HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-12 Planning & Zoning MinutesCITY OF KENAI
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
December 12, 2001 - 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
a. Roll Call
b. Agenda Approval
c. Consent Agenda
*All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by
the Commission and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commission Member so requests, in which case the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as
part of the General Orders.
2. *APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 2$, 2001
3. SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT:
a. Eileen Bechtol, Consultant, Kevin Waring Associates-Kenai Comprehensive Plan
Draft Chapter 2-Review of Goals and Objectives
4. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS:
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. OLD BUSINESS:
7. NEW BUSINESS:
a. *PZO1-72-Home Occupation Permit (Day Care)---For the property known as
Mornmen's Subdivision Part of Additions 1 & 2 (1111 First Street). Application
submitted by Myrna Hogg, 1111 First Street, Kenai, Alaska.
b. *PZ01-73---Home Occupatian Permit (Day Care)-For the property known as
Thompson Park Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 5 (40$5 Lupine Drive). Application submitted
by Lucinda Owens, 4085 Lupine Drive, Kenai, Alaska.
c. *PZO1-74-Home Occupation Permit {Day Care}-For the property known as Anchor
Trailer Park, Gov't Lots 27-29, 32 & 33 (11823 Kenai Spur Highway #1}. Application
submitted by Tammy Freeman, 11823 Kenai Spur Highway #1, Kenai, Alaska.
8. PENDING ITEMS:
9. CODE ENFORCEMENT:
Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda
10. REPORTS:
a. City Council
b. Borough Planning
c. Administration
11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED:
12. INFORMATION ITEMS:
a. Zoning Bulletin {11110101 & 11/2S/O1}
b. City Council Roster
c. Planning & Zoning Roster
d. KPB Piat Committee Action
13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS:
Page 2
December 12, 2001
14. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF KENAI
PLANNING 8a ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DECEMBER 12, 2001 - 7:00 P.M.
CHAIRMAN RON GOECKE, PRESIDING
MINUTES
ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
1-a. Roll Call
Chairman Goecke called the meeting to order at 7:Q0 p.m. and roll was confirmed as
follows:
Members Present: Bryson, Erwin, Goecke, Nord, Osbarne, and Aaronson
Members Absent: Glick
Others Present: City Clerk Freas, City Planner Kebschull, and Councilman
Bannock
1-b. Agenda Approval
MOTION:
Commissioner Bryson MOVED to adopt the agenda as presented, and including the
lay down material regarding Item 7c. Commissioner Osborne SECONDED the motion.
There were no objections. SO ORDERED.
1-c. Consent Agenda
MOTION:
Commissioner Osborne MOVED for approval of the consent agenda and Commissioner
Erwin SECONDED the motion.
MOTION TO AMEND:
Commissioner Bryson MOVED to remove item C-7 from the consent agenda and
Commissioner Aaronson SECONDED the rnodon.
VOTE ON AMENDMENT:
B son Yes Erwin Yes Goecke Yes
Nord Yes Osborne Yes Aaronson Yes
Glick Absent
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
VOTE ON MAIN AMENDED MOTION:
B son Yes Erwin Yes Goecke Yes
Nord Yes Osborne Yes Aaronson Yes
Glick Absent
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM 2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- November 28, 2001
ITEM 3: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT
3-a. Eileen Bechtol, Consultant, Kevin Waring Associates-Kenai
Comprehensive Plan -Draft Chapter 2-Review of Goals and Objectives
Bechtol explained the information before them was the first draft of the goals and
objectives which were developed from comments received at the town meeting on
October 27. She noted, at the town meeting, the focus groups separated into teams
and developed their lists of goals and objectives. That information was then put into
lists of goals/targets and objectives. Bechtol added, the items in the list were not
prioritized.
Bechtol reviewed the development schedule;
(1) prepare background report (approximately 95% completed and copies
would be distributed within the next two to three weeks);
(2) hold a town meeting (held on October 27 and from that the first draft of
goals & objectives before the Commission);
(3) develop specific land use plans and community facility plans after
knowing the goals and objectives are on target (specific alternatives defined and
clarified);
(4) develop an implementation plan (identifying specific projects, what
department is in charge, time frames, monetary impacts, etc.).
Bechtol advised the Commission to keep their options open and if there is something
in the first draft that is off-target, it would be the Commission's position to delete it or
if there is something which was missed, add it. Comments of the Commission,
additions/deletions, public comments, etc. will be included in the minutes of the
meeting and they will keep a record of the minutes, as well as any newspaper articles,
etc.
The Commission was asked whether they wanted to review the goals one by one and it
was decided the floor would be opened for public comments first and then address
specifics. Speakers were given three minutes in which to offer their comments.
PLANNING 8v ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 2
Ricky Gease, Executive Director, Kenai Convention & Visitor Bureau -- Stated he
and his board supported the city's comprehensive planning and especially Goal 1,
Create an attractive, vital, cutlural center, in downtown Kenai with a mix of private
and public facilities and activities to benefit residents and visitors, and 10, Expand or
provide public facilities that increase hte quality of life for Kenai's citizens and visitors.
He added, he and his Board were fully behind these goals and would work in any they
can with the city to see that the wishes of the citizens are realized in that way. Gease
added, during the next year, the Bureau would also be doing strategic planning for
their organization and the Kenai Visitor & Cultural Center. They would like to work
with the city to develop along-term plan for that building. He added, he believed the
city/non-profit partnership between the Bureau and the city had been very successful
and should be used as a model in working together.
Randy Daly, 108 Deepwood Court, Kenai -- Daly stated he was speaking on behalf
of the Economic Development District. He mirrored Gease's statement that the EDD
was very interested in the city's economic plan and extended their hand to help in
whatever way they can in providing data, etc. in the process. He commended the city
on Goal No. ~F.3, support and promote reuse and renovation projects of vacant or
underusd again commercial buildings along Spur Highway. Daly added, they were
very interested in what unique things (incentives) the city would develop to this regard.
Debbie Harris, 310 Portlock, Kenai -- Stated she was representing the Kenai River
Council on the Arts and expressed their support to the Commission and the
Comprehensive Plan. She noted, their focus is cultural and quality of life, and were
very supportive of Goals 1 and 10. Harris added, they were in the process of finding
and creating a performing arts/cultural center and would like to work with the
Commission in their work.
John Williams, Mayor, 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Kenai -- Suggested the following items
to be corrected, added or removed from the list of goals:
• Objective 1.3 -- Explained the Daubenspeck Tract was a small portion
of the area that has been referred to as "Millennium Square" and suggested, for
planning purposes, instead of identifying the property as Daubenspeck, it be referred
to, and officially at some point, as Millennium Square.
• Objective 1.8, Objective 6.2, and Objective 7.3 -- All refer to the bluff
erosion control program (stabilizing the Kenai River bluff, pursuing a stabilization
project, developing the coastal and bluff trail system). Because the city is having
difficulty in developing the project and because it is something the community would
like to see pursued, he requested this information be emphasized as a community
priority so the permitting agencies will understand that in their consideration of the
city's project applications.
• Objective 3.1 -- In the area of developing an assisted living facility, an
assessment of what the city's role in an assisted living facility should be considered,
PLANNING 8s ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 3
i.e. should the city assist a developer; how active a role should the city take; should
the city be involved itself in the development and operation of a facility; or is it beyond
the city's scope of services as a city.
• Objective 3.2 -- In regard to development of additional senior housing,
how should the city address that issue.
• ADD -- Objective 5.9.1 -- Would like to add: Provide for a community
center for use by a variety of groups.
• ADD -- Objective 8.6 -- Would like to add: Work toward or assist in the
development of a new National Guard Armory. He explained, currently the community
doesn't have a cammunity center. There will be discussions with the National Guard
to build a new facility closer to the airport. If it is built, it would be the city's request
to take over the current National Guard Armory and use it as a community center.
• REMOVE: Objective 9.1 and 9.2 -- Williams noted anything dealing
with education and the public school system is not within the purview of the city
government and suggested the item be removed from the list.
• ADD Objective 10.5 -- Provide for a community center.
• ADD Objective 10.6 -- Williams reported the council would have a work
session with the Planning & Zoning Commission, as well as other commissions of the
city to hear a presentation from the Central Peninsula General Hospital in regard to an
overview of future development of hospital facilities within the city. Whether it should
be made a part of the plan should be considered. He also suggested "expanded
hospital facilities" could be added in other areas of the Plan.
Commissioner Aaronson distributed a list of goals/objectives that he took from the list
included in the packet. He noted, there was a lot of repetition on the consultant's list
and suggested the items on their list be more specific, identifying the primary goals.
Commissioner Bryson explained there were same items on the consultant's list that he
didn't remember having the significance they received on the list. He noted the
fallowing items:
• Objective 4.2 -- AHFC mortgage loans was mentioned but in the context
of the cit.
• Objective 7.1 -- Referring to preserving the old trails in Section 36: It is
a trail, but entirely on private property.
• Objective 7.4 -- Expanding trails along all state highway corridors is an
issue addressed since 1979 when pedestrian/bicycle trails were requested for along
the spur highway system and Beaver Loop. There are many reports that would
substantiate that interest.
• Objective 8.5 -- He wasn't aware there was a perception there was not
adequate police protection.
• Objective 9.1 -- Local control of education is out of the purview of the
city government (noted by Mayor Williams).
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 4
Objective 9.3 -- Wasn't aware this item was discussed at the town
meeting.
Commissioner Goecke stated he agreed with Bryson's comments that there were some
items on the list he did not think were significantly important, but understood other
members of the public did feel were important, which was the paint of holding the
town meeting. He noted there would be some that would be eliminated.
City Planner Kebschull noted the following:
+ Felt it was important the Commission understand this was the time they
should give input as to items to remove, add, wording changes, etc. If they decided
not to do it at this meeting, they should schedule another meeting for that purpose.
She added, the consultants now need a draft list of goals and objectives.
• Commissioner Glick discussed the list with her and reiterated the items
Mayor Williams and Commissioner Bryson noted on Objective 9.1 and 9.2, in regard to
the control of public schools and stated they should be removed from the list.
• ADD Objective 9.1 -- Kebschull reported Glick requested another item
be placed on the list entitled, "The city should work with the school district to create
community schools in Kenai similar to Soldotna."
• Kebschull noted she received a comment from City Attorney Graves
regarding Objective 2.8. He reported, under the Fair Housing Act, the city cannot limit
or restrict group homes.
Kebschull requested direction from the Commission in regard to going through the list
itenn by item during this meeting or do it during another meeting.
Aaronson noted, since there were a number of items mentioned mare than once, he
asked a tally of the mentions. Bechtol stated they listed all the information from the
transparencies prepared by the teams at the town meeting. She added, they would
forward the requested information. Williams noted, some years ago the council chase
not to fund community schools and the information could be researched by the City
Clerk.
Bryson suggested another meeting be held to address specifics and provide direction
for the consultants. He noted Goal 9 for which he agreed with the general statement,
but not necessarily the items listed under it. At his table they discussed other
endeavors that could be included, i.e. improved education services for advanced age
adults, medical, etc.
Councilman Bannock suggested going through the list quickly during this meeting to
gain consensus whether to remove an item or not. The Commission considered taking
a break and then reviewing the list or holding a work session to review instead.
Williams noted, the consultants agreed through their contract to make several trips to
PLANNING 8v ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE S
Kenai in regard to development of the Plan. Kebschull reminded the Cocx~mission the
goal was to have a final draft of the Plan approved by the Commission by May.
Aaronson agreed the Commission could go through the list individually by the next
meeting and then discuss it again at their next meeting.
Daly agreed with Aaronson and suggested they review the lists individually, talk with
their constituents, and then edit the list. Bryson stated his concern that if the
Commission is constructing something, it should be in the Commission's sphere of
authority to construct. He noted, the Commission recommends to the Department of
Transportation, the Borough, etc. He added, there were a number of verbs in the
report's wording that were inappropriate for the authority.
Kebschull noted there were no goals included for the airport and airport lands and
incorporating some to that regard should be considered by the Commission. Williams
noted a work session the council would be holding on January 16 to hear future plans
of the hospital presentation and suggested the Commission should also attend as that
information may need to be included in the Plan.
Deciding how to go forward with the information was discussed further. Gease asked
how the public would be able to give input in the process. It was noted, the
development of the Plan would continue through Planning & Zoning Commission
meetings for the next several months. Kebschull noted, in her discussions with the
contractor, they will hold additional town meetings as needed, or by direction of the
council or commission. Bechtol noted, the contract states the draft plan deadline as
"generally by May" and she didn't think a later finish date would affect anything if
everyone agrees with the progress. Kebschull added, the completion of the draft
should be done within a compact amount of time because if it stretches out too long,
the process may then have to start over.
Whether to hold Saturday work sessions to hone the list was considered because it
was felt it could be facilitated by the contractor and held in a less formal situation
which could be more effective. However, it was decided the Commission would go
through the list individually, go through the list item by item at their next meeting
(January 9), and then schedule another town meeting to review the work.
ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION OF PLATS -- None
ITEM 5: PUBLIC HEARINGS -- Nane
ITEM 6: OLD BUSINESS -- None
ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 6
7-a. PZO1-72-Home Occupation Permit (Day Care)-For the property known
as Mommen's Subdivision Part of Additions 1 8~ 2 (1111 First Street).
Application submitted by Myrna Hogg, i 111 First Street, Kenai, Alaska.
Approved by consent agenda.
7-b. PZO1-73-Home Occupation Permit (Day Care)-For the property known
as Thompson Park Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 5 (4085 Lupine Drivel.
Application submitted by Lucinda Owens, 4085 Lupine Drive, Kenai,
Alaska.
Approved by consent agenda.
7-c. PZO1-74-Home Occupation Permit (Day Care)-For the property known
as Anchor Trailer Park, Gov't Lats 27-29, 32 & 33 (11823 Kenai Spur
Highway #1). Application submitted by Tammy Freeman, 11823 Kenai
Spur Highway #1, Kenai, Alaska.
MOTION:
Commissioner Bryson MOVED for approval of PZO1-74 for a Home Occupation Permit
and Commissioner Nord SECONDED the motion.
Commissioner Bryson explained he requested the item be removed from the consent
agenda because the applicant didn't include the number of children to be at the
facility and in which lot within the trailer court the applicant resides. He noted, the
information added to the agenda at the beginning of the meeting, answered his
questions sufficiently. He added, the application conforms to the requirements of the
Code, however he was concerned the property was close to the highway and had no
fencing and which he saw as potential of a hazard. He added, the Commission did not
have the authority to speak to that issue.
Kebschull stated, she spoke to Bryson about the day care application and they agreed
the application definitely met the requirements of the Code and the day care is
registered with the state. She noted, the KMC allows eight children and suggested the
Commission rrxay want to revisit the Code requirements and consider whether they
want to amend the city code to be the same as the state's. Goecke asked if the city
code could be made more restrictive than the state's and Kebschull answered, that
would have to be researched by the city attorney.
Bryson stated he wasn't proposing the safety aspect be made a condition of the permit,
but thought the issue should be reviewed by the city. He added, he would support the
approval of the permit.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 7
VOTE:
B son Yes Erwin Yes Goecke Yes
Nord Yes Osborne Yes Aaronson Yes
Glick Absent
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM 8: PENDING ITEMS
ITEM 9: CODE ENFORCEMENT
ITEM 10: REPORTS
10-a. City Council -- Bannock reviewed the action agenda included in the
packet and reported on actions taken at the December 5, meeting as follows:
• A presentation from Robert Ruffner of the Kenai Watershed Forum
regarding preliminary findings of a water quality study.
• A joint work session with the Airport Commission would be held on
Thursday, December 13 to continue discussions about taxation of private aircraft at
the airport and suggested the Commission may want to attend.
• Council formed a committee to consider a new design of the city's logo.
• The council denied a request for a discounted pay-off of deed of trust
notes in the McLane Bankruptcy cases.
• The Commission will be invited to attend a joint work session with
council on January 16 at 6:00 p.m. to hear a presentation by the Hospital regarding
their plans far expansion and how it would impact the city.
10-b. Borough Planning -- Bryson reviewed actions taken by the Borough
Planning Commission.
10-c. Administration -- Kebschull wished the Commission happy holidays
since the regularly scheduled December 26 meeting had been cancelled. The next
meeting will be held on January 9, 2002.
ITEM 11: PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED -- None.
ITEM 12: INFORMATION ITEMS
12-a. Zoning Bulletin (11/10/01 & 11/25/01)
12-b. City Council Roster
12-a. Planning & Zoning Roster
12-d. KPB Plat Connmittee Action
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER i2, 2001
PAGE 8
ITEM 13: COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS -- None.
ITEM 14: ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Commissioner Bryson MOVED to adjourn. There were no objections. SO ORDERED.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:21 p.m.
Minutes transcribce/d and prepared by:
/Jl, - ~/~~--~
Carol L. Freas, City Clerk
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 12, 2001
PAGE 9