HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-26 P&Z MinutesKENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986 - 7:00 p.m.
Kenai City Hall
Lee Lewis, Chairman
Mork Session at 6:00 PM on Site Plan Ordinance, Ttmmsite Zone, Zero Lot
Line Ordinance, anti Revisions to the Kenai Municipal toning Code. PLEASE
BE SURZ' TO BRING YQIR CG~IE' BA?KS M.ITN Y!C!.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Resolution PZ86-12: Rezoning Lands within the HEM Area to RS-2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of March 12, 1986
Available at the meeting
6. OLD BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Vacation of Two 50' ROW's within R.M. Thompson 5/D.
b. Preliminary Plat PZ86-10: Etolin S/D Replat Lats 5 & 7
c. Preliminary Plat PZ86-11; Three Wood S/D
(arrived toa late far staff review)
8. PLANNING
9. REPORTS
a. City Council
b. Borough Planning
c. City Administration
10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
11. TNFORMATION ITEMS
Council Agenda
Borough Planning Agenda
I2. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS
13. ADJOURNMENT
.~ KENAI PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986 - 7:00 p.m.
Kenai City Hail
Lee Lewis, Chairman
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Lewis, Bryson, Carignan, Oleson, Osborne, Smalley,
Absent: Zubeck, unexcused
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Agenda approved as submitted
3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
None
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Resolution PZ86-12: Rezoning Lands within the HEM Area to RS-2
Mrs. Jackie Russell came forward and spoke for the rezoning stating
that from a realtors point of view, when 4 plexes are built in an
area, the single family units are harder to sell. There are many
absentee owners who invest in the property but do not live in the area
and are not aware of the impact with the higher density. Mrs.
Russell owns a 2 acre parcel which has been subdivided into smaller
lots.
Peggy White, also an owner of property within the area, spoke against
the rezoning stating that the neighborhood has been established as a
multi-family dwelling area and is against farm homes which can be
worse looking than 4 plexes. Mrs. White has a tri-plex at the current
time and has plans for more. Mrs. White stated that she is not
against a compromise with perhaps a buffer between the areas since
development of greater density appears to be nearer the elementary
school.
Jim Trudeau, owner of Iots between 4th and 5th Street spoke against
the rezoning because he had purchased his Iots as an investment
planning to construct multi-family units on all lots. The rezoning
would cut his investment in half. Mr. Trudeau stated that the sewer &
water that were put in were done so For multi-family units. Mr.
Trudeau feels that there are more multi-family units than single
family units and further that the trailers and farm homes are more
degrading than the 4 plexes.
Duncan Wilsack, lives outside the City limits but owns a 4 Alex in the
area and spoke against the rezoning. Mr. Wilsack feels that anyone who
builds a single family dwelling should check into zoning first so they
know 4 plexes are allowed.
~ PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986
Page 2
Al Poore, owner of property in the area spoke against for the reasons
stated prior by the other owners.
Ray Barrett (Nate: Mr. Barrett stated that he sold his property to the
Whites and does not indicate if he awns property in the area or lives
in the area) Mr. Barrett stated that he sold the property to the
Whites for the purpose of multi-family units "because the City of
Kenai planned that the area be multi-units. This is not an area that
is going to support $150,000 homes and should be used for multi-family
units".
Oliver Amend, property owner and resident of the area, spoke for the
rezoning stating that there are plenty of multi-family units and
firmly believes that there should not be any more than there are there
right now. Mr. Amend spoke with a contractor who built in the area
who stated that if the same number of 4 plexes were built in his
neighborhood he would be doing the same thing. Mr. Amend explained
that he felt the people speaking were not clear about the rezoning in
that the City is not rezoning the area, it is because of a petition of
the property owners in the area. Mr. Amend stated that he has lived
in this area for l0 years and is a builder and would like to attract
the long term kind of people that are better for a stable economy,
these are people who invest in the long term, a number of years and
will generate the more stable dollar. The float plane basin is close
to this area making it an area for growth and I think if these people
would back off and think about it for a bit, I think they would agree
that homes da not have to be farm homes, but for the long run are more
stable and draw a more stable population base. The petition tells me
that there are more people that do not want multi-family units than
there are here tonight. for the mast part, from what these people
have said, they don't live in the area, just own property and don't
have the same concerns as the residents.
Paula Trudeau spoke against the rezoning and stated that they were
assessed for water & sewer and stated that it is for multi-dwellings.
Do we get reimbursed if the property is rezoned?
Tim White, husband of Peggy White, stated that he apposed the rezoning
and pointed out to the Commission that most of the signatures were of
persons living from 4th south. "I think the whole thing is
ludicrous". Mr. White stated that he is against the lot size of 7,200
sq. ft. as "he has been told by a bank that the only way he can
finance is to split the lot and two buildings on the lot and end up
with 5,000 sq. ft."
MOTION:
Commissioner Smalley moved to approve Resolution PZ86-12, rezoning
,~ referenced lands to RS2, seconded by Commissioner Osborne
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986
Page 3
VOTE:
Commissioner Bryson reviewed the figures of property owners and number
of parcels an the petition. Planning Specialist Loper explained that
510 of the property owners are required to sign an initiating
petition. Commissioner Smalley restated the question asking, "if a
person owns 8 lots is that not in effect 8 votes not 1". Rnswer, no as
the initiating petition is only asking for a percentage of persons who
hold property. Commissioner Smaller asked if that meant, "if these
individuals awned these lots and placed them in a different family
name they could have had 8 votes. In all true aspects of all Iand
represented only 31°o signed the petition". Commissioner Bryson asked
if there was an opinion from the Attorney. Answer, this was set up at
the time of transfer of zoning to initiate zoning. Commissioner Bryson
stated that he would not be in favor of this with those figures
without an attorney's opinion. Commissioner Bryson stated that he was
not aware that that area was assessed, Councilman Wise answered that
only Eadies Way was assessed because it was not an established street
at the time of the district or even a paper plat. Commissioner Bryson
asked for an explanation of notification for the public. Planning
Specialist Loper explained the procedure. The Commission and
individuals from the audience continued the discussion of the voting.
Councilman Wise advised the Commission to read the cads under
amendments and it was adopted by the Council, Commissioner Smalley
stated that it is challengable. Planning Specialist Loper was asked
to read the portion of the code pertaining to the ownership.
Commissioner Carignan stated that he has always been in support of
trying to maintain a residential nature if there is one existing, I
have heard many of the property owners that are interested in rezoning
are in the area of 3rd, Gth, and 5th Avenues. I would be in favor of
restructuring of this rezoning map. Commissioner Smalley stated that
if here were petitioners here I would have the encouragement to vote
in favor of it, however, based upon the testimony here tonight I
intent to vote against it. Despite what is in our code I have a
problem with our voting paver.
Motion failed unanimously.
Commissioner Carignan commented that he would advocate the petitioner
restructure the size of the area and resubmit before the Council
meets. Councilman Wise stated that action reference the rezoning will
go to the Council in this form and will be adopted in ordinance form
for introduction. At the time of introduction there is no comment. To
oppose this your option is to approach your Council individually
either by writing or personal contact because at the time of
introduction the ordinance can be amended or defeated. Any member of
the Council can offer an amendment or have it struck from the consent
1 agenda. If it fails an introduction it is dead.
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986
Page 4
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTE5 of March 12, 19$6
Minutes were approved as submitted
6. OLD BUSINESS
None
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Vacation of Two 50' ROW's within R.M. Thompson S/D.
This vacation request came the day of the packet and had no prior
staff review. Since then, Borough and City staff have reviewed the
request and find many questions. The Landscaping code addresses a
buffer between two different Iand uses which the ROW's provide,
however, one individual owns both parcels in question. The Borough has
agreed that if the Planning Commission decides to allow the vacation
to be sure to add a disclaimer that if at any time that rear parcel is
developed, the appropriate buffer will be put back. The other
possibility would be to rezone which eliminates the need far a buffer
altogether. Councilman Wise asked for the justification of the
vacation, there is no indication of what the property owner intends.
Councilman Wise pointed out that this also vacates a portion of a
section line vacation.
Commissioner Bryson asked for the zoning of Tract B, answer RR. And
the zoning of Tract A, answer IL. The Commission discussed the plat.
According to the Borough, a preliminary only exists. Mr. George
Bradford stated that several of the very old plats are assumed to be
final and the streets dedicated. Commissioner Bryson stated that
under that criteria if you vacate the ROW's adjoining Tract C you
would be landlocking those lower parcels. George Bradford suggested
the Commission would be safe if they placed a stipulation that Tract C
reverts to acreage so there is no doubt.
MOTION:
Commissioner Smalley moved to table this issue until the property
owners are contacted to came before the Commission and identify use
and intent, seconded by Commissioner Osborne.
VOTE:
Motion passed unanimously
b. Preliminary Plat PZ86-10: Etolin S/D Reelat Lots 5 & 7
The Commission noted several discrepancies on the front plate of the
plat. The Borough has been made aware and the staff comments make
note of the fact. This plat is for the Carr's Mall expansion.
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1986
Page 5
MOTION:
Commissioner Smalley moved approval of Resolution PZ86-10 with
incorporation of ALL staff comments, seconded by Commissioner Carignan
VOTE:
Motion passed unanimously
c. Preliminary Plat PZ86-11: Three Wood S/D
This is a standard subdivision in the Candlelight-Linwood area.
MOTION:
Commissioner Smalley moved approval of Resolution PZ86-11, seconded by
Commissioner Osborne
VOTE:
Motion passed unanimously
8. PLANNING
Commissioner Smalley asked that the Commission set another work
a session prior to the next meeting to get rolling on these ordinance
revisions as summer is nearly upon us.
The Commission further discussed the voting procedures when
considering rezoning and directed Planning Specialist Loper obtain an
opinion from the attorney.
9. REPORTS
a. City Council
None
b. Borough Planning
None
c. City Administration
None
10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
None
~ PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 198b
Page 6
11. INFORMATION ITEMS
Council Agenda
Borough Planning Agenda
No comments or questions
12. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS
None
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The next
regular meeting of the Commission is Wednesday, April 9th with a work
session prior to the meeting at 6:00 PM,
Janet Loper
Planning Specialist
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Roll
Call
//%//
Chairman
•Lee Lewis
N
~ -f
yl.
"Phil Bryson
Richard
Carrignen
\I
1
Bob Oleson ~ \
I
Ozzie Osborne ~,
Hal Smalley ~ \
Bill Zubek
TO DO