Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-04-27 P&Z Minutes~, KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 198$ - 7:00 PM Council Chambers Hal Smalley, Chairman AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Tidelands Lease Application: Northland Services, Inc. - 1.5 Miles East of the Mouth of the Kenai River 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of April 13, 1988 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Vacation: Easements & ROW's Within Tracts D-1 - D-7, Dena'Ina Point Estates (Section 36) - Royce Roberts 8. PLANNING 9. REPORTS a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. City Administration 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 11. INFORMATION ITEMS a. Council Agenda b. Borough Agenda 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS 13. ADJOURNMENT KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1987 - 7:00 PM Council Chambers Hal Smalley, Chairman (Portions of the following minutes are verbatim) 1. ROLL CALL Present: Smalley, Bryson, Church, Nault Absent: Brown, O'Reilly (excused) 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Agenda approved as submitted 3. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Tidelands Lease Application: Northland Services, Inc. - 1.5 Miles East of the Mouth of the Kenai River Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, explained that this is back before the Commission as a formal lease application. The original discussion was concerning whether or not to make the land available for lease. In accordance with the code we are now holding public hearings both at the Planning level and Harbor Commission level. We have received no comment. Jan Molders is here from Dowl Engineers to answer any questions. A reminder, you are to determine whether the contemplated use falls within that permitted under the zoning ordinance and that is your roll in this instance. Chairman Smalley opened the issue to the public. There were none, Chairman Smalley brought the issue back to the Commission for discussion. Commissioner Bryson: In looking at our staff report it makes reference to the Corps Permit being a plat, I think that is inappropriate wording. The summary tidelands plat number, Cook Inlet number 435, that's merely a Corps application. There is no plat that exists. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, no there is no formal plat of the leased area, the applicant filled that out. The code goes on to state appraisal and surveying is required. I'm not familiar with surveying tidelands, I'm no certain that is really necessary. It has not been accomplished. Commissioner Bryson: when this was before us before, we approved the leasing of tidelands in general, I think that was the thing PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 2 before us. There were several comments made about how this parcel is situated in relation to the channel and after the meeting, the next day I went and plotted that up versus some air photos of the river and it occupies a good portion of the channel that's used for navigation. And I was wondering if, if we don't have the review authority on that aspect of it, who is doing it. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, the Harbor Commission. The Harbor Commission is looking at it Monday. On that portion of that. Jan might be able to answer that too, I know the Corps of Engineers, according to Jan, approved their permit so that they evidently don't have a problem with it. Commissioner Bryson, what permit is that. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, I'll let Jan answer. Commissioner Bryson, this same tract? Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, the permit for their facility. Commissioner Bryson, yea but at this point, they're wharf plan isn't proposed to extend to the limit of their lease, its along the shoreline and what activities are they proposing within this lease that wouldn't have been addressed? Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, I'll let Jan answer. Jan Molders: the extent of the lease parcel boundary does exceed what we're proposing, I think the dock itself extends maybe 200' out. The applicant I guess was a little uncertain at the time we put that together as to how far his facility was going to extend and its not necessary probably to have lease parcel itself be quite as extensive as its shown and we wouldn't have any problem with it being pulled back somewhat. Our main. concern is that the facility as proposed is entirely encompassed within that area. And the Corps has indicated to us, as has the state that with our revised our application they are just days away from issuing a permit for this project. Commissioner Bryson: has the Corps established a wharf line along there that they, were they will approve structures that are ..... Jan Molders: I'm not familiar with the term wharf line but what they have approved is the structure that we're proposing, the floating ramp and dock facility. And if it varies substantially from that design their permit would not be valid. Commissioner Bryson: I don't have a, a great, well I have less concern I guess if the proposed tract were more in conformance with the adjacent leases rather than extending, you know half to two thirds across the channel. Jan Molders, that was not our intent. Commissioner Bryson: are there any existing mooring leases in this area? Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, held by the City? Commissioner Bryson, well, by individuals, like Corps permit. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, I don't know. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, this could be modified back then to say 300'? Jan Molders, oh yea. Commissioner Bryson, the Harbor Commission will probably consider that anyway but...... PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 3 Jan Molders, part of that came out of the irregularness of the coast line at that point, we're just wanting to make sure based on where we were ..... Commissioner Bryson, from the initial boundary from where that was put in, in the downstream boundary it sticks out about twice as far as the adjacent lease. Another third of the upstream {inaudible). I don't know to what extent they obstruct or could in the even they were utilized. But there (inaudible) public hearing on this or is just a review. Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, no a public hearing on Monday. Commissioner Bryson, and our purpose is to review consistency with .... Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, with the zoning. Chairman Smalley, that basically its a use that falls within that zone. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson, I move to find the proposed use consistent with the zoning, or is found to be consistent with the zoning, seconded by Commissioner Nault. Chairman Smalley, ok its moved and seconded that this use, Northland Service Inc, application for tidelands is within confinements of the lease, any discussion? Or within the zoning. Question. VOTE: Motion passes unanimously. Commissioner Bryson, Leon are you with the Harbdr Commission? Leon Quesnel, yes. Commissioner Bryson, I wonder if I could mention again two things I just brought up. One is the proposed tract that is to be, lease, or platted or leased. It sticks out considerably beyond the adjacent approved uses. Or they may not be City plats, I don't know, but certainly they've been approved in some relationship to the channel and everything else and I wonder if....in looking at their photos it appears as though the proposed lease occupied a considerable portion of the channel to that area. Leon Quesnel: it appears to yes, we'll be taking a closer look tomorrow ... Monday. In the meantime I will talk with city administration on it to get {inaudible). Administrative Assistant Gerstlauer, Phil, we do have copies of those tidelands surveys upstairs, the ones that flank either side of this so we can look at how far those go. You'd feel more comfortable with it if it was more in line with .... Commissioner Bryson, well I'd like it to be reviewed (inaudible). The shorelines might have changed 50' from when the tideland surveys were done also. Chairman Smalley, ok, it stands approved. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of April 13, 1988 Minutes were approved as submitted. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 4 1 6. OLD BUSINESS None 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Vacation: Easements & ROW's Within Tracts D-1 - D-7, Dena'Ina Point Estates (Section 36) - Royce Roberts Planning Specialist Loper introduced the issue with a short background on the first phase. This Commission needs to pass a recommendation on to the Council and the Council in turn will recommend to the Borough. Chairman Smalley: Is this the one that came to us when there was concern about the removal of the buffer. Planning Specialist Loper, I believe so. Commissioner Bryson, what was this? Chairman Smalley, they wanted to take the screening from the highway off and there was concern about the screening from this end. The application I think removes it. It makes a portion of it commercial and a portion of it residential. Commissioner Bryson, question, the initial submittal to us as regards the resubdivision, or rezoning of this area indicated that it was going to be a mixed commercial residential use, yet this indicates that they are proposing to rezone it all commercial. Planning Specialist Loper, I hadn't noticed that. Commissioner Bryson, its in our summery. Planning Specialist Loper, where did you find that? I see. That's the old one, do you notice the date? It is April 17, 1987. That is the backup for when they first came to us. Is that what you are referring to? Chairman Smalley: that piece of property to the south of the, which is here, right? Now this is where the church is, on this one, and in reading through it, I understand that the screening will be removed completely? Planning Specialist Loper, the application speaks of removing screening easements. Commissioner Bryson, same comment, or same subject, the April 8, 1988 indicates that phase I which is the rezoning is from RS to CG. Chairman Smalley, the whole thing to general commercial. Commissioner Bryson, I haven't been able to find a description of phase I yet. Or a portion. {large portion inaudible due to papers shuffling) Planning Specialist Loper, of course the rezoning was based upon the submittal of a final plat. Commissioner Bryson, we're proposing to rezone this but which area are we rezoning. Planning Specialist Loper, if you remember back, we've had two instances where we've had a rezoning based on the submittal of a final plat, one was Parson, and one was this one, with no concrete plat to look at to say which is going to be residential and which is commercial. The way we did it was say, just the way it says in the description from suburban residential to general commercial based on the submittal of a final plat which we approved. Commissioner Bryson, but we had a schedule before us which showed PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 5 us what they were doing. Planning Specialist Loper, yes. That doesn't mean that's what they are going to final. Commissioner Bryson, well if it varies significantly from that I would reject it. Planning Specialist Loper, right, and we won't have that until after these vacations come through. They are giving it to us in one package, we're getting it by phases. Chairman Smalley: according to the map here it talks about the easements being vacated, the screening easements being vacated, it looks like the screening easements are only the highway. Commissioner Church, well that's where they want it commercial and naturally you don't want any screening. Chairman Smalley, I know but see my concern is on the south end next to the church there, you know about removing screening there. Its difficult to determine what is a, you know I can see the right-of-way easement... (papers being shuffled - partially inaudible) Chairman Smalley, .... and the map here doesn't show it being taken out. So is this easement going to be taken out or not. Planning Specialist Loper, I would suggest if that's what you want, that you specifically state that on the western end of it you want it retained so you get what you want. Commissioner Nault, it doesn't show a screening easement on the north being taken out either. Chairman Smalley, yea I know ..., and depending upon who has this piece that's going to be decided in. I do have a concern about this piece, You know they don't show it going. But then I think, I agree, I think something needs to be said about that. Commissioner Nault: (inaudible) tracts in residential? Chairman Smalley, c-4? That shows it being commercial I think. Commissioner Church, which one is residential then? Commissioner Nault, c-3? Chairman Smalley, thats a d. Commissioner Church, what I want to know is where is the residential part of this. I understand they want all of this commercial, of course its on the highway. Planning Specialist Loper, this is the way it used to look (loud noises - partially inaudible). Chairman Smalley, this is from the original file that shows ... Commissioner Church, so they want all of this to be commercial? And this then to be residential? (loud noises and several persons speaking at once - mostly inaudible) Commissioner Church, ...all of this. Chairman Smalley, it looks like they're rezoning the whole thing. Commissioner Church, to the commercial and this .... Chairman Smalley, I mean if they're vacating these easements .... Commissioner Church, ...all the way to the bluff. Chairman Smalley, I mean this is easement this isn't screening. This is easement I'm assuming. It would be nice if somebody were here to explain their .... so this is the original one submitted. That's D5. Commissioner Nault, so its a tract all by itself. Chairman Smalley, now this is the original one filed, here it shows tract 5 over here is tract 7 and its speaks D1 through 7. And then the application requests .... from Rs to .... I'd feel more comfortable personally having somebody here to speak towards it. Or can you understand it Phil. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 6 j Commissioner Bryson, although this isn't a rezoning document it certainly contents ... what's proposed is the rezoning, I think it ought to be clarified before we ..... make a reference to page one being rezoning from RS to CG I would assume that's in part and phase two is the vacation of the rights-of-way, right-of-ways and easements and that's what they're doing now. Chairman Smalley, see, it says also vacate screening easements adjacent to Kenai Spur Highway within Tracts D1 and D7. And D7 ... are just these ... Commissioner Church, he's referring back to this original here. D1 and D7 but does it include this one here on the side? Chairman Smalley, no, nor does it include anything on the .... Commissioner Church, its just on the Spur. Chairman Smalley, that's what I thought, this map shows just this piece here, that's being, the screening removed. Commissioner Bryson, as far as the vacation tool I see no problem with what they're proposing, however, I think we, anything we do should be contingent upon conformance with, general conformance with their original layout as far as rezoning is concerned. Or request to have it modified. Commissioner Church, the original intent of this tract though was residential, is that correct? Answer from several voices, yes. Commissioner Church, and what impact would that be if this is changed to commercial all the way to the bluff? As far as we're concerned. That's a question I have. Chairman Smalley, I think it has the potential impact on anybody that would want to build a house in there. It would make the property probably a little bit less in value.. Commissioner Church, that's true. If they wanted to build over here and they have, whatever, a boat coming up next to them for instance .... Chairman Smalley: what are the wishes of the Commission. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson, I move to recommend approval of the proposed vacation of easements and rights-of-way within Tracts D1 through D7, Dena'Ina Point Estates, as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Church. Chairman Smalley: there has been a motion to approved the vacation of rights-of-way within Tracts Dl through D7, Dena'Ina Point Estates, discussion. Commissioner Bryson: just a, I'd like to underline a point here that, this has been, was initially approved on the concept of a rezoning a portion of this parcel and that, they should either request a modification if their proposals are different of don't conform to that. That's not a motion, just a ... they should be made aware of. Chairman Smalley: as was stated, I have a concern as far as what, you know, if there isn't clarification and it goes commercial clear to the bluff, even the portion if its fronting the highway, I wonder what kind of impact that's going to have on the property out there as far as its value. Residential. Because I think at PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 7 `~ one time we, our intent was to keep the commercial within, within the inner city. And now we're looking at a piece, or an ordinance, or request to extend it. Councilman Measles: initially, as I recall, it was also the intent commercial property would be, if needed, would be across the highway. Chairman Smalley, across the highway! Councilman Measles, the section 36 areas the other side of the highway. The question maybe Phil can answer, if this is approved, will all of the water, sewer, engineering have to be redone for the rest of the area out there. Commissioner Bryson, they were proposing to do that as part of their rework of that subdivision, yes. Councilman Measles, it was just for these parcels ... Commissioner Bryson, yes. They may be trying to conform more to the crossings that exist out there, but all their interior design work is lost. That just .... Councilman Measles, that's just in these areas, what about the other sections .... Commissioner Bryson, that'1 .. as far as the trunk line that will utilize that to the same degree I think. Commissioner Bryson, I assume they're trying to get these roads closer to what exist out there, I don't know. Chairman Smalley, I can appreciate someone trying to do something with the property out there, but again, if there's a potential for it to have a severe impact on the other remaining properties I think its something the city really needs to take a look at. Before they say go. Commissioner Church, and that would come in } through phase three here right? Chairman Smalley, yes. Commissioner Nault, when did phase one go on was that a year ago? Commissioner Church, yes, about then. Chairman Smalley, to a degree that's probably what would be done tonight if memory serves me right. That's what we're being asked to do, actually one and two. Commissioner Church, we're being asked to rezone it? Chairman Smalley, it has been rezoned. Planning Specialist Loper, a copy of the ordinance is in your packet. Commissioner Nault, this has been rezoned completely? Planning Specialist Loper, yes, based upon the filing of a final plat that you approve. Commissioner Church, yes we did that last year. Commissioner Bryson, ok, its basically in conformance with that large layout you passed out. Planning Specialist Loper, yes, this is what you based your approval on. Commissioner Nault, in their initial request a year ago, did that show rezoning a part of it and leaving a part of it residential? Commissioner Church, yes. Chairman Smalley, rezoning tracts D1 through D7, the whole thing. That's what this says. Planning Specialist Loper, it was done that way because there is no other legal description. It had to be based on what exists not on what is proposed because there is no final plat. Commissioner Bryson, based on the concept. Its a strange way ... at what point do they identify which zone is which. Planning Specialist Loper, that's what this Commission decided on a year ago, to go ahead and do the rezoning based on exhibit B a concept map. Commissioner Church, right, that's what's on page one of this ordinance. Chairman Smalley, I don't remember us doing that but obviously we did. Commissioner Church, I remember doing it. Commissioner Bryson, so it was contingent PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 8 ~~ upon the submittal of the plat and the platting has never been done. So the rezoning hasn't taken place. Planning Specialist Loper, right, and they told us that the platting would not be done until phase three after all the vacations and everything else has been done. Commissioner Church, what if this all goes through and all this has been approved and then Council feels its not the best benefit for everybody, then can we turn it all down and they would have to start all over again. I mean all three things have to be approved in order, right? Planning Specialist Loper, everything is going to hinge on that final plat, making sure that it matches everything they've submitted all along. Commissioner Church, I don't remember then wanting it commercial all the way to the bluff, I really don't. I remember this part here still being residential. Planning Specialist Loper, what you are looking at is the original and only copy of what they submitted at the first meeting. Commissioner Church, I guess I didn't study it well enough. Chairman Smalley, according to this letter the vacation request has been approved subject to the conditions in the attached memos, has this been done too? Planning Specialist Loper, those are Borough minutes, yes. Chairman Smalley, oh, ok. Well at this point in time what can be done to, or can anything be done I guess, to ensure that the whole piece is going to go commercial. Commissioner Church, it says Tract 1 through and whatever. Chairman Smalley, the wording says D1 through D7 on the ordinance. Planning Specialist Loper, it was. done that way originally because there was no way to define..... Chairman Smalley, I have a question, do, I'm not trying to postpone this but can we get access to our minutes where we discussed this? Planning Specialist Loper, sure. Chairman Smalley, and see what the discussion was. 10 Minute Recess MOTION: Commissioner Bryson, I would move to postpone action on this item until our next regularly scheduled meeting, at which time the staff gather information and minutes applicable to this subject, seconded by Commissioner Nault. Planning Specialist Loper, to clarify, you are requesting Council and Borough to postpone action? Councilman Measles, the motion you need is to recommend to Council and the Borough to postpone action. MOTION WITHDRAWAL: Commissioner Bryson, ok, with consent of second I would withdraw my motion and resubmit, second approved. MOTION: Commissioner Bryson, I move to recommend to the City Council and Borough to withhold action on this item until we gather additional information, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 9 Councilman Measles, the Borough has already acted so its effective in 30 days so perhaps you should ask for an extension of time for it to be effective at the Borough. You need to ask for an additional 30 days or whatever. Commissioner Bryson, they are incapable of extending it. Planning Specialist Loper, why would they be incapable of extending it? Commissioner Bryson, that may be a statutory thing. Councilman Measles, well if it is you just need to veto it. And then they can start over. Commissioner Nault, Council has 30 days to act on it within 30 days from April 18th. Commissioner Bryson, they'd have, your right, they'd have to request, or they'd have to veto it is what they'd have to do. Chairman Smalley, yea, it would be Council, should be Council's action. Commissioner Bryson, both we and the Council will meet before that period. Councilman Measles, yes Council meets on the 18th but your recommendation {inaudible) but that's the same night and the deadline. MOTION WITHDRAWAL: Commissioner Bryson withdrew his motion MOTION: Commissioner Bryson, I move to request a two week extension to the May 18th deadline Chairman Smalley, now this is in addition to your original? You could just put an and in it and add it to the original motion, and to request a two week extension on the May 18th date. Commissioner Bryson, all right. Chairman Smalley, is there a second. Commissioner Church, would you read it again please. Commissioner Nault, we lost it. Planning Specialist Loper, it now reads; "move to recommend to the City Council and the Borough to withhold action on this item and to request a two week extension on the May 18th deadline." Councilman Measles, the next Borough Assembly meeting will be on the first of June. Do you want to specify a date. Commissioner Bryson, is it the Borough Assembly that has to reject it within 30 days. Unknown. Chairman Smalley, is there a second, Commissioner Nault, I'll second it. Chairman Smalley, discussion. This does not pertain to the motion, but I'm looking at the names of the streets that were so carefully chosen. When they redo the street alignment, when and if they do are they still going to be maintaining these names? Planning Specialist Loper, I guess we'll know that when the plat comes through. Commissioner Bryson, the City can establish the names of the tracts. Planning Specialist Loper, anything in plat form needs to come back through you. Chairman Smalley, further discussion. Commissioner Bryson, I got a question, is this completely jumbled up, what do you think's needed Ray. Councilman Measles, we just need to get some j objection in before the 18th in some fashion, either a request for an extension or a veto. Commissioner Bryson, probably correct PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 10 that if you do something the night of the 18th you can't submit it in to the Borough the day of the 18th. Councilman Measles, I would assume that since the Borough set that 18th that it was because the Borough's having their meeting that night so we (inaudible) Borough Assembly then could retract their actions or ... Commissioner Nault, it just says no vetos received within the 30 day period. Chairman Smalley, question on the motion. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously Chairman Smalley, I have a, I don't know I guess its more of a statement, I think it is probably appropriate at this time, when, I think when a Commission or when people see that a mistake perhaps has been done, I'm not to sure if its going to reflect badly on our record to go back and say whoa, wait a minute, we made a mistake and to correct that mistake rather than to allow it to continue on and cause, potentially cause some severe ramifications economically in that area. Now I really think we made a mistake in approving of a rezone, I really do. Commissioner Church, well it was contingent upon the filing of a final plat. Councilman Measles, I think the basic mistake was in approving the rezoning of the plan period because of what the plat looked like to rezone that area to commercial, in my opinion is a mistake. Chairman Smalley, and when is it appropriate that we set back and say whoa, wait a minute. You know if we have a body, as a body do, I mean, so we look like fools, my God, I mean you know if we made the terrible mistake. Planning Specialist Loper, perhaps rather then retract a rezoning the time to start looking at it is when you get a full package. And thus far you've had a part of a package. What you could do is turn down the vacation and say you want to see the entire package at one time, would that be a better option Ray? Chairman Smalley, we did that somewhere else and look what we ended up with. Commissioner Church, I believe that's what confused us, its because of the phases. Chairman Smalley, bits and pieces. Commissioner Church, you know we're sitting back here and we want to see the whole picture, we just saw the first picture. Councilman Measles, one problem with that approach would be, if the intent is at some point to retract everything that's been done to this point, if you approach it in that manner then you're telling them go ahead, spend the money, do a final plat, do all this work, bring it back to us, and if the intent now is to undo all of that then there's no need in them going any further with their expenditures. Planning Specialist Loper, yes, that is looking at it in a negative manner. Councilman Measles, right, gather everything, if the rezoning was approved pending approval of a final plat, ok, there's no stipulations there as to what that final plat really needs to look like, so essentially, if they bring in a final plat that meets the requirements of the general commercial zone, I think you have a hard time then rezoning it back to residential based on that final plat. Chairman Smalley, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 11 after they've gone through all that ..... Councilman Measles, that would really be hard to do and would make both the Commission and the Council look a lot more foolish than if everybody agrees now, hey a mistake was made, lets undo it, stop what you're doing out there. Chairman Smalley, and that can happen between now and our dead- lines that we've set up basically. Is there any way that we can bounce this off the feelings of Council and get some feedback from them. 'Cause if we're going to stop it it needs to be done or if there's going to be some change and zone back... Planning Specialist Loper, if I may make a suggestion, the Council is about done with the budget sessions, Ray do you think the Council would be open to a work session with the Commission and perhaps the developer? Councilman Measles, I agree, the last session will be Monday. Councilman Measles and the Commission agreed on Thursday, May 5th for a date for a joint work session. Material will be gathered and presented to Council. 8. PLANNING None 9. REPORTS a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. City Administration 10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD 11. INFORMATION ITEMS a. Council Agenda b. Borough Agenda 12. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Chairman Smalley, we need to get ready for the summer sessions. Anyone planning on vacationing needs to let Janet know. Chairman Smalley asked for details on the activities at the Foster site including Mr. Brown's property. Planning Specialist Loper answered that the city engineer had looked at the site and are monitoring activity. Chairman Smalley stated that he had been told that there was some construction going on into the evening down there and it stopped about 9 that evening. By the time I got home the hole was dug and nothing was moving but it did appear to be a strip of land going down to the river and that is on the same PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 27, 1988 Page 12 parcel and same section, between Brown's and Fosters where they were proposing a launching facility. Commissioner Nault asked if the Commission has a new member to replace Dottie, answer no. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Janet A. Loper Planning Specialist PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE: (~~,~~~ Roll ~~ Call ~~~ (1/ Od~iI. ~E S~Yley ~P1`~~I ~r~san ~flog~ia C~wrch ,cQa.~ce-_ l~ ~i~e fair P~.t 1~aaal.t TU ~ LIST: NOTES : .: