Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-04-25 P&Z MinutesKENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman Mork Session Begins at 6:00 p.m. Items for the Mork Session are: Townhouse Ordinance and Sign Code PLEASE BE SURE TO BRING YOUR SIGN COOS DRAFT COPY AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. AGENDA APPROVAL 3. PER5ONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD a. Jill Burnett -Lot 2, Block I, CIIAP S/D - Lease Assignment and Amendment 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PZ84-27: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 5 Townhouse Units on Portion Gov't Lot 64, NW1/4 SW1/4, Sec 31 T6N, R11W, S.M. (Plat for Woodbriar 5/D under item 7-1) b. PZ84-29: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 6 Townhouse Units an Lots 3,4, & 5 Meeks 5/D (Evergreen Grove Add.)Sec 31, T6N, R11W, S.M. (Plat for Evergreen .Add under item 7-2) c. PZ84-31: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 12 Townhouse Units in Donnybrook S/D - Shamrock Circle Add. Sec 34, T6N, R11W, S.M. (Plat for Shamrock Circle Add under item 7-3) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of April 11, 1984 (minutes are in rough draft form and unedited - content for your review - spelling & punctuation will be corrected before filing) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 25, 1984 Page 2 6. OLD BUSINESS a. Hanson Townhouse Development PZ84-17-A Revised Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 10 Townhouse Units on Gov't Lot 115, Sec 34, T6N, R11W, S.M. - Walter Church PZ84-18-A Revised Preliminary Plat: Hanson S/D b. Request for Reconsideration: Lease Application - Tract B Gusty S/D No. 2 - Jesse & Catherine Wade c. Kenai Plaza Plot Plan - Amended - Tracts A, B, & C, Sprucewood Glen S/D 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Preliminary Plat PZ84-28: Jess S/D - to be called Woodbriar S/D (PZ84-27 - Jess or Woodbriar Townhouses) b. Preliminary Piat PZ84-30: Resub. Lots 3,4,&5 Meeks S/D - Evergreen Add. (PZ84-29 - Evergreen Townhouses) c. Preliminary Plat PZ84-32: Resub. Lots 1-7, Donnybrook S/D, Shamrock Circle Add. (PZ84-31 - Shamrock Circle Townhouses) d. Preliminary Plat PZ84-33: Cindy-Crabugh S/D e. Preliminary Plat PZ84-34: Seaman S/D f. Lease Application: Lot 9, Etolin S/D, Third Add. - Sheet Metal Shop - Bill Miller g. Request to Purchase City Lands: Lots 1 - 16, Lawton Acres S/D h. Request to Purchase City Lands: Gov't Lot 50, Sec 34, T6N, R11W, S.M. i. Aproval of Minimum Lot Area - Gill Street Apartments - Gov't Lot 136, Sec 31, T6N, R11W, S.M. 8. PLANNING a. Discussion: Landscaping Ordinance - Commercial Properties b. Community Center Committee - Resolution 84-1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 25, 1984 Page 3 9. REPORTS a. City Council b. Borough Planning Commission c. City Administration 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 11. INFORMATTON ITEMS a. City Council Agenda 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS ~ QUESTIONS 13. ADJOURNMENT KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 Kenai City Hall Lee Lewis, Chairman 1. ROLL CALL All Commissioners Present 2. AGENDA APPROVAL Item 8-b moved to 3-b Agenda approved with the change 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD a. Jill Burnett - Lot 2, Block 1, CIIAP S/D - Lease Assignment and Amendment Jill Burnett explained that the present lessee is Ron Dolchok who originally had a lease approved for an office building. Since that time, Ms. Burnett would like to acquire the property to use for support parking for her office building on an adjacent lot. Chairman Lewis asked if the parking Iot would be constructed prior to the office building, Ms. Burnett answered that she "could not promise a total completion until August 1985" since the development was contingent upon availability of materials. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved to approve the lease amendment for development from office building to parking, seconded by Commissioner Osborne VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. b. Community Center Committee - Resolution 64-1 Mr. Ron Malston, representing the Committee, explained that the resolution was to set aside 5 acres of land to be used for the site of the proposed Community Center. Previously, a parcel of land had been set aside for 8 years for this purpose, but had been Bald to the Postal Service, therefore creating the need for another site. The resolution also requests covenants which would restrict development within the parameters to comparable enterprises such as the Community Center, Senior Center, and a park like setting, Chairman Lewis asked if the Pioneer Home was still proposed for the area, answer yes. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 Page 2 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to recommend adoption of Council Resolution 84-1, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. DOTE: Motion passed unanimously. The Commission voiced support of the concept, especially the covenants which would protect the type of development. 4. PU$LIC HEARINGS a. PZ84-27: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 5 Townhouse Units on Portion of Gov't Lot 64, NW1/4 SWl/4, Sec 31, T6N, R11W, S.M. Jess Hall introduced his application and explained that the location will be 3rd and Haller streets and that there will be 5 different plans to break the line effect. Tony Doyle came forward to comment on the density which would be created by the influx of families moving into so many units. Part of the attraction of the area is the minimal density. If these lots total 7200 sq. ft. then there would be no problem but years later down the line there will be a drastic problem. Clint Hall introduced large framed pictures which are examples of the homes they will be building. Mr. Hall explained that he has travelled throughout the States and have found these designs to be very pleasing, utilizing maximum advantage of space avail- able. Mr. Hall stated that these units are nice enough that they will probably be building these styles whether as duplexes for rental or for individual purchase. The concept of using less land to build more of a house is a sound one and these designs show that, otherwise to make a large enough house on a single lot the garage will have to be eliminated. The utilities and streets will definitely handle the traffic flow, and there are several access points to major traffic arteries. Commissioner Zubeck asked what the approximately cost of these duplexes would be, Mr. Hall answered about $72,000. Mr. Doyle stated that, personally, he would rather see single family houses with no garage at the time of construction, and build a garage later when affordable. Commissioner Zubeck asked Mr. Hall if the concept of zero lot line duplexes had been approved by the FHA, no one knew for sure. Mr. Hall stated that at one time FHA would loan on the plans for construction, but now they will finance on an already built home. PLANNING COMMISSION ~} April 25, 1984 Page 3 Mr. Cliff Baker of Dowling-Rice reitterated that Mr. Hall stated that whether or not the CUP is approved he will build duplexes any way, will this be according to the zoning? Answer yes. Mr. Dave Schwartz, property owner in the area is concerned that "once townhouses get started, what is there to stop them going in the entire city. The Halls stated that they would use them as rental units if not approved for zero lot line duplexes; the papers are now showing high rates of vacancy. What most people come to Alaska for is 'elbow room' and not have to sit on neighbor's lap". Mrs. Betty Warren owns property in the area and is a former realtor. Mrs. Warren states that she has no objection townhouses as long as the community is accepting and is very familiar with them in that her daughter has 2 in California. The only complaint that she has heard about zero lot line duplexes is that the setbacks are not usually far enough from the street. Mrs. Warren felt that Kenai is growing and will continue to grow and that this is one viable alternative and can enhance the area. people who own their own property usually take better care then a renter and is more likely to landscape. Mr. Bill Johnson stated that he is not opposed. Chairman Lewis turned discussion to the Commission. Mr. Labahn stated that basically, there is no problem, however the units shown on lots 1 & 2 are too close. While it meets minimum requirements it is pushing it. Commissioner Zubeck felt there is a problem with square footage. What a duplex is virtually, is a single house on a single lot which would require 7200 sq. ft. The only difference with a zero lot line is that you've taken that same building and placed it on a lot line so why not still require a total of 7200 sq. ft. alleviating the crowding situation. Commissioner Carignan held reservations on the concept. The City is slow to react; it is not reflected in the comprehensive plan; and the basic idea of townhouses is 4 or 5 in a row not the zero split seen on every one of these submitted. Commissioner Carignan stated he was reluctant to vote on any of these until we see where we are going on the entire concept. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved approval of PZ84-27 with the stipulation that the required minimum lot width be 45', seconded by Commissioner Zubeck PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 Page 4 VOTE: Commissioner Carignan stated that what the Commission is doing is "putting out brush fires" until a look at the entire concept is done. Motion passed with Chairman Lewis, Commissioners Bryson, Oleson, Smalley, and Zubeck voting yes, Commissioners Carignan and Osborne voting no. b. PZ84-29: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 6 Townhouse Units on Lots 3,4, & 5 Meeks S/D (Evergreen Grove Add.) Chairman Lewis opened comments to the public. Mr. Clint Hall came forward. Chairman Lewis asked if his prior comments and designs concerning Mr. Jess Hall's townhouses hold for this CUP also, answer yes. Mr. Hall apologized saying that he did not mean his statement concerning going ahead and building the duplexes to be derrogatory, that what he meant was that the units are nice enough he intended at least one unit for himself. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Smalley, to recommend approval of PZ64-29. There appears to be a problem with consistency on lot width. Mr. Labahn noted that lots 1 & 2 are setback 23' which does not conform to the zoning which is 25'. MOTION AMENDMENT; Commissioner Bryson moved to require minimum lot width of 45', seconded by Commissioner Smalley. What this will do is to allow 2 units with 1 single family dwelling. VOTE AMENDMENT: Motion passed unanimously VOTE MAIN MOTION: Motion passed with Chairman Lewis, Commissioners Bryson Osborne, Smalley, and Zubeck voting yes; Commissioner Carignan voting no. NOTE: Commissioner Oleson gone for break 1 PLANNING COMMISSION ~ April 25, 1984 Page 5 c. PZ84-31: Conditional Use Permit far Construction of l2 _ Townhouse Units in Donnybrook S/D - Shamrock Circle Add Chairman Lewis entered a petition for the record from 25 property owners in the area objecting to the proposed development. Chairman Lewis opened comments to the public. Mr. Tony Doyle came forward and explained that from Linwood to Swires all the homes in the area are single family with the smallest lot being 10,000 sq. ft. and the residents are very concerned about the density created by 14 units on 2.5 acres. "We are appealing to the developer to leave the area either single families or lower density. There is slot of land elsewhere, we are not strapped for land so why the crowding?" Dave Schwartz owns the lot on the corner of E. Aliak and Swires and voiced concern that 14 units are going on a small lot. If 14 units go on this lot, then 14 on the adjacent lot which is a portion of this one, that will put too many people in the area. The roads are a mess. Last year during breakup all that could ~ use that road were the geese which swam in the lake in the middle of the road. The road is so narrow that only one car can use it at a time, with one car having to pull off (ditches on both sides) to let another pass or back up. This development-will bring in 110 cars and any number of 3 wheelers plus bikes and kids playing in the already impassable streets. Perhaps the best solution in this situation would be to came up with a place that could handle these large groupings of people. "You are hard pressed to put this amount of density in such a small area, is this what you really want?" Mr. Kenneth Cox is a resident of E. Aliak and objects for all the same comments as made by Mr. Doyle. The concept of the zero lot lines is not what appears to be the original intention; the development of the roads is not up to grade to take the type of population density proposed; came here to have home of my own away from overcrowding. Charles Woodcock stated that he is the man with the geese that swim in "Aliak pond". Mr. Woodcock had received a letter notifying him of the change in zoning and understood that the purpose of the rezoning was to keep the cost of the water & sewer down. Realizing that apartments can come into the area without having to go through the public hearing process, would hope the developer would keep in mind the feelings and concerns of the neighbors and the impact on the area. PLANNING COMMISSION ~ April 25, 1984 Page 6 Mr. Clint Hall stated that the Halls were sympathetic and agree but some areas of Aliak will go farm home. One of the reasons for going zero lot line design is the denial of money for farm homes but now the cost of property and construction is going up. If we are going to have to build for cast we are going to slot of trouble to make nice homes. Mr. Doyle stated that farm homes are alright but the trouble comes with 14 units on 2 acres. "Don't want to see that happen to Kenai". Linda Gibbs asked if Mr. Hall intended to bulldoze down the trees an example being Walker lane, Mr. Hall said that he was not the builder on that project. Ms. Gibbs stated that she felt the trees should be left since they are so hard to grow back and they take so long. Commissioner Zubeck stated that E. Aliak definitely is not acceptable to take the type of project being proposed. Commissioner Smalley stated that the City needs to redefine the areas that this type of development would enhance without jeopardizing the health, safety, and welfare of the residents. Mr. Labahn noted that the width of the lots have been reduced and no longer meet the code, some being in the neighborhood of 20'. There are units which face E. Aliak and have an 18' setback, they need to face the cul-de-sac and the required 25' setback. Commissioner Bryson noted the public comments on the zero lot line proposals and that comments always fail short on public input. If people are interested in supporting zoning then it should be done at the time the ordinance is put together. There is a definite lack of input at the planning level. Commissioner Zubeck noted that under 21.76.155b topography is indicated as an item for consideration. This and other applications do not address it and would like to see a full drainage plan for this project which would suit the area. Councilman Wise noted that since this is still a new concept; a detailed plan is the only way for the Cammission and the public to go to be able to see the plan. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved to adopt PZ84-31, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. MOTION WITHDRAWN MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved to postpone PZ84-31 until the conditions of 21.76.155b are met,. more information is received on site plan showing lot width, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. ~ PLANNING COMMISSION j April 25, 1984 Page 7 VOTE: Motion passed unanimously 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTE5 of April 11, 1984 NOTE: Minutes submitted in rough draft form Commissioner Bryson asked secretary to check tape on item on page 7 the word "inappropriate" and on page 20, the word strongly may have been wrongly. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of the minutes as changed or corrected, seconded by Commissioner Carignan. VOTE: There were no objections 6. OLD BUSINESS a. Hanson Townhouse Development ~ PZ84-17A - Revised Conditional Use Permit for Construction of 10 Townhouse Units on Gov't Lot 115, Section 34 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to reconsider the resolution, seconded by Commissioner Smalley VOTE: There were no objections The Commission and Mr. Labahn reviewed the changes. MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Smalley moved, seconded by Commissioner Bryson to approve PZ84-17A with the required minimum lot size of 45', eliminate the flag lot, incorporate the now vacant footage into the lots along Dolly Varden for the 45' frontage and further at the time of application for building permit, they be required to build one half of James Street. Walter Church came forward to address his proposal stating that he proposes to build low income housing that are quality. Single family dwellings are small. These units would upgrade the area, there are now trailers in the area. Mr. John Williams came forward to address other substandard housing in the area. PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 Page 8 Commissioner Carignan asked if the Commission could put public notice that we will not look at any more of this type of development until we can look at the whole concept. Commissioner Smalley stated that the construction season is in full swing and we would take a great deal of heat. Councilman Wise stated that because the zoning code is in the process of coming to the city, any amendments would be too late to get to the Borough to be effective. PZ84-18A - Preliminary Plat for Hanson S/D MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved to approve the revised plat in conformance with the standards used in PZ84-17A, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. VOTE: Motion passed with Chairman Lewis, Commissioners Bryson Oleson, Osborne, and Smalley voting yes; Commissioners Carignan and Zubeck voting no. Commissioner Carignan stated that if the Commission were going to require 45' minimum lots then we need to be consistent. Commissioner Smalley noted that the ordinance was never meant to be for zero lot line duplexes, as it stands for the traditional townhouse concept it is adequate. Jeff Labahn agreed and suggested a work session to attempt to come up with a policy. b. Request for Reconsideration: Lease Application - Tract B Gusty S/D No. 2 - Jesse & Catherine Wade Mr. Wise is representing the applicant and explained that the intent is to have private land purviewed since the developer does not have a plan in mind for the time being. Prefer not to have a time frame because the client does not have a clear intent as yet. There are no utilities to the tract therefore it is undevelopable. Mr. Wise stated that he did have a site plan for parking but it is meaningless at this point. NOTE: Original motion from the meeting of May 11, 1983 stated "give conditional approval of the Wade lease pending receipt of a site plan and more information on the time of construction". out a MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to reconsider, seconded by Commissioner 0leson ~ PLANNING COMMISSION ~ April 2S, 19B4 Page 9 VOTE: Jeff Labahn stated that without a site or development plan the land could sit there forever. Mr. Wise stated that if the lease is approved, they will pursue purchase dependent upon intent of FAA on release. If the client has a lease at the time of consideration for availability for sale it will weigh heavier. Mr. Labahn stated that the concern is that nothing would happen on the property for a long length of time, and although utilities are not to the property, it is available to the private owner to the south. Commissioner Zubeck asked what was the difficulty about submitting a site plan in that we require this of anyone who comes before this body. Motion failed with Chairman Lewis and Commissioners, Carignan, Osborne, Smalley, and Zubeck; Commissioners Bryson, and Oleson voting yes. c. Kenai Plaza Plot Plan - Amended - Tracts A, B, & C, Sprucewood Glen S/D Sam McLane of McLane Associates came forward to represent Mr. Lowry and Mr. Partee. Mr. McLane detailed the plat as submitted the day of the meeting which shows an increased distance from Walker and 2 access points into the mall from Walker through the buffer. There will be a fence to divide the residential section from the rear of the mall section, the fence is to be wood and as indicated in the covenants, is to be maintained by the developer and will meet all building and fire codes. Jeff Labahn voiced concerns about the rear lot line which abuts the residential portion; an amendment will be necessary to the Partee lease; the fence itself; extending Tern across the buffer; the northerly access; and the rezoning of the residential portion. Commissioner Smalley stated that the Commission had specifically requested the Urban Residential zoning, the applicant now wants General Commercial, am getting confusing with all the changes. The Commission discussed access points in the entire area agreeing that another access from Walker Lane would be beneficial to the residents of Central Heights and users of the mall, the only item to really watch would be any attempt to create an access, either vehicular or pedestrian from the rear of the mall onto Sprucewood Road. This would always remain forbidden. The Commission agreed that the plat was appropriate as long as the plat for F-1 return, and that the language of the covenants would be worked out administratively. ~ PLANNING COMMISSION w April 25, 1964 Page 10 MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to reconsider the plat for Sprucewood Glen No 2, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously MOTION AMENDMENT: Commissioner Bryson moved approval of Sprucewood Glen No 2, as submitted this date (4/25/84)be substituted for prior plat of the same name, seconded by Commissioner Osborne. Commissioner Smalley noted that previously the Commission had voted to retain the rear lot line and if approved in this manner, the stipulation would be removed. Jeff Labahn agreed, saying that lots b-1 and c-1 would be fronting on Sprucewood Road and there is no justification for moving the lot line and further stated that he didn't. feel all information was there yet. VOTE AMENDMENT: Motion passed unanimously MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved to have administration initiate rezoning Tract F-l, Lots 6-10 Block 2, Lots 1-5 Block 1, Spruce- wood Glen No. 2 from General Commercial to Urban Residential, seconded by Commissioner Carignan. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved, seconded by Commissioner Osborne, to set a public hearing for second week in May far input from residents of Walker Lane reference the two access points proposed from Walker Lane to the mall. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. 7. NEW BUSINESS N©TE: There are several changes in the agenda -items a~i11 be numbered as they appear on the agenda but taken in the order of business. PLANNING COMMISSION "~ April 25, 1964 PaslelL __ __ f. Lease Application: Lot 9, Etolin S/D, Third Add. - Sheet Metal Shop - Bill Miller The Commission reviewed the applications and plans submitted. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved, seconded by Commissioner Oleson approval of lease application for referenced property. UOTE: Motion approved unanimously i. Approval of Minimum Lot Area - Gill Street Apts Mr. John Williams explained that each unit will be 3,675 square feet which is well above the standard allowed in RS zones. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan maved approval of site plan as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Bryson. VOTE: ~ There were no objections a. Preliminary Plat PZ84-26:Jess S!D - to be called Woodbriar MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved approval of PZ64-26 with correction of negative findings, incorporating staff comments, with adaption of CUP, {i.e. to be consistent with CUP findings} seconded by Commissioner Osborne. VOTE: Motion passed with Chairman Lewis, Commissioners Bryson, Oleson, Smalley, voting yes; Commissioners Carignan, Osborne, and Zubeck voting no. b. Preliminary Plat PZ84-30: Resub. lots 3,4,&5, Meeks S/D - Evergreen Add. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved approval of PZ64-30 with correction of negative findings, incorporation of staff comments, consistent with CUP findings, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTE: Motion passed with Chairman Lewis, Commissioners Bryson, Oleson, Smalley, and Zubeck voting yes; Commissioner Carignan and Osborne voting no. PLANNING COMMISSION ~ April 25, 1984 -Page 12 _ _ _ - - - - c. Preliminary Plat PZ84-32; Resub. Lots 1-7, Donnybrook S/D - Shamrock Circle Add This item was reviewed under 4-c CUP for townhouses. That item was postponed. MOTION: Commission Srysan moved to postpone PZ84-32, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTE: There were no objections d. Preliminary Plat PZ84-33: Cindy-Crabaugh S/D This plat realigns the two subdivisions slightly to allow for a carport constructed within the ROW. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson moved, seconded by Commissioner Carignan, approval of PZ84-33 with correction of negative findings, ~ incorporation of staff comments. VOTE: There were no objections e. Preliminary Plat PZ84-34: Seaman S/D This plat subdivides a small portion of a government lot. MOTION: Commissioner Smalley moved, seconded by Commissioner Carignan, approval of PZ84-34. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. g.T Request to Purchase City. Lands: Lots 1-16, Lawton Acres Interest has been expressed in a portion of the preplatted but not yet filed Lawton Acres. Chairman Lewis asked if any plans have been discussed with what would be intended for this portion, Mr. Labahn answered no. It is currently zoned residential. Commissioner Smalley noted that Parks & Recreation Commission had requested this entire strip be held for recreational use and before considering further, should keep this in mind. With so much development going on, should consider keeping strips like these as a buffer. It would be highly detrimental to the City to PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 1984 - - - Page i3 - - - - - - cut up this strip. The Commission further discussed the problems with utilities run to the lots and cutting up the paving on Lawton. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved to have this issue reviewed by other City agencies and brought back before the Commission, seconded by Commissioner Smalley. VOTE: There were no objections h. Request to Purchase City Lands: Gov't Lot 50~ Sec 34 The City had purchased this land same time ago, and to date there is no record as to why the purchase was made or an intent far use. A request to consider opening the property to purchase has been received. MOTION: Commissioner Carignan moved, seconded by Commissioner Smalley to 7 postpone decision on this issue until other City agencies can be contacted. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. 8. PLANNING a. Discussion: Landscaping Ordinance - Commercial Properties Councilman Wise presented a document of landscaping ordinances from an east coast city which could be used as a guideline for writing a Kenai ordinance. While these are much more stringent, the content could be considered. The Commission agreed that with the construction season fast coming, this body needs to do something that will have some teeth in it. 9. REPORTS a. City Council Councilman Wise referred the Commission to the agenda provided. b. Borough Planning Commissioner Bryson reported that the Borough Planners l recommended approval of the zoning powers to the City of Kenai. The item next goes before the Borough Assembly. PLANNING COMMISSION t April 25, 1984 _ - - - - Page 14 - - - c. City Administration Mr. Labahn reported that the name of Section 36 will be Oena'ina Point Estates and the streets will be named after birds, but in the local native language. IO. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 11. INFORMATION ITEMS a. Council Agenda 12. COMMI5SION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Commissioner Smalley stated that he had been contacted by Mr. Calvin Quandt and asked why the City was picking on him about junk with all the junk around the rest of the City. Mr. Partee has been notified that he must submit a landscaping ~ plan for review at the next meeting which would be May 9th. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:35 P.M. The next regular meeting will be Mednesday, May 9, 1984 at 7:00 P.M. Janet Loper Planning Secretary Roll Call PLANNING & ZONING CO .~II SION V~ w c ~~ V ~ ~~ 'U P ~' ~~ ~ Chairman •Lee Lewis ~ ~~ ~ _. ~ - ~ , ~ ~ ~~ - Phil Bryson ~ \~ Richard Carri no ~ ~ ( ~ \ ~ ~ J ~ ~I g n ~~ Bob Oleson ~ ~ `~' ,ti 4~ ~ L~ Ozzie Osborne ~ ~ ~ y ~ J` I ~ ~~ ~> Hal Smalley ~ I ~I ~- ~ ~/ ~~ Bill Zube~~-- _ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ l ~. TO DO / ~ ~r ~ ~+ ~.-,~ ~~ ~~d` ~~- ~-~p -~1-'~:2 f -~'7C--' ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~~ /l / ~' ~ ~