increases Based on Longevity and Satisfactory Performance and Amending the Salary Structure Table to Delete a Separate Part-Time Hourly Schedule and Incorporate It Into the Regular Salary Structure Table. Ordinance No. 1948-2002 -- Amending KMC 1.90.030, Changing the Qualifications for the Beautification Committee, Harbor, Parks and Recreation, and Library Commissions to Allow Up to Two Members Each to be Non-Residents of the City of Kenai. Ordinance No. 1949-2002 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $7,500 in the Airport Terminal Enterprise Fund for the Purchase of a Range for the Airport Terminal Restaurant. . Ordinance No. 1950-2002 -- Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $1,290 in the General Fund Library Department for a State Grant. 5~ Resolution No. 2002-10 -- Supporting the Creation of the Challenger Learning Center of Alaska Foundation. ITEM D: COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS o 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Council on Aging Airport Commission Harbor Commission Library Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Planning & Zoning Commission Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Kenai Convention & Visitors Bureau Board c. Alaska Municipal League Report ITEM E: MINUTES f-/-t/~/~, 1. *Regular M~bruary 6 ITEM F: CORRESPONDENCE ,2002. ITEM G: OLD BUSINESS ITEM H: NEW BUSINESS e . , Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 Approval -- Termination of Special Use Permit/Portion of Tract A, General Aviation Apron//2 -- Kenai Air Alaska. Approval -- Assignment of Real Estate Lease and Agreement/Tract B, Kenai Tidelands Survey No. 2 -- Snug Harbor Seafoods, Inc. to U.S. Small Business Administration. Discussion-- New Well House No. 4/Site Location ITEM I: REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITEM J: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS . City Manager Attorney City Clerk ITEM K: DISCUSSION , Citizens (five minutes) Council EXECUTIX~ S~SION- None Scheduled ITEM L: ADJOURNMENT