Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-01-22 P&Z SummaryKENAI PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 22, 1975 7:00 P.M „ CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE RON MALSTON, CHAIRMAN ITEM l: ROLL CALL ITEM 2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES, JANUARY 13, 1975 ITEM 3: OLD BUSINESS a. b. c. ITEM 4: NEW BUSINESS a. State Lana Selection b. c. ITEM 5: ADJOURN KENAI PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETTNG, JANUARY 22, 1:975 7:00 P.M., CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE RON MALSTON, CHAIRMAN ITEM 1: ROLL CALL Members Present: Ron Malston, Jon Nelson, Nels Kjelsta , Beverly Fillio, Cliff Heus, Harry Gaines Ex-Officio Member Present: Councilman Edward Ambarian Also Present: Mr. Roland Lynn, Mr. Phil Aber ITEM 2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES, JANUARY 13, 1975 Under Item 1, the following adjustments were made: It is to be noted that Councilman Ambarian is an Ex-Officio member of the Planning ~ Zoning Commission. Also, change Mr. to Mayor James Elson. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 13, 1975, were approved as corrected. ITEM 3: OLD BUSINESS There was no Old Business. ITEM 4: NEW BUSINESS a. State Land Selection Mr, Lynn advised the Commission that he had received a letter from the Department of Natural Resources stating that there was 137.20 acres of selectable lands with- in the corporate boundaries of the City of Kenai, and the law permits the City to choose 10% or 13.7 acres of this selection. Mr. Lynn asked that the Commission recommend a choice of selection of the lands so that he could report it to the City Council at their Special Meeting of January 23, 1975. - 2 - Jon Nelson moved that the Commission recommend to City Council a first choice selection of ADL lot nbrs, 32, 34, anal 35 (evaluation of $41,400 - 14.59 acres) of Section 26, T6N, R12W, SM and a second choice selection of ADL lot nbrs, 30, 31, 32, and 33 (evaluation of $36,300 - 13.47 acres) of Section 26, T6N, R12W, SM, The reason being for these two selections is that the property lends itself to potential development and is adjacent to an area which has been re-zoned to Light Industrial and that both land .selections have access to the beach, The third choice recommended by the Commission would be~ADL lot nbrs. 46 and 47 (evaluation of $45,700- - 13.52 acres) of Section 26, T6N, R12W, SM. This. choice of property is merely speculative ,and for possible residential development, The Motion was seconded by Nels Kjelstad, Motion passed unanimously by the Commission. ITEM 5: ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. __ ue . Peter, Secretary s cp 1/23/75