HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-04-03 Historic District Board Packet - Work SessionHISTORIC DISTRI:¢T BOARD
April $, ~000 - 7':00 p.m.
*** WORK SES$:I:ON A6ENDA***
Ken~i City H~II
Purpose of meeting
o Define goals taking into consideration recommendations
from City Council
o Produce plan to present to City Council on 4/17/00
Discuss Council's concerns
o Es~ob ishing ~uo~ums
o ~oals
o fieog~aphical boundaries
o Funding/~ronts for projects - costs to city ($ and
personnel)
o Responsibilities for projects
o Other
Discuss possible future goals/projects (Suggestions)
o Inventory historical items
o Find suitable t~act of land to display historical objects in
proximity of or on the walking tour
o ]Investigate grants funding to meet goals (Cost to city?)
o Pursue networking with other agencies and city boards and
commissions (Historical Society, Visitor Cente~, Parks &
Recreation, Beautification Commission, etc.)
o Pursue possibility of historical display at airport possiby in
conjunction with Visitor's Center (Kiosk)
o 5hkituk' Village Proposed Park Plan (Status/Update)
o Implement a "Spring Clean-up Day" for Old Town
~ Recruit the Beautification Committee and Parks &
Recreation Department to co-sponsor the event
, Enlist property owners' support
Historic District Boa~d
Wo~k Session Agenda
Page 2
April 3, 2000
o "Adopt-a-corner" Flower Beds
o Place benches along walking tour (Enlist groups to donate or
build benches, i.e. scouts, sChool groups, service
orgenizetions.)
o Place trash receptacles along walking tour (Enlist groups-
see ebove.) Would need to receive essistence from Perks &
Recreation to empty certs.
o Historic Preservetion Week (Yeerly ectivities. Perhaps
start e treditionel ectivity. Possibly plen events with the
Visitor Center.)
o Develop objective ~eview c~ite~ia fo~ development within
Old Town
o Review code (K~¢ 14.20.105) , Is it clear?
, hoes it need revision?
, Recommend possible changes (subjective vs. objective)
, Discuss ~esponsibilities ~nd Board's ~ole in ~elation to
code.
Prepare recommendation for City Council based on above discussions
o Possible suggestions
~ goard be allo~ed to continue
, Meetings be held more frequently (bi-monthly or
monthly)
~ List planned goals and activities
HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD
April 3, 2000- 7:00 p.m.
Kenai City Hall
Chair- Mike Huhndorf
Work Session Notes
Members Present: Ethel Clausen, Bill Klu§e, Emily DeForest, Michael
Huhndorf, Pam Russell, Sasha Lind§ren, Gwen Preston
Also Present:
Councilman Joe Moore, Administrative Assistant Marilyn
Kebschull, Contract Secretary Barb Roper
Introductions were made for the benefit of the three new members. Sasha
Lindgren, Gwen Preston and Pam Russell.
Huhndorf explained the purpose of the work session, which was to define goals
taking into consideration the recommendations from Council and to produce a
plan to present to the City Council at the HDB April 17 meeting.
The following topics were discussed:
Council Concerns: It was noted that Council's main concern was whether or not
the HDB could maintain quorums as it has been a real problem in the past.
Kebschull pointed out there were four meetings scheduled last year and two
were cancelled due to lack of quorum. The overall consensus was that with a
full board now it should not be a problem making a quorum.
Member Residency Requirements: A question was raised on whether or not
there was a legal Board due to residency requirements outlined in the
ordinance. It was noted, KMC 14.20.105 (b) (1), last sentence states, "A
majority, plus one member must be residents of the City of Kenai." It was noted
that three members lived outside the city limits. This issue will need to be
addressed by Council.
Goals: A lengthy discussion took place on goals of the HDB. Kebschull
reported that of the seven goals set last year, none were accomplished. Some of
the goals (old and new) discussed included obtaining a tract of land to display
artifacts and large historical items currently being stored at the city
maintenance yard; performing an inventory of such items; identity of other
structures or sites that are historical in nature; community education; and
review and clarification of KMC 14.20.105. It was decided the Board should
start out with one goal that would have some activities beneath it. An example
would be obtaining a tract of land to display the historical items and the
inventory of such items would be part of that goal.
Historic District Board Work Session
April 3, 2000
Page I
Certified Local Government (CLG) Status' A lengthy discussion ensued
regarding CLG status. Kluge thought the issue should be the main focus of the
work session and asked what the benefit was to the city by having CLG status.
Kebschull replied that it only allowed the city access to various grants.
Kebschull also noted, administering the grants costs the city money. Kluge
asked if maintaining the CLG status would provide for tax credits to those living
within the historic boundaries. Kebschull noted she was not aware of a tie
between the CLG status and tax credits but individuals could apply if eligible to
do so.
Kebschull stated that if the city didn't want to maintain their CLG status, the
Board could continue under the city. Discussion ensued regarding continuing
without CLG status and it was noted the code would have to be rewritten if the
city decided to drop the CLG.
Frequency of.Meetings: Discussion took place on the frequency of meetings and
it was noted the meetings were currently held quarterly and the majority didn't
think that was often enough. Suggestions for more frequent meetings included
once per month or every other month. A decision will be made at the meeting
on April 17, 2000.
KMC 14.20.105' It was noted that if the city decides to discontinue their CLG
status, KMC 14.20.105 would have to be rewritten.
Historical Society and Historic District Board: Discussion took place on whether
or not there was a duplication of efforts between the Historic .District Board and
the Historical Society. It was noted the Historical Society was independent of
the city but the two groups could certainly work together on many historical
issues. Emily DeForest reported she is a member of the Historical Society and
the group could assist with some projects.
Community Education of HDB' Community education was an ongoing topic of
discussion and the majority agreed the issue was very important and should
have priority. Various methods of educating the community were discussed.
Past Studies and Surveys of the Historic District: Kebschull provided copies of
old studies and surveys for the Board to review. The first study completed in
1985 was discussed and it appeared it was the catalyst to form the Historic
District Board. Moore asked Kebschull to contact the group who performed the
study to see if they had any input as to whether or not maintaining CLG status
is helpful. Kebschull answered she would attempt to make the call. Kebschull
pointed out there would, more than likely, be a fee to obtain the advice and
that's one of the reasons the city uses OHA.
Lindgren noted that there are many OHA changes being made at this time and
they are working very hard to stay in existence.
Historic District Board Work Session
April 3, 2000
Page 2
Old Town Improvements and Clean Up: A brief discussion took place on
recommendations to clean up Old Town. Some of the suggestions included
placing benches, trashcans, corner flowerbeds, etc. It was recommended the
HDB contact the Beautification Committee for assistance in this effort. It was
also suggested the Rotary Club or other organizations be contacted for
donations of trash receptacles or benches.
Recommendations to City Council
Kebschull stated the Board needed to come up with a proposal to City Council
regarding their plans for the year and the commitment to make it work. After
much discussion the following was agreed upon:
le
The HDB will ask the City Council whether or not it is in the city's best
interest to maintain CLG status. If so, then the code should be revisited
with regard to development in Old Town. If not, then the HDB will
become a Board of the city only and will serve as other committees do.
e
If Council decides not to maintain CLG status, then KMC 14.20.105
would need to be rewritten.
e
HDB will establish realistic goals and limit the number so they can be
more achievable. Suggested goals include:
ao
Obtain a tract of land to display historic artifacts and equipment
currently being stored in the city's maintenance yard.
bo
Inventory such artifacts and equipment.
Ce
Continue and enhance community education.
After a general recap, the work session adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Bar~bara Roper, Conttr~ct S~cretary
Historic District Board Work Session
April 3, 2000
Page 3
.o m
MEMO:
CITY OF KENA
210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794
TELEPHONE 907-283-7535
FAX 907-283-3014 ~
TO'
THRU'
FROM'
Richard A. Ross, City Manager//.,_1
Jack La Shot, Public Works Manager~..~"
Marilyn Kebschull, Planning & Zoning~Administration
DATE' April 6, 2000
SUBJECT: Historic District Board Work Session- 4~3~00
The Historic District Board met in a work session on April 3rd to discuss and prepare a
proposal for City Council regarding the future of the Board. Attached is a copy of the
minutes from the session that provides a synopsis of the discussions. The last page of the
minutes lists the Boards' recommendations.
From administration's perspective, I would like to clarify some points in the minutes and
add a few comments and concerns.
Council Concerns' The minutes accurately reflect the discussion regarding
quorums. A further concern addressed was whether or not the Board was
restricted to acting only on issues within the Townsite Historic District. It was
noted that the survey that was completed and the signage project both
included properties outside of the zone. In addition, KMC 14.20.105 (c) (4),
(5), (6), and (7) require the Board to provide expertise and educational
assistance to the community.
Member Residency Requirements: KMC 14.20.105 (b) (1) states, "The Board
will consist of a minimum of seven members with a demonstrated interest,
competence, or knowledge in historic preservation, appointed for terms of not
less than three years. A majority, plus one member must be residents of
the City of Kenai." The Board believes this issue may need to be addressed
by Council.
Memo
Historic District Board Work Session- 4/3/00
Page 2
Goals:. As noted in the minutes, there was a lengthy discussion on goals. The
Council may wish to review the agenda from the work session for the entire
list of possible goals discussed. Board member Lindgren recommended an
additional goal. Ms. Lindgren recommended, as is required in KMC
14.20.105 (c) (4) that the survey be extended to include properties within the
entire city that may be historic in nature.
Certified Local Government (CLG) Status: As is noted in the minutes and
Board's recommendation, the City Council should determine if it is in the best
interest of the City to maintain this status. I have again contacted Office of
History and Archaeology (OHA), Joan Antonson, to clarify the benefits of this
status. This remains as stated in previous memos that the major benefit is
being able to participate in grant fund programs. In addition, it was noted the
City may receive technical assistance from OHA, the City must review
nominations for the Historic Register, and if there is development within the
City in a sensitive area, the CLG is given the opportunity to participate in the
environmental review and assist with mitigation of problems. I asked OHA
that updated information regarding CLG stares be sent to the City. A copy of
that information is attached.
Frequency of Meetings: As the minutes reflect, it appeared that the majority
of the members felt that more frequent meetings would help the Boards'
productivity. There was a concern noted about summer meetings and possible
attendance problems due to work conflicts. The possibility of not holding
summer meetings and calling them only when necessary was mentioned.
Administration believes this could cause problems as KMC 14.20.105 (c)(8)
requires that all building permit applications within the zone be reviewed by
the Board prior to being issued and summer is the busiest time for building
permits.
KMC 14.20.105' As is noted in the minutes, if the CLG status were
discontinued, the code would need to be rewritten. Administration believes
that even if the status is maintained, the code should be reviewed and possibly
rewritten. The requirement that the Board review all building permits
within the zone may cause delays for citizens. It would appear, that unless
there is a historic property involved, that building permits should be issued
using the same procedure for the rest of the City. There are other areas in the
code that are unclear and could be clarified.
Historic Society and Historic District Board: Discussion as noted in the
minutes.
Community Education by HDB: As noted in the minutes.
Past Studies and Survey's of the Historic District: The study mentioned was
produced by the Kasprisin Design Group in 1985. I attempted to reach this
group as requested. There is no longer a listing in the Seattle directory under
this name.
Old Town Improvements and Clean Up: As noted in the minutes.
Memo
Historic District Board Work Session- 4/3/00
Page 3
Regarding tax credits being tied to the CLG status; I once again contacted OHA for
clarification. Ms. Antonson advised that credits are not tied to the status. She forwarded
information about the program. I have attached a copy of this information.
If I can provide further clarification regarding any of this information, let me know. I
will be out of town on the 17th and unable to attend the work session scheduled with
Council. Jack La Shot will be attending in my absence.
Attachments
KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
PAGE ?
ordinance of what may or may not be allowed on residential properties. Additionally,
the Commission was very adamant to hold a work session with council.
Attorney Graves reported he wrote a livestock ordinance for Commissioner Goecke and
it had gone through several drafts. He noted, he wrote the ordinance on the guidelines
of what Goecke had suggested and submitted it to Animal Control Officer Godek for
his review. Godek had some issues with the ordinance and Graves passed that
information on to Goecke. Graves added, there was a draft ordinance on the table for
review and it had been forwarded to the Commission. Kebschull explained, the
Commission reviewed the draft ordinance at their September meeting and that was
when Bannock requested it be held for a work session. She added, the ordinance as it
'was drafted, would limit livestock to the Rural Residential Zone, to lots equal or
greater than three acres. Graves noted, livestock, in the draft ordinance, was defined
as large animals, i.e. cows, alpacas, horses, etc. He added, chickens and small farm
animals were not covered in the ordinance. Graves stated, the ordinance was drafted
for debate and was not the final version.
It was questioned whether the ordinance would allow for grandfather rights and
Graves answered, yes. He explained, the grandfathered lots would be addressed as
non-conforming use to cover that scenario.
Council approved a work session with the Planning ga Zoning Commission on March
15 at 6:00 p.m. Clerk Freas was requested to remind council of the work session.
Ross reported, he would be filing a letter of appeal with Clerk Freas in regard to the
Commission's approval of an encroachment permit at 1110 Channel Way, Kenai.
D-7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees
D-Ta. Beautification Committee-- Councilwoman Swarner reported the
Committee met on February 8 and discussed goals and objectives, as well as a theme
for the summer. They also discussed an Adopt-A-Park program, weeding, and a Yard-
of-the-Week program. She added, if council had suggestions about the Yard-of-the-
Week program to talk to her or Parks ga Recreation Director Frates.
Councilwoman Porter stated she wanted to sponsor one of the circle planters and
added, she would be happy to have volunteers from council to work with her.
D-7b.
Historic District Board
H-9 discussion was moved ahead and held at place in the meeting.
Mike Huhndorf-- Noted he was the current chair of the Historic District Board.
Huhndorf stated he was aware the Board was under scrutiny, the meetings were cut
to four a year, and establishing quorums had been a problem. He suggested the
KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
PAGE 8
Board had also listed too many goals and objectives last year and were unable to
accomplish them. Huhndorf added, he believed retaining the Board had merits when
considering the requirements of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
Huhndorf noted the letter from Bill Kluge (added to the agenda) explained the Board
chose only one goal this year, i.e. developing an area where the old machinery now
stored could be exhibited to accompany the walking tour.
Councilman Moore noted there were three members of the Board present, i.e. Ethel
Clausen, Emily DeForest, and Mike Huhndorf. He added, DeForest informed him prior
to the meeting that she had done some research and found grant money was available
for "bricks and mortar" for preservation of articles.
Councilwoman Porter thanked Huhndorf for attending the meeting. She asked if he
knew if it was a lack of interest that was keeping members from attending the
meetings and if it was a lack of interest, was there a point to keeping the Board.
Huhndorf answered he had been a member of the Board for approximatelY five years.
He was unsure of why other members did not attend meetings. He noted there had
been several resignations and suggested lack of communication was a problem in
promoting enthUsiasm for history. Porter noted, because the Board had a project, it
might encourage enthusiasm on the Board. Huhndorf stated, with the Board focusing
on one goal and having members with a fair amount of knowledge, he believed they
had a better chance of succeeding. He also noted, in nominating properties as
historical sites, he didn't know if it should stop with the Townsite District Zone.
Councilwoman Swarner noted there were several applications included in the packet
for both the Beautification Committee and Historic District Board. She noted she
spoke with one of the applicants who listed interest in both the Committee and Board
and wanted to be appointed to the Board. Swarner added, she wanted to see the
Board. functioning, especially if there were people who wanted to be involved. She
noted, she was concerned about the quorum issue and suggested the time and day of
meetings needed to be considered in setting the meetings. Huhndorf suggested he, as
chair, needed to be more active and thought with only four meetings a year, more
phone communication was needed.
Councilman Bookey stated he had concern about the continuation of the Board for
some time. He added, when the Board was formed, he understood it was their charge
to take care of the activities of construction or development in Old Town. He noted, he
believed the Board had gotten into a program where they wanted to do projects and
didn't believe that was ever their charge. Bookey added, he wasn't saying that
couldn't be part of their charge, but he felt the focus was lost. He added, he believed
the Board was to be in line with the Planning & Zoning Commission so that if there
KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
PAGE 9
was development going on in Old Town, the Board would be involved. Bookey stated,
if there were no quorums and nO meetings, and there was development in Old Town,
there would be a problem.
Bookey referred to the information included in the packet in which it suggested the
Board could have only two meetings a year or be on call. He stated he had some
hesitancy to do that. Porter asked Huhndorf if the Board was getting the help needed
from administration. Huhndorf answered, he had no complaints about the help or
lack of it. He added, he hoped the historic nature of the community could be
enhanced and thought the Board was an excellent way in which to do it.
Bookey stated he believed there were two issues: taking on projects and to aid in
regulation of development in the Townsite District Zone. Williams stated he believed
the Board had accomplished the task they set out to do and what council envisioned
them to do was yet to be completed. He noted, he believed boards, commissions, etc.
function better when they are busy and thought council needed to reexamine the issue
of the Board and consider including the Historical Society and Kenai Visitors and
Cultural Center and their roles as private organizations in exploring the community's
history. He added, council had discussed previously the identifying of property on
which to place a concrete slab and displaying of antique machinery, etc. He suggested
council charge the Board with finding funding, etc. to accomplish that project.
Huhndorf stated he liked that idea and felt the Board, along with the Historical Society
and Visitors Center, offered a forum for preserving the history of Kenai.
Emily, I)el~otest ~ DeForest noted she was a member of the Historic District Board.
DeForest stated money was available through State Historical Preservation Society
(eligible for matching grants) for preservation of historical artifacts, including shelter
or education. She noted, the matching portion varied from 50/50 to 25/75 and a
better percentage was offered for education.
Williams stated he saw an opportunity for the city to charge the Board to inventory
potential historical items, investigate property on which to display it (both city and
private properties), grants and costs involved, combining of thought between the
Board, Historical Society and KVCC, and be involved in the shaping of the core of Old
Town. He added, there was a lot that could be done by a diligent group. DeForest
noted, she also learned the Board, in investigating historical buildings, etc., did not
have to limit their review to the Townsite Historic District.
Councilman Bannock stated that in learning more about the Certified Local
Government, he felt there were two items of discussion; geographical boundaries of the
zone and the rules governing the zone. He added, council needed to decide if they
wanted the Board to adhere to the rules in the code or incorporate more of a historical
society of work to the Board. Bannock noted a comment in Kebschull's memorandum
was that she verified the benefit of maintaining the CLG status was to participate in
KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
PAGE 10
the Historical Preservation Fund Grant Program. He added, he agreed with that and
understood it. He then noted Kluge's letter mentioned maintaining the CLG status
which in turn, allowed individuals to apply for tax credit on private developments of
historic significance. He asked if that was true and if it would be lost if the CLG
status wasn't maintained.
Kebschull answered she wasn't familiar if that was dependent on being a CLG, but
knew there was an opportunity to apply for tax credits. She added, it was suggested
in the CLG information, that the city offer tax credits. Huhndorf noted, the federal
government made it possible to apply for tax credits. Bannock asked if there was a
direct tie between an individual applying for tax credits and CLGs. Kebschull stated
she was not aware.
Williams reviewed KMC 14.24.105 which defined the Townsite Historic Zone and the
Historic District Board. He noted, he believed there was a lot the Board could do
under the code and agreed with Bannock that further discussion could take place in
regard to the current code and the possibility of expanding the charge of the Board's
work.
Swarner suggested a work session be held to further discuss the issue and suggested
Gwen Preston (one of the applicants for Historic District Board) be appointed to the
board. Bookey questioned making appointments to the Board if their future was
unknown. Frazer stated his reluctance in turning down volunteers and that there was
a problem in attaining quorums. It was noted budget work sessions would be coming
up and there was some apprehension in setting a work session in regard to the Board.
Discussion continued in regard to making appointments to the Board and if there
were any specifications for the appointments. The code was reviewed and it was noted
the majority of the Board plus one, had to be Kenai residents and to the extent
available, three board members were to have expertise in the fields of architecture,
archeology, and history.
Porter stated she thought the appointment should be made since volunteers were
available and that new blood on the board may be what was needed to go forward.
Williams explained the filling of the seats would be a signal to the Board that council
wanted some action to take place. Williams suggested to appoint the applicants
suggested, charge the Board with the responsibility to come back to council with a
plan, including only the geographical area discussed in the code or whether it would
include other areas of the city.
Discussion followed and council directed the Board to hold a special meeting prior to
their regular meeting of April 17. At the special meeting, the Board was directed to
develop a plan for the zone or outside of the zone. The Board were then directed to
present their plan to the council during their April 17 meeting. Council requested the
Planning & Zoning Commission also be invited to the April 17 meeting.
KENAI CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
PAGE. 11
Alexandra Lindgren, pamela Russell and Gwen Preston were appointed to the
Historical District Board without objection.
Swarner requested Judy Buffington be appointed to the Beautification Committee and
council had no objections.
D-7c. Kenai Visitors/~ Convention Bureau Board -- Councilman Bookey
reported the next meeting was scheduled for February 24 at 5'00 p.m.
D-7d.
Alaska Municipal League Report -- No report.
BREAK TAKEN: 8:44 P.M.
BACK TO ORDER: 8:58 P.M.
ITEM E: MINUTES
E-Xo
Regular Meeting of February 2, 2000.
Approved by consent agenda.
ITEM F:
CORRESPONDENCE-- None.
ITEM G:
OLD BUSINESS-- None.
ITEM H:
NEW BUSINESS
H-Xo
Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified
MOTION:
Councilwoman Swarner MOVED to pay the bills and Councilman Bookey SECONDED
the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED.
H-2o
Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500
MOTION:
Councilman Moore MOVED to approve the purchase orders exceeding $2,500 marked
"substitute." Councilwoman Porter SECONDED the motion. There were no objections.
SO ORDERED.
14.20.080
(g) Parking Requirements: As required by this
chapter.
(Ords. 925, 1009)
14.20.090 Suburban Residential Zones (RS,
RS-l, RS-2 Zones).
(a) Intent. The RS Zone is intended to provide for
medium density residential developmem in
areas which will be provided with common
utility systems. The specific intent in establish-
ing · this zone is:
(1) To separate residential structures to an
extent which will allow for adequate
light, air, and privacy;
(2) To prohibit uses which would:
(i) violate the residential character of
the environment;
(ii) generate heavy traffic in predomi-
nantly residential areas.
(b) Principal Permitted Uses: As allowed in Land
Use Table.
(c) Conditional Uses: As allowed in Land Use
Table and subject to the provisions of this
chapter.
(d) Accessory Uses: As defined (see Definitions).
(e) Home Occupations: Uses as allowed by this
chapter.
(f) Development Requirements: As described in
Development Requirements Table.
(g) Parking Requirements: As required by this
chapter.
(Ords. 925, 1009)
14.20.100 Urban Residential Zone (RU
Zone).
(a) Intern. The RU Zone is intended to provide for
apartments and compatible uses in areas near
centers of shopping, services, and employment
where high density residential developmem is
desirable.
(b) Principal Permitted Uses: As allowed in Land
Use Table.
(c) Conditional Uses: As allowed in Land Use
Table and subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(d) Accessory Uses: As defined (see Defil~tions).
(e) Home Occupations: Uses as allowed by this
chapter.
(f) DeVelopmem Requirements: As described in
Development Requirements Table.
(g) Parking Requirements: As required by this
chapter.
(Ord. 925)
14.20.105 Townsite Historic (TSH) Zoning
District.
(a) Intern. The TSH Zoning District is intended to
provide for a mixed, controlled use in a desig-
nated area, which will protect and enhance the
historic character of the zone. The goal of the
TSH zone is to manage all new development,
reconstruction and alterations within the zone.
The intent of the Townsite Historic Review
Board is to enhance and identify the City of
Kenai's heritage, to present this heritage in a
manner that promotes civic pride, and to foster
an awareness of where we as a people have
evolved.
(b) Historic District Board. A historic district
Board will be established to regulate develop-
ment within the TSH zone. The following
provisions will govern the Board's activities
through the State of Alaska Certified Local
Government Program:
(1) .The Board will consist of a minimum of
seven members with a demonstrated
interest, competence, or knowledge in
historic preservation, appointed for terms
of not less than three years. A majority,
plus one member must be residents of the
City of Kenai.
(2) To the extent available, three Board
members shall be professionals, as cle-
f'meal by National Park Service regula-
tions, from the disciplines of history,
architecture or architectural history, and
archeology.
(3) The Board will meet twice each year or
as necessary and conduct business in
accordance with the Open Meeting Laws
250
14.20.105
of Alaska. This includes public notifica-
tion of meeting place, time and agendas.
(4) Written minutes of each Board meeting
will be prepared and made available for
public inspection.
(c) Historic District Board Duties:
(1) The Board shall make recommendations
to the Kenai Planning and Zoning Com-
mission as to the area of the city to be
included within the zone and any adjust-
ments to the boundaries in the future.
(2) The Board shall review zoning require-
ments and review all proposed changes to
the zoning law within the TSH Zoning
District.
(3) The Board shall schedule a minimum of
two meetings annually and special meet-
ings as requested by the Planning Depart-
ment to review proposed building permit
applications within the zone or other
business considered necessary by the
Planning Department.
(4) The Board shall conduct or cause to be
conducted a survey of the historic, archi-
tectural, and archaeological resources
within the community. The survey shall
be compatible with the Alaska Heritage
Resources Survey and able to be readily
integrated into statewicle comprehensive
historic preservation planning and other
planning processes. Survey and inventory
documents shall be maintained to protect
the site location(s) from possible vandal-
ism. The survey shall be updated annual-
ly. (Ord. 1636-95)
(5) The Board shall review and comment to
the State Historic Preservation Officer on
all proposed National Register nomina-
tions for properties within the boundaries
of the City. When the TSH Board consid-
ers a National Register nomination which
is normally evaluated by professionals in
a specific discipline and that discipline is
not represented on the Board, the Board
will seek expertise in this area before
rendering a decision.
(6) The Board shall act in an advisory role to
other officials and depamnents of local
govemment regarding the identification
and protection of local historic and ar-
chaeological resources.
(7) The Board shall work toward the continu-
ing education of citizens regarding histor-
ic preservation and the community's
history.
(8) The Board will review all building permit
applications as well as all exterior archi-
tectural alterations and demolition within
the designated zone. The Board's respon-
sibility will be to provide it's recommen-
dation for approval, denial or modifica-
tion to the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion. The guidelines to be followed by
the Board will be designed to preserve
the character which typify development
in the zone and provide the basis for
preserving the historical character of the
zone. Applications must be accompanied
by a schematic drawing of proposed
changes within the zone.
(9) The Board shall develop a local historical
preservation plan that will be compatible
with the Alaska State Historic Preserva-
tion Plan and produce information that is
compatible with the Alaska Heritage
Resource Survey.
(d) Application: An application requiting review in
TSH Zomg District shall be filed with the
Planning Department~ The TSH zoning district,
as located within the bounds shown on the City
of Kenai Official Zoning Map. The application
shall contain:
(1) One reproducible copy of the application
signed by the applicant and, if leasing the
premises, co-signed by the owner indicat-
ing type or nature of business.
(2) Current color photographs of the site and
of any existing structures representing
both the overall condition of structures
251
14.20.105
(e)
and accurately portraying materials and
color.
(3) Reproducible schematic plans of the
proposed construction sufficient to show
building size and layout, exterior eleva-
tions, proposed materials and colors.
(4) A landscaping and site plan complying
with KMC 14.25 and the development
criteria of this chapter drown to scale
showing the existing structure and all
proposed alterations and additions in
relation to the site.
Development Criteria. The development criteria
is intended to provide for a district in which
residential and business enterprises cohabit-
habitat as a desirable and compatible use. All
proposed construction, renovation, demolition,
or alteration shall'
(1) Encourage, whenever possible and corn-
' · patible with historic character of the TSH
zone, foot traffic; restaurants, gift shops,
parks, etc.; indigenous Kenai Peninsula
rom; wooden structures including log
style with soft colored or natural sidings.
Discourage uses which will violate the
historic and scenic quality of the TSH
zone; buildings and building additions
that are not compatible with adjacent
buildings or which violate the existing
character and scale of the district.
Specific structures and activities which
will not be allowed, but are not limited
(2)
(3)
to:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Buildings with "modem design style
of architecture" that have no histori-
cal correlation with the district;
Multiple family residences (exclud-
ing duplexes);
Gas stations;
Auto repair shops;
Rental storage of any kind;
Kennels or similar uses;
Livestock, Stables, Commercial
horseback tiding;
Auto body and paint shops;
(f)
(g)
(4) Commercial buildings are limited to a
total area of no more 5,000 square feet
per story. Any individual unit within the
structure may be of no more than 2,500
square feet, except that the Commission
may allow a larger individual unit if it is
determined to be compatible with the
zone.
(5) Metal-sided buildings may be allowed if
the Commission determines they are
compatible with the zone.
Criteria for determining acceptable use shall
include, but not be limited to the following:
(1) All alterations to existing structures
should be performed so as to preserve the
historical and architectural character of
the TSH zoning district.
(2) The distinguishing original qualities or
character of a building, structure, or site
in its environment shall not be destroyed.
The removal or alteration of any historic
material or destruction of architectural
features cannot be done without approval.
(3) Changes which may have taken place in
the course of time are evidence of the
history and development of a building,
structure, or site, and its environment.
These changes may have acquired signifi-
cance of their own, which should be
recognized and respected.
(4) Landscaping requirements according to
City of Kenai as required by KMC 14.25.
(5) All exterior construction must be com-
pleted within a year of date of approval.
Existing structures: All structures existing prior
to the enactment of this ordinance will be ~-
lowed to continue in their present form and
use. In the event of loss of the existing struc-
ture due to demolition, fire or natural causes,
the slxucture may be rebuilt with the following
requirements:
(1) The structure to be rebuilt must conform
to the previously existing structure in
terms of size, shape and location unless
the Commission determines the new
252
14.20.105
structure is more compatible with the
intent of the TSH zone.
(2) The use of the new structure must be the
same as the use of the previous structure.
(3) Application for reconstruction of the
struCture must be made to the Planning
Department within one year of the date of
loss due to demolition or damage.
(4) Reconstruction of the structure must be
complete within two years of the date of
the loss due to demolition or damage.
(5) If applicant wants to rebuild, other than
a pre-existing structure, the existing struc-
ture provisions as stated above are not
applicable.
(h) Criteria for designation of landmarks to be
included in the TSH'
(1) Its age - approximately fifty years old.
(2) Its character, interest or value as part of
the development, heritage, or cultural
characteristics of the City of Kenai.
(3) Its location as the site of a significant
historic event.
(4) Its identification with a person or persons
who significantly contributed to the cul-
ture and development of the City of
Kenai.
(5) Its distinguishing characteristics of an
architectural type.
(6) Its relationship to other distinctive areas
that are eligible for preservation accord-
ing to a historical, cultural, or architectur-
al criteria.
(i) Uses.
(1)
(J)
Principal Permitted Uses as allowed in
Land Use Table.
(2) Conditional Uses: As allowed in the Land
Use Table and subject to the provision of
this chapter.
1. Such uses must be similar to princi-
pal uses permitted in the zone.
2. Such uses must be in harmony with
the intent of the zone.
Review process. Upon submittal of an applica-
tion, the Planning Department shall schedule
the application for review by the TSH Zoning
District Review Board at the following appro-
priate meeting. The Board shall make a recom-
mendation regarding the permit application to
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The
Board's recommendation shall be based upon
the development criteria in this section and all
other pertinent provisions of the Kenai Munici-
pal Code.
(k) Signs. Signs shall be as allowed as set forth in
KMC 14.20.220(f). (Ord. 1727-96)
(1) Penalties. Penalties for non-compliance with
this Chapter shall be as set forth by KMC
14.20.260.
(m) Definitions.
(1) Alteration-Any act or process that chang-
es one or more of the exterior architectur-
al features of a structure, including, but
not limited to, the erection, construction,
reconstruction, or removal of any struc-
ture which requires a building permit.
(2) Construction-The act of adding an addi-
tion to an existing structure or the erec-
tion of a new principal or accesso~,' struc-
ture on a lot or property which requires
a building permit.
(3) Demolition-Any act or process that de-
stroys in part or in whole a landmark or
a structure within a historic district.
(4) Certified Local Govemment-A local gov-
ernment "that has been certified to carry
out the purposes of section 101 (b) of the
National Historic Preservation Act." (Ord.
1637-95)
(5) Historic District-An area designated as a
"historic district" by ordinance of the City
Council, which contains within de£mable
geographic boundaries, one or more land-
mark and which may have within its
boundaries other properties or structures
that, while not of such historic and/or
architectural significance to be designated
as landmarks, nevertheless contribute to
the overall visual characteristics of the
253
14.20.105
landmark or landmarks located within the
historic district.
(6) Historic Preservation-The act of adopting
regulations and restrictions for the protec-
tion and preservation of places and areas
of historical and cultural importance to
the Kenai.
(7) Landmark-A property or structure desig-
nated as a "landmark" by ordinance of
the City Council, pursuant to procedures
prescribed herein, that is worthy of reha-
bilitation, restoration, and preservation
because of its historic and/or architectural
significance to the City of Kenai.
(8) New Development-Any development
which requires a building permit.
(9) Reconstruction-The action of returning a
structure to original state.
(10) Relocation-Any relocation of a structure
on its site or to another site.
(11) Renovation-To restore to a former better
state (as by repairing or rebuilding).
(12) Site plan-Schematic drawing complying
with the development criteria of this
chapter and drawn to scale showing pro-
posed structure in relation to the site.
(Ords. 1133, 1527-93, 1567-93)
14.20.110 Central Commercial Zone (CC
Zone).
(a) Intent. The CC Zone is established to provide
for an area of concentrated commercial devel-
opment. Regulations applying to this zone are
designed to encourage a compact group of
business of the type which are mutually benefi-
cial and located close enough together to en-
courage walk-in trade.
(b) Principal Permitted Uses: As allowed in Land
Use Table.
(c) Conditional Uses: As allowed in Land Use
Table and subject to the provisions of this
chapter.
(d) Accessory Uses: As defined (see Definitions).
(e) Home Occupations: Uses as allowed by this
chapter.
(f) Development Requirements:
(1) No stores or businesses shall involve any
kind of manufacture compounding, pro-
cessing, or treatment of products where
such operations are objectionable due to
odor, dust, smoke, noise, vibrations, or
other similar nuisances.
(2) Open Storage: No open storage shall be
located closer than 25 feet to the adjoin-
ing fight-of-way of any collector street or
main thoroughfare. Any open storage
visible from a collector street shall be
enclosed with an eight foot (8') high
fence of good appearance acceptable to
the Commission.
(3) Lot and yard requirements (see Develop-
ment Requirements Table- Additional
Requirements Section).
(4) Off-Street parking and loading require-
ments shall be required in this chapter.
(g) Parking Requirements: As required by this
chapter.
(Ord. 925)
14.20.120 General Commercial Zone (CG
Zone).
(a) Intent. The CG Zone is established to provide
for areas where a broad range of retail, whole-
sale, and service establishments is desirable.
Uses are regulated to concentrate commercial
development to the greatest extent possible and
to prevent any uses which would have an ad-
verse effect upon nearby properties. New single
and two-family residential uses and other non-
commercial uses, except as otherwise provided
in this chapter, are not permitted in this zone
as principal uses because it is intended that
land classified in this zone be reserved for
commercial purposes, and because a commer-
cial zone is not suited to the uses excluded
above.
(b) Principal Permitted Uses: As allowed in Land
Use Table.
254