Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-01-10 Harbor Commission PacketAGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 86 ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF MEETING SUMMARY December 13, 2010 ITEM 5: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 6: OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion Kenai River Recreation Study Final Report ITEM 7: NEW BUSINESS ITEM 8: REPORTS a. Director b. City Council Liaison ITEM 9: NEXT MEETING ATTENDANCE NOTIFICATION a. February 7, 2011 ITEM 10: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/QUESTIONS ITEM 11: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 12: INFORMATION a. Kenai City Council Action Agendas of December 1 and 15, 2010. ITEM 13: KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 10, 2011 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE CONTACT U5 IF YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING: CAROL 283-8231 OR, KEVIN LYON 283-8240 ITEM 12: ADJOURNMENT KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2010 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ITEM 2: AGENDA APPROVAL ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MEETING SUMMARY November 8, 2010 ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 5: OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion /Recommendation Capital Improvement Project List for FY12, FY13, and FY14 ITEM 6: NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion /Recommendations Dip Net Report 2010 ITEM 7: REPORTS a. Director b. City Council Liaison ITEM 8: NEXT MEETING ATTENDANCE NOTIFICATION a. January 10, 2011 ITEM 9: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS /QUESTIONS ITEM 10: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ITEM 11: INFORMATION a. Kenai City Council Action Agendas of November 23 and December 1, 2010. b. 12/2/2010 Kenai River special Management Area Advisory Board Meeting agenda and minutes of 11/11/2010 meeting. IteM 4 KENAI HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2010 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. CHAIR PRO TEMPORE PHILLIP MORIN, PRESIDING MEETING SUMMARY ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL As there was no chair or vice chair, Phillip Morin agreed to preside as Chair Pro Tempore and called the meeting to order at approximately 7:02 p.m. Roll was confirmed as follows: Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Staff/ Council Liaison present: ITEM 2: MOTION: AGENDA APPROVAL P. Morin, W. Nelson, V. Askin, R. Peters, B. Eldridge B. Osborn (excused), T. Thompson (excused) Interim Public Works Director K. Lyon Commissioner Peters MOVED to approve the agenda as presented and Commissioner Eldridge SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MEETING SUMMARY November S, 2010 MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to approve the meeting summary of November 8, 2010 and Commissioner Peters SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 4: PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None ITEM 5: OLD BUSINESS 5 a. Discussion /Recommendation Capital Improvement Project List for FY12, FY13, and FY14 Interim Public Works Director Lyon reviewed the list included in the packet. General discussion occurred. MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to recommend the list to City Council and Commissioner Peters SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. ITEM 6: NEW BUSINESS 6 -a. Discussion /Recommendations Dip Net Report 2010 Lyon reviewed the dip net report included in the packet. General discussion occurred. ITEM 7: REPORTS 7 a. Director Lyon reported on possible property for a drift boat pull out and the wind study. 7 -b. City Council Liaison None ITEM 8: NEXT MEETING ATTENDANCE NOTIFICATION 8 January 10, 2011 No Commissioners reported they would not be able to attend. ITEM 9: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS /QUESTIONS None ITEM 10: PERSONS NOT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD None ITEM 11: INFORIVIATION 11 a. Kenai City Council Action Agendas of November 23 and December 1, 2010. 11 b. 12/2/2010 Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board Meeting agenda and minutes of 11/11/2010 meeting. ITEM 12: ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Commissioner Eldridge MOVED to adjourn and Commissioner Peters SECONDED the motion. There were no objections. SO ORDERED. There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m. Meeting summary prepared and submitted by: Corene Hall, CMC, Deputy City Clerk HARBOR COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2010 PAGE 2 ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER ACTION AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2010 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http:/ /www.ci.kenai.ak.us 1. John Bost, Mikunda Cottrell 85 Co. Presentation of FY 10 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda (Public comrnent limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Persons may give their time over to another speaker present, h.owever no single speaker present may speak for more than. 30 minutes combined on their own and on others' behalf.) *All items listed with an asterisk *j are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (Public comment limited to 10 minutes per speaker) ITEM C: UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (Public comment limited to 3 minutes per speaker) ITEM D: PUBLIC HEARINGS (Testimony limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Persons may give their time over to anoth.er speaker present, however no single speaker present may speak for more than 30 minutes combined on their own and on others' behalf.) 1. POSTPONED /DECEMBER 15, 2010. Ordinance No. 2519 -2010 Amending Title 3 of the Kenai Municipal Code, "Animal Control," to Amend the Definition of the Term "Kennel" to Distinguish Between Commercial and Non Commercial Kennels, to Establish a Notice Process for Kennel License Applications and Renewals, and to Provide for a New Appeal Process of Kennel Licensing Decisions, 2. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Ordinance No. 2520 -2010 Amending KMC Section 7.15.100, Setting Fee Schedules, to Provide for the Establishment of a Fee Schedule and to Require that Changes to Rates, Charges, or Fees of the City Shall be Proposed by the City Manager and be Effective After Approval of the City Council. t2a. 3. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Ordinance No. 2521 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $4,033.18 in the General Fund for State Bureau of Highway Patrol Overtime Expenditures. 4. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Ordinance No. 2522 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by S2,069.53 in the General Fund for Training Funds Provided by the Alaska Police Standards Council. ITEM E: MINUTES ITEM F: UNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM G: NEW BUSINESS 1. APPROVED. Ratification of Bills 2. NONE. Approval of Purchase Orders Exceeding $15,000 3. INTRODUCED /CONSENT AGENDA. *Ordinance No. 2523 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $2,600.77 in the General Fund for State Traffic Grant Overtime Expenditures. 4. OPEN MEETINGS ACT /JANUARY 24, 2010, 6:00 P.M. Discussion /Action Schedule Work Session /Open Meetings Act and Public Records Training. ITEM H: COMMISSION /COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks Recreation Commission 6. Planning Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Alaska Municipal League Report c. Mini -Grant Steering Committee d. Kenai Convention Visitors Bureau e. Reports of KPB Assembly, Legislators and Councils ITEM 1: REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITEM J: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. City Clerk ITEM K: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT 1. Citizen Comments (Public comment limited to 5 initiates per speaker) 2. Council Member Comments EXECUTIVE SESSION None scheduled. ITEM L: ITEM M: PENDING LEGISLATION (This item lists legislation which will be addressed at a later date as noted.) ADJOURNMENT ITEM A: CALL TO ORDER ACTION AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 15, 2010 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http: www. ci kenai. ak. u s 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda (Public comment limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Persons may give their time over to another speaker present, however no single speaker present may speak for more than. 30 minutes combined on their own and on others' behalf) *All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine and non- controversial by the council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. ITEM B: SCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (Public comment limited to 10 minutes per speaker) 1. Brendyn Shiflea, First National Bank Alaska Kenai Community Library Donation Presentation ITEM C: UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENTS (Public comment limited to 3 minutes per speaker) ITEM D: PUBLIC HEARINGS (Testimony limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Persons may give their time over to another speaker present, however no single speaker present may speak for more than 30 minutes combined on their oust and on others' behalf) 1. ADOPTED. Ordinance No 2519 -2010 Amending Title 3 of the Kenai Municipal. Code, "Animal Control," to Amend the Definition of the Term "Kennel" to Distinguish Between Commercial and Non Commercial Kennels, to Establish a Notice Process for Kennel License Applications and Renewals, and to Provide for a New Appeal Process of Kennel Licensing Decisions. (Clerk's Note: Ordinance No. 251 9 -2010 was postponed from the December 1, 2010 in order to allow for a further review of information and a second public hearing. The motion to adopt Ordinance No. 2519-2010 is active and no additional motion to adopt is needed.) 2. ADOPTED. Ordinance No. 2523 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $2,600.77 in the General Fund for State Traffic Grant Overtime Expenditures. 3. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Resolution No. 2010 -64 Awarding a Contract to Cornerstone Equipment Rentals for the Project Entitled, "Kenai North Shore Restrooms /Marathon Park Restrooms- 2010," for the Total Amount of $96,000.00. 4. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Resolution No. 2010 -65 Adopting an Alter native Allocation Method for the FY 1 11 Shared Fisheries Business Tax Program and Certifying that this Allocation Method Fairly Represents the Distribution of Significant Effects of Fisheries Business Activity in the Cook Inlet Fisheries Management Area. 5. APPROVED /CONSENT AGENDA. *2011/2012 Liquor License Renewal Kenai Golf Course (License #4708) ITEM E: MINUTES 1. APPROVED. *Regular Meeting of November 23, 2010. 2. APPROVED. *Regular Meeting of December 1, 2010. ITEM F: UNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM G: NEW BUSINESS 1. APPROVED. Ratification of Bills 2. APPROVED. Approval of Purchase Orders Exceeding 15,000 3. INTRODUCED /CONSENT AGENDA. *Ordinance No. 2524 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $23,000 in the General and Airport Funds for the Purchase of Approximately 20 Acres of Property Described as E 1 /2 NE 1/4 NE 4, Section 31, T6N, R11W, Seward Meridian, Third Judicial District, Kenai, Alaska to be Retained by the City and Reserved for Public Use, and for Airport Purposes. 4. INTRODUCED /CONSENT AGENDA. *Ordinance No. 2525 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by S80,000 in the General and Airport Funds for the Purchase of Approximately 40 Acres of Property Described as SE 1 /4 NE 1/4, T6N, R11W, Section 31, Seward Meridian, Third Judicial District, Kenai, Alaska to be Retained by the City and Reserved for Public Use, and, for Airport Purposes. 5. INTRODUCED /CONSENT AGENDA. *Ordinance No. 2526 -2010 Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by S25,000 in the General Fund for the Purchase of Approximately 7.28 Acres of Property Described as Tract C, Inlet View Subdivision, Second Addition, T5N, R11W, Section 4, Seward Meridian, Third Judicial District, Kenai, Alaska to be Retained by the City and Reserved for the Purpose of Maintaining A Component of the City's Storm Drain System. 6. WORK SESSION /FEBRUARY 16, 2011, 6:00 P.M. Discussion Schedule Work Session to Discuss Utility Rate Study. 7 WORK SESSION /FEBRUARY 15, 2011, 6:00 P.M. Discussion Dip Net Report 2010 8. APPROVAL /$250.00 CO- SPONSORSHIP. Discussion Request for Financial Support Second Annual Industrial Outlook Forum ITEM H: COMMISSION /COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks 85 Recreation Commission 6. Planning Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Alaska Municipal League Report c. Mini -Grant Steering Committee d. Kenai Convention Visitors Bureau e. Reports of KPB Assembly, Legislators and Councils ITEM I: REPORT OF THE MAYOR ITEM J: ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. City Manager 2. Attorney 3. City Clerk ITEM K: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT 1. Citizen Comments (Public comment limited to 5 minutes per speaker) 2. Council Member Comments EXECUTIVE SESSION None scheduled. ITEM L: PENDING LEGISLATION (This item lists legislation which will be addressed at a later date as noted.) ITEM M: ADJOURNMENT Prepared by... Doug Whittaker, Ph.D. and Bo Shelby, Ph.D. Confluence Research and Consulting Prepared for... State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation October 2010 Berl% bc Kona' River Recrea tion Study Major Findings and Implications: .a.. preethVg7 Kenai Ri .r Recreation tudy Major Findings and Implications Prepared by.,. Doug Whittaker, Ph.D. and Bo Shelby, Ph.D. Confluence Research and Consulting Prepared for.,. State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation June 2010 Kenai e Acknowledgements The authors thank Alaska State Parks for the opportunity to study recreation issues on the Kenai River, as well as assistance with several aspects of the study, including.: providing use information, developing the guide survey sample, assisting with our fieldwork, inviting us their patrols, and reviewing study plans, analyses, presentations, or the report. In particular, we would like to thank Don Barber, Tami Carrico, Chris Degernes, Denise Dutile, Alison Eskelin, James King. Jacques Kosto, Jack Ransom, Pam Russell, and Jack Sinclair. We appreciate help from staff at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game on several aspects of the study, including participation in fieldwork, providing boat counts from the lower river, and thoughtful comments on study plans, draft surveys, or an earlier draft of the report. In particular, we thank Robert Begich, Robert Clark, ,lances Hasbrouck, Ivan Karic, Stacie Mallette, Brad Palach, Jeffrey Perschbacher, Bill Romberg, and Tom mania. We thank Robert Ruffner and the Kenai Watershed Forum for providing July 2009 overflight use information on the lower and middle river; Bobbi Jo Skibo, John Eavis, and Branden Born ernann, f rom the US Forest Service for providing use information from the Russian River Campground and confluence angler counts; Janet Schmidt (US Fish and Wildlife`Service),for providing Russian River Ferry information; George Heim for recording daily fishing reports for the Upper River; and Cheryle James (Wildman 's) and Annette Max Finch (Alaska Canoe and Campground) for 2009 shuttle use information. We also appreciate assistance in developing the landowner sample from John Mohorcich and Dan Nelson (KPB). We thank many guides, experienced users, agency staff and landowners who shared information about the river or their trips at focus group meetings, KRSMA hoard or committee meetings, or in the field, including: Natasha Ala, Walt Arthur, Bill Bailey, Tina Baldridge, Duane Bannock, Ray DeBardelaben, Ed Bellyea, Jeff Benkert, John Bernard, Jeff Brooks, Patty Brown, Rik Bucy, Andrew Carmichael, Dohn Cho, Bob Cider, Robert Clark, Joe Connors, Aaron Cooper, Mike Crawford, James Czarneski, .toe Connors, Jenny Davis, Jack Dean, Ray Debardelaben, Richard Dykema, Jack Erickson, Dick Erkeneff, Tom Farrington, Dave Fena, Suzanne Fisler, Gary Galbraith, David Gayer, Ricky Gease, Dennis Gease, Robert Gibson, Michelle Glaves, Dave Goggia, Jim Golden, Carl Grauvogel, Ron Gravenhorst, Victoria Hampton, Shannon Hamrick, Jack Harris, George Heim, Kirk Hoessle, Cheryle James, Pete Jeskie, Tony Johnson, Rick Johnston, Jim John, Will Josey, Ron Boo, Kyle Kelley, Gary Kernan, Mary King, Bruce King, Bruce Knowles, Kyle Kolodziejski, Dwight Kramer, George Krumm, Tanya Lauteret, Nick Lemieux, Ginny Litchfield, Jeremy Lobb, Kathy Lucksinger, Neil Marlow, Ken Marlow, Larry Marsh, Peter Micciche, Scott Misner, Gary Mitchell, John Mohorcich, Bill Niederhauser, Ed O'Connor, Carol Padgett, Mona Painter, Doug Palmer, Ron Peck, Mark Primo, Charles Quarre, Ron Rainey, Bernadine Raiskums, Tom Reale, Adam Reimer, Carl Remniek, Monte Roberts, Erik Route, Janet Schmidt, Larry Semmens, Guff Sherman, Bobbi Jo Skibo, Doug Stalker, Tim Stevens, Jerry Striehy, ,lim Stubbs, Andy Szczesay, Ken Tarbox, Brenda Trefon, Gary Turner, Tvland Van Lier, Ted Wellman, and Robin West. We thank Melissa Arndt, Suzanne Fisler; and Dan Shelby for conducting the onsite survey and observations, or participating in fieldwork. They provided useful reviews of many studv components and offered many insights from tacking with users throughout the summer. Finally we thank over 2,000 Kenai river users, guides, and landowners who took time away from their trips or leisure to complete on -site, on -line, or mail surveys. As their survey comments attest, many users have great passion for the river and strong opinions about how it should be managed. We hope this report conveys some of that passion as well as fair characterizations of the opinions of diverse users_ Of course, inclusion in the preceding lists does not imply endorsement of information or conclusions in the report, These people provided very helpful information and diverse opinions that we have attempted to understand and represent, but we are responsible for how the study was conducted and presented. Ocie Doug Whittaker and Bo Shelby Page Methods Highlight findings October 2 10 o Executive Summary Alaska State Parks commissioned a study of Kenai River recreation use in the summer of 2009. The overall goal was to describe use patterns, user characteristics, impacts and tolerances, responses to impacts, and the acceptability of management actions that might be used to improve environmental health or the quality of recreation experiences. The study included focus groups with stakeholders; collection and analysis of use data; an on -site user survey; and follow -up surveys with users, guides, and landowners. Use data. The study organized use data from several sources, including vehicle or boat counts onsite; ADF &G boat counts on the lower river; overflight boat counts from Kenai Watershed Forum; and launch, campground, ferry, or parking data from other agencies. On -site survey. Users were surveyed at 25 locations on three segments from late May through September. Over 2,300 groups were contacted; 2,180 provided completed surveys (92% cooperation rate), including 896 bank anglers, 691 drift anglers, 466 powerboat anglers, and 127 non anglers. Follow -up surveys. 65 to 87% of onsite users (depending upon the group) provided addresses for a follow -up survey. A final sample of 852 users completed follow -up surveys (65% response rate), including 318 bank anglers, 274 drift boat anglers, 191 powerboat anglers, and 69 non anglers. All 385 registered guides were sent a follow -up survey; 218 completed surveys (64% response rate of those with "good" addresses), including 153 powerboat guides, 47 driftboat guides, and 18 scenic raft or other guides. A sample of 494 landowners stratified by the three segments was sent a follow -up survey; 208 completed surveys (45% response rate). Use levels. Due to an economic downturn, weak second king run, and mid- season floods, 2009 was not a high use year, particularly during king salmon season and the second red salmon run. However, the first red run on the upper river attracted high use, and use levels were "normal" during silver and trout dolly seasons. Characterizing users, guides, and landowners. Questions about "most important" recreation opportunities provided profiles of different groups on variables such as age, gender, residency, Kenai experience, boat ownership, and target species. Most Kenai anglers are men >80 who fish in small groups (2 to 5). Users take diverse trips; for example, 30% ofpowerboaters sometimes use driftboats and 29 of drift anglers sometimes use powerboats. Perceived crowding. A standard question used in many recreation studies shows some Kenai locations and times can be perceived as "very crowded" (e.g., bank anglers on the Upper River during the first red run, drift anglers on the Upper River on Sept weekends, powerboat anglers on high use days on the Lower River; 79 to 98% report crowding). Most locations and times had "high normal" perceived crowding (50 to 65 and a few had "low normal" (35 to 50 or "no crowding" 35 Perceived crowding was higher while fishing than while using facilities, parking, or traveling to fishing. Use- impact relationships. Correlations between use measures (e.g., Russian River ferry users per day, boat counts on the Lower River) and various impacts (e.g., perceived crowding, distance between bank Re anglers, competition for fishing locations, interference from boats) show that higher use levels are related to higher impacts. Combined with information about impact tolerances, data help show when use produces unacceptable impacts. Impacts and tolerances. Similar to findings from a 1992 study, most Kenai users identified tolerances for impacts; only 10 to 20% report that social impacts "don't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish." Example tolerances for bank anglers include less than three line entanglements and fishing at least one rod length from others; boat -based anglers tolerate fishing competition and boat interference no more than 25% of the time. Issue priorities. Follow -up surveys had respondents rank 24 management issues on an "importance" scale; few were rated "not at all" important. The highest ranked issues related to environmental impacts (e.g., litter, bank trampling, wildlife impacts, and powerboat effects on erosion, hydrocarbon pollution, and water clarity), but discourteous behavior of users and boating safety were also important. These are a starting point for high quality recreation. Facility or access improvements and use level issues were lower but also important (particularly for certain sub groups). Higher ranking use issues included boats on the Lower River in July, bank and boat anglers during red salmon runs, and boats on the Upper River during the late summer trout season. Responding to crowding. Most respondents (70 to 90 said they sometimes feel crowded and described ways they respond. About 45% try to avoid others while staying in the same area, and about 30% said they take trips during the middle of the week, at a different time of day, or to a different segment. About 24% go less frequently, 23% resign themselves to a more crowded experience, and 21% becoine dissatisfied. King salmon angling use. Guides reported that several factors affect when, where, and how long they fish for kings, including personal knowledge, personal success from recent days, and seeing others having fishing success. Nearly all agreed that "being first" at a hole is important and that king fishing generally diminishes through the day. Because of this, it may be challenging to address crowding by redistributing use in space or time. Development actions. Among all groups, there is majority support (usually 60 to 75 for development actions including new launches on the lower river, launch improvements on all three segments, new or improved restrooms, and improved trails or bank fishing platforms (especially if this allows some closed angling areas to be reopened). Education and regulation actions. There is majority support (but typically less than 60 for education and regulation actions related to boating safety, including no wake zones or "driving lanes" in congested areas, and requirements for all boat users to wear PFDs. However, powerboat user support for all these actions is more qualified and most powerboat guides oppose them. Powerboaters oppose (but guides support) requiring operators pass a written test for a Kenai "boating license." "Drift only" issues. Majorities of driftboat users (80 driftboat guides (85 and bank anglers (55 support additional "drift- only" days on the Lower and Middle River (there is one day a week of "drift- only" use during the king season now), while majorities of powerboat users (50 and powerboat guides (70 are opposed. Opinions about "drift only" days on one segment at a time suggest "compromise" options may be workable. There was little consensus about the best times for "drift only" days, but support is greatest in higher density periods. The study also reviews other issues that need to be addressed if additional drift only days are considered. Cctobv20i0 Use limit actions. Similar to the 1992 study, about 68% of users say they would never support boating use limits or they are not needed now, while about 20% aright support them (depending upon how the permit system works) and 10% believe they are necessary now. Among those who might support limits, over 80% want limits to freeze or reduce use. Support for specific use limit actions depends largely on who the action would limit. Unguided users support limits on guides or guided use, while opposing limits on all use (which would include their). Guides oppose limits on guides or all users, with the exception of Upper River guides, who support limits on unguided users (complex regulations on the Upper River already effectively limit guides there). There was little support for an all -user registration system that might be used to help redistribute use through information. Less than 20% of users provided estimates of capacities; among those who did, estimates were similar to current averages on high use (but not peak) days. Guided unguided use issues. In response to statements about guided and unguided use issues (developed in focus groups), there is general agreement that some guides can be aggressive and that the number of guided boats can detract from experiences. Similarly, many groups agree that some unguided users have inadequate boats, equipment, or skills for high density fishing. Responses help understand use conflicts, suggesting improved education regulation options might diminish some "frictions" between groups. There is also agreement about "sharing the burden" of reducing overuse, although groups disagree on specific actions. Most disagreements appear to be based on "reasonable self-interest" in their own chances of improved conditions or lost access. Fees. Just under half of all users are willing to pay user fees; drift anglers were the only group with a majority reporting a willingness to pay. Of those willing to pay in 2009, average amounts were $5 to 7 per day and $40 to 50 per season. Visual impacts from riversides development. Most users favor current levels of development (about 55 or reductions (about 20 Of those favoring more development, most prefer slight increases, and less than 5% prefer doubling or tripling development (which current regulations allow). Final comments The following report documents use and impact levels on the Kenai River and support for management actions that might be used to address them. Taken together, information supports a common narrative about the Kenai: there are times and places where use and impacts diminish the quality of experiences, and the river is "not what it used to be." Results also show considerable support for some actions (particularly development and education) to address these problems, but more divided opinion about several regulation options, changes in the type of use (e.g., more drift -only times /segments), or use limits (for guides or all users). Kenai recreation use is a classic "tragedy of the commons" situation there is little incentive for individuals or groups to constrain their own growing use, even though the collective impacts could ultimately degrade the resource. The study provides agencies, stakeholders, and the public use information to discuss the kind of recreation opportunities and conditions they want on the Kenai River, allowing agencies to "manage by design" rather "by default." 2010 Page 'v n Stk n Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 Study objectives 2 2. Methods 7 Agency use information and "count" programs 7 Fieldwork 7 Focus groups and interviews 8 On -site survey 8 Follow -up surveys 10 Analysis 12 Reporting 12 Cautions and study context 13 3. Use Information Characterizing 2009 15 Factors influencing use levels 15 Salmon runs and fishing success 15 Weather 17 Flows and flooding 17 Economic downturn 18 Other potential factors 18 Use level estimates 19 Effort and harvest on the entire river ............................a.. 0 19 Lower River 20 Middle River 24 Upper River 26 4. A Profile of Kenai River Users, Landowners, and Guides 30 Categorizing respondents 30 Activities and segments 31 Percent reporting opportunities 31 Most important opportunities 32 Guided vs. unguided use 34 Camp on the river 34 Types of boats 35 Land ownership and property characteristics 37 Age and gender 38 Alaska residents 38 Hosting and visitation information 39 Experience on the river 40 Trip characteristics 41 Group size 41 Trip lengths 41 Typical boating segments 41 Trip characteristics 42 Target species and fishing statistics 42 Non angler activities 44 October Pace 1 5. Lower River King Fishing Trends 45 Factors influencing fishing locations 45 Early morning fishing success 46 Fishing techniques 46 King salmon trends in recent years 47 6. On -river Crowding, Impacts, and Use Impact Relationships 49 Perceived crowding 49 Perceived crowding by segment season group "context" 50 Crowding comparisons with other resources 52 Crowding during different parts of a trip 54 Impacts and tolerances 55 Reported impacts 56 Tolerances for impacts 59 "Impact problems" 63 Use impact relationships 64 Other relationships among on -site survey variables 70 Crowding and Satisfaction 70 What impacts influence crowding? 70 7. Issue Importance 73 For all users 73 Differences between user groups 74 For guides 76 8. Responding to Crowding 78 General crowding measure 78 Responses to crowding 79 9. Changing Conditions, Past Use, and Displacement 82 Overall trip quality and management 82 Past use and displacement 83 10. General Management Strategies 86 User opinions toward general management strategies 86 Differences between user groups 87 Landowner opinions toward general strategies 87 Guide opinions toward general management strategies 88 11. Recreation Facility Development Maintenance Actions 89 Development actions for the entire river 90 Development actions on specific segments 91 Integrating development findings 92 12. Education and Regulation Actions 94 Education regulation actions for the entire river 95 Education regulation actions for different segments 97 Integrating education and regulation actions 98 13. "Drift- only" issues 100 General support opposition for "drift -only" days 100 How many additional "drift only" days? 101 Preferences for days of the week 101 Preferences for months 101 Prospective use of "drift only" days by guides 102 Developing "drift only" alternatives 104 Conceptual and process issues 104 Specific considerations for drift -only alternatives on the Kenai 105 14. Capacities and Use Limit Actions 108 Background 108 Philosophy toward use limits 109 Should limits reduce, freeze, or increase use? 111 Opinion toward a daily boat registration program 112 Opinion toward parking time limits 113 Specific use limit actions Lower River 114 Specific use limit actions Middle River 115 Specific use limit actions Upper River 116 Estimating boat and guide boat capacities 117 Lower River boat capacities 117 Lower River guide boat capacities 119 Upper River boat capacities 121 Other comments on use limit actions 122 Recommended use level monitoring 124 Lower River 124 Middle River 124 Upper River 125 15. Guided/Unguided Use Issues 126 Statements about guides 126 Statements about unguided users 127 Statements about other guided /unguided use issues 129 Other differences between guided unguided users 130 Other information about guided use 130 Other comments on guided unguided use issues 134 16. User Fees 136 Opinions about user fees 136 Other fee considerations 137 17. Non- Recreation Development Issues 138 Preferred levels of development 138 Opinions toward land use regulations and permitting 140 18. Concluding comments 141 19. Supplemental Report Sections 143 20. References 144 October 2.14` 1. Introduction The Kenai River is widely known as one of the most outstanding recreation resources in Alaska. It has world record Chinook salmon, large runs of Sockeye and Coho, outstanding rainbow and Dolly Varden fisheries, abundant wildlife, spectacular scenery, and interesting whitewater. With multiple access points for bank, float, and powerboat use, the Kenai attracts local, state, national, and international use. This popularity has led to high use densities at some times and places, and many have commented about the Kenai's potential for crowding and congestion (Route, 1994; Atcheson, 2002; Pedersen, 2005). For at least three decades, river managers have been challenged by the social and biophysical impacts of high recreation use on the Kenai. Several agencies or governmental organizations have (sometimes overlapping) management responsibilities on the Kenai, including the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation in the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (hereafter referred to as State Parks), Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G), U.S. Forest Service (FS), U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Kenai Peninsula Borough (KPB), the cities of Kenai and Soldotna, and the Alaska Board of Fisheries. State Parks is the lead managing agency for recreation use on the river and adjacent state land, which includes several State Park units. Designated as a "Special Recreation Management Area" (KRSMA) in 1984, State Park responsibilities include Kenai Lake (14,500 acres); the Upper River (17 miles); Skilak Lake (25,000 acres); the Middle River (29 miles), and the Lower River (25 miles, ending about 4 miles from the mouth at Cook Inlet). State Parks prepared an initial Comprehensive Management Plan in 1986, focusing on facility development, fish and wildlife habitat protection (particularly regulations to control development in riparian zones), and boating regulation (horsepower lirnits and non motorized zones). Plan implementation included a "carrying capacity" study in 1992 -93 (hereafter referred to as the 1992 study), which documented several "impact problems" and support for management actions. A Comprehensive Plan revision in 1997 addressed continuing issues related to recreation use, including facility needs, motorized vs. non motorized use, bank vs. boating use, commercial vs. non commercial use, bank erosion from powerboats, and riparian degradation from bank anglers. The 1997 Plan also identified the need for periodically collected information about recreation use and impacts, including a user survey. Since adoption of this Plan, monitoring or other studies by agencies have addressed some of these needs, but State Parks was interested in a more comprehensive study. A 2004 settlement to litigation regarding proposed Kenai guide limits required additional information about river use and impacts before such limits could be considered. The Alaskan Legislature provided funding for the study in 2008 and it was conducted in 2009 -10. This report provides an overview of major findings and implications for management. It integrates information from focus groups, fieldwork, surveys, and previous studies to assess the "state of recreation" on the river and suggest ways that problems might be addressed. A supplemental report offers additional information about methods and results, including: 1. Use information; 2. Fieldwork; 3. Focus group notes; 4. On -site survey instruments; 5. Follow -up survey instruments; 6. Additional methods information; 7. Additional onsite survey results; 8. Additional follow -up survey results; 9. Verbatim comments from surveys; 10. Notes from Upper River field technician; 11. Excerpts from Forest Service bear incident report Rec a.+ ns Study information will be considered by State Parks, the KRSMA Advisory Board, other agencies, stakeholders, and the public before additional recreation management actions are implemented. Study objectives The overall goal of the study was to describe user and trip characteristics, use levels, impacts, impact tolerances, attitudes toward management strategies, and acceptability of specific management actions. The study was primarily directed at "recreation experience" issues rather than "biophysical" impacts (e.g., bank trampling, boat erosion, hydrocarbon impacts), although respondents were asked about the importance of these issues and some management actions that could be used to address them. The study replicated parts of the 1992 capacity study, but also addressed more recent issues, and collected more specific information about use impact relationships and support for specific management actions. Study objectives included: Describe "study year" use patterns, focusing on daily and at- one -time estimates to compare with survey findings, and developing specific use impact relationships. Summarize trends in use patterns based on existing agency data to provide context for study year information. Summarize "study year" weather, fish escapement, angler effort and harvest, and other potential factors that may influence local, statewide, or out-of-state use. Describe specific geographic distributions of drift and power boat use at high density times and locations. Describe user and trip characteristics for different groups. Assess overall importance of management issues for user groups, segments, and seasons. Assess overall evaluations of use levels and perceived crowding. Describe reported impact levels and impact tolerances for user groups, segments, and seasons. Compare reported impacts with tolerances to define "impact problems." Develop relationships between reported impacts and use levels at specific times and locations (segments and sub segments). Assess public support/opposition for several general strategies and specific management actions that might be used to address impact problems. Assess place and time displacement of current river users due to crowding or other impacts, and describe potential resource /activity substitutions (that may affect use on other regional rivers). Assess proportions of users employing different "coping" strategies when faced with crowding, conflict, or impacts greater than tolerances; Ensure that all information is collected for representative samples of major Kenai user groups: drift, power, and bank anglers; non anglers, guides, and landowners; Collect and organize information by user group, segments, and seasons. The three major study segments are identified in Map 1; more detailed maps for the three segments follow. Compare findings from the present study with those from 1992 when possible. October 2010 an Provide opportunities for agencies (e.g., ADF &G, KPB, USFS, and USFWS) and regional stakeholders (e.g., sport fishing groups, guides, environmental groups, local businesses, and landowners) to help develop issues, impacts, and management strategies to be addressed in the study. Note: Several Kenai management issues are beyond the scope of the study, including personal use fisheries at the mouth (outside the KRSMA boundaries); allocation between sport, commercial and subsistence fisheries; fishing regulations (the purview of the Board of Fisheries); and land management decisions on non -state lands (although results may help federal and local governmental agencies with their decision making). Map 1. Kenai River segments (as used in this report). .10 Map 2. Lower Kenai River (River Mile 5 to 21). Page 4 Map 3. Middle Kenai River from Soidotna Bridge to Sterling (River Mile 21 to 36). Map 4. Middle Kenai River from Sterling to Skilak Lake (River Mile 36 to 50). First Hole T 7 41 Second Hole ---7-'''''''.- .K tower Hate..-wall}to Rai 1-1.cikwil:kr i-111-d114 6 Thifil }foie Keys 4, I i ertai k.44. River fier Hole 46 Thonipsoe's fickl A 7 4, nal National KluileY Super Hole eSS cooper 1(0 Landing La cooper River -17as cam si p 7 mund ck Map 5. Upper Kenai River (River Mile 65 to 82). 2. Methods Several types of information were collected during the study. Summaries of method components are provided below; additional information is available in the supplemental report sections on 1) focus groups; 2) use information; 3) fieldwork; 4) onsite survey methods; and 5) follow -up survey methods. The chapter concludes with several cautions about study findings. Agency use information and "count" programs Several agencies operated independent use monitoring or "count" programs that helped summarize use during the study year or place that year in a larger context. Information sources are listed below; additional details are provided in the supplemental report on use infoinration: Boating and user counts on the Upper River collected by a photo time lapse program (2004) or through "exit interviews" in 1994, 1999, and 2004 by USFWS. Angler effort and harvest data collected by ADF &G creel surveys and the annual Statewide Harvest Survey (SWHS) from previous years. Weekly fishing report assessments by ADF &G during Chinook season. Daily boat counts on the Lower River collected by ADF &G from mid -May through July. Salmon run information (escapement) collected by ADF &G for the study year and previous years. Guide information collected by State Parks. Aerial boat counts conducted for hydrocarbon monitoring by Kenai Watershed Forum and /or Department of Environmental Conservation. Russian River Ferry and Sportsman's launch and parking information USFWS concession). Russian River Campground and Day Use information. Daily Pillars launch and parking information. Monthly use information from State Park units (e.g., Cooper Landing, Morgan's Landing, Bing's Landing, Izaak Walton). State Park ranger counts of bank anglers and boats on selected days. USFS staff counts of bank anglers in specific zones in the Russian River confluence area. Use information was collected in databases that allowed comparisons across different sources, and links to impact information from on -site surveys. Graphs and descriptive statistics were developed to describe seasonal, weekly, and time of day use patterns for different segments. Fieldwork This study expanded field data collection from the 1992 study to ensure "at- one time" use estimates for specific river segments could be associated with the on -site survey information. In addition to the count programs described above, "at- one time" (AOT) boat, trailer, and parking counts were conducted by study technicians at all sampling locations (i.e., visible counts by category for a specific location at a specific time). Several specific observation stations were also established to improve information about geographic distributions of specific types of users (e.g., different craft, anglers using different fishing techniques, guide /non- guide proportions) within certain segments. Stations and protocols are provided in the supplemental report on fieldwork. Periodic fieldwork was also conducted on all three segments during the 2009 season to provide context for study findings. This included on -land, floating, and powerboating trips with ADF &G and State Parks field staff. Trips focused on photographing typical use patterns, impacts, and facilities; learning about k e 2O1O Focus groups and interviews On -site survey a ADF &G count programs; interviewing users; and developing supplemental observations of sub segment use patterns. Additional information about fieldwork is provided in a supplemental report. A series of meetings or interviews with agency staff, stakeholders, and user groups were conducted from January to March 2009 to review issues and help develop survey items. The primary purpose was to review: Conclusions from the 1992 study and 2002 monitoring program, then develop priorities for this study; Impact "indicators" studied in 1992 and 2002, then help decide which should be replicated; s Management strategies studied in 1992 and develop new actions to be assessed in this study; Use and field work data collection options. Focus group meetings were conducted with guides (2 meetings); Kenai River Sport Fishing Association; Kenai Area Fisherman's Coalition; landowners who live on the Kenai Peninsula; landowners who live in Anchorage; Cooper Landing area residents (landowners and guides); long -time users in the Anchorage area (recruited from Alaska Outdoor Forum); and agency staff or KRSMA river use committee members (including staff from ADF &G, State Parks, USFWS, USFS, KPB or other non governmental organizations such as Kenai Watershed Forum). Additional interviews were conducted with individual guides, Kenai Guide Academy instructors, local Chamber of Commerce staff, and landowners. Candidates for focus groups and interviews were developed with assistance from leaders of formal stakeholder groups, KRSMA board members, and other experienced users identified by agency staff. The goal was to have participants represent a diversity of opinions within the identified groups, but many had broad experience with several segments and types of uses. Focus groups ranged from 4 to 15 participants; they were conducted with a single facilitator (Doug Whittaker), and several were attended by agency observers. Interviews were conducted by phone or in person by Whittaker. Interviews and focus groups were structured to cover a full range of topics; the supplemental report on focus groups includes notes from the sessions. Focus group participants and interviewees were invited to pre -test survey instruments. Notes from the focus groups are included in the supplemental report. The on -site survey used similar methods to those employed in the 1992 study. Technicians were provided with a "roving" sampling schedule designed to survey groups of users (bank anglers as they fish and boat based anglers as they take -out) at several locations on each segment through seasons (defined after discussions with stakeholders and agencies). Technicians surveyed one person per group (e.g., 1 person per bank angler group, 1 person per boat) chosen randomly. The technician provided respondents with a one -page survey about users' trips, overall trip and crowding evaluations, and impacts, focusing on evaluations of that day's trip. In some instances, technicians read questions and recorded responses (because respondents were busy de- rigging boats or bank fishing). The survey also asked for contact information (email or mail address), which gave users the opportunity to complete a follow -up survey (see below). 2009 on -site sampling targeted users during angling seasons, but also sampled some non angling users (e.g., scenic rafters, wildlife viewers, campers) who are present during those times. The study did not October 2010 Pa focus on sampling during the non fishing seasons (e.g., before trout season opens on the Upper River). The on -site survey did not target personal use fishery (dip -net) users at the mouth of the river and outside KRSMA (although some boat -based dip netters launch upstream and were included in the sample). The overall goal of the on -site survey was to represent the diversity of 2009 users on the Kenai River, which is related to several variables: Geography (Upper, Middle, and Lower rivers, and by location within those segments) Activity (powerboat anglers, driftboat anglers, bank anglers, and non anglers) Type of use (guided vs. unguided) Time of year (primarily delineated by salmon run timing) Day of the week (primarily weekends vs. weekdays, plus special regulation days) Time of day The on -site survey sampling goal was to ensure that the sub groups of interest had a sample of about 30 for descriptive statistics and analysis. For larger sub groups (e.g., all Lower River powerboaters), the goal was sample sizes about 200, which provide "margin of error" about ±8% (at the 95% confidence level). Sample sizes of 400 (for larger -still groups such as "all bank anglers produce a margin of error about ±5 The 2009 sampling effort had several elements, including: Segment stratification (roughly equal sampling effort by the three segments) Type of day stratification (weekends vs. weekdays); Random sampling by specific days within weekend /weekday strata; Random sampling by time of day (in general, between 11 am and 8pm); Quotas that limited the number of surveys from any given location /tune period to avoid "over sampling" a particularly high use setting; Professional judgments that defined the frequency of sampling by location and season to include a diversity of locations and maintain logistical efficiency for technicians. Minor adjustments based on in- season considerations (e.g., adding more powerboat sampling in late July and August in response to low use levels during king season; reducing some bank angling locations due to no or very low use). The supplemental report provides additional details about the on -site survey sampling plan. Sampling locations included 15 locations on the Lower River (including Pillars, Centennial Park, Eagle Rock, Cunningham Park, Poachers Cove, and River Bend); 13 locations on the Middle River (including Bing's Landing, Swiftwater Park, Morgan's Landing, Izaak Walton, Kenai River Center, Rotary Park, Funny River, and Lower Skilak) and 6 locations on the Upper River (including Russian River Ferry /Sportsman's, Jim's Landing, Sterling Highway turnouts, Russian River campground /day use area. and Upper Skilak). The supplemental report provides additional information about sampling effort and response by location and month. The bank anglers sample included roughly equal samples from both red runs and periods outside red sahnon season. The powerboat sample had unexpected lower numbers from the king runs due to poor king returns, the economic downturn, and flooding in late July; we adjusted sampling to capture more powerboat anglers after July. The driftboat sample was larger than expected because of high use levels on the Upper River. In total, the 2009 study surveyed 2,180 users on -site (including 896 bank anglers, 466 powerboat anglers, 691 driftboat anglers, and 127 non anglers). The survey was conducted over 428 time- and location- October Patle specific "sessions" (totaling 671 hours) at over 30 different locations on over 90 days from late May through late September (34% of hours on the Lower River, 31% on the Middle River, and 35% on the Upper River). Table 2 -1 provides the number of on -site users contacted, the percent who completed surveys, and a "cooperation rate." It also shows the proportion of users who gave addresses for follow -up surveys. Table 2 -1. Onsite survey contacts, refusals, completions, and cooperation rate. Bank Drift boat Powerboat Non-anglers Total anglers anglers anglers 987 709 527 141 2,364 91 18 63 14 185 Completed 896 691 466 127 2180 Cooperation rate 91% 97% 88% 90% 92% Provided addresses for 654 (73 599 (87 302 (65 95 (75 1,650 (76 foflow up Contacted Refused Content for the on -site survey was developed from the 1992 study and revisions were suggested by focus groups and interviews. The survey was pre tested by focus group participants and agency staff. Technicians were trained to provide a consistent approach to users and preamble about the survey. A one-page "frequently asked questions" (FAQ) brochure was available for interested participants; it described the study, the confidentiality of responses, and contacts for more information. The supplemental report on onsite methods provides the on -site survey instruments, survey protocols, and FAQ. On -site survey analysis used sampling and stratification variables (e.g., type of user, target species, guided /unguided, high use days vs. low use days) to conduct comparative analyses. In general, statistics for small sub groups were reported separately only when differences were statistically significant and substantively important (as discussed when results are presented). Follow -up surveys As with the 1992 study, the 2009 study included a follow -up survey that allowed more detailed questions. The follow -up survey was sent to a sample within each group of onsite respondents, a sample of landowners, and all guides (details below). All follow -up surveys included questions about user and trip characteristics, issue priorities, responses to crowding, past use and potential segment or activity displacement, support for general management strategies, support for specific management actions, "drift- only" issues, guided unguided use issues, and visual impacts from development. Most of these topics were addressed in the 1992 study, but many questions were modified or added after focus groups and agency input. The guide survey included additional questions about king salmon fishing trends and "drift only" issues; the landowner survey included additional questions about properties and trespass issues. a User follow -up survey PTA 1111 Respondents could take the survey on -line or by mail. On -line respondents were sent one email invitation and three reminders. Mail survey respondents were sent the survey and a cover letter, a post card reminder, and two additional reminders (the last containing a replacement copy of the survey in case they misplaced the first). In total, 1,650 on -site respondents provided email or mail addresses, 126 were illegible or duplicate addresses (because some people were surveyed more than once) and 221 were "bad addresses" (returned undeliverable by regular mail or bounced by email). This provided a total follow -up survey sample frame of 1,303 potential respondents; of these, 852 or 65% returned completed surveys. This was similar to the response rate for the 1992 study (68 Additional information about the sample is provided in the supplemental report on follow -up survey methods. A series of questions asked survey respondents to identify their l st and 2 °d most important recreation opportunities (and any others that they do). Results were used to group respondents into the four primary user groups (bank angler, drift boat angler, powerboat angler, or non angler; see details in supplemental report). Of the 852 follow -up survey respondents, 318 were bank anglers, 274 were driftboat anglers, 191 were powerboat anglers, and 69 were non-anglers. This method of categorizing users was different than for the 1992 study, which grouped users by the activity they were doing and the segment they were visiting on the day of the onsite survey. The 1992 method limited information about other segments and activities and may have "artificially" grouped users; the 2009 method allows users to self identify their most important activities and segrents. Guide survey State Parks had a list of 385 registered guides for 2009, which included outfitters, guides, and a few other commercial service providers (e.g., shuttle services, rental boats, etc.). All were sent an invitation to take the survey on -line or through the mail. In total, 43 addresses were undeliverable, so the final sample frame was 242. Completed surveys were received from 218 individuals, a response rate of 64%. This was slightly lower than the 1 response rate of 76 although that survey was only sent to a sample of guides, so the total samples size in 2009 was higher (218 vs. 143). The State Parks guide list was considered more comprehensive than the ADF &G Guide License Database (because it included other commercial enterprises operating in the river corridor); we did not cross reference the two databases. Using other information from the State Parks guide database, we were able to do a non response check. Our final sample was representative regarding the proportion of fishing guides, Alaskan residents, and independent guides (as opposed to those who work for an outfitter). Based on the same questions about 1s and 2 most important opportunities, the final sample included 157 powerboat guides, 48 driftboat guides, and 13 scenic raft guides or other commercial service providers. Details are provided in the supplemental report. Landowner survey Kenai Peninsula Borough (KPB) estimates there are approximately 3,500 properties along the Kenai River (most along the Middle and Lower Rivers). KPB provided a random sample of 200 landowners on the Lower and Middle River; all landowners with property adjacent to public easements; and all landowners on the Upper River (because there are only 82). uto e 20.10 From this initial sample of 682, 188 were removed because they were duplicates, corporations, or governmental agencies (we only wanted to send surveys to private individuals). We sent a postcard invitation to take the survey to the 494 remaining. Of these, 32 were "bad addresses," providing a final sample frame of 462. Completed surveys were received from 208 individuals (a response rate of 45 including 81 from the Lower River, 108 from the Middle River, and 19 from the Upper River. Thirty-five were landowners adjacent to easements. This was lower than the 1992 response rate of 74 although that survey was sent to a smaller sample of landowners (200), so the total samples size in 2009 was higher (208 vs. 147). Based on the same questions about "most important opportunities," the final sample included 74 bank anglers, 14 driftboat anglers, 99 powerboat anglers, and 21 non anglers. Details are provided in the supplemental report. Survey sample sizes Taken together, follow -up surveys were completed by 1,278 individuals, including 852 users, 218 guides, and 208 landowners. Table 2 -2 provides sample sizes by types of users. Table 2 -2. Sample sizes by types of users for the follow -up user, guide, and landowner surveys. Bank anglers 318 Driftboat anglers 274 Powerboat anglers 191 Non anglers 69 Total 852 Analysis Reporting Octhbe 20 Users Guides Landowners Total 0 74 397 48 14 335 157 99 443 13 21 103 218 208 1,278 This primary study report integrates information from components of the study; the supplemental report provides additional detailed information (e.g., results for different subgroups, the full range of questions in the survey, verbatim open -ended comments etc.). Analysis was based on recreation research protocols, including those used in the 1992 study and 2002 monitoring on the Kenai, and several other studies of Alaskan and Lower 48 rivers. Unless differences are small, analyses separate relevant sub groups. This strategy avoids characterizing an "average user who doesn't exist" (Schaefer, 1976), addresses concerns about unequal group sample sizes, and helps show how management actions might affect different groups. It also creates some artificial divisions between users that may encourage polarization (e.g., driftboaters vs. powerboaters, guided vs. unguided users). Additional information on specific analyses is provided as results are presented. Presentations of results and implications were made to 1) the KRSMA river use committee and 2) at a public meeting in February 2010, allowing feedback on concerns or additional analysis. A draft report (this document) will be presented to KRSMA advisory board for internal review in April 2010. The final report is expected in June 2010. Pace 12 Cautions and study context 0115 Study results apply to 2009 conditions and users. The study provides information from Kenai users in 2009 a "snapshot" of conditions and user attitudes from one year. For the onsite survey, information from previous years has been reviewed to help put study findings in context. For the follow -up survey, responses reflect evaluations of the river or management actions that are probably not dependent on year to -year variations. This issue is explored through comparisons to 1992 study findings. The study explores a full range of management actions, including controversial ones. To be comprehensive, the study included several actions that are unpopular with some groups or agencies. Effective management actions usually involve "costs" money, time, agency effort, or restrictions on how people use the river. The relevant adage here is, "if the choices were easy, they would have already been made." The study does not advocate specific action, but tries to clarify their trade -offs identifying what problems they may address (e.g., problems they may address, new problems they may create, which groups would benefit). Managing agencies (and specifically State Parks through its KRSMA advisory board process) will consider study information when making management decisions, but will also integrate other information (e.g., biophysical studies, use trends, stakeholder and public input) through a public process. Issues are likely to be "handled" through programmatic decisions or case -by -case amendments to the existing plan. The study develops some management options and recommends specific monitoring. Some study results (or information from other rivers) suggest potential solutions that deserve additional attention. These suggestions provide a "starting point" for additional discussion among agencies, stakeholders, and the public. The study also recommends future monitoring that may help agencies or the public become better "calibrated" to use and impact levels, also intended as a "starting point" for agency consideration. The study generally focuses on State Parks responsibilities, but some issues cross jurisdictional boundaries. The Kenai has a complex management environment, and decisions by one agency can affect use and impact patterns that create problems for others. It is beyond the scope of this report to sort through jurisdictional challenges, so we generally discuss management solutions without assessing specific agency responsibilities. We encourage multi agency decision- making in these situations, even as we recognize these have their own difficulties. As study results are presented, our goal is to anticipate new problems or identify connections to past management decisions. Surveys are not "votes" on study issues. There is a tendency to consider survey results as referenda on specific issues, but we caution against this. The purpose of this study is to provide information, identify group positions, and search for solutions that address problems (or share the burden of addressing them). In addition to studies, good planning integrates information from stakeholder input, public testimony at workshops and meetings, laws and legal mandates, and agency missions and regulations. The study assumes the overall goal of managing for a diversity of high quality recreation opportunities. The Kenai provides many recreation opportunities, including those with low, moderate, and high use levels. No particular opportunity is better or worse than others, but all opportunities cannot be provided on every mile of river. This means careful management is required to insure high quality. The study is designed to clarify differences among opportunities or management options; agencies make these judgments with public and stakeholder input through their planning processes. Kee% tor( tucl e4 M F VI c and- in plIf, ort..,. October 2010 Page 14 Factors influencing use levels Salmon runs and fishing success Early king (Chinook) run Late king (Chinook) run 3. Use Information Characterizing 2009 This chapter summarizes use and related information for 2009, and compares it to similar information from other years for context. A supplemental report provides supporting evidence and more detailed use or related information, for specific fisheries, seasons, and locations. Other sections of the report (specifically Chapter 5 on king salmon use trends, Chapter 16 on guide /unguided use issues, and Chapter 15 on use limits and capacities) also provide detailed use information or integrate it into discussion. This run arrives in early May and (by definition) the run ends July 1. It is historically much smaller than the late king run; the long term (1986 -2006) average in -river return is about 16,300 fish (with fishing mortality of about 6,000). In 2009, sonar estimates suggest about 11,000 early run kings entered the river, making this a lower than average return. The timing of the run was noririal, but started slowly; per day sonar counts did not exceed 100 fish until May 27. Counts exceeded 300 fish on only 15 days, with the sustained period of higher counts occurring from June 5 to June 14. Only three days exceeded 500 fish per day; the highest day was 603 on June 11. Fishing was generally "slow" through this run, with ADF &G creel information suggesting it took over 60 hours per unguided angler to catch a king in most weeks (the exception was the week of June 4, when the average was 37 hours). For guided anglers, it generally took about 40 hours per caught fish (with the best week at 23 hours per fish). This run is much larger than the early run. By definition, kings entering the river after July 1 are categorized as late run fish. Fishing for the late run closes July 31, but a few kings continued to arrive after that date. Sonar counts were discontinued on August 3. The long term (1986 -2007) in -river return is about 42,000 fish (with about 13,000 harvested or lost to catch release mortality). In 2009, sonar estimates suggest only 25,700 fish entered the river, making it the lowest run on record. The timing of the run was normal, but after an initial period of higher daily counts numbers dropped and did not rebound. Per day counts through the sonar exceeded 600 on most days through July 23, but averaged about 500 afterwards. Counts exceeded 1,000 fish on only 9 days, with the sustained period of higher counts occurring from July 11. to 22. The highest count was 1,249 on July 17. In an average year, counts will exceed 1,000 fish on over 20 days, and it is common for nearly half of those to exceed 1,500. In "good years," counts from 2,000 to 3,000 may occur on a handful of days. Fishing success was better than the early run as anglers were allowed to use bait, and success rates approached long term averages early in the month. It took unguided anglers about 8 to 21 hours to catch a king during this run, with the rate degrading through July (particularly in the last week of July). For guided anglers it took between 10 and 14 hours, with success rates following the same timing pattern. Cklobcr 2010 Page 15 ee� �Jt4 Early red (Sockeye) run The first red run to enter the Kenai River are bound primarily for the Russian River and is smaller than the late run. 2009 had 52,178 fish through the Russian River weir, coincidentally similar to the long term average of 52,000 fish. By regulation, the fishery in the Russian and Upper Kenai rivers for sockeye salmon opens June 11. The run was strong enough to allow ADF &G to increase the area open to fishing by allowing anglers to fish in the Russian River Sanctuary effective June 15. The fishery was further liberalized by increasing the bag possession limit from 3 daily 3 in possession to 6 daily 12 in possession on June 17. ADF &G assesses creel for this fishery through its statewide harvest surveys, which estimated a harvest of approximately 59,000 reds. Success rates were good to excellent throughout this run, particularly on the Upper River (where most use is concentrated). However, several long tenn users remarked that fishing success was also unusually good (and use levels were higher) for the early run at some Lower and Middle River locations (especially during the first week of the run). Late red (Sockeye) run The second red run to enter the Kenai River is substantially larger than the first, with fish bound for many areas including the Russian River. The long term average is about 900,000 fish through the sockeye sonar counter at RM 19 near Sterling Highway Bridge in Soldotna; the 2009 count was about 745,000 or 83% of the average. This run arrived in two distinct surges, with peak counts from July 14 to 21 (averaging about 39,000 fish per day) and a shorter, smaller peak from July 27 to 31 (averaging about 32,000 per day). Per day averages did not exceed 8,000 fish until July 11, were about 13,000 fish per day between the peaks, and averaged less than 10,000 per day after the second peak. ADF &G statewide harvest survey results indicate anglers harvested about 240,000 reds above the sonar counter, slightly lower than the long term average (see below). Several sources suggest that success rates were fair to good in the early part of the run on the Lower and Middle River, but declined substantially after water levels rose about July 23 and then again in early August. On the Upper River, there were short periods of "excellent" red fishing from July 13 -15 (before the flooding) and from August 2 -15 (after flooding had subsided; it was not affected by the second flood). ADF &G statewide harvest surveys indicate the catch averages about 315,000 sockeye each year (1997- 2006), although this fluctuates from 217,000 (1998) to 389,000 (2005). Segment data suggest about 37% are caught in the Lower River; 36% downstream of Moose River on the Middle River; 13% upstream of Moose River on the Middle River; and 13% from the Upper River (the remainder come from unspecified locations). Silver (Coho) runs ADF &G does not monitor in- season run strength of the Kenai silver return via sonar. Some sources suggested that 2009 silver success rates were "typical" although others suggest they were "better than average," particularly on the Lower River. Silver success rates appeared to slow from August 14 to 20 during a second round of flooding on the Lower and Middle River. Success rates for silvers on the Upper River (Heim, 2009) suggest the best fishing was from Aug 20 to Sept 3, but it never reached "good," "excellent," or "superb" levels. ADF &G statewide harvest surveys indicate Kenai silver harvest levels have recently averaged about 43,000 fish per year (1997 2006), with about 59% caught in the Lower River, 21% in the Middle River, Oct o a Trout and Dolly Varden fisheries and 11% in the Upper River, and the remainder in lakes or unspecified locations. About 70% (approximately 30,000 silvers) are harvested prior to September. ADF &G assessments of trout and Dolly fisheries for 2009 indicate catch of these two species was similar to previous years and over the past decade catch has trended upwards. Several other sources suggest that 2009 success rates were "typical" of recent years (and generally considered "excellent The highest use targeting these species is on the Upper and Middle Rivers. Fishing success ratings from the Upper River (Heim, 2009) suggest trout fishing was best from August 1 through September 6, and from September 14- 20. From ADF &G statewide harvest surveys, about 113,000 Kenai rainbow are caught each year (1997- 2006). Only about 2.5% of rainbow are retained; a shift to a catch and release fishery (in the mid- 1980s, 22 to 27% retained fish). About 11% are caught in the Lower River; 9% downstream of Moose River on the Middle River; 24% upstream of Moose River on the Middle River; 55% from the Upper River; and the remainder in unspecified Locations. From ADF &G statewide harvest surveys, about 98,000 Dolly Varden are caught in the Kenai each year (1997- 2006). About 6% are retained; a continuing shift toward a catch and release fishery (in the early 1990s, 15 to 34% retained fish). About 15% are caught in the Lower River; 9% downstream of Moose River on the Middle River; 22% upstream of Moose River on the Middle River; and 53% from the Upper River; and the remainder in unspecified locations. This -is similar to the rainbow distribution. Weather Based on a review of Soldotna and Cooper Landing mid -day temperatures and total precipitation, weather during 2009 was generally warmer and sunnier than average (particularly from May through mid August, and in late August through early September). In Southcentral Alaska as a region, 2009 had the 3" lowest amount of cloud cover over the past 13 years (Papineau, 2010). However, there was a substantial rainstorm in the Kenai Mountains in late July led to flooding that affected fishing success and access (and diminished use). A glacier dam outburst above Skilak Lake also created flooding on the Lower and Middle Rivers in mid August. Flows and flooding Substantially higher than normal flows occurred during two distinct floods, from July 23 to August. 8 (the "first flood and August 13 to 21 (the "second flood A third flood occurred in October 2009, but outside the study period. Figure 3 -1 graphs flow levels (and shows days with substantial rain). The first flood was caused by rain in the Kenai Mountains and affected the entire river, but with greater flooding on the Middle and Lower Rivers. Starting from typical mid summer peak flows about 7,000 cfs at Cooper Landing and 14,000 cfs at Soldotna, the peak at Cooper Landing was 10,500 cfs on July 31; flows dropped below 8,000 cfs by August 4. At Soldotna, flows peaked at 24,000 cfs on August 1, and dropped below 18,000 cfs by August 8. The second flood resulted from a glacial lake outburst in the mountains above Skilak Lake, causing flooding only from the lake downstream a week after the first flood. At Soldotna, flows increased from 17,000 cfs to a peak of 26,000 cfs on August 17. The river returned to typical sunnner high flows (below 18,000 cfs) by August 21. Both floods inundated recreation facilities (docks, launches, and angler boardwalks /platforms) or made bank fishing in many areas challenging. Flow (cfs) 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Flood stage 12.0 feet or about 26,500 cfs Economic downturn Action stage 11.5 feet or about 23,500 cfs Rainfall event into Silak Lake Other potential factors f 1 I 1 LI I 1i Mean monthly flow curve Soldotna f 3 2OrJ9 as €'s: flows )per L an iinq Mean monthly flow cur e Cooper Landing !lull1 pus anc Days with rain (bars at bottom) 2009 daily flows Soldotna T facial dam outburst 111111'111, o ti g o\ co s(t \ti w o s� 1, 11. N t. titb 4 a a� v5, e °c P c 5 5e Figure 3 -1. 2009 flow levels at Cooper Landing and Soldotna USGS gages. There was a major economic recession in the United States in 2009, which may have affected local and national visitation to the river. Alaska summer tourism visitation was down an estimated 7% (passenger arrivals) and the number of post- cruise land -based users (estimated to comprise two- thirds of Southcentral Alaska tourism arrivals) was down about 13% (McDowell Group as reported by Bradner, 2009). On the follow -up survey for this study, guides were asked to estimate whether the number of client -days on the river were "substantially lower" -5 to -30 "lower" (0 to -5 "about the same," "higher" (0 to +5 or substantially higher +5 to +30%) than previous years. For all guides taken together, 20% reported "substantially lower," 34% reported "slightly lower," and only 6% "higher" or "substantially higher" (see supplemental report for more details). King salmon fisheries in the Susitna basin were closed due to poor returns early in 2009, which may have affected Kenai River fishing levels. When Kenai red salmon fishing opened on June 11, no other substantial Soutbcentral salmon fishery had opened previously. When this first red run appeared strong (and especially after limits were increased to 6 fish per day one week into the season), high latent demand led to high use levels. In contrast, when rod and reel fishing for the second Kenai red run peaked in mid -July, the July 10 -31 Kenai personal use fishery targeting reds at the mouth had been open for a week and was on track to Ockther 2010 Use level estimates afo having the highest use on record (despite flooding at the end of the month that made dipping challenging). Overall, the personal use fishery at the mouth appears to have substantially reduced fishing pressure among rod and reel anglers on the rest of the river over the past decade. The personal use fishery did not exist during the 1992 study, and the number of personal use "days fished" (people fishing x number of days) has more than doubled from 10,500 in its first year (1996) to just over 26,000 in 2009 (ADF &G, 2009). By definition, recreation use studies pay attention to use information. A half century of visitor impact research shows that other factors besides use levels affect impacts, but use levels "drive" many impacts and are an integral part of recreation management. Accordingly, we have tried to profile use levels on the Kenai for various segments and seasons below. Most recreation use information is reported for large areas (e.g., for an entire river) or for long periods of time (e.g., for a month, season, or entire year). This is important for some management issues (e.g., total harvest estimates, economic impact analyses), but is less useful for assessing impacts at specific times or locations. It is important to include more specific use measures, each of which specify units (e.g., user days, people, boats, or trips), timing (e.g., at one time, per day, per week, per month, per season), and location (e.g., at a launch area, in the entire segment, at specific attraction sites). For the Kenai, "at one time or daily estimates for specific segments and sites are probably the most relevant for this report, although some annual or run specific information is also provided. With all use information, the goal is to understand overall use patterns. However, visitor impact management tends to focus on peak levels, which is when impacts are more likely to reach "unacceptable" levels and require management attention. Use information comes from several sources (as noted when results are presented). Most use information is based on counts of boats, cars, or anglers at public facilities. There may be considerable bank use from private property that was not assessed in this study. Effort and harvest on the entire river ADF &G statewide harvest surveys estimate about 315,000 angler -days of effort on the Kenai River each year from 1997 -2006. This is an increase over 1977 -1995 average of 278,000 angler -days. 2009 estimates will not be available until fall 2010. Segment distributions of angler effort (1997 -2006) suggest about 47% occurs in the Lower River; 26% in the Middle River (below Moose River); 12% in the Middle River (above Moose River); and 13% in the Upper River (with the rest unspecified by location). Species harvest on the Kenai (1997 -2006) suggests anglers keep about 16,000 kings; 225,000 reds; 43,000 silvers; 10,000 pinks (with large disparities in odd and even years); 3,000 rainbow; and 6,000 Dolly Varden per year. With rainbow and Dallies, many more fish are caught and released. Octob ag; 19 Lower River Bank angling til Bank angling on the Lower River during 2009 was highest during the second red run, but was also substantial during kings, silvers, and the first red run. Entire segment counts were not conducted, but site counts indicate use levels and patterns: Cunningham Park had rare bank angler use during red or king runs, but it had consistent use during silver season. Maximum 2009 bank angler counts were 22 at one time (Aug 21). With 230 feet of shore, this creates spacing of about 9 feet between anglers (assuming anglers are evenly spaced and an average width of 2 feet per angler). The beach across from Beaver Creek is a popular bank angling site (accessed from boats) during the second red run. An average of 14 anglers was observed at this site during second red run, with a high of 45. This beach also had similar high use levels (41) during silvers over Labor Day weekend. With a length of about 800 feet, spacing between anglers at these peak levels is about 16 feet. Eagle Rock has almost no bank anglers until silver season; then it averages about 4 at one time. River Bend campground has substantial bank angling use during the second red run, with up to 20 anglers at one time. RiverQuest properties offer some bank angling during the second red run, with up to 15 anglers at one time during peaks in 2009. Ciechanski SRS (immediately adjacent to RiverQuest) usually attracts only 2 to 3 bank anglers at one time during the second red run, but 15 were observed on one day. Big Eddy SRS typically had 5 to 10 anglers at one time during the second red run, but the island beach (directly across the river; accessible by boat) had as many as 41. That beach is about 680 feet long, so evenly distributed anglers at this peak equates with about 15 feet between anglers. Poacher's Cove may have 1 to 3 anglers in king or red seasons, but 14 to 16 were observed. at Pipeline SRS (across the river) during the second red run. Centennial Park is a primary bank angling area during kings, reds, and silvers. King and silver fishing is concentrated near the boat Iaunch parking lot; red fishing occurs along the entire property (usually clustered at stairwells down the bank). Average numbers at one time were 4 (with peaks about 10) during kings; 30 (with the peak of 47) during reds; and 21 (with a peak of 29) during silvers. The shore from boat harbor to trees is about 800 feet long; it provided spacing of about 15 feet during red peaks and 26 feet during silvers. Bank anglers visible from the Visitor Center boardwalks (including those under the bridge or fishing from private land across the river) averaged about 17 during the second red run (with a peak at 37). Boat based angling Boat -based angling is highest on the Lower River during the second run of kings (July), but is also substantial during silver season. Some boats also access bank angling areas for reds during July. Accurate counts of boats during king runs are provided by ADF &G (four counts daily on a sample of days during first and second king runs) and overflight information (from the Kenai Watershed Forum turbidity hydrocarbon monitoring on three days in July). Vehicle counts at major launches through the entire season provided estimates of silver season use levels, recognizing that many boats may originate from private land docks rather than public launches. Figure 3 -2 shows ADF &G boat counts for the 2009 king seasons. The figure reports the highest count for a given day (out of four counts daily; time of counts is randomized; the peak count is typically the first count that occurs after 6 am, when guides are allowed on the river). The figure also distinguishes October 200 between boats that are engaged in fishing vs. "active" boats (not fishing at the time of the count); and between "drift only Mondays" and all other days (fishing from a powerboat is prohibited on Mondays). Chinook sonar counts are also shown to help illustrate relative fishing success. 500 400 300 200 100 o 010 Number of boats Dark shaded bars are "drift only Mondays" Number fishing "active" Number fishing a 41 V)" o 1 &00 High water- 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Figure 3.1. Highest daily boat counts (fishing active) during king season on the Lower River, 2009. Results suggest several findings about 2009 Lower River boating use during king season: Boat counts increased through the season, peaking toward the end of July. If flooding had not occurred in the last week of July, counts would probably have gone higher. Boat counts on powerboat days during the first run (before July 1) rarely exceeded 100 boats at one time, but ranged around 150 to 350 in July (when bait is allowed and fishing success was considerably higher). Boat counts tend to be highest on Saturdays (the weekend day when guides are allowed) and Tuesdays (after a day of lower fishing pressure due to "drift- only" fishing regulations). Boat counts from 2005 -2008 show common peaks on Tuesdays and Saturdays in late July were about 450 boats at one time, so 2009 peaks between 300 and 350 were lower by 20 to 30 Assuming relatively even distributions throughout the Lower River (not including downstream of Warren Ames Bridge), 350 boats at one time would average about 21 boats per mile. If boat peaks ever reached 500 boats at one time, an even distribution would produce averages of about 29 boats per mile. As discussed below and in Chapter 6, king anglers do not evenly distribute themselves throughout Lower River, so densities of boats are likely to be much higher in some areas (e.g., Sunken Island to Big Eddy, Eagle Rock to the Chinook sonar station). Sundays had lower boat counts than Saturdays; guides are not allowed to fish commercially on Sundays. The proportion of active boats averaged about 17% and was higher in late July (26 Boat counts on "drift -only" days (which rarely exceeded 100 boats) were considerably lower than powerboat days. On powerboat days, drift boats account for less than 2% of boat counts. Boat counts on drift -only Mondays increased through July until the last week, which was affected by flooding. Page 21 Boat count data suggests that the proportion of guided boats during "guide hours" (Tuesday through Saturday, 6 to 6) averaged about 65 with slightly higher proportions in the first I1111 (67 than the second (59 The maximum number of guide boats on any given day in 2009 was about 210, but in other years may have reached 250 or 300. According. to 2009 ADF &G guide logbook data (Sigurdsson Powers, 201 as many as 255 guides reported using the segment at some point in the year. Because the maximum number of guided boats is probably more static than the total number of boats, the proportion of guided boats is sometimes Iower on the highest use days. (See further discussion in Chapter 15 on guided /unguided use issues). Guide logbook information Sigurdsson Powers, 2010) provides additional evidence of use patterns. It suggests there were 21,156 guided angler days on the Lower River. This is substantially higher than the 5,300 guided angler -days on the Lower River and 6,900 guided angler days on the Upper River. About 80% of the guided angler -days were used by non residents. Vehicle counts at the Pillars also show 2009•was a low use year. In recent years, the lot was closed (because it filled) nearly every morning the last three weeks in July; in 2009, this only happened on 3 days. Pillars boat trailer counts during first run king season averaged 19 and never exceeded 34; during July they averaged 42 and never exceeded 62. The capacity of the parking lot is about 80 spaces; the number occupied by trailers vs. vehicles varies). Pillars trailer counts during silver season averaged 14, rarely exceeded 20, but had one unusually high day in mid August (40). Based on this information (assuming Pillars trailers to ADF&G count ratios are similar in king and silver seasons), total boat counts during silver season in 2009 probably averaged between 80 to 100 boats at one time and rarely exceeded 150. Assuming relatively even distributions, this would produce boat density averages of 4 to 6 per mile (with a maximum of about 9 per mile) during silver season. A "typical" silver season average of 5 per mile is about one quarter of the density on the highest use days during the 2009 king season (about 21 per mile); the silver season density peak of 9 per mile is about half of the king season peak (21). Again, we stress that these average densities assume even distributions of boats, which is a substantial oversimplification. Time of day patterns during high use king salmon runs can best be illustrated by the number of boats passing Eagle Rock per hour (counts conducted by the Kenai Watershed. Forum). Figure 3 -3 shows a distinct peak in early morning followed by a declining limb through the rest of the day when guided powerboats are allowed (Sat. and Tues.). In contrast, the Sunday pattern shows no early morning peak and lower use levels overall, with "drift -only" Mondays having even lower use still. October 2010 300 250 200 150 100 50 Boats passing per hour 2005 boat wake study Range from 7amto7om Tue -Fri in mid -July 0 �w3J 6 am guide openin No guides" "Drift-only" Sunday Sunday Monday Total :boats. G11 IL.cw "Super Tuesday 1,9 1". 6 44 40 ti ti h 15' ti 4'3* ,�o 4`. ryti ti o ^i« h.93. titi ry Fri Jul 17 Sat Jul 16 Sun Jul 18 Mon Jul 20 Tue Jul 21 River gn Figure 3 -3. Overflight boat counts in mid -July showing example daily use patterns. 400 µti0: 200 00 Explanations for these use patterns include: A large proportion of the "fishing fleet" (over half on Tuesdays through Fridays, and only slightly lower on Saturdays) is guided, which have a starting time defined by regulation (6 am). This dictates the timing of the main peak. Regulations require anglers who catch and keep a king to stop fishing from a boat for the day, so some boats leave the river as anglers catch and keep king salmon. Unguided users who want to fish prior to the guide opening have a window between "first light" (about 3 to 4 am in July) and the 6 am guide opening, but many take -out after guides appear or after completing an average trip length (about 6 hours). Fishing success may decline through the day. However, guides that offer two trips per day sometimes create a mid -day "bump," and some unguided users may wait until after guide hours (6 pm) to start an "evening session." Sundays do not show an early morning peak, and have less use overall. This is probably due to the lack of guide boats. Drift -boat Mondays show considerably lower use and no obvious peak. KWF overflight and ADF &G counts on these same days suggest that the early peak is less pronounced on some segments than others, with the early peak most likely to occur lower in the river (below Beaver Creek), which would be reflected in the Eagle Rock boats passing data (since most launches are upstream). This may have reflected tide timing on those days. Questions on the guide survey address some of these issues; see Chapter 5 on king salmon fishing use and trends. Sub segment use patterns are also evident in the KWF data and ADF &G boat counts. In general, the highest densities (boats per mile) on high use days in 2009 were between the Sonar (RM 8.5) and Pillars (RM 12.3) and may exceed 25 boats per mile, but similarly densities are possible below the Sonar (when Octt l 2010 fag tides are conducive to fishing) or upstream of the Pillars (particularly from the Poacher's Cove to Honeymoon Cove). Additional discussion of boat distributions and their implications for management are provided in Chapter 5 on king salmon use and trends. Middle River Bank angling Bank angling on the Middle River in 2009 was highest during the second red run, but also occurred during the first red and silver runs. Segment counts were not conducted for bank anglers, but site counts indicate use levels and patterns. The highest levels at Swiftwater Park occurred during the second red run (average 17; peak 35). During the first red and silver runs, the average was 6 with peaks of 19 and 15, respectively. A bank angling area on Agrium property and the adjacent USFWS access site averaged 11 anglers at one time during the second red run. Funny River Road anglers (including Kenai River Center, Rotary Park, and Funny River SRS) averaged 41 anglers through the second red run, with a peak of 85. Counts at Kenai River Center averaged 9 anglers (with a peak of 14) during the second red run; Rotary Park had 18 anglers during the tail end of the second red run, but none after flooding began. These areas were surveyed only during the second red run. Morgan's Landing averaged 16 anglers (peak of 25) during the second red run, but never exceeded 6 at other tunes. Izaak Walton averaged 14 anglers (peak of 17) during the second red run, but never exceeded 7 at other times. Sampling at Bing's focused on the launch area, which often had no bank anglers (and averaged under 2), although sampling included some visits to the "rapids hole" on a public easement near the Landing. A peak count at the "rapids hole" near Bing's Landing (public easement) had 25 anglers during the first red run; there were not sufficient counts at the "rapids hole" to estimate averages. Boat -based angling Boat -based angling is highest on the Middle River during July and August, as anglers target kings, second run reds, early run silvers, and trout/Dollies. Unlike the Lower River, there is no systematic boat counting program, although State Parks rangers and overflight information (from the Kenai Watershed Forum monitoring) provide "spot boat counts" for certain segments. Vehicle counts at major launches, fieldwork vehicle counts, and shuttle company statistics also help indicate use levels and patterns. On three days in mid -July (Sat 18, Sun 19, and Tue 21), KWF overflights (5 per day) counted an average of 56 boats on the Middle River, with 28 (50 upstream from Kenai Keys. The peak boat count for the entire segment was 70 (at two different times on Saturday). The peak count above the Kenai Keys was 43. These counts produce an average of 1.9 boats per mile of the entire Middle River (29 miles), but use is not distributed evenly. There were about 1.0 boats per mile from Soldotna Bridge to Moose River; 1.4 boats per mile from Moose River to Kenai Keys; and 5.1 boats per mile from Kenai Keys to Skilak Lake outlet. Even the highest at- one -time boat counts on the highest use sub segment (Kenai Keys to Skilak) were only 7.8 boats per mile, far less than the 20 to 30 boats per mile that can occur on parts of the Lower River on peak days. Boat counts from other days suggest boat levels may range higher than the KWF counts. On six days from avid -July through mid September, rangers counted an average of 72 boats from Moose River to 2010 Skilak (5.3 boats per mile). Peaks from these counts were 98 on Saturday, July 25 and 91 on Labor Day Saturday (September 5). These peak densities were about 7 boats per mile over the longer Moose River to Skilak distance. It is likely that densities sometimes exceed 10 boats per mile on the higher use Kenai Keys to Skilak sub- segment; this is supported by counts in "Rainbow Alley" (a roughly one mile reach near the lake outlet) on Sunday September 6 (Labor Day weekend), when the average was 9, with a range from 3 to 13. Ranger counts in 2009 showed about 31% of boats in the Middle River were guided, with an average count of 23 and a high of 34. In July, guided boat counts never exceeded 10 (many guide boats were in the Lower River); in September, they averaged 29. 2004 USFWS interview data from Bing's Landing and Lower Skilak show guided use makes up about 25% of all boats in July and this use is focused on the early part of the day (6 am to 2 pin); in October, guided use is about 22% of all use and is evenly distributed across the whole day. In both periods, powerboats made up about 80% of all use. Bing's Landing trailer counts suggest that use from June through mid August (average of 16 per count) is generally lower than from mid- August through mid September (average of 26). The average over the whole season was 21. The highest trailer count was 55 on September 12. Lower Skilak boat trailer counts on nine days during surveying averaged 12, with a peak of 22 in late August. Discussions with a Middle River shuttle service (Finch, 2009) suggest that higher trailer counts probably occurred on many days from mid -July through mid- September. The "first parking lot" near the launch is typically at capacity with 12 to 15 trailers, and shuttle drivers frequently reported having to retrieve vehicles from Parking Lot B (an additional capacity of 10 to 15 trailers) and sometimes Parking Lot C (additional capacity of 20 to 30 trailers; although this was rarely full). They rarely saw trailers in Parking Lot D. USFWS conducted boat counts and exit interviews in July and Oct 2004; these may help suggest use patterns in 2009, although we only have anecdotal evidence that use in these years was similar. Trailer counts in late July 2004 averaged 13, with a peak of 35 on the Middle River. USFWS counts also varied through the day, with peaks in mid- afternoon. These data also showed that some boats may be on the river (or lake) overnight (between 3 and 19, with an average of 9). Caribou Island or other Skilak property owners are encouraged to use Lower Skilak with its larger parking areas because there is a 72 hour parking limit at Upper Skilak launch and campground. 2004 USFWS monitoring suggested a boat ratio of 60:40 for Bing "s Landing vs. Lower Skilak on the Middle River, but 2009 counts suggest even higher use from Bing's. Neither 2004 or 2009 data account for use from private property on the Middle River; there are dozens of boats docked at private cabins on the reach. Shuttle counts from the Middle River (Finch, 2009) offer additional evidence of seasonal and segment use patterns. The company averaged 3.1 shuttles per day over the entire season (from May through September), but averaged less than 1 per day in May and June, just over 3 in July and just over 5 in September. The most popular shuttle was from Skilak to Bings (76 but 13% had trailers shuttled from Skilak to Izaak Walton (13 and Skilak to Centennial Swiftwater (9 Nearly all shuttles were driftboats. Guide logbook information (Sigurdsson Powers, 2010) provides additional evidence of use patterns. It suggests there were 5,322 guided angler days on the Middle River, with 64% of those days upstream of the Moose River confluence. About 64% of the angler -days were non residents. The total number of Middle River guided angler -days is substantially lower than the 21,000 guided angler -days on the Lower River and slightly lower than the 6,900 guided angler days on the Upper River. Time of day use patterns during mid -July are distinctly different from those on the Lower River, as illustrated in by KWF overflight counts. Figure 3 -4 shows that use builds quickly and is sustained October 2010 100 80 60 40 20 0 en cr `r cs J!r through the day. Although guide hours are in effect, more varied target species and lower use levels may help distribute use more evenly over time. Number of powerboats (from overflights) Total: Middle River (Soldotna Bridge to Skilak Lake) I Oose Rivet td Kenai Keys Soldotna Bridge to Moo'e River O 0 Sat Jul 18 O 0 0 Sun Jul 19 0 0 Tue Jul 21 Figure 3.4. Overflight boat counts in mid -July showing patterns on high use days. Upper River Bank angling Bank angling on the Upper River during 2009 was highest during the first red run, but also substantial during the second red run. There is relatively little bank angler use associated with silvers or trout /Dollies (except by bank anglers using boats for access). Segment counts were not conducted for bank anglers, but several sources indicate bank angling use levels. (Note that the study did not focus on Russian River anglers). Russian River ferry daily use probably provides the best indicator of Upper River bank angling use patterns, as shown in Figure 3 -5. Ferry passenger use shows first red run use was higher than second run and silver season use, with peaks topping 1,300 anglers per day. The peak in the second run only reached about 450 per day. The graph also shows sharp drops during high water in late July. A review of ferry passenger use from 2005-2010 suggests that 2009 was similar to recent years. 2005, 2006, and 2007 all had peaks that were slightly higher than 2009 in the early run, but 2008 and 2010 had lower peaks. All six years had similar peaks in the second run, but most other years had sustained "moderate use" between 300 and 400 passengers per day for a longer period than in 2009. Of the six years, only 2010 had lower use throughout the year, which may reflect lower than average red returns and generally colder and rainier weather. A graph in the supplemental report shows passenger data for all six years. Rabe 2010 ge 26 1,50 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 Ooher2010 Daily ferry passenger totals are not always highly correlated with "at one tinge" use on either side of the ferry. The number of ferry tickets is also partially driven by the time it takes anglers to catch their limit; when the fishing is "hot," ferry turnover may be higher. Kenai Russian River Users Ferry tickets sold 0 I l Angler counts Confluence to "Big Tree" High water period Traditional late red run peak on Upper River Angler counts Confluence to Big Tree \t ti R, ry s.,93 >y ,y`Y ep co 0 10 ,11 ^2 N 0 <1 (b 6 OA 4 0 40 0( I P ao P PO4 04 C'0 4 4 e Figure 3-5. Indicators of bank angling use levels on the Upper River, 2009. 250 300 200 150 100 50 Forest Service "on site" angler counts on the Russian River side of the Kenai helped assess "at one time" use on this shore through the year. One "count zone" was between the Russian River confluence and a distinctive tree about 700 feet downstream traditionally the highest density bank angling location on the river when it is open (this is part of the "sanctuary Although highly 1 ted with daily (r in counts t this site were som correlated uar�y ferry passenger use �i �.72 variation 1 c .1 s a s �J surprising. For example, mid afternoon counts on a Friday (150) were three times larger than a mid- afternoon count on the following Sunday (45). Nonetheless, counts showed a similar pattern to Ferry use: during the first red run, counts in this area were generally higher, averaging 98 anglers and peaking at 150. During the second run, the average was 45, with a peak of 112. In between runs, the average was 39 and the peak 47. At counts over 100 for this area, after considering the width of angler's themselves, spacing between anglers is about five feet. At counts of 150, distance between anglers is probably just over two feet, and probably feels like "shoulder to shoulder." At counts around 50, spacing between anglers approaches about 12 feet. Other counts on the Russian River side suggest there are lower densities as one moves downstream toward the Ferry and then past the powerline. Correlations between counts above and below the ferry were moderate (r 0.43), suggesting distributions along this shore may not be even. Counts of bank anglers on the island across from the Russian Confluence were also much lower and even less correlated with "confluence to tree" counts (r 0.50). Forest Service day use parking at the Russian River (number of people and vehicles) was highly correlated with daily ferry passenger use (r 0.92), showing a similar high use pattern for the first run. However, onsite survey sampling suggested that relatively few Russian River day users actually fished the Kenai (most fished the Russian). Boat -based angling Boat -based angling (which includes anglers fishing from the shore accessed by boat) is highest on the Upper River during the two red runs, but can also be high during trout /Dolly and silver seasons in Late August and September. Like the Middle River, there is no systematic boat counting program, although USFWS fee information from Sportsman's Landing indicates boating use over the years, and 2009 data from parking lot counts at major launches, fieldwork counts, and shuttle company statistics can be examined in comparison to 2004 data from a more detailed USFWS monitoring effort that counted boats via motion detecting video (USFWS, 2004). Note: This comparison assumes that the amount of use, the proportions of guided/unguided boats, and types of boats were similar in 2004 and 2009; as discussed below, 2009 use levels generally appear to be slightly higher overall than in 2004 (especially in the early red run). USFWS concessionaires tracked daily Sportsman's launches in 2009; it is likely to be a good overall indicator of boating use (and may reflect both fishing -based and scenic boating use). In addition, it has been collected in previous years and can provide some overall context for longer -term use trends. As shown in Figure 3 -6, use was higher during the first red run, with an average of 52 boats launched per day and a peak of 107. In the second red run, the average was 24 with a peak of 55. After mid August during the trout /Dolly /silver season, the average was 27 with a peak of 48. USFWS data also show a distinct weekend peaking pattern (with higher use on Saturday than Sundays). With the exception of the first red run, weekend peaks tended to range between 30 and 50 launches per day while weekdays were usually under 20. 100 80 60 40 20 e A review of Sportsman's Landing boating launches from 2005 -2010 suggests that 2009 was similar to recent years. Although 2009 had the highest single day total of any year during the early run (10'7 boats), several other years had peaks over 80. During the second run, all six years had some peaks exceeding 50 boats per day, but 2009 had some noticeable lower peaks during the second run for the r Fiber2Ga0 Launches from Sportsman's Fishing opens Traditional late red run peak on Upper River 0 1 1 1 1I I _Ei� :•i ii ,�iii�i <7,111< <<11 iiiii 3 <Ui� 3;�< u =ii F��i:,ii��i�Eii� i iii a� ^I% Ng ry h o a ry o g y ry o '3 p 0) NO a ry o 4 R eQ m e� o a` a P P 1 5 Figure 3.6. Sportsman's Access Area launches on the tipper River, 2009. 1.5 weeks when water levels were high. There is no clear trend toward increasing use in these six years, although there are indicators that use is increasing on Saturdays during the trout and silver season toward the end of August and start of September, with 2007, 2008, and 2009 showing peaks similar to or higher than those during the second red run. Anecdotal reports suggest this trend is continuing into mid- August, but Sportsman launch data does not continue past the first week in September so this can't be confirmed. USFWS conducted interviews at Jim's Landing in 2004 to assess proportions of trips from different launches. Data suggest about 55% of trips launch from Sportsman's, 33% from Cooper Landing, 10% from private land (mostly outfitters) in Cooper Landing, and. 2% from Jim's Landing to run the Canyon. A small percentage of trips may also put in at Cooper Landing and take -out at Sportsman's. Applying these percentages to 2009 Sportsman's data suggests that as many as 200 boats may have been 011 the river on the highest use Saturday during the first red run, but more typical first run averages (and weekend peaks during the second run and trout/silver season) were about 100 boats per day. On weekdays outside the first red run, typical daily totals are probably less than 50. These are similar use levels to those reported from USFWS photo counts just below the ferry in 2004 (which was comprehensive when the video cameras were working, but undercounts total use because it does not include boats that took out at Sportsman's or put in at Jim's). In 2004, the first red run average was 91, with a peak at 188 (compared to 2009 estimates of 100 and 200). In the second red run in 2004, the average was 78 and the peak was 144; after the red runs, the average was 71 with a peak of 123. 2009 estimates suggest slightly higher estimates on weekends, but Iower estimates on weekdays. Trailer counts at Jim's Landing are another indicator of use and show a similar pattern. The first run average (44 with a peak of 65) was higher than the second (26 with a peak of 49) or the trout /silver season (average of 30 with a peak of 61). USFWS 2004 video monitoring suggests that 34% of boats were rafts, 33% were driftboats, 21% were larger catarafts, 8% were small "fish cats," and 2% were canoes or kayaks. 2009 survey data show similar craft proportions (see user profile information). USFWS 2004 data suggest about 31% of all boats were guided (16% on angling trips and 15% on scenic trips). About 55% were unguided trips (about 44% angling and 6% scenic). The remaining 15% were unable to be classified as guided /unguided or angling /scenic. Based on 2004 USFWS video and Jim's Landing exit interviews, sampling at Jim's Landing between noon and 7 pm (similar to hours used in the 2009 study) covers about 72% of all boat trips. That data also suggests that take -outs are not evenly distributed, with highest take -out use between 3 and 7 pm (about 25% of daily launches take out in any given 2 hour period between those hours). About 15% of total daily use takes out between 1 and 3 pm. Shuttle counts from the Upper River (Wildman 2009) suggest that use in August and September may be higher than June and July (aside from the peak during the early red run). The company never exceeded 5 shuttles per day through July, but commonly exceeded 20 on weekends through September (with a peak of 30 on September 19). This service appears most popular among trout focused driftboat users, but provides general support for the notion that trout season use is increasing. Wildman's reports that shuttles have been increasing in recent years, but it is not known whether this is due to more boaters or more people using shuttles. Guide logbook information (Sigurdsson Powers, 2010) provides additional evidence of use patterns. It suggests there were 6,862 guided angler days on the Upper River, with 83% of those by non- residents. This is substantially lower than the 21,000 guided angler -days on the Lower River and slightly higher than the 5,300 guided angler days on the Middle River. October 2010 Page 29 Octobe 4. A Profile of Kenai River Users, Landowners, and Guides This chapter summarizes important characteristics about users, guides, and landowners, and their trips on the river. It organizes information by the major "groups" used for analysis in the rest of the report. The supplemental report includes additional data from on -site and follow -up user, guide, and landowner surveys, Categorizing respondents For the on -site survey, users were categorized by the activity they were doing on the day they were surveyed (which dictated the survey form they received). The four types included: Bank anglers, including all anglers who did not use a boat during their trip; Powerboat anglers, including anglers who use a powerboat to access bank fishing areas; Driftboat anglers, including anglers who fish from rafts, catarafts, and drift boats or use boats to access shore areas, even if they used kicker motors for parts of their trip; and Non- anglers, including campers, hikers, wildlife viewers, and scenic rafters. Responses to other questions were also used to categorize respondents, including: Segment of river when surveyed {Lower, Middle, Upper); Target species (especially kings, reds, or "other" [which included silvers, pinks, trout, and Dollies); Whether the user was on a guided trip. For the follow -up survey, users, guides, and landowners were categorized by the type of activity they self- identified as their "most important." The five choices included: Bank angling (including personal use fishing from shore); Powerboat angling (including personal use fishing from a boat); Driftboat angling; Scenic boating; and Other non angling activities, including camping. If a respondent did not indicate a "most important" activity, we reviewed other information to determine their user category (see details in supplemental report). Responses to other questions were also used to categorize respondents, including: Segment of river (identified itt their "most important" activity /segment; Type of boat they use; Whether they always/sometimes/never take guided trips; Whether they own land along the river (and on which segment); and Alaska residency. Activities and segments Respondents were asked to identify which activities and segments they used on the Kenai River, as well as their first and second most important activities and segments. Percent reporting opportunities For users and landowners, Table 4 -1 shows the percent reporting activities on specific segments. Results highlight the diversity of trips that people take, and support having respondents self identify their most important type of trip. Other findings include: Relatively fewer bank anglers take boating -based trips compared to the number of boating -based anglers that take bank angling trips. There is considerable "crossover" between driftboat and powerboat angling trips. although majorities in each group do not participate in the other. There is less "crossover" between angling and scenic rafting, although 20% of driftboat anglers have taken Upper River scenic rafting trips. Landowners have an activity segment profile most similar to powerboat anglers than other types of users. Table 4 -1. Percent engaging in activity 1 segment "opportunities" by major groups. Bank angling Personal use from beach Lower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Personal use from boat Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River tber 2 Bank Driftboat Powerboat Scenic Campers Landowners anglers anglers anglers rafters 17 10 6 3 15 8 39 11 34 0 30 24 54 19 34 6 30 46 59 45 26 12 57 19 Drift angling Lower River 6 25 12 0 0 12 Middle River 9 50 15 9 9 16 Upper River 20 83 27 21 22 22 6 10 37 0 13 35 16 16 72 0 17 46 10 18 58 3 9 48 12 4 8 2 6 3 24 13 22 5 20 :8 64 13 15 Camping 31 24 18 9 100 0 Note: Percentages within groups can exceed 100 because users could check any that apply." ank angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Drift angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River Octo er Ken For guides, Table 4-2 shows the percent offering different activity /segment opportunities. Guides also show diversity among trips, although they are more likely to specialize in one type of angling trip (powerboats vs. drift boats) or scenic trips. Note: Boating -based fishing guides offer "bank angling" (usually for reds) via boat -based access, so this is different than users identified as "bank anglers" in the user survey. Other findings include: Powerboat guides are less likely to offer bank angling on their trips than driftboat guides. There is some "crossover" between drift and powerboat guides, but most do one or the other. Less than one -fifth of driftboat guides offer powerboat trips and less than a third of powerboat guides offer driftboat trips. There is generally less "crossover" between angling and scenic guides, although 30% of Upper River driftboat guides offer scenic trips. Table 4 -2. Percent of guides who offer activity I segment "opportunities." Powerboat guides 31 43 10' Most important opportunities 19 28 13 98 67 3 6 Driftboat guides 6 67 64 32 81 77 17 17 0 9 30 Scenic guides 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 0 0 29 71 t. This includes some guides who also offer driftboat trips on the Upper River, where boat -based bank angling is common. Table 4 -3 shows the "most important" opportunities for users, landowners, and guides. Because this variable was the primary way respondents were categorized, percentages are given only for opportunities that vary within a group (e.g., driftboat opportunities for driftboat anglers). Campers are not shown (by definition, 100% reported camping most important). More bank anglers find the Middle and Upper Rivers most important. Many more driftboat anglers and guides consider the Upper River most important. More powerboat anglers and powerboat guides consider the Lower River most important. Landowners are more interested in powerboat angling on the Lower River. PEal 4 -3. Percent of users, landowners, and guides identifying opportunities as "most important." Land- owners 2 6 23 5 <1 5 10 21 17 1 <1 2 Bank angling Personal use from beach Lower River Middle River Upper River Drift angling m ower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Personal use from boat Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River Bank Drift- Power- Scenic anglers boat boat rafters anglers anglers 8 20 34 31 0i' 10 19 68 14 50 25 12 12 76 All guides 2 7 14 Note. Percentages within groups may not equal 100 due to item non- response for most important opportunity. 57 76 13 19 1 Power- Drift boat boat guides guides 6 30 64 Users, landowners, and guides were also asked to identify their second most important opportunity. A cross tabulation of first by second most important opportunity is given in the supplemental report (not shown here), but key findings include: Of users reporting driftboat angling most important, less than 10 percent chose any powerboating opportunity second. Of users reporting powerboat angling most important, 24% chose Middle River driftboat angling and 13% chose Upper River driftboat angling second. Taken together, results suggest more powerboat anglers may be slightly more interested in driftboat trips than the converse. Of guides reporting a powerboat angling trip most important, over 75% chose the other powerboating opportunity second. There is a core group of powerboat guides whose focus is exclusively powerboat -based angling. Of guides reporting Upper River driftboat angling most important, 26% chose a powerboating opportunity second (with most choosing the Middle River). Taken together, results generally suggest driftboat guides are more likely to be interested in powerboat trips than the converse. About one quarter who chose driftboat angling first chose bank angling second. Less than 15% who chose powerboat angling first chose bank angling second. a L 2010 Pace Guided vs. unguided use anal Table 4 -4 shows the proportion of users and landowners who take guided fishing trips or utilize other commercial services. Findings include: Just under half of driftboat and powerboat anglers take guided fishing trips sometimes, with 23% taking there "frequently." Among bank anglers, 29% have taken guided fishing trips from a boat, but only 6% do so frequently. No scenic rafters or campers take guided fishing trips frequently, but over 20% have taken them "sometimes." Over half of scenic rafters take guided scenic rafting trips. Few anglers take guided scenic raft trips (13% or less). Few Kenai users rent boats on their trips (less than 10% among the three angling groups). Scenic rafters and campers are slightly more likely to rent boats. Most landowners do not use commercial services; 98% never rent boats, 91% never use shuttles or take a scenic rafting trip, and 79% never taking guided fishing trips. Table 4.4. Proportion of users and landowners that use commercial services. Camp on the river Table 4 -5 shows the proportion of users and landowners who camp on the river (not in developed campgrounds). Most users never take overnight trips, suggesting the Kenai is primarily a "day use frontcountry" river. However, 26% of driftboat anglers and 38% of scenic rafters camp on their trips. Discussions with rangers and fieldwork suggest there are about 14 to 16 "backcountry" campsites in common use on the Upper River or near the inlet to Skilak Lake and an additional 10 to 12 on the Middle River (all between Skilak and Kenai Keys). There are no commonly used campsites below Kenai Keys or on the Lower River (more private land and public land typically has developed campgrounds or "no camping" regulations). 2010 n Never Sometimes Frequently take guided fishing trip Sometimes frequently guided rafting Sometimes frequently rent boat Sometimes I frequently use shuttles Bank anglers 318 71 23 6 12 7 12 Driftboat anglers 274 55 22 23 13 10 47 Powerboat anglers 191 56 21 23 6 6 14 Scenic rafters 33 79 21 0 52 16 25 Campers 23 77 23 0 28 18 26 Mixed users 13 46 23 31 11 0 11 Landowners 208 79 16 5 9 2 9 Guided vs. unguided use anal Table 4 -4 shows the proportion of users and landowners who take guided fishing trips or utilize other commercial services. Findings include: Just under half of driftboat and powerboat anglers take guided fishing trips sometimes, with 23% taking there "frequently." Among bank anglers, 29% have taken guided fishing trips from a boat, but only 6% do so frequently. No scenic rafters or campers take guided fishing trips frequently, but over 20% have taken them "sometimes." Over half of scenic rafters take guided scenic rafting trips. Few anglers take guided scenic raft trips (13% or less). Few Kenai users rent boats on their trips (less than 10% among the three angling groups). Scenic rafters and campers are slightly more likely to rent boats. Most landowners do not use commercial services; 98% never rent boats, 91% never use shuttles or take a scenic rafting trip, and 79% never taking guided fishing trips. Table 4.4. Proportion of users and landowners that use commercial services. Camp on the river Table 4 -5 shows the proportion of users and landowners who camp on the river (not in developed campgrounds). Most users never take overnight trips, suggesting the Kenai is primarily a "day use frontcountry" river. However, 26% of driftboat anglers and 38% of scenic rafters camp on their trips. Discussions with rangers and fieldwork suggest there are about 14 to 16 "backcountry" campsites in common use on the Upper River or near the inlet to Skilak Lake and an additional 10 to 12 on the Middle River (all between Skilak and Kenai Keys). There are no commonly used campsites below Kenai Keys or on the Lower River (more private land and public land typically has developed campgrounds or "no camping" regulations). 2010 Kenai Table 45. Percent of respondents who camp on the river (not in developed campgrounds). Bank anglers 318 93 7 <1' Driftboat anglers 274 72 22 6 Powerboat anglers 191 86 12 2 Scenic rafters 33 63 19 19 Campers 23 74 22 4 Landowners 208 87 12 1 Types of boats Respondents were asked if they use a boat on their trips; for those who did, other questions asked about types of boats and other characteristics. Results are given in Table 4 -6. Notes: User and landowner respondents did not have to own boats just use them (could be rented, a friend's, a guide's, etc.). For guides, the question referred to boats used during guiding. This was for any opportunity (not just their "most important and percentages can exceed 100 because they could check more than one type. Table 46. Percent who use boats (and which type) on Kenai River trips. Power. boat anglers use a boat 45 100 100 Bank anglers Drift anglers Of those who use a boat, what percent use... kayak <1 3 canoe <1 4 driftboat 19 69 raft or cataraft 88 39 "fish cat" 3 16 powerboat 26 29 c °i ;d E r 2g 1V N never sometimes frequently Scenic rafters Campers Ail users 72 48 75 12 9 2 9 4 2 21 17 38 58 26 23 0 0 8 6 13 41 Land- owners 86 All guides 100 77 Many Kenai River users have used boats on the river (even among bank anglers and campers). Key findings include: Drift anglers were more likely to report use of driftboats or rafts, while powerboat anglers were more likely to report use of powerboats. Bank anglers were more likely to use driftboats or rafts rather than powerboats. Landowners were more likely to use powerboats, but many who have both. Further analysis shows that among landowners that use powerboats, 23% also use drift boats; among those who use drift craft, 82% also use powerboats. Other analysis suggests that among the majority (54 of guides who use a raft or driftboat, 73% also use powerboats. Among guides that use drift craft, 16% use rafts or catarafts and 92% use drift boats. October rr01 0 c Of those who use a boat, respondents were asked which boat they used most often; results are given in Table 4 -7. These percentages sum to 100 because uses could only name one. Findings include: Roughly similar proportions of bank anglers use motorized and non motorized craft "most often." A majority of drift anglers use driftboats more often than rafts, catarafts, or fish cats. e About 4% of drift anglers report they use a powerboat most often, just as small proportions of powerboat anglers use driftboats or rafts "most often." They were probably unsure how to classify a driftboat with a kicker. Most landowners and guides use a powerboat most often. Table 4.7. Most often used boat types on Kenai River trips. Bank Drift Powerboat Scenic Ail anglers anglers anglers rafters users kayak <1 0 0 9 <1 canoe <1 0 0 0 <1 driftboat 26 59 4 14 33 raft or cataraft 20 30 5 77 22 "fish cat" 2 7 <1 0 4 powerboat 49 4 90 0 41 Land- Ali owners guides 2 0 1 0 5 19 2 8 0 0 90 73 Of those who use driftboats, rafts, or catarafts, 55% of users and 58% of guides use a motor (typically kicker motors Less than 10 horsepower) for different purposes. Key findings include: Scenic boaters are more likely use a kicker to cross Skilak after running Kenai Canyon (18 than for any other reason (less than 6 on the Lower or Middle River. Drift anglers were most likely to use kickers for crossing Skilak after a Canyon trip (35%), but were also likely to use there to access the Middle River from Lower Skilak (20 travel upstream to re- drift a reach on the Middle River (18 or travel against the tide on the Lower River (10 Among drift guides, percentages using kickers were higher than for users. About 36% use them to cross Skilak after a Canyon trip, 31% use then; for re- drifting reaches on the Middle Ri 25% use them to access the Middle River from Lower Skilak, and 20% use them to travel against tides on the Lower River. Only 9% use them to back troll on the Middle River. Among guides who reported driftboats as their most often used craft, over half use them to cross Skilak after a Canyon trip (55 or to access the Middle River (50 smaller proportions use them to re -drift reaches on the Middle River (11 Among landowners who use drift craft with kickers, the most popular purposes are to cross Skilak after a Canyon trip (29 access the Middle River (17 re -drift reaches of the Middle River (20 or travel against the tide on the Lower River (17 Respondents who use powerboats were asked to report boat lengths, hull types, and percent using four stroke motors. Results are summarized in Table 4 -8. Compared to guides, users and landowners (on average) are more likely to have smaller boats, flat hulls, and not have four stroke engines (now required in July; soon to be required on the entire river). Table 4.8. Information about powerboats (among those who use them). Length(average) Length (interquartile range) Hull type vee or semi -vee Hull type flat four stroke motor All uses who reported about powerboats n =279 18.2 16 to 20 67 33 85 Users for whom powerboat trips most important n =191 18.5 17 to 20 77 23 93 Land ownership and property characteristics Most users at public facilities do not own land on the river; the 4% who reported owning land from this study is similar to proportion in 1992. This also supports the decision to sample landowners separately (because few utilize public facilities where sampling can occur). 4-9. Property characteristics among guides and landowners (percent). Percent on Lower River Percent on Middle River Percent on Upper River Percent have residence on property Percent not a resident Percent part -time resident Percent full -time resident Percent use a boat from the property Percent fish from the prope Percent have a dock Percent have a fishing platform Percent natural materials erosion control Have non- natural erosion control (rip rap) Percent offer some kind of lodging Cabins Rooms (e.g., motel) Other Cctobr,) 2010 Landowners Guides who own property 39 52 9 89 18 40 41 67 76 31 29 41 0 Not asked Guides who reported about powerboats n =165 20.0 20 to 20 77 23 99 Landowners who reported about powerboats n =187 51 36 13 85 9 38 53 73 63 32 38 45 14 30 12 2 16 18.3 17 to 19 61 39 86 n a'' ecreatio, Among guides, 30% own land, a substantially higher percentage than for users. There are obvious advantages to staging guided trips from private property or integrating guide services with lodging or other commercial activities (see Table 4 -9). Findings include: Compared to non -guide landowners, higher proportions of guides own property on the Lower River, which is the focus of guided king fishing. Lower proportions of guides do not reside on the property. Similar proportions of all landowners have docks, fishing platforms, and erosion control on their banks. Majorities of both groups fish or use a boat from the property. Age and gender Respondents were asked to report their age and gender (Table 4 -10). Findings include: Over 80% of anglers are men and they tend to be older than the general population. Non anglers are more likely to have gender balance (within a few points of 50 -50). Landowners are generally older than users. Guides tend to be slightly younger than users but are more predominately male. Differences between other groups were generally small. Table 4 -10. Age and gender of major groups. Mean age male All users 50 83 M landowners 63 82 All guides 44 95 Alaska residents Respondents were asked about their residency in Alaska; results by group are in the supplemental report. proportions were similar to those from 1992; key findings include: The highest proportions of Alaskan residents were among unguided powerboat anglers (84%) and unguided driftboat anglers (79 The lowest proportions were among guided powerboat anglers (36 and guided driftboat anglers (39 Over half of bank anglers (52 and campers (62%©) were AK residents. Among landowners, 85% were AK residents. Among guides, 72% were AK residents. Or ber 231E Page 36 Hosting and visitation information Respondents (except for guides) were asked about the number of days they hosted guests from in /out of state (if they were Alaska residents and live in the Kenai Basin) or about the number of days they visit the area (if they were non residents or live outside the basin). Summary information is provided in Table 4- 11; additional data are provided in the supplemental report. Findings highlight the substantial number of visitors who stay in the area with local residents or in commercial lodging (contributing to the local economy). Table 4 -11. Hosting and visitation information for users and landowners. Among those who live in the watershed (Residents) Average days hosting out of state Median days hosting out of state friendslfamily Average days hosting in -state friendsltamily Median days hosting instate friends /family Among those who visit the watershed (Non residents those who live outside the watershed) Median days on Kenai Peninsula Median days in Alaska camped in a campground stayed in hotels /motels stayed with family and friends day users camped in the backcountry stayed in bed and breakfast/ lodges October 2010 Users 20 ;0 =168 15.6 10 18.3 10 80 %;n =684 8 11 36 21 19 12 8 8 Landowners n 208 20.1 14 26 15 Not applicable Median years on Kenai first year Median days per year Experience on the river On -site surveys asked users to describe their experience on the river (number of years and days per year). Medians for major groups are provided in Table 4 -12; additional data for segments and sub- groups are in the supplemental report. Findings include: About 62 to 76% of Kenai users have been using the river for less than 5 to 8 years, 24 to 38% were visiting for the first time in 2009. For most users, conditions in recent years are "what they. know." However, there are also many long -term users. Averages were much higher than medians due to some high outliers (so medians reflect the "central tendency" of the distribution of responses better), but some groups average over a decade of experience using the river. For example, unguided drift anglers averaged 11 years of experience while guided drift anglers averaged 4 (and over half of these users were first year visitors). Unguided powerboat anglers averaged 23 years, while guided powerboat anglers averaged 9. Some examples: Unguided drift anglers averaged 17 days per year while guided drift anglers averaged 5. Unguided powerboat anglers averaged 14 days, while guided powerboat anglers averaged 9. Powerboat anglers generally have more years of experience, while bank and powerboat anglers tend to use the river more days per year. Table 4-12. Years of experience and days per year for major user groups. Bank anglers 5 30 9 Drift anglers 5 29 Powerboat anglers 8 24 5 10 'o n,1 Non- anglers .0 38 The guide survey also asked experience questions (years on the river, years guiding, days guiding per year, and estimated clients per year). Results are summarized in Table 4 -13; additional data are in the supplemental report. Findings include: Guides average over 20 years on the river and 13 years guiding. Few guides had less than two years experience. Scenic guides guide fewest days per year, while drift guides guide the most. Drift guides probably have a longer season because they tend to target trout Dollies into early fall, while some powerboats guides stop guiding after kings (July) or early silvers (August). Scenic rafting may tail off in late July when the weather typically turns colder and wetter. More days per year is generally associated with more clients per year, but estimated clients per year suggest drift boat fishing guides average slightly more clients per day than powerboat guides (4.1 vs. 3.3). 2009 fishing guide logbook data from ADFG suggests that Upper River guides (who are all drift guides) averaged exactly 3.0 anglers per trip, which is probably a better estimate of the number of clients per boat. ADFG logbook data for the Middle and Lower River is not segregated by drift vs. powerboat guides, so estimates for those groups cannot be compared to survey results. Non anglers had slightly higher percentages of first year users and spent fewer days on the river. Notes: The guide survey asked about days per year for a "typical year" (not 2009) to avoid confounding results for a potentially "atypical" year like 2009. A separate question asked guides to roughly estimate whether the number of days guiding or clients were different in 2009 (details are in the supplemental report). Trip characteristics Group size Trip lengths Typical boating segments Drift anglers Oslo 1010 c Table 4 -13. Years of experience and days per year for guides. All guides Average years 20,1 Percent in first two years 4 Average years guiding 12.7 Average days /year (not 2009) 63 Average clients /year (not 2009) 221 Powerboat Drift boat Scenic trip guides guides guides 21.6 15.6 15.4 <1 13 29 13.9 8.8 10.7 61 75 43 202 308 124 The on -site surveys asked several questions about specific trip characteristics. Findings for major groups are summarized below. More details are in the supplemental report. Over 90% of all groups have 6 or fewer people. Other findings include: Boat -based angling groups average 3 to 4 per boat (depending on type of trip and segment). Two- thirds of bank anglers fish alone or with one partner only. Guided fishing boats average about 1 person more than unguided boats. For powerboat anglers, group sizes are slightly larger during kings compared to trips after July. Non guided users had a median group size of 4, but sometimes traveled in larger groups (especially for scenic rafting trips). Most Kenai River users take day trips, although many camp in developed campgrounds. Among day users, typical trip lengths are 5 to 8 hours on the river (does not include travel tunes to the river, launching, etc.). Other findings include: Bank angling trips average about 6 hours for all three segments, with small differences between seasons or target species. Drift angling trips average about 7 hours, with trips on the Middle River slightly longer (8 hours) and trips on the Upper River slightly shorter (6 hours). This fits with some logistical considerations regarding the Middle River (time crossing Skilak). Powerboat angling trips average about 6.5 hours, with slightly longer trips (8) on the Middle River after July (when the focus shifts to trout, Dollies, and silvers). Drift anglers were asked to identify their put -in and were interviewed at their take -out which can help identify the popularity of various "floats." Detailed findings are presented in the supplemental report. Findings include: Pa.e Trip characteristics Non- anglers October 2 E's l oon Most Lower River drift trips (63 start from Centennial. Park, although others start at Pillars (10 and River Bend (12 Eagle Rock (4 or other private land launches /docks. Most end at Pillars or Eagle Rock, although a few continue to private launches at Beaver Creek or Kenai Boat Ramp. Most Middle River drift trips (75 start from Lower Skilak, although a few anglers (less than 7% each) start from Dot's (Kenai Keys), Bing's Landing, Izaak Walton, or easements off Keystone Road. Most Upper River drift trips (74 start from Sportsman's Landing, but 23% begin at Cooper Landing Bridge. Very few start at Jim's Landing (the most popular take -out) or private land in Cooper Landing. Note: The proportion taking the Sportsman's Jim's Landing trip appears higher among 2009 users than the 2004 USFWS (where the proportion was 55 This may indicate a shift to shorter trips and a greater focus on angling time in the productive waters below Sportsman's. Powerboat anglers on Lower River Powerboat anglers on were asked to identify the segments they used on the Lower River. Detailed results are in the supplemental report; findings include: Eleven percent of powerboat anglers could not specify the segments they use. The number is higher among anglers targeting kings (19 and especially among guided anglers targeting kings (36 Many of these anglers may not know where they fished because they rely on the boat driver or guide to select the most promising locations. Of those targeting kings who did specify segments, the highest use occurs from the Chinook sonar to Pillars (50 and Pillars to Poacher's Cove (46 Far fewer anglers used the river below the sonar (9 or above Poacher's Cove (16 Of those targeting other species, use is more evenly distributed, with 32% using the mouth to sonar; 47% using sonar to Pillars, 30% using Pillars to Poacher's, and. 11% using Poachers to Soldotna Bridge. Note that anglers reporting use of a segment does not necessarily correlate with the amount of time spent in each segment. ADF &G boat counts during king season offer opportunities for more in -depth analysis of segment distributions. Powerboat guides were asked to identify the launch they use most often. For the Lower River, 38% use public launches most often (Pillars at 22 Centennial at 19 and Swiftwater at 4 but private launches are also well -used (including 22% combined at Stewarts, RiverBend, and Poacher's Cove; 4% at Eagle Rock, and 18% at other private residences), For the Middle River, most guides (63 use Bing's Landing, while some use Lower Skilak (8 Swiftwater (7 Centennial (7 and other private launches /docks (12 Most non anglers in this study were scenic rafters on the Upper River (81 About 67% were on scenic raft trips (with one -third of the sample guided). About 10% used the Lower River and 9% used the Middle River. Target species and fishing statistics Onsite surveys asked anglers to identify 1) all species they were fishing for; 2) their primary target species; 3) how many fish they caught, released, and kept (all species); and 4) whether other anglers in their group were successful. The primary goal was to categorize anglers by target species and indicate individual fishing success (which might correlate with other variables in the study). These questions were not intended to estimate harvest, catch and release rates, or address other fishery management issues, although information provides relative indicators of fishing success rates that generally fit with ADF &G fishery statistics from multiple sources. General conclusions are provided below; more detailed information is in the supplemental report. Bank anglers Most bank anglers fish for reds: 50% on the Lower River, 84% on the Middle River, and 90% on the Upper River. King salmon are the primary target for 14% of Lower River bank anglers and 3% on the Middle River; silvers are the primary target for 30% on the Lower River anglers and 7% on the Middle and Upper River. Trout and Dollies are primary targets for less than 3% of bank anglers on any segment (Note: this does not include boat -based anglers that may fish for these species from the bank or wading). Success hooking fish is largely driven by target species. More than two thirds of red and silver anglers hooked at least one fish; king anglers had lower catch rates. On the Upper River, first red run anglers hooked (10.5) and kept (2.3) roughly twice as many fish as second red run anglers (4.9 and 1.0), which fits with the run limits (6 for the first, 3 for the second). Total kept fish is well below limits; despite anecdotes, most red anglers do not "limit out." Drift anglers Drift anglers fish for a variety of species, but there are segment /season differences. For example, 88% of Lower River drift anglers target kings on "drift only Mondays" compared to 4% on the Middle River. Reds are not the primary target for most drift anglers, especially on the Lower and Middle Rivers (less than 8 but 26% target reds on the Upper. Silvers are the primary target for less than 11% on the Lower and Middle, and only 2% on the Upper. Trout/Dollies are the primary target for about 70% of Middle and Upper anglers. Success hooking fish is largely driven by target species, with trout/Dolly anglers averaging 11.9 hooked fish, red anglers 6.8, silver anglers 3.6 and king anglers 2.0. These success rates are generally similar to powerboat anglers and higher than bank anglers. Success hooking fish was weakly correlated with the number of days an angler fishes per year (r =.14) and being on a guided trip (r=.21). Powerboat anglers Powerboat anglers also fish for a diversity of species, with specific targets for seasons and segments. During king seasons, the focus is on the Lower River (87% identify kings as the primary target before August), compared to the Middle River (21 In the second red run, 32% of Middle River powerboat anglers target reds first compared to 11% on the Lower River. After July, silvers become the focus for 92% of Lower River powerboaters and 48% of Middle River powerboaters. Most of the remaining Middle River powerboat anglers (45 target trout /Dollies. Success hooking fish is largely driven by target species, with trout /Dolly anglers averaging 13.5 hooked fish, red anglers 2.9, silver anglers 4.1 and king anglers 0.6. These success rates tend to be October higher than those for bank anglers, but similar to drift anglers (the notable exception is kings, where drift anglers did better). Success hooking fish was not correlated with the number of days an angler fishes per year; there was a strong correlation between success and being on a guided trip for trout (r=.46), but it was somewhat lower for silvers (.27) and not significant for kings or reds. Non angler activities Non- anglers during the on -site survey were asked to indicate activities they did on their trips. Rafting was the most common non angling activity (67 but 54% reported viewing scenery, 44% viewing wildlife, 34% picnicking or rafting, and 28% camping. Asked to identify a single primary activity, 56% reported rafting and 14% camping, 10% viewing scenery, 8% picnicking, and 3% viewing wildlife. 0Aob r 2010 P.4i-e 44 e ai R.ec e gig Fkidi and ications This chapter provides information from guides who target kings on the Lower River; the information comes from the guide follow -up survey. Information helps characterize important use patterns and factors that influence where anglers fish, with implications for other management issues. Factors influencing fishing locations My personal knowledge Personal success from recent days Tidal information Water clarity Seeing others succeed (nets up) Water level information Fishing reports from recent days Fishing reports while on river Seeing few other boats at a location Seeing many boats at a location Client preferences for a specific location Sonar counts Information from ADF&G net boat Close to the launch l use Not a 5. Lower River King Fishing Trends Guides were asked to rate the importance of factors influencing "when, where, and how long" they fish for king salmon. Responses were on a 5 -point scale from "not at all important" to "extremely important." Figure 5 -1 ranks responses of all guides who answered these questions (n =134) by mean scores; additional analyses in the supplemental report examined differences between drift (n-24) and powerboat guides (n =114). Slightly Moderately Very Average importance rating Figure 5 -1. Importance of factors influencing where, when and how long king guides fish. all Extremely Findings include: Guides consider personal knowledge and recent success most important. Tides are also important. Focus group discussion and fishing guide books suggest that many users target incoming tides in the lower segments of the Lower River and then move upstream during slack or outgoing tides. This can concentrate use, increasing crowding. Water clarity and water level (often related) may make some fishing areas more challenging and further concentrate use when conditions are poor. Success of other anglers, fishing reports from recent days, and fishing reports while on the river are moderately important and may also concentrate users. Like some wildlife viewing opportunities (e.g. whale watching), success attracts more use, which might increase crowding, competition, and potentially decrease future success. October 2010 Page 45 pw Recreaton stud F rac ras and jmphcOons Early morning fishing success Being first (6 am opening) important for success Fishing is better in morning diminishes thru day Fishing techniques The number of boats seen at a location appears to have a smaller influence on where guides go. Actual success appears to count more. Few guides base their fishing location choices on the number of fish in the river (from sonar or net counts from ADF &G), or proximity to their launch. Differences between powerboat and drift guides were generally small, although drift guides rated tides less important (it is logistically challenging to time tides without a motor), and seeing many boats, sonar counts, client preferences for locations, and proximity to launches more important. Differences appear related to specific drift trip logistics (difficulty fighting tides, need for easy launch and shuttle) or greater sensitivity to higher densities. The spike of powerboating use as guide hours open (6 am, Tuesday through Saturday) is a well -known phenomenon on the Lower River. The survey asked guides about reasons for the "rush" as fishing opens; responses were on a five point agree disagree scale with a neutral option (Figure 5 -2). Most guides agree that "being among the first boats at a location when guide hours open (6 am) is important" and "aside from tidal considerations, king salmon fishing is generally better in the morning and diminishes through the day." 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly disagree/0 slightly or strongy agree Figure 5 2. Percent of guides that agreeldisagree with reasons that may explain 6 am peaks. Focus group discussion suggests this is mostly about perceived competition for "early biters," fish that enter the river or reach holes when angler densities are low over night and have not yet been exposed to many lures /bait. Guides noted that early morning unguided users who are allowed to fish before the 6 am opening are very successful. ADF &G boat count and creel survey technicians note anecdotal evidence that many anglers have success early in the day, but they are less certain that success rates continue to diminish through the day and some guides apparently agree. These findings suggest that strategies to reduce crowding by redistributing use to later in the day are likely to be resisted by many anglers. Similarly, guides opposed "staggered guide hours" (e.g., if half of the guides start an hour later than the other half on alternating days) in the 1992 and this study (see Chapter 12). Taken together with information from focus groups, many guides simply appear reluctant to give up the most productive hour every other day even if they might have less competition the next day. Guides were asked to estimate the percent of time they fish with different techniques. Most prefer back trolling (70 fewer prefer back- bouncing (21 or drifting /dragging (22 Conflicts between anglers October 2010 Pap 46 Kenai Recreat Stu Mar Fi, n ngL5 mp c1 ns using different techniques (especially when densities are high) were mentioned in several focus groups. These tend to occur in specific traditional "drifting /dragging" reaches (see additional discussion in Chapter 12). King salmon trends in recent years Guides were asked whether they agreed or disagreed (on the same 5 point scale with a neutral option) with several statements about king fishing trends. Results are shown in Figure 5 -3. ...more boats fishing below mile 6 sonar more boats are "fishing the tides" more unguided boats during guide hours more inexperienced boaters during guide hours fewer boats recognizing traditional "drift" areas more rental boats during guide hours more non motorized boats during guide hours 38% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% "strongly" or "slightly" disagree "slightly" or "strongly" agree Figure 5 -3. Agreement with statements about king salmon fishing trends in recent years. Findings include: Most guides agree use in recent years has been generally shifting farther downstream, with more boats fishing the tides. In focus groups, some described trolling and back bouncing techniques that increase success in these areas even when tides are less favorable. These trends may increase the miles of river anglers can fish, which can reduce crowding. However, if this success becomes well publicized, it may also concentrate use in these lower river areas. Most guides believe the number of unguided users has increased during guide hours, but ADF &G boat count data do not confirm this. Although total use levels may be higher in recent years (excepting 2009), it is not clear that unguided use accounts for the increase. Guided boats accounted for about two thirds of Lower River counts during the 2009 king season and this is much higher than the one third estimate given in the 1992 study. Fewer guides agree that "fewer boats recognize traditional drifting/dragging (not back trolling) areas." Guides who drift or drag more often were more likely to agree with this statement. Many guides agree there are more rental boats and inexperienced boaters during guide hours. We don't have independent confirmation of this trend, but it fits with guide opinions about guide /unguided conflicts and boating safety (see Chapter 15). Preferred fishing technique did not predict any other fishing trend. October 2010 page 47 R ti n Stud.MaJprELndnsandipicaU.ons October 2010 Page 48 Perceived crowding a Recreation Study Maior Pm t s and Irn "cations 6. On -river Crowding, Impacts, and Use- Impact Relationships This chapter presents on -site survey information about perceived crowding, reported impacts, tolerances for impacts, and use impact relationships. Crowding provides a broad indicator of visitor impact problems and whether use is below, at; or over "capacity." Reported impacts (and related tolerances) can help ident potential management standards, for indicator impacts and whether current conditions are exceeding them. Use impact relationships show whether managing use (through direct limits or indirect methods) is likely to reduce impacts. Most theorists recognize a difference between use density and crowding, but even scientists sometimes use the word "crowding" inappropriately when referring to high density (Shelby et al., 1989). Density is a descriptive term that refers to the number of people per unit area. It is measured by counting the number of people and measuring the space they occupy, and it can be determined objectively. Crowding, on the other hand, is a negative evaluation of density; it involves a value, judgment that the specified number is too many. The term perceived crowding is often used to emphasize the subjective or evaluative nature of the concept. Perceived crowding combines descriptive information (the density or encounter level experienced by the individual.) with evaluative information (the individual's negative evaluation of that density or encounter Ievel). When people evaluate an area as crowded, they have at least implicitly compared the conditions they experienced (impacts) with their perception of what is acceptable (standards). If they conclude that the area is crowded, it would appear that the existing conditions exceeded their definition of a standard (one criterion for an area being "over capacity Researchers have developed a simple measure of perceived crowding (Heberlein Vaske, 1977). The question asks people how crowded they feel during their visit. Responses are given on a 9 -point scale: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Not at all Slightly Moderately Extremely Crowded Crowded Crowded Crowded The approach is simple and easy to apply. Two of the nine scale points on the crowding scale label the situation as uncrowded, while the remaining seven points label it as crowded to some degree. The scale can be analyzed in different ways. The scale has traditionally been collapsed into a dichotomous variable (not crowded versus any degree of crowding; the fat mula that was used here). This provides a conceptually meaningful break point between those who labeled the situation as not at all crowded (scale points 1 and 2, a positive evaluation), and those who labeled the situation as slightly, moderately, or extremely crowded (scale points 3 through 9, a negative evaluation). Since 1975, this single item indicator has been used in over 200 studies conducted across the United States (e.g., Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin), Canada (British Columbia, Alberta), New Zealand, Australia, and Korea resulting in crowding ratings for over 500 different settings /activities. The activities included hiking, backpacking, wildlife viewing, wildlife photography, hunting of many types, fishing of many types, rafting, canoeing, tubing, motor boating, rock climbing, sailing, and driving for pleasure. The areas studied represented considerable diversity, with some showing extremely high October 2€10 Page 49 Kenai R Studer a or !icatio s density and use impact problems, others showing low densities and no problems, and still others actively utilizing management strategies to control densities and use impacts. A meta- analysis of 35 studies (Shelby, et al., 1989) identified five "rule of thumb" categories of crowding when the scale was collapsed in the manner described in Table 6 -1. A substantially larger rneta- analysis by the same authors supports continued use of this simple analytic technique, which helps categorize whether a resource is likely to have capacity visitor impact problems (and helps managers consider potential responses). Table 6-1. Carrying capacity judgments based on levels of perceived crowding. 0 -35% 50 -65% Very low crowding High normal 80-100% Greatly over capacity Impacts and crowding related problems are likely; manage for high density recreation or reduce use to provide higher quality. Source Shelby, Vaske, Heberlem (1989) Perceived crowding by segment season group "context" Crowding usually limited by management or situational factors (remote location, difficult access, or permit programs). Studies or focused management attention may be needed if increased use is expected, allowing management to anticipate problems. For the Kenai, percent feeling crowded for several segment season group "contexts" are provided in Table 6 -2. Results indicate several general findings: Five of the six highest crowding ratings for 2009 were on the Upper River. As discussed in Chapter 3, the first run red season on the Upper River had the highest use levels and densities on the entire river in 2009, and they were among the highest use levels ever on that section of river. in addition, boat counts during trout/dolly season approached levels common in the traditionally higher use red runs, and these appear to be rising in recent years. These use levels produce high crowding and represent situations needing management attention. Higher use days for Lower River for powerboat anglers during the second run of kings also showed high crowding; this is traditionally the highest use boating fishery on the river. There are many "low normal" and "high normal" crowding ratings, as well as some "no crowding" situations that may provide low density experiences. October 2010 Page 50 Table 6-2. Percent feeling crowded and mean crowding scores for 2009 Kenai River groups. 88 d�a Over capacity: Studies and management likely needed to preserve quality Upper early red run bank anglers Kane £e r i n #u IVIr and tm ions Upper weekends drift anglers rl Upper weekends bank anglers Middle second red run peak bank anglers Upper all drift anglers Upper weekdays in Sep drift anglers Upper second red run bank anglers Lower drift anglers Low Normai: Unlikely to be a problem; may offer important Middle bank anglers Upper bank anglers Middle drift unguided anglers Middle drift anglers Middle after kings power anglers Middle other times power anglers October 2010 Percent feeling crowdedf 70 66 Mean 5.4 64 63 62 62 57 56 54 53 ow densi pmt 47 experiences 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.2 45 39 34 30 7 1 Percent reporting 3 through 9 "slightly, moderately, or extremely° crowded) on the scale. 2.9 1 2.9 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.7 Pago 51 Kenai i.ecr n Stud Table 6 -2 includes mean perceived crowding scores which are a highly correlated with "percent feeling crowded;" they can be used to statistically compare groups. Findings include: 9 Crowding was statistically higher on weekends vs. weekdays for all drift anglers, particularly on the Upper River and in September. Use levels show a strong pattern of higher use on weekends, and higher perceived crowding scores follow. Weekends vs. weekdays crowding scores were not statistically different for powerboat anglers, probably because Tuesdays are among the highest use days and Sundays (with no guiding allowed) tend to have lower use levels similar to weekdays (aside from Tuesdays). High use and low use days (defined by actual use levels) show significant crowding differences. There were few weekday vs. weekend differences for bank anglers on the Upper River during the first red run. Perceived crowding scores followed from the date of run arrival and the date of the increase in harvest limits, not the day of the week. Crowding comparisons with other resources Table 6 -3 (following page) shows crowding ratings for other rivers in Alaska or the Lower 48, including Kenai groups /segments /seasons from the 1992 study. Taken together with the 2009 findings in Table 6- 2, findings include: There are times and places on the Kenai (in 1992 and 2009) when crowding is as high as any river studied. These "hot spots" are at greater risk for impact and congestion problems that discourage return use "displacement or cause users to adjust their expectations to fit with the new higher impact conditions "product shift These phenomena are further discussed in Chapter 8. Results also show many situations where crowding levels are much lower. Managing for a diversity of use, impact, and crowding levels snakes sense in a complex system like the Kenai, but it is challenging to develop standards that define "how much crowding is too much Additional discussion is needed to identify when conditions "break down" and reach unacceptable levels (see below). Comparisons between 1992 and 2009 are also challenging. However, a few situations persistently rank among the most crowded (first red run bank angling on the Upper River, drift angling on the Upper River during both red runs, and on weekends during trout/Dolly season, and Lower River powerboat angling for kings in July). Second run red bank anglers were generally more crowded in 1992 than in 2009. This finding is counter intuitive because riparian protection efforts have since closed about 26 miles of Kenai River bank fishing areas (providing fewer places from which bank anglers can fish during this run). We suspect bank angler use densities in rn.any areas have decreased despite the loss of bank angling access due to increased personal use fishing opportunities at the mouth (which did not exist in 1992). With more anglers participating in the dip net fishery during the second red run, the popularity of rod and reel fishing at this time may have declined and reduced. crowding. The important "take home" point is that changes in either fishery could affect use levels and crowding at the other. OctobeF 2.010 Page 52 Table 6-3. Percent feeling crowded at other rivers (including the Kenai in 1992, 2002). Kenai Rec Greatly over capacity: Manage for high densities; might be described as sacrifice area 100 Kenai River, Ak 1992 Upper river bank anglers on high use days Angtersal Thanksgiving (high use period} 94 Cobradc Rver Az 89 Little Susitna River, Ak 1990 All users 86 Kenai River, Ak 1992 mogaggel•aight: 81 Kenai River, AK 2002 October 2010 eaton Stu5jy MaioFirAino ap0. Implications :41'4 Upper river driftboaters on high use days Lower River powerboat anglers in July Over capacity: Studies and management likely needed 10 preserve quality 78 Kenai River, Ak 1992 Middle River powerboaters on high iiseclays Le 75 Waimakariri and Rakia Rivers, NZ Salmon anglers tatitatibit.M.031,100,,Uager 7 1 =inglageMlainggignatigt 69 Kanektok River, Ak 1996 Unguided floaters High Normal: Should be studied if use increases expected; managers mightantioipateproblems ::Lo 4,..,..„:„.„,..... 64 Talachulitna River, Ak 1990 Allusers_ 63 G ver,Ak 1 e 62 Kenai River, Ak 1992 59 Kanektok River, Ak 1996 All users Middle river bank anglers King salmon season ta River AK 2004 Lower Tangle Lakes Del 54 wffie 53 Kanektok River, Ak 1996 Guided users 51 Kroto Creek (Deshka), Ak 1990 All users if*2MifijiSgtMif.kiNvOiWaeliri7*3 48 Delta River, Ak 2004 Upper Tangle Lakes 41,i MZ 44 Delta River, Ak All respondents overall 43,Miiiiiiiiiiii;.,%4 42 Togiak River Ak 1996 36 Goodnews River, Ak 1996 Middle Fork users 4 :t 1 *:01 4 0:50,00 1 44 0 ebwdfn All users Middle Fork 33 Gulkana River, Ak 1999 27 Delta River, Ak 2004 Lower River ViallaNNOWWWICESERIftedow 14-19 Gwaii Haanas, BC 1998 Touring kayakers at various areas 1111,Cintli61#./44*SOICMiNsItigillt777777! tjoues 1 Percent reporting 3 through 9 ("slightly, moderately, or extremely" crowded) on the scale. Page 53 Crowding during different parts of a trip In addition to the overall crowding question, Kenai users were asked to report how crowded they felt during different parts of their trips (e.g., finding parking, at the boat ramps, while fishing, etc.); see Table 6 -4. Findings include: e Crowding "while fishing" was higher than crowding during other parts of the trip or overall. In general, this suggests that congestion at facilities or while traveling to fishing areas is less of a problem than finding an uncrowded place to fish (improved facilities will not reduce crowding while fishing, and could make it worse if facilities attract more use). The disparity between crowding while fishing and other parts of the trip are generally larger for bank anglers than drift or powerboat anglers. Drift anglers tend to feel more crowded at take -outs compared to put -ins. Among powerboat anglers, differences were smaller. The highest crowding percentages were for Upper River bank and drift anglers, and Lower River powerboat anglers. Crowding percentages were higher for king powerboat anglers while traveling to fishing on the Lower River, the segment/season with the highest boat densities. Table 6-4. Percent feeling crowding during different parts of trips (by segment and group). At pa ing areas While fishing Overall At put -in While fishing Ogre Powerboat anglers At take -out While traveling on river Highest crowding percentage in bold. October 2010 e c r e a t t l o tuck k r fL .dJ A an d ons Lower River 34 31. 44 41 32 5 57 Kings as primary 42 53 Middle River Upper River 34 55 47 42 43 68 62 18 3 39 Lower (not kings 13 51 64 Middle (not kings 21 17 24 Page 54 Impacts and tolerances Impacts social or biophysical conditions experienced by users have been a topic of recreation research for at least three decades. In backcountry settings, the focus is typically on river or trail encounters (number of other groups seen per day), camp encounters (number of groups is sight or sound while camping), or camp sharing. In higher density frontcountry settings, the focus shifts to "interference" and "competition" variables, some of which were developed on the Kenai in the 1992 study and repeated in 2009 (Table 6 -5). Table 6 -5. List of impacts measured through the on -site survey. Impact Discourteous behavior Bank anglers Angler proximity Boat interference Fishing competition Put -in waiting time Powerboat anglers only October 2010 Keria Re G S F ndi any okca How often did you see others causing problems such as littering, being aggressive, violating regulations, etc. What was the average distance between you and the next angler? Description How long did you wait today? i ns Response categories Number of incidents reported How often did boats interfere (come too close or create large wakes) with your Number of times fishing today? shoulder to shoulder <3 ft); one rod (6- 10 ft); one car (15 -20 ft); two cars (30- 40 ft); casting distance (60 ft); out of sight. How often did you have trouble finding an 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the time uncrowded place to fish? In minutes Page 55 Reported impacts Angler proximity impact Entanglements Middle River Bank Anglers of courteous incidents Boat interference Angler proximity impact Entanglements October 2010 Ke ar Re atop Stud Table 6 -6. Bank angler reported impacts. of discourteous incidents Fishing competition impact of discourteous incidents Tables 6 -6 through 6 -8 summarize reported impacts (means, medians, and the 25% 75% "typical range The median response represents "50% of the sample reported this number or less," and is a better measure of central tendency than averages because of outliers. These tables provide a general description of conditions; analyses presented later in the chapter show how impacts compare to users' tolerances or how they vary by use level. Mean 2.6 (6 -10 15 -20 ft) 2.6 3.0 25% 0.5 0.5 3.0 1.1 1 Typical range defined as the 25% and 75% responses (interquartile range). s an y tV ton Median 0 2.0 (15 -20 feet 1.0 2.0 0% 3 0 Typical Range 0 to 1 2 to 3 0 to 3 0 to 4 O to 50% 0 to 0 0 to 0 2 to 4 0 to 2 56 Table 6 -7. Drift angler reported impacts. of discourteous incidents VC Boat interference impact Put in impact Middle River of courteous incidents Fishing competition impact Take out impact of discourteous incidents Boat interference impac Put in impact October 2010 Kena e e r or F4-id n and pi cations Mean 0.6 1.3 4.8 2.1 13% 2.8 0.6 1.5 2.4 'Typical range defined as the 25% and 75% responses (interquartile range). Median 1 Typical Range 0 to 1 O to 10 0 to 3.75 0 to 25% 0 to 5 0 o 1 to 2 0 to 5 Page 57 Kenai Recreato Mayor Fincim Table 6 -8. Powerboat angler reported impacts. of discourteous incidents Close calls Fish competition impact October 2010 Take -out waiting time of discourteous incidents Close calls Fish competition impact Take -out waiting time of discourteous incidents Close calls Fish competition impact Pu i Mme Take -out waiting time of discourteous incidents Close calls Fish competition impact Perin r�� Take -out waiting time Mean 0.2 0.01 13% 1.8 0.9 0.2 20% 4.3 0.2 0.04 5 °/O 0.2 0.05 5% 1.1 'Typical range defined as the 25% and 75% responses (interquartile range). Median 0 0% 0 25% 0 0% 0 0 Typical Ranger 0 to 1 0to25% 0 to 5 0 to 0 0 0 to 50% 0 to 5 0 to 1 0 0 to 25% 0 0 0to25% 0 to 3 Peg Tolerances for impacts Kenai ecrear r Findin a, d ations For each impact question, users were asked to identify a tolerance (the amount of impact "you would tolerate before your trip becomes unpleasant on the same scale; they could also cheek "it doesn't matter to me" or "it doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish." Data are useful in several ways: First, the percent who give a number (do not check "it doesn't matter measures "norm prevalence" (the percent who have a norm) and may indicate an impact's importance (Shelby 1981; Whittaker and Shelby 1988; Roggenbuck et al., 1991; Shelby et al., 1996; Vaske et al., 1999). Second, median responses help identify the amount of impact tolerable to 50% of those with an opinion, which stakeholders and agencies may consider when developing standards (a key element in most visitor impact management or capacity frameworks). Frequency distributions identify whether the evaluations represent "no tolerance," "single tolerance," or "multiple tolerance" norms, which help assess the level of agreement about potential standards (Whittaker and Shelby, I988). Third, comparisons of reported impacts and tolerances identify possible problem areas. Figure 6 -1 shows the percent reporting "this impact doesn't matter" or "it doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish." Findings include: Large proportions (100 minus the sum of these percentages; 60 to 90 care about impacts and were able to specify tolerances. Most anglers don't come to the Kenai to "just to catch fish," and other components of the experience matter. When fishing is poor, impacts become relevant even for harvest oriented users. Some impacts appear "less important" than others, such as entanglements and boat interference for bank anglers, and launch waiting time for drift anglers. "It doesn't matter" percentages are similar to those found in the 1992 Kenai study (combined percentages ranged from 8 to 35 depending upon the impact) and several other studies (Vaske et al., 1999). The "doesn't matter" percentages are about evenly split, so "it doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish" is never the full explanation. Angler proximity Bank Fishing competition anglers Entanglements Boat interference Fishing competition Drift Boat interference anglers Launch wait time Fishing competition Powerboat Boat interference anglers Launch wait time 0 °/a RUM Kt oDoesn't matter to Doesn't matter as long as l "m, catching fi 40% 60% 80% 100% of respondents 13% 10% 16% 21% 34% 40% me Figure 6 -1. Percent reporting impacts "do not matter" to them. h October 2010 Page 59 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Kenai Re cation Study e !Mgr nth d i uli ate o s Percent reporting tolerance Figures 6 -2, 6 -3, and 6 -4 provide examples of frequency distributions for tolerances to illustrate "types of norms." Table 6 -9 summarizes generalized norms (medians) for all impacts, as well as providing additional notes about differences between segments or target species. King anglers 0% L. Shoulder One rod One car Two cars Casting Average distance between anglers Figure 6.2. Angler proximity tolerances among bank anglers who fish for different species. Out of sight In Figure 6 -2, angler proximity tolerances for bank anglers that pursue different species show: An example of two different "single tolerance norms" with relatively high agreement about acceptable spacing between anglers. The spacing differs for the two types of fishing. King anglers require more space (most prefer one or t. lengths) silver or red anglers (mn u ire only one rod length). h� two car len�,L.w� than J.� o (most req�,. on o gt. A small proportion (12 to 15 of red and silver anglers will tolerate fishing "shoulder -to- shoulder," compared to 8% for king anglers. Some king anglers require "casting distance" or being "out of sight," but very few red or silver anglers have the same requirement. Data from 1992 suggest red angler tolerances have changed over time. Although the percentage who tolerate shoulder -to- shoulder spacing is similar (8% in 1992 vs. 12% in 2009), 60% of anglers in 1992 required a car length or greater, compared to 34% now. This is consistent with a "product shift," where anglers have learned to accept higher density conditions (possibly displacing more sensitive users). Results suggest the number of anglers that can "fit" along a segment of shore and have a high quality experience. Managers could calculate this number for a land management unit (e.g., a park unit) and use it when designing day use parking or other facilities that access such areas. October 2010 Page 60 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Ke a €i Recreat udy aJo Findings anO ons Percent reporting tolerance F boat ngiers kinks Powerboat anglers not targeting kings 25 50 75 Percent of time it is difficult finding uncrowded place to fish Figure 6-3. Fishing competition tolerances among drift and powerboat anglers. 100 In Figure 6 -3, fishing competition tolerances show: More examples of "single tolerance norms," with general agreement about acceptable impacts. There are some differences among the groups. Drift anglers show more agreement about a single tolerance level (25% of the time) and powerboat anglers targeting kings show the least consensus (with substantial percentages choosing 0, 25 and 50% of the time). Few anglers accept having difficulty finding uncrowded fishing more than 75% of the time. The majority r a tolerance of 25% or less. Data relatively strong agreement for a standard about 25 however, the boat density that exceeds this standard varies by segment (see use impact relationships below). Data from 1992 suggest fishing competition tolerances have not changed much. In Figure 6 -4, launch waiting time tolerances show: Examples of "multiple tolerance norms" with less agreement about a single acceptable level. It is more difficult to set standards for these impacts because different groups have different ideas about what is acceptable. However, a majority will not tolerate waiting longer than 15 minutes, and very few tolerate over 30 minutes. Some drift anglers appear willing to tolerate longer waits at take -outs than put -ins. Waiting time tolerances have changed slightly since 1992. For example, in 1992 only 8% of drift anglers would tolerate waits over 20 minutes compared. to 29% in 2009. This fits with the "product shift" concept, where users have "downgraded" their expectations and tolerances to fit with higher use conditions. October 2010 rage 61 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Line entanglements Drift anglers 1' Boat interference Powerboat anglers Boat interference October 2010 K tl reat Percent reporting tolerance Drift put -in 10 15 20 Launch waiting time (minutes) Figure 6-4. Launch waiting tolerances among drift and powerboat anglers. Table 6 provides median tolerances for several impacts. The median says, "50% will tolerate this amount or less" (and is a better measure of central tendency than an average, which can be influenced by outliers). Results suggest potential standards, but differences by segment or species /season may be important considerations for managers who decide to use these to set capacities for a specific time and place. Table 6 -9. Median tolerances for impacts. Median Fishing competition 25% of the time Small differences by species. 2 per day €nd1 s and Imp cat 30 Comments 0 to 1 1 for red anglers; 0 for other species. Over 30 No segment differences. 25% of the time Small differences by species. Page 62 "Impact problems" 1 e nd [ons Table 6 -10 shows the percent of respondents reporting impacts greater, equal, and less than their tolerances. The supplemental report provides additional detail. Findings include: Small percentages (generally less than 1 S reported impacts greater than their tolerances, and average impact levels were never greater than average tolerances (another potential definition of an "impact problem In general, 2009 impact levels were acceptable to most users. However, reported impacts were often equal to tolerances (22 to 65 indicating little "margin" for increased impact. Combining the "impact tolerance" and "impact tolerance" categories, a majority reported impacts greater than or equal to their tolerances for 7 of the 12 impacts. For these, most users accept what they experienced in 2009, but don't want impacts to worsen. Higher percentages of bank anglers report impacts greater than or equal to their tolerances, 1992 results generally showed similar total percentages greater than or equal to tolerances. However, bank angler findings provided some exceptions. For example, more 1992 Upper River bank anglers reported impacts greater than (33 or equal to tolerances (55 than 2009 (with 10% and 45 respectively). This fits with earlier discussion noting higher bank angler use levels during the second red run in 1992 than in 2009. Table 6 -10. Percent reporting impacts greater than, equal to, or less than tolerances. Impact tolerance (impact problem Impact tolerance (potential problem) (no problem) Angier proximity Entang lements Drift anglers 4 49 Impact standard 37 8 42 40 Boat interference Take -out time 7 36 22 Boat interference Put -in time October 2010 40 50 57 71 57 39 Page 63 Use impact relationships Analyses explored relationships between use measures and several reported impacts (including perceived crowding). Following Cohen (1988) and Vaske (2008), correlations in applied social sciences are considered "small effect" if they are about 0.1, a "moderate effect" about 0.3, and a "strong effect" at or above 0.5. A list of impacts and the most highly correlated use measures are given in Tables 6 -11 to 6- 14. Findings are discussed separately; the supplement provides correlations for other use measures. Table 6-11. Correlations between use levels and reported crowding impacts for bank anglers. Ferry passenger counts RR day parking users Middle River bank anglers Lower River bank anglers Centennial vehicle counts penal Recr e l u ri Overall crowding 55 .52 41 Denotes no statistically significant relationship (p >.05). Angler proximity -.32 -.31 -.22 .26 23 3 Fishing competition Line entanglements .37 .30 40 fs Boat interference Table 6 -11 shows use impact correlations for bank anglers. Findings include: Several impacts are related to use measures at moderate to strong levels, showing that higher use levels produce higher reported impacts or perceived crowding among bank anglers. This is true for many but not all social impacts in recreation settings, so verification is important. in general, the strongest relationships are between use and perceived crowding (correlations between .24 and .55). Bank angler use level measures are "imperfect" because they count people or vehicles at specific access points, which does not always account for variation in where they go in a segment. Vehicle counts at major access points are helpful for describing relative use levels. The weakest use impact relationship is for boat interference, which is probably mediated by boater behavior (they may spread out through a segment), and therefore less correlated with boat numbers. Discourteous behavior was not related to use measures on any segment (not shown). October 2010 Page 64 Kenai Rec reat on S d Major Fjndings an cat ons Table 6-12. Correlations between use levels and reported crowding impacts for drift anglers. Ferry passenger counts Sanctuary counts Jim's Landing trailer counts Bing's trailer counts Pillars boat trailers Total guided boats fishing Overall crowding .21 .34 .36 30 54 .37 Denotes no statistically significant relationship (p >.05). Boat Fishing Courteous interference competition behavior .27 .12 20 .27 23 16 .21 15 .54 Table 6 -12 shows use impact correlations for drift anglers. Findings include: Perceived crowding shows moderate to strong correlations with use. Other impacts are less strongly related. Weaker relationships may be due to more coarse use measures on certain segments or specific attributes of drift trips (e.g., Lower River drift trips were usually on lower use "drift -only Mondays Reports of discourteous behavior were not related to use (not shown), but courteous behavior was positively related (more use more courteous behavior). The relationship was particularly strong for the Middle River. Higher use may encourage people to "be nicer" to offset "friction" or put more people in close contact, affording more chances for courteous interactions. Notably, courteous behavior incidents outnumber discourteous behavior by a substantial margin (a finding that persists across segments and types of anglers). Use perceived crowding relationships are stronger for measures of boating use (e.g., launches) as opposed to measures of bank use (e.g., Ferry passenger counts). Boaters feel crowded from other boaters rather than bank users. Interestingly, trailer counts at Pillars showed a higher correlation than actual boat counts for the Lower River. The Pillars trailer count might effectively reflect the most crowded fishing areas (which are often downstream of that launch). Put -in waiting time was not significantly correlated with use levels (not shown), but take -out time was correlated with the ADF &G boat counts on the Lower River at x-0.41 (p <.001). October 2010 Page 65 e a Recreation Study o M JOr n and ki at ions Table 6.13. Correlations between use levels and reported crowding impacts for powerboat anglers. Overall Boat Fishing Putin Take -out Discourteous crowding interference competition 56 .54 .23 Pillars trailer counts as ADF &G boat counts Lower River Centennial trailer counts Total boats Centennial trailer counts Bings trailer counts .68 .25 Denotes no statistically significant relationship (p >.05). 56 .50 37 .69 time .32 .22 59 63 .45 time behavior .20 .60 68 24 Table 6 -14 shows use impact correlations for powerboat anglers targeting kings and those targeting other species. Findings include: O Perceived crowding shows moderate to strong correlations with use on all three segments, while other impacts are less strongly related. "Close calls" between boats were related only to use levels measured by Pillars trailers (r =.24). The number of close calls reported was very low, but the few that were reported tended to occur during higher use levels (1% reported any before July; 11% reported any in July). As with drift anglers, courteous behavior incidents were related to use levels (not shown) as measured. by Pillars trailer counts (.22) and Centennial trailer counts (.35), but not ADF &G boat counts. Powerboat launch congestion on the Lower River appears to be higher on days with at least medium use (over 200 boats counted.) vs. lower use (under 200); average put -in times increase from 2.7 to 6.3 minutes, and average take -out tunes increase from 2.7 to 4.8 minutes. These waiting times are still low compared to median tolerances about 15 minutes. There was little launch congestion on the Lower River in 2009 compared to some previous years (see Chapter 2). In general, different use measures were highly correlated. The correlations between per day Pillars trailer counts and peak ADF &G boat counts were 0.68. Pillars trailer counts are a reasonable indicators of use levels (R —.44) using the following formula (most accurate when boat counts are between about 100 and 200): Counts on the river 43 2.03 x (the count of Pillars trailers) October 2010 Page 66 Two car lengths One car length One rod length Shoulder to shoulder Kenai Average distance between anglers Figure 6- 5 shows how use affects angler proximity and number of line entanglements per day for bank anglers on the Upper River. These curves show how conditions change as use increases, and allow stakeholders and managers to estimate the use level at which average impacts exceed tolerances. For angler proximity, at over 1,000 Ferry anglers per day, the distance between anglers has decreased to less than one rod length (the median tolerance for red anglers). For entanglements, use levels as low as 400 ferry passengers per day produce more entanglements than the median tolerance (1 per day), and entanglements increase dramatically (to 6 7 per day) over 1,000. in 2009, these higher use levels occurred during the peak of the first red run but not during the second. Average eritanglemEnts �o D moo ro° moo N o Number of Ferry passengers per day Figure 6 -5. Use vs. impact relationships for angler proximity and line entanglements for Upper River bank anglers. Figure 6 -6 (next page) shows how use affects perceived crowding among Upper River bank anglers. Using this example to apply the `rule of thumb" capacity categories, use levels of about 800 to 1,000 ferry passengers per day produce crowding levels in the "over capacity" range, and use levels over 1,000 are "greatly over capacity." This is consistent with reported angler proximities (which begin to exceed tolerances at those use levels). October 2010 Page 67 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 100% 80° /n 60% 40% 20% reporting crowding reporting crowding Greatly over capacity Over capacity High normal Low norm No crowding 0% LSO o O Lor Fnd n and F Number of Ferry passengers per day Figure 6 -6. Use vs. percent reporting crowding for Upper River bank anglers. Figure 6 -7 shows how use affects perceived crowding and fishing competition among Upper River drift anglers. Applying the "rule of thumb" capacity categories, use levels over 40 Sportsman launches per day produce crowding levels in the "over capacity" range. In 2009, use did exceed 60 launches enough to create "greatly over capacity" levels. The percents of time anglers had difficulty finding an uncrowded place to fish follow perceived crowding levels. Median tolerance for this impact was about 25 percent of the time, which occurred at about 40 boats per day the same use level that is "over capacity" by the perceived crowding "rule of thumb." Percent feeling crowding Percent cilfficuEty finding uncrowded place to f sh ,.,n nsO 60 0 f.O �y°r Number of launches per day (Sportsman's) Mean pe €cent 6 0 O� 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 6.7. Use vs, crowding and fishing competition for Upper River drift anglers, October 2010 Page 68 Figure 6 -8 shows how use affects perceived crowding among Lower River king powerboat anglers. Applying the "rule of thumb" capacity categories, at boat counts below 150 crowding is low. At about 150, crowding levels reach "over capacity," remaining there through the highest use levels in 2009 (about 350 boats). Counts on high use days in other years have reached 450 to 500 boats, and might produce higher crowding ratings (this study can't confirm that). Figure 6 -9 shows how use affects fishing competition and boat interference. Median competition tolerances are exceeded above 210 to 240 boats, while boat interference impacts were close to tolerances throughout the 2009 season. 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% R c w Study Major Pi iap`'pc reporting crowding Over capacity 0 0 0 0 O A O 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 y0 0 O q w 1 6 0. °a C O g0 NI.' ^o o rt> 1 o b o o 5,s rb o o S o o ty o ADF &G boat count on Lower River Figure 6 -8. Use vs. percent feeling crowded for powerboat anglers on the Lower River, 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Mean percent Median tolerance (both indicators) difficuity fiundiat, bincr wded p c tc. ti. Percent of time boats interfered with ability to fish 0% I 1 S O 0 0 0 0 i0 y0 $0 D e ,1O 0 0 qp 0 4 ,�0 y 0 w o �o wo a o 0 0 O �O 00 0 0 O O O k O 0 O O O� Ni �O t� y 1 yes 3 5 a� ADF &G boat count on Lower River Figure 6 -9. Use vs. percent feeling crowded for powerboat anglers on the Lower River. October 2010 Page 69 Crowding and Satisfaction Kenai ecreat o Ir_i5Aarld np cat ons Taken together, use impact and tolerance information can help managers and stakeholders assess which use levels produce unacceptable conditions. Although relationships between use and impacts vary, and tolerances for impacts are sometimes diverse, planning efforts offer opportunities to consider the choices and state which conditions are acceptable. These choices then can be integrated with, and help choose between, management actions that address impacts that exceed standards (and may include reducing or redistributing use). If the goal is to manage for high quality opportunities, it is critical to define what that means and then implement actions that will achieve those conditions. Managers unwilling to define "acceptable," or act to maintain them, are probably managing for other goals than high quality opportunities (e.g., to maximize quantity of use rather than quality). Other relationships among on -site survey variables Visitor satisfaction has frequently been measured in recreation settings (Heberlein Vaske 1977; Kuss, et al., 1990). However, satisfaction is not a particularly useful measure for assessing recreation experience quality. I.n addition, satisfaction levels are typically quite high, although consumptive users such as hunters and anglers consistently show lower satisfaction compared to non consumptive users such as hikers and rafters (Vaske, et al., 1982; Vaske et al., 2009). For many well- documented reasons, satisfaction is usually weakly or unrelated to use, crowding, or impact measures, and it is usually too general a variable to evaluate conditions managers might actually influence (Shelby Heberlein, 1986). Having noted these limitations, general satisfaction ratings are often requested by managing agencies, and they are included in this study for completeness. On a five point scale from "very unsatisfied" to "very satisfied," 78% of bank anglers, 91% of drift anglers, 81% of powerboat anglers, and 91% of non anglers reported they were satisfied or very satisfied with their trips, and averages for most group /segment combinations were about 4.0 to 4.2. Consistent with previous research, non anglers averaged higher satisfaction (4.6), although they were joined by driftboat anglers on the Upper River at 4.7 and powerboat anglers on the Middle River at 4,6. Both groups have higher catch rates associated with trout/Dolly fisheries, which may be another factor in their higher ratings than other consumptive users. The relationship between satisfaction and crowding was statistically significant and in the predicted direction (more crowding less satisfaction) for a few group /segment situations, but was always weak (as predicted by the literature). For bank anglers, the satisfaction crowding correlation ranged from -.07 to -.15; for drift anglers it was significant only on the Middle River -.13); for powerboat anglers it was significant only for Lower River anglers not targeting kings -.27). Note that the number of fish caught was also weakly related to satisfaction (.13 to .14 for different groups); crowding and the number of fish hooked have roughly the same effect on satisfaction ratings. What impacts influence crowding? Table 6 -4 provides correlations between perceived crowding and reported impacts; results indicate which impacts affect experiences most. Findings include: Over three quarters (55 of 72) of the group /segment situations showed statistically significant relationships (p <.05) and all significant ones were in the predicted direction (more impact greater crowding). Some but not all impacts measured clearly influence crowding ratings, as predicted in the literature (Vaske et al., 2002). Significant correlations ranged from small (about 0.1) to strong (0.5), with the latter deserving greater management attention. Strong correlations include fishing competition among bank anglers on the October 2010 Page 70 Table 6 -14. Correlations between perceived crowding and reported impacts. Angler proximity Discourteous behavior Boat interference impact Drift anglers Discourteous behavior Courteous behavior Take out time Powerboat anglers e Discourteous behavior Courteous behavior Take out time Octob er 2010 Kenai Recreation 900 or lO n and on All anglers -.33 .24 .14 .13 .18 .24 All anglers .40 Lower River -.29 .34 .36 .31 Lower and Middle River, fishing competition among drift anglers on the Lower and Upper River, and boat interference, fishing competition, and launch waiting times among powerboat anglers on the Lower River (outside the king season). Middle River .33 Upper River -.32 .13 .23 17 .13 30 .22 .59 .18 .19 Kings as Lower Middle primary not kings not kings Additional regression analysis shows influences on crowding for all impacts taken together (using stepwise removal of non significant impacts). Results are given in Table 6 -15. Findings are similar to the bivariate correlations in Table 6 -16, but account for overlapping variance and provide an "effect size" (R Models for different groups explain about one third of the variance in perceived crowding, a reasonably strong effect for social science data. Additional variance may be related to anglers' tolerances, expectations, or preferences. When considered together, impacts have small to medium effects on crowding, so there is not just one kind of impact that makes people feel crowded. Page 71 Table 6 -15. Relationships between crowding and reported impacts. Bank anglers Powerboat anglers targeting kings Kena. R creation Study Locyngs ao0 Impijcatiqns .31 Fishing competition (.31) Angler proximity -.20) Entanglements (.16) Discourteous behavior (.13) Put -in time (.28) Take -out time (.20) .32 Boat interference (.18) Discourteous behavior (.18) Courteous behavior -.13) Courteous behavior Boat interference Fishing competition October 2010 Page 72 For all users 7. Issue Importance This chapter presents information from the follow -up survey for users, landowners, and guides about which issues are more important. Respondents were asked to rate 24 issues on a 5-point importance scale from not at all important" to "extremely important." The list of issues was developed from focus groups and reviewed by agencies; respondents could also suggest other issues (see supplemental report for verbatim responses). Figures 7 -1 ranks issues for all users by average importance ratings (and shows percent very and extremely important). Results illustrate major findings, but simplify differences between user groups (discussed in greater detail below). Percent "very" and "extremely" important 0% 25% 50% 75% Litter and human waste Discourteous behavior Bank trampling Boating safety Recreation impacts on wildlife Powerboat effects on erosion Bank angler access Hydrocarbon pollution Water clarity turbidity Facilities to handle use Bank anglers in red seasons Bear human interactions Guided /unguided conflict Boats Lower River in July Motorized/non-motorized conflict Boats Upper River during reds Landowner angler conflict Boats Niiddie River 2nd reds Boats Upper River after reds Boats Middle River after 2nd reds Boats Lower River other mos. Visual docks and boardwalks l Visual homes and buildings Scenic rafting Upper River Not at all Average importance rating (bottom scale) Percent "very" or 'extremely important" (bars and top scale) Slightly Moderately Very Average importance rating Figure 7 -1. Average importance ratings and percent "very" or "extremely important" for management issues among all users. 100% Extremely Findings include: Many issues are important to majorities of users. For example, even lower -rated issues (e.g., visual impacts of docks and boardwalks, with a mean of 2.9) had one -third of all users reporting the issue was "very" or "extremely important" Over 70% rate issues such as boating safety "very" or "extremely important." Issues related to physical or biological conditions tend to be among the most important. Six of the top ten issues were litter and human waste, bank trampling, recreation impacts on wildlife, powerboat October 2010 Page 73 K it R. creation u Majo¢ and pJ Differences between user groups effects on erosion, hydrocarbon pollution, and water clarity/ turbidity. The 1992 study showed similar findings, emphasizing that a healthy ecosystem is a starting point for high quality recreation experiences. Habitat protection and restoration efforts over the past two decades have improved habitat in several previously impacted areas. The continued high importance ratings for these bio- physical impact issues suggest the public is still concerned about those impacts, and may support even greater management attention. Two user behavior issues, discourteous incidents and boating safety, were also near the top of the list, confirming that Kenai users care about social aspects of their experiences on the river. Two facility infrastructure issues, the amount of river access for bank anglers and the amount of facilities to handle the volume of use, were also ranked in the "top ten." Despite an extensive array of local, state, and federal facilities along the river, many users appear interested in improvements or increased bank access. Except for safety and discourteous behavior, conflicts between guided and unguided users, motorized and non motorized users, and landowners and anglers were not rated as highly as several biophysical impacts, but were generally at the top of the `experiential" issues. The lowest importance issues were visual impacts from development and scenic rafting use on the Upper River. The numbers of boats or users on specific segments were generally ranked lower. However, results are confounded because not all respondents use or care about every segment; for the respondents who actually use a segment, ratings are invariably higher. The supplemental report provides further "break -outs" for users from different segments. Overall, results for all users show the relative importance of overuse issues, suggesting greater concern about bank angling use in red salmon season, powerboats on the Lower River in July, and boating use on the Upper River during red runs. Results are broadly consistent with segments /seasons that have higher use and crowding. Table 7 -1 provides similar information for all users, landowners, and the three major angler groups. Results show some differences, including: Landowners were similar to powerboat anglers in their issue ratings, not surprising given that about three quarters of landowners use powerboats on the Lower or Middle River. Landowners also ranked bank angler numbers during red seasons, trespass conflicts, guided /unguided conflicts, and boat numbers on the Lower River in July higher than did users. Among the three angler groups, bank anglers were predictably more concerned about the amount of bank angler access and the number of bank anglers in red season. They were less concerned than powerboat anglers about boating safety, guided /unguided use conflicts, and the number of powerboats on the Lower River. Drift anglers ranked many issues slightly higher than other groups, with notably higher ratings for the number of boats on the Upper River (during and after red season) and motor /non -motor conflicts. Powerboat anglers tended to rank many issues slightly lower than other groups. They were less concerned with hydrocarbon pollution and wake erosion, two issues which might restrict equipment or behavior. However, they showed higher concern for the boating use levels on the Lower River in July and guided/unguided use issues. October 2010 Page 74 rye °or Ffndirk s ?nth t ors Table 7 -1. Average importance ratings for management issues: all users, landowners, and major user groups. Discourteous behavior 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.1 Boating safety 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.0 4.2 6.8 .001 Bank power Powerboat effects on erosion 3.9 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.5 13.2 .001 Power from others 3.8 3.6 I 3.8 3.9 3.5 6.5 .002 Power from others Hydrocarbon pollution Facilities to handle use 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.8 4.8 .009 Daft power 3.5 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.2 8.3 .001 Power tram others Bear human interactions Boats Lower River in July Boats Upper River during reds 3.2 3.0 1 3.1 3.5 2.8 13.6 ,001 All three different Boats Middle River 2 reds 3.1 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.0 Boats Middle River after 2nd reds 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.0 Visual docks and boardwalks 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.7 2.8 Scenic rafting Upper River 2.5 2.4 1 2.4 2.6 2.3 3.6 .029 Drift- power /Based on Schen tests at p <.05 among the three main usergro October 2010 Ali Land users owners 3.4 4.2 1 3.2 3.4 3.7 5.9 .003 Bank power Ps Bank Drift Power F p Different groups Page 75 For guides Table 7 -2 provides similar information for guides, including differences between drift and powerboat guides, which were also compared to drift and powerboat users (not shown here; see supplement). Table 7 2. Average importance ratings for management issues among guides. All guides Drift guides Powerboat guides t p Discourteous behavior 4.1 4.4 4.0 2.2 .02 Boating safety 4.6 4.8 4.5 2.3 .018 Powerboat effects on erosion 3.4 4.2 3.1 5.2 .001 Hydrocarbon pollution 3.6 4.2 3.4 3.9 .001 Facilities to handle use 4.2 4.1 4.2 Bear human interactions 3.2 3.9 2.9 4.6 .001 e Boats Lower River in July 3.3 3.7 3.2 2.5 .013 Boats Upper River during reds 2.8 1 3.7 2.3 6.3 .001 Boats Middle River 2 reds 2.7 I 3.4 2.5 4.5 .001 Boats Middle River after 2nd reds 2.8 3.4 2.5 4.2 .001 Bob Visual docks and boardwalks 2.9 3.1 2.8 d Scenic rafting Upper River 2.1 2.3 2.0 October 2010 t i ecr t dings and 1 [3 ns P age 76 Ken a R.e re i n Study e Majkr rindeus and p Uc a1on Findings include: Drift guides rated 17 of the 24 issues higher than powerboat guides. The only issue powerboat guides ranked higher was bank angler access. Even with these differences, the rank order for the two guide groups was similar (and to their user counterparts). The few notable differences include: a Boating safety was rated higher for both guide groups compared to users. This makes sense given liability concerns. o Facilities to handle use were rated higher for guides than users; this fits with guide interest in efficient trips (e.g., avoiding launch congestion). o Water clarity was rated considerably lower by powerboat guides. This issue has received considerable attention in 2009-10 in response to KWF and DEC turbidity studies, and might affect powerboat use. n Powerboat guides rated Upper River use issues much lower than users; few powerboat guides use this segment. n Both types of guides rated visual impact issues slightly higher than users. This may reflect interest in marketing the Kenai's undeveloped setting. If one arrays importance scores for any given issue, drift guides are generally highest, followed by drift users, powerboat users, and powerboat guides. A survey of Kodiak Island trail users found a similar pattern regarding motorized /non- motorized issues; motor and non -motor enthusiasts stakeholders (some of whom were guides) held stronger views than "average users" in their counterpart groups (Whittaker 2004). October 2010 Page 77 This chapter provides information from the fall ow -rev survey about how people respond to crowded situations. The questions asked if respondents ever feel crowded on the river, then provided a check list of potential responses for those who had. The question was also asked in the 1992 study. Note: This question refers to crowding in general on users' trips, and is different from the on -site questions that asked about crowding on a specific trip. General crowding measure Figure 8 -1 shows the percent that "sometimes fee] crowded" vs. those who "never feel crowded" or "enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere." Findings include: Almost three- quarters of 2009 users and guides feel crowded some of the time. However, percent feeling crowded is lower than in 1992. One possible explanation is that 2009 had lower use levels on the Lower River during kings and on the entire river during the second run of reds. Another explanation is that current users are more tolerant of higher use and impacts that are part of the new experience" (a so-called "product shift"). The percentage of uses responding "1 enjoy crowds" has tripled since 1992 (from 4% to 13 additional support for the product shift explanation. O Differences between groups were generally small. However, fewer non anglers and more landowners felt crowded, and drift guides were more likely to feel crowded than powerboat guides. All users 1992 All guides 1992 All users 2009 All guides 2009 Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Non- anglers Landowners ation Study or Findin n ns Drift guides Power guides 100% 80% 8e Responding to Crowding 1 ru�.vtr reel ciowcle 27% I enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere 24% 24% 25% 32% 16% 74% 85% 70% 72% 75% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% enjoy crowds/don't feel crowded feel crowded sometimes Figure 8 -1. Percent of different groups that enjoy crowds, don't feel crowded, and feel crowded sometimes. October 2010 Page 78 tY p�[� gp^ S i g o y n g g #n x :rw ki,�+ yk 'per 3"'dE,�i��;s q 4E:FdB�gS'��L.�S.f 8i.Ttl din! �>s 3E'LS�ffi<8ons Responses to crowding For those who felt crowded, Figure 8 -2 shows user responses to crowding in 1992 and 2009. Findings include: The pattern of "coping" responses is similar in both years, indicating some stability in how people react. The most popular ways to deal with crowding are to 1) avoid other users in the same area, 2) plan to take trips mid -week, 3) plan a trip at a different time of day, or 4) plan a trip for a different segment. These responses all redistribute use to lower use times and places, but they also reduce the diversity of experiences in the system (e.g., weekdays start to look more like weekends). Higher proportions of 1992 users reported these top responses. Fewer 2009 users report proactively coping with crowding, consistent with the "product shift" hypothesis. Some report becoming more tolerant of the higher use /higher impact situation, while others may have become displaced. The proportion who become dissatisfied is similar, but fewer 2009 users report "resigning themselves to a new more crowded experience" (32% to 23 This runs counter to the "product shift" hypothesis, unless current users don't recognize they have adapted to the higher use /impact situation. Nearly one quarter of current users report taking trips less frequently, a response not offered in 1992. This is an estimate of "partially displaced" users. The study cannot estimate "fully displaced" users because they would not go to the river at all (and can't become part of the sample). Taking trips in the off season, using another river, or engaging in another type of recreation are less common responses to crowding. Try to avoid others (in same area) Plan: same segment, middle of week Plan: same segment, new time of day Plan: other segments Go less frequently Resign to crowded experience Become dissatisfied Plan: other segments day of week Plan: same segment, off season Go to another river Do other types of recreation Plan: other segments off season etkot 0 60% 39% 32% 22% 23% 1% 18% 12% 40% 20% 1992 20% 40% 2009 60% Figure 8 -2. Among those who felt crowded, percent checking coping responses (all users). October 2010 Page 79 Table 8 -1 provides "responses to crowding" for different user groups. Findings include: Powerboat anglers are less likely to avoid others in the same area, supporting the idea (in Chapter 5) that some powerboat anglers may even seek out others (because boat concentrations indicate fishing success). Powerboat anglers are much more likely to take trips at a different time of day, a common unguided user strategy on the Lower River during July king season. Guide hours constrain guided users, although they can go later in the day, which tends to have lower use. Powerboat anglers are slightly more likely to become resigned to a higher density experience. Drift anglers are slightly more likely to go to another river than other anglers (with the drift -only Kasilof listed most often). Non- anglers generally engage in fewer coping responses, and lower percentages report feeling crowded; these users appear less sensitive to high use levels. Landowners are generally similar to powerboat anglers, but they are less likely to go to another segment (probably because they access the river from their residence). Table 8 -1. Among those who felt crowded, percent checking different coping responses (different groups). Plan: other segments ft Resign to crowded experience Plan: other segments day of week Go to another river 0.1 Kena Rerreation St Plan: other segments off season October 2010 All users R nd -nps ktd tplicato s Bank Drift Powerboat Non- Land anglers anglers anglers anglers owners Plan: same segment, middle of week 32 33 33 31 20 36 28 1 29 3 26 22 15 23 23 22 27 16 17 16 13 17 20 13 15 12 10 17 11 7 5 5 7 4 4 4 Figure 8 -3 provides "responses to crowding" for drift and powerboat guides. Findings include: Guides are about twice as likely as users to "resign themselves" to crowded experiences as users (52% vs. 23 Guides who want to work regularly must take trips even when it's crowded, consistent with a product shift. e Drift guides reported more coping responses, with large percentages reporting they try to avoid others on the same segment (77 and become resigned to the new experience (66 They were also more likely to report dissatisfaction due to crowding (28% vs. 8 In general, drift guides appear more sensitive to crowding and more likely to actively cope with it. Powerboat guides are less likely to avoid others or go to other segments. Their trips are more focused on fishing success for kings and silvers, they target specific times and places, and they are less willing to fish other times and places just to avoid crowding. No guides reported willingness to go to another river in response to crowding (not shown). Page 80 r e at €o tudL a nc and Opiications Guides in 2009 are less likely to utilize several coping responses compared. to 1992. For example, 60% of all guides in 1992 reported avoiding others in the same area compared to 48% in 2009. This is consistent with a product shift. Resign to crowded experience Try to avoid others (in same area) Plan: other segments Plan: same segment, new time of day Plan: same segment, middle of week Become dissatisfied Plan: other segments day of week Plan: same segment, off season Plan: other segments off season Go Tess frequently Do other types of recreation Plan: other segments off season ekta 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% B0% 100% Drift guides Powerboat guides Figure 8 -3. Percent of guides checking different responses to crowding (among those who felt crowded). October 2010 Page 81 Bank anglers Drift anglers Power anglers Non- anglers Landowners Drift guides Power guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Power anglers Non anglers Landowners Drift guides Power guides 100% Kenai Recreation Study aigiEndjngs c 11 atIot 9. Changing Conditions, Past Use, and Displacement This chapter provides information from the follow -up survey about how the river may have changed in recent years. The survey asked respondents to rate the overall quality of trips and management, whether they have reduced or stopped use of certain segments and seasons, and why. Overall trip quality and management Figure 9 -1 shows reported changes in the quality of trips and agency management over the years (percent "stayed the sane" are not shown). Findings include: For trip quality, greater percentages of most groups report decline rather than improvement (often more than twice as many). For landowners, who generally have used the river for more years, the ratio of decline to improvement is 3 to 1. Results suggest that the Kenai's "trip quality reputation" is trending downward. Bank anglers are the only group with more respondents reporting improvement than decline. One explanation is that many bank anglers have seen lower use levels during recent red salmon seasons as the personal use fishery has provided an alternative. A second is that the fishing platform system has provided many better places to fish (even though other bank angling areas have been closed). Non anglers were evenly divided, with most reporting quality had "stayed the same" (100 the sum of improvement decline). For quality of agency management, most groups reported more improvement than decline. Even though trip quality may be trending downward, many respondents credit agency management for trying to address problems. Non anglers and bank anglers were most likely to feel this way; expanded facilities (especially boardwalks for bank anglers) and facility improvements are two of several possible explanations. Val MOM JAW 1 MEM 24% Quality of trips 59% Quality of management 50% 48% 45% 40% 34% 22% 21% 25% 15% 4 6% 80% 60% 40% 20% 1% 22% 27% 17% 9% 27% 29% 26% 36% 32% 36% 30% 43% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Substantially or slightly declined Slightly or substantially improved Figure 9.1. Percent reporting improvement or decline in trip and management quality. October 2010 Page 82 Bank anglers Drift anglers Power anglers Non- anglers Landowners Drift guides Power guides All users 2009 All users 1992 Ke ec 0% The two groups that showed more management decline than improvement were powerboat guides and landowners, who generally have longer experience on the river. These groups are also more likely to use powerboats on the Lower River for kings, probably the situation with the greatest management challenges (with several crowding and fishery issues). As with trip quality, the "quality of management" question was intentionally general; responses could refer to a wide variety of local, state, or federal programs or facilities. Agencies received credit for their efforts despite the challenges of a complex river, but complacency is not warranted because 15 to 40% of different groups still report a decline in management. Past use and displacement Respondents were asked if they have reduced or stopped visiting at some times {Figure 9 -2 and Table 9- 1). The question was also asked in 1992 (but without the "reduced" option), .Displacement may technically only apply to users that have completely stopped using a resource, but reported reduced use is a related concept essentially a kind of "temporary displacement" and remains a useful indicator of whether users are changing their visitation due to changing conditions. Findings include: About one -third of all users have reduced or stopped using segments of the river. Taken together with trip quality findings, substantial numbers of users perceive a downward trend and have adjusted their behavior by "within site" displacement. A majority of landowners report displacement, with about half reducing their use and half no longer using some segments. Landowners generally have a longer history by which to evaluate trends. They are also older and more likely to be retired, so they may be more willing to change their use when conditions are less than optimal. Guides were slightly less likely to report displacement, which makes sense given their dependency on trips for income. 10% Study aj Ei cPras and rn 'cat10 s 20% 30% 40% Reduced Stopped 5O% 60% 70% that have reduced or stopped using some segments /months Figure 9 -2. Percent of groups who have reduced or stopped visiting segments of the river. October 2010 Page 83 cation Study. MM or Find d jcat ons Table 9-1. Percent reporting different reasons for reducinglstopping use on different segments. Respondents who reported reducing or stopping use were asked to check the segments and reasons. The percentages for each segment are given in Table 9 -2 (next page), with percentages greater than 20% in bold. Findings include: The most important reasons for displacement are crowding related (e.g., too many people, boats, guide boats, powerboats, or discourteous behavior), although perceived decline in fishing success is also an issue on some segments for some groups. In general, the segments with more displacement are the Lower and Upper River. On the lower river the number of people and boats are more often mentioned; on the Upper River the number of people is more frequently mentioned. Landowners are much more likely to report many reasons, and most of their displacement has been from the Lower River. Note: Few landowners were from the Upper River. Guides were more likely to report displacement from the Lower River, but they cite many of the same crowding related reasons as users; 28% even cite "too many guide boats." Guides were more likely to cite "decline in fishing success" as a reason for displacement (especially on the Lower River where it tied with "too many boats" for the top reason). Additional analysis of users reporting displacement suggests that slightly more were drift and powerboat anglers and slightly less were bank anglers. Respondents were also asked to check the months in which they stopped or reduced their use. The percentages for each segment are given in Table 9 -3 (next page), with percentages greater than 20% in bold.. Findings include: The Lower River in July is the segment month combination with the highest amount of displacement, although substantial numbers also identified June on the Lower River too. Displacement is substantial on the Middle River in July for many users and landowners, but guides were more likely to be displaced from the Middle River in August or September. For users, there has been some displacement from the Upper River in June, July, and August. Relatively few guides or landowners report displacement from the Upper River. October 2010 Page 84 All users 1993 Bank Drift Power Non- anglers Land- owners All guides Drift guides Power guides No same segments and seasons 64 78 69 61 57 70 36 75 72 76 Yes reduced some use 27 24 27 30 25 37 19 21 19 22 Yes stopped some use 9 7 12 12 5 27 6 8 5 cation Study. MM or Find d jcat ons Table 9-1. Percent reporting different reasons for reducinglstopping use on different segments. Respondents who reported reducing or stopping use were asked to check the segments and reasons. The percentages for each segment are given in Table 9 -2 (next page), with percentages greater than 20% in bold. Findings include: The most important reasons for displacement are crowding related (e.g., too many people, boats, guide boats, powerboats, or discourteous behavior), although perceived decline in fishing success is also an issue on some segments for some groups. In general, the segments with more displacement are the Lower and Upper River. On the lower river the number of people and boats are more often mentioned; on the Upper River the number of people is more frequently mentioned. Landowners are much more likely to report many reasons, and most of their displacement has been from the Lower River. Note: Few landowners were from the Upper River. Guides were more likely to report displacement from the Lower River, but they cite many of the same crowding related reasons as users; 28% even cite "too many guide boats." Guides were more likely to cite "decline in fishing success" as a reason for displacement (especially on the Lower River where it tied with "too many boats" for the top reason). Additional analysis of users reporting displacement suggests that slightly more were drift and powerboat anglers and slightly less were bank anglers. Respondents were also asked to check the months in which they stopped or reduced their use. The percentages for each segment are given in Table 9 -3 (next page), with percentages greater than 20% in bold.. Findings include: The Lower River in July is the segment month combination with the highest amount of displacement, although substantial numbers also identified June on the Lower River too. Displacement is substantial on the Middle River in July for many users and landowners, but guides were more likely to be displaced from the Middle River in August or September. For users, there has been some displacement from the Upper River in June, July, and August. Relatively few guides or landowners report displacement from the Upper River. October 2010 Page 84 `31. Too many people .1.,er. .1.1n Table 9-2. Percent reporting different reasons for reducing/stopping use on different segments. Too many guide boats Too much discourteous behavior Decline in fishing success My pariners consider it too crowded 18 12 16 11 Too many unguided boats Prefer fishing in other locations Now I fish from a boat 1 no longer use a boat Percentages higher than 20% in bold. June July A ugust September October 2010 Kenai Recreation Stucty ,zigior FirlOim and implications 53 7 i• Users n=283 45 33 45 37 45 25 22 28 31 20 21 39 it 1 24 17 16 44 S" 15 -*a( 9 6 33 10 6 7 2 Users n=283 Lower Middle Upper 33 10 5 1 11 28 20 59 17 11 9 33 9 22 9 Guides n=46 Landowners n=121 24 15 62 25 Guides n=46 Lower Middle Upper 11 4 70 27 7 13 2 55 17 6 28 7 23 12 )11,14,v 2 4 4 18 15 15 20 7 4 Xtia M AO:ft' it"' 13 4 3 1 4;:eit 0.1,•••= 41% ••d- 2 0 7 Table 9-1 Percent reporting different months when they reduced/stopped use on different segments. Landowners n=121 Lower Middle Upper t4 78 28 11 20 13 11 12 9 16 Page 8 Kona R Study lAjor,Finjirls rnp� 10. General Management Strategies This chapter provides information from the follow -up survey about general management strategies that might he used to address use and visitor impacts on the Kenai. Respondents were asked about 11 potential strategies (listed below), on a 5-point scale from "strongly support" to "strongly oppose, with "neutral" and "don't know" options. Develop new facilities (such as launches, day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume of use. Expand or improve existing facilities to handle the volume of use. Develop more access to less -used sections of river to help redistribute use. Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel /paved trails) to reduce impacts from use. Boater safety education programs. "Etiquette" education to address social impacts. Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits in "thru lanes "leave no trace" education to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss). Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss). Limit use through permit reservation systems. Zoning regulations to separate conflicting users (boat vs. bank anglers, motorized vs. non motorized). User opinions toward general management strategies Figure 10 -1 shows results for all users, ordered by average scores. Findings include: a There is majority support for all but two general strategies, suggesting broad interest in a diverse set of management approaches. The strongest support was for education approaches and strategies that address biophysical impact issues. It is common to find greater support for "soft" education compared to "hard" regulation approaches to environmental problems, particularly in recreation settings. The greater interest in Leave no trace education Bio impact regulations Harden high use areas Etiquette education social impacts Expand /improve facilities to handle use Boating safety regulations Increase law enforcement and patrols Boater safety education programs New facilities More access to less used areas Zoning to separate conflicting uses Limit use via reservations Tittfg 36% 18% 20% ons 53% y 27% 38% 83% 74% 76% 71% 75% 69% 67% 59% 66% 68% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly and slightly oppose slightly and strongly support Figure 10 -1. Percent support or oppose general management strategies for all users. Octobef 2010 Page 86 Kena Rect a ?or Fin in nd j tons addressing biophysical impacts fits with issue priorities presented in Chapter 7. Slightly smaller proportions of users had opinions about education /regulation strategies for addressing boating safety, which makes sense because many bank anglers may not care about this issue. Among the "majority support" strategies, the only two with substantial (18 to 20 opposition were new facilities or new access to less used areas. These respondents may be concerned that such development will attract greater use and exacerbate existing problems. Users were divided over use of zoning regulations to separate conflicting uses, and a majority opposed limiting use through permits or reservation systems. Differences between user groups The three angling groups were compared by average scores. Important differences are described below; specific results are provided in the supplement: Powerboat anglers showed less support for boating safety and zoning regulations, either of which could change how powerboat anglers currently use the river. For safety regulations, 50% support and 18% oppose the strategy, and for zoning regulations, 51% oppose and 21% support. Powerboat anglers were less supportive of "minimum impact" education to address biophysical impacts, but still showed majority support. Drift anglers were less supportive for developing new facilities, developing access to less --used areas, hardening high use areas, and expanding/improving facilities to handle the volume of use (although there was still majority support). Concern probably focuses on their potential to attract more use or provide bank angler access to areas that are currently accessible primarily by boats. 6 Drift anglers were slightly more supportive of use limits, but still showed more opposition than support. Landowner opinions toward general strategies Landowners were similar to users for most strategies, showing majority support for most strategies and majority opposition toward use limits. However, there were some differences worth noting (see supplement): Landowners showed more opposition (44 for zoning regulations than drift anglers (31 This fits with the high proportion of landowners who use powerboats, although landowners showed less opposition than powerboat users (79% opposed). Landowners were similar to drift anglers (and different from other groups) in showing Tess support for new facilities and developing access to less -used places on the river. This is consistent with the "last settler" hypothesis (Neilson, Shelby Haas, 1977), where current users oppose additional development that may attract more use "close the door after I get settled October MG Page 87 Boater safety education programs Drift guides Drift anglers Power anglers Power guides Regulations to improve boating safety Drift guides Drift anglers Power anglers Power guides Zoning reps. to separate conflicts Drift guides Drift anglers Power anglers Power guides Guide opinions toward general management strategies Guide opinions were often similar to users in showing majority support for a broad array of strategies; drift and powerboat guides were also similar to their counterpart user groups (drift and powerboat anglers) when there were differences between those groups. In a few cases guides showed notably stronger support (or opposition) than users, as shown in Figure 10 -2. The supplement provides further details about guide opinions. Findings include: Drift and powerboat guides were much more supportive of boater education programs than users. Guides currently have to complete a week long guide course to work on the river, while there are no boater education requirements for users (although State Parks offers free one -day boater education courses). Drift guides were more supportive of boater safety regulations than drift anglers, who in turn were more supportive than powerboat anglers (although all showed majority support). Powerboat guides were divided over the need for boater safety regulation. Drift guides showed majority support for zoning (which might include additional drift only zones or times), while drift anglers showed more support than opposition. I.n contrast, 79% of powerboat guides were opposed to this idea, while only 51% of powerboat anglers reported the same. Drift guides were the only group to show majority support for limiting use through permits or reservations. The only users on the river that already have use limits are Upper River guides (the number of guides and "starts" per week is limited by the USUSFWS from the Russian River to Skilak). Some of these limit supporting guides may appreciate the ability of this approach to minimize impacts, but some also want limits applied to all groups (not just themselves). Limit use through permits Drift guides Drift anglers Power anglers Power guides 1 00% os„ IMPAWIMMMIONIE FAVAMINESSEMIN mann liSlro,210 MEN REV NM 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% strongly and slightly oppose slightly and strongly support Figure 10 -2. Percent support for selected general strategies among different groups. 100% October 2010 Page 88 Kenai ecreati n Stud it c s and rnp!ica4io s 11. Recreation Facility Development Maintenance Actions This chapter provides information from the follow-up survey about specific development and maintenance actions that might be used to address use and visitor impacts. Respondents were asked about 8 actions for the entire river, six for the Lower River, four for the Middle River, and three for the Upper River. Responses were given on a 5-point scale from "strongly support" to "strongly oppose," with a "neutral" option. The specific actions are listed below: For the entire river... Increase patrols and litter pick -up at public easements More restrooms in high use bank angler areas More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re -open parts of them) More fish cleaning stations in general More fencing signs to direct users to bank areas that can withstand the use More fishing platforms stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants Lower River New launch in Cunningham Park (mile 6) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and clocks at Pillars (mile 12.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) Improve restrooms and access across tidal mud at Cunningham Park (mile 6) New boat accessible restrooms near Mud Is. 1 Beaver Creek (mile 10) Middle River New launch on Funny River Road across from Morgan's (mile 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat accessible restro n ki €ley River outlet boat-accessible restrooms near II New boat accessible restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet Upper River Organize the 'spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area October 2010 P age 89 n Development actions for the entire river Figure 11 -1 shows support and opposition for development actions for the entire river. More detailed information for specific groups is provided in the supplemental report. Findings include: There is majority support and little opposition for nearly all of these actions. There is a clear consensus among most Kenai users patrol and pick -up programs; managing bank use and providing fishing platforms to prevent trampling; efforts to restore trampled areas; or providing more facilities such as boast accessible restrooms and fish cleaning stations. Results are consistent with issue priorities (Chapter 7) regarding biophysical impacts and handling the volume of use. Differences between user groups were statistically significant for six of the eight actions, but never substantively large. The largest differences were between bank and drift anglers on adding fishing platforms, reopening closed areas, and fish cleaning stations. Bank anglers were more supportive; drift angler support was less enthusiastic, perhaps because it might increase use in areas that drift anglers currently use but bank anglers do not. Landowners showed slightly more support for rest rooms and vegetation restoration, perhaps because those actions might reduce trespass problems. a Guides showed less support for managing carcasses, fishing platforms, and fencing to direct bank angling use, but more support for additional restrooms. Drift guides showed more support for patrols (the only significant difference with powerboat guides). Patrols and litter pick -up Restrooms in high use areas Restore areas with trampling Reopen closed areas/fish platforms More fish cleaning stations Fencing 1 direct use to min. trampling More fish platforms public easements Manage fish carcasses Fi jr s 1 l i at on 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 11.1. Percent support toward river-wide development actions for all users. October 2010 Page 90 Ken eation y.> y Major Fi r p Development actions on specific segments Figure 11 -2 shows support for development actions for specific segments. More detailed information for specific groups is in the supplemental report. Findings include: There is majority support and little opposition for all of these actions. For the Lower River, there were few statistically significant differences between groups. Powerboat anglers were slightly more supportive of Pillars expansion and a new launch at Cunningham, while bank anglers were slightly less supportive of any launch improvement and more supportive of Cunningham access and restrooms. For the Middle River, there were no significant differences between groups. For the Upper River, there was slightly greater support for Skilak Lake Road improvements compared to other actions, but no substantive differences between groups. There was less support for exploring ways to manage salmon carcasses on the Upper River than for fish cleaning stations in general (an action in the list for the entire river). This may indicate greater support for more cleaning facilities than other carcass management actions. A majority of guides supported all of these actions, but they sometimes showed statistically significant differences from users. Guides were more supportive of three specific actions on the Lower River: Cunningham access and boat accessible restroom improvements, Pillars expansion., and a new launch at Cunningham. They were less supportive of a new launch on Funny River Road or boat accessible restrooms near the outlet of Skilak Lake. Drift guides showed less support than powerboat guides for Bing's Landing improvements. New launch Cunningham Park New launch Pastures Expand parking/docks Pillars New launch Ciechanski Access/restrooms Cunningham Boat restrooms Mud Island New launch Funny River Road Expand/improve Bing's Landing New boat restrooms Killey River New boat restrooms Skilak Lake out. Organize trails Improve Skilak Lake Road Russian River bear attractants MEW Mar Ma le Lower River Middle River Upper River 12% 9% 8% 18% 14% 8% 65 61% 69% 58% 69% 68% 5,8% 61% 58% 56% 60% 64% 60 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2016 4016 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 11 -2. Percent support for development actions on specific segments for all users. October 2010 Page 91 Kelm RecreaCon Stu. Integrating development findings ajo Findl a ions With extensive support for development options, it may be challenging to decide which deserve priority. Development actions can help reduce human impacts to biophysical resources; provide convenient easy access to bank fishing locations; accommodate the sheer volume of use, and reduce congestion at other facilities; or may help redistribute use to reduce on -river crowding. In sorting through development options, agencies should probably consider the following: Will development accommodate existing use or attract even higher use? On -site survey data (Chapter 6) showed higher crowding scores while fishing than at launches, parking lots, or other facilities. Development may reduce congestion at facilities, but exacerbate on -river crowding. With this in mind, development that narrowly targets specific impact problems in specific geographic locations probably makes the most sense. For example, boat accessible restrooms downstream of Pillars (e.g., Beaver Creek/Mud Island, Pastures, or improvements at Cunningham) would primarily reduce boat traffic (and associated wake caused turbidity) between downstream fishing water and the public facilities at Pillars and decrease mid morning dock congestion at Pillars. Well situated restrooms may also reduce "user- created" toilets in the alders. With Lower River peak use reaching as high as 400 to 500 boats (multiplied by 3 to 5 people per boat), the existing boat accessible toilets at Pillars and Cunningham (difficult to access during low tides) are probably not handling the demand. For powerboat use, new launches or improved parking at existing launches present difficult choices. These may relieve congestion at existing launches, provide greater convenience, or reduce private launch fees. But if this simply adds more boats without redistributing them, crowding and impacts will worsen. A new launch in the lower part of the Lower River might reduce "back and forth" traffic (and resulting crowding), depending on whether users choose launches based on fees, proximity to their residence, or proximity to fishing grounds. Agencies should also note that the number of boats launching from private docks is likely to increase regardless of public launch development (as more lots develop docks). For drift boat use, launch development presents a different set of issues. Unlike powerboats, drift craft go in one direction, and launches need to be appropriately spaced to provide a diversity of trips. If additional "drift -only fishing days" on the Lower or Middle River are contemplated (see Chapter 13), developing more drift access points will be critical to even distributions of use that avoid "bottlenecks" at the few existing take -outs. There is a shortage of good driftboat access below Eagle Rock, which is particularly problematic when opposing winds and tides are strong. Development actions at launches for the Upper River (potentially at Sportsman's, Jim's or Upper Skilak) were not specifically addressed in the survey (these are not State Park facilities). However, some open -ended comments encouraged these improvements, and based on support for other launch development, we speculate they would have attracted majority support too. The Upper River survey technician, who spent considerable time at .lira's Landing, informally collected improvement suggestions in another section of the supplemental report. Development that "organizes" user created trails or provides additional light- penetrating boardwalks to prevent tramping of riparian vegetation is more straight- forward. Several agencies and non- profits have supported these actions since the early 1.990s, and data indicate users continue to appreciate the benefits and support them. October 2010 Page 92 tillBE G i n Study Major dmas agcl I Lions Aside from biological benefits aspects, there are some trade -offs from hardening trails or banks. Additional development decreases primitiveness and visual quality of the natural setting. Most of the Kenai is not "wilderness- like" and has extensive development, but parts of the river (particularly federal lands on the Upper and Middle River) are relatively undeveloped. Additional information on visual impacts of docks, platforms, and other development is provided in Chapter 16. "Carcass management" and its effect on human -bear interactions is another complex topic that requires both biological and social information. The large number of carcasses at popular fishing areas (especially the Russian River confluence during red runs) is a recognized problem; two questions asked about "managing fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants," and "more fish cleaning tables" on the entire river, while another asked about "exploring alternative ways to manage carcasses" on the Upper River. In all cases, support was strong among all groups. Without responses to more detailed questions,' it is challenging to interpret support as a mandate for specific actions. Fish cleaning stations might be received differently by their size and frequency, whether they have carcass "grinders" or other removal system, and whether they include buildings to reduce odors and keep bears out. Other bear carcass management choices could range from regulations that require fish to be carried out whole to changing bear behavior through substantial aversive conditioning. Support is likely to vary for each. Each carcass management strategy is also likely to have varying biological consequences and degrees of effectiveness, with no single approach likely to work on its own. Ultimately, reducing carcass concentrations that attract bears may require a mix of facility, education, and regulation actions. To be effective, agencies will probably need to 1) settle on what they want users to do (which may vary for different locations on the Russian and the Kenai); 2) develop a clear education program that encourages this behavior (and be prepared to back it up with regulations); and 3) and develop appropriate facilities that cue and enable the appropriate behavior(s). In an ideal world, agencies could experiment with different mixes of education and facilities to see which is most effective, but they may not have the luxury of time and resources to conduct such systematic assessments. In the meantime, continued monitoring of human -bear interactions and carcass concentrations may help identify problems and suggest ways to address then. In conjunction with planning for this study, the Forest Service developed a more systematic human -bear interaction monitoring program in 2009, which is set to be continued in 2010. Excerpts from the Forest Service monitoring report are provided in the supplemental report for comprehensiveness. The supplement also includes users' open -ended comments on bear and carcass issues, which may help agencies gauge the range of opinion on this contentious issue. All development involves capital investments as well as staff, equipment, and budgets to maintain them. All development may also have technical design challenges or biological and cultural resource impacts. There appears to be stronger public support for improving and maintaining existing facilities before building new ones. During planning for the present survey, agencies elected not to pursue questions about more specific development, education, or regulation actions because this issue really needs a separate study. October 2010 Page 93 Upper river Develop fire education enforcement program in Russian River area ec e d Study. 0 Major Fin a i, 12. Education and Regulation Actions This chapter provides information from the ollow-up s urvey about specific education and regulation actions that might be used to address use and visitor impacts. Respondents were asked about seven actions for the entire river, three for the Lower River, three for the Middle River, and one for the Upper River. Responses were on a 5-point scale from "strongly support" to "strongly oppose," with a neutral" option. The specific actions are listed below: For the entire river Clarify and strictly enforce "no anchoring in channel" regulations (particularly in silver season) Create brochures and internet media showing how to boat and fish during high density periods Offer a one day course about how to operate powerboats during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license" for powerboat operators (includes a written test) Require all boaters to wear PFDs (life jackets) Close more areas to bank fishing where existing use is trampling vegetation Restrictions on number of fish allowed to be cleaned when others are waiting Lower river No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Stagger guided start times in July to reduce launch congestion Middle river No wake zones in high density areas such as Swiftwater, Dot's Landing, or "3rd Hole" near Killey River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Restrict drift boats from traveling upstream using kickers (to minimize large wakes) October 2010 Page 94 enaE R treat on u or FThdim Im EFea o Education regulation actions for the entire river Figure 12 -1 shows support for all users taken together. Information for specific groups is in Figure 12 -2 and the supplemental report. Findings include: There is majority support but some opposition for most actions. There was generally more support for education efforts to improve boating skills knowledge than for regulations requiring a "Kenai River boating license" or wearing PFDs. Users showed majority support for closing more areas to bank fishing to reduce trampling, although bank anglers themselves were divided (42% support, 38% oppose). About 26 miles of Kenai shoreline has already been restricted, and results suggest users (particularly boaters) may accept further restrictions if needed. Landowners were similar more likely to support closing more bank angling areas to prevent trampling. This result may reflect concern about bank anglers trespassing on private property. Enforce no anchoring in channel regs. New media re: fishing in high use One day course on fishing high use Kenai boating license/written test Require all boaters to wear PFD Close more areas to bank trampling Restrict fish at cleaning stations 13% 1Q% 19% 29% 29% 29% 26% 62% 62% 54% 52% 50% 50% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 12 -1. Percent support for education/regulation actions for the entire river for all users. October 2010 Page 95 Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners All guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners All guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides 100% to ak Re a Stc pd r p m a kr s Figure 12 -2 shows differences between user, guide, and landowner groups for three actions where differences were substantive. Findings include: Guides strongly support (83 a one day course on how to boat in high use situations, along with 55 to 62% of drift and bank anglers, but powerboat anglers and landowners were more divided. State Parks currently offers a free one day course on boating in Alaska, but it is not specific to the Kenai or high use periods, and attendance does not approach the number of boaters who fish the river. Guides, drift anglers, and bank anglers show majority support for requiring boaters to obtain a Kenai boater license that includes a written test, but this has more opposition than support among powerboaters and landowners {the user groups most likely to be affected). The KRSMA River Use Committee has discussed several existing internet -based courses (with tests) that might be used to improve boater education, encouraging voluntary participation. Guides are required to take a week- long course to guide the river; they probably think it's a good idea for non guided users to obtain some similar training. Majorities of bank anglers, drift anglers, and drift guides support a requirement that boaters wear PFDs while on the river, while powerboat anglers and powerboat guides are opposed. This result reflects two distinct boating cultures. Many drift anglers regularly wear PFDs while powerboat anglers on the Kenai rarely wear PFDs. The strength of powerboat guide opposition anticipates their resistance to this potential regulation. The survey did not explore potential explanations for resistance to wearing PFDs among powerboaters, but this is a major focus of State Park's boating safety program (see lit :try: /pledgetol.ive.oril). Drowning is the second leading cause of accidental death in Alaska, and it has the higher per capita drowning rate in the country. Nearly 3 out of 4 boating fatalities are due to boaters being immersed in cold water without wearing a life jacket. More in depth questions about PFSD use (or non -use) was beyond the scope of this study. V MEWS EWE One day course boating in high use areas Kenai boating license/ 46% written test 46% Require boaters to wear PFDs 74% 45% 31% 28% 30% 14% 15% 16°/ 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% aka 8% i 61% 52% 48 50 %u 55% 20% 40% 60% 62% 64 61% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support 83% 80% 100% Figure 12 -2, Percent support for three specific education/regulation actions among different groups. October MO Page 96 nai ec a No wake zones Open driving lane regulations Stagger guided start times in July No wake zones Open driving lane regulations No upstream travel with kickers RR fire education program Education regulation actions for different segments Figure 1.2 -3 shows support for specific education regulation actions on different segments. information for specific user groups is given below or in the supplemental report. Findings include: There is majority support for boating safety regulations such as no wake zones or driving lanes on the Lower River; on the Middle River there is majority support for no wake zones, but less support for driving lanes, There were significant differences among groups for no wake zones and driving lanes. For example, 54% of Lower River powerboat anglers supported no wake zones compared to more than 75% for bank and drift anglers. There were similar differences for no wake zones on the Middle River, There are striking differences between drift and powerboat guides for no wake and driving lane actions. For example, 85% of drift guides support no wake zones compared with only 28% of powerboat guides. There is overall majority support for staggered guided start times in July, but there are statistically significant differences between unguided and guided users {60% vs. 48% support). Guides were also opposed to staggered guide hours (63% of drift guides and 82% of powerboat guides). Perceptions about the importance of "being first" at a hole {discussed in Chapter 5) probably drive this result. There is majority support for fire education on the Upper River, and unsurprising result given its broad topic. USFS and StreamWatch volunteers report that small campfires are common in the Russian River area despite potential fire dangers. This question was designed to ascertain public support for more intensive fire education efforts to reduce these. 9ifl armed mp €cgs 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 12 3. Percent support or oppose segment- specific education /regulation actions. October 2010 Page 97 Kees, Recreation S Mai. Or FindIn s art gr c 1 Integrating education and regulation actions Additional considerations when assessing education or regulation options include: Education actions are a "cognitive fix" approach, where agencies use information to modify user behavior that may be causing unacceptable biophysical or social impacts. Managers and the public sometimes view education as panacea (Roggenbuck, 1992) that is less intrusive than regulations, but both may be helpful in different situations. Education actions in river settings focus on minimum impact practices (e.g., no trace camping, human waste disposal); resource competition ethics (e.g., codes of behavior in "combat fishing" settings) angling ethics (e.g., catch and release of non- anadramous species); and safety (e.g., powerboat "rules of the road" education). Attempts to establish "informal norms" for these behaviors are evident in agency literature, information boards, and the popular media. These efforts probably expose most users to the appropriate information, but their influence on behavior is less clear. Persuasion research indicates that using messages to change both attitudes and behavior over the long term can be complex and challenging, and many user practices are learned from peers and relatives rather than agency communications (Manfredo, 1992). Regulatory actions focus on changing behavior, but don't rely on changing their attitudes first. Regulations are "formal norms" enforced through "external sanctions," and they become necessary when educational alternatives fall short. Educational and regulatory approaches are often complementary rather than "either -or" alternatives (Lucas, 1982). Many regulations reinforce initial educational efforts and encourage users to "self- enforce," and regulations need to be widely known to be effective. In many cases, regulations raising awareness about problem behaviors (and the impacts they cause) is more important than actual enforcement (which may be challenging). Applying these concepts to a longstanding issue on the Lower River may help illustrate. When congestion increases, the slower moving techniques (back trolling or back bouncing) prevent drifters from using the same water (and vice versa). Anglers interested in ensuring that "traditional" drifts remain available have requested educational_ efforts to identify, boundaries for their activity. Without judging the desirability of this goal, the open question is whether education can work or more formal regulations are necessary. We believe education can be effective, but it probably requires substantial effort. First, consensus opinion leaders such as guides and well -known unguided users need to support the concept and help identify the specific reach boundaries. Second, the zone(s) need to be identified on- site and on maps, brochures, and launch kiosks to tell a consistent story about when and where the "technique restriction" applies. This message needs to appear through other "channels" including popular media, web forums, tackle shops, and agency materials. Third, the message needs to be accompanied by a simple explanation of why separate zones are important and "fair." Because, particular techniques tend to be lost in higher densities unless everyone "goes along," zones need to be crafted with as sense of equity, considering relative proportions of anglers using different techniques. Finally, agencies and on -river opinion leaders need to support "norm development" through positive and negative sanctions. Agency '`enforcement" that teaches "violators" why they should respect techniques of fellow anglers is likely to be as effective as "law enforcement." An "internalized" norm October 2010 Page 98 .esarat on Sty a l F zags with self-enforcement is the ultimate goal, particularly because extensive ranger enforcement is too costly. The education model breaks down if a group of users doesn't go along with the behavior (e.g., they want to back troll in the traditional drift area, regardless of the use level or how many others are inconvenienced). In this case, the offending behavior is "willfully depreciative;" regulations followed up with enforcement are probably necessary (Roggenbuck, 1992). In our experience, few recreation users fit in the "willfully depreciative" category, and well developed norms can be effective. For example, educational efforts on Oregon's North Umpqua River have successfully implemented no boating zones and times (to prevent conflicts between scenic rafters and wading anglers) during the peak steelhead season. Signs and brochures strongly recommend "no boating" in these zones and times, no regulation was needed, and compliance is near total. t ober 2010 Page 99 This chapter provides information from the fallo -u survey about "drift- only" issues on the Lower and Middle River. The survey briefly described the current situation: Mondays in May, June, and July are "drift -only days" on the Lower and Middle River (from River Mile 4 to Skilak Lake), On these days, fishing from a motorized boat is not allowed (and guides are also not allowed), Some people have suggested adding more "drift -only days" on these segments, but with drift guiding allowed. Please tell us whether you support or oppose the following "drift -only" actions. Follow -up questions asked about general support for additional dry- only days (and how many), and preferred days and months. General support opposition for "drift- only" days Two separate questions asked respondents whether in general, more `drift -only' days should be added" to the Lower River and Middle River. A third question asked, "If drift only days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available for powerboats)." Responses were given on a 5- point scale from "strongly support" to "strongly oppose" with a "neutral" option (see Figure 13 -1). Drift guides Drift anglers Bank anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Powerboat guides Drift guides Drift anglers Bank anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Powerboat guides Drift guides Drift anglers Bank anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Powerboat guides Lower River 73% Argifti rttl PAM PnIkteimm 56% 43% 21% 25% 60% 56% 53% 51% 49% 1 0 0% 13. "Drift- only" issues 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% strongly or slightly oppose 27% 20% 40% 46% 5*1% 8O% %slightly or strongy support 83% 88% 85% 80% 100% Figure 13.1. Percent support or oppose "drift- only" days on different segments for different groups. 2 Respondents uninterested in these segments or the issue could skip them; among users, 51% of landowners, 50% of drift anglers, 44% of powerboat anglers, and 32% of bank anglers answered them. Among guides, 88% of drift guides and 78% of powerboat guides answered them. October 2010 Page 100 Preferences for months Ken, ten ion Study Wiaor Fii1 d nq and How many additional "drift only" days? Preferences for days of the week Findings include: In general, results show a typical user conflict pattern: most non- motorized users support more drift only days and most motorized users oppose them, with drift guides the most supportive and powerboat guides the most opposed. The pattern of responses across groups is similar for both segments. This suggests strongly held attitudes rather than segment characteristics. Landowners are generally divided. Many use powerboats as their primary craft, but they also live on the river and might benefit from more days with less powerboat traffic (e.g., reduced bank erosion and noise). For the "alternating drift-only days by segments" option, polarization is reduced and some groups shift opinions. Drift guides shift from majority support to divided, a majority of powerboat anglers join drift and bank anglers in support, and powerboat guides reduce their opposition. This suggests some "compromise" zoning options may gain greater acceptance, particularly if there are substitutes for those displaced by a drift-only regulation. Nonetheless, the intensity of some verbatim comments (see supplemental report) suggests that even compromise options will be strongly opposed by some users on each "side" of this debate. Among those who support more "drift only" days, respondents were asked to specify the number of days that should be added. Findings follow the polarized general attitudes discussed above. Among the few supportive powerboat anglers, 72% recommended adding just one day. Among drift anglers, 1.7% want every day to be drift -only, 30% prefer three, four, or five more, and 53% recommend one or two. Among other groups, 61% of bank anglers, 71% of landowners, 52% of driftboat guides and 72% of powerboat guides prefer one or two additional days. If compromise alternatives are developed, these data suggest focusing on one or two additional drift -only days. Among those who support more "drift only" days, respondents were asked to specify days of the week. Responses varied widely. Slightly higher percentages of drift anglers prefer Wednesdays, Fridays, or Sundays, while the few of the supportive powerboat anglers leaned toward Thursdays. Drift boat guides slightly favored Sundays (a day they currently cannot fish on the Lower and Middle River before August). If compromise drift -only proposals are developed, survey data offer no clear guidance about days of the week. Among those who support more "drift only" days, respondents were asked to specify months. More drift users and guides prefer July and August, while powerboat anglers and guides prefer June and July. Among all groups, there is less interest in September or May (when use levels are likely low enough that it doesn't matter). If compromise drift only alternatives are developed, these data suggest focusing on mid summer (particularly July). October 2010 Page 101 Kenai c eatio Stmi 11 Findings Drift guides Powerboat guides Prospective use of "drift only" days by guides ndI to s Guides were asked, "If additional `drift only' days are added, would you offer guided drift fishing or sightseeing trips on those days (assume guides would be allowed to operate) Responses (Figure 13 -2) show 94% of drift guides and 65% of powerboat guides said "yes." Results may broadly characterize guide intentions, but intentions are not always highly correlated with actual behavior (Fishbein Azjen, 1975), and several assumptions may underlie those intentions. However, if one accepts these "intentions to participate" at face value, they suggest potential guided use on additional drift only days. By rough calculation, if current peak July powerboat guide use on the Lower River ranges from 150 to 200 boats, the number of guided drift boats on drift only days might range as high as 100 to 130 boats. Add 30 to 40 drift guides that already offer float trips on the Middle River, and total guided use on any `new' drift only days could easily exceed 150 boats. Assuming unguided use equaled current driftboat Monday use, total boats on drift only days could exceed 250 boats, more than double the highest drift only Monday in 2009. 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% definitely and probably no probably and definitely yes Figure 13 -2. Percent of drift and powerboat guides reporting they would use drift only days. Guides who said they would not use additional drift only days were asked to specify their reasons. Responses are given in Figure 13 -3 (percents sum to greater than 100% because respondents could check any that apply). Findings include: The two most important reasons are that clients or the guides themselves prefer to fish from a powerboat. Logistics of shuttles and insufficient launch sites to provide a diversity of trip options are also important reasons. Verbatim comments highlighted the added challenges of drift trips (e.g., need for parking at put -in and take -out, need for appropriately- spaced launches, need for launches to access best fishing locations such as downstream of Eagle Rock, inability to come and go from a riverside dock). Half of the guides checked the physical demands of rowing. Some comments also noted that the challenges of rowing (particularly for unguided users) might encourage more anchor use, which may have habitat and social competition impacts. Fewer guides said they did not have a drift vessel available, would have less flexibility to reach fishing hot spots, or would be unable to match powerboat success rates. Almost none said they would have to learn new fishing techniques or skills. October 2010 Page 102 .Ken Recr ion to y., pjor FEnc n s My clients prefer powerboat -based fishing 1 prefer guiding from a powerboat Logistical challenges (complicated shuttles) Existing launches do not offer enough trip options Physical demands of rowing 1 don't have a driftboat raft to use for guiding Less flexibility to reach "hot" fishing locations Drift fishing can't match powerboat success rates Requires learning new ways and places to fish 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent checking response 100% 100% Figure 13.3. Percent of guides checking reasons for not using additional drift only days (if provided). October 2010 Pace 103 K. naj Rec r atit 1 Sir y Maior Findi ons Conceptual and process issues Developing "drift only" alternatives Deciding whether to add more drift -only periods on the Middle or Lower Kenai is among the most consequential and controversial issues on the river. To non motorized stakeholders, expanded drift-only would reduce crowding; produce non- motorized recreation opportunities; and address hydrocarbon, turbidity, and erosion impacts from powerboat use. To motorized stakholders, non motorized regulations would displace them from traditional powerboat use areas without reducing (and possibly exacerbating) crowding, congestion, or related impacts. To agencies weighing these issues, type of use zoning could also substantively affect facility needs, education and enforcement programs, and fishing success and harvest. Several of these issues are out of the scope of this study (e.g., biophysical effects and impacts on the fishery). The survey focused on support and opposition for expanded non motorized zones /times, not the underlying reasons for those opinions. However, these types of conflicts are not uncommon in river settings, so findings from other studies may help on the Kenai, In addition, many users and stakeholders have offered considerations in this debate. We have distilled them below: Conflicts between motorized and non motorized users are well documented in the recreation literature (Lucas, 1964; Jacob Schreyer, 1980; Shelby, 1980; Adelman et al., 1982; Jackson Wong, 1982; Kuss et al., 1990; Graefe, 2004). Research shows antipathy from non motorized users toward motorized use in many situations, particularly more primitive settings. This is often one -sided or "asymmetric," with motorized users relatively unconcerned about encounters with non motorized use. Conflicts may have a value -based component that is independent of actual encounters with motorized users (i.e., social values conflict; see Vaske et al., 1995). Research on conflicts between motorized and non motorized use has looked at backgrounds and attitudes of users, economic impacts, safety, enforcement problems, and ecological effects on wildlife, plants, and water quality (Kuss et al., 1990). While these issues are interesting and important, they sometimes obscure the more central issue, which is the nature of contrasting experiences (Shelby, 1980). Most conflicts are addressed by separating uses in space or in time. The success of zoning solutions depends on whether they are perceived to be equitable. Few solutions will satisfy everyone, and some stakeholders will criticize any zoning compromise (particularly the "non- sensitive" users, who perceive few costs to sharing an area). User conflicts are typically conceived as a "zero sum game" (if one group wins, the other loses), so these issues can become politicized and possibly litigated. As with other contentious issues, focusing on interests rather than positions may help develop compromise solutions (Fisher et al., 1992; Spangler, 2003). Biophysical resource impacts are often used to justify motorized use restrictions. On the Kenai, potential biophysical issues include hydrocarbon pollution, turbidity, wildlife disturbance, and boat wake erosion, some of which have been addressed by existing motorized use regulations (e.g., Swan habitat non motorized zone on the Middle River in early summer; 50 horsepower motor limits; four- Octobe 2010 Page 104 a€ Recr at o Stugy or Fmd t a t stroke engine regulations; Upper River non motorized segment). Social experience issues may have been an underlying consideration with some of these regulations, and all clearly have impacts on experiences regardless of their basis. In many conflicts, the "sensitive" group develops long lists of safety, environmental, and experiential impacts from the "offending" group's use, hoping one or more may resonate among decision makers and lead to regulations restrict the offending use in some tunes of places. Faced with these assertions, the "accused" group may develop similar lists about the first, and the conflict becomes less asymmetric (Graefe, 2004). Assertions on both sides may be difficult to validate, and sometimes "scapegoat issues" obscure underlying philosophical or value -based differences about which type of use is appropriate. We encourage all stakeholders to prioritize and be transparent about the impacts that matter the most to them. This provides agencies with the best chance of working out acceptable compromises that provide each group with adequate opportunities. Non motorized river users from a study on Alaska's Delta River (Whittaker and Shelby, 2006) considered all 11 impacts from motorized use "important," while motorized users only rated four "important." Non motorized users rated noise, the notion that motors are inappropriate in some places, and ensuring the availability of non- motorized experiences as their most important reasons. Of these, only noise was considered important for a majority of motorized users (discourteous behavior, boating safety, and biophysical impacts round out the motorized list). This .highlight a fundamental difference between the two groups non motorized users may purposely seek out places or times with no motorized use, but that is not important for most motorized boaters. i There is jurisdictional complexity with motorized /non- motorized issues on the Kenai because decisions could be driven by recreation experience, fisheries management, or biophysical impact considerations. In addition, decisions would probably affect facilities or lands managed by different entities. For example, existing drift -boat Mondays on the Lower and Middle River in July are a Board of Fish regulation, while non motorized use zones on the Skilak end of the Middle River to protect swans in early summer are regulated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. State Parks regulations create non motorized zones on the Upper River and appear to have been developed for social experience purposes. Coordinated decision making among all the major agencies could consider the full range of issues, consequences, and agency mandates, but this may be challenging. The KRSMA board offers an institutional opportunity to improve.. coordination and comprehensive planning, but different agencies and boards have their own decision making processes and it is unclear which ones will take the lead on addressing these issues. Stakeholders may consider using any available legal or public relations "hook" to achieve their goals, so agencies (or stakeholders with differing positions) may find it preferable to approach such issues through a comprehensive process that reviews the full set of issues at stake to ensure that all are considered when making these major recreation management decisions. Specific considerations for drift only alternatives on the Kenai Existing drift -only Monday regulations apply to the Lower and Middle River for June and July, so stakeholders interested in additional non motorized opportunities tend think in terms of extending those regulations to other days. However, more targeted sub segments or time periods might improve acceptance, particularly if the restriction doesn't apply to both segments at the same time. October 2010 Page 105 s9. iq# ee ion 8."uds_, r 4 f� ndi81 t'e Alternatives should clarify target seasons and segments. On the Lower River, drift -only stakeholders may focus on July because this is the season when powerboat use has largely displaced drift use (less than 2% of boats on the Lower River from Tuesdays to Sundays are non motorized). However, there may also be interest in Lower River drift only opportunities during silver season. Most Lower River use on drift -only Mondays occurs from Centennial Park to Eagle Rock (or stationary drift boats at Beaver Creek). .Regulations could target the area upstream of Eagle Rock or Pillars, leaving downstream segments motorized. In contrast, Middle River use during kings is low and may not be important to drift anglers (who have not been displaced by heavy motorized use). Agencies might explore drift -only days during the trout/Dolly /silver season. in August and early September, and perhaps only for the Skilak to Kenai Keys segment (the focus of most non motorized fishing). Alternatives that restrict motorized use for a portion of the day (e.g., the middle of the day) may be more acceptable. For example, a drift -only regulation from Skilak to Kenai Keys from 10 am to 4 pm could allow powerboats to access the segment to bank fish or drift with their motor off, but still provide a non motorized opportunity during prime fishing hours. Alternatives that restrict "upstream use" or require "no wake speeds" (rather than a total motor restriction) may offer an alternative to drift -only regulations, providing a "less motorized" rather than non motorized experience. A variation on the "mid -day non motorized" example (above) could allow powerboats to use their engines for steering/holding in the current or cruising downstream as long as they didn't throw a wake. This creates a "downstream travel only" use pattern, which could reduce congestion and the impacts of powerboats that "run laps" without excluding all powerboat use. Another variation on a "less motorized" alternative could restrict powerboat use to one upstream trip per day in a segment; there is a similar regulation from Kenai Lake to Princess Lodge on the Upper River. It allows lake users to drift the first part of the river and motor back once in a day, but does not allow "running laps." There are enforcement challenges, but it also creates a "mostly downstream" use pattern that would probably reduce congestion. W Alternatives that contemplate landowner exemptions for access (especially to properties that have no road access) are likely to increase landowner support without adding much motorized use. There may be legal challenges to such exemptions. Improving access to popular fishing areas downstream of Eagle Rock is critical for additional drift only days to "work," particularly if drift only use levels reach 200 to 300 boats (as estimated earlier). This segment has roughly seven miles of good fishing water that is easily accessible to powerboats, but difficult to use in driftboats. Although drift anglers with property on Beaver Creek can access the confluence area and return, others must use upstream put -ins (e.g., Pillars, Eagle Rock) and fight tides and winds to reach take -outs below the Warren Ames Bridge. There are two possible approaches to improving access: 1. Allow kicker or trolling motors for downstream travel on drift only days. Existing restrictions do not allow boats to carry an engine while fishing on drift-only Mondays, and some anglers park a vehicle with their outboard at Cunningham Park then swap it for their fishing gear in order to motor downstream legally. If additional drift only days are contemplated, they are likely to garner more support if kickers can be used 1) downstream from a certain point, 2) after fishing, or October 2010 Page 106 rea i fl Maier Findings and 1 ,J)11,cat s 3) for downstream travel only. While enforcement of more complicated regulations may be challenging, using kickers would help more evenly distribute use and reduce congestion. 2. Develop additional launch sites and associated parking, particularly on the lower seven miles between Eagle Rock and Warren Ames Bridge, to increase trip options and help distribute use. There is strong support for additional launches (see Chapter 11), but construction and environmental issues are substantial (e.g., steep bluff banks, wetlands, tidal zone mud, and cultural sites). Several Lower 48 rivers (as well as a few in AK) have friction based ramps on steep banks that can be used by light craft such as driftboats and rafts, but these are not particularly efficient compared to drive -in ramps. Finding room for parking could be similarly challenging, because drift -only days require facilities that handle traffic at both put -ins and take- outs (powerboats need parking at only one ramp). Even with more launches or parking, drift-only days that include guided use will probably have much higher use than existing drift -only Mondays. The potential for crowding and congestion will increase, and the lesser mobility of drift craft (compared to powerboats) makes it more difficult for users to avoid each other and spread out. Compatibility of different king fishing techniques (drift vs. backtroll) may also remain an issue; some anglers will hold against the current or drift slowly downstream, but others will not. A few anglers may also use anchors, which may exacerbate "territorial" competition that sometimes occurs during silver season (where anchoring is common). There are already anecdotal reports of this becoming a problem on existing drift boat Mondays (discussion at K.RSMA guide committee meeting, October, 2010). Adding drift -only segments or periods has the potential to increase crowding and congestion during powerboat use periods. Demand for powerboat -based angling is unlikely to decrease, but with fewer days available, densities will probably be higher. To the extent that powerboaters shift to drift use on drift -only days, this effect will be smaller. Any drift-only alternative will displace both guided and unguided powerboat use, but the effects on guided use will probably be greater (especially in king season, where there are existing restrictions on days and hours). To the extent that drift only alternatives minimize guide market and pricing effects, guides may be more willing to accept them. October 2010 Page 107 "Recr 'an St y tql,to Ipucatiop 14. Capacities and Use Limit Actions This chapter provides information from the follow -up survey about use limit actions and estimates of capacities. Questions asked respondents about philosophy toward use limits, user registration programs, parking time limits, and different types of limits on specific segments (using the 5-point support oppose scale with "neutral" and "don't know" options). Other questions asked respondents to estimate boat capacities for the Lower and Upper River. Background Capacities (and the use limit actions that implement them) are another approach and perhaps the most direct for addressing overuse. The capacity concept recognizes there is a limit to the amount of use that an area can accommodate without impairing natural resource or experiential values. Five decades of research suggests the links between use and impacts can be complex, but several visitor impact planning frameworks (e.g., C -CAP, LAC, VIM, and VERP) can be used to develop capacities (Stankey et al., 1985; Shelby and Heberlein, 1986; Graefe et al., 1990, Manning, 2008; Whittaker et al., 2010). Use limits are a powerful management strategy for dealing with some impacts, especially in geographically concentrated areas such as river corridors. Differences in the research literature, planning frameworks, "in -the- field" approaches, and court rulings have sometimes led to confusion or debate about the capacity concept. In a recent "state of knowledge" monograph (Whittaker et al., 2010), capacity is defined as the amount and type of use that is compatible with the "management prescription" for an area, which includes: Management goals and objectives for all important uses and values, including desired recreation opportunities to be provided. "Desired conditions" and the "mix" of resource uses and values to be managed for. Standards that quantitatively define appropriate levels for goals, objectives, desired conditions, and /or indicators. Planned management program and actions to meet goals and objectives, provide desired conditions, and avoid violating standards. Budget and personnel resources that will be used to implement management actions. A capacity is a number specified by units of use, time, and location components (e.g. float trips per day on a particular reach, people at one time fishing in an area). Although it is common to speak of a single capacity for a river, many areas will have multiple capacities for different types of uses, facilities, segments, seasons, or other managerially- relevant parameters. Use limit actions, the specific management actions that keep use from exceeding capacities, can he direct (e.g., permit systems) or indirect (e.g., managing parking lot sizes). In general, managing use levels is more likely to be effective addressing social impacts such as encounter levels or competition for sites and facilities. In contrast, many biophysical impacts appear less directly related to use levels because initial or low levels of use may create proportionately larger impacts (Hammitt Cole 1987; Kuss et al., 1990). For example, the first few groups to pioneer a campsite have the greatest impacts on vegetation loss; subsequent groups then camp in the same areas and typically cause Less additional impact (Cole, 1987). October 2010 page 108 Philosophy toward use limits In river settings like the Kenai, use limits are a potentially effective tool because several social impacts are related to use (Chapter 6). The trade -off is a reduction in access and a heavier managerial footprint. To assess opinion toward these trade -offs, respondents were asked a "philosophy toward use limits" question used in several previous river studies (including the 1992 Kenai study). Results for different groups are shown in Figure 14 -1; comparisons between 2009 and 1992 are shown in Figure 14 -2. More details are provided in the supplemental report. Would you accept having to compete for a limited number of permits to use parts of the river if it meant there would be fewer other people on the river when you use it? 1, Yes some limits on use are needed 2. Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available 3. Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse 4. No I'll always want unlimited access to the river Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Mon anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides Scenic guides October 2010 Ket RecreatiwS F n -n s ano rrl €o s 38% 41% 48% 64% r• 35% 30% 62% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% "no, never" or "not now" "maybe" or "yes" Figure 14-1. Responses about a permit system that reduces use. 100% 2009 powerboat anglers 1992 powerboat anglers K. nai R creati n Stud a` Ufl and i w 'c t€ ns 2009 drift anglers 1992 drift anglers 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% "no, never" or "not now" "maybe" or "yes" Figure 14 -2. Comparing 1992 and 2009 responses toward a permit system that reduces use. Findings include: Most user groups and powerboat guides oppose use limits. Nearly half of bank anglers, powerboat anglers, and powerboat guides always want unlimited access, while about a quarter oppose limits now, but might accept them later if crowding gets worse. Drift anglers were more divided, with 48% supporting limits now or in the future. However, less than 17% in any of these groups believe limits are needed now. Drift and scenic rafting guides are the only groups with majority support for use limits. They are also the only groups on the river that are currently limited (on the I ipper River). Comparisons between 1992 and 2009 (Figure 14-2) suggest that "philosophies toward use limits" have been relatively stable over time, although drift anglers have slightly increased and powerboat anglers have slightly decreased their support. Results are similar to other rivers in Alaska, although multi -day non motorized users were more inclined to support limits. On the Gulkana River in 1999, 56% of Upper River drift anglers supported or might support use limits, compared to 27% of powerboat anglers. On the Delta River in 2004, 67% of floaters supported limits, compared to 32% of motorized users. Taken together, findings suggest little support among Kenai users for limits. Any future support is probably contingent on worsening impacts and developing a fair system for distributing access. Powerboat and bank anglers are generally less likely to support use limits. There is little tradition for directly managing numbers of powerboats or bank anglers through permit systems. Drift anglers and drift guides are the most likely to accept a use limit system. In contrast to bank and powerboat anglers, drift anglers may have some familiarity with permit systems on drift oriented rivers. There are about two dozen rivers in North America with limited permit systems and over 100 others have capacities identified but not yet reached or enforced (Whittaker and Shelby, 2008). Few are primarily day use rivers like the Kenai, but a couple (e.g., Oregon's Deschutes and Coloraod's Arkansas River) have similar high use levels. October 2010 Page 110 Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Non anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides Scenic guides October 2010 Kenai Rec ation Study Major €n in an s Many bank and boat anglers on the Kenai may not recognize that use levels at specific facilities (e.g., launches, state park units, anglers using the Ferry and Russian River day use parking lots) are managed consistent with their facility capacities, and may indirectly influence segment -wide capacities. Should limits reduce, freeze, or increase use? A follow -up question asked whether use limits should reduce, freeze, or increase use (see below). Responses are only given for those who support use limits (a minority of users) are given in Figure 14 -3. If a permit system were tried on one or more Kenai River segments, should it... (Circle one number) 1. Reduce use compared to current levels 2. Freeze use near current levels 3. Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) 4. Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 5. I oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase 0% 90% Figure 14 -3. Percent who want use limits to reduce, freeze, or increase use among those who support a permit system. 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% "increase substantially" or "slightly" "freeze" or "reduce" 100°1 Although most groups do not support a peg unit system (see Figure 14-1), those who favor limits prefer to freeze or reduce use levels (with over 80% in these two categories); for landowners, drift guides, and scenic guides, percentages in these categories is over 90 Re eaf:f rl i aFor H n S 11 ns Opinion toward a daily boat registration program Respondents were asked about a "daily boat registration" program., as described below. A similar system has operated on Oregon's Deschutes River for the past five years; it has substantially redistributed use away from high use days (Mottl, 2009). Responses for boating groups are given in Table 14-1. Some rivers require boaters to register every time they go boating. "Mandatory registration" could be developed for some segments of the Kenai, with the following characteristics: boaters could register by phone or via the internet boaters would identify which segment they intended to use the number of boats that can register would not be limited a webpage would keep a "running tally" of registered boats for every segment and day Do you think a mandatory registration program should be developed for the Kenai? (Check all that apply) Table 14.1. Percent responding to statements about a boater registration program. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which I oppose). No, this will cost too much to administer. Maybe, but it depends on how easy it is to register. Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which I support). Drift anglers 26 17 Powerboat Drift Powerboat anglers guides guides 15 12 39 may 28 14 5 26 13 13 21 44 26 7 7 Findings include: Most respondents in all groups oppose the program; among boaters, only 20% of drift anglers and 9% of powerboat anglers thought this should be implemented. The only group that showed much support was drift guides (and support was qualified). The most common objections to registration programs are the mandatory requirement, concern that it could lead to use limits, and perceived difficulty to enforce and administer. Very few respondents said they would use information about the number of other trips to decide where and when they use the river, which is the chief benefit of the program. This system is unlikely to gain support from stakeholders or the public, and benefits might be marginal on the Kenai if it did not help redistribute use. Page 112 Kenai Recreat n Study, Ma'or Findings gs and in icat ons Opinion toward parking time limits Respondents were asked about parking time limits at day use areas, which offer an indirect way of handling demand higher than capacity (by limiting trip lengths, thus cycling more people through the area). This is an issue during peak red salmon season. Question wording is given below; results for different groups are given in Table 14 -2. Parking length limits at day use areas on the Lower and Middle River range from 4 to 12 hours (and some only apply during the late red salmon run). Do you support time limits to increase 'turnover' during high use periods? (Circle one number) 1. No, day use parking should not have limits. 2. Yes, day use parking should have some limits. 3. Yes, and different lots should have different limits (depends on the site and its popularity). 4. This issue doesn't matter to me. If you think there should be some parking length limits, what is the most appropriate limit? hours per visit Table 14.2. Percent of responses related to day use parking length limits. Ail users Yes, day use parking should have some limits. 21 Percent 8 hours or less This issue doesn't matter to me. October 2010 21 42 Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides 18 31 62 18 36 29 16 28 38 Findings include: All users show more opposition (43 than support (37 with 21% reporting "this issue doesn't matter" to them. There were small differences between user groups. Powerboat guides showed the strongest opposition, with 50% opposed, 22% support, and 28% "doesn't matter." Drift guides were more positive, with 23% opposed, 41% support, and 26% "doesn't matter." For those who identified a preferred limit, the average among users and guides was about 12 hours, and less than half thought limits should be 8 hours or Tess. The average among landowners was 10 hours. Survey data indicates average trip lengths are well under 8 hours, so limits between 10 and 12 hours are unlikely to induce substantial changeover (and they would probably reduce the quality of the few trips that are longer). Page 113 Specific use limit actions Lower River Figure 14 -4 shows support for specific use limit actions on the Lower River (from focus groups and discussions with agencies and stakeholders). Details for groups are provided in the supplemental report. Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides All anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides Kenai Rec eon Study F.Aaior Findirt s and Impl catni l s 17% 15% Limit of guide 18% boats per day in July 12% 12% 28% 83% 71% Limit of guides in general 65% 60% 53% 67% 63% 65% 19% 19% 20% 12% 14% 28% 12% 48% 36% 29% 53% 72% 70% 76% 75% 58% 60% 68% 79% 72% 36% 36% 18% Limit number of 22% all boats in July 30% 30% Limit boats in July 32% by odd /even 18% registration 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 14-4. Percent support for use limit actions on the Lower River for different groups. Findings include: Most user groups and landowners support limiting guide boats per day or the number of guides in general, with less than 20% opposed. The exception was guided anglers, where about half support limits and 28 %•are opposed. These are nearly identical. to 1992 findings, suggesting that attitudes toward guide limits are stable. In contrast, most guides oppose these types of limits (with powerboat guides more strongly opposed). About one third of drift guides support limits on guides. Most groups oppose per day limits on all powerboat use (guided and unguided), with powerboat anglers, guides, and landowners more strongly opposed. Bank anglers generally support limits on guides, were divided on limiting all boats, and opposed limiting boats on alternating days by odd /even registration numbers. Compared to other groups, bank anglers were slightly more likely to choose "neutral" responses, because these actions generally have fewer effects on their use. Taken together, results suggest that most groups respond to use limit actions consistent with their self-interest. For example, most unguided users support limits that would reduce guide use without restricting their own access, and most guides oppose actions that would limit themselves. For actions that might limit all users, no group showed majority support. Chapter 15 provides additional insight into attitudes related to guided and unguided use issues. October 2010 Page 114 nai R Specific use limit actions Middle River Figure 14 -5 shows percentages supporting specific Middle River use limit actions (developed from focus groups and discussions with agencies and stakeholders). User group details are provided in the supplemental report. All users Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides All users Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides eficIMig Frt 46% 51 39 34% 32 13% 20% 19% 33% 40% 31% 34% 41% 53% 63% 57% 70% 64% 64% 60% 74% 65% 28% 29% 14% 19% Limit number of 22% all boats per day 27% 29% Require camp reservations 58% 3 day campsite limit 43% Limit of guide boats per day 84% Limit of guides in general 84% 75% 62% 56% 65% 60% 56% 51% 49% 1n0% 8O% 60% 32% 27% 22% 13% 26% 24% 16% 14% 26% 17% 23% 15% 15% 4n% 20% l din s and 1111 i caUUon n% 3% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support Figure 14 -5. Percent support for use limit actions on the Middle River for different groups. Findings include: Users and landowners are divided over reservations, but there is more support for a three day limit. Powerboat guides were more likely to oppose both measures, and drift guides were more likely to support them. As with the Lower River, most user groups and landowners support limiting guide boats per day or the number of guides in general, while most guides oppose these limits (with powerboat guides more strongly opposed). User and landowner support for guide Iimits (either option) are lower than for the Lower River, which is consistent with the lower use, crowding ratings, and impact levels on the Middle River. Most groups oppose per day limits on all powerboat use (guided and unguided), with powerboat anglers, guides, and landowners more strongly opposed. As with the Lower River, "reasonable self-interest" provides the best explanation for results. Users generally support guide limits that reduce use without restricting their own access, while guides generally oppose actions that would limit themselves. October 2010 Page 115 Kenai Re to u o Findin Specific use Limit actions Upper River Figure 14-6 shows percentages that support Upper River camp reservations and a limit on the number of all boats (developed from focus groups and discussions with agencies and stakeholders). The Upper River has limits on the total number of guides and "guided starts" per week from the Russian River to Skilak Lake. Powerboat use is generally not allowed on the Upper River, but some powerboat anglers (79) and powerboat guides (28) answered these questions because they take trips on the Upper River. More group information is provided in the supplemental report. Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided users Guided users flrift guides Powerboat guides vex 43% 30% 46% 27% 31% 48% 42% 53% 36% 60% 23% 52% 28% 15% 53% 31% Require camp reservations 31% 67% 26% Limit number of all boats per day 74% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% strongly or slightly oppose slightly or strongy support 80% 100% Figure 14 -6. Percent support for use limit actions on the Upper River for different groups. Findings include: 6 Groups are divided over reservations for on -river camps. Most drift anglers and drift guides (the primary group with access to these camps) support camp reservations, but bank anglers were divided, and powerboat users and guides are opposed. A There were no statistically significant differences between guided and unguided users for "require camp reservations," so those two groups were not shown. As with other segments, no group supports limits on all boats except drift guides (who are already limited). This is consistent with "reasonable self interest" and equity concerns. October 2010 Page 116 Kama Recreation Lower River boat capacities Estimating boat and guide boat capacities In the section about the Lower River, respondents were asked: indn s €ca Capacities refer to a number on a use level scale. On some rivers users and stakeholders are well- calibrated to use levels and have opinions about "how many is too many We were interested in assessing this for the Kenai, focusing on: 1) number of all boats on the Lower River; 2) the number of guide boats on the Lower River; and 3) the number of all boats on the Upper River (Sportsman's to Jim's Landing). Specific questions and findings are given below. In recent years, Lower River counts indicate the number of boats at one time during prime hours in July are... Typically 200 to 300 boats early in the month Typically 300 to 400 boats later in the month May exceed 450 boats a few days each year (usually Tuesdays and Saturdays later in the month) Were generally lower in 2009 due to low king returns; few counts exceeded 300 boats Counts include boats that are fishing and traveling on the river Counts refer to 16 miles of river from Warren Ames Bridge (mile 5) to Sterling Hwy Bridge (mile 21) Because boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, people may encounter fewer boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but 1 don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. (Circle one number per row; if you checked "no" responses, leave blank) On higher use days (such as 100 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000 1,500 Other; Tues and Sat in late July) October 2010 Page 117 Table 14-3 shows responses among users, landowners, and guides. Findings include: e The proportion responding to the series of questions was 42% for all users, 66% for landowners, and 67% for guides, reflecting use of the Lower River and interest in the issue. For all groups, only about one -fifth of those who answered provided capacity estimates, so estimates should only be considered a "starting point" for discussion. Most users and landowners identified three main reasons for not estimating a capacity: 1) they weren't sure they could; 2) they were concerned that estimates might be used to limit boats (which they oppose); or 3) capacities depend on how boats are distributed. Among those willing to make estimates, there are some interesting findings: a Most estimated capacities no higher than typical high use levels at the end of July (about 400 boats). Although use did not reach those levels in 2009, it has exceeded this on some days in other years. Results suggest that current peaks may compromise experiences. o Average capacity estimates were about 250 to 300 boats for users and landowners, which is similar to the "rule of thumb" capacity estimates from crowding ratings (Chapter 6). o Guides on average reported higher capacity estimates than users (about 400 vs. 250 -300); they may be less sensitive to crowding impacts or targeting a higher capacity to reduce the chance of lost access if a capacity were implemented). a Differences between capacities on high vs. low use days were small, suggesting such distinctions are less important. Table 14 -3. Percent of responses related to Lower River boat capacities. Percent of those willing to provide capacity estimate No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this High use days in July (average Other days in October 2010 Kenai R n Study n ns my (average) M.a i:. All users 18 23 8 31 278 243 Landowners 7 30 33 270 272 Guides 22 27 23 23 412 385 Page 118 Kena Rect 'o Lower River guide boat capacities C cr' indin ons Parallel questions asked about guide boat capacities on the Lower River (see below): The peak number of guide boats on the Lower River at one time during "guide hours" (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesday through Saturday) has varied over the years. In recent years in July, there are typically 100 to 150, with some peaks about 200. There are lower numbers in other months. Because guided boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, boaters may encounter fewer guided boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable guide capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of guided boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a "guided boat capacity estimate" for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, I object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats Li No, it depends on how guided boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit guided boats, which I oppose No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me Li No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of guided boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the maximum number of guided boats that should be on the Lower River at one time. (Circle one number per row. if you checked any of the "no" responses, leave this question blank). In July 50 100 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 Other: Table 14-4 (next page) shows responses among users, landowners, and guides for these questions. Findings include: The proportion responding to this series of questions was 42% among all users, 65% for landowners, and 56% for guides, reflecting use of the Lower River and interest in the issue. Among respondents, 17% of the users, 31% of landowners and 16% of guides provided numerical capacity estimates, so they are only a "starting point" for discussion. Reasons for not providing an estimate among users were similar to those for "total boat capacities" (see above). However, 46% of the guides object to identifying a capacity for guide boats. This is consistent with their complaint that guides have been "singled out" to solve the Kenai's overuse problems. Among those willing to estimate a number: o Most estimated capacities no higher than "typical" high use levels at the end of July (about 150 guide boats). Although use levels did not reach those levels in 2009, it has exceeded this on several days in previous years. As with total boat capacity estimates, current peaks may compromise experiences. o Average capacity estimates were about 130 guide boats for users, but over 200 for guides, consistent with guides' higher tolerances for crowding impacts and lower support for use limits. o Differences between capacities on high vs. low use days were small, suggesting such distinctions are less important. October 2010 Page 119 Table 14 -4. Percent of responses related to Lower River guide boat capacities. Percent of those willing to provide capacity estimate No, it's too complicated Kenai RecreaCo No, l object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish who estimated 150 or less who estimated 150 or less Major Fns n ations All users 27 12 12 80 83 Landowners 31 13 8 4 Guides 16 46 34 6 79 89 55 67 October 2010 Page 120 Ken R rea tub n n hoh ons Upper River boat capacities Parallel questions asked about boat capacities on the Upper River from Sportsman's to Jim's Landing, the highest use segment (see below): O doher 2010 Upper River boating counts have increased in recent years. For 2004, the latest year with accurate data, the number of boats passing the ferry per day in the fishing season... averaged about 60 boats per day on weekdays averages about 100 boats per day on weekends peaked over 200 boats per day on high use weekends (during red salmon runs) guided use is already limited on this segment, and typically ranges from 15 to 20 boats per day Because everyone travels downstream, there are multiple channels, and there are many daylight hours, people may encounter many fewer boats than these "per day" counts, However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable boat capacity estimate" for the Upper River the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Upper River (specifically from Sportsman's Landing to Jim's Landing)? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this LI No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" on the Sportsman's to Jim's Landing segment the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. ((f you checked any of the "no" responses above, leave this question blank). During red salmon runs 50 75 100 150 200 250 300 400 Other: Table 14 -5 (next page) shows responses for these questions. Findings include: The proportion responding to these questions was 58% for all users, 41% for landowners, and 31% for guides. Fewer in these latter two groups use the Upper River (guides are limited, there is less private land, and powerboats are prohibited). Among respondents, 18% of all users, :16% of landowners, and 46% of guides estimated capacities, so estimates are only a "starting point" for discussion. The high proportion of guides makes sense given that they are already limited (and probably have greater interest in limits on other users that wouldn not affect them). Among users, reasons for not providing an estimate were similar to those for the Lower River {see above): 1) they weren't sure they could; 2) capacities depend on how boats are distributed; and 3) they were concerned that estimates might be used to limit boats {which they oppose). Among those willing to estimate a capacity, findings include: o Most estimated capacities lower than 150 for red runs, much lower than existing peaks that may reach 200 per day. As with Lower River capacity estimates {and consistent with crowding and impact information from Chapter 6), existing peaks may compromise experiences. Page 121 o Average capacity estimates for red runs were about 160 boats for users, and 110 for guides. In contrast to the Lower River, users (rather than guides) may worry about losing access if use was limited (because guided use is already limited). o Average capacity estimates on days outside the red runs were lower than 100, suggesting different capacities during and outside the red runs. Table 14-5. Percent of responses related to Upper River boat capacities. Percent of those willing to provide capacity estimate No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, I care about the number of boats, butt don't know how to estimate this Mom. During red runs (average) During other times (average) Other comments on use limit actions October 2010 Kenai Recreation 't. y? Major Findin s and_ o All users 18 22 10 36 157 150 Landowners 16 26 Guides 10 46 20 12 34 elW 118 21 106 89 86 Taken together, findings show that most Kenai users, landowners, and guides are not enthusiastic about use limits that might restrict their own access, but many support limits that might reduce someone else's use. Users and landowners were particularly supportive of limits on guide boats or number of guides, while guides support limits on unguided boats on the Upper River (where guides are already limited). Other results are broadly consistent with findings that show some times and segments have high use levels and associated impacts. Even though many respondents were unwilling to estimate capacities, those with an opinion typically estimated capacities lower than current peaks. This is relevant for long -terra planning because recreation use levels on the Kenai are unlikely to stabilize on their own. State, southcentral Alaska, and Kenai Peninsula populations will likely increase over the next two decades (a typical planning horizon for resource management plans), as will tourism -based visitation. Given the number of undeveloped residential lots on the river and the increase in retirees from the "baby boom" demographic, increased local use is another reasonable prediction. The likely result is increasing average and peak use levels which, left unmanaged, could translate into higher impacts and changed recreation experiences. Page 122 K RecreaV dv, Majciry4 di g 'c Some suggest that use increases are not inevitable and may "self regulate," particularly if those sensitive to higher use or impacts reduce or stop their river use. This study suggests some displacement and "product shifts" are already occurring (see Chapter 9), but it is unclear whether this will displace enough use to prevent increases. More importantly, "self regulation" of this sort creates interim degraded conditions (the "stagnation and decline" components of the classic "tourism life cycle" (Butler, 1980; Miller and Gallucci, 2004). It is also possible that stable or declining fishing participation trends in the United States (USFWS, 2006) or Alaska (Romberg, 2006) may counter population or visitation increases. However, we doubt that these trends will apply to accessible streams in southcentral Alaska, or a river as popular as the Kenai. Research suggests the factors affecting fishing participation are complex (Aas, 1 995; .Fedler and Dillon, 2001; Romberg, 2006), and specific forecasts for the Kenai are beyond the scope of this study. But we are skeptical that Kenai angling -based use will stabilize or substantially decline due to national participation trends. A review of previous years use data suggests that Kenai angling use is affected by salmon fishery strength (low use in years with poor king or red runs) or regulation changes (e.g., personal use fishery has reduced rod and reel red fishing during the second run). But over the long term, the number and variety of users fishing, boating, or camping along the Kenai has generally increased with the Kenai Peninsula and southcentral Alaska population. If use limits are eventually contemplated, it will be important to choose a capacity through a transparent process with public and stakeholder input. The survey provides a starting point for discussion, but a greater proportion of users will need to become calibrated to use levels to effectively debate "how much is too much." Without advocating for a process to define capacities on the Kenai, we note that capacity decisions are generally less contentious if they can be made before use approaches the levels under consideration and cutting back use is usually politically challenging. The Kenai may be past that point for some segments and seasons, but there are other segments and seasons where capacities are not exceeded now, but could be at risk in the near future (e.g., a typical planning horizon of 20 years). The sooner agencies explore this issue, the better the chance of developing consensus about the Level of use the river should sustain and be managed for. It is difficult to manage what you can't measure and discuss, so better information is a necessary step. Toward this end, we have made some use monitoring recommendations for river segments and seasons likely to receive management attention in the future (see list at the end of this chapter). Measured systematically and posted online, they could become useful information for anglers and stakeholders when planning their trips or evaluating what they experienced. In the same way that published sonar counts (even within an unknown level of imprecision) provide anglers with a metric to associate with fishing success and biological management goals, published use information could improve the debate about appropriate use and impact levels. In the meantime, there is little support for "fully implemented" use limits (e.g., permit systems that limit people, boats, or camping groups per day). Nonetheless, there are other ways to indirectly influence use levels. For example, limiting parking spaces at bank angling access points constrains the number of bank anglers in an area like a State Park unit or the shore accessible by the Russian River Ferry. This is the primary management tool in place at several Upper and Middle River locations, many of which have fee parking and defined spaces. However, several of those sites probably allow too many vehicles when they are completely full, especially because anecdotal evidence suggests many anglers have learned to carpool or even take taxis to the parking lots, essentially increasing the people per parking space. To be effective, more explicit decisions about capacities are needed. Angler proximity standards, estimates of anglers per vehicle, and measurements of accessible shoreline for fishing can all help with this task for specific areas. October 2010 Page 123 Ke Recreation d F €ndi n pflcat ons Another indirect use limit focuses on redistributing use through information. As discussed in Chapter 6, this strategy is less likely to be effective with powerboat anglers targeting kings, who may concentrate their use despite crowding or related impacts. But many other anglers may appreciate information about use levels, and may adjust their trips to avoid peak days and segments. Publicized use information has redistributed use information on Oregon's Deschutes River, and this might work to some extent on the Kenai as well. Finally, limiting guided use is a common strategy on many rivers. This has been adopted on the Upper River and has been advocated by some unguided users and stakeholder groups for the Lower and Middle River. But limiting guides at (for example) current use levels will not stop growth if non- guided use continues to increase. The next chapter covers guided /unguided issues in greater detail. Direct use Limits (e.g., permit systems) involve trade -offs, including greater regimentation and administrative costs (Brunson et al., 1992). There are also choices about allocating use among different groups (e.g., commercial vs. non- commercial users, motorized vs. non motorized users) and rationing method to use (e.g., reservations, lotteries, first come /first- served). Information in the research literature explore use limit options (Shelby Danley, 1980; Shelby et al., 1982; Shelby, Whittaker Danley, 1989; EDAW, 1995; Whittaker and Shelby, 2008). Recommended use level monitoring The following use level data can be collected efficiently and provide indicators of use related impacts on the Kenai. Sane are already being collected, although others would require some investment. While it is beyond the scope of this study to estimates the costs of additional information collection efforts or distribution of that information, we believe there are opportunities for agency cost sharing and integration, as well as potential private or NGO sponsorship. In all cases, it is important to make the information accessible in "near real time" (e.g., within a day or two on a website) so users can become "calibrated" to what they experienced or better plan future trips. Done well, we think this information will be appreciated by users, and an attraction that angling and boating websites would like to help publish. Lower River Collect and post daily during June and July and on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from August 1 through September 15. Highest at one time ADF &G boat count for the entire Lower River on days when counts are conducted. Information should include all boats counted (not just those fishing), but should distinguish guided and unguided counts. These data are already being collected and "instantly" submitted electronically to ADF &G staff but they are not generally publicized. On ADF &G's non counting days in July, consider contracting a single at- one time count between about 8 and 10 am (the typical highest use period) using the same ADF &G protocols. This would provide a count for every day in the month. For August and early September, conduct at- one -time counts using A.DF &G protocols on the four days per week schedule. Middle River Collect and post on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from the start of the second red run (roughly July 10) through September: October 20'10 Page 124 Upper River Ke ai R r o Study Major ld ns and kripjjcaudns Boats Launching from Bing's Landing. This is available from fee information, but is not systematically tallied by day. Boat trailers parked at Lower Skilak (at one time count between 2 and 4 pm). This would require new data collection. It might be contracted with shuttle drivers or guides who use the ramp most days. Collect and post daily during red runs (roughly June 10 to June 30; July 15 to Aug 10) and on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays through September 30: Boats launching from Cooper Landing per day. This is available from fee information, but not systematically tallied by day. Boats launching from Sportsman's per clay. This is already available from USFWS concessionaires, but it is not published until the end of the season. a Ferry passengers per day. Trailer count at Jim's Landing and across highway parking (at one time count between 2 and 4 pm). This would require new data collection, but might be contracted with guides or shuttle drivers who use the ramp most days. For all data, it is important to develop clear protocols for counting methods. Once collected, data need to be made publieally available in user friendly form, thereby helping users develop better "calibration" between use levels and their experiences. As with other (e.g., ADF &G) Kenai data, quality control is important so those responsible for collecting, tabulating, or reporting /posting information need to be well- trained and conscientious. October 2010 Page 125 a Stud a or n1.gs and p n Statements about guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers d d PI SW1...I Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides 100% 15. Guided /Unguided Use Issues This chapter provides information from the follow -up survey about attitudes toward guide /unguided use issues. It, focuses on responses to 12 statements about guides, unguided users, and resolving conflicts between them (on a 5 point agree- disagree scale, with a neutral option). The statements were developed from focus group comments about issues each group has with the other, reviewed by agencies and stakeholders to reduce bias. The chapter concludes with other differences between guided and unguided users and comments about addressing guided/unguided conflicts or limits. Respondents were asked whether they agree or disagree with the following statements about guides or guided use: The total number of guided boats can detract from experiences. Some guides tend to be "more aggressive" (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). Aside from other issues, some people are envious that guided anglers catch more fish. Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides, IRVREAMAII 4 35:34 7 anito "As RWEIM ririZa WtAIrwse KaiMiNAMIAN MASNRTZAKI 66% 69°! 74% 83% 77% Total number of guided boats can detract Some guides are more aggressive Aside from other issues, some are envious that guided anglers catch more fish Problems due to a few individual guides 80% 60% 27% 26% 35% 31% 37% 2 37% 37% 40% 9% 15% 10% 7% 7% 20% 13% 15% 24% 1 5% strongly or slightly disagree 20% 0% 20% 36% 30% 38% 32% 28 °/o 40% 45% 44n 60% 76% 78% 83% 90 87% 74% 77% 76% 74% 74% 75% 71% 83% 80% slightly or strongy agree Figure 15-1. Percent agree /disagree with common statements about guided use. 87% 0 6 100% October 2010 Page 126 Kena& R on Study car 1 i n tK)ns Statements about unguided users Figure 15 -1 provides results for different groups. Findings include: Most respondents in all groups except powerboat guides agree that the number of guided boats can detract from trips. This fits with other findings showing there are segments and seasons when use and impacts too high, but further suggesting guided use is part of the problem for many users (and even some guides). Group differences on "the number of guide boats detract" make sense; unguided users were more likely to agree. In addition, drift or bank anglers were less likely to agree, probably because they are more likely to use the Upper River (where guide boats are already limited). Sixty -nine to 90% of all groups agree that some guides can be "aggressive" on the river, and responses are highly correlated with "the number of guides can detract" (r =0.67, p<.001). The 1992 study discussed this issue (Whittaker and Shelby 1993), noting that guides have at the least a "serious public relations problem." These data suggest that problem has not gone away, although 2009 data do not quantify the amount aggressive behavior or the proportion of guides who engage in it. The Kenai Guide Academy initiative (a week -long course all guides are required to complete) has probably helped improve guide etiquette, but it seems clear that some guides continue practices that others resent. Users and landowners were divided over whether "envy" about higher guided catch rates helps explain antipathy toward guided use, although 74 to 77% of guides agree with this statement. ADF &G has reported striking differences in catch -rates per hour of effort between guided and unguided anglers in some years (ADF &G, 2009), but "catch -rate envy" is not widespread (or at least not reported) among the users presumed to possess it. Seventy -one to 96% of all groups agree that most guided use problems are caused by a few individual guides, but this was not correlated (r =0.05, p =.254) with concern about some guides' aggressive behavior. As discussed in the 1992 study, guides themselves are in the best position to identify and "sanction" fellow guides who practice aggressive behavior, and "failure to take up this challenge will probably increase the call for further guide restrictions." Even so, the perception among users is that aggressive behavior from guides is more widespread than "a few individuals." Respondents were asked to agree or disagree with the following statements about unguided use: Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat equipment to fish in higher density areas. Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as drifting when others are back trolling or vice versa). Some unguided users don't know the "rules" for driving on the river and create safety hazards. Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. October 2010 Page 127 Kenn Re Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides e n oavagglAVONS FINESZSMEM OlVailafklEgf 64% 12% 16% Some unguided users 21% don't have appropriate 16% equipment/boats for 21% high density areas Some unguided users disrupt fishing with inappropriate techniques Some unguided users don't know "rules of the road" 9% 10% 5% 7% 10% 7% Problems due to a few 11% individual unguided users 9% 7% 21% 7% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% strongly or slightly disagree ajor Findin s and f€ pfica io s 3% 50% 62% 59% 58% 51% 69% 64% 67% 68% 58% 70% 81% 5% 73% 71% 69% 66% 77% 82% 74% 76% 82% 77% 76% 81% Figure 15-2. Percent agree/disagree with common statements about unguided use. 88% 88% 9 6% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% slightly or strongy agree Figure 15 -2 provides results for different groups; findings include: Most boating users agree that some unguided users lack the appropriate equipment or boats to fish in high density situations, and even more agree that some unguided users don't know the "rules of the road." Responses to the two statements were also correlated (r =0.64, p<.001). Guides agree with these statements more strongly still, confirming focus group discussion that this is a major source of friction from the guide perspective. It is not surprising that some unguided users have less river running knowledge (or less capable boats /equipment) than guides, but widespread recognition of the problem provides support for increased boater safety education or regulations Most users and an even more guides agree that some unguided users disrupt others by using inappropriate fishing techniques. Responses to this statement were also highly correlated with "unguided users don't have appropriate boats /equipment" (r =0.69, p <.001) and "unguided users don't know rules of the road" (r=0.77, p <.001). Taken together, these findings imply that interference impacts can be reduced if more users improve their boats /equipment, learn to drive better, and fish in sync with others. Education efforts that encourage this are likely to receive support from both sides. Majorities (64 to 82 of alI groups agree that most unguided use problems stem from behavior of a few individuals, an analogous finding to the parallel question about guides. However, responses to this statement were only weakly correlated with others related to unguided use (r 0.13). Identifying and improving that behavior through education or regulation would garner support from both groups. October 2010 Page 128 Statements about other guided /unguided use issues Respondents were asked to agree or disagree with four additional statements about guides or guided use: No one group is the problem, everyone needs to share the burden of reducing impacts. The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to the group that is causing the impacts. Limiting guided use is a good way to reduce overall use. Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. All users Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides All users Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides All users Landowners Unguided anglers Guided anglers Drift guides Powerboat guides fications LIEICER atignm I 16% 73% 83% Everyone should share burden of reducing impacts The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to group causing them Limiting guided use is a good way to reduce overall use 48% 73% 71% 100% 80% 65% 65% 54° 28% 31% 27% 37% 43% 5 °,1° 60% 40% 18% 13% 4% 6% 7% 7% 7% 9% 6% 13% 22% 20% 0% strongly or slightly disagree 14% 14% 14% 21% 24% Local economic benefits from guided use are 39% more important than overuse 4 issues 29% 38% 50% 51% 55% 73% 78% 72% 75% 69% 67% 75% 70% 91 87% 87% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% slightly or strongy agree Figure 15-3. Percent agree /disagree with other statements about guided- unguided use issues. Figure 15 -3 provides results for different groups; findings include: Large majorities (73 to 91 of all groups agree that "everyone should share the burden of reducing impacts." This proportion drops substantially for powerboat guides (to 50 for the statement "the burden... should be proportional to the groups causing the impacts," probably reflecting concern that guided use will be limited more than others. Nonetheless, there is conceptual agreement that reducing impacts is important and should be shared. Differences between the two groups become more apparent regarding the concept of limiting guides to address overuse, and responses are consistent with rational self- interest. Limiting guides would reduce use and impacts at no cost to unguided users, and 70% support it, while guides see lost access for their group only. Guided users are more divided, but more disagree than agree (48% to 3 8 October 20'1 0 Page 129 Kenai R c n r Et1!n s and taons Other differences between guided unguided users Other information about guided use Some of these differences are similar for the statement about local economic impacts from guided use being more important than overuse issues. Most users (particularly unguided users and landowners) do not think economic benefits "trump" overuse issues. This is also a rational position, as most would experience better conditions with few direct effects on their own situation. In contrast, guides are more divided, with powerboat guides more likely to agree than driftboat guides. Additional analysis explored other issues. Findings include: A model predicting agreement with "limiting guided use is a good way to reduce overall use" (R can be improved with other variables, but frequency of guided trips is still the biggest predictor: Frequency of guided trips (r=- 0.31); less guided use more agreement on limiting guides. Quality of trips over the years (r= 0.31); more decline more agreement on limiting guides. Support for use limits in general (r= 0.15); more support -3 more agreement on limiting guides. Quality of management over the years (r=- 0.11); less improvement in management -3 more agreement on limiting guides. a The frequency of guided use was significantly correlated with many other variables, but mostly at low levels (e.g., less than 0.20). Those with higher correlations include: Guided users reported less crowding, r- -0.20. Unguided users have reduced /stopped use of some segments more often, r- -0.20. Unguided users support limiting guided boats on Lower River in July more, r= -0.32 Unguided users support limiting total guides on Lower .River more, r= -0.31 Unguided users support guide limits per day on Middle River more, r= -0.23 i Unguided users support limiting the number of guides (in general) more, r- -Y -.25 There are many ways to assess the amount of guided use, its contribution to overall use levels, and whether limiting guides or guide boats per day would be effective. In addition to information in Chapter 3 on use levels, we have assembled several graphs that approach the issue in different ways. Figure 15 -4 shows the number of commercial operator permits on the Kenai from 1982 to the present (from State Parks data base). The figure shows the number of powerboat guides, drift guides, non fishing guides, fishing guides, and total guides. Note that some categories can overlap (a non- fishing guide could also be counted in the drift guide total). A companion figure (Figure 15 -5) uses the same data to project guide numbers out to 2020, assuming long -term trends remain the same. Findings include: The total number of commercial operators is largely driven by the number of powerboat fishing guides. Powerboat guides make up 80 to 85 percent of all guides in recent years, and fishing guides make up 88 to 93% of all guides. Powerboat guides have increased over the long term, although there have been fluctuations for short periods and the last two years have been down (the 322 in 2009 was about 1 lower than the highest peak at 372 in 2007). A continued poor national economy and projected weak salmon runs appears likely to reduce this further in 2010. Another 6 to 7% drop would put powerboat guide numbers around 300, the 2000 -04 level. (Note: October 2010 data from State Parks suggests powerboat guides have dropped to exactly 300). The number of drift guides has been about 60 to 80 over the past 25 years, and remains at 62 in 2010. October 2010 Page 130 500 400 300 200 100 October 2010 Kena Recre dinas and Ei plica ions Number of guides The number of non fishing operators (including boat rentals, shuttle operators, guided kayak tours on the lakes, and a horseback guide) has increased over the years, although at a slightly lower rate than powerboat guides. Applying long -term trends (using linear regression inherent in the graphics software program) to ht the historical guide numbers (Figure 15 -5), the total number of commercial operations could approach 500 by 2020, of which about 470 would be fishing guides. Powerboat guides would approach 450, drift -based guides would slightly decline to 65, and non fishing guides increase to about 60. These projections are meant to be simple illustrations of the long -term trend. Actual increases of this magnitude are unlikely to occur on that schedule given the reductions in last couple of years, but if the economy and fisheries rebound, we expect the long -term increasing trend to reestablish itself. All commerical operators Powerboat guides AEI fi$kxin 7 guides Drift guides Non fishing guides 0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Figure 15.4. Number of commercial operators by category,1982 -2009 (from State Parks). Page 131 500 400 300 200 100 Kenai Rec t o $u ri Mgjor i Number of guides Projected: If trends continue... 0 1_ l 1... l I 1 I 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Figure 15 -5. Historical trends for number of commercial operators by category (from State Parks) Octob i 2010 Page 132 Tue 19 2 ®g Tue 26 Sat 30 Tue 18 2006 Tue 25 Sat 29 Tue 17 2007 Sat 21 Sat 28 Tue 31 Sat 19 2008 Fri 25 Sat 26 Tue 29 Sat 18 2009 Wed 25 Tue 28 Recreation an s catcm 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Percent guided The total number of guides may not be the best indicator of guided use levels on any segment or day, which is probably more important for management. Discussion about guide limits often focuses on the Lower River during July, when both kings and reds attract high use. ADF &G counts show that guided use makes up about 65% of at- one -time use when both guided and unguided users are on the river (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesdays through Saturdays). Does that proportion hold on highest use days (the days more likely to be "over capacity" and likely target for use limits on guides or all boaters)? Figure 15 -6 shows the total number of boats during the four highest counts for each of the past five years, as well as the proportion of guided use during those counts. 65% 5 64% 59% 69% 70% 52% 55% 59% 62% 5r 0 52 53% 59% 55% 55% 54% 49% L.$1 ...4.4eal1EMMAIS517,45Eittin EITOREALMISIMMISMItiattafinMEItin 451 382 440 358 497 412 425 479 455 416 465 341 419 386 427 341 340 304 534 11 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Total boat count Figure 15.6, Total Lower River boat counts and percent of boats that were guided on high use days in July, 2005 -2009. Findings include: As discussed in Chapter 3, Lower River boating levels on high use days were higher from 2005 -07 than in the past two years. High use in 2009 was generally less than 350 boats, while it commonly exceeded 400 to 450 in previous years. The percent of guided use varies across high use days. On some days it exceeds the July average of 59% (or the full season average of 65 but on most days it is about 50 to 55 Guided use provides the majority of use on high use days, but unguided use is variable and determines how high use will go. m During the 1992 study, there were only 212 total powerboat guides, and the "vile of thumb" estimate was that guided use contributed about one -third of total use on. the Lower River. In recent years, there have been as many as 372 powerboat guides, and the guided contribution is usually greater than 65% during the early king run, about 59% during July, and varies between 50 and 70% on high use days. Similar data is not available for the Middle and Upper River, but most evidence (discussed in Chapter 3) suggests guide proportions are much smaller. On the Upper River, the number of guides and starts per October 2010 Page 133 q -w reatio td's al() s nd guide per week are limited, and 2004 photo data suggests Iess than a third of all boats are guided (with about half of guided trips scenic rather than fishing). On the Middle River, 2004 USFWS interview data from July and October suggest guided use is about 25% and 22% of all boats, respectively. 2009 data suggests this may be increasing to about 31 This may be an area where future monitoring could help identify trends. Residency of guides is often discussed as part of the guided /unguided debate. The proportion of guides with Alaskan residency shows it has varied between 68 and 81% over the years from 1982 to present, with an average of 76% (lowest in the late 1980s, 76% in 2009). Other comments on guided unguided use issues Taken together, preceding information suggests some common ground. Education and regulation that reproves 1) guide etiquette or 2) unguided craft, equipment, skills, and knowledge are likely to be supported by all sides. Similarly, most will support efforts to identify and sanction individual guides or unguided users responsible for problem behaviors. If these programs actually improve behavior on high use days, some friction will be reduced. However, even significantly improved behavior (by guides) or improved skill and equipment (among unguided users) are unlikely to remove the fundamental tension between these groups, particularly on the Lower River during July. Guides are easily identified on the river, they make up the majority of use during "guide hours," they have a majority of clients from out of state, and their numbers have grown in the past two decades. It is not surprising that unguided users support guide limits that won't apply to there. Guides also represent a commercial use, and there is long tradition of restricting commercial recreation uses before all uses in recreation settings (Whittaker and Shelby, 2008). Many guides are aware of this perspective and "push back" to protect their access. Common rebuttals include: 1) guided users are part of the public too; 2) guides offer opportunities to people without skill or equipment; 3) guides are skilled operators that can help establish "best practices" or help with rescues (when needed); 4) specific days guided use produces local economic benefits; 5) guide access is already restricted to (and limited on. the Upper River); and 6) unguided use has also increased over the y ys and hours p° River); years and should be part of any use limit effort. These opposing perspectives will make it challenging to develop consensus opinion about the need for or appropriate level of guided use limits (or all user limits). If agencies contemplate guide limits to meet capacity goals, they should brace for contentious debates and possibly litigation. In these situations, a transparent decision making process and extensive opportunity to engage stakeholders will be important to develop reasonable objectives, apply limits that accomplish those objectives, and treat different groups fairly. To help work through such a process, agencies and stakeholders might consider the following: Guide limits are an issue on the entire river, but not all commercial use is growing and it is possible to target specific segments and seasons (as do Upper River guide limits). The Lower River in July is the most prominent segment/season where guide limits are a major issue, although unguided users support such limits on the Middle River too. Many rivers with substantial commercial use and overuse problems have limited guided use, often without limiting unguided use. But unless one expects all the growth in use to be guided, limits on guides alone will not solve the problem. On the Upper River, for example, limits on guides have probably slowed but not stopped increasing use. October 2010 Page 134 K rrai Recreation Study Maljr F dings and Unless guide limits are substantially lower than current levels, they are unlikely to dramatically reduce use levels. For example, during high use periods on the Lower River (e.g., peak counts over 400 boats per day), guided use may account for 200 to 250 boats, so a 20% reduction in guided use would only remove 40 to 50 boats (probably noticeable, but within current day -to -day variation experienced on the river). Guide limits for the Lower River in July are probably best viewed as a way to slow future growth of the largest use sector. If a freeze on guide numbers had been implemented in the early 1990s (when first proposed), there would be 30 to 40% less guided boats now. The open question is whether this long -term growth trends will continue going forward. Limiting the commercial sector first tends to pre determine a "split allocation approach" if a full system is ever implemented. The advantages and disadvantages of "split allocation" vs. "common pool" approaches are complex and beyond the scope of this document, but these need to be carefully examined. A full discussion of river use allocation issues (not to be confused with fishery allocation) is in Whittaker and. Shelby (2008). Although over 100 rivers in the country have guide limits specified (with many agencies actively managing the number of guides or other components of their use), including several federally managed rivers in Alaska (e.g., Alsek, Gulkana, Upper Kenai, Karluk, Togiak Refuge rivers). The State of Alaska has a shorter history and different guide regulation structure that has focused more on certifying safe operations than regulating the amount of use. Many use limits (including limits on guides alone) on Lower 48 rivers were supported by existing guides who were concerned that rising use was degrading their trips. That support often rested on the assumption that existing guides would retain "grandfather rights" to operate, a legally unanswered question in Alaska. If guide limits are contemplated, consequences will vary depending upon the type of limit (e.g., the total number of guides vs. the number of guide boats for a specific segment or period). In general, limiting overall number of guides is a "broader" action. Many of the Kenai's overuse problems appear on the highest use days, so it makes sense to also target those periods. If a split approach is taken, one major challenge will be to determine an "appropriate" split (which may vary by segment, season, or time of day). Because current use on the Lower and Middle River is unrestricted, a fair assessment of market driven demand is possible for these segments; once use is limited, assessing demand becomes nearly impossible l to v alu e b debates and difficulty developing objectives- based decisions. It is always more challenging to reduce use rather than freeze it; reductions represent loss of income or access, while a freeze only prevents growth. Given that market conditions appear to be driving current guide numbers to roughly 2000 -04 levels, there may be a "window" for an interim freeze to allow agencies, stakeholders, and the public to work through a range of management actions. Such a freeze would protect current guides, which is probably preferable to allowing growth and then deciding that reductions are necessary. October 2010 Page 135 Kenai R t €on Stud This chapter reports responses, from the follow -up survey regarding user, fees. Respondents were asked if they would be willing to pay user fees. Other issues related to fees in river settings are also reviewed. User fees are often used to help offset the costs of managing recreation areas. Various federal agencies have day use, camping, and boat launching fees at facilities across Alaska, although most are not for simple use of the river. On some rivers in the Lower 48 (e.g., Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Oregon's Deschutes, Idaho's Middle Fork and Main Salmon rivers), daily fees above and beyond facility use have been in place for many years and are widely accepted. Opinions about user fees 2009 respondents were asked: Management of the Kenai River (facility maintenance, river patrols, etc.) is currently funded by state and federal budgets. Would you be willing to pay a "user fee' on the Kenai (beyond launch or other facility fees already charged), assuming that all revenues would be returned to help manage the river? no yes How much would you be willing to pay? dollars per day dollars per season 1992 respondents were asked a similar question: 16. User Fees r F d tons Would you be willing to pay a "user fee' on the Kenai if it were used to increase the quality of services provided? The 1992 question was modified because 1) several new facility ices have been introduced since 1992; 2) agencies wanted to clarify that revenues from fees would be used to help manage the river; and 3) fees we wanted to ask about were above and beyond current facility -based fees. Despite these differences, it is useful to compare findings from the two different studies (Table 16-1). Table 16-1. Percent willing to pay user fees and average amounts. Users yes in 2009 Average per day 2009 Average per season 2009 October 2010 All Bank Drift Powerboat Land- Drift Powerboat users anglers anglers anglers owners guides guides 48 6 49 47 5 55 40 7 Note: Average fees in parentheses adjusted for inflation to 2009 dollars. 59 38 5 49 30 48 39 4 107 26 32 Page 136 Other fee considerations na€ B crealo l dirtgs nd.I 'c c s Findings include: Just under half of all users are willing to pay user fees; drift anglers were the only group with a majority reporting a willingness to pay. Powerboat anglers, Iandowners, and powerboat guides were least willing to pay. O Substantially fewer users were willing to pay user fees in 2009 than 1992 (48% vs. 61%). Possible explanations include: 1) The new preamble to the question changes how respondents interpreted the question (in particular, the 1992 question emphasized "improving quality" rather than collecting fees "beyond... facility fees 2) Several new day use fees have been added at State Parks or other recreation facilities on the river since 1992; this may have induced some "fee fatigue" among users. 3) The downturn in the 2009 economy. 4) General anti government or anti -tax sentiment. Of those willing to pay in 2009, average amounts were $5 to 7 per day and $40 to 50 per season. Adjusted for inflation, per day amounts were lower than in 1992 but per season amounts were higher. 2009 differences between drift and powerboat anglers were similar to a study of 1999 Gulkana River users, where there was more willingness to pay among drift anglers (61%) than powerboaters (42 Previous research suggests that fees associated with specific management actions (e.g., litter patrols, facilities development, etc.) are more Iikely to be supported than fees without specific associations (Puttkamer, 2001), which further explains potential differences in the 1992 and 2009 results. When considering fees, planners should recognize that fee collection introduce a larger "management footprint" on trips. Fees may also dampen use levels, a potential way to redistribute use from higher to lower use areas. There is anecdotal evidence that variable launch fees affect use levels at Kenai launches (e.g., and the Deschutes River in Oregon has effectively applied "congestion fees" (higher fees on weekends) to redistribute use from weekends to weekdays. In addition to these direct effects on users, fee programs may also impact future management choices in If user f ees i legislative for subtle ways. If uaci fees lead to lower icgis€a�avc appropriations i�r management, for eXaEiipic, agency revenue streams dependent on higher use levels could lead some agencies to favor higher density opportunities. Agencies might also become more interested in developed opportunities that typically feature higher fees and revenues. Taken together, fee programs run the risk of "commercializing" recreation experiences, with direct, indirect, and sometimes unintended consequences. Fee programs can be an important source of management revenue, but fees may be more appropriate for some situations than others, and deserve consideration beyond the issue of whether people are willing to pay them. Additional information about fees (their history, advantages, disadvantages, and public support for them) is available in an annotated bibliography on the topic (Puttkamer, 2001). October 2010 Page 137 Ken al e l l for Find n s an ip catio s 17. Non Recreation Development Issues This chapter reviews responses from the follow survey about private land development (with a particular focus on the visual impacts of riverside development, which State Parks has some responsibility for). Respondents were asked about current development and permitting requirements. Preferred levels of development Respondents were asked to identify the appropriate level of river front development (e.g., docks and fishing platforms) from a visual perspective. Specific wording for the question follows; it was asked for each of the three segments: Public and private land owners on the Kenai River are currently allowed to develop up to one third of their riverfront property with docks or fishing platforms. For the entire river, at least 12% of the river's banks have been developed. Based on this information and your experience, how much development is appropriate from a visual perspective? (Please check one response for each segment you visit). Development should be reduced Keep it near current levels U Allow it to increase slightly Allow it to increase substantially Allow it to double Allow it to triple Li I'm uncomfortable answering this (please specify why below) If you are uncomfortable estimating an appropriate level of bankside development, check all reasons that apply. (If you identified a development level above, leave this question blank), l� I lust don't know I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount. I care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type location of development. I don't care about visual impacts as long as there is "no net loss" of fish habitat. I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation facilities. Results for all users are given in Figure 17 -1 and Table 17 -1; additional information is in the supplemental report. Findings include: Most users favor current levels of development (about 55 or reductions (about 20 Of those favoring snore development, most prefer slight increases, and less than 5% prefer doubling or tripling development (which current regulations allow). Differences for the three segments were small, suggesting a broader underlying attitude toward development (for most, "don't let development increase Differences between groups were small. a Among those uncomfortable identifying a preferred development level, 36 to 53% said it depends on the type and location of development. Several verbatim comments specified how some development was preferred to bank trampling (see supplemental report). October 2010 Page 138 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Kenai Reno Percent responding I just don't know 1 care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type and location of development. I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount. I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation access facilities. 1 don't care about visual impacts as long as there is no net loss" of fish habitat. 1. Among respondents in each group that identified any reasons. thn a J ko O catio Lower River ®Middle River Upper River Figure 17 -1. Preferred level of bankside development along Kenai River segments among users. Table 17 -1. For those uncomfortable answering development levels, percent identifying reasons. All users All guides Landowners n =459' n =99' n =98' 31 13 14 3V 51 53 27 32 23 10 14 17 13 25 16 October 2010 Page 139 Opinions toward land use regulations and permitting All users Landowners Guides All users Landowners Guides Lion Study NI,ky ica o§ 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% strongly or slightly disagree Two questions asked respondents to agree or disagree on a 5 point scale with general statements about land use regulations and development along the Kenai. Results are shown in Figure 17 -2. In general, permitting requirements for docks, boardwalks, and 31% erosion control structures are too restrictive. In general, existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the river from over development. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% slightly or strongy agree Figure 17-2. Percent agreeldisagree with statements about permitting. 100% Findings include: Fifty -two percent of landowners find permitting requirements too restrictive, while users and guides are more divided. Landowners have first -hand experience with and may be responding to specific permitting requirements, while others may be interpreting the question through a broader perspective about whether restrictions seem fair. Fifty -three to sixty -two percent of all three groups agree that existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the river from overdevelopment, which fits with support for the status quo level of development (reported in Figure 17 -1). October 2010 Page 140 ec ation Study vlap l n 18. Concluding comments The preceding chapters document use and impact levels on the Kenai River and support for management actions that might be used to address them. Taken together, the information supports a common narrative about the Kenai: there are times and places where use and impacts diminish the quality of experiences, and the river is not what it used to be." Results also show considerable support for some actions (particularly facility development and education) to address these problems, but more divided opinion about several regulation options, changes in the type of use (e.g., more drift -only times /segments), or use limits (for guides or all users). Implementing actions with greater support should be possible, contingent on agency budgets. But choosing among actions with less support is likely to be challenging, with extensive stakeholder and public debate. One goal of this report is to inform agencies, stakeholders, and the public about issues in these debates. We also offer the following comments based on our research and planning experience on other rivers and our interpretation of Kenai- specific information from studies in 1992 and 2009: Management on the Kenai River might be characterized as "mature." The river has been popular and heavily used for over five decades, and agencies have been concerned about impacts from that use for at least three of those decades. Along with planning and management activities by local and federal agencies, State- driven planning efforts have produced a comprehensive management plan in 1986 and a revision in 1998. These existing plans provide general direction for addressing overuse problems, as well as constraints on what can be done. It's unlikely that a major overhaul of these plans is needed, and most initiatives can be developed with "step- down" plans or amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan. it is important that new initiatives be considered in a comprehensive manner and coordinated with relevant partner agencies and stakeholders. One can liken this to a doctor's prescription to an aging athlete: the prescription may include exercise, diet, and training advice, in addition to vitamins or drug therapies. But the athlete can't expect high performance unless all the advice is taken; focusing on just one part of the prescription is likely to be ineffective (and possibly harmful). The KRSMA advisory board offers an institutional mechanism for prioritizing and considering initiatives in a comprehensive fashion. The board and its related Guide, Habitat, and River Use Committees have representation from multiple agencies and stakeholders, with a structure for reviewing ideas, considering information, and formulating a reasonable range of management alternatives to address a problem. Agencies could then review and refine alternatives, conduct additional analysis as needed, and present options for public review. Utilizing KRSMA as the initiation point for this process ensures better cross agency and stakeholder coordination. But committees made up of multiple and sometimes opposing groups often have difficulty developing strategies that go beyond the "Least common denominator" (easier actions with consensus support or uncomplicated actions). In our experience, leadership from a lead agency can be crucial in overcoming this disadvantage. The KRSMA board typically meets from fall through spring, and chooses issues through an ad hoc or reactive process. A more systematic prioritization of issues conducted in early fall might help organize the scope of issues they will tackle each year. Study results about issue priorities might provide a useful starting point. Without a commitment to particular issues, it is too simple to "punt" on challenging problems. October 2010 Page 141 ena Recreaton Study 0! Frog§ and Ili F a This study provides considerable information for addressing several issues, but other issues may still not be "ripe" for resolution without continued monitoring or longer -term attention from the public. For example, even if there were support for boating use limits, it is challenging to set a definitive capacity for some segments because data are not reported and is difficult for users to associate use levels with impacts they care about. This study provides information about potential standards for social impact indicators (e.g., perceived crowding, bank angling proximity, boating interference incidents, fishing competition), but broader acceptance of capacities is more likely if users become familiar with the use levels that would start to violate those standards. Developing an efficient but meaningful measure of use, then collecting and publicizing that information is important to educate everyone about use impact relationships. Chapter 14 described the probability of increased use over the long -term and recognition that use may not become "self regulating." Kenai recreation use is a classic "tragedy of the commons" situation, where there are few incentives for individuals or groups to constrain their own growing use, even though the collective impacts will inevitably degrade the resource. The solution to this problem, as discussed in the economics and recreation literature (Hardin, 1968; Shelby Heberlein, 1986; Manning, 2007), is always some variation of "mutual coercion, mutually agreed -upon" collective actions that limit all groups in equitable ways. The history of resource management (whether applied to fish, forests, or recreation use) suggests a "line in the sand" will be needed at some point. If there is not sufficient public interest or political will to define that line now, good management should at least inform agencies, stakeholders, and the public about current conditions, how they may worsen in the future, and what is needed to stabilize or improve them. Ultimately, we hope agencies, stakeholders, and the public use information from this study to make conscious decisions about the kind of recreation opportunities and conditions they want on the Kenai River. The goal should be "management by design" rather than "management by default." Higher density opportunities are not inherently better or worse than lower density ones, but Disneyland is different from wilderness. Obviously the Kenai falls between these two extremes, but more recreation development or regulation may be needed to handle the volume of use if there is no political will to limit use. The challenge is to make deliberate and well informed decisions about "what kind of place the Kenai River will be, and what mix of recreation opportunities it should provide." October 2010 Page 142 nai R Stu for Find n and fmp ratio s 19. Supplemental Report Sections Additional information from the study is provided in a separate electronic report. Sections in that report include: 1. Onsite surveys copies of the survey instruments for drift anglers, powerboat anglers, bank anglers, and non anglers. 2. Follow -up surveys copies of the survey instrument for users, landowners, and guides. 3. Fieldwork notes information from 2009 fieldwork. 4. Focus group notes notes from 8 focus groups used to develop the survey instruments. 5. Use observation forms copies of the use and impact observations forms used to collect information from on the river. 6. 2009 use level information additional graphs and tables from use data provided by other agencies and studies (collected in one place for convenience). 7. Use observation results additional tables with use data for comparisons in future years. 8. Onsite survey results additional tables and analyses for sub groups and segments. 9. Follow -up survey results additional tables and analyses for sub groups and segments. 10. Verbatim comments open ended comments from onsite and follow -up surveys by group and topic. 11. Study technician observations a summary of observations from the Upper River technician, with particular attention to Jim's Landing congestion. issues. 12. Excerpts from Forest Service Report on Upper River bear -human incidents. October 2010 page 143 K a R ecreati 'o d cations 20. References Aas, 0., Haider, W., Hunt, L. 2000. Angler responses to harvest regulations in Engerdal, Norway: A conjoint based choice modeling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20, 940- 950. Adelman, B. J., Heberlein, T. A., Bonnicksen, T. M. 1982. Social psychological explanations for the persistence of a conflict between paddling canoeists and motorcraft users in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Leisure Sciences, 5, 45 -61. Alaska State Parks. 1993. Kenai River Carrying Capacity Study. Final Report. October. Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Anchorage, Alaska. Atcheson, D. 2002, Fishing Alaska's Kenai Peninsula: A complete angler's guide. Backcountry Guides. Woodstock, VT. Brunson, M., B. Shelby, and 3. Goodwin. 1992. Matching impacts with standards in the design of wilderness permit systems. In Standards for Wilderness Management. Pacific Northwest Research Station Gen. Tech. Report #PNW GTR 305, Portland, Oregon. Butler, R.W., The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution. Canadian Geographer, 1980. 24(1): p. 5 -12. Cohen, J. 1994. The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997 -1003. Clark, Roger N. and Stankey, George H. 1979. The recreation opportunity spectrum: A framework for planning, management and research. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest Experiment Station; General Technical Report PNW -98, Portland, OR. Cole, David N. and George H. Stankey. 1998. Historical development of Limits of Acceptable Change: Conceptual clarifications and possible extensions. In: McCool, S.F. and Cole, D.N. and others (Comps.), Proceedings: l ,irni.ts of Acceptable Change and Related Planning Processes: Progress and Future Directions, pp. 5 -9; May 20 -22, 1997, Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rpt. INT- GTR -371. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Cole, David N., Margaret E. Petersen and Robert E. Lucas. 1987. Managing wilderness recreation use: Common problems and potential solutions. USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report INT -230. Ogden, UT. 60 pp. Cordell, H. Ken; Super, Gregory K. 2000. Trends in Americans' outdoor recreation. In: Gartner, William C.; Lime, David W., eds. Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CABI Publishing: 133 -144. Davis, J. 2006. The Environmental Preference of Whitewater Kayakers on Four Southeastern Rivers. In Proceedings from 28th Annual Southeastern Recreation Research (SERR.) Conference. February 26 -28, 2006. Wilmington, North Carolina Dawson, C. and Alberga, K. A. 2003. Acceptable number of user encounters: a study of Adirondack and Great Gulf Wilderness hikers. Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium GTR -NE -317. October2010 Page 144 Ditton, R. B. 2004. Human dimensions of fisheries. In. M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge (pp. 199 -208). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho. Donnelly, M. P., Vaske, J. J., Whittaker, D., Shelby, B. 2000. Toward an understanding of norm prevalence: A comparative- analysis. Environmental Management, 25(4), 403 -414. EDAW. 1995. Reservation systems for boating on the Lower Deschutes River. Consultant report for Oregon Parks and Recreation Division, Salem, OR. Fedler, A. J., Ditton, R. B. 1994. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19(4), 6 -12. Fisher, R., W. L. Ury and B. Patton. 1992. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd Edition Boston: Iloughton Mifflin Co., April 1992. Finch, A. 2010. Personal communication. Alaska Canoe and Campground shuttle statistics. Graefe, Alan R.; Kuss, Fred R.; Vaske, Jerry J. 1990. Visitor impact management: the planning framework: Volume 2. Washington DC: National Parks and Conservation Association. 105 p. Graefe, A. Thapa., B. 2004. Conflict in natural resource recreation. In Society and Natural Resources: A summary of knowledge. 209 -224. Editors: Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Bruyere, B., Field, D. L., 7 Brown, P. J. Modern Litho: Jefferson, MO. Haas, G. R. 2004. On the waterfront: Vital judicial ruling addresses visitor capacity. Parks and Recreation. September. Hardin, G. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243 -48. Heberlein, T. A., Vaske, J. J. (1977). Crowding and visitor conflict on the Bois Brute river. (Report WISC WRC 77 -04). University of Wisconsin: Water Resources Center. Heim, G. 2009. Subjective "fishing success" ratings (on a five point scale) provided by a long -term guide for each species (reds, silvers, rainbow /dollies) for each day of the year for the upper river. Hendricks, W.W. 1995. A Resurgence in Recreation Conflict Research: Introduction to the Special Issue. Leisure Sciences. 17. 157 -158 Jacob, G., Schreyer, R. 1980. Conflict in outdoor Recreation: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 368 -380. Jackson, E.L. and Wong, R.A.G. 1982. Perceived conflict between urban cross country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. Journal of Leisure Research 14(I): 47 -62. Jennings, G. B., K. B Sundet, and A. E. Bingham. 2007. Participation, catch and harvest in Alaska sport fisheries in 2004. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fisheries Data Series No. 07 40. Anchorage. October 2010 Page 145 enp Recreation 0 Johnson, R.L., B. Shelby, and N. Bregenzer. 1990. Economic values and product shift on the Rogue River: A study of non commercial whitewater recreation. Oregon State Univ., Water Resources Research Institute, Report WRRI -107. Kuss, F.R., Graefe, A.R. and Vaske, J.J. 1990. Visitor Impact Management: Volume One A Review of Research. National Parks and Conservation Association. Washington DC. Lucas, R. C. 1964. The recreation capacity of the Quetico- Superior area. (Research. Paper LS -15). St. Paul, MN: Lake States Experiment Station. Lucas, R. C. 1982. Recreation regulations when are they needed? Journal of Forestry. 80(3): 148 -151. Manning, Robert E. 1999. Search for satisfaction. In: Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction (second edition). Corvallis: Oregon State University Press: 1 -15. Manning, R. 2007. Parks and Carrying Capacity: Commons without Tragedy. Washington, DC: Island Press, 313 pages. Miller, M.L. and V.F. Gallucci. 2004, Quantitative Tourism and Fishery Management: Some Applications of the Logistic Model. Tourism in Marine Environments. (As adapted in a summary graph provided on the following website: h. itp:// www. dcstinationrecoverv. com /destinationlifecycle.html). Neilson, M, Shelby, B., and Haas, E. 1977. Sociological carrying capacity and the last settler syndrome. Pacific Sociological Review. 20(4): 568 -581. Papineau, J. 2010. The agony and ecstasy of southcentral summers. NOAA report. Anchorage, Alaska. http:// pafc. arh. noaa. gov papers /southcentral_summers.pdf Pedersen, G. 2005. Fishing Alaska's Kenai River. Fishing Alaska Publications. Anchorage, AK. Puttkamrner, A. 2001. Linking wilderness research and management volume 3. Recreation fees in wilderness and other public lands: an annotated. reading list. (Wright, Vita, series ed.) Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR- 79 -VOL 3. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 29 p. Roggenbuck, J W.; Williams, D .R.; Bange, S P.; Dean, D J. 1991. River float trip encounter norms: questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research. 23(3): 133 -153. Roggenbuck, J. W. 1992. Use of persuasion to reduce resource impacts and visitor conflicts. In Manfredo, M. J. (Editor). Influencing human behavior: Theory and applications in recreation tourism, and natural resources management. Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore Publishing. Romberg, W. 1999. Market Segmentation, Preferences, and Management Attitudes of Alaska Nonresident Anglers. Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic University. Route, A. J. 1994. River Journal, Kenai River. In River Journal series, Vol. 2, No. 1. Frank Amato Publications, Portland, OR. Shelby, B. 1980. Contrasting recreation experiences: Motors and oars in the Grand Canyon. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 35(3):129 -130 October 2010 Page 146 ec u dy ndi I at c� Shelby, B. and M. Danley. 1.980. Allocating river use. USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Portland, December. Shelby, B., M. Danley, K. Gibbs, and M. Petersen. 1982. Preferences of backpackers and river runners for allocation techniques. Journal of Forestry 80(7): 416 -419. Shelby, B. Whittaker, D. 2004. River running in the Grand Canyon: Current situation and social impacts of alternatives. Technical memorandum for inclusion in Administrative Draft of the Colorado River Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement. National Park Service. March. 160 pages. Shelby, B., D. Whittaker and M. Danley. 1989. Idealism versus pragmatism in user evaluations of allocation systems. Leisure Sciences 11(1):61 -70. Shelby, B., D. Whittaker, and M. Danley. 1989. Allocation currencies and perceived ability to obtain permits. Leisure Sciences 11(2):137 -144. Shelby, B. 1981. Encounter norms in backcountry settings: Studies of three rivers. J. Leis. Res. 13(2):129 138. Shelby, B. and J.M. Nielsen. 1976. Use levels and Crowding in Grand Canyon. Colorado River .Research Technical Report #2, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Shelby, B. and R. Colvin. 1982. Encounter measures in carrying capacity research. J. Leis. Res., 14(4):350 360. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J. 1991. Using normative data to develop evaluative standards for resource management: A comment on three recent papers. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 173 -187. Shelby, B., D. Whittaker, R. Speaker and E.E. Starkey. 1987. Social and ecological impacts of recreation use on the Deschutes River. Oregon State Parks .Division, Salem. Shelby, B., N. Bregenzer, and R. Johnson. 1988. Displacement and product shift: Empirical evidence from Oregon rivers. Journal of Leisure Research 20(4):274 -288. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P. 1996. Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18, 103 -123. Shelby, B. Heberlein, T. A. 1986. Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. 164 p. Shelby, Bo; Vaske, Jerry J.; Heberlein, Thomas A. 1989. Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: results from fifteen years of research. Leisure Sciences. 11: 269 -291. Shindler, B. and B. Shelby. 1995. Product shift in recreation settings: findings and implications from panel research. Leisure Sciences 1 7(2):91 1 Sigurdsson, D. and Powers, B. 2009. Participation, effort, and harvest in the sport fish business /guide licensing and logbook programs, 2006 -2008. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fisheries Data Series No. 09 11. Anchorage. October 2010 Page 147 recreation.. t Maio, Fah alicatjons Spangler, B. 2003. Integrative or Interest -Based Bargaining. Beyond Intractability. Editors: Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: June. Stankey, G. H., Cole, D. N., Lucas, R. C., Petersen, M. E., Frissel.l, S. S. 1985. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning (Report INT -176). Ogden, Utah: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Raw data and PowerPoint presentation summarizing 2004 observation monitoring and exit interviews from the Upper River and Middle River (July and August). (From Doug Palmer). US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005 -2010. Concession fee and use information from Sportsman's Landing and Russian River Ferry. (from Janet Schmidt). US Forest Service. 2009. Russian River Campground and Day use area fee and use information. (from Bobbie Jo Skibo). Vaske, J. J. 2008. Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation, and human dimensions. Venture Publishing. State College, PA. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P. 2002. Generalizing the encounter norm crowding relationship. Leisure Sciences, 24, 255 -269. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Heberlein, T. A. 1980. Perceptions of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors. Leisure Sciences, 3(4), 367 -381. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Shelby, B. 1.993. Establishing management standards: Selected examples of the normative approach. Environmental Management, 17(5), 629 -643. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Heberlein, T. A., Shelby, B. B. 1982. Differences in reported satisfaction ratings by consumptive and non consumptive recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(3), 195 -206. Vaske, J., M. Donnelly, and D. Whittaker. 2000. Tourism, National Parks, and Impact Management. In Tourism and National Parks: Issues and Implications. Butler, R. W S. W Boyd (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: New York. Watson, A. E. 1995. An analysis of recent progress in recreation conflict research and perceptions of future challenges and opportunities. Leisure Sciences, 17, 235 -238. Watson, A. E., Williams, D. R., Daigle, J. J. 1991. Sources of conflict between hikers and mountain bike riders in the Rattlesnake NRA. Journal of Park and Recreation. Administration, 9, 59 -71. Whittaker, D. 1990. Sustina Basin Recreation Rivers: "White Papers" on critical planning issues. Anchorage, AK: National Park Service, RTCA report. 62 pp. Whittaker, D. 1993. Selecting indicators: Which impacts matter more? In Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report No. PNW -GTR -305: 13 -22. Portland, Oregon. October 2010 Page 148 Kenn; Recreatio Stuy_ n n j Whittaker, D. 2004. Situk River User Survey: Supplemental Analyses and Findings. Report to Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute for inclusion in summary report of 2003 recreation visitor survey. May. Whittaker, D. 1996. Kanektok, Goodnews, and Togiak Rivers: User Survey Findings and Implications. Dillingham, AK: US Fish and Wildlife Service. 48 pp. Whittaker, D. and B. Shelby. 1988. Types of norms for recreation impacts: Extending the social nouns concept. Journal of Leisure Research 20(4) :261 -273. Whittaker, D. and B. Shelby. 1993. Kenai River carrying capacity study: findings and implications for management. Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage. Whittaker, D. and Shelby, B. 2006. User survey on Delta National Wild and Scenic River. Report to BLM. Anchorage, AK. May. Whittaker, D. and Shelby, B. 2007. Allocation river use: A guide for river professionals. River Management Society. Whittaker, D., Shelby, B. 1996. Norms in high density settings: Results from several Alaskan rivers. Paper presented at the 6 International Symposium on Society and Resource Management. The Pennsylvania State University, May. Whittaker, D., Vaske, .1., and Willams, T. 2000. 1999 On -river user survey for the Gulkana River, Alaska. Bureau of .Land .Management. September. October 2010 Page 149 Introduction 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 N. N. q C River Fish thru sonar (RM 6) 2009 Eaoy dfl9 Average time 10 catch king: 14 hrs (guided); historical avg is 12 21 hrs (unguided); historical avg is 24 Final catch: 9,924 (well below avg); 84% above sonar Final harvest: 7,049 (well below avg) Final cumulative sonar: 25,688 Estimated escapement: 18,000 (goal: 17,800 to 35,7 Similar to 2001, lowest on record 2009 Late Run Kings sn July 3o1 end Rough historical average ry °s 6 ,10 ,l 3 ,O nR b y A ti ,�b ti 1.1) yo y§'" 1 o r S1� ,So P aai P .0 P a d, P ao, c� 4 4 0 e 9 High water from July 25 to season end This section of the supplemental report provides additional summary graphs of use level information or related conditions (e.g., salmon counts, flows) summarized in the Major Findings and Implications report. Graphs include: Figure 1. Chinook counts through sonar (mile 8.5) and related angling success measures. 1 Figure 2. Early and late sockeye counts through Russian River weir (shows timing on Upper River) 2 Figure 3. Late sockeye counts through Mile 19 sonar (shows timing on Lower and Middle River), 2 Figure 4, Russian River campground and day use in 2009. 3 Figure 5. Russian River campground: percent that are AK residents. 3 Figure 6. Russian River campground: percent that use tents. 4 Figure 7. Sportsman's Ferry parking counts per day 4 Figure 8. Sportsman's Landing boat launches per day, 2005 to 2010. 5 Figure 9. Sportsman's Landing boat launches per day, 2009 vs. averages and maximum for 2005 -2010. 5 Figure 10. Boat counts on Lower River from overflights (KWF) on high use days in July 2009 by segment. 6 Figure 11. Boat counts on Middle River from overflights (KWF) on high use days in July 2009 by segment. 6 Figure 12. Percent guided boats on Lower River (from highest of four daily counts by ADF &G). 7 Figure 13. Percent boats that are fishing on Lower River (during highest of four daily counts by ADF &G). 7 Figure 1. Chinook counts through sonar (mile 8.5). and related angling success measures. (00. S urplemtnt 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Fish through weir Early run: Final cumulative count through weir: 52,200 Escapement goals: 14,000 to 37,000 Long term average: 52,00 Late run: Final cumulative count t Escapement goats: 33, Long term average: 81 ugh weir: 80,100 to 121,000 009 early run sockeye (Russian River) High water period on Upper River 2 Rough historical average 0 ry 4 i o 4a Rti r°� 6 y Q ,1 'h O 6 `kt. y 1 b 4 0 4 0 440 ��o 1 ya m �o �a v). Pa Pi es P E A A g `r c 4e9 `40 c jeQ Figure 2. Early and late sockeye counts through Russian River weir (shows timing on Upper River). Fish through sonar Late run: Cumuiative estimate through sonar: 745,200 In -river goat 650,000 to 850,000 ..Long term average: 883,000 0 et ai 4 ,0 'So 1 1 �r �a )a Q P .4 P 0 .4 P .+A ye co r ef' Figure 3. Late sockeye counts through Mile 19 sonar (shows timing on Lower and Middle River). varcril and jvne 2010 009 late run sockeye (Kenai River mile 19) Lower and Middle River only Rough historical average 'nigh water periods 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 Kenai Russian River Users Memorial Day Stat SumAerneret21 Fport Part 1 istir.litiewu use Iles& ':.31f-orin Fishing opens IZ Ps. 1, 1 ,N`b ,15) Nc> `b N le ss> s ,p 4) e Figure 4, Russian River campground and day use in 2009. Percent of Russian River campers that are AK residents 111 Day use High water period EMMA Traditional late red run peak on Upper River J 0 I Figure 5. Russian River campground: percent that are AK residents. Average=72% )s te 4 ,}e Gp leg e 4 Z Confluence ReaeaFch and Consein,:3 100 80 60 40 20 0 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 Percent of Russian River campers using tents 111 i 6111116 1 a 11 Sq:dy E: R> Total parked vehicles per day Figure 7. Sportsman's Ferry parking counts per day. Average=13% P "2 42 4, 1, b, q• e e e Figure 6. Russian River campground: percent that use tents. Ferry vehicles tan= High water period i Spartomaras. Vehictes Traditional late red run peak on Upper River 0 e 0 0 191 a 7 <I 40 40 .0 CarlftFusoce h'ie and on.:.;!,:i..ritAng 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 4,10' 4s? 41 2005 2006-2007 2008 .....2009 2010 120 100 80 60 40 20 Kor River ri5,1:, study 0- 'ff.ioroo.kmenflifn Refporf Pan:. use. Information, Sportsman Launches Per Day Traditional late red run peak on Upper River C=:=3 I d I 11 it 1 1 H 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1111..!11 111 II.i!1II 1 Figure 8. Sportsman's Landing boat launches per day, 2005 to 2010. Sportsman Launches Per Day 1. I Traditional late red run peak on Upper River l' I Id 1 1., I 11 I I I I I 3 3 I 3 I I I t 1 I I 0 op N 13 et eV. 0) 1 .0 so na 4; t ;:k et y. e5 k 1 1 1 2009 —Average—Maximum Figure 9. Sportsman's Landing boat launches per day, 2009 vs. averages and maximum for 2005-2010. C:orrifitiet•e !4:esearch a41A Comuftir:;-g jt)118: 2015 Pac 5 500 400 300 200 100 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 sl R:epc.;41 Pa:a '1 us.e leveH-rvilovinIatki Number of powerboats (from overflights) Total: Lower River (Soldotna Bridge to PHIara to Warren Ames Bridge) Soldatna Et Bridge fo sonar Beaver Creek to Pillars Sonar to Beaver Creek ,S) t■V Sat Jul 18 N V Sun Jul 19 Figure 10. Boat counts on Lower River from overflights (KWF) on high use days in July 2009 by segment. Number of powerboats (from overflights) Total: Middle River (Soldotna Bridge to Skilak Lake) o 0 Sat Jul 18 Sol6otna Brd53qa to. Mn. River Kenai Keys a a a ,..0 h:" 1:b Sun Jul 19 Moose River to Kenai Keys to SMSzt}c Lake .0 .6 Tue Jul 21 .0 4 Tue Jul 21 Figure 11. Boat counts on Middle River from overflights (KWF) on high use days in July 2009 by segment. C,c Reserircd. and F-ac 10 80% 60% 40% 20% 100 80 60 40 20 0 4-A k1s Percent of guide boats ken61 R.Niar FO,!7roa7rt F"771iit information Nate: Zeros are "no guide" days rb rt, N.47 IP‘' C t° Figure 12. Percent guided boats on Lower River (from highest of four daily counts by ADF&G). Percent of boats fishing o Dark shaded bars are High water (drift only Mondays" High water Figure 13. Percent boats that are fishing on Lower River (during highest of four daily counts by ADF&G). c::' iiese74T7oi .P.v.r..:e 2010 Pa7A77 7 Month Date Day Segment 1 locations) Comments May 13 Wed Upper, Lower Road: visit multiple observation points. 14 Thu Lower Road: training with Suzanne Fisler. 15 Fri Middle Road: visit multiple observation points. 23 Sat Upper Boat: Bridge to Powerline slough area. 24 Sun Upper Boat: Powerline slough to Jim's Landing. Jun 6 Sat Upper Road: Russian River and Ferry. Boat: Bridge to Blood Beach. 7 Sun Upper Boat: Blood Beach to Jim's. 13 Sat Upper Road: First run opening day. 18 Thu Upper, Middle Russian River bear meeting. Boat: Skilak to Torpedo outlet 19 Fri Middle, Upper Powerboat: with SP ranger. Road car counts on Upper. Jul 1 Wed Lower Powerboat: First day of bait. River counts with SP ranger. 9 Thu Upper Road: Russian River and counts. 10 Fri Upper Boat: Bridge to Skilak inlet. 11 Sat Lower Powerboat: with ADF &G counters and SP rangers. 12 Sun Middle Boat: Drift from Bing's to Centennial. 13 Mon Lower Boat: Drift from Centennial to Pillars. Road to Beaver Creek. 14 Tue Middle, Upper Road: counts. 21 Tue Lower Boat and road: with SP rangers and at multiple access points. Aug 9 Sun Upper Boat: Bridge to Jims 15 Sat Upper Boat: Bridge to Jim's 21 Fri Upper, Middle Road: Vehicle counts 22 Sat Middle Powerboat: with SP ranger. Road: observation points. Sep 6 Sun Middle Boat: Lower Skilak to Rainbow Ally 7 Mon Middle Boat: Rainbow Ally to Bing's. Road: Middle River observations. 19 Sat Upper Boat: Bridge to Jim's Landing, Introduction Fieldwork This section of the supplementary report describes fieldwork conducted by the primary researchers for the project. Survey and observation technician fieldwork (survey schedules) are summarized in Part 6, Additional information about study methods. Introduction Ted Wellman Adam Reimer Bruce King George Heim Joe Connors Dwight Kramer Will Josey Pam Russell Walt Arthur Bobbi Jo Skibo USFS Jack Sinclair State Parks This section of the supplementary report provides notes from a series of focus group meetings with agency staff, stakeholders, and user groups were conducted from January to March 2009 to review issues and help develop survey items. The primary purpose was to review, Conclusions from the 1992 study and 2002 monitoring program, then develop priorities for this study; Impact "indicators" studied in 1992 and 2002, then help decide which should be replicated; Management strategies studied in 1992 and develop new actions to be assessed in this study; Use and field work data collection options. Notes from the meetings are provided below: KRSMA River Use Committee Meeting February 9, 2009. 1 to 4 pm River Use Center Introductions (10 minutes) Reviewed study approach and elements (10 minutes) Sampling issues Discussion: Do we need to survey guides and private users that tie up to their own property? There are logistical challenges. ADF &G does not. Make sampling schemes parallel with ADF &G procedures. Interact with ADF &G. Three types of property owners: Ideally we should try to reach each.... o Commercial lodge, B &B, guide o Personal home (year- round) o Vacation home There may be a difference between a boater with a dock and those that use public launches. If you have a boat at a dock, you can go for short trips, at odd hours, easier may be a different use pattern. If you use a public launch, it's more likely to be an all day or at least 4 to 6 hour trip. Specific launches may have specific clientele. Eagle Rock is probably used more often by "locals," compared to the big launches like Centennial and Pillars. People may leave the river "early" after seeing crowding levels need to sample beyond "classic" transition times (noon to 2 pm changeover), impacts Lower powerboat interference. o Need a question that reflects getting "forced out" as more boats join the "parade" (lower river king anglers). o Powerboat interference and incompatible fishing methods. Interference quirk: 1 person can ruin 50 experiences by doing the wrong technique. The 50 isn't the problem, the one guy doing the wrong thing is the problem. Y.. Observation Options o Some times they do it out of ignorance. o Other times they don't' care. o Guides get nervous telling people sometimes. o Other guides get a reputation for telling people off (goes both ways). o Example "going against the grain" drifter through Beaver Creek bouncing /trolling area. o Deciding which technique to use depends on many variables: tide, weather, clarity, hole. o At low use densities, everyone can do as they please, o As boats are added, people have to do the same thing. o Individual holes /drifts get reputation for specific techniques. a Evolution of techniques in past 15 (especially last five) years. o More back bouncing. o As tide changes, there can be a switchover unclear who "decides' and how norms are enforced. o Bottom line: need a "preferred boating technique" options (percent of time you got to use the technique you wanted at the place you wanted a Note: Tide affects technique choices as far as the Pillars (sometimes even Stewarts). o Backtroll through Eagle Rock drift incompatible with drifters (standard technique) at high use times. o There are technique specialists. And there are generalists, Any can be effective... o "Did fish tactics chase you off the river o Question should be about did you get to do the thing you want as often as you want, not did you get to do any individual technique (because some troll and bounce at the same time and it could get too complicated. o Aside: Back bouncers move slowest, trollers next (lines are downstream of the boat); drifters move fast downstream (lines are upstream of the boat being "dragged Bank angler interference. o One guy casting instead of flipping "messes everyone up." o There is a "rudeness factor" in these interactions. One guy being very hard core is worse than three who mess up through ignorance (but are fine after you teach them). Example discourteous behaviors: o Cutting into the "line" at the top of a troll or drift subreach. o Standing on your shoulder while fishing reds. o There are "unwritten rules" on how to do all these things. o Guides know them better than ever because of Guide Academy. o How to train the "weekend warriors Bear -human interaction issues. o Fish carcass counts as new impact. o Bear -human interactions as a new impact. Major bank angling crowding between Skilak and Bings advent of more boats who do drop -offs. o More drop offs than ever. o Possibly pirate guides. (Guides must stay with their clients). o Water taxis are expressly forbidden, o Part of the problem lots of bank fishing areas were closed for habitat protection. o People have abandoned bank angling for reds from shore to getting to bank angling areas via boat. o May be hard to sample them without a boat (at the takeouts will ork to find the boaters, but should they get a bank angler or boat survey? o Need to 'angler proximity" for the Middle powerboat survey during red season. Bank angling availability. o Need to count up the miles potential question: we have X miles of closures, how much more? o We have X miles of boardwalk, how much more? Discussion: were most closures in areas with lots of red angles disagreement. Lower River: o Not the sonar station. Maybe the bluffs above it (private property o Eagle Rock o Maybe a house at end of Beaver Creek. o Guides may volunteer to do some counts need to make it simple. o Tide is a huge variable on how use works in those areas. o Bank angler count at Big Eddy boardwalk. o In past, Watershed Forum has done aerial counts (not this year). o Distinguishing personal use vs. sportfish is an issue on lower. PU are coming up; sportfanglers are going down lower. o Water clarity is a variable. o Eagle Rock drift is a key place. 0 o Middle River: o Used to be some agency counts from Skilak to Bings none planned. Need to do this if we go out there. o Sterling to Soldotna has smaller holes, faster water, less places for powerboat "circuits." o Much lower use than Skilak to Bings. But good king fishing in end of June (as first run comes up). o There is power drift. Not great places to watch /count high density. o Sterling to Skilak is nuts during 2 red run. o Also heavy during august rainbow /dolly season. o Note some no boat areas exist in this reach. o Bings is the place to survey lots of traffic. Way more than Skilak. o Private launch at Dots lower use May not get permission. o New impact: How far to your car (walking to where you parked)? o An issue at Bings and Jims mostly. o Time of day matters. o Bank angler densities from Skilak to Bings from boat drop -offs and boat users may be as high as on lower or at Russian. o But boat densities are rarely as high as boat densities on lower. o Some middle river driftboats will bring "super kickers" to do "circuits" they put out a big wake. They still run the trip as a downriver 9don't go all the way back to put -in using power). o Upper: o Jim's, some highway locations, and Russian are all good observation choices. o Takeout is Jim's but will you survey Upper Skilak for canyon trips? o Yes, Upper Skilak has lots o use these days. Agency Meeting February 12, 2009. 1 to 4 pm River Use Center Jack Sinclair AK State Parks Bill Romberg ADF &G Anchorage sportfish Torn Vania ADF &G Kenai Bobbi Jo Skibo USFS Seward Janet Schmidt FWS Kenai NWR Ginny Litchfield ADF &G Div. of Habitat Mary King ADF &G Kenai Timothy Stevens ADEC water Robert Ruffner Kenai Watershed Forum John Mororcich KPB River Center Robert Begich ADFG Kenai Joe Connors KRSMA president Joe McCullough DNR Jeff Brooks FWS regional Doug Whittaker CRC Introductions (15 minutes) Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minutes) Sampling Pvt Lower River o There are clusters of private docks could roam among them on occasion. o But permission would be needed. o Might be able to survey landowners as they came into River Center for permits semi random o Then just ask about their latest trip, o Likely to get "new" landowners? o Agreement not random sample; treat separately. o People fish varying hours to avoid crowds need to do some odd hours sampling, Lots of variables affect time of day and day of week choices: Fish counts Tide Water clarity Weather Drift vs power Guide vs. unguided days Middle River o More public use at public launches exceptions are Kenai Keys (also Dot's} o Lowest use on Bings to Swiftwater reach low powerboats, some drift o Highest use Bings up to Skilak has become primarily powerboat o Aso driftboats with kickers to do short "circuits" (put out a big wake going upstream) o Driftboats still doing a down river trip just going &ow in some sections (repeating circuits). Upper River o Major launches and distinct bank angling spots. Observations and counts DEC will be doing aerial counts on three days in July. o Talk to Tim Stevens for details. o Sat, Sun, and a Tue in crux period in July. ADF &G counts o Two stage creel: Counts from a boat Take -out interviews o Contact Robert Begich from more details and to coordinate FWS fee receipts tJSFS fee receipts State Parks fee receipts Ferry receipts Tie to previous year use level counts to characterize the year ADF &G willing to rate a matrix for quality of fishing? (Maybe) Need at one time counts of anglers at state park units Could count vehicles and vehicles not inside Bings (but near Bings) Lower River o RiverQuest Bluff just up river o Eagle Rock (everyone agrees) o Bluff above Stewarts o Peninsula College o Beaver Creek from end of road (need permission) o Bank anglers at Cunningham in reds and silvers o Beaver Creek boats at anchor in silvers' o In Silvers, Stewarts to King Sonar Middle River o Few suggestions much lower use o No good bluffs or way in from Kenai Keys to Bings o Need a boat Upper River o Guardrail in early am o Gwins on down to Sportsman List of Issues Boating conflicts incompatible methods, proximity Availability of bank angling areas (access without trespass) New launch needs parking waiting time Human bear issues (upper river) Other human wildlife interactions Unregulated or long term camping (Middle and Upper river) Hydrocarbons in July Turbidity Micro -hydro in watershed Human waste management not just campers Growth. density of development Lower and Middle Rivers impacts Discourteous behavior o Two types: Ignorance intentional o Much is related to incompatible methods lack of knowledge o Or telling someone when they are doing it wrong o Or someone "cutting in line" in a "circuit (drift, back bouncing zone, etc.) Launch impacts o waiting time o parking too far away o how to handle people who just go away rather than wait? o price of private launches o Pillars often furl or long wait one out, one can come in now Incompatible methods o Most know the ends of "traditional areas" for different methods o But people sometimes "sneak" in using another technique (especially at the ends a sort of encroachment) o Note that traditions have changed in past 5 to 10 years (to more back bouncing rather than trolling). Crowding in general o Discussion satisfaction vs, crowding o Crowding is pejorative o Are you introducing it by even bring it up? o How do you ask about crowding at a place known for high density? o Parts of the Kenai are a "sacrifice area" okay to have high use (discussion) o Non anglers have also been displaced anglers are everywhere. User Characteristics Questions Did you pay a fee? Make sure to know where you sampled people, time of day, day of week Who caught fish but also whether boat has caught fish May even matter if you have caught fish so far this season pressure is off after one or more Actions Platforms (ELPs elevated light penetrating platforms) o Some needed at Kiily on river right been closed due to trampling o Could re -open with boardwalks o Hard to ID specific sites users might not know the areas o Could be general for reach o Need to ID places for stairs too o Sometimes stairs is more important than full -on boardwalk o Cut -bank below the Russian Fish cleaning stations o City of Kenai needs one for all the personal use folks o Other problems at other sites also razor clams o Carcass management is site specific issue Launches o Need a drift take -out below ER for most tides o Pillars is okay, but some anglers would like to go lower if tide will let them. o Need a launch on Funny River side? Road extension may affect use patterns (Forest Lane to Keystone) Toilet options o Ask the guides o There are well known /used areas (privacy seems to determine) o Need one or more between Bings and Skilak o Or require carry out o Discussion will Alaskan's do this? Law enforcement o Need more need less is not nuanced enough Boater education o Rules of the road o How to approach safety zones Beaver Creek o Need a driver PFDs o Mandatory for unguided coming? Boating safety o Mandatory education? o Voluntary education o Videos on youtube o Web -based tersts and certification o Key elements taught at guide academy o Make the information accessible to public o Night time running lights Other education o Teach bank anglers how to fish reds in high density o Need videos other teaching media Russian River bear problems o Don't leave gear unattended new regs o Bear closures after incidents regs change Lower River safety a No wake areas Beaver Creek corner, Big Eddy bend, boat launches, 3rd hole middle river o High traffic zone lanes? Overnight camping o FWS areas mostly o New plan questions o Long term stays gravel bars may be illegal already (unenforced) Parking lot length of stay o Already varying 4 6, and 12 and 24 at various places o Consistency is important; change by season Use limits o Powerboats only on Lower river? o During July only? o Perhaps even smaller sub segments (e.g., Porters to Pasture) Personal use vs sportfish overlap some Cleaning station conflicts personal use vs. others (number of fish issue) Personal use boaters using higher up launches and driving down because wait at Kenai City launch is so long. Management Actions Boardwalk discussion good and bad points. a Good: habitat protection, level place to fish from, spaces people out evenly. May protect fish from some predators. o Bad: aesthetics, not natural, funny angle for casting and catching (depends on flow level), hard to beach fish, ice rips them out and causes snags, provides no screening between anglers like real trees. May "trap" juveniles for other predators. o Speculation about how good they are for habitat, But better than concrete or rip rap. o Can be built better /worse. Not continuous provides more sense of "privacy." May not be an issue for red anglers. a Rule not more than 1/3 of a given property can be boardwalk. o Early 2000's study: —12% of bank is "compromised" (docks, erosion control, trampling. May have changed better with boardwalks, o Boats tend to avoid boardwalk areas is this due to aesthetics? Competition? o New ones remove and stack. Fiberglass. More parking. Ettiquette education also about technique compatibility. o Education about "rules of the road" o How to drive through certain areas depends on flows, clarity, and tide. o But generally you try to avoid running next to bank (wake and courteous to bank users) o How to deliver etiquette info is key: multiple methods. Coordinated rehab projects for habitat. Human waste but carry out is not happening soon here. o Upper guides carry out their waste. a Bigger issue on Upper River and Skilak to Bings, where there is more camping. Fire hazards and fire pans. Not Alaskan tradition. Not a big issue except at camping areas on upper, middle, o "Let them do what they have been doing until you prove there's a problem" Carcass management bear management. o Major Russian River issue (not so much on kenai). o Localized issue (Moose River eddy, Centennial, Swiftwater, Slikok). a Fish tables are the attractant. o Personal use folks are the real problem (60+ fish). o Also waiting in line issues at some places. o Aversive conditioning needed for bears. o Possible bear population reduction. Shot up signs. Use conflicts: o Drift boats dropping anchors in challenging channels —get in the way, hog a hole. o Bigger issue in silvers. o Can set up localized problem areas with new rules no anchoring here. o Discussion: rules on anchoring are unclear. There are competing state park and ADF &G rules. o Biggest conflicts are incompatible fishing techniques. Boating safety o How many "close calls" do you have per day driving between people? a Beaver Creek is biggest problem area. To miss the bouncers, you need to go close to bank. o Major differences on Sat (busy), Sun (warriors only), Mon, drifters, Tue (super Tuesday). o Safety fix: require the average Joes to get a Kenai River license (after course). o Make privates as "professional" and 'skilled" as guides. incompatible fishing methods, o If we are already doing informal segregating, why not make it more formal? n How will you know on the river lights? Sirens? Time of day? Opinion leaders (guides don't want to be have enough public relations problems). Full range of use limit ideas: o Odd /even boats by registration. o Odd /even boats by sticker /household. o Deschutes style reservations. a Limit guides (discussion will this fix anything if 213rds of total use is private Displacement coping Don't do "hearsay" question or don't pay much attention to it. Need a real study of displaced use to do it right. Others even doubt that. "I'd hate to be limited because of the feelings of someone who no longer even uses the river" C .1.. ,r.a .,a., ,l .�6a r tit :11110 i` L 3 -a° 3 Kenai River Sportfishing Association Focus Group Meeting February 13, 2009.1:30 to 4:30 pm River Use Center Ricky Gease Andy Szczesay Ron Rainey Rik Bucy Gary Turner Mike Crawford Jim Golden Dennis Gease Dick Erkeneff Introductions (15 minutes) Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minute intro 50 minute discussion) interest in allocation issues o Bag limits are very important components of angler experiences how can one keep that out of the study? o Crowding may be important when you aren't catching fish less or not important if there is good fishing. o Fishing conditions depend on whether commercial nets are in the water. o This river is all about catching fish. o At least you should put the year in context and make sure there are questions that ask how many people caught fish (themselves or others on their boat) so that can be considered with their other responses. c Interested in opinion toward flexible vs. fixed "windows" with commercial nets out. Overall condition of the river o Much better than in late 80s no big jetboats, people are in tune with how to fish the river, better facilities, habitat improvements. o Meeting escapement goals. o Fishery is healthy (aside from the commercial catch). o "It's crowded, but people have a really good time." Concern about solving crowding by guided use limits and more "drift -only' days o Balance is good now. o Some of us want less drift only days. o Limiting guides is not going to solve crowding. o Although the density of boats can be intimidating to a neophyte driver, it all works once you get the skill. There are places to go to learn the skills. o "I tire of people telling me how crowded it is when they don't even fish it." Reputation for crowding is worse than actual crowding. 'Customer Service" philosophy needed at agencies o Need to focus on increasing opportunities o Increased access needs to be the mantra o Example challenges with developing Slikok Creek SRS bank fishing (archeological concerns) o Example: need a sign identifying Slikok Creek SRS from main road o Example: Izaak Walton needs more parking (up on highway if no room down below). o Example: Make Pillars parking and ramp bigger. Too crowded. o Don't close bank angling areas down build ELPs to allow use. o Make better maps showing where access is not where it isn't, o This is the highest use road fishery in AK manage for high density o Why don't we have a visitor center? o Need more to develop interpretation of cultural sites not just use cultural resources to block off access. Sampling Upper River o Powerline o Russian o Sportsman /Ferry o Jim's Landing o Upper Skilak Observations and counts c "Manage but use' should be the philosophy o "Users are not the threat or an enemy" o Talk with Dwayne Bannock guy changed DMV around consultant? Bob Penney may donate some airplane or helicopter time for at one time counts from air Lower River o Need to sample at Kenai City ramp at least in early season; may be overrun with Personal Use in second reds though. a July 1 is by definition the start of second run kings o Private launches are becoming more restrictive will need permission to sample. o Sample at Eagle Rock. o Sample bank anglers at Ames Bridge during reds. o Sample at River Bend (multiple guides) o Sample at Ciechanski (boats only pit stop) o Poacher's Cove (multiple guides) o Guides at different launches may be different (hard to say). o Certainly guides at private may be different from guides at public launches privates have no waiting time issues, bring clients in more frequently and easier. o Harry Gaines multiple guides o Poachers is the most important 40 plus guides and some general public (long time users) o Pillars is different from the rest. o Kenai Landing only usable at medium and higher tides. o More personal use boats. o Beaver Creek has an 'exclusive' atmosphere, Middle River o Swiftwater some will use this to go downstream if others are crowded. o Multiple guides at end of Swiftwater road. RM 27.5 o Funny River road bank anglers multiple places; 2 sets of boardwalks o Rotary Park o Section line below Scout Lake o Check with Robert Ruffner on easement habitat places. Landowner survey o Consider separate sample of landowners on easements o Do lower, middle and upper get both sides of river How "hot" is the fishing by species and segment. Escapement by day. List of Issues Use increases o If you restrict access in one place, create new problems elsewhere o Unimproved access areas get the worst treatment c State Park units can handle some higher use (have the facilities and presence); these unimproved areas have no management. o Focus on clean -up and building good trails and stairs and boardwalks and we can handle the numbers. Drift only o If there is a place, it's the segment from Moose River to Soldotna; not on Lower River More access for bank anglers More launches for boats Public restroorns Fishing regulation enforcement Illegal guiding Rental boats and novice drivers Level of boating safety Number of fish Turbidity (most think this is not an issue not in important habitat) Hydrocarbons (this is taken care of with the new four stroke regs) Managing agency philosophies (see discussion above) Impacts Dean Hughes and Mike Edwards habitat restoration biologists may maintain a habitat quality database to help form question about miles of habitat needing work, Fishing methods question maybe okay but too many variables to regulate. Better to educate. Make sure we have "there are no problems" options or question. Boat safety question might be okay depends on how phrased. User Characteristics Questions Did they catch fish? Did their boat catch fish? Have they caught fish this season? Did they use rental boats? Length of time owning a boat? From Anchorage, Kenai Pen, Outside? If Outside, are they staying with Alaskan friends or relatives? If in- state, are they traveling with Outside friends and relatives? Skill level of boaters running boats (ask to self rate) and rate the person driving. What type of boat vee, semi -vee, flatbottom. On amount caught caught and kept vs. caught and released vs. hooked but lost. For guided users: did you join others or were you a charter trip (knew everyone in your party)? For Outside users part of a cruise package, independent travel, or visiting friends /relatives (VFR) Satisfaction 1 Overall Evaluation Questions Do you plan to return? Classic satisfaction scale "Isn't this ultimately all we care about Discussion on the limits of satisfaction as a variable. Actions Boardwalks o Design them better nflue c o Example good one: Centennial o Example bad one: near College Redesign Cunningham Park o Add boat launch Improve Ames Bridge area o Now just a viewpoint— unused o Bank angling is difficult o Could put in a boat launch Ciechansky area needs parking, launch and campground Pastures could have a boat launch, campground Public easements at Big Eddy SRS conflicts with landowner Buy Eagle Rock and improve, make bigger, improve campground Control parking to equal size of park use area Add parking at Pillars, increase ramp size (technically tricky) City of Soldotna could put in a ramp on river right across from Slikok Toilets o River left RM 18 o Near sockeye sonar at RM 19 o Near Pastures (start of them) o Could sell coffee at some of these a Guides will tell you specific places used as "bathrooms" Launches o Funny River side RM 31 Education efforts o Boating safety o Recognizing fishing techniques and following suit Rotary Park needs toilets Section line easements need stairs Morgan's needs a boat ramp Bing's needs major rehab Section lines need hardening to handle high density Izaak Walton needs more parking Campers from Skiiak to Bings need to carry out toilets Need fee system o Pay for management needs all money to go back to the river before public wit support o Could have a sockeye stamp o Kenai River stamp o Other user fees Fish cleaning need to have more for personal use folks George Heim Robert Gibson Gary Galbraith Pete Jeskie Erik Route Cheryle E James Ron Gravenhorst Kyle Kelley Kyle Kolodziejski Cooper Landing Focus Group Meeting February 18, 2009 a 1:30 to 4 :30 pm Community Center Introductions (15 minutes) Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minute intro 50 minute discussion) Sampling Middle River o Bing's o Lower Skilak o East Redoubt o Swiftwater 00 aka Old Aalamatov o Dot's talk to Stan at store, Open irregularly. Busier on a windy day (can't use Lower Skilak to come across). o Funny River side bank anglers Upper River— Kenai Canyon folks a Upper Skilak includes users who travel to /from outlet via large boats. o Upper Skilak also has river users with kickers coming across after a float down from Jim's. o Weather should be a factor few will use if there is a south wind at Seward (NOAA forecast) means big waves on the lake. But predictions are not always right. More waves in afternoon, as a rule. Often wait till morning to cross. Guides will hike out users the hike becomes part of the adventure. Upper River Lake to Jims o Some Lake to Sportsman's a Some Sportsman's to Jim's o A few use unofficial put -ins Resurrection Trailhead (bridge) o Note that some guides are not 'official" they are doing one of their 3 "incidental" trips per year which equates to 6 trips (3 fishing, 3 scenic). o Note that some guides with official permits have limited starts from Sportsman's to Jims (in the refuge), so they do extra trips from Lake to Sportsman's. Bank anglers o Bar just downstream of Jim's °snaggin' hole" first pull -out on Skilak Lake road o Mouth from Hidden Creek trail unique group of hike -in anglers. Few in number, but frequent use. o Highway mile 57 o Big pullout near "Guardrail" (just downstream from Ferry) a Mile 53 bridge (upstream of Russian confluence). o Cooper Creek campground (mix of anglers and RVers). Note new personal use fishery at Russian River (proposed? finalized o At falls o Maybe also Cooper Creek? Jim's best times: o 2 to 6 pm (full day) o 4 to 7 pm (half day) o Guides informally stagger their put -in and take -out times to avoid jams o But busy days are tough anyway (lots more private use) Sportsmen's best times o 11 to 2 pm for morning half -days o 4 to 7 pm for afternoon half -days Private anglers sometimes run late afternoon to evening floats during reds o Take -out at Jims from 8 to 10 pm List of issues Bear angler interaction o Fish carcass management Number of scenic raft trips o They don't compete for fishing spots, but they take up space o May interfere with casting Human waste (Russian River side especially, campsites) Boat launch crowding a Technical fix: more space, organized better (especially Jim's) o Education: teach folks how to use the areas more efficiently o Need more parking for trailers o Keep non trailer vehicles out of trailer spaces Litter Overnight camping by those no trained in low impact camping o Some want no overnight camping o Camps are "beat out" o Fire danger o Human waste General habitat impacts potential impacts o From highway trucks may end up in the river o Discussion of bypass 1 DOT planning (not near resolution) Medical search rescue o Need defibulators available o Swiftwater rescue depends on guides at the moment o PFDs are not always worn by public o Guided clients required (on refuge) o Kids don't float has been successful o Need boats One person cats are not appropriate craft if low skilled boater o Hard to fish and run those boats at same time o One person cats also dodge launch fees creating trails through woods Law enforcement o Needed for fish and game regulations mostly o General presence is very low o Handling of fish is one issue (size of fish you can keep changes 16 on upper and 18 on lower one per day) Education o On -river regarding spacing, where you stop o At launches efficiency and use appropriate spaces for parking Lack of marked trails spider web of trails and impacts Private development (Middle River, on Kenai Lake) o Some concern about set -back rules 1 enforcement o Cooper Landing is becoming higher density than in past o Several participants have seen a lot of changes Old cabins are now large houses, B &Bs Sportsman's concession appropriate level of development? e Research Impacts Observation Count Issues User Characteristics Questions Guided use is perfectly known use of log books FWS and FS track this use Ferry use by concession FS keeps CG and day use parking information at Russian River State Parks tracks Cooper Landing boat launches Guides are probably too busy to count while working Crowding Anchoring interfering with passage down a channel (back channels) Fishing over the top of other bank anglers "Stealing' a place of a bank angler after they pause to and a fish can lead to shouting, worse Motor /non -motor conflicts o One way rule from lake to end of motorized reach (Kenai Lake) o How far up can bog boats come up from Skilak? Low holing middle river. Moving into a drift before your turn. Boats passing through casting range of bank anglers Parking a single car in trailer spot o Note: guides park across street at Jim's o Very few spots at Dot's Bear issues o New rules must carry your back pack with food with you (not leave it out) o improper carcass disposal o DLP kills on the rise o At Russian and near Skilak camps, down to Killey Target shooting among campers Middle River (near lake) o Not aesthetics o Safety Human waste percent of sites with impacts Fish handling impacts damaged mouth/jaws o Did you see mishandling? Other fish regulations o Did you see people snagging use? (red runs) Spacing between boats on Middle River getting worse each year Middle River drift vs powerboat conflict o Reg changes related to no anchoring have reduced impacts (RM 47 to 50) o It can be a tight channel when the best place to fish is the channel o Worst from Aug 1 to Sep 30 o But moving into Oct o Powerboats do laps there is a slow current o Driftboats can often hold against the current o Powerboats sometimes have to "free float" because it is too shallow o Boat wakes from driftboats with large kickers (9.9 to 15 hp) throw big wakes o Big kickers are going upstream but not all the way back to Skilak just for laps o Wakes from powerboats on Middle River may swamp bank anglers (dropped oft) Choke point near Dot's cut bank on north bank Type of trip (part of permitted guided, or incidental of a non permitted guide) Guided unguided Shuttle services may be able to track private shuttle use (correlate wl trailer counts) o Wildman's o Alaska Canoe and Campground Have ferry person take photo of use across river and count density o Through first and second runs (unnecessary after mid -Aug) Gwin's guardrail area look up river 2nd run only Still lots of use near Russian during silvers Sept fishing has exploded in recent years weekends after labor day Start counts on second Saturday in June Might be able to count entanglements and snagged fish at Russian Count the number of boats that run the "gauntlet" between island and left bank Count number of boaters without PFDs Count ratio of different types of boats o One- person fish cats o Canoes 1 kayaks o Drift boats o Rafts o Big cats o Other Mile 43 lots of crowding of boats o Anchoring boats o Boats running into each other Number of occupied camps near Skilak (first three miles) o Number of fires o Human waste impacts Litter annual clan -up with Ak fly fishers o Contact Bill Stockwell Actions Road repair o Grade Skilak o Into Jim's Boardwalks stairs fencing o Russian to powerline (obviously) o Also on river right side o Also getting to be a problem on the island a Spider web of trails from parking areas on Sterling o Boardwalks mostly won't work up here ice, not the right level o Need stairs to river, direct use back from riparian areas o Organize use, direct them to good trails and they won't use poor designed user trails Toilets Launches Education !enforcement efforts a Fire education at Russian River (FWS side) o None even allowed till below powerline roundly ignored a Signs alone don't have a big effect. o Need personal contact StreamWatch o Need enforcement presence (but not too much balance) o Need to "pcik your battles" on what to educate about o Overload of information no one pays attention o Concept of information seeking person (should have information available) o Others don't know they need information personal contact is critical o Need a consistent message all agencies cooperate o Could have an internet education program How to fish the Kenai when crowded By segment, with place specific information "Here's how this place works" Kenai River stampe pass o a fee used to improve river o required education course internet or in person) some support/ others do not o but the idea is that everyone gets one maybe not even required (just encouraged) Camps o Human waste carry out requirements wag bag technology (guide brought example) o One fire ring per camp Fish cleaning stations o Choices: few and concentrated or more and dispersed o Depends on location and density of users o People won't use them if not in good places, too far away from where they are going o No consensus on what is least attracting to bears Use limits o Day use permits o Overnight permits and designated camps o Maybe no camping o May already be rules against camping next to river (check) not really enforced If use limits o Different levels for reds, silvers, rainbow o Different levels for boats and bank users o Hard to use parking lot limits to indirectly manage use levels o Lots of users pile in RVs or large cars o There are shuttles and taxi services Kenai Area Fisherman's Coalition Focus Group Meeting February 18, 2009.7.00 to 10 :30 pm River Use Center Ken Tarbox Jack Dean Adam Reimer Scott Misner Dwight Kramer Larry Marsh Introductions (15 minutes) Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minute intro 50 minute discussion) Reviewed study appropriation language o Water quality and habitat issues were prominent Use may have to be curtailed." Overall condition of the river political pressure discussion o Public and agency recognition lags behind an "eco- catastrophe" o Need to measure perceived biological health o The importance of habitat diminishment can't be overstated o Who is reluctant to act? The agencies o if the study shows strong public support for habitat restoration or concern about environmental damage, agencies might be more willing to act o It is not OK to get just one action out of the study we need many a Anything that comes out of the study will need to go through agencies, Dept of Law o 200 k for the study (180 to contractors) is not sufficient to address the legislative mandate of the appropriation (or the court order) o Legislation that created KRSMA set the priorities: Protect habitat Protect experiences o Environmental problems and experiential problems are just symptoms of the disease; the disease is too much public use o Many in the group worry that State Parks or other agencies will not use results or take action o Some in group just want to see something dramatic done incremental "fixes" will just "nibble around the edges of the problem" Sampling Kenai boat harbor not necessary before personal use starts during second run of reds, there are few waits at other launches, so people do not use Kenai boat harbor Last two weeks in July are busy at all launches but Kenai boat launch is mostly personal use Stewart is nearly all guides these days Eagle Rock is 50/50 guides and unguided. Pillars is 50/50 River Quest is guides and landowners Riverbend is guides and landowners Eagle Rock charges higher prices the last 10 days of July ($40 per single launch; usually its $10). Swiftwater from late June to early July; used to be good king fishing throughout July now catch rates dry up in late July Sample adjustment first few days of bait fishing should be sampled. Holes in Swiftwater area can easily become crowded fewer of them, quick access from launches Some are just small holes no more than 3 to 5 boats at some Crowding is of an order of magnitude different from the lower river. Swiftwater should be sampled throughout second run of reds. Make sure you sample non anglers too. Can't get to displaced users (completely displaced); but we will document within river displacement Sample the before 6 and after 6 anglers they will be different than those who go during guide hours List of Issues Turbidity "Quality of experiences" in general Increases in use trends Displacement due to crowding Hydrocarbons Declining size of king salmon Water quality standards Too crowded Too many guides Boat wake disturbance turbidity Boat wake disturbance quality of experience among waders Satisfactory catch rates Lack of fish and game regulations enforcement Lack of powerboat driving enforcement Sightisound of riverside development Is the Kenai wild /wilderness -like? Visual impact of development naturalness Non -point pollution Sedimentation Zero lot lines in developments Septic problems in developments Amount of docks, erosion, and bank hardening More development more people on the river Loss of vegetation along developments Erosion control can create channel changes downstream More coordination among agencies Should we building boardwalks that will just get blown out by ice? Displacement ask people if they know people who have been displaced? Use trends higher proportions of guided to unguided use (see trends) Observations and counts King salmon creel survey may have some problems: hard to identify who is actively fishing, vs. just underway, vs. near a dock Harder yet from air Number of passes per hour especially at Beaver Creek, Eagle Rock Number of boats wide at Beaver Creek Biggest problem is two hours after a high tide observe then impacts Ask a question about allocation of guided and unguided use preamble could give actual proportions, then ask what a "reasonable proportion" might be. Discourteous behavior list o Bank anglers catch a fish, lose your spot Swearing Fist fights Hooking people Illegal activity snagging, illegal gear, over limits o Powerboats Speed adjacent to other boats Running inside of other boats, too close to bank anglers 'close calls" but hard to define Cutting lines as you travel through Guides are more comfortable in close proximity they have had more practice Lots more "hovering" in holes than in past Guides idle in the same spot the sweet spot of the hole In silvers, folks even anchor, then leave their anchor to catch the fish, return to the anchor via a buoy Controlling a fishing spot "We are managing for the lowest tolerances" o Non anglers Can't even float the lower river from 6 to 6 o Driftboats Just the presence of a powerboat diminishes experiences Need more drift only times and periods There is never a break from the incessant noise of powerboats But if we add drift only days on lower river, there will need to be more launches (by Cunningham Prefer "no wake" fishing Prefer one way fishing (an alternative to drift only fishing) o Guides Taking red anglers on Mondays User Characteristics Questions Landowner survey should ask whether they operate a B &B Guided users should be asked if they are on a day trip or part of a week long package Self- identify meat vs, experiential anglers Self-identify level of specialization "50% of users (especially non residents) catch less than one fish" Ask: were you targeting your limit today? Actions Alternatives to drift only o Drift only (no upstream travel), no fishing with a motor on o One way travel (no upstream travel), but allowed to fish with a motor (back troll) o One trip travel (one trip upstream per day); allowed to fish with a motor (back troll); no laps o One trip travel (one trip per day); some laps allowed in specific places o Allow drift boats to have kickers for downstream travel only (to get to launches against tide) Boating safety o Beaver Creek bend No fishing 2 wide instead of 3 wide 1 wide instead of 2 wide Merge rules o Crossover Need a navigable channel through this area Could require lines pulled in for a 50 yard segment o "I don't just want to address these problem areas with education /regulations I'm looking for something more substantial" (e.g., drift only days, guide limits) o No driftboats with kickers going upstream (Middle River) Example guide /unguided allocation in July o 3 days with guides below Pillars (e.g., T, W, TH) o 3 days with unguided below Pillars (e.g., F, S, S) o 1 day with drift only o Then switch... 9 2- stroke rule kicked about half of private boaters off the river costs $6,000 for a 50 hp 4 stroke Agencies spent 500 k on boat wake study, now 300 k on turbidity Burden of proof is on agencies to show hard but this is `backwards" burden of proof should be on the offending users to show no harm If asked the question state parks should have to show whether the new hp regulation would cause harm? "50 hp does not reduce erosion wakes are only marginally smaller when boats have full load, which they usually do and boats now go faster (increasing safety concerns) Question: overall rating of agency management. Rate whether public thinks agency is proactive vs. reactive. Ask whether agencies should get more vs. less money. Boardwalks o "We pretend we are solving a habitat problem with these it's a band aid on an ax wound" o "I don't care about nibbling around the edges of the Kenai's problems I want major limits" o "These are sold as habitat and riparian improvements but they are a neutral action at best. Prevents bank tramping, but it is not better than full riparian zone.' o Should we spend such massive funds on something that ice is just going to take out? o "Boardwalks treat the symptom, not the disease" o Boardwalks take away from the naturalness of the river o They might work in some places but not everywhere... stk Notes from Kenai River Guides Focus Group Meeting February 19, 2009. 7:00 to 10:30 pm River Use Center Monte Roberts Aaron Cooper Ray DeBardelaben Dave Goggia Ed O'Connor Jerry Strieby Introductions (15 minutes) Sampling 8 Notes on guide trends o Used to be about 20% were all- season guides o Now its about 33% o Another 33% are Alaskans usually teachers o Rest are part timers usually just July or a little into August most are non residents. Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minute intro 10 minute discussion) Overwhelming concern: is this study just a tool to "stick it to the guides Researcher response: Study is reviewing the full range of impacts and possible ways to address them. It will include guide limits, but will go beyond reviewing opinions toward that single action Discussion of how limits of guides may not reduce use much if guide use is only a third of total use, you'd have to reduce guides by a lot to make a difference. We are already limited in many ways 6 to 6, no Sundays or Mondays, etc." Discussion about who wants to reduce guides: o Retirees who fish full time like guides on weekdays, at all hours o Homesteaders who have seen the river with much lower use in distant past (implied unrealistic expectations for today or the future) o Commercial interests (inlet fleet) who see river as an "incubator" for their fishery would prefer no sport fish catch or impacts on the salmon runs (e.g., tramping, biophysical impacts) o "Environmentalists" those who want all use and impacts to be much less. Lower River: Early run Kings o Pillars and Stewarts only Eagle Rock only at high tide o By June 1-- start up at Centennial Transition times: o 11:30 to 1 pm to catch the half day trips o 2 to 4 pm to catch the 'full day trips o Most early run kings (through Jun 15) are "full day trips" o Only in late June and into July are their substantial numbers of half day trips Users that go before /after guides o They pull their boats after 6 am- --more like 7 am —to avoid ramp crowding o Many will also fish from 5 pm to 11 pm o Sample from 9 to 11 pm o No need to seek these users in May or early June fishery (only July) Pay attention to tides when considering sample choices o This particularly important in May and June fisheries (fewer fish) o Highest use is 3 hours after a high tide o Many boaters will fish short period from about 2 hours after to 4 hours after high tide In July Middle River Kings: o Swiftwater o East Redoubt road Unocal or "Agrium" (sp is popular bank fishery Moose Range Meadows boat launch End of road boat launch last free one left All are heavily used last week in July Much lower use than on lower river in kings Rocks have a lot to do with this, also perceived fishing success But some holes are productive Some consider it a spawning holding area and won't fish it Important right after bait rules change...need adaptive sampling to make sure we capture this higher use bump... Izaak to Swiftwater as a drift trip starts about mid -June Second run of reds o lzaak Walton o Morgan's o Funny River Road o Bing's Skilak to Bing's red, trout, and dolly fisheries o Start about June 15 o Goes through September any more even later o Need to ask angler proximity question among boat users on Middle and Upperr rivers during the second run of reds o Can't wait at Lower Skilak to get info about the "campers" go out and survey them on river o Guides may be willing to take surveyor on trips (Monte offered) during the August Sep period. List of Issues o Pillars may be full as early as 5 am o Centennial, RiverBend, and Poachers are all important guide launches o Rental boats come out of RiverBend and Poachers primarily o Also Jim Nelson? o Big Eddy "harbor" also ahs guide use increase in non resident unguided powerboats retirees with little boats Amount of closed bank fishing limits opportunity Public mis- perceptions regarding guides: o Number of guides is highest number on side of guide boats (into 600s o Number of guides is equivalent to amount of guide effort it isn't Guide number issue How about one number per guide rather than per boat? Could use 202 A, 202 B etc. Low guide number is a status symbol to some Could re -order and back fill numbers that are no longer in use o Guides are mostly non- residents o Guides are more aggressive than others (depends on the guide) Fishing pressure from Pillars to Ames Bridge (much higher) Fishing pressure from Pillars to Soldotna Bridge (much lower) Lack of river access in lower river (more boat launches) Launch congestion Lack of restroom facilities Parking availability Boating safety o Especially at Beaver Creek, Crossover a Also at Eagle Rock Honeymoon Pillars RiverQuest to airplane Stewarts in front of island Mud Island Fish cleaning carcass management o Centennial lagoon o Izaak Traffic congestion Boating safety Middle River o In the "braids" out of Skilak o When people anchor in navigable channel (especially silvers) o Near Middle Killey (250 feet upstream) o Less "clarity" on best technique so you have incompatible fishing methods (drift vs troll) o Trout guys drift, silver guys troll or anchor Middle river bank angling conflicts a 3 fly anglers on a beach spread out to make other uses impossible o Conflict with drift boaters shouting on occasion Middle River landowner boater conflicts a Angler in a house comes out and yells at boaters, or fishes in boater drift o Most guides will "just go away" from such conflict o There are few backtroll options in this reach lose good productive water if you don't fish in front of some houses... Kasilof Kenai interaction o Changes on Kasilof have affected Kenai guides o Complicated story involving fish reg changes and success rates on both rivers a Guides need a backup fishing option if Kenai kings are slow in May or June. Local residents that used to go with guides o Many have been priced out o Restricted guide hours doesn't allow evening use Impacts Reviewed existing list: a Satisfaction, perceived crowding, fishing competition, interference, bank proximity Discourteous behavior examples o Yelling, verbal abuse o Driving by at full speed (difference between on step" and full speed) o Aggressive maneuvering through holes Sometimes this may include some guides But there are others; more about personality than whether you are guide /non -guide In the old days, guides would actually push others along /out Guide academy has really helped improve this All skilled anglers will try to get their lines through the "sweet spots" It takes a skilled angler to know when they are even being pushed away from a sweet spot; and those guys know how to do the same moves Less skilled won't even know it is happening to them "No one can make you move' Need to ask about "courteous behaviors" o Guides sometimes toss other users a lure o Will return cut lines R User Observations Actions 0 Kenai Rhf o Will offer advice Silvers has less discourteous behavior than kings o More fish, less boats o More places to fish o But still some conflict anchoring vs trolling control of fishing water Boating safety o "Close calls" is hard to define depends on your won skill and experience level o Example: No fear of a fast boat operated by a known skilled guide coming within feet of my boat; but plenty of fear if a rental comes at same speed /distance o Distance between boats is a variable, but its dynamic: What Boat A is doing What Boat B is doing Where on the river? Are boats involved? Are bank anglers involved? o Ultimate question: did you have to take evasive action? Beaver Creek upstream Eagle Rock downstream Pillars RiverBend RiverQuest boat dock Count boats, passes, proportions of different types of users You will find it hard to identify and count "dirty looks" or more obvious conflicts everything is more subtle than that it's a dance, and most users figure out how to do it (and like it) What you will document is good etiquette at crowded places like Beaver Creek people have to figure out how to get along. Note that tides affect techniques and compatibility of methods o If high tide there is a 1 to 2 hour "dead zone' of activity at the limit of the tide o Down at the Pastures or lower parts of river, this might b 3 to 4 hours o Use will be concentrated upstream o After tide has swung, use will pick up downstream o There is more river to use o New techniques trolling in slack tide work for some There are few great observation sites on Middle River o Maybe someone's house in Kenai keys Bathroom options o Lower River Below the Pastures Mud Island Eagle Rock Cunningham need stairs and removable dock Crossover area o Middle River Upper Killey Below Super Hole Launch issues o Guides have worked out systems at Pillars to avoid use of limited parking Requires a separate driver, but gets folks in and out quicker 1 SW Should be required for all guides; need separate system for guides so they can get out of the way of public Public takes longer; guides can be in and out quicker o Need longer dock at Pillars o More parking at Pillars o Need a launch between Beaver Creek and Cunningham o Need a launch at Warren Ames Bridge o Buy out and make Eagle Rock a bigger launch o Possibly buy a place on Beaver Creek and make launch or rest room o Need some boat launch on the K -Beach Road side Fish cleaning stations o Need more at all launches o What makes a good one: Large, solid Not always aluminum box should be wood Make people bring their own indoor /outdoor carpet Look at what they do in Seward, Homer Need to be level Need a water supply not just a bucket 4 people should be able to use one at one time Open some "closed to bank anglers" with new boardwalks o Highest priority is near sockeye sonar area Education o Make private boaters pass a proficiency exam (at least written, maybe an on -water component) o Everyone needs to know rules of the road (and many don't) o Guides have got their act in order via guide school how about everyone else? o If we do a Kenai River etiquette video Need to show how fishing works on this complex river How you launch How you reel out and reel up When and how to cut line (as necessary during a tangle) o Rental boaters should have to show on -river proficiency Enforcement priorities o We have enough rules but no enforcement o "I'd like to see some reckless driving /unskilled drivers get tickets" o Might ask in guide survey: How often have you seen enforcement presence? How often have you seen violations (especially fish regs) Lots of lawbreakers after hours Lets keep the criminals less bold —they have free rein at the moment Guide limits o Any more limits will be challenged we have too many already o If there is a freeze, we might shrink by attrition o This economy is going to weed out the non professionals o Staggering won't work –gives unfair advantage to early guides who will "clean out the holes" o "We already have privates cleaning them out before 6 am" Reservation total use limit systems o Little enthusiasm for any system in place on other rivers a Researcher briefly described classic multi -day permit systems and the Deschutes and Yough systems Notes from Kenai River Guides Focus Group Meeting It February 20, 2009.9:00 to noon River Use Center David Gayer Dohn Cho Ron Boo Kandas Gary Kernan Bill Niederhauser Tyland Van Lier introductions (15 minutes) Guide experience ranges from 4 to 21 years; newer guides have multiple years pre guiding on river All use powerboats on lower river; two have drift boats too Most also offer trips on Middle River (usually with powerboats) Summary of study objectives and approach Concern that study is focused on guide limits; discussion clarifies that a full range of actions will be considered. o If you ask non guided public: do you want guides off the river, it is easy for them to say "yes" who wouldn't want less people? o But everyone has a right to use river including guided users Better focus: would you prefer guides to be professional? o Guides have worked hard on their public relations o "Take a vet fishing" program o Academy o Maybe we need a "take a local" fishing to improve image more Sampling Early kings o Pillars only first week after May 15 o Add Stewarts and Centennial in last week of May o Very few public users aside from guides during week in May o In June, more locals start showing up o July is the switchover to late run (by definition) a Everyone is on the river staring in July (especially late July) Concern about landowners who don't use public launches o RiverQuest users are different from public users (take short trips out) o RiverBend may be willing to provide access (iin July would be worthwhile, not in June) Concern about surveying people after trip is over o People may feel differently through the course of a trip o Variations in crowding by different locations over the course of a day a End of day is acceptable for evaluations but recognize variation through day Middle River o Some swiftwater boaters go upstream o End of road launch on E Redoubt a Key transition times at most launches on lower and Middle river: 3 to 5 pm o Bank anglers at blue and white house "Agri" Sign Upper River o Non permitted guides can take 3 days a year (incidental use a Those can't be on Sat Sun or Mon (so sample on some of those days) a Some powerboats guide from Upper Skilak to mouth of Kenai Canyon (sign designates how far up they can fish); sample at Upper Skilak (toward the end of the day; catch them at 4 to 5 pm) o Aside: Do canyon guides have a 6 -pack license for towing boats across the lake? List of Issues Report o Aside: This is where some folks may use bait for trout (because you are remote from roads) 0 Dragging anchor issues with driftboats on Middle River (especially silvers) Super kickers pushing driftboats upstream on Middle River (Skilak to Bings) Guide numbers o It's not 600 guides despite there being as many as 600 guide boats o It's better to have more guides on the river than more unguided boats guides, as a rule, are better drivers o But 5 to 10% of guides may be more aggressive or give guides a bad name O Other guide restrictions o What about some guide shifts from 4 am to 10 am? o Better than staggering; all participants disliked staggering (5 am, 6 am and 7 am starts on alternate days after breaking the number of guides into 3 groups). o Tides are an issue on the start times (especially in June) o Going early really matters some guides do a great job of "cleaning out the holes" so who ever gets the early start time has a huge leg up on others a Unguided users get the holes first (before 6) o Note: guides actually watch where the skilled locals went before 6 am and they may go elsewhere, assuming the locals "cleaned out" the hole a Participants believe that KAFC wants 8 am guide starts, which would be devastating to many guides (KAFC meeting did not specifically discuss this action, but was supportive of fewer guides and shorter guide hours) o Participants believe that later guide hours will encourage more locals to set pirate guide trips o Some discussion about the amount of pirate guides (locals that actually sell trips or at least recover costs); guides are interested in enforcement, but recognize that it would take stings, etc. o What about no specific hours for guides? just have to declare which 12 hours you will fish and stick with it; others thought this might be hard to enforce (log books), and it would have to be enforced: on Kasilof if trips were unlimited, some guides would run 3 per day o Other alternatives: In July, require all guides to offer full day trips (not two half days) o In other parts of the year, allow some days with two half days, some days without, c Allow the boat to fish four rods at all times (even if other people in boat have caught their king) so the boat can get finished quicker; as it is now, some guide boats stay out with just one or two lines in trying to get the last client(s) their fish. Guides recognize that harvest might go up, but crowding will go down. o May need to adjust tag system harvest tickets. Make it 4 tags per day per boat. Some guys '`put it on their kid's." O Status of the fishery o Guide impression is that kings are getting smaller, more jacks o Fishery should be managed to provide more fish and more bigger fish o Get more fish in the river, use will spread out more o When fishing is poor, crowding feels worse and is worse more boats chasing fewer fish down lower in the river o When there are more fish, boats can chase them in more places and spread out Crowding o July only for kings on Lower;; it's not bad in May and June o July is bad because 2nd run reds are concurrent with best king fishing o The fix for reds is more open areas to fish (more public access and boardwalks) Unsafe boating o This is about unskilled and discourteous driving o Some are just unknowledgeable /unskilled; some are just bad and don't care Human waste o Need more restrooms o See actions for list Impacts Discourteous behaviors o More complaints registered with State Parks are from guides on other guides, not from the public on guides o Very few complaints about locals from guides we take care of things on the river with careful advice (don't come at folks too hard; know when to keep it yourself Ask about "courteous behaviors" o We give advice o We help folks rig User Characteristics Questions Need to ask if they caught fish Need to ask if they have caught fish this year (kings) Have guides /volunteers complete a matrix of "fishing success" o Because when nets are out (commercial fishing), locals won't spend as much time fishing a Success goes down when nets are out o Use levels change with net openings, sonar counts we need to track Long discussion about sonar count accuracy o May not be o Needs to be some accounting (should put a new one upstream; have them both operate for a few years to calibrate) o Don't just use sonar numbers, since some people know sonar counts aren't accurate o Potential question on guide survey: do you feel sonar is right? Actions If guide limits: o Start with instate guides (limit out of state first) o Next take those who guide at least 60 days a year (limit short season guides first) o Use the guide survey to find out about guide profiles Human waste fix: more toilets o Cunningham better facilities, stairs up mud, dock o Mud island o Beaver Creek o Someplace (not Dots) in the Kenai Keys area Upper Killey o In the braids below the lake a mile or two but others disagree because it is a wild area No long term camping from Skilak to Keys More lower river boat ramps will allow boats to put -in closer to where they fish o Especially at Warren Ames Bridge area (recognizing this is a tough spot to build one because of mud and tides and ice) a improve Pillars to handle the line of users, amount of parking o Put a boat launch at Cunningham maybe make it kings only launch o Need some "sacrifice" docks and mooring areas like Poachers and RiverQuest to keep a bunch of boats in the wafer and avoid lines at launches; some lost habitat, but these boats are not clogging launches every day. a RiverWood as a model dock and launch? Boat driver training education o Written test on rules of the road o Media encouraging appropriate etiquette o Boat maintenance boats need to be up to the river and the passengers they have on them Education possibly on -river navigation aids to make obvious travel corridors in well -known congested areas c Chicago Crossover o Stewart's Island o Beaver Creek o Some think buoys/pilings might work; others disagree o If people are breaking rods when boats fly by at Beaver Creek, we need a better system" o "How about a simple rule: no inside passing Boat operator license o Require an operator's license for the Kenai? o Others disagree —just focus on education, not more regulations o Some could go for a writtenlinternet based test o Guides go to the academy unrealistic to expect Ice angler to go to a week long course o But maybe they could be offered a one day or one weekend course o Teach people not to go by at full throttle, but on step to keep wakes small Require boat driver to drive (can't have rod in water guides note that is how it works for them Declared areas for various fishing techniques o Most guides think this is unnecessary change has happened, people learn new rules quickly o Long story of old guide who resisted drift changing to trolling /bouncing but eventually got the message More enforcement on boating operator skills o Get the drivers that drink o Get the bad drivers More enforcement on illegal guides o At least let them know they are being watched o They have no insurance o They pay no taxes o They modify the price legit guides can charge o They guide on Sundays o Hard to catch they train everyone to just say they are friends Etiquette education on fishing techniques o Don't need formality its complicated and depends on number of people in the area o Do need to teach how to tell what others are doing o You can drift if no one is around, but once its congested, trolling takes over except in the well known drifts o Note that some people prefer less people even if it means lowered success, so they may resist changeover to a troll /bounce technique o Key message: this is a crowded fishery, key to success is "get along" by matching what others are doing Odds/evens on boat registration as a way of limiting use o Seems simple, but it gives advantage to people with more than one boat or those with friends with boats that have an opposite registration o Will lead to lots of 'trading boats" o Won't fix problem o Do we really need to cut use in half? Full use limits (guided and unguided) o Better than guides only o Sounds complicated (when Deschutes system and other systems were described) o Very little support among participants; o "Is it necessary for just two weeks in July (referring to most crowded times in late July in lower river) Maze of regulations and agencies is confusing for getting permits even with River Center Guides are a problem too many and drive too dose to bank at high speed (Middle) Can splash your deck. Messes up lure presentation if you are fishing. ADFG boats cause wakes too. ADFG mortality from research college kids in boats or using nets might not use best practices River is just a free for all anymore Too much animosity between groups need to cooperate to fix problems Airplanes sometimes land on river that's nuts, Near Moose River, Is that allowed? No fishing in powerboats for kings make it drift only. But others disagree how would older folks fish? Hydrocarbon issue is important, but change to two stroke really hit locals. Turbidity will be the next issue to kick some guides off river. But the big guides will remain. Only thing that saves Middle River from high use is Naptowne Rapids (keeps people form traversing form lower). Rainbow guides are different from powerboat guides, Illegal handling of fish (rainbow) Rainbow mouths are scarred too many catch and releases. Too much use. Mortality from poor handling is high higher than ADFG will admit. Wakes can cause safety issue for bank anglers. General overcrowding, especially from guides. How about drift only 3 days per week. Run them consecutively to provide refugia. Trespass issues are small in the Keys. But people walk through woods to get to the river in other parts of the river. Vacant lots, especially. If you are not home. Scout Lake section line is a particular problem. Bear issues carcass management. Unfair treatment by Army Corps. People build and get development grandfathered after the fact. People who play by the rules get refused. RiverQuest seems to have used influence in KPB to get set back variances. Not right. Need better permitting enforcement. Bank tramping closures have largely worked. But maybe now we could reopen a few (with boardwalks first). Need fish cleaning station at Upper Skilak. USGS boat wake data from Joe Dorva, Anchorage. Education ideas: Good video for Internet on safety, where to run (away from bank), rules of the road Require people to watch to get a sticker for your boat. Could work on etiquette for boating, fishing. Drift only discussion Need more (but others not so sure). Main agreement stop them from running laps, especially with drift boats with kickers that throw a big wake. Like the idea of alternating Middle and Lower so there is a place to go. Need a way to leave from your own dock could allow single transit on the drift only reach. If you go drift only, other days are going to be more crowded bulging balloon idea of squeezing one part makes the other bulge. 4 stroke is better quieter. Constant chop is the problem Will Josey Bill Bally Tony Johnson Dave Fena Notes from Kenai River Property Owners (in Kenai) February 20, 2003. 1:30 to 4:30 pm Aquaculture building Kenai River Property Owners (in Anchorage) February 24, 2009.7:00 to 10:00 pm DNR room 240 Ginny Davis 3 other RiverQuest property owners (list was lost) issues Number of guided users boats. Out of state guides, Boating safety too close, too fast. Boater education. Tress and logs clogging channels and passage. Hydrocarbons (now solved with 4 stroke rule). Trespass people using RiverQuest launch, bank. Discourteous behavior Crossing your line Driving too close Going slowing than others Wrong technique as everyone else Need 20 feet between boats, Anchoring territory battles in silvers. Guides more likely to control a spot -trade moorings? Guides have yelled "you are stealing our hole," like they own the river. Note: Not all guides are like this, just some. Little crowding in May or June, but it gets "bad" as soon as July starts. Tides affect when we fish. Guide hours affect when we fish. Go out at four to beat the guides. They are out at 5:30, and drop lines right at 6. Sometimes they clog the holes before hours even start. About 4 of five kings hooked will be brought to net can lose one to the fish or to other boats cutting line. We once cut someone's line because we had a fish on...everyone understands that. But not if you don't have a king on. Guides do better because they are aggressive, but also because they know the holes better. Super Tuesdays are like Lake Otis and Tudor at 5 pm (heavy traffic intersection in Anchorage), Boat safety surprised there aren't more accidents. Lots of close calls, Boardwalks don't detract from "naturalness" they protect habitat, Impacts Interference by boats is the major problem for powerboats in lower river. People tell others "you can't fish that way" but some won't listen, There are no hard and fast defined zones, and I try to fit in. But others don't. Zones might help, especially for dragging (drifting). But l mostly back troll anyway. There is a protocol for waiting in line for a drift or backtroll spot. "low holing" is when you cut the line. For bank angling you should get your spot back if you catch a fish. Foreigners don't always get that (Japanese, Germans). Social atmosphere of combat fishing can be fun if fishing is hot and there is a rod between anglers. No one likes shoulder to shoulder. If someone fishes over the top of my shoulder, they might get snagged," Observation Options Beaver Creek to Mud Island area. Very busy at high use times. Lots of cut lines from people going too fast. Bluffs near Harry Gaines. Sunken Island go to College and look down the river. Poachers to RiverQuest. Back bouncing zone just up from Chinook sonar.No movement, Very close boats. More people are moving closer to Ames Bridge in recent years and fishing tides. Relief of crowding up by Pillars, but worse down there (and at Mud Island because they are traveling back and forth. When the fishing is bad, everyone just makes it worse by racing all over the place. Look for guides merging to a hot spot in a hole and subtly cutting you off. if you have confidence, it doesn't happen. If you don't they push you out of the preferred lane. Hard for an observer to know or see you feel it more than anything. It's like a game of chicken. Very few confront guides (or others) that behave aggressively. (Need a phone number so you could call rangers on them). Some private boaters are aggressive too just less likely. They don't have the pressure to get their clients a fish. Actions "Even if guides are all "good," there are just too many of them." Need limits. If we have to limit guides, limit to in- state. Out of state guides seem to have worse ethics (the ones that just show up for July). Rental boats can be a problem novice drivers. Not used to the river. Maybe ban them. Note: Privates on Sundays can be worse drivers than guides on guide days. And Saturdays are most chaotic lots of guides plus less skilled privates. Need minimum quality boats. "Little dingys that ride on top of a camper are not the right boat for the Kenai." Need a boater education class for privates, especially in July. King fever comes and people drive poorly, which just doesn't work if there are lots of boats on the water. Education course could be internet based. But if truth be told, you relaly learn by doing practice at lower use times so you are ready in July. Harden banks lots of places on Lower River still have trampling. Need some boardwalks to places that are reached only by boat. Don't need new launches. Will just attract more use. Do need toilets especially below Eagle Rock. Cunningham toilets are in bad shape. Make guides carry portapotties? Mud at Ames Bridge prevents use of good toilets there. Could put in some stairs. Carrying out waste wouldn't be hard but finding privacy is. Need some screens (joke), Reviewed range of drift only choices (full drift only, kickers only, one trip only, upstream travel only), If you limit guides limit the number overall first (not number per day per segment). Consensus that there is about 1/3 too many on high use days but not a problem before July. If you limit, limit out of state first. Outdoor Forum message board particpants (in Anchorage) February 26, 2009. 7:00 to 10:00 pm ONR room 240 Participants: George Krumm Jim Jolin Jeremy Lobb Bruce Knowles Observers: Chris Degernes Jeff Brooks Walt Arthur Ted Wellman Introductions (10 minutes) Summary of study objectives and approach (15 minutes) Other topics related to overall study approach I outside specific study topics: Personal Use fishery o PU use is exploding o Has it changed upstream bank angling? Not really. Both are harvest oriented. But no one has seen decline in bank anglers. PU fishery can affect fish numbers upstream (but not on a 50,000 fish day). "We are all sportfishermen, really.,,." But they clog up highways, launches, campgrounds, fishing cleaning tables, in the middle of prime time for kings. They use East Redoubt and make a mess (cleaning hundreds of fish) Wish we could contain their use to their reach; need downstream boat launch, o Personal use fishery has two parts: Boat -based (affects lower river boat -based powerboaters) Mud- people or dredgers o Need to match a timeline for the river with how you organize information. o Drift Mondays are not so drift-like if PU boaters are using river as highway. Understand Mat -Su vs. Kenai substitution effects o Changes in one fishery affects the other o if there is a Mat -Su closure vast increase in use in Kenai (and vice versa) o Need southcentral wide increase in fish, and improvements in access to handle use levels and demand for whole region Allocation fishing regulations interaction o While it's not just about numbers of fish, that is a key variable o Catching fish is the attractant o Regulation changes can substantially affect use levels /demand o Some like restrictive regulations quieter river, less crowds, still good fishing o Others want fewer regulations (no slot limits) hard to measure o Don't not ask questions just because ADFG /Board are responsible for regs they may want to know too Catch -rate and escapement issues o "We are all better harvesters than in the past" o "We handle fish better than in past' o We may even have very good fisheries but there are still problems. o Although some biologists say anglers are not an effective tool for managing escapements (like commercial is) o ADFG don't care about mouth damage say the fishery is still good o But anglers may care about quality of the fish. .eaai Myer zwc.. Focus Sampling List of Issues Reviewed likely launch and bank angling locations using maps. Additional notes (differences from what we are planning) are given below: Timing: Go through October. o October boaters may be different (solitude seeking) in comparison to September boaters o Especially Upper River o Middle River too. o Hunters come back to fishing (after they have done hunting) Is Kenai too crowded just in late July (second run reds late kings)? o No. Also Upper in fall o Middle from Aug. through Oct. o Sometimes even in June especially just after bait is allowed. o Trout on Middle goes way up when bait allowed for silvers which means lots of incidental catching of trout and dollies. o Example of a reg change that could reduce crowding and keep experiences high. Lower River o Make sure to include Slikoklcollege area for bank anglers in 2nd run reds Middle River o E. Redoubt launch (end of road) is last free one and has lots of use with different types of boaters from the pay launches. o Has limited parking, and accesses only a short reach at lower water can be crowded. o Guide lodge nearby sometimes controls the hole. Upper River o Catch users at the main DOT parking lots between Jims and Sportsmans o Wait in parking lot no need to chase folks down. Spider web of trails. o In Cooper Landing behind Post Office o Some powerboaters put in and take -out at Upper Skilk —just fish mouth. o Signs define how high up the powerboats can go Use increases o If you restrict access in one place, create new problems elsewhere o It's about sheer number at some times and places Type of gearftechnigue incompatibility lack of tolerance for others o Spin vs, fly, o Motor vs. drift o Bank vs. boat Lack of access o Private launches becoming exclusive (have to buy a season pass) o Lack of parking at public launches o Amount of wait at public launches o Lack of bank fishing areas during reds o Lack of other places to fish for trout/other species o Lack of access for handicapped Lack of drift only periods /reaches o Need some on middle river o Need more on lower river o Need more in silver season Guide limits o Need 6 to 6 on middle and upper rivers o Guides fill Pillars between 4am and Gam o we need to cooperate and graduate as a group" o Limits will be good for guides too: tourists are saying its too crowded and won't come back. o Need guide operating hours in silver season too. Driftboats with engines (Middle River problem) o They throw a big wake doing laps on Middle River o Increasing numbers o Still taking a down river trip, but with laps Bank tramping remains an issue Number of scenic trips increasing o Take up space o Mostly Upper River o Increasing on middle river o Kayakers from Izaak to Swiftwater Canoes and kayaks appropriate craft? o In unskilled hands, no. o Not in Kenai Canyon. o Not in Naptowne o Can be a problem anywhere on upper or middle river. o Definitely not on Lower in powerboat area. o Fish cats are an issue as well, Lack of rest rooms for boaters o Especially lower o Too much motorboat activity going back and forth o Fishing regulation enforcement Lack of camping sites in campgrounds o Especially during second run of reds o But might increase crowding if we make more o Undeveloped camping is not managed o CGs on FS land shouldn't reserve all the sites ahead of time Fire safety o Beetle kill areas o Manage camping possibly no camping Long Term camping o Bings to Skilak especially o Some on upper river Bear conflicts o 1 report of 21 bears from Skilak to Bings in one evening o Especially in Sep and Oct o Feeding on spawned out salmon o Not necessarily angler carcass management o Recipe for DLP kills o May not be able to fix with education no one is at fault o Just lots of bears and people around Number of fish o Discussion of allocation issue o Use tweaks of regulations to manage use Turbidity o New issue most have not heard of new monitoring results o But they understood the potential concern (have seen wake -based sediment near banks) Hydrocarbons impacts We reviewed 1992 study impacts. Additional notes: Example discourteous behaviors 20 T e eye o DB vs PB mutual intolerance o Fly vs. spin at bank areas (especially in siiversltrout seasons on Middle and Upper) o Drifters or PBs in range of bank anglers o PBs that don't slow down for anchored boat, smaller craft o Boaters who don't know rules of the road o Boats that yield incorrectly a Boats that don't pass correctly o Boats that "low hole" or "cut -in" a trolling area or drift o Boaters that don't "share the hole" especially silvers with anchoring up o Bank anglers that take your place as you land a fish o Bank anglers that fish over the top of you o Bank anglers that "encroach" get too close. o What's too close: not shoulder to shoulder unless everyone is really well skilled and in sync. o Guides occupying holes before 6 am (not fishing, just holding) Courteous behaviors o Returning a lure if someone had to cut a line o Advice o Loaning a lure o Loaning bait o Offering a position back in the bank angler ranks Illegal fishing o Everyone sees it during reds o Need to be careful who you tell not to do it o Scary to tell others off lots of people are packing "bear medicine" o Taking the picture of a violator can be effective as a deterrent o We need people to be more assertive" about law breakers enforce our own Boat safety powerboats, lower river o There is a trade -off between speed and control of boat (keep it on step) o Wake and speed is another trade -off o Hard to say how close is too close depends on who is driving. o "If I know they are skilled, OK to be close." a "If I see a rental boat, be very scared" o We need boat operator license I know this is Anti- alaskan o Note differences between Sat, Sun privates are less skilled o Boats may be inadequate sport boats, underpowered, hard tops, drift with a big kicker o Canoes are a Kenai coffin on some reaches o Hard to see kayaks and small canoes o Alcohol abuse Especially on long holiday weekends (at end) People are tired Tempers are short skills are diminished o Late night operations Need running lights Correlation with illegal fishing o "How many times did you have to take evasive action to avoid another boat a Don't define "close calls" to subjective Distance is a relevant variable but it depends on too many other factors Most important: skill with your boat and perceived skill of other driver split second decision But this would just be an indicator o River Bend area is a classic location where this may be needed Need two lanes? Can buoys work? Between Stewarts and River Bend entire reach is busy, need to be careful o Buoys 2 Anchoring issues o Occurs primarily in silvers o In kings, some rules against anchoring are stronger o But some people still hold as if they were anchored. Bank angling discourtesy o Leave your spot, you lose it (norm during high dneisty) o Discussion over whether that is right or wrong o Leads to shouting matches o Upper river, any high density area: not family safe o Need better tackle requirements so no long landings of fish o This is a harvest -based fishery not the time for a long fight Guide non -guide interaction a Control of trolling space is an issue o Can be subtle they move to get their lines in the "sweet spot" in the hole and stay there o Can be more obvious and aggressive; but if you assert back, most will back off o But the meek do not fare well o Many guides will do this "with a smile on their face others won't o Aggressive behavior is not just in last 2 or 3 weeks of July. o Lots of people just get displaced and don't want to deal with it o "Guides have over promised and overcharged, so they have few choices..." Observations Maybe in a few places More important to mark hazards than define lanes But it all plays into how safe May need some slow down areas not necessarily no wake, but not top speed a Near Centennial can also be hazardous Some rocks are in the mix o Other places with safety issues: Honeymoon Cove OIson's Rock Crossover! All agree this is very tricky a Requires a cut through the high density trollers If not careful, you cut lines Always have to look for an opening Running next to the bank puts you at risk Goal is keep to the middle, run right going downstream Spend time at Beaver Creek for best understanding of highest use area o This is a safety area (hard to pass through) o Also has incompatible fishing methods issues (actually just different speeds and hovering in the sweet spots). o Bank anglers on the bend, o Boats having to pass through a narrow area. o Lots of stationary or near stationary boats. o If you have to pass on the inside, can cut off bank angler lines. o Measure: "nets up" number of boats number (if any) drifting /dragging vs. trolling (most common) number of boats passing track guided and non- guided will the higher the density holes have higher proportions of guides? How many cross at speed vs. at slow speeds o Don't just observe from 6 to 6 (although right at 6 is good time) o Also go from 8 to 10 at night —very high use Watch from college toward Sunken Island o Same list as above o Will need binoculars Mouth of the Russian for the best "action" among bank anglers o But there are many other similar high density locations: o Morgans o Bings o Soldotna city boardwalks o Funny River side across from Swiftwater Ciechansky rest rooms toward Bige Eddy and Harry Gaines Spend time at Pillars for the most "launch chaos" action o Strong current makes it a tricky place to navigate o ADFG boat takes up dock space o Not a big enough dock o Could be organized better (location of fish cleaning area is not quite right) User Characteristics Questions Reviewed full list additional suggestions: Where are you staying? importance of species kings vs pinks vs reds May not matter as much as guides think How specialized are we? Self- categorize? (discussion of this topic) Actions Law enforcement o Few have been checked for licenses in years of fishing o Need more Boardwalks o Most did not like them but saw reason for them o Prefer to fish from bars o Boardwalks can be too elevated wrong angle o Not always in the best place (current) for catching fish o Some would rather just have boardwalks deliver them to the river, but fish from in river o For all the complaints, boardwalks are better than the alternative (trampling and habitat loss) Fencing redirect use away from riparian o Make them aesthetic as possible o People need to be fenced or they will trample signs won't be enough o If you make a good trail parallel to river back from the bank, it might get used o But if you spur to the river and don't fence, people will move along the river and create new trail o They get to a spur, find a person, and move to the side New campgrounds o Inventory all the public, private, and exclusive sites o Some people think we need more, others worry it will just attract more use o But we clearly need some new sites o Jim's? o Lower Skilak? New launches o Warren Ames o Big Eddy but others disagree o Morgan's Of nearby a Between Stewarts and Centennial a Need parking for existing launches otherwise, they work o Dipnetters need their own launch o Dot's will probably go exclusive at some point so near Dots Designated overnight camping on river o Perhaps no camping o Perhaps reservation but doesn't give exclusive fishing use o One fire ring per site o Deal with guides or privates "holding sites" with an empty boat, fire, or tarp a Should have to have a person present o Lots of "holding sites" at developed campgrounds is a way of getting a good parking spot (Centennial) o Also at Lower Skilak Bathrooms o Pastures Bluffs o Like Big Eddy have docks o Could have portapotties with docks anywhere can be serviced o Probably need one every other mile if you want to reduce boat travel o Need handicapped access for some boaters are getting older o Lower Killey and Upper Killey o The Dunes (inlet from Skilak aka Football fields) o Question from group: will bathrooms attract more use? o Keep the Bings to Skilak segment "wild" maybe no bathrooms Require carry out of human waste? o The drift boat armada from mid -Aug through September and middle of Oct o Upper is getting so crowded, they are moving to Bing's Skilak section of refuge Fish stations o Pillars needs more and better design (away from launch, at other end, at least 2 more, helps form a line of boats to take -out) o Moose River get the carcasses out into moving water o Keep PU users out o Eagle Rock needs some (or more) What makes a good fish station? o Good back splash o Hose but doesn't need to be city water —just river water o Long chute to take waste out to river o At least 6 feet long o Have users bring their own mat/cutting board (bacteria issue otherwise o Level o Aluminum o Mike's welding makes the standard quality ones o Nail on the board to hold the fish head Redesign Cunningham Park o Stairs up the mud Improve Ames Bridge area o Now just a viewpoint unused o Bank angling is difficult o Need a boat launch If parking can't be there, few would want to use it. Education o Teach which fishing techniques work in different sub segments o Example: Beaver Creek backtrollers if some are using 3 oz (moving) and some are using 8 az (virtually stationary), they gc at different speeds and there can be conflict; shouting ensues o Teach that it is not appropriate to "hover" and control a hole. Everyone deserves a fair drift/troll through a reach. o Most incompatible methods conflicts is out of ignorance, not intentional aggressiveness o So better education is likely to be helpful o Discussion of education efforts: video with high production values is key o Could make video mandatory o Could make a boating license mandatory If there was a video on boater safety, how to boat and fish on Kenai; o Talk about speeds while drifting, trolling, bouncing a About zones for doing certain types of techniques o About "fitting in' o How to cross at crossover a Use of terminal tackle Disagreement over whether this is necessary Still a personal choice Take risk with mono More on etiquette o Regarding cut lines return them if possible o How to cut a line when a fish is on and this is ok o There is no chance of untangling when one is on. o Weight of line is bigger issue for bank anglers have the right stuff to harvest Etiquette education in high use powerboat holes o People get pushed around by more aggressive boaters o Boat will find sweet spot and stop o Or boat will speed up and go around you to beat you to a spot o As users become more skilled about the sweet spots, there will be more conflict o At Eagle Rock, the current causes drifters to go a different speeds o "You can't make someone go where they don't want to but I've seen boats touch" o "Takes nerve to cope with the aggressive boater" o "You can be made to feel uncomfortable takes away from the joy of fishing" o "It can be intimidating but it is not always the rule there can be lots of cooperation" o A minority of users cause the biggest problems (often guides, but not all guides discussion of whether it is the out of state or July only guides o Worst days can be Sundays when there are no guides o A problem is that people chase "nets up" so crowds form quick o Lots of cell phone communication on river about where use is hot people naturally concentrate o Need to teach people to fish multiple ways to spread use out for example, you can sometimes troll at the tide change and do fine Deal with pirate guiding two kinds: c Guides with their "friends" on Sun and Mon o Never- guides who are there every day with different people o Expensive to "sting" these groups Use of slot limits in June king fishery o If in slot season, how to measure o If it's a close call on slots let them go but some do not o Some participants like slots keeps pressure/use low o Some do not might increase July pressure o Don't even net a fish that looks too small let it go before netting with a cut line or a hook removal tool Designated driver issue o Some think that can be important in high density times o Others disagree what about a solo angler o Consensus you need a driver when a fish is on, but the highly skilled boater /angler can handle this in lower density situations o Possibly limit a boat to four rods (even if there are five in the boat). More drift-only days on lower river and similar issues o Could apply to middle river (Upper Skilak to Sings too) o Could apply to only parts of the lower river (e.g., Centennial to Pillars) o A: Drift only, one way, no laps, no motors Like Mondays now, but only applies to fishing, dip netters still drive up and down o B: Drift only, one way, no laps, motors for downstream only Helps solve the tide issue o 0: Motors allowed for trolling and backbouncing, but no laps, one trip back upstream only. Hard to enforce, but Like Kenai Lake rule now Solves the take- out/shuttle issues of a drift only People don't have to buy new boats Might only apply on some days in July some diversity c ID: Motors allowed like in 0, with a few places where laps are okay (defined) n Allows refugia for turbidity problems (narrow parts) Could address safety areas like crossover o If you do more drift only days, you need to deal with tide issues (can't hold against it) a If you allow motors on driftboats for downstream travel, won't it throw out huge wakes too? o Consensus that driftldrag areas create the most boat wake and turbidity problems that should be first to go in high use times a Consensus that dragging is a lot of work, but back bouncing is even more but very effective when done right o Back trolling is the easiest but can be boring if you stay in the same place "guide needs to be a very entertaining person to keep clients happy in a single spot for 6 hours with a motor running and no fish being caught" Confusing regs and law enforcement o Perennial problem improve regs and presentation o More signs on river to tell what is allowed (at launches) Additional interviews Duane Bannock, former DMV director Tanya Lautaet, Soldotna Chamber of Commerce Jeff Benkert, Kenai Guide Academy Neil and Ken Marlow, Middle River guides Cheryle James, Upper River shuttles Annette and Max Finch, Middle River shuttles Carl Grauvogel, Skilak lake user Study fo R.epco: P3,:!'1:.; 3 L;ED:mwmce Resirch Constking 3 ,ABIE 2014 Technician to complete: Date: 1 Time: 2009 Kenai aver R suasion Study a Powerboat Af I 1. What species did you fish for today? (Check all that apply) Kings ❑Reds ❑Silvers Pinks Trout dollies 2. Which was your primary target species? (Circle one number) 1. Kings 2. Reds 3. Silvers 4. Trout dollies 5. No target other 3. How many fish did you hook, release, and keep (all species)? I hooked fish I released fish 1 kept fish 4. Did other anglers in your boat keep or release fish today? 1, No 2, Yes 5. Did you use the services of a professional guide today? 1. No 2, Yes 6. How many years have you fished on the Kenai River? years 7. On average, how many days per year do you fish on the Kenai River? days per year 8. What time did you launch today? 9. What areas did you fish today? (Check all that apply; circle primary) I'm not sure Mouth to mile 6 sonar Sonar to Pillars Pillars to Poacher's Cove Poacher's to Soldotna Bridge Upstream of Soldotna Bridge 10. How satisfied are you with your trip today? (Circle one number) Very dissatisfied 1 Location Slightly dissatisfied 2 Neither 3 Slightly satisfied 4 12. How crowded did you feel today at the following locations? (Circle one number for each row) Not at all Slightly Moderately crowded crowded crowded At the put in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 At the take -out 2 3 4 5 6 While fishing 1 2 3 4 5 While traveling on river Overall 1 13. For the kind of recreation experience you want on the Kenai, how would you describe the use level today? Very satisfied 5 Extremely crowded 8 9 9 1. Too low 2. Low 3. About right 4. High 5. Too high Name: Phone: Email (write clearly): Location: Group Size: 14. How often today did you see experience other anglers... .,,causing problems (such as littering, being aggressive, violating fishing regulations, etc.)? _being courteous (such as offering fishing advice, returning gear, creating space for you, etc.)? 15. Did you have any "near accidents" with other boats where you took "evasive action" 1. No to avoid a collision today? 2. Yes, times For questions 16, 17, and 18, check one box in each column,,: Left column: what you experienced today. f Right column: what you would tolerate before your trip becomes unpleasant. (If an impact "doesn't matter,' check a box at the bottom). What you What you experienced will today tolerate 40 40 16. How often did other boats interfere with your ability to fish today? Rarely or never About 25% of the time About 50% of the time About 75% of the',bbme Nearly all the time This doesn't matter to me Et This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish 17. How often did you have trouble finding an uncrowded place to fish? Rarely or never About 25% of e (imp' 0 About 50% of the time About 75% of the time. Nearly all the time This oe nit natter to me This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish 18, How long did you have to wait to launch and take -out your boat today? (include time you may have spent in line to pay fees) When putting irk mins When taking -out mins This doesn't matter to rye This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish times times C1 19. We need your help with a follow -up survey that has more detailed questions about how the Kenai should be managed. All information will be kept confidential. Please check one box below and provide contact information. Yes, send the survey by email (to be completed on- line). Yes, send me the survey by mail (to mail back). No thanks. mins Street: City, State /Province, Country: Zip /Postal code: Technician to complete: Date: ion Study Drift Float Angler Survey 200 Kenai River ReCre 1. What species did you fish for today? (Check all that apply) ®Kings ®Reds ®Silvers ®Pinks ®Trout 1 dollies 2. Which was your primary target species? (Circle one number) 1. Kings 2. Reds 3. Silvers 4. Trout/dollies 5. No target other 3, How many fish did you hook, release, and keep (all species)? I hooked fish I released fish 1 kept fish 4. Did other anglers in your group keep or release fish today? 1. No 2. Yes 5. Did you use the services of a professional guide today'? 1.No 2. Yes 6. How many years have you fished on the Kenai River? years 7. On average, how many days per year do you fish on the Kenai? days per year 8. Where did you launch today? 9. What time did you launch? 10. How satisfied are you with your trip today? (Circle one number) Very Slightly dissatisfied dissatisfied 1 2 Neither 3 11. How crowded did you feel today at the following locations? (Circle one number for each row) Not at all Slightly crowded crowded At the put -in 1 2 3 4 Ai the take -out f 2 3 4 5 Whsle fishing 1 2 3 4 Overall 1 2 3 4 Slightly satisfied 4 Moderately crowded 5 6 7 6' 5 6 7 7 8 8 8 12. For the kind of recreation experience you want on the Kenai, how would you describe the use level today? Time: Extremely crowded 8 9 1. Too low 2. Low 3. About right 4. High 5. Too high Name: Phone: Email (write clearly): Location: Group Size: 13. How often today did you see 1 experience other anglers... ...causing problems (such as littering, being aggressive, violating fishing regulations, etc,)? ..,being courteous (such as offering fishing advice, making room at the launch or while fishing, etc.)? times times For questions 14, 15 and 16, check one box in each column... s Left column: what you experienced today. Right: what you would tolerate before your trip becomes unpleasant. (if an impact "doesn't matter.' check the box at the bottom). What you What you experienced will today tolerate 14, How often did other boats interfere with your ability to fish today? Rarely or never About 5% ottlle time About 50% of the time About 75 J� o€ the ttnie Nearly all the time This doesn't m atter to e This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish Rarely or never About 25% of the time About 50% of the time About 75% of the time Nearly all the time This doesn't matter to me This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish a 9;. 9 16. How long did you wait to launch /take -out your boat today? 9 (include time you may have spent in line to pay fees) When putting-in When taking -out This doesn't matter t e This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fis Warns Very satisfied 15. How often did you have trouble finding an uncrowded place to fish? 5 0 D mins mins 17. We need your help with a follow -up survey that has questions about how the Kenai should be managed. All information will be kept confidential. Please check one box below and provide contact information. 0 Yes, send the survey by email (to be completed on- line). o Yes, send me the survey by mail (to mail back). No thanks. Street: City, State /Province, Country: Zip Postal code: 1. What species did you fish for today? (Check all that apply) ❑Kings ❑Reds ❑Silvers Pinks ❑Trout /dollies 2. Which was your primary target? (Circle one number) 1. Kings 2. Reds 3. Silvers 4. Trout dollies 5. No target other 3. How many fish did you hook, release, and keep (all species)? I hooked fish I released fish I kept fish 4. Did other anglers in your group keep or release fish today? 1. No 2, Yes 5. How many years have you fished on the Kenai River? years 6. On average, how many days per year do you fish on the Kenai? days per year 7. About how many hours (total) will you fish today? hours 8. How satisfied are you with your trip today? (Circle one number) Very dissatisfied 1 Location 2009 Kenai River Recre tlo udy Bank Angler Survey Slightly dissatisfied 2 9. How crowded did you feel today at the following locations? (Circle one number for each row) Not at all Slightly Moderately Extremely crowded crowded crowded crowded Finding parking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 To1 tern fshi €igarea 1 2 3 4 5' 6 7 8 fishing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 At fish deaning areas 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Date: i Tirne: Neither 3 Slightly satisfied 4 Very satisfied 5 10. For the kind of recreation experience you want on the Kenai, how would you describe the use level today? 1, Too low 2. Low 3. About right 4. High 5. Too high 11. How often today did you see 1 experience other anglers... ...causing problems (such as littering, being aggressive, violating fishing regulations, etc.)? ...being courteous (such as offering fishing advice, making room while fishing, etc.)? times times Name: Phone: Email (write clearly): Location: Group Size: For questions 12 -15, check or write responses in each column... w Left column: what you experienced today. 4 Right: what you would tolerate before your trip becomes unpleasant. Of an impact "doesn't matter," check the box at the bottom). What you experienced today 12. What was the average distance between you and the next angler? Shoulder -to- shoulder (<3 ft. apart) One Tod length '0-10 feet) One car length (15 -20 feet) Two car lengths l3 Casting distance (about 60 feet) Out of sight This doesn't matter to me This doesn't matter as tong as I'm catdhipg lstt Q What you will tolerate 13. How often did you have trouble finding an uncrowded place to fish? Rarely or never About 25% of the time About 50% of the time About 7% of the time Nearly all the time This doesn t matter to me This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish Number of entanglements Tflrs doesn`t Platter to me This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish Number of times boats interfere This doesn't matter to me This doesn't matter as long as I'm catching fish u 14. How often did you get your line entangled with other anglers today? 15. How often did boats interfere (such as come too close or create large wakes) with your bank fishing today? 16. We need your help with a follow -up survey that has more detailed questions about how the Kenai should be managed. All information will be kept confidential. Please check one box below and provide contact information, Yes, send the survey by email (to be completed on- line). Yes, send me the survey by mail (to mail back). No thanks. Street: City, State /Province, Country: Zip /Postal code: Very Slightly Neither dissatisfied dissatisfied 1 2 3 Finding parking 1 On I at the river 4 Overall Date: I Time: 2Q09er Rive Recreation Study Non Angler Stirvey1 1. What activities did you do at/on the river today? (Check all that apply) 0 Camping 0 Sightseeing 0 Picnicking 1 relaxing Scenic boating rafting 0 Wildlife viewing 0 Other If you are not camping, SKIP to Question 3 2. If you are camping, are you... (Circle one) 1. Tent camping at an undeveloped (no fee) area 2. Tent camping at a developed campground 3. RV trailer camping 3. Which activity was your primary activity? (Circle one response from the list in question 1) 4. How many years have you been visiting the Kenai River? years 5. On average, how many days per year do visit the Kenai River? days per year 6. How satisfied are you with your trip today? (Circle one number) 2 Slightly satisfied 4 7. How crowded did you feel today at the following locations? (Circle one number for each row) Not at all Slightly Moderately Extremely crowded crowded crowded crowded 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8: 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 8. For the kind of recreation experience you want on the Kenai, how would you describe the use level today? Very satisfied 5 1. Too low 2. Low 3. About right 4, High 5. Too high Name: Phone: Email (write clearly): Location: Group Size: 9. How often today did you see experience other visitors... .,.causing problems (such as littering, being aggressive, violating regulations, etc.)? ...being courteous (such as offering advice, making room at a boat launch or campground, etc.)? 10. if you are camping at a developed campground, did you experience any of the following "problems" during your stay? (Check all that apply) 0 Difficulty finding an unoccupied site 0 Waiting to use a restroom Overfilled trash cans Dirty restrooms 0 Loud parties at night (10 pm to 8 am) Generator noise at night (10 pm to 8 am) Unleashed dogs 0 Other discourteous behavior from other campers Other times times 11. If you were interested in viewing wildlife, did you experience any of the following "problems" during that activity? (Check all that apply) 0 Trail or bank users disturbing wildlife 0 Boat -based users disturbing wildlife General lack of quiet from powerboats Unleashed dogs disturbing wildlife Other viewers approaching wildlife too closely 0 Other (please specify 0 Other (please specify) 12. We need your help with a follow -up survey that has more detailed questions about how the Kenai should be managed, All information will be kept confidential. Please check one box below and provide contact information. 0 Yes, send the survey by email (to be completed on- line). 0 Yes, send me the survey by mail (to mail back). 0 No thanks. Street: City, State/Province, Country: Zip postal code: Introduction The order of the survey instruments: 1 User survey 2. Guide survey 3. Landowner survey 4. Codebook for all surveys This section of the supplemental report provides the user, guide, and landowner follow -up survey instruments, followed by a codebook that ties survey items and responses to variables in an SPSS data base. Additional information about the database and survey analysis is summarized in Part 6, Additional information about study methods. Note: The surveys presented here are those sent to mail recipients. The format of the online surveys (with similar question content) sometimes differed because computers can direct users to skip sections that are not relevant to them (while paper surveys must contain all questions). Kenai River Recreation Use Study 2009 User Follow -up Survey The Kenai River supports the largest sport fishery in Alaska along with outstanding camping, boating, wildlife viewing, and other recreation. Everyone wants to protect the natural resources and experiences the river provides, but this takes careful planning. The following questions ask about your trips on the Kenai River, and your preferences for different facilities or ways of managing the river, By answering these questions, you can help Alaska State Parks (and other local, state, and federal agencies) provide high quality recreation opportunities in the future. There are no "right" or "wrong" answers; the best responses reflect your own opinions and beliefs. Please try to answer every question, because the study is interested in patterns of responses for the entire survey. Participation is voluntary, but we need your help. You were among the limited number of people we surveyed on the river through July, and your response is needed to accurately represent those users' views. Your experience on the Kenai River 1. People take different trips on the Kenai River. Using the map below to identify river segments, please indicate... ...all the types of trips you take in a typical year ...the two types of trips that are "most important to you All trips you take (check all that apply) l❑ Beach based dip netting at the mouth Boat -based dip netting near the mouth 0 Lower River bank fishing l;! Lower River powerboat -based fishing Lower River fishing from a driftboat /raft Lower River scenic floating (not fishing) Middle River bank fishing Middle River powerboat -based fishing Middle River fishing from a driftboat I raft Middle River scenic floating (not fishing) Upper River bank fishing Upper River fishing from a driftboat raft Upper River scenic floating (not fishing) Camping at a campground (anywhere on the river) Other (please spec'fy) 1st most important trip (check one) 0 0 0 0 2 most important trip (check one) 0 O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 Your experience on the Kenai River (continued) 2. For your "most important" type of trip, how often do you use a guide or other commercial services? (Check one for each) Never Sometimes Frequently Fishing guide with boat 1 2 3 Sightseeing rafting guide (with boat) 1 2 3 Boat rental with guide 1 2 3 Vehicle shuttle 1 2 3 3. For your 'most important' type of trip, do you camp from a boat? (Circle one) 1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Frequently 4. Do you own and on the river? 1. No skip to Question 11 on this page 2, Yes 5. Where is your land located? 1. Lower River {downstream of Sterling Highway Bridge in Soldotna) 2. Middle River (Sterling Highway Bridge upstream to Skilak Lake) 3. Upper River (Skilak Lake to Kenai Lake) 6. Is there a house /building on your property? 7, Do you live in the house? 8. Do you use a boat directly from your property? 9. Do you fish from your property? 1. No 1, No 1. No 1, No 2. Yes 2. Part -time 2. Yes 2. Yes For landowners only 3, Full -time 10. Do you have any of the following waterfront development on your property? (Check all that apply) Dock C❑ Fishing boardwalk Bank stabilization structure using mostly "natural" materials (tree stumps, spruce, willow plantings) Bank stabilization structure using mostly "other" materials (riprap, bulwarks, gabions) 11, Do you use a boat on your Kenai River trips (you don't have to own the boat)? 1. No skip to "Issue Importance" section on next page 2. Yes 12. Please indicate (1) all the boats you use and (2) the boat you use most often. Kayak or canoe Driftboat Raft or multi person catar One person cataraft or "fishcat" Powerboa Other (specify): All boats you use (Check all that apply) 0 Page 2 17)1'16 0 Boat you use most often (Check one) 13. If you use a driftboat or raft, do you use a 'kicker' motor? (Check all that apply) No, I never use a motor on my driftboat or raft Yes, for traveling against the tide or wind on the Lower River Yes, for trolling short segments of the Middle River Yes, for traveling upstream to re -drift short segments on the Middle River Yes, for access to the Middle River (then returning to Lower Skilak launch) Yes, for crossing Skilak after a Kenai Canyon trip For boat users only 14. If you use a powerboat, please indicate its length, hull shape, and type of motor, (if you own more than one boat, answer for the one you use most often) Length: feet Hull shape: 1. Vee or semi -vee 2. Flat bottom 3. Don't know 4. Other Type of motor: 1, Two- stroke (not legal in July) 2. Four- stroke or direct fuel injected 2- stroke (legal in July) Issue Importance The following have been mentioned as issues for managing recreation use on the Kenai River. Please indicate the importance of each issue to you. Unless a segment is specified, issues refer to the entire river in general. (Circle one number for each). Potential Issu Amount of river access for bank anglers Amount of facilities (launches, rest rooms, etc.) to handle use Trampling of shoreline vegetation by anglers Litter and human waste Bear -human interactions impacts of recreation use on wildlife along Boating safety Water clarity 1 turbidity Powerboat effects on bank erosion Hydrocarbon pollution levels Number of bank anglers during red salmon runs Number of boats on Lower River in July Number of boats on Lower River in other months Number of boats on Middle River during 2nd red salmon run Number of boats on Middle River after 2nd red salmon run Number of boats on Upper River during red salmon runs Number of boats on Upper River after mid August Number of scenic rafting tarps on Upper River Discourteous behavior by users Conflict between motorized and non motorized boaters Conflict between guides and unguided anglers Conflict between property owners and. anglers impacts of docks and boardwalks Visual impacts of private homes and buildings along river Other (please specify) Other (please specify) Page 3 of 16 Not at all' Slag( tly Moderately Very Extremely.. ikon t important important mportant :important: important kn:.nw: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2` 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X X X X Responding to Crowding 1. The popularity of the Kenai means that some segments and seasons can be crowded. In general, do you feel crowded on your Kenai River trips? (Circle one number) 1. I never feel crowded 3 skip to next section 2. I enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere skip to next section 3. I sometimes feel crowded (please answer the following questions about crowding) 2. If you feel crowded at some times, how do you generally cope with it? (Check all that apply) I go less frequently I resign myself to the new, more crowded experience I try to avoid other users (move to new fishing spots, etc.) in the same area l plan to use the same segment at a different time of day 1 plan to use the same segment during the middle of the week I plan to use the same segment during the off season i plan to use other river segments that are less crowded I plan to use other river segments at other times of the week i plan to use other river segments during another season I become dissatisfied I do other types of non -river recreation I go to another river (please specify below) 3. Do you make or modify trip plans based on information about how many people are using the river? 1, No 2. Yes Changing Conditions and Past Use 1 Do you think the overall quality of trips and management on Kenai River has improved, declined, or stayed the same over the years? (Circle one number). Substantially Slightly Stayed the Slightly Substantially Don't improved improved same declined declined know Overall quality of trips 1 2 3 4 5 X Agency management 1 2 3 4 5 X 2. Have you stopped visiting some segments in some months? (Circle one number). 1. No, I use the same segments and seasons I always have -4 SKIP TO PAGE 6 2. Yes, I have reduced my use of some segments in some months 3. Yes, I have stopped using some segments in some months Page 4of16 Changing Conditions and Past Use (continued) 3. For each segment where you've reduced or stopped your visits, check the reasons why. (Check all that apply for each segment) Possible reasons: Decline in fishing success Changes in fishing regulations Changes in motor regulations (no 2- strokes in July) Too many people Too many boats Too many powerboats (guided o To many guide boats Too many unguided boats Boating became unsafe Too much discourteous behavior Hard to find parking camping Prefer fishing in other locations I didn't want to contribute to crowding lil fishing partners consider it too crowded I fish with different people who go to other segments Now !fish from a boa I no longer use a boat Other (specify): Other (specify): July Month Page 5 of 16 Lower River Middle River Upper River Lower River 4. For each segment, please indicate the month(s) when you have reduced or stopped your visits. (Check all that apply) Middle River r unguided) 0 Upper River 0 une The remainder of the survey asks about management actions that might be used to address recreation impact problems. The questions are organized by sections as listed below. General management strategies Specific management actions for the entire river e Use limits Drift -only issues Guided /unguided use issues If you some issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use some segments), you can skip those sections... General Management Strategies There are several general management strategies used to address increasing use and visitor impacts in river corridors. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each strategy. (Circle one number per strategy). Strategy 8 Development issues o Fees Lower River specific actions Middle River specific actions Upper River specific actions Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know Develop new facilities (such as launches, day us areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume of use Expand or improve facilities to handle the volume of use Develop more access help redistribute use Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel /paved trails) to reduce impacts from use Boater safety education programs "Etiquette" education to address social impacts Regulabons to improve boating safety (suc wake zones speed limits in 'tbru lanes' "Leave no trace" education to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Limit use through permit reservation systems Zoning, regulations to separate conflicting users vs. bank anglers, motorized vs, non- motorized) 1 1 Page 6 of 16 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 X X X X Specific Management Actions for the Entire River Several specific management actions have been suggested for the entire Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action) ore restrooms in ;high use bank angler ar More fish cleaning stations in general Restrictions on number of fish allowed to cleaned when others are waiting Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants More fishing platforms 1 stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Increase patrols and litter pick -up at public easements Close more areas to bank fishing use is trampling vegetation More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling re fencing l signs to:± that can withstand the use Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re -open parts of them) Create brochures and internet media showing how to boat and fish during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license" for powerboat operators (includes a written test) Offer a one day course about how to operate boats doting high density periods Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel' regulations (particularly in silver season) Require all boaters to wear PFDs (life iackets) Other (please specify): Other (please speoi Strongly Slightly Neutral Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know as 1 2 2 1 1 Page 7 of 16 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 X X 4 5 X 4 5 X 4 5 X 4 5 X 4 5 X 4' 5 4 5 X Use Limits 1. Would you accept having to compete for a limited number of permits to use parts of the river if it meant there would be fewer other people on the river when you use it? (Circle one number) 1. Yes some limits on use are needed 2. Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available per day 3, Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse 4, No 111 always want unlimited access to the river 2. If a permit system were tried on one or more Kenai River segments, should it (Circle one number) 1. Reduce use compared to current levels 2. Freeze use near current levels 3, Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) 4. Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 5. I oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase 3. Some rivers require boaters to register every time they go boating. "Mandatory registration" could be developed for some segments of the Kenai, with the following characteristics: boaters could register by phone or via the Internet boaters would identify which segment they intended to use the number of boats that can register would not be limited a webpage would keep a "running tally' of registered boats for every segment and day Do you think a mandatory registration program should be developed for the Kenai? (Check all statements you agree with) No, because I'm opposed to mandatory programs like this. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which I oppose). No, because this is unnecessary on the segments I use. No, this will cost too much to administer. No, this will be difficult to enforce. Maybe, but it depends on how easy it is to register. Maybe, but it depends on how much it costs per registration. Maybe, but it depends on which segment and season it applies to, Yes, because information about the number of other boaters would help me plan my trips. Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which I support). Other: 4. Parking length limits at day use areas on the Lower and Middle River range from 4 to 12 hours (and some only apply during the late red salmon run), Do you support time limits to increase "turnover" during high use periods? (Circle one number) 1, No, day use parking should not have limits, 2. Yes, day use parking should have some limits. 3. Yes, and different lots should have different limits (depends on the site and its popularity). 4. This issue doesn't matter to me. 5. If you think there should be some parking length limits, what is the most appropriate limit? hours per visit Page 8of16 "Drift- only" Issues on the Lower and Middle River The following questions ask about "drift only issues on the Lower and Middle River. if these issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use these segments), skip to the next page. 1. Mondays in May, June, and July are' 'drift -only days" on the Lower and Middle River (from River Mile 4 to Skilak Lake). On these days, fishing from a motorized boat is not allowed (and guides are also not allowed). Some people have suggested adding more "drift-only days" on these segments, but with driftboat guiding allowed. Please tell us whether you support or oppose the following "drift -only" actions. (Circle one per row) In general, more "drift only" days should be added to the Middle River. If "drift only days are added, they sl ouid be on drfferer�t days nrn the twa segments so there will always be one segrnent avertable fo powerboats) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know in general ma )e 4 dri ft t my days should be addedto the Lower River 1 2 3 4 5 X 2. If you support adding "drift only" days, what is the maximum number that should be added per week? (Select one) O None: I oppose adding "drift only" days, O 1 (in addition to Mondays) 02 O 3 04 05 0 6 (Every day would be 'drift only') 3, If you support adding "drift only" days, in what months would you prefer them to be added? (Check any month(s) that apply) None; l oppose adding more "drift only days June July August September 4. If additional "drift only" days are added per week, which days would you prefer? (Check any day(s) that apply) None: I oppose adding more "drift only" days Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Sunday 5. If you have additional comments about 'drift only" issues, please make them here: Page 9 of 16 Guided 1 Unguided Use Issues Some unguided users have concerns about the number or behavior of guides; some guides have concerns about the number or behavior of unguided users. To help us understand these issues, please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Circle one number for each. if guided unguided use issues "don't matter" to you, leave this page blank) of guided boats can detract =from The total numbe experiences. Some guides tend to be more aggressive" (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or 7 cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). Aside from other issues some people are envious o that guided users catch more fish Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropri boat 1 equipment to fish in higher density areas, Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as 1 2 3 4 drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa). Some unguided users don't know the "rules for o driving, on the river and create safety hazards. Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. eeds one group is the.problem, everyone share the burden of.reducing'mpacts The burden of reducing impacts should be S proportional to the group that is causing the impacts: 0 Limiting use. idea use is a good Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. if you have any additional comments about guide 1 unguided use issues on the Kenai, please make them here: Page 10 of 16 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 X 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X Development Issues 1. Public and private land owners on the Kenai River are currently allowed to develop up to one -third of their riverfront property with docks or fishing platforms. For the entire river, at least 12% of the river's banks have been developed. Based on this information and your experience, how much development is appropriate from a visual perspective? (Please check one response for each segment you visit). Development should be reduced Lower River 1 Middle River Upper River 1 Keep it near current levels 2 2 in general, er ritting requir meats fir; docks, boardalks,,and erosion o structures are too restrictive. Allow it to Allow it to increase increase slightly substantially 3 2 3 Page 11 of 16 4 4 Allow it to Allow it double to triple 5 5 6 6 4. If you have any additional comments about development issues on the Kenai, please make them here: I'm uncomfortable answering this (please specify why below) X X X 2. If you are uncomfortable estimating an appropriate level of bankside development, check all reasons that apply. Of you identified a development level above, leave this question blank). I just don't know I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount, I care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type and location of development. I don't care about visual impacts as long as there is no net loss" of fish habitat, I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation access facilities. 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about land use regulations and development along the Kenai River. (Circle one response per row) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know In general, existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the river from over- 1 2 3 4 5 X development. Fees 1. Management of the Kenai River (facility maintenance, river patrols, etc.) is currently funded by state and federal revenues. Would you be willing to pay a "user fee" on the Kenai (beyond launch or other facility fees already charged), assuming that all revenues would be returned to help manage the river? 1. No 2, Yes 2. How much would you be willing to pay? dollars per day dollars per season Lower River Specific Actions Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Lower Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. if you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know New launch in Cunningham Park (mile S) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and docks at Pillars (mile 12.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) 1proverestrooms and access across tidal mud' Cunningham Park (mile 6) New boat restrooms near Mud Is. Beaver Creek (mile 10) Page 12 of 16 2 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Limit the number of guided boats per day in July Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of ail boats (guided or unguided) in ,fu through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat registration numbers (even numbers on even dates, odd 1 2 3 4 5 X numbers on odd dates) Other (please specify): Other (please specify): 5 X Lower River Boat "Capacity" 1. In recent years, Lower River counts indicate the number of boats at one time during prime hours in July are... Typically 200 to 300 boats early in the month Typically 300 to 400 boats later in the month May exceed 450 boats a few days each year (usually Tuesdays and Saturdays later in the month) Were generally lower in 2009 due to low king returns; few counts exceeded 300 boats Counts include boats that are fishing and traveling on the river Counts refer to 16 miles of river from Warren Ames Bridge (mile 5) to Sterling. Hwy Bridge 21) Because boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, people may encounter fewer boats than these counts, However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes' above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. (Circle one number per row; if you checked "no" responses, leave blank) On higher use days (such as 100 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000 1,500 Other: Tuesdays and Saturdays in late July) On other days 100 200 300 4 Lower River Guided Boat "Capacity" 0 er; Page 13 of 16 600 000 1,000 1. The peak number of guide boats on the Lower River at one time during "guide hours" (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesday through Saturday) has varied over the years. In recent years in July, there are typically 100 to 150, with some peaks about 200. There are lower numbers in other months. Because guided boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, boaters may encounter fewer guided boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable guide capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of guided boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised, Can you make a "guided boat capacity estimate" for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, I object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats No, it depends on how guided boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit guided boats, which I oppose No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of guided boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the maximum number of guided boats that should be on the Lower River at one time. (Circle one number per row. If you checked any of the "no" responses, leave this question blank). in July Middle River Specific Actions 50 100 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Middle Kenai River, Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action, If you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) New launch on Funny River Road across from Morgan's (mile 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat restrooms near Kiley River outlet New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet No wake zones in high density areas such as Swiftwater, Dot's Landing, or 3rd Hole" near Kiley River Regulations that maintain an open 'driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Require reservations for on- river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on -river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Restrict drift boats from traveling upstream using kickers (to minimize large wakes) Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Page 14 of 16 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 1 1 3 4 Other: 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X Other (please specify) Other (please specify): Upper River Specific Actions 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Upper Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action, (Check one response per action. if you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) Upper River Boat "Capacity" During red salmon runs At other times 4 Require reservations for Oft-river r campin isites Organize the "spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Develop fire education 1 enforcement program in Russian River area Limit the number of unguided boa and Jim's Landing per day through a rese (guided boats are already limited) Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Other (please specify): Other (please specify): s n Sportsman's r ation syste 1, Upper River boating counts have increased in recent years. For 2004, the latest year with accurate data, the number of boats passing the ferry per day in the fishing season... averaged about 60 boats per day on weekdays averages about 100 boats per day on weekends peaked over 200 boats per day on high use weekends (during red salmon runs) guided use is already limited on this segment, and typically ranges from 15 to 20 boats per day Because everyone travels downstream, there are multiple channels, and there are many daylight hours, people may encounter many fewer boats than these "per day" counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a 'reasonable boat capacity estimate' for the Upper River —the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Upper River (specifically from Sportsman's Landing to Jim's Landing)? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed D No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but 1 don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" on the Sportsman's to Jim's Landing segment the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. (If you checked any of the "no" responses above, leave this question blank). 50 75 100 150 Page 15of16 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 200 2 2 3 4 5 X 2 250 3 4 3 4 5 X 300 400 50' 75 100 150 200 250 300 4000. Other: 5 X X Final Questions About You 1. How old are you? 2. Are you? years 1. Female 2, Male 3, Are you an Alaska resident? 1. No 2, Yes 4. if you live in the Kenai watershed (Cooper Landing, Sterling, Soldotna, Kenai), please estimate the number of days you hosted friends or family (from Alaska or out of state) in 2009. I hosted family friends from out of state about days in 2009 I hosted family friends from Alaska about days in 2009 5. If you were a visitor to the Kenai River in 2009, where did you stay in the area? (Check all that apply). Family and friends Hotels motels B &B Camped in a campground Camped in the backcountry I'm not a visitor; I have a residence in the area. 6, If you were a visitor in 2009, how many days did you stay on the Kenai Peninsula and in Alaska? total days on the Kenai Peninsula total days in Alaska Thank you for completing the survey! Please mail it back to us in the self- addressed and stamped envelope provided. If you have additional comments about the Kenai River or how it should be managed, please make them below, If you have additional questions, please contact Doug Whittaker at KenaiRiverRecreationStudy @alaska.gov Page 16 of 16 Kenai River Recreation Use Study 2009 Guide Survey Throughout this summer, some of your clients and other river users have been asked to fill out an Alaska State Parks survey on the Kenai River. They were also asked to complete a follow -up survey by email or mail. We would appreciate your help on the "guide' version of this follow -up survey, which is being sent to every guide registered with State Parks in 2009. The Kenai River supports the largest sport fishery in Alaska along with outstanding camping, boating, wildlife viewing, and other recreation. Everyone wants to protect the natural resources and experiences the river provides, but this takes careful planning, This survey asks about your guided trips on the Kenai River, and your preferences for managing the river. By answering these questions, you can help Alaska State Parks (and other local, state, and federal agencies) provide high quality recreation opportunities in the future. There are no "right' or "wrong" answers; the best responses reflect your own opinions and beliefs. Please try to answer every question, because the study is interested in patterns of responses across all the questions. Participation is voluntary, but we need your help. We know the guides know a lot about the river and have strong opinions about how it should be managed. This is an opportunity to weigh -in on several management issues. Your experience on the Kenai River 1. Guides offer different types of trips on the Kenai River. Using the map below to identify river segments, please check t. ,,.all the different types of guided trips you offer in an "average" year ,..the two types of trips that are most important to you" All trips you take (check all that apply) Lo wer River bank fishing Lower River powerboat -based fishing Lower River fishing from a driftboat 1 raft Lower River scenic floating (not fishing) Middle River bank fishing Middle River powerboat -based fishing Middle River fishing from a driftboat raft Middle River scenic floating (not fishing) Upper River bank fisting Upper River fishing from a driftboat raft Upper River scenic floating (not fishing) O 1s most 2nd most important trip important trip (check one) (check one) O 0 O O O O O O o' 0 O O Your experience on the Kenai River (continued) 2. How many years have you been fishing or boating on the Kenai? years 3. How many years have you been a registered guide (fishing or scenic trips) on the Kenai? years 4. In an 'average" year (don't include 2009), how many (1) days per year and (2) clients per year do you guide on the Kenai River? (it's okay to provide rough estimates) days per year clients per year 5, For 2009, do you expect to guide fewer, about the same, or more than you indicated above? Many fewer Fewer About the same Mare Many more (Over 30% less) (5 to 30% less) (plus /minus 5 (5 to 30% more (Over 30% more) Days in 2009 2 3 4 5 Clients in 2009 1 2 6. If you guide from a powerboat on the Lower River, please check the launch you use most often. D Private dock near Beaver Creek D Eagle Rock D Pillars D Stewart's Cho's Poacher's Cove D Other private dock on Lower River D Centennial D Swiftwater D Other (please specify): 7. If you guide from a powerboat on the Middle River, please check the launch you use most often. D Centennial D Swiftwater D Izaak Walton D Bings Landing D Lower Skilak U Other private dock on Middle River D Other (please specify): 8. Do you own land on the river? 1. No skip to Question 15 on next page 2. Yes Page 2 018 9. Where is your land located? 1. Lower River (downstream of Sterling Highway Bridge in Soldotna) 2. Middle River (Sterling Highway Bridge upstream to Skilak Lake) 3. Upper River Skilak Lake to Kenai Lake) 10. Is there a house /building on your property? 11, Do you live in the house? 12. Do you use a boat directly from your property? 13, Do you fish from your property? 1. No 1. No 1. No 1, No 2. Yes 2, Part -time 2. Yes 2, Yes For landowners only 3. Full -time 14. Do you have any of the following waterfront development on your property? (Check all that apply) Dock Fishing boardwalk Bank stabilization structure using mostly "natural" materials (tree stumps, spruce, willow plantings) D Bank stabilization structure using mostly "other" materials (riprap, bulwarks, gabions) 15. What boats do you use on the Kenai and which boat do use most often for guiding? (Note: You don't have to own the boat or use it for guiding to check it). Kayak or canoe Driftboat Raft or multi person catara One person cataraft or "fishcat" Powerboat Other (specify): All boats you use (Check all that apply) Page 3 018 16. If you use a driftboat or raft, do you use a 'kicker" motor? (Check all that apply) No, I never use a motor on my driftboat or raft Yes, for traveling against the tide or wind on the Lower River D Yes, for trolling short segments of the Middle River Yes, for traveling upstream to re -drift short segments on the Middle River Yes, for access to the Middle River (then returning to Lower Skilak launch) Yes, for crossing Skilak after a Kenai Canyon trip Boat you use most often (Check one) 0 O 14. If you use a powerboat, please indicate its length, hull shape, and type of motor, (If you own more than one boat, answer for the one you use most often) Lencth: feet Hull shape: 1. Vee or semi -vee 2. Flat bottom 3. Don't know 4, Other Motor type: 1, Two-stroke (not legal in July) 2. Four- stroke or direct fuel injected 2- stroke (legal in July) Issue Importance The following have been mentioned as issues for managing recreation use on the Kenai River. Please indicate the importance of each issue to you. Unless a segment is specified, issues refer to the entire river in general. (Circle one number for each). Amount of river access for bank anglers Amount of facilities (launches, rest rooms et Trampling of shoreline vegetation by anglers Litter and human waste Bear -human interactions Impacts of recreation use on wildlife along the river Boating safety Water clarity turbidity Powerboat effects on bank erosion Other (please speci)1) Page 4 of 18 Not at all Slightly Moderately important important important u nparta it f oha 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 4 X Hydrocarbon pollution levels Number of bank anglers during red salmon runs Number of boats on Lower River in July Number of boats on Lower River in other months Number of boats on Mddte River durng 2nd red salrnon run Number of boats on Middle River after 2nd red salmon run Number of boats on Upper f vrerdurlr red salmon runs Number of boats on Upper River after mid August Number of scenic raftvngg tips on Upper River Discourteous behavior by users Conflict between motorized and non- motorized 'boate Conflict between guides and unguided anglers Conflict between property owners and anglers Visual impacts of docks and boardwalks Visual impacts of private homes and buildings along rtv Other (please specify) 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2? 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X X 1 2 3 4 5 X X X X 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1' 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 X X 1 2 3 4 5 X 4 2 3 4 5 X X X X X X Responding to Crowding 1. The popularity of the Kenai means that some segments and seasons can be crowded. In general, do you feel crowded when guiding your Kenai River trips? (Circle one number) 1. I never feel crowded skip to next section 2. I enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere skip to next section 3. I sometimes feel crowded (please answer the following questions about crowding) 2. If you feel crowded at some times, how do you generally cope with it? (Check all that apply) I guide less frequently I try to prepare my clients for the more crowded experience I try to avoid other users (move to new fishing spots, etc.) in the same area I plan to use the same segment at a different time of day I plan to use the same segment during the middle of the week I plan to use the same segment during the off season I plan to use other river segments that are less crowded I plan to use other river segments at other times of the week I plan to use other river segments during another season I become dissatisfied I plan to guide on another river (please specify below) Changing Conditions and Past Use 1. Do you think the (1) overall quality of trips and (2) management on Kenai River has improved, declined, or stayed the same over the years? (Circle one number for each row), Substantially Slightly Stayed the Slightly Substantially Don't improved improved same declined declined know Overall quality of trips 1 2 3 4 5 X Agency management 1 2 3 4 5 X 2. Have you stopped guiding some segments in some months? (Circle one number). 1. No, I guide the same segments and seasons 1 always have SKIP TO PAGE 6 2, Yes, I have reduced my guiding use of some segments in some months 3. Yes, I have stopped guiding some segments in some months Page 5 of 18 Changing Conditions and Past Use (continued) 3. For each segment where you've reduced or stopped your visits, check the reasons why. (Check all that apply for each segment) Decline in fishing success anges in fishing regulations Changes in motor regulations (no 2- strokes in July) Too rnany people Too many boats Too many powerboats (guided or unguided) Too many guide boats To o many unguided boats Boating became unsafe Too much discourteous behavior Hard to find parking camping Prefer fishing in other locations didn't want to contribute to crowding My fishing partners consider it too crowded I fish with different people who go to other segments Now 1 fish from a boat I no longer use a boat June July A ugust September Possible reasons: Lower River Middle River Upper River Month Page 6of18 Other (specify): 4, For each segment, please indicate the month(s) when you have reduced or stopped your visits, (Check all that apply) Lower River Middle River Upper River Ll 0 King Salmon Fishing Use and Trends on the Lower and Middle Rivers The following questions ask about guided king salmon fishing from a powerboat on the Lower and Middle River, If you do not guide for king salmon from a powerboat, skip to the next section. 1. Please rate the importance of the following factors in determining when, where, and how long you take your clients fishing: My personal knowledge of a specific location Fishing', reports from recent days Fishing reports from others while you are on the river (via phones, radio, conversations) Personal success at a location from recent days Sonar counts information from /about +Fish Game netting boat Tidal information Water level information Water clarity Seeing many boats at a location Seeing few other boats at a location Seeing other boats having success (nets up) Back trolling Back bouncing Drifting (or dragging) Fishing from an anchor Not at all Sl ightly Moderately Very Extremely portant important important important important It is close to the launch I use Client preferences for a specific location Other In general... being among the first boats at a location guide hours open (at 6 am) Is importa for fishing success. ...aside from tidal considerations, king salmon fishing is generally better in the morning and diminishes through the day. 4 'i 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 7 of 18 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements, 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Strongly Slightly Neither Slightly Strongly disagree disagree agree agree 5 Don't know 6 3. When you are guiding clients for king salmon, about what percent of time do you use the following techniques (Your response must sum to 100 for example 25% 25% 25% 25% 100%). 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following general statements about king salmon fishing trends aver the last five years. In general... rnore boats refish €rig farther downst (betow ADF &G king sonar). more boats are fishing the tides." Strongly Slightly Neither Slightly Strongly disagree disagree agree agree re boats are back bouncing than back trolling ...fewer boats are recognizing traditional "drifting" or "dragging" (not back trolling) areas. ore power boats fish from an ancr ..,there are more unguided boats during guide hours (6 -6 Tue thru Sat) ..there are more rental boats d hours. ..,there are more non motorized boats during guide hours. there are more fnexpe during wide hours 1 1 Page Bof18 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 Don't know 6 6 6 3 4 5 6 fenced boaters 5. Please provide additional comments you have about king salmon fishing use or trends (including comments about how fishing may have been different in 2009 than previous years). The remainder of the survey asks about management actions that might be used to address recreation impact problems. The questions are organized by sections as listed below. General management strategies Development issues Specific management actions for the entire river Fees Use limits Lower River specific actions Drift -only issues Middle River specific actions Guided /unguided use issues Upper River specific actions If you some issues "don't matter" to you (or you don? use some segments), you can skip those sections.,. General Management Strategies There are several general management strategies used to address increasing use and visitor impacts in river corridors, Please tell us whether you support or oppose each strategy, (Circle one number per strategy). Strategy lie relop n +facilit s (such as lauracttes, day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle:df e,volume of use Expand or improve facilities to handle the volume of use ss =used sections of river to Develop more access help redistribute use Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel/paved trails) to reduce impacts from use Boater safety education programs "Etiquette" education to address social impacts Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits in "thru lanes "Leave no trace" education to address biophysical loss) Regulations to address biophysical ;impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Limit use through permit reservation systems Zoning regulations to separate conflicting users (boat vs, bank anglers, motorized vs. non motorized) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 Page 9of18 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 X X Specific Management Actions for the Entire River Several specific management actions have been suggested for the entire Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action) re restrooms in high use;" bank angler areas More fish cleaning stations in general Restrictions on number offish allowed cleaned when "others are Waiting Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants More fishing platforms stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Increase patrols and litter pick -up at public easements Close more areas to bank fishing use is trampling vegetation More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling More fencing J signs to direct that can withstand the use Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re -open parts of them) Create. brochures and intern et media. showing h to boat and -fish during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license" for powerboat operators (includes a written test) Offer a one day course about how to operat during high density periods Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel'' regulations (particularly in silver season) Require all boaters to "wear PDs"(life jackets) Other (please specify): Other "(pl Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 2 2 4 4 5 5 X X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X Page 10 of 18 Use Limits 1. Would you accept having to compete for a limited number of permits to use parts of the river if it meant there would be fewer other people on the river when you use it? (Circle one number) 1. Yes some limits on use are needed 2. Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available per day 3. Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse 4. No I'll always want unlimited access to the river 2. If a permit system were tried on one or more Kenai River segments, should it... (Circle one number) 1 Reduce use compared to current levels 2. Freeze use near current levels 3. Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) 4. Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 5. I oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase 3. Some rivers require boaters to register every time they go boating. "Mandatory registration" could be developed for some segments of the Kenai, with the following characteristics: boaters could register by phone or via the Internet boaters would identify which segment they intended to use the number of boats that can register would not be limited a webpage would keep a "running tally" of registered boats for every segment and day Do you think a mandatory registration program should be developed for the Kenai? (Check all statements you agree with) No, because I'm opposed to mandatory programs like this. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which I oppose). No, because this is unnecessary on the segments I use. O No, this will cost too much to administer. O No, this will be difficult to enforce. Maybe, but it depends on haw easy it is to register. Maybe, but it depends on how much it costs per registration. Maybe, but it depends on which segment and season it applies to. Yes, because information about the number of other boaters would help me plan my trips. O Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which I support). Other: 4. Parking length limits at day use areas on the Lower and Middle River range from 4 to 12 hours (and some only apply during the late red salmon run). Do you support time limits to increase "turnover" during high use periods? (Circle one number) 1, No, day use parking should not have limits. 2, Yes, day use parking should have some limits, 3, Yes, and different lots should have different limits (depends on the site and its popularity). 4, This issue doesn't matter to me. 5. If you think there should be some parking length limits, what is the most appropriate limit? hours per visit Page 11of18 "Drift-only" issues on the Lower and Middle River if these issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use these segments), skip to the next page. 1. Mondays in May, June, and July are "drift -only days" on the Lower and Middle River (from River Mile 4 to Skilak Lake). On these days, fishing from a motorized boat is not allowed (and guides are also not allowed). Some people have suggested adding more "drift -only days' on these segments. but with driftboat guiding allowed, Please tell us whether you support or oppose the following "drift-only" actions. (Circle one per row) In general, more "drift on to the Lower River. In general, more "drift only' days should be added to the Middle River. ff "daft only" days are added they; should a on r1�f#erent days an the Iwo.segments (so there will alwaysbe aria segment available for powerboats). Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 Page 12 of 18 2 0 5 3 6. If you answered "definitely no" or "probably no," check any reasons that apply: I prefer guiding from a powerboat My clients prefer powerboat -based fishing Physical demands of rowing Drift-based fishing can't match powerboat -based success rates 0 Less flexibility to reach "hot" fishing locations Requires learning new ways and places to fish Logistical challenges (arranging shuttles will be too complicated or costly) Existing launches do not offer enough good trip length options I don't have a driftboat raft to use for guiding O Other (please specify) If you have additional comments about "drift only" issues, please make then here: 4 5 0 6 (Every day would be "drift only X 2, If you support adding "drift only" days, what is the maximum number that should be added per week? (Select one) 4 None: I oppose adding "drift only" days. 0 4 O 1 (in addition to Mondays) 02 O 3 3. if you support adding "drift only" days, in what months would you prefer them to be added? (Check all that apply) None; I oppose adding more "drift only" days August June September July 4, If additional "drift only" days are added per week, which days would you prefer? (Check all that apply) None: I oppose adding more "drift only" days Friday Tuesday Saturday 0 Wednesday Sunday Thursday 5, If additional "drift only" days are added per week, would you offer guided driftboat fishing or sightseeing trips on those days (assume guides would be allowed to operate)? O Definitely no 0 Probably yes O Probably no 0 Definitely yes Guided l Unguided Use Issues Some unguided users have concerns about the number or behavior of guides; some guides have concerns about the number or behavior of unguided users, To help us understand these issues, please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements, (Circle one number for each. if guided unguided use issues "don't matter" to you, leave this page blank) guided boats can detract from The total num Some guides tend to be more aggressive' (such as s) getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). c Aside from other issues, some people are envio o that guided users catch rnore.fish, Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat equipment to fish in higher density areas Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa). Some ung riled users'don't know the "rule driving on the'riverand create,safety hazards.; Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. No one group is the problem,; everyone n share the burden of reducing ;iripacts. The burden of reducing impacts should be S proportional to the group that is causing the impacts, Limiting use. Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. Page 13 ofl8 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X guided use is good way to r educe overa 1 2 3 4 5 X If you have any additional comments about guide unguided use issues on the Kenai, please make them here Development Issues 1. Public and private land owners on the Kenai River are currently allowed to develop up to one -third of their riverfront property with docks or fishing platforms. For the entire river, at least 12% of the river's banks have been developed. Based on this information and your experience, how much development is appropriate from a visual perspective? (Please check one response for each segment you visit). Fees 1. No 2. Yes Development should be reduced Lower River 1 Middle River Upper River 1 Keep it near current levels 2 dollars per day dollars per season 2 lrr general, permitting requirements for docks, boardwalks,.,and erosion control structures are too restrictive. 2. How much would you be willing to pay? Allow it to Allow it to increase increase slightly substantially 3 3 Page 14 of 18 4 4 Strongly Slightly disagree disagree Allow it to Allow it double to triple 5 5 Neutral 6 6 4. If you have any additional comments about development issues on the Kenai, please make them here: I'm uncomfortable answering this (please specify why below) X X 2. if you are uncomfortable estimating an appropriate level of bankside development, check all reasons that apply. (lf you identified a development level above, leave this question blank). i just don't know D I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount. D I care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type and location of development. D I don't care about visual impacts as long as there is "no net loss" of fish habitat. I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation access facilities, 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about land use regulations and development along the Kenai River, (Circle one response per row) Slightly Strongly Don't agree agree know In general, existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the river from over- 1 2 3 4 5 X development. 1. Management of the Kenai River (facility maintenance, river patrols, etc.) is currently funded by state and federal revenues. Would you be willing to pay a "user fee" on the Kenai (beyond launch or other facility fees already charged), assuming that all revenues would be returned to help manage the river? Lower River Specific Actions Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Lower Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 4 X' New launch in Cunningham Park (mile 6) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and docks at Pillars (mile 12,5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) Improve restrooms and access across tidal mud at Cunningham Park (mile 6) New boat restrooms near Mud Is. Beaver Creek (mile 10) No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Limit the number of guided boats per day in July Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of ail boats (guided or unguided through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Other (please specify) Page 15 of 18 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 X X i X X 2 3 4 5 X X registration numbers (even numbers on even dates, odd 1 2 3 4 5 X numbers on odd dates) Lower River Boat "Capacity" 1. In recent years, Lower River counts indicate the number of boats at one time during prime hours in July are„, Typically 200 to 300 boats early in the month and 300 to 400 boats later in the month May exceed 450 boats a few days each year (usually Tuesdays and Saturdays later in the month) Were generally lower in 2009 due to low king returns; few counts exceeded 300 boats Counts include boats that are fishing and traveling on the river Counts refer to 16 miles of river from Warren Ames Bridge (mile 5) to Sterling Hwy Bridge (mile 21) Because boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, people may encounter fewer boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed D No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish O No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. (Circle one number per row) On higher use days (such as 100 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000 1 Other: Tuesdays and Saturdays in late July) On other days 100 200 300 400 500 600 ti00 1,000 9,500 (Other. Lower River Guide Capacity 1. The peak number of guide boats on the Lower River at one time during "guide hours" (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesday through Saturday) has varied over the years. In recent years in July, there are typically 100 to 150, with some peaks about 200. There are lower numbers in other months. Because guided boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, boaters may encounter fewer guided boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable guide capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of guided boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a "guided boat capacity estimate" for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, I object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats No, it depends on how guided boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit guided boats, which I oppose No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, 1 care about the number of guided boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the maximum number of guided boats that should be on the Lower River at one time. (Circle one number per row). In July 50 100 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 Other: 50 100 150 200 250 300 Page 16 of 16 Middle River Specific Actions 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Middle Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. If you don? know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) New launch on Funny River R Morgan's (mile 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat restrooms near Killey River outlet New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet No wake zones in high density areas each as Swiftwater, Dot's Landing, or lrd Hole" near Kelley River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas psites between Require reservations for on rive Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on -river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Restrict drift boats from traveling up kickers (to minimize large wakes) Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit the number of guides (in general) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 2 3 1 2 3 Limit the number of ail boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Other (please specify): Other (please specify): Page 17o(18 4 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X Upper River Specific Actions 1, Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Upper Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. if you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) X?l Require reservations for on rivercamping':sites Organize the "spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Develop fire education enforcement program in Russian River area Limit the number of unguided boats between Sportsman and Jim's Landing per day through a reservation syste (guided boats are already limited) Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Other (please specify): Upper River Boat "Capacity" 1 Upper River boating counts have increased in recent years. For 2004, the latest year with accurate data, the number of boats passing the ferry per day in the fishing season.,, averaged about 60 boats per day on weekdays averages about 100 boats per day on weekends peaked over 200 boats per day on high use weekends (during red salmon runs) guided use is already limited on this segment, and typically ranges from 15 to 20 boats per day Because everyone travels downstream, there are multiple channels, and there are many daylight hours, people may encounter many fewer boats than these "per day' counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable boat capacity estimate" for the Upper River the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Upper River (specifically from Sportsman's Landing to Jim's Landing)? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" on the Sportsman's to Jim's Landing segment -the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised, (If you checked any of the "no" responses above, leave this question blank). During red salmon runs At...otier times' 50 75 100 150 Page 18 of 18 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 200 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 250 300 400 Other: 150 200 250 300 400 Qther; Thanks for completing the survey! Please mail it back in the self-addressed and stamped envelope provided. Kenai River Recreation Use Study 2009 Landowner Survey Throughout this summer, Alaska State Parks has been conducting a survey of river users on the Kenai. As part of the study, we are also surveying a sample of landowners. You can help the study by completing this survey. The Kenai River supports the largest sport fishery in Alaska along with outstanding camping, boating, wildlife viewing, and other recreation. Everyone wants to protect the natural resources and experiences the river provides, but this takes careful planning. This survey asks about your trips on the Kenai River, and your preferences for managing the river. By answering these questions, you can help Alaska State Parks (and other local, state, and federal agencies) provide high quality recreation opportunities in the future. There are no "right" or "wrong" answers; the best responses reflect your own opinions and beliefs, Please try to answer every question, because the study is interested in patterns of responses for the entire survey, Participation is voluntary, but we need your help. You are among a limited number of landowners we are asking to complete this survey, and your response is needed to accurately represent landowner views. Your experience on the Kenai River 1, People take different trips on the Kenai River. Using the map below to identify river segments, please indicate... ...all the types of trips you take in a typical year ...the two types of trips that are 'most important to you All trips you take (check all that apply) Beach based dip netting at the mout Boat -based dip netting near the mouth Lower River bank fishing Lower River powerboat -based fishing Lower River fishing from a driftboat raft Lower River scenic floating (not fishing) Middle River bank fishing Middle River powerboat -based fishing Middle River fishing from a driftboat raft Middle River scenic floating (not fishing) Upper River bank fishing Upper River fishing from a driftboat raft Upper River scenic floating (not fishing) Other (please specify): LI 1St most important trip (check one) 0 O 2nd most important trip (check one) 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 2. For your "most important" type of trip, how often do you use a guide or other commercial services? Fishing guide with boat Sightseeing 1 rafting guide (with boat) Boat rental with guide Vehicle shuttle 4, is there a house /building on your property? 5. Do you live in the house? 6, Do you use a boat directly from your property? 7. Do you fish from your property? 1 3. Where is your land located? 1, Lower River (downstream of Sterling Highway Bridge in Soldotna) 2. Middle River (Sterling Highway Bridge upstream to Skilak Lake) 3. Upper River (Skilak Lake to Kenai Lake) 1. No 1. No 1. No 1. No 2 8. Do you have any of the following waterfront development on your property? (Check all that apply) Dock Fishing boardwalk Bank stabilization structure using mostly "natural" materials (tree stumps, spruce, willow plantings) Bank stabilization structure using mostly "other" materials (riprap, bulwarks, gabions) 9. Do anglers or other river users trespass on your property? No Skip to next section Yes 10. Check all the types of trespassing that occurs on your property... Bank anglers fishing on my property (above ordinary high water) Bank anglers crossing my property on their way to/from a fishing location Anglers parking vehicles on my property Anglers parking vehicles that block road access to my property Unguided boaters launching or taking -out their boats on my property Guides launching or taking -out their boats on my property Guides dropping off anglers to fish Guides dropping off clients to go to the bathroom Other (please explain) 11. Do you use a boat on your Kenai River trips (you don't have to own the boat)? 1, No 2. Yes Never Sometimes Frequently Page 2 of 16 2. Yes 2. Part -time 2. Yes 2. Yes 3 3. Full -time 2. Please indicate (1) all the boats you use and (2) the boat you use most often. All boats you use Boat you use most often (Check all that apply) (Check one) kayak Or carne P. O Driftboat 0 Raft or multi- person cataraft Li 0 One person cataraft or "fishcat' 0 Powerboat lJ 0 3. If you use a driftboat or raft, do you use a "kicker" motor? (Check all that apply) No, I never use a motor on my driftboat or raft Yes, for traveling against the tide or wind on the Lower River Yes, for trolling short segments of the Middle River Yes, for traveling upstream to re -drift short segments on the Middle River Yes, for access to the Middle River (then returning to Lower Skilak launch) Yes, for crossing Skilak after a Kenai Canyon trip 4. If you use a powerboat, please indicate its length, hull shape, and type of motor. (If you own more than one boat, answer for the one you use most often) Length: feet Hull shape: 1, Vee or semi -vee 2. Flat bottom 3. Don't know 4. Other Type of motor: 1. Two- stroke (not legal in July) 2. Four stroke or direct fuel injected 2- stroke (legal in July) issue Importance The following have been mentioned as issues for managing recreation use on the Kenai River. Please indicate the importance of each issue to you. Unless a segment is specified, issues refer to the entire river in general. (Circle one number for each), Amount of river access for bank anglers ,mount of facilities paunches, rest rooms, etc.) to handle ,use Trampling of shoreline vegetation by anglers Litter and human waste Bear -human interactions Impacts of recreation use on wildlife along the river Boating safety Water clarity f turbidity Powerboat effects on bank erosion Hydrocarbon pollution levels Number of bank anglers during red salmon runs Number of boats on Lower River in July Number of boats on Lower River in other months Number of boats on Middle River during 2nd red salmon: run Number of boats on Middle River after 2nd red salmon run Number of boats on Upper River during red salmon runs Number of boats on Upper River after mid August Number of scenic rafting trips on Upper River Discourteous behavior by users Conflict between motorized and non motorized boaters Conflict between guides and unguided anglers Conflict between property owners and anglers Visual impacts of docks and boardwalks Visual impacts of private homes and buildings along river Other (please specify) Other (j)lease specify) Potential Issue Not at all Sti hliy Moderately Very Extremely Don't iportant import'ar t important important im portant kn 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 Page 3of16 1 1 1' 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X Responding to Crowding 1. The popularity of the Kenai means that some segments and seasons can be crowded. In general, do you feel crowded on your Kenai River trips? (Circle one number) 1. I never feel crowded 4 skip to next section 2. I enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere 4 skip to next section 3. I sometimes feel crowded (please answer the following questions about crowding) 2. If you feel crowded at some times, how do you generally cope with it? (Check all that apply) I go less frequently I resign myself to the new, more crowded experience I try to avoid other users (move to new fishing spots, etc.) in the same area I plan to use the same segment at a different time of day I plan to use the same segment during the middle of the week I plan to use the same segment during the off season I plan to use other river segments that are less crowded I plan to use other river segments at other times of the week I plan to use other river segments during another season I become dissatisfied I do other types of non -river recreation I go to another river (please specify below) 3. Do you make or modify trip plans based on information about how many people are using the river? 1.No 2. Yes Changing Conditions and Past Use 1. Do you think the overall quality of trips and management on Kenai River has improved, declined, or stayed the same over the years? (Circle one number). Substantially Slightly Stayed the Slightly Substantially Don't improved improved same declined declined know Overall quality of trips 1 2 3 4 5 X Agency management 1 2 3 4 5 X 2. Have you stopped visiting some segments in some months? (Circle one number). 1. No, I use the same segments and seasons I always have 4 SKIP TO PAGE 6 2. Yes, I have reduced my use of some segments in some months 3. Yes, I have stopped using some segments in some months Page 4of16 3. For each segment where you've reduced or stopped your visits, check the reasons why. (Check all that apply for each segment) Decline in fishing success Changes in fishing regulations Changes in motor regulations (no 2- strokes in July) Too many people Too many boats Too many powerboats (guided cr unguided) Too many guide boats Too many unguided boats Boating became unsafe Too much discourteous behavior Hard to find parking camping Prefer fishing in offer lo catio 1 didn't want to contribute to crowding My fish €rig partners consider it too crowded f; 1 fish with different people who go to other segments Now 1 fish from a boat 1 no longer use a boat Other (specify) Other (specify): Juba July August September Possible reasons: Month Page 5of 16 Lower River Middle River Upper River ns 4. For each segment, please indicate the month(s) when you have reduced or stopped your visits. (Check all that apply) Lower River Middle River Cl CI CI 1❑ Upper River The remainder of the survey asks about management actions that might be used to address recreation impact problems. The questions are organized by sections as listed below. General management strategies Specific management actions for the entire river Use limits Drift-only issues Guided /unguided use issues If you some issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use some segments), you can skip those sections.,. General Management Strategies There are several general management strategies used to address increasing use and visitor impacts in river corridors. Pease tell us whether you support or oppose each strategy. (Circle one number per strategy). Strategy Develop new facilities (such as launch day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume of use Expand or improve facilities to handle the volume of use Develop more a help redistribute use Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel /paved trails) to reduce impacts from use Boater safety education programs "Etiquette" education to address social impacts Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits to hru lanes "Leave no trace" education to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Limit use through permit reservation systems Zo ing r elations (o separate confiicttng users (boat vs .'.;bank anglers, motorized vs. non motorized} Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 Page 6of16 Development issues Fees Lower River specific actions Middle River specific actions Upper River specific actions 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 3 3 4 4 5 X 5 X 5 5 X X Specific Management Actions for the Entire River Several specific management actions have been suggested for the entire Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies, Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action) More restrooms in l igh use bank angler areas More fish cleaning stations in general Restrictions on number of fish atloved cleaned when others are waiting Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants More fishing platforms stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Increase patrols and litter pick -up at public easements Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 1 2 3 4 5 X Close more areas to bank fishin use is trampling vegetation More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling More fencing,/ signs to direct tisers hat can withstand the use Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re -open parts of them) Create `brochures and irrterret t dia showing to boat and lish.during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license" for powerboat operators (includes a written test) 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X Lena one day course about how to opera during high density :periods Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel" regulations (particularly in silver season) Require all boaters to wear PFDs (life jackets) Other (please specify): Otter (please specify 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X Page 7 of 16 Use Limits 1. Would you accept having to compete for a limited number of permits to use parts of the river if it meant there would be fewer other people on the river when you use it? (Circle one number) 1. Yes some limits on use are needed 2. Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available per day 3. Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse 4. No I'll always want unlimited access to the river 2. If a permit system were tried on one or more Kenai River segments, should it.,. (Circle one number) 1. Reduce use compared to current levels 2. Freeze use near current levels 3. Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) 4. Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 5. I oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase 3. Some rivers require boaters to register every time they go boating. "Mandatory registration" could be developed for some segments of the Kenai, with the following characteristics: boaters could register by phone or via the internet boaters would identify which segment they intended to use the number of boats that can register would not be limited a webpage would keep a "running tally" of registered boats for every segment and day Do you think a mandatory registration program should be developed for the Kenai? (Check all statements you agree with) No, because I'm opposed to mandatory programs like this. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which I oppose). D No, because this is unnecessary on the segments I use. No, this will cost too much to administer. No, this will be difficult to enforce. Maybe, but it depends on how easy it is to register. Maybe, but it depends on how much it costs per registration. ID Maybe, but it depends on which segment and season it applies to. Yes, because information about the number of other boaters would help me plan my trips. Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which I support). Other: 4. Parking length limits at day use areas on the Lower and Middle River range from 4 to 12 hours (and some only apply during the late red salmon run). Do you support time limits to increase "turnover" during high use periods? (Circle one number) 1. No, day use parking should not have limits. 2. Yes, day use parking should have some limits. 3. Yes, and different lots should have different limits (depends on the site and its popularity). 4. This issue doesn't matter to me. 5. If you think there should be some parking length limits, what is the most appropriate limit? hours per visit Page 8of16 "drift -only" Issues on the Lower and Middle River The following questions ask about "drift only issues on the Lower and Middle Rive r you (or you don't use these segments), skip to the next page. 1, Mondays in May, June, and July are "drift -only days" on the Lower and Middle R Lake). On these days, fishing from a motorized boat is not allowed (and guides Some people have suggested adding more "drift -only days" on these segments, allowed, Please tell us whether you support or oppose the following "drift- only" If these issues "don't matter" to iver (from River Mile 4 to Skilak are also not allowed), but with driftboat guiding actions. (Circle one per row) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know In general, more rift only' added to the Lower River. In general, more "drift only" days should be added to the Middle River. If "driftonty" days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available powerboats). 1 2 3 Page 9 of 16 4 5 X 2. If you support adding "drift only" days, what is the maximum number that should be added per week? (Select one) O None: I oppose adding "drift only" days. O 1 (in addition to Mondays) O 2 O 3 04 O 5 O 6 (Every day would be "drift only 3. If you support adding "drift only" days, in what months would you prefer them to be added? (Check any month(s) that apply) None; I oppose adding more "drift only" days June July August J September 4, If additional "drift only" days are added per week, which days would you prefer? (Check any clay(s) that apply) None: I oppose adding more "drift only" days Tuesday Wednesday Thursday D Friday Saturday LJ Sunday 5, If you have additional comments about "drift only" issues, please make them here: Guided Unguided Use Issues Some unguided users have concerns about the number or behavior of guides; some guides have concerns about the number or behavior of unguided users. To help us understand these issues, please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements, (Circle one number for each. if guided unguided use issues 'don't matter' to you, leave this page blank) 6 Qa guided boats canetract from The total hum. bei experiences. Some guides tend to be more aggressive' (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). o et e Aside from other issues, so that guided users catch more fish. Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat equipment to tisth in higher density areas. Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as 0 drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa). Some unguided users don't know t "rules fo driving on the river and create safety hazards, Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. No one group is the problem, everyone need share the burden of reducing impacts, The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to the group that is causing the impacts. ng guided use is a good way to reduce overall Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. Page 10 of 16 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know 1 2 3 4 X 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X If you have any additional comments about guide unguided use issues on the Kenai, please make them here: Development Issues 1. Public and private and owners on the Kenai River are currently allowed to develop up to one -third of their riverfront property with docks or fishing platforms. For the entire river, at least 12% of the river's banks have been developed. Based on this information and your experience, how much development is appropriate from a visual perspective? (Please check one response for each segment you visit). Development should be reduced Lower River 1 Middle River 'l Upper River 1 Keep it near current levels 2 Allow it to Allow it to increase increase slightly substantially 3 4 Allow it to Allow it double to triple 5 6 I'm uncomfortable answering this (please specify why below) 5 2 3 Page 11 of 16 4 5 6 2. If you are uncomfortable estimating an appropriate level of bankside development, check all reasons that apply. (lf you identified a development level above, leave this question blank). I just don't know I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount. i care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type and location of development. 1 don't care about visual impacts as long as there is no net loss" of fish habitat. I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation access facilities. 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about land use regulations and development along the Kenai River, (Circle one response per row) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know general, permitting requirements for docks, boardwalks, and erosion control structures are too restrictive. In general, existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the river from over 1 2 3 4 5 X development. 4. If you have any additional comments about development issues on the Kenai, please make them here: X C X Fees 1. Management of the Kenai River (facility maintenance, river patrols, etc.) is currently funded by state and federal revenues. Would you be willing to pay a "user fee' on the Kenai (beyond launch or other facility fees already charged), assuming that all revenues would be returned to help manage the river? 1. No 2, Yes 2. How much would you be willing to pay? dollars per day dollars per season Lower River Specific Actions Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Lower Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. if you dont know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know mile 6) 4 X New in Cunningham Pa New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) parking and docks at Pillars (mile 1 2.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) Improve restrooms and access across Cunningham Park (mile 6) New boat restrooms near Mud Is. Beaver Creek (mile 10) No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Stagger guided boat starting times in July to reduce launch congestion Limit the number of guided boats per day in July Limit the number of guides (in general Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) in July through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat registration numbers (even numbers on even dates, odd numbers on odd dates) 4' Page t2 of 16 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 X X X 2 3 4 5 X 2 Other (please specify): 3 4 5 X 1 2 3 4 5 X X Lower River Boat "Capacity" 1. in recent years, Lower River counts indicate the number of boats at one time during prime hours in July are,,. Typically 200 to 300 boats early in the month Typically 300 to 400 boats later in the month May exceed 450 boats a few days each year (usually Tuesdays and Saturdays later in the month) Were generally lower in 2009 due to low king returns; few counts exceeded 300 boats Counts include boats that are fishing and traveling on the river Counts refer to 16 miles of river from Warren Ames Bridge (mile 5) 10 Sterling Hwy Bridge (mlie 21) Because boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, people may encounter fewer boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised, Can you make a capacity estimate for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. (Circle one number per row; if you checked "no" responses, leave blank) On higher use days (such as 100 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000 1,500 Other: Tuesdays and Saturdays in late July) Lower River Guided Boat "Capacity" On other days 00 200 300. 400 500 6 0 800 1000 1,:500 Other: 1. The peak number of guide boats on the Lower River at one time during "guide hours" (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesday through Saturday) has varied over the years. In recent years in July, there are typically 100 to 150, with some peaks about 200. There are lower numbers in other months. Because guided boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, boaters may encounter fewer guided boats than these counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a "reasonable guide capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of guided boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a "guided boat capacity estimate" for the Lower River in July? (Check ail responses that apply) No, i object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats No, it depends on how guided boats are distributed No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit guided boats, which i oppose No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of guided boats, but I don't know how to estimate this O No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) Page 13 of 16 2, If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the maximum number of guided boats that should be on the Lower River at one time. (Circle one number per row. if you checked any of the 'trio" responses, leave this question blank), In July Middle River Specific Actions 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 50 100 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Middle Kenai River, Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. If you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) New launch on Funny River Road Morgan's (mite 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat restrooms near Killey River out New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet No wake zones in high density areas such a Swiftwater. .Dot's Landing, or '3rd Hole' ilea River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Require reservations for on -river campsites betw Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on -river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Restrict drift boats from traveling upstrea kickers (to minimize large wakes) Other: Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know cross f rom 2 3 4 X 1 2 Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit the number of glides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Other (please specify): Other (please specify): Page 14 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 X 4 X 2 3 4 5 X 2 2 3 3 4 5 X 4 5 X X! Upper River Specific Actions 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Upper Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. If you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) Require reseNations for on-river camping sites Organize the "spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Develop fire education /enforcement program in Russian River area Upper River Boat "Capacity" During red salmon runs At other times tamit the number of unguided boats between Sportsman's and Jim's Landing per day through a reservation system (guided boats are already limited) Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Other (please specify): Other (please specify): 1. Upper River boating counts have increased in recent years. For 2004, the latest year with accurate data, the number of boats passing the ferry per day in the fishing season... averaged about 60 boats per day on weekdays averages about 100 boats per day on weekends peaked over 200 boats per day on high use weekends (during red salmon runs) guided use is already limited on this segment, and typically ranges from 15 to 20 boats per day Because everyone travels downstream, there are multiple channels, and there are many daylight hours, people may encounter many fewer boats than these "per day" counts. However, there is interest in "starting a conversation" about a 'reasonable boat capacity estimate" for the Upper River the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Upper River (specifically from Sportsman's Landing to Jim's Landing)? (Check all responses that apply) O No, it depends on how the boats are distributed O No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this L No, it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" on the Sportsman's to Jim's Landing segment the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. (If you checked any of the "no' responses above, leave this question blank). 50 75 <50 75 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 4 X 100 150 Page 15of16 1 2 3 4 5 X X 1 2 3 4 5 X 200 2 3 4 5 X 250 300 400 Other 100 150 250 250 300 400 Other: Final Questions About You '1. How old are you? years 2. Are you? 1, Female 2. Male 3. Are you an Alaska resident? 1, No 2. Yes 4, If you live in the Kenai watershed (Cooper Landing, Sterling, Soldotna, Kenai), please estimate the number of days you hosted friends or family (from Alaska or out of state) in 2009. I hosted family friends from out of state about days in 2009 I hosted family friends from Alaska about days in 2009 5. If you were a visitor to the Kenai River in 2009, where did you stay in the area? (Check all that apply), Family and friends Hotels 1 motels D B &B Camped in a campground Camped in the backcountry D I'm not a visitor; I have a residence in the area. 6. If you were a visitor in 2009, how many days did you stay on the Kenai Peninsula and in Alaska? total days on the Kenai Peninsula total days in Alaska Thank you for completing the survey! Please mail it back to us in the self-addressed and stamped envelope provided. If you have additional comments about the Kenai River or how it should be managed, please make them below. If you have additional questions, please contact Doug Whittaker at KenaiRiverRecreationStudy @alaska,gov Page 16 of 16 ID From survey monkey, 9 digits STARTDAT Fm survey monkey. .,date of rspondnt starting the survey. SURVI` 2=emai II SURVMOD2 I =mail, 2=emalf ZTYPE1 lzus.er, 2=7guide, 3=iandowner ZTYPE2 1=bank, 2=drift, 3=power, 4=scenic, 5.= 6zundetermined 7TYPE3C; 2=drift, 3zpower, 4=scenic or other Kenai River Recreation Use Study 2009 User Follow-up Survey Codebook ZTYPE4 I =bank, 2 3 4=other 0,5, and 6 from ZTYPE2) ONSITEID From on-site surveys; 100s indicate lower rN/er, 200s indicate middle river; 300s indirate upper river, Page 1 of 22 Your experience on the Kenai River 1. People take different trips on the Kenai River. Using the map below to identify river segments, please indicate... ...all the types of trips you take in a typical year ...the two types of trips that are most important to you Ali trips you take (check all) Bead based dip netting at the mouth A tr Boat -based dip netting near the mouth ADIPBOAT Lower River bang fishing LC 'BANK ALOVVPB Lower River powerboat -based fishing Lower River fishing from a drnftboat 1 raft Lower River scenic floating (not fishing) Middle River bank fishing Middle River powerboat -based fishing Middle River fishing from a driftboat raft Middle River scenic floating (not fishing) Upper River bank fishing Upper River fishing from a driftboat 1 raft Upper River scenic floating (not fishing) Camping at a campground (anywhere) Other (please specify): Alm Page 2 of 22 ALOVVRAFT AM)D? AMIDPB AMIDRAFT At PCANV AUPDB ACAMP AOTH R 9 11 13 1St most 2''d most important trip important Your experience on the Kenai River (continued) 2. For your most important" type of trip, how often do you use a guide or other commercial services? Never Sometimes Frequently Fishing guide with boat AGFISH 1 2 3 Sightseeing 1 rafting guide (with boat) AGF'AFT 1 2 3 Boat rental with guide AGRENT 1 2 3 Vehicle shuttle ASHU T TLE 1 2 3 3. For your most important" type of trip, do you camp from a boat? (Circle one) BCAMPB 1. Never 2, Sometimes 3. Frequently 4. Do you own land on the river? 1. No �i skip to Question 11 on this page 2. Yes 5, Where is your land located? For landowners only 1. Lower River (downstream of Sterling Highway Bridge in Soldotna) 2. Middle River (Sterling Highway Bridge upstream to Skilak Lake) 3. Upper River (Skilak Lake to Kenai Lake) DOWN 6. Is there a house /building on your property? 1. No 2, Yes BHOUSE 7. Do you live in the house? 1. No 2. Part -time 3. Full -time BL!VE 8. Do you use a boat directly from your property? 1. No 2. Yes BBOAT 9, Do you fish from your property? 1, No 2. Yes BLIVE 10. Do you have any of the following waterfront development on your property? (Check all that apply) BDCCK D Dock BPLAT 0 Fishing boardwalk B T REED 0 Bank stabilization structure using mostly "natural" materials BRIPFAP 0 Bank stabilization structure using mostly "other" materials (riprap, bulwarks, gabions) 11. Do you use a boat on your Kenai River trips (you don't have to own the boat)? 1, No skip to "Issue Importance" section on next page 2. Yes 12. Please indicate (1) all the boats you use and (2) the boat you use most often. All boats you use (Check all that apply) Kayak Canoe Driftboat Powerboat Raft or multi person cataraft One, person cataraft `or "fishcat' Other (specify): OKAY bdA3�. CDRIFT BONN CBOAT Boat you use most often (Check one) 1 COFTEN 3 2 0 O O 5 O CRAFT Page 3 of 22 13. If you use a driftboat or raft, do you use a 'kicker" motor? (Check all that apply) ID No, I never use a motor on my driftboat or raft Yes, for traveling against the tide or wind on the Lower River Yes, for trolling short segments of the Middle River Yes, for traveling upstream to re -drift short segments on the Middle River Yes, for access to the Middle River (then returning to Lower Skilak launch) Yes, for crossing Skilak after a Kenai Canyon trip 14. If you use a powerboat, please indicate its length, hull shape, and type of motor the one you use most often) Length: feet Hull shape: 1. Vee or semi -vee 2. Flat bottom 3. Don't know Type of motor: 1. Two stroke (not legal in July) 2. Four- stroke o For boat users only CKICKER CKLOWER CKM[DSHT CKMiDUP CKMIDSKI CKCANYC)N (lf you own more than one boat, answer for 4. Other njected 2- stroke CLONG CHULL MOTOR OR Issue Importance The following have been mentioned as issues for managing recreation use on the Kenai River. Please indicate the importance of each issue to you. Unless a segment is specified, issues refer to the entire river in general. (Circle one number for each). Potential "issue Amount of river access for bank anglers Amount of facilities (launches, rest rooms, eto.) to handle Trampling of shoreline vegetation by anglers Litter and human waste Bear -human interactions Impacts of recreation use on wildlife along the Ti Boating safety Water clarity turbidi Powerboat effects on bank erosion Hydrocarbon pollution levels Not at all Slightly Important important DBANK t RACIL DTRAMP Number of bank anglers during red salmon runs Number of boats on Lower River in July Number of boats on Lower River in other months DRLOW Number of boats on i;Middle River during 2nd red "salmon run DEMID2 Number of boats on Middle River after 2nd red salmon run DBMID3 I umberof boats on Upper River during red salmon runs D )PRED Number of boats on Upper River after mid August Number of scenic "rafting taps on Upper River Discourteous behavior by users Conflict between motorized and non boaters Conflict between guides and unguided anglers Conflict between property owners and anglers Visual impacts of docks and boardwalks Visual impacts of private homes and buildings along river Other (please specify) DSAFE DTURBID DVVAKES D O3T DEAN FED DBUP3 DRAFTS DR.JDE DGUG DIVS1 Page 4 of 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Moderately Ver important impotl 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 D. OB.N 4 Other (please specify) DOTS ;E Extremely font:; of important know 5 6 5I 6 5 6 5.: 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5' 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 Responding to Crowding 1. The popularity of the Kenai means that some segments and seasons can be crowded. In general, do you feel crowded on your Kenai River trips? (Circle one number) 1. I never feel crowded skip to next section 2. I enjoy the crowds and social atmosphere skip to next section 3. I sometimes feel crowded (please answer the following questions about crowding) ECR D 2. If you feel crowded at some times, how do you generally cope with it? (Check all that apply) i go less frequently ELESS I resign myself to the new, more crowded experience ERES!GN 1 try to avoid other users (move to new fishing spots, etc.) in the same area EAVOID 1 plan to use the same segment at a different time of day EDAY I plan to use the same segment during the middle of the week EMIDWEEK I plan to use the same segment during the off season EOFF I plan to use other river segments that are less crowded ESEGS I plan to use other river segments at other times of the week ESEGWK I plan to use other river segments during another season ESEC SEA: I become dissatisfied EDSSAT I do other types of non -river recreation EH }NRIO I go to another river (please specify below) EORIV Changing Conditions and Past Use 1. Do you think the overall quality of trips and management on Kenai River has improved, declined, or stayed the same over the years? (Circle one number). Substantially Slightly Stayed the Slightly Substantially Don't improved improved same declined declined know Overall quality of trips FOJALT 2 3 4 5 6 Agency management FQUALM 2 3 4 5 6 2. Have you stopped visiting some segments in some months? (Circle one number), FS T OP 1. No, I use the same segments and seasons I always have SKIP TO PAGE 6 2. Yes, I have reduced my use of some segments in some months 3. Yes, I have stopped using some segments in some months Page 5 of 22 Changing Conditions and Past Use (continued) 3. For each segment where you've reduced or stopped your visits, check the reasons why. (Check all that apply for each segment) Possible reasons: Decline in fishing success Changes In fishing regulation Too many people Too many boats 2 Changes in motor regulations (no 2- strokes in July) FLOW 2UP F3UP UP F5UP Too many powerboats (guided or unguided) Too many guide boats Too many ungu rd ed boats Boating became unsafe Too much discourteous behavior Hard to find parking camping Prefer fishing in other locations didn't want to contribute to crowding My fishing partners consider it too crowded I fish with different people who go to other segments Now l fish from a beat I no longer use a boat O tt er (specify); Other (specify): July Au gust September Month Page 6 of 22 Lower River Middle River Upper River Fl LOW F5LOW F61 OW F7 LOW F3LO r9LOW F11LOW 4L;tr� F15L0VV l L ?W F17LOW Lower River FJU FSEPLQW FWD F5MI F7MID F1 UP F7UP F9UP F11MID F11 UP F13MID Fl F17MID 4. For each segment, please indicate the month(s) when you have reduced or stopped your visits. (Check all that apply) Middle River F JULMID F FSFPMID F13UP e....S�:V k.✓ F17UP Upper River F ILINUP FJULUP FL) U FSPPUP The remainder of the survey asks about management actions that might be used to address recreation impact problems. The questions are organized by sections as fisted below, General management strategies Specific management actions for the entire river Use limits Drift -only issues Guided /unguided use issues if you some issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use some segments), you can skip those sections,., General Management Strategies There are several general management strategies used to address increasing use and visitor impacts in river corridors, Please tell us whether you support or oppose each strategy. (Circle one number per strategy). Strategy Develop new facilities (such as launches, day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume use Expand or improve facilities to handle the volume of use Develop more access to less river to help redistribute use Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel /paved trails) to reduce impacts from use Boater safety education programs "Etiquette" education to address social impacts Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits in "thru lanes') "Leave no trace" education to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Limit use through permit reservation systems Zoning regulations to separate conflicting users (boat vs, bank anglers, motorized vs non motorized) Strongly oppose Development issues Fees Lower River specific actions Middle River specific actions Upper River specific actions Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose support support know GIMPROVE 2 3 4 GHARDEN 2 3 4 G ETT AK GENT GPERMI T Page 7 of 22 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 Specific Management Actions for the Entire River Several specific management actions have been suggested for the entire Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action) Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 2 4 More restroorns in high use bank angler areas More fish cleaning stations in general Restrictions "on.numberr of fish allowed to be cleaned when others are :waiting Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants More fishing platforms,/ stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Increase patrols and litter pick -up at easements Close more areas to bank fishing where .existing use is trampling vegetation More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling More fencing 1 signs to direct that can withstand the use Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re -open parts of them) Create brochures and Internet media showing how to boat and tlsh during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license" for powerboat operators (includes a written test) Offer a one day course about how to oper boats during "high density periods Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel" regulations (particularly in silver HNPCHOR 2 season) Require all boaters to wear PFDs {life. j Other (please specify): HCLEAN H3EAR HPATROL CS HVEG HREOPEN HLICENSE Page 8 of 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Other (please specify); 4 5 X 4 5 X 4 5 4 5 X 4 5 4 5 X 4 5 4 5 X 4 5 X X X Use Limits 1. Would you accept having to compete for a limited number of permits to use parts of the river if it meant there would be fewer other people on the river when you use it? (Circle one number) 1. Yes some limits on use are needed 2. Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available per day 3. Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse 4. No I'll always want unlimited access to the river 2. If a permit system were tried on one or more Kenai River segments, should it... 1. Reduce use compared to current levels 2. Freeze use near current levels 3. Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) 4. Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 5, l oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase 1. No, day use parking should not have limits. 2. Yes, day use parking should have some limits. 3, Yes, and different lots should have different limits (depends on the site and its popularity). 4. This issue doesn't matter to me. 5, If you think there should be some parking length limits, what is the most appropriate limit? Page 9 of 22 JLIM7 JREDUCE. 3. Some rivers require boaters to register every time they go boating. "Mandatory registration" could be developed for some segments of the Kenai, with the following characteristics: boaters could register by phone or via the internet boaters would identify which segment they intended to use the number of boats that can register would not be limited a webpage would keep a `running tally" of registered boats for every segment and day Do you think a mandatory registration program should be developed for the Kenai? (Check all statements you agree with) No, because I'm opposed to mandatory programs like this. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which D No, because this is unnecessary on the segments I use. No, this will cost too much to administer. No, this will be difficult to enforce. Maybe, but it depends on how easy it is to register. Maybe, but it depends on which segment and season it applies to. Yes, because information about the number of other boaters would help me plan my trips. JYHELP D Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which 1 support). JYLEAD 3" Other: JOPPOSE I oppose). LEAD JNONEED JCOST JENFORC;E 3MREG r E E F S J�Vi J 4. Parking length limits at day use areas on the Lower and Middle River range from 4 to 12 hours (and some only apply during the late red salmon run). Do you support time limits to increase "turnover" during high use periods? (Circle one number) PARK hours per visit JHOLIRS "Drift- only" Issues on the Lower and Middle River KANS 1 =did not answer these questions; 2= answered drift only questions The following questions ask about "drift only issues on the Lower and Middle River. if these issues "don't matter" to you (or you don't use these segments), skip to the next page. 1. Mondays in May, June, and July are "drift -only days" on the Lower and Middle River (from River Mile 4 to Skilak Lake). On these days, fishing from a motorized boat is not allowed (and guides are also not allowed). Some people have suggested adding more "drift -only days" on these segments, but with driftboat guiding allowed. Please tell us whether you support or oppose the following "drift- only" actions. (Circle one per row) In general snore "drift only" days s be added to the Lower River In general, more "drift only" days should be added to the Middle River. If "drift only" days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available for powerboats). Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know KMID 2 3 4 5 6 2. If you support adding "drift only" days, what is the maximum number that should be added per week? (Select one) 1 0 None: I oppose adding "drift only" days. 2 0 (in addition to Mondays) 3 02 4 03 5 04 E 05 7 0 6 (Every day would be "drift only 3. If you support adding "drift only" days, in what months would you prefer them to be added? (Check any month(s) that apply) None; 1 oppose adding more "drift only" days KNONE11 June KJUN July K>UL August KAUG September KS EP 4. If additional "drift only" days are added per week, which days would you prefer? (Check any day(s) that apply) None: I oppose adding more "drift only" days KNONE2 Tuesday KTUE Wednesday KWEC) Thursday KTHUR Friday KFRi D Saturday KSAT Sunday KSUN KIvtAX 5, If you have additional comments about "drift only" issues, please make them here: PagelOof22 Guided 1 Unguided Use issues Some unguided users have concerns about the number or behavior of guides; some guides have concerns about the number or behavior of unguided users. To help us understand these issues, please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Circle one number for each. If guided /unguided use issues "don't matter" to you, leave this page blank) 0 The total number of guided boats can detract from experiences. Some guides tend to be "more aggressive" (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift), Aside from other issues, sofas peopie are envious that guided users catch more fish., Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat/equipment to fish l rr' density areas. .1; Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques g (such as drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa). a Some unguided users don't know the "rules for driving on the river and create safety hazards. Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. No one group is the problem eve share the burden of reducing impac`_ The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to the group that is causing the impacts. Limiting guided overall use. Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. Page 11 of 22 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree disagree agree agree know MG2 2 3 4 5 6 MG4 2 3 4 5 6 MP2 MP4 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 MA4 2 3 4 5 6 If you have any additional comments about guide unguided use issues on the Kenai, please make them here: Development Issues 1. Public and private and owners on the Kenai River are currently allowed to develop up to one -third of their riverfront property with docks or fishing platforms. For the entire river, at least 12% of the river's banks have been developed. Based on this information and your experience, how much development is appropriate from a visual perspective? (Please check one response for each segment you visit). Development should be reduced Lower River NLOW Middle River Upper River NUP Keep it near current levels 2 2 Allow it to Allow it to increase increase slightly substantially 3 3 2. If you are uncomfortable estimating an appropriate level of bankside development, check all reasons that apply. Of you identified a development level above, leave this question blank). I just don't know NDK I care about visual impacts but it is difficult to specify an appropriate amount. ND]FF I care about visual impacts but the appropriate amount depends on the type and location of development. NDEPS I don't care about visual impacts as long as there is 'no net loss" of fish habitat. NNETLOSS I don't care about visual impacts because property owners have a right to create recreation access facilities. NRIGHT 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about land use regulations and development along the Kenai River. (Circle one response per row) In general, permitting requirements for docks, booardwalk, and erosion control structures are too restrictive. Strongly disagree Page 12 of 22 4 4 Allow it to Allow it double to triple 5 5 6 6 I'm uncomfortable answering this (please specify why below) 7 7 Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't disagree agree agree know In general, existing zoning and permitting requirements protect the NEXIST 2 3 4 5 6 river from over development. 4. It you have any additional comments about development issues an the Kenai, please make them here: Fees 1, Management of the Kenai River (facility maintenance, river patrols, etc.) is currently funded by state and federal revenues. Would you be willing to pay a "user fee" on the Kenai (beyond launch or other facility fees already charged), assuming that all revenues would be returned to help manage the river? 1. No 2. Yes 2. How much would you be willing to pay? dollars per day dollars per season Lower River Specific Actions New launch in Cunningham Park (mile 6) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and docks at Pillars (mile 12.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) Improve restrooms and access across Cunningham Park (mile 8) New boat restrooms near Mud Is. Beaver Creek (mile 10) No wake zones in high density areas such Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open "driving lane' (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Stagger guided start times in July to reduce launch Limit the number of guided boats per day in July Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) in July through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat registration numbers (even numbers on even odd numbers on odd dates) Other (please sp Page 13 0 €22 OFEE C DAY OSEAS Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Lower Kenai River by users, stakeholders, and agencies. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. If you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) PANS 2= answerd Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 4 6 P2 2 3 4 5 P 2 3 4 5 P4 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 P, 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 P8 2 3 4 5 6 PC3 6 P10 2 3 4 5 P11I 2 3 5 P12 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 Lower River Boat "Capacity" 1. In recent years, Lower River counts indicate the number of boats at one time during prime hours in July are... Typically 200 to 300 boats early in the month Typically 300 to 400 boats later in the month May exceed 450 boats a few days each year (usually Tuesdays and Saturdays later in the month) Were generally lower in 2009 due to low king returns; few counts exceeded 300 boats Counts include boats that are fishing and traveling on the river Counts refer to 16 miles of river from Warren Ames Bridge (mile 5) to Sterling Hwy Bridge (mile 21) Because boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, people may encounter fewer boats than these counts. However, there is interest in 'starting a conversation" about a "reasonable capacity estimate" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed PCAF No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose PCAP2 No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me PCAF3 No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish PCB F4 No, 1 care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this PCAP5 No, it's too complicated PCAPS Yes (please provide your estimates below) PCAP 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" for the Lower River the number of boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. (Circle one number per row; if you checked "no" responses, leave blank) On higher use days (such as Tues and Sat PCAPHI 100 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000 1,500 Oth in late July) On other days 200 300 400 500 600 800 2 3 5 6 I Page 14 of 22 0€l 8 500 Oth 9 Lower River Guided Boat "Capacity" 1. The peak number of guide boats on the Lower River at one time during "guide hours' (6 am to 6 pm, Tuesday through Saturday) has varied over the years. In recent years in July, there are typically 100 to 150, with some peaks about 200. There are lower numbers in other months. Because guided boats are not evenly distributed and some users only fish a part of the river, boaters may encounter fewer guided boats than these counts. However, there is interest in 'starting a conversation" about a "reasonable guide capacity estimate for the Lower River —the number of guided boats at one time before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a "guided boat capacity estimate" for the Lower River in July? (Check all responses that apply) No, I object to defining a "capacity" for guided boats PG1 No, it depends on how guided boats are distributed PG2 No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit guided boats, which 1 oppose PG3 No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me PG4 No, the number of guided boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish PG5 No, I care about the number of guided boats, but I don't know how to estimate this PG6 No, it's too complicated PG7 UI Yes (please provide your estimates below) PG8 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the maximum number of guided boats that should be on the Lower River at one time. (Circle one number per row. if you checked any of the "no" responses, leave this question blank). in July In other months PJUL 50 100 150 3 200 250 300 400 500 600 Other ,r 50 100 150 250 300 400 200 4 Page 15 of 22 5 6 7 500 8 9 Other Middle River Specific Actions Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Miele Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. If you dons know about an area or action, just leave it blank.) Strongly oppose New launch on Funny:, Rive Morgan's (mile 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat restrooms near Miley River outlet New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet No wake zones in high density areas such as Swiftwater, Dots Landing, or "3rd Hole" near Killey River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" Require reservations for on -river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on -river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Restrict drift boats from traveling upstream using kickers (to minimize large wakes) Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit the number of guides (in general) 02 010 012 Page 16 <1 22 Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose support support know 2 2 2 3 3 Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Other (please specify), 3 Other (please specify): QANS 2 =answered 4 4 5 5 6 (for boats on step) through some of these same 06 2 3 4 5 6 areas 08 2 3 4 5 6 6 4 5 6 6 Upper River Specific Actions 1. Several specific management actions have been suggested for the Upper Kenai River. Please tell us whether you support or oppose each action. (Check one response per action. if you don't know about an area or action, just leave it blank) 2 Require reservations for On cantping sites Organize the "spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Develop fire education 1 enforcement program in Russian River area Limit the number of unguided boats between Sportsman's and Jill's landing per day through a resenrafion system (guided boats are already limited) Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Other (please specify): Other (please specify): Upper River Boat "Capacity" 1. Upper River boating counts have increased in recent years. For 2004, the latest year with accurate data, the number of boats passing the ferry per day in the fishing season... averaged about 60 boats per day on weekdays averages about 100 boats per day on weekends peaked over 200 boats per day on high use weekends (during red salmon runs) guided use is already limited on this segment, and typically ranges from 15 to 20 boats per day Because everyone travels downstream, there are multiple channels, and there are many daylight hours, people may encounter many fewer boats than these per day" counts. However, there is interest in 'starting a conversation" about a "reasonable boat capacity estimate" for the Upper River the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised. Can you make a capacity estimate for the Upper River (specifically from Sportsman's Landing to Jim's Landing)? (Check all responses that apply) D No, it depends on how the boats are distributed RCAP1 No, I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose RCAP2 No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me RCAR3 D No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish RCAP4 D No, l care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this RCAP5 D No, it's too complicated RCAF6 C] Yes (please provide your estimates below) RCAP7 2. If you checked "yes" above, please estimate the "reasonable capacity" on the Sportsman's to Jim's Landing segment the number of boats per day before the quality of trips is compromised, (If you checked any of the 'no" responses above, leave this question blank). During red runs At other times RRED 50 75 100 150 200 250 300 400 Other: 150 50 75 2 3 Page 17 of 22 Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know R2 2 3 4 5 6 R4 2 3 4 5 6 R6 2 3 4 5 6 4 200 250 30 0 400 Other: 5 6 7 7 Final Questions About You 1. How old are you? years SAGE 2. Are you? 1. Female 2. Male SSEX 3. Are you an Alaska resident? 1. No 4. If you live in the Kenai watershed (Cooper Landing, Sterling, Soldotna, Kenai), please estimate the number of days you hosted friends or family (from Alaska or out of state) in 2009. I hosted family friends from out of state about days in 2009 SHCS T OUT 1 hosted family friends from Alaska about days in 2009 SHOSTAK 5. if you were a visitor to the Kenai River in 2009, where did you stay in the area? (Check all that apply). Family and friends SEAM Hotels motels SMOTEL. B &B SEA Camped in a campground SOV' Camped in the backcountry SBASIK I'm not a visitor; I have a residence in the area. SHOME 2. Yes SAK 6. If you were a visitor in 2009, how many days did you stay on the Kenai Peninsula and in Alaska? total days on the Kenai Peninsula total days in Alaska Page 18 of 22 SVISKEN SVISAK Thank you for completing the survey! Please mail it back to us in the self addressed and stamped envelope provided. If you have additional comments about the Kenai River or how it should be managed, please make them below. If you have additional questions, please contact Doug Whittaker at KenaiRiverRecreationStudy ()a,alaska.c1ov Additional Guide Questions Your experience on the Kenai River (continued) 2. How many years have you been fishing or boating on the Kenai? 3. How many years have you been a registered guide (fishing or scenic trips) on the Kenai? 4. in an "average" year (don't include 2009), how many (1) days per year and (2) clients per year do you guide on the Kenai River? (Ifs okay to provide rough estimates) days per year clients per year 5. For 2009, do you expect to guide fewer, about the same, Days in 2009 Clients in 2009 Many fewer Fewer (Over 30% less) (5 to 30% less Private dock near Beaver Creek Eagle Rock Pillars Stewart's Cho's Poacher's Cove Other private dock on Lower River Centennial Swiftwater Other (please specify): Centennial Swiftwater izaak Walton Bings Landing Lower Skilak Other private dock on Middle River Other (please specify): Page 19 of 22 or more than you indicated above? About the same More 6. If you guide from a powerboat on the Lower River, please check the launch you use most often. 7. If you guide from a powerboat on the Middle River, please check the launch you use most often. years years Many more (plus/minus 5 (5 to 30% more) (Over 30% more King Salmon Fishing Use and Trends on the Lower and Middle Rivers The following questions ask about guided king salmon fishing from a powerboat on the Lower and Middle River. if you do not guide for king salmon from a powerboat, skip to the next section. 1. Please rate the importance of the following factors in determining when, where, and how long you take your clients fishing: My personal knowledge of a specific location Fishing reports from recent days Fishing reports from others while you are on the river (via phones, radio, conversations) Personal success at a location from recent days Sonar counts Information from /about Fish Game netting boat Tidal information Water level information Water clarity Seeing boats at a location Seeing few other boats at a location Seeing other boats having success (nets up) It is close to the launch I use Client preferences for a specific location Other In general... being among The first boats at a location wh en guide hours open (at 6 am) is important for fishing success ...aside from tidal considerations, king salmon fishing is generally better in the morning and diminishes through the day. Back trolling Back bouncing Drifting (or dragging) Fishing from an anchor 100 1 1 1 1 1 2. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following statements. xtremety nt �mportn# �€portart I mportant important Slightly tilod Brat 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 Strongly Slightly Neither Slightly Strongly disagree disagree agree agree 1 1 Page 20 of 22 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Don't know 6 3. When you are guiding clients for king salmon, about what percent of time do you use the following techniques (Your response must sum to 100 for example 25% 25% 25% 25% 100 3. Please tell us whether you agree or disagree with the following general statements about king salmon fishing trends over the last five years. In general... m ore boats are fishing farther (below the ADF &G king sonar). .,.more boats are "fishing the tides." more boats are back, bouncing than back trolling: .,.fewer boats are recognizing traditional 'drifting' or "dragging" (not back trolling) areas. rnor power boats fish from an anctio ...there are more unguided boats during guide hours (6 -6 Tue thru Sat) theme #00r' rental boats d hours. ...there are more non motorized boats during guide hours, Drift only section.... Strongly Slightly Neither Slightly Strongly disagree disagree agree agree Page 21 of 22 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 O Probably yes O Definitely yes 6. If you answered "definitely no" or "probably no," check any reasons that apply: I prefer guiding from a powerboat My clients prefer powerboat -based fishing Physical demands of rowing Drift-based fishing can't match powerboat -based success rates Less flexibility to reach "hot" fishing locations Requires learning new ways and places to fish Logistical challenges (arranging shuttles will be too complicated or costly) Existing launches do not offer enough good trip length options I don't have a driftboat raft to use for guiding Other (please specify) 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 Don't know 6 6 6 6 there are more inexperienced boaters during guide hours. 5. If additional "drift only" days are added per week, would you offer guided driftboat fishing or sightseeing trips on those days (assume guides would be allowed to operate)? O Definitely no O Probably no Additional Landowner Survey Questions 9. Do anglers or other river users trespass on your property? No .3 Skip to next section Yes 10. Check all the types of trespassing that occurs on your property... Bank anglers fishing on my property (above ordinary high water) Bank anglers crossing my property on their way to /from a fishing location Anglers parking vehicles on my property Anglers parking vehicles that block road access to my property Unguided boaters launching or taking -out their boats on my property U Guides launching or taking -out their boats on my property D Guides dropping off anglers to fish Guides dropping off clients to go to the bathroom U Other (please explain) Page 22 Gf 22 Introduction This section of the supplemental report provides additional results from the on -site survey (not presented in the main report). Tables are provided with minimal explanation; readers are encouraged to review results in combination with specific survey items to identify possible responses. 1. Percent of lower river powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. 2 2. Percent of guided and unguided powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. 2 3. Bank angler user characteristics: target species, fishing success, years experience 2 4. Drift angler user characteristics: target species, fishing success, years experience. 3 5. Other upper river drift angler user characteristics 3 8. Use level evaluations 5 10, Additional perceived crowding results 7 11. Correlations between overall perceived crowding and crowding at specific locations for drift anglers. 8 12. Correlations between overall perceived crowding and crowding at specific locations for powerboat anglers. 8 13. Additional information about respondents reporting 3 or more discourteous behaviors. 8 14. Bank angler tolerances: angler proximity 9 15. Bank angler tolerances: fishing competition. 9 16. Bank angler tolerances: entanglements 9 17. Bank angler tolerances: boat interference. 9 18. Drift angler tolerances: boat interference 10 19. Drift angler tolerances: fishing competition. 10 20. Drift angler tolerances: put -in and take -out time. 10 21. Powerboat angler tolerances: boat interference. 11 22. Powerboat angler tolerances: fishing competition. 11 23. Powerboat angler tolerances: put -in and take -out time. 11 24. Powerboat angler reported put -in and take -out times (average in minutes) at different locations 11 25. General satisfaction ratings 12 26. What predicts satisfaction? 13 27. Correlations between impacts and use levels for bank anglers 14 28. Relationships between boat counts and reported impacts for lower river powerboat anglers. 15 Unsure Of those who reported... Mouth to Sonar Sonar to Pillars Pillars to Poachers Poachers to Soldotna Bridge Unsure Mouth to sonar Sonar to Pillars Pillars to Poachers Poachers to Bridge Middle River 11 1. Percent of Lower River powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. All powerboat anglers 13 31 24 8 All powerboat anglers primarily targeting kings 9 50 46 16 Put 7 Guided powerboat anglers primarily targeting kings 19 36 7 55 55 11 2. Percent of guided and unguided powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. Primary fish silvers Primary fish kings Unguided Guided Unguided Guided 3. Bank angler user characteristics: target species, fishing success, years experience. Powerboat anglers targeting species other than kings 14 32 47 30 11 Primary reds Unguided Guided 4 10 13 33 2 33 24 5 7 4 41 17 45 16 40 32 11 16 31 8 35 33 11 0 9 2 14 7 3 0 14 72 5 8 32 33 Lower River Middle River Upper River Early red run Upper River Late red run Outside reds kings primary (percent any) 14 (15) 3 (9) reds 50 (59) 84 (98) 90 (92) silvers 30 (38) 8 (12) 7 (11) pinks 0 (6) 0 <1) 0 (2) Not analyzed trout/dolly 1 (6) 3 (5) 2 (6) no target 3 2 1 hooked fish 48 67 80 Mean hooked 1.9 3.3 6.8 10.5 4.9 6.3 Mean let go 0.6 1.1 3.7 5.1 2.6 4.0 Mean kept 0.8 1.1 2.9 2,3 1.0 1.0 others in party caught fish 42 57 55 Years fishing Kenai median (mean) 5.0 (9,4) 5.0 (9.1) 5.0 (10.1) 10.5 10.9 8.5 first year 33 29 29 Days per year median (mean) 10 (19.0) 8.5 (16.2) 5.0 (11,5) 12.0 10.8 11.9 Hours on this day median (mean) 5.0 (6.1) 5.0 (6,0) 6.0 (6.1) 6.0 6.2 6.2 Unsure Of those who reported... Mouth to Sonar Sonar to Pillars Pillars to Poachers Poachers to Soldotna Bridge Unsure Mouth to sonar Sonar to Pillars Pillars to Poachers Poachers to Bridge Middle River 11 1. Percent of Lower River powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. All powerboat anglers 13 31 24 8 All powerboat anglers primarily targeting kings 9 50 46 16 Put 7 Guided powerboat anglers primarily targeting kings 19 36 7 55 55 11 2. Percent of guided and unguided powerboat anglers reporting use by different segments. Primary fish silvers Primary fish kings Unguided Guided Unguided Guided 3. Bank angler user characteristics: target species, fishing success, years experience. Powerboat anglers targeting species other than kings 14 32 47 30 11 Primary reds Unguided Guided 4 10 13 33 2 33 24 5 7 4 41 17 45 16 40 32 11 16 31 8 35 33 11 0 9 2 14 7 3 0 14 72 5 8 32 33 4. Drift angler user characteristics: target species, fishing success, years experience. kings are primary target 7 (9) 88 (88) 4 (9) (percent reporting for species at ail) reds 22 (32) 2 (8) 8 (13) 26 (36) silvers 4 (11) 10 (10) 12 (16) 2 (11) %pinks 0(1) 0 0(1) 0(1) trout/dolly 64 (77) 0 (8) 73 (84) 69 (82) no target 3 0 4 3 guided 32 2 54 32 camp 3 (n =21 all upper) 0 0 4 (n =21) hooked fish 88 55 89 91 Median mean hooked 6 (9.5) 1 (1.1) 6.0 (10.0) 7.0 (10.1) Median mean let go 5 (7.7) 0 (0.2) 2.5 (6.1) 5.0 (8.7) Median mean kept 0 (0.6) 0 (0.5) 0 (0.7) 0 (0.6) others in party caught fish 75 35 85 78 Years fishing Kenai median (mean) 5 (9.7) 18 (16.9) 4 (9.9) 5 (9.0) first year 29 15 43 27 Days per year median (mean) 5 (14.0) 12 (22.2) 4 (14.4) 5 (13.2) Hours on this day median (mean) 7 (6.4) 7 (6.8) 8.0 (7.8) 6 (6.3) 5, Other Upper River drift angler user characteristics. reds 23 31 silvers 2 2 troutldolly 71 64 °/a no target 3 3 who camp 5 0 caught nothing '12 1 hooked fish 88 55 Mean (median) fish hooked 8.7 (5) 13.4 (10) reporting that others in party caught fish 71 94 Years fishing Kenai (mean) 11.2 4.3 first year fishing Kenai 16 56 Days per year (mean) 17.2 4.7 rl.,. obe All drift anglers Lower River Middle River Upper River Unguided Guided 6. Powerboat angler user characteristics. reds silvers pinks trout/dolly no target 7. Group size statistics. Other group size results: 28% of bank anglers fish alone. 66% of bank anglers fish in 2 or less. 97% in groups of 6 or less. Typical range (Interquatile): 1 to 3. 5% of drift anglers fish alone. IQ range its 3 to 5. 98% in groups of 6 or less. Confi n 466 183 34 109 133 kings as primary target 37 (38) 87 (87) 21 (24) 0 0 (percent fishing for the species at all) 8 (14) 11 (18) 32 (32) 4 (6) 4 (9) 35 (38) 0 (1) 0 92 (94) 48 (55) 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 0 0 (2) 18 (26) 2 (3) 47 (56) 4 (6) 45 (68) 1 0 0 1 3 guided 34 n =156 23 n =44 33% n =11 19% n =21 62% n =81 camp <1 0 3 0 <1 %hooked fish 64 37 84 72 91 Median mean hooked 1.0 (4.3) 0 (0.9) 3.5 (5.3) 2 (3.0) 6 (10.4) Median mean let go 0 (2.5) 0 (0.3) 3 (4.5) 0 (0.3) 0 (5.9) Median 1 mean kept 0 (1.6) 0 (0.8) 0 (1.1) 2 (1.5) 0 (1.1) others in party caught fish 57 27 71 66 88 Years fishing Kenai median (mean) 8 (12.6) 10 (12.9) 9 (12.0) 10 (15.5) 3 (10.0) first year 24 17 21 20 38 Days per year median (mean) 10 (18.5) 10 (19.3) 11 (18.2) 15 (23.8) 5 (13.5) Hours on this day median (mean) 6.5 (6.6) 6 (6.1) 7 (7.3) 6 (5.8) 8 (7.9) All anglers Lower River Middle River Upper River Group size average Bank anglers 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.7 Drift anglers 3.5 2.9 12 3.5 Powerboat anglers 3.0 3.1 2.9 0% of powerboat anglers are in groups of 6 or more. 7% fish alone. 37% fish in pairs on lower; 47% fish in pairs on middle. All powerboat anglers Lower River Middle River Lower River Middle River king season king season after kings after kings 8. Use level evaluations Anglers were asked, ''For the kind of recreation experience you want on the Kenai, how would you describe the use level today with response ranging on a 5 point scale from "too tow" to "too high" and a mid -point at "about right." All groups had majorities reporting use was "about right" in 2009, but averages were higher than the mid point (indicating more respondents thought use was too high than too low), with the proportion "high" or "too high" ranging from 14% (Lower River powerboaters) to 38% (Upper River drift anglers). Percent of different groups reporting use levels were high" or "too high" for different segments are given below, along with mean responses. The variable was highly correlated with perceived crowding, which offers comparisons with other rivers and became the focus in the main report. The two scores that were statistically higher are highlighted in bold (pc 05). Use level evaluations.,. Percent high or too high Upper River bank anglers 27 3.2 Middle River bank anglers 21 3.1 Lower River bank anglers 26 3.7 Upper River drift anglers 38 3.4 Middle River drift anglers 23 3.2 Lower River drift anglers 23 3.1 Lower River powerboat anglers 14 3.0 Middle River powerboat anglers 24 3.2 Mean score 9. Profile comparisons for Lower River powerboaters on low vs. high use days. Low use days defined as less than 150 counted boats (during highest count for the day). High use days are 150+ boats. Higher use days Lowest use days fish for kings 74 95 for reds 24 2 for trout 1 1 hooked fish 51 32 Average trip time in hours 6.2 5.8 unsure where they went 11 22 fish near mouth for reds 22 8 fish Warren Ames to Sonar segment 39 38 fish Sonar to Pillars 22 35 fish Pillars to Poachers 19 10 Average overall satisfaction score (not significant at p <.05) 4.1 3.9 reporting some degree of perceived crowding (3 -9 on the 9 pt. scale). Average perceived crowding score 79 48 4.5 2.6 Additional 10, Additional perceived crowding results The following table includes mean and median perceived crowding scores (tied to findings presented in Table 6 -2 in the main report). Additional information about sample sizes or other comments are also provided. Group /situation Upper early run bank Upper weekends in Sep drift Middle drift Middle guided drift Middle after kings power Lower other times power Middle other times power Lower after kings powerboat Percent reporting some degree of crowding (3 -9 on 9 point scale) Over capacity: Studies and management likely needed to preserve quality Lower high use king days power 79 4.5 4.0 N= 54 Upper weekends drift 70 4.1 4.0 N =250; 6% extremely Upper unguided drift 69 4.0 4.0 N =382 Upper weekends bank 66 3.8 4.0 7% extremely High Normal: Monitor if use increases expected to anticipate problems Middle second run peak bank 64 3.7 3.0 N =215; 7% extremely Lower second run peak bank 64 3.5 3.0 N =70; 3 extremely Upper drift 63 3.7 3.0 N =560; 4 extremely Upper bank 62 3.7 4,0 N =363; 7% extremely Upper weekdays in Sep drift 62 3.6 3.0 N =63; 6% extremely Upper weekdays bank 57 3.7 3.0 7% extremely Upper late run bank 56 3.2 3.0 2% extremely Lower primary target kings power 54 3.1 3.0 N =147 Lower drift 53 3.2 3.0 N =51; 6% Upper weekdays drift 50 3.1 2.5 N =220; 4% Low Normal: Unlikely to be a problem; may offer rare low density experiences Lower on low use king days power 48 2,6 2 N =100 Middle bank 47 2.9 2.0 n =310; 5% extremely Upper drift guided 47 3.1 2.0 N =177 Upper bank 45 2.9 2.0 3% extremely Lower bank 41 2.7 1.0 N =160; 2% extremely Middle drift unguided 39 2.4 2.0 N =40 No Crowding: no problem; likely to offer rare low- density experiences Mean Median Comments 88 5.4 6.0 18% extremely 88 4.7 5.0 N =130; 10% extremely 34 2.2 1.0 N =80; 0% 30 2.1 1.0 N =33 30 2.1 1.0 N =126 22 2.0 1.0 N =90; 2 extremely. 17 1.7 1.0 N =128; 2% extremely 7 1.4 1.0 N =105 Pap 11. Correlations between overall perceived crowding and crowding at specific locations for drift anglers. Overall crowding Lower River Middle River Upper River correlation with... Crowding at put -in .82 .65 .73 Crowding at take -out .84 .71 ,69 Crowding while fishing .91 .85 .90 12. Correlations between overall perceived crowding and crowding at specific locations for powerboat anglers. Kings as primary (any segment) n =154 Lower not Middle not kings kings n =125 n =152 Powerboat anglers Crowding at put -in .70 .74 .69 Crowding at take -out .78 ,85 .82 Crowding while fishing .88 ,84 .85 Crowding while traveling .91 .96 .87 13. Additional information about respondents reporting 3 or more discourteous behaviors. For Upper River bank anglers: Of the 45 people (12 who reported 3 or more discourteous behaviors... 85 percent reported some degree of crowding (58% for those who report 2 or less) 15% extremely crowded (only 6% for others) Median proximity reported: one rod length (one car length for others) Median competition fishing reported: 2.9 (2.3 for others) Mean entanglements reported: 4.8 (2.3 for others) Mean courteous behaviors reported: 6.0 (4.9 for others) Mean satisfaction 4.0; 20% reported dissatisfaction (4.2 for others, 9% reported dissatisfaction). For Upper River drift anglers Only 28 of 560 (5 report 3 or more discourteous behaviors, 82% percent crowded. 11% felt extremely crowded. Median courteous behaviors 3.0 (mean of 12,1 influenced by high outliers). Mean put in time: 5.9 mins. Mean take -out time: 9.1 mins. Mean satisfaction 4.5 (4% reported dissatisfied). For powerboaters reporting 3 or more discourteous behaviors... Only 10 total (2 Primary fish: 40% kings, 20% silvers, 10 trout. 30% were guided. 30% unsure where they went, 14. Bank angler tolerances: angler proximity. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response (''doesn't matter" responses not included). Shoulder -to- shoulder <3 ft. apart) 11 11 15 8 One rod length (6 -10 feet) 53 54 48 17 One car length (15 -20 feet) 26 26 22 28 Two car lengths (30 -40 feet) 5 5 8 28 Casting distance (about 60 feet) 3 3 6 14 Out of sight 1 1 1 6 15. Bank angler tolerances: fishing competition. Percent of respondents reporting each response.. ..among those offering a response «doesn't matter" responses not included). Rarely or never 23 20 41 14 About 25% of the time 33 32 35 46 About 50% of the time 31 35 12 18 About 75% of the time 8 8 8 9 Rarely or never 5 5 4 14 16. Bank angler tolerances: entanglements. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response ("doesn't matter" responses not included). 0 -1 52 47 54 82 2 -3 19 18 38 10 4 -5 15 18 3 5 5+ 14 17 5 3 17, Bank angler tolerances: boat interference. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response ("doesn't matter" responses not included). All bank anglers 0 87 1 -2 8 3 -4 2 5 -7 2 All bank Bank anglers Bank anglers Bank anglers anglers targeting reds targeting targeting kings silvers All bank Bank anglers Bank angers Bank anglers anglers targeting reds targeting targeting kings silvers All bank Bank anglers Bank anglers Bank anglers anglers targeting reds targeting targeting kings silvers 18. Drift angler tolerances: boat interference. Percent of respondents reporting each response., ,.among those offering a response (°doesn't matter" responses not included in percentages), Ali drift anglers All drift anglers 2009 1992 Rarely or never 27 31 About 25% of the time 51 56 About 50% of the time 19 8 About 75% of the time 2 3 Nearly all the time 1 1 19. Drift angler tolerances: fishing competition. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response "doesn't matter" responses not included in percentages). All drift anglers All drift anglers 2009 1992 Rarely or never 18 23 About 25% of the time 48 40 About 50% of the time 28 26 About 75% of the time 4 6 Nearly all the time 3 4 20. Drift angler tolerances: put -in and take -out time. Percent of all drift anglers reporting responses within categories....among those offering a response "doesn't matter" responses not included in percentages). Range (minutes) Put -in time Take -out time 0to5 18 23 6 to 10 48 40 11 to 15 28 26 16 to 20 4 6 21 to 30 3 4 and CD, 21. Powerboat angler tolerances: boat interference. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response "doesn't matter responses not included). Rarely or never About 25% of the time About 50% of the time About 75% of the time Nearly all the time 22. Powerboat angler tolerances: fishing competition. Percent of respondents reporting each response....among those offering a response "doesn't matter" responses not included). Rarely or never About 25% of the time About 50% of the time About 75% of the time Nearly ail the time 23. Powerboat angler tolerances: put-in and take -out time. Percent of all drift anglers reporting responses within categories....among those offering a response "doesn't matter" responses not included). Put -in time for Range (minutes) powerboat anglers targeting kings O to 5 60 6to15 19 16to30 15 Over 30 6 24, Powerboat angler reported put -in and take -out times (average in minutes) at different locations. Eagle Rock Pillars Centennial Swiftwater Bings Lower Skilak Put in 2.7 2.0 1.8 3.0 1.0 2,5 Take out 2.7 2.9 1,6 0.6 1.0 0.5 Powerboaters targeting kings 35 48 10 1 5 Powerboaters targeting kings 24 34 26 9 7 Put -in time for powerboat anglers not targeting kings 78 12 5 1 Powerboaters not targeting kings 39 44 11 2 5 Powerboaters not targeting kings 31 38 18 6 8 Take out time for powerboat anglers targeting kings 56 21 17 6 1992 all powerboaters 23 46 23 5 3 1992 all powerboaters 21 43 29 4 3 Take -out time for powerboat anglers not targeting kings 75 13 11 1 Pa 25. General satisfaction ratings Note from main report: ''Visitor satisfaction has frequently been measured in recreation settings (Heberlein Vaske 1977; Kuss, et al., 1990). However, satisfaction is not a particularly useful measure for assessing recreation experience quality. In addition, satisfaction levels are typically quite high, although consumptive users such as hunters and anglers consistently show lower satisfaction compared to non consumptive users such as hikers and rafters (Vaske, et al., 1982; Vaske et al., 2009), For many well- documented reasons, satisfaction is usually weakly or unrelated to use, crowding, or impact measures, and it is usually too general a variable to evaluate conditions managers might actually influence (Shelby Heberlein, 1986). Having noted these limitations, general satisfaction ratings are often requested by managing agencies, and they are included in this study for completeness (as measured on a five point scale from (1) "very unsatisfied" to (5) "very satisfied Bank anglers Mean 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.1 Median 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 satisfied or very satisfied 78 75 77 82 Drift anglers Mean 4.6 4.1 4.2 4.7 Median 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 satisfied or very satisfied 91 76 81 95 Powerboaters Mean 4,3 4.1 4.6 Median 5.0 5.0 5.0 satisfied or very satisfied 81 77 88 Non anglers Mean 4.6 Median 5.0 rYci satisfied or very satisfied 91 Lower Middle Upper 26. What predicts satisfaction? Several regression models were developed to help explain satisfaction ratings. Summary information about the total explained variance (R model strength (F), regression coefficients (r) for specific variables, and variables that were not significant are noted. For all bank anglers: R =.07 F =9.4 crowding r -.15 number of hooked fish r =.17 reported incidents of courteous behavior r=.12 Variables not significant: angler proximity, number of discourteous behavior incidents. For all drift anglers R F =15.6 Hooked fish r =.13 Boat interference impact r -.17 Variables not related: crowding, number of courteous behavior incidents, number of discourteous behavior incidents. For king anglers in powerboats (lower and middle) R =.09 F =6.8 Boat interference is related: -.20 Number of fish hooked is related: .20 Variables not related: courteous behavior, discourteous behavior, crowding, reported fishing competition. For non -king anglers in powerboats (both segments) R =.04, F =12.3 Fishing competition is related: -.21 but weak. Variables not related: discourteous behavior, courteous behavior, number of hooked fish, reported boating interference. Re<:7 27. Correlations between impacts and use levels for bank anglers. Bivariate correlations between various reported impacts (overall crowding, angling proximity, fishing competition etc.) and various use measures. Only statistically significant correlations are shown (p<.05). Correlation with... Overall Angler Fishing Line Boat crowding proximity competition entanglements interference Upper River Bank Anglers Ferry passenger counts .55 -,32 .26 .37 Ferry vehicle counts .54 -.31 .25 .37 Ferry Sportsman visitors .45 -.31 .23 .32 Sportsman launches .44 -.21 .23 .26 Sanctuary counts .40 -.14 .17 RR campground users .23 -.14 RR day parking users .52 -.31 .23 .30 Jim's Landing vehicle counts .24 -.15 .15 .17 Jim's Landing trailer counts .24 -.11 .14 .12 .23 Use level evaluation .32 -.09 .24 Angler proximity -.32 Fishing competition .34 -,35 Line entanglements .29 -.35 .26 Boat interference Middle River Bank anglers Bing's vehicle counts Bing's trailer counts Lower River bank anglers Pillars vehicles .38 Pillars boats .39 Centennial vehicles .41 Centennial trailers .37 ni'..','L:ence ancj Oci.:ar*v 2131 .47 -.29 .39 .32 .29 .45 -.21 ,33 .30 .30 .26 .35 .26 .34 -.22 .33 .40 -.09 .35 .34 .21 .24 Number of boats (highest count per day) Average perceived crowding score 28. Relationships between boat counts and reported impacts for Lower River powerboat anglers. Percent Average Reported Reported reporting reported level of boat level of fishing Average Average some incidents of interference competition put -in time take -out time degree of discourteous (on 5 point (on 5 point (minutes) (minutes) crowding behavior scale) scale) 0to30 2.2 36 0 1.1 1,3 1.2 1.7 30 to 60 1.9 23 0 1.1 1.7 1.5 2.6 60to90 2.2 37 0.6 1.1 1.3 3.0 1.4 90 to 120 2.2 30 0.1 1.2 1.7 0 0,4 120 to 150 2.7 I 0 1.3 1.0 1.7 1.7 150 to 180 3.6 70 0.9 1.4 1.8 4.7 4.1 180 to 210 3.9 79 1.3 1.3 1.7 7.2 3.8 210 to 240 4.3 76 0.3 1.5 1.9 4.0 5.6 240 to 270 3.5 0 1.1 2.7 5.0 5.0 270 to 300 300 5.3 78 0.4 1.5 2.1 5.4 6.0 Introduction This section of the supplemental report provides additional results from the user, guide, and landowner follow -up surveys. Readers are encouraged to review results in combination with specific survey items to identify possible responses. 1. Percent of users reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub groups (columns). 2 2. Most important and second most important opportunities for users. 3 3. Percent of users reporting most important opportunity (rows) by second most important opportunity (columns). 4 4. Percent of guides reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub groups (columns). 5 5. Most important opportunities for powerboat and driftboat guides. 5 6. Guides: Most important opportunity (rows) by second most important opportunity (columns). 5 7. Other guide profile information 6 8. Percent of landowners reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub groups (columns). 7 9. Most important opportunities for landowners. 8 10. Other landowner profile information 8 11. Percent of users that own land (by subgroup). 8 12. Percent of driftboat anglers and scenic floaters that use motors (and where) 9 13. Percent of landowners (who use float craft) that use motors (and where) 9 14. Average age and percent male among respondents, 10 15. Percent Alaskan residents by sub- group. 10 16. Percent of user sub groups who live in Kenai watershed and host visitors. 11 17. Non -local use: Median days visiting Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and percentages staying in accommodations 11 18, Average days hosting in and out -of -state visitors among landowners 11 19. Percent reporting "feeling crowded" (in general) 12 20. Percent of guides checking different responses to crowding (among those who felt crowded) 12 21. Percent of users and landowners reporting changed conditions in quality of trips or management over the years. 13 22. Percent of guides reporting changed conditions in quality of trips or management over the years. 13 23. Percent of users reporting they have reduced or stopped using certain segments and months. 14 24. Percent of guides reporting they have reduced or stopped using certain segments or months. 14 25. Percent of all users reporting support/opposition to general management strategies. 15 26. Differences between user groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons) 16 27. Differences between guide groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons). 17 28. Differences between guide groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons). 18 29. Differences between user groups on specific actions for the entire river (mean comparisons). 19 30. Differences between guide groups on specific actions for the entire river {mean comparisons). 20 31, Differences between user groups on development actions (mean comparisons). 21 32. Differences between guide groups on development actions (mean comparisons) 22 33. Differences between user groups on entire regulation actions (mean comparisons). 23 34. Differences between guide groups on entire river regulation actions (mean comparisons). 24 35. Differences between user groups on segment regulation actions (mean comparisons). 25 36. Differences between guide groups on segment regulation actions (mean comparisons) 26 37. Differences between user and guide groups on "drift-only' questions (mean comparisons). 27 38. Differences between guide groups on "drift- only" questions (mean comparisons). 27 39. Percent support/oppose on "drift- only" questions (frequencies and sample sizes). 28 40. Differences between user and guide groups on number "drift- only" days to add per week (mean comparisons). 29 41. Percent support /oppose more drift-only days (key groups). 30 42. Percent of guides who would utilize "drift- only' days if they were implemented. 31 43. Percent of responses to "philosophy of use limits" question among users and landowners 32 44. Percent of responses to "philosophy of use limits" question among guides. 33 45. Percent responding to "registration program" question 34 46. Percent responding to "parking limits" question (and average preferred limit length) 34 47. Percent supportloppose use limit questions among users and landowners. 35 48. Percent supportloppose use limit questions among guides 36 49. Percent answering "Lower River capacity" questions and percent responding among users and guides. 37 50. Percent answering "Lower River capacity" questions and percent responding among users and guides 38 51. Group comparisons for attitudes toward guide/unguided issues among users and landowners. 39 52. Group comparisons for attitudes toward guide/unguided issues between among users (mean scores). 40 totTer 2C,10 River Recreates Study e Suppkumanfial Report 8 Acitiitiontai :eitevey resi..dts Additional information about follow-up survey respondent characteristics 1. Percent of users reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub-groups (columns). Sub-groups (columns) determined by their "most important" opportunity (see main report for discussion). Respondents could choose any that apply" for opportunity categories (rows). Bank Driftboat Powerboat Scenic Campers anglers anglers anglers rafters To n n n Bank angling Personal use from beach 54 17 26 10 11 6 1 Lower River 125 39 30 11 64 34 Middle River 170 54 52 19 65 34 Upper River 189 59 123 45 50 26 Drift angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Personal use from boat Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River Camping 20 6 67 25 22 12 29 9 138 50 29 15 65 20 226 83 52 27 18 6 27 10 71 37 50 16 45 16 138 72 34 10 50 18 111 58 3 151. 0 0 7 30 2 6 •7 30 4 12 13 57 0 3 7 0 9 21 0 0 2 9 5 22 0 0 0 3 13 0 4 17 3 2 9 3 <1 6 2 5 3 4 12 1 4 7 2 16 6 6 3 8 24 3 13 16 5 55 20 15 8 21 64 3 13 97 31 65 24 35 18 3 9 23 100 2 2. Most important and second most important opportunities for users. i1otaTr Rtv21 Rscrtniltio, q..'t Part Note: Sub-groups determined by "most important' opportunity. Bank anglers (n.318) Personal use from beach Lower River Middle River Upper River Unknown Drift anglers (274) Lower River Middle River Upper River Unknown Powerboat anglers (191) Personal use from boat Lower River Middle River Unknown Scenic rafters (33) Lower River Middle River Upper River Campers (23) Undetermined Total. Most important opportunity n Percent 26 62 107 99 24 27 53 187 7 8 20 34 31 8 10 19 68 3 26 .6 2 96 50 21 7 47 5 22 12 4 4 25 23 13 852 12 0 12 0 76 28 55 Second most important opportunity Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboat anglers n Percent 12 4 6 35 11 3 39 12 11 48 15 54 9 15 27 3 5 9 0 1 0 6 2 30 9 7 17 26 Percent n Percent 2 4 20 5 13 21 15 3 7 11 8 14 58 30 5 21 11 7 4 8 4 21 11 4 2 15 13 5 18 9 24 9 ....H 15 <1 2 11 3 10 0 0 4 3 32 0 0 2 2 17 Opt:Ober 2010 Recreatnn Study* N!:Jp=.:.!:-.rt: Part -5 3. Percent of users reporting most important opportunity (rows) by second most important opportunity (columns). Any Any Any Any Any personal bank driftboat powerboat scenic Camping n use fishing fishing fishing rafting fishing Personal use from beach 0 52 20 12 4 12 25 Personal use from boat 0 20 20 52 8 0 25 Lower River bank 2 61 12 15 2 8 52 Middle River bank 4 55 16 19 0 6 96 Upper River bank 14 26 •29 101. 4 17 90 Lower River drift 4 8 50 33 4 0 24 Middle River drift 4 15 60 9 13 0 47 Upper River drift 4 33 35 14 10 4 177 Lower River power 20 36 12 29 1 2 94 Middle River power 3 25 50 20 0 3 40 Upper River scenic 5 15 •40 5 30 5 20 Camping 5 60 15 5 15 0 20 Conttle7,c:E: 201C: PaZ2 4 StRt(- Suwia,5wItlit 3C 4. Percent of guides reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub•groups (columns). Powerboat guides Bank angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Drift angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River n 48 31 3 67 43 27 15 10 30 64 150.98 8 17 103 67 8 2 3 0 .9 .6 4 9 6 14 All Power Drift Drift angling •Lower River •3 2 6 Middie River 14 7 30 Upper River 28 14 64 Powerboat angling Lower River 116 57 76 Middie River 29 13 19 Driftboat Scenic rafting guides guides 6 1 57 1 17 0 •9 2 30 5 5. Most important opportunities for powerboat and driftboat guides. Any Other Any Any drift bank power scenic Lower River drift 33 67 0 0 3 Middle River drift 29 71 0 0 14 Upper River drift 30 30 26 14 27 Lower River power 13 7 78 3 112 Middle River power 7 17 76 0 29 Other commercial services 29 19 15 32 1 14 2 22 45 21 42 28 38 81 1 14 2 22 83 38 20 '13 36 .77 1 'A: .14 1 11 58 27 0 n 14 2 22 54 25 14 3 33 98 45 0 1 11 46 21 14 33 1.62 75 0 2 0 29 1 71 0 6. Guides: Most important opportunity (rows) by second most important opportunity (columns). 22 All guides together 113 52 22 5 2 11 1 7 0 28 13 7. Other guide profile information. 65 guides (30% of guide sample) own land, Of those who own land... 51% on lower 36% on middle 13% on upper 85% have house on land 9% don't live there 38% live there part-time 53% live there full-time Mvar Recreatipr-LStE..4dy 13 fasults 69% use a boat from there (n=47, or 22% of entire sample) 59% fish from property (n=41 or 19% of total sample) 32% have a dock 38% have fishing platform 45% have natural erosion control materials 14% have non-natural rip rap 12% offer cabins 2% offer rooms 16% offer other 70% don't offer lodging ana Coct Pa4p: 8. Percent of landowners reporting participation in other opportunities (rows) for various sub-groups (columns). Dip beach Dip boat Bank angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Drift angling Lower River 5 Middle River 6 8 8 Upper River 9 .12 13 Powerboat angling Lower River 25 34 33 45 5 Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River Camping R....Erp. n 7 17 Bank Reanrch 210 Drift Power Other All n n n 'A n 9 0 0 8 8 2 9 17 8 23 3 21 50 50 3 14 73 16 22 46 62 3 17 23 6 5 7 16 22 11 15 0 0 0 0 5 7 14 28 28 14 49 24 21 46 46 1 5 96 46 43 14 14 3 14 40 19 0 12 12 2 9 24 12 57 18 18 2 9 34 16 93 22 22 2 9 46 22 63 64 5 24 96 46 36 62 63 0 0 100 48 0 9 9 3 14 17 8 36 21 21 4 19 46 22 50 8 8 5 24 31 15 0 .5 .1 5 6 3 9. Most important opportunities for landowners. All Dip beach Dip boat Bank angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Drift angling Lower River Middle River Upper River Powerboat angling Lower River Middle River Scenic rafting Lower River Middle River Upper River Undetermined yes 4 2 21 10 13 6 47 23 10 5 1 <1 5 43 21 35 17 2 1 1 <1 5 2 15 6 10 q:eseapz air C3rt5.4.11tg Octobei r 10. Other landowner profile information, 41 live there full -time; slightly higher percentages on Lower (49 vs. Middle (38 76% fish from property (n =151); Much lower on Upper (50 29% have fishing platforms. Differences by segment: 35% Lower River, 44% Middle River, 10% Upper River, 41% have natural erosion control materials, Differences by segment: 42% Lower, 44% Middle, 21 Upper. 11. Percent of users that own and (by subgroup). Bank Drift Powerboat Scenic Campers All anglers anglers anglers rafters 4 2 7 3 0 n =30 Mver Rev. Study Repc,A Addltior resdts 12. Percent of driftboat anglers and scenic floaters that use motors (and where). Number answering 66 never use a motor 49 against tide on Lower River 17 trolling on Middle River 15 travelling upstream on Middle 20 Skilak access to Middle 17 Skilak crossing from Upper 29 Drift Scenic anglers rafters C;ortfk.Nlic All never use a motor 44 46 29 against tide on Lower River 10 3 7 trolling on Middle River 7 4 5 travelling upstream on Middle 18 3 10 Skilak access to Middle 20 6 11 Skilak crossing from Upper 35 18 16 13. Percent of landowners (who use float craft) that use motors (and where). Lower drift Middle drift Upper drift users users users n=23 n= 206 n=359 18 35 11 28 33 34 14. Average age and percent male among respondents. •AI users: 50 Bank anglers 52 Drift anglers 47 Powerboater anglers 51 Scenic rafters 47 Campers 51 Guided drift anglers 48 46 Unguided drift anglers Guided powerboat anglers Unguided powerboat anglers All landowners Bank anglers Drift anglers Powerboaters All guides Powerboat guides Driftboat guides Scenic guides 15. Percent Alaskan residents by sub-group. Bank anglers Drift anglers 61 Powerboaters 67 Scenic rafters 50 Campers 62 Guided drift anglers 39 Unguided drift anglers 79 Guided powerboat anglers 84 Unguided powerboat anglers 36 Ok '85 Bank angler 82 Powerboaters 87 Other •:•8l 1-4 j, FON 41 Suvn.Nernm .kiOtinnal..J sunfey Mean age male 54 49 63 65 57 61 52 T;g OCW ber 83 81 87 88 52 48 85 87 84 91 82 85 67 86 16. Percent of user sub-groups who live in Kenai watershed and host visitors. Average days hosting out of state friends/family Reiport tf wRvey Bank anglers Drift anglers 18. Average days hosting in and out-of•state visitors among landowners. Powerboat Scenic anglers rafters All 14 15 17 9 16 Median days hosting out of state 10 10 14 9 10 friends/family n for these questions.... 43 50 66 2 Average days hosting in-state 13 17 20 27 18 friends/family Median days hosting in state 10 10 27 10 friends/family Inter-quartile range for both (in 5 to 20 5 to 20 5 to 20 5 to 20 5 to 20 and out-of-state friends/family 17. Non-local use: Median days visiting Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and percentages staying in accommodations (Among those who do not "live in the Kenai River watershed (80,3% of user sample)). Bank Drift Powerboat Scenic Campers anglers anglers anglers rafters and mixed n for these questions 275 224 125 30 30 684 Median days on Kenai Peninsula 10 6 8 3 7 8 Median days in Alaska 14 10 10 10 10 11 Percerit... Stay with family and friends 19 18 22 13 17 19 Stay at hotels and motels 19 24 22 30 0 21 Stay at B&B lodges 7 8 12 10 0 8 Camped in a campground 43 29 30 20 63 36 Camped in the backcountry 5 15 6 7 7 8 Visited just for the day 13 16 7 13 7 12 Bank Drift Powerboat anglers anglers anglers Other All Average days hosting out of 23 23 10: (14) 20 (11) 20,1 (14) state friends/family (median 15) Average days hosting in-state 31 34 (15) 23 (20) 18 (15) 26 (15) friends/family (median 15) n for these questions__ 61 10 84 16 167 All Resre...er..!.:-,71 and L:':1 PaCle 11 'Att. rc- Part a CF=0',5 Additional information about crowding, responses to crowding, past use and conditions 19. Percent reporting "feeling crowded" (in general). Never feel crowded I enjoy the crowds I sometimes feel crowded All users 1992 6 4 90 All users 2009 14 13 73 Bank anglers 9 15 •70 Drift anglers 15 9 72 Powerboat anglers 15 10 75 Non-anglers 22 10 59 Landowners 2009 13 6 81 All guides 1992 5 10 85 All guides 2009 11 16 74 Drift guides 7 9 84 Power guides 12 18 70 20. Percent of guides checking different responses to crowding (among those who felt crowded). Note: Users and landowners reported in main report table. All guides 1992 All guides 2009 Drift guides Powerboat guides Resign to crowded experience 51 52 66 50 Try to avoid others (in same area) 60 48 72 43 Plan: other segments not offered 30 49 25 Plan: same segment, new time of day not offered 25 47 20 Plan: same segment, middle of week 31 18 38 12 Become dissatisfied 27 13 26 9 Plan: other segments day of week not offered 12 28 8 Plan: same segment, off season 18 5 9 4 Plan: other segments off season not offered 4 9 3 Go less frequently not offered 3 0 4 Do other types of recreation not offered 5 6 5 Go to another river 27 0 0 0 CH.!..mfrim:nce Rezeeardl aEld OrAk 2010 FdVS:r EE:tUdV 66 SI. Fit foHow-- v...Frvey resuKs 21. Percent of users and landowners reporting changed conditions in quality of trips or management over the years. All users Overall quality of trips (mean) 3.2 Substantially improved 7 Slightly improved 20 Same 35 Slightly declined 22 Substantially declined 16 don't know (not in above) 22 Overall quality of management (mean) 2.8 Substantially improved 12 Slightly improved 27 Same 40 Slightly declined 12 Substantially declined 10 Vo don't know not in above) 26 All Overall quality of trips (mean) 3.3 Substantially improved 8 Slightly iinproved 17 Same 32 Slightly declined 25 Substantially declined 19 don't know (not in above) 4 Overall quality of management (mean) 3.2 Substanfially improved 10 Slightly improved 20 Same 30 Slightly declined 19 Substantially declined 21 don't know (riot in above) 5 All- Bank Drift Power collapsed 27 22 22, Percent of guides reporting changed conditions in quality of trips or management over the years. All. collapsed 25 40 2.9 3,5 34 3.0 3.8 11 4 7 6 2 25 17 15 21 15 40 29 32 47 24 16 27 25 18 21 8 23 23 9 38 22 25 13 42 10 2,7 2.9 2.9 2.4 3.1 13 8 9 28 4 30 24 27 22 25 35 47 40 34 37 14 10 12 9 17 8 11 13 6 17 25 28 18 41 13 Drift Power 3,3 3.2 3 9 16 18 37 32 37 20 8 20 11 1 3.0 3.3 3 11 23 19 54 24 14 21 6 25 13 2 Non- Land- anglers owners ComiW 20W kero."4 Rgviar 71 6 ort Pan 8 psr AdditioniC 23. Percent of users reporting they have reduced or stopped using certain segments and months. All 1993 Bank Drift Power Non. Land anglers owners No same segments and seasons 64 78 69 61 57 70 36 Yes reduced some use 27 22 24 27 30 25 37 Yes —stopped some use 9 7 12 12 5 27 24. Percent of guides reporting they have reduced or stopped using certain segments or months. Ail Drift Power No —same segments and seasons 75 72 76 Yes reduced some use 19 21 19 yes stopped some use 6 8 5 Const. 201:* Kenai St :Ay linential Rep At 3 AdaitionaH foliow-p SUirVey Additional information about general management strategies 25. Percent of all users reporting support/opposition to general management strategies. Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly Strongly Don't oppose oppose support support know 'Leave no trace" education 3 3 12 24 59 2 Regulations to address biophysical 5 6 15 26 48 3 Harden high use areas 4 5 15 30 46 "Etiquette education 4 3 22 27 44 4 Expand or improve facilities 5 7 13 29 46 2 Regulations to improve boating safety 4 5 23 25 44 6 increase law enforcement and patrols 5 6 22 24 43 2 Boater safety education programs 4 3 34 22 37 6 Develop new facilities 7 11 17 26 40 2 Develop more access to redistribute 11 9 12 24 44 2 Zoning regs, to separate conflicts 20 16 26 18 20 6 Limit use through permits 36 17 20 15 12 4 1 Removed from percentages in support/oppose. 26. Differences between user groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons). "Leave no trace' education to address biophysical impacts (such as human 4.3 waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire rings, vegetation loss) Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel/paved trails) to reduce impacts from use 'Etiquette" education to address social impacts Expand or improve facilities to handle Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits in "thru lanes") Boater safety education programs Develop new facilities (such as launches, day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume of use Develop more access to less-used sections of river to help redistribute use Zoning regulations to separate conflicting users (boat vs, bank anglers, motorized vs. non-motorized) Limit use through permit reservation systems 'Based on Scheff e tests at p<.05. rie'rAr St.:4):03 Repurf 3 roatjeS Land- All Bank Drift Power owners 4.4 :44 4.0 F p Different groups Power from others 4.1 4,2 4,1 3.9 4.0 3.1 .044 Power-bank 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.0 Drift from others the volume of use 4.0 4,2 4.0 3.7 3.9 12.8 .001 Power from others Increase law enforcement and patrols 3.9 4,1 3,9 3.7 4.1 005 Power bank 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 4.0 Drift from others 3.8 4.1 3.3 4.0 3.5 27.3 .001 Drift from others 2,5 2.4 2.7 2.4 2,6 3.1 .047 Drift from others and ':',C1r e 2010 leave no trace" education to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire iings, vegetation loss) Harden high use areas (with boardwalks, stairs, or gravel/paved trails) to reduce impacts from use "Etiquette" education to address social impacts Expand or improve facilifies to handle the volume of use Regulations to improve boating safety (such as no wake zones, speed limits in "thru lanes") Boater safety education programs Develop new facilities (such as launches, day use areas, and campgrounds) to handle the volume of use Develop more access to less-used sections of river to help redistribute 3.5 use Zoning regulations to separate conflicting users (boat vs. bank anglers, motorized vs. non-motorized) Limit use through permit reservation systems 'Based on Scheffe tests at p<.05. Recr.Q:E8 Suic.pk811888 8 F,wk 8 27. Differences between guide groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons). Note: Drift and powerboat anglers means also shown for comparison. All Drift guides guides n=41 Regulations to address biophysical impacts (such as human waste, fire 3.9 4.5 3,6 4.2 .001 4.1 rings, vegetation loss) Ccrifkilenc :11:;.:? arid it:5 5 Or 2010 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.1 Power guides n=135 3.3 4.2 3,0 4.7 .001 4.0 3.7 4,6 4,7 4.6 p Drift Power users users 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.9 Increase law enforcement and patrols 3.9 4.3 3.8 2.2 .031 3.9 3,7 3.8 3.0 3.7 -3.1 .002 3.3 4.0 1.7 74 001 3,2 2,5 2,7 3.5 2.3 4.3 .001 2.7 2.4 Litter and human waste Discourteous behavior Amount of access for bank anglers Tramping of shore vegetation by anglers on wildlife from users Powerboat effects on bank erosion Boating safety f#. of bank anglers during red runs Hydrocarbon pollution levels Amount of facilities to handle use Bear -human interactions Water clarity turbidity of boats on Upper River during reds Conflicts between guides /unguided users Conflicts between landowners users of boats On Lower :River in July Conflicts between motorized/non-motor of boats on Middle River during reds of boats on Upper River after reds Visual impacts of development (houses Visual impacts of docks of boats on Middle River after reds of boats on Lower River after July scenic rafting trips on Upper River Typical n 28. Differences between guide groups on general management strategies (mean comparisons). This table shows average importance scores for issues across groups from the follow -up survey. Groups were defined by whether they identified a segment/type of use as one of their top two "most important trips." We have ordered the issues from "most" to least" important for bank anglers on the tipper River. Some key results have been highlighted: results in red are noticeably higher than other groups; results in blue are noticeably lower. Upper River 4.67 4.27 4,19 4.04 3.87 3.85 3,79 76 3.71 3,65 3.63 3.58 3.30 3.30 3.14 2,99 2.96 2.91 2.88 2.84 2.80 2.65 2 2 2.?;,1 0222,33321 2310 Bank anglers Middle River 4.53 4.16. 4.33 3.98 3.71 3.80 3,79 3.65 3:67 3.42 3.71 3.00 3,45 3,49 3.49 n J.UL Lower River 4.64 4.2 8.::. 4.23 4,12 3.74 4.00 3.85 3.89 3.40 3.76 2.98 3.39 3.51 3.21 3.41 3.24 3.08 3.14 3.02 2; 2.69 2.74 2.87 2.78 .02 2.89 2.70 2.87 198 2.85 2.66 2.96 2.91 3.`s 2.68 2,94 3.12 2.87 2.95 2.49 2.33 2.33 2.28 179 -225 167 -201 99 -134 187 -213 163 -200 Powerboat anglers Driftboat anglers Middle t ower River River 4.37 4.50 4,18 4.14 3.40 3.57 4.13: 4,08 3,52 3.52 4.26 2.96 2.52 Upper River 4.66 4:09 3.27 4.09 3.93 4.24 4.05 4.23 3.57 3.57 3,44 2.5k 3.94 4.00 3.82 3,87 3.52 3.59 3.13 3.11 3,60 3.51 2,5 3.80 2.87 2.77 3.49 3.45 3.10 3.06 3.24 a.3 Middle River 4.63 4.21 3.3[F 4.22 3.99 411 3.81 3.11 3.46 2.81 2.73 4 2.89 3,09 2.62 2.51 221 -280 127 -153 3.40 3.53 3.25 344 3,55 x.41 3,45 2,96 ArVi"? Additional information about management actions 29. Differences between user groups on specific actions for the entire river (mean comparisons). For the entire river... Increase patrols and litter pick-up at public easements More restrooms in high use bank angler areas More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling Develop fishing platforms in some areas closed to bank fishing (to re- 4.0 open parts of them) More fish cleaning stations in general More fencing /.signs to direct users to bank areas that can withstand the use More fishing platforms stairs to protect banks at public easements (informal access areas) Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants 1 Based on Scheff e tests at p<.05. cL 201-i") Land MI Bank Drift Power owners 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 3.8 4.3 4.3 3.9 4.2 3.7 3.9 3,8 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.6 3,6 3.7 o1 P 3.3 .038 16,9 .001 p Different group& Power bank Drift from others 5.8 ,003 Power drift All three users different All three user groups different 11.4 .001 Drift bank N. Differences between guide groups on specific actions for the entire river (mean comparisons). For the entire river... Increase patrols and lifter pick-up at public easements More restrooms in high use bank angler areas More vegetation restoration in areas where there has been bank trampling Fav pa.r. 8 etddit:On st:tvey Develop fishing platforms ;n some areas closed to bank fishing (to re- 3.8 3.6 open parts of thern) All Drift Power t More fencing signs to direct users to bank areas that can withstand the use 4.0 4.3 3,9 2,5 .012 4.3 4.2 4,3 4.2 4.2 4.2 More fish cleaning stations in general 4.0 3.9 4,0 More fishing platforms stairs to protect banks at public easements 3.5 3.6 3.6 (informal access areas) Manage fish carcasses to reduce bear attractants p 4.1 3.0 All users for comparison 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 K. R ouea tI or btudy SupOnmrdal Re.13;at Additiona[ 31. Differences between user groups on development actions (mean comparisons). Middle River... Typical n Upper River... Organize the "spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Ali Bank Drift Power F Lower River... New launch in Cunningham Park (mile 6) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and docks at Pillars (mile 12.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.8 Improve restrooms and access across tidal mud at Cunningham Park (mile 3.9 4.1 3.7 4.0 6) New boat restroorns near Mud Is.] Beaver Creek (mile 10) Typical n New launch on Funny River Road across from Morgan's (miie 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.0 New boaT'restrooms near Killey River outlet New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.2 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 Typical n 472 191 200 81 Confi Re.zear2h and ConsuRing Odloba2 20 3.8 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.4 .034 Not significant at p<.05 3.9 3.7 3.8 4.1 3.5 .032 Not significant at p<.05 253 87 54 112 30% of entire sample. p Different groups 389 148 126 115 46% of entire sample. 55% of entire sample. a212- 32. Differences between guide groups on development actions (mean comparisons). Lower River... New launch in Cunningham Park (mile 6) New launch near the Pastures (mile 7 to 8) Expand parking and docks at Pillars (mile 12.5) New launch at Ciechanski (mile 15) Improve restrooms and access across tidal mud at Cunningham Park (mile 6) New boat restrooms near Mud Is, Beaver Creek (mile 10) Typical n Middle River... New launch on Funny River Road across from Morgan's (mile 31) Expand docks at Bing's Landing New boat restrooms near Kiley River outlet New boat restrooms near Skilak Lake outlet Typical n tipper River... Organize the 'spider web of trails" at popular bank fishing areas into a smaller number of formal trails Improved road maintenance on Skilak Lake Road Explore alternative ways to manage carcasses and other bear attractants in the Russian River area Typical n Mver Recieatorli SitHtly Sfjprhaerital Rq foHow-up resv...0;t2 All Drift Power 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.6 4.4 4.2 4.4 3,9 17 •3.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.4 4,6 135-145 11-15 121-127 3.6 3.4 3,7 i20 30 90 3.7 3.9 3.5 44 44 3.6 3.4 3.7 70-75 35 35 p 3.4 3.5 3.4 4.0 3.6 4.2 -2.2 .031 4.1 3,8 4.2 All users for comparison 3,8 3,9 3.7 3.9 253 4.1 41 4.0 4,0 389 3.7 3.8 472 33. Differences between user groups on entire regulation actions (mean comparisons). For the entire river_ Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel" regulations (particularly in silver season) Create brochures and internee media showing how to boat and fish during high density periods Offer a one day course about how to operate powerboats during high density periods Require a "Kenai boating license' for powerboat operators (includes a written test) Require all boaters to wear PFDs (life jackets) Close rnore areas to bank fishing where existing use is trampling 3.3 3.1 vegetation Restrictions on number of fish allowed to be cleaned when others are waiting 'Based on Scheffe tests at p<,05. KeruA Rh,u s 390enleab1 Rapc5.1: P.;6oit tc. smvey Rel and Comviitling Different All Bank Drift Power groupsi Power from 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.4 12.5 ,001 3.5 others 3.4 3.8 3.5 2.7 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.7 All three different Drift from others F P Land owners 3.8 Power from 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.1 11.3 .001 3.2 others 35.9 .001 3.3 3.6 3.1 RNer Pa411 34. Differences between guide groups on entire river regulation actions (mean comparisons). For the entire river... 180 42 133 Clarify and strictly enforce no anchoring in channel" regulations 3.8 4.1 3.7 (particularly in silver season) Create brochures and interne t media showing how to boat and fish during 4.2 high :density periods Offer a one day course about how to operate powerboats during high 4.3 4.4 4.2 density periods Require a "Kenai boating license' for powerboat operators (includes Ia written test) Require all boaters to wear PFDs (life jackets) Close more areas to bank fishing where existing use is trampling vegetation Restrictions on number of fish allowed to be cleaned when others are waiting Cormultng 2010 Users for All Drift Power t P Difference with users comparison 2.7 2.9 2.6 3.8 2.3 3.7 1.8 8.7 .001 3.4 3.5 More support by guides 3,4 More support by guides 3.0 Less support by power guides 35. Differences between user groups on segment regulation actions (mean comparisons). Lower river... No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open 'driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Stagger guided start times in July to reduce launch Typical ft Middle river... No wake zones in high density areas such as Swiftwater, Dot's Landing or "3rd Hole" near Killey River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Restrict drift boats from traveling upstream using kickers (to minimize large wakes) Upper river... Develop fire education enforcement program in Russian River area 1 Based on Schee tests at p<.05. 111,:a12;- River $udy %".gp P Irt 8 Add itiC). All Bank Drift Power F P 3.8 4,1 4.2 3.3 3,5 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.6 3,4 3.5 294 100 64 3.4 3.6 3.9 3,4 3.4 3.7 Land Different group& owners 15.9 ,001 3.7 Power from others 3.7 3.4 130 125 19.8 .001 3.6 Power from others 5.4 .005 3.3 Bank from others CErcifluence =And Cop:au:Ting 20 25 36. Differences between guide groups on segment regulation actions (mean comparisons). Lower river... 140 13 No wake zones in high density areas such as Beaver Creek, Chicago, Big Eddy, or Pillars Regulations to maintain an open 'driving lane (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Stagger guided start times in July to reduce launch congestion Typical n Middle river... •No wake zones in high density areas such as Swiftwater, Dots Landing, or '3rd Hole' near Killey River Regulations that maintain an open "driving lane" (for boats on step) through some of these same areas Restrict drift boats from traveling upstream using kickers (to minimize large wakes) Upper river... Develop fire education enforcement program in Russian River area All Drift Power t 1.7 125 66 2.2 33 35 31 all users for comparison 127 2.7 4.5 2.4 4.5 .001 .026 294 4.0 2.7 3,1 2.5 2.0 .049 3.6 1.6 92 River Reuss:U.13n Strudy SuppkrEnrriVez;:: karirt Additiora1 fashow-up survey rersufts Additional information about "drift-only" issues 37. Differences between user and guide groups on "drift-only" questions (mean comparisons). (5 point scale, with 1=strongly oppose and 5=strongly support). Percent answering these questions among users n 101 In general, more "drift only' days should be added to the Lower River. (guides) In general, more 'drift only" clays should be added to the Middle River. (guides) 32 50 44 138 3,6 4.3 2.4 4.4 1.9 4.5 If "drift only" days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be 3.4 3.5 3.3 one segment available for powerboats), {guides) 2.9 38. Differences between guide groups on "drift-only" questions (mean comparisons). Percent answering these questions 88 n 42 In general, more "drift only' days should be added to the Lower River. 4.4 In general, more "drift only' days should be added to the Middle River. 4.5 If "drift only days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available for powerboats). Bank Drift Power Others Land Fit 83 17 51 107 3,6 3.0 •6 .1 .001 8.9 .001 4.4 2.6 3,7 2.9 58.1 .001 2.1 2.3 8.7 .001 2,1 .036 Drift Power p Group differences All three different. All three different, 78 129 1,9 2.1 Ftwer RecrN:!,:fiGn Repr,' Pan fo't!o: murvey 39. Percent supportloppose on "drift-only" questions (frequencies and sample sizes). (Percentages in graphs presented in main report). Strongly Slightly Neutral Slightly oppose oppose support In general, more "drift only" days should be added to the Lower River. Bank anglers 12 12 26 Drift anglers 2 4 14 Powerboat anglers 43 13 19 All anglers 16 8 19 Drift guides 8 0 8 14 Power guides 71 2 6 8 In general, more "drift only days should be added to the Middle River. Bank anglers 13 Drift anglers 1 Powerboat anglers 39 All anglers 15 Drift guides 6 Power guides 64 6 Scenic guides 33 0 0 8 2 12 7. 0 24 11 17 16 6 21 23 13 20 20 26 18 22 14 8 If "drift only" days are added, they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available for powerboats). Bank anglers 11 7 29 34 Drift anglers 14 9 21 29 Powerboat anglers 23 5 21 23 All anglers 16 7 24 1. j 29 Drift guides 24 9 35 15 Power guides 53 5 16 13 Straggly support 33 57 12 38 69 13 19 27 28 25 18 14 90 132 84 306 36 101 35 88 59 134 13 82 40 304 74 35 15 99 66 6 89 126 78 293 34 87 ReSea; :and (LonsWting Pagj:i 72, PF:vt, 40. Differences between user and guide groups on number "drift-only" days to add per week (mean comparisons). Percent "'add 1 (in addition to Mon) Percent "add 1 or r Drift Power Bank Drift Power Others Land guides guides Group differences 30 33 72 46 45 21 52 All users=39% 61 53 97 75 71 52 72 All users=63% Percent "add 6'' 13 17 0 17 16 38 16 All users=13'.'/0 (everyday) Mean days to add 2.6 2.8 1.3 2.3 2.3 3.5 2.3 All=2.5 Medan days to add 1.5 2 0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 All=2.0 If you support adding "drift only days, in what months would you prefer them to be added? June 12 27 13 13 19 47 11 All=17% July 19 37 18 19 27 59 16 All=24% August 16 29 8 16 14 53 5 All=17% September 6 25 5 10 7 49 3 All=12% if additional "drift only' days are added per week, which days would you prefer? Tuesday 8 18 5 4 10 34 7 All=10% Wednesday 12 19 3 10 12 36 3 All=12% Thursday 11 15 7 1 12 36 6 All=11% Friday 9 20 4 9 12 28 2 A11=12% Saturday 6 16 3 3 7 36 5 Al1=8% Sunday 7 19 2 4 7 40 6 Al1=9 VD 201i71 Page 29 41. Percent supportioppose more drift-only days (key groups), Note: Among respondents interested in this issue (respondents could opt-out). in general, more "diift only' days should be added tithe Lower River. .1 Sitql3lerneliiiiii:!ii F Strongly Slightly oppose oppose 8 2 43 71 CiLwalen-rx Rese.arch Covv.:F.0.,thing 0 4 13 2 Neutral Drift guides 36 Drift anglers 132 Power anglers 84 Power guides 101 In general, more 'drift only' days should be added to the Middle River. Drift guides 35 Drift anglers 134 2 2 Power anglers 82 39 12 Power guides 99 64 6 If 'drift only days are added they should be on different days on the two segments (so there will always be one segment available for powerboats). Drift guides 34 24 9 35 Drift anglers 126 14 9 21 Power anglers 78 23 5 21 Power guides 87 53 5 16 8 14 19 6 6 11 17 7 Slightly Strongly support support 14 69 24 57 13 12 8 13 14 26 18 8 74 59 13 15 15 29 23 13 14 18 27 28 if additional drift only days are added -will you use them Definitely no Probably not Probably yes Definitely yes if you won't use "drift-only" days why not? n 2 clients prefer power boat prefer powerboat shuttle issues need ramps for trip options physical demands don't have drift boat less flexibility drift can't match success learning required Rorer ,!ijarl: 8 42. Percent of guides who would utilize "drift-only" days if they were implemented. Drift Power n=34 n=91 3 21 3 14 18 21 77 44 32 100 84 72 69 50 41 31 25 3 Additional information about use limit actions 43. Percent of responses to "philosophy of use limits" question among users and landowners. Yes some limits on use are needed Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many permits would be available per day Nat at this •time •maybe •later if crowding gets worse No IU always want unlimited access to the river Reduce use compared to current levels Freeze use near current levels Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use 15 levels) Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) 1 oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase anti 20'm Bank Drift Power Others Land 17 10 11 25 31 17 31 24 33 19 1992 1992 Different drift power groups 12 12 48 28 48 35 40 27 35 40 39 32 56 36 57 33 2 1 3 0 26 44 40 Not asked 33 'Overall differences based on Kruskal chi square, p<.05; group comparisons based on Mann U test, p ‹.05. 2 Not included in percentages for use level limit above in order to compare with 1992 information. Chi-square 34.8, p<.001 Drift from others... Chi-square 23.1, p<.001 when "1 oppose" is included. Drift from others... Chi-square is not significant otherwise. 44. Percent of responses to "philosophy of use limits" question among guides, Yes —some limits on use are needed 17 26 Maybe it depends upon how the permit system works and how many 23 36 permits would be available per day Not at this time maybe later if crowding gets worse No I'll always want unlimited access to the river Reduce use compared to .current levels Freeze use near current levels 43 Allow use to increase slightly (about 10 to 20% compared to current use levels) Allow use to increase substantially (about 50% or more compared to current use levels) I oppose permit systems, even if use and impacts increase K.0 R:tvet Recitgatitm Study tt Re rt Patt. e Add.it:orttM t-Ittp 41 2 rt-2:::iezrch All Drift Power Scenic n=186 n=42 n=135 n=6 24 36 0 11 67 7 19 49 49 3 33 0 33 0 21 43 0 1992 all 39 54 47 lOverall differences based on Kruskal-Wallis chi square, p<.05; group-to-group comparisons based on Mann-Whitney U test, p 05. 2 Not included in percentages for use level limit above in order to compare with 1 902 information. Yes, because information about the number of other boaters would help 7 me plan my trips. 45. Percent responding to "registration program" question. Maybe, but it depends on vithich segment and season it. applies to No, day use parking should not have limits. Yes, day use parking should have some limits. Yes, and different lots should have different knits (depends on the site and its popularity). This issue doesn't mafter to me. 21 Average preferred length (hours) 12.1 Percent 8 hours or less 42 arvis Cemsatim4 All Bank Drift Power users 43 21 8 4 Land- Others owners No, because I'm opposed to 33 30 31 46 44 15 mandatory programs like this. No, because I'm concerned the program could lead to a use limit system (which I oppose), No this will be difficult to enforce. 23 20 21 30 34 22 No, this wili cost too MUCII to 21 21 17 28 29 16 administer. No because this is unnecessary on 14 16 13 12 20 13 the segments I use. Maybe, but it depends on how easy it 14 14 15 14 9 15 is to register, 30 30 26 39 31 16 14 8 14 H. 12 Yes, because this program could lead to a use limit system (which I 9 9 12 5 7 13 support). 6 10 46. Percent responding to "parking limits" question {and average preferred limit length}, All Land- Bank Drift Power Others users owners All Drift Power guides guides guides 42 19 52 37 26 44 25i.1 17 29 21 13 26 15 11 18 9 13 7 •13 30 11 21 7 24 19 15 18 27 12.2 11.7 12.9 10,0 10.5 45 39 36 62 62 All Drift Power guides guides guides 43 23 50 17 18 16 30 12.1 36 15 36 28 12.1 12.2 29 38 Users Lower River... Limit the number of guided boats per day in July Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) in July through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat registration numbers (even numbers on even •dates, odd numbers on odd dates) Typical n Middle River... Require reservations for on-river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on-river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit the number of guides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Typical n Upper River... Require reservations for on-river camping sites Limit the number of unguided boats between Sportsman's and Jim's Landing per day through a reservation system (guided boats are already limited) Typical n 47. Percent supportloppose use limit questions among Tased on Scheffe tests at p<.05. ;A' Ik users and landowners. Land- All Bank Drift Power owners F p Different groups 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.9 4.2 3.8 3,8 4,3 2.5 3.0 2.7 2.1 2.2 10.7 .001 Power from others 2.5 311 108 71 132 70 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.1 :39 35 3.7 3.5 3.9 3.7 4.0 1.6 1.5 4.1 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 2,2 401 150 132 119 78 3.2 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.6 2.7 5.1 .006 Power-bank 473 191 203 79 .115 37% of entire sample. 5.2 .001 Power from others 47% of entire sample. 56% of entire sample. C3:1:riiluente 2(310 Kenai River Recreation Strtdy SupplaiiKtntal '‘'tepoirt Part 8 Additional: TotiNtriarup slyrsrvey results 48. Percent support/oppose use limit questions among guides. All Drift Lower River... Limit the number of guided boats per day in July 1.7 Limit the number of guides fin general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) in July through a reservation system Limit all powerboat use in the Lower River in July by boat registration numbers (even numbers on 1,5 even dates, odd numbers on odd dates) Typical n Middle River.. Require reservations for on-river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Three day limit for on-river campsites between Skilak Lake and Kenai Keys Limit the number of guided boats per day Limit tbe number of guides (in general) Limit the number of all boats (guided or unguided) through a reservation system Typical n Upper River... •Require reservations for on-river camping sites Limit the number of unguided boats between Sportsman's and Jim's Landing per day through a reservation system (guided boats are already limited) Typical n 71 35 31 'Based on Scheffe tests at p<.05. 2.4 1.9 2.4 2.5 17 Power 1.6 2.4 1.8 125 t 2.5 p .015 2.6 3.3 2.3 3.3 .001 3.1 4.1 2.8 4.4 .001 1,7 2.1 1.5 2.7 .007 •1.9 2.3 1.7 2.4 .019 1.8 2.5 1.5 4.1 .001 123 31 90 3,3 3.5 2.8 2.0 .050 3.8 4.2 3.3 2.5 .014 Gonintierice: Research _and Con8i:,:q1 711ct-cber age 36 49. Percent answering "Lower River capacity" questions and percent responding among users and guides. n On high use days in July... Median Mean Percent 400 or less On other days Im July.., Median Mean Percent 400 or less In July... Median Mean Percent 150 or less In other months... Median Mean Percent 150 or less Kenai! R,',34.3.2r Study Supplementa1 Rc Nit 3 333ovv-up: st3rvey rtki, faccafrararace Research and .rr'aanziiretrag rr.:1 2010 Users Guides Boat Guide boat Boat Guide boat capacity capacity capacity capacity 355 355 145 122 Percent answering questions 42 42 67 56 Of those answering, percent checking one response (vs. many) 87 89 49 38 No.1 object to defining a 'capacity for guided boats not asked 12 not asked 46 No, it depends on how the boats are distributed 23 16 27 25 No I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which I oppose 26 12 39 34 No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me 8 7 23 25 No the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish 5 5 6 6 No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this 31 33 23 18 No its too complicated 10 9 15 10 Yes (please provide your estimates below) 18 27 22 16 n=65 300 278 88 n=-62 250 243 89 m 100 130 80 n=32 400 412 78 n=27 300 385 78 •n=22 150 209 55 n=97 n=21 100 150 135 176 83 67 RIc:read•iri E St,pplernentr ifiepoql 1i: 8 50. Percent answering "Lower River capacity" questions and percent responding among users and guides. Percent answering questions Of those answering, percent checking one response (vs. many) No, it depends on how the boats are distributed No I'm concerned estimates will be used to limit boats, which 1 oppose No, the number of boats doesn't matter to me No the number of boats doesn't matter to me as long as I'm catching fish No, I care about the number of boats, but I don't know how to estimate this No it's too complicated Yes (please provide your estimates below) During red salmon runs... Median Mean Percent 150 or less During other times... Median Mean Percent 150 or less (Users) Boat capacity 496 (Guides) Boat capacity 68 58% 31% 87 25% 22 20 21 18 10 12 7 4 36 21 7 15 18 46 n=90 n-=31 150 100 157 106 61 97 n=89 n=30 141 75 150 86 79 97 P:.:1cpi 28 Additional information about guided /unguided use issues, 51, Group comparisons for attitudes toward guide/unguided issues among users and landowners. Users The total number of guided boats can detract from experiences. Some guides tend to be "more aggressive" (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). Aside from other issues, some people are envious that guided users catch more fish. Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat equipment to fish in higher density areas. Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. No one group is the problem, everyone needs to share the burden of reducing .impacts. The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to the group that is causing the impacts. Limiting guided :use :is.a good way to reduce overall use. Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. 'Based on Scheffe tests at p <.05. All Bank Drift Power Land users owners 1= p Different groups 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.9 4,4 Landowners ttigh 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.9 Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such 3.6 3.5 3.7 3,7 3.7 as drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa). Some unguided users don't know the 'rules" for driving on the o a create safety hazards, 4.0 .019 Power bank andowners hi 4.1 4,1 4.1 4.3 4.6 Landowners high. 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.1 4.1 4.0 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 1.9 Landowners low. The total number of guided bo detract from experiences. Some guides tend to be more aggressive" (such as getting too close to others, controlling a hole, or cutting in front of other boats waiting to enter a drift). 52. Group comparisons for attitudes toward guide/unguided issues between among users (mean scores). All users Never Some- use times use guide guide 4.2 4.4 4.0 3.0 2.8 3.2 3,5 12.2 .001 "Never" from others Aside: from other issues, some people are envious that guided users catch more fish. Problems with guided use are mostly due to a few individual guides. Some unguided users do not have the appropriate boat equipment to fish in higher density areas. Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as drifting when others are backtroiling or vice versa). Some unguided users don't know the "rules" for driving on the river. and create safety hazards. Problems with unguided users are mostly due to a few individuals. No one group is the problem, everyone needs to share the burden of reducing impacts. Limiting guided use is a good way to reduce overall use: Local economic benefits from guided use are more important than overuse issues. 'Based on Schefe tests at p <.05. RE Cot 4.0 3.8 4.2 3.6 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.0 4.1 The burden of reducing impacts should be proportional to the group 4.0 4.0 4.1 that is causing the impacts. 2.4 2.1 2.9 Frequently use guide 3.5 30.9 .001 F p Different groups All three 4.3 9.9 .001 "Never" from others 4.0 5.0 .007 "Never" from frequently' 3.9 3.8 4.2 5.3 .005 °'f=requently" from others 4.2 4.0 3.1 36.3 .001 "Never" from others Introduction Crowding and impacts Fishery issues Recreation development or facilities Regulation education Use limits Drift -only or other conflicts This section of the supplemental report provides verbatim comments made on the on -site surveys, organized by type of group (bank anglers, drift anglers, powerboat anglers, and non anglers) and topic. Major topic categories include: Bank Anglers Crowding and impacts Something needs to be done with crowds at Russian River limitations Doesn't mind getting tangled up if people are reasonable July is intolerable Being crowded doesn't matter if people know what they are doing Will stay until he catches one, when crowded he comes to visit friends Goes to private property when public sites are crowded Never dissatisfied when fishing, but need more fish in the river and more restrictions on commercial fishermen. Will not fish if he cannot find a not so crowded place to fish. We love being here. No fish in river, so crowding is not too bad He goes fishing early to avoid the crowds Tangled lines with friends, didn't matter Excellent campground, king fishing not crowded, red fishing is, Not to busy in the king fishing area. even if it was crowded we would try to work our way in, we did have our lines cut by a power boat, handicap facilities are dangerous, cut the brush away Some stole his roe, need bigger fishing areas for more people Couldn't fish water high had to wait for same place to fish 1 aggressive guide, people are rude when it is crowded No local parking, tourists are causing the problems Extremely crowded at Centennial Need less people, more fish. Need recycle bins for line, cans etc, More trash cans. Did come across one rude person, was fishing about 5 feet apart today, fishing in a ramp area, expect to move for boat I do mind getting tangled if I have a fish on Lots of litter, people behave for the most part, need new cleaning tables Need more room to fish, more problems with Germans being so uncourteous, there's always somebody causing problems Do something to take the pressure off the Kenai River. Need more law enforcement and public safety enforcement, adults were cutting my kids lines, even if it is crowded, we will try to work in. If it's too crowded I won't fish Don't know where to find an uncrowded place to fish Water height made fishing difficult, crowding depends on the time of day Will wait for place to fish if it's crowded, don't' mind combat fishing if people are polite Need litter cleanup and places for fishing line etc, need cleaning tables, if it is crowded I will keep looking for an uncrowded place to fish Too much line litter Raining today, lower angler usage I will wait until someone leaves the fishery to get a place to fish It is always especially crowded at Rotary Park. I wait until I can get an open spot. I expect it to be crowded this time of year. The river is well managed the way it is, don't change anything I expect to get tangled when it is crowded. Boats are not an issue in this park, clean up log debris from Rapids hole area If I get tangled too often I will ask them to give me more room Will fish closer, just depends on the crowd Use was too high during sockeye season, this year it was hard to find a place to fish because of the high water, it is expected to get lines tangled during the sockeye season It was hard to find a place to fish on the weekends at Swiftwater Park. High water is washing away the banks I expect to get tangled up when it is crowded 1 will come fishing when it is crowded and wait until someone leaves to get a spot. Boat wakes are a problem at the KRC. My boots have been overtopped by boat wakes before Most of the boat interference is in the Lower River I go where there aren't people to avoid the crowd, Getting lines tangled is part of fishing Everything is about right at this moment. If it gets too crowded I wilf leave and go somewhere else When the tourists go home it is quieter, don't like the misuse and abuse of snagged fish, 1 just deal with it being crowded when l want to fish, boat wakes interfere all the time, bank anglers are always getting waked by boats Someone stepped into my fishing spot Use is too high because we need more access, have had problems with other anglers earlier in the year, have not gotten tangled up or had boats interfere today. Experienced other anglers causing problems at other times, the one who is a problem today has left, I have gotten tangled with the same person again today, fix the signs at the centennial boat launch no fishing area so they say the same thing. Getting tangled up always matters I don't fish on weekends here because it is crowded then No problem getting tangled up as long as they can speak English Wi11 fish closer if fishing with friends Getting tangled can be annoying, boat wakes can interfere, but not today If I get repeatedly tangled up with other anglers it does bother me, No problem with boat wakes here at Centennial, would be more satisfied if it wasn't raining or there were more fish Motor homes should not be allowed to monopolize the bank fishing area along the river. It should be day use only, not camping. Not satisfied with the fishing, getting tangled doesn't matter but it does depend on how and why Don't mind getting tangled up on the Kenai, people courteous Someone needs to be on site to keep an eye on the handicapped fishing area, getting tangled can bother me, just depends on the number of times, boats do bother me if they come in at full throttle When it is crowded I will wait until a spot opens up, Boat wakes can be aggravating at change out or at the end of the day (guides) The motor homes should not be able to camp in the bank fishing area, they put out their pole holders without a fishing pole to save themselves a place and prevent others from fishing. If it is too crowded here, Igo somewhere else The people here are wonderful, More enforcement needed at swift water, people are walking all over the banks. Boat wakes are not a problem when we don't have to stand in the water to fish. If it is crowded, we wait for a place Don't care how crowded, it doesn't matter, will wait for an opening Is not crowded now, but couldn't find spot this morning. If a place is crowded, I will wait for a spot Would be more satisfied with more fish, too many guides, won't fish if I think it is too crowded. Took boat to go to bank fishing spot, If it is busy, I will wait until I can get in Maybe less people would make me happy, don't like it but 1 will combat fish, if it is busy, I will wait until 1 can get in, Charter Boat and ADF&G came into the harbor, they were very courteous. I came early when it wasn't crowded, entanglements do bother me when it is over and over again Need more places to fish with our motor homes, not many places to go where it is not crowded Getting tangled up does bother me if it is my fault I was not crowded because 1 came early, I prefer being at least a car length from other anglers More boats anchored at Eagle Rock than expected, we have a boat so if the bank is crowded we will fish from the boat, we are from the USSR and think the locals know more about the issues that we do Getting tangled up doesn't bother me unless it is persistent If it is crowded, I will wait to fish Experience would be better with more fish, lots of illegal gear, good to see DNR here enforcing rules, wouldn't fish if it was crowded, I would get upset if boats continually interfered Fishery issues Was catching hooligan. Very happy to have hooligan Always very satisfied when fishing Fishing regulations change too much Group has released some trout Dissatisfied because there are no fish Things would be better if there were more fish Ran into a belligerent boater at Big Eddy a few days ago, would be happier if there were more fish River too high, shoreline limited need more fish Dissatisfied because there are no fish Recreation development or facilities Worst public toilets are in Centennial Park, Have camped in many "dry" sites in the lower 48 and the toilets are much more sanitary and cleaner Need more day use fishing access, too expensive to get into campgrounds Send survey in September. Not satisfied because there are areas closed to fishing along the river banks. FIX FUNNY RIVER REC SITE!!! No boat launch at Cunningham. The park is beautiful as it is Anglers fishing techniques need improvement, toilets need to be pumped more often Pump toilets more often, need more picnic tables at Rotary Park Send survey in Sept, fish cleaning tables are at bad locations at Swiftwater Dissatisfied with the decks being so high and the brush underneath them, it makes less fishable area No more boardwalking at Rapids hole it will screw up the fishing improve facilities, dean up toilets Fix walkways by lowering them and remove all the brush underneath them. Will wait for spot when the fishery is crowded. Why was the horsepower raised to 5o hp. Filled out a survey for Dan. More river access needed There is too much fishing line left on the banks, it needs to be cleaned up Cunningham Park needs fish cleaning tables, caught fish there and came to Centennial to clean them The handicap area sign is worded incorrectly I did not have a problem finding a place to fish because I got here early today Dogs have been causing problems, park should provide rod holders for people to use, i am brand new in this fishery I am proxy fishing, some people are courteous, bathrooms should be closer to the fishing areas Need more access below Skilak Repair the walkways in the hcp fishing area. No stairs from the walkways to the water, ice damage needs to be repaired Repair ice damaged ELP's at Swiftwater, public hazard, less fishing area Was cleaning fish caught on the Kasilof. Complained about no fish cleaning tables on the Kasilof. Wondered why Soldotna invites fisher men here and has so much bank closed off. Regulation l education There should be a no wake zone in front of the bank fishing /boat launch area at Centennial Fishing from walkway access stairway up river of launch, boats pass to close to bank fishermen, Too many boat passes unsafe Dipnetter. Is comfortable if other boats are a boat length away Post and enforce speed limits at Swiftwater install speed bumps Notes about survey or "refusals" from survey technician My partner filled out a survey at Russian River earlier Fishing on island downstream of Rotary Park From Russian Mission AK Group of 10 folks from France From Russian Mission Al< Hasn /t fished yet, wants to get email survey Had been bank fishing earlier, picking up friends at pillars in vehicle Already in data base First day fishing, new to fishery don't know much about it Had to wait for spot to fish, new to fishery Already have address from earlier interview New to area; doesn't feel qualified. All of the fishermen in the group are on the river Wife filled it out yesterday Needed to find the rest of his fishing group On his way to the restroom Too tired, taking a break Moving to a different place to fish Just leaving; not interested Can't talk and fish at the same time Just started fishing Doesn't speak English Son just arrived from Vegas, needs to leave Headed to restroom Late for dinner From Bavaria, doesn't speak English Doesn't speak English well enough Needs to pack up to go back to anch Fishing stinks today, don't answer questions I don't need to Don' t want to do survey Just started fishing Just started fishing Too tired from walk from fishing area Refused wants email survey only Am leaving to get to work Filled one out last night for the young man, just starting fishing today From Fairbanks, filled out survey last night, don't want to do it again Too tired His partners are doing the survey Two women Not fishing "just holding rods" Just coming back to the fishery, haven't fished in five years, don't know what the norms are Just starting to fish I'm a compulsive liar Someone it their group did one Friday No time Would rather not be bothered en a Had fish at cleaning table, does not speak English Did a survey last week Did one last week German, don't speak English Has done two surveys at different locations Pole broken, pulled into river by king salmon, no survey today Going home for dinner Did one last week Late, need to leave Did 2 weeks ago Car in upper parking area need to pack and leave Not interested Did a survey fast week Has already done a survey Just started fishing Did one this season already Refused already surveyed at Cunningham Park German nationals not fluent in English Drift anglers Crowding and impacts Sockeye beaches crowded Lots of boats Lots of litter Really crowded today If it is crowded I will go somewhere else Launched from a private launch, take fifty percent of the powerboats off the river Powerboats moved for us Power boats were coming too close A boater hooked a fish and moved over (out of our drift) to land the fish The clear creek [Russian] was very crowded and it was as aggravating as hell Need to start shuttle service Education /regulation Only complaint is drift boats anchoring in the fishing holes. I was being courteous. other boats were coming too close, not using nets on fish, had to change course all the time because boats would cut in front of me Powerboats motor by too close Drift-only issues Dissatisfied because fishing is lousy, will not fish on powerboat days, would prefer to have drift boat days on the days commercial fishermen don't fish Launched drift boat at Pillars and put motor in chase vehicle and left it at Cunningham. Landed at Cunningham, put motor on and headed to Kenai city dock for takeout. Provide equal opportunity (days) for drift boats. Mare boats this Monday than last Monday. Surprised at good etiquette and there was less anchoring in holes this Monday. More float days!!! There should be no powerboats allowed on Monday; 3 kings hooked between graveyard and Pillars Amazed there are so many options for power boats, drift boats, PU fishing, habitat protection closures etc. Retired area manager for ADF &G. Saw one rude group that would not cut their lines and a kid lost his fish because of it. Too many power boats on Monday. Drift boats only on Monday Too many power boats. Only fish drift boat Mondays in July Boats were anchoring at the top of the drift, one of them was a guide, more motor boats than expected Boats were all grouped up at outlet of Skiiak, don't allow powerboats on the Kenai The experience was really good, too many power boat wakes High number of powerboats, weaving in and out of the drift boats, boat wakes bad, power boats cutting off Miscellaneous The day was perfect, caught one king and released one trout Very nice people on river Too much wind, had to leave canoes at Skilak outlet and walk back to landing Put in on Brook Trout street easement I was cold Other information from survey technician Contacted at Bings in a powerboat earlier this month Powerboat Anglers Crowding and impacts 2 boats, 2 adults, 5 kids Three canoes, 2 adults, 4 kids Kayak party of two non fishing Now to river, don't know what they will tolerate yet, Already have address big eddy easement New to river don't know what his tolerances would be yet 1st experience on river don't know anything about river, boat was already in the river when I arrived, no one was here when we took out no wait at all First time fishing on the river don't know issues and what is normal, no one was in the way on the river New to area, hard to rate crowding Use level doesn't matter to him. On fun trip with guide friend Launched at Kenai city dock and went out to salt water. Took out at Pillars because low tide made the Kenai dock inaccessible. Crowding does not matter if everyone is courteous. Fished for trout today. Prefer to fish on guide days, more order on river. Crowding on river is not a problem if people know what they are doing. No "goonery Fishing was what he expected, use was about normal, no uncroweded place to fish in July. has annual boat launch pass, does not need to wait to pay fees Was fishing at sunken island, would be more satisfied if there were more fish, need more boat ramps and less guides Limit guides, would be better satisfaction if it was sunny, too many boats blocking the dock and they don't move up to make room for other boats Slightly dissatisfied because there are no fish, if the river is crowded he won't go fish Need less guides an the river. Resident guides only Dip netters, wrote in "guides" under how often did boats interfere field Guides are making the fishery hectic, launches are crowded, challenging to get access to the river His friend stood in a parking place while they launched the boat and was accosted two times by angry park users that wanted their parking place They had to drive around a lot to find a place to fish Too many guides, like no guide Sunday rule Met friend at ramp, boat already in river. Very courteous boaters Very crowded at big eddy, Guide already had boat launched, didn't need to wait. King season is always crowded Sockeye beaches are crowded because of high water, will wait for opening if crowded Met guide at poachers easement Guide on personal trip with friends One boat powered up river between boats and waked everyone that was fishing, our guide helped a boat that had lost power A boat ran through the area we were fishing in at high speed A rude guide came too close to their lines Guide boats using fish cleaning tables often block the ramp; Several boats helped a vessel that couldn't be restarted because the key broke in the ignition Guide on personal trip. If other boats are interfering, he will move. Waiting at launches seems intolerable in July. He comes early when he knows it will be crowded First trip in 10 years on Kenai River, don't know enough about fishery to tell what he would tolerate. Won't fish when it is crowded, boat wakes are a problem for bank fishermen and the banks. Should be drift fishing only. There are too many guides out on the river, we only went king fishing once this year Limit the number of guides Usually don't have trouble finding a place to fish except during red season. It is a problem then First time on the river, don't know how it works, guide was in the water waiting for use so there was not wait to launch Boats don't interfere, but the holes fill up quickly, so I launch early. The host manning the gate at the Pillars and no room to launch is a problem Igo to Centennial instead. If my favorite spots to fish are full, I wait until they open up Guide boats waking everyone, near accident was log floating down river on anchored boat. Boat was able to pull anchor and move, Guides are taking up spots. I was pulling my anchor to move down to an open spot and a guide cut in front of me and took the spot. But I would rather fish with guides any day than the public. Interference -most often guides in lower river, I stay in lake outlet area to avoid crowded areas below. Was not crowded at all, new to this part (Middle River) hard to answer questions about tolerances Boat traffic is high today Guide boat hogged the ramp when he cleans his clients fish, always have trouble finding a place to fish during weekends in July. Boats didn't interfere with my ability to fish this year It was crowded in the morning, our guide was courteous to other boaters There was a person on the bank yelling at us to move away from the banks 1 am from Louisiana, boats passing too fast, boat waking is bad. I would be shot if I waked property or camps like the guides do, especially during high water. Guide was already in the water when we got here, no launch wait. I don't catch and release silvers because of the mortality rate, have never had a crowded experience during silver fishing, can't answer the tolerance questions Crowded nearly all the time during king season, not at silver season. I am concerned about having more parking at the Pillars. Would be more satisfied if the fishing were better, a boat got too close today, the river is the most crowded when fishing for kings, and I always have trouble finding and uncrowded place to fish then too. More fish would make the experience better, it is always crowded during king season Quit fishing the Kenai in July 20 years ago because of combat fishing. Soldotna does a good job; Kenai does not have any camping facilities A trio of guides kept dropping in below me and getting too close, didn't really interfere, but too close, boats always interfere during July Too many guides during king season, need more parking places at the Pillars, have trouble finding a place to fish all the time in July, would have been more satisfied if there were more fish. Have lived her for 20 years and haven't fished in 20 years, Pillars too hard to get parking space, Centennial too far to boat to lower river, eagle rock is too expensive. But recreation experience today was beautiful. [Low use day] I don't fish in July, we should have local guides only There was a 4o' space between our boat and the next boat, other boats kept cutting in between us. Fished lower river in the morning. Crowded. A boat interfered by anchoring within casting distance of our boat. It is hard to find an uncrowded place in July Boats travelling to 'hot" in first hole, big wakes, would not want to see more people than there already are out there today, guide took care of the launch If it's too busy here I go to Moose river Guide ran boat so we didn't pay attention to boat interference. Don't know what crowded here is. My line tangled in someone else's motor Crowding and interference ratings were for downriver portion of the day since most time was spent there Can't have too many launches or parking lots, had no trouble finding a spot today, but in July everything is crowded all the time Fished by the Kenai keys, it was crowded, guides not respecting other boaters by giving them space, suggest extending no guide fishing for another two days a week, guide boats show no etiquette or respect. Some interference with boats, upper end of river more crowded, send survey to partner at his email too Quit fishing kings in the lower river in 1988, quit fishing silvers in lower river in 1992, quit fishing lower river altogether in 1998 because of guides and crowds, 1 fished around the keys today, my trip was a 5, but fishing was a 3. 40 percent of the time we had trouble finding an uncrowded place, boats were anchored on top of us, Sundays are ridiculous because of boat numbers, no rest for the fish. Boats don't interfere during silver season, the 5 is for king season, not crowded during silver season the 5 is for king season. Problems with parking at the Pillars I expect interference and crowding Interference and crowding worst during king season, last weekend of July the worst, guides need their own launch Used to fish more, before guides turned sportfishing into a business, surprised to see how many fishermen are here, refuse to fish earlier in year because of crowding. Fishing could be better, something has to happen to protect the fishery, boats backtroil through the Pillars launch in July, boat interference is bad in July combat fishing by boat in July, I don't go if it is crowded in July It was not too crowded today, in July it is different Fishing places are always crowded in July, reduce guides by 112 Boats interference is a July experience, I go fishing early to avoid crowds, when it get crowded I will move and go somewhere else Most crowded at Thompson's hole, left side, like lower river, red salmon no fishing areas should be open, always so crowded, need more parking at bings for cars Gave up fishing for kings, it is always crowded and difficult to find a place to fish in July If it is crowded we will move Beautiful weather, fishing about a "2 crowding is the worst I have seen Not crowded at all compared to king fishing, longest waits at launch are during king season Don't fish in July because of the interference and crowding Much better than king season, won't come during king season, it's disgusting If it is crowded, I just go somewhere else Use is too high every day, powerboats come too close Not crowded compared to yesterday, boats kept shadowing us (hooked fish other boats came to where they were fishing) if it is crowded, it is more challenging to find a place to fish No trouble finding an uncrowded place today, July is a different story. I will wait as long as it takes to launch Fishing use was perfect, guide knows the river, found uncrowded places Would not go if it was crowded, will wait 30 minutes for launch if not crowded More boats than we anticipated Boat interference is nothing like king season I would tolerate interference more than rarely or never but less than 25 percent, Guide already had the boat in the water The use wasn't high, but it was a little higher than about right Use was a little high People were anchoring in holes, if it is crowded I go to other places to fish Use was a little high This part of the river is not crowded until the fall, more guides all the time. I used to fish kings on the Kenai, now I am fishing the salt for them, had an issue with a guide at the ramp today Fishery issues Disappointed because the sockeye fishery was so poor this year Very satisfied, but fishing could have been better, saw fishing violations The fishing sucks, never seen fewer boats, had trouble finding other boats Would be better with more fish. Fishing could be better Experience would have been better with fish Fishing was terrible Dissatisfied because there are no fish Dissatisfied because there are no fish. Fix ramp and dredge hump away Only dissatisfied because they did not catch a fish. Can't decide how dissatisfied he is, would rather keep more small fish than be forced to kill 2 big fish(kings). He had a guide pull in his clients lines to get clear of a fish running downstream Development! facilities Education Regulation Other comments Need one more launch on the Spur Highway side of the river downstream of Pillars, need separate lot for cars, need another boat launch on the Kbeach side too. Very little traffic on the river today Improve Moose River access, separate car parking and boat trailer parking area at Bings and Moose River State boat launch sticker should apply at the Pillars. I have already done this [survey] once last week. More access to the river like the Pillars is needed, nice facility right price, I will not king fish next year too many guides telling me what to do Ranger has been instructing people to park in the empty campground spaces, it's so crowded. We did find a quiet place to fish, fix potholes and washboard in road, car parking lot needed Not enough parking 99 percent of the people are courteous, need more parking for vehicles Had to shut down power and take evasive action to avoid collision Regulations too complicated Fix access road (Pillars). Enforce the 15 minute rule at the floating dock. Guides are staying longer than that Boater education for private boat operators. Almost hit twice by boats travelling around Stewarts Landing area (Big Eddy bend) From Holland and has cabin in the keys, first fishing trip to lower river, everyone needs a boat operator license in eur. Should to that here too. Does not think you should be able to bait fish for trout Boats interfered once by coming between us and the shore. We were casting toward shore. Guides are making wakes and passing improperly, they don't have running lights either. Guide interference happens all the time Boats travel too fast and make large wakes Have lived here for 10 years but only fished 7 times, more wake control is needed, I drive here from anchorage so I will fish no matter what. No fish nothing applies Checked no thanks but gave address Guide on fun fishing trip Fishes for king salmon only 2 kings in party 3 kings in boat 1 king in boat 2 kings in boat Left lower river to move to upper river for trout fishing Hard to answer 16 -17 don't know enough about river Politely refused to finish survey, guide in hurry to move group to middle river. Very pleased with trip so far, 1 fish in group of 5 Guides interfered with his ability to fish, normally it is hard to find an uncrowded place to fish nearly ail the time. Get rid of at least half of the out of state guides. Limit guides Caught jacks today. Guides, especially out of state guides are a problem Fished at honeymoon cove. Wrote "nice boating experience- 1prop" Lives on river, leaves boat moored in front of residence. Dipnetting for sockeye Dipnetter, lots of fish to clean Reasons for refusing to take survey Dipnetting for sockeye in addition to fishing for kings Needs to get back to anchorage Dipnetter, guides need to go back to 40hp Dipnetter, the Pillars needs separate parking for cars and boat trailers Dipnetter Dipnetting, too many guides during king season Dipnetter Don't raise the launch fees because the neighbors do and we need separate areas for parking for boat trailers and cars Waited and launched in the afternoon, less boats makes it more pleasant, dipnetter, drinking should not be allowed on the river Put new dock in at a slant New angler not sure of what he would tolerate or what is a long wait for the ramp Dipnetting, this was a drift boat Monday so the survey will be different on some Mondays, no motorboats is a rare day Dipnetting, Dipnetter Dipnetter No wait because the guide was in the water when I got here Boat was launched two months and kept in the river Not fishing today, spent weekend at cabin on Caribou Island, not much fishing in the past five years Fished upper Killey area Pulled swamped canoe out of river Use level was perfect I love my guide I stay at a place where we keep the boat in the water Guide already had the boat in the water Our boat was already in the river Put in double wide ramp (Bing's) Guide and family on personal trip Friend of guide on private trip We also dipnet Politely refused on way to work In hurry to leave town will do another day Not interested in survey, guide volunteered fishing info Filled out one last week In hurry to pick up family members In hurry to get to processor and airport Guided client, no fish, in hurry to get to lodge, will do survey next time Dropped off by boat operator needed restroom break In hurry to get to airport Not recreating, just testing engine In hurry to get to anchorage Not interested in hurry to leave Needs to get back to anchorage In hurry wanted to avoid Russian river traffic In hurry, filled one out in June, will do another later this month Ready to leave Ready to leave, will fill one out next time Gave fish info because he thought 1 was creel, needed to get to airport Too tired Driving transportation van for guided clients. Need to leave now. In hurry to leave Don't want to be bothered All info supplied by others in boat until operator refused and said he had already done a survey in June Didn't catch any fish don't want to do survey Late for dinner wife is mad Not interested in survey 65 year Alaskan, doesn't want to answer any questions he doesn't have to Ready to leave Dipnetter, don't have time to fill out the survey Need to clean boat and leave Leaving to go get gas Did a survey a few days ago Don't have time Ride is leaving Carne down river from cabin, no fishing today Taking boat out for season Has done survey before Late needs to leave Did a survey earlier Nat fishing, just came down from cabin, headed back to anch Had to leave Did survey last week Was surveyed last week Six fish caught for group, already filled out survey, not interested in another, appreciates our efforts Don't want to be part of the survey 1 filled one out yesterday Need to leave Did one last week Did survey once before, already have my name and address I use a guide and don't know, guide takes care of everything Guide took care of launching and finding the fishing area Defer to guide on 16 -18, 1 don't know I don't know about launch or interfering, new to river From Idaho, don't know this river Guide was already in the water when I got here, my first time on the Kenai don't know anything about river, guide handled everything Don't know the system first time on the river Is new to fishing the Kenai, don't know area German tourist with translator, no experience on river to judge tolerances or waiting at ramp Chinese tourists, first time on river Late for dinner Have already been interviewed twice. Have already done the survey, don't have time, state employee parked in hcp zone this morning Already took survey Did survey in June, just got secondary survey Did survey in may Filled out survey last week not again Need to leave to shuttle vehicle Mad at parks. They refused to let him launch his boat with more that 5 people in it, 2 families drove from Anchorage to fish from one boat. Party of 8 Was out on river today, did not fish, taking boat out to wash and clean up Interviewed yesterday O Done the survey already Had one fish hooked and it was propped off e 1 person in party hooked and lost fish Non-anglers E4,110,0;;qAt!9110,.0e0.0tlf R.'„eport Part %iieftatir.3 trorn Camping problem: dogs barking Bluff fence above fishing area needs repair it is unsafe No TP in restroom Too many drunks in campground Introduction This section of the supplemental report provides verbatim comments made on the user follow -up surveys, organized by question or topic. A "table of contents" by topic is provided below: introduction 1 Other trips people report taking,..., 2 Other comments related to "how frequently do you use guided services 2 Other types of boats people may use 3 Other issues considered important 3 Fishery condition, fishing regulations, and fishing regulation enforcement 3 Guide /non -guide 5 Facility needs/ evaluations 5 Boating regulations and safety 6 General crowding competition or concerns about development 6 Litter and human waste 7 Bears or bear regulations 7 More access 7 Subsistence /personal use 7 Drift only 9 Fees 9 Discourteous behavior 9 Handicapped and access for children 9 Long responses...many issues 9 Other 10 Other rivers they go to (when they feel crowded on the Kenai)? 11 Other reasons for reducing or stopped fishing on the Kenai? 12 Other specific management actions for the entire river 13 Other comments about use limits or the mandatory registration system concept 17 Other comments about drift only issues 18 Other comments about guide /non -guide issues 21 Other comments about private development or visual impacts of development 27 Other comments about Lower River actions 29 Other recorrimended I ewer River heat capacities 30 Other comments about Middle River actions 30 Other comments about Upper River actions 30 Additional general comments 32 Other trips people report taking... Never, we are getting our own boat My own raft I am a commercial scenic guide That trip was my first Own drift boat Fly in trip to Wolverine Creek Have our own boat Russian river ferry Bank fishing without guide Own my raft so don't need a guide. Used a guide on my one trip to Alaska Recreahm F rb 11 .tee m Part of this is I cannot afford a boat Upper river area of the Russian river ferry crossing to include the entire fly fishing only area Just walking and taking pictures Skilak campground Traveling in A RV and camping by river Wildlife Photography... Including people Camping middle river Middle River scenic power boating Bear viewing near the mouth of the Russian River My cabin is only accessible from the river (middle) First time fishing on the River Upper river litter pick -up N/a this was a once in a life trip; probably to never return Scenic floating near Princess lodge Confluence of Russian River Bank Fishing Was a one -time trip Motel Kayaking at Bings Landing Camped for years, now own property on Funny River road Tourist, upper river bank fishing, drift boat fishing, and scenic floating, single year Camping at Kenai Lake that may be outside your study area Camping on the river not at campground This was my first trip on the Kenai River, This was a first time trip for us and we aren't sure about a return trip 1 do not fish Kenai Russian fishing Fishing from a deck because easier with children like Morgan Landing Only used Kenai once for fishing Recreational power boating in middle Kenai Camping on upper river islands Russian /Kenai confluence (on the Kenai) RV park Russian River Avoiding crowds Hiking along the river Russian River, Deep Creek Other comments related to "how frequently do you use guided services Motor home no guide Raft with friends; have my own raft next year Went fishing with a guide once Fish processing facility Fish with residents /friends in Soldotna Fishing guide without a boat (walk in) Fishing out of a friends boat Fishing tackle Fishing with friends who are guides Food services cafe, coffee, sandwiches Friend with boat Have own boats Hiking and boating on Skilak Lake I have self a boot I have yet to do the most important on my list My boyfriend Nla I was only here for the one time Never have but want to in the future Once a year Our trip was the once in a lifetime trip with guided trips, 4 x Own boat Renting a vehicle. RV Self This was our first time on the Kenai so the "frequency' piece isn't very applicable. 2 x Went with friends who had a boat Other types of boats people may use... John Boat Boat owned by guide Resident Powerboat only occasionally with friends have a round raft, not a cat that I will use next year Pack raft Pontoon Russian River Ferry Use most often fishcat and powerboat checked Zodiac and cataraft with a motor Other issues considered important... Issues: Fishery condition, fishing regulations, and fishing regulation enforcement Emergency orders my ass -we won't be coming back! Review the "acceptable" run numbers of salmon escapement counts at the weirs. Lower commercial fishing counts... There should report all fish coming back on the ferry. Spawning rainbows being caught in the middle river in the spring Why do people have to bring rainbow trout into the boat and let flop on the floor before releasing? Come on fish game, step up and introduce some common sense laws about the proper handling of trout. Need better posting of area and rules Understandable regulations for boating and fishing. Regulations on separate parts of the river that make it impossible to know the rules! Lack of fish wildlife officers enforcing existing regulations Separate areas for bank king fishing in Centennial Park during July, red fisherman take over river in July and bank king fishing is virtually impossible. Too much regulation on fishery and the River! Too many fish and game, troopers, and other officiating officers. They hassle you constantly. Poaching of Rainbow Trout/Doily Varden it happens daily...And F &G does nothing about it! Presence of rainbow trout (this seem lees in 2009 than in other years... Preservation of fishery Not enough enforcement on river -see lots of things happening but nothing done! lam concerned about keeping the fish runs healthy for the future. Regulations should protect the fish runs Change regulations for Trout, dollie, and Char to Fly Fishing only with barbless hooks. These fish are taking a beating. Fish Wildlife officers motoring to close to bank anglers Anglers not obeying existing regulations Illegal behavior by users, i,e. Snagging, over limits Miss- handling of fish Poaching 1st, and2nd run reds daily and F7G does nothing about it! Why is there a catch release bait fishery? Shrimp for rainbows in the middle? If you are using shrimp for rainbows dollies in August September, when the regulation was designed for Coho fishing, your are out of the game anyway and should not be on the water. Besides, I limit out on Coho every time I try and use only #4 vibrax in various colors, Using eggs& sardine wrapped plugs in the middle river, Skiiak to Bings is just not necessary and allows un- ethical anglers to use a "loop hole" and fish shrimp for trout, catch release with bait, that makes zero sense, the mortality rate is the highest with bait caught fish, where did I hear that Oh yeah, I remember, it was a fish and game seminar. Step up and protect the resource, And don't expect a bunch of trout fisherman to be able to take 2 weeks off from work and go down to Soldotna and attend meetings, just do the right thing and change the rags!! I am a believer in catch and release using barbless hooks. it is a privilege to be able to fish Alaska, especially the Kenai River system My second concern is the regulations, I am not for snagging, however many hundreds and no doubt thousands of fish are lost each year because after being foul hooked they are returned to the river to die and be wasted. My observation is that most that die are hooked somewhere in the head, i.e. The gills etc. My suggestion would help the crowded conditions, save many fish, and please most anglers. Require anglers to keep the first 3 fish hooked in the head, thus speeding the opening of docks and eliminating the waist of fish. This could for no extra cost produce some very favorable results. Fish and game does a very poor job of keeping people off banks. Fishing regulation enforcement on the upper river. Fly fishing for kings at clear creek confluences such as killed and funny river- should be allowed at least as a catch and release Lack of enforcement of laws and lack of resources for bank enforcement Need more enforcement of fishing rags. Limit check, snagging, etc. Number of boats on Chinook spawning beds in the middle river in July There must be a regulation test before crossing the ferry at red fishing time. There are too many different regulations concerning fishing, type of bait, limit on trout, dollies. People fishing in boat landing areas (Jim's landing) only part of the landing area is no fishing. Big Problems this year. Disturbance of spawning beds Damage /injury to indigenous fish on the upper and middle river. Maiming of trout due to catch and release fishery Parks Fish officers more worried about anglers too close to the bank and not angler safety Commercial fishing nets during high fish flow is complete Bull Shit! Very important- the amount of traffic on the Russian river after the salmon spawn destroys their redds Lack of fish in the river due to commercial netting Management of King salmon resource Overuse of resource (ecological concerns) Fishing trails could be marked maintained to keep damage to a minimum More Fish and Game presence on the river. Issues: Guide /non -guide Issues: Facility needs/ evaluations Kerla Dili Ea 3-n Some guides seem to think the river is for their personal use!!!! Too many guides taking Kings, Amount of guides on the river should be limited by the number of permits given!! 3 x Too many guides Guided boats jamming up limited pullouts areas as if they own them. Guides clients taking up parking spaces at boat ramps. Not an issue in Upper but is in Middle and Lower Guides parking boats in launch areas to fillet salmon, not allowing others to launch (Cooper Landing /Kenai Lake launch) Guides sometimes not very courteous Illegal guides -lots of them Far Too many guides on the river. They act as if they own it and more often than not are discourteous Problem with guides launching and waiting for clients, blocking tie ups at Pillars specifically Some of the guides were rude Out of state guides 5 The large number of guide fishing boats on the river The number of out of state guides on the river Number of guides extremely important There are too many guides on the lower Kenai- the Parks needs to put a cap on the number of guides on the Kenai River, They are pushy and rude. I have observed guides letting their clients urinate off their boats during king and silver salmon season. Give the river back to the local not the guides from Oregon /Idaho /Utah and the Pacific Northwest. They are raping our resource, Another day without guides on the river for locals and their families. To rnany out of state guides rudely interfering with my pleasure Too many guides on upper river especially in Aug -Sept during rainbow fishing. Guides should not be allowed to stop and fish gravel bars one mile upstream where Kenai R. enters Skilak Lake. Guides think they own the river and "push" local anglers off gravel bars. Local anglers (non guided) only power boat access is across Skilak Lake to mouth of River. Guides should be prohibited from fishing in this one mile corridor near Kenai Skilak mouth because of overcrowding and "aggressive" guides who have no regard that someone else is fishing the bar. They bring in dozens of clients (boat after boat); "fish -out" the rainbows and dollies, and then move on. Guides cutting off folks This was my first trip and I used a guide Unguided anglers not following ADF &G fishing regulations on the Upper Kenai River Too many out of state guides Too many guides on entire river; their numbers should be cut 50% in lower river and by 75% in upper river. Too rnany guides More public access to boat launches. The guides are switching boats and taking clients out on Sunday. If you fish the river as many days as I do you see the same guides with clients fishing on Sunday, There is no one policing the guides. I have been harassed by the coast guard multiple times and never once seen them check a guide boat. Guides staging in popular fishing holes before 6 am which restricts fishing the hole property for non guided boats Less guide days on lower Kenai River Major issue as there was only one place that all boats could use. Lack of camp sites. Love the Russian river camp grounds esp. off season There are too few camping places for someone to camp without being charged an arm and leg Fish cleaning facilities in the same area. In the lower river there are no boat launches below centennial on the west side of the river, all private launches are closed to public use, leaving only the pillars on the east side PUT IN MORE LAUNCHES1@#$%A&*( Jim's landing condition. Need ramp as the condition of take out was terrible this year Limit the number of guides or remove non resident guides from river The boardwalks are a good addition. Neat looking with cutting table. Steps into water. Good addition. Sportsman's Landing is unmanned after Labor Day. The Rainbow fishing is terrific at that time. It would be nice for the users and financially viable for the State to keep services available in September. Need dumpster at Jims landing We need a public boat launch mid way between Soldotna and Warren Ames Bridge BADLY NEEDEDT! Drift boat access especially for take -out Lack of launching facilities during the month of July Boat Ramp use, space availability Limited facilities for launching boat on the lower river Parking at Jim's Landing needs to be expanded or monitored Parking at Bings. Guides have clients park one to a slot, could stack two or three cars. Parking at the limited boat launches should be for users who are pulling a trailer and not for clients who meet their guides there and take up a parking spot. This often denies fishermen access to the launch Parking availability at some of the launch sites and reserving spots for boat trailer parking only. Parking facilities access for bank fishermen Restore Cunningham ramp Parking lot away from main lot for guides only, makes them pay for it. Number of campgrounds i pullouts along the highway to allow fatigued drivers a place to pull over to rest. Camping was rustic or extremely industrial. Very surprised as we are huge campers. Issues: Boating regulations and safety Canoes should be outlawed on the Kenai. To dangerous Increase of horsepower allowed I disagree with banning 2stokes. This is an elitists movement by the guides to keep locals off the river. You will never convince me that it is about the hydro carbons, I know that Yamaha and the guides drove this legislation. It's flat out wrong. Size of boats and weight carried combined with engine power and speed on bank erosion and wake People that are driving a boat but have no idea how to General public boaters not following navigation rules and safety Decrement of p safety en the w ater when tnn many powered boats are o n th river at the same time. Need no wake zone Issues: General crowding f competition or concerns about development Number of people on the Russian River Overcrowding of river (aesthetic concerns) Many of the parks (e.g. Centennial, Swiftwater, etc. Were overcrowded with anglers. Hard to get a spot. Fishing limits and their impact on crowdedness. Red fishermen have "mob" mentality- respect nothing and break every law you have. Designate top half of park for bank king fishing only Conflicts between bank anglers. Pollution of air and water by over abundance of powered boats on the middle river. I no longer fish there. Drift boats pulling to shore on top of bank fishermen red season, taking spaces Distance between anglers, should be required to be a minimum of 20 feet One angler takes a good spot on the bank for too long Boat safety: everyone seems very reasonable. of boats in July on lower: seems like there are too many. When the number of boats consistently exceed the fishing spots on the upper river and I have to wait for others to leave to have a spot to fish down river Camping of red salmon fisherman, The crowds need to be controlled, perhaps by a lottery? This situation diminishes the enjoyment. Maybe we need more facilities? Too many boats, and will run you over if you don't move The numbers of people bank fishing at the same time, and amount of people in campgrounds at the same time. Call me at for more opinion on this. Hove this river but disappointed when I see huge changes that cost money and devalue its use. It appears to me and many of the others I know who use this area that those making some of these decisions do not spend any time as a user of the area. Seeing these expensive changes was a total disappointment to me and many others who use the area. If it isn't broken don't spend public funds trying to fix it. I would truly love to hear from whoever made these decisions and try to understand why. It was a great area but has recently lost most of its appeal. When other boat anglers crown in on a spot I am fishing and push me out issues: Litter and human waste Human waste is a key issue for me; there is waste and tp on every gravel bar on the upper river Human Waste on shore in the Upper and Middle River Increase in the number of fires Lack of anglers picking up trash (monofilament line, hooks, lead weights and sinkers and plastic. Not enough TOILET facilities and very dirty Amount of fishing debris in river from anglers Bank anglers leaving trash, webs of line: very important Lead left in river Lack of toilets and developed camp sites on the Upper River (Human waste) I sometimes see trash and when I see trash, I usually discard them in proper place Waste receptacle issues Issues: Bears or bear regulations Do something about the bears -cut the numbers, All fish cleaning should be moved to ferry terminal side or river. Backpack on self if you're within lOyards Bear Control on the Upper Kenai near the Russian Bear /human confrontations Cleaning stations or gut grinders should be places on the Russian river. Lack of bear controls on the Kenai below Russian River by Park service and Fish and Game. It is people Hole. Bears should be (like it used to be) actively persuaded to go elsewhere. Salmon carcass iss Separate bears and anglers by moving fish carcasses downstream past the power line People shooting bears from the side of the highway. Not good, we enjoy co- existing and watching them. Provide industrial type grinders next to side of fish cleaning tables Leave Fish cleaning in the Kenai River below Russian River, alone. 1t is a bear problem not a people problem. Issues: More access Issues: Subsistence /personal use Access to boat launches is way too low Ensuring good access for drift boats and courtesy among anglers Every inch of the river that is not privately owned should be open to the public. My number one issue is access! Shore anglers are forced into very limited areas often resulting in terrible and dangerous conditions. Kenai River is resilient. Open more areas, let people know where they are, never over fish. Not enough public access to river bank fishing Private access impacts public access? The number of public access areas for bank fishing. Need to increase Leave the river accesses open to the locals all year Get rid of the damn gates and throw away the locks. Kerw, RI mar t)n Stucry P P WATE3 rMai Re:I pert verbgim comm.s: from usar survey:, Need to review the 'subsistence" dip netting for salmon. The catch numbers seem high when fish is 'given away" to other family and friends. If dip netting, set for special days, i.e, Odd/even calendar days, etc. Nets and 4 2,1::: nzu:t:WT Pam:: S Issues: Drift only Make the whole river drift boat only. That is the solution. Guides won't allow it though. Use of power boats on Mondays in the lower river in July has enormous impact on drift boats and should not be allowed. Use of powerboats on drift boat days No take out for drifters below pillars Need more drift boat days Outboard jet motor limits More drift boat only fishing on lower Kenai River Drift boat only days on lower river should be increased Issues: Fees Issues: Discourteous behavior What about a Season Pass to the launch? Access costs Cost of parking and camping. Cost of Russian river ferry has increased to high -one trip for fare Price of ferry The price of parking and launching from Sportsman's landing. The high cost of parking at Eagle Rock. Inept and dangerous anglers who have no regard for the fish or other anglers Lack of respect for this fishery by the majority of the usersltf German anglers very rude about not respecting your fishing space. Rude fishing practices {Germans) Too many Germans no following rules Some red fisherman are extremely rude, most are not. Too many anglers carrying guns more dangerous than bears are Issues: Handicapped and access for children Issues: Long responses or multiple issues A lot of fishing men is using the handicap space when I was there and I need to use it but there is a lot of fishing men there is not handicap of any kind Children's areas in upper fishing areas Changes at Morgan's Landing. Input from the user group would have had a more positive impact on so called improvements. Public funds were wasted on the "handy cap" access from the parking lotto the river, The platform near the rest rooms is a total waste. Filling in the back eddy hole and removing the small spit area was a huge mistake. I say this with 28 years of fishing this area. Once my favorite was somewhat ruined by Parks decision to fill the eddy area. The new platforms were built to high above the river bank. Handicap access Handicap access areas and non handicaps using solid spots not giving up said areas to the handicap. Conflicts between disabled areas being used by non disabled people Conflict with unimpaired anglers with impaired /disabled trying to use same resource There needs to be an area for kids to fish at the Russian river. Handicap area turned into Handicap/kids area. No handicap fishing at most sights This is not important to anyone ,unless you can't walk or stand this is criminal that this is overlooked and trash pickup, conflicts motorized boats etc are top priority Children's access to fishing Healthy and un- handicapped people using the designated fishing areas for the handicapped and elderlyllll 1 take issue too many things that I have seen over the past couple years (especially this past summer). People who intentionally aggravate /feed bears/provoke them by throwing rocks at them/use weapons when not warranted/ get too close to young cubs for pictures. E think that there should be time limits as to when boaters can float, different from when anglers can bank fish, and all people /boats should be off the river at certain times (unless camping). Like let's say from ferry closure (11 pm To lam? So that the bears have a chance to eat and not be disturbed by annoying, rude, provoking humans (esp. the drunken idiots out there that like to fire their weapons off at bears and birds). There are NOT enough fish/game people "policing" the areas at all! This past summer I was on the river almost every day from end of May to October and I only had one encounter with fish/game in regards to a bear that actually charged me (I was by myself). I always wear pink waders; can miss me. But I never provoke wildlife, and see other people doing so. Such as throwing rocks, giving them fish, cleaning fish on the river bank or on a boat and putting full carcasses in the water instead of using the cleaning stations (of which there are NOT ENOUGH of these) and people do not cut up the carcass in thirds before throwing in the river. Visitors and especially residents need to be more educated; and if more F &G were available on the banks, campsites, and boat launches they would see a lot of the problems that 1 am describing (especially people taking more than their limit!!) Discourteous behavior of other boaters bank fishers. 1. Boaters do not properly and effectively dock and get their boats out of the water promptly and are at times yelling and arguing with other people who have been waiting longer for a spot. I have never seen such bad behavior as I witnessed this past summer (and there is no F &G around to help protect those people that are being threatened). It is shameful on the part of the people who are causing the problem (especially those people that are AK residents, completely drunk and brag about how they caught more than the limit allowed) and shameful that there is no type law enforcement to help mediate /protect vulnerable people. 2. The so- called self proclaimed "gods of fishing" being rude and mean to those people that might be fishing for the first time. (You know the type. Either bank or boat fishing these men talk, brag, etc about how awesome they are at fishing, etc). And when you even get near them (let's say like when your bank fishing and you have a favorite watering hole to catch fish); these men that are already their curse and are threatening others if they do not get out of their drift or screw up their fishing experience. The people also seem to have already caught more than their limit (from what I could assess, have dogs off leash bothering, barking at other anglers, leave trash and garbage where they were fishing, and basically have no regard for other people wanting to fish or just trying it for the first time). It is ridiculous, intimidating, scary, threatening and makes people not want to come back to fish; they are like this esp. to women). I am a woman that likes to fish and many times will fish by myself for the tranquility of the experience. This past summer I have been cursed at, given insulting names, hit in the face with an ugly stick on purpose all because these men just wanted me out of the spot that they wanted to fish. I do have to say that it put a smile on my face when I would just take the higher road, be quiet and catch my limit and leave before these stubborn mean men even had one fish on. Karma comes around. Ha -ha. But on a seriously note, may people out their feel like they can get away with anything because there is hardly any authorities around to intervene. There is not even a phone to call to get a prompt response for help. I called once on 9 -17 (just after 1 had met And she gave me a number to call if a particular bear was seen again in the grayling parking lot. Well, sure enough, about 30 minutes after she left, a huge grizzly came charging up the graying steps chasing people to their cars. I called the number, gave a brief description of what was happening and was put on hold for about 30 minutes before my cell battery died). Overall, there is a lack of F &G patrolling the areas and a lack of common courtesy education of anglers on the river. It is getting out of control and I know this because 1 have been fishing the Kenai in the summer for about 10 years now and this past summer was the worst in regards to the issues already out fined. Ok, l will stop ranting on now, but I hope 1 am making my point clear about the issues because I know many people that do not want to ever fish their again because of some issues that we ran into as described. Other comments related to "issues" questions [I fish from) a private dock we have First year visiting -loved it -will return Never have encountered [conflict] Non residents should not be allowed camping /fishing on weekends Not requiring any kind of a permit system on the river. Resident vs. non resident We have never been mistreated by anyone on the river Unsightly commercial rentals on the lower river Visual impacts of docks and boardwalks: I like what has been done in Soldotna Other rivers they go to (when they feel crowded on the Kenai)? A variety of smaller, less used rivers north of Anchorage Alagnak drainage 3 x Anchor Anchor and deep creek Anchor or Kasilof Anchor, Deep Crlc., Montana Crk. Anchor, Resurrection Anchor, deep creek, Ninilchik Anchor, Kasilof, cook inlet Anchor /Deep Ck?i'm Any other Any river less crowded Anyplace north of anchorage Big Su tributaries Chulitna, Little Su, Willow Congestion at Jim's only concern Deep Creek, Anchor River, Kasilof River, Kachemak Bay Deep, Ninilchik, Anchor, Ptarmigan, Quartz Deshka river Float trips on Bristol Bay Rivers Funny River, Russian River, Anchor River, Kasilof, Ninilchik Head north 1 just don't go fishing I never fish for King salmon or reds on the Kenai. I fish for them on the Gulkana and Klutina to avoid the mania. I was only there for the 1 time; but it was crazy crowded; shoulder to shoulder fishermen; not sure how the fish have a chance to spawn 24 x Kasilof Kasilof for kings, head up to the valley more for 'bows Kasilof River Kasilof, Anchor Kasilof, Anchor River, Deep Creek Kasilof, Anchor, deep creek Kasilof, Anchor, Deep Creek Kasilof, Anchor, Swanson Kasilof, Deep Creek, Ninilchik or Inlet Kasilof, Deep Creek, Quartz Cr. Kasilof, Susitna Kasilof, Willow Kenai river drainages Kiutina Klutina or Gulkana Little Susitna Many Matsu Valley river system Naknek Ocean, Eklutna Ptarmigan Creek Quartz Creek, Anchor River Quartz creek, lakes, or don't go fishing when it's busy 3 x Russian River Veri Russian River, Quartz Creek, Ptamigan Creek Russian, Quartz Creek for Doilies Seward resurrection bay Sometimes choose to go other places just because the Kenai is often crowded... No particular place or river. Susitna Yetna Swanson River Taikeetna Taikeetna, Deshka, copper There are many rivers that I go to. Trout in the valley LE Montana, Willow creek Upper Russian River Various Went to Homer instead Willow Creek, Kashwitna, Taikeetna, Clear Creek Willow, Montana Other reasons for reducing or stopped fishing on the Kenai? Bank fishing in Lower and Middle river for 2nd run of reds is way to overcrowded due in big part to the following reasons: 1) Bank closures by State of Alaska for vegetation growth, and then no new areas opened up to counteract the loss of space 2) Length on time need to catch fish because of low fish returns and commercial overharvesting (past and present) After 4 -5 hours of a guided trip on middle river we told the guide we had enough. Too crowded and dangerous, you need no wake law Bears Because of handicap there are only certain areas that make fishing accessible.,..they really need to extend the area at the Russian river for our use...sometimes you have to wait for hours for a stop to fish...If some of us could wade to our mid calves and not have to walk far to do it that might also free up space in handicap area Bings landing is way too crowded, and I see actual fights break out there all the time, I think it should be regulated by a few Fish and Game officers constantly. Boaters consider anywhere on the bank their personal use and therefore, tie up their boat wherever is convenient for them. Therefore, bank anglers would have to get out of their way. Cost of parking and camping has gone up. ID-es not apply first year on river Emergency Orders! First scenic float...loved it! For upper river: 1 try to avoid labor day weekend too crowded Guiding has become a business not a sport! I came from out of state so my fishing opportunity is limited. I do more fishing using flyouts, Mt. Redoubt, etc. 1 find that this approach greatly increases my catch, as the Kenai not longer provides good returns. Kings are the worst problem. In addition to flyouts, we are staying longer in Homer. Much happier. You have to reduce commercial fishing!!! Please Please !!!i ?ilt! 1 don't go to Russian river from falls downriver. Once the Sockeye appear, This area should be closed. Once the fish hit the Russian river, they should be allowed to continue unharmed except for the natural interaction from wildlife. We should all work together to protect and enhance this habitat. Fishing here is just slaughter. I enjoy fishing from the bank and from watercraft. When the lower river is too crowded to safely handle watercraft I move upstream. I go to places that I know the fishing isn't going to be as good but less people throwing rocks at bears and throwing trash in the river. Anchorage people I have kids... No kid friendly places. 0 successes for the 15year old. Combat fisherman crowding. Was very frustrating. I have only fished this area twice, August 2009 and July 2007 I like to bank fish I live stateside and do not get to the Kenai often I moved fluene u t., 2110 I no longer fish Bing's Landing because of revegetation project.,, Middle River I no longer use a boat -parks and bank fishing Increase of horsepower on lower and middle. Wanton excess of fish caught and kept by foreign visitors on lower and middle It is so hard to get camping spot or even save area to park, to me that's the worst thing of all, you end up on side of the road,(not save it all) It's hard to get a ride back to the top (after drifting). Too much gas to take to vehicles. Lack of adequate boat launches on lower river. Especially for drift boat haul outs. Less shore access Lower river is a joke what a death trap Lower River. Safety is a real issuell!Overcrowding causes many injuries. I personally was injured, and assisted another angler who got a hook thru the ear Management of Morgan's Landing area. See comments made in previous statement. I still fish both upper and middle river. Most of the management efforts have been positive. My wife and I own a cabin and property on Keystone Drive near the landing but not on the river. My only trip to Alaska My use changed because of the birth of my daughter, now that she's a bit older, were getting back into to using the River more nearly as we used to before her birth. Need a lawyer to figure out how, and where to fish. And I don't understand why I can subsistence fish with a net but, not a pole. Nonresident upper middle lower Not enough regulation on the upper river, too much intentional snagging and abuse of fish. Only have been on one trip to Alaska The confluence at the Kenai /Russian rivers is a zoo. No fish and game presence or control. Foreigners (Germans) are rude and keeping other anglers from getting access to large areas. I suggest putting the limit at (1) fish per day for non residence in each segment. The unsafe drive on the Seward Hwy There are too few access points not enough parking. There are more people but you guys keep closing areas to bank fishing. The fry will be fine even without overhanging brush on the bank. Open the river back up to fishing or quit promoting it to tourist! Leave the parks open some people would like to fish and camp all year. Stop catering to the tourist us locals need access too, This was my first trip to Alaska so I have nothing to compare it to. I was a little surprised by the "combat fishing" in certain areas. Too little regulation on how fish carcasses are discarded. Too little regulation of market anglers especially Germans, Philippines' and Koreans. They are very blatant taking huge numbers of fish. speak German well enough to understand part of the conversations among German anglers, who chat about financing their "vacations" each year this way. If there was more law enforcement presence, we could finger the culprits on site and let the officer's document their activities). Too many bears. Too many guides! Too many guides! Very limited places to put -in and take -out boat (Centennial, Stewarts, Pillars, Eagle Rock) Water too high We did not want to wait for hours at the Kenai Public Dock on key weekends during the 2nd red run. Boats were parked along the road then. My husband isn't patient enough to wait... We now fish the lower Kenai ONLY on Drift Boat Mondays. Much too crowded with powerboat. Will upgrade the outboard to 4 strokes to dip net the mouth of the Kenai only. Won't fish on powerboat days any longer..,miss the Kenai River of 25 yrs ago! Would rather fish off season and catch nothing then deal with the crowds /rude people. Fly outside and fish on vacation, Other specific management actions for the entire river 2 days of no motor use on the Kenai A class on rowing a drift boat/raft Add a second day no motor use. Conf Add additional no motor days on the middle and lower river Add another no motor day" for drift -only on lower and middle river besides just Mondays in May June and July Additional drift boat days that may include guided trips. Allow bear hunting to kill the bears. Mow campground reservations only for Alaskan residents Allow for larger boat launching operations so that we don't have so many cars /trucks backed up at the launches and idling. Pillars for example, Bings for another example. Room for three abreast might allow for two launches or take outs at a time. Avoid increasing the limits. It ends rapid turnover of anglers and crowds up the river. Beef up enforcement -there must be consequences fines) for those people who behave in destructive and unsafe ways. Better enforcement of current regulations Better web based sites that are more informative about when, where, and how to fish Boaters to stay in middle of river and away from hundreds of anglers Build a bridge at the Russian River ferry Change color of vegetation barriers from orange to brown or green. The orange is an eye sore it takes away from the beauty of the river, Close the Russian at night to allow bears time on the river 11pm -5am Close upper river to guides on Mondays June July Count the Kings and Sockeye runs longer Create no fishing zones" within 200 ft of boat launches. Create habitat with stumps and trees /brush guides must be AK resident& Create more drift boat pull off zones that are not accessible by foot or other means Create more public launch sites for mid river Decrease number of guides by half Decrease the amount of guides on the river and amount of commercial fishermen. Suggested action: In order to get a guide permit or commercial permit you must prove (yearly) that you have not left the State of Alaska for more than 60 consecutive days or 90 nonconsecutive days in the previous year Dipnetters overwhelm cleaning stations, especially Centennial Campground in Soldotna. I've seen dippers come in with 100+ fish and take up the cleaning stations for hours and leave a huge mess of carcasses. Dippers need cleaning stations AWAY from campgrounds and established bank fishing sites with the wonderful boardwalk access! Do a better job enforcing F &G laws, larger fines, litter fines, poaching fines Each angler must leave area with more trash then they came in with...Stewardship Eliminate bank closures where the shoreline is gravel!!! Eliminate the "joke" regulation of 5OHP motors eliminate all motors except 9,9hp Enforce "no loitering" rules at launches. Space is often occupied for 20 -30 minutes by guides waiting for their passengers, preventing launches by people who are "ready to go". Enforce laws already enacted Enforce regulations on snagging, hook gap size, and number of salmon allowed Erect signs with simple instructions and post amount of fines for ignorance Expand handicapped fishing to include jr. Fisherman Get the power boat users to use better etiquette during peak King Salmon run on the lower river Handicap access areas Have guides pack out all client waste, toilet paper and feces and recommend this for private boaters Have officials from harassing public! Have some areas reserved or with priority for family with children like Morgan Landing to fish from platform. How about building more walkways so fishermen don't have to walk on vegetation. Don't put more restrictions by closing off areas. That makes no sense How about leaving the river alone! Just close it down so people quit coming. Give the fish a break I believe in environmental education as the best way to influence change and thus protect our forests and rivers -it starts in our schools and homes. 1 have photos of anglers standing in front of signs and fishing in areas that I think they are not supposed to fish in at the mouth of the Slikok River.,.enforcement would help. These guys could read and knew what they were doing! They needed a ticket! I like the idea of brochures, but 1 can also see them adding to the trash around the banks! I support no anchoring in channel, but not during silver season. It needs to be enforced during drift boat Monday. Anchoring on drift boat Monday only allows one boat to fish some holes and everyone else is relegated to fishing outside the slot" I would like to see the handicap area either made larger or a restriction on who can fish there. Being handicap I have endured crude remarks from people who think the fish only swim in front of the handicap. I would rather be one of the people who are able to stand in the water &fish If not already limited, I would favor limiting the number of guide boats on the upper river. Increase enforcement/contacts during peak seasons on upper river within campgrounds too, increase nonresident guide license fee Leave us alone Less regulation, more education. Limit the amount of guide licenses Limit and police the guides. The big money controls the river trying to push the local angler off. Limit the number of guides. Limit boats to 20ft. Limit guides on upper river. Take days off from guides. Limit guides to an odd day or even day access to the river. (e.g. One half of the guides could fish on even numbered days or odd numbered days according to their license number) Limit guides to four days on the river per week. Limit the total number of guides allowed on each section of the river to reduce pressure. Limit number of fish caught and permits sold to foreign nationals Limit on guide boats for river and limit to only one area Limit the amount of guides allowed on the River and require them to Ak, Residents Limit the amount of guides on the river; 800+ is too many. SIB AK resident to guide on Kenai Limit the number of guide boats that can be on the river at one time, there are way too many and it greatly affects the people that are going out with their families Limit the number of guide permits (lower, middle and upper river) Make platforms useable...NOT like what was installed at Morgan's Landing Monitor guides parked at launches 2 hours before they can fish and ticket them More dumpsters More enforcement of existing regulations More handicap access areas More handicap areas More Liter t b., p i c I,..,4 vc litter 1v be N I_.r�au Lip More ranger visibility at high use areas. NOT fishing regulation enforcement.., Just visibility. Most aggressive boaters seem to be guides who are fanatical about getting their clients fish No beer bottles No comment No guided fishing on Sundays Mondays for ENTIRE season i.e. Thru end of year. No more new powerboat guides /drift only for new sticker Open more of the river it is a joke to promote tourism get people to spend thousands of dollars to come out to the peninsula then cram them in like sardines to the few places that are open on the river. The no anchor and the 10 foot high water mark rule are a joke right? Sorry I am not correct this rule is so stupid it stinks. Open up more remote areas for those of us who would prefer a more "wilderness experience When our first stop was Centennial park, 1 was ready to head back to North Carolina rather than fish with those crowds. 1 was able to sneak down a trail and get away from all the people, but I am not even sure if I was supposed to be on that trail. It was not marked as anything, but the locals kept telling me it would be a 200 fine to get caught on the grass. Outhouses in the Upper, Canyon, and Middle on shore. Permits should be handed out to locals on the Kenai that have live in the towns surrounding it before they are given to people from the valley or Anchorage and only so many permits per year. The boating traffic needs to be fixed and at least cut in half. Place rip rap in areas of high bank usage. Post signs: "Don't hog the hotspots, share your spot once you limit out" Protect the environment and the Kenai river ecosystem as the number one priority, Reduce fish limit, Restrict Dip net fishery to low income Kenai watershed residents Reduce non- resident guides Reduce number of guides on upper Kenai Reduce number of guides- extremely important Reduce the number of guide boats on the river Reduce the number of Guides Require a Catch Release license for rainbow trout dolly varden before you can fish the Kenai. Require children to use pfd's Requiring (or at least allowing) anglers to keep foul hooked fish in the upper river fly fish only zone. This would decrease crowding because people would limit out and leave in a shorter amount of time. Also reduce incidental killing of salmon. Residents only fishing and more rights for and owners Resident vs. Nonresident Saw at least one bank COVERED in fish carcasses, looked like a fish cemetery, stank, and attracted bears. Need fish carcass dumping regulations Set firm catch limits enforce them to prevent over catch Signs, boardwalks, stairs, ugly fences and all the other crap needs to go. Silver fishing is for anchoring! We anchored up for years on this river, before all the guide activity. Stop drinking on boats Take fish home to clean them, cuts down on cheaters as well. 0 cleaning tables. The last thing we need is more regulations. The vast majority of boating problems revolve around guides and non guided fishermen. Too many guides are licensed on the river. They "hog" the best holes, drift areas, etc,, and their etiquette on the river toward non guided anglers is usually despicable. Non- guided anglers can usually resolved issues among themselves, but guides have little incentive to compromise and share the river. In fact it's the opposite. Because the success of their business is related to how many fish they can catch for their clients, they crowd into good fishing areas with little regard who was there before them. Here's the best management action you could pass. Allow guided anglers on the river only 2 -3 days per week or cut the number of guides by 75 Toilet paper refills at porta pottys etc Unfortunately this is a time to watch budgets and you can't making stupidly against the law Urge the addition of more cleaning tables on the Kenai River Russian River confluence at the ferry! We clean our fish at hope -fast moving water Absolutely no smoking, drinking of alcohol or use of illegal hooks, or sharing limits. Additional state owned drift boat take out Allow guides to fish everyday if they use a non motorized craft. Also, more cleaning tables needed at the swift water areas; especially those near the airport Bank trampling you have to maintain every year, a boardwalk you don't. Better enforcement of current regulations Change commercial fishing day to Tuesday, to improve fishing on no motor days. Children access areas Cleaning stations down river instead of in the middle of fishing areas Decrease number of guides by half Do not allow guide boats in parking /launching areas until just before they are allowed to fish Drift boat only sections of the Kenai Enforce the chop and throw rule it works Enforcement of litter laws during peak sockeye periods. Including feeding of bears (an increasing problem)! Ensure that fishing populations continue Harvest restrictions will decrease participation in the fishery (catch release on kings) Have a food /coffee hut /limited tackle supplies collection donation to pay for better area management at grayling and at ferry area (I will open one ad manage it if u need help) I don't' think many people would take the time to go to a course, or pay MORE for a boating license. But if there was a free online tutorial that was required, that would be important. If you purport to have a 50hp reg-- enforce it. Some guide boats have 75 -90hp hidden under 50hp covers. You can't get a 20ft boat flying up the river against the current with four full size adults plus a guide. It is a travesty what the wakes are doing to the banks!! Increase rags enforcement. Higher F &G visibility /presence. Allow all F &G to write tickets. Limit power boat use in the middle river. Limit the hours a guide boat can be on the river Limit the number of people allowed to cross the Russian River Ferry per hour to control pressure. Limited non residents anglers to 6 red salmon per season and one king on a punch card. At that point only catch and release fishing is allowed. Lottery or registration only Make it easier for Alaska Residents/Kenai Peninsula residents to have river access. Suggested Action: Setup Day's, Time of Day, Specific Areas, or a combination of the three that are for Alaska Residents /Peninsula Residents Only More launches in spite of the complaints from private boat launches. Re- install the campground at the Kasilof boat launch. Open more areas, use website to detail where, keep things efficient, cost worthy. Open up King Fishing season but make it catch and release Please do something about the human waste! Promoting a team approach to management and conservation by educating users, Punish litterers Put in more parking at pillars and let us use our passes Require a license. For operating a drift boat or raft of any size Set aside (1) day a week for residence of the Kenai Peninsula only Stop trying to micro manage the river if we wreck it we will deal with it. There is now way to accommodate the amount of people that want to fish. At the end there will be no battle when all the fish are gone These guides are trying to make a living from sport fishing and use all the tax payers' facilities, Limit their use of the river! We need enforcement of bag limits at the mouth of the Kasilof, too. People talk about how many people haul out huge numbers of fish. Education would be helpful but enforcement would do more to help, 1 think. Why is it such a job to patrol the river? How much more money does the fish and game need? Zone off spawning /nesting beds year round to protect eggs and smelt for renewable resource Other comments about use limits or the mandatory registration system concept Add more boardwalks in closed areas As a resident, I want unlimited access to my rivers. Limit the guides. How about "resident' only days! Just dreaming! Better improvements to high volume fishing areas less administration Decrease number of guides Don't know Guides need to pick up clients and then go to the boat launches or there needs to be a car parking only lot. Too often Bings launch is full of cars and maybe 15% truck/trailers, come on, it is a boat launch for crying out loud, get rid of all the cars. We want to launch our boat and not have to walk a mile. Guides would control. What problem would it solve? Nothing How you going to track if every boat on the river is registered for that day However, not all sections of the Kenai have internet or cell phone reception; maybe have a check in system at the boat launches i don't boat enough I don't generally use a boat so cannot comment on this 1 don't know I hate to suggest this, but how about preference for kp residents? This has economic impacts, 1 know... I live in cooper landing; don't want to be not allowed to float when I want. I object because organized groups would or could block out available use such as what has happened at some of the campgrounds. First come basis should still be the rule. If 1 couldn't get access to certain bank areas, I would stop coming to the Kenai and spending my money there! rc If the number of boats that could register is unlimited what's the point. We already know there are too many boats on the lower river. If there are no limits on registration there will still be to many people so bad idea all the way around If there was a registration program it would have to include the guides in addition to private anglers It doesn't solve the problem It is nature, didn't move here to fill out paperwork to enjoy it! It would just be another thing we'd have to do to get on the river and you have better, cheaper ways of monitoring use Keep Alaska free. Keep costs down. Manage efficiently and effectively without creating a new category of government employee that is not needed. Limit number of guides Locals that are from Soldotna or any city by the river such as I should be able to over ride people from Fairbanks for the permit system, Make guides be Alaskan residents Maybe but it depends on how much it cost per registration, example: river boat guide services w14 boats have mandatory rotation. See end comments More hassle means fewer users... Which is good. No, because you have not clearly articulated the objective of mandatory registration No, I think a mandatory boater's license would take care of the uninformed out of state boaters using inadequate and out of date boats Not a boater Or at least give us info on how much the river is being used /abused Preference must be given to private local individuals with the goal of reducing guided trips Prohibiting new guides from entering the fishery and reducing their presence numbers would accomplish more in reducing crowding that any of your other options. Quit making rules, you will never make everyone happy or safe. Should allow for flexibility if plans /conditions change Start big government stupidity and that will be the last straw I will sell my boat The lower river is getting choked with boats during peak king runs. The guides will still be on the river unregulated this will only restrict the private user. The river saw far less use this year than previous years, there really aren't any issues on the river, and people just make it out to be. There are no "safety" issues that I am aware of, except maybe the use of "too small of boat'. Too many guides Use limits are necessary to protect from over fishing. Every other state has them, why doesn't Alaska? We already register when we launch our boats and park our vehicles. Mandatory registration is redundant at this point. We only fish Kenai 2 or 3 days a year so would not like mandatory permit Other comments about "drift only" issues 2 days, would help take pressure off the Kenai All fishing should be limited to 16hrs /day At least 1 more drift only day BUT WITHOUT GUIDES! We already have guides out on drift boat Monday illegally and "under- cover We see it all the time. Please give back some quality time to the folks that live here! Ban power boats on the Kenai River! Continue to allow power boating between bank angling areas on drift only days Decrease the number of guides. Do not issue new powerboat guide permits, only issue new drift boat permits Drift days reduce pollution and the fishing is generally better. People are also more relaxed and courteous. Drift fisherman are much more courteous to be around and I have seen a huge increase in the number of drift boats. Drift boaters do not negatively impact the precious river banks. Drift only allows people to enjoy the entire experience of the Kenai without further distraction from outside noise. The river should be kept as natural as possible portraying it in its entirety and most natural environment. Drift only days on the lower and middle Kenai should be eliminated. The drift boats have the upper river and if they choose to drift fish on the lower river then they can fish with the powerboats. Drift Only gives a break on the river for one day which is sufficient to give the motorized boats a day off, forcing people to drift any more than one day would be counterproductive to those who cannot afford a drift boat trip. Drift boat only is unfair. How about no driftboat day? Fair is fair Drifting is a more relaxing pleasant fishing experience. Air Pollution will be reduced bank erosion will also be reduced, and noise pollution will be reduced. Enact a regulation that only allows drift fishing from Bings Landing upriver to the outlet of Skilak Lake Fish the Kasilof Guides totally dominate this river. Going drift would greatly improve this resource Guides should not be allowed on drift only days because the goal is to reduce crowding. If guides are allowed on drift only days, the industry will "gear -up" and soon crowding will be as worse than ever. I believe the amount of powerboat fishing for kings and rainbows needs to be reduced over a week regardless of how you do it. The river and fish needs a break from the hordes of power boaters. I see nothing wrong with bank fishing or drift fishing on the days power boating is not allowed. At least 2 days per week without power boaters would be better than one but more than that would be unfair to their businesses. I have fished both ways in June, power boat drift boat. The water is low and clear, usually, and the stealth of the drift boat is the right technique. Not a bunch of powerboats that don't know any better running up and down over the good water scattering and spooking the trout. I have lived in Soldotna for 32 years, my parents owned the Bunk House, now hooligans. I have been involved in Kenai river tourist fishing for many years. The Kenai river needs to become a drift boat only river. The amount of power boats on the river has gone overboard. It is time to shut them down 100 I haven't any real knowledge to base an opinion I find this survey to be completely ridiculous since I've been fishing on the Kenai exactly one week and I haven't a basis for comparison. Your survey taker was unnecessarily aggressive. 1 like the idea of drift only days. There is one overall problem. The river and local transportation is not well set up to transport carsltrailerslpeople to take out locations and there are not enough boat launches for access and/or take out. Drift Only should allow for the carrying of an outboard motor which can be placed on the drift boat/raft for transport back to the originating boat launch. Once the motor is placed on the boat fishing would need to be done for the day. I own and love operating my powerboat. That being said, I believe that drift only days should really mean DRIFT ONLY and no (zero) powerboats should be allowed on the river at all on those days so designated. 1 spent a week on the Kenai in September and most of the drifters did not have a clue. The small pontoon boats should be outlawed. I strongly support an increase in drift only days but not with drift boat guiding allowed anything that either power or drift that increases guide days is unacceptable period. 1 think "drift only" days should be added to all parts of the river so as not to over populate any section on the not drift only" days. I think powerboats should be allowed non -guide only. See how that works. Even better only for the disabled like a blue parking sticker. I think the days for drift only should roll each week so there are different days each week. I think the river should return to being closed to fishing from ANY boat on Mondays in July. I truly believe that the impact of drift boat is minimal to the eco system and power boats should be banned. I also think a guide is mandatory for safety, education, conservation and communication of environmental concerns. 1 paid for a 7 mile drift, learned more, saw more, felt more comfortable about catching my limit in a way that gave the fish a chance and the experience left me at peace while firing me up to do something to help save this precious pristine environment that has drastically changed in the 20 years I have been visiting this GREAT FRONTIER, I would allow powerboats on Sunday and Monday drift only the rest of the time. I would like to see one more drift only day during which guides are not allowed to work the river. Guides are working on drift Monday now. There needs to be real enforcement, I would like to see more drift only days, but not on the Highest use days, Fri, Sat, Sun. So as to minimize impact on power boat users. If more than one "drift only day is added per week, and we end up with three drift only days, then conversely during the power boat days, the non powered rafts and drift boats should not be allowed. Adding more drift only days will push power boat use to the other days resulting in higher overcrowding on powerboat days. If the Kenai is to survive as a world class fishery power boating must be curtailed. If we are going to limit the use of a local with a power boat. First we should make all guides drifters only. I'm guessing there are drift only days in place now? Drift only days are a good idea. If in place, they should be sufficient. I think the river it too heavily used and needs some limits set. I'm not saying close it to use. It is a valuable resource and an enjoyable day /vacation area. Just set and enforce reasonable use limits to prevent over use and enforce them. Again; other states have such laws and rules, why doesn't Alaska, This isn't the lawless wild west. 33 year Alaskan married to a 50 year (life long) Alaskan. I'm not a guide but they should be able to guide on drift only days as long as they are in a drift boat. They are trying to make a living for crying out load. It seems like a good way to keep the public fishing and give the river a break to let fish pass. If management of the fishery requires no fishing days, the added drift only days could work well. The idea of splitting the upper and middle drift only days would be nice to give people more drift only days and keep the guides in business too, It would be good for the river to add these days. We should consider adding strategically placed access launches to make drifting more convenient. Reduce the motor boat allowance on at least some days to give the river a completely motor free recovery period might help the river recover from decades of over use and abuse. It's nice, for the drift boaters, that there is a day they can use the river to themselves. However, there are no "powerboat" only days and there are sections of the river, both middle and lower, that are more conducive to either powerboats or drift boats. Though I only have a powerboat right now, I have owned both types over the years and have enjoyed fishing from both. I typically handled the use of each in the same way I handle the crowding issues. That being instead of only using the drift boat on "drift only" days I used it in areas of the river that were more conducive to that type of boat and not as conducive to powerboat usage. I do the same thing with my powerboat during July. Instead of insisting on fishing in the crowded areas, I tend to move to less crowded areas and utilize the good fishing holes in that stretch of the river. It is seldom, even in July, that I cannot find a good spot to fish that there are a minimum number of other users, thus less (or no) crowding issues. My feeling is that most of the complaining about crowding, and/or type of boat usage opportunities, stems from a person being set on fishing from a certain type of boat or fishing in a specific spot and not being willing to learn the river better and being willing to move around more. Extreme example of this would be a person who insisted on fishing the Eagle Rock area, in July, then complaining about how crowded it was, or quit fishing the river because of it. I caught my first salmon in the Kenai River in 1963 and have fished it exclusively since 1983, mostly as a private individual (though I did guide from 1992 -1999, and still would if had I been able to find a different and good winter job), In the guide years, I ignored the crowding and fished wherever it would give my clients the best chance to catch fish, but now use the areas that give me the most enjoyment. It has changed a lot, in a lot of ways over this time, but I still enjoy fishing the river and simply move to less crowded areas to enhance my enjoyment of the river. Let guides do drift only No guide boat drifts on drift days No guides drift boat days. Too many guides are the root of the problem. No power boats on river on drift only days period People from out of town who use guides get their vacations complicated Power boating on the river causes a great deal more damage than any other activity. Severely limiting power boat access is the best way to preserve the river and the ecosystem. Powerboats are still used on Mondays -to go red fishing sightseeing etc. Have seen guides use Monday with personal /numbered guide boats Powerboats should not be on the river on drift only days, Prefers "drift only added in January, I am too old to use a drift boat! Really 1 think most everyone would enjoy a quiet experience. The guides are all about money; get as many as you can get out there as fast as you can Resident vs. Nonresident Save the River from the motors Schedule commercial fishing on non drift only days. The "drift boat Monday" Is a joke!! The number of powerboats blasting up and down the river is less than a normal day but is still ridiculously high. Guides are racing up and down the river taking clients to bank fish. Boats are blasting by to dip net. Other boats seem to race around waking out drift boats just for fun. If you hope to improve the quality river experience then "drift boat" day should be just that nothing but drift boats allowed on the river at all. If you went to a minimum of three drift only days -NO powerboats at all you might lessen the rape of the river. I have gone to fish the Kenai for the last three years and have witnessed a travesty! In some areas the bank has eroded 8 -10 feet!! In three short years. On one day this year my friend (who lives in Wasilla) and I had floated down to a gravel bank to fish for reds. In the three hours we fished I saw several hundred pounds of sand and gravel crash into the river and float away due to the incessant wakes of the enormous a if guide boats with 4 or 5 clients that blasted by. In another location where we walk in (Moose Meadows) the bank is now 1 to 2 feet behind the metal walkway when three years ago it was several feet in front of the 6 foot wide walkway. That is almost 10 feet of erosion in three years! This year I watched my buddy helping his 8 year old son catch his first sockeye and realized that at the current rate of destruction his son will never be able to repeat this with his own kids. It makes me very sad to see the powerboats destroying the river 1 love. More drift boat ONLY days could certainly slow the destruction and provide a more peaceful quality experience for boaters and bank users alike. Another idea I have heard while on the river is limiting powerboats to 9.9 hp motors. This would allow them to put in above their desired fishing spots and work through a hole, They would have to take out much lower on the river since they could not blast up current. This would virtually eliminate the wake damage yet still allow guides to take clients out to fish for Kings. The drift only days reduce erosion, pollution and crowding on the river. The Kasilof River is already a drift only river and it does not have a public access pull -out on the lower section of that river. State Parks should focus on securing a public access on the lower Kasilof river to maintain that system as a drift only river for kings. The upper Kenai River is already a drift only river no power boats. The middle and lower Kenai River section have 7 days a week for drift boats with no day restrictions. The attempt to add more drift only days in these two sections of the river are a well thought out public policy. Below Eagle Rock the next take out is the Kenai public dock and that is a long section of the river that is tidally influenced and also the most popular king fishery and very popular for Coho fishing. Also, most property owners along the middle and lower section of the river have powerboats it is why they bought property along the Kenai River. Adding more drift only days pushes property owners off the river, and if they have drift boats makes them use the already inadequate public access system. The policy is not well thought out, and there is no fiscal plans at all on retro fitting the already crowded and inadequate public access locations: Issues include: are you going to seriously ask for more drift only days in July and have drift boats going down to the Kenai dock area during the personal use dip net fishery? That would be asinine public policy. Plain STUPID some people do advocate for more drift only days but when pressed on some basic issues they have no clue on how to proceed. Has anyone approached the city of Kenai on expanding the Kenai city dock area parking? Is State Parks going to put in a public take -out at the Warren Ames Bridge and provide ample parking for the shuttle take -out there? Is the city of Kenai going to retro fit Cunningham Park for drift boat take outs and expand the parking area there for shuttle take -outs? If not, then why would we even ask the question of adding more drift only days in the most popular area of the river for kings and Coho's, when it isn't even properly equipped for drift-boat take outs? They should allow the guides on the drift only days with drift boats This is not a big problem. Let people use the river when they are there. This is the only way to save the run of Kings This is very little impact on river most drifters are more courteous than power boats Too many respondents who oppose additional drift days will miss this section due to the screen which allowed them to skip Until more launches are constructed, this is a non- issue. I am a local who works during the week from 8 -5, it is just not feasible for a person like me to stage vehicles and complete a drift in 2 -3 hours. When more "drift only days are added, you take away freedoms from working class citizens of the community. If more drift days must be added, consider allowing kicker motors to power boats to pull out facilities after fishing has been completed, motor use could be limited to power down river only. Use of a motor would be allowed once fishing has stopped for the day. Water flow in July is so high it limits effective drift fishing except in certain spots which even then get crowded. Additional days for drift fishing would just be another day the river isn't fished much (for kings) We always drift on Mondays it is the highlight of our fishing trip to Alaska We NEED more drift days... And one day needs to be a weekend day. With the increase in private drift boats on the lower Kenai, new users need a course on etiquette and common courtesy You have removed my motor that I get to run maybe one or two time a year on the lake so no powerboats at all. So send all the guide back to the lower 48. Other comments about guide /non -guide issues (pro guides) Ail users need an appropriate method to reduce river use. Education is always beneficial. From stubborn arrogant know it all fishermen to the simple casual not so educated about boating /fishing etiquettes individual, if there were some educational etiquette guidelines taught 1 think it would help. Pg Fishing the Kenai River is already too complicated with all the rules and regulations. For visitors like us, who only come to Alaska to fish, we have to have fishing guides to understand the rules. If you limit them even more, we will quit coming. The rules are taking away all the fun. Guided use is typically lighter impact and has better fishing results. But do not restrict the rights of the private individual to float just because they are less familiar with the river or are not as skilled at catching. Guides are important on the Kenai and should continue to be present on the Kenai, but an overall permit should be used like all major commercial fisheries. I am not a guide and do not use them with few exceptions (fishing with visitors). However, I strongly support the guides on the Kenai and have found there to be far more respectful of the river than non guides. I believe that a Kenai River Powerboat test/license and/or permit will calm the waters and resolve most of the issues mentioned in this survey about discourteous boating and fishing. I'm aware of a number of seasonal local and out of state rookie guides who are very aggressive and have pushed me out of a few holes. I'm aware of inexperienced boaters who have clogged up holes for me when I've used a guide. The issues are with the inexperienced, too infrequent users who are clueless to manners, general courtesy and safety protocols. I like your use of the word "some" when referring to both guided and unguided users. My feeling is that if you examined (for instance) 100 people in any category (boaters, auto drivers, fellow workers, retail customers, guides, commercial fishermen, etc.) You would find a relatively small percent to be "real jerks the vast majority would be average decent people, and another small percentage would be exceptionally polite, considerate, good folks. As mentioned previously, I have fished the Kenai as both a private individual and a guide and have found that both groups contain about the same mix of folks as mentioned in the above illustration. I have been, in my opinion been mistreated by both private individuals and guides, have been blessed by the actions of both private individuals and guides, and have just gotten along reasonably well with the vast majority. I will say that though l firmly believe that every private boater has as much right to be on the river as anyone else, sometimes their lack of understanding of river etiquette, fishing styles, boat operational skills, etc. will cause problems in a particular fishing spot and they will often blame "the guides" (or to a lesser degree the other more experienced users) for the resulting problems. I support guided use for many reasons, and am not a guide. I believe that they show people with all experience levels how to properly handle all levels of the river system, from the fish, to vegetation, to working with unguided users themselves. in almost every situation I've encountered, the private boater/fisherman causes more problems than any guide could. l think overall, guided use has less impact per day fished than unguided use. The economy of the Kenai would collapse if guided use were to be curtailed. Guided use allows for more fishing using proper techniques with less impact than unseasoned amateurs fishing. I was fishing reds and really did not have any problems with the guide boats, except an occasional wake that went over my waders, The river of course was very high this year and possibly a "no wake" zone in the congested areas would be a good idea. If guides are a problem, they can be identified and reported. The purpose of licensing guides is to ensure safety through control of their behavior. I believe we should work within the existing regulations and control mechanisms rather than creating new regulations. I've generally had good experiences with guides on the upper river. It is the unguided boats that seem to be the majority of the problem. Look at the number of violations on the river do they come from guided anglers or anglers who are unguided? Again, why reduce overall use? If it is crowded, there are fish in the river. Crowding is a result of fish in the river. Is there a trend in not making the biological escapement goals for kings, reds, Coho's or pinks, or a marked decline in the overall health in the resident populations? If you really want to reduce use on the river, level the playing field and have every boat user pay the same fee a seasonal use fee, for everyone guides and non guides. What do guides pay now $1,200 or more? Make everyone pay that. Crowding might go down. Would that make everyone happy? Probably not, especially the people who now get to fish on the river for FREE, But it would make the river less crowded and only with people who paid to be on it. Most guides are very professional and proficient- -there are just so many of them on the river! This summer, some of the worst boaters l observed were private boat owners who hadn't a clue about boat etiquette. It was scary to dock around them yikes! Please keep in mind that most of your guided users are tourists that spend a lot of money to get the chance to have a great fishing experience and also spend money supporting the local economy. Too many limitations may end that. Our guide was awesome, extremely knowledgeable, by the book, very conscious about the river, fish, wild life and related environment. If others were like him and cared half as much, problems would dwindle and the fish, game and environment might turn around and begin to prosper. I hope this particular guide is recognized and studied by others for proper stewardship of this land!!!! He is that Good. Our group learned more about the river, fish, mountains, proper boating, curiously, safety and thankfulness for our bounty in 7 miles (Upper Kenai river) than I have learned in several trips to Alaska and 40 years of fishing, We had absolutely no trouble with others, no safety issues, great fishing and unforgettable scenery. The five of us in our group will all agree this is true fishing ..,totally positive experience. Very very little loss of tackle, No trash, No problems with others fishing on shore or in other boats and all of this with an education that all should receive. Qualifying guides is a plus. Licensing of unguided boats for use on the RIVER WOULD BE A PLUS. [These questions] are very skewed and leaning does not seem to usable data for determining fishing policy. I object to the way that question [2'd in guided list] was asked, River is very crowded on Sundays in July when no guide boats are on the river. Weekends are the worst (Anchorage) The guides are not an issue on the River. I have fished on the River for 20 years and have seen densities of boats increase and decrease. I have found that the density of boats in any given stretch of the River or fishing hole is proportional to the amount of fish in those areas. This season had a relatively poor King Salmon return, warm water temps, and high water from flooding, therefore density of boats on the river were decreased. The people that think there is a crowding issue are either people that don't fish the river, or have inadequate experience of equipment. I have invested in nice equipment, similar to guides, and have a wonderful experience on the river. I believe nature limited the use on the river this year. I'd much rather fish with the Guides on the river, than after 6pm or on Sundays with the un- guided crowds, there's always people that don't know the ropes during that time. This question does not discriminate between Upper and Lower river guides. This fact should be strongly considered when reviewing this info. There is a big difference and neither party should be restrained by others regulations. This was my first time in Alaska. 2 days salmon and one day halibut fishing. River bend guides were GREAT! I believe that for the money spent, guided fishing should have a higher limit. We have always fished with guides; they have a strong desire to protect the river, the fish, and their livelihoods. I once saw a guide refuse to sell salmon roe to a non who planned to fish for trout because it kills too many fish. Trout fishing should be single barbless hooks, flies and lures only With any scenario, it comes down to a few guided or unguided who will eventually cause controversy for all users of the Kenai. In my observations, it is the unguided who do not take the time to do the proper research of the area and Kenai to know what to expect upon arrival and throughout their experience either by fishing location or by tackle. During my observations, the guides were extremely helpful and knowledgeable being courteous to other anglers around the anglers the guides were supporting and offering assistance to other guided anglers from differing guide services. Again the guide academy has worked great. General users need to get over the "I can do what I want when I want." I'd rather people use guides than get in rental boats, talk about conflicts and safety issues. They are the worst. Other comments about guide /non -guide issues (pro limits on guides or anti guides) A new, designated boat launch for guides only would be a great potential solution for overcrowding at the Pillars specifically. Make all public launches off limits to licensed guide and client parking. At this time the clients park cars at (Pillars) taking up many spaces for "private" angler parking. As we all know much of the guided doltars go south; do not end up in AK Biggest problem I've had is poor behavior by unguided fishers Boater education is very much needed but how to accomplish? Too many boaters ignoring the regulations, such as anchoring in the channels. Too much "fighting and yelling" on the river due to those ignoring the rags. More enforcement needed. Bottom line there are just too many guides it is no longer an economic impact analysis it is health of the river and local residential issue reduce the number if guides period Cut down on number of guides on river, it's ridiculous out there. Everyone thinks they're a guide on the river...you have allowed too many already. And they all think they own the river. Only few can do it right and give their clients a rewarding day and experience! Example: Conserving greed factors! River guide services wI3 -4 boats or more; split "river use to half fleet, rotating daily! Guide boats are out of control. There must be further restrictions. The fishing experience is very frustrating when the river is so congested. The river and the fish should available to Alaskans on a broader scale... Period. Guide issues are not a big deal on the Upper River because they are already limited and they are drift boat guides, who are different from powerboats guides). But there seem to be guide problems on the lower and middle rivers -just too many. I did a guided king trip and wanted out after a couple of hours. Trolling all day right next to dozens of other boats is not a great Alaskan fishing experience, even when you catch fish (and we got two in the boat that day). Keporz part 9b. Guides act like they own the river. They do what is needed to get their fish... Even if this means being rude or unsafe. I have had several bad experiences with guides. Guides are a bigger problem -this is business not necessarily pleasure. Guides use more force to get their clients results many don't live here so they don't really care about AK or preserving our resources Guides are a major source of an unpleasant experience. Their time should be limited or decrease the number of them on the river and you can do this by making it mandatory that to get a guide license, you have to be a resident of the state of Alaska! Guides are ruining the river! There are WAY too many, they are way too rude and aggressive. If there were no guides at all it would be a much better place!!!! Guides need to be limited. Weekends should only be for non- guides. Guides on the Kenai should be AK residents only! And if economics are still an issue, limit the number of guides who do not live on the Kenai peninsula. Guides should start at 1000 vs. 0600 Guides will catch 30% of all Kings when bait is used. This has a huge negative impact on the King returns. Harvest restrictions WILL result in decreased angler participation. A catch release fishery on king salmon will not see the same amount of anglers flocking to the river, and guided use will go down. 1 fished with two guides on the upper Kenai and Kasilof rivers. Both guides were very good and I saw some of the problems that unguided trips caused. It is a very tough problem and will be difficult to enforce as demand increases 1 have lot of opinions on this subject as well as the subject of sport fishing versus commercial fishing but this one statement sort of sums it all up: I believe that the most use of the river and the greatest accommodations for use and access of the riverlfish runs should go to first and foremost the Kenai Peninsula Resident (followed closely by the Alaskan Resident) who uses the river as a means to harvest salmon for himself and his family to eat/use (especially in these economic times). Those groups using the river /fish run as a source of income (guides /commercial fisherman /site seeing tours) should be given use, but should be the first ones to be restricted. As for the tourist, their priority for use should fall well below that of the Kenai Peninsula /Alaskan resident, but just above that of the "Source of income" users. I have never used a guide to hunt or fish. I believe in personal responsibility to follow fishing and hunting regulations and to protect the environment. I have often heard guides tell their clients that there WILL be unguided angler use restrictions on the river. As both a fishing guide business owner (Bristol Bay) and local Soldotna resident I find it very disturbing that a non resident guide expects restrictions on residents who live here in the area. I live here because of the recreational opportunities on the Kenai River in the fall. If there are use restrictions for locals 1 would most likely move from the area. I mentioned this before, but here is the problem. Guides don't stay in business unless they can regularly produce fish for their clients, Thus, their incentive to use the river is strongly dictated by economics. They want to catch as many fish out of the river as possible, with little regard for anyone else, except maybe another guide with whom they know personally. Thus, guides crowd the best fishing areas, have little regard for non- guided anglers, both fishing on the bank or boating in the river. Guides have no qualms or morals about pulling into a gravel bar you're fishing on, and spreading 4 -6 clients up and down the bar giving you maybe 20 -30 ft to fish. Then they go on down the river and 'High- grade" the next good area they know on the river. All day long guides are "high grading" the best fishing areas, and it makes no difference whether they are back trolling, drifting, or stopping on the shore to fish. When 10 -25 guides have gone in front of you, the fishing success for that hole or stretch of the river has been significantly compromised. Yes, a good fishermen can still catch a fish now and then (especially red salmon if they are moving through), but the success rate for kings, rainbows, and dolly's, is much, much lower in areas where guide density is high. Unfortunately guide density is high on almost every area of the river. know the guides are a powerful lobby and will resist every attempt to lower their numbers, but the Kenai river will always have crowding issues, with many contentious issues among fishermen, until the number of guides is reduced by 75% or more. The halibut and crab fishery went to limited entry for similar reasons. There was not enough resource available to split among an ever increasing number of commercial fishermen. The Kenai guiding industry has long passed this point. There are now so many guides, they are rushing to get to the good fishing areas before another guide gets there. Non- guided anglers are at a big disadvantage; they don't have the experience or gear to compete with the guides on a level playing field, and even the few non guided anglers who have a lot of experience find it tough to compete with the guides because they bully everyone out of the holes, and for most of us we end up going somewhere else, rather than fight with them over limited space in the good fishing places. I've been fishing this river since 1966, and I've seen the increase in guides and the evolution of the guiding the industry. You will not easily solve any of the crowding issues until you start restricting guiding activity. I'm taking a tot of time to answer this survey because I'm hopeful that someone will finally take on the guiding industry and make some needed changes. It will not be easy, it will be contentious, and it will be a political mud fight, but reducing the density of guides is the only way this issue has some change of being resolved and start the long road to return fishing on the river, to non guided folks, rather than handing it over to the guiding industry, where it is now. I think that "guided' boats should have a phone clearly visible on both sides of the boat for anyone to call the proper authorities to report them if they are not using the "rules" appropriately! Although, to be perfectly honest we didn't see any inappropriate behavior by any guides while we were bank fishing. I was impressed by their etiquette but I still think the phone on the side would be nice! I've lived here for 30 years, age 15 -45. I've worked in fish retail and commercial...now I own a boat and can't believe how many guides and how rude they are! Hard to take your family and compete for space. Maybe limit guides to just 2 -3 days per week, I would like to see a no guide day on the upper Kenai. One day a week, maybe in the middle of the week. If most guides lived on the KP 12 months per year, money paid to them would flow mostly into local businesses. But many guides are here only for the summer and contribute little to the local economy. In fact, they are parasites on the local economy, taking jobs away from locals. Increase nonresident guide license fees. Limit the total number of guide boats licensed. It appears to be the Non resident guides that create the biggest problem to Alaska residents. It is getting out of hand out there with the number of guides on the lower river. I understand the impact on the economy but at what price? This is the large majority of the problem the Kenai river is having. Period. I have personally seen it destroyed over the past 20 years because of the high numbers of guides out there, It's not mandatory to follow what all other boats are doing this is America and follow your needs on the river. It's simply an issue of greed. The Soldotna chamber of commerce would prefer the river be guided only. Guided fishing brings in more money to the area, via motels, restaurants, etc. Kenai peninsula residents should be the only ones allowed to guide on the Kenai river, or, no guides -no power boats would be best for the river... So is this survey and your job all about what's best for the city -state or what's best for the fish and river bank? Up the limit to 50hp ?,,,,geeeeez„ bad move!! Let them go out on 1 trip per day -not 2 as they do now. Limit number of guides and private users Local economic benefits is going to guides that are seasonal out of staters MANY guides are backtrolling in the Eagle Rock drift lanes this year. Some of these are slow to move out of the way and seem to be upset at users who are taking advantage of this traditional drift. Much conflict occurs between different guides on the river and between guides and unguided anglers, Reduce the number of out of state guides first. There is simply too much pressure on the guides to catch fish for their anglers for them to be courteous to other users on the river. My favorite day to fish is on Sunday and during the evenings expanding this regulation could create a happier balance too. Many of the guides believe they own the river -they don't. Unguided fishermen are leaving the river but guides treat therm as trespassers. Too many guides! Most guides on the river have been courteous at least, some downright helpful and friendly. To date I have not had a negative experience with a guide. Most of the fishing guides are from out of state. They come to the Kenai and capitalize off the Kenai's natural resources and then take their profits back with them to the lower 48. I grew up in Kenai, and my family has a motor boat for fishing on the Kenai. Fifteen years ago it was a pleasure to go out for the day fishing on the lower Kenai. Now, there are s0000 many guides that it takes away from the organic beauty of it all. My boat has been yelled out, numerous times, by guides trying to appease their clients. It has become an embarrassment to take out of town guests into that kind of chaos. The guides can be aggressive and not respectful of other boats. In my personal experience if you are not a guide boat you are a minority and that is who they are most disrespectful towards. I am not a resident of Alaska anymore, but still believe that first and foremost the locals should have priority of the river. Most of the locals eat their fish and save it for their family, vs. The guides who are looking for a trophy. I managed a fishing guide company for years when I lived in Soldotna, and thoroughly enjoyed the business fishing on the Kenai brought and it was always a pleasure to see how happy anglers were to catch their fish. While, I don't think it is necessary to 'take this away', I do think it is extremely important to regulate the access of guides on the river. Considering 1) they are looking for a trophy and not sustainable living 2) They utilize Kenai's resources and then take their profits back South, while leaving behind garbage and a ecological destruction for the locals to deal with (sometimes) 3) they do not seem to respect the locals substance needs, 4) IT IS JUST TOO OVER CROWDED to enjoy the true beauty and mysticism that the universe has provided in the Kenai. If we do not something to cherish it and implement changes now, it will not be there for our future generations. While this might not seem important to people that come to Alaska for 1 hot month of July to make it effects the local population tremendously. art My experience is that most guides (if they don't know you) are a_holes, t think if you want to make rules have a complaint department and investigate all complaints if you have 3 legitimate complaints you get banned from the river for a calendar year. On all fronts, over and misuse are changing the river, I would suggest all who "need' the river to make a living, find additional income source. On the upper river guides will stack boats at Jim's landing take out and just stand around and talk about the day's fishing, I have seen this with my own eyes. I have seen it lead to an almost armed confrontation. Bing's Landing is a little better, except for the parking issue. The lower lot should be for vehicles with trailer combo only. Our trip was with an extremely courteous guide. Obviously the bad behavior of a few, both guided and un- guided, has an impact on the experience of everyone. MOST importantly I would NOT want to see a permit system that favors commercial guides, as has happened so much on other rivers in the lower 48. It is almost impossible to get a private permit to raft some rivers, so the guided trips become the only option. Overall use is more of an issue than guided or unguided use. if too many people are on the river for anyone to have a reasonable experience then measures have to be made to address the cause. If permits have to be issued then that may be where we are heading but today I am not in favor. Pass regulations that equate guided fishing with commercial fishing. After all, that's what it is. Reduce reduce reduce reduce &ifmmi Resident vs. Nonresident Rules of the road are not practiced by guides. My friends (guides) tell me that at the "guide academy" they are taught rules of the road do not apply on the Kenai River! Seems to me that there are too many guides on the river, particularly the lower section. Some guides are professional and respectful, but many seem to believe they own the river and don't think twice about zipping ten feet away from twenty bank fisherman and blasting them with a two and a half foot wake simply to get where they are going a little quicker. Other times they will race up less than a boat length below a non -guide boat and "low hole" without any remorse, One other significant abuse I witnessed was the "no- guide" day of Sunday. I witnessed several guides dropping off or picking up clients at local boat ramps. It was painfully obvious that they were not simply fishing with friends since they didn't know any of the clients' names. One guide even went too far as quietly reminding some clients that they need to remember that they are old friends should anyone ask. When one client started asking about payment the guide quickly reminded them to wait until later!! Clearly better enforcement is necessary. State residency should be a requirement to guide on the Kenai. It would potentially reduce the number of guides on the river, keep more money in state and provide some level of local employment for the Peninsula. The amount of guides is out of control, The guides that come up for the final 2 weeks of July from out of state and then act as if they own the river is ridiculous. AS a collective they are ruining the fishery and have already ruined the quality of the trip. I have had numerous run ins with guides due to their rudeness. This summer I got yelled at by a guide who said I was in his spot at the centennial launch. It was a scene to say the least because I didn't back down. These guides need to be monitored by state parks or somebody and not allowed to launch at 330 AM and take up spots at the launch that early. It is ridiculous, out of control and somebody is eventually going to get hurt, The entire system (river and social) lose when commercial considerations over power ecological considerations. Less traffic, traffic free days, noise free days and less power boating in general are probably healthy for this river. The fish come first, let the guides get a real job, I did. The guides know how to handle a boat and without them the economical impact to the area would be substantial The issue I see is with guided use is certain boats. A complain line or a "Better Guide Business Bureau" is you will, for certain guides that don't respect non guided users. The guided boats that are still in business despite bad reputations are because they book clients from out of state, If there was a rating that an out of state client could review this would minimize certain guided power boats from dominating river use. The number of guided boats adds up when you consider they are on the water every day of the season. The condition of the fish that were caught was of some concern. I,e,: cuts, damaged jaws The only guide if any should live here year around and not just have a post office box and a temp driver lic They should also have only one boat per lic. Not 2,4,6,8. That's bull The only problems that I ever had over the last three years going down is with guide boats. There are way too many on the river and they act as if they own the river and people out there for personal use and family time don't matter. They are rude and only care about making money The real issue is the last 2 -2 1/2 weeks of July -too many guides just show up. Opportunity guides who strictly fish those last weeks. 70 >fi The state should be diligent in assuring that guides meet all requirements for guiding. There seems to be a proliferation of guides. The tremendous increase in guide boats has driven many local users from the river, Their boats are large. Many of them behave rudely toward unguided local users. The wording of some of these questions raises a concern regarding the validity of this survey design. In many cases, the questions appear to presuppose a problem with crowding and slant to specific outcome (impacts reductions are needed). There are inconsiderate users on both sides of the guided versus unguided issues. It has been my experience that guided watercraft numbers are through the roof during July and back off to a tolerable and even enjoyable level throughout the rest of the year. There are simply too many guides. Hopefully the tough economy will drive about half of them off the river! There are too many guides There are too many out of state guides There are way too many guides on the river residents can't even fish the lower river 3 days a week is plenty for these mostly nonresident guides Too many guide boats Too many guides!!! Way too many guides and most are from out of state not good guides feel they get to fish however they want some haven't a clue We fish the river before the guides start and after they finish. So we have no problems with them We should tax the crap out of state guides, allowing more locals Other comments about private development or visual impacts of development "All" personal property development should "meet" a certain "quality grade" visual /safety requirement!! A boardwalk over a grassy bank isn't creating habitat it is just maintaining current levels, stumps and brush slow the water and allow bugs to grow and smolt to hide from the birds A lot of the development on lower, middle that does exist is a mess. Keep it the same level, but clean it up. As long as it is built right I've got no problem As with anything else that involves regulation, it doesn't matter because lack of enforcement is just as bad as no regulations. Develop the river that's what it's for, I'm sure there are a few of us that would still enjoy the river even if no fish were in it. Developing /improving (erosion control and porta potty at road side) fishing areas around the roadside pullouts along the river, and adding day use fees would reduce the pressure on high use areas. Also allow users to escape crowds. Developments such as Poachers Cove, Kenai Keys, River Quest, are an insult to our intelligence. Don't over develop your lakes and rivers like the lower 48 wild Alaska is why I came and why I will return Enforcement of permitting appears to lake teeth. Wealthy individuals continue to act first, ask forgiveness later and get away with it. Erosion control should be encouraged at private and public locations. This would greatly reduce boat wake issues and trampling of some shore areas Erosion is from motor boats, get rid of them, get rid of problems Few resources available -too restrictive for bank restoration permits. Only a few can afford I am a non resident that cannot truly know these issues spending a few days on the river I believe a property owner should have the right to develop their property. I believe removable floating docks should be used more often during development. I believe home owners on the river or "private" parties holding lands have the right to develop the properties as they see fit. But this development must maintain the integrity and productivity of the Kenai River. I disagree with allowing any type of private docks or boardwalks I have not boated the entire river I see way too many docks and boardwalks that will no doubt end up in the river from annual flooding, I also see structures such as cabins and out buildings that are also, no doubt destined for the river from natural meandering of the river. We cannot allow this to continue. I strongly support less development. More development will only lead to more development and then eventually destroy the entire environment of the Kenai. I understand individuals can't stop progress but is developing these areas really progress can't we keep it more natural more conducive to ecological growth and future ability to show our descendents what this earth was like and should be? I want to see the Upper Kenai completely free of development. 1 wish that the state of AK would spend its restoration money on buying all of the riverfront properties that come up for sale. Protect all of the watershed If one doesn't exist specific development rags. Should be created for the Kenai River updated as needed to address growth, sewage etc. if you are not fishing photographers /videographers and other non fishing person's should not be restricted If you take the chance to build on the river don't expect the tax payers to bail you out every 20 years when the floods hits! If you're going to close off areas of the bank for erosion control, then you need to open up new areas of the bank to reduce the crowding. I'm not familiar with existing permit requirements, but as an architect, I typically side with property owner's rights. I see far too much unnecessary regulation, poorly administrated In those areas where additional bank improvement is needed to affect/limit bank erosion, overall private development should be increased. it is stupid that there is no development allowed how very stupid It's another way for government to dictate to its citizens what when where to do with their land and not have to pay the bills for the land. Either purchase my property or shut up. Just try to keep it nice. i would limit the amount of people fishing in each park, but have more alternatives to suggest to folks who get there too late or have to be turned away. Have communication between the various parks where they could call up another park and guarantee folks a spot if they drove over there. I work days usually 10 -12 hrs during salmon runs. I fish with the tide on Kenai and crooked creek, It makes it bad when its crowded. 1 still have to work the next day. And to have an old -timer spot for us local guys. No wake rule On the existing private property along the Kenai River, the Cost Share program and the Kenai River Center have been extremely effective in educating property owners about protecting and restoring fish habitat. Structures that protect and restore fish habitat are "development" The focus of this question is off base the focus should be on protecting and restoring fish habitat docks, boardwalks and erosion control structures can be done in a fish habitat friendly manner that should be the focus of this question are things fish habitat friendly or not. Development in and of itself is a neutral issue it can be done in a positive manner or a negative manner. And the efforts over the last decade have been very successful in installing fish habitat friendly structures this should remain the focus of protection and restoration efforts for fish habitat. Property owners should be able to develop their property. Reduce development in ALL riparian areas! Shoreline development doesn't matter as long as habitat isn't destroyed. However, permitting agencies such as the CUE and EPA should work proactively with landowners to properly permit and develop shorelines. Should be able to use more permanent means to protect river bank, in combination with natural barriers. Band erosion big problem. Should not be developed anymore! Leave it to nature as it should be! 1st trip The Kenai is a special river and the decisions we make today about development on it will be our legacy we should be very conservative about what we allow. The Kenai should be protected from uncontrolled development. The last question is poorly worded. The existing system doesn't work, Massive homes built right up to the bank? That's crazy I can't even do that in Anchorage where I own land along a tiny portion of Little Campbell creek. The buffer needs to be increased and huge docks and houses too close to the shoreline need to be moved. The requirements for docks should not keep changing and expect homeowners to pay for the changes. The River Center does an excellent job re: development. This is policed by ADFG and USFWS; they follow up on development to make sure it is done in accordance with permitting The state should buy as much riverfront as possible to make it public land. There is no enforcement of some of the regulations regarding development. I see a LOT of 'modifications" made during the off season, and there are no consequences. Too many guides Too many guides. If people want to develop their own property they should be allowed. This is not what is destroying the river. Fish don't care about walkways Too many new subdivisions. This will eventually kill the river (or at least damage it). r 200 With all this restoration you would think we would see a positive impact, higher fish #'s, but have we seen this? Zoning and lot size etc are issues that have already become a problem. Fishing platforms and development of one's property to utilize the banks for fishing in a less harmful way should be paramount. Other comments about Lower River actions A drift boat haul out only is needed between the pastures and the bridge. All guides should have to be Alaska residents year round At pillars build a lot for vehicles without trailers, enforce distinction Ban power boats on the Kenai Decrease number of guides Decrease number of guides Don't change guide times on the river. On the few times we do powerboat fish on the lower Kenai, we fish at 3 or 4am or late in the evening to avoid the guides. If you stagger guide times, we lose that non -guide slot. Drift boat only Drift only. 2417 all year Either open it up or shut it down. Enforce the no anchor in June or July rule for safety Focus on the environment Guided/unguided, has to be controlled!! Guides are a business -have them contribute higher for use fees I believe number of guide boats should be reduced in July. Not sure about fairest or most equitable way to accomplish this. I would hate to see a scheme that would cause us to fish less. As it is, we do not get out on the river as much as we would like due to work commitments. It's important to remember that many anglers are working people who live in AK. If you were to reduce both guided and unguided boats on the river, the guides would take over as they do this for a living and they have time to commit to 'figuring' out ways of getting reservations. Locals are busy making a living by working regular jobs around the Peninsula and see their fishing as a 'break' and it is for pleasure. If you start putting restrictions on both parties, the majority will win: guides. And fishing on the Kenai will no longer be fun and enjoyable for locals, Increase the lst run with limited hatchery fish (from Kenai stock) to increase use over June. Institute a Kenai King Salmon stamp to help defer costs Limit all fishing to 16hrslday Limit number of guides to current number Many guide boats two shifts of people out one in the morning and one in the afternoon, as well as some after 6 when they are not supposed to be out. That should be looked into. I feel the main issue is the number of guide boats; there are really not much out there for personal use and many can only get on the river after 6 and on the weekend, More access for bank fishermen (and women). More resident only days in June and July No guidesEiIiil Open the river to resident only use on Saturday or Sunday Two decades of ignoring public access issues on the lower river is showing. You made July sound like a nut house Ban all motorized boats in the rivers except for law enforcement and game wardens Charge a seasonal use fee and put it into better public access Cunningham was willed as a park for kids not a boat launch for assholes. Decrease number of guides Decrease number of guides Drift only river everydayiiiiiIi Give residents a break in fees I will stick to slivers in September Issue guide license as one retires Locals (of lesser income, are being weeded out. More enforcement of current regulations No deep V boats. This causes more wake and bank issues than the size of the motor No guides Open more of the river to bank fishing or platform fishing no more closing parts of the river that were once open all river that was closed if trails platforms are put in this is real if we lose the tourists what will become of are Peninsula? Other recommended Lower River boat capacities 1 trip per day with guides being limited to 2 boats registered to them. Also, guides and permit holders should be Alaska Residents only. Based on the previous question possibly half of the boats are guides! Fewer guides would help all the users enjoy the river Less than 50 No guides The lower number the better and especially less motors —or none at all Drift boat only This is only based on the info I received from this survey. Too many guides Other comments about Middle River actions Barbless hooks when fishing Decrease number of guides Drift only, 24/7 all year Educate the guides and require testing and monitoring to promote long term preservation Establish limited entry for guides on middle river. Allow maybe 25 guides and have them bid on limited entry permits to use the river. Once purchased permits can be sold on open market limited entry salmon permits. I am a non resident fisherman that fishes with a guide one or two days per year I have only fished it once. If you are a resident of Alaska you should be able to use the river at any time. The use of middle river is pretty bad at Bings and should be limited as well as the joke on the lower river Just get rid of the guides and most problems will be solved. Just more enforcement on existing rules Limit speeds of motorized boats Limit the guided boats to a reservation system. Make more area available to bank fisherman for red runs that travel to them by boat. l.e. Floating docks Marked 3 and 4 for all response actions. No guides!!!!!! No more power boats Open 3rd hole to catch and release kings Open up a few more camp grounds up and down the river so as to spread out the population of anglers a little more Protect the rainbow so the middle doesn't end up like the upper Resident vs. Nonresident Restrict fishing hours to 16 /day Speed limits, we have been almost run over several times, folks just don't care about their wakes Too many guides in august and September limit them. Turbidity excess "wash" not a big issue Comment "I very seldom fish that far up!" Decrease number of guides Guides should be AK residents Having law enforcement act on valid complaints No guides i Voluntary clean up of shore line and river as well as related woodsfl Other comments about Upper River actions A few more signs along the river banks reminding the anglers to throw their carcasses into the current might be helpful! Additional takeout at outlet to lake (hidden creek trail area). Additional, well signed parking and trailhead access. As a long -time resident of the peninsula, I hate the idea of a reservation system that limits my access. But...in reality, I guess I might have to give this more thought. Better educate boater taking out of Jim's landing, Use new area at entrance to secure boat. Boat accessible outhouses and require removal of all human waste, feces and tp for all users Close the Russian to fishing at night to allow the bears some alone time on the river, l l pm to Sam Cost of ferry to high for one way /how much is used for river -bank repair? Create a no fishing zone of 100 yards+ where the mouth of the Russian river meets the Kenai when the sanctuary opens up. Do your job, hire more enforcement officers Enforce the disabled/limited mobility /no wading area of Russian crossing Establish Sunday, Mondays, and Fridays as no guide days Expand Jim's landing to the big slack water pool above the rock and bank erosion measures after an environmental impact study Fix Jim's landing ramp system Guides reserve for the season which makes it difficult for non regular users to get sites. Have more cleaning tables w/ manual meat grinder to dispose of carcasses from river Human waste I don't fish there so i realty don't know the problem at the Russian river area I don't think camping on the river is necessary. I oppose it. Nothing is worse than getting up earlier than anybody, being the first one on the water, old school style, and come down the back channel at 90 degree corner and see tent city. These people think they have the prime hole on lockdown just because they are sleeping, guess again. When they hear us hosing fish in front of the tent and wake up and come out all cranky and ready to argue and start trouble. Sometimes the same camp is left set up for a week or more, and the people leave and go home and go to work and then come back a week later, buy a cabin somewhere man. I think trying to manage the carcasses takes food for the trout and doily's out of the river 1 think reservation systems for camping sites work best when some are left for first -come as well. 1 want less private boaters, but I live in cooper and want to float after work when I want. if a reservation system is adopted it should limit the number of days in advance you can reserve a spot. If current chop rules were enforced bear attraction would be reduced Improve launch /take -out at Jim's landing Improve the take out at Jim's landing to accommodate more boats Increase enforcement contacts; better mgmt oversight of contractor operating the campground. Increase violations fees for violators Instead of tossing carcasses from banks of the Russian back into the Russian, move them downstream to sloughs that receive little use by people. Bears feeding there won't feed as much near anglers. Kill the bears. Leave the unguided anglers alone there is no problem on this stretch Limit guides on upper river to 10 -25 and have them bid on "limited entry use permits Once permits have been purchased they can be sold on open market similar to limited entry salmon permits. Limited hunting of the bears would solve the problem Lower the limit on guided trips Maintain limits of 3 fish or fewer per day. Raising limits decreases turnover and crowds up the river. Make it fishing by ask residents only. Let the tourists and crowds have the lower section. More cleaning tables in the Russian Kenai river area More fish cleaning stations at the Russian river confluence More overall enforcement; would like to see enforcement officers present on river and at boat launches more often than just weekends in July. No fishing at night in high bear areas. No guideslmmmr Open it up let us use it. Or stop charging us for the little dab you do. Outlaw pontoon boats. Pave Skilak lake road will reduce maintenance costs on the road, vehicles, and trailers. Pave Skilak loop road Please look at alternative to those now being enforced which limit cleaning tables. Please...let us work together...fisherman and bears, close the Russian from 11pm to 6 am every day. The bears would learn this and we would have fewer altercations every year, there is no reason for fisherman to be in this area after 11 :DOpm. Post general courtesy rules where everyone can see them. Provide "grinders" at cleaning stations Reduce current number of guides Reduce guide boats Reduce number of fish allowed in Russian river area Reduce number of guide boats extremely important Relocate the bears ones they get to used to the river and people, before a conflict Restrooms /porta pottys on the far bank at the Russian Skilak road should be paved asap The bears are a great part of the fishing adventure The bears belong there and if it bothers the anglers ...they should stay home, carcasses need to go back into the river i.e. The eco system! There are more people per square mile at the Russian right now than there are in my neighborhood in anchorage issue permits to hunters to harvest the bears and get them away from the people!!! This is people hole; manage it for people not bears. This would only help the non resident and as it is now AK residents have a hard time finding a camp spot. To take his family fishing after working all week and driving to the river on Friday evening. Throw the carcasses in hoper then grind them twice a day Upper river Kenai boating licenses to weed out the insecure novices who struggle with river flow and how to handle drift boats and rafts. Use of barb!ess hooks when fishing Work with fish and game to reduce red salmon limit on upper river. Reduces bear attractants in the form of additional carcasses and increases resource. Better signage and directions to a more organized trail system Encourage a hunting season like we used to have and our bear problems will be over. Hire river keepers to monitor sections I thick the Park Service is negligent when they allow bears to maul people in the most popular river in the state. If a dog did what the bears are doing it would be put to sleep and the owner fined /jailed. Kill more bears. Like the human waste system on the slope Limit number of people allowed in Confluence area, (especially during the night) Limit unguided boat numbers in July and September on Sundays and Mondays Many fishermen value their catch and want to prepare the meat for eating and freezing before their long drives home More law enforcement, More game wardens and large fines for littering poaching! No guidesiiiii Requiring people to leave paid access sites who disobey rules. Open additional parking sites on the highway!! Should be able to make reservations the day before. Three days out or first come is hard to be spontaneous, Stop Chop and Throw keep it up. Carcasses are important to be put back in the river. Taking the whole fish to the campgrounds, means leaving a trail of fish blood to the sites or garbage cans Traffic backed up on highway during peak season around ferry a hazard Try somehow to soften the fly fishing only area on mouth hooked reds, some fish are caught numbers of Tim's and thrown back later dying and not being even able to spawn or be taken by angler, I think anyone purposely caught trying to snag should have license taken Additional general comments for those with multiple comments) 1. Add more drift days or make all days drift only! 2. Reduce guides, way too many. Fish first, money /politics second. 3. Spread out the guide business, maybe they will wonder off and find a different way to make a living. I did, so I know it is not impossible. 5 years ago, my children and I fished at Morgan's landing. It was crowded but very friendly, most of the "men" was respectful of each other space. This year I was surprise that is was almost empty. I realized that all the platforms was new and not functional at all. I heard that the ice broke the old ones, I guess Morgan's Landing become a less popular area because of the new management. I'm wondering which kind of platforms could be built However, for my family, it was great. We adjust to the new platform, find some good spot and came back home with a lot of red salmons. But if I was a resident, I will certainly be disappointed of the platforms at Morgan's Landing and money spent. Thank you and see you next year! Adding one or possibly two more days of drift, no motor fishing will make every fishers experience a bit better. it will be a quieter and safer experience with less boat conflicts. Alaska residents should realize that visitors from the lower 48 and from all over the world for that matter bring revenue to all of Alaska for fishing and sightseeing. Putting any type of harsh restrictions that affect tourism would probably not help the already rising controversy over management principles. Are tourists important to Alaska? Or are there enough residents that feel like they are special, like Texans All my trips to Alaska have been great. I really have no negatives about your great state. The only problem I've had was with some guides. Some not very friendly, quick to criticize. If anything, require human relations class for all guides. All though it provides revenue nonresidents are a problem not respecting our wonderful area Any consideration given to lowering hp. Or use of Kenai river when, like this year we had such higher water levels? New area on my property have been eroded /washed because of high boat traffic and not staying in middle of river. What about handicapped people- new access? If you believe only drift boats are used on the Kenai River every Monday, especially in July, you haven't been here! Guides still use drift boats/personal craft on "non guided" days. There is boat traffic almost every hour of the day and much of it is by guides for profit. I am a disappointed resident that lives on the Kenai river it is obvious to me that recreational fisherman have little ability to impact things compared to the guide business. Come visit next summer, my address is My residence overlooks the Kenai river from a high bluff about rm13 -14. (July is the best to view the circus.) I will provide the popcorn! As a visitor to the area, I am not certain I can give valid arguments to support my answers. The guides I have used are confided about the various strategies to work with the Kenai recreation area. Their comments about management makes me concerned that not all who monitor the area have the same goals and some are just not capable of maintaining a clear view of the future. As an out of state person visiting for several months, if I had known that every fishing experience would be combat fishing I wouldn't have spent the several hundred dollars on a fishing license L' d earlier, I have f L d the River for many years As mentionedCcI rIICI, I fished file Kenai RIVC! IVi I{Idlly yCd3S (mostly privately, but with one 8 years stretch as a powerboat guide) and have greatly enjoyed the opportunity. I normally fish from early/mid may through late October /early November. I can understand why some people feel the river is too crowded and have limited the fishing trips, or totally curtailed them, but I truly believe most of that is caused by their unwillingness to adapt to differences on the river. Also, as in most human interactions, it is way too easy to pick a 'scapegoat" and try to lay the blame on it/them versus accepting the blame ourselves. 1 do support adding additional facilities (launches, restrooms, boat tie up areas, fish cleaning facilities, etc.) Where possible /practical as this typically reduces a lot of the running up and down the river, time delays at the launches, etc. And encourages people to try other sections of the river, thus spreading out the load. Bear hunting should be considered to help limit the number of bears and bear encounters in the upper river area. I have seen and had more close bear encounters each of the last 3 years than in my previous 27 years of fishing the river combined. Being from Minnesota it has helped me to talk to the local wildlife management professionals to educate myself on the right way to fish and hike in Alaska. I did this by seeking out these professionals. Visitors need an easy way to access these people and these people should reach out more to educate the visitors. My first year fishing at the mouth of the Russian I say the Game and Fish guy every day and he was great. This year I never saw anyone. For non residents you should create an online training video that is required to be completed before a fishing license can be issued. Florida does this for younger boaters. Bitte machen sie nicht mehr verbote,und sperren sie nicht mehr uferzohnen. ich hoffe auch das man weiterhin keine priifung machen muss,das man mit einem boat auf dem Kenai fahren darf.wir europaer schatzen die freiheit in Alaska sehr. [Rough translation: Please do not prohibit. I hope you continue to not make fishermen pass a test to drive a boat on the Kenai. We Europeans appreciate the freedom in Alaska.] Boats on Lower River cause of bank erosion more than fisherman. Fish cleaning station at Big Eddy Can I have a T- shirt? My problem with power boats is that they are mad about Mondays so they are rude to drifters. On Mondays they come way too close all of the time. They do it to wash us out with their wake. Why are they even on the river? There are groups of them that come out every Monday just to buzz the boats. They have the whole river to travel and they get as close as they can to us. This really pisses me offrrr!rri Charge a $10 use fee for Kenai fishing. Use the proceeds to purchase strategically located commercial fishing sites that choke off fish entering the river. Clean up and improve existing campgrounds. Have more enforcement people during red season, too many people snag and keep fish that is number 1 on my list. Conduct of implementing emergency orders during peak fishing seasons tells us how crocked Alaska Fish and Parks dept is. We won't be coming back! Crack Down on red snaggers Distribution of fisherman between commercial and sport fishermen is very much lopsided in favor of commercial fishermen. The river would offer a much better experience if this issue were addressed at the same time as other issues in the survey, Do something about the number of boats on the river guided and unguided from 6 -15 to 8 -15. Use more drift boats! I guide fly out fishing on the Alaska Peninsula. Each year the negative comments about traffic on the Kenai increases. During "RED season: 1, Anglers should keep and fish landed 2. A system to record all daily catches, to avoid double limits on the same day. Education and enforcement are key. I've seen a lot of bad behavior at Cooper Landing boat launch with commercial boats being put in the water and then abandoned for hours, They get in the way of people that are actively launching. Also, there is a conflict on boat launch fees at Cooper Landing. According to DNR in Anchorage, rafts not launched from trailers pay no launch fee but volunteer hosts and one ranger say we have to pay. Season pass must be put on trailer but without a trailer, I can't use a season pass. I but a season parking pass and that should be sufficient. Camp host claimed we had to pay a ramp fee which in regulations doesn't exist. Let's get DNR administration and enforcement entities on the same "sheet of music At current usage, even during peak fish runs, there's enough room for everyone. It's a few bad apples that play games and cause problems. More rangers on the river to put them in their place for unsportsmanlike behavior would go a long way to making every float trip a pleasurable one. Also (2), the beach just down river from the landing at Jim's Landing was being used by fishermen when rafts are attempting to land. This caused major conflicts. That entire area should be zero fishing and it should be enforced. There is room for fishing 200 yards down from Jim's Landing that can be used by people that walk in. Also (3), the parking area at Jim's needs to be expanded. Set up some spots for 2 hour parking and tow offenders. There seem to be plenty of spots for cars with trailers but 8 hour parking for just cars and trucks is hard to get at peak fishing times, (We ferry a car to Jim's before launching from Cooper Landing.) Thank you for this opportunity to share my experiences and frustrations, Even though I had seen pictures and read descriptions about 'combat fishing' on the Russian River my wife and 1 were absolutely appalled by the behaviors of some fishermen. Probably 90% of the fishermen (and women) were very courteous to one another but there were so many people that the poorly behaved 10% made quite an impact. I've been a sportsman all my life and realize you really have your hands full on this one. If it were me, I would first emphasize that most anglers are courteous and that leads to a good experience and then try to modify the behavior of the 10% that are hell bent to catch fish and will do anything to try to accomplish that goal. It would be tough and expensive, but perhaps people could be hired to patrol the river during the peak periods and they could gently guide (model) appropriate behaviors when they see infractions. Good lucid Expand and develop the Russian River Campground. I wrote a paper for a public works project and my focus was the inability to accommodate the number of people that use the facility during peak fishing season. There needs to be two entrances, the traffic backs up to the highway and becomes a hazard. Also inside the park could be expanded so more people could park and camp. It's not fair that tourists can go online and reserve the camp sites and locals get turned away. Folks living in Alaska need to start picking up their trash and not leaving in campgrounds and back country or else it will look like cal. and lately now Oregon. You have the most beautiful state in the USA and hate to see it ruined, For the most part, I support the initiative to remove the fish cleaning stations from upstream in the Russian River, however, taking all those stations out, and putting two tables at the confluence was one of the bonehead moves of all time. You cannot expect 2000 people to share two tables. I don't have a degree and I can figure that one out. You people are the experts but you need to start thinking like the people who you support. Put those advanced degrees to good use and start using your heads for something besides a hatrack. I'm not trying to be humorous. Those people who use the river depend on you to be intelligent and to make decisions that are beneficial to them. Having a dozen fish cleaning tables is not going to create a serious impact on the river and it is going to be a serious benefit to the people who use the river. Additionally, think about creating a group of trained, yes trained, volunteers to help manage the river. These people could work with officers to help identify offenders who are violating the laws and contact officers via radio or phone to respond to deal with lawbreakers. Officers can't be everywhere at once and they can only deal with those violators who they actually see breaking the law. Wouldn't hurt to put them in plain clothes as well. Everyone goes the speed limit when they see a police car. Put your officers in plain clothes and let them walk the bank among the fisherman. They'll have a much better chance of spotting violations that way. Thank you for your time. For the Russian River area, I am concerned with the lack of enforcement and the number of people that were violating game laws. There were only a few, but I wasn't the only one to notice. The aggressive fishing actions of anglers put off my father who visited the river to fish for 2 days. Land use is important, but I believe that it will be hard to enforce. As far as boating goes, I have only been on the river in a boat twice since I moved up here almost 5 years ago. Something needs to be done to address the issue, what that is, I don't know. FYI -My husband and 1 are new to Alaska. We moved here the beginning of July 2009, but have red and silver salmon fished several times. Good luck. Don't over manage or make more bureaucracy. Spend money to continue to improve the river -bank fishing. Thank you. Greetings- I don't know how valid my survey is, I was a visitor to Alaska and had hired a guide with a drift boat to take me fly fishing for one day on the Middle Kenai. It was around the 3rd week in June 2009 and the river was not crowded at all. Many of the issues in your survey are very important, but being a one time visitor I cannot really judge what action should or should not be taken on a particular issue as I did not experience most or all of these issues on my one day visit to the river. Thank You! Guides are destroying the fishery. Releasing a king after a 30 minute fight by an inexperienced angler does not in any way mean that fish has the energy to continue to its spawning beds and reproduce. Its silly to think otherwise. These guides think they are the keepers of the river by releasing fish, They DESTROY the fishing experience for ALL non guided anglers. Guides need to be limited- especially July. Long -term fishery mgmt. and quality of the fishery need to be the goals. Guides often tie up the best spots through networking and space out their clients so that others can't land their boats, Guide boats keep getting bigger so you need to also limit number of clients upper river only. Also release all trout and char immediately. Have been fishing all over Alaska for more than 25 yrs. I no longer fish the lower middle Kenai river because of the crowding and number of power boats both private and guided. On the rare occasions I fished there in the past it was on no motor days. Skilak and Kenai Lake fishing should be promoted to relieve some of the pressure on the river. Having been bank fishing person for many years, I have seen many changes: The need for more bank fishing areas; too much over crowding during peak seasons. A boat going up or down river creates huge wakes against the banks causing more damage than many bank fishing persons. A lot of fisher bank persons have only a few days to fish. After paying for a fishing license and a parking space (fees) do not like to spend hours waiting for a chance to fish. I am a disabled vet, and "I" appreciate places such as Centennial Park and Swift Water for the easy "short" walking access L "waters E' bank d_ €1. "Y' to the wafers edge. Either by bane auLes� or riianrilaue walkways. Thank you COW €ei €t t pays 12 regarding fees: The State "Greed Need" has to stop too! No Morel I am a visitor but own land between Kenai and Soldotna -we stay in a camper trailer now. We are in the process of building in Alaska. I am glad that you are trying to head off overuse of the Kenai water shed tough job. The biggest concern I have is over- development of the banks by property owners. I strongly fear that much of the dockage and debris that people distribute to access the river and control bank erosion will end up in the river, The river belongs to all of us and more needs to be done to limit what property owners can build near the banks. Many of the properties I see for sale along the Middle are clearly in the path of advancing erosion. As for crowing, I do not feel it as I use the river from catarafts. If I do feel it, I know there is another stretch of the river to fish, just around the corner. I also know there are a whole lot of other rivers in Alaska that I have not fished yet. I am mostly concerned about the King fishing, The number of large fish has gradually decreased over the last 25 years, as fishing pressure has increased mostly from guides in my opinion. I am not a resident of Alaska now, but did live in Alaska for 19 yrs. (1987 -2006) I am against any boat (guided or unguided) restrictions. I am against any additional user fees or quotas /permits to limit river access. Please, no boardwalks at Bings Landing. Unless this will open areas now closed to fishing. Leave Naptowne Rapids hole as is. Only improvements may be bank enhancement, but no boardwalks. I witnessed hourly/daily different user groups coexisting /cooperating. I also witness same type users working well together, 1 netted many fish for people and had people netting fish for me as well. All in all the bank fisherman work very well together and self manage the space on the river. No more government control is needed. The fishery is not broken, so, don't fix it! Don't over manage the river Thanks I am not sure that I have enough Kenai river fishing experience to be a good survey responder, I fished float fished the upper Kenai for 5 days in august 2009 and waded the Russian and its entrance into the Kenai for a couple of days in July 1„ October 2007, I fished with an experienced anchorage resident, who is not a guide both time. I do have a lot of concerns about maintenance of habitat and fishing populations. 1 am probably not a good choice for this information. I took a drift ride on the lower river, about 2 -3 hours long. Only time on river, so 1 really have little background. Perhaps the questionnaire should have asked about this so answers could be weighted. I am really quite concerned that this survey will be use to further restrict access and use of the Kenai River. Obviously, there are problems with overcrowding at times, but Alaskans should ultimately not take the hit of the reductions in use. Not to say guides should take it all, but most. Toilets are my biggest concerns and their locations. Trash on the river is inexcusable and I would be agreeable to $100 fine for littering. Registering or permitting daily floats I am strongly opposed to. I answered about half of the survey in one sitting. When I went back to complete the survey, I was unable to pick up where I left off. So, I think I did 2 half surveys instead of one whole one. [Survey note: We were able to match the two surveys and code them as one]. Also wrote a letter in June, but did not send it: 1 fished the Russian River sanctuary on Tuesday, June 16. The limit was 3 fish. The fishing was absolutely spectacular! There was rapid angler turnover. Folks would arrive, catch 3, and leave. There was plenty of room. What a great experience. The next day the limit was raised to 6. What a difference. There was very little angler turnover. Folks would arrive and stay. It got more and more crowded. I landed a fish and, when I turned back to the river to resume my efforts, I found my space taken by 2 new anglers. After a few hours of trying to get back to fishing, I gave up. I left with just my 1 fish. I guess l'm just not aggressive enough to wedge myself into the crowded line. Over in the parking area I found the lot was jammed full. The line was out to the road and causing hazardous traffic conditions on the Sterling Highway. As I left, I saw several illegally parked cars along the road creating further hazards. Please consider not raising the limit when strong returns invite such action. Yes, more fish may be harvested when the limit is raised. But the overall recreation experience changes from great fun to crowded and testy. On Tuesday anglers were helpful and patient. They would move out of the way so you could play a fish, and help you net it. On Wednesday, they were aggressive, impatient, and sometimes even angry. Thank you 1 appreciate ail the hard work and dedication on Alaska's river management program! It was an amazing place and you should be very proud of the job you are doing! 1 appreciate the opportunity to comment. The main issue I have dealt with is too many guides on the lower river from the third week in June to the end of July. If we can't limit them altogether, their time on the river should be limited to an 8 hour work day. They can still run two shifts per day, 4 hours each. Or, limit them to one 8 hour service. There would be many supportive spouses... I'm betting. Also, wouldn't we see economic prosperity in the purchase of equipment, tackle, and rental boats if there were less guided hours on the river? I'm sure this idea has been floated before, but it truly is the best option for all concerned. Thanks I appreciate the opportunity to share my opinions on how to maintain and improve this fishery. Please keep up the good work! o I appreciate the opportunity to take this survey. I think that management of the river is extremely important overall and appreciate the efforts undertaken so far by all concerned. In particular the Kenai River Guide Academy has been a success. However, I absolutely support a limit on the number of guides. Guide license #600 has been issued. How many guides are enough? Reducing the number will take significant traffic (possibly half according to the survey) off the river with the associated benefits and increase revenue for those that remain. Also, the river needs more public launch ramps on the Funny River /K -Beach side as there are very few. Additional restrooms, strategically placed, would also cut down on the traffic transiting between their fishing spot and the closest facility. Thanks again for allowing me to participate. I believe the biggest problems on the river were not addressed by this survey. I observed people leaving trash along the river (food containers as well as fishing gear) as well as illegally taking salmon. No one seems to be patrolling to enforce existing regulations. It is my opinion that existing regulations need to be enforced before adding new ones. O I believe strongly that dipnetters should not be allowed to clog the parking areas and boat launches. They speed downstream causing huge wakes and affecting the banks and fisherman. They should be required to launch below the Ames bridge. I believe the best way to alleviate overcrowding on the lower Kenai is first to limit the number of guides and second to limit that number of guides to mainly drift boat fishing only. I believe the regulation change already proposed to allow anglers to keep snagged fish in the Russian river area should be passed. Although through my fishing technique I rarely snag a fish other than in the "mouth" I see a lot of non Alaskans who catch a fish and are then required to release it. I don't believe this is necessary, and for some visitors increase their experience here in Alaska. I believe about the same number of fish will be harvested. The bears in this same area where there before me and I respect them and try to stay out of their way, and I like seeing them, but for people unfamiliar with them, they could use a better understanding of how to deal with them. GOOD LUCK I believe you folks do a nice job with the fish runs. I turn most loose, keep some reds. Even the worst year for fish runs is better fishing than anywhere else. Keep pliers in pocket. Nice job! 1 couldn't find the area for this topic so I'll bring it up here. I have been fishing the upper Kenai since 1991 and live in Girdwood. I fish the area a lot during the Red runs. One thing I have noticed over the years is the increase In "European Groups" (specifically German Swiss). I have noticed over the years that it's changed from a fishing experience to a "harvest experience" for them. Specifically they tend to fish in a couple of areas on the way down to power lines. The groups get rather large and they have developed a manner of completely taking over the area to the point of pushing fishermen out of the "holes" when more of them arrive. They also process their fish in the same area (which I don't have a problem with) however they typically have a team going. One catches the fish, another cleans it and they rotate through the area. It makes it very difficult for Fish Game to monitor the activities. 1 personally know of two instances last year when the same "European group" fished in the morning and limited only to return that night (same day) to find them back fishing another limit. What typically happens is they fillet the fish and have one are two take them back to the campground while they continue to fish. Almost impossible to monitor their limits. They are very aggressive referencing these fishing spots. If they notice you fishing successfully they will crowd in next to you often on both sides even though they are plenty of "spots" available in the area. Fish Game (at least last year) did not do an adequate job monitoring their activities last year, It certainly has become an issue for some of the local fisherman t know. 1 did not get to spend as much time on the river the past few years, because of health problems. Hopefully next year will be better. I don't get to Alaska very often, so when I do I like to have the freedom to fish anywhere and anytime. I also like to have access to a good spot on the bank so 1 can catch my limit and then move on and give someone else a chance. Lots of fish and some good information available on the Internet so I can plan my trip are important. If you want to call me and have a conversation that would be fine. Thanks! 1 don't know why you survey. You will take from these surveys what you want and discard what you don't agree with and no one will be happy but you will get a pat on the back. Remember less is more except when it comes to access. I don't mind guides in limited numbers on the river. I don't like the idea of out of state guides making a living by hindering my activities. That can and have been a rude bunch. I enjoy the Kenai fishery (trout dollies) and believe that it is important to watch how the fishery is used and of course, attempt to address big problems if they develop. Guided use is now limited and I believe that the limit is 0,K. and should not be increased. If any, it may be slightly high at present. Please remain alert to how the fishery is being used. I feel that the main issue is the guide boats; I do understand that is their business and how they make their money. But in turn they are taking over the river and making it unbearable for unguided personal use fishing. I feel that you have done exceptionally well to have developed such a great rainbow trout fishery. It is still civilized fishing and has maintained its quality over the past 10 years. The king fishing is getting crazy and we are overfishing the entire lower and middle river. I do not have a solution to suggest but am willing to ac:u pt legulatlon to improve the quality of king fishing if all user groups are considered equally according to their amount of use. I do believe your rigid season dates and bag limits do not allow fishers to take advantage of late runs of both Sockeye and King Salmon that exceed the escapement you set as an annual goal. I feel the guides have used their money to take over the Kenai river. I fish with my family including my 2 year old daughter. A lot of days we are pushed out of the river. Over 40 of the guides are not Alaskan residents. They come to Alaska exploit our resources and take their money home. l have observed numerous occasions with my two daughters and wife where clients were urinating from guide boats. Only to have the Coastguard come and check my boat but not one other boat in the area (because they were guides). Limit the number of guides while you can and let the river become a resource where everyone can enjoy. I feel the guides should be regulated more- I don't think any out of state guides should be allowed. 1 chose to live here and 1 should not be limited on the time I can spend on the river -I say residents first and the left over can be used by out of state people. I fish your area every other year for about 2 months at a time. Compared to California your management systems is far superior already- it's hard to criticize a program that's superior to what your used to! thanks 1 grew up in Soldotna and moved outside to OR and TN for the last 12 years, recently moving back to Kenai. What I've come to understand is how special, unique and fragile the Kenai is. I'm thrilled at the dramatic improvement I see in bank restoration and attention to habitat, but am equally alarmed at the decline in quality of the king fishery we have seen and the depletion of large sized fish. The biggest user group on the lower river (guides) seem to care the least for this fishery one would assume they would want to protect it but they seem to be living in the past. The Kenai is special let's manage it so our children see the things we all remember about the river that made it such an incredible place! I guess I am a visitor but 1 live in Alaska... I had a blast fishing the Kenai and visiting Alaska in general. You guys are so lucky to live up there and I wish you the best in controlling the River. It is a little crowded at times. One thing that I would like to see done is a slot limit for all types of fish and lower the harvest numbers for out of state visitors. I saw people with 5 -6 coolers apiece at the airport...how much fish can one consume? I have been camping and bank fishing for kings in centennial park every summer for the past 11 years. Bank fishing areas have been regulated to the point where everyone is crowded into small areas. King Fisherman and red fisherman are like cattle and sheep. They don't mix. Red Fisherman take over and fish around the clock with NO respect to limit or any other rules. I simply quit king fishing when red fisherman mob the banks. Ban power boats on the Kenai. Open lots of bank fishing areas and ticket people for littering and bank destruction. Develop separate areas for bank king fishing only. Go to Catch and Release only for slot limit kings everywhere on the river the entire season. Stop commercial fishing anywhere near the Kenai River and strongly regulate and reduce commercial fishing all over Alaska waters. Your king numbers are going way down so if you want to continue your "Bread and Butter" sports fishing industry-you had better act now. I have been coming to the Kenai for 9 straight years. When you start to put further restrictions on, is the time I will find a different vacation spot. I have been fish the lower river for 27 yrs, have seen fishing decline without the fish there will be no guides no visitors, the fish must come 1st, I have been fishing the Kenai river all my life. 11 has improved over the years. Thanks to all the people that take care of it. They are doing a good job. Keep it up. 1 have come to the upper Kenai every year since 2041 in September. I can say with a certainty that over that time the number of boats fishing has gone up, especially on weekends. Generally I do not mind, except there are always a few inconsiderate boats that have to land on top of you and crowd you. Education might fix that. I have family in AK. 1 like to come once a year to fish and visit.1 salmon fish the Kenai; I think you should be able to keep the fish you snag by accident, up to your limit instead of wounding maybe a dozen fish to get three hooked in the mouth. Thank you I have fished the Kenai R for the past 34yr. Two areas which require action above all others are: over crowding of the guides on the lower river in July and access to the river for boat launching. 1 have stopped fishing reds because of the limited access and the reduced bank availability due to "posting" I have found that visitors want to see the river from picnic spots and camping area. Perhaps trees need to be trimmed or thinned to achieve this goal. It is difficult for handicapped men to climb up and down the Morgan Landing approach. How can this be improved? The locals are slow to change so your survey results need to be published state wide. Perhaps in nationwide media like Fish Alaska. More campgrounds need to offer electric, water and dump stations. The Sterling area is in dire need of a dump station and water supply. increase camping fees in those areas with services. I have lived in Alaska 33 years and have seen many changes to my "fishing holes ".1 do think Fish and Game is doing an excellent lob in trying to manage this mass flux of people to Ak. Yet I have lost my environment that I once had, my quiet little spots. Now I have to fish off season to enjoy I know that the money collected goes for a good cause, but it was very expensive for my family to make multiple trips to the Kenai Russian River, especially when having to take the ferry across. Maybe create a family price to make it affordable. Even when camping in the area where I might be able to wade across, I chose to drive to the ferry due to having a small child with me for safety reasons. I estimate that it cost me $90 $100 per fish this year. I live anchorage; we should make more camp spots at swift water camp and have a tent area. I have a RV and most of my people do but the big nice camp spots have tent in them I live in Alaska but 1 am a contract worker I lived in Alaska for 4 yrs from 1970 -1974. I consider it a great privilege to be able to fish in Alaska. We all need to do our part to protect our fishing resources. 1 lived in Alaska in 1985 -86 and enjoyed the fishing greatly- I visited Alaska since then about six times, all for summer fishing. Boat traffic on the Kenai has become too crowded. Alaska needs to protect the Kenai from overuse. This includes commercial fishing in particular set nets... Sport fishing brings lots of people to Alaska, and lots of income to the locals. I believe commercial fish benefits fewer people in the state when compared to sport fishing. Please keep this in mind. I don't think that feeding people all over the world, salmon is that important to most Alaskans and sport fisherman. 1 believe if you reduce commercial salmon fishing, many Alaskan sport fishing problems would go away. I love Alaska and 1 was a one time resident for five years. I hope to be a resident again soon. I wish to spend the rest of my life in the Soldotna area. I would hope that the Kenai river area will be there for generations to come. 1 love fishing the Kenai I love the Kenai River and am an avid fisher. Of course the preservation is important to me although there are many issues I am not qualified to comment on Regarding fees page 12 The facilities I use are very expensive. Residents should not be required to pay as much as tourists. I mainly fish the river from late August through April, so the only crowding issues I see are in September for a couple of weekends. I don't think limited access is the answer for a public resource. I only fish for rainbows and dollies on the upper so I can only speak for this but the guides seem to be the worst of the bunch. They pretty much whore the river out to paying clients when the residents of Alaska, the ones who have the most invested in the river, are crowded. It seems like almost 75% of the boats have the guide sticker on them. I would like to see more non guide days or even non guide weeks. Also cracking down on illegal guiding operations (which there are many) would be great too; they seem to be the biggest asses on the river. My family has been fishing the upper since you could take powerboats up the upper and camped out on the river every year. Closing it down to power boats was a great thing. Just 10 years ago we would see maybe 10 boats max where the Kenai dumps into the Skilak, now it gets packed down there every day during rainbow season. Some kind of limit on users would be terrible there in my mind, everyone should be able to go and fish it, but if it gets any worse it will be overcrowded. The area managers should let residents have a priority with use and/or voting and not let the bottom line control this river for more income to the state, Luckily there are a few places where the big fish hide out and there are too many bears for most people so they avoid it. When I start seeing people there I will probably cut back my uses. I oppose government intervention on number of guides as I feel that it will be self regulating as number of customers will dictate the number of guides. I spend my vacations at my Father in law Cooper Landing cabin on the Kenai River, It is where I take my two week vacation and I use a cataraft drift boat to take daily trips. On some days we just drift and enjoy the sights, other days we stop and fish. The river can get crowded during the red runs. It would be nice if there were some more maintained landing areas where there is not access to the walking public so that drift boats can pull off and find some fishing that is not very crowded. We also use the Ferry and enjoy walking down the shore and talking with anglers. It can get crowded, but there are ways to get out and find a spot and catch fish. We have to ensure that the fish populations are healthy and continue to spawn for my children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and generations beyond. It is our duty to protect the shoreline, the fish, the wildlife and the experience of fishing in Alaska. More patrols and enforcement to ensure that anglers are not abusing the fisheries should be supported and is a worthwhile endeavor. Requiring permits and limiting use is a possible way to accomplish this, but seems extreme if we provide good access that minimizes damage and have the right rules and enforce them. I strongly oppose any attempt to limit the amount of unguided anglers, tighten dipnetting regulations, or charge users additional fees. I am in favor of enforcing current rules, encouraging guides to behave responsibly when launching retrieving their boats (many times they take their time when there are a large number of anglers waiting to launch or dock), and am in favor of the number of guides (particularly out of state) being limited. The large numbers are creating a bad person for the upstanding guides that have fished this river and shared their knowledge and success with locals for years. I think education on the bearlhuman conflicts need to be addressed. Not just to remove the tables. Most real fishermen and women try to stick to the rags.; don't regulate them into doing something illegal, Thanks I think that red salmon fishing should be allowed snagging, considering that it already is snagging. I also have a hard time seeing some guides make a VERY comfortable living off of a public resources and only "working" a few weeks. I think the river use fee is a good idea but to save time and expenses make it a tag you have to get on your license for the year at a fiat rate from each user. The money should all go to Kenai river projects. This would be the easiest way to regulate it and just put a higher fine for people who fish without the tag. I think the Upper Kenai is a fantastic place and am amazed at the number of users /fishermen that are taking advantage of it, The number does not yet impact the experience too strongly but it is definitely a factor. I appreciate all the good will and effort that goes into keeping it a great experience. I truly enjoyed the Russian River. Caught a few fish but that was my fault learning. The people bank fishing were remarkably nice and 1 did not see a single issue. Everyone got along and all enjoyed this great experience. Thank you Alaska I used to work at the Russian River Ferry back in 2000. I moved back to AK 2 months ago and have fished the Russian /Kenai Rivers almost every weekend since returning. Overall, the area looks very much unchanged (a good thing in my mind) from when I was here last. I caught fish on every trip and the boaters (guided or unguided) posed no concern or agitation to me. I believe in the iaw and regulations, but I also believe government, especially in AK, should not take all the fun and joy out of exploring AK w/ tons of rules and regulations. Punish those individuals who have no regard for the rags established, but don't hurt the vast majority who follow those rules. I do not like the idea of these permits. AK is twice the size of Texas. if folks can't find a place to enjoy their favorite outdoor activity here, then that's their problem. Permits won't fix that. I was a visitor on the Kenai River, as a tourist the natural appearance of the river is what attracted me. Preserving the natural state of the river is important to me and is what will draw me to several return trips. I was on the Kenai for one day in a guided drift boat fishing trip. The river is beautiful, and as an outsider I'd support efforts to keep it that way. My answers to this survey are those of a one -time out -of -town visitor. I contribute economically to the Kenai but can't have strong opinions about most of your questions without more experience. I will never understand: 1. Why the fish counter is below most all fishing areas. Is this really an escapement 650- 850,000?? What about the sport fisherman's take 2. The commercial nets...that is insane...money wins again. Why cannot we learn from lessons taught in lower 48? At one time they thought the resource would never die off too. This resource MUST be protected at a much higher degree. Thanks I would like to see a stronger showing of fish and game officers on the river, especially in the Sanctuary and other high volume areas. Maybe then people would be less likely to do stupid stuff. I would like to see guides limited resident guides have first pick. Other permits to outer state guides be on a bid bases I would like to see the confluences at Skilak, funny, killey open to catch and release for fly fishing for kings. 1 would like to see the fish report updated more often, so we know when there is a big push. I would love to help enforce the morons on river banks at the ferry. I found that most of the people don't care about the hooks they use or size and they don't care about trout or dollies. I have watched some people keep up to ten dollie and yes I did turn them in. There needs to be a test before they cross the ferry. Thanks for asking. I would strongly support measures that reduce the number of fisherman days, even if this meant fewer fishing day for me. The overall quality of experience would improve. would think you would want to know of days fished by each person. Does a person, who only fishes a few days versus someone who fishes 60+ days, have the same impact on the study? Mandatory boater safety and etiquette. Educate not regulate I'm extremely happy I was asked to participate in these surveys; I was shocked at the number of anglers on the Kenai and Russian rivers and more disappointed with their attitudes, disrespect and lack of desire to pick up after themselves. 1 saw no game wardens and can only hope that this was because I followed the rules and walked away from confrontation with foreigners and other anglers lacking morals and respect for nature. I wish there was a way to share this environment with the bears and still allow this eco system to prosper. I would like very much to volunteer to help in any way I can. I especially would like to focus on river clean -up (fishing line, lead sinkers, hooks, trash etc.) I also would love work with or for law, rules, limits etc enforcement and feel the offenders need to be severely fined or required to go thru education and community clean -up. My family my father 70, my grandfather 95, two uncles and two cousins) enjoyed our visit but have noticed a big change over the years which made us sad to see what mankind has done to require more regulation, enforcement etc... Way too much trash and disrespect for the environment. I live in Kansas City, Missouri and I am an Eagle Scout in Boy Scouts. I love the outdoors and I'm serious about wanting to help clean up and restore Alaska especially the upper Kenai. I would like to let someone know that this particular area has a GREAT asset to the upper Kenai area and his name is (guide on drift tours) in Cooper Landing. Total respect for nature, fish, game, the rivers and stewardship of this land. Had we not taken his tour 1 doubt I would even come back to Alaska. I experienced too many people who don't care. Every time i fished, I spent more time picking up trash and avoiding disrespectful anglers, 1 also reported a man fishing in the handicapped area who was not handicapped at all or in any way except his respect, to the ferry operators at the Russian River and nothing was done. Having the chance to take a drift and fish trip with this particular guide changed my attitude as well as the others in my group.,,,it lead me to believe that with people like there might be a chance to save this area and I am willing to help. THANK YOU Please keep moving forward and working hard as you all have ....There are still some of us who care and want to help +III If I appear to be inconsistent in some of my replies...1 am sorry. As a Kenai Peninsula resident who is retired and fishes 4 -6 days a week (and I have a son who's guided the Kenai for 22 years) I am generally opposed to more restrictions. Yet, where have alt our fish gone too? DUH If something is not done about the guides we are all going to lose this river. Start by not allowing out of state guides to "cherry pick" the last 2 weeks in July, Then no more guide licenses issued until the total number is down to manageable levels. If stricter management is needed then it should favor the Alaskan resident and not the tourist. if a reservation system goes into effect for un- guided boats then it should be equal for guided boats and non residents couldn't apply. If you read my previous comments, you'll see 1 am strongly in favor of limiting the number of guides on the river. This issue has to be tackled head on, and it may require the legislature to get involved. A high density of guides on the Kenai River is not the only river where this problem exists. Deshka, Little Su, and Talkeetna Rivers all have similar problems, although not yet quite as bad as the Kenai River. Statewide we should have a limited entry for guides on every river system in the state. A team of state fish and game (and maybe DNR) should come up with a formula on the maximum number of guides (no more than one boat per guide) on ever river system, so that non guided anglers can complete at lower fishing densities. After each river (the Kenai in particular) has been evaluated, the number of guide "slots" per river should be put up for auction to the general public. Those people who have the highest bids (provided they have a history of guiding on that river) should be allotted those permits to be designated as "limited entry guiding permits Once purchased these permits could be sold /traded on the open market just like limited entry salmon permits. If this is not possible, another option to be considered on the Kenai is to eliminate guides to no more than 3 days per week. A third option is to eliminate guides all together on parts of the Kenai River. Since the upper river has the least number of guides this would be the place to start. Prohibit all guiding on the upper river for fishing, but guides could still operate for sight- seeing float trips. If these guides wanted to take fishing clients, let them operate on the lower or middle river, Many of them probably do this anyway...moving clients around depending on timing and density of targeted fish. Although float traffic on the upper river is relatively high, it has not yet reached the point where it's "unacceptable Eliminating fishing guides on the upper river, but still allowing sight seeing trips would provide a means for guides to still make a living and at the same time would provide more access by the general public. I'm concerned that this survey design is biased toward a conclusion that the river is excessively crowded and therefore additional regulatory limits are needed. The bias may well be inadvertent but the results must be qualified accordingly. A catalog of use related concerns like that provided by this survey does not automatically equate to a conclusion that use needs to be further regulated or restricted. The Kenai is a tremendous resource that attracts a high level of use by virtue of its inherent appeal and accessibility. We all agree that this precious resource warrants protection. However, it is erroneous to simply equate use with damage. While a part of each of us might wish the Kenai was closed to everybody but ourselves, we also realize that everyone deserves the opportunity to share this great resource. The Kenai is what it is. It is not an isolated wilderness river and we shouldn't try to make it into one. The people are not all going to go away and the Kenai will never be the undiscovered gem it once was. The river and watershed remains fundamentally healthy. We all agree that use and growth in use needs to be carefully managed but the design needs to recognize and support a wide diversity of needs and uses. The management system should not attempt to impose a narrow set of values that reflect the view of only a small segment of river users. In all considerations the resource, i.e. fish of all species has to, at all costs come first. HABITAT, wto that there no chance of the river surviving the extreme pressure it is experiencing. Popular vote will always result in the less than optimal management and probably eventually the loss of resource. Educate and be tough, the fish need all the help they can get, Do it before it is too late, don't allow over escapement ever again, It is KILLING the river! We pay you to manage, do You will get support if the policies are backed with biology. Our track record is very poor as history can attest. DO IT FOR OUR GRANDCHILDRENii'!UUU Thanks for all your work. In general am torn between improving and developing the river to help deal with the high use and leaving it as wild as possible. Tough to decide between these 2 issues. I resent the visual impact of ail the signs on the lower river I can say for sure I'd like to keep the Kenai wild, but understand that this may not be the best solution for this overused river. I can agree that number of boats should be limited, but hate the idea of a permit system. That is so "lower 48" to me! In general I think the Kenai Russian Rivers are well managed and maintained. I think some improvement in facilities and access would improve the experience for all users. In the area of Soldotna we encountered one group of fisherman that were very aggressive and seemed to cause problems. They were German and possibly did not know the rags. etc. feel a better education on etiquette and the rules would be appropriate. I imagine enforcement of rags are difficult with the limited wardens you have available but 1 fee! it definitely is an area that should be addressed. I saw many foul hooked fish that were kept. etc ps thank you for the wonderful job you are doing with your limited resources. All things taken into account we had a great time!! It ain't cheap getting from Boise to Soldotna; we keep coming back because I think it's the best fishing river in North America. The guides and people at the lodge have become our friends, but it's the river the whole package that makes it great. STOP THE PEBBLE MINE It appeared to me this past July there were not nearly the amount of fisherman on the banks by the Russian River Ferry. The impact of people trampling the shoreline seemed less than in years past which goes without saying, the less people the less impact. However, with a river such as the Kenai it seems difficult to reduce the amount of people who fish there because of the amount of fish that generally spawn. Everyone wants their fish. I have noticed the Russian River is being ruined by too many people. There are not as many fish as in the past. Not many trout at all. And the people who fish the Russian in particular don't seem to have any courteousness at all. Very rude, loud, pushy (push you out of your spot) I noticed this in September of 2009, It's like a different group fish on the Kenai from the Russian. Problem is I'm not sure how to single out the "bad guys" from the good guys, I almost want to say close the Russian River from all fishing for a few years to allow the fish to make a comeback but it is such a beautiful river and the campground is superb. If it is closed all would miss out. It is time for drift only, 2417 all year. The impact I have observed on Mondays is dramatic. It seems to me that the Kings and all the salmon are down in recent years due to commercial fishing outside the mouths of the major rivers upstream, This should be your FIRST interest. Stopping the commercials fishermen from catching all the future generations of salmon, Second, people need to be able to fish when they CAN. Not when they are told they can. No reservations should ever be required. There are too many rules already. Third, more restrooms are needed along the bank for drift boat users to use. We love to fish the Kenai. We always catch something and have a blast! Please keep the salmon alive for our kids to enjoy! It was a great experience and I plan to come back It would be good if there was more information on the internet, I stayed at the Russian River Campground once. The sign said the campground was full, but it was almost empty, I also had to make my reservations on line and pay an extra fee. It would be nice to have some more "remote" access where perhaps a trail of a couple hundred yards would lead you to an area that was not very crowded. This would discourage some folks from fishing that area, and yet, be wonderful for those of us who live in rural areas and are a little blown away by the amounts of fisherman "ripping reds" in the same water. Thanks for your consideration of my responses and I hope this is helpful in your future planning. You have a magnificent state up there, please don't screw it up. Thanks. It's stupid that you have to snag the fish in mouth. Just let the fisherman keep the first three fish he or she catches and then enforce the limit after stupid laws that Alaska has. I've lived on the Peninsula for 34 years. Again, i miss the old days when we had the rivers to ourselves but am trying to be reasonable to the reality of the economic tourism base, although I don't see that it improves our quality of life. Most of the tourism just goes outside leaving us to clean -up the mess and pay for the support services it requires. The lower river has become so ugly...the development so unsightly, lt's embarrassing to take out-of-state family and friends to the lower river. I stress that it's all about the fish and the beauty is in the upper and upper middle river. Outstanding job has been done with bank management and installation of fish boardwalks in recent years. Areas of the river, al! sections that used to be mud -holes are now flourishing. 1 have no problem anchoring our drift boat 10ft off the shoreline and red fishing in the river in waders. Works fine and I enjoy it so much. My entire family, now including the grandkids, look forward to this every summer. -I hugely support expanding fish boardwalks/platforms for access to red fishing. -I don't support developing too many more sites along the river, just expanding current sites. -I'll have to think about the "reservation" system, but it should impact the residents the least and the guides the most. We can only support so many tourists, no matter what we do. I truly believe we have a "Tourist Escapement" limit. Maximum limit met? Then "Terminal Escapement" implemented. Close the gates on the Sterling Hwy! Justjoking...sort of... -More "DRIFTBOAT ONLY" days would be great for the river (non guided). More enforcement needed to avoid anchoring in the slot! (note that I responded positively to perhaps paying a bit more in fees if it truly increased enforcement efforts. Kenai River crowding is a difficult problem to control but a few new "rules" would help the non guided angler in the short term. Construct a guide only boat launch and keep current public launches public. Don't let guides "stage" in a hole before 6 am. and limit the number of guide boats AND number of boats running off of one guide permit. Also one trip a day for guided angles would cut down on the number of boats the last two weeks in July. Larger parking lot at Bings. Day parking separate from vehicle trailer parking. wider launch at Bings. Less Government control of the citizens' resources The sport fishermen will control the resource. let the bears have time on the Russian without people during the peak times close the river at night. Let's go fishing! Limit the number of guides and guide trips to what is currently allowed or set a limit on what the current numbers re to prohibit increased guide use. Limit the number of guides on the Kenai and Kasilof rivers. (no power boats) on drift only days. Limit the number of guides on the lower river there are way too many love this river, best up here, even with all the guides and independents. If everyone respects everyone else it should be great for all. Camping along road system is a pain in the butt though. military and federal retired fished the Kenai from early June till freeze up in campgrounds and in sterling, had guest or friend since 10 June till now 26 Aug and plan on fishing through Oct mostly camping 3 to 5 days at a time. More attention to litter on the rivershed and boating manners, not limits. More law enforcement Rotary park to manage the people who drink too much! My belief is that the Kenai River (Russian River) should have more handicap facility for those people that can't fish like others. Should have more space so that everyone is not so crowded and fishing side by side, It became too close to throw your fishing pole. Please keep that in mind. I am one of them, I love to fish but I have broken bone and that make it hard to fish standing for long periods of time. I would love to fish like everyone but can't and some people don't understand that. So every year I look for my favorite spot the Russian River. My biggest complaint is about guide clients hogging the parking lots. I've had to show up at Pillars at 3 am to get a parking spot. Last summer at Bings I had to park in a camp site to get parking. All because guide clients were using the parking spots. And Bings was in August. I do believe guides should be Alaska residents and not allow the people from Wa. and Or. to show up in July and rape the resource. My concerns are centered around what all "improvements regulations, and requirements will cost and how much bang for our buck will be realized. I reiterate regarding rules and regulations, that if enforcement will be a problem, there is no point, My experiences on the river have been good, and as long as there are open places to fish and the fishing is good, then I am inclined to say that the Kenai, because of its high popularity and relatively easy access, will always be a high traffic area. If that changes any more than it currently is, then 1 believe that more restrictions may be needed. Maybe more roads to currently inaccessible areas that would provide the same experience are needed. Unfortunately the same problems are being played out in most outdoor recreation areas in the US My experience at the Kenai River was beautiful. I intend to go back in 2010 health permitting. My first trip to Alaska- it was wonderful -a real eye opener me fishing was fun- the sights were amazing as soon as I can afford to do it again, I will. My sons and I have floated the upper and middle Kenai River for several years now and have found the experience pleasurable for the most part. I feel two issues need to be addressed. 1, Fishermen on the upper and that portion of the middle river from Bing's Landing to the outlet of Skilak Lake should be restricted to barbless hooks. I am seeing a rising number of injured/disfigured fish. A barbless hook would cause far less injury/damage to hooked fish. 2. Boats on the upper and that portion of the middle Kenai River should be restricted to drift boats without kickers for at least 4 days per week. My wife and I both answered the questions. Regarding crowding: while sport fishing we ask the people to rotate a good spot. Then we restrict to five casts or "fish on" this worked wonders last year. Regarding use limits: the Germans will always find a way cheat. We have special permits (federal) but couldn't use the due to number of bears. No need you will never have the funds to manage this rule Regarding fees: the price goes up -the number of management expert increases -and the river remains the same. Don't block out the low income people -I've seen this happen to the lakes system near Dillingham. Need more questions "about you so you better know the people who are answering your questions. Big difference between weekender users, less than 10 days, and locals who are on the river every day, This questionnaire seems to be skewed against guides. Biased information is wrong information. If not for the guides and their economic contribution to the river we all would not have the opportunities that we all enjoy. No more motor boats no more guides drift boat only Notes on page 3: "Guided trip (mid august) so many boats running so fast past us as we fished I got knocked down by wake more than once (I will never be back to do that trip)" I am a fly- fishing guide in Louisiana, I can fish from Sept through march (our best fishing) and not see as many boats as I saw on the middle river in one day. I slow down to no wake to pass or encounter any other boat that is fishing. To get a good fishing trip (fly fishing) and a wilderness experience you must "fly out" and a long range fly out at that. Alaska is a great place; I call it "eye candy." I will be back for my third visit before I die, the only way I will fly fish will be on a long distance fly out to get away from the crowds. One member of our party received a $150 ticket for having his backpack on the bank while several dozen other fishermen were only warned. I know he is not pleased with the haphazard enforcement of certain regulations on the upper Kenai. The rest of our party also feel that the over regulation of the area is becoming cumbersome. We are all US citizens who spend thousands of dollars to utilize our own publicly owned resources. We also feel that we must be good stewards of our environment and should be allowed to enjoy The Last Frontier" without being treated like criminals. Open the closed areas and more board walks to these areas and restrooms, garbage containers. By adding permanent rough surfaces, pieces of some type of indoor /outdoor carpet to fish cleaning stations would make it quicker to clean fish and much safer. They are way too slippery. If you need more revenue to pay for these additions add a little too each license after projects are paid for reduce license back to what it was. Please feel free to call me anytime. Over this past decade the river has seen an increase of poaching, and snagging, This "Kenai jerk" is not fishing and it has been seen on other rivers, Salmon fishermen are not following the rules and you need more enforcement and public awareness. It's disgusting that fishing has come to this low level. DO SOMETING ABOUT IT SOON AS THIS PRCATICE IS NOW EVERYWARE ON OTHER RIVERS, i.e. ANCHOR, DEP CREEK, and ALL RIVERS. 2010 Overall I enjoy the river very much and have fished it for over 30 years. 1 do not expect things to be the way they were 30 years ago but I do believe something needs to be done in /on the lower river. The number of guides needs to be limited; they do a lousy job of policing themselves. Stop issuing any new guide licenses. Parking on /along sterling hwy must be addressed, Capacity is very limited and encourages unsafe behavior. Towing is not the answer!! A shuttle service from Russian River ferry area to 1st takeout would reduce car volume by 1121 Most users would gladly pay if concessionaire ran a shuttle. Take out area at 1st spot below ferry (Dims needs further development for parking. Total bottleneck here. Signage w/ "takeout" guidelines would be helpful. Notes on front page: this is ridiculous- I have two college degrees and I can barely figure this out. Poor planning leads to poor survey results. Who developed this? This very confusing. 1st in importance is the upper river. 2nd in importance is the middle river. Please consider more handicap areas and children areas..how can we let our grandchildren/children in this area and insure that it is a safe place to fish? I do not think that they should have to sit on the banks because they are forced out by other advanced anglers. There is a way to insure use for all we just all have to work together. Please consider ways to open more areas of the river to spread fisherman. Better maps to explain rules and access points. Please have a closer look at snagging and using big hooks to catch red salmon and doing so hurt lots of fish before one is legal Please put in the biological information for fish escapement into the Kenai River for all species of salmon. Are the biological escapements being met? If so, that point should be made clear up front. Also, tally up the amount of private and public monies that have gone into fish habitat protection and restoration efforts on the Kenai River. Tally up the amount of private and public monies that have gone into angler access for boat and bank fishing. Also, document the areas that have had a reduction in boat and bank access on the Kenai River over the past decade, and the areas that have had an increase in boat and bank access. Denote if that area is public or private access, and show the increase or decrease over the past decade. Also, document the numbers of river users over the past decades, in terms of boat counts for guided and unguided anglers and sightseeing, and document the number of angler days for guided and unguided anglers. I would hope at least this amount of verifiable use data will be included, so that actual numbers instead of people's reactions and feelings will frame the discussion of public use on the river. I would hope the river use study shows the actually historical trend data otherwise the usefulness of the survey itself comes into question. Please reconsider letting us get our 3 fish per day! They are all snagged even in the mouth! Just let us and the tourist go home with fish! I feel it is unfair because RIVER salmon don't bite! you know that and I know that! 3 fish -go home no problem. Thanks. Thanks, good luck with managing the challenges and protecting this unique resource. Reduce number of trips guides can make and reduce of boats guides can register. Permit system for middle river in July and august. Shut all fishing down in Oct 1. Let the poor fish have a break. Regarding parking at day use areas: depends on if state parks are still issuing tickets for "camping" in a day use only zone. 1 E: sleeping in your car after fishing but before hitting the road and being drowsy at the wheel. Regarding lower river boat capacity: I feel this question doesn't say what needs to be said. The problems occur when boats zoon up and down the river at day! Regarding tees from page 12: The funds would not be returned to help manage the river. The Kenai River is the most beautiful river in the world. (to me) I have fished it for some 25 years and will continue to fish it but it has changed a lot over the years. and with all the out of state visitors it is getting worse every year. AK residents should be considered first before others have the right to take our fishing and camping areas on the Kenai. Question: Why is the contractor at the Russian River Ferry not required to hire Alaskans? Regarding fees: "in-patrols/control are adequate and well run." Regarding Lower Specific Actions: "Repair Pillars boat launch in late to mid August -so it can still be usable into October. Need to extend concrete and possibly still dredge back in the motor caused gravel bar built up 2 -3 ft back from the concrete ramp pillars. No reason except neglect that pillars boat launch cannot be maintained and usable most if not all of October," 1. More boat launches needed in mid to lower section of river to reduce congestion and be able to get in and out for longer period in the fall, 2. Fix the pillars -that concrete pad had an 12 -15" drop right off the concrete pad. Then out about 2 -3 ft there was a boat prop wash gravel bar formed —6- 8' in diameter. more concrete pads would be best! or -get a backhoe and put the gravel back where it belongs =up to the concrete pads -fix the drop off." Restricting usage of the area I strongly oppose. Educating users about etiquette and regulations 1 strongly agree with. Fees to fish? We by licenses. Boaters pay registrations, and launch fees. I do oppose those who walk on the banks when the restoration signs are there. Russian River Campground attendant, rudest person I met in AK. Husband is AK resident, Husband and I are military combat veterans, were an family vacation. Really wanted to see the falls, no space for RV. Day use area should be close to river. If it was, it was not clearly marked, and I was required to talk to attendant, to determine where to go. We left. Cooper Creek camp ground was fabulous. Sites were large enough for RV. Rustic, quiet, pretty, and not too crowded. Wish the steam was stocked for kid fishing (small trout) and it had flushing toilets. Build more like this one. Internet Pictures of actual sites would be nice, Was disappointed a couple of times when RV sites were nothing but gravel parking lot. Have fabulous pictures of my kids panning for gold, "fishing" and playing in cooper creek. Loved it!! Will visit Kenai again and camp at cooper creek, Am looking for other similar experiences. Send the dipnetters back to Chitina. Shorten your survey -way too redundant. Some of the local people were unfriendly when we were red salmon fishing near Soldotna. I realize they must feel inundated with visitors, but it put a really negative feeling on an otherwise great day, Something must be done to manage the foreign visitors and their total disregard toward Alaskan fishing regulations. They avoid obeying limits on the amount of fish they're allowed, They are rude and belligerent when confronted and refuse to confirm to existing rags. Especially the Germans that fish the Kenai River middle and upper river. They travel in gangs and exhibit a bully mentality. Sorry for the late response, hope this input is still valuable. Thank you for your efforts to improve river sustainability! Sony 1 did not complete survey, i fished the Kenai 1 day and enjoyed the area. I do not feel that I have enough time on the Kenai to be helpful on this survey. You do have a wonderful river! Sorry I could not be any more helpful Spent 5 months on the Kenai Peninsula Thank you for addressing a very important issue for the Kenai Peninsula and the state of Alaska. We must address both fish population issues and the quality of the user experience. I am very concerned about the very ugly situation on the mouth of the Kasilof. There seems to be almost no enforcement, with lots of trespassing all around the beach /old cannery areas. People are camped everywhere! I also saw some boats on the lower river this summer that were overloaded and definitely not river worthy. Never once during our fishing this summer did we see a law enforcement officer for the Dept of Fish and Game ask an angler for a license or examine their catch. I found this surprising (we did see them on the river, perhaps doing counts of boats Couldn't more resources be placed on the Kenai Peninsula in July? The overall experience for those of living here is one of competition and intensity. We found ourselves electing not to fish because of the crowds. We hope upon retirement to have more time and the ability to work around the crowds a bit better. Thanks! Thank you for conducting this survey. The Kenai river is a State treasure and should be protected as such. I would recommend eliminating commercial fishing near the confluence of the Kenai and Cook Inlet to allow more fish to enter the river, increase sportsman catch and increase the visitors to the river over the summer. Alaska's increased financial impacts from more visitors will outweigh the negative impact to the commercial fishery, Thank you for doing this survey for all of us Alaskans. We do want to preserve the beautiful Kenai river for our future generations. Thank you for doing this survey. I have not fished much in the middle or lower river but may do so in year to come, so answered some of the questions. There are so many fish that I hate to see regulations preventing people access to try their luck. I have stopped fishing the Russian due to bears, so am adding to the crowding on the Kenai. Been fishing lakes and other creeks or rivers when I want a amore ristin €e environment. The Kenai has the big fish p h a fis�� an,. the big runs so will be an attraction even though it is crowded. Thanks again. Thank you for taking the time to do this. thank you for the opportunity to participate. Thank you for the survey. I hope more people /users of the river take the time to use it to help in its management. Thank you for the work that you do. Thank you for this initial study, it is long overdue. Thanks, I don't think that anyone in the Fish and game or managers care about what people think their opinions only bother them only if they make them look bad in their bosses eyes. The river needs many more open places try taking your family anywhere on the river in mid July if you get a spot your lucky if you are a senior or handicapped and can't stand in the water forget fishing. The greed of the state coffers has ruined fishing on the KENAI FOR ALL RESIDENTS UNLESS YOU ARE FORTUNITE ENOUGH TO OWN YOUR OWN 100 feet of the river, if anyone cares i think we should have one day a week to fish if we are residents with no nonres also how about a 5% tax on fishing gear going to open new areas on the river to bank fish. Thanks for all your efforts in trying to keep the river healthy and the experience a positive one. We always fish with the bears and have never had a bad encounter. However we have witnessed some stupid behavior by some others. I feel there should be some literature handed out about how to peacefully fish alongside bears and how to keep the impact on them positive. We so enjoy watching them fish, we hope that will continue. Thanks for asking Thanks for caring Thanks for checking with the frequent users! age 40 y Thanks for conducting this survey and using it for determining the best way to manage this magnificent fishery. Thanks for doing the survey. Please be careful about over regulating. It may seem like a lot of use, but it is spread out over miles of river and many hours of daylight. Money spent to improve fishing facilities, i.e. restrooms, parking, trails, boardwalks, signage, would be the best investment. If someone wants a true wilderness experience, it is clear the Kenai and Russian River is NOT the place to get it. So development in this area will help keep a majority of the crowd happily fishing, away from the remote areas. Thanks for doing this Thanks for soliciting my input, I hope these data will be put to good use. Thanks for the opportunity to complete this survey, i hope you are able to do something to save the river from the ridiculous bank erosion. One final note. The bank destruction is out of hand in many areas due to foot traffic as well as boat traffic. People tramp down the banks with little or no regard to the devastation they leave, If you were to place an officer at Moose Meadows and start writing tickets you could easily write 100 a day. This would not only provide an incentive to stop others from ignoring the signs to stay off the bank but could easily fund the officer's pay. Thanks again. I will see you next year! If you have any further questions don't hesitate to contact me again, Thanks for your work on this. Directing and managing use in sustainable ways that cater to the majority of the use groups rather than a minority is a huge task and hugely important as well. Good luck. The bank anglers at the confluence of the Kenai and Russian Rivers created a "combat fishing" situation. This detracted from our enjoyment of the fishing experience we had looked forward to. We suggest a minimum of 20 feet between anglers. The battle for fish will be over when the fish are gone. The economic impact of fishing is way overrated, What should take front seat is limiting all recreation on rivers oceans in general. The decline in kings returning not only on the Kenai but all rivers in Alaska is particularly alarming. I've lived here all my life and it hasn't hurt me one little bit to not fish the Kenai at all on some years. Limited access and more protection for the fish. Get rid of the commercial component AKA guides would significantly help. I don't buy the safety issue, If stupid humans die because they don't do their home work and then that is just eliminating stupid people. It helps protect the gene pool. The crowd problem at the Russian River have been caused by the state and federal boot's building the large parking area in the former wooded area at the R.R. and former sportsmans lodge property. At a minimum recommend that motors homes, trailers etc be prohibited at the RR parking area The existing laws on the Kenai River on harvest of salmon and trout seem reasonable. However, why even have such specific laws as hook gap restrictions, no pulling of trout up on the bank, and no snagging if there is virtually no enforcement, I have repeatedly watched people snag salmon by the belly, tail or some other illegal method with good success and on purpose. Many keep the fish and seem to just flaunt the law. I have never seen any enforcement and yet in the four years! have visited Alaska I have watched hundreds of actions in purposeful violation of the law. Near Cooper's Landing and the ferry crossing I have helped people by telling them if they accidentally break the law. For example, that the sockeye (lat. August) they have on the stringer is illegal o r in rainbow is illegal These tai Svcnc (late r",ugus�) t v n he F... I„ the 20 or Dolly I.. e_e accl en__. violations don't bother me nearly as much as those that break the law on purpose. Try telling someone that they are snagging and that it is illegal to keep that silver snagged in the gut, I tried this and 1 won't say anything again. People get violently angry if you try to say something. The fishing platforms installed at Morgan's Landing are useless...they are too high to enable netting your fish and the branches and bush under the platforms extent too far in front which causes snags and also makes it even more difficult netting, Due to the problems with theses NEW platforms, most anglers are fishing from the water's edge or in the water. Bank erosion is now more likely at Morgan's due to these ridiculous platforms. The Kenai River has been the same for many years and to me there are no problems right now. Increasing regulation, permitting, or increased enforcement is not what our Government should be focusing on. Instead, develop more boat launches and access points for user groups. July tends to contain the highest density of users on the river, but that is only for a Month, the existing system works, minus the minimal amount of Public Access Points, The majority of complaints regarding the Kenai River are most likely from people who do not frequent the river often. In my opinion do not try and fix what is not broken. The Kenai River is one of the most heavily regulated rivers in the country; please exercise caution in establishing new regulations. The Kenai river system is a state treasure and should be preserved as much as possible for use now and in the future. i hate to see restrictions, but we need to protect the environment, the fish and their habitat, and the other animals including the bears. I do worry about over- fishing and over -use. The Kenai river is the most pristine natural fishery I have ever been too. Great Job The month of July has gotten so commercialized that sport fishing -fun -has been lost! We just go early or late, to dodge the guides- the numbers during the day are just too large. Thank you The one statement that I would like to make is that the regulation brochures are written where as you need a lawyer to interpret as well as the hunting, The Pillars needs more parking for July. Also more patrols for dipnetters on boats. I always keep track and write down what we caught that day and before leaving the river. I never get stopped and there are people going over the limit or not recording their fish. Please remember tourists keep Soldotna and Kenai alive and make sure we always have fish for them. Thank you The prices for parking and the ferry have gone up significantly. This seems too high for me as know the Russian/confluence gets a serious amount of use. Also the last few years the bear situation has been bad. I believe management needs to keep looking at limiting the bear /human confrontations. On a very positive note I was only able to get three trips in this summer and each of the days were phenomenal... no problems with people and great fishing. The quality of life has suffered greatly over the last 30 yrs because of over use of the Kenai River. The regulations on the river are very complicated but do not see any enforcement of these regulations. I see a lot of people ignoring the regulations. If the regulations are necessary, they need to be enforced, The state of Alaska is a wealthy state. The availability of law enforcement officers (troopers and fish and game officers) is unreasonably low. I support spending some of our states wealth on increased enforcement presence on our roads, in our forests, and on our waterways. The survey was very good. it was hard to answer all questions. I tried the best I could. Thank you The two critical areas of management seem to be the lower river for late run kings and the Russian confluence for late reds (and this year early run as well). There were WAY too many people fishing on the 1st run. Please DO NOT let there be a 6 fish limit with 12 in possession ever again. it was the worst fishing in my life. The lower river has its max capacity of boats for the 1st run. The only way I see to limit the boats is to put a cap on the number of guides or increase the available good fishing by improving the 1st run of kings. Good survey. There are just too many guides! They own the river. I recommend mandatory catch and release education for anglers. Add Additional NO -GUIDE days on the river. Close the river to king and/or silver fishing during weak runs. There are not enough boat launches.,..the ones that are here charge too much. Most launches are free in the lower 48 There needs to be a limit (greatly reduced) on guided boats on Lower Kenai. Also lower slot limits (too many big kings get taken and less are seen every year. Reduce bag limit on kings to 1 per year. This survey is too long. This was my first trip to Alaska. The first day I ruptured a hernia just after catching a red. Spent two days in central peninsula hospital after operation. Then I watched my 3 buddy's fish for the 4 or 5 days. Observed quite a lot. Plan on coming back! Caught reds at Kenai and Russian rivers. Cleaner and more restrooms needed This was my first trip to the Kenai and we took a guided trip. We went mid -week in early August and I found there to be an adequate amount of privacy and respect amongst the anglers we encountered. I tend to prefer privacy over top -notch fishing conditions so tend to lean towards restricting use to promote privacy. That being said I had an excellent experience while on the river. This was my first visit to Alaska and the Kenai River area. Therefore, I am not familiar with the Kenai and any issues that may be of concern to other users of the river. I can only comment that during our visit, Sep 7 -12, we had a great experience fishing the middle and lower Kenai and also Lake Skilak where the upper Kenai flows into the lake. My concern would be that the natural beauty of the river and bank areas be retained for future users. Dwellings and docks along the river would definitely detract from the experience and cause environmental damage to the river and wildlife. Also, while we did not encounter a high volume of boats, constant interference with other fishermen would detract from the experience. If that were the case then maybe controls would need to be put in place for peak season. It appeared to me that the river area was being managed adequately and your survey demonstrates your commitment to protect the river and bank areas. We hope to return again next season. This was my second visit to Alaska and the first fishing. I do not favor regulations but see the necessity in order to provide the Alaska experience for the future, I loved the people and the state is beautiful. What comes to mind is an old bumper sticker from yrs ago. Don't califomicate Alaska. Your state has a lot of values that appear to be waning in the lower states. To not lose that is your task and it will be a hard one. Good luck and thanks for making my bucket list trip a success. This was our first trip /visit to the Kenai. We thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of our trip. The area Chamber of Commerce did a wonderful job in ensuring we had ideal weather. We hope to return sometime in the near future. This year was my group's 14th trip to the Kenai. It was my 19th trip to Alaska. The etiquette of the angling population, in general, has gone downhill for several years now. Overall, the professional guides in the Upper and Middle Kenai are the most polite and ethical I've known (and I've fished all over the world). Most of the problems I've seen in these stretches come from individual anglers in boats. Just a note: The trout fishing seems to get better every year. I think its obvious that strict regulations have helped make this improvement possible. I would like to suggest signs that instruct anglers in the neu proper way to catch and release. Many fish are being killed unintentionally by angler's poor handling of fish they are releasing. Some of the top guides would be great at writing instructions or teaching other guides how to release fish properly. Thanks for the follow up. Glad to answer questions. You have a great resource that I'd like to see remain that way for my grandchildren and their children. Upper Kenai needs more Campgrounds! Was disappointed in the few number of fish in Soldotna in July because the commercial fishermen were fishing extended days? How do we find out when the commercial fishermen are allowed to put drift nets out? This is important since I live in Indiana and can only fish AK a couple of times a year? Please respond. We are extremely disappointed in the July regulation of 4 stroke motor. We can't afford to buy another motor. (have a 15 horse 2 stroke now) which puts us out for our normal dipnetting anymore plus we one take 15 to 20 fish a year anymore. Fish counts are released too late to be able to hit a good day to catch reds by rod and reel. We bring our whole family, grandkids and all, every year. We love the wild and free feeling one gets only in Alaska. Don't screw it up with bureaucracy We enjoyed our stay in your beautiful state. We have a cabin on Dow Island and our quality of recreation has diminished over the last few years. With my work schedule I spend two weeks of every month of June, July and August on the river. I have a permit and park at Bings Landing. There are more guide boats plain and simple!!! Why don't you make them pick one section of river and stay in it As a means to limit guides and raise revenue jack up fees on out of state guides in a big way. As I have said parking at Bings Landing is my big concern. How many times have we seen the guide's clients park one deep in those big parking spaces that will hold 2 -3 cars? I have put two cars and a trailer in one space!! I don't think this is going to be a win -win situation. You folks have a hard job ahead of you, and all user groups are not going to be happy. Thank you We need more access to a campgrounds or parking areas, for Alaskans is hard to get any spot after a day of work, when the tourist have all day to take the perfect spot they want. This year I think it was so bad around the Russian river area, there was so many cars park on the side of the road, it was very dangerous just to drive by. (We didn't have anywhere else to park) With the bears, I think not been able to clean your fish in the river was not the best idea, I've seen people dragging the fish of the river leaving blood all over the place on the trail all the way to the campground and putting the carcasses on the dumpsters. Ideas 1) Maybe, if we had same kind of carcass grinder on the cleaning tables (only at the Russian due to not enough current) 2) To strongly enforce the rule to cut your carcasses in five pc and throw them to the current. 3) Not to leave any fish guts or any fish parts on the river banks. We need more river bank fishing on the rivers. It's hard sometimes to find a place to fish. We usually go gill net fishing on the mouth of Kasilof river for a week for our limit!! what I really want to see done is no driving from 12 am to 6 am. on four wheelers,,,so we could get some sleep during that time!! We visited the Kenai for the first time in 2009. We noticed extreme violation of fishing game laws when law enforcement was not present. Some fishermen were taking their limit several times a day. Many catches /keeps were illegal as well (fish not caught in the mouth). if more enforcement were present, this would not happen as much. Most locals were friendly and non violators. We noticed it was visitors from other areas /states /countries who were the worst offenders. Also, the amount of litter, broken tackle, and human waste was horrific. It really takes away from the beauty of a state that is reputed to be so pristine. Would like at least one more drift boat day during the week. Don't allow anymore new guide licenses on river, already too many. You already cap the number of people that can launch per day at each point of entry via limited parking and access. Cap the number of people that can camp on the Russian River during red salmon runs. Cap the number of people that can take the ferry to cross the river during red salmon runs. Most upper river guides are pros and avoid crowding by varying launch times and fishing patterns. Open a complaint line or web site for the public to note guide abuses and the outliers will be removed. Open a complaint line or web site for fishermen to note the litterers, crowding behavior, unsafe boating, rudeness at launch, drunks at the launch ramps, etc and you will find patterns of behavior associated with a few that can be addressed by license restrictions. We can self police outlier behavior of the rude and ignorant; we already do so. There are enough digital cameras on the river to capture most offenders in action and post the same on the web. However, you would have to act on the input, Unregistered campers on the upper Kenai river control sections of the river for days, litter the river banks, risk uncontrolled fires, etc. Prohibit them. Improve trails and knowledge of alternate fishing sites to disperse the fishermen to Crescent Lake, Ptarmigan, Carter Lake, etc. Remove non motorized bike prohibitions from trails to lakes and streams to enable people to travel away from crowds more efficiently. Stock and promote fishing on more Skilak Road lakes and streams to disperse the public via options. Improve Skilak Lake Road for better use and safety. Stock and promote a red salmon fishery in the Matsu Valley (Le. Little Susitna, Willow, or Montana Creek) to disperse the red salmon mania. You are doing a great job on a difficult matter. Thank you. Ps. Less guides please You are doing a great job on the River you can regulate the Tourist away make rules when they are necessary to much regulation will kit the experience. You have not said anything about the set netters that completely close the mouth of the river to any fish trying to go up. When we built our place on Cook Inlet the Kings were abundant. This year we only caught 1 king in about 8 days of fishing. Every year the fishing for kings is .poorer, WHY? s You're all a bunch of idiots!!! It's not about river its people control! Again, i took one ten day trip with my boyfriend. Understand the necessity of surveys like this, but I am just a girl in love with a man that fishes. You guys need to make this follow up shorter to have people answer all the questions a C Introduction Where boats are docked 7 x Private boat ramp 2 x Beaver creek 2xRW's 2 x Salmon Run Acres 2 x Kenai City Dock 2 x Riverbend Resort Izaak Walton Leave from mile 31 and power down Pillars Rental Boats launched from our locations RiverQuest Stewart's, Cho's, and Poachers Cove Tukak Harbor Other issues considered important... This section of the supplemental report provides verbatim comments made on the guide follow -up surveys, organized by question or topic. A "table of contents' by topic is provided below: Where boats are docked 1 Other issues considered important.. 1 Other reasons for reducing or stopped fishing on the Kenai? 5 Comments related to king fishery trend questions 6 Issues /Concerns regarding King Salmon fishery and Lower River 6 Other specific management actions for the entire river 10 Other comments about use limits or the mandatory registration system concept 12 Other comments about drift only issues 12 Other comments about guide /non -guide issues 17 Other comments about private development or visual impacts of development 20 Other comments about Lower River actions 21 Other recommended Lower River boat capacities 22 Other comments about Middle River actions 22 Other comments about Upper River actions 23 Additional general comments 24 Fishery condition, fishing regulations, and fishing regulation enforcement Above Bings I think King Fishing should be closed, fish allowed to escape. All boats on Middle River should be Flat bottom ONLY Backtroliing in drifting hole Anglers using anchors vs. not anchored for August silvers Excessive Regulations to Discourage River Usage Improper catch and release techniques of rainbow /dollies and salmon during spawning. Especially the molestation of by- catch sockeyes during the fall trout fishery. King run destroyed Negative impact of commercial fishing on Kenai salmon runs No wake zone needed at the Pillars, the only boat dock to access overcrowded restrooms on the lower river Not enough enforcement in total on river /too few rangers for length of river People not using proper catch and release techniques for rainbow trout fishing on Kenai (middle to lower especially) Guide /non -guide Size of king runs There are ZERO boating impacts /issues in the middle river!!! Academy training for all Kenai River /Cook Inlet users. Almost no effective law enforcement on the river Backtro!ling for silvers in august. Too many kings caught on purpose so guide can be a hero Cook Inlet Commercial by -catch of Chinook salmon Draggers Enforcement Enforcement of fishing zones by method. Enforcement should be concentrated on all users not just guided users Fishing ethics and handling of fish by unguided fishermen (anchorage area fishermen) Lack of law enforcement- Extremely important Law enforcement effort during non guide hours No enforcement late at night of the locals keeping to many kings and not tagging!! Enforcement of bank anglers in closed zones clearly marked with signs. Not Being Allowed to Leave Buoy in Water to Hold Fishing Spot during Trip to Restroom for Females for 20 Minutes. Priority given to commercial fishing due to historical power and political influence on the public resource. Red season...get 3 and leave.,.cut down on crowdedness Size of red runs The use of bait on middle river.,., impacts the trout population more than people think Total disregard by the public for snagging during the red season and NO park service enforcement. Use of Anchors in the river, the potential and probability of disturbing egg beds Using power boats to ferry anglers to and from drift boats anchored up at big eddy. Happens most Mondays in July. The group is from Oregon and staying in the condos up river. Very little State Parks enforcement 4 -6 am, Tukak harbor has lots of boat fishermen not tagging king salmon. They know there is very little chance State Parks will not come on to property. 1 st year guides running the refuge section under someone else's permit. Conflicts between guides lack of professionalism Discrimination against guides and clients such as hours and days Guide hours on the Kenai River. Guided and unguided silver fisherman not following laws by not stopping fishing after catching limit, I follow the rules and it makes me look bad when don't let my clients do it. Having basic ethic guidelines for unguided fishing anglers, i.e. Not crowding anglers in august and sept. How stupid an idea of a mandatory guide school, and the business burden that it causes Illegal guiding Illegal guiding activities- Extremely important No guide boats do not know all the rules of the road that the guides use Number of guided days available- -Too many now, need to cut back to max 4 per week The differentiation between guided /unguided anglers in the debate over use of the resource and regulatory process There is a growing conflict between guides /private boats that are drift fishing and backtrolling in the same areas on the river. Worrying about losing my license to guide because I have not been on the river for 15 years. All guides should have to take a drug test, there are way too many guides that can't pass a drug test guiding and leaving a bad taste in a clients mouth when the head off into the woods for a smoke break. Far too many guides are arrogant and possessive of the river and are constantly trying to intimidate private or rental boat anglers. Guides running two trips per day. LOWER RIVER GUIDES IN THE MIDDLE RIVER REFUGE Pirate guiding on Upper River. Refuge permit holders should be the ones running those trips. The social conflict of the guides and the public Time of guided trips -In view of above mentioned issue, earlier and later fishing possibilities for guides How stupid an idea of a mandatory guide school, and the business burden that it causes Facility needs/ evaluations Docks and boats extending into the river reducing fishing areas Maintenance and cleaning of R/R fac. River Quest was allowed to develop build too close to the river. Highway adjacent to river Need more public launches The mis -use of Jims landing by private users and some guides. Not enough Drift Boat launching facility's in Lower River, especially below Eagle Rock. Not enough drift boat accessible facilities. Every facility is set up for power boat use only. Drift boats cannot land safely at most facilities provided. Very frustrating for lady fishermen in Drift boats. The lack of courteous behavior by private boaters at Jims landing Boating regulations and safety Education of handling trophy rainbows on the river Education of private boater safety Being a property owner there are issues with regards to boat handling especially where we live. Coming out of Poachers Cove on half step has to be the most frustrating of all. Our boats just get pounded on the bank. It starts right at Poachers Cove entrance to their boat harbor and they wit continue to drive that way until they get to Krogs place. Boat Handling and courtesy on the river. NO LOW HOLING. Should be a training course for ALL boaters on the Kenai. Boat handling skills of unguided boaters Lack of any enforcement for unsafe boat operation in congested areas. Rules of the road and unsafe operation mainly by the general public. Lack of skilled boat operation, boating safety and courtesy by private users (non guides) Motor boat users not using rules of the road, such as when a power boat comes near a canoe or kayak Need for a MANDATORY boater safety requirement to run a power boat on the Kenai River in July -ALL boaters! Safety education of all boaters/boat operators Safety of guides, clients and other passengers in the presence of unlicensed boat operators (private boats) Safety of take out at Jim's Landing at times of high use it can be dangerous Private boaters need to complete a boater's safety course. Lower 48 made it law. There is going to be some major accidents soon due to this. Wakes of boats running too close to private property with boat tie ups and shore anglers. Need to educate boaters on running in the middle of the river at all times unless a gravel bar or other obstruction is present. Many uneducated guides and private boaters run up or down the left side of the river regardless and don't understand safe boating or the impact of running their boat so close to the shore. Reckless boat operation by private boaters There needs to be some sort of boating safety course for the unguided. That just might curtail some of these issues!! Lack of education and training for public users Coast Guard licenses for all power boaters on the Kenai River /Cook Inlet. General crowding competition or concerns about development of power boats between Skilak Lake and the upper Killey after mid august. Number of anglers in non -peak (guide) hours days Number of boats on all rivers...Kenai and Kasilof Camping on River too intensive use. Number of King Salmon Bank Fishermen Fishing in Areas Closed to Boat Fishing for King Salmon, i.e. Centennial Park Number of power boats that access the Upper Kenai near Skilak Lake below the Canyon? Upper river usage after mid august and crowding at Jims Landing Rmearch of power boats between Skilak Lake and the upper Killey before July Number of Anglers on the Upper Kenai near Skilak Lake (below the Canyon)? Lack of enforcement of regulations on river bank development Make river property owners show permit on bank if doing any development and enforce rules... More access There needs to be MORE "improved" access for bank anglers during the 2nd Sockeye run!! Provide more quality fishing areas in Alaska besides the Kenai River Drift only How can you allow the middle river Refuge area be torn apart by power boats. This is unconscionable. Maintaining zones specific for drift fishing versus backtrolling during king season Take motors away, Drift Boat Only o Flat Bottom in Middle from Skilak to Super Hole Discourteous behavior Drunken boat operators on the upper river. I'm most concerned with the person rowing the boat and drinking. People need to learn river etiquette Long responses...many issues u:i ff ilk ro n The intrusion of the private land owner into the everyday experience for river users cannot be denied. The negative impact of jumbo boat docks with walkways that lead to them should seriously be re- considered. The need for a private boat dock in the main river which exists in a travel channel must be questioned, but the conflict and ill -wil( that occurs as a result of boats waking these private boats is unavoidable. Presently, I can show you several docks in the River Quest subdivision below the old boat launch that stick out into the river about 15'. I would say a 7 -8' walkway to a 6` wide dock and another 1' for fenders to which we tie an 8' wide Willy boat and a private land owner has now claimed 20 -25' of the Kenai River. Of course they will be fishing from these docks 24 -7 so now a traditional hole that we used to fish close to the bank is basically taken from us by one user group. If you think this is inaccurate, I know they catch kings while fishing from their dock. On the other side of the river below Tukak Harbor, there was actually a proposal made by one of the homeowners to institute a 5mph "no wake zone." These docks and their boats also claim about 20 -25' of the travel channel. By proximity to their homes, I believe that there is a wrongful assumption that the dock, which sticks out well into the Kenai River into the navigable channel, is thus, their own. Yes, these docks are subject to boat wake and I wonder where the liability will fall when the inevitable happens? I refer to the fisher who will fall from these docks (just about none of them wear life jackets) and will claim that boat wake was the cause. Or what will happen when a boat strikes a dock on a dark silver salmon morning? I would like you to re -visit the issuance of these permits as totally unnecessary for the greater river experience, Speaking of the River Quest Subdivision: this is absolutely the biggest eyesore, mistake on the river. Just how they were able to violate the 50' setback with those monstrous buildings is a mystery to all users. We now have a high density "professional tourist" group inundating the Kenai on a 24 -7 basis, and make no mistake; these are guide -like "privateers" who are having their greedy little way with the Kenai River. These people who stay all summer are efficient killers who need to be considered a third user group. I would like to ask my State Parks to work with whatever agencies necessary to totally reconsider the issuance of boat docks that are unnecessary that also guarantee greater impact and greater conflict. Reconsider and revoke, or issue on a yearly basis after you have observed it in action. Stop giving the Kenai River away to rich private land owners. The fishing shacks below the River Quest subdivision that hang over the river should have never been allowed to exist. They trample bank at will during red season and once again, the river user must gaze at that ghetto. Please feel free to call me if you would like clarification on my statements. This typing format makes it difficult to re -read and edit my comments. We could also have a discussion about the very confusing red and white "Waters Closed to Fishing" signs that are making a lot of in the form of fines for the state parks. Inadequate number of state parks and boat launches. This problem has allowed private boat launches to gouge prices for their service. When we think about any private entity today getting a permit to bulldoze a new boat launch today it is laughable. Yet those who own boat launches today that were built without much biological concern many years ago now have the upper hand when it comes to pricing. I would like to establish a Boat Launch Review Committee with me as the Other comments Other reasons for reducing or stopped fishing on the Kenai? arch ano chairman. If it is determined that you are unfair in your fees, I have the power to not grant your next dredging permit. The State Parks missed a great opportunity to purchase the River Quest Subdivision, Stewarts Landing and others when they have come up for sale. I hope you realize that any hope for more drift boat days is virtually impossible without it. As it stands right now, most of the drift boats fish the incoming tide and get out at Eagle Rock where they pay $25 to get their money worth and because some of them are older and just can row the whole time, anchors are dropped. This is becoming the "accepted" practice and to my knowledge, something that the regulations say we were not supposed to do? Anyone that ventures below Eagle Rock must get out at a private dock at Beaver Creek or go all the way to the Kenai City Dock. This can be treacherous work with an incoming tide or just a little breeze, In addition, if the commercial boat traffic is high, the danger increases. My suggestion to the Park Ranger was to consider a drag out on both sides of the Kenai Bridge. I believe this is achievable if parking can be worked out. We used to drag out at Cunningham Park before they made it a bank fishing only facility, a mistake in my opinion. When you think about where most people fish (Lower River below the Pillars) and then look at the access points they use, you can see that most have quite a boat ride to get to their fishing hole. More access points can mean shorter rides and less traffic. In conclusion, the state needs more access points to disperse the fishers, to keep private boat launch fees in check and to give the drift boat idea more feasibility and better quality. The fact that the state did not have the idea" of obtaining the River Quest" property has created a monstrosity that absolutely ruins the river experience in that area. I have actually had customers ask to fish somewhere else and I agreed. Yet, what a boat launch that would have made, a campground and an educational facility. Growing number of oil trucking company's buying boats and having employee's fish friends good clients before 6 am Forestry management adjacent to river edge Rental boats Unlawful cutting and clearing of vegetation -no enforcement of the current 50' rule Better screening of non guides when involved in a boating incident. Ex. breathalyzer, urinalysis Lack coast guard or state approved licensing for private boat operators Rules of the road Back trolling has limited the drift fishing substantially on the lower river. Back bouncers at Beaver Creak can be very rude. There may be one back troller on the upper bluff and will refuse to move for several drifters. Only time 1 have had a verbal confrontation in several years, and it was very uncomfortable for my clients and his. He was belligerent. WE HAVE TO HAVE MORE BANK FISHING ACCESS. Didn't stop guiding but there's getting to be to many people in the fall trout fishing time, and it's mostly unguided folks, most people are good at taking care of the fish and backs but there is a lot of folk that just don't care... Ending catch and release restrictions in the mid river section at the same time in July as the lower river would reduce crowding on the lower river Guiding swiftwater Have never guided Lower River. Middle and upper are great especially when not crowded I have reduced guiding in May, what used to be a viable season. Our season has gone from about 6 months to four now, and I believe it is well on its way to being less, as June slips away! I started guiding in a powerboat and now fish the lower section of the Kenai more than the middle section. I used to fish the middle section more in a drift boat. Not enough facilities and maintenance of the existing ones for users on the river. The general public and the newer generation of guides have become ridiculous in the unsafe acts as well as the unscrupulous manners. The middle river above Bings is turning into a big deal now and because it is such a much narrower river area, it is not a good place to be during peak use Toilet paper on the upper Kenai. Use to fish the upper Killey River month of May and early June now it is closed. No crowds Per; Comments related to king fishery trend questions ADF &G DATA is unreliable, managed for commercial fishermen!! Other wise there would be NO netting!! And a minimal sport harvest of Kings!! Aesthetics, Agency Management Practices, Enforcement Don't trust the sonar counts Sonar counts are a joke, right? i The sonar counts are not worth our time or our money!! It is a lame tool to regulate the fishery on Time of year as to location of fishing Weather extremely important Weather, Water Level, Client Ability, Client Expectations, My Expectations, Number of inexperienced boat operators in area (I prefer to fish among others who are safe and competent) Issues /Concerns regarding King Salmon Fishery and Lower River 1) Offer guided drift boat fishing on Sunday and Monday 2) Somehow offer more drift boat fishing... it would enhance the fisherman's experience, what we do with the powerboats is not sustainable!! Doing drift boats for all would be. It levels the playing field for the fish and the fisherman, reduces use, less erosion, non polluting and the perfect model of a green and sustainable move. It is bold and the entire nation maybe watching. It is an opportunity to do the right thing in time! 3) Good luck with the logistics 2009 is a difficult year for comparison of trends within the past 10 years due to water conditions and flow. While we may have seen a pattern of use developing, 2009 was an exception to this pattern. Of great concern is also the lack of enforcement in the lower middle river, i.e., just above the Soldotna Bridge to Moose River. 2009 season was a disaster due to the mismanagement of the resource over the years, and is getting worse. Between commercial and sport fishing interests the resource doesn't stand a chance. Other management techniques and regulations across the board need to be implemented if we want future generations to enjoy this resource. A growing number of seasonal residents fishing 3 -5 days a week in July fishing 4am -7am A lot of back trailers below sonar have river blocked for drift fishing. River should be drift only from corner above sonar to corner below, in the port it wasn't blocked off. This is worst situation on the lower river, 2nd boat traveling at eagle rock. All we ask for is a couple miles of free water, Back trolling has become increasingly slower (i.e. "power anchoring" in the better part of the hole) resulting in less efficient passes and fewer passes per day as one attempts to avoid stationary vessels. Fish sizes seem smaller on average. Catching was down for me in 2009. This is due t0 the high series of tides and rising /flooding water in the last 2 weeks of the season. These conditions created great congestion into the few remaining fishable areas, most tips of islands and very near shore. The area below Eagle Rock was generally considered to be un- fishable. The Eagle Rock drift was "taken over" by back trailers during this time. I believe this is a selfish "must catch fish for clients" trend that will continue next year if something isn't done. I suggest taking boat numbers and making calls, perhaps issuing warnings, after which a one day penalty off the river during guide days is assessed. That was disgusting. 1 find it ironic how rude guides are to each other, We have considered what the river would be like with fewer guides and yet, many of the young guides do not have their true Coast Guard 6 passenger license required when most of the old guard began guiding. Instead, they are allowed a "Western Rivers" permit. It makes me wonder if the Parks really want a better river experience or do they just need the money that these license fees bring? Cutting people off/corking seems to be the new norm and I believe a paragraph on ethics which clearly states that boats entering a fishing area, go to the "top" of the hole to begin fishing should be included in the reps. Once again, the professional tourist, especially those in River Quest Subdivision, need scrutiny, It would be interesting to see how many of these people are claiming false residency. I never see fishing licenses being checked. Many of these people fish in the morning, take a siesta, then fish again later in the day and this is hard to monitor. Clear trends in the lower river during king fishing: a substantial increase in non -guide boats. Much more unsafe boating occurring, as the general public doesn't know right -a -ways, travel lanes, etc. It's like the wildwest, but in honesty its not just private boaters,.. even younger guides often ignore rules of the road. There is a big need for a mandatory boater safety course and certification as serious accidents occur each year, and for every serious accident there are HUNDREDS of close calls only avoiding collision by very alert, defensive boaters! Also, other trends include: obvious targeting of kings during closed season, i.e. "catch and Release" king fishing with big gear and in big water (main column) during the first two weeks of August while supposedly silver fishing. THIS IS A GROWING PROBLEM, AND NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED WITH AGGRESSIVE ENFORCEMENT. Finally, we need more access and we need more restroom facilities. At the very least, the porta- potties that we DO have, should be cleaned /pumped more frequently during peak seasons. People from all over the world visit this world class river, and frankly the restrooms are nearly always disgusting, which I think is a real embarrassment for our special area and our great state? Fishing for Kings on Anchor out of a powerboat is non existent. i For some reason there was very little effort below the counter in 2009. It was tough to get a fish there this year. Up until then the effort had increased each year, Most back trolling areas where less crowded this year but it seemed like there was a lot more drifters at eagle rock. Guides and public need a BLOG and a web site to get ALL involved 8 High water and dirty water kept more boats fishing farther up river then usual. Very few boats fished the tides in late July which goes against the trend. High water changed locations on where the kings hold. Some picked up on it and had great success. Others were unable to change and had a bad year. Over 17 years of fishing the Kenai I have noticed less user conflicts during guide hours the last several years than the first 8 -1- yrs. Private boat usage is up and user conflicts outside the guide hours are up. I believe the guide academy has been a major help, High water makes comparing this year rather difficult compared to other years especially during July. There are less people fishing now than there were in the late 80's and a lot of that has to do with the increase in regulations during the early king salmon run. Also, more places for the average angler to go fish with the tractor launches at Deep Creek, Homer Lagoon, hatchery kings in the Kasiiof, hatchery kings in the Ninilchik River, and with the development of both Burna Road and Deshka landing in the Valley. I am very disappointed that fish and game does not manage this fishery as a trophy king fishery. We have the biggest kings in the world. This is evident by the way fish and game watches over the set net fishery and does not think that they intercept kings bound for this river. Most of the people know people who have set net sites and they know what is going on. We also need to protect our fish once they enter this river with stricter regulations, no matter whose feelings we hurt. 1 was raised on this river and I know what this river used to be like and I do know how to fix it. The problem is fish and game does not care about this fishery and only have commercial interest in mind. You ask how we can help the Kenai river king fishery, the reality is we will never be able to fix it because fish and game does not care. They show this every year. The king fishing on the Kenai River is the economic drive of Soldotna a long with the red fishery and it is going away as evident by the lack of people coming here now. TOO BAD HUH. I don't guide king salmon on the Kenai 1 feel there is more and more illegal guiding activity before and after hours by registered guides from non registered boats, 1 also witness guided fishing by registered guides from non registered drift boats on Mondays in July. I believe there should be another day of drift boat only fishing including guided drift boat fishing. (Tuesday, most powerboat guides now have drift boats for Mondays anyway so they will not be loosing revenue) I also believe that there is not enough enforcement on the river, especially before and after hours to curtail illegal fishing and guided fishing. I believe that F &G and Parks should spend more time checking individual boats, than flying up and down the river and only observing rods down. If boats and licenses were checked more often there would be less temptation to bend the rules. I have been abhorred this season 2009 by the backtrollers moving into the Eagle Rock drift area, this causes many conflicts I have been very busy, I have a real job, and I cannot make a living on the river anymore since F &G keeps giving all the salmon to the commercial netsrrm!E I know that is why you want me to fill out the survey, more information to combat the commercial guys but after filling out forms and participating in the fishery for 15 plus years nothing has happen yet. We are still losing fish in the river. I getting to old to play your game and do your work. I have been fishing the river from the early 80's fish stocks have been going downhill every year, If I did my job as bad as you do your job I would be fired. You need to look at the number of PRIVATE boats poaching more that 2 kings a year. Is it mandatory to fill out the survey, if it is I will force myself to do it, Looking to retiring on the river with the 2 fish that swim by my fish camp. I moving to Panama someday where there is no Park Ranger and F &G and the commercial fisherman fish for food not some lobby group. Like Alaska was 30 years ago. Sorry you asked? I have fished and run the river by myself since I was 13. Creating HP and length limits for the boats has kept the Kenai a lot more pleasant and safer than in the past. Back in the 80s it was a free for all where you had a lot more erratic behavior by inexperienced boaters. I would say that most (90 boaters that run the river now are experienced on the Kenai itself, and fish it regularly. Now we have a very predictable traffic pattern with everyone moving at a moderate speed. The biggest difference I see now is that the red salmon fishery is overrunning the river. I do think it is regulated well with bank closures, but the enforcement of bank trampling is not well enforced. Snagging and retaining fish, and over limits of red salmon is blatant and not enforced well at all, I observed a conflict between a guide boat and a private boat about the guide backtrolling in the drift at Eagle Rock. The cause of the problem was not the guide boat. The cause was the 20 boats (guides and private) above the guide boat that COMMAdng OCtObei made it difficult for the private boat to drift. As a guide who predominately drift fishes, I understand the conflict of keeping a whole section (eagle rock, the counters, or the upper bluffs across from RW's fish camp) of a river open for a few number of drift boats, However, without some sort of ethical fishing publication stating the appropriate areas and fishing methods in specific areas these conflicts will continue to grow, I fear the people in my boat and others in boats around the area left the river with distaste for fishing because of the conflicts they observe. 1 believe that the guide academy greatly improved the river, but updated information about guiding ethic would also be very helpful, I only fish the lower for trout in July and august.... from Moose River to Soldotna Bridge. t usually fish the Kasilof for the King salmon. So many of these questions don't apply to me. From what I have seen from just "fun' fishing with friends on the lower river it sucks. I dislike it. Way to crowded, But it is nice to smack a king when you drifting through 30 powerboats in a hole. I was one of the first people to start back bouncing the Kenai and have been doing it for about 1 fiyrs now. It is a very effective way to fish and have noticed a large increase in the number of guides and local people doing it. There are only a couple areas to do it and it has gotten to be congested there and with this there are a lot of conflicts with unsafe boat handling from people trying to go through the areas and not paying attention to what is going on. People just need to use common sense. The same goes for backtrolling, a lot of cutting off where others are fishing and unsafe boat handling. I'm an Upper Guide who does not fish for King's at all; the above questions do not apply. In 2009, because of high water the tidal zone was not good and most boats fished farther upstream. Because of economy less guide boats were on river, and the ratio of unguided boats to guide boats was higher. The fish are getting smaller to many Jacks, we need to kill more jacks, super Tuesday used to be better but now is just another day or worse fishing than other days, but anglers still think it is going to be better and Tuesday is really the only over crowded day, need to educate people that now compared to the past that other days are better than Tuesday and to avoid Tuesday morning, if I was an unguided boater I would never go on Tuesday. In general I think people are fishing lower and lower into the tidal zone, especially mud island to Warren Ames bridge, except 2009, with the flooding /debris /turbidity down low very few were down there the last 2 weeks of July, but that was only due to the flooding in my opinion. In General, the Guides in the Kenai are better fishermen than they were 10 years ago. That is why you see more boats in the Lower River, below the Sonar. That has always been a more productive area than most of the upper river during average water conditions. In 2009 there were a higher percentage of Guides Drifting /Dragging during the "right" times than in the past few years. The truly good fishermen use the technique that is best when it's best, water and tide dependant, Increase in all user groups, extreme crowding, many near accidents due to negligence/boating safety issues Its getting not fun anymore, too many people. Just go to eagle rock and look how bad the river is affected by draggers constantly going up and down total mayhem should not be legal in July also if we want to bring this thing back with any quality of experience we must go drift only during guide hours hate it but its the only thing that makes sense. Kenai is the most overused and overrated sport fishing river in the world, for the last 25 years. But, good money and fair at best fishing, Less pressure Tess people fishing Lots more unregistered, illegal guiding activities. increased danger from private boaters. The level of un- courteous increased among all river fishermen, (guides and public), with the level of fish caught decreasing. Was particularly concerned with the number of guides and public fishermen that targeted spawning king salmon below skilak from boats because of the low numbers of king salmon in traditional areas. And the amount of public fishermen that targeted spawning king salmon from the bank at Centennial Park where it is closed to boat fishing. With the new braid fishing line, bank fishermen can now easily fish for and catch king salmon consistently where they never could with mono before. And these kings are 80% of the time red spawning fish. Lower returns, too much ocean harvest. More clients are coming up once and then find out about renting boats and the following year rent the boats and try and do one day of guided trip. New boats owners with no skill on the water and with that many boats bad news. More inexperienced boaters that do not know the rules of the road or common courtesy on the river and do not know the river More users, less fish, more general public users at all times, river crowding not all caused by guided anglers, fish allocation more tilted to commercial fishers in inlet, overcrowding caused by poor returns to other rivers and streams, use of antiquated sonar equip to estimate in river counts, resource managers more worried about income to corn fishers than resource in river renewed Non guided use has increased in July non guided boaters becoming more aggressive Poor economy bad water conditions last 2 weeks of July need to limit the set nets in Cook Inlet way to many emergence openings they are killing the king run in the river! River was in flood stage during last week of July Seemed to be less traffic probably due to economic considerations. Also, seemed to be less success rates, Since we don't fish the lower, I have only second hand info Take powerboats away, give more drift boat days only. Give drift boat guides a day or 2 without powerboats. The drift boats are catching too many fish. I know because I've fished on Monday and it's too good fishing. If we make this a drift fish only I think we will kill them all in 5 to 10 years. AR the boat traffic in Juiy is helping the fish, we cannot catch them, their so spread out and flying up the river, according to your counter there in the river. So where were the kings this summer? Guide pressure might not be as bad if there was NO time limit? I know there will be drift boats on Monday but I don't think drift only is the answer. The flood water of 2009 due to ice damn breakage seemed to have a negative effect on fishing for king. The season was typical of a decline in harvest opportunities which seems to decline year on year sine the past 10 years. I also think the commercial is have a negative effect on sport fishing and I am concerned that we will not have a sport fishery on the Kenai River if we continue to allow the nets to commercially rape the harvest. The last three Super Tuesdays in July are the most over crowded. Because of the net openings on Mondays there are not more Kings, making it even more difficult. I even had a stranger in New Zealand tell me he had been to the Kenai for Super Tuesday. On top of the river traffic those days result in the boat launches being over crowded, as both guides and sport fishermen vie for the few open places to park. The lack of parking spaces at the Pillars is also the result of guides (who launch elsewhere) having clients park their rental cars in the few trailer spaces. We could use another public boat launch, as well as a separate lot just for cars. The most experienced/knowledgeable operators ARE the guides...if all boaters /operators were treated EQUAL and had to quality for a license /permit to operate on the Kenai River it would go a long way towards eradicating many of the conflicts during times of congestion...what we have now is a kin to licensing motor vehicle drivers from Soidotna and other operators being unschooled/licensed and deciding the rules of the road for themselves..,the last question should be "there are more inexperienced boaters on weekends' The number of people on the lower Kenai has seemed to decline in 2009 maybe because of the economy or maybe because the fishing has been more hit or miss on the Kenai so people are fishing other locations. I have been seeing the river crowded 6 to noon and then empty the rest of the day a lot in July the last two years. Only the last week of July has been crowded beyond belief and I have been fishing the Kasilof in the evenings most of July and having better success than I can explain. Keep the Kasilof the way it is and don't put in a state launch below the bridge it will cause over crowding and ruin the river. Also on the Kenai if the state would allow around the clock guiding it would cut down the crowd issues. I fished on the Kasilof 3/4 of July never got on the river before noon and seen no more than 12 boats all night long and I think that is how the Kenai would be. Most of all the Kenai needs at feast 3 days a week where it is drift boat only and this would help everything as well. I am a power boater on the Kenai only because it is unsafe to take four clients on the lower Kenai in a drift boat in July. The regulations (slot limit, bait, dip netting) are forcing many angler to come in July for their kings. Remove the slot limit and remove the use of bait and I predict that the number of anglers would even out. The number of non guided boats has really increased. Many of the rental boats are being rented by the same person season after season and you see one guy driving the boat over a week or two period, but he has many different people in the boat. I am suggesting that some of these folks are guiding. I could suggest how to figure this out if you are interested. The river quest subdivision has impacted the river greatly. There is at least one group using two power boats and one drift boat. They are out every day with many different people. They are impacting the river as much as three guide businesses. Again I can think of ways to determine if they are a guide outfit. If they are not there needs to be some regulation to control their impact on the river. The turbidity is going to kill the river. Just talk to and look at the science and data. King fishing should not be allowed above the Soldotna Bridge and bait should not be allowed above Moose River. King escapement should be 50,000 There are too many boats fishing below the Warren Ames Bridge. Also too many private boats fishing Day and Night, all this would give erroneous fish counts. There has been a significant increase in unguided boats from the river Quest and castaway cove areas. There has also been a big increase in night fishing hours. In 2009 there was a significant increase in illegal guided boats, I.E. not registered as guides, but were obviously guiding clients. There have been fewer king salmon and, the size of the fish has greatly gotten smaller. I recognize this data from my personal journals, daily and yearly catches and information gathered from other fisherman. There are a significant number of illegal guide boats working the river before and after guide hours There seemed to be fewer boats on the river over all. This year was different because of water conditions. People were forced to fish areas they were not as familiar with. There were less guides, at least it felt like it. There were also many more non -guide boats because of the closures in the Northern Districts. I also feel like the commercial fishermen were allowed to fish when we were not getting our numbers of fish. I have worked in plant and I have seen the ridiculous numbers of King Salmon coming off of the beach when the King fishing in the river was at its worst for the season. Trends: A big change is that there were fewer boats (guided /unguided) on the river (lower part) last summer. Number of percentage had dropped. Use across all of the king salmon fishing area has increased and parks haven't followed the increases with data acquisition (or so I think). The management by adf &g has concentrated the early fishery on the main stern spawning fish virtually eliminating them from the river. The overall fishing increase has diminished the experience from both an aesthetic and productive (fish available to be caught) experience. the use by non- guided catch and release anglers has a disproportionate effect upon the resource, their mortality as inflicted upon the fish (c &r king salmon) potentially far exceeds their annual limit (2) and I wonder of the wisdom to allow anyone to continue to fish (remember guides don't fish) without regard to their individual impact upon the fishery. When fishing is slow such as the 2009 season, many folks get frustrated and will go hunting fish in a more desperate fashion than when the fish counts are higher. You won't have to worry about so much river usage due to the fact that the king and silver runs have been greatly reduced by the commercial fisheries in the saltwater. The Kenai River would not be so heavily used if there were quality alternative fisheries readily available to the public. Our state government has determined the high economic value of sport caught salmon, but has refused to invest in quality fisheries! Other Specific Management Actions for the Entire River Advanced permit/reservation system for sport users and leave no trace class required to get trip permits All boaters to have a coast guard license especially the park rangers All enforcement needs to be on the same page. 1 agency can't conflict w /another Allow Anchoring During Silver Season Only With a 20min Rule. I Fish With a Lot of Women Who Often Need To Use The Restroom Facilities Especially During That Certain Time of the Month. I or my Clients Should not have to Lose Our Fishing Spot for This Needed Restroom Time. When it comes To Successful Silver Salmon Fishing, Location, Location, Location. Any of the above not for guides, public only information training Close to motors in the swan sanctuary year round Course covering etiquette, safety, navigation, proper catch and release Develop designated riverside camp sites for boat access users on the Upper River (supply fire ring, level tent platform, bear -proof food storage containers) Do some undercover programs to bust illegal guides, unfair competition for legal guides Eliminate use of motors on drift boats once in River Corridor Enforce anchoring rules on drift boat Mondays. Establish a speed limit on the lower river which could be enforced with radar Get the internet going for info exchange public and private. Guided drift boat day on the lower Kenai for kings would be really nice give people a great experience. Have aft X 5 inch bright yellow stripes down the Port, Starboard and stern of private and rental boats Hire some effective law enforcement personnel. How about distinguishing between lower, middle and upper regulations instead of just writing "blanket" regs that are usually written for the lower and unfairly effect middle and upper users. I am 100% against all boaters wearing PFD's, it should be a personal decision I have seen silver salmon anchors left overnight and I would strongly suggest that you confiscate these and fine the violators. We have a new trend developing where guides get off anchor for a "long potty break" and leave their buoy in the water when they leave. If a guide service has a refuge permit on the upper river they should not be allowed to come down river or they can trade with a guide that wants to fish in the upper sections. This will keep some of the guide numbers down in the middle river and the drift boat wakes will stop damaging banks. Include education on proper fish handling for catch and release Kenai River Guide Academy for recreational users as well as for guides Less dock tie ups at Bings, but more bank to fie up's. Make it more like Centennial camp ground. Less guides Make more bank fishing areas avail. To fish for the people who don't have access to a boat. Quit closing more areas to fishing. Mandate private boat operation licensing More drift boat accessible restrooms, Floating port a potty's locations such as Big Eddy Hole More education on how to use Jims landing with loading or braking down boats More enforcement before Gam and after 6pm. Ban the use of alcohol for any boat operator More enforcement of fishing regulations esp. in no bank fishing areas More law enforcement on the river during seasons OTHER than King Season. No guide hours /days...limit guides to 1 trip per day/5 starts per week/12 hours (or whatever) per day with starting time entered into logbook and boat/operator has to be off the water upon conclusion No powerboats above upper Killey to Skilak lake septl- 30 No time limit for guides, how about giving us something? Non Guided power boat operators should be educated and not allowed to just launch and fish. There is boating safety and the issue of understanding the Kenai River and how to operate safely, PROTECT OUR FISH Reduce guide numbers Remarks regarding pfds "Dumb and Stupid" Require interpretive interactions with all users...history of area, dangers and understandings of why said regulations and management is in play.,, with understanding comes acceptance Require proof of insurance for all boaters to operate a boat on the Kenai River Require proper human waste management Stiff penalties for alcohol use by boaters Stop the KRSMA Board from meeting so often; this would help cut -down on excessive regulations Support PFD`s, but NOT Type 1 for guides! They are too cumbersome and that is why no one wears them!! Take motors away There are about 5% of the boaters guided and more that don't honor traditional drift areas. There is NO anchoring in channel issues during Silver season!!! Trophy fishery fC &R only Buy out east side set netters or fish only 1 net. Un- uniformed launch monitors We need to limit USERS during peak times -not how users access the fishery. In other words, limiting guides, less guide hours, or less guide days actually CONTRIBUTE to crowding if we don't limit users. Its simple supply and demand; if the demand remains constant but we limit or further restrict the most popular and safest way to access the resource, we have just added to the problem as users spill over (balloon) into other ways to access the resource. Example -cut guide days /numbers /hours but leave demand for a big king the same, and we will have MORE illegal guides, MORE rental boats, and MORE untrained, unsafe boaters on the Kenai River Add another drift only day for all fishing Another launch and take out facility below Beaver Cr. (Warren Ames Bridge area) Areas closed to bank anglers should have platforms installed and be reopened!! Close Kenai River below Skilak Lake for 2 Miles for King Salmon Fishing to let Spawning Kings do their thing. Also Close All Areas to Bank Fishing for King Salmon Where It is Already Closed to Boat Fishing for King Salmon. Close to motors in the swan sanctuary year round Eliminate use of personal (one person) boats (mandatory size and white water rating) END sub contract guiding...bonafide employees...workman's comp, withholding, etc... Enforce coast guard boating regulations Enforcement also needs to show some common since and give all users the benefit of the doubt, Enforcement of improper bank development by property owners Guided drift only days from Skilak to Warren Ames may Oct I believe that it is your obligation to revoke certain boat dock permits in the river channel that simply does not belong to the land owner. LET FISH ENTER OUR RIVER -1 ;on- F,11 Other comments about drift only issues rati .r1C Limit the number of people in the little dinky boats Manage all salmon fisheries for healthy escapement goals- -not just the kings and reds! Need to permit and regulate guide businesses not guides, only permitted guides can advertise sell fishing charters on the Kenai river, require a Guide- client agreement between guide business that provides the service and the client, for consumer protection No motoring back up steam with a drift boat and motor Wakes are huge No power boats in swan sanctuary Sept 1 -30 Prohibit camping on river banks during Sockeye runs on the Upper River. Quit making new regulations until existing regulations are enforced. Reduce private boat numbers We don't all need a pfd when was the last time someone drowned on the lower river Other comments about use limits or the mandatory registration system concept Alaska waterways should be open to everyone. If the state wants to restrict access to the river, I would rather have the Federal Government manage the river. Other western states encourage use and provide much more access to rivers than the State of Alaska does. Citizens should not be told by government when and where they can fish Don't limit the guides in the areas that we make our living in, (historic use applied) Fishing changes. I might book in winter and have to change river segment the day before the trip I'm a guide and this is how I make my living. It wouldn't work for me. Ws getting complicated if we start this. Limit last three weeks of July No because I need to be able to book trips on one days notice and not being able to register would hurt my bottom line or require me to give my clients a less successful trip due to user restrictions. NO NO NO Not Acceptable for any Reason. Would you do the same with Commercial Set netters and The Commercial Fleet? Permit only registered Alaskan residents. Please, this isn't Oregon. (yet) Reducing angler numbers and annual fish harvest is the only to sustain this once greatest river on earth. More toilets just mean more shit. Some days I don't decide were to fish until I wake up at 4am so to have to register before I leave at 4 am is crazy and not a benefit to anyone. It become useless none essential information and has no benefit to the fishery. This should apply to all boaters not just guides and all boats, power and drift TOO Slippery of a slope!! Alaska State Park not PRESERVES We are doing this an the upper river and I can't guide there. Now do you think I feel about permits. We don't have enough enforcement now -how would this be enforced? We need to be limited it just needs to be a sellable item for the permit holder A drift boat with an electric motor would solve a lot of problems. You can have the peace and quiet that makes that area so special and yet provide access to remote areas and provide older guides the chance to use the area. -no noise pollution, no water pollution Also some guides may have slight disabilities which they could not run a drift boat Cunningham Park needs the ramp access to be reopened and parking expanded!!! At least a drift boat pullout Kasilof style ramp!! Drift boats are bad for the river when anchors are dragged. They also lead to congestion because of the nature of the fishery, "start at the top in the morning and work downstream. I am closing in on 60yrs of age, I can still do it but prefer not to. What about all the older people that have been fishing this river for many years? Do you suggest that they be shut out of fishing from their power boat just to add more drift days? That's Not Right! think we will kill the king salmon run if the river goes to drift fishing e >F au 1 would not be able to participate in a drift boat only fishery as I have had my back operated on. This would require one to either leave the fishery or to hire someone to fish on drift only days. If guides were allowed to fish on drift boat days, I would sell trips to my clients but I would not personally guide the trips, I would have my hired guides perform the trips l'm only on the upper. It would cost me too much money to buy a drift boat. Most power boat operators will check all of these without one concern about the good it could do for the river to have more drift only days, No more rules on powerboat areas, need to limit non- guided days and trips on the lower river, we have from Gam to 6pm Tuesday -Sat that's what we base are business on, don't take anything from that base besides eliminating less people, let them have the after hours, that's how it set up the get free day and after and before 6 Physical limitations prevent use of Drift boat. Physically unable to row all day Some of us older guides can not row a drift boat any more and it would take money out of our pockets since we would not be able to guide on those days. There are not enough drift boat take out locations on the lower Kenai to support this. They should open the Upper River to power boats if they want to close the lower and the middle to us. With this same thought process, there should only be days for power boats. There should be only days for guided power boats. There should be days for only power boats with women guides. The list can go on and on, There are enough regulations, if interest groups /people want these types of fishing, "traditionally" they haven't been here. Go someplace else!!! Young man's game. Lots of people physically unable to use resource. A drift only fishery would also open a new business for drop offs and pick ups. The peace and quiet of the drift only fishery would be a great asset and would provide clients with a memorable experience. The "meat fishing" mentality is something that needs to be down played. A reasonable possession limit should be imposed on those clients who think they have to return from vacation with hundreds of pounds of fish. A feel good solution to a special interest group. Not what is best for the river and the public which uses it! Add drift only days to Refuge section of Middle River. Adding guided drift only days from Skilak to Warren Ames would reduce numbers of users, help control hydrocarbons, turbidity, help keep some pressure off of fish, and create an enjoyable atmosphere for clients and guides. I own a power boat and drift boat. I only use my power boat from Skilak to centennial for guided trout fishing. I am strongly for more drift only days and would love to see Skilak Moose River be a drift only. Motor use only to get across Skilak. Additional drift only days are an unrealistic management option given the limited number of launches (i.e. take outs). Also without the additional "anchor prohibited" areas and prohibition of anchor dragging the impact on the resource will be significant and will also increase conflict between user groups. Not everyone can row a drift boat but if the river is drift boat only then increased anchor use, and conflict, will arise. Anchor use is a problem with a drift only fishery just as over crowding in certain holes with power boats are a problem of monopolization of the holes by a few! Allow fishermen to fish out of the type of boat they desire too. As stated above. If the issue is to try and preserve the great king fishing on the Kenai while still offering the greatest experience, then it is a no- brainer that drift boats offer both. Politics and pocket books should not ever enter into saving a declining resource! Drift boats offer the answer to every issue, (no wakes, quiet times, great experience when catching a big king, etc) My clients would never fish from a power boat, and are always commenting how great the Kenai would be if it was drift only!!! Both you and I want to preserve this wonderful river. Power boats tear it up. It is not rocket science that needs to be used in determining what power boats do to the river. It is not the elimination of power boats that I am advocating. Just that we work toward a result that will help keep the Kenai from deteriorating any further and start in the direction of recovery. Come on people -wake up! More drift days would help save the river. Drift boat fishing is preferred by an increasing number of anglers. Having another drift boat day would increase the user groups allowed to fish on the river without having conflict from powerboats. Even if we just added a drift boat day on Tuesday on the Middle river, drift boats would probably (hopefully) not come to the lower river to fish. There are ample takeouts along the middle stretch of the river. There is the Moose River, Smiley Rock, End of the road, Swiftwater Campground, and Centennial Campground. Other states have access to many rivers at approximately 5 mile intervals. The access we have seems reasonable enough to support one additional drift boat day at least in the middle river. This proposal was discussed at the last board of fish meeting and I expect that it will be discussed again at the next one. Drift boater are catching more and more fish on the Mondays. It use to be a day for the river to catch its breath but the drift boaters are taking many Kings and not giving the river a day off as needed. Drift only days will take away fishing opportunities for general public, because it wit require additional boat purchases for them and it won't change guided fishing most already have drift boats. Drift only days would increase exploitation of the king runs as it is on Mondays the drift boats that are out their do really well Drift only for the Middle is a good idea but should not exclude guides, Drift only on the Lower has a lot of problems before it could be implemented. Drift only is a great idea and should be put on the table ASAP. Also the use of motor boats on drift only days to access places on the river should be stopped, No motors unless you have a permit to access remote property that cannot be accessed any other way than with a power boat. We need to stop all motor traffic on drift only days. Drift only is pushed by the young guys without a coast guard license Drift only options are not feasible at this time given the limited amount of launch /take out areas available. Also, drift only loses its appeal when power boats are still allowed to "run" up and down the river, thereby creating the wakes that drift boats find difficult. In addition, "drift only" is a fallacy when anchoring is still allowed making "holes" difficult to access for a good portion of those drift boating. unless anchor fishing is also regulated the "drift only" option is not feasible. For a limited comparison of fisheries and issues associated with a drift only fishery the Kasilof offers some insight. Drift only should only be added if it is proven that there is a biological or ecological impact that can be rectified with the removal of power boats from the river and if guides are permitted to participate. The current popularity with the drift only days is more the lack of competition from guide boats than that of the actual drifting. With all the 'professionals" removed from the river, catch ratios increase for the private angler. I also do not feel that any boat should be permitted to anchor while fishing similar to the regulation in "people hole" on the Kasilof. Drift only, only if I am able to guide on those days. Drift-only days limit access to certain user groups. Some users are physically unable to row a drift boat. Allowing electric motors on drift boats on drift -only days would provide access to all users including elderly and disabled users. Electric motors would eliminate the wakes and erosion associated with running a drift boat upriver to re -drift a section of the river. Electric motors produce zero hydrocarbons, no noise, and can be solar charged. My 20' drift boat with one guide and four passengers is easily handled with a 36 volt electric motor. I can cross Skilak Lake and back -troll down to Bing's Landing twice on a single charge. Erosion, increased pressure on fish, dangerous motorboat operators, low holing, wakes, etc. All affect the user experience and the sustainability of the fishing. Everyone that wants more drift only days has never rowed the Kenai River in July. This past July and August with waters at flood stage, debris and logs sweeping down the river made driftboating, especially anchored drift boats, dangerous as they cannot move quickly and must anchor to give the oarsman a very needed break. Heck yes....everyone rows for the king fishing I am not opposed to the use of motors for transport on Skilak Lake. This is just a logistical and safety issue of crossing that lake (upper river outlet to upper Skilak campground) after a Canyon trip. However, motor use in areas like first 3 -4 miles of the Middle Kenai during trout season and Lower Kenai in July has become insane, A drift boater (guide or private) simply cannot enjoy a quality trip in these areas without being tossed around by motor boat wakes all day. In my experience, the worst wakes come from the drift boats with motors. 1 don't think "drift only' days are going to improve over crowding. If anything, it would be worse because of boat launch issues for drift boats. The lowest place to take out is Eagle Rock, unless the boat had a kicker to pull out at Kenai dock. But, who wants to do that? Such a long float between the two ramps and tides to take into consideration. Also with Eagle Rock being private, think of the advantage they could take on the users by massive increase in fees etc. I encouraged the parks to make the river drift boat friendly since the 80's by making more drift boat access points for launch and take out since they can be launched and retrieved without a 'developed landing'. But this has not been the policy of parks at all because of the resistance of power boaters to any preferential treatment of drifters which is folly especially with the consideration of the lesser impact by drifters (even powered drifters). For a drift friendly river to function the boaters need to have access at least every four miles of river to make it so they can do a drift in a reasonable amount of time and allow for fishing. I know of people who would have considered a non powered boat for purchase but because of access they bought a power boat. I feel that additional drift only days would help enhance the salmon runs and make for a more pleasurable experience for those of us who prefer drifting. It would enhance the salmon run by dramatically decreasing the number of anglers on those days. ON THE UPPER RIVER, THE NUMBER OF SPAWNING KINGS IS DECREASING! 1 feel that drift Mondays have really screwed Tuesdays the drift boats are way more effective than you people think you need to be out there and see it you are a joke if you don't see the trend 1 have drift boat guided for many years. I can sincerely say that I became mostly a power boat guide because nothing ruins a drift boat day faster than motor boat wake. To say it is drift boat "fishing" only and allow power boats to "travel" up and down is negating the experience. I have lots of comments: drift only advocates need to be careful what you ask for here, and please think this one thru, considering the balloon effects that will come with this somewhat seemingly simple issue. At first glance, "drift only" seems a natural direction, as it appears easier on the resource in nearly every way! HOWEVER, please consider that we have severe access issues already -with a drift boat you need TWO access points, TWO vehicles, TWO parking places! And, we already have safety concerns, at least I do! Put a bunch of beginner drift boaters on a fast and cold glacial river and watch boats sink! Also, most folks are in good enough shape to row all day long, thus anchoring becomes increased, with that, crowding in popular spots as people don't and won't move (remember the People Hole on the Kasilof River just 8 years ago, as anchored boats caused big social issues Also, dragging of anchors, as most anchors wont hold in main current -thus we have more habitat destruction as spawning grounds are ripped up. Illegal guiding will likely increase with this too, as DEMAND for a skilled guide remains the same BUT another day is taken away from a power boat guides. Also adding to the increase in illegal guiding activity is the fact that a good used drift boat can be bought for $3 -$5k, instead of $15 -30K1 I think guides should be able to fish all drift only days. I think that a single additional day wouldn't be bad!! But there are going to be a volume of "locals" who will be limited by this. This would also increase the harvest, which I know is your ultimate goal!! Improve drift boat access by reopening the Cunningham ramp and I would support an additional drift only day. Access first!!! A much larger issue to me is the illegal or unregistered guiding, And the lack of Kenai River specific boating education. Mandatory PFD'S is an absolute JOKE!!! How many lives would this save in a year ZERO!!! If someone feels unsafe they as an individual can don a PFD!! I think that drift only fishing is popular on the existing Mondays and has very little impact on the River. On drift only days, anglers have had good to excellent success despite some claims that drift boat fishing isn't very effective. I think things are fine just the way they are now. However, if you would like to add more drift days, open Sundays to guides with clients in drift boats only. And also Mondays to guided drift boats. Let the public keep Sundays in their power boats, guides in drift boats only. If it went to all drift only, or close to it, it would slow a lot of people down that are unable to use a drift boat. If we add more drift only days there definitely needs to be a law against anchoring on those days. Many of the private drift boat users are either too lazy or uneducated enough to row. They spend the majority of their time on the anchor and plug up the hole rather than take turns working it like most drift boat users do on the Kasilof. It would become a contest of who gets to the hole first to take the best anchor position like the current drift boat Monday's are turning into. If you have the passion to participate in any of the various fisheries on the Kenai River you go...with whatever watercraft you have available...drift only and guide limits are no panacea to the problems encountered on a daily basis on this river...one only has to look at the section above Skilak to Kenai Lake to u nderstand/realize this,,,guides have been limited for as long as I can remember and it has been drift only for most of the section I drift for nearly as long...and what fishery's use has grown /exploded to become the second busiest (aka 'crowding) in the state...THESE AREN'T THE KINGS DEERWWW quit pandering to each special interest group attempting to manipulate the regulatory process to their advantage...improve the infrastructure providing access...educate ALL users of the resource equally...I've always thought of most importance on the Kenai River is not the size of the king salmon, the abundance of the red salmon, the tenacity of the rainbow trout nor the physical beauty of lands that surround this watershed that drains the central Kenai Peninsula but our ACCESS to it and ability to provide the spark that ignites the passion we derive from plying it's waters, living on or within a short distance of its banks, consuming it's fish...l'm sure that if the Kenai were less accessible (across the Inlet, Russia) a lot fewer of us would be enjoying it's bounty but am equally certain that this debate would still be taking place...just in higher income circles It would be great if the upper section of the middle river from Skilak Lake down to the end of the refuge or Skilak to Bings landing became drift only. Lots of pressure on trout from powerboats. Big trout seem to shut down many days from motor noise and being drifted by multiple times by power boaters. It would help the fishery and by that I mean more salmon would make it to their spawning areas, and the trout and dolly fishery won't be fished so hard... Just look at the upper Kenai. Adding drift days will not ease crowding in the long run and it will create many other problems. Leave Drift boat issues as is. Fewer motors can only be good for a natural river system... More peaceful, more wildlife sightings less crazy drivers and more skilled boat operators Lower Kenai River not good drift boat water Make the whole Kenai River "Drift Only My main problem is that the refuge below Skilak from mid Aug. to end of Sept. is turning into the lower in July. Being waked by the powerboats kills the refuge fishing experience. No drift boat days it will just lead to guides using drift boats as they already do, and with no enforcement, they just laugh daily about the non enforcement of the drift days already, every Monday it goes on it's not a joke it's the law, On drift only Mondays there is way too many King Salmon Caught. When the river is all quiet like on Mondays in July the kings bite really well. It is not uncommon for a person who can fish well to catch and release 10 kings on drift only Mondays. I think this is very harmful to the King run because of mortality. People need to figure out the LOWER KENAI IS NOT A DRIFT ONLY RIVER SAME AS ABOVE The lower Kenai is just not a very drift boat friendly section of river, I do understand that fishing from a drift boat on Monday in July is very successfui with dozens of kings per boat landed, but this is due to very few boats on the river and the fish are allowed to stack up and the pie of fish is shared by fewer boats and anglers, if only 10 -100 powerboats were on the river on a given day success rates would be even better than drift only days. The main supporters of more drift only days are only trying to hurt the guiding industry. By taking one more day away they know power boat guides will loose a day's income. If you add a day of drift boat fishing you will make it even more crowed on the power boat days! Just look a Super Tuesday. There are not enough boat launches in the lower river. You can't use a motor making it almost impossible for some boaters to go against the tide. The number of drift boats on Mondays in July has substantially increased, especially around the area of the Pillars and down. The number of fish harvested and released may be much higher than thought (no estimates). Lower turbidity results from fewer power boats and catch rates likely increase. The only ways that drift only fishing would work in my mind is if we made it catch and release. Then you might save the fishery some thing need to be done The right thing to do is to turn Kenai into drift only river Hard to use drift boat if competing businesses are using powerboat. The swan sanctuary should be made drift only year round or at least Sept 1st. The area has become severely crowded with motor boats and requiring it to be drift only would eliminate a lot of that overcrowding. In addition I have seen the swans showing up in mid Sept while the power boats are still ripping through their habitat. The Upper Kenai River comprises of just under half of the total river miles of the Kenai. It is drift only in that section and rightly so, The Middle and Lower Kenai should continue to provide access to those that choose to use a power boat. If a person chooses to use a drift boat and does not want to share this Alaska State Park area with power boats then they can use the Upper Kenai River, the Kasilof River, or go king salmon fishing on Mondays on the middle or Lower River. What other river can the power boaters use on the Kenai Peninsula? If the entire Kenai River were to go drift boat only what about the displaced anglers? What about those that could no longer participate? What about the property owners? The elderly? What a sad sad day that we have where one group is wanting to displace those that were there first. S The Upper River is drift only. The nearby Kasilof River is drift only. Mondays are drift only on the Middle to Lower Kenai during King Salmon fishing. Isn't this enough for one user group? If the drift boat fan club does not want to share the Kenai with other users they have other options such as the above mentioned Kasilof River, the Upper Kenai, and Mondays on the rest of the Kenai. If the Kenai was to add another drift only day it will only displace anglers that currently are able to access the Kenai River via a powerboat. Many guides already own a drift boat and those that do not will simply hire another guide to run the trips for that day thus adding more guides to the fishery. What about all those that cannot row a drift boat on the Kenai? One only has to look at the Kasilof River to see the guide dominant use there to see what will happen on the Kenai if a regulation like this was adopted, Simply open Mondays to guided drift boats to get a feel for what the rest of the week will look like during King season if you are in doubt. There is not enough access and parking for guided drift boat days. It would be a mess! There needs to be a limit of size rafts and drift boats. Too many one man vessels are starting to show up in the middle and l have seen a few on the lower in the last couple of years. Any boat under 12' should not be allowed on the river due to safety with power boats and sweepers, and numbers of people on the gravel bars. There should be no guides on Mondays ailowto even fish friends. There is way too much guiding taken place on Mondays. That is the number one way illegal guiding is happening. i This would also greatly help with hydrocarbon pollution O You want to clean the river up Take away the motors. DUH. Simple stuff. Other comments about guide /non -guide issues Some unguided users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa)," I would also add. Some *guided* users disrupt fishing for others when they use inappropriate fishing techniques (such as drifting when others are backtrolling or vice versa)." 99% of all guides on the river are providing the safest lowest impact trips on the river. Guides want to protect the river and teach people the correct ways to maintain a healthy resource, Guiding is only an extension of the general public, conflicts w/ guides comes from a very small of unethical guides, A business operation and its economic benefits should not be entertained when it comes to the health of the river, we are seeing smaller kings return each year now and 09 was one of the worse king counts in 20 years. If the fishing continues to go at this rate, the economics of the fishery will take care of its self when all you can catch on the Kenai is a 25 lb fish.... then you won't have to worry about somebody and their business being impacted by regulation, no one will come because the river was destroyed due to greed and entitlement thinking. Again, be careful here! Limiting guides and guide use will NOT solve social issues -if we limit anything at all, it needs to be LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF USERS! That is the key! Here is an analogy, if there are too many taxis and buses in NY City, is limiting the number of them or the days they can operate or the hours they operate going to make the roads less busy? NO- because there are still X amount of people that need to get from point A to point B! Why would the city want to limit and remove the safest, best trained operators, BUT LEAVE DEMAND FOR THEM THE SAME so as they be displaced by less efficient, more dangerous operators? By limiting guided use all you would do is increase illegal/unregistered guiding!! At least get your fees. Educate the general boater and allow the guides to set the example. Only the few on a bad day would set any type of bad example and most of the time it would be a misunderstanding more than a bad example!! Clients of the guide services provide a great deal of revenue for the peninsula and Alaska in travel, car rentals, dining, groceries and other purchases and services that they may partake in during their stay. Do not allow nonresident private boats. Everyone has to learn to drive a boat somehow, so we all have to be tolerant of these beginners but private boaters that are fishing, drinking beer, baiting up, untangling a line, and chatting with his buddies while back trolling in a crowd can cause problems. Everyone should be following the same set of regulations. The Kenai River is the only river in the state of Alaska that divides guided /non guided anglers. Why? Reducing guide numbers will not reduce the perception of crowding on the Kenai, One only has to look at the Upper Kenai River which has a guide limitation in place and "Sundays" during July to see what I mean. From past experience, I have seen many "close calls" with private users because of lack of experience on the water. I have witnessed Very Poor boat handling skills by private users throughout the summer and have had to dodge and weave them from being hit while on the water. (Watch Pillars on a Sunday during July) I think a lot of this is stemmed from panicking and lack of experience on a busy river system that can sometimes be tricky to navigate during certain water levels. Go to the lower river in July on a Sunday and see if limiting guides solves the problems that are targeted (fishing crowds, safety, courtesy, boat ramp problems, etc.) Guides are easy to target because we have our 6" numbers displayed for the world to see. Public use is basically anonymous, they have no identifiers. So when there are issues with specific boaters, they can't be "called in" like guides can. Each user should be accountable, so a permit system to track who is on the river when and an identifier for each vessel would, in my opinion, greatly improve unguided behavior because all of the sudden they aren't just an anonymous user anymore. Most guides are professional and courteous, to each other and to non guided users. There are always going to be a few rotten apples in the bunch, but it's probably pretty easy to deal with these guys on an individual basis because once again, if there is a complaint about a guide, I'm sure you guys get to hear about it. Another issue with unguided use is the congestion of the boat ramps (upper) due to raft inflation and assembly right on the ramp. This causes huge bottlenecks and should be addressed. I believe that unguided use has a far greater and more detrimental impact on the river than guided use. I believe that unguided users should have to have courses of safety and etiquette the same as guided. !think that a non guided boat operator can dump his boat in the Kenai and not have the proper boating skills to operate on a crowded river. Guides are required to have a Coast Guard License more for safety than any other thing. Private Boat owners should have to pass a test and have a license to operate on the Kenai as well. After all vehicle operators have to have a license to drive on highways, therefore boat operators should be subject to the same. (More revenue for the state, as well as safety precautions) part I guide primarily on the upper river, a few days per season on the middle. None on the lower, due somewhat to the crowding issue. In the refuge guiding numbers have not increased since the late '80's. The increased impact in the refuge is due to more private anglers. 1 avoid trout fishing near private anglers, unfortunately I am not given that same respect by some private anglers. I have problems with commercial and non commercial users. The problem is jerks and they come in all forms. think that generally most of the guides on the river follow the rules and regulations. I feel like the guides are checked and watched a lot more closely than private anglers by law enforcement. I feel that we should all be held to the same standards. Two other areas where I feel there should be more enforcement are pirate guides, and guides who use the refuge without incidental permits, I Think That Private /Public Boaters and all Rental Boaters should be required to do a Written and Physical Save Boat Handling Qualification Test. Look What the River Guides are Mandated to do! Ask Yourself, How Many Registered Guide Boats Cause Accidents, How Many Private /Public/Rental Boats Cause Accidents in the Last 5 Years? would recommend submitting a new regulation to provide ONE trip a day in July for at guides (all day trip only, no half day) similar as Kasilof River which regulates one trip a day. TWO trips a day for king salmon in July: causing to damage /erode riverbanks due to excessively traffic boats and reducing accident, preserving number of 2nd runs king salmon to spawn. It will help to increase approximately 25% to 50% king (late run salmon) to spawn. I have noticed more guides are providing only one full day trip(s) in July which I have supported. It is excluding May, June, August, and September. It also helps guides to reduce their aggressive and competitive behaviors. ONE FULL day trip(s) will ease their stressful, envies, and irrational behaviors. If guide #'s are your concern get rid of the ones that don't take the industry seriously and can pass a drug test and can not get a coast guard license. The river is getting a lot more pressure but it is from private use. Too many guides are trying to stay afloat and have been taking anchorage clients out and the next day the have a brand new boat and in the holes following the guides. I have a no Alaska client policy. If guides are required to be "certified and take safety classes then ALL boaters should be required to take a safety education or boater certification class. If guides have to take a week long guide class, get their coast guards license, etc...(Which I believe is a good thing). Then the privates should have equal responsibilities to know the river, etiquette, etc... if someone wants to fish the lower river during king season they know what there are in for more management isn't the answer. If you are going to limit guides give permits to the guides that are fish for the previous season and keep in mind that lodges need certain of permits too. Many of the local guides depend on these lodges as does the community and the business owner, if you remove X number of guides, it will just be replaced with double the number of private boats. Impact from guided use is typically far less than from public use. If the public was as educated as guides are, i.e., required to take the training and/or certification that guides are required to have, I think many of these issues would be far less prevalent. Just a few guide are overly aggressive and rude -get rid of them and you get rid of most of the problem. Limit everyone equally and allow fishing only during specific hours. Reduce the number of opportunities to compare and complain by putting all users in the same river at the same time. I am against additional regulation but if it protects the resource remove ALL users from the river DO NOT isolate one user group from another, as sport anglers we need to all be united not divided. Limit guides to the 2005 standards make it a permit system "with transfer ability of permit' that will put a freeze on the number of guides and transfer's will be "buy- outs" turn it over to ADF &G and problems solved. Limiting guides and limiting guide use are two different issues. I believe that there should be a limited entry system for guides with a maximum number of Kenai River guide permits. Look to the Upper River in the fall if you think limiting guides will cap use. The river will always attract a lot of use unless the fish runs fail handling that use is the problem. I think requiring users to take a course that teaches safety and etiquette will do more to solve the problems than reducing use. It won't stop some folks from being fools but it will help. Many unguided boats don't know the rules. Most Guided boats are already very courteous to the non guide boats and the non guided boats can and sometimes do take advantage of this. Non guided use has increased in all segments of the Kenai. While guided use has decreased or stayed the same. Non guided users should be managed with consideration of their accumulative impact upon the resource whether it is from individual fish mortality or a cumulative use force upon aesthetic or biological /aquatic /riparian areas of concern, Nonguides should also have to complete a course much like the Kenai Guide Academy before being allowed to access the Kenai from Kenai Lake Warren Ames Open forum to help the river. Open the time slot for guides to spread river use through the day. Pitting one user group against another has been turned into a science on the Kenai River! Numerous quality fisheries would greatly reduce user conflicts. Our government has not wished to invest in the real solutions to high usage of our fishery resources. They will invest in anything that loses money; they will not invest in planting king salmon worth 000 -9000 dollars per sport- caught fish to the Alaskan economy! Raise Motors to 70 hp Rental boats cause a lot of problems. Illegal guides are the most inappropriate and aggressive users on the middle river. The guides are very very important to the economic stability of the area. The increase of nonresident nonguided is a very important issue to focus on 1. They fish all hours and can easily cheat the system bait, not tagging fish and more.... The last question is bias and leading. You are assuming over use. By who's definitions? The mass number of guides are not good I admit, but at the same time there are more and more and more unguided boats coming from all over the U.S.,(OR. WA. CA. ID that are fishing on the river. They are on the river 24 hours a day, and they also have most or all of the same techniques the guides have. I feel with this going on and getting worse and worse every year have everyone fishing the same hours and give the river a break everyday. The number of guided anglers hasn't increase near as much over the past few years as the number of private anglers. Everyone has a right to use the river; it just seems that the finger is always pointed at the guides, while the majority of the increase lately has been from the public. The peninsula needs the guiding industry to support lodges, stores, restaurants, everything revolves around fishing on Kenai Peninsula.... how to manage The private guys go 24/7. If you want to look at a problem look at Sundays in July. The river is open to use by everyone, People who think the river is too crowded usually don't fish there anymore. They complain that there are too many people fishing and they want to fish there by themselves. There are plenty of people who enjoy themselves on the river daily and accept that it is a river many people fish. The river should be managed for use by all stake holders, management of the resource should be for all users and should be managed to protect the resource most of all. By pitting users against each other, using regulations to do so will cause more problems and bad feelings. The river resource should be protected most of all and the public (guided /unguided) should be regulated to achieve this goal and these regs should be applied to all evenly, as the general public. The rules should be the same for all. The biggest mistake that has been made to date in regards to managing the Kenai was to separate the different users groups. It should be the same hours, days, and drift for all and not give special treatment to one user group, The unguided boats are very dangerous on the river. There needs to be enforcement of the rules so both user groups can work together. My biggest problem is local people not knowing how to handle their boat in a congested area. You need to have some type of a class or test to be given to everyone before you can operate a boat on the river. There were a lot less guides this year and I saw more careless boating by nonguided boats I fee! guides help the PACE of the river fishing I also think that out of state guides and nonresident boaters don't know or respect the Kenai River or its fisheries These questions are very loaded; there are many dynamics within these issues. There shouldn't be this guided vs. nonguided issue. Guides aren't always the problem, just seem to be the only ones regulated and an easy target for more regulation. Boat handling skills is a learned task and there is /was a learning curve for all of us. All of the users have good and bad days. Economics will play an important part in the uses of the river by ALL USERS!!! This area is visited by a lot of out of state fishermen, and if we don't have guided trips for them alt of the businesses will lose a lot in more than one way. This builds a trap on the questions answered. First, the non guide has issues with to many guides but this is due to boating inexperience and not the fact that guides are fishing. Same number of boats, all non guides would not create an issue but since guides are a user group the non guide complains about them. Guides are educated on fishing the Kenai but there is no requirement for the non guided angler. The guide is the best ADFG on the river as we watch and report misuses by user groups to preserve the resource. Stuth This river is ran for economics and not for the fish that sucks save the fish and you will save the economy the non guides devastate this river by catching too many fish after all you go home open your eyes!! I have been here longer than most of you people trying to fix this place you want to fix it call me Too many guides Un guided non- resident anglers are increasing, is not fair that a non resident who owns a boat or a friend with a boat can fish the river while a resident without a boat cannot fish, management should be based on residency not guided or non guided just like hunting regs are. Non resident non guided anglers and/or private boat operators should have to take a course before fishing on the river or they have to fish with a guide. Unguided anglers need to share more burdens in reducing impacts perhaps a river /boat fishing closure from 10pm to Sam during peak seasons We have missed our opportunity to decide guide limitation issue in court when the state cowered in the face of the lawsuit threatened by a few big guides. Of course when the Kenai River Classic is allowed to overcrowd the River on 2 of the twenty possible guided fishing days (10% of the season!) I guess that's OK? Other tournaments take their turn as well such as the Spenard Builders tourney. This just prostitutes our river. What constitutes "overuse "impacts Other comments about private development or visual impacts of development 33% is not enough. As a property owner I would be biased m Enforce rules already in place—why have rules if many are allowed to ignore them Fish habitat should be of utmost importance I care about a healthy riparian system and have no regard for property owners on or near the river!!! Most land on Upper Kenai is federal, either Forest Service or KNWR, and what is privately developed is in the flood plain On the Upper there is little private land that isn't already developed Only development needed is public boat launches Stop It All. When Will Enough Be Enough, When There is no Trees or Wildlife Left? Sure looks a lot better now then it was a few Years back when the banks were trampled down. The concern should be focused on the fish!!! And their habitat!! The people that buy the property and pay the taxes on said property have the right to build accordingly. The regulations in place at this time are more than enough. The Kenai River is NOT a wilderness experience, If that is what is wanted go into the wildernessfmmm Not within driving distance from the largest city in the state l!!!!! When bank side development is done to protect, should be done as much as possible. You have totally been wrong in issuing the boat dock permits and 50' setback easement exceptions for River Quest Subdivision and as a result, you have set an ugly precedent that needs to be reversed. There is a total lack of enforcement of the permit requirements and too much politics -river quest subdivision. There has been too much development. I was a land owner for 15+ years on the banks of the Kenai and my thoughts are it just continues to get worse. What is the story with the embarrassing eye sore that was allowed to occur at River Quest! Every guest that sees that from the river shakes their head in disbelief!! No more variances from the borough on the 50' set back. Enforce the rule. Just because they have a lot with a trailer on it does not mean they can put up a 3 story 7000 square foot home. In addition to permitting of docks, boardwalks, and erosion control. There needs to be some accountability in terms of enforcement. I am opposed to the Riverquest subdivision. State Parks apparently had no problem allowing that massive eyesore to be built. Now is someone wants to put in a dock....wel1, well have to do some studies and permits and more paperwork hmmm. If a property owner wants to put in a boardwalk or dock to protect their property or allow them to access the river easier, let them, I cannot believe the level of high density development has been allowed and why. In addition, I have waited for the angry public outcry and it has never come, This was a deal with the devil. I do not know enough about it to comment!! I think the lower river is an eye sore and is one of the reasons why I do not guide down there. Maybe leave a few trees on property instead of clear cutting all the way to the river, i.e. river quest, rw. rb in regards to question 3, look at riverquest. Many disregard rules of bank development and nothing is ever done -Break a rule Sorry, I didn't know -Lots of rule breakers benefit at the expense of the river habitat Put some teeth in enforcement or drop the rules Nothing wrong with development as long as habitat is not lost. People should be able to do maintenance to the structures they have (docks) without a permit. (Maintenance meaning replacing rotten boards, repainting, keeping structures sound, etc. Not changing overall structure or footprint of structure) this adds more work and cost for you all and is unnecessary red tape. Porters /Riverquest is a disaster. River Quest has created a huge demand on the river and is getting worse each year. This needs to be addressed and no such building project should ever be allowed to happen again. Allowing more docks on the river is also causing a conflict. Home owners put in a dock, tie their boat up to it then complain about their boats getting damaged from boat traffic, Allowing these docks and boat tie ups is creating the problem. Stop allowing more docks on the river. Riverquest is grotesque. The city planners should be appalled they allowed that to happen. More typical rape and pillage prostitution of the Kenai River! RiverQuest. How was this ever allowed to be developed to this extent with the regs that are the books? Stop all development within 50ft from river as required. No more development like riverquest should be allowed. The Kenai River is looking more and more like a city along the banks, to me and most of my clients it's getting disgusting. The major consideration for the development of the river is bank protection. This is also habitat protection. Compared to many other rivers that are highly used, the Kenai is one of the most commercialized rivers. The permitting process needs to be enforced. In the last two summers I have seen topsoil pushed into the river, riverfront lots clear -cut, backhoes digging in the river, structures built well within 50' of ORW, and 100% of private riverfront lots developed. To my knowledge, all work was done without the proper permits. The small boat docks that are currently approved are too dangerous. The river lots are so expensive owners should have more options and rights to developing their land. There are many docks, platforms, and houses/cabins on middle and lower Kenai River that are eye sores and takes away from the Kenai. Too late Who ever allowed the construction at River Quest within 50' of the Kenai should be run up the flag pole. What an eyesore! Other comments about Lower River actions A number of the above are interesting in nature and maybe should be tried on a trial basis. I would be real careful about rz M it tried volunteer basis. putting anything In concrete un i until u on a to T ba I Add one more drift only (guided day) Ali follow the same set of regulations such as days, hours, etc. Am I a broken record here? LIMIT THE USERS!!!! Not the boats, not the guides, not the privates...ALL users! Also, if you want to minimize congestion, then in actuality you should LIFT guide hours and guide days...NOT FURTHER RESTRICT THEM! Think about it: spread the effort over 7 days and 24 hours a day, and we have less congestion and less social issues! CRAM most effort into a 5 day, 12 hour a day week, and we have crowding! And if you further restrict it (drift boat days!) and try to cram the same amount of guests into 4 days a week or a 8 hour guide day, THEN YOU REALLY HAVE CROWDING! Boater education card for unguided boat drivers Do not allow the targeting of King Salmon (catch and release /harvest) above Slikok Creek Do not regulate at all. Grandfather in existing guides with day use no new guides simple just like they have done everywhere else. if you do the odd even system, guides on Sundays and Drift boat guides on Mondays. No special no guided fishing days. That will give each guide group 15 days of guiding where we presently have 20 -21. implement a reservation system for unguided power boats. Instead of making unenforceable laws about where to drive, a Kenai River Driving License would be much more appropriate. If you tell people where they should and shouldn't drive, it will work better that having State Parks pull them over and ticket them. Less guides Limit angler hours for all users from boats in order to reduce impact Limit guides leave the general public alone, otherwise, nothing will get done. Limit guides with a permit that is transferable Limit the number of user group classifications to one group...sport fishers Limit unguided to 5 days a week in July like guides are Local guides only i.e. Kenai, Soldotna and Sterling so they contribute to the economy Mandatory boat operator education (boating safety) Maneuverability downstream travel only in high density areas (no wake) More Enforcement on Sundays and Mondays. Lot's of illegal Stuff Going on During Those Days. No limits ever, except by turning historic use of powerboats back to the 2005 level make permits transferable with ADF &G problem solved. No non resident guides in July would solve some of the problem One guided trip per day Open all hours to drift boats guide and public Open bathroom facilities before the end of June at Big Eddy and riverquest. Reduce number of Gov. Employees, use newly available money to improve access. Take an honest look at what is causing the increase in July. The other months are not a problem so there has to be a reason. As I mentioned before I am sure the cause is from Fish and Game regulations. The guide numbers have not been going up they have been down. The more boats are from the private sector. The private boater is the fastest growing user on the river, you might start limiting them! The problem in the lower river is only the last half of July. Just address those days, Who would enforce this? There is no enforcement now! Bring on the Feds You could legally limit guide permits on the river thru competitive bid similar to the tractor launch at Deep Creek and Anchor Point. Other recommended Lower River boat capacities (actual numbers were entered in quantified database) I have not had the quality of a trip compromised by too many boats on any given day. I think limiting ONE user group is the wrong direction. it is wrong to limit guides only just like its wrong to limit private boats only; instead, lets explore the Idea of limiting total number of users on the river, otherwise rental boats, illegal guiding and untrained operator numbers will surely increase as the same number or users attempt to access this popular water with less trained professionals available. I think the number of private and rental boats has increased a lot and equally contributes to the problem. I would rather see every boat be a guide boat than regulation on number of guide boats. Impose the odd- even only if you impose a moratorium on guides at the same time, otherwise more guide boats will pop up immediately. Then, start issuing guide permits only on an as needed basis when a guide retires. Guide permits are not for sale by owner. One permit must be fished by the permit holder only. Not a limit set guide levels to the 2005 level and have a permit that's transferable. Other comments about Middle River actions A drift boat with a motor on it is a "power boat If you want to restrict powerboats in this area overall, I'm sure the "drift boats" would be happy to comply..... Close All King Salmon Fishing Below Skilak Lake for 2 Miles, Let Them Spawn. Do a study on what caused the decline in Kings in the Middle River, and what needs to be done to increase the number of Kings. Drift boats motoring upstream make a wake no larger than a powerboat, operating your vessel with common sense in relation to other boats is the important issue Drift only all year in Swan Sanctuary Eliminate powerboat trout fishing in middle river. Find more restroom areas Flat bottom boats only in middle river Skilak to Bings Landing. Guided trips on Mondays have turned that into a circus. No guides on Mondays. I would like to see the area between Skilak and the first private property at the keys as a drift only like the upper river If you're going to have more rules enforce them Increase enforcement in the Middle River It should be closed to all motors in the swan sanctuary; this would fix a lot of problems Limit guide numbers like Upper Kenai on Federal Waters from Skilak Lake down to end of Federal waters. More drift only days Motor restriction before July above upper Killey. New restrooms must be wheel chair accessible. No Camping allowed No camping on the middle river. Campsites have been seen left up for more than 2 weeks at a time. NO camping whatsoever No guided king fishing in July above Soldotna No personal (one person) water craft they are not rated fro flowing waters and are dangerous. One guided trip per day Open 3rd hole to kings Open season for reds but close the middle river to ALL king fishing above Naptown. Slippery slope!!! It's NOT your Park. Its OURS!!!! So someone is saying that a drift boat leaves a large wake going upstream. If you compare it to a power boat it is minimal. This particular question suggests someone has an agenda. I was going to say that who ever wants to restrict a drift boat kicker because of the large wake must be on crack. If drift boats with their 9.9 motors were the problem why do they have no wake zones on the Kenai where the big motored boats need to slow down (to a drift boat pace). Simply put, drift boat wakes are minimal. Tell powerboats to have respect for drift boats The Middle river is fine, work on the Lower River. Why can drift boat guys fish both middle and upper, while power guys can only fish middle? Work with Feds to limit use by all on Federal Waters in this area. Anchoring allowed all year Close more sections of river to protect spawners. Education!!! Education!Ifl Education!!!! 1 would like to see No King salmon fishing on the area between Skilak and Bings If you have a permit on one section of the Kenai then you cannot have clients fish another part of the Kenai River that requires a permit. Limit Upper River Competitive Use Permit Holders to number of days /boats in Middle River during peak trout season (August, Sept., and Oct) Make the Kenai a drift only river More Drift only days on Refuge section. Motor restriction from Aug. 15 -set 30 above upper Killey. No upper river refugee permits boats allowed in the middle. Odd -even in august September. Other comments about Upper River actions Better Parking developed for access to river /increase parking at Jims Upper Skilak. Education on how to manage human waste Give new upcoming guides 2 days per week in the refuge. I think returning carcasses to the river is fine especially when you explain the benefit of this action to your clients. I would support a reservation system that gave preference to local residents. Improve launch and parking areas at Jim's Landing Keep the upper river guides in the upper river. If they are so special to have a permit they should stay there and deal with it during the slow season. Limits should only be placed for safety or biological purposes in this area Manage the Bears, Not the People! Management of human waste and litter. 201 Additional general comments More parking for tourist. Keep them from parking at guard rail hole NO camping whatsoever. No Camping. No motor use allowed for a quarter mile radius where Upper Kenai enters Skilak Lake Open up a bear season and help the bears get back to knowing humans are bad and to stay away. Pack in- pack out program for human waste Require reservations for designated on -river camping sites and have max. of days limited to 3 Reservation system should apply to entire upper, limiting the refuge will only lead to crowding from bridge to sportsmans. The confluence of the Kenai and Skilak Lake (bottom of canyon) needs to be closely looked at during peak trout times, i,e, Sept! We need more enforcement (dueling chainsaws, really and limits on camping down here. Way too high of impact, and not enough revolving of users at this popular fall area. The more carcass management that is done, just brings in more bears. Waste management Boater education required for unguided boats Don't the fish die and become part of the "circle of life ",..quit wasting on "managing" carcasses...not a lot of success managing bears or people...The only way to insure bear /human conflicts don't occur is to remove one "user" group or both and nobody wants that. No camping except for controlled maintained campsites. Require the use of fire plans. No Fires. Add drift -only days in Refuge section of Middle River June, August, and September which also allows guiding. No camping. No fires. Boat Ramp monitors on weekends. No more mandatory education. No more user fees. Less development including `bank' projects. Walkways not visible from river OK. Move Sterling Highway away from Upper River. Again, the limitation of guides is paramount to all other proposals. Any restrictions placed on the general public are unnecessary, other than a requirement for boating operation and safety training. Place a moratorium on new guides while determining and establishing a maximum number of guide permits. Let attrition reduce the number of current guides. No guide permits to those who cannot show a history of active guiding, Any restrictions placed on the general public without limiting guides will never be accepted. Get'er done! Any additional fee is an absolute JOKE; we already pay huge amounts of money. This shouldn't turn into a "richmans" recreation!! Use the money that we pay for what we pay for!!! People expect the river to be busy. Its been busy, just as it is now for 30 years!! Why change now, how about we spend our efforts helping the fish. Manage the fish for the fish not the fishermen for the fish!! Are their going to be any more public meetings this fall if so when? Bings landing: Parking designated for vehicles with boat trails and designated parking for vehicles without a trailer attached. Bings landing: larger drift boat parking area at the boat launch. Bings landing: large signs everywhere "No fishing on dock!!!" Boat parking only Bings landing: larger dock Bings landing; larger boat launch. Buy out east side set netters and make the Kenai a trophy fishery. The Peninsula would have a thriving economy. Young people would have opportunities to make a living around here again. Management policies of the past 2 decades have slowly been killing the quality of the fishing. The local economy is now following, Poor fishing equals people going elsewhere to spend there hard earned dollars, Disappointed to see that this study was a guided/non guided one that also pitted drift versus non drift users. It should have been an honest effort to try and get everyone on the same page without the "leading" questions that were asked. But, for some strange reason it was about what expected. Don't over use the Kenai! Thanks for active management! I answered the q's for the company not for me personally as you can probably tell. 1 am fairly sure that none of my guides will complete a survey so your numbers should not get skewed from that. Drift boat only in July for all guided and non guided fishing. EASY skip the guide school and put it all info on the Internet with a biog....that way the public is involved with participating in the well being of the river, is saved, human resource is not wasted and everybody participates RIVER wins. The guide school is designed to get rid of the out of state guides and will fail miserably because its intent is all wrong. The RIVER is what it should be about not a bunch of self interests. EVERYONE should be able to enjoy the RIVER. The Kenai guides have always been a mismanaged clique, now these narrow minds will backpedal to get out of all the regs. that will ensue. How many out of state guides make up the advisory board? It's a joke. The analogy of the goose that laid the golden egg is appropriate. The guide association is killing the goose with its tight knit regs and narrow- minded thinking. It is an outrage. Furthermore, these problems do not exist in other communities i.e. Rogue River, Deschutes, Big Horn in Montana... these are rivers that I fish often and the huge resentment is not there. The guides have created a BAD public relations issue and again making some more wrong decisions. Like the Titanic... the ship is sinking and they are rearranging the furniture. Everyone agrees salmon rivers on the road systems are crowed. How do you decide who has the rights to fish on a public resource? Who make a bigger impact on the resource? A resident fishing 5 -30 days or a non resident fishing one time? Is it fair to restrict fishermen that use a guide and not restrict fishermen that own his own boat? Who make a bigger impact on the resource? A resident fishing 5 -30 days form his boat or a non resident fishing one or two times from a guide boat? I would like to point out Guides do not "fish' they provide anglers the equipment and fishing experience. Excessive governmental regulations are caused because of a lack of morality; many times regulations could be reduced by proper planning; all power corrupts, and governmental agencies demonstrate that very well without sufficient oversight by the public. The Kenai River usage is highly based on the health of its fisheries. Poor salmon management has been very helpful in reducing the usage of the Kenai River. The Kenai River is still heavily used today because anglers do not have other quality accessible salmon fisheries available to them. Great looking survey Guiding issues are most aptly controlled by economic forces. I do believe this. But, and this is a big but, there are people who guide who do not depend upon this industry for their livelihood much let alone income. Retirees and guides who are otherwise employed from other sources make the competitive economic forces function on a less than level playing field for those who derive all or most of their income from this profession. This should be considered when dealing with guide numbers. On the upper Kenai River (above Skilak Lake) there is opportunity for conflict between peoples and between guides and peoples (even though the numbers of guides is limited). It is obvious to me after a few altercations with people misbehaving that there is not a way to identify these people specifically those using a boat. It is like license to misbehave as there are no enforcement and no way to id those people. Therefore I recommend that every boat on especially the upper Kenai but across the whole river be required to have identifying numbers (or something specifically able to id that craft) regardless of how small they are. There is something inherently wrong with there not being a way to hold the misbehaving user responsible for his behavior. Finally, I would encourage parks to re- examine the erosion study. Perhaps an audit of the science. I believe that the erosion study completely missed the point of such a study and how it may relate to user contribution to erosion. You might say it missed the boat. Thank you I feel there is no need to limit guides or guide activity any further as the economy and numbers of kings returning has already started to lower the numbers. You guys are doing a great job. I do feel however any boater using this great river should definitely have to take some type of course for the safety of everyone. The guides aren't the problem in most cases. Thank you!! I believe as with the 35 horse power restriction that the 50 horse power restriction was, and is being abused. As a drift boat operator, it is very obvious when a 70 horse power boat goes flying by. I believe that all power boat operators should be subject to some kind of inspection and the start of the season and randomly sometime during the season. I also believe that there should be more random drug test done with powerboat operators during the season. As the river becomes more and more crowded it is a safety factor to have "high" guides running around in July. I also believe it is a contradiction to have a Kenai River Classic to raise funds for bank restorations when the participants are the ones who create the most problem with bank erosion, and as quoted 'there will never be a drift boat in the Kenai Classic it should be only drift boats, as no wake, no erosion. 1 believe this survey is all about Guided fishing. There are way too many private boats fishing all hours of day and night, they should also be limited. No one seems to care; I never see any fish and game, park ranger or other officer at night. Private boats are fishing on the Kenai at 3am no one checks how many Kings they harvest. I feel that boat overcrowding by guided and non guided users is fairly short- sighted of the grander issue. Personally, 1 think it really boils down to salmon runs declining- -which makes users fish lower and lower on the Kenai River. Everyone is trying to catch a fish on the tide, because few are making it up to higher fishable spots on the river that have been traditionally fished hard in King season. I feel that the Kenai should be a limited entry with years of experience being the factor of which it matters. The people that have spent years trying to build there lives and families by guiding and contributing to the community resident or non resident should be set at a higher standard than the new guides that doesn't truly know what being a Kenai guide truly means. I love this river and will die trying to protect it. I feel that the upper river permitted guides should have to perform their business in that area, I highly recommend every boater take a mandatory boating safety and rules of the road for the Kenai River. I hope whomever takes in this data does not use it to prove an already predetermined point of view. This has been done in the past, Also, unless the raping of Cook Inlet Salmon comes to an abrupt halt, all of this is merely academic. No fish no anglers no problem, Look at Bings Landing tomorrow, Oct, 13 2009. This is generally prime time Trophy Trout Season, no spawn =no trout. Of course, if this continues, we will not need YOU either, Have nice day. I love being a guide on the Kenai River, and hope everyone knows how special the river is. Everyone is out their trying to have a good time and should respect each other at all times. I think the number of guides on the Kenai River need to be capped or do like the commercial fisheries and have permit holders, I think this survey is a great idea and a great way to gather data to ensure that the Kenai river system maintains its integrity for next generations. I wonder what would happen if we stopped all fishing, commercially and recreationally for ten years Would a ten year study, reducing man's impact from a harvest perspective change and possibly preserve this amazing resource? I would like to keep informed of news and decisions regarding the study. I would like to reiterate that general boater education is a must for the Kenai River. Some unguided boaters are dangerous (as well as some guides) and are not required to have any boater education. This must change. Guides are required to take a class so should the general public! I would like to see allowing harvesting of seals in august or september by native alaskans, or anyone else that would use them for food. I am not native. There are getting to be more than enough of these seals. I have found that on any given day, me, my family or my clients will have 50% of the silver salmon we catch with seal bites on them. I have noticed an increase in the number of seals as well as the number of silver salmon showing seal hits. Also this year I know of at least 6 other silver fishermen telling me they to had seals take hooked silvers off their lines. I know of three other silver fishermen telling me of hooking seals and loosing their gear on them. I have read reports that in the lower 48, seals that are hooked die about 80% of the time, why not harvest them? If people think the requirement for a quality fishing trip is to fish where there are not many boats then I am sure they can find those places even on the lower river during the last two weeks of July. Quality fishing is in the eye of the beholder or fisherman! If you make it local guides only it would decrease the amount of guides. There is already a decrease, which you know, because of the number of fish and the lack of interest of fishing. Economy and flooding were major impacts this year. If you would like to call me and chat feel free to call me or e -mail. I'm concerned about the number of boats on all parts of the river. However I am also concerned about limiting guides or registration. As I stated before I do this for a living and need river access to book my clients. There are many lodges in Cooper Landing, Sterling, and Soldotna etc. that employ many guides often from out of state or very young,,.even new ones that have to learn the river when they arrive in the early summer. I live here in Cooper Landing year round and though I've only been guiding for a couple years I have fished the Kenai over 10 and have fished other rivers my entire life. So how do you go about limiting guides and limiting boat access to people like me who count on fishing to make a living. Thanks I'm in favor of decisions based on habitat/biology, not social or political. In general, I think the river is managed VERY well. Increase the number of seasonal boat fishing and bank fishing closure areas to protect spawning king salmon (e.g. swiftwater, sunken island, poachers). These should also include areas below College Hole. King salmon fishing should be more severely restricted above the bridge and especially above Naptowne Rapids. Enforcement should increase in the Middle River and lower river private king fishery, Fines should be set at an amount to deter poaching. It is my very strong belief that many of the problems of overcrowding on the river are due to the use of power boats. If there were more restrictions on where the power boats could be used on the middle and lower rivers I believe that there would be far fewer people on the river and thus solve several of the problems referred to in this survey. I've been fishing the Kenai River for 35 years and I've seen a lot more people on the river in the last 6 to 10 years and yes we have to do some thing that will be fair to all, but the most important thing to remember is to keep our fishery strong for years to come for our children and theirs.. And it's all of our jobs to help in any way that we can, hopefully it's not to late... Keep the upper river guides in the upper river only. Drift boats to only use motors to go down stream. If you don't qualify for an Alaska Permanent Fund, have no Alaska drivers license, your boat is not registered with AK numbers you do not guide on the Kenai or anywhere in the state. Would like a seasonal fee that works at the pillars. Let campground hosts know that they are not Park Rangers and should not act like them or try to be one. Try to separate the dip netters and sport fisherman so we don't have to launch at Sam to get a spot and fish at Gam. Keep up the good work! Limit guides to the 2005 level, make permit (transferability) can be sold with business, this will set the number of guides and the rest will be a buy in for the existing permits. This will set the number of guides and make your permit worth something, we need this. And the system can be set through ADF &G, they already have all the data, enough said. This would have the levels completed to date and for the guide user group problem solved then you can work on the privates use after hours by patrol and before hours start in the morning, showing the private user groups some scene of the burden on the overload of the river no just the guides all the time and make it a mandatory test like we had to go through to permit with parks with the privates. Also, if it's good for one group its good for the other groups Kenai RIVER GUIDE Make it mandatory for Kenai River Guides to be full -time Alaskan residents Make the K. R. a trophy fishery. Give east side set netters the option of a buy out or a drift permit. The Peninsula would boom. Young people would stay around if there was a way to make a living. Most of the questions that were asked in this survey as I have stated before are loaded. There can't be check this box answers. Most of these problems come and go as the Kings /Reds come and go. These discussions are like trying to regulate freeway traffic. It just doesn't make any sense. Granted there were more guides in previous years, but this year those number were way down. Also the general public numbers were way down. Economics and the number of fish returning playing the major roles in determining usage. The Kenai has never been wilderness. There is going to be folks fishing, period. And with that there are going to be clashes. These are people we are dealing with. Again like trying to regulate freeway traffic. Sometimes, there is good driving days/times, sometimes there is congestion. We all just have to deal with it, not make more unenforceable regulations. The regulations that are now in place aren't enforced (except for the guides). Why place more rules ?i!! The rangers need to be much more visible and do their jobs, at all hours, not just until 5pm. This means patrolling the river, not just parking at the ramps as they do here on the lower river. If that is a problem then why even think about more regulations that can't be enforced? My major concerns Ile in the biological, environmental, ecological well being of the drainage. Granted many of the issues touch me close to home because I earn a living on the river but we should not compromise the resources we have in the name of entertainment. It is also important to understand that in the limiting of one user group and not all user groups alienates one user group from the other resulting in strife between the two. My sons are in high school they should have the opportunity to fish guide on the Kenai River we live here in Soldotna it really bothers me that they might lose this opportunity by restrictions. While nonresident guides can come up here for two prime months and leave, locale guides continue to support and care for the community and river! I have seen so many locale guides pick up trash left behind by the hordes coming down from anchorage it really shows who has bought into the caring for the Kenai! No questions were asked about use or facilities on the Kasilof River. An area that needs some major attention. If you're looking for a wilderness experience the Kenai isn't it, If the Kenai is too crowded go somewhere else. No one forces any one to fish the Kenai, In my 35 yrs fishing the Kenai my biggest concern is the success rate has dropped and the size of the fish has gone way down." What good is it if it is just a rough estimate? "Violations on the river are rampant- no lights on boats between sunset and sunrise guides fishing while clients on board- snagging kings and reds from private docks unlicensed guides." Regarding fees: "only if we could keep KPB politics out!!" Outlaw rental boats!! Too dangerous! Overall, the survey was well thought out and pretty well worded. Unlike previous studies, the questions were not real leading in wording. However, 1 was disappointed in the fact that it asked how I limited my guiding followed by in what months; June, July, Aug. or Sept" when in fact we USED to have almost a 6 month season but May is now virtually gone. Apparent by this survey, it is widely accepted that guiding only occurs 4 months a year Please consider a drift only river. Although new issues would surface, it is obvious that many more would be solved. Issues that would benefit from a drift only river: Near zero Bank erosion due to wakes, Zero conflict between motorized and non motorized boaters. Too many guides (fewer people would be willing to row a boat all day) Too many private boats (same) Much less pollution in the Lower River. Zero Lower River turbidity from prop wash, Overall safety would improve if you take speed out of the equation. Better quality of experience for all users without the buzz of engines all day on and on... The choice is obvious. Motor boats will eventually destroy our river in one way or the other. Please feel free to call after 12:OOPM Please help us guides in fixing the Kenai and stop fighting us on issues. Believe it or not we do know what is best as we are out there every day. We see everything that is going on and most good ethical guides will do what is best for the river as we have the most to lose. Please take into consideration the very high number of boats used for dipnetting in late July that are traveling on the Kenai to get to the dipnetting area. Many of the traveling boats are dipnetters and not engaged in sport fishing the Kenai but are counted as such. Page Reductions in guides need to be done for industry stabilization, not for overcrowding. The supply of seats for sale on the river are 3 times more than the demand, there are over 2,000 seats a day for sale but only 400 -600 guided anglers per day on average, and less than 1400 on the busiest days in July, for the season there are 40 -45 thousand guided anglers that fish the river and over 175,000 seats for sale. Registration of guides needs to change because is difficult to manage individual operators. Need to regulate and register guide businesses and issue permits to business owners and their boats. The fees should apply to the owners of the boats, if 1 need to replace. 1 guide: I should not have to pay double to run 1 boat when I need to hire a different guide for that boat. You need to understand how the guide industry works and how who sells trips on the river. Need to gat a handle on who is selling the product of Kenai River fishing trips. Only allow permitted guide businesses to advertise and sell fishing trips, and require a guide client agreement between the guide services performing the trip not the one selling the trip, B &B's tackle stores and lodges can still refer clients to registered guides and collect a commission but the contract and money must go thru a permitted guide, this is done in the guided hunting industry and works well. Also similar to the hunting industry require a new guide to be an assistant guide first for 3 years and work for a permitted guide before that new guide can open a business and advertise and sell trips, also require guide businesses to register in person prior to the season and the number of boats they will permit example feb1 to march 15, they don't have to have their guides registered by that date, but no one can register and permit their business and boats for guiding after that date and registration must be in person. Now is the time to do this as guide numbers are down due to economy. Also parks need to do under cover operations on illegal guides similar to what NOAA just did in the Gulf of Mexico and busted over 20 non permits charter boats in one sting operation, The guide association could get the undercover officers bookings on these boats or the info on how to book it. 6 Regarding "Use limits" "Greater restrictions on guides is not solution. Economic conditions are reducing guides already. The crowding is from private boaters and anglers." Maybe support mandatory registration program... "if it applies to guides or public" Regarding fees, As a guide I already pay enough fees" "More enforcement/patrol" Reservation systems are a good idea but 1 think they should only apply to non guided boaters. Or, just require a 'season permit' for private boaters where they have to receive training, register, pay a user fee, etc. Guides are already heavily regulated and have to get permits, pay huge fees, etc. Unguided users are basically unregulated except for the small fee to launch. User fee increases for non guided users are a good idea also, as guides already pay a substantial amount to operate on the river. it seems like the management strategy in the past has focused primarily on regulation of the guides and not the general public. Let's regulate everyone and take care of this river! In the case of limiting guides, 1 think this is a situation that will kind of regulate itself. With the way the economy is now, there just isn't the demand out there for as many guides as, say, 4 or 5 years ago. So I think you will naturally see a decline in the number of guide permits issued for next year, etc. Require everyone to wear a PFD to be on the river. For how many accidents there were out there this season, this one seems like a no- brainer. Require everyone to take boating safety /river etiquette/boat ramp use /fishing regulations training before being able to put a beat on the Kenai. Guides have to have this kind of training, so the general public should have to also. More restrooms are a must) There is so much garbage, human waste and TP out there on shore it is really disgusting and embarrassing. I pick up at feast one 5 gallon bucket of trash and waste EACH TRIP and so far there is no sign of running out of trash /waste to pick up. Thanks Thanks for working on improving river conditions and quality. Overall, I think less use is better for the ecosystem. Too many users deteriorate and eventually destroy the fish's habitat. The wildness of the Kenai should be protected. That survey took considerably longer then the 20 min I thought and seems very well thought out. It made me think about all of the issues and the gray matter that was provided by the insightful questions... hope it works and it would be fun to follow on a web site or maybe open a blog or forum for the user groups. Don't know... The Kenai river park should be managed for the protection of the resource. Regulations should be made to protect the resource not to exclude the public from said resource. Commercial operators did not make this system the state did and the state as protectors of the public interest/resource managers should take the appropriate steps to protect the resource. The state should have conducted a carrying capacity study before they permitted any commercial operators on the Kenai River the question is why they haven't done this yet. The public in general (guided and unguided) should expect the state to protect all lands and resources for public use. The state created this mess by not being forward looking and only trying to make money on all users. The middle river between Skilak Sings need to be flat bottom boats or raft or drift to help with managing river banks the problem is not the kicker it is the v- bottom. The middle river is my most used stretch of river. I have concerns about human waste for sure, and I think it could regulated, but there needs to be bathroom options. Not everyone can motor to a bathroom and back to the fishing hole and not everyone that can will want to when the fish are biting. 1 don't know the answer but something needs to happen in the future whether it is a self cleaning bio- bathroom or just a better available disposal program. But I do know it is pretty gross having to bring it all back on the boat. Bad for clients. I fish Lees Ferry which is 14 miles of canyon not road accessible and they have bathrooms that break down refuse using some sort of organism. But it is super low maintenance and only needs new tp every once in a while, and maybe a sweep out. This would be a great help to the lower Skilak refuge especially across from bird's corner below the narrows or rainbow alley depending on what you call it, Another problem of mine, mostly this year, was the number of motorized boats in the refuge this year after mid august. I don't know if 11 was because low silver counts that everyone was trout fishing but it felt like the lower river. I felt a huge decline in the quality of fishing and the size of fish being caught. But not even that it is the constant wakes from boats making pass after pass in the same hole. It's like king fishing. It's hard to say though because people are going to fish and if its not one place it will be the other. I guess I'm also disappointed about all the trout guides going to powerboats. It's just not about the experience anymore. The private boat population is growing out of hand. Guide numbers are dropping. A lot of private boats are illegal guides also rental boats. Leave legal guides alone and go after the real problem, not use legal guides The regulation requiring angles to be 10 feet from the bank is creating many problems. My clients have fished for reds in areas for many years and this year they were forced out. This is pushing more anglers into smaller areas creating more crowding. We need to examine why there is this regulation and if 10 feet is really needed. Ten feet out from the bank puts people too deep and beyond where many of the reds are running. The silver salmon limits in September should be reduced back to 2 fish to reduce crowding in the popular holes in the lower and middle river. The study is for restricting guides and I would like to see guides have a vested interest in the fishery. The Halibut fishery in Alaska will be going to a similar limited entry. So based on log books if you guided 25 days or more you have a transferable permit Less than 25 days you can guide but it is not transferable: Keep in mind the guide business, you know most of them, they depend on their own permits to make there business viable. Lodges bring in loads of tax dollars and tourist spending in the area. They even keep guides busy with overflow business, Only residents of Alaska (receive the PFD) are allowed to guide on the Kenai river. The upper river crowding issue for me is more about the conservation of fish habitat and spawning habitat. Also, damage to trout specifically by repeated catch and release and/or poor catch and release methods. More public education is needed concerning gear, fishing techniques, and fish handling techniques. Any measure to reduce bear/human interaction on the Russian River or Kenai River should never involve the removal of fish carcasses from the river system. This is a vital source of food to small salmon, trout, and numerous other animals and is main pathway for the return of nutrients to the ecosystem. People should be encouraged to dispose of carcasses IN THE RIVER. There needs to be a limit of size rafts and drift boats. To many one man vessels are starting to show up in the middle and I have seen a few on the lower in the last couple of years, Any boat under 12' should not be allowed on the river due to safety with power boats and sweepers, and numbers of people on the gravel bars. The upper river has grown in population when the first one man raft carne around. You can see groups of up to 20 one man boats taking over the gravel bars. Now they are showing up in the middle and tower with motors and with out. Anyone can afford a $500 boat that fits in a car and has now river or water experience. Scary. Very pointed questions that seem to lead the survey down a predetermined path. Why the constant push to continue to divide all users groups instead of an attempt to put everyone on the same page? Introduction This section of the supplemental report provides verbatim comments made on the landowner follow -up surveys, organized by topic. Major topic categories include: Crowding and impacts Fishery issues Recreation development or facilities Regulation education Use limits Drift-only or other conflicts Other activities: Have never been on the river, nor have seen my property except by satellite photo Duck Hunting Lower River Middle River below Skilak Only done a guide once, 4 years ago..l am on the river and just go down my stairs to fish on my platform....lower river May trip to do river bank erosion protection, cabled spruce trees along the bank Our clients use guide services Anchor and fish certain holes in middle river Waterfowl (duck /goose /crane) hunting in lower and middle sections It's just nice to spend a few days at our cabin away from the hustle bustle Middle and lower river duck hunting with and without a power boat. Picnics on Skilak lake, kayaking on lake Bird watching We qualify for subsistence dip netting at the Russian River Falls, so we do that. Camping at cabin Other problems on property Huge problems with trash using my land as a restroom, tearing my bank down Have no idea how much tresspassing occurs Snow machine access to the lake Sightseers or locals walking along the beach above mean high water Not sure if you can call it trespassing but boats (mostly guides) running to close to shore Fishing on my property during silver fishing, killing natural grasses Dog walkers sight seers Guided boats coming to close to the banks destroying the banks and vegetation. Guide boats dropping their clients off on our property to "take a leak" Break in my cabin. 5 times in past 10 years Beach walkers. Suggestions for addressing trespassing problems Don't know. Provide public river access points. Close Bings landing Lower park, shut off road from subdivision Rapids Ave. Steelhead that leads to free parking and free access to Naptowne Rapids, the best red hole.... No parking structure for bank fishermen the parking lots are full with guide boats. Posting signs. Perform regular patrols by Fish and Game officials /State Troopers from cooperating residential locations. This was very successful this past summer. Private property owners should not be responsible for trespassers damaging their banks. My property has a "walking" easement on it. This is wrong. If the state /parks whatever want people to be able to access river front they should be responsible for bank restoration. To respect No Trespassing" signs where posted None; rare occurence(s) resolved by direct confrontation and resolution. Take more public notice; mention in behavior flyers, etc. I can't come up with any other reason other than the land owner post sign and report any trespassing incidents to the Parks or Troupers, It is something that would be hard to control during the summer fishing season to monitor any other way that I can think of. Don't know....signs don't work more fish and game people on the river, but the cost is too great. I believe they are doing a good job for the most part, Enforcing the regulations we already have in place Property owners must post a no trespassing sign. Trespassers are then warned by an enforcement officer. If trespassing persists, the trespasser is then issued a trespass after warning citation. With the limited number of Staff in the Parks dept, there isn't much more to do. More public restrooms along the river, especially in the lower river where the majority of the guide boats operate. Our trespass has mostly been from guides dropping off clients for a "rest break Not a big issue with me. More signs for the home owner to install on his land and allow owners to put up fences on property, Install fences, log piles or rocks to make it harder to cross over and issue stiff fines. Property owners could take pictures of this trespassers and or follow them to the vehicles and get their license plates and call the state troopers and/or the Park Rangers and issue a citation. Signs and Fines Not a problem Better signage at the access point (boat ramp) and along the river bank. Restricting bank fishing from other than board walks especially the commercial properties that bring in paying clients to the river property. Better enforcement and citations instead of warnings. If boaters or guides trespass, we should e able to provide a picture and boat or guide number for your use. After 3 offenses /year, the use of a boat on the river is revoked for 1 year. More public launches and access. Provide "official looking" No Trespassing signs for owners which have a State Parks "signature." Provide more public access on state land. Bank restoration is good but you need to allow access to multiple areas to accomodate the crowds Much of our problem is guides dropping of clients. It's difficult for us to police so I'm not sure what the state can do. More public fishing areas with road access during red and silver seasons. Education of the public and guide fleet. Fine the guide if guided. Fine the private person Heavy fines larger parking at bing browns camping Trespassers usually live nearby. When I tell them thaty can't fish from my porperty, they simply get in the water in front of my property and and mess up my fishing. GIVE LANDOWNERS THE RIGHT TO CONTROL RED FISHING IN FRONT OF THEIR PROPERTY. TRESPASSERS CAN CAUSE AS MANY PROBLEMS BY FISHING IN THE RIVER IN FRONT OF A PROPERTY AS THEY CAN BY FISHING FROM OUR PROPERTY. I think trespassing is not necessarily a State Parks issue, rather something that should be addressed by city or State law agencies just like trespassing would be addressed on any other parcel of property. We do not have any problems of trespassing on our property. River Watch is a wonderful program Install more public facility, river access and limit the number of guides on river. Seems to be a property owner problem in popular fishing area. More law enforcement presence might discourage some people from frequenting the river. Officers can meet/get to know property owners. Be aware of where private property is located and when checking fishing licenses check for legal access and ensure fisherman are aware of trespassing laws. no problem for me, due mainly to the fact we are on a shallow branch of the river and out of the way of most desirable areas Provide and make known more areas along the length of the river that are open to angler bank fishing. Provide more and more easily accessible, well stocked and regularly cleaned and serviced, bathroom facilities along the length of the river. By far the greatest offenders are the guide boats that let their clients off to take a leak or worse require them to have a screened in portapotty or schedule stops at campgrounds. 01 Enforce and expand no parking zones. Pass rules with stiff monetary fines, State Parks has enough to do without trying to enforce trespassing on private property. There are existing laws that relate to trespassing along the Kenai River as well as any other property. Working with AK troopers and/or police from the cities of Kenai or Soldotna as appropriate should address this problem. If the troopers have a history of not responding to tresspass problems, then perhaps State Parks could work out some sort of protocols with the troopers and /or city police to try to do a better job of enforcing trespass laws along the Kenai. Maybe larger fines. Better and more visible education It is not a problem on our Kenai Lake front property. Not a problem. Increase fines and have enforcement hot line to call. Lists of other management issues Trash, restrooms, facilities to take on these users Number of guides using middle river Proper treatment of catch and release fish Too many guides on the river, especially lower river. We have bank erosion from guides who cut close to our property on the bend of the river. They are so close to the back we can't see them from our house. Number of seals now frequenting river up to college hole especially during silver salmon season (aug -sep) Behavior of powerboat guides towards non- guided boat fisherman The number of guide boats on the river -local people do not fish the river due to all the guide boats. Building on the lower Kenai river is out of hand, it looks terrible (condos) Allow landing nets (only) to be placed on the river bank during the red season! We should let people fish from boats in July for red salmon in front of the Kenai keys Boat lauches Continual closure of mid river bank fishing areas Need rest room facilities in the middle river section Limit the guides on the river With the larger boats and 50hp mtrs, the speed that is attained can be very dnagerous. We need cops! Diminishing shotgun hunting access areas on the lower and middle river sections. Must be restored. Law enforcement of existing laws such as lights and anchoring on drift boat mondays Too many guides on the middle river. Number of guide boats on river -all times and fisheries Under powered boats(or over loaded) throwing a large wake that destroys the bank Excessive openings for commercial fishing Conflicts caused by allowing drift fishing, backtroling and back bouncing in the same area. Commercial fishing periods and over fishing by commercial interests The boats that move so rapidly around other boaters that our fishing To many guides on river. Yes when the river is over the banks it should be closed to boat traffic Excessive numbers of guided anglers, and the heavy pressure on the fishery by guided anglers Guide boats running at high speed very close to the river banks Too many guides on lower river. l will not fish there any more, only play/fish middle river now Too many guides Excess number of guides on middle and lower river Unregulated development of commercial recreation facilities along the Kenai, and unregulated numbers of guides. Way, way too many guides being allowed on the river at any given time, some are just down right rude Aircraft leaving river from moose river area, mid river, should there be a concern about h.p. and riverbank erosion. Available restrooms Why has there been no follow up studies to support the switch to 50 hp engines? I suspect the answer is because the expected results were not obtained. This is the worst decision to impact the river in 25 years. Only doen to appease the guies with boats too big adn of wrong hull design for a 35 hp engine. Lack of rest room facilities and garbage collection on south bank of russian river ferry. Too many powerboats on middle river destroying river bank! No law enforcement help for people living next to one of these parks along he river no help from parks past thier line even with the state s, fed, etc. Asset being the problems Guides following fishing regulations with clients Excessive speed of boats on mid and lower river Guides swapping anchors in productive holes; and "reserving" anchorages while leaving such anchorages for more business/ potty and coffee breaks. Lack of enforcement on guides I question the accuracy of the hydrocarbon sampling in the river. To many guides on the river, resident aiaska guides given priorty. Stop selling out to big money and political power 50 hp motors in the new guide boats create more wake than ever before with 40 hp motors. Drift boat take -outs Wake erosion is terrible this year. Too big boats with too many occupants. Guide boats navigating up the middle river at 4;30am. Guides should be required to fish middle river some of the time to reduce pressure on lower river Guide density in the lower river in July To many guides on the river...a limit should be established Guides plugging off public boat launches. Last year due ti poor management during high water a lot of damage was done to banks Seems guides measure success by quantity of fish and seldom by recreational values Lack of rules against issue 2 Number of guide license's needs to be reduced greatly to preserve river. Boat wakes causing bank erosion Water quality issues i.e. Lack of enforcement of dec regulations on human waste; soldotna effluent, etc. More regulation on the limitation of guides on the river Boat launches Whoever allowed the riverquest subdivison to be built should be fired and run out of state. It is the most obnoxious development on the river, Homer eiectric and ciri plans for hydro power dams at the Kenai headwater lakes that threaten the fish runs of the entire river. Too many powerboats on middle river destroying river bank! Names of "other" river(s) they use Kasilof (4) Quartz Creek, Crescent Creek, Ptarmigan Creek Crowd in on the guides push them like they push Other (please specify and identify segment) I have never visited my property, therefore cannot answer this section Fish game are too busy taking Kick -backs from the organized "commercial" fleets and they choke off the Red season (fro the pasts years) to the point that no fish get thru during the peak! The escapment numbers have dwindled to prove that! NO Reds. The private fisherman puts far more into the economy, verses a few F &G. Operators lack of skill to safely operate boat and lack of awareness of bank errosion and vegetation impact. We go dip netting at the Russian River Falls to stock up for winter, then concentrate on recreational fishing along the Upper River. Suggestions of other "entire river" management actions Reduce number of guides using middle river, either in total or to a max each day Fewer guides More patrols by officials to guard against illegal catching methods...such as snagging and enforcing limit regulations. Eliminate guides using and blocking pillars launch and ramp I think there needs to be some limit on guides permits. No boat fishing below cunningham park for kings, reds, silvers; dipping okay. Speed restrictions Demand that guides do not make fishing policy, do not unilaterally decide that a traditional anchored silver fishing area is suddenly for fishing by drifting or back trolling only. I believe that the number of guides have to be controlled -they are running a business not recreation. Limit the number of out of state guides To reduce crowding in lower river, open closed areas in middle river during the 2nd run. Reduce guide population Put a speed limit on boats no over loading of boats (people) will help prevent wakes and erosion Reduce the number of guides on the river Limit the guides On river allow odd numbered boats on river sun,w,f; even numbered boats tu, th s If banks are being trampled too much, don't close them put in board walks, closing will just redirect them to a new area to trample. The 50hp motor size is now allowing jet units to be used inefficiently and making large wakes and lots of noise now contrary to the desired effect. Real nicel!ll You never thought of that, did you Limit the number of guides by segment Limit the number of guide boats on the river at one time. Enforce guide regulations entire season not just July Designate different areas of river for different types of fishing, drift, backtrol, etc Reduce the guides on the river.... Protect the river and better fish counting system Clarify and strictly enforce catch limits, illegal snagging, littering, behavior disturbing to others Limit days of guides in June July Reduce the number of people on the river during peak periods; limited entry permits for guides like occurs for bristol bay. Reduce guides Decrease the number of guides Audit entire river for human waste system violations and enforce improvements Limit the number of guides, especially the rude and abusive ones Guides don't own the river, expecially ones who only live in ak during fishing season, heavy fines for abuse to other boats /fisherman. Go back to 35 hp restriction Get directly involved with the stopping of homer electric and ciri's plans for hydroelectric dams and the industrialization of the upper river head waters. Lower powerboat horsepower Enforce max 5 people in boat including all humans and dogs!! Limit the number of guide boats On river, allow guides odd numbers su, w, f; even numbered guides tu, th, s More non -guide fishing days Limit the number of non guide boats on the river. Landowners a long the river front should have top priority Prohibit public red fishing within 25' of private property where posted by landowner. Limit the numbers of guides Close river when water is at river bank If the desire is for a healthier Kenai river, there need to be more drift -only days, leading eventually to drift-only river and we only own a power boat! Limit the number of commercial guides allowed to operate on the Kenai More "slot" fishing to protect the large kings t r m Perhaps fine anglers and other river users for littering by making it a ticketable offence, like fishing without a license. Prohibit powerboat use on middle river during all of July. Water is usually high. Use limit and guide issues The people own the river not the government Don't know how to answer...questions are beginning to bother me. I know we have to do something,..but this is beginning to sound like micro management, No, because I believe it would favor the guiding industry (using history) The commercial over fishing has already done permanent irreversable fish counts, people will continune to quit coming. Yes, but only to gather use data by segment, guided, nonguided for future use. Use registration to restrict use of lower and middle river. Even numbers could fish lower river on even days and middle river on odd days and vice versa Limit the number of guides on the river The need is not for more administrative action; the need is for people to stand up and take responsibility for lessening the impact of power boats on the river before it is used to death. Drift Only Issues Fix the problems you have now trash bathrooms, parking and the others will be easy Drift only is overly restrictive, i.e. prohibits me from fishing from my boat that is moored to my property all summer, though I do not even start the motor. More than that, it does not benefit the river and its resources as much as would reducing the number of guide boats on the water. It is getting like a Bristol Bay opening out there. Time for limited entry. We do not have drift only days now!! Drift only would mean Just that NO power boats, You also mention No guides above, Are you kidding me, Does anyone even go out on drift only days from this survey, Guides and other power boat users are all over the river, it seems they are allowed to run clients up and down the river to Bank fish, "DRIFT BOAT ONLY Should mean just that, Give the fish and the river bank a rest. The 50 HP is also a joke for helping the river bank. 3' to 4` seas on the lower river in July from the boat traffic. i strongly believe These things need to change, Mondays only are a good thing. The fish get a day off. Adding more drift only days will add even more traffic to the power boat days. There are not enough launches and removal points to allow adding more drift only days Drift boats have Monday to THEMSELVES on the lower river to fish, and they CAN fish any other day of the week. I do NOT support SPECIAL RIGHTS for special interest groups. I believe that my family and I have JUST as much right to use the river in my power boat as someone that wants to drift it. Fishing IS fishing... It is NOT MY fault that they can't come back up stream and make a second pass through a good hole. And for those that want that "natural quiet' feeling there is aiways the upper river. Absolutely no guides on drift only Mondays. The drift only days should be for private boaters. I'm sorry, but after fishing the river for the past 37 years, I do not believe the river system owes anyone a living, which seems to be the opinion of the guide industry. "Drift only regulations must include all regulations related to river use. Eg: anchoring in channel. Rationale is non fishing power boats need access to channel, My property is at Falling In Hole. There were days I couldn't get my boat away from my dock because of the number of anchored drift boats. Seems that this is another guide issue, the conflict is related to the excessive number of guided anglers on the river, government has not the will to reduce number of guide licenses so I don't feel any sympathy for the resulting conflicts. On some days 75% of all the boats are guides. Hardly anyone in government has a concern for private anglers such as myself and my neighbors. Drift-only days are the only way to reduce the impact of boats on the Kenai River. Increasing the horsepower limit to 50 has done nothing to reduce the impact of wakes on the riverbank. Absolutely no changes should be made to the current "drift only" regulations. Many folks, especially seniors, cannot take the rigors of rowing a drift boat. The addition of new drift-only days should be restricted to public anglers, i.e. not open to guides. This would help balance the use of the resource that has resulted in disparate harvest levels and use impacts between the use of non guided and guided anglers. Restrict the number of guides In July, the water is high and river bank is susceptible to bank erosion from the powerboat wakes. The middle river should be drift only in June and July. My yes is conditional, since I have no idea how you would enforce this registration This isn't a golf course you shouldn't have to pay to play on the Kenai. Perhaps just a yearly Kenai River boat use permit, like a fishing license, available on the internet? Guide unguided use issues I feel the number of powerboat guides on the water, especially those with heavily loaded semi -vee hulls (heavy wakes) is an issue for the river itself, as well as for other guided and unguided boaters. Densities in the high season make navigating through the fleet often tricky, and occasionally dangerous. The excessive guides certainly have an economic effect on the Kenai Peninsula. However, the large number of guides also taking too many fish from the river. Guides are beginning (based on 30 years of observation) to demand that people fishing in traditional anchor areas must suddenly become back toilers or drifters. I am thinking specifically about the gravel bar on the downstream left area across the Big Eddy pit stop near Bob Penneys boat cabin at mile 17. Guides should NOT unilaterally make such decisions; fish and game enforcement officials should show some backbone and stop such actions when they are reported. DON'T be afraid of the guides most of whom are from out of state!! From what I have observed, it is the people who come up for a few weeks each summer....they make assumptions on what they can do or not do. These are the type of people who will not read any pamphlet or check the Internet. Guides and people who live here the entire summer care and try to do the right thing. 1 have stated before the Total number of guides need to be limited. In State guides get first priority, We need the money to stay in state. m The Guides are not the problem any more, you have them taking classes and adequate rules, they seem to be behaving now. But now you have no fish in the river during the peak Red season, You're not communicating this to F &G! What's the point of managing the River with severely dwindled fish counts! Limit guides to an 8 hr period. 8AM 4 PM and one set of clients per day. This would reduce the wear on the guides and provide the customers a better experience both in catching fish and enjoying the watershed. Limit the guides Were talking about a two week period that causes most of the conflict, The other times of the year guided/unguided issues are minimal. I say the Kenai is what it is and its habitat that is the main issue not guides vs. non guides. I have been fishing this river since 1972 and this summer it seems that most of the guides were just plain rude. While I have NO real problems with guides per se. I do think that the number of boat that can operate on one guide license needs to be restricted. Also the time limits (no guides on the river after 6:OOpm) needs to be enforced. I normally try to limit my fishing to after 6:OOpm so as to not deal with the guides, but this last year especially there seemed to be more than a few boats out that had six people out (five fishing and one driver) both with guide stickers and without. After fishing this river from the late seventy's up until now it is quite easy to spot a guided boat,.. all the fisherpeople being coached by the driver and the driver is the one doing all the work, baiting hooks, pouring coffee, etc. Plus some of the drivers are people that 1 have seen out on the river in a marked guide boat earlier in the day. The high number of guides is the problem if you want to see, just take a ride on the river in July instead of setting in the office The rivers eco system is a finite resource. It's way over due that this issue be addressed and control the use placed on the system. How do you decide what group is causing the impact issues? I would rather use the river with a high number of guides than a small number of unskilled unguided users. The vast majority of guides are very professional and courteous. See my previous page on this issue. However I will say that my personal impacts with guides have been much better in the past few years perhaps due to increased professionalism and the guide school, I have lived on and fished the middle Kenai for 38 years The guides need to be ticketed for traveling wide open with a fully loaded boat 10 feet off the bank. s Spa '3 Development issues on the Kenai I appreciate the River Center concept which provides a single stop permitting location for development. l have found the process to be well organized and generally well run. I do believe the standard development allowances (1/3 of riverfront, dock size limit) need to be used as guidelines, not absolute limits. Property characteristics should be considered in every case. Bank stabilization techniques need better development. EXISTING regulations need to be enforced! Existing regulations are being circumvented by the use of boards or other walkway material that render the existing one -third limit meaningless. There are properties in the middle river area that are one continuous walkway from property to property. I do not know if these individuals have received a variance from the existing regs. Perhaps they have and I just do not know it. Common sense and courtesy go a long ways; not always displayed in Kenai River Management. You have the regulations but don't enforce it the length of the river The Kenai River center is good. People there very helpful about the rules, and suggesting ways to help restore bank on private property. Rules are needed and these folks serve as helpers, and co- ordinate the multiple agencies involved in River and bank control /use Look at the condos going up on the lower River, Makes the Homor Spit condos look good. Who monitiors this? Making spruce tree stabilization should not require the permitting process. It should be encouraged with no restriction. Instead, land owners are given tickets for stabilizing their banks... How can you incorrectly install a spruce tree abutment Besides, the more spruce trees that are added, the less the waves from boats etc. will erode your bank. What zoning? The biggest problem is the 1 don't give a damn how they do it on the outside, we will do it our way attitude. The KPB permits 'Recreational Development" that turns into Year Around access in order to TAX. With the KPB, taxes come first, watershed quality comes last. Check the KPB's attendance at the KRSMA Board meeting for the past year that tells you how they feel about the quality of LIFE. Their motto is "BUILD TO TAXI Need to enforce bank development rules. Developing along the river front must be controllered. There's no enforcement. I recommend checking that all dock owners have permits and limiting dock size. Specifically, some of the docks on Beaver Creek have grown to an unreasonable size. Preserving the waterfront by re- vetment is VERY important. Expensive but important to the health of the river and fish Complying with some of the regulations is very expensive. if governmental agencies care about mitigating damage to the Kenai, they should make it as easy as possible for landowners to obtain permits for boardwalks and erosion control structures. KPB zoning protections for the Kenai streambanks are extremely weak and ineffective. The Corps of Engineers does little to protect wetlands, DEC does little to enforce violations, even commercial violations, of existing water quality regulations. And ADF &G's habitat division does not have sufficient staff to monitor development along the Kenai. We also need to enforce the restrictions that are in place for development now! River Quest what zoning? It seems rather overwhelmingly that the HENCIRI plans for the Hydroelectric dams on the Upper Kenai River headwater lakes is the greatest threat to the health of the entire river and all the communities along the river. The experience of the Cooper Lake dam project should not be repeated. If the salmon runs are adversely affected then many of the overcrowding issues will vanish along with the river economy. I think State Parks along with every other state regulatory commision should get actively involved in blocking this unwise development. Dont agree that only 113 of frontage can have a fish boardwalk. If a landowner wants to put in an approved boardwalk that will save the bank from erosion caused from fisherpersons walking on it to fish they should be alllowed to do it, even if it covers most of the frontage. Suetgested Lower River Actions Limit use by reg would only serve people /guides wealthy enough to have two boats. Limit the number of guides limit the guides Only one guided trip per day No wake zones are listed at least in beaver creek that just need to be enforced The strongest best will survive, the weaker will lose money and go out of business, leave as is. Limit the number of guides year round Limit the number of boats a guide can fish one boat per each guide service. ciii I don't feel fair to suggest as I only use the lower river a few times each season. In fact this year I did not use it once. Suggested Middle River Actions I see nothing in here about fixing Bings Landing, Naptowne Rapid erosion problem, bank issues, trash, and restrooms. I don't feel over crowded on the middle river where I boat and fish. Open the closed area below funny river in July after the Kings have gone up the funny. you put more boat traffic on the river by not allowing fishing from boats in the Kenai Keys Limit speed limit and number of people in the boat Stop closing off the fishing areas Sorry could not type in dollar amount for "User fee" on previous page. I think a seasonal fee of $25 for users is not unreasonable. Control the number of houses being built per year along the river. Work with the refuge to limit the number of guides allowed to operate on the refuge below Skilak Lake. I only fish from the front of my property, not from a boat. No powerboats Limit the number of public accesses to the river including boat ramps. Boats have not been a problem at my home. Suggested Upper River Actions Manage /restrict the number of fishermen during the red runs Garbage removal, disposable bins, and rest rooms on the south side of the Russian River Ferry high use area banks. Introduction Topics include: This section of the supplemental report provides edited excerpts from a report by Melissa Arndt, the Upper River survey technician. It summarizes verbal comments from the public during surveying, or other observations about issues on the river. All opinions expressed are the author's and are provided to State Parks as supplemental information to the study. Congestion at Jim's Landing Congestion and other impacts at Sportsman's Ferry Russian River Confluence Congestion at "Guard Rail" General crowding on the Upper River Camping issues on the Upper River Improper release of fish Law enforcement Other safety issues Fish carcass and bear attraction issues Reactions to the study Congestion and other issues at Jim's Landing Jim's Landing boat launch is one of the busiest places on the Upper Kenai River, and crowding and congestion are common. Major issues include ramp congestion, traffic organization, and lack of parking. Ramp congestion, When boats are lining the launch area waiting to take out, and more boats are coming in trying to land, it can be congested and may even create a safety hazard. Almost daily, I would see boaters trying to put boats into the launch, not having ample enough room to do it and become panicked. Some would jump out of boats trying to stop in water that was too deep and get pulled down stream. As the last take -out before the canyon, with strong currents downstream, it is obviously not a good place to be out of one's boat. Others at the ramp sometimes help bring boats to shore, but this can be perilous too trying to stop a raft or drift boat full of people at a swift water landing is often harder than it looks, When I was a scenic trip guide on the river (in previous years), landing at Jim's when it is busy could be an adventure. I had to be on point and use good rowing techniques and skills to land safely, because the eddy can be small and occupied. Sometimes I could not land safely without the aid from folks on shore. Many times this summer I witnessed boaters who were forced to land downstream from the main eddy, which can be unsafe. There were a few incidents where i had to put aside my survey duties to help folks keep from missing the landing. Traffic congestion. One recurring problem is that some boaters will de -rig their boats in the middle of the landing area, taking up the space needed to safely back vehicles down and load boats on trailers. A second problem is related to unorganized patterns of using the ramp. Once boats are loaded on trailers, people tend to pull out in multiple directions, adding to the chaos. At busy times, everyone in the area has to be alert to keep themselves and their equipment out of the way of boats, vehicles, and trailers. Frustration at waiting sometimes leads more aggressive users to fit their trailer in a tight "slot,' which makes it harder for others using the ramp to get their boats safely out of the water. Parking shortages, The number of parking spaces for vehicles and trailers is small relative to use levels on busy days. The parking areas at Jim's Landing fill up early on most days and the overflow parking area across the Sterling Highway can fill on very busy days. When that fills, users parallel park along Skilak Lake Road, congesting the road too. Potential solutions. There are several potential ways to address these congestion problems at Jim's Landing, The following list comes from many discussions with users, including guides and unguided users. Some are short -term (could occur sooner), while others might require longer time horizons (and major facility development, that would take planning and environmental compliance efforts). "One-way" signs directing traffic to the left of the "traffic island" in the middle of the launch area. This gives more room and a better angle to back down to the active part of the ramp. As the vehicle then leaves with a boat on the trailer, they can go in a clockwise pattern around the island to get out. Although it is counter intuitive to go to the left of a mid -road island, the pose slope of the ramp and amount of space available makes this system work best. When people go to or wait on the right (north) side the island, they block the easiest exit for people coming up from the ramp. Time Limit" signs for de- rigging boats in this one -way system. People should not occupy these prime trailer accessible parts of the ramp for more than 5 or 10 minutes at busy times, or the line becomes very long. "Vehicle staging area" signs directing waiting vehicles trailers out of the main loading f unloading area. There may be room for these vehicles at the far end of the road (past the boardwalk), but some vehicles arrive and wait in the area for up to 30 minutes for boats (especially commercial guides), It is important to keep these waiting vehicles out of the one way' launch access system described above until they are ready to get in the queue and actually retrieve their boats. Active loading and unloading" signs in main launch area (upstream from the clump of trees and shrubs dividing the upstream "ramp" from the downstream "beach" in front of the boardwalk). The main ramp should only be for boats and trailers "ready to go" or boats just coming off the river and want to use the eddy. "Inactive or boat waiting area" signs directing users to keep their boats downstream from the "active" ramp until their trailer is ready to pick -up the boat. It is not uncommon for 5 or more boats to be parked in the active ramp while users retrieve their vehicles or wait for a shuttle. If their vehicle is across the highway (which is often the case), it can take 15 minutes or more before the trailer arrives at the ramp. This problem is exacerbated by users who de -rig rafts or spread camping gear along this main ramp. In addition to clogging the area used for active boat retrieval, boats coming off the river into this eddy may need to use this eddy. The ramp works best when people have a spot in the ramp to get their boats in, unload passengers, then move their boat downstream to the beach below the trees until their trailer arrives, then bring it back up to the active ramp again. Most guides and frequent users on the upper river are beginning to make this the "regular pattern" but new users don't always understand it (and verbal instructions from guides or other longtime users are not always appreciated). Posting signs would help. "10 minute de- rigging area" signs to keep these activities away from the active loadinglunloading area could help congestion. After people have pulled their boats and trailers from the water, there is still some work to do securing them and getting the trailer ready for the highway. While some users can get this done quickly, others take a long time and clog the ramp during this period. Creating a place to rig and clearly signing these areas would help. Many do this activity directly upstream of the ramp or in front of the restrooms, but there is not always room for passing traffic. Some are using the area just across Skilak Lake Road at the entrance to Jim's Landing (it is not unusual on a busy afternoon to see 4 or 5 vehicles with trailers there). Additional signage at the ramp encouraging this (and making the area larger) could be helpful. Prevent long -term parking in the area at the end of the road (downstream of the active loading area). This area is currently filled with bank anglers, sometimes with larger RVs that appear to be camping (even as this is not allowed). More room here for staging and waiting vehicles would ease congestion in the active loading zone. One way road with a new exit to Skilak Lake Road. This is a longer -term solution and would reorganize the traffic pattern. The main idea is have a new gravel road loop out of the downstream active loading area to Skilak Road. The existing road would be signed as the "entrance," and the new gravel road would be the "exit." This idea would then include small put- outs on either side of new exit road providing area for de- rigging with "Limit 10 minute parking" signs. Remove metal boardwalk and parking along the "lower beach" to provide more vehicle access to active loading areas (although the slope of the beach would probably prevent effective trailer access), This will create less room for vehicles waiting to use the upstream active ramp or for parking, and it probably requires the one way road and exit (described above) to allow vehicles sufficient room to exit the area. Many uses would like to camp near Jim's Landing (and some appear to camp in RVs at the Landing on some nights). If such camping were allowed in an expanded development, those sites should be located in areas separate from boat ramp users to avoid congestion, Crowding, congestion, and other issues at the Sportsman's I Ferry Confluence area This area can be very crowded with bank anglers during the red salmon runs. In 2009, the first run was particularly high use. Most concerns focused on: Lack of fish cleaning tables (see carcass management issue below) Long lines at cleaning tables Garbage and litter. Lack of parking. Lack of camping. Verbal arguments over non handicapped users fishing in the handicapped area Needing to hike long distances to avoid crowds Dangerous driving and parking Peak crowding during the first red run. The first week of the first red run was very crowded. Waits of 45 minutes or longer were common to get entrance into the ferry parking lot and overwhelmed the area. Lines would flow out into Sterling Highway, causing very dangerous driving. This led to some visible honking, yelling, and similar "road rage" incidents. Illegal parking along the highway was more common than i had ever observed in the past (two prior seasons). Garbage and litter levels were higher than I had observed in the past. A vehicle was abandoned near the east entrance of the ferry on the highway, remained there for weeks, but eventually vandalized, stripped, and set on fire. Surveying at the ferry during the first sockeye run was chaotic and stressful. You had to pay close attention to the large numbers of people who were casting (and not always getting their flies into the river) when walking the banks to conduct the survey. A better option was to approach people when they were taking a break for fishing, having lunch, cleaning fish or waiting at the fillet tables, or leaving in the parking lot. Illegal snagging or other fishing violations. Unfortunately, I saw many people violating regulations during my time surveying. Illegal snagging and taking of red salmon was the most common violation. ON about 10 occasions I saw stringers with kept rainbows and/or dollies over 16 inches (not allowed). When I saw these violations, I reported them to the Refuge enforcement officer. Combat fishing etiquette. I was often disheartened by public behavior, especially during the first red run. Anglers would occasionally fight over holes, disregard fishing regulations, be generally discourteous to each other, and leave lots of trash behind (especially toilet paper in the woods, and fishing line on the banks). Potential solutions. Most suggestions for this area focused on education, regulations, and increased law enforcement, but some also wanted facility improvements. Major education themes included: Pack in /pack out and related leave no trace" education Combat fishing etiquette Sear awareness education (particularly focused on keeping packs nearby and disposing of carcasses appropriately). Major other suggestions included, More garbage cans and litter patrol Additional designated handicapped fishing or parking areas, More law enforcement Congestion in Guard Rail area The area along the highway next to 'Guardrail" pull -out has become a popular spot for fishing and wildlife viewing. In 2009, there were several bears seen in the area throughout both red runs. On this small section of highway, the river and far riverbank are in full view. The public's excitement for wildlife makes it nearly impossible for them not to stow down and pull over to see and photograph such bears, or the whole combat fishing scene. There is a small pull out west of the guard rail, but it is typically full during the red seasons. Even those who get a good place to park have to walk on the road for the view, and many cross and re- cross the highway in this area. Meanwhile, vehicles traveling on the Sterling may be travelling 45 to 55 mph. This is an extremely dangerous area for pedestrian traffic interactions. Potential solutions focus on enlarging the pull -out, better signage or Confi r Crowding in general on the Upper River Camping issues on Upper River Improper release of fish River a flashing caution light, pedestrian cross walk striping, creation of a separated walkway, and better traffic enforcement (the most common response). Anglers would often discuss how they respond to crowding or make other observations about how crowding Many noted that they try to avoid weekends and holidays, or the peak of the salmon runs. A few mentioned coming, or will go to other segments. Many noted that it is not only red runs that are crowded anymore, and fishing is becoming similarly crowded. In many cases, users note that these problems can create an overall enjoyable experience, Common impacts mentioned include: a Trampled river banks Excessive litter Too many boats to safely put over to fish or camp Difficulty finding a place to park at launches Illegal parking on roads or near launches Over -used restrooms a Piles of trash Full or "over full" campgrounds (people move into undesignated areas) Highway safety problems Wildlife gets disrupted, displaced, and possibly killed (defense of life and property kills) Boat launches become clogged with vehicles and boats affects their trips. that they might stop late summer trout stressful or not Potential solutions focused on setting capacities (limiting boats or parking per area), more education (litter and etiquette), and more facilities to handle use (restrooms and campgrounds). During peak season (summer months), some groups will camp on the Upper River for many consecutive nights. At the mouth of the Upper Kenai (inlet to Skilak Lake) there is an island where groups of campers have reportedly stayed for weeks at a time (one group may have stayed for over a month), Some people complain about such groups, noting that they "control" those areas and prevent access for others for picnicking, fishing, camping, or preparing for the trip across the lake. There are also complaints about drug and alcohol use in these camps, as well as excessive trash, wrecked camp chairs, and other refuse after they left. The most often discussed solutions focus on a regulation (and enforcement) of a camping limit (with 3 to 7 days being the most -often discussed). Heavy camping and fishing use has created human waste toilet paper litter problems in many areas, especially the well -known better campsites. Most popular camps and fishing areas accessible by boat have used toilet paper in the alders. Often times it is not visible from riverside; however if you walk 30ft into the woods it is very evident, and users complain about it. Most discussed solutions are focused on increased education about how to properly bury waste or how to use carry-out systems (e.g., wag bags). Others discuss the need for more trash receptacles (especially at Jim's Landing, where there is no trash service and people sometimes just leave trash anyway. The Rainbow Trout and Dolly Varden fishing on the Kenai River is world renown and receives considerable pressure. Most anglers release rainbows and dollies, but many anglers complain about how others catch and release these fish. Many worry that too many anglers use barbed hooks and point to evidence of scaring or torn mandibles on fish that are caught. I've witnessed many anglers keeping fish out of water for long periods of time trying to unhook a fish; sometimes allowing fish to flop around in their boat or on a gravel bar before getting it out. This has also become a very hot topic amongst guides and locals on the Upper River, who relate "horror stories" about mishandled fish. On one occasion, I witnessed a trophy rainbow left on a boat platform for four minutes before the hook was removed and the fish returned to the river. Most solutions suggested focus on changed fishing regulations such as "barbless hooks only" after red salmon runs, greater enforcement of existing regulations, and more education on proper ways to release fish (note: fishing regulations were out of the scope of the study). Law enforcement Law enforcement has their hands full on the Kenai River and in surrounding areas, and public discussion of law enforcement was a common theme. There are multiple law enforcement authorities in the area (officers from Forest Service, Refuge, State Parks and state troopers may be present) and it can be challenging to determine who is working in different areas or at different times. In general, the public is unaware of distinctions between different agencies and responsibilities. Some people mention that they would prefer more patrols, mentioning the various fishing, camping, litter, and parking /traffic issues described above. The overwhelming impression from people who discuss law enforcement is "we need more of them." Similarly, many discussions of education or regulation solutions end with 'but how are they going to enforce that or Who enforces that? They do not have enough money to enforce that!" One day while surveying the Russian River campground, I saw a large amount of smoke across the river by Resurrection Pass trail. E reported it and within 10 minutes of my call there were fire trucks at that trail head. A brush fire had started and was getting out of control. Other river safety issues Several users mentioned safety concerns on the river. Common issues include: users not wearing PFDs, inadequate or faulty gear /boats (e.g., single- person "fish cats hazardous loading /unloading of boats (especially at Jim's Landing), and inexperienced operators. Potential solutions usually focused on improved education, including a potential required boater education course (especially if offered online). Bears and Russian River carcass issues Reactions to the study In 2009, the preferred option for red salmon cleaning was to have anglers take whole fish out of the fishing areas to prevent carcass build -up in eddies in the Russian River or the Kenai. The fish cleaning stations /tables were removed from the Russian River, and only a few were available at the confluence and the ferry. Many people did not use cleaning tables, and followed the instructions to take their fish out whole, although many others continued to clean fish at the point of harvest as in previous years. Carcass build -ups were much higher during the first run of reds, when use levels and catch rates were generally higher. The second run had some days of high catch rates, but genrally featured lower use over a longer period and fewer carcass problems. If people take out the entire fish, there is some question about where those fish are eventually cleaned. Some people reported fish carcasses were often dumped in trash bins at local businesses in Cooper Landing. When business owners called Troopers to report the problem, they were instructed to take scraps to the local dump. There is some confusion among local residents and anglers about the appropriate procedures, and whether there are regulations (and who is enforcing them). Stream Watch volunteers were often present and spread educational messages about the new fish cleaning and carcass removal plan, but it's clear that they can't reach every angler and many anglers are not receptive to the message in any case. Many anglers remarked that they have had a long history of cleaning fish on the banks of the Russian at cleaning tables, and were disappointed those were removed (see survey results on the issue). In many cases, these anglers noted that they simply cleaned their fish on the banks without the table. Lines at the few remaining cleaning tables were also occasionally long especially during the first run. Most anglers mentioned potential solutions such as returning the tables or making requirements to throw carcasses into the fast water of the Kenai. Most people I approached to participate in the survey were very cooperative, particularly at Jim's Landing. Most were happy to see their opinions being taken into account and excited State Parks was taking a look at management issues on the Upper Kenai River, Over time I got a good sense for when to approach potential survey participants. Waiting for users to land their boat to make contact was the key for public participation. If I approached just after a boat landing, or while pulling a vehicle down the ramp, often time people were too pre occupied. About 15% of the public I approached were skeptical. One concern was that personal information would be used inappropriately or that the goals of the survey would not follow their outlook regarding what needs to change on the river. Some were fed up with agency officials not doing enough to regulate and manage the river. Some were skeptical in the intentions of why the survey was being conducted. In these cases I talked with participants and let them know this was their opportunity to give their input regarding future management actions. To allay these concerns, l assured them any personal information would be kept strictly confidential erased from our data base after they sent their survey responses (we only needed email or postal addresses to send them the follow -up survey). Most of the time the public cooperated by completing the survey. In many cases, those concerned about confidentiality had some of the strongest opinions regarding the river (expressed verbally). About 5% refused to complete the survey (see methods for details), For some, the primary reason expressed seemed to be, 'this was my first and only time being the river." But others appeared to dislike agencies or were opposed toward the study. Reaction to the survey at Sportsman's /Ferry or Russian River was more varied than at Jim's Landing. In general, bank anglers were slightly more hesitant to participate (see response rate differences reported in methods), although most still agreed to participate. Many more bank anglers at the Russian River confluence seemed to have a more difficult time understanding the purpose of the study or survey directions compared to other sites. They also tended to take longer to complete the on -site survey. Bank anglers at the ferry /confluence often included "regulars" that l saw repeatedly. Their verbal comments often focused on overcrowding, trash, ''designated handicapped" area not being available (due to non handicapped anglers using the area, sometimes accompanied by aggressive responses). Concluding comment it is not a secret that many times and places on the Kenai River are overcrowded. These are some ways we can help the river and public users. Being a part of the Kenai River Recreation Study 2009 has opened my eyes to the issues that need to be addressed to keep this river a healthy and desirable destination. The Kenai River is truly a magical place. There are many people that love this river and its watershed. They want to see this resource protected and it is a very serious issue for many people. After talking with hundreds of Kenai River users (including locals, visitors, guides, and unguided), I found that many want to see changes and are willing to help.