Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-01-26 P&Z Minutes KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Kenai City Hall Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 ;n _ /1 AGENDA ~-"- /' 1. ROLL CALL a. '- Installation of New Members b. Election of Officers 2. PUBLIC HEARING a. Variance Request: KZC 21.76.080 C 2-4, Development Requirement allowing zero lotline for the construction of Horizon View Townhomes in Redoubt Terrace Subdivision No. 6 (PZ83-1) 3. AGENDA APPROVAL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 8, 1982 5. OLD BUSINESS (The a. b. c. d. e. f. g• h. i. J• k. 1. following p Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary 6. NEW BUSINESS Lats w Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: Plat: ere held PZ82-37, PZ82-38, PZ82-39, PZ82-40, PZ82-41, PZ82-42, PZ82-43, PZ82-44, PZ82-45, PZ82-46, PZ82-47, PZ82-48, over from the meeting of Koa Circle Sub. Jenkins Sub. (Se Porter's Acres (Se White Country Sub. (Se Barrie Sub. Spruce Grove Sub. No. 2 Peck Sub. (Se Anderson Sub. Meeks Sub. Golden North Estates Hinkle-Murray Sub. Walker Sub. December 8, 1982 e Overview map) e Overview map) e Overview map) - replat of lot 5 e Overview map) a. Special Consideration: Setback Violation, Lot 3 Block 5 Thompson Park Subdivision, Mr. Ron Hobbs b. Hearing Request: Encroachment on property belonging to Catholic Church & City of Kenai, Mr. John Williams c. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-2, Redoubt Terrace Subdivision, Addition No. 6 d. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-5, Subdivision of Lot 3-A Spur Subdivision No. 4 with request for exception from 3-1 limitation e. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-6, Central Heights Subdivision, First Addition f. Resolution PZ83-4, Changing & Establishing Street Name s within the City of Kenai KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ~ AGENDA Page 2 7. PLANNING 8. OTHER BUSINESS a. City Council Report b. Borough Planning Report c. City Administration Report 9. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 10. COMMISSION QUESTIONS & COMMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT t KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ~~~ ~rt Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Kenai City Hall 1. ROLL CALL a. Present: Bob Roth, Mary Quesnel, Lee Lewis New Members Sworn In: Chris Monfor, Ozzie Osborne, Phil Bryson and Hal Smalley b. Election of Officers There now being 7 members, nominations were opened. MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Bob Roth to nominate Lee Lewis as Chairman MOTION: Hal Smalley closed the nominations Lee Lewis was elected Chairman MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Phil Bryson, to nominate Bob Roth as Vice Chairman Bob Roth was elected Vice Chairman MOTION: Phil Bryson moved,. seconded by Hal Smalley to close the nominations. Vote passed. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Variance Request: KZC 21.76.080 C 2-4 Development Requirment allowing zero lotline for the construction of Horizon. View Townhomes in Redoubt Terrace Subdivision. Add. No. 6 (PZ83-1) Note: Commissioner Bryson obstained due to conflict of interest, his firm is handling the Horizon View Contract. Linda Munstermann of Horizon. Construction and one of the two parties submitting the request was first to speak to explain the concept. Ms. Munstermann explained the townhouse concept where a part of the dwelling KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 2 and a part of the land are sold. In this case it would be a duplex style dwelling and the land below it and on three sides of it. She also explained. that the variance also asked for relief from the 5' sideyard setback as a duplex would straddle the lot line eliminating the sideyard on one side, requiring a zero lotline. Ms. Munstermann indicated that one side of the duplex with lot would sell for about $115 to $L20,000. Recess to view plans Chris Martin asked Ms. Munstermann what was set up for the lots in the rear, she explained that the owner of the lot owns all the way to and including the bluff. Mrs. Martin stated that she did not think a variance was supposed to change a zoning ordinance that mandates a 60' lot. Ms. Munstermann explained that the City does not have ord- inances to deal with townhomes as yet and it was done this way as a temporary measure. There is a townhouse in existence in Kenai, built by McCubbins. Chris Martin asked that the minutes reflect the state- ment that there had been a previous townhome referred to which was to set a precedent and according to the Council in writing, that was"not to set a precedent". Mrs. Martin also indicated that when she purchased her home in this subdivision she was told that the land that is under consideration for the variance was set aside for a park. Mrs. Martin questioned why only one person in the subdivision was notified of the public hearing, the secretary explained the procedure. Mrs. Martin asked about the subdivision covenants, it was explained that the City cannot interfere with private subdivision covenants. Mrs. Martin mentioned that there is a cow moose and her twins that roam the proposed subdivision area and would like to see them protected. Mrs. Martin further requested that on behalf of the Redoubt Terrace Home- owners:Association the Planning Commission deny the variance request. Dr. Carignon (correct spelling unavailable) asked if there was a process to change its charter or can it simply pass a variance when it does not meet the criteria. Dr. Carignon stated that he does not want to see subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances changed unilaterally by Council without going through procedure. Subdivision ordinances mandate 60' wide lots. Ms. Munstermann stated that it is mandated for a duplex, Dr. Carignon disagreed, it is 60' for any sub- division. Dr. Carignon stated that the City needs to decide if this type of housing is what it wants and then go through the procedures to make the necessary changes. The Council needs to address not only do we want this type of housing but where do we want it and then create a plan that would meet the needs of these persons. ~) KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 3 Troy Castimore stated that since the City does not have an ordinance covering this type of situation which says it is allowable then the ordinance at the time does preclude. Mrs. Sally Bailie is a property owner effected by multi family dwellings. Because of the multi family dwelling now in that subdivision, property values have fallen. Mrs. Bailie explained that while living in Mommsens Subdivision, the multi family dwellings kept spreading and because of this factor, their house sold for approximately $50,000 less than if the house were elsewhere, this according to the realtor. Mrs. Bailie brought up the covenants factor for Redoubt Subdivision, Ms. Munstermann stated that the covenants will not cover the newer property, that the covenants cover only the property subdivision or developed at the time of drawing up the covenants. Mrs. Bailie stated that while the City cannot enforce covenants it would be hoped that during a public hearing the Commission would keep the covenants in mind. These covenants allow for multi family dwellings only where they exist at the present and that is along Forest Drive, and that minimum lot size should be 8,000 square feet. Since the City cannot enforce covenants it would be hoped the Commission would keep in mind that there is only one subdivision in the City that has single family dwellings only and no protection for thsoe living elsewhere who want to keep their subdivision for single family dwellings only. Mr. Ron Martin addressed incidents of police calls in the area of the existing apartments and townhouses than any single family house in Redoubt. Mr. Martin stated that he has owned townhouses in California and that these are not true townhouses. In addition, Mr. Martin also expressed his concerns over being told that the .land in question was set aside for a park. As to the market for singel family dwellings, there would not be as great a return than the alternative of duplexes but single family dwellings of the kind described would sell and be an asset. Mr. Martin agreed with Mrs. Bailie regarding the property values decreasing and. the crime rate increasing with multi family housing regardless of the type of ownership. Mr. Stan Westbrook stated that he and his wife are opposed to the idea for all the reasons previously stated plus the fact that traffic would be generated. Mr. Westbrook stated that he had bought his property just recently and would not have bought where he did if he had known these units would be going in there. Mrs. Anita Necessary spoke in opposition and presented a petition signed by the homeowners of the Redoubt Terrace Subdivision Homeowners Association and some persons who did not live in Redoubt and asked that it be entered in the record. KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ~ Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 4 Mr. Glen Jackson stated that he lived in the subdivision for 14 years and part of the reason he bought where he did was the quality of the residential district and if he had known about the zoning he would have had second thoughts, not wanting multi family housing so close. Mr. Vic Tyler asked if Ms. Munstermann would be legal if htere was no zero lot line. Ms. Munstermann stated that it would be legal, if she left it as duplexes she would not have to have the variance. Bernie Doyle stated that he was opposed to the plan for all the reasons stated plus when building multiple family dwellings you bring a different element into the neighborhood, no matter how many families live in them or that they have purchased those units. He stated that he had had a chance to buy a house closer to the current townhouses for less money but chose to pay. more and live farther away and requests the Commission turn down this variance to maintain the character of the area. Chairman Lewis turned comments over to the Commission. Commissioner Monfor asked for clarification of afire wall, Mr. Henrickson explained. Commissioner Monfor asked where water & sewer was located, Ms. Munster- mann stated that it ran in front. of Necessarys. Commissioner Monfor asked if these costs were going to be added to the cost of the indivi- dual units, Ms. Munstermann answered yes and explained the cost break- down. Commissioner Monfor further questioned what development plans were in store for the property on either side of this subdivision, Ms. Munstermann stated that Mr. Near and Horizon Construction were in touch on this. Commissioner Smalley indicated that he found no existing physical circumstances surrounding. item c and went on to state that on the original .plat, Redoubt Subdivision went all the way to the bluff and felt there might be a legal problem with that and asked if the city attorney could take a look at that. Ms. Munstermann stated that Redoubt does go all the way to the bluff and that property as it is developed and recorded do-:not come under the existing covenants. Several persons in the audience asked what happened to the park that was originally planned for the property. Mr. Near stated that in 1979 Glad Realty showed a planned park on a plat, however he felt that perhaps that was intended for the beach area. At one time that land had been. considered being set aside for recreational use only. Commissioner Smalley informed those present and the new members that the Commission and administration have been working on townhouse ordinances and further that the townhouses .that were approved in KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 5 Redoubt were not to set a precedent in that those buildings already existed as apartments. Commissioner Osborne felt that he would be opposed to granting the variance, one factor being .that of the feelings of the people living in the subdivision, the second being the domino effect of creating this type of housing. Commissioner Monfor also felt that the feelings of the homeowners in the subdivision should be taken into consideration and went on to question the planning of the City where there wouldn't be a house next to an apartment type complex everywhere. Commissioner Monfor stated that she felt strongly about looking at an overall plan for the entire city. Mr. Howard Hackney, City Building Inspector stated that the procedure is correct to go for a variance to the code. When townhouses are built they are not a duplex, each one is a single family house that just happen to sit on a property line, one person owns that house and lot just as you own your house and lot, the difference being they don't have one side yard. If this is denied, they can make 3 lots and put 3 6-plexes on it and do not have to go through the planning process. Commissioner Smalley stated that he felt it would be in the best interest of the Commission and .the public that has appeared here to get more information and perhaps a legal opinion. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to postpone approval of PZ83-1 until further information can be obtained. MOTION AMENDMENT: Commission Smalley moved to set a date for the postponement which would be the next meeting, February 9, 1983 with another hearing, seconded by Commissioner Roth. Both motions passed unanimously Commission called a recess 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Chairman Lewis stated that item 6-c would be postponed as it dealt with the variance request and would appear on the next agenda, the same with item 6-b. Agenda approved with 2 postponements. KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 6 Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 8, 1983 Chairman Lewis asked that the voting be checked on the motion on page 2 as he had thought he voted yes. This will be checked before the next meeting. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved, seconded by Commissioner Roth to unanimously approve the minutes. 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-37, Koa Circle Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ82-37 with correction of negative findings, seconded by Commissioner Smalley Commissioner Roth asked if there would be any problem with the water & sewer coming into the cul-de-sac. It was explained that the note was at the request of the city engineer and that it was usually requested when developers want cul-de-sacs. Commissioner Bryson stated that he knew the city has been less than happy at the establishment of many cul-de-sacs, in lieu of that is the city administration prepared to submit a policy. Jack LaShot stated that it is pretty hard to develop some property without these and the city goes along if it is necessary, and further that the city provides the manholes and stubouts but it is up to the developer to bring the water & sewer to the property. Commissioner Bryson then asked if all these plats presented this evening should be considered as though water & sewer was available, the answer was yes, as the city had informed these developers that the city would be putting in water 7 sewer stubouts but that the developers would have to submit preliminary plats so that they could be located. Commissioner Osborne asked if plats are required to show utility ease- ments, Commissioner Bryson indicated that once the plat is submitted to the Borough, the Borough sets up a meeting with utility companies to determine where they should go and they then appear on the final plat. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote ~ KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 8 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ82-39, Porter's Acres Sub. with a temporary cul-de-sac be part af_the plat, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. Motions passed unimously d. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-40, White Country Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Roth to approve PZ82-40 with item 12 being request of platting temporary cul-de-sac. Motion passed unanimously e. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-41, Barrie Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Roth to approve PZ82-41. There were no objections ~' f. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-42, Spruce Grove Sub. No. 2 MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of PZ82-42, Spruce Grove Sub. Not seconded by Commissioner Bryson. Motion passed unanimously g. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-43, Peck Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Smalley to table this item being on of the plats in question. There were no objections h. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-44, Anderson Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ82-44, Anderson Sub, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. Commission asked if the city had any problems with it, Jack LaShot answered that there were none. Motion passed unanimously KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 9 Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 i Preliminary Plat: PZ82-45, Meeks Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of PZ82-45, Meeks Sub. with correction of negative findings, seconded by Commissioner Roth. There were no objections j. Preliminary Plat: PZ82-46, Golden North Estates MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Monfor to approve PZ82-46. Motion passed k Preliminary Plat• PZ82-47, Hinkle-Murray Sub. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ82-47, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. The commission reviewed the odd shaped lots, lot sizes, access and water & sewer access. Mike McLane explained that the reason the subdivision was broken up the way it is is because the south parcel was land locked and could not be used so the two owners got together and worked out this plan for freeing that lot. VOTE: Motion passed with Commissioners Bryson, Lewis, Smalley, and Roth voting yes; Commissioner s Monfor and Osborne voting no 1 Preliminary Plat: PZ82-48, Walker Sub ._ MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of PZ82-48 with correction of negative .findings, seconded by Commissioner Roth. Motion passed unanimously 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Special Consideration: Setback Violation, Lot 3 Block 5 Thompson Park Snh . Mr . Ron fiobb s Mr. Jess Lobdell the surveyor explained that he had done an as-built for Mr. Hobbs and found that one corner.. of the foundation encroaches on the setback by about 4' however, given the shape of the lot and } the markers available the mistake was easily done. The hub & tack that was set in 1965 was not located however the guard tack was which was for the street and on the other street the utility companies had KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 10 Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 put stacks about 7' into the lot, making the layout at the time of constructing the foundation into the setback lines. Commissioner _Bryson asked if on the original plat the setback was 20' and now it is 25' so which would take precendence. Discussion followed and it was decided that the zoning would take precedence. After discussion it was decided that the appropriate solution would be a variance. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved that Mr. Hobbs be contacted and asked to file a variance items 4 a,b,c, & d as called for in 21.76.220, seconded by Commissioner Osborne.. Commissioner Bryson stated that these problems have been coming up frequently and would like to see some method whereby builders would get as-builts so that they know they are on the lot or would pay the consequences for the gamble. Surveyors come before us for variances because of poor planning. and .there should be a penalty involved. Perhaps the penalty should be the cost of an as-built. This is not a lost cost, because an as-built has to be done anyway. It was suggested that anus-built be required before a building permit was issued and to this effect a memo is to be typed taking the comments of the Commission to the Public Works department for their consideration. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous .roll call vote. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to have the planning secretary make a memo to go to public works requesting that department review a policy that would not permit the issuing of building permits until the developer has conformed to the code, seconded by Commissioner Bryson. The motion passed unanimously d. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-5, Subdivision of Lot 3-A Spur Sub No. 4 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to approve PZ83-5 as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Roth. Commissioner Bryson asked if there was an allowance for 0 lotline in KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 11 Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 a commercial zone, Howard Hackney stated that there are no setbacks in commercial zones and if you build to the lot line, then afire wall is required, but if you own the lots you can build over it. It was explained that this plat is similar to the one presented by Vic Tyler of lot 1 of the same subdvision and is subdivided for the same purpose, that of financing, the cost of one. large lot being prohibitive. What the commission would be approving is the subdivision of the lot so that Mr. Aase could get assistance with financing to go ahead with his hotel/lounge. Mike McLane explained that the plat was done in this way with the site plan included so that the commission could see the entire proposal and see that each lot could stand alone if need be. The leases will also be handled as two separate leases. VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote e. Preliminary Plat: PZ83-6, Central Heights Sub. First Addition MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Smalley to approve PZ83-6 with notes. VOTE: Commissioner Bryson asked if the city had any problem with the 50' ROW. Jack LaShot stated that normally the city has trouble with these but not in this case. Motion passed unanimously f. Resolution PZ83-4, Changin & Establishing Street Names within the City of Kenai The Commission reviewed the large plat indicating the street positions and proposed names. It was explained that these name changes came about-first as a housekeeping measure for public works, having been requested by that department and second naming of streets appearing in the new subdivisions going into the McKinley and Linwood areas. Both public works and the developers requested the names be drawn up by the planning secretary. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved. to approve PZ83-4, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. There were no objections KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Page 12 ~ Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 g. Spur SubdvisionNo. 4 - Mr. Vic Tyler Bill Brighton brough up the plat for the above subdivision stating that. the plat was now updated showing the buildings on the lots that were subdivided, this being at the request of the Commission at the last meeting. Concilman Wise stated that the utilities (water & sewer) should be shown on the plat. No action necessary 7. PLANNING Any items such as Section 36 lands will be held until after the Land Manager has a chance to look over the subjects. 8. OTHER BUSINESS a. City Council Report b. Borough Planning Report No word as yet as to who has been chosen as representative to the Borough c. City Administration Report Bill Brighton stated that he had some good news and bad news. The Land Manager, Jeff Labahn was introduced with a run down on Jeff's many qualifications. Regarding the public hearing, the City is guilty of not having ordinances ready. It has been the policy of the City to gain residents and the Council voted to spend 4 million dollars to put in water & sewer to do just that. The question right now is whether that property will become owner occupied or rental occupied. Kenai must meet the housing need and not drive tax payers out of town to Soldotna. Councilman Wise spoke of the variance and stated that the problem is not the variance but the plat. He stated a need to propose language changes to the code for townhouses and condominiums and a look at where you plan to put them, weave them in with homes or in a specific zone. The zoning code is out of date and needs revisions and suggests the commission get with Jeff and go to work on it. 10. COMMISSION QUESTIONS & COMMENTS Commissioner Smalley stated he had some general concerns of the Commission, prior to January and this is the change in membership and how it affects retraining someone specifically to the needs of KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting, January 26, 1983 Page 13 the City and of the Commission. Commissioner Smalley stated he was not questioning or challenging the authority of Council in making changes, but perhaps they might want to talk to the Commission before changes are made. There being no precendent for that but it could be a consideration. What Commissioner Smalley stated he was referring to was the removal of a past commissioner. Councilman Wise stated that he was not removed, Commissioner Smalley said that he did not resign, Councilman Wise stated that no one revoked his appointment. He went on to state that the Council has, on occasion been surprised at nominations, i.e. that many of the Council persons did not know the name or names submitted. At the last meeting several names were submitted and the Council was asked to write names down from a list and those with the highest number were placed on the Commission. Commissioner Smalley asked "is Jack Castimore a commissioner or is he not since his term did not expire." Councilman Wise stated that "his term has not expired and he has not been releived, the Council having taken no action. Bill Brighton stated that if this is the case then the commission has one too many members. The only element not discussed was that Jack Castimore could not make a meeting for 4 months and the code says that if a commissioner misses 3 meetings he's automatically off the commission and this may have been what the Mayor was operating from. Councilman Wise stated that there was no declaration of vacancy before the Council in a public meeting or private. Commissioner Smalley asked what had happened to the sign code ordinance that had been proposed, and. too when can the commission get together with Jeff and the attorney on these townhouse ordinances. Bill Brighton explained that on the sign code, they came in rough form and the Council instructed that they go back to become a votable document and a meeting was to be set up with the commission and attorney and as yet no instructions have come as to when the meeting will take place. Commissioner Monfor commented about her enthusiasm for the way the city is growing, but is disappointed at the way the weird sizes and shapes of lots are coming in. "Now that we have a land manager it would be hoped that he would also be a land planner and would go into these subdivisions with some forethought as to planning." Councilman Wise agreed. Commissioner Roth suggested some plan be devised to keep the public hearings from turning into what could be termed debates and keeping the time limits down and order. This will be looked into. Planning & Zoning Meeting Jan. 26, 1983 Minutes r 1. Roll Call ~' ~O~ / ~~ 1-a Installation of New Memhers ~" . 1-b Election of Officers -~` MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to nominate Lee Lewis as chairman. MOTION: Hal Smalley closed the nominations.. Lew Lewis was elected. MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Phil Bryson, to nominate Bob Roth as vice chairman. MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to close the nominations. Vote passed. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2-a Variance Request - Horizon View Townhomes in Redoubt Terrace S/D ~~6 Phil Bryson asked to abstain, becuase of a conflict of interest. PUBLIC COMMENT: a. Linda Munsterman b. Dick Gagnon c. Troy Castimore d. Sally Bailie e. Ron Martin f. Stan Lesbrook g. Anita Necessary h. Dick Carignan i. Glen Jackson j. Vic Tyler k. Bernie Doyle 1. John Wise m. Haward Hackney MOTION: To postpone till City Attorney reviews. Bob Roth seconded. MOTION, Amendment: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to postpone till Feb. 9 . Amendment and Motion as amended passed. 3 AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION: C.N.B. postponed .to Feb. 9, seconded by Hal Smalley. MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, o approve the agenda. Both motions passsed. 4. MINUTES, 12-8-82 ~ Check voting on page 2 as indicated. MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to approve the minutes. 3 ___--- Motion passed by unanimous consent. 5. OLD BUSINESS 5-a Koa Circle MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to approve the plat. 5-b Jenkins S.D MOTION: r Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to approve with reg. findings. MOTION: Phil Brys'pn moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to take the plat. MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Ozzie Osborne, for the City Attorney contact either the surveyor or subdivider to work our reasonable consideration. 5-c & 5-d Porter's Acres & White Country S/D MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley for approval of both. MOTION, Withdrawal: Phil Bryson withdrew his motion, with consent of second. MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Ozzie Osborne, to approve Porter's Acres with additional items, temporary cul-de-sac. f MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to approve White Country S/D plat. 5-e Barrie S/D MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to approve the plat. 5-f Spruce Grove S/D ~~2, re-plat of lot 5 MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Phil Bryson, to approve the plat. 5-g Peck S/D MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Chris Martin, to approve the plat. MOTION, postpone: ~ Phil. Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to table with Administration approval. 5-h Anderson S/D MOTION: Phil. Bryson moved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to approve the plat with regs. 5-i Meeks S/D MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to accept the plat with regs. 5-j Golden North Estates ____-- MOTION: Phil Bryson maved, seconded by Hal Smalley, to approve the plat. 5-k Hinkle-Murray S/D MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Ozzie Osborne, to approve the plat. 5-1 Walker S/D MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Bob Roth, to approve the: plat. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6-a Setback Violation, Thompson Park S/D, Ron Hobbs MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Ozzie Osborne, to direct Hobbs to file variance. MOTION: Hal Smalley moved, seconded by Phil Bryson, to send memo to PN requesting possibility of no building permit till as-built is done. 6-d Lot 3-A Spur S/D ~~4, Request fos Exception from 3-1 Limitation MOTION: Phil Bryson moved, seconded by Bob Roth, for approval. 6-e Prelim. Plat, Central Hts. S/D, Ist Addtn. MOTION:. Phil Bryson moved to approve prelim. plat, added - be sure to put justification of 50' right-of-way. Motion passed. 6-f Changing & Establishing Street Names within City PUBLIC 1-FE-A-R-N~tf-: C~ ,•~.. w~ ~.~,.`~ '. 1. Vic Tyler 7. PLANNING. None 8. .OTHER BUSINESS 8-a City Council Report None 8-b Borough Planning Report None 8-c City Administration Report City Manager Brighton. John Wise Hal Smalley Chris Monfor 10. COMMISSION QUESTIONS & COMMENTS Phil Bryson asked that Section 36 be agenda item on next meeting. ADJOURNMENT. . ,~-- ~~'1_ 3 ;'~ ~!' ~ y Roll Call ,, _. ~~~ `.~ Chairman ~~ ~ ~~ 3ack ('~cri L~ ` ti f~ ~ ~ ~l 1 ~ ~.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ L ' ~ ~I -more Vice Chairman , ~ ~. ~~ ~, ', ~ Mary Quesnel -_-_..- __ ___._.- .__.. ..___. ,~ Lee Lewis ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ `~ ~ ~ }t ~ I ' > err-~au~er ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ f ~ \J ~ I ~ ~ ~~ __ ,_ ,,) ~ Hal Smalley ~•,~ A~ ~ ~~ ~ \~ '~ ~~ ~ ' r /} Bob Roth hey. ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ '~% '~~ ~ ~I ~ \ '~ '+~, 1 ~ ;j i \~ ~ ~(~ / Ex-Officio ' : ~ ,.;~ ~r `~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ r~ ~ p /' ~ ~1 w ,j. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~; ~~, ~' ~~ ~,~ ~~ $~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ , ~` ~~ ,~ ~~ ~.___ '~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~