HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-10-28 P&Z Minutes/(
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
Kenai City Hall, 7 p.m.
Philip Bryson, Presiding Chairman
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. AGENDA APPROVAL
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF October 14, 1981
5. OLD BUSINESS
A. Lease Application: F.B.O. Subdivision Lots 1, 2, and 3
Donald and Karen Creamer
6. tJEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Capitol Improvements Program
B. Discussion of Open Gravel Pits
*
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. City Council Report: Betty Glick
B. Borough Planning Report: Betty Glick
C. City Administration Report: Bill Brighton
8. COMP4ISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
9. ADJOURNMENT
* Add speakers: Robert Jackson, Father Targonsky, and Ed Garnett
,~
Keani Planning and Zoning Commission
~~ Regular Meeting, October 28, 19$1
Kenai City Hall, 7 p.m.
Philip Bryson, Presiding Chairman
1. ROLL CALL
ice..-~" ~.~.~
lV`_ ~
Present: Phil Bryson, Jack Castimore, Jim Blanning,
Paul Turner, Wayne Regelin, and Ex-Officio
Member Betty Glick
Absent: Mary Quesnel, Jerry Andrews
Others: Ed Garnett, Bob Jackson, and Father Targonsky
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
3. AGENDA APPROVAL
Three persons have asked to be heard at the meeting and
will be added under New Business. They are: Ed Garnett
Bob Jackson, and Father Targonsky
MOTION:
~ Jim Blanning moved, seconded by Paul Turner to accept the
agenda with the above changes.
Motion passed unanimously.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of October 14, 1981
Phil Bryson called attention to changes in page one, page
two and page four.
MOTION:
Wayne Regelin moved, seconded by Paul Turner to accept the
minutes with the appropriate changes.
Motion passed unanimously
5. OLD BUSINESS
A. Lease Application: F.B.O. Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, and 3,
Donald and Karen Creamer
Jim Swalley informed the Commission that an attempt had been
made to contact the Creamers with no success as they appear
to have left town. They are aware of the time limitation
Kenai Planning and Zoning. Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
6.
on their application.
Page 2
Phil Bryson retained this as a re-occuring item of Old
Business until the time period has elapse.
Jim Swalley outlined the problems with the application as
to the original date of application. The application
should expire on either November 14th or December 17th.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Capital Improvements Program
Phil Bryson introduced the list of items drawn up by the
City as well as some projects left over from last year.
The Commission was asked for input on this list.
Bill Brighton pointed out that this was a priority list
that went to Juneau last year and there was enough money
granted at that time to accomplish all items on the front
page. This is referring to page three of the gold book,
'Capital Improvements Project'. The Council has expressed
their intention for any new or additional monies for
capital improvements to follow through on the list as it
appears in the book. There has not been a work session
on it as yet as to whether or not to take action, however,
the intent at this point is to follow through on the list.
Wayne Regelin asked about the library expansion. Bill
Brighton informed him that there is a special appropriation
for that item as was done at the ]_ast session for the
airport and senior citizens projects.
Keith Kornelis informed the Commission that the first page
is taken directly from the gold book, and the items following
are not in order of priority.
Phil Bryson reminded those present that it is the respon-
sibility of the Planning Commission to recommend public
works projects, but it does not have to be done at this
meeting. Time will be needed by the Commission members
and will be an item that the Commission will want to
study and return to the Council.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3
Regular Meeting, October 2$, 1981
Bill Brighton stated that he is going to request that
the Council have a work session before the next meeting
which would give the Commission time to put something
together.
Phil Bryson reminded the members that the next meeting
will fall on a holiday and the next one close to a holiday
and a question was raised as to when the next meeting
would be held. The question was left open at this time.
B. Discussion of Open Gravel Pits
Bill Brighton explained that the reason the item is on
.the agenda is that over the past three or four weeks,
there have been several alleged zoning violations which
have been looked into. Several letters went out, including
those concerning gravel pits, to those who were in
violation including the City of Kenai. Several persons
were invited to Mr. Brighton's office to discuss the
issue which outlined the code dealing with extraction
of natural resources and this meant that gravel pits
could not operate without a conditional use permit.
The City of Kenai has been asked to stop extraction until
such time as the permits have been acquired, along with
~ those. individuals involved. Only under an emergency
situation such as ice and snow which endangers the health
or welfare of the citizens will sand or gravel be
extracted by the City.
Wayne Regelin asked about the grandfather rights concerning
the gravel pits. Bill Brighton answered that there are
no grandfather rights in this context. Under the code,
it is stated that a pit can remain,. but it cannot be
enlarged, or changed in any way without the conditional
use permit.
Paul Turner stated that he was glad to see the City take
this stand and is following through.
Phil Bryson asked that the situation be corrected as soon
as possible. Bill Brighton informed Mr. Bryson that the
City is already in the process of correcting the situation.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
The question was asked, when was the need for
use permit first established. Bill Brighton
the code and answered that to the best of his
it would have been in 1975.
Page 4
a conditional
researched
knowledge,
Ruby Coyle responded that prior to 1975 there was a section
of the code that related to conditional use permits for
gravel pits. A conditional use permit was obtained in
1973 by the Coyles under that section of the code that
existed then.
C. Persons Present not Scheduled to be Heard
1. Bob Jackson spoke on his own behalf regarding a letter
he had received from City Manager, Bill Brighton
informing him that he was in violation of the city
code pertaining to operating a business within the
rural residential zone. Mr. Jackson .stated that
the only way he could operate his business would
be to move to another location and that .would not be
feasible at this time. He stated that he looked
to the Commission for guidance in his situation.
Phil Bryson asked if Mr. Jackson has requested a
conditional use permit. Mr. Jackson stated that
he had not. Mr. Jackson felt that perhaps the
answer would be a variance.
Bill Brighton informed the Commission that he made an
error in the letter to Mr. Jackson. He had called
this a rural residential area, when in fact it is
suburban residential. In either case it is still
a nonconforming use. Bill Brighton gave Mr. Jackson
three alternatives as outlined in the code, one being
a variance, a conditional use permit, or a change in
the code as it now reads.
Phil Bryson asked Ben Delahay, City Attorney what
alternatives lay open to Mr. Jackson. Ben Delahay
informed the Commission that a variance or even a
conditional use permit would not apply in this
case. The only alternative he could see would be
obtaining property elsewhere for his business.
Mr. Jackson restated that this is not feasible at
this time.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
Page 5
Bill Brighton read the code regarding the qualifications
for a variance and conditional use permit for Mr.
Jackson.
Jack Castimore outlined the cost involved in applying
fora variance for Mr. Jackson, bringing up the
participation of the property owners surrounding his
business as to whether or not these neighbors would
want that type of business in that zone.
Mr. Jackson felt-`that the neighbors had not objected
in the past and probably would not now. Also, there
had been no damage since he had the business, if any-
thing he had improved the property.
Phil Bryson informed Mr. Jackson that what he would
have to do is to convince the Commission that he can
meet the three conditions outlined in the code.
2. Father Targonsky read the letter he had received from
Bill Brighton regarding removal of a mobil home parked
next to the Russian Church which violates the code of
the City of Kenai.. Father Targonsky informed the
Commission that the mobil home was used as storage
at the construction site for building materials needed
for the restoration of the church and. rectory and in
this sense it is legal under the code. He went on
to say that the restoration work had begun in 1976
with a grant being received in 1977 from the Park Service
based on the fact that the Russian Church had been
named a national historical landmark in 1970. The
work is being done on both the church and rectory while
the family is living in the rectory as time and money
permit. Father Targonsky related that last summer
the City saved alot of time and money by going
through his property with water and sewer and asked
that this be taken into consideration especially
since this construction prevented the restoration
work to continue. A special extention on the time of
completion was granted by the park service so the
completion of phase three and four yet remaining are
behind.
Bill Brighton communicated to the Commission that he
had related to Father Targonsky that he is under an
obligation to move the trailer within a reasonable
time.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
Phil Bryson asked Bill Brighton if there was written
permission to put the trailer at the site. Bill
Brighton stated that as far as he was aware, there
was none, however, under existing circumstances that
trailer could be there five years from now depending
on money, funds, and length of working time.
Father Targonsky pointed out that the code does not
state a definite time limit on construction.
Ben Delahay informed the Commission that the code,
21.76.180 relating to mobile homes confirms the use
of one on a construction site and that it must be
removed upon the completion of the construction, but
it does. not give a time line, leaving the door wide
open for a trailer to remain forever.
Paul Turner asked .Father Targonsky if any construction
was occuring now. Father Targonsky stated that
construction does not go on during winter. Paul Turner
then asked when the last time construction occurred,
the answer was "last summer, during the months of
August and September" with no construction going
on this year due to the City putting in the water and
sewer lines.
Phil Bryson asked if a building permit was being held
for this work. Father Targonsky stated that he felt
one was not needed .since this was restoration not
construction and since the money was a grant he did
not know.
Wayne Regelin asked if the trailer could be parked
somewhere else where it would be legal and stated
that he would help move it if a place could be found,
perhaps a parishoner living outside the city limits
would be willing to park it.
Phil Bryson stated that he didn't feel that there
was an issue before the Commission in that the trailer
is legal under a construction situation.
Paul Turner felt that the definition of construction
should be considered in that the point is legitimate
construction could go on for years, and also to
consider is the fact that construction is not going
on at the present time and won't be until next year.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28,.1981
Page 7
Ben Delahay read the code pertaining to trailers
for residential use and where it is permitted, however,
it is for residential use and not a help in this
circumstance. With reference to Father Targonsky's
statement that he did not need a building permit,
Ben suggested that he check with the building department
in that, even though it is a restoration a permit
is still needed. A grant does not change the need
for one, nor is it the responsibility of the grantor.
Phil Bryson asked the Commission for input/direction.
Jim Blanning brought forth the need for a change
in the code putting a time limitation on construction,
however, that would not help the immediate situation.
Phil Brying asked if a building permit had a time
limit. No one present knew for sure. Ben Delahay
stated that the permits taken out in the past were
usually of a duration of two years on the bigger
construction. This included the airport project as
and example. Ben Delahay agreed that a time limit
would have to be written in.
Wayne Regelin suggested a resolution to go before
the City Council supporting the City Manager in this
matter and that the trailer should be moved within
a reasonable time. The Commission discussed what a
reasonable time would be.
Ruby Coyle asked to speak on behalf of the church
and Father Targonsky stating that since it was an
old historic structure the work on it should not be
hindered.
MOTION:
Wayne Regelin made the motion to make up a resolution
to go before the Council stating a time line on construction.
Motion died for lack of a second.
MOTION:
Paul Turner made the
allow the trailer to
permit which would be
at the site.
motion, seconded by Jim Blanning to
remain as long as there is a building
evidence of on-going construction
Motion passed.
i Wayne Regelin discussed the need for uniform enforcement
of codes in future. Each case has it's exceptions, this
one being a good example.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission Page $
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
3. Ed Garnett spoke on behalf of Carl Haller .who also
received a letter from the City Manager. Mr. Garnett
related that Mr. Haller has been in the same area
and in the same business since 1959, before the
ordinance came into effect in 1975. Mr. Garnett read
the letter and ordinances pertaining to Mr. Haller's
case and. commented that this is a nonconforming
use and expressed concern over the idea of a-man
having to go out of business if he cannot conform
to the code. Mr. Garnett quoted the costs involved
in meeting the requirements as outlined in the code,
which appeared to be prohibitive in Mr. Haller's
case. Mr. Garnett related that he would like this
case to be settled on the basis of nonconforming use
no matter what business the man is in. Somebody
is going to have to make a decision on the matter as
there are three ordinances, all of which are contra-
dictory. Either use the intent as expressly put
in there or the actual statement that if you're there
and you're lawful you can continue. Mr. Garnett
requested that before going any further, look to
see whether or not each case is viable and then go
from there.
Phil Bryson asked if attorney Delahay was going to be
evaluating this issue, Mr. Delahay answered that
he was.
Betty Glick informed the Commission that Mr. Haller's
property has come up from time to time under complaints
on the Council level, twice that she knew of, once
in conjunction with other properties. Perhaps a
public hearing should be held to take action to try
to clean this up. When considering enforcement of the
pertinent ordinances it must be taken into consid-
eration that to enforce one, all following it must
be enforced on the same basis.
Phil Bryson pointed out that these three persons who
had requested to speak were doing so on an adminis-
trative matter and it just so happened that the
Commission acted on one but there was no need to act
on the other two.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
Page 9
It should be noted that an appeal process on
administrative matters should be taken to the
Council, who would then convene as an appeal
board.
Mr. Garnett wanted to clarify that he was not asking
for an appeal but rather to bring to the attention
of the Commission the faults of the code so that
should they find the same conclusions steps can
be taken to correct it.
Ruby Coyle stated that her understanding was that
the Borough had control of planning and zoning and
the only thing turned over to the City was conditional
use permits and variances. Following then, is it
the duty of the administration to enforce the
variances -and permits and the appeals board is for
the whole ordinance.
Bill Brighton .read the ordinance pertinent to her
question, 21.76.200, stating that the City Manager
is the administrative official. of the Kenai Peninsula
Borough thus enforcing the entire code.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. City Council Report: Betty Glick
The City Council approved an ordinance accepting and
appropriating $600,000 for equipment and fencing for the
airport.
An ordinance which was up for adoption was tabled which
would provide funds to start a study of drainage, however,
it was learned that the soil conservation service will do
the study for little or no fee.
A resolution was passed approving the purchase. of a dump
truck for the City.
Another resolution was for the transfer of funds for
relocating cables in the F.B.O. Subdivision.
A request was received by a Mr. Wells to vacate a portion
of Birch and Spur highway. The Council is not proceeding
on this as Birch Street is due for upgrading.
Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission Page 10
-~ Regular Meeting, October 28, 1981
B. Borough Planning Report: Betty Glick
There was not a quorum present for a formal meeting.
The vacation of Lake Street came before the Borough who
were in concurrence with the Commission. and the vacation
was denied.
C. Administrative Re ort: Bill Brighton
None
8. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
None
9. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Paul Turner made the motion, seconded by Wayne Regelin
to adjourn the meeting.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
~ at 8:50 p.m.
The next meeting set for November 11, being a holiday,
will be tentatively cancelled as there is no item for the
agenda at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~%~~~
Janet Loper
Secretary to the Commission
w
0
z
H
E "~
W
W
~-,
z
0
o~
U
c.7
H
C
N
Q
z
z
H
z
z
Q
a
a
~~
~r
o R
cx ~
~ ~
~
o
~
~
pa
,--,
.~
a r-i
a~
~
~
o
~
d
~,
~ ~
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
ro
ti ?
~
~.
-d
~
¢
~
~
o
h b0
~
. ~
~
~
~
.-~
c~
•~
h
~~