Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-05-28 P&Z MinutesCITY OF KENAI PLANNING AN:D ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** 1 KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS May 28, 1997 - 7:00 p.m. http://www. Kenai.net/city 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 14, 1997 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ97-23-Landscape Site Plan Review-Economic Development Center, Mile 14.5 Kenai Spur Highway (Tract C, Radar Subdivision, Replat No. 1) b. Lease Application-Hertzl Benyamini Development, L.P. or Nominee, Lot 2-A, Baron ~ Park Subdivision No. 6 c. City Land Sale-Ten Lots in Inlet Woods Subdivision 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. Review of Conditional Use Permit-PZ96-35-Paint Ball Playing Field, Tract A, Block 1, Bridge Road Subdivision No. 2 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 1 1. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Memo regarding Airport Commission Public Hearing of June 12, 1997 b. Notice of KPB Borough Plat Committee of May 12, 1997 c. KPB "Quarterly Report of Kenai Economic Indicators" 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda May 28.doc CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 28, 1997 ~ * *MINUTES* 1. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Teresa Werner-Quade, Ron Goecke, Barb Nord, Karen Mahurin, Michael Christian Members Absent: None Others Present: Councilman Smalley, City Engineer Jack La Shot, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: GOECKE MOVED TO APPROVE AGENDA AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MOTION SECONDED BY MAHURIN. AGENDA APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 14, 1997 WERNER-QUADE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES OF MAY 14, 1997. GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MINUTES APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ97-23-Landscape Site Plan Review-Economic Development Center, Mile 14.5 Kenai Spur Highway (Tract C, Radar Subdivision, Replat No. 1) GOECKE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PZ97-23 LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN. MOTION SECONDED BY CHRISTIAN. La Shot noted no additional staff comments. Mahurin asked if she was missing something or if they are not landscaping. Glick noted that the code requires they submit a plan because they are planning and addition. Mahurin advised she was aware of that but doesn't see any landscaping. Glick agreed. Minutes May 28.doc Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 Minutes May 28, 1997 Bryson noted that staff made comment on two areas, the parking and a comment concerning the landscaping. Bryson stated he thought that this didn't need to be a construction drawing and that they could show the parking without much ado. Bryson added that whether landscaping was to be done as part of a specific contract they could show it as part of the site plan. Bryson stated he thought that would be reasonable. Goecke noted concern with the way the plan was presented. Goecke noted that everyone else who has come before the Commission has shown what they were going to do for parking. Goecke noted they haven't done this. Goecke stated others have shown where they will plant and plow adding he didn't see any of that. Goecke noted he would have a hard time voting on this unless he could be convinced otherwise. Nord noted she has the same concerns adding there is nothing to show that there is a landscape/site plan. Bryson asked if it might be appropriate to postpone action until parking and landscaping addressed. Mahurin stated she was opposed to postponing if it doesn't come in a format that they can take action on to postpone. Mahurin stated they need to say no to this plan and they need to submit a new site plan. Mahurin stated she felt a postponement means waiting to take action on what is before the commission tonight. Bryson noted the recommendation of the city engineer is that the commission should determine if the proposed plan meets the intent of the code. Bryson stated he cannot see defeating this because it is the same item when reinitiated. Bryson stated he felt they should request that they provide the information as required. Werner-Quade stated she doesn't feel comfortable with the review and the city engineer is saying they do not plan any landscaping. Werner-Quade stated that they say, "although we do not note snow storage on the plan, there is abundant available." Werner-Quade stated they don't seem to have adequate parking. Werner-Quade advised that given the recommendation that the commission should determine if the plan meets the intent, stated she personally doesn't feel it does. Glick asked which way the Commission wanted to proceed, to table and ask for more information or to vote it down. Christian asked if there was a motion to postpone. Glick stated no. BRYSON MOVED TO POSTPONE UNTIL RECEIVING APPROPRIATE PARKING FOR THE DESIGNATED USE, UNTIL THE DEVELOPER PROVIDES LANDSCAPING FOR REVIEW PURPOSES, AND SNOW REMOVAL AREAS. Goecke asked if it would be out of line to ask Bryson why he would rather postpone than vote on the plan. Glick stated it could be asked as motion not seconded. Bryson responded that if they defeat it, what is the Commission requesting. Bryson noted all he Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 Minutes May 28, 1997 j wanted was for them to provide the designated parking and if they have an area they propose to landscape, to put it in the general plan. Bryson added that presumably snow storage would be addressed at that time. Goecke asked if it could be included in the motion that they come back to the Commission with a definitive landscape and site plan review. Glick stated the motion states they will postpone it until they do, or won't take it up. MOTION SECONDED BY GOECKE. Bryson asked how many parking spots the business is short. La Shot stated he would have the Building Inspector delineate how many spaces are required when it comes back to the Commission. La Shot noted there is a lot of space available. Kebschull advised she had discussed the plan with the Building Inspector and noted that he wanted the Commission to be aware that the parking area is actually a gravel lot. Kebschull added that it is difficult to ascertain parking required because of the proposed incubator businesses and not knowing what type of business they will be. Kebschull noted the area to the north on the drawing is all gravel and will be available for parking. Bryson asked if this a matter of the architect not being able to define the use so they cannot make an estimate. La Shot stated he wasn't sure adding he thought he would be at the meeting to answer questions. La Shot noted he didn't have a problem postponing action. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN NO CHRISTIAN NO GLICK YES PASSED 5-2.. POSTPONED. b. Lease Application-Hertzl Benyamini Development, L.P. or Nominee, Lot 2-A, Baron Park Subdivision No. 6 CHRISTIAN RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST FOR LEASE APPLICATION. MOTION SECONDED BY MAHURIN. La Shot stated the question at this time is if the use complies with the zoning. La Shot noted that the developers are hesitant to give out any more information. La Shot stated the intended use is fine for that zone. La Shot stated that in the future he will have additional comments depending on what the developers bring forward. Bryson clarified there was no description other than commercial, retail. La Shot advised none. Bryson noted this seems somewhat more conceptual rather than a specific lease application. Bryson asked if he wondered if conceptually a finding that acommercial/retail development in this are would be appropriate rather than a specific lease. Bryson stated he would defer ~ to staff on this. Glick asked if they conceptually agree that this type use is in agreement with zone rather than approve the lease. La Shot asked if they wanted more information adding he didn't know if they would provide more. La Shot reiterated that the question is if the use if proper for the zone. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 May 28, 1997 Bryson asked if there was a withdrawal of the prior motion he would consider a more general recommendation. Goecke noted the only thing administration wants to know is if the Commission thinks the city should lease this property to a retail vender. Goecke added it doesn't make any difference what type of retail business it is, just if the Commission thinks it is a good spot for a business. La Shot stated the nature of these things is that the developer has other plans that are not being divulged at this time. La Shot advised the administration will fashion a lease so that the property is not tied up too long if it doesn't develop. La Shot noted that if it things do develop, alandscape/site plan will be brought forward. Goecke stated the developer would have to do something fairly soon, noting the construction startup date provided by the developer. La Shot stated there is no guarantee as to how bonafide this application is. La Shot noted that anyone can come forward with an application but it is up to administration to make sure they do something within a specified time frame. Christian stated his concern that this is a large chunk of land and they may go in and clear and grave- it up not knowing how long it would be left like that. Christian stated they have no way of knowing how long it will be that way. Goecke stated it is already gravel. Christian stated he thought that was the Baron Park along the airport that was gravel. Smalley noted it is right across from K-Mart. La Shot noted this parcel is fully treed. La Shot stated the gravel pad is Baron Park No. 3. Christian stated he would hate to see this approved unless there is a proposal that they will be building as soon as they could. Christian commented he would hate to see another gravel pit. Smalley noted that Mr. Goecke's discussion was correct and the Commission is being asked if the city should enter into a lease agreement with a retailer to develop a business that is appropriate for the area. Smalley noted the developer will have to come back with a plan before they do anything with the property. Mahurin asked if it is appropriate for the lease agreement to stipulate that there will not be clearing before the city is aware and there is a bonfire plan. La Shot noted that he believes it would be an appropriate to make that recommendation to council, no clearing take place without a bonafide plan. Glick asked Councilman Smalley if he felt the council would approve of that recommendation and Smalley advised yes. Glick noted they would need a motion to amend the motion. CHRISTIAN AMENDED THE MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL NOT ALLOW CLEARING OF THE LAND UNTIL SPECIFIC PLANS ARE SUBMITTED BY THE LESSEE. ~ GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION. Bryson stated he feels it still misses the point that conceptually they presumably agree that the area is appropriate for retail development. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 May 28, 1997 CHRISTIAN WITHDRAW THE AMENDMENT UNTIL A MORE SPECIFIC AMENDMENT SUGGESTED. BRYSON PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO REPLACE ORIGINAL MOTION IN FULL TO THE EFFECT THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS THE PROPOSED PARCEL APPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL/COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY CONSIDER ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT FOR LEASE WITH THE APPLICANT. MAHURIN SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. Glick explained the motion replaces original motion. MAHURIN AMENDED MOTION TO ADD THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE LEASE HAS LANGUAGE STIPULATING THERE WILL BE NO CLEARING OF THE PROPERTY UNTIL A BONAFIDE PLAN SUBMITTED BACK TO THE CITY. CHRISTIAN SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE ON AMENDMENT NO. 2: WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED-UNANIMOUS. VOTE ON AMENDMENT NO. 1: Glick explained that it this amendment passed it would replace the original motion. GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED-UNANIMOUS. Smalley noted that procedurally when a motion is made, it is owned by the body and it cannot be removed by the maker unless it is allowed by body. Christian stated he tried to remove the motion but was not allowed to. Bryson stated he believes that anyone on the Commission could take issue with the action and stop it, not just the maker of the motion. Smalley agreed. Bryson called for point of order advising a need to vote on the main motion as doubly amended. Glick stated he thought Bryson's motion, the way it was worded, replaced the main motion. Discussion and agreement that the Commission needed to vote to approve the motion as doubly amended. VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 Minutes May 28, 1997 j NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED-UNANIMOUS AS AMENDED. c. City Land Sale-Ten Lots in Inlet Woods Subdivision BRYSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND THE TEN INDICATED PARCELS BE ADVANCED FOR SALE. CHRISTIAN SECONDED THE MOTION. La Shot stated nothing additional unless the Commission finds any lot that will be needed for public purposes. Bryson asked if Parks and Recreation has looked at the information to evaluate if a park would be appropriate in this development. La Shot stated that to his knowledge they haven't. La Shot stated that could be a recommendation or as the back of the subdivision reviews utilities, maybe a lot in the back would be appropriate. Smalley stated that in an attempt to help bring Inlet Woods to closure, this is one of the parties to which the city is owed and these ten lots are owned by a different individual than the family who started the addition. Smalley stated the city contacted the individual and paid an amount of money for quit claim deeds on the parcels so the city doesn't have to wait ten years for clear title. Smalley stated the idea was to get building lots available this summer. Smalley added the idea of a park is a good one. Christian asked Smalley if the city is thinking in terms of a park or recreation area. Christian commented he felt the central area would be more appropriate for a park. Smalley stated the council was not thinking of a park but the plan was to get lots on the market for building. Smalley noted building is down because of the non-availability of building lots in the city. Bryson stated in looking at Attachment A, the area seen is about half of the subdivision. Bryson stated that even beyond the top of this is half way through the subdivision adding there is still lots of room for a park in the future. Smalley stated there is another 128 lots the city is soon hoping to have control over in the near future. Werner-Quade asked Smalley if the Inlet Wood situation still in litigation. Smalley stated it is with the judge right now in foreclosures and the city is trying to get him to make a ~ decision. Smalley stated they hope that the motions being filed bring resolution to it. Smalley stated that they need to be careful so that they end up with the property with title. Werner-Quade asked if the prospective buyer would be purchasing the land from the city and Smalley advised yes. Werner-Quade asked about status of water and sewer. La Shot stated all the water and sewer is included. Werner-Quade asked if this is an Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 Minutes May 28, 1997 assessment district. La Shot noted that is the reason for the litigation because of a default on the assessment and the city is basically taking the property back and putting them out for sale to recoup the cost of development. La Shot noted that in 1985 the developers approached council to provide funds in the way of a 100 percent assessment district and then the real estate market collapsed. Some lots have been built on but the majority have ended up in litigation. Werner-Quade asked if there are several different owners. Smalley stated he felt there were four owners. Bryson stated the lots have water, sewer, paved streets, curb and gutter, and utilities. Werner-Quade questioned if this was incurred at city expense and that was the basis for the litigation and was advised correct. Werner-Quade asked if it is the hopes of the city to sell off lots as they become available. Smalley stated this is one owner and that is why they are able to meet with them and deal with them. Smalley noted the owner with 128 lots will be dealt with at once adding the city's hands are tied by the judge. Smalley commented the city would liked to have had this settled years ago. VOTE: MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED-UNANIMOUS. 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. Review of Conditional Use Permit-PZ96-35-Paint Ball Playing Field, Tract A, Block 1, Bridge Road Subdivision No. 2 MAHURIN MOVED TO APPROVE RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PZ96-35. MOTION SECONDED BY BRYSON. La Shot stated nothing additional. Kebschull added nothing but noted staff has not received any public comments. Mahurin stated she remembers the applicants coming before the Commission and that they seemed to be very conscientious young. Mahurin noted she has not heard any complaints from the community adding if there was a problem, the Commission would have heard about it. Glick clarified that staff has not had any complaints throughout the year and was advised that is correct. Christian asked for clarification on location of field and was informed. Glick noted one owner was concerned when the permit was issued regarding parking but since no complaints have been received they must not be being too hard on the neighbors. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 Minutes May 28, 1997 l Werner-Quade asked if this was being reviewed because of the stipulation by the commission to review in one year. Glick advised yes. VOTE: CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED-UNANIMOUS. 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council Smalley stated there is a copy of the copy of agenda in the packet. Smalley stated that before proceeding with his report, in regards to Item 7C, he will advise council the Commission's interest that they check with Parks and Rec about parks in the subdivision ~ when the city obtains additional properties. Smalley reported, Item B-1, Mr. Phelps of the Division of Lands regarding the Kenai River Comprehensive Plan. Smalley stated they also found out they need to talk to Phelps about the BOR land near the golf course. Smalley advised that council objects to the lower river below the bring being incorporated into the plan. Smalley noted the language is far too restrictive when speaking of priority during certain time frames. Smalley noted this could be of potential impact to the canneries. Several council members suggested that the document was wonderful noting that people had worked hard on it but would like to see the line drawn at Mile 12.5. Smalley noted the city owns the bottom of the river. Smalley stated that discussion expressed concern about the Kenai River column of waterway and that the city feels that within the city they are doing a more than adequate job of regulation. Smalley noted that the city needed to get this input onto the record. Item H-10 was moved to Item B-2, this was the handicapable trail for picnicking possibly at the Municipal Park behind the National Guard. Smalley explained the. possible location and advised they would have a trail, picnic tables, etc. for people in wheel chairs. The Lyons Club will put the park in but the city would have to maintain the trail. Smalley noted the tables and cooking facilities would meet the wheel chair height. Smalley added there will be a small amount of clearing done. Under Public Hearings, 1 through 5, were approved. Item 3 involved additional moneys, around S 160,000, which will come back to the city from PERS. Smalley stated that this sets up for the people participating in the RIF. Item 6, was a resolution for funding for the Volcano Learning Center. Smalley advised the resolution is to assist them in obtaining funding and states the City supports the center. Item 7b, the Historic District Board will Planning & Zoning Commission Page 9 Minutes May 28, 1997 \i reduce the Shk'ituk't Village sign. Under Challenger Board, Bill Popp has been hired as the temporary manager of the board. Smalley advised there were only two applicants. New Business, Item 9, was approved which was for putting a batting cage at the softball fields. Smalley advised a new committee has been formed through the Chamber to look at economic development within the city and to see what types of things can be done to promote business within the city. Item 12, goals and objectives, Smalley advised the city will work without bringing in a facilitator. Mr. Hodgins has asked to join as the representative in Juneau. He will be listening so he has more information when projects are sent to Juneau. Smalley noted they will begin working on this is the near future. Item 13, developed a letter in support of funding to build a center in the city to replace the current center. Smalley noted they went into executive session to evaluate the city attorney and city clerk and they were successful evaluations. Mahurin asked about the ordinances listed. Smalley stated they are on the consent agenda for introduction. Mahurin asked Mr. Smalley to clarify Hodgins roll and Smalley advised that he will be sitting in on discussions so he will know personally what city projects involve. He will be an observer. Mahurin asked if the meetings were open to the public and advised yes. Goecke asked about promoting the city and asked who is in that group. Goecke stated there was an article in the paper designating Mr. Fabiano as the leader. Smalley stated there were several businesses from the city at the meeting. Smalley stated it was set up basically by the Chamber. Smalley drew attention to the report being prepared by the EDD of economic indicators within the city. Smalley stated this can be used to compare the city with other cities in the borough. Smalley stated in the last ten years no four plexes have been built in the city and part of it is because of the availability of building lots in the city. Goecke asked if this group is the same group that will possibly be put together by city hall and Smalley advised no. Smalley stated this group will be working in lieu of one from city hall noting it should come from the community rather than from the council. Goecke commented he had seen the list of that group and had concern that over half of those who didn't have any money invested in the city. Smalley stated this is a subcommittee of the Chamber and will report directly to the Chamber. Smalley stated that at that meeting 53000 was raised and the city has agreed to match up to 515,000 to help the group do such things as flyers, advertising. Smalley noted the budget will be brought forth for approval on June 4t''. Money being appropriated from the fund balance is about 5378,000 which is the smallest in the past several years. Christian questioned gravel being used for the handicap trails. Smalley stated that most of the wheel chairs have larger wheels or are motorized. Christian stated he felt gravel would require a lot of maintenance. Discussion about how the city will keep motorized vehicles off the trail. Mahurin asked about the budget and reduction of programs and asked if there will be a reduction of city staff. Smalley advised there will be retirements from the fire department, Planning & Zoning Commission Page 10 Minutes May 28, 1997 airport and one person has resigned. Smalley stated when positions become available they will not be automatically filled. Mahurin clarified it would be normal attrition. Werner-Quade commented regarding Mr. Smalley's comment that no building permits had been issued for four plexes in the city, that on 4/1 1 /96 a permit was issued at 309 James Street was for amulti-family four plex. Smalley stated the city has determined that that is not a four plex. Nord commented, regarding the Inlet Woods situation, stating she doesn't know how the city will proceed when they have 128 lots but speaking personally that it could be a problem to other private property owners if the city flooded the market with 128 parcels at one time. Nord stated she hoped the city will consider not doing such a thing. Smalley advised they haven't discussed a plan for disposing of these properties. Nord commented that she had been involved in the situation when it first started and they could not give them away for the assessments owned. Smalley advised he thinks there will be about 518,000 of assessments on the lots adding that the city will be responsible for the borough taxes. Nord asked if the city was prepared to take a loss and Smalley advised the city has taken a loss not counting the legal expenses. b. Borough Planning Bryson noted they held a meeting on Tuesday night in place of the Monday night meeting. Bryson drew attention to the agenda in packet. Item D was a presentation from Jim Hanson State of Alaska concerning state lease procedures and what is proposed in the inlet. Item E-1 authorized the sale of some 8000 acres of lands in North Kenai. This item was indefinitely tabled by the Borough Assembly until they receive response from the applicants. Item E-2 involved a borough ordinance regarding hearings and appeals. Bryson noted this involved the appeals board for Planning Commission action. Several modifications have been proposed among which the appeals board being able to receive new information. Bryson noted it was the opinion of the Planning Commission that it would override a hearing by the initial board if additional information could be brought in at a subsequent hearing and there would be no reason for person to go through expert witness until at the appeal board which is the assembly. Bryson advised the commission recommended not to adopt the change. Item E-3 assembly appointed a community committee that addressed halfway houses. The assembly will create another committee comprised of assembly persons and others in the community. The commission recommended that restricting residential centers to municipal properties not be approved. Under public hearings, a petition to vacate a right of way easement that provides access to Longmere Lake the commission recommended to deny the vacation. Bryson noted this ~ would cut down public access to this public lake to one point if it were approved. The remaining access is not developed which would in effect have created aland-locked public lake. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 1 Minutes May 28, 1997 There were 49 name changes in North Kenai, most notably was Arness Road. Final action of the commission was to recommend Arness Road be retained and the areas of that continuous road be changed to reflect the name Arness Road. Bryson explained the procedures the commission is going through to try to delete duplicate names. At the end of this process all of the names will go through another public comment period. After that, with ordinance approval, the borough will go to the expense of putting up signs. Bryson advised there is another geophysical exploration proposed for Cook Inlet and there were recommendations for test scheduling and locations. They recommended approval with comments. c. Administration La Shot drew attention to the information items advising the June 12t" the Airport Commission will hold a public hearing on the final Airport Master Plan. On June 1 1t" from 6 to 7 p.m. in council chambers there will be a public informational meeting concerning the design of Forest Drive. 1 1. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Memo regarding Airport Commission Public Hearing of June 12, 1997 b. Notice of KPB Borough Plat Committee of May 12, 1997 c. KPB "Quarterly Report of Kenai Economic Indicators" 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Goecke requested that Mr. Smalley make sure that Parks and Rec do a better job of keeping the dandelion problem under control this year. Goecke asked council to speak to Parks and Rec to talk about the problem. Bryson stated he wished to clarify one point from the last planning commission meeting regarding Buffalo Run Subdivision. Bryson noted that the action the borough took was contingent upon the rezoning and it was contingent upon the vacation of the easement. Smalley advised July 5t" is the planned party for the ARFF project. Smalley advised it looks like everything is a go. La Shot noted that bids will be opened on June 12t" and the ground could have been broken by then. La Shot advised that bids were received on an airport project today that were well below the engineer's estimates which may help with this project. Smalley advised that the city received word from the FAA that the animal control shelter comes within the airport funds and the city will be starting in that direction. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes 14. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:18 p.m. Re pectf Ily submitted: Ma ily Kebschull Administrative Assistant Page 12 May 28, 1997