HomeMy WebLinkAboutRoads Taskforce - Minutes (3)AGENDA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TASK FORCE
AUGUST 11, 1988 - 7:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Election of Chairman
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Approval
B. DISCUSSION
1. Review of Material
2. Schedule for Election or Amend by Code
Election - Charter Amendment or Stated Policy
Election - Yes/No Ballot or Choices
Code - ordinance
COUNCIL MEETING OF ~- jp-- ~; ~
~`
~~
}
e
~"~ i
~
~
/
/~ ~._,
J ~
z=~--.. -'~
~" ~ __ _
~ use-.~,.-,y_,Cr
~~i 2ei ~~
U
COUNCIL DtEETING OF
._
/i
r
~ ~ ,``~-y
~~~ 7
~" , ~~~"
'`~ ~ i. ~ ~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF ELECTIONS
~~J ;1 ia~~ ~~ '~l~ .i~ a
f
OFFICEOFTHEGO~ERNOR f L+~ Region I Elections Office
„P ^ Region II Elections Office
~° ^ Region III Elections Office
~~~Qf 12T~~9 ^ Region IV Elections Office
's
ti ,UG 1888 °;
August 8, 1988 m ;~_
o ~.b:K
~'
c, ''''oF KE ~; c, ~'
Janet Ruotsala
Kenai City Clerk
210 Fidalgo
Kenai, Alaska 99611
Dear Ms. Ruotsala:
This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding your holding
a special election on November 8, the same day as the state
election, and using the state election boards to distribute your
ballots.
With November 8 being a presidential election, the state ballot
will consist of three cards; which takes extra time and special
care from the boards. In a state election, the election boards
handle two registers. With accountability being of uppermost
concern, adding two more registers for your election plus another
ballot could create many problems.
In conferring with the Director
put too much of a burden on the
serving at the polling places.
of Elections we feel this would
election officials who will be
I hope the above expresses our concern and ask that you schedule
your election on a different day.
Sin erely,
Rose MarieG ood
Region I Elections Supervisor
Region I Elections O//ice Region ll Elections O//ice Region 111 Elections Oi/ice Region IV Elections Olfice
P.O. Box AF, MS 0106 Y313 East Third Avenue 675 7th Ave., Station H P.O. Box 577
Juneau, Alaska 99811-0106 Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2879 Fairbanks, Alaska 99707-4594 Nome, Alaska 99762-0577
Phone: /907) 465.3021 Phone: (907) 276-8683 Phone: (907) 451-2835 Phone: (907) 443-5285
Ot-A3 LH
ELECTION CALENDAR - 1988
(Special Election, Nov. 8, 1988)
Sept. 8 - Pre-clearance must be in Wash. D.C.
Sept. 21 - Council approve resolution for baiiot
Oct. 5 - Council approve judges
Nov. 8 - Special Election (coincides with general election)
Nov. 15 - Canvassing Board meet
Nov. 16 - Council certify election
KENAI CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 3, 1988
PAGE 2
--~~
decide. Councilwoman Swarner said the task force
should have an answer by the middle of Sept.
Councilwoman Bailie suggested the task force elect
their own chairman.
VOTE:
Vote passed unanimously by roll call vote.
Councilwoman Bailie asked that this be set up as soon
as possible. Clerk Ruotsala will handle it.
Councilman McComsey asked if the motion included the
names recommended. Councilwoman Bailie replied, yes.
Councilman McComsey noted he would like to add others.
Councilwoman Monfor said it should be open to the
public. A representative from the committee or
Councilman Measles could give the report. Finance
Director Brown asked, is the purpose of the task force
to come up with fair wording on the ballot or their
preference? Councilwoman Monfor replied, fair wording.
Finance Director Brown said, Council is not asking them
to come up with recommendations, this is not
compatible. Councilwoman Bailie replied, they are
coming to a decision regarding the task. It will be
voted on by the group. Councilwoman O'Reilly said the
job of the task force is to come up with a fair way to
pay for capital improvement projects. The wording for
die"ballot would be by Administration. Finance
Director Brown added, a recommendation as to how the
financing will take place. Council agreed to the
statements. Councilwoman Monfor said someone will have
to explain how this will be done, probably
Administration.
1/ ~-~-
Janet Ruotsala
City Clerk
KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
PARTIAL TRANSLATION - MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1988 - 7:00 PM
KENAI CITY HALL
MAYOR JOHN J. WILLIAMS PRESIDING
H-8 ADDED ITEM - Task Farce for Capital Improvement
Projects, Procedures for Payment
Councilwoman Bailie. It was suggested by Councilman
Measles to have an initiative on the October ballot to
vote on the process for regulating procedures for
_,._ cagital improvement projects. Clerk Ruotsala said the
ballot proposition must be in and approved by Council
by August 17. The instructions must be specific
regarding functions. We need as much support as
possible from Administration, including a secretary,
attendance at meetings by City Manager Brighton &
Public Works Director Kornelis, and a record of prior
action by the City. She suggested:
Duane Quellette - Eagle Rock
Dale Sandahl - Thompson Park S/D
Don St. John - VIP S/D
Frank Getty - Candlelight Area
Leon Quesnel - Woodland S/D
Colleen Ward, Flo Mccollum, Rick Baldwin -
McCollum Area
She asked that they all be contacted to see if they are
willing. Ron Malston is willing to serve, but will not
be back till Aug. 17. She suggested Councilman Measles
as Ad Hoc member. Councilwoman O'Reilly asked, what
will they come up with and will there be enough time?
Council agreed to schedule the election to coincide
with the Nov. 8 State and Federal election.
MOTION:
Councilwoman Swarner moved, seconded by Councilwoman
Bailie, to go ahead with the task force.
Councilwoman Monfor said it should be developed without
loaded questions and be a cross section. Councilwoman
Bailie said this will come up again, it needs to be
settled once and for all so Council will not be faced
with this again. The committee could come up with
gus gestions to put on the ballot. Councilwoman
_ O'Reilly said the task force will come up with
recommendations regarding how this will be done. It
will be a yes or no. Clerk Ruotsala asked if Council
wanted this to be a Charter amendment or just a policy
vote. Councilwoman Bailie replied, the committee will
'i-
xE4AI Clly EOU4EIL
OCfOBE(t 2, 1985
Page iS
h
rSk •~
3
the fAA gate sore •ggreselve •e ae qe[ ears aggreenire,
Phey rare offended when Scn. Nuckoanki got lnrolved. Ma
cwt nsvo to Ilve rl[h [h U. [[ ie the Hare rich the
fl orcugh. They sould nave •n lnclnerstar in the City.
]f they duaped oil In the dump, chat wise nave they
done? ylce Mayor Neaelea noted 6 years ago re had no
toopeeatlon feoo fAA. Ne could not Hell of lease land.
Over the loot 5 yerre theca hu been • change 1n their
at tl rude. Naybo re hove become too aggreneive
tecentir end they ate cere[tlnq back t0 thherhandno
hrblta. 11 the Clty 1• completely rlgnt.
prabter. Couneidraun Nonfor sold regarding the
Borough. It le euy fat us •s Connell, re ere nok
corking rlth than on • day to day ba•lo.
Adm lnlrttsi ion acre on direction of Council. Shr
eugqu red Nr. Brighton sit darn rlth the Borough miih •
11 •t of comp Ltnt• and deal rlth them instead of .
butting Heads. 91er Nayor Nuatu said regarding
•lrpo[t lneuronce. Me need to look into !t further.
(hate U • middle ground that mill not lncraus
lirblllty or prertums and rill help •St llne• and othae
:' inane. The blq cone rn 1• their being held lUbls for
eouthinq that le not their concern. tf they • Let to
cancel inrir lraae• they ore no longer 1Lbls .. fMy
sou ld sell tfckota on CM it Dlanee, teal into thm
tunrey end hrr• no lfablllty. (hr C2ty could have •11
.. iiabil icy.
fhY City Atternay
' Atty. Rogrre spoke.
e.
b.
e.
AC thla limo three is a qusation a to the st d.u•
r lthout signed loasa• In the airport, do r• Mr•
indemn if ie tt loot Ye had miih the !rases that nn out,
but do not Mra nor. Ne rill •ttaapt to qr t; tM lucre
•ignad union M hu other direct lan.
Info ilea tt, •bateaent of dangsrou• bufi6inga. Shore
is fustner info Harlon rrgardlnq In rtallatlon •greeu nt
oPP forest by Soere Eleoanteey 6y Grant NeLure. On
lnrtall at ion agraou nt ra take deed oP 4ruat till ra
tecrpt roads. Soso oP thus eta going on. tle rill
bring to Council !f you datito. Enfo 1U• .27 1•
•Sr1 Lr.
Info ltu /20, nplattlnq request, Aleyaska 5/D. Yhl•
rill b• •t CM le~rrprna•• H• did not knot the
purpose.
~C It of Kana1. Th•
*- d. into !t o• 129. Prosser Conat. ra y
Lt k'2 nd
City rltnM ld $12,000 for retain eg• on
d
p+~ •[ta rte cork. shay awd, ra von. T-', Hero offere
000. r• could pay. H• hea • coun.ot elai• of
$6
~• ,
$91,000. Na •ekrd 1P Counc ll rlnhed hie to proceed
~
:
a ~ .; rlth denial oP elrlrs.
.
,
'1 ~ touneil ogre rd rltn hie dreialon.
'
~ ~~ . -~
fi X-S Mayor
None
: ~ H-A City Clerk
F
f Mon•
't
` N-S finance Dlte ctot
'.
:
~/
-in •nu Director Bravo roPerred to the N-S •uo• In the
~:4.
~ paCkat, end asked lost cosy 0• dlecuued et the cork
' `4 t union,
'
~
{,
_
. 7
..: ~. _._ _._.__. ..~.......~....-... __
-_
~.
y.rr .,
'3t.~'v~..ll a*~ nt /~: ~.l.v. .tr~~x~._. i.~ 1 •1 M°~'/~ .r Y~l'.iti S~j .F .. }~tf~5 1.~^^7 ~.~y~B
. k
.. ~' .~ a m
IQ:MO TO: Kenai C(Cy Council
PtOM: Cher le• A. grown, Finance Director (A Q
DATE: Eap[esber 26, 1985
EDEJECT: Mmeeasmnu
%G- ~-~S~
N°S
AC last nighc'• wrkmaesion. Cho wbjecC o[ wing 9500,000 04 Che 92•'1
sill ion grant dor ucchins money on aaaeusenc discricu vas dimcuaead.
Ma rill earurk ehi• uongr for asssessent diacrica. Norevar, at Boas
point, [M Adsinta[rac tan rill nasd apaci4lc guidal ina• oa hor co
adviaa the public of the availability of thaw funds.
Coundl agreed chat it mould be wed co retch asdnsc • SOY aaaus.mnt
Lor pavlog projects. Me Nve authorised/uniuwd bonda of S1, 150,000,
of which 9360.000 should W veld dor the Aliek/MCCollu• project. That
lava 3E10,000 0! awilabl• bonda Lor advwca financing of cM
useuad portion.
The quutiosa to M considered arr.
'1D I4 wtar andlor carer wrvices are uquuead !n conjunction with
pains, ahali chow wrvicw alw ba amilabls for the SOY
uwasmt rat io7
g3 It a developer/mbd[vWer nquuc• a SOY aluurnC district, an
CMu fumda aailable to hisT
7) IL Cornell rishs• to a:<luda davelopsu, rhich weu eo M chs
prmesdaat eat (i.a., Ialat Moods, Spru<erood Clan, Ecstlar), hor
do w idsntt[y • dewlopaet A D+rc7 eNt ovrts 20Y od thm land is
a peoyosed dlatrictt gov about SOYT
Moat regwau !or uwusanc disericb is reewc yur• lure been Lroa
deva lopsn, They s+7 ow a L*ga portion od cM land involved, but
ssuaily eWrs m otMr Wnetited properties also. This ram, the uw
- im bproesrood Olan mnd oa Eceller. Me should hams m rely rampoaaa to
'. thcas pwPls rho rill inquire above than fYnd s.
Finally, 8 vent [o wri4y chat this sons? (ins 3500.000 0[ ut-aa tda
romd gran[) is sot intended dor trawl road uuassance. Thin ram sy
mdsntandiag of Counell'a imtene. And, of cour+a, in cosplimce rith
the grant, !c ea:o't M wad !or rater mad serer •loaa. That is rhy w
wjs<cad wa of thin suwy dor CM •s waswat pmt it ion on Cat. Luca
AS mod ~6, Esc. 34, rhich appeared marl Gr m eha ateada.
V
:±a -
s'cH-r '~~ e c C _
.,t ~ ~ ..
1 !. -.. '
__.~"`"angyM 3
_ ~~ ~~~~yy~ ~ M ~ iI-
_"- ,
K(1al f IIr uu'V If
Narrn l0. 19ei
V:o f" IS
NgiIUM:
Cn~Aa'lloran tlfse mnvrvd In Unuipgnrv It~4 fPnm fa inn nrvri. mretfng r
fiR innf rngvesP a forma) le4n lot inn Lb drain rvri Pnt Wrhlin nratlnn
sec nralrvd by Cr"u~rPlanman Raf lfe.
YB (E:
Nottnn pawed Dv uneN arpta rnnsenl
R REPONiS
M-1 City Nanaq~r
Plannlnq 8 Zoning Mm revicaed an ordinance pcopneed Dy the Borough -
req+rdrrq uniPprn street nantnq atthln the Borough. [i tv Nan+ger
Brtgnt on rma Infnrned Nat [he Planning Car ieeton recprrserrled _.
approval alth 2 eviceptfona. lJ"rr!a or changetl street mars shall not
tlupi(care evfetinq st roe! Wanes rtthtn the Borough" ah(ch neam If
Kenai ham + Nafn Street. Monet can't have s Main Street Clty Manager
- Brighton •uted Nat tM planning department at the Borough ought ~ ,,
no[to De telllnq the City aP Kenai what to Wane !belt streets. L "toe
Plane lrp Crnr (salon (Bocpugni ur be reeolut ion, change. rename. ar
Wane an evle[lnq or established street rlthin the Borough •t am tine ~.
- Ater the adoption of (life ordinance upon notiflution" end Aoas rrt "
sav consent o/ nunlclpalftlee. It mava Atet consultation, Mayor
Kagoror oD Jected to the overall ordinance, "tM t'• rhv the Ctty of ... ..
Kenai regues[eo for and recedved tt+eft xonirq porrera was to enable ua
to do our own xoninq and that includes nanlnq our own •treeb and
- ehanglnq n+nea, case Sn point, [hlnulna Point, ae were ao rorrled
- about duplicating the n+ne taxwse there 1^ one In the 8oraxlh. Lard
Manager labahn erplalned thsL the concept of the ordtnanca Is to
coordinate street nanlnq aP s Boeougn-aids Dae la. Khere eaergertcy
- response L corcerned rithln eerv ice areas. !t cwee+ the 8orwgh none
peoblena. this le wM re they are coning Cron. "If the Borough is
going to take over the "authorl4y" the Clty at111 needs [o play an
lamortent roll 1n the street nanlnq. Khat the Borough la requestlnq
1s that they would tecagnlxe all the evlrtf ng,etreeta the wry they ate
nos. but alien addlttans! streets oc+ae on line: lost would qo through
the Borovyh Ion euthorixation." Mayor Kagoner stated that "chat 4ha
- Cassell fs su~~e~tlnq that you cormrnicate rlth then toot Council
doeen't twy lost. the Borough aM the ere+a they ere concerned about
are not Drovtdinq any emergerMV eerv lees rt[hin the Clty of Kemal.
therefore 4here mould M no conflict. the lr problem f• within their
own service dts4rlc [s ecd the urwrganlzed portions pf the Borwgh," ~ -
Cwncflnan Klee atsted that Host o/ the Deop le are able to identlPy f9 -
thev ere on Redoubt to Kenai rather then Redoubt !n Soidotna, i don't
see that as valid. Mayor tlagoner asked Lard Meneger Labahn to
!noon(! foams feelinge to the Boraph.
x _. _._
k4y 3 <
~,..'.
~' r
1 ,
i.
a, ~ .
klval iln rnuvu
atrh 20. IyNS
p ax Iv
why tnerr ~a^'t 0. a flat !n. arvf tf that's nnf ...HfA la a MrDl u'
utll ttv, it mev'r* not gninA [n Prnv nfa fhxt public util llv netvire
tlw!n 1 tnlnV the ro+tnwar anA the Ahata nnlrlern hmva a right to
Cpa4nlm an. 1 think we +nnulA apPfoach thew, Pha OnarA. anA PtIC if
neceaaa [v to xt + tlmnf 1rmt inn." Mavnt wxrinwt axkeA i/ frrrrr.llwan
elms r+e aaklnq a reaueat of Dubl tt wbrkA, ansrer vea. Xarnt Magnnet
6a[ tM+ IteM fdr newt rettM•
:-3S 67acume lrM - pertant Par Yatat b Sera Assess, Df atrtc4
Tht• tin Is added ss + result of she work sane ion before the west Ong.
The Cwrril. /eellnq • need Pot a Dolfrv rich mpprpaclmd OY tM Dubl lc
requestynq + rater 8 saver •aeeseaent df atrf ct.
ylDtt04i
Counts loan Ackerly saved that renter b sewer aeeeeawent percentages be
set at 50:. secoMed Dy Countt !coven Mont or.
[ounciiwn Nall eked if this was to to eetmbllahed tot new
aubdf victims or pettainiry only to Diet irp et rash.
igTION 11ft[ttOMEMTt
Councilun Nedl +~etded the roLlm to lydtcate the percentages could
not pertain to new subd3vle Sons, aeconaed by Coimuldrowsn Nmtor.
Ca++clls+n Y1se Pelt 50'. la too high. I tMnk tt la Drohtblttve srd
penal sting tMN wM rerM't able to get thedt reWeata Sn.
MDl Itklt
Councilwn siee saved td awend the percentage to 25,
IgTIDN !6715 for LCk o! second
Cax+tilrpsan B+tlte stated that at one tlwe when we rare gett Srq ~afeY
lror the state re were very Oluan and reddents o/ the city cars
getting lODS of the •we+sarnt Atatt icL Then +t + tlae when ve tud
soney we rare 6olnq It wi~nout +nenarnt snd I feel that 50Y 1s fats
and spot t+Dle st thU tine. Councllsan Mall eked lP of tat +pprov lfq
this rill the priority Itst be changed. Finance Dl rector Brown
amwere0 t.Mt tt anmld De fie. ibis enough to bs + quid+nee altwtlon.
1 think you us think inq In terxa Of developwent Includlrp suit lDiB
property pwnen. You sill •t 111 Mve a sitwtim ilke Nclanaa rhen
you won't rant to put anythfnq Into ft. to clulfy, Mayor Magoner
stated Courcl lean N+11'a asetd+ent takes care of this. +• tt only
psrt+lm to currently eala[!nq toads. not any future aubdlvlalma.
Councltun siae •ts[ed tMt he had s Ocoblew of lntroduc lnq tN a •a •n
action ltaw rlthwt holding a publdc hear lrq.
1
f
1 y,
t
'z
. ~ ~ .,'~~'~' .~..~~ ..b ~. ~.
t:
~ ~
Suggested by: Council
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 87-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA,
REQUESTING THE GOVERNOR TO PUT $3.335 MILLION OF .ROAD
IMPROVEMENT MONIES INTO HIS BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF KENAI,
ALASKA.
WHEREAS, input for the 1988-89 CIP list from the Kenai City
Council, City Administration and the eitizens of the city of
Renai has resulted in the following prioritized CIP list
being requested of the State of Alaska, and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Council that gaving
projects in residential areas will be partially funded by
forming assessment districts in order to make any available
State funding go farther toward .completion of the priority
list, and
WHEREAS, the following public meetings were held,
Meetings Open to the Public
10/22/87 10/26/87 10/27/87
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Kenai, after receiving
and analyzing the input from all sources and after such
discussion and deliberation, has decided to .adopt the'
attached 1988-89 CIP List, and
WHEREAS, the State of Alaska receives approximately $300
million on an annual basis from the Cook Inlet oil and gas
industry from such sources as the 20 mill oil property tax
and royalties from the production of oil and gas, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai receives the major impact from
the activity that takes place due to the additional activity
and commerce created by the oil and gas industry and all of
the services provided by the City of Kenai are heavily
impacted by such activity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENAI, ALASKA, that the City of Kenai is requesting the
Governor to add $3.335 million to his budget for road
improvement and upgrade in the City of Kenai, Alaska to
permit the City to meet the needs of its citizens and
neighbors.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that prior to initiating paving
projects in residential areas through the use of State funds
the City shall hold public hearings towards the formation of
special assessment districts to partially fund projects
listed under the Capital Improve:cients Project priority list.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this
27th day of October, 1987.
.=g~:'~`~'~
JOHN WILLIAMS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
G{~ilJC.iQ ~y~~~4t~--fit
net Whelan, City Clerk
Y
y_3 -'~
O
Suggested bp: City Cov n<tl
CITY OF KENA[
RESOLUTIOx a0. 85-33
A RE SOLUPION Of THE COUNClI 06 dHE CITp Of KEaAl, AUSKA SEPfYNG
A POLICY REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF COS(S Of STREE(S, rATER AND
SEVER, ANO OTHER 1MPROrEMENfS TO BE A55ESSED TO BE kEf [TED
PROPERTp OrxERS.
etHEREAS, the Couril des±ras that oeo pertp orners pap all Or s -
portien of iepro•eme nts to streets, rater an0 serer, end other
such imp[aveaents that benefit Drirate Drops rt les. and
YHEREAS, sasessaents to peopertp orne ra vili result in a rare
equitable disc ribution of [itp resources, and rill alloy grant
monies to 0e used foe sore Drojects.
f1t1a, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8T THE COUp[IL Oi dNE CITY OF
KENAi, ALASKA iHAT THE fOLl0Y1N6 GENERAL POLICY t5 ADOPTED FOR
WIDANCE TO THE [ITp ADMINISTRATION AND fHE PUBLIC:
Section T: Pater and serer late nl eanstruction in the Citp
of Kenai shall result in assessments against
' Denefitad pcopertlea at the rate of 505 of
costs. Ho+e•et, iP a subet sntial portion of
.ti: _.
~~
.:'c
, }!
i .',~.
~'.'~t
-.izt<~~ ... s
properties in • Proposed asaesaaent daseriet -
la owned 6p o.x or a Per camaon orne ea, or it
appeals to the Council that the Or nets ate
acting as developers, the rise lament Mall be
at 1005 of costa.
Section 2: Cost of construction of rater and carer aain
interceptor lines rill generQlp not be assessed
against ProPert iea. _ _
Section 3: Street, aide+alk, storm drain, Iightinq, and
other improrementa shall re au It in as aeaarenta
against benefited properties at the rate of (DOS
of coats.
Section A: In eertain cite wetanees, the Citp Council asp
determine thst it La in the beat interest of the
City t.o ^a&e eertain improrementa, inc lading
rater, sere[. or street imp toreaents. rlthout
rise ascent in order to enh ante orderlp
da•elopment ar for of Mr putDoses.
T
i
a O _-~
~S'4~ ' ~`."1a11. . , ..M.. v.
+.
r
l:oa 5: All cons[ tact ion Oro Jects mre sub Ject to
a•u laoil i[y of eon acs. botn Tor the assessed
snd non-assessed Dort sons. ~otn lnq in [hts
rasa tut con is aemni to 4ire mssurmnce tna[ such
conies etll be m•aalable. /~ r
r epE COUiCtI OF PNE E[Pr OF KEVAt, A[ASKA tnis 3rd day k''+.Y7r}`
1985. U
TOM mACUlER, MAPOR
ie Ln, City Cletk ...
9 by Finance:
._ ,:_
y.
Z
~:::,p
~Y-~r
t.t-^S~
M
r NY y~1
'r~s
.aP
«~d
~!~
``3~
+ ~~Sr~
?'A?
e;J
~ .~>•
rr]]~~ vM COY
. ~ ! :... r .i .. ,+. a .. ~ 4~~w3P.~~~6~b ~ ~
K M C--
L. vla. r '~- Per'
election by a majority of those qualified o vote and voting
on the question. Revenue bonds issued to, pay the cost of a
facility to be used by ten customers or ess for the purpose
of promoting economic development in a around the city,
may be authorized by the council witho t an election if the
debt is payable solely by the users. (Amended February 13,
1979, by Ord. 450).
Section 6-4, (Repealed
4, 1969).
Section 6-5. Industrial evelo meat bonds. The city
shall have the power to borro money and to issue bonds or
other evidence of indebtedn s for the purpose of promoting
economic development in an adjacent to the city. Such in-
debtedness may be authori d by the council without a vote
of the electorate for ob gations which are defined as in-
dustrial development bo s by the United States Internal
Revenue Code, as amend The city may, with respect to
.the issuance of such bt, acquire, purchase, lease, con-
struct, sell, subleas' or otherwise dispose of projects by
action of the counci'. No bonds or other indebtedness issued
by the city under is section shall be repayable from taxes
levied by the city nor be a charge against the general credit
of the city. (Am nded February 13, 1979, by Ord. 450).
ARTICLE 7.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMEN^tS
Section 7-l. How cost may be paid. The cost of a pub-
lic improvement may be paid wholly by the city, or partly
by the city and partly by benefitted real property, or wholly
by benefitted real property, as the council may determine.
Said cost or part thereof to be borne by benefitted real
property may be assessed by special assessment upon such
benefitted property,
.Section 7-2. Special-.assessment-procedure.--The-council
may begin procedure for public improvements when all or part
of the cost thereof is to be paid by benefitted real property,
either on its own initiative or upon receipt of a petition.
The council shall prescribe by ordinance complete special-
assessment procedure for such improvements, t9ithout limiting
the procedure cahich may thus be prescribed, it is hereby pro-
vided that such special-assessment procedure may (but is not
hereby required to) provide for the issuance of special tax
bills, warrants, or other evidences of special assessments;
for tha creation and operation of a revolving improvement
fund; and/or for special-assessment bonds secured by special
~..
assessments on benefitted real property, Also, in accordance
C-14
{ iC with Section 6-1 of this charter, general-obligation bonds may
also be secured by special assessments on benefited real
property.
Section 7-`3. Special assessment to be in proportion to
benefit-Apportioning. Any special assessment for a public
improvement against real property benefitted thereby shall be in
proportion to, and shall not exceed, the value of the benefit
from the improvement. The Council shall establish the method or
methods of apportioning the cost of such improvements among the
parcels of benefitted real property. No special assessment shall
be levied by the City government against any property in excess
of twenty-five percent of the fair cash market value of the
property after giving effect to the benefit accruing thereto from
the work or action for which assessed, `except where all
benefitted property owners waive the above twenty-five percent
limitation and agree to accept on a proportional basis one-
hundred percent of the costs of the improvements. (Reso. 83-41)
Section 7-4. Protests. If written protests as to the -
necessity for any public improvement are made by the owners of
benefitted real property which would bear fifty percent or more
of the estimated cost of the improvement, the improvement shall
not proceed until the protests have been reduced so that the
property of those still protesting shall not bear fifty percent
of the said estimated cost, except upon approval of the Council
~„ by a vote of at least six members.
Section 7-5. Lien for special assessments. The special
assessments herein provided for, and any lawful charges,
penalties, and interest which may accumulate thereto, shall be a
first lien upon the real property assessed; and the lien shall be
of the same character and effect, and shall be enforceable in the
same manner, as a lien for general taxes.
Section 7-6. All real
menu . All benefitted real
from taxation in accordance
cost of public improvements
article unless specifically
law.........
property liable for special assess-
property, including such as is exempt
with law, shall be liable for the.
assessed in accordance with this
exempted From special assessments by
ARTIC 8
FRAN RISES
Section 8-1. How grant A franchise permitting the use
of the streets, alleys, bri qes, easements, and other public
places of the City in the urnishing of a public-utility service
to the City and its inha Cants may be granted to a person,
extended, renewed, or a ended only by a non-emergency ordinance
passed by the Council, accepted as provided hereinbelow by the
C-15
(City of Kenai
Supp. /P24 - 9/27/83)
fit' ~ "SS-F~ I~ ^"~w3r~^-M~~'~'ryir c4 'C' "aTy,. j, "'..-y~..~- P~~"'z' ~'L,"Sr '3.,~.':'~'G }.
~~..,,X ~r'a"'~`''~+8. A'j1kSY `va"': y~ fit",,,. r~ ^l"t a p~/
x*~o-ixa ~..'°+".~.~ ''r",,.zs<+w~~~~*~~ i~`~^"'~'`~~a ~~C~ ~~, 4` ¢y~~'~y~' ~~''~v_-,
r ~~.~, ~ y~4, ~ ~YCITY=OF KENAI'" ~~``-°`
~~
~~ _~-~ 'Special Election "of lylay X17 1977
,~
+~-~aS•' "~..-sf.~,zy~~ -.. .~......,~?.+-1i! ~twa wa^t. 3r£ y-t.^`l.u~''~"Ifa3 t•{, "~'f>.+FY+r, ,'i.'.~.x'S .,+:~Y r;
r _
'' s " The~last sentence of Section 7 3 of~ the Charfef of the City of Kenar
`reads as follows: -ax ~~' !k?srvr~s }r' a..r-; w, .
"'No special asseument shall 6e levied by the City government „
- `<_` against any property in excess of 25% of the fair cash market
': value of the property after giving effect to the benefit accru- " '
: ing thereto from the work or actmn for which assessed .- -
r ryd ~r ~
.-fi tom, ~, +
Shall such sentence be amended to read as followsl ~• ~ e
_ _ - a ',The Council shall provide for payment of specie) assessments ,~~,. '.
'either in ane sum ar in yearly installments. No yearly install- ~`
- ~: ment may exceed- 25% of the assessed 4elue `of fhe property ° -
= affected. ~,. r.rc ..r s s Y ;,. X~}:7 '~u~w ,~ i -~a. -
- >' ~. -
r ~
- _ r ., tic'" .EE _ ;_ -q......a:T, ~..3"1d'S3."3^~2 z ra
-And, Section 7-4 of the Charter of the Cify of Kenai reads as follows.
_ _ ' Protests ~~ `itt ~ Ns £ 't r "'cv ~rrisr •t'rM r+ * -
~lSec+ion 7.4: If wntten pro,esfs as to the necessity for any
;public improvement are made by the owners~of benefitted real
' ::;;property which would bear fifty percent or more of the esti- ,, -
- " ~,matedcost of .the improvement, the improvement~~shall riot ~S ,. -
'pr'oceed until the protests have been reduced,sothaf the pro-
_ ~ "perfy of those still protesting sha(I :not bear,{iffy percent of ,r,~ ' -_-
' ~ the said estimated cost, except upon approval of the Councl
-.. ~ ~ ~ ~',by a vote of at least six r^embers ' ~. - r' ~""Sriro a'-
r r ;4i e s ~ z
"' 1 Section 7.4 be amended to readmits entirety as follows.~~'
_ Shal
Protests Sn ~i^=.. .`:.`. ~? ~'.-s~ isi
- ~ "Section 7-4: The City shall not proceed wdh Deny pubLc im- "
;provemen+for which especial assessment district is~tobe
formed until is has received whiten approval~to proceedfrom
_ sthe owners of properties bearing 50% or mere ofthe estimat-
'ed cost of the improvement _ ~- vs t~ J,,.j._
_ .»r.
`- And, shall a new Section b-5 be added to the Charter of the City of
~~,r,^.y, ,~~ Kenai which shall read initsentirety as followsl ,,,~'. ~ -
G ,.^,- .
SPECIALASSESSMENr gdniDS ~ „-. .:..
- Section b-5: The City shall have~the power to borrow money
- - to pay ail or par} of the test of local improvements in special
_ _ - - - assessment districts and to issue special asssssment bonds or
- other evidences of indebtedness, therefor, the principal and
interest of which are payable solely out of the special assess-
men} levied against the property to be benefitted by fhe im-
provements. Such special assessment bonds shall be authoriz-
ed by the Council by ordinance and no ratification by the
voters of the City shall be required. The property benefitted
may be pledged by the Council fio secure apayment-
YES ^ 7S-
NO ^ fb7
Idormafion to Voters £upplied on fhe Back
' .. ...: -
y r3 -
16.05-16.05.010
Title 16
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Chapters•
16.05 General Provisions
16.10 Procedure
16.15 _ Benefited Property Outside District
16.20 Collection of Assessments
Chapter 16.05
GENERAL PROVISIONS
_:
r..
,'Sections.., ,,..
16.05.010 Assessment Authority.
16.05.020 -.How Improvement Proposal Initiated.
16.05.030 __ Requirements of Petition.
16.05.040 Contents of Resolution.
16.05.050 Permissible Methods for Financing
Local Improvement Districts.
16.05.060 Authorized Capital Improvements.
16.05.070 Property Assessed.
16.05.080 Amount Assessed.
16.05.090 Costs.
16.05.100 Method of Assessment.
16.05.010 Assessment Authority: (a) The City Council may
assess against the property of a governmental unit and private
real property benefited all or a portion of the cost of
constructing or improving capital improvements. any such special
assessment shall be in proportion to, and shall not exceed, the
value of the benefit from the improvement.
(b) All benefited real property, including that which is
exempt from taxation in accordance with law, shall be liable for
the cost of public improvements assessed unless specifically
exempted from assessments for public improvements by law. No
assessments shall be levied in excess of twenty-five (25~)
percent of the fair market value of property after giving effect
to the benefit accruing from the work or action for which
assessed, except where all benefited property owners waive the
-above 25~ limitation and agree to accept on a proportional basis
100 of the costs of improvements. (Ords. 791, 969)
~' 16-1
{City of Kenai
Supp. #48 - 7/15/88)
16/05.020-16.05.050
16.05.020 How Improvement Proposal Initiated: An
improvement proposal may be initiated by:
(a) Petition to the City Council field with the City Clerk,
by the owners of property in the proposed improvement district,
or,
(b) Resolution of the City Council:.- (Ord. 791)
16.05.030 Reouirements of Petition: The petition shall
include a description of the proposed improvements. Unless all
benefited property owners' signatures are required by virtue of
KMC 16.05.010, the petition shall be signed by the owners of
fifty percent (50~} or more of the properties which will be
benefited by the proposed improvement. No property owner may
withdraw his approval of the proposed improvement for a period of
six (6) months after the petition has beep filed, unless
authorized by Council. (Ords.'791, 868)
16.05.040 Contents of Resolution: The resolution of the
City Council initiating an improvement proposal shall include a
description of the proposed improvement and direct the City
Manager to make an investigation and report thereon. (Ord. 791)
16.05.050 Permissible Methods for Financino Local
Improvement Districts: (a) By general obligation bonds:
{1) Local improvement districts for capital
improvements may be financed by use of funds obtained from
the sale of general obligation bonds approved by the voters
of the City of Kenai for such capital improvements.
(2) The principal and interest of general obligation
bonds so issued shall be payable from the levy of
assessments so issued shall be payable from the levy of
assessments against the property benefited, but any
deficiency in meeting payments of principal and interest
..shall be made up by an appropriation from the general fund.
The assessments shall constitute a sinking fund for the
payment of principal and interest on the bonds.
(3) Interest on funds borrowed to finance the capital
improvement prior to the sale of general obligation bonds
shall be a cost of the improvement district.
(b)--By_special-assessment bonds:
(1} The City Council may, by ordinance, authorize the
issuance and sale of special assessment bonds to pay all or
part of the cost of an improvement in a local improvement
district. The principal and interest of bonds so issued
shall be payable solely from the levy of special assessments
against property to be benefited. The assessments shall
constitute a sinking fund for the payment of principal and
interest on the bonds. The property benefited may be
pledged by the Council to secure a payment.
16-2
(City of Kenai
Supp. #48 - 7/15/88)
16.05.050-16.05.090
(2) Interest on funds borrowed to finance the capital
improvement prior to the sale of special assessment bonds
shall be a cost of the improvement district.
(c) By City funds (with or without subsequent recovery by
assessment against benefited property). _
(d} By any combination of two or more of the above. (Ord.
791)
16.05.060 Authorized Capital Improvements: A special
assessment district for a public improvement may be initiated for
any one or more of the following improvements:
(a) Streets, roads, parkways, street lighting, curbs,
gutters, driveways, curb cuts, and sidewalks;
(b) Storm sewers, drains, or settling basins;
(cD Sanitary sewers, including interceptors, collectors,
laterals, and sewer service connections;
(d) Parks or playgrounds;
(e) Off-Street parking facilities; -
(f) Changes in channels of streams or watercourses;
(g) Water supply systems, including water mains, water
distribution lines, water service connections, and fire hydrants;
(h) Public shelters; or
(i) Street, road, parkway and sidewalk drainage, dust
control, or snow removal. (Ord. 791)
16.05.070 Property Assessed: The Council may assess for an
improvement any real property benefited or any interest in real
property benefited, and the property benefited may include
abutting, adjoining, adjacent, contiguous, non-contiguous, or
other property or interest in property benefited directly or
indirectly by the improvement. The property to be assessed may
include any property which is otherwise for any reason exempt
from taxation by law. A benefited property may be included in
whole or in part in more than one local improvement district.
(Ord. 791)
16.05.080 Amount Assessed: The Council may assess 100 of
any or all costs of a public improvement against the parcels of
property benefited by the improvement. Unless a specific method
of computatioh of the benefit to the property is expressly
provided in this chapter for ascertaining the amount to be
assessed against the property benefited by a designated
improvement, the Council shall assess each parcel of property in
a local assessment district in proportion to the value of the
benefits received from the improvements. (Ord. 791)
16.05.090 Costs: The costs of an improvement shall be the
actual costs of the improvement, including acquisition of
interest in land for the improvement, design, engineering,
administration, overhead, professional services, bond costs, and
16-3
(City of Kenai
Supp• #48 - 7/15/88)
16.05.090-16.10.
interest incurred as a result of the improvement, and all other
costs resulting from the construction of the improvement. Bond
interest shall be calculated from the first date when actual
costs are incurred by the City. (Ord. 791)
16.05.100 Method of Assessment: The provisions of this
chapter shall not prevent or be construed to prevent the
collection of assessments or payment in lieu of assessments for
improvements in any other manner as provided by law. The methods
of assessment are described in general herein and will require
decisions of policy by the Council meet current needs. In
general, the assessment rate for any special assessment district
is computed by dividing the total assessable cost of such
improvement by the total number of assessment units. The entire
project is considered as a whole when computing the assessment
rate and applying it to all properties. The cost of installing
the improvement in front of or past any particular parcel of ---~,
property is only one method permitted of assessment. ,,Except as
otherwise provided by law, ordinance, or by Council-approved
policy for a particular local improvement district, costs will be
allocated on a square footage basis extending one lot deep
adjacent to improvements in subdivided areas, midway between
streets up to 150 feet of depth in unsubdivided residential
areas, and up to 300 feet of depth in unsubdivided commercial and
industrial areas. Greater area may be included when assessing
costs for interceptor sewers or water mains providing fire
protection. (Ord. 791) ,
Chaoter 16.10
PROCEDURE
Sections:
16.05.010
16.05.020
16.05.030
16.10.040
16.10.050
16.10.060
16.10.070
16.10.080
16.10.090
16.10.100
16.10.110
16.10.120
City Manager Action.
Preliminary Assessment Roll.
Setting of Public-Hearing on Improvement
District.
Notice of Public Hearing on Improvement
District.
Written Objections.
Public Hearing on Improvement District.
Council Action.
Assessment Roll.
Setting Hearing on Assessment Roll.
Notice of Public Hearing on Assessment Roll.
Public Hearing on Assessment Roll.
Correction and Determination of Assessment
Roll.
16-4
(City of Kenai
Supp. #48 - 7/15/88)
16.10-16.10.040
Cl
16.10.130 Resolution Confirming Assessment Roll and
Fixing Payment.
16.10.140 Payment.
16.10.150 Notice of Payment.
16.10.160 Objection and Appeal..
16.10.170 Reassessment.
16.10.180 Supplement Assessments.
16.10.010 City Manaoer Action: The City Manager shall,
within sixty (60) days after the filing of the petition or
passage of the resolution, make a survey of,"and report on, the
proposed improvement to the City Council concerning the need for,
the desirable scope of, and the estimated cost of the proposed
improvement, prospective grants that might be secured to assist
in payment for the improvement, recommendation as to grant.
application, and the recommended percentage of the improvement
plan cost to be assessed against the property benefited. The
report shall contain a description defining the district and the .
properties to be assessed and showing the desirable scope of the
proposed improvement. The proposed improvement district may be
defined by:
(a) metes and bounds description; or
(b) by a designation of the benefited properties to be
assessed by lot, block, and subdivision. (Ord. 791)
e 16.10.020 Preliminarv Assessment Roll: Within thirty (30)
days after consideration by the Council of the survey and report,
the City Manager will prepare and file with the City Clerk a
preliminary assessment roll for the proposed improvement. This
preliminary assessment roll will include the name of the record
owner, a brief description or designation of the property, and
the estimated amount to be assessed against the property. (Ord.
791)
16.10.030 Setting of Public Hearing on Improvement
District: Within thirty (30) days after the presentation of the
preliminary assessment roll by the City Manager, the Council
shall by resolution set a date within sixty (60) days after the
date of setting for a public hearing on the proposed improvement.
(Ord. 791)
16.10.040 Notice of Public Hearing on Improvement District:
Prior to the date of hearing, the City Clerk shall publish a
notice at least once a week for four i4) consecutive weeks in a
newspaper of general circulation distributed within the
municipality. This notice shall include a summary of the
improvement, the designation of the properties to be assessed in
the local improvement district, the purpose of the public
hearing, the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the
fact that a preliminary assessment roll is on file with the City
16-5
(City of Kenai
Supp. #48 - 7/15/88)
16.10.040-16.10.080
Clerk, and information as to
written protest or objection
Clerk shall also send notice
groperty within the groposed
fifteen (15} days prior to t
to the information contained
include a designation of the
and the estimated cost to be
(Ord. 791)
the manner and method of making
to the action to be taken. The City
by mail to every record owner of
local improvement 3istrict at least
ze public hearing which, in addition
in the published notice, shall
addressee's property to be assessed
assessed against such property.
16.10.050 Written Obiections: Objection to the improvement
plan may be filed in writing with the City Clerk until, but not
on the date of public hearing. The City Clerk shall present to
Council at the time of the hearing, all objections filed in
4`rriting. (Ord. 791)
16.10.060 Public Hearing on Improvement District: At the
time and place noticed, the Council shall hold a public hearing
upon the necessity for the proposed improvement. The Council
shall hear all interested persons favoring or opposing the
proposed improvements and shall consider all written objections
filed. (Ord. 791)
16.10.070 Council Action: After the public hearing is
closed, the Council may increase or decrease the scope or value
of the improvement, or may delete form the proposed improvement C
district properties not benefited by the improvement or add
properties which would be benefited and shall adopt a resolution
directing continuation or termination of the modified. improvement
district. No change may be made resulting in an improvement
district objected to by owners of properties bearing fifty
percent (50~) or more of the estimated cost tc be borne by the
property owners except with the approval of at least six (6)
members of the Council. the resolution directing continuation
shall find that the improvement is necessary and of benefit to
the properties to be assessed, and that it is not objected to by
owners of properties bearing fifty (50) percent or more of the
estimated costs to be borne by property owners or, in the
alternative, that it has been approved by at least six (6)
members of-the Council.- The-findings-of-the Council are
conclusive. The resolution shall further require that an account
be kept of all costs of the improvement and that after all costs
are known the City Manager shall prepare an assessment roll for
the improvement. The resolution shall state the estimated
percentage of the costs of the improvement to be assessed against
the benefited properties. (Ord. 791)
16.10.080 Assessment Roll: After the improvement has been
completed and the costs of the improvement computed, the City
Manager shall prepare and file with the City Clerk an assessment
16-6
(City of Kenai
Supp. #48 - 7/15/88)
16.10.080-16.10.130
roll for the assessment district. The assessment roll shall
contain, as to each property to be assessed, a brief description
or designation of the property, the name of the record owner of
the property to be assessed, and the amount to be assessed
against the property. The person in whose name property is
listed on the municipal property tax roll as owner is
conclusively presumed to be the legal owner of record. If the
owner is unknown, the assessment may be made against the "unknown
owner." (Ord. 791)
16.10.090 Settino Hearing on Assessment Roll: After the
assessment roll is filed, the Council shall fix the time and
place for a public hearing on objections to the assessment roll.
(Ord. 791)
16.10.100 Notice of Public Hearing on Assessment Roll:
Notice shall be given for the public hearing on the assessment
.roll as prescribed in RMC 16.10.040. The notice to be published
shall include a summary of the improvement, the designation of
the properties to be assessed in the assessment district, the
purpose of the public hearing, and the time and place fixed for
the public hearing. The notice by mail, in addition to the
information contained in the published notice, shall include the
amount of the actual assessment against the property owned by the
C addressee. Each notice by mail shall generally inform the
property owner of the manner and method of protesting or
objecting to the action to be taken at the public hearing. (Ord.
791)
16.10.110 Public Hearing on Assessment Roll: At the public
hearing, an owner of the property to be assessed shall have the
right to present his objections to the assessment roll by showing
errors and inequalities in the assessment roll and by submitting
any reason for amendment and correction of the assessment roll.
(Ord. 791)
16.10.120 Correction and Determination of Assessment Roll:
After the public hearing, the Council may correct any error or
inequality in the assessment roll. When the roll is finally
determined; the City Clerk shall so certify and the roll shall be
officially recorded. (Ord. 791}
16.10.130 Resolution Confirming Assessment Roll and Fixing
Payment: After the public hearing and determination of the
assessment roll, Council, by resolution, shall confirm the
assessment roll of the local improvement district. The
resolution shall provide for the levying of the assessment
against the property included within the district and may
establish a sinking fund for payment of principal and interest on
any bonds which may be sold to finance the improvement. The
16-7
(City of Kenai
SupP. #44 - 5/8/87)
16.10.130-16.10.130
resolution shall also fix times of payment, schedule of payments,
rate of interest on unpaid installments, the date of delinquency
of assessments, and the penalty and interest to be paid on
delinquent assessments. On delinquent assessments, penalty shall
be in accordance with the provisions of KMC 1.75.010. (Ords.
741, 944)
16.10.140 Payment: Payment may not be required sooner than
sixty (60) days after assessment. Payment may be in a lump sum
or by installments. (Ord. 791)
16.10.150 Notice of Payment: (a) Within thirty (30) days
after the time of payment has been fixed, the City Clerk shall.
mail a statement to each owner of record designating the
property, the assessment amount, the time of delinquency, and
penalties.
(b) Within five (5) days after the statements are mailed,
the City Clerk shall publish notice that the statements have been
mailed. (Ord. 791)
16.10.160 Objection and Appeal: (a) The regularity or
validity of an assessment may not be contested by a person who
did not file with the City Clerk a written objection to the
assessment roll before its confirmation.
(b) The decision of the City Council upon an objection may
be appealed to the Superior Court within thirty (30) days of ~!
confirmation of the assessment roll.
(c) Zf no objection is filed or an appeal taken within the
time provided in this section, the assessment procedures shall be
considered regular and valid in all respects. (Ord. 791)
16.10.170 Reassessment: (a) The City Council shall within
one (1) year correct any deficiency found by a court in an
assessment.
(b) Procedure for notice and public hearing for
reassessment must conform to that utilized for the initial
assessment procedures.
(c) Payments on the initial assessments are credited to the
property upon reassessment.
(d) The reassessment becomes a charge upon the property
notwithstanding failure to comply with any provision of the
assessment procedure. (Ord. 791)
16.10.180 Sllpplemental Assessment: (a) If additional
costs are incurred that are chargeable to an assessment district
after the initial assessment roll has been approved by the City
Council, the City Manager may prepare and file with the City
Clerk a supplemental assessment roll.
16-8
(City of Renai
Supp. #44 - 5/8/87)
16.10.180-16.15.030
(b) Procedure for notice and public hearing for a
supplemental assessment must conform to that utilized for the
initial assessment.
(c) Billings and payments on a supplemental assessment
shall be kept separate from the initial assessment. Supplemental
assessments may have payment terms and due dates different from
the initial assessment.
(d) More than one supplemental assessment may be allowed.
(e) The sum of all supplemental assessments in any one
assessment district may not exceed twenty percent (20~) of the
initial approved assessment roll. (Ord. 1180)
Chapter 16.15
BENEFITED PROPERTY OUTSIDE DISTRICT
Sections•
16.15.010
C 16.15.020
16.15.030
16.15.040
16.15.050
16.15.060
Receipt of Services.
In-Lieu Payment Credited on Subsequent
Assessment.
Liens for In-Lieu Payments.
Initiation of Benefits and "In-Lieu
Payments."
Establishment of Amount.
"In-Lieu Payment" Rate Determination.
16.15.010 Receipt of Services: Real property contiguous to
or adjoining local improvement districts may receive the services
from said contiguous improvement districts if a payment is made
in lieu of assessments which is at least equal to the rate of
assessments within the district. Such a payment may be referred
to as an "in-lieu payment." (Ord.. 791)
56.15.020 "In-Lieu Payment" Credited on Subsequent
Assessment: If an "in-lieu payment" has been made for a public
improvement to a property, then the amount of that payment may be
credited to the amount due for payment of any later assessment if
said property is included in a local improvement district
established in the future for the same service. (Ord. 791)
16.15.030 Liens for "In-Lieu Payments": Any lien created
by an "in-lieu payment" shall have the same priority and
characteristics as a counterpart assessment and may be collected
in the same manner. {Ord. 791)
16-9
(City of Kenai
SuPP. #44 -.5/8/87)
16.15.040-16.20
16.15.040 Initiation of Benefits and "In-Lieu Payments":
Receipt of the benefits by paying an "in-lieu payment" for
benefits of public improvements may be initiated by either:
(a) The initiative of the Council in the event benefits are
being received for which no payment has been made; or
(b} Upon the application of the owner of a property to be
benefited by a public improvement which will be paid for by "in-
lieu payments." (Ord. 791}
16.15.050 Establishment of Amount: If the Council deems it
necessary, the establishment of the amount of the "in-lieu
payment" may be processed as required by KMC 16.10.070 through
16.10.130 of this Code. (Ord. ?91)
16.15.060 "In-Lieu Payment" Rate Determination: After
determination that services from a public improvement should be
paid for by an "in-lieu payment" procedure, rather than by
assessment of benefited property,.then the Council shall
establish rates for such improvements as follows:
(a} For benefits from connection to the water distribution
system, an "in-lieu payment" shall be computed at the same rate
per square foot of property to be benefited as was applied in the
improvement district;
(b) For benefits from connection to the sewer distribution
system an "in-lieu payment" shall be computed at the same rate
per square foot of property to be benefited as was applied in the ~~
improvement district; or,
(c) Other public services other than those enumerated in
this section shall be paid for at a rate to be determined at the
time of application for the requested service. (Ord. 791}
Chanter 16.20
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS
Sections•
16.20.010
16.20.020
16.20.030
16.20.040
16.20.050
16.20.060
16.20.070
Use of Improvements.
Foreclosure of Assessment Liens.
Cumulative Enforcement.
Penalty and Interest. (Repealed)
Payment of Assessments Upon Transfer of
Title.
Penalty.
Proration of Assessment.
16-10
(City of Kenai
SuPP• #44 - 5/8/87)
16.20.010-16.20.030
16.20.010 Use of Improvements: Whenever public
improvements have been constructed by the City of Kenai in any of
the public streets, alleys, or other places of the City and
whenever assessments or charges of any portion of the cost of
such improvements have been made upon the properties specifically
benefited by such improvements, no permit shall be issued by any
City official or employee for any private connection to the
public improvement from any property so assessed and benefited
unless the amount of the assessment or the charges placed against
said parcel of property have been paid, or if the assessment or
eharges are due in installments, unless all payments due at the
time of application is made for the permit have been paid. This
provision shall apply to all cases in which assessments have been
levied, whether void or otherwise, and which are uncollected or.
on which installments are due and unpaid, and all cases where
charges have been made and have not been paid. Nor shall a
permit for any connection to the public improvement be issued by
any City officer or employee for parcels of property owned by the
United States or the State of Alaska without having said
governments pay an equal amount to the assessment otherwise
levied. (Ord. 791)
16.20.020 Foreclosure of Assessment Liens: Assessments are
-liens upon the property assessed and are prior and paramount to
all liens except municipal tax liens. They may be enforced as
provided in Alaska Statutes, Section 29.45.290 through Section
29.45.500. Upon default in a payment due on an assessment
district financed by general obligation bonds, the City Council
may enforce payment of principal and interest, and cost of
collection in a civil action in the same manner and with the same
effect as actions for the foreclosures of mortgages on real
property. Foreclosure shall be against all property on which
assessments are in default. The period of redemption shall be
the same as in the case of mortgage foreclosures on real
property. Monies received from actions taken against property
for non-payment of assessment shall be credited to the Sinking
Fund. Upon default in a payment due on an assessment district
financed by special assessment bonds, a bond holder or the City
Council may..also..enforce payment-of-prinopal-and-interest and
costs of collection in a civil action as herein above outlined.
(Ord. 791, 1174)
16.20.030 Cumulative Enforcement: The collection,
foreclosure, or enforcement of any installment or any part of a
special assessment shall not bar, prevent, or otherwise
extinguish the right of the City to collect, foreclose, or
enforce the payments of any other installment or part of the same
or any other special assessment. (Ord. 791)
16-11
(City of Kenai
Supp. #44 - 5/8/87)
16.20.040-16.20.070
16.20.040 Penaltv and Interest
886)
(Ord. 791, Repealed Ord.
16.20.050 Payment of Assessments Upon Transfer of Title:
All past due installments on any special assessments levied on
property in any improvement district within the-City of Kenai
shall be paid in full with applicable interest and penalty prior
to the time any transfer of title to that property is duly
recorded in accordance with statute. The transferor of the
property shall be responsible for ensuring that the provisions of
this section are complied with. (Ord. 791)
16.20.060 Penaltv: Any person who violates the provisions
of KMC 16.20.050 is guilty of a misdemeanor and punishable by a
fine not to exceed $300. The penalty provided for herein may be
assessed for each parcel to which title is transferred and shall
not bar regular foreclosure proceedings provided for herein nor
be applied on, or as a set-off to, any assessments or charges
against said properties. .(Ord. 791)
16.20.070 Proration of Assessment: (a) Where any property
on the approved assessment roll or for which in-lieu payments
have been established is subsequently subdivided or resubdivided,
then the amount of principal and interest due on such property at
the time of such subdivision or resubdivision shall be prorated
between or among the subdivided or resubdivided lots in
proportion to the benefited area contained in each such
subdivided or resubdivided lot by the subdivider and approved by
the administration.
(b) In the event that any portions of the property subject
to assessment is dedicated for public street or other public
purpose, then the entire unpaid amount of principal and interest
assessed against the original property will be prorated between
or among the lots resulting from the subdivision or resubdivision
in proportion to the benefited area contained in each such lot.
(Ord. 791)
16-12
~!
~.~
(City of Kenai
SuPP• #44 - 5/8/87)
August 11, 1988
TO: Bill Brighton, City Manager
Keith Kornelis, Public works Director
FROM: Janet Ruotsala ~~ - ~/~J~~~
City Clerk ~`
~/
RE: Capital Improvement Task Force
The organizational meeting of the Task Force will be held
Thursday, August 11, 1988 at 7:00 PM in the Council
chambers.
jr