Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-01-27 P&Z MinutesC ~.~.~jK~-~~ .-~~~e' cx KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 Kenai City Hall Philip Bryson, Chairman AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Alaska ' 84 ~! ~~ t~< ~~ . _ ~°~~'~ r?~'~ ,~~ ~. ,ti.~_F~: 3. AGENDA APPROVAL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 13, 1982 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Lease Application: R & P Enterprises Lots 1, 2, and 3 of FBO Subdivision 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Request for lease modification from Chris Sto.ehner/Arctic Aviation 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. City Council Report: Betty Glick B. Borough Planning Report: Betty Glick C. City Administration Report: Bill Brighton 8. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 9. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT ~h ~ ~~~~, KENAI PLANNIN G AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 Philip Bryson, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL Present: Phil Bryson, Jack Castimore, Lee Lewis, Mary Quesnel, Paul Betty Glick. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Alaska 1984 Jim Blanning, Wayne Regelin, Turner, and Ex-Officio Member A Council resolution No. 8.1-13 requested the Planning and Zoning Commission review and make recommendations concerning the observance of the year. Chairman Bryson opened the meeting to the public for comment. Hearing none, the issue was brought back to the Commission, with Mayor O'Reilly making the opening comments. Mayor O'Reilly informed the Commission that a representative from the Alaska '84 Committee had appeared before the Council which resulted in the resolution. $2,000 has been appropriated to Kenai and a deadline has been set for March 1 for a plan to be presented to the State legislature and in order to meet that time line, the community will have their plans ready by February 16th. The Council and Mayor are asking the Commission to consider the matter and determine if the plans should go ahead and if so, what direction the plans should take. Jim Blanning asked if any input had come from the Citizens, Mr. O'Reilly answered that there was no has been received has ranged from thinking Alaska to "the Alaska '84 Committe is not approaching it too much money is being spent". Chamber or Senior t. What input that '84 is a good idea in the right way, Betty Glick commented on celebrations in the past including an idea of a pageant or exposition depicting past history. Wayne Regelin suggested tieing it in with Fourth of July celebration in the summer and staying divorced from Alaska '84, doubting that money .will really be forthcoming from Juneau. Jack Castimore used Sitka as an example of celebrations where that City had a summer art festival with local artists displaying their works, music, Russian dancers, and tours of local interests. Kenai could have much the same thing with tours of. the oil industries, and using Kenai's own youngsters as guides, have places such as the Russian church set up their own displays depicting Kenai's past, with each place on the route including their own pictures or items of interest utilizing videos acquired from such places as the college or high school. KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 Page 2 Paul Turner expressed the opinion that all mentioned were good ideas, and that a task force would be necessary to implement any further objectives, however, pointed out that he was opposed to spending an amount such. as four million when that amount could well be used in different, much needed areas. The entire Mental Health budget for a year is four million. However, if Kenai doesn't use the money, Anchorage will. MOTION: Wayne Regelin moved, seconded by Paul Turner to table the issue of Alaska '84 until later in the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. 4. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION: Moved by Paul Turner, seconded by Jack Castimore to approve the agenda without correction or change. Motion passed unanimously. 5. APPROVAL•OF MINUTES of January 13, 1982. Phil Bryson asked that on page 3 under reconsideration of Swires Subdivision, the vote be shown and on page 3 paragraph 4, the word 'water' be deleted to clarify the intent of the statement. MOTION: Paul Turner moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to approve the minutes with the corrections and changes. Motion passed unanimously. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Lease. Application: .R & P Enterprises, Lots 1, 2, and 3 of FBO Subdivision Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts had been asked by the Commission at the last meeting to draw up a written plan that would outline the phases and dates of expected completion, these were submitted in writing to the Commission. KENAI PLANNING AND .ZONING COMMISSION Page 3 Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts explained their .written proposal and asked for questions/input. Mr. Swalley, airport manager did not have any comments other than the application with the additions met. with his approval. The Commission asked Mr. Pitts and Mr. Roth if the financing still appeared to be available; the answer was yes. Mr. Turner asked if they were planning to haul freight also, the answer was yes, they had their own planes for this. Mr. Bryson and Mr. Turner voiced their concern regarding landscaping and since there was supposed to be chain link fencing up, it was decided between the Commission and Mr. Roth and Mr. Pitts that trees would be left along the.Willow frontage outside the fence. MOTION: Wayne Regelin moved, seconded by Paul Turner to approve the lease agreement to R & P Enterprises, FBO Subdivision, lots 1, 2, and 3 and that the development plan be made part of the lease agreement and that by May 1982, tree removal and site preparation must be significantly underway, completed by October 1982. Motion passed unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Request for lease modificationfrom Chris Stoehner/Arctic Aviation John Stoehner of Arctic Aviation appeared before the Commission on behalf of Chris Stoehner. Mr. Bryson asked Mr. Stoehner to briefly explain to the Commission what his application entailed, which is the combination of clam processing and machine repair and overhaul service. Commissioners asked Mr. Stoehner if any provisions have been made regarding the clam processing, he answered that traps had been proposed for the sewer lines and that 6,000 gallons of water during an 8 hour period would be flowing through the lines. Phil Bryson asked Mr. Stoehner how many people were employed in the processing business. Mr. Stoehner answered that there were over 200 with 50 being located at the cannery. Jim Blanning asked if the FBO lots were restricted to aircraft use only, if they were not FAA controlled, Jim Swalley answered that they were. Mr. Stoehner pointed out that transporting the clams would be done by KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 Page 4 airplane, specifically Arctic Aviation planes and later by other airlines. Phil Bryson asked Mr. LaShot, City. Engineer for input on the issue. Mr. LaShot felt that the new sewer system is not geared for any type of processing facility and went on to state that he had talked to Chris Stoehner who stated she was looking into getting some documentation that would prove it not harmful, however, Mr. LaShot had talked with a representative from D.E.C. who said if properly screened and maintained it may not be too much of a problem and felt that more research needed to be done on it. Wayne Regelin asked Attorney Delahay for his opinion, asking specifically if this operation would be illegal. Mr. Delahay answered that he didn't believe it was, however, stated that there were a number of reasons why he could not recommend it, 1) it is not an airport related activity, the fact that the clams are transported in and out is not a controlling factor, 2) the machine shop since it would be working on airplane engines would be airport related and should be encouraged if in fact, it is not available in Alaska, and the. Commission must closely look at .the fact that it would be antagonistic towards the FAA and the Council who have tried to hold the properties on the airport for airport facilities only, and 3) the attorney's office has found Arctic Aviation to be uncooperative, unresponsive, and irresponsible in the conduct of two of the leases they currently have, and went on to explain the details. Jim Blanning stated that his feelings were that with the FBO restrictions P'~would conclu e approval of the clam processing plant and in .addition to the apparent unresolved problems with the City he would have problems approving the application. MOTION: Wayne Regelin moved to approve the lease modification application of Arctic Aviation for a clam processing and machine shop facility, seconded by Paul Turner. Phil Bryson asked that"some consideration be given to a motion not allowing the clam processing but allowing the engine overhaul shop". Wayne Regelin stated that he would look favorably on an engine overhaul shop once an agreement was made with the City. Jack Castimore also went along with this. John Stoehner stated that the viable business would be more the clam processing than the machine shop and should the clam processing proposal fails, then he would have to withdraw his petition. VOTE: Motion failed by unanimous roll call vote KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 5 Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 MOTION: Jim Blanning moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to remove Alaska '84 from the previous tabled motion and bring it back before the Commission. Motion passed unan_.mously. Paul Turner introduced Resolution No. PZ82-1 which recommends participation in the celebration and requests. the Mayor appoint a task force for planning. MOTION: Paul Turner moved to adopt Resolution PZ82-l, seconded by Jim Blanning MOTION Amendment: Wayne Regelin moved to strike item C from the resolution. Motion failed for lack of second Phil Bryson asked to go on record as saying "I feel the City is being thrown crumbs to get general support throughout the State and though I do not approve of the concept either, I also don't approve of their per capita percentage of the project proposed for planning in the area". VOTE on original motion: Motion passed with Commissioners Quesnel, Castimore, Lewis, Blanning and Turner voting yes; Commissioners Bryson and Regelin voting no. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. City Council Report: Betty Glick. The City Council passed.a resolution which awarded a contract to complete a topo project. Carmen Gintoli submitted a redesign or update on the airport schematic The .Council passed motion. to purchase back the leases from Bob Roper, on recommendation .from the Harbor Commission, and Mr. Roper accepted the offer. KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 6 Regular Meeting, January 27, 1982 B. Borough Planning Report: Betty Glick For information, a presentation was made by David Stevens from Alaska Division of Parks on Kenai River Master Plan. Swires Subdivision rezoning was approved. ,~ y s ~ Kes~irz~~ section 21.01.010 paragraph B had been recommended for deletion by the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Sam Best felt that it would be best to leave that wording as stated due to his interpretation being if the Borough-was proposing to site a new school and they had chosen an area that did not allow schools then the Borough would have- to petition the cities to rezone and go through the process. Added: "subject to review .and recommendations by the affected munici- pality and be consistent with land use." C. City Administration Report: Bill Brighton The Borough was granted a five year extension for their land fill project in section 36 and at the direction of the Council the City has protested that extension and asked for consideration from the Department of Environmental Conservation. 8. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 9. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Wayne Regelin asked if The Russian Church had obtained their building permit and. if there had been any followup on the letters Mr. Brighton had sent out. Mr. Brighton stated that he had not as yet, however, there would probably be court action pending. A report will be made at the next meeting. Wayne Regelin asked if the lease for Kenai Air has terminated or what was happening on it. Bill Brighton stated that they had set February as the date for a meeting on the lease. A report will be made at the next meeting. Paul Turner offered his support of the City protesting the dump site extension and if there are issues the Commission could give support on or lack of support to, the Commission would like to know. Mr. Brighton expressed the desire to hold off on any action until receipt of a response KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Page 7 Regular Meeting, .January 27, 1982 Dr. Turner also wished to voice his support of the enforcement the City Administration has taken and the effort taken to clean up the City. And the third comment would be to ask for input at the next meeting on what is happening with the non-airport related businesses along Willow Street as pointed out by Jim Swalley. Mrs. Glick, and Mr. Brighton pointed out that these lands were leased at a time when the City needed money and when the original leases were extended, the intent was to be airport related, however, was not enforced. Jack LaShot asked the Commission to review plans drawn up related to the lands surrounding the Senior Citizens Center as requested by the FAA. Chairman Bryson stated that it would be done after the meeting. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the next meeting will be February 10, 1982. Dr. Turner moved, seconded by Jack Castimore to adjourned. ~ Motion passed unanimously. r Respectfully submitted, net Loper, cretary VERBATIM TRANSLATION Meeting of January 27, 1982 6. NEW BUSINESS Page 1 A. Request for lease modification from Chris Stoehner/Arctic Aviation Phil Bryson - the next item for business is a request of a lease modification from Chris Stoehner Arctic Aviation. Chris and John Stoehner, John is here to represent Arctic Aviation. John would you could you go through your project generally first. John Stoehner - Mr. Chairman, members of the Planing and Zoning Commission. Arctic Aviation is proposed or has asked for an amendment to its lease on lot 1 block 3 of the general aviation apron. This, lease property has been used ever since its development for strictly a tie down for small general aviation aircraft. We're requesting the change of this to allow a building to be put on this peice of property and to be utilized by two leasees one of them being my wife Chris Stoehner with Northern Lights its a company by the name of Northern Lights Fisheries. Northern Lights Fisheries has been in existance for about 4 years and clam processing sounds kind of yukky but ah, its been a viable business now for four years and what we're trying to do on that is to draw her in to a closer proximity with the rest of our enterprises here with Arctic Aviation and Arctic Fuel Services and our other holdings and interest that we have going. For the past years she has had to lease facilities from various other canneries namely Doris Lashly from Sea Catch, Rolland Schwanke with Seafoods of Alaska they`re out in Sterling. This created last summer quite a few problems for us, she has some technical equipment that she uses in her processing plant which I am probably the firemost world authority in the state of Alaska on this equipment I have been out there numerous times to have to repair it, it seems to pick the wrong times to break down and unfortunately the height of her business also happens to be the height of Arctic Aviation's business and namely during the fish haul season so it draws me away from the business of Arctic Aviation and the fueling facilities which I am having to control and monitor here at the Kenai Peninsula Airport and drive to where ever she is doing her business which last year was Sterling which involves an hours' drive just to get out there and back to the airport plus my time involved in working with her problems. So what we're trying to do here is to centrally locate our concerns, also the other half of the building we are proposing at this time ah, myself and my Kent Holland utilizing the additional space in this building for establishing a machine shop. Now the world is flooded with machine shops but this particular machine shop will be a specialty, it will meet a requirement that is not fulfilled inside the state of Alaska at this time it's a machine shop that will be able to chrome cyllinders we're talking aircraft cyllinders bore these cyllinders, weld-the cyllinder heads, ah remove and replace valve gu, ah valve seats and weld crank cases, line bore these cases after they`ve been VERBATIM TRANSLATION Meeting of January 27, 1982 Page 2 welded (inaudible). At the present time any of this work has to be sent stateside. This not only creates a delay factor for the consumer it also creates a increase cost in having to ship these parts outside. I would say roughly the cost of sending a cyllinder a single cyllinder out ah, to a repair station outside the state of Alaska at this time to be roughly one hundred dollars, fifty dollars each way air freight. And if I specify air freight because these components on an airplane represent down time for an airplane. The airplane is down it`s of no value to its operator and owner. So, ah, what we are proposing here is a machine shop that is capable of doing this work inside the state of Alaska resulting in a, a benefit to roughly all the operators and aircraft owners in the state. Ah, I'm sorry I didn't get this paper work in to you in time so you would probably take it home and read over what we have proposed, ah, I tried to answer as many questions that I could think of at the time with ah, with my, ah, written synopsis of the proposed operation. Phil Bryson - do you have more than one lease lot leased right now. John Stoehner - yes, we have three ah, three lots that are leased on the airport Phil Bryson - which ~ John Stoehner - they're all ajacent to each other Phil Bryson - lots 1 and 2 of block 1 and block, lot 1 of block 3. John Stoehner - yes Phil Bryson - and your proposing a facility on lot 1 block 3 John Stoehner - that's correct Phil Bryson - and there are no buildings presently on John Stoehner - there are no buildings on that lot. Now this lot does not, I might add, this lot does not adjoin the taxi way and it is a back lot with ah, this access gained from Beaver Loop. And so the lot, the building will be situated such ah, I'm sorry I don't believe when the, drawings gave out there I showed that (inaudible) Several people talking, presumable describing the drawing John Stoehner - (beginning of tape, part of sentence missing) ah, main line of sewer will be taken this spring. We hope to tie into the water and sewer with this facility also with this facility at the time (inaudible) that will preclude us digging up some pavement after they've got it paved and everything else if we can do this on a timely basis. Lee Lewis - you mentioned the fact that you process the ah, you know processing the clams requires some specific obligations I guess on the sewer VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 3 Meeting of January 27, 1982 John Stoehner - oh, ok, on on my ah, synopsis there I did indicate .that we would be using roughly six thousand gallons during an eight hour period of processing. Ok, we will install sand traps it will be a sand trap and a influent trap prior to the ah, sewage going into the sewer line. Yes, now. this will be a pump out. trap. Now we've used this ah, with ah, out at ah, the Brinkly plant we had last summer, ah that we leased from Rollin Schwanke. We just, we had to pour a slab with a sunken trap then the water would flow across the top, sands influence and stuff would settle out into it and then we could pump this out or bail it out and ah, we had no problems with the sewer, and there we were using a regular septic system. So we had no problems with the septic system, that we had out there by using this ah, this trap. Wayne Regelin - this trap collect not only the sand and the shells but tha soft tissue of the clam John Stoehner - soft tissue that would be suspended in the water no. They they wouldn't be heavy enough to say flow out but there would be very little of that ah, the way that they are processed the women are working the people that are doing the cleaning are using the bowls and they're cleaning right into a bowl. This bowl is then dumped into a different container and then the container is taken out and dumped separately. I This isn't dumped into the sewer system at all. Phil Bryson - how many employees do you anticipate John Stoehner - at one point last summer, my wife had. over 200 employees. This is including the people across the inlet that are doing the ah, digging for the clams and people that she had hired for the cannery. Phil Bryson - I'm more interested just the ah, ah, the cleaning operation at the airport John Stoehner - ah, I would say roughly fifty. Fifty employees, it would be on this side rather Jim Blanning - arn't the FBO lots arn't they restricted to aircraft use, ah, I thought, are those the lots that the FAA has put the restriction on Jim Swalley - my understanding is they are restricted to aeronautical activities Jim Blanning - where does that leave us, does that preclude a clam processing plant John Stoehner - the other thing that I forgot to mention in, is all of this product is flown. It's brought in across the inlet by aircraft and once its processed that is going for human consumption it is flown out and this has, its ah, amounted to quite a bit of money just for the transportation services of this product, not only for Arctic Aviation who is the primary VERBATIM TRANSLATION Meeting of January 27, 1982 Page 4 John Stoehner - (continued) contractor needless to say but even for the other ah, FBO's on the airport and ah, they have used Beetlefeld, Southcentral Air, even Kenai Aviation for transportation and ah, a large percentage of it has gone out on Wein Air, through their air cargo space and the majority of it has gone into Anchorage so to be shipped out on Western because they do have ah, ah midnight flight that makes straight connections to the, ah, where the majority of the product does go. Ah Oregon. But ah, it is the operation and the way that it functions, is very much tied in to aviation and and does require aviation or aircraft. Phil Bryson - the ah, the machine shop isn't addressed in the ah, in your site, your building floor plan John Stoehner - its ah, in the written ah, development that I wrote up and submitted, it is addressed ah, its a two page typed Phil Bryson - ok, yea, I got it John Stoehner - our ah, the problems that we're running into this, is its a fairly new venture for Mr. Holland and myself, we've been working on it now for about a month and ah, what we're waiting for at this moment is I have written to ah, government publications in Washington D.C. and have requested some tech orders and millstech publications from them and I'm waiting on these to be sent to me so that I can write what is known as an operations manual. This operations manual is needed by FAA ah, they will have to take it and study it and approve this manual before we can be certified and issue a repair station license for doing this work. Unfortunately there are businesses in the state that do this kind of work and they have their operations manual and even though FAA has copies of these operations manual, it's still private property and so it's not a matter of me writting off to FAA and saying hey, send me electro chome plating's operation manual cause I want to operate like they do. It's not that easy I have, we have to write our own manual. Phil Bryson - Jack ah, could you address the impact on the City's sewer system Jack LaShot - well, our new sewage plant, well our old one for that matter too, was not geared for any type of processing facility. I talked to Mrs. Stoehner just before Christmas about this but I haven't heard from her since then, but ah, she was the last time I talked to her looking in to getting some documentation that (inaudible) wouldn't be harmful and I have talked with a fellow from D.E.C. who said if properly screened VERBATIM TRANSLATION .Meeting of January. 27, 1982 Page 5 Jack LaShot - (continued) properly, screens were properly maintained, then it shouldn't be too much of a problem, however, in order to be sure I think there needs to be some more research done on that. Also, (inaudible) the load shouldn't be much greater than a typical restraunt (inaudible) John Stoehner - its not very, the load is not very much, 6,000 gallons is not that much Jack LaShot - over what time period John Stoehner - in ah, eight hours. And that, I think 6,000 is on the high side. Ah, unlike the fish processing plant, we don't have constantly running water, ah over the product, with a clam, unfortunately the more you wash it the less it tastes. It washes all the taste out of one all you wind up is a piece of rubber and this is one of the problems that we ran into last year, ah in trying to conform to one department of agricultures inspectors wishes we ran water over the product continuously so there was water running across the tables, ah, the people were doing the work it was running over they're hands and this is not warm tempered water it was. cold water coming-right straight out of the well and ah, we got some very unfavorable reception to this product, people were are ultimate consumer was writing back and telling us the stuff was tasteless and ah, it was washed out, but ah, in researching the regulations we found out that this was not a requirement that this was one inspectors personal ah, wish that we did it so we did discontinue that and we have gone back to just using the bowls and what this is is when the product is put into these bowls they're filled with water, and so, the product is submerged but its not a running water and the product is cleaned in these bowls and then the bowls are of course dumped. Ah after the product is processed. And ah so, ah, the gal may be working 10 - 15 minutes with this one bowl and the same water so, the water is not constantly changing over like ah, like with fishing industry down here where everything is moved by water and, the whole ah, the whole system is based on this running water. Ours is not. Phil Bryson - are the people you hire, is this a, is this a skill or is it more like a herring squeezing operation is it something John Stoehner - its a skill. Its ah, ah, the cleaners are are using a a little knife like a paring knife and ah it is a skill cleaning these little devils, if it came down to the point that I wanted to eat clams and I had to go over across the inlet dig 'em bring 'em back over here and clean 'em and then cook, I'd rather pay my wife and go buy it and pay her price. A lot easier. But ah, some of these some of the gals paid on a peice meal basis they make upwards to $15 to $18 an hour. So its not its not ah, a, job that somebody's going to just, you know try it one time and Phil Bryson - yea, your not going to pick kids off the street to be doing this. VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 6 >~ Meeting of January 27, 1982 John Stoehner - she has ah, gals now that have been working for her for four years. That started out with and they're still Phil Bryson - Wayne Wayne Regelin - I'd like Mr. Delahay if all of our discussion is really necessary if it's illegal Ben Delahay - I don't think it is, ah, if I may Mr. Chairman Phil Bryson - go ahead Ben Delahay = I don't like to be disagreable or or try to throw road blocks in the way of improvements or development but there are a number of reasons why I could not recommend this the first being is, as mentioned it is not within any possibly meaning a an airport related activity. The fact that the clams may be flown in and the product may be flown out is not ah, controlling. If it were then anything could be airport related from making shoes to growing hot house tomatoes, ah just the fact that its going to be on an airplane or it has been on an airplane does not make it an airport related activity. Ah, the machine shop itself of course with working on airplane engines would be. And certainly if its not available in Alaska something like that should be encouraged ah, if that were all it were and I can sympathize with Mr. 1 Stoehner's desire to concentrate the activities of his family so that it would be more efficient for him but that is not sufficient for this body or the council to approve something that would be antagonistic not only to any possible ruling the FAA might make but also as to what the council has said about holding these properties on the airport for airport related facilities. I have other opposition however in addition to that and that is that my office has found Arctic Aviation uncooperative unresponsive and irrisponsible in the conduct of two of the leases they have now. In one of them, lot 1 block 1 of GAA, they were written a letter on May 20th, 1980 with an amendment to their lease for renegotiation of the rental rate which was due July first 1980. There was no response to that letter. There was another letter, this was sent certified mail there was another dated July 25th 1980 reminding them that the amendment had not been returned. There was no my file shows no response to that letter. In September of 1980 there was ah, letter written from finance ah, relating to some oral statement that she had received I believe from Mrs. Stoehner claiming that Mr. Stoehner had made a protest to this ah, rent increase ah, at some meeting, I believe with the Planning and Zoning Commission, naw the council John Stoehner - the city council Ben Delahay - ah, the minutes of that city council meeting were examined and it was found that Mr. Stoehner had ah, asked to be heard but had not appeared. Ah, and Mrs. Parnell in writing this letter suggested they make a letter of written protest which of course then would be VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 7 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Ben Delahay - (continued) available and would be in the ah, file. There was no written answer to this letter. March 19, 1981, there was another letter noting a delinquency in their leases of some 2400 dollars. Ah, and warning of cancellation. Ah, evidently there was no response to this letter. In May 19, 26th 1981, ah there was another letter regarding return of amendment ah, on June second 1981, I wrote a letter ah, because I had heard I'd been shown this letter of ah, from finance saying that there had been some or made a claim of some oral protest, I wrote them a letter and asked them either return the amendment or start to negotiate that is was their respons- ibility to negotiate if they didn't agree and if they wished to negotiate that we had hired a an appraiser a registered appraiser to appraise this property and if they had any objection they should get an appraiser of their own choosing to appraise it and if there was a difference we could negotiate the difference. To date I have had no response to this letter which was written in June of last year. Ah, the rate that Arctic Aviation is paying on that land is $926.82 a year and anything under $2400 dollars a year is supposed to be paid in advance on July first. Ah, the rate of the amendement after an and I don't believe that this has been negotiated since 1966 there has been no change in it. The amendment requested a rate of $2640 starting July first 1980. At the time that the letter was written about these delinquencies they were delinquent ah, since that time they have brought they have been paying the old rate not the new rate not the proposed rate but the old rate they have come in and made monthly payments until they have caught up with all of their delinquencies based on their old rates. They have still as far as I know made no negotiations they have made no attempt to talk with me they have made no appraisals. On ah, lot 2 in block 1 it came up for renegotiation and for July first 1981 this last year there was a certified letter sent out from the city on March 26, 1981 and the that rate had been previously amended in 197 lets see 1976 it must have been to $2,000 a year. The amendment brought would bring this up to $3,000 a year. Again there was no response to this letter. There was a city letter of reminder went out May 26th 81 reminding them that the amendment had not been returned there was no response to that letter. There was a another letter went out June second and there was a response to that letter, by Arctic dated June the fifth 81. Ah, there was also a letter in the first lease dated June fifth 81 ah, I don't know it didn't refer to which lot but it just it merely said in two brief paragraphs that they were protesting and something about ah, the city attorney has acknowledge our oral protest as to new lease rates, this letter will also serve as written protest, we are joining other leasees in efforts to determine a fair and just rate. The lease they have with the city doesn't say anything about joining other leasees they are to negotiate with the city. And this they have completly failed to do. Ah, as long as the leases are not they have two leases that VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 8 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Ben Delahay - (continued) are not in good standing with the city. I would oppose granting any time of modification or any new lease to Arctic Aviation. I believe that at one time there was also an application of either Arctic or Mr. and Mrs. Stoehner, ah to lease lot 1 and 2 of FBO Subdivision. As I remember it they failed to go through with that until some other party came in with a lease offer on 1 and 2 and then they came in with an attorney and loudly protesting saying they were first and with the consent of the other party who agreed to move down, either two or three lots I forget just how many were involved, ah, they were allowed to come in and make application and their application was pursued and then when it come came to the final step of getting a lease, they never went through with it. The other party got leases to I don't know, 4, 5, and 6 was it and there were no leases on 1,2 and 3. Ah, this seems to be consistent with the conduct of their business affairs now, I don't know how much of this is related to economic circumstances. There may be a great deal of it. But that does not excuse the fact that they have not performed and basically what is before you now is something that I feel is against city policy, its against FAA policy in so far as a fish plant a clam processing plant is concerned and, I do not .believe it would be wise for the city to consider any such modification as long as Arctic Aviation has not lived up to the terms of their leases on the other two leases to lots 1, and 2 in block one, in fact if I don't hear from someone pretty soon about this its going to be a matter of sueing to cancel both of those leases for failure to perform according to terms of the leases. Phil Bryson - any other comments Jim Blanning - I'm a little confused ah, this is called a lease modification is that that correct is this a lease modification or this is an original or a reapplication. I went back to some of my old notes and find that they. had applied for lots 1, 2, and 3 in FBO Subdivision in 1979 and at that time they had asked for it for tie downs of aircraft and developed into a complete seafood processing facility fuel service warehousing and tie downs. Complete seafood processing facilities was lined out apparently and I guess he improved it but subsequently as Mr. Delahay says, in correspondence with their lawyer, the last word I had on it was, ah, the lawyer says for the foregoing reasons my client must reject the city's-.counteroffer and I guess itwas never I guess the lease was never consumated is that correct Ben Delahay - that`s correct. Now what is proposed here is a modification of the lease to lot 1 block 3 and this lease, ah incidentaly should be coming up for renegotiation the first of July of this year 1982. But the purposes for which the lease is issued are aircraft parking and storage. So to do anything else they need a modification. Even VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 9 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Ben Delahay - (continued ) for a machine shop. Phil Bryson - does that clarify your Jim Blanning - well I guess I guess on our lease application lot description is blank here, ah, and it wasn't clear to me just what lots they were asking for. So apparently its just lot 1 Phil Bryson - lot 1 of block 3, general aviation Jim Blanning - they're asking for a modification Phil Bryson - other comments John Stoehner - I ah Phil Bryson - go ahead John John Stoehner - ok, ah, Mr., your name? Phil Bryson - Delahay John Stoehner - yea, Delahay, I'm sorry, definitely done his homework. Ah, ~ is it correct we did make lease application on lots 1, 2, and 3 ah, ' north of the terminal up there. And our initial ah, application we did propose putting this ah, processing plant the same as I'm trying to do right now. And this was rejected by the city, at that time we didn't have very much knowledge of how much affluence, how much water, and and things like this we were going to be running through and the city became concerned that ah, there would be too much for the system to handle. And so we did amend the lease application and ah, true enough we were granted this application with our amendment to ah, not put in the processing plant. We were granted that in January the middle of the winter, with a lease rate of sixteen hundred dollars a month. And we were expected to pay this starting in January. Now we went back and we asked the city to amend thisand allow us then to start the lease application effective I believe in July at a time of the year when we could get in and clear the property, get it stabilized and ah, where it could become productive. Not in the middle of winter paying sixteen hundred dollars a month as Mr. Delahay pointed out. I'm not a rich man otherwise my ah, leases would not be in arrears, but ah, sixteen hundred dollars a month was just a little bit too much to try and bite off. And ah I, at this point I thank the city council for not ah, amending it and allowing me to take those lots because I would at this point in time I would definitely be in trouble because our whole economy in this area especially around the airport has been alot of downhill slide. This is also one of the reasons why you don't see me trying to expand my flight department and putting in aircraft sales or ah, or enlarging the VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 10 Meeting of January 27, 1982 John Stoehner - (continued) flight school because its not there. I have come in now tonight and asking for a amendment to this lease to put inihe facilities that I know will work. I know its viable cause I've been in it four years. Thank you. Ben Delahay - Mr. Chairman Phil Bryson - yes Ben Delahay - on that point Mr. Stoehner's correct, ah, as to that, as I remember the council did come back and offer to delay starting that lease and Mrs. Glick can correct me if I'm wrong on about March the first on the grounds that as of that date they could start clearing that land and there were trees all over it in order to be ready for construction when it could start in either May or June so that they could get on the land and start rather than delaying to the first of July, ah, so the city did offer to meet them half way but. Phil Bryson - what are the desires of the commission Jim Blanning - I would think with the the FBO restrictions, ah, right there would would conclude (inaudible)to a clam processing plant and in addition to the apparent unresolved difficulties with the city administration I would think we have problems. approving the application as submitted Phil Bryson - are there any lots ah, reasonably adjacent to the airport that would ah, conform to such an ah clam operation that could be purchased. We're ah, assuming that the ah, clamming is acceptable to the ah, operation of the sewer system Ben Delahay - I would have to review the zoning commission as to zoning restrictions I, I'm not sure about industrial ah, zoning lots near there, ah, I know they're commercial but whether they're industrial I just don't know. Ah, there arn't-any lots ah, in the immediate vicinity, there may be some in the subdivision available ah, ah, just east of the airport off of ah, Willow Street, over on Trading Bay Road or somewhere in that area Phil Bryson - Cook Inlet Industrial Ben Delahay - I'm not sure whether all the lots in there are taken or not and I'm not sure of the zoning of those lots. Jim are you aware Jim Swalley - the area your talking Trading Bay that is light industrial. Ah, I have to admit I am remiss, I've got an appointment or semi- appointment with the Administrative Assistant for the last two days and due to commitments we couldn't get together to try to explore if there are other properties available for this type of a ah venture. VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 11 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Jim Swalley - (continued) not necessarily on airport lands but, ah, the city owns many other lands also. And ah, like I say, we had an (inaudible) get together either yesterday afternoon or this afternoon but her time and my time didn't coincide to do this. But ah, the city does own other lands, if they are properly zoned in the right district or suitable of this type venture I don't know.. Ah there is a possibility like Mr. Delahay says that ah, there could ah, be on other airport lands also. It would take research on this matter Ben Delahay - its a matter of availability, again I'm relaying on memory but it appears to me that those lots in there are either sold or leased or they're. pretty well taken up. And ah, but, I, my second objection the first one of course is the use of the airport for non- related (change of tape) Phil Bryson - is anyone prepared to make a motion? Wayne Wayne Regelin - yes, all motions have to be in a positive manner and I make a motion that we approve the lease, Arctic Aviation, ah, for ah, clam processing plant on subdivision ah, block 3 lot 1 (parts inaudible due to rustling papers and low voices) Phil Bryson - its been seconded ah discussion, ah, ah, I would request that ah, some consideration be given to a motion not allowing the clam processing land but allowing the engine overhaul shop Wayne Regelin - ah, I would feel ah, I would look very favorably. on a, on an application to ah, have a engine overhaul shop, once you have reached an agreement with the city, ah, I believe we, would be remiss if we would allow ah, leases to be modified, in the leases, the, the, current ah, lease is not being ah, properly handled, but or even if we don't think so, and apparently are you going to planning to negotiate with the city on these leases John Stoehner - yes, what happened on these on all this airport property when the city hired an appraiser to come in he appraised all of this property at fair market value and this is what our lease rate is based on, not that they had a restricted use, for air ah, for aircraft tie down, and as stated in my ah, my ah, plan there, right now aircraft tie down is not a profitable business. I have 32 available tie down spaces, I have as of this morning when I wrote this plan I had 16 tie down spaces leased, as of 5:00 this afternoon I only have 15 because I lost one more customer, because he joined the Civil Air Patrol for $12.00 a year he gets free tie downs. Or if they go to Kenai or over to Soldotna and get paved, drive through tie down spaces for two hundred VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 12 Meeting of January 27, 1982 John Stoehner - (continued) a year. You know, ah tie down spaces ah, rental is not a profitable business. And obviously, I'm going to have to do something with this property to make it profitable and this is what I hope you all take into consideration tonight. Phil Bryson -further discussion on the motion. Jim Jim Swalley - I don't have discussion on the motion, I would like to ah, kind of explain, sort of the background on the situation, ah, both, ah, in Mr. Stoehner's favor and against Mr. Stoehner. Number one in past years, by however, whatever thinking of planning and zoning of council at that time we do have other ah, businesses in that same subdivision who are not aeronautical related, even though ah, reading through the case histories and for lease applications that they supposedly to be in, more aeronautical related in one sense or another, ah, I'm referring primarily to some businesses along Willow Street. Ah, getting back in specific to Mr. Stoehner's case the lot that he's talking about is an isolated lot, meaning without the lot number block 1 lot 2 right in front of it, on this diagram it appears the Arctic Aviation primarly lot (inaudible due to rustling papers) block 1 lot 1 next to it is lot 2 which is by the lease and applied for many years ago, ah, a tie down lot, or at lease below it is~;the lot in question and that lot by itself has no airport access without going through } block 1 lot 2. They have no taxiway access (inaudible) So these two lots have got to go together one way or another. Ah, what's happened is that ah, we're all kind of victims of ah, many years ago, platting and planning and so forth, and ah, what I'm trying to say is that this lot without the lot facing the taxiway is not of aeronautical use. However, we are restricted to maintain the airport in an aeronautical mode, so ah, no what am I trying to say, we're tied in, locked into a situation, the Stoehner's are locked into a situation this commission the city council's locked into a situation for actions that were taken many many years ago and it's going to take some kind of action or whatever by starting with this body, and not just this one situation we have others on the airport like this. But .starting with this body and then to council, we're going to have. to remedy alot of these particular situations that we got ourselves locked into, and when I say we I mean the city and depending on how far back we want to go but anyway the city itself is locked in, not just this one situation but many of them, so .its just likely something to think about to try to avoid future problems, such as this. Ben Delahay - Mr. Chairman Phil Bryson - yes VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 13 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Ben Delahay - if I may be heard, airport related purpose doesn't necessarily mean you have to taxi an airplane into it, a project such as Mr. Stoehner has suggested, a machine shop, you can drive up in a truck and deliver a a parts or buy parts, these are airport related, ah, and certainly if Mr. Stoehner brings himself, into the good graces of the city by living up to the terms of his other leases, ah, I can .see no reasons why his lease should not be ah, modified for any airport related activity. The reason that the use given on that lease was for airport parking and storage was because that's what Arctic Aviation requested at the time they leased the property. Normally the city doesn't have any problem modifying the lease as long as the purposes fall within the those for which the land can be used.. And I'm sure that they wouldn't in this case, and if Mr. Stoehner's unable ah, to use that land for other purposes, ah, and if it isn't paying for the ah, use that he has it for, ah, so that he feels that it is a loss to him and either the price he's paying now or what he might be paying under renegotiation in '82, I would suggest he approach the city manager for a cancellation, the city has cancelled other airport leases where ah, people feel that ah, they're they're not economically sound. And held them for someone who comes along who does have an economic use for them. Certainly the city is not in a position to demand that someone pay lease money more than land is worth for the purpose the only purpose that they can use it for, but if that is the only one they can use it for and it's not worth it to them let them cancel it. If they do have another purpose that's airport related, well then. let them request a modification of the lease. We have another lease not very far from there that brought up the same argument a while back and, and ah, they had an attorney who made a very extensive argument that for tie downs it wasn't worth it. I belive that ah, there was, ultimately an agreement a settlement of that matter and they're paying, ah, quite a bit more than ah, Stoehner is now paying on lot 1 block 3. Phil Bryson - I would, I would say if I ah, looking at the subdivision and ah, I would be more inclined to attached that lot 1 block 3 with lot 1 block 2 in not allowing any ah, if those are broken apart, I guess they are right now in leases, but ah, there's no access, to the street from lot 2. John Stoehner - nor is there any taxiway access to lot 1 Phil Bryson - thats right, yea (voices covering each other and inaudible separately) Phil Bryson - so I, you know, if more than anything else they should be combined VERBATIM TRANSLATION Page 14 Meeting of January 27, 1982 Phil Bryson.- (continued) rather than broken apart. Ben Delahay - at least to the same party so at present time they are combined Phil Bryson - yea, but its>.a separate lease Ben Delahay - separate leases Phil Bryson - but that's another matter. Ah, further discussion? Jim Blanning - I feel very comfortable with the engine overhaul shop and ah, perhaps if these were separated out at a later date and brought back that way, ah, I'd feel comfortable with the whole project but right now it says clam processing and the engine overhaul, and I would have a hard time with the clam processing under the circumstances so the discussion John Stoehner - Mr. Chairman. Ah, I'm not a gambler, per say, I don't own a very good poker face to start off with, ah, one of the reasons why we have put the clam processing in there is because I do know that its a money maker. I can make money with it. A machine shop, that's a gamble. But I`ve got one business in there that I know can .carry it. The other one, I'm willing to gamble on. But, to say to stand here and tell you than I'm going to a machine shop in that airport and we're going to be ~ able to do all this, (inaudible) and to stand here and tell you, yes, everybody in the state of Alaska is going to send me their engines and allow me to do their work, there's no way. I'm as big a gambler as the man that has lot, ah lot number 4 up there with that air freight building setting on it. He gambled, its been setting empty for over a year. Why I don't know, maybe his lease is too, maybe his rental on the building is too much he's asking too much. But, building is setting there and its empty. I'm not the big of a gambler. Ah, at this point I will have to say that if the clam processing is turned down then I will have to withdraw my petition. Phil Bryson - anything else. Question Secretary - (called for roll call vote, motion failed unanimously) -~~ ~ ~- \ ~ '~` v\ u z H H W z 0 ~~, ~~ 0 U z H 2 Q N Q z Q~ z z z a a `::1' ~ ._-~~ .- ~.u. "~ ~ r.--' \~,-7% ~~ ~~ o ~a ~-' U .,~~ ~_ z. __ _. ~ _T 0 7. .'-{ a r-i v ~ o ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ o' ~ U ~"' U c~ ~ ~ ti ,~, -.» ~ ~ \ ~, ._. a~ ~, OJ __. b0 .~, .~ -t L: . ~, r+ ~ o ~ ~ u •~, v ~ '~ V ~ ~ ~w N ~ ~.O ~"' , i-~ i ~ ~ +~ x ar ~ a, W w ? ~ ~, ~~_ ,, ., mil' f CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION N0. 81-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DESIGNATING 1984 AS A TIME OF RECOGNITION AND CELEBRATION OF ALASKA'S 25th ANNIVERSARY OF STATEHOOD AND APPOINTING A TASK .FORCE TO ORGANIZE THE EVENTS. WHEREAS, 1984 will mark the 25th Anniversary of Alaska State hood after 92 years of Territorial status, and WHEREAS, Alaska has contributed immeasurably to the health, wealth and well-being of the rest of the United States, and WHEREAS, Alaska may have the potential to substantially reduce the United States' energy crisis, and WHEREAS, Alaskans in the year 1984 will celebrate the Alaska "spirit" of individuality, the last frontier, the land of abundant natural resources, and the immense expanse of it's natural state, and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the PJlayor, City Council, and citizens of Kenai to celebrate Alaska's historic milestones during 1984, and WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon us all to pay tribute to the men and women who braved the untold hardships necessary to carve out of the wilderness the Great State of Alaska. i ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that: A. That the City of Kenai, through it's Mayor and City Council, does hereby designate and proclaim officially the year 1984 as a time of recognition and celebration of our past and present, and a time of rededication to the great Alaskan future, and B. That there shall be appointed by the Mayor a 1984 Task Force which, consistent with this Resolution shall: 1. Recommend for the 1984 observances goals, objectives, programs and events, cooperate with any worthy Statewide activity designed to enhance the celebration and report said conclusions and activities to the Mayor and City Council. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI ASKA, this 21st day of January, 1981. ~ ~L ~.~ ~ ~ VINCENT O'REILLY, ~YOR ATTEST: ,~'dnet Whelan, City Clerk r CITY OF KENAI ! P. O. 8OX 580 KENAI, ALASKA 99611 ~ ---- TELEPHONE 283 • 7535 u There will be a public discussion at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of January 27, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. at City Council Chambers on ALASI:A 1984. All persons wishing to participate with ideas are asked to attend. i J t Whelan, City Clerk Dated: January 21, 1982 ~ Publish: January 25, 26, 27, 1982 KENAI CITY COUrICIL JAN. 20, 1982 Page 2 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS O~YAPP8O9-~D ~ B-1 Ruby Coyle - Public Safety Within the City of Kenai, Parking Lots & Roads Mrs. Coyle noted there was a discussion regarding safety on KSRM, Sound-Off program recently. She has discussed in the past an alternate route around the City. She is aware the State has to put stop lights in, but she believes we should join forces to petition the State for a stop light where Beaver Loop crossed the Highway. We should not wait till someone is killed. We also need a traffic light at the other end of town. The 35 MPH speed limit should be moved beyond Walker Lane. Also, the street corners are not being sanded enough. The Fire Dept. area is one. Another factor is the height of the snow berms. There are places where you cannot see at the corners. Another problem is in front of Carr's store. Everyone says someone else is responsible. She thinks it can be worked out with Carr's. Councilman Wagoner suggested City Manager Brighton write to our Legislators to work with Dept. of Highways for additional lights. He noted we have had 5 studies he knows of, they just do another study. Police Chief Ross said every year his dept. is in correspondence with the State on all traffic problems. The State is considering moving the speed limit to Walker Lane. The traffic lights are a problem. Tractor trailers at the intersection of Spur have to go into 2 lanes to turn. Money has been requested in the 1984 budget for a study. The Carr's parking lot problem is a philosophical and political decision that should be made by Council. It is on private property. Anchorage has accepted this responsibility. The schools, apartments, and businesses enforce their own parking lots. Councilwoman Glick noted they had many meetings a while ago and agreed not to interfere with private business. Mayor O'Reilly asked if Willow & Spur was a problem with the semi's. Chief Ross replied no, they use alternate routes. He added we have .had studies on all major turns in the City for traffic lights. MOTION: Councilman Wagoner moved, seconded by Councilwoman Glick, that a message be directed to DOT to accelerate corrective measures necessary. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. B-2 Alaska 1984 Representative Rod Pfleuger and Jim Sharp. Rod Pfleuger explained he is the fund raiser, Jim Sharp is the controller. He said Alaska 1984 was •~+.~-~-N .-, ~.. .emu r+u ~. ~.iaay vaa ~,aac a/a11vL wvulu uCbl.1 VY L11C intent on getting it done by 1984. Any requirements for facilities would be worked in with State planned appropriations. It is not their plan to build any new buildings. Councilwoman Glick asked if there were any other communities in other areas allocated ~` funds. Mr. Sharp replied they have an office in Fairbanks coordinating the effort up there. Mr. Pflueger said Alaska 1984 can take the form of a program or project or both. They are asking the Kenai community what is best needed for Kenai. The Central Committee will solidify and coordinate. Councilwoman Glick asked if they had a target date for 1984. Mr. Pflueger replied that is still being considered. They would like to extend the tourist season front and back. They would like it to start Jan. 3, 1984, that is when we became a State. Mayor _. O'Reilly asked, has there been any definition on the + project, what is local and what is State share? Mr. `~ Sharp replied, it is still being determined. Council- man Wise suggested oil is our central industry. The emphasis should be on promotional of courses in petroleum industry at the Community College. The industry has influence on the State and the Greater Kenai area. Mayor O'Reilly noted Council did pass a Resolution supporting the effort and appointing a committee. He has withheld appointing till he finds out how Council feels about this. Councilman Measles asked, what if we form a task force and they decide Kenai does not want to get involved? Mr. Sharp replied, the City has no liability as far as the $2,000 is concerned. Mayor O'Reilly said the Task Force would. have to be completed by Feb. 17, 1982 '~~ to present to Council. Councilwoman Glick suggested Planning & Zoninq Commission take on the responsi- bilities, the Commission is already in place. Mayor O'Reilly added, at least do the 1st part of the task and publish for public input. Then we could get the commission started. Councilman Wagoner said he is against the whole process, it is a waste of time and money. MOTION: Councilwoman Glick moved, seconded by Councilman Measles, to formalize Planning & Zoning Commission be delegated the task force responsible in dealing with Alaska 1984 responsibilities. Motion passed, with Councilman Wagoner voting no. Councilman Wise asked, do we have official notification of the $2,000 grant? Mr. Sharp replied it will be in the mail tomorrow, officially this is notification. Finance Director Brown said he would draft an approp- riating ordinance for the next meeting. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 Ordinance 747-82 - Increasing Rev/Appns - Purchase of Station Wagon - $13,000 -----~\ DE9F.LOPMENT PLAN Block 1 Lots 1, 2~ 3 Kenai Airport`-Alaska... INTRODIICTION: Aa requested by the planning and zoning commiaion City of Kenai Alaska. The following 2 year development plan for block 1.lota 1, 2, 3 Kenai Airport is respectfully subaitted by Dan 0. Pitta and Robert Roth. Pending approval of the lease application for the above lots by the City Council of Kenai, construction of a large aircraft air cargo,freight, fuel, and maintenance facility will begin after break up 1982 as follows: MAY 1 82: Tree removal and ground preparation to large aircraft specifications airport ramp aide of lots 1, 2; 3.. OGTOBER/1982: Gourd preparation completed power into lots 12X16 temporary office constructed, fuel storage tanks buried ~ ovex• burden disposed of off airport. [~8~,: Construction of founds#ion for hangar and storage facility (approx. 50ft. X 100ft. metal building) begins. October/1983: .Hangar and storage facility gravel parking area completed . Future plans call for paving aircraft ramp area and proposed additional buildings as needed. Dan 0. Pitts Robert Roth 4, *.~%~~3 V } ~- n W Q Z Q 0 -_ -_ - _ 300' - O" W U Q ~~ a z W F- ~> ~7 W Z_ v W Y d ~ ~ N Q a O loo'•~ I%2° SLOPE SOUTH J JJ W W ~ Q Q - ~ ~ 0 a w ~ a 0 Q J J ~ ~ ~ ~ a l~ cA ~ Y Z I I ~ I ~ - - - - - - - - - i I PROPOSED I ~ NANGER l I I A ~ ---------~ A O 0~ M O _~ 0 0 N _~ O QI O Z ~ Q ~n ~ r V W (~ /~I q~ .~ ~F~a ~-4 a, `~ '•,T '.: X r '~g ~v ;A ~y - ~\ ~/C / \ ^~ i / ' ' ^~~ / /\ // / ` ~ /, / / 'c ti ~ s~o ~ S92 j ~ ~/- ' 3y 4 ~ J- ~~ ~~ . 1 I / /c'.G O~ P, oa I" k ,r?y V 'j' ///(viii o -~~ ~ ' ~,, ~~zti~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ,~ y. •,S ~ . a yFr E ." A, ~. ` ` ~: ~ ' .7 \ Q ` y~2 O~ .~ ~ 2sOo; ~~ \~`. O ~~ J \ ~ GAO ~ \O r~ ~ ~ ,~, ~ "' O ~ cP ds~. ~L T~.,T ~ ~ 3 `jy2 '0 ~ h~ ~' ~i ~. ~ '., ~~ ~O / / '' ,~ ~ \ V ~ Tj/y ~~` rr__~ \~ ~~~ v % / / y2aJ . . y~ ~ / . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~, ~ , ~~ ^~ ~ ~ Cam/ /^i \;/,j~ /\ i ~ ~- ,~~, ~ ~ ~/i ~.~. ~~ s / ~.. \ n,1 '~ - / • 2 V, : / y. ~.~ _ f ~. _- Name of Applicant ~~='~ ~' ~ -~'~%i~.-i ___ -__ ,. ,_.. !, l Address F.O. ;.~.r :50r:e~c=-, =~~ ~s_.~_ ~'c , Business Name and Address =~~~~~=~-- =~~,~-~~_~~: I:.c. ~~'-: 550: -.enai, A~_s~t~~. 995l_1. Kenai Peninsula Borough Sales Tax No . %~~`,''r (if applicable) State Business License No. 5^~~=L5 (if applicable) Telephone 'ct_'^~-:%° (Check One) Lease Permit Lot Description Desired Length. of Lease; Property. to be used for ,1~.-.. p ^ce~;_- P1~u_~ ~_n J~ ine Overh~~u1 s~~::,-,~ Description of Developments (type, construction, size, etc.) Attach development plan to scale (1" = 50'), showing all buildings planned. Time Schedule for Proposed Development: Beginning Date Proposed Completion Date - --~ ~-~ Estimate Value of Construction ~ $ ',-~ nr~r, r~~n Date: _-._-~~ --- -- Signed: f ~ ,~ ~;-. , _ c~~t Page 1 of 4 (.11 2" Vr !1L'lvtii P. O. BOX 580 - KENAI, ALASKA PHONE 283-7535 :fr.~ .. LEASE APPLICATION ~" .. 3 N N h N ~.I O N V N /' ~~~ /l ...1..... N_ / • ~1 ... `FP ~ i // i ~ O -~ P ~~ I h . `....... ~ ~ I e \26 ~e 1 ~, ~~~ I 1 i 1 IZ S9 -S/F i 1 ~ \ "G\ ;, . _~ I 1 d I 1 _ I i I I 1 o o N -- ,£b 881 - 3,81 0l9 5 -~ / ~`/ Z~~ 0 } Y rh .; ~GI` 1 z i ~ 1 ~ i _ I N ~o n N ~ ._ i ~ i I j ~- I J o 2 i ~ o- w V, ~ 2 I o- `^ ~ •: s ~' I r ~ ~T~~ 1 _ ~h~ ooz N ~`( i. N Q m U ~ W h Q > W 2 O W ` Y N L ~ k Q C S f- ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ U c W _~ ~ C_ O ? ~ i ~ ~ t J ~ C (Y ti ~ C ~_ ~ ~ W l ~ ~ G J t< ~ O ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Y c 2 ~~ b Q h Q ~:.- -__- ~,~ , TC -- -- - - - --- _ awn, xc:±y rj~. - - - ,, __ r. ,-~ ~ -- - - - _ l ~, r- _ ., ~ -- ~~~ ' ~; ~ :~ ~. ~ r h ~ _ _ t ~ ~ ~~ ~, I - - - - - ~ F ~ : 5 ~ ~ ;, t~_. inS ?r ~ ci D yj d b ` ,\i aC _ o .~ i . ,~ 2_Q - ~` ~y 1 i~1 ti~ K I ` ~ y _ _ _ _ __ _ _ - ~. 5 j y ~ '~ c% ~ _ ~ C; ~ 4 _ Il 2 i H L ~~ ~ ~ -. - • ~ ' ~ - ~' cn in . ~ ~, ', ~:~.: ~~ •z 'i s r ^' T yi V } l~ 4 ~' ~ ~~a =C v b _s z 0 a Q e M ~ ~ ~ ti 1 8 u `` :. .r _ ~ ,~ ,; ~ o M \ ,o _ O - ~ci 'C ~' o p M IV ~~ c s ~~ 0 g V a M ~. t Arctic Aviation, Inc. Development and Use of Lot 1, Block 3 General Aviation Apron It is the intention of Arctic Aviation, Inc. to construct a 30' X 60' steel building on Lot 1, Block 3, General Aviation Apron with a lease arraingement with Northern Lights Fisheries, Inca Northern Lights Fisheries, Inc. will occupy slightly more than half the building for the purpose of processing Razor Clams, and the remaining portion of the building will be leased to Mr. John Stoehner and TIr. Ken Holland to establish a certified repair station for the repair and overhaul, of aircraft engines and componants. Northern Lights Fisheries, Inc. and It's owners have been in the Clam processing business for four years with all of its raw product being .flown into the Kenai Municipal Airport and that product which they produce for human consumption being air- freighted out of the Kenai Municipal Airport; resulting in a substantial amount of business for air charter and airfreight companies. It is the desire of N.L.F., Inc. to be located on the Airport to further reduce the handling and transportation time of their product; and the desire of its owners to consolidate other businesses. The proposed lease to Mr. Stoehner and Mr. Holland for their repair station will result in a service not now available in Alaska. Their proposal is for the repair and overhaul of Aircraft engine and componants that are now having to be sent outside of Alaska because of no repair facilities of this nature being in existence in Alaska. It is their intention of establishing a machine shop that will be able to weld engine cases, align bore., machine mating surfaces, chrome cylinders, weld cylinder heads, and grind cylinders. The nature of these two businesses in the same building will cause the water and sewer having to be completely separate; also a two hour gire wall separating them. Northern Lights Fisheries, Inc. realizes their higher usage of the water and sewer, and through their experience has determined it to be approximately 6,000 Gallons per eight-hour production. N.L.F., Inc. will have installed a trap to eliminate effluence, (i.e.: sand, shells) from reaching the sewer system. It is the desire of Arctic Aviation, Inc. to construct this building for further utilization of it's leased airport property. Arctic Aviation has experienced a decline of general aviation need for the down space of aircraft. Arctic Aviation, Inc. presently has space for thirty-two (32) aircraft with only sixteen (16) rented spaces. The proposed building site would eliminate only three (3) tie down spaces. _ ~ Employee vehicle parking would be in the existing parking facility at Arctic Aviation, Inc., and would create no interference with aircraft. The city of Kenai has proposed a perimeter security fence for the airport with a gate access onto this x lot. This will pose no problem for tenants or the city of Kenai. A water main, sewer main, street paving, curbing and gutters are being constructed inthe spring of 1982. It is hopeful that the sewer and waterlines for this facility can be tied in during this construction period, thereby eliminating any additional excavation having to be performed at a later date. Page Two (2)