HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-24 KRSMA Board Packet5pasciaBN9ageenentArea
"Working togeiher...tor the river"
QD V ~~0~ tl ° O/ru1~D
"~* Meeting Agenda"^~*
~
~~ L~"
'
Thursday, May 24, 2001 r ~~
.
Sp
7:00 p.m. ~; ~~$~' r .
Kenai River Center
• , ~ ~.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
B: Approval of 4/19101 minutes
C. Agenda Changes and Approval
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. Boat Wake Study -teleconference with Dr. Steve Maynord, ACOE-WES
B. Legislative Appropriation 'for a new lower river boat launch parcel
C. USFS Russian River Mining Withdrawal Proposal, Mike Kania, Seward
DistricC Ranger
D. Cooper Creek Erosion Concerns, Bill Shuster, USFS
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Update -Beaver Creek/Wolf Lake Marathon's pipeline construction
.resource damage, Jim Hall, Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
B. Recr-eation Impact-Study -Future plans, Chris Degernes
C. Kenai River Center Update, Suzanne Fisler
V. PUBLIC COMMENT
VI. ADJOURNMENT
A. Board Comments
B. DatelAgenda of Next Meeting
e Kenai Area Office, Boz 1247, Soldotna, AK 99669, Soldotna 2625581
Kenai F~ninsula Borough, Box 850, Soldotna, AK 99669, Soldotna 262-4441
Q Alaska Division of Parks and Outtloor Recmatlon, Department of Natural Resources, in cooperation with the Kenai Peninsula Borough ~
KENAI RIVER SPECIAL iVIANAGEMENT AREA
ADVISORY BOARD iVIEETING
April 19, 2001
Kenai River Center
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call:
Present: Jim Golden, Jeff King, Charles Quarre, Janette Cadieux, Ann
Whitmore-Painter, Rick Ross, Robin West, Paul Shadura, Clu-is Degernes, Rick
Wood, Bill Shuster, Deric Marcorelle, Ted Wellman, Glenda Landau for Lance
Trasky
Absent: Brett Huber, Tim Navarre, Jim H. Richardson
B. Approval of 3/15/01 minutes
Approved as written.
C. Agenda Changes and Approval
Bi11 Schuster added a new business item D, Co discuss the USFS's proposed
withdrawal of mineral rights near the Russian River area.
Deric Marcorelle added item E, a discussion of the need to study macro
invertebrates in the vicinity of the River Terrace contamination.
II. Public Comment
None
III. New Business
A. Jim Stratton -Div. of Parks & Outdoor Recreation.
Jirn gave a Legislative update, which included for the first time in 5 years
no budget cuts plate-ted and The state budget is steady Tl;is year with no park
closures planned. One of the problems with a budget that hasn't grown to
match inflation or the increased needs for park management is that we have
seen a lot of turn over with rangers in Kenai River District in the last few
years. He said the problem is with ranger positions in the Kenai Area being
8 month positions compared to 12 month positions in other areas around the
state. Parks needs to retain experienced river rangers who are willing to
learn the river, the issues, and KRSMA management needs, and not move to
12-month positions in other areas.
The Kenai River District has previously had four rangers, one Park Ranger
II at 12-months, Bill Berkhahn, and three Park Ranger I's with 8 month
seasons. Since August, two rangers have left the river program to seek
Kenai River Advisory Board
April 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 1 of 8
better jobs elsewhere that had longer seasons As a result, the Kenai River
District has been reorganized to have one 12-month Park Ranger II, two 10-
month Park Ranger I's and one Natural Resource Technician. Rangers can
then focus more on river management and enforcement, and lesson routine
campground maintenance and land unit work that will now be done by a
Natural Resource Technician. There will still be the same amount of river
patrol effort on the river itself.
Jim said the Legislature has not completed the Capital Budget yet. The
Legislature is working on two bills that affect KRSMA: one is HB 165,
which adds new KRSMA lands This bill passed the House and is in the
Senate now. The second bill, HB 159, would prohibit Parks from adding
new lands administratively to the park system if the total acreage would
exceed 40 acres, and it would prohibit Parks from managing any parcels of
land over 40 acres that were not legislatively approved. This bill would
impact the management of the Pillars and Cooper Landing Boat Launch and
a few other Kenai River Iands.
On the Federal level President Bush has proposed fk11y funding the state
side of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, with a total of
approximately 16,000,000 for Alaska. There is strong commitment in
Washington, DC for this program. The state would have to match the fiords
50/50, but this has the potential for finding some needed campground and
public access improvements in the Kenai Area.
On Sunday, May 20`x', 2001 there will be a Kid's Fishing Day, which
creates aone-day waiver for guides to be able to take kids fishing on a day
normally closed to fishing from guide boats. Parks and ADF&G worked
together to faeiiitaie tnis one day event. The kids 'that participate wiii be
able to fish at no cost. The idea is to promote more interest in sport fishing
by kids.
Bill Shuster asked if Fish and Game has a special fishing regulation in place
for the youth fishing.. He thought it would require special legislation. Jim
Stratton said this is a one-day event so Fish and Game has a waiver.
Paul asked what impact this has on the fish stocks during that time of year.
Jim Stratton said Fish and Game was comfortable wifll the idea and did not
mention stock concerns. Paul was worried about early run king salmon for
this special day of fishing. He does not want to see this continued as a
standard thing every year.
A member of the public asked if Pillars management world cease if HB 159
passed. Jim Stratton said it is an administratively created parcel, owned by
ADF&G but managed under a cooperative agreement. As the bill currently
Kenai River Advisory Board
Apri119, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 8
is written, Parks would not be able to manage this site unless the Legislature
specifically authorized us to do so.
Ted asked where HB 159 originated from and what the intent is. Jim
Stratton said it came from a 950-acre snowmobile closure ir. the Hatcher
Pass area.
Jeff King asked if the new Kenai River District technician would have
citation authority. Jsn Stratton said they will not. Chris said we will still
have to make spot checks in the campgrounds with our Law Enforcement
rangers, but this teclurician will be able to weed out many of the problems
before they occur. Rangers can then only respond to emergencies.
Charles asked what would happen if Parks couldn't manage parcels over 40
acres in size? Jim Stratton said no one would be authorized to manage
them.
B. Bridge Access Road Trail Project -John Dickinson, DOT, and Phil
Bryson, Wince-Corthell-Bryson
Phil Brycon, with Wince-Corthell-Bryson, stated that his firm has been
contracted by DOT to assist with design of a 3.5 mile long trail across the
Kenai River Flats that would connect on each end with the trails adjacent to
the Kenai Spur Highway and the K-Beach trail He said they have had
three meetings to date with one more preliminary agency scoping meeting
and one public informational meeting planned. The schedule for the project
consisfs of obtaining permits azid the design by 2002-2003 and construction
can then begin in 2004. Another meeting is scheduled for May 15`x' in the
Kenai Council Chambers at 1:30 p.m. and a public hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Paul asked if there is a proposal to get people across the bridge safely. John
said there are two alternatives right now which consist of using the existing
width of the bridge with narrow shoulders and having an 8 ft. walkway over
the bridge or to design a widening attachment to the bridge. Paul then asked
if airy wetland fill is plamred. John said with either alternative there will be
some fill in the wetlands.
Charles asked what is involved in the environmental assessment process,
and if permits are not approved, will that result in the prof ect being
cancelled? John said there are a lot of impacts to be addressed and if there
are too many negative ones there may be no project. John Dickinson then
went over what the permit process for this project will be.
C. Sterling Hwy Mile 45-60 Project- Laurie Mulcahy, DOT and Mark
Dalton, HDR Alaska.
Mark went over the background of this project, stating that the current
objective is to address the highway section between Mile 45-58. He has
Kenai River Advisory Board
April 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 8
been asked to supply a supplemental EIS. A draft EIS was approved in
1994, but there have been a number of new issues raised since that
document was completed, requiring that additional work be completed.
Mark said a series of workshops were held in March and there were clearly
mixed views by the people with a lot of good suggestions for the project. A
website, httpa/www.sterlin~lu~hway.net will be set up in the next couple of
weeks for anyone wanting information on the proj ect. The next agency
meeting in Cooper Landing is May 31s`. There will be a "Stakeholder
Sounding Board" to talk about issues and to get comments from the public
on May l0`h in Cooper Landing at the Community Center from 7-9 p.m.
The three basic alternatives that are being considered right now include the
Juneau Creek bypass with Refuge and Forest Service variants, the Kenai
River alternative with 5 new bridges and the Cooper Creek alternative on
the south side of the river, which may transition down near Cooper Creek or
extend further west toward Russian River. Scheduled this fall is an
extended outreach process with extra agency meetings and stakeholder
sounding boards. A draft supplemental EIS will be out later next winter,
2002. The decision to build or not to build will be out next sununer.
Ann asked how the new bridge design for the Kenai Lake outlet crossing
world affect the Cooper Landing Boat Lalmch facility. Mark said they
want to be able to replace the old bridge by building a new one on either
side and that they need to consider the impact on the Parks boat launche
Jim Golden asked why the existing road could not be upgraded instead of
having two roads to maintain. Mark said the new road will improve the
convenience and safety of traffYC through tine Cooper Landing community.
Janette asked why the Juneau Creek alternative would go above the falls.
Mark replied that crossing the creek canyon downstream from the falls
would be very expensive due to the bridge span length. However, they are
looking at alternate lower routes in that area.
Paul said he does not like the idea of the new bridges over the Kenai River
and asked if DOT and HDR are just reevaluating the work from 25 years
ago and making new analysis now. Mark said yes, they are re-evaluating
the old data.
Ted said it is frustrating that here 25 years later, traffic is still crawling
through Cooper Landing and we are not any closer to getting the project
done. He asked that this boardbe included in the discussions and public
process. He asked for volunteers to serve on a committee for this process.
The subcommittee will consist of: Ann, Janette, Jim G., Suzanne, Chris and
Bill.
Kenai River Advisory Board
April 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 8
D. Bill Shuster-li~dining Withdrawal in the Russian River area
The U.S. Forest Service has proposed to BLM that they add just under 3000
acres, extending from the Russian River campground to Upper Russian
Lake, to their existing mining area withdrawal: Bill said there is one mining
claim in the area that is a "non-locatable deposit". Bill said the Forest
Service is interested in the withdrawal because the area is adjacent to the
Russian River, which is important brown bear and salmon habitat. The
Forest Service is concerned about how mining close to the river might
impact these resources. The proposed 2998-acre withdrawal would be
added to the existing withdrawal and has gone forth to the BLM and is in
the federal register now. Public comments are being accepted right now.
Janette asked if Red Smith has the one claim within this withdrawal area?
Bi11 said yes, and a mineral exun was completed which concluded that the
limestone is a "non-locatable" mineral form.
Charles asked how this proceeds from the federal registry. Bill said they
will take public comments on this and make a decision on this fora 20-year
withdrawal. In a couple of decades, the decision could be re-evaluated.
Ted asked how the Forest Service ended up with such a meager withdrawal.
Bill said it was to mhumize the extent of the withdrawal to just that
necessary to maintain abuffer of %< mile from The river.
Ted said that the board would like more information on this so that a board
letter can be prepared prior to the May 29"' comment deadline. 'T`his shoulc
be on the agenda for the next meeting. Bill said he would provide more
information to the board.
E. Deric Marcorelle-14~Iacro Invertebrates.
Deric received an update from Rich Sundet with DEC, who has been
leading the effort to clean up the contamination at the River Terrace RV
Park. Rich warted to remind the board that when ADF&G ccnducted same
water quality tests in the early 1990's, they identified a potential problem in
the Soldotna area as evidenced by aquatic insect numbers and ratios
indicating a water quality problem. No further efforts were made to trace
the source causing this problem. Deric stated now that we know the River
Terrace has been. a source for contamination it would be important to check
on these macro invertebrates again.
Rick Ross asked if ADF&G can evaluate this question and get back to the
Board. Glenda said she would pass it along to Lance.
Kenai River Advisory Board
Apri119, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 5 of 8
IV, C)Id Business
A. Recreation Impact Study -Glares Degernes
Chris provided a review of what has been happening to date. There has
been some discussion of dividing the study into two phases. The first year,
we could conduct exit surveys and video the activity at certain areas. We
could also test the usefulness of the GPS monitoring project, and work out
any bugs in this part of the shtdy. Then in year two, with extra funding,
ample numbers of GPS units can be purchased, and this part of the study
can be completed.
Paul asked if the Alaska Pacific University is still interested in assisting
with the study? He stated that it would be important to take advantage of
their expertise.
Chris stated that there have been cautionary statements from ADF&G to
wait until the Legislature completes the capital budget before we'll know if
the money siuvives. Assuming it does, the available 60.0 will be split with
ADF&G, and we will have the 30.0 as planned.
Ted stated that it will be important to proceed with at least the survey and
video work this season. He expressed that he is a bit nervous about the GPS
monitoring, but would like to see some testing of this idea this summer too.
He recommends that the Board proceed with the two-phase process idea,
and meet in committee to prepare the final plan. Hearing no objection to
this idea, he stated we will move forward.
~. Boat Vdake Study Ugdate -Glenda Landau for Lance ~'rasky
Glenda said the report arrived today and copies have been made for the
board members. She said there is a lot of technical information still in the
report. Glenda stated that the board should fake the next month to review
the draft study and prepare some questions that can be forwarded to Dr.
Steve Maynord for him to cover during our next meeting. Glenda advised
the board to read the draft report carefully and not just read the brief
conclusions.
Glenda also reported that Lance has talked to Gordon Nelson, USGS, and
he is committed to conducting more work on the Kenai River once a federal
hiring freeze is lifted.
Paul asked if the study looked at just wakes produced by boats operating
under the maximum power. Chris said both maximum power and the speed
to produce the maximum wake were evaluated.
Chris reminded the board this is a draft and the board can still provide input
on how the final plan can be presented.
Kenai River Advisory Board
April 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 6 of 8
Rick Ross said that the users of the river will need to understand what this
report means.
Ted said we should all read it before too many questions are asked. He
urged the Board to carefully read the report and prepare a list of questions to
provide to Dr. Maynord. Chris and Lance will compile the list to provide to
Dr. Maynord prior to the teleconference with him next month.
C. Kenai River Center Update - Suzanne Fisder
Suzanne said that tlu-ee orientation sessions have been held so far for the
Kenai River commercial operators, four more planned. She said there have
been audiences of 75 plus and there has been great feedback on the
orientations from both new and veteran guides. Kenai river guides are
trickling in now while guides utilizing Deep Creek and Kachemak Bay are
registering in larger numbers right now. Suzanne said that the River Center
received a small grant to do bank restoration on the Kenai River and they
will Try to match that with federal funding to improve access to the river
below KRC. They also want to improve ADA access to the river below the
center.
The Kenai River Center is looking for funding to hire a person to do
research and compile parcel permits from over the years to make sure we
have all the parcel numbers and paperwork in the correct files. She said
once that is done they could take the Fish & Game f les and slides they have
and integrate all these items and you will see the changes over time to
parficular parcels. She said they are still working on plans to use EPA grant
money to get the library organized, and outreach programs for the river
center that have been planned.
Ted said he heard about someone hydroaxing vegetation along the river.
Suzanne said that Chugach Electric Assoc. conducted some clearing below
their powerlines in the Quartz Creek area, and violated the Borough's 50
foot habitat protection ordinance by cleat-ing within 50 i cf the creek. She
believes that they did this accidentally as the creek corridor was avoided in
another section of creek. In another incident, DOT contracted out some
clearing along the Sterling Highway and also violated the Borough's 50 foot
ordinance. DOT's superintendent George Church has been advised by the
Borough of the problem. Suzanne said that both incidents were violations
of borough ordinances and the Borough would be addressing the issues.
V. Public Comment
Dale Bondurant said that he supports the US Forest Service's proposal to withdraw
the areas around Russian River to mining. He has seen what the mining has done to
Kenai River Advisory Board
April 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 8
the area, and believes that mining in the Russian River area would ruin habitat and
recreation.
Vf. Adjournment
A. Board Commeuts:
Rick W. would like to see the boat wake shady made user friendly and more
readable for people to be able to understand.
Doric said DEC would be hiring a frill time water quality person soon, and this
person is expected to assume DEC's position on the board. He will finish out
the year.
Jim G. said that more community involvement would be great in the Mile A5-60
Sterling Highway project's stakeholder process.
Chris said she that wants to take a moment to recognize Suzamie for all her hard
work in organizing the guide orientation sessions and representing DNR well at
the Kenai River Center.
Paul said he would like afollow-up on the Beaver Cr/Wolf Lake problem with
Marathon Oil. Paul also wanted to know if Marathon will be fined for the
problems. 1-le also said that the Borough Assembly passed a resolution in
support of HB 165.
Robin said Marathon's pipeline work is finished, and that Marathon will be
responsible for restoring the area.. He believes the problem was a result of the
lack of"snow and warm weather. Once the area dries up, a determination wi'l'l
be made on what level of restoration needs to take place. He will. be able to
provide more information at the next meeting.
Tim Stratton said he recently attended a boating safety conference and there is a
website to promote fishing and boating, the Recreational Boating and Fishing
Foundation, www.rbff org. He also wants to thank everyone for his or her
volunteer tune for this board.
Ted said he wants to remind all board members that care should be taken in
testifying before public bodies, and that board members should only testify on
board issues if authorized by the board or speaking onboard positions.
Otherwise, the member should state that their testimony is personal.
B. Date of next meeting: May 24, 2001
Agenda of next meeting: Boat Wake Study teleconference with Dr.
Maynord; Forest Service mining withdrawal; Beaver Creek/Wolf Lake
Kenai River Advisory Board
Aprd 19, 2001 Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 8