HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-04-12 Planning & Zoning Minutes - Work SessionCITY OF KENAI
PLANNING 8c ZONING COMMISSION
KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
APRIL 12, 2000 - 7:00 P.M.
CHAIRMAN CARL CLICK PRESIDING
WORK SESSION
The Proposed Livestock Ordinance work session began at 7:17 p.m.
Members Present: Carl, Glick, Phil Bryson, Ron Goecke, Barb Nord, Arny Jackman
Members Absent: Donald Erwin, Don Gough
Others Present: Councilman Duane Bannock, Chief Animal Control Bill Godek,
City Attorney Cary Graves, Administrative Assistant Marilyn
Kebschull, Contract Secretary Barb Roper
Goecke, who introduced the proposed livestock ordinance again expressed his strong
desire to have an ordinance which the Commission could refer to when situations
arise involving livestock in certain zones anal lots under three acres within the City of
Kenai.
P8vZ Commissioners had the following comments regarding the proposed ordinance:
Jackman referenced the list of animals that should not be allowed within the
City and thought that bees should not be included, as they didn't appear to be
a problem to those individuals she knows who have bees. She noted, bees are
only kept for a short period during the year. Jackman also felt the lot size
should be limited to 1.5 or 2 acres.
Nord also referenced the list and thought that pigeons should be allowed, as
they are not a detriment. With regard to lot size, Nord didn't think the lot
should be less than 20,000 sq. ft.
Bryson explained the handout provided prior to the work session (which he
prepared). He noted, the spreadsheet listed various subdivisions with the total
lots less than 14,000 and 20,000 sq. ft. The spreadsheet was discussed in
detail.
Bryson referred to the draft ordinance included in the packet with options
listed. With regard to Option 1, Bryson indicated he was receptive to 20,000 sq.
ft or greater. In Option 2, Option. 2.1 to 18,000 sq. ft. This could increase with
the number of living units on the parcel. Bryson didn't think livestock should
be allowed in the RU, RS1, RS2, and TSH zones. On page two of the draft
ordinance, Item (d)(2), Bryson stated he would like RU inserted in the blank to
indicate the zone. ~rther, Bryson would like the permit not to exceed two
years (Option 1.2). In regard to Item (d)(3) regarding variances, Bryson
explained situations where variances may be necessary. Bryson thought Item
(e) was reasonable and in ltem (~ Option 1, 25' was appropriate on the side yard
setback, 50' from the front and 10' from the back. This should also include 54'
from the adjacent residences.
Bryson pointed out the ordinance did not address pets that may fall on the list
of livestock (referring to the list of animals not allowed). With regard to the list,
Bryson looked at it with size of animal, odor, noise and safety. Bryson thought
buffalo should be changed to bison; Items 11 and 12 should not be on the list;
and Items 17, 18 and 23 should also be removed.
Bryson indicated he was not in support of the ordinance but would try to
suggest something workable.
• Godek thought that if there was going to be a livestock ordinance, individuals
living in rural residential areas could have what they want within reason as
they were living in a RR zone for the purpose of having animals. Godek
indicated he added the rare birds as they were becoming more and more
popular and could be dangerous if let loose. Godek indicated there is a rather
large pigeon population in Kenai and that cats are a constant complaint at the
animal shelter. Godek thought that Bryson's recommendations were very
reasonable. Godek provided Commissioners with a list of properties with large
animals.
~ • Graves indicated the list of animals was developed in a brainstorm session and
the list could be changed. Graves addressed Option (d)(1), the circus option
and asked if anyone had a problem with it. Discussion took place and it was
recommended that RSI, RS2, RU and TSH zones be listed. This would leave
the RR and commercial zones available.
• Kebschull echoed Bryson and Godek's comments regarding lot sizes
After individual comments were made, a lengthy discussion ensued. It was decided
that on Attachment A, the list of animals not allowed, Iterx~ 3 would be changed to
Bison; and Items l7 and 23 would be removed. Rabbits and ducks would remain for
now and a public hearing would be scheduled.
Prior to closing the work session, Graves requested anyone with ideas or input for the
sign code re-write to contact him and noted, the sign code needed to be addressed as
variances for signs had become the rule and not the exception.
Graves congratulated Kebschull on the grant for economic development. The City had
received very positive comments regarding the grant application.
Work session ended at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara L. Roper, C n act Secretary