HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-02-15 Harbor Commission PacketKENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983
Kenai City Hall
John Williams, Chairman
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
Present: John Williams, Tom Thompson, Allen Houtz, Leon Quesnel, and
M.W. Thompson
Absent: Paul Weller and Marvin Dragseth both excused
3. AGENDA APPROVAL
Chairman Williams asked to add 9 -a, Property Acquisition
There were no objections
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No Minutes available
5. GUEST SPEAKER
Mr. Waldo Coyle asked to speak on the naming of the proposed harbor
should it become a reality. The name requested was that of Jimmy
Johnson also known as the "Screaming Swede" who drowned while attempting
to rescue stranded people. Chairman Williams indicated that it would
be fitting to name a harbor after such a person who demonstrated a
tenacity that seems typical of many Alaskans.
6. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Kenai River Task Force Draft Report
Chairman Williams went over the draft report for the Commissioners and
explained the reason for the task force for the new members. Chairman
Williams requested of administration to have the secretary attend and
report back. Chairman Williams also explained that use of the river
is a very hot issue between sport fishermen and enterprises on the
Peninsula and especially the Anchorage people. In a letter sent out
statewide from a group in Anchorage, they contested the seating of
Commissioner Weller on the board on the grounds that 70% of the State's
population resided in Anchorage and they should be the body that determines
what should be done with the Kenai River, and they felt that that seat
was reserved for representatives from Anchorage.
KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 2
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983'
6. REPORTS
a. Presentation by TAMS Corporation
Chairman Williams introduced the TAMS representatives indicating that
the first item to be discussed would be the bid documents that had
been prepared at the request of the City. These contract documents
will be for the second ramp.
Mr. Mike Horton presented material to the Commission and administration
and went on to elaborate on the documents. As to the Corps of Engineers
permit, the permit has been applied for to include the fuel float, the
boat grid and the dredging, the permits to be forthcoming upon approval.
Chairman Williams indicated that it is the contention of the Commission
to proceed on to the completion of the contract documents and get it
ready for bid, the city manager to oversee the legal aspects of the
document itself. Chairman Williams asked Mr. Brighton how to proceed
to the City Council in that the money was available to go ahead with
just the ramp portion at this time, i.e. go ahead and get the bids
and ask the Council for recommendation on the bidding or approach the
Council to ask to begin bidding. Mr. Brighton stated that the best
procedure would be to get the bids from the contractors and then go
to the Council.
Mr. Horton went on to point out the schedule set up by TAMS for the
bidding, advertisment, etc. The schedule indicated that approximately
30 days after the bid opening the Council should award for approval
and that looked feasible. TAMS indicated that alot would rest with
the permits from the Corps of Engineers. At this point there seems to
be no problem with the permits in that there is no major change to
require a modification of this portion. Mr. Brighton indicated that
the public works department will be handling most of the details and
will be working with TAMS on this portion.
Chairman Williams asked for a recommendation rather than a motion to
proceed with the finalizing of the contract and the advertising for
bids, the Commission concurred.
Armando Ballofet spoke to the silt and sedimentation study and the
progress so far. At the last meeting, there was discussion over the
velocity of the river. More tests were made and given to the mathematical
model entering 3 sets of data with the end result of 3 knots maximum
near the entrance to the estuary. The first samples taken got frozen and
had to take more. What these 6 valid or bonafide samples confirmed
what TAMS had been thinking all along that most of the silt comes from
KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 3
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983
the mouth of the river at the strength of the flood giving TAMS 600
parts per million Before that samples were taken at the bridge,
these being easy samples to take, and got a concentration approximately
half of that, this makes 5 or 6 times the amount of sediment at the
mouth of the river than further back upstream. Mr. Ballofet went
on to address the the Corps studies and the TAMS study, TAMS doing
an average of the figures developed for all the concentration giving
a mean annual sediment concentration more or less at the mouth of
this basin of 300 parts per million which is half of the Corps testing.
Two methods were applied to determine the sedimentation to the basin
which showed a considerable sedimentation but not excessive.
Mr. Ballofet introduced a new idea for the eventual harbor which consisted
of a channel through the shortest part of the land to a point upriver.
The Commission and TAMS discussed the idea at length, with 40% of the
water to fill the basin coming from upstream creating a self cleaning
situation based on uniform flow in the basin with fresher water coming
from upstream without the sediment flushing out the water on the
opposite tide that brings the sediment in, the mathematical model
predicting the flow back and forth, this becomes an exciting possibility.
The question of fish being disturbed and perhaps wildlife arose and
the TAMS representatives stated that those points are still being
looked into, however there would be very little disturbance of either.
Mr. Horton also stated that there would be no problem with shutting
down construction at any sensitive time TAMS is still investigating
all aspects.
The Commission expressed their interest for the idea and would continue
to investigate it. One more set of samples are to be taken. Chairman
Williams asked if the silt could be controlled on an ecomonical basis
should some kind of a harbor situation be built, Mr. Ballofet indicated
that in his opinion it would be. Mr. Ballofet further indicatd that
the idea of locks was not his favorite in that it is time consuming
and expensive and the amount of sedimentation did not indicate that
extreme but a gate situation may be more in order.
Commissioner Houtz asked what caused the difference in the Corps samples
and TAMS. Mr. Ballofet explained that the Corps sampled only in the
spring tides and then in one general place and on one tide plus TAMS
will have taken 80 samples when completed.
The third part of the presentation dealt with the financial analysis.
Mr. Horton presented the data which would answer what the project would
cost to construct and operation and what the return could be. The state
further wants to know what benefit would result to the local people,
KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 4
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983
local fisheries, and basically set up the whole picture that says
how much comes in and how much goes out, is it worth funding and
to do that they require more and more now a sophisticated package
In order to produce a fairly high quality document you will need
to outline designs and estimate costs so this document will take
care of part of that. Included is an environmental assessment or
early review of all the things that will be critical to getting a
permit. TAMS feels that as things progress toward the overall
harbor project there should be some time set aside for public
participation, their suggestion is to have two public meetings
during the process of the study, the first one being a work shop
at the beginning and ask people to come in and say what they want
and say their peice, both the commercial fishing and the public at
large interests. Anchorage people should be involved to a certain
extent if they wish or whatever the Commission decides to do. This
gives input for ideas to the scheme and to the financial analysis,
then TAMS could present the public hearing with the fancy slide
show, etc. get the final ideas on record and make the final modifications
if needed. Some of the agencies such as the Corps would require this
at some time any way and it would be beneficial to be prepared.
8. OLD BUSINESS
a. Funding for Harbor
Chairman Williams went over the money that was available through the
current budgets for the Commission as presented by the finance director,
the what funds the City will be seeking from Juneau.
Discussion went on as tothe amount of money for future or present
projects. Mr. Horton suggested that with the way the funding is set up
for the grid and the fuel float, there's no way anything can happen
on it until late this year and nothing on -site until next year. If
you wait until that happens and don't do your engineering for the main
harbor first you then have another year down the line to look at, so
this is a means to speed things up a year or two.
Chairman Williams suggested to the Commission that what may be needed
is s recommendation to the Council that administration make determinations
as to the payment of the contract whether it be a hard number contract
or a cost not to exceed contract. Commissioner Houtze asked if the
Commission needed to asic that if it is not evident, be sure it is that
the emphasis is on the general layout of the harbor itself not so much
the sediment control techniques.
KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 5
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983
MOTION:
Commissioner Houtz moved, seconded by Commissioner Quesnel to recommend
to the City Council and Administration that the contract as outlined
in the proposal by Tippitts Abbett- McCarthy Stratton be entered into.
Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote
b. Trip to Juneau
It was determined that Tom Thompson and M.W. Thompson would be flying
down to Juneau on Wednesday 2/23/83 and Leon Quesnel will leave March 26.
Reservations are to be made for them and a report at a later date.
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Land Acquisition
Chairman Williams stated that there are rumors at hand that an independent
oil company seeking to drill a well in the cannery loop unit for potential
gas production and discovery, exploration, etc. There are also rumors
at hand that Union Oil would like to drill another exporatory well in
the cannery loop unit, and further rumors that the potential location
of those wells are on the Coyles property which is the 37 acres which
adjoin the harbor site. Chairman Williams asked for discussion from
the Commission as to if it would be worth the City's effort to prevent
any drilling to take place on that 37 acres or to prevent that 37
acres from being designated as a drilling site. Chairman Williams
suggested a memo be sent to administration that the Harbor Commission
opposes the location of a drill site on that property from the standpoint
of the good and welfare of the future harbor project. By doing this,
the Commission must be aware that they will be interfering with the
property rights of private owners and then have to give some attention
to the potential purchase and use of that ground. Along with a harbor
are associated industrial lease type ground controlled by the regulators
of the harbor that generally are drawn to this type of area.
Commissioner Houtz asked for the amount of money it would cost the City
to purchase the land in question, Chairman Williams related that last
year an appraisal had been done and that while there are no funds
available right now, some additional money may be gained from Juneau,
and of course there is no way of knowing if the funds already needed
will be allocated. Something to keep in mind is the fact that the City
is trying to get rid of City lands either by lease or sale rather than
obtaining more land, the very nature of real estate is that the land
you want is never where you want it.
KENAI ADVISORY HARBOR COMMISSION Page 6
Regular Meeting, February 15, 1983
Mrs. Coyle explained that they had leased to Union and Marathon oil
since 1975, renewed the leases in 1978 and unless they do something
by May they will have no lease. Chairman Williams asked if there
were enough pressure being brought to bear by the independent oil
company that they would excereize their lease by May, Mrs. Coyle
stated that Union would not let their lease go. Union must drill
every 90 days, if they hit a dry hole they must start another one
by 90 days or the participating acreage and the lease is lost,
as well as their unit. What is bringing all the pressure to bear
is that for the first time in the State of Alaska, an independent
drilling company is giving competition to the established large
oil companies. Chairman Williams explained that part of the request
to the City regarding drilling on this land is the fact that the
City must issue a permit for the drilling to be done anywhere.
Chairman Williams asked if the property owners would object to the
Harbor Commission recommending that no permits be issued, the Coyles
would not respond. Discussed followed regarding condemnation
proceedures, fair market appraisal, etc. and the problem lies with
not knowing what lies in the future for the harbor.
MOTION:
Commissioner Houtz moved that the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission
recommends to the City Council and the City Administration that no
permits for drilling or industrial activities on the Coyle tracts,
37 acres adjacent to the proposed harbor facility until further notice
due to the potential use and possible acquisition of those properties,
seconded by Commissioner Tom Thompson.
Motion passed by unaniomous roll call vote.
Commissioner M.W Thompson asked for a dollar amount on the appraisals
for the property in question, it was explained that there were two
amounts involved, one at $15,000 per acre and one at $5,000 per acre.
10. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD
None
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. No meeting
date was set.
Respectfully submitted:
Loper, Secretary
February 25, 1983
TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission
SUBJECT: Request for Consideration and Action by the City Council
Regarding the Coyle Lands
At the regular meeting of the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission on
February 15, 1983, the following motion was made to be directed to
you:
MOTION:
Commissioner Houtz moved, seconded by Commissioner Tom Thompson that
the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission recommends to the City Council and
the City Administration that no permits for drilling or industrial
activities on the Coyle tracts, the 37 acres adjacent to the proposed
harbor facility be issued until further notice due to the potential use
and possible acquisition of those properties.
Minutes of that meeting are enclosed.
jl
Submitted at the request of Chairman Williams
CITY OF KENAI
P. O. 8OX 580 KENAI ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 7535
If
rth cT* :c 0 -erg r= ement 1.. nco
Clement V. Tillion, Chairman
Jim H. Branson, Executive Director
605 West 4th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99510
112 -83
HA1 /FEB83
N E W S L E T T E R
Next Council Meeting Postponed to Late March
Council /Board King Crab Public Hearing Set
Mailing. Address: P.O. Box 3136DT
Anchorage, Alaska 99510
Telephone: (907) 274 -4563
FTS 2714064
February 17, 1983
The regular March meeting of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council has
been postponed until March 29, 1983. The Council will meet jointly with the
Alaska Board of Fisheries on Tuesday and Wednesday, March 29 and 30, in the
Anchorage Westward Hilton Hotel. On Thursday and Friday, the Council will
meet alone in the Courtroom of the 0ld Federal Building at 605 W. 4th Avenue.
If necessary, the Council meeting may continue through Saturday. The
Council's Advisory Panel and Scientific and Statistical Committee will meet on
Monday and Tuesday, March 28 and 29.
An agenda for the meeting will be mailed to the public about March 15. Topics
will include a review of the proposed U.S. /Canada salmon interception treaty
and final action on setting the optimum yield and dates for the 1983 salmon
season off Southeastern Alaska. The Council will review its herring plan
prior to resubmitting the plan to the Secretary of Commerce. Proposals to the
Board of Fisheries concerning king and Tanner crab management will be
discussed by the Board and Council. On Thursday and Friday, the Council will
meet alone to discuss the proposed halibut moratorium and to review a draft
final report on the Council's halibut limited entry study.
The Alaska Board of Fisheries will hold a public hearing on Alaska king crab
management on Tuesday, March 8, 1983, in Seattle. In accordance with the
provisions of the Joint Statement of Principles between the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council and the Alaska Board of Fisheries for management
of domestic king crab fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutians, the Council
and Board will hold their annual public hearing in the State of Washington at
which interested persons and agencies may comment on management of the king
crab fishery. In addition, any comments concerning regulatory proposals for
the Tanner crab fisheries off Alaska will be accepted. The hearing will begin
at 9:00 a.m. in the auditorium of the Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center,
2725 Montlake Boulevard East; Seattle.
The Council and Board will take testimony on regulatory proposals for the 1983
king crab fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, including
alternatives for seasons, harvest and size limits, closed waters, vessel and
gear restrictions, gear storage, exclusive and non- exclusive registration
areas, registration requirements, changes in area, district, and section
boundaries, and additional reporting requirements for catcher /processor
vessels.
Copies of the proposal package that will be considered by the Board of
Fisheries may be obtained from the Alaska Board of Fisheries, P.O. Box 3 -2000,
Juneau, Alaska 99802, phone (907) 465 -4108, or in the Seattle area from the
North Pacific Fishing Vessel Owners Association, Room 218 in Building C -3 at
the Fishermen's Terminal.
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Council's proposed halibut
moratorium for Alaska was published in the Federal Register on February 3,
1983. The 45 -day public comment period will end on March 19.
All Comments will be distributed to the North Pacific Council prior to their
late March meeting at which the moratorium will be a major discussion item.
The Council's final recommendations will then be forwarded to the Secretary of
Commerce as a comment on the Proposed Rule. If the Council decides to
recommend a moratorium they will draft a Final Rulemaking to aid the Secretary
in implementing a moratorium prior to the opening of halibut season on
June 16.
HA1 /FEB83
Proposed Rule on Halibut Moratorium Published in Federal Register
February 18, 1983
Marvin Draaseth
Box 224
Kenai, AK 99611
Dear Mr. Dragseth:
It is with plea
to the City of
S icerely,
Ronald A. Mals
Mayor
RM:jw
sure that the Council confirms your re- appointment
Kenai Harbor Commission for the 1983 -86 period.
on
CITY OF KENAI
at ec al (1/624a
P. O. BOX 580 KENAI, ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 7535
�.Jyytiv��+it
February 2, 1983
TO: City Administration, Commissions and Staff
With deep personal regret I leave the office of Mayor to assume
duties with the State in Juneau.
The expertise and dedication you have demonstrated to our
citizens is now a knowledge I have gained. May I leave you with
my most sincere respect and thank you for all the kindness you
have shown.
Best wishes and success to each of you in your career. Our City
is greater because of your efforts.
Sincerely,
c- e
Vincent O'Reill
Mayor
VOR:jw
CITY OF KENAI
"a eapiird 4 ,4tas4a
P. O. BOX 580 KENAI. ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 7535
TO
ntarLY At TINT 'O.+ Or
REGULATORY FUNCTIONS BRANCH
(907) 279- 4123
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ALASKA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
POUCH 898
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99506
a2
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: February 18, 1983
EXPIRATION DATE: March 18, 1983
REFERENCE NUMBER: 071- OYD -2- 830037
WATERWAY NUMBER: Kenai River 113
Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received
for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United
States, as described below and shown on the attached plan.
APPLICANT: City of Kenai, P. 0. Box 580, Kenai, Alaska 99611.
LOCATION: Near 9th Avenue and K Street, Kenai, Alaska; at Section 9,
T. 5 N., R. 11 W., S.M.
WORK: To reconstruct an existing authorized boat ramp to include an
additional 16' wide by 224' long launch ramp, a pile supported grid, a 150'
floating fuel dock with access ramp, a timber bulkhead with 100 cubic yards
(cy) of gravel backfiil and a pile supported 300' long sedimentation
barrier. Also proposed is the dredging of 90,000 cy of material for a boat
basin. The dredged material will be disposed of at an upland site and used
at assorted city projects.
PURPOSE: Public boat ramp and moorage area.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Contact applicant's agent at TAMS Engineers, 4791
Business Park Boulevard, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 telephone (907) 276 -6565.
AUTHORITY This permit- will be issued or denied under the following
authorities:
(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States
Section 10, River and Harbor Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be
issued until a certification or waiver of certification as required under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95 -217), has been received
from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended by 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3), requires
the applicant to certify that the described activity affecting land or water
uses in the Coastal Zone complies with the Alaska Coastal Management
Program. A permit will not be issued until the Division of Policy
Development and Planning has concurred with the applicant's certification.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment
period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider
this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The property described is not a registered or eligible
property in the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: Preliminarily, this described activity will not affect
endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as endangered or
threatened, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). Formal
consultation under Section 7 of the Act is not required for the described
activity.
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT: Evaluation of the described activity will include
conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain standards;
consideration of alternative sites and methods of accomplishment; and
weighing of the positive, concentrated and dispersed, and short and
long -term impacts on the flood plain.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an
evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the
proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the
national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposals must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments.
All factors which' may be relevant to the proposal will be considered
including the cumulative effects thereof; among these are conservation,
economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural
values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land
use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply
and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the
people.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this
office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become
part of the record and be considered in the decision. If further
information is desired concerning this notice, contact Mrs. Ruth E. Benbow
at (907) 552 -4942 or 279 -4123.
A plan, Notice of Application for Certification of Consistency with the
Alaska Coastal Management Program, and Notice of Application for State Water
Quality Certification are attached to this Public Notice.
Attachments
District Engineer
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
KENAI
AIRPORT
1;NAl RIVER N.
60 32'42"N
4 1-1M. i9
EEXISTINC1 LAUNCHINCa RAMP 14100RINki
FLOAT ARANCIE.D AND .XPANDD TO
INGt UDC AN ADDITIOUA- I� W, x KA' L.
LAUNCH RAMP.
D D (SHAD;D )E.A
SSDIM -NTATION
6ARRiP -R
PLAN
100 400
1
SCALE IN FEET
BOAT GRID,FUEL FLOAT
PURPOSE; ENLARGE LAUNCH RAMP
DATUM: M.L.L.W. N.O.S
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
PORT OF KENAI
14Q6ILa RE.S112cOM
LOCA1ION
2- I0,00 GAL. PJEL
51oQAc a TANKS
(ASOVG oJNO)
A 2& TF4 CON IQM
DIKE
TIM��R SoA"f
ABG21D AND AC
572:w1UFM
ti
TOP or PLANK
K 3Tm=T
hn<YXX
DREDciINC.1
D! ®DISfoSA
A2EAu
Var
tk
o
SCALE IN FEET
AVER LGOP
VICINITY MAP
(FROM U.S.G.S. KENAI C-4)
\OT -S;
L DR 90,00o G.Y. Or
AIJULAIZ ACID SILTY
MA i aRIAL 8Y GI 5}-15.1. 4.
0Z DZALI
2. FUE .L FLOAT INCLUDE FUEL.
015PCNS=RS AND Cx
oFFIG�,
3. SELF GoIJTAI.J D MoSIL!✓
2ESTROOM wj E-ZDI "TANK.
TO LDOP ROAD
KENAI RIVER 113
PROPOSED DREDGING BOAT GRID,
FUEL FLOAT,B SEDIMENTATION
BARRIER
IN: KENAI RIVER,MILE 1.8
AT KENAI,ALASK4
KENAI PENINSULA BUROUGH,AK
APPLICATION BY: CITY OF KENAI
DATE: 7 /JAN. /83
SHEET 1 OF 2 (REVISED)
57� L caUIDG PIL
A A0' -0" O.G, SPAC[ J&
GOtJC•, PLANKS LTYP,)
1
i
1 TIM'S R 3ULKH_AD
U WALL
DRE7 AR2A
H.T.L.-e26.5
M.N.W. +19.1
TIMBEZ w 2x
PLAT roZ M
M. L.L.W. 0.
M.H.W. *1`1•I
M.L.L.W, 0,0
ca.L. -fo
2
#NOTE ;SP1 FLOAT' GUIDE PILES
21 DU0.1IJca WIN'jaR
2
WA 1 f
PORT OF KENAI
DfK aLJO5
,1 u
I i Lra TIM&SR (TYR)
I STEEL PIPE PILES
23 5 -0
DECK
0
•NF F'.. is 6 Wi
SGzv�E FLOAT
SNI "eD 8- FaT i0
LEFT of ExIS'tINCa
Loc ATIOIJ
I6'- 0
26 -0u
�u KNrAD
RILL
BOAT GRID,FUEL FLOAT
PURPOSE: 8 ENLARGE LAUNCH RAMP
DATUM M.L.L.W., N.O.S.
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
71M E% S ii ca21D
A -cESS SWUM
0
SECTION A -A
711 WALKWAY
s TURa
�TIM�2 PILES
12 57K�L PIPE PILES
0 10
SECTION
41 -4 Ex1S7, ZAMP
A 3 4 3
B -B
SECTION C -C
0 5 10 15
SCALE IN FEET
KENAI RIVER 113
3 _JI
DRaDraE
20
CaAVE FILL
30
SCALE IN FEET
x, GKoU1da
40
r PILe C.O.
5
51.0
PROPOSED PROPOSED DREDGING,BOAT GRID,
FUEL FLOATS,& SEDIMENTATION
BARRIER
N KENAI RIVER,MILE 1.8
AT :KENAI,ALASKA
KENAI PENINSULA BUROUGH,AKI
APPLICATION BY :CITY OF KENAI
DATE :7 /JAN. /83
SHEET 2 OF 2 (REVISED)
01404H
Sin Y. [USE
Attachment 2
0 FYI cz tf
STATE OF ALASKA
G RN
DIVISION OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
DIVISION OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
Notice of Application for
Certiftcatior. of Consistency with the
Alaska Coastal Management Program
GILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR
Phone 46S -3512
P ouch AD Juneau 99811
Notice is hereby given that a request is being filed with the Division
of Policy Development and Planning for concurrence, as provided in Section
307 (c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended [P.L.
94 -370; 90 Stat. 1013; 16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)(3)3 that the project described
in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. 071 OYD 830037
will comply with the Alaska Coastal Management Program and that the
project will be conducted in a manner.consistent with that program.
Any person desiring to present views on considerations pertaining to the
project's compliance or consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management
Program may do so by providing his views in writing to the State Clear-
inghouse, Division of Policy Development and Planning, Office of the
Governor, Pouch AD, Juneau, Alaska 99811, within 20 days of publication
of this notice.
@EllQ Y
STA
ML,1
PT. OF EINV 3ONNEN 't L CONSEWVATION
465 -2601
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
Any applicant for a Federal license or permit to conduct any activity
which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters must first
apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation that any such discharge will comply with the
Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217), the Alaska Water Quality Standards
and other applicable State laws. By Agreement between the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
application for a Department of the Army Permit may also serve as applica-
tion for State Water Quality Certification when such certification is
necessary.
Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the
Army Permit described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No.
071 0YD 830037 also serves as application for State Water Quality
Certification from the Alaska Departnent of Environmental Conservation,
as provided in Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217).
The Department will review the proposed activity to insure that any dis-
charge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced pro-
ject will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217) the Alaska
Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws.
Xny person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the pro-
posed project may do so by writing to:
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
Southcentral Regional Office
437 "E" Street, Second Floor
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Telephone: 274 -2533
within 30 days of publication of this notice.
Attachment 3
BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR
.4.102 BU0M11
116PLY 10
001,11410:04 01.
REGULATORY FUNCTIONS BRANCH
(007) 279- 4123
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ALASKA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
POUCH 898
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 09506
PURPOSE: Commercial fish unloading facility.
Lor
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: February 18, 1983
EXPIRATION DATE: March 18, 1983
REFERENCE NUMBER: 071- 0YD -2- 830040
WATERWAY NUMBER: Kenai River 112
Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received
for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United
States, as described below and shown on the attached plan.
APPLICANT: Royal Pacific Fisheries, Inc., P.O. Box 4100, Kenai, Alaska
99611.
LOCATION: One half mile southeast on Beaver Loop Road, Kenai, Alaska,
Section 4, T. 5 N., R. 11 W., S.M.
WORK: To construct a fish unloading facility for use during the summer
months. The proposed project would include constructing the following: a
165' trestle supported on steel piles, two dolphins supported on steel
piles, a concrete bulkhead with 125 cubic yards of backfill, and a 35'x110'
floating structure moored to face of dolphins during summer months.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: •Contact Marvin Dragseth, President, Royal Pacific
Fisheries, Inc., P.0, Box 4100, Kenai, Alaska 99611, telephone (907)
283 -9370 or 283 -9281.
AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following
authorities:
(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the Uni ted States
Section 10, River and Harbor Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
WAFER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be
issued until a certification or waiver of certification as required under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95 -217), has been received
from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal
Lone Management Act of 1972, as amended 1y 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3), requires
the applicant to certify that the described activity affecting land or water
uses in the Coastal Zone complies with the Alaska Coastal Management
Program. A permit will not he issued until the Division of Policy
Development and Planning has concurred with the applicant's certification.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment
period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider
this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The property described is not a registered or eligible
property in the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: Preliminarily, this described activity will not affect
endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as endangered or
threatened, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). Formal
consultation under Section 7 of the Act is not required for the described
activity.
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT: Evaluation of the described activity will include
conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain standards;
consideration of alternative sites and methods of accomplishment; and
weighing of the positive, concentrated and dispersed, and short and
long -term impacts on the flood plain.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an
evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the
proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the
national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposals must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments.
All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered
including the cumulative effects thereof; among these are conservation,
economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural
values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, and
use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply
and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the
people.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this
office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become
part of the record and be considered in the decision. If further
information is desired concerning this notice, contact Donald Rice at (907)
552-4942 or 279 -4123.
2
A plan, Notice of Application for Certification of Consistency with the
Alaska Coastal Management Program, and Notice of Application for State Water
Quality Certification are attached to this Public Notice.
Attachments
District Engineer
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
3
H
GoJG.
2OL NW
&il ?oCr.D
Pert. at5
(z2CDb)
EBB
DATUM
A0.3AC
CITY
OF
KENAI
KENAI 'L
IVER
BEAVER LO
ti
e
v
FLOOD
L
‘of z. �21p�r
5Jp?O T 5ilf' OZj P
?It E
?IL <5 (-4 2Ca'p)
ca. Qez.
(ALL .aaoVC
M4N)
KENAI
RIVER
PURPOSE DOCKING Q FISH UNLOADING
M.1_.L ,W. N.O.S.
NT PROPERTY OWNERS:
SALAMATOF SEAFOODS, INC.
(7) PORT OF KENAI
h
2
Cow,
l3I1L/C-IrICap
KENAI AIRPORT
j EL 21DE. S,ZJG`JRC
D.‘e/LI I (-4 t2E2
e0HOvAsI -E- OT2J4J2E: (ApF
Mooe- D TO POLF'HINs
PLAN
O 10 20 30 40
SCALE IN FEET
FACILITY
PROJECT
SITE
60 33' 21 N
KENAI RIVER 112
KENAI SPUR!
PROPOSED PIER
IN KENAI RIVER
AT KENAI ALASKA
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH,AKI
APPLIC /.T!ON BY
ROYAL PACIFIC FISHERIES, INCJ
DATE 7/ JAN /82 gg
SHEET 1 OF 2
35.'
12 e
F,T.L
TWIA"). RLE-5
24h L11J1iq
-rXI for
AROJJ7
l y�—
_I p e Lz0
el 5 t,
u PILc.
PI LES
CCMO'z,F2)LC
O.41 '512
Mot '._D rO Pr.ALP.a45
cri
1
200'
165
87e L DeIDaL 61204 E:
Iaemecr2 D
4
am III PLA
0
_2o 0 .r==.L. PIPE-
P cw c2.r r LLED
TYPICAL MOORING DOLPHIN
0 10 20 30
C 1 u"F`fr
SCALE IN FEET
PURPOSE DOCKING EA FISH UNLOADING
M.L.L.W., N.O.S.
PROPERTY OWNERS
DATUM
ADJACENT
PORT OF K ENAI
r4
APc Ly.. -s
TYPICAL SECTION
10
20
SCALE IN FEET
FACILITY
40
ALL
GOkic
8 pJLc4
`;TLF-_L
Pll -E
KENAI RIVER 112
G 51 Jew
PROPOSED PIER
IN KENAI RIVER
AT KENAI ALASKA
KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH,AK
APPL ICATION DY
ROYAL PACIFIC FISHERIES, INC.
DATE 7/ JAN /83
SIZE ET 2 OF 2
01-A3LN
11
Attachment 2
Ong g CE1 717113 AD i7 PR M v-0 O
DiVisiON OF, POLICY D'EVao. MEN7 ANO P
STATE OF ALASKA
DIVISION OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
Notice of Application for
Certification. of Consistency with the
Alaska Coastal Management Program
BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERWJR
I
Phone 405.2512
Poudi AD eunebu 99811
Notice is hereby given that a request is being filed with the Division
of Policy Development and Planning for concurrence, as provider.] in Section
307 (c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended (P.L.
94 -370; 90 Stat. 1013; 16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)(3)1, that the ,project described
in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. 071- OYD -2- 830040
will comply with the Alaska Coastal Management Program and that the
project will be conducted in a manner. consistent with that pros rat.
Any person desiring to present views on considerations pert�irsin, to the
project's compliance or consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management
Program may do so by providing his views in writing to the State Clear-
inghouse, Division of Policy Development and Planning, Office of the
Governor, Pouch AD, Juneau, Alaska 99811, within 20 days of publication
of this notice.
Em'; T.1 ON`. IENTMM.COINS Vi1:111
465 -2601
within 30 days of publication of this notice.
Attachment 3
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR
STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR
NEC_
FEB
CY CITY
11
J
983
1TION
P.ny applicant for a Federal license or permit to conduct any activity
which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters must first
apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation that any such discharge will comply with the
Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217), the Alaska Water Quality Standards
and other applicable State laws. By Agreement between the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
application for a Department of the Army Permit may also serve as applica-
tion for State Water Quality Certification when such certification is
necessary.
Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the
Army Permit described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No.
071 OYU 2 830040 also serves as application for State Water Quality
Certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation,
as provided in Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217).
The Department will review the proposed activity to insure that any dis-
charge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced pro-
ject will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217) the Alaska
Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws.
Any person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the pro-
posed project may do so by writing to:
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
Southcentral Regional Office
437 "E" Street, Second Floor
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Telephone: 274 -2533
Pacific Northwest Waterways Association
A N N O U N C E M E N T
o Regulatory Reform
o Waterway User Charges
o Waterway Dredging Maintenance
o Columbia Gorge Status
P.O. Box 61473 Vancouver, WA 98666 (206) 699 46o
February 15, 1983
To: PNWA MEMBERSHIP
From: STEVE LINDSTROM, Executive Vice President
Subject: 1983 MISSION TO WASHINGTON, April 10 -14, 1983
We have selected a number of issues of urgency which will
highlight our Mission Program:
FEB 1 8 1983
Enclosed is your registration form for the 1983 Mission to
Washington, D. C. If you intend to participate in this year's
Mission, please complete the form and return it to PNWA
Headquarters immediately. If more than one person in your
organization might be interested, please feel free to duplicate
and distribute this announcement and the Registration Form.
It is essential that you consider participating in the Mission.
PNWA and the Northwest and Alaskan regions of our area will
be vitally and permanently affected by legislative and
administrative activities in Washington, D. C.
In order for our voice to be heard, we must present a diverse
but united appeal during the 1983 Mission on behalf of our
goals and programmatic needs.
Nothing can compare with the impact of a personal visit to
members of Congress, Capitol Hill staff members, federal agency
personnel and members of the Reagan Administration. We will
again provide a program that maximizes these personal contacts
at policy making levels. Going to Washington as a group
enables us to reinforce both our PNWA needs and our individual
needs as members of PNWA.
The Mission Planning Committee and a Mission Planning Question-
naire have provided several suggestions that will strengthen
and improve this year's Mission.
1983 MISSION Registration Page 2
o Export Opportunities
o Continued relief from Mt. St. Ilelens
o New Lock at Bonneville Dam
o Energy Policy needed
o Alaska Resource Development
In addition, a select number of specific issues will also be
discussed in some of the meetings.
A major highlight of the MISSION will again be the PNWA
reception at the U.S. Capitol. Members of Congress, staff
members, agency personnel and other PNWA guests will meet over
a table spread with Pacific Northwestern and Alaskan delicacies.
Wine, cheese, fruit, fish and other delectables from our region
are on the menu.
You are invited to provide or suggest inclusion of your favorite
local products. The registration form contains a line for your
donation. The reception continues to be an excellent forum
for the PNWA delegation -to make known PNWA's priorities to
Washington's decision makers.
PNWA will contact each confirmed registrant for the MISSION in
order to complete the registration requirements for the Hyatt
Regency on Capitol. Hill. Accommodations will be available at
a special group rate, held to last years level, for the MISSION
delegation.
PLEASE return the registration form as soon as possible to
allow us time enough to include your name when we print the
"MISSION PROGRAM Also include information about specific
agencies or other entities you would like to visit while in
Washington. We would like to have all registrations in our
office" no later than April 1, 1983.
If you have any questions, or need additional registration
forms, please call us at (206) 699 -4666. FILL OUT THE
REGISTRATION FORM TODAY:
SRL /vjh
Attachment
DELEGATE'S NAME
Representing
Date of Birth
Social Security q
PACIFIC NORTHWEST WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION
1983 MISSION TO WASHINGTON, D. C.
APRIL 10 -14, 1983
REGISTRATION FORM
PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN NO LATER THAN APRIT, 1, 1933
Note: To verify participation or request additional information, call
(206) 699 -4666.
Pacific Northwest Waterways Association
P. 0. Box 61473
Vancouver, Washington 98666
Place of Birth
U. S. Citizen Yes
Mailing Address: Phone (W)
Phone (H)
City State Zip
Agencies I want to visit:
D.C. Arrival Date Time Departure Date
I will be staying at the HYATT REGENCY on Capitol Hill Yes No
Or, my lodging in D.C. will be at where I can
be reached by telephoning
DONATION FOR RECEPTION:
I will be accompanied by: Spouse and /or Children (number)
Spouse /Children) Name(s):
PNWA will contact each "MISSION" delegate upon confirmation of
participation to complete HYATT REGENCY reservation form.
MISSION TO WASHINGTON, D.C. $350.00 registration fee enclosed
Please bill me $350.00 for MISSION TO WASHINGTON,D.C. Registration
or, send bill to:
PLEASE COMPLE'T'E AND RETURN NO LATER TITAN APRIL 1, 1983 DEADLINE TO:
No
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 82 139
Suggests City Council
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, REQUESTING
STATE OF ALASKA FUNDING THROUGH THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET ON BADLY NEEDED
PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES THAT ARE USED EXTENSIVELY BY PEOPLE THROUGHOUT
THE KENAI PENINSULA, ANCHORAGE, AND THE STATE OF ALASKA, BUT ARE
MAINTAINED, OPERATED, AND SUPPORTED SOLELY BY THE CITY OF KENAI.
WHEREAS, there are many facilities inside the City of Kenai that are
used extensively by people throughout the Kenai Peninsula, Anchorage,
and the State of Alaska, and
WHEREAS, these same facilities have unrestricted use and without
additional charge to individuals who live outside the City of Kenai,
and
WHEREAS, these same facilities are maintained, operated, and supporte d
solely by the City of Kenai even though they are benefiting individuals
throughout the State, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding
support for the following:
1.) Library Addition $600,000. This facility has 7,121 cardholders
with a yearly circulation of 69,000 items. Close to one half of
the cardholders are from outside of the City. The facility is
extremely overcrowded and in need of this expansion.
2.) Extend Airport Apron -$2.75 Million. The airport facility hada
174,000 passenger use last year with an expected 200,000 this
year. This is a 60 percent increase over the last two years.
There was 6 to 8 million pounds of fish flown into the airport
last year from all areas of the State including Kotzebue Sound,
Norton Sound (Nome and Unalaklect), Kuskokwim Bay (Bethel),
Bristol Bay (Dillingham and NaRnek), Prince William Sound (Cordova),
and Gulf of Alaska (Yakutat).
3.) harbor Bulkhead, Dredging, and Boat Ramp S1.75 Million. This
Ecility provid es service for both commercial and pleasure boating
to people, a majority of which live outside the City of Kenai.
4.) Float Plane Basin $1.0 Million. The existing float plane basin
is closed down since the airport tower cannot see the water.
The funds would be used to open up a water runway and float plane
parking area. The facility wound got extensive use from hunters
and fishermen from across the Inlet and the Alaska Peninsula. It
would also relieve the heavily overcrowded conditions in the
Anchorage area.
Resolution No. 82 139
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THIE CITY OF KEN.AI,
ALASKA, that the City of Kenai is requesting State of Alaska funding
through the Governor's budget on the badly needed projects of
1.) Library Addition 5600,000
2.) Extend Airport Apron $2.75 Million
3.) Harbor Bulkhead, Dredging, and Boat Ramp 51.75 Million
4.) Float Plane Basin 51.0 Million
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of the Resolution be sent
to Governor Bill Sheffield, the newly appointed DOT /PF Commissioner,
the newly appointed Commissioner of Education, and to each member of
the 1933 State Legislature.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 15th day of
December, 1982.
ATTEST:
/A
Janet Whelan, City Clerk
VINCENT O'REILLY-,_1 YOR
CITY OF KENAI
"Od Caai/at a j 4Czs4a
P. O. BOX 580 KENAI, ALASKA 99811
TELEPHONE 483 7535
Additional Information Concerning the Request of Item 113, Harbor Bulkhead,
Dredging, and Boat Ramp, City of Kenai Resolution 82 -139.
The Kenai Harbor Project has been an on -going concern for the City of
Kenai and regular users for over 20 years. The lack of bonafide harbor
facilities require commercial fishermen to pexitian the Corps of Engineers
yearly for anchorage rights in the river, also requiring commercial canneries
to participate in the same requirements through the Corps of Engineers.
At the present time there is no Coast Guard approved fueling facility on
the river and as a result the vast number of boats are fueled from makeshift
facilities located at various canneries.
There presently are no public facilities available to the independent
fishermen for offloading their catch thereby forcing them to sell to the
established canneries and forcing undue hardships on private markets.
The City of Kenai, with an eye toward the future has undertaken the task
of developing a regional harbor capable of serving upward of 500 fishing
boats now using the Kenai estuary and river systems.
In planning for the future, the City of Kenai recognized that in order to
establish a stable economy and development of public works projects that
will help to enhance and greatly stabilize the economy and serve as a re-
newable resource are most important.
With these facts in mind the City of Kenai, in 1974 became a recipient of
a port facilities grant #204 approved by the voters and the State of Alaska
for planning and engineering, acquisition of land, and construction of
docking facilities in the sum of $715,000. In addition we received a
harbor study municipal grant from the legislature for design and feasibility
study of a small boat harbor in the amount of $500,000. In addition to
these funds the City of Kenai has also received from the 1982 legislative
session an additional $300,000 to expand and repair the boat ramp, install
water Sewer facilities, and preparation of additional docking.
As a result of the reciept of these funds, the City of Kenai has entered
into contract for the purchase of land in the amount of $100,000, for
engineering services of CH2M Hill for $65,000 and the engineering firm of
Tippetts Abbett McCarthy Stratton in the amount of $265,000 to determine
both financial and mechanical feasibility of the harbor systems.
It has been determined that at the present time temporary facilities in the
form of a turning basin, repair grids and fueling terminal are feasible
and economically feasible. These facilities have been designed and require,
to continue, preparation of bidding documents to award certain contracts
that have been requested by the Harbor Commission. The Harbor Commission
thereby requests from the legislative funding in the amount of $1.75 million
for preparation of construction of fueling facilities, turning basin, and
repair grids as well as land acquisition contingent upon the needs of the
facility.
The City of Kenai wishes to emphasize the fact that Kenai's small boat harbor
is being designed with every intention of servicing not only the commercial
fishing but the sport and private boating interests as well.
It is the city's feeling that the funding would be granted to the City
based on the harbor development.: being a regional benefit to all areas
of the peninsula. The harbor facility in the City of Kenai will help to
relieve the congestion at Ninilchik and Homer facilities as well.
The object of the harbor facility will be, 1) to furnish a safe docking
facility for all boating users, 2) to furnish Coast Guard approved fueling
facilities for public use, 3) to provide private enterprise with the assist-
ance in expanding the economy base of the city through development of
fisheries industry, 4) to provide repair grid facilities for intermediate
inspection of ships to a length of 100' and to ensure a safe operation of
those ships, 5) to relieve the congestion and unsafe conditions as a result
of nested commercial fishing boats that face the potential of breaking
loose from moorings and becoming floating hazards to all shipping in the
area and, 6) to ensure that in years to come financial stability will be
enhanced by the creation of this renewable resource industry.
February 25, 1983
TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission
CITY OF KENAI
Oil Cam. 4 41.4x
P. O. BOX 580 KENAI, ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 •7535
SUBJECT: Contract for Proposal Kenai Small Boat Harbor Financial Analysis
and Outline Design /Tippetts Abbett- McCarthy- Stratton, A Professional
Corporation
At the regular meeting of the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission, it was
voted unanimously to recommend to the Kenai City Council and Administration
that the contract as outlined in the proposal by TAMS be entered into.
A copy of the proposal is attached.
Submitted at the request of Chairman Williams
jl
February 25, 1983
TO: Kenai City Council
FROM: Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission
SUBJECT: Request for Consideration and Action by the City Council
Regarding the Coyle Lands
At the regular meeting of the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission on
February 15, 1983, the following motion was made to be directed to
you:
MOTION:
Commissioner Houtz moved, seconded by Commissioner Tom Thompson that
the Kenai Advisory Harbor Commission recommends to the City Council and
the City Administration that no permits for drilling or industrial
activities on the Coyle tracts, the 37 acres adjacent to the proposed
harbor facility be issued until further notice due to the potential use
and possible acquisition of those properties.
Minutes of that meeting are enclosed.
Submitted at the request of Chairman Williams
CITY OF KENAI
AI ca 4 4Lu4a
P. O. BOX NO KENAI, ALASKA 99611
TELEPHONE 283 7535